History before Jeremiah

 

September 14, 2006

 

 

 

Joshua’s mission from the Lord for Israel was to cleanse the land of all other people (mainly Canaanites).  Israel had a choice to follow the Lords way or the Canaanite way, but before you do so, clean up your own life, destroy the idols in our own tents! (Joshua 24)  The Canaanites were so sinful that they lost the light of Christ that was in them, like Sodom and Gomorrah.

 

 

(Joshua 24:14-26.)

 

14 ¶ Now therefore fear the LORD, and serve him in sincerity and in truth: and put away the gods which your fathers served on the other side of the flood, and in Egypt; and serve ye the LORD.

 

15 And if it seem evil unto you to serve the LORD, choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your fathers served that were on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: but as for me and my house, we will serve the LORD.

 

16 And the people answered and said, God forbid that we should forsake the LORD, to serve other gods;

 

17 For the LORD our God, he it is that brought us up and our fathers out of the land of Egypt, from the house of bondage, and which did those great signs in our sight, and preserved us in all the way wherein we went, and among all the people through whom we passed:

 

18 And the LORD drave out from before us all the people, even the Amorites which dwelt in the land: therefore will we also serve the LORD; for he is our God.

 

19 And Joshua said unto the people, Ye cannot serve the LORD: for he is an holy God; he is a jealous God; he will not forgive your transgressions nor your sins.

 

20 If ye forsake the LORD, and serve strange gods, then he will turn and do you hurt, and consume you, after that he hath done you good.

 

21 And the people said unto Joshua, Nay; but we will serve the LORD.

 

22 And Joshua said unto the people, Ye are witnesses against yourselves that ye have chosen you the LORD, to serve him. And they said, We are witnesses.

 

23 Now therefore put away, said he, the strange gods which are among you, and incline your heart unto the LORD God of Israel.

 

24 And the people said unto Joshua, The LORD our God will we serve, and his voice will we obey.

 

25 So Joshua made a covenant with the people that day, and set them a statute and an ordinance in Shechem.

 

26 ¶ And Joshua wrote these words in the book of the law of God, and took a great stone, and set it up there under an oak, that was by the sanctuary of the LORD.

 

 

The rest of the story is found in the book of Judges.  Theocratic government, no mortal king, God is the king; it didn’t go very well, the people liked the Canaanite way better.

 

 

In this section the dates are ascertained with more accuracy, help being derived from synchronisms with profane history, which become more numerous with every succeeding century.

B.C.

THE UNDIVIDED KINGDOM

PERSONS AND EVENTS OF EXTERNAL HISTORY

1095

Commencement of Saul's reign. Samuel lives for a great part of Saul's reign.

Nahash, king of Ammon. Tiglath-pilesar I, king of Assyria. Agag, king of Amalek. Achish, king of Gath

1063

David anointed by Samuel.

 

1055

David king in Hebron.

 

1047

David king in Jerusalem. Nathan and Gad, prophets.

Hiram, king of Tyre. Hadadezer, king of Zobah. Toi, king of Hamath. Hanun, son of Nahash, king of Ammon.

1015

Solomon made king. Death of David.

 

1012

Solomon begins to build the temple.

Hiram, king of Tyre

1004

Solomon begins to build his own house.

 

991

The whole buildings finished.

Hada the Edomite is protected in Egypt. Genubath, son of Hadad. Rezon, king of Zobah. Shishak, king of Egypt, shelters Jeroboam

975

Death of Solomon. The ten tribes revolt from Rehoboam.

 


In the following table the first column of dates follows the books of Kings and Chronicles; the third column contains a revised chronology derived from inscriptions on Assyrian and other monuments. The kings of Judah are printed in heavy type, and the kings of Israel in capitals.

B.C.

KINGS OF JUDAH AND ISRAEL

Rev. Chr.

INTERNAL HISTORY

EXTERNAL HISTORY

SYNCHRONISMS

975

Rehoboam Jeroboam I

953

Ahijah the Shilomite prophesies, also Shemaiah. Penuel build (1 Kgs. 12: 25).

 

Shishak, king of Egypt

 

 

949

Shishak plun- ders Jerusalem.

 

 

957

Abijam

932

 

 

 

955

Asa

929

 

 

 

954

Nadab

927

Oden and Aza- riah prophesy.

Asa's war with Zerah the Ethiopian.

 

953

Baasha

925

War of Israel against Judah. Hanani and Jehu prophesy.

 

 

930

Elah

901

 

Asa's alliance with Benhadad I.

 

929

Zimri

899

 

 

 

929

Omri (at war with Tibni)

897

 

 

 

925

Omri (victorious)

 

Benhadad I conquers Omri (1 Kgs. 20: 34).

 

 

918

Ahab

875

Samaria built (1 Kgs. 16: 24).

 

Ethbaal (Eitho- balus), king of Zidon

914

Jehoshaphat

873

Elijah the Tishbite. Jericho rebuilt. Micaiah son of Imlah prophesies.

Syrian invasion of Samaria (1 Kgs. 20: 34). Moab rebels against Israel.

Mesha, king of Moab.

898

Ahaziah

853

Jahaziel prophesies (2 Chr. 20: 14). Eliezer of Mareshah prophesies (2 Chr. 20: 27).

 

 

897

Jehoram

851

Elisha prophesies. Obadiah prophesies

Battle of Ramoth-gilead.

Hazael, king of Syria.

893

Joram

848

 

 

 

885

Ahaziah

844

 

 

 

884

Athaliah Jehu

843

 

 

 

878

Joash

837

Joash buys off Hazaels invasion (2 Kgs. 12: 18).

Syrian victories over Israel (2 Kgs. 10: 32).

Sardanapalus dies

856

Jehoahaz

 

Joel prophesies.

 

 

842

Jehoash

798

 

 

 

841

Amaziah

797

 

 

Shalmaneser II.

826

Jeroboam II

790

Hosea prophesies. Jonah prophesies (2 Kgs. 14: 25).

Amaziah subdues Edom (2 Kgs. 14: 7).

Shalmaneser III.

811

Azariah or Uzziah

792

Amos prophesies.

 

 

773

Zechariah

749

 

 

First Olympiad.

772

Shallum

748

 

 

 

772

Menahem

748

 

There is much uncertainty about the chronology of the reigns of Uzziah, Jotham, and Pekah, and from 2 Kgs. 15: 1-2, and 2 Kgs. 15: 30-32, it is clear that there is some confusion in the biblical numbers. Uzziah's name is now thought to have to have been discovered in an Assyrian inscription 740 B.C. If that prove correct, the commencement of Isaiah's prophecy cannot date before that year, and the time of Jotham's regency may have been counted as regnal years. In these tables the biblical numbers have been adhered to, as far as possible but they require further elucidation, which we may hope for as the Assyrian chronology becomes more assured.

Pul, king of Assyria (= Tiglath-pileser III?)

761

Pekahiah

 

 

 

759

Pekah

 

 

Rezin, king of Syria.

758

Jotham

740

Isaiah begins to prophesy.

Rome founded.

 

Pekahiah (R.C.)

737

 

Era of Nabonassar, 747.

 

Pekah (R.C.)

735

 

 

742

Ahaz

734

 

Tiglath-pileser II, king of Assyria (747-734). So, king of Egypt.

730

Hoshea

733

 

 

726

Hezekiah

728

 

Shalmaneser IV, king of Assyria, 727.

721

End of the Northern kingdom

722

Micah prophesies.

Sargon. Merodach- Baladan, king of Babylon, 722. Death of Sennacherib, 701. Esarhaddon. Median kingdom formed.

697

Manasseh

697

 

Psammetichus, king of Egypt, 670. Fall of No-Amon (Thebes), 660.

642

Amon

642

Nahum prophesies.

Assurbanipal (667-626).

640

Josiah

640

Huldah the prophetess. Jeremiah begins to prophesy, 628. Zephaniah prophesies.

Pharaoh-necho, king of Egypt. Nabopolassar, king of Babylon, 625-604.

609

Jehoahaz

609

Obadiah prophesies.

Fall of Ninevah, 606.

609

Jehoiakim

609

Daniel carried captive, 606.

Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon, 604-561.

598

Jehoiachin

598

Habakkuk prophesies.

 

598

Zedekiah

598

Ezekiel prophesies.

 

587

Capture of Jerusalem

587

 

 

 

 

 

The Book of Jeremiah

 

From the narrative itself we learn something about the process through which the book of Jeremiah came into existence. Many, if not all, of the words of Jeremiah that have survived were copied and collected by his friend and scribe, Baruch. In 605 B.C. Jeremiah commissioned Baruch to record his prophecies from the days of Josiah until the present on "a roll of a book" (Jer. 36:2). He then instructed the scribe to take the scroll and read it in the temple, where the words were received with a clamor that reached the king. When Jehoiakim heard about it, he ordered one of his servants to bring the scroll and read it to him and his court. Baruch was advised to escape and hide himself and Jeremiah (Jer. 36:19). As the servant read three or four columns of the scroll, Jehoiakim derisively cut them off and cast them into the fire. Such a rejection of the word of the Lord is noted, "Yet they were not afraid, nor rent their garments, neither the king, nor any of his servants that heard all these words" (Jer. 36:24). fn

 

Jeremiah then took another roll and had Baruch rewrite the words, "and there were added besides unto them many like words" (Jer. 36:32). That such a collection of Jeremiah's words was distributed, at least to some, is demonstrated by the note in 1 Nephi 5:13 that the plates of brass contained "many prophecies which have been spoken by the mouth of Jeremiah."

 

In Hebrew, the book of Jeremiah contains almost 22,000 words and is the longest book of the Prophets. fn The material collected in it appears to be rather loosely organized with attempts to arrange the material first topically and within each topic chronologically. fn Some of the prophecies are dated to a specific year in the reign of one of the kings of Judah, but it is impossible to determine the chronological order of much of the material. For our purposes, however, a general understanding of the content and structure is sufficient:

 

Jeremiah 1 through 25 Prophecies of Judgment against Judah and Jerusalem

 

A. Jeremiah 1 through 6 Time of Josiah

 

B. Jeremiah 7 through 20 Time of Jehoiakim

 

C. Jeremiah 21 through 25 Time of Zedekiah

 

Jeremiah 26 through 35 The Restoration of Israel and Judah

 

Jeremiah 36 through 45 Baruch's Biography of Jeremiah

 

Jeremiah 46 through 51 Oracles against Foreign Nations

 

Jeremiah 52 Historical Appendix: The Fall of Jerusalem, Exile, and Aftermath

 

For convenience of discussion in this and the following two chapters, I have organized the material in the book of Jeremiah into three groupings: biographical material, prophecies against Jerusalem and Judah, and prophecies against the nations and of destruction and restoration—particularly from the time of Zedekiah. The biographical material (Jer. 1, 25-29, 32-45, 52) is discussed in Chapter 20 of this volume, the prophetic material from the time of Josiah and Jehoiakim (Jer. 2-20) in Chapter 21, and the prophetic material from the time of Zedekiah, including prophecies of destruction and restoration (Jer. 21-24, 30-31) and oracles against foreign nations (Jer. 46-51), in Chapter 22.

