Spiritual Rebirth – How do we get back?

 

Do Not Focus on Self – Focus on Building the Kingdom

 

Spiritual - Awakening - Childlike Belief - Fortified with - Repentance - Baptism - Gift of the Holy Ghost - Spiritual

Death                                                           Pure Doctrine                                                                                    Life

D&C 29:41                                                                                                                                                              D&C 20:31                     

Helaman 14:16                                                                                                                                                   Alma 13:29

 

(Moses 5:4.) - Awakening

 

4 And Adam and Eve, his wife, called upon the name of the Lord, and they heard the voice of the Lord from the way toward the Garden of Eden, speaking unto them, and they saw him not; for they were shut out from his presence.

 

(Alma 5:7.)

 

7 Behold, he changed their hearts; yea, he awakened them out of a deep sleep, and they awoke unto God. Behold, they were in the midst of darkness; nevertheless, their souls were illuminated by the light of the everlasting word; yea, they were encircled about by the bands of death, and the chains of hell, and an everlasting destruction did await them.

 

 

(Moses 5:5.) – How do we get back?

 

5 And he gave unto them commandments, that they should worship the Lord their God, and should offer the firstlings of their flocks, for an offering unto the Lord. And Adam was obedient unto the commandments of the Lord.

 

(Moses 5:6.) – Give Sacrifice - Obedience

 

6 And after many days an angel of the Lord appeared unto Adam, saying: Why dost thou offer sacrifices unto the Lord? And Adam said unto him: I know not, save the Lord commanded me.

 

Leviticus 1:4-9 – Head – Fat – Innards – Legs – Carcass = Consecration Offering >>>Sin Burnt /Peace/Thanks

 

(Leviticus 1:4-9.)

 

4 And he shall put his hand upon the head of the burnt offering; and it shall be accepted for him to make atonement for him.

 

5 And he shall kill the bullock before the LORD: and the priests, Aaron's sons, shall bring the blood, and sprinkle the blood round about upon the altar that is by the door of the tabernacle of the congregation.

 

6 And he shall flay the burnt offering, and cut it into his pieces.

 

7 And the sons of Aaron the priest shall put fire upon the altar, and lay the wood in order upon the fire:

 

8 And the priests, Aaron's sons, shall lay the parts, the head, and the fat, in order upon the wood that is on the fire which is upon the altar:

 

9 But his inwards and his legs shall he wash in water: and the priest shall burn all on the altar, to be a burnt sacrifice, an offering made by fire, of a sweet savour unto the LORD.

                                                                                                                                                                                  

 

Head – Consecrate our mind in study

Fat – Energy

Innards – Emotion, Heart, Compassion, Love

Legs – Direction of life, stay on the path to Eternal Life                              

Carcass – Giving our All

 

God and Priest eat the offerings (except Burnt, only for God); they are reconciled together, points to the Atonement.  Effort in worship, all our actions directed to God.

 

 

Sacrifices Pointing to Christ

 

The sacrifices of the Law of Moses were the major temple ordinances of ancient Israel, performed under strict conditions spelled out in the books of Leviticus and Exodus. According to the Law of Moses, the sacrifices could only be administered by the priests and only at the appointed location: at the tabernacle during the wanderings and after the settlement in Palestine, and at the temple in Jerusalem following its construction. Although there were several kinds of sacrifices, there was one central focus, as was revealed in the days of Adam: "This thing is a similitude of the sacrifice of the Only Begotten of the Father, which is full of grace and truth" (Moses 5:7). The atoning sacrifice of the Lord Jesus Christ was the theme which undergirded the entire idea of sacrifice in the Old Testament, including the sacrifices of the Law of Moses. Sacrifice as a function of worship was symbolic of the Atonement, and the sacrifices were meant to teach the principles upon which the Atonement was based (see "Justice and Mercy in the Law," below). Sadly, through most of Israelite history apostasy had removed that understanding from the worship of Israel, and the Old Testament is silent regarding the sacrifices' true meaning. fn It is likely that from the days of Moses until the coming of Jesus, only a minority of Israelites were able to see beyond the functions of Mosaic law to the sacred Atonement to which they pointed—or had that knowledge revealed to them (Mosiah 13:32). No hint of such knowledge is found in the writings of the prophets of the Old Testament. Perhaps during that time the knowledge of the true origin and function of sacrifice was withdrawn from Israel (along with other blessings), as a result of the inability of the people as a whole to live in accordance with the light and knowledge that they had received. fn Yet Israel continued the practices, and sacrifice remained in the minds of Israel the means by which holiness was achieved and maintained and sin purged. Fortunately, we have a second witness for Christ that teaches us the meaning of sacrifice and the mission of the Savior; the Book of Mormon provides the fuller perspective.

 

Under the Law of Moses, four categories of animal sacrifice were most important: Burnt Offerings, Well-being (KJV, "Peace") Offerings, Sin ("Purgation") Offerings, and Trespass ("Reparation") Offerings. fn

 

Burnt Offerings existed centuries prior to the time of Moses. Adam and other righteous Saints down to the time of Moses offered up burnt offerings to commemorate in advance the future sacrifice of Christ (see especially Moses 5:7; Jacob 4:5; also Gen. 8:20; 22:1-18). These were sacrifices of worship that pointed to the Savior. When the Law of Moses was revealed, these sacrifices were retained as part of that law, although we do not know to what extent their function and meaning differed from those of the sacrifices of the Patriarchs. Under the Mosaic system, the animal was a male without blemish. The entire animal was burned on the altar, to atone for sin in general. fn Often they were public sacrifices, performed as part of the regular daily routine of the priests.

 

Well-being Offerings were offerings that were initiated by worshipers for their own special purposes. Most common among them were thanksgiving offerings (to show special thanks to the Lord; Lev. 7:12-13, 15; 22:29), vow offerings (to seal a covenant; Lev. 7:16; 22:18, 21, 23), and free-will offerings (to show willingness to offer freely; Lev. 7:16; 22:18, 21, 23). These could be males or females from the herd or flock, and only parts of the animal were burned, while the rest was eaten by the worshiper and the priests. fn

 

Sin and Trespass Offerings were for the purpose of achieving reconciliation following violations of the laws of society or God. When one was guilty of violating any of the revealed laws, atonement had to be made by taking the prescribed animal to the priests at the sanctuary. Several different animals were allowable, based on the station and wealth of the offerer. Only parts of the animal were burned; the rest was eaten. Sin and trespass offerings were the same, except that trespass offerings required restitution as well. fn The priests offered up the sacrifice in behalf of the worshiper, and through the animal's death the worshiper was reconciled with the law and thereby made ritually clean. These offerings, more than any others, symbolized the Atonement of the Savior with its power to remove sin from our lives through vicarious sacrifice

 

 

(Kent P. Jackson and Robert L. Millet, eds., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 3: Genesis to 2 Samuel [Salt Lake City: Randall Book, 1985], 172.)

 

 

(Matthew 22:35-37.)

 

35 Then one of them, which was a lawyer, asked him a question, tempting him, and saying,

 

36 Master, which is the great commandment in the law?

 

37 Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.

 

 

Sharing Insights
from My Life

 NEAL A. MAXWELL

Neal A. Maxwell was a member of the Council of the
Twelve Apostles of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
when this devotional address was delivered at BYU on 12 January 1999
.

I am going to preach a hard doctrine to you now. The submission of one's will is really the only uniquely personal thing we have to place on God's altar. It is a hard doctrine, but it is true. The many other things we give to God, however nice that may be of us, are actually things He has already given us, and He has loaned them to us. But when we begin to submit ourselves by letting our wills be swallowed up in God's will, then we are really giving something to Him. And that hard doctrine lies at the center of discipleship. There is a part of us that is ultimately sovereign, the mind and heart, where we really do decide which way to go and what to do. And when we submit to His will, then we've really given Him the one thing He asks of us. And the other things are not very, very important. It is the only possession we have that we can give, and there is no resulting shortage in our agency as a result. Instead, what we see is a flowering of our talents and more and more surges of joy. Submission to Him is the only form of submission that is completely safe.

This ought to be more obvious to us than it is sometimes, brothers and sisters, because developmentally, as well as doctrinally, all the other commandments hang, as Jesus said, on the two great interactive commandments. Let me read them to you now because they are so vital.

 

Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.

This is the first and great commandment.

And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.

On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets. [Matthew 22:37–40]

 

Now we don't think about it enough in the Church, but the first commandment is first for a reason. And the second commandment is second for a reason. True, the second commandment is like unto the first, but it isn't the first commandment. We worship the perfect object of that first commandment, God, because of His spiritual supremacy. We do not worship our neighbors. We are to love them but not worship them. This recognition of God's supremacy on all counts is why that commandment is first and why it is completely safe for us to submit to Him. Besides, at a university it is not inappropriate to remind you that that first commandment includes all of our heart, soul, and mind. The mind must surrender to God, too. It is my impression, looking about the world, that there are comparatively more knees bent in reverence to God than there are minds bent in reverence to Him. That human stubbornness tends to show up in terms of our unwillingness to submit our minds to Him.

C. S. Lewis put it well when he said, "We are bidden to 'put on Christ,' to become like God. That is, whether we like it or not, God intends to give us what we need, not what we now think we want" (The Problem of Pain, chapter 3, paragraph 18). Hence it is so vital for us to be submissive because we'll be puzzled when He gives us what we need in order to become more like Him and the Son, unless we are submissive in mind.

Now that grand key, therefore, is why we will have missed the train if Jesus is a stranger and far from the thoughts and intents of our heart. Because of his intellectual submissiveness, Enoch learned about what Paul called "the deep things of God" (1 Corinthians 2:10). I love that phrase of Paul's. Enoch personally saw the tears of the Lord. He personally heard the Lord's lamentations about the human family. God recited how He has given us our agency, commanded us to love and to choose Him and likewise love one another. Here again are the two great commandments. Yet we mortals so often choose evil or let the cares of the world crowd out the important things.

Instead of choosing God and His ways, we get busy with the cares of the world, and that is when neighbors get excluded, too. So obeying that first great commandment permits us to acknowledge and love the Lord and to accept His love of us, brothers and sisters, including the timing and shaping of us. Remember Nephi's meek acceptance of God's will: "I know that [God] loveth his children; nevertheless, I do not know the meaning of all things" (1 Nephi 11:17). We don't know the meaning of all things, but we know that God loves us, and that is sufficient to get us by and through anything.

We have a lot of people who partially keep the second commandment more than they truly keep the first. The trouble with just focusing on the second commandment to the exclusion of the first is that we may momentarily do some good deed for a neighbor, but it may not mean that we have worshipped God with all our mind. The first commandment sets the high tone, the divine standard. If it were not so, then, as the scriptures say, "Every man walketh in his own way, and after the image of his own god, whose image is in the likeness of the world" (D&C 1:16). That first commandment is the linchpin for everything else. Even self-centered people find themselves doing good, keeping the second commandment at times, but it is almost a kind of sidebar thing, as though they really have other things to do but are going to do a modicum of service here and feel good about it. We must not, therefore, overlook how crucial that first commandment is.

Furthermore, regarding that commandment, mortal choices need not necessarily be wicked in order to do harm. Some choices are diversions more than they are transgressions. As a result of these diversions, the sins of omission mount up. And they constitute a real deprivation because of what we withhold from our fellow human beings. Perhaps it is unintentional, but without that first commandment, some things get omitted.

In contrast, the Lord's reach for us is so redemptive and constant. His arm, we are told in the Book of Mormon, extends all the day long (see 2 Nephi 28:32). And the prophet Mormon spoke in powerful lamentation of those who did not respond even so (see Mormon 6:16–22). Yet Jesus waits with open arms to receive you, and if we are fully faithful at a much later date, we can eventually know at the entrance to His kingdom that sublime moment the prophet Mormon described when we could be "clasped in the arms of Jesus" (Mormon 5:11). There, the Lord Himself, by choice, is the gatekeeper, "and he employeth no servants there" (2 Nephi 9:41). This is why King Lamoni's father surely had it right. In His halting initial faith he said to the Lord, "I will give away all my sins to know thee" (Alma 22:18). That sacred deep act of discipleship is so crucial. I love, therefore, this statement of the Prophet Joseph Smith. I find it encouraging, as you doubtless have in terms of your discipleship. The Prophet Joseph said:

 We consider that God has created man with a mind capable of instruction, and a faculty which may be enlarged in proportion to the heed and diligence given to the light communicated from heaven to the intellect; and that the nearer man approaches perfection, the clearer are his views, and the greater his enjoyments, till he has overcome the evils of his life and lost every desire for sin; and like the ancients, arrives at that point of faith where he is wrapped in the power and glory of his Maker and is caught up to dwell with Him. But we consider that this is a station to which no man ever arrived in a moment. [Teachings, p. 51]

 King Benjamin said of that moment, that when we reach it, we will "have no more disposition to do evil" (Mosiah 5:2). And we can tell in our hearts and with the help of our conscience how we are doing on the basis of those two criteria. This means, frankly, that our sins of omission, at least speaking for myself, need more attention and appreciation and more repentance. They don't involve, as said earlier, transgression, but they are a matter of deflection.

 

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 20:31.)

 

31 And we know also, that sanctification through the grace of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ is just and true, to all those who love and serve God with all their mights, minds, and strength.

 

 

The Law of Worship and the Law of Sacrifice

Bruce Satterfield
Department of Religious Education
Brigham Young University - Idaho

[Found in New Perspectives, Fall Semester Vol. 14, No. 2, November 1997, pp. 14-16.]

In holy temples, we enter into covenants with God that are essential for our progress towards exaltation. One such covenant centers on the law of sacrifice.(1) It is important to understand the intent of the law of sacrifice in order to honor the covenant associated with it. A study of the scriptures will greatly aid our coming to understand the spirit of the law of sacrifice while at the same time increasing our motivation and determination to live the law.

According to the scriptural account, after Adam and Eve were cast out of the Garden of Eden, they "called upon the name of the Lord." What they prayed for is not stated. But it must be certain that at least one of the things they wanted to know was how to do to regain God's presence for as the account reads, "they were shut out from his presence" (Moses 5:4). In response to their prayers, the Lord said "that they should worship the Lord their God, and should offer the firstlings of their flocks, for an offering unto the Lord" (Moses 5:5).

The law of worship has been given to man in every age. In our dispensation, the Lord told the Church, "all men must repent and believe on the name of Jesus Christ, and worship the Father in his name. . . . or they cannot be saved in the Kingdom of God" (D&C 20:29). Dallin H. Oaks described true worship in these terms: "Worship often includes actions, but true worship always involves a particular attitude of mind. The attitude of worship evokes the deepest feelings of allegiance, adoration, and awe. Worship combines love and reverence in a state of devotion that draws our spirits closer to God."(2) The attitude of true worship of God means to emulate God by placing him at the very center of our lives. When God is placed at the center of our lives then his work and glory, which is to "bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of man" (Moses 1:39), becomes our work and glory. In this condition all our actions are ultimately aimed at bringing to pass the immortality and eternal life of God's children.

The law of worship and the law of sacrifice are inherently connected. The ritual associated with the law of sacrifice is a visual representation of the law of worship. We are not told specifically how Adam performed the ritual of the law of sacrifice. We do know, however, that the law of sacrifice was passed on to Adam's posterity. It continued to the time of Moses and was incorporated in the law of Moses. In Leviticus chapter one, a detailed description of the ritual associated with the law of sacrifice is given. This description is very revealing. Since the "law of sacrifice is required of all disciples,"(3) the description of the sacrificial procedure will help in understanding what is meant by the law of sacrifice and the law of worship.

According to Leviticus 1, the offering was first killed (vs. 5). After it was killed, the animal was flayed, or skinned (vs. 6). The skin was not to be burnt for that would produce an offensive smell; the sacrifice was to be a "sweet savour unto the Lord" (vs. 9), meaning that this sacrifice was acceptable to God. The animal was then cut into pieces and laid in a specified order on the altar (vss. 6-9). First, the head was removed and placed on the altar. Second, the fat was cut off and laid next to the head. Then the inwards were taken out and laid next to the fat. After that, the legs were cut off the carcass and laid next to the inwards. Finally, the carcass was placed on the altar. After all this was done, the entire animal was consumed in flames. It seems that the sacrificial offerings performed at the time of Adam were similar to the procedure described in Leviticus 1 for we are told that Abel "brought of the firstlings of his flock, and the fat thereof" (Genesis 4:4; Moses 5:20; emphasis added).

The Hebrew name of the burnt offering is olah ("that which goes up"), meaning the offering that goes up or is given up to God. The translation of olah in the King James Version is the "burnt offering" because the entire animal was consumed in the flames of the fire, and, unlike other sacrifices, no part was eaten by the offerer or priest. The symbolism of this is clear: the burnt offering was a consecration offering. In other words, the entire offering was consecrated to God. It can be seen from this that the law of sacrifice is not only inherently connected with the law of worship but also with another covenant made in the temple, the law of consecration. Of this, Elder Bruce R. McConkie taught: "Sacrifice and consecration are inseparably intertwined"(4)

But what was being sacrificed or consecrated to God? The answer was given to Adam and Eve. After "many days" of performing the ritual associated with the law of sacrifice, "an angel of the Lord appeared unto Adam, saying: Why dost thou offer sacrifices unto the Lord?" Adam responded by saying, "I know not, save the Lord commanded me." Then the angel explained the meaning of the sacrifice in these words: "This thing is a similitude of the sacrifice of the Only Begotten of the Father" (Moses 5:6-7). That is, the lamb symbolized the sacrifice of Jesus Christ in behalf of Adam and Eve and their posterity.

The cutting of the lamb into pieces and placing the pieces on the altar to be entirely consumed by the flames was a representation of the worship, sacrifice, and consecration of Jesus Christ to God's work and glory. His worship and sacrifice was evidenced by his consecrating all he had to the building of the Kingdom of God. Each piece of the sacrificial lamb symbolized specific aspects of Christ's consecration to the salvation of man through the atonement. The severed head symbolized that the Savior would devote all his thoughts, intellect, and study to the salvation of man. Likewise, the fat represented that all the Savior's energy would be consecrated to the atoning work. The inwards, typifying the Savior's emotions, best exemplified by his love, mercy, and compassion, would be aimed at saving mankind from a world of darkness and doom while leading them into the path that leads to exaltation. The legs symbolized that the direction and course of the Savior's life would be dedicated to one end alone: to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of God's children. In other words, the sacrifice, flaying, and burning of the sacrificial lamb symbolized that Christ would sacrifice and devote all his heart, might, mind, and strength to God's work and glory. This is the ultimate form of worship!

Just as Jesus Christ would sacrifice and consecrate all he had to God's work and glory so must Adam and Eve (and their posterity) sacrifice all they have for the same purpose.(5) Therefore, the angel told Adam and Eve that from that day forward, everything they did was to be done "in the name of the Son" (Moses 5:7-8). Paul stated it this way: "present your bodies a living sacrifice; holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service" (Romans 12:1). It is in this way that many in the past "who had been faithful in the testimony of Jesus while they lived in mortality" had "offered sacrifice in the similitude of the great sacrifice of the Son of God" (D&C 138:12-13).

The scriptures also reveal many other insights relative to the law of sacrifice that are helpful. For instance, as already noted, the ritual associated with the law of sacrifice became an important part of the law of Moses. In fact, the burnt offering was to be offered "day by day" in both the morning and the evening (Numbers 28:3-4). This was to continually remind Israel that not only were they dependent upon the future sacrifice of the Messiah for their salvation but that all their activities, every day, all day, should be devoted to God.

The Old Testament is clear that performing the ritual of sacrifice was not as important as the intent of the rite. When Saul was commanded by the prophet Samuel to lead the Israelites in battle against their age old enemy, the Amalekites, he was told to "utterly destroy all that they [the Amalekites] have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass" (1 Samuel 15:3). However, Saul was disobedient to the command of the Lord through Samuel. After defeating the Amalekites, and killing all the people, he spared "the best of the sheep, and of the oxen, and of the fatlings, and the lambs" that he might offer "sacrifice unto the Lord" (1 Samuel 15:9-21). Saul's disobedience violated the very intent of the law of sacrifice. Therefore, Samuel rebuked Saul saying, "Hath the LORD as great delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices, as in obeying the voice of the LORD? Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken than the fat of rams" (1 Samuel 15:22). Likewise, a later prophet chided Israel for ritualistic living of the law of sacrifice without considering its intent: "For I desired mercy, and not sacrifice; and the knowledge of God more than burnt offerings" (Hosea 6:6).

The relationship between the intent of the law of sacrifice and the ritual is well illustrated in the story of Lehi. When Lehi was commanded to leave Jerusalem "and depart into the wilderness," we are told that he "he left his house, and the land of his inheritance, and his gold, and his silver, and his precious things, and took nothing with him, save it were his family, and provisions, and tents, and departed into the wilderness" (1 Nephi 2:4). Some days later, when he and his family stopped their journey and pitched their tents near a river, Lehi "built an altar of stones, and made an offering unto the Lord, and gave thanks unto the Lord our God" (1 Nephi 2:7). The relationship is clear. After sacrificing all his worldly possessions, Lehi offered a sacrifice to demonstrate his willingness to worship God with all his heart, might, mind, and strength by placing him at the center of his life and actions.

Note the similarity in the life of Abraham. After the Lord had told him to "Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father's house, unto a land that I will shew thee," Abraham obediently left his land and people and came into the land of Canaan, the Promised Land. Upon his arrival, he built an altar and offered sacrifice (Gen. 12:7).

In fact, the whole life of Abraham is a paradigm of how the law of sacrifice should be lived. At various times, he was asked to give up mortal things for higher ideals. In all cases, Abraham was obedient to the law of sacrifice (see Genesis 12-22) and therefore, he achieved his exaltation (see D&C 132:29-37). Abraham epitomizes what Joseph Smith said about the law of sacrifice. He explained that the law of sacrifice requires a "man to lay down his all, his character and reputation, his honor, and applause, his good name among men, his houses, his lands, his brothers and sisters, his wife and children, and even his own life -- counting all things but filth and dross for the excellency of the knowledge of Jesus Christ."(6)

The example of Abraham and Lehi is found in other places in the scriptures. For instance, the law of sacrifice permeates the entire gospel of Matthew. Note the following examples. Upon seeing the star that signaled the birth of the Messiah, the wise men demonstrated their willingness to make a sacrifice for a higher cause by leaving their homeland and making an extended journey to find the Christ child and pay homage to him. The giving of their treasure, which included the expensive gifts of "gold, and frankincense, and myrrh," was a further demonstration of their willingness to sacrifice what they had to the child who would bring salvation to all men (see Matt. 2:1-12). In stark contrast, Herod, the king of the Savior's own people, was not willing to sacrifice anything to worship the Savior but instead attempted to assassinate his would be rival (Matt. 2:1-18). Matthew also records the sacrifice made by some of the Savior's disciples. When Peter, Andrew, James, and John were asked to follow the Savior, "they straightway left their nets [occupation], and followed him." Interestingly enough, the account reveals that James and John not only left their nets, but their father also (Matt. 4:18-22). Speaking of this kind of sacrifice, Matthew records the Savior saying, "He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me" (Matthew 10:37). Again, on another occasion, the Savior said: "And every one that hath forsaken houses, or brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, or wife, or children, or lands, for my name's sake, shall receive an hundredfold, and shall inherit everlasting life" (Matt. 19:29). Matthew also records that the ultimate sacrifice made by any man was made by the Savior himself when he retired to Gethsemane to begin the atoning sacrifice. That this was truly a sacrifice is revealed in the Savior's own words, "O my Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me: nevertheless not as I will, but as thou wilt" (Matt. 26:39). Submitting our will to the will of the Father is the essence of the law of sacrifice.

The scriptures inform us that with the sacrifice of Jesus Christ the ritual associated with the law of sacrifice, the killing of an animal was done away with. After the great destruction had come upon the land associated with the death of Christ, the Lord said to the people: "ye shall offer up unto me no more the shedding of blood; yea, your sacrifices and your burnt offerings shall be done away, for I will accept none of your sacrifices and your burnt offerings." Instead of offering blood sacrifices, the Lord required a new sacrifice: "And ye shall offer for a sacrifice unto me a broken heart and a contrite spirit" (3 Nephi 9:19-20). In the Doctrine and Covenants, the latter-day Church was given the same commandment: "Thou shalt offer a sacrifice unto the Lord thy God in righteousness, even that of a broken heart and a contrite spirit" (D&C 59:8).

For one to offer a sacrifice of a broken heart and a contrite spirit, he must recognize his spiritual poorness, mourn his sins, and come unto Christ for forgiveness. When that happens, the sacrifice of Christ will come into his heart and comfort him through the miracle of forgiveness (see 3 Nephi 12:3-4). Elder Neal A. Maxwell spoke of this in these terms:

"So it is that real, personal sacrifice never was placing an animal on the altar. Instead, it is a willingness to put the animal in us upon the altar and letting it be consumed! Such is the "sacrifice unto the Lord . . . of a broken heart and a contrite spirit," (D&C 59:8), a prerequisite to taking up the cross, while giving "away all [our] sins" in order to know God (Alma 22:18); for the denial of self precedes the full acceptance of Him."(7)

But this is only the beginning of honoring the intent of the law of sacrifice. President Spencer W. Kimball taught:

" . . .we must lay on the altar and sacrifice whatever is required by the Lord. We begin by offering a "broken heart and a contrite spirit." We follow this by giving our best effort in our assigned fields of labor and callings. We learn our duty and execute it fully. Finally we consecrate our time, talents and means as called upon by our file leaders and as prompted by the whisperings of the Spirit. In the Church, as in the Welfare system also, we can give expression to every ability, every righteous desire, every thoughtful impulse. Whether a volunteer, father, home teacher, bishop, or neighbor, whether a visiting teacher, mother, homemaker, or friend--there is ample opportunity to give our all."(8)

In conclusion, the law of worship and the law of sacrifice are interrelated laws that are designed to put God at the center of our lives. Those who enter into these laws by covenant, place all they have on the altar. Their minds, energy, heart, and course of life will be devoted to God's work and glory which is to bring to pass "the immortality and eternal life of man." In other words, they will "love and serve God with all their mights, minds, and strength" (D&C 20:31). In so doing, they will lose their life in the service of others. By losing their life in the building of the kingdom of God, they shall find it saved in the celestial kingdom (see Matt. 10:39). President Harold B. Lee taught:

"If in this day the Church rises to the call of the First Presidency, and if Church members sacrifice of their means, their time, their talents for the upbuilding of the kingdom of God, not withholding their own lives, if that were necessary, then there will come to this people, and to that individual who thus is willing to consecrate himself, the greatest joy that can come to the human soul."(9)
 

References

1. President Harold B. Lee taught, "We have in sacred places what we call the law of sacrifice" (The Teachings of Harold B. Lee, Ed. Clyde J. Williams, [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1996] p.318). Likewise, President Ezra Taft Benson stated, "In the course of our visits to the temple, we are given insights into the meaning of the eternal journey of man. We see beautiful and impressive symbolisms of the most important events -- past, present, and future -- symbolizing man's mission in relationship to God. We are reminded of our obligations as we make solemn covenants pertaining to obedience, consecration, sacrifice, and dedicated service to our Heavenly Father" (Ezra Taft Benson, Teachings of Ezra Taft Benson, [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1988] p. 251).

2. Dallin H. Oaks, Pure in Heart, Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1988. p.125.

3. Bruce R. McConkie, The Mortal Messiah. The Messiah Series, vols. 2-5. Salt Lake City: Deseret, 1979-1982. 3:240.

4. Conference Report, Apr. 1975, p. 74; or Ensign, May 1975, p. 50.

5. Elder McConkie taught,

"The law of consecration is that we consecrate our time, our talents, and our money and property to the cause of the Church: such are to be available to the extent they are needed to further the Lord's interests on earth.

"The law of sacrifice is that we are willing to sacrifice all that we have for the truth's sake--our character and reputation; our honor and applause; our good name among men; our houses, lands, and families: all things, even our very lives if need be" (Conference Report, Apr. 1975, p. 74; or Ensign, May 1975, p. 50).

6. Lectures on Faith, 6:5.

7. Conference Report, Apr. 1995, p. 91; or Ensign, May 1995, p. 68.

8. Conference Report, Apr. 1978, pp.123­24; or Ensign, May 1978, p.81.

9. The Teachings of Harold B. Lee, Ed. Clyde J. Williams, [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1996] p.318.

 

 

(Moses 5:8.) – Repent of our Sins of Commission

 

8 Wherefore, thou shalt do all that thou doest in the name of the Son, and thou shalt repent and call upon God in the name of the Son forevermore.

 

(Moses 6:53, 63-65) – Baptism, Spiritual Rebirth, (Sanctification)

 

53 And our father Adam spake unto the Lord, and said: Why is it that men must repent and be baptized in water? And the Lord said unto Adam: Behold I have forgiven thee thy transgression in the Garden of Eden.

 

63 And behold, all things have their likeness, and all things are created and made to bear record of me, both things which are temporal, and things which are spiritual; things which are in the heavens above, and things which are on the earth, and things which are in the earth, and things which are under the earth, both above and beneath: all things bear record of me.

 

64 And it came to pass, when the Lord had spoken with Adam, our father, that Adam cried unto the Lord, and he was caught away by the Spirit of the Lord, and was carried down into the water, and was laid under the water, and was brought forth out of the water.

 

65 And thus he was baptized, and the Spirit of God descended upon him, and thus he was born of the Spirit, and became quickened in the inner man.

 

The Doctrines of Justification and Sanctification

Bruce Satterfield
Department of Religious Education
Brigham Young University - Idaho

 

 

Adam Questions Why Men Must Repent and Be Baptized

After Adam and Eve were driven from the Garden of Eden, the Lord called upon Adam, saying, "I am God; I made the world, and men before they were in the flesh." He then declared, "If thou wilt turn unto me, and hearken unto my voice, and believe, and repent of all thy transgressions, and be baptized, even in water, in the name of mine Only Begotten Son, who is full of grace and truth, which is Jesus Christ, the only name which shall be given under heaven, whereby salvation shall come unto the children of men, ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost, asking all things in his name, and whatsoever ye shall ask, it shall be given you." Adam responded, saying, "Why is it that men must repent and be baptized in water?" (Moses 6:52-53)

The Lord Answers Adam's Question

In answering Adam's question, the Lord introduced the doctrines of justification and sanctification. The Lord's answer is in two parts. In the first part, Adam is informed that he has no need to repent of his transgression in the garden: "Behold I have forgiven thee thy transgression in the Garden of Eden" (Moses 6:51-53). That is, Adam and Eve had acted appropriately in the garden by eating the fruit thus opening the way for God's children to come to mortality. Therefore, the Lord forgave them unconditionally for their transgression in the garden: Adam and Eve did not need to repent of their eating of the forbidden fruit. "Hence came the saying abroad among the people, that the Son of God hath atoned for original guilt [Adam's transgression in the garden], wherein the sins of the parents cannot be answered upon the heads of the children, for they are whole from the foundation of the world" (Moses 6:54).

The Doctrine of Sanctification

Justification is only part of what must occur before man can be brought back into the presence of God. Nephi explained that when man commits sin, he becomes unclean or filthy. He then declared: "I say unto you, the kingdom of God is not filthy, and there cannot any unclean thing enter into the kingdom of God; wherefore there must needs be a place of filthiness prepared for that which is filthy (1 Nephi 15:34). Justification acquits man from sin but it does not cleanse him from the effects of sin. The process of cleansing man from the effects of sin is known as sanctification. To sanctify means to be made free from the effects of sin, to be purified (Webster's New World Dictionary). Sanctification is the process by which one is cleansed and purified from sin.

The following example will serve to illustrate the difference between justification and sanctification. Suppose a man, who had smoked for twenty years, finally realized the error of his ways and repented of his actions. He quite smoking, cold turkey, and never picked up another cigarette the rest of his life. He could be justified or acquitted of his sin and allowed to join the Church and participate in the blessings of the gospel. Though he quite smoking, he nevertheless would still suffer the effects of his sinful habit. His lungs would remain blackened because of the continually inhalation of smoke filled with tar and nicotine. What can he do about the effects of his sin? Nothing! The same is true with any sin. Though we may repent of our sins and never do them again, nonetheless, we cannot do away with the effects of our sins. We need divine help in order to become clean. This cleansing comes through the sanctifying powers of the Holy Ghost.

Sanctification comes through the gift of the Holy Ghost which is often called the baptism of fire. One of the primary missions of the Holy Ghost, and one not often spoken of, is his power to sanctify man from sin. Elder Bruce R. McConkie has written:

"To be sanctified is to be saved; to fall short of sanctification is to fail to gain full salvation. Only the sanctified gain eternal life. To be sanctified is to be clean; it is a state of purity and spotlessness in which no taint of sin is found. Only those who die as to sin and are born again to righteousness, becoming thus new creatures of the Holy Ghost, are numbered with the sanctified.

"It is the work and mission and ministry of the Holy Spirit of God to sanctify the souls of men. This is his assigned labor in the Eternal Godhead. How he does it we do not know, except that it is a work that can only be performed by a spirit being, and hence the need for one of his personality, status, and standing in the Supreme Presidency of the universe.

"Baptism of the Spirit is the way and the means whereby sanctification is made available. Thus, Jesus commands all the "ends of the earth" to be baptized in water "that ye may be sanctified by the reception of the Holy Ghost, that ye may stand spotless before me at the last day." (3 Nephi 27:20.) Truly, the Holy Ghost is a sanctifier, and the extent to which men receive and enjoy the gift of the Holy Ghost is the extent to which they are sanctified. In the lives of most of us, sanctification is an ongoing process, and we obtain that glorious status by degrees as we overcome the world and become saints in deed as well as in name." (A New Witness for the Articles of Faith, pp. 265-266; emphasis added)

When one is sanctified from sin, he is cleansed from all effects of sin. It is as if he never had committed the sin. Nevertheless, the knowledge of good and evil acquired through sin remains. Without question, Alma eventually became sanctified of his sinful past. However, it is evident that he never forgot his sins or the pains associated with them. Years after he had been forgiven or justified of his sins, he declared to his son:

"And now, behold, when I thought this, I could remember my pains no more; yea, I was harrowed up by the memory of my sins no more.

"And oh, what joy, and what marvelous light I did behold; yea, my soul was filled with joy as exceeding as was my pain!

"Yea, I say unto you, my son, that there could be nothing so exquisite and so bitter as were my pains. Yea, and again I say unto you, my son, that on the other hand, there can be nothing so exquisite and sweet as was my joy." (Alma 36:18-20)

Alma had come to know by his own experience good from evil!

When one is sanctified, he has received a full remission of his sins.  The Lord declared that a remission of sins is two fold process requiring both the baptism of water and the baptism of fire, “yea, even the Holy Ghost” (D&C 19:31).   Baptism alone does not remit sins.  It only begins the remission process.  The actual remission of sins comes through the Holy Ghost.  Nephi declared:  “For the gate by which he should enter is repentance and baptism by water; and then cometh a remission of your sins by fire and by the Holy Ghost” (2 Nephi 31:17). Likewise, the Savior taught the Nephites, “Now this is the commandment: Repent, all ye ends of the earth, and come unto me and be baptized in my name, that ye may be sanctified by the reception of the Holy Ghost, that ye may stand spotless before me at the last day” (3 Ne. 27:20). Joseph Smith said: “I further believe in the gift of the Holy Ghost by the laying on of hands.  Evidence by Peter’s preaching on the day of Pentacost, Acts 2:38.  You might as well baptize a bag of sand as a man, if not done in view of the remission of sins and getting of the Holy Ghost.  Baptism by water is but half a baptism, and is good for nothing without the other half -- that is, the baptism of the Holy Ghost.  (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p. 314).  Elder McConkie wrote:

"Baptism is for the remission of sins; it is the ordinance, ordained of God, to cleanse a human soul. Baptism is in water and of the Spirit and is preceded by repentance. The actual cleansing of the soul comes when the Holy Ghost is received. The Holy Ghost is a sanctifier whose divine commission is to burn dross and evil out of a human soul as though by fire, thus giving rise to the expression baptism of fire, which is the baptism of the Spirit. Forgiveness is assured when the contrite soul receives the Holy Spirit, because the Spirit will not dwell in an unclean tabernacle." (A New Witness for the Articles of Faith, p. 239)

Just as one may know that he has been justified when the guilt is removed, so one may know he has been sanctified. Alma taught that there were many who chose "to repent and work righteousness rather than to perish; Therefore they were called after this holy order, and were sanctified, and their garments were washed white through the blood of the Lamb. Now they, after being sanctified by the Holy Ghost, having their garments made white, being pure and spotless before God, could not look upon sin save it were with abhorrence" (Alma 13:10-12; emphasis added). The evil which they used to find appealing now became an abhorrence to them. The desire for sin had been removed through the sanctifying process. In the days of King Benjamin, the people who heard him speak and repented of their sins felt this same sanctifying power:

"And now, it came to pass that when King Benjamin had thus spoken to his people, he sent among them, desiring to know of his people if they believed the words which he had spoken unto them.

"And they all cried with one voice, saying: Yea, we believe all the words which thou hast spoken unto us; and also, we know of their surety and truth, because of the Spirit of the Lord Omnipotent, which has wrought a mighty change in us, or in our hearts, that we have no more disposition to do evil, but to do good continually." (Mosiah 5:1-2; emphasis added)

Generally speaking, the full effects of sanctification will not be experienced in mortality but will come after death as part of the resurrection process. President Brigham Young taught that those who seek after and obtain a celestial resurrection will be free from the effects of sin:

"I think it has been taught by some that as we lay our bodies down, they will so rise again in the resurrection with all the impediments and imperfections that they had here; and that if a wife does not love her husband in this state she cannot love him in the next. This is not so. Those who attain to the blessing of the first or celestial resurrection will be pure and holy, and perfect in body. Every man and woman that reaches to this unspeakable attainment will be as beautiful as the angels that surround the throne of God. If you can, by faithfulness in this life, obtain the right to come up in the morning of the resurrection, you need entertain no fears that the wife will be dissatisfied with her husband, or the husband with the wife; for those of the first resurrection will be free from sin and from the consequences and power of sin. This body 'is sown in corruption, it is raised in incorruption; it is sown in dishonor, it is raised in glory; it is sown in weakness, it is raised in power; it is sown a natural body, it is raised a spiritual body.' 'And, as we have borne the image of the earthly, we shall also bear the image of the heavenly.'" (Journal of Discourses, Vol.10, p.24)

Just as the blessing of justification is conditional, so is the blessing of sanctification. The Lord stated the conditions: "And we know also, that sanctification through the grace of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ is just and true, to all those who love and serve God with all their mights, minds, and strength" (D&C 20:31). Putting God and his work and glory at the center of our lives is the necessary condition for sanctification. Mormon noted that the more one places his God at the center of his life the greater the sanctification:

"Nevertheless they did fast and pray oft, and did wax stronger and stronger in their humility, and firmer and firmer in the faith of Christ, unto the filling their souls with joy and consolation, yea, even to the purifying and the sanctification of their hearts, which sanctification cometh because of their yielding their hearts unto God." (Helaman 3:35)

"Sanctify Yourselves"

The word sanctify is used in another sense in the scriptures. The Lord declared:

"And if your eye be single to my glory, your whole bodies shall be filled with light, and there shall be no darkness in you; and that body which is filled with light comprehendeth all things.

"Therefore, sanctify yourselves that your minds become single to God, and the days will come that you shall see him; for he will unveil his face unto you, and it shall be in his own time, and in his own way, and according to his own will." (D&C 88:67-68)

In these verses, the Lord commands that men "sanctify" themselves that their "minds become single to God." The meaning of the word sanctify in this verse is not to be confused with the definition given previously. Another definition of sanctify is to set apart or to consecrate to a certain end (Webster's New World Dictionary). This is the meaning of sanctify in the sacramental prayer. When the priest calls upon God to "bless and sanctify this bread (or water) to the souls of all those who eat in remembrance" of Christ, they are not asking that the bread be cleansed from sin. That is absurd. What is meant is that the bread and water are dedicated, consecrated, or set apart to the purposes of the sacrament and to nothing else. What the Lord is stating in these verses (D&C 88:67-68) is that men should set apart or consecrate their lives to God's work and glory. Then they will experience the sanctifying powers that will make them clean from the sins of the world and thus allow them to come back into the presence of God.

Because it is not often understood that the word sanctify has two different meanings and that both meanings are used at different times in the scriptures and in other circumstances, many are left confused when the word is used. For example, if one understands the word sanctify to mean be cleansed from sin, and he hears such phrases as to "sanctify yourselves" (D&C 43:11, 16; 88:68, 74; 133:4), he might think that the Lord is asking his people to purify or cleanse themselves from sin. But as already been shown, we cannot cleanse ourselves from sin! That is why their was an atonement made. What those scriptures mean is that we should remove ourselves from ungodly activities and dedicate ourselves to the work of God. When we do this, we are then we can become sanctified from sin. In view of this, Moroni stated:

"Yea, come unto Christ, and be perfected in him, and deny yourselves of all ungodliness; and if ye shall deny yourselves of all ungodliness and love God with all your might, mind and strength, then is his grace sufficient for you, that by his grace ye may be perfect in Christ; and if by the grace of God ye are perfect in Christ, ye can in nowise deny the power of God.

"And again, if ye by the grace of God are perfect in Christ, and deny not his power, then are ye sanctified in Christ by the grace of God, through the shedding of the blood of Christ, which is in the covenant of the Father unto the remission of your sins, that ye become holy, without spot." (Moroni 10:32-33)

There are many scriptures that use sanctify to mean "cleansed from sin." For example, we are told, "That he came into the world, even Jesus, to be crucified for the world, and to bear the sins of the world, and to sanctify the world, and to cleanse it from all unrighteousness" (D&C 76:41). The meaning here is obvious. Jesus Christ came into the world to cleanse or purify the world from sin. The context of each use must be considered in order to understand which definition should be used.
 
 

CONCLUSION

In answer to Adam's question, "Why is that men must repent and be baptized in water?" (Moses 6:53). Adam learned what the Apostle Paul has since taught, "For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God" (Romans 3:23). That in order to be forgiven of their sins and regain God's presence, man must repent and be baptized. Therefore, the Lord declared to Adam: "Wherefore teach it unto your children, that all men, everywhere, must repent, or they can in nowise inherit the kingdom of God, for no unclean thing can dwell there, or dwell in his presence" (Moses 6:57). The Lord told Adam that "all things have their likeness, and all things are created and made to bear record of me" (Moses 6:63). He taught Adam that the very birth of man is a likeness of what must happen to man in order to regain God's presence. Said he: "inasmuch as ye were born into the world by water, and blood, and the spirit, which I have made, and so became of dust a living soul, even so ye must be born again into the kingdom of heaven, of water, and of the Spirit, and be cleansed by blood, even the blood of mine Only Begotten; that ye might be sanctified from all sin, and enjoy the words of eternal life in this world, and eternal life in the world to come, even immortal glory." He then declared: "For by the water ye keep the commandment; by the Spirit ye are justified, and by the blood ye are sanctified" (Moses 6:59-60).

In other words, just as men have come into this fallen world through the birth process consisting of water (the mothers womb), blood (both the natural life and capacity to sin given to offspring by parents), and the spirit (the power given by God to live), so they must be born again to come into the presence of God. The born again process also consists of water, blood, and spirit. The process begins when men exercise faith in Christ, repent of their sins, and then make a covenant with God that they will keep his commandments. This covenant is made when one is baptized in water. Hence, "by the water ye keep the commandment."

Coming out of the waters of baptism is like coming out of the womb; a new person in a new world, a spiritual world! Baptism, however, is only the sign of the new beginning and a forgiving and cleansing of sin. The birth of water must be followed by the baptism of the Spirit which justifies man. After baptism, one must receive the ordinance of the laying on of hands for the Holy Ghost. If one has been baptized with integrity, has received the laying on of hands for the Holy Ghost, and remains faithful, then he may receive the actual reception of the gift of the Holy Ghost. With that reception, the ordinance of baptism would be sealed by the Holy Spirit of promise confirming that he qualifies for the promised blessings of cleansing. Hence, "by the Spirit he are justified."

After the man is justified, he must be sanctified through the blood of Christ freeing him from the effects of sin. Though sanctification actually comes through the baptism of fire or Holy Ghost, sanctification it is made possible only through the atoning blood of Christ. Hence, "by the blood He will miserably destroy those wicked men, and will let out [his] vineyard unto other husbandmen, which shall render him the fruits in their seasons. ye are sanctified."

Godhood = 1 Cleansing 2 Consecration/Dedication

 

Love God with all our might and mind and love and serve others.

 

Enos 1:1-27 – Repentance builds his character, verse 27, his calling and election is made sure, he has the Holy Spirit of Promise.

 

(Helaman 3:35.) – Yield your heart to what you Love.

 

35 Nevertheless they did fast and pray oft, and did wax stronger and stronger in their humility, and firmer and firmer in the faith of Christ, unto the filling their souls with joy and consolation, yea, even to the purifying and the sanctification of their hearts, which sanctification cometh because of their yielding their hearts unto God.

 

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 138:11.)

 

11 As I pondered over these things which are written, the eyes of my understanding were opened, and the Spirit of the Lord rested upon me, and I saw the hosts of the dead, both small and great.

 

 

 

Moses 6:66-67 – Adam & Eve Temple Ordinances – President Benson August, 1985 Ensign Article.

 

 

What I Hope You Will Teach
Your Children about the Temple

President Ezra Taft Benson
Ensign, Aug. 1985, pp. 6-10

The last time I saw President Heber J. Grant was in the Church Administration Building when he was quite aged. President Grant's chauffeur had driven him to the Church Administration Building where the chauffeur called for another brother to help him assist President Grant, one on each arm, to his office.

I was just entering the glass door opposite the Lion House in the Church Administration Building as President Grant was coming toward the door. He said to the two brethren assisting him, "Isn't that Brother Benson coming?"

They replied, "Yes."

He said, "Come here. Come here, Brother Benson."

I walked over to him, and President Grant said, "Did I ever tell you about the mean trick Brigham Young played on your great-grandfather?"

I said, "No, President. I didn't know Brigham Young ever played a mean trick on anyone."

He responded, "Oh, yes, he did. I'll tell you about it."

I could see that these two brethren were practically holding President Grant up, so I said, "I'll come to the house some time. I'd like to hear it."

He replied, "No, I'll tell you right here. These brethren can steady me while I tell you."

He said, "You know  where Zion's Bank and ZCMI are over on the corner?"

I said, "Yes."

He continued, "Your great-grandfather built the finest home in Salt Lake City on that corner, with the exception of Brigham Young's home (which, of course, was the Lion House). He had it all finished. It was a beautiful home--two stories with a porch at both levels on both sides of the house. It had a white picket fence around it with fruit trees and ornamental trees and with a little stream running through the yard. He was all ready to move his families in from their log cabins when President Young called him into the office one day. 'Brother Benson,' he said, 'we would like you to go to Cache Valley and pioneer that area and preside over the Saints. We suggest you sell your home to Daniel H. Wells.'

"Now," President Grant said, "Daniel H. Wells was Brigham Young's counselor. Wasn't that a mean trick? Come on, brethren, let's go."

In all the years that I had attended the Benson reunions I had never heard that story. So I had it verified by the Church Historical Department, and they assured me that the facts were as President Grant related them. They told me they had a tintype picture of the old home.

Since that time, I have been most grateful for the so-called "mean trick" of President Young, because were it not for that, the Bensons would not have their roots in Cache Valley.

I love Cache Valley, and I love the Saints in the area. And I am most grateful to be here on this anniversary of the Logan Temple centennial. This beautiful temple has truly been a beacon of light to Cache Valley. If our children and their children are taught well, this edifice will continue to be a symbol of special significance.

The temple is an ever-present reminder that God intends the family to be eternal. How fitting it is for mothers and fathers to point to the temple and say to their children, "That is the place where we were [page 8] married for eternity." By so doing, the ideal of temple marriage can be instilled within the minds and hearts of your children while they are very young.

I am grateful to the Lord that my temple memories extend back--even to young boyhood. I remember so well, as a little boy, coming in from the field and approaching the old farm house in Whitney, Idaho. I could hear my mother singing "Have I Done Any Good in the World Today?" (Hymns, no. 58.)

I can still see her in my mind's eye bending over the ironing board with newspapers on the floor, ironing long strips of white cloth, with beads of perspiration on her forehead. When I asked her what she was doing, she said, "These are temple robes, my son. Your father and I are going to the temple at Logan."

Then she put the old flatiron on the stove, drew a chair close to mine, and told me about temple work--how important it is to be able to go to the temple and participate in the sacred ordinances performed there. She also expressed her fervent hope that some day her children and grandchildren and great-grandchildren would have the opportunity to enjoy these priceless blessings.

These sweet memories about the spirit of temple work were a blessing in our farm home, our little rural ward of three hundred, and the old Oneida Stake. These memories have returned as I have performed the marriage of each of our children and grandchildren, my mother's grandchildren and great-grandchildren, under the influence of the Spirit in the house of the Lord.

These are choice memories to me, and I have often reflected on them. In the peace of these lovely temples, sometimes we find solutions to the serious problems of life. Under the influence of the Spirit, sometimes pure knowledge flows to us there. Temples are places of personal revelation. When I have been weighed down by a problem or a difficulty, I have gone to the House of the Lord with a prayer in my heart for answers. These answers have come in clear and unmistakable ways.

I would like to direct my remarks to you parents and grandparents. I would like to share with you what I would hope you would teach your children about the temple.

The temple is a sacred place, and the ordinances in the temple are of a sacred character. Because of its sacredness we are sometimes reluctant to say anything about the temple to our children and grandchildren.

As a consequence, many do not develop a real desire to go to the temple, or when they go there, they do so without much background to prepare them for the obligations and covenants they enter into.

I believe a proper understanding or background will immeasurably help prepare our youth for the temple. This understanding, I believe, will foster within them a desire to seek their priesthood blessings just as Abraham sought his.

When our Heavenly Father placed Adam and Eve on this earth, He did so with the purpose in mind of teaching them how to regain His presence. Our Father promised a Savior to redeem them from their fallen condition. He gave to them the plan of salvation and told them to teach their children faith in Jesus Christ and repentance. Further, Adam and his posterity were commanded by God to be baptized, to receive the Holy Ghost, and to enter into the order of the Son of God.

To enter into the order of the Son of God is the equivalent today of entering into the fullness of the Melchizedek Priesthood, which is only received in the house of the Lord.

Because Adam and Eve had complied with these requirements, God said to them, "Thou art after the order of him who was without beginning of days or end of years, from all eternity to all eternity." (Moses 6:67.)

Three years before Adam's death, a great event occurred. He took his son Seth, his grandson Enos, and other high priests who were his direct-line descendants, with others of his righteous posterity, into a valley called Adam-ondi-Ahman. There Adam gave to these righteous descendants his last blessing.

The Lord then appeared to them.

The vast congregation rose up and blessed Adam and called him Michael, the prince and archangel. The Lord himself declared Adam to be a prince forever over his own posterity.

Then Adam in his aged condition rose up and, being filled with the spirit of prophecy, predicted "whatsoever should befall his posterity unto the [page 9] latest generation." All this is recorded in section 107 of the Doctrine and Covenants (verses 53-56) [D&C 107:53-56].

The Prophet Joseph Smith said that Adam blessed his posterity because "he wanted to bring them into the presence of God." (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, sel. Joseph Fielding Smith, Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1938, p. 159.)

Here is an illuminating passage from Section 107 of the Doctrine and Covenants which tells us how Adam was able to bring himself and his righteous posterity into God's presence:

"The order of this priesthood was confirmed to be handed down from father to son, and tightly belongs to the literal descendants of the chosen seed, to whom the promises were made.

"This order was instituted in the days of Adam, and came down by lineage in [order] … that his posterity should be the chosen of the Lord, and that they should be preserved unto the end of the earth." (D&C 107:40-42; italics added.)

How did Adam bring his descendants into the presence of the Lord?

The answer: Adam and his descendants entered into the priesthood order of God. Today we would say they went to the House of the Lord and received their blessings.

The order of priesthood spoken of in the scriptures is sometimes referred to as the patriarchal order because it came down from father to son.

But this order is otherwise described in modern revelation as an order of family government where a man and woman enter into a covenant with God--just as did Adam and Eve--to be sealed for eternity, to have posterity, and to do the will and work of God throughout their mortality.

If a couple are true to their covenants, they are entitled to the blessing of the highest degree of the celestial kingdom. These covenants today can only be entered into by going to the House of the Lord.

Adam followed this order and brought his posterity into the presence of God. He is the great example for us to follow.

Enoch followed this pattern and brought the Saints of his day into the presence of God.

Noah and his son Shem likewise followed the same pattern after the flood.

Abraham, a righteous servant of God, desiring as he said, "to be a greater follower of righteousness," sought for these same blessings. Speaking of the order of the priesthood, he said: "It was conferred upon me from the fathers; it came down from the fathers, from the beginning of time … even the right of the firstborn, or the first man, who is Adam, our first father, through the fathers unto me." (Abr. 1:2-3.)

So Abraham declared: "I sought for mine appointment unto the Priesthood according to the appointment of God unto the fathers." (Abr. 1:4.)

Moses taught this order of priesthood to his people and "sought diligently to sanctify his people that they might behold the face of God;

"But they hardened their hearts and could not endure his presence; therefore, the Lord in his wrath, for his anger was kindled against them, swore that they should not enter into his rest while in the wilderness, which rest is the fulness of his glory.

"Therefore, he took Moses out of their midst, and the Holy Priesthood also." (D&C 84:23-25.)

We learn through the Joseph Smith Translation that the Lord further instructed Moses: "I will take away the priesthood out of their midst; therefore my holy order, and the ordinances thereof." (JST Ex. 34:1; italics added.)

This higher priesthood, with its attendant ordinances, was taken from Israel till the time of Jesus Christ.

My purpose in citing this background is to illustrate that this order of priesthood has been on the earth since the beginning, and it is the only means by which we can one day see the face of God and live. (See D&C 84:22.)

Between Moses and Christ only certain prophets possessed the right to the higher priesthood and the blessings that could bring men into the presence of God. One of these prophets was Elijah.

Elijah held the keys of the sealing power and did many mighty miracles in his day. He had power to seal the heavens, raise the dead, relieve the drought-stricken land, and call down fire from heaven.

He was the last prophet to hold the keys of the priesthood, according to the Prophet Joseph Smith. He was subsequently translated and taken up into heaven without tasting death.

He, as a translated being, restored the keys of this priesthood to the Savior's chief Apostles--Peter, James, and John--on the Mount of Transfiguration. But within a generation, the Church was destroyed by a major apostasy, and the blessings of the priesthood were removed from the earth.

It took a new dispensation from heaven to restore this blessing to our day.

It is significant that the first revelation given in 1823, recorded as section 2 of the Doctrine and Covenants, gave this promise about the priesthood:

"Behold, I will reveal unto you the Priesthood, by the hand of Elijah the prophet, before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the Lord.

"And he shall plant in the hearts of the children the promises made to the fathers, and the hearts of the children shall turn to their fathers.

"If it were not so, the whole earth would be utterly wasted at his coming." (D&C 2:1-3.)

What priesthood was Elijah to reveal? John the Baptist restored the keys to the Aaronic Priesthood. Peter, James, and John restored the keys of the kingdom of God. Why send Elijah?

"Because he holds the keys of the authority to administer in all the ordinances of the priesthood," or the sealing power. (Teachings, p. 172; italics added.) So said the Prophet Joseph Smith!

The Prophet Joseph said further that these keys [page 10] were "the revelations, ordinances, oracles, powers and endowments of the fulness of the Melchizedek Priesthood and of the kingdom of God on the earth." (Teachings, p. 337; italics added.)

Even though the Aaronic Priesthood and Melchizedek Priesthood had been restored to the earth, the Lord urged the Saints to build a temple to receive the keys by which this order of priesthood could be administered on the earth again, "for there [was] not a place found on earth that he may come to and restore again that which was lost … even the fulness of the priesthood." (D&C 124:28; italics added.)

Again the Prophet Joseph said: "If a man gets a fullness of the priesthood of God he has to get it in the same way that Jesus Christ obtained it, and that was by keeping all the commandments and obeying all the ordinances of the house of the Lord." (Teachings, p. 308.)

So the Kirtland Temple was completed at great sacrifice to the Saints.

Then, on 3 April 1836, the Lord Jesus Christ and three other heavenly beings appeared in this holy edifice. One of these heavenly messengers was Elijah, to whom the Lord said he had "committed the keys of the power of turning the hearts of the fathers to the children, and the hearts of the children to the fathers, that the whole earth may not be smitten with a curse." (D&C 27:9.)

Elijah brought the keys of sealing powers--that power which seals a man to a woman and seals their posterity to them endlessly, that which seals their forefathers to them all the way back to Adam. This is the power and order that Elijah revealed--that same order of priesthood which God gave to Adam and to all the ancient patriarchs which followed after him.

And this is why the Lord said to the Prophet Joseph Smith, "For verily I say unto you, the keys of the dispensation, which ye have received, have come down from the fathers, and last of all, being sent down from heaven unto you." (D&C 112:32.)

In a later revelation the Lord explained:

"In the celestial glory there are three heavens or degrees;

"And in order to obtain the highest, a man must enter into this order of the priesthood [meaning the new and everlasting covenant of marriage];

"And if he does not, he cannot obtain it.

"He may enter into the other, but that is the end of his kingdom; he cannot have an increase." (D&C 131:1-4; italics added.)

When our children obey the Lord and go to the temple to receive their blessings and enter into the marriage covenant, they enter into the same order of the priesthood that God instituted in the very beginning with father Adam.

This order entitles them to the same blessings of Abraham, of whom the Lord said that he "hath entered into his exaltation and sitteth upon his throne." (D&C 132:29.)

Then He significantly added: "This promise is yours also, because ye are of Abraham." (D&C 132:31.)

So again I emphasize: This order of priesthood can only be entered into when we comply with all the commandments of God and seek the blessings of the fathers as did Abraham by going to our Father's house. They are received in no other place on this earth!

I hope you would teach this truth about the temple to your children and your grandchildren. Go to the temple--our Father's house--to receive the blessings of your fathers that you may be entitled to the highest blessings of the priesthood. "For without this no man can see the face of God, even the Father, and live." (D&C 84:22.)

Our Father's house is a house of order. We go to His house to enter into that order of priesthood which will entitle us to all that the Father hath, if we are faithful. For as the Lord has revealed in modern times, Abraham's seed are "lawful heirs" to the priesthood. (See D&C 86:8-11.)

Now let me say something else to all who can worthily go to the House of the Lord. When you attend the temple and perform the ordinances that pertain to the House of the Lord, certain blessings will come to you:

•You will receive the spirit of Elijah, which will turn your hearts to your spouse, to your children, and to your forebears.

•You will love your family with a deeper love than you have loved before.

•Your hearts will be turned to your fathers and theirs to you.

•You will be endowed with power from on high as the Lord has promised.

•You will receive the key of the knowledge of God. (See D&C 84:19.) You will learn how you can be like Him. Even the power of godliness will be manifest to you. (See D&C 84:20.)

•You will be doing a great service to those who have passed to the other side of the veil in order that they might be "judged according to men in the flesh, but live according to God in the spirit." (D&C 138:34.)

Such are the blessings of the temple and the blessings of frequently attending the temple.

So I say at this centennial commemoration of the Logan Temple: God bless Israel! God bless those of our forebears who constructed this holy edifice. God bless us to teach our children and our grandchildren what great blessings await them by going to the temple. God bless us to receive all the blessings revealed by Elijah the prophet so that our callings and election will be made sure.

I testify with all my soul to the truth of this message and pray that the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob will bless modern Israel with the compelling desire to seek all the blessings of the fathers in the House of our Heavenly Father.

Key Ordinance is Marriage and having children.  2 people agree to come together to build a kingdom of God with children.  Marriage is the key to Godhood; turn the couple to the goal of the kingdom.

Wash = Clean, Anoint = Consecrate, this leads to the Endowment

9 covenants 3 are interconnected

 

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 107:53.) – First Temple

 

53 Three years previous to the death of Adam, he called Seth, Enos, Cainan, Mahalaleel, Jared, Enoch, and Methuselah, who were all high priests, with the residue of his posterity who were righteous, into the valley of Adam-ondi-Ahman, and there bestowed upon them his last blessing.

 

 

Adam-ondi-Ahman

 

This term is unique in this dispensation to Latter-day Saints and is a remnant of the Adamic language (the original language taught to Adam by God). In this valley, declared by the Prophet Joseph Smith to be located at Spring Hill, Daviess County, Missouri, Adam called together his children and blessed them three years before his death, and here Adam shall again come to visit his people.

 

Selected Quotations

 

"We have then an understanding that [Adam-ondi-Ahman] was the place where Adam dwelt. . . . 'Ondi-Ahman' . . . means the place where Adam dwelt. 'Ahman' signifies God. The whole term means Valley of God where Adam dwelt. It is the original language spoken by Adam, as revealed to the Prophet Joseph." (Orson Pratt, JD 18:342.)

 

"The valley of Adam-ondi-Ahman . . . was located on the western hemisphere of our globe . . . about fifty miles north of Jackson County, in the State of Missouri. The Lord has revealed to us that Adam dwelt there towards the latter period of his probation. Whether he had lived in that region of country from the earliest period of his existence on the earth, we know not. He might have lived thousands of miles distant in his early days." (Orson Pratt, JD 16:48.)

 

"I saw Adam in the valley of Adam-ondi-Ahman. He called together his children and blessed them with a patriarchal blessing. The Lord appeared in their midst, and he (Adam) blessed them all and foretold what should befall them to the latest generation." (Joseph Smith, HC 3:388.)

 

"Wednesday, Oct. 3rd, the camp traveled to Ambrosial Creek where they were visited by the Prophet, his counselors Sidney Rigdon and Hyrum Smith, and Elder Brigham Young. That evening one of the brethren said, by the Spirit of the Lord:

 

"'Brethren, your long and tedious journey is now ended; you are now on the public square of Adam-ondi-Ahman. This is the place where Adam blessed his posterity, when they rose up and called him Michael, the Prince, the Archangel, and he being full of the Holy Ghost predicted what should befall his posterity to the latest generations.' (See D&C 107:53D&C 107:53-55.)" (Joseph Fielding Smith, CHMR 2:106.)

 

 

(Daniel H. Ludlow, A Companion to Your Study of the New Testament: The Four Gospels [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1982], 7.)

 

 

 

 

Law of Consecration

 

 

Economic Portion is written in D&C 42 “The Law of the Gospel”

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 42:30-39.)

 

30 And behold, thou wilt remember the poor, and consecrate of thy properties for their support that which thou hast to impart unto them, with a covenant and a deed which cannot be broken.

 

31 And inasmuch as ye impart of your substance unto the poor, ye will do it unto me; and they shall be laid before the bishop of my church and his counselors, two of the elders, or high priests, such as he shall appoint or has appointed and set apart for that purpose.

 

32 And it shall come to pass, that after they are laid before the bishop of my church, and after that he has received these testimonies concerning the consecration of the properties of my church, that they cannot be taken from the church, agreeable to my commandments, every man shall be made accountable unto me, a steward over his own property, or that which he has received by consecration, as much as is sufficient for himself and family.

 

33 And again, if there shall be properties in the hands of the church, or any individuals of it, more than is necessary for their support after this first consecration, which is a residue to be consecrated unto the bishop, it shall be kept to administer to those who have not, from time to time, that every man who has need may be amply supplied and receive according to his wants.

 

34 Therefore, the residue shall be kept in my storehouse, to administer to the poor and the needy, as shall be appointed by the high council of the church, and the bishop and his council;

 

35 And for the purpose of purchasing lands for the public benefit of the church, and building houses of worship, and building up of the New Jerusalem which is hereafter to be revealed—

 

36 That my covenant people may be gathered in one in that day when I shall come to my temple. And this I do for the salvation of my people.

 

37 And it shall come to pass, that he that sinneth and repenteth not shall be cast out of the church, and shall not receive again that which he has consecrated unto the poor and the needy of my church, or in other words, unto me—

 

38 For inasmuch as ye do it unto the least of these, ye do it unto me.

 

39 For it shall come to pass, that which I spake by the mouths of my prophets shall be fulfilled; for I will consecrate of the riches of those who embrace my gospel among the Gentiles unto the poor of my people who are of the house of Israel.

 

 

These are the principles of the economic portion, the consecration of property for the poor to the Bishop and priesthood quorums (Elders and High Priests).

 

Scriptural purpose of the law:

 

  1. Take care of the poor
  2. Purchase land
  3. Build church houses
  4. New Jerusalem

 

Doctrine and principles stay the same, but policies and programs change at various times according to implementation.

 

(Moses 7:18.) – Enoch’s Zion

 

18 And the Lord called his people ZION, because they were of one heart and one mind, and dwelt in righteousness; and there was no poor among them.

 

  1. One Heart
  2. One Mind
  3. Righteous
  4. No poor among them

 

(JST Genesis 14:37-40.) – Melchizedek’s Zion (A High Priest)

 

37 And he lifted up his voice, and he blessed Abram, being the high priest, and the keeper of the storehouse of God;

 

38 Him whom God had appointed to receive tithes for the poor.

 

39 Wherefore, Abram paid unto him tithes of all that he had, of all the riches which he possessed, which God had given him more than that which he had need.

 

40 And it came to pass, that God blessed Abram, and gave unto him riches, and honor, and lands for an everlasting possession; according to the covenant which he had made, and according to the blessing wherewith Melchizedek had blessed him.

 

 

  1. Keeper of the Storehouse of God
  2. Received tithes for the poor
  3. Abram gave of his surplus to the Storehouse

 

(Acts 2:42-45.)

 

42 And they continued stedfastly in the apostles' doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers.

 

43 And fear came upon every soul: and many wonders and signs were done by the apostles.

 

44 And all that believed were together, and had all things common;

 

45 And sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need.

 

 

(Acts 4:32-37.) – Peter’s Zion

 

32 And the multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of one soul: neither said any of them that ought of the things which he possessed was his own; but they had all things common.

 

33 And with great power gave the apostles witness of the resurrection of the Lord Jesus: and great grace was upon them all.

 

34 Neither was there any among them that lacked: for as many as were possessors of lands or houses sold them, and brought the prices of the things that were sold,

 

35 And laid them down at the apostles' feet: and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need.

 

36 And Joses, who by the apostles was surnamed Barnabas, (which is, being interpreted, The son of consolation,) a Levite, and of the country of Cyprus,

 

37 Having land, sold it, and brought the money, and laid it at the apostles' feet.

 

 

  1. All things in common
  2. Sold possessions and given to the common Storehouse, to the Apostles to distribute
  3. One heart and one soul

 

 

Various Implementations of the Law of Consecration in this Dispensation

 

Principles are the same, consecration of property for the poor, given to the Bishop, the surplus was consecrated to the church, to help the poor and build up the kingdom of God.

 

All things belong to the Lord, everything we have is a stewardship given to us by the Lord.

 

D&C 51 – Law of Consecration and Stewardship (Ohio and Missouri)

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 51:3, 13)

 

3 Wherefore, let my servant Edward Partridge, and those whom he has chosen, in whom I am well pleased, appoint unto this people their portions, every man equal according to his family, according to his circumstances and his wants and needs.

 

13 And again, let the bishop appoint a storehouse unto this church; and let all things both in money and in meat, which are more than is needful for the wants of this people, be kept in the hands of the bishop.

 

Appoint portions equal according to the family, circumstances, wants and needs.

 

Bishop appoint from the storehouse

 

D&C 56 – Law of Consecration and Stewardship (Ohio and Missouri)

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 56:16-18.)

 

16 Wo unto you rich men, that will not give your substance to the poor, for your riches will canker your souls; and this shall be your lamentation in the day of visitation, and of judgment, and of indignation: The harvest is past, the summer is ended, and my soul is not saved!

 

17 Wo unto you poor men, whose hearts are not broken, whose spirits are not contrite, and whose bellies are not satisfied, and whose hands are not stayed from laying hold upon other men's goods, whose eyes are full of greediness, and who will not labor with your own hands!

 

18 But blessed are the poor who are pure in heart, whose hearts are broken, and whose spirits are contrite, for they shall see the kingdom of God coming in power and great glory unto their deliverance; for the fatness of the earth shall be theirs.

 

 

Wo unto the rich who won’t give to the poor

 

Wo unto the poor whose hearts are not broken nor their spirits contrite.  Who are greedy and won’t work.

 

Blessed are the poor who are pure in heart, their hearts are broken and their spirits contrite.

 

Edward Partridge was the Bishop in Missouri; Newell K. Whitney was the Bishop in Ohio.

 

D&C 72 – Law of Consecration and Stewardship (Ohio and Missouri)

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 72:4-5.)

 

 And verily in this thing ye have done wisely, for it is required of the Lord, at the hand of every steward, to render an account of his stewardship, both in time and in eternity.

 

4 For he who is faithful and wise in time is accounted worthy to inherit the mansions prepared for him of my Father.

 

5 Verily I say unto you, the elders of the church in this part of my vineyard shall render an account of their stewardship unto the bishop, who shall be appointed of me in this part of my vineyard.

 

Render an account of his stewardship both in time and in eternity.

 

Part of our stewardship – Declaring our tithing status every December to our Bishop

 

                                         Home teaching and visiting teaching

 

Study the scriptures and the words of the Prophets, including the lesson                        manuals about the Prophets.

 

The role of a Bishop in Zion;

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 72:9-12, 16-20.)

 

9 The word of the Lord, in addition to the law which has been given, making known the duty of the bishop who has been ordained unto the church in this part of the vineyard, which is verily this—

 

10 To keep the Lord's storehouse; to receive the funds of the church in this part of the vineyard;

 

11 To take an account of the elders as before has been commanded; and to administer to their wants, who shall pay for that which they receive, inasmuch as they have wherewith to pay;

 

12 That this also may be consecrated to the good of the church, to the poor and needy.

 

16 And now, verily I say unto you, that as every elder in this part of the vineyard must give an account of his stewardship unto the bishop in this part of the vineyard—

 

17 A certificate from the judge or bishop in this part of the vineyard, unto the bishop in Zion, rendereth every man acceptable, and answereth all things, for an inheritance, and to be received as a wise steward and as a faithful laborer;

 

18 Otherwise he shall not be accepted of the bishop of Zion.

 

19 And now, verily I say unto you, let every elder who shall give an account unto the bishop of the church in this part of the vineyard be recommended by the church or churches, in which he labors, that he may render himself and his accounts approved in all things.

 

20 And again, let my servants who are appointed as stewards over the literary concerns of my church have claim for assistance upon the bishop or bishops in all things—

 

  1. Bishop to keep Lord’s storehouse
  2. An account of the Elders and administer to their wants
  3. Consecrated to the good of the church to the poor and needy
  4. Wise steward and faithful laborer, to help others become self reliant

 

D&C 74 = 1 Corinthians 7:14

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 74:6-7.)

 

6 That their children might remain without circumcision; and that the tradition might be done away, which saith that little children are unholy; for it was had among the Jews;

 

7 But little children are holy, being sanctified through the atonement of Jesus Christ; and this is what the scriptures mean.

 

D&C 76 – Given after the Prophet translated John 5:29, he with Sidney saw 6 visions

 

20-24 – God and Christ

25-29 – Free of Lucifer     the 2 Influences

30-49 - Sons of Perdition as a result of mortal experiences

50-70, 92-96 – Vision of the Celestial kingdom

71-80 – Terrestrial kingdom

81-88 – Telestial kingdom

 

Christ travels to each kingdom (other worlds) with additional information.  The faithful may come to understand the rest which could not be written.

 

But there is an even more marked, pronounced, and significant difference between various types or levels of truth than simply their relative importance. There is a difference as to how truths are comprehended by the mind of man. Most truths we deal with in mortality are perceived through our natural senses, but there are certain truths necessary to the redemption of one's soul that are perceived only by revelation through the Holy Ghost. These truths are not perceived by intellectual activity alone, but are spiritually discerned. They are, in the language of the Lord, "hidden treasures" of knowledge (D&C 89:19). Or as Paul said, "If our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost"; i.e., hidden to those without the Spirit (2 Cor. 4:3).

 

And again in the words of Paul, speaking of spiritual truths:

 

God hath revealed them unto us by his Spirit: for the Spirit searcheth all things, yea, the deep things of God. . . . Even so the things of God knoweth no man, except he has the Spirit of God.

 

But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned (JST 1 Cor. 2:10-11, 14).

 

Note that Paul does not say that the natural man simply does not know the things of God; he says that the natural man cannot know them. The things of the Spirit are just as real as are the things of the earth, but they are in a different sphere, and fallen man's ability to perceive and understand them is so limited that only by the inspiration of the Holy Ghost can he perceive them.

 

This same principle is taught in Doctrine and Covenants 76:115-117, wherein Joseph Smith and Sidney Rigdon explain why they did not write more of what they saw in the vision. In the first place, they said they were forbidden to do so (v. 115). Second, they explained:

 

Neither is man capable to make them known, for they are only to be seen and understood by the power of the Holy Spirit, which God bestows on those who love him, and purify themselves before him;

 

To whom he grants this privilege of seeing and knowing for themselves (vv. 116-17).

 

This principle is also illustrated in the Savior's words to Peter. When Jesus asked the Twelve who men said that he was, they replied that some said he was Elijah or John or Jeremiah, or one of the prophets, etc. But in answer to "whom say ye that I am?" Peter said, "Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God." Jesus' response illustrates both these two categories of truth: "Flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven" (Matthew 16:15-17). These passages of scripture seem to create a hierarchy of truths, and seem to say not all truth is available to all persons just for the asking. This stratification may be the meaning of D&C 93:30, wherein the Lord says: "All truth is independent in that sphere in which God has placed it, to act for itself." Does this passage suggest that there are different categories (spheres) of truth, and that each is independent of the other? In other words, are there truths common to our mortal fallen world, and other truths peculiar to spiritual things? We have already learned that there are some areas of truth that the natural man cannot know because he does not have the mechanism for acquiring them. Spiritual truth is only made known by the Spirit to those who believe, repent, and prepare themselves to obtain it.

 

Gaining the particular knowledge that saves is so important that "It is impossible for a man to be saved in ignorance" (D&C 131:6). Consequently, "a man is saved no faster than he gets knowledge" of these special truths (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith 217; see also 301, 305, 331). The knowledge that a person possesses is fundamental to his thinking and his state of mind. What he doesn't know can't help him. And contrary to a popular saying, what he doesn't know can hurt him. Without knowledge he lacks the conviction and the determination that the right knowledge would have given to him. Even the approach of great danger, if it is not perceived, has no effect on the consciousness or emotion of the individual. We see millions of people in the world today unaware and unconcerned about their relationship to God. We read that it is impossible for a person without a correct knowledge of God and his attributes to exercise the degree of faith necessary for life and salvation (Lectures on Faith 3:1-4, 19). A person cannot have perfect faith in something he doesn't know anything about. Since this is true, and the scriptures say it is, we are all obliged to learn some spiritual truths if we want to be saved in the celestial kingdom. We cannot even have a testimony that Jesus is the Christ, except by the revelation of the Holy Ghost. Saving truths are divine, not natural, knowledge.

 

Since all truths are not of equal value, and since those truths most necessary in the process of salvation are gained only through the Holy Spirit of God, one obviously stands in jeopardy if he does not gain those particular truths through that particular Spirit while in this life. Job said that the things of God are "past finding out" (Job 9:10), and his "friend" Zophar asks, "Canst thou by searching find out God?" (Job 11:7). Obviously, the correct answer to Zophar's question is, "No! The things of God do not yield themselves to searching alone." No one can obtain the things of God except by revelation, and God must reveal himself or else he remains forever unknown. Jacob wrote: "How unsearchable are the depths of the mysteries of him. . . . And no man knoweth of his ways save it be revealed unto him; wherefore, brethren, despise not the revelations of God" (Jacob 4:8).

 

A description of the different kinds of truth could be placed in a paraphrase of the words used by Paul when he was writing about the different kinds of flesh and the different degrees of glory (see 1 Cor. 15:39-44). Hence, we could say,

 

All truth is not the same truth, for there is one kind of truth common among men, and another kind that pertains to God. There is also a truth that is gained through the mortal senses, and another that is gained only through the Spirit. There is one kind of truth that comes from God, and another kind that comes from men, for one truth differeth from another truth in glory. So also is the truth that is had in the earth. There is a natural truth and there is a spiritual truth.

 

But truth of a spiritual nature is also different in yet another way. Spiritual truth is not simply bare fact or mere information. The scriptures speak of light and truth as companions. The glory of God, which is intelligence, is spoken of as both light and truth, and not just truth alone (D&C 93:36). The presence of light in company with knowledge seems to be an essential quality that distinguishes God's truth (i.e. the knowledge that saves) from the type of truth that is mere fact, and that even a natural or a wicked man could gain by research and study.

 

 

(Monte S. Nyman and Charles D. Tate, Jr., eds., Second Nephi: The Doctrinal Structure [Provo: BYU Religious Studies Center, 1989], 193 - 194.)

 

 

Those who receive the Second Comforter see the visions of eternity and have a perfect knowledge of the mysteries of the kingdom. "And to them will I reveal all mysteries, yea, all the hidden mysteries of my kingdom from days of old," saith the Lord, "and for ages to come, will I make known unto them the good pleasure of my will concerning all things pertaining to my kingdom. Yea, even the wonders of eternity shall they know, and things to come will I show them, even the things of many generations. And their wisdom shall be great and their understanding reach to heaven; and before them the wisdom of the wise shall perish, and the understanding of the prudent shall come to naught. For by my Spirit will I enlighten them, and by my power will I make known unto them the secrets of my will—yea, even those things which eye has not seen, nor ear heard, nor yet entered into the heart of man." (D&C 76:7-10.)

 

Among those who received the Second Comforter are the three Nephites, whom we have been using as a pattern and type of what men will be like in the Millennium. These three American apostles "were caught up into heaven, and saw and heard unspeakable things. And it was forbidden them that they should utter; neither was it given unto them power that they could utter the things which they saw and heard; and whether they were in the body or out of the body, they could not tell; for it did seem unto them like a transfiguration of them, that they were changed from this body of flesh into an immortal state, that they could behold the things of God." (3 Ne. 28:13-15.)

 

Now, having in mind these concepts about the Second Comforter, and knowing that all those who so obtain have their callings and elections made sure, let us catch the vision, if we can, of one of the great prophetic utterances of Jeremiah. "Behold, the days come, saith the Lord"—and we shall soon show that the days involved are millennial—"that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah." Hear it and mark it well: it will be a new covenant, a new and an everlasting covenant; it will be the fulness of the everlasting gospel, not in name only, but in fact and in deed, in active operation in the lives of men. It will be "not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the Lord." When the Lord brought Israel out of Egypt he offered them the fulness of the gospel. Moses held the Melchizedek Priesthood, and his people could have lived the higher gospel law had they chosen to do so. But they broke not only the gospel covenant but also the Mosaic or lesser covenant, at least in large measure.

 

"But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; after those days, saith the Lord, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people." There will be a day when latter-day Israel will serve the Lord with all their hearts and make themselves worthy of the fulness of his glory. "And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the Lord: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more." (Jer. 31:31-34.)

 

Joseph Smith tells us that Jeremiah's prophecy will be fulfilled during the Millennium. The Prophet speaks of making one's calling and election sure and of the sealing power whereby "we may be sealed up unto the day of redemption." Then he says: "This principle ought (in its proper place) to be taught, for God hath not revealed anything to Joseph, but what He will make known unto the Twelve, and even the least Saint may know all things as fast as he is able to bear them, for the day must come when no man need say to his neighbor, Know ye the Lord; for all shall know Him (who remain) from the least to the greatest." These are the very words of Jeremiah's prophecy; and they will find their complete fulfillment among those "who remain," those who abide the day, those who gain an inheritance on the new earth when it receives its paradisiacal glory again. "How is this to be done?" the Prophet asks. How shall men come to know the Lord and understand all the hidden mysteries of his kingdom without a teacher? His answer: "It is to be done by this sealing power, and the other Comforter spoken of, which will be manifest by revelation." (Teachings, p. 149.)

 

Men will know God in the millennial day because they see him. He will teach them face to face. They will know the mysteries of his kingdom because they are caught up to the third heaven, as was Paul. They will receive the Second Comforter. The millennial day is the day of the Second Comforter, and whereas but few have been blessed with this divine association in times past, great hosts will be so blessed in times to come.

 

What, then, will be the nature of worship during the Millennium? It will be pure and perfect, and through it men will become inheritors of eternal life. And in this connection, be it known that it is the privilege of the saints today to separate themselves from the world and to receive millennial blessings in their lives. And any person who today abides the laws that will be kept during the Millennium will receive, here and now, the spirit and blessings of the Millennium in his life, even though he is surrounded by a world of sin and evil. And so we say, in the language of Joseph Smith as he finished the record of the vision of the three degrees of glory: "Great and marvelous are the works of the Lord, and the mysteries of his kingdom which he showed unto us, which surpass all understanding in glory, and in might, and in dominion; Which he commanded us we should not write while we were yet in the Spirit, and are not lawful for man to utter; Neither is man capable to make them known, for they are only to be seen and understood by the power of the Holy Spirit, which God bestows on those who love him, and purify themselves before him; To whom he grants this privilege of seeing and knowing for themselves; That through the power and manifestation of the Spirit, while in the flesh, they may be able to bear his presence in the world of glory. And to God and the Lamb be glory, and honor, and dominion forever and ever. Amen." (D&C 76:116D&C 76:114-119.)

 

 

(Bruce R. McConkie, The Millennial Messiah: The Second Coming of the Son of Man [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1982], 680.)

 

 

Baptismal Covenant:

 

  1. Take upon yourself the name of Christ

 

Taking upon Us the Name of Jesus Christ
Elder Dallin H. Oaks
Of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles
Ensign, May 1985, pp. 80-83

 

When the priest offers the scriptural prayer on the bread at the sacrament table, he prays that all who partake may "witness" unto God, the Eternal Father, "that they are willing to take upon them the name of thy Son." (D&C 20:77; Moro. 4:3.) This witness has several different meanings.

It causes us to renew the covenant we made in the waters of baptism to take upon us the name of Jesus Christ and serve him to the end. We also take upon us his name as we publicly profess our belief in him, as we fulfill our obligations as members of his Church, and as we do the work of his kingdom.

But there is something beyond these familiar meanings, because what we witness is not that we take upon us his name but that we are willing to do so. In this sense, our witness relates to some future event or status whose attainment is not self-assumed, but depends on the authority or initiative of the Savior himself.

Scriptural references to the name of Jesus Christ often signify the authority of Jesus Christ. In that sense, our willingness to take upon us his name signifies our willingness to take upon us the authority of Jesus Christ in the sacred ordinances of the temple, and to receive the highest blessings available through his authority when he chooses to confer them upon us.

Finally, our willingness to take upon us the name of Jesus Christ affirms our commitment to do all that we can to be counted among those whom he will choose to stand at his right hand and be called by his name at the last day. In this sacred sense, our witness that we are willing to take upon us the name of Jesus Christ constitutes our declaration of candidacy for exaltation in the celestial kingdom. Exaltation is eternal life, "the greatest of all the gifts of God." (D&C 14:7.)

That is what we should ponder as we partake of the sacred emblems of the sacrament. As we do so, we glory in the mission of the risen Lord, who lived and taught and suffered and died and rose again that all mankind might have immortality and eternal life. Of this I testify in the sacred name of the Lord Jesus Christ, whose witness I am, amen.

 

  1. You are an agent of Christ – to do His will and keep His commandments.  We will receive for our salary if worthy, mansions prepared by our Heavenly Father.

 

  1. Agents are accountable for their stewardship

 

  1. Agency – the power to act for Christ.  We are free to choose good or evil and once exercised we are an agent to one or the other.

 

  1. We have the right to choose, but not the right to choose evil.

 

  1. Only God can declare moral rights and consequences.

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 78:3-10.) – United Firm or Order

 

3 For verily I say unto you, the time has come, and is now at hand; and behold, and lo, it must needs be that there be an organization of my people, in regulating and establishing the affairs of the storehouse for the poor of my people, both in this place and in the land of Zion—

 

4 For a permanent and everlasting establishment and order unto my church, to advance the cause, which ye have espoused, to the salvation of man, and to the glory of your Father who is in heaven;

 

5 That you may be equal in the bonds of heavenly things, yea, and earthly things also, for the obtaining of heavenly things.

 

6 For if ye are not equal in earthly things ye cannot be equal in obtaining heavenly things;

 

7 For if you will that I give unto you a place in the celestial world, you must prepare yourselves by doing the things which I have commanded you and required of you.

 

8 And now, verily thus saith the Lord, it is expedient that all things be done unto my glory, by you who are joined together in this order;

 

9 Or, in other words, let my servant Newel K. Whitney and my servant Joseph Smith, Jun., and my servant Sidney Rigdon sit in council with the saints which are in Zion;

 

10 Otherwise Satan seeketh to turn their hearts away from the truth, that they become blinded and understand not the things which are prepared for them.

 

Doctrine and Covenants 78:3-5

 

What was the united order?

 

In the revelation recorded in Doctrine and Covenants 78, the Lord called some of the leaders of the Church to unite by covenant to form what became known as the "united order" (D&C 104:1), or "united firm." This was an administrative body to coordinate and operate various business enterprises related to the law of consecration.

 

The phrase "united order" has also frequently been used as a synonym for "law of consecration." Cooperative ventures in Utah during the 1870s were also called "united orders" but were not the same as the law of consecration.

 

 

(Richard O. Cowan, Answers to Your Questions About the Doctrine and Covenants [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1996], 95

United under the Laws of the Celestial Kingdom Consecration, Stewardship, and the United Order, 1830-1838

(D&C 42, 51, 78, 82, 83, 104, etc.)

 

MILTON V. BACKMAN, JR. AND KEITH W. PERKINS

 

Temporal welfare has been a major concern of people in all ages. Early in this dispensation the Prophet Joseph Smith became concerned about this problem; partly because of these concerns the Prophet went to the Lord. Subsequently, the law of consecration or the United Order (as called in some revelations) was unfolded. fn

 

Like many other principles of the gospel, the law of consecration and stewardship of property was gradually made known to the Prophet Joseph Smith, who in turn gradually disclosed these principles to Latter-day Saints, line upon line, precept upon precept. Some members of the Church were granted an opportunity to live this higher law, but most failed. The law was misinterpreted, misunderstood, neglected, and eventually replaced by a less comprehensive law, the law of tithing (D&C 119).

 

In one of the revelations instructing the Saints to move to Ohio (see D&C 38:32), Joseph was told that the Lord would reveal to him a new divine law in that state. Upon his arrival, Joseph learned that serious problems were plaguing members of "the Family." A group of people, seeking to organize themselves according to the pattern in the New Testament ("all things in common"), had established a "common stock" social order on the Isaac Morley farm. They called themselves "the Family." The pooling of property had led some to believe that everything should be shared, including clothes; it was felt that what belonged to one belonged to all. fn On 9 February 1831, twelve elders approached Joseph Smith and inquired if the time was ripe for the unfolding of the "law" that had been mentioned in the New York revelation. In their presence, the Prophet sought divine instruction and recorded most of what is today section 42 of the Doctrine and Covenants. fn

 

Section 42 of the Doctrine and Covenants contains a series of laws and policies, including such matters as preaching the gospel, moral laws and commandments (including a number of the ten commandments), administering to the sick, location of the New Jerusalem and other mysteries of the kingdom to be revealed, and punishment for transgression. This revelation, along with a number of others, also contains a partial description of what is sometimes called the United Order or the law of consecration.

 

Guiding Principles of the United Order

 

The revelations of the Lord pertaining to consecration or the United Order, contain six major categories that are the guiding principles under which this law was to operate. These six categories are: (1) the earth is the Lord's, (2) all people are children of God, (3) free agency, (4) management by a central agency, (5) specified behavior patterns, and (6) private ownership of property.

 

Let us examine (in outline form) some details from the Doctrine and Covenants and Joseph Smith's History of the Church under these six general categories. In doing so, we may gain a much clearer understanding of how the law of consecration or the United Order was to be lived, and also the principles which guided it.

 

I. The Earth Is the Lord's

 

A. Lord created the earth (14:9; 104:14).

 

B. Earth is rich; there is enough and to spare for all people (38:17; 104:17).

 

C. Riches of eternity promised by the Lord (38:39).

 

D. Goods given to the poor are given to the Lord (42:31).

 

E. Poor provided for in the Lord's own way (104:15-16).

 

F. Lord is no respector of persons, rich or poor (38:16).

 

II. All People Are Children of God

 

A. Esteem brother as self (38:24-25).

 

B. Be one or not the Lord's (38:27).

 

C. We are responsible for the poor, needy, widow, and orphan so there will be no suffering (38:35; 83:1-6).

 

D. To be equal spiritually we must be equal temporally (78:6).

 

E. Poor will be exalted and the rich humbled (104:16-17).

 

III. Free Agency

 

A. Free agency is basic to the law (104:17).

 

B. Stewardships were received according to just wants, needs, family, and circumstances (51:3; 82:17).

 

C. A person leaving the order retained his stewardship (51:5).

 

D. Saints had the privilege of organizing according to the Lord's law (51:15).

 

E. If the bishop and an individual did not agree on the amount the individual received as a stewardship, the contributor had the right of appeal (HC 1:364-65).

 

IV. Management by a Central Agency

 

A. Properties were consecrated to the Lord through the Lord's agents, the bishop and his two counselors, with a covenant and deed which could not be broken (42:30-31; 58:35-36).

 

B. Stewardships received by written deed from a bishop (51:4).

 

C. Surplus property, money, and food were placed in a bishop's storehouse (42:33-35; 51:13).

 

D. Surpluses provided food and clothing for poor and needy and were used to purchase additional property (42:33-35; 58:37, 49; 83:1-6).

 

E. Deeds conveyed according to the laws of the land ( 51:6).

 

F. Two treasuries in Order: the sacred treasury and "another treasury" (104:60-72).

 

V. Specified Behavior Patterns

 

A. Labor with own hands (38:40)

 

B. Deal honestly and receive alike ( 51:4).

 

C. Avoid pride (42:40).

 

D. Avoid idleness (42:42; 56:17).

 

E. Pay for what was received (42:54).

 

F. Pay debts (104:78).

 

G. Improve talents and gain additional talents for the benefit of all (82:18).

 

H. Be faithful, just, and wise (51:19).

 

I. Give an accounting of stewardships to the Bishop (42:32; 72:16-18; 104:11-13).

 

J. Seek interest of neighbor and glorify God (82:19).

 

VI. Private Ownership of Property

 

A. Pay for what was received from another branch of the Order (51:11).

 

B. System not communal (HC 1:146-47; 3:28; 4:33; 6:37, 38).

 

C. Surpluses given to Church after the needs and wants of an individual or family are provided for (42:32-34).

 

D. Everyone to provide for own needs (75:28).

 

E. Saints to stand independent of all other creatures (78:14).

 

F. Initiative rewarded (82:17-18).

 

G. If individual left the order, he had no claim on original consecration, but the stewardship was retained by individual (42:37; 51:5).

 

The law of consecration and stewardship, or the United Order, was unfolded in the 1830s as the Welfare Program has been revealed in our day for similar reasons: to provide for the poor, needy, widows, and orphans, and to help the Saints obtain unity.

 

On 4 February 1831 Edward Partridge had been called by revelation as the first bishop of the Church. He was commanded to sell his property and devote full time to the "labors of the church" (see D&C 41:9). Sections 42 and 51 provided Bishop Partridge with instructions regarding his responsibilities.

 

Problems in Implementing the Law

 

A variety of problems interfered with the immediate application of the law of consecration in Ohio in 1831. John Whitmer, who had been called by revelation on 8 March 1831 as Church Historian (see D&C 47:1-4), wrote that the time had not yet come for the law to be fully established. The disciples, he explained, were scattered and were small in number, and many did not understand and would not accept this law. fn There were other reasons, however, that should be considered. Between the end of October and December 1830 approximately nine families living in Kirtland joined the Church. These individuals owned 132 acres of land in that township. Most of these converts were living on the Isaac Morley farm. If all of the land owned by the Kirtland Saints had been divided among these nine families, each family would have received less than fifteen acres. Although Newel K. Whitney owned a profitable mercantile store and did not need as much land as most, a majority of the Kirtland converts were farmers; fifteen acres were not sufficient to support an average family. fn One problem encountered in organizing communal societies was a tendency for poor people to be attracted to such movements and for the wealthy to shun such enterprises. For example, one possible problem encountered by the Family was that some took advantage of Isaac Morley, who had undoubtedly contributed more than others. That which belonged to one was considered the property of all, arousing jealousy and bitter feelings. fn In the revelation that Joseph Smith received on 9 February 1831, members learned that they were not to live in a communal type order, but they were to be stewards over their own property (see D&C 42:32). However, as explained, one of the probable reasons that the United Order was not immediately put into use in Kirtland was because members did not own sufficient land in that town for a satisfactory redistribution to have occurred.

 

Arrival of New York Saints in Ohio

 

The problem of applying this law was compounded by the migration of about two hundred Latter-day Saints to Ohio between January and June of 1831. At the call of a Prophet, these converts had sold their farms, disposed of much of their property, and traveled to Ohio (see D&C 37:3; 38:32). In the initial publication of section 42 in the Book of Commandments, there was a reference to members in Ohio assisting Bishop Partridge in locating places for these immigrants (see Book of Commandments 44:57). Some of the first Saints to arrive settled in Kirtland, including members of the Joseph Smith, Sr., family and the Peter Whitmer family. Apparently there was not enough money nor land available in that township to care for the needs of the New York Saints. John Whitmer observed that because of the lack of preparation to receive the Saints from the east, Bishop Partridge sought advice from Joseph concerning where they should settle. Whitmer added that some Easterners believed that Kirtland was the "place of gathering, even the place of the New Jerusalem spoken of in the Book of Mormon." Therefore, John Whitmer recorded that the "Lord spake unto Joseph Smith," resulting in what is today section 48 of our Doctrine and Covenants. fn Members were told that the place of the New Jerusalem had not yet been revealed and the Ohio Saints were to share their surplus property with the "eastern brethren." If needed, the immigrants were to purchase additional property (see D&C 48:2-5).

 

Some of the economic problems of the Ohio Saints seemed to be alleviated when Leman Copley, a former Shaker who lived in Thompson—located about twenty miles east of Kirtland—joined the Church. Copley granted the immigrants the right to settle on his farm. Consequently, most of the New York Saints established their homes there. fn

 

The Thompson Saints

 

As the New York Saints continued to arrive, Bishop Partridge sought additional advice from Joseph concerning the United Order. The Prophet again inquired of the Lord and in mid-May, shortly after most of the Eastern Saints had settled in Ohio, received additional information regarding stewardships. While visiting the Saints in Thompson, the Prophet learned that the bishop of the Church was to receive the property of the people and was to divide the "inheritances" among the stewards according to their "circumstances," "wants," and "needs" (see D&C 51:3). Therefore, under this law, everyone was not to have exactly the same thing. "The 'equality' was to vary as much as the man's circumstances, his family, his wants and needs, may vary." fn Or as Brigham Young said, "How could you ever get a people equal with regard to their possessions? They never can be, no more than they can be in the appearance of their faces." fn

 

When Leman Copley left the Order, the Saints were in a difficult situation. After initiating a building program in Thompson, they were ordered by the legal owner of the property to leave. They had sacrificed economically while complying with the commandment to move to Ohio. Some had sold farms at a loss, and all had spent part of their money during the move westward. Undoubtedly, they lacked the necessary funds to buy suitable property in Ohio, and members did not own sufficient land in Kirtland to accommodate the needs of all these converts. fn After seeking advice from the Prophet, they were instructed to move to western Missouri (see D&C 54:8, 9). Consequently, during the summer of 1831 most of the New York Saints settled in the American frontier, where they sought to live in harmony with the law of consecration. fn

 

The New York Saints were not the only members to move West. Most of the converts, including those who are known to have been members of "the Family" and had been living in Kirtland in the fall of 1830, also migrated to Jackson County, Missouri. Morley sold his farm in Kirtland and received an inheritance in the West. Some of the Saints, including Bishop Edward Partridge, Titus Billings, and A. Sidney Gilbert (Newel K. Whitney's business partner), emigrated in harmony with revelations received by the Prophet. Members in Kirtland were instructed by revelation to assist financially in the building of the land of Zion (see D&C 63:40; 64:26). Meanwhile, developments in and near Kirtland had brought on questions that prompted the Prophet to seek counsel from the Lord. Therefore, all major revelations relating to the law of consecration or the United Order were unfolded in northeastern Ohio.

 

Gathering at Kirtland

 

But Kirtland was not abandoned. After returning from Missouri in late August 1831, Joseph Smith received several revelations regarding Kirtland's future (see D&C 63 and 64). Joseph learned from the Lord that the Frederick G. Williams farm (consisting of approximately 150 acres) was not to be sold and that Newel K. Whitney and Sidney Gilbert were not to dispose of their store or possessions, that a "strong hold" might be retained in Kirtland "for the space of five years" (see D&C 64:21, 26). Frederick G. Williams, Newel K. Whitney, most members of the Smith family, and a few other Saints continued to reside in that township. Although Joseph Smith, Sidney Rigdon, and their families moved to Hiram, Ohio, in mid-September 1831, they left that community in the spring of 1832. Fleeing from their oppressors, Joseph, Sidney, and their families relocated in Kirtland by September 1832. For the second time, Kirtland became the home of the Prophet; furthermore, while most emigrating Latter-day Saints were moving to Missouri, Kirtland became a second gathering place and headquarters of the Church. Joseph continued to reside in Kirtland until January 1838. Then in the midst of apostate mobocracy, the Prophet sought refuge in Far West, Missouri.

 

Meanwhile, Kirtland did not become a major gathering place for the Saints until members began building a temple in the summer of 1833. After selling their farms, immigrants from the East brought money to Kirtland, but instead of buying farms and building homes that compared with their former residences, many sacrificed and contributed generously to building a House for the Lord. fn

 

Failure of United Order in Missouri

 

Developments in Missouri helped to bring about a quick demise of the United Order there. Lack of a correct understanding of this law, lack of money and land, selfishness, covetous desires, persecution, and expulsion from Jackson County all contributed to the failure of the Saints in Missouri to live this higher law (D&C 101:6-8; 103:4; 105:2-6). fn To be more specific, after the Saints in Thompson had been frustrated in their attempt to comply with the provisions of this law, a second attempt to institute the United Order was made in Jackson County, Missouri. Within six months of the initial settlement of that community (by the end of 1831), Bishop Edward Partridge had established a storehouse for the reception and distribution of consecrated goods, and one year after the gathering had commenced most of the three to four hundred converts living there had consecrated their property to the bishop and were living on inheritances. But the implementation of this law was again impeded by problems. Some members did not comply or did not learn of the recommendations of leaders in Kirtland, who instructed others not to gather unless they took with them money, seeds, cattle or other contributions to the system. Evidently, there was not sufficient property to give every Latter-day Saint family an adequate inheritance. A number of families crowded in homes that were meant to support a single family. Apparently, some became lazy while they were waiting for an inheritance or the anticipated Second Coming. Others left the Church, taking with them their inheritances. As early as the fall of 1832, Bishop Edward Partridge began leasing land (rather than conveying deeds) to the Saints. Under the provision of these contracts, stewards were not permitted to transfer their inheritances to their wives, children, or heirs, or to sell their property. fn

 

On several occasions, the Prophet wrote to Church leaders in Missouri informing them that their adaptation of the law of consecration was not correct. In a letter to William W. Phelps, dated 27 November 1832, Joseph Smith stated that he was displeased because the Saints who had gathered in Zion had not received "their inheritance by consecrations, by order of deed from the Bishop." fn The Prophet eventually resolved this problem and in harmony with divine guidance edited section 51 (in the current edition of the Doctrine and Covenants) by adding the following instructions to this revelation: a transgressor who left the Church was to retain that which had been deeded to him but had no claim on the surplus that he contributed to the Church (see D&C 51:5). fn

 

Commenting on Bishop Partridge's modification of the United Order in Missouri, President J. Reuben Clark, Jr., former member of the First Presidency, said that the "lease-lend" principle was not in accordance with the revelations which Joseph Smith received regarding the United Order. Basic to this principle, he added, was the private ownership of property. "Every man owned his portion, or inheritance, or stewardship, with an absolute title." This inheritance was to be used for the support of himself and his family. "There is nothing in the revelations that would indicate that this property was not freely alienable at the will of the owner. [And] it was not contemplated that the Church should own everything." Moreover, "life under the United Order was not a communal life, as the Prophet Joseph, himself, said (HC 3:28). The United Order is an individualistic system, not a communal [nor communistic] system." fn

 

After experiencing frustrations and failures for almost a decade, in 1838 members throughout the Church were given a less comprehensive law, the law of tithing (see D&C 119).

 

The United Order in Kirtland

 

Meanwhile, some members in Kirtland were striving to live the law of consecration or the United Order, although the practice was not precisely the same as the basic principles that were revealed. During the brief period the United Order was practiced in Missouri, Kirtland, and Utah, there were no practices that were identical. It is one thing to receive a revelation and another to implement it. Since the Lord has stated that we must be united under the principles of consecration and stewardship or we cannot inherit the Celestial Kingdom, one day we must live these principles (D&C 88:22; 105:5).

 

All attempts to live the principles outlined by the Lord to unite the Saints and provide for the poor are simply examples of learning to live the gospel, line upon line and precept upon precept. Welfare Services today, for example, is another effort to live these principles outlined by the Lord.

 

Thus . . . in many of its great essentials, we have [in] the welfare plan . . . the broad essentials of the United Order. (J. Reuben Clark,] Conference Report, October 1942, pp. 57-58) . . .

 

It is thus apparent that when the principles of tithing and the fast are properly observed and the welfare plan gets fully developed and wholly into operation, we shall not be so very far from carrying out the great fundamentals of the United Order. The only limitation on you and me is within ourselves. fn

 

It is not clear when early Latter-day Saints began to live the United Order (or as it is called in other documents, the "United Firm"). In a revelation (4 December 1831) making known the duties of Newel K. Whitney, second bishop of the Church, the Lord declared that while the Saints in Missouri were to operate the United Order under the direction of Bishop Edward Partridge, the Order in Kirtland was to be under the direction of Bishop Whitney (D&C 72:5). Not only were members to give an accounting of their stewardship to him, but he was to keep the Lord's storehouse, receive Church funds, take account of the elders, and administer to the wants of the elders and the poor through the consecration of the Saints (D&C 72:9-12). He was, however, to operate under the direction of Bishop Partridge in Missouri (vv. 13-18).

 

Section 78

 

By March 1832 the United Order was organized not only in Missouri but in Kirtland as well (D&C 78:3-8). Bishop Newel K. Whitney, in conjunction with Joseph Smith and Sidney Rigdon, sat in council with the Saints in Missouri (v. 9). In their organization of the United Order they were to organize by a "bond or everlasting covenant that cannot be broken." If any were to break this bond, they would lose their office and standing in the Church (w. 11-12). It was through the United Order, despite the tribulation that would come upon them, that they would be able to stand independent of "all other creatures beneath the celestial world" and ultimately obtain exaltation, inheriting all things (w. 13-22).

 

According to the minutes of the United Order for 30 April 1832, two agents were appointed for the Order, A. Sidney Gilbert in Missouri and Newel K. Whitney in Kirtland. It was the duty of the United Firm, by their branches at Jackson County, Missouri, and Geauga County, Ohio, to regulate their business by these two agents. fn On the same day another part of the Order met, the Literary Firm. This firm was responsible for printing various writings, e.g., the revelations, the new translation of the Bible, the Church hymn book, and other Church publications. fn

 

These early days in the Order must have been days of inquiry and searching for the best way to implement the program among the Saints. In a letter from the Prophet Joseph Smith to Oliver Cowdery, in response to inquiries regarding the procedures to be followed in the United Order, the Prophet gave this advice: "I have nothing further to say on the subject than to recommend that you make yourself acquainted with the commandments of the Lord, and the laws of the state, and govern yourselves accordingly." fn

 

The original members of the United Order were ten leaders of the Church. fn Under the direction of the Lord the group was increased by two members. On 15 March 1833 Frederick G. Williams was added to the group (D&C 92:1-2). Two months earlier it had been decided to pay him $300 annually for his services as assistant scribe for the Order.24 On 4 June 1833 John Johnson, Sr. was selected to be a member of the Order (D&C 96:6-9).

 

The United Order continued to purchase land and operate the Newel K. Whitney Store in Kirtland and the A. Sidney Gilbert Store in Missouri, until 10 April 1834. At that time the United Order was dissolved and each individual received his own stewardships. fn

 

Section 104

 

Thirteen days later the Lord gave specific direction on the division of stewardships. It must be remembered that some very dramatic events had made this move necessary. The Saints in Jackson County, Missouri, had been driven from their inheritances and therefore it was impossible to continue functioning as a united group. It is also obvious that the Lord never intended that the Saints participate in a communal order; while the Prophet was requesting information on what action should be taken, he received a reaffirmation of how to implement the Lord's economic order.

 

In this revelation the Lord reminded the Saints that it was he who commanded the United Order to be organized as an everlasting order until he returns (D&C 104:1). Those who had been obedient to the Order had obtained great blessings, while those who had transgressed their covenants were cursed (vv. 5-10).

 

The Lord again clarified the correct procedure in implementing the United Order. Individual stewardships were allocated to the various members of the Order and each would be responsible for giving an accounting of this stewardship to the Lord (vv. 11-13). First, Sidney Rigdon received his place of residence and the tannery (v. 20).

 

Second, Martin Harris received a lot from John Johnson and was to devote his money for the purpose of proclaiming "my words" (vv. 24, 26).

 

Third, Frederick G. Williams was given as a stewardship the place where he lived (v. 27).

 

Fourth, Oliver Cowdery received Lot One of the Kirtland Plat and also his father's lot (v. 28). Jointly Oliver and President Williams received the printing office. This was the beginning of the stewardship appointed unto them and their descendants (vv. 29-31).

 

Fifth, John Johnson had allocated to him his residence and the one hundred plus acre French Farm which had been purchased on 10 April 1833, except the temple lot and the lots assigned to Oliver Cowdery (v. 34). Lots were to be rayed out and sold "for the building up of the city of my saints" as it would be made known to Brother Johnson by the voice of the Spirit and by the voice of the Order (v. 36).

 

Sixth, Newel K. Whitney received the houses and lots where he resided, the store, the lot directly south of the store, and the ashery (v. 39). Bishop Whitney was to continue to play a major roll in "my order which I have established for my stake in the land of Kirtland" (v. 40, italics added). In addition to the property and the building, the entire mercantile establishment was his stewardship, along with his agent (v. 41). The identity of this agent is not clear, although it could have been Orson Hyde; he worked for Bishop Whitney and later had the store deeded to him for a short period of time. fn

 

Seventh, Joseph Smith, Jr. received as a stewardship the temple lot and the inheritance where his father resided. The Joseph Smith, Sr. stewardship was to be reckoned with the Prophet's (vv. 43, 45).

 

As a part of the individual stewardships, the United Order between Missouri and Kirtland, as we have seen, was dissolved and they were to become two separate orders: "the United Order of the Stake of Zion, the City of Kirtland" and "the United Order of the City of Zion" (vv. 47-48). This allowed them to be organized "in their own name, and in their own names." In other words, they were to have their individual stewardships. This action was necessary since the Saints in Missouri had been driven out (v. 49, 51). The Order in Kirtland and the Order in Missouri were not to be bound together except by loan, as agreed between them (v. 53).

 

This reorganization by the Lord really was implementing the principles already given by the Lord, for as he had said in this revelation, the properties were his and the Saints were his stewards (vv. 55-56).

 

One purpose for the organization of the Order was to print Joseph Smith's translation of the Bible and the Doctrine and Covenants. This would help prepare the Saints for the time when Christ would come and dwell among his people (v. 59). In addition, they were to prepare two treasuries and appoint a treasurer over each. The first was the "sacred treasury of the Lord." The funds in this treasury were for the purpose of printing the scriptures and other Church works. The profits acquired from this treasury were only to be used by consent of the Order and the Lord (vv. 60-66).

 

The other treasury was for the purpose of receiving all the improvements resulting from their individual stewardships. These could be of many types: houses, lands, cattle, money, everything except the "sacred writings" (v. 68). Once these items were placed in the treasury they no longer were a part of an individual's stewardship but belonged to the Order; none could be removed without the approval of those in the Order (vv. 70-71). If an individual in the United Order needed anything in this "other treasury" to assist him in his stewardship, with the approval and the common consent of the Order, the treasurer could give him what was required. He was forbidden to withhold anything approved by the common consent of the Order (vv. 72-75).

 

When this reorganization of the United Order in Kirtland came to an end is difficult to determine. However, the word of the Lord in D&C 105:34 removed from the Saints in Missouri the responsibility of living the law of consecration and stewardship of property until after the redemption of Zion.

 

By 1837 the United Order in Kirtland had definitely come to an end when a financial crisis struck. This economic plight was one of many factors that led to an apostasy in the Church, and forced Joseph to flee from Kirtland to save his life. In January 1838, seven years after he had initially settled in that community and five years after he had returned from his short stay in Hiram, the Prophet left Kirtland for the last time. Meanwhile, through the application of the principle of stewardship, which includes manifestations of love and sacrifice, Latter-day Saints made Kirtland into a stronghold for exactly five years. During this remarkable period, this religious community experienced an unusual outpouring of the blessing of God. Many Kirtland Saints experienced a memorable spiritual feast that was in the words of Oliver Cowdery too "[glorious] to be described. I only say," he added, "the heavens were opened to many, and great and marvelous things" were unfolded to Latter-day Saints. fn

 

Efforts to live the principles of the United Order were attempted later in Utah. Like the various attempts in Kirtland and Missouri, there were different orders. Eventually they also failed. fn Today we are living many of these same principles revealed by the Lord as we participate in welfare services and other programs of the Church. As explained by President Marion G. Romney, "We as Latter-day Saints should live strictly by the principles of the United Order insofar as they are embodied in present Church practices, such as fast offering, tithing, and welfare activities. Through these practices we could as individuals, if we were of a mind to, implement in our own lives all the basic principles of the United Order." fn

 

Notes United Under the Laws of the Celestial Kingdom

 

1. "These principles of union, which the Latter-day Saints in former times ignored, and in consequence of disobedience of them were driven from Missouri, are called by different names—united order, order of Enoch, the principles of union of the celestial law, etc. When we search the revelations of God in regard to them, we see that wherever the gospel of the Son of God has been revealed in its fullness, the principles of the united order were made manifest, and required to be observed" (Lorenzo Snow, JD 19:342). Although today many use the term "law of consecration and stewardship" to describe certain principles that are designed to bring about unity, support Church programs, and care for the poor, and United Order to describe the implementation of these principles, the scriptures and most Church leaders have used "United Order" to describe both.

 

2. John Whitmer, An Early Latter Day Saint History: The Book of John Whitmer Kept by Commandment, ed. F. Mark McKiernan and Roger D. Launius (Independence, Mo.: Herald Publishing House, 1980), p. 37.

 

3. HC 1:148; Whitmer, Book of John Whitmer, p. 38.

 

4. Whitmer, Book of John Whitmer, p. 42.

 

5. Milton V. Backman, Jr., The Heavens Resound: A History of the Latter-day Saints in Ohio 1838-1838 (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1983), p. 319. Clarence H. Danhoff, Change in Agriculture: The Northern United States, 1820-1870 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1969), p. 114; Lee Soltow, "Inequality Amidst Abundance: Land Ownership in Early Nineteenth Century Ohio," Ohio History 82 (Spring 1979); Percy W. Bidwell and John I. Falconer, History of Agriculture in the Northern United States, 1620-1860 (Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Institution, 1925), pp. 37, 115.

 

6. The Levi Hancock Journal, n.p., n.d., p. 28.

 

7. Whitmer, Book of John Whitmer, p. 54.

 

8. Ibid., p. 74.

 

9. J. Reuben Clark, Jr., Conference Report, October 1942, pp. 54-59.

 

10. Cited by Albert E. Bowen, The Church Welfare Plan (Salt Lake City: Deseret Sunday School Union, 1946), p. 25.

 

11. HC 1:180; Newel K. Knight, Scraps of Biography: The Tenth Book of the Faith-Promoting Series (Salt Lake City: Juvenile Instructor, 1883), chapter 6.

 

12. For a more complete discussion of the Leman Copley problem and the Thompson Saints, see Keith W. Perkins, "The Ministry of the Shakers," found herein.

 

13. Backman, Heavens Resound, p. 16.

 

14. For a discussion of the application of the United Order in Missouri during the 1830s, see Leonard J. Arrington, Feramorz Y. Fox, and Dean L. May, Building the City of God: Community and Cooperation Among the Mormons (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1976), p. 22.

 

15. Joseph Smith to William W. Phelps, 27 November 1832, cited in HC 1:297-99.

 

16. Robert J. Woodford, "The Historical Development of the Doctrine and Covenants," unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Brigham Young University, 1974. Compare Book of Commandments, chapter 44 w. 229 with Doctrine and Covenants (1835), chapter 17 vv. 8-10.

 

17. Woodford, "Historical Development," p. 672.

 

18. J. Reuben Clark, Jr., Conference Report, October 1942, p. 57.

 

19. Marion G. Romney, Look to God and Live, comp. George J. Romney (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1973), pp. 227-28.

 

20. Donald Q. Cannon and Lyndon W. Cook, ea., Far West Record (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1983), pp. 47-8.

 

21. Ibid., p. 46.

 

22. HC 1:341.

 

23. The original members of the United Order were Joseph Smith, Sidney Rigdon, and Jesse Gause of the First Presidency; Bishops Edward Partridge and Newel K. Whitney; Oliver Cowdery and William W. Phelps, printers of the Church; A. Sidney Gilbert, agent in Zion; John Whitmer, the Lord's clerk; and Martin Harrris, one of the three witnesses (see D&C 70:1-5; 82:11-12; 104:19-46; Far West Record, p. 47).

 

24. Kirtland Council Minute Book, located in Historical Department of the Church, 9 January 1833.

 

25. Dean C. Jessee, comp. and ea., The Personal Writings of Joseph Smith (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1984), p. 32.

 

26. Geauga County, Ohio Land Records, 1835 and 1839.

 

27. Oliver Cowdery, Sketch Book 21 January 1836, Archives of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Salt Lake City, Utah.

 

28. Leonard J. Arrington, Great Basin Kingdom: An Economic History of the Latter-day Saints 1830-1900 (Lincoln, Neb.: University of Nebraska Press, 1970), pp. 323-27.

 

29. Look to God and Live, p. 227.

 

 

(Robert L. Millet and Kent P. Jackson, eds., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 1: The Doctrine and Covenants [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1989], 170.)

 

 

There is no other penalty, for the contract is between the individual and his Heavenly Father alone. As Heber C. Kimball reminded the saints, there are no covenants made between individuals in the church. All promises and agreements are between the individual and our Father in Heaven; all other parties, including the angels, are present only as witnesses. Therefore whether anybody else observes and keeps the promise is not my concern, but if I do not do what I have promised, what blessings can I expect?

 

Another disturbing thing is that I cannot put off fulfilling my part of the agreement. "The time has come, and is now at hand; and behold, and lo, it must needs be that there be an organization of my people, in regulating and establishing the affairs of the storehouse for the poor of my people . . . in the land of Zion [or in other words, the city of Enoch]—for a permanent and everlasting establishment and order unto my church" (D&C 78:3D&C 78:3-4). It must begin now and from here on must continue. This is essential, we are told, if the church is to fulfill its purpose: "To advance the cause, which ye have espoused, to the salvation of man, and to the glory of the Father who is in heaven" (D&C 78:4). This is the way he wants it; the law of consecration is inseparable from the law of God, the law of obedience, and the law of sacrifice which the saints have already accepted.

 

Can it for any reason be postponed? No! Those who have failed to keep it here and now are denounced: "Inasmuch as some of my servants have not kept the commandment, but have broken the covenant . . . I have cursed them with a very sore and grievous curse" (D&C 104:4). Why on earth would anyone want to disregard it after accepting the gospel and bidding farewell to the ways of the world? The answer: "by covetousness and feigned words" (D&C 104:52)—unable to give up their habits of greed, they pretended to accept what they did not accept. Of course, they argued that the thing wasn't practical or convenient just then. When will it be? Thirty years after the above revelation, Brigham Young, along with John Taylor, Wilford Woodruff, and Lorenzo Snow, were still vigorously appealing to the saints to wake up:

 

Some of our Elders, and, in fact, some of the Twelve will tell you, "yes, yes, the Order is a splendid principle and will bring happiness, etc., but it is not hardly time to enter into it, wait a little while until the people understand it a little better." Why, they are fools! They don't know what they talk about. They have ears to hear and will not hearken, and have eyes to see and will not understand. . . . When our conduct hedges up the way of angels how can they bless us? . . . How can they help us work out our salvation? When Joseph Smith was alive I can say that I never heard him lay one plan out for the people but would have been a success if it had been carried out as he directed. And I have seen the same thing in myself. I don't care how the world goes, what the President [of the U.S.] or his emissaries do. It matters nothing to me. What I am thinking of and interested about is how do the Latter-day Saints do? The devil is in the community and he has not been turned out. . . . Well, I still have hope in Israel. fn

 

So spoke Brigham Young at St. George on June 1, 1876, commenting on the purposes of the temple there.

 

 

(Hugh Nibley, Approaching Zion, edited by Don E. Norton [Salt Lake City and Provo: Deseret Book Co., Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies, 1989], 384 - 385.)

 

 

Law of Consecration and Stewardship (Today)

 

Tithing, Fast offerings, welfare, PEF, Missionary, Temple building etc. . . .

 

Temple covenants:  The Law of Sacrifice, the Law of Worship, and the Law of Consecration.

 

The Law of Worship and the Law of Sacrifice

Bruce Satterfield
Department of Religious Education
Brigham Young University - Idaho

[Found in New Perspectives, Fall Semester Vol. 14, No. 2, November 1997, pp. 14-16.]

In holy temples, we enter into covenants with God that are essential for our progress towards exaltation. One such covenant centers on the law of sacrifice.(1) It is important to understand the intent of the law of sacrifice in order to honor the covenant associated with it. A study of the scriptures will greatly aid our coming to understand the spirit of the law of sacrifice while at the same time increasing our motivation and determination to live the law.

According to the scriptural account, after Adam and Eve were cast out of the garden of Eden, they "called upon the name of the Lord." What they prayed for is not stated. But it must be certain that at least one of the things they wanted to know was how to do to regain God's presence for as the account reads, "they were shut out from his presence" (Moses 5:4). In response to their prayers, the Lord said "that they should worship the Lord their God, and should offer the firstlings of their flocks, for an offering unto the Lord" (Moses 5:5).

The law of worship has been given to man in every age. In our dispensation, the Lord told the Church, "all men must repent and believe on the name of Jesus Christ, and worship the Father in his name. . . . or they cannot be saved in the Kingdom of God" (D&C 20:29). Dallin H. Oaks described true worship in these terms: "Worship often includes actions, but true worship always involves a particular attitude of mind. The attitude of worship evokes the deepest feelings of allegiance, adoration, and awe. Worship combines love and reverence in a state of devotion that draws our spirits closer to God."(2) The attitude of true worship of God means to emulate God by placing him at the very center of our lives. When God is placed at the center of our lives then his work and glory, which is to "bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of man" (Moses 1:39), becomes our work and glory. In this condition all our actions are ultimately aimed at bringing to pass the immortality and eternal life of God's children.

The law of worship and the law of sacrifice are inherently connected. The ritual associated with the law of sacrifice is a visual representation of the law of worship. We are not told specifically how Adam performed the ritual of the law of sacrifice. We do know, however, that the law of sacrifice was passed on to Adam's posterity. It continued to the time of Moses and was incorporated in the law of Moses. In Leviticus chapter one, a detailed description of the ritual associated with the law of sacrifice is given. This description is very revealing. Since the "law of sacrifice is required of all disciples,"(3) the description of the sacrificial procedure will help in understanding what is meant by the law of sacrifice and the law of worship.

According to Leviticus 1, the offering was first killed (vs. 5). After it was killed, the animal was flayed, or skinned (vs. 6). The skin was not to be burnt for that would produce an offensive smell; the sacrifice was to be a "sweet savour unto the Lord" (vs. 9), meaning that this sacrifice was acceptable to God. The animal was then cut into pieces and laid in a specified order on the altar (vss. 6-9). First, the head was removed and placed on the altar. Second, the fat was cut off and laid next to the head. Then the inwards were taken out and laid next to the fat. After that, the legs were cut off the carcass and laid next to the inwards. Finally, the carcass was placed on the altar. After all this was done, the entire animal was consumed in flames. It seems that the sacrificial offerings performed at the time of Adam were similar to the procedure described in Leviticus 1 for we are told that Abel "brought of the firstlings of his flock, and the fat thereof" (Genesis 4:4;Moses 5:20; emphasis added).

The Hebrew name of the burnt offering is olah ("that which goes up"), meaning the offering that goes up or is given up to God. The translation of olah in the King James Version is the "burnt offering" because the entire animal was consumed in the flames of the fire, and, unlike other sacrifices, no part was eaten by the offerer or priest. The symbolism of this is clear: the burnt offering was a consecration offering. In other words, the entire offering was consecrated to God. It can be seen from this that the law of sacrifice is not only inherently connected with the law of worship but also with another covenant made in the temple, the law of consecration. Of this, Elder Bruce R. McConkie taught: "Sacrifice and consecration are inseparably intertwined"(4)

But what was being sacrificed or consecrated to God? The answer was given to Adam and Eve. After "many days" of performing the ritual associated with the law of sacrifice, "an angel of the Lord appeared unto Adam, saying: Why dost thou offer sacrifices unto the Lord?" Adam responded by saying, "I know not, save the Lord commanded me." Then the angel explained the meaning of the sacrifice in these words: "This thing is a similitude of the sacrifice of the Only Begotten of the Father" (Moses 5:6-7). That is, the lamb symbolized the sacrifice of Jesus Christ in behalf of Adam and Eve and their posterity.

The cutting of the lamb into pieces and placing the pieces on the altar to be entirely consumed by the flames was a representation of the worship, sacrifice, and consecration of Jesus Christ to God's work and glory. His worship and sacrifice was evidenced by his consecrating all he had to the building of the Kingdom of God. Each piece of the sacrificial lamb symbolized specific aspects of Christ's consecration to the salvation of man through the atonement. The severed head symbolized that the Savior would devote all his thoughts, intellect, and study to the salvation of man. Likewise, the fat represented that all the Savior's energy would be consecrated to the atoning work. The inwards, typifying the Savior's emotions, best exemplified by his love, mercy, and compassion, would be aimed at saving mankind from a world of darkness and doom while leading them into the path that leads to exaltation. The legs symbolized that the direction and course of the Savior's life would be dedicated to one end alone: to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of God's children. In other words, the sacrifice, flaying, and burning of the sacrificial lamb symbolized that Christ would sacrifice and devote all his heart, might, mind, and strength to God's work and glory. This is the ultimate form of worship!

Just as Jesus Christ would sacrifice and consecrate all he had to God's work and glory so must Adam and Eve (and their posterity) sacrifice all they have for the same purpose.(5) Therefore, the angel told Adam and Eve that from that day forward, everything they did was to be done "in the name of the Son" (Moses 5:7-8). Paul stated it this way: "present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service" (Romans 12:1). It is in this way that many in the past "who had been faithful in the testimony of Jesus while they lived in mortality" had "offered sacrifice in the similitude of the great sacrifice of the Son of God" (D&C 138:12-13).

The scriptures also reveal many other insights relative to the law of sacrifice that are helpful. For instance, as already noted, the ritual associated with the law of sacrifice became an important part of the law of Moses. In fact, the burnt offering was to be offered "day by day" in both the morning and the evening (Numbers 28:3-4). This was to continually remind Israel that not only were they dependent upon the future sacrifice of the Messiah for their salvation but that all their activities, every day, all day, should be devoted to God.

The Old Testament is clear that performing the ritual of sacrifice was not as important as the intent of the rite. When Saul was commanded by the prophet Samuel to lead the Israelites in battle against their age old enemy, the Amalekites, he was told to "utterly destroy all that they [the Amalekites] have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass" (1 Samuel 15:3). However, Saul was disobedient to the command of the Lord through Samuel. After defeating the Amalekites, and killing all the people, he spared "the best of the sheep, and of the oxen, and of the fatlings, and the lambs" that he might offer "sacrifice unto the Lord" (1 Samuel 15:9-21). Saul's disobedience violated the very intent of the law of sacrifice. Therefore, Samuel rebuked Saul saying, "Hath the LORD as great delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices, as in obeying the voice of the LORD? Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken than the fat of rams" (1 Samuel 15:22). Likewise, a later prophet chided Israel for ritualistic living of the law of sacrifice without considering its intent: "For I desired mercy, and not sacrifice; and the knowledge of God more than burnt offerings" (Hosea 6:6).

The relationship between the intent of the law of sacrifice and the ritual is well illustrated in the story of Lehi. When Lehi was commanded to leave Jerusalem "and depart into the wilderness," we are told that he "he left his house, and the land of his inheritance, and his gold, and his silver, and his precious things, and took nothing with him, save it were his family, and provisions, and tents, and departed into the wilderness" (1 Nephi 2:4). Some days later, when he and his family stopped their journey and pitched their tents near a river, Lehi "built an altar of stones, and made an offering unto the Lord, and gave thanks unto the Lord our God" (1 Nephi 2:7). The relationship is clear. After sacrificing all his worldly possessions, Lehi offered a sacrifice to demonstrate his willingness to worship God with all his heart, might, mind, and strength by placing him at the center of his life and actions.

Note the similarity in the life of Abraham. After the Lord had told him to "Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father's house, unto a land that I will shew thee," Abraham obediently left his land and people and came into the land of Canaan, the promised land. Upon his arrival, he built an altar and offered sacrifice (Gen. 12:7).

In fact, the whole life of Abraham is a paradigm of how the law of sacrifice should be lived. At various times, he was asked to give up mortal things for higher ideals. In all cases, Abraham was obedient to the law of sacrifice (see Genesis 12-22) and therefore, he achieved his exaltation (see D&C 132:29-37). Abraham epitomizes what Joseph Smith said about the law of sacrifice. He explained that the law of sacrifice requires a "man to lay down his all, his character and reputation, his honor, and applause, his good name among men, his houses, his lands, his brothers and sisters, his wife and children, and even his own life -- counting all things but filth and dross for the excellency of the knowledge of Jesus Christ."(6)

The example of Abraham and Lehi is found in other places in the scriptures. For instance, the law of sacrifice permeates the entire gospel of Matthew. Note the following examples. Upon seeing the star that signaled the birth of the Messiah, the wise men demonstrated their willingness to make a sacrifice for a higher cause by leaving their homeland and making an extended journey to find the Christ child and pay homage to him. The giving of their treasure, which included the expensive gifts of "gold, and frankincense, and myrrh," was a further demonstration of their willingness to sacrifice what they had to the child who would bring salvation to all men (see Matt. 2:1-12). In stark contrast, Herod, the king of the Savior's own people, was not willing to sacrifice anything to worship the Savior but instead attempted to assassinate his would be rival (Matt. 2:1-18). Matthew also records the sacrifice made by some of the Savior's disciples. When Peter, Andrew, James, and John were asked to follow the Savior, "they straightway left their nets [occupation], and followed him." Interestingly enough, the account reveals that James and John not only left their nets, but their father also (Matt. 4:18-22). Speaking of this kind of sacrifice, Matthew records the Savior saying, "He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me" (Matthew 10:37). Again, on another occasion, the Savior said: "And every one that hath forsaken houses, or brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, or wife, or children, or lands, for my name's sake, shall receive an hundredfold, and shall inherit everlasting life" (Matt. 19:29). Matthew also records that the ultimate sacrifice made by any man was made by the Savior himself when he retired to Gethsemane to begin the atoning sacrifice. That this was truly a sacrifice is revealed in the Savior's own words, "O my Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me: nevertheless not as I will, but as thou wilt" (Matt. 26:39). Submitting our will to the will of the Father is the essence of the law of sacrifice.

The scriptures inform us that with the sacrifice of Jesus Christ the ritual associated with the law of sacrifice, the killing of an animal, was done away with. After the great destruction had come upon the land associated with the death of Christ, the Lord said to the people: "ye shall offer up unto me no more the shedding of blood; yea, your sacrifices and your burnt offerings shall be done away, for I will accept none of your sacrifices and your burnt offerings." Instead of offering blood sacrifices, the Lord required a new sacrifice: "And ye shall offer for a sacrifice unto me a broken heart and a contrite spirit" (3 Nephi 9:19-20). In the Doctrine and Covenants, the latter-day Church was given the same commandment: "Thou shalt offer a sacrifice unto the Lord thy God in righteousness, even that of a broken heart and a contrite spirit" (D&C 59:8).

For one to offer a sacrifice of a broken heart and a contrite spirit, he must recognize his spiritual poorness, mourn his sins, and come unto Christ for forgiveness. When that happens, the sacrifice of Christ will come into his heart and comfort him through the miracle of forgiveness (see 3 Nephi 12:3-4). Elder Neal A. Maxwell spoke of this in these terms:

"So it is that real, personal sacrifice never was placing an animal on the altar. Instead, it is a willingness to put the animal in us upon the altar and letting it be consumed! Such is the "sacrifice unto the Lord . . . of a broken heart and a contrite spirit," (D&C 59:8), a prerequisite to taking up the cross, while giving "away all [our] sins" in order to know God (Alma 22:18); for the denial of self precedes the full acceptance of Him."(7)

But this is only the beginning of honoring the intent of the law of sacrifice. President Spencer W. Kimball taught :

" . . .we must lay on the altar and sacrifice whatever is required by the Lord. We begin by offering a "broken heart and a contrite spirit." We follow this by giving our best effort in our assigned fields of labor and callings. We learn our duty and execute it fully. Finally we consecrate our time, talents and means as called upon by our file leaders and as prompted by the whisperings of the Spirit. In the Church, as in the Welfare system also, we can give expression to every ability, every righteous desire, every thoughtful impulse. Whether a volunteer, father, home teacher, bishop, or neighbor, whether a visiting teacher, mother, homemaker, or friend--there is ample opportunity to give our all."(8)

In conclusion, the law of worship and the law of sacrifice are interrelated laws that are designed to put God at the center of our lives. Those who enter into these laws by covenant, place all they have on the altar. Their minds, energy, heart, and course of life will be devoted to God's work and glory which is to bring to pass "the immortality and eternal life of man." In other words, they will "love and serve God with all their mights, minds, and strength" (D&C 20:31). In so doing, they will lose their life in the service of others. By losing their life in the building of the kingdom of God, they shall find it saved in the celestial kingdom (see Matt. 10:39). President Harold B. Lee taught:

"If in this day the Church rises to the call of the First Presidency, and if Church members sacrifice of their means, their time, their talents for the upbuilding of the kingdom of God, not withholding their own lives, if that were necessary, then there will come to this people, and to that individual who thus is willing to consecrate himself, the greatest joy that can come to the human soul."(9)
 

References

1. President Harold B. Lee taught, "We have in sacred places what we call the law of sacrifice" (The Teachings of Harold B. Lee, Ed. Clyde J. Williams, [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1996] p.318). Likewise, President Ezra Taft Benson stated, "In the course of our visits to the temple, we are given insights into the meaning of the eternal journey of man. We see beautiful and impressive symbolisms of the most important events -- past, present, and future -- symbolizing man's mission in relationship to God. We are reminded of our obligations as we make solemn covenants pertaining to obedience, consecration, sacrifice, and dedicated service to our Heavenly Father" (Ezra Taft Benson, Teachings of Ezra Taft Benson, [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1988] p. 251).

2. Dallin H. Oaks, Pure in Heart, Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1988. p.125.

3. Bruce R. McConkie, The Mortal Messiah. The Messiah Series, vols. 2-5. Salt Lake City: Deseret, 1979-1982. 3:240.

4. Conference Report, Apr. 1975, p. 74; or Ensign, May 1975, p. 50.

5. Elder McConkie taught,

"The law of consecration is that we consecrate our time, our talents, and our money and property to the cause of the Church: such are to be available to the extent they are needed to further the Lord's interests on earth.

"The law of sacrifice is that we are willing to sacrifice all that we have for the truth's sake--our character and reputation; our honor and applause; our good name among men; our houses, lands, and families: all things, even our very lives if need be" (Conference Report, Apr. 1975, p. 74; or Ensign, May 1975, p. 50).

6. Lectures on Faith, 6:5.

7. Conference Report, Apr. 1995, p. 91; or Ensign, May 1995, p. 68.

8. Conference Report, Apr. 1978, pp.123­24; or Ensign, May 1978, p.81.

9. The Teachings of Harold B. Lee, Ed. Clyde J. Williams, [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1996] p.318.

 

Obedience, Consecration, and Sacrifice

Elder Bruce R. McConkie
Of the Council of the Twelve
Conference Report, Apr. 1975, 74; or Ensign, May 1975, 50

I have sought and do now seek the guidance of the Holy Spirit so that I may speak plainly and persuasively about two of the crowning doctrines of the gospel.

We are the Lord's people, his saints, those to whom he has given much and from whom he expects much in return. We know the terms and conditions of the plan of salvation--how Christ died for our sins and what we must do to reap the full blessings of his atoning sacrifice.

We have covenanted in the waters of baptism to love and serve him, to keep his commandments, and to put first in our lives the things of his kingdom. In return he has promised us eternal life in his Father's kingdom. We are thus in a position to receive and obey some of the higher laws which prepare us for that eternal life which we so sincerely seek.

Principles of sacrifice and consecration

Accordingly, I shall now set forth some of the principles of sacrifice and consecration to which the true saints must conform if they are ever to go where God and Christ are and have an inheritance with the faithful saints of ages past.

It is written: "He who is not able to abide the law of a celestial kingdom cannot abide a celestial glory." (D&C 88:22.) The law of sacrifice is a celestial law; so also is the law of consecration. Thus to gain that celestial reward which we so devoutly desire, we must be able to live these two laws.

Sacrifice and consecration are inseparably intertwined. The law of consecration is that we consecrate our time, our talents, and our money and property to the cause of the Church: such are to be available to the extent they are needed to further the Lord's interests on earth.

The law of "sacrifice is that we are willing to sacrifice all that we have for the truth's sake--our character and reputation; our honor and applause; our good name among men; our houses, lands, and families: all things, even our very lives if need be.

Joseph Smith said, "A religion that does not require the sacrifice of all things never has power sufficient to produce the faith necessary [to lead] unto life and salvation." (Lectures on Faith, p. 58.)

We are not always called upon to live the whole law of consecration and give all of our time, talents, and means to the building up of the Lord's earthly kingdom. Few of us are called upon to [CR, 75] sacrifice much of what we possess, and at the moment there is only an occasional martyr in the cause of revealed religion.

But what the scriptural account means is that to gain celestial salvation we must be able to live these laws to the full if we are called upon to do so. Implicit in this is the reality that we must in fact live them to the extent we are called upon so to do.

How, for instance, can we establish our ability to live the full law of consecration if we do not in fact pay an honest tithing? Or how can we prove our willingness to sacrifice all things, if need be, if we do not make the small sacrifices of time and toil, or of money and means, that we are now asked to make?

As a young man, serving at the direction of my bishop, I called upon a rich man and invited him to contribute a thousand dollars to a building fund. He declined. But he did say he wanted to help, and if we would have a ward dinner and charge $5 per plate, he would take two tickets. About ten days later this man died unexpectedly of a heart attack, and I have wondered ever since about the fate of his eternal soul.

Beware of covetousness

Wasn't there someone once who said, "Beware of covetousness: for a man's life consisteth not in the abundance of the things which he possesseth." Didn't this same person then speak this parable: "The ground of a certain rich man brought forth plentifully:

    "And he thought within himself, saying, What shall I do, because I have no room where to bestow my fruits?
    "And he said, This will I do: I will pull down my barns, and build greater; and there will I bestow all my fruits and my goods.
    "And I will say to my soul, Soul, thou hast much goods laid up for many years; take thine ease, eat, drink, and be merry.
    "But God said unto him, Thou fool, this night thy soul shall be required of thee: then whose shall those things be, which thou hast provided?"

And then did He not conclude the matter by saying, "So is he that layeth up treasure for himself, and is not rich toward God." (Luke 12:15­21.)

When the prophet Gad commanded David to build an altar and offer sacrifice on property owned by a certain man, that man offered to provide the land, the oxen, and all things for the sacrifice, without cost. But David said, "Nay; but I will surely buy it of thee at a price: neither will I offer burnt offerings unto the Lord my God of that which doth cost me nothing." (2 Sam. 24:24 [2 Samuel 24:24] .)

When it costs us but little to give, [Ensign, 51] the treasure laid up in heaven is a small one. The widow's mite, given in sacrifice, weighs more heavily in the eternal scales than the bulging granaries of the rich man.

Parable of rich young man

There came to Jesus, on a certain occasion, a rich young man who asked: "What good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life?"

Our Lord's answer was the obvious one, the one given by all the prophets of all the ages. It was: "If thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments."

The next question was: "Which commandments?"

Jesus listed them: "Thou shalt do no murder, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Honour thy father and thy mother: and, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself."

Then came this response and query--for the young man was a good man, a faithful man, one who sought righteousness: "All these things have I kept from my youth up: what lack I yet?"

We might well ask, "Isn't it enough to keep the commandments? What more is expected of us than to be true [CR, 76] and faithful to every trust? Is there more than the law of obedience?"

In the case of our rich young friend there was more. He was expected to live the law of consecration, to sacrifice his earthly possessions, for the answer of Jesus was: "If thou wilt be perfect, go and sell that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come and follow me."

As you know, the young man went away sorrowful, "for he had great possessions." (Matt. 19:16­22 [Matthew 19:16­22] .) And we are left to wonder what intimacies he might have shared with the Son of God, what fellowship he might have enjoyed with the apostles, what revelations and visions he might have received, if he had been able to live the law of a celestial kingdom. As it is he remains nameless; as it might have been, his name could have been had in honorable remembrance among the saints forever.

Much is expected

Now I think it is perfectly clear that the Lord expects far more of us than we sometimes render in response. We are not as other men. We are the saints of God and have the revelations of heaven. Where much is given much is expected. We are to put first in our lives the things of his kingdom.

We are commanded to live in harmony with the Lord's laws, to keep all his commandments, to sacrifice all things if need be for his name's sake, to conform to the terms and conditions of the law of consecration.

We have made covenants so to do--solemn, sacred, holy covenants, pledging ourselves before gods and angels.

We are under covenant to live the law of obedience.

We are under covenant to live the law of sacrifice.

We are under covenant to live the law of consecration.

With this in mind, hear this word from the Lord: "If you will that I give unto you a place in the celestial world, you must prepare yourselves by doing the things which I have commanded you and required of you." (D&C 78:7.)

A privilege to sacrifice

It is our privilege to consecrate our time, talents, and means to build up his kingdom. We are called upon to sacrifice, in one degree or another, for the furtherance of his work. Obedience is essential to salvation; so, also, is service; and so, also, are consecration and sacrifice.

It is our privilege to raise the warning voice to our neighbors and to go on missions and offer the truths of salvation to our Father's other children everywhere. We can respond to calls to serve as bishops, as Relief Society presidents, as home teachers, and in any of hundreds of positions of responsibility in our various church organizations. We can labor on welfare projects, engage in genealogical research, perform vicarious ordinances in the temples.

We can pay an honest tithing and contribute to our fast offering, welfare, budget, building, and missionary funds. We can bequeath portions of our assets and devise portions of our properties to the Church when we pass on to other spheres.

We can consecrate a portion of our time to systematic study, to becoming gospel scholars, to treasuring up the revealed truths which guide us in paths of truth and righteousness.

Evidences of true church

And the fact that faithful members of the Church do all these things is one of the great evidences of the divinity of the work. Where else do the generality of the members of any church pay a full tithing? Where is there a people whose congregations have one and two and three percent of their number out in volunteer, self-supporting missionary work at all times? Where does any people as a whole build temples or [CR, 77] operate welfare projects as we do? And where is there so much unpaid teaching and church administration?

In the true church we neither preach for hire nor divine for money. We follow the pattern of Paul and make the gospel of Christ without charge, lest we abuse or misuse the power the Lord has given us. Freely we have received and freely we give, for salvation is free. All who thirst are invited to come and drink of the waters of life, to buy corn and wine without money and without price.

All our service in God's kingdom is predicated on his eternal law which states: "The laborer in Zion shall labor for Zion, for if they labor for money they shall perish." (2 Ne. 26:31 [2 Nephi 26:31] .)

We know full well that the laborer is worthy of his hire, and that those who devote all their time to the building up of the kingdom must be provided with food, clothing, shelter, and the necessaries of life. We must employ teachers in our schools, architects to design our temples, contractors to build our synagogues, and managers to run our businesses. But those so employed, along with the whole membership of the Church, participate also on a freewill and voluntary basis in otherwise furthering the Lord's work. Bank presidents work on welfare projects. Architects leave their drafting boards to go on missions. Contractors lay down their tools to serve as home teachers or bishops. Lawyers put aside Corpus Juris and the Civil Code to act as guides on Temple Square. Teachers leave the classroom to visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction. Musicians who make their livelihood from their artistry willingly direct church choirs and perform at church gatherings. Artists who paint for a living are pleased to volunteer their services freely.

Lord's work must go forward

But the work of the kingdom must go forward, and the members of the Church are and shall be called upon to bear off its burdens. It is the Lord's work and not man's. He is the one who commands us to preach the gospel in all the world, whatever the cost. It is his voice that decrees the building of temples, whatever the cost. He is the one who tells us to care for the poor among us, whatever the cost, lest their cries come up to his throne as a testimony against those who should have fed the hungry and clothed the naked but who did not.

And may I say also--both by way of doctrine and of testimony--that it is his voice which invites us to consecrate of our time, our talents, and our means to carry on his work. It is his voice that calls for service and sacrifice. This is his work. He is at the helm guiding and directing the destiny of his kingdom.

And every member of his church has this promise: That if he remains true and faithful--obeying, serving, consecrating, sacrificing, as required by the gospel--he shall be repaid in eternity a thousandfold and shall have eternal life. What more can we ask?

In the name of the Lord Jesus Christ. Amen.

 

 

The Plan of Salvation and D&C 88

 

 

 Joseph Smith

All men know that they must die.  And it is important that we should understand the reasons and causes of our exposure to the vicissitudes of life and of death, and the designs and purposes of God in our coming into the world, our suffering here, and our departure hence.  What is the object of our coming into existence, then dying and falling away, to be here no more?  It is but reasonable to suppose that God would reveal something in reference to the matter, and it is a subject we ought to study more than any otherWe ought to study it day and night, for the world is ignorant in reference to their true condition and relation.

 (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p.324; emphasis added)

 


"So much more than a matter of abstract theology, this great plan can focus daily life. Its truths are crucial to how we see ourselves, others, life, the Lord, and even the universe. Or how we view a baby. Or death. Or the praise and honors of the world. This plan constitutes the mother lode of meaning and can cradle us, conceptually, amid any concern."


  Neal A. Maxwell
  "The Great Plan of the Eternal God" (Ensign May 1984, p. 22)

                                             
(Doctrine and Covenants 88:36-39.)

 

36 All kingdoms have a law given;

 

37 And there are many kingdoms; for there is no space in the which there is no kingdom; and there is no kingdom in which there is no space, either a greater or a lesser kingdom.

 

38 And unto every kingdom is given a law; and unto every law there are certain bounds also and conditions.

 

39 All beings who abide not in those conditions are not justified.

 

 

In an 1832 revelation, Joseph Smith learned that law is a pervasive manifestation of God's light and power: "The light which is in all things…is the law by which all things are governed" (D&C 88:12-13). In connection with both spiritual law and natural law, no space or relationship occurs in which law is nonexistent. "There are many kingdoms; for there is no space in the which there is no kingdom; …and unto every kingdom is given a law; and unto every law there are certain bounds also and conditions   “D&C 88:37-38).

 

There are as many laws as there are kingdoms, which reflect greater or lesser light and truth. Some laws are higher, and some are lower. The kingdom of God operates in accordance with higher laws befitting God’s exalted station, while the earth and all mortality and other kingdoms belong to lower spheres and therefore operate under different laws. The degree of glory that a person or thing can abide depends on how high a law he, she, or it is able to abide (D&C 88:22-25).

 

Lower laws are subsumed in higher laws. If people keep the laws of God, they have “no need to break the laws of the land” (D&C 58:21). Similarly, when the Law of Moses was fulfilled by Jesus Christ, it was subsumed in him.

 

Existence is a process of progressively learning to obey higher law. Obeying and conforming to law are understood as a sign of growth, maturity, and understanding, and greater obedience to law produces greater freedom (D&C 98:5) and associated blessings (D&C 130:20-21).

 

At all levels, the principles of agency and accountability are in effect: People may choose which laws to obey or to ignore, but God will hold them accountable and reward them accordingly (D&C 82:4). This is not viewed as a threat; law’s purpose is not to force or punish but to guide and provide structure.

 

In the divine or spiritual sphere, law is not the product of a philosophical or theoretical search for what is right or good. It emanates from deity and is revealed through Jesus Christ and his prophets.

 

Spiritual laws given by God to mankind are commonly called commandments, which consist variously of prohibitions (“thou shalt not”), requirements (“thou shalt”), and prescriptions (“if a man”). The commandments are uniformly coupled with promised blessings for faithful compliance. Thus, Latter-day Saints describe themselves as covenant people who may be rewarded now, and in the hereafter, for their faithfulness. Many such covenants are bilateral in character; that is, members make personal commitments in a variety of formal ordinances to keep in accord with certain commandments.

 

Spiritual laws, or God’s commandments, are generally understood to have been purposefully decreed by a loving Heavenly Father, who desires to bring to pass the exaltation of his spirit children. Thus, “there is a law, irrevocably decreed in heaven before the foundations of this world, upon which all blessings are predicated” (D&C 130:20). Latter-day Saints believe that God knows or stipulates all types of acts and forbearances required by all individuals in order for them to attain that blessed eternal state of exaltation and that he has revealed these requirements to humankind through his servants. No law given of God is temporal (D&C 29:34).

 

“Irrevocability” in the foregoing quotation connotes permanence and unchangeability. Since God cannot lie, the commandments and promises contained in his covenants with people will not be revoked, though he can revoke a specific commandment to individuals when they have disobeyed (D&C 56:3-6). The fundamentals are not situational and do not ebb and flow with changing concepts of morality or theology outside the Church. The President of the Church is a prophet of God who receives revelations and inspiration to interpret and apply those basic principles as human circumstances change.

 

In accordance with the principle of agency, God commands, but he does not compel. No earthly mechanism exists for the enforcement of God’s laws. The prophet teaches the members correct principles, and they are expected to govern themselves. Missionary work and education of Church members are carried out so that people may make informed choices. They are taught that making an informed choice results either in a blessing (current or deferred) or an undesirable consequence (current or deferred). Ignorance of the law is considered a legitimate excuse. Because of the Atonement of Jesus Christ, repentance is not required of those “who have ignorantly sinned” or “who have died not knowing the will of God concerning them” (Mosiah 3:11), even though failure to abide by the commandment may result in the loss of blessings that would flow from proper conduct. In most cases, violators of divine law can escape the punishment connected with the offense by repentance; the demands of justice having been satisfied by the Atonement of Christ in the interest of all (see Justice and Mercy).

 

 

(Encyclopedia of Mormonism, 1-4 vols., edited by Daniel H. Ludlow (New York: Macmillan, 1992), 807.)

 

 
Earth Life and the Spirit World = the 2nd Estate

Spirit World

 

 Death does not suddenly bestow upon the disbeliever full awareness of all reality, thereby obviating the need for any faith. Instead, what follows death is a continuum of the basic structure in mortality-until the Judgment Day, when every knee shall bow and every tongue confess that Jesus is the Christ (see Rom. 14:11; Philip. 2:10; D&C 76:110). Until then, we “walk by faith, not by sight” (2 Cor. 5:7). How will God ensure this condition in the spirit world? We do not know. Yet He has certainly so handled the second estate in relation to the first estate, hasn’t He? The memories of the first estate are not accessible in the second estate. The spirit world will be so arranged that there will be no legitimate complaints later over the justice and mercy of God (see Mosiah 27:31; Alma 12:15). (That Ye May Believe, p. 94.)

 

 

(Cory H. Maxwell, ed., The Neal A. Maxwell Quote Book [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1997], 323.)

In the Millennium there will be mortals as well as resurrected celestial beings living together with Christ.

Outer Darkness will be a place for those who refuse to obey or accept God.  Since they refuse to obey law there kingdom will be a place of chaos, no order, no law, and no glory.  The analogy of multiplying by 0 = 0

Joseph F. Smith, January 20, 1895

 

THE SECOND DEATH

 

DISCOURSE

Delivered by President Joseph F. Smith,

at the Oneida Stake Conference, Franklin, Idaho,

January 20, 1895.

 

 

No son of perdition, I take it, can be more completely lost than was Adam after the fall, so far as he himself was concerned. Somebody else had to reach down and help him up. Some other and higher power than his had to bring him forth out of the condition in which he had placed himself; for he was subject unto Satan and powerless and helpless in and of himself. The Gospel was, therefore, preached to him, and a way of escape from that spiritual death given unto him. That way of escape was through faith in God, repentance of sin, baptism for the remission of sins, the gift of the Holy Ghost by the laying on of hands. Thereby he received a knowledge of the truth and a testimony of Jesus Christ, and was redeemed from the spiritual death that came upon him, which was the first death, and a complete and perfect death, so far as spirit was concerned, although he lived and moved and had his being, as he did before he partook of the forbidden fruit and became spiritually dead; he had his entity and his organization; but he was spiritually dead, and he had to be redeemed from that condition.

 

Now, why I put so much stress upon this point is that I may impress upon you the word of God as declared to us; for He says:

 

Wherefore, I the Lord God caused that he should be cast out from the Garden of Eden, from my presence, because of his transgression, wherein he became spiritually dead, which is the first death, even that same death which is the last death, which is spiritual, which shall be pronounced upon the wicked when I say—Depart, ye cursed.

 

Thus we see that the first death which came into the world is also the last death which shall be pronounced upon the sons of perdition. What is it? Banishment from the presence of God. Banishment from the power of God. Banishment from the glory of God. Banishment from the joys of heaven. Banishment from all progress. Banishment into outer darkness. Banishment into hell, which is as a lake of fire and brimstone, where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched, because the soul lives and is bound to live on, suffering the damnation of hell. This is what I understand spiritual death is. I do not understand it to be the separation of the body and the spirit again. I do not understand it to be the dissolution of the spirit into its native element. I understand the second death to be the same as the first death—spiritual death; the same condition that Adam was in and that he had to be redeemed from by the blood of Christ, and by faith and obedience to the commands of God. By this means Adam was redeemed from the first death, and brought back again into the presence of God, back again into the favor of the Almighty, back again into the channel of eternal increase and progress. And if a man, after being placed in this condition, shall deny the Holy Ghost and Jesus Christ, putting Him again to open shame and crucifying Him afresh, then that first death which fell upon our first parents will again be pronounced upon that man, and it is not written that he shall ever be delivered from it. It is not written that there is any forgiveness for it, nor any redemption there from.

 

(Brian H. Stuy, ed., Collected Discourses, 5 vols. [Burbank, Calif., and Woodland Hills, Ut.: B.H.S. Publishing, 1987-1992], 4 :.)

(Doctrine and Covenants 77:6-7, 12-13)

 

6 Q. What are we to understand by the book which John saw, which was sealed on the back with seven seals?

A. We are to understand that it contains the revealed will, mysteries, and the works of God; the hidden things of his economy concerning this earth during the seven thousand years of its continuance, or its temporal existence.

 

7 Q. What are we to understand by the seven seals with which it was sealed?

A. We are to understand that the first seal contains the things of the first thousand years, and the second also of the second thousand years, and so on until the seventh.

 

12 Q. What are we to understand by the sounding of the trumpets, mentioned in the 8th chapter of Revelation?

A. We are to understand that as God made the world in six days, and on the seventh day he finished his work, and sanctified it, and also formed man out of the dust of the earth, even so, in the beginning of the seventh thousand years will the Lord God sanctify the earth, and complete the salvation of man, and judge all things, and shall redeem all things, except that which he hath not put into his power, when he shall have sealed all things, unto the end of all things; and the sounding of the trumpets of the seven angels are the preparing and finishing of his work, in the beginning of the seventh thousand years—the preparing of the way before the time of his coming.

 

13 Q. When are the things to be accomplished, which are written in the 9th chapter of Revelation?

A. They are to be accomplished after the opening of the seventh seal, before the coming of Christ.

 

  1. The book is sealed with 7 seals, meaning the earth’s temporal existence is 7000 years.
  2. Beginning of the 7th seal there will be wars and natural disasters, also 1/3 of water will be dried up and 1/3 of earth will be destroyed.

Again, more through what we learn from section 77 than through actual textual changes, the Prophet greatly adds to our understanding of what John saw as the various seals were opened. Nothing is said about the first five seals, either through section 77 or through JST changes. But when we get to the opening of the sixth and seventh seals—those of our own time, as it were—we are helped immensely and learn the following:

 

1. The "angel from the east" is” Elias (D&C 77:9). This at first may not seem helpful, but we know that the concept of Elias is as a forerunner and that here it refers to the restoration of the gospel in the last days. fn Applying that interpretation to John's vision makes perfect sense. Before the angels of destruction are loosed, the servants of God will be sealed and thus saved from destruction, through the restoration of the gospel, with its priesthood and ordinances. Commenting on these very verses, the Prophet later explained that the sealing "signifies sealing the blessing upon their heads, meaning the everlasting covenant, thereby making their calling and election sure. When a seal is put upon the father and mother, it secures their posterity, so that they cannot be lost, but will be saved by virtue of the covenant of their father and mother." fn”

2. The Prophet clearly indicates that the twelve thousand sealed from each of the twelve tribes is not just a symbolic representation of the forces of righteousness, as some scholars maintain. They are a great missionary force of the sixth seal (see D&C 77:10). Joseph Smith shows us that they are ordained high priests chosen from among every nation to carry forth the gospel and bring as many as will come to the true Church (see D&C 77:11). (In another revelation the Prophet indicated that these 144,000 would also stand on Mt. Zion with the Savior. See D&C 133:18 and compare with Revelation 14:1-5.)

 

The Prophet also said, shortly before his death, "I attended prayer-meeting with the quorum in the assembly room, and made some remarks respecting the hundred and forty-four thousand mentioned by John the Revelator, showing that the selection of persons to form that number had already commenced.” This statement would seem to indicate that this great body of missionaries may be composed of mortals and immortals together.

 

3. Though the Prophet did not give us specific help in interpreting the various images mentioned under the sounding of the seven trumpets that begin in chapter 8, two things he revealed are of great help as we study this section of Revelation. First, he revealed that the trumpets represent the judgments of God which will prepare the world and cleanse it for the millennial reign of Christ (see D&C 77:12). Second, he clearly specifies that these trumpets (or judgments) happen in the seventh seal (see D&C 77:12-13). Since the evidence suggests we have not yet entered that last period of a thousand years, this prophecy is yet future to us. In fact, once the judgments happen it may be that the imagery used by John in this section will become much more clear. It also tells us that any attempt to tie these judgments with past historical events is not justified.

 

4. In chapter 10, there is a brief pause in the description of the judgments in which John is given a little book to eat. This seems puzzling at first, but again the information revealed through the Prophet Joseph Smith helps us with the interpretation. He explains that the book is symbolic of the mission of John himself during these great events, which mission is to help gather the tribes of Israel (see D&C 77:14). We know from scripture that John is privileged to continue his ministry on the earth until the Savior returns (see John 21:22-23; D&C 7). It is almost as though the Lord says to John in chapter 10, "Since you will still be living at the time all these things I have shown you are transpiring, would you like to see what you will be doing?" At a conference of the Church in June 1831, the Prophet confirmed that the "little book mission" was” being fulfilled when he said that "John“ the Revelator was then among the ten tribes of Israel who had been led away by Shalmaneser, king of Assyria, to prepare them for their return from their long dispersion." fn”

6. Finally, we learn from the Prophet's revelations that the "two “witnesses" sent by John as playing a pivotal role in the great battle of Armageddon were two prophets raised up to the Jewish nation (not necessarily Jewish themselves, as some have maintained) in the last days, who would work among the Jewish people in their homeland (see D&C 77:15). Elder Bruce R. McConkie said that these two prophets would be "followers of that humble man, Joseph Smith. . . . No doubt they will be members of the Council of the Twelve or of the First Presidency of the Church." fn”

 

(Monte S. Nyman and Charles D. Tate, Jr., eds., Joseph Smith Translation: The Restoration of Plain and Precious Things [Provo: BYU Religious Studies Center, 1985], 263.)

The Olive Leaf

(D&C 88)

 

ROBERT J. MATTHEWS

 

Background to the Revelation

 

As noted in the heading of the 1981 edition of the Doctrine and Covenants, the content of section 88 was received in portions on at least three different dares. Verses 1-126 were received on 27 and 28 December 1832 (how much on the first day is not known), and vv. 127-37 were received on 3 January 1833. fn The date for vv. 138-41 is not known.

 

Those present on at least the first two dates were Joseph Smith, Sr., Sidney Rigdon, Orson Hyde, Joseph Smith, Jr., Hyrum Smith, Samuel H. Smith, Newel K. Whitney, Frederick G. Williams, Ezra Thayer, and John Murdock. Brother Williams served as scribe.

 

This revelation (or collection of revelations) came only two days after the vivid communication now identified as D&C 87, which deals with the wars and destructions about to come upon the earth and which will eventually lead to a "full end of all nations" (D&C 87:6; see also 130:12-17). After the stern warnings and declarations found in the revelation on war, it is interesting that the Prophet identified this revelation as "the olive leaf . . . plucked from the Tree of Paradise, the Lord's message of Peace to us." This document, which has a strong doctrinal content, contains some of the most marvelous instructions we have on record and is calculated not only to inform but also to inspire every person who carefully examines it. To study it is a mind-stretching experience. The language is simple and direct, but the meaning has such depth that a mortal cannot grasp its entirety.

 

Every reader will notice at the outset that the subject matter of section 88 changes frequently. This increases the difficulty of discussion in a written article, but we are greatly assisted by the voluminous footnotes and cross-references placed in the new edition of the Doctrine and Covenants published in 1981. By following these study aids, we can facilitate our understanding and will need a minimum of other written materials. Moreover, as one's familiarity and understanding increases, he will sense that the revelation flows naturally from one doctrinal concept to another and that the various subjects are vitally related to each other. This revelation, in its many topics, holds out promises and encouragement by giving a glimpse of what the purposes of God are and what our own future can be.

 

We will, in the pages that follow, present some of the more significant features of section 88 and endeavor to show relationships to the larger doctrinal and historical setting of the Church in this dispensation. Since not every verse can be dealt with in detail, attention will be given to concepts that seem necessary to enable us to grasp, at least to some degree, the depth and sublimity of the revelation. The format is a commentary, intended to be read in connection with the scriptural text. Let it be remembered, moreover, that these are the personal opinions of the writer and not necessarily the official position of the Church.

 

Significant Doctrinal Contributions

 

Lord of Sabaoth (v. 2). The term "Lord of Sabaoth" is also found in the New Testament (Rom. 9:29 and James 5:4) and is usually identified as "Lord of Hosts," that is, "Lord of Armies" or as "Ruler over all." The term "Lord of Hosts" (Yahweh Saba'oth) is very common in the Old Testament. The Hebrew word saba'oth means "hosts," or "armies." The word "Sabaoth" does not appear in the Book of Mormon or the Pearl of Great Price, although "Lord of Hosts" appears in a number of places in both of these works. The title "Lord of Sabaoth" occurs in D&C 87:7; 88:2; 95:7; and 98:2 and has a more extensive meaning than those unfamiliar with the Doctrine and Covenants give to it, with a unique declaration that the Lord of Sabaoth "is by interpretation, the creator of the first day, the beginning and the end" (D&C 95:7). Such a definition far exceeds the concept of just being Lord of many, because it places a time factor of being Lord at the beginning and even being the cause of or initiator of the "first day." This special primacy of Jesus is consistent with other concepts in section 88 that speak of Christ as the creator and the sustainer of the universe in an ultimate and infinite manner. This enlarged definition of Sabaoth enhances its use in 88:2 and is more descriptive than could be obtained from any source outside of the Doctrine and Covenants.

 

The Comforter or Promise of Eternal Life (vv. 3-4). The Comforter here spoken of is identified as the Holy Spirit of Promise and is thus the Holy Ghost. He is the "first Comforter." The second Comforter, as explained by the Prophet Joseph Smith, is the Lord Jesus Christ and has reference to a personal visit. fn The wording "another Comforter" has led some to wonder if this passage in 88:3-4 has reference to the Second Comforter, and not to the Holy Ghost. However, the personage spoken of is clearly the Holy Spirit of Promise, and "the Holy Spirit of Promise is not the Second Comforter." fn

 

Friends (v. 3). The close relationship of the Lord to his faithful servants is shown in his greeting them as friends. A servant carries out orders as he is commanded. A "friend" is one with whom the Lord confides his purposes and plans. This subject is touched upon again in D&C 93:45-46 and is more fully explained in John 15:13-15: "Henceforth I call you not servants; for the servant knoweth not what his lord doeth: but I have called you friends; for all things that I have heard of my Father I have made known unto you." The knowledge about to be entrusted to the Saints in this revelation is characteristic of that which would be shared by the Master with his faithful friends.

 

Church of the Firstborn (v. 5). This term occurs in the New Testament (Heb. 12:23) and also in several places in the Doctrine and Covenants (76:54, 67, 71, 94; 77:11; 78:21; 93:22; 107:19). It has reference to those who inherit the fulness of salvation and exaltation. They belong not only to the Church of Jesus Christ (who himself is the Firstborn), but they constitute a church, the membership of which consists only of those who are exalted and thus have the inheritance of the firstborn. They are joint heirs with Jesus in all that the Father has and are thus the Church consisting of the firstborn. This is what the gospel does for those who obey it fully; it causes them to be born again and gives them an adoption in the eternal patriarchal family so that they have an inheritance as the firstborn even though they are younger in actual chronology (see also ">L>). It has reference to those who inherit the fulness of salvation and exaltation. They belong not only to the Church of Jesus Christ (who himself is the Firstborn), but they constitute a church, the membership of which consists only of those who are exalted and thus have the inheritance of the firstborn. They are joint heirs with Jesus in all that the Father has and are thus the Church consisting of the firstborn. This is what the gospel does for those who obey it fully; it causes them to be born again and gives them an adoption in the eternal patriarchal family so that they have an inheritance as the firstborn even though they are younger in actual chronology (see also Gal. 3:26-27).

 

The Light of Christ (vv. 6-13). In some manner that we do not fully understand, these verses state that the light of Christ is in the sun, moon, stars, and in the earth also, and this light gives life to all things and is the law by which all things are governed. This light shines and is also called the "light of truth" (v. 6) and "is the same light that quickeneth your understandings" (v. 11).

 

Elder Orson Pratt commented on these verses as follows:

 

Who is there in this congregation, or upon the face of the earth, that can tell how that light operates in quickening the understandings of men? . . . Do you know how that is done? I do not; yet this is what God has revealed. He is the light that is in all things. Do you or I comprehend how that light is connected with all things? No. These are lessons which we have got to learn in the future, when we ascend in that scale of knowledge and intelligence now possessed by celestial beings. . . . We are told in this revelation that the light that quickens the understandings of the children of men and that lighteth all things is one and the same and that it is also the life of all things. What are we to understand by this? Have we life? Yes, we certainly have. Where did we obtain this life? When was it created or made? There is a revelation upon this subject which says that intelligence, or the light of truth, was not created, neither indeed can be [93:29]. Is it then eternal? Yes. Then this light that shines is eternal in its nature is it? Yes, because it is the same light that gives light to all things. fn

 

The Redemption of the Soul (vv. 14-17). The technical definition is that a "soul" consists of a spirit and a physical body. This is helpful in clarifying other passages of scripture dealing with the creation, such as Moses 3:7-9 and Abr. 5:7. The scriptures are not always consistent with the use of the word "soul," and sometimes it is used to mean only the spirit (Alma 40:21). The emphasis in the context of 88:14-17, however, is upon the resurrection and redemption of the soul along with the resurrection and redemption of the earth as a home on which glorified souls will live—and all this by the power of Jesus Christ.

 

Purpose and Destiny of the Earth (vv. 17-20, 25-27). The revelations of God frequently talk about the earth on which we live. In Abr. 3:24-25 we are told that one purpose for the earth is to provide a place where man may dwell and be proved—a probationary place. Section 88 deals with yet another factor—the eternal destiny of the earth is to be a celestial world, "sanctified from all unrighteousness," even worthy of the presence of God the Father (v. 18). Those who live on this earth who are meek and are redeemed and sanctified shall live on and possess this earth forever and ever in a resurrected state—resurrected bodies on a resurrected earth. For this intent the earth was made, and will die, and will be quickened.

 

The Earth Filleth the Measure of Its Creation (vv. 19, 25). This phrase appears twice in the revelation (vv. 19, 25). A similar phrase is used in D&C 49:16-17 with the explanation that to answer the purpose of its creation the earth must be filled with man (cf. also 1 Ne. 17:36). These references (combined with Abr. 3:24-25) give the clear scriptural statement that there is divine purpose both to man and to the earth: (1) in their creation, (2) in their present continuance, and (3) in their eternal destiny.

 

The revelation also reads as though the earth were intelligent. For example: "Verily I say unto you, the earth abideth the law of a celestial kingdom . . . and transgresseth not the law" (v. 25). Furthermore, in Moses 7:48-49 the earth is represented as speaking and experiencing pain because of the wickedness of mankind upon its surface. Many regard these as figurative expressions, but there may be something more literal involved. This factor will be considered further in connection with vv. 34-46.

 

Resurrection and Glory According to the Law which Is Obeyed (vv. 21-24, 28-33). These verses explain that every soul will be resurrected, some to glory and some to no glory, depending upon the law each person chose to obey. The law of Christ—the gospel—leads to a fulness of celestial glory. Any deviation leads to less. In these passages, "quickened" has reference to resurrection, and this quickening comes to all. Verses 24, 32, and 33 clearly indicate that the class of persons known as sons of perdition shall be "quickened," that is, they will be resurrected in their physical body but not to a place of glory, for they failed to receive the only gift (the atonement of Christ) that could have redeemed them. This is a clarification of D&C 76:38-39, which some have misinterpreted to mean that the sons of perdition would not receive the resurrection of the body. fn

 

All Kingdoms Are Governed by Law (vv. 34-45). A key sentence in this passage states that God "hath given a law unto all things, by which they move in their times and seasons; and their courses are fixed, even the courses of the heavens and the earth . . . and all the planets" (vv. 42-43). At least two basic concepts are emphasized here: (1) God is the Author and the Giver of the law, not just a user of it, and (2) there is obedience in the universe. These are both fundamental to the existence of the Lord's kingdoms. Only a limited discussion of these matters is presented here. fn

 

As to the "obedience" of the planets and especially of the earth, the question arises whether it is forced obedience or if there is agency and intelligence in nature (other than in man). Elder Orson Pratt felt there was intelligent choice:

 

There does not seem to be any agency on the part of these materials [inanimate things], so far as we naturally comprehend it; at least, if there is an agency, it seems to be very obedient instead of disobedient . . . at least we do not know of any disobedience. . . . There are some sayings in this same revelation which seem to indicate that there is a degree of intelligence even in these materials [referring to the earth as in v. 25]. . . . Some . . . might say that the earth is obliged to follow this course. I do not know about this. I am not so sure. I think if we could see a little further, we would understand that, connected with the materials of the earth is a living principle . . . that acts according to certain laws, intelligently, not blindly; and that our earth, in performing its course . . . does so according to law, as much as we do when we go forth and are buried in the waters of baptism. fn

 

Man Shall Eventually Comprehend Even God (vv. 47-50, 66-69). There are some wonderfully descriptive concepts about God in these verses, such as majesty, power, light, truth, Spirit, wilderness, and the unveiling of his face to man. Concerning our relationship to God, we are told in these verses that as we witness the pattern and order of the cosmos we have already seen him moving in his majesty and power; that eventually righteous men shall comprehend God by "being quickened in him and by him" (v. 49); and that God sustains man by his (God's) light. It is also stated that God's voice is Spirit and that mortal man hears it as a voice in the wilderness—"in the wilderness, because we cannot see him" (v. 66). The Lord continues the instruction by saying that if we have an eye single to his glory, our whole bodies shall be filled with light, and by that means we shall be able to see God and also be able to comprehend all things. These verses are a continuation of the revelation on light given in vv. 6-13 already discussed, and they also add to an earlier exposition about light given in D&C 50:23-30. This is such an important subject that yet a further revelation about light is to be found in D&C 93:26-32. The frequency of the instruction about light suggests that it is important for us to know about it; that the Lord wants us to know; and that it is a subject difficult for us to understand in our mortal state.

 

These passages speak of man seeing the face of God and even comprehending him (which means understanding him), and of man himself knowing all things. Such accomplishments are not by intellectual learning or by research alone, great as these are as aids to arriving at the truth. A careful reading of the above passages shows clearly that man obtains great spiritual heights and privileges only by having an eye single to the glory of God, obeying the commandments, hearing the voice of the Spirit, and being "quickened" by the Lord. This is not secular but spiritual. To obtain these blessings, man must lift his thoughts from nature (the things that are created) up to nature's Author (the Creator). This is the special role of revealed religion and the purpose of the gospel of Jesus Christ, as contrasted with the pursuit of other kinds of truth. Secular learning is an aid, but is separate and distinct from the kind of learning that leads mankind to a full knowledge and acquaintance with God. A study of nature (the earth and all things in the earth or connected with the earth) and the creations beyond the sphere of this earth (that is, a study of the physical things that God has created)—astronomy—is an honorable and necessary pursuit; but to realize his potential, man must do more than that; he must also comprehend even God. The things of God are such that they can be learned only by revelation; therefore, a study of the revelations which make known the character of God and what he requires of man are absolutely essential for salvation (see Mosiah 4:9; Job 11:7). Man will not comprehend God unless he becomes like him, and this is not an easy accomplishment and cannot be obtained outside of the gospel of Jesus Christ. As the Prophet Joseph Smith explained:

 

A fanciful and flowery and heated imagination beware of; because the things of God are of deep import; and time, and experience, and careful and ponderous and solemn thoughts can only find them out. Thy mind, O man! if thou wilt lead a soul unto salvation, must stretch as high as the utmost heavens, and search into and contemplate the darkest abyss, and the broad expanse of eternity—thou must commune with God. How much more dignified and noble are the thoughts of God, than the vain imaginations of the human heart! fn

 

And again from the Prophet:

 

Let us here observe, that after any portion of the human family are made acquainted with the important fact that there is a God, who has created and does uphold all things, the extent of their knowledge respecting his character and glory will depend upon their diligence and faithfulness in seeking after him, until, like Enoch, the brother of Jared, and Moses, they shall obtain faith in God, and power with him to behold him face to face. fn

 

And yet again from the Prophet:

 

We consider that God has created man with a mind capable of instruction, and a faculty which may be enlarged in proportion to the heed and diligence given to the light communicated from heaven to the intellect; and that the nearer man approaches perfection, the clearer are his views, and the greater his enjoyments, till he has overcome the evils of his life and lost every desire for sin; and like the ancients, arrives at that point of faith where he is wrapped in the power and glory of his Maker and is caught up to dwell with Him. But we consider that this is a station to which no man ever arrived in a moment: he must have been instructed in the government and laws of that kingdom by proper degrees, until his mind is capable in some measure of comprehending the propriety, justice, equality, and consistency of the same. fn

 

Perhaps two further points should be discussed relative to v. 66. The Lord here states that his voice is Spirit and that his Spirit is truth. The revelation says that man hears the voice of the Lord by hearing the Spirit. This is similar to D&C 18:34-36, in which the Lord says that those who have felt and heard his Spirit "can testify that they have heard my voice, and know my words" (18:36). This is an informative definition of what it means to hear the voice of the Lord.

 

The other point is occasioned by the Lord stating that he is a voice in the wilderness—in the wilderness because we cannot see him (v. 66). These words are followed two verses later by the explanation that if one sanctifies himself so that his mind becomes single to God, the day will come when he will see God. Note the contrast between mortal man being in the wilderness at first, but growing in light until he sees God. That is, when the Lord unveils his face to a friend, that person is in the wilderness no longer. What beautiful imagery!

 

A Parable about the Inhabitants of Other Worlds (vv. 51-65). After declaring the existence, harmony, and relationship of the various bodies that constitute the heavenly machinery, including the sun, moon, stars and planets, the Lord asked: "Unto what shall I liken these kingdoms that ye may understand? Behold, all these are kingdoms" (vv. 46-47). In answer to his own question the Lord gives a parable of a man sending his servants into the field and visiting each of them in turn. He would withdraw from one to visit another. Each servant saw his Lord's countenance and was made glad—"every man in his hour, and in his time, and in his season. . . . Every man in his own order" (vv. 51-60). "Therefore," said the Lord, "unto this parable I will liken all these kingdoms [the worlds he has created], and the inhabitants thereof every kingdom in its hour, and in its time, and in its season, even according to the decree which God hath made" (v. 61).

 

This parable is one of the plainest assertions in the scriptures that there are inhabitants on other worlds, and that Jesus Christ is their Savior and Lord, visiting each in its time (cf. D&C 76:23-24). fn

 

The Solemn Assembly; a Great and Last Promise (vv. 69-76). The Lord instructed the Prophet to call a solemn assembly of the "first laborers in this last kingdom." This was to be held in Kirtland and was to include a spiritual manifestation to those who were worthy. Much needed to be done in anticipation. They were to prepare their hearts and minds, rid themselves of idle thoughts and of excess laughter. Those expecting to be invited to attend were to organize themselves and sanctify their lives, purify their hearts and cleanse their hands and feet, in order that they would be "clean from the blood of this wicked generation" (vv. 69, 74, 75).

 

The instruction to hold a solemn assembly comes immediately following the promise that the day will come when the faithful will see the face of the Lord, and thus it is clear these two circumstances are related. That the Lord would show himself to his servants and give them the transcendent joy that accompanies a personal visit from their Savior is called "the great and last promise" (vv. 69, 75), and the Lord said he would fulfill it if his people would prepare themselves.

 

The words "great and last promise" attract our attention, and we wish the revelation provided a direct definition of how the word "last" is used in this instance. Certainly the meaning is not that this was the final (or chronologically last) promise he would make to his servants. The meaning therefore seems to be that this was the ultimate promise—that is, that when they were ready, they would see his face and stand in his presence. The feeling is also contained in the passage that this was the last promise until they had accomplished the preparation needed to obtain the promise the Lord had given them.

 

A few days after receiving section 88, the Prophet Joseph Smith sent a copy of the revelation to the Brethren in Missouri and told them of the anticipated visit of the Savior in the forthcoming assembly. Part of his letter reads:

 

[14 January 1833] You will see that the Lord commanded us, in Kirtland, to build a house of God, and establish a school for the Prophets, this is the word of the Lord to us, and we must, yea, the Lord helping us, we will obey: as on condition of our obedience He has promised us great things; yea, even a visit from the heavens to honor us with His own presence. We greatly fear before the Lord lest we should fail of this great honor, which our Master proposes to confer on us; we are seeking for humility and great faith lest we be ashamed in His presence. fn

 

Subsequently the Prophet gave repeated instruction to the brethren about the preparation they must make to be ready for the assembly, which would not be held for some years in the future. We note one such instance in the following:

 

[12 November 1835] We must have all things prepared, and call our solemn assembly as the Lord has commanded us. . . . The endowment you are so anxious about, you cannot comprehend now . . . but strive to be prepared in your hearts . . . when we meet in the solemn assembly we must be clean every whit. . . . If we are faithful . . . I will venture to prophesy that we will get a blessing that will be worth remembering, if we should live as long as John the Revelator; our blessings will be such as we have not realized before, nor received in this generation. . . .

 

All who are prepared, and are sufficiently pure to abide the presence of the Savior will see him in the solemn assembly. fn

 

The assembly was not held until the temple was completed. Finally on 30 March 1836, three days after the temple was dedicated, the meeting was convened. It lasted more than a day and a night. The Prophet referred to the spiritual experiences as "a day of Pentecost," and said that "speaking in tongues was manifest, the Savior made his appearance to some, and angels ministered to others." fn

 

The term "solemn assembly" is mentioned several times in the Old Testament, one notable occurrence being just after the dedication of the temple by King Solomon (2 Chron. 7:9). Other occurrences had to do with special events and fast days in the history of Israel.

 

An Informed Ministry; Knowledge by Study and by Faith (vv. 77-86, 117-18). In order that the servants of the Lord might effectively carry the message of the restoration to the inhabitants of the earth, the Lord specified that they should study and become acquainted with many branches of knowledge in addition to the doctrines of the kingdom (vv. 77-80). They were to "seek learning, by study and also by faith" (v. 118). What it means to seek learning "by study" we already know something about, but how to seek learning "by faith" requires even more experience and serious contemplation. Whatever else is required in order for one to seek learning by faith, at least two factors have to be recognized. First, the individual seeking the learning must have an eye single to the glory of God—his motives cannot be selfish. Second, he has to trust the revealed word of God as being true. If he wants to gain spiritual knowledge for himself, he has to believe that what the Lord has already revealed in the scriptures is correct, especially the latter-day scriptures. He then proceeds to study, using the scriptures as the standard by which to measure and interpret whatever knowledge he may gain in the other branches of learning. This would seem to be true in all subject matter areas but especially in the study of fields closely related to human behavior and potential.

 

Although all truth is valuable, some areas are more critical for preparing the elders for their ministry to the nations of the earth and also for their own salvation and spiritual welfare. President Brigham Young spoke of a "perfect celestial science" which he defined as the study of all truth and useful information gained through books, experience and revelation. He emphasized, however, the single importance of theology:

 

Do the Elders of Israel understand all that the Lord requires of them? They do not. . . . They can learn from themselves—from the world—from the government of heaven—from the management, government, control, doctrines, and laws of eternity, which will yet be exhibited before us. The Lord has established the world with its varied productions, for the education of his children. . . .

 

. . . There are a great many branches of education: some go to college to learn languages, some to study law, some to study physic, and some to study astronomy, and various other branches of science. We want every branch of science taught in this place that is taught in the world. But our favourite study is that branch which particularly belongs to the Elders of Israel—namely, theology. Every Elder should become a profound theologian—should understand this branch better than all the world. There is no Elder who has the power of God upon him but understands more of the principles of theology than all the world put together. fn

 

The type of individuals which the Lord requires for his ministry are those persons whose garments are clean from the blood of this generation. Those not yet clean were to wait for another time to be called. Those who were called were to labor diligently to warn the people of the judgments to come. The brethren were told in the revelation that not everyone will accept the message, and that one aspect of their teaching was to issue a warning voice so as to leave the world "without excuse"; in this way "their sins are upon their own heads" (vv. 81-82). The number of converts one makes is not the measure of success of the mission. The Prophet Joseph Smith explained:

 

It is not the multitude of preachers that is to bring about the glorious millennium! but it is those who are "called, and chosen, and faithful." . . . Remember that your business is to preach the Gospel in all humility and meekness, and warn sinners to repent and come to Christ. . . . If you do your duty, it will be just as well with you, as though all men embraced the Gospel. fn

 

Signs, Earthly Commotions, and Angels Prepare the Way for the Second Coming (vv. 87-116). This large segment of section 88 bears a striking similarity to chapters 7-22 in the book of Revelation. It is a prophecy of destruction and calamity but also a message of hope. It is, as with all revealed scripture, an assurance that in the end righteousness will triumph over evil; Christ over the devil; the Saints over their oppressors. Ultimate victory will come through the Lord Jesus Christ.

 

The Prophet had been involved for many months with making an initial draft of an inspired translation of the New Testament, concluding with the book of Revelation in March 1832. In the process of making the translation, many important things were revealed to him about the gospel and in this case about future events to take place on the earth (see D&C 45:60-62). The history of the earth, the ministry of seven angels who play a prominent part in the final judgment scenes, and the opening of the seven seals are significant aspects of the Revelation of John. These were reiterated and partially explained in D&C 77 as a consequence of the translation and were further enlarged upon in these verses from section 88. Thus we regard this part of section 88 as a further clarification and explanation of the Revelation of John. These are eschatological items—the winding-up events to take place on the earth before it is prepared for the celestial glory. All nations must hear the proclamation of the gospel and be informed of the means of redemption. The earth must die and wickedness be cleansed from off its face. There will be a resurrection of all mankind and a final judgment. Through faith in Jesus the Saints will have gained the victory over sin and death and will be crowned with eternal glory (vv. 106-7). The calamities and convulsive quaking of the earth, the wars and the pestilences spoken of in these verses are the "details" involved in the larger concept of the earth being prepared for its eternal celestial destiny.

 

Before these final things occur, however, the servants of God must prepare themselves for their mission to the world. Therefore, the Lord again took up the subject of the temple and the school, because without these, the missionaries could not be prepared for their ministry. Without the servants of God bearing testimony, the honest in heart would not be gathered and the unrepentant would not be warned and left without excuse.

 

A House of Learning; a House of God (vv. 117-37). In the remaining verses of the revelation, the Lord outlined the procedure for the School of the Prophets and the establishment of a house—a temple—for the School and other sacred purposes. The house is referred to as a place of prayer, fasting, faith, learning, glory, and order, which is therefore "a house of God" (v. 119).

 

One of the most apparent factors of this part of the revelation is that knowledge, wisdom, books, learning, faith, prayer, glory, and fasting are all closely associated. Learning and wisdom are not solely intellectual pursuits but are linked with faith, prayer and fasting. "The School of the Prophets" thus presents the highest and the best ideal in education. It is a symbol of inspired learning and shows that true education cannot be separated from a spiritual and divine purpose.

 

In order for mortal men and women to be able to learn essential truths, there has to be a certain mind-set and spiritual preparation. This revelation states that intellectual attainment is inseparably connected with both physical and spiritual characteristics. Thus the instructions are given that those who were to participate in the School were also to cease from lightmindedness, loud laughter, pride, lustful desires, covetousness, idleness, uncleanness, fault finding, and excessive sleep (vv. 122-24). In addition, they were to practice diligence, study, faith, prayer, love for one another, charity, and were to retire to bed early and arise early (vv. 118,123,125, 126).

 

The School of the Prophets called for a mix of hard intellectual effort and inspiration from the Holy Ghost, and characterized a very particular kind of educational process. Learning was to be assisted by the light of the gospel and the light of inspiration. The role the Holy Ghost plays in enabling one to learn was explained dramatically by Elder Orson Pratt:

 

What does [the Holy Ghost] do for the education of men? Far more than our academies do. Our children have, by hard study, year after year, to acquire their learning in these human institutions; hard thinking is necessary, reasoning, gaining little by little, and it frequently requires many years of close application to become what is termed a learned man—a man that understands the sciences, that has worked his way through the various departments of mathematics, and perhaps geology, and mineralogy, and all the sciences, such as are usually taught in universities. But the man filled with the Holy Ghost has the advantage of students who graduate at our universities. Why? Because he can learn more in ten minutes, in regard to many things, than another, not so favored, can in all his life. Indeed, he can learn some things by the operations of the Holy Ghost, which no natural man or woman could learn, however gifted they might be. You may inquire where they could learn these things? I answer, by the revelations of the Holy Ghost, which brings to light many things that are past, and shows things that are in the future. The Lord . . . opens the past and future to the minds of men, just as Jesus promised his disciples when he was about to leave them. "Howbeit when he, the Spirit of Truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth; and he will show you things to come" (John 16:13). fn

 

With v. 126 the original revelation is concluded. The portion from v. 127 onward was added on 3 January 1833, and one notices a change in the literary style in the second part. It is equally inspired and informative but seems less poetic and more prosaic.

 

The order of the school in the house of God is presented, showing proper greetings of the brethren. The president of the School is to enter the room first and hold a place of honor. With uplifted hands, the president shall greet the members in the name of the Lord in token of the everlasting covenant (vv. 127-37).

 

The School first met in an upstairs room of the Gilbert and Whitney store in Kirtland. Later it met in a building near the temple, and finally in an upstairs room of the temple (see D&C 95:17). A similar school was held in Missouri for a short time (D&C 97:3-6). fn

 

It was while the School was meeting in the store that a question arose about the use of alcohol and tobacco in the School. At the Prophet's inquiry, he received the "Word of Wisdom" on 27 February 1833, which is now known as D&C 89. This section (and section 88) both show that there is a connection between physical things and intellectual and spiritual attainment. One of the promises for obedience to the principles of the Word of Wisdom is to "find wisdom, and great treasures of knowledge, even hidden treasures (D&C 89:19). This information could well have been included in the instruction about the School of the Prophets in section 88, because it is of the same general nature. The guidelines given in section 88 about the School, especially concerning sleep, could be part of the "Word of Wisdom." From this instance, as with many others, we can see that revelations come in a progressive manner, as they are needed and asked for, and as the people are able to bear them, line upon line, here and there a little.

 

As noted, the School of the Prophets was to include only those who were totally dedicated to the Lord and who were clean from sin. In June 1833, the Lord rebuked the brethren because "contentions arose in the school," which the Lord said was "a very grievous sin" (D&C 95:10). It was also in the School of the Prophets that the excellent lessons known as the seven "Lectures on Faith" were taught. fn

 

The Schools were eventually discontinued in Kirtland and in Missouri and revived again in the West under the direction of the First Presidency. The School of the Prophets still exists today but is limited to the First Presidency and the Quorum of the Twelve. It may formally be expanded at some future time to include others, in preparation for their ministry to the nations of the earth.

 

The Washing of Feet (vv. 138-41). Membership in the School was specifically declared to be reserved for those who are "clean from the blood of this generation" (v. 138); they were to be received into the School by the washing of feet, administered by the president of the Church. It was to be preceded by partaking of the sacramental emblems of the Savior's flesh and blood (vv. 139-41). Concerning the washing of feet, the Prophet Joseph Smith said:

 

The item to which I wish the more particularly to call your attention to-night, is the ordinance of washing of feet. This we have not done as yet, but it is necessary now, as much as it was in the days of the Savior; and we must have a place prepared, that we may attend to this ordinance aside from the world. . . .

 

We must have all things prepared, and call our solemn assembly as the Lord has commanded us, that we may be able to accomplish His great work, and it must be done in God's own way. The house of the Lord must be prepared, and the solemn assembly called and organized in it, according to the order of the house of God; and in it we must attend to the ordinance of washing of feet. It was never intended for any but official members. It is calculated to unite our hearts, that we may be one in feeling and sentiment, and that our faith may be strong, so that Satan cannot overthrow us, nor have any power over us here. fn

 

Conclusion

 

It cannot be emphasized too greatly that section 88 is one of the most glorious documents given to man for his spiritual progress and attainment. It speaks of things in a simple, straightforward manner yet deals with concepts so profound and far-reaching that it takes extensive study and contemplation just to appreciate its grandeur. The careful reader is literally bathed in light as a consequence of the experience. One of the things this revelation does for the reader is to lay before him the high priority the Lord has placed on learning and the acquisition of knowledge. Yet it makes unmistakably clear that this is not a cold intellectual pursuit but a spiritual attainment.

 

Another characteristic that becomes clear from a study of this revelation is the consistency of its content with earlier revelation and an awareness that later revelations continue to expand upon the same themes.

 

The student of section 88 is rewarded with an enlarged view of the purposes of God, the coming of future events on the earth, and the role of the servants of the Lord in helping to prepare for the Second Coming of the Savior. The reader also senses more fully the promises that are made to individuals. When one begins to understand these things, he is encouraged to prepare himself, by study and by faith, to contribute whatever he can to help the eternal purposes of the Lord roll forward. We thus appreciate a little of what the Prophet had in mind when he named it the "Olive Leaf, . . . the Lord's message of peace to us." fn

 

Notes The Olive Leaf

 

1. A discussion of this is found in Robert J. Woodford, "The Historical Development of the Doctrine and Covenants," Ph.D. dissertation, Brigham Young University, 1974, pp. 1127-28.

 

2. TPJS, pp. 149-51.

 

3. Joseph Fielding Smith, Doctrines of Salvation, 3 vols., comp. Bruce R. McConkie (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1954-56), 1:55.

 

4. From an address given in Salt Lake City, 14 March 1875, contained in N. B. Lundwall (compiler and publisher), Wonders of the Universe (Salt Lake City: 1937), p. 198.

 

5. See Larry E. Dahl, "The Vision of the Glories," found herein, note 18; see also the footnote to D&C 76:39, 1981 edition, which also clarifies this point.

 

6. See LaMar E. Garrard, "What is Man?," Hearken, O Ye People: Discourses on the Doctrine and Covenants (Salt Lake City: Randall Book Co., 1984), pp. 133-49.

 

7. JD 21:233-34.

 

8. TPJS, p. 137.

 

9. N. B. Lundwall, comp., Lectures on Faith (Salt Lake City: N. B. Lundwall, n. d.), Lecture 2, paragraph 55.

 

10. TPJS, p. 51.

 

11. See Joseph Smith's poetic version of the Vision of the Glories, vv. 19-20, in Dahl, "The Vision of the Glories," found herein.

 

12. TPJS, p. 19.

 

13. Ibid., pp. 91-92.

 

14. HC 2:432-33. For a colorful and informative account of the spiritual manifestations connected with the Kirtland Temple and the solemn assembly, see Milton V. Backman, Jr., The Heavens Resound (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1983), pp. 284-309. See also Milton V. Backman, Jr. and Robert L. Millet, "Heavenly Manifestations in the Kirtland Temple," found herein.

 

15. JD 6:317.

 

16. TPJS, pp. 42-43.

 

17. JD 19:284.

 

18. For a discussion of the School of the Prophets, see Lyndon W. Cook, The Revelations of the Prophet Joseph Smith (Provo, Ut.: Seventy's Mission Bookstore, 1981), pp. 185-90.

 

19. For a brief account of these "Lectures" see John A. Widtsoe, "Historical Sketch of the Lectures on Faith," pp. 3-6 in Lundwall, comp., Lectures on Faith.

 

20. TPJS, pp. 90-91.

 

21. HC 1:316.

 

(Robert L. Millet and Kent P. Jackson, eds., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 1: The Doctrine and Covenants [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1989],.)

Gospel’s purpose:

We need to get people ready for the Millennium (this is the only dispensation that has had this purpose).

The Millennial Mission of the Church


In the conference that President Gordon B. Hinckley was sustatined as President of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, he made this statement:

Now, my brethren and sisters, the time has come for us to stand a little taller, to lift our eyes and stretch our minds to a greater comprehension and understanding of the grand millennial mission of this The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. This is a season to be strong. It is a time to move forward without hesitation, knowing well the meaning, the breadth, and the importance of our mission.  (“This Is the Work of the Master,” Ensign, May 1995, p. 71).

Ten years later while giving an account of his stewardship to the Church, he began by repeating the above statement (see “Opening Remarks,” Ensign, May 2005, p. 4).  He concluded that report by saying:

I now repeat what I said 10 years ago, let us “stand a little taller … lift our eyes and stretch our minds to a greater comprehension and understanding of the grand millennial mission of this The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.”

 

What is the millennial mission of the Church?  We are given insight into the millennail mission of the Church from Moroni.  In 1842, Joseph Smith wrote the following:

On the evening on the 21st of September, A.D. 1823, while I was praying unto God, and endeavoring to exercise faith in the precious promises of Scripture, on a sudden a light like that of day, only of a far purer and more glorious appearance and brightness, burst into the room indeed the first sight was as though the house was filled with consuming fire; the appearance produced a shock that affected the whole body; in a moment a personage stood before me surrounded with a glory yet greater than that with which I was already surrounded. This messenger proclaimed himself to be an angel of God, sent to bring the joyful tidings that the covenant which God made with ancient Israel was at hand to be fulfilled, that the preparatory work for the second coming of the Messiah was speedily to commence; that the time was at hand for the Gospel in all its fullness to be preached in power, unto all nations that a people might be prepared for the Millennial reign. I was informed that I was chosen to be an instrument in the hands of God to bring about some of His purposes in this glorious dispensation."  (History of the Church, Vol.4: p. 536)

 

There has been and will be great enlightenment and advancement since the Restoration to get people ready, but these advancements can be used for good or evil.


Blessings

   All laws have these characteristics                    Law            D&C 88:41 – All things come from God

Punishment

 

Those who cleave to God and those who don’t

(Moses 1:30-36.)

 

30 And it came to pass that Moses called upon God, saying: Tell me, I pray thee, why these things are so, and by what thou madest them?

 

31 And behold, the glory of the Lord was upon Moses, so that Moses stood in the presence of God, and talked with him face to face. And the Lord God said unto Moses: For mine own purpose have I made these things. Here is wisdom and it remaineth in me.

 

32 And by the word of my power, have I created them, which is mine Only Begotten Son, who is full of grace and truth.

 

33 And worlds without number have I created; and I also created them for mine own purpose; and by the Son I created them, which is mine Only Begotten.

 

34 And the first man of all men have I called Adam, which is many.

 

35 But only an account of this earth, and the inhabitants thereof, give I unto you. For behold, there are many worlds that have passed away by the word of my power. And there are many that now stand, and innumerable are they unto man; but all things are numbered unto me, for they are mine and I know them.

 

36 And it came to pass that Moses spake unto the Lord, saying: Be merciful unto thy servant, O God, and tell me concerning this earth, and the inhabitants thereof, and also the heavens, and then thy servant will be content.

 

By the Son of God, worlds without end have been created.  Some have already come and gone, we are not alone in the universe.

As the offspring of God, man is a creature of the universe, inhabiting many spheres in eternity. In perpetuating His offspring, God has created worlds without number. To some of the ancient patriarchs and prophets, God revealed the magnitude of His creations. Consequently, they knew much about the universe. Like Methuselah, Abraham saw Kolob and the great stellar system that is under the government of that central orb. Moses was also informed of the vastness of God's creations, and that God is continually organizing worlds as a part of His work of bringing to pass the immortality and eternal life of man. God's ultimate purpose is to glorify that which He creates. To this end, he organizes life that it might acquire greater intelligence, and continue to increase in intelligence. In this way, God develops His glory and power within all things.

 

By the power that is centered in the Only Begotten, the Man of Holiness has organized worlds without number. By means of the divine union which Jesus has with His Father in glory, He knows all things within the Father's vast domain. Thereby all things within the Father's kingdom are present before His eyes. Because Christ possesses a fulness of the Father's glory, He also has all power in heaven and on earth.

 

There are patriarchal kingdoms one above another in eternity, and intelligences exist one above another so that there is no end to them so far as present knowledge indicates. As the over-all patriarchal system moves upward, Elohim, the Man of Holiness, progresses in posterity, in dominion, and in glory. He is continually begetting children in eternity; and His creative works continue that He may provide spheres on which they may dwell. But His final purpose is to glorify that which He creates. When those who subordinate themselves to Him in truth consecrate themselves and all they possess to Him, His dominion and power are extended and His glory is increased. "God” is thus glorified and exalted in the salvation and exaltation of his children."  (”PJS, p. 348) The Lord therefore said: "This“is my work and my glory—to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of man." fn”

(Hyrum L. Andrus, Doctrinal Commentary on the Pearl of Great Price [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1967], 508 - 50–.)

(Doctrine and Covenants 88:28-30.)

 

28 They who are of a celestial spirit shall receive the same body which was a natural body; even ye shall receive your bodies, and your glory shall be that glory by which your bodies are quickened.

 

29 Ye who are quickened by a portion of the celestial glory shall then receive of the same, even a fulness.

 

30 And they who are quickened by a portion of the terrestrial glory shall then receive of the same, even a fulness.

We are resurrected to the kingdom according to how we choose to live.    Intelligence organizes things; something left alone will go into chaos.  Science says creation happens by chance, yet nothing on the earth supports that claim.

(Alma 13:30.)

30 And may the Lord grant unto you repentance, that ye may not bring down his wrath upon you, that ye may not be bound down by the chains of hell, that ye may not suffer the second death.

The city of Ammonihah said they couldn’t be destroyed, yet they were by the order of Nehor.  They rejected the gospel message.

1 Nephi 21:26, 22:13-14 – There is a war between the church of God and the church of the devil, Isaiah saw it as well as Nephi.  The wicked will destroy themselves.

 

(1 Nephi 22:13-14.)

 

13 And the blood of that great and abominable church, which is the whore of all the earth, shall turn upon their own heads; for they shall war among themselves, and the sword of their own hands shall fall upon their own heads, and they shall be drunken with their own blood.

 

14 And every nation which shall war against thee, O house of Israel, shall be turned one against another, and they shall fall into the pit which they digged to ensnare the people of the Lord. And all that fight against Zion shall be destroyed, and that great whore, who hath perverted the right ways of the Lord, yea, that great and abominable church, shall tumble to the dust and great shall be the fall of it.

 

God deals with law, he governs by eternal laws, and it is what makes creation work.

 

Divine and Eternal Law

 

LDS revelation emphasizes the existence and indispensability of law. The relation of divine law to other species of law has not been given systematic treatment in Mormon thought as it has in traditional Christian theology (e.g., the Summa Theologica of Thomas Aquinas). But distinctive observations about divine law and eternal law may be drawn from Latter-day scriptures and related sources.

 

Aquinas identified four categories of law: (1) eternal law, which is coextensive with the divine mind and with the overall purpose and plan of God; (2) natural law, which addresses mankind's proper participation in eternal law but is discovered by reason without the assistance of revelation and promulgation; (3) divine positive law, also a part of the eternal law, which pertains to the sacraments and ordinances necessary to the attainment of mankind's supernatural end made known by revelation; and (4) man-made positive law, which regulates the affairs of mankind not specifically addressed by God's law (e.g., laws that regulate such things as corporations, stocks, bonds, wills, and trusts) or which mandate the natural law with the power of the state.

 

LDS sources affirm laws roughly corresponding to each of these four types. Unlike traditional Jewish and Christian theologies, which place God outside of, and antecedent to, nature, however, LDS theology places God within nature.

 

"Divine" laws are instituted by God to govern his creations and kingdoms and to prescribe behavior for his offspring. Such law, in the terms of Acquinas's categories, would be divine positive law (i.e., law existing by virtue of being posited or enacted by God). Some Latter-day Saints believe that "eternal" la” is self-existent, unauthored law, which God himself honors and administers as a condition of his perfection and Godhood. It should be noted that the adjectives "divine" an” "eternal" do” not have fixed usages in writing (see Time and Eternity).

 

Latter-day scriptures and other sources do not explicitly state that eternal law exists independently or coeternally with God. This characteristic of eternal law is sometimes inferred, however, from two concepts that do have support in scripture and other LDS sources:

1. God is governed (bound) by law. Latter-day scriptures state that "God” would cease to be God" if” he were to allow mercy to destroy justice, or justice to overpower mercy, or the plan of redemption to be fulfilled on unjust conditions (Alma 42:13). Scriptures further state that "I, “he Lord, am bound when ye do what I say" (D”C 82:10), implying that God by nature and definition-not by any external coercion-is righteous and trustworthy. Some Church writers have said that "[Go“] himself governs and is governed by law" (M”, p. 432) and that "the” Lord works in accordance with natural law" (D” 2:27). They likewise speak of "higher laws" that account for providence and miracles.

 

2. Intelligence and truth were not created; they are coeternal with God. "Intelligence, or the light of truth, was not created or made, neither indeed can be. All truth is independent in that sphere in which God has placed it, to act for itself, as all intelligence also; otherwise there is no existence" (D”C 93:29-30). Joseph Smith expanded upon this teaching in his king Follett discourse, stating that "we “infer that God had materials to organize the world out of chaos…. Element had an existence from the time he had. The pure principles of element…had no beginning, and can have no end…. The mind or the intelligence which man possesses is coeternal with God himself" (T”JS, pp. 350-53). If truth and intelligence were not created by God and are coeternal with him, it may be that they are ordered by and function according to eternal laws or principles that are self-existent. This may be implied in Joseph Smith's phrase "law“of eternal and self-existent principles" (T”JS, p. 181).

 

Consistent with the eternal laws, God fashions and decrees laws that operate in the worlds he creates and that set standards of behavior that must be observed in order to obtain the blessing promised upon obedience to that law. Joseph Smith taught that "[Go“] was the first Author of law, or the principle of it, to mankind" (T”JS, p. 56).

 

Latter-day scriptures emphasize the pervasive nature of divine law: "[Go“] hath given a law unto all things, by which they move in their times and their seasons" (D”C 88:42). "This“ is the Light of Christ…which light proceedeth forth from the presence of God to fill the immensity of space-The light which is in all things, which giveth life to all things, which is the law by which all things are governed, even the power of God who sitteth upon his throne" (D”C 88:7, 12-13).

 

These same sources suggest, however, that divine law operates within the domain to which it inherently pertains or is assigned by God and, therefore, has limits or bounds: "All” kingdoms have a law given; and there are many kingdoms; for there is no space in which there is no kingdom; and there is no kingdom in which there is no space, either a greater or a lesser kingdom. And unto every kingdom is given a law; and unto every law there are certain bounds also and conditions" (D”C 88:36-38).

 

The above references apparently pertain to descriptive law-that is, the divine law that operates directly upon or through physical and biological orders (see Nature, Law of).

 

Other laws of God are prescriptive. They address the free will of man, setting forth standards and rules of behavior necessary for salvation and for social harmony. Latter-day Saints embrace such prescriptive commands of God as found in the Ten Commandments and the Sermon on the Mount. Latter-day revelation also confirms that blessings and salvation come through compliance with divine laws: "There is a law, irrevocably decreed in heaven before the foundations of this world, upon which all blessings are predicated-and when we obtain any blessing from God, it is by obedience to that law upon which it is predicated" (D”C 130:20-21). "And” they who are not sanctified through the law which I have given unto you, even the law of Christ, must inherit another kingdom, even that of a Terrestrial Kingdom, or that of a Telestial Kingdom" (D”C 88:21).

 

Of these prescriptive laws or commandments of God, LDS teachings tend to emphasize the following characteristics: (1) the extent of the divine laws revealed to mankind may vary from dispensation to dispensation, according to the needs and conditions of mankind as God decrees; (2) they are given through and interpreted by his prophets; (3) they are relatively concise, but "gentle" or” benevolent, given to promote the happiness he has designed for his children (TPJS, pp. 256-57); and (4) they are efficacious for mankind as God's harmony with eternal law was, and is, efficacious for him, and will bring to pass the exaltation of his righteous children.

 

(Encyclopedia of Mormonism, 1-4 vols, edited by Daniel H. Ludlow (New York: Macmillan, 1992), 808.)


(Doctrine and Covenants 88:46-49.)

 

46 Unto what shall I liken these kingdoms, that ye may understand?

 

47 Behold, all these are kingdoms, and any man who hath seen any or the least of these hath seen God moving in his majesty and power.

 

48 I say unto you, he hath seen him; nevertheless, he who came unto his own was not comprehended.

 

49 The light shineth in darkness, and the darkness comprehendeth it not; nevertheless, the day shall come when you shall comprehend even God, being quickened in him and by him.

 

Kingdoms have reference to other worlds Christ has created.  Most people do not comprehend who or what God is.  The day will come when we will comprehend God. 

The ultimate experience will be during the Millennium, when Christ will reign on earth and bring us to God.

You can’t comprehend God in the body we are now in.  We need to be quenched in Him and by Him.  At the end of the endowment (the veil) is where we come into the presence of God.

D&C 88:51-61 – The parable of other kingdoms which Christ visits, that all might be glorified and empowered.

(Doctrine and Covenants 88:62-68.)

 

62 And again, verily I say unto you, my friends, I leave these sayings with you to ponder in your hearts, with this commandment which I give unto you, that ye shall call upon me while I am near—

 

63 Draw near unto me and I will draw near unto you; seek me diligently and ye shall find me; ask, and ye shall receive; knock, and it shall be opened unto you.

 

64 Whatsoever ye ask the Father in my name it shall be given unto you, that is expedient for you;

 

65 And if ye ask anything that is not expedient for you, it shall turn unto your condemnation.

 

66 Behold, that which you hear is as the voice of one crying in the wilderness—in the wilderness, because you cannot see him—my voice, because my voice is Spirit; my Spirit is truth; truth abideth and hath no end; and if it be in you it shall abound.

 

67 And if your eye be single to my glory, your whole bodies shall be filled with light, and there shall be no darkness in you; and that body which is filled with light comprehendeth all things.

 

68 Therefore, sanctify yourselves that your minds become single to God, and the days will come that you shall see him; for he will unveil his face unto you, and it shall be in his own time, and in his own way, and according to his own will.

 

We can draw near unto Christ, but it is in His own time and in His own way (D&C 93:1).  Prayer is our experience by which we can know God and His will concerning us.  Prayer can be answered for our good or our condemnation if we go against the counsel given.

Verse 70 – A solemn assembly was called to receive the law and be empowered from on high (D&C 33).

Verse 74 – We are trying to become clean before the Millennium.

Verse 75 – Fulfill the promise given in verses 3-5.

(Doctrine and Covenants 88:3-5.)

 

3 Wherefore, I now send upon you another Comforter, even upon you my friends, that it may abide in your hearts, even the Holy Spirit of promise; which other Comforter is the same that I promised unto my disciples, as is recorded in the testimony of John.

 

4 This Comforter is the promise which I give unto you of eternal life, even the glory of the celestial kingdom;

 

5 Which glory is that of the church of the Firstborn, even of God, the holiest of all, through Jesus Christ his Son—

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 88:75.)

 

75 That I may testify unto your Father, and your God, and my God, that you are clean from the blood of this wicked generation; that I may fulfil this promise, this great and last promise, which I have made unto you, when I will.

 

Verses 77-80 – Organize a school to learn stated curriculum that they may be prepared in all things.  Missionaries are sent to warn the world of the Second Coming.  They must be educated before they can go out into the world.  You can’t teach what you don’t know.

The School of the Prophets is still going on today with our General Authorities.

Verses 84-85 – If we have been warned, then we need to warn our neighbor.  We are supposed to be educated, to have good jobs and build up the kingdom.  Prepare the people for the Millennium.

D&C 89 was given as part of the Honor Code to the School of the Prophets, later it was given to the whole church (D&C 88:120-136)

Verses 117-119 - Our education is on what God does, not always scriptural, we learn by inspiration, revelation, and work, it just doesn’t happen!  D&C 9:7-9, commanded to build a temple.

One reason for the Honor Code was to become ONE in the name of the Lord.

Uplifted hands = clean hands, pure heart.  They greeted each other in this fashion; it was part of the Honor Code, verses 132-133.