 

We have a significant amount of biographical material concerning Jeremiah, but only a small portion of it can be examined here. Although biographical material is scattered throughout the book, some have suggested that chapters 36 through 45, because of their common theme, cohesiveness, and style, may represent Baruch's biography of the prophet he served. Certainly the location of the touching personal note to Baruch in chapter 45 would support such an observation. I will attempt to note the major historical events and correlate them with the biographical material about Jeremiah in chronological sequence as they relate to the three kings mentioned in the superscription: Josiah, Jehoiakim, Zedekiah, and the aftermath of the destruction of Jerusalem.

 

 

(Kent P. Jackson, ed., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 4: 1 Kings to Malachi [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1993], 196.)

 

 

1st and 2nd Samuel – Covenant history

 

1st and 2nd Kings – What went wrong with Israel, (both kingdoms)?

 

1st and 2nd Chronicles – History of the Southern (Judah) kingdom

 

There is another book of Chronicles which has been lost.  Like the Book of Mormon, these books were written after the events took place; each writer had their own agenda for their words.  These were written post-destruction of Israel.

 

Saul is the united king for all of Israel, yet he follows some pagan practices.  David follows Jehovah his entire life, yet he doesn’t always keep the commandments.  Solomon follows many pagan practices; he doesn’t follow Jehovah very long.

 

The divided kingdoms hated each other and fought frequently against each other.  It’s like our Civil War.

 

2 Kings 25 – Part of the remnant goes to Egypt, Jeremiah is among them and we don’t hear from him again.

 

(2 Kings 25:27-30.)

 

27 ¶ And it came to pass in the seven and thirtieth year of the captivity of Jehoiachin king of Judah, in the twelfth month, on the seven and twentieth day of the month, that Evil-merodach king of Babylon in the year that he began to reign did lift up the head of Jehoiachin king of Judah out of prison;

 

28 And he spake kindly to him, and set his throne above the throne of the kings that were with him in Babylon;

 

29 And changed his prison garments: and he did eat bread continually before him all the days of his life.

 

30 And his allowance was a continual allowance given him of the king, a daily rate for every day, all the days of his life.

 

The account ends with Israel in Babylon, the writer is in exile and tells why they are in this predicament, the people broke their covenants.

 

(2 Chronicles 36:22-23.)

 

22 ¶ Now in the first year of Cyrus king of Persia, that the word of the LORD spoken by the mouth of Jeremiah might be accomplished, the LORD stirred up the spirit of Cyrus king of Persia, that he made a proclamation throughout all his kingdom, and put it also in writing, saying,

 

23 Thus saith Cyrus king of Persia, All the kingdoms of the earth hath the LORD God of heaven given me; and he hath charged me to build him an house in Jerusalem, which is in Judah. Who is there among you of all his people? The LORD his God be with him, and let him go up.

 

Focus is on Judah, they are ready to go home, and this is a later time period.  Both writers have different agendas.

 

721 BC – Northern kingdom is gone, Israel is scattered.  Judah remains and Hezekiah sees what happened and tries to prepare for the inevitable.  Isaiah and Micah were the prophets in the court and the land at this time, no separation of church and state at this time.  Apostate prophets were in the court also, the wicked kings listened to them over Isaiah and Jeremiah.  Jehovah is on your side if you listen to Him, make your alliance with Him, avoid alliances with other countries, especially Egypt.

 

Events Leading to the Fall of Jerusalem in 586 B.C.

 

Judah was desperate for a king who "did that which was right in the sight of the Lord" (2 Chron. 29:2). That need was fulfilled in Hezekiah, who reigned from 715 to 687 B.C. He kept the commandments and trusted in the Lord to a greater degree than had any other king during Jerusalem's three centuries as a political and spiritual capital. He ordered the Temple to be cleansed, appointed proper courses of priests and Levites, commanded that Israelites from Dan to Beersheba join in a grand Passover celebration once again, and decreed that they pay their tithes (see 2 Chron. 29-31). Hezekiah removed the high places and altars, broke down the images, and cut down the groves. He destroyed the bronze serpent that Moses had made in Sinai because the Judahites had been burning incense to it, thus perverting a symbol of the Messiah (see 2 Kgs. 18:4; 2 Chron. 31:1). Hezekiah also made plans to reunite all the tribes of the north and south, thus reasserting the claim of the house of David to rule over all the lands of Israel. fn "And in every work that he began in the service of the house of God, and in the law, and in the commandments, to seek his God, he did it with all his heart, and prospered. And the Lord was with him; and he prospered whithersoever he went forth: and he rebelled against the king of Assyria, and served him not" (2 Chron. 31:21; 2 Kgs. 18:7).

 

A glance at Bible Map 10, which shows the extent of the mighty Assyrian Empire and the tiny tributary kingdom of Judah, is sufficient to convince anyone of the daring of Hezekiah in rebelling against Assyria. The map does not tell the whole story, however. With the death of Sargon in 705 B.C., cities up and down the coasts of Phoenicia and Canaan revolted against Assyria. Babylon also had a new and ambitious king. Egypt was ready to oppose Assyrian penetration. Hezekiah knew the time was right to break away from the Assyrian overlords, but he also realized that it was only a matter of time until the brutal armies of the empire would return to crush the rebellion.

 

Hezekiah's Preparations for War

 

Hezekiah began refortifying the city walls to prepare Jerusalem for the retaliatory invasion. A two-hundred-foot (sixty-five-meter) section of Hezekiah's wall has been uncovered in recent years in today's Jewish Quarter of the Old City. fn The "broad wall," as it is called in Nehemiah 3:8 and 12:38, is twenty-five feet wide (seven meters), testimony of the serious fortification works of Jerusalem's king. As archaeologists cleared away the debris of centuries, they exposed to view houses that were destroyed along the course of Hezekiah's protective wall, just as Isaiah noted: "Ye have seen also the breaches of the city of David, that they are many: and ye gathered together the waters of the lower pool. And ye have numbered the houses of Jerusalem, and the houses have ye broken down to fortify the wall" (Isa. 22:9-10).

Hezekiah cut an underground tunnel to ensure a constant supply of water from the Gihon Spring into the city. Second Chronicles 32:30 says, "This same Hezekiah also stopped the upper watercourse of Gihon, and brought it straight down to the west side of the city of David." This refers to Hezekiah's famous water tunnel, which still exists today, twenty-seven hundred years later. An inscription discovered in 1880, twenty feet inside the south end of the tunnel, tells the story of how the two teams of workmen, one from each end, chiseled 1,748 feet (nearly one-third of a mile) through solid limestone and how they met in the middle. It is the longest biblical Hebrew inscription ever found in the Holy Land and the only monumental commemorative Hebrew text ever discovered on the west side of the Jordan. fn

 

With fortifications in place, Hezekiah and Judah awaited the Assyrian onslaught. fn Sennacherib, King of Assyria, 705-681 B.C.

 

"Now in the fourteenth year of king Hezekiah did Sennacherib king of Assyria come up against all the fenced cities of Judah, and took them. And Hezekiah king of Judah sent to the king of Assyria to Lachish, saying, I have offended; return from me: that which thou puttest on me will I bear. And the king of Assyria appointed unto Hezekiah king of Judah three hundred talents of silver and thirty talents of gold" (2 Kgs. 18:13-14).

 

Another archaeological discovery that helps corroborate the Bible is King Sennacherib's record of the invasion called the Sennacherib Prism. fn It confirms that Hezekiah did try to buy off the Assyrians, but the tribute imposed was eight hundred talents of silver and thirty of gold. According to 2 Kings 18:15-16, Hezekiah gathered together all the silver and gold in the Temple and in the king's house, even stripping off gold from Temple doors and pillars.

 

A contingent of Assyrian officials was sent to Jerusalem from Lachish, where Sennacherib was besieging Judah's strongest fortified position in the Shephelah, the region of low hills southwest of Jerusalem. fn Of all the conquered cities and fortifications, Sennacherib must have been particularly proud of his siege of Lachish. When he returned to Nineveh he had his artisans carve thirteen panels at his palace—a magnificent battle panorama—depicting details of the siege of Lachish. It shows the battering rams used to penetrate the strong and heavily guarded walls of Lachish. The panorama also shows the fighting gear and apparel of Assyrians and Judahites and the barbaric methods the Assyrians used to kill their captives. These palace wall-reliefs were excavated in the mid 1800s in Nineveh and are now in the British Museum. fn Excavations at Lachish reveal intense destruction in its thick layers of ash—Sennacherib's "calling card" at Lachish. fn

 

Sennacherib sent officers to Jerusalem to harass and threaten King Hezekiah and his people. The Assyrians "stood by the conduit of the upper pool, which is in the highway of the fuller's field"—in other words, across from the Gihon Spring—and taunted the citizens of Jerusalem in their own Hebrew language, warning them not to trust in Hezekiah or in the God of Israel or in the bruised reed of Egypt:

 

Let not Hezekiah deceive you: for he shall not be able to deliver you out of [the king of Assyria's] hand:

 

Neither let Hezekiah make you trust in the Lord, saying, The Lord will surely deliver us, and this city shall not be delivered into the hand of the king of Assyria. . . .

 

Hath any of the gods of the nations delivered at all his land out of the hand of the king of Assyria? . . .

 

Who are they among all the gods of the countries, that have delivered their country out of mine hand, that the Lord should deliver Jerusalem out of mine hand? (2 Kgs. 18:29-30, 33, 35)

 

Sennacherib planned to remove systematically all opposition at Jerusalem's western approaches in the Shephelah and then advance on the political eagle nesting in the top of the hills. After heavy losses in the Shephelah, Jerusalem had no hope of standing up to Sennacherib's war machine.

 

King Hezekiah took a written message from Sennacherib up to the House of the Lord, and there, in the holy sanctuary, he spread the threatening letter before the Lord and prayed fervently (see 2 Kgs. 19:14-15; Isa. 37:14-15). In that very hour the voice of a lone man speaking for God was heard in the city, and word was sent to King Hezekiah, assuring him and his subjects that the place God had chosen to put His Name was still in His hands. The Assyrian blasphemers, Isaiah prophesied, would find only death and destruction for themselves if they came to Jerusalem:

 

Thus saith the Lord, Be not afraid of the words which thou hast heard, with which the servants of the king of Assyria have blasphemed me.

 

Behold, I will send a blast upon him, and he shall hear a rumour, and shall return to his own land; and I will cause him to fall by the sword in his own land. . . .

 

Therefore thus saith the Lord concerning the king of Assyria, He shall not come into this city, nor shoot an arrow [here], nor come before it with shield, nor cast a bank against it.

 

By the way that he came, by the same shall he return, and shall not come into this city, saith the Lord. (2 Kgs. 19:6-7, 32-33)

 

Miraculous Deliverance of Jerusalem

 

In 701 B.C. Sennacherib was poised to strike Jerusalem with full military might to reduce the rebels to humiliating submission. The following account of his view of the campaign is excerpted from the Sennacherib Prism:

 

As to Hezekiah, the Jew, he did not submit to my yoke. I laid siege to forty-six of his strong cities, walled forts and to the countless small villages in their vicinity, and conquered [them] by means of well-stamped [earth-]ramps, and battering-rams brought [thus] near [to the walls] [combined with] the attack by foot soldiers, [using] mines, breeches as well as sapper work. I drove out [of them] 200,150 people, young and old, male and female, horses, mules, donkeys, camels, big and small cattle beyond counting, and considered [them] booty. Himself I made a prisoner in Jerusalem, his royal residence, like a bird in a cage. I surrounded him with earthwork in order to molest those who were leaving his city's gate. fn

 

Sennacherib's final statement is a boast that is historically untrue, as we learn from the biblical account. Isaiah had prophesied that the king would "not come into this city, nor shoot an arrow [here], nor come before it with shield, nor cast a bank [a siege ramp] against it" (2 Kgs. 19:32).

 

Following is what actually did happen to Sennacherib and his hosts:

 

It came to pass that night, that the angel of the Lord went out, and smote in the camp of the Assyrians an hundred fourscore and five thousand: and when they arose early in the morning [those who were still alive], behold, they were all dead corpses.

 

So Sennacherib king of Assyria departed, and went and returned, and dwelt at Nineveh.

 

And it came to pass, as he was worshipping in the house of Nisroch his god, that . . . his sons smote him with the sword. (2 Kgs. 19:35-37)

 

The Greek historian Herodotus, in the fifth century before Christ, suggested in his writings that mice caused the Assyrians to withdraw as some kind of plague swept through their camp. fn That Sennacherib did return and dwell at Nineveh is confirmed in Assyrian annals, and that his sons later murdered him (twenty years later, in 681 B.C.) is also confirmed in Assyrian documents. Thus were the prophecies of Isaiah fulfilled. fn

 

The confrontation between Hezekiah and Sennacherib and the miraculous deliverance of Jerusalem made an indelible impression on the citizens of Judah. The episode has received further fame in a more modern day through the splendid poetry of Lord Byron in The Destruction of Sennacherib (1815). fn

 

The Assyrian came down like the wolf on the fold,

And his cohorts were gleaming in purple and gold,

And the sheen of their spears was like stars on the sea,

When the blue wave rolls nightly on deep Galilee.

Like the leaves of the forest when summer is green,

That host with their banners at sunset were seen:

Like the leaves of the forest when autumn hath blown,

That host on the morrow lay withered and strown.

For the Angel of Death spread his wings on the blast,

And breathed in the face of the foe as he pass'd

And the eyes of the sleepers wax'd deadly and chill,

And their hearts but once heaved, and forever grew still!

And there lay the steed with his nostril all wide,

But through it there roll'd not the breath of his pride;

And the foam of his gasping lay white on the turf,

And cold as the spray of the rock-beating surf.

And there lay the rider distorted and pale,

With the dew on his brow, and the rust on his mail:

And the tents were all silent, the banners alone,

The lances unlifted, the trumpet unblown.

And the widows of Ashur are loud in their wail,

And the idols are broke in the temple of Baal;

And the might of the Gentile, unsmote by the sword,

Hath melted like snow in the glance of the Lord!

 

When Hezekiah was found to be deathly ill, he learned that the Lord intervenes not only in national crises but also in personal crises. The Lord granted good king Hezekiah another fifteen years to live (see 2 Kgs. 20; Isa. 39).

 

Another episode during this period should not go unmentioned. Hezekiah openly showed the treasures of the kingdom to a Babylonian delegation, which had undoubtedly come to Jerusalem with ulterior motives. Isaiah responded to Hezekiah's political naivete with a prophecy that the nation's treasures and some of the king's descendants would be carried away into Babylon, a prophecy that stood as a warning to Jerusalemites for the next century (see 2 Kgs. 20:12-18; Isa. 39).

 

During the reigns of the Assyrian kings Esarhaddon (681-669 B.C.) and his successor, Ashurbanipal, the empire was at its height, extending from Persia to Egypt. Esarhaddon destroyed the once-renowned Egyptian city of Memphis. And to the last strong Assyrian king, Ashurbanipal (669-627 B.C.), is attributed the dubious honor of having sacked one of the greatest cities of the ancient world, Thebes in Upper Egypt, in 663 b.c13

 

Because of rivalry between the rulers of Assyria and Babylon, the Assyrian Empire rapidly deteriorated. Ashur, Nineveh, Calah, and Dur-Sharrukin all fell to the Neo-Babylonian Empire between 615 and 612 B.C.

 

Ironically, good King Hezekiah's son Manasseh (687-642) and his grandson Amon (642-640) were two of the worst kings Judah had ever seen. Manasseh, who reigned longest of all Judah's kings, introduced shockingly sacrilegious and profane practices into the Holy City: he set up altars to Baal and an asherah (a fertility-cult goddess) for worship in the court of the Temple of Jehovah. Manasseh led the people in worshipping the "host of heaven," sacrificing children, engaging in Satanic spiritualism, and murdering innocent citizens who refused to participate in such perversions. By God's own judgment Manasseh was characterized as worse than all the peoples who had been removed from the land so the Israelites could inherit it (see 2 Kgs. 21:3-11). fn Manasseh's son, Amon, followed in his father's footsteps, continuing the spiritual havoc in Jerusalem. Note the prophetic pronouncement of what those evils would bring upon Jerusalem: "Thus saith the Lord God of Israel, Behold, I am bringing such evil upon Jerusalem and Judah, that whosoever heareth of it, both his ears shall tingle . . . and I will wipe Jerusalem as a man wipeth a dish, wiping it, and turning it upside down" (2 Kgs. 21:12-13).

 

 

(David B. Galbraith, D. Kelly Ogden, and Andrew C. Skinner, Jerusalem: The Eternal City [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1996], 94.)

 

 

We know more about Jeremiah then practically any other prophet in the OT.

 

(Jeremiah 1:1-3.)

 

1 The words of Jeremiah the son of Hilkiah, of the priests that were in Anathoth in the land of Benjamin:

 

2 To whom the word of the LORD came in the days of Josiah the son of Amon king of Judah, in the thirteenth year of his reign.

 

3 It came also in the days of Jehoiakim the son of Josiah king of Judah, unto the end of the eleventh year of Zedekiah the son of Josiah king of Judah, unto the carrying away of Jerusalem captive in the fifth month.

 

Reforms of King Josiah

 

In the later part of the seventh century before Christ, the Assyrian Empire weakened rapidly because of internal agitation and pressures in its widespread conquered lands. With Assyrian disintegration Judah was able to expand—its last period of greatness—under King Josiah (640-609 B.C.). Josiah extended Jerusalem's control to former Israelite territories that had been for most of a century provinces of greater Assyria. He also instituted some rigorous religious reforms, as his great-grandfather, Hezekiah, had done (2 Kgs. 22:4-20). He made repairs in the Temple, during which a copy of the book of the Law was found. No direct record identifies the book, but many of the king's reforms parallel Deuteronomy 16:2; 18:10-11; 23:2-4, 7, 17-18, 21, 24; 31:11. The king and the priests read in the book of the Law the terrible curses that would follow such spiritual rebellion and apostasy as had persisted during the previous two generations. They knew that the Lord was angry with the nation of Judah. They asked a prophetess, a woman named Huldah (a contemporary of Jeremiah and Lehi), whether the curses would be forthcoming. Huldah's response was specific and foreboding:

 

Thus saith the Lord, Behold, I will bring evil upon this place, and upon the inhabitants thereof, even all the words of the book which the king of Judah hath read:

 

Because they have forsaken me, and have burned incense unto other gods, that they might provoke me to anger with all the works of their hands; therefore my wrath shall be kindled against this place, and shall not be quenched.

 

But to the king of Judah . . . shall ye say to him, Thus saith the Lord God of Israel, As touching the words which thou hast heard;

 

Because thine heart was tender, and thou hast humbled thyself before the Lord, when thou heardest what I spake against this place, and against the inhabitants thereof, that they should become a desolation and a curse, and hast rent thy clothes, and wept before me; I also have heard thee, saith the Lord.

 

Behold therefore, I will gather thee unto thy fathers, and thou shalt be gathered into thy grave in peace; and thine eyes shall not see all the evil which I will bring upon this place. (2 Kgs. 22:16-20)

 

Josiah called a solemn assembly with priesthood leaders, prophets, and all the inhabitants of Jerusalem listening as he read the book of the covenant that had been found in the Temple. The king and all the people covenanted to keep the Lord's commandments. The king and priests burned all Baalistic objects in the Kidron Valley. The statue of the fertility goddess that had been in the House of the Lord was ground to powder. Josiah ousted all idolatrous priests and destroyed all shrines from Geba to Beersheba, the borders of Judah at that time (see Bible Map 9). He ordered the destruction of all "the high places that were before Jerusalem, which were on the right hand of the mount of corruption, which Solomon the king of Israel had builded for Ashtoreth" and other idol gods. The king also ordered wreckers to break down and burn the altar and high place that were still at Bethel from the days of Jeroboam (see 2 Kgs. 23:1-15).