School of the Prophets. Section 88 called for the organization of a school for all of those called to the ministry, for "there instruction in all things" (verse 127). A subsequent revelation detailed the meaning of "all” things" when it directed members of the school to "study and learn, and become acquainted with all good books, and with languages, tongues and people" (D”C 90:15). The school, variously known as the "School of the Prophets," the” "School of the Elders," an” the "school of mine apostles," was” intended to teach doctrine as well as secular topics to the Elders in order to properly "qualify themselves as messengers of Jesus Christ." ”Instruction for the "Elders" was” offered during four winter sessions in Kirtland: January-April 1833, 1834-35, 1835-36, and 1836-37. Evidence also affirms that at least one session of the school was held in Missouri, during the summer of 1833.

 

The 1833 School: Kirtland Phase. On January 23 a small number of men convened to organize the School of the Prophets. The event which predominated the meeting was the washing of feet. Following is an extract from the minutes of the meeting:

 

Opened with Prayer by the President [Joseph Smith] and after much speaking praying and singing, all done in Tongues proceded to washing hands faces feet in the name of the Lord. . .each one washing his own after which the president girded himself with a towel and again washed the feet of all the Elders wiping them with the towel. . . . The President said after he had washed the feet of the Elders, as I have done so do ye wash ye therefore one another’s feet pronouncing at the same time through the power of the Holy Ghost that the Elders were all clean from the blood of this generation but that those among them who should sin willfully after they were thus cleansed and sealed up unto eternal life should be given over unto the buffpracticeSatan until the day of redemption. Having continued all day in fasting & prayer before the Lord at the close they partook of the Lords supper. fn

 

Consisting primarily of high priests, members of the school met regularly for nearly ten weeks (23 January to about 1 April 1833) in Kirtland, Ohio. The school was held in a small (10' x ’4') room in the upper story of Newel K. Whitney's store, at a time when the entire upper level of the store was being used by the Prophet and his wife as a residence. The "school room," as” it was called, had served earlier as a porch but had been enclosed by Levi Hancock, a carpenter, for use by the school. Regulations for the operation of the School of the Prophets were received by revelation and adhered to during the 1833 school season. Although Joseph Smith presided over the school, Orson Hyde was appointed the teacher. The number composing the 1833 school probably never exceeded twenty-five. Known members were: Joseph Smith, Sidney Rigdon, Frederick G. Williams, Joseph Smith, Sr., Hyrum Smith, Samuel H. Smith, William Smith, Ezra Thayer, Newel K. Whitney, Martin Harris, Zebedee Coltrin, John Murdock, Lyman Johnson, Orson Hyde, Solomon Humphrey, Sylvester Smith, Orson Pratt, and Levi Hancock. The salutation recorded in D&C 88:133 was given each time the group came together. The teacher "saluted the brethren [with uplifted hands] as they came in," remembered Zebedee Coltrin, one of the original school, and "the“also answered with uplifted hands." Coltrin also stated, "Before going to school we washed ourselves and put on clean linen." ”Members of school came fasting at sunrise and normally continued until near 4:00 P.M.

 

The Sacrament was "administered at times when Joseph appointed, after the ancient order; that is, warm bread to break easy was provided, and broken into pieces as large as [a] fist and each person had a glass of wine." ”At the conclusion of each meeting, the scholars were dismissed following a prayer with uplifted hands. Although the school was primarily intended for "revelation and doctrine," ti”e was also given for "learning English grammar," an” Sidney Rigdon "lectured on grammar sometimes." fn”

 

Several accounts of spiritual manifestations in the school are available. Zebedee Coltrin; however, is the author of the most dramatic. The following is from Coltrin's account:

 

About the time the school was first organized some wished to see an angel, and a number joined in a circle, and prayed when the vision came, two of the brethren shrank and called for the vision to close or they would perish, they were Bros. Hancock and Humphries.

 

At one of these meetings after the organization of the school, on the 23rd January, 1833, when we were all together, Joseph having given instructions, and while engaged in silent prayer, kneeling, with our hands uplifted each one praying in silence, no one whispered above his breath, a personage walked through the room from East to west, and Joseph asked if we saw him. I saw him and suppose the others did, and Joseph answered that is Jesus, the Son of God, our elder brother. Afterward Joseph told us to resume our former position in prayer, which we did. Another person came through; He was surrounded as with a flame of fire. He (Bro. C[oltrin]) experienced a sensation that it might destroy the tabernacle as it was of consuming fire of great brightness. The Prophet Joseph said this was the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ. I saw Him. . . . This appearance was so grand and overwhelming that it seemed I should melt down in His presence, and the sensation was so powerful that it thrilled through my whole system and I felt it in the marrow of my bones. The Prophet Joseph said: Brethren now you are prepared to be Apostles of Jesus Christ, for you have seen both the Father and the Son. fn

 

 

(Lyndon W. Cook, The Revelations of the Prophet Joseph Smith: A Historical and Biographical Commentary of the Doctrine and Covenants [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1985], 185 - 18–.)

Education was and is a major part of getting people ready for the Millennium

 

D&C 93-97

Discourses of Wilford Woodruff:

AN INTERVIEW WITH BRIGHAM YOUNG I believe the eyes of the heavenly hosts are over this people; I believe they are watching the elders of Israel, the prophets and apostles and men who are called to bear off this kingdom. I believe they watch over us all with great interest…. I have had many interviews with Brother Joseph until the last fifteen or twenty years of my life; I have not seen him for that length of time. But during my travels in the southern country last winter I had many interviews with President Young, and with Heber C. Kimball, and George A. Smith, and Jedediah M. Grant, and many others who are dead. They attended our conference, they attended our meetings. And on one occasion, I saw Brother Brigham and Brother Heber ride in carriage ahead of the carriage in which I rode when I was on my way to attend conference; and they were dressed in the most priestly robes. When we arrived at our destination I asked President Young if he would preach to us. He said, "No,” I have finished my testimony in the flesh. I shall not talk to this people any more." "But“said he, "I have come to see you; I have come to watch over you, and to see what the people are doing." Then, said he, "I want you to teach the people-and I want you to follow this counsel yourself-that they must labor and so live as to obtain the Holy Spirit, for without this you cannot build up the kingdom; without the spirit of God you are in danger of walking in the dark, and in danger of failing to accomplish your calling as apostles and as elders in the church and kingdom of God." An”, said he, "Brother Joseph taught me this principle."

 

And I will here say, I have heard him refer to that while he was living. But what I was going to say is this: the thought came to me that Brother Joseph had left the work of watching over this Church and kingdom to others, and that he had gone ahead, and that he had left this work to men who have lived and labored with us since he left us. This idea manifested itself to me, that such men advance in the spirit world. And I believe myself that these men who have died and gone into the spirit world had this mission left with them; that is, a certain portion of them, to watch over the Latter-day Saints.—JD 21:317-318, October 10, 1880.

 

WHEN MEN ARE CALLED TO THE OTHER SIDE Perhaps I may be permitted to relate a circumstance with which I am acquainted in relation to Bishop Roskelley, of Smithfield, Cache Valley:

 

On one occasion he was suddenly taken very sick-near to death's door. While he lay in this condition, President Peter Maughan, who was dead, came to him and said: "Brother Roskelley, we held a council on the other side of the veil. I have had a great deal to do, and I have the privilege of coming here to appoint one man to come and help. I have had three names given to me in council, and you are one of them. I want to inquire into your circumstances.

 

The Bishop told him what he had to do, and they conversed together as one man would converse with another. President Maughan then said to him: "I think I will not call you. I think you are wanted here more than perhaps one of the others."

 

Bishop Roskelley got well from that hour. Very soon after, the second man was taken sick, but not being able to exercise sufficient faith, Brother Roskelley did not go to him. By and by this man recovered, and on meeting Brother Roskelley, he said: "brother Maughan came to me the other night and told me he was sent to call one man from the ward," an” he named two men as had been done to Brother Roskelley. A few days afterwards the third man was taken sick and died.

 

 Now, I name this to show a principle. They have work on the other side of the veil; and they want men, and they call them. And that was my view in regards to Brother George A. Smith. When he was almost at death's door, Brother Cannon administered to him, and in thirty minutes he was up and ate breakfast with his family. We labored with him in this way, but ultimately, as you know, he died. But it taught me a lesson. I felt that man was wanted behind the veil. We labored also with Brother Pratt; but he, too, was wanted behind the veil.—JD 22:334, October 8, 1881.

 

(Wilford Woodruff, The Discourses of Wilford Woodruff, edited by G. Homer Durham [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1969], 289.)

(Doctrine and Covenants 93:19.)

19 I give unto you these sayings that you may understand and know how to worship, and know what you worship, that you may come unto the Father in my name, and in due time receive of his fulness.

What we worship – Heavenly Father

 

How we Worship – The same way as the Son, follow His example.

 

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 93:23-24.)

 

23 Ye were also in the beginning with the Father; that which is Spirit, even the Spirit of truth;

 

24 And truth is knowledge of things as they are, and as they were, and as they are to come;

 

We were in the beginning with the Father.  Truth is knowledge of things as they are in mortality, that’s why we are here (testing & knowledge).  The pre mortal experience (as they were), the spirit world, millennium and kingdoms after death and judgment (as they are to come)

 

Eternal truths are unchanging, we have always existed and are spirit offspring of God, and thus we have the potential of becoming like God.

 

Ye Were in the Beginning

 

In Section 93 there are two verses that reveal a doctrine that has tremendous meaning for Latter-day Saints and all who desire to receive knowledge that gives meaning to the earth-life. The verses are:

 

Ye were also in the beginning with the Father.

 

Man was also in the beginning with God. . (Verses 23, 29.)

 

In this message about man, including other modern scriptures, an entire vista of information is opened up. It is not the Doctrine and Covenants that gives much information about man's pre-earth life, but the Pearl of Great Price. (Abraham 3:22-23; Moses 3:5.) Upon the basis of the modern scriptures the prophets of this dispensation have provided sufficient about that life to make a clear picture of its principles and implications for the earth-life.

 

Basic to an understanding of the plan of salvation is man's relationship to God. Concerning man, we learn that he is a dual being consisting of a physical body and a spirit entity. The most important truth regarding man's spirit is to be understood as literally having parents in the life before this. The word "begotten" is” to be understood as literally as the begetting of Jesus Christ in the spirit and also in the flesh by our Heavenly Father. Paul the Apostle taught that we are the offspring of God. (Acts 17:27, 28.) Old Testament prophets referred to the relationship of man and God by saying he is "the “God of the spirits of all flesh." (Numbers 16:22; 27:16.) The writer of Hebrews speaks of the "Father of Spirits." (Heb. 12:9.)

 

The importance of the doctrine of the Fatherhood of God is known in many ways: (1) the highest measure of salvation, exaltation or godhood, is possible because of the divine birth that man received as the Father's child—the child may attain the heights of the Father; (2) the concern for the well-being of the child by earthly parents is many times magnified with our Heavenly Father; (3) greater meaning is attached to prayer and the assurance of its being answered; (4) security is found in knowing that whatever happens in life, there is meaning in those events.

 

Man's Creation

 

Man's origin is clarified by the First Presidency composed of Joseph F. Smith, John R. Winder, and Anthon H. Lund:

 

Adam, our great progenitor "the” first man" was”, like Christ, a pre-existent spirit, and like Christ he took upon him an appropriate body, the body of a man, and so became a "living soul." The” doctrine of pre-existence—revealed so plainly, particularly in the latter days, pours a wonderful flood of light upon the otherwise mysterious problem of man's origin. It shows that man, as a spirit, was begotten and born of heavenly parents, and reared to maturity in the eternal mansions of the Father, prior to coming upon the earth in a temporal body to undergo an experience in mortality. It teaches that all men existed in the spirit before any man existed in the flesh, and that all who have inhabited the earth since Adam have taken bodies and become souls in like manner . . . The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, basing its belief on divine revelation, ancient and modern, proclaims man to be the direct and lineal offspring of Deity. ("The “Origin of Man," Improvement Era, XIII, pp. 75-81.)

 

Man's Spirit

 

The spirit of man is in the form of his earthly body. In an explanation concerning a passage of scripture, the Lord revealed to the Prophet that "the” spirit of man [is] in the likeness of his person." (D”C 77:2.) This divine truth, stated catapracticelwould be understood to mean that certain disfigurements of the flesh in mortality would not be inherited from the shape of the spirit. The fact that the body conforms to the pre-existent spirit is also made known in the Book of Mormon. In a wonderful revelation to the brother of Jared, whose faith permitted him to behold the pre-existent Jesus Christ, the Son of God said:

 

Behold, I am he who was prepared from the foundation of the world to redeem my people. Behold, I am Jesus Christ—Seest thou that ye are created after mine own image? Yea, even all men were created in the beginning after mine own image. Behold, this body, which ye now behold, is the body of my spirit; and man have I created after the body of my spirit; and even as I appear unto thee to be in the spirit will I appear unto my people in the flesh. (Ether 3:14-16.)

 

Man Is Eternal

 

We have learned that man was in the beginning with God. Latter-day Saint theology teaches, however, that man is eternal. If there was a beginning to man as a spirit, and man is eternal, without beginning or end, then, how is this possible? As to form, spirit, man had a beginning, but not as to conscious existence. The Prophet Joseph Smith taught, in this manner, the wonderful truth that man is eternal:

 

I have another subject to dwell upon, which is calculated to exalt man . . . the soul—the mind of man—the mortal spirit. Where did it come from? All learned men and doctors of divinity say that God created it in the beginning; but it is not so; the very idea lessens man in my estimation. I do not believe the doctrine; I know better. Hear it, all ye ends of the world; for God has told me so; and if you don't believe me it will not make the truth without effect . . . We say that God himself is a self-existent being . . . Man does exist upon the same principles . . . The mind or the intelligence which man possesses is co-equal [co-eternal] with God himself . . . I am dwelling on the immortality of the spirit of man. Is it logical to say that the intelligence of spirits is immortal, had no beginning, neither will it have an end. There never was a time when there were not spirits; for they are co-equal [co-eternal] with our Father in Heaven. (DHC 6:310.)

 

From what source did the Prophet receive his information on the eternal nature of man? From the same source—revelation—that Abraham received the following:

 

. . . there is nothing that the Lord thy God shall take in his heart to do but what he will do it. Howbeit that he made the greater star; as, also if there be two spirits and one shall be more intelligent than the other, yet these two spirits, notwithstanding one is more intelligent than the other, have no beginning; they existed before, they shall have no end, they shall exist after for they are gnolaum, or eternal. (Abraham 3:17-18.)

 

Section 93 points out that:

 

Intelligence, or the light of truth, was not created or made; neither indeed can be . . . For man is spirit. The elements are eternal, and spirit and element, inseparably connected, receive a fulness of joy; and when separated, man cannot receive a fulness of joy. (Verses 29, 33, 34.)

 

These passages suggest the same idea expressed by the Prophet when he used the expression, "the “intelligence of spirits" in “the above quotation—the spirit of man consists of intelligence, the uncreatable substance. Eternal matter—spirit—combined with intelligence constitutes the eternal man.

 

President Joseph Fielding Smith of the Council of the Twelve once wrote this observation concerning intelligence and spirit:

 

Some of our writers have endeavored to explain what an intelligence is, but to do so is futile, for we have never been given any insight into this matter beyond what the Lord has fragmentarily revealed. We know, however, that there is something called intelligence which always existed. It is the real eternal part of man, which was not created or made. This intelligence combined with the spirit constitutes a spiritual identity or individual. The spirit of man, then is a combination of the intelligence and the spirit which is an entity begotten of God. (The Progress of Man, p. 11.)

 

 

(Roy W. Doxey, The Doctrine and Covenants Speaks [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1964], 2: 190.)

 

 

Our spirit and physical body descended from God, and we are direct and lineal offspring of Deity “Origin of Man” on website.

 

Moses 6:22 – We need an actual knowledge of our descent; we also have divine potential by our birth.

 

Man, The Offspring of God

Lorenzo Snow
    Our spirit birth gave us godlike capabilities. We were born in the image of God our Father; He begot us like unto Himself. There is the nature of deity in the composition of our spiritual organization; in our spiritual birth our Father transmitted to us the capabilities, powers and faculties which He Himself possessed -- a–much so as the child on its mother's bosom possesses, although in an undeveloped state, the faculties, powers, and susceptibilities of its parent. [Teachings of Lorenzo Snow, p.4]

First Presidency Message: Joseph F. Smith, John R. Winder, Anthon H. Lund
    Man is the child of God, formed in the divine image and endowed with divine attributes, and even as the infant son of an earthly father and mother is capable in due time of becoming a man, so the undeveloped offspring of celestial parentage is capable, by experience through ages and aeons, of evolving into a God. [Messages of the First Presidency, 4:206]

Joseph Fielding Smith
    We believe in the dignity and divine origin of man. Our faith is founded on the fact that God is our Father, and that we are his children, and that all men are brothers and sisters in the same eternal family.
    As members of his family, we dwelt with him before the foundations of this earth were laid, and he ordained and established the plan of salvation whereby we gained the privilege of advancing and progressing as we are endeavoring to do.
    The God we worship is a glorified Being in whom all power and perfection dwell, and he has created man in his own image and likeness, with those characteristics and attributes which he himself possesses. [Conference Report, April 1970, p.4]

The Origin and Destiny of Man

(D&C 93)

 

LAMAR E. GARRARD

 

What is man? Where did he come from? Why is he here on earth? Where is he going? These basic but simple questions have been asked for centuries by philosophers, theologians, and even the common man. How important these questions—and their answers—are to the Latter-day Saints was emphasized by Joseph Smith when he said:

 

All men know that they must die. And it is important that we should understand the reasons and causes of our exposure to the vicissitudes of life and death, and the designs and purposes of God in our coming into the world, our sufferings here, and our departure hence. What is the object of our coming into existence, then dying and falling away, to be here no more? It is but reasonable to suppose that God would reveal something in reference to the matter, and it is a subject we ought to study more than any other. We ought to study it day and night, for the world is ignorant in reference to their true condition and relation. If we have any claim on our Heavenly Father for anything, it is for knowledge on this important subject. fn

 

In The Beginning With The Father

 

One of the great revelations which teach us about the origin and destiny of man is section 93 of the Doctrine and Covenants. By studying this section along with other scriptures and the teachings of Joseph Smith related to this subject, we can follow the admonition of Joseph Smith and consequently gain an understanding of the origin and destiny of man.

 

This great revelation teaches us about ourselves by first teaching us about Christ and then showing us what our relationship is to him. It states that Christ was "in the beginning with the Father" and was "the Firstborn" (D&C 93:21). This statement could not refer to Christ's birth here upon this earth wherein he took upon himself a body of flesh and blood, since in this case he was the Only Begotten of the Father. Rather, it would have to refer to his "beginning" in a premortal state as the firstborn child among a family of spirit children of God the Father. That all men were part of this family of spirit children becomes apparent, for the revelation further states that "ye were also in the beginning with the Father; that which is Spirit, even the Spirit of truth" (D&C 93:23); another verse adds that "man was also in the beginning with God" (D&C 93:29). No doubt this "beginning" refers to our spirit birth, since we are further told that the inhabitants of the world are "begotten sons and daughters unto God" (see D&C 76:24). fn Furthermore, in his writings Joseph Smith referred to God as the "Father of our spirits," fn "our Great Parent," fn and "our Father." fn Modern revelation agrees consistently with references made by Paul in the New Testament on this subject wherein he states: we are "the offspring of God" (Acts 17:28, 29), God the Father is "the Father of spirits" (Heb. 12:9), Christ is "the firstborn of every creature" (Col. 1:15; see also Rev. 3:14), and men are referred to as Christ's "brethren" (see Heb. 2:11-12, 17).

 

Just what a premortal spirit looks like is revealed to us by an incident wherein a Jaredite prophet (the brother of Jared) was allowed to view the premortal spirit of Christ and was surprised to find out that his (Christ's) spirit resembled a body of flesh and blood (Ether 3:6-20). In fact, the brother of Jared assumed he was looking at a fleshy body until he was corrected by the Savior, who told him that he was not looking at his physical body but rather at his spirit, since he (Christ) had not yet been born upon the earth.

 

Seest thou that ye are created after mine own image? Yea, even all men were created in the beginning after mine own image.

 

Behold, this body, which ye now behold, is the body of my spirit; and man have I created after the body of my spirit; and even as I appear unto thee to be in the spirit will I appear unto my people in the flesh (Ether 3:15-16, italics added).

 

In this scripture, the Lord refers to two creations of man: in the second verse it is the physical creation of Adam (man), but in the first verse it is the spirit creation of all men in the beginning. fn This reference to spirit birth as a "creation" is consistent with a scripture which states that God "created all the children of men" before man was upon the earth to till the ground, "for in heaven created I them" (Moses 3:5, italics added). The Lord further stated that he "made the world, and men before they were in the flesh" (Moses 6:51, italics added). These modern revelations indicate, then, that the "beginning" of man occurred in premortality—in heaven—where we were all "begotten" as spirits, or in other words "created" or "made" in the image of our immortal, resurrected, and exalted parents. fn

 

God designed or planned that the spirit body and physical body of man be made in his image, fn and it is through his great creative powers that we were born or created as spirits as well as mortal beings. Our indebtedness to God for our spirits and mortal bodies was emphasized by King Benjamin when he said:

 

O how you ought to thank your heavenly King.

 

I say unto you, my brethren, that if you should render all the thanks and praise which your whole soul has power to possess, to that God who has created you, and has kept and preserved you . . .

 

I say unto you that if ye should serve him who has created you from the beginning, and is preserving you from day to day, by lending you breath, that ye may live and move and do according to your own will, and even supporting you from one moment to another—I say, if ye should serve him with all your whole souls yet ye would be unprofitable servants (Mosiah 2:19-21, italics added).

 

Some have proposed that Joseph Smith taught that the spirit of man was not created but rather has always self-existed. This misunderstanding seems to have arisen as a result of the various meanings associated with the word "create."

 

In the days of Joseph Smith many theologians believed God created the earth ex nihilo, or out of nothing. Joseph Smith refuted that belief and said that the word "create" means to "organize," and that the world was organized by God out of existing element or physical matter which was eternal. Even though the earth had a "beginning" when it was organized, it is still eternal or uncreated in the sense that the elements from which it was organized are eternal and uncreated.

 

Now, the word create came from the word baurau which does not mean to create out of nothing; it means to organize; the same as a man would organize materials and build a ship. Hence, we infer that God had materials to organize the world out of chaos—chaotic matter, which is element, and in which dwells all the glory. Element had an existence from the time he had. The pure principles of element are principles which can never be destroyed; they may be organized and re-organized, but not destroyed. They had no beginning, and can have no end. fn

 

The Doctrine and Covenants teaches that after the earth was created or organized it later fell to a telestial state. In the future it will be changed to a terrestrial state, then die and be resurrected to a celestial state where it will continue throughout eternity as an eternal or immortal home for the righteous. fn

 

Similarly, the physical or mortal body of man has "beginning" when it is created or organized in the mother's womb. However, the physical body is also eternal or uncreated in the sense that the elements from which it was organized are eternal and uncreated. Even though the body will undergo a change (reorganization of the elements) at death and again in the resurrection, afterwards it will still continue to exist throughout eternity as an eternal and immortal body (D&C 93:33; cf. Alma 11:45).

 

In like manner, the spirit of man had a beginning when it was created (begotten) or organized in heaven. Like the earth and our physical bodies, it is also "eternal" with "no beginning" and "no end" in the sense of being organized from "eternal" spirit matter which had "no beginning" and can have "no end." fn Evidently Joseph Smith was merely refuting the idea that the spirit was created out of nothing when he said that "the spirit of man is not a created being; it existed from eternity, and will exist to eternity. Anything created cannot be eternal; and earth, water, etc., had their existence in an elementary state, from eternity." fn

 

Joseph Smith further explained that this spirit was not immaterial, as some had advocated in his day, but rather was organized from a substance or matter which was quite different from physical matter.

 

In tracing the thing to the foundation, and looking at it philosophically, we shall find a very material difference between the body and the spirit; the body is supposed to be organized matter, and the spirit, by many, is thought to be immaterial, without substance. With this latter statement we should beg leave to differ, and state the spirit is a substance; that it is material, but that it is more pure, elastic and refined matter than the body; that it existed before the body, can exist in the body; and will exist separate from the body, when the body will be mouldering in the dust; and will in the resurrection, be again united with it. fn

 

Grace for Grace

 

So we see that section 93 teaches us that mortal man is a dual being composed of a spirit (an offspring of God) which is clothed in a physical body composed of eternal elements. God's great design or plan is to make men happy; as Joseph Smith said, "Happiness is the object and design of our existence." fn Evidently, gaining a spirit body gives a person a certain amount of happiness (see Job 38:4-7); and gaining a physical body or tabernacle to house that spirit brings still more happiness, for "the great principle of happiness consists in having a body." fn Man is restricted in his happiness without a physical body, fn and can only receive a fulness of happiness or joy after the resurrection when the spirit and the physical body are inseparably connected.

 

For man is spirit. The elements are eternal, and spirit and element, inseparably connected, receive a fulness of joy;

 

And when separated, man cannot receive a fulness of joy.

 

The elements are the tabernacle of God; yea, man is the tabernacle of God, even temples; and whatsoever temple is defiled, God shall destroy that temple (D&C 93:33-35).

 

Gaining an immortal body in the resurrection is necessary but not sufficient to gain a fulness of joy. Evidently, to gain a fulness of light and truth is the other necessary requirement for gaining a fulness of joy. John tells us that when Christ came on earth to dwell in the flesh, he did not have a fulness of light and truth. fn He received, however, additional light and truth as he continually obeyed his Father, even though he was subjected to severe opposition in terms of trials and temptations. fn

 

And I, John, bear record that I beheld . . . the Only Begotten of the Father . . . which came and dwelt in the flesh, and dwelt among us.

 

And I, John, saw that he received not of the fulness at the first, but received grace for grace;

 

And he received not of the fulness at first, but continued from grace to grace, until he received a fulness;

 

And thus he was called the Son of God, because he received not of the fulness at the first (D&C 93:11-14).

 

John tells us further that after Christ's resurrection when he received all power in heaven and earth, he also received a fulness of the glory of the Father, which is a fulness of light and truth: fn "And I, John, bear record that he received a fulness of the glory of the Father; And he received all power, both in heaven and on earth, and the glory of the Father was with him, for he dwelt in him" (D&C 93:16-17; cf. Matt. 28:18).

 

At that time, as a glorified, perfected, immortal being, Christ experienced a fulness of joy. fn Not only did Christ receive a fulness of joy, but section 93 reveals to us that men can also attain this great goal if they obey his commandments as he obeyed his Father, while suffering severe trials and temptations. fn

 

The Spirit of truth is of God. I am the Spirit of truth, and John bore record of me, saying: He received a fulness of truth, yea, even of all truth;

 

And no man receiveth a fulness unless he keepeth his commandments.

 

He that keepeth his commandments receiveth truth and light, until he is glorified in truth and knoweth all things (D&C 93:26-28).

 

How is it possible that men can achieve a fulness of light and truth and consequently a fulness of joy? Again, section 93 reminds us that in premortality we sprang from the same source as did Christ. We are also a Spirit of truth or spirit child of God the Father as was Christ: "And now, verily I say unto you, I was in the beginning with the Father, and am the Firstborn. . . . Ye were also in the beginning with the Father; that which is Spirit, even the Spirit of truth" (D&C 93:21, 23).

 

Once organized or "created," the premortal spirit of man or "Spirit of truth" seems to have inherited from its eternal parents the ability to receive light and truth sent to it by God. The word of God "is truth, and whatsoever is truth is light" (D&C 84:45), and when the spirit of man hearkens to and obeys God by accepting this light and truth, he is enlightened and receives more light. fn When the spirit of man refuses to accept this light and truth, or in other words disobeys God, he not only loses the light he could have received but may also lose the light already accumulated from prior obedience. fn That the spirit of man may not have had the ability to be enlightened prior to its organization seems to be implied in the following statement made by Joseph Smith: "We consider that God has created man with a mind capable of instruction, and a faculty which may be enlarged in proportion to the heed and diligence given to the light communicated from heaven to the intellect; and that the nearer man approaches perfection, the clearer are his views, and the greater his enjoyments." fn

 

Also, section 93 states that after its "beginning" or organization, the spirit was "innocent" (D&C 93:38). This is no doubt because prior to its organization it had the potential but not the ability to receive light from God. Hence, when there is "no law" given, there is "no sin" (2 Ne. 2:13; Alma 42:17-20).

 

Modern revelation seems to indicate that two things make it possible for the spirit of man to have the ability to receive or reject light and truth from God: first, the innate, uncreated, and eternal nature of spirit matter itself called "intelligence"; second, the creative and organizing power of God. If God were totally responsible for creating the spirit itself (i.e., responsible for bringing it into existence), then he would be responsible for the basic nature of the spirit, whether it prefers to obey or disobey him. Then it would seem unreasonable and unjust for God to condemn the spirit for disobeying him when he was responsible for the spirit's basic preferences.

 

Section 93 seems to indicate that the intelligence of spirits (referred to in the parenthetical phrase as "uncreated") is such that after its beginning with the Father (where it was organized or "created" by the power of God and became a "Spirit of truth," or "truth") where it was placed in the proper sphere and given agency by God, fn it could then act independently and therefore be accountable for the choices it makes.

 

Man was also in the beginning with God. Intelligence, or the light of truth, was not created or made, neither indeed can be.

 

All truth is independent in that sphere in which God has placed it, to act for itself, as all intelligence also; otherwise there is no existence.

 

Behold, here is the agency of man, and here is the condemnation of man; because that which was from the beginning is plainly manifest unto them, and they receive not the light.

 

And every man whose spirit receiveth not the light is under condemnation.

 

For man is spirit (D&C 93:29-33, italics added).

 

As the newly-organized spirit of man obeys the laws of God, it gains more light and truth, or knowledge, and advances toward Godhood. fn

 

The first principles of man are self-existent with God. God himself, finding he was in the midst of spirits and glory, because he was more intelligent, saw proper to institute laws whereby the rest could have the privilege to advance like himself. The relationship we have with God places us in a situation to advance in knowledge. He has the power to institute laws to instruct the weaker intelligences, that they may be exalted with himself, so that they might have one glory upon another, and all that knowledge, power, glory, and intelligence, which is requisite in order to save them in the world of spirits. fn

 

As mentioned previously, God organized man with one object in mind: to make men happy. In his infinite wisdom and knowledge he knows which pathway is best for us to follow to make us happy. As we obey his commandments or laws (light and truth) he reveals additional commandments which if obeyed, will bring us closer to a fulness of light and truth. fn

 

Happiness is the object and design of our existence; and will be the end thereof, if we pursue the path that leads to it; and this path is virtue, uprightness, faithfulness, holiness, and keeping all the commandments of God. But we cannot keep all the commandments without first knowing them, and we cannot expect to know all, or more than we now know unless we comply with or keep those we have already received. . . .

 

In obedience there is joy and peace unspotted, unalloyed; and as God has designed our happiness—and the happiness of all His creatures, he never has—He never will institute an ordinance or give a commandment to His people that is not calculated in its nature to promote that happiness which He has designed, and which will not end in the greatest amount of good and glory to those who become the recipients of his law and ordinances. fn

 

Section 93 reveals to us that "the glory of God is intelligence, or, in other words, light and truth" (D&C 93:36). This indicates that "intelligence" has reference not only to the basic uncreated nature of the spirit, but also to how much light and truth a spirit has accumulated because of its obedience up to that point. John was allowed to see the glory or "intelligence" attained by Christ before this world was organized (D&C 93:7; cf. John 17:5). In another vision Abraham was allowed to see the glory or "intelligence" attained by Christ as well as other premortal spirits at a time when a council was being held to plan the creation of this earth. Just as stars differ from each other in brightness, he saw that some spirits had more glory or were more "intelligent" than others because of their obedience; Christ had gained so much light and truth that he was more intelligent than they all. In fact, Christ had become so intelligent by his obedience that his wisdom excelled above them all, and God chose him to be the Lord God of this earth to rule over all the other spirits or "organized intelligences" (see Abr. 3:19-22). Having gained so much light and truth in premortality, Christ became a source of light and truth (the fountain of all righteousness) for his spirit brothers and sisters. fn As we listened to him, obeyed him, and became acquainted with his voice, we advanced also in light and truth. fn Some of the more obedient or noble spirits were chosen to be rulers in mortality (see Abr. 3:22-23; cf. Jer. 1:5). Evidently, the intelligence or amount of light and truth we acquired in premortality affects our tendency to accept light and truth in mortality. fn Even though we have a fallen mortal body subject to the power or temptations of Satan in this life, fn to house our spirits (D&C 93:35; cf. 1 Cor. 3:16-17), our spirit (a child of God) can still choose to receive light and truth fn and obey God. As the spirit accumulates more light and truth it gains the spiritual power to resist and overcome the temptations and trials associated with the fallen body and environment, fn which are all a part of this fallen mortal world. fn In other words, as we obey Christ's voice, which comes to us through his Spirit, the redemptive power of the atonement makes it possible for us to overcome the spiritual death which resulted from the fall of man. fn That is, we are led to the gospel of Jesus Christ (D&C 84:43-48), and if we are obedient and accept it, we will receive the Holy Ghost, and through the redemptive power of Christ we can continue to feast upon the words of Christ and receive additional light and truth. fn This process of obeying, receiving light and truth, then further obeying that which was revealed to us (going from grace to grace) will continue until sometime after the resurrection when we will receive a fulness of light and truth, becoming like Christ himself, possessing a fulness of the glory of the Father. fn

 

And I, John, bear record that he received a fulness of the glory of the Father;

 

And he received all power, both in heaven and on earth, and the glory of the Father was with him, for he dwelt in him. . . .

 

I give unto you these sayings that you may understand and know how to worship, and know what you worship, that you may come unto the Father in my name, and in due time receive of his fulness.

 

For if you keep my commandments you shall receive of his fulness, and be glorified in me as I am in the Father; therefore, I say unto you, you shall receive grace for grace. . . .

 

He that keepeth his commandments receiveth truth and light, until he is glorified in truth and knoweth all things (D&C 93:16-17, 19-20, 28).

 

Worship consists largely in the imitation of the Master. fn Hence, by knowing what Christ was, what he is now and how he obtained his present position, we can worship God, follow Christ's example, and eventually become a joint heir with him to share eternal life and a fulness of light and truth forever. fn

 

Notes The Origin and Destiny of Man

 

1. TPJS, p. 324.

 

2. That this is referring to literal spirit birth and not spiritual rebirth is evidenced by the fact that the inhabitants of the world do not all eventually go through this spiritual rebirth. Also, in many passages of the Doctrine and Covenants, God is referred to as "our" Father as well as the Father of spirits. See D&C 84:83, 92; 88:75; 89:5; 123:6.

 

3. TPJS, p. 48.

 

4. Ibid., p. 55.

 

5. Ibid., pp. 56, 353.

 

6. Since both creations were made in the image of God, the spirit of man and his physical body should be in the likeness of each other. This agrees with the revelation which states that the "spirit of man" is "in the likeness of his person" (D&C 77:2).

 

7. The scriptures state and Joseph Smith taught that exalted persons are capable of having seed eternally (see D&C 131:4; 132:19-20; TPJS, pp. 300-1).

 

8. See Ether 3:15-16; Moses 2:26-27; Abr. 4:26-27; D&C 77:2.

 

9. TPJS, pp. 350-52, italics added. Note how the phrases "have no beginning" and "have no end" are similarly used in Abraham 3:18.

 

10. D&C 29:22-24; 101:23-25; 88:19-20, 25-26; cf. Rev. 21:1-5.

 

11. See D&C 93:29, where the parenthetical phrase "Intelligence, or the light of truth, was not created or made, neither indeed can be," was probably inserted to remind us that the elementary spirit matter or "intelligence" is eternal and uncreated even though the spirit itself had a beginning with God in heaven.

 

Abr. 3:18 is sometimes used to support the view that the spirits of men never had a beginning and are self-existent. This passage refers to the spirits of men as having "no beginning; they existed before, they shall have no end, they shall exist after, for they are gnolaum, or eternal." Verse 22 in this same context, however, speaks of these spirits as "organized intelligences." Evidently, it is the spirit matter or intelligence that has "no beginning," and can have "no end" for the spirit body or "organized intelligence" definitely had a beginning when it was organized or begotten in heaven. Elder Bruce R. McConkie emphasized this when he said: "Abraham used the name intelligences to apply to the spirit children of the Eternal Father. The intelligence or spirit element became intelligences after the spirits were born as individual entities" (Mormon Doctrine, 2nd ed. [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1966], p. 387).

 

Besides Abraham 3:18, statements by Joseph Smith have also been used to propose the idea that spirits are self-existent and were never created (see TPJS, pp. 352-54). However, these statements must be taken in context with other statements by Joseph Smith, such as those where he states that it is the "intelligence of spirit" that had no beginning or end and "the mind or intelligence which man possesses is co-equal with God" (TPJS, p. 353).

 

12. TPJS, p.158.

 

13. Ibid., p. 207; cf. D&C 131:7-8.

 

14. Ibid., p. 255.

 

15. Ibid., p. 181.

 

16. Ibid., p. 181; D&C 45:17, 6; cf. Abr. 3:26; Moses 1:39.

 

17. The John bearing his testimony here is John the Baptist. See Bruce R. McConkie, Doctrinal New Testament Commentary, 3 vols. (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1965), 1:70-71; Sidney B. Sperry, Doctrine and Covenants Compendium (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1960), pp. 472-73.

 

18. Mosiah 3:7-11; 15:1-9; Heb. 2:9-11, 14-18; 4:14-16; 5:7-9.

 

19. "The glory of God is intelligence, or in other words, light and truth" (D&C 93:36). See also D&C 93:6, 26.

 

20. After his resurrection when he was perfected (Matt. 5:48; cf. 3 Ne. 12:48), the Savior appeared to his Nephite Twelve and told them that his Father had given him a fulness of joy (3 Ne. 28:10; cf. 3 Ne. 17:20). Christ endured much suffering, temptations, and shame, including death on the cross, "for the joy that was set before him" (Heb. 12:2; cf. 1 Pet. 1:11).

 

21. While ministering to the Nephites as a perfected being, Christ promised his Nephite Twelve a future fulness of joy in the kingdom of his Father (3 Ne. 28:10). Man is that he might have joy (2 Ne. 2:25), but that fulness of joy is not to be found in this world (D&C 101:35-38), for we sometimes have to suffer as Christ did (Rom. 8:16-18; 1 Pet. 1:6-7; 2:20-25; 3:17-20; 4:1, 12-18; 5:8-11; Rev. 7:14; D&C 58:1-5; 98:3, 12-15; 101:35-38; 121:7-10; 122:7-9; 123:12-17; 136:30-31; 138:12-14). Eventually, however, we will receive eternal joy for our suffering (D&C 109:76). Those who resist temptation, and endure trials and sufferings while remaining faithful stewards, shall eventually inherit eternal life and "shall enter into the joy of the Lord" (D&C 51:19). Joseph Smith summarized this by saying that "those who have died in Jesus Christ may expect to enter into all the fruitions of joy when they come forth, which they possessed or anticipated here" (TPJS, p. 295).

 

22. D&C 50:24, 34-35, 40-44; 63:23; 84:43-48; 88:11-13, 66-67; 2 Ne. 31:18-32:5; Alma 12:9-10; 32:27-37, 41-43; TPJS, pp. 297-98, 305.

 

23. D&C 1:33; 93:39; Alma 12:10-11, 13; 32:38-40; TPJS, p. 217. Cf. D&C 10:21; 29:44-45; 45:28-29; 50:25; 57:10; 82:24; 84:49-53; 93:39-40; 95:6, 12; John 3:16-21.

 

24. TPJS, p. 51.

 

25. The scriptures indicate that agency comes to us as a gift from God (Moses 4:3-4; D&C 29:36-39; 101:78; 2 Ne. 2:16. Because of God's power, men can choose which way to act according to their own desires (Alma 29:4-5), but they will be held accountable for that choice (Alma 3:26-27; cf. TPJS, p. 187. In mortality, there would have been no agency if there had been no atonement provided (2 Ne. 9:5-9; cf. 2 Ne. 2:26-27; 10:23-24; Mosiah 2:21).

 

26. There are some who have proposed that we existed as individual entities capable of thinking and acting before our spirit birth. However, the scriptures do not seem to warrant such an assumption; the creative and organizing power of God was necessary in order to produce the spirit which could act for itself and be responsible for those actions. Even after spirit birth, the power of God is necessary for us to have free agency and continue to act and be acted upon. See 2 Ne. 2:13-14; Mosiah 2:19-21, 23-25.

 

27. TPJS, p. 354.

 

28. D&C 50:24, 40-44; 63:23; 88:66-67; 2 Ne. 31:20; Alma 12:10; 32:41; John 4:14; TPJS, pp. 51, 297-98, 346-48.

 

29. TPJS, pp. 255-57. C.S. Lewis has said much the same thing: "God made us: invented us as a man invents an engine. A car is made to run on petrol, and it won't run properly on anything else. Now God designed the human machine to run on Himself. He Himself is the fuel our spirits were designed to burn, or the food our spirits were designed to feed on, there isn't any other. That's why it's just no good asking God to make us happy in our own way without bothering about religion. God can't give us a happiness and peace apart from Himself, because it isn't there. There's no such thing" (The Case for Christianity [New York City: MacMillan, 1948], p. 43).

 

30. Ether 8:26; 12:28. Abinadi refers to Christ as "the light and life of the world; yea, a light that is endless, that can never be darkened" (Mosiah 16:9; see also D&C 6:21; 11:10-14, 28; 3 Ne. 18:16, 24).

 

31. In the Joseph Smith Translation, John tells us (John 1:1) that in the beginning before the world was, the gospel was preached through the Son who had become God. See Bruce R. McConkie, Doctrinal New Testament Commentary, 1:70-71.

 

32. Those who listened to Christ's voice in premortality tend to listen to it in mortality. See John 10:14, 27-29; cf. D&C 84:52; 50:40-44. See also Joseph F. Smith, Gospel Doctrine (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1971), pp. 12-14.

 

33. D&C 29:39-40; 2 Ne. 2:29; 4:17-19, 27; 10:24; 3 Ne. 28:37-39; Rom. 8:1-13; Gal. 5:16-18.

 

34. TPJS, p. 355; 2 Ne. 2:26-29; 10:23-24; Alma 3:26-27.

 

35. Joseph Smith explained that if we listened to God's voice and obeyed, Satan would have no power over us (TPJS, pp. 181, 187; cf. Moses 4:4).

 

36. Even though we inherit fallen bodies (Ether 3:2) and are born into a wicked world where we are subject To good and evil (Moses 6:55-56), if we call upon God for help and then obey his voice, he will give us the power to overcome all evil (D&C 50:24, 34-35; Rom. 8:12-14; TPJS, p. 51; Alma 13:28). Christ was subject to all the temptations known to man (Heb. 2:16-18; 4:15; 5:8-9), but he never yielded to temptation because his spirit listened to the voice of the Father and hence ruled over his flesh so that the "will of the Son" was "swallowed up in the will of the Father" (Mosiah 15:1-7).

 

37. D&C 29:40-44; Moses 5:9; 6:59-60, 64-65; cf. Mosiah 3:19; Ether 3:2.

 

38. 2 Ne. 31:17-32:5; cf. John 4:7-15; 6:32-35, 48-63; 7:37-39; 8:12.

 

39. D&C 50:24, 34-35, 40-44; 88:66-67; TPJS pp. 346-48, 354.

 

40. 2 Ne. 31:9-10, 12-13, 16-17; TPJS pp. 347-48.

 

41. Rom. 8:14-18; Gal. 4:4-7; D&C 35:2; 50:24, 40-43; 76:56-70; 84:38; 88:49-50, 66-67, 107; 93:20, 26-28; 132:19-21.

 

 (Robert L. Millet and Kent P. Jackson, eds., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 1: The Doctrine and Covenants [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1989], 365.)

Doctrine and Covenants 88:6-13 – The Light of Christ

 

6 He that ascended up on high, as also he descended below all things, in that he comprehended all things, that he might be in all and through all things, the light of truth;

 

7 Which truth shineth. This is the light of Christ. As also he is in the sun, and the light of the sun, and the power thereof by which it was made.

 

8 As also he is in the moon, and is the light of the moon, and the power thereof by which it was made;

 

9 As also the light of the stars, and the power thereof by which they were made;

 

10 And the earth also, and the power thereof, even the earth upon which you stand.

 

11 And the light which shineth, which giveth you light, is through him who enlighteneth your eyes, which is the same light that quickeneth your understandings;

 

12 Which light proceedeth forth from the presence of God to fill the immensity of space—

 

13 The light which is in all things, which giveth life to all things, which is the law by which all things are governed, even the power of God who sitteth upon his throne, who is in the bosom of eternity, who is in the midst of all things.

 

Light of Christ = Glory >> Law >> Life >> Light >> Power >> Truth

 

Christ learned to control this, not all at once but over time He received the fulness, grace for grace.

 

Grace = Enabling power to act, (learn one principle, then move to the next and so forth)

 

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 93:9-17.)

 

9 The light and the Redeemer of the world; the Spirit of truth, who came into the world, because the world was made by him, and in him was the life of men and the light of men.

 

10 The worlds were made by him; men were made by him; all things were made by him, and through him, and of him.

 

11 And I, John, bear record that I beheld his glory, as the glory of the Only Begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth, even the Spirit of truth, which came and dwelt in the flesh, and dwelt among us.

 

12 And I, John, saw that he received not of the fulness at the first, but received grace for grace;

 

13 And he received not of the fulness at first, but continued from grace to grace, until he received a fulness;

 

14 And thus he was called the Son of God, because he received not of the fulness at the first.

 

15 And I, John, bear record, and lo, the heavens were opened, and the Holy Ghost descended upon him in the form of a dove, and sat upon him, and there came a voice out of heaven saying: This is my beloved Son.

 

16 And I, John, bear record that he received a fulness of the glory of the Father;

 

17 And he received all power, both in heaven and on earth, and the glory of the Father was with him, for he dwelt in him.

 

3 phases of the fulness of the Light of Christ

 

  1. General Population, beginning of faith in Christ
  2. Gift of the Holy Ghost administers this aspect – 1st Comforter, ordinances of baptism & GHG
  3.  2nd Comforter – Calling and Election made sure by Christ Himself, further ordinances and covenants are given.  The fulness is given, faith that created worlds.
  4. The power of God, the fulness is controlled by God.

 

The Light of Christ

Bruce R. McConkie

A New Witness for the Articles of Faith, pp. 257-258

There is a spirit -- t– Spirit of the Lord, the Spirit of Christ, the light of truth, the light of Christ -- t–t defies description and is beyond mortal comprehension. It is in us and in all things; it is around us and around all things; it fills the earth and the heavens and the universe. It is everywhere, in all immensity, without exception; it is an indwelling, immanent, ever-present, never-absent spirit. It has neither shape nor form nor personality. It is not an entity nor a person nor a personage. It has no agency, does not act independently, and exists not to act but to be acted upon. As far as we know, it has no substance and is not material, at least as we measure these things. It is variously described as light and life and law and truth and power. It is the light of Christ; it is the life that is in all things; it is the law by which all things are governed; it is truth shining forth in darkness; it is the power of God who sitteth upon his throne. It may be that it is also priesthood and faith and omnipotence, for these too are the power of God.

This light of truth or light of Christ is seen in the light of the luminaries of heaven; it is the power by which the sun, moon, and stars, and the earth itself are made. It is the light that proceedeth forth from the presence of God to fill the immensity of space." It “is "the “light which is in all things, which giveth life to all things, which is the law by which all things are governed, even the power of God who sitteth upon his throne, who is in the bosom of eternity, who is in the midst of all things." It “is the agency of God’s power; it is the means and way whereby "he “comprehended all things," so “that "all” things are before him, and all things are round about him." It” is the way whereby "he “s above all things, and in all things, and is through all things, and is round about all things." Because of it, "all” things are by him, and of him, even God, forever and ever." (D&C 88:6-13, 41.)

Thus, when the Mosaic account of the creation says that "the “Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters" (Genesis 1:2), and when Abraham records of those same events that "the “Spirit of the Gods was brooding upon the face of the waters" (Abraham 4:2), the revealed word is speaking of the light of Christ. And when Job says that "by “is spirit [the Lord] hath garnished the heavens" (Job 26:13), and the Psalmist explains that all things were created because the Lord sent forth his spirit, by which also he "renews the face of the earth" (Psalm 104:30), both are teaching the same truth. Creation itself came by the light of Christ.

The light of Christ is neither the Holy Ghost nor the gift of the Holy Ghost; but that member of the Godhead, because he along with the Father and the Son is God, uses the light of Christ for his purposes. Thus spiritual gifts, the gifts of God meaning faith, miracles, prophecy, and all the rest come from God by the power of the Holy Ghost. Men prophesy, for instance, when moved upon by the Holy Ghost. And yet Moroni says: "All “these gifts come by the Spirit of Christ" (Moroni 10:17), meaning that the Holy Ghost uses the light of Christ to transmit his gifts. But the Spirit of Christ, by which the Holy Ghost operates, is no more the Holy Ghost himself than the light and heat of the sun are the sun itself.

 

The Light of Christ

President Marion G. Romney
Conference Report, Apr. 1977, p. 59-63;
or Ensign, May 1977, p. 43-45

My brethren, I pray, and ask you to join in that prayer, that while I speak we will enjoy the Spirit of Christ. If we don't enjoy it, we won't enjoy these remarks, because my topic is "The “Light of Christ." There are three phases of the light of Christ that I want to mention.

The first one is the light which enlighteneth every man that cometh into the world;
The second phase is the gift of the Holy Ghost;
And the third is the more sure word of prophecy.

The Light of Christ

In the eighty-eighth section of the Doctrine and Covenants, the Lord says, "The “light of Christ . . . proceedeth forth from the presence of God to fill the immensity of space." (V”. 7, 12 [D&C 88:7, 12].)

In another revelation, it is written that this light, which is "the “Spirit of Jesus Christ . . . giveth light to every man that cometh into the world; and the Spirit enlighteneth every man through the world, that hearkeneth to the voice of the Spirit." (D”C 84:45­46.)

This Spirit is, no doubt, the source of one’s conscience, which Webster defines as “a knowledge or feeling of right and wrong with a compulsion to do right.”

Mormon was alluding to this Spirit when he wrote to his son Moroni that “every thing which inviteth and enticeth [CR, p. 60] to do good, and to love God, and to serve him, is inspired of God.

“Wherefore, take heed, my beloved brethren, that ye do not judge that which is evil to be of God, or that which is good and of God to be of the devil.

“For behold, my brethren, it is given unto you to judge, [and that gift is because the light of Christ enlighteneth every man that cometh into the world], that ye may know good from evil; and the way to judge is as plain, that ye may know with a perfect knowledge, as the daylight is from the dark night.

“For behold, the Spirit of Christ is given to every man that he may know good from evil.” (Moro. 7:13­16 [Moroni 7:13­16].)

President Joseph F. Smith says that this Spirit of Christ “strives with . . . men, and will continue to strive with them [if they will resist the enticings of Satan], until it brings them to a knowledge of the truth and the possession of the greater light and testimony of the Holy Ghost.” (Gospel Doctrine, Deseret Book Co., 1973, pp. 67­68.)
 

Gift of the Holy Ghost

Now, this statement of President Smith’s brings us to a consideration of the second phase of our subject: the gift of the Holy Ghost.

The Holy Ghost is a person, a [Ensign, p. 44] spirit, the third member of the Godhead. He is a messenger and a witness of the Father and the Son. He brings to men testimony, witness, and knowledge of God the Father, Jesus Christ His Son, and the truths of the gospel. He vitalizes truth in the hearts and souls of men.

“There is a difference,” said the Prophet Joseph Smith, “between the Holy Ghost and the gift of the Holy Ghost. Cornelius received the Holy Ghost before he was baptized, which was the convincing power of God unto him of the truth of the Gospel, but he could not receive the gift of the Holy Ghost until after he was baptized. Had he not [been baptized], the Holy Ghost which convinced him of the truth of God, would have left him.” (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p. 199.) That’s not my statement; that’s the statement of the Prophet Joseph Smith. But I know it’s true.

The gift of the Holy Ghost confers upon one, as long as he is worthy, the right to receive light and truth.

Obtaining the gift of the Holy Ghost is preceded by faith, repentance, and baptism. Retaining the spirit, power, and guidance of the Holy Ghost requires a righteous life–a dedicated effort to constantly comply with the laws and ordinances of the gospel.
 

Member of the Godhead

The Holy Ghost is, as we have said, the third member of the Godhead. Of Him the Prophet Joseph said:

“The Holy Ghost has not a body of flesh and bones [as we know that God and Jesus Christ have], but is a personage of Spirit.” (D&C 130:22.)

The Holy Ghost is the great witness of, the messenger for, and testifier of the Father and the Son. The Savior, speaking of Him as the “Spirit of truth,” said:

“When he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come.

“He shall glorify me: for he shall receive of mine, and shall shew it unto you.” (John 16:13­14.)

By the witness and power of the Holy Ghost we receive personal testimonies of the truths of the gospel, including knowledge of God the Father and His beloved Son, Jesus Christ, our Savior and Redeemer.

Notwithstanding the availability of the gifts of the Holy Ghost, there are many people who live within reach of them who fail to see them. Concerning such tragedy, the Lord said:

“Behold, I am Jesus Christ, the Son [CR, p. 61] of God. I am the same that came unto mine own, and mine own received me not. I am the light which shineth in darkness, and the darkness comprehendeth it not.” (D&C 6:21.)
 

Comprehending the light

All three of the synoptic Gospel writers record the following classic illustration of the difficulty one in darkness has in comprehending the light. Matthew’s version reads:

“When Jesus came into the coasts of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, saying, Whom do men say that I the Son of man am?

“And they said, Some say that thou art John the Baptist: some, Elias; and others, Jeremias, or one of the prophets.” (Matt. 16: 13­14.)

Now, the people who expressed these opinions were Christ’s contemporaries. Their conclusions evidenced the fact that they knew something about His mighty works. No doubt they were aware of His claim that He was the Son of God. Their minds, however, were opaque to the light of His true identity. Although the light was shining brightly about them, they “comprehended it not.”

Having heard their answer as to who men said He was, Jesus directed to His disciples the question, “But whom say ye that I am?” (Matt. 16:15 [Matthew 16:15].)

Then Peter, speaking for himself and presumptively for the others, answered, “Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God.” (Matt. 16:16 [Matthew 16:16] .) In this declaration, Peter evidenced the fact that he and his fellow disciples did comprehend the light shining in the world of spiritual darkness around them.

In His response to Peter’s answer, Jesus declared a truth understood only by those who comprehend the light by and through the gift and power of the Holy Ghost, for Jesus’ answer was:

“Flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee,” He said, “but my Father which is in heaven, . . . and upon this rock”–meaning, upon the rock of revelation, which comes by means of the Holy Ghost–“I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.” (Matt. 16:17­18 [Matthew 16:17­18].)

How difficult it is to get one in darkness to comprehend the light or to believe that there is such light is illustrated by John’s account of the interview between Jesus and Nicodemus.

“There was,” says John, “a man of the Pharisees, named Nicodemus, a ruler of the Jews:

“[Who] came to Jesus by night, and said unto him, Rabbi, we know that thou art a teacher come from God: for no man can do these miracles that thou doest, except God be with him.

“Jesus answered and said . . . Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.

“Nicodemus saith unto him, How can a man be born when he is old? Can he enter the second time into his mother’s womb, and be born?

“Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.” (John 3:1­5; see also 3:6­10.)

One is born again by actually receiving and experiencing the light and power inherent in the gift of the Holy Ghost.
 

“More sure word of prophecy”

Now, concerning the third phase of our theme, “the more sure word of prophecy” (D&C 131:5), which is obtained by making one’s “calling and election sure” (2 Pet. 1:10 [2 Peter 1:10]), the Prophet Joseph said:

“After a person has faith in Christ, repents of his sins, and is baptized for the remission of his sins and receives the Holy Ghost, (by the laying on of hands) . . . then let him continue to humble himself before God, hungering and thirsting after righteousness, and [CR, p. 62] living by every word of God, and the Lord will soon say unto him, Son, thou shalt be exalted. When the Lord has thoroughly proved him, and finds that the man is determined to serve Him at all hazards, then the man will find his calling and his election made sure, then it will be his privilege to receive the other Comforter, which the Lord hath promised the Saints, as is recorded in the testimony of St. John.” (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p. 150.)

In the eighty-eighth section of the Doctrine and Covenants is recorded a revelation in which the Lord, addressing some of the early Saints in Ohio, said:

“I now send upon you another Comforter, even upon you my friends, that it may abide in your hearts, even the Holy Spirit of promise; which other Comforter is the same that I promised unto my disciples, as is recorded in the testimony of John.

“This Comforter is the promise which I give unto you of eternal life, even the glory of the celestial kingdom.” (D&C 88:3­4.)

I should think that all faithful Latter-day Saints “would want that more sure word of prophecy, that they were sealed in the heavens and had the promise of eternal life in the kingdom of God.” (History of the Church of Jesus [Ensign, p. 45] Christ of Latter-day Saints, 5:388.)
 

Anchor to men’s souls

As I read the sacred records, I find recorded experiences of men in all dispensations who have had this more sure anchor to their souls, this peace in their hearts.

Lehi’s grandson Enos so hungered after righteousness that he cried unto the Lord until “there came a voice unto [him], saying: Enos, thy sins are forgiven thee, and thou shalt be blessed.” (Enos 5 [Enos 1:5] .) Years later Enos revealed the nature of this promised blessing when he wrote:

“I soon go to the place of my rest, which is with my Redeemer; for I know that in him I shall rest. And I rejoice in the day when my mortal shall put on immortality, and shall stand before him; then shall I see his face with pleasure, and he will say unto me: Come unto me, ye blessed, there is a place prepared for you in the mansions of my Father.” (Enos 27 [Enos 1:27] .)

To Alma the Lord said, “Thou art my servant; and I covenant with thee that thou shalt have eternal life.” (Mosiah 26:20.)

To His twelve Nephite disciples, the Master said:

“What is it that ye desire of me, after that I am gone to the Father?

“And they all spake, save it were three, saying: We desire that after we have lived unto the age of man, that our ministry, wherein thou hast called us, may have an end, that we may speedily come unto thee in thy kingdom.

“And he said unto them: Blessed are ye because ye desired this thing of me; therefore, after that ye are seventy and two years old ye shall come unto me in my kingdom; and with me ye shall find rest.” (3 Ne. 28:1­3 [3 Nephi 28:1­3] .)

As Moroni labored in solitude abridging the Jaredite record, he received from the Lord this comforting assurance:

“Thou hast been faithful; wherefore, thy garments shall be made clean. And because thou hast seen thy weakness thou shalt be made strong, even unto the sitting down in the place which I have prepared in the mansions of my Father.” (Eth. 12:37 [Ether 12:37] .)

Paul, in his second epistle to Timothy, wrote:

“I am now ready to be offered, and the time of my departure is at hand.

“I have fought a good fight, I have finished my course, I have kept the faith:

“Henceforth there is laid up for me a crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous judge, shall give me at that day.” (2 Tim. 4:6­8 [2 Timothy 4:6­8].)
 

Assurances in our day

In this dispensation many have received like assurances. In the spring of 1839, while the Prophet Joseph and his associates were languishing in Liberty Jail, Heber C. Kimball, our president’s grandfather, labored against great odds caring for the Saints and striving to free the brethren who were in jail. On the sixth of April he wrote:

“My family having been gone about two months, during which time I heard nothing from them; our brethren being in prison; death and destruction following us everywhere we went; I felt very sorrowful and lonely. The following words came to mind, and the Spirit said unto me, ‘write,’ which I did by taking a piece of paper and writing on my knee as follows: . . .

“Verily I say unto my servant Heber, thou art my son, in whom I am well pleased; for thou art careful to hearken to my words, and not transgress my law, nor rebel against my servant Joseph Smith, for thou hast a respect to the words of mine anointed, even from the least to the greatest of them; therefore”–listen to this–“thy name is written in heaven, no more to be blotted out for ever.” (Orson F. Whitney, Life of Heber C. Kimball, Bookcraft, 1975, p. 241; italics added.)

To the Prophet Joseph Smith the Lord said:

“I am the Lord thy God, and will be with thee even unto the end of the world, and through all eternity; for verily I seal upon you your exaltation, and prepare a throne for you in the kingdom of my Father, with Abraham your father.” (D&C 132:49; italics added.)
 

Witness of truths

Now my beloved brethren, by way of summary and conclusion, I bear witness to the verity of these great truths. I know that the Spirit of Christ enlighteneth “every man that cometh into the world; and [that] the Spirit enlighteneth every man through the world, that hearkeneth to the voice of the Spirit.” (D&C 84:46.)

I know that everyone who, following the whisperings of the Spirit, develops faith, is baptized, and receives the Holy Ghost through the laying on of hands by those having authority, may, by compliance with the teachings of the gospel, receive the gifts and the power of the Holy Ghost.

And I bear further witness that every such person who, having come this far, will follow the Prophet’s admonition to “continue to humble himself before God, hungering and thirsting after righteousness, and living by every word of God” (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p. 150), may obtain the more sure word of prophecy.

That the Lord will bless all of us priesthood bearers that we will so understand these great truths, that in the end we shall, by making our calling and election sure, enjoy the full light of Christ, I humbly pray, in the name of Jesus Christ, our Redeemer. Amen.

D&C 93:39-45 – The wicked one takes away light and truth form us through disobedience.  We are supposed to bring up our children in light and truth.

 

The 1st Presidency was chastened because they did not raise their children in light and truth; they were condemned for their lack of teaching in their homes.  They needed to get their family in order there is nothing more important for us to do.  We can become friends with God; He loves us and wants us with Him as a family, the highest degree in the Celestial kingdom.

 

Children—Light and Truth

 

The Lord has commanded Latter-day Saints to rear their children in light and truth. (D&C 93:40, 49.) There is none in the Church who is beyond this commandment. Even members of the First Presidency in 1833 were told they had not kept this commandment. This was said of President Frederick G. Williams and Sidney Rigdon, counselors to President Joseph Smith. Unless they were obedient in setting their houses in order Satan would continue to have power over them. (Ibid., 93:41-44.) Even the Prophet lacked in this matter also. An important truth was also taught regarding children.

 

Your family must needs repent and forsake some things, and give more earnest heed unto your sayings, or be removed out of their place. (Ibid., 93:48.)

 

In other words, responsibility is not only the parent’s but also the child’s. But the major obligation is with the parents who are to teach their children principles of righteousness. (Ibid, 68:25-31.) The home evening program in use throughout the Church is one of the best means by which this commandment can be lived by parents and children. No other people have the opportunity to rear their children in light and truth as do the Latter-day Saints. It is also true that no other people are under the same responsibility as they are. When one considers the truth that the children who come into a Latter-day Saint family are known to have come from our Father and that what we do or do not do for them here, determines, in a large measure, their eternal future, the weight of this responsibility is better appreciated.

 

Latter-day Saint families are intended to be eternal. The association of parents and children throughout the eternities is the desired goal of every faithful member of the Church. Eternal marriage is the qualifying ordinance, together with keeping the commandments and obligations received in the House of the Lord. The words of President Joseph F. Smith are especially pertinent to these thoughts:

 

We are living for eternity and not merely for the moment. Death does not part us from one another, if we have entered into sacred relationships with each other by virtue of the authority that God has revealed to the children of men. Our relationships are formed for eternity. We are immortal beings, and we are looking forward to the growth that is to be attained in an exalted life after we have proved ourselves faithful and true to the covenants that we have entered into here, and then we shall receive a fulness of joy. (Gospel Doctrine, 6th edition, pp. 277-278.)

 

 

(Roy W. Doxey, The Doctrine and Covenants Speaks [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1964], 2: 202.)

 

 

 

There is no one in the Church who is exempt from teaching his children the restored gospel. So emphatic is the Lord concerning this matter, that, in 1833 he rebuked the members of the First Presidency composed of Joseph Smith, Frederick G. Williams, and Sidney Rigdon, because of their failure to comply completely with this admonition. (D&C 93:43D&C 93:40-48.)

 

In addition to the need, perhaps this rebuke by the Lord was to be an object lesson for all members of the Church relative to their own responsibilities. There comes a time, however, as indicated concerning the Prophet in verse 48 of Section 93, when the members of a family stand condemned, if they do not give heed to the righteous teachings of the parents.

 

 

(Roy W. Doxey, The Doctrine and Covenants Speaks [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1964], 1: 121.)

 

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 93:49.)

 

49 What I say unto one I say unto all; pray always lest that wicked one have power in you, and remove you out of your place.

 

 

D&C 93:49 – Prayer literally connects you to the power source (God).  We pray to understand the will of God, pray in faith, “thy will be done”

 

With sin we need to do more then confess to the Bishop, we need to convince Christ to take on our sins.

 

What gives keys power is our faith – God will never override our agency.

 

As Bishop at the college, Bruce gives the confessor the following to do:  On the website

 

  1. 3 talks on Faith

 

    1. President Marion G. Romney – “Faith in the Lord Jesus Christ”
    2. Elder Dallin H. Oaks – “Faith in the Lord Jesus Christ”
    3. Elder Joseph B. Wirthlin – “Shall He Find Faith on the Earth”

 

Absolute confidence in things we cannot see

Combined with action, that is in

Absolute conformity to the will of God

 

Then we qualify for the Gift of the Holy Ghost

 

  1. Bishop prays to the Lord to find out what action should take place, the sinner’s faith must exist in order for the answer to come.

 

Temple question – Will you do whatever the Prophet (Holder of ALL keys) asks?  Do you have faith in his keys?

 

We plug into the power source by faith, faith in the Lord Jesus Christ.

 

  1. Then he gives them 4 articles on Repentance

 

    1. President Spencer W. Kimball – “ What is True Repentance”
    2. President Marion G. Romney – Place of Repentance in the Plan of Salvation”
    3. Elder Neal A. Maxwell – “Repentance”
    4. Elder Theodore M. Burton – “The Meaning of Repentance” (Excellent overview)

 

 

(Ether 3:9-11.)

 

9 And the Lord said unto him: Because of thy faith thou hast seen that I shall take upon me flesh and blood; and never has man come before me with such exceeding faith as thou hast; for were it not so ye could not have seen my finger. Sawest thou more than this?

 

10 And he answered: Nay; Lord, show thyself unto me.

 

11 And the Lord said unto him: Believest thou the words which I shall speak?

 

The faith of the brother of Jared, he would do whatever was asked of him.

 

D&C 94 – The Lord told the saints to build a temple for the School of the Prophets.

 

                    D&C 88:119                                 D&C 94:3                                      D&C 94:10

                                                          

                        Kirtland >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Administration >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Printing

                        Temple                                  Building                                            Office

 

 

 

1.  A conference of high priests assembled April 30, 1833, in the school room in Kirtland and took steps to raise means to pay the rent for the house where their meetings had been held during the past season. John P. Green was appointed to take charge of a branch of the Church in Parkman County. It was also decided that Sister Vienna Jaques should not proceed immediately on her way to Zion, but wait until William Hobart and others were ready, as it would be a matter of safety. The next day the conference again convened and took into consideration the necessity of building a schoolhouse, for the accommodation of the elders, who were to come together to receive instruction preparatory to taking missions and continuing in the ministry according to the revelation of March 8, 1833. By unanimous voice of the conference, Hyrum Smith, Jared Carter and Reynolds Cahoon were appointed a committee to obtain subscriptions for the purpose of erecting such a building. Two days later the Lord gave a revelation with directions for the building of this house. He declared that it should be built according to his pattern and not according to the pattern of the world. A lot was set apart for the building of a house for the use of the First Presidency and where revelation could be given and all matters pertaining to the progress of the Church could receive proper attention. The dimensions of the house were to be fifty-five by sixty-five feet “in the width thereof and in length thereof, in the inner court.” There were to be a lower and a higher court, and the Lord promised to give the pattern for these at a later time. It was to be dedicated unto the Lord from the foundation thereof, according to the order of the Priesthood. There is no question that the First Presidency needed a place where they could attend to the matters of Church government. This was to be a sacred house; no unclean thing was to be permitted to enter it, and if the builders would remember this the presence of the Lord should be in the building.

 

2. The second lot south of this building was to be dedicated for the building of another house where the printing for the Church could be done and the translation of the Scriptures, on which the Prophet had been working off and on for many months, could be published. This building likewise to be fifty-five by sixty-five feet, with a lower and an upper court. This house also was to be dedicated to the service of the Lord, and set apart for the printing, “in all things whatsoever I shall command you, to be holy, undefiled according to the pattern in all things, as it shall be given unto you.” The third lot was to be given to Hyrum Smith for his inheritance. Reynolds Cahoon and Jared Carter were also to receive inheritances, “that they may do the work which I have appointed unto them, to be committed to build mine houses, according to the commandment, which I, the Lord God have given unto you.” These two houses, although the Lord approved these plans, he further said were not to be built until he should give the commandment for the building of them.

 

The committee according to their appointment issued a circular and sent it forth among the members of the Church in the different branches asking that they bring about the fulfillment of the command of the Lord concerning the establishing, or the preparation of a house, “wherein the elders, who have been commanded of the Lord so to do, may gather themselves together, and prepare all things, and call a solemn assembly, and treasure up words of wisdom, that they may go forth to the Gentiles for the last time. “This appeal went forth to the whole Church. It was a strong appeal and in their pleading they said: “And unless we fulfill this command, viz.: establish an house, and prepare all things necessary that the elders may gather into a school, called the School of the Prophets, and receive the instruction which the Lord designs they should receive, we may despair of obtaining the great blessing that God had promised to the faithful of the Church of Christ; therefore it is as important, as our salvation, that we obey this above-mentioned command, as well as all the commandments of the Lord.” They then called attention to their appointment to superintend the business in building this house for the elders so they could attend this school. They appealed to the branches that someone in each branch be appointed to obtain subscriptions and thus help the general committee. This appeal was issued June 1, 1833.

 

3. The same day the Lord gave another revelation (Sec. 95.) in which he rebuked the elders of the Church for their delay in building another house which they had been commanded to build. This was the Kirtland Temple. “For ye have sinned against me a very grievous sin, in that ye have not considered the great commandment in all things that I have given unto you concerning the building of mine house. This house was to be prepared for the apostles in which they might be endowed to prune the vineyard “for the last time that I may bring to pass my strange act that I may pour out my Spirit upon all flesh.” The Lord said that there had been many ordained to go forth and do his will, but few of them are chosen, and the reason why they were not chosen was that they had sinned a very grievous sin, in that they are walking in darkness at noonday. “And for this cause I gave unto you a commandment that you should call your solemn assembly that your fastings and your mourning might come up into the ears of the Lord of Sabaoth, which is by interpretation, the Creator of the first day, the beginning and the end. Yea, Verily I say unto you, I gave unto you a commandment, that you should build a house, in the which house I design to endow those whom I have chosen with power from on high; for this is the promise of the Father unto you, therefore I command you to tarry, even as mine apostles in Jerusalem. Nevertheless my servants sinned a very grievous sin, and contentions arose in the School of the Prophets, which were very grievous unto me, saith your Lord; therefore I sent them forth to be chastened.”

 

4. It was Dec. 27, 1832, that the Lord gave the command to the Church that his house should be built, in which he said: “Organize yourselves; prepare every needful thing; and establish a house, even a house of prayer, a house of fasting, a house of faith, a house of learning, a house of glory, a house of order, a house of God.” (Sec. 88:119.) The elders of the Church it would appear, had not taken this command seriously, presumably it had been overlooked in the consideration of so many wonderful things in that particular revelation. The month of May, in the following year, had arrived; the officers of the Church had met in solemn council to consider other matters, the building of other houses for which there was sore need, and the building of the more weighty and important building had been neglected. While the Lord approved the plan for the building of these other houses, and commended the brethren for their enthusiasm and energy in taking steps to erect them, yet he called attention to the grievous sins of the brethren in their neglect to build the more important structure. The Kirtland Temple was necessary before the apostles (who had not yet been called), and other elders of the Church could receive the endowment which the Lord had in store for them. The elders had been out preaching the Gospel and crying repentance ever since the Church was organized and many great men had heard and embraced the truth, nevertheless the elders could not go forth in the power and authority which the Lord intended them to possess until this Temple was built where he could restore keys and powers essential to the more complete preaching of the Gospel and the administering in its ordinances. This point will be further discussed when we consider the dedication of the Kirtland Temple.

 

5. At the time of which we are now speaking, we have discovered that the anger of the Lord is kindled against the brethren for neglect of their most important duty, and now the Lord says: “Verily I say unto you, it is my will that you should build a house. If you keep my commandments you shall have power to build it. If you keep not my commandments, the love of the Father shall not continue with you, therefore you shall walk in darkness.” (Vs. 11-12.)

 

6. This house was not to be built after the manner of the world, but after the manner which the Lord would show them. The saints also were not to live after the manner of the world. This building also was to be fifty-five by sixty-five feet in the inner court as the Lord had instructed in the buildings previously mentioned. The lower part of the inner court of this Temple was to be dedicated unto the Lord for the sacrament offerings and for the preaching, and for fasting and prayer, and the offering “of your most holy desires unto me, saith your Lord.” The upper floor, or court, was to be dedicated unto the Lord as “the school of mine apostles,” the Lord declared in closing his revelation. However, this building was to be erected for other and greater purposes than those made known at this time to the officers and members of the Church. The time had not come for the real purposes and the nature of the endowment to be revealed. The elders, much less the members, were not prepared in 1833 for the fulness of the revelation which the Lord declared would be bestowed upon them. The severe rebuke administered to the Church had its effect and the brethren forgot the need of other buildings and commenced to concentrate their efforts upon this house of the Lord.

 

7. Two days after this revelation was given the brethren again assembled to see how to dispose of property, or to carry out the provisions of the commandment. They also considered the matter of dividing lots according to wisdom (D. & C. 96.) and the Lord gave them counsel in relation to these matters. The Stake of Zion was to become strong. The poor were to be cared for. The bishop, Newel K. Whitney, was to take charge of the matter of assigning lots and preparing them for the building of a city and a Temple to the name of the Lord. John Johnson was to be given responsibility and admitted into the united order, so that he could assist in bringing forth the word of the Lord to the children of men.

 

8. Four days after the Lord had rebuked the brethren for their neglect, without waiting for subscriptions, the brethren went to work on the Temple. Elder George A. Smith, a recent convert, hauled the first load of stone for the Temple. Hyrum Smith and Reynolds Cahoon commenced digging the trench for the walls, and they finished the same with their own hands. June 6th, a conference was held of the high priests with the Presidency of the High Priesthood where the matter was considered of appointing a committee to take the oversight of the building of the House of the Lord. The conference appointed Reynolds Cahoon, Jared Carter and Hyrum Smith, who were instructed to “proceed immediately to commence building the house, or the obtaining materials, stone, brick, lumber, etc., for the same.” This instruction to the members of the committee was unnecessary so far as their enthusiasm was concerned. They had already commenced the work of building, and this work continued with haste, in the poverty of the people. July 23, 1833, the building had advanced to the point that the corner stones were laid after the order of the Holy Priesthood. (D.H.C. Vol. 1:400.) No explanation of the proper order of temple building was recorded on this occasion, but at the time of the laying of the corner stones of the Nauvoo Temple, the Prophet gave this order which is as follows:

 

9. “If the strict order of the Priesthood were carried out in the building of temples, the first stone would be laid at the southeast corner, by the First Presidency of the Church. The southwest corner should be laid next; the third, or northwest corner next; and the fourth, or northeast corner last. The First Presidency should lay the southeast corner stone and dictate who are the proper persons to lay the other corner stones.

 

“If a temple is built at a distance, and the First Presidency are not present, then the quorum of the Twelve Apostles are the persons to dictate the order for that temple; and in the absence of the Twelve Apostles, then the presidency of the stake will lay the southeast corner stone; the Melchizedek Priesthood laying the corner stones on the east side of the temple, and the Lesser Priesthood those on the west side.”—“Essentials in Church History,” pp. 309-310.

 

10. While these matters were being considered in relation to the building of Kirtland Temple, an unfortunate incident occurred which was to have far-reaching effect into the future to aid the enemies of the Church in their attacks on this latter day work. A man named Philastus Hurlburt had a short time before joined the Church. He was a large man of pleasing appearance, but lacking in most all other good qualities. He was called “Doctor Hurlburt,” not because he was a doctor, which he was not, but because he was the “seventh son in his father’s family,” according to a current superstition that the seventh son would possess qualities that would make him a successful physician. June 3, 1833, an accusation was brought against him for “unchristian conduct with women while on a mission to the east.” The trial resulted in his commission being taken from him and he declared no longer a member of the Church. June 21st, he asked for a rehearing as he was dissatisfied with the decision of the council. On the show of some repentance the council voted that “Brother Hurlburt be granted a re-hearing,” and after prayer, the council proceeded to consider several matters and then took up the Hurlburt case. The evidence was clear against him, and his deportment of such a nature that he was worthy of excommunication; however on his confession and repentance he was restored. Two days later, however, he was again called in question because he had said that he had “deceived Joseph Smith’s God,” and on the testimony of witnesses he was excommunicated. He then manifested extreme bitterness against the Prophet. It was later discovered that he had been excluded from the Methodists because of immoral conduct. After his excommunication he entered into collusion with E. D. Howe to perpetrate what they thought to be a very clever fraud that would strike at the heart of the Church. It appears that Philastus Hurlburt while on a missionary tour heard of the manuscript written by Solomon Spaulding which dealt with the American Indians. Hurlburt thought that if he could make it appear that the Book of Mormon was Spaulding’s manuscript, which had disappeared, he could destroy the Book of Mormon. Witnesses were found, like the witnesses who testified against the Savior, and this story was published and sent broadcast to the world, As the Spaulding manuscript could not be produced, the story of these wicked men was greedily seized upon by enemies of the Church and did considerable effective work in poisoning the minds of many people for many years. Finally this manuscript was found. Miraculously the Lord had seen that it was preserved to come forth at a later day and when it was revealed this fraudulent story ceased to have any effect. For a full discussion of the Spaulding Story, reference is made to “The Myth of the Manuscript Found,” by Elder George Reynolds, and “New Witness for God,” Vol. 3:354, by Elder B. H. Roberts. Other references: “Life of Joseph F. Smith,” Chapter 23.

 

 

(Joseph Fielding Smith, Church History and Modern Revelation, 4 vols. [Salt Lake City: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 1946-1949], 2: 164 – 165.)

 

 

 

D&C 95 – The saints were chastened for not building the Temple, verse 3.  January, 1833 the School of the Prophets began, School of the Prophets lessons were taught at the printing building.

 

“Messenger and Advocate” was printed here, the printing office was built 1st.

 

 

Joseph Fielding Smith: Introduction

 

The committee [Section 94, Introduction], according to their appointment, issued a circular and sent it forth among the members of the Church in the different branches of the Church asking that they bring about the fulfillment of the command of the Lord concerning the establishing, or the preparation of a house, “wherein the elders, who have been commanded of the Lord so to do, may gather themselves together, and prepare all things, and call a solemn assembly, and treasure up words of wisdom, that they may go forth to the Gentiles for the last time.” This appeal went forth to the whole Church. It was a strong appeal and in their pleading they said: “And unless we fulfil this command, viz.: establish an house, and prepare all things necessary that the elders may gather into a school called the School of the Prophets, and receive the instruction which the Lord desires they should receive, we may despair of obtaining the great blessing that God has promised to the faithful of the Church of Christ; therefore it is important, as our salvation, that we obey this above-mentioned command as well as all the commandments of the Lord.” They then called attention to their appointment to superintend the business in building this house for the elders so they could attend this school. They appealed to the branches that someone in each branch be appointed to obtain subscriptions and thus help the general committee. This appeal was issued June 1, 1833. (CHMR, 1948, 2:165-66.)

 

Joseph Fielding Smith: 1-10

 

The same day, [June 1, 1833] the Lord gave another revelation (Sec. 95) in which he rebuked the elders of the Church for their delay in building another house which they had been commanded to build. This was the Kirtland Temple. [Sec. 95:3, quoted.] This house was to be prepared for the apostles in which they might be endowed “to prune the vineyard for the last time, that I may bring to pass my strange act.” (95:4.) The Lord said that there had been many ordained to go forth and do his will, but few of them are chosen, and the reason why they were not chosen was that they had sinned a very grievous sin, in that they are walking in darkness at noonday. [Sec. 95:7-10, quoted.]

 

It was Dec. 27, 1832, that the Lord gave the command to the Church that his house should be built, in which he said: “Organize yourselves; prepare every needful thing; and establish a house, even a house of prayer, a house of fasting, a house of faith, a house of learning, a house of glory, a house of order, a house of God.” (Sec. 88:119.) The elders of the Church it would appear, had not taken this command seriously, presumably it had been overlooked in the consideration of so many wonderful things in that particular revelation. The month of May, in the following year, had arrived; the officers of the Church had met in solemn council to consider other matters, the building of other houses for which there was sore need, and the building of the more weighty and important buildings had been neglected. While the Lord approved the plan for the building of these other houses, and commended the brethren for their enthusiasm and energy in taking steps to erect them, yet he called attention to the grievous sins of the brethren in their neglect to build the more important structure. The Kirtland Temple was necessary before the apostles (who had not yet been called), and other elders of the Church could receive the endowment which the Lord had in store for them. The elders had been out preaching the Gospel and crying repentance ever since the Church was organized and many great men had heard and embraced the truth, nevertheless the elders could not go forth in the power and authority which the Lord intended them to possess until this Temple was built where he could restore keys and powers essential to the more complete preaching of the gospel and the administering of its ordinances. (CHMR, 1948, 2:166-67.)

 

Brigham Young: 2

 

Ye must needs be chastened

 

At times I may to many of the brethren appear to be severe. I sometimes chasten them; but it is because I wish them to so live that the power of God, like a flame of fire, will dwell within them and be round about them. These are my feelings and desires. (JD, May 20, 1860, 8:62.)

 

Joseph Fielding Smith: 11-17

 

At the time of which we are now speaking, we have discovered that the anger of the Lord is kindled against the brethren for neglect of their most important duty, and now the Lord says: [Sec. 95:11-12, quoted.]

 

This house was not to be built after the manner of the world, but after the manner which the Lord would show them. The saints also were not to live after the manner of the world. This building also was to be fifty-five by sixty-five feet in the inner court as the Lord had instructed in the buildings previously mentioned. [Sec. 94:4, 11.] The lower part of the inner court of this Temple was to be dedicated unto the Lord for the sacrament offerings and for the preaching, and for fasting and prayer, and the offering “of your most holy desires unto me, saith your Lord.” (Sec. 95:16.) The upper floor, or court, was to be dedicated unto the Lord as “the school of mine apostles” (Sec. 95:17), the Lord declared in closing his revelation. However, this building was to be erected for other and greater purposes than those made known at this time to the officers and members of the Church. The time had not come for the real purposes and the nature of the endowment to be revealed. The elders, much less the members, were not prepared in 1833 for the fulness of the revelation which the Lord declared would be bestowed upon them. The severe rebuke administered to the Church had its effect and the brethren forgot the need of other buildings and commenced to concentrate their efforts upon this house of the Lord.(CHMR,1948, 2:167.)

 

Orson Pratt: 11-17

 

When the Lord commanded this people to build a house in the land of Kirtland, in the early rise of this church, he gave them the pattern by vision from heaven, and commanded them to build that house according to that pattern and order; to have the architecture, not in accordance with architecture devised by men, but to have everything constructed in that house according to the heavenly pattern that he by his voice had inspired to his servants. When this was complied with did the Lord accept that house? Yes! They having complied with the order and built the house according to the pattern, the Lord condescended to grace that house with His presence. In that house the veil was taken away from the eyes of many of the servants of God and they beheld his glory. In that house the Lord Jesus Christ was seen by some of the Elders of the Church in heavenly vision standing upon the threshold of the pulpit proclaiming himself to be Alpha and Omega, the first and the last, The Great I Am, etc. [Sec. 110:1-10.] And he gave keys of instruction and counsel and authority to his servants, declaring unto them that he accepted that house at their hands, and inasmuch as they had been faithful in the performance of their duty in building a temple to His name, He blessed them therein. He also proclaimed unto them that from that house His servants should go forth armed with the power of his priesthood, and proclaim the Gospel among the various nations, and that many people should come from the uttermost parts of the earth and praise the name of the Lord in Zion, and in the midst of His house. Thus did the Lord, when we fulfilled on our part, fulfil His promises on His part. (JD, April 9, 1871, 14:273-74.)

 

 

(Roy W. Doxey, comp., Latter-day Prophets and the Doctrine and Covenants [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1978], 3: 301.)

 

 

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 38:32.) – D&C 95:4, 8-9 the need for the Temple

 

32 Wherefore, for this cause I gave unto you the commandment that ye should go to the Ohio; and there I will give unto you my law; and there you shall be endowed with power from on high;

 

 

 

Endowment

 

 

The word endow means “to furnish, provide, equip, or give.” In a general sense the word endowment could refer to the act or the process of endowing or to the thing that is being endowed (given). Among Latter-day Saints the word endowment has special meaning, as it refers to a special gift of knowledge or understanding of the eternal purposes of life that is given in the temple. As indicated in some of the following quotations, the “endowment” received by the Saints in the Kirtland Temple is not the same or as complete as the endowment given in temples today.

 

Selected Quotations

 

“As early as January, 1831, the Lord said he had called the members of the Church out of New York to the Ohio, and he would give them his law; and there they would be ‘endowed with power from on high.’ (D&C 38:32D&C 38:32.) In this same month he said he had kept in store a blessing such as is not known among the children of men, and it shall be poured forth upon their heads. And from thence men shall go forth into all nations. They were to go forth with greater power because of the endowment. In February, 1831, he further said that the elders should be taught from on high. ‘Sanctify yourselves and ye shall be endowed with power that ye may give even as I have spoken.’ (43:16.) In June, 1833, the Lord commanded that his house in Kirtland be built. ‘Yea, verily I say unto you, I gave unto you a commandment that you should build a house, in the which house, I design to endow those whom I have chosen with power from on high.’ (D&C 95:8.) The elders were commanded to tarry until they could receive this endowment.

 

“In Kirtland, November 12, 1835, in a council meeting with the apostles, the Prophet said: ‘You need an endowment, brethren, in order that you may be prepared and able to overcome all things; and those that reject your testimony will be damned.’ (HC 2:309.) January 20, 1836, a council meeting was held in the Kirtland Temple in which the endowment was given, consisting of washing, anointing with oil, washing of feet and other ordinances. It was on this occasion that the Prophet had the heavens opened to his view in which he saw the glory of the celestial kingdom, and the redemption of little children in the kingdom of God. (HC 2:379-381.)” (Joseph Fielding Smith, CHMR 2:304.)

 

“The endowment promised and received in the Kirtland Temple was not the same as today’s temple endowment ceremony, though priesthood members did participate in a ‘partial endowment, the full ordinance being reserved for a future performance when a temple designed for ordinance work itself should be built [at Nauvoo].’” (Bruce R. McConkie, Ensign, August 1976, p. 10.)

 

“The first complete endowments in this dispensation were given in Nauvoo, May 4, 1842. These, of course, could not be given in the temple, and were given elsewhere. In the time of poverty and when necessity requires the giving of blessings which belong to the House of the Lord, and there is no such house, they may be given in the wilderness, on a mountain or some other spot, consecrated to that purpose. The Savior had to give an endowment to Peter, James and John, on the Mount of Transfiguration. The saints of that dispensation had to be baptized for the dead and give other ordinances for the dead in the wilderness, for the temple in Jerusalem was closed to them and had been desecrated, therefore the wilderness, mountain tops and rivers, had to be utilized for the temple work for their dead in that dispensation.” (Joseph Fielding Smith, CHMR 2:333.)

 

Scriptural References:

 

D&C 38:32D&C 38:32, 38; 43:16; 95:8; 105:11-12, 18, 33; 110:9; 124:39; 132:59.

 

 

(Daniel H. Ludlow, A Companion to Your Study of the New Testament: The Four Gospels [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1982], 78.)

 

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 95:11-14.)

 

11 Verily I say unto you, it is my will that you should build a house. If you keep my commandments you shall have power to build it.

 

12 If you keep not my commandments, the love of the Father shall not continue with you, therefore you shall walk in darkness.

 

13 Now here is wisdom, and the mind of the Lord—let the house be built, not after the manner of the world, for I give not unto you that ye shall live after the manner of the world;

 

14 Therefore, let it be built after the manner which I shall show unto three of you, whom ye shall appoint and ordain unto this power.

 

 

The Lord can’t endow with power from on high until His people show their faith.  Start the temple and God will provide the means to accomplish it.  Keep the commandments and you will have power to build it.

 

If you don’t keep the commandments you won’t have the love of the Father and you will walk in darkness.

 

An example of verse 13 – the windows inside the chapel are all the way around it, while looking from the outside it seems normal, it is different then the manner of the world.  Verse 17, top floor was set aside for the School of the Prophets.

 

 

D&C 97 – A revelation given to Joseph while in Kirtland concerning the Saints in Missouri, what is happening there?

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 97:1-7.)

 

Verily I say unto you my friends, I speak unto you with my voice, even the voice of my Spirit, that I may show unto you my will concerning your brethren in the land of Zion, many of whom are truly humble and are seeking diligently to learn wisdom and to find truth.

 

2 Verily, verily I say unto you, blessed are such, for they shall obtain; for I, the Lord, show mercy unto all the meek, and upon all whomsoever I will, that I may be justified when I shall bring them unto judgment.

 

3 Behold, I say unto you, concerning the school in Zion, I, the Lord, am well pleased that there should be a school in Zion, and also with my servant Parley P. Pratt, for he abideth in me.

 

4 And inasmuch as he continueth to abide in me he shall continue to preside over the school in the land of Zion until I shall give unto him other commandments.

 

5 And I will bless him with a multiplicity of blessings, in expounding all scriptures and mysteries to the edification of the school, and of the church in Zion.

 

6 And to the residue of the school, I, the Lord, am willing to show mercy; nevertheless, there are those that must needs be chastened, and their works shall be made known.

 

7 The ax is laid at the root of the trees; and every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit shall be hewn down and cast into the fire. I, the Lord, have spoken it.

 

 

The School of the Prophets in Missouri was taught by Parley P. Pratt, and the Lord was pleased with him, yet others need to be chastened and humbled or they will be cast out of Missouri.

 

D&C 97:8-9 – The order of verse 8 reminds us of the Garden of Eden and the instructions to Adam and Eve, it is temple talk.

 

 

 Honest – Broken Heart – Contrite – Observe Covenants by Sacrifice – Keep every commandment from God

 

 

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 97:12-14.) – Purposes of Temples

 

12 Behold, this is the tithing and the sacrifice which I, the Lord, require at their hands, that there may be a house built unto me for the salvation of Zion

 

13 For a place of thanksgiving for all saints, and for a place of instruction for all those who are called to the work of the ministry in all their several callings and offices;

 

14 That they may be perfected in the understanding of their ministry, in theory, in principle, and in doctrine, in all things pertaining to the kingdom of God on the earth, the keys of which kingdom have been conferred upon you.

 

 

Purpose of Temples

 

  1. Salvation of Zion
  2. Place of Thanksgiving – Gratitude, increase your vision
  3. Place of Instruction – Teach Plan of Salvation, help us reach our full potential

 

The Saints become perfected in understanding theory, doctrine, and principles pertaining to the kingdom of God.

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 97:16.) – God will come to His house

 

16 Yea, and my presence shall be there, for I will come into it, and all the pure in heart that shall come into it shall see God.

 

 

The pure in heart (proper motive) can come to the temple and see God.  Pray in faith with proper motive, meaning, pray for the kingdom of God and to do God’s will.

 

The wicked focus on themselves instead of focusing on the kingdom, who shall escape God’s vengeance on the wicked?

 

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 97:25-27.) – Sin no more and be obedient to do God’s will

 

25 Nevertheless, Zion shall escape if she observe to do all things whatsoever I have commanded her.

 

26 But if she observe not to do whatsoever I have commanded her, I will visit her according to all her works, with sore affliction, with pestilence, with plague, with sword, with vengeance, with devouring fire.

 

27 Nevertheless, let it be read this once to her ears, that I, the Lord, have accepted of her offering; and if she sin no more none of these things shall come upon her;

 

D&C 101 – The Rest of the Story!

 

 

Counsel to the Exiles

(D&C 97-101)

 

ROBERT A. CLOWARD

 

In the revelations of the latter months of 1833 we find a most poignant portrayal of the relationship of the Lord to his people. In those times of their extreme need, the veils of formality and habit that too often separate God's people from him were parted. They cried out to him as humbled children. In the urgency of their need, they sought his hiding place. They searched their souls to purge out what might have offended him. They yearned for his response.

 

He heard their cries, and as an Exalted Father, he answered. This was a teaching moment, and if we are attuned to the Spirit that attends these revelations, we too can learn the lessons of Zion's redemption. As God counseled the exiles, he counsels us as well, for we share their quest. We too must establish Zion.

 

Historical Background

 

The joy of the Saints at learning the revealed location of the land of Zion was all too soon tempered by their dismay at the difficulties which encumbered them. The Lord had designated Jackson County as the place for the city of Zion in July 1831 (D&C 57:1-2), but within two years, vicious mobs were organized to expel the Saints from the county. In addition to the threats from without, a spirit of variance and dissension pervaded much of the Church in Missouri. Writing in January 1833 on behalf of a council of high priests in Kirtland, Hyrum Smith and Orson Hyde said, "we feel more like weeping over Zion than we do like rejoicing over her." fn

 

On 20 July 1833 a mob destroyed the printing establishment of William W. Phelps, and three days later Church leaders were forced to sign a pledge that they and the other members of the Church would leave Jackson County. Despite attempts at legal redress, severe persecution continued, and the majority of the Saints had been driven from their homes to take refuge in Clay, Ray, Van Buren, Lafayette, and other counties by November of that year. In sections 97, 98, 100, and 101., the Lord answered their questions and shared with them divine counsel.

 

The Saints' Questions

 

It is not difficult to imagine the kinds of questions that filled the hearts of the Saints as they faced the reality of their exile. This was an Abrahamic test—a test of incongruence, designed to try the foundations of their conviction. Undoubtedly they asked even the most basic questions: "Art thou there?" "Hast thou heard our prayers?" "Hast thou rejected us?" And if they were still found acceptable to the Lord, the flood of questions would continue: "Why have we been forced out of the designated gathering place?" "Is this persecution necessary?" "Will Zion be redeemed?" "Is there to be a new gathering place?" "How can we recover our lands and homes?" "Can we depend upon the law?" "Should we seek revenge upon our persecutors?" "What about thy temple?" fn

 

The Lord's Answers

 

Be Still

 

The Lord gave merciful answers. In one forceful phrase, he assured them of his concern for their plight: "Be still and know that I am God" (D&C 101:16). This command, the first person climax of Psalm 46, invoked the entire psalm, applicable in every way to their situation: "God is our refuge and strength, a very present help in trouble" (Ps. 46:1). fn

 

My People Must Be Tried in All Things

 

The opening verses of sections 97, 98, and 101 further defined the Saints' standing before the Lord. In section 101, for example, he assured them that they were not rejected, but he clarified his personal role in their affliction: "I, the Lord, have suffered the affliction to come upon them, wherewith they have been afflicted, in consequence of their transgressions; Yet I will own them, and they shall be mine in that day when I shall come to make up my jewels" (vv. 2-3, italics added). In an earlier revelation, the blessing of being among the chosen jewels of God was specified as belonging to those who did not incur his anger by failing to be faithful (D&C 60:2-4). It must have been reassuring to the exiles that despite their failings they were not rejected as his chosen people. The Lord made abundantly clear, however, why he had allowed them to be persecuted. They had polluted their inheritances with "jarrings, and contentions, and envyings, and strifes, and lustful and covetous desires among them. . . . They were slow to hearken unto the voice of the Lord their God. . . ." And, he added, "In the day of their peace they esteemed lightly my counsel" (D&C 101:6-8).

 

The Lord was careful to emphasize his approval of righteous individuals. He was pleased with the humble truth seekers and with the meek (D&C 97:1-2). He was "well pleased" with Parley P. Pratt, who with diligence and personal sacrifice had been directing a school of elders. fn Those who were honest and contrite and willing to observe their covenants by sacrifice were accepted of the Lord (D&C 97:8). Nevertheless, the Missouri Saints as a whole were not a people worthy of Zion: "Behold, here is wisdom concerning the children of Zion, even many, but not all; they were found transgressors, therefore they must needs be chastened" (D&C 101:41).

 

Zion Shall Be Redeemed

 

While Joseph Smith and Sidney Rigdon were on a mission in New York in October, 1833, their hearts were understandably turned to the troubles of the Saints in Zion. Was the center place to be lost to the mobs of the adversary? The Lord responded, "Zion shall be redeemed, although she is chastened for a little season" (D&C 100:13). It was perhaps to this comforting revelation that the Prophet referred in a letter addressed to the exiled Saints on 10 December 1833:

 

I cannot learn from any communication by the Spirit to me, that Zion has forfeited her claim to a celestial crown, notwithstanding the Lord has caused her to be thus afflicted, except it may be some individuals, who have walked in disobedience, and forsaken the new covenant; all such will be made manifest by their works in due time. I have always expected that Zion would suffer some affliction, from what I could learn from the commandments which have been given. But I would remind you of a certain clause in one which says, that after much tribulation cometh the blessing. By this, and also others, and also one received of late, I know that Zion, in the due time of the Lord, will be redeemed. fn

 

Section 101, dated six days after this letter, answered another significant question. "Zion shall not be moved out of her place, notwithstanding her children are scattered. They that remain, and are pure in heart, shall return, and come to their inheritances, they and their children, with songs of everlasting joy, to build up the waste places of Zion. . . . And, behold, there is none other place appointed than that which I have appointed . . . for the work of the gathering of my saints—Until the day cometh when there is found no more room for them; and then I have other places which I will appoint unto them, and they shall be called stakes, for the curtains of the strength of Zion" (D&C 101:17-18, 20-21).

 

Jackson County, therefore, was the gathering place. Its redemption was assured. However, it was not the Lord's intention to make clear yet when and how this was to be accomplished. His instructions on the matter in section 101 were all preliminary. First, the Saints were to continue to "gather together, and stand in holy places" (v. 22; cf. v. 64, note the plural in both cases). Second, the gathering was to be "according to the parable of the wheat and the tares" (v. 65). That is, the time of the final separation of the righteous from the wicked had not yet come. Third, the gathering was not to be done with haste, but the Saints were to let all things be prepared before [them]" (v. 68). Fourth, all available land in Jackson County and the surrounding counties was to be purchased by the Saints, including those in the churches of the east, and honorable and wise men were to be appointed to make these purchases (vv. 70-75). Fifth, the Saints were to continue to importune for redress according to the laws and constitution of the people (vv. 76-77).

 

A sixth recourse was foreshadowed in the Lord's parable concerning Zion (vv. 43-62), i.e., that Zion could be redeemed by an army of warriors from among the Lord's servants. fn For the time being, however, the Saints were to "renounce war and proclaim peace" (D&C 98:16). The Lord at this point retained for himself the responsibility for Zion's redemption, and he had sworn and decreed and given his promise with an immutable covenant that the Saints' prayers would be answered (D&C 98:2-3). Their responsibility, bitterly underscored by their trials, was to "forsake all evil and cleave unto all good" and to "live by every word which proceedeth forth out of the mouth of God" (D&C 98:11).

 

Forgive Others, That Your Father May Forgive You

 

The Missouri exiles needed answers for their normal and human questions about whether or not to retaliate against their enemies. The Lord's answers included principles that could refine them into a celestial people. At one point, he bluntly taught them that if they and their families did not bear their smitings patiently, their impatience itself would render their smitings just (D&C 98:24)! The Lord's laws of retaliation, war, and revenge in section 98 were ultimately laws of mercy, peace, and reconciliation. While allowing for justice, they encouraged forebearance, kindness, and love.

 

In several revelations the exiles were taught that concern for their physical well-being was secondary and that death for the Lord's cause brought the promise of life eternal: "Be not afraid of your enemies, for I have decreed in my heart, saith the Lord, that I will prove you in all things, whether you will abide in my covenant, even unto death, that you may be found worthy. For if ye will not abide in my covenant ye are not worthy of me" (D&C 98:14-15; cf. 98:18 and 101:15, 35-38).

 

The House of the Lord in Zion

 

The question of the building of the temple in Zion remained open at this point. fn The Lord intended his people to be chastened, and leaving them to grieve the loss of the privilege of building a house in which all the pure in heart could see God (D&C 97:16) was chastening indeed. Parley P. Pratt wrote that the revelation given in section 97, which included the command to build the Lord's house "speedily," "was not complied with by the leaders and Church in Missouri, as a whole; notwithstanding many were humble and faithful. Therefore, the threatened judgment was poured out to the uttermost, as the history of the five following years will show." fn

 

Conditions of the Heart

 

During the Missouri persecutions the Lord made the conditions of the heart a major focus of his counsel to his children. He commanded them to be pure, humble, hopeful, and obedient. They had gone to Jackson County to establish Zion, but "this is Zion—THE PURE IN HEART" (D&C 97:21). The Saints were law-abiding citizens, contrary to the rumors circulated by the mobs, fn but the Lord required more. In his words, "all among them who know their hearts are honest, and are broken, and their spirits contrite, and are willing to observe their covenants by sacrifice—yea, every sacrifice which I, the Lord, shall command—they are accepted of me" (D&C 97:8).

 

The Lord expressed his approval for those in Zion who were "truly humble and . . . seeking diligently to learn wisdom and to find truth" (D&C 97:1). Humility is a basic requirement for a proper relationship with the Lord. It is listed first among the requirements for baptism (D&C 20:37). It must accompany confession and repentance (D&C 20:6; 61:2). It is a key to receiving the blessings of prayer (D&C 112:10; 136:32), even to the rending of the veil (D&C 67:10). And humility is essential for those who would be gathered in the last days (D&C 29:1-2).

 

In the stark face of persecution, loss of property, and even the threat of death, the Lord counseled the Saints to have hope: "Fear not even unto death; for in this world your joy is not full, but in me your joy is full" (D&C 101:36). What godly perspective, compared to the reactions of the natural man! Neither anger nor self-pity were acceptable responses to the Lord's chastening. He was teaching his people to center their focus on him, not on their difficulties.

 

Zion can only be established among the obedient. So often has the Lord enjoined the principle of obedience in this dispensation that it may justifiably be called the central theme of his revelations and the first law of heaven: "And in nothing doth man offend God, or against none is his wrath kindled, save those who confess not his hand in all things, and obey not his commandments" (D&C 59:21). Obedience is the definition of a godly man. To be acceptable it must not be blind obedience, reluctant obedience, or forced obedience. Proper obedience is more than obeying. It is a condition of the heart. The Lord illustrated this in a commandment to Joseph Smith: "Prepare thy heart to receive and obey the instructions which I am about to give unto you" (D&C 132:3, italics added). Hearts unprepared to obey are not worthy before the Lord, and the lesson of proper obedience was crucial for this dispensation, in which Zion cannot fail. It was better that a few should suffer and perish than that a generation should defile the land of Zion by presuming to establish God's holy place in unworthiness.

 

Learning About God

 

The universal worth of the Doctrine and Covenants flows from the breadth of the Lord's perspective. Nineteenth-century events brought revelations of principle that retain significance far beyond their time. In his revelations, the Lord seemed to urge his people to look past the concern of the moment and learn the bigger lesson. For example, when the concern of the moment was a confrontation with lawlessness and mobocracy, the Lord taught in section 98 the value of electing honest and wise men to public office (vv. 9-10), the need for upholding and befriending the constitutional law of the land (vv. 4-7), and the need not just to proclaim peace in Missouri, but to "seek diligently to turn the hearts of the children to their fathers, and the hearts of the fathers to the children; And again, the hearts of the Jews unto the prophets, and the prophets unto the Jews; lest I come and smite the whole earth with a curse, and all flesh be consumed before me" (vv. 16-17). The Second Coming was repeatedly stressed by the Lord as the time of ultimate vengeance on the lawless and of reward for those who had suffered persecution and endured in faith (D&C 97:13-17; 101:23-35).

 

When the concern of the moment was the building of a temple that would not appear during the lifetime of any of the nineteenth-century Saints, the Lord taught the importance of all such holy places. Temples, he said, are places of thanksgiving, of instruction for those called to the ministry, and places suited for perfecting the Saints in their understanding of theory, principle, and doctrine pertaining to the kingdom of God on the earth (D&C 97:13-14). Furthermore, temples are places where his glory rests, where his presence dwells, and where the pure in heart that come may see him (D&C 97:15-16). The principle of guarding temples against being defiled by unclean things, lest the Lord's presence withdraw (D&C 97:15-17), is so significant that in our day it is to be discussed in every temple recommend interview.

 

After detailing the reasons for which he had suffered affliction to come upon the Saints in Jackson County, the Lord added, "Verily I say unto you, notwithstanding their sins, my bowels are filled with compassion towards them. I will not utterly cast them off; and in the day of wrath I will remember mercy" (D&C 101:9). To learn this balance of justice and mercy, wrath and love, is to learn about God. He would later teach about "reproving betimes with sharpness, when moved upon by the Holy Ghost; and then showing forth afterwards an increase of love toward him whom thou hast reproved, lest he esteem thee to be his enemy" (D&C 121:43). God is love, but he did not condone partial commitment or intermittent covenant-keeping. He did not mitigate deserved punishment. He spewed the lukewarm Saints out of the center place of Zion. Then, he taught them the depths of his compassion.

 

We do well to reassess constantly our standing before the Lord. If we are presumptuously arrogant about our chosenness or our righteousness, we may find his reminder of our real status surprisingly stern. Should we not be grateful that, as Alma taught his wayward son Corianton, "there was a time granted unto man to repent, yea, a probationary time, a time to repent and serve God" (Alma 42:4)?

 

To Those Who Return

 

In a much earlier dispensation, a people was rejected by the Lord as unworthy and unprepared to inherit a promised land. They were left to spend forty years in the wilderness. During that time they felt his wrath; they also experienced his love. They were exiles, yet the day came when he judged their children to be an acceptable generation, and through their prophet he gave them instructions to inherit the promised land.

 

In the due time of the Lord, a latter-day generation will be judged acceptable to establish the center place of Zion and build the temple there. They may well hear words from their prophet like those of Moses—counsel to those who return:

 

All the commandments which I command thee this day shall ye observe to do, that ye may live, and multiply, and go in and possess the land which the Lord sware unto your fathers.

 

And thou shalt remember all the way which the Lord thy God led thee these forty years in the wilderness, to humble thee, and to prove thee, to know what was in thine heart, whether thou wouldest keep his commandments, or no.

 

And he humbled thee, and suffered thee to hunger, and fed thee with manna, which thou knewest not, neither did thy fathers know; that he might make thee know that man doth not live by bread only, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of the Lord doth man live.

 

Thy raiment waxed not old upon thee, neither did thy foot swell, these forty years.

 

Thou shalt also consider in thine heart, that, as a man chasteneth his son, so the Lord thy God chasteneth thee.

 

Therefore thou shalt keep the commandments of the Lord thy God, to walk in his ways, and to fear him.

 

For the Lord thy God bringeth thee into a good land (Deut. 8:1-7).

 

Notes Counsel to the Exiles

 

1. HC 1:319.

 

2. See Monte S. Nyman, "The Redemption of Zion," found herein.

 

3. A reading of the whole psalm is instructive. The Savior similarly invoked an entire psalm with a phrase when he exclaimed on the cross, "My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?" See Matt. 27:46 and Ps. 22.

 

4. See Parley P. Pratt, Autobiography of Parley Parker Pratt (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1938), pp. 93-94.

 

5. HC 1:453-54.

 

6. See Richard D. Draper, "Maturing Toward the Millennium," found herein.

 

7. The Lord did not resolve this issue for his Saints until five years later in connection with a revelation on the Nauvoo Temple. See D&C 124:45-55, and Robert A. Cloward, "Revelations in Nauvoo," found herein.

 

8. Autobiography, p. 96.

 

9. Alexander Majors, son of a Missouri mobster reported: "There is nothing in the county records to show that a Mormon was ever charged with any misdemeanor in the way of violation of the laws," Alexander Majors, Seventy Years on the Frontier (Chicago and New York: Rand, McNally, and Co., 1893), pp. 49-50, cited in Ivan J. Barrett, Joseph Smith and the Restoration (Provo, Ut.: Brigham Young University Press, 1973), p. 240.

 

 

 

(Robert L. Millet and Kent P. Jackson, eds., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 1: The Doctrine and Covenants [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1989], 379.)

 

 

 

 

D&C 109

 

KIRTLAND TEMPLE

 

LORD COMMANDS TEMPLE BUILDING. It was only a few brief months after the organization of the Church when the doctrine of temple building and ceremonial ordinances therein was partly revealed. The saints were told that there should stand a sacred house of the Lord in Jackson County, Missouri.fn The site was selected and dedicated, but because of the hatred and open hostility of the people in that land, no temple was built there, although that day will come in the due time of the Lord.

 

The first temple erected in this dispensation was at Kirtland, Ohio. December 27, 1832, the Lord commanded that a house be built there, “even a house of prayer a house of fasting, a house of faith, a house of learning, a house of glory, a house of order, a house of God.”fn

 

KEYS AND ENDOWMENTS PROMISED SAINTS. It was further stated in the revelations that the Lord had keys and endowments to bestow upon his elders requiring the building of such a house. In December, 1830, the Lord gave commandment that the saints move their headquarters from the state of New York to “the Ohio.”fn One reason given for this change of location was that the Lord desired to give to the Church his law. Moreover, he desired to endow the elders of the Church.

 

The Lord said in a subsequent revelation given in January, 1831: Wherefore, for this cause I gave unto you the commandment that ye should go to the Ohio; and there I will give unto you my law; and there you shall be endowed with power from on high; And from thence, whosoever I will shall go forth among all nations, and it shall be told them what they shall do; for I have a great work laid up in store, for Israel shall be saved, and I will lead them whithersoever I will, and no power shall stay my hand.”fn

 

SAINTS COMMANDED TO BUILD KIRTLAND TEMPLE. In May, 1833, the Lord gave by revelation the dimensions of this house. It was to be “fifty-five by sixty-five feet in the width thereof and in the length thereof, in the inner court.” There were to be a lower court and an upper court, and the building was to be dedicated “from the foundation thereof,” according to the order of the priesthood.

 

The Lord also said: “And ye shall not suffer any unclean thing to come into it; and my glory shall be there, and my presence shall be there. But if there shall come into it any unclean thing, my glory shall not be there; and my presence shall not come into it.”

 

June 1, 1833, the Lord rebuked the saints for inactivity. The necessity for such a building was urgent and the Lord said: “For ye have sinned against me a very grievous sin, in that ye have not considered the great commandment in all things, that I have given unto you concerning the building of mine house.” And again he endeavored to impress upon the Church the necessity for such a building, for in it were to be given keys, “For the preparation wherewith I design to prepare mine apostles to prune my vineyard for the last time, that I may bring to pass my strange act, that I may pour out my Spirit upon all flesh.”fn

 

SAINTS BUILT KIRTLAND TEMPLE IN THEIR POVERTY. It is doubtful if the leading elders realized the importance of making haste and the urgent necessity for the bestowal of keys so that they could go forth with greater power to preach among the nations of the earth. Nevertheless, following this rebuke they went to with their might to complete the sanctuary. A building committee consisting of Reynolds Cahoon, Jared Carter, and Hyrum Smith was appointed, and these brethren proceeded at once to erect the temple.

 

June 5, 1833, George A. Smith hauled the first load of stone for the temple, and Hyrum Smith and Reynolds Cahoon commenced digging the trench for the walls and finished the same with their own hands. July 23, 1833, the same day that the saints were murderously driven from their homes in Jackson County, the corner stones of the temple were laid. The work progressed rapidly from that time on.

 

Be it remembered that the saints were at that time few in number and very poor, yet they were called upon to make almost super human efforts to erect a building to the name of the Lord, which was worthy of his name. In due course of time, the edifice was completed. The time for the dedication was set for the 27th day of March, 1836.

 

The dimensions of the temple were 80 by 59 feet and the walls 50 feet high. There was a tower 110 feet. The two main halls, “the lower and the upper courts,” were in keeping with the dimensions given in the revelation. The building had four vestries in front, and five rooms in the attic, which were used for school purposes and for the quorums of the priesthood.

 

At each end of the main auditorium there were four rows of pulpits one above another. At the east end the pulpits were for the Melchizedek Priesthood and at the west for the Aaronic. It was so constructed that veils or curtains could be lowered, thus dividing the auditorium into four compartments or rooms for special and separate services.

 

PENTECOSTAL MANIFESTATIONS IN KIRTLAND TEMPLE. At the dedication there were given to the saints some wonderful manifestations. The house was filled with heavenly beings, who were seen only by part of the congregation. Some had the privilege of a vision of the Savior. The spirit of prophecy rested upon a number of the leading brethren, and it was a feast of Pentecost to all who were assembled there.fn The prayer of dedication was given to the Prophet Joseph Smith by revelation and is found as section 109 in the Doctrine and Covenants.

 

While the temple at Kirtland was in course of construction and as soon as provisions would allow, sections of the building were used for class instruction and for other purposes. Ordinances were revealed, and important revelations pertaining to the restoration were given, before the temple was dedicated.

 

It was in December of 1833, that the patriarchal priesthood was revealed, and Joseph Smith, Senior, was ordained as the first patriarch in the Church. On this occasion the Prophet Joseph Smith said: “Blessed of the Lord is my father, . . . and blessed, also, is my mother, . . . and blessed, also, are my brothers and sisters, for they shall yet find redemption in the house of the Lord, and their offsprings shall be a blessing, a joy, and a comfort to them.”fn

 

This blessing, given by the Prophet to members of his father’s family, was indicative of the blessings which were in store for all who should receive covenants and obligations to salvation in this house of the Lord.

 

NATURE OF ENDOWMENT IN KIRTLAND TEMPLE. In January, 1836, over two months before the dedication, the first ceremonies of endowment were given in the temple. They were not as complete as are the ceremonies today, but nevertheless, it was the beginning of the revealing and bestowing of the heavenly blessings in this dispensation. Washings and anointings were given, and the Prophet saw wonderful visions of the celestial kingdom.fn . . .

 

The greater manifestations and endowment came, however, after the dedication of the temple. At that time all the elders who were out preaching the gospel were ordered to come to Kirtland to receive their endowment. The Lord said in June, 1834: “Verily I say unto you, it is expedient in me that the first elders of my church should receive their endowment from on high in my house, which I have commanded to be built unto my name in the land of Kirtland.”fn For this reason they were assembled at Kirtland at the dedication.

 

This prophetic utterance about the elders obtaining an endowment in the temple at Kirtland is of double meaning. First, there were to come from on high essential blessings for the saints, which up to that time had not been revealed. Second, the elders were to receive greater powers that they might be better qualified to teach. It was made known by many manifestations of divine power at the dedication that the temple had been accepted as the house of the Lord.

 

PURPOSE OF KIRTLAND TEMPLE. The Kirtland Temple holds a peculiar place in the annals of temple building. It is not like other temples. It was built primarily for the restoration of keys of authority. In the receiving of these keys the fulness of gospel ordinances is revealed. The keys of salvation and exaltation for both the living and the dead were given within its sacred walls. An endowment, such as was necessary at the time, was also given. This was not as complete as the endowment later revealed.

 

In the Kirtland Temple there was no provision made for the salvation of the dead. It had no baptismal font, for it was only a preparatory temple. It had no provision for the endowment ordinances which were later revealed. It was a temple, however, and fully answered the purpose of its creation.

 

The Kirtland Temple filled its mission shortly after the time of its dedication. The Lord revealed line upon line and precept upon precept in relation to the eternal exaltation of his children. When the knowledge in the fulness came, it was essential that other temples be erected with the facilities for that perfection which the Kirtland Temple lacked. The Nauvoo Temple was built according to the perfected pattern, as it was revealed to the Prophet Joseph Smith.

 

POLLUTION OF KIRTLAND TEMPLE. Like the Temple of Solomon and those which succeeded that grand structure in Jerusalem, the Kirtland Temple was polluted and ceased to be a sanctuary to the name of the Lord. Even today, if it had remained undefiled it could hardly be used for the performance of the essential ordinances which are received in temples, for it was not built for them.

 

Though its day as a sacred and holy house of God was short, yet that day was glorious while it lasted. In it the Savior appeared and the keys of dispensations were revealed, in preparation for the complete salvation and exaltation of all who will receive the truth.fn

 

Today that temple stands in the place of an ordinary meetinghouse and in the hands of those who know little, if anything, of the sacred ordinances for which temples are built.fn

 

It is not a sacred temple today-not by any means. It is no more a temple than an adobe building, and is not recognized by the Lord any more. It filled the measure of its creation, then fell into the hands of wicked men, and the Lord ceased to consider that building as a house built unto his name, and in the 124th section of the Doctrine and Covenants he says so.fn

 

 

(Joseph Fielding Smith, Doctrines of Salvation, 3 vols., edited by Bruce R. McConkie [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1954-1956], 2: 257.)

 

 

Joseph Smith had begun introducing parts of the endowment before this time March, 27, 1836.

 

April 3, 1836 – D&C 110 was given after Sacrament meeting.

 

Oliver Cowdery was a 2nd witness to these visions and the keys received, he was not a member of the 1st Presidency or a member of the Quorum of the 12, and the 12 were struggling at this time, personal apostasy in its ranks.

 

Dedicatory prayer for the Kirtland Temple was patterned after the prayer given by Solomon

 

 1 Kings 8:22-54.

 

Solomon mentions there is no other God that makes covenants with his people and keeps them.

 

God would have one of David’s descendants carry on after him.

 

God is the God of the entire universe.

 

This temple is a house of prayer unto God.  Solomon prayer seeks the Lord’s forgiveness, when Israel has sinned, may the Lord forgive them (us) and bring them back to the land of their inheritance.

 

Solomon prayed with his hands spread forth, signifying clean hands and a pure heart.

 

Coming back to the temple to become reconciled with God, Critical for our salvation

 

D&C 109

 

This prayer came to Joseph through revelation and inspiration after much preparation and study.

 

Temple dedicatory prayers are written in advance and are specific for each temple.

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 50:29-30.)

 

29 And if ye are purified and cleansed from all sin, ye shall ask whatsoever you will in the name of Jesus and it shall be done.

 

30 But know this, it shall be given you what you shall ask; and as ye are appointed to the head, the spirits shall be subject unto you.

 

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 109:1-5.) – God makes and keeps covenants with His people

 

1 Thanks be to thy name, O Lord God of Israel, who keepest covenant and showest mercy unto thy servants who walk uprightly before thee, with all their hearts—

 

2 Thou who hast commanded thy servants to build a house to thy name in this place [Kirtland].

 

3 And now thou beholdest, O Lord, that thy servants have done according to thy commandment.

 

4 And now we ask thee, Holy Father, in the name of Jesus Christ, the Son of thy bosom, in whose name alone salvation can be administered to the children of men, we ask thee, O Lord, to accept of this house, the workmanship of the hands of us, thy servants, which thou didst command us to build.

 

5 For thou knowest that we have done this work through great tribulation; and out of our poverty we have given of our substance to build a house to thy name, that the Son of Man might have a place to manifest himself to his people.

 

Church Handbook of Instruction – Dedicating Homes, importance of this in our homes.

 

Kirtland Temple is unique from any other temple built in this dispensation; there are no ordinance rooms here.

 

3 Different ways:

 

  1. Unique interior design
  2. 3 levels without a central meeting room
  3. Windows are all the way around, especially right behind the altar

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 109:15.)

 

15 And that they may grow up in thee, and receive a fulness of the Holy Ghost, and be organized according to thy laws, and be prepared to obtain every needful thing;

 

 

There is a need to attend the temple, temples are for us to grow up in God, ward meeting house helps us prepare for the temple and receive the fulness of the Holy Ghost.

 

Participating in the temple helps control our thoughts, it is a house of learning and spirituality to work on the inner man.

 

Temple Questions

 

1-3 – Our relationship with God and the Church

 

Next concerns our relationship with Church leaders and our conduct with ourselves and others.

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 109:20.)

 

20 And that no unclean thing shall be permitted to come into thy house to pollute it;

 

 

We are working on perfection and not committing sins unto spiritual death, answer all of the temple questions, if not then we are unclean.

 

 

Temple questions cover 3 areas:

 

 

  1. Relationship with God, Church, and Priesthood leaders
  2. Conduct
  3. Relationship with the Temple, keeping covenants

 

Worthiness means you are trying to become perfect, the temple helps in this perfection.

 

Church = High School

 

College = Temple

 

Graduation = Becoming like God

                      It isn’t enough to simply be with God

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 109:21-22.)

 

21 And when thy people transgress, any of them, they may speedily repent and return unto thee, and find favor in thy sight, and be restored to the blessings which thou hast ordained to be poured out upon those who shall reverence thee in thy house.

 

22 And we ask thee, Holy Father, that thy servants may go forth from this house armed with thy power, and that thy name may be upon them, and thy glory be round about them, and thine angels have charge over them;

 

“SPEEDILY REPENT”

 

At all costs, we must not be apathetic to the temple or treat our covenants lightly. If we are now unworthy, we must not let years go by before we return. The Lord knew that some people would fail to maintain their temple worthiness through the temptations and weaknesses of human nature. But we are not so much condemned for our mistakes and sins as we are for our failure to cease doing them. In terms of temple covenants, the condemnation comes for not correcting our faults so that we can return to the temple. Worthiness and the desire to return to the temple are often the best signs we have that our repentance has been complete and is accepted by the Lord. Then we must forgive ourselves, continue with our lives, and remain temple worthy.

 

Even the dedicatory prayer of the Kirtland Temple refers to these things: “When thy people transgress, any of them, they may speedily repent and return unto thee, and find favor in thy sight, and be restored to the blessings which thou hast ordained to be poured out upon those who shall reverence thee in thy house.” (D&C 109:21.) The invitation to come to the Lord’s house is always extended. “I have set before thee an open door,” Jesus said, “and no man can shut it.” (Revelation 3:8.) Only our own refusal to enter that door will permanently keep us out of the Lord’s kingdom.

 

 

(S. Michael Wilcox, House of Glory: Finding Personal Meaning in the Temple [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1995], 79.)

 

 

Rudger Clawson: 21

 

D&C 109 21When thy people transgress . . . they may speedily repent

 

Consider, for a moment, the great law of repentance. It is binding upon this Church. We must consider it and meet its requirements. It must have an influence in our daily lives. God has said that He cannot look upon sin with the least degree of allowance. [Sec. 1:31.] Hear it, O Israel! It cannot be condoned, it cannot be excused, it cannot be winked at, because confronting sin is this great and eternal law of repentance. If we will have absolution, if we will have forgiveness of sin, we must submit to the law and repent. I say—no, I do not say it—it is declared in the Gospel which we have received, that no man or woman can be saved in the kingdom of God except by faith and repentance. [Sec. 19:31.] Salvation cannot be purchased. It is a free gift of God, and it comes through His Gospel. And in this matter, as in all things, God is no respector of persons. He who sins in this Church, be it a small or a great transgression, must repent. It matters not in whom the sin may be found. In the President of the Church? Yes. In his Counselors? Yes. In the Twelve Apostles? Yes. The Presidents of the Stakes, the Bishops of Wards, and the leaders of Zion? Yes. In the lay members of the Church? Yes. It affects the most influential as well as the humblest in the Church. When children come to years of understanding and accountability, must they repent and forsake sin? Yes. [Sec. 68:25-29.] Those who do not repent, those who do not yield obedience to this great and immutable law of the Gospel, will go into spiritual darkness and, peradventure, will lose the faith. [Sec. 63:16.] (CR, October 1904, p. 36.)

 

 

(Roy W. Doxey, comp., Latter-day Prophets and the Doctrine and Covenants [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1978], 4: 80.)

 

 

John A. Widtsoe: 22

 

D&C 109 22Thine angels have charge over them

 

Undoubtedly angels often guard us from accidents and harm, from temptation and sin. They may properly be spoken of as guardian angels. Many people have borne and may bear testimony to the guidance and protection that they have received from sources beyond their natural vision. Without the help that we receive from the constant presence of the Holy Spirit, and from possibly holy angels, the difficulties of life would be greatly multiplied.

 

The common belief, however, that to every person born into the world is assigned a guardian angel to be with that person constantly, is not supported by available evidence. It is a very comforting thought, but at present without proof of its correctness. An angel may be a guardian angel though he comes only as assigned to give us special help. In fact, the constant presence of the Holy Spirit would seem to make such a constant, angelic companionship unnecessary.

 

So, until further knowledge is obtained, we may say that angels may be sent to guard us according to our need; but we cannot say with certainty. (Gospel Interpretations, 1947, pp. 28-29.)

 

 

(Roy W. Doxey, comp., Latter-day Prophets and the Doctrine and Covenants [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1978], 4: 81.)

 

 

D&C 109:54-59 – Ask for God’s mercy on the nations of the world, Israel has been scattered throughout the world.  We should pray for unity in the world.  Israel is recovered by extending the stakes of Zion.

 

The purpose of the church is to gather Israel; Ephraim has the responsibility to gather in preparation of the Lord’s 2nd coming and the Millennium...

 

D&C 133:4, 9 – Israel is mixed with the Gentiles, our mission is to find them. Come to Zion.

 

 

 

 

D&C 110, 121, 124, and 132

 

 

D&C 110

 

Elijah – Calling and Election made sure, (there is an ordinance attached with this), sealing power to a higher level, an eternal sealing

 

Elias – Marriage ordinance, (Baptism, Holy Ghost, Washing and Anointing, Endowment, Marriage)

 

Moses – Gathering of the House of Israel

 

Messiah – The 2nd Comforter

 

Elias >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Elijah >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Messiah

 

Ordinances for Everlasting Covenant           Calling & Election                                      2nd Comforter

 

 

The Prophet has explained in his teachings the differences in the missions of Elias, Elijah, and Messiah.

 

The spirit of Elias is first, Elijah second, and Messiah last. Elias is a forerunner to prepare the way, and the spirit and power of Elijah is to come after, holding the keys of power, building the Temple to the capstone, placing the seals of the Melchizedek Priesthood upon the house of Israel, and making all things ready; then Messiah comes to His Temple, which is last of all.

 

Messiah is above the spirit and power of Elijah, for He made the world, and was that spiritual rock unto Moses in the wilderness. . . . (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p. 340

 

 

(Joseph Fielding Smith, Answers to Gospel Questions, 5 vols. [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1957-1966], 4: 194.)

 

 

All three of these offices—Elias, Elijah, and Messiah—were represented in the Kirtland Temple on April 3, 1836, when keys pertaining to these three priesthoods were restored to Joseph Smith. (D&C 110.) Messiah personifies the Melchizedek Priesthood, Elijah the patriarchal priesthood and Elias the Aaronic Priesthood. And yet each of these individuals is a high priest after the order of Melchizedek. Their positions differ in the authority of the keys they restored. Elijah himself, be it noted, held the keys of the Melchizedek Priesthood also, but as with all presidents of the Church, it was under the power and direction of Messiah or Jesus Christ.

(John A. Tvedtnes, The Church of the Old Testament [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1980], 35.)

 

The Restoration of Keys

 

Joseph Smith received both the Aaronic and the Melchizedek Priesthoods some months before the Church was organized. With those priesthoods, he also received the keys—the right to preside in them and to pass them on to others. But those were not the only keys the Prophet would receive. In due time, the Restoration brought back to earth other keys, which empowered him and his successors to carry on specific priesthood responsibilities.

 

In December 1830, only eight months after the organization of the Church, the Lord instructed his Saints in New York to migrate to Ohio (D&C 37:3). “There I will give unto you my law,” he said, “and there you shall be endowed with power from on high” (D&C 38:31-32). The law that they received in Ohio was section 42 of the Doctrine and Covenants, which revealed information on Church government, moral behavior, the establishment of Zion, and the law of consecration.

 

The endowment “with power from on high” began to come a few years later when the Kirtland Temple was built. On 3 April 1836, Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery, the president and assistant president of the Church, were praying in the newly dedicated Kirtland Temple. The Prophet reported, “The veil was taken from our minds, and the eyes of our understanding were opened” (D&C 110:1). Jesus Christ came to acknowledge and receive his holy house (D&C 110:9D&C 110:2-10). Then three others appeared in succession—Moses, Elias, and Elijah—each bringing spiritual blessings to the Church. Fn

 

Moses and the Gathering of Israel

 

Joseph Smith recorded the coming of Moses: “The heavens were again opened unto us; and Moses appeared before us, and committed unto us the keys of the gathering of Israel from the four parts of the earth, and the leading of the ten tribes from the land of the north” (D&C 110:11). Moses’ earthly career was a mission of great importance to the house of Israel. Through his service, God made a people out of the spiritually scattered and lost Israelites, restored to them the knowledge of who they were, delivered them from bondage, revealed a law to them, established their government under priesthood and prophetic authority, bound them to him under sacred covenants, and set them on a course that would lead them to their promised land.

 

All of those blessings constituted the gathering and the restoration of Israel. Moses was the bearer of the keys associated with those events, and his name will be forever associated with that mission. It is fitting that as part of the latter-day restoration of the gospel, he conferred them on his modern counterpart Joseph Smith, whose calling was to continue that work in our time.

 

It is not difficult to see close parallels between the mission of Moses and that of Joseph Smith (JST, Gen. 50:24-36). Through the work of Joseph Smith, God would make a people out of those who were spiritually scattered and lost, restore to them the knowledge of who they were, deliver them from spiritual bondage, reveal a law to them, establish their government under priesthood and prophetic authority, bind them to him under sacred covenants, and set them on a course that would lead to the establishment of Zion. In the work of Joseph Smith and his successors, we see the fruit of the keys that were restored by Moses.

 

Moses’ keys are the keys of missionary work for Israel but also for those whom the scriptures call the Gentiles, who become members of the covenant family when they accept the gospel. The mission of the Church in the latter days, assisted by the keys that Moses restored, is to all: “The voice of warning shall be unto all people, by the mouths of my disciples, whom I have chosen in these last days. And they shall go forth and none shall stay them, for I the Lord have commanded them” (D&C 1:4-5).

 

Missionary work had been underway since the beginning of the Restoration. Moses’ keys put the seal on that labor and enabled the work of gathering to continue at an even greater pace. A year after he appeared, the restored gospel was taken for the first time to countries outside North America, resulting ultimately in the conversion of thousands. The gathering to the covenants of the gospel has continued since the days of Joseph Smith. The millions who are now members of the Lord’s Church are testimony to the power of the keys that Moses restored.

 

Elias and the Abrahamic Covenant

 

After Moses departed from Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery, “Elias appeared, and committed the dispensation of the gospel of Abraham, saying that in us and our seed all generations after us should be blessed” (D&C 110:12). Though the identity of the messenger is not clear, the nature of his keys seems to be more certain. Elias brought to the Church “the dispensation of the gospel of Abraham.” The words “in us and our seed all generations after us should be blessed” are reminiscent of biblical promises pertaining to God’s covenant with the ancient Patriarchs (e.g., Gen. 22:18) and reflect the promises that were revealed in the book of Abraham only months before Elias’s coming (Abr. 2:9-11). It appears, then, that the messenger Elias restored keys pertaining to the covenant of Abraham, keys through which worthy men and women join in that covenant to create eternal family units.

 

Faithful Saints, by virtue of those keys, are married not only for time but also for eternity. Their children are sealed to them, as they are to their faithful ancestors before them (D&C 132:19-20, 30-31). In ways that have not been revealed, their exaltation brings them “a continuation of the seeds forever and ever” that will “continue as innumerable as the stars” (D&C 132:19, 30). Fn

 

Because the name Elias is often used in scripture as a title to represent a forerunner—a messenger who goes ahead to prepare the way for a greater revelation—we do not know if the name is used as a title of the messenger in this manifestation, or if the angelic visitor who appeared in the Kirtland Temple was a man by that name. Perhaps the Elias who restored the keys of the Abrahamic covenant was Abraham himself, or a contemporary of Abraham, or someone of his lineage who held the keys.

 

Elijah and the Sealing Keys

 

The final angelic key holder who appeared to Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery on that occasion was Elijah. He said: “Behold, the time has fully come, which was spoken of by the mouth of Malachi—testifying that he [Elijah] should be sent, before the great and dreadful day of the Lord come—to turn the hearts of the fathers to the children, and the children to the fathers, lest the whole earth be smitten with a curse—therefore, the keys of this dispensation are committed into your hands; and by this ye may know that the great and dreadful day of the Lord is near, even at the doors” (D&C 110:14-16).

 

This was not the first time Joseph Smith had been instructed concerning the mission of Elijah. When Moroni appeared to him on 21-22 September 1823, Moroni taught him by quoting Malachi 4:5-6, which foretells Elijah’s coming (JS-H 1:38-39; D&C 2:1-3). Moroni’s version changes the verses from those in the Bible to emphasize Elijah as a restorer of priesthood power. The resurrected Christ quoted the same verses to Lehi’s children (3 Ne. 25:5-6), and Joseph Smith discussed them on several occasions. Fn

 

Elijah restored the keys of the sealing power. Fn Most often we consider this power in the context of the redemptive work for the dead and the “welding link” that temple work creates “between the fathers and the children” (D&C 128:18; see also 17). According to Joseph Smith, Elijah’s keys “turn the hearts of the children to the covenant made with their fathers,” fn they “reveal the covenants of the fathers to the children and of the children to the fathers, that they may enter into covenant with each other,” fn and they “seal the hearts of the fathers to the children—and the children to the parents.” Fn

 

But Elijah’s keys do even more; they seal and validate all ordinances of the priesthood so that ordinances performed on earth are binding in heaven as well. Joseph Smith taught: “Elijah was the last prophet that held the keys of this priesthood, and who will, before the last dispensation, restore the authority and deliver the keys of this priesthood in order that all the ordinances may be attended to in righteousness. . . . Why send Elijah? Because he holds the keys of the authority to administer in all the ordinances of the priesthood. And without the authority is given, the ordinances could not be administered in righteousness.” Fn Moreover, “the spirit, power, and calling of Elijah is that ye have power to hold the keys of the revelations, ordinances, oracles, powers, and endowments of the fulness of the Melchizedek Priesthood and of the kingdom of God on the earth, and to receive, obtain, and perform all the ordinances belonging to the kingdom of God.” Fn

 

The appearance of Moses, Elias, and Elijah in the Kirtland Temple repeated in many ways the similar event that the ancient apostles Peter, James, and John experienced, as recorded in the New Testament (Matt. 17:1-9). At that time, as in 1836, the Lord was beginning a new dispensation of his Church, and ancient holders of priesthood power came to pass on the keys of their ministry to enable the Lord’s work to be carried forward. In the latter days, this transmittal of keys was an indispensable step in the process of the Restoration.

 

Keys, Honors, Majesty, and Glory

 

Because the Prophet Joseph Smith was very circumspect regarding spiritual events, we are not privileged to know everything he knew and experienced. We know, however, that other ancient prophets appeared to him and conveyed to him the keys of their callings so the Church in our day would be able to fulfill its divinely appointed role: “Now, what do we hear in the gospel which we have received? A voice of gladness! A voice of mercy from heaven; and a voice of truth out of the earth; glad tidings for the dead; a voice of gladness for the living and the dead; glad tidings of great joy. . . . And the voice of Michael, the archangel; the voice of Gabriel, and of Raphael, and of divers angels, from Michael or Adam down to the present time, all declaring their dispensation, their rights, their keys, their honors, their majesty and glory, and the power of their priesthood” (D&C 128:19, 21).

 

The Restoration would be comprehensive, because in this, the final dispensation of the gospel, “all things which are in Christ Jesus, whether in heaven or on the earth, shall be gathered together in him, and . . . all things shall be restored, as spoken of by all the holy prophets since the world began: for in it will take place the glorious fulfillment of the promises made to the fathers, while the displays of the power of the Most High will be great, glorious, and sublime.” Fn

 

In the spring of 1844, a few weeks before his death, Joseph Smith passed on the keys that he had received to the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles. President Wilford Woodruff, who was there, remembered the Prophet’s words as follows: “I have sealed upon your heads all the keys of the kingdom of God. I have sealed upon you every key, power, principle that the God of heaven has revealed to me. Now, no matter where I may go or what I may do, the kingdom rests upon you. . . . But, ye apostles of the Lamb of God, my brethren, upon your shoulders this kingdom rests; now you have got to round up your shoulders and bear off the kingdom.” Fn

 

“Said he, during that period, ‘I now rejoice. I have lived until I have seen this burden, which has rested on my shoulders, rolled on to the shoulders of other men; now the keys of the kingdom are planted on the earth to be taken away no more for ever.’ But until he had done this, they remained with him; and had he been taken away they would have had to be restored by messengers out of heaven. But he lived until every key, power and principle of the holy Priesthood was sealed on the Twelve and on President Young, as their President.” Fn

 

Fully empowered with all the keys of the priesthood, the Twelve were able to go forward in the work that God had begun through Joseph Smith. Though all who have been ordained to the Quorum of the Twelve bear all the keys, they are fully activated in the person of the senior apostle, who is the president of the Church. As new members of the Twelve are called, they receive those same keys, and thus the Lord’s power is continued in his Church in the fifteen men who compose the First Presidency and the Quorum of the Twelve. The latter-day Church has never been without the keys since they were first restored.

 

Notes

 

1. For a review of the events that led up to these manifestations, see Milton V. Backman Jr., The Heavens Resound: A History of the Latter-day Saints in Ohio, 1830-1838 (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1983), 284-308.

 

2. These blessings are discussed in Chapter 22, 230-34.

 

3. Joseph Smith, Joseph Smith’s Commentary on the Bible, comp. and ed. Kent P. Jackson (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1994), 69-74.

 

4. See Charles R. Harrell, “Turning the Hearts of the Fathers and the Children,” in Robert L. Millet and Kent P. Jackson, eds., The Doctrine and Covenants, Studies in Scripture Series, vol. 1 (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1989), 57-63.

 

5. Andrew F. Ehat and Lyndon W. Cook, eds., The Words of Joseph Smith: The Contemporary Accounts of the Nauvoo Discourses of the Prophet Joseph (Provo, Utah: Religious Studies Center, Brigham Young University, 1980), 242; emphasis added.

 

6. Ibid., 241; emphasis added.

 

7. Ibid., 336; emphasis added.

 

8. Ibid., 43.

 

9. Ibid., 329.

 

10. Times and Seasons 1, no. 12 (October 1840): 178.

 

11. Millennial Star 51 (1889): 546-47; see also Times and Seasons 5, no. 20 (1 November 1844): 698-70.

 

12. In Journal of Discourses, 26 vols. (London: Latter-day Saints’ Book Depot, 1855-86), 13:164 (12 December 1869).

 

 

(Kent P. Jackson, From Apostasy to Restoration [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1996], 216.)

 

 

The Keys of the Priesthood Restored

 

Approximately six months before his death, Jesus spoke with his disciples at Caesarea Philippi. It was on that occasion that the chief apostle, in response to the Lord's query, declared: "Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God." Simon was commended for his testimony and assured that such a witness had come from a divine source. "And I say also unto thee," the Master continued, "that thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven" (Matt. 16:13-19). Within a period of about one week, the Lord's promise was fulfilled. The New Testament Gospels record that Jesus took with him Peter, James, and John—the chief apostles of the church—to a high mountain to pray. While in that setting, these four were transfigured—lifted spiritually to a higher plane—and thus made ready for a transcendent experience.

 

Moses and Elijah appeared and bestowed upon the meridian apostolic presidency the keys of the kingdom of heaven. fn Keys are directing powers, the right of presidency. These rights would allow the apostles to govern and direct the church in the absence of Jesus Christ, and to make available to the Saints all the powers and blessings of the everlasting gospel. Peter, James, and John had received the Melchizedek Priesthood years earlier and had been given apostolic power and commission at the time of their appointment to the Twelve. Now, however, they had further rights and additional directional responsibilities to bind and seal on earth, that their actions might likewise receive sealing validity in the heavens.

 

That which transpired in the first century in Palestine was a pattern for the marvelous happenings in Kirtland, Ohio in the nineteenth century. The winter and spring of 1836 proved to be an era of both modern pentecost and modern transfiguration.

 

By early April bearers of the priesthood had received their washings and anointings, including participating in the ordinance of the washing of feet; they had therefore received a partial endowment. Shortly thereafter, Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery knelt in prayer behind drawn curtains adjacent to the large pulpits on the west side of the main floor of the temple. The date was Sunday, 3 April 1836, exactly one week following the dedication of the Lord's House. During the morning hours Elder Thomas B. Marsh (then president of the Twelve) and Elder David W. Patten (also an apostle) spoke to the Saints. In the afternoon the Presidency and the apostles participated in administering and passing the sacrament, after which Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery commenced praying privately. At that moment these two men participated in one of the most important visions of the ages. fn Although temple work as we know it today was not performed in our first temple (members received only a partial endowment at that time), the keys to engage in temple work were unfolded in that House of the Lord (D&C 1 10). One of the main purposes for the construction of that building was realized on that occasion. Saints who had sacrificed for three years were recipients of one of the most rewarding visions of all time. And the blessings that flowed from that temple "have given literally millions of people great cause to rejoice." fn

 

The Savior Appears

 

As Jesus and his three Galilean apostles were transfigured anciently, so also were Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery—"apostles, and especial witnesses" of the name of Christ (D&C 27:12)—transformed and made ready to see within the veil and receive divine direction and authority. Appropriately, Jesus the Lord appeared first. In ancient days Jehovah had chosen frequently to make his presence known and manifest his glory through a cloud which rested upon his temple. In modern times Jehovah came again to his temple—the first one worthy of his presence in many centuries—and in power and great glory (cf. Exod. 24:9-10; Rev. 1:14-15) accepted the offering of his people. This appearance was a realization of the promise given in 1833: "And inasmuch as my people build a house unto me in the name of the Lord, and do not suffer any unclean thing to come into it, that it be not defiled, my glory shall rest upon it; Yea, and my presence shall be there, for I will come into it, and all the pure in heart that shall come into it shall see God" (D&C 97:15-16).

 

After announcing that Joseph and Oliver were cleansed from sin, the Lord encouraged the brethren to rejoice in the occasion and to broaden their vision as to the importance of the Kirtland Temple: "Yea the hearts of thousands and tens of thousands shall greatly rejoice in consequence of the blessings which shall be poured out, and the endowment with which my servants have been endowed in this house." Even though the Kirtland temple ceremonies were only a partial endowment (the full endowment would be revealed to the Prophet in Nauvoo in 1842), the keys and powers which were received on 3 April 1836 affect time and the eternities.

 

Moses and the Gathering

 

Joseph Smith recorded: "After this vision closed, the heavens were again opened unto us; and Moses appeared before us, and committed unto us the keys of the gathering of Israel from the four parts of the earth, and the leading of the ten tribes from the land of the north." The keys or directing power restored by the ancient lawgiver enabled the Saints to accomplish the divine directive delivered in September of 1830: "And ye are called to bring to pass the gathering of mine elect; for mine elect hear my voice and harden not their hearts" (D&C 29:7). To the President of the Church—the man appointed "to preside over the whole church, and to be like unto Moses" (D&C 107:91)—were given keys to gather modern Israel. Even as Moses held keys to lead ancient Israel out of Egyptian bondage, so the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints was given keys to call and lead modern Israel out of the bondage of today's world. "These keys empower those who hold them to lead all Israel, the ten tribes included, from all the nations of the earth, coming as the prophetic word affirms, one by one and two by two, to the mountains of the Lord's houses, there to be endowed with power from on high." fn

 

People are gathered first spiritually and then temporally. They are gathered first as they accept the true Messiah and are thus "restored to the true church and fold of God" (2 Ne. 9:2); secondly, they are gathered as they go where the Saints of God congregate. In the early days of the restored Church, for example, a convert evidenced his devotion to the faith first by baptism and then by relocating with the "body of Christ," be that in Ohio, Missouri, Illinois, or the Great Basin. It is clear, however, that as early as 1833 the Prophet Joseph understood that the time would come when the concept of gathering would expand, a day "when there is found no more room for them [i.e., when the areas of Missouri or even Utah would no longer be the sole places of gathering]; and then I have other places which I will appoint unto them, and they shall be called stakes, for the curtains or the strength of Zion" (D&C 101:21). By the end of the nineteenth century Saints were told to remain in their native lands and thus to build up the stakes of Zion in all the earth. In August of 1972 Elder Bruce R. McConkie explained to the Saints of Mexico and Central America: "This gathering has commenced and shall continue until the righteous are assembled into the congregations of the Saints in all the nations of the earth." And then, becoming more specific, Elder McConkie added: "The place of gathering for the Mexican Saints is Mexico; the place of gathering for the Brazilian, Brazil; and so it goes throughout the length and breadth of the whole earth. Japan is for the Japanese; Korea is for the Koreans; Australia is for the Australians; every nation is the gathering place for its own people." fn

 

Only through the establishment and strengthening of stakes throughout the world could the full concept of Zion be realized; only then could the Lord make it possible for the blessings of the temple to be had universally. Joseph Smith taught: "The main object [of gathering] was to build unto the Lord a house whereby He could reveal unto His people the ordinances of His house and the glories of His Kingdom, and teach the people the way of salvation." fn

 

Elias and the Patriarchal Order

 

"After this, Elias appeared, and committed the dispensation of the gospel of Abraham, saying that in us and our seed all generations after us should be blessed." The identity of Elias—whether he be Noah, fn Abraham himself, or a prophet named Elias from the days of Abraham fn—is not clearly known. This heavenly messenger restored the keys necessary to establish the ancient patriarchal order, making Joseph Smith and all those who receive celestial marriage through the temple heirs of the blessings and "promises of the fathers"—Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. fn The promises to Joseph Smith (and all worthy Latter-day Saints after him) are glorious. The Lord said: "And as I said unto Abraham concerning the kindreds of the earth, even so I say unto my servant Joseph: In thee and in thy seed shall the kindred of the earth be blessed" (D&C 124:58). In addition:

 

Abraham received promises concerning his seed, and of the fruit of his loins—from whose loins ye are, namely, my servant Joseph—which were to continue so long as they were in the world; and as touching Abraham and his seed, out of the world they should continue; both in the world and out of the world should they continue as innumerable as the stars. . . . This promise is yours also, because ye are of Abraham, and the promise was made unto Abraham; and by this law [of eternal marriage] is the continuation of the works of my Father, wherein he glorifieth himself. Go ye, therefore, and do the works of Abraham; enter ye into my law and ye shall be saved (D&C 132:30-32).

 

Elias thus returned and delivered that directing power through which eternal family units may be organized and perpetuated through the new and everlasting covenant of marriage. A modern apostle, Elder Bruce R. McConkie, has written:

 

As the crowning cause for wonderment, that God who is no respector of persons has given a like promise [to that of Abraham and Joseph Smith] to every [member] in the kingdom who has gone to the holy temple and entered into the blessed order of matrimony there performed. Every person married in the temple for time and for all eternity has sealed upon him, conditioned upon his faithfulness, all of the blessings of the ancient patriarchs, including the crowning promise and assurance of eternal increase, which means, literally, a posterity as numerous as the dust particles of the earth. fn

 

Elijah and the Sealing Power

 

The Prophet Joseph wrote concerning the final heavenly ministrant on this occasion: "After this vision had closed, another great and glorious vision burst upon us; for Elijah the prophet, who was taken to heaven without tasting death, stood before us, and said: Behold, the time has fully come, which was spoken of by the mouth of Malachi—testifying that he [Elijah] should be sent, before the great and dreadful day of the Lord come—to turn the hearts of the fathers to the children, and the children to the fathers, lest the whole earth be smitten with a curse." Precisely on the day that Elijah's appearance took place, Jews throughout the world were engaged in the celebration of the Passover, the annual commemoration of the day over three thousand years before when the angel of death had passed over the firstborn of Israel whose dwellings were marked by the blood of lambs. Since the time of Malachi—from about 500 B.C.—Jews world-wide waited with anxious anticipation for the coming of Elijah. Alfred Edersheim has written: "Hence to this day, in every Jewish home [which formally celebrates the Paschal feast], at a certain part of the Paschal service—just after the 'third cup,' or the 'cup of blessing,' has been drunk—the door is opened to admit Elijah the prophet." fn Elijah did come, but not to Jewish homes. He came rather to the house of the Lord, and to his legal administrators; there he bestowed priesthood keys of inestimable worth and eternal import.

 

When Moroni appeared to Joseph Smith in 1823 he quoted numerous passages from the Old and New Testaments. The Prophet indicated that he quoted Mal. 4:5-6 but gave a different rendering from that of the King James text. The prophecy began: "Behold, I will reveal unto you the priesthood, by the hand of Elijah the prophet, before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the Lord" (D&C 2:1). Joseph and Oliver had been ordained to the Melchizedek Priesthood and given apostolic power and commission as early as 1829. How was it, then, that Elijah would reveal the Priesthood? Elijah was sent to restore keys—directing powers—of the patriarchal order of priesthood, rights which had not been fully operational in this dispensation. Elijah restored the keys whereby families (organized in the patriarchal order through the keys delivered by Elias) could be bound and sealed for eternity.

 

Three months before his death, Joseph Smith instructed the Latter-day Saints concerning the mission of Elijah: "The spirit, power, and calling of Elijah is that ye have power to hold the key of the revelations, ordinances, oracles, powers and endowments of the fulness of the Melchizedek Priesthood and of the kingdom of God on the earth." fn Elijah restored the keys whereby individuals and families may (through the blessings of the holy temple) develop line upon line to the point where they receive the "fulness of the priesthood," and thus become kings and priests, queens and priestesses unto God in the patriarchal order. "Those holding the fulness of the Melchizedek Priesthood," Joseph had taught earlier, "are kings and priests of the Most High God, holding the keys of power and blessings." fn Through the powers delivered by Elias (via the marriage discipline of the Fathers—Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob) eternal family units—here and hereafter—are created. Through the powers delivered by Elijah, families may be sealed unto eternal life, inasmuch as "the power of Elijah is sufficient to make our calling and election sure." fn

 

Because Elijah came, all other ordinances for the living and the dead (e.g., baptisms, confirmations, ordinations, etc.) have real meaning and are thus of efficacy, virtue, and force in eternity. fn The ordinances associated with the ministry of Elijah (centering in the temples) are the "capstone blessings" of the gospel and the consummation of the work of the Church; they provide purpose and perspective for all other sacred activities.

 

Elijah came to "plant in the hearts of the children the promises made to the fathers" whereby the "hearts of the children [should] turn to their fathers" (D&C 2:2). The Spirit of the Lord witnesses to faithful Latter-day Saints of the central place of eternal marriage and of the sublime joys associated with the everlasting continuation of the family. Through temples God's promises to the fathers—the promises pertaining to the gospel, the priesthood, and eternal increase (Abr. 2:8-11)—are extended to all God's children. The hearts of the children turn to the ancient fathers because the children are now participants in and recipients of the blessings of the fathers. Being profoundly grateful for such privileges, members of the Church (motivated by the spirit of Elijah) also find their hearts turning to their more immediate fathers, and do all within their power (through genealogical research and subsequent temple work) to insure that the blessings of the ancient fathers are enjoyed by ancestry as well as posterity. "If it were not so [that is, if Elijah had not come to restore the powers by which families could be sealed everlastingly], the whole earth would be utterly wasted at [Christ's] coming" (D&C 2:3). Why? Simply because the earth would not have accomplished its foreordained purposes, to establish on its face a family system patterned after the order of heaven. If there were no binding and sealing powers whereby families could be cemented forever, then the plans and designs and schemes of mortal man—being basically purposeless from an eternal perspective—would be revealed at the Second Coming as the empty and superficial substitues which they are. The Lord's purpose is to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of man (Moses 1:39). Because of Elijah's coming, ancestry and posterity may be grafted together eternally.

 

"Therefore the keys of this dispensation are committed into your hands; and by this ye may know that the dreadful day of the Lord is near, even at the doors" (D&C 110:16).

 

 

(Robert L. Millet and Kent P. Jackson, eds., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 1: The Doctrine and Covenants [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1989], 422.)

 

 

D&C 131

 

2 Peter 1 – We are to be working on making our calling and election sure.  It is known by revelation and ordinance that you are qualified to move on to the next phase to prepare the people for the Millennium.

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 131:1-5.)

 

1 In the celestial glory there are three heavens or degrees;

 

2 And in order to obtain the highest, a man must enter into this order of the priesthood [meaning the new and everlasting covenant of marriage];

 

3 And if he does not, he cannot obtain it.

 

4 He may enter into the other, but that is the end of his kingdom; he cannot have an increase.

 

5 (May 17th, 1843.) The more sure word of prophecy means a man’s knowing that he is sealed up unto eternal life, by revelation and the spirit of prophecy, through the power of the Holy Priesthood.

 

Doctrine and Covenants 131:2

 

What is the difference between “the new and everlasting covenant” and “the new and everlasting covenant of marriage”?

 

Because in Doctrine and Covenants 131 the Lord is discussing the exalted state that can be inherited only by those who have worthily entered celestial marriage, he particularly emphasizes the importance of this “new and everlasting covenant of marriage.” That covenant should not be confused with the “new and everlasting covenant” that is the gospel as a whole. See D&C 22. While “baptism is the gate to the celestial kingdom,” affirmed Elder Bruce R. McConkie, “celestial marriage is the gate to an exaltation in the highest heaven within the celestial world” (Mormon Doctrine, 118).

 

 

(Richard O. Cowan, Answers to Your Questions About the Doctrine and Covenants [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1996], 145.)

 

 

 

Doctrine and Covenants 131:5

 

Why is it important to receive “the more sure word of prophecy” and how can we do so?

 

Receiving the assurance called “the more sure word of prophecy” (D&C 131:5D&C 131:5) is essentially the same thing as being “sealed by the Holy Spirit of promise” (D&C 76:53) or making our “calling and election sure” (2 Peter 1:10). See D&C 76:53. Achieving this lofty spiritual goal prepares us to enjoy the further remarkable privilege of receiving the Second Comforter—meeting the Savior face to face. See D&C 67:10.

 

“The first great revelation that a person needs to get is to know the divinity of the work,” explained Elder Bruce R. McConkie (How to Get Personal Revelation, 8). Then, building on this testimony, we should constantly strive to keep the commandments and grow spiritually to the point we are worthy to inherit eternal life. The ultimate revelation that we should seek to obtain from the Holy Ghost is the assurance that our calling and election has been made sure. Elder McConkie challenged us to live so that we might “have the whisperings of the Spirit in [our] heart and soul and, in addition, can see visions, entertain angels, behold the face of the Lord” (How to Get Personal Revelation, 1).

 

The apostle Peter recalled the marvelous experience on the “holy mount” when he and his brethren beheld the transfigured Lord and heard the voice of God from heaven. Now he declared that he had an even “more sure word of prophecy” (2 Peter 1:18-19). He challenges us to give diligence to make our calling and election sure by adding “to your faith virtue; and to virtue knowledge; and to knowledge temperance; and to temperance patience; and to patience godliness; and to godliness brotherly kindness; and to brotherly kindness charity” (vv. 5-7).

 

Reflecting on Peter’s words, the Prophet Joseph Smith expounded: “Though they might hear the voice of God and know that Jesus was the Son of God, this would be no evidence that their election and calling was made sure, that they had part with Christ, and were joint heirs with Him. They then would want that more sure word of prophecy, that they were sealed in the heavens and the promise of eternal life in the kingdom of God. Then, having this promise sealed unto them, it was an anchor to the soul, sure and steadfast.” The Prophet then exhorted: “Go on and continue to call upon God until you make your calling and election sure for yourselves, by obtaining this more sure word of prophecy, and wait patiently for the promise until you obtain it” (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, 298-99).

 

After defining “the more sure word of prophecy,” Joseph Smith taught that “it is impossible for a man to be saved in ignorance” of this saving witness (D&C 131:6). “If a man be ignorant of the terms on which salvation is predicated,” reasoned Elder James E. Talmage, “he is unable to comply therewith, and consequently fails to attain what otherwise might have been his eternal gain” (Vitality of Mormonism, 268).

 

The great gift of eternal life “may not, of course, be fully realized during earth life,” pointed out Elder Marion G. Romney. “An assurance that it will be obtained in the world to come may, however, be had in this world. As a matter of fact, the blessings of the celestial kingdom are promised only to those who have such an assurance.” This blessing may not be realized in mortality, but we should be striving for it. Elder Romney concluded that it “is within the reach of us all, because it is not to be paid in money nor in any of this world’s goods but in righteous living. What is required is wholehearted devotion to the gospel and unreserved allegiance to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints” (in Conference Report, Oct. 1949, 41, 43).

 

 

(Richard O. Cowan, Answers to Your Questions About the Doctrine and Covenants [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1996], 145.)

 

 

The purpose of life is to work out one’s salvation in this world and in the world to come. (D&C 46:7.) Salvation comes by obedience to the principles and practices of the gospel of Jesus Christ.

 

Elder Marion G. Romney of the Council of the Twelve reminds us that eternal life is not achieved in this life, but an assurance of it may be received here. (D&C 131:5.) In order to make one’s calling and election sure, the following three things are necessary: (1) to receive the testimony of Jesus and be baptized; (2) to receive the Holy Ghost by the laying on of hands; and (3) to be sealed by the Holy Spirit of Promise. Brother Romney proceeded to say:

 

. . . What is required is wholehearted devotion to the gospel and unreserved allegiance to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Speaking to this point, the Prophet taught “. . . that those who keep the commandments of the Lord and walk in his statutes to the end, are the only individuals who shall receive the blessings. . . . We must be willing to sacrifice everything. Through self-discipline and devotion we must demonstrate to the Lord that we are willing to serve him under all circumstances. When we have done this, we shall receive an assurance that we shall have eternal life in the world to come. Then we shall have peace in this world. (Conference Report, September 1949, pp. 41-44.)

 

 

(Roy W. Doxey, The Doctrine and Covenants Speaks [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1964], 2: 414.)

 

 

Setting for Section 131

 

On Tuesday, 16 May 1843, Joseph Smith arrived in Ramus for another visit. The Prophet made several social calls in the afternoon before going to Benjamin Johnson's home for the evening. "Before retiring, I gave Brother and Sister Johnson some instructions on the priesthood," Joseph recorded later in his history. fn Brother Johnson's memoirs reveal even more about what those instructions were like: "In the evening he called me and my wife to come and sit down, for he wished to marry us according to the Law of the Lord. I thought it was a joke, and said, I should not marry my wife again, unless she courted me, for I did it all the first time. He chided my levity, told me he was in earnest, and so it proved, for we stood up and were sealed by the Holy Spirit of Promise." fn

 

The same eventful evening Joseph placed his hand on the knee of his devoted scribe, William Clayton, and said, "Your life is hid with Christ in God." Joseph proceeded to seal Brother Clayton unto eternal life and to explain more details about the new and everlasting covenant of marriage similar to those found in D&C 132:16-17, 26. fn Joseph concluded his instructions to Clayton by referring to the three heavens or degrees in the celestial kingdom and certifying that entrance into the highest only would come through participation in the new and everlasting covenant of marriage (see D&C 131:1-4). This last ordinance had just been performed that evening for Benjamin Johnson and his wife Melissa.

 

Still later that evening Joseph Smith and Benjamin Johnson were conversing privately in a bedroom. Benjamin recorded that Joseph "gave me such ideas pertaining to endowments as he thought proper." fn

 

The next morning, Wednesday, the 17th of May, Joseph preached in a public morning meeting. Doctrine and Covenants 131:5-6, concerning the more sure word of prophecy, was part of that sermon. Joseph also stated in the same speech that salvation means a man's being placed beyond the powers of his enemies and that Paul had seen the third heavens, but that he (Joseph) had seen more than that. Joseph also stated that Peter had penned the most sublime language of any of the apostles. fn

 

That evening the Prophet and the town residents had another interesting experience. A Methodist preacher, Samuel Prior, who was visiting Ramus, was called upon to speak to the congregation. This surprised Prior, who had expected no religious toleration among the Mormons. After Prior closed his remarks, Joseph politely asked Prior for permission to make comments on the latter's speech. In Prior's words, Joseph "mildly" spoke "like one who was more desirous to disseminate truth and expose error, than to love the malicious triumph of debate over me." fn Doctrine and Covenants 131:7-8, regarding all spirit being matter, is part of Joseph's comments in response to Reverend Prior's remarks. Reverend Prior later called on the Prophet in Nauvoo.

 

Doctrinal Gems in Sections 129-131

 

These "instructions" of the Prophet in 1843, now found in D&C 129-131, contain numerous doctrinal gems that in some instances are related, but in other cases bear hardly any relationship to each other. In any event all of these revealed doctrines are unique to the Latter-day Saints and serve to extend vastly our vision of eternity. For purposes of clarity and space, we will deal with only three of these key doctrinal areas, drawing from all three instructional sections of the Doctrine and Covenants and other useful interpretive sources.

 

The Ministry of Angels

 

The Restoration of the gospel and the Church is largely based on the visitations of angels to the Prophet Joseph Smith and a few selected others. Early in his role as a prophet, Joseph became acquainted with the nature of angels, having been visited by Moroni, John the Baptist, Peter, James, John, Michael, Gabriel, Raphael (see D&C 128:20-21), as well as such Book of Mormon personages as Mormon, Nephi, and Alma. fn On the other hand, Joseph also became acquainted with Satan and his innumerable train of associates when he first was shown the Book of Mormon plates by the Angel Moroni. fn Somewhere in these early experiences he became acquainted with what he called the "grand keys" to distinguish good angels from evil angels. Thus he gave as instructions to Elder Parley P. Pratt the instructions contained in D&C 129:4-9.

 

That Joseph understood something about these keys as early as the 1829-30 period or even earlier may be drawn from his statement in D&C 128:20: "The voice of Michael on the banks of the Susquehanna, detecting the devil when he appeared as an angel of light!" Since the Prophet did not return to the Susquehanna River area near Harmony, Pennsylvania after 1830, this experience with Michael and the devil disguised as an angel of light would have occurred by that year.

 

Joseph Smith certainly was thoroughly acquainted with these "grand keys" by 1839, because he instructed members of the Twelve concerning them prior to the apostles' leaving for their monumental mission to Great Britain. The Prophet was eager to counsel the Twelve in many matters of the kingdom prior to their leaving and hence spent a week with them in private meetings from 27 June to 2 July 1839. Some of his profound instructions dealt with the ministry of angels. Elder Wilford Woodruff penned the following in his journal of 27 June 1839:

 

Among the vast number of the Keys of the Kingdom of God Joseph presented the following one to the Twelve for their benefit in there experience & travels in the flesh as follows:

 

In order to detect the devel when he transforms himself nigh unto an angel of light. When an angel of God appears unto man face to face in personage & reaches out his hand unto the man & he takes hold of the angels hand & feels a substance the same as one man would in Shaking hands with another he may then know that it is an angel of God, & he should place all Confidence in him. Such personages or angels are Saints with there resurrected Bodies.

 

But if a personage appears unto man & offers him his hand & the man takes hold of it & he feels nothing or does not sens any substance he may know it is the devel, for when a Saint whose body is not resurrected appears unto man in the flesh he will not offer him his hand for this is against the law given him & in keeping in mind these things we may detec the devil that he deceived us not. fn

 

The connection between these instructions and those in section 129 is unmistakable. Hence these "grand keys" were known by at least some members of the Twelve three and one-half years before they were revealed again in 1843.

 

A few days after the above discourse, on 2 July 1839, Joseph Smith was still instructing the Twelve. "We may look for angels and receive their ministrations," he told them, "but we are to try the spirits and prove them, for it is often the case that men make a mistake in regard to these things. . . . Lying spirits are going forth in the earth. There will be great manifestations of spirits, both false and true." fn These instructions and keys concerning angels became very useful for the Twelve in Britain, for in addition to being ministered to by righteous angels in the course of their missionary work, they were likewise plagued by evil spirits.

 

The Prophet apparently was also thoroughly acquainted with the appropriate appearance of angels. For one thing, he explained in 1839 that an angel of God never has wings. fn In 1842 he recalled an experience where Satan had appeared as an angel of light. "A sister in the state of New York had a vision," he wrote,

 

who said it was told her that if she would go to a certain place in the woods an angel would appear to her—she went at the appointed time and saw a glorious personage descending arrayed in white, with sandy coloured hair; he commenced and told her to fear God and said that her husband was called to do great things, but that he must not go more than one hundred miles from home or he would not return; whereas God had called him to go to the ends of the earth: and he has since been more than one thousand miles from home, and is yet alive. Many true things were spoken by this personage and many things that were false.—How it may be asked was this known to be a bad angel? by the color of his hair; that is one of the signs that he can be known by, and by contradicting a former revelation. fn

 

In the same instructions given to Parley P. Pratt on 9 February 1843 (but which were not included in D&C 129), Joseph related, "A man came to me in Kirtland, and told me he had seen an angel, and described his dress. I told him he had seen no angel, and that there was no such dress in heaven." fn

 

Joseph Smith also delineated two different types of heavenly beings in his instructions to Parley P. Pratt: (1) "Angels, who are resurrected personages, having bodies of flesh and bones" (D&C 129:1) and (2) "the spirits of just men made perfect, they who are not resurrected, but inherit the same glory" (D&C 129:3). Several months later, while preaching at a funeral sermon, Joseph indicated that the spirits of just men made perfect "can only be revealed in flaming fire, or glory" and that angels "have advanced farther—their light and glory being tabernacled, and hence [they] appear in bodily shape." fn The spirits of just men made perfect are interpreted as the spirits of individuals who have worked out their salvation, but are awaiting the day of their resurrection. fn

 

President George Q. Cannon broadened this Doctrine and Covenants definition of angels when he wrote in 1891:

 

In the broadest sense, any being who acts as a messenger for our Heavenly Father, is an angel, be he a God, a resurrected man, or the spirit of a just man; and the term is so used in all these senses in the ancient scriptures. In the stricter and more limited sense, an angel is, as the Prophet Joseph Smith states, a resurrected personage, having a body of flesh and bones; but it must be remembered that none of the angels who appeared to men before the death of the Savior could be of that class, for none of them was resurrected. fn

 

This idea of various appointments and stations of angels was further clarified by President Charles W. Penrose in 1912: "Angels are God's messengers, whether used in the capacity as unembodied spirits, selected according to their capacities for the work required, or as disembodied spirits, or as translated men, or as resurrected beings. They are agents of Deity of different degrees of intelligence, power and authority, under the direction of higher dignitaries, and subject to law and order in their respective spheres." fn

 

Regarding the dwelling place of these angels, the Prophet explained to the Ramus Saints in April 1843 that angels "reside in the presence of God" where "all things for their glory are manifest, past, present, and future" (D&C 130:7). Joseph also pointed out that all the angels that minister or have ministered to this earth have belonged to this earth (D&C 130:5). Presumably this means that all the resurrected beings, translated beings, or spirits who have served as heavenly messengers were once mortal beings on this earth, or will yet take a body and live on earth.

 

Christ's Second Coming

 

Nothing seemed to attract the attention of the Prophet and the early Saints as much as the subject of the prophesied coming of the Savior. After all, Joseph Smith had learned in his earliest heavenly manifestations that the restoration of the gospel and the true Church were but a necessary prelude to the Second Coming of the Son of Man and his millennial reign on the earth. Many of the early revelations to the Prophet in the Doctrine and Covenants were dedicated wholly or in large measure to the signs of the times and to warning of the great calamities and destructions that must occur prior to the Second Coming. fn

 

Joseph's "instructions" to the Saints in Ramus as found in D&C 130 contribute to our understanding of the Second Coming in two general areas: (1) the actual appearance of the Savior when he comes again, and (2) the time of his coming.

 

As previously mentioned, Orson Hyde accompanied the Prophet to Ramus in early April 1843 and propounded some incorrect doctrine in his sermon there. Elder Hyde had claimed that the Savior would appear "on a white horse as a warrior." fn Joseph kindly corrected Orson before the Saints by declaring, "When the Savior shall appear we shall see him as he is. We shall see that he is a man like ourselves" (D&C 130:1). The Prophet actually was doing no more than sustaining the Apostle John's statement in his first general epistle, wherein he wrote, "When he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is" (1 John 3:2). We also read from Luke that an angel said, as the Lord ascended to heaven in full view of his apostles, "This same Jesus, which is taken up from you into heaven, shall so come in like manner as ye have seen him go into heaven" (Acts 1:11).

 

Joseph Smith's teachings as to the time of the Second Coming in these "instructions" were particularly useful to the Saints in the Nauvoo period when speculation was rife concerning the date of the Lord's appearance. Many millennialistic prophecies were in the air in the United States in the 1840s. Foremost among those in America who were predicting actual dates was William Miller, who had predicted—according to his biblical interpretation—that Christ would appear on 3 April 1843. So much of America was caught up in Miller's calculations and predictions that Horace Greeley's New York Tribune published an extra edition on 2 March 1843, to refute Miller's mathematics. Many of the Latter-day Saints also expected the Savior to return soon and saw signs in the heavens in 1843 that they took to be evidences of the Savior's imminent return. fn The Prophet often referred to William Miller in his conversations and was obviously eager to obtain the Lord's will on the subject of when Christ would come again.

 

"I was once praying very earnestly to know the time of the coming of the Son of Man" (D&C 130:14), explained the Prophet to the members in Ramus just the day before Miller's projected date of 3 April 1843. Joseph went on to tell how the Lord informed him that if he Joseph) lived until he was eighty-five years old, he would see the face of the Son of Man (D&C 130:15). Joseph was left wondering whether this appearance referred to the beginning of the Millennium or to some previous appearing, or whether he would die and thus see Christ's face (D&C 130:16). In any event the Prophet was convinced that the Savior would not come again prior to 1890 (the year when Joseph would have been 85). This prophecy and another which he gave four days later in general conference, fn were held in high esteem by the Latter-day Saints for the next several years and served as effective counterpoints to the false views of William Miller. On 3 April Joseph observed, "Miller's day of judgment has arrived, but it is too pleasant for false prophets." fn

 

As far as we in the present are concerned, we must be satisfied with the biblical explanation that no one knows the day or the hour when the Savior will return (see Matt. 24:36). Our main objective should be to stand in holy places (D&C 87:8) and to have the Holy Spirit as our guide (D&C 45:57) rather than laboring to ascertain the exact date of the Lord's reappearing.

 

More Sure Word of Prophecy

 

Joseph Smith used 2 Peter chapter 1 as his text when he instructed the Saints in Ramus on 17 May 1843. When he came across the phrase, "the more sure word of prophecy" in v. 19, he defined it as follows: "a man's knowing that he is sealed up unto eternal life, by revelation and the spirit of prophecy, through the power of the Holy Priesthood" (D&C 131:6).

 

This was not the first time the Prophet had discoursed on this subject, one which he considered vital in one's quest for eternal life. Speaking to the Twelve Apostles on 17 June 1839 (the same occasion when he gave the apostles the "grand keys" to distinguish angels), the Prophet spoke about two comforters, the first being the Holy Ghost, and the second being the actual ministration of Christ to a mortal person.

 

After a person has faith in Christ, repents of his sins, and is baptized for the remission of his sins and receives the Holy Ghost, (by laying on of hands), which is the first Comforter, then let him continue to humble himself before God, hungering and thirsting after righteousness, and living by every word of God, and the Lord will soon say to him, son, thou shalt be exalted. When the Lord has thoroughly proved him, and finds that the man is determined to serve Him at all hazards, then the man will find his calling and his election made sure, then it will be his privilege to receive the other Comforter, which the Lord hath promised the Saints. fn

 

The phrase, "to make your calling and election sure," also comes from 2 Peter 1, this time from v. 10. It appears from Joseph Smith's foregoing description that at this date (1839) the Prophet was closely tying together the concepts of making one's calling and election sure and the more sure word of prophecy.

 

Just three days before Joseph Smith gave his instructions in Ramus that are now found in D&C 131, he was speaking to a similar gathering of outlying Saints in Yelrome (named after Isaac Morley; Yelrome is Morley spelled backwards with an additional e). As he would do later in the week, the Prophet took as his text 2 Peter chapter 1. Pertaining to the need for obtaining the more sure word of prophecy, the Prophet declared, "The apostle [Peter] exhorts them to add to their faith, virtue, knowledge, temperance, &c., yet he exhorts them to make their calling and election sure. And though they had heard an audible voice from heaven bearing testimony that Jesus was the Son of God, yet he says we have a more sure word of prophecy, whereunto ye do well that ye take heed as unto a light shining in a dark place." fn The Prophet then proceeded to define the more sure word of prophecy: "[The assurance] that they were sealed in the heavens and had the promise of eternal life in the kingdom of God. Then, having this promise sealed unto them, it was an anchor to the soul, sure and steadfast. Though the thunders might roll and lightning’s flash, and earthquakes bellow, and war gather thick around, yet this hope and knowledge would support the soul in every hour of trial, trouble and tribulation. Then knowledge through our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ is the grand key that unlocks the glories and mysteries of the kingdom of heaven." fn Thus the Prophet in effect defined the more sure word of prophecy as the knowledge that one has made his calling and election sure. Hence Joseph's statement, "It is impossible for a man to be saved in ignorance" (D&C 131:6), when taken in its proper context, has reference to the more sure word of prophecy, and not simply to the acquisition of intellectual knowledge. Rather it means that a person must receive the assurance from the Lord that his calling and election is made sure. No man can be saved ultimately in ignorance of this knowledge. fn

 

As previously mentioned, the instructions about the three degrees in the celestial kingdom and that a person must have entered the new and everlasting covenant of marriage to obtain the highest of those three degrees (D&C 131:1-4) were given in private conversation to Joseph Smith's scribe, William Clayton, in Benjamin Johnson's home in Ramus, Illinois. Virtually in the same breath, Joseph proclaimed to William that his "life was hid with Christ in God," and "that nothing but the unpardonable sin can prevent [him] from inheriting eternal life." Joseph assured William further that he was "sealed up by the power of the Priesthood unto eternal life." fn Once again, noting the context and the selection of words, we can safely conclude that having one's life hid with Christ in God (see Col. 3:3) is synonymous with having one's calling and election made sure. Furthermore, eternal marriage sets one on a course which may eventuate in these consummate blessings.

 

Conclusion

 

Joseph Smith was a man who took on many roles. He was able to express himself clearly and forcefully during the spring of 1843, a period of unusual peace for him. He showed himself at his best as a profound theologian, a loyal friend, a charismatic teacher, a kind person to strangers, and a revealer of new and (to the world) unusual doctrine and religious practices.

 

Doctrine and Covenants 129-31 have long been loved and widely quoted by Latter-day Saints. Most members of the Church have been inspired to greater religious application by the content of these three sections. While the doctrines and prophecies of these three sections are profound and singularly interesting, they did not arise from a whim of Joseph Smith. There is strong evidence of previous thought and revelation on all of the subjects in these important items of instruction.

 

 

(Robert L. Millet and Kent P. Jackson, eds., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 1: The Doctrine and Covenants [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1989], 501.)

 

 

 

A New and Everlasting Covenant

(D&C 132)

 

ROBERT L. MILLET

 

President Brigham Young spoke eloquently concerning the infinite scope of marriage:

 

The whole subject of the marriage relation is not in my reach, nor in any other man's reach on this earth. It is without beginning of days or end of years: it is a hard matter to reach. We can tell some things with regard to it: it lays the foundation for worlds, for angels, and for the Gods; for intelligent beings to be crowned with glory, immortality and eternal lives. In fact, it is the thread which runs from the beginning to the end of the holy Gospel of Salvation—of the Gospel of the Son of God; it is from eternity to eternity. fn

 

The profound truths contained in section 132 of the Doctrine and Covenants (when read in conjunction with other revelations, particularly section 131) constitute the scriptural authority for the unique and exalted concept of marriage and family among the Latter-day Saints. In a day when iniquity abounds and the love of many has begun to wax cold (D&C 45:27), the revelations of God through his prophets provide an anchor to the troubled soul. D&C 132 is a message which is both peaceful and penetrating, a revelation which can bring order and organization to things on earth, as well as point man toward his infinite possibilities among the Gods.

 

Backgrounds

 

The fulness of the gospel is called by the Lord his "new and everlasting covenant." In a revelation given in October, 1830 Joseph Smith was told: "Verily I say unto you, blessed are you for receiving mine everlasting covenant, even the fulness of my gospel, sent forth unto the children of men, that they might have life and be partakers of the glories which are to be revealed in the last days, as it was written by the prophets and apostles in days of old" (D&C 66:2; cf. 39:11; 45:9; 133:57). Elder Bruce R. McConkie has written:

 

The gospel is the everlasting covenant because it is ordained by Him who is Everlasting and also because it is everlastingly the same. In all past ages salvation was gained by adherence to its terms and conditions, and that same compliance will bring the same reward in all future ages. Each time this everlasting covenant is revealed it is new to those of that dispensation. Hence the gospel is the new and everlasting covenant. fn

 

Eternal Marriage, the ordinance by which couples enter into the Patriarchal Order (D&C 131:1-2), is a new and everlasting covenant within the fulness of the gospel. In our day it is a crucial element in the restitution of all things (D&C 132:40, 45). Eternal Marriage is the ordinance and covenant which leads to the consummate blessings of the gospel of Jesus Christ; it is that order of the priesthood which, when put into effect, will bind ancestry to posterity and thus prevent the earth from being utterly wasted at the time of the Savior's Second Coming (D&C 2).

 

As the introductory material to section 132 states, the basic doctrines of this revelation were received as early as 1831, yet the full application and historical context reflect its 1843 recording. A statement from Joseph Noble, a close associate of Joseph Smith the Prophet, is instructive. Noble observed that the revelation on eternal marriage was given to Joseph "while he was engaged in the work of translation of the Scriptures." fn The opening verse of the revelation suggests that Joseph had inquired concerning Old Testament personalities and their participation in plural marriage. The Prophet would have been involved in the study of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob—the book of Genesis—in 1830 and 1831. fn Elder B. H. Roberts has given the following extended explanation:

 

There is indisputable evidence that the revelation making known this marriage law was given to the Prophet as early as 1831. In that year, and then intermittently up to 1833, the Prophet was engaged in a revision of the English Bible text under the inspiration of God, Sidney Rigdon in the main acting as his scribe. As he began his revision with the Old Testament, he would be dealing with the age of the Patriarchs in 1831. He was doubtless struck with the favor in which the Lord held the several Bible Patriarchs of that period, notwithstanding they had a plurality of wives. What more natural than that he should inquire of the Lord at that time, when his mind must have been impressed with the fact—Why, O Lord, didst Thou justify Thy servants, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob; as also Moses, David and Solomon, in the matter of their having many wives and concubines (see opening paragraph of the Revelation)? In answer to that inquiry came the revelation, though not then committed to writing. fn

 

The Prophet Joseph Smith shared many of the details of the revelation with intimate associates, particularly when he felt one could be trusted to value and preserve a sacred matter. Between 1831 and 1843 a number of the leaders of the Church were instructed concerning the eternal marriage covenant (including the plurality of wives) and were told that eventually many of the faithful would be called upon to comply with the will of the Lord. In speaking to a gathering of the Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints in Plano, Illinois in 1878, Orson Pratt

 

explained the circumstances connected with the coming forth of the revelation on plural marriage. Refuted the statement and belief of those present that Brigham Young was the author of the revelation; showed that Joseph Smith the Prophet had not only commenced the practice of that principle himself, and taught it to others, before President Young and the Twelve had returned from their mission in Europe, in 1841, but that Joseph actually received revelations upon that principle as early as 1831. fn

 

As one might expect, the doctrine of plural marriage was not easily received, even by those who were otherwise counted as faithful. President John Taylor, known to be one of the purest men who ever lived, explained that "when this system [polygamy] was first introduced among this people, it was one of the greatest crosses that was ever taken up by any set of men since the world stood." fn Helen Mar Whitney, one of Joseph Smith's plural wives, recalled that Joseph "said that the practice of this principle would be the hardest trial the Saints would ever have to test their faith." fn One of those for whom the principle was particularly difficult was Emma Smith, wife of the Prophet. It appears, therefore, that one of the major reasons for the formal recording of the revelation in 1843 was to assist Emma to recognize the divine source of this doctrine. William Clayton, private secretary to Joseph Smith, recorded the following:

 

On the morning of the 12th of July, 1843, Joseph and Hyrum Smith came into the office of the upper story of the "Brick-store," on the bank of the Mississippi River. They were talking of the subject of plural marriage, [and] Hyrum said to Joseph, "If you will write the revelation of celestial marriage, I will take and read it to Emma, and I believe I can convince her of its truth, and you will hereafter have peace." Joseph smiled and remarked, "You do not know Emma as well as I do." Hyrum repeated his opinion, and further remarked, "The doctrine is so plain, I can convince any reasonable man or woman of its truth, purity, and heavenly origin," or words to that effect. . . . Joseph and Hyrum then sat down, and Joseph commenced to dictate the Revelation on Celestial Marriage, and I wrote it, sentence by sentence, as he dictated. After the whole was written, Joseph asked me to read it through slowly and carefully, which I did, and he pronounced it correct. fn

 

The following entry from William Clayton's diary for 12 July 1843 is interesting: "This A.M. I wrote a Revelation consisting of 10 pages on the order of the priesthood, showing the designs in Moses, Abraham, David and Solomon having many wives & concubines &c. After it was wrote Prests. Joseph & Hyrum presented it and read it to E[mma]. who said she did not believe a word of it and appeared very rebellious." fn

 

D&C 132 is a revelation dealing with celestial marriage. It also contains information and explanations concerning the practice of plural marriage. One Latter-day Saint historian, Danel Bachman, has suggested that section 132 consists largely of the Lord's answers to three critical questions posed by the Prophet Joseph Smith. fn We will consider the questions and answers more carefully as we come to them in the text of the revelation.

 

The Lord's Justification (vv. 1-6)

 

The first question asked by the Prophet Joseph was simply why the polygamous actions of notable Old Testament prophet-leaders had received divine approval. Why was it, the Prophet wanted to know, that prophets, patriarchs, and kings could have many wives and concubines? fn In the Lord's response, Joseph was told to prepare his heart for the instructions about to be given (v. 3); in this instance the explanation for the ancient phenomenon was to be accompanied by a commandment to institute the practice in modern times. Seeking further light and knowledge had led the Prophet to further and greater obligations; much was about to be given, and much would soon be required (cf. D&C 82:3). Salvation in the highest heaven was at stake. Those who received this new and everlasting covenant (and thereafter chose to abide by its terms and conditions) qualified themselves—through the eternal principle of obedience (cf. D&C 130:20-21)—for the fulness of the glory of the Father, "which glory shall be a fulness and a continuation of the seeds forever and ever" (v. 19). These are they who shall be enlarged, that is, have an increase—spirit children into the eternities. They enjoy eternal lives (D&C 131:1-4; 132:17, 24). Joseph had taught these principles only two months earlier: "Except a man and his wife enter into an everlasting covenant and be married for eternity, while in this probation, by the power and authority of the Holy Priesthood, they will cease to increase when they die; that is, they will not have any children after the resurrection. But those who are married by the power and authority of the priesthood in this life, and continue without committing the sin against the Holy Ghost, will continue to increase and have children in the celestial glory." fn

 

Salvation consists in the blessing of eternal lives, the continuation of the family unit in eternity. Damnation is the result of rejecting this new and everlasting covenant and is due largely to pursuing the broad and wide ways of the world; the punishment is "the deaths," the dissolution of the family unit beyond the grave (D&C 132:17, 24-25).

 

Marriage in the Lord: Sealed by the Holy Spirit of Promise (vv. 7-27, 49-50)

 

The second question posed by the Prophet Joseph Smith seems to be associated with the cryptic statement by Jesus in response to a Sadduceean trap: "Ye do err, not knowing the scriptures, nor the power of God. For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven" (Matt. 22:29-30; cf. Luke 20:34-36). This expression, little understood in the days of the Prophet, is repeatedly given today as scriptural evidence against the Latter-day Saint doctrine of eternal marriage. Joseph Smith's question concerning its meaning led to a modern revealed commentary upon the passage and pointed us to the reality that Jesus Christ had taught the doctrine of eternal marriage during his mortal ministry. fn

 

From section 132 we learn that THEY who neither marry nor are given in marriage in eternity are they who choose not to enter in by the strait gate and partake of the new and everlasting covenant of marriage. Even persons who qualify in every other way for the glories of the celestial kingdom, but who for selfish reasons reject opportunities for celestial marriage, cannot attain unto the highest degree of the celestial glory (cf. D&C 131:1-4). Such persons are "appointed angels in heaven, which angels are ministering servants, to minister for those who are worthy of a far more, and an exceeding, and an eternal weight of glory." The Lord continued: Because they did not abide by his law, "they cannot be enlarged, but remain separately and singly, without exaltation, in their saved condition, to all eternity; and from henceforth are not gods, but are angels of God forever and ever" (D&C 132:16-17). In commenting upon the status of angels, Joseph Smith said: "Gods have an ascendency over the angels, who are ministering servants. In the resurrection, some are raised to be angels, others are raised to become Gods." fn

 

The Holy Spirit of Promise is the Holy Ghost, the Holy Spirit promised to the faithful. The Holy Ghost is a member of the Godhead with vital and important roles in the salvation of the people of the earth. He is a revelator and a testator, the means by which a witness of the truth is obtained. He is a sanctifier, the means by which filth and dross are burned out of the human soul as though by fire. One of the highest functions the Holy Ghost serves is to be a sealer, as the Holy Spirit of Promise. In this capacity he searches the heart, certifies a person is just, and thereafter seals an exaltation upon that person. That is to say, to be sealed by the Holy Spirit of Promise is to be sealed unto eternal life. In commenting on v. 7 in section 132 (regarding all covenants, contracts, bonds, etc. having the seal of the Holy Spirit of Promise), Elder Bruce R. McConkie has written:

 

By way of illustration, this means that baptism, partaking of the sacrament, administering to the sick, marriage, and every covenant that man ever makes with the Lord . . . must be performed in righteousness by and for people who are worthy to receive whatever blessing is involved, otherwise whatever is done has no binding and sealing effect in eternity.

 

Since "the Comforter knoweth all things" (D&C 42:17), it follows that it is not possible "to lie to the Holy Ghost" and thereby gain an unearned or undeserved blessing, as Ananias and Sapphira found out to their sorrow (Acts 5:1-11). And so this provision that all things must be sealed by the Holy Spirit of Promise, if they are to have "efficacy, virtue, or force in and after the resurrection from the dead" (D&C 132:7), the Lord's system for dealing with absolute impartiality with all men, and for giving all men exactly what they merit, neither adding to nor diminishing from.

 

When the Holy Spirit of Promise places his ratifying seal upon a baptism, or a marriage, or any covenant, except that of having one's calling and election made sure, the seal is a conditional approval or ratification; it is binding in eternity only in the event of subsequent obedience to the terms and conditions of whatever covenant is involved.

 

But when the ratifying seal of approval is placed upon someone whose calling and election is thereby made sure—because there are no more conditions to be met by the obedient person—this act of being sealed up unto eternal life is of such transcendent import that of itself it is called being sealed by the Holy Spirit of Promise, which means that in this crowning sense, being so sealed is the same as having one's calling and election made sure. fn

 

Without question, one of the most misunderstood (and misquoted) verses of scripture is D&C 132:26. Some members of the Church have wrested the scriptures to the point where they have concluded that a temple marriage alone (which they equate with being sealed by the Holy Spirit of Promise) will assure them of an exaltation, in spite of "any sin of the new and everlasting covenant whatever, and all manner of blasphemies." When it is fully understood, however, that the marriage ceremony performed in the House of the Lord—though performed by worthy priesthood bearers granted sacred sealing powers—is a conditional ordinance, a rite whose eventual blessings are contingent upon the faithfulness (in years to come) of the participants, then v. 26 is recognized as being consistent with other related principles—obedience, endurance to the end, and appropriate reward. Verse 26 has reference to those who have received the new and everlasting covenant of marriage, have complied with all its conditions, and have passed the tests of mortality. These are they who, paraphrasing Joseph Smith, have lived by every word of God, and are willing to serve the Lord at all hazards. They have made their callings and elections sure to eternal life. fn Persons who attain to this level of righteousness "are sealed up against all manner of sin and blasphemy except the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost and the shedding of innocent blood." fn

 

The Prophet Joseph Smith extended the challenging invitation to the Saints: "I would exhort you to go on and continue to call upon God until you make your calling and election sure for yourselves, by obtaining this more sure word of prophecy, and wait patiently for the promise until you obtain it." fn Latter-day Saints who are married in the temple may thus press forward in the work of the Lord and with quiet dignity and patient maturity seek to be worthy of the certain assurance of eternal life before the end of their mortal lives. But should one not formally receive the more sure word of prophecy in this life, he has the scriptural promise that faithfully enduring to the end—keeping the covenants and commandments from baptism to the end of his life (Mosiah 18:8-9) eventuates in the promise of eternal life, whether that promise be received here or hereafter (D&C 14:7; cf. 2 Ne. 31:20; Mosiah 5:15).

 

All men are subject to temptation and mortal weaknesses and therefore commit some sin, even those whose callings and elections have been made sure (see D&C 20:32-34; 124:124). Though the disposition to commit grievous sin would certainly be less among such individuals, yet the principles of repentance and forgiveness are as highly treasured by these as by any of our Father's children. At the same time, where much is given, much is expected and required. Joseph Smith taught: "If men sin wilfully after they have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sin." fn In the words of a modern apostle: "Suppose such persons become disaffected and the spirit of repentance leaves them—which is a seldom and almost unheard of eventuality—still, what then? The answer is—and the revelations and teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith so recite!—they must then pay the penalty of their own sins, for the blood of Christ will not cleanse them." fn

 

When one is guilty of serious transgression and loses the right to the Spirit and the protective blessings of the priesthood, he is essentially "delivered unto the buffetings of Satan" (D&C 132:26), such that "Lucifer is free to torment, persecute, and afflict such a person without let or hindrance. When the bars are down, the cuffs and curses of Satan, both in this world and in the world to come, bring indescribable anguish typified by burning fire and brimstone" fn (cf. D&C 78:12; 82:20-21; 104:9-10; 1 Cor. 5:1-5).

 

Once one has been sealed by the Holy Spirit of Promise, he is in a position to either rise to exaltation or (through rebellion and apostasy) fall to perdition. Verse 27 has specific reference to those who have received the new and everlasting covenant of marriage and proven faithful enough to have the final stamp of approval from the Holy Ghost. One who has been sealed up unto eternal life and thereafter proves to be a total enemy to the cause of righteousness is guilty of "shedding innocent blood," the innocent blood of Christ, and assenting unto his death. fn Such a vicious disposition would lead the transgressor to reject and crucify the Son of God afresh (cf. Heb. 6:4-6).

 

Among the most beautiful and touching verses in section 132 are vv. 49 and 50, wherein the Lord seals an exaltation upon the head of Joseph the Seer. What a comfort to a troubled and weary mind to hear such words as these: "Verily I seal upon you your exaltation, and prepare a throne for you in the kingdom of my Father, with Abraham your father." The reader of this revelation is also given a meaningful insight into how to qualify for such a transcendent promise: "Behold I have seen your sacrifices, and will forgive all your sins; I have seen your sacrifices in obedience to that which I have told you. Go, therefore, and I make a way for your escape, as I accepted the offering of Abraham of his son Isaac." The key element in obtaining the promise of exaltation is sacrifice. It was to the School of the Prophets in the Winter of 1834-35 that Joseph had given profound counsel: only through the sacrifice of all things could one come to the point of faith or confidence wherein he could have an actual knowledge that the course in life he was pursuing was according to the divine will. "Those, then, who make the sacrifice," the Prophet had taught, "will have the testimony that their course is pleasing in the sight of God; and those who have this testimony will have faith to lay hold on eternal life." fn That principle of truth was now realized and confirmed directly upon the head of the one who had declared it less than ten years earlier; no matter what the eventuality, nothing could separate the man of God from the love of his God. fn

 

Marriage Among the Ancients (vv. 28-40)

 

As a type of follow-up on his first question, Joseph Smith was given additional insights into requirements made of individuals in ancient times. The Patriarch Abraham was instructed to take Hagar, the servant of Sarah, as a second wife, in order to bring to pass the promises made earlier to the Father of the Faithful—that his posterity would be as numerous as the stars in the heavens or the sands upon the seashore (Gen. 22:17; Abr. 3:14). This modern revelation helps to clarify the Old Testament story considerably (see Gen. 16), and shows that the decision to take an additional wife was a God-inspired directive, and not simply a desperate move by Sarah to insure posterity for her grieving husband. Joseph Smith was told that because of Abraham's perfect obedience he was granted the privilege of eternal increase. The Lord then said to Joseph: "This promise is yours also, because ye are of Abraham, and the promise was made unto Abraham." Then came the command to Joseph Smith, who had in 1836 received the keys necessary to become a modern Faither of the Faithful (D&C 110:12): "Go ye, therefore, and do the works of Abraham; enter ye into my law and ye shall be saved" (D&C 124:31-32; cf. 124:58).

 

The Lord further explained that Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob had attained godhood because of their implicit obedience. More specifically, because they only took additional wives as those wives were given by God, they have entered into their exaltation. David and Solomon were also given directions (through the legal administrators of their day) to take additional wives, and enjoyed the approbation of the heavens as they stayed within the bounds the Lord had set. When they moved outside the divinely given channel, however, and began to acquire wives and concubines for selfish or lustful reasons (e.g., David in the case of Bathsheba, 2 Sam. 11; Solomon in the case of taking "strange women" as wives, women who "turned away his heart" from the things of righteousness, 1 Kgs. 11), they offended God and forfeited the eternal rewards that might have been theirs. Jacob in the Book of Mormon, speaking in behalf of the Lord, warned his people: "Behold, David and Solomon truly had many wives and concubines, which thing was abominable before me, saith the Lord" Jacob 2:24). When both scriptural passages are read together Jacob 2 and D&C 132), it becomes clear that the Lord was condemning—in no uncertain terms—unauthorized plural marriages, and not the principle of plurality of wives per se. Later in that same chapter of Jacob the word of the Lord came: "For if I will, saith the Lord of Hosts, raise up seed unto me [through plural marriage] I will command my people; otherwise they shall hearken unto these things" (Jacob 2:30). Note the words of Joseph Smith as late as October of 1843: "[I] Gave instructions to try those persons who were preaching, teaching, or practicing the doctrine of plurality of wives; for, according to the law, I hold the keys of this power in the last days; for there is never but one on earth at a time on whom the power and its keys are conferred; and I have constantly said no man shall have but one wife at a time, unless the Lord directs otherwise." fn

 

Concerning Adultery (vv. 41-48, 58-62)

 

Verse 41 of section 132 suggests the third question that Joseph Smith must have asked of the Lord. In essence, the question of the Prophet was: "Why were not such polygamous relationships violations of the law of chastity? Why was this not considered adultery?" The Lord's answer was simple and forthright, although considerable space was devoted to the issue in the revelation: any action inspired, authorized, or commanded of God is moral and good. More specifically, marriages approved of the Almighty are recognized and acknowledged as sacred institutions, despite the values or opinions of earth or hell. Joseph wrote in 1839: "How much more dignified and noble are the thoughts of God, than the vain imaginations of the human heart!" fn Verse 36 of this section sheds light on this principle, the idea that whatever God requires is right: "Abraham was commanded to offer his son Isaac; nevertheless, it was written: Thou shalt not kill. Abraham, however, did not refuse, and it was accounted unto him for righteousness." In a letter written to Nancy Rigdon in 1842, Joseph sought to explain (albeit in veiled language) the appropriateness of plural marriage when divinely sanctioned:

 

Happiness is the object and design of our existence, and will be the end thereof if we pursue the path that leads to it; and this path is virtue, uprightness, holiness, and keeping all the commandments of God. But we cannot keep all the commandments without first knowing them, and we cannot expect to know all, or more than we now know, unless we comply with or keep those we have already received. That which is wrong under one circumstance, may be and often is, right under another. God said thou shalt not kill,—at another time he said thou shalt utterly destroy. This is the principle on which the government of heaven is conducted—by revelation adapted to the circumstances in which the children of the kingdom are placed. Whatever God requires is right, no matter what it is, although we may not see the reason thereof till long after the events transpire. If we seek first the kingdom of God, all good things will be added. So with Solomon—first he asked wisdom, and God gave it him, and with it every desire of his heart, even things which may be considered abominable to all who do not understand the order of heaven only in part, but which, in reality, were right, because God gave and sanctioned by special revelation. . . . Every thing that God gives us is lawful and right, and 'tis proper that we should enjoy his gifts and blessings whenever and wherever he is disposed to bestow; but if we should seize upon these same blessings and enjoyments without law, without revelation, without commandment, those blessings and enjoyments would prove cursings and vexations in the end, and we should have to go down in sorrow and wailings of everlasting regret. . . . Blessings offered, but rejected are no longer blessings, but become like the talent hid in the earth by the wicked and slothful servant—the proffered good returns to the giver, the blessing is bestowed upon those who will eceive. fn

 

In section 132 Emma Smith was encouraged to submit to the will of the Lord pertaining to her husband—to yield her heart to the mind of God with regard to the matter of plural marriages. Obedience would lead to glorious blessings; disobedience would lead to damnation, for the covenant people are to abide by this "law of the priesthood" whenever it is specifically given to them by new revelation through the living prophet.

 

Summary

 

We may rest assured that whatever God reveals is given for the benefit and fulfillment of his children—for their happiness. Celestial or eternal marriage has been given to man, according to the word of the Master, in order that man might "multiply and replenish the earth, according to my commandment, and . . . fulfill the promise which was given by my Father before the foundation of the world, and for their exaltation in the eternal worlds, that they may bear the souls of men; for herein is the work of my Father continued, that he may be glorified" (D&C 132:63; cf. v. 31). One of the most popular and important scriptural passages in the Church is found in the Pearl of Great Price. The Lord explained to Moses the purpose of creation and existence: "For behold, this is my work and my glory—to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of man" (Moses 1:39). That the Prophet understood early in his ministry that God's progression and development was accomplished through the exaltation of his children, is evident from an early recording of Moses 1:39. Note a variant rendering of this statement in the Prophet's first draft of the Bible translation: "Behold, this is my work TO my glory, to the immortality and eternal life of man." fn In short, God's work—creating worlds without number, peopling them with his spirit sons and daughters, and providing the truths of the gospel for their edification and salvation (Moses 1:27-38)—not only benefits his children, but further glorifies himself. In speaking by the inspiration of the Lord, Joseph the Prophet explained the following in the famous King Follett Sermon on 7 April 1844:

 

What did Jesus do? Why; I do the things I saw my Father do when worlds came rolling into existence. My Father worked out his kingdom with fear and trembling, and I must do the same; and when I get my kingdom, I shall present it to my Father, so that he may obtain kingdom upon kingdom, and it will exalt him in glory. He will then take a higher exaltation, and I will take his place, and thereby become exalted myself. So that Jesus treads in the tracks of his Father, and inherits what God did before; and God is thus glorified and exalted in the salvation and exaltation of all his children. fn

 

Notes A New and Everlasting Covenants

 

1. JD 2:90.

 

2. Mormon Doctrine, 2nd ed. (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1966), pp. 529-30.

 

3. The minutes of the Davis Stake Conference, published under "Plural Marriage," in Millennial Star 16:454; cited by Danel Bachman in "New Light on an Old Hypothesis: The Ohio Origins of the Revelation on Eternal Marriage," Journal of Mormon History 5 (1978): 22.

 

4. Robert J. Matthews, A Plainer Translation: Joseph Smith's Translation of the Bible, A History and Commentary (Provo: Brigham Young University Press, 1975), pp. 96, 257.

 

5. HC 5:xxix-xxx.

 

6. Millennial Star, 9 December 1878, p. 788; cited in Matthews, A Plainer Translation, p. 258.

 

7. JD 11:221.

 

8. "Scenes and Incidents in Nauvoo," Woman's Exponent 10 (1 November 1881): 83.

 

9. The Historical Record, pp. 225-26; cited in Hyrum M. Smith and Janne M. Sjodahl, Doctrine and Covenants Commentary (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Company, reprint 1965), pp 820-21.

 

10. Cited in Lyndon W. Cook, The Revelations of the Prophet Joseph Smith (Provo, Ut.: Seventy's Mission Bookstore, 1981), p. 294.

 

11. See "New Light on an Old Hypothesis," pp. 19-32.

 

12. A concubine was a wife who came from a position of lower social standing, and who thus did not enjoy the same status as one of higher birth. Under ancient practice, where caste systems were much more common than at present, a man could take a slave or non-citizen as a legal wife, but it was understood that she was of a lower status. This was the case with Sarah (the first wife) and Hagar (the servant who became a concubine).

 

13. TPJS, pp. 300-1.

 

14. See Bruce R. McConkie, Doctrinal New Testament Commentary, 3 vols. (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1966-73), 1:604-6; The Mortal Messiah, 4 books (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1979-81), 3:374-81.

 

15. TPJS, p. 312.

 

16. Doctrinal New Testament Commentary, 3:335-36.

 

17. TPJS, pp. 149-50.

 

18. McConkie, Mormon Doctrine, p. 110.

 

19. TPJS, p. 299.

 

20. Ibid., p. 128.

 

21. Doctrinal New Testament Commentary, 3:343.

 

22. Mormon Doctrine, p. 108.

 

23. McConkie, Doctrinal New Testament Commentary, 3:161, 345; The Mortal Messiah, 2:216.

 

24. Lectures on Faith, Lec. #6, Par. 10.

 

25. For detail concerning Joseph Smith receiving the fulness of the priesthood, see Ronald K. Esplin, "Joseph, Brigham, and the Twelve: A Succession of Continuity," Brigham Young University Studies 21.3 (Summer 1981): 30141; Andrew F. Ehat, "Joseph Smith's Introduction of Temple Ordinances and the 1844 Mormon Succession Question," Unpublished Master's Thesis, Brigham Young University, 1982.

 

26. TPJS, p, 324.

 

27. Ibid., p. 137

 

28. From Dean C. Jessee, The Personal Writings of Joseph Smith (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1984), pp. 507-9; see also HC 5:134-36; TPJS, pp. 255-57.

 

29. See Old Testament Manuscript #2 in Matthews, A Plainer Translation, p. 222, emphasis added.

 

30. TPJS, pp. 347-48.

 

 

 

(Robert L. Millet and Kent P. Jackson, eds., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 1: The Doctrine and Covenants [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1989], 512.)

 

 

D&C 132:15-16 – Civil marriage is not in force when dead.  These are appointed angels.

 

D&C 132:19-20 – If a couple is married by the new and everlasting covenant of marriage and sealed by the Holy Spirit of Promise ( a sealer does not do this!, rather it is the power of Elijah that does this).

They come forth in the 1st resurrection and have all power from God.

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 132:20.)

 

20 Then shall they be gods, because they have no end; therefore shall they be from everlasting to everlasting, because they continue; then shall they be above all, because all things are subject unto them. Then shall they be gods, because they have all power, and the angels are subject unto them.

 

 

(Ephesians 1:12-13.)

 

12 That we should be to the praise of his glory, who first trusted in Christ.

 

13 In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise,

 

(Ephesians 4:30.)

 

30 And grieve not the holy Spirit of God, whereby ye are sealed unto the day of redemption.

 

 

 

Holy Spirit of Promise

 

The Holy Spirit of Promise is one of many descriptive name-titles of the Holy Ghost and refers to a specific function of the Holy Ghost. In John 14:16, the Savior, who had been a comforter to his disciples, assured them that after his departure into heaven they would receive another comforter: “And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever.” The next verse speaks of this Comforter as “the Spirit of truth,” who “dwelleth with you, and shall be in you” (verse 17). The Lord subsequently identified this promised Comforter as the Holy Ghost (verse 26). Doctrine and Covenants 88:3 reiterates and clarifies: “Wherefore, I now send upon you another Comforter, even upon you my friends, that it may abide in your hearts, even the Holy Spirit of promise; which other Comforter is the same that I promised unto my disciples, as is recorded in the testimony of John.”

 

The Holy Spirit of Promise is the power by which ordinances and other righteous acts performed on this earth, such as baptism and eternal marriage, are ratified, validated, and sealed in heaven as well as on earth. Paul taught the Ephesians that after acting on their faith in Christ they “were sealed with that Holy Spirit of promise,” which was the surety of their “inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession” (Eph. 1:12-14). The sealing of earthly covenants and performances is conditional and depends upon the recipient’s personal commitment and worthiness. If a person who has received the Holy Spirit of Promise subsequently becomes unrighteous, the seal is broken until full repentance and forgiveness occur (DS 1:55; 2:94-99).

 

The necessity of sealing by the Holy Ghost is emphasized in the following passage: “All covenants, contracts, bonds, obligations, oaths, vows, performances, connections, associations, or expectations, that are not made and entered into and sealed by the Holy Spirit of promise,…are of no efficacy, virtue, or force in and after the resurrection from the dead; for all contracts that are not made unto this end have an end when men are dead” (D&C 132:7). Earthly representatives of the Lord, such as bishops and elders may be deceived by an unworthy person, but no one can deceive the Holy Spirit, who will not ratify an ordinance received unworthily. This safeguard is attached to all blessings and covenants associated with the gospel of Jesus Christ.

 

The ultimate manifestation of the Holy Spirit of Promise is in connection with having one’s calling and election made sure-that is, receiving “the more sure word of prophecy” testifying that an individual is sealed up to eternal life (D&C 131:5D&C 131:5). The Holy Spirit of Promise validates this blessing or seals it upon the person. Referring to the Holy Spirit of Promise the Lord says, “This Comforter is the promise which I give unto you of eternal life, even the glory of the Celestial Kingdom” (D&C 88:4; cf. MD, pp. 361-62).

 

Bibliography

McConkie, Bruce R. Doctrinal New Testament Commentary, Vol. 3, pp. 333-37. Salt Lake City, 1973.

LAWRENCE R. FLAKE

 

 

(Encyclopedia of Mormonism, 1-4 vols., edited by Daniel H. Ludlow (New York: Macmillan, 1992), 651.)

 

 

“I will make an explanation of the expression, ‘Sealed by the Holy Spirit of Promise.’ This does not have reference to marriage for time and all eternity only, but to every ordinance and blessing of the gospel. Baptism into the Church is sealed by this Spirit, likewise confirmation, ordination, and all ordinances as well as marriage for time and all eternity.

 

“The meaning of this expression is this: Every covenant, contract, bond, obligation, oath, vow, and performance that man receives through the covenants and blessings of the gospel is sealed by the Holy Spirit with a promise. The promise is that the blessing will be obtained, if those who seek it are true and faithful to the end. If they are not faithful, then the Holy Spirit will withdraw the blessing, and the promise comes to an end. [D&C 76:50-54; 88:3-5; 124:124; 132:7; Moses 6:60.]” (Joseph Fielding Smith, DS 2:94.)

 

“The Lord . . . said that a man and wife who are sealed by the Holy Spirit of promise shall pass by the angels and gods that are set there to their exaltation and glory in all things, as has been sealed upon their heads. [132:19.]