 

Josiah's enlightened reign ended with his early death at Megiddo, where he had gone to stop the Egyptian advance under Pharaoh Nechoh, who was marching towards the Euphrates River to help the last Assyrian king against Babylon. Josiah apparently wanted to keep Egypt, Assyria's loyal ally to the end, from acquiring any control over Canaan. Because Nechoh was detained by Josiah at Megiddo, his efforts to assist Assyria were seriously impaired, and Assyria was defeated by the powerful new Babylonian ruler, Nebuchadnezzar, in 609 B.C. Falling back to his Egyptian homeland, Nechoh imposed Egyptian authority over Judah, from 609 to 605 B.C., before the Babylonian invasions of Judah. Josiah's death marked the beginning of the end for the kingdom of Judah.

 

The history of the Holy Land is essentially an account of the struggles between Mesopotamia and Egypt to control the land-bridge of the Near East. The contest between Babylon and Egypt at the end of the seventh century before Christ is a classic illustration of this historical axiom. During this struggle Judah was eventually annihilated. By the year 604 B.C. the entire Levant was the domain of Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon: "And the king of Egypt came not again any more out of his land: for the king of Babylon had taken from the river of Egypt unto the river Euphrates all that pertained to the king of Egypt" (2 Kgs. 24:7).

 

The Babylonian Empire

 

The southern part of Mesopotamia was known in antiquity as Babylon or Chaldea. Its chief cities were Babylon (Hebrew, Babel, literally, "gate of God"), Ur, Erech (Uruk), and Nippur (see Bible Map 11). The city of Babylon was itself one of the wonders of the ancient world, with its ziggurat and many miles of hanging (terraced) gardens. Babylon was the imperial capital of the Babylonians and was later the imperial capital of the Persians and of Alexander of Macedonia.

 

The Babylonian Empire was mighty, but it was short-lived. Compared to its predecessor, Assyria, and its successor, Persia, each of which endured for more than two centuries, the new Babylonian Empire rose to greatness, left its heavy mark on ancient Near Eastern history, especially Jewish history, and then was swept into oblivion—all within seventy years. Babylon's strength and evil grandeur became proverbial in later scripture as a symbol of the wicked. She is called the apostate, the whore of all the earth, the mother of harlots (a foil to Zion, who represents the righteous). fn Doctrine and Covenants 133:14 records the Lord's warning to the Latter-day Saints: "Go ye out from among the nations, even from Babylon, from the midst of wickedness, which is spiritual Babylon." And in our modern hymns we still sing of Babylon as the representative of darkness in the earth: "O Babylon, O Babylon, we bid thee farewell" and "Babylon the great is falling; God shall all her towers o'erthrow." fn

 

The Voice of Warning: Jeremiah, Lehi, and Others

 

Jeremiah had begun his ministry in Jerusalem more than twenty years before the conquests of Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon. fn He was unpopular and was considered treasonous by some factions in the capital because he advocated acquiescence fn—surrender to the Babylonians, submit to exile, and make the most of a new but temporary home: build houses, plant gardens, marry, rear families, even pray for the peace of Babylon! (see Jer. 29:4-7)—all to preserve a remnant that would return to Jerusalem just a few decades later, as prophesied. fn

 

On one occasion Jeremiah stood in the court of the Temple warning that the Lord was going to make his House like Shiloh, and the city of Jerusalem desolate without an inhabitant (see Jer. 26:9). fn "All the people were gathered against Jeremiah in the house of the Lord," intending to kill him (just as when Jesus later prophesied the destruction of the next Temple at the same place; the people tried to kill Jesus; see Matt. 24:1-2; John 8:20, 37-59). Certain elders of the people reminded the crowd to be careful what they did with Jeremiah—other prophets had also spoken in the name of the Lord and prophesied the destruction of Jerusalem; for example, Micah of Moresheth-gath in the days of Hezekiah, and a contemporary of Jeremiah, one Urijah of Kiriath-jearim (see Jer. 26:17-20).

 

Yet another prophet was in the city at the time, teaching the same things. Lehi warned of the impending destruction of Jerusalem, and he testified of the people's wickedness and of the coming of a Messiah. "When the Jews heard these things they were angry . . . and they also sought his life" (1 Ne. 1:20). fn

 

The Book of Mormon says, "There came many prophets, prophesying unto the people that they must repent, or the great city Jerusalem must be destroyed" (1 Ne. 1:4). Amos taught that God would do nothing without first revealing it to his prophets (see Amos 3:7). The Lord always gives plenty of warning. The Book of Mormon's "many prophets" is true: Jeremiah, Lehi, Huldah, Zephaniah, Habakkuk, Daniel, Ezekiel, and Urijah were all contemporaries.

 

Lehi's sons Laman and Lemuel did not believe that Jerusalem could be destroyed (see 1 Ne. 2:13). There was no historical precedent for such a bold prophecy: Jerusalem had never been destroyed in all of Israelite history, and in fact, Jerusalem may have been regarded by some as inviolable; for example, at the time of Sennacherib's siege it had been miraculously preserved. fn The prophets, on the other hand, knew that the City's inviolability was based on her spirituality. Judah's God had been patient and long-suffering and had given ample warning and sufficient time to repent. Even after Lehi fled Jerusalem to escape its imminent destruction, fourteen years transpired before Nebuchadnezzar's armies leveled the City and the Temple.

 

 

(David B. Galbraith, D. Kelly Ogden, and Andrew C. Skinner, Jerusalem: The Eternal City [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1996], 102.)

 

 

(2 Kings 18:1-8.) – Hezekiah rebels against Assyrians, he destroys idolatry in Israel

 

1 Now it came to pass in the third year of Hoshea son of Elah king of Israel, that Hezekiah the son of Ahaz king of Judah began to reign.

 

2 Twenty and five years old was he when he began to reign; and he reigned twenty and nine years in Jerusalem. His mother's name also was Abi, the daughter of Zachariah.

 

3 And he did that which was right in the sight of the LORD, according to all that David his father did.

 

4 ¶ He removed the high places, and brake the images, and cut down the groves, and brake in pieces the brasen serpent that Moses had made: for unto those days the children of Israel did burn incense to it: and he called it Nehushtan.

 

5 He trusted in the LORD God of Israel; so that after him was none like him among all the kings of Judah, nor any that were before him.

 

6 For he clave to the LORD, and departed not from following him, but kept his commandments, which the LORD commanded Moses.

 

7 And the LORD was with him; and he prospered whithersoever he went forth: and he rebelled against the king of Assyria, and served him not.

 

8 He smote the Philistines, even unto Gaza, and the borders thereof, from the tower of the watchmen to the fenced city.

 

Isaiah said to break the alliance with Egypt and make an alliance with Jehovah, keep the commandments.

 

Bruce described what the Assyrians did to those who rebelled against them.  The British Museum – Lachish Room, the battle is shown in one scene, beginning to end.

 

Egypt wanted the alliance since Judah was in the way of the Assyrians before they got to Egypt, nice guys!

 

Hezekiah had to clean house, and exercise great faith in Jehovah.  He did it and the Lord fought the battle and won, 185,000 killed in one night.

 

The people repented and reformed, they cut the covenant, and the Lord blessed them accordingly.

 

Wicked Manasseh, what happened to his counselors while he was young?

 

 

(2 Kings 21:1-9.)

 

1 Manasseh was twelve years old when he began to reign, and reigned fifty and five years in Jerusalem. And his mother's name was Hephzi-bah.

 

2 And he did that which was evil in the sight of the LORD, after the abominations of the heathen, whom the LORD cast out before the children of Israel.

 

3 For he built up again the high places which Hezekiah his father had destroyed; and he reared up altars for Baal, and made a grove, as did Ahab king of Israel; and worshipped all the host of heaven, and served them.

 

4 And he built altars in the house of the LORD, of which the LORD said, In Jerusalem will I put my name.

 

5 And he built altars for all the host of heaven in the two courts of the house of the LORD.

 

6 And he made his son pass through the fire, and observed times, and used enchantments, and dealt with familiar spirits and wizards: he wrought much wickedness in the sight of the LORD, to provoke him to anger.

 

7 And he set a graven image of the grove that he had made in the house, of which the LORD said to David, and to Solomon his son, In this house, and in Jerusalem, which I have chosen out of all tribes of Israel, will I put my name for ever:

 

8 Neither will I make the feet of Israel move any more out of the land which I gave their fathers; only if they will observe to do according to all that I have commanded them, and according to all the law that my servant Moses commanded them.

 

9 But they hearkened not: and Manasseh seduced them to do more evil than did the nations whom the LORD destroyed before the children of Israel.

 

 

He ruled for 55 years, whole generations did not know the ways of Jehovah they totally forgot the covenant.  There is no hope!

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 82:7.)

 

7 And now, verily I say unto you, I, the Lord, will not lay any sin to your charge; go your ways and sin no more; but unto that soul who sinneth shall the former sins return, saith the Lord your God.

 

The former sins return, your repentance has become null and void, you are worse off.  The groove of sin is very deep with Manasseh, the people suffer greatly during his reign.

 

(2 Kings 21:10-16.)

 

10 ¶ And the LORD spake by his servants the prophets, saying,

 

11 Because Manasseh king of Judah hath done these abominations, and hath done wickedly above all that the Amorites did, which were before him, and hath made Judah also to sin with his idols:

 

12 Therefore thus saith the LORD God of Israel, Behold, I am bringing such evil upon Jerusalem and Judah, that whosoever heareth of it, both his ears shall tingle.

 

13 And I will stretch over Jerusalem the line of Samaria, and the plummet of the house of Ahab: and I will wipe Jerusalem as a man wipeth a dish, wiping it, and turning it upside down.

 

14 And I will forsake the remnant of mine inheritance, and deliver them into the hand of their enemies; and they shall become a prey and a spoil to all their enemies;

 

15 Because they have done that which was evil in my sight, and have provoked me to anger, since the day their fathers came forth out of Egypt, even unto this day.

 

16 Moreover Manasseh shed innocent blood very much, till he had filled Jerusalem from one end to another; beside his sin wherewith he made Judah to sin, in doing that which was evil in the sight of the LORD.

 

 

Josiah’s reforms were more complete then Hezekiah, yet they didn’t work, the people were too deep in sin.

 

Josiah is eight years old when he begins his reign, 640-609 BC

 

(2 Kings 22:8-14.)

 

8 ¶ And Hilkiah the high priest said unto Shaphan the scribe, I have found the book of the law in the house of the LORD. And Hilkiah gave the book to Shaphan, and he read it.

 

9 And Shaphan the scribe came to the king, and brought the king word again, and said, Thy servants have gathered the money that was found in the house, and have delivered it into the hand of them that do the work, that have the oversight of the house of the LORD.

 

10 And Shaphan the scribe shewed the king, saying, Hilkiah the priest hath delivered me a book. And Shaphan read it before the king.

 

11 And it came to pass, when the king had heard the words of the book of the law, that he rent his clothes.

 

12 And the king commanded Hilkiah the priest, and Ahikam the son of Shaphan, and Achbor the son of Michaiah, and Shaphan the scribe, and Asahiah a servant of the king's, saying,

 

13 Go ye, enquire of the LORD for me, and for the people, and for all Judah, concerning the words of this book that is found: for great is the wrath of the LORD that is kindled against us, because our fathers have not hearkened unto the words of this book, to do according unto all that which is written concerning us.

 

14 So Hilkiah the priest, and Ahikam, and Achbor, and Shaphan, and Asahiah, went unto Huldah the prophetess, the wife of Shallum the son of Tikvah, the son of Harhas, keeper of the wardrobe; (now she dwelt in Jerusalem in the college;) and they communed with her.

 

 

2 Chronicles 34 – 3 events take place

 

  1. He cleans house
  2. Finds and reads the law in the temple
  3. Makes a covenant with all with Jehovah

 

 

What gets this young boy to turn to God?  Nothing is said about this, an interesting question.

 

(2 Chronicles 34:29-33.)

 

29 ¶ Then the king sent and gathered together all the elders of Judah and Jerusalem.

 

30 And the king went up into the house of the LORD, and all the men of Judah, and the inhabitants of Jerusalem, and the priests, and the Levites, and all the people, great and small: and he read in their ears all the words of the book of the covenant that was found in the house of the LORD.

 

31 And the king stood in his place, and made a covenant before the LORD, to walk after the LORD, and to keep his commandments, and his testimonies, and his statutes, with all his heart, and with all his soul, to perform the words of the covenant which are written in this book.

 

32 And he caused all that were present in Jerusalem and Benjamin to stand to it. And the inhabitants of Jerusalem did according to the covenant of God, the God of their fathers.

 

33 And Josiah took away all the abominations out of all the countries that pertained to the children of Israel, and made all that were present in Israel to serve, even to serve the LORD their God. And all his days they departed not from following the LORD, the God of their fathers.

 

Who attended this meeting?  Jeremiah, Lehi, Sariah, Laban, the kids, first time they heard the scriptures.  This gives you a sense of what is happening in Jerusalem at the time of Lehi, they are witnesses of what is happening in Jerusalem.  They all entered the covenant, Josiah made a formal covenant ritual, and literally cutting the bullock in half and having the people walk between the 2 halves.

 

(Ezekiel 1:1-3.)

 

1 Now it came to pass in the thirtieth year, in the fourth month, in the fifth day of the month, as I was among the captives by the river of Chebar, that the heavens were opened, and I saw visions of God.

 

2 In the fifth day of the month, which was the fifth year of king Jehoiachin's captivity,

 

3 The word of the LORD came expressly unto Ezekiel the priest, the son of Buzi, in the land of the Chaldeans by the river Chebar; and the hand of the LORD was there upon him.

 

 

This king was the true king; Zedekiah was a puppet king, not liked by the people, not mentioned in some chronologies in the scriptures.  Lehi and the family were gone at this point.

 

 

Jeremiah and Ezekiel are priests in the temple and witnesses of the events in and around Jerusalem.  Interesting story about Ezekiel, saw events in a vision, he was in captivity.

 

Jeremiah mentions this ceremony

 

(Jeremiah 34:18-20.)

 

18 And I will give the men that have transgressed my covenant, which have not performed the words of the covenant which they had made before me, when they cut the calf in twain, and passed between the parts thereof,

 

19 The princes of Judah, and the princes of Jerusalem, the eunuchs, and the priests, and all the people of the land, which passed between the parts of the calf;

 

20 I will even give them into the hand of their enemies, and into the hand of them that seek their life: and their dead bodies shall be for meat unto the fowls of the heaven, and to the beasts of the earth.

 

This has temple implications for us, may this happen to me if I break the covenant.

 

2 Chronicles 34:30 = Jeremiah 34:12-20

 

(2 Kings 23:1-27.)

 

1 And the king sent, and they gathered unto him all the elders of Judah and of Jerusalem.

 

2 And the king went up into the house of the LORD, and all the men of Judah and all the inhabitants of Jerusalem with him, and the priests, and the prophets, and all the people, both small and great: and he read in their ears all the words of the book of the covenant which was found in the house of the LORD.

 

3 ¶ And the king stood by a pillar, and made a covenant before the LORD, to walk after the LORD, and to keep his commandments and his testimonies and his statutes with all their heart and all their soul, to perform the words of this covenant that were written in this book. And all the people stood to the covenant.

 

4 And the king commanded Hilkiah the high priest, and the priests of the second order, and the keepers of the door, to bring forth out of the temple of the LORD all the vessels that were made for Baal, and for the grove, and for all the host of heaven: and he burned them without Jerusalem in the fields of Kidron, and carried the ashes of them unto Beth-el.

 

5 And he put down the idolatrous priests, whom the kings of Judah had ordained to burn incense in the high places in the cities of Judah, and in the places round about Jerusalem; them also that burned incense unto Baal, to the sun, and to the moon, and to the planets, and to all the host of heaven.

 

6 And he brought out the grove from the house of the LORD, without Jerusalem, unto the brook Kidron, and burned it at the brook Kidron, and stamped it small to powder, and cast the powder thereof upon the graves of the children of the people.

 

7 And he brake down the houses of the sodomites, that were by the house of the LORD, where the women wove hangings for the grove.

 

8 And he brought all the priests out of the cities of Judah, and defiled the high places where the priests had burned incense, from Geba to Beer-sheba, and brake down the high places of the gates that were in the entering in of the gate of Joshua the governor of the city, which were on a man's left hand at the gate of the city.

 

9 Nevertheless the priests of the high places came not up to the altar of the LORD in Jerusalem, but they did eat of the unleavened bread among their brethren.

 

10 And he defiled Topheth, which is in the valley of the children of Hinnom, that no man might make his son or his daughter to pass through the fire to Molech.

 

11 And he took away the horses that the kings of Judah had given to the sun, at the entering in of the house of the LORD, by the chamber of Nathan-melech the chamberlain, which was in the suburbs, and burned the chariots of the sun with fire.

 

12 And the altars that were on the top of the upper chamber of Ahaz, which the kings of Judah had made, and the altars which Manasseh had made in the two courts of the house of the LORD, did the king beat down, and brake them down from thence, and cast the dust of them into the brook Kidron.

 

13 And the high places that were before Jerusalem, which were on the right hand of the mount of corruption, which Solomon the king of Israel had builded for Ashtoreth the abomination of the Zidonians, and for Chemosh the abomination of the Moabites, and for Milcom the abomination of the children of Ammon, did the king defile.

 

14 And he brake in pieces the images, and cut down the groves, and filled their places with the bones of men.

 

15 ¶ Moreover the altar that was at Beth-el, and the high place which Jeroboam the son of Nebat, who made Israel to sin, had made, both that altar and the high place he brake down, and burned the high place, and stamped it small to powder, and burned the grove.

16 And as Josiah turned himself, he spied the sepulchres that were there in the mount, and sent, and took the bones out of the sepulchres, and burned them upon the altar, and polluted it, according to the word of the LORD which the man of God proclaimed, who proclaimed these words.

 

17 Then he said, What title is that that I see? And the men of the city told him, It is the sepulchre of the man of God, which came from Judah, and proclaimed these things that thou hast done against the altar of Beth-el.

 

18 And he said, Let him alone; let no man move his bones. So they let his bones alone, with the bones of the prophet that came out of Samaria.

 

19 And all the houses also of the high places that were in the cities of Samaria, which the kings of Israel had made to provoke the LORD to anger, Josiah took away, and did to them according to all the acts that he had done in Beth-el.

 

20 And he slew all the priests of the high places that were there upon the altars, and burned men's bones upon them, and returned to Jerusalem.

 

21 ¶ And the king commanded all the people, saying, Keep the passover unto the LORD your God, as it is written in the book of this covenant.

 

22 Surely there was not holden such a passover from the days of the judges that judged Israel, nor in all the days of the kings of Israel, nor of the kings of Judah;

 

23 But in the eighteenth year of king Josiah, wherein this passover was holden to the LORD in Jerusalem.

 

24 ¶ Moreover the workers with familiar spirits, and the wizards, and the images, and the idols, and all the abominations that were spied in the land of Judah and in Jerusalem, did Josiah put away, that he might perform the words of the law which were written in the book that Hilkiah the priest found in the house of the LORD.

 

25 And like unto him was there no king before him, that turned to the LORD with all his heart, and with all his soul, and with all his might, according to all the law of Moses; neither after him arose there any like him.

 

26 ¶ Notwithstanding the LORD turned not from the fierceness of his great wrath, wherewith his anger was kindled against Judah, because of all the provocations that Manasseh had provoked him withal.

 

27 And the LORD said, I will remove Judah also out of my sight, as I have removed Israel, and will cast off this city Jerusalem which I have chosen, and the house of which I said, My name shall be there.

 

 

For all of his efforts Josiah’s reforms didn’t work, their hearts did not change yet it did help individuals but not the whole community.  Lehi is a classic example of this.

 

Jerusalem was like Sodom and Gomorrah.  Jeremiah was told not to marry, there wasn’t anyone good enough! 

 

Baruch is his scribe, faithful and true.  He wrote a biography about Jeremiah. 

 

The people of Jerusalem did not like Jeremiah at all; in fact they banned him from the temple, even though he was a priest!

 

Margaret Barker
What Did King Josiah Reform?
Presented 6 May 2003 at Brigham Young University

King Josiah changed the religion of Israel in 623 BC. According to the Old Testament account in 2 Kings 23 he removed all manner of idolatrous items from the temple and purified his kingdom of Canaanite practices.  Temple vessels made for Baal, Asherah and the host of heaven were removed, idolatrous priests were deposed, the Asherah itself was taken from the temple and burned, and much more besides.  An old law book had been discovered in the temple, and this had prompted the king to bring the religion of his kingdom into line with the requirements of that book. [1]  There could be only one temple, it stated, and so all other places of sacrificial worship had to be destroyed. [2]  The law book is easily recognizable as Deuteronomy, and so King Josiahs purge is usually known as the Deuteronomic reform of the temple.