 

“In an explanation of what it means to be sealed by the Holy Spirit of promise, one of our brethren said this: ‘While we receive eternal blessings at the hands of the priesthood which has the right to seal on earth and it shall be sealed in the heavens, this revelation clearly states that it must be sealed by the Holy Spirit of promise also. A man and woman may by fraud and deception obtain admittance to the House of the Lord and may receive the pronouncement of the holy priesthood, giving to them so far as lies in their power these blessings. We may deceive men but we cannot deceive the Holy Ghost, and our blessings will not be eternal unless they are also sealed by the Holy Spirit of promise. The Holy Ghost is one who reads the thoughts and hearts of men, and gives his sealing approval to the blessings pronounced upon their heads. Then it is binding, efficacious, and of full force.’ “ (Harold B. Lee, IE, December 1970, p. 105.)

 

 

(Daniel H. Ludlow, A Companion to Your Study of the Doctrine and Covenants, 2 vols. [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1978], 1: 661.)

 

 

D&C 132:24 – Come to know God, Eternal Lives (posterity), Come to know God as a parent, by being a parent.

 

D&C 118 – There were vacancies in the Quorum of the 12 because of apostasy.  4 needed to be replaced.  God will provide for the families of those who were faithful and were preaching to the world, verse 3, 6.

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 118:2-6.)

 

 Verily, thus saith the Lord: Let a conference be held immediately; let the Twelve be organized; and let men be appointed to supply the place of those who are fallen.

 

2 Let my servant Thomas remain for a season in the land of Zion, to publish my word.

 

3 Let the residue continue to preach from that hour, and if they will do this in all lowliness of heart, in meekness and humility, and long-suffering, I, the Lord, give unto them a promise that I will provide for their families; and an effectual door shall be opened for them, from henceforth.

 

4 And next spring let them depart to go over the great waters, and there promulgate my gospel, the fulness thereof, and bear record of my name.

 

5 Let them take leave of my saints in the city of Far West, on the twenty-sixth day of April next, on the building-spot of my house, saith the Lord.

 

6 Let my servant John Taylor, and also my servant John E. Page, and also my servant Wilford Woodruff, and also my servant Willard Richards, be appointed to fill the places of those who have fallen, and be officially notified of their appointment.

 

On 8 July, in answer to the query “Show us thy will, O Lord, concerning the Twelve” (headnote), another revelation, now Doctrine and Covenants 118, imparted firm direction and new life to the Quorum of the Twelve. “Let men be appointed to supply the place of those who are fallen,” declared the revelation (v. 1), which concluded by naming John Taylor, John E. Page, Wilford Woodruff, and Willard Richards to the Twelve. Thomas Marsh was to “remain for a season in the land of Zion,” where he was now coeditor with Joseph of the Elder’s Journal, “to publish my word” (v. 2) . The others were to resume preaching and, as a quorum, prepare for a spring 1839 mission abroad. They would depart, continued the revelation, from the Far West temple site on 26 April, the very day an earlier revelation (see D&C 115) had named for laying the temple cornerstone.

 

Verse 1 of Doctrine and Covenants 118, given 8 July 1838, announced: “Let a conference be held immediately; let the Twelve be organized; and let men be appointed to supply the place of those who have fallen.”

 

Verse 2 then authorized President Marsh to remain in Far West, Missouri, “for a season.” This was not a choice between Kirtland and Missouri, as before in Doctrine and Covenants 112, but between staying for a time in Far West and going abroad immediately. Verse 3 instructed “the residue,” the other apostles who had remained faithful or who had returned to full fellowship, to “continue to preach from that hour.” It promised that if they would do this “in all lowliness of heart, in meekness and humility, and long-suffering,” they could still fulfill their divine mission (that is, despite disaster and division they had not yet lost the possibility of fulfilling their destiny) “and an effectual door shall be opened for them, from henceforth” (emphasis added; compare D&C 112:19).

 

Moreover, if they were thus faithful they had another promise, that while they were serving abroad, “I will provide for their families” (v. 3).

 

Verses 4 and 5 instructed that “next spring let them [the residue and the new] depart to go over the great waters, and there promulgate my gospel [in Britain]. . . . Let them take leave of my saints in the city of Far West, on the twenty-sixth day of April next, on the building spot of my house, saith the Lord.”

 

The revelation closed, with verse 6, by naming those “appointed to fill the places of those who have fallen”: John Taylor, John E. Page, Wilford Woodruff, and Willard Richards.

 

The following day, the apostles, for the first time in months, held a formal quorum meeting. They agreed to notify immediately the four new apostles, none of whom were in Far West, and to prepare for their mission abroad. The anticipated ordination of new apostles, the return from England later in the month of Elders Kimball and Hyde, and this renewal of their commission to carry the gospel to the nations seemed to portend a new day for Marsh’s shattered quorum. The command had been given, the date was known: finally President Marsh would have the opportunity to lead his colleagues abroad.

 

But it was not to be. Before the spring mission, indeed even before existing vacancies could be filled, there would be two more, one when David Patten was killed during the violence that soon erupted in northern Missouri, and the other caused by the disaffection of President Marsh himself, also in some ways a by product of that same Missouri conflict.

 

Marsh’s disillusionment and decision to leave the Church were the result of many factors, having to do with pride, misunderstanding, hurt feelings, suspicion, and, in Marsh’s own later words, stubbornness and a loss of the Spirit. Fn Troubled of mind and spirit, feeling himself wavering, he humbled himself before the Lord in his printing shop long enough to receive a revelation about what course he should take. After sharing it with Heber Kimball and Brigham Young, he promptly went out and did the opposite. Once his face was set, the stubborn, inflexible Thomas was not a man who could be turned. By removing himself from the Saints he escaped the violence that soon decimated Far West and drove his coreligionists from Missouri, but at what cost? As he eventually came to acknowledge, his loss was the greater.

 

From Liberty Jail, the Prophet named George A. Smith to fill the vacancy created by the death of Elder Patten, but Marsh’s position remained vacant for nearly three years. In the meantime, under the direction of President Brigham Young, now senior apostle, the available apostles—William Smith was not to be found, Parley Pratt was in prison, Willard Richards was in England—boldly returned to Missouri, whence they had so recently escaped, to fulfill the July 1838 revelation (D&C 118:1D&C 118) requiring them to depart 26 April 1839 from “the building-spot of my house” in Far West.

 

Enemies had boasted that the revelation proved Joseph Smith a false prophet because it could not be fulfilled. So certain were they that no one would attempt it that they did not even bother to post a guard. Perhaps, under the circumstances, the Lord would “take the will for the deed,” some Latter-day Saints urged, but Brigham Young and his associates would not allow even supposed failure to stand as a witness against Joseph. In the predawn hours they and a small group of Saints sang hymns, ordained two apostles, laid a symbolic cornerstone, excommunicated dissidents, and departed before the first surprised anti-Mormon reached the site.

 

From Far West the apostles returned to the new city building in Illinois on the banks of the Mississippi to complete their preparations and to situate their families as well as possible before departing. Instead of keeping them at arm’s length as had often been the case in Kirtland, Joseph Smith embraced them, instructed them, blessed them, and participated fully in their preparations. No one, however, had means to help their families. Destitute after the Missouri tragedy, without adequate shelter or provisions, everyone suffered—the more so when summer diseases befell them in the damp, sickly hollows along the river. Consequently, it was a great test of faith to leave their families in such circumstances in order to fulfill their mission. Because they understood that the Church could provide little help, essentially they left their families in the hands of God to embark on a mission that could not be postponed and which would eventually transform the Church. The apostles did not forget that the revelation commanding their departure also declared: “I . . . give unto them a promise that I will provide for their families” (D&C 118:3). As Brigham Young wrote to his wife from England, though he longed to be able to administer to their needs, he had faith enough not to be unduly concerned, “for the Lord said by the mouth of Brother Joseph, that they should be provided for, and I believed it.” Fn

 

The result of this sacrifice, of obedience in difficult circumstances, and of diligent efforts to labor together with unity and harmony was perhaps the most successful single mission in the history of the Church. As Elder Jeffrey R. Holland noted after reading a recent book on the subject, after this mission, “neither this group of men, the British Isles, nor the Church would ever be the same again.” Fn Finally the Twelve had fulfilled the promise inherent in their calling that had so eluded them during the years under President Marsh.

 

The rewards for service are many and often individualized. No doubt each of the apostles received assurances and blessings fitted to his needs, as suggested by Doctrine and Covenants 82:10: “I, the Lord, am bound when ye do what I say; but when ye do not what I say, ye have no promise.” Doctrine and Covenants 126, the last section in our story, simply preserves one example: the knowledge that service is acceptable to the Lord: “My servant Brigham,” began the revelation, given 9 July 1841, “it is no more required at your hand to leave your family as in times past, for your offering is acceptable to me.” Verse 2 affirmed that “I have seen your labor and toil . . . for my name” and, verse 3: “I therefore command you to send my word abroad [from now on send, rather than take it], and take especial care of your family.”

 

Under Brigham Young, the “new” Quorum of the Twelve proved competent and fiercely loyal to Joseph and his principles and rendered extraordinary service at great sacrifice. After shared experiences in Britain molded this new quorum into an effective, united body of power, they returned home at a time when the Prophet’s needs for loyal assistance had multiplied. The result, announced by Joseph Smith on 16 August 1841, was a significant realignment of assignment and authority, with the Twelve taking their place next to the First Presidency in managing all Church affairs. The ambiguity between the high councils and the Twelve that had so vexed Thomas Marsh and the apostles in Kirtland was over. The apostles had completed their preparation and the Prophet judged them, to use Brigham Young’s phrase, “fit for power.” What Thomas Marsh had dreamed of was now reality.

 

Throughout his service as president of the Twelve, Thomas Marsh had thought it his special mission to lead his quorum in taking the gospel abroad, and the July 1838 revelation (D&C 118:1D&C 118), a few months before his apostasy, reaffirmed that mission. His 1857 letter to Heber Kimball pleading for readmission revealed that nineteen years later he still remembered: “I know what I have done a mission was laid upon me & I have never filled it and now I fear it is too late but it is filled by another, I see, the Lord could get along very well without me and He has lost nothing by my falling out of the ranks; But O what have I lost?” fn

 

Had Thomas B. Marsh remained faithful in 1838, he would have led the Quorum of the Twelve to England instead of Brigham Young and he would have presided over the “new quorum” and the “new role”—the one he had so impatiently longed for—that resulted from that mission. All this occurred, instead, without him.

 

 

(Byron R. Merrill et al., comps., The Heavens Are Open: The 1992 Sperry Symposium on the Doctrine and Covenants and Church History [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1993], 124.)

 

 

Abrahamic test – Will you do what God asks regardless of your thoughts or feelings otherwise?  The 12 fulfilled the prophesy and completed what God asked them to do in dedicating the temple site at Far West!

 

D&C 119 – Put your money in what you believe in.

 

"A Standing Law Forever"

(D&C 119 and 120)

 

STEPHEN D. RICKS

 

In response to Joseph Smith's prayer, "O Lord, show unto thy servants how much thou requirest of the properties of thy people for a tithing," fn he received on 8 July 1838 at Far West, Missouri what is now section 119 of the Doctrine and Covenants. Here the Lord directed the Saints to place their surplus property "into the hands of the bishop of my church in Zion" (D&C 119:1). Thereafter, "those who have thus been tithed shall pay one-tenth of all their interest annually; and this shall be a standing law unto them forever" (D&C 119:4). Ten days later, on 18 July 1838, Joseph Smith received a further revelation (the current section 120 of the Doctrine and Covenants) directing that the tithes collected "be disposed of by a council, composed of the First Presidency of my Church, and of the bishop and his council, and by my high council; and by mine own voice unto them." Such payment of one-tenth of one's increase for the support of the community or the maintenance of its religious institutions is a well-attested practice, both among Christians as well as in Ancient Israel. fn

 

Tithing In The Latter-day Church

 

The words "tithing," "tithe," and "tithed" are mentioned several times in the Doctrine and Covenants prior to section 119. In section 64, for example (revealed 11 September 1831 at Kirtland, Ohio), the following is recorded: "Behold, now it is called today until the coming of the Son of Man, and verily it Is a day of sacrifice, and a day for the tithing of my people; for he that is tithed shall not be burned at his coming" (D&C 64:23). Similarly, in D&C 97:11-12 (received 2 August 1833) we read: "Yea, let it [i.e., the Kirtland Temple] be built speedily by the tithing of my people. Behold this is the tithing and the sacrifice which I, the Lord, require at their hands, that there may be a house built unto me for the salvation of Zion" (cf. also D&C 85:3). In all of these instances the word tithing seems to be used not in its etymological sense of "tenth," but rather in the more general sense of "contribution" or "offering." fn Even in D&C 119:4, the word "tithed" seems to be used in other than its root sense: "Those who have thus been tithed [i.e., by having placed their surplus property into the hands of the bishop] shall pay one-tenth of all their interest annually." But this verse makes equally clear that from this time on it is required of the Saints to "tithe" (i.e., to pay one-tenth) of their yearly increase.

 

Already before the giving of D&C 119, Joseph and Oliver had promised (in a manner not altogether unlike the patriarch Jacob in Gen. 28:20-22) to give a tenth to the Lord in fulfillment of a vow. While suffering because of their debts in 1834, Joseph and Oliver vowed in solemn prayer to the Lord:

 

That if the Lord will prosper us in our business and open the way before us that we may obtain means to pay our debts; that we be not troubled nor brought into disrepute before the world, nor His people; after that, of all that He shall give unto us we will give a tenth to be bestowed upon the poor of His Church, or as He shall command; and that we will be faithful over that which He has entrusted to our care, that we may obtain much; and that our children after us shall remember to observe this sacred and holy covenant; and that our children and our children's children, may know of the same. fn

 

This vow was, however, personal, and not binding on the membership of the Church as a whole.

 

There are similarities between the Law of Consecration and certain stipulations in the revelation on tithing in D&C 119:1-2 (which was revealed in 1838). In the revelation on tithing, the Saints were directed to place their surplus property "into the hands of the bishop of my church in Zion" (D&C 119:1). The Law of Consecration, on the other hand (which was revealed in 1831), had required that each member consecrate his property to the Church and receive in return a stewardship based on his wants and needs (D&C 42:30-32). In both cases, however, one's residue or surplus would have remained entrusted to the Church. fn Still, as Brigham Young noted, this new principle "seemingly was not fully understood or practiced." fn With his characteristic rhetorical flair and keen insight into the foibles of human nature, Brigham described in 1855 his experiences in seeing to the carrying out of the requirements of the revelation.

 

I found the people said they were willing to do about as they were counselled, but upon asking them about their surplus property, most of the men who owned land and cattle would say, "I have got so many hundred acres of land, and I have got so many boys, and I want each of them to have eighty acres, therefore this is not surplus property." Again, "I have got so many girls, and I do not believe I shall be able to give them more than forty acres each." "Well, you have got two or three hundred acres left." "Yes, but I have a brother-in-law coming on, and he will depend on me for a living; my wife's nephew is also coming on, he is poor, and I shall have to furnish him a farm after he arrives here." I would go on to the next one, and he would have more land and cattle than he could make us of to advantage. It is a laughable idea, but is nevertheless true, men would tell me they were young and beginning in the world, and would say, "We have no children, but our prospects are good, and we think we shall have a family of children, and if we do, we want to give them eighty acres of land each; we have no surplus property." "How many cattle have you?" "So many." "How many horses, &c?" "So many, but I have made provisions for all these, and I have use for everything I have got."

 

Some were disposed to do right with their surplus property, and once in a while you would find a man who had a cow which he considered surplus, but generally she was of the class that would kick a person's hat off, or eyes out, or the wolves had eaten off her teats. You would once in a while find a man who had a horse that he considered surplus, but at the same time he had the ringbone, was broken-winded, spavined in both legs, and had the pole evil at one end of the neck and a fistula at the other, and both knees sprung. fn

 

In a similar vein, Orson Pratt said, "Who in the world among all the Latter-day Saints would have any surplus property if it is left to his own judgment?" fn Although some may not have understood or obeyed the principle, the History of the Church records some three weeks after D&C 119 was revealed that "many of the brethren . . . consecrated their surplus property according to the revelation." fn

 

Perhaps because many of the Saints had difficulty in determining what was "surplus property," thereafter the "Law of Tithing" (as it was referred to in the "Eleventh General Epistle of the Presidency of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints" in 1854) was given, "which required that all should in the first instance pay one-tenth of their entire property into the Church, and thereafter pay one-tenth of all their increase; which was for the poor, to promote the spread of the Gospel among the nations of the earth, support the ministry, and building of Temples unto the Most High." fn In "An Epistle of the Twelve Apostles to the Saints of the Last Days," dated 13 December 1841, the Twelve wrote with regard to the proposed temple at Nauvoo that it should "be built by tithing and consecration, and every one is at liberty to consecrate all they find in their hearts so to do; but the tithings required, is one-tenth of all anyone possessed at the commencement of the building, and one-tenth part of all his increase from that time until the completion of the same, whether it be money, or whatever he may be blessed with." fn Those who had nothing else to tithe were expected to donate every tenth day of labor on the temple. Franklin D. Richards, recounting his experiences in the building of the Nauvoo temple, said that "the tithing of the people on that Temple was mostly in labor as I well recollect—for I worked in the quarry every tenth day when I was not absent on missionary service." fn

 

While the Saints are no longer required to deed their surplus property to the Church, and are no longer generally expected to tithe their entire property at the outset, the principle of tithing has remained a significant part of the Church's economic organization. Whereas today the majority of tithing is given in the form of cash payments, there were several means of payment in the early years following the receipt of the revelation in section 119, each of which comprised a significant percentage of the total tithing contribution. Leonard Arrington, former Church Historian, has described these various means of donating tithing in fair detail in Great Basin Kingdom; fn here each of the major categories will be mentioned only briefly.

 

1. Property Tithing. As has been noted above, this consisted of a ten percent assessment on all property owned by the member at the time that he began to pay and ten percent of his annual increase afterwards. This was first required of the Saints in connection with the construction of the temple at Nauvoo and was reinvoked at the General Conference in Salt Lake City on 7 September 1851. fn

 

2. Labor Tithing. Saints were expected to donate one day of labor in ten for work on various projects, such as temples and other church buildings, as well as forts, roads, and the like. As the "Epistle of the Twelve Apostles to the Saints of the Last Days" noted above makes clear, even if members had insufficient means to pay other forms of tithing, no able-bodied Saint was to be exempted from labor tithing. fn However, at least after the removal of the Saints to the West, those who wished to and had the means could have labor tithing performed by others if proper compensation were made and the animals used for the work were maintained. In 1863, when there was difficulty in obtaining sufficient labor tithing for work on the temple in Salt Lake, Brigham Young noted in an address in that year that "I immediately put on the work two good mule teams with a good man to manage each, then I put on two good common laborers to work on this block; I feed, clothe and pay the men, sustain the teams and keep the wagons in repair." fn

 

3. Produce and Stock Tithing. Somewhat in the tradition of Lev. 27:30-33, tithes were to be paid on all increase in products of the household, farm, ranch, or mine.

 

4. Institutional Tithing. Concerns such as stores and factories were expected to pay a tenth on their earned profits to the Church. Arrington refers to this tithing as "a kind of forerunner of the modern corporate profits tax." fn

 

5. Cash Tithing. During the nineteenth century, cash payments of tithing represented only a fraction of the Church's total tithing income. However, cash tithing was particularly encouraged at that time because of the relative infrequency of its payment and its easy liquidity outside of the Great Basin. fn

 

In what is now section 120 of the Doctrine and Covenants, the distribution of tithes is made the responsibility of "a council, composed of the First Presidency of my Church, and of the bishop and his council, and by mine own high council." Although the "high council" no longer plays a role in the disbursement of tithes, both the First Presidency and "the bishop and his council" (more recently, the Presiding Bishopric) have retained their responsibilities in this regard. They constitute the Council on the Disposition of Tithes.

 

Conclusion

 

The revelation in the Doctrine and Covenants directs that tithing be "a standing law unto them forever" (D&C 119:4). Without attempting to determine whether the practice of tithing is an eternal principle—the position which Brigham Young seems to take fn—or whether it might be abroagated in favor of a "higher law," such as the Law of Consecration and Stewardship—the position of Joseph F. Smith fn—this phrase may, I think, be understood in the sense that, just as tithing has been observed in previous dispensations, it remains the minimum which the Lord requires, or will require, of his Saints in this dispensation. It would be incorrect to assume (as happened in the Christian church in postapostolic times) that by paying tithes the Christian had fully discharged his obligation to the Lord and his kingdom. fn The Lord frequently exhorted his followers to forsake all in order to gain eternal life. While the payment of tithes remains a significant part of building the Lord's kingdom, it does not exhaust the ways in which the Saint may expend his means, energy, time, and talents in serving the Lord's cause.

 

Notes "A Standing Law Forever"

 

1. HC 3:44.

 

2. See Stephen D. Ricks, "Tithing in Ancient and Modern Israel," pp. 205-17 in Hearken, O Ye People: Discourses on the Doctrine and Covenants (Salt Lake City: Randall Book Co., 1984).

 

3. The Modern English word "tithe" derives from the Old English teogotha, "tenth." A similar use of "tithing" in the general sense of "contribution" can be found in Donald Q. Cannon and Lyndon W. Cook, eds., Far West Record (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1983), pp. 129-31.

 

4. HC 2:175.

 

5. Leonard J. Arrington, Feramorz Y. Fox, and Dean L. May, Building the City of God (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1976), p. 34.

 

6. "Eleventh General Epistle of the Presidency of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints," Millennial Star 16:27 (8 July 1854), p. 427; for a convenient source for the epistle, see James R. Clark, ed., Messages of the First Presidency, 6 vols. (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1965-75), 2:139.

 

7. JD 2:306-7.

 

8. JD 16:157; cf. JD 17:110.

 

9. In the entry under the date of Thursday, 26 July 1838, in HC 3:47.

 

10. "Eleventh General Epistle," Clark, Messages of the First presidency, 2:139.

 

11. "An Epistle of the Twelve Apostles to the Saints of the Last Days," HC 4:473.

 

12. JD 23:3 14.

 

13. The following discussion is heavily dependent on the description of the various categories of tithing in Leonard J. Arrington's Great Basin Kingdom (Lincoln, Neb.: University of Nebraska Press, 1958), pp. 133-37.

 

14. "Sixth General Epistle of the Presidency of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints," Millennial Star 14:2 (15 January 1852), p. 25.

 

15. HC 4:473-74.

 

16. JD 10:205.

 

17. Arrington, Great Basin Kingdom, p. 137.

 

18. Ibid., 136-37.

 

19. Thus, Brigham Young declared, "The Lord Almighty never had his kingdom on the earth without the law of tithing being in the midst of his people, and he never will. It is an eternal law that God has instituted for the benefit of the human family, for their salvation and exaltation," JD 14:89; cf. JD 15:163.

 

20. See, e.g., Millennial Star 56 (29 October 1893): 386; see also Conference Report, April 1900, pp. 47-48; Lorenzo Snow, Conference Report, October 1900, pp. 61-62; JD 20:368; Orson Pratt, JD 17:109-10. For further discussion of this topic, see Robert L. Millet, "The Development of the Concept of Zion in Mormon Theology," Ph.D. Dissertation, Florida State University, April 1983, pp. 106-8.

 

21. Lukas Vischer, Tithing in the Early Church (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1966), pp. 10, 30.

 

 

(Robert L. Millet and Kent P. Jackson, eds., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 1: The Doctrine and Covenants [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1989], 456.)

 

 

D&C 121, 122, 123 – These sections were parts of a letter written by the Prophet while in Liberty jail. 

 

Brigham Young – Running the church in Nauvoo

 

Heber C. Kimball – Running the church in Far West

 

 

Ray of Light in an Hour of Darkness

(D&C 121-123)

 

JAMES R. CHRISTIANSON

 

Introduction

 

There are various plausible ways to analyze or explain events in the life of Joseph Smith. One of these might be appropriately called "the scheduling of a prophet."

 

Joseph's life prior to 1820 was crucial to events that followed that date. Those fifteen years saw him born into the right family and the correct lineage; living in a pre-determined location at the proper moment in history, and facing telling circumstances while immersed in just the right environmental mix. All of these brought him as scheduled to his appointment with destiny.

 

The decade after 1820 was equally vital. These were the formative years. Beginning with the First Vision, his course in life was remarkably endowed with experiences intended to heighten his spiritual sensitivity, deepen his understanding of the ways of the Lord, broaden his grasp of things past, present and future, and increase his capacity to assimilate truth while warding off evil and enhancing his appreciation of his role and purpose in life. To accomplish this, the heavens were opened to a degree perhaps unknown to any other mortal. Among his teachers and learning models during this period were the Savior; the prophets Moroni, John the Baptist, Peter, James, and John; the messengers Gabriel and Raphael; and a whole array of Book of Mormon characters about whom he could discourse in detailed and tireless fashion.

 

The Lord's Spokesman

 

Aided by Urim and Thummim, an effective teaching device, this was truly a time of abundant learning for the boy who metamorphosed into a prophet, the Lord's spokesman. It was this role that characterized the next period of Joseph's story. From 1830 to 1838, his life and the lives of his followers were enriched by his words as they flowed forth, the product of practically every form of revelation or inspiration.

 

With but few exceptions, the drama of the twenties was past, but a wide variety of questions were asked and needs arose, to which Joseph voiced the word and will of the Lord. With the Book of Mormon published and the priesthood restored, he took action to establish the Kingdom, firm up its foundation, and expand its borders. "Thus saith the Lord" was an awaited preamble to much of what the Prophet had to say. It preceded injunctions as common as where his disciples were to live, how they were to serve, what they should eat and drink, how they were to teach and rear their children, and made plain their responsibilities one to another. It introduced awe-inspiring declarations that defined the eternities both past and future, detailed dramatic events to precede and accompany the Second Coming, and described the glorious appearances of such personages as the Savior, Moses, Elias, and Elijah.

 

During these years it was the Lord speaking through Joseph on numerous occasions that fills the pages of much of the Doctrine and Covenants. It was a time rich with reassurance that he was the Lord's prophet and that his words and those of no other represented the word and will of God (D&C 43:1-5).

 

A Spokesman for the Lord

 

The next and final phase of Joseph's mortal experience unfolded during the years 1839 to 1844. As the Lord's spokesman, Joseph essentially relayed those things seen, heard and felt as the Spirit directed. It was as though the Lord himself had spoken through Joseph Smith; hence the words "Thus saith the Lord" or something akin to them prefaced almost all scriptural statements during the years 1830 to 1839. The fourth and final period of his life was clearly distinct from the other three. As a mature, confident prophet, Joseph knew the mind and will of the Lord and, therefore, spoke for him and his words were as though they had come directly from Diety. His declarations and writings, were spoken as "one having authority." Those that have been preserved, both the ones that do not and some that do appear in the Doctrine and Covenants, are considered among the most profound, significant, and far-reaching of his teachings. Among such are the King Follett Discourse, fn the 16 June 1844 discourse on the Godhead fn and the Temple Endowment. Available as part of the Standard Works are sections 121, 122, 123, 127, 128, 130, and 131 of the Doctrine and Covenants.

 

The latter references, considered scripture by the Church, were a significant departure from previously acknowledged revelations. They are essentially answers to gospel questions in the case of 130 and 131, while the remainder are letters to the Saints written during times when Joseph could not communicate directly with them. It is in these "epistles" that Joseph expressed himself in the full measure of his calling and was, indeed, the spokesman for the Lord.

 

The historical setting for three of these sections (121, 122, and 123) was a cold, wet, dark jail cell in Liberty, Missouri. Joseph, his brother Hyrum, and his counselor in the presidency of the Church, Sidney Rigdon, along with three of their brethren, were confined there for nearly four months, beginning 1 December 1838. The cause of their arrest and imprisonment was a charge of treason brought against them by the State of Missouri.

 

Forced to flee Kirtland, Ohio, in January 1838, due to a wave of apostasy which led to threats on his life, Joseph made his way to Far West, Missouri. fn His arrival in March 1838 was followed by several quiet but prosperous months during which a number of other settlements were established, crops were planted, additional Saints gathered, and a spirit of optimism was engendered.

 

Once again, however, as their numbers increased, misunderstandings arose and conflict soon followed. The battle of Crooked River, which resulted in bloodshed and death on both sides and in the subsequent charge of treason, was followed by the infamous Extermination Order of Missouri Governor Boggs and by an attack on the settlement of Haun's Mill. The resultant deaths of seventeen men and boys, plus the seizure through deception of Joseph and other Church leaders by the state militia, took the heart out of Latter-day Saint resistance and led to the expulsion of the Saints from the state.

 

During the five weeks that passed, from the time he was taken into custody until his confinement at Liberty Jail, Joseph, along with his fellow prisoners, was subjected to conditions and circumstances that were both humiliating and degrading. All attempts at securing a fair hearing were a distortion of justice. This experience, followed by the long winter months spent in Liberty, were distressing to the Prophet. His own miseries were compounded by reports that both his family and the Saints in general were suffering greatly. Joseph's letters during these months reflected anxiety for the well-being of his loved ones and for his followers, scattered as they were over parts of Illinois and Missouri. But they also portray transcendent expressions of confidence in and total awareness of the mission and doctrine of the kingdom which were beautifully poetic and insightful. fn It was during these months, while helplessly separated from family and friends, that Joseph experienced some of the highest highs and lowest lows of his life. It was here in the unmerciful fires of persecution that he was steeled and molded into the role of one who confidently and powerfully spoke for Deity.

 

In a letter penned just two weeks after his arrival in Liberty, Joseph gave vent to the hurt and frustration spawned by the defection to the enemy of some who in better times had been his closest associates. There were, he stated, "Renegadoes, Mormon dissenters . . . running through the world and spreading various foul and libelous reports against us thinking thereby to gain the friendship of the world because they knew that we are not of the world and that the world hates us; therefore they make a tool of these fellows by them they do all the injury they can and after that they hate them worse than they do us because they find them to be base traitors and sycophants. Such characters God hates we cannot love them the world hates them and we sometimes think the devil ought to be ashamed of them." fn This said, he went on to explain the nature of their betrayal and villainy. Among other things it was noted:

 

And now brethren we say unto you, what can we enumerate more; is not all manner of evil of every description spoken against us falsely, yea, we say unto you falsely; we have been misrepresented and misunderstood and belied and the purity of our hearts have not been known. And it is through ignorance, yea, the very depth of ignorance is the cause of it, and not only ignorance but gross wickedness on the part of some and hypocrisy also who by a long face and sanctified prayers and very pious sermons had power to lead the minds of the ignorant and unwary and thereby obtain such influence that when we approached their iniquities the devil gained great advantage and would bring great sorrow upon our heads and in fine we have waded through an ocean of tribulation, and mean abuse practiced upon us by the ill bred and ignorant such as Hinkle, Corrill, and Phelps, Avard, Reed Peck, Cleminson, and various others who are so very ignorant that they cannot appear respectable in any decent and civilized society, and whose eyes are full of adultery and cannot cease from sin. Such characters as McLellin, John Whitmer, D. Whitmer, O. Cowdery, Martin Harris, who are too mean to mention and we had liked to have forgotten them. Marsh and Hyde whose hearts are full of corruption, whose cloak of hypocrisy was not sufficient to shield them or to hold them up in the hour of trouble, who after having escaped the pollutions of the world through the knowledge of God and become again entangled and overcome the latter end is worse than the first. But it has happened unto them according to the words of the savior, the dog has returned to his vomit, and the sow that was washed to her wallowing in the mire. fn

 

As days blended into weeks and weeks into months, Joseph's naturally forgiving nature reasserted itself, and the rancur that accompanied his initial period of incarceration faded away. Visits from loved ones lightened the prisoners' burdens if the news they sometimes brought did not. By March, the Saints, those free of Missouri, were well received in Illinois. Though their future was still in doubt, they were safe from further persecution. This news must have gladdened the heart of the Prophet but did not erase questions as to why so much suffering was required.

 

A Prophetic Letter

 

It was under these circumstances on 19 March 1839, that Joseph received letters from Emma, from brothers Don Carlos and William, and from Edward Partridge. fn Each of the four reported favorably concerning the welfare of his family and the remainder of the Saints and expressed hope that they would soon be reunited. Emma's words, especially, must have touched his heart. Noting her feelings regarding their long separation and his confinement, she wrote:

 

Was it not for conscious innocence, and the direct interposition of divine mercy, I am very sure I never should have been able to have endured the scenes of suffering that I have passed through, since what is called the Militia, came into Far West, under the ever to be remembered Governor's notable order. . . . We are all well at present, except Frederick, who is quite sick. Little Alexander who is now in my arms is one of the finest little fellows, you ever saw in your life, he is so strong that with the assistance of a chair he will run all round the room . . . No one but God, knows the reflections of my mind and the feelings of my heart when I left our house and home, and almost all of everything that we possessed excepting our little children, and took my journey out of the State of Missouri, leaving you shut up in that lonesome prison. But the recollection is more than human nature ought to bear . . . The daily sufferings of our brethren in travelling and camping out nights, and those on the other side of the river would beggar the most lively description. The people in this state are very kind indeed, they are doing much more than we ever anticipated they would; I have many more things I could like to write but have not time and you may be astonished at my bad writing and incoherent manner, but you will pardon all when you reflect how hard it would be for you to write, when your hands were stiffened with hard work, and your heart convulsed with intense anxiety. But I hope there is better days to come to us yet. fn

 

The following day, the Prophet composed a long letter addressed to his scattered proselytes in general and to Bishop Partridge in particular. The writing was sent to Emma with instructions that she and his extended family should read it first and then share a copy of it with the Church. Joseph recognized that the document, containing all of what became sections 121, 122, and 123 of the Doctrine and Covenants, was no ordinary missive. He felt the inspiration of its wording, as well as the confidence and power of its message. Hence the instructions on how it was to be received and shared. fn

 

The first two pages of the letter briefly but explicitly detail the sufferings of the Saints at the hands of some Missourians. "They practice these things upon the saints," he declared, "who have done them no rong who are inocent and virtuous who loved the Lord their god and were willing to forsaik all things for Christ sake these things are awfull to relait but they are verily true it must needs bee that offences come, but WO! to them by whom they come. O God where art thou and where is the pavilion that covereth thy hiding place. . . ." fn The letter continues with vv. 1-6 of section 121. To the reader it appears that Joseph, deeply pained by the memories made fresh through his letter's review of the Missouri experience, turned to one whom he knew and asked, "Why has this thing happened?" and "Wilt Thou not stand with us?" Having relieved his pent-up anguish due in part to his own inability to respond to the needs of his people, the Prophet counseled that their sufferings were but an expression of the times leading to the Second Coming and, in time, their detractors would answer for all that they had done.

 

Following a brief summary of the fruitless and ill-advised attempts by their lawyers to have their case reviewed and the recounting of an attempted escape, Joseph noted his joy in receiving letters from Emma and others, all of which breathed

 

. . . a kind and consoling spirit we were much gratified with there contence we had been a long time without information and when we read those letters they were to our souls as the gentle air, is refreshing but our joy was mingled with greaf because of the suffering of the poor and much injured saints and we need not say to you that the flood gates of our harts were hoisted and our eyes were a fountain of tears but those who have not been inclosed in the walls of a prison without cause or provication can have but a little ideah how sweat [sweet] the voice of a friend is one token of friendship from any sorce whatever a wakens and calles into action evry simpathetick feeling it brings us in an instant evry thing that is pased it sesses [siezes] the present with a vivacity of lightning it grasps after the future with the fearsness of a tiger it rhetrogrades from one thing to an other untill finally all enmity malice and hatred and past diferances misunderstandings and mis managements be slain victoms at the feet of hope and when the hart is sufficiently contrite than the voice of inspiration steals along and whispers "my son peace be unto thy soul." fn

 

Verses 7-24 comprise the next portion of the letter. This inspired and inspiring response, intended as reassurance for the Saints, clearly assuaged Joseph's troubled spirit as well. His words following v. 25 convey a degree of understanding not previously evident. God, he noted, required a tried and purged people. Like Abraham, they had passed through the refiner's fire.

 

The Prophet allowed that in his absence decisions had to be made but warned against the sophistry of aspiring, foolish, and prideful individuals. "The things of God," he wrote, "are of deep import; and time, and experience, and careful and ponderous and solom thought can only find them out. Thy mind, O man! if thou wilt lead a soul unto salvation, must stretch as high as the utmost heavens, and search into and contemplate the darkest abyss, and the broad expanse of eternity—thou must commune with God." fn

 

Joseph pursued this theme, instructing the Saints as to what the Lord expects of those, "called to hold the keys of the mysteries of those things that have been kept hid from the foundation of the world until now." He admonished them that "honesty, and sobriety, and candor, and solemnity, and virtue, and pureness, and meekness, and simplicity crown our heads in every place; and in fine become as little children, without malice, guile, or hypocrisy." If after all they had suffered they would do these things, he wrote, exercising faith and prayer in the sight of God, "He shall give unto you knowledge by His Holy Spirit." fn This citation introduces vv. 26-32, which are in turn followed by a brief statement describing the futility of those whose actions temporarily misrepresent or distort an accurate reflection of the truth in the same manner that flood waters pollute the pure and crystal-clear quality of a stream.

 

In v. 33 Joseph asked, "How long can rolling waters remain impure? What power shall stay the heavens?" He then went on to answer these questions, declaring that Governor Boggs of Missouri and other "renegados, liars, priests, thieves, and murderers" had "poured down, from their spiritual wickedness in high places, and from their strongholds of the devil, a flood of dirt and mire and filthiness and vomit upon our heads." fn This, however, did not signal the closing of the heavens, but would rather effect a purging and cleansing of the Church. All Hell, he testified,

 

may poor forth its rage like the burning lavy of mount versuvias or of Etna or of the most terible of the burning mountains and yet shall mormonism stand. watter, fire, truth, and god are all the same truth is [as] mormonism God is the author of it he is our shield it is by him we received our birth, it was by his voice that we were called to a dispensation of his gospel in the begining of the fullness of times it was by him we received the book of mormon and it was by him that we remain unto this day and by him we shall remain if it shall be for our glory and in his almighty name we are determined to indure tribulation as good soldiers unto the end. fn

 

With this, plus a request for news from various Church leaders and any who cared to write, the letter was concluded and signed by each of the prisoners: Joseph, Hyrum, Lyman Wight, Caleb Baldwin, and Alexander McRae.

 

Having apparently reviewed and corrected his epistle and possibly after re-reading the correspondence from Emma and others, Joseph determined that he had more to say. After once again enlisting the services of Alexander McRae as scribe, he proceeded to dictate several additional pages.

 

Addressing himself to the desperate need for a site where his people might gather, Joseph encouraged Bishop Partridge and other leading brethren to pursue the land offer extended by Isaac Galland. He was impressed that Galland was genuinely interested in the welfare of the Church members. He was likewise hopeful that the Governor, Attorney General, and United States Surveyor for the State of Iowa might act in ways that would benefit the Saints.

 

It was, he noted, deeply impressed upon his and his companions' minds that any door opened might be viewed as an act of providence for which the Church must be both ready and worthy. The "terrible storms." and "thick darkness" as spoken of by the prophets were not far off and great care must be taken "lest you grieve the holy spirit which shall be poured out at all times upon your heads when you are exercised with those principals of ritiousness that are agreeable to the mind of God." fn

 

These principles would be violated, Joseph warned, should "there be any among you who aspire after their own aggraundisement and seek their own oppulance while their brethren are groping in poverty." Care should be given, he wrote that their hearts not be open to "such high mindedness." Otherwise a condition would prevail wherein "there are many called but few are chosen." fn

 

At this point, the letter proclaimed the exquisite discourse that comprises the last twelve verses of section 121. Here Joseph speaks with an authority and clarity that is distinctive and sets this segment of his epistle apart from the thoughts which introduce it. It has been said of the Prophet that at times he out-transcended the prominent transcendentalists of his day: Emerson, Thoreau, Alcott, and Parker. Surely this was one of those occasions.

 

Section 122 takes up where 121 ends, and though directed to the Saints, it is given as an individual experience—most likely a burst of insight or comprehension which came as he dictated the letter, all the while pondering past events that made it necessary and the circumstances from which it was emerging. It is, nevertheless, stated in a manner that each member upon reading it or hearing it read could identify with its message in a personal way. Though included here, it is closely identified with those parts of the letter which now appear as vv. 1-25 of section 121. The following lines appear immediately after the last verse of section 122:

 

Now Brotheren, I would sejest for the consideration of the conference of its being carefully and wisely understod by the council or conference that our brethren scattered abroad who understand the spirit of the gethering that they fall into the places of refuge and safty that God shall open unto them between Kirtland and Far West. . . . And again we further sejest for the consideration of the council that there be no organizations of large bodies upon common stock princepals in property or of large companies of firms untill the Lord shall signify it in a proper maner as it opens such a dredfull field of the avaricious and the indolent and corrupt hearted to pray upon the inocent and virtious and honest we have reason to believe that many things were introduced among the saints before God had signified the times and not withstanding the principles and plans may have been good yet aspiring men or in other words men who had not the substance of Godliness about them perhaps undertook to handle edge tools children you know are fond of tools while they are not yet able to use them. Time and experience however is the only safe remidy against such evils. fn

 

This passage is valuable not only for what it contains but also for the stark comparison it reveals between the words of the Prophet when, as on this occasion, he addressed a highly spiritual matter and then turned to one of more secular significance. Extracted from the original it also exposes the weakness that characterized the language and writing skills of both Joseph and his scribe, Alexander McRae. The letter was edited before it was published in the Times and Seasons in May, 1840. The excerpting of those portions that became sections 121, 122, and 123 was by Orson Pratt in 1876.

 

Section 123 follows the above excerpt. The letter is then concluded with an appeal to the Saints to avoid secret oaths and organizations of every kind. Referring to the "wickedness of Doctor Avard," he asked that "our covenant be that of the everlasting covenant" and added that "pure friendship always becomes weakened the very moment you undertake to make it stronger by penal oaths and secrecy." fn

 

In closing, Joseph declared that the allegiance of the Saints should be to God and to the Constitution. On this subject after all that he and the Saints had endured, he testified boldly:

 

We say that the constitution of the Unit[ed] States is a glorious standard it is founded [in] the wisdom of God it is a heavenly banner it is to all those who are privileged with the sweats of its liberty like the cooling shades and refreshing watters of a greate rock in a thirsty and a weary land it is like a greate tree under whose branches men from every clime can be shielded from the burning rates of an inclement sun. We bretheren are deprived of the protection of this glorious principal by the cruelty of the cruele by those who only look for the time being for pasterage like the beasts of the field only to fill themselves and forget that the mormons as well as the pr[e]sbitareans and those of every other class and discription have equal rights to partake of the fruit of the great tree of our national liberty but notwithstanding we see what we see and we feel what [we] feel and know what we know yet that fruit is no les precious and delicious to our taist we cannot be weaned from the milk nether can we be drawn from the breast neither will we deny our relegeon because of the hand of oppresion but we will hold on untill death we say that God is true that the constitution of the United States is [true] that the Bible is true that the book of [mor]m[on] is true and [that we know] that we have an house not made [with hands] eternal in the heavens, whose [builder and m]aker is God. fn

 

Hence in one of the darkest moments of his life, the Prophet Joseph Smith wrote a letter that has lighted the way and has enlightened the lives of generations of individuals who, while they honor his name and cherish his memory, more fully worship their God and his Christ because of what he shared with them from a cold and forbidding jail cell in Missouri.

 

Notes A Ray of Light in an Hour of Darkness

 

1. HC 6:303-17.

 

2. Ibid., pp. 473-79.

 

3. Ibid., 3:1.

 

4. Dean C. Jessee, ed., The Personal Writing of Joseph Smith (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Company, 1984), pp. 360-430. Sources cited in this collection retain original spelling and punctuation. Built in 1833 at a cost of $600, the jail at Liberty, Missouri, was a two-story structure approximately twenty-two feet square built of rough-hewn limestone. Inside the outer wall was another wall of oak logs. The two walls were separated by a twelve-inch space filled with loose rock, the whole presenting a formidable barrier four feet thick. The interior of the jail was divided into upper and lower rooms, the lower, or dungeon, lighted by two small windows grated with heavy iron bars. It was here on 1 December 1838, that Joseph Smith began four months and five days of confinement.

 

5. "Joseph Smith to the Church in Caldwell County," 16 December 1838, as cited in Jessee, The Personal Writings of Joseph Smith, p. 379.

 

6. Ibid., pp. 380-81.

 

7. Ibid., p. 389. Also HC 3:272-74.

 

8. "Emma Smith to Joseph Smith," 7 March 1839, L.D.S. Church Archives. As cited in Jessee, The Personal Writings of Joseph Smith, pp. 388-89.

 

9. "Joseph Smith to Emma Smith," 21 March 1839, L.D.S. Church Archives. As cited in Jessee, The Personal Writings of Joseph Smith, pp. 408-9.

 

10. "Joseph Smith to the Church of Latter-day Saints at Quincy, Illinois and scatter abroad and to Bishop Partridge in particular." 20 March 1839, ibid., p. 391. This letter is in the handwriting of Caleb Baldwin and Alexander McRae.

 

11. Ibid., pp. 393-94.

 

12. HC 3:295.

 

13. Ibid., p. 296.

 

14. Ibid., p. 297.

 

15. Jessee, The Personal Writings of Joseph Smith, pp. 398-99.

 

16. Ibid., p. 401.

 

17. Ibid.

 

18. Ibid., p. 403-4.

 

19. Ibid., p. 405. Samson Avard was founder of the variously named Danite Band in Missouri. Using secrecy, oaths, and binding covenants, its members acted briefly as a group bent on resisting and, if necessary, destroying the enemies of the Church.

 

20. Ibid., pp. 406-7.

 

 

(Robert L. Millet and Kent P. Jackson, eds., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 1: The Doctrine and Covenants [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1989], 463.)

 

 

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 121:25-29.)

 

25 For there is a time appointed for every man, according as his works shall be.

 

26 God shall give unto you knowledge by his Holy Spirit, yea, by the unspeakable gift of the Holy Ghost, that has not been revealed since the world was until now;

 

27 Which our forefathers have awaited with anxious expectation to be revealed in the last times, which their minds were pointed to by the angels, as held in reserve for the fulness of their glory;

 

28 A time to come in the which nothing shall be withheld, whether there be one God or many gods, they shall be manifest.

 

29 All thrones and dominions, principalities and powers, shall be revealed and set forth upon all who have endured valiantly for the gospel of Jesus Christ.

 

 

If we endure valiantly we receive a great reward, but as verse 37 shows, we are not chosen because our hearts are set on the things of the world.

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 121:41-44.)

 

41 No power or influence can or ought to be maintained by virtue of the priesthood, only by persuasion, by long-suffering, by gentleness and meekness, and by love unfeigned;

 

42 By kindness, and pure knowledge, which shall greatly enlarge the soul without hypocrisy, and without guile—

 

43 Reproving betimes with sharpness, when moved upon by the Holy Ghost; and then showing forth afterwards an increase of love toward him whom thou hast reproved, lest he esteem thee to be his enemy;

 

44 That he may know that thy faithfulness is stronger than the cords of death.

 

 

Not only priesthood but parenthood is our calling in mortality, and qualifies us for what we should have.  Reprove with sharpness means to be calm but have precision and clarity.

 

Liberty jail was a place for Joseph to receive numerous revelations that would be needed for Nauvoo.

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 101:16.)

 

16 Therefore, let your hearts be comforted concerning Zion; for all flesh is in mine hands; be still and know that I am God.

 

 

We can’t know God in hurried lives.

 

 

Meditation in the Temple

 

Consider these interesting verses from the New Testament:

 

After this I beheld, and, lo, a great multitude, which no man could number, of all nations, and kindreds, and people, and tongues, stood before the throne, and before the Lamb, clothed with white robes, and palms in their hands;

 

And cried with a loud voice, saying, Salvation to our God which sitteth upon the throne, and unto the Lamb.

 

And one of the elders answered, saying unto me, What are these which are arrayed in white robes? And whence came they?

 

And I said unto him, Sir, thou knowest. And he said to me, These are they which came out of great tribulation, and have washed their robes, and made them white in the blood of the Lamb. (Revelation 7:9-10, 13-14.)

 

The Lord said in the Old Testament, and again to the Prophet Joseph Smith (Psalm 46:10 and D&C 101:16), “Be still, and know that I am God.” There is such a thing as learning to listen spiritually. There is such a thing as having pure intelligence poured into the mind. In the temple the meditation and contemplation that comes from a quietly observed reverence frequently results in such a pouring-in of intelligence and spiritual learning. And no small part of the atmosphere that makes this possible is the temple clothing and the spirit in which the wearer views it.

 

It may seem to some to be a very bold doctrine that we talk of—a power which records or binds on earth and binds in heaven. Nevertheless, in all ages of the world, whenever the Lord has given a dispensation of the priesthood to any man by actual revelation, or any set of men, this power has always been given. (D&C 128:9.)

 

 

(Boyd K. Packer, The Holy Temple [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1980], 79.)

 

 

 

When Elder Hinckley was called to the First Presidency, all three of its members had serious physical problems, although their mentality was unimpaired: President Kimball, in addition to long-standing heart, throat, and other problems, had undergone two recent operations for subdural hematomas; President Tanner suffered from Parkinson’s disease and was losing his sight; and President Romney was quite feeble and practically blind. Thus the responsibility to carry on the day-to-day work of the First Presidency fell largely on President Hinckley, acting under delegations of authority from the prophet. That responsibility increased markedly when President Tanner died on November 27, 1982, and President Hinckley became chairman of the Budget Committee, the Personnel Committee, and the Investment Committee. These added responsibilities had a crushing effect at first, causing weariness and a sense of oppression at the ever-mounting problems. The crisis came to a head in February 1983, when one morning, upon entering his office and seeing the large volume of paperwork on his desk, President Hinckley fell to his knees and implored God for strength and direction. In answer there came into his mind the words “Be still and know that I am God” (Doctrine and Covenants 101:16), and with that came a calm assurance that the problems would be solved in time and one at a time.

 

During the years President Hinckley served as a counselor to President Spencer W. Kimball, he walked a fine line. He was careful not to exceed the limits of his delegated authority. Yet he was unwilling to allow the Church to drift or stagnate. As a result, several major initiatives were undertaken that originated with him but were endorsed and authorized by President Kimball.

 

 

(Francis M. Gibbons, Dynamic Disciples, Prophets of God: Life Stories of the Presidents of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1996], 334 – 335.)

 

 

John H. Groberg, In the Eye of the Storm, p.114

 

I reflected on the scripture, “Be still and know that I am God” (D&C 101:16; Psalm 46:10). I had always thought of that scripture as a statement to watch for His salvation after we had done all we could. Now I looked upon it more as a commandment, or better, an invitation and explanation of truth: “Be still (sit quietly, get rid of outside pressures-go to the temple, for example-don’t worry about this world) and know that I am God.” Or: “Be still so you can know that I am God and so you can learn of Me and My ways.” If we aren’t willing to be still, it’s harder to know that He is God. If the purpose of life is to know and love God, then maybe one of Satan’s best weapons to keep us from that knowledge is to keep us so busy, even doing good things, and so occupied with commitments and pressures that we don’t allow ourselves to be still so we can know that God is God!   

 

 Andrew Skinner, Golgotha

 

Even Pilate was “surprised at the submissive yet majestic demeanor of Jesus” (Talmage, Jesus the Christ, 633). Modern disciples also marvel at Jesus’ meekness. He took what was dished out. He exercised poise in the face of provocation. He suffered silently, knowing, as many in our day know, that sometimes silence can be the only response to trials, tribulations, and hardships. Others will not, cannot, understand. Some will not care. A few might even be inclined to think we had brought on the misery ourselves. But there is One with whom we have fellowship, One who knows silent suffering, One who hurts when we hurt, because he experienced the hurt before we did. Perhaps, it is in these moments of silent suffering and submissive meekness that we come to know God best, the time when He tutors us the most. After all, did not he who knows all things make the link between silence and the knowledge of his existence and power-in two separate dispensations, in fact? “Be still, and know that I am God,” he declared (Psalm 46:10; D&C 101:16). If we try as hard as we can to endure our trials well, reviling not when we are reviled, assailing not when we are assailed, rendering not evil for evil or railing for railing, suffering silently without murmuring, whining, or feeling sorry for ourselves, then God will exalt us on high (1 Peter 2:23; 3:9; D&C 121:8).

 

 

 D&C 124 – Members of the 12 head to England

 

Revelations in Nauvoo

(D&C 124-126)

 

ROBERT A. CLOWARD

 

The three sections labeled revelations from the Nauvoo period all came in 1841. By the summer of that year, the little town of Commerce, Illinois, laid out by land speculators on a horseshoe bend of the Mississippi River, had witnessed an influx of between 8,000 and 9,000 Latter-day Saints. fn They were of mixed origin, the largest number composed of exiles fleeing the Extermination Order of Governor Lilburn W. Boggs of Missouri, to which were added many converts from the eastern United States, Canada, and the British Isles. Some had already left behind a string of homes. Undoubtedly they were dismayed at the extent to which the Lord required the trial of their faith. But the determination and perseverance of these Saints demonstrated their convictions.

 

After escaping from oppressive captors during a change of venue from Daviess County to Boone County, Missouri in April of 1839, Joseph Smith had chosen Commerce as the new gathering place. fn To some the location seemed quite undesirable, and many of the Saints suffered from malarial fever carried by mosquitoes which bred in the swampy land. Joseph Smith commented, "Commerce was so unhealthful, very few could live there; but believing that it might become a healthful place by the blessing of heaven to the Saints, and no more eligible place presenting itself, I considered it wisdom to make an attempt to build up a city." fn

 

On 29 October 1839, the Prophet left Commerce with Sidney Rigdon and Judge Elias Higbee to seek redress from the Federal Government for the wrongs committed against the members of the Church in Missouri. Their appeal was reluctantly received by the President of the United States, Martin Van Buren, who remarked to Joseph and Judge Higbee, "Gentlemen, your cause is just, but I can do nothing for you." fn

 

The Saints, however, were doing something for themselves. Their industry and determination were making of Commerce, renamed Nauvoo by the Prophet, a prosperous city, soon to be the largest in Illinois. Swamps were drained, land cleared, and wide streets laid out at right angles. Comfortable homes were constructed of stone and brick, and Joseph Smith wrote to the Saints abroad in January, 1841: "The name of our city (Nauvoo) is of Hebrew origin, and signifies a beautiful situation, or place, carrying with it, also, the idea of rest; and is truly descriptive of the most delightful location." fn

 

This scene of vigorous activity was the backdrop for the revelations known as sections 124, 125, and 126. They contain the Lord's instructions on a wide variety of topics of concern to the Prophet and to the Church. Section 124, received 19 January 1841, is the longest of all the published revelations. Before discussing it, I will briefly comment on sections 125 and 126, which contain just four and three verses respectively.

 

A Revelation for the Saints in Iowa

 

Shortly after the purchase of Illinois land in 1839, the Church had purchased large tracts on the opposite side of the Mississippi River in the Territory of Iowa. fn At the general conference held in October of that year, John Smith was appointed president over the Iowa Saints. fn However, the increasing emphasis on Nauvoo as a gathering place naturally caused many to wonder whether they should leave their settlements and join the Saints at Nauvoo. In direct answer to this question, the Lord revealed in March 1841: "Let them gather themselves together unto the places which I shall appoint unto them by my servant Joseph, and build up cities unto my name" (D&C 125:2, italics added). Nauvoo was to be the cornerstone of Zion (D&C 124:2), but the Lord intended that other stakes be strengthened, including the one in lowa.

 

In August, 1841, a stake conference was held at Zarahemla, "and the branches in Iowa, so far as represented, consisted of 750 members." fn By the time of the exodus in 1846, the Saints had exerted a major influence on the growth of the territory, and cities had been developed at Montrose, Zarahemla, Ambrosia, Augusta, Nashville, and Keokuk.

 

A Revelation for Brigham Young

 

Section 126 was received by the Prophet in the house of Brigham Young at Nauvoo. fn With the other members of the Quorum of the Twelve, Brigham Young had been called by revelation in 1838 to preach the gospel in England (see D&C 118). Illness and persecution did not prevent their responding to this commandment, and in scarcely more than a year of missionary work, they converted literally thousands to the Church. fn

 

On 1 July 1841, President Young, with Heber C. Kimball end John Taylor, returned to Nauvoo from their labors. The revelation, given a little over a week later on 9 July, began with the Lord's tender address, "Dear and well-beloved brother, Brigham Young" (D&C 126:1). "My servant Brigham," the Lord continued, "it is no more required at your hand to leave your family as in times past, for your offering is acceptable to me" (D&C 126:1). As President of the Quorum of the Twelve, Brigham Young was directed to remain in Nauvoo and to "send" the Lord's word abroad (D&C 126:3).

 

The significance of the command to remain at Nauvoo became clear in the general conference of the following month. Prior to this time, the Twelve had served mainly as a traveling council. At the afternoon conference session of 16 August 1841, Joseph Smith announced "that the time had come when the Twelve should be called upon to stand in their place next to the First Presidency, and attend to the settling of emigrants and the business of the Church at the stakes, and assist to bear off the kingdom victoriously to the nations, and as they had been faithful, and had borne the burden in the heat of the day, that it was right that they should have an opportunity of providing something for themselves and families." fn By setting them "in their place next to the First Presidency," the Prophet was preparing the way for the Twelve, with Brigham Young as President to preside over the Church at the time of his death.

 

Make a Solemn Proclamation

 

In his preface to the Doctrine and Covenants, the Lord announced in 1831 that the weak and simple would proclaim the fulness of the gospel "unto the ends of the world, and before kings and rulers" (D&C 1:23). Ten years later, he commanded that such a proclamation be made in writing. The time had come to call upon rulers and governments to give heed to the light and glory of Zion (D&C 124:6).

 

The fact that the Lord had given a commandment by no means guaranteed the facilitation of its fulfillment. Robert B. Thompson, named to help Joseph Smith with the writing (D&C 124:12), died before the end of the year, fn and John C. Bennett, named to assist in the promulgation of the proclamation (D&C 124:16), fell into apostasy. fn The completion of the project continued to concern the Prophet until the time of his death. fn

 

A year after the martyrdom, Parley P. Pratt composed a document under the direction of the Twelve Apostles entitled, "PROCLAMATION of the Twelve Apostles of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. To all the Kings of the World; To the President of the United States of America; To the Governors of the several States; And to the Rulers and People of all Nations." It was published in New York on 6 April 1845. The spirit of this proclamation is manifest in its opening line: "KNOW YE:—That the kingdom of God has come: as has been predicted by ancient prophets, and prayed for in all ages; even that kingdom which shall fill the whole earth, and shall stand for ever." fn The command was issued to leaders of nations and kingdoms to repent, be baptized for the remission of sins and contribute to the establishment of the kingdom of God.

 

The Lord's command to make a solemn proclamation has had a continuing fulfillment. The bold missionary thrust of the Church for more than one and one-half century, spreading the message of the restored gospel throughout the world, is a response to the Lord's instruction. At the One Hundred Fiftieth Annual General Conference, commemorating the Sesquicentennial anniversary of the organization of the Church, Elder Gordon B. Hinckley read a new proclamation, entitled, "Proclamation From the First Presidency and the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints." Broadcast from the reconstructed Peter Whitmer, Sr. farmhouse at the site of the organization of the Church, this bold statement recounted the events of the restoration and witnessed to the divine destiny of the Church, inviting all to heed the message of the missionaries and accept the truth. It concluded:

 

We call upon all men and women to forsake evil and turn to God; to work together to build that brotherhood which must be recognized when we truly come to know that God is our Father and we are his children; and to worship him and his Son, the Lord Jesus Christ, the Savior of mankind. In the authority of the Holy Priesthood in us vested, we bless the seekers of truth wherever they may be and invoke the favor of the Almighty upon all men and nations whose God is the Lord, in the name of Jesus Christ, amen. fn

 

Many Are Called, But Few Are Chosen

 

Throughout section 124, the Lord revealed his will and counsel to individuals at Nauvoo. Even a brief consideration of the blessings offered these men and their subsequent lives provides a lesson on the contingent nature of the Lord's promises. "When we obtain any blessing from God, it is by obedience to that law upon which it is predicated" (D&C 130:21). Many of these men were commended by the Lord and received great promises, but they subsequently forfeited them through sin and apostasy. fn

 

For example, John C. Bennett was assigned by the Lord to stand by Joseph Smith in the hour of affliction, "and his reward shall not fail if he receive counsel. And for his love he shall be great, for he shall be mine if he do this, saith the Lord. I have seen the work which he hath done, which I accept if he continue, and will crown him with blessings and great glory" (D&C 124:16-17). Bennett's apostasy has already been mentioned above. The two "if" statements defined the contingent nature of the Lord's promises to him: "if he receive counsel" and "if he continue." He did neither, and his blessing was lost.

 

Similarly, the Lord extended to Lyman Wight a beautiful blessing: "And I will bear him up as on eagles' wings; and he shall beget glory and honor to himself and unto my name. That when he shall finish his work I may receive him unto myself" (D&C 124:18-19). Faithful for a time, and even called to the Apostleship, Lyman Wight later rejected the leadership of the Twelve and published a pamphlet in 1848 denying their authority. He was excommunicated from the Church. Likewise, George Miller, Isaac Galland, William Law, Robert D. Foster, and Sidney Rigdon did not endure in their faith.

 

Of those who remained true to the church, mention may be made of Vinson Knight and Hyrum Smith. To Vinson Knight the Lord said, "and I will accept of his offerings, for they shall not be unto me as the offerings of Cain, for he shall be mine, saith the Lord. Let his family rejoice and turn away their hearts from affliction; for I have chosen him and anointed him, and he shall be honored in the midst of his house, for I will forgive all his sins, saith the Lord" (D&C 124:74-76). And to Hyrum Smith, "blessed is my servant Hyrum Smith; for I, the Lord, love him because of the integrity of his heart, and because he loveth that which is right before me, saith the Lord" (D&C 124:15). Both of these men later met death in Illinois, faithful to their callings and hopeful of the fulfillment of their profferred blessings.

 

Priesthood Organization

 

Verses 123-45 of section 124 list the officers of the Church. Deaths, apostasy, and other developments had made some reorganization necessary. Of great significance among these changes was the call of Hyrum Smith to serve as patriarch in the place of his deceased father, Joseph Smith, Sr. (v. 124). fn The First Presidency, as revealed earlier in this revelation, was to consist of Joseph Smith, Jr., Sidney Rigdon, and William Law, with William Law filling the vacancy left by the calling of Hyrum Smith to be patriarch. Brigham Young was named president over the Twelve, and the vacancy in that quorum brought about by the death of David Patten at the Battle of Crooked River in 1838 remained open for the time being.

 

It is significant to note that the language of the Lord in this revelation concerning callings was: "I give unto you [name] to be [calling]." In all cases, two principles were upheld by the Lord: (1) the agency of the person called (note the phrase "if he will receive it" in the naming of Shadrach Roundy for the bishopric), and (2) the law of common consent (note v. 144: "And a commandment I give unto you, that you should fill all these offices and approve of those names which I have mentioned, or else disapprove of them at my general conference").

 

The Lord's Boarding House

 

Much of section 124 deals with the building of a boarding house in Nauvoo (vv. 22-24, 56-83, 111-22). To some it may seem curious that the plans for a hotel, complete with trustees, investment policy, and a list of potential stockholders would be received by revelation from God, but the Nauvoo House was intended to play an important role in his work.

 

The revelation is clear as to the sacred nature of this hotel. The Lord commanded that it be built "unto his name" (vv. 22, 24, 56). He called it "my boarding house," and added, "let my name be named upon it" (v. 56). The governor of the house was not to allow it to be polluted: "It shall be holy, or the Lord your God will not dwell therein" (v. 24). fn This is an excellent example of the principle revealed in D&C 29:34: "Wherefore, verily I say unto you that all things unto me are spiritual." In an earlier dispensation, Zechariah had prophesied of sacred things in another holy city: "In that day shall there be upon the bells of the horses, HOLINESS UNTO THE LORD; and the pots in the Lord's house shall be like the bowls before the altar. Yea, every pot in Jerusalem and in Judah shall be holiness unto the Lord of hosts" (Zech. 14:20-21).

 

The building of a hotel must be associated with the command given to Joseph Smith to make a proclamation to kings and governors. The Lord indicated that the hearts of many of them would be softened, and his challenge to them was stirring: "Awake, O kings of the earth! Come ye, O. come ye, with your gold and your silver, to the help of my people, to the house of the daughters of Zion" (D&C 124:11). A place had to be provided to receive such visitors: "And let it be a delightful habitation for man, and a resting-place for the weary traveler, that he may contemplate the glory of Zion, and the glory of this, the cornerstone thereof" (D&C 124:60).

 

The Nauvoo House was also intended as a residence for Joseph Smith and his descendants (the right of stockholders would be passed to their heirs), and as a place where people who came to the city could receive counsel from those whom the Lord had designated as "plants of renown" (see Ezek. 34:29; cf. Isa. 60:21; 61:3) and as "watchmen upon her walls" (see Isa. 62:6). All this was part of the far-ranging plan for the gathering place of the Church.

 

Joseph Smith continually urged the Saints to complete the construction of the Nauvoo House. He, more than many, envisioned the significance of the project. Typical of his exhortations on the matter is the reference in a sermon given at the General Conference meeting of 6 April 1843: "It is not right that all the burden of the Nauvoo House should rest on a few individuals; and we will now consider the propriety of sending the Twelve to collect means for it. There has been too great a solicitude in individuals for the building of the Temple to the exclusion of the Nauvoo House." fn Ultimately, the press of increased persecutions and the desire to complete the Temple prevailed, and on 4 March 1844 the completion of the Nauvoo House was postponed. fn The building was never completed, and the property and partially constructed walls remained in the hands of Emma Smith with the settlement of the Prophet's estate.

 

Two principles of the Lord's work may be learned from the Nauvoo House revelation. First, there is a permanence of perspective in the Lord's work. He knew, of course, that the Saints would soon be driven from Nauvoo, yet he required of them undertakings which looked forward "from generation to generation." His kingdom is not a temporary one. Second, to establish his kingdom, the Lord requires temples, but he also requires hotels. Spiritual principles and ordinances are complemented by temporal affairs in his work.

 

The Nauvoo Temple

 

Beginning with Moroni's quotation from Mal. 4 in 1823 (JS-H 37-39), The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has increasingly focused on the importance of temples. Our great mission in mortality is to discover the way to eternal life and to walk in that way: "And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent" John 17:3). A temple is the House of the Lord—a place where his mortal children go to make contact with him and a place where he may reveal himself to them. In addition, it is a place where sacred priesthood ordinances are performed. fn

 

The first command to build a temple had come to the Prophet Joseph Smith in July 1831 (D&C 57:1-3). This was to be the temple in the center place of Zion in Jackson County, Missouri. The site for this temple was dedicated on 3 August 1831, but before the construction began, mobs had expelled the Saints from the county. Just two months after the first mob gathered, the Prophet was commanded to tarry in Kirtland, Ohio and build a temple there (D&C 95:8-9). fn The Lord had promised the Prophet that in Ohio he would "be endowed with power from on high" (see D&C 38:32), and it was in the Kirtland Temple that the restoration of the sacred keys occurred as described in D&C 110.

 

The Kirtland Temple was not intended as a place for the performance of endowment ceremonies for the general Church membership or for ordinances for the dead. Speaking of the Kirtland Temple, Brigham Young said, "And those first Elders who helped to build it, received a portion of their first endowments, or we might say more clearly, some of the first, or introductory, or initiatory ordinances, preparatory to an endowment. The preparatory ordinances there administered, though accompanied by the ministrations of angels, and the presence of the Lord Jesus, were but a faint similitude of the ordinances of the house of the Lord in their fulness." fn

 

Section 124 contains instructions on the building of the temple in Nauvoo (vv. 25-48, 55). The Lord promised Joseph Smith: "And verily I say unto you, let this house be built unto my name, that I may reveal mine ordinances therein unto my people; For I deign to reveal unto my church . . . things that pertain to the dispensation of the fulness of times. And I will show unto my servant Joseph all things pertaining to this house, and the priesthood thereof, and the place whereon it shall be built" (D&C 124:40-42).

 

Perhaps sensing that he would not live to see the Nauvoo Temple completed, fn Joseph Smith began on 4 May 1842 to administer the ordinances revealed to him in fulfillment of the Lord's promise. He spent that day with several church leaders in the upper part of his red brick store "instructing them in the principles and order of the Priesthood, attending to washings, anointings, endowments and the communication of keys pertaining to the Aaronic Priesthood, and so on to the highest order of the Melchisedek Priesthood, setting forth the order pertaining to the Ancient of Days, and all those plans and principles by which any one is enabled to secure the fullness of those blessings which have been prepared for the Church of the First Born, and come up and abide in the presence of the Eloheim in the eternal worlds." fn He wrote of the occasion that it was the first time this order was instituted in the latter days and that the things received by a few that day would be made available to all the Saints of the last days when they were prepared to receive them and when a proper place was prepared for them to be communicated. fn

 

The construction of the Nauvoo Temple required a prodigious effort. Even before section 124 was received, the First Presidency had sent an address to the Saints abroad declaring that the time had come to gather to Nauvoo and to make the sacrifices necessary to build a house for the ordinances of God. fn This request was heightened by the word of the Lord: "Send ye swift messengers" (D&C 124:26) and "Let all my saints come from afar" (D&C 124:25). In 1843, the Prophet taught the meaning of the principle of gathering as follows: "What was the object of gathering the Jews, or the people of God in any age of the world? . . . The main object was to build unto the Lord a house whereby He could reveal unto His people the ordinances of His house and the glories of His kingdom, and teach the people the way of salvation; for there are certain ordinances and principles that, when they are taught and practiced, must be done in a place or house built for that purpose." fn The Lord intended to gather a chosen people at Nauvoo and make them a covenant people through the ordinances of the temple.

 

In section 124, the Lord taught a principle by which the Saints could know if their work was acceptable to him. "Verily, verily, I say unto you, that when I give a commandment to any of the sons of men to do a work unto my name, and those sons of men go with all their might and with all they have to perform that work, and cease not their diligence, and their enemies come upon them and hinder them from performing that work, behold, it behooveth me to require that work no more at the hands of those sons of men, but to accept of their offerings" (v. 49). On this basis, the Lord said that he had accepted the offerings of the faithful people whom he had first commanded to build the temple at Jackson County, Missouri. They could be consoled that the Lord would not hold them responsible for failing to build the temple there in the midst of their persecutions.

 

Enemies of the Church were determined to halt or prevent the work on the Nauvoo Temple as well. After a brief lull following the martyrdom of Joseph and Hyrum Smith, pressure intensified upon the Saints to leave Nauvoo. This pressure "propelled Brigham Young toward two main objectives: first, to complete the temple and other unfinished projects in Nauvoo; and second, to find and prepare to depart for a new place of settlement." fn President Young was anxious to see the people spiritually strengthened by the temple ordinances, and despite preparations to leave the city, the Saints redoubled their work on the temple. On 10 December 1845, the first endowment work was begun in the attic story, and during the next eight weeks before the temple closed on 8 February 1846, nearly 5,600 members received their endowments. fn

 

Before leaving Nauvoo, Brigham Young and the Twelve Apostles met in the still uncompleted structure. Brigham Young wrote of that occasion: "I met with the Council of the Twelve in the southeast corner room of the attic of the Temple. We knelt around the altar, and dedicated the building to the Most High. We asked his blessing upon our intended move to the west; also asked him to enable us some day to finish the Temple, and dedicate it to him, and we would leave it in his hands to do as he pleased; and to preserve the building as a momument to Joseph Smith. We asked the Lord to accept the labors of his servants in this land. We then left the Temple." fn

 

A special crew of workers remained behind in Nauvoo to complete the construction. Orson Hyde, representing the Twelve, was to oversee this work. By mid-April 1846, public dedications were announced for the first three days of May. On 30 April, the day before the public dedications began, a private dedication was held, which Wilford Woodruff described in his journal as follows: "In the evening of this day I repaired to the Temple with Elder Orson Hyde and about twenty other elders of Israel. There we were all clothed in our priestly robes and dedicated the Temple of the Lord, erected to His most holy name by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Notwithstanding the predictions of false prophets and the threat of mobs that the building should never be completed nor dedicated, their words had fallen to the ground. The Temple was now finished and dedicated to Him. After the dedication, we raised our voices in a united shout of 'Hosanna to God and the Lamb!"' fn

 

Their offering was acceptable to God, and the workmen joined the remainder of the Saints in Iowa. The temple was left behind, but it had fulfilled its purpose. Erastus Snow later commented: "The Spirit, Power, and Wisdom of God reigned continually in the Temple, and all felt satisfied that during the two months we occupied it in the endowment of the Saints, we were amply paid for all our labors in building it." fn Brigham Young, in a spirit of rejoicing during the period the endowments were being performed, said: "This church has obtained already all they have labored for in building this Temple, but after we leave here (I feel it in my bones) there will be thousands of men that can go into any part of the world and build up the kingdom, and build temples." fn

 

Considering the Nauvoo Temple in retrospect, a modern apostle has observed: "Those who look back on Church history sometimes grind their teeth at the injustice of the persecutions or weep over the loss of temples. They were taken from us. But those who took the temples and defiled them have nothing, comparatively, and we have everything. They have a building or a site or two; we have the keys, we have the ordinances, we have the authority." fn

 

Notes Revelations in Nauvoo

 

1. B. H. Roberts, A Comprehensive History of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter day Saints. 6 vols. (Salt Lake City: Deseret News Press, 1930), 2:84-85.

 

2. HC 3:319-21. Of this escape from their intoxicated guard, Hyrum Smith poignantly said, "we took our change of venue for the state of Illinois." (HC 3:423.)

 

3. Ibid., 3:375.

 

4. Ibid., 4:80.

 

5. Ibid., 4:268.

 

6. HC 3:378. See also Lyndon W. Cook, "Isaac Galland—Mormon Benefactor," Brigham Young University Studies 19.3 (Spring 1979): 268-84.

 

7. HC 4:12.

 

8. Ibid., p. 399.

 

9. Ibid., p. 382.

 

10. See James B. Allen and Malcolm R. Thorp, "The Mission of the Twelve to England, 184041: Mormon Apostles and the Working Class," Brigham Young University Studies 15.4 (Summer 1975): 499-526. See also David A. Boone, "A Time for Commitment," found herein.

 

11. HC 4:403.

 

12. Ibid., p. 411.

 

13. Ibid., 5:71-82.

 

14. Ibid., 4:483-84; 6:79-80, 176-77.

 

15. James R. Clark, comp., Messages of the First Presidency, 6 vols. (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1965-75), 1:252-53.

 

16. Conference Report, April 1980, p. 77; Ensign, May 1980, p. 53.

 

17. For helpfuls biographical information on each man named in section 124, see Lyndon W. Cook, The Revelations of the Prophet Joseph Smith (Provo: Seventy's Mission Bookstore, 1981), pp. 251-81.

 

18. Note that in v. 95 Hyrum Smith was also to be "crowned with the same blessing, and glory, and honor, and priesthood, and gifts of the priesthood that once were put upon him that was my servant Oliver Cowdery." Oliver Cowdery had been excommunicated for apostasy 12 April 1838 at Far West, Missouri. See HC 3:17.

 

19. Compare the similar injunction for temples in D&C 97:15-17.

 

20. HC 5:329.

 

21. Ibid., 6:230.

 

22. See approaches to the definition of "temple" in Richard O. Cowan, "Temple Building Ancient and Modern" (Provo: Brigham Young University Press, 1971); and James E. Talmage, The House of the Lord (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1968).

 

23. The revelation in D&C 95:8-9 was given on 1 June 1833. The mob in April (see HC 1:342). On 23 July 1833, the cornerstones of the Kirtland Temple were laid, the very day that another mob served notice of expulsion on the Missouri Saints (see HC 1:400).

 

24. JD 2:3 1.

 

25. In remarks to the Relief Society on 28 April 1842, Joseph Smith "spoke of delivering the keys of the Priesthood to the Church, and said that the faithful members of the Relief Society should receive them in connection with their husbands, that the Saints whose integrity has been tried and proved faithful, might know how to ask the Lord and receive an answer; for according to his prayers, God had appointed him elsewhere" HC 4:604 (italics added); see also TPJS, p. 226.

 

26. HC 5:2; TPJS, p. 237.

 

27. Ibid.

 

28. Ibid., 4:186, see also ibid., 4:205.

 

29. Ibid., 5:423.

 

30. Francis M. Gibbons, Brigham Young, Modern Moses, Prophet of God (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1981), p. 109.

 

31. Lyndon W. Cook, The Revelations, p. 250.

 

32. HC 7:580.

 

33. Matthias F. Cowley, Wilford Woodruff (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1964), p. 247.

 

34. Andrew K. Larsen, Erastus Snow (Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1971), p. 96, cited in Lisle G Brown, "The Sacred Departments for Temple Work in Nauvoo: The Assembly Room and the Council Chamber," Brigham Young University Studies 19.3 (Spring 1979): 361-74.

 

35. Quoted in Helen Mar Whitney, "Scenes in Nauvoo, and Incidents from H. C. Kimball's Journal" (entry for "Friday, January 2nd, 1846") Woman's Exponent 12.8 (15 September 1883): 58, cited in Don F. Colvin, "A Historical Study of the Mormon Temple at Nauvoo, Illinois," unpublished master's thesis, Brigham Young University, 1962, p. 160.

 

36. Boyd K. Packer, The Holy Temple (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1980), p. 176.

 

 

(Robert L. Millet and Kent P. Jackson, eds., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 1: The Doctrine and Covenants [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1989], 476.)

 

 

D&C 124:15 – Hyrum Smith is blessed because of the integrity of his heart.

 

D&C 124:22-24 – Build the Nauvoo Hotel

 

D&C 124:25 – Saints are to come to Nauvoo and build a temple to restore the fulness of the priesthood.

 

D&C 124:29-32 – Baptism for the Dead as a temple ordinance.  This links the family, given line upon line.

 

Directions to Build the Temple

 

On 19 January 1841, approximately one month after the governor of Illinois signed charters providing guidelines for establishing Nauvoo, Joseph Smith unfolded a revelation (D&C 124) of “monumental importance . . . because its fulfillment engaged nearly every waking moment of the Prophet’s time until his death” [Cook, Revelations, p. 243). This revelation dealt with the building of Nauvoo in general but gave particular emphasis to the construction of the temple.

 

The Prophet testified that the basic design for the Nauvoo Temple had been given to him by revelation. For example, when architect William Weeks questioned placing round windows on the side of the building, Joseph explained that “one light at the centre of each circular window would be sufficient to light the whole room; that when the whole building was thus illuminated, the effect would be remarkably grand. ‘I wish you to carry out my designs,”’ the Prophet insisted. “’I have seen in vision the splendid appearance of that building illuminated, and will have it built according to the pattern shown me”’ (History of the Church, 6:196-97). This was one fulfillment of the Lord’s promise to show the Prophet “all things pertaining to that house” (D&C 124:42).

 

The January 1841 revelation declared that the ordinance of baptism for the dead should be performed in the Lord’s house and that he had temporarily allowed the Saints to perform this ordinance outside the temple (such as in the Mississippi River) only in the days of their poverty. He therefore commanded them to provide an appropriate font in the temple. He would grant them “a sufficient time” to accomplish that, curing which period he would continue to accept the baptisms performed in the river (D&C 124:32D&C 124:25-32).

 

The Saints took this revelation seriously, so they hastened the construction of the temple. On 2 October 1841 the Prophet emphatically declared: “There shall be no more baptisms for the dead, until the ordinance can be attended to in the Lord’s house; and the Church shall not hold another general Conference, until they can meet in said house. For thus saith the Lord!” (History of the Church, 4:426). Soon, the temple basement was covered over, and on November 8, Joseph Smith dedicated a temporary wooden font there. On Sunday, November 21, a large congregation gathered in the temple basement to witness the first baptisms for the dead in this new font. Elders Brigham Young, Heber C. Kimball, and John Taylor baptized about forty persons in behalf of their ancestors. Elders Willard Richards, Wilford Woodruff, and George A. Smith performed the confirmation ordinances. Thereafter, the Prophet and members of the Twelve frequently officiated in the temple (History of the Church, 4:446-47, 454, and 486).

 

 

(Milton V. Backman, Jr. and Richard O. Cowan, Joseph Smith and the Doctrine and Covenants [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1992], 129.)

 

 

 

 

 

Old Testament – Book of Moses

 

 

 

Between the burning bush and Moses going back on his mission to Egypt, Moses 1:1 occurs.  He needs power from on high to fulfill his calling.  Some time elapses between Moses call and the trip to Egypt.

 

Exodus 3 – The Lord appears to Moses at a burning bush, His father in law Jethro is a high priest from Abraham’s line.

 

 

LINE OF ORDINATION OF MOSES

 

In the 84th section, the order of descent of the Priesthood is continued, and these facts are learned:

 

Moses received the Priesthood from Jethro, his father-in-law. It will be observed that Jethro was not an Israelite, but a Midianite, yet he held the Priesthood. The Bible does not tell us much in regard to the Midianites or other nations as pertaining to Priesthood and their standing before the Lord. Jethro, who was a descendant of Abraham, evidently was entitled to the Priesthood and so, we may believe, were others among his people. Jethro received the Priesthood from Caleb, and Caleb received the Priesthood from Elihu, and Elihu under the hand of Jeremy, and Jeremy under the hand of Gad who received it from Esaias who lived in the days of Abraham. From this information it would appear that Moses received his Priesthood outside of the tribes of Israel and through a lineage outside of the descendants of Jacob. We are not given to understand to what nation or nations Caleb, Elihu, Jeremy and Gad belonged, but some of them, at least, we may presume were descendants of Abraham and of Midian. “Esaias also lived in the days of Abraham, and was blessed of him.” Abraham received his Priesthood from Melchizerak and was blessed by Melchizedek, the king of Salem, the great high priest.

 

 

(Joseph Fielding Smith, The Way to Perfection [Salt Lake City: Genealogical Society of Utah, 1949], 76.)

 

LORD = Jehovah

Lord = Hebrew word for lord

lord = Man or false deity

 

 

KJV:  God = Elohim (Hebrew a generic term for God, god or gods)

 

The Old Testament is not clear about the various titles for God or Christ; there is an intermixing between them.  There wasn’t much distinction between the Father and the Son.  Even in appearance they were identical.  Joseph couldn’t tell the difference until the Father introduced the Son.

 

(Deuteronomy 10:12, 17.)

 

12 ¶ And now, Israel, what doth the LORD thy God require of thee, but to fear the LORD thy God, to walk in all his ways, and to love him, and to serve the LORD thy God with all thy heart and with all thy soul,

 

 

17 For the LORD your God is God of gods, and Lord of lords, a great God, a mighty, and a terrible, which regardeth not persons, nor taketh reward:

 

 

 

Jesus Christ, the Son of God, is “the express image” of His Father’s person (Hebrews 1:3). He walked the earth as a human being, as a perfect man, and said, in answer to a question put to Him: “He that hath seen me hath seen the Father” (John 14:9). This alone ought to solve the problem to the satisfaction of every thoughtful, reverent mind. The conclusion is irresistible, that if the Son of God be the express image (that is, likeness) of His Father’s person, then His Father is in the form of man; for that was the form of the Son of God, not only during His mortal life, but before His mortal birth, and after His resurrection. It was in this form that the Father and the Son, as two personages, appeared to Joseph Smith, when, as a boy of fourteen years, he received his first vision. Then if God made man—the first man—in His own image and likeness, he must have made him like unto Christ, and consequently like unto men of Christ’s time and of the present day. That man was made in the image of Christ, is positively stated in the Book of Moses: “And I, God, said unto mine Only Begotten, which was with me from the beginning, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness; and it was so. * * * And I, God, created man in mine own image, in the image of mine Only Begotten created I him, male and female created I them” (2:26, 27).

 

(James R. Clark, comp., Messages of the First Presidency of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 6 vols. (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1965-75), 4: 202.)

 

 

Moses goes up to Egypt where the culture had numerous gods that they worshipped.

 

(Exodus 3:7.)

 

7 ¶ And the LORD said, I have surely seen the affliction of my people which are in Egypt, and have heard their cry by reason of their taskmasters; for I know their sorrows;

 

God is aware of His people; He knows their sorrows and hears their cries.

 

(Matthew 6:7-8.)

 

7 But when ye pray, use not vain repetitions, as the heathen do: for they think that they shall be heard for their much speaking.

 

8 Be not ye therefore like unto them: for your Father knoweth what things ye have need of, before ye ask him.

 

Many cultures performed rituals to supposedly catch the attention of their god.  Christ says that God already knows us and is interested in our welfare.  We don’t need vain repetitions to get His attention.  God knows what we need before we even ask, we pray with real intent, exercising faith.

 

(Exodus 3:11-13.)

 

11 ¶ And Moses said unto God, Who am I, that I should go unto Pharaoh, and that I should bring forth the children of Israel out of Egypt?

 

12 And he said, Certainly I will be with thee; and this shall be a token unto thee, that I have sent thee: When thou hast brought forth the people out of Egypt, ye shall serve God upon this mountain.

 

13 And Moses said unto God, Behold, when I come unto the children of Israel, and shall say unto them, The God of your fathers hath sent me unto you; and they shall say to me, What is his name? what shall I say unto them?

 

Moses doesn’t have enough faith for his calling at first.  He needed to be taught by God a few basic doctrines and principles of the gospel.

 

Moses Objections:

 

  1. Who am I?  I’m nobody.  You will not be alone, I will be with you.
  2. Who are you?  There is something important in a name, especially in Egypt.  God identifies Himself and give His name, verse 14.

 

When we change rank we are given a new name.  Names are keys to knowledge, even in the temple.

 

(Isaiah 56:5.)

 

5 Even unto them will I give in mine house and within my walls a place and a name better than of sons and of daughters: I will give them an everlasting name, that shall not be cut off.

 

 

Mine house/within my walls. Such terms refer to the temple (Matt. 21:12- 13).

 

A hand and a name better than of sons and of daughters/everlasting name. The Lord promises those who come into “mine house,” or his temple, a hand and a name. Hands and names are important parts of the temple covenants (D&C 88:119-21, 130-36; 130:11). The New English Bible may help clarify the meaning of this verse when it says,[“[they] shall receive from me something better than sons and daughters, . . . I will give them an everlasting name, a name imperishable for all time.” The name may be the new name given to those who are exalted (D&C 130:11), or it may be the name that King Benjamin gave to his people, which “never should be blotted out” (Mosiah 5:11)—that is, the name of Christ. Compare this usage of “everlasting name, that shall not be cut off” with the usage in 55:13.

 

 

(Donald W. Parry, Jay A. Parry, and Tina M. Peterson, Understanding Isaiah [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1998], 497.)

 

 

The Secret Names of God

 

The need for secrecy concerning the celestial ascent is in part because a key concept of the celestial mystery is the revelation of the most secret and sacred names of God and the angels. Fn Pronouncing the tetragrammaton Yod-He-Waw-He (often vocalized today as Yahweh or Jehovah) was restricted to the High Priest in the Holy of Holies in the earthly temple on Yom Kippur, the most sacred day of the Jewish year. Fn “The secret name, or names, of God played a great role in some of the ancient Jewish concepts of creation,” which “might be connected with certain speculations concerning the uttering of the tetragrammaton during the [earthly] temple service.” Fn Likewise, the rituals and mysteries of the celestial temple are closely associated with the knowledge of the tetragrammaton. Since the visionary often learned the secrets of the Holy Name, which could be pronounced only by the High Priest, the celestial ascent seems to imply an initiation into the highest Israelite priesthood.

 

The ritual use of names is widespread in the celestial ascent. When Abraham is called to ascend into heaven, God sends to him the angel Yahweh-el (Iaoel) “through the mediation of my [God’s] ineffable name.” fn Likewise, Rashi’s commentary on the famous ascent of the four Rabbis into paradise fn claims that “they ascended to heaven by means of a Name.” fn Those who misuse their knowledge of these sacred names receive eternal condemnation. Fn Thus, the sacred names of the angels and God are to be kept secret and only revealed to those who are worthy to ascend to the celestial temple. Fn

 

 

(Donald W. Parry, ed., Temples of the Ancient World: Ritual and Symbolism [Salt Lake City and Provo: Deseret Book Co., Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies, 1994], 455.)

 

 

(Exodus 3:14.)

 

14 And God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you.

 

 

Hebrew does not have verb tense, it has aspects of an action completed, finished, done (perfect) and actions ongoing, incomplete (imperfect).

 

 

I AM

 

The great I AM (see also Jesus Christ)

 

I AM is a divine descriptive title that refers to the preearthly Jehovah, who was known on the earth as Jesus Christ. This name-title emphasizes the eternal nature of the power, authority, might, mission, and calling of Jesus Christ. Unfortunately, the translators of the Bible have not understood the nature and significance of these words. The King James Version of the Bible punctuates John 8:58 as follows:

 

“Before Abraham was, I am.” This is confusing in syntax as well as in meaning. The verse would more correctly be punctuated: “Before Abraham, was I AM,” indicating that Jesus Christ was the great Jehovah, the preexistent One, who was a God before Abraham, was even born on the earth.

 

Selected Quotations

 

“Christ revealed Himself in the Old Testament as ‘I am,’ —Hebrew, ‘Ehyeh ‘asher ‘Ehyeh (Ex. 3:14Ex. 3:14), which implies that, while He is, or exists, and is therefore different from all non-existing deities of merely human imagination, He is not an abstract existence without form or substance, but He is a real Being, manifesting Himself in history ever anew; He is always with His people, active for their welfare.” (Smith and Sjodahl, DCC, p. 86.)

 

“When Moses was tending the flocks of his father-in-law, Jethro, at Horeb, the mountain of God, the Lord appeared to him in a flaming bush and gave him commandment to go to Egypt and lead Israel from bondage. Moses said to the Lord: ‘Behold, when I come unto the children of Israel, and shall say unto them, The God of our Fathers hath sent me unto you; and they shall say to me, What is his name? What shall I say unto them? And God said unto Moses, I am that I am; and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I Am hath sent me unto you.’

 

“When Jesus was contending with the Jews, and they were boasting of their descent from Abraham, he said to them: ‘Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day: and he saw it and was glad. Then said the Jews unto him, Thou art not yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham? Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am.’ (John 8:56-58.) Observe, he did not say, ‘Before Abraham was, I was.’

 

“The name given to Moses is the same as given by Jesus Christ to the Jews, and the meaning of it is expressed in the saying that God is ‘omnipotent, omnipresent, and omniscient; without beginning of days or end of life; and that in him every good gift and every good principle dwell.’ (Lecture on Faith, No. 2.) Jesus declared to the Jews that which they were incapable of understanding, which is that the great I Am who appeared to Moses, was himself, and that he was God and gave commandments to Abraham.

 

“In [Sec. 38] we again have our Lord declaring himself as ‘the great I Am, Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end.’” (Joseph Fielding Smith, CHMR 1:165-66.)

 

Scriptural References:

 

D&C 39:1;Ex. 3:14 Ex. 3:14; John 8:58.

 

 

(Daniel H. Ludlow, A Companion to Your Study of the New Testament: The Four Gospels [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1982], 136.)

 

 

 

Moses learns that God is always here, He is ongoing “I AM, HE IS” never changing, always celestial.

 

Jehovah, Jesus Christ

 

The Godhead consists of three separate and distinct beings: the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost (D&C 130:22; A of F 1). While some Christians do not equate Jesus Christ and Jehovah in their theologies, biblical passages indicate that relationship, and latter-day scriptures often refer to Jesus Christ, the Son, as Jehovah (e.g., D&C 110:3-4; Moro. 10:34).

 

The name Jehovah is an anglicized rendering of the tetragrammaton YHWH, a proper noun in biblical Hebrew that identifies God. Following a Jewish tradition that avoided pronouncing God’s name, translators of the King James Version rendered almost all occurrences of YHWH as “Lord.” Latter-day Saints view many other occurrences of “Lord” as references to Jehovah, both in the New Testament and in LDS scripture.

 

Since his premortal life, Jesus Christ has functioned as the constant associate of the Father working under his direction. In 1916 the First Presidency and the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles issued a doctrinal statement on the relationship between the Father and the Son: “Jesus the Son has represented and yet represents Elohim His Father in power and authority. This is true of Christ in His preexistent, antemortal, or unembodied state, in the which He was known as Jehovah; also during His embodiment in the flesh; …and since that period in His resurrected state” (MFP 5:31-32).

 

Throughout scripture, several roles of Jehovah-Jesus Christ are specifically identified.

 

CREATOR. Jehovah as Creator is attested throughout the Old Testament (e.g., Ps. 24:1-2). Speaking to Moses, God said, “Worlds without number have I created; …and by the Son I created them, which is mine Only Begotten” (Moses 1:33). John and others acknowledged Jesus as the Word, the Creator: “In the beginning was the Word; …all things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made” (John 1:1-3, 14; cf. Eph. 3:9; Col. 1:16). Similarly, the Book of Mormon teaches, “The Lord Omnipotent who reigneth, who was, and is from all eternity to all eternity, shall come down from heaven among the children of men…. And he shall be called Jesus Christ, the Son of God, the Father of heaven and earth, the Creator of all things from the beginning” (Mosiah 3:5-8; cf. 2 Ne. 9:5; 3 Ne. 9:15).

 

LAWGIVER. To Moses, Jehovah identified himself by the title “I AM THAT I AM”-a variation on the verbal root of YHWH (ex. 3:14Ex. 3:14). This title was claimed by Jesus in mortality: “Before Abraham was, I am” (John 8:58; cf. John 4:26). After his resurrection, Jesus told hearers in the Americas, “Behold, I am he that gave the law, and I am he who covenanted with my people Israel; therefore, the law in me is fulfilled, for I have come to fulfil the law” (3 Ne. 15:5; cf. Matt. 5:17).

 

REDEEMER, DELIVERER, AND ADVOCATE. Jehovah delivered the children of Israel from Egypt. Paul taught that this same being would redeem mankind from sin and death (cf. 1 Cor. 10:1-4). This point is made clear in the Book of Mormon: “The God of our fathers, who were led out of Egypt,…yea, the God of Abraham…yieldeth himself…as a man, into the hands of wicked men…to be crucified” (1 Ne. 19:10; cf. 2 Ne. 9:1-26; Mosiah 13:33-35). When the Savior appeared to the Prophet Joseph Smith in the Kirtland Temple on April 3, 1836, “his voice was as the sound of the rushing of great waters, even the voice of Jehovah, saying: I am the first and the last; I am he who liveth, I am he who was slain; I am your advocate with the Father” (D&C 110:3-4).

 

JUDGE. The Book of Mormon prophet Moroni 2 drew attention to “the great Jehovah, the Eternal Judge” (Moro. 10:34), reaffirming what the Psalmist and others had said (e.g., Ps. 9:7-8; Isa. 33:22). Jesus Christ proclaimed that he was the judge: “For the Father…hath committed all judgment unto the Son” (John 5:22, 27; cf. Acts 10:42).

 

IN HIS NAME. In the beginning, men began “to call upon the name of the Lord” (Gen. 4:25, 26; cf. Moses 5:8; 6:4). In Moses’s time Jehovah instructed the priests to “put my name upon the children of Israel” (Num. 6:27; cf. Deut. 28:10). Before the coming of Christ, Book of Mormon people took upon themselves his name (Mosiah 5:8-12; Alma 34:38; see Jesus Christ, Taking the Name of Upon Oneself). In all dispensations, the name of Christ is the only name “whereby salvation can come unto the children of men” (Isa. 43:3, 11; Mosiah 3:17; Acts 4:12; cf. Moses 5:7-9).

 

Divine names and titles, especially in the Bible, are occasionally ambiguous. The distinction between the Father and the Son is sometimes unclear. For example, the Hebrew term racti-a title usually applied to the Father by Latter-day Saints-often refers to Jehovah in the Bible (e.g., Isa. 12:2). Furthermore, people prayed to Jehovah as if he were the Father. In some cases, ambiguity may be due to the transmission of the text; in others, it may be explained by divine investiture wherein Christ is given the authority of the Father: “Thus the Father placed His name upon the Son; and Jesus Christ spoke and ministered in and through the Father’s name; and so far as power, authority, and Godship are concerned His words and acts were and are those of the Father” (MFP 5:32).

 

Bibliography

 

Talmage, James E. JC, pp. 32-41.

DAVID R. SEELY

 

 

(Encyclopedia of Mormonism, 1-4 vols., edited by Daniel H. Ludlow (New York: Macmillan, 1992), 720.)

 

 

 

  1. Moses questions God’s power

 

Before Moses leaves for Egypt he experiences the events in the Book of Moses in the Pearl of Great Price.

 

Moses is taken to a high mountain, he is taken into the presence of God (Jesus) who delivers a message from the Father, and Christ represents God on the earth, like a father speaking to a son.

 

 

Jesus Christ as Father

 

“Father because of the Atonement. Our scriptures teach that Jesus Christ is both the Father and the Son. The simple truth is that he is the Son of God by birth, both in the spirit and in the flesh. He is the Father because of the work that he has performed. . . .

 

“The Savior becomes our Father, in the sense in which this term is used in the scriptures, because he offers us life, eternal life, through the atonement which he made for us. . . .

 

“So, we become the children, sons and daughters of Jesus Christ, through our covenants of obedience to him. Because of his divine authority and sacrifice on the cross, we become spiritually begotten sons and daughters, and he is our Father.

 

“Father by divine investiture of authority. Christ is also our Father because his Father has given him of his fulness; that is, he has received a fulness of the glory of the Father. This is taught in Doctrine and Covenants 93:1-5, 16-17, and also by Abinadi in the 15th chapter of Mosiah. Abinadi’s statement that he is ‘the Father, because he was conceived by the power of God,’ harmonizes with the Lord’s own words in section 93 that he is the Father because he has received of the fulness of the Father. Christ says he is the Son because, ‘I was in the world and made flesh my tabernacle, and dwelt among the sons of men.’ Abinadi expresses this truth by saying he is ‘the Son because of the flesh.’

 

“The Father has honored Christ by placing his name upon him, so that he can minister in and through that name as though he were the Father; and thus, so far as power and authority are concerned, his words and acts become and are those of the Father.

 

“Father as Creator. Our Lord is also called the Father in the sense that he is the Father or Creator of the heavens and the earth and all things.” (Joseph Fielding Smith, DS 1:28-30.)

 

 

(Daniel H. Ludlow, A Companion to Your Study of the New Testament: The Four Gospels [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1982], 148.)

 

 

Reality = the place where God dwells, His physical characteristics, God’s actions and intentions, what He is and where He is. 

 

Here is not a real reality because it ends and is ever changing; also it hasn’t always existed like Gods world does.

 

We learn reality from the scriptures, but mainly through the TEMPLE! 

 

 

 

 

The Grandeur of God

Elder Jeffery R. Holland
Of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles
Ensign, Nov. 2003, pp. ??

[Note: Original footnotes have been placed within the text.]

Of the many magnificent purposes served in the life and ministry of the Lord Jesus Christ, one great aspect of that mission often goes uncelebrated. His followers did not understand it fully at the time, and many in modern Christianity do not grasp it now, but the Savior Himself spoke of it repeatedly and emphatically. It is the grand truth that in all that Jesus came to say and do, including and especially in His atoning suffering and sacrifice, He was showing us who and what God our Eternal Father is like, how completely devoted He is to His children in every age and nation. In word and in deed Jesus was trying to reveal and make personal to us the true nature of His Father, our Father in Heaven.

He did this at least in part because then and now all of us need to know God more fully in order to love Him more deeply and obey Him more completely. As both Old and New Testaments declare, “The first of all the commandments is . . . thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength: this is the first [and great] commandment” (Mark 12:29-30; see also Matthew 22:37-38; Deuteronomy 6:5).

Little wonder then that the Prophet Joseph Smith taught: “It is the first principle of the gospel to know for a certainty the character of God.” “I want you all to know Him,” he said, “and to be familiar with Him” (History of the Church, 6:305.). We must have “a correct idea of his . . . perfections, and attributes,” an admiration for “the excellency of [His] character” (Lectures on Faith (1985), 38, 42.). Thus the first phrase we utter in the declaration of our faith is, “We believe in God, the Eternal Father” (Articles of Faith 1:1.). So, emphatically, did Jesus. Even as He acknowledged His own singular role in the divine plan, the Savior nevertheless insisted on this prayerful preamble: “And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God” (John 17:3).

After generations of prophets had tried to teach the family of man the will and the way of the Father, usually with little success, God in His ultimate effort to have us know Him, sent to earth His Only Begotten and perfect Son, created in His very likeness and image, to live and serve among mortals in the everyday rigors of life.

To come to earth with such a responsibility, to stand in place of Elohim-speaking as He would speak, judging and serving, loving and warning, forbearing and forgiving as He would do-this is a duty of such staggering proportions that you and I cannot comprehend such a thing. But in the loyalty and determination that would be characteristic of a divine child, Jesus could comprehend it and He did it. Then, when the praise and honor began to come, He humbly directed all adulation to the Father.

“The Father . . . doeth the works,” He said in earnest. “The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do: for what things soever [the Father] doeth, these also doeth the Son likewise” (John 14:10; 5:19). On another occasion He said: “I speak that which I have seen with my Father.” “I do nothing of myself; but as my Father hath taught me.” “I came down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but the will of him that sent me” (John 8:38, 28; 6:38).

I make my own heartfelt declaration of God our Eternal Father this morning because some in the contemporary world suffer from a distressing misconception of Him. Among these there is a tendency to feel distant from the Father, even estranged from Him, if they believe in Him at all. And if they do believe, many moderns say they might feel comfortable in the arms of Jesus, but they are uneasy contemplating the stern encounter of God (see William Barclay, The Mind of Jesus (1961), especially the chapter “Looking at the Cross” for a discussion of this modern tendency). Through a misreading (and surely, in some cases, a mistranslation) of the Bible, these see God the Father and Jesus Christ His Son as operating very differently, this in spite of the fact that in both the Old Testament and the New, the Son of God is one and the same, acting as He always does under the direction of the Father, who is Himself the same “yesterday, today, and forever” (for example, 1 Ne. 10:18; 2 Nephi 27:23; Moroni 10:19; D&C 20:12).

In reflecting on these misconceptions we realize that one of the remarkable contributions of the Book of Mormon is its seamless, perfectly consistent view of divinity throughout that majestic book. Here there is no Malachi-to-Matthew gap, no pause while we shift theological gears, no misreading the God who is urgently, lovingly, faithfully at work on every page of that record from its Old Testament beginning to its New Testament end. Yes, in an effort to give the world back its Bible and a correct view of Deity with it, what we have in the Book of Mormon is a uniform view of God in all His glory and goodness, all His richness and complexity-including and especially as again demonstrated through a personal appearance of His Only Begotten Son, Jesus Christ.

How grateful we are for all the scriptures, especially the scriptures of the Restoration that teach us the majesty of each member of the Godhead. How we would thrill, for example, if all the world would receive and embrace the view of the Father so movingly described in the Pearl of Great Price.

There, in the midst of a grand vision of humankind which heaven opened to his view, Enoch, observing both the blessings and challenges of mortality, turns his gaze toward the Father and is stunned to see Him weeping. He says in wonder and amazement to this most powerful Being in the universe: “How is it that thou canst weep? . . . Thou art just [and] merciful and kind forever; . . . Peace . . . is the habitation of thy throne; and mercy shall go before thy face and have no end; how is it thou canst weep?”

Looking out on the events of almost any day, God replies: “Behold these thy brethren; they are the workmanship of mine own hands. . . . I gave unto them . . . [a] commandment, that they should love one another, and that they should choose me, their Father; but behold, they are without affection, and they hate their own blood. . . . Wherefore should not the heavens weep, seeing these shall suffer?” (Moses 7:29-33, 37)

That single, riveting scene does more to teach the true nature of God than any theological treatise could ever convey. It also helps us understand much more emphatically that vivid moment in the Book of Mormon allegory of the olive tree, when after digging and dunging, watering and weeding, trimming, pruning, transplanting, and grafting, the great Lord of the vineyard throws down his spade and his pruning shears and weeps, crying out to any who would listen, “What could I have done more for my vineyard?” (Jacob 5:41; see also vv. 47, 49)

What an indelible image of God’s engagement in our lives! What anguish in a parent when His children do not choose Him nor “the gospel of God” He sent! (Romans 1:1) How easy to love someone who so singularly loves us!

Of course the centuries-long drift away from belief in such a perfect and caring Father hasn’t been helped any by the man-made creeds of erring generations which describe God variously as unknown and unknowable----formless, passionless, elusive, ethereal, simultaneously everywhere and nowhere at all. Certainly that does not describe the Being we behold through the eyes of these prophets. Nor does it match the living, breathing, embodied Jesus of Nazareth who was and is in “the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his [Father]” (Hebrews 1:3; see also 2 Corinthians 4:4; Colossians 1:15).

In that sense Jesus did not come to improve God’s view of man nearly so much as He came to improve man’s view of God and to plead with them to love their Heavenly Father as He has always and will always love them. The plan of God, the power of God, the holiness of God, yes, even the anger and the judgment of God they had occasion to understand. But the love of God, the profound depth of His devotion to His children, they still did not fully know-until Christ came.

So feeding the hungry, healing the sick, rebuking hypocrisy, pleading for faith-this was Christ showing us the way of the Father, He who is “merciful and gracious, slow to anger, long-suffering and full of goodness” (Lectures on Faith, 42). In His life and especially in His death, Christ was declaring, “This is God’s compassion I am showing you, as well as that of my own.” In the perfect Son’s manifestation of the perfect Father’s care, in Their mutual suffering and shared sorrow for the sins and heartaches of the rest of us, we see ultimate meaning in the declaration: “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved” (John 3:16-17).

I bear personal witness this day of a personal, living God, who knows our names, hears and answers prayers, and cherishes us eternally as children of His spirit. I testify that amidst the wondrously complex tasks inherent in the universe, He seeks our individual happiness and safety above all other godly concerns. We are created in His very image and likeness (see Genesis 1:26-27; Moses 2:26-27), and Jesus of Nazareth, His Only Begotten Son in the flesh, came to earth as the perfect mortal manifestation of His grandeur. In addition to the witness of the ancients we also have the modern miracle of Palmyra, the appearance of God the Father and His Beloved Son, the Savior of the world, to the boy prophet Joseph Smith. I testify of that appearance, and in the words of that prophet I, too, declare: “Our heavenly Father is more liberal in His views, and boundless in His mercies and blessings, than we are ready to believe or receive. . . . God does not look on sin with [the least degree of] allowance, but . . . the nearer we get to our heavenly Father, the more we are disposed to look with compassion on perishing souls; we feel that we want to take them upon our shoulders, and cast their sins behind our backs” (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, Sel Joseph Fielding Smith [1976], 257, 240-41).

I bear witness of a God who has such shoulders. And in the spirit of the holy apostleship, I say as did one who held this office anciently: “Herein [then] is love, not that we loved God, but that he loved us, and sent his Son to be the propitiation for our sins. Beloved, if God so loved us, we ought also to love one another”(1 John 4:10)-and to love Him forever, I pray. In the sacred name of Jesus Christ, amen.

Moses 1:3-4 – God is endless, He shows Moses (His son, like all of us) His glory.

 

Temple :  A temple is like a miniature universe.  We go to the temple to learn reality, where God is, what He is like, and what He does, His nature and character.  We also learn who we are in the universe.  When we learn reality, our faith increases.  Moses lacked faith at the beginning, he doubted.

 

Faith:  1. Absolute confidence in things we cannot see.  Moses needed absolute confidence before going to Egypt, so he could do what he was asked to do. 

 

We need absolute confidence in the atonement.

 

2. Combined with action

 

 

3. That is in absolute confidence to the will of God.  (You need personal revelation to do this.)

 

 

Shall He Find Faith on the Earth

Elder Joseph B. Wirthlin
Quorum of the Twelve Apostles
Ensign, Nov. 2002, pp. 82-84

That was the most beautiful rendition of a magnificent song, “A Poor Wayfaring Man of Grief,” which was the favorite of the Prophet Joseph and his brother Hyrum. What a beautiful performance from the choir and orchestra.

I pray I may have the Spirit of the Lord with me that has been with us during our conference, that I may say those things that will be beneficial to members of the Church and those who are not members. I feel very humble in this assignment.

Today I ask a question the Savior asked nearly 2,000 years ago: “When the Son of man cometh, shall he find faith on the earth?” (Luke 18:8)

First Principle of the Gospel

What is true faith? Faith is defined as “belief and trust in and loyalty to God; . . . firm belief in something for which there is no proof” (Webster’s Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary (1984), “Faith,” p. 446). We believe that “faith is to hope for things which are not seen, but which are true . . . , and must be centered in Jesus Christ.” In fact, we believe that “faith in Jesus Christ is the first principle of the gospel” (Bible Dictionary, “Faith,” pp. 669-70).

A Widow’s Faith

There are those who can teach us regarding faith if we will but open our hearts and our minds. One such person is a woman whose husband had died. Left alone to raise her son, she had tried to find ways of supporting herself, but she lived in a time of terrible famine. Food was scarce and many were perishing because of hunger.

As available food diminished, so did the woman’s chance of surviving. Every day, she watched helplessly as her meager supply of food decreased.

Hoping for relief but finding none, the woman finally realized the day had come when she had only enough food for one last meal.

It was then that a stranger approached and asked the unthinkable. “Bring me, I pray thee,” he said to her, “a morsel of bread.”

The woman turned to the man and said, “As the Lord thy God liveth, I have not a cake, but an handful of meal in a barrel, and a little oil in a cruse.” She told him she was about to prepare it as a last meal for herself and her son, “that we may eat it, and die.”

She did not know that the man before her was the prophet Elijah, sent to her by the Lord. What this prophet told her next may seem surprising to those today who do not understand the principle of faith.

“Fear not,” he said to her, “but make me thereof a little cake first, and bring it unto me, and after make for thee and for thy son.”

Can you imagine what she must have thought? What she must have felt? She hardly had time to reply when the man continued, “For thus saith the Lord God of Israel, The barrel of meal shall not waste, neither shall the cruse of oil fail, until the day that the Lord sendeth rain upon the earth.”

The woman, after hearing this prophetic promise, went in faith and did as Elijah had directed. “And she, and he, and her house, did eat many days. And the barrel of meal wasted not, neither did the cruse of oil fail, according to the word of the Lord, which he spake by Elijah” (see 1 Kings 17:11-16).

In the wisdom of our day, the prophet’s request may seem unfair and selfish. In the wisdom of our day, the widow’s response may appear foolish and unwise. That is largely because we often learn to make decisions based upon what we see. We make decisions based on the evidence before us and what appears to be in our immediate best interest.

“Faith,” on the other hand, “is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen (Hebrews 11:1; see also Hebrews 11:2 -40; Ether 12:7-22.). Faith has eyes that penetrate the darkness, seeing into the light beyond. “Your faith should not stand in the wisdom of men, but in the power of God” (1 Cor,. 2:5)

Failure to Exercise Faith

Too often today, we do not rely on faith so much as on our own ability to reason and solve problems. If we become ill, modern medicine can work healing miracles. We can travel great distances in a short time. We have at our fingertips information that 500 years ago would have made the poorest man a prince.

True Faith

“The just shall live by faith”(Romans 1:7), we are told in holy writ. I ask again, What is faith?

Faith exists when absolute confidence in that which we cannot see combines with action that is in absolute conformity to the will of our Heavenly Father. Without all three–first, absolute confidence; second, action; and third, absolute conformity–without these three all we have is a counterfeit, a weak and watered-down faith. Let me discuss each of these three imperatives of faith.

First, we must have confidence in that which we cannot see. When Thomas finally felt the prints of the nails and thrust his hand into the side of the resurrected Savior, he confessed that he, at last, believed.

“Jesus saith unto him, Thomas, because thou hast seen me, thou hast believed: blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed” (John 20:29).

Peter echoed those words when he praised early followers for their faith in Jesus the Christ. He said:

“Whom having not seen, ye love; in whom, though now ye see him not, yet believing, ye rejoice with joy unspeakable and full of glory:

“Receiving the end of your faith, even the salvation of your souls” (1 Peter 1:8-9).

Second, for our faith to make a difference, we must act. We must do all that is in our power to change passive belief into active faith, for truly, “faith, if it hath not works, is dead” (James 2:17).

In 1998, President Gordon B. Hinckley raised a voice of warning to the Saints of this Church as well as to the world at large. He uttered that same warning last night at priesthood meeting. He said: “I am suggesting that the time has come to get our houses in order. So many people are living on the very edge of their incomes. In fact, some are living on borrowings. . . . I am troubled by the huge consumer installment debt which hangs over the people of the nation, including our own people” (“To the Boys and to the Men,” Ensign, Nov. 1998, 53; Liahona, Jan. 1999, 65).

Brothers and sisters, when these prophetic words were uttered, some faithful members of the Church mustered their faith and heeded the counsel of the prophet. They are profoundly grateful today that they did. Others perhaps believed that what the prophet said was true but lacked faith, even as small as a grain of mustard seed. Consequently, some have suffered financial, personal, and family distress.

Third, one’s faith should be consistent with the will of our Heavenly Father, including His laws of nature. The sparrow flying into a hurricane may believe that he can successfully navigate the storm, but the unforgiving natural law will convince him otherwise in the end.

Are we wiser than the sparrow? Often what passes for faith in this world is little more than gullibility. It is distressing to see how eager some people are to embrace fads and theories while rejecting or giving less credence and attention to the everlasting principles of the gospel of Jesus Christ. It is distressing how eagerly some rush into foolish or unethical behavior, believing that God will somehow deliver them from the inevitable tragic consequences of their actions. They even go so far as to ask for the blessings of heaven, knowing in their hearts that what they do is contrary to the will of our Father in Heaven.

How do we know when our faith conforms to the will of our Heavenly Father and He approves of that which we seek? We must know the word of God. One of the reasons we immerse ourselves in the scriptures is to know of Heavenly Father’s dealings with man from the beginning. If the desires of our heart are contrary to scripture, then we should not pursue them further.

Next, we must heed the counsel of latter-day prophets as they give inspired instruction.

Additionally, we must ponder and pray and seek the guidance of the Spirit. If we do so, the Lord has promised, “I will tell you in your mind and in your heart, by the Holy Ghost, which shall come upon you and which shall dwell in your heart” (D&C 8:2).

Only when our faith is aligned with the will of our Heavenly Father will we be empowered to receive the blessings we seek.

Principle of Power

Truly understood and properly practiced, faith is one of the grand and glorious powers of eternity. It is a force powerful beyond our comprehension. “Through faith . . . the worlds were framed by the word of God” (Heb. 11:3). Through faith, waters are parted, the sick healed, the wicked silenced, and salvation made possible.

Our faith is the foundation upon which all our spiritual lives rest. It should be the most important resource of our lives. Faith is not so much something we believe; faith is something we live.

Remember the words of the Savior: “If thou canst believe, all things are possible to him that believeth” (Mark 9:23). “He that believeth on me, the works that I do shall he do also; and greater works than these shall he do” (John 14:12).

Teaching the Principle

Those who walk in faith will feel their lives encompassed with the light and blessings of heaven. They will understand and know things that others cannot. Those who do not walk in faith esteem the things of the Spirit as foolishness, for the things of the Spirit can only be discerned by the Spirit (see 1 Cor. 2:14).

The manifestations of heaven are sealed from the understanding of those who do not believe. “For if there be no faith among the children of men,” Moroni tells us, “God can do no miracle among them; wherefore, he showed not himself until after their faith” (Ethere 12:12).

Yet throughout history, even in times of darkness there were those who, through eyes of faith, pierced the darkness and beheld things as they truly are. Moroni reveals that “there were many whose faith was so exceedingly strong . . . [they] could not be kept from within the veil, but truly saw with their eyes the things which they had beheld with an eye of faith, and they were glad” (Hebrews 11:3).

Our homes should be havens of faith. Mothers and fathers should teach the principles of faith to their children. Grandparents, too, can help. When I’m at a family gathering, I try to spend time, when appropriate, to have a one-on-one discussion with some of our grandchildren. I sit with them and ask them a few questions: “How are you doing?” “How is school?”

Then I ask them how they feel about the true Church, which means so much to me. I try to discover the depth of their faith and testimony. If I perceive areas of uncertainty, I’ll ask them, “Would you accept a goal from your granddad?”

Then I’ll suggest they read the scriptures daily and recommend they kneel down every morning and night and pray with their father and mother and have personal prayers. I admonish them to go to their sacrament meetings. I admonish them always to keep themselves pure and clean, always attend their meetings, and finally, among other things, always strive to be sensitive to the whisperings of the Lord.

Now one time after a talk with Joseph, our eight-year-old grandson, he looked into my eyes and asked this pointed question: “May I go now, Granddad?” He ran from my arms and I thought, “Did I do any good?” Apparently I did, because the next day he said, “Thanks for the little talk we had.”

If we approach them with love rather than reproach, we will find that the faith of our grandchildren will increase as a result of the influence and testimony of someone who loves the Savior and His divine Church.

Trials

Sometimes the world appears dark. Sometimes our faith is tried. Sometimes we feel that the heavens are closed against us. Yet we should not despair. We should never abandon our faith. We should not lose hope.

A few years ago, I began to notice that things around me were beginning to darken. It troubled me because simple things like reading the print in my scriptures were becoming more difficult. I wondered what had happened to the quality of the lightbulbs and wondered why manufacturers today couldn’t make things like they had in years past.

I replaced the bulbs with brighter ones. They, too, became dim. I blamed the poor design of the lamps and bulbs. I even questioned whether the brightness of the sun was fading before the thought occurred to me that the problem might not be with the amount of light in the room–the problem might be with my own eyes.

Shortly thereafter, I went to an ophthalmologist who assured me that the world was not going dark at all. A cataract on my eye was the reason the light seemed to be fading. This certainly gives you my age. I placed my faith in the capable hands of this trained specialist, the cataract was removed, and behold, light again flooded my life! The light had never diminished; only my capacity to see the light had been lessened.

This taught me a profound truth. Often when the world seems dark, when the heavens seem distant, we seek to blame everything around us, when the real cause of the darkness may be a lack of faith within ourselves.

Be of good cheer. Have faith and confidence. The Lord will not forsake you.

The Lord has promised if we “search diligently, pray always, and be believing, and all things shall work together for your good, if ye walk uprightly” (D&C 90:24).

I know, as did Alma of old, that “whosoever shall put their trust in God shall be supported in their trials, and their troubles, and their afflictions, and shall be lifted up at the last day” (Alma 36:3).

Our Heavenly Father is a powerful, moving, directing being. While we may, at times, bear burdens of sorrow, pain, and grief; while we may struggle to understand trials of faith we are called to pass through; while life may seem dark and dreary–through faith, we have absolute confidence that a loving Heavenly Father is at our side.

As the Apostle Paul promised, “Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ” (Romans 5:1).

And one day, we will fully see through the darkness into the light. We will understand His eternal plan, His mercy, and His love.

“When the Son of man cometh, shall he find faith on the earth?”

Perhaps as members of the Church trust with all their hearts, transform their hopes and beliefs into action, and seek to align themselves with the will of the Lord, the answer to the question the Savior asked 2,000 years ago will be a resounding “Yes, He will find faith. He will find faith among those who take upon themselves His name. He will find it among those who are living His divine principles.”

Testimony

I testify that through our prophet, seer, and revelator, President Gordon B. Hinckley, our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, speaks to all of us today. I testify the gospel was restored in its fulness through the Prophet Joseph Smith. Faith, an eternal power, is a gift from our Heavenly Father for all mankind. To this eternal truth I bear my personal witness in the name of Jesus Christ, amen.

Moses is brought into the presence of God to learn reality.

 

Things Moses Learned

 

  1. Moses 1:2 – He saw God face to face and spoke to Him

 

  1. Gods glory literally changed Moses body so he could abide and endure His presence

 

 

  1. He felt Gods power.  The purpose of the plagues was to let the Egyptians know that the God of Israel was more powerful, mightier then their own Gods.

 

 

Jesus Christ is all powerful because He is like the Father, and we need to know what the Father is like so we can have faith in God.

 

You don’t need to be a prophet to have absolute confidence; the pioneers had absolute confidence in order to endure what they did.

 

Moses 1:3-4 – Heaven is endless, and Moses is His son and has potential to be what his Father is.

 

Moses 2 – God creates through a successive progressive order through His son Jesus Christ.  Moses is shown the creation of the world.

 

 

The Cosmos does form a pattern. Cosmos means “organization, order.” Cosmetic, cosmology, means “putting things in order.” With cosmetics, you put your face in order — your eyes up where they belong, your nose approximately in between them, etc. Roughly, you push things around and get some sort of order in your face. Typical is the Pistis Sophia, a very important Coptic work. “There is an appointed place for everything in the Cosmos,” it says. There is a numbering of souls for each world: and a dispensation is not completed until the teleos (“completed”) number has been fulfilled for that dispensation. Every soul stays in its appointed place until it has fulfilled the task for the topos, for that place. Fn “God plans times and seasons for all things,” says the newly discovered and very important work, the Apocryphon of John. Fn The Dead Sea Scrolls are full of set times: a time for iniquity, the time allotted for Satan to tempt mankind, and a time of suffering and a time for punishment — all exactly prescribed from the beginning. The Archons wanted to check Adam’s power by limiting his time (on earth), but they couldn’t, “because all times were fixed by God’s plan in the premortal existence.” “For the kairos is fixed, and the limit set for every individual according to the way prescribed for the ‘Sons of Light,’ “ according to the Scrolls. Fn

 

It is well understood that all of this setting of times is constructed according to our nature, not according to God’s nature. Time is for our testing — like holding a stop watch on a particular process to see how things have been going. All this time and place business is characteristic of this particular world. “For [God], there of course is not time,” says the Apocryphon of John; fn Alma says the same thing (Alma 40:8).

 

“If you ever set yourself to build,” advises the newly discovered Manichaean Songbook, “let the measuring come first for you. If you build without a measuring device in your hand, your building will be crooked. Measurement is the very essence of construction.” Fn “The whole creation,” says Clement of Alexandria, “is to be understood as a synthesis: the imposing of inner order on outer material.” It’s a progressive organizing of materials from the center out. You first organize a center, and that structure becomes firm enough to organize more onto it. “And so this synthesis,” continues Clement of Alexandria, “is building from the center out, and organizing that way” fn — from an inner order to an outer material. This is the background material; more and more of it is absorbed into the system — all is organization and synthesis.

 

In the Apocalypse of Abraham, a very important Jewish discovery, Abraham hails God: “God! Thou who dost bring order into the confusion of the universe, ever preparing and renewing worlds for the righteous.” Fn The Codex Brucianus (a new document) says the same thing: Creation is organization, and God is ever bringing order into the universe and is progressively ever preparing and renewing worlds for the righteous. Fn

 

But it is not enough to arrange matter in order and system. Such matter remains, for all its pretty patterns, inert. If you organize it, you’ve just got a geometrical structure or something similar, but it’s still inert. It’s only background stuff. The Pistis Sophia says that, without light, matter is inert and helpless. Fn It must be improved by the action of light; according to these texts, you’ve got to put into it some animating principle. Whenever that active principle is withdrawn, the matter at once falls back into its original lifeless, inert condition. It’s like removing an electric current from a tube of one of the inert gases — the tube shines as long as the charge goes through it; remove the charge, and it becomes just nothing again. “Matter must be improved by the action of light,” and whenever the active principle is withdrawn, it at once falls back into its original lifeless, inert condition (like the inert gas argon). This vitalizing principle is referred to everywhere as “the spark,” which you must have if anything is to happen. “Without this spark,” says a very important new work called the Second Coptic Gnostic Work, “there is no awareness,” fn no consciousness. The electric eye that opens the door for you when you go into the supermarket is not conscious of you; that is, it’s not thinking at all. It’s purely automatic. An awareness, a consciousness, must be added to the electric eye, or it has no mind at all. That is the difference: things just automatically reacting, or, having a mind.

 

 

(Hugh Nibley, Temple and Cosmos: Beyond This Ignorant Present, edited by Don E. Norton [Salt Lake City and Provo: Deseret Book Co., Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies, 1992], 272.)

 

D&C 93 – Order of Creation

 

Intelligence

 

Pre Mortality – (Day 1) – God organized our intelligence and created us spiritually.  We were given divine potential inherent within us we grew in our spiritual state.

 

Mortality – (Day 2) – Physical body, enemy of God, sensual and devilish

 

Spirit World – (Day 3)

 

Millennium – (Day 4) – 1000 years we learn to control our resurrected body, we learn how to use it to become like God.  Or we go to the other lower kingdoms.

 

Celestial Kingdom

 

Moses and we are shown progression; God shows how He brings things about.  If He can create an earth He can help us gain immortality.

 

The only power we have is our agency (power to act) we can increase our agency by our choices or decrease our agency by our choices.

 

The Plan:  We need to learn how to increase our agency so we can become like God.

 

Moses 1:39 – Gods purpose!

 

 

 

 

Continuation of Moses 1-2

 

 

 

(Moses 1:6.) – Moses mission was to redeem Israel out of bondage

 

6 And I have a work for thee, Moses, my son; and thou art in the similitude of mine Only Begotten; and mine Only Begotten is and shall be the Savior, for he is full of grace and truth; but there is no God beside me, and all things are present with me, for I know them all.

 

 

 

Moses is not yet ready to accomplish the task; he doesn’t have sufficient faith so he needs to understand the power of God and His characteristics, (Omniscience, Omnipotent)

 

The Omniscience of an Omnipotent and Omniloving God

 

Few doctrines, save those pertaining to the reality of the existence of God, are more basic than the truth that God is omniscient. “O how great the holiness of our God! For he knoweth all things, and there is not anything save he knows it.” (2 Nephi. 9:20.) Unfortunately, this truth is sometimes only passively assented to by individuals who avoid exploring it and coming to understand its implications. Later on, such believers sometimes have difficulty with the implications of this core doctrine—which connects with other powerful doctrines such as the foreknowledge of God, foreordination, and foreassignment. The all-loving God who shapes our individual growing and sanctifying experiences—and then sees us through them—could not do so if He were not omniscient.

 

The word omniscient has, at times, been used carelessly, unnecessarily blurring our understanding of this very fundamental attribute of God. We read in the Prophet Joseph Smith’s Lectures on Faith that God is perfect in the attributes of divinity, and one of these is knowledge: “. . . seeing that without the knowledge of all things, God would not be able to save any portion of his creatures; for it is by reason of the knowledge which he has of all things, from the beginning to the end, that enables him to give that understanding to his creatures by which they are made partakers of eternal life; and if it were not for the idea existing in the minds of men that God had all knowledge it would be impossible for them to exercise faith in him.” (Lecture 4, paragraph 11.)

 

Joseph Smith also declared, “God is the only supreme governor and independent being in whom all fullness and perfection dwell; who is omnipotent, omnipresent and omniscient.” (Lecture 2, paragraph 2.)

 

God, who knows the beginning from the end, knows, therefore, all that is in between. He could not safely see us through our individual allotments of “all these things” that shall give us experience if He did not first know “all things.”

 

Below the scripture that declares that God knows “all things” there is no footnote reading “except that God is a little weak in geophysics”! We do not worship a God who simply forecasts a generally greater frequency of earthquakes in the last days before the second coming of His Son; He knows precisely when and where all these will occur. God has even prophesied that the Mount of Olives will cleave in twain at a precise latter-day time as Israel is besieged. (Zechariah 14:4.)

 

There are no qualifiers, only flat and absolute assertions of the omniscience of God such as these: “The Lord searcheth all hearts, and understandeth all.” (1 Chronicles 28:9.) The psalmist said that the Lord’s “understanding is infinite.” (Psalm 147:5.) “Now we are sure that thou knowest all things.” (John 16:30.) “The Lord knoweth all things which are to come.” (Words of Mormon 1:7.)

 

Mortals should not aspire to teach God that He is not omniscient by adding qualifiers that He has never used in the scriptures. Job rightly asked, “Shall any teach God knowledge?” (Job 21:22.)

 

The Lord could not know all things that are to come if He did not know all things that are past as well as all things that are present. Alma described God’s “foreknowledge” of all things and said also that God “comprehendeth all things.” (Alma 13:3; 26:35.) Indicating that omniscience is a hallmark of divinity, Helaman wrote, “Except he was a God he could not know of all things.” (Helaman 9:41.)

 

The Lord Himself said that He “knoweth all things, for all things are present” before Him. (D&C 38:2.) We read, too, that “all things are present with me, for I know them all.” (Moses 1:6.)

 

Therefore, God’s omniscience is not solely a function of prolonged and discerning familiarity with us—but of the stunning reality that the past and present and future are part of an “eternal now” with God! (Joseph Smith, History of the Church 4:597.)

 

Most, if not all of us, have been momentarily wrenched by the sound of a train whistle spilling into the night air—and we have been inexplicably subdued by the mix of memories and feelings it evokes. Perhaps, too, we have been beckoned by a lighted cottage across a snow-covered meadow at dusk. Or we have heard the distant but drawing soft laughter of children at play. Or we have been tugged at by the strains of singing from a nearby church. In such moments we have felt a deep yearning, as if we were outside something to which we belonged and of which we so much wanted again to be a part. The impact has been brief, to be sure—but real!

 

 

(Neal A. Maxwell, All These Things Shall Give Thee Experience [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1979], 6.) 

 

 

2. Let us here observe, that three things are necessary in order that any rational and intelligent being may exercise faith in God unto life and salvation.

 

3. First, the idea that he actually exists.

 

4. Secondly, a correct idea of his character, perfections, and attributes.

 

61      Thirdly, an actual knowledge that the course of life which he is pursuing is according to his will. For without an acquaintance with these three important facts, the faith of every rational being must be imperfect and unproductive; but with this understanding it can become perfect and fruitful, abounding in righteousness, unto the praise and glory of God the Father, and the Lord Jesus Christ.

 

 

(Lectures on Faith [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1985], 3:2-5)

 

 

Revelation is given so we can know these truths, idea to knowledge, a progressive step upward.  Doubt is a killer of faith.

 

Moses learns the correct idea of who God is:

 

A being who speaks to him face to face

Moses is His son

God is almighty, endless, and omniscient

 

Elder Jeffrey R. Holland,” Rending the Veil of Unbelief”

 

The first issue is suggested in two questions the Lord asks the brother of Jared during the vision as it unfolds: “Why hast thou fallen?” and “Sawest thou more than this?” It is a basic premise of Latter-day Saint theology that God “knoweth all things, and there is not anything save he knows it” (2 Nephi 9:20). The scriptures, both ancient and modern, are replete with this assertion of omniscience. Nevertheless, God has frequently asked questions of men, usually as a way to test their faith, measure their honesty, or allow their knowledge greater development. For example, he called unto Adam in the Garden of Eden, “Where art thou?” and later asks Eve, “What is this that thou hast done?” (Genesis 3:9, 13), yet an omniscient parent clearly knew the answer to both questions, for he could see where Adam was and he watched what Eve had done. It is obvious that the questions are for the children’s sake, giving Adam and Eve the responsibility of replying honestly. Later, in trying Abraham’s faith, God repeatedly called out regarding Abraham’s whereabouts, to which the faithful patriarch would answer: “Here am I” (Genesis 22:11). The purpose in this scriptural moment was not to provide God with information he already knew but to reaffirm Abraham’s fixed faith and unwavering position in the most difficult of all parental tests. These kinds of rhetorical questions are frequently used by God, particularly in assessing faith, honesty, and the full measure of agency, allowing the “students” the freedom and opportunity to express themselves as revealingly as they wish, even though God knows the answer to his own and all other questions.

(Nurturing Faith through the Book of Mormon: The 24th Annual Sidney B. Sperry Symposium [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1995], 14 – 15.)

 

 

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 8:2-3.)

 

2 Yea, behold, I will tell you in your mind and in your heart, by the Holy Ghost, which shall come upon you and which shall dwell in your heart.

 

3 Now, behold, this is the spirit of revelation; behold, this is the spirit by which Moses brought the children of Israel through the Red Sea on dry ground.

 

 

Moses knew the Red Sea would part because of the revelation he received from the Holy Ghost.

 

Moses 1:9 – Moses sees for himself the stark difference between God and man (our nothingness), we need to be changed to be in God’s presence and see as He sees, transfigured.

 

Satan comes to tempt Moses to worship him, he calls Moses a son of man, Moses responds in the next verse that he is a Son of God

 

(Moses 1:12-18.)

 

12 And it came to pass that when Moses had said these words, behold, Satan came tempting him, saying: Moses, son of man, worship me.

 

13 And it came to pass that Moses looked upon Satan and said: Who art thou? For behold, I am a son of God, in the similitude of his Only Begotten; and where is thy glory, that I should worship thee?

 

14 For behold, I could not look upon God, except his glory should come upon me, and I were transfigured before him. But I can look upon thee in the natural man. Is it not so, surely?

 

15 Blessed be the name of my God, for his Spirit hath not altogether withdrawn from me, or else where is thy glory, for it is darkness unto me? And I can judge between thee and God; for God said unto me: Worship God, for him only shalt thou serve.

 

16 Get thee hence, Satan; deceive me not; for God said unto me: Thou art after the similitude of mine Only Begotten.

 

17 And he also gave me commandments when he called unto me out of the burning bush, saying: Call upon God in the name of mine Only Begotten, and worship me.

 

18 And again Moses said: I will not cease to call upon God, I have other things to inquire of him: for his glory has been upon me, wherefore I can judge between him and thee. Depart hence, Satan.

 

Moses recognizes the difference between Satan (Luminosity) and God (Glory).  Moses can only see here and now with Satan, within God’s glory he saw all things, also he realizes he didn’t need to be physically changed with Satan like he had to be with God.

 

Light As an Aspect of Glory

 

A modern dictionary gives as a secondary definition of glory as “a ring or spot of light”; fn glory is therefore associated with “radiance.” The dictionary gives one the feeling that such association is very limited; that, however, is not the case in a dictionary available to Joseph Smith. According to that dictionary, glory is first and foremost “brightness, luster, and splendor.” Only in a secondary sense is it fame or praise. That dictionary notes that in a scriptural sense glory is a manifestation of the presence of God. Fn This meaning accords much better with Joseph Smith’s use of the term. For example, while recounting his first vision he wrote, “I saw a pillar of light exactly over my head, above the brightness of the sun, which descended gradually until it fell upon me. . . . I saw two Personages, whose brightness and glory defy all description.” (Joseph Smith-History 1:16-17.) Writing of this experience on another occasion he stated, “I was enwrapped in heavenly vision, and saw two glorious personages, who exactly resembled each other in features and likeness, surrounded with a brilliant light which eclipsed the sun at noon day.” Fn In these passages glory is directly associated with “radiance.” This association fits nicely with the idea expressed in Doctrine and Covenants 93 that light is a constituent part of glory.

 

To ancient Israel one of the important aspects of God was his ability to display his power through the manifestation of burning light. Indeed, Israel stood in awe because of the display of a brilliance like a devouring inferno on the top of Sinai. (Exodus 24:17.) Moses proclaimed, “the Lord thy God is a consuming fire.” (Deuteronomy 4:24.) His presence was manifest on more than one occasion by a pillar of fire, which gave light to Israel but vexed the Egyptians. (Exodus 13:21; 14:24.) The cloud of his glory dwelt upon the tabernacle while its radiance filled the court. (Exodus 40:34.) That this idea has continued into the present can be seen in the promise to the early Saints that “this generation shall not all pass away until an house shall be built unto the Lord, and a cloud shall rest upon it, which cloud shall be even the glory of the Lord, which shall fill the house.” (D&C 84:5.)

 

Like Moses, Joseph Smith knew well the glory associated with the presence of the Lord. Of His appearance in the Kirtland Temple Joseph Smith reported, “His eyes were as a flame of fire; . . . his countenance shone above the brightness of the sun.” (D&C 110:3.) When he comes the second time, we are told that he will be “clothed in the brightness of his glory.” (D&C 65:5.) These are only a few of many references suggesting that light and radiance are important aspects of glory.

 

Light and the Process of Salvation

 

Radiance in the normative sense is related to light. But what is light? A careful look at the way the term is used in the scriptures suggests that it is more than mere luminosity. We get a glimpse of the breadth of meaning ascribed to the word when the Lord states, “the light which shineth, which giveth you light, is through him who enlighteneth your eyes, which is the same light that quickeneth your understandings.” (D&C 88:11.) This phrase defines light not only as something that makes vision possible but also as that force which activates and stimulates the intellect. Further, light “is in all things,” gives “life to all things,” and “is the law by which all things are governed.” (D&C 88:13.) Thus, a more full definition would make light an ever-present, life- and law-giving power that manifests itself, among other ways, as natural light, intellectual activity, and the living energy in all things. The scriptures declare that this “light proceedeth forth from the presence of God to fill the immensity of space” and that it is “the power of God who sitteth upon his throne, who is in the bosom of eternity, who is in the midst of all things.” (D&C 88:12-13.)

 

These scriptures suggest that the term light is used to describe that aspect of the nature of God which radiates out from him expanding with his work and will, enlightening, organizing, capacitating, and quickening as it does.

 

In sum, light is the ever-present, life- and law-giving, intellectually and spiritually quickening aspect of the power of God. Perhaps the best definition would be living and capacitating energy. Thus, a scripture states, “That which is of God is light; and he that receiveth light, and continueth in God, receiveth more light; and that light racti brighter and brighter until the perfect day.” (D&C 50:24.) This scripture suggests that the continual reception of this living energy endows one with ability. Thus, the Lord states, “if your eye be single to my glory, your whole bodies shall be filled with light and there shall be no darkness in you; and that body which is filled with light comprehendeth all things.” (D&C 88:67.) As one increases in light he increases in ability until he is able to comprehend all things.

 

The Relationship between Light and Truth

 

One is not glorified in light, or as here defined, in power, or energy. Glorification is contingent upon the reception of the other, all-important element. Section 93 teaches us, “He that keepeth [God’s] commandments receiveth truth and light, until he is glorified in truth and knoweth all things.” (D&C 93:28; italics added.) The glorifying principle is truth. Defining truth, fn the scripture states, “truth is knowledge of things as they are, and as they were, and as they are to come.” (D&C 93:24.) In other words, truth is knowledge of what a Latter-day Saint hymn proclaims as “the sum of existence.” Fn Truth defined in this way is always associated with light because truth can only be acquired through the power or the capacitating force of light. Without the faculty created by light, a fulness of truth could never be gained.

 

The acquisition of both light and truth is dependent on obedience. Explaining the need and the reason for obedience, the Lord stated, “You shall live by every word that proceedeth forth from the mouth of God.” (D&C 84:44.) The explanation is simple: obedience is requisite for eternal life. Again the Lord explains why: “For the word of the Lord is truth, and whatsoever is truth is light, and whatsoever is light is Spirit, even the Spirit of Jesus Christ.” (D&C 84:45.) The factors of life—light and truth—are equated with the Spirit of Christ, because he alone controls their dissemination through the bestowal of his Spirit. Therefore, he can stipulate the means by which they are granted. Thus, obedience to his will is absolutely requisite for those who would gain life.

 

According to Doctrine and Covenants 131:7-8 all spirit is matter. If this includes the Spirit of Christ, then its bestowal upon an individual would be an imparting of actual celestial substance—actual elements producing higher power, higher capacity, higher life. The result of its infusion would be spiritual and intellectual capacitation, which would allow the individual to progress to the point that he could enjoy eternal life.

 

But the capacitating force of light would have to precede the possession of this celestial substance. The scripture continues, “And the Spirit giveth light to every man that cometh into the world; and the Spirit enlighteneth every man through the world, that hearkeneth to the voice of the Spirit. And every one that hearkeneth to the voice of the Spirit cometh unto God, even the Father.” (D&C 84:46-47.) Light, the capacitating power, and enlightenment, or truth, are received by acquisition of celestial element through the Spirit of Christ to those who obey the word. But, first comes obedience to the word, then light, and finally truth.

 

Thus, all—word, light, truth, Spirit—become one. They are inseparably welded together so man cannot be touched by one without being touched by all. Accordingly, the scripture states, “My voice is Spirit; my Spirit is truth; truth abideth and hath no end; and if it be in you it shall abound.” (D&C 88:66.) As noted already, that body which is filled with light—the power of God—can comprehend all things: truth.

 

For emphasis, let me say again that truth is the basis of glorification. Section 93 helps us understand why. In verse 30 we read, “All truth is independent in that sphere in which God has placed it, to act for itself, as all intelligence also; otherwise there is no existence.” The very essence of existence is the ability of truth and intelligence to act for themselves. But how can truth, which has been defined earlier as knowledge, act? It would be more comprehensible if the scripture stated that truth impels or causes righteous action. But that is not what this verse states. And what does the scripture mean by “all truth”? Is there more than one kind of truth?

 

Understanding comes from the latter part of verse 30, which states that “all intelligence” is free to act for itself. As noted above, intelligence is equated with the glory of God, i.e. light and truth. But intelligence is also equated with a specific primal substance. Verse 29 of section 93 states, “Intelligence, or the light of truth, was not created or made, neither indeed can be.” Fn Thus, intelligence has two scriptural definitions. One is an abstraction designated as “light and truth,” conveying the idea of mental acuity by which existence is cognized. The other is more concrete. It designates the primal substance of being, which is called “the light of truth.” The context of verse 30 suggests that intelligence should be understood in the latter sense. Thus, all intelligence, or the primal substance from which man is created, is free to act within the bounds in which God has placed it.

 

Intelligence, then, has two definitions. So may truth. The Lord says all truth is independent in the sphere in which he has placed it. If truth is the knowledge of the sum of existence then “all truth” would seem to define existence itself. Fn Thus, all existence (or all things that exist—that is, truth) has a measure of independence in which it is free to act. Of this totality, that portion designated as intelligence and associated expressly with man is also free to act. Because it is a portion of the whole of reality, it is designated as the spirit part of truth.

 

In sum, “all intelligence,” as I see it, identifies a component of the spirit aspect of existence. The phrase “all truth” defines the whole of that existence. The condition for glorification is cognition of that whole. Cognition comes only with obedience and the acquisition of light, which allows truth to follow as the capstone and seal. Thus, one is glorified in truth.

 

Note that God is the one who sets the bounds and conditions that make cognition possible. He has determined that man will be glorified only as he receives truth. But man can receive a fulness of truth only as he receives a fulness of light. Emphasizing this point are the verses that state: “Behold, here is the agency of man, and here is the condemnation of man; because that which was from the beginning is plainly manifest unto them [i.e., truth], and they receive not the light [or capacitating power]. And every man whose spirit receiveth not the light is under condemnation.” (D&C 93:31-32.) Intelligence is free to choose or reject light. When it willfully rejects light, it is rejecting truth, and condemnation follows.

 

Why Man Can Receive Light and Truth

 

Section 93 explains why man is capable of receiving a fulness of light and truth. The Savior states, “I was in the beginning with the Father.” (D&C 93:21.) “I am the Spirit of truth, and John bore record of me, saying: He received a fulness of truth, yea, even of all truth.” (D&C 93:26.) Because Christ is of God (I take this to mean that he was the literal Son of God and so was of the genus of the Gods), he had the ability to do what the race of the Gods do and that includes possessing all truth. One purpose of John’s record, as preserved in section 93, was to bear testimony that this potential was indeed realized in the Lord.

 

But the Savior was not the only descendant of the Gods. He tells us that he was but the firstborn of many brethren. (Romans 8:29.) Therefore, concerning mankind, he further explains, “Ye were also in the beginning with the Father; that which is Spirit, even the Spirit of truth.” (D&C 93:23.) Here we learn that as Christ was in the beginning with the Father so, too, was man. Further, both man and Christ are the Spirit of truth. They are, therefore, of the same genus, their primal nature being identical. Accordingly, what the Savior was able to realize is likewise within the potential of man. This is emphasized in the verses that state, “Verily I say unto you, I was in the beginning with the Father, and am the Firstborn; and all those who are begotten through me are the partakers of the glory of the same, and are the church of the Firstborn.” (D&C 93:21-22.) Man can receive glory, even the same glory as the Savior, because he is of the same origin and stock.

 

Christ As the Source of Light and Truth

 

But what is the process by which mortals receive the glory of Christ? The Savior has answered, “I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.” (John 14:6.) He here emphasizes that the only way is through him, and he explains the reason, stating that he will appoint nothing unto man “except it be by law, even as I and my Father ordained unto you, before the world was.” Going on, he states, “I am the Lord thy God; and I give unto you this commandment—that no man shall come unto the Father but by me or by my word, which is my law, saith the Lord.” (D&C 132:11-12.)

 

Here we see the central place that the word of Christ plays in the process of salvation. Man can only come to know God through the word of the Lord. But we have already seen that his “word” is equated with Spirit, light, and truth. Therefore, the reception of the word is the reception of light and truth. The Savior’s objective is to bring obedient souls to a fulness of glory. He knows how, for he followed the way set down by the Father. And if man receives glory, it will be in the same way through which Christ received it.

 

God’s glory consists in a fulness of light and truth. Christ was glorified as he, too, came to possess a fulness of light and truth. It did not happen all at once. Section 93 states: “I, John, saw that he received not of the fulness at the first, but received grace for grace;

 

“And he received not the fulness at the first, but continued from grace to grace, until he received a fulness.” (D&C 93:12-13.)

 

The Role of Grace

 

The role played by grace in the process through which the Lord received a fulness of the glory of the Father was twofold: he received grace for grace, and he went from grace to grace. But what does it mean to receive grace for grace and to go from grace to grace? The answer lies in the very nature of grace. The word denotes favor, kindness, and goodwill. Out of this comes the theological definition: “the free unmerited love and favor of God,” which brings divine assistance to his chosen ones. Fn The key expressions here are love and favor, and unmerited assistance. To receive grace for grace is to receive assistance on the condition of giving assistance. But not just any kind of assistance can be given. What transforms assistance into grace is the kindness and favor felt by the giver which is extended to the receiver, when such service is totally unmerited. But grace does not have to be given without condition. Indeed, an important aspect of the word is reciprocity. The scripture states specifically that man receives “grace for grace.” (D&C 93:20.) Thus, the extension of favor is meant to obligate the recipient so that he will extend the same. As he meets this condition, more grace is extended to him, which further obligates him to greater assistance of others.

 

Apparently, it was necessary for the Lord to grow through this process. In order to do so, he first received grace, or divine assistance, from the Father. This grace he extended to his brethren. As he did so he received even more grace. The process continued until he eventually received a fulness of the glory of the Father. The implication of this process is interesting: in a very real way Christ himself was saved by grace.

 

Such a concept sheds light on certain aspects of the Savior’s teachings. “The Father hath not left me alone,” he stated, “for I do always those things that please him.” (John 8:29.) Here he acknowledged the contingent relationship that existed between him and his Father. He was totally dependent upon the Father for power and knowledge. By doing God’s will, the Savior enjoyed communion with the Father through which God gave grace to the Son. This association anchored the Savior’s profound abilities to teach and to do. He insisted, “The Son can do nothing of himself,” but “the Father that dwelleth in me, he doeth the works.” (John 5:19; 14:10.) Thus, the grace of God was, of necessity, upon the Son. But note that it was truly grace, for the Atonement did not effect the Father’s salvation. Otherwise, any assistance God rendered could not be considered an act of grace but of necessity.

 

In a very real way, the Savior has the same relation to the Father as we have to Christ. He stated, “As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself, except it abide in the vine; no more can ye, except ye abide in me. I am the vine, ye are the branches: He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit: for without me ye can do nothing.” (John 15:4-5.)

 

These verses suggest another important aspect of grace, that of impartation. Whenever grace is extended, something is imparted. This imparting results in increased ability in the recipient. In the scriptures the reception of grace is expressed in two ways: a loss of the very propensity for sin and the accompanying ability to live God’s laws. Paul taught this concept, saying, “What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound? God forbid. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein? . . . For sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are not under the law, but under grace.” (Romans 6:1-2, 14.)

 

The Savior himself had to have power to live his Father’s law. According to Joseph Smith, “None ever were perfect but Jesus; and why was He perfect? Because He was the Son of God, and had the fullness of the Spirit, and greater power than any man.” Fn This power came through grace, even the grace of God.

 

Just what was imparted to Christ and, by inference, to man? Doctrine and Covenants 93 makes clear that it is light and truth. The possession of light and truth allows one to forsake the evil one and to be protected against his machinations. Further, light and truth enable their recipient to progress toward a fulness of the glory of God. This was the case with the Lord. Through his benevolence he received grace. Additional powers of light and truth were continually being extended to him such that he went from grace to grace. In other words, he went from one power level to another, from one capacity to a greater, until he received a fulness of the Father.

 

Receiving these life-giving principles of God allowed the Lord to become the spiritual Son of the Father. Fn John seems to have been communicating this idea when he stated, “And thus he was called the Son of God, because he received not of the fulness at the first.” (D&C 93:14; italics added.) The Father confirmed that sonship had been accomplished when he stated: “This is my beloved Son.” (D&C 93:15.) The fulness of sonship was contingent upon receiving the fulness of grace or, in other words, light and truth. The Savior did receive this fulness, and John testified, “He received a fulness of the glory of the Father; And he received all power, both in heaven and on earth, and the glory of the Father was with him, for he dwelt in him.” (D&C 93:16-17.) Thus, section 93 is clear about the way the Savior gained the glory of the Father. Since he is the way, the course he pursued must be the way all must follow. Section 93 is emphatic that this is the case. The Savior states, “I give unto you these sayings that you many understand . . . that you may come unto the Father in my name, and in due time receive of his fulness.

 

“For if you keep my commandments you shall receive of his fulness, and be glorified in me as I am in the Father; therefore, I say unto you, you shall receive grace for grace.” (D&C 93:19-20.)

 

Expressing the same thought, Joseph Smith stated, “You have got to learn how to be Gods yourselves, and to be kings and priests to God, the same as all Gods have done before you, namely, by going from one small degree to another, and from a small capacity to a great one; from grace to grace, from exaltation to exaltation, until you attain to the resurrection of the dead, and are able to dwell in everlasting burnings, and to sit in glory, as do those who sit enthroned in everlasting power.” Fn

 

Conclusion

 

An essential part of the glory of God is light, or living, life-giving energy. Light is a capacitating power through which man is given the faculty to receive truth. Possession of truth is the condition that must be met for glorification. A fulness of truth, or the knowledge of the sum of existence, requires the acquisition of the fulness of light. The grace of God plays a direct part in the reception of light and truth. Grace expresses itself through impartation. That which is imparted is light. The agency of man is expressed in choosing or rejecting light. But he is not free to choose or reject grace. Grace comes to all men freely, as it is the unmerited favor that God holds for all his children. Grace allows light to flow unto man. Thus, light, through grace, is freely manifest unto man. When man rejects light, he rejects God’s favor and cuts himself off from truth. Thus, he stands under condemnation. When he accepts grace by choosing light he is capacitated to receive truth. As he continues from grace to grace by giving grace for grace, he receives more light and truth until he is eventually glorified in truth.

 

 

(Susan Easton Black et al., Doctrines for Exaltation: The 1989 Sperry Symposium on the Doctrine and Covenants [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1989], 31.)

 

 

Moses asks God questions of what he saw, they were Why (Moses 1:39) and who (Moses 1:32-33) questions, not How questions (D&C 101:32-33).

 

Abraham 3-5 – Context of obedience, God gave laws and the earth obeyed through progression day by day, from unorganized matter to paradisiacal glory.  The creation was very organized and required obedience.

 

Abraham saw the stars of heaven, many were much larger then our own sun.  Kolob is a huge star near to where God lives; the greater the star the more powerful the force, there is organized structure.

 

 

This planet receives its power through the medium of others who transmit the power to others; and so it goes. What we have is a system here. We are not studying it now. We are just mentioning the fact that we do believe in the plurality of worlds and the Book of Abraham insists on it.

 

Notice in the third chapter verses three, four, five, six, seven, and nine, he repeats that you must always understand what you are seeing in terms of the earth on which thou standest, from where you view it. You don’t see things from above or with the eye of God that embraces all things at once. You have a limited point of view, and that’s going to restrict you. So throughout that third chapter, he says things like: “And I saw the stars, that they were very great, and that one of them was nearest unto the throne of God [there’s a multitude of beings, verse 2 ].” Then he says here, “I have set this one to govern all those which belong to the same order as that upon which thou standest [verse 3 ].” So Abraham lives on a particular order that belongs to a particular star. We know that the sun is a particular kind of star of a particular order. This is the order to which Abraham belongs, where he stands at present. This is where he is now, and he says everything has to be seen from that point of view. In the next verse you notice, after his manner of reckoning, a thousand years, according to the time of your order, “unto that [order] whereon thou standest [verse 4 ].” In the next verse he says, “The planet which is the lesser light, lesser than that which is to rule the day, even the night, is above or greater than that upon which thou[standest…[here is a planet greater than that upon which thou standest, verse 5].” Again this formula, “the earth upon which thou standest,” is used twice here. So it used seven times in this one chapter. It always specifies that all your reckonings and all your views and pictures of the universe are only what can be seen from the place where you are standing. And this, of course, is a very important principle today. It’s the anthropic principle. It has become absolutely basic in astronomy in the last ten years or so. It’s new and it’s extremely important. Seventh verse, “…reckoning of the time of the earth upon which thou standest.” Again, the ninth verse, “…Kolob is set nigh unto the throne of God to govern all those planets which belong to the same order as that upon which thou standest.” Notice, Kolob doesn’t govern all the planets in the universe, only those of the same order that concern Abraham. So he is shown Kolob for that purpose, because it concerns him. Then in eleven and twelve, “Thus I, Abraham, talked with the Lord face to face…and he told me of the works which his hands had made, And he said unto me: My son, my son (and his hand was stretched out), behold I will show you all these. And he put his hand upon mine eyes, and I saw those things which his hands had made, which were many [the same hand that had made all these things] and they multipled before mine eyes, and I could not see the end thereof.” We can make it very plain here what the situation is. Then in verse 13 it talks about Abraham’s local system: This is Shinehah, which means in Egyptian, one eternal round. Shenha means to go around forever. This is the sun, and that is what the Egyptians call it. “And he said unto me: Kokob…” That’s the Hebrew word for a star. It’s a very interesting word, the same as the Babylonian word and the Arabic word also, Kakkabum and Kawakibu “And he said unto me: Kokaubeam, [that which is the plural of Hebrew], which signifies stars, or all the great lights, which were in the firmament of heaven.” So here we are getting local systems and all the rest of it. Then we are told about the council in verses 21-28 of this same chapter where they get together and start making things. We are talking about plurality now, not about the creation.

 

 

(Hugh Nibley, Ancient Documents and the Pearl of Great Price, edited by Robert Smith and Robert Smythe [n.p., n.d.], 5.)

 

 

Abraham sees the universe as very orderly, smaller worlds obey the larger ones, obedience is key among the elements.

 

 

Abraham 3:22-25, 4:10 – Among the organized intelligence = noble and great spirits, there was obedience, some were more obedient then others, we prove ourselves worthy of blessings by our obedience.

 

God gave laws and the elements obeyed.  There is daily progression, the more laws are given the further obedience is followed.  We don’t grow unless we are obedient.

Alma 13:2-3

And those priests were ordained after the order of his Son, in a manner that thereby the people might know in what manner to look forward to his Son for redemption.

And this is the manner after which they were ordained–being called and prepared from the foundation of the world according to the foreknowledge of God, on account of their exceeding faith and good works; in the first place being left to choose good or evil; therefore they having chosen good, and exercising exceedingly great faith, are called with a holy calling, yea, with that holy calling which was prepared with, and according to, a preparatory redemption for such.

Joseph Fielding Smith Jr.                                                                           
The spirits of men had their free agency, some were greater than others, and from among them the Father called and foreordained his prophets and rulers. Jeremiah and Abraham were two of them. . . . The spirits of men were not equal. They may have had an equal start, and we know they were all innocent in the beginning; but the right of free agency which was given to them enabled some to outstrip others, and thus, through the eons of immortal existence, to become more intelligent, more faithful, for they were free to act for themselves, to think for themselves, to receive the truth or rebel against it.

The Lord declared through Moses the following: “Remember the days of old, consider the years of many generations: . . . When the Most High divided to the nations their inheritance, when he separated the sons of Adam, he set the bounds of the people according to the number of the children of Israel.”

A similar passage to this occurs in Acts where Paul declares to the Athenians that the Lord “hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times, before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation.”

These passages clearly indicate that the numbers of the children of Israel were known and the bounds of their habitation fixed, in the days of old when the Lord divided to the nations their inheritance. We conclude, therefore, that there must have been a division of the spirits of men in the spiritual world, and those who were appointed to be the children of Israel were separated and prepared for a special inheritance. [From Doctrines of Salvation, 1:59]

Harold B. Lee
From The Teachings of Harold B. Lee, p. 23
Between the extremes of the “noble and the great” spirits, whom God would make His rulers (see Abraham 3:22-23), and the disobedient and the rebellious, who were cast out with Satan, there were obviously many spirits with varying degrees of faithfulness. May we not assume from these teachings that the progress and development we made as spirits have brought privileges and blessings here according to our faithfulness in the spirit world? Now don’t be too hasty in your conclusions as to what conditions in mortality constitute the greater privileges. That condition in life which gives the greatest experience and opportunity for development is the one to be most desired and any one so privileged is most favored of God. . . .

Now, don’t misunderstand as to just what may be a great privilege or opportunity. Sometimes to be born through the channels of adversity is to have had the greatest opportunity. Just because we haven’t been born rich, for instance, may be the greatest blessing we could possibly have. Perhaps some physical infirmities might be a blessing.

God has perfect faith, His faith = power.  Light >>>> Truth >>>> Intelligence (D&C 93)

 

                                                                  Law >>>> Life >>>> Power (D&C 88)

 

Moses will receive revelation line upon line in order to free Israel.

 

God is supreme and independent from any other source.

 

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 76:92-95.)

 

92 And thus we saw the glory of the celestial, which excels in all things—where God, even the Father, reigns upon his throne forever and ever;

 

93 Before whose throne all things bow in humble reverence, and give him glory forever and ever.

 

94 They who dwell in his presence are the church of the Firstborn; and they see as they are seen, and know as they are known, having received of his fulness and of his grace;

 

95 And he makes them equal in power, and in might, and in dominion.

 

The Church of the Firstborn

Bruce Satterfield
Department of Religious Education,
Brigham Young UniversityIdaho

    Becoming part of the Church of the Firstborn should be the goal of every Latter-day Saint. Though the phrase “church of the Firstborn” is used in the scriptures (see Hebrews 12:23; D&C 76:54, 67, 71, 94, 102; 77:11; 78:21; 88:5; 93:22; 107:19), many in the Church are unfamiliar with its meaning. The following is an examination of the scriptures and the words of the brethren concerning the doctrine of the church of the Firstborn.

Three Kingdoms of Glory
    Just hours before the Savior performed the atoning sacrifice that ended in his death and resurrection, he told the Apostles, “In my Father’s house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you” (John 14:2). The atonement made possible salvation for God’s children in a one of several kingdoms prepared by the Savior. Brigham Young taught, “The kingdoms that God has prepared are innumerable. . . How may kingdoms there are has not been told to us” (Journal of Discourses 8:154).
    On February 16, 1832, the Lord gave to the Prophet Joseph Smith a series of visions revealing that the “many mansions” the Savior prepared for God’s children are divided into three general categories: the celestial, terrestrial, and telestial kingdoms (see D&C 76).

Celestial Kingdom: The Place of the Church of the Firstborn
    In the same revelation, Joseph Smith was told what one must do to qualify for entrance into the celestial kingdom:

    They are they who received the testimony of Jesus, and believed on his name and were baptized after the manner of his burial, being buried in the water in his name, and this according to the commandment which he has given--
    That by keeping the commandments they might be washed and cleansed from all their sins, and receive the Holy Spirit by the laying on of the hands of him who is ordained and sealed unto this power;
    And who overcome by faith, and are sealed by the Holy Spirit of promise, which the Father sheds forth upon all those who are just and true. (D&C 76:51-53).

Of those who qualify to enter the celestial kingdom, the Lord declared: “They are they who are the church of the Firstborn” (D&C 76:54).

Highest Level of Celestial Kingdom is the Church of the Firstborn
    But the phrase “church of the Firstborn” does not have reference to the celestial kingdom in general. In May, 1843, twelve years after the vision of the celestial kingdom found in D&C 76, the Prophet taught, “In the celestial glory there are three heavens or degrees” (D&C 131:1). Joseph Fielding Smith taught that only those who achieve the highest level of the celestial kingdom or exaltation are of the Church of the Firstborn: “Those who gain exaltation in the celestial kingdom are those who are members of the Church of the Firstborn; in other words, those who keep all the commandments of the Lord. There will be many who are members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints who shall never become members of the Church of the Firstborn. (Doctrines of Salvation, 2:41; emphasis added). Again, he said: “Eternal life is life in the presence of the Father and the Son. Those who receive it become members of the ‘Church of the Firstborn’ and are heirs as sons and daughters of God. They receive the fulness of blessings. They become like the Father and the Son and are joint-heirs with Jesus Christ” (Doctrines of Salvation, 2:9).
    Therefore, only those have been exalted are members of the Church of the Firstborn. Bruce R. McConkie taught: “as The Church of Jesus Christ is [God’s] earthly church, so The Church of the Firstborn is [God’s] heavenly church, albeit its members are limited to exalted beings, for whom the family unit continues and who gain an inheritance in the highest heaven of the celestial world” (The Promised Messiah, p.47).

Temple Ordinances Necessary to Enter Church of Firstborn
    The sacred ordinances performed in the temple are essential in becoming a member of the Church of the Firstborn. This was made clear by Joseph Smith. On May 4, 1842, the day the Prophet introduced the temple ordinances of the washing and anointing and the endowment in this dispensation, he wrote:

I spent the day in the upper part of the store . . . in council with General James Adams, of Springfield, Patriarch Hyrum Smith, Bishops Newel K. Whitney and George Miller, and President Brigham Young and Elders Heber C. Kimball and Willard Richards, instructing them in the principles and order of the Priesthood, attending to washings, anointings, endowments and the communication of keys pertaining to the Aaronic Priesthood, and so on to the highest order of the Melchizedek Priesthood, setting forth the order pertaining to the Ancient of Days, and all those plans and principles by which any one is enabled to secure the fullness of those blessing which have been prepared for the Church of the Firstborn, and come up and abide in the presence of the Eloheim in the eternal worlds. (History of the Church 5:1-2; Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p.237; emphasis added)

In line with this, Brigham Young who was in attendance on this occasion later stated: “The ordinances of the house of God are expressly for the Church of the Firstborn” (Discourses of Brigham Young, p.397; and Journal of Discourse, 8:154).
    Though D&C 76:51-53 (quoted earlier) does not specifically state that temple ordinances are necessary for entrance into the Church of the Firstborn, it is, however, implied in verse 53 which states that one of the prerequisites for those who qualify for the celestial kingdom are those “who overcome by faith.” In 1835, Joseph Smith taught the Quorum of the Twelve that temple ordinances were a necessary part of overcoming all things: “You need an endowment, brethren, in order that you may be prepared and able to overcome all things” (History of the Church, 2:309; Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p.91).
    Joseph Fielding Smith taught necessity of temple ordinances to become a member of the Church of the Firstborn in these terms:

The higher ordinances in the temple of God pertain to exaltation in the celestial kingdom. . . . In order to receive this blessing, one must keep the full law, must abide the law by which that kingdom is governed; for, “He who is not able to abide the law of a celestial kingdom cannot abide a celestial glory.” So being ordained an elder, or a high priest, or an apostle, or even President of the Church, is not the thing that brings the exaltation, but obedience to the laws and the ordinances and the covenants required of those who desire to become members of the Church of the Firstborn, as these are administered in the house of the Lord.

He then stated:

To become a member of the Church of the Firstborn, as I understand it, is to become one of the inner circle. We are all members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints by being baptized and confirmed, and there are many who seem to be content to remain such without obtaining the privileges of exaltation. (Doctrines of Salvation, 2:42).

Again, on another occasion, he wrote:

Each person baptized into the Church is under obligation to keep the commandments of the Lord. He is under covenant, for baptism is a “new and an everlasting covenant.” (D.C. 22:1.) When he has proved himself by a worthy life, having been faithful in all things required of him, then it is his privilege to receive other covenants and to take upon himself other obligations which will make of him an heir, and he will become a member of the “Church of the Firstborn.” (The Way to Perfection, p.208)

Finally, he taught:

The Lord has made it possible for us to become members of the Church of the Firstborn, by receiving the blessings of the house of the Lord and overcoming all things. Thus we become heirs, “priests and kings, who have received of his fulness, and of his glory,” who shall “dwell in the presence of God and his Christ forever and ever,” with full exaltation. Are such blessings worth having? (Doctrines of Salvation, 2:42-43)

Likewise, Bruce R. McConkie testified: “The temple ordinances open the door to gaining all power and all wisdom and all knowledge. Temple ordinances open up the way to membership in the Church of the Firstborn” (Conference Report, October 1955, p.13).

Temple Marriage Gate into Church of the Firstborn
    The temple ordinances of washing and anointing, endowment, and sealings are not isolated ordinances but are interrelated. The marriage ordinance is the culmination of all ordinances of the priesthood. Elder Boyd K. Packer has noted that all other ordinances of salvation “were preliminary and preparatory to your coming to the altar to be sealed as husband and wife for time and for all eternity (The Holy Temple, p. 69). As the culminating ordinance, temple marriage is gate into the highest level of the celestial kingdom and thus the gate into the Church of the Firstborn. Bruce R. McConkie has written:

The Church of the Firstborn is the church among exalted beings in the highest heaven of the celestial world. It is the church among those for whom the family unit continues in eternity. In a sense it is the inner circle within the Lord’s church on earth. It is composed of those who have entered into that patriarchal order which is called the new and everlasting covenant of marriage. As baptism admits repentant souls to membership in the earthly church, so celestial marriage opens the door to membership in the heavenly church. (A New Witness for the Articles of Faith, p.337)

On an earlier occasion, he stated:

We believe something more, as several of these brethren have said during this conference: that neither is the man without the woman nor the woman without the man in the Lord, but that the gate to exaltation and the fullness of eternal life in the kingdom of the Father is the new and everlasting covenant of marriage; and just as men may enter in at the gate of repentance and baptism, and work out for themselves a salvation hereafter by faith and diligence, so they may enter in at the gate of celestial marriage, and, conditioned upon keeping that covenant, come up in the resurrection as husband and wife, the family unit continuing through all eternity, and thus, eventually – as members of the family of God, members of the Church of the Firstborn – become joint heirs with Jesus Christ, and receive, inherit, and possess all things. (Conference Report, October 1954, p.125)

The Earthly Church Prepares People for Church of Firstborn
    The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints exists to prepare God’s children to enter the Church of the Firstborn. Elder McConkie wrote: “The purpose of the church on earth is to prepare us for an inheritance in the church in heaven” (A New Witness for the Articles of Faith, p.337).
    Hence the Lord stated that those who are ordained to the priesthood in the last days are “ordained unto the holy order of God, to administer the everlasting gospel; for they are they who are ordained out of every nation, kindred, tongue, and people, by the angels to whom is given power over the nations of the earth, to bring as many as will come to the church of the Firstborn” (D&C 77:11; emphasis added).

Blessings of the Church of the Firstborn
    Joseph Smith declared the blessings of those who enter the Church of the Firstborn in these words: “They who dwell in his presence are the church of the Firstborn; and they see as they are seen, and know as they are known, having received of his fulness and of his grace; And he makes them equal in power, and in might, and in dominion” (D&C 76:94-95). In other words, those who receive the highest level of the celestial kingdom become as God, exalted beings who are equal in power, might, and dominion with the Father. To them “the Father has given all things” even of “his fulness, and of his glory” (D&C 76:55-56). They “inherit thrones, kingdoms, principalities, and powers, dominions, all heights and depths” (D&C 132:19).
    Thus they become gods themselves. Having been made equal with God’s power, dominion, and authority, they do the work of gods: “to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life” of their own offspring.

Communication With Church of the Firstborn
    It is the privilege of those who have received temple ordinances and have been faithful in the covenants made therein to be able to communicate with the Church of the Firstborn. Concerning this, the Lord has said: “The power and authority of the higher, or Melchizedek Priesthood, is to hold the keys of all the spiritual blessings of the church–To have the privilege of receiving the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, to have the heavens opened unto them, to commune with the general assembly and church of the Firstborn, and to enjoy the communion and presence of God the Father, and Jesus the mediator of the new covenant” (D&C 107:18-19; emphasis added).
    How and when does this communication take place? This is one of the privileges of those who make their calling and election sure (though it is possible that certain circumstances may require that this communication take place prior to one’s calling and election is made sure- see Parley P. Pratt’s talk given at the laying of the cornerstones of the Salt Lake Temple on April 6, 1853 in Journal of Discourses, 2:43-47). In June of 1839, Joseph Smith taught the Church:

    After a person has faith in Christ, repents of his sins, and is baptized for the remission of his sins and receives the Holy Ghost, (by the laying on of hands), which is the first Comforter, then let him continue to humble himself before God, hungering and thirsting after righteousness, and living by every word of God, and the Lord will soon say unto him, Son, thou shalt be exalted.
    When the Lord has thoroughly proved him, and finds that the man is determined to serve Him at all hazards, then the man will find his calling and his election made sure, then it will be his privilege to receive the other Comforter . . .

He then stated:

    Now what is this other Comforter? It is no more nor less than the Lord Jesus Christ Himself; and this is the sum and substance of the whole matter; that when any man obtains this last Comforter, he will have the personage of Jesus Christ to attend him, or appear unto him from time to time, and even He will manifest the Father unto him, and they will take up their abode with him, and the visions of the heavens will be opened unto him, and the Lord will teach him face to face, and he may have a perfect knowledge of the mysteries of the Kingdom of God; and this is the state and place the ancient Saints arrived at when they had such glorious visions – Isaiah, Ezekiel, John upon the Isle of Patmos, St. Paul in the three heavens, and all the Saints who held communion with the general assembly and Church of the Firstborn. (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p.150).

    Such communication with the Church of the Firstborn is for personal edification and is not shared publically. Joseph Smith spoke of certain Biblical saints who had communicated with the “general assembly and church of the firstborn” (see Hebrews 12:22-23). He asked: “What did they learn by coming to the spirits of just men made perfect? Is it written? No. What they learned has not been and could not have been written” (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p.325)

(Doctrine and Covenants 88:107.)

 

107 And then shall the angels be crowned with the glory of his might, and the saints shall be filled with his glory, and receive their inheritance and be made equal with him.

 

 

All men and women, like Christ, are made in the image and likeness of God (Gen. 1:27; Pearl of Great Price, Moses 2:27), and so it is neither robbery nor heresy for the children of God to aspire to be like God (Matt. 5:48; Philip. 2:6) like any parent, our Heavenly Father would want his children to become and be all that he is. Godhood comes through overcoming the world through the Atonement of Christ (1 Jn. 5:4-5; Rev. 2:7,  11; D&C 76:51-60), becoming heirs of God and joint-heirs with the Savior, who is the natural Heir (Rom. 8:17; Gal. 4:7), and thus inheriting all things, just as Christ inherits all things (1 Cor. 3:21-23; Rev. 21:7; D&C 76:55,  95;  84:38; D&C 88:107 88:107). The faithful are received into the “church of the Firstborn” (Heb. 12:23; D&C 76:54,  67,  94;  93:22), meaning they inherit as though they were the firstborn. In that glorified state we will be conformed to the image of the Lord (Rom. 8:29; 1 Cor. 15:49; 2 Cor. 3:18; 1 Jn. 3:2; Book of Mormon, Alma 5:14), receive his glory, and be one with him and with the Father (John 17:21-23; Philip. 3:21).

(Robert L. Millet, The Mormon Faith: Understanding Restored Christianity [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1998], 194.)

 

 

(Revelation 3:21.)

 

21 To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down with my Father in his throne.

 

Christ will grant to the faithful the opportunity to sit with Him as He sits with the Father.  We need to live our lives His way fir this to happen.

 

 

1st Day of Creation – Light or power by which the earth can be organized over a progression of days.  Things are transformed over time; God is all knowing and all powerful.

 

The Father has turned the power over to the Son, which power can be called the Light of Christ.

 

Moses 1:33-34 – The first man is always called “Adam” Hebrew for mankind.  Worlds are created for man, don’t worry about other worlds, God will only tell Moses about this one.  Why?  Moses 1:39.

 

Moses chapter 1 – 4 important truths:

 

  1. Man is the offspring of God, (like a seed with all the attributes of the mother plant, needs light to grow and achieve its potential).  Man’s potential is to become like God.  Moses 1:4
  2. Gods work and glory is the immortality and eternal life of man.  Moses 1:39
  3. God is all powerful.  Moses 1:3
  4. God will never override our agency.  God has the power to save all men who believe and have faith in Christ and have a changed life.  Alma 12:15

 

Moses 1 – His Temple Endowment experience

 

1-8 – Moses with God and asks questions, Who and Why not How.

 

9-23 – Moses alone (weakness) confrontation with Satan

 

24-42 – Moses is with God again, witness to His glory, this is after he overcomes Satan

 

Moses is a representation of all of us. 

 

 

How do we receive the power of God, the power of faith?

 

The power of faith and the results of gospel living. There is perhaps no greater illustration in all of scripture regarding the power of simple faith in the word and ways of God than that of the brother of Jared. Here we see a man who acknowledged his fallen condition and his weakness before the Lord, who prayed for forgiveness, expressed his trust in and need for divine assistance, and watched as the veil was parted and the powers of heaven were made manifest (see Ether 3).

 

(Joseph Fielding McConkie and Robert L. Millet, Doctrinal Commentary on the Book of Mormon, 4 vols. [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1987-1992], 4: 291.)

 

 

THE POWER OF FAITH

 

President Marion G. Romney

 

“Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.” (Hebrews 11:1.)

 

“Being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ: by whom also we have access by faith into this grace wherein we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God.” (Romans 5:1-2.)

 

In his preface to the Book of Commandments, the Lord said that one of his purposes in giving Joseph Smith this revelation was “that faith also might increase in the earth.” (D&C 1:21.)

 

The Prophet Joseph Smith named “faith in the Lord Jesus Christ” as the first principle of the gospel.

 

Blessed is he who, based on a knowledge of the gospel, has unshakable faith in the Lord Jesus Christ. Such a one has for his goal the attainment of eternal life. He has an anchor to his soul, and a motive for action.

 

1. The possessor of such a faith has a sound understanding of the purpose of life.

 

He knows that God lives. He knows that he himself is a begotten child of God, and that as such he is endowed with the potential eventually to rise to the full stature of his Heavenly Father. And he is intimately acquainted with the plan by which he may do so. Thus fortified, he is not “driven with the wind and tossed” (James 1:6), but stands serene and confident amid the ups and downs of life. Like the Valley of Lemuel, he remains “firm and steadfast, and immovable” (1 Nephi 2:10), his goal fixed by his knowledge of the purpose of life.

 

61      The possessor of such faith has a sure test by which to distinguish truth from error.

 

He knows that he lives in a day of great conflict between good and evil; that anti-Christs stalk the earth in all lands; that false philosophies and doctrines emanating from the Prince of Darkness are being presented in such an appealing manner as almost to deceive the very elect. All this he knows and more.

 

He knows that earth was created to be a battleground for the souls of men; that this life is a testing time; that in mortality men must struggle between the two mighty forces of truth and error.

 

He is strengthened for the conflict by the knowledge that God, his Heavenly Father, has not abandoned him in the struggle, but has put within his reach the knowledge and wisdom upon which he can correctly distinguish good from evil. He knows that such knowledge has been revealed from heaven and that it may be found in the scriptures and in the teachings of the living prophets.

 

He knows this because he has studied and searched scriptures and has listened to and pondered what the living prophets say. He has also fasted and prayed about the teachings of the scriptures and living prophets. He knows from his own experience that faith comes from searching, hearing, pondering, and praying about the word of God. He knows that he himself has the gift of revelation by which he may not only correctly interpret the scriptures and the teachings of the living prophets, but also properly conduct his own personal affairs.

 

He is not led astray by false teachings, theories, and philosophies, for he tests them by his knowledge of revealed truth. If they do not comport therewith, he rejects them or at least holds them in abeyance until all the facts are in. His knowledge and faith enable him to distinguish between truth and error. The manner and importance of so doing we learn from Mormon, who said to the saints in his day:

 

“Take heed, my beloved brethren, that ye do not judge that which is evil to be of God, or that which is good and of God to be of the devil. . . .

 

“For behold, the Spirit of Christ is given to every man, that he may know good from evil; wherefore, I show unto you the way to judge; for every thing which inviteth to do good, and to persuade to believe in Christ, is sent forth by the power and gift of Christ; wherefore ye may know with a perfect knowledge it is of God.

 

“But whatsoever thing persuadeth men to do evil, and believe not in Christ, and deny him, and serve not God, then ye may know with a perfect knowledge it is of the devil; for after this manner doth the devil work.”

 

Then he adds this caution: “And now, my brethren, seeing that ye know the light by which ye may judge, which light is the light of Christ, see that ye do not judge wrongfully; for with that same judgment which ye judge ye shall also be judged.” (Moroni 7:14-18.)

 

3. The possessor of such faith is fortified in his courage to resist temptation and live true to his convictions.

 

Consider, for example, Joseph in Egypt. At the very pinnacle of success, when he was prosperous, popular, young, and romantic, he came upon a great temptation—a temptation that, had he yielded to it, would have ruined his life. His master’s wife became enamored with him and sought to seduce him. From the record it is clear that Joseph’s strength to resist this great temptation and live true to his convictions was derived from his faith, based upon a knowledge of what the Lord had said about adultery. For, said he, “How . . . can I do this great wickedness, and sin against God?” This weighing of Joseph’s temptation in terms of sinning against God was possible only because he was informed as to God’s commandments. And thus, he being fortified with knowledge and great faith, “It came to pass, as she spake to Joseph day by day, that he hearkened not unto her.” (Genesis 39:9-10.)

 

61      The possessor of a well-informed faith enjoys peace of mind in the days of trial.

 

There is no greater blessing. There comes a time in the life of every soul, be he ever so self-confident and well-adjusted, when without such an inner peace he sinks into the valley of despair.

 

For the comfort, encouragement, and guidance of the members of his infant Church, the Lord said in August 1830: “Listen to the voice of Jesus Christ, your Lord, your God, and your Redeemer, whose word is quick and powerful. . . .

 

“Lift up your hearts and rejoice, and gird up your loins, and take upon you my whole armor, that ye may be able to withstand the evil day, having done all, that ye may be able to stand.

 

“Stand, therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, having on the breastplate of righteousness, and your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace, which I have sent mine angels to commit unto you;

 

“Taking the shield of faith wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked;

 

“And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of my Spirit, which I will pour out upon you, and my word which I reveal unto you, and be agreed as touching all things whatsoever ye ask of me, and be faithful until I come, and ye shall be caught up, that where I am ye shall be also. Amen.” (D&C 27:1, 15-18.)

 

Great is the power of faith, and great are the rewards for faithfulness!

 

 

(Faith [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1983], 10.)

 

 

Moses 2 – The way God exercises His power or faith, it’s the way He works.

 

Moses 2:27 – Man is created in the image of God.  We are here to create offspring and have dominion (priesthood keys) over the earth.  Adam has the priesthood keys.

 

Moses 3:7 – (1) Adam was created (2) Garden was created (3) Trees created good & evil (4) Adam was given the command not to eat from it.

 

Moses 6:22 – Genealogy of the sons of Adam, He was the son of God, after the fall he then received the saving ordinances of the gospel of Jesus Christ and could be called again a son of God, see verse 68.

 

The Role of Helpmeet – equal, opposite, counterpart, like the wings of a plane, both are necessary and critical for the flight of the plane.

 

3:16 multiply thy sorrow . . . ; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children

 

Sorrow is used in Genesis 3:16 and 17 to translate the Hebrew ‘etzev, which connotes “toil, pain, travail.” Doubtless the burdens and pain of pregnancy and childbirth were thereby anticipated (Gen. 3:16b).

 

This is a great revelation to women. Eve and her daughters can become cocreators with God by preparing bodies for his spirit children to occupy on earth and later in eternity. Mothering would entail inconvenience, suffering, travail, and sorrow; these the Lord foretold as natural consequences and not as a curse. Satan had sinned and was justly cursed; but Eve had made a reasonable choice and was told some of the results of that choice. Later, she rejoiced when she learned about the ultimate results (Moses 5:11; 1 Tim. 2:15).

 

In mothering, nurturing, and caring for children, mothers (and women who adopt or otherwise give loving care to children) develop that most godlike virtue called mother love (Gen. 3:16a-e).

 

 

3:16 thy desire shall be to thy husband . . . rule over thee

 

In the Hebrew text there is often a depth of meaning not evident in the translated words. An intimate, loving, and righteous relationship is implied, but it must be fostered (Eph. 5:25-33; Col. 3:19-21; D&C 121:41-42).

 

3:17-19 cursed is the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat of it

 

As in Genesis 3:16, the Hebrew word translated sorrow connotes toil, pain, and travail (Gen. 3:17c). Woman would suffer one kind in her mothering functions, and man another—in sweat and toil, as provider and protector. The ground was cursed, but humankind was not; and the ground was cursed for their “sake,” so that humankind might learn good from evil by experiencing both. Thus the ground was cursed to bring forth opposites of all sorts, including weeds (thorns and thistles) rather than only the plants of Eden, which were all “pleasant to the sight, and good for food” (Gen. 2:9 and fn.).

 

3:19 till thou return unto the ground . . . , and unto dust shalt thou return

 

The inevitable separation of the spirit body from the mortal body of “dust” is sometimes symbolized by related Hebrew words such as adam (“mankind”), dam (“blood”), and adamah (“ground” or “dust”) in the scriptures (Gen. 3:19c-d).

 

3:20 Adam called his wife’s name Eve . . . the mother of all living

 

The Hebrew form of her name is Chavvah, related to chayyah, “life”; thus her name prophetically signifies her giving and sustaining life.

 

3:21 clothed them

 

The Lord clothed Adam and Eve with garments of skins (Gen. 3:21a) as coverings for their naked bodies. The Hebrew word translated coats is really the name of a garment worn next to the skin. Their garments would impress them with the sanctity of the body and protect it from abuses. Profane exhibition is now commonly used to entice people to actions having little to do with the primary and proper purposes and potential of these beautifully formed and marvelous bodies.

 

 

3:22-24 the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil

 

The truth that Satan had enticingly mixed with a falsehood was confirmed; by use of their agency, the man and woman did begin to “be as gods, knowing good and evil” (Gen. 3:5). But to prevent their choosing to return to the primeval “good” of an easy life in the Garden of Eden where perfect food was freely available, they were sent out of the garden, and the way to the “tree of life” was closed and guarded. As the Lord doubtless intended, humankind’s challenge to find ways to satisfy needs and alleviate discomforts has resulted in the development of much pure and applied science and art, ever since humankind was launched into this world of experience and enterprise.

 

3:24 Cherubims, and a flaming sword

 

Ever since the supernatural guardians were placed at the gateway to Eden, the entrances to holy places in many ancient cultures have been guarded by some form of cherubim (already a plural, without adding s). The meaning of the word cherub (singular) is not precisely known, but the ancient statues representing cherubim were usually composite creatures with parts from the bull, lion, eagle, and so on to symbolize superior powers (BD and TG, “Cherubim”).

 

The nature of the “flaming sword which turned every way” (Heb., lit., “gyrating flame of the sword”) has also not been revealed. Compare the supernatural phenomenon described in Ezekiel 1:4.

 

3:24 tree of life

 

The symbolic tree (Gen. 2:9c; commentary on Gen. 2:8-9, 15) had functions at the beginning and will again at the end of the earth’s program. References to it in the last book of the Bible are informative, and those in the Book of Mormon also broaden and deepen the meanings and concepts associated with that remarkable “tree.”

 

 

(Ellis T. Rasmussen, A Latter-day Saint Commentary on the Old Testament [Salt Lake City: Deseret, 1993], 17.)

 

 

Moses 3:18-22 – Man should not be alone, animals were created and Adam named each one, and woman was created symbolically from Adam’s rib, to be coequal with man.

 

Adam became a husband and Eve a wife.  They are leaving their Heavenly parents and cleaving to each other.

 

THE ORIGIN OF MAN

By The First Presidency of the Church
Messages of the First Presidency, 4:200-206

“God created man in his own image.”

Inquiries arise from time to time respecting the attitude of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints upon questions which, though not vital from a doctrinal standpoint, are closely connected with the fundamental principles of salvation. The latest inquiry of this kind that has reached us is in relation to the origin of man. It is believed that a statement of the position held by the Church upon this important subject will be timely and productive of good.

In presenting the statement that follows we are not conscious of putting forth anything essentially new; neither is it our desire so to do. Truth is what we wish to present, and truth – eternal truth – is fundamentally old. A restatement of the original attitude of the Church relative to this matter is all that will be attempted here. To tell the truth as God has revealed it, and commend it to the acceptance of those who need to conform their opinions thereto, is the sole purpose of this presentation.

“God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.” In these plain and pointed words the inspired author of the book of Genesis made known to the world the truth concerning the origin of the human family. Moses, the prophet-historian, “learned,” as we are told, “in all the wisdom of the Egyptians,” when making this important announcement, was not voicing a mere opinion, a theory derived from his researches into the occult lore of that ancient people. He was speaking as the mouthpiece of God, and his solemn declaration was for all time and for all people. No subsequent revelator of the truth has contradicted the great leader and lawgiver of Israel. All who have since spoken by divine authority upon this theme have confirmed his simple and sublime proclamation. Nor could it be otherwise. Truth has but one source, and all revelations from heaven are harmonious with each other. The omnipotent Creator, the maker of heaven and earth – had shown unto Moses everything pertaining to this planet, including the facts relating to man’s origin, and the authoritative pronouncement of that mighty prophet and seer to the house of Israel, and through Israel to the whole world, is couched in the simple clause: “God created man in his own image” (Genesis 1:27; Pearl of Great Price – Book of Moses, 1: 27-41.)

The creation was two-fold firstly spiritual, secondly temporal. This truth, also, Moses plainly taught much more plainly than it has come down to us in the imperfect translations of the Bible that are now in use. Therein the fact of a spiritual creation, antedating the temporal creation, is strongly implied, but the proof of it is not so clear and conclusive as in other records held by the Latter-day Saints to be of equal authority with the Jewish scriptures. The partial obscurity of the latter upon the point in question is owing, no doubt, to the loss of those “plain and precious” parts of sacred writ, which, as the Book of Mormon informs us, have been taken away from the Bible during its passage down the centuries (I Nephi 13:24-29). Some of these missing parts the Prophet Joseph Smith undertook to restore when he revised those scriptures by the spirit of revelation, the result being that more complete account of the creation which is found in the book of Moses, previously cited. Note the following passages:

And now, behold, I say unto you, that these are the generations of the heaven and of the earth, when they were created, in the day that I, the Lord God, made the heaven and the earth;

And every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every herb of the field before it grew.

For I, the Lord God, created all things of which I have spoken, spiritually, before they were naturally upon the face of the earth. For I, the Lord God, had not caused it to rain upon the face of the earth.

And I, the Lord God, had created all the children of men, and not yet a man to till the ground; for in heaven created I them, and there was not yet flesh upon the earth, neither in the water, neither in the air.

But, I, the Lord God, spake, and there went up a mist from the earth, and watered the whole face of the ground.

And I, the Lord God, formed man from the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul, the first flesh upon the earth, the first man also.

Nevertheless, all things were before created, but spiritually were they created and made, according to my word (Pearl of Great Price – Book of Moses, 3: 4-7. See also chapters 1 and 2, and compare with Genesis 1 and 2).

These two points being established, namely, the creation of man in the image of God, and the two-fold character of the creation, let us now inquire: What was the form of man, in the spirit and in the body, as originally created? In a general way the answer is given in the words chosen as the text of this treatise. “God created man in his own image.” It is more explicitly rendered in the Book of Mormon thus: “All men were created in the beginning after mine own image: (Ether 3:15). It is the Father who is speaking. If, therefore, we can ascertain the form of the “Father of spirits,” “The God of the spirits of all flesh,” we shall be able to discover the form of the original man.

Jesus Christ, the Son of God, is “the express image” of His Father’s person (Hebrews 1:3). He walked the earth as a human being, as a perfect man, and said, in answer to a question put to Him: “He that hath seen me hath seen the Father” (John 14:9). This alone ought to solve the problem to the satisfaction of every thoughtful, reverent mind. The conclusion is irresistible, that if the Son of God be the express image (that is, likeness) of His Father’s person, then His Father is in the form of man; for that was the form of the Son of God, not only during His mortal life, but before His mortal birth, and after His resurrection. It was in this form that the Father and the Son, as two personages, appeared to Joseph Smith, when, as a boy of fourteen years, he received his first vision. Then if God made man–the first man –in His own image and likeness, he must have made him like unto Christ, and consequently like unto men of Christ’s time and of the present day. That man was made in the image of Christ, is positively stated in the Book of Moses: “And I, God, said unto mine Only Begotten, which was with me from the beginning, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness; and it was so. * * * And I, God, created man in mine own image, in the image of mine Only Begotten created I him, male and female created I them” (2:26, 27).

The Father of Jesus is our Father also. Jesus Himself taught this truth, when He instructed His disciples how to pray: “Our Father which art in heaven,” etc. Jesus, however, is the firstborn among all the sons of God the first begotten in the spirit, and the only begotten in the flesh. He is our elder brother, and we, like Him, are in the image of God. All men and women are in the similitude of the universal Father and Mother, and are literally the sons and daughters of Deity.

“God created man in His own image.” This is just as true of the spirit as it is of the body, which is only the clothing of the spirit, its complement; the two together constituting the soul. The spirit of man is in the form of man, and the spirits of all creatures are in the likeness of their bodies. This was plainly taught by the Prophet Joseph Smith (Doctrine and Covenants, 77: 2).

Here is further evidence of the fact. More than seven hundred years before Moses was shown the things pertaining to this earth, another great prophet, known to us as the brother of Jared, was similarly favored by the Lord. He was even permitted to behold the spirit-body of the foreordained Savior, prior to His incarnation; and so like the body of a man was gazing upon a being of flesh and blood. He first saw the finger and then the entire body of the Lord – all in the spirit. The Book of Mormon says of this wonderful manifestation:

And it came to pass that when the brother of Jared had said these words, behold, the Lord stretched forth His hand and touched the stones one by one with His finger; and the veil was taken from off the eyes of the brother of Jared, and he saw the finger of the Lord; and it was as the finger of a man, like unto flesh and blood; and the brother of Jared fell down before the Lord, for he was struck with fear.

And the Lord saw that the brother of Jared had fallen to the earth; and the Lord said unto him, Arise, why hast thou fallen?

And he saith unto the Lord, I saw the finger of the Lord, and I feared lest he should smite me; for I knew not that the Lord had flesh and blood.

And the Lord said unto him, Because of thy faith thou hast seen that I shall take upon me flesh and blood; and never has man come before me with such exceeding faith as thou hast; for were it not so, ye could not have seen my finger. Sawest thou more than this?

And he answered, Nay, Lord, show thyself unto me.

And the Lord said unto him, Believest thou the words which I shall speak?

And he answered, Yea, Lord, I know that thou speakest the truth, for thou art a God of truth and canst not lie.

And when he had said these words, behold, the Lord showed himself unto him, and said, Because thou knowest these things ye are redeemed from the fall; therefore ye are brought back into my presence; therefore I show myself unto you.

Behold, I am He who was prepared from the foundation of the world to redeem my people. Behold, I am Jesus Christ, I am the Father and the Son. In me shall all mankind have light, and that eternally, even they who shall believe on my name; and they shall become my sons and my daughters.

And never have I shewed myself unto man whom I have created, for never hath man believed in me as thou hast. Seest thou that ye are created after mine own image?, Yea, even all men were created in the beginning after mine own image.

Behold, this body, which ye now behold, is the body of my spirit, and man have I created after the body of my spirit; and even as I appear unto thee to be in the spirit, will I appear unto my people in the flesh. (Ether 3:6-16.)

What more is needed to convince us that man, both in spirit and in body, is the image and likeness of God, and that God Himself is in the form of man?

When the divine Being whose spirit-body the brother of Jared beheld, took upon Him flesh and blood, He appeared as a man, having “body, parts and passions,” like other men, though vastly superior to all others, because He was God, even the Son of God, the Word made flesh: in Him “dwelt the fulness of the Godhead bodily.” And why should He not appear as a man? That was the form of His spirit, and it must needs have an appropriate covering, a suitable tabernacle. He came into the world as He had promised to come (III Nephi, 1: 13), taking an infant tabernacle, and developing it gradually to the fulness of His spirit stature. He came as man had been coming for ages, and as man has continued to come ever since. Jesus, however, as shown, was the only begotten of God in the flesh.

Adam, our progenitor, “the first man,” was, like Christ, a pre-existent spirit, and like Christ he took upon him an appropriate body, the body of a man, and so became a “living soul.” The doctrine of the pre-existence, -- revealed so plainly, particularly in latter days, pours a wonderful flood of light upon the otherwise mysterious problem of man’s origin. It shows that man, as a spirit, was begotten and born of heavenly parents, and reared to maturity in the eternal mansions of the Father, prior to coming upon the earth in a temporal body to undergo an experience in mortality. It teaches that all men existed in the spirit before any man existed in the flesh, and that all who have inhabited the earth since Adam have taken bodies and become souls in like manner.

It is held by some that Adam was not the first man upon this earth, and that the original human being was a development from lower orders of the animal creation. These, however, are the theories of men. The word of the Lord declares that Adam was “the first man of all men” (Moses 1:34), and we are therefore in duty bound to regard him as the primal parent of our race. It was shown to the brother of Jared that all men were created in the beginning after the image of God; and whether we take this to mean the spirit or the body, or both, it commits us to the same conclusion: Man began life as a human being, in the likeness of our heavenly Father.

True it is that the body of man enters upon its career as a tiny germ embryo, which becomes an infant, quickened at a certain stage by the spirit whose tabernacle it is, and the child, after being born, develops into a man. There is nothing in this, however, to indicate that the original man, the first of our race, began life as anything less than a man, or less than the human germ or embryo that becomes a man.

Man, by searching, cannot find out God. Never, unaided, will he discover the truth about the beginning of human life. The Lord must reveal Himself, or remain unrevealed; and the same is true of the facts relating to the origin of Adam’s race –God alone can reveal them. Some of these facts, however, are already known, and what has been made known it is our duty to receive and retain.

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, basing its belief on divine revelation, ancient and modern, proclaims man to be the direct and lineal offspring of Deity. God Himself is an exalted man, perfected, enthroned, and supreme. By His almighty power He organized the earth, and all that it contains, from spirit and element, which exist co-eternally with Himself. He formed every plant that grows, and every animal that breathes, each after its own kind, spiritually and temporally – “that which is spiritual being in the likeness of that which is temporal, and that which is temporal in the likeness of that which is spiritual.” He made the tadpole and the ape, the lion and the elephant but He did not make them in His own image, nor endow them with Godlike reason and intelligence. Nevertheless, the whole animal creation will be perfected and perpetuated in the Hereafter, each class in its “distinct order or sphere,” and will enjoy “eternal felicity.” That fact has been made plain in this dispensation (Doctrine and Covenants, 77: 3).

Man is the child of God, formed in the divine image and endowed with divine attributes, and even as the infant son of an earthly father and mother is capable in due time of becoming a man, so the undeveloped offspring of celestial parentage is capable, by experience through ages and aeons, of evolving into a God.

  JOSEPH F. SMITH,

JOHN R. WINDER,

ANTHON H. LUND,

First Presidency of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

Moses 4:5-13 – This is a simple account of the fall (figuratively), the mechanism by which mortality is introduced, this way agency is intact without God being held responsible.

 

The “Fall.” Biblical lore and ancient traditions among nearly all races of man, tell of the “fall” of the first parents from the grace of God. An event called the “fall” did occur, but it was a necessary part of the Great Plan. Adam and Eve were eternal beings, not under the ban of mortal death. Subject to death they must become, however, if their posterity should inherit corruptible bodies. The fall was a deliberate use of a law, by which Adam and Eve became mortal, and could beget mortal children. The exact nature of this event or the exact manner in which the law was used is not understood. The Bible account is, undoubtedly, only figurative. There was no essential sin in the “fall,” except that the violation of any law, whether deliberate or otherwise, is always followed by an effect. The “fall” of Adam and Eve was necessary, for without it there would have been no begetting on the earth of spirits with mortal bodies, and the Plan proposed and confirmed in the Great Council would have remained inoperative. “Adam fell that man might be.” Adam and Eve, in view of the great sacrifices they made to make the Great Plan a reality, are the great hero and heroine of human history.

(John A. Widtsoe, A Rational Theology [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1937], 51 – 52.)

 

 

 

The Mystery of Eden

 

Joseph Fielding McConkie

 

What of Eden? Was Eden real or just a universal myth-an allegory to explain the origin of man, an answer for the primitive mind? Was Adam molded from clay and Eve formed from Adam’s bone? Was there once a garden in which our first parents lived, blissfully unaware of their nakedness? And if so, what became of that garden when Adam and Eve were no longer there to dress and keep it? Did snakes once stand erect, possessing the power to converse with men and women? Was there once a tree, the fruit of which brought a knowledge of good and evil? Was there yet another tree, the fruit of which brought everlasting life?

 

What of Eden? Is the story figurative or literal? Is it reality or the shadow of reality, or is it a masterful blend of both? Is it like so much else within the Bible-a parable, a sealed book, a type, a story veiled to the eyes of the spiritually untutored? Is the story of Eden, in fact, a light that reveals the path all must travel to return to the divine presence? Just what is the mystery of Eden?

 

The confusion of tongues in the city of Babel is no match for the confusion of ideas and doctrines among Bible believers as to the meaning of Eden and the expulsion of Adam and Eve from its paradisiacal splendors. In unfolding that story we make no pretense to being smarter than others. Indeed, answers to spiritual queries have little to do with the powers of intellect alone, while they have much to do with eyes and ears endowed with a capacity to see and hear. Such is the privilege of those of the household of faith, those of believing blood, those who have schooled themselves in the revelations of the Restoration-the Book of Mormon, the Doctrine and Covenants, the book of Moses, and the temple ceremony. Such are the sources to which we turn to obtain an understanding of Eden and the experiences of those who once resided there. This article will confine itself to commentary on scriptural texts.

 

EDEN: FIGURATIVE OR LITERAL?

 

The scriptural account of the birth of Adam is a sacred metaphor, as is the account of the birth of his eternal companion, Eve. Indeed, it is Adam and the Lord who are quoted in the discourse by Enoch in which we are told that all mankind are born of the dust of the earth (see Moses 6:49-59). Thus the promise to Adam that in death his body would return to the dust from whence it was taken (Moses 4:25) is extended to all his posterity. “All are of the dust, and all turn to dust again” (Eccl. 3:20; see also Mosiah 2:25).

 

The imagery used to veil the account of Eve’s birth is most beautiful, particularly so in a day when there is so much confusion about the role of women. Symbolically, she was not taken from the bones of Adam’s head nor from the bones of his heel, for it is not the place of woman to be either above the man or beneath him. Her place is at his side, and so she is taken, in the figurative sense, from his rib-the bone that girds the side and rests closest to the heart. Thus we find Adam declaring: “This I know now is bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of man” (Moses 3:23). Eve, unlike the rest of God’s creations, was of Adam’s bone and of his flesh, meaning that she was equal to him in powers, faculties, and rights.

 

“Therefore,” the divine word attests, “shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife; and they shall be one flesh” (Moses 3:24). Thus, because Eve was of his flesh and of his bone-because she was his equal in creation and in divine endowment-Adam was to leave his father and his mother, as all men were to do after him, and cleave unto his wife and none else (see Matt. 19:5-6). All men and women are commanded to do likewise; that is, they (the newly formed couple), like their first earthly parents, are to be “one flesh”; they are to be as if they had one body, thus suggesting that they cannot properly have separate cares or concerns, different rights or varied privileges. The phrase also suggests that as Adam and Eve were in the image and likeness of their parents, so their posterity would be in their image and likeness.

 

How literally do we take the story of the Garden of Eden? This we know: Adam was real. He was as real as Christ. For if Adam was not real the Fall was not real; and if the Fall was not real the Atonement was not real; and if the Atonement was not real Jesus the Christ is not and was not necessary. Of some parts of the Eden story it matters little if we choose to view them as figurative or literal, but of others it is not so. The testimony of Christ, of necessity, embraces the testimony of Adam. Had there been no Eden there could be no Gethsemane; had there been no Eve there could be no Mary; if we have not inherited death from Adam, we have no claim on everlasting life through Christ.

 

What then became of Eden? This we know: it constituted sacred space when mother earth resided in her paradisiacal state, for it was here that Adam and Eve walked and talked with God, and it was from the confines of Eden that they were cast following their transgression. Further, we know that it existed after the Fall for a period of time and that God continued to instruct Adam and Eve from its sacred groves. (Moses 5:4;  6:4.) In likening Tyrus to Eden, Ezekiel made use of the term “mountain of God” (Ezek. 28:13-14), a phrase used throughout the scriptures to depict a place where one went to commune with God, to worship, to make sacrifices, and to enter into sacred covenants. Mountains were most suited for such purposes and thus became symbols for the temple, the place where heaven and earth meet. Perhaps Ezekiel was implying that Eden was a mountain or at least had a high place suited for worship.

 

As to what became of Eden, the scriptures are silent. Perhaps, after Adam and his righteous posterity had built the city of Adam-ondi-Ahman-which undoubtedly would have had a temple-Eden was no longer needed as a place of God’s presence. A place of sacrifice and of covenant, Eden thus could either be taken into heaven or be allowed to be assimilated into the earth.

 

What of the trees of Eden? Was there actually a tree whose fruit would make one wise, and another whose fruit would assure everlasting life? The scriptural account, for instance, tells us that the Lord planted “the tree of knowledge of good and evil” in the midst of the garden (Moses 3:9). He then gave Adam and Eve the command: “Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat, but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it, nevertheless, thou mayest choose for thyself, for it is given unto thee; but, remember that I forbid it, for in the day thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die” (Moses 3:16-17). “Again,” wrote Elder Bruce R. McConkie, “the account is speaking figuratively. What is meant by partaking of the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil is that our first parents complied with whatever laws were involved so that their bodies would change from their state of paradisiacal immortality to a state of natural mortality.”fn Elder McConkie also wrote elsewhere: “We do not know how the fall was accomplished any more than we know how the Lord caused the earth to come into being and to spin through the heavens in its paradisiacal state.”fn

 

If we were to reason that it was the fruit itself that brought about this change in the bodies of Adam and Eve, we would then have to suppose that our first parents fed some of the fruit to all the other living things upon the whole earth. Had they not done so, “all things which were created must have remained in the same state in which they were after they were created; and they must have remained forever, and had no end” (2 Ne. 2:22; see also Moses 3:9). Every plant and animal, including all sea life and the fowls of the air, would have been required to eat some of this fruit (and must also have been precluded from partaking of it either by design or accident before this point of time).

 

What of the serpent that beguiled Eve into partaking of the forbidden fruit? Did animals in Eden have the capacity to converse in the language of men, as some ancient traditions suggest? Was it then a natural thing for Eve to have a conversation with a serpent? And what of the curse which consigned the serpent to crawl upon its belly and eat of the dust of the earth? Does this suggest that snakes once stood upright, having legs and arms, as they are so commonly depicted in ancient Egyptian drawings? The key question is, Did Satan actually possess the body of a serpent and speak to Eve through that medium, or did Moses choose to describe Eve’s confrontation with the father of lies as a discussion with a snake because a snake is such a vivid metaphor to dramatize the subtle, crafty, and dangerous nature of the devil?

 

Whether a serpent was actually the agent of deception in the Eden story or merely a metaphorical representation of the devil, it matters little. Neither point of view changes or tampers with the integrity of the story. If, however, we assume the partaking of the fruit to have been a figurative representation of what actually brought about the transformation of the earth from a paradisiacal to a natural or mortal sphere, then it might follow that the speaking serpent would also have been figurative.

 

What, then, do we conclude of the Eden story? Was it figurative or literal? We answer by way of comparison. It, like the temple ceremony, combines a rich blend of both. Our temples are real, the priesthood is real, the covenants we enter into are real, and the blessings we are promised by obedience are real; yet the teaching device may be metaphorical. We are as actors on a stage. We role-play and imagine. We do not actually advance from one world to another in the temple, but rather are taught with figurative representations of what can and will be.

 

EDEN AS AN ALLEGORY

 

Should it ever be our privilege to call upon father Adam and ask him to share with us his treasured memories of Eden, can we not confidently suppose that he would speak in reverent terms of walking with God and being instructed by him? Would he not speak of hands that were laid upon his head to convey the priesthood and its keys? Would he not tell of his marriage with his beloved companion, Eve, and the charge given to them to multiply and fill the earth with their posterity? Would he not recount that instruction given him and his eternal companion by which they could obtain the fulness of heavenly knowledge and power? Would he not rehearse how he had been taught the law of sacrifice (Moses 5:1-8) and how he and Eve had been clothed in the garments of salvation preparatory to their entering the lone and dreary world, where they were to be tried and tested in all things?

 

A rehearsal of the key events of Eden brings the realization that we too are privileged to leave the lone and dreary world and enter the sacred sanctuaries of the Lord, where we participate in essentially the same experiences known to our first parents before the Fall. The temple is to us as Eden was to Adam and Eve. It is in the temple that we, like Adam and Eve, are invited to walk with God; it is in the temple that we are instructed in those things that we must do to return to his holy presence; it is in the temple that we are married for eternity and commanded to multiply and replenish the earth; it is within these sacred walls that we are taught the law of sacrifice, placed under covenant to be true and faithful, and clothed in a garment of protection.

 

After Adam and Eve had partaken of the forbidden fruit, but before they were expelled from the garden, the Father taught them the law of sacrifice. Animals were slain that Adam and Eve might be clothed in “coats of skins” (Moses 4:27) that were to be a protection to them in our fallen world. Adam and Eve subsequently learned that the shedding of the animals’ blood was in similitude of the atoning blood of Christ (Moses 5:7). Thus the garments given them in Eden were to serve as a constant reminder that through the atoning blood of Christ they could be protected from all the effects of a fallen world. Through his blood they could obtain a remission of sins, be born again, and return to the divine presence.

 

Adam and Eve were further instructed by an angel of the Lord that they were to take upon them the name of Christ and that all they did was to be done in his name (Moses 5:8). Thus as God had clothed them in coats or garments of skin as a token of the protection provided them through Christ, a protection from the effects of a fallen world, so they were to clothe themselves in his name by faith, and in that name they were to do all that they did that pertained to salvation or to things of the Spirit. Thus they were assured that they could overcome.

 

“He that hath an ear, let him hear,” John wrote unto the seven churches in Asia, “what the Spirit saith unto the churches; To him that overcometh will I give to eat of the tree of life” (Revelation 2:7). The fruit is the gospel of Jesus Christ and is described by Lehi as being “desirable to make one happy” and as filling the soul with “exceedingly great joy” (1 Ne. 8:10-12). To Nephi it was revealed that the tree of life-that tree which stood in the midst of Eden-represented the love of God, and by extension, the eternal life made possible by the atonement of the Son of God (see 1 Ne. 11:4-21).

 

EFFECTS OF THE FALL

 

After Adam and Eve had partaken of the forbidden fruit-thus becoming mortal and imposing mortality upon the earth and all forms of life-they were driven out of the Garden of Eden to till the earth, which is to say that the whole earth was destined to lose its paradisiacal splendor. The change of the earth from its incorruptible state to that of a fallen world is symbolized by Adam and Eve’s expulsion from the garden. The garden-earth that once was-became the lone, dreary, and often hostile earth that now is. The “cherubim and a flaming sword, which turned every way to protect the tree of life” (Moses 4:31), constituted a symbolic announcement that the earth could not return to its paradisiacal state while death reigned. Until the great millennial day, the earth would be subject to corruption.

 

As to the procreation that attends mortality, Lehi said: “They [Adam and Eve] have brought forth children; yea, even the family of all the earth” (2 Ne. 2:20). Eve is truly the mother of all living; every living soul on earth is a descendant of Adam and Eve. “God … hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth” (Acts 17:24-26). All of earth’s inhabitants share a common father.

 

The days of the children of men were prolonged, according to the will of God, that they might repent while in the flesh. The day within which their destined mortal death came was a thousand of our years (Abr. 3:4;  5:13). “Wherefore, their state became a state of probation, and their time was lengthened, according to the commandments which the Lord God gave unto the children of men. For he gave commandment that all men must repent; for he showed unto all men that they were lost, because of the transgression of their parents.” (2 Ne. 2:21.) The effects of the Fall pass upon all men; all must repent; all must be reconciled to God; all must be redeemed from death, hell, and endless torment.

 

“And now, behold, if Adam had not transgressed he would not have fallen, but he would have remained in the garden of Eden.” He would be there today, nearly six thousand years later, because there was no death before the Fall. “And all things which were created”-all things: the earth, all forms of life, vegetation, trees, grass, herbs, everything that comes from the ground; the fowl and fish and creeping things in all their varieties; animals of every sort; the field mouse and the dinosaur-“all things which were created must have remained in the same state in which they were after they were created”-that is, in a paradisiacal state-“and they must have remained forever, and had no end.” (2 Ne. 2:22.) There was no death –not for man, not for fowl, not for fish, not for animals, not for any form of life-until Adam fell.

 

“And they would have had no children; wherefore they would have remained in a state of innocence, having no joy, for they knew no misery; doing no good, for they knew no sin” (2 Ne. 2:23). Until Adam and Eve transgressed they were innocent. There was no righteousness because there was no wickedness; there was no good because there was no evil. Hence, as we have seen, Adam needed to transgress in order to be put on probation and be subject to sin, that he might reject sin, overcome, and embrace righteousness.

 

“But behold, all things have been done in the wisdom of him who knoweth all things.” Contrary to the beliefs of traditional Christianity, Adam conformed to the will of the Lord when he partook of the forbidden fruit. “Adam fell that men might be; and men are, that they might have joy.” (2 Ne. 2:24-25.) And joy is available only because of misery, its opposite. If there were no misery, which could not exist in the state of innocence before the Fall, there could be no joy. This is why Eve said that if she and Adam had not transgressed, they “never should have had seed, and never should have known good and evil, and the joy of [their] redemption, and the eternal life which God giveth unto all the obedient” (Moses 5:11).

 

As to the doctrine of the Fall, and the philosophical basis upon which it rests, Alma tells us that “our first parents” were cast out of Eden; that man became like God in the sense that he knew good from evil; that cherubim and a flaming sword kept the way of the tree of life; and that had fallen man partaken of the tree of life, he would have lived forever in his sins. “And thus we see, that there was a time granted unto man to repent, yea, a probationary time, a time to repent and serve God.” (Alma 42:2-4.) The creation of a mortal state of probation was the very reason for the Fall, and it was a state that could not come into being without the transgression of the first man and the first woman.

 

If, after the Fall, “Adam had put forth his hand immediately, and partaken of the tree of life, he would have lived forever, according to the word of God, having no space for repentance; yea, and also the word of God would have been void, and the great plan of salvation would have been frustrated” (Alma 42:5). Again we learn that Adam’s transgression brought probation, the necessity of repentance, the opportunities to do good, and the possibility of salvation. “But behold, it was appointed unto man to die-therefore, as they were cut off from the tree of life they should be cut off from the face of the earth –and man became lost forever, yea, they became fallen man” (Alma 42:6). Adam and Eve’s being cut off from the tree of life means they became mortal and would not continue to live without death. The mortal state, being lower than the immortal state, is thus a fallen state.

 

“And now, ye see by this that our first parents were cut off both temporally and spiritually from the presence of the Lord; and thus we see they became subjects to follow after their own will.” Temporal death is the natural death, the separation of body and spirit; spiritual death is to die as pertaining to the things of the Spirit, which are the things of righteousness. “Now behold, it was not expedient that man should be reclaimed from this temporal death, for that would destroy the great plan of happiness.” (Alma 42:7-8.) Death is essential to the plan of salvation. Only in death do we have hope of a glorious resurrection and of eternal life. Fulness of joy is available only when body and spirit are inseparably connected in immortality (see D&C 93:33-34).

 

“Therefore, as the soul [the spirit] could never die, and the fall had brought upon all mankind a spiritual death as well as a temporal, that is, they were cut off from the presence of the Lord, it was expedient that mankind should be reclaimed from this spiritual death.” Those who are reclaimed from spiritual death become alive to the things of righteousness and are thereby qualified to return to the presence of the Lord. “Therefore, as they had become carnal, sensual, and devilish, by nature, this probationary state became a state for them to prepare; it became a preparatory state.” (Alma 42:9-10.) And thus the foundation was laid and the need established for the great and eternal plan of redemption.

 

CONCLUSION

 

From Genesis to Revelation no story in scripture has been the source of more theological mischief than the story of Eden. It is the prime example of scriptural misuse and abuse. The errors that have come from the perversions of this story have given birth in turn to a thousand more. In no story have the figurative and the literal been so thoroughly confused, and in no other story has the absence of “plain and precious” parts caused more to stumble. In the mystery of Eden we have a classic case study of the dangers and difficulties with which uninspired scriptural exegesis is fraught, and the manner in which the scriptures remain a sealed book to all save those who know that same Spirit by which they were originally given.

 

Sexual desire is evil; infants are infected from the moment of conception with the stain of original sin; infants that die without baptism are everlastingly lost; our paradisiacal state was unnecessarily lost –each of these beliefs claims to be a fruit of Eden; each is bitter to the taste. Yet those who partook of Eden’s fruits declared them to be “most sweet” and to bring “great joy” (1 Ne. 8:11-12). Our promise is of fruits sweet above all that is sweet, white above all that is white, pure above all that is pure, fruits upon which we may feast until we know hunger and thirst no more (see Alma 32:42).

 

Indeed the story of Eden has remained a mystery. Too often the picture that is painted is that of Adam, bent and bowed in his new world of thorns and thistles, with the weak and gullible Eve dutifully following behind. Revealed religion exults in the Fall and rejoices in the blessings that flow from it (2 Ne. 2:25). The Adam we see is one who “blessed God and was filled, and began to prophesy concerning all the families of the earth, saying: Blessed be the name of God, for because of my transgression my eyes are opened, and in this life I shall have joy, and again in the flesh I shall see God. And Eve, his wife, heard all these things and was glad, saying: Were it not for our transgression we never should have had seed, and never should have known good and evil, and the joy of our redemption, and the eternal life which God giveth unto all the obedient. And Adam and Eve blessed the name of God, and they made all things known unto their sons and their daughters.” (Moses 5:10-12.)

 

In the story of man’s earthly origin we find the rich blend of figurative and literal that is so typical of the Bible, of the teachings of Christ, and of our daily experience-this that the story might unfold according to the faith and wisdom that we bring to it. Like all scriptural texts, its interpretation becomes a measure of our maturity and our spiritual integrity. Such is the mystery of Eden.

 

 

(Joseph Fielding McConkie and Robert L. Millet, eds., The Man Adam [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1990], 23.)

 

 

PARTAKING OF THE FORBIDDEN FRUIT

 

Let us back up for a moment and consider in more detail the nature of Adam and Eve’s offense in Eden. We have generally spoken of the task facing Adam and Eve as a choice between what appear to be competing commandments—the command to multiply and replenish the earth and the prohibition against partaking of the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil. We have usually tried to reconcile what seems to be a difficult situation by suggesting that such a dilemma required moral agency and thus shifted the burden for choice upon Adam and Eve. This is true enough. But let me suggest another approach to this matter. It seems that God was saying to our first parents: “Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely [that is, without consequence] eat, but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not [freely, not without consequence] eat of it, nevertheless, thou mayest choose for thyself, for it is given unto thee; but, remember that I forbid it, for in the day thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die” (Moses 3:17).

 

In other words, the only question to be decided by Adam and Eve was whether they desired to remain in the Garden of Eden. If they did—and there were certainly many things to recommend staying there—then they were not to partake of the forbidden fruit. For if they partook of the fruit, the Lord forbade them to stay in the garden. Or, as President Joseph Fielding Smith put it: “The Lord said to Adam, here is the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. If you want to stay here then you cannot eat of that fruit. If you want to stay here then I forbid you to eat it. But you may act for yourself and you may eat of it if you want to.” Fn

 

Truly the Latter-day Saints view the scenes in Eden with an optimism that is uncharacteristic of the Christian world. We believe that Adam and Eve went into the Garden of Eden to fall; that the Fall was God-ordained and God-intended; that it was as much a part of the foreordained plan of salvation as was the very atonement of Christ; and that the Fall “had a twofold direction—downward, yet forward. It brought man into the world and set his feet upon progression’s highway.” Fn “It was Eve,” Elder Dallin H. Oaks observed, “who first transgressed the limits of Eden in order to initiate the conditions of mortality. Her act, whatever its nature, was formally a transgression but eternally a glorious necessity to open the doorway toward eternal life. Adam showed his wisdom by doing the same.” Fn

 

We speak of our first parents’ actions in Eden as a transgression, and not as a sin (see Articles of Faith 1:2). Indeed, the Nephite prophets were consistent in their expressions that Adam’s act was a transgression (see 2 Nephi 2:22; 9:6; Mosiah 3:11; Alma 12:31). The Prophet Joseph Smith taught that “Adam did not commit sin in eating the fruits, for God had decreed that he should eat and fall.” Fn “Just why the Lord would say to Adam that he forbade him to partake of the fruit of that tree is not made clear in the Bible account,” President Joseph Fielding Smith stated, “but in the original as it comes to us in the book of Moses it is made definitely clear. It is that the Lord said to Adam that if he wished to remain as he was in the garden, then he was not to eat the fruit, but if he desired to eat it and partake of death he was at liberty to do so. So really it was not in the true sense a transgression of a divine commandment. Adam made the wise decision, in fact the only decision that he could make.” Fn Elder Oaks has also explained: “Some acts, like murder, are crimes because they are inherently wrong. Other acts, like operating without a license, are crimes only because they are legally prohibited. Under these distinctions, the act that produced the Fall was not a sin—inherently wrong—but a transgression—wrong because it was formally prohibited. These words [transgression and sin] are not always used to denote something different, but this distinction seems meaningful in the circumstances of the Fall.” Fn President Smith expressed his views on this matter as follows: “I am very, very grateful for Mother Eve. If I ever get to see her, I want to thank her for what she did and she did the most wonderful thing that ever happened in this world and that was to place herself where Adam had to do the same thing that she did or they would have been separated forever. . . . They had to partake of that fruit or you wouldn’t be here. I wouldn’t be here. No one would have been here except Adam and Eve; and they would have stayed there and been there today and been there forever. . . . Adam and Eve did the very thing they had to. I tell you, I take my hat off to Mother Eve.” Fn

 

LIMITATIONS ON OUR KNOWLEDGE

 

I seldom begin any discussion of the Creation or the Fall in one of my classes without setting forth at least three disclaimers:

 

1. Everything has not been revealed. All of the data are not in. Even with the inspired material in the books of Moses and Abraham and in the temple endowment, we are not yet in a position to answer all the questions that might arise from a discussion of these matters. Elder Bruce R. McConkie thus stated that “our knowledge about the Creation is limited. We do not know the how and why and when of all things. Our finite limitations are such that we could not comprehend them if they were revealed to us in all their glory, fulness, and perfection. What has been revealed is that portion of the Lord’s eternal word which we must believe and understand if we are to envision the truth about the Fall and the Atonement and thus become heirs of salvation.” Fn

 

2. We cannot always tell which items are literal and which are figurative. That is, we do not always know when the scriptures are giving us symbolic imagery or when they provide a record of literal events. We know, for example, that there was an Adam and an Eve, that there was a Garden of Eden, and that the Fall was an actual historical event. But what of the “rib story?” Was Eve really created from Adam’s rib, or is the scripture pointing to a greater doctrinal reality? And what of the trees in the garden and the fruit? Elder McConkie has written: “As to the fall, the scriptures set forth that there were in the Garden of Eden two trees. One was the tree of life, which figuratively refers to eternal life; the other was the tree of knowledge of good and evil, which figuratively refers to how and why and in what manner mortality and all that appertains to it came into being. . . . Eve partook without full understanding [see 1 Timothy 2:14]; Adam partook knowing that unless he did so, he and Eve could not have children and fulfill the commandment they had received to multiply and replenish the earth.” In short, to say that Adam and Eve partook of the forbidden fruit is to say that they “complied with whatever the law was that brought mortality into being.” Fn

 

61      We do not know how much Adam and Eve knew and understood prior to their fall. Like all of us, the knowledge of their premortal existence was veiled. In that sense, then, they were required, as are we, to walk by faith. But unlike us, they walked and talked with God, held immediate communion with him, and were taught by him. They lived for a time in a state of naive innocence, but at the same time Adam was appointed as lord or governor over the earth.

 

In one sense it is as important for us to know what we do not know as it is to know what we know. To argue or debate or quarrel over what the Lord has chosen to leave unclear for the time being is foolish and certainly unproductive. We know there was a Creation. We know there was a Fall. We know there was an Atonement. These are the three pillars of eternity. We do not, however, have a complete understanding of all the particulars of these three transcendent events. In regard to the Fall, it should be sufficient for us to know that Adam and Eve and all forms of life are required to partake of the fruits of mortality before we can partake of the fruits of immortality in the Resurrection. Further, men and women cannot partake of the fruit of the tree of life—that is, gain eternal life—while they remain in their sins; mortal man simply cannot inherit immortal glory. It is as though the Lord places cherubim and a flaming sword to guard the way of celestial glory so that we may surely understand that no unclean thing can enter his presence. Repentance and redemption always and forevermore precede exaltation.

 

Thus, as Alma taught, “if it were possible that our first parents could have gone forth and partaken of the tree of life they would have been forever miserable, having no preparatory state; and thus the plan of redemption would have been frustrated, and the word of God would have been void, taking none effect” (Alma 12:26). Or, in the words of Moroni: “Do ye suppose that ye shall dwell with [God] under a consciousness of your guilt? Do ye suppose that ye could be happy to dwell with that holy Being, when your souls are racked with a consciousness of guilt that ye have ever abused his laws? Behold,” he continues, “I say unto you that ye would be more miserable to dwell with a holy and just God, under a consciousness of your filthiness before him, that ye would to dwell with the damned souls in hell” (Mormon 9:3-4).

 

 

(Robert L. Millet, The Power of the Word: Saving Doctrines from the Book of Mormon [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1994], 67.)

 

 

 

 

The Fall and the Purpose of Mortality

 

 

 

Sons of Perdition are those who become apostates and are in open rebellion against God.

 

“Ye who are quickened [resurrected] by a portion of the celestial glory shall then receive of the same, even a fulness.
    “And they who are quickened [resurrected] by a portion of the terrestrial glory shall then receive of the same, even a fulness.
    “And also they who are quickened [resurrected] by a portion of the telestial glory shall then receive of the same, even a fulness.
    “And they who remain shall also be quickened [resurrected]; nevertheless, they shall return again to their own place, to enjoy that which they are willing to receive, because they were not willing to enjoy that which they might have received.”  (D&C 88:29-31)

 

Joseph Fielding Smith

      ALL SAVED EXCEPT SONS OF PERDITION. It is a very pleasing and consoling thing to know that the Lord will save all of his children, excepting the very few who willfully rebel against him. When his children have paid the penalty of their transgressions, they shall come forth from the clutches of the second death to receive a place somewhere in the great heavenly kingdoms, which are prepared for them with their several glories and degrees of salvation.

      It is the purpose of the Almighty to save all mankind, and all will enter into his kingdoms in some degree of glory, except sons of perdition who sin beyond the power of repentance and redemption, and therefore cannot receive forgiveness of sins. All the rest shall be saved, but not all with the same degree of glory or exaltation. Every man will be judged according to his works, his opportunities for receiving the truth, and the intent of his heart. (Doctrines of Salvation, 2:20-21)

 

      DIFFERENCES IN KIND OF RESURRECTED BODIES. In section 88 of the Doctrine and Covenants, we are taught that there is a difference in the kinds of resurrection. Some will be raised with celestial bodies; some with terrestrial bodies, and some with telestial bodies; and yet others will be raised with bodies without any qualification or power of glory, and these will be sons of perdition. (Doctrines of Salvation, 2:33)

 

      SONS OF PERDITION WILLFULLY REJECT ATONEMENT. With the Latter-day Saints, this is not so. While it is true we teach that a man must comply with these principles of the gospel in order to receive salvation and exaltation in the kingdom of heaven – which is proved by many passages of scripture – nevertheless, we hold out the hope that all may be saved, excepting the sons of perdition, a class that ractice rejects the atonement of the Savior, for the Lord intends to save all the workmanship of his hands, save these few who will not receive salvation. Our doctrine consigns none others to perdition, but holds forth the hope that all will eventually be saved in some degree of glory. (Doctrines of Salvation, 2:140)

 

      TWO CLASSES OF SONS OF PERDITION. The great punishment received by these rebellious spirits is that they are to remain without bodies eternally and are denied the redemption through the atonement of Jesus Christ. They are banished forever from the presence of God because they have lost the power of repentance, for they chose evil by choice after having had the light. While dwelling in the presence of God they knowingly entered into their rebellion. Their mission on earth is to attempt to destroy the souls of men and make them miserable as they themselves are miserable. These spirits are known as sons of perdition.

      There is another class of sons of perdition. This class is composed of all those who have known the power of God in this mortal life and then, having full knowledge of the power and purposes of God, rebel against him, putting Jesus Christ to open shame.

      The Lord has defined this class as follows: “Thus saith the Lord concerning all those who know my power, and have been made partakers thereof, and suffered themselves through the power of the devil to be overcome, and to deny the truth and defy my power – They are they who are the sons of perdition, of whom I say that it had been better for them never to have been born; For they are vessels of wrath, doomed to suffer the wrath of God, with the devil and his angels in eternity; Concerning whom I have said there is no forgiveness in this world nor in the world to come – Having denied the Holy Spirit after having received it, and having denied the Only Begotten Son of the Father, having crucified him unto themselves and put him to an open shame.

      “These are they who shall go away into the lake of fire and brimstone, with the devil and his angels – And the only ones on whom the second death shall have any power; Yea, verily, the only ones who shall not be redeemed in the due time of the Lord, after the sufferings of his wrath.”

 

      PUNISHMENT OF SONS OF PERDITION. The extent of this punishment none will ever know except those who partake of it. That it is the most severe punishment that can be meted out to man is apparent. Outer darkness is something which cannot be described, except that we know that it is to be placed beyond the benign and comforting influence of the Spirit of God – banished entirely from his presence.

      This extreme punishment will not be given to any but the sons of perdition. Even the wicked of the earth who never knew the power of God, after they have paid the price of their sinning – for they must suffer the excruciating torment which sin will bring – shall at last come forth from the prison house, repentant and willing to bow the knee and acknowledge Christ, to receive some influence of the Spirit of God in the telestial kingdom.

      “For they shall be judged according to their works, and every man shall receive according to his own works, his own dominion, in the mansions which are prepared; And they shall be servants of the Most High; but where God and Christ dwell they cannot come, worlds without end.”

      With the sons of perdition, however, even this blessing is denied. They have willfully made themselves servants of Satan and servants to him shall they remain forever. They place themselves beyond the power of repentance and beyond the mercies of God. (Doctrines of Salvation, 2:219-221)

 

Spencer W. Kimball

      Those who followed Lucifer in his rebellion in the premortal life and those who in mortality sin against the Holy Ghost are sons of perdition. The ex-mortal sons of perdition will be resurrected, as will everyone else; but they will finally suffer the second death, the spiritual death, for “they are cut off again as to things pertaining to righteousness.” (Hel. 14:18.)

      In the days of the restoration there apparently were those who taught that the devil and his angels and the sons of perdition should sometime be restored. The Prophet Joseph Smith would not countenance the teaching of this doctrine, and sanctioned the decision of the bishop that any who taught it should be barred from communion.

      In the realms of perdition or the kingdom of darkness, where there is no light, Satan and the unembodied spirits of the pre-existence shall dwell together with those of mortality who retrogress to the level of perdition. These have lost the power of regeneration. They have sunk so low as to have lost the inclinations and ability to repent, consequently the gospel plan is useless to them as an agent of growth and development.

      [Quotes D&C 88:24]

      [Quotes D&C 76:31-38]

      The Prophet Joseph Smith gives us this further picture:

      “. . . Those who commit the unpardonable sin are doomed to Gnolom to dwell in hell, worlds without end. As they concocted scenes of bloodshed in this world, so they shall rise to that resurrection which is as the lake of fire and brimstone. Some shall rise to the everlasting burnings of God; for God dwells in everlasting burnings and some shall rise to the damnation of their own filthiness, which is as exquisite a torment as the lake of fire and brimstone.”

      Speculation as to individual sons of perdition is at best unprofitable. Some have consigned Judas Iscariot to this doom, based on certain scriptural passages. (See John 12:6; 6:70; 17:12; Acts 1:20.) President Joseph F. Smith questions this interpretation:

      “To my mind it strongly appears that not one of the disciples possessed sufficient light, knowledge nor wisdom, at the time of the crucifixion, for either exaltation or condemnation; for it was afterward that their minds were opened to understand the scriptures, and that they were endowed with power from on high; without which they were only children in knowledge, in comparison to what they afterwards became under the influence of the Spirit.” (The Miracle of Forgiveness, pp.125-127)

 

 

Patriarchal order goes through 1 line for the keys of the priesthood.  Adam’s son Abel received the keys; Cain would not listen to Abel.  Abel was in charge of the temple, the sacrifice; he also was in charge of the sheep used for sacrifice, Moses 5:20, 26.

 

“Before the Lord” = Old Testament phraseology meaning the temple.

 

Seth takes the place of Abel, the priesthood line continues through Seth.

 

 

The Sons of Adam

 

The account of Cain and Abel’s offerings in Genesis 4 is brought to life and given a doctrinal context by the Prophet’s inspired translation. We learn that God had commanded Adam, Eve, and their posterity to “offer the firstlings of their flocks” as an offering, “in similitude of the sacrifice of the Only Begotten of the Father” (Moses 5:5-7). Cain, one who “loved Satan more than God,” turned away from his parents’ teachings and entered into league with the father of lies. At Satan’s urging, and in what seems to be a defiance of the command to offer a blood sacrifice,11 Cain “brought of the fruit of the ground an offering unto the Lord.” On the other hand, Abel “hearkened unto the voice of the Lord” and “brought of the firstlings of his flock.” The Lord “had respect unto Abel, and to his offering; but unto Cain, and to his offering, he had not respect.” Cain then entered into an unholy alliance with Satan, plotted and carried out the death of his brother Abel, and instigated secret combinations in the land (Moses 5:18-51).

 

The Prophet Joseph explained that by faith in the atonement of Christ and the plan of redemption, “Abel offered to God a sacrifice that was accepted, which was the firstlings of the flock. Cain offered of the fruit of the ground, and was not accepted, because he could not do it in faith, he could have no faith, or could not exercise faith contrary to the plan of heaven. It must be shedding the blood of the Only Begotten to atone for man; for this was the plan of redemption; and without the shedding of blood was no remission [see Hebrews 9:22]; and as the sacrifice was instituted for a type, by which man was to discern the great Sacrifice which God had prepared; to offer a sacrifice contrary to that, no faith could be exercised, because redemption was not purchased in that way, nor the power of atonement instituted after that order; consequently Cain could have no faith; and whatsoever is not of faith, is sin.” The Prophet went on to say that however varied may be the opinions of the learned “respecting the conduct of Abel, and the knowledge which he had on the subject of atonement, it is evident in our minds, that he was instructed more fully in the plan than what the Bible speaks of. . . .

 

“ . . . How could Abel offer a sacrifice and look forward with faith on the Son of God for a remission of his sins, and not understand the Gospel?” Now note what the Prophet asks: “And if Abel was taught of the coming of the Son of God, was he not taught also of His ordinances? We all admit that the Gospel has ordinances, and if so, had it not always ordinances, and were not its ordinances always the same?”12

 

 Further, Brother Joseph stated that God had “set the ordinances to be the same forever and ever, and set Adam to watch over them, to reveal them from heaven to man, or to send angels to reveal them.” That Adam “received revelations, commandments and ordinances at the beginning is beyond the power of controversy; else how did they begin to offer sacrifices to God in an acceptable manner? And if they offered sacrifices they must be authorized by ordination.” The Prophet then quoted from the Apostle Paul: “’By faith Abel offered unto God a more excellent sacrifice than Cain, by which he obtained witness that he was righteous, God testifying of his gifts; and by it he being dead, yet speaketh’ (Hebrews 11:4). How doth he yet speak?” Joseph asked. “Why he magnified the Priesthood which was conferred upon him, and died a righteous man, and therefore has become an angel of God by receiving his body from the dead, holding still the keys of his dispensation; and was sent down from heaven unto Paul to minister consoling words, and to commit unto him a knowledge of the mysteries of godliness.”

 

And then, as a type of summary on these matters, the Prophet spoke concerning Cain and Abel: “The power, glory and blessings of the Priesthood could not continue with those who received ordination only as their righteousness continued; for Cain also being authorized to offer sacrifice, but not offering it in righteousness, was cursed. It signifies, then, that the ordinances must be kept in the very way God has appointed; otherwise their Priesthood will prove a cursing instead of a blessing.”13

 

We know little concerning the keys of Abel’s dispensation, spoken of above, except for the fact that a modern revelation indicates that one line of the priesthood descended “from Noah till Enoch, through the lineage of their fathers; and from Enoch to Abel, who was slain by the conspiracy of his brother, who received the priesthood by the commandments of God, by the hand of his father Adam, who was the first man” (D&C 84:15-16; emphasis added). With the murder of Abel and the defection of Cain to perdition, God provided another son for Adam and Eve through which the blessings of the evangelical priesthood or patriarchal order would continue. Seth was “ordained by Adam at the age of sixty-nine years, and was blessed by him three years previous to his (Adam’s) death, and received the promise of God by his father, that his posterity should be the chosen of the Lord, and that they should be preserved unto the end of the earth; because he (Seth) was a perfect man, and his likeness was the express likeness of his father, insomuch that he seemed to be like unto his father in all things, and could be distinguished from him only by his age” (D&C 107:39-43; see also Moses 6:10-11).

 

 

(Robert L. Millet, Selected Writings of Robert L. Millet: Gospel Scholars Series [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 2000], 30.)

 

Life’s circumstances brings out our true motives, do good things for different motives, some are better more pure than others.

 

Moses 5:23 – The Lord commands Cain to make right choices or Satan will have him.

 

Adam Patriarchal order to Abel then to Seth, D&C 84:16 and D&C 107:41-43.

 

 

Doctrine and Covenants 84:16

 

Why is the priesthood lineage here traced through Abel rather than through Seth as it is in Doctrine and Covenants 107:41-43?

 

Doctrine and Covenants 84 affirms that Moses’ priesthood could be traced back to Adam. Verses 15-16 do not mention each individual in the early part of this priesthood line but simply testify that the priesthood was passed down “through the lineage of their fathers.” Doctrine and Covenants 107 serves a different purpose, emphasizing that the office of patriarch was to be passed down from father to son. Because Abel had been killed, Seth was the person who actually ordained his fifth great-grandson, Lamech. That may explain why Seth, rather than Abel, is named in this priesthood lineage.

 

 

(Richard O. Cowan, Answers to Your Questions About the Doctrine and Covenants [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1996], 97.)

 

 

Establishment of the Church of the Lamb        versus      Establishment of the Church of the Devil

 

                                                                                           (With Cain as Ruler)

 

 

Selected Quotes Concerning

The Purpose of Mortality
_________________________

General Statements

D&C 101:32-33
    Yea, verily I say unto you, in that day when the Lord shall come, he shall reveal all things–Things which have passed, and hidden things which no man knew, things of the earth, by which it was made, and the purpose and the end thereof

George Q. Cannon
    God has placed us here upon the earth to accomplish important purposes. These purposes have been in part revealed unto us. Probably it is not possible for men and women in this mortal state of existence to comprehend all the designs of God connected with man’s existence upon the earth; but much has been revealed upon this subject to us as a people. (Gospel Truth, 1:11)

Ezra Taft Benson
    Life has a fourfold purpose. First of all, we come to this mortal life to receive a physical, mortal body. Without a physical body man is limited in his progression and only with a spirit and a body united together permanently can man receive a fulness of joy; so we are living today part of eternity. We accepted that plan in the spirit world before we came here, and we rejoiced at the opportunity of coming here.

    Second, we can here to gain experience–experience with a physical, mortal world.

    The third purpose of life is to give us an opportunity to prove ourselves (Abraham 3:25). To prove that even in the presence of evil and sin we can live a good life. To prove that in spite of temptation that we have the strength and the character to adhere to the principles of the gospel.

    And fourth, this life is intended to provide an opportunity to help our Father in Heaven with His great plan, and we do that through honorable parenthood. We cooperate with our Heavenly Father in helping to prepare tabernacles to house spirits of His children. So the matter of marriage, the home, and the family is a vital part of the plan of our Heavenly Father, and by keeping this fourfold purpose of life in mind constantly and carrying out these purposes to have a fulness of joy in mortal life, and we prepare ourselves for exaltation in the celestial kingdom where we will receive a fulness of joy. So the whole purpose of the Church is to help and assist us in carrying out these purposes in life. (The Teachings of Ezra Taft Benson, pp. 27-28)

Receive a Body

Joseph Smith
    We came to this earth that we might have a body and present it pure before God in the celestial kingdom. The great principle of happiness consists in having a body. The devil has no body, and herein is his punishment. He is pleased when he can obtain the tabernacle of man, and when cast out by the Savior he asked to go into the herd of swine, showing that he would prefer a swine’s body to having none. (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p.181)

Brigham Young
    It is the wish of our Heavenly Father to bring all his children back into his presence. The spirits of all the human family dwelt with him before they took tabernacles of flesh and became subject to the fall and to sin. He is their spiritual Father, and has sent them here to be clothed with flesh, and to be subject, with their tabernacles, to the ills that afflict fallen humanity. When they have proved themselves faithful in all things, and worthy before Him, they can then have the privilege of returning again to his presence, with their bodies, to dwell in the abodes of the blessed. If man could have been made perfect, in his double capacity of body and spirit, without passing through the ordeals of mortality, there would have been no necessity of our coming into this state of trial and suffering. Could the Lord have glorified his children in spirit, without a body like his own, he no doubt would have done so. (Journal of Discourses, 11:42-43)

Orson F. Whitney
    Man needed experience in the midst of mortal conditions, in order to acquire the education that would fit him for spheres beyond. First, however, he needed a body, for purposes of increase and progression, both in time and in eternity. The spirit without the body is incomplete; it cannot propagate, it cannot go on to glory. . . It is a reasonable inference that spirits advance as far as they can before they are given earthly bodies. Having received these bodies, they are in a position, by means of the Gospel and the powers of the Priesthood, to make further progress toward perfection. (Cowley and Whitney on Doctrine, p. 283)

Joseph Fielding Smith
    The importance of these mortal tabernacles is apparent from the knowledge we have of eternal life. Spirits cannot be made perfect without a body of flesh and bones. This body and its spirit are brought to immortality and blessings of salvation through the resurrection. After the resurrection there can be no separation again; body and spirit become inseparably connected that man may receive a fullness of joy. In no other way, other than through birth into this life and the resurrection, can spirits become like our Eternal Father. (Conference Report, Oct. 1965, p. 28)

Spencer W. Kimball
    One definite purpose of our spirits coming to this earth and assuming the mortal state was to obtain a physical body. This body was to be subject to all the weaknesses, temptations, frailties and limitations of mortality, and was to face the challenge to overcome self. (The Miracle of Forgiveness, p.5).
 

To Gain Experience Through the Knowledge of Good and Evil

James E. Talmage
    A knowledge of good and evil is essential to the advancement that God has made possible for His children to achieve; and this knowledge can be best gained by actual experience, with the contrasts of good and its opposite plainly discernible. Therefore has man been placed upon earth subject to the influence of good and wicked powers, with a knowledge of the conditions surrounding him, and the heaven-born right to choose for himself. (Articles of Faith, p.53-54)
    A knowledge of good and evil is essential to progress, and the school of experience in mortality has been provided for the acquirement of such knowledge. (Articles of Faith, p. 54).

Howard W. Hunter
    There is purpose in man’s sojourn in mortality. He is placed here for a definite reason, in accordance with God’s great plan. We read in Genesis the story of the creation: “And the Lord God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil. . . .” (Gen. 3:22 [Genesis 3:22].)
    To learn the difference between good and evil is one of the great purposes for man to have mortal life, yet he is given his freedom of choice with the promise of eternal blessings if he obeys the laws of God. (Conference Report, Oct. 1969, p.112)

George Q. Cannon
    They [Adam and Eve] had a knowledge of good and evil just as the Gods have. They became as Gods; for that is one of the features, one of the peculiar attributes of those who attain unto that glory–they understand the difference between good and evil. In our pre-existent state, in our spiritual existence, I do not know how extensive our knowledge of good and evil was. That is not fully revealed. But this I do know, that when we come to earth and become clothed with mortality we do arrive at a knowledge of good and evil, and that knowledge prepares us for that future existence which we will have in the eternal worlds; it will enable us to enter upon a career that is never ending, that will continue onward and upward throughout all the ages of eternity. It is for this purpose that we are here. God has given unto us this probation for the express purpose of obtaining a knowledge of good and evil–of understanding evil and being able to overcome the evil–and by overcoming it receive the exaltation and glory that He has in store for us. (Journal of Discourses, 26:190-191)

Joseph F. Smith, Anthon H. Lund, Charles W. Penrose, First Presidency of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
    God, doubtless, could avert war, prevent crime, destroy poverty, chase away darkness, overcome error, and make all things bright, beautiful and joyful. But this would involve the destruction of a vital and fundamental attribute in man – the right of agency. It is for the benefit of His sons and daughters that they become acquainted with evil as well as good, with darkness as well as light, with error as well as truth, and with the results of the infraction of eternal laws. Therefore he has permitted the evils which have been brought about by the acts of His creatures, but will control their ultimate results for His own glory and the progress and exaltation of His sons and daughters, when they have learned obedience by the things they suffer. The contrasts experienced in this world of mingled sorrow and joy are educational in their nature, and will be the means of raising humanity to a full appreciation of all that is right and true and good. The foreknowledge of God does not imply His action in bringing about that which He foresees, nor make Him responsible in any degree for that which man does or refuses to do. The comprehension of this principle makes clear many questions that puzzle the uninformed as to the works and power of Deity. (Messages of the First Presidency, 4:325-326)

Brigham Young
    The reason of our being made subject to sin and misery, pain, woe, and death, is, that we may become acquainted with the opposites of happiness and pleasure. The absence of light brings darkness, and darkness an appreciation of light; pain an appreciation of ease and comfort; and ignorance, falsehood, folly, and sin, in comparison with wisdom, knowledge, righteousness, and truth, make the latter the more desirable to mankind. Facts are made apparent to the human mind by their opposites. We find ourselves surrounded in this mortality by an almost endless combination of opposites, through which we must pass to gain experience and information to fit us for an eternal progression. (Journal of Discourses, 11:42-43)
    If the Scriptures are true, it proves that sin is in the world, and the question arises, Is it necessary that sin should be here? What will the Latter-day Saints say? Is it necessary that we should know good from evil? I can answer this to suit myself by saying it is absolutely necessary, for the simple reason that if we had never realized darkness we never could have comprehended the light; if we never tasted anything bitter, but were to eat sweets, the honey and the honeycomb, from the time we come into this world until the time we go out of it, what knowledge could we have of the bitter? This leads me to the decision that every fact that exists in this world is demonstrated by its opposite. If this is the fact–and all true philosophy proves it–it leads me to the conclusion that the transgression of our first parents was absolutely necessary, that we might be brought in contact with sin and have the opportunity of knowing good and evil. (Journal of Discourses 14:70-71)

Orson Pratt
    We will bring up an example. For instance, suppose you had never tasted anything that was sweet–never had the sensation of sweetness–could you have any correct idea of the term sweetness? No. On the other hand, how could you understand bitter if you never had tasted bitterness? Could you define the term to them who had experienced this sensation, or knew it? No. I will bring another example. Take a man who had been perfectly blind from his infancy, and never saw the least gleam of light–could you describe colors to him? No. Would he know anything about red, blue, violet, or yellow? No; you could not describe it to him by any way you might undertake. But by some process let his eyes be opened, and let him gaze upon the sun beams that reflect upon a watery cloud, producing the rainbow, where he would see a variety of colors, he could then appreciate them for himself; but tell him about colors when he is blind, he would not know them from a piece of earthenware. So with Adam previous to partaking of this fruit; good could not be described to him, because he never had experienced the opposite. As to undertaking to explain to him what evil was, you might as well have undertaken to explain, to a being that never had, for one moment, had his eyes closed to the light, what darkness is. The tree of knowledge of good and evil was placed there that man might gain certain information he never could have gained otherwise; by partaking of the forbidden fruit he experienced misery, then he knew that he was once happy, previously he could not comprehend what happiness meant, what good was; but now he knows it by contrast, now he is filled with sorrow and wretchedness, now he sees the difference between his former and present condition, and if by any means he could be restored to his first position, he would be prepared to realize it, like the man that never had seen the light. Let the man to whom all the beauties of light have been displayed, and who has never been in darkness, be in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, deprived of his natural sight; what a change this would be to him; he never knew anything about darkness before, he never understood the principle at all; it never entered the catalogue of his ideas, until darkness came upon him, and his eye-sight was destroyed: now he can comprehend that the medium he once existed in was light. Now, says he, if I could only regain my sight, I could appreciate it, for I understand the contrast; restore me back again to my sight, and let me enjoy the light I once had; let me gaze upon the works of creation, let me look on the beauties thereof again, and I will be satisfied, and my joy will be full. It was so with Adam; let the way be prepared for his redemption, and the redemption of his posterity, and all creation that groans in pain to be delivered–let them be restored back again to what they lost through the fall, and they will be prepared to appreciate it. (Journal of Discourses, 1:285-286)
 

To Prove Ourselves

George Q. Cannon
    We have got to be watchful, for I tell you God has sent us here to test us and to prove us. We were true in keeping our first estate. The people that are here today stood loyally by God and by Jesus, and they did not flinch. If you had flinched then, you would not be here with the Priesthood upon you. The evidence that you were loyal, that you were true and that you did not waver is to be found in the fact that you have received the Gospel and the everlasting Priesthood.
    Now you are in your second estate, and you are going to be tested again. Will you be true and loyal to God with the curtain drawn between you and Him, shut out from His presence, and in the midst of darkness and temptation, with Satan and his invisible hosts all around you, bringing all manner of evil influences to bear upon you? The men and the women that will be loyal under these circumstances God will exalt, because it will be the highest test to which they can be subjected. (Gospel Truth, 1:7)

Brigham Young
    This is a world in which we are to prove ourselves. The lifetime of man is a day of trial, wherein we may prove to God, in our darkness, in our weakness, and where the enemy reigns, that we are our Father’s friends, and that we receive light from him and are worthy to be leaders of our children – to become lords of lords, and kings of kings – to have perfect dominion over that portion of our families that will be crowned in the celestial kingdom with glory, immortality, and eternal lives.(Discourses of Brigham Young, p.87)

Spencer W. Kimball
    Now, this mortal life is the time to prepare to meet God, which is our first responsibility. Having already obtained our bodies, which become the permanent tabernacle for our spirits through the eternities, now we are to train our bodies, our minds, and our spirits. Preeminent, then, is our using this life to perfect ourselves, to subjugate the flesh, subject the body to the spirit, to overcome all weaknesses, to govern self so that one may give leadership to others, and to perform all necessary ordinances. Secondly comes the preparation for the subduing of the earth and the elements. In Genesis, we read: “And God said, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion.” (Genesis 1:28.) (The Teachings of Spencer W. Kimball, p.31)

Ezra Taft Benson
    The great test of life is obedience to God. “We will prove them herewith,” said the Lord, “to see if they will do all things whatsoever the Lord their God shall command them” (Abraham 3:25). The great task of life is to learn the will of the Lord and then do it. (Conference Report, Apr. 1988, p. 3; or Ensign, May 1988, p. 4)

Bruce R. McConkie
    As we understand the plan of salvation, we came into this sphere of existence for two purposes. First: We came to gain this natural body, this tangible body, this body which here in this life is a temporary house for the eternal spirit, but which body we will receive back again in immortality through the atoning sacrifice of Christ. Second: We came here to see if we would have the spiritual integrity, the devotion to righteousness, to overcome the world, to put off the natural man, to bridle our passions, to curb and control the appetites that are natural in this type of existence. (Conference Report, April, 1955, p. 115)

Richard G. Scott
    Mortal life is a proving ground. God said, “We will make an earth whereon these may dwell; “And we will prove them herewith, to see if they will do all things whatsoever the Lord their God shall command them.” (see Abr. 3:24-26 [Abraham 3:24-26].)
    Our proving grounds vary. Some of us are born with physical limitations; others are lonely or do not enjoy good health. Some are challenged by economic conditions, the lack of good parental example, or a myriad of other things that test our mettle. While much of the pain and sorrow we endure is the result of our own stubborn acts of disobedience, many of the things that appear to be obstacles in our path are used by a loving Creator for our own personal growth.
    Life never was intended to be easy. Rather, it is a period of proving and growth. It is interwoven with difficulties, challenges, and burdens. We are immersed in a sea of persistent, worldly pressures that could destroy our happiness. Yet these very forces, if squarely faced, provide opportunity for tremendous personal growth and development. The conquering of adversity produces strength of character, forges self-confidence, engenders self-respect, and assures success in righteous endeavor.
    One who exercises free agency by faith grows from challenges, is purified by sorrow, and lives at peace. In contrast, one who frantically seeks to satisfy appetite and worldly desire is driven in a downward spiral to tragic depths. Temptation is the motivating influence in his exercise of free agency. (Conference Report, Oct. 1981, p. 13; or Ensign, Nov. 1981, p. 11)
 

To Have and Raise Children

First Presidency Message (Heber J. Grant, J. Reuben Clark, Jr., David O. McKay)
In the October, 1942 General Conference, J. Reuben Clark, Jr. read a message from the First Presidency to the general Church membership. Under the title of PARENTHOOD, the following was said:
    Amongst His earliest commands to Adam and Eve, the Lord said: “Multiply and replenish the earth.” He has repeated that command in our day. He has again revealed in this, the last dispensation, the principle of the eternity of the marriage covenant. He has restored to earth the authority for entering into that covenant, and has declared that it is the only due and proper way of joining husband and wife, and the only means by which the sacred family relationship may be carried beyond the grave and through eternity. He has declared that this eternal relationship may be created only by the ordinances which are administered in the holy temples of the Lord, and therefore that His people should marry only in His temple in accordance with such ordinances.
    The Lord has told us that it is the duty of every husband and wife to obey the command given to Adam to multiply and replenish the earth, so that the legions of choice spirits waiting for their tabernacles of flesh may come here and move forward under God’s great design to become perfect souls, for without these fleshly tabernacles they cannot progress to their God-planned destiny. Thus, every husband and wife should become a father and mother in Israel to children born under the holy, eternal covenant.
    By bringing these choice spirits to earth, each father and each mother assume towards the tabernacled spirit and towards the Lord Himself by having taken advantage of the opportunity He offered, an obligation of the most sacred kind, because the fate of that spirit in the eternities to come, the blessings or punishments which shall await it in the hereafter, depend, in great part, upon the care, the teachings, the training which the parents shall give to that spirit.
    No parent can escape that obligation and that responsibility, and for the proper meeting thereof, the Lord will hold us to a strict accountability. No loftier duty than this can be assumed by mortals.
    Motherhood thus becomes a holy calling, a sacred dedication for carrying out the Lord’s plans, a consecration of devotion to the uprearing and fostering, the nurturing in body, mind, and spirit, of those who kept their first estate and who come to this earth for their second estate “to see if they will do all things whatsoever the Lord their God shall command them.” (Abraham 3:25 ) To lead them to keep their second estate is the work of motherhood and “they who keep their second estate shall have glory added upon their heads for ever and ever.” (op. cit.)
    This divine service of motherhood can be rendered only by mothers. It may not be passed to others. Nurses cannot do it; public nurseries cannot do it; hired help cannot do it–only mother, aided as much as may be by the loving hands of father, brothers, and sisters, can give the full needed measure of watchful care.
    The mother who entrusts her child to the care of others, that she may do non-motherly work, whether for gold, for fame, or for civic service, should remember that “a child left to himself bringeth his mother to shame.” (Prop. 29: 15) In our day the Lord has said that unless parents teach their children the doctrines of the Church “the sin be upon the heads of the parents.” (D. & C 68:25)
    Motherhood is near to divinity. It is the highest, holiest service to be assumed by mankind. It places her who honors its holy calling and service next to the angels. To you mothers in Israel we say God bless and protect you, and give you the strength and courage, the faith and knowledge, the holy love and consecration to duty, that shall enable you to fill to the fullest measure the sacred calling which is yours. To you mothers and mothers-to-be we say: Be chaste, keep pure, live righteously, that your posterity to the last generation may call you blessed. (Conference Report, October 1942, p.12-13)

The Family: A Proclamation to the World [The First Presidency and Council of the Twelve Apostles]
    We, the First Presidency and the Council of the Twelve Apostles of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, solemnly proclaim that marriage between a man and a woman is ordained of God and that the family is central to the Creator’s plan for the eternal destiny of his children. . .
    The First Commandment that God gave to Adam and Eve pertained to their potential for parenthood as husband and wife. We declare that God’s commandment for His children to multiply and replenish the earth remains in force. We further declare that God has commanded that the sacred powers of procreation are to be employed only between man and woman, lawfully wedded as husband and wife.
    We declare the means by which mortal life is created to be divinely appointed. We affirm the sanctity of life and of its importance in God’s eternal plan.
    Husband and wife have a solemn responsibility to love and care for each other and for their children. “Children are an heritage of the Lord” (Psalms 127:3). Parents have a sacred duty to rear their children in love and righteousness, to provide for their physical and spiritual needs, to teach them to love and serve one another, to observe the commandments of God and to be law-abiding citizens wherever they live. Husbands and wives – mothers and fathers – will be held accountable before God for the discharge of these obligations.
    The family is ordained of God. Marriage between man and woman is essential to His eternal plan. Children are entitled to birth within the bonds of matrimony, and to be reared by a father and a mother who honor marital vows with complete fidelity. Happiness in family life is most likely to be achieved when founded upon the teachings of the Lord Jesus Christ. Successful marriages and families are established and maintained on principles of faith, prayer, repentance, forgiveness, respect, love, compassion, work, and wholesome recreational activities. By divine design, fathers are to preside over their families in love and righteousness and are responsible to provide the necessities of life and protection for their families. Mothers are primarily responsible for the nurture of their children. In these sacred responsibilities, fathers and mothers are obligated to help one another as equal partners. Disability, death, or other circumstances may necessitate individual adaptation. Extended families should lend support when needed.

N. Eldon Tanner
    The whole purpose of the creation of the earth was to provide a dwelling place where the spirit children of God might come and be clothed in mortal bodies and, by keeping their second estate, prepare themselves for salvation and exaltation. The whole purpose of the mission of Jesus Christ was to make possible the immortality and eternal life of man. The whole purpose of mothers and fathers should be to live worthy of this blessing and to assist God the Father and his Son Jesus Christ in their work. No greater honor could be given to [men and] women than to assist this divine plan, and I wish to say without equivocation that a woman will find greater satisfaction and joy and make a greater contribution to mankind by being a wise and worthy mother raising good children than she could make in any other vocation. (Seek Ye First the Kingdom of God, pp. 219-220).

Harold B. Lee
    Those who refuse as husbands and wives to have children are proving themselves already too small for the infinitude of God’s creative powers. (Ye Are the Light of the World, p. 267)

Dallin H. Oaks
    When married couples postpone childbearing until after they have satisfied their material goals, the mere passage of time assures that they seriously reduce their potential to participate in furthering our Heavenly Father’s plan for all of his spirit children. Faithful Latter-day Saints cannot afford to look upon children as an interference with what the world calls ‘self-fulfillment.’ Our covenants with God and the ultimate purpose of life are tied up in those little ones who reach for our time, our love, and our sacrifices. (Conference Report, Oct. 1993, pp. 100–101, or “The Great Plan of Happiness,” in Ensign [Nov. 1993], p. 75; emphasis added.)

Ezra Taft Benson
    Do not postpone the blessings of honorable parenthood following marriage. When God said it was our responsibility to multiply and replenish the earth, that marriage was primarily for that purpose, He didn’t insert any provisions. (Teachings of Ezra Taft Benson, p.540)

Howard W. Hunter
    [Quotes Genesis 1:27-28] Thus God place his own race upon the earth and instituted marriage, not only to multiply, as was commanded of the other animal world, but for the more noble and lofty purposes by which man can obtain eternal life. Marriage, as so instituted by God, is the commencement of the family, the most serious business of lifetime . . . .
    To be a successful father or a successful mother is far greater than to rise to leadership or high places in business, government, or worldly affairs. Home may seem commonplace at times with its routine duties, yet its success should be the greatest of all our pursuits in life. (The Teachings of Howard W. Hunter, p. 156)

Purpose of God is to bring us into equality with Him, Heir (Christ), Joint-heir (Us).

(Moses 1:39.)

 

39 For behold, this is my work and my glory—to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of man.

 

 (Doctrine and Covenants 76:95.)

95 And he makes them equal in power, and in might, and in dominion.

(Doctrine and Covenants 88:107.)

 

107 And then shall the angels be crowned with the glory of his might, and the saints shall be filled with his glory, and receive their inheritance and be made equal with him.

 

 

Mortality is something we choose and bring about, so God is not held accountable, thus the fall of Man through Adam.

 

The Fall of Man

 

 

The Fall is the mechanism by which the purposes of mortality are brought about in such a way that man’s agency is left intact with God not being held responsible for the consequences.

 

We sustained in premortality Adam to do the act in our behalf, remember, we don’t have a full account of what took place in the Garden of Eden, or what Adam and Eve knew. They were not stupid, but they were not wise either.  They lacked knowledge because they lacked experience.   How much of the story is figurative and how much is literal.

 

How literally do we take the story of the Garden of Eden? This we know: Adam was real. He was as real as Christ. For if Adam was not real the Fall was not real; and if the Fall was not real the Atonement was not real; and if the Atonement was not real Jesus the Christ is not and was not necessary. Of some parts of the Eden story it matters little if we choose to view them as figurative or literal, but of others it is not so. The testimony of Christ, of necessity, embraces the testimony of Adam. Had there been no Eden there could be no Gethsemane; had there been no Eve there could be no Mary; if we have not inherited death from Adam, we have no claim on everlasting life through Christ.

 

What then became of Eden? This we know: it constituted sacred space when mother earth resided in her paradisiacal state, for it was here that Adam and Eve walked and talked with God, and it was from the confines of Eden that they were cast following their transgression. Further, we know that it existed after the Fall for a period of time and that God continued to instruct Adam and Eve from its sacred groves. (Moses 5:4;  6:4.) In likening Tyrus to Eden, Ezekiel made use of the term “mountain of God” (Ezek. 28:13-14), a phrase used throughout the scriptures to depict a place where one went to commune with God, to worship, to make sacrifices, and to enter into sacred covenants. Mountains were most suited for such purposes and thus became symbols for the temple, the place where heaven and earth meet. Perhaps Ezekiel was implying that Eden was a mountain or at least had a high place suited for worship.

 

As to what became of Eden, the scriptures are silent. Perhaps, after Adam and his righteous posterity had built the city of Adam-ondi-Ahman-which undoubtedly would have had a temple-Eden was no longer needed as a place of God’s presence. A place of sacrifice and of covenant, Eden thus could either be taken into heaven or be allowed to be assimilated into the earth.

 

What of the trees of Eden? Was there actually a tree whose fruit would make one wise, and another whose fruit would assure everlasting life? The scriptural account, for instance, tells us that the Lord planted “the tree of knowledge of good and evil” in the midst of the garden (Moses 3:9). He then gave Adam and Eve the command: “Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat, but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it, nevertheless, thou mayest choose for thyself, for it is given unto thee; but, remember that I forbid it, for in the day thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die” (Moses 3:16-17). “Again,” wrote Elder Bruce R. McConkie, “the account is speaking figuratively. What is meant by partaking of the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil is that our first parents complied with whatever laws were involved so that their bodies would change from their state of paradisiacal immortality to a state of natural mortality.”fn Elder McConkie also wrote elsewhere: “We do not know how the fall was accomplished any more than we know how the Lord caused the earth to come into being and to spin through the heavens in its paradisiacal state.”fn

 

If we were to reason that it was the fruit itself that brought about this change in the bodies of Adam and Eve, we would then have to suppose that our first parents fed some of the fruit to all the other living things upon the whole earth. Had they not done so, “all things which were created must have remained in the same state in which they were after they were created; and they must have remained forever, and had no end” (2 Ne. 2:22; see also Moses 3:9). Every plant and animal, including all sea life and the fowls of the air, would have been required to eat some of this fruit (and must also have been precluded from partaking of it either by design or accident before this point of time).

 

What of the serpent that beguiled Eve into partaking of the forbidden fruit? Did animals in Eden have the capacity to converse in the language of men, as some ancient traditions suggest? Was it then a natural thing for Eve to have a conversation with a serpent? And what of the curse which consigned the serpent to crawl upon its belly and eat of the dust of the earth? Does this suggest that snakes once stood upright, having legs and arms, as they are so commonly depicted in ancient Egyptian drawings? The key question is, Did Satan actually possess the body of a serpent and speak to Eve through that medium, or did Moses choose to describe Eve’s confrontation with the father of lies as a discussion with a snake because a snake is such a vivid metaphor to dramatize the subtle, crafty, and dangerous nature of the devil?

 

Whether a serpent was actually the agent of deception in the Eden story or merely a metaphorical representation of the devil, it matters little. Neither point of view changes or tampers with the integrity of the story. If, however, we assume the partaking of the fruit to have been a figurative representation of what actually brought about the transformation of the earth from a paradisiacal to a natural or mortal sphere, then it might follow that the speaking serpent would also have been figurative.

 

What, then, do we conclude of the Eden story? Was it figurative or literal? We answer by way of comparison. It, like the temple ceremony, combines a rich blend of both. Our temples are real, the priesthood is real, the covenants we enter into are real, and the blessings we are promised by obedience are real; yet the teaching device may be metaphorical. We are as actors on a stage. We role-play and imagine. We do not actually advance from one world to another in the temple, but rather are taught with figurative representations of what can and will be.

 

EDEN AS AN ALLEGORY

 

Should it ever be our privilege to call upon father Adam and ask him to share with us his treasured memories of Eden, can we not confidently suppose that he would speak in reverent terms of walking with God and being instructed by him? Would he not speak of hands that were laid upon his head to convey the priesthood and its keys? Would he not tell of his marriage with his beloved companion, Eve, and the charge given to them to multiply and fill the earth with their posterity? Would he not recount that instruction given him and his eternal companion by which they could obtain the fulness of heavenly knowledge and power? Would he not rehearse how he had been taught the law of sacrifice (Moses 5:1-8) and how he and Eve had been clothed in the garments of salvation preparatory to their entering the lone and dreary world, where they were to be tried and tested in all things?

 

A rehearsal of the key events of Eden brings the realization that we too are privileged to leave the lone and dreary world and enter the sacred sanctuaries of the Lord, where we participate in essentially the same experiences known to our first parents before the Fall. The temple is to us as Eden was to Adam and Eve. It is in the temple that we, like Adam and Eve, are invited to walk with God; it is in the temple that we are instructed in those things that we must do to return to his holy presence; it is in the temple that we are married for eternity and commanded to multiply and replenish the earth; it is within these sacred walls that we are taught the law of sacrifice, placed under covenant to be true and faithful, and clothed in a garment of protection.

 

After Adam and Eve had partaken of the forbidden fruit, but before they were expelled from the garden, the Father taught them the law of sacrifice. Animals were slain that Adam and Eve might be clothed in “coats of skins” (Moses 4:27) that were to be a protection to them in our fallen world. Adam and Eve subsequently learned that the shedding of the animals’ blood was in similitude of the atoning blood of Christ (Moses 5:7). Thus the garments given them in Eden were to serve as a constant reminder that through the atoning blood of Christ they could be protected from all the effects of a fallen world. Through his blood they could obtain a remission of sins, be born again, and return to the divine presence.

 

Adam and Eve were further instructed by an angel of the Lord that they were to take upon them the name of Christ and that all they did was to be done in his name (Moses 5:8). Thus as God had clothed them in coats or garments of skin as a token of the protection provided them through Christ, a protection from the effects of a fallen world, so they were to clothe themselves in his name by faith, and in that name they were to do all that they did that pertained to salvation or to things of the Spirit. Thus they were assured that they could overcome.

 

“He that hath an ear, let him hear,” John wrote unto the seven churches in Asia, “what the Spirit saith unto the churches; To him that overcometh will I give to eat of the tree of life” (Revelation 2:7). The fruit is the gospel of Jesus Christ and is described by Lehi as being “desirable to make one happy” and as filling the soul with “exceedingly great joy” (1 Ne. 8:10-12). To Nephi it was revealed that the tree of life-that tree which stood in the midst of Eden-represented the love of God, and by extension, the eternal life made possible by the atonement of the Son of God (see 1 Ne. 11:4-21).

 

 

(Joseph Fielding McConkie and Robert L. Millet, eds., The Man Adam [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1990], 27.)

 

 

We can equate good and evil with food, eating is universal, bitter and sweet is also universal.

 

Snakes were very symbolic among the children of Israel; the temple is also very symbolic.

 

The Fall is literal for everyone, here we are in a telestial world, but God has shown us the way back.

 

Satan doesn’t come out in the open, he uses something already created against us, technology etc.

 

The serpent was already here, Satan used it to beguile Eve.  Adam was not deceived, he knowingly partook of the fruit that man might be. 

 

Eve’s choice affected her

 

Adam’s choice affected all of creation on this earth, (man/animals/nature).

 

Scriptural account of the Fall:

 

Moses 4-5, 2 Nephi 2:22-24

 

 (2 Nephi 2:22-24.)

 

22 And now, behold, if Adam had not transgressed he would not have fallen, but he would have remained in the garden of Eden. And all things which were created must have remained in the same state in which they were after they were created; and they must have remained forever, and had no end.

 

23 And they would have had no children; wherefore they would have remained in a state of innocence, having no joy, for they knew no misery; doing no good, for they knew no sin.

 

24 But behold, all things have been done in the wisdom of him who knoweth all things.

 

 

Tree of Life – Eternal Life (Celestial kingdom, someday we will eat this fruit)           

 

Tree of Good and Evil – Death (Physical and spiritual death enters mortality)

 

 

God

 

Adam – Priesthood leader, got his commands from God

 

Eve – Mother of all living, got her commands from Adam, don’t eat from this tree

 

Serpent

 

Satan – Used the serpent to get to Eve (alone without Adam present, we are weaker alone)

 

2 commands – Multiply and replenish the earth and don’t eat from the tree of good and evil.

 

(Moses 4:10-11.)

 

10 And the serpent said unto the woman: Ye shall not surely die;

 

11 For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.

 

Lie – Thou shalt not die

 

Truth – Eat the fruit and be like God knowing good and evil

 

Motive – She eats the fruit to become like God and she thought there would be no consequences.

 

An analogy would be taking a child over to a hot stove.  The child needed to be taught a lesson about hot stoves, the parents warned the child they would be hurt by the stove.  If the parents took the child to the stove and purposely placed their hand on the stove they would be jailed for child abuse!  

 

Adam independently made the choice to eat the fruit and bring about mortality.

 

The Garden of Eden was placed east.  Adam and Eve were driven further east out of the Garden.  Temples face east, yet we head west inside temples to be where God is, the Holy of Holies in the Tabernacle!  The direction is east to west.

 

 

Pulpits in the Kirtland Temple

 

Elder Erastus Snow later declared that the Kirtland Temple was built "to show forth the order of the Priesthood, Aaronic and Melchizedek."fn Although Elder Snow may have been referring to the ordinances received in the temple, his statement well describes the temple building itself. For example, an unusual feature was the placing of pulpits at both ends of the two main halls. Those on the west were for the use of the Melchizedek Priesthood, while those on the east were for the Aaronic. At each end there were four levels, one behind and above the other, with three pulpits on each level. Initials on each pulpit represented the priesthood office held by the individual occupying it. These arrangements helped Church members to understand the relative authority of various groups of priesthood leaders.fn

 

 

(Milton V. Backman, Jr., ed., Regional Studies in Latter-day Saint History: Ohio [Provo: BYU Department of Church History and Doctrine, 1990], 112.)

 

 

 

Celestial                     Terrestrial                      Telestial

 

The Order of Priesthood Ordinances

 

Mosaic Ordinances Prefigured Christ's Ministry

 

This was not an epistle to Gentiles, but to Hebrews, those schooled in the law of Moses. It was one thing to know the law and entirely another to know the reason for the law. Similarly, in our day it is one thing to know what the Bible says and entirely another to know what the Bible means. Israel had her tabernacle—within the temple; the altar, ark, veil, Holy of Holies, and so forth—in which sacrifices and cleansing ordinances were performed, which Paul, by the spirit of revelation, now identifies as similitudes of the coming of the Son of God. Through these ordinances, the faithful among the ancients obtained a forgiveness of sins and learned what was required of them to obtain the rest of the Lord.

 

Let us briefly identify the symbolism associated with those parts of Israel's ancient temple worship referred to by Paul in Hebrews 9:

 

Tabernacle: The tabernacle was a portable temple of the Lord, the place of the divine presence, and thus represents the kingdoms of heaven. The outer court represents the telestial order, the holy place the terrestrial order, and the Holy of Holies, the celestial world, the place where the throne of God is found.

 

Candlestick: The seven-branched candelabrum of the tabernacle was part of the furniture of the holy place. It was not lighted by candles, but by pure olive oil in cup-shaped containers resting on the head of each of its branches. (Ex. 25:31-40.) Its light represents the light of the Holy Spirit. The seven branches or stems represent the fullness and perfection of the revelations of God and could be taken as affirmation that they would burn brightly in seven great gospel dispensations.

 

Table: Paul's reference is to the table of shewbread that stood on the north or right side as one entered the holy place. It faced the candlestick and upon it were to be placed twelve loaves of bread made of fine (unleavened) flour. Paul does not identify its symbolism. Its equivalent in our day could be the sacrament table.

 

Shewbread: Literally translated, the name shewbread means "the bread of faces," or "the bread of the presence," signifying that this bread was placed before the face of the Lord or in his presence. That there is a common symbolism between the Sabbath ritual in which the priests were to eat the shewbread and the ordinance of the sacrament, as introduced by Christ, seems apparent.

 

Sanctuary: The sanctuary, in this text, refers to the holy place.

 

Veil: Paul's reference is to the thick curtain separating the Holy of Holies from the holy place in the temple. The rending of the veil symbolizes the removal of the barrier between man and God, for man is thus enabled "to enter into the holiest by the blood of Jesus." (Heb. 10:19.) Thus, the faithful and obedient can, in the fullest and most complete sense, enter into the rest of the Lord.

 

Holiest of All: By holiest of all, Paul is referring to the Holy of Holies. This, the most sacred place in the temple, is the symbolic representation of the heavenly temple where the throne of God sits.

 

Golden Censer: The vessel used for the burning of incense in the holy place was known as the golden censer. (Paul seems to indicate that this was housed in the Holy of Holies. There is nothing in the Old Testament that corroborates this.) The smoke rising from the vessel is a symbol of the prayers of Israel rising to God. (Ps. 141:2.)

 

Ark of the Covenant: Housed within the Holy of Holies, the ark of the covenant signifies the divine presence and as such is the most sacred symbol in ancient Israel.

 

Manna: Among the sacred relics found within the temple was a golden pot containing some of the manna sent down from heaven as food for Israel during their wilderness wanderings. This bread from heaven typifies the spiritual salvation that could be had only through Christ, who is the Bread of Life.

 

Aaron's Rod: To affirm his call to Aaron and his tribe to labor in the priesthood in preference to the other tribes, the Lord instructed Moses to have each of the tribes bring a rod or branch with the name of their prince on it. These twelve rods were then placed before the Lord in the Holy of Holies. The following morning when Moses went to the sacred place, he found the rod of Aaron covered with buds, blossoms, and even mature almonds. The other rods remained as barren as before. (Num. 17.) As I have written elsewhere, "The symbolism associated with this test was most deliberate: A rod, or branch, had been chosen to represent each of the twelve tribes or families of Israel; each had its name carefully placed upon it. By tradition, the rod, as a staff or sceptre, represented one's position and authority. Together, all were presented before the Lord. By making Aaron's rod bud, blossom, and put forth fruit, the Lord demonstrated once again that it was for him to choose those who will stand in his stead, be filled with his power, and bring forth his fruits." fn

 

Tables of the Covenant: The tables of the covenant refers to the tablets upon which the Ten Commandments were written.

 

Cherubim: The images of two cherubim were placed over the mercy seat of the ark in the Holy of Holies. Cherubim are angels, set to guard the way before the presence of the Lord. They are to see that no unclean thing enters the divine presence.

 

Mercy Seat: The mercy seat is the golden lid to the ark of the covenant: This lid, which covers the ark, is a symbolic representation of the manner in which the Atonement overarches or covers all that is sacred. The name comes from the Hebrew kapporeth, which, in turn, comes from the root kaphar, meaning to cover or expiate. It implies the making of an atonement, a cleansing or forgiving.

 

Though Paul did not detail the meaning of each of these items associated with the temple, his purpose was to emphasize that each was intended as a witness of Jesus as the Christ.

 

 

(Robert L. Millet, ed., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 6: Acts to Revelation [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1987], 206.)

 

 

 

For the Egyptians and the Babylonians, as for us, the temple represents the principle of ordering the universe. It is the hierocentric point around which all things are organized. It is the omphalos (“navel”) around which the earth was organized (cf. fig. 39, p. 160). The temple is a scale model of the universe, boxed to the compass, a very important feature of every town in our contemporary civilization, as in the ancient world. Fn (Years ago, Sir James George Frazer noticed a definite pattern among ancient religious cult practices: they all followed the same patterns throughout the whole world. Fn He explained that as representing certain stages of evolution in which the mind naturally expressed itself in those forms. But since then the gaps between these various cultures have been filled in, to show that civilization was far more connected.) Civilization is hierocentric, centered around the holy point of the temple. The temple was certainly the center of things in Babylonia, in Egypt, in Greece — wherever you go. This was certainly so in pioneer Utah. This pattern descended, of course, from ancient times to the Latter-day Saint church. The pioneer Saints throughout the half-explored wastes of “Deseret” oriented their streets with reference to the temple. The street is designated first; second, third, east, west, north, or south, depending on its orientation to the temple. The temple is boxed to the compass. On the west end of the Salt Lake Temple you see the Big Dipper represented a very important feature (fig. 2). Like the Egyptian temple at Dendera, you had to have the Big Dipper there, representing the North Star, around which all things pivot (fig. 3). Fn The main gate must face east. The sun, the moon, and the stars — the three degrees — are represented there. It is a scale model of the universe, for teaching purposes and for the purpose of taking our bearings on the universe and in the eternities, both in time and in space. And of course as far as time is concerned, we take our center there. We are in the middle world, working for those who have been before and who will come after. We are, so to speak, “transferring” our ancestors (we have their records — all quite recent; and let us remember that the genealogy records were kept in the basement of the Salt Lake Temple, where they belong) in the sense that the work for people who lived long ago makes it possible for them to project their existences into what is to come in the future.

 

 (Hugh Nibley, Temple and Cosmos: Beyond This Ignorant Present, edited by Don E. Norton [Salt Lake City and Provo: Deseret Book Co., Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies, 1992], 14 – 19.)

 

 

 

The church was established in the east and moved westward; temples were built as it progressed west. 

 

The Garden of Gethsemane was on the west side of Solomon’s temple and the Dead Sea is on the east side of the temple.

 

Garden of Eden: Prototype Sanctuary

 

Donald W. Parry

 

 

The Garden of Eden ractice (Genesis 2-3) contains a number of powerful symbols that are related to and represent archetypal depictions of subsequent Israelite temple systems. In a cogent manner, the Garden of Eden, as it is referred to throughout the Bible, Pseudepigrapha, and rabbinic writings, served as the prototype, pattern, and/or originator of subsequent Israelite temples, “a type of archetypal sanctuary.” Fn The garden was not a sanctuary built of cedar or marble, for it is not necessary for a temple to possess an edifice or structure; but rather it was an area of sacred space made holy because God’s presence was found there. Mircea Eliade has stated that the Garden of Eden was the heavenly prototype of the temple, fn and the Book of Jubilees 3:19 adds that “the garden of Eden is the Holy of Holies, and the dwelling of the Lord.” This essay will examine these claims.

 

Eleven prototypical aspects of the Garden of Eden will be examined. They are

 

(1) The tree of life was located both in the garden and in the temple.

 

(2) Both the garden and the temple were associated with sacred waters.

 

(3) Eastward orientations played a role in the garden story and in subsequent Israelite temples.

 

(4) The cosmic mountain was symbolically affiliated with the garden and temple.

 

(5) The account of the earth’s creation is closely connected with the Garden of Eden ractice and the temple.

 

(6) Cherubim, or heavenly beings, function as guardians of the garden and the temple.

 

(7) Revelation was an essential part of the garden and the temple.

 

(8) Sacrifice existed in the garden and in subsequent temple systems.

 

(9) Similar religious language existed in both the garden and the temple.

 

(10) Sacred vestments were associated with Adam and Eve in the garden and with the priesthood in the Jerusalem temple.

 

(11) Abundance was associated with the garden and the temple.

 

61      The Tree of Life

 

Much attention is given to the tree of life by the author of Genesis 2-3. It is referred to on three occasions. The first citation to the tree is recorded in Genesis 2:9, where it is stated that God planted “the tree of life in the middle of the garden.” Fn In this account the tree is a definite tree (preceded by the definite article, hence called “the tree”), and it is located at the center of Eden’s garden. The tree stands opposite the “tree of knowledge of good and evil,” or the tree of death. Fn It is found in the same context as the river of Eden. The second and third references to the tree of life are found in connection with God’s desire to protect the tree from the hands of Adam and Eve (Genesis 3:22-24). We learn that Adam and Eve, had they been permitted to partake of the fruit of the tree of life, would have lived forever. To prevent access to the tree, God established cherubim and a flaming sword at the east entrance of the garden.

 

 

The continuity of the tree of life icon in Israelite temple society is evident when one considers the nature of the tabernacle menorah or seven-branched lampstand. The menorah, as an important religious symbol for the Israelite community, is given due consideration in the Pentateuch. Its construction (Exodus 25:31-40; 37:17-24), consecration (Exodus 30:27; 40:9), placement in the tabernacle (Exodus 25:37; Numbers 8:2-3), and the manner of transporting it (Numbers 3:31; 4:9) are items of discussion in the scriptures. The sacred object was also located in the Solomonic temple (1 Kings 7:49), wherein a total of ten menorahs were used, all made of pure gold, five standing on the north and five standing on the south side of the holy place of the temple. The second temple possessed a lampstand, although the sources regarding this situation are unclear and often contradictory. Fn

 

That the menorah was a stylized tree of life is made clear in the description produced in Exodus 25:31-40. fn The menorah must have had the appearance of a tree, possessing seven branches (a number of symbolic significance to the Israelite community) and a number of flowers (almond blossoms?). It may be concluded that the actual, living tree of life was present in the garden, and symbolic representations of the tree of life, in the form of lampstands, were present in later Israelite temples.

 

(2) Sacred Waters

 

Several analogous scriptural narratives employ imagistic descriptions of sacral waters originating and flowing from the temple. The prophet Joel explicitly asserts that “a fountain shall come forth from the house of the Lord” (Joel 3:18). After providing a lengthy description of the future temple of Jerusalem (see Ezekiel 40-46), Ezekiel presents a statement regarding a river that would flow from the threshold of the temple, through the courtyard, and out of the city of Jerusalem, finally reaching the Dead Sea. The prophecy states that the temple river will heal the putrid waters of the Dead Sea, bless fishermen with an abundance of fish, and increase fruit-bearing vegetation in the deserts. In short, the temple river will bless mankind with a paradisiacal earth (see Ezekiel 47:1-12). John the Revelator beheld a vision that hearkens back to the original paradisiacal state of the Garden of Eden. Speaking of the temple in heaven, the seer describes “a pure river of water of life, clear as crystal, proceeding out of the throne of God and of the Lamb” (Revelation 22:1-4). The throne of God, of course, is situated in the Holy of Holies of the temple.

 

The book of Daniel describes a different type of river, also issuing from a throne. After receiving an eschatological vision, Daniel provides a description of the Ancient of Days sitting upon his throne of “fiery flame.” Flowing from the throne was a “fiery stream” (Daniel 7:9-11). Two pseudepigraphic passages recall Daniel’s statement. The first, 3 Enoch 36:1-2, reads, “A river of fire . . . flows beneath the throne of glory”; and the second, 1 Enoch 14:15, says, “Beneath the throne were issuing streams of flaming fire.” Enoch, similar to John’s and Daniel’s portrayal, describes the waters as coming from the throne, suggesting that God is the source of the waters.

 

The rivers of Eden, described in Genesis 2-3, represent the quintessential sacred waters. Originating, according to 3 Enoch 18:19, “opposite the throne of glory,” these pure waterways separate into four rivers and go forth from Eden to water the entire earth (see Genesis 2:10). Fn It is evident that Eden’s sacral waters served as a model for subsequent temple rivers.

 

(3) Eastward Orientation

 

Spatial orientation played a vital role in the architectural setting of ancient Near Eastern temples. Fn So too, the Mosaic tabernacle and the temples of Jerusalem were directionally situated so that the entrance of the tabernacle or temple faced eastward. The Garden of Eden, possessing a number of templelike qualities, produced the prototypical pattern for subsequent Israelite temple orientation. Fn East appears to be the direction of import in Eden. Three biblical statements reveal a concern for orientation in Eden: fn

 

(1) The fact that God planted the garden in the east section of Eden (see Genesis 2:8) suggests a primacy for the direction. Although the purpose for this location in Eden is not explicitly stated, it is generally accepted by scholars that east, possessing a number of symbolic meanings, is the sacred direction in Israelite religion.

 

(2) The second designation of “east” in the garden ractice is mentioned in connection with the four rivers of Eden. It is likely that the four rivers of Eden (see Genesis 2:10-14) fn flowed outward from Eden toward the four cardinal directions—north, east, south, and west. Eden is depicted as being established at the center of the four rivers, perhaps providing the water source for the four rivers. The etymological meaning of the word templum (English “temple”) fn has a direct connection with the four cardinal directions, a concept that has been well established by a number of authors. Fn Of special note in the narrative description of the rivers is that all four rivers are mentioned by name—Pison, Gihon, Hiddekel, Euphrates—but only one of the four directions is mentioned by name. River number three flowed eastward, writes the author of Genesis. The directional flow of the other three rivers is unknown.

 

(3) Once more east takes a prominent position in the garden story. After Adam and Eve were expelled from thegarden, God placed cherubim and a flaming sword at “the east of the garden of Eden” (Genesis 3:24; Alma 12:21) to prevent the fallen couple from an unauthorized return to the garden. This celestial blockade suggests that there existed an entrance to the garden established at the east end of the garden. If no such entrance existed, then why would a blockade be necessary? Or, if other entrances were found to the garden, then why did God not establish cherubim and swords at other locations around the garden? Once more the eastward orientation of the Garden of Eden parallels the eastward orientation of the Mosaic tabernacle and Jerusalem temples, having entrances at the east.

 

(4) Cosmic Mountain

 

Every Near Eastern temple symbolically recalls a mountain, fn but the first temple complex (i.e., the Garden of Eden) possessed a mountain in actuality. The biblical Garden of Eden account alludes to the presence of a mountain. Be it remembered that a river originated in Eden that divided into four heads, and flowed outward (i.e, downward) into the four parts of the world. Assuming that the natural laws of gravitation were in effect during this primordial era, the rivers of Eden would have flowed downward, suggesting that Eden was located at an elevation higher (i.e., a mountain) than surrounding territories.

 

 

Placing assumptions aside, however, biblical evidence delineates a mountain in Eden. In Ezekiel 28:11-16 the king of Tyre is metaphorically compared to Adam. The king is told: “Thou hast been in Eden the garden of God. . . . Thou art the anointed cherub that covereth; and I have set thee so: thou wast upon the holy mountain of God. . . . Thou wast perfect in thy ways from the day that thou wast created, till iniquity was found in thee. . . . Thou hast sinned: therefore I will cast thee as profane out of the mountain of God” (vv. 13-16). The terms “garden of God,” “Eden,” and “cherub” and the concept of sin are express Edenic themes found in Genesis 2-3. Ezekiel employs Edenic typology, explain-ing that Tyre (Adam) was perfect while in the Garden of Eden, was anointed, and for a period of time dwelt on the mountain of God. But he sinned and was thrown from the mountain, or cast from the temple, since no unclean thing was allowed in the temple. Important for our purposes is the notion that a mountain existed in Eden.

 

Pseudepigraphic 1 Enoch 18:6-12, 24-25 provides a description of the mountains in Eden. During a panoramic vision of paradise, Enoch beheld several extraordinary mountains. All of them were “dignified and glorious” and made of precious and ethereal stones. And, more importantly, the mountains (which were in groups of three) were not arranged across the horizon as are the typical adjacent-type mountains. Rather, Enoch noticed that the mountains were stacked three high, one on top of the other, escalating heavenward. The mountains “were pressing into heaven like the throne of God” and reached skyward “where the heavens come together.” This idea of mountains one on top of the other, or three high, is the apotheosis of “successive ascension toward heaven.” Fn

 

These concepts hearken back to the ancient Near Eastern idea of the primordial mound fn or the primordial hillock. According to the Babylonian tradition, for example, the Eninnu temple, which was built by Gudea, is representative of the primordial hillock that arose out of the chaotic waters (apsu). Fn Regarding the Egyptian view of the primordial mound, Lundquist writes that “in Egypt . . . all temples are seen as representing the primeval hillock.” Fn The primordial mound projects backward into history to the period of the creation of the earth, where, according to one Hebrew tradition, the primordial mound was the first land that emerged from the waters of chaos during the creative period (cf. Genesis 1:9-10). Fn Identified as the consecrated topos, the primordial mound represented order and definition amidst the unruly chaotic waters. Fn

 

From the rudimentary concept of the primordial hillock developed the idea of the cosmic mountain (i.e., the temple), with its careful delimitation, well-defined borders, and clear-cut spaces. The transition from a raw natural mountain to a synthetic physical temple edifice seems to have been quite natural. In the first place, temple buildings retained their distinct mountain character by being constructed of natural indigenous materials, many times coming from the mountains themselves. Persons who stood before the lofty components of the temple would naturally look heavenward, similar to one who stands before a striking mountain. In this regard the temple became “the architectural embodiment of the cosmic mountain.” Fn More importantly, however, the temple building was constructed upon a mountain or hillock of known importance. The temples of Jerusalem (Solomon’s, Zerubbabel’s, and Herod’s), all being constructed upon the identical mount, were part of a continuing tradition of sacred events that occurred there. What was once a sacred topos now became a sacred topos with sacral architecture superimposed upon it.

 

(5) Creation

 

Significantly, the garden story immediately follows the creation ractice in the book of Genesis. As has been shown elsewhere in this volume, there is a direct connection between the creation of the cosmos and ancient Near Eastern ritual. Several scholars, including Weinfeld and Kearney, have noted the connection between the creation of the cosmos and the Israelite temple. Weinfeld juxtaposes the creation account (Genesis 1-2) with the chapters of Exodus that deal with the construction of the Tabernacle (see, especially, Exodus 39-40), and then presents several points of comparison between the two accounts. He notes that after six days of divine creative activity, God rested on the seventh day. Similarly, after the construction of the Tabernacle, which also took six days, Deity rested. Fn

 

Carrying the point a step further, Fisher reveals that the temple of Solomon was built in seven years (see 1 Kings 6:38), precisely as the world was created in seven days. Fisher concludes that “one must speak of ordering the cosmos in terms of seven even as the construction of the microcosm must be according to the same pattern.” Fn Hence, it may be determined that the construction of the Mosaic tabernacle and Solomonic temple recall the formation of the earth. Just as chaos became organized and orderly, so the temple brings order and organization unto the world.

 

P. J. Kearney also draws a number of comparisons between the creation account (Genesis 1-2) and the Tabernacle ractice (Exodus 25-31). Fn Both God and Aaron brought forth light—God brought forth light unto the world (see Genesis 1:2-3); Aaron produced light for the Tabernacle precinct (see Exodus 30:1-8). In Genesis, God created the seas and placed the topos within the waters; in the temple the bronze laver or molten sea was constructed according to God’s instructions and became part of the temple precinct (cf. Genesis 1:9-10 and 1 Kings 7:23). Kearney believes that temple building in the ancient world was a natural consequence of and built upon the creation of the world. Fn

 

One additional correspondence between the creation of the cosmos and the construction of the temple may be added to the list—Deity acted as overseer for both activities. At the completion of his creative work of the cosmos, God declared the work to be “good” (Genesis 1:10, 12, 18, 21, 25), and then God blessed and sanctified the seventh day (see Genesis 2:3).

 

(6) Cherubim

 

In the biblical writings the first mention of cherubim (Hebrew plural form of cherub) is found in the Edenic account. God “drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to [guard] the tree of life” (Genesis 3:24). Symbolic likenesses of the cherubim were later embroidered into the veil of the tabernacle (see Exodus 26:31) and carved into the walls, doors, and panels of the temple of Solomon (see 1 Kings 6:29-35; 7:29, 36). Fn In addition, two large cherubim were placed on either side of the throne of God in the Holy of Holies (see 1 Kings 6:23-28; Exodus 25:18-22; 1 Samuel 4:4; 2 Samuel 6:2). The cherubim were identical in size and possessed great wings that extended from one wall of the Holy of Holies to the other. Each cherub was made of olive wood, which was overlaid with gold. Ezekiel also mentions cherubim in his description of Jerusalem’s future temple (see 41:18-25).

 

A primary mission of the cherubim, together with the flaming sword, was to protect the tree of life so that man, in his unworthy state, would not partake of the fruit of the tree (cf. also Alma 42:2-3). Fn The locale of the representations of the cherubim in the temples held significance. They were located on either side of the throne of God (mercy seat), embroidered into the veil, and situated along the path that led to God’s presence. The cherubim functioned as divine sentinels, guarding the path leading to the presence of God, preventing the trespass by unauthorized persons.

 

(7) Revelation

 

One of the many boons of the ancient temple setting was that direct communication between God and man was possible. The prophetic theological stance of the era was directional prayer, wherein temple worshipers directed their prayers toward the Jerusalem temple (see 1 Kings 8:42; Psalms 5:7; 138:2; Daniel 6:10; Jonah 2:4). Similarly, revelation was extant in the Garden of Eden, for “communication with Heaven was easy in illo tempore,” and the meeting between the gods and man took place in actuality. Fn Communing with God was a simple matter for man, because man could climb the mountain of Eden, then the tree of life, and ascend to heaven. Fn 2 Enoch 31:2 states that in the beginning God gave Adam “open heavens” so that the first man could “look upon the angels.”

 

Examples of divine conversation (or direct revelation) between God and man in the Garden of Eden abound in Genesis 2 and 3:

 

2:16 “and the Lord God commanded the man, saying”

 

2:18 “and the Lord God said”

 

3:8 “and they heard the voice of the Lord God”

 

3:9 “and the Lord God called unto Adam”

 

3:11 “and he [God] said”

 

3:13 “and the Lord God said unto the woman”

 

3:16 “unto the woman he [God] said”

 

3:17 “and unto Adam he [God] said”

 

3:22 “and the Lord God said”

 

Both Adam and Eve received numerous personal communications from God in the garden setting. After the Fall, however, the couple prayed at an altar, and revelation became much less frequent, and it took place in different forms and at different places.

 

(8) Sacrifice

 

It is well known that animal sacrifices formed a considerable portion of ancient Israelite temple ritual. Fn Entire sections of the Bible are dedicated to the various types of sacrifices, outlining the rules and commandments regarding the sacrifices. The numerous laws of sacrifice as revealed to Moses were not known in the Garden of Eden. However, the biblical text implies that sacrifice did exist before Adam and Eve were cast out of the garden. After God cursed Adam and Eve, he made garments of animal skins for the couple and then “clothed them” (Genesis 3:21). It is significant that God used an animal skin to clothe Adam and Eve. To acquire the skin, an animal had to be slain, and perhaps the animal was slaughtered as part of a sacrificial ceremony.

 

Is it possible that God himself performed the sacrifice? And do we know what type of animal was sacrificed? If God did not perform the sacrifice on behalf of Adam and Eve, who did? And if a lamb (or bullock) were not used for the coats of skin, then what type of skins did Adam and Eve wear? Certainly, they would not have used the skin of a camel or swine or other animal considered to be unclean to the later Israelites. Inasmuch as lambs were slaughtered by the thousands as part of the law of Moses, the skin of a lamb was the logical choice. Conceivably, God sacrificed a lamb, typically pointing forward to the moment when the Lamb of God would be slaughtered as an atoning sacrifice on behalf of all mankind. It is also noteworthy that God himself “clothed” Adam and Eve with the garments. Such personal attention by Deity to the matter of the coats of skins underscores the liturgical import of the garments. Candlish, who believes that animal sacrifice originated in the garden, has noted that since God “concerned himself with the materials” of the garments, something “higher and holier” was intended, some spiritual meaning and purpose for the skins. Fn

 

Apparently the animal sacrifice conducted by God in the Garden of Eden represented only one type of sacrifice, for extracanonical scriptures identify sacrificial concepts with the garden. A passage from the Books of Adam and Eve implies that Adam and Eve practiced a form of sacrifice before they were cast from the garden. After the fall of Adam, the first man pled with the angels: “Behold, ye cast me out. I pray you, allow me to take away fragrant herbs from paradise, so that I may offer an offering to God after I have gone out of paradise that he hear me.” Fn

 

(9) Esoteric Language

 

Frequently the descriptive language of the scriptures regarding the Israelite temples recalls the Garden of Eden experience. Three specific phrases, found in connection with the Garden of Eden, are also used by later biblical writers while describing the tabernacle or temple. Each of the three phrases will be examined.

 

61      Adam was told to “dress it and keep [the garden]”

 

God commanded Adam to “dress” (work) and “keep” the garden (Genesis 2:15). Two Hebrew terms utilized in this statement, cabad (work) and samar (keep), are also found in descriptive statements having reference to the later Israelite temple system. For instance, the Levites were instructed to “keep (sssamar) all the vessels of the tabernacle” and “to work (cabad) the work” of the tabernacle (Numbers 3:8; author’s translation; see also Numbers 8:26; 18:5-6). Noting these parallels, Gordon Wenham has written that “if Eden is seen then as an ideal sanctuary, then perhaps Adam should be described as an archetypal Levite.” Fn Genesis Rabbah, a rabbinic commentary on the book of Genesis, saw a parallel between the garden and the temple. According to Genesis Rabbah 16:5, the phrase “to work and keep it” (Genesis 2:15; author’s translation) points to an early sacrificial order. Fn

 

Special attention should be paid to the Hebrew term cabad. Its root meaning in Hebrew is connected with the concepts of service and labor, both secular and religious. In a religious sense, the term expressly points to constructing the tabernacle (see Exodus 35:24), repairing the temple (see 2 Chronicles 34:13), and working with fine linen (see 1 Chronicles 4:21). Fn According to one Hebrew lexicon, cabad means “to worship” or “to perform a cultic rite.” Fn During the late Second Temple period, the term was also associated with temple worship, but often mentioned in connection with a sacred tree. Fn Whether or not this concept recalls the sacred tree of life of the Garden of Eden is a matter deserving further study.

 

2. God walked about Eden and the temple

 

The method by which God moved about in Eden (see Genesis 3:8) and the tabernacle (see 2 Samuel 7:6-7; Leviticus 26:12; Deuteronomy 23:14) was identical. The biblical authors describe God’s movement in both sacred places using the Hebrew hithpa’el, a verbal form of halakh. The masculine singular participial form, found only eight times in the Hebrew Bible, may be translated as “walking about” or “walking himself.” Thus, God both “walked about” in the garden and “walked about” in the tabernacle. Inasmuch as the same rare verbal form is employed in several statements regarding the temple, a connection seems to be implied between the Garden of Eden and the temple.

 

3. In the presence of the LORD

 

Menachem Haran has argued that the phrase “before the Lord” (lipnê Yahweh) indicates a temple setting. He writes that “in general, any cultic activity to which the biblical text applies the formula ‘before the Lord’ can be considered an indication of the existence of a temple at the site, since this expression stems from the basic conception of the temple as a divine dwelling-place and actually belongs to the temple’s technical terminology.” Fn The phrase is recorded in Genesis 3:8, where it is stated that “Adam and his wife hid themselves from [before] the LORD God [mippðnê Yahweh].” Fn Again, identical language is employed at both the Garden of Eden and the Jerusalem temple.

 

(10) Sacred Vestments

 

The vesting of temple worshipers and officiants with sacral vestments was customary in the Israelite temple system. Fn Entire chapters, such as Exodus 28-29, describe the sacred vestments to be worn by Aaron and his sons while ministering in the temple. The ordinary priestly vestments consisted of four parts: breeches, a headpiece, a girdle, and a tunic. The high priestly vestments consisted of eight pieces: in addition to the four vestments belonging to the priest, the high priest wore an ephod, robe, breastplate, and frontplate.

 

Adam and Eve, while in the garden, possessed two items of clothing that apparently held ritual meaning: the apron (see Genesis 3:7) and the garment of skins (see Genesis 3:21). The apron, perhaps made from fig leaves of the same tree of which they had unlawfully eaten, fn no doubt held some sort of ceremonial significance for the first couple. The garments of skins were made by God himself (see Genesis 3:21), a fact that adds to the significance and import of the sacral clothing. It is quite likely that these vestments, belonging to Adam and Eve and obtained while in the garden, served as archetypes for later sacral vestments belonging to the Israelite temple system.

 

(11) Abundance and Prosperity

 

While creating a list of motifs common among ancient Near Eastern temples, John Lundquist has determined that one conventional motif found among temple systems is that “the temple is associated with abundance and prosperity.” Fn So, too, with the situation at Eden—prosperity and abundance existed there as standard conditions. Fn The garden was planted by God himself (see Genesis 2:8), and perhaps for this reason Ezekiel called Eden the “garden of God” (28:13). Interestingly, the word Eden means “luxury” and “delight.” Fn Thus Eden connotes a situation of abundance. Noteworthy also is the idea that the garden was deemed a sacral place ritually fit and ceremonially clean (a prerequisite for Israelite temples), pure enough for God to walk about in (see Genesis 3:8-10).

 

Furthermore, God planted “every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food” (Genesis 2:9). Apparently all or many of the trees of the garden bore fruit, for God told Adam that “of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat: but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it” (Genesis 2:16-17). Also, God gave “every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat. And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat” (Genesis 1:29-30). The garden was watered by a river (see Genesis 2:10).

 

For later biblical prophets, the Garden of Eden became a byword for prosperity and fruitfulness (see Isaiah 51:3; Ezekiel 36:35; Joel 2:3). Each of these elements—God’s hand in the planting of the garden, his divine presence there, the fruit and herbs designed as food for both man and beast, and the river of water that provided a source of life for the plants—denote a place of abundance and prosperity.

 

Conclusion

 

First and foremost, the Garden of Eden became sacred space because it was created by Deity, and his presence was found there. It remained sacred (like temples) because God cast out those who had profaned it (i.e., Adam and Eve). The Garden of Eden, as described in the book of Genesis and elsewhere, contained a number of features present in subsequent Israelite temples. These features include symbolic representations of the primordial landscape: the tree of life, the sacred waters, and the cosmic mountain. In addition, the Garden of Eden and those who occupied it, similar in many respects to the Israelite temples, possessed an eastward orientation, cherubim, and sacred vestments, and it was associated with prosperity and abundance. The garden was associated with divine revelation, sacrificial ordinances, and the creation of the earth. Finally, similar religious language described both the Garden of Eden and subsequent temples.

                                                                                                                                                                                  

 

(Donald W. Parry, ed., Temples of the Ancient World: Ritual and Symbolism [Salt Lake City and Provo: Deseret Book Co., Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies, 1994], 128 – 129.)

 

 

There are important diagrams on pages 134-135 of this lecture concerning the Creation, Fall, and Atonement.

 

(Moses 4:13-21.)

 

13 And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they had been naked. And they sewed fig-leaves together and made themselves aprons.

 

14 And they heard the voice of the Lord God, as they were walking in the garden, in the cool of the day; and Adam and his wife went to hide themselves from the presence of the Lord God amongst the trees of the garden.

 

15 And I, the Lord God, called unto Adam, and said unto him: Where goest thou?

 

16 And he said: I heard thy voice in the garden, and I was afraid, because I beheld that I was naked, and I hid myself.

 

17 And I, the Lord God, said unto Adam: Who told thee thou wast naked? Hast thou eaten of the tree whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldst not eat, if so thou shouldst surely die?

 

18 And the man said: The woman thou gavest me, and commandest that she should remain with me, she gave me of the fruit of the tree and I did eat.

 

19 And I, the Lord God, said unto the woman: What is this thing which thou hast done? And the woman said: The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat.

 

20 And I, the Lord God, said unto the serpent: Because thou hast done this thou shalt be cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life;

 

21 And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, between thy seed and her seed; and he shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.

 

 

 

Adam and Eve’s lose of innocence, they are now lost, (hell, spiritual death), enmity (hatred) between man and the seed of the serpent (abominations). 

 

 

 

 

 

God >>>>>>>>>>>Adam >>>>>>>>>>>Eve <<<<<<<<<<<<Serpent <<<<<<<<<<<Satan

 

                                          Priesthood                   Church                  Ways of the World

                                     Prophets

           

 

 

Light of Christ will create an enmity, since darkness hates the light; eventually Christ Himself will come and destroy the serpent (evil, abominations) from the earth.   

 

 

That which God has created (serpent) has been used against His kingdom by Satan.  

 

                   

 

 

 

Priesthood Keys, Ordinances and Faith

 

 

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 107:53-57.)

 

53 Three years previous to the death of Adam, he called Seth, Enos, Cainan, Mahalaleel, Jared, Enoch, and Methuselah, who were all high priests, with the residue of his posterity who were righteous, into the valley of Adam-ondi-Ahman, and there bestowed upon them his last blessing.

 

54 And the Lord appeared unto them, and they rose up and blessed Adam, and called him Michael, the prince, the archangel.

 

55 And the Lord administered comfort unto Adam, and said unto him: I have set thee to be at the head; a multitude of nations shall come of thee, and thou art a prince over them forever.

 

56 And Adam stood up in the midst of the congregation; and, notwithstanding he was bowed down with age, being full of the Holy Ghost, predicted whatsoever should befall his posterity unto the latest generation.

 

57 These things were all written in the book of Enoch, and are to be testified of in due time.

 

 

Adam ondi Ahman – Prior to Adam’s death final temple ordinances were given.  Calling and election was made sure, when we lose our life to build up the kingdom we will save our own lives.

 

 

What I Hope You Will Teach
Your Children about the Temple

President Ezra Taft Benson
Ensign, Aug. 1985, pp. 6-10

The last time I saw President Heber J. Grant was in the Church Administration Building when he was quite aged. President Grant’s chauffeur had driven him to the Church Administration Building where the chauffeur called for another brother to help him assist President Grant, one on each arm, to his office.

I was just entering the glass door opposite the Lion House in the Church Administration Building as President Grant was coming toward the door. He said to the two brethren assisting him, “Isn’t that Brother Benson coming?”

They replied, “Yes.”

He said, “Come here. Come here, Brother Benson.”

I walked over to him, and President Grant said, “Did I ever tell you about the mean trick Brigham Young played on your great-grandfather?”

I said, “No, President. I didn’t know Brigham Young ever played a mean trick on anyone.”

He responded, “Oh, yes, he did. I’ll tell you about it.”

I could see that these two brethren were practically holding President Grant up, so I said, “I’ll come to the house some time. I’d like to hear it.”

He replied, “No, I’ll tell you right here. These brethren can steady me while I tell you.”

He said, “You know  where Zion’s Bank and ZCMI are over on the corner?”

I said, “Yes.”

He continued, “Your great-grandfather built the finest home in Salt Lake City on that corner, with the exception of Brigham Young’s home (which, of course, was the Lion House). He had it all finished. It was a beautiful home–two stories with a porch at both levels on both sides of the house. It had a white picket fence around it with fruit trees and ornamental trees and with a little stream running through the yard. He was all ready to move his families in from their log cabins when President Young called him into the office one day. ‘Brother Benson,’ he said, ‘we would like you to go to Cache Valley and pioneer that area and preside over the Saints. We suggest you sell your home to Daniel H. Wells.’

“Now,” President Grant said, “Daniel H. Wells was Brigham Young’s counselor. Wasn’t that a mean trick? Come on, brethren, let’s go.”

In all the years that I had attended the Benson reunions I had never heard that story. So I had it verified by the Church Historical Department, and they assured me that the facts were as President Grant related them. They told me they had a tintype picture of the old home.

Since that time, I have been most grateful for the so-called “mean trick” of President Young, because were it not for that, the Bensons would not have their roots in Cache Valley.

I love Cache Valley, and I love the Saints in the area. And I am most grateful to be here on this anniversary of the Logan Temple centennial. This beautiful temple has truly been a beacon of light to Cache Valley. If our children and their children are taught well, this edifice will continue to be a symbol of special significance.

The temple is an ever-present reminder that God intends the family to be eternal. How fitting it is for mothers and fathers to point to the temple and say to their children, “That is the place where we were [page 8] married for eternity.” By so doing, the ideal of temple marriage can be instilled within the minds and hearts of your children while they are very young.

I am grateful to the Lord that my temple memories extend back–even to young boyhood. I remember so well, as a little boy, coming in from the field and approaching the old farm house in Whitney, Idaho. I could hear my mother singing “Have I Done Any Good in the World Today?” (Hymns, no. 58.)

I can still see her in my mind’s eye bending over the ironing board with newspapers on the floor, ironing long strips of white cloth, with beads of perspiration on her forehead. When I asked her what she was doing, she said, “These are temple robes, my son. Your father and I are going to the temple at Logan.”

Then she put the old flatiron on the stove, drew a chair close to mine, and told me about temple work–how important it is to be able to go to the temple and participate in the sacred ordinances performed there. She also expressed her fervent hope that some day her children and grandchildren and great-grandchildren would have the opportunity to enjoy these priceless blessings.

These sweet memories about the spirit of temple work were a blessing in our farm home, our little rural ward of three hundred, and the old Oneida Stake. These memories have returned as I have performed the marriage of each of our children and grandchildren, my mother’s grandchildren and great-grandchildren, under the influence of the Spirit in the house of the Lord.

These are choice memories to me, and I have often reflected on them. In the peace of these lovely temples, sometimes we find solutions to the serious problems of life. Under the influence of the Spirit, sometimes pure knowledge flows to us there. Temples are places of personal revelation. When I have been weighed down by a problem or a difficulty, I have gone to the House of the Lord with a prayer in my heart for answers. These answers have come in clear and unmistakable ways.

I would like to direct my remarks to you parents and grandparents. I would like to share with you what I would hope you would teach your children about the temple.

The temple is a sacred place, and the ordinances in the temple are of a sacred character. Because of its sacredness we are sometimes reluctant to say anything about the temple to our children and grandchildren.

As a consequence, many do not develop a real desire to go to the temple, or when they go there, they do so without much background to prepare them for the obligations and covenants they enter into.

I believe a proper understanding or background will immeasurably help prepare our youth for the temple. This understanding, I believe, will foster within them a desire to seek their priesthood blessings just as Abraham sought his.

When our Heavenly Father placed Adam and Eve on this earth, He did so with the purpose in mind of teaching them how to regain His presence. Our Father promised a Savior to redeem them from their fallen condition. He gave to them the plan of salvation and told them to teach their children faith in Jesus Christ and repentance. Further, Adam and his posterity were commanded by God to be baptized, to receive the Holy Ghost, and to enter into the order of the Son of God.

To enter into the order of the Son of God is the equivalent today of entering into the fullness of the Melchizedek Priesthood, which is only received in the house of the Lord.

Because Adam and Eve had complied with these requirements, God said to them, “Thou art after the order of him who was without beginning of days or end of years, from all eternity to all eternity.” (Moses 6:67.)

Three years before Adam’s death, a great event occurred. He took his son Seth, his grandson Enos, and other high priests who were his direct-line descendants, with others of his righteous posterity, into a valley called Adam-ondi-Ahman. There Adam gave to these righteous descendants his last blessing.

The Lord then appeared to them.

The vast congregation rose up and blessed Adam and called him Michael, the prince and archangel. The Lord himself declared Adam to be a prince forever over his own posterity.

Then Adam in his aged condition rose up and, being filled with the spirit of prophecy, predicted “whatsoever should befall his posterity unto the [page 9] latest generation.” All this is recorded in section 107 of the Doctrine and Covenants (verses 53-56) [D&C 107:53-56].

The Prophet Joseph Smith said that Adam blessed his posterity because “he wanted to bring them into the presence of God.” (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, sel. Joseph Fielding Smith, Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1938, p. 159.)

Here is an illuminating passage from Section 107 of the Doctrine and Covenants which tells us how Adam was able to bring himself and his righteous posterity into God’s presence:

“The order of this priesthood was confirmed to be handed down from father to son, and tightly belongs to the literal descendants of the chosen seed, to whom the promises were made.

“This order was instituted in the days of Adam, and came down by lineage in [order] … that his posterity should be the chosen of the Lord, and that they should be preserved unto the end of the earth.” (D&C 107:40-42; italics added.)

How did Adam bring his descendants into the presence of the Lord?

The answer: Adam and his descendants entered into the priesthood order of God. Today we would say they went to the House of the Lord and received their blessings.

The order of priesthood spoken of in the scriptures is sometimes referred to as the patriarchal order because it came down from father to son.

But this order is otherwise described in modern revelation as an order of family government where a man and woman enter into a covenant with God–just as did Adam and Eve–to be sealed for eternity, to have posterity, and to do the will and work of God throughout their mortality.

If a couple are true to their covenants, they are entitled to the blessing of the highest degree of the celestial kingdom. These covenants today can only be entered into by going to the House of the Lord.

Adam followed this order and brought his posterity into the presence of God. He is the great example for us to follow.

Enoch followed this pattern and brought the Saints of his day into the presence of God.

Noah and his son Shem likewise followed the same pattern after the flood.

Abraham, a righteous servant of God, desiring as he said, “to be a greater follower of righteousness,” sought for these same blessings. Speaking of the order of the priesthood, he said: “It was conferred upon me from the fathers; it came down from the fathers, from the beginning of time … even the right of the firstborn, or the first man, who is Adam, our first father, through the fathers unto me.” (Abr. 1:2-3.)

So Abraham declared: “I sought for mine appointment unto the Priesthood according to the appointment of God unto the fathers.” (Abr. 1:4.)

Moses taught this order of priesthood to his people and “sought diligently to sanctify his people that they might behold the face of God;

“But they hardened their hearts and could not endure his presence; therefore, the Lord in his wrath, for his anger was kindled against them, swore that they should not enter into his rest while in the wilderness, which rest is the fulness of his glory.

“Therefore, he took Moses out of their midst, and the Holy Priesthood also.” (D&C 84:23-25.)

We learn through the Joseph Smith Translation that the Lord further instructed Moses: “I will take away the priesthood out of their midst; therefore my holy order, and the ordinances thereof.” (JST Ex. 34:1; italics added.)

This higher priesthood, with its attendant ordinances, was taken from Israel till the time of Jesus Christ.

My purpose in citing this background is to illustrate that this order of priesthood has been on the earth since the beginning, and it is the only means by which we can one day see the face of God and live. (See D&C 84:22.)

Between Moses and Christ only certain prophets possessed the right to the higher priesthood and the blessings that could bring men into the presence of God. One of these prophets was Elijah.

Elijah held the keys of the sealing power and did many mighty miracles in his day. He had power to seal the heavens, raise the dead, relieve the drought-stricken land, and call down fire from heaven.

He was the last prophet to hold the keys of the priesthood, according to the Prophet Joseph Smith. He was subsequently translated and taken up into heaven without tasting death.

He, as a translated being, restored the keys of this priesthood to the Savior’s chief Apostles–Peter, James, and John–on the Mount of Transfiguration. But within a generation, the Church was destroyed by a major apostasy, and the blessings of the priesthood were removed from the earth.

It took a new dispensation from heaven to restore this blessing to our day.

It is significant that the first revelation given in 1823, recorded as section 2 of the Doctrine and Covenants, gave this promise about the priesthood:

“Behold, I will reveal unto you the Priesthood, by the hand of Elijah the prophet, before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the Lord.

“And he shall plant in the hearts of the children the promises made to the fathers, and the hearts of the children shall turn to their fathers.

“If it were not so, the whole earth would be utterly wasted at his coming.” (D&C 2:1-3.)

What priesthood was Elijah to reveal? John the Baptist restored the keys to the Aaronic Priesthood. Peter, James, and John restored the keys of the kingdom of God. Why send Elijah?

“Because he holds the keys of the authority to administer in all the ordinances of the priesthood,” or the sealing power. (Teachings, p. 172; italics added.) So said the Prophet Joseph Smith!

The Prophet Joseph said further that these keys [page 10] were “the revelations, ordinances, oracles, powers and endowments of the fulness of the Melchizedek Priesthood and of the kingdom of God on the earth.” (Teachings, p. 337; italics added.)

Even though the Aaronic Priesthood and Melchizedek Priesthood had been restored to the earth, the Lord urged the Saints to build a temple to receive the keys by which this order of priesthood could be administered on the earth again, “for there [was] not a place found on earth that he may come to and restore again that which was lost … even the fulness of the priesthood.” (D&C 124:28; italics added.)

Again the Prophet Joseph said: “If a man gets a fullness of the priesthood of God he has to get it in the same way that Jesus Christ obtained it, and that was by keeping all the commandments and obeying all the ordinances of the house of the Lord.” (Teachings, p. 308.)

So the Kirtland Temple was completed at great sacrifice to the Saints.

Then, on 3 April 1836, the Lord Jesus Christ and three other heavenly beings appeared in this holy edifice. One of these heavenly messengers was Elijah, to whom the Lord said he had “committed the keys of the power of turning the hearts of the fathers to the children, and the hearts of the children to the fathers, that the whole earth may not be smitten with a curse.” (D&C 27:9.)

Elijah brought the keys of sealing powers–that power which seals a man to a woman and seals their posterity to them endlessly, that which seals their forefathers to them all the way back to Adam. This is the power and order that Elijah revealed–that same order of priesthood which God gave to Adam and to all the ancient patriarchs which followed after him.

And this is why the Lord said to the Prophet Joseph Smith, “For verily I say unto you, the keys of the dispensation, which ye have received, have come down from the fathers, and last of all, being sent down from heaven unto you.” (D&C 112:32.)

In a later revelation the Lord explained:

“In the celestial glory there are three heavens or degrees;

“And in order to obtain the highest, a man must enter into this order of the priesthood [meaning the new and everlasting covenant of marriage];

“And if he does not, he cannot obtain it.

“He may enter into the other, but that is the end of his kingdom; he cannot have an increase.” (D&C 131:1-4; italics added.)

When our children obey the Lord and go to the temple to receive their blessings and enter into the marriage covenant, they enter into the same order of the priesthood that God instituted in the very beginning with father Adam.

This order entitles them to the same blessings of Abraham, of whom the Lord said that he “hath entered into his exaltation and sitteth upon his throne.” (D&C 132:29.)

Then He significantly added: “This promise is yours also, because ye are of Abraham.” (D&C 132:31.)

So again I emphasize: This order of priesthood can only be entered into when we comply with all the commandments of God and seek the blessings of the fathers as did Abraham by going to our Father’s house. They are received in no other place on this earth!

I hope you would teach this truth about the temple to your children and your grandchildren. Go to the temple–our Father’s house–to receive the blessings of your fathers that you may be entitled to the highest blessings of the priesthood. “For without this no man can see the face of God, even the Father, and live.” (D&C 84:22.)

Our Father’s house is a house of order. We go to His house to enter into that order of priesthood which will entitle us to all that the Father hath, if we are faithful. For as the Lord has revealed in modern times, Abraham’s seed are “lawful heirs” to the priesthood. (See D&C 86:8-11.)

Now let me say something else to all who can worthily go to the House of the Lord. When you attend the temple and perform the ordinances that pertain to the House of the Lord, certain blessings will come to you:

•You will receive the spirit of Elijah, which will turn your hearts to your spouse, to your children, and to your forebears.

•You will love your family with a deeper love than you have loved before.

•Your hearts will be turned to your fathers and theirs to you.

•You will be endowed with power from on high as the Lord has promised.

•You will receive the key of the knowledge of God. (See D&C 84:19.) You will learn how you can be like Him. Even the power of godliness will be manifest to you. (See D&C 84:20.)

•You will be doing a great service to those who have passed to the other side of the veil in order that they might be “judged according to men in the flesh, but live according to God in the spirit.” (D&C 138:34.)

Such are the blessings of the temple and the blessings of frequently attending the temple.

So I say at this centennial commemoration of the Logan Temple: God bless Israel! God bless those of our forebears who constructed this holy edifice. God bless us to teach our children and our grandchildren what great blessings await them by going to the temple. God bless us to receive all the blessings revealed by Elijah the prophet so that our callings and election will be made sure.

I testify with all my soul to the truth of this message and pray that the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob will bless modern Israel with the compelling desire to seek all the blessings of the fathers in the House of our Heavenly Father.

Enoch received the priesthood at age 25 while other received the priesthood at a much older age, he was 65 at the meeting at Adam ondi Ahman.  

 

Enoch’s people were of one heart and one mind, they dwelt in righteousness and they were translated.  Abraham wants to achieve what Enoch did.

 

(Abraham 1:1-2, 31)

 

1 In the land of the Chaldeans, at the residence of my fathers, I, Abraham, saw that it was needful for me to obtain another place of residence;

 

2 And, finding there was greater happiness and peace and rest for me, I sought for the blessings of the fathers, and the right whereunto I should be ordained to administer the same; having been myself a follower of righteousness, desiring also to be one who possessed great knowledge, and to be a greater follower of righteousness, and to possess a greater knowledge, and to be a father of many nations, a prince of peace, and desiring to receive instructions, and to keep the commandments of God, I became a rightful heir, a High Priest, holding the right belonging to the fathers.

 

31 But the records of the fathers, even the patriarchs, concerning the right of Priesthood, the Lord my God preserved in mine own hands; therefore a knowledge of the beginning of the creation, and also of the planets, and of the stars, as they were made known unto the fathers, have I kept even unto this day, and I shall endeavor to write some of these things upon this record, for the benefit of my posterity that shall come after me.

 

 

Abraham knew it was necessary to move because he needed to receive the blessings of the fathers (priesthood ordinances from Adam) and he wouldn’t receive them in Ur. 

 

Abraham wants the priesthood order and keys to pass on to his posterity.  Priesthood and temple ordinances go hand in hand.

 

Abraham wanted the temple or the greater ordinances but he knew it didn’t exist where he lived, so he had to leave to find them.

 

Ordain and Ordinances come from the root word ORDER

 

Records of the fathers = temple ordinances

 

D&C 84:33-42 – Oath and Covenant of the priesthood comes in 3 steps or stages:

 

  1. Priesthood is conferred upon an individual
  2. Endowment (Both men and women enter into specific covenants)
  3. Marriage Ordinance which we enter with our spouse and the Lord to create children

 

This is Priesthood Order, to be administered by Priesthood authority and directed by Priesthood keys.

 

D&C 107:41 – Lineage of Adam – The line went from Adam to Seth (after Abel’s death) who was ordained by Adam.  Priesthood is conferred upon someone (ordaining may mean something else).

 

Alma 13:1-2 – Ordained in a way to show how one is redeemed.  The offices of the priesthood are there to act in delegated positions in the priesthood.

 

Temple Endowment – Shows creation, fall, and redemption, we walk through it observing the path we must take.

 

Melchizedek priesthood holds the keys to perform ordinances that give the key to the knowledge of God.

The Key of the Knowledge of God

President James E. Faust
Second Counselor in the First Presidency

The key of the knowledge of God, administered by those who keep the oath and covenant of the Melchizedek Priesthood, will enable us to come off as the sons of God.

Brethren of the priesthood of God, I am again seated as I deliver my message this evening. As you are aware, I am working through a temporary back problem. Those of you who have had back trouble will understand. Those of you who haven’t—just wait a while! Any other explanation of what ails me is not true!

I humbly speak to you tonight with a prayer in my heart that you may understand me by the power of the Spirit. It is hard to imagine anything more important for us as priesthood holders to learn than the key of the knowledge of God. This evening I would like to speak concerning that key.

The greater priesthood administers the gospel and holds “the key of the mysteries of the kingdom, even the key of the knowledge of God.”1 What is the key of the knowledge of God, and can anyone obtain it? Without the priesthood there can be no fulness of the knowledge of God. The Prophet Joseph Smith said that the “Melchizedek Priesthood . . . is the channel through which all knowledge, doctrine, the plan of salvation and every important matter is revealed from heaven.”2 President Joseph F. Smith stated: “One who can truly affirm that Joseph Smith was a prophet of God, and Jesus is the Savior, has in his possession a prize beyond computation. When we know this we know God, and we have a key to all knowledge.”3

Father Abraham recognized the value of this grand key as he recounted his experience: “I sought for the blessings of the fathers, and the right whereunto I should be ordained to administer the same; having been myself a follower of righteousness, desiring also to be one who possessed great knowledge, and to be a greater follower of righteousness, and to possess a greater knowledge, . . . and desiring to receive instructions, and to keep the commandments of God, I became a rightful heir, a High Priest, holding the right belonging to the fathers.”4

Anyone who is righteous and desires to possess greater knowledge and to become “a greater follower of righteousness” can, under the authority of the priesthood, obtain a greater knowledge of God. The Lord tells us one clear way to do so, as given in the Doctrine and Covenants: “If thou shalt ask, thou shalt receive revelation upon revelation, knowledge upon knowledge, . . . that which bringeth joy, that which bringeth life eternal.”5

One might ask, “How do I become a greater follower of righteousness?” A righteous person is one who makes and keeps gospel covenants. These are holy contracts,6 usually between individuals and the Lord. Sometimes they include other persons, such as spouses. They involve most sacred promises and commitments, such as baptism, the conferral of the priesthood, temple blessings, marriage, and parenthood. Many of the blessings of Father Abraham come as the Holy Ghost is poured out upon all people.7 Any worthy man or woman who receives the Holy Ghost can actually become “a new creation.”8

To obtain the full portion of these supernal blessings and come to a full knowledge of God, a man must enter into and keep the oath and covenant of the priesthood.9 President Marion G. Romney insightfully pointed out:

“The only way a man can make the maximum progress towards eternal life, for which mortality is designed, is to obtain and magnify the Melchizedek Priesthood. . . . It is of utmost importance that we keep clearly in mind what the magnifying of our callings in the priesthood requires of us. . . . It requires at least the following three things:

“1. That we obtain a knowledge of the gospel.
“2. That we comply in our personal living with the standards of the gospel.
“3. That we give dedicated service.”10

Two covenants are to be made by each priesthood holder. The first is to be faithful unto the obtaining of the Aaronic and Melchizedek Priesthoods.11 The Aaronic Priesthood trains and prepares the priesthood holder for the greater duties of the Melchizedek Priesthood and prepares him to receive the blessings of the oath and covenant of the priesthood. Holding both the Aaronic and Melchizedek Priesthoods is essential to receive the full blessings that the Lord has for His faithful sons. The second covenant as His agent in this holy authority is to be faithful in magnifying one’s calling with total faith in God.12

As part of the oath and covenant of the priesthood, the Lord makes several promises to His faithful sons “which he cannot break.”13 First, the priesthood holders “are sanctified by the Spirit unto the renewing of their bodies.”14 I think President Hinckley is a great example of this. He has been renewed in body, mind, and spirit in a most remarkable manner. Second, “they become the sons of Moses and of Aaron and the seed of Abraham.”15 Third, they become “the elect of God.”16 As His agents, they carry forth this holy work in our time on the earth. Fourth, “all they who receive this priesthood receive [the Lord].”17 Fifth, those who receive the Lord’s servants receive Him.18 Sixth, those who receive the Savior receive God the Father.19 Seventh, they also receive the Father’s kingdom.20 Eighth, they also shall be given all that the Father hath.21 Those who receive all that the Father hath can receive nothing more.

You young men of the Aaronic Priesthood have been given great authority and responsibilities. Under the direction of the bishop, the Aaronic Priesthood functions in at least two ordinances that are directly related to the Atonement. One is the sacrament, which is in remembrance of the Savior’s blood shed for our sins and His body which He gave as a ransom for us.22 The second is baptism. Priests have authority to perform baptisms for the remission of sins. The Aaronic Priesthood is a very real power. One young man wrote this of his experience in exercising this power:

“At one time I attended a ward which had almost no Melchizedek Priesthood holders in it. But it was not in any way dulled in spirituality. On the contrary, many of its members witnessed the greatest display of priesthood power they had ever known.

“The power was centered in the priests. For the first time in their lives they were called upon to perform all the duties of the priests and administer to the needs of their fellow ward members. They were seriously called to home teach—not just to be a yawning appendage to an elder making a social call but to bless their brothers and sisters.

“Previous to this time I had been with four of these priests in a different situation. . . . They drove away every seminary teacher after two or three months. They spread havoc over the countryside on Scouting trips. But when they were needed—when they were trusted with a vital mission—they were among those who shone the most brilliantly in priesthood service.

“The secret was that the bishop called upon his Aaronic Priesthood to rise to the stature of men to whom angels might well appear; and they rose to that stature, administering relief to those who might be in want and strengthening those who needed strengthening. Not only were the other ward members built up but so were the members of the quorum themselves. A great unity spread throughout the ward and every member began to have a taste of what it is for a people to be of one mind and one heart. There was nothing inexplicable in all of this; it was just the proper exercise of the Aaronic Priesthood.”23

President Gordon B. Hinckley recently told the Aaronic Priesthood that those of you who live worthy lives can be blessed by the “protection of ministering angels” and that you “have something magnificent to live up to.”24

What does it mean to be the seed of Abraham? Scripturally it has a deeper meaning than being his literal descendants. The Lord made a covenant with Abraham, the great patriarch, that all nations would be blessed through him.25 Any man or woman can claim the blessings of Abraham. They become his seed and heirs to the promised blessings by accepting the gospel, being baptized, entering into temple marriage, being faithful in keeping their covenants, and helping to carry the gospel to all the nations of the earth.

To be empowered to “bear this ministry and Priesthood unto all nations,”26 a man must receive the Melchizedek Priesthood with its blessings. Then through faithfulness he becomes an heir to the fulness of eternal life. For as Paul said, “And if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.”27

As the seed of Abraham, we have some obligations. We are commanded to come to Christ by doing “the works of Abraham.”28 These works include obeying God, receiving and keeping priesthood and temple ordinances and covenants, preaching the gospel, building a family unit and teaching our children, and being faithful to the end.

It is interesting that the Lord used the word seed in His promise to Abraham. It has a fuller meaning than posterity because it means to multiply the blessings of the covenant of Abraham “unto all nations.”29 The Lord promised Abraham a posterity “as innumerable as the stars” or “the sand upon the seashore.”30

Abraham’s righteous posterity is also privileged to be adopted into the eternal family of Jesus Christ. This includes the right to receive eternal covenants in the temple by which, if they are worthy, they will be organized and exalted in the eternal family of Christ.31 It also includes “the blessings of salvation, even of life eternal.”32

The patriarchal order runs from Abraham to Isaac and to Jacob. Through the line of the priesthood it continues in our own day and time. Through the ages, blessings and promises were given from the fathers to their faithful sons. A modern example of this is taken from the life of Elder John B. Dickson of the Seventy. He recalls:

“When it was time for me to go on a mission, I was very excited to serve the Lord. Just before I was to leave, however, I found out that I had bone cancer. The chance of living long enough to serve a mission wasn’t very high. I had faith that the Lord would provide a way if He wanted me to go. My father gave me a blessing in which I was told that I would serve my mission in Mexico , serve in the Church all my life, and have a family. My right arm had to be amputated above the elbow, but my life was spared, and the promises I was given have all been fulfilled.

“Some would think that losing an arm would be a terrible burden, but it has been one of the greatest blessings in my life. I learned that it is very important to have challenges and to face up to them.”

Elder Dickson had always been right-handed, and now he had to learn to do everything left-handed. One struggle was learning how to tie his ties. He said: “One Sunday morning when I was in my bedroom with my tie in my hand, I thought, How am I going to tie this? I thought about getting a clip-on tie. I thought about asking Mom to help me. But I couldn’t take her with me on my mission just to tie my ties. So I decided I had to learn how to do it myself. I finally figured it out by using my teeth. I still do it that way, even after having tied it thousands of times.”33

We don’t know in detail all that is going to be required of humanity, of the Saints of God in the uncertain days ahead. Everyday righteous living will be increasingly difficult. In addition, holders of the priesthood may well have to meet some extra challenges in safeguarding and providing for their families. As one world leader recently pointed out, there will be “dangers common to us all. Today’s deadly threats come from rogue powers and stateless networks of extremists who have nothing but contempt for the sanctity of human life and for the principles civilized nations hold dear.”34

We can all expect to face trials. But great eternal promises are extended to those who persist in righteousness. The Lord has given His word that “any man that shall . . . fail not to continue faithful in all things, shall not be weary in mind, neither darkened, neither in body, limb, nor joint. . . .  And they shall not go hungry, neither athirst.”35 I am optimistic about what the future holds for the Lord’s Church and its members, but we will have to persist in righteousness and be “faithful in all things.”36 The key of the knowledge of God, administered by those who keep the oath and covenant of the Melchizedek Priesthood, will enable us to come off as the sons of God. That we will do so, I pray humbly in the name of Jesus Christ, amen.

Righteous = Right with the law, makes and keeps gospel covenants. 

Obedience and sacrifice >>> Build the kingdom

 

Hebrews 11 – Abraham is the classic example of faith

 

 

 

President J. Reuben Clark Jr.

 

First Counselor in the First Presidency

 

My brethren: I am more grateful than I can say for the privilege which I have tonight to say something to you. The Lord has been good to me far beyond any desert I know about. I am grateful for your prayers and the prayers of my Brethren who have brought this to pass.

 

As I stand before you tonight to say a few words (and they are going to be few, because I feel that the people of the Church wish to hear the President of the Church and I do not like to see the hour pass and have our friends who are not here, not hear him say all he would like to say), we are all bearers of the Priesthood, we who are here and the tens of thousands who are assembling in other places to hear what is said here.

 

Brethren, I refer again and for a moment only, to what the influence, the power of this Church would be, if we were united as one man. Then we might meet the principle announced in the Prayer of the Great High Priest in the Garden, when He prayed that the Disciples might be one, even as He and the Father were one, and as He declared in modern revelation: “I say unto you be one, and if ye are not one ye are not mine.” (John 17:21; D&C 38:27.)

 

I am told that Brother Matt Cowley once voiced this idea: He said something of this sort, “You know, I am so busy trying to understand the first principles of the Gospel that I have no time for the mysteries.”

 

As I have thought about what I might say in the few minutes I shall be with you here at the stand, I have thought I would like to say just a little bit about the Priesthood itself. We are all bearers of it, the Holy Priesthood after the Order of the Son of God.

What is this Priesthood that we have? We have had our definitions. I will come to them, if I may, just a few minutes later. But I have thought that I would like to look first somewhat at the work of our Savior. His work was performed through faith. If you will examine a little bit carefully His life, you will find that in His miracles He performed many of the great functions of creation. He worked, I repeat, by the power of the Priesthood.

 

You will remember that He walked upon the water, thus defying and overruling, so far as we can see, the principle of gravity. You will remember that Peter asked to be bidden to come to Him. Peter being so bidden, got out of the boat and walked a short distance on the water and then becoming fearful, he began to sink and called to the Lord for help, and the Lord said to him, “O thou of little faith. . . .”

 

You will remember that on one occasion He was on the Sea of Galilee and a violent storm came up, so much so that those who were with Him feared for the sinking of the ship. They awakened Him and appealed to Him and He stilled the tempest, having power over the forces that were involved in that. You will recall that He fed a multitude with a few loaves and a few fishes, five thousand on one occasion, four thousand on another. You will recall that He also provided miraculous drought of fish on two or three occasions. The whole world was under him

 

You will recall that He cursed the barren fig tree. You will recall that He raised the dead to life again. Think of what was involved in that.

 

You will recall His thousands, almost (so far as we know), of healings of all sorts of diseases. These were manifestations of the power of faith. Sometimes it seems the faith was partially exercised by those whom He healed, as when the woman touched the border of His garment and was healed of an issue of blood. At other times it seemed as if the faith came from Himself. Think of the blessing of faith exercised through the Priesthood.

 

On more than one occasion, He said: “If ye have faith as a grain of mustard seed. . . .” (Secs. 103, 140.) The commentators, I may add, make no explanation of this. The only statement I have found about that statement,-faith is as a grain of mustard seed-is that the mustard seed is one of the smallest of seeds. And that was followed by, “. . . ye shall say unto this mountain, Remove hence to yonder place; and it shall remove.” (Secs. 103, 163a.) And the commentators, who do not understand nor, apparently, believe in faith, say that this merely was an exaggerated imagery of the East; and that the expression “remove mountains” was common among Jewish preachers as indicating the impressiveness with which a man might speak, and referred only to difficulty. It is my judgment, my belief, my testimony, that the possible removal of a mountain is a sober statement of fact.

 

He told them at one time that if they had the faith, if they believed, they could say to a sycamine tree, “Be thou plucked up by the root, and be thou planted in the sea,” and it would be done. (Sec. 140.) I believe that. I believe that is literally true.

We have been given that Priesthood which carries in it this great power of faith. It has been given to us, you, me, and all who are listening in of the brethren holding the Priesthood.

 

What about it? Paul said . . . faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.” (Heb. 11:1, I.V.) I have never been able quite to understand that, but I can understand what has been said either by the Prophet Joseph or with his approval, found in the old “Lectures on Faith” in the Doctrine and Covenants. He said:

 

“By this we understand that the principle of power which existed in the bosom of God, by which the worlds were framed, was faith; and that it is by reason of this principle of power existing in the Deity, that all created things exist; so that all things in heaven on earth, or under the earth, exist by reason of faith as it existed in Him.” (Lectures on Faith, 1:15.)

As I think about faith, this principle of power, I am obliged to believe that it is an intelligent force. Of what kind I do not know. But it is superior to and overrules all other forces of which we know. It is the principle, the force, by which the dead are restored to life.

 

I do not believe that the Lord, that God permits any man to have faith that would overrule His purposes. In that connection, I call to your attention the fact that the Savior, Himself, plead that His crucifixion might be turned aside. Yet, on one occasion He said, when He asked that the hour might be passed on, “. . . but for this cause came I unto this hour.” The Son of God was not given the necessary faith at that time to enable Him to turn aside the purposes reached by Himself and the Father before and still remembered by the Father. I repeat, I think that the Lord never gives faith to any individual to enable him to overturn the purposes of His will. Always we are subject to what He wishes.

 

I think that we should never administer to the sick, we should never pray particularly when we pray for specific things, that we do not repeat and present to the Lord, even as Christ prayed in the Garden, “Nevertheless, not my will, but thine, be done.”

You brethren, we brethren, have had this great power given unto us, this power of faith. What are we doing about it? Can you, can we, do the mighty things that the Savior did? Yes. They have been done by the members of the Church who had the faith and the righteousness so to do. Think of what is within your power if you but live the Gospel, if you but live so that you may invoke the power which is within you.

 

And I would like to add this as a sobering thought to myself and to you each of you, and all of you: Remember the parable of the talents where the man who failed to improve the talent given him, had it taken from him? I ask you brethren, and myself, are we magnifying our Priesthood in such a way, are we living close enough to the Lord and in obedience to His commandments that we may exercise this power, or shall it be wholly or in part taken away from us? You would better think about it. It is worth thinking about. It is the greatest power that has been revealed to man.

God grant that we may all so live that we shall not lose that power, but that always it shall be available to us.

 

Bearing my testimony again that God lives, that Jesus is the Christ, that Joseph was the instrument, along with his associates, in the re-establishing of the Church, that all of the rights, powers, and privileges that were lodged in the Prophet have descended to our present President and are enjoyed by him, I bear this testimony and I ask these blessings in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ. Amen.

 

(President J. Reuben Clark, Jr., Conference Report, April 1960, First Day General Priesthood Meeting, p.20-22)

 

 

Faith is an intelligent force controlled by God, (His control makes it intelligent).  Faith is not an abstract concept.   

 

Faith as controlled by God which man may learn to control if man is centered on Christ.                       

 

Faith is God’s power; we must have absolute confidence in it even though it cannot be seen.  This requires knowledge; it also requires revelation even though we cannot see the outcome beforehand.  An example is electricity, we can see its effects, we have confidence in it yet it is not mine, someone else has harnessed it and I have the right to use it. 

 

With faith mountains can be moved and rivers parted.  Faith has been harnessed by God and given power to man to build up the kingdom.

 

Priesthood = Power = Faith in all things

 

 

The Doctrine of the Priesthood

Elder Bruce R. McConkie

Of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles

 

 

My brethren of the priesthood: To all of you, to all holders of the Aaronic and Melchizedek Priesthoods, I issue this challenge: Come, learn the doctrine of the priesthood; come, live as befits one who is a servant of the Lord.

 

This doctrine, this doctrine of the priesthood unknown in the world and but little known even in the Church cannot be learned out of the scriptures alone. It is not set forth in the sermons and teachings of the prophets and Apostles, except in small measure.

 

The doctrine of the priesthood is known only by personal revelation. It comes, line upon line and precept upon precept, by the power of the Holy Ghost to those who love and serve God with all their heart, might, mind, and strength. (See D&C 98:12.)

 

We have the revealed promise that if our souls are full of charity towards all men, and to the household of faith and if we let virtue garnish [our] thoughts unceasingly; then shall [our] confidence wax strong in the presence of God; and the doctrine of the priesthood shall distil upon [our souls] as the dews from heaven. (D&C 121:45.)

 

I have wondered and pondered and prayed about how best to proclaim the doctrine of the priesthood.

 

I have thought, if I could but speak with the voice of seven thunders or send forth the word by ten thousand trumpets, then men would hear the message.

 

But I remember how Alma wished that he might go forth and speak with the trump of God, with a voice to shake the earth, as he cried repentance unto every people. (See Alma 29:1.)

 

And I know that the Lord does not work in this way. His word goes forth by the mouths of his servants as they minister and labor in their weakness. That word is then carried into receptive hearts by the still small voice of the Spirit. (See D&C 85:6.)

How else than by the power of the Spirit can any of us ever understand spiritual truths? How does one describe an infinite God in finite terms?

 

Can our voices, as weak and distant earthly echoes, recapture the glory and power of the Eternal Voice that speaks in heaven? Can man in his weakness and frailty portray God in his power and might?

 

Knowing our limitations, let us then reason together, and perhaps we can at least glimpse the wonders of that power by which the worlds were made. Perhaps we can see how and in what manner we as mortals may use this same power to bless our fellows and save ourselves.

 

What, then, is the doctrine of the priesthood? What is this doctrine, framed in the courts above, which can distil upon faithful men as the dews from heaven? (See D&C 121:45.)

 

Priesthood is power like none other on earth or in heaven. It is the very power of God himself, the power by which the worlds were made, the power by which all things are regulated, upheld, and preserved.

 

It is the power of faith, the faith by which the Father creates and governs. God is God because he is the embodiment of all faith and all power and all priesthood. The life he lives is named eternal life.

 

And the extent to which we become like him is the extent to which we gain his faith, acquire his power, and exercise his priesthood. And when we have become like him in the full and true sense, then we also shall have eternal life.

 

Faith and priesthood go hand in hand. Faith is power and power is priesthood. After we gain faith, we receive the priesthood. Then, through the priesthood, we grow in faith until, having all power, we become like our Lord.

 

Our time here in mortality is set apart as a time of probation and of testing. It is our privilege while here to perfect our faith and to grow in priesthood power.

 

We received the priesthood first in the premortal existence and then again as mortals. Adam held the keys and used the priesthood when he participated in the creation of the earth. After his baptism he received the priesthood again, and he now stands as the presiding High Priest over all the earth.

 

All of us who have calls to minister in the holy priesthood were foreordained to be ministers of Christ, and to come here in our appointed days, and to labor on his errand.

 

The holy priesthood did more to perfect men in the days of Enoch than at any other time. Known then as the order of Enoch (see D&C 76:57), it was the power by which he and his people were translated. And they were translated because they had faith and exercised the power of the priesthood.

 

It was with Enoch that the Lord made an eternal covenant that all who received the priesthood would have power, through faith, to govern and control all things on earth, to put at defiance the armies of nations, and to stand in glory and exaltation before the Lord.

 

Melchizedek was a man of like faith, and his people wrought righteousness, and obtained heaven, and sought for the city of Enoch. (JST, Gen. 14:34.) Since his day the priesthood has been called after his name.

 

There are in the Church two priesthoods: the Aaronic or Levitical, and the Melchizedek. The Aaronic Priesthood is a preparatory priesthood, a schooling priesthood, a lesser priesthood, a divine system that prepares men to receive the Melchizedek Priesthood.

 

The Melchizedek Priesthood is the highest and holiest order ever given to men on earth. It is the power and authority to do all that is necessary to save and exalt the children of men. It is the very priesthood held by the Lord Jesus Christ himself and by virtue of which he was able to gain eternal life in the kingdom of his Father.

 

Both of these priesthoods are given by covenant. (See D&C 84:33-41.) Both of them surpass any earthly power; both of them prepare men for salvation.

 

Those who receive the Aaronic Priesthood covenant and promise to magnify their callings, to serve in the ministry of the Master, to forsake the world, and to live as becometh Saints.

 

In return, the Lord covenants and promises to enlarge the standing and station of all who keep their Aaronic covenant. He promises to give them the Melchizedek Priesthood, out of which eternal life comes.

 

Those who receive the Melchizedek Priesthood covenant and promise, before God and angels, to magnify their callings, to live by every word that proceedeth forth from the mouth of God (D&C 84:44), to marry for time and all eternity in the patriarchal order, and to live and serve as the Lord Jesus did in his life and ministry.

 

In return the Lord covenants and promises to give them all that his Father hath, meaning eternal life, which is exaltation and godhood in that eternal realm where alone the family unit continues in eternity.

 

In return the Lord admits them to his eternal patriarchal order, an order that prevails in the highest heaven of the celestial world, an order that assures its members of eternal increase, or in other words of spirit children in the resurrection. (See D&C 131:1-4.)

 

These are the most glorious promises given to men. There neither is nor can be anything as wondrous and great. And so the Lord uses the most powerful and emphatic language known to the human tongue to show their importance and immutability. That is to say, the Lord swears with an oath in his own name, because he can swear by no greater, that everyone who keeps the covenant made in connection with the Melchizedek Priesthood shall inherit, receive, and possess all things in his everlasting kingdom, and shall be a joint-heir with that Lord who is his Only Begotten.

 

God swore with an oath that Christ would be exalted, and he swears anew, at the time each of us receives the Melchizedek Priesthood, that we will have a like exaltation if we are true and faithful in all things.

 

Speaking messianically of the Lord Jesus, David said, The Lord hath sworn, and will not repent, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchizedek. (Ps. 110:4.)

 

And Paul, after quoting this messianic word, this eternal oath sworn by God himself, said that Christ was called of God an high priest after the order of Melchisedec. (Heb. 5:10.)

 

Then of Melchizedek, to whom Abraham paid tithes, Paul said, For this Melchizedek was ordained a priest after the order of the Son of God, which order was without father, without mother, without descent, having neither beginning of days, nor end of life. (JST, Heb. 7:3.)

 

Anciently the Aaronic Priesthood was limited to the Levites. It came because of father and mother; it was conferred only upon the worthy male descendants of Levi. But the Melchizedek Priesthood was to be conferred upon any male person of any lineage who was worthy to receive it.

 

And so Paul continued, And all those who are ordained unto this [higher] priesthood are made like unto the Son of God, abiding a priest continually. (JST, Heb. 7:3.)

 

Christ is the prototype; he is the Son; he is the Heir of the Father. But we, as joint-heirs, inherit equally with him because we also abide as priests forever.

Thus we make the covenant with Deity; and God swears the oath to us all, to show the importance and eternal worth of the covenant.

 

This matter of swearing with an oath in ancient days was far more significant than many of us have realized.

For instance: Nephi and his brethren were seeking to obtain the brass plates from Laban. Their lives were in peril. Yet Nephi swore this oath: As the Lord liveth, and as we live, we will not go down unto our father in the wilderness until we have accomplished the thing which the Lord hath commanded us. (1 Ne. 3:15.)

 

Thus Nephi made God his partner. If he failed to get the plates, it meant God had failed. And because God does not fail, it was incumbent upon Nephi to get the plates or lay down his life in the attempt.

 

One of the most solemn oaths ever given to man is found in these words of the Lord relative to Joseph Smith and the Book of Mormon. He [meaning Joseph Smith] has translated the book, even that part which I have commanded him, saith the Lord, and as your Lord and your God liveth it is true. (D&C 17:6.)

 

This is Gods testimony of the Book of Mormon. In it Deity himself has laid his godhood on the line. Either the book is true or God ceases to be God. There neither is nor can be any more formal or powerful language known to men or gods.

 

And so it is with the Melchizedek Priesthood. As the Lord lives, it is his holy order, and all those priesthood holders of every nation and kindred and tongue and people and race and color who will keep the covenant shall abide as priests forever, ruling and reigning everlastingly with the great High Priest of our profession, who is the Lord Jesus Christ.

 

What, then, is the doctrine of the priesthood? And how shall we live as the servants of the Lord?

 

This doctrine is that God our Father is a glorified, a perfected, and an exalted being who has all might, all power, and all dominion, who knows all things and is infinite in all his attributes, and who lives in the family unit.

 

It is that our Eternal Father enjoys this high status of glory and perfection and power because his faith is perfect and his priesthood is unlimited.

 

It is that priesthood is the very name of the power of God, and that if we are to become like him, we must receive and exercise his priesthood or power as he exercises it

.

It is that he has given us an endowment of heavenly power here on earth, which is after the order of his Son and which, because it is the power of God, is of necessity without beginning of days or end of years.

 

It is that we can enter an order of the priesthood named the new and everlasting covenant of marriage (see D&C 131:2), named also the patriarchal order, because of which order we can create for ourselves eternal family units of our own, patterned after the family of God our Heavenly Father.

 

It is that we have power, by faith, to govern and control all things, both temporal and spiritual; to work miracles and perfect lives; to stand in the presence of God and be like him because we have gained his faith, his perfections, and his power, or in other words the fulness of his priesthood.

 

This, then, is the doctrine of the priesthood, than which there neither is nor can be anything greater. This is the power we can gain through faith and righteousness.

 

Truly, there is power in the priesthood power to do all things!

 

If the world itself was created by the power of the priesthood, surely that same power can move mountains and control the elements.

If one-third of the hosts of heaven were cast down to earth by the power of the priesthood, surely that same power can put at defiance the armies of nations or stay the fall of atomic bombs.

 

If all men shall be raised from mortality to immortality by the power of the priesthood, surely that same power can cure the diseased and the dying and raise the dead.

 

Truly there is power in the priesthood a power which we seek to acquire to use; a power which we devoutly pray may rest upon us and upon our posterity forever.

 

In the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, amen.

 

(Elder Bruce R. McConkie, The Doctrine of the Priesthood, Ensign (CR), May 1982, p.32)

 

 

(JST Hebrews 11:1-9.)

 

 Now faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.

 

 2 For by it the elders obtained a good report.

 

3 Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear.

 

4 By faith Abel offered unto God a more excellent sacrifice than Cain, by which he obtained witness that he was righteous, God testifying of his gifts; and by it he being dead yet speaketh.

 

5 By faith Enoch was translated that he should not see death; and was not found, because God had translated him; for before his translation he had this testimony, that he pleased God.

 

6 But without faith it is impossible to please him; for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.

 

7 By faith Noah, being warned of God of things not seen as yet, moved with fear, prepared an ark to the saving of his house; by the which he condemned the world, and became heir of the righteousness which is by faith.

 

8 By faith Abraham, when he was called to go out into a place which he should after receive for an inheritance, obeyed; and he went out, not knowing whither he went.

 

9 By faith he sojourned in the land of promise, as in a strange country, dwelling in tabernacles with Isaac and Jacob, the heirs with him of the same promise;

 

10 For he looked for a city which hath foundations, whose builder and maker is God.

 

11 Through faith also Sarah herself received strength to conceive seed, and was delivered of a child when she was past age, because she judged him faithful who had promised.

 

Verses 1, 3 – Worlds were framed by the word of God through faith. 

 

Verse 5 – Enoch was translated, translation is an ordinance.

 

Verse 8 – By faith Abraham received revelation to go to a promised land (though he didn’t know where it was) to receive an inheritance.  He obeyed because of his absolute confidence in something he could not see combined with action that was in absolute conformity to the will of God.

 

When faith is exercised you receive the power of God.

 

Verses 9-10 – Abraham wants a city like Enoch’s (Melchizedek’s city, JST Genesis 14:25-40)

 

Verse 11 – Sarah also had faith to conceive, her faith was in harmony to the will of God.  When the 3 men came to Abraham and Sarah and told that she would have a child, she needed to act on that faith. 

 

Faith is a gift of God that comes from God’s power and revelation.

 

(JST Hebrews 11:12-19)

 

12 Therefore sprang there even of one, and him as good as dead, as many as the stars of the sky in multitude, and as the sand which is by the seashore innumerable.

 

13 These all died in faith, not having received the promises, but having seen them afar off, and were persuaded of them, and embraced them, and confessed that they were strangers and pilgrims on the earth.

 

14 For they that say such things declare plainly that they seek a country.

 

15 And truly, if they had been mindful of that country from whence they came out, they might have had opportunity to have returned.

 

16 But now they desire a better country, that is, a heavenly; wherefore God is not ashamed to be called their God; for he hath prepared for them a city.

 

17 By faith Abraham, when he was tried, offered up Isaac; and he that had received the promises offered up his only begotten son,

 

18 Of whom it was said, That in Isaac shall thy seed be called;

 

19 Accounting that God was able to raise him up, even from the dead; from whence also he received him in a figure.

 

 

Abraham's Test

 

Even as Abraham! Concerning Abraham's test, the biblical record says simply: "God did tempt [the JST says 'try' instead of 'tempt'] Abraham, and said unto him, Abraham: and he said, Behold, here I am. And he said, Take now thy son, thine only son Isaac, whom thou lovest, and get thee into the land of Moriah; and offer him there for a burnt offering upon one of the mountains which I will tell thee of." (Gen. 22:1-2.) What is not discussed at that point in the record is the seeming incongruities, even contradictions, that Abraham must have faced when he received that command.

 

First, consider the matter of human sacrifice. Abraham, as a young man, had been saved by the Lord from being offered as a sacrifice himself at the hands of an apostate priesthood who worshiped false gods. These idol worshipers offered to their gods "men, women, and children," specifically those who "would not bow down to worship gods of wood or of stone." (Abr. 1:8-11.) The Lord had told Abraham to leave the area because of those evil practices (Abr. 1:14) and go to a strange land that would eventually belong to his descendants (Abr. 1:16-18; 2:6). Now he was being asked to offer a human sacrifice—a hard thing to reconcile. Further, God had made it clear to Abraham on several occasions that it was through Isaac the blessings of the covenant were to come to Abraham and to the whole world. Those blessings are the heart and soul of bringing salvation to the children of men, for the promise was that the seed of Abraham, through Isaac, would be scattered among and bless "all the families of the earth." (See Abr. 2:8-11.) How could that promise be fulfilled if Isaac were killed? Besides, Abraham loved Isaac dearly. After all, he had waited anxiously for Isaac to be born for at least twenty-five years from the time the Lord first promised him an heir. fn That wait alone would be an Abrahamic test for many. And this long wait troubled Abraham. Several years after the promise of a son at Haran, after Abraham had traveled from Haran, through Canaan, to Egypt, and back to Canaan, and still no child, Abraham asked the Lord for an explanation. He even proposed that perhaps a child born "in my house," meaning a child of one of his servants, could become his heir. Without any details about how or when, the Lord simply reaffirmed the original promise of literal seed:

 

"Fear not, Abram: I am thy shield, and thy exceeding great reward. And Abram said, Lord God, what wilt thou give me, seeing I go childless, and the steward of my house is this Eliezer of Damascus? And Abram said, Behold, to me thou hast given no seed: and, lo, one born in my house is mine heir. And, behold, the word of the Lord came unto him, saying, This shall not be thine heir; but he that shall come forth out of thine own bowels shall be thine heir. And he brought him forth abroad, and said, Look now toward heaven, and tell the stars, if thou be able to number them: and he said unto him, So shall thy seed be." (Gen. 15:1-5.)

 

To Abraham's credit, "he believed in the Lord; and he counted it to him for righteousness." (Gen. 15:6.) More time passed. Sarai gave Hagar to Abraham, and Ishmael was born. Thirteen more years passed. Abraham was now ninety-nine years old, and Sarai was eighty-nine.

 

"And God said unto Abraham, As for Sarai thy wife, thou shalt not call her name Sarai, but Sarah shall her name be. And I will bless her, and give thee a son also of her: yea, I will bless her, and she shall be a mother of nations; kings of people shall be of her. Then Abraham fell upon his face, and laughed [the JST says "rejoiced"], and said in his heart, Shall a child be born unto him that is an hundred years old? and shall Sarah, that is ninety years old bear? And Abraham said unto God, O that Ishmael might live before thee! And God said, Sarah thy wife shall bear thee a son indeed; and thou shalt call his name Isaac: and I will establish my covenant with him for an everlasting covenant, and with his seed after him." (Gen. 17:15-19.)

 

When Sarah heard the news, she "laughed within herself," realizing that both she and Abraham were "old and well stricken in age; and it ceased to be with [her] after the manner of women." (Gen. 18:11.) I suspect most of us can empathize with Sarah's reaction. But the Lord's response was sobering—"Is anything too hard for the Lord? At the time appointed I will return unto thee, according to the time of life, and Sarah shall have a son." (Gen. 18:12-14.) "At the set time of which God had spoken" Isaac was born. (Gen. 21:2.)

 

Can you imagine the joy that Abraham and Sarah must have felt—joy accompanied by deep gratitude and an undeniable realization of the power of God and the surety of his promises. They had waited for such a long time, yearning and praying and living righteously. The blessing had finally come. Surely now all would go smoothly. In their old age they could quietly witness the continued fulfillment of God's promises through Isaac. Or could they? First came family problems: Ishmael mocked Isaac and concern grew over who would be Abraham's heir. Hagar and Ishmael were sent away to be cared for by the Lord. Shortly thereafter came the unthinkable requirement: offer Isaac as a sacrifice!

 

Now, keeping in mind the historical events we have reviewed, try to put yourself in Abraham's place for a moment. How might you have reacted? I can feel myself wanting to say "No. It can't be. Human sacrifice is an abomination. All the blessings of the covenant are to come through Isaac. This doesn't make any sense to me. I have been obedient. I have been patient. And besides all that, I love him with all my heart. I don't want him to die. This is too painful. Why does it have to be this way?" For some reason it did have to be that way, with all its seeming incongruities and inconsistencies. And it was painful for Abraham. Joseph Smith taught that "if God had known any other way whereby he could have touched Abraham's feelings more acutely and more keenly he would have done so." fn

 

In spite of the hurt, Abraham passed his test. The Genesis account does not describe Abraham's thoughts or feelings or questions. It matter-of-factly says: "And Abraham rose up early in the morning . . . and went unto the place of which God had told him." (Gen. 22:3.) But the apostle Paul bears witness of Abraham's profound faith in God: "By faith Abraham, when he was tried, offered up Isaac: and he that had received the promises offered up his only begotten son, Of whom it was said, That in Isaac shall thy seed be called: accounting that God was able to raise him up, even from the dead; from whence also he received him in a figure." (Heb. 11:17-19.)

 

In spite of the mind-boggling contradictions of the situation, Abraham had faith to proceed. He had full confidence that somehow God could and would fulfill all his promises, even though the one through whom the promises were to come was bound on an altar and Abraham's knife was raised to slay him. It was not until the last, precarious moment that the Lord stopped Abraham, saying, "Abraham, Abraham: . . . Lay not thine hand upon the lad, neither do thou anything unto him; for I know that thou fearest God, seeing thou hast not withheld thy son, thine only son from me." (Gen. 22:11-12.) What faith! What discipline! What a sterling example! No wonder Abraham is held up as the model.

 

Our Tests

 

What about us? How are we to be tested "even as Abraham?" Being asked to offer a child as a sacrifice just does not relate to our time and circumstance. But wrenching heart strings does relate—to all times and circumstances. And there are many ways to wrench the heart in any age: being asked to choose God over other things we dearly love, even when those things are good and have been promised, and when we have worked for them, yearned for them, prayed for them, and have been obedient and patient; or being asked to persevere in righteousness and service (perhaps even Church service) in the face of terrible difficulty, uncertainty, inequities, ironies, and even contradictions; or watching helplessly as the innocent suffer from the brutal misuse of God-given agency in the hands of evil men.

 

We should remember that not all the difficulties that try the souls of men are specially designed Abrahamic tests from God. Most, in fact, are the inevitable consequences of living in a mortal, fallen world, where natural law and agency, for the most part, are allowed full sway. It is true that such conditions come from God in the sense that he created the earth and that the conditions here are allowed by him, even designed by him to be a universal, probationary testing ground for his children. Everyone experiences bumps in the road of life, which expose weaknesses and strengths, giving opportunity for self-understanding, growth, and refinement. We are not wise enough to sort out all the factors that contribute to our challenges in this life. The critical issue is not the source of the challenges, anyway. The critical issue is how we respond to them. We can lose our focus and our progress if we constantly examine every bump in the road to determine whose fault it is.

 

The same principle applies to anticipating tests. It is self-defeating to spoil the present by worrying incessantly about the "big test" that will someday come. And it just may be that the "big test" will be very different from what we expect. It is enough to know that God will try us—in his own time, and in his own way, and that the very best way to prepare for that eventuality is by faithfully dealing with present tasks.

 

It appears that in addition to the general trials of life that all people face, those who claim to be the people of the Lord are faced with special challenges both collectively and individually.

 

 

(Richard D. Draper, ed., A Witness of Jesus Christ: The 1989 Sperry Symposium on the Old Testament [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1990], 54.)

 

 

Abraham had absolute confidence that after Isaac was sacrificed God would raise him from the dead so Isaac could bring to both the posterity promised to Abraham.

 

If you haven’t faith to sacrifice for the work of the Lord, if you have doubts about the possibility of one being raised from the dead, will you stand aside and witness the workings of the faith of Father Abraham. His faith was so great that even though he was commanded to sacrifice the life of his son Isaac, through whom only he could realize the promise of great posterity, he confidently prepared for the sacrifice with full faith that Isaac could even be raised from the dead, if necessary, to fulfill the promise of posterity.

 

(Harold B. Lee, Decisions for Successful Living [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1973], 80 – 81.)

 

The offering of Isaac didn’t make sense when God promised and made a covenant with Abraham about his future posterity.  But Abraham was willing to carry it out, FAITH.

 

Hebrews 11:13 – Abraham and Sarah died in the faith they didn’t receive the promises in mortality, they saw them from afar.  Example:  we get up in the morning and build the kingdom because we have faith to receive the Celestial kingdom in the next life.

 

Faith is not what we generate.  It is a gift from God through personal revelation.  We realize this by line upon line revelation.  Until we know what to pray for and that it is in conformity with God.  We need practice to learn how to discern.

 

God walks with us through the process.  Like Abraham sacrificing Isaac, he knew by revelation what to do, he had complete faith that God knew what He was doing and therefore he obeyed the command to sacrifice Isaac.

 

Why Was Abraham Commanded to Sacrifice Isaac?

 

In all history there is scarcely a more soul-wrenching moment than that on Mount Moriah nearly 4000 years ago when faithful Abraham, at God’s command, raised his knife to slay Isaac, “his only begotten son.” (Gen 22:1-19.) Who can conceive of a more severe test of faith than the heaven-sent order to sacrifice the heir of promise, the heir whom God must then raise from the dead that his promises concerning Isaac might be fulfilled. (Gen. 21:12.) Is it any wonder that in all succeeding generations the seed of Abraham have looked back with awe and reverence upon a scene which tested mortal man almost beyond mortal power to obey?

 

Why did Deity devise such a test? Certainly it was for Abraham’s blessing and benefit. There can be no question that the harder the test, the higher the reward for passing it. And here Abraham laid his all on the altar, thus proving himself worthy of that exaltation which he has now received. (D. & C. 132:29.) And immediately following his conformity to the divine will, he received a heavenly manifestation of the glory and honor reserved for him and his seed. (Gen. 22:15-18.)

 

Certainly, also, Abraham’s willingness to sacrifice Isaac was intended to be an example forever of that perfect obedience which the Lord expects of all the heirs of promise. “Abraham,” the Lord said to Joseph Smith, “was commanded to offer his son Isaac; nevertheless, it was written: Thou shalt not kill. Abraham, however, did not refuse, and it was accounted unto him for righteousness.” (D. & C. 132:36.) And in principle, the Lord tests and tries all his saints to see if they “will abide in” his “covenant, even unto death,” that they “may be found worthy.” (D. & C. 98:14.) “They must needs be chastened and tried, even as Abraham, who was commanded to offer up his only son. For all those who will not endure chastening, but deny me, cannot be sanctified.” (D. & C. 101:4-5.) And for those whose sacrifices are acceptable, the Lord provides an escape, a ram in the thicket, so that they and their righteous works are preserved. (Gen. 22:13; D. & C. 132:50.)

 

But in Abraham’s case the Lord did something more than provide a supreme test of faith by which the Father of the Faithful was able to sanctify his soul; he did more than create an example of perfect faith and obedience. In addition he established a “figure,” a “similitude,” to typify the future sacrifice of his Only Begotten Son. As Jacob expressed it, “Abraham” was “obedient unto the commands of God in offering up his son Isaac, which is a similitude of God and his Only Begotten Son.” (Jacob 4:5.) And thus for all generations of time whenever men think of Abraham’s test on Mount Moriah, they think also that God himself gave his Only Begotten Son as an infinite and eternal sacrifice for the sins of the world.

 

Sacrifice] See Commentary II, pp. 537-540.

 

17. The promises] See Heb. 11:8-16.

 

His only begotten son] Isaac. Abraham in fact was the father of Ishmael by Hagar the bondwoman, but Isaac was the only son in the royal lineage, the lineage through which the promises were to come. (Gen. 16; 21:1-21.)

 

19. Even as God would yet raise his Only Begotten Son from death to glorious immortality, so Abraham knew that if he slew Isaac at the Lord’s command, that same God would have to raise Isaac again to mortal life that the promise might be fulfilled: “In Isaac shall thy seed be called.” (Gen 21:12.)

 

 

(Bruce R. McConkie, Doctrinal New Testament Commentary, 3 vols. [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1965-1973], 3: 207.)

 

 

Nephi and his brothers trying to get the plates from Laban, they acted on their own 2 times and failed, finally Nephi listened to the Spirit and was led to act in absolute conformity to God’s will.

 

Faith is absolute conformity directed by the Spirit, reading what we are seeking for in the scriptures.

 

General Conformity – Reading the scriptures because it is obedient

                                 Doing Visiting Teaching

 

Absolute Conformity – Directed by the Spirit while doing Visiting Teaching

 

Matthew 17:14-21 – The Apostles come to Christ wondering why they couldn’t heal the young boy, Christ said they only had a little faith, they needed much more faith to accomplish the task, that faith comes by fasting and praying to know God’s will, receiving revelation from God on what to do.

 

At the foot of the holy mount, amid “the low levels of human life,” Jesus and his three intimate apostles found the other members of the Quorum of the Twelve surrounded by a great multitude in the midst of an unseemly contention. His disciples were being accused, maligned, and ridiculed by the scribes, those self-exalting interpreters of the law who kept alive the traditions and legends of the past.

 

In their ministries the Twelve had gone forth on missions, preaching, healing, casting out devils, perhaps even raising the dead. They had done, in Jesus’ name and by his will, what none others had power to achieve. But this day, though they had tried, they had failed to call down the powers of heaven to heal a poor, suffering soul. And their failure was the source of great satisfaction to the scribes. Had not multitudes forsaken the Galilean when he failed to place manna in their mouths that their bellies might bulge? Had he not failed the Messianic test when he did not show them a sign from heaven, not just a healing that could be done by Satan’s power, but one of the great expected Messianic signs? How could he be their Messiah and Deliverer if he was going to die in Jerusalem? And now his disciples could work no miracles! Surely his influence was declining and soon they would be rid of this imposter who made such self-serving claims for himself!

 

Jesus’ sudden appearance “greatly amazed” the people, though for what reason we do not know. Some have supposed that his face still shone to some extent as had Moses’ when he came down from his holy mount. They all ran to him and saluted him, and he immediately assumed the part of his disciples in the contentious affray then in progress. “What question ye with them?” he asked the scribes.

 

There was no answer. His bearing, his dignity, their knowledge of what he had theretofore done, perhaps their fear of what he might yet do—for sinners always fear the righteous indignation that may burst forth at any time from godly souls—all these combined to lay a blanket of silence over the scribes. Nor did the disciples have opportunity to state their case. Rather, from the multitude came a certain man who said: “Master, I have brought unto thee my son, who hath a dumb spirit that is a devil; and when he seizeth him he teareth him; and he foameth, and gnasheth with his teeth, and pineth away: and I spake to thy disciples that they might cast him out; and they could not.”

 

How sad a case is this! The boy is possessed with a devil—not an ordinary devil, though they all are evil and vicious beyond mortal comprehension, but a particularly violent and offensive follower of the father of lies. This evil spirit has imposed upon the lad all the misfortunes of lunacy, epilepsy, dumbness, atrophy, and suicidal mania. Though alive, the youth suffers a thousand deaths daily. “And I brought him to thy disciples, and they could not cure him,” the father said.

 

Then Jesus, addressing himself to the disciples—whom he loved and to whom he had given power over diseases and evil spirits—and also to the multitudes in general, said: “O faithless and perverse generation, how long shall I be with you? How long shall I suffer you? Bring him hither to me.”

 

Heeding Jesus’ command, they brought forth the lad. Luke says he was the man’s “only child,” though he must by now have been more than twelve years of age, for the account says: “And when the man saw him, immediately he was torn by the spirit: and he fell on the ground and wallowed, foaming.”

 

Jesus seemed to be in no hurry to ease the burden and remove the sufferings imposed by the evil spirit. Perhaps, in part at least, he was letting the multitude assemble and giving them opportunity to envision how serious the affliction was. “How long a time is it since this came upon him?” Jesus inquired of the father. “When a child,” came the response. “And ofttimes it hath cast him into the fire and into the water, to destroy him, but if thou canst, I ask thee to have compassion on us, and help us.”

 

If thou canst”—so importuned the father who had made the agony of his son the suffering of himself. “If thou canst”—there is little or no faith in such a plea, and to it Jesus does not even respond. He feels no need to tell anyone what he can or cannot do; his deeds speak for themselves.

 

“If thou wilt believe all things I shall say unto you, this is possible to him that believeth,” he says. “If thou wilt believe”—that is the issue. The issue is not what Jesus can do—he is God and has all power—but what the man will do. All things are possible to those who have faith. This man has yet to learn the truths that will enable him to have faith. He is just beginning to believe. But no man has all faith and all assurance to begin with, and if anyone covenant in his heart to believe all that is spoken to him by the Lord or his servants, then the desired blessing will flow unto him.

 

In tears, the man who but moments before had knelt before Jesus pleading for mercy now cries out the twofold feelings of his heart. “I believe,” and “help thou mine unbelief.” And so it is with all of the Lord’s suffering saints. They believe—nay, they know—that Jesus is their Lord and has all power and can do all things to bless and help them, and yet their need is for that divine assurance which will enable them to know that the divine help will be forthcoming in their case.

 

Having allowed time for the people to come running together, for this healing must not be done in secret, Jesus now speaks directly to the evil spirit within the man: “Thou dumb and deaf spirit, I charge thee, come out of him, and enter no more into him.” There is a piercing scream; the spirit cries out; agony envelops the man; the spirit rends him; he falls to the earth as though dead; the evil spirit leaves; and many say, “He is dead.” Jesus, however, takes him by the hand and lifts him up, and he arises and is delivered to his father. “And the child was cured from that very hour.” That which could not be done by the disciples, to the joy of the scribes, has now been done by the Master, to their sorrow and discomfiture.

 

Jesus’ triumph—as always—is complete. And yet his disciples are ill at ease; a feeling of failure fills their breasts. Alone in the house, they ask: “Why could not we cast him out?” The reply is clear, incisive, instructive:

 

Because of your unbelief: for verily I say unto you, If ye have faith as a grain of mustard seed, ye shall say unto this mountain, Remove hence to yonder place; and it shall be removed; and nothing shall be impossible unto you.

 

Faith is power; by faith the worlds were made; nothing is impossible to those who have faith. If the earth itself came rolling into existence by faith, surely a mere mountain can be removed by that same power. ‘Let Mount Hermon be cast into the Great Sea.’ Such would not be one whit different than the brother of Jared saying “unto the mountain Zerin, Remove—and it was removed.” (Ether 12:30.) fn

 

However, in a less severe tone, Jesus gives this further explanation as to the failure of the disciples. “Howbeit this kind goeth not out but by fasting and prayer,” he says. Clearly there are degrees of malignity and evil powers among the demons in hell. Just as there is a heavenly hierarchy so is there a satanic government that puts one evil spirit in charge of another; and just as there are degrees of righteousness and glory, so are there levels of lewdness and evil. And it takes greater faith to overcome greater evils. “If a man has not faith enough to do one thing,” the Prophet Joseph Smith says, “he may have faith to do another: if he cannot remove a mountain, he may heal the sick.” (History of the Church 5:355.)

 

And on this occasion of which we now speak, so great was the faith and so wondrous the miracle that Luke concludes: “They were all amazed at the mighty power of God.”

 

 

(Bruce R. McConkie, The Mortal Messiah: From Bethlehem to Calvary, 4 vols. [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1979-1981], 3: 70.)

 

D&C 84:14 – Abraham received the priesthood from Melchizedek, not having known beforehand where to go!

 

As Latter-day Saints, we know a great deal about Melchizedek as a result of these verses in Alma, from Joseph Smith’s translation of the fourteenth chapter of Genesis and the fifth and seventh chapters of Hebrews, and from the Prophet’s sermons on the priesthood. Alma tells us that Melchizedek reigned under or in the stead of his father, whose name is not given; that he received tithes from Abraham; that he was king over the land of Salem, initially a people steeped in wickedness; and that through the exercise of mighty faith and through his preaching ministry as a high priest of the holy order, he helped to establish peace and righteousness among his people (13:15-18). The scriptures also make clear that Melchizedek is a marvelous type of Christ. His name comes from two Hebrew roots, melekh (king), and tzedek (righteousness), Melchi-tzedek meaning literally “king of righteousness” or “my king is righteousness.” We know from modern revelation that to honor him as a great high priest and to avoid the too frequent repetition of the sacred name of Deity, the church in ancient days called the priesthood after his name (D&C 107:3-4). His was a single-minded existence, a life of devotion to duty, a life which pointed people toward the great High Priest, the Prince of Peace. From the Joseph Smith Translation we learn:

 

Now Melchizedek was a man of faith, who wrought righteousness; and when a child he feared God, and stopped the mouths of lions, and quenched the violence of fire.

 

And thus, having been approved of God, he was ordained an high priest after the order of the covenant which God made with Enoch,

 

It being after the order of the Son of God; which order came, not by man, nor the will of man; neither by father nor mother; neither by beginning of days nor end of years; but of God;

 

And it was delivered unto men by the calling of his own voice, according to his own will, unto as many as believed on his name. (JST, Genesis 14:26-29)

 

In writing his epistle to the Hebrews, Paul spoke of Christ who “glorified not himself to be made an high priest; but he that said unto him, Thou art my Son, to day have I begotten thee. As he saith also in another place, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchizedek” (Heb 5:5-6).

 

Who in the days of his flesh, when he had offered up prayers and supplications with strong crying and tears unto him that was able to save him from death, and was heard in that he feared;

 

Though he were a Son, yet learned he obedience by the things which he suffered. (Heb 5:7-8)

 

Most of us have heard these verses quoted scores of times, particularly verse eight, in reference to the place of obedience and suffering in the process of the Son of God becoming perfect. There is, however, a fascinating note at this point on the manuscript page in the Joseph Smith Translation; it states that verses seven and eight “are a parenthesis alluding to Melchizedek and not to Christ” (see footnote a to Heb 5:7 in the LDS Bible). That is to say, Melchizedek, though a son, learned obedience by the things which he suffered. But is such not true of Christ? Certainly. As Elder McConkie has suggested, it is true of both.

 

The fact is verses 7 and 8 apply to both Melchizedek and to Christ, because Melchizedek was a prototype of Christ and that prophet’s ministry typified and foreshadowed that of our Lord in the same sense that the ministry of Moses did. . . . Thus, though the words of these verses, and particularly those in the 7th verse, had original application to Melchizedek, they apply with equal and perhaps even greater force to the life and ministry of him through whom all the promises made to Melchizedek were fulfilled. (Doctrinal 3:157; see also Promised 450-51)

 

And what of the relationship of Melchizedek to Abraham? Alma mentions simply that Abraham paid tithing to him (13:15). An old tradition among the Jews states that “Melchizedek, the king of righteousness, priest of God Most High, and king of Jerusalem, came forth to meet [Abraham],” as Abraham was returning from the war “with bread and wine. And this high priest instructed Abraham in the laws of the priesthood and in the Torah” (Ginzberg 1:233; emphasis added). More specifically, a modern revelation informs us that “Esaias . . . lived in the days of Abraham, and was blessed of him—which Abraham received the priesthood from Melchizedek, who received it through the lineage of his fathers, even till Noah” (D&C 84:14D&C 84:13-14). It appears that Abraham sought for the same power and authority as Melchizedek, the power to administer endless lives, the fulness of the powers of the priesthood. We read the following from the book of Abraham:

 

And finding there was greater happiness and peace and rest for me, I sought for the blessings of the fathers, and the right whereunto I should be ordained to administer the same; having been myself a follower of righteousness, desiring also to be one who possessed great knowledge, and to be a greater follower of righteousness, and to possess a greater knowledge, and to be a father of many nations, a prince of peace, and desiring to receive instructions, and to keep the commandments of God, I became a rightful heir, a High Priest, holding the right belonging to the fathers. (Abraham 1:2)

 

On 27 August 1843, Joseph Smith offered prophetic commentary on the seventh chapter of Hebrews, Paul’s discussion of the place and power of the Melchizedek Priesthood. According to James Burgess, the Prophet said:

 

Paul is here treating of three different priesthoods, namely, the priesthood of Aaron, Abraham, and Melchizedek. Abraham’s priesthood was of greater power than Levi’s, and Melchizedek’s was of greater power than that of Abraham. . . . I ask: was there any sealing power attending this [Levitical] Priesthood that would admit a man into the presence of God? Oh no, but Abraham’s was a more exalted power or priesthood. He could talk and walk with God. And yet consider how great this man [Melchizedek] was when even this patriarch Abraham gave a tenth part of all his spoils and then received a blessing under the hands of Melchizedek—even the last law or a fulness of the law or priesthood, which constituted him a king and priest after the order of Melchizedek or an endless life. (Words of Joseph Smith 245-46, spelling and punctuation corrected; emphasis added.)

 

According to Elder Franklin D. Richards, the Prophet explained that the power of Melchizedek was “not the power of a prophet, nor apostle, nor patriarch only, but of a king and priest to God, to open the windows of heaven and pour out the peace and law of endless life to man. And no man can attain to the joint heirship with Jesus Christ without being administered to by one having the same power and authority of Melchizedek” (Words of Joseph Smith 245; spelling and punctuation corrected). In summary, Joseph the Prophet explained, “Abraham says to Melchizedek, I believe all that thou hast taught me concerning the priesthood and the coming of the Son of Man; so Melchizedek ordained Abraham and sent him away. Abraham rejoiced, saying, Now I have a priesthood” (TPJS 322-23).

 

As we have noted already, Alma taught that the people of Salem “did repent; and Melchizedek did establish peace in the land in his days; therefore he was called the prince of peace” (13:18). More specifically, we are told elsewhere that Melchizedek and his people established Zion and attained a level of transcendent righteousness, even as Enoch. That is, he “obtained peace in Salem, and was called the Prince of peace. And his people wrought righteousness, and obtained heaven, and sought for the city of Enoch which God had before taken. . . . And this Melchizedek, having thus established righteousness, was called the king of heaven by his people, or, in other words, the King of peace” (JST, Genesis 14:33-34, 36; emphasis added). We can thus understand why Alma would close his discussion of Melchizedek in the spirit of tribute: “Now, there were many before him, and also there were many afterwards, but none were greater; therefore, of him they have more particularly made mention” (13:19).

 

And so Melchizedek is the prototype, the example, the scriptural illustration. He received the priesthood, magnified callings in the priesthood, and chose to work righteousness; he made it possible for himself and his people to enter into the rest of the Lord through applying the atoning blood of Christ and by virtue of the sealing powers of the priesthood. Paul likewise stressed the importance and example of this faithful soul: “For this Melchizedek was ordained a priest after the order of the Son of God, which order was without father, without mother, without descent, having neither beginning of days, nor end of life. And all those who are ordained unto this priesthood are made like unto the Son of God, abiding a priest continually” (JST, Heb 7:3), It is in this context, then, that we see the ultimate reward of faithful service in the priesthood, a reward “according to the oath and covenant which belongeth to the priesthood” (D&C 84:39). Those who abide by the covenant of the priesthood magnify their callings therein, and live by every word of God, eventually receive what Enoch and Melchizedek received: God swears unto them with an oath, by his own voice, that the fulness of eternal reward will be theirs (see D&C 84:33-40).

 

 

(Monte S. Nyman and Charles D. Tate, Jr., eds., Alma, the Testimony of the Word [Provo: BYU Religious Studies Center, 1992], 80.)

 

 

(Moses 7:12-13.)

 

12 And it came to pass that Enoch continued to call upon all the people, save it were the people of Canaan, to repent;

 

13 And so great was the faith of Enoch that he led the people of God, and their enemies came to battle against them; and he spake the word of the Lord, and the earth trembled, and the mountains fled, even according to his command; and the rivers of water were turned out of their course; and the roar of the lions was heard out of the wilderness; and all nations feared greatly, so powerful was the word of Enoch, and so great was the power of the language which God had given him.

 

 

Enoch was preaching and leading his people.  The faith of Enoch was so strong that he knew what to do because of the power of the language which God had given him.  God gave Enoch the power to cause the earth to tremble, the rivers and mountains to change, he received this power because of his faith.

 

Keys can only be exercised by faith.  President Hinckley holds the keys of the priesthood today, he exercising the keys by his faith.  We must obey what he asks us to do, we then exercise our faith!

 

Faith and Keys

Elder Henry B. Eyring
Of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles

We have to know by inspiration that the priesthood keys are held by those who lead and serve us. That requires the witness of the Spirit.

In a chapel far from Salt Lake City, in a place where a member of the Quorum of the Twelve rarely goes, a father approached me. He led his young son by the hand. As they reached me, he looked down at the boy, called him by name, and said, nodding his head towards me, “This is an Apostle.” I could tell by the sound of the father’s voice that he was hoping his son would feel more than that he was meeting a dignified visitor. He hoped that his son would feel a conviction that priesthood keys were on the earth in the Lord’s Church. His son will need that conviction again and again. He will need it when he opens a letter from some future prophet he has never seen calling him to a mission. He will need it when he buries a child or a wife or a parent. He will need it for courage to follow direction to serve. He will need it for the comfort that comes from trusting a sealing power that binds forever.

Missionaries will invite investigators to meet a bishop or branch president today with the same intent. They hope that the investigators will feel far more than that they have met a nice man or even a great man. They will be praying that the investigators will feel a conviction that this apparently ordinary man holds priesthood keys in the Lord’s Church. The investigators will need that conviction when they go into the waters of baptism. They will need it when they pay tithing. They will need that conviction when the bishop is inspired to give them a calling. They will need it when they see him presiding in the sacrament meeting and when he nourishes them by teaching the gospel.

And so missionaries and fathers, and all of us who serve others in the true Church, want to help those we love gain a lasting testimony that the keys of the priesthood are held by the Lord’s servants in His Church. I speak today to encourage all who labor to instill and strengthen that testimony.

It will help to recognize some things. First, God is persistent and generous in offering the blessings of priesthood power to His children. Second, His children must choose for themselves to qualify for and receive those blessings. And third, Satan, the enemy of righteousness, has from the beginning tried to undermine the faith necessary to receive the blessings made possible by priesthood power.

I learned about those realities from a wise teacher nearly 25 years ago. I spoke in an ancient theater in Ephesus . Bright sunlight flooded the ground where the Apostle Paul had stood to preach. My topic was Paul, the Apostle called of God.

The audience was hundreds of Latter-day Saints. They were arranged on the rows of stone benches the Ephesians sat upon more than a millennium before. Among them were two living Apostles, Elder Mark E. Petersen and Elder James E. Faust.

As you can imagine, I had prepared carefully. I had read the Acts of the Apostles and the Epistles, both those of Paul and his fellow Apostles. I had read and pondered Paul’s Epistle to the Ephesians.

I tried my best to honor Paul and his office. After the talk, a number of people said kind things. Both of the living Apostles were generous in their comments. But later, Elder Faust took me aside and, with a smile and with softness in his voice, said, “That was a good talk. But you left out the most important thing you could have said.”

I asked him what that was. Weeks later he consented to tell me. His answer has been teaching me ever since.

He said that I could have told the people that if the Saints who heard Paul had possessed a testimony of the value and the power of the keys he held, perhaps the Apostles would not have had to be taken from the earth.

That sent me back to Paul’s letter to the Ephesians. I could see that Paul wanted the people to feel the value of the chain of priesthood keys reaching from the Lord through His Apostles to them, the members of the Lord’s Church. Paul was trying to build a testimony of those keys.

Paul testified to the Ephesians that Christ was at the head of His Church. And he taught that the Savior built His Church on a foundation of apostles and prophets who hold all the keys of the priesthood.

Despite the clarity and the power of his teaching and his example, Paul knew that an apostasy would come. He knew that apostles and prophets would be taken from the earth. And he knew that they would, in some great, future day, be restored. He wrote of that time to the Ephesians, speaking of what the Lord would do: “That in the dispensation of the fulness of times he might gather together in one all things in Christ, both which are in heaven, and which are on earth; even in him.”1

Paul looked forward to the ministry of the Prophet Joseph Smith, when the heavens would be opened again. It happened. John the Baptist came and conferred on mortals the priesthood of Aaron and the keys of the ministering of angels and of baptism by immersion for the remission of sins.

Ancient apostles and prophets returned and conferred upon Joseph the keys they held in mortality. Mortal men were ordained to the holy apostleship in February of 1835. Priesthood keys were given to the Twelve Apostles in the latter part of March 1844.

The Prophet Joseph Smith knew that his death was imminent. He knew that the precious priesthood keys and the apostleship must not be and would not be lost again.

One of the Apostles, Wilford Woodruff, left us this account of what happened in Nauvoo as the Prophet spoke to the Twelve:

“On that occasion the Prophet Joseph rose up and said to us: ‘Brethren, I have desired to live to see this temple built. I shall never live to see it, but you will. I have sealed upon your heads all the keys of the kingdom of God . I have sealed upon you every key, power, principle that the God of heaven has revealed to me. Now, no matter where I may go or what I may do, the kingdom rests upon you.’ “2

Every prophet that followed Joseph, from Brigham Young to President Hinckley, has held and exercised those keys and has held the sacred apostleship.

But just as in the time of Paul, the power of those priesthood keys for us requires our faith. We have to know by inspiration that the priesthood keys are held by those who lead and serve us. That requires the witness of the Spirit.

And that depends upon our testimony that Jesus is the Christ and that He lives and leads His Church. We must also know for ourselves that the Lord restored His Church and the priesthood keys through the Prophet Joseph Smith. And we must have an assurance through the Holy Ghost, refreshed often, that those keys have been passed without interruption to the living prophet and that the Lord blesses and directs His people through the line of priesthood keys which reaches down through presidents of stakes and of districts and through bishops and branch presidents to us, wherever we are and no matter how far from the prophet and the apostles.

That is not easy today. It was not easy in the days of Paul. It has always been hard to recognize in fallible human beings the authorized servants of God. Paul must have seemed an ordinary man to many. Joseph Smith’s cheerful disposition was seen by some as not fitting their expectations for a prophet of God.

Satan will always work on the Saints of God to undermine their faith in priesthood keys. One way he does it is to point out the humanity of those who hold them. He can in that way weaken our testimony and so cut us loose from the line of keys by which the Lord ties us to Him and can take us and our families home to Him and to our Heavenly Father.

Satan succeeded in undermining the testimony of men who had, with Joseph Smith, seen the heavens opened and heard the voices of angels. The evidence of their physical eyes and ears was not enough when they no longer could feel the testimony that the priesthood keys were still in place with Joseph.

The warning for us is plain. If we look for human frailty in humans, we will always find it. When we focus on finding the frailties of those who hold priesthood keys, we run risks for ourselves. When we speak or write to others of such frailties, we put them at risk.

We live in a world where finding fault in others seems to be the favorite blood sport. It has long been the basis of political campaign strategy. It is the theme of much television programming across the world. It sells newspapers. Whenever we meet anyone, our first, almost unconscious reaction may be to look for imperfections.

To keep ourselves grounded in the Lord’s Church, we can and must train our eyes to recognize the power of the Lord in the service of those He has called. We must be worthy of the companionship of the Holy Ghost. And we need to pray for the Holy Ghost to help us know that men who lead us hold this power. For me, such prayers are most often answered when I am fully engaged in the Lord’s service myself.

It happened in the aftermath of a disaster. A dam in Idaho broke on a June day. A wall of water struck the communities below it. Thousands of people, mostly Latter-day Saints, fled their homes to go to safety.

I was there as the people faced the terrible task of recovery. I saw the stake president gather his bishops to lead the people. We were cut off in those first days from any supervision from outside. I was in the meeting of local leaders when a director from the federal disaster agency arrived.

He tried to take over the meeting. With great force he began to list the things that he said needed to be done. As he read aloud each item, the stake president, who was sitting near him, said quietly, “We’ve already done that.” After that went on for five or ten minutes, the federal official grew silent and sat down. He listened quietly as the stake president took reports from the bishops and gave directions.

For the meeting the next day, the federal disaster official arrived early. He sat toward the back. The stake president began the meeting. He took more reports, and he gave instructions. After a few minutes, the federal official, who had come with all the authority and resources of his great agency, said, “President Ricks, what would you like us to do?”

He recognized power. I saw more. I recognized the evidence of keys and the faith that unlocks their power.

It happened again when a man and his wife arrived back in town just after the dam had broken. They didn’t go to their home. They went first to find their bishop. He was covered in mud, leading his members in mucking out homes. They asked what he would have them do.

They went to work. Much later, they took a few minutes to check on their own house. It was gone. So they went back to work wherever their bishop asked them to help. They knew where to go to get the Lord’s direction for service in His Church.

I learned then as I have since how the stakes of Zion become places of safety. They become like a great family, united, caring for each other. It comes by simple faith.

By faith they are baptized and receive the Holy Ghost. As they continue to keep the commandments, that gift becomes constant. They can recognize spiritual things. It becomes easier to see the power of God working through the common people God calls to serve and lead them. Hearts are softened. Strangers become fellow citizens in the Lord’s kingdom, united in loving bonds.

That happy condition will not last without a constant renewal of faith. The bishop we love will be released, as will the stake president. The Apostles we followed in faith will be taken home to the God who called them.

With those continual changes comes a great opportunity. We can act to qualify for the revelation that allows us to know that the keys are being passed by God from one person to another. We can seek to have that experience again and again. And we must, in order to receive the blessings God has for us and wants us to offer to others.

The answer to your prayer is not likely to be as dramatic as it was when some saw Brigham Young, as he spoke, take on the appearance of the martyred Prophet Joseph. But it can be as sure. And with that spiritual assurance will come peace and power. You will know again that this is the Lord’s true and living Church, that He leads it through His ordained servants, and that He cares about us.

If enough of us exercise that faith and receive those assurances, God will lift up those who lead us and so bless our lives and our families. We will become what Paul so wanted for those he served: “built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone.”3

I testify, I know that Jesus Christ is our Savior and that He lives. I know that He is the rock upon which this, His true Church, stands. In the name of Jesus Christ, amen.


NOTES

1. Ephesians 1:10.
2. “The Keys of the Kingdom,Liahona, Apr. 2004, 42; Ensign, Apr. 2004, 30.
3. Ephesians 2:20.

 

 

 

(Moses 7:18.)

 

18 And the Lord called his people ZION, because they were of one heart and one mind, and dwelt in righteousness; and there was no poor among them.

 

 

Zion



In December of 1831, Sidney Rigdon became Joseph Smith's Scribe.  That same month, Moses 7 was received as part of the Joseph Smith Translation of the Bible.  In that revelation, the concept of Zion was further revealed.  Note Moses 7:18:

Moses 7
     18 And the Lord called his people ZION, because they were of one heart and one mind, and dwelt in righteousness; and there was no poor among them.

Notice the three parts that define Zion:

(1)  They were of one heart and one mind,

(2)  They dwelt in righteousness;

(3)  And there was no poor among them.



One Heart and One Mind

One heart and one mind expresses the idea that the community is in omplete unity in thought and action with God and his prophets.

Dwelt in Righteousness

President Jame E. Faust taught, "One might ask, “How do I become a greater follower of righteousness?” A righteous person is one who makes and keeps gospel covenants." ("Key to the Knowledge of God," Ensign Nov 2004, p 52)

 

No Poor Among Them

Another way to put this is that all in Zion are SELF RELIANT.

President Marion G. Romney taught the importance of this in these words: 

The scriptures are full of commandments regarding our obligation to care for the poor; therefore, I will not elaborate further. It has always seemed somewhat paradoxical to me that we must constantly have the Lord command us to do those things which are for our own good. The Lord has said,

"He that findeth his life shall lose it: and he that loseth his life for my sake shall find it" (Matthew 10:39).

We lose our life by serving and lifting others. By so doing we experience the only true and lasting happiness. Service is not something we endure on this earth so we can earn the right to live in the celestial kingdom. Service is the very fiber of which an exalted life in the celestial kingdom is made.

Knowing that service is what gives our Father in Heaven fulfillment, and knowing that we want to be where He is and as He is, why must we be commanded to serve one another? Oh, for the glorious day when these things all come naturally because of the purity of our hearts. In that day there will be no need for a commandment because we will have experienced for ourselves that we are truly happy only when we are engaged in unselfish service. Let us use the freedom which comes from self-reliance in giving and serving.

 
Can we see how critical self-reliance becomes when looked upon as the prerequisite to service, when we also know service is what Godhood is all about? Without self-reliance one cannot exercise these innate desires to serve. How can we give if there is nothing there? Food for the hungry cannot come from empty shelves. Money to assist the needy cannot come from an empty purse. Support and understanding cannot come from the emotionally starved. Teaching cannot come from the unlearned. And most important of all, spiritual guidance cannot come from the spiritually weak.

There is an interdependence between those who have and those who have not. The process of giving exalts the poor and humbles the rich. In the process, both are sanctified. [CR, 136] The poor, released from the bondage and limitations of poverty, are enabled as free men to rise to their full potential, both temporally and spiritually. The rich, by imparting of their surplus, participate in the eternal principle of giving. Once a person has been made whole or self-reliant, he reaches out to aid others, and the cycle repeats itself.

We are all self-reliant in some areas and dependent in others. Therefore, each of us should strive to help others in areas where we have strengths. At the same time, pride should not prevent us from graciously accepting the helping hand of another when we have a real need. To do so denies another person the opportunity to participate in a sanctifying experience.

Again, I say the principle of self-reliance is spiritual, as are all the principles of the welfare program.  ("Celestial Nature of Self-Reliance," Ensign, Nov. 1982, 91-93)


What Zion means:  Welfare broadcasts, teachings of the prophet and apostles, strengthen the home

 

1. One heart     Unity with the Lord’s will worldwide emphasis on the family.  Following God’s

 

2. One mind      will through the prophet and personal revelation, and then apply it in our lives

 

3. Dwell in Righteousness    Make and keep covenants, entering into and honoring temple

                                                    covenants, keep a life of consecration to the kingdom

 

       4.  No poor among them    Self reliance, the freedom to act (agency) to the will of God.  PEF,

                                                  welfare, humanitarian aid, missionary fund

 

 

June 2006 Ensign will have the complete worldwide broadcast given in February 2006.

 

We are doing what Enoch did in our Church today!

 

Study the priesthood manuals of the teachings of the Presidents of the Church, also Conference Reports from the 1970’s on.

 

Zion: From the Prophet’s Translation of the Bible

 

In June 1830 Joseph Smith began a careful study of the King James Version of the Bible. With Oliver Cowdery as scribe, he began to prepare what he called a “new translation” of the scriptures, what was called for years the Inspired Version and what we now know as the Joseph Smith Translation of the Bible (JST). John Whitmer, Emma Smith, Frederick G. Williams, Newel K. Whitney, and Sidney Rigdon served, at one time or another, as scribes. Rigdon joined the Church in November 1830, traveled from Ohio to meet the Prophet, and began to labor with Joseph in early December. A journal entry of Joseph Smith in December 1830 regarding his work with the King James Bible is instructive:

 

“It may be well to observe here, that the Lord greatly encouraged and strengthened the faith of his little flock . . . which had embraced the fulness of the everlasting Gospel, as revealed to them in the Book of Mormon, by giving some more extended information upon the Scriptures, a translation of which had already commenced. Much conjecture and conversation frequently occurred among the Saints, concerning the books mentioned, and referred to, in various places in the Old and New Testaments, which were now nowhere to be found. The common remark was, ‘They are lost books’; but it seems the Apostolic Church had some of these writings, as Jude mentions or quotes the prophecy of Enoch, the seventh from Adam. To the joy of the little flock . . . did the Lord reveal the following doings of olden times, from the prophecy of Enoch.” Fn

 

Whereas the biblical record in Genesis 5 contains only three verses descriptive of the ministry of Enoch, Genesis in the Joseph Smith Translation consists of more than one hundred verses. A careful reading of the text reveals the following about Enoch:

 

1. At the age of sixty-five Enoch was called of God to cry repentance to a wicked people.

 

2. Though shy, hesitant, and slow of speech, Enoch was given divine assurance and promised great power: “Behold my spirit is upon you, wherefore all thy words will I justify; and the mountains shall flee before you, and the rivers shall turn from their course; and thou shalt abide in me, and I in you; therefore walk with me.” (JST Genesis 6:36.)

 

3. Enoch became a seer and was given a knowledge of “things which were not visible to the natural eye.” (JST Genesis 6:38.)

 

4. Enoch’s preaching led many people to repent. The city became so righteous that “the Lord came and dwelt with his people, and they dwelt in righteousness.” Further, “the fear of the Lord was upon all nations, so great was the glory of the Lord, which was upon his people.” (JST Genesis 7:20-21.)

 

5. Enoch established an economic order for the poor and needy. “And the Lord called his people Zion, because they were of one heart and one mind, and dwelt in righteousness; and there was no poor among them.” The city of Enoch came to be known as “the City of Holiness, even Zion.” (JST Genesis 7:23, 25.)

 

6. Enoch saw in vision a future day when the “elect” would be gathered to a “Holy City,” a latter-day community that “shall be called Zion, a New Jerusalem.” (JST Genesis 7:70.)

 

61      Enoch and his people were eventually translated, taken into heaven without experiencing death. “And Enoch and all his people walked with God, and he dwelt in the midst of Zion; and it came to pass that Zion was not, for God received it up into his own bosom; and from thence went forth the saying, Zion is fled.” (JST Genesis 7:77-78.) Later in Genesis, by the way, we learn (through the Prophet’s inspired translation) of the people of Melchizedek, a people who “wrought righteousness, and obtained heaven, and sought for the city of Enoch which God had before taken, separating it from the earth, having reserved it unto the latter days, or the end of the world.” (JST Genesis 14:34.)

 

Joseph Smith’s discovery of the Zion of Enoch through his work of Bible translation became pivotal in the quest for a society of Zion among the Mormons. Enoch became the pattern, the scriptural prototype by which all social, economic, or spiritual programs were to be judged. “The vision of Enoch,” one anthropologist has written, “helped define Zion’s social order, which was called on occasion the ‘city’ or ‘order of Enoch.’ “ In addition, Enoch’s city “came to be the divine model for the Mormons’ earthly undertakings, the platonic essence, if you will, of [the Prophet’s] subsequent commandments and revelations on the subject. According to this vision, Zion’s ideal urban order would be permeated by religion. Religion, not politics, would ensure domestic tranquility. Religion, not the military, would provide for the common defense. Religion, not economics, would promote the general welfare.” In short, the Prophet’s revelation of Enoch “gave theological, cosmological, eschatological, social, and personal sanction to the quest for Zion.” Fn

 

Zion: A State of Being

 

In time the concept of Zion began to expand in the minds of the Saints, so that Zion came to refer not only to a specific location—be it Jackson County or even Kirtland, Ohio (see D&C 94:1; 96:1)—but also to a state of being, a state of righteousness. “Let Zion rejoice,” the prophetic word acclaimed, “for this is Zion—The pure in heart; therefore, let Zion rejoice, while all the wicked shall mourn.” (D&C 97:21.) Zion was to be the abode of the faithful, the gathering place of the pure in heart, no matter its location. The rebellious had no place in Zion (D&C 64:35), for Zion was to become a holy commonwealth wherein the law of the celestial kingdom was to be in effect (D&C 105:5, 32). President Brigham Young thus spoke of the Saints having Zion in their heart. “Unless the people live before the Lord in the obedience of His commandments, they cannot have Zion within them. They must carry it with them, if they expect to live in it, to enjoy it, and increase in it. . . .

 

“ . . . As to the spirit of Zion, it is in the hearts of the Saints, of those who love and serve the Lord with all their might, mind, and strength.” Fn

 

On another occasion he affirmed: “Zion will be redeemed and built up, and the Saints will rejoice. This is the land of Zion; and who are Zion? The pure in heart are Zion; they have Zion within them. Purify yourselves, sanctify the Lord God in your hearts, and have the Zion of God within you, and then you will rejoice more and more.” Fn

 

Finally, President Young alluded to the scriptural warning found in Doctrine and Covenants 45:68. “The time is nigh,” he taught, “when every man that will not take up his sword against his neighbour must needs flee to Zion. Where is Zion? Where the organization of the Church of God is. And may it dwell spiritually in every heart; and may we so live as to always enjoy the Spirit of Zion!” fn

 

Zion and the Economy

 

From the very beginning the Saints were encouraged to put their trust “in that Spirit which leadeth to do good—yea, to do justly, to walk humbly, to judge righteously; and this is my Spirit.” (D&C 11:12.) This spirit of unselfishness, of brotherhood and equity, was what had characterized the Nephites during their golden era. Of that supernal season Mormon wrote: “And they taught, and did minister one to another; and they had all things common among them, every man dealing justly, one with another.” (3 Nephi 26:19.) People who trust in the Spirit of the Lord, who give themselves over to the mind of the Almighty, come to love as he loves, to seek out and succor the needy, to see to the wants of those who hunger and thirst. It follows naturally, therefore, that the Lord should reveal those principles by which individuals and societies can be made one. Joseph the Prophet had learned of Enoch’s day that “the Lord called his people Zion, because they were of one heart and one mind, and dwelt in righteousness; and there was no poor among them.” (Moses 7:18Moses 7:18.) Less than a month after teaching his latter-day Saints about the ancient City of Holiness enjoyed by his former-day Saints, the Lord counseled his people by parable: “Let every man esteem his brother as himself, and ractice virtue and holiness before me.

 

“And again I say unto you, let every man esteem his brother as himself.

 

“For what man among you having twelve sons, and is no respecter of them, and they serve him obediently, and he saith unto the one: Be thou clothed in robes and sit thou here; and to the other: Be thou clothed in rags and sit thou there—and looketh upon his sons and saith I am just?

 

“Behold, this I have given unto you as a parable, and it is even as I am. I say unto you, be one; and if ye are not one ye are not mine.” (D&C 38:24-27.)

 

God soon made known to the Latter-day Saints those ideals and principles by which a modern Zion could be set up. Indeed, fundamental laws and principles of consecration and stewardship occupy a substantial portion of the Doctrine and Covenants; further, the economic implementation of the law of consecration in Ohio and Missouri, as well as the dissemination of the higher covenants of consecration in Nauvoo, proved to be a righteous obsession of Joseph Smith and the early leaders of the Church. Fn Formal instructions began with the revelation known as the law of the Church, section 42 of the Doctrine and Covenants, and pressing particulars concerning the role of the bishop in the care of the poor (D&C 41; 72), the deeding of properties (D&C 51), and the care of widows and the fatherless (D&C 83) soon followed. When the Saints proved unable, because of circumstances and selfishness, to live fully the economic principles set forth in the revelations and which characterize the society of Zion, the Lord explained that “were it not for the transgressions of my people, speaking concerning the church and not individuals, they might have been redeemed even now.

 

“But behold, they have not learned to be obedient to the things which I required at their hands, but are full of all manner of evil, and do not impart of their substance, as becometh saints, to the poor and afflicted among them;

 

“And are not united according to the union required by the law of the celestial kingdom;

 

“And Zion cannot be built up unless it is by the principles of the law of the celestial kingdom; otherwise I cannot receive her unto myself.” (D&C 105:2-5.)

 

Zion: The Ideal Society

 

The establishment of a Zion society entailed more to Joseph Smith than simply the explication of religious doctrine on Sunday mornings. Although religion was the foundation for such a community, yet the ultimate challenge was to so structure the activities of the citizens as to engender the principles of Zion within all phases of life—social, economic, political, and, of course, spiritual. “I intend to lay a foundation,” Joseph Smith boldly declared, “that will revolutionize the whole world.” And then, emphasizing the source of this revolutionary movement, he added, “It will not be by sword or gun that this kingdom will roll on: the power of truth is such that all nations will be under the necessity of obeying the Gospel.” Fn Zion was to stand as a banner, an ensign, to the people of the earth.

 

Zion as the heart of the kingdom of God was to be an ensign and a standard to the world, that all men might look to her and pattern their lives and their social arrangements after her example of truth and righteousness. An ensign is a distinguished flag or banner, used in ancient times to direct the actions of men such as in a military campaign. As an ensign to the world in the last days, Zion was to be a rallying point of truth—to attract the attention of all men and direct them into the paths of peace and progression.

 

“As a messenger before the Lord, the society of Zion was to be a nucleus of the millennial kingdom—an opening wedge—containing the basic principles and powers through which, eventually, peace and good will could be established universally among men. The divine system was to be developed among the Saints first, and then expanded throughout the earth as the millennial kingdom of Christ was ushered in.” fn

 

Zion was and is to be the focus of all that is good, all that is ennobling, all that is instructive and inspirational. In Zion all things were to be gathered together in one in Christ. (Ephesians 1:10.) In addition, the Saints were to judge by a set of standards derived and obtained from a source beyond that of unenlightened man. “Behold, I, the Lord, have made my church in these last days like unto a judge sitting on a hill, or in a high place, to judge the nations. For it shall come to pass that the inhabitants of Zion shall judge all things pertaining to Zion.” (D&C 64:37-38.) In short, “every accomplishment, every polished grace, every useful attainment in mathematics, music, in all science and art belong to the Saints.” Fn The Saints “rapidly collect the intelligence that is bestowed upon the nations, for all this intelligence belongs to Zion.” Fn The following ideas, attributed to Joseph Smith, illustrate the spirit of Zion that was meant to be a part of every facet of life among the Saints:

 

“He [the Prophet] recommended the Saints to cultivate as high a state of perfection in their musical harmonies as the standard of the faith which he had brought was superior to sectarian religion. To obtain this, he gave them to understand that the refinement of singing would depend upon the attainment of the Holy Spirit. . . . When these graces and refinements and all the kindred attractions are obtained that characterized the ancient Zion of Enoch, then the Zion of the last days will become beautiful, she will be hailed by the Saints from the four winds, who will gather to Zion with songs of everlasting joy.” Fn

 

In seeking to expand the Latter-day Saints’ vision of what could be accomplished through the elevated perspective provided by the gospel, President Spencer W. Kimball observed that “our own talent, obsessed with dynamism from a CAUSE” could produce masterpieces in literature and art that will yet surpass what has been rendered by the world’s greatest. “Take a da Vinci or a Michelangelo or a Shakespeare and give him a total knowledge of the plan of salvation of God and personal revelation and cleanse him, and then take a look at the statues he will carve and the murals he will paint and the masterpieces he will produce. Take a Handel with his purposeful effort, his superb talent, his earnest desire to properly depict the story, and give him inward vision of the whole true story and revelation, and what a master you have!” fn

 

Perhaps one of the most glorious and expansive visions of Zion and the people of God was shared by President John Taylor. He explained that the Saints shall yet “rear splendid edifices, magnificent temples and beautiful cities that shall become the pride, praise and glory of the whole earth. We believe that this people will excel in literature, in science and the arts and in manufactures. In fact, there will be a concentration of wisdom, not only of the combined wisdom of the world as it now exists, but men will be inspired in regard to all these matters in a manner and to an extent that they never have been before, and we shall have eventually, when the Lord’s purposes are carried out, the most magnificent buildings, the most pleasant and beautiful gardens, the richest and most costly clothing, and be the most healthy and the most intellectual people that will reside upon the earth. This is part and parcel of our faith. . . . the people, from the President down, will all be under the guidance and direction of the Lord in all the pursuits of human life, until eventually they will be enabled to erect cities that will be fit to be caught up—that when Zion descends from above, Zion will also ascend from beneath, and be prepared to associate with those from above. . . . This is the idea, in brief, that we have entertained in relation to many of these things.” Fn

 

Truly, “Zion must increase in beauty, and in holiness; her borders must be enlarged; her stakes must be strengthened; yea, verily I say unto you, Zion must arise and put on her beautiful garments.” (D&C 82:14.)

 

Conclusion

 

The quest for the city of God among the Latter-day Saints—the quest for Zion—has been and continues to be a noble cause among our people, providing both direction and motivation toward that eschatological ideal we have come to know as a society of the pure in heart. Zion, “the highest order of priesthood society,” fn is a concept that has grown and expanded since the time Joseph Smith encountered it in the Book of Mormon in the early part of the last century. It, like many other aspects of the restored gospel, has been unfolded to the people of modern Israel by the God of Israel in “line upon line, precept upon precept” fashion. “New circumstances,” Elder Orson Pratt noted, “require new power, new knowledge, new additions, new strength.” Fn

 

Elder Erastus Snow pointed out in 1884 that when the early Saints “first heard the fullness of the Gospel preached by the first Elders, and read the revelations given through the Prophet Joseph Smith, our ideas of Zion were very limited. But as our minds began to grow and expand, why we began to look upon Zion as a great people and the Stakes of Zion as numerous. . . . We ceased to set bounds to Zion and her Stakes.” Fn As Zion has grown, so has our understanding of Zion. And a part of that understanding is an appreciation for the patient maturity required for the regeneration of a people and the renovation of a society, an awareness that Zion is established “in process of time.” (Moses 7:21.) Neither spiritual marathons nor excessive zeal are required; rather, the peaceful plodding that characterizes those who have a “steadfastness in Christ” (2 Nephi 31:20) will result in purity of heart and achievement of the prophetic ideal. “Let our anxiety be centred upon this one thing,” President Brigham Young counseled, “the sanctification of our own hearts, the purifying of our own affections, the preparing of ourselves for the approach of the events that are hastening upon us.” And then in a manner that has particular relevance to those of us who grow impatient with the Lord’s timetable, President Young added: “Be satisfied to let the Lord have his own time and way, and be patient. Seek to have the Spirit of Christ that we may . . . prepare ourselves for the times that are coming. This is our duty.” Fn

 

 

(Susan Easton Black et al., Doctrines for Exaltation: The 1989 Sperry Symposium on the Doctrine and Covenants [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1989], 183 – 184.)

 

 

Our prophets saw what we would be dealing with and what we would need, just like Isaiah, Nephi, Mormon and Moroni.

 

Our 1st Presidency and Quorum of then 12 think globally, we need to consecrate our $$ to help build up the kingdom throughout the world.  The laws of sacrifice, worship and consecration are taught in the temple, and we make covenants to obey these laws.

 

 

 

 

Moses 7 and the Marriage Covenant

 

 

 

The Saints leave New York to gather to Ohio.

 

Sidney Rigdon was a skilled, knowledgeable man who knew the scriptures well; he was also good with the English language.

 

Moses 7 was needed before D&C 38, it’s important to study both, they are tied together.

 

Zion – Satan’s influence on the earth and on man – God wept            

 

Because more light has been given with the Restoration, wickedness has also increased on the earth.

 

Alma gives understanding of the Spirit World he had received from an angel to his son Corianton (Alma 39-42)

 

It takes time to understand doctrine, even prophets are always learning.  Alma was a High Priest and had questions about the Spirit World.  Joseph Smith received revelation about the Spirit World 16 years after the 1st vision (D&C 137).  Joseph F. Smith, close to death received a vision about the Spirit World (D&C 138).

 

 

God is merciful; if we sincerely repent He will take us back as His sons and daughters.  God is just and merciful, but mercy cannot satisfy justice, God will do everything He can to help His children.

 

 

Must Be Governed
by Laws, Principles and Feelings

John Taylor

"God is interested in the whole of the human family. He cannot take them all into the celestial kingdom, for they are not all prepared to go there, and you cannot prepare them and He cannot, because they have to be governed by certain laws and certain principles and certain feelings, and if they are not governed by these and will not be governed by a celestial law, they are not prepared for a celestial glory. There are some that may be governed by a terrestrial law, and may be prepared for a terrestrial glory, but not for a celestial glory. Still, they are God's children, and He is doing the best by them He can."

(Journal of Discourses, 24:195)

 

 

Mortality is a dot compared to the time frame before and after our lives.

 

God is passionate He shows emotion, part of His character.  Moses 7:28-40)

 

Moses 7 helped Joseph understand a little more about work for the dead.

 

There is an interesting and highly spiritual event recorded in Moses 7:28-41, in which Enoch witnessed the God of heaven weeping. He expressed his astonishment that the Lord, who had so many creations and so much power, should weep. The Lord explained that he wept because of the wickedness of his children that they were without natural affection; they hated one another, and would not receive him to be their Father and God, and that because of their wickedness they would have to suffer. Then Enoch also wept with the Lord. That is a most spiritual and touching scene, and we are indebted to the Prophet Joseph Smith’s translation of Genesis (also recorded in the book of Moses), which contains this remarkable record.

(Richard D. Draper, ed., A Witness of Jesus Christ: The 1989 Sperry Symposium on the Old Testament [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1990], 146.)

 

 

(Moses 7:41-44.)

 

41 And it came to pass that the Lord spake unto Enoch, and told Enoch all the doings of the children of men; wherefore Enoch knew, and looked upon their wickedness, and their misery, and wept and stretched forth his arms, and his heart swelled wide as eternity; and his bowels yearned; and all eternity shook.

 

42 And Enoch also saw Noah, and his family; that the posterity of all the sons of Noah should be saved with a temporal salvation;

 

43 Wherefore Enoch saw that Noah built an ark; and that the Lord smiled upon it, and held it in his own hand; but upon the residue of the wicked the floods came and swallowed them up.

 

44 And as Enoch saw this, he had bitterness of soul, and wept over his brethren, and said unto the heavens: I will refuse to be comforted; but the Lord said unto Enoch: Lift up your heart, and be glad; and look.

 

Enoch also sees the coming of the Lord and is glad, Moses 7:47-61.

 

 

Enoch's Visions of the Future

 

Enoch, like so many of those with the prophetic mantle, was given a panoramic vision of the Lord's creations, including a vision of all of the inhabitants of this earth (cf. Moses 1:8, 27; Abr. 3:12). Spanning time in a glimpse, Enoch saw that future day when his own city of holiness, Zion, would be taken up into heaven. In stark contrast he "beheld Satan; and he [Satan] had a great chain in his hand, and it veiled the whole face of the earth with darkness; and he looked up and laughed, and his angels rejoiced" (Moses 7:26). Shifting his vision and perspective again, Enoch beheld other righteous individuals living after the translation of Zion, those between the days of Enoch and the flood. "And the Holy Ghost fell on many, and they were caught up by the powers of heaven into Zion" (Moses 7:27). That is, "after those in the City of Holiness were translated and taken up into heaven without tasting death, so that Zion as a people and a congregation had fled from the battle-scarred surface of the earth, the Lord sought others among men who would serve him. From the days of Enoch to the flood, new converts and true believers, except those needed to carry out the Lord's purposes among mortals, were translated." fn

 

Being filled with the Spirit, Enoch the Seer was alive and sensitive to the things of God. He witnessed as the God of heaven wept in behalf of his wayward children on earth. "How is it," the prophet inquired, "that the heavens weep, and shed forth their tears as the rain upon the mountains?" Further, "How is it that thou canst weep, seeing thou art holy, and from all eternity?" Enoch's questions are the type that would probably be on the minds of most mortal and finite men: How is it possible that the Omnipotent, Omniscient, and Omnipresent One can weep? How can it be that he who is from everlasting to everlasting, the Creator and governor of "millions of earths like this," is touched and emotionally moved with sorrow over a grovelling mass of mere mortals? It was in questioning that Enoch began to come to understanding of infinite worth. The prophet Enoch had reaffirmed upon his soul the glorious truth that God is an exalted man, the Father of the spirits of all humanity, and that he lives in the family unit. In spite of the vastness of his creative activities, he is there, and his bosom is there: he is available, and his mercy and kindness are forever (Moses 7:28-30). God's infinity does not preclude either his immediacy or his intimacy. The Lord's tender regard for his offspring is evident in the following passage:

 

The Lord said unto Enoch: Behold these thy brethren; they are the workmanship of mine own hand, and I gave unto them their knowledge, in the day I created them; and in the Garden of Eden, gave I unto man his agency;

 

And unto thy brethren have I said, and also given commandment, that they should love one another, and that they should choose me, their Father; but behold, they are without affection, and they hate their own blood. . .