Twenty five years after the work of Josiah, Jerusalem was attacked by the Babylonians under King Nebuchadnezzar, [3] and eleven years after the first attack, they returned to destroy the city and the temple.  Refugees fled south to Egypt, and we read in the book of Jeremiah how they would not accept the prophets interpretation of the disaster. [4]  He insisted that Jerusalem had fallen because of the sins of her people, but the refugees said it had fallen because of Josiah.  The king is not mentioned by name, but there can be no doubt what the refugees had in mind. [5]  Until very recently, they said, they and their ancestors in Judah and Jerusalem had worshipped differently and had prospered, but when they changed their manner of worship, disaster had followed.

They had worshiped the Queen of Heaven by offering incense, libations and special loaves to represent her. [6]  Now the Queen of Heaven is not mentioned in the account of Josiahs purge, but the major item removed from the temple was the Asherah which was dragged out and burned.  Later Jewish texts (m.Aboda Zarah 3) described the Asherah as a stylized tree, and Deuteronomy had forbidden any such tree or any pillar beside an altar for the Lord (Deuteronomy 16.21).  It was these spiritual heirs of Josiah who returned from Babylon to rebuild the temple, and their influence can be found in many of the texts we now read as the Old Testament. [7] 

These texts do not tell the whole story.

The refugees who fled to Egypt were not the only ones who thought that Josiahs purge had been a disaster.  By surveying the texts that still survive, we can begin to piece together what Josiah destroyed.  Many of those texts imply that Josiahs purge was disaster.

In 1897 a text was discovered in an old Cairo synagogue which described a group of covenanters in the land of Damascus.  Fragments of the same text were later found among the Dead Sea Scrolls, showing that the text had been known in the time of Jesus.  This Damascus Document, as it is called, describes the Babylonian destruction of Jerusalem as punishment for the unfaithfulness of the people – Jeremiah would have agreed with that – but it also says that the whole second temple era which followed was the age of wrath.  Far from restoring the true religion of Jerusalem, the people who returned from Babylon to rebuild the temple were led by false teachers who had not been chosen by God.  Israel had gone astray in the hidden things, they had lost the truth.  They did not observe the true calendar or the correct forms of worship, and they had corrupt priests.  The Damascus Covenant group believed that they were the guardians of the true priestly traditions, and their reward would be to return to the glory of Adam and to be resurrected.  They had kept a record of their genealogies, and of what they had done. [8]

The Book of Enoch, known as 1 Enoch, gives a similar account. [9]  Preserved within the fifth section of this text is an ancient and cryptic account of the history of Israel.  Each period is described as a week and so the text is known as the Apocalypse of Weeks.  In the sixth week, all those who lived in the temple forsook Wisdom and lost their vision, and then the temple was burned.  Those who returned in the seventh week to rebuild the temple were an apostate generation whose deeds were evil (1 Enoch 93). [10]  Elsewhere Enoch records that those who built the second temple made impure and polluted offerings.  The people who preserved the Enoch texts looked forward to the Lord destroying that impure temple and building a new and greater temple in its place (1 Enoch 90.29).  They also claimed that the words of Scripture had been altered by godless people (1 Enoch 98,104).

On one of his heavenly journeys, Enoch also saw the fragrant tree of life which would one day be planted again in the temple, and its fruit given to the righteous.  He also saw dismembered branches from the tree, flourishing in a blessed place (1 Enoch 24-26).  In another vision, Enoch saw the fragrant tree as a fiery form, the place where the Lord came when he was in Paradise (2 Enoch 8).  Yet another text describes the fragrant tree as shining like the sun, and with fruits like clusters of white grapes (On the Origin of the World, CG II.5.110). [11]  Now the Book of Proverbs describes Wisdom as the Tree of Life (Proverbs 3.18), and those who are devoted to her as happy, a word play that sounds like the name Asherah. [12]  In this way, by piecing together fragments of tradition and folk memory, we can glimpse what Josiah must have removed from the temple.  The Asherah must have been the stylized Tree of Life, the symbol of Wisdom. [13]  When Moses was told to make the seven branched lamp, for the tabernacle, the menorah, he was told to make it like an almond tree (Exodus 25.31-39), and so it was probably the original menorah that Josiah removed and destroyed. [14]

The work of Josiah was not forgotten.  Even mainstream Jewish texts from well into the Christian era record that great changes took place at that time, and that the second temple was inferior to the first.  The great commentary on the book of Numbers, known as the Numbers Rabbah, said that in the time of the Messiah, five things would be restored which had been in the first temple but not in the second: the fire, the ark, the menorah, the spirit and the cherubim (Numbers Rabbah XV.10).  In other words, the true temple which the Messiah would restore was the first temple, the one Josiah had purged.  The mystery here is the menorah: there had been a menorah in the second temple, but it cannot have been the true menorah if this was deemed to be missing from the second temple.  The Babylonian Talmud records that Josiah had hidden away the ark, the holy anointing oil, the jar of manna and Aarons rod (b.Horayoth 12a).  Most of these items – the ark, the cherubim, the oil, the manna and Aarons rod – had been kept in the holy of holies to which only the high priests had access.  In other words, Josiahs changes concerned the high priests, and were thus changes at the very heart of the temple.

Josiah had not been the first king who attempted to change the religion of Israel and Judah.  King Hezekiah, in whose time Isaiah was a prophet in Jerusalem, removed hilltop places of worship, destroyed sacred pillars and broke down the Asherah (2 Kings 18.4).  When the Assyrian envoys came to demoralise the people of Jerusalem, they said that their Lord would no longer protect the city because the king had destroyed his places of worship (Isaiah 36.7).  Hezekiah was not seen by his contemporaries as a reformer.  Hezekiahs predecessor, King Ahaz, had followed the older religion: he had burned incense at the hilltop shrines and under sacred trees, and had even sacrificed his son (2 Chronicles 28.3-4; 2 Kings 16.3).  Isaiah had no word of condemnation for Ahaz on these matters; he only rebuked him for his lack of faith in the Lord when Jerusalem was threatened by enemies.  Isaiah, it would seem, favoured the older ways.  He spoke of the great tree which had been felled but preserved the holy seed in its stump (Isaiah 6.13), [15] and he compared the Servant of the Lord to a branch of the menorah, damaged but still able to give light (Isaiah 42.3). [16]

Almost everything that Josiah swept away can be matched in the religion of the patriarchs Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.  They had built shrines all over the land, wherever the Lord had appeared to them, and they had offered sacrifices under great trees (Genesis 12.6-7) and set up pillars to mark holy places (Genesis 28.18).  In the Old Testament as we know it, the Patriarchs before the time of Moses and the kings after him followed the religion that Deuteronomy condemned and Josiah purged.  The custom of child sacrifice, which Josiah abolished, had been required in the oldest of the Hebrew law codes (Exodus 22.29), and only the later modifications permitted a substitute offering of five silver shekels or a Levite for temple service (Exodus 13.15; Numbers 3.40-48).

This change is reflected in the way the story of Abraham and Isaac is told in our Old Testament.  Abraham had thought that the sacrifice of his son was necessary, but the Lord told him that a substitute should be offered (Genesis 22.12-13).  Another version of this story survived for centuries; that Isaac had actually been sacrificed and then resurrected. [17]  This version of the story appears both Jewish and Christian sources: in the Pseudo-Jonathan Targum, in the early Christian writings of Barnabas and Clement of Rome (Barnabas 7; 1 Clement 10 and 31), and is probably implied in the New Testament in the letters to the Hebrews (Hebrews 11.17-19; also James 2.21).  The sacrifice of the Son lies at the heart of Christianity, and the emphasis of the Letter to the Hebrews is that in the case of Jesus, no substitute was offered (Hebrews 9.12).  This shows that memories of the older religion and its stories survived for centuries, even though they do not appear in the biblical texts.

Abraham too had paid his tithe to Melchizedek, the priest king of Jerusalem (Genesis 14.18), and so the Melchizedek priesthood must have been part of the older religion. [18]  A fragmented text about Melchizedek was found among the Dead Sea Scrolls.  He was divine figure, the Messiah, expected to return at just the time when Jesus began his ministry, and to make the final great atonement. [19]  A damaged portion of the text seems to mention teachers who have been kept hidden and secret.  Nothing of the Melchizedek tradition survives in the biblical texts, apart from one text in the Psalm 110, and so we have to ask: Who preserved these Melchizedek traditions?

One way to reconstruct the religion of Jerusalem before Josiahs changes is to note how many of the practices forbidden by Deuteronomy are permitted elsewhere in the Old Testament.  Deuteronomy, for example, denies that any vision of God was seen when the Law was given: You saw no form; only a voice was heard (Deuteronomy 4.12), and yet the account in Exodus says that Moses went up the mountain with the leaders and elders of Israel and they saw the God of Israel (Exodus 24.10). [20]  Isaiah had seen the Lord high and lifted up and his train filled the temple (Isaiah 6.1).  The vision of God must have been a part of the older faith; there are several accounts of the Lord emerging from his holy place to bring judgement (Assumption of Moses 10, Deuteronomy 32.43, Habbakuk 2.20, Zephaniah 1.7), and prayers for the Lord to shine upon his people (Numbers 6.24ff).

Deuteronomy condemns regard for the host of heaven (Deuteronomy 4.19), the angels who were represented by the stars, even though an ancient title for the Lord was the Lord of Hosts.  The heavenly host of angels must have been part of the older faith. [21]

Deuteronomy also taught that the Law was to be Wisdom of the chosen people, that the Law would make them wise (Deuteronomy 4.6).  The book of Proverbs says that it is Wisdom herself who makes her disciples wise (Proverbs 9.1-6).  Wisdom must have been part of the older faith. [22]

All these three – visions of the Lord, the host of heaven, and Wisdom – feature in the accounts of Josiahs purge: Enoch says that the priests in the temple lost their vision because they abandoned Wisdom, and the account in 2 Kings 23 describes how the certain houses in the temple were destroyed which had belonged to cult prostitutes.  Exactly the same Hebrew letters can be read as holy ones, angels. [23]  What Josiah probably destroyed were the places for the angels, just as he destroyed the Asherah which was the symbol of Wisdom, the Queen of Heaven.  Isaiah saw the Lord among the angels, and he said he had seen the Lord of Hosts in the temple (Isaiah 6.1-5).  Deuteronomy does not mention angels.