 

Behold, I am God; Man of Holiness is my name; Man of Counsel is my name; and Endless and Eternal is my name, also.

 

Wherefore, I can stretch forth mine hands and hold all the creation which I have made; and mine eye can pierce them also, and among all the workmanship of mine hands there has not been so great wickedness among thy brethren. . . .

 

Wherefore should not the heavens weep, seeing these shall suffer? (Moses 7:32-33, 35-37). fn

 

Sharing the Lord's vision and perspective, Enoch responded to the wickedness of mankind in a similar fashion. "His heart swelled wide as eternity; and his bowels yearned; and all eternity shook." Witnessing specifically the decadent decades of Noah's day, Enoch "had bitterness of soul, and wept over his brethren, and said unto the heavens: I will refuse to be comforted." But the Lord lifted Enoch's eyes and his heart through pointing toward the glories of future generations. Enoch looked and "saw the day of the coming of the Son of Man, even in the flesh; and his soul rejoiced" (Moses 7:41-47). Still stunned, however, by the awfulness of the deluge in Noah's day, Enoch sought a promise of the Lord that the earth would never again be destroyed by water. The Lord agreed, and offered the rainbow as a token of that covenant, and also as a reminder of a future day when righteousness would be found once more among the people of God (Moses 7:50-51; cf. JST, Gen. 9:21-25).

 

Enoch beheld the times of restitution of all things, the Dispensation of the Fulness of Times; the day when righteousness would be sent down out of heaven, and truth—in the form of the Book of Mormon, for example—would come forth out of the earth, all given to bear witness of the truths of salvation; the gathering of the elect in the latter days and the eventual establishment of a modern Zion, the New Jerusalem, to be built in Independence, Missouri; the return of the city of Enoch at the time of the Second Coming, and the glorious reunion of Zion from above and Zion from beneath. Finally, Enoch saw in vision the Savior's introduction of the millennial reign, the period wherein "for the space of a thousand years the earth shall rest." The account of Enoch's mighty vision closes on this note: "And the Lord showed Enoch all things, even unto the end of the world; and he saw the day of the righteous, the hour of their redemption, and received a fulness of joy" (Moses 7:62-67).

 

The City of Enoch

 

Enoch's preaching and example led to the establishment of a city of holiness, which came to be known as Zion. The marvelous distillation expression, so descriptive of this social order, is given as follows: "And the Lord called his people Zion, because they were of one heart and one mind, and dwelt in righteousness; and there was no poor among them" (Moses 7:18). The powers of the Holy Ghost are of an enlivening and enlightening nature. Because of its purging and cleansing actions, the Spirit brings about vital changes in the character and composition of its recipients. Those who put their trust in the Spirit of God are led to do good, "yea to do justly, to walk humbly, to judge righteously" (D&C 11:12), to truly love their neighbors as themselves. President Spencer W. Kimball has taught:

 

Zion is a name given by the Lord to his covenant people, who are characterized by purity of heart and faithfulness in caring for the poor, the needy, and the distressed (see D&C 97:21).

 

This highest order of priesthood society is founded on the doctrines of love, service, work, self-reliance, and stewardship, all of which are circumscribed by the covenant of consecration. fn

 

Enoch's society—including social and economic aspects—grounded, as we suppose, in the principles and practices of consecration and stewardship, fn stands as the scriptural prototype for all cities that aspire to become known as Zion—a society made up of the pure in heart (D&C 97:21). Elder Orson Pratt wrote:

 

One of the most beautiful characteristics of the antediluvian Zion, was that "they were of one heart and one mind, and there was no poor among them," a perfect union of sentiment and feelings: no bitterness—no hatred—no slandering or reviling—no defrauding or taking advantage one of another—no person seeking to aggrandize himself by heaping up riches while others were poor—no selfishness or pride—no hypocrisy or affectation: but every one loved his neighbor as himself—every one studied the welfare of the whole—every one considered himself as only a steward over the things committed to his charge: it was all considered the Lord's, and ready to be appropriated for any purpose which the Lord should direct. They were equal in earthly things, therefore the Lord made them equal in heavenly things. Nothing short of continued revelation could ever have brought about an order of things so perfect. fn

 

Enoch's closeness to the things of God (and thus his exalted perception), was critical in the achievement of heaven on earth. Elder Joseph Young suggested:

 

From these revelations it may be inferred that the disciples of Enoch were gathered together. At his suggestion they built a city, on the site which he had selected. He had seen the heavens opened; had gazed upon cities that were celestial; had been familiar with the gorgeousness of the heavenly mansions, and the splendor of their architecture. Acquiring thereby a superior intelligence and the spirit of refinement and taste, which enabled him to instruct his brethren to build after the pattern of the heavenly.

 

The gathering of the people and the building of the city increased and continued for a great length of time, until it was consummated. The form, the order and architecture of the buildings of the city of Enoch, presented to the eye a glory and splendor surpassing our sublimest conceptions of art. The gardens, orchards and vineyards; the lawns, shades and floral fields, partaking of the best selection of fruits, flowers and evergreens that could be collected, from far and near. Such had been the perfection attained by the favored persons who had listened to the voice and preaching of Enoch, and who comprised the inhabitants of the city. fn

 

Those who fully abide by the laws of the celestial kingdom eventually qualify for the blessings of the kingdom, including the presence of the Lord himself. In the city of Enoch "the Lord came and dwelt with his people" (Moses 7:16), spoke in their congregations, fn and walked and talked with the pure in heart. "Such union," wrote Elder Orson Pratt, "was strength and power; such oneness was after the order of heaven: the powers of the earth could not hold them—the laws of nature could not retain them: their faith laid hold on immortality—on eternal life—on the powers of heaven—on heavenly things; the veil was parted and could no more be closed." fn Similarly, Elder Joseph Young explained that Joseph Smith had taught that "the people, and the city, and the foundations of the earth on which it stood, had partaken of so much of the immortal elements, bestowed upon them by God through the teachings of Enoch, that it became philosophically impossible for them to remain any longer upon the earth." fn After a ministry spanning more than three centuries, therefore, Enoch had prepared his people to enter into the rest of the Lord. "Then he obtained power," President Brigham Young observed, "to translate himself and his people, with the region they inhabited, their houses, gardens, fields, cattle, and all their possessions. He had learned enough from Adam and his associates to known how to handle the elements, . . . and he obtained power to take his portion of the earth and move out a little while, where he remains to this day." fn

 

And all the days of Zion, in the days of Enoch, were three hundred and sixty-five years.

 

And Enoch and all his people walked with God, and he dwelt in the midst of Zion; and it came to pass that Zion was not, for God received it up into his own bosom; and from thence went forth the saying, ZION IS FLED (Moses 7:68-69). fn

 

Enoch and his people were translated. Their bodies were changed in such a manner that they could have power over death, and such that they would never experience bodily pain. They were lifted spiritually to a terrestrial state. fn In the words of Elder Bruce R. McConkie, "those who were translated before the resurrection of our Lord"—which would include Enoch and his city—"'were with Christ in his resurrection' (D&C 133:55). Those who have been translated since the resurrection of Christ"—such as John the Revelator and the Three Nephites—"shall continue to live as mortals until the Second Coming when they shall receive their immortal glory. It will be resurrected, not translated beings, who shall return with the city of Enoch." fn

 

The Return of the City of Enoch

 

In a revelation to the Church given in March of 1831, the "God of Enoch" spoke of the ancient Zion as having been "separated from the earth, and . . . received unto myself—a city reserved until a day of righteousness shall come" (D&C 45:11-12). In detailing the astral phenomena incident to the Second Coming, the Lord explained to his meridian Twelve: "And, as I said before, after the tribulation of those days, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken, then shall appear the sign of the Son of Man in heaven, and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn; and they shall see the Son of Man coming in the clouds of heaven, with power and great glory" (JS-M 36). In commenting upon this passage, the Prophet Joseph Smith said: "There will be was and rumors of wars, signs in the heavens above and on the earth beneath. . . . Then will appear one grand sign of the Son of Man in heaven. But what will the world do? They will say it is a planet, a comet, etc." fn One wonders: Could such a dramatic occasion be the re-appearance of the City of Enoch? fn Whatever the nature of this future event, we know by revelation that Enoch and his colony of ancient Saints will return to the earth to enjoy the glories of the millennium and the reign of the King of Kings and Lord of Lords. The description of the return is given beautifully in the Pearl of Great Price: "And the Lord said unto Enoch: Then shalt thou and all thy city meet them [those of the New Jerusalem] there, and we will receive them into our bosom, and they shall see us, and we will fall upon their necks, and they shall fall upon our necks, and we will kiss each other; And there shall be mine abode, and it shall be Zion, which shall come forth out of all the creations which I have made; and for the space of a thousand years the earth shall rest" (Moses 7:63-64).

 

Noah was instructed by God concerning a covenant made with Enoch, and of the rainbow as a token or reminder of that covenant.

 

And the bow shall be in the cloud; and I will look upon it, that I may remember the everlasting covenant, which I made unto thy father Enoch; that, when men should keep all my commandments, Zion should again come on the earth, the city of Enoch which I have caught up unto myself.

 

And this is mine everlasting covenant, that when thy posterity shall embrace the truth, and look upward, then shall Zion look downward, and all the heavens shake with gladness, and the earth shall tremble with joy;

 

And the general assembly of the church of the firstborn shall come down out of heaven, and possess the earth and shall have place until the end come. And this is mine everlasting covenant, which I made with thy father Enoch (JST, Gen. 9:21-23).

 

 

(Robert L. Millet and Kent P. Jackson, eds., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 2: The Pearl of Great Price [Salt Lake City: Randall Book, 1985], 136.)

 

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 45:17.)

 

17 For as ye have looked upon the long absence of your spirits from your bodies to be a bondage, I will show unto you how the day of redemption shall come, and also the restoration of the scattered Israel.

 

Why the Resurrection Is So Important

 

With so much scriptural emphasis on the resurrection, it is natural to wonder why it is so important. Why could we not simply continue into eternity as spirit beings without the physical body? In the New Testament the account of Jesus’ resurrection is beautifully given; but it is in latter-day revelation that we learn why it was so important.

 

The resurrection of our individual bodies is important because our Heavenly Father has a resurrected body of flesh and bone (see D&C 130:22), as has our Heavenly Mother. It would be possible to continue in eternity as spirit bodies without the physical body, but as such we could not reach the fulness of salvation. A spirit body without a resurrected physical body cannot obtain a fulness of joy (see D&C 93:33-34). The revelations inform us that the spirits of mankind in the world of spirits, where they go when they depart from this mortal life, wish to have their bodies, and look upon the long absence from their bodies as a bondage (D&C 45:17; 138:50).

 

 The Prophet Joseph Smith discussed the eternal significance of the body, and also of the devil’s dilemma in having no body: “We came to this earth that we might have a body and present it pure before God in the celestial kingdom. The great principle of happiness consists in having a body. The devil has no body, and herein is his punishment. He is pleased when he can obtain the tabernacle of man, and when cast out by the Savior he asked to go into the herd of swine, showing that he would prefer a swine’s body to having none.” (Joseph Fielding Smith, comp. Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith. Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1976, 181.)

 

And also: “Perhaps there are principles here that few men have thought of. No person can have this salvation except through a tabernacle.... The greatness of [Lucifer’s] punishment is that he shall not have a tabernacle. This is his punishment.” (Joseph Fielding Smith, comp. Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith. Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1976, 297.)

 

Resurrection Is a Priesthood Ordinance

 

Paul, in his great treatise on resurrection in 1 Cor. 15, poses two questions: “How are the dead raised up? And with what body do they come?” (v. 35.) He then proceeds to answer these questions in the remainder of the chapter and explains that all will rise from the dead, but not with the same glory (verses 29-42). Yet, says Paul, regardless of the degree of glory, all will receive a body that is immortal and incorruptible (vss. 42-44). We have already discussed the important fact that in the resurrection each receives the same body which was the “natural body,” the body our spirit lived in during mortality (D&C 88:28). It will, of course, have become immortal by then.

 

 In response to Paul’s question as to “How are the dead raised up?” we have the further teachings of Apostles and prophets in this dispensation that resurrection is a priesthood ordinance, and will be conducted in an orderly, assigned manner, agreeable to the established order of the kingdom. Both President Brigham Young (Journal of Discourses. 26 vols. Photo Lithographic Reprint. Los Angeles: General Printing and Lithograph Co., 1961 6:275; 15:136-39) and Elder Erastus Snow (Journal of Discourses. 26 vols. Photo Lithographic Reprint. Los Angeles: General Printing and Lithograph Co., 1961 25:34) taught that the resurrection will be conducted much as other things are done in the kingdom, by those in authority and by delegation. The procedure is that as one cannot baptize himself, nor can he baptize others until he himself is baptized and ordained, so one cannot resurrect himself, but will be called forth by someone in authority. Men will be given the keys of this ordinance after they are resurrected, and then they can resurrect others. President Young also indicates that the Prophet Joseph Smith will be the first person resurrected in this dispensation. He will receive the keys and give them to others.

 

In general conference of April 1977, President Spencer W. Kimball quoted President Brigham Young: “We are in possession of all the ordinances that can be administered in the flesh; but there are other ordinances and administrations that must be administered beyond this world. I know you would like to ask what they are. I will mention one. We have not, neither can we receive here, the ordinance and the keys of resurrection.” (Journal of Discourses. 26 vols. Photo Lithographic Reprint. Los Angeles: General Printing and Lithograph Co., 1961 15:137; Conference reports of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, April 1977, p. 69.)

 

Any doctrine or ordinance as fundamental to man’s eternal salvation as the resurrection of the dead is of necessity regulated and performed by the keys of the Melchizedek Priesthood. It is also part of the patriarchal order of the family. So far as the celestial kingdom is concerned, the resurrection is a family event. We would at first naturally suppose that Jesus would resurrect himself, but perhaps he did not. Jesus did not baptize himself. The clear rendering of Acts 2:22-24,  32;  3:12;  5:30 (as cited above) represents Peter saying on three separate occasions that God raised up Jesus from the dead. If we read those passages literally and combine that concept with the teachings of President Young and Elder Snow, that only a resurrected being can perform a resurrection, we may gain an insight into the resurrection process as a patriarchal family order in which a righteous resurrected father would resurrect his son, and so forth.

 

A curious observation in John 20:4-7 indicates that as Peter and John looked into the empty tomb they saw the linen clothes in which Jesus had been wrapped. The napkin which had been about his head was in a separate place, neatly folded. Something about the arrangement of the linen was sufficient to attract the attention of these two Brethren and also rate a special notice in John’s testimony. Whatever else is meant, the impression is that Jesus had come forth from the dead in orderly, dignified fashion, and took time to fold the clothing.

 

 After Jesus’ resurrection, many of the Saints whose bodies were in their graves around Jerusalem arose and came into the city and appeared to many (Matt. 27:52-54). A similar resurrection took place in the western hemisphere (3 Ne. 23:9-13).

 

The Law of Resurrection

 

Resurrection is necessary because of the fall of Adam. The law governing the resurrection is stated in Alma 11:42-45, and specifically provides that all shall rise from the dead, the body restored to the spirit, no parts missing, and the resurrected person restored to the presence of God for judgment. That a judgment should come after the resurrection of the body is reasonable, because we will be judged of the deeds done while in the body (Alma 5:15). In the most absolute and definite terms it is stated that once a person is resurrected, that person can never die a physical death again; the spirit and the body are united, never to be divided (Alma 11:45).

 

Such fundamental guidelines to the process of resurrection can direct our thinking and enlarge our comprehension of the eternal plan of salvation. For example, the question is often asked; “Is Jesus the Savior of worlds in addition to this earth?” The correct answer is “Yes,” according to the scriptures (D&C 76:24; 88:24) and the teachings of the Brethren. Next question: “Did Jesus have to suffer and die on any other worlds to redeem them, as he did on this earth?” The answer, based on the provisions of Alma 11, cited above, can only be, “No.” The fact that he was born, died, and resurrected on this earth-these being one-time events–demonstrates that he had never done these things elsewhere, or he would not have been able to do them here. And having done them on this earth, he cannot repeat them anywhere else. We see how unique our own world is in the universe. This earth is called God’s footstool (D&C 38:17). On this earth Jesus Christ obtained his only physical body, and on this earth he was resurrected with that same body, and on this earth he will stand again and reign in his body throughout eternity (see D&C 130:9).

 

 

(Robert J. Matthews, Behold the Messiah [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1994], 287.)

 

 

Some find the Church too restrictive:  Elder John Groberg said the following –

 

I hear some people say, “The gospel is too restrictive.” But we must look at the other side. It is really not restrictive at all. It is hope-giving. It gives us a pattern to follow whereby we can gain hope. There is hope, and that is what the Church is about. That is what the Savior is about. He came to give us hope.

 

We must change, and we can. The message of the gospel of Jesus Christ is, “I can change; there is always hope.” We can choose and improve and become as He is.

 

Remember the quotation from 1 Jn. 3:2-3: “Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is. And every man that hath this hope in him purifieth himself, even as he is pure.”

 

Hope is a purifying, refining process.

 

(Hope [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1994],.)

 

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter day Saints exists to get us ready for the Millennium, which gets us ready for the Celestial kingdom.  Repentance is a change of heart, part of our preparation.

 

The term “Free Agency” is a misnomer, agency is never “free”, and our choices have lasting consequences.  There is free will, and freedom to choose.

 

The Terms Free Agency and Moral Agency

Boyd K. Packer

The phrase "free agency" does not appear in scripture. The only agency spoken of there is moral agency, "which," the Lord said, "I have given unto him, that every man may be accountable for his own sins in the day of judgment." (D&C 101:78; italics added.) ["Our Moral Environment," Ensign, May 1992, p. 67]

Life is meant to be a test to see if we will keep the commandments of God. (See 2 Ne. 2:5.) We are free to obey or to ignore the spirit and the letter of the law. But the agency granted to man is a moral agency. (See D&C 101:78.) We are not free to break our covenants and escape the consequences. ("Covenants," Ensign, Nov. 1990, p. 84)

 

Spencer J. Condie

I am indebted to President Boyd K. Packer, who made us aware of the fact that the term free agency appears nowhere in holy writ. Instead, the scriptures generally speak of agency or free will, but when agency is modified, it is referred to as "moral agency" (D&C 101:78; emphasis added). Because the term free agency has been used by various modern prophets, I use the terms free agency and moral agency interchangeably, aware that the latter term is more correct. ("Agency: The Gift of Choices," Ensign, Sept. 1995, p. 18)

 

The highest degree in the celestial kingdom has full agency because greater laws were obeyed.

Other degrees of glory are also kingdoms of agency, but not of a fulness.

 

Premortal existence, not preexistence, since we have always existed use terms of the standard works (No scriptural foundation for free agency or unconditional love.)

 

(Moses 7:60-61.)

 

60 And the Lord said unto Enoch: As I live, even so will I come in the last days, in the days of wickedness and vengeance, to fulfil the oath which I have made unto you concerning the children of Noah;

 

61 And the day shall come that the earth shall rest, but before that day the heavens shall be darkened, and a veil of darkness shall cover the earth; and the heavens shall shake, and also the earth; and great tribulations shall be among the children of men, but my people will I preserve;

 

Joseph Smith received this before revelations on the doctrine of consecration.  Spiritual blindness covers the earth but God’s people will be preserved (temporally and spiritually).  Enoch is promised there would be no more floods to cover the earth but there would be fire.

 

Oath & Covenant of the Priesthood – Oath is on God’s side, Covenant is what we make with God.

 

Teachings of Wilford Woodruff – He talks about the 1st meeting in the upper room of the Red Brick Store.  I need to find this story.

 

Moses 7:64 – The millennium will last 1000 years and the earth shall rest.

 

There is a lot of scripture written about Abraham.

 

 

Marriage Sealing

Abrahamic Covenant

 

Genesis 12:1-3 – Abraham 2:6

 

Mortal Promises                                                                              Eternal Blessings

 

1.  Abraham will have children (seed)                                       1.  Eternal Increase

 

2.  His children will have a land of promise                               2.  Thrones, kingdoms, everything

                                                                                                God has (Celestial)

3.  Posterity will have the gospel (noble & great)                      3.  Godhood, Eternal Lives

     Privilege to bless all nations

 

Promises 1 & 2 are the means by which we obtain the eternal blessings

 

Earth is God’s footstool, we don’t own a thing, and we only own our agency that was given to us by God.  Free will precedes agency

 

Abraham was raised in an environment without few will.  God is giving them land where they can be in control and exercise free will.

 

(Abraham 2:11.)

 

11 And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse them that curse thee; and in thee (that is, in thy Priesthood) and in thy seed (that is, thy Priesthood), for I give unto thee a promise that this right shall continue in thee, and in thy seed after thee (that is to say, the literal seed, or the seed of the body) shall all the families of the earth be blessed, even with the blessings of the Gospel, which are the blessings of salvation, even of life eternal.

 

The right is earned by performance in premortality, the noble and great come through a particular lineage.  However, because of the Fall it has become a privilege.

 

In the spirit world there were some who were valiant—more valiant than others—in choosing to do good, and thus they became the noble and great ones of whom the Lord said, "These I will make my rulers" (Abraham 3:23), and so in this earth, coming through a chosen lineage, those noble and great ones are expected, as members of the Church and kingdom of God in every age, to be rulers of the world of sin and wickedness.

(Elder Harold B. Lee, Conference Report, October 1945, Afternoon Meeting 46.)

 

Election of Grace will be initiated by the Abrahamic Covenant.

 

How the Law of Election Operates

 

Paul here tells how the election of grace fits into the gospel scheme. His Roman readers knew what he was talking about because they already understood the doctrine of election. Since the sectarian world has little or no comprehension of pre-existence and eternal progression, upon which doctrines the principles of election are based, it is no wonder that these and other teachings of Paul are so completely misconstrued by them.

 

This doctrine of the election of grace is as follows: "As part of the new song the saints will sing when they 'see eye to eye' and the millennial era has been ushered in will be these words, 'The Lord hath redeemed his people, Israel, According to the election of grace, Which was brought to pass by the faith And covenant of their fathers.' (D. & C. 84:98-102; Rom. 11:1-5.) This election of grace is a very fundamental, logical, and important part of God's dealings with men through the ages. To bring to pass the salvation of the greatest possible number of his spirit children the Lord, in general, sends the most righteous and worthy saints to earth through the lineage of Abraham and Jacob. This course is a manifestation of his grace or in other words his love, mercy, and condescension toward his children.

 

"This election to a chosen lineage is based on pre-existent worthiness and is thus made 'according to the foreknowledge of God.' (1 Pet. 1:2.) Those so grouped together during their mortal probation have more abundant opportunities to make and keep the covenants of salvation, a right which they earned by pre-existent devotion to the cause of righteousness. As part of this election, Abraham and others of the noble and great spirits were chosen before they were born for the particular missions assigned them in this life. (Abra. 3:22-24; Rom. 9.)

 

“As with every basic doctrine of the gospel, the Lord's system of election based on pre-existent faithfulness has been changed and perverted by an apostate Christendom. So absurd have been the false conclusions reached in this field that millions of sincere though deceived persons have devoutly believed that in accordance with the divine will men were pre-destined to receive salvation or damnation which no act on their part could change. (Teachings, p. 189.)

 

"Actually, if the full blessings of salvation are to follow, the doctrine of election must operate twice. First, righteous spirits are elected or chosen to come to mortality as heirs of special blessings. Then, they must be called and elected again in this life, an occurrence which takes place when they join the true Church. (D. & C. 53:1.) Finally, in order to reap eternal salvation, they must press forward in obedient devotion to the truth until they make their 'calling and election sure' (2 Pet. 1), that is, are 'sealed up unto eternal life.' (D. & C. 131:5.)" (Mormon Doctrine, 2nd ed., pp. 216-217.)

 

 

(Bruce R. McConkie, Doctrinal New Testament Commentary, 3 vols. [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1965-1973], 2: 273.)

 

 

 

BIBLE DICTIONARY
ELECTION

A theological term primarily denoting God’s choice of the house of Israel to be the covenant people with privileges and responsibilities, that they might become a means of blessing to the whole world (Rom. 9: 11; Rom. 11: 5, 7, 28). Election is an opportunity for service and is both on a national and an individual basis. On a national basis the seed of Abraham carry the gospel to the world. But it is by individual faithfulness that it is done.

The elect are chosen even “before the foundation of the world,” yet no one is unconditionally elected to eternal life. Each must, for himself, hearken to the gospel and receive its ordinances and covenants from the hands of the servants of the Lord in order to obtain salvation. If one is elected but does not serve, his election could be said to have been in vain, as Paul expressed in 2 Cor. 6: 1.

We see that elections are not all of the same kind. Since election has to do with God’s choice of persons or groups to accomplish his purposes, some may be elected by him to one thing and some to another. Although the Lord uses certain individuals to accomplish his purposes, it does not necessarily follow that these persons will automatically receive a fulness of salvation thereby. For instance, Nebuchadnezzar and Cyrus fulfilled certain purposes in the economy of God, but they apparently did it for their own reasons and not as conscious acts of faith and righteousness. On the other hand, salvation of one’s soul comes only by personal integrity and willing obedience to the laws and ordinances of the gospel of Jesus Christ. Thus there are some elections to be desired over others. An “election of grace” spoken of in D&C 84: 98-102 and Rom. 11: 1-5 has reference to one’s situation in mortality; that is, being born at a time, at a place, and in circumstances where one will come in favorable contact with the gospel. This election took place in the premortal existence. Those who are faithful and diligent in the gospel in mortality receive an even more desirable election in this life, and become the elect of God. These receive the promise of a fulness of God’s glory in eternity (D&C 84: 33-41).

The concept held by many that God unconditionally elected some to be saved and some to be damned without any effort, action, or choice on their part is not correct, for the scriptures teach that it is only by faith and obedience that one’s calling and election is made sure (2 Pet. 1; D&C 131: 5).

D&C 84:98-102 – Romans 11:1-5

 

Election of Grace – Being born at a time, at a place, and in circumstances where one can come in favorable contact with the gospel. 

 

Ideal Election – Born in the Covenant

 

 

Abraham was shown the organization of spirits prior to their coming into mortality. Directing Abraham’s attention to the assembly of “noble and great ones,” God said, “These I will make my rulers; for he stood among those that were spirits, and he saw that they were good; and he said unto me: Abraham, thou art one of them; thou wast chosen before thou wast born” (Abr. 3:22–23). In what appears to have been a similar vision, President Joseph F. Smith said: “I observed that they [the Prophet Joseph Smith, his father, Hyrum Smith, Brigham Young, John Taylor, Wilford Woodruff, and other choice spirits] were also among the noble and great ones who were chosen in the beginning to be rulers in the Church of God. Even before they were born, they, with many others, received their first lessons in the world of spirits and were prepared to come forth in the due time of the Lord to labor in his vineyard for the salvation of the souls of men.” (D&C 138:53–56.) Joseph Smith explained that “every man who has a calling to minister to the inhabitants of the world was ordained to that very purpose in the Grand Council of heaven before this world was.” He then added modestly, “I suppose I was ordained to this very office in that Grand Council.” (Teachings, p. 365.) So it was that the Father “called all spirits before Him at the creation of man, and organized them. He (Adam) is the head.” (Ibid., p. 158.) Chief among the organizational arrangements and foreordinations in the premortal existence was the organization of lineage and family. Offices and positions in the Church or earthly kingdom would be important, but these would be only for a time and a season, while relationships associated with the family are to endure throughout the endless eternities.

 

Christ was chosen and called in the Grand Council of Heaven to be the Only Begotten in the flesh and thus the Savior or Redeemer of all mankind. Prophets and Apostles and all who were designated to receive the priesthood and significant roles in the Lord’s plan and program were also in like manner forechosen and foredesignated. The house of Israel and the Saints of all ages were also designated according to the election of grace to receive the gospel at a certain time and season. They in turn were to be messengers of those truths to the rest of God’s children. Thus they were foreordained to be baptized, endowed, and clothed in the authority of the priesthood and to be witnesses of the principles of salvation among all peoples. All of this was in accordance to the heed and diligence they gave to the law of the gospel as it was presented to them in their first estate.

 

In our pre-earth estate, death and suffering were unknown to us. In that day we were spirits free from the lusts and passions of the flesh. Disease, physical appetites, and weariness were unknown. Nevertheless we had agency, which implies that there were important choices to be made, choices between what we would believe and what we would not believe, choices relative to the causes we would support and those we would not support, choices relative to the preparations we would make for this mortal sojourn and to the talents we would seek to develop, choices between that which was good and that which was not good. This is obvious from the fact that one third of the host of heaven became sons of perdition, meaning they were hopelessly lost.

 

The laws of our pre-earth society, the laws that we were schooled to live, were gospel laws. Chosen brethren held the holy priesthood and used it not only in the creation of the earth but in positions of authority in which they were called to teach, lead, and direct their brothers and sisters. Certainly there was a church organization wherein we aided and schooled each other in understanding and living the gospel plan. Through the experiences of the first estate, men and women developed talents which they now possess. We bring with us the degree of spirituality and intelligence we acquired while yet in the presence of God. There were musicians, mathematicians, artists, orators, persuasive personalities, wise men, and on and on among the premortal hosts, even as there are among us now. Abraham saw in vision the noble and great spirits while they yet dwelt in the Divine Presence, meaning he saw those who had acquired the talent for spirituality and leadership. We are born with every talent, capacity, and aptitude we gained by obedience to law while in our premortal estate. As to mortal life, we know that “if a person gains more knowledge and intelligence in this life through his diligence and obedience than another, he will have so much the advantage in the world to come” (see D&C 130:18–19). This principle is surely true in describing the manner in which our first estate dictates our place and position in mortality.

 

 

(Joseph Fielding McConkie, Joseph Smith: The Choice Seer [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1996],.)

 

 

Premortality – 3 Groups

 

Valiant – very obedient – Right of the gospel

Less Valiant – Not as obedient – Don’t have gospel rights unless the gospel is preached to them

 

Rebellious – Followers of Satan, they want our bodies

 

The Latter-day Saint view of the physical body is unusually optimistic in the Christian world. The body is corrupt in the sense that it is decaying and dying. The flesh is the means by which a fallen nature comes into being and thus the means by which sin and sorrow emerge. But the body is also the tabernacle of the human spirit and is, in conjunction with that spirit, a vital part of the living soul that will rise in the resurrection. Satan and his followers do not have a body. They are spirits; their consuming desire to possess a body is manifest in the New Testament account of the devils entering the Gadarene swine. (See Mark 5:1-13; Luke 8:26-33.) Joseph Smith taught, "We came to this earth that we might have a body and present it pure before God in the celestial kingdom [the highest heaven]. The great principle of happiness consists in having a body. The devil has no body, and herein is his punishment. . . . All beings who have bodies have power over those who have not. “Teachings, p 181, 190 Also, "Salvation is nothing more nor less than to triumph over all our enemies and put them under our feet. . . . No person can have this salvation except through a tabernacle, “Teachings, p 297 meaning, of course, a physical body.

 

(Robert L. Millet, The Mormon Faith: Understanding Restored Christianity [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1998], 59 - 60.)

 

 

Why did the demons desire to enter the bodies of the swine? Or, for that matter, how came they to take up tenancy in the body of the man? We cannot tell and do not know how it is that evil spirits—few or many—gain entrance into the bodies of mortal men. We do know that all things are governed by law, and that Satan is precluded from taking possession of the bodies of the prophets and other righteous people. Were it not so, the work of God would be thwarted—always and in all instances—for Lucifer leads the armies of hell against all men, and more especially against those who are instrumental in furthering the Lord's work.

 

There must be circumstances of depression and sin and physical weakness that, within the restrictions of divine control, permit evil spirits to enter human bodies. We do know their curse is to be denied tabernacles, and we surmise that the desire for such tenancy is so great that they, when permitted, even enter the bodies of beasts.

 

And it may be, in this instance, that the devils, ejected from their ill-gotten home by a power they could not resist, sought to thwart His work by the next-best expedient available to them—that of destroying the livelihood of many people, so they would rise up in anger against Him who destroyed their craft. And, in fact, this is what happened.

 

When they who fed the swine saw what was done, "they fled, and went and told it in the city and in the country." The word was noised about in Gerasa and Gadara and the whole countryside. All the people were stirred up to a high point of wonder and amazement. The owners of the swine, those who knew the healed demoniac, and all who heard of the wondrous happenings hastened "to see what was done." They "came to Jesus, and found the man, out of whom the devils were departed, sitting at the feet of Jesus, clothed, and in his right mind: and they were afraid."

 

 

(Bruce R. McConkie, The Mortal Messiah: From Bethlehem to Calvary, 4 vols. [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1979-1981], 2: 282.)

 

 

 

 

 

D&C 132 – Abraham Paradigm

 

 

 

Paradigm = Pattern

 

D&C 132 – Plural marriage (term used when God commands it and is sanctioned by Him)

 

There are biblical examples of plural marriage and an example of one marriage not sanctioned by God.

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 132:29-37.)

 

29 Abraham received all things, whatsoever he received, by revelation and commandment, by my word, saith the Lord, and hath entered into his exaltation and sitteth upon his throne.

 

30 Abraham received promises concerning his seed, and of the fruit of his loins—from whose loins ye are, namely, my servant Joseph—which were to continue so long as they were in the world; and as touching Abraham and his seed, out of the world they should continue; both in the world and out of the world should they continue as innumerable as the stars; or, if ye were to count the sand upon the seashore ye could not number them.

 

31 This promise is yours also, because ye are of Abraham, and the promise was made unto Abraham; and by this law is the continuation of the works of my Father, wherein he glorifieth himself.

 

32 Go ye, therefore, and do the works of Abraham; enter ye into my law and ye shall be saved.

 

33 But if ye enter not into my law ye cannot receive the promise of my Father, which he made unto Abraham.

 

34 God commanded Abraham, and Sarah gave Hagar to Abraham to wife. And why did she do it? Because this was the law; and from Hagar sprang many people. This, therefore, was fulfilling, among other things, the promises.

 

35 Was Abraham, therefore, under condemnation? Verily I say unto you, Nay; for I, the Lord, commanded it.

 

36 Abraham was commanded to offer his son Isaac; nevertheless, it was written: Thou shalt not kill. Abraham, however, did not refuse, and it was accounted unto him for righteousness.

 

37 Abraham received concubines, and they bore him children; and it was accounted unto him for righteousness, because they were given unto him, and he abode in my law; as Isaac also and Jacob did none other things than that which they were commanded; and because they did none other things than that which they were commanded, they have entered into their exaltation, according to the promises, and sit upon thrones, and are not angels but are gods.

 

Abraham received all things by revelation and commandment.  Do the works of Abraham and enter into my law and you shall be saved.

 

Abraham Paradigm – (Pattern of how to acquire Godhood)

 

  1. All of his actions are done by revelation and commandment, and he enters into his exaltation or has attained exaltation and Godhood.

 

    1. Abraham received promises concerning his seed, verse 30
    2. Abraham and his seed should continue out of this world as innumerable as the stars
    3. This promise is yours also because you are of Abraham, verse 31

 

       2.  Faith with obedience is acting without seeing the end; we should do all that God commands us.           

            Abraham received 5 concubines (slave wives), it was their cultural norm, not ours, vs. 37

 

We have been bought with a cost; Christ has redeemed us from our fallen condition.  We covenant to obey God and Christ and as slaves, we take upon us God’s name and then He gives us everything He has.  This is a positive connotation of slavery, we have a bad connotation of the word because of mans inhumanity to man her in mortality (Satan’s rule).

 

 

(1 Corinthians 7:23.)

 

23 Ye are bought with a price; be not ye the servants of men.

 

 

Thus he describes those whom he has redeemed in the language of belonging and possession. As Paul wrote, "Ye are bought with a price." (1 Cor. 7:231 Corinthians 7:23.) Similarly, the Lord said of the Saints in Missouri: "Yet I will own them, and they shall be mine in that day when I shall come to make up my jewels." (D&C 101:3; emphasis added.)

 

Among the Lord's most intimate and personal reassurances to us are his words in modern revelation to the children of Christ, teaching us that belonging to him in this doctrinally based sense is the ultimate source of safety and peace—the spiritual fulfillment of our amae: "Fear not, little children, for ye are mine, and I have overcome the world, and you are of them that my Father hath given me; and none of them that my Father hath given me shall be lost." (D&C 50:41-42; emphasis added.)

 

The doctrine of belonging to Christ clearly derives from his Atonement: "Look unto me in every thought; doubt not, fear not. Behold, the wounds which pierced my side, and also the prints of the nails in my hands and feet." (D&C 6:37.)

 

Does it matter that these supernal promises to us find their source in his Atonement? At an earlier time in our lives, we were generally aware that the Lord blesses and helps us in times of need, but we did not see the connection between those blessings and the Atonement. We saw things much as did another Church member who once wrote in a personal letter that "although the Savior can heal many of our pains, this has nothing to do with the atonement." He believed that "through the Spirit of Christ and the Holy Ghost we can be comforted from the stresses of this world, but the Atonement is only for the sins of mankind." What, then, does the Atonement-based theology of belonging—"the doctrine of Christ" (2 Nephi 31:21) as well as the teachings of the last supper—tell us about the relationship between being "his people" and being healed by his Atonement?

 

 

(Bruce C. Hafen and Marie K. Hafen, The Belonging: The Atonement and Relationships with God and Family Heart [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1994], 149.)

 

 

Ingratitude

 

See ATONEMENT OF CHRIST, THANKSGIVING. Among all sins, none is so prevalent as the sin of ingratitude. It consists in failure to keep the commandments of God. Men have been "bought with a price" (1 Cor. 6:20; 1 Cor. 7:23; 2 Pet. 2:1), the price of the blood and suffering of our Lord. Because they have been so purchased they are redeemed from death and have opportunity to gain eternal life. Since they now belong to the Lord, he having paid so great a price for them, it is his right to expect them to keep the commandments. By failing to do so they manifest gross ingratitude for all that has been done for them. (Doctrines of Salvation, vol. 1, pp. 131-133.)

 

 

(Bruce R. McConkie, Mormon Doctrine, 2d ed. [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1966], 380.)

 

 

The story of the Prodigal Son shows how he would rather be a slave in his Father’s house then continuing to have freedom while eating with the pigs.

 

 

Hagar is a slave to Sarah; all children coming from Hagar are Sarah’s.  Hagar ridicules Sarah for not being able to have children, while she can.

 

For women her crowning item is having children and being able to have children in the eternities (meaning of eternal lives).  Men have the priesthood to have balance between man and woman, yet women have access to the priesthood also.

 

Large families were necessary in an agricultural society because of the need for workers.

 

The House of the Father – House of Israel (Jacob)

 

4 wives – 4 houses – when the sons come there will be more houses, multigenerational family

 

 

Jacob

 

                                                Leah                                        Rachel

 

                                    Zilpah                                                              Bilhah

 

 

 

                                               From these came the 12 Tribes of Israel

 

 

 

The birthright son takes over the house of the father, Jacob’s 1st born son Reuben lost his birthright so it went to Joseph.

 

 

(Genesis 12:1.)

 

1 Now the LORD had said unto Abram, Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father's house, unto a land that I will shew thee:

 

Abraham is to make his own house.  He is leaving the house of his father and the land and large workforce, which means his earthly security.

 

Genesis 23 – Sarah dies.  Abraham doesn’t have any land to bury his wife.  He won’t receive his own land during mortality.  Others give him a place to bury his wife.

 

Life goes according to the Lord’s timetable, not mans.  The Lord promised Abraham many great things, but they won’t happen during mortality, great patience and understanding of the Lord’s ways, (FAITH).

 

 

(Genesis 12:4-5.)

 

4 So Abram departed, as the LORD had spoken unto him; and Lot went with him: and Abram was seventy and five years old when he departed out of Haran.

 

5 And Abram took Sarai his wife, and Lot his brother's son, and all their substance that they had gathered, and the souls that they had gotten in Haran; and they went forth to go into the land of Canaan; and into the land of Canaan they came.

 

 

Abraham was 75 when he departed with his wife and Lot’s family (nephew) and all of the others they had gathered.

 

Sarah was Abraham’s ½ sister (they had the same father, Terah), inter family marriage did not have the connotation it would today.  It kept a large family together for generations

 

When one house takes a wife from another house he is not only taking away a daughter, but a whole generational line.  So a bridal price would be very expensive to compensate for the loss.  The best bride would be a sister or niece or cousin to keep the land and labor force intact.

 

Blood Revenge – when you lose someone in your house by someone else (murder or accident).

 

When culture conflicts with God’s doctrine, we must change the cultural behavior to come into agreement with God’s doctrine

 

Often the Lord gives directions without explanations.  Learn with an attitude of faith, God requires obedience before the blessing.

 

(JST Genesis 17:21-28) – Obedience from Abraham was immediate.

 

21 And God said unto Abraham, as for Sarai thy wife, thou shalt not call her name Sarai, but Sarah thou shalt call her name.

 

22 And I will bless her, and I will give thee a son of her; yea, I will bless her, and she shall be blessed, The mother of nations; kings and people shall be of her.

 

23 Then Abraham fell upon his face and rejoiced, and said in his heart, There shall a child be born unto him that is an hundred years old, and Sarah that is ninety years old shall bear.

 

24 And Abraham said unto God, Oh that Ishmael might live uprightly before thee!

 

25 And God said, Sarah thy wife shall bare thee a son, and thou shalt call his name Isaac; and I will establish my covenant with him also, for an everlasting covenant with his seed after him.

 

26 And as for Ishmael, I have heard thee; Behold, I have blessed him, and will make him fruitful, and will multiply him exceedingly;

 

27 Twelve princes shall he beget, and I will make him a great nation.

 

28 But my covenant will I establish with Isaac, whom Sarah shall bear unto thee at this set time in the next year.

 

When the command to be circumcised was given he obeyed the SAME DAY!

Faith obedience = acting without fully seeing the end.

 

Adam sacrificed by command but did not know why until an angel came told him the reason why, similitude of Christ’s sacrifice for all of us.

 

(JST Genesis 12:10-15.)

 

10 And it came to pass, that when Abram was come into Egypt, the Egyptians beheld the woman, that she was very fair.

 

11 The princes also of Pharaoh saw her, and commanded her to be brought before Pharaoh; and the woman was taken into Pharaoh's house.

 

12 And he entreated Abram well for her sake; and he had sheep, and oxen, and he asses, and menservants, and maidservants, and she asses, and camels.

 

13 And the Lord plagued Pharaoh and his house with great plagues, because of Sarai, Abram's wife.

 

14 And Pharaoh called Abram, and said, What hast thou done unto me in this thing? Why didst thou not tell me that she was thy wife? Why saidst thou, She is my sister? so I might have taken her unto me to wife; now therefore, behold I say unto thee, Take thy wife and go thy way.

 

15 And Pharaoh commanded men concerning him; and they sent him away, and his wife, and all that he had.

 

(JST Genesis 13:1-2.)

 

1 And Abram went up out of Egypt, he, and his wife, and all that he had, and Lot with him, unto the south. And Abram was very rich in cattle, in silver, and in gold.

 

2 And he went on his journey from the south, even to Bethel, unto the place where his tent had been at the beginning, between Bethel and Hai; unto the place of the altar, which he had made there at the first; and there Abram called on the name of the Lord.

 

 

Trials given to Abraham, he loses things very close to him.

 

  1. Sarah going to Pharaoh’s house as his wife, also Gen 20 with King Abimelech
  2. Hagar and Ishmael when they are driven out
  3. Commanded to kill Isaac
  4. Land and inheritance by leaving his home
  5. Attempted sacrifice by one of Pharaohs priests (Facsimile 1)

 

 

Sarah

 

The name Sarah appears in a revelation on marriage (D&C 132:34). Her name was Sarai, which the Lord changed to Sarah, meaning "Princess" (Gen. 17:15; LDSBD, 769). This latter name is most appropriate in terms of her serving as Abraham's queen throughout the eternities.

 

In addition to being Abraham's wife, Sarah was also his half-sister (Gen. 11:29; 20:12). This latter relationship was an important factor in the deception foisted upon the Egyptians, when she was introduced as Abraham's sister rather than his wife. This was done in order to protect Abraham from possible assassination by those who would be fascinated by her and desire her for their own household, for she was a "very fair woman" (Abr. 2:21-25; Gen. 12:10-20).

 

In a similar stratagem involving King Abimelech, the Lord intervened to protect Sarah's virtue (Gen. 20). She died at the age of 127, 38 years before Abraham, and was later buried by him in the cave of Machpelah (Gen. 23:1-2, 19).

 

 

(Hoyt W. Brewster, Jr., Doctrine and Covenants Encyclopedia [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1988], 490.)

 

 

Abraham knew the law of obedience. First of all, "But Sarai was barren; she had no child [Gen. 11:30]." Then Gen. 12:1, "…Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father's house…"

 

He has to get going. Nine and ten: Going on still southward and there was famine in the land (nothing to eat). That's one of the reasons everybody is moving now.

 

Then he gets to Egypt. Then what happens? The Egyptians beheld the woman, and the woman was taken to Pharaoh's house. His wife was taken away from him. Then when Pharaoh found that Abraham was her husband after all, he was indignant and said, "What is this that thou has done unto me?" And they sent him away. In chapter 13: "And the land was not able to bear them…" There was strife. His men fought with his nephew Lot's men because there was not enough grass for the flocks. They had a terrible time (poison wells and things like that going on all the time). Then the five desert chiefs came and made war, the way they are always zeroing in on Israel today. They took Lot and his goods away. Then Abraham had to bring them back again. In Gen. 15:2 he said, "…I go childless, and the steward of my house is this Eliezer of Damascus [still no child]." Then the sacrifice of Abraham. He was still a young man at this time when he was sacrificed (our Facsimile No. 1 here). "…lo, an horror of great darkness fell upon him." The other accounts of it describe what the sacrifice was.

 

Then his wife has this terrible affair with Hagar (all these squabbles at home). In chapter 16 she says to him (the great and marvelous Sarah, his wife), "My wrong be upon thee: I have given my maid into thy bosom; and…I was despised in her eyes: the Lord judge between me and thee." She wouldn't judge, but because Abraham was childless she allowed him to take another wife, Hagar. Then Hagar started making snide remarks because she had a son, and making life miserable for Sarah (not a happy domestic situation). Then Sodom and Gomorrah, those terrible cities. But he pleads for them. He tries to get them saved, as you know. If there are only ten righteous people, will you please save them? And he abases himself before the Lord, "Wilt thou also destroy the righteous with the wicked? Oh let not the Lord be angry." Then came the big nuclear blast, and the next morning he looked out from his camp high above. He had chosen the bad ground above so that Lot could take the good ground below. It's a good 1500 foot level, and you look down on the whole valley. He looked down, and it was just like a furnace. It says flickering fires all full of smoke and dust, as if there had been some tremendous blast going (and there was). It's the most active volcanic and earthquake zone in the world down the rift there. The Gulf of Aqaba leads right up into the Djauf. "…and lo the smoke of the country went up as the smoke of a furnace." So he gets out of that. He moves to the coast to be safe. After that explosion, it wasn't safe to be where he was. Then he took his family and went to the coast. The king of Gerar, Abimelech, was in charge there. They got along all right, but he took Sarah to wife also. Sarah was a raging blond and a terrific beauty, they tell us, but that wasn't the reason. They wanted to raise up a royal line by her (her name means "princess, queen"). Then he is in trouble again. "…They will slay me for my wife's sake." Then he has to get rid of Hagar, his wife who had a son, Ishmael. "And Abraham rose up early in the morning, and took bread and a bottle of water, and gave it unto Hagar…and sent her away…" That was no fun. "And Abraham reproved Abimelech because of a well of water, which Abimelech's servants had violently taken away." Then comes the supreme test, the sacrifice of Isaac (Gen. 22:2). "Take now thy son, thine only son Isaac, whom thou lovest…and offer him there for a burnt offering." And then finally at the end of his life in chapter 23: "I am a stranger and a sojourner with you: give me a possession of a burying place with you, that I may bury my dead out of my sight."

 

 

(Hugh Nibley, Ancient Documents and the Pearl of Great Price, edited by Robert Smith and Robert Smythe [n.p., n.d.], 7.)

 

 

It isn’t a test unless it hurts and doesn’t make sense, Elder Maxwell on Irony.

 

Irony:
The Crust on the Bread of Adversity

Elder Neal A. Maxwell
Of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles

 

Neal A. Maxwell, “Irony: The Crust on the Bread of Adversity,” Ensign, May 1989, 62


What I now read is a most wintry verse indeed: “Nevertheless the Lord seeth fit to chasten his people; yea, he trieth their patience and their faith.” (Mosiah 23:21.)

This very sobering declaration of divine purpose ought to keep us on spiritual alert as to life’s adversities.

Irony is the hard crust on the bread of adversity. Irony can try both our faith and our patience. Irony can be a particularly bitter form of such chastening because it involves disturbing incongruity. It involves outcomes in violation of our expectations. We see the best laid plans laid waste.

An individual is visibly and patiently prepared for an important role amid widespread expectation of his impending promotion or election. What follows, however, lasts only a very narrow moment in time. A political victory seems so near, recedes, and finally vanishes altogether.

Without meekness, such ironical circumstances are very difficult to manage.

In a marriage, a careless declaration hardens into a position, which position then becomes more important than communication or reconciliation. An intellectual stand is proudly and stubbornly defended even in the face of tutoring truth or correcting counsel. Yet occasionally, as we all know, backing off is really going forward. Sometimes it takes irony to induce that painful but progressive posture.

With its inverting of our anticipated consequences, irony becomes the frequent cause of an individual’s being offended. The larger and the more untamed one’s ego, the greater the likelihood of his being offended, especially when tasting his portion of vinegar and gall.

Words then issue, such as Why me? Why this? Why now? Of course, these words may give way to subsequent spiritual composure. Sometimes, however, such words precede bitter inconsolability, and then it is a surprisingly short distance between disappointment and bitterness.

Amid life’s varied ironies, you and I may begin to wonder, did not God notice this torturous turn of events? And if He noticed, why did He permit it? Am I not valued?

Our planning itself often assumes that our destiny is largely in our own hands. Then come intruding events, first elbowing aside, then evicting what was anticipated and even earned. Hence, we can be offended by events as well as by people.

Irony may involve not only unexpected suffering but also undeserved suffering. We feel we deserved better, and yet we fared worse. We had other plans, even commendable plans. Did they not count? A physician, laboriously trained to help the sick, now, because of his own illness, cannot do so. For a period, a diligent prophet of the Lord was an “idle witness.” (Morm. 3:16.) Frustrating conditions keep more than a few of us from making our appointed rounds.

Customized challenges are thus added to that affliction and temptation which Paul described as “common to man.” (1 Cor. 10:13.)

In coping with irony, as in all things, we have an Exemplary Teacher in Jesus. Dramatic irony assaulted Jesus’ divinity almost constantly.

For Jesus, in fact, irony began at His birth. Truly, He suffered the will of the Father “in all things from the beginning.” (3 Ne. 11:11.) This whole earth became Jesus’ footstool (see Acts 7:49), but at Bethlehem there was “no room … in the inn” (Luke 2:7) and “no crib for his bed” (Hymns, 1985, no. 206.)

At the end, meek and lowly Jesus partook of the most bitter cup without becoming the least bitter. (See 3 Ne. 11:11; D&C 19:18–19.) The Most Innocent suffered the most. Yet the King of Kings did not break, even when some of His subjects did unto Him “as they listed.” (D&C 49:6.) Christ’s capacity to endure such irony was truly remarkable.

You and I are so much more brittle. For instance, we forget that, by their very nature, tests are unfair.

In heaven, Christ’s lofty name was determined to be the only name on earth offering salvation to all mankind. (See Acts 4:12; 2 Ne. 25:20; see also Abr. 3:27.) Yet the Mortal Messiah willingly lived so modestly, even, wrote Paul, as a person “of no reputation.” (Philip. 2:7.)

What a contrast to our maneuverings over relative recognition and comparative status. How different, too, from the ways in which some among us mistakenly see the size and response of their audiences as the sole verification of their worth. Yet those fickle galleries we sometimes play to have a way of being constantly emptied. They will surely be empty at the Judgment Day, when everyone will be somewhere else, on their knees.

As the Creator, Christ constructed the universe, yet in little Galilee He was known merely as “the carpenter’s son.” (Matt. 13:55.) In fact, the Lord of the universe was without honor even in His own Nazarene countryside. Though astonished at His teachings, his neighbors “were offended at him.” (Mark 6:3.) Even meek Jesus “marvelled because of their unbelief.” (Mark 6:6.)

As Jehovah, Jesus issued the original commandment to keep the Sabbath day holy, but during His mortal Messiahship, He was accused of violating the Sabbath, because on that day He gave healing rest to the afflicted. (See John 5:8–16.)

Can we absorb the irony of being hurt while trying to help? Having done good, when we are misrepresented, can we watch the feathers of false witness scatter on the winds?

Christ, long, long ago as Creator, provided habitable conditions for us on this earth, generously providing all the essential atmospheric conditions for life, including essential water. (See Moses 1:33; D&C 76:24.) Yet on the cross, when he was aflame with thirst, “they gave him vinegar to drink mingled with gall: and when he had tasted thereof, he would not drink.” (Matt. 27:34; see also Ps. 69:21.) Even so, there was no railing but a forgiving Christ. (See Luke 23:34.)

Christ was keenly aware of the constant irony: “Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of man hath not where to lay his head.” (Luke 9:58.) He asked a treacherous Judas, “Betrayest thou the Son of man with a kiss?” (Luke 22:48.) And then there was the soulful lament, “O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, … how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!” (Matt. 23:37.) Yet the repeated ritual of rejection was happening to Jesus all over again.

We all know what it is like not to be listened to, but how about disdain or even contempt? Furthermore, there is a difference between noticing rejection, as Jesus did, and railing against rejection, as He did not.

As the Creator, Christ fashioned “worlds without number” (Moses 1:33), yet with His fingers He fashioned a little clay from spittle, restoring sight to one blind man. (See John 9:6.) The Greatest meekly ministered “unto one of the least of these.” (Matt. 25:40.)

Do you and I understand that the significance of our service does not depend upon its scale?

Within hours Christ would rescue all mankind, yet he heard the manipulated crowd cry, “Barabbas,” thereby rescuing a life-taking murderer instead of life-giving Jesus. (See Mark 15:7–15.)

Can we remain true amid false justice? Will we do our duty against the roar of the crowd?

As the Master Teacher, Christ tailored His tutoring, depending upon the spiritual readiness of His pupils. We see instructive irony even in some of these episodes.

To the healed leper returning with gratitude, Jesus’ searching but simple query was, “Where are the [other] nine?” (Luke 17:17.) To a more knowledgeable mother of Apostles, desiring that her two sons sit on Jesus’ right and left hands, Jesus reprovingly but lovingly said, “Ye know not what you ask. … [This] is not mine to give.” (Matt. 20:22–23.) To a grieving but rapidly maturing Peter, still burning with the memory of a rooster’s crowing, thrice came the directive, “Feed my sheep,” but also a signifying of “by what death” the great Apostle would later be martyred. (John 18:25–27; John 21:15–19.) How much more demanding of Peter than of the leper!

If a sudden, stabbing light exposes the gap between what we are and what we think we are, can we, like Peter, let that light be a healing laser? Do we have the patience to endure when one of our comparative strengths is called into question? A painful crisis may actually be the means of stripping corrosive pride off of that virtue.

To the humbly devout woman of Samaria who expected the Messiah, Jesus quietly disclosed, “I that speak unto thee am he.” (John 4:26.) Yet an anxious Pilate “saith unto Jesus, Whence art thou? But Jesus gave him no answer.” (John 19:9.)

Can we remain silent when silence is eloquence—but may be used against us? Or will we murmur, just to let God know we notice the ironies?

Yet, even with all the ironies, sad ironies, there is the grand and glad irony of Christ’s great mission. He Himself noted that precisely because He was “lifted up upon” the cross, He was able to “draw all men unto [him],” and being “lifted up by men,” even so should “men be lifted up by the Father.” (3 Ne. 27:14.)

But how can we fortify ourselves against the irony in our lives and cope better when it comes?

By being more like Jesus, such as by loving more. “And the world, because of their iniquity, shall judge him to be a thing of naught; wherefore they scourge him, and he suffereth it; and they smite him, and he suffereth it. Yea, they spit upon him, and he suffereth it, [Why?] because of his loving kindness and his long-suffering towards the children of men.” (1 Ne. 19:9.)

There are other significant keys for coping. “And he said to them all, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross daily, and follow me.” (Luke 9:23.) Wise self-denial shrinks our sense of entitlement.

Another cardinal key is to “live in thanksgiving daily, for the many mercies and blessings which [God] doth bestow upon you.” (Alma 34:38.)

Life’s comparatively few ironies are much more than offset by heaven’s many mercies! We cannot count all our blessings every day, but we can carry over the reassuring bottom line from the last counting.

Another vital way of coping was exemplified by Jesus. Though He suffered all manner of temptations (see Alma 7:11), yet He “gave no heed unto them” (D&C 20:22). Unlike some of us, He did not fantasize, reconsider, or replay temptations. How is it that you and I do not see that while initially we are stronger and the temptations weaker, dalliance turns things upside down?

Jesus’ marvelous meekness prevented any “root of bitterness” from “springing up” in Him. (Heb. 12:15.) Ponder the Savior’s precious words about the Atonement after He passed through it. There is no mention of the vinegar. No mention of the scourging. No mention of having been struck. No mention of having been spat upon. He does declare that He “suffer[ed] both body and spirit” in an exquisiteness which we simply cannot comprehend. (D&C 19:18; see also D&C 19:15.)

We come now to the last and most terrible irony of Jesus: His feeling forsaken at the apogee of His agony on Calvary. The apparent withdrawal of the Father’s spirit then evoked the greatest soul cry in human history. (See James E. Talmage, Jesus the Christ, Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1916, p. 613.) This deprivation had never happened to Christ before—never. Yet, thereby, Jesus became a fully comprehending Christ and was enabled to be a fully succoring Savior. (See Alma 7:11–12.) Moreover, even in that darkest hour, while feeling forsaken, Jesus submitted Himself to the Father.

No wonder the Savior tells us that the combined anguish in Gethsemane and on Calvary was so awful that He would have shrunk. “Nevertheless,” He finished His “preparations.” (See D&C 19:18–19; 3 Ne. 11:11.) The word nevertheless reflects deep, divine determination.

Furthermore, even after treading the winepress alone (see D&C 76:107), which ended in His stunning, personal triumph and in the greatest victory ever—majestic Jesus meekly declared, “Glory be to the Father”! (D&C 19:19.) This should not surprise us. In the premortal world, Jesus meekly volunteered to be our Savior, saying, “Father, thy will be done, and the glory be thine forever.” (Moses 4:2.) Jesus was true to His word.

Now, in closing, I humbly declare, “Glory be to the Father”—first, for rearing such an Incomparable Son. Second, “Glory be to the Father” for allowing His special Son to suffer and to be sacrificed for all of us. On Judgment Day, brothers and sisters, will any of us want to rush forward to tell our Father how we, as parents, suffered when we watched our children suffer?

Glory be to the Father, in the name of Him who can succor us amid all our ironies and adversities (see Alma 7:11–12), even Jesus Christ, amen.

God has the right over life or death or marriage.  So God can tell us what to do in these areas.  God commanded Nephi to kill Laban.  God commanded plural marriage.  God commanded sacrifice and the taking of concubines.

Our cultural norms are not His norms

 

(Isaiah 55:8-9.)

 

8 ¶ For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD.

 

9 For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts.

It is not our choice to take a life (euthanasia, assisted suicide etc) unless God commands it since He has control over life and death.

Mortality is the time to prove us in preparation for the Millennium.  We need to be obedient to things we cannot see and understand to help us become Gods, to be able to create worlds of our own.

The sacrifice of Isaac made no sense, yet Abraham was obedient as was Isaac.  Each test has gotten worse; Isaac is about 20-30 years old.

Genesis 12 and 25 – Place names are quite similar, as well as the country 12:1, and the son, Isaac and Christ.

Abraham and Isaac

 

Abraham, who was promised that he would be the father of nations or multitudes, is venerated as such today by Jews, Christians, and Mohammedans alike. Among Christians no Old Testament figure is more universally recognized as a type for Christ. Known also as the father of the faithful (which title, like that of father of multitudes, is a likeness of Christ), Abraham and Isaac were understood to be "a similitude of God and his Only Begotten Son," even in Old Testament times (Jacob 4:5). The Abraham narrative begins with his obedient response to the command of God in leaving Ur of the Chaldees. To Abraham the Lord said, "Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father's house, unto a land that I will show thee" (Abraham 2:3). So Abraham departed his country, his kindred, and the honors of his father's house, "not knowing whither he went," yet willing that God be his guide (Hebrews 11:8). Ultimately this and the sacrifices yet to follow would be rewarded with a greater country, a faithful posterity, and the fulness of the honors of his divine Father's house. Yet the journey would be long, the trials plentiful, and for the moment of mortality he would be but a stranger and pilgrim on the earth.

 

Abram and Sarai first went to Haran, where they won many souls to the Lord (Abraham 2:15) and proved their willingness to separate themselves from the world. At the direction of the Lord they continued their journey into the land of Canaan, building altars at Jershon, at Shechem, and between Bethel and Ai. Whether we are to see significance in each of these places is not certain. Shechem signifies "shoulder," suggesting the place of strength; it was situated in the plains of Moreh, which means "instruction." Perhaps this is to suggest that as we separate our selves from the world, and depend on the Lord to direct our paths, we come to the place of strength from which we are entitled to receive instruction at his hand. From Shechem they journeyed to a mountain on the east of Bethel (house of God) and west of Ai (heap of ruin), where again they built an altar and from thence journeyed to Egypt, where Sarai was tested and they were rewarded with great wealth before returning to Canaan.

 

When the Lord established his covenant with Abraham in the land of Canaan he promised him a son, to be born of Sarah in her old age. Accordingly, when Abraham was a hundred years of age and his wife but ten years less, the promise of the Lord was fulfilled as their only son, Isaac, was born to them. That the events of his birth were symbolic there can be no doubt. He was the long-awaited son, the son of promise, the son of whom more had been spoken before his birth than any other save only He of whom he was a type. He was known by name before his birth, a name designated in the heavens (Genesis 17:19). He was the child of God's miracle upon his mother, the child born at the "set time of which God had spoken" (Genesis 21:2), the child destined to receive all that his father had (Genesis 24:36).

 

As Isaac grew, his older brother, Ishmael, turned on him to mock, and thus Ishmael and his mother were cast out by Abraham and Sarah. Paul saw this as a type. He likened Ishmael, the child of the flesh or the child of bondage (he being the son of the bondwoman), to the Mosaic law; Isaac, the child of promise and son of the freewoman, he likened to the fulness of the gospel. Those seeking to embrace the higher law were persecuted in like manner by those born of the carnal law. Yet they are heirs to the promise, while their persecutors are destined to wander in the wilderness. (Galatians 4:22-31.)

 

In all scriptural writ there is no more perfect similitude of events yet future nor any more detailed Messianic prophecy than the command of God to Abraham that he offer his son as a sacrifice. "Take now thy son, thine only son Isaac, whom thou lovest, and get thee into the land of Moriah; and offer him there for a burnt offering upon one of the mountains which I will tell thee of" (Genesis 22:2). Father and son immediately commenced the three-day journey from Beersheba to the appointed place&mdash;Moriah. The Genesis account refers to Isaac as "the lad"; Josephus gives his age as twenty-five, while the rabbis held that he was thirty-six or thirty-seven. Reasoning from the perfection of the rest of the type, we would conclude that he was thirty-three years of age, that being the age at which Christ, like Isaac, offered himself as a willing sacrifice. Such being the case, Abraham would have been 133 years of age, again emphasizing that Isaac was fully willing to yield himself to the will of his father.

 

The place of the offering we have already identified. Mount Moriah was the sacred spot where the temple of the Lord was yet to be built and where both typological and actual sacrifice would yet be wrought out. As they ascended the hill, "Abraham took the wood of the burnt offering, and laid it upon Isaac" to carry as the Christ would yet carry his own cross. When Isaac inquired, "Where is the lamb for a burnt offering?" Abraham responded, "God will provide himself a lamb," for in very deed only God could provide a sacrificial lamb that would redeem all mankind. (Genesis 22:6-8.) And thus the Lord did, for the ram in the thicket was a double type, representing the substitute for Isaac as Christ is the substitute for all, and of course representing Christ himself as the great and last offering.

 

Abraham's life personified faith and typified the blessings that flow from obedience. Through Isaiah the Lord said: "Hearken to me, ye that follow after righteousness, ye that seek the Lord: look unto the rock whence ye are hewn, and to the hole of the pit whence ye are digged. Look unto Abraham your father, and unto Sarah that bare you: for I called him alone [when he was but one], and blessed him, and increased him." (Isaiah 51:1-2.) To Joseph Smith the Lord said: "Abraham received all things, whatsoever he received, by revelation and commandment, by my word, saith the Lord, and hath entered into his exaltation and sitteth upon his throne .... Go ye, therefore, and do the works of Abraham." (D&C 132:29, 32.)

 

(Joseph Fielding McConkie, Gospel Symbolism [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1999], 151.)

Burnt offering – cut into pieces, burn until nothing is left.

Abraham does not delay and arises early to take Isaac to be sacrificed, he knows the Lord will keep His promise about Abraham’s seed and will bring Isaac back to life.  He even tells the 2 servants they will be back.

The ram is symbolic of Christ; it is killed in place of Isaac.

A New and Everlasting Covenant

(D&C 132)

 

ROBERT L. MILLET

 

President Brigham Young spoke eloquently concerning the infinite scope of marriage:

 

The whole subject of the marriage relation is not in my reach, nor in any other man's reach on this earth. It is without beginning of days or end of years: it is a hard matter to reach. We can tell some things with regard to it: it lays the foundation for worlds, for angels, and for the Gods; for intelligent beings to be crowned with glory, immortality and eternal lives. In fact, it is the thread which runs from the beginning to the end of the holy Gospel of Salvation—of the Gospel of the Son of God; it is from eternity to eternity. fn

 

The profound truths contained in section 132 of the Doctrine and Covenants (when read in conjunction with other revelations, particularly section 131) constitute the scriptural authority for the unique and exalted concept of marriage and family among the Latter-day Saints. In a day when iniquity abounds and the love of many has begun to wax cold (D&C 45:27), the revelations of God through his prophets provide an anchor to the troubled soul. D&C 132 is a message which is both peaceful and penetrating, a revelation which can bring order and organization to things on earth, as well as point man toward his infinite possibilities among the Gods.

 

Backgrounds

 

The fulness of the gospel is called by the Lord his "new and everlasting covenant." In a revelation given in October, 1830 Joseph Smith was told: "Verily I say unto you, blessed are you for receiving mine everlasting covenant, even the fulness of my gospel, sent forth unto the children of men, that they might have life and be partakers of the glories which are to be revealed in the last days, as it was written by the prophets and apostles in days of old" (D&C 66:2; cf. 39:11; 45:9; 133:57). Elder Bruce R. McConkie has written:

 

The gospel is the everlasting covenant because it is ordained by Him who is Everlasting and also because it is everlastingly the same. In all past ages salvation was gained by adherence to its terms and conditions, and that same compliance will bring the same reward in all future ages. Each time this everlasting covenant is revealed it is new to those of that dispensation. Hence the gospel is the new and everlasting covenant. fn

 

Eternal Marriage, the ordinance by which couples enter into the Patriarchal Order (D&C 131:1-2), is a new and everlasting covenant within the fulness of the gospel. In our day it is a crucial element in the restitution of all things (D&C 132:40, 45). Eternal Marriage is the ordinance and covenant which leads to the consummate blessings of the gospel of Jesus Christ; it is that order of the priesthood which, when put into effect, will bind ancestry to posterity and thus prevent the earth from being utterly wasted at the time of the Savior's Second Coming (D&C 2).

 

As the introductory material to section 132 states, the basic doctrines of this revelation were received as early as 1831, yet the full application and historical context reflect its 1843 recording. A statement from Joseph Noble, a close associate of Joseph Smith the Prophet, is instructive. Noble observed that the revelation on eternal marriage was given to Joseph "while he was engaged in the work of translation of the Scriptures." fn The opening verse of the revelation suggests that Joseph had inquired concerning Old Testament personalities and their participation in plural marriage. The Prophet would have been involved in the study of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob—the book of Genesis—in 1830 and 1831. fn Elder B. H. Roberts has given the following extended explanation:

 

There is indisputable evidence that the revelation making known this marriage law was given to the Prophet as early as 1831. In that year, and then intermittently up to 1833, the Prophet was engaged in a revision of the English Bible text under the inspiration of God, Sidney Rigdon in the main acting as his scribe. As he began his revision with the Old Testament, he would be dealing with the age of the Patriarchs in 1831. He was doubtless struck with the favor in which the Lord held the several Bible Patriarchs of that period, notwithstanding they had a plurality of wives. What more natural than that he should inquire of the Lord at that time, when his mind must have been impressed with the fact—Why, O Lord, didst Thou justify Thy servants, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob; as also Moses, David and Solomon, in the matter of their having many wives and concubines (see opening paragraph of the Revelation)? In answer to that inquiry came the revelation, though not then committed to writing. fn

 

The Prophet Joseph Smith shared many of the details of the revelation with intimate associates, particularly when he felt one could be trusted to value and preserve a sacred matter. Between 1831 and 1843 a number of the leaders of the Church were instructed concerning the eternal marriage covenant (including the plurality of wives) and were told that eventually many of the faithful would be called upon to comply with the will of the Lord. In speaking to a gathering of the Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints in Plano, Illinois in 1878, Orson Pratt

 

explained the circumstances connected with the coming forth of the revelation on plural marriage. Refuted the statement and belief of those present that Brigham Young was the author of the revelation; showed that Joseph Smith the Prophet had not only commenced the practice of that principle himself, and taught it to others, before President Young and the Twelve had returned from their mission in Europe, in 1841, but that Joseph actually received revelations upon that principle as early as 1831. fn

 

As one might expect, the doctrine of plural marriage was not easily received, even by those who were otherwise counted as faithful. President John Taylor, known to be one of the purest men who ever lived, explained that "when this system [polygamy] was first introduced among this people, it was one of the greatest crosses that was ever taken up by any set of men since the world stood." fn Helen Mar Whitney, one of Joseph Smith's plural wives, recalled that Joseph "said that the practice of this principle would be the hardest trial the Saints would ever have to test their faith." fn One of those for whom the principle was particularly difficult was Emma Smith, wife of the Prophet. It appears, therefore, that one of the major reasons for the formal recording of the revelation in 1843 was to assist Emma to recognize the divine source of this doctrine. William Clayton, private secretary to Joseph Smith, recorded the following:

 

On the morning of the 12th of July, 1843, Joseph and Hyrum Smith came into the office of the upper story of the "Brick-store," on the bank of the Mississippi River. They were talking of the subject of plural marriage, [and] Hyrum said to Joseph, "If you will write the revelation of celestial marriage, I will take and read it to Emma, and I believe I can convince her of its truth, and you will hereafter have peace." Joseph smiled and remarked, "You do not know Emma as well as I do." Hyrum repeated his opinion, and further remarked, "The doctrine is so plain, I can convince any reasonable man or woman of its truth, purity, and heavenly origin," or words to that effect. . . . Joseph and Hyrum then sat down, and Joseph commenced to dictate the Revelation on Celestial Marriage, and I wrote it, sentence by sentence, as he dictated. After the whole was written, Joseph asked me to read it through slowly and carefully, which I did, and he pronounced it correct. fn

 

The following entry from William Clayton's diary for 12 July 1843 is interesting: "This A.M. I wrote a Revelation consisting of 10 pages on the order of the priesthood, showing the designs in Moses, Abraham, David and Solomon having many wives & concubines &c. After it was wrote Prests. Joseph & Hyrum presented it and read it to E[mma]. who said she did not believe a word of it and appeared very rebellious." fn

 

D&C 132 is a revelation dealing with celestial marriage. It also contains information and explanations concerning the practice of plural marriage. One Latter-day Saint historian, Danel Bachman, has suggested that section 132 consists largely of the Lord's answers to three critical questions posed by the Prophet Joseph Smith. fn We will consider the questions and answers more carefully as we come to them in the text of the revelation.

 

The Lord's Justification (vv. 1-6)

 

The first question asked by the Prophet Joseph was simply why the polygamous actions of notable Old Testament prophet-leaders had received divine approval. Why was it, the Prophet wanted to know, that prophets, patriarchs, and kings could have many wives and concubines? fn In the Lord's response, Joseph was told to prepare his heart for the instructions about to be given (v. 3); in this instance the explanation for the ancient phenomenon was to be accompanied by a commandment to institute the practice in modern times. Seeking further light and knowledge had led the Prophet to further and greater obligations; much was about to be given, and much would soon be required (cf. D&C 82:3). Salvation in the highest heaven was at stake. Those who received this new and everlasting covenant (and thereafter chose to abide by its terms and conditions) qualified themselves—through the eternal principle of obedience (cf. D&C 130:20-21)—for the fulness of the glory of the Father, "which glory shall be a fulness and a continuation of the seeds forever and ever" (v. 19). These are they who shall be enlarged, that is, have an increase—spirit children into the eternities. They enjoy eternal lives (D&C 131:1-4; 132:17, 24). Joseph had taught these principles only two months earlier: "Except a man and his wife enter into an everlasting covenant and be married for eternity, while in this probation, by the power and authority of the Holy Priesthood, they will cease to increase when they die; that is, they will not have any children after the resurrection. But those who are married by the power and authority of the priesthood in this life, and continue without committing the sin against the Holy Ghost, will continue to increase and have children in the celestial glory." fn

 

Salvation consists in the blessing of eternal lives, the continuation of the family unit in eternity. Damnation is the result of rejecting this new and everlasting covenant and is due largely to pursuing the broad and wide ways of the world; the punishment is "the deaths," the dissolution of the family unit beyond the grave (D&C 132:17, 24-25).

 

Marriage in the Lord: Sealed by the Holy Spirit of Promise (vv. 7-27, 49-50)

 

The second question posed by the Prophet Joseph Smith seems to be associated with the cryptic statement by Jesus in response to a Sadduceean trap: "Ye do err, not knowing the scriptures, nor the power of God. For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven" (Matt. 22:29-30; cf. Luke 20:34-36). This expression, little understood in the days of the Prophet, is repeatedly given today as scriptural evidence against the Latter-day Saint doctrine of eternal marriage. Joseph Smith's question concerning its meaning led to a modern revealed commentary upon the passage and pointed us to the reality that Jesus Christ had taught the doctrine of eternal marriage during his mortal ministry. fn

 

From section 132 we learn that THEY who neither marry nor are given in marriage in eternity are they who choose not to enter in by the strait gate and partake of the new and everlasting covenant of marriage. Even persons who qualify in every other way for the glories of the celestial kingdom, but who for selfish reasons reject opportunities for celestial marriage, cannot attain unto the highest degree of the celestial glory (cf. D&C 131:1-4). Such persons are "appointed angels in heaven, which angels are ministering servants, to minister for those who are worthy of a far more, and an exceeding, and an eternal weight of glory." The Lord continued: Because they did not abide by his law, "they cannot be enlarged, but remain separately and singly, without exaltation, in their saved condition, to all eternity; and from henceforth are not gods, but are angels of God forever and ever" (D&C 132:16-17). In commenting upon the status of angels, Joseph Smith said: "Gods have an ascendency over the angels, who are ministering servants. In the resurrection, some are raised to be angels, others are raised to become Gods." fn

 

The Holy Spirit of Promise is the Holy Ghost, the Holy Spirit promised to the faithful. The Holy Ghost is a member of the Godhead with vital and important roles in the salvation of the people of the earth. He is a revelator and a testator, the means by which a witness of the truth is obtained. He is a sanctifier, the means by which filth and dross are burned out of the human soul as though by fire. One of the highest functions the Holy Ghost serves is to be a sealer, as the Holy Spirit of Promise. In this capacity he searches the heart, certifies a person is just, and thereafter seals an exaltation upon that person. That is to say, to be sealed by the Holy Spirit of Promise is to be sealed unto eternal life. In commenting on v. 7 in section 132 (regarding all covenants, contracts, bonds, etc. having the seal of the Holy Spirit of Promise), Elder Bruce R. McConkie has written:

 

By way of illustration, this means that baptism, partaking of the sacrament, administering to the sick, marriage, and every covenant that man ever makes with the Lord . . . must be performed in righteousness by and for people who are worthy to receive whatever blessing is involved, otherwise whatever is done has no binding and sealing effect in eternity.

 

Since "the Comforter knoweth all things" (D&C 42:17), it follows that it is not possible "to lie to the Holy Ghost" and thereby gain an unearned or undeserved blessing, as Ananias and Sapphira found out to their sorrow (Acts 5:1-11). And so this provision that all things must be sealed by the Holy Spirit of Promise, if they are to have "efficacy, virtue, or force in and after the resurrection from the dead" (D&C 132:7), the Lord's system for dealing with absolute impartiality with all men, and for giving all men exactly what they merit, neither adding to nor diminishing from.

 

When the Holy Spirit of Promise places his ratifying seal upon a baptism, or a marriage, or any covenant, except that of having one's calling and election made sure, the seal is a conditional approval or ratification; it is binding in eternity only in the event of subsequent obedience to the terms and conditions of whatever covenant is involved.

 

But when the ratifying seal of approval is placed upon someone whose calling and election is thereby made sure—because there are no more conditions to be met by the obedient person—this act of being sealed up unto eternal life is of such transcendent import that of itself it is called being sealed by the Holy Spirit of Promise, which means that in this crowning sense, being so sealed is the same as having one's calling and election made sure. fn

 

Without question, one of the most misunderstood (and misquoted) verses of scripture is D&C 132:26. Some members of the Church have wrested the scriptures to the point where they have concluded that a temple marriage alone (which they equate with being sealed by the Holy Spirit of Promise) will assure them of an exaltation, in spite of "any sin of the new and everlasting covenant whatever, and all manner of blasphemies." When it is fully understood, however, that the marriage ceremony performed in the House of the Lord—though performed by worthy priesthood bearers granted sacred sealing powers—is a conditional ordinance, a rite whose eventual blessings are contingent upon the faithfulness (in years to come) of the participants, then v. 26 is recognized as being consistent with other related principles—obedience, endurance to the end, and appropriate reward. Verse 26 has reference to those who have received the new and everlasting covenant of marriage, have complied with all its conditions, and have passed the tests of mortality. These are they who, paraphrasing Joseph Smith, have lived by every word of God, and are willing to serve the Lord at all hazards. They have made their callings and elections sure to eternal life. fn Persons who attain to this level of righteousness "are sealed up against all manner of sin and blasphemy except the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost and the shedding of innocent blood." fn

 

The Prophet Joseph Smith extended the challenging invitation to the Saints: "I would exhort you to go on and continue to call upon God until you make your calling and election sure for yourselves, by obtaining this more sure word of prophecy, and wait patiently for the promise until you obtain it." fn Latter-day Saints who are married in the temple may thus press forward in the work of the Lord and with quiet dignity and patient maturity seek to be worthy of the certain assurance of eternal life before the end of their mortal lives. But should one not formally receive the more sure word of prophecy in this life, he has the scriptural promise that faithfully enduring to the end—keeping the covenants and commandments from baptism to the end of his life (Mosiah 18:8-9) eventuates in the promise of eternal life, whether that promise be received here or hereafter (D&C 14:7; cf. 2 Ne. 31:20; Mosiah 5:15).

 

All men are subject to temptation and mortal weaknesses and therefore commit some sin, even those whose callings and elections have been made sure (see D&C 20:32-34; 124:124). Though the disposition to commit grievous sin would certainly be less among such individuals, yet the principles of repentance and forgiveness are as highly treasured by these as by any of our Father's children. At the same time, where much is given, much is expected and required. Joseph Smith taught: "If men sin wilfully after they have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sin." fn In the words of a modern apostle: "Suppose such persons become disaffected and the spirit of repentance leaves them—which is a seldom and almost unheard of eventuality—still, what then? The answer is—and the revelations and teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith so recite!—they must then pay the penalty of their own sins, for the blood of Christ will not cleanse them." fn

 

When one is guilty of serious transgression and loses the right to the Spirit and the protective blessings of the priesthood, he is essentially "delivered unto the buffetings of Satan" (D&C 132:26), such that "Lucifer is free to torment, persecute, and afflict such a person without let or hindrance. When the bars are down, the cuffs and curses of Satan, both in this world and in the world to come, bring indescribable anguish typified by burning fire and brimstone" fn (cf. D&C 78:12; 82:20-21; 104:9-10; 1 Cor. 5:1-5).

 

Once one has been sealed by the Holy Spirit of Promise, he is in a position to either rise to exaltation or (through rebellion and apostasy) fall to perdition. Verse 27 has specific reference to those who have received the new and everlasting covenant of marriage and proven faithful enough to have the final stamp of approval from the Holy Ghost. One who has been sealed up unto eternal life and thereafter proves to be a total enemy to the cause of righteousness is guilty of "shedding innocent blood," the innocent blood of Christ, and assenting unto his death. fn Such a vicious disposition would lead the transgressor to reject and crucify the Son of God afresh (cf. Heb. 6:4-6).

 

Among the most beautiful and touching verses in section 132 are vv. 49 and 50, wherein the Lord seals an exaltation upon the head of Joseph the Seer. What a comfort to a troubled and weary mind to hear such words as these: "Verily I seal upon you your exaltation, and prepare a throne for you in the kingdom of my Father, with Abraham your father." The reader of this revelation is also given a meaningful insight into how to qualify for such a transcendent promise: "Behold I have seen your sacrifices, and will forgive all your sins; I have seen your sacrifices in obedience to that which I have told you. Go, therefore, and I make a way for your escape, as I accepted the offering of Abraham of his son Isaac." The key element in obtaining the promise of exaltation is sacrifice. It was to the School of the Prophets in the Winter of 1834-35 that Joseph had given profound counsel: only through the sacrifice of all things could one come to the point of faith or confidence wherein he could have an actual knowledge that the course in life he was pursuing was according to the divine will. "Those, then, who make the sacrifice," the Prophet had taught, "will have the testimony that their course is pleasing in the sight of God; and those who have this testimony will have faith to lay hold on eternal life." fn That principle of truth was now realized and confirmed directly upon the head of the one who had declared it less than ten years earlier; no matter what the eventuality, nothing could separate the man of God from the love of his God. fn

 

Marriage Among the Ancients (vv. 28-40)

 

As a type of follow-up on his first question, Joseph Smith was given additional insights into requirements made of individuals in ancient times. The Patriarch Abraham was instructed to take Hagar, the servant of Sarah, as a second wife, in order to bring to pass the promises made earlier to the Father of the Faithful—that his posterity would be as numerous as the stars in the heavens or the sands upon the seashore (Gen. 22:17; Abr. 3:14). This modern revelation helps to clarify the Old Testament story considerably (see Gen. 16), and shows that the decision to take an additional wife was a God-inspired directive, and not simply a desperate move by Sarah to insure posterity for her grieving husband. Joseph Smith was told that because of Abraham's perfect obedience he was granted the privilege of eternal increase. The Lord then said to Joseph: "This promise is yours also, because ye are of Abraham, and the promise was made unto Abraham." Then came the command to Joseph Smith, who had in 1836 received the keys necessary to become a modern Faither of the Faithful (D&C 110:12): "Go ye, therefore, and do the works of Abraham; enter ye into my law and ye shall be saved" (D&C 124:31-32; cf. 124:58).

 

The Lord further explained that Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob had attained godhood because of their implicit obedience. More specifically, because they only took additional wives as those wives were given by God, they have entered into their exaltation. David and Solomon were also given directions (through the legal administrators of their day) to take additional wives, and enjoyed the approbation of the heavens as they stayed within the bounds the Lord had set. When they moved outside the divinely given channel, however, and began to acquire wives and concubines for selfish or lustful reasons (e.g., David in the case of Bathsheba, 2 Sam. 11; Solomon in the case of taking "strange women" as wives, women who "turned away his heart" from the things of righteousness, 1 Kgs. 11), they offended God and forfeited the eternal rewards that might have been theirs. Jacob in the Book of Mormon, speaking in behalf of the Lord, warned his people: "Behold, David and Solomon truly had many wives and concubines, which thing was abominable before me, saith the Lord" Jacob 2:24). When both scriptural passages are read together Jacob 2 and D&C 132), it becomes clear that the Lord was condemning—in no uncertain terms—unauthorized plural marriages, and not the principle of plurality of wives per se. Later in that same chapter of Jacob the word of the Lord came: "For if I will, saith the Lord of Hosts, raise up seed unto me [through plural marriage] I will command my people; otherwise they shall hearken unto these things" (Jacob 2:30). Note the words of Joseph Smith as late as October of 1843: "[I] Gave instructions to try those persons who were preaching, teaching, or practicing the doctrine of plurality of wives; for, according to the law, I hold the keys of this power in the last days; for there is never but one on earth at a time on whom the power and its keys are conferred; and I have constantly said no man shall have but one wife at a time, unless the Lord directs otherwise." fn

 

Concerning Adultery (vv. 41-48, 58-62)

 

Verse 41 of section 132 suggests the third question that Joseph Smith must have asked of the Lord. In essence, the question of the Prophet was: "Why were not such polygamous relationships violations of the law of chastity? Why was this not considered adultery?" The Lord's answer was simple and forthright, although considerable space was devoted to the issue in the revelation: any action inspired, authorized, or commanded of God is moral and good. More specifically, marriages approved of the Almighty are recognized and acknowledged as sacred institutions, despite the values or opinions of earth or hell. Joseph wrote in 1839: "How much more dignified and noble are the thoughts of God, than the vain imaginations of the human heart!" fn Verse 36 of this section sheds light on this principle, the idea that whatever God requires is right: "Abraham was commanded to offer his son Isaac; nevertheless, it was written: Thou shalt not kill. Abraham, however, did not refuse, and it was accounted unto him for righteousness." In a letter written to Nancy Rigdon in 1842, Joseph sought to explain (albeit in veiled language) the appropriateness of plural marriage when divinely sanctioned:

 

Happiness is the object and design of our existence, and will be the end thereof if we pursue the path that leads to it; and this path is virtue, uprightness, holiness, and keeping all the commandments of God. But we cannot keep all the commandments without first knowing them, and we cannot expect to know all, or more than we now know, unless we comply with or keep those we have already received. That which is wrong under one circumstance, may be and often is, right under another. God said thou shalt not kill,—at another time he said thou shalt utterly destroy. This is the principle on which the government of heaven is conducted—by revelation adapted to the circumstances in which the children of the kingdom are placed. Whatever God requires is right, no matter what it is, although we may not see the reason thereof till long after the events transpire. If we seek first the kingdom of God, all good things will be added. So with Solomon—first he asked wisdom, and God gave it him, and with it every desire of his heart, even things which may be considered abominable to all who do not understand the order of heaven only in part, but which, in reality, were right, because God gave and sanctioned by special revelation. . . . Every thing that God gives us is lawful and right, and 'tis proper that we should enjoy his gifts and blessings whenever and wherever he is disposed to bestow; but if we should seize upon these same blessings and enjoyments without law, without revelation, without commandment, those blessings and enjoyments would prove cursings and vexations in the end, and we should have to go down in sorrow and wailings of everlasting regret. . . . Blessings offered, but rejected are no longer blessings, but become like the talent hid in the earth by the wicked and slothful servant—the proffered good returns to the giver, the blessing is bestowed upon those who will eceive. fn

 

In section 132 Emma Smith was encouraged to submit to the will of the Lord pertaining to her husband—to yield her heart to the mind of God with regard to the matter of plural marriages. Obedience would lead to glorious blessings; disobedience would lead to damnation, for the covenant people are to abide by this "law of the priesthood" whenever it is specifically given to them by new revelation through the living prophet.

 

Summary

 

We may rest assured that whatever God reveals is given for the benefit and fulfillment of his children—for their happiness. Celestial or eternal marriage has been given to man, according to the word of the Master, in order that man might "multiply and replenish the earth, according to my commandment, and . . . fulfill the promise which was given by my Father before the foundation of the world, and for their exaltation in the eternal worlds, that they may bear the souls of men; for herein is the work of my Father continued, that he may be glorified" (D&C 132:63; cf. v. 31). One of the most popular and important scriptural passages in the Church is found in the Pearl of Great Price. The Lord explained to Moses the purpose of creation and existence: "For behold, this is my work and my glory—to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of man" (Moses 1:39). That the Prophet understood early in his ministry that God's progression and development was accomplished through the exaltation of his children, is evident from an early recording of Moses 1:39. Note a variant rendering of this statement in the Prophet's first draft of the Bible translation: "Behold, this is my work TO my glory, to the immortality and eternal life of man." fn In short, God's work—creating worlds without number, peopling them with his spirit sons and daughters, and providing the truths of the gospel for their edification and salvation (Moses 1:27-38)—not only benefits his children, but further glorifies himself. In speaking by the inspiration of the Lord, Joseph the Prophet explained the following in the famous King Follett Sermon on 7 April 1844:

 

What did Jesus do? Why; I do the things I saw my Father do when worlds came rolling into existence. My Father worked out his kingdom with fear and trembling, and I must do the same; and when I get my kingdom, I shall present it to my Father, so that he may obtain kingdom upon kingdom, and it will exalt him in glory. He will then take a higher exaltation, and I will take his place, and thereby become exalted myself. So that Jesus treads in the tracks of his Father, and inherits what God did before; and God is thus glorified and exalted in the salvation and exaltation of all his children. fn

 

Notes A New and Everlasting Covenants

 

1. JD 2:90.

 

2. Mormon Doctrine, 2nd ed. (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1966), pp. 529-30.

 

3. The minutes of the Davis Stake Conference, published under "Plural Marriage," in Millennial Star 16:454; cited by Danel Bachman in "New Light on an Old Hypothesis: The Ohio Origins of the Revelation on Eternal Marriage," Journal of Mormon History 5 (1978): 22.

 

4. Robert J. Matthews, A Plainer Translation: Joseph Smith's Translation of the Bible, A History and Commentary (Provo: Brigham Young University Press, 1975), pp. 96, 257.

 

5. HC 5:xxix-xxx.

 

6. Millennial Star, 9 December 1878, p. 788; cited in Matthews, A Plainer Translation, p. 258.

 

7. JD 11:221.

 

8. "Scenes and Incidents in Nauvoo," Woman's Exponent 10 (1 November 1881): 83.

 

9. The Historical Record, pp. 225-26; cited in Hyrum M. Smith and Janne M. Sjodahl, Doctrine and Covenants Commentary (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Company, reprint 1965), pp 820-21.

 

10. Cited in Lyndon W. Cook, The Revelations of the Prophet Joseph Smith (Provo, Ut.: Seventy's Mission Bookstore, 1981), p. 294.

 

11. See "New Light on an Old Hypothesis," pp. 19-32.

 

12. A concubine was a wife who came from a position of lower social standing, and who thus did not enjoy the same status as one of higher birth. Under ancient practice, where caste systems were much more common than at present, a man could take a slave or non-citizen as a legal wife, but it was understood that she was of a lower status. This was the case with Sarah (the first wife) and Hagar (the servant who became a concubine).

 

13. TPJS, pp. 300-1.

 

14. See Bruce R. McConkie, Doctrinal New Testament Commentary, 3 vols. (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1966-73), 1:604-6; The Mortal Messiah, 4 books (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1979-81), 3:374-81.

 

15. TPJS, p. 312.

 

16. Doctrinal New Testament Commentary, 3:335-36.

 

17. TPJS, pp. 149-50.

 

18. McConkie, Mormon Doctrine, p. 110.

 

19. TPJS, p. 299.

 

20. Ibid., p. 128.

 

21. Doctrinal New Testament Commentary, 3:343.

 

22. Mormon Doctrine, p. 108.

 

23. McConkie, Doctrinal New Testament Commentary, 3:161, 345; The Mortal Messiah, 2:216.

 

24. Lectures on Faith, Lec. #6, Par. 10.

 

25. For detail concerning Joseph Smith receiving the fulness of the priesthood, see Ronald K. Esplin, "Joseph, Brigham, and the Twelve: A Succession of Continuity," Brigham Young University Studies 21.3 (Summer 1981): 30141; Andrew F. Ehat, "Joseph Smith's Introduction of Temple Ordinances and the 1844 Mormon Succession Question," Unpublished Master's Thesis, Brigham Young University, 1982.

 

26. TPJS, p, 324.

 

27. Ibid., p. 137

 

28. From Dean C. Jessee, The Personal Writings of Joseph Smith (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1984), pp. 507-9; see also HC 5:134-36; TPJS, pp. 255-57.

 

29. See Old Testament Manuscript #2 in Matthews, A Plainer Translation, p. 222, emphasis added.

 

30. TPJS, pp. 347-48.

 

 

(Robert L. Millet and Kent P. Jackson, eds., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 1: The Doctrine and Covenants [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1989], 512.)

 

Book of Joshua

July 20, 2006

“If we are righteous, God will fight our battles for us or He will not let our enemies come against us”

The False Gods We Worship

President Spencer W. Kimball
Ensign, June 1976, pp. 3-6

I have heard that the sense most closely associated with memory is the sense of smell. If this is true, then perhaps it explains the many pleasing feelings that overtake me these mornings when I am able to step outdoors for a few moments and breathe in the warm and comfortable aromas that I have come to associate over the years with the soil and vegetation of this good earth.

Now and then, when the moment is right, some particular scent--perhaps only the green grass, or the smell of sage brought from a distance by a breeze--will take me back to the days of my youth in Arizona. It was an and country, yet it was fruitful under the hands of determined laborers.

We worked with the land and the cattle in all kinds of weather, and when we traveled it was on horseback or in open wagons or carriages, mostly. I used to run like the wind with my brothers and sisters through the orchards, down the dusty lanes, past rows of corn, red tomatoes, onions, squash. Because of this, I suppose it is natural to think that in those days we were closer to elemental life.

Some time ago I chanced to walk outdoors when the dark and massive clouds of an early afternoon thunderstorm were gathering; and as the large raindrops began to drum the dusty soil with increasing rapidity, I recalled the occasional summer afternoons when I was a boy when the tremendous thunderheads would gather over the hills and bring welcome rain to the thirsty soil of the valley floor. We children would run for the shed, and while the lightning danced about we would sit and watch, transfixed, marveling at the ever-increasing power of the pounding rainfall. Afterward, the air would be clean and cool and filled with the sweet smells of the soil, the trees, and the plants of the garden.

There were evenings those many years ago, at about sunset, when I would walk in with the cows. Stopping by a tired old fence post, I would sometimes just stand silently in the mellow light and the fragrance of sunflowers and ask myself, "If you were going to create a world, what would it be like?" Now with a little thought the answer seems so natural: "Just like this one."

So on this day while I stood watching the thunderstorm, I felt--and I feel now--that this is a marvelous earth on which we find ourselves: and when I thought of our preparations for the United States Bicentennial celebration I felt a deep gratitude to the Lord for the choice land and the people and institutions of America. There is much that is good in this land, and much to love.

Nevertheless, on this occasion of so many pleasant memories another impression assailed my thoughts. The dark and threatening clouds that hung so low over the valley seemed to force my mind back to a theme that the Brethren have concerned themselves with for many years now--indeed a theme that has often occupied the attention of the Lord's chosen prophets since the world began. I am speaking of the general state of wickedness in which we seem to find the world in these perilous yet crucially momentous days; and thinking of this, I am reminded of the general principle that where much is given, much is expected. (See Luke 12:48.)

The Lord gave us a choice world and expects [page 4] righteousness and obedience to his commandments in return. But when I review the performance of this people in comparison with what is expected, I am appalled and frightened. Iniquity seems to abound. The Destroyer seems to be taking full advantage of the time remaining to him in this, the great day of his power. Evil seems about to engulf us like a great wave, and we feel that truly we are living in conditions similar to those in the days of Noah before the Flood.

I have traveled much in various assignments over the years, and when I pass through the lovely countryside or fly over the vast and beautiful expanses of our globe, I compare these beauties with many of the dark and miserable practices of men, and I have the feeling that the good earth can hardly bear our presence upon it. I recall the occasion when Enoch heard the earth mourn, saying, "Wo, wo is me, the mother of men; I am pained, I am weary, because of the wickedness of my children. When shall I rest, and be cleansed from the filthiness which is gone forth out of me?" (Moses 7:48.)

The Brethren constantly cry out against that which is intolerable in the sight of the Lord: against pollution of mind, body, and our surroundings; against vulgarity, stealing, lying, pride, and blasphemy; against fornication, adultery, homosexuality, and all other abuses of the sacred power to create; against murder and all that is like unto it; against all manner of desecration.

That such a cry should be necessary among a people so blessed is amazing to me. And that such things should be found even among the Saints to some degree is scarcely believable, for these are a people who are in possession of many gifts of the Spirit, who have knowledge that puts the eternities into perspective, who have been shown the way to eternal life.

Sadly, however, we find that to be shown the way is not necessarily to walk in it, and many have not been able to continue in faith. These have submitted themselves in one degree or another to the enticings of Satan and his servants and joined with those of "the world" in lives of ever-deepening idolatry.

I use the word idolatry intentionally. As I study ancient scripture, I am more and more convinced that there is significance in the fact that the commandment "Thou shalt have no other gods before me" is the first of the Ten Commandments.

Few men have ever knowingly and deliberately chosen to reject God and his blessings. Rather, we learn from the scriptures that because the exercise of faith has always appeared to be more difficult than relying on things more immediately at hand, carnal man has tended to transfer his trust in God to material things. Therefore, in all ages when men have fallen under the power of Satan and lost the faith, they have put in its place a hope in the "arm of flesh" and in "gods of silver, and gold, of brass, iron, wood, and stone, which see not, nor hear, nor know" (Dan. 5:23)--that is, in idols. This I find to be a dominant theme in the Old Testament. Whatever thing a man sets his heart and his trust in most is his god; and if his god doesn't also happen to be the true and living God of Israel, that man is laboring in idolatry.

It is my firm belief that when we read these scriptures and try to "liken them unto [our]selves," as Nephi suggested (1 Ne. 19:24), we will see many parallels between the ancient worship of graven images and behavioral patterns in our very own experience.

The Lord has blessed us as a people with a prosperity unequaled in times past. The resources that have been placed in our power are good, and necessary to our work here on the earth. But I am afraid that many of us have been surfeited with flocks and herds and acres and barns and wealth and have begun to worship them as false gods, and they have power over us. Do we have more of these good things than our faith can stand? Many people spend most of their time working in the service of a self-image that includes sufficient money, stocks, bonds, investment portfolios, property, credit cards, furnishings, automobiles, and the like to guarantee carnal security throughout, it is hoped, a long and happy life. Forgotten is the fact that our assignment is to use these many resources in our families and quorums to build up the kingdom of God--to further the missionary effort and the genealogical and temple work; to raise our children up as fruitful servants unto the Lord; to bless others in every way, that they may also be fruitful. Instead, we expend these blessings on our own desires, and as Moroni said, "Ye adorn yourselves with that which hath no life, and yet suffer the hungry, and the needy, and [page 5] the naked, and the sick and the afflicted to pass by you, and notice them not." (Morm. 8:39.)

As the Lord himself said in our day, "They seek not the Lord to establish his righteousness, but every man walketh in his own way, and after the image of his own God, whose image is in the likeness of the world, and whose substance is that of an idol, which waxeth old and shall perish in Babylon, even Babylon the great, which shall fall." (D&C 1:16; italics added.)

One man I know of was called to a position of service in the Church, but he felt that he couldn't accept because his investments required more attention and more of his time than he could spare for the Lord's work. He left the service of the Lord in search of Mammon, and he is a millionaire today.

But I recently learned an interesting fact: If a man owns a million dollars worth of gold at today's prices, he possesses approximately one 27-billionth of all the gold that is present in the earth's thin crust alone. This is an amount so small in proportion as to be inconceivable to the mind of man. But there is more to this: The Lord who created and has power over all the earth created many other earths as well, even "worlds without number" (Moses 1:33); and when this man received the oath and covenant of the priesthood (D&C 84:33-44), he received a promise from the Lord of "all that my Father hath" (D&C 84:38). To set aside all these great promises in favor of a chest of gold and a sense of carnal security is a mistake in perspective of colossal proportions. To think that he has settled for so little is a saddening and pitiful prospect indeed; the souls of men are far more precious than this.

One young man, when called on a mission, replied that he didn't have much talent for that kind of thing. What he was good at was keeping his powerful new automobile in top condition. He enjoyed the sense of power and acceleration, and when he was driving, the continual motion gave him the illusion that he was really getting somewhere.

All along, his father had been content with saying, "He likes to do things with his hands. That's good enough for him."

Good enough for a son of God? This young man didn't realize that the power of his automobile is infinitesimally small in comparison with the power of the sea, or of the sun; and there are many suns, all controlled by law and by priesthood, ultimately--a priesthood power that he could have been developing in the service of the Lord. He settled for a pitiful god, a composite of steel and rubber and shiny chrome.

An older couple retired from the world of work and also, in effect, from the Church. They purchased a pickup truck and camper and, separating themselves from all obligations, set out to see the world and simply enjoy what little they had accumulated the rest of their days. They had no time for the temple, were too busy for genealogical research and for missionary service. He lost contact with his high priests quorum and was not home enough to work on his personal history. Their experience and leadership were sorely needed in their branch, but, unable to "endure to the end," they were not available.

I am reminded of an article I read some years ago about a group of men who had gone to the jungles to capture monkeys. They tried a number of different things to catch the monkeys, including nets. But finding that the nets could injure such small creatures, they finally came upon an ingenious solution. They built a large number of small boxes, and in the top of each they bored a hole just large enough for a monkey to get his hand into. They then set these boxes out under the trees and in each one they put a nut that the monkeys were particularly fond of.

When the men left, the monkeys began to come down from the trees and examine the boxes. Finding that there were nuts to be had, they reached into the boxes to get them. But when a monkey would try to withdraw his hand with the nut, he could not get his hand out of the box because his little fist, with the nut inside, was now too large.

At about this time, the men would come out of the underbrush and converge on the monkeys. And here is the curious thing: When the monkeys saw the men coming, they would shriek and scramble about with the thought of escaping; but as easy as it would have been, they would not let go of the nut so that they could withdraw their hands from the boxes and thus escape. The men captured them easily.

And so it often seems to be with people, having such a firm grasp on things of the world--that which is telestial--that no amount of urging and no [page 6] degree of emergency can persuade them to let go in favor of that which is celestial. Satan gets them in his grip easily. If we insist on spending all our time and resources building up for ourselves a worldly kingdom, that is exactly what we will inherit.

In spite of our delight in defining ourselves as modern, and our tendency to think we possess a sophistication that no people in the past ever had--in spite of these things, we are, on the whole, an idolatrous people--a condition most repugnant to the Lord.

We are a warlike people, easily distracted from our assignment of preparing for the coming of the Lord. When enemies rise up, we commit vast resources to the fabrication of gods of stone and steel--ships, planes, missiles, fortifications--and depend on them for protection and deliverance. When threatened, we become antienemy instead of pro-kingdom of God; we train a man in the art of war and call him a patriot, thus, in the manner of Satan's counterfeit of true patriotism, perverting the Savior's teaching:

"Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;

"That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven." (Matt. 5:44-45.)

We forget that if we are righteous the Lord will either not suffer our enemies to come upon us--and this is the special promise to the inhabitants of the land of the Americas (see 2 Ne. 1:7)--or he will fight our battles for us (Ex. 14:14; D&C 98:37, to name only two references of many). This he is able to do, for as he said at the time of his betrayal, "Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels?" (Matt. 26:53.) We can imagine what fearsome soldiers they would be. King Jehoshaphat and his people were delivered by such a troop (see 2 Chr. 20), and when Elisha's life was threatened, he comforted his servant by saying, "Fear not: for they that be with us are more than they that be with them" (2 Kgs. 6:16). The Lord then opened the eyes of the servant, "And he saw: and, behold, the mountain was full of horses and chariots of fire round about Elisha." (2 Kgs. 6:17.)

Enoch, too, was a man of great faith who would not be distracted from his duties by the enemy: "And so great was the faith of Enoch, that he led the people of God, and their enemies came to battle against them; and he spake the word of the Lord, and the earth trembled, and the mountains fled, even according to his command; and the rivers of water were turned out of their course; and the roar of the lions was heard out of the wilderness; and all nations feared greatly, so powerful was the word of Enoch." (Moses 7:13.)

What are we to fear when the Lord is with us? Can we not take the Lord at his word and exercise a particle of faith in him? Our assignment is affirmative: to forsake the things of the world as ends in themselves; to leave off idolatry and press forward in faith; to carry the gospel to our enemies, that they might no longer be our enemies.

We must leave off the worship of modern-day idols and a reliance on the "arm of flesh," for the Lord has said to all the world in our day, "I will not spare any that remain in Babylon." (D&C 64:24.)

When Peter preached such a message as this to the people on the day of Pentecost, many of them "were pricked in their heart, and said unto Peter and to the rest of the apostles, Men and brethren, what shall we do?" (Acts 2:37.)

And Peter answered: "Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and … receive the Holy Ghost." (Acts 2:38.)

As we near the year 2,000, our message is the same as that which Peter gave. And further, that which the Lord himself gave "unto the ends of the earth, that all that will hear may hear:

"Prepare ye, prepare ye for that which is to come, for the Lord is nigh." (D&C 1:11-12.)

We believe that the way for each person and each family to prepare as the Lord has directed is to begin to exercise greater faith, to repent, and to enter into the work of his kingdom on earth, which is The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. It may seem a little difficult at first, but when a person begins to catch a vision of the true work, when he begins to see something of eternity in its true perspective, the blessings begin to far outweigh the cost of leaving "the world" behind.

Herein lies the only true happiness, and therefore we invite and welcome all men, everywhere, to join in this work. For those who are determined to serve the Lord at all costs, this is the way to eternal life. All else is but a means to that end.

Captain of the Lords Hosts = Jehovah leads the army on the other side.

The enemy’s culture needs to be destroyed.  If the culture remains their wickedness still thrives so the whole civilization needed to be destroyed.  Destroy the cancer that kills, which would spread toward Israel.

Zion in the Midst of Babylon

Elder David R. Stone
Of the Seventy

We do not need to adopt the standards, the mores, and the morals of Babylon. We can create Zion in the midst of Babylon.

Last summer, my wife and I had the opportunity to travel to San Diego, California, and there see Shakespeare's Macbeth at the Old Globe Theatre. We saw two performances, because our daughter Carolyn was playing the part of one of the three witches in that play. Of course, we were delighted to see her in the play and even more delighted when, at a dramatic moment, she said those famous lines: "By the pricking of my thumbs, / Something wicked this way comes" (act 4, scene 1, lines 40–41).

When I heard that, I thought how useful it would be to have an early-warning system which would tell us about the approach of evil and allow us to be prepared for it. Evil is coming toward us, whether or not we have an early-warning system.

On a later occasion, my wife and I were driving cross-country one night and were approaching a great city. As we came over the hills and saw the bright lights on the horizon, I nudged my wife awake and said, "Behold the city of Babylon!"

Of course, there is no particular city today which personifies Babylon. Babylon was, in the time of ancient Israel, a city which had become sensual, decadent, and corrupt. The principal building in the city was a temple to a false god, which we often refer to as Bel or Baal.

However, that sensuality, corruption, and decadence, and the worshipping of false gods are to be seen in many cities, great and small, scattered across the globe. As the Lord has said: "They seek not the Lord to establish his righteousness, but every man walketh in his own way, and after the image of his own god, whose image is in the likeness of the world" (D&C 1:16).

Too many of the people of the world have come to resemble the Babylon of old by walking in their own ways, and following a god "whose image is in the likeness of the world."

One of the greatest challenges we will face is to be able to live in that world but somehow not be of that world. We have to create Zion in the midst of Babylon.

"Zion in the midst of Babylon." What a luminous and incandescent phrase, as a light shining in the midst of spiritual darkness. What a concept to hold close to our hearts, as we see Babylon becoming more widespread. We see Babylon in our cities; we see Babylon in our communities; we see Babylon everywhere.

And with the encroachment of Babylon, we have to create Zion in the midst of it. We should not allow ourselves to be engulfed by the culture which surrounds us. We seldom realize the extent to which we are a product of the culture of our place and time.

During the days of ancient Israel, the people of the Lord were an island of the one true God, surrounded by an ocean of idolatry. The waves of that ocean crashed incessantly upon the shores of Israel. Despite the commandment to make no graven image and bow down before it, Israel seemingly could not help itself, influenced by the culture of the place and time. Over and over again—despite the prohibition of the Lord, despite what prophet and priest had said—Israel went seeking after strange gods and bowed down before them.

How could Israel have forgotten the Lord, who brought them out of Egypt? They were constantly pressured by what was popular in the ambience in which they lived.

What an insidious thing is this culture amidst which we live. It permeates our environment, and we think we are being reasonable and logical when, all too often, we have been molded by the ethos, what the Germans call the zeitgeist, or the culture of our place and time.

Because my wife and I have had the opportunity to live in 10 different countries, we have seen the effect of the ethos on behavior. Customs which are perfectly acceptable in one culture are viewed as unacceptable in another; language which is polite in some places is viewed as abhorrent in others. People in every culture move within a cocoon of self-satisfied self-deception, fully convinced that the way they see things is the way things really are.

Our culture tends to determine what foods we like, how we dress, what constitutes polite behavior, what sports we should follow, what our taste in music should be, the importance of education, and our attitudes toward honesty. It also influences men as to the importance of recreation or religion, influences women about the priority of career or childbearing, and has a powerful effect on how we approach procreation and moral issues. All too often, we are like puppets on a string, as our culture determines what is "cool."

There is, of course, a zeitgeist to which we should pay attention, and that is the ethos of the Lord, the culture of the people of God. As Peter states it, "But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light" (1 Peter 2:9).

It is the ethos of those who keep the Lord's commandments, walk in His ways, and "live by every word that proceedeth forth from the mouth of God" (D&C 84:44). If that makes us peculiar, so be it.

My involvement with the building of the Manhattan temple gave me the opportunity to be in the temple quite often prior to the dedication. It was wonderful to sit in the celestial room and be there in perfect silence, without a single sound to be heard coming from the busy New York streets outside. How was it possible that the temple could be so reverently silent when the hustle and bustle of the metropolis was just a few yards away?

The answer was in the construction of the temple. The temple was built within the walls of an existing building, and the inner walls of the temple were connected to the outer walls at only a very few junction points. That is how the temple (Zion) limited the effects of Babylon, or the world outside.

There may be a lesson here for us. We can create the real Zion among us by limiting the extent to which Babylon will influence our lives.

When, about 600 years B.C., Nebuchadnezzar came from Babylon and conquered Judah, he carried away the people of the Lord. Nebuchadnezzar selected some of the young men for special education and training.

Among them were Daniel, Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah. They were to be the favored ones among the young people brought to Babylon. The king's servant instructed them that they were to eat of the king's meat and drink of the king's wine.

Let us clearly understand the pressures that the four young men were under. They had been carried away as captives by a conquering power and were in the household of a king who held the power of life or death over them. And yet Daniel and his brothers refused to do that which they believed to be wrong, however much the Babylonian culture believed it to be right. And for that fidelity and courage, the Lord blessed them and "gave them knowledge and skill in all learning and wisdom" (Daniel 1:17).

Seduced by our culture, we often hardly recognize our idolatry, as our strings are pulled by that which is popular in the Babylonian world. Indeed, as the poet Wordsworth said: "The world is too much with us" ("The World Is Too Much with Us; Late and Soon," in The Complete Poetical Works of William Wordsworth [1924], 353).

In his first epistle, John writes:

"I have written unto you . . . because ye are strong, and the word of God abideth in you, and ye have overcome the wicked one.

"Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world" (1 John 2:14–15).

We do not need to adopt the standards, the mores, and the morals of Babylon. We can create Zion in the midst of Babylon. We can have our own standards for music and literature and dance and film and language. We can have our own standards for dress and deportment, for politeness and respect. We can live in accordance with the Lord's moral laws. We can limit how much of Babylon we allow into our homes by the media of communication.

We can live as a Zion people, if we wish to. Will it be hard? Of course it will, for the waves of Babylonian culture crash incessantly against our shores. Will it take courage? Of course it will.

We have always been entranced by tales of courage of those who faced fearsome odds and overcame. Courage is the basis and foundation for all of our other virtues; the lack of courage diminishes every other virtue that we have. If we are to have Zion in the midst of Babylon, we will need courage.

Have you ever imagined that, when it came to the test, you would perform some act of bravery? I know I did, as a boy. I imagined that someone was in peril and that, at the risk of my own life, I saved him. Or in some dangerous confrontation with a fearsome opponent, I had the courage to overcome. Such are our youthful imaginations!

Almost 70 years of life have taught me that those heroic opportunities are few and far between, if they come at all.

But the opportunities to stand for that which is right—when the pressures are subtle and when even our friends are encouraging us to give in to the idolatry of the times—those come along far more frequently. No photographer is there to record the heroism, no journalist will splash it across the newspaper's front page. Just in the quiet contemplation of our conscience, we will know that we faced the test of courage: Zion or Babylon?

Make no mistake about it: much of Babylon, if not most of it, is evil. And we will not have the pricking of our thumbs to warn us. But wave after wave is coming, crashing against our shores. Will it be Zion, or will it be Babylon?

If Babylon is the city of the world, Zion is the city of God. The Lord has said of Zion: "Zion cannot be built up unless it is by the principles of the law of the celestial kingdom" (D&C 105:5) and, "For this is Zion—the pure in heart" (D&C 97:21).

Wherever we are, whatever city we may live in, we can build our own Zion by the principles of the celestial kingdom and ever seek to become the pure in heart. Zion is the beautiful, and the Lord holds it in His own hands. Our homes can be places which are a refuge and protection, as Zion is.

We do not need to become as puppets in the hands of the culture of the place and time. We can be courageous and can walk in the Lord's paths and follow His footsteps. And if we do, we will be called Zion, and we will be the people of the Lord.

I pray that we will be strengthened to resist the onslaught of Babylon and that we can create Zion in our homes and our communities—indeed, that we may have "Zion in the midst of Babylon."

We seek Zion because it is the habitation of our Lord, who is Jesus Christ, our Savior and Redeemer. In Zion and from Zion, His luminous and incandescent light will shine forth, and He will rule forever. I bear witness that He lives and loves us and will watch over us.

In the name of Jesus Christ, amen.

 

The Persistence of the Natural Man



___________________________________________

Though it is true that that natural man can be "put off" and men become "a saint" -- or a spiritual man (Mosiah 3:19) -- this does not mean that the natural man or the flesh is "dead".  We must be careful to recognize the persistence of the natural man.  Note the following statements:


Neal A. Maxwell

  • Christ’s Atonement, of course, is for super sinners and the midrange sinners and then good people who make a lot of mistakes but are not wicked! Each of these acts of drawing upon the Atonement requires us to put off the natural man.  I am persuaded that so much of taking up the cross daily –- daily, not quarterly or semiannually –-  consists of putting off the natural man (see Mosiah 3:19). Doing this involves some arduous isometrics -–  the old man working against the new spiritual man. That natural man, as you know, will not go quietly or easily. And even when he is put off, he has a way of hanging around, hoping to throw his saddle on us once again. (The Holy Ghost: Glorifying Christ, Ensign, July 2002, p. 56)
  • As you pursue your discipleship and observe the human scene, do not be surprised or unnerved by the natural man’s relentless push for preeminence and power. (“The Pathway of Discipleship,” Ensign, Sept. 1998, p. 13) 
  • Nor does the natural man or the natural woman go away quietly or easily. Hence the most grinding form of calisthenics we will ever know involves the individual isometrics required to put off the natural man. Time and again, the new self is pitted against the stubborn old self. Sometimes, just when at last we think the job is done, the old self reminds us that he or she has not fully departed yet. (“Becoming a Disciple,” Ensign, June 1996, p. 15)

 

Brigham Young

  • As I have told you, your spirit is continually warring with the flesh; your spirit dictates one way, your flesh suggests another, and this brings on the combat. (Journal of Discourses, 3:212)
  • When we receive the Gospel, a warfare commences immediately; Paul says, "for I delight in the law of God, after the inward man," but I see another law in my members warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members." We have to fight continually, as it were, sword in hand to make the spirit master of the tabernacle, or the flesh subject to the law of the spirit. If this warfare is not diligently prosecuted, then the law of sin prevails, and in consequence of this some apostatize from the truth when crossing the plains, learn to swear instead of to pray, become high-minded and high tempered instead of learning to be patient and humble, and when they arrive in these vallies they feel so self-sufficient that they consider themselves the only ones that are really right; they are filled with darkness, the authority of the Spirit is not listened to, and the law of sin and death is the ruling power in their tabernacles. (Journal of Discourses, 9:287-288)

1st Death – The Fall of Adam the natural man – Overcome by the Atonement, all receive a resurrected body, the everlasting gift from Jesus Christ.

2nd Death – Personal sin after the age of accountability – Overcome by: Faith, Repent, Baptism, Gift of the Holy Ghost (overcomes 2nd death in this life)

 

Teachings Concerning
Spiritual Death

What is Spiritual Death

Joseph Fielding Smith

Spiritual death is defined as a state of spiritual alienation from God--the eternal separation from the Supreme Being; condemnation to everlasting punishment is also called the second death. In other words, the second or spiritual death, which is the final judgment passed upon the wicked, is the same as the first death, banishment from the presence of the Lord. (Doctrines of Salvation, 2:217)
 

Bruce R. McConkie

Spiritual death is to be cast out of the presence of the Lord, to die as to the things of righteousness, to die as to the things of the Spirit. Spirit beings as such never die in the sense of annihilation or in the sense that their spirit bodies are disorganized; rather, they continue to live to all eternity either as spirits or as resurrected personages. (Mormon Doctrine, p. 756)
 

Dallin H. Oaks

Jesus Christ is also the life of the world because he has atoned for the sins of the world. By yielding to temptation, Adam and Eve were [page 65] "cut off from the presence of the Lord" (Hel. 14:16). In the scriptures this separation is called spiritual death (see Hel. 14:16; D&C 29:41). ["The Light and Life of the World," Ensign, Nov. 1987, pp. 64-65]
 

Russell M. Nelson

But there is another type of separation known in scripture as spiritual death. (See 2 Ne. 9:12; Alma 12:16; Alma 42:9; Hel. 14:16, 18.) It "is defined as a state of spiritual alienation from God." (Joseph Fielding Smith, Doctrines of Salvation, comp. Bruce R. McConkie, 3 vols., Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1954-56, 2:217.) Thus, one can be very much alive physically but dead spiritually.

Spiritual death is more likely when goals are unbalanced toward things physical. Paul explained this concept to the Romans: "If ye live after the flesh, ye shall die: but if ye through the Spirit do mortify the deeds of the body, ye shall live." (Rom. 8:13.)

If physical death should strike before moral wrongs have been made right, opportunity for repentance will have been forfeited. Thus, "the [real] sting of death is sin." (1 Cor. 15:56.)

Even the Savior cannot save us in our sins. He will redeem us from our sins, but only upon condition of our repentance. We are responsible for our own spiritual survival or death. (See Rom. 8:13-14; Hel. 14:18; D&C 29:41-45.) ["Doors of Death," Ensign, May 1992, p. 73]
 

Joseph F. Smith

  • We are called mortal beings because in us are seeds of death, but in reality we are immortal beings, because there is also within us the germ of eternal life. Man is a dual being, composed of the spirit which gives life, force, intelligence and capacity to man, and the body which is the tenement of the spirit and is suited to its form, adapted to its necessities, and acts in harmony with it, and to its utmost capacity yields obedience to the will of the spirit. The two combined constitute the soul. The body is dependent upon the spirit, and the spirit during its natural occupancy of the body is subject to the laws which apply to and govern it in the mortal state. In this natural body are the seeds of weakness and decay, which, when fully ripened or untimely plucked up, in the language of scripture, is called "the temporal death." The spirit is also subject to what is termed in the scriptures and revelations from God, "spiritual death." The same as that which befell our first parents, when, through disobedience and transgression, they became subject to the will of Satan, and were thrust out from the presence of the Lord and became spiritually dead, which the Lord says, "is the first death, even that same death which is the last death, which is spiritual, which shall be pronounced upon the wicked when I shall say, Depart, ye cursed!" And the Lord further says, "But behold, I say unto you, that I the Lord God gave unto Adam and unto his seed that they should not die as to the temporal death, until I the Lord God should send forth angels to declare unto them repentance and redemption (from the first death), through faith on the name of mine Only Begotten Son. And thus did I, the Lord God, appoint unto man the days of his probation; that by his natural death he might be raised in immortality unto eternal life, even as many as would believe; and they that believe not, unto eternal damnation, for they cannot be redeemed from their spiritual fall, because they repent not." From the natural death, that is the death of the body, and also from the first death, "which is spiritual," there is redemption through belief on the name of the Only Begotten Son, in connection with repentance and obedience to the ordinances of the gospel, declared by holy angels, for if one "believe," he must also obey; but from the "second death," even that same death which is the first death, "which is spiritual," and from which man may be redeemed through faith and obedience, and which will again be pronounced upon the wicked when God shall say, "depart, ye cursed," there is no redemption, so far as light on this matter has been revealed. (See Doc. and Cov. 29:41-44.)

It is written that "all manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men" who receive me and repent; "but the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven unto men." If men will not repent and come unto Christ, through the ordinances of his gospel, they cannot be redeemed from their spiritual fall, but must remain forever subject to the will of Satan and the consequent spiritual darkness or death unto which our first parents fell, subjecting all their posterity thereto, and from which none can be redeemed but by belief or faith on the name of the Only Begotten Son and obedience to the laws of God. But, thanks be to the eternal Father, through the merciful provisions of the gospel, all mankind will have the opportunity of escape, or deliverance, from this spiritual death, either in time or in eternity, for not until they are freed from the first can they become subject unto the second death, still if they repent not "they cannot be redeemed from their spiritual fall," and will continue subject to the will of Satan, the first spiritual death, so long as "they repent not, and thereby reject Christ and his gospel;" but what of those who do believe, repent of their sins, obey the gospel, enter into its covenants, receive the keys of the Priesthood and the knowledge of the truth by revelation and the gift of the Holy Ghost, and afterwards turn away wholly from that light and knowledge? They "become a law unto themselves," and "will to abide in sin;" of such it is written, "whoso breaketh this covenant, after he hath received it, and altogether turneth therefrom, shall not have forgiveness in this world nor in the world to come." And again, "Thus saith the Lord, concerning all those who know my power, and have been made partakers thereof, and suffered themselves, through the power of the devil, to be overcome, and to deny the truth and defy my power--they are they who are the sons of perdition, of whom I say that it had been better for them never to have been born, for they are vessels of wrath, doomed to suffer the wrath of God, with the devil and his angels in eternity; concerning whom I have said there is no forgiveness in this world nor in the world to come, having denied the Holy Spirit after having received it, and having denied the Only Begotten Son of the Father--having crucified him unto themselves, and put him to an open shame."--Doc. and Cov. 76:31-35.

Now, there is a difference between this class and those who simply repent not and reject the gospel in the flesh. Of these latter it is written, "they shall be brought forth by the resurrection of the dead, through the triumph and the glory of the Lamb," and "shall be redeemed in the due time of the Lord after the sufferings of his wrath." But of the others it is said, "they shall not be redeemed," for "they are the only ones on whom the second death shall have any power." The others, never having been redeemed from the first, cannot be doomed to the second death, or in other words cannot be made to suffer eternally the wrath of God, without hope of redemption through repentance, but must continue to suffer the first death until they repent, and are redeemed therefrom through the power of the atonement and the gospel of salvation, thereby being brought to the possession of all the keys and blessings to which they will be capable of attaining or to which they may be entitled, through the mercy, justice and power of the everlasting God; or, on the other hand, forever remain bound in the chains of spiritual darkness, bondage and banishment from his presence, kingdom and glory. The "temporal death" is one thing, and the "spiritual death" is another thing. The body may be dissolved and become extinct as an organism, although the elements of which it is composed are indestructible or eternal, but I hold it as self-evident that the spiritual organism is an eternal, immortal being, destined to enjoy eternal happiness and a fulness of joy, or suffer the wrath of God, and misery--a just condemnation, eternally. Adam became spiritually dead, yet he lived to endure it until freed therefrom by the power of the atonement, through repentance, etc. Those upon whom the second death shall fall will live to suffer and endure it, but without hope of redemption. The death of the body, or natural death, is but a temporary circumstance to which all were subjected through the fall, and from which all will be restored or resurrected by the power of God, through the atonement of Christ. (Gospel Doctrine, pp.14-16)

  • But I want to speak a word or two in relation to another death, which is a more terrible death than that of the body. When Adam, our first parent, partook of the forbidden fruit, transgressed the law of God, and became subject unto Satan, he was banished from the presence of God, and was thrust out into outer spiritual darkness. This was the first death. Yet living, he was dead--dead to God, dead to light and truth, dead spiritually; cast out from the presence of God; communication between the Father and the Son was cut off. He was as absolutely thrust out from the presence of God as was Satan and the hosts that followed him. That was spiritual death. But the Lord said that he would not suffer Adam nor his posterity to come to the temporal death until they should have the means by which they might be redeemed from the first death, which is spiritual. Therefore angels were sent unto Adam, who taught him the gospel, and revealed to him the principle by which he could be redeemed from the first death, and be brought back from banishment and outer darkness into the marvelous light of the gospel. He was taught faith, repentance, and baptism for the remission of sins, in the name of Jesus Christ, who should come in the meridian of time and take away the sin of the world, and was thus given a chance to be redeemed from the spiritual death before he should die the temporal death.

Now, all the world today, I am sorry to say, with the exception of a handful of people who have obeyed the new and everlasting covenant, are suffering this spiritual death. They are cast out from the presence of God. They are without God, without gospel truth, and without the power of redemption; for they know not God nor his gospel. In order that they may be redeemed and saved from the spiritual death which has spread over the world like a pall, they must repent of their sins, and be baptized by one having authority, for the remission of their sins, that they may be born of God. That is why we want these young men to go out into the world to preach the gospel. While they themselves understand but little, perhaps, the germ of life is in them. They have been born again, they have received the gift of the Holy Ghost, and they have the authority of the holy Priesthood, by which they can administer in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Though they may know but little in the beginning, they can learn, and as they learn they can preach, and as they have opportunity they can baptize for the remission of sins. Therefore, we want them to do their duty at home. We want them above all things to be pure in heart. (Gospel Doctrine, pp.432-433)
 
 

Atonement Overcomes Spiritual Death

 

Bruce R. McConkie

To atone is to ransom, reconcile, expiate, redeem, reclaim, absolve, propitiate, make amends, pay the penalty. Thus the atonement of Christ is designed to ransom men from the effects of the fall of Adam in that both spiritual and temporal death are conquered; their lasting effect is nullified. The spiritual death of the fall is replaced by the spiritual life of the atonement, in that all who believe and obey the gospel law gain spiritual or eternal life -- life in the presence of God where those who enjoy it are alive to things of righteousness or things of the Spirit. (Mormon Doctrine, p.62)

(2 Nephi 2:26-29.)

 

26 And the Messiah cometh in the fulness of time, that he may redeem the children of men from the fall. And because that they are redeemed from the fall they have become free forever, knowing good from evil; to act for themselves and not to be acted upon, save it be by the punishment of the law at the great and last day, according to the commandments which God hath given.

 

27 Wherefore, men are free according to the flesh; and all things are given them which are expedient unto man. And they are free to choose liberty and eternal life, through the great Mediator of all men, or to choose captivity and death, according to the captivity and power of the devil; for he seeketh that all men might be miserable like unto himself.

 

28 And now, my sons, I would that ye should look to the great Mediator, and hearken unto his great commandments; and be faithful unto his words, and choose eternal life, according to the will of his Holy Spirit;

 

29 And not choose eternal death, according to the will of the flesh and the evil which is therein, which giveth the spirit of the devil power to captivate, to bring you down to hell, that he may reign over you in his own kingdom.

 

Our spirit – directed by the Light of Christ and the Gift of the Holy Ghost

Keeping the Sabbath day holy, prayer, studying scriptures are some of the ways of keeping our spirits strong to fight off the influences of Satan.

Satan’s Influence – Media and the worldly environment around us..

There is a war between our spirit and the natural man which allows agency to take place.  Our body is very powerful and can be influenced by its environment (culture)

 Brigham Young

Many are disposed through their own wickedness "to do as I damned please," and they are damned. (Discourses of Brigham Young, p.65)

 

Purpose of Life is to Learn to Choose

Boyd K. Packer

We come into mortal life to receive a body and to be tested, to learn to choose. ("The Choice," Ensign, Nov. 1980, p. 21)

 

We Can Never Make A Choice Independent of Good or Evil Influences

Henry B. Eyring

They may mock and deride, as did a man named Korihor, with these words recorded in the Book of Mormon: "And thus ye lead away this people after the foolish traditions of your fathers, and according to your own desires; and ye keep them down, even as it were in bondage, that ye may glut yourselves with the labors of their hands, that they durst not look up with boldness, and that they durst not enjoy their rights and privileges" (Alma 30:27).

Korihor was arguing, as men and women have falsely argued from the beginning of time, that to take counsel from the servants of God is to surrender God-given rights of independence. But the argument is false because it misrepresents reality. When we reject the counsel which comes from God, we do not choose to be independent of outside influence. We choose another influence. We reject the protection of a perfectly loving, all-powerful, all-knowing Father in Heaven, whose whole purpose, as that of His Beloved Son, is to give us eternal life, to give us all that He has, and to bring us home again in families to the arms of His love. In rejecting His counsel, we choose the influence of another power, whose purpose is to make us miserable and whose motive is hatred. We have moral agency as a gift of God. Rather than the right to choose to be free of influence, it is the inalienable right to submit ourselves to whichever of those powers we choose. ("Finding Safety in Counsel," Ensign, May 1997, p. 25)

 

The Choice Between Good and Evil is the Most Important We Will Ever Make

Marion G. Romney

Let us never forget ... That we are here subject to opposing influences--the influence of Satan and his followers on the one hand, and the influence of Christ and his followers on the other hand;

That as we are being acted upon by these two influences, we are free "to choose liberty and eternal life, through the great Mediator of all men, or to choose captivity and death, according to the captivity and power of the devil." (2 Ne. 2:27.)

It is important that we keep in mind that the choices we make as we decide what is good and what is evil are the most important decisions we will ever make. Upon them depends our happiness or misery throughout time and eternity. ("The Voice of the Spirit," Ensign, Aug. 1978, p. 4)

Blessings If We Choose Right Punishments If We Choose Wrong

Neal A. Maxwell

Moral agency in the face of difficult choices was not for Adam and Eve alone (Moses 7:32; D&C 101:78). There are blessings if we choose aright and penalties if we choose wrongly. Therefore, attempting to stand between friends and the consequences of their wrong choices is not realistic; it is not nearly as useful as being lovingly at their sides before and when choices are being made. Men and women really are "free to choose" (2 Nephi 2:27), and we cannot and should not try to have it otherwise. (But for a Small Moment, p.130)

 

The Spirit can minimize Satan’s effect by building a Zion environment; these effects of the flesh can be minimized.

Good is available to all yet is corrupted by evil.

We need the electronic age to get people ready for the 2nd coming.  1st internet use – pornography, 2nd internet use – genealogy

President McKay – 1947 and 1966 – gave talks on future discoveries that will be unparalleled to any other time in history.  There will be scientific discoveries that will stagger the imagination.  The potential for good will far outweigh the bad.  The control of these discoveries will be very important.

President Kimball – Discoveries will be for our exaltation or our damnation.

General Mormon raised Moroni in a corrupt society to remain righteous.  It can be done if we build Zion while living in Babylon.

One mans sin can affect Babylon, every persons life affects someone.

(Joshua 5:9.)

 

9 And the LORD said unto Joshua, This day have I rolled away the reproach of Egypt from off you. Wherefore the name of the place is called Gilgal unto this day.

5:2-9 circumcise again the children of Israel

 

The generation born in the wilderness had not been circumcised; performing that ordinance renewed Israel's commitment and consecration.

 

5:10-15 the children of Israel encamped in Gilgal, and kept the passover...in the plains of Jericho

 

The first Passover kept by the Israelites in Canaan took place forty years after the Passover was inaugurated in Egypt on the eve of Israel's march to freedom (Josh. 5:10a; Ex. 12:11; Num. 28:16; 32:13; Deut. 29:5). The children of Israel crossed the Jordan "on the tenth day of the first month, and encamped in Gilgal" on the day each family was to select a lamb in preparation for the Passover (Josh. 4:19; 5:10; TG and BD, "Passover"). On the next day, after the Passover, they ate unleavened cakes made with grain from the previous year's harvest in Canaan, and the manna ceased to fall.

 

A heavenly messenger came "as captain of the host of the Lord" to reassure Joshua and Israel. The divinity of the messenger is indicated by his instructions to Joshua, which, like those that Moses had been given at the burning bush, were to show reverence because the place had become holy (Josh. 5:13-15a-b). His message was encouraging, and Joshua was reverent and grateful.

 

 

(Ellis T. Rasmussen, A Latter-day Saint Commentary on the Old Testament [Salt Lake City: Deseret, 1993], 209.)

Gilgal was a sanctuary city, a very important place; it was a location for their school of the prophets.   It becomes a wicked city when Israel declines.

Actions of a parent will be a blessing or they will lose their posterity.  Just like the foreskin symbolizes this to Israel, either obedience will allow posterity or we will lose it eternally.

Achan

Israel was defeated because of one man, Achan

 

One person affects all of Zion, so they need to be destroyed or he will corrupt all of Israel.

 

Zion is one heart and one mind, if someone sins then they are not a Zion people.  One man let in a wrong culture and could have corrupted the whole body.

 

God insisted on strict observance of his commands when Israel was going to war. The consequences for violations could be devastating: defeat in battle could only be rectified by the punishment of the wrongdoer, or rejection by the Lord. Thus, following a most unexpected rout of the Israelites at Ai, Joshua lay prostrate before the Ark "until the evening" in order to learn from the Lord the cause of their defeat (see Joshua 7:6). Joshua was told that "Israel has sinned; they have violated my covenant, which I commanded them to keep. They have taken some of the devoted things; they have stolen, they have lied, they have put them with their own possessions" (Joshua 7:11). Following a detailed plan that the Lord gave (and one that, interestingly, provides us with some of our best information about the tribal, clan, and familial structure of ancient Israel), Joshua was able to discover the wrongdoer, who confessed to having taken "a beautiful robe from Babylonia, two hundred shekels of silver and a wedge of gold weighing fifty shekels" (Joshua 7:21). He was stoned along with the rest of his family, then burned with the stolen goods. Only then were the Israelites able to defeat the people of Ai (see Joshua 8).

 

(Stephen D. Ricks and William J. Hamblin, eds., Warfare in the Book of Mormon [Salt Lake City and Provo: Deseret Book Co., Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies, 1990], 106.)

 

(Joshua 7:10-15.)

 

10 ¶ And the LORD said unto Joshua, Get thee up; wherefore liest thou thus upon thy face?

 

11 Israel hath sinned, and they have also transgressed my covenant which I commanded them: for they have even taken of the accursed thing, and have also stolen, and dissembled also, and they have put it even among their own stuff.

 

12 Therefore the children of Israel could not stand before their enemies, but turned their backs before their enemies, because they were accursed: neither will I be with you any more, except ye destroy the accursed from among you.

 

13 Up, sanctify the people, and say, Sanctify yourselves against to morrow: for thus saith the LORD God of Israel, There is an accursed thing in the midst of thee, O Israel: thou canst not stand before thine enemies, until ye take away the accursed thing from among you.

 

14 In the morning therefore ye shall be brought according to your tribes: and it shall be, that the tribe which the LORD taketh shall come according to the families thereof; and the family which the LORD shall take shall come by households; and the household which the LORD shall take shall come man by man.

 

15 And it shall be, that he that is taken with the accursed thing shall be burnt with fire, he and all that he hath: because he hath transgressed the covenant of the LORD, and because he hath wrought folly in Israel.

 

Achan put himself ahead of the community.  He needed to be destroyed (as a sinner) or Israel would not stand before her enemies until it got rid of the accursed thing.

 

God knows who did it and it could not be hid before the Lord.  Achan did not keep his covenants, he sinned before God.  Sin disqualifies you from every kingdom until you repent.

 

Achan put a few material things first in his life not God.  He was stoned along with his family and all of his possessions, this was a hard lesson that Israel needed to learn.

 

The impact of this is the same as when we break our temple covenants.

 

God cannot look upon sin with the least degree of allowance.

 

Joshua 8 – Israel goes back to Ai and defeats them soundly.  Israel is watching out for each other, there is strength in numbers when we try to do well.  Today, it’s like using the computer alone, have it in a place at home where others are around you.

 

Remainder of Joshua

 

July 27, 2006

 

 

East

 

 

North                            Mt. Ebal                                      Mt. Gerizim               South              

Left Hand                                                                                                         Right Hand

                                                                                                            Blessing

 

                                                                        West

 

Deuteronomy 27:14-26 – Curses for Israel if they are disobedient and break their covenant with God

                     28:15-68

 

Deuteronomy 28:1-14 – Blessing for Israel for obedience to their covenants

 

 

Moses Announces Blessings and Cursings for Israel

 

In some of the most pointed and piercing language ever written with a mortal pen, Moses blesses Israel on condition of obedience and curses her if she rejects God and walks in the ways of the world. Included in the cursings are these prophetic words: Thou "shalt be removed into all the kingdoms of the earth." Scattered Israel, all of it, all of the twelve tribes, is everywhere, in all nations. "The Lord shall bring thee, and thy king which thou shalt set over thee, unto a nation which neither thou nor thy fathers have known; and there shalt thou serve other gods, wood and stone." In the days of their initial scattering, the rebels of the house of Jacob worshipped gods of wood and stone in the literal sense; in this present age of supposed enlightenment, their seed, in whose veins the blood of Israel yet flows, worship the equally false gods of an apostate Christendom or a heathen Mohammedanism.

 

"And thou shalt become an astonishment, a proverb, and a byword, among all nations whither the Lord shall lead thee." This is particularly true of the Jews whose identity is known. "Thou shalt beget sons and daughters, but thou shalt not enjoy them; for they shall go into captivity." Interwoven with the divine announcement of the scattering of Israel is the repeated explanation as to why it occurs. It is: "Because thou servedst not the Lord thy God with joyfulness, and with gladness of heart, for the abundance of all things; therefore shalt thou serve thine enemies which the Lord shall send against thee, in hunger, and in thirst, and in nakedness, and in want of all things: and he shall put a yoke of iron upon thy neck, until he have destroyed thee" as a nation.

 

Even before Israel gained her inheritance in Canaan, Moses told them: "Ye shall be plucked from off the land whither thou goest to possess it. And the Lord shall scatter thee among all people, from the one end of the earth even unto the other; and there thou shalt serve other gods, which neither thou nor thy fathers have known, even wood and stone." This was said after Israel left Egypt, while she was in the wilderness, and before she entered the Promised Land. And part of the destined dispersion of the chosen people included this prophecy: "And the Lord shall bring thee into Egypt again and there ye shall be sold unto your enemies for bondmen and bondwomen, and no man shall buy you." (Deut. 28:14Deuteronomy 28:1-68.) Israel—scattered Israel—returns to Egypt! Moses led them out of Egypt once—out of bondage, away from Pharaoh and his gods, into a land where, as a separate people, they were free to worship the Lord and walk in his ways. But forsaking the Lord, and beginning again to worship false gods, they thereby returned to the Egypt of the world. Their deliverance a second time from Egyptian bondage occurs as they forsake the Egyptian gods, as it were, and turn again to the Lord their God.

 

After Israel is scattered and Palestine made desolate, men in all nations shall ask: "Wherefore hath the Lord done thus unto this land? what meaneth the heat of this great anger?" Why has he scattered his own chosen people to the ends of the earth? "Then men shall say, Because they have forsaken the covenant of the Lord God of their fathers, which he made with them [again] when he brought them forth out of the land of Egypt: for they went and served other gods, and worshipped them, gods whom they knew not, and whom he had not given unto them:— . . . the Lord rooted them out of their land in anger, and in wrath, and in great indignation, and cast them into another land." (Deuteronomy 29:24-28.)

 

But there is to be a day of restoration—a day when the gospel, the priesthood, the eternal covenant, and the knowledge of God and Christ and their laws shall all be revealed anew. As it is written: "It shall come to pass, when all these things are come upon thee, the blessing and the curse, which I have set before thee, and thou shalt call them to mind among all the nations, whither the Lord thy God hath driven thee, and shalt return unto the Lord thy God, and shalt obey his voice according to all that I command thee this day, thou and thy children, with all thine heart, and with all thy soul; that then the Lord thy God will turn thy captivity, and have compassion upon thee, and will return and gather thee from all the nations, whither the Lord thy God hath scattered thee." The gathering will be as extensive and all-embracing as was the scattering.

 

"If any of thine be driven out unto the outmost parts of heaven, from thence will the Lord thy God gather thee, and from thence will he fetch thee: and the Lord thy God will bring thee into the land which thy fathers possessed, and thou shalt possess it; and he will do thee good, and multiply thee above thy fathers." Israel shall be more glorious in the day of her deliverance from the second Egypt than she was when she went out from the first Egypt. In that day she shall be established in Palestine, her ancient homeland.

 

The day of gathering will be a day of conversion. "The Lord thy God will circumcise thine heart, and the heart of thy seed, to love the Lord thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, that thou mayest live. . . . And thou shalt return and obey the voice of the Lord, and do all his commandments which I command thee this day. And the Lord thy God will make thee plenteous in every work of thine hand, in the fruit of thy body, and in the fruit of thy cattle, and in the fruit of thy land, for good: for the Lord will again rejoice over thee for good, as he rejoiced over thy fathers, if thou shalt hearken unto the voice of the Lord thy God, to keep his commandments and his statutes which are written in this book of the law, and if thou turn unto the Lord thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul." (Deuteronomy 30:1-10.)

 

Is it amiss to point out that the lost sheep of Israel, as they return to the ancient sheepcote, are blessed and prospered because they keep the commandments, obey the ordinances, and walk in all the ways of the God of Israel—and not simply because they confess the Lord Jesus with their lips and assume that his atoning sacrifice has done all that is necessary to save the elect? It is obedience and personal righteousness that saves all men, Israel included.

 

 

(Bruce R. McConkie, A New Witness for the Articles of Faith [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1985],.)

 

 

How to Get Rich

 

Deuteronomy is the definitive statement of the law by which Israel is supposed to live. That law was never rescinded, but only superseded by the higher law, which embraced and reinforced all its principles. The New Testament repeats it with emphasis, as do the Book of Mormon, Doctrine and Covenants, Pearl of Great Price, the Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, the Discourses of Brigham Young, and so on. Like the Word of Wisdom, it "points our souls forward." It is preparation for more to come when we are ready to receive it, and its strict observance is the indispensible prerequisite to any further progress.

 

I have chosen the Deuteronomy version of the old law, because the reward it promises explicitly and repeatedly is success—prosperity and long life in the new land of promise. One looks in vain for direct promises of eternal life and exaltation. That is why Jacob 4:5 says that the early Nephites knew that salvation did not come by the law of Moses, but they followed it to the letter because they could not receive higher law on any other conditions; it pointed their minds forward. But Deuteronomy definitely is the plan, guide, and handbook for "success" in this world; and as such, it is accepted as no other book by Israelis today. No commentaries or comparisons are required hereafter! And the rules for them are the rules for us!

 

Chapter 5 begins with Moses announcing for the last time that in bidding farewell to the children of Israel, he is summarizing for them exactly what their law is to be (Deuteronomy 5:1). They are to consider it not as something for the ancients, a mere tradition, but something meant for "those living right now and right here" (Deuteronomy 5:3). This statement is followed by the Ten Commandments. What we are given in Deuteronomy is to be received henceforward as the law by which Israel will live; not a word is to be added to it or taken from it until God sees fit to make what changes he will (Deuteronomy 4:2). Once men start "clarifying" the words of the prophets, they can rewrite the book; God will not tolerate that. If, with the passing generations, Moses tells them, they should dilute it or corrupt it, they will not be merely reprimanded but utterly destroyed—scattered among the nations and reduced to pitifully small numbers (Deuteronomy 4:25-27). They are instructed to write the law down and memorize it (Deuteronomy 31:9). Every seven years the whole nation shall gather together and the high priest "shall read this law before all Israel in their hearing." This includes women, children, and outsiders, that all "may hear, and learn, and fear the Lord, and observe to do all the law" (Deuteronomy 31:10-12). They are to take good care of the holy book, keeping it carefully guarded in the Ark of the Covenant "for a witness against thee," that is, it will always be there as a standard to judge them by (Deuteronomy 31:25-26). Thus they will be left without excuse, "for this commandment this day . . . is not hidden from you, nor is it something far off. Not in heaven, that you should say: Who shall go up for us to heaven and bring it unto us? . . . You don't have to send anyone over the sea to fetch it, . . . but the word is very nigh unto thee, in thy mouth, and in thy heart, that thou mayest do it" (Deuteronomy 30:11-14).

 

The first rule, and one never to be forgotten, is that everything you have or ever will have, individually and collectively, is a gift from God, something that he blesses you with, has blessed you with, or will bless you with—you owe it all to him. Throughout the book, the refrain is repeated at the end of almost every pronouncement: You must do this in recognition of your dependence to God, because first and foremost he has given you your lives, he rescued you from Egypt, and he redeemed you—that is, he paid the price for you that you could not pay yourself: "And thou shalt remember that thou wast a bondman in Egypt, and Jehovah thy God redeemed thee [brought you free, paid the price, for nothing], . . . and therefore I command thee this thing today" (Deuteronomy 5:15). You are not to turn to any other source of life and guidance; "do not look to the sun or the moon or the stars" to represent me. "It is to me directly and to me only that you must turn: The Lord who brought you out of Egypt" (Deuteronomy 4:19-20). Remember that he "is God of gods, and Lord of lords, a great God, a mighty, and a terrible" (Deuteronomy 10:17); all persons are equal to him, and he cannot be bought. How can you make a deal with him when you have nothing to offer? "Behold, everything in heaven and earth belongs to him" (Deuteronomy 10:14).

 

The first thing the Israelites are to do when they have settled in their new land is to fill a basket with firstfruits, the first gifts of the land, and bring it to the priest, who sets it before the altar; then they are to recite these verses: "A Syrian ready to perish was my father, and he went down into Egypt, and sojourned there with a few, and became there a nation, great, mighty, and populous: and the Egyptians evil entreated us, and afflicted us, and laid upon us hard bondage. We called upon the Lord . . . and he heard us. . . . He brought us forth out of the land of Egypt . . . with signs and wonders, and he brought us to this place and gave us the land, a land flowing with milk and honey" (Deuteronomy 26:5-9). Why a Syrian or Aramaean? Why was he also called "Abraham the Hebrew"? All of those words denote a displaced person, a vagabond, a starving wanderer, a homeless outcast moving among wicked and haughty people. It was from such a condition, "ready to perish," that God raised them up. The great gathering and feasts, whose strict observance makes up such an important part of the old law, all have the same purpose, to remind the Israelites that everything they had was a free gift from God. In holding these solemn conferences, "you and yours—sons, daughters, servants . . . strangers, orphans, widows must all come together and rejoice and be happy," as one big happy family. That is the spirit in which this must be done, and that is the spirit of the law of consecration and the United Order. "Remember that thou wast a bondman in Egypt"—if some are slaves, all are slaves. This is to show where we stand with each other and the Lord. Thus in the Feast of the Tabernacles at the harvest, all must share, all rejoice together as one family, "thou and thy son and thy daughter, and thy manservant and thy maidservant, and the Levite, and the stranger, and the fatherless, and the widow that are within thy gates," for seven days in the appointed place. Three times a year, all males come together before Jehovah at an appointed place for the feasts of (1) unleavened bread, (2) weeks, and (3) tabernacles. And they must never come empty-handed: "Every man shall give as he is able, [that is,] according to the blessing of the Lord thy God, which he hath given thee" (Deuteronomy 16:11-17).

 

Moses reminds the people that they are about to settle down not in the lush Nile valley, but in the hill country that depends on the rains for life, "the rain of heaven"—a free gift. "If you will keep the commandments, [and so on,] . . . I will give you the rain your land needs and that at the proper seasons and in the proper amounts for maximum harvest. . . . And I will send grass for the flocks and herds as long as you take heed to yourselves. . . . If you do not, the Lord 'will shut up the heaven,' and you will get no rain and no harvest" (Deuteronomy 11:11-17). What is more, God has given good things to other nations also, some of them weaker than Israel, and all of them hostile. Those gifts of God to others are to be strictly respected. Speaking of Edomites, Ammonites, and Moabites, the Lord gave stern commandments: weaker nations are greatly concerned about the Israelite threat: "Meddle (titgaru) not with them; not an inch of their land belongs to you, because I gave it to them. I gave it all to the children of Esau" (Deuteronomy 2:5). The same applies to the Moabites (Deuteronomy 2:9) and to the Ammonites: "When you come to the children of Ammon, distress them not nor meddle with them" (Deuteronomy 2:19). He tells them that when he has a score to settle with other nations, he will let Israel know if it concerns them. Meanwhile, let no one interfere with the gifts God chooses to bestow on others!

 

The second point Moses insists on is that Israel understand very clearly that they have not earned the good things they enjoy. Beware, he says, "lest when you have eaten and are full, . . . and your silver and gold has piled up along with everything else," you get the idea that you earned it. "Then your heart will be lifted up, and you will forget the Lord thy God. . . . And you say to yourself: My ability and hard work (kokhi we-otzem yadhi) has made for me this fortune (khayil, power, influence, success). But you must keep in mind that it is God himself who has given you the koakh (capacity) to make khayil (success), for the sake of confirming the agreement (covenant) which he made with your fathers. [It is for their sake that he has blessed you.] If after that you forget in any degree any stipulation of the covenant, you will be destroyed" (Deuteronomy 8:12-20). That is why Moroni ends with his impassioned plea: "Deny not the gifts of God" (Moroni 10:8). Despise not the gifts of God. Never fail to recognize the pure gifts. No one, says King Benjamin, can so much as pay his own way. If we work day and night for twenty-four hours, we are still unprofitable servants. "Can ye say aught of yourselves? . . . [He] is preserving you from day to day, by lending you breath" (Mosiah 2:25, 21).

 

Furthermore, the Israelites are not to get the idea that because the Lord has turned out other people to give them the land, it is because of their righteousness, or that victory in the field has come to them as a reward of virtue: "Speak not thou in thine heart saying: For my righteousness the Lord hath brought me to possess the land: but rather for the wickedness of these nations the Lord doth drive them out" (Deuteronomy 9:4). This is exactly the lesson of Nephi to his brothers as they pass through those same lands. Whether or not these people were more or less wicked than Israel is for the Lord alone to decide. But here he tells them that it was not because they are righteous, but because the others were wicked; he had a score to settle with them and would have smitten them whether Israel had been anywhere around or not (1 Nephi 17:33-38). "Understand therefore, that Jehovah thy God is giving you this good land, not as a reward of righteousness, because you are not righteous; you are a stiffnecked people" (Deuteronomy 9:6). There were times when he told Moses, "Let me alone that I may destroy them and blot their names out and raise up a better people," specifically from Moses' line. When God said the Israelites were no better than the others and deserved the same, Moses was terrified at what was going to happen. He begged the Lord to spare the people just once more, "and the Lord hearkened to me at that time also" (Deuteronomy 9:13-19). Even so, he was ready to spare the very wicked cities of Sodom and Gomorrah for the sake of Abraham (Genesis 18:20-33). Again and again Moses hammers home the point: Don't get the idea that you are the good people and your enemies are the bad people: "Ye have been rebellious against the Lord ever since the day I first became acquainted with you" (Deuteronomy 9:24). And his final word to them was, "I know what a stiffnecked people you are. If you are rebellious while I am still alive . . . and will utterly corrupt yourselves, and turn aside from the way I commanded, . . . you will suffer evil accordingly" (Deuteronomy 31:27-29). "I have led you for forty years, and up to now you still have not learned. . . . Yet the Lord hath not given you a heart to perceive, and eyes to see, and ears to hear unto this day" (Deuteronomy 29:5, 4).

 

The third rule is that since God is giving it all away free to everyone, regardless of all other circumstances, everyone has a right to whatever he needs to live on. Thus if you have taken a man's coat for security, you must return it to him by sundown, because he needs it to wear or to sleep in. Whether he has paid up or not has nothing to do with it. If you feel short-changed, "Jehovah your God will give you credit," so don't worry (Deuteronomy 24:13). Under no circumstances can you take for a pledge or security a millstone or anything else upon which a person's livelihood depends (Deuteronomy 24:6).

 

In passing through anyone's vineyard, you may help yourself to whatever you can eat, but you may not carry off any in a container. If the owner denies you what you need, he is greedy; if you take more than you need, then you are greedy (Deuteronomy 23:24). In a field of grain, take what you need then and there, but don't take a sickle to cut or collect it. If you take it for profit or gain over and above what you need, you are in danger (Deuteronomy 23:25). As Paul also reminds us, it was when the people of Sodom and Gomorrah denied passing strangers and even the birds of heaven their share of the fruit on the trees that Abraham cursed them in the name of his God; according to the Midrash, their sexual aberrations were second in wickedness to such meanness of spirit. fn

 

And what does God ask us to do to requite his goodness? He does not need anything from us to show him and ourselves whether we have learned our lesson. The basic rule of his economy is that he is just and equitable: "He doth execute the judgment (mishpat) for the orphan and the widow, and he loves the stranger and wants him to be provided with food and clothing. Therefore, you must do the same: love the stranger—remember that you too were strangers [and were oppressed] in the land of Egypt" (Deuteronomy 10:18-19). Yes, we are to imitate God's freedom and bounty, to be as free with the substance he has given us as he is in giving it to us. He lets his rain fall upon the just and the unjust. He was good to you though you were disobedient; so when you give to others, never ask whether they deserve it (King Benjamin taught the same text in Mosiah 4:11-24). "And now I [the priest] have brought the firstfruits of the land, which thou, O Lord, hast given me. . . . Set it down before the Lord and worship him and rejoice in every good thing which Jehovah thy God hath given unto thee and to thy house and to the Levites and to the strangers among you" (Deuteronomy 26:10-11). (You do not have to be an Israelite to qualify.) "In the third year you start tithing, giving it to the Levite, stranger, fatherless, and widow, that they may eat within thy gates and be filled. At this time you will say: 'I have brought away the things of my house which have been sanctified, and also have given them to the Levite, stranger, fatherless, widow, according to all thy commandments. . . . I have not transgressed thy commandments, or forgotten them'" (Deuteronomy 26:12-13).

 

The word sanctified in the King James Version means the same as consecrated, set apart; and it is the law of consecration, given as it is at the culmination of all the other laws. And in all of this, Israel is being put to the test: the Feast of the Weeks requires "a tribute of a freewill offering of thine hand." The offering is required—it is tribute, but the amount is freewill; you determine it yourself, on the basis of how much the Lord has given you [the Septuagint kathoti he cheir sou ischyei means to the limit of your ability], what he has given you, even with what your God has blessed you (Deuteronomy 16:10; bless here means to give: All that with which the Lord has blessed you or with which he may bless you.) What is more, you must recognize any kindness shown you by others. Thus Israel is not to despise the Edomite or the Egyptian, though both of these had opposed and oppressed Israel, because Israel was permitted to pass through their lands in spite of everything (Deuteronomy 23:7).

 

But though we must be kind to each other, we are not to go into debt with each other. God wants us to be in debt to him alone and not to each other. This raises a problem to which the law of Moses provides the only possible solution. It is almost impossible in the world's economy to pay off a debt without incurring more debt. Young people optimistically expect to work off their indebtedness, naively overlooking their helplessness in the hands of creditors, who can always decide how much their work is worth to them. And so we find ourselves strapped. Get out of debt! we are told, but go into business! How do you do both? We hear both themes at the Credit Union banquets: "Don't borrow," the speakers tell us, "but please do your borrowing from us." God gives Israel the solution to the dilemma. Do not decide these things on the basis of your own self-interest; someone must draw the line and say, "Here this business of depending on each other must stop." Before all things, we are told today that Latter-day Saints must be independent. It is only by the law of "the Lord's release" that the massive logjam that paralyzes the world today can be broken: every seven years all debts are canceled (Deuteronomy 15:2). This is admittedly not a human arrangement—to us it appears laughable. But God absolutely insists upon it. Every seven years you must make a release (Deuteronomy 15:1). After six years of service, any and all Hebrew servants must go absolutely free no matter what you paid for them (Deuteronomy 15:12). And you can not turn them out into the world: "Thou shalt not let him go away empty" (Deuteronomy 15:13). A week's severance pay? Not at all. Again, "thou shalt furnish him liberally out of thy flock, out of thy winepress; out of whatsoever the Lord thy God hath blessed thee, thou shalt give unto him" (Deuteronomy 15:14). You know exactly what that means and what God wants you to do. But he is not holding you to any specific figure—that is up to you. That is the whole idea.

 

When men receive gifts from each other, they become dependent upon each other; and jealousy and meanness follow. The judicial order in Israel must rest on absolute fairness without respect of person. "Thou shalt not wrest judgment; thou shalt not respect persons; neither take a gift: for a gift does blind the eyes of the wise and pervert the words of the righteous" (Deuteronomy 16:19). Note well, it is not only the foolish who are blinded or the wicked who are perverted—when we start passing the gravy around, it is even the wise who are blinded and the righteous who are perverted.

 

The key to all this is the spirit in which it is done and which alone can make it workable. The first and most common word in every decree is, surprisingly, love. "And now, Israel, what doth the Lord thy God require of thee, but to fear the Lord thy God, to walk in all his ways, to love him, and to serve the Lord thy God with all thy heart and with all thy soul, to keep the commandments of the Lord, and his statutes, which I have commanded you to keep this day, all for your good" (Deuteronomy 10:12-13). The question is never raised, "Will this work, is it practical, is it sensible, is it realistic?" Quite the contrary, the main question always is whether people feel good about serving him: "O that there were such a heart in them, that they would really feel it that they would fear me and keep all my commandments always that it might be well with them and with their children forever!" (Deuteronomy 5:26). God feels for us and worries about us. His concern for our welfare is far greater than our own. Again and again a special command is introduced with the words of the first great commandment and the second follows hard upon: "Thou shalt love the Lord thy God, with all thy heart, . . . soul, . . . might. And these words, which I command thee this day, shall be in thy heart" (Deuteronomy 6:5-6). This is the main theme of Deuteronomy, and it is an admonition against that very legalism which later became the obsession of the rabbis as well as our own society.

 

But how can a law of love be legislated or enforced? Simply by the society's becoming completely immersed in it: "Thou shalt teach them diligently unto thy children, talk of them when you are sitting at home, talk of them whenever you are on the move, about town or on a journey, talk of them going to bed and getting up. Bind them on your hand and make them like a sign between the eyes" (Deuteronomy 6:7-8). (This had mystical connotations for later Judaism—the law is not only in your heart, it is written all over your person, marked in your manner and your appearance.) "And you shall write them on the mezuzoth of your houses and gateways" (Deuteronomy 6:9). This shall be ingrained in the consciousness of everyone in a natural, even unconscious, manner. One is to take advantage of every opportunity to answer children's questions and take care in various ways to stimulate the asking of those questions. Your children will hear you talking about these things, and "when at any time in future a child shall ask, 'Daddy what are these edoth [testimonies, witnesses, ordinances, the Ten Commandments, councils, assemblies, and so on] and the huqqim and the mishpatim which Jehovah our God ordered you to keep?' you shall answer by telling him the story of the deliverance from Egypt" (Deuteronomy 6:20-21). The whole thing is kept alive on a family basis with a warm and urgent appeal to take these things to heart. "Thou shalt also consider in thy heart, that as a man chasteneth his son, Jehovah your God chasteneth you"—think of him in that way, as a kind Father, who would not do anything that was not for his son's good (Deuteronomy 8:5).

 

Now comes the most important part of the business: the reaching out beyond immediate family to all the world. "If there be a poor man of your brethren living anywhere within your knowledge, in thy land which the Lord thy God giveth thee, thou shalt not harden thy heart, nor shut thy hand from thy poor brother" (Deuteronomy 15:7). These are Benjamin and Mosiah's orders also (Mosiah 4:13-25). We have no laws requiring a man to be generous or penalizing meanness of spirit, for the obvious reason that no one can know exactly what is in another's heart. But God knows, and he does require these things in his law. You shall not only give to the poor man, but you should do it magnanimously (and this is a direct order): "But thou shalt open thy hand wide unto him, and shalt surely lend him sufficient for his need of whatever he is in want" (Deuteronomy 15:8). But that is not all! It is not enough to do merely what you are told, you must do it in the right spirit without any mental reservations. In this case you are not supposed to calculate how near the day of the Lord's release is. Let us say it is only ten days away, which means that if I loan him something, he won't ever have to pay it back: "Beware that there is not a thought in thy wicked heart, saying the seventh year, the year of release is at hand; if I give anything to him now he will not have to repay it, and I will never get it back, and thine eye be evil against thy poor brother, and thou givest him nought, . . . and he cry to the Lord, and it be a sin unto thee" (Deuteronomy 15:9). (Leave the computer and the calculating alone! Remember, a gift given grudgingly is a curse on the giver.) Speaking in general terms, "Thou shalt surely give him, and thy heart shall not be grieved when thou givest unto him" (Deuteronomy 15:10). My Scottish forebears, how it hurt them to part with a penny! "Because for that thing the Lord thy God shall bless thee [no amount specified] in all thy works" (Deuteronomy 15:10). He guarantees full payment. It may seem severe to us to say, "Thou shalt not deliver unto his master the servant which is escaped from his master unto thee" (Deuteronomy 23:15). But the law goes further. Not only shall the refugee "dwell with thee . . . in that place which he shall choose," but while he is with you, "thou shalt not oppress [tonennu, grumble about, mutter under your breath, complain about] him" (Deuteronomy 23:16). When the time comes for your own servant to leave you after his six years, he does not have to leave if he has become attached to your service (Deuteronomy 15:16-17); the important thing is that if he does want to go, you must let him go cheerfully. "It shall not seem hard unto thee when thou sendest him away free"—you will be happy about it, because he has worked for you all that time, because you are doing the will of the Lord, and because you have faith in his judgment and goodness: "If you do that," the order continues, "the Lord thy God will bless thee"—you can't lose a thing (Deuteronomy 15:18).

 

If a man has two wives and loves the one and can't stand the other, and the unloved one has a son before the other, that son must inherit a double portion, for a man must always deal fairly and play no favorites (Deuteronomy 21:15-17). That is the essence of the law—complete fairness at all times.

 

But the fair thing is also the decent thing, the noble thing. "If a man take a beautiful captive to wife, he must allow her the full period of mourning for her own family, respecting her feelings and allowing her to make the transfer" (Deuteronomy 21:11-13). If after all he decides not to marry her, then she is free to go where she will. Though a captive of war, she is a free woman: "Thou shalt not make merchandise of her because thou hast humbled her" (Deuteronomy 21:14). The respect for human dignity and the feelings of others always have priority on other claims.

 

This principle is clearly shown in the rules of battle. If you have the right on your side, you are not to fear the enemy (Deuteronomy 20:1). Before the battle, the priest gives an address to the people, a pep talk, telling them, "Let not your hearts be faint, . . . for Jehovah your God goes with you to fight for you . . . and to save you." The main thing is that you know perfectly well that your own hearts and hands are pure (Deuteronomy 20:2-4). But certain men are not permitted to go into battle: "anyone who has bought a house and not yet dedicated it, or who has planted a vineyard and not yet eaten of it," for life must go on, and such homely matters have priority over the claims of the military. Indeed, they are the only justification for the military anyway, whose whole purpose is supposed to be to protect the life of the society. One who has "betrothed a wife and not yet taken her" may not go to battle, "lest he die and another man take her" (a favorite theme of wartime romances) (Deuteronomy 20:5-7). But it is mostly out of consideration for the bride. The husband may not be required to go to war or indeed to engage in any distracting business for one year—"for the sake of cheering his wife" (Deuteronomy 24:5). It is her feelings that deserve first consideration. Most significant is the rule that before the battle, the fearful and faint-hearted should be allowed and even requested to go home without prejudice, "lest his brethren's heart faint as well as his heart" (Deuteronomy 20:8). This recognizes the simple fact that all men are human and have their limits of endurance. The host is not divided into higher heroes and cowards in the Patton fashion, but into those with lower and higher thresholds of resistance to fear, with the understanding that everyone has a breaking point—Peter broke when he denied the Lord because he was scared stiff. The weak-hearted are to be dismissed in recognition of the fact that all men suffer from the same weakness—the timid soul is dangerous because the rest of us are almost as susceptible as he is and only too easily affected by his example. So we must let him go, before we get cold feet too!

 

It is always the spirit that counts. The celebrations in which everyone is generous and open-handed in recognition of God's bounty are joyous affairs. Sons, daughters, servants, strangers, orphans, and widows must all come together and rejoice and be happy as one big happy family. That is the spirit in which this must be done, and that is the spirit of the law of consecration and the United Order. "Remember that thou wast a bondman in Egypt"—if some are slaves, all are slaves. This is to show where we stand with each other and the Lord (Deuteronomy 16:11-12).

 

From all of this it would appear that the one thing God will not tolerate in his children is that meanness of spirit which would take advantage of his other children and even of him. "Thou shalt not sacrifice unto the Lord . . . any bullock, or sheep with any blemish or fault whatever or any evil-favoredness: for that is an abomination unto the Lord thy God" (Deuteronomy 17:1). Why? Because it is cheap, it is mean, the equivalent of shaving one's tithing or underestimating one's fast offering. As Isaiah reminds Israel, God does not need your offering, it is you he is testing. He does not ask us to get rich so that we can help him; as Brigham Young said so often, God has put these things into our hands so that we can show him and all the world and ourselves how we will handle them and what we will do with them. It is meanness of spirit that will disqualify us before everything else for a celestial assignment. No double bookkeeping, says the Lord. Do not "carry diverse measures with you or keep such in your house; . . . such little tricks and strategies of business to maximize profits are an abomination" (Deuteronomy 25:13-16). Those habits of thrift that were taught me as shining virtues by my Scottish forebears can easily lead to meanness, and for that we have the famous law of the gleaning: "When thou cuttest down thine harvest in thy field, and hast forgotten a sheaf in the field, thou shalt not go again to fetch it," It is not yours anymore: "It shall be for the stranger, for the fatherless, and for the widow" (Deuteronomy 24:19). Don't worry, the Lord will bless you for it. In beating the olive trees, "thou shalt not go over the boughs again" (Deuteronomy 24:20); granted that this is sound business practice, it is nonetheless forbidden. When you gather grapes in the vineyard, "thou shalt not glean it afterward" (Deuteronomy 24:21); it is for the disadvantaged. The usual explanation is given for all this: "Never forget that you were a bondsman in Egypt" (Deuteronomy 24:22).

 

Mention of processing olives and grapes brings up the word "extortion"; the literal meaning of the word "is to squeeze the last drop out of a thing." The gifts of God, we are told, which are the bounties of the earth, are to be used "with judgment, not to excess, neither by extortion" (D&C 59:20). How often it is that these last drops mean the extra profit we so eagerly pursue. And now comes one of the most famous passages in the Bible: "For the poor shall never cease out of the land" (Deuteronomy 15:11). We have given this a rather mean twist today, arguing that since the poor will always be there, it is a waste of time to help them, for that will only encourage them and make more of them. Thus we ignore the rest of the verse (I have never heard anyone quote it), which is: "Therefore I command thee, saying thou shalt open up thy hand wide unto thy brother, to thy poor, and to thy needy, in thy land" (Deuteronomy 15:11). Their perpetual presence is not to make us indifferent, but it is a constant reminder that God has his eye on us.

 

What we are warned against more than anything else is taking advantage of those who are disadvantaged—the stranger, the orphan; "nor take the widow's raiment to pledge," always remembering that you were once the disadvantaged (Deuteronomy 24:17-18). A list of things is given for which people are told they will be cursed. Of the nine specific crimes, all but one—the worship of graven images—are in the nature of taking advantage of weaker parties: holding one's aged father or mother in contempt; removing a neighbor's landmark (while he is not looking); taking advantage of a blind person, "making the blind to wander out of the way" (Deuteronomy 27:18); taking advantage of strangers, orphans, and widows with the help of lawyers; incest; striking anyone off guard, as Cain did Abel; and taking a reward to slay someone who has not offended you (the Mahan principle) (Deuteronomy 27:15-25). The one person who is held up as a monster of wickedness so evil that he should be forever forgotten by all men was Amalek, king of the Amorites, who "smote the hindmost of thee, the feeble laggards on the march; when you were faint and weary, he attacked, and he feared not God (Deuteronomy 25:17-19). The most common way of taking advantage of another's need is loaning money at interest, and this is strictly forbidden, though it is the cornerstone of our present-day economy (Deuteronomy 23:19). But even more effective is the iron law of wages, which forces a worker to accept the lowest possible pay from you because he is desperate for work—as long as his labor brings you a profit, you will continue to hire him; when it doesn't, you let him go. And in all this, you pose as his benefactor. "Thou shalt not oppress an hired servant that is poor and needy" (Deuteronomy 24:14). What is more, you must not only pay him a living wage, but you must pay him every day before sundown: "Because he is poor, and setteth his heart upon it" (Deuteronomy 24:15). Everyone has a right to his daily bread.

 

In a word, the right to life always supersedes the right to profit. Thus, "thou shalt not deliver unto his master the servant which is escaped from his master unto thee" (Deuteronomy 23:15). Here is the clear confrontation of life versus property, which played such a large role in the history of this country; apparently the pious slave owners never read this part of the Bible. And everyone knows the law that "thou shalt not muzzle the ox when he treadeth out the corn" (Deuteronomy 25:4). The beast is working for you—give him a break.

 

Indeed, "anyone stealing an Israelite to make merchandise of him or sell him outright must die" (Deuteronomy 24:7). In the ancient world, stealing and selling people into slavery was at all times one of the most profitable businesses. But in our free Anglo-Saxon tradition, it has been carried out in a more covert (and therefore more respectable) manner: press-gangs, indentured servants, slave-raids, pimping, enlistment of workers for unknown jobs that turn out to be sweatshops or labor camps, brain washing by certain cults, and so on. And here is an interesting one: criminals in the law of Israel even have human rights. When a felon is to be beaten, the judge must prescribe a set number of blows, but never one strike more than forty, regardless of the crime, "lest thy brother seem vile to thee" (Deuteronomy 25:2-3). Making those we don't like seem vile is one of the most advanced techniques of modern society.

 

The question arises, Are these laws realistic? Are they workable in the modern world? No! They are very special laws given to very special people. They are simply fantastic as far as the world is concerned. But that is just the point, says the Lord. The people of the world are not good enough to be my people. "I have called you out of the world. Your covenant is not with them, nor need you make any concessions to (tekhannem) them. Do not intermarry with them, for marriage is a covenant. You must have nothing to do with them, because you are something different from the world—holy, set apart, chosen, special—peculiar (am segullah; sealed, segulloth), not like any other people upon the face of the adamah. God will keep faith with you all the way; he is merciful and loving and wants to bless you for a thousand generations" (Deuteronomy 7:1-9). To reject such an offer of love is to incur resentment and disaster; disposed love turns to hate. If you hate him, you will have to pay for it. That is fair, because he intends to make you blessed above all other people. You will be a veritable Zion, of eternal increase, without sickness (Deuteronomy 7:10-15). You shall not follow their fashion. No cutting and tattooing (titgodadu) or shaving of eyebrows for the dead.

 

In his farewell prayer for his people, Moses calls upon the Lord: "Look down from thy holy habitation . . . and bless thy people Israel, and the land which thou hast given us, . . . flowing with milk and honey." The Lord has insisted that you observe and do these things with all your heart and soul, and you have promised and covenanted this day that you would do that. While he has covenanted with you and accepted you this day as his sealed people, the wonder of other nations is that you may be a holy people, as he has said. This is the conclusion of a prayer in which the whole emphasis is on the Levite, the stranger, the orphans and the widows (Deuteronomy 26:15-19). The best security, and in the end the only assurance of survival, is this: "That which is altogether just shalt thou follow, that thou mayest live, and inherit the land which Jehovah thy God giveth to thee" (Deuteronomy 16:20). "Ye shall not respect persons. . . . Ye shall hear the small as well as the great" (Deuteronomy 1:17). What makes this a practical and working scheme is that God himself guarantees the bottom line. If you observe all of these things, he says, you can't lose. You will be overwhelmed with blessings: blessed in the city and in the field, in families, crops, and herds, in your harvest and in your storage, in your going out and in your coming in; when your enemies rise up against you, they shall be smitten and scattered (Deuteronomy 28:1-7). But only if you keep his commandments and walk in his ways will he give you boundless prosperity; "he will open unto thee his good treasure, the heaven to give rain unto thy land in his season, . . . if you heed and carry out all his commandments, not deviating from them to right or to left" (Deut. 28:14Deuteronomy 28:12-14). You may look forward to times "when there shall be no poor among you; for the Lord shall greatly bless thee," but "only if you carefully hearken and strictly observe and do these commandments which you now receive" (Deuteronomy 15:4-5).

 

The last four chapters of Deuteronomy are devoted to the most harrowing, detailed, prophetic descriptions of what will happen to Israel if the people do not walk up to all the covenants. The Lord insists on a viable equation: the promise on the land is equal to the curse; the greater the blessing if the laws are kept, the greater the curse if they are broken. This vast land is yours, and in giving it to you, "behold, I set before you this day a blessing and a curse." For there is no contract without a penalty clause. A blessing, if ye obey, and a cursing, if ye will not obey (Deuteronomy 11:26-28). The Lord orders the heads of six tribes to pronounce the blessing on the people as they enter the land, and the heads of six others to curse the people "with a loud voice"; and after each blessing and cursing, all the people cry "Amen!" formally accepting the conditions (Deuteronomy 27:12-14). Great stones are set up and inscribed in bold, plain, legible letters so that no one can ever forget what they are committed to. Then Moses and all the priests address the people, telling them that they are formally and legally the people of the Lord, henceforward under obligation to obey his voice, observe his rules and carry out his commandments (Deuteronomy 27:2-10). After listing all the blessings in the first half of chapter 28, Moses turns to the second half, beginning, "but . . . if thou will not hearken, . . . these curses shall come upon thee" (Deuteronomy 28:15); then he lists the same blessings, but in reverse. "The curses will dog you in all your undertaking, until thou be destroyed, and until thou perish quickly" (Deuteronomy 28:20). This is the Book of Mormon situation also, which is characteristic only of Israel to this degree; other nations have sinned and suffered, and they are still in existence, still sinning and suffering, after thousands of years; but in the Old World, and the New, Israel was smashed and scattered. Epidemics, war and drought will wipe you out.

 

Reversal of the Blessings

 

1. If you do not keep the covenant you have made, "the heaven will be brass over your head and the earth will be iron under your feet" (Deuteronomy 28:23).

 

2. Your rain-clouds will be clouds of dust (Deuteronomy 28:24).

 

3. You will be destroyed like the Jaredites by the hand of the Lord, for "the Lord shall cause thee to be smitten before thine enemies: thou shalt go out one way against them, and flee seven ways before them" (Deuteronomy 28:25).

 

You will suffer crushing defeats:

 

4. You will wither away physically (Deuteronomy 28:26).

 

5. There will be most unsightly skin diseases, itches, scabs, hemorrhoids (Deuteronomy 28:27).

 

6. And also mental illness of all sorts: "madness, blindness, and astonishment of heart" (Deuteronomy 28:28).

 

7. You will "grope at noonday . . . and shalt not prosper in thy ways." Everything you try will fail (Deuteronomy 28:29).

 

8. Everything you prepare will go to someone else (Deuteronomy 28:30).

 

9. You will end up in the hands of your enemies (Deuteronomy 28:31).

 

10. Even your sons and daughters will go over to others. It will all be more than you can stand (Deuteronomy 28:32).

 

11. "So that thou shalt be mad for the sight of thine eyes which thou shalt see" (Deuteronomy 28:34). (It sounds like wild poetry—not so fantastic anymore.)

 

And it is also history for the Jews:

 

12. "The Lord shall bring thee . . . to a nation your fathers never knew" (Deuteronomy 28:36).

 

13. "Thou shalt become an astonishment, a proverb, a byword among all nations whither the Lord shall lead thee" (Deuteronomy 28:37). (The unique history of the Jews bids us take the whole scenario seriously.)

 

14. The toil and desperate moves and ultimate checks and frustrations they have had to suffer in the world—still half their own fault—is described (Deuteronomy 28:38-40).

 

15. And all this will go on "till thou be destroyed" (Deuteronomy 28:45).

 

16. "Because thou servedst not Jehovah thy God with joyfulness and with gladness of heart for the abundance of all things, therefore, shalt thou serve thine enemies?" (Deuteronomy 28:47-48). (This is how he wants you to accept his blessings, to make everybody happy.)

 

17. "The Lord shall bring a nation against thee from afar . . . whose language you don't understand" (Deuteronomy 28:49).

 

18. There will be fierce, warlike people "which shall not regard the person of the old, nor show favor to the young"—hard-faced military officers, such as rule the world today (Deuteronomy 28:50).

 

19. They will take everything over and reduce you to nothing" (Deuteronomy 28:51).

 

20. Your supplies will be reduced to the point where you prey on each other without mercy, everyone turning against everyone else (Deuteronomy 28:54).

 

21. You will suffer from chronic epidemics (Deuteronomy 28:59).

 

22. Your populations will dwindle away (Deuteronomy 28:62).

 

23. In short, "as the Lord rejoiced . . . to do you good and to multiply you, so the Lord will rejoice . . . to destroy you, and reduce you to nothing," an endangered and homeless species (Deuteronomy 28:63).

 

24. Among these nations shalt thou find no peace (Deuteronomy 28:65).

 

25. "And shalt have none assurance of thy life" (Deuteronomy 28:66). (Absolutely no security. No matter how rich and powerful they have become in many countries and in many centuries, even the greatest of them have been subject to immediate torture and death without notice.)

 

26. At night you will wish for day, and all day wish for night (Deuteronomy 28:67).

 

The next chapter begins the windup. "Ye stand this day all of you before Jehovah your God . . . that he may establish thee today for a people unto himself . . . . Let there be no one with any mental reservations as to what he has sworn to; . . . that will be gall and wormwood" (Deuteronomy 29:10, 13, 18). Someone who thinks the words of the curse will not apply to him will say: This won't bother me—I'll just go my way! But "the Lord will not spare him. . . . All the curses written in this book will be upon him." You will be bringing the fate of Sodom and Gomorrah, Admah and Zeboim upon you. People will marvel at what a desert the land has become and wonder why. Answer: "Because they have forsaken the covenants of the Lord" (Deuteronomy 29:10-25).

 

And then Moses' own testimony: "See I have set before thee this day life and good, and death and evil. Your choice is to flourish or perish. . . . I call heaven and earth to record this day against you, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing: therefore choose life . . . that thou mayest love the Lord . . . obey his voice . . . cleave unto him: for he is thy life and the length of thy days" (Deuteronomy 30:15-20).

 

Notes

 

This address was given in March 1982 in St. George, Utah.

 

 

(Hugh Nibley, Approaching Zion, edited by Don E. Norton [Salt Lake City and Provo: Deseret Book Co., Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies, 1989], 178.)

 

 

BIBLE MAPS
Canaan in Old Testament Times

1. Dan (Laish) Jeroboam set up a golden calf for the Northern Kingdom to worship (1 Kgs. 12:26-33). Dan was the northern limit of ancient Israel.

 

2. Mount Carmel Elijah challenged the priests of Baal and opened the heavens for rain (1 Kgs. 18:17-40).

 

3. Megiddo A place of many battles (Judg. 4:13-16; 5:19; 2 Chr. 35:20-23; 2 Kgs. 23:29). Solomon raised a levy to build up Megiddo (1 Kgs. 9:15). King Josiah of Judah was mortally wounded in a battle against Pharaoh Necho of Egypt (2 Kgs. 23:29-30). Megiddo is the Hebrew form of Armageddon. At the Second Coming of the Lord, a great and final conflict will take place in the Jezreel Valley, the battle of Armageddon (Joel 3:14; Rev. 16:16; 19:11-21).

 

4. Jezreel The name of a city in the largest and most fertile valley of Israel by the same name. The kings of the Northern Kingdom built a palace here (2 Sam. 2:8-9; 1 Kgs. 21:1-2). Wicked Queen Jezebel lived and died here (1 Kgs. 21; 2 Kgs. 9:30). (See “Megiddo” above.)

 

5. Beth-shan Joshua led Israel in battle (Josh. 17:12-16). Saul’s body was fastened to the walls of this fortress (1 Sam. 31:10-13).

6. Dothan Joseph was sold into slavery by his brothers (Gen. 37:17, 28; 45:4). Elisha had a vision of the mountain full of horses and chariots (2 Kgs. 6:12-17).

 

7. Samaria The Northern Kingdom’s capital (1 Kgs. 16:24-29). King Ahab built a temple to Baal (1 Kgs. 16:32-33). Elijah and Elisha ministered (1 Kgs. 18:2; 2 Kgs. 6:19-20). In 721 B.C. the Assyrians conquered it, completing the capture of the 10 tribes (2 Kgs. 18:9-10).

 

8. Shechem Abraham built an altar (Gen. 12:6-7). Jacob lived near here. Simeon and Levi massacred all the males of this city (Gen. 34:25). Joshua’s encouragement to “choose . . . this day” to serve God came in Shechem (Josh. 24:15). Here Jeroboam established the first capital of the Northern Kingdom (1 Kgs. 12).

 

9. Mount Ebal and Mount Gerizim Joshua divided Israel on these two mounts-the blessings of the law were proclaimed from Mount Gerizim, while the cursings came from Mount Ebal (Josh. 8:33). The Samaritans later built a temple on Gerizim (2 Kgs. 17:32-33).

 

10. Penuel (Peniel) Here Jacob wrestled all night with a messenger of the Lord (Gen. 32:24-32). Gideon destroyed a Midianite fortress (Judg. 8:5, 8-9).

 

11. Joppa Jonah sailed from here toward Tarshish to avoid his mission to Nineveh (Jonah 1:1-3).

 

12. Shiloh During the time of the Judges, Israel’s capital and the tabernacle were located here (1 Sam. 4:3-4).

 

13. Bethel (Luz) Here Abraham separated from Lot (Gen. 13:1-11) and had a vision (Gen. 13; Abr. 2:19-20). Jacob had a vision of a ladder reaching into heaven (Gen. 28:10-22). The tabernacle was located here for a time (Judg. 20:26-28). Jeroboam set up a golden calf for the Northern Kingdom to worship (1 Kgs. 12:26-33).

 

14. Gibeon Hivite people from here tricked Joshua into a treaty (Josh. 9). The sun stood still while Joshua won a battle (Josh. 10:2-13). This was also a temporary site of the tabernacle (1 Chr. 16:39).

 

15. Gaza, Ashdod, Ashkelon, Ekron, Gath (the five cities of the Philistines) From these cities the Philistines often made war on Israel.

16. Bethlehem Rachel was buried nearby (Gen. 35:19). Ruth and Boaz lived here (Ruth 1:1-2; 2:1, 4). It was called the city of David (Luke 2:4).

 

17. Hebron Abraham (Gen. 13:18), Isaac, Jacob (Gen. 35:27), David (2 Sam. 2:1-4), and Absalom (2 Sam. 15:10) lived here. This was the first capital of Judah under King David (2 Sam. 2:11). It is believed that Abraham, Sarah, Isaac, Rebekah, Jacob, and Leah were buried here in the cave of Machpelah (Gen. 23:17-20; 49:31, 33).

 

18. En-gedi David hid from Saul and spared Saul’s life (1 Sam. 23:29; 24:1-22)

.

19. Gerar Abraham and Isaac lived here for a time (Gen. 20-22, 26).

 

20. Beersheba Abraham dug a well here and covenanted with Abimelech (Gen. 21:31). Isaac saw the Lord (Gen. 26:17, 23-24), and Jacob lived here (Gen. 35:10; 46:1).

 

21. Sodom and Gomorrah Lot chose to live in Sodom (Gen. 13:11-12; 14:12). God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah because of wickedness (Gen. 19:24-26). Jesus later used these cities as symbols of wickedness (Matt. 10:15).

 

 

Burnt Offering – Symbol of Consecration – Put God 1st by dedicating all to the Lord

 

Keep the commandments and we will prosper in the land.  This is a major theme in the Book of Mormon.

Joshua 8 – An altar was built on Mt. Ebal, the law was read and both blessings and cursings were read to the people.

 

Theocratic government was established in Israel, the positions were as follows:

 

Elders >> Officers >> Judges >> Priests (High Priest) >> Levites >> Prophet >> God

 

Deuteronomy 18:15 – God will raise up prophets including Jesus Christ.

 

After Joshua Israel will go to a theocratic government, everyone including Gentiles living among Israel heard the law and made the covenant.

 

HITTITES IN THE LAND

 

The Hittite nation was one of the strongest with which the Israelites had to deal. Since the Hittites were such formidable opponents of Joshua and his people, some background concerning them should be of interest.

 

The Hittites were the descendants of Heth, who himself was a son of Canaan, who was a son of Ham, the son of Noah. (See Gen. 10:15.)

 

In the time of Abraham the descendants of Heth lived near Hebron; it was from one of them that Abraham purchased the cave of Machpelah as a tomb for his wife, Sarah. (Gen. 23.)

 

Esau married two Hittite women. (Gen. 26:34-35;  36:2.)

 

The Hittites were in the land when Moses sent spies to survey the area. (Num. 13:29.) Uriah, with whose wife King David committed adultery, was a Hittite who fought in the armies of Israel until he was purposely led to his death by the wickedness of David.

 

The Hittites became one of the most powerful nations of the entire Middle East in the period of the exodus.

 

They lived in an area about the size of Texas, north of Palestine in Asia Minor, now Turkey. They enjoyed great prosperity in their key position in the fabled Fertile Crescent. Their valleys and plains produced abundant crops. The seaward slopes of the mountains, especially along the Black Sea, were clad with flourishing forests. The northern shores of Asia Minor, east of the Halys River, were rich in iron deposits, which allowed the Hittites to become the earliest distributors of iron when it began to displace bronze in the Mediterranean world.

 

The Hittites learned cuneiform writing by 2000 B.C., possibly earlier. They borrowed much from the Egyptians in the line of education and art. Due to that influence, they devised a system of writing that included picture signs and phonetic values. Historians record that with these hieroglyphic signs they engraved great stone records like those of Egypt, cut into masonry walls and on rocky cliffs.

 

In their business they used the two existing forms of writing, cuneiform and hieroglyphic. The hieroglyphic records carved on stone walls have not yet been deciphered. However, it is admitted that the Hittite sculptors had little skill with a chisel.

 

Their religion centered in the worship of the great "Earth-Mother," their chief goddess, later revered in both Crete and Greece.

 

At first the Hittites had various disconnected city-states, but in about 1500 B.C. the strongest unit among them built a capital city at Khatti on the east side of the Halys River. There the kings erected imposing palaces and temples and built a great wall around the city, according to the custom of that time. This city-state then succeeded in gaining control of other Hittite kingdoms and consolidated them into one powerful nation in what is now Turkey.

 

This empire lasted for more than two hundred years (1450-1200 B.C.). It was powerful militarily and had as its chief offensive force an army of charioteers, which contributed much to the breakdown of the Egyptian Empire.

 

When these people began to work the iron mines along the Black Sea and to export iron to neighboring nations, they were responsible for opening the iron age for that region. Egypt especially began to import iron from the Hittites, who sent to Ramses II, as a special gift, a large sword made of iron.

 

It was not the Israelites who finally overcame the Hittites. It was invasion of the Greeks and the Indo-Europeans that did that.

 

Breasted describes their fall in these words:

 

During the thousand years between 200 and 1000 B.C. the Greeks thus took possession not only of the whole Greek peninsula but likewise of the entire Aegean world. . . .

 

Probably before 1500 B.C. some of these invaders of Asia Minor had become so numerous among the Hittites, who were not originally Indo-Europeans, that the Hittite communities began to lose their own tongue and to speak the Indo-European language of the newcomers. Thus the Hittite cuneiform tablets are in a language which contains Indo-European words and grammatical forms akin to those in Greek, as the new decipherment has recently shown. By 1200 B.C. a second wave of Indo-Europeans, especially the Phrygians and the Armenians, were invading the Hittite country in Asia Minor.

 

The northern Mediterranean all along its eastern end was thus being absorbed by Indo-European peoples. The result was that both the Aegeans and their Hittite neighbors in Asia Minor were overwhelmed by the advancing Indo-European line. The Hittite Empire completely collapsed. (Ancient Times, p. 255.)

 

 

(Mark E. Petersen, Joshua: Man of Faith [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1978], 26.)

 

 

Sea Peoples:

 

    1. Change bronze age to iron age
    2. Powerful group that destroys Ugarit
    3. Found hundreds of clay tablets in kilns when Ugarit was destroyed
    4. Destroys Hittite  empire, something Egypt couldn’t do
    5. Their goal was to destroy Egypt.  There are scenes in Egyptian temples depicting the battles between the two cultures.  Egypt won but at a terrible cost 

 

One group of sea peoples was the Philistines, they displace the tribe of Dan and Simeon, these two tribes move further north.

 

Samson is raised to fight and defeat the Philistines.  Israel does not exercise enough faith to defeat the Philistines until David is king.

 

Samson One of the Judges in Israel who in spite of his marriage to a Philistine woman and his numerous acts of rebellion and unrighteousness, had periods of faith and devotion during which the Lord used his great physical strength to perform almost superhuman feats for the deliverance of his people. (Judges 13, 14, 15 and 1 6.)

 

(Bruce R. McConkie, Doctrinal New Testament Commentary, 3 vols. [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1965-1973], 3: 217.)

 

 

Israel subdued the Philistines and they became economically solvent by raising olives and producing olive oil until the time of Christ.

Sea Peoples (Haunebu in Egyptian) is the term used for a mysterious confederacy of seafaring raiders who sailed into the eastern shores of the Mediterranean, invaded Cyprus, Hatti and the Levant, and attempted to enter Egyptian territory during the late 19th dynasty, and especially year 8 of Ramses III of the 20th Dynasty. The term "Sea Peoples" was never used in Egyptian records, but was popularized in the 19th century.

The earliest mention of the Sea Peoples is in an inscription of the Egyptian king Merneptah, whose rule is usually dated from 1213 BC to 1204 BC, although mention of individual groups does occur earlier (for example Denyen, during the reign of Amenhotep III, and Shardana, as mercenaries to Ramses II). Merneptah states that in the fifth year of his reign (1208 BC) he defeated an invasion of an allied force of Libyans and the Sea People, killing 6,000 soldiers and taking 9,000 prisoners.

About twenty years later the Egyptian king Ramses III was forced to deal with another invasion of the Sea Peoples. In the mortuary temple he built at Medinet Habu, in Thebes, Ramses describes how, despite the fact "no land could stand before" the forces of the Sea People and that they swept through "Hatti, Kode, Carchemish, Arzawa, and Alashiya" destroying their cities, he defeated them in a sea battle. He gives the names of the tribes of the Sea People as including: the Peleset, the Tjeker, the Shekelesh, the Denyen, and the Weshesh. However, because this list is identical to the one Merneptah had included in his victory inscription, and because Ramses also describes on his temple walls several victories known to be fictitious, some Egyptologists believe that he never actually fought the Sea Peoples, but only claimed the victories of Merneptah as his own—a common practice of a number of the Pharaohs.

The Sea Peoples appear in another set of records dated around the early 12th century BC. Ammurapi, the last king of Ugarit (c. 11911182 BC) received a letter from the Hittite king Suppiluliuma II warning him about the "Shikalayu who live on boats": compare the Shekelesh of the slightly earlier Merneptah/Ramses inscriptions. It may be relevant that shortly after he received this communication, Ammurapi was overthrown and the city of Ugarit sacked, never to be inhabited again.

 

 

Joshua 14 – the division of the land into the 12 tribes, 9 ½ and 2 ½ (later Northern kingdom Israel, Southern kingdom, Judah)

 

Joshua 18 – Tabernacle was moved from Shechem to Shiloh, later it will be destroyed by the Philistines.

 

Joshua 20 – 6 cities of refuge, those who kill in self defense or kill in another manner beside murder go here for refuge.

 

The duty of Priests and Levites is to teach the people of Israel.  They go into villages and cities to instruct the people and perform ordinances.  That is their job, they were not farmers.  Lev 10:11

 

Deuteronomy 16:18 – Judges and officers were found at all gates of cities.

 

Prophets are preachers (Isaiah, Jeremiah)

Priests and Levities are teachers

 

(Alma 1:26.)

 

26 And when the priests left their labor to impart the word of God unto the people, the people also left their labors to hear the word of God. And when the priest had imparted unto them the word of God they all returned again diligently unto their labors; and the priest, not esteeming himself above his hearers, for the preacher was no better than the hearer, neither was the teacher any better than the learner; and thus they were all equal, and they did all labor, every man according to his strength.

 

 

Nephities don’t have a theocracy for a government like Israel. 

 

Duty of preacher is to get people to hear

 

Duty of teacher is to get people to learn

 

Prophets teach the word of God by revelation.  Joshua 21, the priests and levities lived in 48 cities.  Their responsibility was to teach the scriptures and the law.  Sons of the prophets were a group who did these activities. (Elijah).  Prophets also preach against wickedness, a voice of warning, they aren’t crowd pleasers.

 

Prophets can call all people (priests and levities) to repentance.

 

(Joshua 24:14-25.)

 

14 ¶ Now therefore fear the LORD, and serve him in sincerity and in truth: and put away the gods which your fathers served on the other side of the flood, and in Egypt; and serve ye the LORD.

 

15 And if it seem evil unto you to serve the LORD, choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your fathers served that were on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: but as for me and my house, we will serve the LORD.

 

16 And the people answered and said, God forbid that we should forsake the LORD, to serve other gods;

 

17 For the LORD our God, he it is that brought us up and our fathers out of the land of Egypt, from the house of bondage, and which did those great signs in our sight, and preserved us in all the way wherein we went, and among all the people through whom we passed:

 

18 And the LORD drave out from before us all the people, even the Amorites which dwelt in the land: therefore will we also serve the LORD; for he is our God.

 

19 And Joshua said unto the people, Ye cannot serve the LORD: for he is an holy God; he is a jealous God; he will not forgive your transgressions nor your sins.

 

20 If ye forsake the LORD, and serve strange gods, then he will turn and do you hurt, and consume you, after that he hath done you good.

 

21 And the people said unto Joshua, Nay; but we will serve the LORD.

 

22 And Joshua said unto the people, Ye are witnesses against yourselves that ye have chosen you the LORD, to serve him. And they said, We are witnesses.

 

23 Now therefore put away, said he, the strange gods which are among you, and incline your heart unto the LORD God of Israel.

 

24 And the people said unto Joshua, The LORD our God will we serve, and his voice will we obey.

 

25 So Joshua made a covenant with the people that day, and set them a statute and an ordinance in Shechem.

 

 

Joshua reviews the history of the people coming out of Egypt, and puts them under covenant to remember and keep the covenants they made, theocracy was established as their government.

 

Faith – in a being they cannot see

 

Idolatry – faith in things you can see

 

Joshua gathered all the tribes of Israel to Shechem

 

Joshua's valedictory address was at Shechem, in the center of Israel's new land, a few miles north of Shiloh. As Moses had done, Joshua reviewed the reasons why the people should remain faithful and grateful to God for his blessings. He spoke of the Lord's help given in Egypt, at the Red Sea, in the wilderness, in the struggles against such opponents as King Balak and the false prophet Balaam, and in the conquest of the land. A high point in his speech, and a great gem in the Bible, is his final testimony and resolution (Josh. 24:14Josh. 24:14-15).

 

The people covenanted to be faithful, and Joshua wrote a record of it in a "book of the law of God." He set up another stone memorial to bear witness of the covenant, and the Israelites did keep it for a time, until that generation passed away (Josh. 24: 26-28, 31; Judg. 2:7-11). Sadly, the same cannot be said of many of their descendants, as they are portrayed in the books of Judges, Samuel, and Kings.

 

 

(Ellis T. Rasmussen, A Latter-day Saint Commentary on the Old Testament [Salt Lake City: Deseret, 1993], 208.)

 

 

The record states that after Israel had rested from the wars with their enemies, Joshua, who was now very old, called all Israel together. In his farewell address he reminded them they had been victorious because God had fought for them; but if they now ceased to serve the Lord and keep his law, they would be destroyed. He recalled how the Lord God of Israel had led Abraham throughout Canaan and had "multiplied his seed." (Josh. 24:3.) He reminded them of how Jacob and his children had gone down into Egypt. He told of how the Lord had been with Moses and Aaron and had brought their fathers out of Egypt; how, in all of the battles and conquests, they had prevailed, adding this significant statement: "But not with thy sword, nor with thy bow." (Josh. 24:12.) The battles had not been won by superior weaponry. They had been led by the Lord to victory. He admonished them: "Fear the Lord, and serve him in sincerity and in truth: and put away the gods which your fathers served on the other side of the flood, and in Egypt; and serve ye the Lord." (Josh. 24:14Josh. 24:14.)

 

This great military and spiritual leader then urged a commitment, and made one himself and for his family: "Choose you this day whom ye will serve; . . . but as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord." (Josh. 24:15.)

 

Here was a great statement of full commitment of a man to God; of a prophet to the desires of the Lord; and of Joshua the man to his God, who had many times previously blessed his obedience. He was telling the Israelites that regardless of how they decided, he would do what he knew was right. He was saying that his decision to serve the Lord was independent of whatever they decided; that their actions would not affect his; that his commitment to do the Lord's will would not be altered by anything they or anyone else would do. Joshua was firmly in control of his actions and had his eyes fixed on the commandments of the Lord. He was committed to obedience.

 

 

(Howard W. Hunter, That We Might Have Joy [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1994], 155.)

 

 

As Joshua's death neared (he was "going the way of all the earth" [Joshua 23:14], as was also the case with Benjamin in Mosiah 1:9), he assembled the elders (Joshua 24:1-2) to make arrangements for the continuation of the covenant (Joshua 23:1). He exhorted them to love and obey God (Joshua 23:6-8, 11), who would then assist them against their enemies (Joshua 23:3-5, 9-10). He also spoke of the curses which followed disobedience to the Law (Joshua 23:12-13, 15-16). Following these preliminary arrangements, the tribes of Israel were assembled together before God at Shechem (Joshua 24:1), where Joshua recounted to them the history of God's dealings with their forefathers (Joshua 24:2-13). He admonished them to fear God and serve Him (Joshua 24:14-15), and the people promised obedience (Joshua 24:16-18, 21). Joshua again recalled the curses which would come upon the ungodly (Joshua 24:19-20). He added, "Ye are witnesses" (cf. Mosiah 2:14), to which the people assented (Joshua 24:22). A covenant was made and written on a great stone at the sanctuary (Joshua 24:24-27), after which the people were dismissed (Joshua 24:28).

 

(John M. Lundquist and Stephen D. Ricks, eds., By Study and Also by Faith: Essays in Honor of Hugh W. Nibley on the Occasion of His Eightieth Birthday, 27 March 1990, 2 vols. [Salt Lake City and Provo: Deseret Book Co., Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies, 1990], 2: 219.)

 

Genesis 12:6 – Joshua 24:26 – Children of Israel made a covenant under this tree 400 years later.

 

 

Judges 2:1 – The angel is speaking for Jehovah.  God will never beak the covenant, but the people will because they do not obey God’s words.

 

When Christ comes, the religious offices are all corrupt, a theocracy is a distant memory, and they want a monarchy.

 

 

 

D&C 137-138

 

December 15, 2005

 

 

 

The School of the Prophets and the Hebrew school were taught inside the temple in Kirtland.    Outside teachers were hired to instruct the priesthood.  This was done to prepare them to serve missions.  Various curriculums were taught and fees were assessed to attend the classes.

 

D&C 76 & 88 = Requirements to enter the Celestial kingdom.

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 137:1-10.)

 

1 The heavens were opened upon us, and I beheld the celestial kingdom of God, and the glory thereof, whether in the body or out I cannot tell.

 

2 I saw the transcendent beauty of the gate through which the heirs of that kingdom will enter, which was like unto circling flames of fire;

 

3 Also the blazing throne of God, whereon was seated the Father and the Son.

 

4 I saw the beautiful streets of that kingdom, which had the appearance of being paved with gold.

 

5 I saw Father Adam and Abraham; and my father and my mother; my brother Alvin, that has long since slept;

 

6 And marveled how it was that he had obtained an inheritance in that kingdom, seeing that he had departed this life before the Lord had set his hand to gather Israel the second time, and had not been baptized for the remission of sins.

 

7 Thus came the voice of the Lord unto me, saying: All who have died without a knowledge of this gospel, who would have received it if they had been permitted to tarry, shall be heirs of the celestial kingdom of God;

 

8 Also all that shall die henceforth without a knowledge of it, who would have received it with all their hearts, shall be heirs of that kingdom;

 

9 For I, the Lord, will judge all men according to their works, according to the desire of their hearts.

 

10 And I also beheld that all children who die before they arrive at the years of accountability are saved in the celestial kingdom of heaven.

 

 

Verse 1 – 1st scripture given which describes some physical aspect of the Celestial kingdom.

 

Verse 2 – Only heirs will go into this kingdom, they will receive power to become the sons and daughters of God D&C 11:30.  The power was lost when we came to earth as mortals, now we need to become heirs again.

 

The Spiritual Born Again Become
the Sons and Daughters of Christ

 



Mosiah 5:7

7 And now, because of the covenant which ye have made ye shall be called the children of Christ, his sons, and his daughters; for behold, this day he hath spiritually begotten you; for ye say that your hearts are changed through faith on his name; therefore, ye are born of him and have become his sons and his daughters.

 

Bruce R. McConkie

Those who are born again not only live a new life, but they also have a new father. Their new life is one of righteousness, and their new father is God. They become the sons of God; or, more particularly, they become the sons and daughters of Jesus Christ. They bear, ever thereafter, the name of their new parent; that is, they take upon themselves the name of Christ and become Christians, not only in word but in very deed. They become by adoption the seed or offspring of Christ, the children in his family, the members of his household which is the perfect household of perfect faith. And further: Having become the sons of God (Christ), they also become joint-heirs with him of the fulness of the glory of the Father, thus becoming by adoption the sons of God the Father.

John tells us that the Lord Jesus, who came in time's meridian unto his own, was rejected by them. "But as many as received him as their Messiah and Savior, "to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name. (John 1:12.) Speaking of that same meridian day, the same Lord said in our day: "To as many as received me, gave I power to become my sons." Be it noted that true believers are not automatically born to a newness of life by the mere fact of belief alone. That belief and that acceptance of the Savior gives them power to become the sons of God. And in our day the divine word continues: "Even so will I give unto as many as will receive me, power to become my sons." And how are those who receive the Lord identified? By way of answer, he tells us: "Verily, verily, I say unto you, he that receiveth my gospel receiveth me; and he that receiveth not my gospel receiveth not me." (D&C 39:4-5.) Those who have accepted the fulness of the everlasting gospel as it has come again in our day through the instrumentality of Joseph Smith have power to become the sons of God; those who reject this heaven-sent message of salvation reject that Lord whose message it is and remain outside the Lord's family.

In addressing a congregation of contrite and penitent Nephites, King Benjamin, using that simplicity of speech and clarity of expression in which Book of Mormon prophets so excel, said to his fellow saints: "Because of the covenant which ye have made ye shall be called the children of Christ, his sons, and his daughters." They thus gain a new father, and he gains new children. "For behold, this day he hath spiritually begotten you." Their new birth is not a natural but a spiritual birth. "For ye say that your hearts are changed through faith on his name; therefore, ye are born of him and have become his sons and his daughters."

Thus it is that the saints are born of Christ because they have been born of the Spirit; they are alive in Christ because they enjoy the companionship of the Spirit, and they are members of his family because they are clean as he is clean. "And under this head ye are made free" -- being in Christ, they are free from the bondage of sin -- "and there is no other head [other than Christ our Head] whereby ye can be made free." Only those who accept Christ and receive the Spirit can free themselves from the sins of the world. "There is no other name given whereby salvation cometh; therefore, I would that ye should take upon you the name of Christ, all you that have entered into the covenant with God that ye should be obedient unto the end of your lives." (Mosiah 5:7-8.)

Those who receive the Lord Jesus and believe in their hearts that he is the Son of God by whom salvation comes; those who then covenant in the waters of baptism to serve him and keep his commandments; those who believe the gospel and are members of the earthly kingdom -- these are the ones who have power to become his sons and daughters. Thus they are the ones who take upon themselves his name.

In our day the divine word from the Lord Jesus commands: "Take upon you the name of Christ, and speak the truth in soberness. Behold, Jesus Christ is the name which is given of the Father, and there is none other name given whereby man can be saved; wherefore, all men must take upon them the name which is given of the Father, for in that name shall they be called at the last day; wherefore, if they know not the name by which they are called, they cannot have place in the kingdom of my Father." (D&C 18:21-25.)

It was ever thus. Isaiah prophesied of the "seed" of Christ. (Isaiah 53:10.) Abinadi says "his seed" consists of the prophets and saints who hearken to his word, who believe he will "redeem his people," who gain "a remission of their sins," and who are thus "heirs of the kingdom of God." (Mosiah 15:11.)

Our theologically gifted friend Paul teaches the doctrine of spiritual rebirth and of becoming sons and daughters of both the Father and the Son, explaining that true believers, converted souls, righteous saints, those who are born again, "walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit." To walk after the manner of the flesh is to live after the manner of the world; to walk after the manner of the Spirit is to overcome the world and live by the standards of the gospel. "For they that are after the flesh do mind the things of the flesh" -- they live carnal and evil lives -- but they that are after the Spirit the things of the Spirit. Theirs is a godly course of conduct. "For to be carnally minded is death; but to be spiritually minded is life and peace. Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: so then they that are in the flesh cannot please God." The Lord cannot look upon sin with the least degree of allowance. Those who live after the manner of the flesh are damned; those who bridle their passions and overcome the world are saved.

As to the saints of God, Paul says: "But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his." In the full and eternal sense even in the true church, only those saints who enjoy the companionship of the Spirit belong to the Lord; they are the only ones who are the Lord's people in the sense of gaining salvation. "And if Christ be in you, the body is dead because of sin; but the Spirit is life because of righteousness. But if the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you -- if you have the companionship of the Holy Ghost -- he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortal bodies by his Spirit that dwelleth in you." Ye shall be born again; ye shall become new creatures of the Holy Ghost; your bodies shall be quickened, shall be made new shall become fit tabernacles in which the Spirit may dwell. "Therefore, brethren, we are debtors, not to the flesh, to live after the flesh." The saints must not live in sin. "For if ye live after the flesh, ye shall die: but if ye through the Spirit do mortify the deeds of the body, ye shall live." Those who live after the manner of the world are spiritually dead; those who control the appetites of the flesh and pursue a godly course are alive spiritually. "For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God. For ye have not received the spirit of bondage again to fear." Ye are made free from the bondage of sin through Christ. "But ye have received the Spirit of adoption [of sonship], whereby we cry, Abba, Father." Abba is an Aramaic word that means father; the meaning here is that we sense and feel our newly found relationship with God the Father and hence feel free to address him in a friendly and familiar way.

"The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God: And if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ; if so be that we suffer with him, that we may be also glorified together." That is, because we have been adopted into the family of Christ, because we have taken his name upon us, and because he has accepted us in full, we are also accepted by his Father. We become joint-heirs with the Son. We are adopted into a state of sonship by the Father. Christ is his natural heir, and as adopted sons, we become joint-heirs, receiving, inheriting, and possessing as does the Natural Heir. Because we conform "to the image of his Son," we are also "glorified" with him. (Romans 8:4-30.) And thus in like manner, the inhabitants of all worlds "are begotten sons and daughters unto God" the Father through the atonement of Christ the Son. (D&C 76:24.) [A New Witness for the Articles of Faith, pp. 284-287]

 

 

Verse 3 – The blazing throne (singular) where the Father and the Son sit Revelations 3:21.  The throne is symbolic of the power of God

 

Verse 5 – November 1823 Alvin died, Christ’s church was restored in 1830.

 

Verses 7-10 – The rest of the vision answered his question

 

A Vision of the Celestial Kingdom

 

The season of heavenly manifestations was inaugurated by the Prophet's vision of the Father and Son in the celestial glory. On the evening of 21 January 1836, about forty men entered the nearly completed Kirtland Temple. Although the outside plastering had been completed, workers were busy at that time plastering and painting the interior. While climbing the circular staircase, these bearers of the priesthood passed the second floor, which resembled the first with four tiers of pulpits on either end of the room. They continued to the third floor, an attic which had been divided into five classrooms. About sixteen of these men gathered in the west room, which was then being used as a classroom by students studying Hebrew. Accompanying Joseph Smith were his two counselors and his father (who was serving as patriarch), Hyrum Smith, the two bishoprics (one from Missouri and the other residing in Kirtland), and Joseph Smith's scribe, Warren Parrish. fn

 

After the Prophet had introduced one of the ordinances connected with the Kirtland endowment—the ordinance of anointing—Joseph Smith testified that "the heavens were opened upon us," and he "beheld the celestial kingdom of God, and the glory thereof." He saw the "blazing throne of God, whereon was seated the Father and Son." He saw "the beautiful streets of that kingdom, which had the appearance of being paved with gold." He also saw in vision in the celestial kingdom "Father Adam and Abraham," his father (who was in the room at the time of the vision), his mother, his deceased brother, Alvin, and the twelve apostles who had been called in 1835 (D&C 137:1-5). fn Joseph further declared that his scribe saw some of the same heavenly beings who appeared to him. fn

 

Since Joseph Smith did not understand at that time the concept of salvation for the dead, the Prophet was perplexed when he saw his brother Alvin in the celestial kingdom, for Alvin had died before the Church was fully organized. Therefore, during this vision the Prophet asked a question and received the initial revelation on this subject: all, including children, who would have accepted the gospel had they been granted such an opportunity are "heirs of the celestial kingdom of God" (D&C 137:7D&C 137:7-10). fn

 

Before this remarkable series of visions ended, the high councils from Kirtland and Missouri entered the room, received their anointings, and were blessed with the ministering of angels. The Prophet added that while some of these leaders communed with holy angels, others "saw the face of the Savior" and the spirit of prophecy and revelation was poured out in mighty power. When Oliver Cowdery attempted to describe this unusual meeting, he wrote, the "glorious scene" was "too great to be described." "I only say," he added, "the heavens were opened to many, and great and marvelous things were shown." fn

 

 

(Robert L. Millet and Kent P. Jackson, eds., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 1: The Doctrine and Covenants [Salt Lake City: Deseret

 

 

Salvation beyond the Grave

(D&C 137 and 138)

 

ROBERT L. MILLET

 

Elder Boyd K. Packer, in speaking to a group of Church educators, remarked: "We live in a day of great events relating to the scriptures. It has been only a short time since two revelations were added to the standard works." Then, after making brief reference to what are now sections 137 and 138 of the Doctrine and Covenants, he continued: "I was surprised, and I think all of the Brethren were surprised, at how casually that announcement of two additions to the standard works was received by the Church. But we will live to sense the significance of it; we will tell our grandchildren and our great-grandchildren, and we will record in our diaries, that we were on the earth and remember when that took place." fn

 

The Vision of the Celestial Kingdom

 

The historical setting of Joseph Smith's Vision of the Celestial Kingdom (D&C 137) is both inspiring and informative. The headquarters of the Saints had moved from New York and Pennsylvania to Ohio. By 1831 two Church centers were organized, one in Kirtland and the other in Missouri (Zion). Joseph Smith and his people received a commandment as early as 1833 to build a temple in Kirtland and were given profound promises. The Lord instructed that they "should build a house, in the which house I design to endow those whom I have chosen with power from on high" (D&C 95:8). Truly the sacrifices of the Saints brought forth the blessings of heaven as God rewarded the works of his chosen people with a marvelous outpouring of light and truth. fn

 

Joseph and the early leaders of the Church had begun to meet in the temple before its completion, and had participated in washings, anointings, and blessings, all in preparation for what came to be known as the Kirtland Endowment. On Thursday evening, 21 January 1836, the Prophet and a number of Church leaders from Kirtland and Missouri had gathered in the third or attic floor of the Kirtland Temple (in the translating or "President's Room"). After anointings and after all the presidency had laid their hands upon the Prophet's head and pronounced many glorious blessings and prophecies, a mighty vision burst upon the assembled leadership. fn

 

The heavens were opened upon us, and I beheld the celestial kingdom of God, and the glory thereof, whether in the body or out I cannot tell.

 

I saw the transcendent beauty of the gate through which the heirs of that kingdom will enter, which was like unto circling flames of fire;

 

Also the blazing throne of God, whereon was seated the Father and the Son.

 

I saw the beautiful streets of that kingdom, which had the appearance of being paved with gold (vv. 1-4).

 

Joseph had learned by vision in February of 1832 the nature of those who would inherit the highest heaven, the celestial. These persons are they who "overcome by faith, and are sealed by the Holy Spirit of Promise," they "into whose hands the Father has given all things" (D&C 76:53, 55). The Prophet's Vision of the Celestial Kingdom was not unlike John the Revelator's vision of the holy city, the earth in its sanctified and celestial state. "The foundations of the wall of the city," writes John, "were garnished with all manner of precious stones." Further, "the street of the city was pure gold, as it were transparent glass" (Rev. 21:19, 21).

 

Joseph's account of the Vision continues: "I saw Father Adam and Abraham; and my father and my mother; my brother Alvin, that has long since slept; And marveled how it was that he had obtained an inheritance in that kingdom, seeing that he had departed this life before the Lord had set his hand to gather Israel the second time, and had not been baptized for the remission of sins" (D&C 137:5-6). Joseph Smith's brief view of the celestial kingdom permitted him to witness specific personalities who had proven true and faithful in all things, and thus had qualified for exaltation. Adam, the first man and father of the race, had sought the Lord and found him. "Abraham received all things," a revelation stated, "whatsoever he received, by revelation and commandment . . . and hath entered into his exaltation and sitteth upon his throne" (D&C 132:29). That Joseph's vision was a glimpse into the future celestial realm is evident from the fact that he saw his parents—Joseph Sr. and Lucy Mack—in the kingdom of the just, when in fact both were still living in 1836. Father Smith was, interestingly, in the same room with his son at the time the vision was received.

 

Alvin Smith was born on 11 February 1798 in Tunbridge, Vermont, the first-born of Joseph Sr. and Lucy Mack Smith. His was a pleasant and loving disposition, and he always sought out opportunities to aid the family in their continual financial struggles. Joseph Jr. later described his oldest brother as one in whom there was no guile. fn "He was a very handsome man, surpassed by none but Adam and Seth." fn Lucy Mack writes that on the morning of 15 November in 1823, "Alvin was taken very sick with the bilious colic." One physician hurried to the Smith home and administered calomel to Alvin. The dose of calomel "lodged in his stomach," and on the third day of sickness, Alvin became aware of the fact that death was near. He asked that each of the Smith children come to his bedside for his parting counsel and final expression of love. As his mother later recalled, "When he came to Joseph, he said, 'I am going to die, the distress which I suffer, and the feelings that I have, tell me my time is very short. I want you to be a good boy, and do everything that lies in your power to obtain the Record [Joseph had been visited by Moroni less than three months before this time]. Be faithful in receiving instruction, and in keeping every commandment that is given you."' fn Alvin died on 19 November. Lucy Mack Smith wrote of the pall of grief surrounding his passing: "Alvin was a youth of singular goodness of disposition— kind and amiable, so that lamentation and mourning filled the whole neighborhood in which he resided." fn Alvin's brother Joseph wrote many years later: "I remember well the pangs of sorrow that swelled my youthful bosom and almost burst my tender heart when he died. He was the oldest and noblest of my father's family. . . . He lived without spot from the time he was a child. . . . He was one of the soberest of men, and when he died, the angel of the Lord visited him in his last moments." fn

 

Inasmuch as Alvin had died some seven years before the formal organization of the Church (and thus had not been baptized by proper authority), Joseph wondered how it was possible for Alvin to have attained the highest heaven. Alvin's family had been shocked and saddened at his funeral when they heard the Presbyterian minister announce that Alvin would be consigned to hell, having never officially been baptized or involved in the church. William Smith, Alvin's younger brother, recalls: "Hyrum, Samuel, Katherine, and mother were members of the Presbyterian Church. My father would not join. He did not like it because of Rev. Stockton had preached my brother's funeral sermon and intimated very strongly that he had gone to hell, for Alvin was not a church member, but he was a good boy and my father did not like it." fn What joy and excitement must have filled the souls of both Joseph Jr. and Joseph Sr. as they heard the voice of an omniscient and omni-loving God: "Thus came the voice of the Lord unto me, saying: All who have died without a knowledge of this gospel, who would have received it if they had been permitted to tarry, shall be heirs of the Celestial kingdom of God; Also all that shall die henceforth without a knowledge of it, who would have received it with all their hearts, shall be heirs of that kingdom; For I, the Lord, will judge all men according to their works, according to the desire of their hearts" (D&C 137:7D&C 137:7-9).

 

God does not and will not hold anyone accountable for a gospel law of which he was ignorant. Every person will have opportunity— here or hereafter—to accept and apply the principles of the gospel of Jesus Christ. Only the Lord, the Holy One of Israel, is capable of "keeping the gate" and thus discerning completely the hearts and minds of mortal men; he alone knows when a person has received sufficient knowledge or impressions to constitute a valid opportunity to receive the Plan of Salvation. Joseph had reaffirmed that the Lord will judge men not only by their actions, but also by their attitudes—the desires of their hearts (cf. Alma 41:3).

 

One of the most profoundly beautiful of doctrines is that enunciated in the Vision of the Celestial Kingdom regarding the status of children who die before the time of accountability: "And I also beheld that all children who die before they arrive at the years of accountability are saved in the Celestial Kingdom of heaven" (D&C 137:10). King Benjamin had learned from an angel that "the infant perisheth not that dieth in his infancy" (Mosiah 3:18). After having described the nature of those who will come forth in the first resurrection, Abinadi said simply: "And little children also have eternal life" (Mosiah 15:25). A revelation given to Joseph Smith in September of 1830 specified that "little children are redeemed from the foundation of the world through mine Only Begotten" (D&C 29:46; cf. JST, Matt. 19:13-15). Joseph Smith taught in 1842 that "the Lord takes many away even in infancy, that they may escape the envy of man, and the sorrows and evils of this present world; they were too pure, too lovely, to live on earth; therefore, if rightly considered, instead of mourning we have reason to rejoice as they are delivered from evil, and we shall soon have them again." fn By virtue of his infinite understanding of the human family, "we may assume that the Lord knows and arranges beforehand who shall be taken in infancy and who shall remain on earth to undergo whatever tests are needed in their cases." fn These children will come forth from the grave as they lie down—as children— fn and will grow to maturity in the Millennium. They will not be expected to face tests or temptations in their resurrected state, but will go on to enjoy the highest and grandest blessings of exaltation associated with the everlasting continuation of the family unit. fn

 

Four and one-half years after Joseph Smith's Vision of the Celestial Kingdom the Prophet delivered his first public discourse on the subject of baptism for the dead at the funeral of Seymour Brunson, a member of the Nauvoo High Council. One man who was in attendance at the funeral has left us the following account:

 

I was present at a discourse that the Prophet Joseph delivered on baptism for the dead 15 August 1840. He read the greater part of the 15th chapter of Corinthians and remarked that the Gospel of Jesus Christ brought glad tidings of great joy . . . . He also said the apostle [Paul] was talking to a people who understood baptism for the dead, for it was practiced among them. He went on to say that people could now act for their friends who had departed this life, and that the plan of salvation was calculated to save all who were willing to obey the requirements of the law of God. He went on and made a very beautiful discourse. fn

 

One month later, on 14 September 1840, Joseph Smith, Sr. passed away. Just before his death, Father Smith requested that someone be baptized for and in behalf of his oldest son, Alvin. Hyrum Smith complied with his father's last wishes, and was baptized by proxy for Alvin in 1840 and again in 1841. fn Alvin received the endowment by proxy on 11 April 1877, and was sealed to his parents on 25 August 1897. fn

 

The Vision of the Redemption of the Dead (D&C 138)

 

The knowledge of a universal salvation revealed initially through the Prophet Joseph continued to be expanded and elaborated as the ongoing Restoration made further truths available "line upon line." It is to the Prophet's nephew—Joseph F. Smith—that we now turn for precious insights into the manner in which the gospel is preached in the world of spirits.

 

During the last six months of his life, President Joseph F. Smith suffered from the effects of advancing years (he was in his 80th year) and spent much of his time in his personal study in the Beehive House. President Smith did manage to garner enough strength to attend the 89th semi-annual conference of the Church (October 1918). At the opening session of the conference (Friday, October 4th) he arose to welcome and address the Saints, and with a voice filled with emotion, spoke the following:

 

As most of you, I suppose, are aware, I have been undergoing a siege of very serious illness for the last five months. It would be impossible for me, on this occasion, to occupy sufficient time to express the desires of my heart and my feelings, as I would desire to express them to you. . . .

 

I will not, I dare not, attempt to enter upon many things that are resting upon my mind this morning, and I shall postpone until some future time, the Lord being willing, my attempt to tell you some of the things that are in my mind, and that dwell in my heart. I have not lived alone these last five months. I have dwelt in the spirit of prayer, of supplication, of faith and of determination; and I have had my communication with the Spirit of the Lord continuously. fn

 

According to the President's son, Joseph Fielding Smith, the Prophet was here expressing (albeit in broadest terms) the fact that during the past half-year he had been the recipient of numerous manifestations, some of which he had shared with his son, both before and following the conference. One of these manifestations, the Vision of Redemption of the Dead, had been received just the day before, on 3 October, and was recorded immediately following the close of the conference. fn

 

The aged Prophet's attention was drawn to the world beyond mortality by his frequent confrontation with death. His parents, Hyrum and Mary Fielding Smith, both died while he was a young man. Among the great trials of his life none was more devastating than the passing of many of his children into death. President Smith was possessed of an almost infinite capacity to love, and thus the sudden departure of dear ones brought extreme anguish and sorrow. Joseph Fielding Smith later wrote: "When death invaded his home, as frequently it did, and his little ones were taken from him, he grieved with a broken heart and mourned, not as those who mourn who live without hope, but for the loss of his 'precious jewels' dearer to him than life itself." fn

 

On 20 January 1918 Hyrum Mack Smith, oldest son of Joseph F. and then a member of the Council of the Twelve Apostles, was taken to the hospital for a serious illness, where the physicians diagnosed a ruptured appendix. Despite constant medical attention and repeated prayers, Hyrum M.—then only 45 years of age and at the time with a pregnant wife—died on the night of 23 January. This was a particularly traumatic affliction for the President. Hyrum had been called as an apostle at the same conference wherein his father had been sustained as the Church's sixth president (October 1901). Hyrum Mack was a man of depth and wisdom beyond his years, and his powerful sermons evidenced his unusual insight into gospel principles. "His mind was quick and bright and correct," remarked President Smith. "His judgment was not excelled, and he saw and comprehended things in their true light and meaning. When he spoke, men listened and felt the weight of his thoughts and words." Finally, the Prophet observed: "He has thrilled my soul by his power of speech, as no other man ever did. Perhaps this was because he was my son, and he was filled with the fire of the Holy Ghost." fn Already in a weakened physical condition due to age, the Prophet's sudden sense of loss caused him "one of the most severe blows that he was ever called upon to endure." fn

 

Even though President Smith indicated in October of 1918 that the preceding six months had been a season of special enrichment, in fact it may be shown that the last thirty months of his life (specifically, from April 1916 to October 1918) represent a brief era of unusual spiritual enlightenment, in which he delivered to the Church some of the most important and inspiring insights of this dispensation.

 

At the April 1916 general conference President Smith delivered a remarkable address, the thrust of which established a theme for the next thirty months of his life, and most important for this discussion, laid the foundation for his final doctrinal contribution—the Vision of the Redemption of the Dead. In his opening sermon entitled "In the Presence of the Divine," Joseph F. spoke of the nearness of the world of spirits, and of the interest and concern for us and our labors exercised by those who have passed beyond the veil. He stressed that those who labored so diligently in their mortal estate to establish the cause of Zion would not be denied the privilege of "looking down upon the results of their own labors" from their post-mortal estate. In fact, the President insisted, "they are as deeply interested in our welfare today, if not with greater capacity, with far more interest, behind the veil, than they were in the flesh." Perhaps the keynote statement of the Prophet in this sermon was the following: "Sometimes the Lord expands our vision from this point of view and this side of the veil, so that we feel and seem to realize that we can look beyond the thin veil which separates us from that other sphere." fn This remark, both penetrating and prophetic, set the stage for the next two and one-half years.

 

In June of 1916 the First Presidency and the Twelve released a doctrinal exposition in pamphlet form entitled "The Father and the Son." This document was delivered to alleviate doctrinal misunderstandings concerning the nature of the Godhead, and specifically the role and scriptural designation of Jesus Christ as "Father." fn

 

One of the most significant fruits of this segment of time was a talk delivered by President Joseph F. Smith at a Temple Fast Meeting in February of 1918, entitled "The Status of Children in the Resurrection." In this address we gain not only an insight into the power and prophetic stature of one schooled and prepared in doctrine; in addition, we are allowed a brief glimpse into the heart of a noble father who—having lost little ones to death and having mourned their absence—rejoices in the sure knowledge that: (1) mortal children are immortal beings, spirits who continue to live and progress beyond the veil; and (2) as taught by the Prophet Joseph Smith, children will come forth from the grave as they lie down—as children—and such persons will thereafter be nurtured and reared to physical maturity by worthy parents. "O how I have been blessed with these children," exulted President Smith, "and how happy I shall be to meet them on the other side!" fn

 

Further evidence that the veil had become thin for Joseph F. is to be found in his recording (on 7 April 1918) of a dream/vision he had received many years earlier, while on his first mission to Hawaii. The dream had served initially to strengthen the faith and build the confidence of a lonely and weary fifteen-year-old on the slopes of Haleakala on the island of Maui; it had, through the years that followed, served to chart a course for Joseph F. and give to him the assurance that his labors were acceptable to the Lord, and that he also had the approbation of his predecessors in the presidency of the restored Church. In the dream young Joseph F. encountered his uncle, the Prophet Joseph, and was fortified in his desire to remain free from the taints of the world. In addition, he learned at an early age that the separation between mortality and immortality is subtle, and that the Lord frequently permits an intermingling of the inhabitants of the two spheres. fn

 

As finite man stands in the twilight of life, he is occasionally able to view existence with divine perspective and is thus capable of opening himself to the things of infinity. "If we live our holy religion," President Brigham Young taught in 1862, "and let the Spirit reign," the mind of man "will not become dull and stupid, but as the body approaches dissolution the spirit takes a firmer hold on the enduring substance behind the veil, drawing from the depths of that eternal Fountain of Light sparkling gems of intelligence which surround the frail and sinking tabernacle with a halo of immortal wisdom." fn This poignant principle was demonstrated beautifully in the life of President Joseph F. Smith. Here was a man who met death and sorrow and persecution with a quiet dignity, and thus through participating in the fellowship of Christ's sufferings was made acquainted with the things of God. On Thursday, 3 October 1918, President Smith, largely confined to his room because of illness, sat meditating over matters of substance. On this day the Prophet specifically began to read and ponder upon the universal nature of the Atonement, and the Apostle Peter's allusions to Christ's post-mortal ministry. The stage was set: preparation of a lifetime and preparation of the moment were recompensed with a heavenly endowment—the Vision of the Redemption of the Dead. In the words of the President: "As I pondered over these things which are written, the eyes of my understanding were opened, and the Spirit of the Lord rested upon me, and I saw the hosts of the dead, both small and great" (D&C 138:11).

 

Joseph F. Smith saw in vision "an innumerable company of the spirits of the just," the righteous dead from the days of Adam to the meridian of time. These all were anxiously awaiting the advent of the Christ into their dimension of life, and were exuberant in their anticipation of an imminent resurrection (vv. 12-17). Having consummated the atoning sacrifice on Golgotha, the Lord of the living and the dead passed in the twinkling of an eye into the world of the departed. The dead, having "looked upon the long absence of their spirits from their bodies as a bondage" (v. 50; cf. D&C 45:17), were, in a sense, in prison. Yes, even the righteous sought "deliverance" (vv. 15, 18); the Master came to declare "liberty to the captives who had been faithful" (v. 18). As Peter had said, Christ went beyond the veil to preach "unto the spirits in prison" (1 Pet. 3:19). Joseph Smith had taught: "Hades, Sheol, paradise, spirits in prison, are all one; it is a world of spirits." fn And as Elder Bruce R. McConkie has explained, in this vision "it is clearly set forth that the whole spirit world, and not only that portion designated as hell, is considered to be a spirit prison." fn

 

To the congregation of the righteous the Lord appeared, and "their countenances shone, and the radiance from the presence of the Lord rested upon them" (v. 24). President Smith observed as the Lord taught "the everlasting gospel, the doctrine of the resurrection and the redemption of mankind from the fall, and from individual sins on conditions of repentance" (v. 19). In addition, Christ extended to the righteous spirits "power to come forth, after his resurrection from the dead, to enter into his Father's kingdom, there to be crowned with immortality and eternal life" (v. 51).

 

It is while pondering the question of how the Savior could have taught the gospel to so many in the spirit world in so short a time (the time intervening between his death on Friday and his rise from the tomb on Sunday morning) that President Smith received what may well be the most significant doctrinal insight of the entire vision. The President came to understand "that the Lord went not in person among the wicked and disobedient"—those in hell—but rather "organized his forces and appointed messengers, clothed with power and authority," that such representatives might carry the message of the gospel "unto whom he [the Lord] could not go personally, because of their rebellion and transgression" (vv. 20-22, 25-30, 37). The chosen messengers "declare the acceptable day of the Lord." They carry the gospel message to those who had no opportunity in mortality to accept or reject the truth, and also to those who rejected the message on earth. These (who are visited by messengers) are taught the first principles and ordinances of the gospel (including the vicarious nature of the ordinances), in order that the inhabitants of the world of spirits might be judged and rewarded by the same divine standards as those who inhabit the world of mortals (vv. 31-34). The insight that Christ did not personally visit the disobedient is a doctrinal matter introduced to the Church for the first time in October of 1918 and does much to broaden our scope and answer questions with regard to the work within that sphere.

 

By the power of the Holy Ghost President Smith perceived the identity of many of the noble and great from the beginning of time, including Adam, Seth, Noah, Abraham, Isaiah, the Nephite prophets before Christ, and many more. In addition, the President recognized Mother Eve and many of her faithful daughters. Joseph F. had taught a number of years earlier that women minister to women in the spirit world, even as they do in holy places on earth. fn

 

It would appear at this point that President Smith's vision shifted in time—from a first century A.D. gathering to a scene of workers in the spirit world during the final gospel dispensation. A change in time-frame is common in visions, as can be seen from the experiences of Nephi (1 Ne. 13-14), John the Apostle (Rev. 11-12), and Joseph Smith (D&C 76). President Smith saw in the spirit world his predecessors in the presidency of the restored Church, and other noble leaders who played such a critical role "in laying the foundations of the great latter-day work" (vv. 53-54).

 

It may be that the vision shifted again in time, allowing President Smith a glimpse into the pre-mortal world. He observed that the great leaders of the latter-day Church were "among the noble and great ones who were chosen in the beginning to be rulers in the Church of God," and he became aware of their pre-mortal lessons, preparation, and foreordination (w. 55-56).

 

President Joseph F. Smith's vision confirms another doctrine that had been taught by Joseph Smith: the faithful in this life continue to teach and labor in the world of spirits in behalf of those who know not God (v. 57). As recorded in George Laub's Journal under date of 12 May 1844, the Prophet Joseph declared: "Now all those die in the faith goe to the prison of Spirits to preach to the deaf in body, but they are alive in the Spirit & those Spirits preach to the Spirits that they may live according to god in the Spirit and men do minister for them in the flesh" (sic). fn Joseph F. had taught this doctrine on a number of occasions; fn here he became an eyewitness of the same.

 

Having laid before us his remarkable vision—"a complete and comprehensive confirmation of the established doctrine of the Church where salvation for the dead is concerned" fn—President Smith climaxed his doctrinal contribution with testimony: "Thus was the vision of the redemption of the dead revealed to me, and I bear record, and I know that this record is true, through the blessing of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, even so. Amen" (v. 60).

 

The Vision of the Redemption of the Dead was dictated by President Smith to his son—Joseph Fielding Smith—at the close of the October 1918 conference. The vision was presented to the First Presidency, Twelve, and Patriarch in a Council Meeting on Thursday, 31 October 1918. Because of his weakened condition, the President was not able to be in attendance but asked Joseph Fielding to read the revelation to the gathered general authorities. Note the following from the journal of Anthon H. Lund, first counselor to President Smith: "In our Council Joseph F. Smith, Jr. read a revelation which his father had had in which he saw the spirits in Paradise and he also saw that Jesus organized a number of brethren to go and preach to the spirits in prison, but did not go himself. It was an interesting document and the apostles accepted it as true and from God." fn Elder James E. Talmage of the Council of the Twelve Apostles recorded the following in his personal journal:

 

Attended meeting of the First Presidency and the Twelve. Today President Smith who is still confined to his home by illness, sent to the Brethren the account of a vision through which, as he states, were revealed to him important facts relating to the work of the disembodied Savior in the realm of departed spirits, and of the missionary work in progress on the other side of the veil. By united action the Council of the Twelve, with the Counselors in the First Presidency, and the Presiding Patriarch accepted and endorsed the revelation as the word of the Lord. President Smith's signed statement will be published in the next issue (December) of the Improvement Era, which is the organ of the Priesthood quorums of the church. fn

 

The text of the vision first appeared in the 30 November edition of the Deseret News. It was printed in the December Improvement Era, and in the January 1919 editions of the Relief Society Magazine, the Utah Genealogical and Historical Magazine, the Young Women's Journal, and the Millennial Star.

 

President Smith's physical condition worsened during the first weeks of November, 1918. On Sunday, 17 November he was taken with an attack of pleurisy, which finally developed into pleuropneumonia. Tuesday morning, 19 November 1918 his work in mortality was completed. It was fitting that at the April 1919 general conference Elder James E. Talmage should deliver the following touching and appropriate tribute to the President. Elder Talmage asked: "Well, where is he now?" The apostle answered: "He was permitted shortly before his passing to have a glimpse into the hereafter, and to learn where he would soon be at work. He was a preacher of righteousness on earth, he is a preacher of righteousness today. He was a missionary from his boyhood up, and he is a missionary today amongst those who have not yet heard the gospel, though they have passed from mortality into the spirit world. I cannot conceive of him as otherwise than busily engaged in the work of the Master." fn

 

Conclusion

 

The Lord loves all of his children and desires that every soul have the privilege of participating in the principles and ordinances of the gospel of Jesus Christ. The doctrine of salvation for the dead, given by revelation through Joseph Smith, and expanded through a remarkable vision of Joseph F. Smith, broadens our own perspective and points us toward the eternities. Joseph Smith's Vision of the Celestial Kingdom opens us to the reality of an omniscient and omni-loving God. Joseph F. Smith's Vision of the Redemption of the Dead sets forth with remarkable clarity the manner in which the Savior "declared liberty to the captives" in the meridian of time, and also unfolds the pattern by which the doctrines of salvation continue to be made known in the world beyond the grave. And so it is that the work of redemption goes forward on both sides of the veil. "Because of this," Peter taught the Saints, "is the gospel preached to them who are dead, that they might be judged according to men in the flesh, but live in the spirit according to the will of God" (JST, 1 Pet. 4:6.)

 

Notes Salvation Beyond the Grave

 

1. "Teach the Scriptures," in Charge to Religious Educators, 2nd ed. (Salt Lake City: Church Educational System, 1982), p. 21; this is the text of a talk delivered to CES personnel 14 October 1977, Salt Lake City.

 

2. See Milton V. Backman, Jr. and Robert L. Millet, "Heavenly Manifestations in the Kirtland Temple," found herein.

 

3. Ibid.; see also HC 2:378-80.

 

4. HC 5: 126.

 

5. Ibid., p. 247

 

6. Lucy Mack Smith, History of Joseph Smith, Preston Nibley, ed. (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1958), pp. 86-89.

 

7. Ibid., p. 88.

 

8. HC 5: 126-27.

 

9. See an interview with William Smith by E. C. Briggs and J. W. Peterson, published in the Deseret News (Salt Lake City), 20 January 1894.

 

10. HC 4:553.

 

11. Bruce R. McConkie, expressing the sentiments of President Joseph Fielding Smith, in "The Salvation of Little Children," Ensign, April 1977, p. 6.

 

12. HC 4:555-56.

 

13. McConkie, "The Salvation of Little Children," pp. 5-6; see also Joseph Fielding Smith, Doctrines of Salvation, 3 vols. (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1954-56), 2:54-57.

 

14. A report by Simon Baker in Journal History, under date of 15 August 1840, LDS Church Archives; also in Andrew F. Ehat and Lyndon W. Cook, The Words of Joseph Smith (Provo, Ut.: Religious Studies Center, Brigham Young University, 1980), p. 49; see also HC 4:231.

 

15. "Nauvoo Baptisms for the Dead," Book A, Church Genealogical Society Archives, pp. 145, 149.

 

16. From Joseph Smith, Sr. Family Group Sheet, Church Genealogical Society Archives.

 

17. "Joseph F. Smith, Conference Report, October 1918, p. 2.

 

18. Joseph Fielding Smith, The Life of Joseph F. Smith (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Company, 1969), p. 466.

 

19. Ibid., p. 455.

 

20. Ibid., p. 474.

 

21. Ibid.

 

22. Conference Report April 1916, pp. 1-8.

 

23. See Improvement Era, August 1916, pp. 93442; James R. Clark, comp., Messages of the First Presidency, 6 vols. (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1971), 5:23-34.

 

24. Improvement Era, May 1918, pp. 567-74; Clark, Messages of the First Presidency, 5:90-98.

 

25. Improvement Era, November 1919, pp. 16-17; Clark, Messages of the First Presidency, 5:99-101; Smith, Life of Joseph F. Smith, pp. 44547.

 

26. JD 9:288.

 

27. HC 5:425.

 

28. Bruce R. McConkie, "A New Commandment: Save Thyself and Thy Kindred," Ensign, August 1976, p. 11.

 

29. See Joseph F. Smith, Young Women's Journal 23 (1911): pp. 128-32; Gospel Doctrine (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1971), p. 461.

 

30. Ehat and Cook, The Words of Joseph Smith, p. 370.

 

31. See Gospel Doctrine, pp. 134-35, 460-61.

 

32. Bruce R. McConkie, "A New Commandment: Save Thyself and Thy Kindred," Ensign, August 1976, p. 11.

 

33. Anthon H. Lund Journal, LDS Church Archives, Salt Lake City; under date of 31 October 1918.

 

34. James E. Talmage Journal, LDS Church Archives, Salt Lake City; under date of 31 October 1918.

 

35. Conference Report, April 1919, p. 60.

 

 

(Robert L. Millet and Kent P. Jackson, eds., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 1: The Doctrine and Covenants [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1989], 549.)Book Co., 1989], 419.)

 

 

This was the 1st revelation relative to the spirit world.

 

(Alma 40:9-14.)

 

9 Therefore, there is a time appointed unto men that they shall rise from the dead; and there is a space between the time of death and the resurrection. And now, concerning this space of time, what becometh of the souls of men is the thing which I have inquired diligently of the Lord to know; and this is the thing of which I do know.

 

10 And when the time cometh when all shall rise, then shall they know that God knoweth all the times which are appointed unto man.

 

11 Now, concerning the state of the soul between death and the resurrection—Behold, it has been made known unto me by an angel, that the spirits of all men, as soon as they are departed from this mortal body, yea, the spirits of all men, whether they be good or evil, are taken home to that God who gave them life.

 

12 And then shall it come to pass, that the spirits of those who are righteous are received into a state of happiness, which is called paradise, a state of rest, a state of peace, where they shall rest from all their troubles and from all care, and sorrow.

 

13 And then shall it come to pass, that the spirits of the wicked, yea, who are evil—for behold, they have no part nor portion of the Spirit of the Lord; for behold, they chose evil works rather than good; therefore the spirit of the devil did enter into them, and take possession of their house—and these shall be cast out into outer darkness; there shall be weeping, and wailing, and gnashing of teeth, and this because of their own iniquity, being led captive by the will of the devil.

 

14 Now this is the state of the souls of the wicked, yea, in darkness, and a state of awful, fearful looking for the fiery indignation of the wrath of God upon them; thus they remain in this state, as well as the righteous in paradise, until the time of their resurrection.

 

Alma asks for a revelation concerning the spirit world, what is between death and resurrection?

 

An angel reveals the information to Alma.  This information was not known among the Nephites, and Alma must have recently received the information since he did not teach it to his sons earlier.

 

He knows of the division of Paradise and spirit prison, Satan has no influence in Paradise, and there are different areas in spirit prison, including a place called outer darkness.   You will go to an area you are most comfortable with.

 

Verse 12 – The righteous (those right with the law) enter into baptismal covenants and other covenants and honor them.  They enter paradise.

 

Verses 13-14 – The wicked or those who have no part of the Spirit of the Lord, who choose evil works are captive to the will of Satan.  They remain in this state until their resurrection.

 

 BETWEEN DEATH AND RESURRECTION

 

Before discussing the doctrine of resurrection and the law of restoration—the principle that all people will be raised to that level of glory commensurate with the lives they lived in mortality—Alma turned his attention to a discussion of the postmortal spirit world, a matter he had "inquired diligently of the Lord to know" (Alma 40:9Alma 40:9). He explained that, according to what he had been taught by an angel, "the spirits of all men, as soon as they are departed from this mortal body, yea, the spirits fn of all men, whether they be good or evil, are taken home to that God who gave them life" (Alma 40:11). "Then shall the dust return to the earth as it was," said the Preacher, "and the spirit shall return unto God who gave it" (Ecclesiastes 12:7).

 

Both of these scriptural preachers were speaking in broadest terms and should not be interpreted to mean that the spirit—at the time of death—goes into the immediate presence of the Lord. President Brigham Young explained that to speak of the spirit returning to the God who gave it means that "when the spirits leave their bodies they are in the presence of our Father and God" in the sense that they "are prepared then to see, hear and understand spiritual things." fn To go into the "presence" of God is not necessarily to be "placed within a few yards or rods, or within a short distance of his person." fn President George Q. Cannon explained: "Alma, when he says that 'the spirits of all men, as soon as they are departed from this mortal body, . . . are taken home to that God who gave them life,' has the idea, doubtless, in his mind that our God is omnipresent—not in His own personality but through His minister, the Holy Spirit. He does not intend to convey the idea that they are immediately ushered into the personal presence of God. He evidently uses that phrase in a qualified sense." fn

 

The transition from time into eternity is immediate. As the physical self breathes its last breath, the spirit self passes through a veil separating this world from the next. At this point the spirit experiences what might be called a "partial judgment." fn Those who have been true and faithful to their trust in mortality, Alma explained, are received into paradise, "a state of rest, a state of peace, where they shall rest from all their troubles and from all care, and sorrow" (Alma 40:12). As I have written elsewhere, "those things which burdened the obedient—the worldly cares and struggles, the vicissitudes of this life—are shed with the physical body. Paradise is a place where the spirit is free to think and act with a renewed capacity and with the vigor and enthusiasm that characterized one in his prime. Though a person does not rest per se from the work associated with the plan of salvation . . . , at the same time he is delivered from those cares and worries associated with a fallen world and a corrupt body." fn

 

Those, on the other hand, who have been wicked on earth—who gave themselves up to the lusts and lasciviousness of the flesh—shall be received into that portion of the spirit world called hell or outer darkness, fn a place of "weeping, and wailing, and gnashing of teeth, and this because of their own iniquity, being led captive by the will of the devil" (Alma 40:13). Joseph Smith explained: "The great misery of departed spirits in the world of spirits, where they go after death, is to know that they come short of the glory that others enjoy and that they might have enjoyed themselves, and they are their own accusers." fn On another occasion the Prophet taught: "A man is his own tormentor and his own condemner. Hence the saying, They shall go into the lake that burns with fire and brimstone. The torment of disappointment in the mind of man is as exquisite as a lake burning with fire and brimstone. I say, so is the torment of man." fn Hell is both a place—a part of the world of spirits where suffering and sorrow and repentance take place—and a state—a condition of the mind associated with remorseful realization. The righteous remain in paradise and the wicked in hell until the time of their resurrection (see Alma 40:14). fn

 

 

(Robert L. Millet, The Power of the Word: Saving Doctrines from the Book of Mormon [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1994], 168.)

 

 

 

The Spirit World. Because the Bible has no clear definition of resurrection, it is also without definition of the spirit world. If it is not understood that in his final state man will enjoy the inseparable union of body and spirit, there is no reason to raise the question as to what becomes of the spirit of man from the time of death to the time of resurrection. Alma, knowing that body and spirit are reunited in the resurrection, could then ask, What becomes of the spirit while it awaits the day of its reunion with its body and its consignment to its eternal reward? In response to his query an angel of the Lord explained that the spirit went to a world of spirits, a world divided into two parts-paradise, the abode of the righteous, and outer darkness (typically referred to by Latter-day Saints as hell), the abode of those who chose evil works rather than good. (alma 40:9Alma 40:6-15.)

 

(Joseph Fielding McConkie and Robert L. Millet, Doctrinal Commentary on the Book of Mormon, 4 vols. [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1987-1992], 1: 13.)

 

 

D&C 138 – Joseph F. Smith was born in Far West November 1838.

 

 (Doctrine and Covenants 138:13.)

 

13 And who had offered sacrifice in the similitude of the great sacrifice of the Son of God, and had suffered tribulation in their Redeemer's name.

 

 

We submit all to the building up of the Lord’s kingdom.

 

 

Leviticus 1 – The order of sacrifice:

 

    1. Head – Intellect, study, mind
    2. Fat – Energy
    3. Innards – Heart, emotions
    4. Legs – Course of ones life
    5. Carcass – Our all to the kingdom

 

 

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 138:18-27.)

 

18 While this vast multitude waited and conversed, rejoicing in the hour of their deliverance from the chains of death, the Son of God appeared, declaring liberty to the captives who had been faithful;

 

19 And there he preached to them the everlasting gospel, the doctrine of the resurrection and the redemption of mankind from the fall, and from individual sins on conditions of repentance.

 

20 But unto the wicked he did not go, and among the ungodly and the unrepentant who had defiled themselves while in the flesh, his voice was not raised;

 

21 Neither did the rebellious who rejected the testimonies and the warnings of the ancient prophets behold his presence, nor look upon his face.

 

22 Where these were, darkness reigned, but among the righteous there was peace;

 

23 And the saints rejoiced in their redemption, and bowed the knee and acknowledged the Son of God as their Redeemer and Deliverer from death and the chains of hell.

 

24 Their countenances shone, and the radiance from the presence of the Lord rested upon them, and they sang praises unto his holy name.

 

25 I marveled, for I understood that the Savior spent about three years in his ministry among the Jews and those of the house of Israel, endeavoring to teach them the everlasting gospel and call them unto repentance;

 

26 And yet, notwithstanding his mighty works, and miracles, and proclamation of the truth, in great power and authority, there were but few who hearkened to his voice, and rejoiced in his presence, and received salvation at his hands.

 

27 But his ministry among those who were dead was limited to the brief time intervening between the crucifixion and his resurrection;

 

The Savior went to the righteous to organize the work in the spirit world.

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 138:30-37.)

 

30 But behold, from among the righteous, he organized his forces and appointed messengers, clothed with power and authority, and commissioned them to go forth and carry the light of the gospel to them that were in darkness, even to all the spirits of men; and thus was the gospel preached to the dead.

 

31 And the chosen messengers went forth to declare the acceptable day of the Lord and proclaim liberty to the captives who were bound, even unto all who would repent of their sins and receive the gospel.

 

32 Thus was the gospel preached to those who had died in their sins, without a knowledge of the truth, or in transgression, having rejected the prophets.

 

33 These were taught faith in God, repentance from sin, vicarious baptism for the remission of sins, the gift of the Holy Ghost by the laying on of hands,

 

34 And all other principles of the gospel that were necessary for them to know in order to qualify themselves that they might be judged according to men in the flesh, but live according to God in the spirit.

 

35 And so it was made known among the dead, both small and great, the unrighteous as well as the faithful, that redemption had been wrought through the sacrifice of the Son of God upon the cross.

 

36 Thus was it made known that our Redeemer spent his time during his sojourn in the world of spirits, instructing and preparing the faithful spirits of the prophets who had testified of him in the flesh;

 

37 That they might carry the message of redemption unto all the dead, unto whom he could not go personally, because of their rebellion and transgression, that they through the ministration of his servants might also hear his words.

 

The righteous are appointed as messengers to go forth to carry the gospel to those in darkness; they are the best forces to get them back.  They preach to the captives who would repent of their sins and receive the gospel.  There are those who died in their sins without knowledge of the truth or they rejected the prophets.

 

They are taught the Plan of Salvation, the 4 principles of the gospel, and other necessary principles and ordinances to qualify themselves for eternal glory.  All of these are done because of the Atonement of Christ.  Our Savior instructed and organized the faithful saints to carry the message to all the dead to whom He could not go personally.

 

2nd Estate = Mortality & Spirit World (Paradise and Spirit Prison) There is much growth and development in Paradise.

 

In speaking at the funeral for Judge Elias Higbee on 13 August 1843, the Prophet stated: "That which hath been hid from before the foundation of the world is revealed to babes and sucklings in the last days. The world is reserved unto burning in the last days. He shall send Elijah the prophet, and he shall reveal the covenants of the fathers in relation to the children, and the covenants of the children in relation to the fathers." He referred to the four angels of Revelation 7, described in modern revelation as "four angels sent forth from God, to whom is given power over the four parts of the earth, to save life and to destroy; these are they who have the everlasting gospel to commit to every nation, kindred, tongue, and people; having power to shut up the heavens, to seal up unto life, or to cast down to the regions of darkness" (D&C 77:8; emphasis added). The Prophet then declared: "Four destroying angels holding power over the four quarters of the earth until the servants of God are sealed in their foreheads, which signifies sealing the blessing upon their heads, meaning the everlasting covenant, thereby making their calling and election sure. When a seal is put upon the father and mother, it secures their posterity, so that they cannot be lost, but will be saved by virtue of the covenant of their father and mother" (Smith, Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, 320-21; emphasis added).

 

Howard and Martha Coray recorded that same sermon as follows: "God shall send unto them Elijah the prophet and he shall reveal unto them the covenants of the fathers with relation to the children and the covenants of the children in relation to the Fathers that they may have the privilege of entering into the same in order to effect their mutual salvation" (Smith, Words of Joseph Smith, 240; punctuation and spelling standardized). Franklin D. Richards recorded the Prophet's words as follows: "Judge Higbee would say that covenants either there or here must be made in view of eternity. The covenant sealed on the foreheads of the parents secured the children from falling [and] that they shall all sit upon thrones as one with the godhead, joint heirs of God with Jesus Christ" (Smith, Words of Joseph Smith, 241; emphasis added and punctuation and spelling standardized).

 

What does this mean? To what degree can righteous parents, fathers and mothers who have entered into and kept sacred covenants, affect and effect the salvation of their posterity? President Brigham Young taught: "Let the father and mother, who are members of this Church and kingdom, take a righteous course, and strive with all their might never to do a wrong, but to do good all their lives; if they have one child or one hundred children, if they conduct themselves towards them as they should, binding them to the Lord by their faith and prayers, I care not where those children go, they are bound up to their parents by an everlasting tie, and no power on earth or hell can separate them from their parents in eternity; they will return again to the fountain from whence they sprang" (in Journal of Discourses, 11:215; emphasis added). We think of the sufferings and pleadings of Alma the Elder and his wife and remember the words of the angel to the wandering son: "Behold, the Lord hath heard the prayers of his people, and also the prayers of his servant, Alma, who is thy father; for he has prayed with much faith concerning thee that thou mightest be brought to the knowledge of the truth; therefore, for this purpose have I come to convince thee of the power and authority of God, that the prayers of his servants might be answered according to their faith" (Mosiah 27:14).

 

William Clayton's account of the Prophet Joseph's funeral address contains the following: "When speaking of the passage 'I will send Elijah the prophet etc.,' he said it should read: 'And he shall turn the hearts of the children to the covenant made with their fathers'" (Smith, Words of Joseph Smith, 241-42; punctuation standardized). We believe that those who are faithful in their first estate come to the earth with certain predispositions to receive and embrace the truth. The Prophet himself declared that those of the house of Israel who come into the Church do so with quiet receptivity to the Spirit of the Lord and an openness to pure intelligence (see Smith, Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, 149-50).

 

Similarly, we have no difficulty speaking of the "spirit of Elijah" reaching out, touching, directing, and impelling individuals to search out their dead and perform the saving ordinances. Why should we have difficulty believing that the power of the covenant will reach out, touch, redirect, and impel the wandering sheep? Could that power be indeed the same spirit of Elijah, the spirit that turns the hearts of the children to the covenant made with their fathers?

 

Elder Orson F. Whitney taught powerfully: "You parents of the wilful and the wayward! Don't give them up. Don't cast them off. They are not utterly lost. The Shepherd will find his sheep. They were his before they were yours——long before he entrusted them to your care; and you cannot begin to love them as he loves them. They have but strayed in ignorance from the Path of Right, and God is merciful to ignorance. Only the fulness of knowledge brings the fulness of accountability. Our Heavenly Father is far more merciful, infinitely more charitable, than even the best of his servants, and the Everlasting Gospel is mightier in power to save than our narrow finite minds can comprehend.

 

"The Prophet Joseph Smith declared——and he never taught more comforting doctrine——that the eternal sealings of faithful parents and the divine promises made to them for valiant service in the Cause of Truth, would save not only themselves, but likewise their posterity. Though some of the sheep may wander, the eye of the Shepherd is upon them, and sooner or later they will feel the tentacles of Divine Providence reaching out after them and drawing them back to the fold. Either in this life or in the life to come, they will return. They will have to pay their debt to justice; they will suffer for their sins; and may tread a thorny path; but if it leads them at last, like the penitent Prodigal, to a loving and forgiving father's heart and home, the painful experience will not have been in vain. Pray for your careless and disobedient children; hold on to them with your faith. Hope on, trust on, till you see the salvation of God" (in Conference Report, Apr. 1929, 110; emphasis added).

 

In our own day, Elder Boyd K. Packer has provided a comforting context and reaffirmation for the promise to faithful parents: "It is a great challenge to raise a family in the darkening mists of our moral environment.

 

"We emphasize that the greatest work you will do will be within the walls of your home (see Harold B. Lee, in Conference Report, April 1973, p. 130), and that 'no other success can compensate for failure in the home' (see David O. McKay, in Conference Report, April 1935, p. 116).

 

"The measure of our success as parents, however, will not rest solely on how our children turn out. That judgment would be just only if we could raise our families in a perfectly moral environment, and that now is not possible.

 

"It is not uncommon for responsible parents to lose one of their children, for a time, to influences over which they have no control. They agonize over rebellious sons and daughters. They are puzzled over why they are so helpless when they have tried so hard to do what they should. It is my conviction that those wicked influences one day will be overruled. . . .

 

"We cannot overemphasize the value of temple marriage, the binding ties of the sealing ordinance, and the standards of worthiness required of them. When parents keep the covenants they have made at the altar of the temple, their children will be forever bound to them" (in Conference Report, Apr. 1992, 94-95; emphasis added).

 

 

(Robert L. Millet, When a Child Wanders [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1996], 111 - 112.)

 

 

 

 

The Spirit World

 

 

Often Church members suffer from a lack of perspective, perhaps understandably, as to the vastness and intensity of the Lord's work in the spirit world. The scope is enormous! Demographers estimate that some sixty to seventy billion people have lived on this planet thus far. Without diminishing in any way the importance of the absolutely vital and tandem work on this side of the veil, we do need a better grasp of "things as they really will be" (Jacob 4:13). Otherwise, we can so easily come to regard family history as a quaint hobby and its resulting temple work as something we will get around to later.

 

Not only does the word vastness characterize the work there but so does intensity. Of course, we still lack many details and would like to know more. Even so, we ought to pay closer attention to what has been given about the spirit world so that we can truly "cite [our] minds forward" in appropriate ways (Alma 13:1).

 

Let us begin with paradise and Alma's description of that special destination to be reached after death but on the way to immortality and eternal life:

 

"And then shall it come to pass, that the spirits of those who are righteous are received into a state of happiness, which is called paradise, a state of rest, a state of peace, where they shall rest from all their troubles and from all care, and sorrow" (Alma 40:12).

 

Some derive from these words that rest means no work and merely languid passivity. In fact, the rest described is from the troubles, cares, and sorrows of this world.

 

To begin with, a certain peacefulness and restfulness will occur in paradise, because the faithful will see things with a more complete, restful, and reassuring perspective. Nonetheless, the faithful will soon be caught up fully and be "anxiously engaged” in the vast work underway in all the spirit world (D&C 58:27). So many of the cares and demands of the world which press upon us here and now, including doing the chores of this world, will not dominate us there. Hence, paradise will be, comparatively, "a state of peace." Furthermore, the spirit body will not suffer certain of the ills and constraints which now beset the mortal body. The result will be added zestfulness there, as described by Elder John Taylor:

 

"[Death] this dark shadow and valley is so trifling . . . [one is] passed from a state of sorrow [and] grief, . . . into a state of existence where I can enjoy life to the fullest extent as far as that can be done without a body. . . . I thirst no more, I want to sleep no more, I hunger no more, I tire no more, I run, I walk, I labor, . . . nothing like pain or weariness, I am full of life, full of vigor."1

 

Further illustrative of the consuming scope and intensity of the work there is the following exchange between the martyred Prophet Joseph Smith and President Wilford Woodruff:

 

"Joseph Smith continued visiting myself. . . . He said he could not stop to talk with me because he was in a hurry. . . . I saw the Prophet again. . . .

 

"'Now,' said I, 'I want to know why you are in a hurry. I have been in a hurry all my life; but I expected my hurry would be over when I got into the kingdom of heaven, if I ever did.'

 

"Joseph said: ' . . . Every dispensation . . . has had a certain amount of work to do . . . Each dispensation has had ample time. . . . We have not. We are the last dispensation, and so much work has to be done, and we need to be in a hurry in order to accomplish it.'"2

 

The work being done there with such intensity, however, is not a random, hectic, and disorganized thing. Instead, unsurprisingly, it proceeds in a very orderly manner. Following is an account by President Heber C. Kimball, reflecting earlier conversations among members of the First Presidency Brigham Young, Heber C. Kimball, and Jedediah M. Grant given at President Grant's funeral in December 1856:

 

"[Brother Grant] said to me, brother Heber, I have been into the spirit world two nights in succession, and, of all the dreads that ever came across me, the worst was to have to again return to my body, though I had to do it. But O, says he, the order and government that were there! When in the spirit world, I saw the order of righteous men and women; beheld them organized in their several grades, and there appeared to be no obstruction to my vision; I could see every man and woman in their grade and order. I looked to see whether there was any disorder there, but there was none; neither could I see any death nor any darkness, disorder or confusion. He said that the people he there saw were organized in family capacities; and when he looked at them he saw grade after grade, and all were organized and in perfect harmony. . . . 'Why, it is just as brother Brigham says it is; it is just as he has told us many a time. . . .'

 

"He saw the righteous gathered together in the spirit world, and there were no wicked spirits among them. . . .

 

"'To my astonishment,' he said, 'when I looked at families there was a deficiency in some, there was a lack, for I saw families that would not be permitted to come and dwell together, because they had not honored their calling here.'"3 Families do not guarantee automatic individual salvation.

 

The vastness of the work in the spirit world of preaching the gospel is confirmed in the 1918 vision of President Joseph F. Smith, which was accepted by the Church in 1976 as a revelation. That work is proceeding, "even to all the spirits of men" (D&C 138:30). Billions and billions of them!

 

Likewise, although Jesus did not personally go among the wicked, He organized His work so it could go forward there, "even to all." Consider, however, Jesus' glorious welcome in paradise:

 

"While this vast multitude waited and conversed, rejoicing in the hour of their deliverance from the chains of death, the Son of God appeared, declaring liberty to the captives who had been faithful; . . .

 

"And the saints rejoiced in their redemption, and bowed the knee and acknowledged the Son of God as their Redeemer and Deliverer from death and the chains of hell.

 

"Their countenances shone, and the radiance from the presence of the Lord rested upon them, and they sang praises unto his holy name" (D&C 138:18, 23-24).

 

Therefore, an interesting constituency awaits us, such as those "who had died in their sins, without a knowledge of the truth" (D&C 138:32). This group is obviously very large!

 

None is to be left out, however, even those in the spirit prison who once "rejected the prophets" or who are there "because of their rebellion and transgression, that they through the ministration of his servants might also hear his words" (D&C 138:32, 37).

What are all individuals to hear and to be taught?

 

"These were taught faith in God, repentance from sin, vicarious baptism for the remission of sins, the gift of the Holy Ghost by the laying on of hands,

 

"And all other principles of the gospel that were necessary for them to know in order to qualify themselves that they might be judged according to men in the flesh, but live according to God in the spirit" (D&C 138:33-34).

 

Understandably emphasized is vicarious baptism for the dead, because that ordinance is absolutely essential for their cleansing and salvation. Furthermore, the recipients can thereby qualify to become members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints by developing sufficient faith and also by showing sufficient repentance in the spirit world.

 

Typically, in that connection, we here do not emphasize as much the other essential part of what can happen vicariously confirming Church membership and the bestowal of the great gift of the Holy Ghost. Because the accompanying and essential ordinances remain to be accomplished vicariously on our side of the veil, it would be well if more of the intensity characteristic of work in the spirit world were displayed by us in mortality. Indeed, the gifts of the Holy Ghost also help recipients there to lend a hand and to function more effectively in the spirit world after they are empowered by the vicariously given gift of the Holy Ghost!

 

President Brigham Young described further the spirit world:

"They do not pass out of the organization of this earth on which we live. . . . But where is the spirit world? It is incorporated within this celestial system."4

 

President Young also stated: "Is the spirit world here? It is not beyond the sun, but is on this earth that was organized for the people that have lived and that do and will live upon it. No other people can have it, and we can have no other kingdom until we are prepared to inhabit this eternally."5

 

The Prophet Joseph said: "When men are prepared, they are better off to go hence. . . . The spirits of the just are exalted to a greater and more glorious work; hence they are blessed in their departure to the world of spirits. Enveloped in flaming fire, they are not far from us, and know and understand our thoughts, feelings, and motions, and are often pained therewith."6

 

Brigham Young further observed as to the associational groupings there: "Yes, brethren, they are there together, and if they associate together, and collect together in clans and in societies as they do here, it is their privilege. No doubt they yet, more or less, see, hear, converse, and have to do with each other, both good and bad."7

 

Clearly, there are many other questions to which we do not have detailed answers. But, as has been set forth, we know considerable about the essential things: (1) the vastness of the work there, (2) its intensity, (3) its inclusiveness by sharing the gospel with all, (4) the orderliness with which the Lord carries out His work of mercy and justice in the spirit world, (5) the special status of those who are in paradise, (6) how those who may be emancipated from the spirit prison can then help to accomplish this work, and (7) the grouping together of people in what may have been some natural associations here that will persist there.

 

Sometimes in the Church we speak imprecisely at funerals and otherwise as if individuals who die go immediately to the celestial kingdom and are at once in the full presence of God. We tend to overlook the reality that the spirit world and paradise are part, really, of the second estate. The work of the Lord, so far as the second estate is concerned, is completed before the Judgment and the Resurrection.

 

Since those who go to the celestial kingdom include, as revealed, those who "overcome by faith" (D&C 76:53), the same efforts and triumph would need to occur in the spirit world before they receive resurrection and the entitlement to enter the celestial kingdom.

 

The veil of forgetfulness of the first estate apparently will not be suddenly, automatically, and totally removed at the time of our temporal death. This veil, a condition of our entire second estate, is associated with and is part of our time of mortal trial, testing, proving, and overcoming by faith and thus will continue in some key respects into the spirit world.

 

Yet, do people who have been wicked and agnostic, when they pass through the veil of death, suddenly and fully realize that there is, in spite of their earlier skepticism, life beyond the grave? Do they thus have an advantage over those who have had to develop faith in mortality concerning that prospect? If, for instance, the same attitudes with which we die persist, then there will be no automatic or immediate flip-flop into a totally different way of thinking. Such can occur there, just as it does here, upon our accepting the gospel and responding with both faith and repentance (Alma 34:34). Again, our existence in the spirit world is part of the mortal sector of our Father's plan which culminates with the Judgment and the Resurrection.

 

Surely those just and honorable mortals who have done so well here with the light they have received are the most likely to respond in paradise and the spirit world, when the fulness of the light of the gospel is given to them there. Consider the comments of the Prophet Joseph Smith about the important role of spiritual knowledge:

 

"Knowledge does away darkness, suspense and doubt, for where Knowledge is there is no doubt nor suspense nor darkness. There is no pain so awful as the pain of suspense. This is the condemnation of the wicked; their doubt and anxiety and suspense causes weeping, wailing and gnashing of teeth."8

 

The "pain of suspense" apparently will necessarily operate to some extent in the spirit prison because of uncertaintyalong with a price to be paid as part of repentance for transgressions. The Prophet Joseph also said:

 

"A man is his own tormentor and his own condemner. Hence the saying, They shall go into the lake that burns with fire and brimstone. The torment of disappointment in the mind of man is as exquisite as a lake burning with fire and brimstone. I say, so is the torment of man."9

 

The word prison carries with it the connotation of "a state of confinement," including a conceptual confinement. The Prophet Joseph Smith said, for instance, that God has "made ample provision for their redemption, according to their several circumstances . . . whether in this world, or in the world to come."10 Surely that declaration is emancipatory!

 

The Prophet also consoled: "God has administrators in the eternal world to release those spirits from Prison. The ordinances being administered by proxy upon them, the law is fulfilled."11

 

Likewise, the Prophet, when speaking of us and our chance to become "saviors . . . on Mount Zion," instructed as to how the merciful salvation for the dead "places the human family upon an equal footing, and harmonizes with every principle of righteousness, justice and truth."12

 

The Prophet Joseph declared that those who die in the faith in turn preach to those who have died "that they may live according to God in the Spirit and men do minister for them in the flesh and angels bear the glad tidings to the spirits and they are made happy by these means."13

 

Thus, we see from what is presently known concerning the work in the spirit world that its scope is enormous and its intensity real. Its justice and mercy reflect Heavenly Father's plan of salvation. But missionary work is work both here and there, though the latter proceeds on a much larger scale. We will surely have ample opportunities for service beyond the veil, when that time comes to each of us!

 

How marvelous it is that Heavenly Father gives to all full and generous recognition for all their good deeds and all their good qualities. Thus, we can all be judged justly out of the "book of life" (Revelation 20:12). Yet, God still requires of all obedience to His doctrines, ordinances, and covenants. Nicodemus, one of the best, was nevertheless told that no man shall enter the kingdom of heaven except he shall be born again (John 3:5). Jesus' baptism, and He was the Best, showed us His obedience and submissiveness to the Father with regard to that essential ordinance (2 Nephi 31:5-7). He, who might have been an exception, nevertheless pointed the way! The ordinances of salvation apply to all.

 

Thus, if not on this side of the veil, then in the spirit world to come, the gospel will be preached to all, including all transgressors, rebels, and rejectors of prophets, along with all those billions who died without a knowledge of the gospel (D&C 138).

 

The mercy of God will finally overpower justice for all. God gave agency to all. He extends His long-suffering to all, as He did in the days of Noah. He further reminds us, in the parable of the wheat and the tares, of the need for restraint and patience regarding the Second Coming (Matthew 13:29; D&C 38:12). To that very end, the Father determines the timing as to when the angels of heaven come down in judgment on the world.

 

He gave us our spirit birth, bringing the first estate to all. He gave the gift to us of mortality, or the second estate, where all might be "added upon," leaving one-third of the host free to be rebels! (Abraham 3:26; Revelation 12:4). He provides in the spirit world a continuum of mortality's probation, the great opportunity for all.

 

The specific desires of our individual hearts will finally and ultimately be granted to all. How can we complain? Because He is a loving Father, at Judgment Day, all those who have lived without God in the world will acknowledge that God is God and all will acknowledge that God is just!

 

"Oh how great [is] the plan of our God!" (2 Nephi 9:13).

 

But how little, really, we would know of that divine plan without the Prophet of the Restoration, Joseph Smith!

 

                                               

Notes

 

                                               

1. "Discourse," 1.

 

2. Discourses of Wilford Woodruff, 288-89.

 

3. Journal of Discourses, 4:135-36.

 

4. Journal of Discourses, 3:368.

 

5. Journal of Discourses, 3:372.

 

6. Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, 326.

 

7. Journal of Discourses, 2:137.

 

8. Ehat and Cook, Words of Joseph Smith, 183

.

9. History of the Church, 6:314.

 

10. Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, 220.

 

11. Ehat and Cook, Words of Joseph Smith, 372; punctuation standardized.

 

12. Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, 223.

 

13. Ehat and Cook, Words of Joseph Smith, 370; spelling and punctuation standardized.

 

 

(The Promise of Discipleship) Elder Neal A. Maxwell

 

 

Millennium

 

    1. Terrestrial mortals ( Live and die in a twinkling)
    2. Resurrected beings
      1. Celestial
      2. Terrestrial

 

 

Resurrection is a priesthood ordinance, keys are needed to perform.

 

Receiving ordinances will release them from Spirit Prison to move on to Paradise.

 

 

 

 

Malachi

December 14, 2006

 

 

 

Malachi = my messenger

 

Christ quoted the last 2 chapters to the Nephites so they had a record of his prophesies.

 

Moroni quoted these same chapters to Joseph Smith 4 times during his initial visits to Joseph.

 

He lived during the time of Nehemiah around 440-420 BC, during the intertestamental period.  The exiled community has returned and is struggling; they are disillusioned and question God’s love for them.  The also question their own righteousness; they aren’t keeping the Law of Moses as strictly as they should and are marrying outside of the covenant.

 

Chapters 3-4 = Prophesies for the latter days.

 

THE BOOK OF MALACHI

 

RICHARD D. DRAPER

 

To the Nephites and Lamanites the risen Savior quoted sections of the prophecies of Malachi, stating that the Father himself had commanded him to do so. The reason, he stated, was "that they should be given unto future generations" (3 Ne. 24:1; 26:2). Those generations were the righteous children of Lehi who established the perfect society after the coming of the Lord. fn Those people needed the words of Malachi in order to understand the new dimension which the work of the Lord took, now that he had fulfilled his mortal mission. Up to this time most of the preparation had been for his first coming. From that point on, it would be for his second. The words of Malachi reveal not only key events but also the nature of the work that would prepare for that coming. Therefore, the Savior used the words of Malachi as the basis on which he expounded "all things which should come upon the face of the earth, even until the elements should melt with fervent heat, and the earth should be wrapt together as a scroll, and the heavens and the earth should pass away" (3 Ne. 26:3).

 

Further emphasizing the importance of the writings of Malachi was the angel Moroni's use of them. When he instructed Joseph Smith during the night of 21-22 September 1823, he quoted portions of Malachi to introduce the extent and nature of the work which had to be accomplished before the Lord would come in glory. In doing so, he laid the foundation for the work in which the latter-day Church would be engaged. Thus, we see that Malachi's prophecies were necessary not only for the Nephites but for the Latter-day Saints as well. fn

 

The exact dates of Malachi's ministry are not known. From his written work it is clear that the temple had been rebuilt and the ordinances involving animal sacrifice were being performed. This places his ministry after 515 B.C., the year when the temple was dedicated. The abuses he castigated were the among those that the reforms of Ezra and Nehemiah were designed to correct. Because those reforms do not appear to have been in effect yet in Malachi's day, it is likely that his writings precede them. Therefore, his ministry would fall before 458 B.C., and was probably closer to 500 B.C. fn Malachi's name is unique in the Hebrew cannon. It means "my messenger," or "my angel," but it may be a shortened form of "the Lord's messenger." fn Although we know very little about him and his life's history, latter-day revelation makes it clear that he was an important individual who labored with Judah as one of her great prophets (D&C 138:46).

 

The Dishonor of Israel (Mal. 1-2)

 

One of the main problems faced by Malachi was the lack of faith the Jews felt toward Jehovah. This problem expressed itself in four specific ways: questioning the Lord's love, offering impure sacrifices, marrying outside the covenant, and lack of diligence in keeping the commandments. The prophet addressed each of these.

 

The Lord gave the Jews evidence of his love for them. Judah's cousins, the Edomites (descendants of Esau), were among her most bitter enemies. They had even assisted Judah's other enemies from time to time and had benefited greatly from Judah's fall in 587 B.C. by usurping part of her land. During the ministry of Zerubbabel, however, they had suffered a setback. Through Malachi, the Lord stated that this would actually prove their demise; they would never rise to power again. fn Their empty land would be proof of the Lord's care for Israel and would vouchsafe his right to demand their love and loyalty in return (Mal. 1:2-5).

 

In the meantime, Judah was not excused for doubting God's love nor profaning the sacrifices which she was hypocritically offering the Lord. Sick and blemished animals were used, against the Levitical law. And the priests, who should have guarded the rights of the Lord, not only turned a blind eye to these infractions but seem to have fostered them, probably out of self-interest (Mal. 1:6-14). All this was but a symptom of the real problem: a faithlessness by which "ye have corrupted [i.e., broken] the covenant" (Mal. 2:8). This last charge was leveled especially against the priests, whose duty it was to declare the law of God and guard his rights. In this they had failed and now stood in danger of bringing cursings upon the people. The Lord castigated the Levites for breaking the "covenant of Levi" their father—that is, dishonoring the priesthood with which the Lord had blessed their family. Their Aaronic Priesthood calling could have been a covenant of "life and peace" (Mal. 2:5). Because they dishonored it, however, the Lord would curse them and their work (Mal. 2:2-3, 8-9).

 

It appears that Israel in general had lost the privilege of eternal marriage at Sinai (D&C 84:23-27). But they had not forfeited the responsibility to marry within the covenant. Marriage to non-Israelites had proven to be the seedbed of apostasy; for this reason the Lord had forbidden it. fn In Malachi's day, the men of Judah and Levi had turned to foreign women and taken them as wives (Mal. 2:11, 13-15). Many had divorced their Israelite wives in order to accommodate their unrighteous desires. Malachi expressed well the Lord's hatred for this practice and its result: the rejection of all offerings made to him and the forfeiture of the consequent blessings (Mal. 2:12, 16-17).

 

The Coming Purification (Mal. 3:1-4)

 

The people had wearied the Lord with their claim that he delighted in evil because he had not come out against their enemies (Mal. 2:17). They ignored their own faithlessness and insisted that a good God would have done something to avenge them. Malachi warned them that the full vindication of the Lord's righteousness would be revealed in the Day of Judgment. But if the Jews expected the Day of Judgment to come in their own generation, they were very mistaken. Like so many Old Testament prophecies, Malachi's would take millennia to be fulfilled.

 

A key to understanding Malachi 3:1-4 is in identifying the messenger who would herald the day of judgment. fn The Savior identified John the Baptist as that messenger: "For this is he, of whom it is written, Behold, I send my messenger before thy face, which shall prepare thy way before thee" (Matt. 11:10). John's excellent service during the Lord's mortal ministry fulfilled the prophecy but only in part, because the context of the prophecy is with Jesus' second coming. John seems to have understood that his role would extend beyond his mortal ministry. When asked who he was, he stated, "I am the voice of one crying in the wilderness, Make straight the way of the Lord, as said the prophet Esaias" (John 1:23), referring to Isaiah 40:3. The context of Isaiah's words, like Malachi's, does not correspond with the events of the first coming of the Lord. They speak, rather, of the second, when "the glory of the Lord shall be revealed, and all flesh shall see it together" (Isa. 40:5). John would thus be the Lord's messenger twice, once to prepare the way for his first coming and then again for his second. The latter-day fulfillment was when John bestowed his powers upon Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery, allowing them and those whom they commissioned to be further messengers in preparing the way for the Lord. fn Perhaps the prophecy will be, or has been, fulfilled in other ways as well. fn

 

Malachi noted that two important events would yet transpire: the Lord would come to his temple (Mal. 3:1), and the sons of Levi would be purified and then make an acceptable offering before the Lord (Mal. 3:3).

 

The Lord came suddenly to his temple on 3 April 1836, as described in Doctrine and Covenants 110. fn His coming inaugurated the great latter-day work of the house of the Lord: "This is the beginning of the blessing which shall be poured out upon the heads of my people," he proclaimed (D&C 110:10). His appearance was followed by that of others, including Elijah, whose coming fulfilled another prophecy in Malachi (D&C 110:13-16; Mal. 4:5-6).

 

As seen in chapters 1 and 2, much of the message of Malachi concerns the unrighteousness of the Levites, who had violated the priesthood stewardship with which the Lord had blessed them and had brought their ministry under a curse (Mal. 2:2, 8). It is thus significant that a later son of Levi, John the Baptist, would be foretold in Malachi's record. John's ministry typified the lesser priesthood perfectly, since it would "prepare the way before" the greater ministry which was to come (Mal. 3:1).

 

But Malachi had more to say about the future of the sons of Levi. The Lord would yet purify them collectively and accept a righteous offering at their hand (Mal. 3:3-4). How will the sons of Levi be purified? In the same way that the sons of Ephraim, the sons of Lehi, and the Gentiles are purified: by forsaking their sins and the false traditions of their fathers, by accepting the gospel, and by being baptized into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. How will they "offer unto the Lord an offering in righteousness"? (Mal. 3:3). Joseph Smith, speaking concerning Malachi 3:3, taught that in order for "the restitution of all things" to be complete, the ordinance of animal sacrifice must be "fully restored." It "will be continued when the Priesthood is restored with all its authority, power and blessings." "Then shall the sons of Levi offer an acceptable offering to the Lord." This will take place, he said, "when the Temple of the Lord shall be built, and the sons of Levi be purified." fn The Prophet did not give further details concerning this ordinance, nor do the scriptures. But it is safe to conclude that it will be of sufficient duration to fulfill the prophecies and to signify that the sons of Levi acknowledge Jesus Christ as their Lord and are thus worthy again to be numbered among the covenant people. fn And it will be of sufficient quality and sincerity to lift from them the curse of which Malachi wrote (Mal. 2:1-3, 8), which they received when their offerings were unworthy of the Lord's approbation.

 

The Lord's Challenge (Mal. 3:5-18)

 

After showing how the offerings of the sons of Levi will become acceptable to the Lord in the last days, Malachi turned to the evil practices of his own day. He promised Judah that in spite of any future blessings, Jehovah would come against them in fury for the grievous sins they were then committing. Only if they would immediately return to him would they stave off destruction (Mal. 3:5-6).

 

To the question, "Wherein shall we return?" the Lord responded by specifying that they start by offering unto him tithes, which are his due (Lev. 27:30; Num. 18:21). As in every dispensation, this was a demand for faith. Judah was to quit trusting in her own arm and place her trust fully in the Lord. In a rare instance of challenge, the Lord demanded that the people test him in this matter, and he promised that blessings would flow from heaven in great abundance (Mal. 3:8-11). the result would be that even the Gentile nations would have to proclaim that Judah was blessed of God (Mal. 3:12).

 

"With Healing in His Wings" (Mal. 4)

 

Malachi again turned to the future day of judgment. He noted that it would be a day of distress, devastation, and sorrow for the wicked (Mal. 4:1). The major cause of the anguish would be that wickedness would no longer prevail. Indeed, the wicked will be consumed from off the face of the earth at the time of the Savior's great coming. fn But for the righteous, it will be a great day of deliverance and joy in which they will at last prevail against those who oppress them (Mal. 4:2-3).

 

But once again the prophet noted that the great day would be preceded by the coming of one sent from God (Mal. 4:5-6). This was to be Elijah. His mission would be twofold: first, to restore certain priesthood keys, and second, to plant in the hearts of the children the promises made to their forefathers, such that the hearts of the children would be drawn to their fathers. fn Elijah has already come to fulfill Malachi's words. He appeared in the Kirtland Temple on 3 April 1836 and conferred the keys of the sealing power upon Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery (D&C 110:13-16).

 

The keys which Elijah restored are most significant. They rounded out those already received so that the priesthood could then function in its fullness. fn One of the blessings that grew out of this power was eternal marriage and the resultant blessing of the sealing of children to parents. By extension, it also allowed generations to be linked together back over the course of the history of the earth. The blessings of the gospel and the sealing power are thus granted to those righteous people who were born during periods of apostasy. A byproduct of this process is that those on the earth are sealed to those in heaven and can draw assistance from them. fn

 

So important is this work that the whole purpose of the earth would be frustrated if it were not done. Modern revelation explains why. Each generation needs to be welded to the one before it, such that a whole, complete, and perfect union can be made. One of the first things necessary for that union is the organization of the righteous from every dispensation into one eternal family. In this way all the keys, powers, and glories from the days of Adam to the present are brought together to prepare the earth for the return of its great King (see D&C 128:18). In a very real way, the dead cannot be made perfect without their latter-day descendants doing the necessary temple work. Similarly, those living in the last days cannot receive all the power necessary for salvation until the links are fully complete. The fathers were promised that their posterity must save them in order to save themselves. As the children come to understand how dependent they are upon the fathers, their hearts turn to them. As the welding links are fully formed, the family of God is established and prepared for exaltation. In this way the earth fulfills its purpose.

 

The prophecies of Malachi show the responsibility that the prophets of the former day and the Saints of the latter day have in the work of the Lord. They testify to the dependence each generation of righteous people has on those who came before and those who will come after. But most of all, Malachi's words testify of the glorious work of God in the salvation of all his children.

 

Notes

 

Richard D. Draper is assistant professor of ancient scripture at Brigham Young University.

 

Footnotes

 

1. It is doubtful that the Lord was referring to any other people. For those living in the last days, the writings of Malachi have been preserved in the Bible. The essential purity of the biblical text of Malachi is attested in the Book of Mormon by Joseph Smith's translation of the Savior's quotations, which uses the same language as that in the KJV. It would seem, therefore, that the Savior intended his transmission of the text to be for the Nephites. The preservation of Malachi's text in two sets of scriptures, like that of Isaiah, underscores its importance.

 

2. For discussion, see Kent P. Jackson, "The Appearance of Moroni to Joseph Smith," in Studies in Scripture, Volume Two: The Pearl of Great Price, ed. Robert L. Millet and Kent P. Jackson (Salt Lake City: Randall Book, 1985), pp. 361-62.

 

3. For a discussion of the dating of the ministry of Malachi, see R. K. Harrison, Introduction to the Old Testament (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 1969), pp. 960-61.

 

4. For discussion, see D. Guthrie, The New Bible Commentary (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 1970), p. 806.

 

5. The Arabs were successful in taking over Edom by the fifth century and even began to mingle with those who had fled into southern Palestine. Eventually a new people, called the Nabateans, gained control of Edom. See Guthrie, p. 806.

 

6. Jehovah had specifically forbidden the practice for this very reason (see Ex. 34:15-16; Deut. 7:3-4), and the history of Israel had proved his wisdom (e.g., 1 Kgs. 11:1-11).

 

7. See the discussion by Jackson, "The Appearance of Moroni," pp. 348-50, and "Teaching from the Words of the Prophets," in Studies in Scripture, Volume Eight: Alma 30 to Moroni, ed. Kent P. Jackson (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1988), pp. 198-201.

 

8. JS-H 1:68-72; D&C 13. Of these commissioned messengers, none would be greater than Joseph Smith himself, who was the prophet of the Restoration and was specifically commissioned to prepare the way for the second coming of the Lord.

 

9. See Jackson, "Teaching from the Words of the Prophets," pp. 198-99.

 

10. See Joseph Fielding Smith, Doctrines of Salvation, 3 vols., comp. Bruce R. McConkie (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1954-56), 3:12-13. It is likely that the prophecy in Mal. 3:1 is not limited solely to that appearance. See Bruce R. McConkie, Mormon Doctrine, 2d ed. (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1966), pp. 693-94.

 

11. Joseph Smith, History of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 7 vols., 2d ed. rev., edited by B. H. Roberts (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1957), 4:211. See also Joseph Smith, Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, sel. Joseph Fielding Smith (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1938), pp. 172-73.

 

12. See Smith, Doctrines of Salvation, 3:93-94; McConkie, Mormon Doctrine, p. 666; Bruce R. McConkie, The Mortal Messiah, 4 vols. (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1979-81), 1:128. For another interpretation, see Sidney B. Sperry, The Voice of Israel's Prophets (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1952), pp. 438-39.

 

13. From the reading of this verse in JS-H 1:37, it appears that the wicked will be destroyed by the glory of those who come with Christ. This verse (Mal. 4:1) is referred to three times in the Doctrine and Covenants (29:9; 64:23; 133:64), which gives some indication of the importance of this event. See the discussion of Mal. 4:1-4 in Jackson, "The Appearance of Moroni," pp. 350-52.

 

14. This verse was significantly altered by Moroni so that Joseph Smith would fully understand the teaching of Malachi (JS-H 1:38-39). See the discussion by Jackson, "Teaching from the Words of the Prophets," pp. 202-3.

 

15. Joseph Smith taught that Elijah brought the power for revelation, ordinances, and endowments of the fulness of the Melchizedek Priesthood. See Smith, History of the Church, 6:250-51.

 

16. Ibid., 6:252.

 

 

(Kent P. Jackson, ed., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 4: 1 Kings to Malachi [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1993], 365.)

 

 

(Malachi 1:2-9.)

 

 The burden of the word of the LORD to Israel by Malachi.

 

2 I have loved you, saith the LORD. Yet ye say, Wherein hast thou loved us? Was not Esau Jacob's brother? saith the LORD: yet I loved Jacob,

 

3 And I hated Esau, and laid his mountains and his heritage waste for the dragons of the wilderness.

 

4 Whereas Edom saith, We are impoverished, but we will return and build the desolate places; thus saith the LORD of hosts, They shall build, but I will throw down; and they shall call them, The border of wickedness, and, The people against whom the LORD hath indignation for ever.

 

5 And your eyes shall see, and ye shall say, The LORD will be magnified from the border of Israel.

 

6 ¶ A son honoureth his father, and a servant his master: if then I be a father, where is mine honour? and if I be a master, where is my fear? saith the LORD of hosts unto you, O priests, that despise my name. And ye say, Wherein have we despised thy name?

 

7 Ye offer polluted bread upon mine altar; and ye say, Wherein have we polluted thee? In that ye say, The table of the LORD is contemptible.

 

8 And if ye offer the blind for sacrifice, is it not evil? and if ye offer the lame and sick, is it not evil? offer it now unto thy governor; will he be pleased with thee, or accept thy person? saith the LORD of hosts.

 

9 And now, I pray you, beseech God that he will be gracious unto us: this hath been by your means: will he regard your persons? saith the LORD of hosts.

 

 

Does God love His people?  He hates sin and wickedness; He hates that which is against His kingdom because it is a destroyer of His kingdom and His children. The examples of Esau and Edom breaking their covenants by marrying outside of the covenant and joining the Babylonians

 

The priests despised His name and offered polluted bread and sacrifices, they were blemished not pure, their intent and motives were wrong.

 

They honored son to father, servant to master, but didn’t honor God.  We honor God by building up His kingdom and doing His purposes.

 

You want God to be gracious when your motives are not pure, you aren’t doing your priesthood duties in a righteous way and the people notice your unrighteous example and you are pulling them down.  They are taking upon themselves the name of God in vain (treating holy things lightly).

 

(Malachi 2:1-10.)

 

1 And now, O ye priests, this commandment is for you.

 

2 If ye will not hear, and if ye will not lay it to heart, to give glory unto my name, saith the LORD of hosts, I will even send a curse upon you, and I will curse your blessings: yea, I have cursed them already, because ye do not lay it to heart.

 

3 Behold, I will corrupt your seed, and spread dung upon your faces, even the dung of your solemn feasts; and one shall take you away with it.

 

4 And ye shall know that I have sent this commandment unto you, that my covenant might be with Levi, saith the LORD of hosts.

 

5 My covenant was with him of life and peace; and I gave them to him for the fear wherewith he feared me, and was afraid before my name.

 

6 The law of truth was in his mouth, and iniquity was not found in his lips: he walked with me in peace and equity, and did turn many away from iniquity.

 

7 For the priest's lips should keep knowledge, and they should seek the law at his mouth: for he is the messenger of the LORD of hosts.

 

8 But ye are departed out of the way; ye have caused many to stumble at the law; ye have corrupted the covenant of Levi, saith the LORD of hosts.

 

9 Therefore have I also made you contemptible and base before all the people, according as ye have not kept my ways, but have been partial in the law.

 

10 Have we not all one father? hath not one God created us? why do we deal treacherously every man against his brother, by profaning the covenant of our fathers?

 

 

The priests are reproved for not keeping their covenants and teaching the people righteousness.  There isn’t unity between the priests, people and God.

 

God hates sin but He shows great love and patience for the people (Israel) in the Old Testament.

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 42:46-47.)

 

46 And it shall come to pass that those that die in me shall not taste of death, for it shall be sweet unto them;

 

47 And they that die not in me, wo unto them, for their death is bitter.

 

2nd Estate = Mortal life and Spirit world

 

Sweet = Paradise those who die in Christ

 

Bitter = Spirit Prison those who need time to refine and reform themselves, they need to accept the Atonement while dealing with the eternal consequences of their sins.

 

(Alma 36:12.)

 

12 But I was racked with eternal torment, for my soul was harrowed up to the greatest degree and racked with all my sins.

 

 

Alma was racked with eternal torment because of his sins.  He was experiencing the consequences of his actions.  He was going through a reformation – either turn to the Atonement or curse God.  He couldn’t escape the consequences and had to turn to God for help.  He was tormented for 3 days until he remembered his father’s teachings of Christ.

 

God is trying to save those in the Spirit World.  Much of our work there will be to help them accept Christ so they may receive various degrees of glory.

 

Verse 5 – There is peace and rest found in this life and paradise for those who honor and keep their covenants.

 

Priests should be honoring and teaching the Law to the people, they are called to be messengers of God.

 

Priesthood brings peace – Covenant keeping brings peace

 

Today do we accept 50% HT or VT? Or 50% tithing and think it’s OK?  By not doing our callings in the correct manner means our hearts are not right with God.

 

(Malachi 2:14-17.)

 

14 ¶ Yet ye say, Wherefore? Because the LORD hath been witness between thee and the wife of thy youth, against whom thou hast dealt treacherously: yet is she thy companion, and the wife of thy covenant.

 

15 And did not he make one? Yet had he the residue of the spirit. And wherefore one? That he might seek a godly seed. Therefore take heed to your spirit, and let none deal treacherously against the wife of his youth.

 

16 For the LORD, the God of Israel, saith that he hateth putting away: for one covereth violence with his garment, saith the LORD of hosts: therefore take heed to your spirit, that ye deal not treacherously.

 

17 ¶ Ye have wearied the LORD with your words. Yet ye say, Wherein have we wearied him? When ye say, Every one that doeth evil is good in the sight of the LORD, and he delighteth in them; or, Where is the God of judgment?

 

The priests were divorcing their wives in the covenant and marrying younger women outside of the covenant for lustful reasons, God hates their actions.

 

The priests were not living appropriately either religiously or personally.

 

Malachi 3 – Quoted to the Nephites and to Joseph Smith, it has multiple fulfillments, deep doctrines.

 

(Malachi 3:1-11.)

 

 Behold, I will send my messenger, and he shall prepare the way before me: and the Lord, whom ye seek, shall suddenly come to his temple, even the messenger of the covenant, whom ye delight in: behold, he shall come, saith the LORD of hosts.

 

2 But who may abide the day of his coming? and who shall stand when he appeareth? for he is like a refiner's fire, and like fullers' soap:

 

3 And he shall sit as a refiner and purifier of silver: and he shall purify the sons of Levi, and purge them as gold and silver, that they may offer unto the LORD an offering in righteousness.

 

4 Then shall the offering of Judah and Jerusalem be pleasant unto the LORD, as in the days of old, and as in former years.

 

5 And I will come near to you to judgment; and I will be a swift witness against the sorcerers, and against the adulterers, and against false swearers, and against those that oppress the hireling in his wages, the widow, and the fatherless, and that turn aside the stranger from his right, and fear not me, saith the LORD of hosts.

 

6 For I am the LORD, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed.

 

7 ¶ Even from the days of your fathers ye are gone away from mine ordinances, and have not kept them. Return unto me, and I will return unto you, saith the LORD of hosts. But ye said, Wherein shall we return?

 

8 ¶ Will a man rob God? Yet ye have robbed me. But ye say, Wherein have we robbed thee? In tithes and offerings.

 

9 Ye are cursed with a curse: for ye have robbed me, even this whole nation.

 

10 Bring ye all the tithes into the storehouse, that there may be meat in mine house, and prove me now herewith, saith the LORD of hosts, if I will not open you the windows of heaven, and pour you out a blessing, that there shall not be room enough to receive it.

 

11 And I will rebuke the devourer for your sakes, and he shall not destroy the fruits of your ground; neither shall your vine cast her fruit before the time in the field, saith the LORD of hosts.

 

 

Messenger: Prepare the way

 

    1. John the Baptist - 1st coming of Christ
    2. Joseph Smith – Christ coming to His temple, April 3, 1836
    3. Christ – 2nd coming to His earth
    4. Church – to prepare the people throughout the world for 2nd coming and Millennium

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 101:22-23.) – Church is the messenger to prepare the way for Christ’s coming

 

22 Behold, it is my will, that all they who call on my name, and worship me according to mine everlasting gospel, should gather together, and stand in holy places;

 

23 And prepare for the revelation which is to come, when the veil of the covering of my temple, in my tabernacle, which hideth the earth, shall be taken off, and all flesh shall see me together.

 

 

This chapter refers to the 2nd coming, the refiner’s fire for cleansing, the role of the Sons of Levi (which has a wider interpretation then just the Aaronic priesthood), tithing etc. . . .

 

3 Nephi 24 and 25 (Compare Malachi 3 and 4)

 

Having taught from the book of Isaiah and given encouragement to search all the prophets, Christ quoted in full Malachi 3 and 4 with their emphasis on the message and messenger "of the covenant." Of those passages from Malachi—obviously not available to Lehi at the time he left Jerusalem—Christ said, "These scriptures, which ye had not with you, the Father commanded that I should give unto you; for it was wisdom in him that they should be given unto future generations." fn

 

Those chapters are particularly important to Latter-day Saints in light of the fact that when the angel Moroni first appeared to the Prophet Joseph Smith on September 21, 1823, "he commenced quoting the prophecies of the Old Testament. He first quoted part of the third chapter of Malachi; and he quoted also the fourth or last chapter of the same prophecy, though with a little variation from the way it reads in our Bibles." fn

 

The Prophet did not identify all of the verses Moroni quoted from Malachi 3, but we may safely assume that those verses would have included the ones that deal with the second coming of the Savior.

 

"Behold, I will send my messenger, and he shall prepare the way before me: and the Lord, whom ye seek, shall suddenly come to his temple, even the messenger of the covenant, whom ye delight in."61 The most obvious messenger to come preparing the way before the Lord was John the Baptist. Not only did John serve as a forerunner to the Lord in New Testament times, but he has also played that role in these latter days. On May 15, 1829, he appeared to Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery and restored the Aaronic Priesthood in preparation for greater priesthood powers to follow, including the keys and ordinances of the holy temple and the Savior's appearance there. In a moment of great spiritual manifestation when many keys and dispensational powers were returned to the earth, Christ, who is the great "messenger of the covenant," did come to the first temple in this dispensation, in Kirtland, Ohio, on April 3, 1836. fn He has, of course, come to other temples and will yet do so—particularly in Jerusalem and Jackson County, Missouri—as part of the culmination of his majestic second coming.

 

"Who may abide the day of his coming? and who shall stand when he appeareth? for he is like a refiner's fire, and like fullers' soap: And he shall sit as a refiner and purifier of silver: and he shall purify the sons of Levi, . . . that they may offer unto the Lord an offering in righteousness." fn The Savior's return will be a cleansing, refining experience by fire. The righteous will endure and be purified by this flame of truth, while the wicked will be burned as stubble, unable to withstand its unquenchable demands. In that millennial moment, the sons of Levi (the tribe of Israel having a birthright to the ministry of the Aaronic Priesthood) will be purified and restored to their ancient duties.

 

One of their "offerings," as taught by the Prophet Joseph Smith, is a book of remembrance, to be presented to the Lord "in his holy temple, . . . a book containing the records of our dead, which shall be worthy of all acceptation." fn The Prophet also taught that these Levitical duties would include blood [animal] sacrifice as "an offering in righteousness" to the Lord in the temple of the New Jerusalem, perhaps as part of a final exercise in which the various elements and ordinances of all earlier dispensations will be brought together, at least symbolically, in this triumphant, concluding moment of the dispensation of the fulness of times in which the completion of this world and its work is presented to its rightful Lord of lords and King of kings. fn

 

 

(Jeffrey R. Holland, Christ and the New Covenant: The Messianic Message of the Book of Mormon [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1997], 293.)

 

 

This lesson is not intended as a treatise on the Aaronic Priesthood, but is intended to present a general outline of the history of the Aaronic Priesthood, the duties of the priests and Levites of this order in ancient times, and the reason for the bestowal of that Priesthood in this dispensation. The Prophet writes: "We (Oliver Cowdery and himself) continued the work of translation, when ,in the ensuing month (May, 1829), we, on a certain day went into the woods to pray and inquire of the Lord respecting baptism for the remission of sins, that we found mentioned in the translation of the plates. While we were thus employed, praying and calling upon the Lord, a messenger from heaven descended in a cloud of light, and having laid his hands upon us, he ordained us saying:

 

Upon you my fellow servants, in the name of Messiah, I confer the Priesthood of Aaron, which holds the keys of the ministering of angels, and of the Gospel of repentance, and of baptism by immersion for the remission of sins; and this shall never be taken again from the earth, until the sons of Levi do offer again an offering unto the Lord in righteousness. (D. and C. sec. 13.)

 

He said that the Aaronic Priesthood had not the power of laying on hands for the gift of the Holy Ghost, but that this should be conferred on us hereafter; and he commanded us to go and be baptized, and gave us directions that I should baptize Oliver Cowdery, and afterwards that he should baptize me. Accordingly we went and were baptized. I baptized him first, and afterwards he baptized me, after which I laid my hands upon his head and ordained him to the Aaronic Priesthood, and afterwards he laid his hands on me and ordained me to the same Priesthood—for so we were commanded.

 

The messenger who visited us on this occasion, and conferred the Priesthood upon us, said that his name was John, the same that is called John the Baptist in the New Testament, and that he acted under the direction of Peter, James and John, who held the keys of the Priesthood of Melchizedek, which Priesthood he said would in due time be conferred on us, and that I should be called the first Elder of the Church, and he (Oliver Cowdery) the second. It was on the 15th day of May, 1829, that we were ordained under the hand of this messenger, and baptized." D. H. C. Vol. 1:39-41.

 

In his account the Prophet declared that the angel ordained him and Oliver Cowdery. The proper word would have been conferred the Priesthood. In the early days of the Church the term "ordain" was used in the sense of conferring or setting apart. The distinction which we make today between conferring, setting apart and ordaining, had not been clearly drawn. The Angel John, however, used the proper expression. Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery, as the record shows, were not ordained to any office, but the Priesthood was conferred upon them. All of the offices of the Priesthood come out of, and are appendages to, the Priesthood. (See D. and C. 107:5.) Priesthood has existed independently of the Church at times, but the offices pertain to the Church organization and are conferred by the sanction of the Church. This is also true of the bestowal of the Melchizedek Priesthood. Under the hands of Peter, James and John, Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery had conferred upon them the Melchizedek Priesthood and all of the offices come out of this Priesthood after the organization of the Church. The first office held in this dispensation was that of Elder. Joseph Smith was ordained by Oliver Cowdery to be the first Elder of the Church, and Oliver Cowdery was ordained to be the second Elder of the Church, on the 6th day of April, 1830. Following this ordination, as the Church increased in membership deacons, teachers, and priests were ordained, also other elders. On the third day of June, 1832, the first high priests were ordained. Among this number was Joseph Smith the Prophet. He was ordained at his request to the office of high priest, under the hands of Lyman Wight who had been previously ordained to that office by Joseph Smith the Prophet. Oliver Cowdery who was absent at the time of this conference was ordained a high priest, August 28, 1831, "by the voice of the Church and the command of God." (See "Essentials in Church History," pp. 126-127.)

 

John the Baptist informed Joseph and Oliver that the Aaronic Priesthood, "had not the power of laying on hands for the gift of the Holy Ghost, but that this should be conferred on us hereafter." (D. H. C. Vol. 1:39.) In the conferring of this Priesthood the messenger also said: "* * * and this shall never be taken again from the earth, until the sons of Levi do offer again an offering unto the Lord in righteousness." This saying has led to some speculation and needless discussion. We may be sure that the Aaronic Priesthood will never be taken from the earth while mortality endures, for there will always be need for temporal direction and the performance of ordinances pertaining to "the preparatory Gospel." Oliver Cowdery writing in the early day of the Church of the glorious vision has given us a little different version of this restoration, as follows:

 

"On a sudden, as from the midst of eternity, the voice of the Redeemer spake to us while the veil was parted and the angel of God came down clothed with glory, and delivered the anxiously looked-for message, and the Keys of the Gospel of repentance! What joy! what wonder! what amazement! While the world was racked and distracted—while millions were groping as the blind for the wall, and while men were resting upon uncertainty, as a general mass, our eyes beheld, our ears heard. As in the blaze of day; yes, more—above the glitter of the May sunbeam, which then shed its brilliancy over the face of nature! Then the voice, though mild, pierced to the center, and his words, "I am thy fellow servant," dispelled every fear. We listened, we gazed, we admired! 'Twas the voice of an angel from glory. 'Twas a message from the Most High! and as we heard we rejoiced while his love enkindled our souls, and we were wrapt in the vision of the Almighty. Where was room for doubt? Nowhere, uncertainty had fled, doubt had sunk, no more to rise, while fiction and deception had fled forever!

 

"But dear brother, think, further think for a moment, what joy filled our hearts, and with surprise we must have bowed (for who should not have bowed the knee for such a blessing!) when we received under his hands the Holy Priesthood as he said, 'Upon you my fellow-servants, in the name of Messiah, I confer this Priesthood and this authority, which shall remain upon earth that the sons of Levi may yet offer an offering unto the Lord in righteousness." (Messenger and Advocate, p.16.)

 

There can be little question about the meaning of the words of the angel. The Priesthood was to remain that the sons of Levi may offer an offering in righteousness.

 

 

(Joseph Fielding Smith, Church History and Modern Revelation, 4 vols. [Salt Lake City: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 1946-1949], 1: 55.)

 

 

D&C 84 – September 1832

 

Temple to be built in Jackson County

 

Sons of Moses – Melchizedek priesthood

Sons of Aaron – Deacons and Teachers – Levitical priesthood, Priests Aaronic priesthood

 

The Oath and Covenant of the Priesthood (vv. 33-44) – Robert Millett

 

Bearing the Holy Priesthood is a sacred obligation, a trust that must not be taken lightly. From the beginning of time the Lord has bestowed the rights of priesthood upon his worthy sons, and at the same time he has counseled that the priesthood—like a double-edged sword—is the instrument for blessing as well as cursing. The worthy and pure recipient qualifies himself and his family for transcendent blessings; the man who receives God's authority and then proves unwilling to assume the consequent commitments lays the foundation for unhappiness and punishment. God will not be mocked! God swore to Enoch of old and to his children

 

With an oath by himself; that every one being ordained after this order [the Holy Priesthood after the Order of the Son of God] and calling should have power, by faith, to break mountains, to divide the seas, to dry up waters, to turn them out of their course; to put at defiance the armies of nations, to divide the earth, to break every band, to stand in the presence of God; to do all things according to his will, according to his command, subdue principalities and powers; and this by the will of the Son of God which was from before the foundation of the world. And men having this faith, coming up unto this order of God, were translated and taken up into heaven (JST, Gen. 14:30-32).

 

The above passage makes abundantly clear that the priesthood is the power over the elements, power over men and demons—in short, power over life and death.

 

In section 84 of the Doctrine and Covenants the Lord reveals anew the terms and conditions pertaining to the reception and utilization of the powers of the Melchizedek Priesthood. The Oath which accompanies the reception of the priesthood is an oath that God swears to man. Just as the Father swore that the Beloved Son should be a priest forever (Ps. 110:4), so also does God swear with an oath that every priesthood holder who abides by his part of the two-way promise (the covenant) shall receive incomprehensible blessings. fn The Covenant which accompanies the reception of the Melchizedek Priesthood (there is no oath associated with the Aaronic Priesthood fn) consists of: (1) those things man promises to do; and (2) those blessings God promises the faithful priesthood bearer. As given in verses 33-44, the Covenant might be represented as follows:

 

MAN PROMISES

 

1. Obtain the Priesthood (v. 33)

 

2. Magnify Callings in the Priesthood (v. 33)

 

3. Receive the Lord's Servants (v. 36)

 

4. Beware Concerning Himself (v. 43)

 

5. Give Diligent Heed to the Words of Eternal Life (v. 43)

 

6. Live by Every Word of God (v. 44)

 

GOD PROMISES

 

1. Sanctify Man to the Renewal of the Body (v. 33)

 

2. Man to Become a Son of Moses and Aaron (v. 34)

 

3. Man to Become the Seed of Abraham (v. 34)

 

4. Man to Become a Part of the Church and Kingdom of God (v. 34)

 

5. Man to Become the Elect of God (v. 34)

 

6. Man to Receive Christ and the Father (vv. 36-37)

 

7. Man to Receive All the Father Has (v. 38)

 

Man's promises to God are penetrating but quite straight-forward. Faithful observance of those promises leads to remarkable blessings. Alma taught the people of Ammonihah that righteous priesthood bearers of the past had magnified their callings to such an extent that they "were sanctified, and their garments were washed white through the blood of the Lamb. Now they, after being sanctified by the Holy Ghost, having their garments made white, being pure and spotless before God, could not look upon sin save it were with abhorrence; and there were many, exceedingly great many, who were made pure and entered into the rest of the Lord their God" (Alma 13:11-12). Faithful priesthood service thus leads to the purification of the soul.

 

Moses and Aaron were great priesthood figures in their day. Since the priesthoods of Moses and Aaron (Melchizedek and Aaronic, respectively) bless the lives of men everywhere, it is a simple fact that "faithful holders of the Melchizedek Priesthood, no matter what their natural lineage, become by adoption the sons of Moses and Aaron." fn One writer has described this principle of adoption as follows: "Now, the literal descendants of Moses and Aaron are Levites. But the Lord was not talking about their lineal descendants. . . . In truth, all who will have received both the Aaronic and Melchizedek Priesthoods, who will have magnified their callings in these two priesthoods, will, by adoption, 'become the sons of Moses and of Aaron and the seed of Abraham, and the church and kingdom and the elect of God."' fn Worthy priesthood holders are not "adopted" in a legalistic sense into the families of Moses and Aaron. Rather, it is as though they are worthy of being counted as followers—persons who live after the same fashion—of Moses and Aaron. They are worthy of being counted among the noble. Further, those who join the Church, receive the priesthood, and prove faithful to that priesthood are entitled to the name and blessings of Father Abraham—the blessings of the Fathers, foremost of which is eternal life and thus the continuation of the family unit in eternity. fn

 

Faithfully enduring to the end in the work of the priesthood eventuates in receiving the promise of eternal life, either here or hereafter. Having arrived at this station, one is appropriately classified as the elect of God, having made his calling and election sure unto eternal life. Having read verse 34 in section 84 (regarding becoming "the church and kingdom, and the elect of God"), President Marion G. Romney said to the men of the priesthood in 1974: "We talk about making our callings and elections sure. The only way we can do this is to get the priesthood and magnify it." fn It appears that to become "the church and kingdom of God" is to be entitled to membership in the Church of the Firstborn, the Church of the exalted. In referring to verse 34 (the "church and kingdom of God") President Harold B. Lee taught that such worthy persons "become adopted into the holy family, the church and kingdom of God, the church of the firstborn." fn "When [a man] has proved himself by a worthy life, having been faithful in all things required of him," wrote Joseph Fielding Smith, "then it is his privilege to receive other covenants and to take upon himself other obligations which will make of him an heir, and he will become a member of the 'Church of the Firstborn.' Into his hands 'the Father has given all things.' He will be a priest and a king, receiving of the Father's fulness and of his glory. . . . And the fulness of these blessings can only be obtained in the temple of the Lord." fn

 

All men who receive the Melchizedek Priesthood thus enter into covenant with God. The penalties associated with breaking the covenant are sobering. "Whoso breaketh this covenant after he hath received it, and altogether turneth therefrom, shall not have forgiveness of sins in this world nor in the world to come" (D&C 84:41). Though the language of the above statement is somber, the Lord is not declaring that those who fail to keep the covenant are guilty of the unpardonable sin. Rather, he is teaching that those who receive the priesthood in this life but do not so live as to reap its privileges and blessings on earth, shall not have the right to priesthood hereafter; they forfeit the right to eternal life and eternal associations. fn

 

President Wilford Woodruff expressed the power and profundity of the promises given to the faithful priesthood holder in these words: "Who in the name of the Lord can apprehend such language as this? Who can comprehend that, by obeying the celestial law, all that our Father has shall be given unto us—exaltations, thrones, principalities, power, dominion—who can comprehend it? Nevertheless it is here stated." fn

 

 

(Robert L. Millet and Kent P. Jackson, eds., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 1: The Doctrine and Covenants [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1989], 316.)

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 84:31.) – All priesthood will give an acceptable offering and shall receive all that the Father has.

 

31 Therefore, as I said concerning the sons of Moses—for the sons of Moses and also the sons of Aaron shall offer an acceptable offering and sacrifice in the house of the Lord, which house shall be built unto the Lord in this generation, upon the consecrated spot as I have appointed—

 

 

The sons of Moses have a right "to the Holy Priesthood," "which priesthood continueth in the church of God in all generations, and is without beginning of days or end of years." (D&C 84:6, 17.) Moses sought diligently to prepare his people for this right to be worthy of the presence of God through the authority, ordinances, and power of the priesthood. (D&C 84:19-23.) The sons of Moses today hearken to the one called of God to guide them in their preparation to behold His presence.

 

Aaron was a spokesman for Moses and an assistant to him, Moses having the greater calling and Aaron the lesser. The lesser, or preparatory, priesthood was named after Aaron. (D&C 84:18, 26-27.) The sons of Aaron today are those who accept the preparatory, or Aaronic, Priesthood and live its principles, thus proving worthy of greater blessings as they enter the Order of the Melchizedek Priesthood. They learn to accept all who are called as spokesmen (those other local and general authorities who help accomplish the Lord's work) under the direction of the prophet. They are also willing themselves to serve as spokesmen in priesthood capacities when called to do so.

 

Thus, the sons of Moses and of Aaron today are faithful priesthood holders. In the course of their progress, they will become worthy temple recommend holders. They will "offer an acceptable offering and sacrifice in the house of the Lord" (D&C 84:31) by receiving their own temple endowment and performing work for the dead. "And the sons of Moses and of Aaron shall be filled with the glory of the Lord, upon Mount Zion in the Lord's house, whose sons are ye; and also many whom I have called and sent forth to build up my church." (D&C 84:32.)

 

The mention of the temple is most significant, for it is through the ordinances of the Lord's house that we prepare to achieve the goal sought by Moses for his people: to enter the Lord's presence. Elder McConkie noted that "the greatest blessings are reserved for those who obtain 'the fulness of the priesthood,' meaning the fullness of the blessings of the priesthood. These blessings are found only in the temples of God." fn The oath and covenant of the priesthood includes all of the covenants made in the temple.

 

In similitude to the mission of Moses to gather Israel and establish them as a people, the Lord revealed a latter-day mission of the "sons of Moses:" "Yea, the word of the Lord concerning his church, established in the last days for the restoration of his people, as he has spoken by the mouth of his prophets, and for the gathering of his saints." (D&C 84:2.) The corollary between the mission of Moses in ancient Israel and the mission of the sons of Moses in modern Israel is not coincidental.

 

Doctrine and Covenants 84:34 specifies that "they become . . . the seed of Abraham." The literal house of Israel all descended from Abraham, but as Paul explained, "they are not all Israel, which are of Israel: Neither, because they are all children of Abraham, are they the seed. . . . but the children of the promise are counted for the seed." (JST Romans 9:6-8.) In other words, faithfulness to the principles the patriarch taught (the gospel) determines heirship and acceptance—literal descent is not enough. Abraham became a model for all Saints, eventually achieving godhood. (See D&C 132:37.) The blessings of the gospel are often referred to in connection with the Abrahamic covenant, which is, as explained by Elder McConkie, "that Abraham and his seed (including those adopted into his family) shall have all of the blessings of the gospel, of the priesthood, and of eternal life," fn including eternal increase. The Lord revealed that "this promise is yours also, because ye are of Abraham" and that we should "go . . . therefore, and do the works of Abraham." (D&C 132:31-32.)

 

Elder McConkie noted that "what we say for Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob we say also for Sarah, Rebekah, and Rachel, the wives . . . who with them were true and faithful in all things," fn for, as President Joseph Fielding Smith taught, "the Lord offers to his daughters every spiritual gift and blessing that can be obtained by his sons." fn

 

In order to enjoy the full blessings of the oath and covenant of the priesthood, a man must marry for time and eternity in the house of the Lord. (See D&C 131:1-3.) Elder McConkie explained that "this covenant, made when the priesthood is received, is renewed when the recipient enters the order of eternal marriage." fn Further, "when he is married in the temple for time and for all eternity, each worthy member of the Church enters personally into the same covenant the Lord made with Abraham. This is the occasion when the promises of eternal increase are made, and it is then specified that those who keep the covenants made there shall be inheritors of all the blessings of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob." fn

 

(Susan Easton Black et al., Doctrines for Exaltation: The 1989 Sperry Symposium on the Doctrine and Covenants [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1989], 44 - 45.)

 

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 128:24.) – we should do all we can in righteousness

 

24 Behold, the great day of the Lord is at hand; and who can abide the day of his coming, and who can stand when he appeareth? For he is like a refiner's fire, and like fuller's soap; and he shall sit as a refiner and purifier of silver, and he shall purify the sons of Levi, and purge them as gold and silver, that they may offer unto the Lord an offering in righteousness. Let us, therefore, as a church and a people, and as Latter-day Saints, offer unto the Lord an offering in righteousness; and let us present in his holy temple, when it is finished, a book containing the records of our dead, which shall be worthy of all acceptation.

Malachi 3:4 – Both kingdoms are doing Christ’s work to prepare for the 2nd coming and the Millennium.

 

Malachi 3:8 – Another problem was the payment of tithes and offerings.  We should prove God and He will “pour out” blessings upon us.  The temple endowment is part of this blessing.  This verse means more then just paying tithes and offerings; it also means the consecration of the people.

 

Bruce gave several scriptures on escaping our enemies and being endowed from on high.

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 37:1.) – Go to Ohio to escape your enemies and for your sakes

 

1 Behold, I say unto you that it is not expedient in me that ye should translate any more until ye shall go to the Ohio, and this because of the enemy and for your sakes.

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 38:31.) – Escape and be endowed from on high

 

31 And that ye might escape the power of the enemy, and be gathered unto me a righteous people, without spot and blameless—

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 39:15.) – Blessings poured forth, tithing and consecration of the people

 

15 And inasmuch as my people shall assemble themselves at the Ohio, I have kept in store a blessing such as is not known among the children of men, and it shall be poured forth upon their heads. And from thence men shall go forth into all nations.

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 97:10-17.) – Temple built on tithing and sacrifice, for the salvation of Zion and to the pure in heart

 

10 Verily I say unto you, that it is my will that a house should be built unto me in the land of Zion, like unto the pattern which I have given you.

 

11 Yea, let it be built speedily, by the tithing of my people.

 

12 Behold, this is the tithing and the sacrifice which I, the Lord, require at their hands, that there may be a house built unto me for the salvation of Zion

 

13 For a place of thanksgiving for all saints, and for a place of instruction for all those who are called to the work of the ministry in all their several callings and offices;

 

14 That they may be perfected in the understanding of their ministry, in theory, in principle, and in doctrine, in all things pertaining to the kingdom of God on the earth, the keys of which kingdom have been conferred upon you.

 

15 And inasmuch as my people build a house unto me in the name of the Lord, and do not suffer any unclean thing to come into it, that it be not defiled, my glory shall rest upon it;

 

16 Yea, and my presence shall be there, for I will come into it, and all the pure in heart that shall come into it shall see God.

 

17 But if it be defiled I will not come into it, and my glory shall not be there; for I will not come into unholy temples.

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 105:4.) – Can’t redeem Zion until it is united and obedient

 

4 And are not united according to the union required by the law of the celestial kingdom;

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 105:9-10.) – Wait; prepare to be taught to know their duty.  Elders need to be endowed from on high

 

9 Therefore, in consequence of the transgressions of my people, it is expedient in me that mine elders should wait for a little season for the redemption of Zion

 

10 That they themselves may be prepared, and that my people may be taught more perfectly, and have experience, and know more perfectly concerning their duty, and the things which I require at their hands.

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 109:21, 36) – Gift of tongues poured out (Gift of the Holy Ghost)

 

21 And when thy people transgress, any of them, they may speedily repent and return unto thee, and find favor in thy sight, and be restored to the blessings which thou hast ordained to be poured out upon those who shall reverence thee in thy house.

 

36 Let it be fulfilled upon them, as upon those on the day of Pentecost; let the gift of tongues be poured out upon thy people, even cloven tongues as of fire, and the interpretation thereof.

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 110:7-10.) – Christ will come to His temple if it isn’t polluted, great blessing to be poured out

 

7 For behold, I have accepted this house, and my name shall be here; and I will manifest myself to my people in mercy in this house.

 

8 Yea, I will appear unto my servants, and speak unto them with mine own voice, if my people will keep my commandments, and do not pollute this holy house.

 

9 Yea the hearts of thousands and tens of thousands shall greatly rejoice in consequence of the blessings which shall be poured out, and the endowment with which my servants have been endowed in this house.

 

10 And the fame of this house shall spread to foreign lands; and this is the beginning of the blessing which shall be poured out upon the heads of my people. Even so. Amen.

 

Christ will destroy the wicked both root and branch.  Those that fear God (Christ) will receive healing from the Atonement.  They are to keep the Law of Moses until they are commanded not too.  Elijah will come in the future and bring the keys of the higher law he holds the keys of the kingdom including temple keys and our calling and election being made sure.

 

(Malachi 4:1-6.)

 

1 For, behold, the day cometh, that shall burn as an oven; and all the proud, yea, and all that do wickedly, shall be stubble: and the day that cometh shall burn them up, saith the LORD of hosts, that it shall leave them neither root nor branch.

 

2 ¶ But unto you that fear my name shall the Sun of righteousness arise with healing in his wings; and ye shall go forth, and grow up as calves of the stall.

 

3 And ye shall tread down the wicked; for they shall be ashes under the soles of your feet in the day that I shall do this, saith the LORD of hosts.

 

4 ¶ Remember ye the law of Moses my servant, which I commanded unto him in Horeb for all Israel, with the statutes and judgments.

 

5 ¶ Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the LORD:

 

6 And he shall turn the heart of the fathers to the children, and the heart of the children to their fathers, lest I come and smite the earth with a curse.

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 2:1-3.) – Priesthood by the hands of Elijah, everything before is only preparatory to this

 

1 Behold, I will reveal unto you the Priesthood, by the hand of Elijah the prophet, before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the Lord.

 

2 And he shall plant in the hearts of the children the promises made to the fathers, and the hearts of the children shall turn to their fathers.

 

3 If it were not so, the whole earth would be utterly wasted at his coming.

 

 

Fulness of the Priesthood

 

 

Aaronic Priesthood                                 Patriarchal Priesthood                   Melchizedek Priesthood

 

                                                            Holy Ghost                                    Calling and Election Sure

                                                            Washing and Anointing                   Comes from Elijah

                                                            Endowment

                                                            Eternal marriage

                                                            Abrahamic covenant

                                                            (Our family line)

 

Malachi 4:4-5 – Elijah will bring the fulness back

Matthew 14-18

 The Fourth Narrative and Discourse

February 22, 2007

 

 

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 10:52-54.) – The Church is not to destroy what people have received but to build up what they already have.

 

52 And now, behold, according to their faith in their prayers will I bring this part of my gospel to the knowledge of my people. Behold, I do not bring it to destroy that which they have received, but to build it up.

 

53 And for this cause have I said: If this generation harden not their hearts, I will establish my church among them.

 

54 Now I do not say this to destroy my church, but I say this to build up my church;

 

The Church brings people up to a higher level with priesthood keys and ordinances.  True Christians are better than no religion or secularists.

 

(3 Nephi 15:7.)

 

7 And because I said unto you that old things have passed away, I do not destroy that which hath been spoken concerning things which are to come.

 

(Matthew 10:1.) – The 12 had priesthood authority but no keys.  Keys are the right to direct priesthood authority.

 

1 And when he had called unto him his twelve disciples, he gave them power against unclean spirits, to cast them out, and to heal all manner of sickness and all manner of disease.

 

 

(Matthew 16:19.)

 

19 And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.

 

 

Jesus tells Peter that he will be given the keys of the kingdom, to direct and regulate the affairs of the kingdom here on earth.  Saving priesthood ordinances come from those having keys.  Christ has all of the keys but He did not give them to the 12, He had others confer the keys on the 12.

 

The events on the Mount of Transfiguration

 

(Matthew 17:1-8.) – Moses and Elijah returned the keys of the kingdom, but not all of the keys.  Physical bodies were needed to confer the keys by the laying on of hands, so Moses and Elijah were translated for this purpose.

 

1 And after six days Jesus taketh Peter, James, and John his brother, and bringeth them up into an high mountain apart,

 

2 And was transfigured before them: and his face did shine as the sun, and his raiment was white as the light.

 

3 And, behold, there appeared unto them Moses and Elias talking with him.

 

4 Then answered Peter, and said unto Jesus, Lord, it is good for us to be here: if thou wilt, let us make here three tabernacles; one for thee, and one for Moses, and one for Elias.

 

5 While he yet spake, behold, a bright cloud overshadowed them: and behold a voice out of the cloud, which said, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased; hear ye him.

 

6 And when the disciples heard it, they fell on their face, and were sore afraid.

 

7 And Jesus came and touched them, and said, Arise, and be not afraid.

 

8 And when they had lifted up their eyes, they saw no man, save Jesus only.

 

 

(Mark 9:2-10.) – The footnote of 4a states that John the Baptist was also here after his death

 

2 ¶ And after six days Jesus taketh with him Peter, and James, and John, and leadeth them up into an high mountain apart by themselves: and he was transfigured before them.

 

3 And his raiment became shining, exceeding white as snow; so as no fuller on earth can white them.

 

4 And there appeared unto them Elias with Moses: and they were talking with Jesus.

 

5 And Peter answered and said to Jesus, Master, it is good for us to be here: and let us make three tabernacles; one for thee, and one for Moses, and one for Elias.

 

6 For he wist not what to say; for they were sore afraid.

 

7 And there was a cloud that overshadowed them: and a voice came out of the cloud, saying, This is my beloved Son: hear him.

 

8 And suddenly, when they had looked round about, they saw no man any more, save Jesus only with themselves.

 

9 And as they came down from the mountain, he charged them that they should tell no man what things they had seen, till the Son of man were risen from the dead.

 

10 And they kept that saying with themselves, questioning one with another what the rising from the dead should mean.

 

 

(Luke 9:28-36.) – Moses and Elijah spoke to Christ concerning the events at Jerusalem, see verse 51.

 

28 ¶ And it came to pass about an eight days after these sayings, he took Peter and John and James, and went up into a mountain to pray.

 

29 And as he prayed, the fashion of his countenance was altered, and his raiment was white and glistering.

 

30 And, behold, there talked with him two men, which were Moses and Elias:

 

31 Who appeared in glory, and spake of his decease which he should accomplish at Jerusalem.

 

32 But Peter and they that were with him were heavy with sleep: and when they were awake, they saw his glory, and the two men that stood with him.

 

33 And it came to pass, as they departed from him, Peter said unto Jesus, Master, it is good for us to be here: and let us make three tabernacles; one for thee, and one for Moses, and one for Elias: not knowing what he said.

 

34 While he thus spake, there came a cloud, and overshadowed them: and they feared as they entered into the cloud.

 

35 And there came a voice out of the cloud, saying, This is my beloved Son: hear him.

 

36 And when the voice was past, Jesus was found alone. And they kept it close, and told no man in those days any of those things which they had seen.

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 63:20-21.) – The full significance of what happened on the mount has not been revealed.

 

20 Nevertheless, he that endureth in faith and doeth my will, the same shall overcome, and shall receive an inheritance upon the earth when the day of transfiguration shall come;

 

21 When the earth shall be transfigured, even according to the pattern which was shown unto mine apostles upon the mount; of which account the fulness ye have not yet received.

 

 

What Happened on the Mount of Transfiguration?

 

Until men attain a higher status of spiritual understanding than they now enjoy, they can learn only in part what took place upon the Mount of Transfiguration. From the New Testament accounts and from the added light revealed through Joseph Smith it appears evident that:

 

(1) Jesus singled out Peter, James, and John from the rest of the Twelve; took them upon an unnamed mountain; there he was transfigured before them, and they beheld his glory. Testifying later, John said, "We beheld his glory, the glory as of the only be—gotten of the Father" (John 1:14); and Peter, speaking of the same event, said they "were eyewitnesses of his majesty." (2 Pet. 1:16.)

 

(2) Peter, James, and John, were themselves "transfigured before him" (Teachings, p. 158), even as Moses, the Three Nephites, Joseph Smith, and many prophets of all ages have been transfigured, thus enabling them to entertain angels, see visions and comprehend the things of God. (Mormon Doctrine, pp. 725-726.)

 

(3) Moses and Elijah—two ancient prophets who were translated and taken to heaven without tasting death, so they could return with tangible bodies on this very occasion, an occasion preceding the day of resurrection—appeared on the mountain; and they and Jesus gave the keys of the kingdom to Peter, James, and John. (Teachings, p. 158.)

 

(4) John the Baptist, previously beheaded by Herod, apparently was also present. It may well be that other unnamed prophets, either coming as translated beings or as spirits from paradise, were also present.

 

(5) Peter, James, and John saw in vision the transfiguration of the earth, that is, they saw it renewed and returned to its paradisiacal state—an event that is to take place at the Second Coming when the millennial era is ushered in. (D&C 63:21D. & C. 63:20-21; Mormon Doctrine, pp. 718-719.)

 

(6) It appears that Peter, James, and John received their own endowments while on the mountain. (Doctrines of Salvation, vol. 2, p. 165.) Peter says that while there, they "received from God the Father honour and glory," seemingly bearing out this conclusion. It also appears that it was while on the mount that they received the more sure word of prophecy, it then being revealed to them that they were sealed up unto eternal life. (2 Pet. 1:16-19; D. & C. 131:5.)

 

(7) Apparently Jesus himself was strengthened and encouraged by Moses and Elijah so as to be prepared for the infinite sufferings and agony ahead of him in connection with working out the infinite and eternal atonement. (Jesus the Christ, p. 373.) Similar comfort had been given him by angelic visitants following his forty-day fast and its attendant temptations (Matt. 4:11), and an angel from heaven was yet to strengthen him when he would sweat great drops of blood in the Garden of Gethsemane. (Luke 22:42-44.)

 

(8) Certainly the three chosen apostles were taught in plainness "of his death and also his resurrection" (I. V. Luke 9:31), teachings which would be of inestimable value to them in the trying days ahead.

 

(9) It should also have been apparent to them that the old dispensations of the past had faded away, that the law (of which Moses was the symbol) and the prophets (of whom Elijah was the typifying representative) were subject to Him whom they were now commanded to hear.

 

(10) Apparently God the Father, overshadowed and hidden by a cloud, was present on the mountain, although our Lord's three associates, as far as the record stipulates, heard only his voice and did not see his form.

 

Matt. 17:1. After six days] Mark agrees that it was six days; Luke says it was eight. In other words, one week elapsed between Jesus' promise to Peter, to give him the keys of the kingdom, and that glorious day of transfiguration when the keys were actually conferred upon Peter and his two associates. Two of the synoptists are excluding the two terminal days from their count, the other is including them.

 

Peter, James, and John] Why were these three repeatedly singled out and given special blessings and privileges? They alone witnessed the raising of Jairus' daughter from the dead. (Mark 5:22-24, 35-43.) They alone beheld the glory and majesty of the transfigured Jesus; they alone received from him, and from Moses and Elijah the keys of the kingdom, being prohibited from so much as telling the others of the Twelve of these transcendent events until after our Lord's resurrection. They alone were taken to a spot in Gethsemane where they could behold his agony as he took upon himself the sins of the world. (Mark 14:32-42.) They were the ones who came to Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery in this dispensation to confer priesthood and keys. (D. & C. 27:12-13; 125:20.)

 

Why always these three and not various ones or even all of the Twelve? The plain fact is that Peter, James, and John were the First Presidency of the Church in their day. From the fragmentary New Testament accounts we have no way of knowing whether they served as a quorum distinct from the Twelve or whether they continued to serve both in the Presidency and in the Twelve. But by latter-day revelation we know that they held and restored "the keys of the kingdom, which belong always unto the Presidency of the High Priesthood" (D. & C. 81:2), or in other words, they were the First Presidency in their day.

 

An high mountain] Long held by tradition to have been Mt. Tabor, a less then eighteen hundred foot plateau in southern Galilee, which in that day was capped by a fortress and upon which, in the sixth century, three churches were erected, presumably to commemorate Peter's desire to erect three tabernacles. Later a monastery was built on Mt. Tabor. But more probably the site of the transfiguration was Mt. Hermon, a nine thousand foot emminence north of Caesarea Philippi, where Jesus had been the week before. Mt. Hermon is north of Galilee, and the record shows that after Jesus departed from the mount he then went through Galilee. (Mark 9: 30.)

 

 2. Transfigured] As a host of scriptures attest, many prophets in all ages have been transfigured, but none more majestic—ally and dramatically than the Chief of all prophets on this occasion on the mount. "Transfiguration is a special change in appearance and nature which is wrought upon a person or thing by the power of God. This divine transformation is from a lower to a higher state; it results in a more exalted, impressive, and glorious condition." (Mormon Doctrine, pp. 725-726.)

 

3.  Moses and Elias] Moses, the great prophet-statesman whose name symbolized the law, and Elijah the Tishbite, a prophet of so great fame that his name had come to typify and symbolize the collective wisdom and insight of all the prophets. Moses held the keys of the gathering of Israel and the leading of the ten tribes from the land of the north; Elijah, the keys of the sealing—power. These are the keys which they conferred upon Peter, James, and John upon the mount, and which they also conferred upon Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery in the Kirtland Temple nearly two thousand years later. (D. & C. 110:11-16.) Both of them were translated beings and had bodies of flesh and bones, a status they apparently enjoyed so that they could confer keys upon mortal men. We have a detailed scriptural account of Elijah's translation (2 Kings 2) and a number of scriptural references concerning Moses which can only be interpreted to mean that he too was taken to heaven without tasting death. (Alma 45:18-19; Mormon Doctrine, pp. 726-730; Doctrines of Salvation, vol 2, pp. 107-111.) When these two holy men appeared in this dispensation to restore again their keys and powers, they came as resurrected personages. (D. & C. 133:55.)

 

4. Let us make here three tabernacles] These words appear to have been spoken in response to some unrecorded statements of Moses and Elijah. Since the record is so fragmentary it is not possible to tell their exact meaning. In this connection, it should be noted that at the annual feast of Tabernacles, it was customary for worshipers to erect small booths in which they retired for private devotions.

 

5.  A bright cloud overshadowed them] Not a watery cloud, but what the Jews called the Shekinah or Dwelling cloud, the cloud which manifested the presence and glory of God. This cloud had rested upon the tabernacle in the wilderness (Num. 9:15-22), had covered Jehovah when he visited his people (Ex. 33:9-11; Num. 11:25), and is the one which enveloped Jesus, after his resurrection, when he ascended to his Father. (Acts 1:9.)

 

Hear ye him] Not Moses, whose very name symbolized the law to which Israel had been subject for fifteen hundred years; not Elijah, the one prophet whose name stood for all the prophets of all ages; not holy men who had come, as it were, from heaven above; not the prophecies and laws of the past; not all that the Jews held as holy and sacred! but "my beloved Son"—Hear ye him! Salvation centers in Christ; turn to him; believe him; follow him; obey him!

 

9. Vision] Moses and Elijah were personally present on the mount, even as they were actual visitants in the Kirtland Temple in April, 1836. (D. & C. 110.) Their appearance in each instance constituted a vision, meaning that, by the power of the Holy Ghost, those who beheld them saw within the veil. (Mormon Doctrine, pp. 745-747.) Visions are vouchsafed to men, not by the natural, but by the spiritual eyes. (Moses 1:11.)

 

No man] Not even their fellow apostles were to know as yet of the vision; even they were not yet prepared to receive the glorious truths revealed on the holy mount.

 

Mark 9:10. Although Jesus had spoken frequently of his coming death and resurrection, and although Peter, James, and John had heard Moses and Elijah discuss the same thing—giving as it were a heavenly approval of those portentous events ahead—yet even the chief ministers of Christ's kingdom had not yet caught the full vision of what was ahead for their Lord.

 

I. V. Mark 9:1. Many questions] How profitable it would be to know the questions asked, the answers given, the truths revealed.

 

3. John the Baptist] It is not to be understood that John the Baptist was the Elias who appeared with Moses to confer keys and authority upon those who then held the Melchizedek Priesthood, which higher priesthood already embraced and included all of the authority and power John had held and exercised during his ministry. Rather, for some reason that remains unknown—because of the partial record of the proceedings—John played some other part in the glorious manifestations then vouchsafed to mortals. Perhaps he was there, as the last legal administrator under the Old Covenant, to symbolize that the law was fulfilled and all old things were done away, thus contrasting his position with that of Peter, James, and John who were then becoming the "first" legal administrators of the New Kingdom.

 

Luke 9:28. To pray] How often it is that visions and revelations and the opening of the heavens grow out of fervent and devout prayer.

 

32. Heavy with sleep] Apparently Jesus and his three associates spent the night in the mountain, and the glorious theophanies there manifest were shown during the hours of darkness. The next day they returned to the other disciples and the multitude. (Luke 9: 37.)

 

 

(Bruce R. McConkie, Doctrinal New Testament Commentary, 3 vols. [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1965-1973], 1: 399.)

 

 

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 128:20.) – The Melchizedek priesthood with the keys to direct the affairs of the church in this dispensation.

 

20 And again, what do we hear? Glad tidings from Cumorah! Moroni, an angel from heaven, declaring the fulfilment of the prophets—the book to be revealed. A voice of the Lord in the wilderness of Fayette, Seneca county, declaring the three witnesses to bear record of the book! The voice of Michael on the banks of the Susquehanna, detecting the devil when he appeared as an angel of light! The voice of Peter, James, and John in the wilderness between Harmony, Susquehanna county, and Colesville, Broome county, on the Susquehanna river, declaring themselves as possessing the keys of the kingdom, and of the dispensation of the fulness of times!

 

 

What do these scriptures have in common?  Seeing Jesus Christ, in His own time, and in His own way!

 

(Joseph Smith-History: 16-17.)

 

16 But, exerting all my powers to call upon God to deliver me out of the power of this enemy which had seized upon me, and at the very moment when I was ready to sink into despair and abandon myself to destruction—not to an imaginary ruin, but to the power of some actual being from the unseen world, who had such marvelous power as I had never before felt in any being—just at this moment of great alarm, I saw a pillar of light exactly over my head, above the brightness of the sun, which descended gradually until it fell upon me.

 

17 It no sooner appeared than I found myself delivered from the enemy which held me bound. When the light rested upon me I saw two Personages, whose brightness and glory defy all description, standing above me in the air. One of them spake unto me, calling me by name and said, pointing to the other—This is My Beloved Son. Hear Him!

 

(Moses 1:1-2.)

 

1 The words of God, which he spake unto Moses at a time when Moses was caught up into an exceedingly high mountain,

 

2 And he saw God face to face, and he talked with him, and the glory of God was upon Moses; therefore Moses could endure his presence.

 

(2 Nephi 11:2-3.)

 

2 And now I, Nephi, write more of the words of Isaiah, for my soul delighteth in his words. For I will liken his words unto my people, and I will send them forth unto all my children, for he verily saw my Redeemer, even as I have seen him.

 

3 And my brother, Jacob, also has seen him as I have seen him; wherefore, I will send their words forth unto my children to prove unto them that my words are true. Wherefore, by the words of three, God hath said, I will establish my word. Nevertheless, God sendeth more witnesses, and he proveth all his words.

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 67:10.)

 

10 And again, verily I say unto you that it is your privilege, and a promise I give unto you that have been ordained unto this ministry, that inasmuch as you strip yourselves from jealousies and fears, and humble yourselves before me, for ye are not sufficiently humble, the veil shall be rent and you shall see me and know that I am—not with the carnal neither natural mind, but with the spiritual.

 

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 88:68.)

 

68 Therefore, sanctify yourselves that your minds become single to God, and the days will come that you shall see him; for he will unveil his face unto you, and it shall be in his own time, and in his own way, and according to his own will.

 

 

President of the Church – Holds all keys actively (the only one to do so)

Quorum of the 12 – Holds keys but are dormant, delegated use by the President of the Church

Stake Presidents – Only one to set apart missionaries, Bishops, and Elder’s quorum presidents

Bishops – Sets apart Teachers and Deacons quorum presidents

 

Once the 12 were removed from the earth there weren’t keys to confer on anyone.  Once the keys were off the earth there had to be a restoration of priesthood authority and keys to the earth.  So when the Apostles were gone the keys were also gone and those that held keys (Bishops) lost their authority to act or to pass those keys on to anyone else.

 

Elder George Q. Cannon said:

 

John had the right to baptize when he was upon the earth; he held the keys of that Priesthood. He baptized Jesus by virtue of the Priesthood which he held; and those keys had not been taken from him. At the time when Joseph Smith was ordained, there was no man on the face of the earth that held the keys of the Priesthood and the authority to ordain him. If there had been a man in...any other church extant upon the face of the earth, who had the keys of the Priesthood, Joseph Smith would not have been ordained by an angel, because the keys would have been here and been bestowed by the man who held them. (Journal of Discourses, 13:47.)

 

Those priesthood keys, now restored, had long been absent from the earth. The death of John the Baptist at the hands of the wicked Herod had not brought baptism to an end. Jesus had given this authority to His apostles, who continued to authorize the administration of this saving ordinance in addition to other ordinances of the higher priesthood among the faithful who joined the Church of Jesus Christ. However, with the death of the early apostles, and after the removal of the Apostle John from among the people in general, the early Church fell into a state of apostasy, and none were authorized to continue in the authority of the priesthood.

 

 

(Hoyt W. Brewster, Jr., Prophets, Priesthood Keys, and Succession [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1991], 22.)

 

 

 

Faith and Keys

Elder Henry B. Eyring
Of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles
Ensign, Oct. 2004, pp. 26-29

In a chapel far from Salt Lake City, in a place where a member of the Quorum of the Twelve rarely goes, a father approached me. He led his young son by the hand. As they reached me, he looked down at the boy, called him by name, and said, nodding his head towards me, "This is an Apostle." I could tell by the sound of the father's voice that he was hoping his son would feel more than that he was meeting a dignified visitor. He hoped that his son would feel a conviction that priesthood keys were on the earth in the Lord's Church. His son will need that conviction again and again. He will need it when he opens a letter from some future prophet he has never seen calling him to a mission. He will need it when he buries a child or a wife or a parent. He will need it for courage to follow direction to serve. He will need it for the comfort that comes from trusting a sealing power that binds forever.

Missionaries will invite investigators to meet a bishop or branch president today with the same intent. They hope that the investigators will feel far more than that they have met a nice man or even a great man. They will be praying that the investigators will feel a conviction that this apparently ordinary man holds priesthood keys in the Lord's Church. The investigators will need that conviction when they go into the waters of baptism. They will need it when they pay tithing. They will need that conviction when the bishop is inspired to give them a calling. They will need it when they see him presiding in the sacrament meeting and when he nourishes them by teaching the gospel.

And so missionaries and fathers, and all of us who serve others in the true Church, want to help those we love gain a lasting testimony that the keys of the priesthood are held by the Lord's servants in His Church. I speak today to encourage all who labor to instill and strengthen that testimony.

It will help to recognize some things. First, God is persistent and generous in offering the blessings of priesthood power to His children. Second, His children must choose for themselves to qualify for and receive those blessings. And third, Satan, the enemy of righteousness, has from the beginning tried to undermine the faith necessary to receive the blessings made possible by priesthood power.

I learned about those realities from a wise teacher nearly 25 years ago. I spoke in an ancient theater in Ephesus . Bright sunlight flooded the ground where the Apostle Paul had stood to preach. My topic was Paul, the Apostle called of God.

The audience was hundreds of Latter-day Saints. They were arranged on the rows of stone benches the Ephesians sat upon more than a millennium before. Among them were two living Apostles, Elder Mark E. Petersen and Elder James E. Faust.

As you can imagine, I had prepared carefully. I had read the Acts of the Apostles and the Epistles, both those of Paul and his fellow Apostles. I had read and pondered Paul's Epistle to the Ephesians.

I tried my best to honor Paul and his office. After the talk, a number of people said kind things. Both of the living Apostles were generous in their comments. But later, Elder Faust took me aside and, with a smile and with softness in his voice, said, "That was a good talk. But you left out the most important thing you could have said."

I asked him what that was. Weeks later he consented to tell me. His answer has been teaching me ever since.

He said that I could have told the people that if the Saints who heard Paul had possessed a testimony of the value and the power of the keys he held, perhaps the Apostles would not have had to be taken from the earth.

That sent me back to Paul's letter to the Ephesians. I could see that Paul wanted the people to feel the value of the chain of priesthood keys reaching from the Lord through His Apostles to them, the members of the Lord's Church. Paul was trying to build a testimony of those keys.

Paul testified to the Ephesians that Christ was at the head of His Church. And he taught that the Savior built His Church on a foundation of apostles and prophets who hold all the keys of the priesthood.

Despite the clarity and the power of his teaching and his example, Paul knew that an apostasy would come. He knew that apostles and prophets would be taken from the earth. And he knew that they would, in some great, future day, be restored. He wrote of that time to the Ephesians, speaking of what the Lord would do: "That in the dispensation of the fulness of times he might gather together in one all things in Christ, both which are in heaven, and which are on earth; even in him" (Eph. 1:10).

Paul looked forward to the ministry of the Prophet Joseph Smith, when the heavens would be opened again. It happened. John the Baptist came and conferred on mortals the priesthood of Aaron and the keys of the ministering of angels and of baptism by immersion for the remission of sins.

Ancient apostles and prophets returned and conferred upon Joseph the keys they held in mortality. Mortal men were ordained to the holy apostleship in February of 1835. Priesthood keys were given to the Twelve Apostles in the latter part of March 1844.

The Prophet Joseph Smith knew that his death was imminent. He knew that the precious priesthood keys and the apostleship must not be and would not be lost again.

One of the Apostles, Wilford Woodruff, left us this account of what happened in Nauvoo as the Prophet spoke to the Twelve:

"On that occasion the Prophet Joseph rose up and said to us: 'Brethren, I have desired to live to see this temple built. I shall never live to see it, but you will. I have sealed upon your heads all the keys of the kingdom of God . I have sealed upon you every key, power, principle that the God of heaven has revealed to me. Now, no matter where I may go or what I may do, the kingdom rests upon you.' “("The Keys of the Kingdom," Liahona, Apr. 2004, 42; Ensign, Apr. 2004, 30.)

Every prophet that followed Joseph, from Brigham Young to President Hinckley, has held and exercised those keys and has held the sacred apostleship.

But just as in the time of Paul, the power of those priesthood keys for us requires our faith. We have to know by inspiration that the priesthood keys are held by those who lead and serve us. That requires the witness of the Spirit.

And that depends upon our testimony that Jesus is the Christ and that He lives and leads His Church. We must also know for ourselves that the Lord restored His Church and the priesthood keys through the Prophet Joseph Smith. And we must have an assurance through the Holy Ghost, refreshed often, that those keys have been passed without interruption to the living prophet and that the Lord blesses and directs His people through the line of priesthood keys which reaches down through presidents of stakes and of districts and through bishops and branch presidents to us, wherever we are and no matter how far from the prophet and the apostles.

That is not easy today. It was not easy in the days of Paul. It has always been hard to recognize in fallible human beings the authorized servants of God. Paul must have seemed an ordinary man to many. Joseph Smith's cheerful disposition was seen by some as not fitting their expectations for a prophet of God.

Satan will always work on the Saints of God to undermine their faith in priesthood keys. One way he does it is to point out the humanity of those who hold them. He can in that way weaken our testimony and so cut us loose from the line of keys by which the Lord ties us to Him and can take us and our families home to Him and to our Heavenly Father.

Satan succeeded in undermining the testimony of men who had, with Joseph Smith, seen the heavens opened and heard the voices of angels. The evidence of their physical eyes and ears was not enough when they no longer could feel the testimony that the priesthood keys were still in place with Joseph.

The warning for us is plain. If we look for human frailty in humans, we will always find it. When we focus on finding the frailties of those who hold priesthood keys, we run risks for ourselves. When we speak or write to others of such frailties, we put them at risk.

We live in a world where finding fault in others seems to be the favorite blood sport. It has long been the basis of political campaign strategy. It is the theme of much television programming across the world. It sells newspapers. Whenever we meet anyone, our first, almost unconscious reaction may be to look for imperfections.

To keep ourselves grounded in the Lord's Church, we can and must train our eyes to recognize the power of the Lord in the service of those He has called. We must be worthy of the companionship of the Holy Ghost. And we need to pray for the Holy Ghost to help us know that men who lead us hold this power. For me, such prayers are most often answered when I am fully engaged in the Lord's service myself.

It happened in the aftermath of a disaster. A dam in Idaho broke on a June day. A wall of water struck the communities below it. Thousands of people, mostly Latter-day Saints, fled their homes to go to safety.

I was there as the people faced the terrible task of recovery. I saw the stake president gather his bishops to lead the people. We were cut off in those first days from any supervision from outside. I was in the meeting of local leaders when a director from the federal disaster agency arrived.

He tried to take over the meeting. With great force he began to list the things that he said needed to be done. As he read aloud each item, the stake president, who was sitting near him, said quietly, "We've already done that." After that went on for five or ten minutes, the federal official grew silent and sat down. He listened quietly as the stake president took reports from the bishops and gave directions.

For the meeting the next day, the federal disaster official arrived early. He sat toward the back. The stake president began the meeting. He took more reports, and he gave instructions. After a few minutes, the federal official, who had come with all the authority and resources of his great agency, said, "President Ricks, what would you like us to do?"

He recognized power. I saw more. I recognized the evidence of keys and the faith that unlocks their power.

It happened again when a man and his wife arrived back in town just after the dam had broken. They didn't go to their home. They went first to find their bishop. He was covered in mud, leading his members in mucking out homes. They asked what he would have them do.

They went to work. Much later, they took a few minutes to check on their own house. It was gone. So they went back to work wherever their bishop asked them to help. They knew where to go to get the Lord's direction for service in His Church.

I learned then as I have since how the stakes of Zion become places of safety. They become like a great family, united, caring for each other. It comes by simple faith.

By faith they are baptized and receive the Holy Ghost. As they continue to keep the commandments, that gift becomes constant. They can recognize spiritual things. It becomes easier to see the power of God working through the common people God calls to serve and lead them. Hearts are softened. Strangers become fellow citizens in the Lord's kingdom, united in loving bonds.

That happy condition will not last without a constant renewal of faith. The bishop we love will be released, as will the stake president. The Apostles we followed in faith will be taken home to the God who called them.

With those continual changes comes a great opportunity. We can act to qualify for the revelation that allows us to know that the keys are being passed by God from one person to another. We can seek to have that experience again and again. And we must, in order to receive the blessings God has for us and wants us to offer to others.

The answer to your prayer is not likely to be as dramatic as it was when some saw Brigham Young, as he spoke, take on the appearance of the martyred Prophet Joseph. But it can be as sure. And with that spiritual assurance will come peace and power. You will know again that this is the Lord's true and living Church, that He leads it through His ordained servants, and that He cares about us.

If enough of us exercise that faith and receive those assurances, God will lift up those who lead us and so bless our lives and our families. We will become what Paul so wanted for those he served: "built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone." (Eph. 2:20)

I testify, I know that Jesus Christ is our Savior and that He lives. I know that He is the rock upon which this, His true Church, stands. In the name of Jesus Christ, amen

Bishops conduct the affairs of their ward through priesthood keys.  It is his right to receive revelation for his ward to meet member’s needs.  He is a common judge of Israel and handles individual cases of repentance according to inspiration given by the Holy Ghost.  Delegation can be granted to counselors to fulfill specific assignments within the ward thus helping maintain unity between all organizations in the ward.  Delegation must be under the direction of the key holder, the Bishop.

 

Recently Bishops from the Stake President were given the key to set apart ward missionaries in his area.

 

4th Narrative and Discourse

The Preeminence of the Apostles in the Church

Matt. 13:54 - 19:2

4th Narrative
(Matt. 13:54-17:27)

In the fourth narrative, both the apostles and the church take on greater significance. The narrative begins with the rejection of Jesus by his own people in Nazareth. He had come "into his own country, he taught them in their synagogue." But the people of Nazareth said: "Is not this the carpenter's son? is not his mother called Mary? and his brethren, James, and Joses, and Simon, and Judas? And his sisters are they not all with us? Whence then hath this man all these things?" To this Matthew adds, "And they were all offended (Gk. skandalizo) in him." The Greek word skadalizo means to stumble because of a trap or stumbling block that is put in the way. The people of Nazareth could not accept Christ because their familiarity with him became a stumbling block. In response to this, the Savior said: "A prophet is not without honour, save in his own country, and in his own house" (13:54-57). This incident foreshadows the future rejection of the Savior by the Jews before Pontius Pilate. Of this rejection, the Apostle John said, "He came unto his own and his own received him not" (John 1:11).

The rejection of Jesus by his own is followed by the story of the beheading of John the Baptist (14:1-12). Not only does this story show the rejection of John but also forecasts the Savior's death.

The Preeminence of Peter and the Apostles

The next few stories in chapter 14 may have been included by Matthew to deal with the question that might have entered into the mind of his reader: "With John the Baptist gone and the death of Christ pending, who will shepherd the church?" The query is first answered in the story of the feeding of the five thousand (14:15-21). Upon hearing of the death of John, the Savior withdrew to a desert place -- apparently to be alone! But multitudes hearing he was there flocked out to see and hear him. His compassion upon the shepherdless sheep caused him to teach them and heal their sick (14:13-14).

As evening came on, the apostles urged the Savior to send the multitude away that they might purchase food. But he said: "They need not depart; give ye them to eat." But the multitude, which consisted of 5,000 men plus their wives and children, seemed to large a group for the apostles to feed since they only had five loaves of bread and two fishes. But the Savior said: "Bring them hither to me." He, who had rejected the temptation to make bread at the insistence of Satan to prove to him his divinity (Matt. 4:3), was now going to make bread to feed the hungry multitude. In the multiplication of the loaves and fishes, the Savior not only feed the multitude physical food, but foreshadowed the feeding of the church spiritual food through the instrumentality of the apostles. It should be noted that Matthew carefully describes that after the Savior took the bread and fishes, he looked up to heaven where God is and blessed the food, then he "gave the loaves to his disciples, and the disciples to the multitude" (14:15-21). It was in the Lord's plan that the apostles should "feed" the church under the direction of the Savior. This story established the line of authority: God, the Savior, the apostles, and then the multitude.

Having established the preeminence of the apostles in the church, the next story shows the preeminence of Peter among the apostles. The episode of the Savior walking on water is recorded by Matthew, Mark, and John. However, only Matthew informs us that Peter alone of the apostles had faith to walk on the water (14:22-33). And though his faith waned in a moment of opposition, Peter was nevertheless sustained by Christ and with his help Peter continued to walk on water. To his readers, Matthew seems to be saying that Peter, alone, is sustained by Jesus Christ to head the earthly church.

Tradition vs. the Higher Law

In chapter 15, Matthew records a controversy the Savior had with the Pharisees and scribes concerning the traditions held in the oral law, called in these verses "the tradition of the elders" (15:1-20). It is clear that the Savior would have the disciples and those who would follow them reject the rigidness of the Pharisaic rituals and follow a higher righteousness. This is reinforced through the story of the healing of the gentile woman's daughter (15:21-28). Pharisaic legislation would have only found contempt for the gentile woman but in this story the Savior had compassion on the woman solely based on her faith, an example of higher righteousness. This incident is followed by the feeding of the 4,000 which once again foreshadowed the shepherding of the church by the disciples (15:32-39).

How to Gain True Testimony

One of the main issues of chapter 16 centers on how the testimony of the divinity of Christ is granted. The chapter begins with the Pharisees and Sadducees (a curious combination!) confronting the Savior by asking for a "sign from heaven" proving his messiahship (16:1-12). To their request the Savior replied: "A wicked and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign." Then to the disciples the Savior issued this stern warning: "Take heed and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees"; a clear indication of the Savior's disdain for the religious practices of the Jewish leaders. Reception of divine testimony does not come as a result of hypocritical practices. How testimony is given is shown in the story of Peter's confession (16:13-20). In response to the Savior's query to the apostles, "But whom say ye that I am?", Peter declared, "Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God." Of this testimony, the Savior said: "Blessed art thou, Simon Bar-jona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven": thus revealing that divine testimony comes by revelation from God and not by spectacular manifestations or physical evidences. The Savior then noted that it would be on the foundation of this kind of revelation that he would "build his church." This is the first use of the term church in Matthew. At this point the Savior declared that he would give the "keys of the kingdom" to Peter. The keys of the kingdom are the right to rule the kingdom of God on earth. Thus, the story of Peter's confession is not only another demonstration of Peter's prominence among the apostles but also shows the growing importance of the church.

Keys of the Kingdom Given

Peter's preeminence is again illustrated in two of the three stories found in chapter 17. In the first, Peter, along with James and John, were taken by the Savior to a high mountain where the Savior was transfigured before them (17:1-13). Then appeared Moses and Elijah who gave to Peter, James, and John the keys of the kingdom which had previously been promised. Of this holy experience the three apostles were given the charge "Tell the vision to no man, until the Son of man be risen again from the dead." Of this experience, Elder Bruce R. McConkie said: "Then it was, on the snowy mountain heights, after the Father had spoken from the cloud, that Moses and Elijah, both taken to heaven without tasting death, had come in their corporeal bodies to a temple not made with hands, and given for that day and time their keys and powers to Peter, James, and John." (Ensign [May 1983] pp. 21-23).

Following the experience at the Mt. of Transfiguration, the story concerning the healing of the lunatic (17:14-21) was recorded to demonstrate the continued need for greater faith on the part of the apostles. In the final story, Peter is shown prominence among the disciples when those who collected the "tribute money" or temple tax came to him to ask if Jesus paid the tax (17:24-27).
 
 

4th Discourse

(Matt. 18:1-19:2)

In the fourth narrative, both the apostles and the church grew in importance. In the fourth discourse, the Savior discusses several issues relative to the church and its leaders. The first issue concerns humility (18:1-5). The Savior used a child to demonstrate the kind of humility required to be not only member of the kingdom but a leader therein. Said he: "Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven. Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, the same is greatest in the kingdom of heaven" (18:3-4). Amid the qualities that demonstrate the humility of a child that are necessary for a member of the church and a leader therein is the attribute of absolute dependence upon a higher power. This is especially true regarding the atonement. An infant who dies in its infancy, is utterly dependent upon the atonement of Jesus Christ for salvation (see. Mosiah 3:16). The infant is not capable of doing any works that could save him or herself. And just as a child is dependent upon Jesus Christ for salvation, so man must "humble themselves and become as little children, and believe that salvation was, and is, and is to come, in and through the atoning blood of Christ, the Lord Omnipotent" (Mosiah 3:18).

Causing Little Ones to Stumble

The aim of the next concern was "offences" or causing someone to stumble (18:6-9). The Savior warned that anyone who causes "these little ones" (i.e., converts to the new kingdom) to stumble, or be led astray, "it were better that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea." The word millstone mentioned in this passage is the English rendering of the Greek words mylos onikos which means "donkey millstone." These were large round stones (about three foot in diameter) that required the power of a donkey to turn the mill. This kind of a stone placed around the neck of someone would carry them immediately to the bottom of the sea.

In relation to this, the Savior reiterated what he said in the Sermon on the Mount: "Wherefore if thy hand or thy foot offend thee, cut them off." This concept may be viewed in two ways. Not only should members of the kingdom avoid sin of every kind but those who commit extreme sin and cause others to do so should be removed from the body of the church.

The Savior then spoke of the treatment of members of the church, especially those who are the lowly members of the kingdom (18:10-14). Of these he said, "Take heed that ye despise (Gk. kataphroneo, to look down on, treat with contempt, condemn, despise, disdain, think little or nothing of) not one of these little ones." In other words, the apostles were not think of members of the church, whether the be little children or new members, as beneath them or that they are better than the common member. To reinforce this idea he told the parable of the lost sheep: "How think ye? if a man have an hundred sheep, and one of them be gone astray, doth he not leave the ninety and nine, and goeth into the mountains, and seeketh that which is gone astray? And if so be that he find it, verily I say unto you, he rejoiceth more of that [sheep], than of the ninety and nine which went not astray."

Then interpreting the parable, the Savior said: "Even so it is not the will of your Father which is in heaven, that one of these little ones should perish."

Dealing With the Sinner

The topic of the discourse is shifted from those who cause others to stumble to those who have themselves stumbled (18:15-20). The leaders are told to confront those have sinned in an effort to reclaim them: "Moreover if thy brother shall trespass against thee, go and tell him his fault between thee and him alone: if he shall hear thee, thou hast gained thy brother." If they choose not to repent then they will be no better than "a heathen man and a publican."

The question any leader would ask concerning one who sins was asked by Peter: "Lord, how oft shall my brother sin against me, and I forgive him? till seven times?" Then Lord taught that the disciples ought to forgive others as often as they are sinned against: " I say not unto thee, Until seven times: but, Until seventy times seven" (18:21-22). To increase the faith of his hearers in this regard, the Savior told the parable of the unmerciful servant (18:23-35). In the parable the servants debt of 10,000 talents was equated with each man's sin - an insurmountable debt. The 100 pence debt (a reasonable debt) was equated with the most another may do against them. The point of the parable was that since God has forgiven the disciples of their sins (something they could not do for themselves) they should therefore from their hearts forgive "every one his brother their trespasses."

 

 

 

Matthew 20-23

March 15, 2007

 

 

 

Matthew 20 – Parable of the laborers in the vineyard

 

1st Laborer – Jesus Christ

 

Last Laborers – Gentiles

 

(Matthew 20:16.) – Many are called and few are chosen

 

16 So the last shall be first, and the first last: for many be called, but few chosen.

 

 

The Tender Mercies of the Lord

Elder David A. Bednar
Of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles

 

David A. Bednar, “The Tender Mercies of the Lord,” Ensign, May 2005, 99

I testify that the tender mercies of the Lord are available to all of us and that the Redeemer of Israel is eager to bestow such gifts upon us.

 

Six months ago, I stood at this pulpit for the first time as the newest member of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles. Both then and even more so now, I have felt and feel the weight of the call to serve and of the responsibility to teach with clarity and to testify with authority. I pray for and invite the assistance of the Holy Ghost as I now speak with you.

This afternoon I want to describe and discuss a spiritual impression I received a few moments before I stepped to this pulpit during the Sunday morning session of general conference last October. Elder Dieter F. Uchtdorf had just finished speaking and had declared his powerful witness of the Savior. Then we all stood together to sing the intermediate hymn that previously had been announced by President Gordon B. Hinckley. The intermediate hymn that morning was “Redeemer of Israel” (Hymns, no. 6).

Now, the music for the various conference sessions had been determined many weeks before—and obviously long before my new call to serve. If, however, I had been invited to suggest an intermediate hymn for that particular session of the conference—a hymn that would have been both edifying and spiritually soothing for me and for the congregation before my first address in this Conference Center—I would have selected my favorite hymn, “Redeemer of Israel.” Tears filled my eyes as I stood with you to sing that stirring hymn of the Restoration.

Near the conclusion of the singing, to my mind came this verse from the Book of Mormon: “But behold, I, Nephi, will show unto you that the tender mercies of the Lord are over all those whom he hath chosen, because of their faith, to make them mighty even unto the power of deliverance” (1 Ne. 1:20).

My mind was drawn immediately to Nephi’s phrase “the tender mercies of the Lord,” and I knew in that very moment I was experiencing just such a tender mercy. A loving Savior was sending me a most personal and timely message of comfort and reassurance through a hymn selected weeks previously. Some may count this experience as simply a nice coincidence, but I testify that the tender mercies of the Lord are real and that they do not occur randomly or merely by coincidence. Often, the Lord’s timing of His tender mercies helps us to both discern and acknowledge them.

What Are the Tender Mercies of the Lord?

Since last October I have reflected repeatedly upon the phrase “the tender mercies of the Lord.” Through personal study, observation, pondering, and prayer, I believe I have come to better understand that the Lord’s tender mercies are the very personal and individualized blessings, strength, protection, assurances, guidance, loving-kindnesses, consolation, support, and spiritual gifts which we receive from and because of and through the Lord Jesus Christ. Truly, the Lord suits “his mercies according to the conditions of the children of men” (D&C 46:15).

Recall how the Savior instructed His Apostles that He would not leave them comfortless. Not only would He send “another Comforter” (John 14:16), even the Holy Ghost, but the Savior said that He would come to them (see John 14:18). Let me suggest that one of the ways whereby the Savior comes to each of us is through His abundant and tender mercies. For instance, as you and I face challenges and tests in our lives, the gift of faith and an appropriate sense of personal confidence that reaches beyond our own capacity are two examples of the tender mercies of the Lord. Repentance and forgiveness of sins and peace of conscience are examples of the tender mercies of the Lord. And the persistence and the fortitude that enable us to press forward with cheerfulness through physical limitations and spiritual difficulties are examples of the tender mercies of the Lord.

In a recent stake conference, the tender mercies of the Lord were evident in the touching testimony of a young wife and mother of four whose husband was slain in Iraq in December of 2003. This stalwart sister recounted how, after being notified of her husband’s death, she received his Christmas card and message. In the midst of the abrupt reality of a dramatically altered life came to this good sister a timely and tender reminder that indeed families can be together forever. With permission I quote from that Christmas card:

“To the best family in the world! Have a great time together and remember the true meaning of Christmas! The Lord has made it possible for us to be together forever. So even when we are apart, we will still be together as a family.

“God bless and keep y’all safe and grant this Christmas to be our gift of love from us to Him above!!!

“All my love, Daddy and your loving husband!”

Clearly, the husband’s reference to being apart in his Christmas greeting referred to the separation caused by his military assignment. But to this sister, as a voice from the dust from a departed eternal companion and father, came a most needed spiritual reassurance and witness. As I indicated earlier, the Lord’s tender mercies do not occur randomly or merely by coincidence. Faithfulness, obedience, and humility invite tender mercies into our lives, and it is often the Lord’s timing that enables us to recognize and treasure these important blessings.

Some time ago I spoke with a priesthood leader who was prompted to memorize the names of all of the youth ages 13 to 21 in his stake. Using snapshots of the young men and women, he created flash cards that he reviewed while traveling on business and at other times. This priesthood leader quickly learned all of the names of the youth.

One night the priesthood leader had a dream about one of the young men whom he knew only from a picture. In the dream he saw the young man dressed in a white shirt and wearing a missionary name tag. With a companion seated at his side, the young man was teaching a family. The young man held the Book of Mormon in his hand, and he looked as if he were testifying of the truthfulness of the book. The priesthood leader then awoke from his dream.

At an ensuing priesthood gathering, the leader approached the young man he had seen in his dream and asked to talk with him for a few minutes. After a brief introduction, the leader called the young man by name and said: “I am not a dreamer. I have never had a dream about a single member of this stake, except for you. I am going to tell you about my dream, and then I would like you to help me understand what it means.”

The priesthood leader recounted the dream and asked the young man about its meaning. Choking with emotion, the young man simply replied, “It means God knows who I am.” The remainder of the conversation between this young man and his priesthood leader was most meaningful, and they agreed to meet and counsel together from time to time during the following months.

That young man received the Lord’s tender mercies through an inspired priesthood leader. I repeat again, the Lord’s tender mercies do not occur randomly or merely by coincidence. Faithfulness and obedience enable us to receive these important gifts and, frequently, the Lord’s timing helps us to recognize them.

We should not underestimate or overlook the power of the Lord’s tender mercies. The simpleness, the sweetness, and the constancy of the tender mercies of the Lord will do much to fortify and protect us in the troubled times in which we do now and will yet live. When words cannot provide the solace we need or express the joy we feel, when it is simply futile to attempt to explain that which is unexplainable, when logic and reason cannot yield adequate understanding about the injustices and inequities of life, when mortal experience and evaluation are insufficient to produce a desired outcome, and when it seems that perhaps we are so totally alone, truly we are blessed by the tender mercies of the Lord and made mighty even unto the power of deliverance (see 1 Ne. 1:20).

Who Are They Whom the Lord Has Chosen to Receive His Tender Mercies?

The word chosen in 1 Nephi 1:20 [1 Ne. 1:20] is central to understanding the concept of the Lord’s tender mercies. The dictionary indicates that chosen suggests one who is selected, taken by preference, or picked out. It also can be used to refer to the elect or chosen of God (Oxford English Dictionary Online, second ed. [1989], “Chosen”).

Some individuals who hear or read this message erroneously may discount or dismiss in their personal lives the availability of the tender mercies of the Lord, believing that “I certainly am not one who has been or ever will be chosen.” We may falsely think that such blessings and gifts are reserved for other people who appear to be more righteous or who serve in visible Church callings. I testify that the tender mercies of the Lord are available to all of us and that the Redeemer of Israel is eager to bestow such gifts upon us.

To be or to become chosen is not an exclusive status conferred upon us. Rather, you and I ultimately determine if we are chosen. Please now note the use of the word chosen in the following verses from the Doctrine and Covenants:

“Behold, there are many called, but few are chosen. And why are they not chosen?

“Because their hearts are set so much upon the things of this world, and aspire to the honors of men” (D&C 121:34–35; emphasis added).

I believe the implication of these verses is quite straightforward. God does not have a list of favorites to which we must hope our names will someday be added. He does not limit “the chosen” to a restricted few. Rather, it is our hearts and our aspirations and our obedience which definitively determine whether we are counted as one of God’s chosen.

Enoch was instructed by the Lord on this very point of doctrine. Please note the use of the word choose in these verses: “Behold these thy brethren; they are the workmanship of mine own hands, and I gave unto them their knowledge, in the day I created them; and in the Garden of Eden, gave I unto man his agency;

“And unto thy brethren have I said, and also given commandment, that they should love one another, and that they should choose me, their Father” (Moses 7:32–33; emphasis added).

As we learn in these scriptures, the fundamental purposes for the gift of agency were to love one another and to choose God. Thus we become God’s chosen and invite His tender mercies as we use our agency to choose God.

One of the most well-known and frequently cited passages of scripture is found in Moses 1:39. This verse clearly and concisely describes the work of the Eternal Father: “For behold, this is my work and my glory—to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of man” (emphasis added).

A companion scripture found in the Doctrine and Covenants describes with equal clarity and conciseness our primary work as the sons and daughters of the Eternal Father. Interestingly, this verse does not seem to be as well known and is not quoted with great frequency. “Behold, this is your work, to keep my commandments, yea, with all your might, mind and strength” (D&C 11:20; emphasis added).

Thus, the Father’s work is to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of His children. Our work is to keep His commandments with all of our might, mind, and strength—and we thereby become chosen and, through the Holy Ghost, receive and recognize the tender mercies of the Lord in our daily lives.

The very conference in which we are participating this weekend is yet another example of the Lord’s tender mercies. We have been blessed to receive inspired counsel from the leaders of the Savior’s Church—timely counsel for our day and for our circumstances and for our challenges. We have been instructed, lifted, edified, called to repentance, and strengthened. The spirit of this conference has fortified our faith and fueled our desire to repent, to obey, to improve, and to serve. Like you, I am eager to now act upon the reminders, counsel, and personal inspiration with which we have been blessed during this conference. And in just a few moments each of us will receive one of the Lord’s tender mercies as we hear the concluding remarks and testimony of President Gordon B. Hinckley. Truly, “the Lord is good to all: and his tender mercies are over all his works” (Ps. 145:9).

I am thankful for the Restoration of the gospel of Jesus Christ through the Prophet Joseph Smith and for the knowledge we have today about the Lord’s tender mercies. Our desires, faithfulness, and obedience invite and help us to discern His mercies in our lives. As one of His servants, I declare my witness that Jesus is the Christ, our Redeemer and our Savior. I know that He lives and that His tender mercies are available to all of us. Each of us can have eyes to see clearly and ears to hear distinctly the tender mercies of the Lord as they strengthen and assist us in these latter days. May our hearts always be filled with gratitude for His abundant and tender mercies. In the sacred name of Jesus Christ, amen.

The family exists forever >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Church Hierarchy does not exist forever

 

Dad, Mom, Children                                                            Home teachers, Visiting teachers,

                                                                                                Teachers, Elders Quorum, Bishop,

                                                                                                Stake President, Seventy, Apostles,

                                                                                          Prophet

 

The church exists to do the following

 

  1. Support the family
  2. Sustain the family
  3. Exalt the family

 

There is no advancement in the Church except the Quorum of the 12 as it is necessary to establish the next President/Prophet of the Church.

 

(Matthew 20:20-28.) – We don’t covet the limelight or positions in the Church

 

20 ¶ Then came to him the mother of Zebedee's children with her sons, worshipping him, and desiring a certain thing of him.

 

21 And he said unto her, What wilt thou? She saith unto him, Grant that these my two sons may sit, the one on thy right hand, and the other on the left, in thy kingdom.

 

22 But Jesus answered and said, Ye know not what ye ask. Are ye able to drink of the cup that I shall drink of, and to be baptized with the baptism that I am baptized with? They say unto him, We are able.

 

23 And he saith unto them, Ye shall drink indeed of my cup, and be baptized with the baptism that I am baptized with: but to sit on my right hand, and on my left, is not mine to give, but it shall be given to them for whom it is prepared of my Father.

 

24 And when the ten heard it, they were moved with indignation against the two brethren.

 

25 But Jesus called them unto him, and said, Ye know that the princes of the Gentiles exercise dominion over them, and they that are great exercise authority upon them.

 

26 But it shall not be so among you: but whosoever will be great among you, let him be your minister;

 

27 And whosoever will be chief among you, let him be your servant:

 

28 Even as the Son of man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a ransom for many.

 

(Matthew 20:30-34.) – There is no preferential treatment of a Bishop over a Primary teacher.  Christ has compassion for those who come unto him, regardless of color or title, Jew or Gentile

 

30 ¶ And, behold, two blind men sitting by the way side, when they heard that Jesus passed by, cried out, saying, Have mercy on us, O Lord, thou Son of David.

 

31 And the multitude rebuked them, because they should hold their peace: but they cried the more, saying, Have mercy on us, O Lord, thou Son of David.

 

32 And Jesus stood still, and called them, and said, What will ye that I shall do unto you?

 

33 They say unto him, Lord, that our eyes may be opened.

 

34 So Jesus had compassion on them, and touched their eyes: and immediately their eyes received sight, and they followed him.

 

 

5th Narrative and Discourse
The Kingdom Then and in the Last Days
Matt. 19:3-26:2

Bruce Satterfield
Department of Religious Education
Brigham Young University - Idaho

 

 

Parable of the Laborers in the Vineyard

Hearing this, Peter said: "Behold, we have forsaken all, and followed thee; what shall we have therefore?" There is a spirit of assumption about this question to which the Savior gives a gentle but firm rebuke. The rebuke is preceded by the Savior telling the disciples of both the reward and responsibility of their sacrifice. The responsibility is that they would judge the twelve tribes of Israel (cf. D. & C. 29:12, 1 Ne. 12:9-10). The reward is stated in these terms: "And every one that hath forsaken houses, or brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, or wife, or children, or lands, for my name's sake, shall receive an hundredfold, and shall inherit everlasting life" (19:27-29). 

Having stated the reward, the Savior gently rebuked Peter saying: "But many that are first shall be last; and the last shall be first" (19:30). To clarify his meaning, the Savior told a parable (20:1-16). A certain landowner went "early in the morning" to his local marketplace to hire day laborers to help in the harvest of his vineyard. Day laborers were despised in antiquity and were considered only a little above a slave (see Leon Morris, The Gospel According to Matthew, p. 499). When he found some laborers, he agreed to pay them a penny (Gk. dinarius) for a days work and then sent them off to work. A dinarius was the average wage for a days work at that time. The landowner went back to the marketplace about the third hour (9 AM) and found "others standing idle." He told them to go to the vineyard and work and he would pay them "whatsoever is right." At various times during the day, he went to the marketplace and hired more laborers. "About the eleventh hour [5 PM] he went out, and found others standing idle, and saith unto them, Why stand ye here all the day idle?" They responded, "Because no man hath hired us." He then told them to go to the vineyard and he would pay them "whatsoever is right."

At the end of the day, the landowner gathered all the laborers "beginning from the last unto the first" to give them their pay. Surprisingly, he gave every man who had been hired latter in the day a full days wage. Why the landowner did this is not specifically stated. But it is obvious that the landowner's compassion for even the most despised of men was superior to most. "We must assume that that householder knew that a poor man and his dependents needed the money if they were to have even the necessities of life. There is compassion behind the payment" (Leon Morris, The Gospel According to Matthew, p. 501).

Seeing this, those who had been hired first "supposed that they should have received more." But the landowner gave them the dinarius that he agreed to pay them. The men "murmured" saying, "These last have wrought but one hour, and thou hast made them equal unto us, which have borne the burden and heat of the day." The landowner replied, "Friend, I do thee no wrong: didst not thou agree with me for a penny? Take that thine is, and go thy way: I will give unto this last, even as unto thee." He then concluded, "Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? Is thine eye evil, because I am good?" After telling the parable, the Savior said: "So the last shall be first, and the first last: for many be called, but few chosen."

Original Interpretation. This parable, unique to Matthew's gospel, is very important to Matthew's overall message. Though the Apostles were first among those who accepted the gospel taught by Christ, their reward would be no greater than any who would receive the gospel latter. All who join the new kingdom Christ offered by accepting the gospel through faith, repenting of their sins, be baptized, receive the Holy Ghost, and endure to the end to receive the reward God promises to his children. It matters not that one joins the kingdom of God when they are eight or eighty, if their endure to the end in following the commandments, the reward is the same.

In light of the gentile theme that is found throughout his gospel, Matthew may have included this parable in an attempt to rebuke Christian Jews who were unhappy with the gospel being taken to the gentiles. "The vineyard is often used as a symbol for Israel (e.g., Isa. 5:1-7); those who take the parable this way argue that Israel is like the men who worked all day, while the Gentiles are symbolized in those who came later and were admitted by God's grace" (Leon Morris, The Gospel According to Matthew, p. 504).
 

On the Road to Jerusalem

At this point in the narrative, Matthew notes that the Savior began his journey to Jerusalem, where, as he had prophesied earlier, he would suffer death. Matthew records only a few incidents that happened along the way. But each incident concerns issues of the heart. As he journeyed, he took the apostles aside and once again prophesied of his future death and resurrection: "Behold, we go up to Jerusalem; and the Son of man shall be betrayed unto the chief priests and unto the scribes, and they shall condemn him to death, and shall deliver him to the Gentiles to mock, and to scourge, and to crucify him: and the third day he shall rise again." (20:18-19). As foreshadowed in several stories previously recorded in Matthew, the Savior would be rejected by the Jews whose hearts were hardened against him. 

Throughout his gospel, Matthew has recorded the Savior's teachings concerning the necessity of humility in the kingdom (see e.g., 18:1-4). The Savior taught that there is no place for self-seeking (see eg., 10:38-39). But to often his followers failed to learn the lessons taught. As the Savior continued his journey to Jerusalem James and John's mother approached the Savior and requested that her two sons sit on his right and left hand in his kingdom. The Savior responded, "Ye know not what ye ask . . . [it] is not mine to give." This is the Father's prerogative.

When the other apostles heard what James and John's mother had requested, "they were moved with indignation against the two brethren." Rebuking them, the Savior said: "whosoever will be great among you, let him be your minister; and whosoever will be chief among you, let him be your servant. Even as the Son of man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a ransom for many" (20:20-28). The greatest example of selfless service is the Savior's atoning sacrifice -- the whole reason he was going to Jerusalem! The apostles had missed the whole reason for their journey. Their hearts were not right with God. Instead, they were aspiring to the honors of men. Consequently they had become blind to as to their real role as disciples of Christ.

While they continued their journey, "two blind men sitting by the way side, when they heard that Jesus passed by, cried out, saying, Have mercy on us, O Lord, thou Son of David." The multitude who had gathered to see the Savior were annoyed by their petition and urged them to keep quite. But they cried out even louder. Their petition was not in vain. Jesus stopped and said, "What will ye that I shall do unto you?" They asked if he might give them sight. "So Jesus had compassion [on them], and touched their eyes: and immediately their eyes received sight, and they followed him" (20:30-34). The compassionless hearts of the multitude were contrasted by the Savior's matchless compassion. Truly, he had come to serve mankind and not himself.
 

The Savior Arrives at Jerusalem

The hard heart theme continues into the second part of the narrative. Having arrived at Jerusalem, the Savior entered the city riding the colt of an ass. To the amazement of the reader, the multitude who had gathered for Passover greeted him with the exultant cry of "Hosanna to the Son of David." Those who for the first time looked upon the Savior, asked, "Who is this?" The multitude responded, "This is Jesus the prophet of Nazareth of Galilee" (20:1-11). 

Matthew sees in the triumphal entry, the fulfillment of two Old Testament prophecies (Isaiah 62:11 and Zechariah 9:9): "Tell ye the daughter of Sion, Behold, thy King cometh unto thee, meek, and sitting upon an ass, and a colt the foal of an ass." The ass was an animal of peace and not one of war. Though the multitudes may have saw in Jesus a king who would throw off the shackles of their Roman overlords, he had in fact not come as a warrior. He had come as the Prince of Peace.

The Savior proceeded to the Temple mount. As he came into the Court of the Gentiles, the court that surrounded the inner courts immediately around the sanctuary, he saw those who sold sacrificial animals to pilgrims who had come great distances to participate in temple worship. He saw those who exchanged foreign currency into the local currency, the only currency accepted to pay the obligatory temple tax. 

All these were legitimate and necessary practices. It was not practical for those traveling great distances to bring their own sacrifices. Nor would they have carried with them the local currency for the temple tax. Yet, these practices need not be done on the Temple Mount! Further, it may be that those who sold sacrifices and changed money were doing it at an exorbitant rate, making their work a priestcraft (see Jacob's comments on the priestcrafts in Jerusalem at the time of Christ, 2 Nephi 10:3-6). That this took place is evidenced in rabbinical writings. We are told: "It once happened in Jerusalem that a pair of pigeons cost a golden denar [equal to 25 silver denars]. Rabban Simon ben Gamaliel said, 'By this Temple! [a form of oath] I will not rest this night before a pair of pigeons are sold at a silver denar" (Mishnah Kerithoth 1:7). 

The Savior found these practices repulsive. He then "cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves" declaring, "It is written, My house shall be called the house of prayer; but ye have made it a den of thieves" (21:12-13). 

After sanctifying the Temple, "the blind and the lame came to him in the temple; and he healed them" (21:14). Upon seeing these things, the chief priests and scribes (i.e., the Sanhedrin), "who were sore displeased" chided the Savior because the crowds had hailed him as the Son of David (21:15-16). This scene reflects the hard heart of the Jewish rulers andsets the stage for Matthew's climatic ending!
 

Confrontation Between Jesus and the Rulers

After the Savior spent the night in the small neighboring village of Bethany (21:17), he returned to Jerusalem. He passed along the way a fig tree that was full of leaves but was barren of fruit (21:18-22). This is unusual. One of the unique characteristics of a fig tree is that when it puts forth leaves, it begins to put forth fruit at the same time. Therefore, if one saw a fig tree with leaves he would expect to see figs as well. In a horrific display of his power, the Savior cursed the fig tree and it immediately "withered away." 

The tree was cursed because it did not produce fruit. Of this Spencer W. Kimball said, "The symbolism of the barren fig tree (Matt. 21:19) is eloquent. The unproductive tree was cursed for its barrenness" (The Miracle of Forgiveness, p.92). John the Baptist had warned the Jews, "the axe is laid unto the root of the trees: therefore every tree which bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire" (Matt. 3:10). Likewise, the Savior said, "Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire" (Matt. 7:19). In other words, if the Jews did not produce works acceptable to God, they would be destroyed. To this point in his ministry, the Savior had only displayed the positive nature of his power: the power to heal, give life, and do good. In cursing the barren fig tree, the Savior demonstrated his power to curse, smite, and destroy. In so doing, it foreshadowed the fate of those of the Jewish nation who would reject the ministry of Jesus.

Matthew's inclusion of the cursing of the fig tree sets the stage for the confrontation between the Savior and the Jewish leaders found in the last part of the fifth narrative (21:23-22:46). 

The Savior came to the temple where he began teaching the people. The rulers of the Jews came to him and questioned him: "By what authority doest thou these things? and who gave thee this authority?" "The question, of course, is a challenge. They are not asking for information about him; they know that he has not authority (in their sense of the word) to act as he has been doing. The temple was under the jurisdiction of the Sanhedrin, which they represented; the merchants and the money-changers exercised their trades under concessions granted by the Sanhedrin. They knew without asking that no authority had been granted to Jesus to interfere with the existing arrangements" (Francis W. Beare, The Gospel According to Matthew, p. 422).

In response to the challenge issued by the rulers, the Savior said that if they would tell him where John the Baptist received his authority to baptize, he would tell them where he had received his authority. But "they reasoned with themselves, saying, If we shall say, From heaven; he will say unto us, Why did ye not then believe him? But if we shall say, Of men; we fear the people; for all hold John as a prophet." So they replied, "We cannot tell." To which the Savior said, " Neither tell I you by what authority I do these things" (21:23-27). "These were men who had been asked a question to which they knew the answer, but who refused to give it because they were afraid of the consequences. Why should a teacher like Jesus answer the loaded questions of men like these?" (Leon Morris, The Gospel According to Matthew, p. 535)
 

Three Parables

Though the Savior did not answer the question the rulers asked, he did respond to their challenge by delivering three parables - the meanings of which were clear: the rejection of Jesus by the Jews would eventually lead to the destruction of Jerusalem and the Jews! 

Parable of the Two Sons In the first of the three parables (21:28-32), the hard hearts of the rulers were contrasted to the open hearts of the "publicans and harlots" who had come to believe on him. The Savior began the parable by asking the rulers a question: "But what think ye?" Then followed the parable: A farmer asked his two sons to go work in the fields. The first said, "I will not: but afterward he repented, and went." Then the second said, "I go, sir: and went not." The Savior then continued the question he had started the parable with, "Whether of them twain did the will of his father?" The answer was obvious, the first son! Having rightfully answered, the Savior then gave this stunning rebuke: "Verily I say unto you, That the publicans and the harlots go into the kingdom of God before you. For John came unto you in the way of righteousness, and ye believed him not: but the publicans and the harlots believed him: and ye, when ye had seen it, repented not afterward, that ye might believe him."

Interpretation The first son represented the publicans and harlots who had lead sinful lives. However upon hearing the gospel taught by Christ repented of their past actions. The second son represented the Pharisees and scribes   

Parable of the Wicked Husbandman Following on the heals of this statement, the Savior told them the parable of the householder (21:33-44). "A certain householder" who owned a vineyard rented his land to "husbandmen." They would take care of the vineyard and reap the rewards. Often, in circumstances such as presented in the parable, rent payment was a certain percentage of the harvest. As harvest time drew near, the householder sent his servants to collect the percentage of the harvest that belonged to him. But "the husbandmen took his servants, and beat one, and killed another, and stoned another." The householder sent other servants but the same fate befell them. Finally, he sent his own son hoping that "They will reverence my son." However, when the son came, the husbandmen "said among themselves, This is the heir; come, let us kill him, and let us seize on his inheritance." They carried out their foul plan. The Savior then asked the rulers what the householder would do to the husbandmen. Properly, they responded, "He will miserably destroy those wicked men, and will let out his vineyard unto other husbandmen, which shall render him the fruits in their seasons."

The meaning of the parable is obvious. Throughout their history, Jewish rulers had rejected the prophets of the Lord. But God had now sent is own son. Nonetheless, the rulers would reject him as well. The parable suggests the motive for their rejection. The husbandman said: "This is the heir; come, let us kill him, and let us seize on his inheritance." Jacob, in the Book of Mormon, explained that the rejection of Christ by the Jews was "because of priestcrafts and iniquities, they at Jerusalem will stiffen their necks against him, that he be crucified" (2 Ne. 10:5; emphasis added). The rulers were using the Lord's kingdom administered through the law of Moses, whom Christ was the legal heir of, as a priestcraft. The coming of Christ was seen by these rulers as an interruption of their priestcraft.

Not only did the Savior prophesy his own demise in this parable, but warned that because of the Jewish rejection of Christ the Jewish nation including their capital, Jerusalem, would suffer destruction. Further, he prophesied that the gentiles would be given the opportunity to have the gospel.
 

The Stone Rejected

Before continuing to the third parable, the Savior continued his warning of the impending destruction of the Jewish nation. "Did ye never read in the scriptures," he said, "The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner: this is the Lord's doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes?" (21:42). This quotation from Psalms 118:22, speaks of the rejection of the messiah, the stone of Irsael. He warned them that because they would reject him, the stone of Israel, "The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof" (21:43). The "nation" spoken of was an illusion to the gentiles. He then said, perhaps pointing to himself, "And whosoever shall fall on this stone shall be broken: but on whomsoever it shall fall, it will grind him to powder" (21:44). The JST adds: "And they said among themselves, Shall this man think that he alone can spoil this great kingdom? And they were angry with him" (JST Matt. 21:48). Though they wanted to "lay hands on him" they thought better "because they learned that the multitude took him for a prophet" (JST Matt. 21:49).

The JST continues the story adding further insight. "And now his disciples came to him, and Jesus said unto them, Marvel ye at the words of the parable which I spake unto them? Verily, I say unto you, I am the stone, and those wicked ones reject me. I am the head of the corner. These Jews shall fall upon me, and shall be broken. And the kingdom of God shall be taken from them, and shall be given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof; (meaning the Gentiles.) Wherefore, on whomsoever this stone shall fall, it shall grind him to powder. And when the Lord therefore of the vineyard cometh, he will destroy those miserable, wicked men, and will let again his vineyard unto other husbandmen, even in the last days, who shall render him the fruits in their seasons. And then understood they the parable which he spake unto them, that the Gentiles should be destroyed also, when the Lord should descend out of heaven to reign in his vineyard, which is the earth and the inhabitants thereof" (JST Matt. 21:50-56

The Parable of the Wedding Garment The Savior then delivered a third parable: the parable of the wedding garment (22:1-14). In the parable, a king "made a marriage for his son." "When the marriage was ready" (JST 22:3), the king sent forth his servants to tell those who had been invited to the wedding to "come unto the marriage." "But they made light of the servants, and went their ways; one to his farm, another to his merchandise; And the remnant took his servants, and entreated them spitefully, and slew them" (JST Matt. 22:5-6). When the king heard how his servants were treated, " he was wroth: and he sent forth his armies, and destroyed those murderers, and burned up their city." The king said, "The wedding is ready, but they which were bidden were not worthy. Go ye therefore into the highways, and as many as ye shall find, bid to the marriage." The servants did as they were commanded: they "went out into the highways, and gathered together all as many as they found, both bad and good: and the wedding was furnished with guests."

The parable could have ended here with the point being made. However, there is another point the Savior wished to make. "When the king came in to see the guests, he saw there a man which had not on a wedding garment." We do not know enough about wedding ceremonies during the time of Christ to understand the cultural aspect of this portion of the parable. But either a wedding garment was given to those invited to the wedding or at least suitable clothing was made available. Whatever is the case, it is apparent that having the wedding garment was essential for the wedding feast. The king asked, "Friend, how camest thou in hither not having a wedding garment?" Perhaps in the rush of filling the wedding with guests, the man was not able to get a garment or none was given him. But the man "was speechless." That is, he had had the opportunity to receive the garment but did not take it. "Then said the king to the servants, Bind him hand and foot, and take him away, and cast [him] into outer darkness; there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth." The Savior concluded the parable saying, "For many are called, but few chosen." The JST adds, "wherefore all do not have on the wedding garment" (JST Matt. 22:14).

Interpretation The King represents God, the Father. The king's son is Christ. The wedding feast represents Christ's coming among the Jews. The marriage metaphor was common metaphor used in the Old Testament to represent the covenant relationship between God and Israel (see Richard K. Hart, "The Marriage Metaphor," Ensign, Jan. 1995, pp. 22-25). 
 

The parable has two points. The first is more obvious than the second. The first point is a reiteration of the last parable: because the Jews rejected the Lord's servants, they would be destroyed and the gospel would be taken to the gentiles.

The second point focuses on preparation. Those who have been called to the wedding feast
 

" . . . the day of the Lord fast approaching when none except those who have won the wedding garment will be permitted to eat and drink in the presence of the Bridegroom, the Prince of Peace!"

(Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p.47) 
 

Bruce R. McConkie, The Mortal Messiah, Vol.3, p.367 - p.368

Salvation is a personal matter; it comes to individuals, not congregations. Church membership alone does not save; obedience after baptism is required. Each person called to the marriage feast will be examined separately, and of the many called to partake of the bounties of the gospel few only will wear the robes of righteousness which must clothe every citizen in the celestial heaven. True it is that the Lord "hath bid his guests," as Zephaniah said, but "all such as are clothed with strange apparel" shall be cast out. (Zeph. 1:7-8.)
 

Bruce R. McConkie, Doctrinal New Testament Commentary, Vol.1, p.598

11. Had not on a wedding garment] He had accepted the invitation (the gospel); joined with the true worshipers (come into the true Church); but had not put on the robes of righteousness (that is, had not worked out his salvation after baptism).
 
 
 "Many are called, but few are chosen." (Matt. 22:14.) Called to what? Chosen for what? Called into the Church, called to the holy priesthood, called to receive all of the blessings of the gospel, including the crowning blessing of eternal life. Chosen to inherit the blessings offered through the gospel and the priesthood; chosen for eternal life and exaltation. Called to the Church, but chosen to be sealed up unto eternal life and to have one's calling and election made sure. (Bruce R. McConkie, Doctrinal New Testament Commentary, 3:350)
 

This is incomplete according to Bro. Satterfield

Matthew 21 – 2 Nephi 26:29 – Alma 1

(2 Nephi 26:29.) -  Priestcrafts in the scriptures, they set themselves up for the light of the world and to receive praise.  When a mortal sets themselves up as a light to the world to receive money and praise,   only Christ is the “light” of the world. 

 

29 He commandeth that there shall be no priestcrafts; for, behold, priestcrafts are that men preach and set themselves up for a light unto the world, that they may get gain and praise of the world; but they seek not the welfare of Zion.

(2 Nephi 10:3-5.) – Jacob’s temple talk.  2 points will bring about the Savior’s death:  1. Priestcrafts (temple setting), 2.  Iniquities

 

3 Wherefore, as I said unto you, it must needs be expedient that Christ—for in the last night the angel spake unto me that this should be his name—should come among the Jews, among those who are the more wicked part of the world; and they shall crucify him—for thus it behooveth our God, and there is none other nation on earth that would crucify their God.

 

4 For should the mighty miracles be wrought among other nations they would repent, and know that he be their God.

 

5 But because of priestcrafts and iniquities, they at Jerusalem will stiffen their necks against him, that he be crucified.

 

The priests and money changers in the temple who wanted $$ and were enslaving the people with their wicked ways.  They charged extraordinary amounts and told people if they didn’t pay their sins wouldn’t be forgiven.

(Matthew 21:10-16.) – “Hosanna” means Jehovah save us please.  Christ drove out the money changers and quoted Jeremiah in verse 13. 

 

10 And when he was come into Jerusalem, all the city was moved, saying, Who is this?

 

11 And the multitude said, This is Jesus the prophet of Nazareth of Galilee.

 

12 ¶ And Jesus went into the temple of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves,

 

13 And said unto them, It is written, My house shall be called the house of prayer; but ye have made it a den of thieves.

 

14 And the blind and the lame came to him in the temple; and he healed them.

 

15 And when the chief priests and scribes saw the wonderful things that he did, and the children crying in the temple, and saying, Hosanna to the Son of David; they were sore displeased,

 

16 And said unto him, Hearest thou what these say? And Jesus saith unto them, Yea; have ye never read, Out of the mouth of babes and sucklings thou hast perfected praise?

 

 

(Alma 1:1-12.) – The rise of Nehorism, all will be redeemed, I will preach what you want to hear, for a price!

 

1 Now it came to pass that in the first year of the reign of the judges over the people of Nephi, from this time forward, king Mosiah having gone the way of all the earth, having warred a good warfare, walking uprightly before God, leaving none to reign in his stead; nevertheless he had established laws, and they were acknowledged by the people; therefore they were obliged to abide by the laws which he had made.

 

2 And it came to pass that in the first year of the reign of Alma in the judgment-seat, there was a man brought before him to be judged, a man who was large, and was noted for his much strength.

 

3 And he had gone about among the people, preaching to them that which he termed to be the word of God, bearing down against the church; declaring unto the people that every priest and teacher ought to become popular; and they ought not to labor with their hands, but that they ought to be supported by the people.

 

4 And he also testified unto the people that all mankind should be saved at the last day, and that they need not fear nor tremble, but that they might lift up their heads and rejoice; for the Lord had created all men, and had also redeemed all men; and, in the end, all men should have eternal life.

 

5 And it came to pass that he did teach these things so much that many did believe on his words, even so many that they began to support him and give him money.

 

6 And he began to be lifted up in the pride of his heart, and to wear very costly apparel, yea, and even began to establish a church after the manner of his preaching.

 

7 And it came to pass as he was going, to preach to those who believed on his word, he met a man who belonged to the church of God, yea, even one of their teachers; and he began to contend with him sharply, that he might lead away the people of the church; but the man withstood him, admonishing him with the words of God.

 

8 Now the name of the man was Gideon; and it was he who was an instrument in the hands of God in delivering the people of Limhi out of bondage.

 

9 Now, because Gideon withstood him with the words of God he was wroth with Gideon, and drew his sword and began to smite him. Now Gideon being stricken with many years, therefore he was not able to withstand his blows, therefore he was slain by the sword.

 

10 And the man who slew him was taken by the people of the church, and was brought before Alma, to be judged according to the crimes which he had committed.

 

11 And it came to pass that he stood before Alma and pleaded for himself with much boldness.

 

12 But Alma said unto him: Behold, this is the first time that priestcraft has been introduced among this people. And behold, thou art not only guilty of priestcraft, but hast endeavored to enforce it by the sword; and were priestcraft to be enforced among this people it would prove their entire destruction.

 

 

Christ cursing the fig tree foreshadows the future destruction of Jerusalem.  Christ has the power to save but also the power to destroy.  The temple at Jerusalem is the leaves but there are no fruits among the chief priests and elders, they are deceiving the people.

 

 (Matthew 21:18-20.)

 

18 Now in the morning as he returned into the city, he hungered.

 

19 And when he saw a fig tree in the way, he came to it, and found nothing thereon, but leaves only, and said unto it, Let no fruit grow on thee henceforward for ever. And presently the fig tree withered away.

 

20 And when the disciples saw it, they marvelled, saying, How soon is the fig tree withered away!

 

The 3 parables:  See Bro. Satterfield’s notes above.

 

(Matthew 21:28-32.) – Coveting was the problem; they want the praise of men.  All that the Chief priests coveted in the world and praise will be destroyed with the destruction of Jerusalem.

 

28 ¶ But what think ye? A certain man had two sons; and he came to the first, and said, Son, go work to day in my vineyard.

 

29 He answered and said, I will not: but afterward he repented, and went.

 

30 And he came to the second, and said likewise. And he answered and said, I go, sir: and went not.

 

31 Whether of them twain did the will of his father? They say unto him, The first. Jesus saith unto them, Verily I say unto you, That the publicans and the harlots go into the kingdom of God before you.

 

32 For John came unto you in the way of righteousness, and ye believed him not: but the publicans and the harlots believed him: and ye, when ye had seen it, repented not afterward, that ye might believe him.

 

The Parables of Judgment and Vengeance

 

The Second Coming is a day of judgment, a day of vengeance, a day of burning. "I will come near to you to judgment," is the Messianic promise. (Mal. 3:5.) In that day the wicked shall be destroyed; the righteous shall find eternal peace; and the Great Judge of all the earth shall measure to every man as his works merit. And so we find Jesus speaking parables that will cause men to ponder these truths, parables that will encourage them to do good and work righteousness so they will be numbered with the true saints in that dread day.

 

1. The Parable of the Gospel Net.

 

The Church and kingdom of God on earth, which both preaches and administers the holy gospel, is like a great draw net or seine that sweeps through large areas of the sea. Fish of every kind are caught. The good are gathered into vessels and the bad are cast away. And thus it shall be when the Lord Jesus returns in glory to judge and rule. The wicked—though caught in the gospel net, though in the Church, though gathered with the Israel of God—shall be severed from among the just and shall be cast "into the furnace of fire." (Matt. 13:47-53.) Church membership alone is no guarantee of salvation. Only the God-fearing and the righteous shall sit down in the kingdom of God with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and all the holy prophets.

 

2. The Parable of the Wicked Husbandmen.

 

The Divine Householder plants his earthly vineyard and lets it out to husbandmen. In due season he sends his servants to receive the fruits. They are rejected, beaten, stoned, and slain. Last of all he sends his Son, whom the wicked husbandmen slay—all of which brings forth the promise that the wicked husbandmen will be destroyed and the vineyard let out to other husbandmen who will bring forth fruits in due season. At this point Jesus said: "Did ye never read in the scriptures, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner: this is the Lord's doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes? . . . And whosoever shall fall on this stone shall be broken: but on whomsoever it shall fall, it will grind him to powder." (Matt. 21:33-46.)

 

To his disciples, by way of interpretation, Jesus said: "I am the stone, and those wicked ones reject me, and shall be broken. And the kingdom of God shall be taken from them, and shall be given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof; (meaning the Gentiles.) Wherefore, on whomsoever this stone shall fall, it shall grind him to powder. And when the Lord therefore of the vineyard cometh, he will destroy those miserable, wicked men, and will let again his vineyard unto other husbandmen, even in the last days, who shall render him the fruits in their seasons. And then understood they the parable which he spake unto them, that the Gentiles should be destroyed also, when the Lord should descend out of heaven to reign in his vineyard, which is the earth and the inhabitants thereof." (JST Matt. 21:51-56.)

 

3. The Parable of the Great Supper.

 

According to Jewish tradition, the resurrection of the just, and the subsequent setting up of the kingdom of God, was to be ushered in by a great festival in which all of the chosen people would participate. Hence their saying: "Blessed is he that shall eat bread in the kingdom of God." As a response to this very statement, Jesus tells of a certain man who gives a great supper. The guests who are bidden excuse themselves for frivolous and foolish reasons. Thereupon the master of the house, being angry, turns away from the covenant people, to whom he first offered the good things of his gospel table. Now he invites the Gentiles, in their spiritually halt and lame and blind status, as well as the pagans and foreigners who live at a great distance—he invites all these to come and eat at his table. (Luke 14:12-24.)

 

And thus it is reaffirmed that the blessings of the gospel profit only those who feast upon the eternal word, and that the alien and the foreigner who feast on the good work of God shall be blessed when the Supper of the Great God is prepared to usher in his millennial reign. It is of that feast of good things that the elders of Israel are now inviting all men to partake.

 

4. The Parable of the Marriage of the King's Son.

 

A certain king (who is God) prepares a marriage for his son (who is Christ), Jesus says, thus confirming the Jewish tradition that the Messianic kingdom will be ushered in by a great feast in which God and his people will be united, symbolically, in marriage. The wedding is ready, but the invited guests do not come. They make light of the invitation and even slay the servants who bring them the word. Hence, other people (the Gentiles) are invited and the feast goes forward. But when one comes without a wedding garment (the robes of righteousness), the king says: "Bind him hand and foot, and take him away, and cast him into outer darkness; there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth." (Matt. 22:4Matt. 22:1-14.)

 

And so it is, as the millennial day approaches, that the servants of the Lord go forth, inviting all men, Jew and Gentile alike, to come to "the supper of the Lamb," to "make ready for the Bridegroom," to come to "a feast of fat things," and "of wine on the lees well refined," to come to "a supper of the house of the Lord, well prepared, unto which all nations shall be invited." (D&C 58:6-11; 65:3.) And it shall yet come to pass that those who accept the invitation and come to the feast, but who do not wear the approved wedding garments and are not clothed in the robes of righteousness, shall be cast into outer darkness. In that day only the pure and the clean shall feast at the eternal table.

 

 

(Bruce R. McConkie, The Millennial Messiah: The Second Coming of the Son of Man [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1982], 344.)

 

 

 

TRIUMPHAL ENTRY AND A DAY OF DEBATE (Matthew 21-23)

 

JOSEPH F. MCCONKIE

 

Though we treasure all the words and acts of Christ, none have made a deeper imprint upon the hearts and minds of his followers than those things he said and did immediately before his death. This chapter will consider the events of the first three days of the passion week.

 

Jesus Enters the Holy City as Its King

 

At the time of the Passover it had become the habit of Jesus to take refuge in the village of Bethany, which rested near the eastern crest of the Mount of Olives facing Jericho and the Dead Sea. In distance it was little more than a mile and one-half from Jerusalem and the temple. Here Christ was the honored guest of Lazarus, his sisters Mary and Martha, and Simon the leper, in whose home he would yet receive a holy anointing preparatory to his burial. That Sunday morning his disciples gathered so that they might walk together to the temple, where it was anticipated that Jesus would preach to the great throngs assembling from many nations for the commemoration of the Passover, setting in motion events by which he would be proclaimed the Messiah and fulfill ancient prophecy.

 

As the little band left Bethany for Jerusalem, they soon had a multitude following them. The raising of Lazarus from the dead after his body had begun to decay was a miracle of such magnitude that as word of it spread, people were drawn to the vicinity to see for themselves this man who once was dead and to hear the words of this miracle-working prophet from Galilee. At Bethphage, Jesus told two of his disciples, presumably Peter and John, to go to a nearby village, where they would find an ass with a colt that had never before been ridden. They were to untie the colt and bring it to him. If they were asked what they were doing, they were instructed to say, "The Lord hath need of him," and without further question they would be allowed to take it. fn

 

The disciples then went into the village as they had been instructed, found the colt as they had been told, were challenged as anticipated, responded according to their instructions, and were allowed to bring the young donkey to the Master. Then they set their coats on the colt, "and Jesus took the colt and sat thereon; and they followed him." (JST, Matt. 21:5.) The gathering multitude commenced to throw their own outer garments, along with palm branches, in the path of the colt with such cries as "Hosanna to the Son of David: Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord; Hosanna in the highest." (Matt. 21:9.)

 

Like much that was to take place in that last week, this procession was richly symbolic and deeply rooted in scriptural tradition. One writer has said: "To ride upon white asses or ass-colts was the privilege of persons of high rank, princes, judges, and prophets." fn Christ's doing so attested that he entered the Holy City as its rightful king, as did the shouts of Hosanna—meaning "save now," "save we pray," or "save we beseech thee." The matter could not be stated more plainly; the people were announcing Jesus of Nazareth as their king and deliverer. The declarations that he was David's son—the promise of kingship having been given David's heirs (2 Sam. 7:12-16)—announced him as their king, as did the palm leaves and garments that were strewn before him. Nor was this all, for this very event had been detailed by the prophet Zechariah. "Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Zion," he had written. "Shout, O daughter of Jerusalem: behold, thy King cometh unto thee: he is just, and having salvation; lowly, and riding upon an ass, and upon a colt the foal of an ass." fn (Zech. 9:9.)

 

The implication of this ritual entrance into Jerusalem was not lost on those who witnessed it, for some of the Pharisees among the multitude demanded that he rebuke his disciples and constrain their expressions. To this he responded, "I tell you that, if these should hold their peace, the stones would immediately cry out." (Luke 19:40.)

 

We must not suppose that the honor thus paid to Jesus in this moment of triumph was born of ignorance. The testimony of this multitude of believers would stand as a witness against the city of Jerusalem over which Christ now wept. Luke alone records the event: "When he was come near, he beheld the city, and wept over it, Saying, If thou hadst known, even thou, at least in this thy day, the things which belong unto thy peace! but now they are hid from thine eyes. For the days shall come upon thee, that thine enemies shall cast a trench about thee, and compass thee round, and keep thee in on every side, and shall lay thee even with the ground, and thy children within thee; and they shall not leave in thee one stone upon another; because thou knewest not the time of thy visitation." fn (Luke 19:41-44.)

 

The nation of Judah, with Jerusalem as its chief city, was doomed for rejecting its Messiah, yet as Jesus walked the temple grounds that day before he returned to Bethany, he blessed his disciples. (JST, Mark 11:13.) They, by watchful obedience to his words, would be spared the calamity that was to befall the wicked. (Mark 13:14-16.)

 

Jesus—One Having Authority

 

The holy party returned to Bethany for refuge and rest that Sunday evening. How the night was spent we do not know; perhaps Christ continued his instruction to the Twelve, or perhaps the time was spent in meditation and prayer, or maybe they just rested quietly at the home of Simon the leper. In the scriptural account we are invited to join them again Monday morning as they were en route to the temple. As they walked and talked, Christ saw "afar off" a fig tree "having leaves," to which he went in the obvious expectation of obtaining fruit, so that he and the disciples might take refreshment. The tree, however, was barren. Mark tells us that "the time of figs was not yet," meaning that it was too early in the season for figs to have ripened. Christ, finding the tree to be without fruit, cursed it and then proceeded to the temple. The following morning, when he and the apostles passed that way again, Peter observed that the cursed tree had already "withered away." (Mark 11:12-14, 20-24.)

 

We have no indication that the Savior explained his action to his disciples, nor does the scriptural account offer explanation. Apparently it was left to them, as it has been for us, to discern the purpose of the Master Teacher in so doing. May I suggest that the event combined an ingenious teaching moment with the spirit of prophecy. As I have written elsewhere:

 

All present knew that fig trees bring forth their fruit before their leaves. All were equally aware that it would be some weeks before fig trees normally gave fruit. Yet the profusion of leaves on this tree constituted an announcement that it was laden with fruit. Christ was thus attracted to it. The symbol was perfect—a tree professing fruits and having none standing in the very shadows of the temple where a corrupt priesthood professed righteousness and devotion to Israel's God as they plotted the death of his Son. How better could Christ have typified the rustling leaves of religious pretense that took refuge within the temple walls? And does not such hypocrisy, be it individual or national, merit the disdain and curse of that very authority it mocks?

 

The stage was set, the lesson was most timely, and in the false pretense of the fig tree was to be found perfect typecasting. The moment now belonged to the Master Teacher, who used it to dramatize his power over nature and evidence once again his claim to Messiahship, while making the fig tree a prophetic type of what befalls those who profess his authority and fail to bring forth good fruits. Of such he has said that he will curse them "with the heaviest of all cursings." (D&C 41:1.) fn

 

When Jesus entered the temple, his heart and soul filled with righteous indignation for the manner in which his Father's house, this sacred place of prayer and revelation, was being polluted with the hypocrisy of a corrupt priesthood and a nation that willingly partook of evil fruits offered them. Repeating an action that had introduced his ministry some three years previously (John 2:13-17), he cast out all those who made merchandise of his Father's house, overthrowing "the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves," and telling them they had made "the house of prayer" into "a den of thieves." (Matt. 21:12-13.) "Then, having with physical force driven the wicked from the holy sanctuary, he remained to heal, teach, and receive again from believing disciples a renewal of the same acclaim, hosannas, and vocal acceptance of his divine Sonship, as he previously accepted while entering Jerusalem in triumph." fn

 

That night as Jesus again sought refuge and rest in Bethany, the councils of Beelzebub met in Jerusalem, seeking his destruction. Tuesday morning, as he taught in the temple, the body of his listeners parted to admit a delegation consisting of the chief priests, elders of the Sanhedrin, and learned rabbis. They had devised a scheme to discredit him in the eyes of the people and to show him to be in violation of the Mosaic law. Their question was twofold: By what authority did he preach, and who had given him that authority?

 

This question is most interesting. First, when he had previously cleansed the temple, he was challenged to prove his authority by showing a sign. (John 2:18.) Signs were no longer sought; they had been given in all too great abundance. The previous day these same men had themselves witnessed "the wonderful things that he did." (Matt. 21:15.) The issue now was one of authority to teach the gospel. It was well understood that no one could take that honor unto himself. If Jesus could claim no authority, he would obviously be in conflict with the Mosaic law and would have no right to preach the gospel. On the other hand, should he claim such authority, but not having received it from his questioners or those they represented, he would be accused of blasphemy.

 

Christ responded to their question with a question, assuring them that if they would answer his question, he would most certainly answer theirs. He then asked them by what authority John the Baptist performed baptisms. Was it from heaven or of men? As they huddled together, they quickly realized that if they acknowledged that John's authority came from heaven, they would be condemned for not having recognized it and not having been baptized at his hands. On the other hand, if they said that the Baptist's authority was of men, they would offend the people, "for all [held] John as a prophet." (Matt. 21:26.) Thus they had ensnared themselves in the trap they had laid for the Master, and they were forced to admit that they could not answer. He responded, "Neither tell I you by what authority I do these things." (Matt. 21:27.) His answer was tantamount to saying: "You have your answer; John gave it to you at Bethabara, and my Father confirmed it by his own voice out of heaven when he said at my baptism: 'This is my Beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased. Hear ye him.'" fn

 

Three Parables to the Jews

 

Without explanation of any sort, the scriptural text appears to leave the matter of authority (growing out of the questions put to Christ by the chief priests, scribes, and elders), and has Christ relate the "Parable of the Two Sons." (Matt. 21:28-32.) In fact, the parable skillfully answers the question about authority. It is a simple story about a man with two sons whom he asked to labor in his vineyard. The first son said he would not go but repented and went, while the second son said he would go but did not. The question was, which of the two did the will of their father?

 

The simplicity of the story compelled those to whom it was directed to respond that it was the first son who did his father's will, whereupon Jesus made this application: "Verily I say unto you, That the publicans and the harlots shall go into the kingdom of God before you. For John came unto you in the way of righteousness, and bore record of me, and ye believed him not; but the publicans and the harlots believed him; and ye, afterward, when ye had seen me, repented not, that ye might believe him. For he that believed not John concerning me, cannot believe me, except he first repent. And except ye repent, the preaching of John shall condemn you in the day of judgment." (JST, Matt. 21:31-34.)

 

To those spiritually in tune, the message was plain. The father is God; the first son represents the publicans and harlots who repented of their sins and became faithful followers of Christ; the second son represents the Jewish leaders who professed to be about their Father's business but were in fact cankering in wickedness, refusing the most overwhelming array of evidence ever vouchsafed to mortal men to testify that Jesus was the Christ. John had come to bear witness of Christ; his message was one of righteousness and salvation. The publicans and harlots repented and thus were led by John to Christ. The lawyers and Jewish leaders rejected John and, having done so, could not accept Christ, for John and Christ were one. To accept John and his heaven-sent authority was to accept Christ and his authority; to reject John was to seal the heavens—to reject Christ, and to reject the message and authority of salvation.

 

In the hardness of their hearts and the bitterness of their souls, we witness the abomination that would precede the desolation of both the temple and the nation of the Jews. Here within the very walls of the temple, where every ritual movement had been designed in the councils of heaven to testify of Christ, and every officiator to personify his likeness, those so chosen stood in open rebellion to him. To them he spoke in parables, that their "unrighteousness might be rewarded" to them. (JST, Matt. 21:34.)