Another way to reconstruct the older faith is to compare certain Old Testament texts with the parallel accounts elsewhere.  To take just one example, let us compare the account of the creation in Genesis 1 with other accounts in ancient texts.  According to Genesis, on Day One, God said Let there be light and then separated light from darkness.  Now in the pattern of temple symbolism, the six days of creation corresponded to the six stages by which Moses erected the tabernacle: thus Day One corresponded to the holy of holies, the second day to the veil of the tabernacle, the third day to the table for the shewbread and so forth.  Whatever we read about Day One will have been a secret of the holy of holies, accessible only to the high priests. [24]  In Genesis we are told nothing except that God created light and separated it from darkness.  The Book of Jubilees, however, another text found among the Dead Sea Scrolls and preserved by the ancient church in Ethiopia, gives a fuller account of Day One, and thus of the holy of holies.  On Day One the Lord created the angel spirits who serve before him, and the ranks of the angels are listed (Jubilees 2.2).  A similar list appears in the Song of the Three Young Men in the fiery furnace, which is found in the Greek version of Daniel 3, but not in the Hebrew.  The young men call on all creation to praise the Lord, beginning with a detailed account of the angels described in Jubilees as the works of Day One.  It is not until almost half way through their song that they call on the works of the visible creation to offer praise.  The readers of the Book of Jubilees and the readers of the Greek Daniel knew that the angels had been the work of Day One – but we do not learn this from Genesis.  It comes as no surprise, though, that the angels were located in the holy of holies, which is where Isaiah saw the heavenly host.  Presumably, knowledge of the angels had been a part of what Josiah sought to eliminate.  Deuteronomy does not mention angels.

Deuteronomy does, however, warn against the secret things, presumably the knowledge of the holy of holies.  The secret things belong to the Lord our God (Deuteronomy 29.29).  Deuteronomy does not deny that such secret things exist, but all that was necessary was to obey the Law and keep the revealed commandments [25].  The affairs of the holy of holies were the exclusive preserve of the high priests.  They alone had charge of the affairs of the altar and the holy of holies (Numbers 18.3) and they alone were permitted to look at the tabernacle furnishings (Numbers 4). [26]

The great angels had been known as the sons of God.  It is ironical that in the first of the two great poems appended to the Book of Deuteronomy, we are given the clearest picture of these sons of God.  When the Most High gave to the nations their inheritance, he fixed the bounds of the peoples according to the number of the sons of God. (Deuteronomy 32.8).  There was one guardian angel for each nation. [27]  The poem goes on to say that Jacob was allotted to the Lord, in other words, that the Lord, the God of Israel, was the Son of God Most High. The older religion had not been monotheism in the way that that word is usually understood today.  The Lord, the Son of God, had been the angel of Israel, or, as Isaiah said, the Holy One of Israel, since a holy one is an angel.  The Lord as the Son of God Most High became a sensitive matter, and so there were two versions of this text in Hebrew.  The Masoretic text on which most English translations are based, does not have sons of God at this point but sons of Israel, giving He fixed the bounds of the peoples according to the number of the sons of Israel.  The Old Greek and the Hebrew text found among the Dead Sea Scrolls, however, have sons of God, showing that God Most High apportioned the nations among his sons, and that the Lord, the God of Israel, was the Son of God Most High. [28]  The early Christians read the Old Testament in this way; whenever the Lord appeared, for example to Abraham, they recognized that it was an appearance of the Second Person of the Trinity, the Messiah, the Son of God. [29]

Once we know that the sons of God were an important part of the first temple religion, other Old Testament texts begin to appear in their original setting.  The holy of holies was the place of the angels, and so the rituals of the holy of holies must have been associated with the world of the angels. [30]  According the Books of Chronicles, there was in the holy of holies a golden throne in the form of a chariot of cherubim (1 Chronicles 28.18).  It was concealed behind the veil of the temple (2 Chronicles 3.14).  The account in 1 Kings, influenced by the Deuteronomists, mentions neither the chariot throne nor the veil, so these must have been important items in the older religion.  You will recall that the cherubim had been in the first temple but not the second, and were to be restored in the time of the time of the Messiah (Numbers Rabbah XV.10).  The Book of Chronicles also reveals that when Solomon was made king, he sat on this chariot throne, described as the throne of the Lord, and when he was enthroned, the people worshipped him (1 Chronicles 29.20-23).  The people worshipped the Lord, the king is the literal translation of 1 Chronicles 29.20.  The king was the Lord. [31]  He was enthroned in the holy of holies, and he was the Lord.  One of his titles, according to Isaiah, was Immanuel, God with us.  A human being had entered the holy of holies and become an angel.  Isaiah records the song of the angels in the holy of holies as the new angel is born as a son of God Unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given, and the government shall be upon his shoulder, and his name shall be called Wonderful Counsellor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace (Isaiah 9.6). [32]

The most complete picture of the first temple religion has been preserved in the Enoch texts. [33]  Ancient leaders such as Noah and Moses became angels whilst they still lived on earth (1 Enoch 89.1; 36).  Enoch was himself a high priest figure who entered the holy of holies and was transformed into an angel when he stood before the throne and was anointed and clothed by Michael.  He anointed me and he clothed me, and the appearance of that oil is greater than the greatest light, and it is like sweet dew and its fragrance is myrrh, and it is like the rays of the glittering sun.  And I looked at myself and I had become like one of the glorious ones… (2 Enoch 22).   You will recall that the anointing oil had disappeared in the time of Josiah, [34]and that there is almost nothing about Enoch in the Hebrew Bible even though he was a major figure among the Dead Sea Scrolls.

All the Enochic visions of the holy of holies must have been memories of the ancient rituals: the high priest taking petitions into the presence of God, the high priest looking out from the holy of holies and seeing all history spread before him so that he knew the future, the blood of the Righteous One being offered before the judgement could begin (1 Enoch 47).  This latter must have been a memory of the ancient rite of atonement, when the blood of the royal high priest was offered in the holy of holies, presumably using an animal substitute. [35]  Daniels vision of the Man ascending with clouds to the Ancient of Days says, literally, He was offered before him and then he was given dominion (Daniel 7).  Atonement is missing from Deuteronomy; the festival calendar in Deuteronomy 16 describes Passover, Pentecost and Tabernacles – but no Day of Atonement. [36]  The final form of the Pentateuch, compiled under the influence of Josiahs party, denies that atonement is even possible.  After Israel had sinned and made the golden calf, Moses went back up the mountain to offer himself as an atonement for their sin.  The Lord said the Moses Whoever has sinned against me, him will I blot out of my book (Exodus 32.33).  Why had Moses thought that his self sacrifice could have been an atonement for sin?  Presumably there had once been a time when such things were thought possible.

The older faith did not disappear.  The people who preserved the Enoch traditions kept the older faith, the community of the Damascus Covenant seem to have kept the older faith, those who wrote the Qumran Melchizedek text knew the date at which the older faith would be restored, and it emerged as the framework of early Christianity. [37]  Jesus was proclaimed in the Letter to the Hebrews as Melchizedek, [38] and John in his vision recorded in the Book of Revelation saw the ark restored to the temple (Revelation 11.19). [39]

Remnants of the older faith survived in many places, preserved by the descendants of those who fled from Josiahs purge.  There were the mysterious sons of Rechab whose story was told in the History of the Rechabites.  Beneath the layers of fantasy and folk tale in this widely known ancient text, we glimpse a group who described themselves as angels, and who had fled from Jerusalem after the time of Josiah.  Angels had released them from prison, and they had escaped to the desert, and crossed the great sea to a Paradise land of fruit trees, honey and abundant water.  Angels continued to inform them about events in their former world, and so they knew about the life of Jesus.  Zosimus, who visited the Rechabites, brought back stone tablets with an account of them.  Now Rechab is an interesting name; it can also mean a chariot, and so the angel sons of Rechab might have been the devotees of the chariot throne in the temple who fled from Jerusalem after Josiahs purge, and settled somewhere across a great sea.

Aramaic papyri found at Yeb in the south of Egypt describe a group who worshipped Yahu, another form of the Hebrew name of the Lord, but they also had divine names with feminine forms.  None of the names was Egyptian, so they were not the result of local syncretism.  They had built themselves a temple and had a priesthood – so they did not accept that there could be only one temple – and they corresponded with the high priest in Jerusalem.  Originally they had made no blood sacrifices, just offerings of wine, incense and cereals, like the refugees who fled to Egypt with Jeremiah.  Isaiah had prophesied that there would be an altar for the Lord in the midst of the land of Egypt (Isaiah 19.19), and five cities speaking the language of Canaan and worshipping the Lord of Hosts.

To the south of Yeb in Ethiopia are the Qemant, another people who have preserved the older faith.  They observe the Sabbath and the Old Testament food laws, they worship one God who can appear in human form, whom they name Adara, not unlike the Hebrew word for glorious one.  They acknowledge seven great angels and expect the Day of Judgement. They know of Abraham and of Adam.  They set up stone pillars and anoint them, and their holy men pray to Adara by sacred trees.  Some of them have been taken up to heaven and never seen again.  There is also the tradition that the ark was taken to Ethiopia before the destruction of the first temple.  The Christian monks in the Lake Tana monasteries still tell of the time before their people became Christian, and how they kept the ark for many centuries until it was taken to Axum.

In Western China, on the border with Tibet, are the Chiang Min, a people whose way of life was recorded at the beginning of the last century by a Christian missionary.  Their religion was identified as that of the Old Testament, before Josiahs purge.  That missionarys son is Prof. T. Torrance, the distinguished theologian in the University of Edinburgh, Scotland.  He wrote thus: I am convinced of my fathers main thesis…  The religious observances of the Chiang seem to derive from a period in Israels history … before the centralization of the cult had been carried out in Jerusalem and when high place worship was still prevalent.  The Chiang Min worship on a high place, with an altar of unhewn stones, a sacred tree behind the altar, and a white stone set between them.  God, whom they called Abba Malak, came to his people through the sacred tree.  They had remembered that Abba meant father, but had lost the meaning of Malak, which is clearly the Hebrew for angel.  They had a sacred rod in the form of a snake twisting round a pole, and they called their faith the white religion [40]

The religion of Abraham was long remembered as distinct from that of the Jews who also had teachings of Moses.  The Koran asked: Do you claim that Abraham, Ishmael, Isaac, Jacob and the tribes were all Jews or Christians? (2.140).  This religion of Abraham must have been the older faith, before Josiah and the Deuteronomists made Moses the more important figure.  The earliest account of the life of Muhammed was written by Ibn Ishaq in the middle of the eighth century AD, and so only about one hundred years after the time of Muhammed.  Before the prophet appeared, he wrote, four good men set out to seek the religion of their father Abraham, which they believed their people had corrupted.  They accepted neither Judaism nor Christianity, but sought the Hanifiya, who had kept the faith of Abraham.  One of them went as far as Syria, where a Christian monk told him there was nobody left who kept the faith of Abraham, but that a prophet would soon appear.