 

Christ then related the "Parable of the Wicked Husbandmen," by which those corrupt priests, scribes, Pharisees, and elders pronounced their own judgment. (Matt. 21:33-44.) The parable concerns a householder who planted a vineyard, hedged it, dug a winepress in it, built a tower to protect it, placed it in the trust of husbandmen, and then left for a distant country. At the time of harvest he sent servants to receive the fruits of his vineyard, only to have them beaten or killed in one manner or another. Finally he sent "his son, saying, They will reverence my son. But when the husbandmen saw the son, they said among themselves, This is the heir; come, let us kill him, and let us seize on his inheritance." (Matt. 21:37-38.) Thus they killed the son.

 

Christ asked of his antagonists, "When the lord therefore of the vineyard cometh, what will he do unto those husbandmen?" To that they responded, "He will miserably destroy those wicked men, and will let out his vineyard unto other husbandmen, which shall render him the fruits in their seasons." (Matt. 21:40-41.) By their own mouths, and that too while acting in their official capacity, those corrupt "husbandmen" of Israel had passed judgment upon themselves. According to their own word, they were "wicked men" who ought to be "miserably destroy[ed]" and their stewardship properly given to others. For the third time in a row this contingent of scribes, elders, Pharisees, and chief priests (who but represented their counterparts throughout the nation) had become entangled in their own web and found themselves admitting their own guilt. Let it not be lost upon the reader that in this parable the wicked husbandmen, who had now been identified as the leaders of the Jews, recognized the heir of the Father and knowingly killed him!

 

At this point Jesus asked them if they had not read in the scriptures how it was prophesied that the stone rejected by the builders of the temple would yet be discovered to be the chief cornerstone. fn (Matt. 21:42; Ps. 118:22.) Again the meaning was clear: Jesus of Nazareth was announcing himself to be the Chief Cornerstone in his Father's house and was identifying the spiritually blind and hostile Jewish leaders as the builders who would reject him, along with their nation, until the time of his second coming.

 

Humiliated and angered, these devils cloaked in piety sought to lay hands on Christ but were prevented by his followers. (Matt. 21:46.) Away from their presence, Christ spoke plainly to his disciples, saying, "I am the stone, and those wicked ones reject me. I am the head of the corner. These Jews shall fall upon me, and shall be broken. And the kingdom of God shall be taken from them, and shall be given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof." (JST, Matt. 21:51-53.) Those upon whom the stone fell, he said, would be ground to powder. He extended his prophecy to the last days, when, he said, the vineyard of the Lord would be given to other husbandmen who would render its fruits to the Lord. (JST, Matt. 21:54-56.)

 

Jesus then related a third parable, one commonly known to us as the "Parable of the Royal Marriage Feast." (Matt. 22:4Matt. 22:1-14.) Jewish tradition had long held that the Messianic era would be ushered in by a great feast, one symbolic of the covenant that would exist between Israel and her Redeemer. In this parable Jesus likened that covenant meal to a royal wedding feast and prophetically announced who the children of the covenant would be.

 

The kingdom of heaven, he said, would be like a king who, having prepared a feast for his son's wedding, sent his servants to summon the guests he had invited, but they would not come. Other servants were sent to tell of all the good and rich things that had been prepared for those invited. Still those whom the king desired to honor would not come, being involved in their own affairs. Some of their number even attacked the king's messengers and killed them. In anger, the king sent an army to destroy the murderers and burn their city. With the wedding feast ready and the guests both unwilling and unworthy to come, the king sent his servants to the highways to invite to the feast all that would come. Many were gathered, "both bad and good: and the wedding was furnished with guests." (Matt. 22:10.) When the king made his appearance, he saw among his guests a man who was not clothed in a wedding garment. Asked why he was not properly dressed, the man was speechless. The king then directed his servants to "bind him hand and foot, and take him away," casting him into "outer darkness," the place of "weeping and gnashing of teeth." Concluding the parable, Jesus said, "Many are called, but few are chosen." (Matt. 22:13-14.)

 

"The interpretation of much of the parable is obvious. The king is God; the son is Christ; the place of the wedding feast is the kingdom of heaven; those bidden to the feast are those to whom the message of the gospel is taken; the servants are obviously the prophets who had been rejected and killed by those of their own nation; the army, it appears, was that of Rome; and the city, Jerusalem. After their rejection by Israel, the servants went to the gentile nations, preaching to all, the righteous and unrighteous alike." fn

 

What is not evident to the modern reader is why a particular dress was required for the king's guests and why the penalty for improper dress was so severe. To those of the Savior's audience, it was well known that one had to be suitably dressed to appear before a king. The apparel of the guest was a reflection of respect for the host. It was also commonly understood that the appropriate dress for such an occasion would be white robes. fn Apparently the people invited from the highways of the earth would have neither time nor means to procure the appropriate wedding clothing, so the king supplied his guests from his own wardrobe, a common practice. Thus all had been invited to clothe themselves in the garments of royalty. The man cast out had chosen to trust in his own dress rather than that provided by the king. "By interpretation, he had chosen to join the true worshippers, that is, the church or kingdom of God, yet he had not chosen to dress as the others had dressed. He was not one with them. He desired the full blessings of the kingdom, but on his own terms, not those of the king. He had spurned the ritual garment and the righteousness associated with it. This is emphasized in the JST, which adds to the statement that 'many are called, but few chosen' the explanation, that 'all do not have on the wedding garment' (JST, Matt. 22:14.)" fn

 

Thus Jesus reminded his listeners of truths long known to them—that the children of the covenant must be found wearing the garments of purity and holiness, garments made white through "the blood of the Lamb." (Rev. 7:14.) John the Revelator would yet write to explain that this "fine linen, clean and white" represented "the righteousness of the saints," and thus the clothing of those "called unto the marriage supper of the Lamb." (Rev. 19:8-9.)

 

In telling this parable, Jesus corrected the tradition of the Jews that they alone would be numbered among the covenant people, and he emphasized that the covenant could be entered into only in purity and righteousness. The Book of Mormon, our most perfect witness of Christ, teaches this doctrine thus: "As many of the Gentiles as will repent are the covenant people of the Lord; and as many of the Jews as will not repent shall be cast off; for the Lord covenanteth with none save it be with them that repent and believe in his Son, who is the Holy One of Israel." (2 Ne. 30:2.)

 

Render to God and Caesar Their Own

 

Hatred makes strange bedfellows. Next we read of the Pharisees striking hands with the Herodians in an attempt to entrap the Savior. Of this event Elder McConkie wrote: "If ever a plot was conceived in hell, born in hate, and acted out with satanic cunning, it was the jointly concocted stratagem of the Pharisees and Herodians on the matter of paying tribute to Caesar." fn The Herodians were Jews who had sold their souls to Herod and, with him, were fawning sycophants of Rome. The Pharisees, on the other hand, were Jews fanatic in their profession of devotion to the law of Moses and the observance of traditions they extorted from it. Between Pharisee and Herodian there was no common ground, yet both were servants of the same master, at whose bidding they now united in the effort to betray the Son of God.

 

This delegation of devils came, as devils so often do, with pretended sincerity and words flowing like a river of praise. "Master," they said, "we know that thou art true, and teachest the way of God in truth, neither carest thou for any man: for thou regardest not the person of men. Tell us therefore, What thinkest thou? Is it lawful to give tribute unto Caesar, or not?" (Matt. 22:16-17.)

 

Their trap was most clever. Were Christ to say, "Yes, pay the hated tax to Rome, as the law requires," the Pharisees would inflame a beleaguered and oppressed people against him. Should he say, "No, God alone is our king, we ought to pay no tribute to a foreign power," the Herodians would have him arrested for sedition and rebellion against the government. "Why tempt me, ye hypocrites?" came the response, evidencing that he had not been beguiled by their flattery. "Shew me the tribute money," he said, and they produced a coin that bore the effigy and name of Tiberius Caesar, emperor of Rome. "Whose is this image and superscription?" Jesus asked. They answered, "Caesar's." Then he said to them, "Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's." (Matt. 22:18-21.)

 

With inspired insight Elder James E. Talmage observed:

 

One may draw a lesson if he will, from the association of our Lord's words with the occurrence of Caesar's image on the coin. It was that effigy with its accompanying superscription that gave special point to His memorable instruction, "Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's". This was followed by the further injunction: "and unto God the things that are God's". Every human soul is stamped with the image and superscription of God, however blurred and indistinct the lines may have become through the corrosion or attrition of sin; and as unto Caesar should be rendered the coins upon which his effigy appeared, so unto God should be given the souls that bear His image. Render unto the world the stamped pieces that are made legally current by the insignia of worldly powers, and give unto God and His service, yourselves—the divine mintage of His eternal realm. fn

 

Resurrection and Marriage in Heaven

 

Perhaps it was by the invitation of Providence that the contending sects of Judaism, whether religious or political, confronted Jesus in the temple this day to challenge his Messiahship. All in turn manifested their murderous hatred, were confounded and silenced, and affirmed their zealous devotion to the Prince of Darkness. The last of their number to do so were the Sadducees, who came baiting Jesus with a question about the resurrection. The scriptural text is at pains to point out that the Sadducees did not believe in a resurrection, so there could be no doubt about the hypocritical nature of their question. Their purpose was to discredit the doctrine of the resurrection through ludicrous, exaggerated circumstance. "Master," their spokesman said, "Moses said, If a man die, having no children, his brother shall marry his wife, and raise up seed unto his brother." (Matt. 22:24.) Now the dilemma: one after another each of his brothers married his wife and died without issue. The question was, to whom would she be married in the resurrection?

 

Christ made two telling points in response. First, he told the Sadducees that the question they asked was the result of their lack of scriptural understanding. Of their number there would be none that would marry or be given in marriage in the resurrection. This is not to say that others cannot marry or be given in marriage in the resurrected state. fn It is to say simply that those who have refused the proper authority by which such marriages are performed cannot lay claim to such blessings. (D&C 132:15-19.) Then Christ showed them the fallacy of their refusing to believe in a resurrection. The God of Moses, through whom they got the law they professed to believe, announced himself as "the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob." (Matt. 22:32.) Yet Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob were dead. How then could Deity be their God unless they continued to live and unless they would arise in the resurrection?

 

The First Great Commandment

 

The Savior's adversaries had been defeated in each of their encounters with him. Had they been wise, they would have acknowledged their defeat and troubled him no more. But the Pharisees, exulting in the immediate discomfiture of the Sadducees, sought to make yet another attempt to discredit him. Huddling in some corner of the temple ground, they continued to plot, this time choosing the most learned of their number, a lawyer (meaning scribe or doctor of the Mosaic law), to approach Christ and submit what appeared to them a most vexing question. It was reckoned by the rabbis that the law contained 613 precepts—248 statements of duty and 365 prohibitions. As to the relative importance of each, they could argue endlessly. Thus the question, "Master, which is the great commandment in the law?" (Matt. 22:36.) In response, Jesus brushed aside the cobwebs of their debate and turned the attention of his hearers to the foundation upon which the law rested, saying: "Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets." (Matt. 22:37-40.)

 

Again the Pharisees had erred, perhaps in this instance in the choice of a questioner, for he appears to have been a man of integrity. "Well, Master," he responded spontaneously, "thou hast said the truth: for there is one God; and there is none other but he: and to love him with all the heart, and with all the understanding, and with all the soul, and with all the strength, and to love his neighbour as himself, is more than all whole burnt offerings and sacrifices." To this Jesus responded, "Thou art not far from the kingdom of God." (Mark 12:32-34.)

 

Whose Son Is the Christ?

 

It was not enough that all quietly slip away impressed that Jesus of Nazareth was a prophet of great wisdom, for he was more than that: he was the Savior of all mankind, and such testimony needed now to be borne. To call attention to his Messiahship, he turned questioner and asked of the Pharisees, "What think ye of Christ? whose son is he?" (Matt. 22:42.) They responded that he would be the son of David and in so doing they illustrated that they sought a temporal deliverer who would wield David's sword, sit upon David's throne, and do the works of David. Jesus retorted by asking why David by the spirit of prophecy referred to the Messiah as Lord, saying, "The Lord said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, till I make thine enemies thy footstool? If David then call him Lord, how is he his son?" (Matt. 22:44-45; cf. Ps. 110:1.)

 

The issue was clearly set: The scribes said that the Messiah was to be David's son, but David by the power of the Holy Ghost called him Lord. Do we properly give such title to children of our own conception? Why did David do so if he were not testifying that the Son would be divine? Could they understand that through his mother Jesus would claim the throne of David, while through his Father he would claim a far greater throne and a far greater power? Such was his testimony of himself, and so great was the spirit of it and the power of his teachings that we read: "No man was able to answer him a word, neither durst any man from that day forth ask him any more questions." (Matt. 22:46.)

 

The Great Denunciation

 

Addressing himself to the multitude but more specifically to his disciples, Jesus then spoke with great plainness about the damning religious hypocrisy that had been so fully displayed that day. "The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat," he said, and "whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not." (Matt. 23:2-3.) Until the Paschal Lamb had been slain, until Jesus the Christ had offered himself as a sacrifice for all, they were to respect the authority that rested in those who controlled the temple and performed its sacred ordinances.

 

This is a lesson of the greatest magnitude, reminiscent of David's refusal to lift his hand against Saul who sought his life, for Saul was the Lord's anointed (1 Sam. 26:9); the Lord had called him and, notwithstanding his wickedness, it was for the Lord to release him. Yet, though the scribes and Pharisees respected the authority of those sitting in "Moses' seat," the people were not to follow their example, for, as Christ said, "they bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and lay them on men's shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers." (Matt. 23:4.) They were masters of religious pomp, making great display of their supposed righteousness and glorying in the honors of their fellow worshipers. As one cannot be saved in falsehood, so one cannot be edified in following bad examples. All are agents unto themselves, and all will be judged for what they have done or failed to do; none will be excused in works of wickedness on the guise that they mistakenly followed the example of false prophets or the unworthy example of hypocritical religious leaders. Christ further warned against those who exalt themselves, for such, he said, "shall be abased; and he that shall humble himself shall be exalted." (Matt. 23:12.) He then burst forth upon the scribes and Pharisees with eight denunciations, which aptly typify the world of religious hypocrisy. They are as follows:

 

First, he condemned those who "shut up the kingdom of heaven," not qualifying themselves and hindering any that would desire to do so. (Matt. 23:13.) Such are those who rejected Jesus as the Christ and the plan of salvation. Today they are found rejecting the testimony that Joseph Smith is a prophet and opposing the message of the restored gospel.

 

Second, he condemned those who hide their greed and meanness under the cloak of piety. Such, he said, "devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayer." (Matt. 23:14.)

 

Third, he denounced missionaries of false faiths who travel over "land and sea to make one proselyte, and when he is made, [they] make him twofold more the child of hell than [themselves.]" (Matt. 23:15.) There is no salvation in false religion, notwithstanding the enthusiasm of its converts.

 

Fourth, he directed condemnation at those who perfect the art of breaking their bond while appearing sanctimonious. (Matt. 23:16-22.) The word or oath of such is nothing more than bait in games of trickery. They are indeed morally blind.

 

Fifth, he denounced the "blind guides" who subverted eternal truths in their excessive zeal for trifles. Exactness in the performance of outward ordinances supplanted for them even an interest in the inward or spiritual meanings intended behind their ritual. They jealously tended to the rituals that testified and taught of Christ at the same time that they rejected and killed him. (Matt. 23:23-24.) Their modern counterparts can be found praising the Bible while rejecting the spirit of revelation from which it sprang, and using it as the justification to reject the testimony of living prophets.

 

The sixth and seventh woes are essentially the same. Here Christ denounced that which is ceremonially clean, while being filthy within. He aptly used the figure of a whited sepulchre filled with decaying bodies to make his point. Commenting on this imagery Elder Talmage wrote:

 

It was an awful figure, that of likening them to whitewashed tombs, full of dead bones and rotting flesh. As the dogmas of the rabbis made even the slightest contact with a corpse or its cerements, or with the bier upon which it was borne, or the grave in which it had been lain, a cause of personal defilement, which only ceremonial washing and the offering of sacrifices could remove, care was taken to make tombs conspicuously white, so that no person need be defiled through ignorance or proximity to such unclean places; and, moreover, the periodical whitening of sepulchers was regarded as a memorial act of honor to the dead. But even as no amount of care or degree of diligence in keeping bright the outside of a tomb could stay the putrescence going on within, so no externals of pretended righteousness could mitigate the revolting corruption of a heart reeking with iniquity. fn

 

The eighth or final woe, which is the crown to all the others, is that they reject the living prophets while they "garnish the sepulchres of the righteous." (Matt. 23:29.) Indeed, to reject the prophet of any age is to reject those of all ages, for all teach the same truths and bear the same witness.

 

Accountability for Their Ancestors' Sins

 

None can be saved alone and none come to this earth without responsibility to others. That responsibility spans generations; thus we are taught that "we without them [those of past dispensations] cannot be made perfect; neither can they without us be made perfect." (D&C 128:18.) Christ applied this principle to those of his day who would reject and kill the prophets. Upon them, he said, would come "all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias." (Matt. 23:35.) fn Thus they would become "accountable for the sins of their fathers who through ignorance rejected the message of salvation. . . . All these could have been freed from their spirit prison by the men of Jesus' day, if those to whom Jesus then preached had believed his words." fn

 

Jesus Laments over Doomed Jerusalem

 

Christ's teaching in the temple ended with his oft-quoted lament over Jerusalem, the city he loved: "O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not! Behold, your house is left unto you desolate." (Matt. 23:37-38.) "Truly Jerusalem's history is like that of no other place; and truly Jesus with cause, wept because of the rebellion of her children." fn

 

NOTES

 

Joseph F. McConkie is associate professor of ancient scripture at Brigham Young University.

 

Footnotes

 

1. All four Gospel writers give an account of this event. (Matt. 21:1-11; Mark 11:1-11; Luke 19:29-40; John 12:12-19.) Matthew's account has the disciples bringing Christ both a colt and its mother. This is not in harmony with the other accounts and is corrected in the Joseph Smith Translation, Matthew 21:5.

 

2. Adam Clarke, Clarke's Commentary, 3 vols. (Nashville: Abingdon, 1977), 1:268. "The mule was the proper riding beast for the king and his sons (2 Samuel 13:29; 18:9)." George Arthur Buttrick, ed., The Interpreter's Bible, 12 vols. (Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1954), 3:26. See also Judges 5:10; 10:4.

 

3. Even this did not constitute the complete fulfillment of Zechariah's prophecy. His prophecy was one of a kingdom of peace, a day when Ephraim and Judah would again be one, a day when that peace (that is, the gospel message) would cover the earth "from sea even to sea, and from the river even to the ends of the earth." (Zech. 9:10.) We look to a future day when that part of the prophecy not fulfilled in Christ's first coming finds completion in the era of millennial rest.

 

4. Literal fulfillment of this prophecy would come in A.D. 70, when Titus and his Roman legion would lay siege to the city, destroy the temple so that not one stone would be left standing upon another, and take into slavery that remnant of his people who did not suffer death in its siege and destruction. Those of his captives who did not die in bondage would eventually be scattered to the ends of the earth.

 

5. Joseph Fielding McConkie, Gospel Symbolism (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1985), pp. 10-11.

 

6. Bruce R. McConkie, Doctrinal New Testament Commentary, 3 vols. (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1965-73), 1:585. See also JST, Matt. 21:13.

 

7. Bruce R. McConkie, The Mortal Messiah, 4 vols. (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1979-81), 3:356.

 

8. These words were part of the Hallel, which all Jewry chanted in their ceremonies. As such, they were well known to those whom the Savior addressed. A tradition among the Jews held that in the building of the temple, one stone was originally rejected by the builders, who did not know for what purpose it had been quarried. Later it was discovered that it was indeed the chief cornerstone. See J. R. Dummelow, A Commentary on the Holy Bible (New York: Macmillan, 1973), p. 372.

 

9. Joseph Fielding McConkie, Gospel Symbolism, p. 132.

 

10. Clarke's Commentary 3:210.

 

11. Gospel Symbolism, pp. 132-33.

 

12. The Mortal Messiah 3:369-70.

 

13. Jesus the Christ (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1957), pp. 546-47.

 

14. This issue has been confused among Latter-day Saints. Critics of Mormonism have frequently used this passage to discount the principle of eternal marriage. A typical response to this criticism has been to agree that there will be no marriage after the resurrection, for all such matters will be attended to prior to that time. Whether that will be the case or not, we have no way of knowing. We should remember, however, that the first resurrection precedes the millennial era, when it is supposed that such matters will be attended to. This passage does not say that there cannot be marriage in the Millennium or at some subsequent time. It simply states that unbelievers, "Sadducees," be they ancient or modern, cannot be sealed for time and eternity. See Robert L. Millet and Joseph Fielding McConkie, The Life Beyond (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1986), pp. 98-100.

 

15. Jesus the Christ, p. 558.

 

16. Jesus here referred to "Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar." This has been thought to be John the Baptist's father, but this tradition of his death comes from a late Christian apocryphal book. (See Robert L. Millet, "The Birth and Childhood of the Messiah," chapter 8 of this volume, note 20.) The idea also finds expression in Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p. 261, which may not have been written by the Prophet. The Zechariah familiar to Jesus' audience was the son of Jehoiada who rebuked Israel and was stoned "in the court of the house of the Lord." (2 Chr. 24:20-22.) The Hebrew Bible arranged Genesis first and Chronicles last, so Jesus probably gave the first and last martyrs in his testimony to the Jews.

 

17. The Mortal Messiah 3:405.

 

18. Doctrinal New Testament Commentary 1:626.

 

 

(Kent P. Jackson and Robert L. Millet, eds., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 5: The Gospels [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1986], 373.)

 

 

 

(Luke 10:25-28.) – The written word over the oral interpretation.  They interpreted the law incorrectly.  Also, Christ teaches about the 2 great commandments: 1. Love God with all that you have, Deut 6.  2.  Love they neighbor as thyself, Lev 19.   Love God and build up His kingdom, as you put God first your relationship with man will be correct.

 

25 ¶ And, behold, a certain lawyer stood up, and tempted him, saying, Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?

 

26 He said unto him, What is written in the law? how readest thou?

 

27 And he answering said, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbour as thyself.

 

28 And he said unto him, Thou hast answered right: this do, and thou shalt live.

 

The same story is given in Matthew 22:23-34.

 

Pharisees – Jewish culture

Sadducees – Greek culture

 

Christ tells both groups they do err in not knowing the scriptures

 

 

 

 

Signs of the Times

March 22, 2007

 

 

Matthew 23 – The Scribes and Pharisees laid heavy emphasis on the oral interpretations of the written law which became burdensome for the people to bear.  The people followed the Pharisees actions which were for show and ritual; the people could not see the kingdom of God through their actions.  They were blinded to the truth.

 

 

Jesus and the Jewish Rulers

 

The relationship between Jesus and the Jewish rulers was often adversarial. It was inevitable that differences would exist, for Jesus brought the pure doctrine and philosophy of heaven, whereas many of the people and their rulers were saturated in selfishness, materialism, priestcraft, and the pleasures of the flesh. The principle on which this conflict arose is expressed as follows: "And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God." (John 3:19-21.)

 

 Such conflict is not limited to Jesus only, for his true prophets and Apostles always find themselves at variance with the ways and desires of the natural, fallen world of mankind. Such differences began in the premortal life with the rebellion of Lucifer and the war in heaven; and it has continued on the earth to this day. The conflict was especially sharp and visible in the New Testament because Jesus is the purest and greatest

of all men, and the Jews of that particular time and place were among the most wicked of all time (2 Ne. 10:3).

 

The doctrine taught by Jesus called for a higher standard of personal integrity and purity of life than most unrepentant mortals are willing to tolerate. Jesus told those Jews, who regarded themselves as the favorites of heaven, that they were in fact the enemies of the very God they claimed to worship. Since they could neither ignore, nor silence, nor tolerate him, they sought to destroy his influence, and eventually to remove him altogether.

 

It was necessary that Jesus testify of their wickedness so as to give them a chance to repent, and also, in case they persisted, to leave them without excuse on the day of judgment. It was also necessary that Jesus proclaim against the false doctrine and works of the corrupt leaders as a clear message to the people. To have kept silent in the midst of such flagrant corruption and public misdeeds would be to condone the leaders' wicked behavior and send the wrong message to the masses of the people. There were some among the leaders who were favorable to Jesus. Apparently Joseph of Arimathaea, and to some extent Nicodemus, were disciples. There may have been others. Certainly there were some who knew Jesus was right, but who lacked the courage to publicly agree with him. The record indicates, however, that there were a substantial number of the leaders who openly and repeatedly opposed the Savior. The Joseph Smith Translation adds this comment: "And the common people heard him gladly; but the high priest and the elders were offended at him" ([Joseph Smith Translation of the Bible]. The Holy Scriptures: Inspired Version. Independence, Mo.: Herald Publishing House, 1970 Mark 12:44).

 

When wicked persons seek to destroy a righteous prophet, there are several avenues available. Often they attempt to refute his doctrine. When that fails they attack his character. We find the following items with regard to the Jewish rulers and Jesus. These attacks were made primarily during the last two years of his ministry. . .

 

 

The Prophet Joseph Smith said that if Jesus had come to earth and preached the same "rough things" and the "same doctrine" in the Prophet's day as he did to the Jews, that generation too would put him to death (Joseph Fielding Smith, comp. Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith. Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1976, 307, 328). It is noted that while the King James Version is quite clear in depicting Jesus' troubles with the Jewish leaders, the Joseph Smith Translation and the Book of Mormon are even more explicit and pronounced. These later sources give us a more detailed and enhanced concept of the magnitude of the conflict than we could have obtained from the King James Version alone.

 

 

(Robert J. Matthews, Behold the Messiah [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1994], 260.)

 

 

(JST Matthew 23:2-25.) – The condemnation of the leaders who should be teaching the people the true doctrine, Christ teaches what should be done, the oral law does not sanctify

 

2 All, therefore, whatsoever they bid you observe, they will make you observe and do; for they are ministers of the law, and they make themselves your judges. But do not ye after their works; for they say, and do not.

 

3 For they bind heavy burdens and lay on men's shoulders, and they are grievous to be borne; but they will not move them with one of their fingers.

 

4 And all their works they do to be seen of men. They make broad their phylacteries, and enlarge the borders of their garments, and love the uppermost rooms at feasts, and the chief seats in the synagogues, and greetings in the markets, and to be called of men, Rabbi, Rabbi, (which is master.)

 

5 But be not ye called Rabbi; for one is your master, which is Christ; and all ye are brethren.

 

6 And call no one your creator upon the earth, or your heavenly Father; for one is your creator and heavenly Father, even he who is in heaven.

 

7 Neither be ye called masters; for one is your master, even he whom your heavenly Father sent, which is Christ; for he hath sent him among you that ye might have life.

 

8 But he that is greatest among you shall be your servant.

 

9 And whosoever shall exalt himself shall be abased of him; and he that shall humble himself shall be exalted of him.

 

10 But woe unto you, Scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men; for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in.

 

11 Woe unto you, Scribes and Pharisees! for ye are hypocrites! Ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretense make long prayers; therefore ye shall receive the greater punishment.

 

12 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte; and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than he was before, like unto yourselves.

 

13 Woe unto you, blind guides, who say, Whosoever shall swear by the temple, it is nothing; but whosoever shall swear by the gold of the temple, he committeth sin, and is a debtor.

 

14 You are fools and blind; for which is the greater, the gold, or the temple that sanctifieth the gold?

 

15 And ye say, Whosoever sweareth by the altar, it is nothing; but whosoever sweareth by the gift that is upon it, he is guilty.

 

16 O fools, and blind! For which is the greater, the gift, or the altar that sanctifieth the gift?

 

17 Verily I say unto you, Whoso, therefore, sweareth by it, sweareth by the altar, and by all things thereon.

 

18 And whoso shall swear by the temple, sweareth by it, and by him who dwelleth therein.

 

19 And he that shall swear by heaven, sweareth by the throne of God, and by him who sitteth thereon.

 

20 Woe unto you, Scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For ye pay tithe of mint, and anise, and cummin; and have omitted the weightier things of the law; judgment, mercy, and faith; these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone.

 

21 Ye blind guides, who strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel; who make yourselves appear unto men that ye would not commit the least sin, and yet ye yourselves, transgress the whole law.

 

22 Woe unto you, Scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For ye make clean the outside of the cup, and of the platter; but within they are full of extortion and excess.

 

23 Ye blind Pharisees! Cleanse first the cup and platter within, that the outside of them may be clean also.

 

24 Woe unto you, Scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For ye are like unto whited sepulchers, which indeed appear beautiful outwardly, but are within full of the bones of the dead, and of all uncleanness.

 

25 Even so, ye also outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within ye are full of hypocrisy and iniquity.

 

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 88:20-22.) – The law God has given is to help people to become sanctified, dedicated and consecrated.

 

20 That bodies who are of the celestial kingdom may possess it forever and ever; for, for this intent was it made and created, and for this intent are they sanctified.

 

21 And they who are not sanctified through the law which I have given unto you, even the law of Christ, must inherit another kingdom, even that of a terrestrial kingdom, or that of a telestial kingdom.

 

22 For he who is not able to abide the law of a celestial kingdom cannot abide a celestial glory.

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 88:68.) – Sanctify ourselves that our minds become single to God

 

68 Therefore, sanctify yourselves that your minds become single to God, and the days will come that you shall see him; for he will unveil his face unto you, and it shall be in his own time, and in his own way, and according to his own will.

 

 

The Do’s and Don’ts do not sanctify because they are not the law.  The Holy Ghost sanctifies, keeping the law gives us access to the Holy Ghost, understand the doctrine behind the principle.

 

(Matthew 23:37, 39.) – Reference to the parable of the wicked husbandman, verse 39 is a reference to the 2nd coming.

 

37 O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!

 

39 For I say unto you, Ye shall not see me henceforth, till ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.

 

D&C 45:16-61 = Matthew 24-25 along with JST Matthew, read the Lord’s revelation to understand the New Testament part of Matthew 24-25.

 

Doctrine and Covenants 45:11-12. The revelation recorded in Doctrine and Covenants 45 was received in Kirtland, Ohio, on 7 March 1831. Reference is again made to the great patriarch Enoch and his righteous city who were "separated from the earth" (translated) and "received unto" the Lord. Because neither the King James Version nor any other known Bible has the slightest reference to Enoch having a city or that such a city ever existed on earth or was translated, this passage is a direct reference to the revelation concerning Enoch that was received in December 1830 at Fayette as part of the Joseph Smith Translation.

 

New Testament Translation

 

Doctrine and Covenants 45:60-62. During the course of the revelation recorded in Doctrine and Covenants 45, the Lord reviewed scenes and teachings he had given to the Twelve on the Mount of Olives eighteen hundred years earlier, some of which are recorded in the New Testament. Until this date, 7 March 1831, the Prophet and his scribes had translated only from the early chapters of Genesis. In this revelation the Lord instructed them to begin to translate the New Testament. He gave them the promise that in it (the translation they would make of the New Testament) many important things would be made known to them. Thus we see that the process of translation was a learning and revelatory experience. There can be no mistaking these words: "Wherefore, I give unto you that ye may now translate it [the New Testament], that ye may be prepared for the things to come." The original draft of Joseph Smith's translation of the New Testament shows that the Prophet began translating the book of Matthew the next day, 8 March 1831. The handwriting is Sidney Rigdon's. The first sentence reads: "A translation of the New Testament translated by the power of God." The pages that follow have no chapters or verses and very little punctuation.

 

Scholars who have devoted a great amount of time and effort in studying the surviving biblical texts and languages sometimes hesitate to view the Joseph Smith Translation as even a partial restoration of what was written originally in the Bible. Because there are no known original documents of the Bible now available, there is no easy comparison.

 

Nevertheless, no one would say that the Lord could not reveal the original text. We learn from 1 Nephi 13:24 through 40 and from Moses 1:40 and 41 that plain and precious parts would be taken out, lost, held back, and removed from the biblical text—but that these things would be restored. These passages seem to speak not only of a loss of meaning but also of a loss of text (1 Nephi 13:28, 29, 32, 34, 40, and Moses 1:41). The language of these passages seems to mean that actual parts have been taken out of the book of the Jews, which is the Bible.

 

It is instructive to notice that part of Doctrine and Covenants 45 declares itself to be a repetition of a conversation that Jesus held with the Twelve on the Mount of Olives. Note these words of Jesus to Joseph Smith as recorded in verse 16: "And I will show it plainly as I showed it unto my disciples as I stood before them in the flesh, and spoke unto them, saying: As ye have asked me . . . " The tenor of these words leaves no doubt that Jesus Christ is telling Joseph Smith in the nineteenth century the same things he had told the earlier disciples in the first century—recreating the same scenes from the Mount of Olives, even to the same conversation. It isn't just a similar sermon; it is a reissue of a conversation held nineteen hundred years earlier (D&C 45:15-59).

 

If the Lord can and did restore one such event, he could and no doubt would do so with other events. Although not every word in the Joseph Smith Translation is necessarily restored text, yet we ought to allow for that kind of revelatory process and hold to the concept that the Joseph Smith Translation is at the least a restoration of original meaning, doctrinal content, and also of text if necessary.

 

 

(Leon R. Hartshorn, Dennis A. Wright, and Craig J. Ostler, eds., The Doctrine and Covenants, a Book of Answers: The 25th Annual Sidney B. Sperry Symposium [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1996], 41.)

 

 

Admonitions for the Priesthood of God

President Harold B. Lee

I have some thoughts—notes that I thought I might be prompted to use tonight. So, if the Lord is willing, I should like to talk to you now for a few minutes in this great conference.

I had a lesson years ago as to the greatness of priesthood. It had to do with the call of the First Presidency for me to come to their office on a day that I shall never forget—April 20, 1935. I was city commissioner in Salt Lake City. I was a stake president.

We had been wrestling with this question of welfare. There were few government work programs; the finances of the Church were low; we were told that there wasn’t much that could be done so far as the finances of the Church were concerned. And here we were with 4,800 of our 7,300 people who were wholly or partially dependent. We had only one place to go, and that was to apply the Lord’s program as set forth in the revelations.

It was from our humble efforts that the First Presidency, knowing that we had had some experience, called me one morning asking if I would come to their office. It was Saturday morning; there were no calls on their calendar, and for hours in that forenoon they talked with me and told me that they wanted me to resign from the city commission, and they would release me from being stake president; that they wished me now to head up the welfare movement to turn the tide from government relief, direct relief, and help to put the Church in a position where it could take care of its own needy.

After that morning I rode in my car (spring was just breaking) up to the head of City Creek Canyon into what was then called Rotary Park; and there, all by myself, I offered one of the most humble prayers of my life.

There I was, just a young man in my thirties. My experience had been limited. I was born in a little country town in Idaho. I had hardly been outside the boundaries of the states of Utah and Idaho. And now to put me in a position where I was to reach out to the entire membership of the Church, worldwide, was one of the most staggering contemplations that I could imagine. How could I do it with my limited understanding?

As I kneeled down, my petition was, “What kind of an organization should be set up in order to accomplish what the Presidency has assigned?” And there came to me on that glorious morning one of the most heavenly realizations of the power of the priesthood of God. It was as though something were saying to me, “There is no new organization necessary to take care of the needs of this people. All that is necessary is to put the priesthood of God to work. There is nothing else that you need as a substitute.”

With that understanding, then, and with the simple application of the power of the priesthood, the welfare program has gone forward now by leaps and bounds, overcoming obstacles that seemed impossible, until now it stands as a monument to the power of the priesthood, the like of which I could only glimpse in those days to which I have made reference.

Now, with that understanding of priesthood power, let me speak of a few other matters that have come to my mind tonight.

There are two scriptures I would have you think of as applicable today as they were in the period following the advent of the Savior in the meridian of time in the post-apostolic period. In the Acts of the Apostles, the apostle Paul gave these charges to the elders of Israel. He said:

“Take heed therefore unto yourselves, and to all the flock, over which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers, to feed the church of God. …  

“For I know this, that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock.

“Also of your own selves shall men arise, speaking perverse things, to draw away disciples after them.” (Acts 20:28–30.)

And then the apostle Paul wrote to the Galatians:

“I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel:

“Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.

“But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.

“As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.

“For … I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man.

“For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ.” (Gal. 1:6–12.)

Today those warnings are just as applicable as they were in that day in which they were given.

There are some as wolves among us. By that, I mean some who profess membership in this church who are not sparing the flock. And among our own membership, men are arising speaking perverse things. Now perverse means diverting from the right or correct, and being obstinate in the wrong, willfully, in order to draw the weak and unwary members of the Church away after them.

And as the apostle Paul said, it is likewise a marvel to us today, as it was in that day, that some members are so soon removed from those who taught them the gospel and are removed from the true teachings of the gospel of Christ to be led astray into something that corrupts the true doctrines of the gospel of Christ into vicious and wicked practices and performances.

These, as have been evidenced by shocking events among some of these splinter groups, have been accursed, as the prophets warned; and they are obviously in the power of that evil one who feeds the gullible with all the sophistries which Satan has employed since the beginning of time.

I should like now to make reference to some of these. The first is the spread of rumor and gossip (we have mentioned this before) which, when once started, gains momentum as each telling becomes more fanciful, until unwittingly those who wish to dwell on the sensational repeat them in firesides, in classes, in Relief Society gatherings and priesthood quorum classes without first verifying the source before becoming a party to causing speculation and discussions that steal time away from the things that would be profitable and beneficial and enlightening to their souls.

Just an example: I understand that there is a widely circulated story that I was alleged to have had a patriarchal blessing (I don’t know whether any of you have heard about that) that had to do with the coming of the Savior and the ten tribes of Israel.

In the first place, a patriarchal blessing is a sacred document to the person who has received it and is never given for publication and, as all patriarchal blessings, should be kept as a private possession to the one who has received it.

And second, with reference to that which I was alleged to have had, suffice it to say that such a quotation is incorrect and without foundation in fact.

There is one thing that shocks me: I have learned, in some instances, that those who have heard of these rumors are disappointed when I tell them they are not so. They seem to have enjoyed believing a rumor without substance of fact. I would earnestly urge that no such idle gossip be spread abroad without making certain as to whether or not it is true.

The First Presidency in August 1913 issued a warning to the members of the Church which could bear repeating today. Let me read you a few things that were said then:

“To the officers and members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints:

“From the days of Hiram Page (Doc. and Cov., Sec. 28) [D&C 28], at different periods there have been manifestations from delusive spirits to members of the Church. Sometimes these have come to men and women who because of transgression became easy prey to the Arch-Deceiver. At other times people who pride themselves on their strict observance of the rules and ordinances and ceremonies of the Church are led astray by false spirits, who exercise an influence so imitative of that which proceeds from at Divine source that even these persons, who think they are ‘the very elect,’ find it difficult to discern the essential difference. Satan himself has transformed himself to be apparently ‘an angel of light.’

“When visions, dreams, tongues, prophecy, impressions or an extraordinary gift or inspiration convey something out of harmony with the accepted revelations of the Church or contrary to the decisions of its constituted authorities, Latter-day Saints may know that it is not of God, no matter how plausible it may appear. Also, they should understand that directions for the guidance of the Church will come, by revelation, through the head. All faithful members are entitled to the inspiration of the Holy Spirit for themselves, their families, and for those over whom they are appointed and ordained to preside. But anything at discord with that which comes from God through the head of the Church is not to be received as authoritative or reliable. In secular as well as spiritual affairs, Saints may receive Divine guidance and revelation affecting themselves, but this does not convey authority to direct others, and is not to be accepted when contrary to Church covenants, doctrine or discipline, or to known facts, demonstrated truths, or good common sense. No person has the right to induce his fellow members of the Church to engage in speculations or take stock in ventures of any kind on the specious claim of Divine revelation or vision or dream, especially when it is in opposition to the voice of recognized authority, local or general. The Lord’s Church ‘is a house of order.’ It is not governed by individual gifts or manifestations, but by the order and power of the Holy Priesthood as sustained by the voice and vote of the Church in its appointed conferences.

“The history of the Church records many pretended revelations claimed by impostors or zealots who believed in the manifestations they sought to lead other persons to accept, and in every instance, disappointment, sorrow and disaster have resulted therefrom. Financial loss and sometimes utter ruin have followed.”

This is something that is recurring time and time again, and we call upon you holders of the priesthood to stamp out any such and to set to flight all such things as are creeping in, people rising up here and there who have had some “marvelous” kind of a manifestation, as they claim, and who try to lead the people in a course that has not been dictated from the heads of the Church.

As I say, it never ceases to amaze me how gullible some of our Church members are in broadcasting these sensational stories, or dreams, or visions, some alleged to have been given to Church leaders, past or present, supposedly from some person’s private diary, without first verifying the report with proper Church authorities.

If our people want to be safely guided during these troublous times of deceit and false rumors, they must follow their leaders and seek for the guidance of the Spirit of the Lord in order to avoid falling prey to clever manipulators who, with cunning sophistry, seek to draw attention and gain a following to serve their own notions and sometimes sinister motives.

The Lord has very plainly set forth a test by which anyone may challenge any and all who may come claiming, clandestinely, to have received some kind of priesthood authority. Now this is what the Lord said in the 42nd section of the Doctrine and Covenants, verse 11:

“Again, I say unto you, that it shall not be given to any one to go forth to preach my gospel, or to build up my church, except he be ordained by someone who has authority, and it is known to the church that he has authority and has been regularly ordained by the heads of the church.” [D&C 42:11]

Now, if one comes claiming that he has authority, ask him, “Where do you get your authority? Have you been ordained by someone who has authority, who is known to the Church, that you have authority and have been regularly ordained by the heads of the Church?” If the answer is no, you may know that he is an imposter. This is the test that our people should always apply when some imposter comes trying to lead them astray.

Now there is another danger that confronts us. There seem to be those among us who are as wolves among the flock, trying to lead some who are weak and unwary among Church members, according to reports that have reached us, who are taking the law into their own hands by refusing to pay their income tax because they have some political disagreement with constituted authorities.

Others have tried to marshal civilians, without police authority, and to arm themselves to battle against possible dangers, little realizing that in so doing they themselves become the ones who, by obstructing the constituted authority, would become subject to arrest and imprisonment.

We have even heard of someone claiming Church membership in protest against pornographic pictures being displayed in theaters, having planted bombs, and therefore becoming subject to punishment by the law and subsequently standing judgment before the disciplinary bodies of the Church.

While we must stand solidly behind those who are trying to stamp out the filthy and provocative display of so-called pornographic materials, we have but one answer to all those who thus take such radical measures, and this is the word of the Lord:

“Let no man think he is ruler; but let God rule him that judgeth, according to the counsel of his own will, or, in other words, him that counseleth or sitteth upon the judgment seat.

“Let no man break the laws of the land … until he reigns whose right it is to reign, and subdues all enemies under his feet.” (D&C 58:20–22.)

I want to warn this great body of priesthood against that great sin of Sodom and Gomorrah, which has been labeled as a sin second only in seriousness to the sin of murder. I speak of the sin of adultery, which, as you know, was the name used by the Master as he referred to unlicensed sexual sins of fornication as well as adultery; and besides this, the equally grievous sin of homosexuality, which seems to be gaining momentum with social acceptance in the Babylon of the world, of which Church members must not be a part.

While we are in the world, we must not be of the world. Any attempts being made by the schools or places of entertainment to flaunt sexual perversions, which can do nothing but excite to experimentation, must find among the priesthood in this church a vigorous and unrelenting defense through every lawful means that can be employed.

The common judges of Israel, our bishops and stake presidents, must not stand by and fail to apply disciplinary measures within their jurisdiction, as set forth plainly in the laws of the Lord and procedures as set forth in plain and simple instructions that cannot be misunderstood. Never must we allow supposed mercy to the unrepentant sinner to rob the justice upon which true repentance from sinful practices is predicated.

One more matter: There are among us many loose writings predicting the calamities which are about to overtake us. Some of these have been publicized as though they were necessary to wake up the world to the horrors about to overtake us. Many of these are from sources upon which there cannot be unquestioned reliance.

Are you priesthood bearers aware of the fact that we need no such publications to be forewarned, if we were only conversant with what the scriptures have already spoken to us in plainness?

Let me give you the sure word of prophecy on which you should rely for your guide instead of these strange sources which may have great political implications.

Read the 24th chapter of Matthew—particularly that inspired version as contained in the Pearl of Great Price. (JS—M 1.)

Then read the 45th section of the Doctrine and Covenants where the Lord, not man, has documented the signs of the times. [D&C 45]

Now turn to section 101 and section 133 of the Doctrine and Covenants and hear the step-by-step recounting of events leading up to the coming of the Savior. [D&C 101; D&C 133]

Finally, turn to the promises the Lord makes to those who keep the commandments when these judgments descend upon the wicked, as set forth in the Doctrine and Covenants, section 38. [D&C 38]

Brethren, these are some of the writings with which you should concern yourselves, rather than commentaries that may come from those whose information may not be the most reliable and whose motives may be subject to question. And may I say, parenthetically, most of such writers are not handicapped by having any authentic information on their writings.

As the Lord has admonished priesthood bearers from the beginning: “Wherefore, gird up your loins and be prepared. Behold, the kingdom is yours, and the enemy shall not overcome.

“Verily I say unto you, ye are clean, but not all; and there is none else with whom I am well pleased;

“For all flesh is corrupted before me; and the powers of darkness prevail upon the earth, among the children of men, in the presence of all the hosts of heaven—

“Which causeth silence to reign, and all eternity is pained. …” (D&C 38:9–12.)

Now brethren, I have spoken plainly to you in this priesthood session. Let what has been said by all the brethren tonight, and in this conference, not fall on deaf ears. Let these admonitions be received as the Lord directed they should be received, in an early revelation, to which President Tanner has already made reference, “as if from mine own mouth, in all patience and faith.” (D&C 21:5.)

Only by so doing can we be truly one as a body of priesthood, by following the leadership that the Lord has established in our day in order that we may be one. And he warns us if we are not one, we are not his, as he has declared in the Doctrine and Covenants.

There are one or two things I should like to say about myself and this present responsibility. Never had I thought of myself as one day becoming the President of the Church. As a boy in my rural community, I used to hear the brethren talk about a “pillar” in the Church. I wondered what in the world it meant. It must be something great to be a pillar in the Church. Well, now, maybe I am beginning to realize something about what that means, but I know this: those who try to guess ahead of time as to who is going to be the next President of the Church are just gambling as they might be on a horse race, because only the Lord has the time table.

I remember one time Elder Charles A. Callis in a Council of the Twelve meeting. There was a rather spirited discussion on some questions. One of the Brethren said, “You had better listen to Brother George Albert Smith, the President of the Twelve, because he may be the next President of the Church.”

Brother Callis smiled and said, “Oh, I wouldn’t be too sure. Three times in my life I have chosen the next President of the Church, and all three of them died before they came to the presidency.” The Lord only knows, and for us to speculate or to presume is not pleasing in the sight of the Lord.

I have one other thought I should like to express. Brigham Young was a great defender of the Prophet Joseph Smith. There were Judases in the ranks in that day, just as there were in the Savior’s day, and just as we have today, some who are members of the Church who are undercutting us, who are betraying their trusts. We are shocked when we see the places from which some of these things come.

Brigham Young was invited by some of these men who were trying to depose the Prophet Joseph from his position as President of the Church; but they made a mistake by inviting President Brigham Young into their circle. And after he had listened to what their motives were, he said something to this effect: “I want to say something to you men. You cannot destroy the appointment of a prophet of God, but you can cut the thread that binds you to the prophet of God, and sink yourselves to hell.”

There was a pugilist there by the name of Jacob Bump, so the story goes, who doubled up his fists and started toward President Young, who replied to this man’s threats: “I would like to lay hands on a man like you in defense of the Prophet Joseph Smith.”

Remember that, brethren. You cannot destroy the appointments of the prophets of God. The Lord knows whom he wants to preside in his church, and sometimes it takes a lot of practicing, guiding, testing, before he may know whether or not one of us is prepared for the present assignment.

Now I think it is folly for one to compare one President of the Church with another. No one takes the place of another President of the Church. Each President has his own place. I had a lesson taught me some years ago when, in company with one of the brethren, I had reorganized the presidency of the Ensign Stake. We had named the bishop of one of the wards as stake president. It was near the end of the year, and he elected to remain as bishop, along with his first counselor, who was a bishop, until they had closed the books at the end of the year.

Six weeks after they were sustained, the stake president suddenly passed away.

Then I began to receive a barrage of letters. Where in the world was the inspiration for you to call a man whom the Lord was going to let die in six weeks? They invited me to talk at his services, and some seemed to be expecting me to try to explain why I had appointed a man that the Lord was going to take home in six weeks.

President Joseph Fielding Smith sat on the stand and heard my attempt to satisfy these people, and he said to me, “Don’t you let that bother you. If you have called a man to a position in this church and he dies the next day, that position would have a bearing on what he will be called to do when he leaves this earth.”

I believe that. I believe that every President of this church, every apostle of this church, every bishop, every stake president, every presiding position will have a bearing on what one is called to do when he leaves this earth.

And so, when you think of one President taking the place of another, he doesn’t. That President maintains his own place. We shouldn’t try to compare one as being greater than this one or greater than the other, because each one is, in the eyes of the Lord, in his own time the one most needed for that particular time. You may be sure of that.

Now, just one final thought. I sat in a class in Sunday School in my own ward one day, and the teacher was the son of a patriarch. He said he used to take down the blessings of his father, and he noticed that his father gave what he called “iffy” blessings. He would give a blessing, but it was predicated on “if you will not do this” or “if you will cease doing that.” And he said, “I watched these men to whom my father gave the ‘iffy’ blessings, and I saw that many of them did not heed the warning that my father as a patriarch had given, and the blessings were never received because they did not comply.”

You know, this started me thinking. I went back into the Doctrine and Covenants and began to read the “iffy” revelations that have been given to the various brethren in the Church. If you want to have an exercise in something that will startle you, read some of the warnings that were given through the Prophet Joseph Smith to Thomas B. Marsh, Martin Harris, some of the Whitmer brothers, William E. McLellin—warnings which, had they heeded, some would not have fallen by the wayside. But because they did not heed, and they didn’t clear up their lives, they fell by the wayside, and some had to be dropped from membership in the Church.

Now, there is one thing that I think we should all be mindful of. I was with a group of missionaries in the temple one day. A question was asked by one of the sisters about the Word of Wisdom, concerning the promise made that if one would keep the Word of Wisdom he should run and not be weary and should walk and not faint. And she said, “How could that promise be realized if a person were crippled? How could he receive the blessing that he could run and not be weary, and walk and not faint, if he were crippled?”

I answered her, “Did you ever doubt the Lord? The Lord said that.”

The trouble with us today, there are too many of us who put question marks instead of periods after what the Lord says. I want you to think about that. We shouldn’t be concerned about why he said something, or whether or not it can be made so. Just trust the Lord. We don’t try to find the answers or explanations. We shouldn’t try to spend time explaining what the Lord didn’t see fit to explain. We spend useless time.

If you would teach our people to put periods and not question marks after what the Lord has declared, we would say, “It is enough for me to know that is what the Lord said.”

Elder Gordon B. Hinckley told a story after going into Vietnam that to me was a great lesson. There was a young man, as I remember it, who was in the military service in Vietnam and who joined the Church and was now about to go back to his home country in Southeast Asia.

Brother Hinckley said to him, “What is it going to do to you when you get back home now that you have joined the Church?”

“Oh,” said the youth, “I will be cast out. My family will disown me. I will have difficulty in school. I will have no military rank.”

Elder Hinckley then asked, “Isn’t that a pretty big price to pay?”

And this young man looked at Elder Hinckley and said, “Well, the gospel is true, isn’t it?”

That was a soul-searching question for Brother Hinckley, who replied: “Yes, my boy, with all my soul, the gospel is true.”

And then this young man said, “Well, what else matters then?”

Brethren of the priesthood, if the gospel of Jesus Christ is true—and it is true—what else matters? The Lord may bless us with that rock-bottom testimony that will guide us through all the perils of life if we will just continue to say to ourselves, “Because I know that the gospel is true, nothing else matters.”

I bear you my solemn witness that it is true, that the Lord is in his heavens; he is closer to us than you have any idea. You ask when the Lord gave the last revelation to this church. The Lord is giving revelations day by day, and you will witness and look back on this period and see some of the mighty revelations the Lord has given in your day and time. To that I bear you my witness, and leave with you my testimony this night, in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ. Amen.

What to read and study to understand the Signs of the Times;

 

  1. JS Matthew 24-25 – A rewording of Matthew 24-25, sequence of events
  2. Doctrine and Covenants 45:16-61 – Further information on Matthew 24
  3. Doctrine and Covenants 101, 133 – Events of the 2nd Coming
  4. Doctrine and Covenants 29, 43, 77, and 88 – Additional information, but not step by step
  5. Doctrine and Covenants 38 - Promises

 

 

 

(Joseph Smith-Matthew: 4.) – The Apostles asked the Lord 2 questions.  Verses 5-20 answered the 1st question.  Verses 21-48 answered the 2nd question

 

4 And Jesus left them, and went upon the Mount of Olives. And as he sat upon the Mount of Olives, the disciples came unto him privately, saying: Tell us when shall these things be which thou hast said concerning the destruction of the temple, and the Jews; and what is the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world, or the destruction of the wicked, which is the end of the world?

 

 

1st Question – verses 5-20 – Destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD

 

2nd Question – verses 21-48 – Signs of the 2nd Coming and the destruction of the world

 

(Joseph Smith-Matthew: 12.) – The Holy Place was not the Temple since it would be destroyed.  Saints left in 67AD to the city of Pella.  The destruction in 70 AD was much worse then the Babylonian destruction centuries earlier.

 

12 When you, therefore, shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, concerning the destruction of Jerusalem, then you shall stand in the holy place; whoso readeth let him understand.

Jerusalem in Revolt, A.D. 66-70

 

The Essenes of Qumran represented one kind of pious response to the problems in Jerusalem during the two centuries before the meridian of time. The Qumran sectarians regarded the problems as severe, though largely internal in origin, and stemming from apostasy. But other difficulties emerged with Roman domination from 63 B.C. onward. In response to the economic oppression and political tyranny imposed upon Jerusalem and Judaea, a group of men arose who would not withdraw from society and sequester themselves away until the advent of a great messianic age brought an end to their misery. Rather, they fought openly against the political and military enemies of an independent Israel. Traditionally this sect, called Zealots, has been viewed as a group of ardent patriots who combined an intense love of their country with a devotion to Torah and who were ready to fight and die for both. fn Unfortunately, the movement also gathered to it those whose motives were less pure.

 

Josephus traces the origins of the Zealot sect to a man from the northern region of the Holy Land, the Galilee, an area which was known as a hotbed of Jewish revolt. After the death of Herod the Great in 4 B.C. tumults broke out against the Romans near Sepphoris in Galilee. fn They were led by Judas, son of Hezekiah, from the northern city of Gamala. fn The rebellion was put down with bloodshed by Herod's son and successor in Judaea, Archelaus (4 B.C.-A.D.6). But ten years later Judas reemerged as "Judas the Galilean." In A.D. 6 the Romans decided to make Judaea and related territories into a province. They appointed Coponius as procurator and ordered a census of people and property. Josephus states that the new sect was established at that point, when Judas the Galilean incited the people to revolt. fn We learn from Josephus that Judas the Galilean was not alone in his encouragement of his fellow countrymen to oppose direct Roman rule. A Pharisee named Sadduc joined Judas in leading the revolt and founding the sect:

 

For Judas and Sadduc, who excited a fourth philosophic sect among us, and had a great many followers therein, filled our civil government with tumults at present, and laid the foundation of our future miseries, by this system of philosophy, which we were before unacquainted withal; . . . the infection which spread thence among the younger sort, who were zealous for it, brought the public to destruction. fn

 

Josephus refers to the new sect as Judaism's "fourth philosophy" to distinguish it from the other three—the Pharisees, Sadducees, and Essenes. fn Significantly, he indicates that the movement was responsible in some fundamental way for the later downfall of the Jewish state.

 

Apart from the three years in which Herod's grandson Agrippa I (A.D. 41-44) ruled as king in Judaea, the country was governed by a succession of Roman praefects and procurators from A.D. 6 to 66. Jewish discontent increased during this period until it found its most dangerous expression in the activities of the Zealots, who regarded the rule of the Romans as intolerable. In the beginning the Zealots were essentially zealous for God, believing themselves to be "agents of his wrath against the idolatrous ways of the heathen." fn Judas the Galilean taught his followers that "Heaven would be their zealous help to no lesser end than the furthering of their enterprize until it succeeded." fn But the sect did not remain unified. Several groups emerged in Judaea under the guise of freedom fighters, but they were little different from common thieves, brigands, and robbers. In the end, by the time Roman military might had destroyed Jerusalem and its Temple, the Zealot sect had deteriorated into competing factions, each pursuing its own ends.

 

Most Jews probably regarded the Roman governors as idolaters, as indeed, they were. They were also, for the most part, both brutal and greedy, seeking to amass quick wealth and not above misusing their considerable powers for selfish purposes. They shuttled between their official headquarters in Caesarea on the coast and Jerusalem in the Judaean mountains because their constant presence in the Holy City would have antagonized the Jews there.

 

Against the backdrop of growing unrest in Judaea, Jerusalem remained relatively stable and free from revolutionary uprisings during the period from 4 B.C. to about A.D. 55. There were probably several reasons. First, the memory of failed revolts to the north in 4 B.C. and A.D. 6 likely discouraged revolutionary activity. Second, the founding rulers of the Roman Empire, Augustus (27 B.C.-A.D. 14) and Tiberius (A.D. 14-37), were perceived as being favorably disposed toward the Jews and thus promoters of an underlying toleration. Third, when Roman officials did act offensively, the Jews of Jerusalem pursued nonrevolutionary ways to deal with the matter. fn

 

Fourth, even though tensions were mounting, Jerusalem remained relatively quiet on account of the influence of strong high priests, most of whom, until A.D. 44, came from the family of Annas. fn Beginning in A.D. 6 the high priest again became the political head of state. Appointed by the Roman governor, fn the high priest was chosen from a small elite of Jerusalem families among whom the high priestly office was hereditary. These families were the nucleus of the governing aristocracy in Israel. The high priest in this period supervised and officiated at Temple rituals and as head of the Sanhedrin was responsible to the Romans for administration of Jewish affairs. fn

 

Fifth, Jerusalem remained free of bloody revolution for half a century because the Pharisees generally did not support it—Sadduc, the associate of Judas the Galilean, notwithstanding. It will be remembered that the Pharisees were separatists—they saw themselves and Israel as a people set apart for obedience to the Lord. They advocated putting the whole of life under the control of the Law, urging all Jews to carry out the purity regulations originally prescribed in the Torah only for priests functioning in the Temple. The Pharisees viewed all of Israel as a "kingdom of priests" (Ex. 19:6). Most of the time, they were concerned with matters of state only when religious practices were affected. As long as they and all other Jews were free to pursue the Law of God, it made little difference to them what government was in power.

 

Sixth, and finally, there seems to have been a general desire among Jews of Jerusalem to accommodate themselves to "equitable" Roman officers in their provincial arrangement. fn Influenced by the Pharisees, some may actually have welcomed direct Roman rule after A.D. 6, with the idea that it would bring the Jews greater autonomy than they had had under the Herodian vassal kings. fn

 

Prelude to War

 

The progressive deterioration of the relationship between the Jews and the Romans after A.D. 48 is shown in the writings of Josephus. He gives a brief notice from the procuratorship of Tiberius Alexander (A.D. 46-48) about the family of Judas the Galilean: "The sons of Judas of Galilee were now slain; I mean of that Judas who caused the people to revolt, when Cyrenius came to take an account of the estates of the Jews, as we have shewn in a foregoing book. The names of those sons were James and Simon, whom Alexander commanded to be crucified." fn

 

We know nothing of the activities of Judas' sons before this incident. James and Simon may have been quite young in A.D. 6. or they may have just been emerging at the time of Tiberius Alexander to initiate renewed resistance to Rome. Their executions occurred a few years before revolutionary activity really picked up. In his narrative of the later period, Josephus implies that a dynasty of family leaders dedicated to the ideals of revolution had developed between A.D. 6 and 66. Menahem, who took over the siege of the palace in Jerusalem at the opening of the great revolt in A.D. 66, was a son of Judas. fn Eleazar, son of Jairus, who fled to Masada, was also a descendant of Judas. fn Therefore, though Josephus tells us nothing specific about the Zealots or their activities for the six decades after the revolt of A.D. 6, certainly they did not cease to exist. Jesus had one of their number among his associates in the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles (Simon, called Zelotes; see Luke 6:15). At any rate, James and Simon were crucified apparently without any immediate effect upon the peace of Judaea.

 

But peace did not last long. Events during the procuratorship of Cumanus (A.D. 48-52) led to armed clashes between Jews and Romans, and, tragically, between Jews and Jews. The first incident occurred in Jerusalem at the Feast of Passover when one of the Roman soldiers standing on the roof of the Temple portico bared his private parts and gestured obscenely to the multitude. The Jews worshipping below were deeply incensed at this blasphemous affront to God. The crowd demanded that Cumanus punish the soldier, when some "seditious persons" threw stones at the troops. Cumanus, fearing a riot, responded by calling up reinforcements. The troops did not attack, but many Jews were crushed in the ensuing panic and flight from the Temple precinct. fn

 

National mourning over these deaths had hardly ceased when a group of seditious Jews plundered the caravan of a Roman imperial official on the road to Jerusalem near Beth-Horon in Judaea. During the course of punishing nearby villages assumed to have been involved in the attack, a copy of the Torah was torn and burned by a Roman soldier. Outraged Jews from all over the country rushed to Cumanus to demand punishment of the soldier. Eventually the procurator, probably in fear of an all-out rebellion, had the offending soldier beheaded. fn This was the last act of passive resistance against Rome recounted in the narratives of Josephus. fn

 

With Jewish frustration intensifying, the atmosphere throughout the villages in the Holy Land became volatile. Some Galilean Jews on their way to Jerusalem for the Feast of Tabernacles were attacked by Samaritans at a village called Gema, and one of the Jews was killed. The Galilean leaders went to Cumanus, asking that he punish the murderers at once. But the procurator, busy with other matters, neglected their petitions. When masses of Jews at the feast in Jerusalem heard of the murder, being tired of Roman inaction and insensitivity, they marched out of the city to Samaria where they burned several villages and killed the inhabitants. Roman retribution was swift. Cumanus took his troops, armed the Samaritans, and killed some members of the pillaging intruders while taking others prisoner. The rulers of Jerusalem, Josephus says, begged for the rest of the multitude to disperse so that the Romans would not retaliate in the Holy City as well. fn

 

Complete disaster was averted that time as the Jews complied and returned home. But Josephus indicates that from that time forth active insurrection against the Romans became widespread: "The Jews complied with these persuasions of theirs, and dispersed themselves; but still there were a great number who betook themselves to robbing, in hopes of impunity; and rapines and insurrections of the bolder sort happened over the whole country." fn "And after this time all Judea was overrun with robberies [or, infested with bands of brigands]." fn

 

This disorder in the countryside went from bad to worse during the tenure of the next procurator, Felix (A.D. 52-60). He was ill-prepared for his governmental post; corruption of both his public and his private life as well as ineffectiveness plagued his administration and made him offensive to the Jews. fn An example of this corruption is found in Acts 24:24-27, which recounts Felix's attempt to extort a bribe from Paul, who was under house arrest at Caesarea. During the time of Felix a new group began to disrupt life in Judaea and Jerusalem. Called Sicarii, they got their name from their use of a dagger (Latin, sica) for assassinations, and they initiated many acts of general plunder as well as opposing Jewish cooperation with the Romans. fn Though the Sicarii hated the Roman leaders, they did not refrain from following their example in accepting bribes, plundering, murdering to get gain, and the like.

 

The last three procurators—Festus (A.D. 60-62), Albinus (A.D. 62-64), and Florus (A.D. 64-66)—worsened the already chaotic situation and reflected the corruption of the Roman emperor himself, Nero (A.D. 54-68). Albinus stole public and private funds, accepted bribes to release brigands, and emptied the prisons of all but the worst criminals. fn Revolutionary activity in the Judaean countryside was widespread. The utter absence of authority in the land and the offensive actions of the Romans outraged the ordinary Jewish citizen and gave incentive to robbers and Sicarii to wreak havoc at will. fn

 

Dissension in Jerusalem

 

The unrest and disorder in the countryside of Judaea, which began late in the procuratorship of Cumanus (A.D. 48-52) ultimately became manifest in Jerusalem as well. During the time of Felix (A.D. 52-60), a series of assassinations by the newly emerged Sicarii created an atmosphere of distrust and fear in the city:

 

When the country was purged of these, there sprang up another sort of robbers in Jerusalem, which were called Sicarii, who slew men in the daytime, and in the midst of the city; this they did chiefly at the festivals, when they mingled themselves among the multitude, and concealed daggers under their garments, with which they stabbed those that were their enemies; and when any fell down dead, the murderers became a part of those that had indignation against them; by which means they appeared persons of such reputation, that they could by no means be discovered. The first man who was slain by them was Jonathan the high priest, after whose death many were slain every day, while the fear men were in of being so served was more afflicting than the calamity itself; and while everybody expected death every hour, as men do in war, so men were obliged to look before them, and to take notice of their enemies at a great distance. fn

 

The Sicarii did not inflict their tyranny and terror only on Roman sympathizers, nor were they bent on eliminating only those Jews who cooperated with Rome, such as Jonathan the high priest. Rather, the Sicarii and other bands of robbers also had economic and personal motives. Josephus portrays "the general Jewish populace as moderate, peace-loving Jews who were at the mercy of the revolutionaries, unwilling victims of their tyranny, their greed and their factional conflicts." fn Terrorism was used with impunity by the revolutionaries. Their activity bears a striking resemblance to the work of secret combinations described in the Book of Mormon. A prime example is in Helaman 2:8, which describes the intentions of Kishkumen and his band of insurrectionists, who were eventually led by the notorious Gadianton: "It was his object to murder, and also that it was the object of all those who belonged to his band to murder, and to rob, and to gain power, (and this was their secret plan, and their combination)."

 

Nephi, son of Helaman, describes the plans and principles by which secret combinations have operated in all ages of history (see 3 Ne. 6:28-30). He notes that their members covenant with one another in secret. They combine against the righteous, the innocent, and the unwitting. They seek to deliver the guilty from the grasp of justice. They set at defiance the laws of their own country. And they destroy their governors. Nephi's teachings parallel those of his father, whose observations about his own times round out our picture of the way in which secret combinations hasten the dissolution of civilized societies:

 

They did unite with those bands of robbers, and did enter into their covenants and their oaths, that they would protect and preserve one another in whatsoever difficult circumstances they should be placed, that they should not suffer for their murders, and their plunderings, and their stealings.

 

And it came to pass that they did have their signs, yea, their secret signs, and their secret words; and this that they might distinguish a brother who had entered into the covenant, that whatsoever wickedness his brother should do he should not be injured by his brother, nor by those who did belong to his band, who had taken this covenant.

 

And thus they might murder, and plunder, and steal, and commit whoredoms and all manner of wickedness, contrary to the laws of their country and also the laws of their God. (Hel. 6:21-23)

 

All of the destructive elements in Nephite society can also be observed in the social environment of Jerusalem just before its fall in the first century A.D. In the late fifties, a conflict arose among the priests and the leaders of Jerusalem. The exact cause of the conflict is not clearly specified, but the two groups first hurled insults at each other and then stones. Josephus writes: "And there was nobody to reprove them; but these disorders were after a licentious manner in the city, as if it had no government over it." fn

 

This lawlessness played into the hands of the Sicarii during the rule of the procurator Albinus (A.D. 62-64), who came to Jerusalem during a festival time to restore peace in the land by "destroying many of the sicarii." The Sicarii entered Jerusalem by night just before the festival to kidnap the secretary to the Temple governor. The secretary was used as a hostage to gain the release of ten Sicarii imprisoned by the Romans. The high priest Ananias, who also was the father of the Temple governor, negotiated with Albinus for the release of the Sicarii prisoners. But, Josephus says, "This was the beginning of greater calamities; for the robbers perpetually contrived to catch some of Ananias's servants; and when they had taken them alive, they would not let them go till they thereby recovered some of their own sicarii; and as they were again become no small number, they grew bold, and were a great affliction to the whole country." fn

 

Impetus to revolt against Roman authority, and even authority in general, was now running high both in Jerusalem and in the rest of the country. Many feared war. Yet the people did not suppress the revolutionaries. Much of the unrest was directed against the upper-class Jews, who had preserved for themselves such lucrative positions as tax collector, often by bribing Roman officials. There was oppression in Jerusalem by the aristocracy. Landowners exploited their workers to meet tax obligations to the Romans. Small farmers were threatened with the expropriation of their land if they were unable to pay tribute. Nero's decision in A.D. 60 to deny the Jews of Caesarea equal rights with the Syrian population increased tensions throughout the land. Josephus records that this decision caused Jewish hatred to smolder "till a war was kindled." fn Another scholar writes, "The hostility and fear created throughout the nation by this situation contributed greatly to the atmosphere in Jerusalem where a clash between Jews and Roman troops opened the war." fn

 

The First Jewish War

 

The actions of the procurator Gessius Florus (A.D. 64-66), who returned to the policy of ruling with a strong hand, provided the final impulse to bloody revolution. A violent clash between Jews and Greeks at Caesarea resulted in the imprisonment by Florus of a delegation sent to him to seek justice for the Jews of that port city. When word of the tumult reached Jerusalem, the citizens there regarded the matter as serious but "restrain[ed] their passion" until Florus "blew up the war into a flame." fn

 

In the summer of A.D. 66, the procurator confiscated seventeen talents from the Temple treasury, claiming the people were in arrears in tribute to Caesar. This pretext so shocked the people that they broke into a riot, whereupon Florus marched against Jerusalem with an armed force and allowed a cohort to plunder that part of the city called the Upper Market Place. The inhabitants of Jerusalem had been prepared to submit to Florus, but his troops behaved so badly ("no method of plunder was omitted") and the activity of revolutionaries so intensified that moderation was swept aside. The people cut off Roman communications and erected fortifications between the Antonia Fortress and the Temple. Fearing for his safety, Florus departed from Jerusalem, leaving a cohort to reinforce his garrison. Thousands of Jewish citizens of Jerusalem had been slain, including "many of the quiet people" (innocent victims). fn

 

King Agrippa II tried to persuade the citizens of Jerusalem to submit to Rome. Josephus relates that when Agrippa's speech was concluded, the people cried out that they were taking up arms not against the Romans but against Florus, because of all he had done to them. The people agreed to rectify their own acts of war by collecting the tribute they had refused to pay and by repairing the porticoes between the Temple and the Antonia Fortress that had been torn down in their battle with Florus. But when Agrippa tried to persuade the citizens of Jerusalem to submit to Florus until a new procurator arrived, the Jews heaped abuse upon the king and banished him from the city. fn Thus, the main motive for the opening battle of the First Jewish War seems to have been Jerusalem's outrage over the abuses of Florus and his attempted control of the Temple and the state.

 

With Jerusalem's population in rebellion and control of the city in the hands of the chief priests, the Temple officiators became caught up in the revolt. Led by the Temple governor, Eleazar, son of Ananias the high priest, and supported by the revolutionary leaders of the people, these lower priests stopped the twice-daily sacrifices offered on behalf of the Roman Empire and the emperor—an action tantamount to a declaration of war. They also refused to accept any offerings or sacrifices from Gentiles. fn These actions broke the treaty with Rome and put Israel officially outside the empire. fn

 

Control of the city thus slipped from the hands of the chief priests and leading Pharisees when they were unable to dissuade the lower priests from this "strange innovation" that would provoke war with Rome. Civil war broke out. Eleazar and his followers occupied the Temple and the Lower City; the chief priests, who sent to Florus and Agrippa for military support, occupied the Upper City. The factions battled for control of Jerusalem and the state, as Josephus tells us:

 

So they made use of stones and slings perpetually against one another, and threw darts continually on both sides! and sometimes it happened that they made excursions by troops, and fought it out hand to hand, while the seditious were superior in boldness, but the king's soldiers in skill. These last strove chiefly to gain the temple, and to drive those out of it who profaned it; as did the seditious, with Eleazar (besides what they had already) labour[ing] to gain the upper city. Thus were their perpetual slaughters on both sides for seven days' time; but neither side would yield up the parts they had seized upon. fn

 

During this time Eleazar held a Temple festival and excluded his opponents. The Sicarii joined the followers of Eleazar in their cause. The Sicarii besieged the chief priests in the Upper City and burned the house of the high priest, Ananias, and other buildings, including archives, so that the insurrectionists, particularly the Sicarri, could "dissolve their obligations for paying debts." Then Menahem, son of Judas the Galilean, arrived in Jerusalem with his own armed brigands after he had secured Masada with its stores of arms. fn He took over leadership of the revolt from Eleazar and successfully besieged Herod's Palace in the Upper City. The three royal towers—Hippicus, Phasael, and Mariamne—fell to Menahem's band. One by one the strongholds of Jerusalem were captured, and by August the entire city was in the hands of the rebel Jews. The high priest, Ananias, was captured in an aqueduct and executed. fn

 

Menahem's control of the rebellion was ended when Eleazar's partisans rejected Menahem's messianic claims to absolute authority. They tortured and killed him and forced his followers, including the Sicarii, to flee to Masada. Among those who fled was another Eleazar, son of Jarius and kinsman of Menahem, who became the leader of the group at Masada. The Sicarii and Menahem had enabled the insurgents to succeed against traditional Jewish authority and Roman loyalists. But Eleazar, the Temple governor, resumed leadership of the revolt. The Roman garrison in the city, which had taken refuge in the Antonia towers, requested a safe exit from Jerusalem in return for their surrender. Once the Romans laid down their arms, Eleazar's party attacked and killed them. Only the Roman commander, Metilius, was spared because he promised to become a Jew and be circumcised. fn Josephus tells us ironically that this event took place on the Sabbath, "on which day the Jews have a respite from their works on account of divine worship." fn

 

It is not clear who was in charge of Jerusalem between the massacre of the Romans in August of A.D. 66 and the arrival of Cestius Gallus, governor of Syria, in October. It is clear, however, that the rebellion begun in Jerusalem spread to Caesarea, Scythopolis, and finally to Tyre. Hearing of the outbreak of war at Jerusalem, Gallus entered Judaea with the Twelfth Legion Fulminata ("the Thundering One"), advancing by way of the coast through Beth-Horon until he arrived at the capital city. Gallus penetrated Jerusalem but faltered before the walls of the Temple. Eleazar's party led the fight against him. During the battles, the leaders of the revolt killed Gallus' envoys because they feared that a promise of amnesty in return for surrender would be accepted by the people. The revolutionaries also thwarted a plot by some leading citizens of Jerusalem to open the gates to the Syrian governor to prevent further tragedy. Gallus unexpectedly abandoned his siege of Jerusalem as winter was setting in and retreated by way of the Beth-Horon pass. There his troops suffered disastrous losses at the hands of a band of rebels led by Simon bar Giora. fn Great damage was done and valuable weapons and stores were seized, which the Jewish victors brought back to Jerusalem while singing songs of triumph. fn

 

So unexpected and sensational was this victory that most Jews leaned toward the rebels, who put Jerusalem under a provisional war government with a former high priest at its head. The high priesthood thus resumed its traditional political leadership of the Jewish people. Jerusalem minted its own silver coins, collected taxes when it could, and divided the country into seven military districts, each with its own commander. The most famous appointment was made for the most important district—Galilee—which bore the brunt of the early Roman offensive. Its commander was a young priest, Joseph, son of Mattathias, who lacked any military experience. Later, he wrote histories under the romanized name of Josephus. fn

 

Shaken by the success of the Jewish revolt, Nero sent Rome's best military commander, Vespasian, with three hand-picked legions to crush the insurrection at all costs. Massive and bloody actions followed in A.D. 67 and 68. In the north, Josephus spent most of his time suppressing factions of revolutionaries. Finally, his army dispersed almost without fighting, and he took refuge in the fortress of Jotapata, where he was besieged. Forty-seven days later he defected to the Romans. fn The more radical elements of the revolt in Galilee were led by John, son of Levi, and had their headquarters at a town called Gischala. They opposed Josephus and his moderate methods but could do little to prevent their entire region from falling into the hands of Vespasian's son, the Roman general Titus. John, however, did manage to save himself and some of his followers by escaping to Jerusalem. fn

 

In the south, the revolutionaries at Masada—the Sicarii, as Josephus labeled them—did nothing to stop the Roman advance. But they did conduct raids against other Jews, which was apparently their main activity. One tragic foray was directed against the village of En-gedi on Passover eve, which illustrates the bitterness of the factionalism. The Sicarii held out at Masada for the entire war and did not come to the aid of any of their fellow Jews during the final siege of Jerusalem. fn It is apparent that to Josephus the Sicarii on Masada and the Zealots at the Temple were two separate factions of the revolutionary movement, and neither was held in high regard. fn

 

In the winter of A.D. 67-68, a group of revolutionaries led by yet another Eleazar (son of Simon) seized the Temple and formed a new government by choosing a new high priest by lot. Josephus specifically cites Eleazar, son of Simon, as the one who caused the Zealots to break with the people and withdraw into the sacred precincts. fn He was the most influential man of the party because of his ability to conceive and carry out important measures. fn

 

The Zealot party in Jerusalem included priests and lay revolutionaries who had been responsible a year earlier for instigating the war. fn Eleazar, son of Simon, had been the chief revolutionary leader during the siege of Cestius Gallus, and after the Jewish victory he controlled the money and the spoils gained from it. fn The lofty ideals upon which the Zealot sect had been founded were now subjugated to less noble values. Eventually Eleazar and his group began to suspect that the provisional government was moderating its prosecution of the war. When the head of the provisional government threatened to influence the people to suppress terrorism in the city of Jerusalem, Eleazar persuaded the various revolutionary factions to come together and take their stand in the Temple, choose a new high priest, and make use of the weapons seized earlier from the retreat of Cestius Gallus. fn

 

The reemergence of the Zealots was not without grave difficulties for the city of Jerusalem. After the people had established their own high priestly government, they besieged the Temple, where the Zealots were located. fn The Zealots, expecting the provisional government to betray the city into the hands of the Romans, sent for radical Jews from Idumaea to come to their aid. This strategy was suggested by John of Gischala, who had pretended to support the provisional government but now sided with the Zealots in the Temple, at least temporarily. fn An army of Idumaeans promptly appeared at the gate of the city but was prevented from entering by the chief priests. Some Zealots managed to escape their Temple holdout and let them in during a night rainstorm. The Zealots, freed from their confinement in the Temple, controlled all of Jerusalem by the next morning. fn

 

Thousands of Jerusalemites were killed and the city looted by the fury of the Zealots and Idumaeans. The leader of the provisional government and his immediate subordinate were executed while many of the citizens of the city were being slaughtered. The youth of the nobility were also killed, tortured, or imprisoned. Eminent citizens were brought before a newly summoned Sanhedrin on charges of treason and sometimes executed without due process. fn It is little wonder that Josephus accused the Zealots of bringing about the dissolution of laws and society in Jerusalem and Judaea. fn

 

The Siege of Jerusalem, A.D. 70

 

By the spring of A.D. 69, Vespasian had completely isolated Jerusalem. By the summer the Jews held only four fortified locations—Jerusalem, Herodium, Masada, and Machaerus on the opposite shore of the Dead Sea. In July Roman troops at Alexandria and Caesarea proclaimed Vespasian emperor of Rome after three men had succeeded one another to the imperial office within one year's time. In the spring of 70, Vespasian ascended the throne in Rome and ordered his eldest son, Titus, to continue the campaign in Judaea. Titus led the massive force of the Fifth, Tenth, Twelfth, and Fifteenth legions. fn

 

With the approach of the Romans, the wrenching conflicts between the Zealots and the people of Jerusalem finally ceased as the insurrectionists realized they were facing total destruction at the hands of their common enemy, Rome. Command of the forces in Jerusalem was divided between Simon bar Giora and John of Gischala. Their combined armies did not exceed twenty-five thousand, in contrast to the eighty thousand Roman troops. fn

 

The Romans set up a main camp northwest of the city (the area known today as the Russian Compound) and a secondary one on the Mount of Olives. Titus planned to attack from the north, the city's vulnerable side, which lacked protection by hills and valleys. Titus established his headquarters on Mount Scopus, the northern end of the Mount of Olives range. The soldiers breached the northern sections of the third and second walls by the end of May, and the main camp of the Romans was then moved inside the city. Titus ordered a siege wall constructed around the city to starve out its defenders—a tactic that was particularly effective because many supplies had been destroyed in the previous months of fighting. In July the Antonia Fortress, at the northwest corner of the Temple platform and under the command of John of Gischala, was taken and razed. But the defenders built a new wall and continued to hold the Temple courtyard and the Temple proper. fn

 

By August 6, the daily Temple sacrifices were halted because of a shortage of both priests and animals. From outside the walls, Josephus shouted appeals to the Jewish defenders to surrender and thus save the Temple. But the Zealots fought on, standing on the roofed porticoes around the Temple courtyard to hurl missiles of all kinds—stones, arrows, and firebrands—down upon the Roman soldiers. On August 15, Titus ordered the wooden roofs and porches around the Temple to be burned. The Romans then moved into the outer courtyard, the Court of the Gentiles, as the defenders fought on from the inner courts, the Court of the Women, the Court of the Men of Israel, and then the Sanctuary itself. Flaming brands were tossed into the Temple itself through an open window, and the House of God was burned on the ninth of Ab (August 28). fn

 

As the Temple burned, frenzy gripped both attackers and defenders. Roman shock troops burst through, and Titus was able to dash into the Temple just long enough for a brief look; then heat forced him out. His soldiers continued burning whatever could be kindled, and killing all they could reach, whether combatants, women, or children. Many Jews flung themselves into the fire and perished with their Temple. Others, hiding in corners, were burned to death as Roman torches set new fires. fn

 

On August 30, Roman forces captured the Lower City. But the Upper City, on the Western Hill overlooking the Temple Mount, held out stubbornly. It took the Romans one month to overpower the last stronghold of Jewish resistance. With full fury, the soldiers set the houses on fire and slaughtered the inhabitants.

 

Pouring into the alleys, sword in hand, [the soldiers] massacred indiscriminately all whom they met, and burnt the houses with all who had taken refuge within. Often in the course of their raids, on entering the houses for loot, they would find whole families dead and the rooms filled with victims of the famine. . . . Running everyone through who fell in their way, they choked the alleys with corpses and deluged the whole city with blood, insomuch that many of the fires were extinguished by the gory stream. Towards the evening they ceased slaughtering, but when night fell the fire gained the mastery. fn

 

The Upper City had been a residential district inhabited by royalty, aristocracy, and well-to-do Jews living in beautiful homes. In the Upper City archaeologists and historians have found people's dwellings complete with ritual baths, mosaic tile floors, and frescoes. It is today called the Herodian Quarter, to identify the strata dating from between 37 B.C. and A.D. 70. Excavations there have uncovered some of the most dramatic evidence ever found of the Roman destruction. The Burnt House and the Herodian Mansion are, perhaps, the most striking reminders of the horror and anguish experienced by the inhabitants during the months of August and September, A.D. 70. Almost everything discovered in the Herodian Quarter clearly reflects destruction by fire and recalls the images presented by Josephus. Among the items found in the Burnt House, so-called because of the discernible burn layer dating to 70, were the skeletal remains of a human arm in the burnt kitchen, hand spread out grasping at a step, and a spear in a corner of another room—ample witness to brutality played out there. fn

 

By the decree of Titus, the people of Jerusalem were taken captive and its buildings leveled:

 

Now the number of those that were carried captive during this whole war was collected to be ninety-seven thousand; as was the number of those that perished during the whole siege, eleven hundred thousand, the greater part of whom were indeed of the same nation [with the citizens of Jerusalem,] but not belonging to the city itself. fn

 

Caesar [Titus] gave orders that they should now demolish the entire city and temple, but should leave as many of the towers standing as were of the greatest eminency; that is, Phasaelus, and Hippicus, and Mariamne, and so much of the wall as enclosed the city on the west side. . . . but for all the rest of the wall it was so thoroughly laid even with the ground by those that dug it up to the foundation, that there was left nothing to make those that came thither believe it had ever been inhabited. fn

 

Titus left the city and traveled in a roundabout route back to Rome, pausing for victory festivals in which Jewish captives had to fight each other in gladiatorial games or face wild animals. Arriving home in A.D. 71, he, his father, Vespasian, and his brother Domitian, all rode in a great triumphal procession. Carried ahead of Titus were the now-famous trophies from the Temple: the menorah or seven-branched candelabrum, a great ritual table, and a Torah scroll. The leaders of the revolt were paraded with nooses around their necks. Simon bar Giora was executed next to the Forum, and John of Gischala was imprisoned for life. Jewish captives were sold in the slave markets of the empire. Roman coins were struck to memorialize the outcome of the great Jewish revolt against Rome. They depicted a woman with bound hands and bowed head sitting at the foot of a palm tree. Below her read the words in Latin, "Judea vanquished; Judea captive"! fn

 

Back in Judaea the Jews tried to comprehend the magnitude of the disaster that had changed their capital city, their religion, and their lives forever. The only parts of the Temple precinct that remained relatively intact were the four massive retaining walls that supported the Temple platform. Among the gigantic ashlars, or sections, of the western wall—called in Hebrew the Kotel Ma'aravi—one has become famous. For nineteen centuries Jewish pilgrims have mourned there the loss of the Temple; their laments uttered at a certain section of the western retaining wall led to its being called by a name Jews neither used nor approved of: "The Wailing Wall."

 

The destruction of the Temple on the ninth of Ab became an annual occasion for great mourning in Judaism. "Grief greater than words could express afflicted the faithful as they recalled what had been the fate of their Temple and its defenders. Some rabbis were said to have suffered permanent facial wounds, so furrowed were their cheeks by tears shed for the Temple. . . . A sorrow that seemed to grow with passing generations became part of the memorial of the vanished Temple." fn

 

Conclusion

 

Can anyone doubt that wickedness destroyed Jerusalem—more specifically, the wickedness born of conspiracy, brigandage, assassinations, and clandestine abductions? Such was the wickedness that destroyed other civilizations, just as a Book of Mormon prophet had warned: "Whatsoever nation shall uphold such secret combinations, to get power and gain, until they shall spread over the nation, behold, they shall be destroyed" (Ether 8:22). This was the kind of wickedness that Josephus described firsthand. He writes of the revolutionaries:

 

All sorts of misfortunes also sprang from these men, and the nation was infected with this doctrine to an incredible degree; one violent war came upon us after another, and we lost our friends, who used to alleviate our pain; there were also very great robberies and murders of our principal men. This was done in pretence indeed for the public welfare, but in reality for the hopes of gain to themselves; whence arose seditions, and from them murders of men, which sometimes fell on those of their own people, (by the madness of these men towards one another, while their desire was that none of the adverse party might be left,) and sometimes on their enemies . . . nay the sedition at last increased so high, that the very temple of God was burnt down by their enemy's fire. fn

 

The first century after Christ was not the only time in Jerusalem's history when the evils associated with secret combinations contributed to the fall of the Holy City. Jeremiah and Ezekiel cite conspiracy, robbery, and oppression as causes for the destruction of 586 B.C. (see Jer. 11:9; Ezek. 22:25, 29-31). But behind the wickedness of the Zealots, Sicarii, and secret combinations of the First Jewish Revolt was an even greater evil to be reckoned with. Reflecting on the disaster of A.D. 70 takes us immediately back to the prophecies Jesus made forty years earlier of the destruction of Jerusalem and its Temple and of the death and scattering of its people. In a chilling prophecy of near-future events, Jesus said to those mourners who followed him to Golgotha only hours before his own death:

 

Daughters of Jerusalem, weep not for me, but weep for yourselves, and for your children.

 

For, behold, the days are coming, in the which they shall say, Blessed are the barren, and the wombs that never bare, and the paps which never gave suck.

 

Then shall they begin to say to the mountains, Fall on us; and to the hills, Cover us. (Luke 23:28-30)

 

Truly this prediction was fulfilled in the devastation of Jerusalem in the year A.D. 70, described by the Savior in his Olivet discourse as the "abomination of desolation" (JS-M 1:12). On that occasion, also during the last week of his mortal ministry, he had warned his disciples that in the coming days there would be "great tribulation on the Jews, and upon the inhabitants of Jerusalem, such as was not before sent upon Israel" (JS-M 1:18).

 

Why did all the prophecies, scriptural predictions, forestalled chastisements, and careful warnings of past ages converge in force during the years from A.D. 66 to 70 in Jerusalem? Why was all the robbery, murder, and work of secret combinations unleashed with such fury so quickly?

 

The reason Jerusalem and her inhabitants were destroyed is that they had rejected their true king. The ultimate act of Israel's disloyalty was manifest in the dismissal of Jesus' claims to be the long-foretold Messiah, the Lord of Life, the great Jehovah of the Old Testament, who came to earth in fulfillment of millennia-old prophecies, only to be crucified ignominiously between two thieves.

 

The events of A.D. 70 should not have been surprising to the inhabitants of the Holy City. Toward the end of his ministry Jesus had said, "Except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish" (Luke 13:5). And then he gave the parable of the fig tree as a graphic illustration: "And if it bear fruit, well: and if not, then after that thou shalt cut it down" (Luke 13:9). Not only did contemporary Jewish teachings describe Israel as a fig tree but rabbinical teachings affirmed that "all the prophets prophesied only concerning the days of the Messiah." fn And yet, after the Crucifixion, after so many witnesses, Jerusalem's leaders sank deeper into the mire of hatred for Jesus, though they knew the truth, as the book of Acts confirms (see Acts 4:1-30; 5:17-33). The words of Elder Bruce R. McConkie are poignant:

 

And now the ax was laid at the root of the rotted tree. Jerusalem was to pay the price. Daniel had foretold this hour when desolation, born of abomination and wickedness, would sweep the city. . . . Moses had said the siege would be so severe women would eat their own children. (Deut. 28.) Jesus specified the destruction would come in the days of the disciples.

 

And come it did, in vengeance, without restraint. Hunger exceeded human endurance; blood flowed in the streets; destruction made desolate the temple; 1,100,000 Jews were slaughtered; Jerusalem was ploughed as a field; and a remnant of a once mighty nation scattered to the ends of the earth. The Jewish nation died, impaled on Roman spears, at the hands of Gentile overlords.

 

But what of the saints who dwelt in Jerusalem in that gloomy day? They heeded Jesus' warning and fled in haste. Guided by revelation, as true saints always are, they fled to Pella in Perea and were spared. fn

 

Josephus was a remarkable eyewitness to the great calamity of the first century after Christ. He felt that he had been raised up by God to recount the episodes of Jerusalem's tragedy, that he would betray "the commands of God if he died before they were delivered." fn He seems to have identified with Israel's ancient prophets who predicted Jerusalem's downfall on account of disobedience. He also believed that the tragedy itself evolved out of the establishment of the Zealot sect, that the high ideals of the founding members of the movement in A.D. 6 had become hollow rhetoric by 70. In fact, the bands of robbers, assassins, and other brigands that finally brought about the desolation of the Holy City were a natural consequence of the root cause of the desolation of A.D. 70—rejection of the Messiah. But this returns us to Josephus' point: It was God who sentenced the Temple to the flames; its destruction could not have been stopped though Titus himself endeavored to quench the flames. fn

 

Notes

 

1. Epstein, Judaism, 105.

 

2. Josephus, Wars 2.4.1; Antiquities 17.10.5.

 

3. Gamala was technically in the district of Gaulanitis, but it was popularly identified with Galilee. See Rhoads, Israel in Revolution, 48.

 

4. Josephus, Wars 2.8.1.

 

5. Josephus, Antiquities 18.1.1.

 

6. Josephus, Antiquities 18.1.1, 6.

 

7. Russell, Between the Testaments, 38.

 

8. This translation of Josephus, Antiquities 18.1.1 is found in Rhoads, Israel in Revolution, 49.

 

9. A good example is the clash caused by Pilate's arrival as praefect in A.D. 26. It will be remembered that he brought into Jerusalem, under cover of night, Roman troops carrying army standards bearing Roman images. This action violated Jewish law against graven images. The ensuing popular march to Caesarea and protest before Pilate won the removal of the offensive standards from Jerusalem without armed revolt. See Kraeling, "Episode of the Roman Standard," 263-89.

 

10. Annas was high priest in the days of Jesus' youth and a man of tremendous influence, even though he had been deposed by the Romans in A.D. 15. His son-in-law was Caiaphas, the high priest before whom Jesus was arraigned at the time of the Crucifixion. But so powerful was Annas that Jesus was taken first to him (see John 18:13). Annas' five sons also served in turn as high priest.

 

11. Josephus, Antiquities 18.2.1.

 

12. Rhoads, Israel in Revolution, 28-29.

 

13. Josephus, Wars 2.6.2.

 

14. Josephus, Wars 2.6.1; Antiquities 17.11.1. See also Rhoads, Israel in Revolution, 51.

 

15. Josephus, Antiquities 20.5.2.

 

16. Josephus, Wars 2.17.8.

 

17. Josephus, Wars 7.8.1.

 

18. Josephus, Wars 2.12.2; Antiquities 20.5.3.

 

19. Josephus, Wars 2.12.2; Antiquities 20.5.4.

 

20. Rhoads, Israel in Revolution, 71.

 

21. Josephus, Wars 2.12.5.

 

22. Josephus, Wars 2.12.5.

 

23. Josephus, Antiquities 20.6.1. The bracketed words are an alternate translation of the passage.

 

24. See Tacitus, Histories, 5.9.

 

25. Josephus uses the term sicarii in narratives of the period before A.D. 66 more to describe a method of resistance than a formal sect. After A.D. 66 he uses the word Sicarii to refer to the specific group that ends up on Masada. Rhoads, Israel in Revolution, 56: "The group led by Judas' descendants who are designated during the war period as 'Sicarii' were probably among the revolutionaries of the fifties and sixties, but Josephus' functional use of sicarii and 'brigands' in his narrative of the prewar period does not reveal the connection explicitly."

 

26. Rhoads, Israel in Revolution, 73.

 

27. Rhoads, Israel in Revolution, 73-74.

 

28. Josephus, Wars 2.13.3.

 

29. Rhoads, Israel in Revolution, 12. See also the many passages that support this assessment in Josephus, including Wars Preface, 4; 4.7.1; 4.9.10; 5.1.5; 5.6.1; 5.6.2; 5.10.4.

 

30. Josephus, Antiquities 20. . .

 

31. Josephus, Antiquities 20.9.3.

 

32. Josephus, Antiquities 20.8.9.

 

33. Rhoads, Israel in Revolution, 93.

 

34. Josephus, Wars 2.14.5-6.

 

35. Josephus, Wars 2.14.4-9.

 

36. Josephus, Wars 2.17.1.

 

37. Josephus, Wars 2.17.2.

 

38. Rhoads, Israel in Revolution, 99.

 

39. Josephus, Wars 2.17.5.

 

40. Masada was a mountain fortress hideaway near the western shore of the Dead Sea. It had belonged to Herod the Great and was then used by the Romans as an outpost until Menahem and his followers stormed it in A.D. 66.

 

41. Josephus, Wars 2.17.6-9.

 

42. Josephus, Wars 2.17.9-10.

 

43. Josephus, Wars 2.17.10.

 

44. Josephus, Wars 2.19.2.

 

45. Josephus, Wars 2.19.3-9. See also the excellent summary in Aharoni and Avi-Yonah, Macmillan Bible Atlas, Map 251.

 

46. Josephus, Wars 2.20.4. Also Aharoni and Avi-Yonah, Macmillan Bible Atlas, Map 251. Eleazar, son of the high priest Ananias, was assigned to Idumea in the south.

 

47. Aharoni and Avi-Yonah, Macmillan Bible Atlas, Map 252, is an excellent summary.

 

48. The antagonism between Josephus and John was extreme. Josephus had a reputation as a moderate; John of Gischala was a radical and an instigator. Josephus sent letters to those towns where John had followers, threatening to destroy their houses and property if they did not transfer their allegiance to him. Three thousand deserted John, leaving him only fifteen hundred men. John remained in Gischala for fear of Josephus. See Josephus Wars 2.21.8. Gischala was the last city to be taken in the Galilean campaign. John's escape and night flight are described by Josephus in Wars 4.2.4-5.

 

49. Their numbers were composed largely of followers of Menahem, son of Judas the Galilean. See the very negative assessment of Rhoads, Israel in Revolution, 117-18.

 

50. Rhoads, Israel in Revolution, 105-6.

 

51. Josephus, Wars 5.1.2.

 

52. Josephus, Wars 4.4.1.

 

53. Rhoads, Israel in Revolution, 103.

 

54. Josephus, Wars 2.20.3.

 

55. Rhoads, Israel in Revolution, 105.

 

56. Josephus, Wars 4.3.11-13.

 

57. Josephus, Wars 4.3.13-4.4.2.

 

58. Josephus, Wars 4.4.6-4.5.1.

 

59. Josephus, Wars 4.5.3-4.

 

60. Josephus, Wars 4.3.14.

 

61. Aharoni and Avi-Yonah, Macmillan Bible Atlas, Maps 255, 256.

 

62. Aharoni and Avi-Yonah, Macmillan Bible Atlas, Maps 255, 256.

 

63. Many sources contain excellent summaries of the siege. See especially Aharoni and Avi-Yonah, Macmillan Bible Atlas, Map 256; Klein and Klein, Temple beyond Time, 111-15; Kenyon, Digging Up Jerusalem, 249-55. For specific points see Josephus, Wars 5; 6.

 

64. Aharoni and Avi-Yonah, Macmillan Bible Atlas, Map 256.

 

65. Klein and Klein, Temple beyond Time, 112. For Josephus' description of events, see Wars 6.4.6-7.

 

66. This quotation is excerpted from a translation of Josephus, Wars 6.8-10 in Avigad, Discovering Jerusalem, 137.

 

67. Avigad, Discovering Jerusalem, 137; see also 120-39 for a discussion of the Burnt House.

 

68. Josephus, Wars 6.9.3.

 

69. Josephus, Wars 8.1.1.

 

70. Klein and Klein, Temple beyond Time, 115.

 

71. Klein and Klein, Temple beyond Time, 115.

 

72. Josephus, Antiquities 18.1.1.

 

73. Tractate Sanhedrin, cited in Thy People Shall Be My People, 75.

 

74. McConkie, Doctrinal New Testament Commentary, 1:644-45. "Mothers snatched food from their children's mouths and one mother roasted her own son to survive. The time foreseen by Jesus when she who had no child or babe at the breast would bless herself, or when one might call upon mountains to fall and bring merciful release, was at hand. Women of Jerusalem were bitterly weeping for themselves [see Josephus, Wars 6.3.4]." Peterson and Tate, Pearl of Great Price, 190.

 

75. Josephus, Wars 3.8.5.

 

76. Josephus, Wars 6.4.5.

 

 

(David B. Galbraith, D. Kelly Ogden, and Andrew C. Skinner, Jerusalem: The Eternal City [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1996], 201.)

 

 

(Joseph Smith-Matthew: 18.)

 

18 For then, in those days, shall be great tribulation on the Jews, and upon the inhabitants of Jerusalem, such as was not before sent upon Israel, of God, since the beginning of their kingdom until this time; no, nor ever shall be sent again upon Israel.

 

The JST on the Second Coming of Christ

 

Keith W. Perkins

 

As with all of the work of the Prophet Joseph Smith, the Joseph Smith Translation of the Bible adds some very important information to our gospel understanding. There are additional verses which illuminate many aspects of the life and ministry of the Savior that cannot be found in any other book. A classic example of this concerns the period of time following the visit of the boy Jesus at age twelve to the temple in Jerusalem. The present biblical record is almost silent on this stage of Christ's ministry. Luke alone makes any mention of this period: He "came to Nazareth, and was subject unto them. . . . And Jesus increased in wisdom and stature, and in favour with God and man." (Luke 2:51-52.)

 

For this juncture of Jesus' life, however, three critical verses have been added to the Gospel of Matthew by the Prophet Joseph Smith. Had they been found in the Holy Land, like the Dead Sea Scrolls, these verses would have been proclaimed as one of the greatest biblical discoveries of our age. Not only have these verses been ignored by biblical scholars, which we would expect, but they have generally been ignored by Latter-day Saints, which should not be the case. These verses give us a great deal of insight into the years of preparation by the Son of God.

 

And it came to pass that Jesus grew up with his brethren, and waxed strong, and waited upon the Lord for the time of his ministry to come.

 

And he served under his father, and he spake not as other men, neither could he be taught; for he needed not that any man should teach him.

 

And after many years, the hour of his ministry drew nigh. (JST Matthew 3:24-26.)

 

As it is with these verses, so it is with our understanding of the second coming of Christ. Truths are taught in the JST that are found nowhere else in scripture, truths which have not only been ignored by biblical scholars but also frequently overlooked by Latter-day Saints. Let us first look at the changes Joseph Smith made in Matthew chapter 24, Mark chapter 13, and Luke chapter 21, which provide great insights into the Second Coming.

 

One of the most significant changes made by the Prophet in Matthew 24 is the rearrangement of the verses. The following chart shows these changes.

 

 Significant Changes in Verses

 

Matthew 24 Joseph Smith-Matthew

 

v. 6 v. 23, 28

 

v. 7 v. 29

 

v. 8 v. 19

 

v. 14 v. 31

 

v. 15 v. 12, 32

 

v. 33 v. 39

 

v. 34 v. 34

 

v. 35 v. 35

 

v. 36 v. 40

 

This rearrangement becomes very significant when it is realized that the Prophet Joseph Smith rearranged the verses so that those signs that apply to the destruction of the temple, Jerusalem, and the Jews following the death of Jesus are placed in the first portion of Matthew 24, while those verses concerning the second coming of Christ are placed together at the end of the chapter.

 

Another significant change is the many additions made by the Prophet in Mark 13 so that it now reads basically the same as Matthew 24, with a few additions and deletions.

 

Let us first examine what the Savior said about the destruction of the temple, Jerusalem and the Jews, and see how this can help us as we prepare for his second coming. From the JST we learn very plainly concerning the two questions the apostles were asking Jesus: "Tell us when shall these things be which thou hast said concerning the destruction of the temple, and the Jews; and what is the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world, or the destruction of the wicked, which is the end of the world?" (JS-M 1:4). Notice that in this version by the Prophet we get the definition of what the Savior meant by the end of the world—the destruction of the wicked.

 

Jesus further warned them in this chapter of a number of things that would happen prior to both events. Before the destruction of the temple there would be false Christs who would deceive many (v. 6). The apostles would be hated by all nations and eventually they would be killed (v. 7). False prophets would arise who would deceive many (v. 9). Iniquity would abound and the love of many would wax cold (v. 10).

 

In addition to these signs given both in Joseph Smith-Matthew and JST Mark, Luke 21 also gives us interesting insights into those events that would precede the destruction of the temple of Jerusalem. In discussing how they will be hated by all nations, Jesus gives some additional detail as to how they would be treated. They would be tried in the synagogues before kings and rulers, and finally cast into prisons (Luke 21:12), but there would be something which must have seemed even worse: they would be betrayed by parents, brethren, kinsfolk, and friends—and in some cases these close associates and relatives would cause them to be killed (Luke 21:16). The Lord promised them, however, that their suffering was only a temporary thing—for this life—and in the Resurrection "not an hair of your head [will] perish. In your patience possess ye your souls" (Luke 21:18-19; cf. Alma 40:23).

 

Next Jesus warned them of the great destruction coming upon Jerusalem and how the former-day Saints would be able to escape this disaster. Both JS-M and JST Mark talk about the abomination of desolation which Daniel had predicted. Contrary to the many things that some have felt this meant, the JST plainly teaches us that it had reference to the destruction of Jerusalem (JS-M 1:12; Mark 13:14). But in Luke 21:20, we are given even further detail on how this time can be determined: "And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh." In an earlier account of the Savior's prophecy concerning what was coming upon Jerusalem, Luke records, "Thine enemies shall cast a trench about thee, and compass thee round, and keep thee in on every side, And shall lay thee even with the ground, and thy children within thee; and they shall not leave in thee one stone upon another; because thou knewest not the time of thy visitation" (Luke 19:43-44).

 

Thus the warning of the coming abomination of desolation was very clear: Jerusalem would be encircled by an invading army which would bring about its complete destruction. This prediction was very dramatically fulfilled when in A.D. 70 the city was leveled to the ground by the Romans, and, according to Josephus, the Jewish historian, approximately one million Jews were killed. fn

 

Not only did the Lord tell his faithful Saints what was coming upon Jerusalem, but he detailed how they could avoid the impending destruction. He instructed the early Saints that when they saw the signs that he had forwarned them of they were to immediately leave Jerusalem. Those in Judea were to flee into the mountains (see JS-M 1:13). The disaster was coming so rapidly that leaving immediately was essential for their temporal salvation. Those on the housetop were not even to take time to return into the house to take their belongings with them (see JS-M 1:14). Those in the field were not to return back to their own homes to take their clothing (see JS-M 1:15). They were to remember Lot's wife and not look back at what they had to leave (see Luke 17:32).

 

The Savior expressed concern over those who might be expecting a child at the time and also that their flight not be in the winter or on the Sabbath because of the speed with which they had to flee (see JS-M 1:16-17). He further instructed them that despite the terrible things that had befallen the Jews before (capture by the Babylonians, Assyrians, etc.) the coming destruction would be the worst tribulation that had ever befallen the nation of Israel or ever would befall them at Jerusalem (see JS-M 1:18). All one has to do to see the fulfillment of this prophecy is read of the destruction that came upon Jerusalem as described by Josephus. fn

 

Obedient to this command of the Savior, the Jewish converts to Christianity immediately left Jerusalem when the predicted signs came to pass. The Christian historian Eusebius gives us a vivid description of what took place:

 

The rest of the apostles who were harassed in innumerable ways, with a view to destroy them, and driven from the land of Judea, had gone to preach the gospel to all nations. The whole body, however, of the church at Jerusalem, having been commanded by a divine revelation, given to men of approved piety there before the war, removed from the city and dwelt at a certain town beyond the Jordan, called Pella. Here, those that believed in Christ, having removed from Jerusalem, as if holy men had entirely abandoned the royal city itself, and the whole land of Judea; the divine justice, for their crimes against Christ and his apostles, finally overtook them, totally destroying the whole generation of these evil doers from the earth. fn

 

Thus, by being obedient to the command of the Lord, these early Saints escaped the terrible destruction that came upon Jerusalem. This is very important because the rest of Joseph Smith-Matthew, and the other similar scriptures, tell us what events are going to precede the second coming of the Savior; they also tell us how we can avoid many of the problems that are coming. By learning from the past, we too may escape to a degree those terrible predictions that are connected with Christ's second coming.

 

 

(Monte S. Nyman and Charles D. Tate, Jr., eds., Joseph Smith Translation: The Restoration of Plain and Precious Things [Provo: BYU Religious Studies Center, 1985], 237.)

 

 

Answer to the 2nd Question

 

(Joseph Smith-Matthew: 21-27.) – False Christ’s will come.  Wars and rumors of wars but not the war to precede the 2nd coming, all will know when Christ returns, it won’t be a secret.

 

21 Behold, these things I have spoken unto you concerning the Jews; and again, after the tribulation of those days which shall come upon Jerusalem, if any man shall say unto you, Lo, here is Christ, or there, believe him not;

 

22 For in those days there shall also arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders, insomuch, that, if possible, they shall deceive the very elect, who are the elect according to the covenant.

 

23 Behold, I speak these things unto you for the elect's sake; and you also shall hear of wars, and rumors of wars; see that ye be not troubled, for all I have told you must come to pass; but the end is not yet.

 

24 Behold, I have told you before;

 

25 Wherefore, if they shall say unto you: Behold, he is in the desert; go not forth: Behold, he is in the secret chambers; believe it not;

 

26 For as the light of the morning cometh out of the east, and shineth even unto the west, and covereth the whole earth, so shall also the coming of the Son of Man be.

 

27 And now I show unto you a parable. Behold, wheresoever the carcass is, there will the eagles be gathered together; so likewise shall mine elect be gathered from the four quarters of the earth.

 

Conditions preceding 2nd Coming

 

  1. False prophets come soon after the destruction of Jerusalem, verses 21-25
  2. D&C 137:6 – Gather Israel the 2nd time, 1830 organization of the church, 1836 keys given.
  3. D&C 43:17-18, the chronology of the Lord’s warning voice

 

    1. Lord’s servants to warn the world, humble themselves.  Prophets, Apostles, 70’s Missionaries
    2. National disasters, the judgments of God, compel them to be humble
    3. The Lord’s own voice

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 43:17-18.) – The Lord’s warning voice

 

17 Hearken ye, for, behold, the great day of the Lord is nigh at hand.

 

18 For the day cometh that the Lord shall utter his voice out of heaven; the heavens shall shake and the earth shall tremble, and the trump of God shall sound both long and loud, and shall say to the sleeping nations: Ye saints arise and live; ye sinners stay and sleep until I shall call again.

 

 

The Lord’s servants have been sending out warning voices through proclamations, this is the 1st warning voice.  The 2nd warning voices are wars and rumors of wars. 

 

(Joseph Smith-Matthew: 28-33.) – Jerusalem is wicked like the rest of the world and will again be destroyed, the sun and moon will not give their light during its destruction.

 

28 And they shall hear of wars, and rumors of wars.

 

29 Behold I speak for mine elect's sake; for nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom; there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places.

 

30 And again, because iniquity shall abound, the love of men shall wax cold; but he that shall not be overcome, the same shall be saved.

 

31 And again, this Gospel of the Kingdom shall be preached in all the world, for a witness unto all nations, and then shall the end come, or the destruction of the wicked;

 

32 And again shall the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, be fulfilled.

 

33 And immediately after the tribulation of those days, the sun shall be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of heaven shall be shaken.

 

Verses 18 through 21 of Joseph Smith-Matthew seem to be the transitional verses between the events associated with the destruction of Jerusalem at the time of the ancient apostles and the second coming of Christ. Verse 21 tells us that prior to the Second Coming there will again be tribulation upon Jerusalem. Once more there will be false Christs and false prophets who will attempt to deceive the very elect (see JS-M 1:22). President Joseph F. Smith helps us understand the meaning of this verse in a statement of the First Presidency on 2 August 1913, entitled "A Warning Voice."

 

At other times people who pride themselves on their strict observance of the rules and ordinances and ceremonies of the Church are led astray by false spirits, who exercise an influence so imitative of that which proceeds from a Divine source that even these persons, who think they are "the very elect," find it difficult to discern the essential difference. Satan himself has transformed himself to be apparently "an angel of light." fn

 

There will be wars and rumors of wars. This is not to concern us, for this is exactly what the Savior predicted would precede his coming. But the end is not yet (see JS-M 1:23-24). We are not to follow those who try to deceive us when they say Christ is in the desert or in the secret chambers, for the Second Coming will not be done in secret but will be made known to all the earth (see JS-M 1:25-26).

 

As it was with the destruction of the temple at Jerusalem, so the Second Coming will be one of great tribulations and persecutions. Nation will be against nation; there will be famines, pestilences, and earthquakes in many places (see JS-M 1:29). But there will also be the gathering of the elect from the four corners of the earth (see JS~M 1:27JS-M 1:27). There will not only be great physical tribulations but there will be those tribulations within families: iniquity will abound and the love of many will wax cold. We can see how fully this is being fulfilled in our own day. However, if we are not overcome by these problems, the Lord promises us that we will be saved. (See JS-M 1:30.)

 

Another important sign of the Savior's second coming is the preaching of the gospel to all the world—then the end will come, which is the destruction of the wicked (see JS-M 1:30-31). Sometimes Latter-day Saints seem to feel that we have almost accomplished this goal. But, upon more careful examination, the nations who have at this date had missionaries among them represent approximately one-third of the world. There are some very significant nations that we have yet to reach: China, the Soviet Union, most of India and Africa, as well as all those smaller countries that still have not had missionaries in their midst. Truly we must lengthen our stride and accept with greater enthusiasm the call we received from President Spencer W. Kimball for every worthy young man to go on a mission as well as many, many more of our retired couples.

 

Once again there will be the abomination of desolation which was predicted by Daniel (see Daniel 9:27; 11:31; 12:11). Will there once again be terrible destruction upon Jerusalem by invading armies? This will undoubtedly be the time when the two prophets (not young missionaries, but General Authorities who hold the sealing power) will be killed, left to lie in the streets for three and one-half days, and then be resurrected (see Revelation 11:3-13). Immediately following this great tribulation, the sun will be darkened, the moon shall not give her light (other sources talk about the moon turning to blood, becoming as blood, bathed in blood; see Joel 2:31; Revelation 6:12; D&C 45:42; 88:87), and the stars shall fall from heaven (see JS-M 1:33) or refuse to give their light (see Isaiah 13:10; Ezekiel 32:7).

 

This is one of the most universally taught doctrines in all the scriptures, since it is in every standard work of the Church: the Old and New Testaments, the Book of Mormon, Doctrine and Covenants, and the Pearl of Great Price. In the generation that these signs are given, all that Christ has predicted will be fulfilled (see JS-M 1:34). As one reads the account by Josephus of the terrible destruction of the Jews and Jerusalem, one begins to gain an appreciation that the Savior was trying to tell us something about the great tribulation that will once again come upon the earth, this time prior to his second coming.

 

This will also be the generation in which the times of the Gentiles will be fulfilled; that is, their time for receiving the gospel will be over (JST Luke 21:25, 32). This will not be one grand event, but will cover a long period of time—apparently the entire dispensation prior to the Second Coming. Then will come the time for the Jews to again receive the message of salvation. fn

 

Following the great tribulations, which will include the powers of heaven being shaken, there will appear "the sign of the Son of Man" in heaven. This will cause the tribes of the earth to mourn, while the righteous will rejoice when they shall see the Son of Man coming in "the clouds of heaven, with power and great glory" (JS-M 1:36). One is reminded of the great destruction upon the American Continent prior to the first coming of Christ, and also that following this great tribulation came the great joy of seeing Jesus Christ descending from heaven (see 3 Nephi 8-11). We cannot help but feel that this is simply a type and a shadow of things to come. Will the sign of his first coming—the new star, the day and night and day as though it were one day—be the same sign of his second coming? (see Zechariah 14:6-7).

 

There are, however, several things that the righteous must do in order to witness the Second Coming. First, we must treasure up Christ's words which he has given us so that we will not be deceived (see JS-M 1:37). Next, we must watch, pray always, and keep the commandments, so that we may be counted worthy to escape the tribulations that will come, and also that we will be worthy to stand before Christ when he comes (see JST Luke 21:37). The Doctrine and Covenants expresses this a little differently, indicating that we should be looking for the signs of his coming, because he "that watches not for me shall be cut off" (D&C 45:39, 44). We must be like the wise virgins who had oil in their lamps; that is, we must take the Holy Spirit as our guide so we will not be deceived (see Matthew 25:1-13; D&C 45:57). No wonder we are given so much detail about the signs of the coming of Christ, so that we will be watching and thus be ready for this great and dreadful day (great for the righteous and dreadful for the wicked). May we be as ready as were the former-day Saints, those who escaped the terrible destruction of Jerusalem because they watched and obeyed.

 

Before that day the remainder of the elect will be gathered together from "the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other" (JS-M 1:37). To further illustrate this, the Savior told the disciples that two would be in the field, one taken and the other left, and that while two would be grinding at the mill, again one would be taken and one left (see JS-M 1:44-45). Once again the JST clearly explains what Jesus meant by this.

 

Where, Lord, shall they be taken [the disciples asked Jesus]. And he said unto them, Wheresoever the body is gathered; or, in other words, whithersoever the saints are gathered, thither will the eagles be gathered together; or, thither will the remainder be gathered together. This he spake, signifying the gathering of his saints; and of angels descending and gathering the remainder unto them; the one from the bed, the other from the grinding, and the other from the field, whithersoever he listeth. (JST Luke 17:36-38.)

 

To help the apostles understand the signs of the times and their relationship to his coming again on the earth, Jesus gave the parable of the fig tree. When one saw the leaves of the fig tree, he would know that summer was near. So it will be with the elect who are watching for Christ's return to earth: they will know that it is near, "even at the door," by the signs that are given (see JS-M 1:39).

 

 

(Monte S. Nyman and Charles D. Tate, Jr., eds., Joseph Smith Translation: The Restoration of Plain and Precious Things [Provo: BYU Religious Studies Center, 1985], 241 - 242.)

 

 

 

The 3rd Nephi is a type and shadow of what will happen at the 2nd coming.

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 77:15.) – Revelation 11, 2 witnesses prior to Christ’s coming.  Keep attention to the brethren along with a healthy study of the scriptures.

 

15 Q. What is to be understood by the two witnesses, in the eleventh chapter of Revelation?

A. They are two prophets that are to be raised up to the Jewish nation in the last days, at the time of the restoration, and to prophesy to the Jews after they are gathered and have built the city of Jerusalem in the land of their fathers.

 

 

(Joseph Smith-Matthew: 37.) – Angels come before the coming of Christ.  Treasure up God’s word and you won’t be deceived.  The parable of the fig tree

 

37 And whoso treasureth up my word, shall not be deceived, for the Son of Man shall come, and he shall send his angels before him with the great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together the remainder of his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.

 

 

The gospel goes to the entire world by technology and revelation (smaller temples)  President Kimball

 

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 63:53-54.) – The 10 virgins refers to members of the church.  There will be a separation of the wicked and the righteous

 

53 These things are the things that ye must look for; and, speaking after the manner of the Lord, they are now nigh at hand, and in a time to come, even in the day of the coming of the Son of Man.

 

54 And until that hour there will be foolish virgins among the wise; and at that hour cometh an entire separation of the righteous and the wicked; and in that day will I send mine angels to pluck out the wicked and cast them into unquenchable fire.

 

(2 Nephi 30:10.) – In the last days there will be a great division among the people and the wicked will be destroyed

 

10 For the time speedily cometh that the Lord God shall cause a great division among the people, and the wicked will he destroy; and he will spare his people, yea, even if it so be that he must destroy the wicked by fire.

 

 

 

I Testify

President Ezra Taft Benson

 

My beloved brethren and sisters, my heart is full and my feelings tender as we conclude this great general conference of the Church.

We have been richly blessed as we have listened to the counsel and testimonies of those who have spoken to us.

As a special witness of Jesus Christ, and as His humble servant, it is now my obligation and privilege, as the Spirit dictates, to bear pure testimony and witness to that which I know to be true. (See Alma 4:19.) This I will do.

I testify that we are the spirit offspring of a loving God, our Heavenly Father (see Acts 17:29; 1 Ne. 17:36). He has a great plan of salvation whereby His children might be perfected as He is and might have a fulness of joy as He enjoys. (See 1 Ne. 10:18; 2 Ne. 2:25; Alma 24:14; Alma 34:9; 3 Ne. 12:48; 3 Ne. 28:10.)

I testify that in our premortal state our Elder Brother in the spirit, even Jesus Christ, became our foreordained Savior in the Father’s plan of salvation. (See Mosiah 4:6–7; Alma 34:9.) He is the captain of our salvation and the only means through whom we can return to our Father in Heaven to gain that fulness of joy. (See Heb. 2:10; Mosiah 3:17; Alma 38:9.)

I testify that Lucifer was also in the council of heaven. He sought to destroy the agency of man. He rebelled. (See Moses 4:3.) There was a war in heaven, and a third of the hosts were cast to the earth and denied a body. (See Rev. 12:7–9; D&C 29:36–37.) Lucifer is the enemy of all righteousness and seeks the misery of all mankind. (See 2 Ne. 2:18, 27; Mosiah 4:14.)

I testify that all those who come into mortality accepted our Father’s plan. (See Abr. 3:26.) Having proved faithful in their first estate in heaven, they are now subject to the test of mortality in this second estate. That test entails doing all things whatsoever the Lord requires. (See Abr. 3:25.) Those who prove faithful in this second estate will have glory added upon their heads forever and ever. (See Abr. 3:26.)

I testify that God reveals His will to all men through the Light of Christ. (See Moro. 7:16; D&C 93:2; John 1:9.) They receive the additional light of the gift of the Holy Ghost through the laying on of hands by God’s authorized servants following baptism. (See A of F 1:4; D&C 20:41.)

I testify that throughout the ages God has spoken to His children through His prophets. (See Amos 3:7; Hel. 8:13–20.) Only when His children rejected the prophets were the prophets taken out of their midst, and then tragedy followed. (See 1 Ne. 3:17–18; 1 Ne. 7:14; Hel. 13:24–27.)

I testify that Christ was born into mortality with Mary as His mother and our Heavenly Father as His father. (See 1 Ne. 11:18–21; Mosiah 3:8.) He lived a sinless life, providing us a perfect example. (See D&C 45:4; 3 Ne. 12:48; 3 Ne. 27:27.) He worked out the great Atonement, which, through His grace, provides for every soul a resurrection and, for the faithful, the means to become exalted in the celestial kingdom. (See A of F 1:3; 2 Ne. 25:23; Mosiah 4:6–7; Alma 11:41–45; D&C 76:50–70; D&C 132:19.)

I testify that during His mortal ministry Christ established His church on the earth. (See Matt. 16:18; Acts 2:47; 3 Ne. 21:22.) He called and ordained men to be Apostles and prophets with authority so that what they bound on earth would be bound in heaven. (See Matt. 16:19; John 15:16.) They received revelation, which provided new scripture. (See 2 Pet. 1:20–21; D&C 68:4.)

I testify that a world so wicked that it killed the Son of God soon began killing the Apostles and prophets and so plunged itself into a spiritual dark age. (See 2 Thes. 2:2–7.) Scripture ended, apostasy spread, and the church that Christ established during His earthly ministry ceased to exist. (See 2 Ne. 27:4–5.)

I testify that God the Father and His Son, Jesus Christ, appeared to Joseph Smith in the spring of 1820, thus bringing to an end the long night of apostasy (JS—H 1:15–20). To Joseph Smith appeared other beings, including John the Baptist and Peter, James, and John, who ordained him with authority to act in the name of God (see JS—H 1:68–72; D&C 27:5–13). The church and kingdom of God was restored in these latter days, even The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, with all the gifts, rights, powers, doctrines, officers, and blessings of the former-day Church. (See D&C 65; D&C 115:3–4.)

I testify that through the Book of Mormon God has provided for our day tangible evidence that Jesus is the Christ and that Joseph Smith is His prophet. (See D&C 20:8–33.) This other testament of Jesus Christ is a scriptural account of the early inhabitants of America. It was translated by Joseph Smith through the gift and power of God. (See D&C 135:3.) Those who will read and ponder the Book of Mormon and ask our Eternal Father in the name of Christ if it is true may know for themselves of its truthfulness through the power of the Holy Ghost, provided they will ask with a sincere heart, with real intent, having faith in Christ. (See Moro. 10:3–5.)

I testify that America is a choice land. (See 2 Ne. 1:5.) God raised up the founding fathers of the United States of America and established the inspired Constitution. (See D&C 101:77–80.) This was the required prologue for the restoration of the gospel. (See 3 Ne. 21:4.) America will be a blessed land unto the righteous forever and is the base from which God will continue to direct the worldwide latter-day operations of His kingdom. (See 2 Ne. 1:7.)

I testify that there has been, and there is now, and there will be legal successors to the Prophet Joseph Smith who hold the keys of the kingdom of God on earth, even the President of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. (See D&C 21:1–7; D&C 107:91–92; D&C 112:15.) He receives revelation from God to direct His kingdom. Associated with him are others who are prophets, seers, and revelators, even those who make up the presiding quorums of the Church, namely the First Presidency and the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles. (See D&C 112:30.)

I testify that wickedness is rapidly expanding in every segment of our society. (See D&C 1:14–16; D&C 84:49–53.) It is more highly organized, more cleverly disguised, and more powerfully promoted than ever before. Secret combinations lusting for power, gain, and glory are flourishing. A secret combination that seeks to overthrow the freedom of all lands, nations, and countries is increasing its evil influence and control over America and the entire world. (See Ether 8:18–25.)

I testify that the church and kingdom of God is increasing in strength. Its numbers are growing, as is the faithfulness of its faithful members. It has never been better organized or equipped to perform its divine mission.

I testify that as the forces of evil increase under Lucifer’s leadership and as the forces of good increase under the leadership of Jesus Christ, there will be growing battles between the two until the final confrontation. As the issues become clearer and more obvious, all mankind will eventually be required to align themselves either for the kingdom of God or for the kingdom of the devil. As these conflicts rage, either secretly or openly, the righteous will be tested. God’s wrath will soon shake the nations of the earth and will be poured out on the wicked without measure. (See JS—H 1:45; D&C 1:9.) But God will provide strength for the righteous and the means of escape; and eventually and finally truth will triumph. (See 1 Ne. 22:15–23.)

I testify that it is time for every man to set in order his own house both temporally and spiritually. It is time for the unbeliever to learn for himself that this work is true, that The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is the kingdom which Daniel prophesied God would set up in the latter days, never to be destroyed, a stone that would eventually fill the whole earth and stand forever. (See Dan. 2:34–45; D&C 65:2.) It is time for us, as members of the Church, to walk in all the ways of the Lord, to use our influence to make popular that which is sound and to make unpopular that which is unsound. We have the scriptures, the prophets, and the gift of the Holy Ghost. Now we need eyes that will see, ears that will hear, and hearts that will hearken to God’s direction.

I testify that not many years hence the earth will be cleansed. (See D&C 76:41.) Jesus the Christ will come again, this time in power and great glory to vanquish His foes and to rule and reign on the earth. (See D&C 43:26–33.) In due time all men will gain a resurrection and then will face the Master in a final judgment. (See 2 Ne. 9:15, 41.) God will give rewards to each according to the deeds done in the flesh. (See Alma 5:15.)

I testify to you that a fulness of joy can only come through the atonement of Jesus Christ and by obedience to all of the laws and ordinances of the gospel, which are found only in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. (See A of F 1:3.)

To all these things I humbly testify and bear my solemn witness that they are true, and I do so in the name of Him who is the head of this church, even Jesus Christ, amen.

All mankind will need to align themselves either with God or Satan, there will be no neutrality.  The righteous will be tested but God will provide strength.

 

2 Issues will be forefront in the last days:

 

  1. Divinity of Jesus Christ
  2. Family issues, Stability of the family

 

2 Proclamations from President Hinckley and the Apostles

 

The Living Christ and the Proclamation on the Family

 

 

 

 

 

John 1-4

April 4, 2007

 

 

 

THE GOSPEL OF JOHN

Listed below are four themes that are threaded throughout the Gospel of John. These themes are intertwined and support one another. To grasp the message of John' writing, one must search out and follow these four themes through the whole of the Gospel.
 

THEME ONE The Light vs. Darkness Theme

The dual between light (Christ and his ways) and darkness (Satan and the ways of the world) is one of the more obvious themes in the Gospel of John. Examples of this are found in almost every chapter and every page of the Gospel of John.
 

THEME TWO The Water/Life Theme

Water is one of the most significant elements in sustaining life. In the Gospel of John, Christ is shown as having power of water and thus has the power to give living water. Note the following examples:

(1) Christ turns water to wine (John 2)
(2) Christ's discourse on Living Waters at Jacob's well (John 4)
(3) Christ heals the invalid man at the Pools of Bethesda (John 5)
(4) Christ walks on water (John 6)
(5) Christ offers living water during Feast of Tabernacles (John 7)
(6) Christ heals the man born blind at the Pool of Siloam (John 9)
(7) Christ washes the feet of the twelve (John 13)

THEME THREE The Seven Signs and the Seven Discourses
The first half of the Gospel of John is built around seven signs (miracles) and seven discourses. The signs and the discourses seem to be related to each other; the discourses speak of various powers the Savior has that are necessary in helping each child of our Heavenly Father to gain eternal life and the signs or miracles confirms that the Savior has those powers. The seven signs and seven discourses are as follows:

1st SIGN: Water converted to wine (John 2:1-11)
1st DISCOURSE: The natural man converted to the spiritual man (John 3:1-21)

2nd SIGN: Bringing life to the nobleman's son (John 4:46-54)
2nd DISCOURSE: The living waters that bring everlasting life (John 4:1-42)

3rd SIGN: The healing of the invalid on the Sabbath (John 5:1-18)
3rd DISCOURSE: The Divine Son, the Lord of the Sabbath (John 5:19-47)

4th Sign: Miracle feeding of the multitude with bread (John 6:1-15)
4th DISCOURSE: Christ is the bread of life (John 6:22-66)

5th SIGN: Jesus walks on water (John 6:12-21)
5th DISCOURSE: Christ, who will walk into the presence of the Father, offers living water to all (John 7:14-39)

6th SIGN: Healing of the man born blind (John 9)
6th DISCOURSE: Christ is the Light of the World (John 8:12-59)

7th SIGN: The raising of Lazarus from the dead (John 11)
7th DISCOURSE: Christ, the Good Shepherd, will lay down His life for his sheep that he might bring about the resurrection (John 10:1-18)

THEME FOUR The Replacement/Transcendent/Fulfillment Theme

For John, the coming of Christ brought about a replacement, transcendence, and fulfillment of events and places which were held sacred among the Jews. In other words, Christ is the ultimate fulfillment of the sacred events and places of the Old Testament. The following are examples of this theme.

(1) The replacement of the Temple with the body of Christ (either resurrection or body of the Church) (John 2:13-22)
(2) The replacement of the worship in the sacred mountains of Gerizim and Ebal with the worship of Christ (John 4)
(3) The replacement of the Sabbath worship of the Pharisees with the proper worship of the Sabbath taught by Christ (John 5)
(4) The replacement and fulfillment of the Feast of the Passover with Christ, the Bread of life (John 6)
(5) The replacement and fulfillment of the Feast of the Tabernacles with Christ, the light and life of the world (John 7-9)
 

John 1 – Word of Christ = Christ.  “I am” = Christ, John writes very differently then the other apostles, he has themes and images written as stories, signs, and discourses.  Change is a key part of John’s writings, like Elder Bednar’s parable of the pickle, CR April 2007.

 

Theme – Water = Gift of the Holy Ghost

              Truth = Life versus Death

 

THE PROLOGUE OF JOHN (John 1:1-18)

 

J. PHILIP SCHAELLING

 

The Prologue of John (John 1:1-18) has long been favored as a jewel in the crown of biblical scholarship. One author has written: "If John has been described as the pearl of great price among the NT writings, then one may say that the Prologue is the pearl within this Gospel. In her comparison of Augustine's and Chrysostom's exegesis of the prologue, M. A. Aucoin points out that both held that it is beyond the power of man to speak as John does in the Prologue. . . . All these attestations of sublimity, however, do not remove the fact that the eighteen verses of the Prologue contain for the exegete a number of bewildering textual, critical, and interpretative problems." fn

 

Modern revelation can help us with some of these problems, but the Prologue of John is still one of the most intriguing, exciting, challenging, and absolutely transcendent passages ever written. Let no one feel that these eighteen verses carry no depth. They not only have depth—they transcend both time and space to reveal to us the purpose of Christ's ministry. These verses crystallize, in the testimony of one who knew, not only our heritage but also our eternal destiny as children of the living God.

 

John is a witness. His stress is on those things he had seen and experienced himself: "That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked at and our hands have touched—this we proclaim concerning the Word of life." (1 John 1:1, NIV.) The first eighteen verses of his Gospel serve as a prologue. Before John started his actual story, he wanted to give a preview to define the parameters of his account. His purpose was not to catalog all of the deeds and works of the Savior during His mortal life: "If they should be written every one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the books that should be written." (John 21:25.) The Gospel of John is not a hodgepodge of randomly remembered recollections, but a carefully constructed historical account with design and purpose. "That which we have seen and heard declare we unto you, that ye also may have fellowship with us: and truly our fellowship is with the Father, and with his Son Jesus Christ." (1 John 1:3.) A fundamental purpose of John's Gospel is to show us how we can have fellowship with the Father and the Son. The purposes of the Prologue are to summarize that process of achieving fellowship so that we will not miss it as we proceed through the account of the Savior's ministry, and to set the stage for this story of eternal sweep by introducing us to the Savior in his eternal context.

 

Setting the Stage

 

"In the beginning" (1:1). This phrase is identical in the Greek of the Gospel of John with the beginning of the book of Genesis in the Septuagint. There are many "beginnings" in our span of forever. Though we have always existed, there was a "beginning" when we became children of our Heavenly Father; there was a "beginning" when the great premortal council was held and plans for this earth were laid; there was a "beginning" as the creation of this earth was initiated.

 

"Was the Word" (1:1). The word was does not do justice to the Greek verb tense. In Greek, the author could have chosen from either the aorist or the imperfect verb tense. While the aorist refers to a single, completed occurrence, the imperfect defines an ongoing, continuous state. The use of the imperfect tense here defines that which lies beyond time. "In the beginning, place it where you may, the Word already existed. In other words, the Logos is before time, eternal." fn John is telling us that when time began, the Word not only already existed, but the Word already existed in a timeless state, and existed as the "Word."

 

Next we must deal with "Word." In verse 14, the "Word" is identified as the Savior. Would it not have been easier to have said, "In the beginning was Jesus Christ"? Why use the personification? What was John trying to tell us by identifying the Savior as the "Word"? In the English translation, "Word" is probably the best translation of logos, but it is also a very limited translation. Logos is a word replete with nuances and great depth. It can refer to a single word, a phrase, a discussion, or even a whole book. Hugh Nibley uses it in this broad sense when he translates John 1:1 as, "In the beginning was the Logos [counsel, discussion], and the Logos was in the presence of God, and all things were done according to it." fn Many useful articles and books are available that discuss logos. For our purposes, and for the sake of brevity, let us simply note a few aspects of this intriguing word.

 

1. Logos "is never the mere word as an assemblage of sounds, but the word as determined by a meaning and conveying a meaning." fn In other words, it is the outward form that expresses the inner thought.

 

2. While logos does not represent the mere "assemblage of sounds," neither does it represent the thought itself. Logos is tangible, whether it represents "a phrase or sentence, or a prolonged discourse, or even a book." fn

 

3. Logos from God is always dynamic. It does not just exist as a static lump. "The Word is seen to be a heavenly force which creatively accomplishes its work on earth." fn Isaiah referred to the word of God in this same way when he said: "For as the rain cometh down, and the snow from heaven, and returneth not thither, but watereth the earth, and maketh it bring forth and bud, that it may give seed to the sower, and bread to the eater: so shall my word be that goeth forth out of my mouth: it shall not return unto me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please, and it shall prosper in the thing whereto I sent it." (Isa. 55:10-11.) Logos from God always has purpose and always has power.

 

"In the beginning, the logos already existed." The reason for the personification is to help us understand that Christ was to be the outward expression of the Father's inner nature, having the same purpose and the same power. This principle helps us to better comprehend the Savior's statement to Philip, "He that hath seen me hath seen the Father" (John 14:9) and gives new depth to the following passage: "Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in me? the words that I speak unto you I speak not of myself: but the Father that dwelleth in me, he doeth the works. Believe me that I am in the Father, and the Father in me." (John 14:10-11.)

 

John's introduction helps us understand that Jesus, in fulfilling his destiny in the eternal plan of salvation, was the dynamic expression of the Father's inner being. He was and is, since before the beginning, the actor and doer of the Father's will, filled with his purpose and power. While on earth, he was the visible expression of his Father's inner nature. If we wish to learn more about the Father, we merely need to learn more about his Son. Through Joseph Smith much of this concept was revealed in modern times: "He was the Word, even the messenger of salvation." (D&C 93:8.) The Plan of Salvation is eternal, and for us, the embodiment of that plan is Jesus Christ.

 

"And the Word was with God" (1:1). "The word with (in the Greek), while emphasizing the communion of the Logos with God, yet safeguards the idea of his individual personality: it expresses nearness combined with the sense of movement towards God, and so indicates an active relationship. The Logos and God do not simply exist side by side, but are on terms of living intercourse, and such fellowship implies separate personality." fn

 

"And the Word was God" (1:1). In the Greek, the word God comes first in this phrase, which gives it special emphasis. Though it comes first, it is predicative and without an article. This means that John wanted us to know that in the beginning, the logos had already achieved Godhood: He had developed within himself the divine nature. By this we do not merely mean that he developed a divine nature. The absence of the article implies that he has acquired the very same character and divine attributes as The God with whom he associated in the previous phrase. The emphatic arrangement of this word gives special stature to the logos. Not only was Jesus to be the one who would actively implement the plan of our Father, not only did he have a close and personal fellowship with the Father, but "in the beginning" the Savior had already developed the very same attributes and character of the Father, thus attaining Godhood.

 

"The same was in the beginning with [the] God" (1:2). I have placed a bracketed the here simply to mirror John's emphasis; the word the exists in the Greek text. John has wanted to communicate clearly that while the logos has developed the qualities of the Father, he is also a distinct and separate individual. The repetition and structure of this phrase is so emphatic that it may imply an attempt by John to address any misunderstanding or confusion on the doctrine of the trinity within the early church. This is a very difficult thing to translate because the absence or presence of articles (that is, the) in English does not communicate the same thing as it does in Greek.

 

Thus we can see that there are three things that John wanted to establish in these first two verses:

 

1. Jesus Christ was to be the outward and dynamic expression of both his Father's essence and his Father's will.

 

2. Jesus was eminently suited to this task, for he had developed the very same character and attributes as His Father.

 

3. We should not confuse the issue and think that they are the same individual. They are clearly separate.

 

Achieving Fellowship

 

After John established the majesty of the logos in its premortal eternal state, he gave us a brief outline of how the logos fits into the plan of salvation. This is divided into three stages:

 

1. John 1:3-9: The existence of light as a fundamental part of the logos, which he shares freely with all who come into the world.

 

2. John 1:10-13: Our free agency to accept him or reject him, and the right and power given to those who accept him to become children of God.

 

3. John 1:14-17: The actual achievement of that relationship, together with an emphasis on the Savior as role model and the very embodiment of those principles which develop our capacity to be sons and daughters.

 

The Light

 

"And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not" (1:5). As soon as John identified light with logos, he informed us that a great rivalry exists in the universe between the logos and "the Prince of Darkness." Light and darkness are active elements and are personified, as was logos. John did this to help us identify certain basic principles that pertain to the individuals thus personified. In this very powerful verse, he encapsulated one of the fundamental dramas of his entire narrative, the struggle that inherently exists between good and evil.

 

In King James's time, the word comprehend could mean either "to seize, grasp, lay hold of, catch," or "to grasp, take in, or apprehend with the senses." fn The Greek word from which it is translated has the basic meaning of seizing with hostile intent, or overtaking. In one verb voice, not used here, it can also be used to express an ability to understand or perceive. Certainly it is imperative that we develop the capacity to perceive the light. But in the only other place where John used this word, it was again in relationship to darkness, and assumes the active role of "to seize with hostile intent, to overtake": "Walk while ye have the light, lest darkness come upon you." (John 12:35.) "In these cases the sense cannot be doubtful. The darkness comes down upon, enwraps men. As applied to light, this sense includes the further notion of overwhelming, eclipsing. The relation of darkness to light is one of essential antagonism." fn Another interesting contrast is offered in this verse. The verb shineth is given in the timeless present tense, while the verb comprehended is in a tense that is used for a given point in time. The effect of this contrast is to say that this dispelling of darkness is an inherent and enduring quality of light and of the One who is personified as light. On the other hand, there was a time when the darkness, or the one of whom it is a personification, attempted to seize and overcome the light. It refers to a specific attempt, a single occurrence, not an ongoing, timeless quality. John was foreshadowing a main theme of his Gospel: a record of the specific time when, as the light shone in the darkness that had come upon this world, the Prince of Darkness attempted and failed to overcome and extinguish that light. A major effort of his Gospel is to mirror and witness the dynamic conflict between light and dark which was to culminate in the Savior's dynamic victory.

 

"That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world" (1:9). It is as though we are all in a huge arena, in total darkness, searching for a way out. Some panic, some give up, many search aimlessly, all are lost. Suddenly someone opens a door and the light shines in. He is the light that shines in the darkness! Now we can find our way out! Now we can go back home! He shows us the way and helps us be sensitive to the light. He also places within each of us our own little light, so that we can always see in the darkness. But it works only if we follow that light: "And he that repents not, from him shall be taken even the light which he has received." (D&C 1:33.) The possession of light gives us the ability to see our way out of the darkness of this world and find our way back to our Father in heaven. This understanding of light harbors intriguing implications in the definition of intelligence as found in D&C 93:36-39.

 

Becoming Children of God

 

"And the world knew him not" (1:10). The word translated knew can mean either perceive, realize or acknowledge, recognize. fn

 

"And his own received him not" (1:11). The word translated received, in this context, means to accept. fn

 

"To them gave he power" (1:12). The word translated power "does not describe mere ability, but legitimate, rightful authority, derived from a competent source which includes the idea of power." fn

 

"To become the sons of God, even to them that believe" (1:12). The word tekna, here translated as sons, is a neuter form and simply means children, without reference to gender. fn A contrast is here drawn between the first phrase and the last by the use of different verb tenses. The phrase "to become" is in the aorist tense, meaning that it is a specific event. The phrase "to them that believe" is in the present tense, implying an ongoing condition. The thrust of the passage is that becoming a child of God occurs only to those for whom belief has become an ongoing part of their very nature.

 

A word or two about the word believe is also appropriate. In the New Testament, the words belief and faith are used as translations for a single Greek word, pistis. Pistis in this sense is a "faith in the Divinity that lays special emphasis on trust in his power and his nearness to help, in addition to being convinced that he exists and that his revelations or disclosures are true." fn This describes what happens when we trust him to such an extent that we simply do whatever he tells us and refuse to do that which he tells us not to do. It is to such people that he gives both the right and the power to become "children of God."

 

"Which were born . . . of God" (1:13). Verse 13 amplifies the principle of belief or faith and causes the term to apply only to those who so thoroughly reconstruct their lives that they are no longer children of this world, but children of God. Elder Bruce R. McConkie described it as follows: "Those who are sons of God (meaning the Father) are persons who, first, receive the gospel, join the true Church, obtain the priesthood, marry for eternity, and walk in obedience to the whole gospel law. They are then adopted into the family of Jesus Christ, become joint-heirs with him, and consequently receive, inherit, and possess equally with him in glorious exaltation in the kingdom of his Father." fn

 

"And the Word was made flesh" (1:14). As a mortal man, the Lord Jesus was subject to all of the trials, tribulations, temptations, and vicissitudes of mortality. fn

 

"And we beheld his glory" (1:14). The word translated beheld means more than merely to see. It means that one has carefully observed. For this reason, one translator, attempting to bring out the full meaning, has rendered it: "And we gazed with attentive and careful regard and spiritual perception." fn

 

"The glory as of the only begotten of the Father" (1:14). Glory is being used here to describe the relationship that John had observed to exist between the Father and the Son. The Greek word used here, doxa, has as one of its base meanings opinion. When applied to another, it means "the opinion which others have of one, estimation, repute." fn In the New Testament it is also used to represent radiance or splendor, but its use here refers to the esteem that the Father holds for His Son. John wrote that during the mortal life of Christ, he (John), along with others, was able to observe the special relationship that existed between the Father and the Son, along with the esteem and honor given to Jesus by the Father. This is reinforced often in his account: "For the Father judgeth no man, but hath committed all judgment unto the Son: that all men should honour the Son, even as they honour the Father" (5:22-23). "As the Father hath life in himself; so hath he given to the Son to have life in himself; and hath given him authority to execute judgment also, because he is the Son of man" (5:26-27). "The Father hath not left me alone; for I do always those things that please him" (8:29). "I and my Father are one" (10:30). "Father, I will that they also, whom thou hast given me, be with me where I am; that they may behold my glory, which thou hast given me: for thou lovedst me before the foundation of the world" (17:24).

 

In the first verse of his Gospel, John tells us about the strong and special relationship between the Father and the Son. In this phrase he desires us to know that he personally witnessed this special relationship.

 

"Full of grace and truth" (1:14). When John observed that the Savior is full of grace and truth, it of course means that nothing exists in him that is not composed of these elements. There is no untruth in him, and there is nothing that does not partake of grace. The Greek word translated as grace is a challenging word to grasp, with many meanings and nuances. In the secular usage of this period, this word charis was employed as "a fixed term for demonstrations of a ruler's favour." fn In earlier antiquity it represented "the 'favour' of the gods." fn Some help in understanding this verse is given in verse 17 as John contrasted the law of Moses with the grace and truth that comes by Jesus Christ. The law of Moses was strict justice. Through Christ we receive the benefit of his love for us as a free gift. Though we must qualify for that gift, we in no way earn it; this gift is so glorious that it is far beyond our capacity to earn. In describing the Savior as being "full of grace," John wanted us to know that there exists in him nothing but pure, selfless love for us, which he gives freely and with joy whenever he can. Being "in His grace" also implies that we have special access to him and that he is readily available to listen to our needs.

 

"And of his fulness have all we received, and grace for grace" (1:16). This phrase described the process by which we acquire the same qualities and character as the Savior. It can be translated to mean that we can receive either "grace upon grace" or "grace in exchange for grace." In the Doctrine and Covenants we find this same phrase applied to Jesus and including both meanings. "And I, John, saw that he received not of the fulness at the first, but received grace for grace; And he received not of the fulness at first, but continued from grace to grace, until he received a fulness." (D&C 93:12-13, emphasis added.)

 

In the phrase "grace for grace," we understand that as we reach out with love and joy to bless freely those around us, we are blessed freely and with joy from above. As we give grace, we receive grace.

 

In addition, we move from "grace to grace." The Lord does not wait until we have developed the quality of grace fully before bestowing blessings upon us, but lets us move from level to level. We are always in his favor, but as we develop we are blessed accordingly. When no feeling exists within us except the desire to bless and bring joy, then he can reach out and bestow upon us that fellowship which brings a fullness of joy. "Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also which shall believe on me through their word; that they all may be one; as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us." (John 17:20-21.)

 

As we have seen, verses 3 to 17 of chapter 1 take us through our eternal development in three stages:

 

1. Our relationship with the Light,

 

2. The rebirth and our use of agency, and

 

3. The process of "grace for grace" as we partake of his fullness.

 

The same sequence is mirrored in the actual record of John's Gospel. It begins with the witness to the Light (John the Baptist) that is so strongly stressed in verses 6 to 9 of the Prologue, then continues with the great rebirth discourse given to Nicodemus. John expands this with illustrations of how some reject the light and others accept it with faith. This section makes up a large portion of his record and includes stories of great faith as well as some of the great discourses and discussions with the Pharisees and Sadducees. John vividly portrays the love and compassion of the Savior and his greatness as a teacher, as he records the Savior's discourses on the choices that exist for all of us in this world. This section is followed by the only detailed account of the proceedings of the Last Supper, in which the Savior revealed to his disciples the great law of love: the foundation of grace. The structural organization of the Prologue mirrors the structural organization of John's Gospel.

 

Knowing the Father Through Christ

 

"No man hath seen God at any time" (1:18). Joseph Smith added, "except he hath borne record of the Son" (JST, 1:19). President Spencer W. Kimball noted: "It is noteworthy that the Father, God, Elohim came to the earth upon each necessary occasion to introduce the Son to a new dispensation, to a new people; then Jesus Christ, the Son, carried forward his work. This has happened again in our own dispensation when both separate beings, the Father and the Son, came again to the earth in person and appeared unto man. This holy occurrence was described by the devout and prepared young man who was the principal recipient of the vision." fn This highlights the point brought out in verse 1, that we are to learn of the Father through the Son.

 

"The only begotten Son" (1:18). The oldest and best ancient manuscript read, "the only begotten God." fn

 

"Which is in the bosom of the Father" (1:18). "The image is used of the closest and tenderest of human relationships, of mother and child (Num. xi. 12), and of husband and wife (Deut. xiii. 6), and also of friends reclining side by side at a feast (comp. xiii. 23), and so describes the ultimate fellowship of love. The exact form of the words is remarkable. The phrase is not strictly 'in the bosom,' but 'into the bosom.' Thus there is the combination (as it were) of rest and motion, of a continuous relation, with a realization of it." fn

 

"He hath declared him" (1:18). The Greek word translated declared means to "explain, interpret, tell, report, describe." fn John completed the Prologue with a restatement of the thought with which he began it. The purpose of Christ's ministry was to reveal to us the essential character of the Father and to dynamically bring about his plan. Through Jesus, we can learn about the Father's plan, discover his design for our personal destiny, see his power, and feel his love for us. Jesus is the visible personification of the Father. Jesus is the Word. fn

 

NOTES

 

J. Philip Schaelling is an instructor at the LDS Institute of Religion in McAllen, Texas.

 

Footnotes

 

1. Raymond E. Brown, The Gospel According to John, I-XII, Anchor Bible 29 (Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday & Co., 1966), p. 18.

 

2. M. Dods, "The Gospel of St. John," The Expositor's Greek Testament, W. Robertson Nicoll, ed. (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 1974), 1:683.

 

3. Hugh Nibley, Nibley on the Timely and the Timeless (Provo, Utah: Religious Studies Center, Brigham Young University, 1978), p. 282.

 

4. C. H. Dodd, The Interpretation of the Fourth Gospel (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1965), p. 263.

 

5. Ibid.

 

6. O. Procksch, "Lego," in Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, G. Kittel, ed., 10 vols. (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 1967), 4:98.

 

7. G. H. C. Macgregor, "The Gospel of John" in The Moffatt New Testament Commentary, James Moffatt, ed. (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1949), 4:4.

 

8. The Oxford English Dictionary (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1933), 2:741.

 

9. Brooke Foss Westcott, The Gospel According to St. John (London: John Murray, 1908), 1:9.

 

10. Walter Bauer, A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament, trans. W. F. Arndt and F. W. Gingrich, 2nd ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979), p. 161.

 

11. Ibid., p. 619.

 

12. Westcott, p. 16.

 

13. Bauer, p. 808.

 

14. Ibid., p. 665.

 

15. Bruce R. McConkie, Doctrinal New Testament Commentary, 3 vols. (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1965-73), 1:74.

 

16. Ibid., p. 75.

 

17. Kenneth S. Wuest, The New Testament: An Expanded Translation (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 1961), p. 209.

 

18. Henry George Liddell and Robert Scott, A Greek-English Lexicon (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1925), p. 444.

 

19. Gerhard Friedrich, "Charis," Theological Dictionary of the New Testament (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 1974), 9:375.

 

20. Ibid., 9:374.

 

21. Spencer W. Kimball, Conference Report, October 1977, p. 112.

 

22. Dods, p. 691.

 

23. Westcott, p. 28.

 

24. Bauer, p. 275.

 

25. For a discussion of the mission of John the Baptist, see Robert J. Matthews, "A Voice in the Wilderness: An Interview with John the Baptist," chapter 9 in this volume.

 

 

(Kent P. Jackson and Robert L. Millet, eds., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 5: The Gospels [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1986], 127.)

 

John 2 – Change is one of the themes of the chapter

 

1-11 – Change water to wine

12 – Change where He lives

13-17 – Change what happens in the temple, cleanses the temple

18 – Change the temple in 3 days (His body) – Also it is necessary for us to make this change in ourselves.

 

 

(John 2:1-11.) – Water to wine.  Christ and the disciples are invited to a 7 day marriage feast.  His mother Mary is involved, they have no more wine, Mary has total faith in her son, and he fulfills her request willingly.  His focus is not yet on building up the kingdom or his earthly mission, this comes later on.  The governor talks to the Bridegroom who is not Jesus.  He manifests His glory and the disciples believe in Him.

 

1 And the third day there was a marriage in Cana of Galilee; and the mother of Jesus was there:

 

2 And both Jesus was called, and his disciples, to the marriage.

 

3 And when they wanted wine, the mother of Jesus saith unto him, They have no wine.

 

4 Jesus saith unto her, Woman, what have I to do with thee? mine hour is not yet come.

 

5 His mother saith unto the servants, Whatsoever he saith unto you, do it.

 

6 And there were set there six waterpots of stone, after the manner of the purifying of the Jews, containing two or three firkins apiece.

 

7 Jesus saith unto them, Fill the waterpots with water. And they filled them up to the brim.

 

8 And he saith unto them, Draw out now, and bear unto the governor of the feast. And they bare it.

 

9 When the ruler of the feast had tasted the water that was made wine, and knew not whence it was: (but the servants which drew the water knew;) the governor of the feast called the bridegroom,

 

10 And saith unto him, Every man at the beginning doth set forth good wine; and when men have well drunk, then that which is worse: but thou hast kept the good wine until now.

 

11 This beginning of miracles did Jesus in Cana of Galilee, and manifested forth his glory; and his disciples believed on him.

 

Concrete principles – Glory = God’s power – intelligence – light – truth – life – law

 

D&C 88:6, 8 93:36 = Intelligence = light and truth = light of Christ, Power >>> Life >>> Law

 

(Moses 1:2.) – Because the glory of God was there, Moses could endure God’s presence

 

2 And he saw God face to face, and he talked with him, and the glory of God was upon Moses; therefore Moses could endure his presence.

 

 

(Moses 1:11.) – The glory of God transfigured Moses so he could behold God.

                               

11 But now mine own eyes have beheld God; but not my natural, but my spiritual eyes, for my natural eyes could not have beheld; for I should have withered and died in his presence; but his glory was upon me; and I beheld his face, for I was transfigured before him.

 

 

(Moses 1:39.) – His work and power is for our benefit, total unselfishness on His part

 

39 For behold, this is my work and my glory—to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of man.

 

 

The three kingdoms of glory = capacity to do, they are levels of capacity.  In John Christ is showing forth His power and capacity.

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 93:18-19.) – How to worship and What to worship.  The unity of the Father and the Son is much greater then we think, it is more then unity of just purpose, it is unity in purpose and power.

 

18 And it shall come to pass, that if you are faithful you shall receive the fulness of the record of John.

 

19 I give unto you these sayings that you may understand and know how to worship, and know what you worship, that you may come unto the Father in my name, and in due time receive of his fulness.

 

On the cross the oneness was gone because God left Christ alone, so through His extreme suffering He overcame His natural man body alone.  He shows us the way, since we also need to overcome our natural man tendencies.

Since we have a relationship with Elohim as the father of our spirits and with Christ as the father of our spiritual birth, we may wonder how those two relationships differ from one another. For one thing, Christ is our advocate with the Father, suggesting that when the Father is our judge, Christ pleads our case before him. fn In addition, in modern revelation the Lord has suggested that our relationship with Christ may somehow parallel his relationship with the Father. He teaches us that we "may understand and know how to worship, and know what you worship, that you may come unto the Father in my name, and in due time receive of his fulness. For if you keep my commandments you shall receive of his fulness, and be glorified in me as I am in the Father." (D&C 93:19-20.) Clearly, as we come to Christ, he helps us come to the Father.

 

As we come to the Savior in this spirit, we are initially forgiven of our sins, with the Atonement satisfying the law of justice. fn Then we receive the sanctifying power of the Holy Ghost, which cleanses us from the effects of our sins. Since no unclean thing may dwell in God's presence, this cleansing is essential to our regaining his presence, both now and eternally. Still largely through the medium of the Holy Ghost, our covenant-based and Atonement-based relationship with Christ goes on to bless us with the affirmative endowments of hope fn and charity, fn gifts that are extended and bestowed as Christ, the father of our reborn spirits, guides and nourishes each of us toward a Christlike nature. In addition, the same power that compensates for and heals us from the effects of our conscious sins also compensates for and heals us from the same kinds of effects—the pain, the bitterness, the sorrow—caused by our unintentional mistakes and the natural adversities we suffer. fn

 

 

(Bruce C. Hafen and Marie K. Hafen, The Belonging: The Atonement and Relationships with God and Family Heart [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1994], 152.)

 

 

The Savior's personal experience is clarified by the witness of John, as contained in modern revelation. Note the role of the Father's grace in his development, which he in turn extends to his followers: "And I, John, saw that [Christ] received not of the fulness at the first, but received grace for grace . . . until he received a fulness." (D&C 93:12-13.) Now Christ himself speaks to us: "I give unto you these sayings that you may understand and know how to worship, and know what you worship, that you may come unto the Father in my name, and in due time receive of his fulness. For if you keep my commandments you shall receive of his fulness, and be glorified in me as I am in the Father; therefore, I say unto you, you shall receive grace for grace." (D&C 93:19D&C 93:19-20; emphasis added.)

 

When the laws of justice and mercy are satisfied by the Atonement and by our repentance, we are, in effect, free from sin. But just as the sinless Christ was "made perfect" through interaction with his Father's grace, so we must then move beyond the remission of sins to the perfection of a divine nature by a process involving grace.

 

Not long before he passed away, Elder Bruce R. McConkie visited Ricks College to deliver a devotional talk. As we drove together toward the campus from the airport, I asked Elder McConkie if he thought the concepts of grace and the Lord's Atonement had anything to do with the affirmative process of perfecting our nature—apart from the connection of those concepts with forgiveness of sin.

 

He said that is what the scriptures teach. Turning to the Doctrine and Covenants, he read aloud from Joseph Smith's description of those in the celestial kingdom: "These are they who are just men made perfect through Jesus the mediator of the new covenant, who wrought out this perfect atonement through the shedding of his own blood." (D&C 76:69; emphasis added.) In the same section we read this echo of the ninety-third section: "They are they . . . who have received of [the Father's] fulness." (D&C 76:56; emphasis added.) I thought about these ideas when Elder McConkie told the Ricks students later that day that the Atonement compensates for all the effects of the Fall and makes possible our inheritance of God's quality of life—eternal life.

 

At the very end of the Book of Mormon, Moroni describes this perfecting grace in a final, stirring invitation to his readers: "Yea, come unto Christ, and be perfected in him, and deny yourselves of all ungodliness; and if ye shall deny yourselves of all ungodliness, and love God with all your might, mind and strength, then is his grace sufficient for you, that by his grace ye may be perfect in Christ . . . And again, if ye by the grace of God are perfect in Christ, and deny not his power, then are ye sanctified in Christ by the grace of God, through the shedding of the blood of Christ, which is in the covenant of the Father." (Moroni 10:32-33.)

 

 

(Bruce C. Hafen, The Broken Heart: Applying the Atonement to Life's Experiences [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1989], 16.)

 

 

D&C 93:1-39 – Doctrinal base (Behind the reproof He is about to give)

 

D&C 93:40 – Reproof – Not teaching the family (children) correct doctrine as your 1st priority

 

 

(Alma 37:37-38.) – Night is dangerous, pray for the watchman to look over us.  90% of transgression happens at night

 

37 Counsel with the Lord in all thy doings, and he will direct thee for good; yea, when thou liest down at night lie down unto the Lord, that he may watch over you in your sleep; and when thou risest in the morning let thy heart be full of thanks unto God; and if ye do these things, ye shall be lifted up at the last day.

 

38 And now, my son, I have somewhat to say concerning the thing which our fathers call a ball, or director—or our fathers called it Liahona, which is, being interpreted, a compass; and the Lord prepared it.

 

I Samuel 11, Isaiah 21:11, 59:10, Ephesians 6.  Purpose of a curfew

 

(John 3:1-5.) – A visit at night, the truth of verse 3 that the world cannot understand.  Ordinances are needed (1. Baptism 2.  Gift of the Holy Ghost) the spiritual rebirth process takes time to finalize.  If someone wants to change,  the power is within the water (Baptism) and the light (Gift of the Holy Ghost).

 

1 There was a man of the Pharisees, named Nicodemus, a ruler of the Jews:

 

2 The same came to Jesus by night, and said unto him, Rabbi, we know that thou art a teacher come from God: for no man can do these miracles that thou doest, except God be with him.

 

3 Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.

 

4 Nicodemus saith unto him, How can a man be born when he is old? can he enter the second time into his mother's womb, and be born?

 

5 Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.

 

From scriptures and prayers we get access to the living water of the Holy Ghost.  We need to have the Holy Ghost, but we also need to be clean to receive the gift.

 

Ye Must Be Born Again

Elder David A. Bednar
Of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles

Through faith in Christ, we can be spiritually prepared and cleansed from sin, immersed in and saturated with His gospel, and purified and sealed by the Holy Spirit of Promise.

My boyhood home in California was located relatively close to large orchards of apricots, cherries, peaches, pears, and other delicious fruits. We also lived near fields of cucumbers, tomatoes, and a variety of vegetables.

As a boy I always looked forward to canning season. I did not like scrubbing the canning jars or working in our hot kitchen. But I did like working with my mom and dad. And I loved eating my work! I am sure I ate more fruit than ever made it into any of our canning jars.

My memories of time spent in the kitchen with Mom and Dad are stirred every time I see a bottle of home-canned cherries or peaches. The basic lessons I learned about temporal self-reliance and provident living while picking and canning produce have blessed me throughout my life. Interestingly, simple and ordinary experiences often provide the most important learning opportunities we ever have.

As an adult I have reflected upon the things I observed in our kitchen during canning season. This morning I want to discuss some of the spiritual lessons we can learn from the process by which a cucumber becomes a pickle. I invite the Holy Ghost to be with us as we consider the significance of those lessons for me and for you as we come unto Christ and are spiritually reborn.


Cucumbers and Pickles

A pickle is a cucumber that has been transformed according to a specific recipe and series of steps. The first steps in the process of changing a cucumber into a pickle are preparing and cleaning. I remember many hours spent on the back porch of my home removing stems from and scrubbing dirt off of the cucumbers we had picked. My mom was very particular about the preparing and cleaning of the cucumbers. She had high standards of cleanliness and always inspected my work to make sure this important task was properly completed.

The next steps in this process of change are immersing and saturating the cucumbers in salt brine for an extended period of time. To prepare the brine, my mom always used a recipe she learned from her mother—a recipe with special ingredients and precise procedures. Cucumbers can only become pickles if they are totally and completely immersed in the brine for the prescribed time period. The curing process gradually alters the composition of the cucumber and produces the transparent appearance and distinctive taste of a pickle. An occasional sprinkle of or dip in the brine cannot produce the necessary transformation. Rather, steady, sustained, and complete immersion is required for the desired change to occur.

The final step in the process requires the sealing of the cured pickles in jars that have been sterilized and purified. The pickles are packed in canning jars, covered with boiling hot brine, and processed in a boiling-water-bath canner. All impurities must be removed from both the pickles and the bottles so the finished product can be protected and preserved. As this procedure is properly followed, the pickles can be stored and enjoyed for a long period of time.

To summarize, a cucumber becomes a pickle as it is prepared and cleaned, immersed in and saturated with salt brine, and sealed in a sterilized container. This procedure requires time and cannot be hurried, and none of the essential steps can be ignored or avoided.


A Mighty Change

The Lord's authorized servants repeatedly teach that one of the principal purposes of our mortal existence is to be spiritually changed and transformed through the Atonement of Jesus Christ. Alma declared:

"Marvel not that all mankind, yea, men and women, all nations, kindreds, tongues and people, must be born again; yea, born of God, changed from their carnal and fallen state, to a state ofrighteousness, being redeemed of God, becoming his sons and daughters;

"And thus they become new creatures; and unless they do this, they can in nowise inherit the kingdom of God" (Mosiah 27:25–26).

We are instructed to "come unto Christ, and be perfected in him, and deny [ourselves] of all ungodliness" (Moroni 10:32), to become "new creature[s]" in Christ (see 2 Corinthians 5:17), to put off "the natural man" (Mosiah 3:19), and to experience "a mighty change in us, or in our hearts, that we have no more disposition to do evil, but to do good continually" (Mosiah 5:2). Please note that the conversion described in these verses is mighty, not minor—a spiritual rebirth and fundamental change of what we feel and desire, what we think and do, and what we are. Indeed, the essence of the gospel of Jesus Christ entails a fundamental and permanent change in our very nature made possible through our reliance upon "the merits, and mercy, and grace of the Holy Messiah" (2 Nephi 2:8). As we choose to follow the Master, we choose to be changed—to be spiritually reborn.


Preparing and Cleaning

Just as a cucumber must be prepared and cleaned before it can be changed into a pickle, so you and I can be prepared with "the words of faith and of good doctrine" (1 Timothy 4:6) and initially cleansed through the ordinances and covenants administered by the authority of the Aaronic Priesthood.

"And the lesser priesthood continued, which priesthood holdeth the key of the ministering of angels and the preparatory gospel;

"Which gospel is the gospel of repentance and of baptism, and the remission of sins" (D&C 84:26–27).

And the Lord has established a high standard of cleanliness.

"Wherefore teach it unto your children, that all men, everywhere, must repent, or they can in nowise inherit the kingdom of God, for no unclean thing can dwell there, or dwell in his presence" (Moses 6:57).

Proper preparing and cleaning are the first basic steps in the process of being born again.


Immersing and Saturating

Just as a cucumber is transformed into a pickle as it is immersed in and saturated with salt brine, so you and I are born again as we are absorbed by and in the gospel of Jesus Christ. As we honor and "observe the covenants" (D&C 42:13) into which we have entered, as we "feast upon the words of Christ" (2 Nephi 32:3), as we "pray unto the Father with all the energy of heart" (Moroni 7:48), and as we "serve [God] with all [of our] heart, might, mind and strength" (D&C 4:2), then:

"Because of the covenant which ye have made ye shall be called the children of Christ, his sons, and his daughters; for behold, this day he hath spiritually begotten you; for ye say that your hearts are changed through faith on his name; therefore, ye are born of him and have become his sons and his daughters" (Mosiah 5:7).

The spiritual rebirth described in this verse typically does not occur quickly or all at once; it is an ongoing process—not a single event. Line upon line and precept upon precept, gradually and almost imperceptibly, our motives, our thoughts, our words, and our deeds become aligned with the will of God. This phase of the transformation process requires time, persistence, and patience.

A cucumber only becomes a pickle through steady, sustained, and complete immersion in salt brine. Significantly, salt is the key ingredient in the recipe. Salt frequently is used in the scriptures as a symbol both of a covenant and of a covenant people. And just as salt is essential in transforming a cucumber into a pickle, so covenants are central to our spiritual rebirth.

We begin the process of being born again through exercising faith in Christ, repenting of our sins, and being baptized by immersion for the remission of sins by one having priesthood authority.

"Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life" (Romans 6:4).

And after we come out of the waters of baptism, our souls need to be continuously immersed in and saturated with the truth and the light of the Savior's gospel. Sporadic and shallow dipping in the doctrine of Christ and partial participation in His restored Church cannot produce the spiritual transformation that enables us to walk in a newness of life. Rather, fidelity to covenants, constancy of commitment, and offering our whole soul unto God are required if we are to receive the blessings of eternity.

"I would that ye should come unto Christ, who is the Holy One of Israel, and partake of his salvation, and the power of his redemption. Yea, come unto him, and offer your whole souls as an offering unto him, and continue in fasting and praying, and endure to the end; and as the Lord liveth ye will be saved" (Omni 1:26).

Total immersion in and saturation with the Savior's gospel are essential steps in the process of being born again.


Purifying and Sealing

Cured cucumbers are packed into sterilized jars and heat processed in order to remove impurities and to seal the containers from external contaminants. The boiling-water-bath procedure enables the pickles to be both protected and preserved over a long period of time. In a similar way, we progressively become purified and sanctified as you and I are washed in the blood of the Lamb, are born again, and receive the ordinances and honor the covenants that are administered by the authority of the Melchizedek Priesthood.

"Nevertheless they did fast and pray oft, and did wax stronger and stronger in their humility, and firmer and firmer in the faith of Christ, unto the filling their souls with joy and consolation, yea, even to the purifying and the sanctification of their hearts, which sanctification cometh because of their yielding their hearts unto God" (Helaman 3:35).

The word sealing in my message today does not refer exclusively to the ordinance of eternal marriage performed in the house of the Lord. Rather, I am using this particular word as explained in the 76th section of the Doctrine and Covenants:

"This is the testimony of the gospel of Christ concerning them who shall come forth in the resurrection of the just—

"They are they who received the testimony of Jesus, and believed on his name and were baptized after the manner of his burial, being buried in the water in his name, and this according to the commandment which he has given—

"That by keeping the commandments they might be washed and cleansed from all their sins, and receive the Holy Spirit by the laying on of the hands of him who is ordained and sealed unto this power;

"And who overcome by faith, and are sealed by the Holy Spirit of promise, which the Father sheds forth upon all those who are just and true" (vv. 50–53).

The Holy Spirit of Promise is the ratifying power of the Holy Ghost. When sealed by the Holy Spirit of Promise, an ordinance, vow, or covenant is binding on earth and in heaven. (See D&C 132:7.) Receiving this "stamp of approval" from the Holy Ghost is the result of faithfulness, integrity, and steadfastness in honoring gospel covenants "in [the] process of time" (Moses 7:21). However, this sealing can be forfeited through unrighteousness and transgression.

Purifying and sealing by the Holy Spirit of Promise constitute the culminating steps in the process of being born again.


"In the Energy of My Soul"

My beloved brothers and sisters, I pray this parable of the pickle may help us to evaluate our lives and to better understand the eternal importance of spiritual rebirth. With Alma, "I speak in the energy of my soul" (Alma 5:43).

"I say unto you that this is the order after which I am called, yea, to preach unto my beloved brethren, yea, and every one that dwelleth in the land; yea, to preach unto all, both old and young, both bond and free; yea, I say unto you the aged, and also the middle aged, and the rising generation; yea, to cry unto them that they must repent and be born again" (Alma 5:49).

I witness the reality and divinity of a living Savior who invites us to come unto Him and be transformed. I testify His Church and priesthood authority have been restored through the Prophet Joseph Smith. Through faith in Christ, we can be spiritually prepared and cleansed from sin, immersed in and saturated with His gospel, and purified and sealed by the Holy Spirit of Promise—even born again. In the sacred name of Jesus Christ, amen.

John 4 – The Gift of the Holy Ghost is the water of Samaria, the woman at Jacob’s well.

 

The woman at the well cannot see that Christ is the Messiah, just like we cannot understand (see) the field is white already to harvest!  We need light to see and be enlightened.

 

 

"NO PROPHET IS ACCEPTED IN HIS OWN COUNTRY" (Luke 4; John 4)

 

STEPHEN D. RICKS

 

As the congregation in Nazareth turned angrily on Jesus for announcing the fulfillment of the Servant prophecies in Isaiah 61, he responded, "No prophet is accepted in his own country." (Luke 4:16-24.) fn Conversely, Jesus was received as prophet and Messiah by the Samaritans of Sychar, where, at the well of the city, he had plainly told the woman that he was the expected Messiah. (John 4:25-26.) While an underlying theme of both of these accounts is the rejection/acceptance of Jesus as the Son of Man, each presupposes a religious, cultural, and political situation—in Luke 4, synagogues and synagogue worship, and in John 4, the relations between the Jews and the Samaritans, as well as Samaritan beliefs—that were an inherent and self-evident part of the life of first century A.D. Palestine, but are in many respects foreign to us. Only with some understanding about these cultural facts can these passages be fully understood.

 

Synagogue Worship in the Time of Christ

 

Jewish worship in the time of Jesus was centered in the temple and the synagogue. From its beginning, the synagogue served a function different from that of the temple. The temple was primarily a site of priestly sacrifice and the destination of national pilgrimage at the three great pilgrim feasts: Passover, Tabernacles, and Weeks. fn The synagogue, on the other hand, was the place of regular communal worship as well as a significant locus of religious education. fn

 

The origins of the synagogue remain somewhat obscure, although most scholars are agreed that it was already a well-established institution in the early pre-Christian centuries. fn Unlike the temple, which was located at a single site in Palestine at this time, synagogues were found in individual communities throughout the land of Israel.

 

The synagogue at the time of Christ was generally oriented to the east or toward Jerusalem, fn and was rectangular in shape, with a single nave and a raised platform in the front third of the building from which readings from selected texts of the scriptures were given during services. In many ancient synagogues of Palestine, seating was built into the walls adjacent to the speaker's platform; additional seats may also have been set up in the interior of the synagogue in the rear two-thirds of the building. fn Seating was arranged in a particular order, with the younger members of the synagogue seated behind the older and more distinguished members. fn Although it is a matter of dispute, women in the congregation seem to have been separated from the men. fn

 

The order of service was already well developed at the time of Christ. From sources that are nearly contemporary with the New Testament, synagogue services at this period included the following elements: (1) private prayer upon entrance to the synagogue; (2) the recitation of the Shema', a canonical confession of faith in one God; (3) communal prayers; (4) reading from a part of the Torah (the first five books of the Old Testament); (5) reading from the prophets; and (6) following a prayer, a sermon from one of the members of the congregation. fn

 

The Shema', named from the opening words of Deuteronomy 6:4, consists of Deuteronomy 6:4-9 and 11:13-21, and Numbers 15:37-41, preceded and followed by one or two benedictions. These passages were recited as the great confessions of faith among the Jews: "Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God is one Lord: and thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy might. And these words, which I command thee this day, shall be in thine heart: and thou shalt teach them diligently unto thy children, and shalt talk of them when thou sittest in thine house, and when thou walkest by the way, and when thou liest down, and when thou risest up." (Deut. 6:4-7.)

 

Prayers were offered standing fn facing the Holy of Holies in Jerusalem, a practice mentioned several times in the Old Testament; for example, Daniel 6:10, where Daniel "went into his house; and his windows being open in his chamber toward Jerusalem, he kneeled upon his knees three times a day, and prayed, and gave thanks before his God, as he did aforetime." fn The communal prayers were not offered by the whole congregation but by a person designated to do so. The congregation made only certain verbal responses, such as the Amen. fn

 

The synagogue service in New Testament times also included readings from both the Pentateuch (the first five books of the Old Testament) and the prophets. fn Readings from the Pentateuch were based on a lectionary cycle of three or three-and-a-half years, that is, during this period of time all of the chapters of the first five books of the Old Testament were read in the course of the synagogue service. The readings from the prophets at this period may also have been based on such a three- or three-and-a-half-year cycle, but the evidence is less clear on that point. fn

 

A major element of each synagogue service was the sermon given by one of the members of the congregation, who might be chosen by the synagogue leader before the service or might be called from among the congregants. (See Acts 13:15.) Whereas the readings in the scriptures were given standing up, the sermon was given seated. (See Luke 4:20.)

 

"As his custom was," Jesus, like many observant Jews of his day, went to synagogue services on the Sabbath. (Luke 4:16.) We need not suppose that all of the elements of the synagogue service are outlined in Luke 4:16-30, since it was not the intention of the writer to provide a detailed description of the order of service. Jesus read from Isaiah 61:1-2 one of the great messages of hope: "The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor; he hath sent me to heal the broken-hearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised, to preach the acceptable year of the Lord." (Luke 4:18-19.) Whether Jesus himself selected the passage in Isaiah that he read to the congregation or had it selected for him is unclear from the text in Luke, though it seems, based on the later Jewish practice, that the latter is more likely. Thereafter, he was given the opportunity to deliver the sermon to the congregation. The thrust of Jesus' sermon was unmistakable: in him the great message of hope had found its fulfillment. So great was the anger of certain members of the congregation at what they thought was the unwarranted arrogance of "Joseph's son" that they "thrust him out of the city, and led him unto the brow of the hill whereon their city was built, that they might cast him down headlong" (Luke 4:29), but Jesus was able to pass through the crowd, perhaps through miraculous means, and make his way to Capernaum (see also John 7:30; 8:59; 10:39).

 

Jesus and the Samaritan Woman at the Well

 

There was probably no group with which the Jews had lived in longer tension than the Samaritans. Thus, it is not surprising that the Jewish and Samaritan views of Samaritan origins show considerable divergency. According to the Jewish view, the Samaritans were descendants of the intermixture of the few Israelites of the Northern Kingdom who were left at the time of the destruction of that kingdom by the Assyrians and the various peoples whom the Assyrians brought in. (See 2 Kgs. 17:24; Ezra 4:2, 10.) Whereas, according to the Jewish view, the Samaritans claimed nominal allegiance to the Mosaic faith—much of which had been taught to the Samaritans by an errant Jewish priest (the same mentioned in Neh. 13:28)—this Hebrew overlay barely concealed the deep heathen roots of their religion (2 Kgs. 17:24-41). According to the Samaritan version, on the other hand, the Israelite inhabitants of the Northern Kingdom had indeed been deported but never in large numbers. After fifty-five years of exile, even many of them were allowed to return to their homes. fn Thus, according to the Samaritan view, the religion of the Samaritans had always remained predominantly Mosaic, with no heathen substrate. Further, the proximate cause of the breach between the two groups predated the fall of the Northern Kingdom and resulted from the illegitimate transference of the sanctuary from its original location on Mount Gerizim, the "holy mountain" that faced the city of Shechem, to Shiloh in the time of Eli. fn In the light of the actual features of Samaritan belief (which will be discussed below), which betray no more clear indications of influence from contiguous Ancient Near Eastern religions than do the beliefs and practices of Judaism of the same period, it seems likely that the Jewish claims of heathen influence are more the result of the historical tensions between the two groups than from any deeply rooted impulse in Samaritanism that lies outside of the Israelite tradition.

 

The tensions between the Jews and Samaritans were heightened by the Jews' sense that they had been betrayed by the Samaritans during the period of the Babylonian exile and immediately after. According to the account of the exile and return of the Jews in Ezra and Nehemiah, the Samaritans conspired with the foreign overlords of Palestine in order to prevent the Jews from rebuilding the walls of Jerusalem and reconstructing the city. (Ezra 4; Neh. 2:19-20; 4.) The result of these years of rancor and suspicion was a sharp division between members of the two groups that was tantamount to mutual ostracism.

 

The major beliefs in the Samaritan faith included: (1) belief in one God; (2) acknowledgment of Moses as the greatest and final, or "seal" of the prophets; (3) the acceptance of the first five books of the Old Testament as the word of God, and rejection of all else as scripture; (4) belief that Mount Gerizim is the chosen place of God, and acceptance of the temple that stood there as God's chosen sanctuary, with the concomitant rejection of all other sites (such as the temple in Jerusalem); (5) the appearance at the end of time of a Taheb (Ta'eb) or "Restorer," who would appear to usher in a new dispensation, teach the law, and restore the proper modes of worship; and (6) expectation of a final day of rewards for the righteous and punishment for the wicked. fn Of these beliefs, the ones of particular importance for understanding the actions in John 4 are points 3, 4, and 5.

 

As mentioned above, Mount Gerizim was, in the Samaritan view, the true holy mountain of God, not Mount Zion or any other mountain in the land of Israel. The Samaritan text of Deuteronomy 12:5 indicates that God "has chosen" Gerizim as his sacred mountain, not, as in the canonical version, that he "shall choose" it. Further, after each version of the Ten Commandments (Ex. 20:17; Deut. 5:21), the Samaritan text contains a passage commanding sacrifice on that mountain. In Samaritan tradition, the holiness of Mount Gerizim has all of the elements of sacredness that later rabbinic tradition accords to Mount Zion (that is, the Temple Mount): It existed before creation, was the first land to appear out of the watery deep, was the only elevation to escape the effects of the Flood, was the site of the true temple, and will be the only place to survive destruction at the time of the eschatological travails, and it is further identified with numerous places that are mentioned in the Pentateuch. fn

 

Although it was often longer and inconvenient to do so, Jews traveling from Galilee to Jerusalem would often skirt the areas around Shechem (Sychar in the New Testament) in order to avoid the Samaritan population centers. In John 4, however, the initial motivation for going into Samaritan country appears to be a wish to escape as quickly as possible the dangers that Jesus confronted in Judea: "When therefore the Lord knew how the Pharisees had heard that Jesus made and baptized more disciples than John, . . . he left Judaea, and departed again into Galilee. And he must needs go through Samaria." (John 4:1, 3-4.) Implied in this was the "divine hand" working to create a teaching opportunity for Jesus. fn

 

The Samaritan expresses surprise that Jesus would ask for a drink from her, since, John parenthetically explains, "the Jews have no dealings with the Samaritans." (John 4:9; Raymond Brown renders this passage, "Jews, remember, use nothing in common with Samaritans." fn) The reason for this lack of contact between the two people results from the Jewish view that Samaritans were ritually impure: Samaritan women were, according to one passage in the Mishnah, menstruants from the cradle. fn The Jewish attitude toward the Samaritans may also be reflected in a regulation enacted in A.D. 65 that declared all Samaritan women unclean and, consequently, any food or drink likewise ritually impure.

 

When the woman asks Jesus, "Art thou greater than our father Jacob, which gave us the well?" (John 4:12), she is reflecting the deep commitment felt by the Samaritans toward the patriarchal and Exodus figures in Israelite history. Conversely, all of the writings from the period after the entrance of Joshua and Israel into Canaan that were accepted by the Jews as canonical (with their accompanying theology) were viewed by the Samaritans as unauthorized accretions. There is, of course, an unconscious irony in the woman's statement, since she herself will shortly recognize Jesus as the Messiah and one greater than Jacob.

 

After recognizing Jesus as a prophet who had correctly detailed to her her sad and sordid domestic history, the Samaritan woman further says to him: "Our fathers worshiped in this mountain; and ye say, that in Jerusalem is the place where men ought to worship." (John 4:20.) The mountain where her ancestors worshiped was, of course, Gerizim. Her statement implies a prime source of contention between the Samaritans and the Jews: the proper site of worship. Jesus' response does not immediately affirm the correctness of the one location as a site of worship and deny the legitimacy of the other. Rather, his answer serves to affirm that worship is potentially universal: "Woman, believe me, the hour cometh, when ye shall neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem, worship the Father. . . . But the hour cometh, and now is, when true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth." (John 4:21, 23.) There is something importantly prophetic in this as well: just as the temple of the Samaritans had already been destroyed (in ca. 128 B.C.), fn Jesus' statement portends the end of the temple in Jerusalem as well. Christ's utterance should not, however, be construed as a temple-denying statement. Rather, it affirms that the proper site of worship need not be restricted solely to the location of an epiphany.

 

The woman's further statement, "I know that Messias cometh, which is called Christ: when he is come, he will tell us all things" (John 4:25), seems to be an allusion to the Samaritan belief in the Taheb or restorer. The Taheb is not a messiah in the Jewish sense of a deliverer or an anointed prince. Rather, he is like the prophet foretold in Deuteronomy 18:18, where God says: "I will raise them up a Prophet from among their brethren, like unto thee, and will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him." He will appear to usher in a new dispensation, instruct the people in the law, restore the temple on Gerizim, reinstitute the sacrificial cult, and obtain the recognition of the heathen. fn Indeed, much of John 4:19-25 suggests this Samaritan view of the Taheb, one who will teach and restore "all things" to their proper and rightful place.

 

In terms of dramatic sense and literary, artistry, John 4:4-42 is one of the most skillfully crafted pieces in the Gospels. Irony (John 4:12), words spoken and understood at different levels of meaning (John 4:10-11), along with the skillful use of the Samaritan townspeople in the manner of a Greek chorus (John 4:39-42), fn all combine to create a powerful episode in which the Samaritan woman is led, step by step, along a path of recognition of Jesus, first as man, then as Jew, a prophet, and, finally, the Messiah. What began as a simple request for water resulted in the conversion of many Samaritans to Jesus.

 

Conclusion

 

Paradox and foreshadowing characterize both Luke 4 and John 4. Jesus, who had himself asserted that he had been sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel, was rejected by fellow Israelites but accepted by the despised Samaritans as Lord. Conversely, the disciples, whose great commission would be to go into all the world (see Matt. 28:19-20), can scarcely understand, but dare not question, Jesus' speaking to the Samaritan woman. The rejection of Jesus by his own townspeople in Luke 4 may serve as a veiled foreboding of his later rejection, and crucifixion, by the Jews. fn On the other hand, Christ's success among the Samaritans foreshadows the situation of the early church, where the message of Jesus' Messiahship was spread among all the nations. Christ's famous paradox, "the last shall be first, and the first last" (Matt. 20:16), finds vivid illustration in these chapters.

 

NOTES

 

Stephen D. Ricks is associate professor of Hebrew and Semitic languages at Brigham Young University.

 

Footnotes

 

1. The British evangelical biblical scholars I. Howard Marshall and F. F. Bruce see Isaiah 61 as a Servant prophecy. (See I. Howard Marshall, The Gospel of Luke [Exeter: The Paternoster Press, 1978], p. 183. See also headnote to Isaiah 61 of the 1981 LDS edition of the Bible, where these verses are understood as referring to the Messiah.) But as Marshall also points out, Jesus appears in this passage in Luke 4 "as the eschatological prophet—a figure who is to be identified with the Messiah and the Servant of Yahweh." (Ibid., p. 178.)

 

2. The sacrificial cult associated with the temple is treated in greatest detail in the canonical text of the Bible in Leviticus, while the three pilgrim festivals—passover, Weeks, and Tabernacles—are mentioned several times in the Pentateuch (e.g., Ex. 23:14-17; Lev. 23:4-8, 15-21, 33-44). fn

 

. The functional distinction between the worship of the synagogue (communal worship) and the rites of the temple (private devotion and ritual renewal) are paralleled by similar distinctions between the functions of temple and house in numerous other cultures. (See Harold W. Turner, From Temple to Meeting House: The Phenomenology and Theology of Places of Worship (The Hague: Mouton Publishers, 1979.) Certain of the differences between the two types—the temple admitting only those who belong to the community (and, in some instances, only those who are worthy to enter—cf. Moshe Weinfeld, "Instructions for Temple Visitors in the Bible and in Ancient Egypt," Scripta Hierosolymitana 28 [1984]), the synagogue admitting all who are desirous of participating, Jew and Gentile alike—are paralleled by the functional distinction between the chapel and temple among the Mormons; thus Turner (ibid., p. 46) notes that Mormon temples "became distinguished from Mormon chapels and tabernacles by being confined to those deemed ready to receive the mysteries of advanced religion. In no sense is it a Mormon congregational meeting place. It is reserved for special functions which all seem to have some cosmic reference. . . . Mormon temples . . . reveal some of the marks of the temple type and make the term entirely appropriate."

 

4. For a recent discussion (with some bibliography) on the antiquity and origins of the synagogue, see Joseph Gutmann, Ancient Synagogues: The State of the Research (Brown Judaic Studies Series 22) (Chico, Calif.: Scholars Press, 1981), pp. 1-6. Gutmann himself favors an origin in second century B.C. Palestine, but notes the wide variety of scholarly opinion, the current balance weighing in favor of sixth-century B.C. Babylonia. Synagogues are mentioned in the Book of Mormon (2 Ne. 26:26; Alma 21:4; 26:29; 31:12; Hel. 3:9; 3 Ne. 18:32; Moro. 7:1), but this need not be taken as prima facie evidence for the existence of synagogues in the preexilic period, that is, during the time before the departure of Lehi's family from Jerusalem, since the forces that led to the creation of the synagogue were probably already operative during that period of time, even if the synagogue itself was not realized as an institution until a later period.

 

5. Geza Vermes, F. Millar, and Matthew Black, eds., The History of the Jewish People in the Age of Jesus Christ (175 B.C.-A.D. 135), 2 vols. (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1983), 2:442, n. 67.

 

6. Paul Billerbeck, "Ein Synagogengottesdienst in Jesu Tagen," Zeitschrift fur die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 55 (1965): 143-44.

 

7. Philo, Quod Omnis Probus 12; cf. 1 QS 6:8-9.

 

8. The segregation of the sexes is not explicitly mentioned in the ancient literature. Philo's statement concerning the Therapeutae in De Vita Contemplativa 9 is not relevant, according to Vermes et al., eds. (History of the Jewish People 2:448, f. 98). There is no special mention of the separation of the sexes in the Talmud. Still, Vermes et al. assert that "the segregation of the sexes must be taken for granted." Galleries that may have been intended for women (as they are sometimes used in modern orthodox synagogues) have been found in several ancient synagogues in the Galilee. (See E. Goodenough, Jewish Symbols in the Graeco-Roman World, 13 vols. [New York: Pantheon Books, 1953], 1:182, 193.)

 

9. Marshall, The Gospel of Luke, p. 181; Vermes et al., History of the Jewish People 2:447-63. However, as Jacob Neusner has pointed out in numerous articles and books, great caution must be exercised to avoid retrojecting into an earlier period practices that were observed in later eras.

 

10. Matt. 6:5; Mark 11:25; Luke 18:11; Mishnah Berakhot 5:1; Mishnah Ta'anit 2:2.

 

11. Cf. 1 Kgs. 8:48; Ezek. 8:16; Mishnah Berakhot 4:5-6; Tosefta Berakhot 3:16; Jerome, Commentarius in Ezechielem 8:16. Franz Landsberger ("The Sacred Direction in Synagogue and Church," Hebrew Union College Annual 28 [1957]: 181 [=Joseph Gutmann, ed., The Synagogue: Studies in Origins, Archaeology and Architecture (New York: KTAV, 1975), 239]) wishes to avoid the word orientation in speaking of direction of prayer since it "signifies a turning toward the east, while we are concerned not only with the east but also with the west, the north, and the south," i.e., whatever direction it was necessary to turn in order to face toward the Holy of Holies of the temple in Jerusalem. See also Erik Peterson, "Die geschichtlich Bedeutung der judischen Gebetsrichtung," Theologische Zeitschrift 3:1 (1947): 1-15 (=Erik Peterson, Fruhkirche, Judentum un Gnosis [Rome: Herder, 1959], pp. 1-14; E. Peterson, "La croce et la preghiera verso oriente," Ephemerides Liturgicae 58 [1945]: 52-68 (="Das Kreuz und das Gebet nach Osten," in Peterson, Fruhkirche, pp. 15-35).

 

12. Vermes et al., History of the Jewish People 2:449-50.

 

13. Besides the evidence for liturgical readings from the prophets in Luke 4:17, there is a similar account in Acts 13:14-15: "When they departed from Perga, they came to Antioch in Pisidia, and went into the synagogue on the sabbath day, and sat down. And after the reading of the law and the prophets the rulers of the synagogue sent unto them, saying, Ye men and brethren, if ye have any word of exhortation for the people, say on." Compare Mishnah Megillah 4:1-5.

 

14. Marshall, Luke, p. 181; L. C. Crockett, "Luke iv. 16-30 and the Jewish Lectionary Cycle: A Word of Caution," Journal of Jewish Studies 17 (1966): 13-46; J. Heinemann, "The Triennial Lectionary Cycle," Journal of Jewish Studies 19 (1968): 41-48; Charles Perrot, "Luc 4, 16-30 et la lecture biblique de l'ancienne synagogue," Revue des Sciences Religieuses 47 (1973): 324-40 (=Jacques-E. Menard, ed., Exegese biblique et judaisme [Strasbourg: Faculte de theologie catholique]), 170-83.

 

15. For a convenient summary of Samaritan history during the ancient and early medieval periods, from both the Jewish and Samaritan points of view, see J. Macdonald, "Samaritans," in Encyclopedia Judaica, 16 vols. (Jerusalem: Keter Publishing, 1975), 14:727-31; Theodor H. Gaster, "Samaritans," in G. A. Buttrick, ed., The Interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible, 4 vols. (Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1962), 4:191-92.

 

16. Shechem is mentioned numerous times in the Pentateuch; for example, Gen. 12:6; 33:18; 35:4; 37:14. Shechem was the site of the covenant renewal ceremony mentioned in Joshua 24 and was the place where the bones of Joseph were interred. (Josh. 24:32.) Mount Gerizim is also mentioned in the Pentateuch, as in Deuteronomy 11:29, where the blessing is "put" on Gerizim, the curse on Ebal, a mountain due north of Gerizim and also facing Shechem. In Deuteronomy 27:11-13,Moses commanded representatives of certain of the tribes to stand on Gerizim to bless the people, while representatives of other tribes would stand on Ebal to curse the people in the event that they failed to observe God's laws.

 

17. Gaster, "Samaritans," pp. 193-94.

 

18. Gaster, "Samaritans," p. 194; Jonathan Z. Smith, "Earth and Gods," in Map Is Not Territory (Leiden: Brill, 1978), pp. 112-15. Similar beliefs developed in Christian tradition surrounding the sanctity of Golgotha; see J. Jeremias, "Golgotha und der heilige Felsen," Angelos: Archiv fur neutestamentliche Zeitgeschichte und Kulturkunde 2 (1926). There are similar accounts in Muslim tradition outlining the primeval and eschatological significance of the Ka'ba in Mecca.

 

19. Ernst Haenchen, John I, Robert W. Funk, trans. (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1984), p. 218; Raymond E. Brown, The Gospel According to John I-XII (Garden City, New York: Doubleday & Co., 1981), p. 169.

 

20. Ibid., p. 170.

 

21. See David Daube, "Jesus and the Samaritan Woman: The Meaning of sunchraomai," Journal of Biblical Literature 69 (1950): 137-47. Daube himself translates this passage, "The Jews do not use vessels together with Samaritans," ibid., p. 139.

 

22. According to Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews 13.9.1, the Jewish ruler John Hyrcanus had destroyed the Samaritan temple in 128 B.C.

 

23. John Bowman, "Early Samaritan Eschatology," Journal of Jewish Studies 5 (1955): 163-72; John Bowman, "Samaritan Studies," Bulletin of the John Rylands Library 40 (1957-58): 299.

 

24. Brown, John, p. 176.

 

25. Joseph Fitzmeyer, The Gospel According to Luke I-IX (Garden City, New York: Doubleday & Co., 1981), p. 529.

 

 

(Kent P. Jackson and Robert L. Millet, eds., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 5: The Gospels [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1986], 201.)

 

 

(John 4:16-35.) – Christ is a prophet as well as the Son of God; she couldn’t see this fact, he knew her life in detail and of course knew her marital status.  Yet he loves her and wishes to save her. 

 

16 Jesus saith unto her, Go, call thy husband, and come hither.

 

17 The woman answered and said, I have no husband. Jesus said unto her, Thou hast well said, I have no husband:

 

18 For thou hast had five husbands; and he whom thou now hast is not thy husband: in that saidst thou truly.

 

19 The woman saith unto him, Sir, I perceive that thou art a prophet.

 

20 Our fathers worshipped in this mountain; and ye say, that in Jerusalem is the place where men ought to worship.

 

21 Jesus saith unto her, Woman, believe me, the hour cometh, when ye shall neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem, worship the Father.

 

22 Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews.

 

23 But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him.

 

24 God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.

 

25 The woman saith unto him, I know that Messias cometh, which is called Christ: when he is come, he will tell us all things.

 

26 Jesus saith unto her, I that speak unto thee am he.

 

27 ¶ And upon this came his disciples, and marvelled that he talked with the woman: yet no man said, What seekest thou? or, Why talkest thou with her?

 

28 The woman then left her waterpot, and went her way into the city, and saith to the men,

 

29 Come, see a man, which told me all things that ever I did: is not this the Christ?

 

30 Then they went out of the city, and came unto him.

 

31 ¶ In the mean while his disciples prayed him, saying, Master, eat.

 

32 But he said unto them, I have meat to eat that ye know not of.

 

33 Therefore said the disciples one to another, Hath any man brought him ought to eat?

 

34 Jesus saith unto them, My meat is to do the will of him that sent me, and to finish his work.

 

35 Say not ye, There are yet four months, and then cometh harvest? behold, I say unto you, Lift up your eyes, and look on the fields; for they are white already to harvest.

 

 

Jesus Takes the Gospel to Samaria

 

Unto him that keepeth my commandments I will give the mysteries of my kingdom, and the same shall be in him a well of living water, springing up unto everlasting life. (D&C 63:23.)

 

Jesus Journeys to Sychar in Samaria

 

(John 4:4-6; JST John 4:2, John 4:76-7)

 

"I must needs go through Samaria," Jesus said to his disciples, as he and they prepared to leave Judea and go to Galilee. Having embittered the Pharisees with his bold doctrines to the point that "they sought more diligently some means that they might put him to death," and knowing that his mission in Judea, for the moment, was completed, Jesus chose to go back to Galilee, to the land of his youth, to the rugged and hilly homeland where friends and kinsmen dwelt, there to launch his great Galilean ministry.

 

But why take the dangerous and robber-infested route through Samaria? It was the Jewish practice to go the long way around, through Perea, for the Samaritans were a hated race whose customs were abhorred and whose traditions were shunned. True, "the direct road to Galilee ran through the half-heathen country of Samaria," but this "road was proverbially unsafe for Jewish passengers, either returning from Jerusalem or going to it, for it passed through the border districts where the feuds of the two rival peoples raged most fiercely. The paths among the hills of Akrabbim, leading into Samaria, had often been wet with the blood of Jew or Samaritan, for they were the scene of constant raids and forays. . . . The pilgrims from Galilee to the feasts were often molested, and sometimes even attacked and scattered, with more or less slaughter; each act of violence bringing speedy reprisals from the population of Jerusalem and Judea, on the one side, and of Galilee on the other; the villages of the border districts, as most easily reached, bearing the brunt of the feud, in smoking cottages, and indiscriminate massacre of young and old." (Geikie, p. 361.)

 

Why, then, did Jesus feel compelled to go through Samaria? Superficially, some have supposed it was to avoid Perea, that part of Palestinian soil which was subject to Herod Antipas, who had now imprisoned John, and who—thanks to pharisaic intrigue—apparently opposed Jesus for himself and because he was the friend and colleague of the Baptist. Perhaps with Herod's soldiers on the alert to arrest for treason any who gathered followers—whether religious or political—there were perils connected with Perean travel, and they may have been, in Jesus' case, more serious than those through Samaria. We must conclude, however, that Jesus, though merely en route to Galilee for a greater work, chose to utilize his time and to bear witness of his divinity to the Samaritans. That is, Jesus went to Samaria to preach the gospel, to tell that spiritually benighted race that he was the Messiah whom they sought, and that salvation is in him. His message is the same for all people, Jew and Gentile alike, and the Samaritans were a racial mixture, half-Israelite and half-Gentile. fn They must hear his voice; the Everlasting Word must speak to them in person.

 

As to the religion of the Samaritans, it was "a spurious Judaism," Edersheim says, "consisting of a mixture of their former [pagan] superstitions with Jewish doctrines and rites." They had once built their own temple on Mount Gerizim, and they claimed their own high priest and their own priestly administrators. "In the troublous times of Antiochus IV Epiphanes, the Samaritans escaped the fate of the Jews by repudiating all connection with Israel, and dedicating their temple to Jupiter. . . . In 130 B.C. John Hyrcanus destroyed the Temple on Mount Gerizim, which was never rebuilt." (Edersheim 1:396-98.) fn

 

The Samaritans were a half-Jewish, half-heathen race who practiced a form of worship of Jehovah and who looked for a Messiah who was to come. Their religious sensitivities were not so highly refined as were those of the Jews, but they were nonetheless children of the Father of us all, and his Son chose to preach the gospel of salvation to them beginning in Sychar.

 

And so our Lord and his missionary companions go from Judea to Samaria—from northern Judea, where he and they were teaching and baptizing, to Jacob's Well near Sychar, a distance of some twenty miles. Their travels are through a rugged, hilly area; even in December the Palestinian weather is hot. Jesus is thirsty, hungry, weary. fn He rests in the shade of the alcove that protects the well while his disciples go another half mile or so into the city to obtain food.

 

Jesus Offers Living Water to All Men

 

(John 4:7-15; JST John 4:11, 15-16)

 

Jesus is alone on ground hallowed by the feet of the great patriarch Jacob, who is Israel and whose descendants are the chosen people, of whom Jesus is one. Here is the parcel of ground that Jacob gave to his son Joseph; here is the well—seven or eight feet in diameter and one hundred fifty feet deep—that the father of all Israel dug to provide lifegiving draughts to his family and cattle. On either side are Ebal and Gerizim, mountains of ancient fame, and nearby is the tomb of Joseph, whose bones were carried out of Egypt. What ponderings as to the past, and what meditations of the present and the future, our Lord now has on this sacred spot, we can only surmise.

 

His moment of solitude soon ends. A woman of Samaria—alone and unattended, carrying a pitcher on her head, with a long cord to lower and raise the vessel—comes to draw water from her ancestor's well. Jesus speaks. "Give me to drink," he says. And, be it noted, to have the very conversation that he is now commencing is one of the chief reasons he chose to travel through Samaria, as he made his way to his homeland of Galilee.

 

"How is it that thou, being a Jew, askest drink of me, which am a woman of Samaria?" the woman responds, "for the Jews have no dealings with the Samaritans." To give drink to a thirsty traveler was, in that day and in that part of the earth, a cardinal rule of proper human conduct. To drink water is to live; to thirst for its life-giving properties is to die. All people in Palestine, Jew and Samaritan alike, gave water to their neighbors as the need arose. But the woman here is so taken back by the request of a Jew that she hesitates to comply with a basic rule of their society.

 

Time was when the Jews cursed the Samaritans in their synagogues, refused to accept them as proselytes, accused them of worshipping idols, said that to eat their bread was like eating swine's flesh, and taught that they would be denied a resurrection. Even Jesus spoke of a Samaritan as a stranger, or more accurately an alien. These feelings were not now so intense, as witness the fact that the disciples were then in Sychar to obtain Samaritan food, but much of the old hatreds remained. Why then was this Jew asking a Samaritan for a drink?

 

"If thou knewest the gift of God"—the gift of his Son ("For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life"—John 3:16) fn—"and who it is that saith to thee, Give me to drink; thou wouldest have asked of him, and he would have given thee living water."

 

Living water! "For the thirsty and choking traveler in a desert wilderness to find water, is to find life, to find an escape from agonizing death; similarly, the weary pilgrim traveling through the wilderness of mortality saves himself eternally by drinking from the wells of living water found in the gospel.

 

"Living water is the words of eternal life, the message of salvation, the truths about God and his kingdom; it is the doctrines of the gospel. Those who thirst are invited to come unto Christ and drink. Where there are prophets of God, there will be found rivers of living water, wells filled with eternal truths, springs bubbling forth their life-giving draughts that save from spiritual death." (Commentary 1:151-52.)

 

For the sin-laden woman of Samaria, Jesus' words have little meaning. Her spiritual understanding is dimmed almost to darkness because she has chosen adultery as a way of life. "The things of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God. . . . The natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned." (1 Cor. 2:11-14.) Her response can deal only with literal water; the things of the Spirit are beyond her comprehension.

 

"Sir, thou hast nothing to draw with," she says, "and the well is deep: from whence then hast thou that living water?" As though living water could be found in a dead well! As though spiritual things can be understood by a carnal mind! "Art thou greater than our father Jacob, which gave us the well, and drank thereof himself, and his children, and his cattle?" Her claim to prophetic ancestry but dramatizes the reality that even the wicked and ungodly have religious instincts that they seek to satisfy by forms of worship that do not interfere with their carnal courses.

 

The stage is set, all is in readiness, and the Master Teacher is now prepared to teach the perfect lesson, to deliver the message of how salvation comes to thirsty and water-hungry mortals. They must drink the draughts of eternal truth; these only will give life to the spirit; these eternal wells, full of eternal water, will make available eternal life. As the parched and swollen tongues of desert travelers are refreshed with water drawn from the wells of earth, so the thirsting spirit lives again when living water is poured into the soul. Hence, Jesus' answer is:

 

Whosoever shall drink of this well, shall thirst again; But whosoever drinketh of the water which I shall give him shall never thirst; but the water that I shall give him shall be in him a well of water springing up into everlasting life.

 

But the woman, still blinded by her sins, fails to hear the message. Still thinking only of the things of this world, as is the way with carnal people, she says: "Sir, give me this water, that I thirst not, neither come hither to draw."

 

Jesus Invites Men to Worship the Father

 

(John 4:16-24; JST John 4:26)

 

Jesus taught the woman of Samaria that she must come to him and receive the living water that refreshes and enlivens the spirit and leads the spiritually refreshed person to eternal life. His teachings were beyond the level of her spiritual understanding. She remained in darkness. He now uses her to find other truth seekers for him, and he does it by shocking her with a demonstration of his divine power, so that, perchance, even yet she will come to an understanding of the message he is sent to deliver. "Go, call thy husband, and come hither," he directs. "I have no husband," she replies. Jesus says, "Thou hast well said, I have no husband: For thou hast had five husbands; and he whom thou now hast is not thy husband: in that saidst thou truly."

 

A light begins to dawn. This is no ordinary man; not only does he speak of a strange water, living water, but he also reveals those things which can only be known by divine power. "Sir, I perceive that thou art a prophet," the woman says.

 

This, then, is her opportunity. This Jew is a prophet; he can solve the centuries-old dispute between the Samaritans and the Jews. True Israelite worship centers in a temple. Jerusalem has its House of Herod with its great altar and its Holy of Holies; the Samaritan temple on Mount Gerizim was destroyed more than one hundred fifty years ago. Now, here at the foot of that Samaritan place of worship, the woman ventures to say: "Our fathers worshipped in this mountain; and ye say, that in Jerusalem is the place where men ought to worship."

 

"Woman, believe me," comes the response, "the hour cometh, when ye shall neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem, worship the Father," which is to say: The places where men built the temples of the past shall no longer be the only centers of approved worship. The old order changeth; there ariseth a new covenant, a new gospel: the temples of the future are the bodies of the saints; fn and the sacrifices of the future are a broken heart and a contrite spirit. fn The true believers of the future shall worship in all places and at all times, not just when sacrificial fires burn on Gerizim and in Jerusalem.

 

"Ye worship ye know not what." Samaritan worship was a strange intermixture of pagan and Israelite doctrine. Centuries before they had added the worship of Jehovah to the worship of their numerous idols; now this higher form of worship had become the dominant force in their way of worship, and their rituals and performances were dominantly Mosaic in nature, but still their worship was both Jewish and pagan all wrapped in one. fn

 

"We know what we worship," Jesus continued, "for salvation is of the Jews." As between Jerusalem and Mount Gerizim; as between the Jews and the Samaritans; as between a people who accepted all of the Old Testament, and another that believed only the Pentateuch; as was the case with the Samaritans—the Jews were right and the Samaritans were wrong. The Jews knew what they worshipped, and such knowledge was not had by the Samaritans. Jesus had no hesitancy in telling would-be worshippers that their system of religion was wrong. Though the Jews were apostate, as a people, yet they did have the scriptures; they did search the writings of the prophets; their priests were still legal administrators; they had the knowledge of God to a degree; and salvation was to come through them to the world. Their Messiah was to be the Savior of the world. And so Jesus, the foundation again having been laid, makes the great proclamation:

 

But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him. For unto such hath God promised his Spirit [not God is a Spirit as our King James Version erroneously records]—And they who worship him, must worship in spirit and in truth.

 

Jesus Saith: I AM THE MESSIAH

 

(John 4:25-30; JST John 4:28)

 

We know that there is a God in heaven, who is infinite and eternal, from everlasting to everlasting the same unchangeable God, the framer of heaven and earth, and all things which are in them; And that he created man, male and female, after his own image and in his own likeness, created he them; And gave unto them commandments that they should love and serve him, the only living and true God, and that he should be the only being whom they should worship. (D&C 20:17-19.)

 

Praise ye the Father. Worship the Father. Come unto the Father. He is God above all. Worship him in spirit and in truth. Such is his will. But do it in and through Christ who is the Messiah.

 

The number one truth—in all eternity—is that God is our Father, the Creator of us and all things, whom we must worship in spirit and in truth to gain salvation. Jesus has now, at Jacob's Well, proclaimed this eternal verity. It is the beginning of all true religion.

 

The number two truth—in all eternity—is that the Son of God is the Messiah, the Redeemer, through whose atoning sacrifice immortality and eternal life are brought to pass. Having testified of the Father, our Lord must now bear witness of the Son. The woman, still not comprehending the pearls of great price that are dropping from the mouth of a Jew, says: "I know that Messias cometh, which is called Christ: when he is come, he will tell us all things." fn She could not believe this unknown Jew; if only the Messiah would come, if only he were here, all problems would be solved!

 

Jesus said unto her, I who speak unto thee am the Messias.

 

She had his witness of the Father; now he bore record of himself. He knew who he was. In the temple when but twelve years of age, he had so certified, in the statements about his Father's business. He had accepted the testimonies of John the Baptist and of his disciples. Nicodemus had heard him refer to himself as the Only Begotten of the Father. He was the Messiah; he knew it; and he knew it was his mission so to testify to all who would hear, whether they were receptive or, as this Samaritan woman, had sealed hearts and unbelieving blood.

 

How much else Jesus said to this woman we do not know. At this point in the dialogue, John's account says the disciples returned from Sychar with food to eat. They marveled that Jesus talked with the woman—a conversation that he and not she had initiated, for it violated the customs of the day for a Rabbi to speak in public with a woman, to say nothing of a Samaritan woman, and least of all a woman of easy virtue. Yet their reserve was such and his command of the situation so complete that none asked, "What seekest thou: or, Why talkest thou with her?"

 

With the arrival of the disciples, the woman left, leaving, in her excitement, her water pot. In the city she said to the men, "Come, see a man, which told me all things that ever I did." No doubt her report was a great exaggeration, but Jesus may well have told her other things about her life than those which pertained to her marital state. She had heard him say he was the Messiah, and so she said to the people in the city: "Is not this the Christ?"

 

"Then they went out of the city," as Jesus had planned and foreseen, "and came unto him." He had preached to one unreceptive person with such power and effect that he now had a congregation of many receptive souls, all anxious to hear the marvelous message about which one of their own number spoke so positively.

 

"He That Reapeth Receiveth Wages"

 

(John 4:31-42; JST John 4:40)

 

After the woman, whose name we do not even know, departed for Sychar, the disciples made ready their food. When it was offered to Jesus, he said: "I have meat to eat that ye know not of," which caused the disciples to ask one another: "Hath any man brought him ought to eat?"

 

To this Jesus said: "My meat is to do the will of him that sent me, and to finish his work." The preaching of the gospel; the spread of eternal truth; the establishment of the earthly kingdom; the onward rolling of the great cause of truth and righteousness among men—these become the work, the all-consuming passion, of those who are endowed with power from on high. It becomes their meat and their drink; it takes all their strength; it embraces every waking word and thought. Those who are called to divine service are expected to serve with all their hearts, might, mind, and strength. Temporal needs sink into oblivion. The work becomes their meat and drink and breath and life. Jesus' meat was to do the work of his Father.

 

Now the multitudes are arriving. "Say not ye, There are yet four months, and then cometh harvest?" Jesus asks. That is, it is late December, possibly early January, and in four months the barley harvest will begin in Palestine. But as Jesus had spoken of living water and spiritual meat, he is now speaking of a harvest, not of barley, but of human souls. "Lift up your eyes, and look on the fields; for they are white already to harvest." Surely this was a sample of what the prophet Joel had foreseen: "Put ye in the sickle, for the harvest is ripe," he said, as he spoke of the "multitudes in the valley of decision" (Joel 3:12-14), the hosts of men who must decide whether they will be gathered with the Lord's harvest into his kingdom or be left for the day when the tares and the grain that are not harvested shall be burned.

 

"And he that reapeth receiveth wages, and gathereth fruit unto life eternal," Jesus continued, "that both he that soweth and he that reapeth may rejoice together." The Lord pays his servants. Those who sow and those who harvest in his fields receive wages. They receive eternal life for themselves in that kingdom which is eternal; such a reward is the wages that are provided. fn

 

"And herein is that saying true, One soweth, and another reapeth. I have sent you to reap that whereon ye bestowed no labor; the prophets have labored, and ye have entered into their labors." The work of saving souls is a great cooperative enterprise: one sows and another reaps. Isaiah and the prophets foretold the coming of a Messiah and the setting up of his earthly kingdom; they sowed the seeds of faith in the hearts of all who should read and believe their words, and the disciples who were with Jesus in his ministry reaped in the fields planted by their fellow servants of old. The Nephite prophets sowed the seeds of faith and righteousness in the Book of Mormon, and we go out, in our day, to reap the harvest, so that we and our Nephite brethren can rejoice together in that great day when all are safely gathered into the Eternal Granaries.

 

Jesus preached to those who thus came out to hear him, and he went, at their importuning, into the city, where he abode two days ministering among the people. Many believed because of the testimony of the woman. "And many more believed because of his own word," and they testified: "We have heard him ourselves, and know that this is indeed the Christ, the Saviour of the world."

 

Truly, the gospel was preached in Samaria. Seeds were sown and a harvest reaped. And at a later date, apostles and seventies and other missionaries would yet reap in the same fields. Jesus' stay there lasted only a few days, but the results of his ministry shall endure to all generations. And we cannot but hope that the woman who first met him at the well of the ancient patriarch was among those who forsook the world, had their sins washed away in the waters of baptism, kept the commandments thereafter, and received an eternal inheritance with the saved and exalted of all ages.

 

Footnotes

 

1. "When the Ten Tribes were transported to Assyria more than seven centuries before the Christian era, Samaria was repeopled by heathen colonists from other Assyrian provinces. These pagan peoples, intermixing somewhat with scattered remnants of Israel, founded the race of despised and hated Samaritans of Jesus' day. As a nation, they claimed Jacob as their father and maintained they were inheritors of the blessings of the chosen seed. Their religion, partially pagan in nature, accepted the Pentateuch, but rejected the prophets and the psalms. In the day of Jesus they were friendly to Herod and Rome, but bitter toward the Jews, a feeling fully reciprocated by their Jewish kindred." (Commentary 1:151.)

 

2. "The political enmity and religious separation between the Jews and Samaritans account for their mutual jealousy. On all public occasions the Samaritans took the part hostile to the Jews, while they seized every opportunity of injuring and insulting them. Thus, in the time of Antiochus III they sold many Jews into slavery. Afterwards they sought to mislead the Jews at a distance, to whom the beginning of every month (so important to the Jewish festive arrangements) was intimated by beacon fires, by kindling spurious signals. We also read that they tried to desecrate the Temple on the eve of the Passover; and that they waylaid and killed pilgrims on their road to Jerusalem. The Jews retaliated by treating the Samaritans with every mark of contempt; by accusing them of falsehood, folly, and irreligion; and, what they felt most keenly, by disowning them as of the same race or religion, and this in the most offensive terms of assumed superiority and self-righteous fanaticism. " (Edersheim 1:399.)

 

3. "Here we view one of the most human scenes of the Master's whole ministry. The Lord of heaven, who created and controls all things, having made clay his tabernacle, is physically tired, weary, hungry, and thirsty, following his long journey from Judea. He who had power to draw food and drink from the elements, who could have transported himself at will to any location, sought rest and refreshments at Jacob's Well. In all things he was subjecting himself to the proper experiences of mortality." (Commentary 1:151.)

 

4. Farrar, p. 159, footnote 2; Edersheim 1:399-403; Luke 17:18.

 

5. "Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you?" (1 Cor. 3:16.)

 

6. "And ye shall offer up unto me no more the shedding of blood; yea, your sacrifices and your burnt offerings shall be done away, for I will accept none of your sacrifices and your burnt offerings. And ye shall offer for a sacrifice unto me a broken heart and a contrite spirit." (3 Ne. 9:19-20.) "Present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service." (Rom. 12:1.)

 

7. We might liken Samaritan worship to that of the Aztecs or the Mayas, after those ancient peoples had been conquered by Cortez and the other Spanish generals. Their conquerors imposed Christianity in the form of Catholicism upon them, and the result was a strange admixture of religious form and thought, which over the years has taken on more and more of the basics of Catholicism and less and less of the paganism of the past.

 

8. With the Samaritans it was as with the Jews, they anxiously awaited the advent of the Messiah. "They looked for the coming of a Messiah, in Whom the promise would be fulfilled, that the Lord God would raise up a Prophet from the midst of them, like unto Moses, in Whom his words were to be, and unto Whom they should hearken. Thus, while, in some respects, access to them would be more difficult than to His own countrymen, yet in others Jesus would find there a soil better prepared for the Divine Seed, or, at least, less encumbered by the thistles and tares of traditionalism and Pharisaic bigotry." (Edersheim 1:403.)

 

9. "For behold the field is white already to harvest; and lo, he that thrusteth in his sickle with his might, the same layeth up in store that he perisheth not, but bringeth salvation to his soul." (D&C 4:4.) "Whoso desireth to reap, let him thrust in his sickle with his might, and reap while the day lasts. that he may treasure up for his soul everlasting salvation in the kingdom of God." (D&C 6:3.)

 

 

 

 

(Bruce R. McConkie, The Mortal Messiah: From Bethlehem to Calvary, 4 vols. [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1979-1981], 1: 493.)

 

 

 

(John 4:46-54.) – The father’s faith is rewarded because of his faith; the son was healed at 1:00 pm, the same time as the request was made.  The man had faith in what he could not see, absolute confidence combined with action.

 

46 So Jesus came again into Cana of Galilee, where he made the water wine. And there was a certain nobleman, whose son was sick at Capernaum.

 

47 When he heard that Jesus was come out of Judaea into Galilee, he went unto him, and besought him that he would come down, and heal his son: for he was at the point of death.

 

48 Then said Jesus unto him, Except ye see signs and wonders, ye will not believe.

 

49 The nobleman saith unto him, Sir, come down ere my child die.

 

50 Jesus saith unto him, Go thy way; thy son liveth. And the man believed the word that Jesus had spoken unto him, and he went his way.

 

51 And as he was now going down, his servants met him, and told him, saying, Thy son liveth.

 

52 Then enquired he of them the hour when he began to amend. And they said unto him, Yesterday at the seventh hour the fever left him.

 

53 So the father knew that it was at the same hour, in the which Jesus said unto him, Thy son liveth: and himself believed, and his whole house.

 

54 This is again the second miracle that Jesus did, when he was come out of Judaea into Galilee.

 

 

Jesus Heals the Nobleman's Son

 

(John 4:46-54; JST John 4:55-56)

 

Miracles are part of the gospel. Signs follow those that believe. Where the doctrines of salvation are taught in purity and perfection, where there are believing souls who accept these truths and make them a part of their lives, and where devout souls accept Jesus as their Lord and serve him to the best of their ability, there will always be miracles. Such ever attend the preaching of the gospel to receptive and conforming people. Miracles stand as a sign and a witness of the truth and divinity of the Lord's work. Where there are miracles, there is the gospel, the Church, the kingdom, and the hope of salvation. Where there are no signs and miracles, none of these desired blessings will be found. These realizations prepare us to consider the episodes and reports that have been preserved for us in the Gospels.

 

And so Jesus, coming back into Galilee, to a people many of whom are for the moment receptive and friendly, goes to Cana. His fame has preceded him; indeed, part of his fame had its beginning in this very Galilean village, for it was here that water became wine at his word. But now the Galileans also have in mind what he had done at the Feast of the Passover; and we cannot discount the possibility—shall we not say probability—that the glad tidings of his doings, of nine months' duration, through all Judea, have also come to their attention. He is being hailed by many for what he says he is, the One sent to teach and heal.

 

While Jesus was in Cana, perhaps staying at the home of Nathanael, there came to him from Capernaum, some twenty miles away, a nobleman whose son "was at the point of death." That this nobleman was an officer, either civil or military, in the court of Herod Antipas is reasonably certain; at least the word used by John to describe him is the same one Josephus and others used repetitiously to refer to officers in the service of that evil tyrant. In any event, the nobleman besought Jesus "that he would come down, and heal his son." What words of earnest entreaty were used we do not know. Their import must have been to induce the Master to travel to the bedside of the dying son, a thing that Jesus had no intention of doing.

 

To this assumption that the personal presence of the Healer was required to effect a cure, Jesus said: "Except ye see signs and wonders, ye will not believe." 'Except ye see me come and lay my hands on the head of your son, as ye are aware I have done to others, ye will not believe that he shall be healed. Do ye not know that it is written of me, "He sent his word, and healed them"?' (Ps. 107:20.) In spite of this gentle rebuke, the nobleman continued to plead: "Sir, come down ere my child die."

 

Having thus tested the growing faith of the influential suppliant, and finding that he knew in his heart that Jesus had power to heal those who lay at death's door, our Lord said: "Go thy way; thy son liveth." There was to be no gradual cure; distance meant nothing where the exercise of healing power was involved. Jesus spoke, and the event transpired. Without further assurance, knowing only that this Man's words must all be fulfilled, the nobleman "believed the word that Jesus had spoken unto him, and he went his way."

 

Whereas he had come in haste, anxious and perturbed, importuning and pleading that Jesus travel to Capernaum and heal his son, now, at peace within himself, he remained overnight in or near Cana. The next day as he traveled homeward he met his servants, who said, "Thy son liveth," and he learned that the fever had left him at the very hour when Jesus had spoken those same blessed words.

 

This is the first healing miracle that is set forth in detail in the Gospels. Those performed at the Feast of the Passover and throughout all Judea are not described or explained. This miracle—the second performed in Cana—adds a new dimension to Jesus' healing ministry that we have not seen up to this point. It is in fact a dual miracle: one that healed the body of the absent son, and one that cured unbelief and planted faith in the heart of the present father.

 

With reference to the dying boy, it bears witness that the Divine Healer is not limited by geographical location; that he speaks and disease flees; that the whereabouts of the suffering suppliant is of no moment; that God governs all things; that his power is everywhere. With reference to the father who sought the divine intervention, it bears witness that the growth of faith in the heart of an earthbound pilgrim, and the healing, as it were, of the soul of man, is as great a miracle as—nay, a far greater miracle than—the healing of the physical body.

 

Having heard the gospel taught, and believing that the Teacher could work miracles, the father came to Jesus. 'Come down to Capernaum and heal my son,' he pleaded. By declining to go down—as though his personal presence was required for a miracle!—Jesus tested the faith of the father; and finding that it remained unshaken, he healed the child at a word. The father, without more and before word came from his servants, knew that the healing power had operated and that his son lived. When this was confirmed a day later, John says: "Himself believed, and his whole house." We have seen, thus, the miracle of healing a disease-ridden body and the healing of a truth-seeking soul; we have seen a physical cure that raised a boy from the doors of death, and a spiritual cure that enabled a man to shake off the disease of unbelief that leads to spiritual death. Truly the Master Healer uses his power in a perfect way for the blessing and benefit of his mortal brethren!

 

 

(Bruce R. McConkie, The Mortal Messiah: From Bethlehem to Calvary, 4 vols. [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1979-1981], 2: 10.)

 

 

 

 

John 5-9

April 12, 2007

 

 

3 Nephi 9-25 – We receive the lesser portion of the word to try our faith

3 Nephi 26 – Only 100th part can Mormon write of all of the events the Savior did with the people.

 

The greater portion of the plates are sealed, Lehi’s dream 1st Nephi 8, greater detail in Nephi’s dream chapters 11-14.

 

(JST John 5:1-20.) – The Jewish leaders were satisfied with the dos and don’ts and were angry with Jesus healing on the Sabbath, He kept the Sabbath perfectly.  They cared less about the miracle; they focused on the supposed violation of the law.  Christ does the will of the Father, if you want to come to the Father you must follow Christ.

 

1 After this there was a feast of the Jews; and Jesus went up to Jerusalem.

 

2 Now there is at Jerusalem, by the sheep market, a pool which is called in the Hebrew tongue, Bethesda, having five porches.

 

3 In these porches lay a great many impotent folk, of blind, halt, withered, waiting for the moving of the water.

 

4 For an angel went down at a certain season into the pool, and troubled the water, whosoever then first after the troubling of the water stepped in, was made whole of whatsoever disease he had.

 

5 And a certain man was there, who had an infirmity thirty and eight years.

 

6 And Jesus saw him lie, and knew that he had been now a long time afflicted; and he said unto him, Wilt thou be made whole?

 

7 The impotent man answered him, Sir, I have no man when the water is troubled, to put me into the pool; but while I am coming, another steppeth down before me.

 

8 Jesus said unto him, Rise, take up thy bed and walk.

 

9 And immediately the man was made whole, and took up his bed, and walked; and it was on the Sabbath day.

 

10 The Jews therefore said unto him who was cured, It is the Sabbath day; it is not lawful for thee to carry thy bed.

 

11 He answered them, He who made me whole, said unto me, Take up thy bed and walk.

 

12 Then answered they him, saying, What man is he who said unto thee, Take up thy bed and walk?

 

13 And he that was healed knew not who it was; for Jesus had conveyed himself away, a multitude being in the place.

 

14 Afterward Jesus findeth him in the temple, and said unto him, Behold, thou art made whole; sin no more, lest a worse thing come unto thee.

 

15 The man departed, and told the Jews that it was Jesus who had made him whole;

 

16 And therefore did the Jews persecute Jesus, and sought to slay him, because he had done these things on the Sabbath day.

 

17 But Jesus answered them, My Father worketh hitherto, and I work.

 

18 Therefore the Jews sought the more to kill him, because he had not only broken the Sabbath, but said also that God was his father, making himself equal with God.

 

19 Then answered Jesus and said unto them, Verily, Verily, I say unto you, The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do; for what things soever he doeth, these also doeth the Son likewise.

 

20 For the Father loveth the Son, and showeth him all things that himself doeth; and he will show him greater works than these, that ye may marvel.

 

 

 

The Grandeur of God

Elder Jeffery R. Holland
Of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles
Ensign, Nov. 2003, pp. ??

[Note: Original footnotes have been placed within the text.]

Of the many magnificent purposes served in the life and ministry of the Lord Jesus Christ, one great aspect of that mission often goes uncelebrated. His followers did not understand it fully at the time, and many in modern Christianity do not grasp it now, but the Savior Himself spoke of it repeatedly and emphatically. It is the grand truth that in all that Jesus came to say and do, including and especially in His atoning suffering and sacrifice, He was showing us who and what God our Eternal Father is like, how completely devoted He is to His children in every age and nation. In word and in deed Jesus was trying to reveal and make personal to us the true nature of His Father, our Father in Heaven.

He did this at least in part because then and now all of us need to know God more fully in order to love Him more deeply and obey Him more completely. As both Old and New Testaments declare, "The first of all the commandments is . . . thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength: this is the first [and great] commandment" (Mark 12:29-30; see also Matthew 22:37-38; Deuteronomy 6:5).

Little wonder then that the Prophet Joseph Smith taught: "It is the first principle of the gospel to know for a certainty the character of God." "I want you all to know Him," he said, "and to be familiar with Him" (History of the Church, 6:305.). We must have "a correct idea of his . . . perfections, and attributes," an admiration for "the excellency of [His] character" (Lectures on Faith (1985), 38, 42.). Thus the first phrase we utter in the declaration of our faith is, "We believe in God, the Eternal Father" (Articles of Faith 1:1.). So, emphatically, did Jesus. Even as He acknowledged His own singular role in the divine plan, the Savior nevertheless insisted on this prayerful preamble: "And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God" (John 17:3).

After generations of prophets had tried to teach the family of man the will and the way of the Father, usually with little success, God in His ultimate effort to have us know Him, sent to earth His Only Begotten and perfect Son, created in His very likeness and image, to live and serve among mortals in the everyday rigors of life.

To come to earth with such a responsibility, to stand in place of Elohim-speaking as He would speak, judging and serving, loving and warning, forbearing and forgiving as He would do-this is a duty of such staggering proportions that you and I cannot comprehend such a thing. But in the loyalty and determination that would be characteristic of a divine child, Jesus could comprehend it and He did it. Then, when the praise and honor began to come, He humbly directed all adulation to the Father.

"The Father . . . doeth the works," He said in earnest. "The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do: for what things soever [the Father] doeth, these also doeth the Son likewise" (John 14:10; 5:19). On another occasion He said: "I speak that which I have seen with my Father." "I do nothing of myself; but as my Father hath taught me." "I came down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but the will of him that sent me" (John 8:38, 28; 6:38).

I make my own heartfelt declaration of God our Eternal Father this morning because some in the contemporary world suffer from a distressing misconception of Him. Among these there is a tendency to feel distant from the Father, even estranged from Him, if they believe in Him at all. And if they do believe, many moderns say they might feel comfortable in the arms of Jesus, but they are uneasy contemplating the stern encounter of God (see William Barclay, The Mind of Jesus (1961), especially the chapter "Looking at the Cross" for a discussion of this modern tendency). Through a misreading (and surely, in some cases, a mistranslation) of the Bible, these see God the Father and Jesus Christ His Son as operating very differently, this in spite of the fact that in both the Old Testament and the New, the Son of God is one and the same, acting as He always does under the direction of the Father, who is Himself the same "yesterday, today, and forever" (for example, 1 Ne. 10:18; 2 Nephi 27:23; Moroni 10:19; D&C 20:12).

In reflecting on these misconceptions we realize that one of the remarkable contributions of the Book of Mormon is its seamless, perfectly consistent view of divinity throughout that majestic book. Here there is no Malachi-to-Matthew gap, no pause while we shift theological gears, no misreading the God who is urgently, lovingly, faithfully at work on every page of that record from its Old Testament beginning to its New Testament end. Yes, in an effort to give the world back its Bible and a correct view of Deity with it, what we have in the Book of Mormon is a uniform view of God in all His glory and goodness, all His richness and complexity-including and especially as again demonstrated through a personal appearance of His Only Begotten Son, Jesus Christ.

How grateful we are for all the scriptures, especially the scriptures of the Restoration, that teach us the majesty of each member of the Godhead. How we would thrill, for example, if all the world would receive and embrace the view of the Father so movingly described in the Pearl of Great Price.

There, in the midst of a grand vision of humankind which heaven opened to his view, Enoch, observing both the blessings and challenges of mortality, turns his gaze toward the Father and is stunned to see Him weeping. He says in wonder and amazement to this most powerful Being in the universe: "How is it that thou canst weep? . . . Thou art just [and] merciful and kind forever; . . . Peace . . . is the habitation of thy throne; and mercy shall go before thy face and have no end; how is it thou canst weep?"

Looking out on the events of almost any day, God replies: "Behold these thy brethren; they are the workmanship of mine own hands. . . . I gave unto them . . . [a] commandment, that they should love one another, and that they should choose me, their Father; but behold, they are without affection, and they hate their own blood. . . . Wherefore should not the heavens weep, seeing these shall suffer?" (Moses 7:29-33, 37)

That single, riveting scene does more to teach the true nature of God than any theological treatise could ever convey. It also helps us understand much more emphatically that vivid moment in the Book of Mormon allegory of the olive tree, when after digging and dunging, watering and weeding, trimming, pruning, transplanting, and grafting, the great Lord of the vineyard throws down his spade and his pruning shears and weeps, crying out to any who would listen, "What could I have done more for my vineyard?" (Jacob 5:41; see also vv. 47, 49)

What an indelible image of God's engagement in our lives! What anguish in a parent when His children do not choose Him nor "the gospel of God" He sent! (Romans 1:1) How easy to love someone who so singularly loves us!

Of course the centuries-long drift away from belief in such a perfect and caring Father hasn't been helped any by the man-made creeds of erring generations which describe God variously as unknown and unknowable----formless, passionless, elusive, ethereal, simultaneously everywhere and nowhere at all. Certainly that does not describe the Being we behold through the eyes of these prophets. Nor does it match the living, breathing, embodied Jesus of Nazareth who was and is in "the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his [Father]" (Hebrews 1:3; see also 2 Corinthians 4:4; Colossians 1:15).

In that sense Jesus did not come to improve God's view of man nearly so much as He came to improve man's view of God and to plead with them to love their Heavenly Father as He has always and will always love them. The plan of God, the power of God, the holiness of God, yes, even the anger and the judgment of God they had occasion to understand. But the love of God, the profound depth of His devotion to His children, they still did not fully know-until Christ came.

So feeding the hungry, healing the sick, rebuking hypocrisy, pleading for faith-this was Christ showing us the way of the Father, He who is "merciful and gracious, slow to anger, long-suffering and full of goodness" (Lectures on Faith, 42). In His life and especially in His death, Christ was declaring, "This is God's compassion I am showing you, as well as that of my own." In the perfect Son's manifestation of the perfect Father's care, in Their mutual suffering and shared sorrow for the sins and heartaches of the rest of us, we see ultimate meaning in the declaration: "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved" (John 3:16-17).

I bear personal witness this day of a personal, living God, who knows our names, hears and answers prayers, and cherishes us eternally as children of His spirit. I testify that amidst the wondrously complex tasks inherent in the universe, He seeks our individual happiness and safety above all other godly concerns. We are created in His very image and likeness (see Genesis 1:26-27; Moses 2:26-27), and Jesus of Nazareth, His Only Begotten Son in the flesh, came to earth as the perfect mortal manifestation of His grandeur. In addition to the witness of the ancients we also have the modern miracle of Palmyra, the appearance of God the Father and His Beloved Son, the Savior of the world, to the boy prophet Joseph Smith. I testify of that appearance, and in the words of that prophet I, too, declare: "Our heavenly Father is more liberal in His views, and boundless in His mercies and blessings, than we are ready to believe or receive. . . . God does not look on sin with [the least degree of] allowance, but . . . the nearer we get to our heavenly Father, the more we are disposed to look with compassion on perishing souls; we feel that we want to take them upon our shoulders, and cast their sins behind our backs" (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, Sel Joseph Fielding Smith [1976], 257, 240-41).

I bear witness of a God who has such shoulders. And in the spirit of the holy apostleship, I say as did one who held this office anciently: "Herein [then] is love, not that we loved God, but that he loved us and sent his Son to be the propitiation for our sins. Beloved, if God so loved us, we ought also to love one another"(1 John 4:10)-and to love Him forever, I pray. In the sacred name of Jesus Christ, amen.

 

THE DIVINE SONSHIP AND THE LAW OF WITNESSES (John 5)

 

JOSEPH F. McCONKIE

 

How are we to know with perfect assurance that Jesus of Nazareth is indeed the Son of God, the fulfillment of the prophets? What obligation rested upon the Nazarene to establish for his own and all future generations his claim to divine Sonship? By what standards are we to assess such assertions? We accept or reject the Christ at the peril of our eternal lives. What evidence are the heavens required to produce to establish the truth of such a claim? And by what standards are we to assess this and like declarations? Such are the matters with which the Gospel, or Testimony, of John deals. No chapter in that Gospel does so more directly than the fifth chapter.

 

Two major themes dominate this chapter of John: Christ's repeated affirmation that he had been sent of the Father, that he could do nothing of himself, that he received no honor from men, that he came in his Father's name to do his Father's will; and the evidences or testimonies of his divine Sonship. Every word and event in the chapter is directed to the accomplishment of that dual purpose. The events of this day center in his healing a lame man at the pool of Bethesda and subsequently giving a great discourse on the grounds of the temple in which he testified in perfect plainness that he was God's Son. He further challenged his detractors to return to the scriptures for collaboration of his testimony, with the warning that to reject him in the name of Moses would but cause Moses to be their accuser on the day of judgment. We have read the story often; let us now ponder its implications.

 

Jesus as Lord of the Sabbath

 

The setting of our story finds us in Jerusalem at feast time, either Passover or Purim (on which, scholars are divided). Of a certainty it was the Sabbath, that holy day upon which servile work was to cease and the children of the Lord of the Sabbath were to identify themselves by keeping the day holy. Yet the long years that separated this people from the announcement of Sinai and the covenants associated therewith had witnessed a perversion of those covenants in general and of this day in particular, a perversion that astounds the modern mind. The refreshing waters of the Sabbath had become as the Dead Sea, a place in which there was no life, while the fertile lands of faith had been so heavily salted with traditions and ritual that no living thing could survive in their parched soil. The rabbis had determined thirty-nine chief or principal types of work that were forbidden. In application, this came to mean that "scattering two seeds was sowing; sweeping away or breaking a single clod was ploughing; plucking one blade of grass was sin; watering fruit or removing a withered leaf was forbidden; picking fruit, or even lifting it from the ground, was reaping; cutting a mushroom was a double sin, one both of harvesting and of sowing, for a new one would grow in place of the old; fishing, or anything that put an end to life, ranked with harvesting; rubbing ears of corn together, or anything else connected with food, was classed as binding of sheaves." fn One could spit upon a rock but not upon the ground, for by scratching the earth you were guilty of cultivating. You could eat an egg laid by a fryer on the Sabbath but not an egg laid by a laying hen, because it was not the work of a fryer to produce eggs. Such distinctions, which went on endlessly, included prohibition against administering to the sick or afflicted. A broken bone could not be set or a dislocated joint put back, for if this were done, the body would start to heal itself, thus causing it to work. However, it was ruled that labor could be performed to save life. Thus, if someone were buried under ruins on the Sabbath, they might be dug and taken out if they were found alive, but if dead, they were to be left until the Sabbath was over.

 

Christ, who kept with exactness and honor the law as given on Sinai, had no reverence for these trappings with which men had embellished that law. It is not for mortals to tamper with the commandments of God, either adding to or taking therefrom; those doing so build upon a sandy foundation, and the gates of hell open to receive them. (See 3 Ne. 11:39-40.) Thus with deliberation and intent Christ sought for one in need of his healing powers that holy day, one upon whom a miracle could properly be performed. How more perfectly to dramatize the issue—was the love of his fellow Jews centered in the God who made them or in traditions of their own making? Would they rejoice in the healing of their brother or would they offend the very spirit of the Sabbath with anger that some inconsequential taboo of their concocting had been violated?

 

Among those with whom Christ chose to honor his Father in worship that day were the afflicted souls who stood vigil over the waters of the pool of Bethesda. It was their tradition, of what origin we know not, that the first of their number to enter the waters when they were disturbed, supposedly by an angel, would be healed. The pool was evidently a mineral spring whose waters bubbled intermittently as escaping gases broke the surface. Among those gathered that morning was a man who had been crippled for thirty-eight years. Jesus addressed him, asking, "Wilt thou be made whole?" The man responded that because of his infirmity he was unable to reach the troubled waters first, and that he could do so only with the help of another. Jesus then told him, "Rise, take up thy bed, and walk." Without hesitation, the man—impotent in body but not in faith—responded to God's Son and took up his bed and walked. (See John 5:6-9.)

 

The scripture records no rejoicing at the man's good fortune, nor does it contain any hint that his nation saw reason to praise God for the miracle they had witnessed. We read no commendation of Jesus, no suggestion that he might be their long-promised Messiah, but rather condemnation of a man who carried his bed on the Sabbath day and efforts to kill the person who directed him to do so. It was the tradition that was loved and honored, not the living Christ.

 

Jesus Proclaims His Divine Sonship

 

The scene of our story now shifts to the temple ground, where Christ had gone to teach. It was there that he was identified as the one who had defiled holy traditions by healing a man. The bitter opposition of the people had the desired effect of attracting a sizeable multitude; among their number were those, howbeit few in number, who would hear with listening ears. Jesus was readily condemned for his violation of the Sabbath, yet we are left to wonder at the nature of his offense. He of himself had lifted no burden, he had administered no medicine, he had walked no more than the requisite number of steps the rabbis had decreed appropriate, he had done no work save that of the Spirit, he had done nothing save utter the healing words. No charges, according to their system of legalism, were brought against him, yet he had shown his disdain for that system in his direction to another to defy it. If there be sin in what had transpired, it rested with God, for it was his power that worked that day to perform the miracle of healing.

 

The matter of healing and the petty Sabbath observances were of little interest to Christ. It is not of such things that he chose to speak. The occasion could not pass save he used it to declare his own divine Sonship. Thus he responded to their charges, saying, "My Father worketh hitherto, and I work." (John 5:17.) The implication of the statement was lost on none. If God, who is his Father, chose to do works of righteousness on the Sabbath, can he as his Son choose to do less?

 

We need no other evidence as to how completely and perfectly Christ's testimony of his divine Sonship was understood than the subsequent efforts to kill him. Now he had added the charge of blasphemy to that of breaking the Sabbath. Again his testimony was distorted—his announcement that he was God's Son was perverted to be an announcement that he was equal with God. Christ said no such thing. He did say he was God's Son, that as God's Son he could do "nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do," and that he had been sent of the Father. He testified of the power that was in God and announced that to reject him was to reject the Father, and conversely to accept his word and believe in him was to believe in the Father and accept him. To those who did so, he promised eternal life, while those who rejected his testimony were assured condemnation. (John 5:19-24.)

 

Jesus Announces Himself as God of the Living and the Dead

 

Having announced his divine Sonship and having made the acceptance or rejection of his claim the hinge upon which the door of salvation swings, Christ then responded to the question that must be the natural sequel to such an announcement. If, indeed, he was the Messiah, and if the acceptance of him was the central point of salvation, what becomes of the innumerable host who had died without a knowledge of him? 'My Father has "committed all judgment" to me,' he had declared. (John 5:22.) No plainer statement professing Messiahship could be given. If he was to render justice to all, and surely God could do no less, how were those who died without the knowledge of him to be judged? Such was the matter to which Christ then responded: "The hour is coming, and now is, when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God: and they that hear shall live. For as the Father hath life in himself; so hath he given to the Son to have life in himself; and hath given him authority to execute judgment also, because he is the Son of man. Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice, and shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation." (John 5:25-29.)

 

We could paraphrase Christ's words thus: In very fact you live in the age and generation in which this same gospel will be taught to those who are dead, that they might be judged according to men in the flesh. They too must accept or reject my claim to divine Sonship, and they too must do so at the peril of their eternal lives. Indeed, all must have the opportunity to hear. This I do because I have inherited from our Father that power of life which is in him. From my mortal mother, Mary, I inherited the gift of death. From God, who fathered this earthly tabernacle, I have life within myself. The power to break the bands of death is mine, and through me all will come forth in the resurrection—the good to everlasting life, the evil to everlasting damnation. fn

 

Of John's statement that there are but two resurrections—that of the just and that of the unjust—Elder Bruce R. McConkie observed: "With the exception of the statement in James (Jas. 1:5) which led to the appearance of the Father and the Son to the Prophet, thus ushering in the dispensation of the fullness of times, this one verse has probably done more to open the door to the mysteries of salvation than any other single verse of scripture. It is the verse that paid off a thousand fold for all the struggle that ever went in to the preparation of the Inspired Version of the Bible, for it was meditation upon this verse that caused the Prophet to receive the vision of the degrees of glory." fn

 

"While we were doing the work of translation, which the Lord had appointed unto us," Joseph Smith wrote, "[this verse] was given unto us as follows—speaking of the resurrection of the dead, concerning those who shall hear the voice of the Son of Man: and shall come forth; they who have done good, in the resurrection of the just; and they who have done evil, in the resurrection of the unjust. Now this caused us to marvel, for it was given unto us of the Spirit. And while we meditated upon these things, the Lord touched the eyes of our understandings and they were opened, and the glory of the Lord shone round about. And we beheld. . . ." (D&C 76:15-20.) Then follows the vision of the degrees of glory, one of the most marvelous visions ever penned by a prophet.

 

Jesus Obeys the Law of Witnesses

 

If there be justice in the heavens, the matter of accepting or rejecting Jesus as our Savior cannot be a matter of good fortune contrasted with another's misjudgment. There must be a divinely ordained system whereby all might know with perfect surety those truths upon which salvation rests, and so there is. The laws that govern heaven assure that all, be it in this life or the next, will be granted full and complete opportunity to hear the gospel message. As a birthright, all are bequeathed the light of Christ, and all may lay claim to the companionship of the Holy Ghost through purity and obedience. Further, we have been assured that all saving truths will have both manifestation and confirmation. The divine law states it thus: "In the mouth of two or three witnesses shall every word be established." (2 Cor. 13:1.) No testimony is to stand alone. There are no exceptions: the message of all who would claim themselves prophets must comply with this heaven-given standard. It is for this very reason that the Godhead consists of three separate and distinct personages—two Gods to bear witness of the third. Thus Christ explained: "I bear record of the Father, and the Father beareth record of me, and the Holy Ghost beareth record of the Father and me." (3 Ne. 11:32.)

 

It was absolutely essential that Christ comply with this principle in his mortal ministry. Had he failed to do so, none would be obligated to accept his claim to Messiahship. Knowing this, the Pharisees came to him, saying, "Thou bearest record of thyself; thy record is not true." (John 8:13.) Responding to their challenge, Jesus replied: "I am not alone, but I and the Father that sent me. It is also written in your law, that the testimony of two men is true. I am one that bear witness of myself, and the Father that sent me beareth witness of me." (John 8:16-18.)

 

In the text before us, Christ is recorded as saying, "If I bear witness of myself, my witness is not true." (John 5:31.) In his inspired translation, Joseph Smith rendered the verse, "I bear witness of myself, yet my witness is true." (JST, John 5:32.) In either case the sense is the same—his testimony cannot stand alone. In this instance Christ appealed to the witness of John the Baptist, who came as "a burning and shining light" to prepare the hearts of mortals to accept Jesus as the Christ. John came declaring the gospel of repentance, so that we might see with pure eyes; he came baptizing, so that the cataracts of sin might not impede our vision; he came announcing Jesus of Nazareth as the Lamb of God. (See John 5:32-35; 1:36.)

 

In addition, Christ cited the works he had done as evidence of his divine nature. (John 5:36.) Every miracle he performed, every word he preached, every prophecy he uttered, had one common element: to testify of him as the great Redeemer. To this he added the witness of his Father, who had rent the heavens—and would do so again—and who in audible voice proclaimed Jesus of Nazareth as his Son. (John 5:37-38.) Jesus then cited yet another evidence that he was what he professed to be—the testimony of the scriptures. To those who used the scriptures to war against him, he said, "Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me." (John 5:39.)

 

Oh, how foolish is mind of anyone to suppose that eternal life is to be found within a book rather than in the living witness of the Spirit. No people have professed a greater love for the scriptures than those who have used them as the pretext to reject the Lord's anointed, and as they rejected those who came in his name, so they rejected him. To those of his day, those who rejected him in the name of loyalty to the law of Moses, Christ said, "Do not think that I will accuse you to the Father: There is one that accuseth you, even Moses, in whom ye trust." (John 5:45.) Moses, who under divine direction established a law every jot and tittle of which was intended to testify of Christ and prepare a people to accept him, will, of all men, be most offended by that which has been done inappropriately in his name.

 

There is a marvelous constancy in the spirit of disbelief; to find it in one dispensation is to know it in others. In our day some claim allegiance to Peter, while rejecting his testimony that in the last days there would be a restoration of all things (see Acts 3:19-21); others pay homage to Paul, while ignoring his injunction that we must "work out [our] own salvation with fear and trembling" (Philip. 2:12). It is not without significance that in our day those who are the most vociferous in their defense of the Bible are also the most selective in what they choose to see within its covers. Like the Pharisees, their ancient counterparts, they read with blind eyes—one blinded by their traditions, the other with their excessive zeal. In the meridian of time, the scriptures were used to reject Christ and his servants. Their ancient craft has been bequeathed to modern successors, who in like manner use the Bible to sustain their position of spiritual supremacy and salvation while rejecting the living Christ and his servants who have been commissioned to proclaim the message of the restoration. The story of John 5 is as much the story of our day as it is the story of ancient days.

 

NOTES

 

Joseph F. McConkie is associate professor of ancient scripture at Brigham Young University.

 

Footnotes

 

1. Bruce R. McConkie, The Mortal Messiah, 4 vols. (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1979-81), 1:207.

 

2. The Gospels, and that of John in particular, are full of such statements. We are left to wonder about the rather astonishing ignorance manifest in discussions and writings that question whether Christ ever announced himself as divine.

 

3. Bruce R. McConkie, Doctrinal New Testament Commentary, 3 vols. (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1965-73), 1:195.

 

 

(Kent P. Jackson and Robert L. Millet, eds., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 5: The Gospels [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1986], 279.)

(Doctrine and Covenants 138:13.) – Broken heart, consecration of all to the family of God.  We serve with all of our heart, might, mind, and strength to build up the kingdom.  There is complete unselfishness; focus on saving the family, there is a free will offering we give voluntarily.

 

13 And who had offered sacrifice in the similitude of the great sacrifice of the Son of God, and had suffered tribulation in their Redeemer's name.

 

 

 

We can work on becoming perfected on the things we say and how we treat others. 

 

The Tongue of Angels

Elder Jeffrey R. Holland
Of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles

Our words, like our deeds, should be filled with faith and hope and charity.

The Prophet Joseph Smith deepened our understanding of the power of speech when he taught, "It is by words . . . [that] every being works when he works by faith. God said, 'Let there be light: and there was light.' Joshua spake, and the great lights which God had created stood still. Elijah commanded, and the heavens were stayed for the space of three years and six months, so that it did not rain. . . . All this was done by faith. . . . Faith, then, works by words; and with [words] its mightiest works have been, and will be, performed."1 Like all gifts "which cometh from above," words are "sacred, and must be spoken with care, and by constraint of the Spirit."2

It is with this realization of the power and sanctity of words that I wish to caution us, if caution is needed, regarding how we speak to each other and how we speak of ourselves.

There is a line from the Apocrypha which puts the seriousness of this issue better than I can. It reads, "The stroke of the whip maketh marks in the flesh: but the stroke of the tongue breaketh the bones."3 With that stinging image in mind, I was particularly impressed to read in the book of James that there was a way I could be "a perfect man."

Said James: "For in many things we offend all. [But] if any man offend not in word, the same is a perfect man, and able also to bridle the whole body."

Continuing the imagery of the bridle, he writes: "Behold, we put bits in the horses' mouths, that they may obey us; and we turn about their whole body.

"Behold also . . . ships, which though they be . . . great, and are driven of fierce winds, yet are they turned about with a very small helm."

Then James makes his point: "The tongue is [also] a little member. . . . [But] behold, how great a [forest (Greek)] a little fire [can burn].

" . . . So is the tongue [a fire] among our members, . . . it defileth the whole body, . . . it is set on fire of hell.

"For every kind of beasts, and of birds, and of serpents, and of things in the sea, . . . hath been tamed of mankind:

"But the tongue can no man tame; it is an unruly evil, full of deadly poison.

"Therewith bless we God, even the Father; and therewith curse we men, which are made after the similitude of God.

"Out of the same mouth proceedeth blessing and cursing. My brethren, these things ought not so to be."4

Well, that is pretty straightforward! Obviously James doesn't mean our tongues are always iniquitous, nor that everything we say is "full of deadly poison." But he clearly means that at least some things we say can be destructive, even venomous—and that is a chilling indictment for a Latter-day Saint! The voice that bears profound testimony, utters fervent prayer, and sings the hymns of Zion can be the same voice that berates and criticizes, embarrasses and demeans, inflicts pain and destroys the spirit of oneself and of others in the process. "Out of the same mouth proceedeth blessing and cursing," James grieves. "My brethren [and sisters], these things ought not so to be."

Is this something we could all work on just a little? Is this an area in which we could each try to be a little more like a "perfect" man or woman?

Husbands, you have been entrusted with the most sacred gift God can give you—a wife, a daughter of God, the mother of your children who has voluntarily given herself to you for love and joyful companionship. Think of the kind things you said when you were courting, think of the blessings you have given with hands placed lovingly upon her head, think of yourself and of her as the god and goddess you both inherently are, and then reflect on other moments characterized by cold, caustic, unbridled words. Given the damage that can be done with our tongues, little wonder the Savior said, "Not that which goeth into the mouth defileth a man; but that which cometh out of the mouth, this defileth a man."5 A husband who would never dream of striking his wife physically can break, if not her bones, then certainly her heart by the brutality of thoughtless or unkind speech. Physical abuse is uniformly and unequivocally condemned in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. If it is possible to be more condemning than that, we speak even more vigorously against all forms of sexual abuse. Today, I speak against verbal and emotional abuse of anyone against anyone, but especially of husbands against wives. Brethren, these things ought not to be.

In that same spirit we speak to the sisters as well, for the sin of verbal abuse knows no gender. Wives, what of the unbridled tongue in your mouth, of the power for good or ill in your words? How is it that such a lovely voice which by divine nature is so angelic, so close to the veil, so instinctively gentle and inherently kind could ever in a turn be so shrill, so biting, so acrid and untamed? A woman's words can be more piercing than any dagger ever forged, and they can drive the people they love to retreat beyond a barrier more distant than anyone in the beginning of that exchange could ever have imagined. Sisters, there is no place in that magnificent spirit of yours for acerbic or abrasive expression of any kind, including gossip or backbiting or catty remarks. Let it never be said of our home or our ward or our neighborhood that "the tongue is a fire, a world of iniquity . . . [burning] among our members."

May I expand this counsel to make it a full family matter. We must be so careful in speaking to a child. What we say or don't say, how we say it and when is so very, very important in shaping a child's view of himself or herself. But it is even more important in shaping that child's faith in us and their faith in God. Be constructive in your comments to a child—always. Never tell them, even in whimsy, that they are fat or dumb or lazy or homely. You would never do that maliciously, but they remember and may struggle for years trying to forget—and to forgive. And try not to compare your children, even if you think you are skillful at it. You may say most positively that "Susan is pretty and Sandra is bright," but all Susan will remember is that she isn't bright and Sandra that she isn't pretty. Praise each child individually for what that child is, and help him or her escape our culture's obsession with comparing, competing, and never feeling we are "enough."

In all of this, I suppose it goes without saying that negative speaking so often flows from negative thinking, including negative thinking about ourselves. We see our own faults, we speak—or at least think—critically of ourselves, and before long that is how we see everyone and everything. No sunshine, no roses, no promise of hope or happiness. Before long we and everybody around us are miserable.

I love what Elder Orson F. Whitney once said: "The spirit of the gospel is optimistic; it trusts in God and looks on the bright side of things. The opposite or pessimistic spirit drags men down and away from God, looks on the dark side, murmurs, complains, and is slow to yield obedience."6 We should honor the Savior's declaration to "be of good cheer."7 (Indeed, it seems to me we may be more guilty of breaking that commandment than almost any other!) Speak hopefully. Speak encouragingly, including about yourself. Try not to complain and moan incessantly. As someone once said, "Even in the golden age of civilization someone undoubtedly grumbled that everything looked too yellow."

I have often thought that Nephi's being bound with cords and beaten by rods must have been more tolerable to him than listening to Laman and Lemuel's constant murmuring.8 Surely he must have said at least once, "Hit me one more time. I can still hear you." Yes, life has its problems, and yes, there are negative things to face, but please accept one of Elder Holland's maxims for living—no misfortune is so bad that whining about it won't make it worse.

Paul put it candidly, but very hopefully. He said to all of us: "Let no corrupt communication proceed out of your mouth, but [only] that which is good . . . [and] edifying, that it may minister grace unto the hearers.

"And grieve not the holy Spirit of God. . . . 

"Let all bitterness, and wrath, and anger, and clamour, and evil speaking, be put away from you. . . . 

"And be ye kind one to another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, even as God for Christ's sake hath forgiven you."9

In his deeply moving final testimony, Nephi calls us to "follow the Son [of God], with full purpose of heart," promising that "after ye have . . . received the baptism of fire and of the Holy Ghost, [ye] can speak with a new tongue, yea, even with the tongue of angels. . . . And . . . how could ye speak with the tongue of angels save it were by the Holy Ghost? Angels speak by the power of the Holy Ghost; wherefore, they speak the words of Christ."10 Indeed, Christ was and is "the Word," according to John the Beloved,11 full of grace and truth, full of mercy and compassion.

So, brothers and sisters, in this long eternal quest to be more like our Savior, may we try to be "perfect" men and women in at least this one way now—by offending not in word, or more positively put, by speaking with a new tongue, the tongue of angels. Our words, like our deeds, should be filled with faith and hope and charity, the three great Christian imperatives so desperately needed in the world today. With such words, spoken under the influence of the Spirit, tears can be dried, hearts can be healed, lives can be elevated, hope can return, confidence can prevail. I pray that my words, even on this challenging subject, will be encouraging to you, not discouraging, that you can hear in my voice that I love you, because I do. More importantly, please know that your Father in Heaven loves you and so does His Only Begotten Son. When They speak to you—and They will—it will not be in the wind, nor in the earthquake, nor in the fire, but it will be with a voice still and small, a voice tender and kind.12 It will be with the tongue of angels. May we all rejoice in the thought that when we say edifying, encouraging things unto the least of these, our brethren and sisters and little ones, we say it unto God.13 In the name of Jesus Christ, amen.


NOTES

1. Lectures on Faith (1985), 72–73; emphasis added.
2. D&C 63:64.
3. Ecclesiasticus 28:17.
4. James 3:2–10; emphasis added.
5. Matthew 15:11.
6. In Conference Report, Apr. 1917, 43.
7. Matthew 14:27; Mark 6:50; John 16:33.
8. See 1 Nephi 3:28–31; 18:11–15.
9. Ephesians 4:29–32.
10. 2 Nephi 31:13–14; 32:2–3.
11. John 1:1.
12. See 1 Kings 19:11–12.
13. See Matthew 25:40.

 

(John 5:29.) – The verse that led to D&C 76.   We need to do the will of the Father if you want the highest glory in the Celestial kingdom.

 

29 And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.

 

 

(John 5:30-42.) – Christ only does the will of the Father.  Law of witnesses:  1. Heavenly Father, 2. The Holy Ghost, 3. John the Baptist

 

30 I can of mine own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me.

 

31 If I bear witness of myself, my witness is not true.

 

32 ¶ There is another that beareth witness of me; and I know that the witness which he witnesseth of me is true.

 

33 Ye sent unto John, and he bare witness unto the truth.

 

34 But I receive not testimony from man: but these things I say, that ye might be saved.

 

35 He was a burning and a shining light: and ye were willing for a season to rejoice in his light.

 

36 ¶ But I have greater witness than that of John: for the works which the Father hath given me to finish, the same works that I do, bear witness of me, that the Father hath sent me.

 

37 And the Father himself, which hath sent me, hath borne witness of me. Ye have neither heard his voice at any time, nor seen his shape.

 

38 And ye have not his word abiding in you: for whom he hath sent, him ye believe not.

 

39 ¶ Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me.

 

40 And ye will not come to me, that ye might have life.

 

41 I receive not honour from men.

 

42 But I know you, that ye have not the love of God in you.

 

 

Verse 39 – If you search the scriptures you will find they testify of me.  The Pharisees didn’t grasp His message; the oral interpretation was enough for them.  If you had a knowledge of the scriptures that was also enough to be saved, they missed the point, it isn’t the action of reading but the product reading produces that saves.

 

The product is to realize who Christ is and that He is doing God’s will and we need to be like Him and do God’s will also.  We are saved by the Atonement and what we have become.

 

Verse 42 – Our motive should be to love the Lord and show this love by doing God’s will.  Our motive should not be for blessings or out of duty as a job to do.  Christ does not seek for glory for himself.

 

 

The Challenge to Become

Elder Dallin H. Oaks
Ensign, Nov. 2000, pp. 32-34

The Apostle Paul taught that the Lord's teachings and teachers were given that we may all attain "the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ" (Eph. 4:13). This process requires far more than acquiring knowledge. It is not even enough for us to be convinced of the gospel; we must act and think so that we are converted by it. In contrast to the institutions of the world, which teach us to know something, the gospel of Jesus Christ challenges us to become something.

Many Bible and modern scriptures speak of a final judgment at which all persons will be rewarded according to their deeds or works or the desires of their hearts. But other scriptures enlarge upon this by referring to our being judged by the condition we have achieved.

The prophet Nephi describes the Final Judgment in terms of what we have become: "And if their works have been filthiness they must needs be filthy; and if they be filthy it must needs be that they cannot dwell in the kingdom of God" (1 Ne. 15:33; emphasis added). Moroni declares, "He that is filthy shall be filthy still; and he that is righteous shall be righteous still" (Morm. 9:14; emphasis added; see also Rev. 22:11-12; 2 Ne. 9:16; D&C 88:35). The same would be true of "selfish" or "disobedient" or any other personal attribute inconsistent with the requirements of God. Referring to the "state" of the wicked in the Final Judgment, Alma explains that if we are condemned by our words, our works, and our thoughts, "we shall not be found spotless; . . . and in this awful state we shall not dare to look up to our God" (Alma 12:14).

From such teachings we conclude that the Final Judgment is not just an evaluation of a sum total of good and evil acts--what we have done. It is an acknowledgment of the final effect of our acts and thoughts--what we have become. It is not enough for anyone just to go through the motions. The commandments, ordinances, and covenants of the gospel are not a list of deposits required to be made in some heavenly account. The gospel of Jesus Christ is a plan that shows us how to become what our Heavenly Father desires us to become.

A parable illustrates this understanding. A wealthy father knew that if he were to bestow his wealth upon a child who had not yet developed the needed wisdom and stature, the inheritance would probably be wasted. The father said to his child:

"All that I have I desire to give you--not only my wealth, but also my position and standing among men. That which I have I can easily give you, but that which I am you must obtain for yourself. You will qualify for your inheritance by learning what I have learned and by living as I have lived. I will give you the laws and principles by which I have acquired my wisdom and stature. Follow my example, mastering as I have mastered, and you will become as I am, and all that I have will be yours."

This parable parallels the pattern of heaven. The gospel of Jesus Christ promises the incomparable inheritance of eternal life, the fulness of the Father, and reveals the laws and principles by which it can be obtained.

We qualify for eternal life through a process of conversion. As used here, this word of many meanings signifies not just a convincing but a profound change of nature. Jesus used this meaning when he taught His chief Apostle the difference between a testimony and a conversion. Jesus asked his disciples, "Whom do men say that I the Son of man am?" (Matt. 16:13). Next He asked, "But whom say ye that I am?

"And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God.

"And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Bar-jona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven" (Matt. 16:15-17).

Peter had a testimony. He knew that Jesus was the Christ, the promised Messiah, and he declared it. To testify is to know and to declare.

Later on, Jesus taught these same men about conversion, which is far more than testimony. When the disciples asked who was the greatest in the kingdom of heaven, "Jesus called a little child unto him, and set him in the midst of them,

"And said, Verily I say unto you, Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.

"Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, the same is greatest in the kingdom of heaven" (Matt. 18:2-4; emphasis added).

Later, the Savior confirmed the importance of being converted, even for those with a testimony of the truth. In the sublime instructions given at the Last Supper, He told Simon Peter, "I have prayed for thee, that thy faith fail not: and when thou art converted, strengthen thy brethren" (Luke 22:32).

In order to strengthen his brethren--to nourish and lead the flock of God--this man who had followed Jesus for three years, who had been given the authority of the holy apostleship, who had been a valiant teacher and testifier of the Christian gospel, and whose testimony had caused the Master to declare him blessed still had to be "converted."

Jesus' challenge shows that the conversion He required for those who would enter the kingdom of heaven (see Matt. 18:3) was far more than just being converted to testify to the truthfulness of the gospel. To testify is to know and to declare. The gospel challenges us to be "converted," which requires us to do and to become. If any of us relies solely upon our knowledge and testimony of the gospel, we are in the same position as the blessed but still unfinished Apostles whom Jesus challenged to be "converted." We all know someone who has a strong testimony but does not act upon it so as to be converted. For example, returned missionaries, are you still seeking to be converted, or are you caught up in the ways of the world?

The needed conversion by the gospel begins with the introductory experience the scriptures call being "born again" (e.g., Mosiah 27:25; Alma 5:49; John 3:7; 1 Pet. 1:23). In the waters of baptism and by receiving the gift of the Holy Ghost, we become the spiritual "sons and daughters" of Jesus Christ, "new creatures" who can "inherit the kingdom of God" (Mosiah 27:25-26).

In teaching the Nephites, the Savior referred to what they must become. He challenged them to repent and be baptized and be sanctified by the reception of the Holy Ghost, "that ye may stand spotless before me at the last day" (3 Ne. 27:20). He concluded: "Therefore, what manner of men ought ye to be? Verily I say unto you, even as I am" (3 Ne. 27:27).

The gospel of Jesus Christ is the plan by which we can become what children of God are supposed to become. This spotless and perfected state will result from a steady succession of covenants, ordinances, and actions, an accumulation of right choices, and from continuing repentance. "This life is the time for men to prepare to meet God" (Alma 34:32).

Now is the time for each of us to work toward our personal conversion, toward becoming what our Heavenly Father desires us to become. As we do so, we should remember that our family relationships--even more than our Church callings--are the setting in which the most important part of that development can occur. The conversion we must achieve requires us to be a good husband and father or a good wife and mother. Being a successful Church leader is not enough. Exaltation is an eternal family experience, and it is our mortal family experiences that are best suited to prepare us for it.

The Apostle John spoke of what we are challenged to become when he said: "Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is" (1 Jn. 3:2; see also Moro. 7:48).

I hope the importance of conversion and becoming will cause our local leaders to reduce their concentration on statistical measures of actions and to focus more on what our brothers and sisters are and what they are striving to become.

Our needed conversions are often achieved more readily by suffering and adversity than by comfort and tranquillity, as Elder Hales taught us so beautifully this morning. Father Lehi promised his son Jacob that God would "consecrate [his] afflictions for [his] gain" (2 Ne. 2:2). The Prophet Joseph was promised that "thine adversity and thine afflictions shall be but a small moment; and then, if thou endure it well, God shall exalt thee on high" (D&C 121:7-8).

Most of us experience some measure of what the scriptures call "the furnace of affliction" (Isa. 48:10; 1 Ne. 20:10). Some are submerged in service to a disadvantaged family member. Others suffer the death of a loved one or the loss or postponement of a righteous goal like marriage or childbearing. Still others struggle with personal impairments or with feelings of rejection, inadequacy, or depression. Through the justice and mercy of a loving Father in Heaven, the refinement and sanctification possible through such experiences can help us achieve what God desires us to become.

We are challenged to move through a process of conversion toward that status and condition called eternal life. This is achieved not just by doing what is right, but by doing it for the right reason--for the pure love of Christ. The Apostle Paul illustrated this in his famous teaching about the importance of charity (see 1 Cor. 13). The reason charity never fails and the reason charity is greater than even the most significant acts of goodness he cited is that charity, "the pure love of Christ" (Moro. 7:47), is not an act but a condition or state of being. Charity is attained through a succession of acts that result in a conversion. Charity is something one becomes. Thus, as Moroni declared, "except men shall have charity they cannot inherit" the place prepared for them in the mansions of the Father (Ether 12:34; emphasis added).

All of this helps us understand an important meaning of the parable of the laborers in the vineyard, which the Savior gave to explain what the kingdom of heaven is like. As you remember, the owner of the vineyard hired laborers at different times of the day. Some he sent into the vineyard early in the morning, others about the third hour, and others in the sixth and ninth hours. Finally, in the eleventh hour he sent others into the vineyard, promising that he would also pay them "whatsoever is right" (Matt. 20:7).

At the end of the day the owner of the vineyard gave the same wage to every worker, even to those who had come in the eleventh hour. When those who had worked the entire day saw this, "they murmured against the goodman of the house" (Matt. 20:11). The owner did not yield but merely pointed out that he had done no one any wrong, since he had paid each man the agreed amount.

Like other parables, this one can teach several different and valuable principles. For present purposes its lesson is that the Master's reward in the Final Judgment will not be based on how long we have labored in the vineyard. We do not obtain our heavenly reward by punching a time clock. What is essential is that our labors in the workplace of the Lord have caused us to become something. For some of us, this requires a longer time than for others. What is important in the end is what we have become by our labors. Many who come in the eleventh hour have been refined and prepared by the Lord in ways other than formal employment in the vineyard. These workers are like the prepared dry mix to which it is only necessary to "add water"--the perfecting ordinance of baptism and the gift of the Holy Ghost. With that addition--even in the eleventh hour--these workers are in the same state of development and qualified to receive the same reward as those who have labored long in the vineyard.

This parable teaches us that we should never give up hope and loving associations with family members and friends whose fine qualities (see Moro. 7:5-14) evidence their progress toward what a loving Father would have them become. Similarly, the power of the Atonement and the principle of repentance show that we should never give up on loved ones who now seem to be making many wrong choices.

Instead of being judgmental about others, we should be concerned about ourselves. We must not give up hope. We must not stop striving. We are children of God, and it is possible for us to become what our Heavenly Father would have us become.

How can we measure our progress? The scriptures suggest various ways. I will mention only two.

After King Benjamin's great sermon, many of his hearers cried out that the Spirit of the Lord "has wrought a mighty change in us, or in our hearts, that we have no more disposition to do evil, but to do good continually" (Mosiah 5:2). If we are losing our desire to do evil, we are progressing toward our heavenly goal.

The Apostle Paul said that persons who have received the Spirit of God "have the mind of Christ" (1 Cor. 2:16). I understand this to mean that persons who are proceeding toward the needed conversion are beginning to see things as our Heavenly Father and His Son, Jesus Christ, see them. They are hearing His voice instead of the voice of the world, and they are doing things in His way instead of by the ways of the world.

I testify of Jesus Christ, our Savior and our Redeemer, whose Church this is. I testify with gratitude of the plan of the Father under which, through the Resurrection and Atonement of our Savior, we have the assurance of immortality and the opportunity to become what is necessary for eternal life. In the name of Jesus Christ, amen.

(John 6:51-57.) – Christ is the bread of life; He gave his soul for the kingdom.  We are given the lesser portion of the word, our faith is tested, and we won’t receive full understanding until we receive the greater portion.  Teaching to doctrine of the Sacrament

 

51 I am the living bread which came down from heaven: if any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.

 

52 The Jews therefore strove among themselves, saying, How can this man give us his flesh to eat?

 

53 Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you.

 

54 Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

 

55 For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed.

 

56 He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him.

 

57 As the living Father hath sent me, and I live by the Father: so he that eateth me, even he shall live by me.

 

Come unto Christ – If you want to be as God we need to live the life of Christ because Christ lives by the will of the Father.  John is telling us who Christ is, he does this through the 7 “I Am’s”

 

John handles the temptations of Christ in real life situations which are different then the other gospel writers.

 

1.  I am the Bread of Life – I do the will of the Father, many left Him after this saying

 

(John 6:35.)

 

35 And Jesus said unto them, I am the bread of life: he that cometh to me shall never hunger; and he that believeth on me shall never thirst.

 

(John 6:48.)

 

48 I am that bread of life.

 

 

John's Testimony of the Bread of Life

 

Thomas R. Valletta, CES Area Coordinator, Chicago, Illinois

 

The sixth chapter of John, which includes the Bread of Life discourse, bears powerful testimony of the divinity of Jesus Christ. This paper suggests five main points for consideration: John's account of events surrounding the sermon are part of his personal testimony; the Beloved Disciple wrote with an abundance of symbolism; events in this chapter are patterned after Exodus typology; the Bread of Life discourse can be more fully understood within the context of the entire chapter John 6; John takes the similitudes of the first Passover, the Exodus, and the miraculous manna in the wilderness and blends them with the emblems of the sacrament of the Lord's Supper in his testimony of Jesus Christ as the living bread.

 

The Gospel of John as Personal Testimony

 

The closing lines of John's Gospel contain an inspired confirmation "that his testimony is true" (John 21:24). When the Prophet Joseph Smith translated the "Gospel of St. John," he altered the title to the "Testimony of St. John." fn This change is in concert with the Lord's own reference to "John's testimony concerning me" (D&C 88:141). John's personal witness of the Savior reflects his own distinctive style and emphasis. He does not include everything the Savior taught and accomplished but only that which supports his own purpose in writing (John 21:25; 20:30). His avowed purpose is "that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing ye might have life through his name" (John 20:31). What John includes and how he includes it often vary from the content of the synoptic Gospels. One could credit some of these peculiarities to the time, place, and audience of his writing, but even a cursory reading of his testimony reveals dissimilarities that run deeper than the setting. Reading the sermon of the Bread of Life and its surrounding narrative as testimony assists us in several ways. S. Kent Brown summarizes the value of studying each of the Gospels as individual testimonies: "In the first place, one is invited to treat each Gospel as possessing a certain integrity in its story of the Master. Secondly, one can come to sense how four authors—each from a different background and each needing to address a different audience—met the sacred task of writing about the Savior. Thirdly, one comes to realize that it was the concerns of the evangelists that frequently influenced what they included in their accounts." fn But reading the Gospels as testimonies has potential pitfalls. One caution is given by Dr. Brown: "The flaw submerged in the modern study of the redactional or editorial activity of the evangelists consists of highlighting the compositional work of each Gospel writer with an unfortunate corresponding de-emphasis on the information that concerns the Savior." fn It should also be noted that though John brings his own perspective, style, and emphasis to his account, he also wrote by the power of the Holy Ghost and by divine approval (D&C 93:6). His words, as scripture, constitute "the will of the Lord . . . the mind of the Lord . . . the word of the Lord . . . the voice of the Lord, and the power of God unto salvation" (D&C 68:4). In essence, John's words are "the words of Christ" (2 Nephi 33:10).

 

What is true about John's testimony in general specifically applies to the portrayal of events surrounding the Bread of Life discourse—most of John 6. The sequence of other events in Jesus' life covered in this chapter is essentially the same as the sequence used in the synoptic Gospels (Matthew 14:13-33; Mark 6:31-52; Luke 9:10-17). John, however, approaches the events differently. Instead, he focuses on the pattern of events as a testimony of Jesus Christ.

 

John's Use of Symbolism

 

John is often cited for his extensive use of symbolism. "Virtually all agree," says C. Wilfred Griggs, "that more than one level of meaning can be found in John's writings, ranging from the obvious 'dictionary' level of meaning to symbolic realms understood only by those with spiritual insight." fn Symbolism is used in scripture for varying reasons. Elder Bruce R. McConkie suggests that symbolism is used to testify of Jesus Christ in ways that only the faithful and spiritually primed will comprehend. He indicates that one of the many ways scriptures testify of Christ is through the use of "types and shadows, figures and similitudes, their purpose ofttimes being, as it were, to hide that which is 'holy' from the 'dogs' and 'swine' of their day (Matt. 7:6), while at the same time revealing it to those whose hearts were prepared for that light and knowledge which leads to salvation." fn John's adept use of symbolism underpins his purpose for writing his testimony. John's Gospel is "the account for the saints," declares Elder McConkie. "It is pre-eminently the gospel for the Church, for those who understand the scriptures and their symbolisms and who are concerned with spiritual and eternal things." fn With a scripturally based and spiritually mature audience as his target, John could divulge his deepest emotions and declare the most profound truths in symbolism. While the prepared Saints would perceive and receive his message, those less prepared could still receive "the lesser portion of the word" (Alma 12:10). Expressed another way, John's style "was essentially gnostic, which means he wished in cryptic fashion to allude to the gospel's deep mysteries without betraying their essence to the unreceptive or as yet uninitiated." fn

 

Much of John's symbolism consists of similitudes or likenesses. fn Elder McConkie states: "To crystallize in our minds the eternal verities which we must accept and believe to be saved, to dramatize their true meaning and import with an impact never to be forgotten, to center our attention on these saving truths, again and again and again, the Lord uses similitudes. Abstract principles may easily be forgotten or their deep meaning overlooked, but visual performances and actual experiences are registered on the mind in such a way as never to be lost." fn Many of the similitudes recorded in John's testimony are anchored to historical events (the brass serpent, the manna, and so on). Others provide subtle comparisons between the everyday and the divine. Even the casual reader can readily detect recurrent themes of life, light, water, and night that permeate the book. John frequently juxtaposes metaphors, as in the case of light and darkness (John 1:4-5; 3:1-20; 9:35-38, 41). An awareness and understanding of similitudes provides us a valuable tool for digging deeper into John 6.

 

Typology

 

The symbolism of types closely relates to the concept of similitudes. Joseph Fielding McConkie expresses a concise and encompassing definition of types: "A person, event, or ritual with likeness to another person, event, or ritual of greater importance which is to followPN176,,,L,I0]The term antitype describes future fulfillment, while typology is the study of types. True types will have noticeable points of resemblance, show evidence of divine appointment, and be prophetic of future events." fn This is in harmony with the perspective that types are "divinely established models or prerepresentations of corresponding realities." fn Typology is not the same as allegory. Unlike allegory, typology is rooted in historical reality. fn Northrop Frye points out that while "allegory is normally a story-myth that finds its 'true' meaning in a conceptual or argumentative translation," typology is grounded in "real people and real events." fn Nor are typological connections between persons or events considered accidental or arbitrary. George S. Tate writes that typological correspondences "constitute a significant system of intelligible coordinates in the gradual unfolding of God's historical design." fn In other words, typology is a form of prophetic history presuppossing that history follows a divine pattern.

 

Latter-day Saints should easily grasp the concept of typology. Modern scripture declares that "all things have their likeness, and all things are created and made to bear record" of Jesus Christ (Moses 6:63). The Book of Mormon emphatically announces that "all things which have been given of God from the beginning of the world, unto man, are the typifying of him [Jesus Christ]" (2 Nephi 11:4; cf. Mosiah 3:15; 13:10, 31; Alma 13:16; 25:15; 33:19; 37:45). John's testimony follows the pattern given in the scriptures by revealing Jesus Christ as the fulfillment of types. A sensitivity to typology provides a more profound appreciation and reverence for the Bread of Life sermon and its context.

 

John and Exodus Typology

 

Many instances of typology in John's testimony relate to the Exodus story. The exodus of Israel from Egypt, the miraculous crossing of the Red Sea, the forty years of wandering through the wilderness, and the dramatic entry into the promised land through the River Jordan were such extraordinary events that they became permanently etched into the spirit of all Israel. Much of Israel's perception of history as well as the prophetic framework of understanding the future was shaped by these events. fn The Exodus, according to Hugh Nibley, "was not only a real event, but also 'a type and a shadow of things,' representing both escape from the wicked world and redemption from the bondage of sin." fn Old Testament prophets focused on the meaning of the Exodus, often through typology. For example, Isaiah clearly has the Exodus in mind as he prophesies that "the Lord shall set his hand again the second time to recover the remnant of his people." He declares that "the Lord shall utterly destroy the tongue of the Egyptian sea; and with his mighty wind shall he shake his hand over the river, and shall smite it in the seven streams, and make men go over dryshod." Isaiah used additional typology with his prophecy of "an highway for the remnant of his people, which shall be left, from Assyria; like as it was to Israel in the day that he came up out of the land of Egypt" (Isaiah 11:11, 15-16). Important themes that form the Exodus motif resonate throughout the scriptures. fn "The whole story of Moses and of the Exodus is a very dominant motif" in John's Testimony, according to Raymond E. Brown, and this typology prevails sufficiently that "some scholars have even suggested that the whole organization of the Fourth Gospel was patterned on Exodus." fn George S. Tate indicates that "it is in the Gospel of John that we encounter the most concentrated Exodus typology." fn James Plastaras supports that thesis with his statement that "the fourth Gospel presents the ministry, passion, and glorification of Jesus as the Passover mystery. There is hardly a page of this Gospel which does not contain at least one allusion to the exodus story." fn

 

John's Gospel contains an extraordinary number of Exodus images. fn Several examples reveal John's obvious consciousness of Exodus themes: The Baptist's reference to the Savior as "the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world" (John 1:29) points to the type of the Passover Lamb (Exodus 12:5; 12:21). The Savior's own attestation of himself as the "living water" establishes a connection with the provision of water for a thirsty and grumbling Israel (Exodus 17:3-7; Numbers 20:7-13; 1 Corinthians 10:4). In Numbers 21:4-9, we are told that the "Lord sent fiery serpents among the people" because of their chronic murmuring for the lack of bread and water during their travels. For the safety of his people, Moses was commanded to construct "a fiery serpent, and set it upon a pole." All who would look upon it would live. Moses did as he was commanded by fashioning a bronze serpent and placing it upon a standard. Even persons bitten by poisonous serpents received life as they "beheld the serpent." Centuries later, in a conversation with Nicodemus, Jesus bore witness that "as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up: that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life" (John 3:14-15). Repeatedly and consistently, John's record testifies that Jesus was the realization of Exodus typology.

 

The examples given above disclose both the source and the interpretive framework of John's typology. Jesus Christ was the originator as well as the fulfillment of the typology recorded in John's testimony. John heard the Savior bear witness that the scriptures "testify of me" (John 5:39). As he observed the Master teach, he realized how the scriptures testified of Jesus Christ. John heard Jesus emphatically declare himself to be Jehovah, the very God of Abraham and Moses (Exodus 3:14; John 8:58). The Beloved Disciple comprehended the implications of this truth and could announce: "The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him; and without him was not anything made which was made" (JST John 1:2-3). John knew that Jesus Christ, as the creator, the messenger of salvation, and the Redeemer, is not merely involved in our life's story; he is the life story (JST John 1:1-5; John 11:25; D&C 93:8). John's use of typology presumes, first, that though man's natural eyes cannot often comprehend it, there is a divine design in history (D&C 58:3-4); and second, that sacred events transcend their mere historical occurrence by typifying Christ and his plan of salvation.

 

John 6 and Exodus Typology

 

John 6 contains a systematically developed Exodus theme with Jesus Christ as the fulfillment of its typology. When examined from a larger perspective, this section of John's testimony clearly shadows the Exodus type. The chart below shows major parallels between the Exodus events and the sequence of John 6. In both cases, a multitude follows a prophet to a place where they are fed miraculously, a deliverance through the sea to safety is miraculously performed; doubt, murmuring, and sign-seeking are rebuked by an exhortation to learn the deeper lessons of what has occurred; and prophets subsequently testify to the reality and meaning of the events.

 

General Pattern Exodus of Israel from Egypt The New Exodus

 

Israel follows Moses out of bondage into the wilderness by the sea (Exodus 12:38; Numbers 11:4).

 

Multitude follows Jesus to the other side of the Sea of Galilee (John 6:1-2)

 

Israel is fed "bread from heaven" (Exodus 16).

 

The great company is miraculously fed from the five loaves and two fishes (John 6:5-15).

 

The power of God saves Israel from the Egyptians; they cross the Red Sea on dry ground (Exodus 14-15). Later Israel follows Joshua, crossing the River Jordan on dry ground (Joshua 3).

 

The disciples fighting the stormy sea are rescued as Jesus walks on the sea to their ship (John 6:16-21).

 

Discourse from Jehovah on the meaning and significance of the Exodus experience (Exodus 19-20).

 

Discourse on the meaning and significance of the Bread of Life (John 6:48John 6:22-65).

 

Testimony of prophets concerning the significance of the Exodus experience (Exodus 14:31; 15:1-22; Numbers 20:12; Deuteronomy 4:33, 35; Deuteronomy 6; Deuteronomy 26: 5-9; Isaiah 51, 52; 2 Nephi 25:20; 1 Nephi 17).

 

Peter's testimony that Jesus has the "words of eternal life" (John 6:66-71).

 

Truly John has caught the spiritual significance of these sacred events. Experiences in this chapter correlate with the Exodus typology, and both sets of sacred events typify salvation through Jesus Christ. In typology, the antitype need not correspond "to the type in all its properties, so as to form an almost photographic copy of it." fn John does, however, incorporate many corresponding symbols that draw attention to the motif. Some of these specific correspondences are identified as follows:

 

Specific Images and Details

 

Exodus of Ancient Israel The New Exodus

 

Moses at the "mountain of God" (Exodus 3:1, 12).

 

Jesus goes into the mountain (John 6:3, 15).

 

Jehovah multiplies signs and wonders (Exodus 7-11).

 

People follow because of signs (John 6:2, 26, 30).

 

Passover instituted by the Lord (Exodus 12).

 

Passover (John 6:4).

 

Multitude led by God through the way of the wilderness by the Red Sea (Exodus 12:38; 13:18; Numbers 11:4).

 

Multitude follows Jesus across the Sea of Galilee (John 6:1-3).

 

Manna (Exodus 16; Numbers 11; Deuteronomy 8).

 

Manna (John 6:31, 49, 58).

 

Manna compared with bread (Exodus 16:15).

 

Bread (John 6:7, 23).

 

Manna called bread from heaven (Exodus 16:3-4).

 

Bread from heaven (John 6:31-35, 41, John 6:4848, 50-51, 58).

 

Gathered according to eating (Exodus 16:16-21).

 

Gathered fragments; nothing lost (John 6:12).

 

Prophet like unto Moses (Deuteronomy 18:15-18).

 

That prophet (John 6:14).

 

Murmuring (Exodus 15:24; 16:8; 17:3).

 

Murmuring (John 6:43, 61).

 

Twelve tribes (Exodus 3:10; 28:21; Numbers 1:44; 34:18; Deuteronomy 13:1).

 

Twelve baskets; twelve disciples (John 6:12, 13).

 

Crossing the sea (Exodus 14-15; Joshua 3).

 

Crossing the sea (John 6:16-21).

 

Crossing occurred at night (Exodus 14:21).

 

Crossing at night (John 6:16).

 

Darkness emphasized (Exodus 14:20).

 

Darkness emphasized (John 6:17).

 

East wind (Exodus 14:21).

 

Great wind (John 6:18).

 

I AM (Exodus 3:14).

 

It is I (John 6:20).

 

Lord saved Israel that day (Exodus 14:30).

 

Immediately the ship reaches land (John 6:21).

 

Unveiling connections between typological events stimulates the mind and spirit, but it does not go far enough toward helping us gain scriptural understanding, for developing an analytical framework is worthless without an application. We might go beyond the simple correlations and examine the meaning of these similitudes. As previously noted, all things in the scriptures bear record of and typify Jesus Christ (Moses 6:63; 2 Nephi 11:4), and John writes his book with this same purpose (John 20:31). John quotes the Lord several times in chapter 6 declaring, "I am the bread of life." The multiplication of loaves and fishes, the crossing of the sea, and the manna discourse all reveal that Jesus Christ is our hope for salvation. Once we understand the purpose of John 6 and identify the Exodus theme, we must examine how these things testify of the Lord. We will pay particular attention to how John weaves together the events of his day with the symbols of the Exodus and the emblems of the sacrament of the Lord's Supper to typify Jesus Christ.

 

The Multitude Follows Jesus

 

The first four verses of John 6 introduce the setting for the subsequent events, as well as offer the first reflection of Exodus typology. John effectively sets this chapter apart from the preceding and subsequent chapters with the use of the phrase "after these things" in the first verse of chapter 6 and again in the beginning of chapter 7. fn John's narrative indicates that a great multitude followed Jesus across the Sea of Galilee because of the signs they saw (v. 2). Before meeting with the crowd, Jesus "went up into a mountain, and there he sat with his disciples" (v. 3). Significantly, John points out that "the passover, a feast of the Jews, was nigh" (v. 4). These references to the multitudes following the Savior, going up into the mountain, and the Passover, implicitly connect the events of chapter 6 to the ancient Exodus of Israel. Prophets had long understood the sacred meaning of these pivotal events. Moses himself taught that "the Lord brought us out of Egypt with a mighty hand: and the Lord shewed signs and wonders, great and sore, upon Egypt, upon Pharaoh, and upon all his household, before our eyes: and he brought us out from thence, that he might bring us in, to give us the land which he sware unto our fathers. And the Lord commanded us to do all these statutes, to fear the Lord our God, for our good always, that he might preserve us alive, as it is at this day" (Deuteronomy 6:21-24). Joshua also proclaimed that the real lesson to learn from the Exodus is to "fear the Lord, and serve him in sincerity and in truth" (Joshua 24:14). The multitude that followed Christ, in John's account, can be compared with the children of Israel that followed Moses. Like the earlier Israelites of the Exodus, the Judean multitude following Christ are not wholly committed to him but follow because of the signs they saw (v. 2). In both cases, the purpose for leading them into the wilderness is to teach them to trust in the Lord completely (Psalm 78:13-72).

 

The Exodus pattern may be found in similar stories of wanderers being led through a strange land, a lone and dreary world where tests and trials occur. Hugh Nibley explains: "Now the idea that this life is a pilgrimage through the desert did not originate with the Christians or even the Jews: it has been the religious memory of the human race from the earliest dispensations of the Gospel." fn Another scholar of antiquity suggests that, in the ancient view, "the desert is the world one passes through. It is nothing in itself, it is barren and inhospitable. It is not meant for people to remain in. One travels through the wilderness as one travels through time. Just like time, so does the desert lead to a new world, to the promised land." fn

 

Crossing the Sea

 

A crucial episode of John's chapter 6 narrative is the crossing of the sea. While the other Gospel writers fix this event closely to feeding the five thousand, John sets it off distinctively. It functions as a literal centerpiece, a hinge for the whole chapter. John's focus on the images of the night (v. 16), darkness (v. 17), and the wind (v. 18) emphasize the sea crossing as an Exodus reenaction.

 

John paints a stirring depiction of people in trouble. His record speaks of the darkness of the night, "and Jesus was not come to them" (v. 17). As Jesus communes with Heavenly Father from the mountain (v. 16), "He [sees] the peril and strugglings of his beloved friends as they [seek] the safety of the western shore of the Galilean lake. They [are] seabound because he had 'constrained' them so to travel. . . . His awareness of their plight must have come by the power of the Spirit rather than the natural eye." fn As their predicament worsens from "a great wind that blew" (v. 18), Jesus miraculously walks toward the boat on water. The disciples grow afraid (v. 19), but their fears subside with Jesus' simple yet profound assurance: "It is I; be not afraid" (v. 20). Unlike the synoptic writers, John focuses not on the calming of the sea nor on Peter's attempt to walk upon the sea but on safe passage through the sea and the emphasis of the divine name. " 'It is I' evokes remembrance of the passage through the sea in Exodus 14 and recalls to the reader's mind such poetic interpretations of that event as Ps 77:19, which says of Yahweh, 'Thy way was through the sea, thy path through the great waters'; and Ps 29:3, which speaks of 'the voice of the Lord . . . upon the waters.' " fn In ancient lore, crossing the great waters evokes images of traveling through time or life and traversing from old to new worlds. The story of Noah escaping the destructive floods was thought to teach more than history. Noah and his family survived because of the divinely designed ark. Ark, in Hebrew, is "teba," and according to Rabbinic tradition, it can also mean "word." fn To the ancients the lesson was quite clear: safe passage through this life depends upon the "word of God." fn Friedrich Weinreb points out, "The passage through this world is very much like passing through water, hence . . . a passage through time. And lest we should be drowned in water and in time, God gave us the 'teba', the 'word', which carries us like a ship through the water." fn Understanding such a view allows certain patterns to emerge. Weinreb notes the similar situations of "the Egyptians perishing in the waters covering them, when biblical Israel, like Noah, gets safely across. Moses also got into a 'teba' and thus was saved in the water. And the passing into the promised land, the world-to-come, with Joshua, takes place through the water that creates a safe passage, through the river 'Jordan.' " fn The disciples receiving Jesus into their ship and then landing safely compares with Moses and the Israelites crossing the Red Sea by the power of Jehovah. fn Both accounts typify Jesus Christ as the "Word" with which Israel can safely survive mortality and enter into the eternal land of promise.

 

The episode of Joshua's crossing the Jordan River into the promised land (Joshua 1-4) carries much of the same symbolism as the crossing of the Red Sea and the crossing of the Sea of Galilee. In some ways, the Joshua account amplifies the others. Joshua, whose name means "Jehovah is salvation" and translates into English from the later Aramaic and Greek as "Jesus," fn leads the children of Israel into the promised land by crossing the Jordan River on dry ground. John's subtle literary image portrays Jesus going into the mountain as did Moses; and descending again, as did Joshua, to provide his disciples safe passage to the other side.

 

The Image of Bread

 

Much of John 6 focuses on the symbolism of bread and manna. After Jesus feeds the five thousand, the multitude attempts to take him by force and make him their king, causing Jesus to depart alone to a mountain (vv. 14-15). The next day the people finally locate Jesus in Capernaum and inquire, "How camest thou hither?" (JST John 6:25). The Lord without mincing words confronts them with their real motive: "Ye seek me not because ye desire to keep my sayings, neither because ye saw the miracles but because ye did eat of the loaves and were filled" (JST v. 26). Like their ancestors in the wilderness, these people are less interested in obeying the commandments than in eating (Exodus 15:24; 16:2-3). The crowd's concern for "the loaves" may also have been motivated by their messianic expectations. A common tradition of the day anticipated that when the Messiah came, his advent would be identified with a repetition of the Exodus manna miracle. fn

 

The Lord speaks to the multitude about eternal aspects of bread instead of the temporal aspects. The people claim that Moses gave them "bread from heaven to eat" (John 6:31). Jesus corrects them, "Moses gave you not that bread from heaven; but my Father giveth you the true bread from heaven" (v. 32). Then he articulates his preeminent point: "The bread of God is he which cometh down from heaven, and giveth life unto the world" (v. 33). The manna of Moses' time is a type of the true bread given of the Father, which is none other than the Son of God. To their request for bread, Jesus unambiguously announces, "I am the bread of life: he that cometh to me shall never hunger; and he that believeth on me shall never thirst" (v. 35). The counterpart images of hunger and thirst are more than rhetorical embellishment; they draw upon the Exodus typology that joined the gift of manna and the gift of water from the rock. fn

 

The Jews murmur at that bold declaration. They claim that Jesus is no more that the son of Joseph and Mary, whom they well know (v. 42). Their murmuring likewise follows the Exodus motif. Jesus answers by proclaiming, "No man can come unto me, except he doeth the will of my Father, who hath sent me. And this is the will of him who hath sent me, that ye receive the Son; for the Father beareth record of him; And he who receiveth the testimony, and doeth the will of him who sent me, I will raise up in the resurrection of the just" (JST John 6:44). That is startling news to people committed more to temporal survival and political intrigue than to everlasting life. The Lord reminds them that their "fathers did eat manna in the wilderness, and are dead" (John 6:49) He points out the only way to continue to live: "This is the bread which cometh down from heaven, that a man may eat thereof, and not die. I am the living bread which came down from heaven: if any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever" (vv. 50-51).

 

Jesus continues his use of similitudes by adding, "Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you. Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day. For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed. He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him" (vv. 53-56). If taken literally, these words would repulse his Jewish audience. The thought of drinking human blood is altogether abhorrent (Leviticus 17:10-14; cf. Acts 15:29). Even the idea of attaining eternal life by eating human flesh is a shocking notion to his Hellenistic public. fn But clearly Jesus is not speaking literally, as the context of the discourse reveals. James E. Talmage explains, "There was little excuse for the Jews pretending to understand that our Lord meant an actual eating and drinking of His material flesh and blood. The utterances to which they objected were far more readily understood by them than they are by us on first reading; for the representation of the law and of truth in general as bread, and the acceptance thereof as a process of eating and drinking, were figures in everyday use by the rabbis of that time. Their failure to comprehend the symbolism of Christ's doctrine was an act of will, not the natural consequence of innocent ignorance." fn

 

Now in the Bread of Life discourse, the themes of Exodus manna, the unleavened bread of the Passover, the miraculous feeding of the five thousand, and the emblems of the sacrament of the Lord's Supper are woven together in a marvelous way. In each similitude, the bread is provided by God. The bread is not earned but is critical for survival. The preparation and conditions of feeding are only on the Lord's terms. These similitudes also teach how the bread of life can be consumed. Latter-day Saints readily comprehend the symbolism of partaking of "the emblems of the flesh and blood of Christ" (D&C 20:40). For this reason, the Church is commanded to "meet together often to partake of bread and wine in the remembrance of the Lord" (D&C 20:75). Elder McConkie explains, "To eat the flesh and drink the blood of the Son of God is, first, to accept him in the most literal and full sense, with no reservation whatever, as the personal offspring in the flesh of the Eternal Father; and, secondly, it is to keep the commandments of the Son by accepting his gospel, joining his Church, and enduring in obedience and righteousness unto the end." fn Those who abide these conditions receive the promise of eternal life. That is the essence of what Paul teaches, referring to those who "did all eat the same spiritual meat; and did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ" (1 Corinthians 10:3-4).

 

As Jesus finishes his sermon, many are offended by his "hard" teaching (John 6:60). He perceives their thoughts and asks, "What if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?" (v. 62). Jesus knows their spiritual blindness and tries to help them see: "It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life" (v. 63). Like the ancient Israelites, the Lord's audience thought in terms of the flesh (Exodus 16:3). Yet, the Savior's truths can only be understood by the Spirit, as Paul asserts, "For what man knoweth the things of a man, save the spirit of man which is in him? even so the things of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God" (1 Corinthians 2:11).

 

Conclusion

 

The Bread of Life discourse should be studied in the context of the entire sixth chapter of John. Through the use of similitudes, types, and shadows, John bears powerful testimony concerning the divinity of Jesus Christ and the need for mankind to depend on their Lord. The events precipitating the discourse on the bread of life are patterned after Exodus themes. Each scene presented in John 6 portrays Jesus as the way of salvation. The imagery of feeding the five thousand, the crossing of the sea, and the Bread of Life discourse all interlock to form a collage of the Savior. The Exodus pattern and the sacred events of this part of Jesus' Galilean ministry coalesce with images of the sacrament of the Lord's Supper in typifying Jesus as the central figure in sacred history. The actual sermon becomes more understandable and powerful as we see how and why Jesus fused ancient and contemporary symbols to testify of himself.

 

Footnotes

 

1. Joseph Smith, Jr., Inspired Version: The Holy Scriptures, A New Corrected Edition (Independence, Mo.: Herald Publishing House, 1971), p. 1207.

 

2. S. Kent Brown, "The Four Gospels as Testimonies," The Eleventh Annual Sidney B. Sperry Symposium, Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University, 29 Jan. 1983, p. 47.

 

3. Ibid.

 

4. C. Wilfred Griggs, "The Apostle John and Christian History," The Sixth Annual Sidney B. Sperry Symposium, Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University, 28 Jan. 1978, p. 36.

 

5. Bruce R. McConkie, The Promised Messiah: The First Coming of Christ (Salt Lake City, Utah: Deseret Book Co., 1978), pp. 43-44.

 

6. Bruce R. McConkie, Doctrinal New Testament Commentary, 3 vols. (Salt Lake City, Utah: Bookcraft, 1965), 1:65.

 

7. Thomas F. Rogers, "The Gospel of John as Literature," Brigham Young University Studies, vol. 28, no. 3 (Summer 1988): 68.

 

8. This paper uses the term similitudes according to its definition in the Oxford English Dictionary, 2d ed.: "A person or thing resembling, or having the likeness of, some other person or thing; a counterpart or equal; a similarity." Similitudes, defined in this sense, can include metaphors, similies, allegories, parables, types, and other forms of symbolism" (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 15:491).

 

9. McConkie, The Promised Messiah, p. 377.

 

10. Joseph Fielding McConkie, Gospel Symbolism (Salt Lake City, Utah: Bookcraft, 1985), p. 274.

 

11. Walther Eichrodt, "Is Typological Exegesis an Appropriate Method?" in Essays on Old Testament Hermeneutics, ed. C. Westermann (Richmond, Va.: John Knox Press, 1963), p. 225.

 

12. Ibid., p. 227.

 

13. Northrop Frye, The Great Code: The Bible and Literature (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1982), p. 84.

 

14. George S. Tate, "The Typology of the Exodus Pattern in the Book of Mormon," in Literature of Belief, ed. Neal E. Lambert (Provo, Utah: Religious Studies Center, Brigham Young University, 1981), p. 247.

 

15. Ibid., p. 248.

 

16. Hugh Nibley, An Approach to the Book of Mormon, 2d ed. (Salt Lake City, Utah: Utah: Deseret Book Co., 1976), p. 116.

 

17. S. Kent Brown, "The Exodus: Seeing It As a Test, a Testimony, and a Type," Ensign, Feb. 1990, p. 2.; Frye, The Great Code; Tate, "Typology of the Exodus Pattern," pp. 245-62.

 

18. Raymond E. Brown, The Gospel According to John (I-XII), Anchor Bible, ed. W. F. Albright and D. N. Freedman (New York: Doubleday, 1966), p. lx.

 

19. Tate, "The Typology of the Exodus Pattern," p. 256.

 

20. James Plastaras, The God of Exodus: The Theology of the Exodus Narratives (Milwaukee, Wis.: Bruce Publishing, 1966), p. 325.

 

21. J. J. Enz, "The Book of Exodus As a Literary Type for the Gospel of John," Journal of Biblical Literature, 76 (1957): 208-15. Robert Smith, "Exodus Typology in the Fourth Gospel," Journal of Biblical Literature, 81 (1962): 329-42.

 

22. Eichrodt, "Is Typological Exegesis an Appropriate Method?" p. 225.

 

23. Brown, The Gospel According to John (I-XII), pp. 235-36. Theories of rearrangement have been based upon these verses. The most common suggestion is to reverse chapters 5 and 6. At the end of chapter 4 Jesus is in Cana in Galilee. Having chapter 6 follow would fit better geographically, according to these theories. Chapter 5 could then take Jesus down to Jerusalem, which, it is postulated, would fit better with John 7:1.

 

There are several problems with the rearrangement theories. One difficulty, already alluded to, is that these theories generally go beyond what the text actually says. Another formidable objection is that there is no early manuscript or textual evidence supporting their suggested order. Additionally, most of the criticism of the current arrangement is based upon the presumption that John's purpose was to set forth a chronological narrative of events. That was probably not the case. Brown sums up the situation by stating, "No rearrangement can solve all the geographical and chronological problems in John, and to rearrange on the basis of geography and chronology is to give undue emphasis to something that does not seem to have been of major importance to the evangelist."

 

24. Nibley, An Approach to the Book of Mormon, p. 116.

 

25. Friedrich Weinreb, Roots of the Bible: An Ancient View for a New Outlook, (Braunton, Great Britain: Merlin Books, Ltd., 1986), p. 125.

 

26. Bruce R. McConkie, The Mortal Messiah: From Bethlehem to Calvary, 4 vols. (Salt Lake City, Utah: Deseret Book Co., 1980), 2:358.

 

27. Peter F. Ellis, The Genius of John (Collegeville, Minn.: Liturgical Press, 1984), pp. 110-11.

 

28. Weinreb, Roots of the Bible, p. 246.

 

29. This concept was also prevalent among the ancient Nephites. See, for example, Alma 5:3-13.

 

30. Weinreb, Roots of the Bible, p. 248.

 

31. Ibid., p. 247.

 

32. One is immediately struck, however, with the differences in the accounts. The Red Sea crossing included the whole company of Israel, but the account in John involved only the disciples of Jesus. Both accounts leave huge multitudes behind: in Exodus the Egyptians are drowned and in John 6 the multitudes are left on the shore. But the differences may suggest that in the final crossing, only true Israel will enter the promised land.

 

33. The Illustrated Bible Dictionary (Wheaton, Ill.: Tyndale House Publishers, 1980), 2:816.

 

34. McConkie, Mortal Messiah, 2:368. Raymond Brown also cites these traditions and concludes, "The expectation grew that the Messiah would come on Passover, and that the manna would begin to fall again on Passover." See Brown, Gospel According to John (I-XII), pp. 265-66.

 

35. Rudolf Schnackenburg, The Gospel According to St. John, 2 vols. (New York: Seabury Press, 1980), 2:44.

 

36. James D. G. Dunn, "John VI—A Eucharistic Discourse?" New Testament Studies 17 (1971): 330.

 

37. James E. Talmage, Jesus the Christ (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co. , 1967), p. 342.

 

38. As quoted in McConkie, Mortal Messiah, 2:379.

 

 

(Bruce A. Van Orden and Brent L. Top, eds., The Lord of the Gospels: The 1990 Sperry Symposium on the New Testament [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1991], 173.)

 

 

We keep the law of tithing to build up the kingdom not to receive blessings because we obey; Christ does not do God’s will to receive blessings from Him.

 

John 18 – John mainly focuses on the betrayal of Christ, he doesn’t discuss Gethsemane even though he was there.

 

(John 18:5.) – Christ gave his life voluntarily; no one could take it from Him. 

 

5 They answered him, Jesus of Nazareth. Jesus saith unto them, I am he. And Judas also, which betrayed him, stood with them.

 

John 7 – Christ offers living water.  When Christ returns He will bring living water and light to the entire world.  The 4 Candelabras represent the 4 corners of the world (geographic completeness)

 

John 8:1-11 – The woman taken in adultery, Christ isn’t here to condemn but to save, yet He makes it clear she must repent and sin no more.  She has been living in darkness and now comes into the light.  Christ is the judge of all.

 

John 9:6-7 – The blind man is healed by Christ, he is the light of the world.

 

 

 

John 7-9 in Light
of the Feast of Tabernacles

Bruce Satterfield
Department of Religious Education,
Brigham Young University - Idaho

[Publised in The Testimony of John the Beloved: the 1998 Sperry Symposium on the New TestamentSalt Lake City, UTDeseret Book, 1998, pp. 249-265)

One of several themes woven through the gospel of John is that Christ is the fulfilment of ancient Israel's sacred times (e.g., the Sabbath, the feasts of Passover and Tabernacles, etc). For John, these sacred times, which were an important part of New Testament Judaism, were types and shadows of Christ and his role as savior and redeemer of the world. This theme is a central aspect of John 7-9. In these chapters, John apprizes his reader of the Savior's activities during the Feast of Tabernacles, or Sukkoth, as it is known in Hebrew.

The Feast of Tabernacles was one of the three feasts commanded by the Lord that all males should annually attend (Ex. 23:17; 34:23) and what Josephus calls the "most holy and most eminent" of the three feasts of the Hebrews.(1) Understanding how Christ was the fulfilment of this most important feast is intimately connected with the feast itself. However, as is often the case in scripture, John assumes the reader is already aware of the activities associated with the Feast of Tabernacles and therefore no details of the feast are given. John only tells of the movements and sayings of Christ in connection with the feast. But as Raymond Brown has said, in order to understand what the Savior said during John 7-9 "one must have an intimate knowledge of the celebration of the Tabernacles."(2)

The focus of the following pages will be to provide that "intimate knowledge" of the Feast of Tabernacles that Brown spoke of in order to reveal how that sacred time was meant to be a type and shadow of the Savior. To arrive at this, the feast will be examined through both Biblical and Rabbinical sources. It will then be possible to examine John 7-9 in light of the Feast of Tabernacles background noting the impact of Jesus' sayings upon his listeners.

The Feast of Tabernacles background has already been the subject of scholarly discussion (mainly non-LDS). However, it is felt that many in the LDS community are not familiar with or do not have access to this essential background. Therefore, it seems appropriate that this information be made available to them.

Sources

There are two major sources available that aid our understanding of how the Feast of Tabernacles was practiced during the second temple period: (1) Biblical, (2) Rabbinical or Jewish writings. Biblical legislation regarding the feast are found in the five books of Moses (Ex. 23:14-17; 34:22,23; Leviticus 23:33-44; Numbers 29:12-40; Deuteronomy 16:13-17), and Nehemiah (8:13-18). Added to the Biblical legislation are various descriptions of the Feast of Tabernacles found in Rabbinical writings. These are important to consider because by the time of Christ there were several additional developments that had become part of the activities associated with the feast. Familiarity with these developments is essential in understanding John 7-9. Our only source for these additional activities are found in the Rabbinical writings. Chief among these writings is the legislation found in the Mishnah and Talmud.(3) Though these regulations were codified years after the destruction of the second temple and present an idealized picture of the customs associated with the Feast of Tabernacles, much of what the Rabbis have said still seems to be applicable.

Feast of Tabernacles, One of Three Temple Feasts

After the children of Israel were freed from Egyptian bondage and led by Moses to Mt. Sinai, the Lord had Moses prepare Israel to enter into a covenant with him in order to make of them "a peculiar treasure unto [the Lord] above all people" (see Exodus 19). The initial covenant Israel entered into included this command: "Three times thou shalt keep a feast unto me in the year . . . Three times in the year all thy males shall appear before the Lord GOD" (Exodus 23:14,17). The three feasts became known as the Feast of Passover, the Feast of Weeks (often called the feast of Pentecost), and the Feast of Tabernacles.

The central activities of the feasts were located in the Temple with priests in charge. This is apparent from the injunction that all "males shall appear before the Lord GOD." Though no word for temple or sanctuary is used in this command, the phrase "before the Lord" has reference to a temple or sanctuary. Regarding this, Menahem Haran states: "In general, any cultic activity to which the biblical text applies the formula 'before the Lord' can be considered an indication of the existence of a temple at the site, since this expression stems from the basic conception of the temple as a divine dwelling place and actually belongs to the temple's technical terminology."(4) That these feasts were to be held at a temple can be seen in the name given to the first sanctuary of the Israelites. What is called in the King James Version, "the Tabernacle," is in Hebrew named ohel mo'ed, meaning "tent of meeting" or "tent of feasts." Of this, Roland de Vaux wrote:

Against [the] background of daily, weekly and monthly worship, the great annual feasts stood out in relief. The general word for a 'feast' is mo'ed: the term means a fixed place or a fixed time--a rendezvous--and the desert Tent was called 'ohel mo'ed or 'The Tent of Meeting'. Thus the word came to mean a meeting or an assembly, and finally an assembly or meeting to celebrate a feast.(5)

Though the Lord commanded that all males should come to the temple during these three feasts, it appears that at least during the second temple period, often the whole family participated in the worship associated with the feasts (see Luke 2:41-50).

In light of how modern temples are used, it seems clear that these feasts were intended to be teaching experiences in which Israel would be reminded of past events and taught of future events. Further, this would be a time to renew covenants made with God. The Feast of Passover reminded Israel of their exodus from Egyptian bondage and the triumph of God over idolatry (see Exodus 12:12). It also was to remind them of the future coming of the Messiah who would free them from spiritual bondage. The Feast of Weeks or Pentecost reminded Israel of the law God gave to Israel at Mt. Sinai in the third month following their exodus from Egypt.(6) It also foreshadowed the giving of the higher law at a future time.(7) The Feast of Tabernacles recalled Israel's wandering in the wilderness for forty years and their eventual arrival into the promised land, Israel's permanent home. It also anticipated the future coming of the Messiah.
 

Feast of Tabernacle Customs

Length of the Feast

From Leviticus (23:33-44), we learn that the feast was to be held for seven days. The first day was to be a "holy convocation"; the Hebrew is mikra kodesh which means a holy summons. "It stresses the summons to an assembly where Israel, in a state of special holiness, is called to fulfil its sacred functions. Holy convocations were central aspects of each of the three great Feasts and the Day of Atonement. They were days of rest, like the sabbath, and in later times were known as sabbaths."(8) An additional "holy convocation" was to be called after the seven days were complete making the feast a total of eight days.(9) The eighth day was referred to as the "great day of the feast" (John 7:37).

Dwelling in Booths

We are also told in Leviticus that the Israelites were to build booths or small huts outside of their houses. During the seven days of the feast they were to live in the booths so that their "generations may know that I made the children of Israel to dwell in booths, when I brought them out of the land of Egypt" (Lev. 23:43). It is from these booths (the Hebrew is Sukkoth) that the Feast of Tabernacles receives its name. These booths were to remind Israel that their forefathers lived in tents during the wilderness journey and did so until they came into the promised land where they dwelt in permanent houses. Living in booths may have also reminded Israel that mortality is not the final and permanent resting place for mankind. Just as Israel was brought to a promised land for a permanent home, God's children will be brought into their final resting place only during the millennial reign of the Messiah.

The booths were generally of modest size, at least three walls and roof, and had to be outside. They could be placed in a courtyard or on the roof of a house.(10) In Nehemiah 8:16, we are told that when the Feast of Tabernacles was reinstituted after the return of the Jews from Babylonian exile, the Jews set up their booths in a number of different places: "every one upon the roof of his house, and in their courts, and in the courts of the house of God, and in the street of the water gate, and in the street of the gate of Ephraim." Rabbinical writings tell us that those traveling some distances were exempt from living in booths if they so desired (see Talmud Sukkah 26a).

Water Drawing Ceremony

A statement made by Rabbi Joshua ben Hanania in the Talmud regarding the Feast of Tabernacles states:

"The first hour was occupied with the daily morning sacrifice; from there we proceeded to prayers; from there we proceeded to the additional sacrifice, then the prayers to the additional sacrifice, then to the House of Study, then the eating and drinking, then the afternoon prayer, then the daily evening sacrifice, and after that the Rejoicing at the place of the Water-Drawing all night." (Talmud Sukkah 53a.)

In this description, the order of events of an average day during the Feast of Tabernacles is revealed, albeit incomplete, as will now be shown.

The day began with the normal daily morning burnt offering. However, during the Feast of Tabernacles a rite was added to the daily burnt offering called the water-drawing ceremony. During the preparation of the burnt offering,(11) a procession of priests with the accompaniment of flute playing and singing wended their way from the temple down to the Pool of Siloam where a priest filled a golden flask with water while a choir repeated Isa. 12:3: "with joy shall ye draw water out of the wells of salvation" (see Mishnah Sukkah 4:9; 5:1; Talmud Sukkah 48b). The Pool of Siloam was a collecting pool for the spring Gihon, the major water supply for Jerusalem. The Jews referred to water from springs or streams fit for drinking as "living water." Living water was considered the most superior form of water for ritual purification.(12)

The priests returned to the temple via the Water Gate, a gate on the south side of the wall immediately surrounding the temple within the court of Gentiles.(13) Arriving at the Water Gate a blast was made on a shofar, the Hebrew word for ram's horn. The shofar was a signaling instrument used to announce major events such as the beginning of the Sabbath, new moons, the death of a notable, or warned of approaching danger. In this case, the shofar announced the beginning of the Feast of Tabernacles which began with the water-drawing ceremony.

When the procession of priests and Levites returned from the pool of Siloam, they were met by pilgrims who had come to the Temple Mount. Each pilgrim brought with them a lulab, which consisted of a tree branch in one hand and a citron in the other (Mishnah 3:1-7). The lulab was to be waved while the morning sacrifice was being offered with the special water libation. The waving of the lulab was a Biblical injunction: "And ye shall take you on the first day the boughs of goodly trees, branches of palm trees, and the boughs of thick trees, and willows of the brook; and ye shall rejoice before the LORD your God seven days" (Leviticus 23:40).

Upon the blasting of the shofar, the group moved towards the altar of sacrifice located in the Court of the Priests which surrounded the temple. The priest with the golden flask filled with water ascended the altar and prepared to pour the libation on the morning burnt offering. While doing this, the procession that had followed the priest would circle the altar.

It appears that pilgrims joined in with the priests who were circling the altar.(14) However, this is a matter of debate. George MacRae seems to suggest that this procession was of priests alone.(16) But an incident mentioned in the Mishnah may suggest otherwise. Mishnah Sukkah 4:9 tells us that after the water was poured into the Silver Bowl, it was said to the officiating priest: "Raise thy hand!" The reason for saying this was that "on one occasion [a Sadducean priest] poured over his feet" the water (for the Sadducees did not hold to this tradition). This so outraged the pilgrims that "all the people pelted him with their citrons." This suggests that if the pilgrims were not in the procession itself they were at least close enough for them to be able to pelt the priest. The only logical places would be the court of the priests itself or perhaps in the court of the Israelites though the latter seems less likely due to its size.(17)

Whether walking around the altar or observing the procession, the following was said by the pilgrims while waving(18) their lulabs: "We beseech Thee, O Eternal, save us, we pray" (Mishnah Sukkah 3:9; see also 4:5). The priest who had charge of pouring the water then offered the water libation with a wine libation into two silver bowls on the south-west corner of the altar.

The water-drawing ceremony proceeded in this manner every day of the feast except on the seventh day when the priests (and pilgrims?) circled the altar seven times instead of just once (Mishnah Sukkah 4:5). The circumambulation of the altar seven times ended the water-drawing ritual. It was not performed on the eighth day (Mishnah Sukkah 4:1, 5),(19) though it appears that a prayer for rain was given on the eighth day (Talmud Taanith 2a-3a).

The Lighting Ceremony

According to the chronicle outlined by Rabbi Joshua ben Hanania quoted earlier, following the water-drawing ceremony there was an "additional sacrifice." According to Numbers 29:12-40, in addition to the daily morning and evening burnt offering required by the law of Moses,(20) there were additional sacrifices to be made during the Feast of Tabernacles. On the first day of the feast there was to be offered 13 young bullocks, 2 rams, 14 lambs of the first year, and one kid for a sin offering. On the second day of the feast, there was to be offered the same offerings except instead of 13 young bullocks there was only to be offered 12. On the third day the offerings were again the same with the exception of the bullocks. Only 11 were offered. This declination of bullocks continued until the seventh day when 7 bullocks were offered (the other sacrifices remaining the same). Then a change occurred on the eighth day. One bullock was offered with one ram, seven lambs and one kid for a sin offering. The account concludes with this injunction: "These things ye shall do unto the Lord in your set feast, beside your vows, and your freewill offerings, for your burnt offerings, and for your meat offerings, and for your drink offerings and for your peace offerings."

Upon the conclusion of the "additional sacrifice," the pilgrims would have opportunity to present their individual offerings, such as expressing personal devotion to God (through the burnt offering) or those associated with the cleansing of severe impurities (through the sin offering). This was a time of great rejoicing and singing including the singing of the complete Hallel or Psalms 113-118 (Mishnah Sukkah 4:8).(21) When the personal offerings were completed, the afternoon burnt offering was performed.(22)

Normally, upon the conclusion of the afternoon burnt offering, probably around sunset, the gates of the temple would be closed.(23) However on the first day of the Feast of Tabernacles the gates were left opened so that all might participate in the final rite of the day, the lighting ceremony. This occasion proved to be a most joyous and festive observance. From the Mishnah (Sukkah 5:2-3) we are told that "At the close of the first Holyday" the priests would descend from the Court of the Israelites to the Court of Women.(24) In the court four huge candelabra were placed, each "with four golden bowls at their tops and four ladders to each one." Each candelabra were fifty cubits in height. Wicks made "from the worn-out drawers and girdles of the priests" were placed in each bowl and lit. It is said that "there was no courtyard in Jerusalem that was not lit up with the light" which came from these candelabras.

The rest of the night was spent in joyous activities in the Court of Women. Mishnah Sukkah 5:4 says:

Pious men and men of good deeds used to dance before them (the candelabra) with burning torches in their hands and sang before them songs and praises. And the Levites on harps, and on lyres, and with cymbals, and with trumpets and with other instruments of music without number upon the fifteen steps leading down from the court of the Israelites to the Women's Court, corresponding to the Fifteen Songs of Ascent in the Psalms [Psalms 120-134]; upon them the Levites used to stand with musical instruments and sing hymns.

The festivities surrounding the illumination rite concluded the festival day. However, it is not clear whether or not the illumination rite was done every night, or whether the lights simply remained lit during the whole feast.

The Messianic Nature of the Feast

Both the water drawing ceremony and the lighting of the candelabra were additional aspects of the feast not found in Biblical legislation.(25) Nevertheless, they had apparently become part of the ceremonies of the feast to portray the future messianic age. We learn this from the fact that as part of the ceremonies associated with the Feast of Tabernacles, Zechariah 14, a messianic chapter, was read to all the people. Talmud Megillah 31a says: "On the first day of Tabernacles we read the section of the festivals in Leviticus, and for haftarah [a section from the prophetic books recited after the reading from the Pentateuch on Sabbaths and Holy-days], Behold a day cometh for the Lord (Zech.14)."

What is the connection between Zechariah 14 and the Feast of Tabernacles? Chapter fourteen describes the time when "the day of the Lord cometh." At a time when "all nations" have gathered against Jerusalem, the Lord will return and save his people by standing upon the Mount of Olives which shall "cleave in the midst thereof toward the east and the toward the west" providing a way to escape through the valley created. Having saved his people, the Lord insists that "every one that is left of all the nations which came against Jerusalem shall even go up from year to year to worship the King, the LORD of hosts, and to keep the feast of tabernacles" (vs. 16). Failure to keep this command would result in the rains failing (see vs.s 17-19). This is the first Biblical association of rain with the festival. But as George MacRae has said, "the fact that it was celebrated at the end of the harvest and immediately before the autumnal rainy season, we can well imagine that the petition for rain is as old as the feast itself."(26)

With the coming of the Lord, the messianic age is inaugurated. Zechariah points out two important aspects associated with the messianic age. The first is perpetual light. In Zechariah 14:6-7, describing the day when the Lord comes, it says: "And it shall come to pass in that day, that the light shall not be clear, nor dark: but it shall be one day which shall be known to the LORD, not day, nor night: but it shall come to pass, that at evening time it shall be light." The second characteristic of the messianic age is akin to rain, that of water. Zechariah says: "And it shall be in that day, that living waters shall go out from Jerusalem" (Zech. 14:8).(27) It seems safe to assume that by the reading of Zechariah 14 during the feast the application of these messianic features to the Feast of Tabernacles was commonplace among the people.

From the foregoing, it is possible to see that the two features of the messianic age described by Zechariah in chapter 14 were made an important part of the Feast of Tabernacles ceremonies. The water-drawing ceremony is the compliment of the living water flowing from Jerusalem in 14:8. The lighting of the huge candelabra is the symbolic counterpart of the continuous day found in 14:6-7.

Zechariah 14 gives us further insight into the meaning of the lighting ceremony. When the Messiah comes, inaugurating the messianic age, he will be the light of all the world, not just the Jews. This is perhaps why four candelabra were used in the lighting ceremony. Four is often a symbolic number representing geographical completeness. This is because their are four corners of the world. Thus, the lighting of the four candelabra would have symbolized that light would be given to all the world through the coming Messiah. This would have been emphasized further by the fact that each candelabra had four bowls.(28)
 

 

JESUS AND THE FEAST OF TABERNACLES

Jesus and the Living Waters

It is in this setting that we find Jesus in John 7-9. We are told in John 7:14 that Jesus arrived midway through the feast.(29) His first few days at the temple were filled with confrontations concerning the authority of his teachings (John 7: 15-36). Then on "the last day, that great day of the feast," Jesus "stood" and issued this challenge: "If any man thirst, let him come unto me, and drink. He that believeth on me, as the scripture hath said, out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water" (John 7:37-38). Then John added, "But this spake he of the Spirit, which they that believe on him should receive" (John 7:39). That is, the Holy Ghost which is given to those who come unto Christ brings life to their souls.

The impact of this challenge is lost unless one understands the water-drawing ceremony of the Feast of Tabernacles as described in these pages. Having daily drawn water from the Pool of Siloam, then pouring it on the morning offering while shouting, "Save us Lord," the absence of the water-drawing ceremony on the eighth day would have been profound. Hence, on the day when living water was not drawn from the spring, and only a prayer for rain was offered--a day that perhaps symbolized Israel's dependence upon God for water that sustains life--the Savior declared that if any thirst, they should come to him for living waters. However, the water he offered was not for physical but spiritual survival. His water was the cleansing and sustaining influence of the Holy Ghost necessary for the salvation of the souls of mankind. Interestingly enough, the Jerusalem Talmud(30) states that the Jews understood the water drawing ceremony to be symbolic of the Holy Ghost: "Why is the name of it called, The drawing out of water? Because of the pouring out of the Holy Spirit, according to what is said: 'With joy shall ye draw water out of the wells of salvation.'"(31) Thus the prayers of the priests and pilgrims attending the Feast of Tabernacles had been answered . . .but not in the way they had expected!(32)

Jesus is the Light of the World

On the day following the Savior's challenge to come to him for living water, the Savior was once again at the temple teaching. While in the Court of Women,(33) the Savior declared to the multitude, "I am the light of the world: he that followeth me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life" (John 8:12). Could there be any doubt in the minds of his listeners as to what he was claiming? In the very place where the huge candelabras were lit giving light to "every courtyard in Jerusalem," symbolizing the continuous light given to all the world during the messianic age, Jesus proclaimed that he was that light.(34) Not only the light of Jerusalem, but of all the world. Even Jewish tradition held that God gives man light.(35) It is obvious that he was claiming to be the Messiah in their own hearing.

To give credence to His claim, the Savior demonstrated his power to give light to the world through a miracle that is recorded only by John. In John 9:1-7, the story of a man born blind follows on the heals of the Feast of the Tabernacles. The story begins when Jesus "saw a man which was blind from his birth." When asked why, the Savior responded "that the works of God should be made manifest in him." Then he said, "I must work the works of him that sent me, while it is day: the night cometh, when no man can work. As long as I am in the world, I am the light of the world." Upon that "he spat on the ground, and made clay of the spittle, and he anointed the eyes of the blind man with the clay, and said unto him, Go, wash in the pool of Siloam." The man did exactly what he was told. After he had washed his eyes in the same pool that the priest had drawn water as part of the water drawing ceremony of the Feast of Tabernacles, he came out seeing.

Two major symbols of the Feast of Tabernacles, water and light, were present in the miracle. By spiting onto the ground, Jesus demonstrated that indeed the living waters or the Spirit of the Holy Ghost which can give man light does indeed come from Him, for "out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water" (John 7:38). This is further emphasized by the washing of the waters in the pool of Siloam which symbolized the Holy Ghost.
 

Conclusion

It is undeniable that Jesus' statements during the Feast of Tabernacles are highlighted by the feast itself. The Savior chose a sacred time of the year when the Jews looked forward with great rejoicing through ritual action to the coming of the Messiah. Through the instrumentality of the feast, Jesus declared that he was the promised Messiah; that he was the literal fulfillment of everything promised in the Feast of Tabernacles. It is clear from the hostile reactions of the Jews that they saw it this way, supposing that by so doing he was speaking blasphemy (John 7:30,32,44-53; 8:59).
 

References

1. The Antiquities of the Jews, 8.4.1. See also George W. MacRae, "The Meaning and Evolution of the Feast of Tabernacles," The Catholic Biblical Quarterly 22, no.3 (1960): 251.

2. Raymond E. Brown, The Gospel According to John. Anchor Bible Series Vol. 29 (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1983), 326.

3. During the second temple period, many Jews (including the Pharisees) followed an oral interpretation of the written law of Moses found in Exodus through Deuteronomy. This is often referred to as the "oral law." In the New Testament, the oral law is called the tradition of the elders" (Matthew 15:2; Mark 7:3,5). In the second century A. D., the oral tradition was reduced to writing and systematically organized by Rabbi Judah the Prince. It is called the Mishnah. The Mishnah is grouped into six orders, which in turn are divided into sixty-three treatises called tractates.

Over time, the Rabbis held many debates concerning the Mishnah. The records and minutes of these debates were added to the Mishnah. This compilation has become known as the Talmud. There were two different groups of Rabbis that produced a Talmud: a group in Babylon and a group in Jerusalem. The Babylonian Talmud is the most commonly used of the two Talmuds. It has been translated in several languages. The Jerusalem Talmud is not often used and is only found in Hebrew. (For a complete discussion of the history of the Mishnah and Talmud, see Isaac Unterman, The Talmud: An Analytical Guide to its History and Teachings, [New York: Bloch, 1952].)

In this paper, all references to the Talmud refer to the Babylonian Talmud unless otherwise stated. Further, in this paper, I will follow MacRae's thinking who states: "We shall not be concerned with the dating of the Mishnah; there is no doubt that at least some of the precepts in it go back long before the final crystallization of the written form. It would be idle also to be deterred by the fact that many of the legal prescriptions are meaningless in view of the destruction of the Temple. As far as the feast is concerned, the Mishnah presents an idealized picture of the Temple ritual but also the necessary information for the proper observance of them elsewhere" ("The Meaning and Evolution of the Feast of Tabernacles," 270-271).

4. Menahem Haran, Temples and Temple Service in Ancient Israel (Winona Lake, Indiana: Eisenbrauns. 1985; Originally published: Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978), 26.

5. Roland de Vaux, Ancient Israel: Vol. 2 Religious Institutions (New York: McGraw-Hill,1965), 470.

6. Talmud Pesahim 68b states that the Feast of Weeks commemorated "the day on which the Torah was given." See also Talmud Meglillah 31a and The Book of Jubilees 1:1; 6:17-19. This is not only the view of ancient Judaism, but modern Jewry as well. Writing of this feast, Rabbi Hayim Halevy Donin states: "Shavuot [Heb. for feast of Weeks] commemorates the awesome event experienced by the children of Israel seven weeks after their exodus from Egypt when they camped at the foot of Mt. Sinai somewhere in the Sinai Peninsula. This event was the Revelation, when God's will was revealed to Israel. It marked the declaration of the Ten Commandments" (Hayim Halvey Donin, To be a Jew [New York: Basic Books, 1972], 239).

7. It should be remembered that as a result of rebellion, the law Israel ultimately received at Mt. Sinai was the law of Moses, which was only preparatory for the higher law that would be given later. The law of Moses functioned through the authority of the lesser or Aaronic Priesthood. The higher law promised would function under the authority of the higher or Melchizedek Priesthood. It would include the ordinances associated with that priesthood, the first of which is the laying on of hands for the gift of the Holy Ghost. The reception of the gift of the Holy Ghost was given on the Day of Pentecost (Acts 1-2), an appropriate time to demonstrate that the higher law had been given by God to Israel.

8. J. C. Rylaarsdam, "Convocation, Holy," in Interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible, 4 Vols. (Nashville, Tenn.: Abingdon, 1962), 1:678-679.

9. In the Talmud the eighth day is actually considered a separate festival (see Sukkah 48a).

10. See Talmud Shabbath 154b and Louis Ginzberg, The Legends of the Jews 7 Vols. (Philadephia: The Jewish Publication Society of America, 1913), 4:405. Roofs were generally flat with a staircase ascending from the outside and were used for a variety of reasons.

11. The Mishnah describes the rite of the burnt offering as being performed in four parts with each part being determined by lot. The first lot was the clearing of the ashes from the Altar (Yoma 2:2; Tamid 1:4). The ashes were cleared from the Altar "at cockcrow or close to it, either before or after it" but during "the Festivals at the first watch" for "before cockcrow time drew near the Forecourt was already filled with Israelites" (Yoma 1:8). Josephus tells us that the temple gates which were normally kept closed until morning were opened at midnight during festivals (The Antiquities of the Jews, 18.2.2). The second lot determined "who should slaughter, who should toss blood, (and) who should remove the ashes from the Inner Altar, (and) who should clear away the ashes from the Candlestick, (and) who should take up the limbs [of the burnt offering] to the Altar-slope" (Yoma 2:3; see also Tamid 3:1). The animal could not be slaughtered before dawn, therefore, the Captain of the Temple (sagan ha kohanim) said to one, "Go forth and see if the time has arrived for slaughtering." The priest went to a high point of the temple to see if the light of morning lit up the east "as far as Hebron." If so the animal could be slaughtered (Yoma 3:1; see also Tamid 3:2-7). The third lot determined who would offer the incense upon the Inner-Altar (Yoma 2:4; Tamid 5:2-6:3). The fourth lot determined which priests would offer the burnt offering on the Altar (Yoma 2:5; Tamid 4:3). For detailed descriptions concerning the offering of the morning and evening burnt offering (the Tamid) see Shmuel Safrai, Ritual in "Temple," Encyclopedia Judaica (Jerusalem: Keter, 1971): Vol 15:974-977; Shmuel Safrai, Daily whole-offerings in "The Temple," in The Jewish People in the First Century, 2 Vols. (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1987), 2:887-890; Aaron Rothkoff, Second Temple Period in "Sacrifice," Encyclopedia Judaica (Jerusalem: Keter, 1971): Vol 14: 607-609; and Emil Schurer, A History of the Jewish People in the Age of Jesus Christ. A new version, revised and edited by Geza Vermes, Ferges Millar, and Matthew Black. 2 Vols. (Edinburg: T&T Clark, 1973), 2: 299-308.

12. According to Mishnah Mikvaoth 1:1: "There are six grades among ritual baths, in ascending order of superiority." These are (1) water in cisterns, (2) water of rain drippings, (3) mikvehs, (4) wells, (5) salty water or hot water from a spring, and (6) living water (Mikvaoth 1:1-8). Only "living water" could be used in the purification of lepers (Lev. 14:5) and the defilement caused by dead corpses (Num. 19:17).

13. The main sources for a description of the temple come from the Mishnah and Josephus. But there is discrepancy in the different accounts. According to Middoth 1:4-5 and Josephus Antiquities of the Jews 15.11.5, there are seven gates into the Court of the Priests including the Nicanor gate (which does not actually open into the Court of Priests but into the Court of the Israelites). In Middoth 2:6, Shekalim 6:3 and Josephus' The Wars of the Jews 5.5.2, eight gates are mentioned not including the Nicanor gate. Most scholars accept the smaller number placing the Water Gate as the third gate from the west on the southern side of the Court of the Priests. This would place it close to the laver (see Shmuel Safrai and Michael Avi-Yona, "Temple," Encyclopaedia Judaica, 15:962-967).

14. It is Safrai's belief that the people were involved in the procession itself. Says he:

"The people participated in all the rites of the Feast of Tabernacles and, with the exception of the water-libation which was performed by a priest or the high priest, their role in Temple rites and customs was equal to that of the priests. They surrounded the altar with palm-branches and with willow, which is, of course, the essence of the water-libation ceremonies . . . All the people participated in the procession around the altar, (from which they were barred during the rest of the year) with the palm-branch.(15)

15. Safrai, "Temple," in The Jewish People of the First Century, 2:894-895." "" -

16. George W. McCrae, "The Meaning and Evolution of the Feast of Tabernacles," 272.

17. This is the view of J. C. Rylaarsdam who describes this scene in this manner: "The water was brought up in solemn fashion with the blowing of the shofar at the city gate. The pilgrims, singing the Hallel and carrying their lulabs, witnessed the circumambulation of the altar by the priestly procession and waving their lulabs, joined in the great cry: 'Save us, we beseech thee, O LORD'" ("Booths, Feast of," in Interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible, 4 Vols. [Nashville, Tenn.: Abingdon, 1962], 1:456).

18. Mishnah Sukkah 3:9 says: "And where do they wave?--At the beginning and end of Give thanks unto the Eternal and at We beseech Thee, O Eternal, save us, we pray; this is the view of the School of Hillel. The School of Shammai says, Also at We beseech Thee, O Eternal, send us prosperity, we pray."

19. In the Talmud, there is a debate about how often the water-drawing rite was done as well as when it was performed last in the feast (see Taanith 2a-3a). However, the Mishnah, which consists of earlier Rabbinical writings, suggests that the last day the water-drawing ritual was performed was the seventh day (Sukkah 4:1; but see Rabbi Judah's comments in Sukkah 4:9). This agrees with Biblical legislation that requires the waving of the lulab, a ritual performed during the pouring of the water on the altar, for seven days (see Leviticus 23:40).

20. See Exodus 29:38-42 and Numbers 28:2-4.

21. See Safrai, Ritual in "Temple," Encylopedia Judaica, 982.

22. Mishnah Pesachim 5:1 says: "The daily burnt-offering was slaughtered at the eighth hour and a half and offered up at the ninth hour and a half." However, it is not clear whether the time on this was strictly held during the Feast of Tabernacles.

23. See Safrai, Ritual in "Temple," in Encylopedia Judaica, 15:976.

24. From Talmudic sources it appears that "the place of the Water-Drawing" is in the Court of the Women. Talmud Sukkah 53a tells of the rejoicing that took place after the lighting of the huge candelabra's which Mishnah Sukkah 5:2 says took place in the Court of Women. Yet Talmud Sukkah 53a speaks of this place as "the place of Water-Drawing." In a note on Mishnah Sukkah 5:1, Philip Backman suggests the reason for this name was because there was a "well, in the Women's Forecourt, from which the water was drawn for libation on Sukkoth" (Backman, Mishnayoth, 2:341). However, Raymond Brown says of this place: "In connection with the water ceremonies at the feast of Tabernacles, the Jerusalem Talmud (Sukkah 55a) says that the part of the temple precincts traversed during the procession with the water was called the 'Place of Drawing,' because from there 'they drew the holy spirit' (also Midrash Rabbah lxx 8 on Gen xxix 1)" (Brown, The Gospel According to John. The Anchor Bible, v. 29, 329).

25. The Rabbi's believed that these traditions were given at Mt. Sinai but only passed down orally. See Lightfoot, A Commentary on the New Testament from the Talmud and Hebraica, 3:322.

26. MacRae, "The Meaning and Evolution of the Feast of Tabernacles," 269. The association of the Feast of Tabernacles with rain is well known from Mishnaic times. The tractate Ta'anith, which deals with special fasts that are called for due to continued drought, begins with the statement: "From what time should they begin to mention the Power of Rain? R. Eliezer says, From the first Holyday day of the Festival of Tabernacles; R. Joshua says, From the last Holyday day of the Festival of Tabernacles" (1:1).

27. cf. Ps. 46:4; 65:9; Isa. 8:6; Jer. 2:13; Ezek. 47:1-12; Joel 3:18; Rev. 22:1-2. On this, Brown comments thus: "The fountain of waters that overflows from Jerusalem . . . can be interpreted against the background of abundant rain sent by God during Tabernacles" (Brown, The Gospel According to John. The Anchor Bible, v. 29, 327). Joyce Baldwin interprets this verse in this way: "The dream of an abundant water supply in Jerusalem will become fact. Instead of the spring Gihon, which supplied water that 'flowed gently' to become the Siloam brook (Isa. 8:6), and was never really adequate for the city's needs, rivers independent of seasonal rainfall would rise in Jerusalem, to flow constantly to east and west until they reached the Dead Sea and the Mediterranean" (Joyce Baldwin, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi. Vol. 24, Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries [London: Tyndale, 1972], 203).

28. Numerology is an important aspect of Jewish thought. Numbers like 3, 4, and 7 represented wholeness or completeness. Three because the number three has a beginning, a middle, and an end. Four because there are four corners of the world. Seven because the world was created in seven days. To emphasize the completeness of something, often the number was multiplied by itself: 3 x 3, 4 x 4, or 7 x 7.

29. The reason for his late arrival seems to be due to the pressure of his non-believing brothers who wished him to go to the feast simply to perform miracles. Brown sees this as a temptation faced by the Savior similar to the account in Matthew (4:1-11) and Luke (4:1-13) where the Savior is tempted to display his power by jumping from the pinnacle of the temple (see Brown, The Gospel According to John. The Anchor Bible, v. 29, 308 for complete discussion). Therefore, the Savior delays his departure to the feast so that it is clear that his reasons for being there are not to display his power.

30. See note 3.

31. Jerusalem Talmud Sukkah 55a, quoted from Morris, The Gospel According to John, 421; see also F.F. Bruce, The Gospel of John (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 1983), 182, 187 n.13; John Lightfoot, A Commentary on the New Testament from the Talmud and Hebraica 4 Vols. (Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson, 1979), 3:322-323.

32. The theme of Christ as the living waters permeates the gospel of John wherein is recorded several incidences that occurred during the ministry of Christ that revolve around water. For example, John records the story of the Savior offering living water to the woman of Samaria who was drawing water from a well. To her, he said: "Whosoever drinketh of this water shall thirst again: But whosoever drinketh of the water that I shall give him shall never thirst; but the water that I shall give him shall be in him a well of water springing up into everlasting life" (John 4:13-14). That Christ has the power to give this living water is demonstrated through two stories that evidence Christ's power over water: the marriage at Cana where Christ turned water turn to wine (John 2:1-11) and the Savior's walking on water (John 615-21). To dramatize the point further, John, alone, records the piercing of the Savior's side while upon the cross. In that account it is said the when the soldiers were breaking the legs of the three who were crucified, they saw that the Savior was already dead "and they brake not his legs: but one of the soldiers with a spear pierced his side, and forthwith came there out blood and water" (John 19:33-34; emphasis added). John's point is clear. The living waters do come from the Savior.

In view of this, the reader of John's gospel is stunned to discover that while on the cross the Savior cried out, "I thirst" (John 19:28), a statement only recorded by John. He to whom all must go to receive "living waters" so they may "never thirst" again (John 4:14), now thirsted! This pathetic statement reveals that while on the cross, the Savior, in bearing our sins, infirmities, fears, guilt, and remorse, had "descended below all things" that he might comprehend "all things" (D&C 88:6). Thus, he became like "the poor and needy" who "seek water, and there is none" (Isaiah 41:17). He had become like us, lost, alone, and thirsty. In this condition, the Savior gained the compassion and mercy needed to bring the living waters to those who seek it.

33. John 8:20 tells us that he was in the treasury, which is the Court of the Women.

34. J. H. Bernard sees the lighting of the candelabras as a possible background behind Jesus' saying, but offers another possible reason: "But Philo's account of the Feast of Tabernacles would furnish an equally plausible explanation. He says that this feast is held at the autumnal equinox, in order that the world (kosmos) may be full, not only by day but also by night, of the all-beautiful light (tou pagkalou photos), as at this season there is no twilight (de septen. 24) . . . The passage of Philo shows, however, that the Feast of Tabernacles suggested the idea of light to some minds" (J. H. Bernard, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to St. John, 2 Vols. The New International Critical Commentary [Edinburgh: T&T Clark,1985], 2:291).

35. See for example, Psalms 27:1, Isa. 60:19. "The later Rabbis applied the thought to the Messiah: 'Light is the Name of Messiah,' they said" (Bernard, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to St. John, 2:292).

 

 

 

 

Review John 8-11

April 19, 2007

 

 

“The 7 I Am’s”

  1. I am the Bread of Life – John 6:35,48
  2. I am the Light of the World – John 8:12, 9:5
  3. I am the Door of the Sheep (fold) – John 10:7,9
  4. I am the “Good Shephard – John 10:11
  5. I am the Resurrection and the Life – John 11:25
  6. I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life – John 14:6
  7. I am the True Vine – John 15:1,5

 

 

Purpose of the Sabbath:

 

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 77:12.) – 7th day is a day of sanctification and the focus on man’s creation.  There is a reflection back on the creation and on the exodus story.

 

12 Q. What are we to understand by the sounding of the trumpets, mentioned in the 8th chapter of Revelation?

 

A. We are to understand that as God made the world in six days, and on the seventh day he finished his work, and sanctified it, and also formed man out of the dust of the earth, even so, in the beginning of the seventh thousand years will the Lord God sanctify the earth, and complete the salvation of man, and judge all things, and shall redeem all things, except that which he hath not put into his power, when he shall have sealed all things, unto the end of all things; and the sounding of the trumpets of the seven angels are the preparing and finishing of his work, in the beginning of the seventh thousand years—the preparing of the way before the time of his coming.

 

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 59:9-15.) – Keep ourselves unspotted from the world, healing both spiritually and physically, become dedicated and consecrated to God.  We come to gain knowledge of God who we want to worship.

 

9 And that thou mayest more fully keep thyself unspotted from the world, thou shalt go to the house of prayer and offer up thy sacraments upon my holy day;

 

10 For verily this is a day appointed unto you to rest from your labors, and to pay thy devotions unto the Most High;

 

11 Nevertheless thy vows shall be offered up in righteousness on all days and at all times;

 

12 But remember that on this, the Lord's day, thou shalt offer thine oblations and thy sacraments unto the Most High, confessing thy sins unto thy brethren, and before the Lord.

 

13 And on this day thou shalt do none other thing, only let thy food be prepared with singleness of heart that thy fasting may be perfect, or, in other words, that thy joy may be full.

 

14 Verily, this is fasting and prayer, or in other words, rejoicing and prayer.

 

15 And inasmuch as ye do these things with thanksgiving, with cheerful hearts and countenances, not with much laughter, for this is sin, but with a glad heart and a cheerful countenance—

 

Worship – To understand who God is.  We devote ourselves to God and qualify ourselves for the companionship of the Holy Ghost.

 

 

 The Apostle John shows us the importance of the Holy Ghost.  The Holy Ghost gives us the ability to see and hear.

 

(John 3:2-3.) – Nicodemus comes by night, he cannot “see”, we need the Holy Ghost to “see”.

 

2 The same came to Jesus by night, and said unto him, Rabbi, we know that thou art a teacher come from God: for no man can do these miracles that thou doest, except God be with him.

 

3 Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.

 

(John 16:7-8.) – Jesus discourses on the mission of the Holy Ghost.  The Holy Ghost is necessary to help sanctify a person so they can gain intelligence.

 

7 Nevertheless I tell you the truth; It is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you.

 

8 And when he is come, he will reprove the world of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgment:

 

  (John 16:13.) – The Holy Ghost = 1. Guide you into all truth, we seek and follow, He brings truth to us but He won’t force it upon us.  2. He tells us things to come.  3. He glorifies Christ and the Father.  He is our 1st advocate, Christ is our 2nd advocate.

 

13 Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come.

 

 

John 9 – The man who was born blind (represents the Jews of that time).  In verse 4 Jesus says that He along wilth the Holy Ghost will not be available after a period of time and miracles will cease among the people.

 

(John 14:6.) – Jesus is the creator of truth, doctrine, and law, understand this to receive the Holy Ghost, He also provides clarity and enlightenment.

 

6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.

 

 

The essence of Christianity centers on the idea that salvation is in Christ. That being the case, everyone who truly embraces the Christian faith must at the same time embrace the idea that it is only in and through Christ that salvation comes. Christ himself said, "I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me" (John 14:6). Thus the doctrine of all the holy prophets has been that there is "none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved" (Acts 4:12; see also D&C 18:23; 2 Ne. 25:20;  31:21). Within the ranks of those professing to be Christians there may be differences on the requirements of salvation, but all must agree on the acceptance of Christ as the source of salvation. At issue here is not whether a line must be drawn between the believer and the nonbeliever but simply where that line should be drawn. Latter-day Saints have marked a narrow path; the Protestant world endorses a broad one. For us there is but "one Lord, one faith, one baptism" (Eph. 4:5) and thus one true Church. For Protestants the point of unity is the saving grace of Christ, beyond which is an immense doctrinal and denominational diversity. They hold it to be unchristian for us to suppose that they are not on the path of salvation while rejecting as outrageous any notion that we could possibly be on that path.

 

(Joseph Fielding McConkie, Answers: Straightforward Answers to Tough Gospel Questions [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1998], 34.)

 

(John 8:31-46.) – We are in bondage when we commit sin (vs 34).  Since we are all sinners we are not heirs but Christ is an heir because He is sinless (vs35).  There isn’t a kingdom of glory for sinners who refuse to repent.  Just because you are Abraham’s seed that does not make you free.  If you love God you will love Christ.  They are upset that He healed twice on the Sabbath, John 5 and 9. Spiritual blindness without the gift of the Holy Ghost.

 

31 Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, If ye continue in my word, then are ye my disciples indeed;

 

32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.

 

33 ¶ They answered him, We be Abraham's seed, and were never in bondage to any man: how sayest thou, Ye shall be made free?

 

34 Jesus answered them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Whosoever committeth sin is the servant of sin.

 

35 And the servant abideth not in the house for ever: but the Son abideth ever.

 

36 If the Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed.

 

37 I know that ye are Abraham's seed; but ye seek to kill me, because my word hath no place in you.

 

38 I speak that which I have seen with my Father: and ye do that which ye have seen with your father.

 

39 They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father. Jesus saith unto them, If ye were Abraham's children, ye would do the works of Abraham.

 

40 But now ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth, which I have heard of God: this did not Abraham.

 

41 Ye do the deeds of your father. Then said they to him, We be not born of fornication; we have one Father, even God.

 

42 Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent me.

 

43 Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word.

 

44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

 

45 And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not.

 

46 Which of you convinceth me of sin? And if I say the truth, why do ye not believe me?

 

Verse 46 – The leaders sin in their hearts by wanting to murder Christ and He sees it.  They say he is blaspheming, but He shows them by His words and deeds that He is the Promised Messiah.  Christ obeys the written law but rejects their oral law and they don’t like that.  Christ is trying to show them the way but they reject Him.

 

 

"The Truth Shall Make You Free"

 

31. To those Jews who were beginning to believe, Jesus said: 'If ye continue to believe and obey my words, ye shall establish yourselves as my true followers; ye shall become saints in very deed.'

 

32. Truth] See John 18:38. Ye shall know the truth] How will this knowledge of spiritual truth come? By heeding the words of Christ; by seeking to live in conformity to every word that proceedeth forth from the mouth of God, "for the word of the Lord is truth" (D. & C. 84: 44-45); by devout, personal desire; by sincere scriptural study; and by fervent personal prayer.

 

Spiritual truths are known only by revelation. "The things of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God." (1 Cor. 2:11.) "When he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth." (John 16:13.) "By the power of the Holy Ghost ye may know the truth of all things." (Moro. 10:5.)

 

Christ himself set the pattern; he progressed from grace to grace until "He received a fulness of truth, yea, even of all truth; And no man receiveth a fulness unless he keepeth his commandments. He that keepeth his commandments receiveth truth and light, until he is glorified in truth and knoweth all things." (D. & C. 93:26-28.)

 

The truth shall make you free] Free from the damning power of false doctrine; free from the bondage of appetite and lust; free from the shackles of sin; free from every evil and corrupt influence and from every restraining and curtailing power; free to go on to the unlimited freedom enjoyed in its fulness only by exalted beings.

 

33. This reply, obviously spoken by unbelievers in the multitude, can not rationally be interpreted as presenting a claim that the Jews had never been subject to temporal bondage. At that very time, they were vassals of Rome, and between that day and the time of Father Abraham, as a nation of slaves, they had bowed in toil through centuries of Egyptian bondage, and had been unrooted and carried bodily into Babylonian captivity.

 

Rather, Jesus' unbelieving respondents were saying: 'We are the chosen seed, and as such we have the truth; never have our minds been darkened by error; our fathers had the truth, and we have it. Why at this late date do you think to reveal to us the truths which will give us that spiritual freedom which we already have?'

 

Abraham's seed] John 8:37-50.

 

34-36. What masterful analogy, what infallible logic Jesus here uses. As there are restrictions and limitations in temporal matters, so there are also in the spiritual realm. Temporally speaking, only members of the family abide permanently in the house; servants come and go in their menial ministrations; they cannot abide forever in the house unless freed from their station as bondsmen; they remain outside the inner circle unless adopted as members of the family, thus being made legal heirs of all its privileges.

 

Similarly in spiritual things, only the family members, the freemen, the sons and daughters of God, shall abide forever in his kingdom; the servants, those bound by the chains of sin, shall minister in their assigned spheres; they cannot abide in the Father's house unless freed from sin through the cleansing power of the Son. To gain an inheritance in the spiritual kingdom, they must be spiritually begotten of the Father, adopted into his family as joint-heirs with the Son.

 

Thus Jesus is saying: 'You may belong to the household of Abraham now in mortality, but it may not be so always. Only those who believe in me as the Son of God shall abide in the household of faithful Abraham in the eternal worlds. If ye forsake sin, and believe in the Son, he shall make you free from spiritual bondage, and only the free shall be Abraham's seed hereafter.'

 

 

(Bruce R. McConkie, Doctrinal New Testament Commentary, 3 vols. [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1965-1973], 1: 456.)

 

 

 

 

3 Nephi 11 – The people of Nephi didn’t understand the message either yet they were open and eager to be taught, a totally different situation then what took place in Jerusalem.

 

(John 8:47.) – We need a spiritual rebirth to know God.  We start to see spiritually by coming to know God on the Sabbath, we receive the Holy Ghost (The Sacrament prayer), as we do our part in the prayer we will “always have His Spirit to be with us”

 

47 He that is of God heareth God's words: ye therefore hear them not, because ye are not of God.

 

 

Abraham was commanded to offer up Isaac in spite of the written law of the Lord, "Thou shalt not kill" (Ex. 20:13). Because Abraham hearkened to this commandment "it was accounted unto him for righteousness" (D&C 132:36). Church members today must learn to live by revelation; and while they may never be commanded to act contrary to the written law of the Lord, they must learn that faith unto salvation is to know that the course which they pursue is the will of the Lord (Lectures on Faith 3:2-5). They must receive all things by revelation and commandment of the Lord as did Abraham. As Paul taught the Galatians, "they which be of faith are blessed with faithful Abraham" (Gal. 3:9). Paul also taught the Galatians through an allegory of Abraham's two sons, Isaac and Ishmael, that those who were born after the Spirit were the children of the promise of Abraham and those who were born after the flesh were not (Gal. 3:22-31). Thus members of the Church must be born of the Spirit to become Abraham's children and receive his blessings. The concept of developing spiritual lineage rather than relying only on physical lineage was what the Savior was trying to teach the Jews (John 8:31-59).

 

As the Savior informed the apostate Jews that the children of Abraham would do the works of Abraham and as the Apostle James taught that Abraham was justified by works as well as faith (James 2:21-24), the members of the Church must keep the commandments and justify their heritage of Abraham by the works they do. Those who do the works of Abraham will be loved and blessed by God. In Nephi's words:

 

And he loveth those who will have him to be their God. Behold, he loved our fathers, and he covenanted with them, yea, even Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob; and he remembered the covenants which he had made; wherefore, he did bring them out of the land of Egypt (1 Nephi 17:40).

 

Although Abraham had great promises extended to him, he had to earn those blessings by obedience to all that the Lord commanded him. We have those same great promises extended to us, and we must earn those blessings by our obedience to all that the Lord commands us. We must do what the Lord commands, when he commands! As Abraham has become the father of the faithful, may we become the faithful children of father Abraham according to that promise.

 

 

(H. Donl Peterson and Charles D. Tate, Jr., eds., The Pearl of Great Price: Revelations from God [Provo: BYU Religious Studies Center, 1989], 168.)

 

Lifeless works is not true worship, they are good, but need to be accompanied by prayer, gospel study, and having the Holy Ghost to testify to us.  Our obedience must be more than works, more then a checklist, we serve others because we love God and we are obedient to know God better.

 

We show our conversion in our countenance and in our worship.  The Sabbath is a day set aside to worship God.  We pray, meditate, and ponder His ways, this goes along with our works.

 

 Jesus is the Lord of the Sabbath.  He deliberately knew who He would heal and on what day it would be done.  An object lesson for the people.

 

Bruce gave us an article about Mother Teresa, with all of her good works she said she did not feel close to God.

 

 

(Revelation 3:1-2.) – We live yet are dead (spiritually), if our lives become routine (checklist), then our lives are no better then those who obeyed the oral law.  We are not placing God 1st in our lives, we aren’t loving Him.

 

1 And unto the angel of the church in Sardis write; These things saith he that hath the seven Spirits of God, and the seven stars; I know thy works, that thou hast a name that thou livest, and art dead.

 

2 Be watchful, and strengthen the things which remain, that are ready to die: for I have not found thy works perfect before God.

 

 

 

JESUS IS THE CHRIST (John 7-11)

 

LAMAR E. GARRARD

 

Chapters 7 through 11 in the Gospel of John cover that period in the life of Jesus when he was, for the most part, in Judea (Jerusalem or the near vicinity), testifying to the Jewish people and their religious leaders that he was their Christ or promised Messiah. Almost everything he said or did during this period is related to the fact that he is the Christ, the Lord God, the Savior or Redeemer of this world. The Jewish nation, as a whole, rejected his claim that he was the Christ, the promised Messiah. (John 1:11; 3 Ne. 9:16.) This was especially so in the vicinity of Jerusalem, where the temple and the hierarchy of the Jewish religion were located. fn It was there that he encountered the most opposition, including threats on his life. In fact, orders had been given that he be taken prisoner, but he always managed to escape. Then, after he had finished his Judean ministry, he rode openly and triumphantly on a donkey at the head of a procession of followers into the city of Jerusalem, thus fulfilling a prophecy that he was their King and promised Messiah. fn (Matt. 21:1-11.) He was crucified five days later.

 

Before his Judean ministry, Jesus spent most of his time in Galilee, preaching the gospel and healing the sick. During this Galilean ministry, he made several journeys to Jerusalem to attend the annual Passover feasts, staying only briefly each time. The last time he was in Jerusalem for the Passover feast, he healed a cripple on the Sabbath and was criticized for breaking the Sabbath. He answered his accusers, "My Father worketh hitherto, and I work." (John 5:17.) This caused the Jewish leaders to seek to kill him because they felt "he not only had broken the sabbath, but said also that God was his Father, making himself equal with God." (John 5:18.) Thereafter, he stayed mostly in Galilee, "for he would not walk in Jewry, because the Jews sought to kill him." (John 7:1.)

 

The end of Jesus' Galilean ministry came when his half-brothers—who had not yet accepted his divine status—asked him to go to Jerusalem with them for the Feast of Tabernacles and perform great works there as he had done in Galilee. He knew that if he did as they requested, it would bring about his death prematurely, for he said: "I go not up yet unto this feast; for my time is not yet full come." (John 7:1-8.) However, he later went down privately with his apostles. The time had now come for him to leave his beloved Galilee forever (except when he would return as a resurrected being, Matt. 28:16-18) to go to Jerusalem and bear testimony of his divine status and mission. fn He knew that as a result of the testimonies, he would eventually be crucified. (Matt. 16:21; 20:17-19.) Yet this was part of God's plan to leave a final witness with the Jews that Jesus was the Christ, the promised Messiah, and at the same time provide for his great atonement. Elder Bruce R. McConkie wrote:

 

Nearly three years have passed since our Lord's baptism and the commencement of his formal ministry; in another six months he will eat his last Passover with his disciples, be crucified, and received up into eternal glory with his Father. The final hours of his ministry before his final ascension into heaven are at hand. . . .

 

Jesus was leaving Galilee forever; his great Galilean ministry was ended. In Judea and Perea his voice would yet be heard, his mighty works seen. But the course of his life was toward the cross, and he was steadfast and immovable in his determination to follow this very course, one laid out for him by his Father. He had said of himself through the mouth of Isaiah, "I set my face like a flint, and I know that I shall not be ashamed." (Isa. 50:7.) Clearly, there was to be no turning back. fn

 

The events in chapters 7 to 11 of John's Gospel, designated as the Judean ministry, took place in either Jerusalem or Bethany except for the following: (1) John 7:1-9, when he was still in Galilee preparing to journey to Jerusalem; (2) John 10:40-11:16, when he left Jerusalem and went east across the Jordan River into Perea because the Jews "sought again to take him: but he escaped out of their hand" (John 10:39); (3) John 11:54, when, after returning from Perea, he left Jerusalem again, and "walked no more openly among the Jews; but went thence unto a country near to the wilderness, into a city called Ephraim, and there continued with his disciples." After a short stay in Ephraim, he returned to Jerusalem to begin the Passion Week just six days prior to the Passover and his death.

 

When Jesus arrived in Jerusalem from Galilee, he accused the Jews of seeking to kill him because of the incident involving the healing of the cripple on the Sabbath. The people were confused because they did not at first know who he was. (John 7:19-26.) Once they knew his identity, though, "they sought to take him." (John 7:30.) During this part of his ministry, there are three references where he either avoided going to Jerusalem or left the vicinity to avoid the Jews; at least five references where they sought to take him prisoner in Jerusalem (John 7:30, 32, 44-46; 10:39; 11:57); two references where they attempted to stone him (John 8:58-59; 10:30-33); and finally, after he healed Lazarus, a reference to a plot to kill him (John 11:47-53).

 

Views Concerning Christ

 

When Jesus arrived in Jerusalem, there was no small stir concerning who he really was. Many "marvelled, saying, How knoweth this man letters, having never learned?" (John 7:15.) Others "believed on him, and said, When Christ cometh, will he do more miracles than these which this man hath done?" (John 7:31.) On the other hand, some said he had a devil when he accused them of breaking the law of Moses by seeking to kill him. (John 7:20.)

 

Many rejected Jesus as the Messiah because, according to their traditions, the coming of the Messiah would be hidden in mystery so that no one would know where he came from (see John 7:27); since Jesus' home in Nazareth was known and also his parents were known, they surmised that he could not be the promised Messiah (see Matt. 13:55; John 6:42). Still others rejected him as the Messiah because, as the seed of David, he should have come from Bethlehem rather than Galilee. At the Feast of Tabernacles, Jesus quoted certain Messianic prophecies and implied that they referred to him: "Many of the people therefore, when they heard this saying, said, Of a truth this is the Prophet. Others said, This is the Christ. But some said, Shall Christ come out of Galilee? Hath not the scripture said, That Christ cometh of the seed of David, and out of the town of Bethlehem, where David was? So there was a division among the people because of him." (John 7:40-43.) Because of their apostate condition, a tradition had arisen among some of the Jews that the prophet spoken of by Moses (Deut. 18:15-19) was different from the promised Messiah. They believed that Jesus fulfilled the role of this prophet rather than that of the Messiah or Christ.

 

As we read these accounts, it becomes readily apparent that the Jews lacked spiritual insight into and understanding of the scriptures as a result of disobedience and apostasy. (See John 8:43-45.) Their leaders, who claimed to be able to see and understand the scriptures, were actually blind as to their true meaning. They had changed the meaning of the scriptures, relying more on traditions of uninspired predecessors. fn By contrast, many of the common people, humble persons who were considered spiritually blind by their leaders, were in fact able to see and understand the scriptures and Christ's role, once it was explained to them by an inspired teacher. Jesus pointed this out when he healed the blind man (who typified the common people), who was not only able to see physically but also to see spiritually once Jesus had healed him and testified to him. The Pharisees, who cast the man out of their synagogue, claimed to see spiritually but were actually spiritually blind:

 

Jesus heard that they had cast him out; and when he had found him, he said unto him, Dost thou belive on the Son of God?

 

He answered and said, Who is he, Lord, that I might believe on him?

 

And Jesus said unto him, Thou hast both seen him, and it is he that talketh with thee.

 

And he said, Lord, I believe. And he worshipped him.

 

And Jesus said, For judgment I am come into this world, that they which see not might see; and that they which see might be made blind.

 

And some of the Pharisees which were with him heard these words, and said unto him, Are we blind also?

 

Jesus said unto them, If ye were blind, ye should have no sin: but now ye say, We see; therefore your sin remaineth. (John 9:35-41.)

 

It is difficult to tell from the New Testament record exactly how much the common people understood concerning the role and mission of Christ or the Messiah. However, the fact remains that whenever they felt he was implying by his words or actions that he was divine, many became angry at him:

 

Jesus walked in the temple in Solomon's porch.

 

Then came the Jews round about him, and said unto him, How long dost thou make us to doubt? If thou be the Christ, tell us plainly.

 

Jesus answered them, I told you, and ye believed not: the works that I do in my Father's name, they bear witness of me. But ye believe not. . . . I and my Father are one.

 

Then the Jews took up stones again to stone him.

 

Jesus answered them, Many good works have I shewed you from my Father; for which of those works do ye stone me?

 

The Jews answered him, saying, For a good work we stone thee not; but for blasphemy; and because that thou, being a man, makest thyself God. (John 10:23-25, 30-33.)

 

The Roles of the Messiah

 

With only the New Testament record—which is often incomplete—it is sometimes difficult for us to understand just what Jesus was saying regarding his role as the Christ or Messiah. With the aid of modern scripture and prophets, however, we can gain a better understanding of the Messiah's role. (See 1 Ne. 13:34-41.) Modern scripture indicates that his role is twofold: he is the Lord God of this world, and he is the Savior and Redeemer of this world. He told John and Peter Whitmer that he was their Lord and their Redeemer. (See D&C 15:1;D&C 16:1.) Sometimes he identified himself to Joseph Smith and others as their Lord or God (see D&C 5:2; 18:33), and at other times as their Savior or Redeemer (see D&C 29:1; 43:34). Furthermore, the role of the Christ seems to be divided into two parts: Alma emphasized that Christ must be a God of justice (the Lord God) as well as a God of mercy (Savior or Redeemer). In fact, Alma explained that the role of Christ as a God of mercy cannot be overemphasized to the point that it detracts from or nullifies his role as a God of justice; if mercy robs justice, he said, then the works of justice are destroyed and God would cease to be God. (Alma 42:15-25.)

 

It should be noted that Moses was a prototype of Christ because he fulfilled two roles that were quite similar to the roles fulfilled by Christ: both were to be rulers, lawgivers, and judges, and both were to be deliverers and saviors to Israel. Moses prophesied to Israel that God would raise up a prophet "like unto me; unto him ye shall hearken." (Deut. 18:15.)

 

Lehi emphasized this dual role associated with the Christ by telling us that "the law which the Holy One hath given" has a punishment affixed if we do not obey it. (2 Ne. 2:10.) He also stated that this same Holy One "offereth himself a sacrifice for sin, to answer the ends of the law, unto all those who have a broken heart and a contrite spirit." (2 Ne. 2:7.) In other words, Christ as our Deliverer, Savior, or Redeemer can save us from the very laws he gave to us as our ruler or Lord and God.

 

The words Messiah (from Hebrew) and Christ (from Greek) are synonymous. fn In modern scriptures, Messiah often appears in the text where one would normally expect Christ to appear: John the Baptist bestowed the Aaronic Priesthood upon Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery in the name of the Messiah (D&C 13:1), Lehi referred to the fullness of the gospel of the Messiah (1 Ne. 15:13), and Joseph Smith prayed that scattered Israel would come to believe in the Messiah (D&C 109:67). Furthermore, in the Book of Mormon the title Messiah is used in conjunction with Christ's first role as the Lord God of the world, fn as well as in conjunction with his second role as the Savior or Redeemer of the world. fn The title Messiah appears over thirty times in the Book of Mormon in books written before Christ's birth but not once in any books written after his birth. fn This would seem to indicate that the title was used primarily in reference to the future coming of Christ. fn Furthermore, the Book of Mormon definitely identifies Jesus of Nazareth as this promised Messiah. (2 Ne. 25:19.)

 

In the original uncorrupted version of the Bible, the title Messiah appeared much more often than in our modern Bible, where it is found only four times. In the Book of Mormon the title was sometimes used to indicate the future coming of the Holy One who would save or deliver Israel from spiritual and temporal death (2 Ne. 3:5; 25:16, 18), fn whereas among the apostate Jews the term had traditionally come to mean the advent of a great national Deliverer who would save Israel from their worldly enemies. fn

 

Jesus as the Lord God

 

In order to better understand Christ's words and works in John 7 through 11, it will be helpful to review, through modern as well as ancient scriptures, the first role associated with Jesus as the Christ: as the Lord God of this world.

 

All of us were born in premortality as spirit children of God the Father (D&C 76:24; Heb. 12:9), fn Christ being the firstborn of all these spirits (D&C 93:21; Col. 1:15). Each spirit was given the opportunity to obey or disobey the words of God the Father, which came in the form of light and truth. fn (D&C 93:29-33.) As we obeyed, our spirits received more light and truth, and as we disobeyed, we damned ourselves by not receiving further light and truth and thereby came under condemnation. fn (Alma 12:9-13.) After a period of time in this premortal state, some spirits excelled above their fellow spirits because they possessed more light and truth or glory as a result of their obedience. fn (Abr. 3:22-23.) Because he was so obedient and gained so much light and truth (glory), Christ became more intelligent than all the rest of these spirits. (Abr. 3:19; John 17:5; Heb. 1:9.) He attained the status of a God and was made the ruler over all the other spirits. fn Acting under the direction of his Father, he was given the authority and power to create this earth and all things therein. (D&C 38:1-3; Heb. 1:2.) He became a Divine Monarch, or the Lord God, over this earth fn and all the spirits who were to come here.

 

Although they never attained the status that Christ attained, some of the spirits in premortality were obedient enough to be called great and noble and were chosen by Christ to be his rulers. (Abr. 3:22-23; Jer. 1:5.) Abraham was one of these great spirits. He understood Christ's eminence in premortality and the importance of his mission on earth, so he looked forward to the future coming of Christ upon the earth and rejoiced. fn The Jewish leaders, however, rejected Christ's testimony that he was the God of this world. They accused him of blasphemy for making such a statement and attempted to kill him by stoning; but since it was not yet time to die, he escaped from their midst. (See John 8:52-59.)

 

The Light of the World

 

The purpose of mortality was to prove us to see if we would continue to obey God's words and therefore obtain additional light and truth. (Abr. 3:24-26.) Mortality provides the opposition necessary for further refinement, bringing us toward a future goal of attaining a fullness of light and truth with a resurrected body. fn Lucifer and his followers in the premortal state did not have a love for truth as did most of the other spirits. "A liar from the beginning" (D&C 93:25), "a murderer from the beginning" (John 8:44), he rebelled against God and persuaded one-third of the spirits to follow after him. As a result, they became subject to spiritual death, were cast out of the presence of God down to the earth, and became the devil and his angels. (Moses 4:1-4; D&C 29:36-37.) Here they continue their war against God's plans and purposes and attempt to persuade mortals to disobey Christ. (D&C 29:28-32; Moro. 7:12.)

 

In the treasury of the temple, Jesus bore witness to the Jews of his divinely appointed status. However, the Jewish leaders rejected not only his words but also the confirming testimony sent to them by God the Father through the Spirit of God.

 

Then spake Jesus again unto them, saying, I am the light of the world: he that followeth me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life.

 

The Pharisees therefore said unto him, Thou bearest record of thyself; thy record is not true.

 

Jesus answered and said unto them, Though I bear record of myself, yet my record is true: for I know whence I came, and whither I go; but ye cannot tell whence I come, and whither I go; Ye judge after the flesh. . . .

 

I am one that bear witness of myself, and the Father that sent me beareth witness of me.

 

Then said they unto him, Where is thy Father? Jesus answered, Ye neither know me, nor my Father: if ye had known me, ye should have known my Father also.

 

These words spake Jesus in the treasury, as he taught in the temple: and no man laid hands on him; for his hour was not yet come. (John 8:12-15, 18-20.)

 

Elder McConkie pointed out: "It appears to have been our Lord's deliberate design to dramatize the great truths relative to himself by associating them with the religious and social practices then prevailing." fn He therefore chose an appropriate time during the Feast of Tabernacles to emphasize that he was the light of the world. As Elder McConkie explained:

 

And so now, apparently while the great golden lampstands in the temple were blazing forth their light as part of the festivities of the Feast of the Tabernacles, he took occasion to associate himself with the Messianic prophecies by announcing, "I am the light of the world."

 

His hearers well knew that their Messiah should stand as a light to all men; that is, they knew that he as the very source of light and truth, would stand forth as a light, an example, a dispenser of truth; they knew that his would be the mission to mark the course and light the way which all men should travel. (3 Ne. 15:9; 18:16, 24.) Messianic prophecies given to their fathers promised that he would be "a light to the Gentiles" (Isa. 49:6), a light piercing the darkness of error and unbelief (Isa. 60:1-3). Jesus' application of these prophecies to his own person was a clear proclamation of his own Messiahship. fn

 

The Good Shepherd

 

The scriptures indicate that the tendency to accept or reject Christ's voice in premortality carries over into this mortal life, for Christ has said that "whoso cometh not unto me is under the bondage of sin. And whoso receiveth not my voice is not acquainted with my voice, and is not of me." (D&C 84:51-52.) The only place we could have become acquainted with the voice of Christ, before we heard it in this mortal state, was in our premortal life. Referring to himself as the Good Shepherd, he said:

 

He that entereth in by the door is the shepherd of the sheep. To him the porter openeth; and the sheep hear his voice: and he calleth his own sheep by name, and leadeth them out. And when he putteth forth his own sheep, he goeth before them, and the sheep follow him: for they know his voice. And a stranger will they not follow, but will flee from him: for they know not the voice of strangers. . . .

 

I am the good shepherd, and know my sheep, and am known of mine. . . .

 

But ye believed not, because ye are not of my sheep, as I said unto you. My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me: And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand. My Father, which gave them me, is greater than all; and no man is able to pluck them out of my Father's hand. (John 10:2-5, 14, 26-29.)

 

This metaphor carries an even greater impression to the mind if one is acquainted with the relationship that existed between the shepherd and his sheep in ancient biblical times. One observer has noted:

 

By day and by night the shepherd is always with his sheep. . . . This was necessary on account of the exposed nature of the land, and the presence of danger from wild animals and robbers. One of the most familiar and beautiful sights of the East is that of the shepherd leading his sheep to the pasture. . . . He depends upon the sheep to follow, and they in turn expect him never to leave them. They run after him if he appears to be escaping from them, and are terrified when he is out of sight, or any stranger appears instead of him. He calls to them from time to time to let them know that he is at hand. The sheep listen and continue grazing, but if any one else tries to produce the same peculiar cries and gutteral sounds, they look around with a startled air and begin to scatter. . . .

 

As he is always with them, and so deeply interested in them, the shepherd comes to know his sheep very intimately. Many of them have pet names suggested either by the appearance or character of the particular sheep, or by some incident connected with it. . . . One day a missionary, meeting a shepherd on one of the wildest parts of the Lebanon, asked him various questions about his sheep, and among others if he counted them every night. On answering that he did not, he was asked how he knew if they were all there or not. His reply was, "Master, if you were to put a cloth over my eyes, and bring me any sheep and only let me put my hands on its face, I could tell in a moment if it was mine or not." Such is the fulness of meaning in the words of the good Shepherd, "I know mine own, and mine own know Me" (John 10:14). fn

 

Living Water

 

Those who continue to accept the promptings of the Spirit of Christ to the point where they accept and live the gospel (D&C 84:43-48) will overcome spiritual death by receiving the gift of the Holy Ghost, which is an even greater source of light and truth (2 Ne. 31:18; 32:5). fn Since they now receive light and truth through the power of the Holy Ghost, they are able to influence others, by their example and words, to accept and live the gospel and thereby also receive light and truth. fn

 

"In the last day, that great day of the feast, Jesus stood and cried, saying, If any man thirst, let him come unto me, and drink. He that believeth on me, as the scripture hath said, out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water. (But this spake he of the Spirit, which they that believe on him should receive; for the Holy Ghost was promised unto them who believe, after that Jesus was glorified.)" (JST, John 7:37-39.) Again, we see Jesus portraying himself as the Messiah or God of this world by using dramatic moments in Jewish worship at one of the annual feasts. Elder McConkie wrote:

 

In the majesty of his own eternal might, the Lord Jehovah had proclaimed to ancient Israel: "I will pour water upon him that is thirsty, and floods upon the dry ground: I will pour my spirit upon thy seed, and my blessing upon thine offspring." (Isa. 44:3.) "Ho, every one that thirsteth, come ye to the waters." (Isa. 55:1.)

 

Now the same Eternal One, tabernacled in the flesh, ministering as the Lord Jesus unto the seed and offspring of them of old, proclaimed his willingness to give the Holy Ghost to men so that floods of living water might be poured out upon them. His solemn invitation, "If any man thirst, let him come unto me, and drink," was a plain and open claim of Messiahship. In making it he identified himself as the very Jehovah who had promised drink to the thirsty through an outpouring of the Spirit. After such a pronouncement his hearers were faced with two choices: Either he was a blasphemer worthy of death, or he was in fact the God of Israel.

 

For the publicizing of such a sobering and transcendent doctrine Jesus chose one of the most solemn and dramatic moments of Jewish worship. On each of the eight days of the feast of Tabernacles, as most authorities agree, it was the custom, for the priest as part of the temple service, to take water in golden vessels from the stream of Siloam, which flowed under the temple-mountain, and pour it upon the altar. Then the words of Isaiah were sung: "With joy shall ye draw water out of the wells of salvation." (Isa. 12:3.) And it was at this very moment of religious climax that Jesus stepped forth and offered draughts of living refreshment which would satisfy the deepest spiritual cravings of the thirsty soul. fn

 

The Healing of the Blind Man

 

In addition to his verbal testimonies and use of metaphors, Christ performed miracles to testify to the Jews that he was the God of this world. (John 10:24-25.) Two great miracles were performed by him at this time in the environs of Jerusalem: the giving of sight to the man who was blind from birth (John 9:1-38) and the bringing of Lazarus back from the dead (John 11:1-45). The motive he gave for performing the first was "that the works of God should be made manifest in him" (John 9:3), and for the latter, "for the glory of God, that the Son of God might be glorified thereby" (John 11:4). Although the blind man, Lazarus, and others present benefited personally from these miracles, perhaps the primary reason Christ performed these miracles was to give irrefutable evidence to the Jews that he had divine powers, that he had control and power over the elements of this earth, and that he was indeed Christ, the Lord God of this world. fn

 

The man born blind did not ask to be healed. He received his sight only after he was noticed by Christ and then followed his instructions; later he testified that it was through Christ's power that he was healed.

 

As Jesus passed by, he saw a man which was blind from his birth. And his disciples asked him, saying, Master, who did sin, this man, or his parents, that he was born blind?

 

Jesus answered, Neither hath this man sinned, nor his parents: but that the works of God should be made manifest in him. . . .

 

When he had thus spoken, he spat on the ground, and made clay of the spittle, and he anointed the eyes of the blind man with the clay, and said unto him, Go, wash in the pool of Siloam. . . .

 

He went his way therefore, and washed, and came seeing. (John 9:1-3, 6-7.)

 

The question the disciples asked obviously referred to a sin committed in premortality. Christ's reply confirms that both he and other Jews believed in a premortality where one could disobey God. fn

 

The reality of the miracle became public because those who had known the blind man could now see that he was no more blind. (John 9:8-12.) The news soon reached the Jewish leaders, especially since the miracle was performed on the Sabbath day. They failed in their attempt to discredit it (John 19:13-25), but they did not want to admit that Jesus had divine powers. fn Hence, they tried to escape the obvious by the fallacy of ad hominem: they accused the healed man of being a sinner and cast him out of the synagogue:

 

Then said they to him again, What did he to thee? how opened he thine eyes?

 

He answered them, I have told you already, and ye did not hear: wherefore would ye hear it again? will ye also be his disciples?

 

Then they reviled him, and said, Thou art his disciple; but we are Moses' disciples. We know that God spake unto Moses: as for this fellow, we know not from whence he is.

 

The man answered and said unto them, Why herein is a marvellous thing, that ye know not from whence he is, and yet he hath opened mine eyes. Now we know that God heareth not sinners: but if any man be a worshipper of God, and doeth his will, him he heareth. Since the world began was it not heard that any man opened the eyes of one that was born blind. If this man were not of God, he could do nothing.

 

They answered and said unto him, Thou wast altogether born in sins, and dost thou teach us? And they cast him out. (John 9:26-34.)

 

Since the man did not ask to be healed, and since Christ stated that the man was born blind so that "the works of God should be manifest in him," it is obvious that the miracle was performed primarily as a witness to the Jews that Jesus was the Christ, the Lord God of this world.

 

The Raising of Lazarus

 

The bringing of Lazarus back from the dead seems to be an even greater witness of Christ's divine power over the elements. The body of Lazarus had been in the grave for four days, with the decomposition process well under way. (John 11:17.) To bring him back from the dead required not only that his spirit be brought back from the spirit world to be united again with his body, but also that the physical elements of the body be changed from a decomposed or unorganized state to their former or more organized state, thus seemingly defying laws of nature. fn

 

Jesus was in Perea when he learned that Lazarus was sick. Had he performed the miracle strictly out of compassion or love for Mary and Martha, he no doubt would have rushed to Bethany immediately. However, he apparently delayed his coming so that the incident would be more miraculous, thus demonstrating more vividly his divine powers:

 

Now a certain man was sick, named Lazarus, of Bethany, the town of Mary and her sister Martha. . . .

 

Therefore his sisters sent unto him, saying, Lord, behold, he whom thou lovest is sick.

 

When Jesus heard that, he said, This sickness is not unto death, but for the glory of God, that the Son of God might be glorified thereby.

 

Now Jesus loved Martha, and her sister, and Lazarus. When he had heard therefore that he was sick, he abode two days still in the same place where he was. Then after that saith he to his disciples, Let us go into Judaea again. (John 11:1, 3-7.)

 

Jesus used this incident to test Martha's faith. Because of her obedience to God, she was spiritually alive, having light and truth to be able to testify that Jesus was the Christ. Thus, she knew that he had the power to bring Lazarus back from the dead. She told him: "Lord, if thou hadst been here, my brother had not died. But I know, that even now, whatsoever thou wilt ask of God, God will give it thee. . . . Yea, Lord: I believe that thou art the Christ, the Son of God, which should come into the world." (John 11:21-22, 27.)

 

By the time Jesus arrived at Lazarus's tomb, a large crowd had gathered. Thus, when Lazarus came forth from the tomb, there were numerous witnesses to the great miracle, including many who had great faith; the raising of Lazarus confirmed their belief that Jesus was the Christ. (John 11:45.) However, when the news reached the ears of the chief priests and Pharisees, "they took counsel together for to put [Jesus] to death." (John 11:53.) The miracle performed two functions: it helped to confirm the faith of those who had already accepted the testimony of the Spirit of God and had believed, and it served as a further witness against those who fought against the testimony of the Spirit and hence disbelieved. (3 Ne. 29:5-7.)

 

In his role as the Lord God of this world, Christ is not only our law-giver but also our final judge as to how we have kept his law; in this respect he is a God of justice. He has stated that he "cannot look upon sin with the least degree of allowance" (D&C 1:31), and if we do not keep his laws, he must see to it that we are punished. His laws are given not only in the scriptures and through the prophets but also through the Holy Ghost. If we ask for revelation and he answers through one of these mediums, it becomes a law unto us. If we do not then obey that law, we "become transgressors; and justice and judgment are the penalty which is affixed unto [the] law." (D&C 82:4.) We will be punished by remaining spiritually dead, and eventually we will die in our sins. (2 Ne. 9:38; Moro. 10:26.)

 

Since the Jewish leaders were not seeking the truth, they did not accept Christ as their God or Lawgiver. As a result, they became and remained spiritually dead and would die in their sins:

 

Then said Jesus again unto them, I go my way, and ye shall seek me, and shall die in your sins. . . . Ye are from beneath; I am from above: ye are of this world; I am not of this world. I said therefore unto you, that ye shall die in your sins: for if ye believe not that I am he, ye shall die in your sins.

 

Then said they unto him, Who art thou? And Jesus saith unto them, Even the same that I said unto you from the beginning. (John 8:21, 23-25.)

 

Evidently these Jewish leaders loved their sins so much that they did not want to accept the truth and could not admit that they were wrong. (John 3:19-20.) They preferred to listen to the voice of the devil, who was a liar from the beginning (in premortality) and hates light and truth.

 

[Jesus said:] I know that ye are Abraham's seed; but ye seek to kill me, because my word hath no place in you. I speak that which I have seen with my Father: and ye do that which ye have seen with your father.

 

They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father.

 

Jesus saith unto them, If ye were Abraham's children, ye would do the works of Abraham. But ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth. . . . Ye do the deeds of your father. . . . Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word. Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not. . . .

 

He that is of God heareth God's words: ye therefore hear them not, because ye are not of God. (John 8:37-41, 43-45, John 8:4747.)

 

Jesus knew that the Jewish leaders would not accept him in mortality but would crucify him. (Matt. 20:17-19.) Then, after he had risen from the grave and they had risen from the grave, they would have to face him at the judgment bar. At that time they would know who he really was and would have to confess that he was the Christ, the Lord God of this world, and that they had trampled and broken his laws: fn "Then said Jesus unto them, When ye have lifted up the Son of man, then shall ye know that I am he, and that I do nothing of myself; but as my Father hath taught me, I speak these things." (John 8:28.)

 

Jesus as the Savior or Redeemer

 

The second role associated with the title Christ was that of a Savior or Redeemer. In this role, he was to redeem or save mankind from the consequences of the very laws he had given in his first role as the Lord God of this world. (2 Ne. 2:9-10.) As a result of Adam's and Eve's transgression of God's law in the Garden of Eden, they, as well as all their posterity, became subject to temporal and spiritual death. (Moses 6:48; D&C 29:41.) This meant that after temporal or mortal death, the bodies of all mankind would remain in the grave to rot and crumble, never to rise again. At the same time, all the spirits of mankind would be cast out of the presence of God, doomed to dwell forever with Satan and his angels. (2 Ne. 9:7-9.) Therefore, an atonement was needed to overcome the effects of these two everlasting deaths: to resurrect all mankind from the grave to an immortal state and to bring all back after the resurrection, into the presence of God to be judged. (2 Ne. 9:10-15.)

 

Not only was an atonement needed to overcome Adam's transgression, but it was also needed to overcome the spiritual death people bring upon themselves in this mortal life through disobedience to God's laws. Because of the power Satan gained over the physical world (including our physical bodies as well as our environment) through the Fall, it is very difficult for persons in this fallen condition to resist the temptation of Satan without the help of God. fn Consequently, all persons, after they reach the age of accountability, disobey Christ's laws at one time or another (some more than others) and become subject to spiritual death. (Alma 42:11, 14.) Although they are deprived of the presence of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost in this state of spiritual death, they can still receive the promptings of the Spirit of Christ directly or when they hear the prophets or read the scriptures here on earth. (Moro. 7:16-19; D&C 84:46.) Christ was the only person upon the earth who always obeyed his own laws as well as his Father's. Therefore, he was always spiritually alive.

 

Since it is impossible for people to relive their lives, Christ has provided a way, through the power of the Atonement, for us to become spiritually alive by going directly from spiritual death to spiritual life, providing we do the things he requires. (Alma 42:9-15.) First, he requires us to have godly sorrow for our sins and to confess that we have broken his laws. fn (D&C 58:43.) Once we have a sincere desire to change our lives to be more in conformity with God's laws, then the power of the Atonement can be used to help us resist Satan's power and overcome the tendency to disobey God. fn Once this change is made, we are then in a position to make restitution for past sins. fn After we show further obedience by being baptized, God can use the power of the Atonement to wash away our sins so that we are clean and ready to receive the Holy Ghost. (2 Ne. 31:5-17.) When we receive the Holy Ghost, we are back in the presence of God and have overcome spiritual death. As long as we continue to feast upon the words of Christ and obey him, we will never again taste of spiritual death. fn

 

In a conversation with some of the Jews who had begun to believe on him as their Lord and God, Jesus said that if they would accept his word and obey it, then as their Savior or Redeemer he could free them from the bondage of sin and help them to overcome the tendency to sin so that they could overcome spiritual death. Furthermore, as long as they continued to obey, they would never again taste of spiritual death:

 

Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, If ye continue in my word, then are ye my disciples indeed; and ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.

 

They answered him, We be Abraham's seed, and were never in bondage to any man: how sayest thou, Ye shall be made free?

 

Jesus answered them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Whosoever committeth sin is the servant of sin. . . . If the Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed. . . . If a man keep my saying, he shall never see death.

 

Then said the Jews unto him, Now we know that thou hast a devil. Abraham is dead, and the prophets; and thou sayest, If a man keep my saying, he shall never taste of death. Art thou greater than our father Abraham, which is dead? And the prophets are dead: whom makest thou thyself? (John 8:31-34, 36, 51-53.)

 

The obvious answer to their question was that Jesus was greater than Abraham or any of the other prophets. (John 8:58.) He was not just a teacher or preacher; his role as the Redeemer and Savior of the world far outshadowed his role as a teacher. fn Many have preached and could preach the gospel, but one—and only one—person could be the Savior of the world. Only one person could free others from being servants of sin and release them from spiritual death. That person was the Christ, the Savior and Redeemer of the world. fn

 

Just what did Jesus have to be and to do in order to accomplish the Atonement? The scriptures indicate that he had to be born the Son of God the Father; he had to live a sinless life; he not only had to shed his blood but also to suffer so tremendously that he sweat blood from every pore, and he had to voluntarily sacrifice his life. (D&C 45:3-4.) At the time he gave up his life on the cross he said, "It is finished" (John 19:30), indicating that the requirements of the Atonement had been met (Heb. 9:12, 25-28; 10:14). He not only had the power to lay down his life voluntarily, but now he also had the power to take it up again, thereby bringing to pass his resurrection as well as the resurrection of all mankind. (2 Ne. 2:8.)

 

In raising Lazarus from the dead, Jesus performed a miracle to help teach the Jews his role as the Great Redeemer or Savior. (See our discussion earlier in this chapter.) Even though Lazarus was not resurrected at this time but was brought back to life as a mortal, this miracle was a foreshadowing of the resurrection from the dead. Jesus tested Martha's faith in his future ability to raise all mortals from the dead in the resurrection; then he confirmed that faith by bringing Lazarus back from the dead. He also used this incident to teach Martha his ability to raise people from spiritual death to spiritual life and keep them there until they gain eternal life, if they are willing to accept him as both their Lord God and their Redeemer and to obey his will:

 

Jesus saith unto her, Thy brother shall rise again.

 

Martha saith unto him, I know that he shall rise again in the resurrection at the last day.

 

Jesus said unto her, I am the resurrection, and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live: and whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this?

 

She saith unto him, Yea, Lord: I believe that thou art the Christ, the Son of God, which should come into the world. (John 11:23-27.)

 

As odd as it may seem, God the Father even inspired Caiaphas, the high priest, to bear testimony that Jesus was the Great Redeemer who would die for his people, so that he could save them from spiritual and temporal death: "Caiaphas, being the high priest that same year, said unto them, Ye know nothing at all. Nor consider that it is expedient for us, that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation perish not. And this spake he not of himself: but being high priest that year, he prophesied that Jesus should die for that nation; and not for that nation only, but that also he should gather together in one the children of God that were scattered abroad." (John 11:49-52.)

 

Summary

 

John 7 through 11 covers a very important part of the life of Jesus of Nazareth: He knew that he would be rejected and crucified by the Jewish nation, so he came to Jerusalem to bear a final witness that he was the promised Messiah. He bore that testimony in his conversations, through parables and metaphors, through performing miraculous healings, and by associating himself with various religious practices performed at the annual feasts. It is apparent that in these five chapters of John, Jesus emphasized both of his roles as the Christ: as the Lord God of this world and as the Savior or Redeemer of the world. To accept him as the Christ in either of these roles is necessary, but not sufficient to gain salvation. To accept him as the Christ in both of these roles is both necessary and sufficient for us to be saved from our sins and eventually gain eternal life.

 

NOTES

 

LaMar E. Garrard is professor of Church history and doctrine at Brigham Young University.

 

Footnotes

 

1. The city of Jerusalem and especially the temple typified the Jewish nation. When Jesus pronounced a judgment against Jerusalem (JST, Luke 13:34-36) and the temple (Mark 13:1-2), it was a pronouncement against both the people and their nation, for "with the passing of the temple the Jews, as a distinct nation, also ceased." See Bruce R. McConkie, Doctrinal New Testament Commentary, 3 vols. (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1966-73), 1:636-37.

 

2. It was at this time that "Jesus, as though to place the capstone on all the testimony of Messiahship which he had previously borne, arranged to fulfil in detail one of the great Messianic prophecies." (McConkie, 1:577.)

 

3. Christ warned that those who would follow him and preach the same message would be persecuted and killed also. (Matt. 10:16-40.) Peter preached that Jesus was the Christ (Acts 2:22-36) as did Paul (Acts 26:1-24). Both men were persecuted and eventually killed for that testimony. The Book of Mormon and the Doctrine and Covenants bear testimony that Jesus is the Christ, and Joseph and Hyrum Smith were martyred as a result of that testimony. (D&C 136:36-39.) Modern-day elders are commanded to bear testimony of Christ (D&C 68:6) so that they will not be held accountable for the sins of their generation (D&C 88:81-88) and also so that the wicked—who do not accept that testimony—will be left without excuse when God visits them with his judgments (D&C 124:2-3, 7-10).

 

4. McConkie, 1:439.

 

5. Up until the days of John the Baptist, there had been no prophets among the Jews for approximately five hundred years. The last prophet, Malachi, had condemned the Jewish nation for tendencies toward apostasy. Uninspired scribes and Pharisees interpreted the scriptures to fit their own desires and needs, and from these false interpretations there arose false traditions that later Jewish leaders accepted as more binding than the scriptures. See James E. Talmage, Jesus the Christ (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1949), pp. 63-68.

 

6. See Talmage, pp. 35-36. The premortal Christ was anointed the Lord God and the Savior over the human family. See Ps. 45:6-7.

 

7. Abinadi referred to the coming of the Messiah: "God himself shall come down among the children of men, and redeem his people." (Mosiah 15:1.) Lehi spoke of the Messiah as the Holy One who had given the law "unto the inflicting of the punishment which is affixed." (2 Ne. 2:10.) He also referred to the Messiah in this same role, saying that "if the day shall come that they will reject the Holy One of Israel, the true Messiah, their Redeemer and their God, behold, the judgments of him that is just shall rest upon them." (2 Ne. 1:10.)

 

8. Nephi spoke of the coming of the Messiah in terms of "the redemption of the world." (1 Ne. 1:19.) Lehi referred to him in one verse as a prophet who would be raised up among the Jews, "even a Messiah, or, in other words, a Savior of the world" and in the following verse as "this Messiah . . . or this Redeemer of the world." (1 Ne. 10:4-5.) Lehi also explained that "redemption cometh in and through the Holy Messiah. . . . He offereth himself a sacrifice for sin, to answer the ends of the law, unto all those who have a broken heart and a contrite spirit." He elaborated: "No flesh . . . can dwell in the presence of God, save it be through the merits, and mercy, and grace, of the Holy Messiah, who layeth down his life according to the flesh." (2 Ne. 2:6-8.)

 

9. The last reference to the Messiah is in Helaman 8:13, which was written between 23 and 20 B.C.

 

10. 1 Nephi 1:19, 2 Nephi 25:19, Jarom 1:11, Mosiah 13:33, and Helaman 8:13 indicate how the title was used in an anticipatory sense.

 

11. The Book of Mormon also teaches that the Messiah will save Israel in the latter days from temporal or worldly enemies. (2 Ne. 6:13-14.)

 

12. Talmage, pp. 71-72.

 

13. See also Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, pp. 48, 353. This premortal state is discussed in greater detail in the following articles: LaMar E. Garrard, "What Is Man?" in Hearken, O Ye People (Sandy, Utah: Randall Book Co., 1984), pp. 133-52, and LaMar E. Garrard, "The Origin and Destiny of Man" in Studies in Scriptures, Vol. 1: The Doctrine and Covenants (Sandy, Utah: Randall Book Co., 1984), pp. 365-78.

 

14. Evidently, the voice or word of God comes to our spirits in the form of light and truth and through the power of the Spirit of God. (D&C 84:43-47.) This is sometimes referred to as testimony or promptings of the Spirit of God. (See Alma 32:28-35.)

 

15. Individual spirits can accept or reject the promptings of the Spirit of God. When they reject the Spirit, either in premortality or mortality, it is because they love their sins and do not want to change their lives. The Spirit of God prompts them to believe in God and accept his laws and change their lives to be in accordance with these laws. (John 3:16-21.)

 

16. Glory, light and truth, and intelligence are synonymous terms in this context: "The glory of God is intelligence, or, in other words, light and truth." (D&C 93:36.) Those who are more obedient to God in this mortal life go into the next life with more intelligence. (D&C 130:18-19.) For God to be just, it seems that the same would apply to a spirit coming into this mortal life.

 

17. Evidently he was chosen and anointed to this position of authority in premortality. (Ps. 45:6, 7; Heb. 1:8-12; 5:5-6; Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, pp. 181, 265.) Sometimes he is known as Jehovah. (Abr. 1:16; Ex. 6:3.)

 

18. Christ depicts himself as a Divine Monarch sitting upon his throne who rules over all things. (D&C 60:4; 88:12-13.)

 

19. Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p. 60; Hel. 8:17-18.

 

20. For more detailed information on the purpose of the Fall and the role of opposition in life, see LaMar E. Garrard, "The Fall of Man," Principles of the Gospel in Practice (Sandy, Utah: Randall Book Co., 1985), pp. 39-70.

 

21. McConkie, 1:452.

 

22. Ibid., 1:452-53.

 

23. George M. Mackie, Bible Manners and Customs (Beirut: Fleming H. Revell Co.), pp. 33-35.

 

24. When we receive the Holy Ghost, we come back into the presence of God and overcome spiritual death. (Mosiah 27:24-27; McConkie, 1:141-42, 357, 469, 532.) A more detailed discussion on spiritual death and spiritual life is given in the following articles: LaMar E. Garrard, "Spiritual Death, Temporal Death, and the Atonement of Christ," The Eleventh Annual Sidney B. Sperry Symposium: The New Testament (Provo, Utah: Religious Education, Brigham Young University, 1983), pp. 57-72, and Garrard, "The Fall of Man," pp. 43-58.

 

25. McConkie, 1:446.

 

26. Ibid., 1:445-46.

 

27. Ibid., 1:479, 531.

 

28. Ibid., 1:480.

 

29. Those who do not love the truth do not seek after truth because it would require them to change their lives to be in conformity with God's laws. Therefore, these Pharisees did not want to believe that Jesus was the God of this world, for that would require them to recognize that they were wrong, be sorry for their sins, confess them, and then forsake them. (D&C 56:14-15.)

 

30. Natural law is merely a description of the way the elements obey God's commands. Since Jesus was the Lord God of this world, he could revoke a former commandment for a new one (D&C 56:4), which appears to mortals as a miracle. Those who refuse to acknowledge that he has this power take a naturalistic view of the world that eliminates God or his power over the elements. When people take this position, they may also deny God's laws over themselves. Hence, if there is no God, or a God with no power to enact laws, there is no need to repent for breaking these laws. (Alma 42:17-21.) Such persons resist the Spirit of God, the words of the prophets, and the scriptures because they love their sins. They prefer to listen to Satan rather than God. (Alma 30:50-53.) For further discussion on this subject of natural law, see Garrard, "What Is Man?," pp. 134-39.

 

31. McConkie, 1:455. See also 2 Ne. 9:46.

 

32. For further information on this subject, see Garrard, "The Fall of Man," pp. 39-70. Because of the power Satan gained over us through the Fall, we are commanded to call upon God for help in overcoming Satan's temptations. (D&C 29:39-40; 10:5.)

 

33. There must be godly sorrow (a broken heart and contrite spirit), which is sorrow that we have offended God by breaking his laws, not just sorrow that we have offended a neighbor or that we were caught. Paul said that "godly sorrow worketh repentance to salvation not to be repented of: but the sorrow of the world worketh death." (2 Cor. 7:10.)

 

34. If we have free agency, then it is our desires that ultimately determine the choices we make (Alma 29:4-5; 2 Ne. 2:27-29), and consequently our actions or works (Alma 41:3-7).

 

35. Once we desire to change our lives and humbly call upon God for help, as he has commanded us to do (Ether 3:2), then that help comes to us as the Holy Ghost fills our spirits (2 Ne. 12:6) and enlightens them (Alma 19:6; D&C 11:13). As we are born of God, we gain the power or strength (Philip. 4:13; Col. 1:9-11) to change our carnal natures and can eventually overcome the world (Mosiah 27:25; D&C 50:34-35). Restitution cannot be completed until we cease to do those things for which we are making restitution.

 

36. The Holy Ghost will continue to guide and direct us (2 Ne. 31:19—32:3) as long as we do not turn against God and disobey him (Heb. 6:4-6).

 

37. To characterize Jesus as just a great moral teacher of ethics would be to humanize him and destroy him in his role as the Redeemer and Savior. One of the requirements necessary to be Savior of this world was that he had to be the Son of God the Father.

 

38. As the Son of God, Christ is the only one who could "not be a human sacrifice" but "an infinite and eternal sacrifice." (Alma 34:10.)

 

 

(Kent P. Jackson and Robert L. Millet, eds., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 5: The Gospels [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1986], 321.)

 

 

 

(Ezekiel 34:1-2.)

 

1 And the word of the LORD came unto me, saying,

 

2 Son of man, prophesy against the shepherds of Israel, prophesy, and say unto them, Thus saith the Lord GOD unto the shepherds; Woe be to the shepherds of Israel that do feed themselves! should not the shepherds feed the flocks?

 

Theocracy is based on 3 parts:

 

  1. Ecclesiactical

 

Priests, Levites, High Priests always stayed at the Temple.  Levites also stayed in Levitical cities, these had 2 main functions.  1.  Perform ordinances and 2.  Teach the people the Law of Moses.

 

  1. Civil Leaders

 

Local authorities, Chief Judge, Elders, Judges and officersm these offices are based on the Law of Moses, their role was to promote Jehovah worship, there wasn’t sereration of church and state.

 

  1. Prophets

 

Preachers of Righteousness, although some were false prophets who taught what the Ecclesiastical and Civil leaders wanted them to preach to the people (see Isaiah, Jeremiah)

 

These were to be the shepards of Israel, at times they had a king which came between the people and Jehovah.  These leaders for the most part did not teach the people correct doctrine on how to conduct their lives and worship Jehovah.  They led the people astray until they were all scattered, Deuteronomy 28:64-68.

 

(Deuteronomy 28:64-68.) – Jeremiah 34:18-22

 

64 And the LORD shall scatter thee among all people, from the one end of the earth even unto the other; and there thou shalt serve other gods, which neither thou nor thy fathers have known, even wood and stone.

 

65 And among these nations shalt thou find no ease, neither shall the sole of thy foot have rest: but the LORD shall give thee there a trembling heart, and failing of eyes, and sorrow of mind:

 

66 And thy life shall hang in doubt before thee; and thou shalt fear day and night, and shalt have none assurance of thy life:

 

67 In the morning thou shalt say, Would God it were even! and at even thou shalt say, Would God it were morning! for the fear of thine heart wherewith thou shalt fear, and for the sight of thine eyes which thou shalt see.

 

68 And the LORD shall bring thee into Egypt again with ships, by the way whereof I spake unto thee, Thou shalt see it no more again: and there ye shall be sold unto your enemies for bondmen and bondwomen, and no man shall buy you.

 

 

(Ezekiel 34:5-16.) – There aren’t any shepherds watching the flock, so they are scattered and wander.  Christ will seach, deliver, gather, feed, and seek for those who are lost.

 

5 And they were scattered, because there is no shepherd: and they became meat to all the beasts of the field, when they were scattered.

 

6 My sheep wandered through all the mountains, and upon every high hill: yea, my flock was scattered upon all the face of the earth, and none did search or seek after them.

 

7 ¶ Therefore, ye shepherds, hear the word of the LORD;

 

8 As I live, saith the Lord GOD, surely because my flock became a prey, and my flock became meat to every beast of the field, because there was no shepherd, neither did my shepherds search for my flock, but the shepherds fed themselves, and fed not my flock;

 

9 Therefore, O ye shepherds, hear the word of the LORD;

 

10 Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I am against the shepherds; and I will require my flock at their hand, and cause them to cease from feeding the flock; neither shall the shepherds feed themselves any more; for I will deliver my flock from their mouth, that they may not be meat for them.

 

11 ¶ For thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I, even I, will both search my sheep, and seek them out.

 

12 As a shepherd seeketh out his flock in the day that he is among his sheep that are scattered; so will I seek out my sheep, and will deliver them out of all places where they have been scattered in the cloudy and dark day.

 

13 And I will bring them out from the people, and gather them from the countries, and will bring them to their own land, and feed them upon the mountains of Israel by the rivers, and in all the inhabited places of the country.

 

14 I will feed them in a good pasture, and upon the high mountains of Israel shall their fold be: there shall they lie in a good fold, and in a fat pasture shall they feed upon the mountains of Israel.

 

15 I will feed my flock, and I will cause them to lie down, saith the Lord GOD.

 

16 I will seek that which was lost, and bring again that which was driven away, and will bind up that which was broken, and will strengthen that which was sick: but I will destroy the fat and the strong; I will feed them with judgment.

 

 

 

In Christ’s time the Pharisees aren’t feeding the flock, they don’t recognize Christ and what He has done on the Sabbath (healing), their motives are not pure.  The people are fighting against God because they don’t know Him and don’t hear His doctrine, they live without the gift of the Holy Ghost.

 

(John 10:9-18.) – Christ is the door, the good shepherd and is willing to give His life for His sheep.  No man can take His life, it is given voluntarily, as He allows it.

 

9 I am the door: by me if any man enter in, he shall be saved, and shall go in and out, and find pasture.

 

10 The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly.

 

11 I am the good shepherd: the good shepherd giveth his life for the sheep.

 

12 But he that is an hireling, and not the shepherd, whose own the sheep are not, seeth the wolf coming, and leaveth the sheep, and fleeth: and the wolf catcheth them, and scattereth the sheep.

 

13 The hireling fleeth, because he is an hireling, and careth not for the sheep.

 

14 I am the good shepherd, and know my sheep, and am known of mine.

 

15 As the Father knoweth me, even so know I the Father: and I lay down my life for the sheep.

 

16 And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd.

 

17 Therefore doth my Father love me, because I lay down my life, that I might take it again.

 

18 No man taketh it from me, but I lay it down of myself. I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again. This commandment have I received of my Father.

 

 

Christ is completely obedient to His Father, He does His works and keeps His commandments.

 

 

(John 10:22-39.)

 

22 ¶ And it was at Jerusalem the feast of the dedication, and it was winter.

 

23 And Jesus walked in the temple in Solomon's porch.

 

24 Then came the Jews round about him, and said unto him, How long dost thou make us to doubt? If thou be the Christ, tell us plainly.

 

25 Jesus answered them, I told you, and ye believed not: the works that I do in my Father's name, they bear witness of me.

 

26 But ye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep, as I said unto you.

 

27 My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me:

 

28 And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand.

 

29 My Father, which gave them me, is greater than all; and no man is able to pluck them out of my Father's hand.

 

30 I and my Father are one.

 

31 Then the Jews took up stones again to stone him.

 

32 Jesus answered them, Many good works have I shewed you from my Father; for which of those works do ye stone me?

 

33 The Jews answered him, saying, For a good work we stone thee not; but for blasphemy; and because that thou, being a man, makest thyself God.

 

34 Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, Ye are gods?

 

35 If he called them gods, unto whom the word of God came, and the scripture cannot be broken;

 

36 Say ye of him, whom the Father hath sanctified, and sent into the world, Thou blasphemest; because I said, I am the Son of God?

 

37 If I do not the works of my Father, believe me not.

 

38 But if I do, though ye believe not me, believe the works: that ye may know, and believe, that the Father is in me, and I in him.

 

39 Therefore they sought again to take him: but he escaped out of their hand,

 

 

John 11 – Christ will raise Lazarus from the dead.  The Jews believed that the spirit of a dead person will stay near the body for 3 days and leave on the 4th day.  Christ knows this and waits for the 3 days before coming to Bethany.

 

This miracle directly preceded Passion Week.  He demonstrates His power over life and death, He is the resurrection and the life.  He feels sorrow and compassion for Mary and Martha and for the people.  He loves them all and is willing to lay down His life for them and us.

 

All of these miracles happen to common people, men, women, and children, God is a God of all, not just the leaders. 

 

Rich Man – His servant is healed

Jarius – His daughter is raised from the dead

Lazarus – His father is Simon the Leper?

 

Mary Anoints Jesus at Simon's Supper

 

Matt. 26:6. House of Simon the leper] This means of identifying the place of the feast gives rise to many interesting speculations. Who was Simon? If living and present he was obviously no longer afflicted with leprosy. Was he, then, one who had been healed by Jesus? And since Martha served and Lazarus sat at the table, while Mary anointed the Master, was this also their Bethany home? Was Simon their father? The gospel authors seem to have drawn a reverent curtain over many of the details of Jesus' private life and friendships, revealing only those things needed to give proper testimony of his ministry and mission.

 

Matt. 26:7. Poured it on his head] John 12:3. Anointed the feet of Jesus] To understand this solemn scene one must both know and feel the religious significance of Mary's act. Here sat the Lord of Heaven, in the house of his friends, as the hour of his greatest trials approached, with those who loved him knowing he was soon to face betrayal and crucifixion. What act of love, of devotion, of adoration, of worship, could a mere mortal perform for him who is eternal? Could a loved one do more than David had said the Good Shepherd himself would do in conferring honor and blessing upon another, that is: "Thou anointest my head with oil"? (Ps. 23:5.)

 

"To anoint the head of a guest with ordinary oil was to do him honor; to anoint his feet also was to show unusual and signal regard; but the anointing of head and feet with spikenard, and in such abundance, was an act of reverential homage rarely rendered even to kings. Mary's act was an expression of adoration; it was the fragrant outwelling of a heart overflowing with worship and affection." (Talmage, p. 512.)

 

 

(Bruce R. McConkie, Doctrinal New Testament Commentary, 3 vols. [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1965-1973], 1: 699.)

 

 

M E R I D I A N     M A G A Z I N E

Lesson 24
"This Is Life Eternal"
John 16-17
by Bruce Satterfield, Brigham Young University - Idaho

     Of the various doctrines discussed in John 16-17, two are critical for Latter-day Saints to understand: the gift of the Holy Ghost and how to gain eternal life.  These two chapters are the conclusion of the Savior’s mortal ministry to the twelve.  The setting for these important teachings is the Last Supper. 

The Gift of the Holy Ghost

      Shortly after the supper was concluded, the Savior had warned the twelve that He would leave them (see John 14:1-3).  But rather than question where He was going, the apostles sorrowed for their loss (John 16:6).  The Savior promised that he would not leave them orphans (see John 14:18 footnote a) but would return to them again (John 14:18-23).  But in the mean time, He would send them another Comforter, even the Holy Ghost.

      In John 16, the Savior discussed the importance of the Holy Ghost in the lives of the twelve, as well as all of God’s children who receive the ordinance that initiates the gift of the Holy Ghost in their lives.  At first he chided the twelve for not asking where the Savior was going (16:5).  But then He gave them this promise: “Nevertheless I tell you the truth; It is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you” (16:7). 

      The Savior offered no explanation as to why the gift of the Holy Ghost had not been given the twelve.  Certainly they must have received the ordinance of laying on of hands!  But they had not experienced the actual reception and would not until after the Savior’s ascension to heaven (see Acts 1-2).

      The twelve had received manifestations of the Holy Ghost (see Matt. 16:13-17).  But receiving a manifestation of the Holy Ghost and receiving the gift of the Holy Ghost are two separate things.  “We need to distinguish between a manifestation of the Holy Ghost and the gift of the Holy Ghost,” said Elder Dallin H. Oaks. “As men and women desire to believe, they develop faith in God. (See Alma 32:26–43.)  When they have enough faith, they can receive a manifestation of the Holy Ghost.”  Generally a manifestation of the Holy Ghost is a witness of the truth of doctrines taught by the Lord’s emissaries (see Moroni 10:4-5).  Manifestations lead the follower to baptism and confirmation.  Citing the story of King Lamoni and his people, Elder Oaks continued, “Here we see the power and witness of the Holy Ghost poured out upon a woman and a man who had not yet been baptized.  After they and their followers were converted by this witness, they were baptized and received the gift of the Holy Ghost.  Then, as the scripture records, ‘they became a righteous people’ and ‘the Lord did begin to pour out his Spirit upon them.’ (Alma 19:35–36).” [1]

      The gift of the Holy Ghost is an important phase of the Light of Christ that is made available to all who come unto Christ through baptism.  In his masterful discourse on the Light of Christ, President Marion G. Romney taught: “There are three phases of the light of Christ that I want to mention.  The first one is the light which enlighteneth every man that cometh into the world; The second phase is the gift of the Holy Ghost; And the third is the more sure word of prophecy.” [2]   The first phase is given to all mankind.  The second and third phases are only available to those who have received certain prescribed ordinances.  The gift of the Holy Ghost is the first comforter while “the more sure word of prophecy” has reference to the second comforter of Christ himself.

      It appears that though living with the Savior during his mortal ministry, the twelve were only under the influence of the first phase of the Light of Christ.  It was essential that they progress to the second phase, or gift of the Holy Ghost.  Then they would be prepared to receive Christ back again in the third phase.

      The Savior taught the twelve, “Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come” (16:13).  Without the gift of the Holy Ghost, understanding the doctrines of the kingdom is not fully possible.

      Elder Keith B. McMullin taught: “The Holy Ghost is the third member of the Godhead, sent forth by God to reveal all needful things. He teaches and testifies with divine power and clarity. His witness may go unheard or unheeded, forsaken or denied, but it is never misunderstood. ‘The Holy Ghost is a revelator’ (Joseph Smith, Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, sel. Joseph Fielding Smith [1976], 328).  That which is received of him has a more powerful effect upon the soul than anything else received in any other way.  A millennium of experience through sight, sound, touch, taste, smell, and all the powers of the universe combined cannot approach the sublime and complete experience of one brief moment under the influence of the Holy Ghost.” [3]

      Because the twelve were without the gift of the Holy Ghost, they did not fully comprehend the Savior or His mission.  Consequently, they were not fully ready to fulfill the divine commission to take the gospel to all the world (see Acts 1:6-8).

Life Eternal is to Know God

      After the Savior concluded His teachings to the twelve, He “lifted up his eyes to heaven” and offered what has become called “the great intercessory prayer.”  He began by recognizing that “the hour is come” for Him to perform the great atoning sacrifice (17:1).  He acknowledged that the purpose of the Savior’s sacrifice was to “give eternal life” to all those who would accept the fulness of the gospel of Jesus Christ (17:2). 

      But what is eternal life?  How is it to be defined?  President Ezra Taft Benson stated: “Eternal life is the quality of life enjoyed by our Heavenly Father. Those who fully comply with His commandments believe the promise that they will have this quality of life.” [4]   Likewise, President Marion G. Romney explained: “Immortality connotes life without end.  Eternal life, on the other hand, connotes quality of life—exaltation, the highest type of immortality, the kind of life enjoyed by God himself.” [5]  

      Therefore, eternal life is the same as godhood.  President Kimball explained: “Life was to be in three segments or estates: pre‑mortal, mortal, and immortal.  The third stage would incorporate exaltation–eternal life with godhood–for those who would fully magnify their mortal lives.” [6]

      How is eternal life gained?  The answer was given in the Savior’s prayer: “And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent” (17:3).

      In the great King Follett discourse, Joseph Smith discussed the meaning of this statement: “Here, then, is eternal life–to know the only wise and true God; and you have got to learn how to be Gods yourselves, and to be kings and priests to God, the same as all Gods have done before you, namely, by going from one small degree to another, and from a small capacity to a great one; from grace to grace, from exaltation to exaltation, until you attain to the resurrection of the dead, and are able to dwell in everlasting burnings, and to sit in glory, as do those who sit enthroned in everlasting power.” [7]

      Coming to know God comes only through the atonement of Jesus Christ.  The atonement of Jesus Christ brings man at one with God in two ways.  First, it provides the means by which we are free from the eternal consequences of sin and thus we become reconciled with God.  Second, by enabling us to become like God and thus “at one” with Him. 

      Oneness with God is more than just forgiven of sins.  “To be redeemed,” Elder Russell M. Nelson explained, “is to be atoned–received in the close embrace of God with an expression not only of His forgiveness, but of our oneness of heart and mind.” [8]  

      In the great intercessory prayer, the Savior prayed for such oneness between God and all of his children who live in the world “but not of the world.”  He prayed, “Neither pray I for these [the apostles] alone, but for them also which shall believe on me through their word;  That they all may be one; as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us: that the world may believe that thou hast sent me.”  Continuing he plead, “And the glory which thou gavest me I have given them; that they may be one, even as we are one: I in them, and thou in me, that they may be made perfect in one; and that the world may know that thou hast sent me, and hast loved them, as thou hast loved me” (17:20-23).

Gift of the Holy Ghost and Oneness With God

      Combining the two main topics of John 16-17, we see that it is not possible to gain oneness with God without coming to understand the ways of God.  And one cannot understand the ways of God without the gift of the Holy Ghost. 

Notes



[1]   Dallin H. Oaks, “Spiritual Gifts,” Ensign, Sept. 1986, p. 68.

[2]   Marion G. Romney, “The Light of Christ,” Ensign, May 1977, p. 43.

[3]   Keith B. McMullin, “Ye May Know,” Ensign, May 1996, p. 9.

[4]   Ezra Taft Benson, Teachings of Ezra Taft Benson (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1988), p.26.

[5]   Marion G. Romney, “The Worth of Souls,” Ensign, Nov. 1978, p.14.

[6]   Spencer W. Kimball, The Miracle of Forgiveness (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1969), p.4‑5

[7]   Joseph Smith, Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith. (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Press, 1938), p. 346.

[8]   Russell M. Nelson, “The Atonement,” Ensign, Nov. 1996, p.34.