On the south west coast of India there are the so-called black Jews, a group who claim to have traveled to India after the destruction of the temple. [41]  There seem to have been trading links between Palestine and southern India in the time of the first temple, and early Christian writings say that the apostles Thomas and Bartholomew went to India as missionaries. [42]  Pantaenus, who became the head of the Christian academy in Alexandria in the late second century AD, had in his younger days traveled as a missionary to India.  There he found that Bartholomew had left them the Gospel of Matthew in Hebrew, showing that Bartholomew had preached to a Jewish community in India. (Eusebius, History of the Church 5.10).

Perhaps the most compelling evidence for large numbers of people leaving Jerusalem after Josiahs purge, is to be found in the Jerusalem Talmud, which is a compendium of Jewish teaching and traditions compiled around 400 AD. It describes how a large number of young priests sided with Nebuchadnezzar against Jerusalem, and then went to Arabia, where they were denied hospitality by the sons of Ishmael.  This is presented in the Talmud (Ta`anit 4.5) as the fulfilment of the prophecy in Isaiah 21.13-15, that those who had been in the Forest of Lebanon that is, the temple complex known as the House of the Forest of Lebanon (1 Kings 7.2), had gone to what Isaiah called the thickets of Arabia.  Jeremiah records that King Zedekiah was more afraid of the people who had deserted to the Babylonians than he was of the Babylonians themselves (Jeremiah 38.19).  The priests who supported the Babylonians against Jerusalem must have been those who could not accept what had been done to the temple by Josiah.  What they took with them to Arabia must have been the faith of the first temple, the religion Josiah had sought to purge.

We can never know for certain what it was that Josiah purged or why he did it.  No actual texts or records survive from that period, but even the stories as they have come down to us in various sources show that this was a time of major upheaval which was not forgotten.  A thousand years after the events themselves, even mainstream Jewish texts remembered that the temple had been drastically changed, that large numbers of people had left the land, and that the true temple would be only be restored in the time of the Messiah.



[1]

2 Kings 22:8-13 and 2 Chronicles 34:14-20, with Chronicles reporting the timing of the books discovery differently, six years into the reform. See Margaret Barker, The Great Angel: A Study of Israels Second God (London: SPCK, 1992), 12. Also Margaret Barker, The Older Testament: The Survival of Themes from the Ancient Royal Cult in Sectarian Judaism and Early Christianity (London: SPCK, 1987), 142-3.

[2]

Deuteronomy 12:1-5.

[3]

2 Kings 24:10-16, and 2 Kings 25:1-9.

[4]

Jeremiah 44:16-19.

[5]

See Margaret Barker, The Great High Priest: The Temple Roots of Christian Liturgy (London: T&T Clark, 2003), 234-36.

[6]

Barker, The Great High Priest, 246-47.

[7]

Barker, The Great Angel, 12-14. Barker,The Older Testament, 142-148.

[8]

Barker, The Great High Priest, 79, 82.

[9]

See Barker, The Older Testament, 8-80, and Margaret Barker, The Lost Prophet: The Book of Enoch and Its Influence on Christianity (London: SPCK, 1988).

[10]

Barker, The Older Testament, 59-61.

[11]

Barker, The Great High Priest, 244.

[12]

Daniel C. Peterson, Nephi and His Asherah: A Note on 1 Nephi 11:8-23, in Mormons, Scripture and the Ancient World: Studies in Honor of John L. Sorenson, ed. by Davis Bitton, 191-243 (Provo: FARMS, 1998), 212.  Also discussed in Kevin Barney, Do We Have a Mother in Heaven? 4-5, at http://www.fairlds.org/pubs/MotherInHeaven.pdf

[13]

Barker, The Great High Priest, 244.

[14]

Margaret Barker, The Revelation of Jesus Christ: Which God Gave to Him to Show to His Servants What Must Soon Take Place (Revelation 1.1).  (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 2000), 204-6.

[15]

Barker, The Great High Priest, 239-243.

[16]

Ibid. 244.

[17]

For further discussion of these accounts, see Hugh Nibley, Abraham in Egypt 2nd ed. Collected Works of Hugh Nibley, vol 14 (Provo and Salt Lake City: Deseret Book and FARMS, 200), 329-344, 372-375.

[18]

Barker, The Older Testament, 257.

[19]

Barker, The Great High Priest, 37-39. Also, Barker, The Revelation of Jesus Christ, 4-7.

[20]

Margaret Barker, On Earth as It Is In Heaven: Temple Symbolism in the New Testament, (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1995), 4-5.

[21]

Barker, The Great Angel, 13-15.  Barker, The Older Testament, 127.

[22]

Barker, The Great Angel 13-15. Barker, The Older Testament, 81-99, 147.  Also Barker, The Great High Priest, 228-261.

[23]

Barker, The Great High Priest, 149.

[24]

Ibid., 135.

[25]

Ibid., 224-225.

[26]

For details of the Holy of Holies, Barker, The Great High Priest, 146-187.

[27]

Barker, The Great Angel, 5-6.

[28]

Ibid.

[29]

Ibid., 190-5

[30]

Barker, The Great High Priest, 108-9.

[31]

Margaret Barker, The Gate of Heaven: The History and Symbolism of the Temple in Jerusalem (London: SPCK, 1991), 134-5. Barker, The Great Angel, 8-9. Barker, The Revelation of Jesus Christ, 36-7.

[32]

Barker, The Great High Priest, 242.

[33]

Barker, The Older Testament, 12-15, 69. Barker, The Lost Prophet, 105-6.

[34]

Barker, The Great High Priest, 78.

[35]

Ibid., 51-55.

[36]

Barker, The Great High Priest, 106.

[37]

Ibid., 34-41.

[38]

Barker, The Risen Lord, 67.

[39]

Ibid., 52.

[40]

Torrance, Rev. T., Chinas Missionaries: Ancient Israelites (Thynne & Co. 1937)

[41]

Nathan Katz, Who Are the Jews of India? (University of California Press, 2000). Also see http://www.faqs.org/faqs/judaism/FAQ/07-Jews-As-Nation/section-10.html

[42]

For example, http://www.xlweb.com/heritage/asian/christianity-conference.htm


 


Jeremiah 2-6

 

September 21, 2006

 

 

 

(Jeremiah 1:4-19.) – Jeremiah’s call as a Prophet

 

4 Then the word of the LORD came unto me, saying,

 

5 Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee, and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations.

 

6 Then said I, Ah, Lord GOD! behold, I cannot speak: for I am a child.

 

7 ¶ But the LORD said unto me, Say not, I am a child: for thou shalt go to all that I shall send thee, and whatsoever I command thee thou shalt speak.

 

8 Be not afraid of their faces: for I am with thee to deliver thee, saith the LORD.

 

9 Then the LORD put forth his hand, and touched my mouth. And the LORD said unto me, Behold, I have put my words in thy mouth.

 

10 See, I have this day set thee over the nations and over the kingdoms, to root out, and to pull down, and to destroy, and to throw down, to build, and to plant.

 

11 ¶ Moreover the word of the LORD came unto me, saying, Jeremiah, what seest thou? And I said, I see a rod of an almond tree.

 

12 Then said the LORD unto me, Thou hast well seen: for I will hasten my word to perform it.

 

13 And the word of the LORD came unto me the second time, saying, What seest thou? And I said, I see a seething pot; and the face thereof is toward the north.

 

14 Then the LORD said unto me, Out of the north an evil shall break forth upon all the inhabitants of the land.

 

15 For, lo, I will call all the families of the kingdoms of the north, saith the LORD; and they shall come, and they shall set every one his throne at the entering of the gates of Jerusalem, and against all the walls thereof round about, and against all the cities of Judah.

 

16 And I will utter my judgments against them touching all their wickedness, who have forsaken me, and have burned incense unto other gods, and worshipped the works of their own hands.

 

17 ¶ Thou therefore gird up thy loins, and arise, and speak unto them all that I command thee: be not dismayed at their faces, lest I confound thee before them.

 

18 For, behold, I have made thee this day a defenced city, and an iron pillar, and brasen walls against the whole land, against the kings of Judah, against the princes thereof, against the priests thereof, and against the people of the land.

 

19 And they shall fight against thee; but they shall not prevail against thee; for I am with thee, saith the LORD, to deliver thee.

 

 

There were, of course, people living on the earth after this time who held the Melchizedek Priesthood—including the sons of Aaron, the seventy elders of Israel, and the prophets who were called thereafter—but the keys, the right of presidency, including the right to confer the higher priesthood, were taken from the generality of the people. "All Priesthood is Melchizedek," Joseph Smith taught, "but there are different portions or degrees of it. That portion which brought Moses to speak with God face to face was taken away; but that which brought the ministry of angels remained. All the prophets had the Melchizedek Priesthood and were ordained by God himself."21 That is, prophets after Moses like Elijah, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and Lehi were called by God and received the Melchizedek Priesthood and its keys by special dispensation. We are instructed in a modern revelation that Nathan and "others of the prophets who had the keys of this [sealing] power" officiated in sacred saving ordinances (D&C 132:39) in Old Testament times after the Melchizedek Priesthood was taken from the body of ancient Israel.

 

(Robert L. Millet, Selected Writings of Robert L. Millet: Gospel Scholars Series [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 2000], 284.)

 

 

The almond tree was the 1st tree in the spring to bud and blossom in the spring; it was considered the “watcher”.

 

BIBLE DICTIONARY
Almond tree

In full blossom in Palestine during January or February; the leaves appear in March; and the fruit is ripe by April or May (Ex. 25: 33-34; Ex. 37: 19-20; Num. 17: 8; Eccl. 12: 5).

 

They can’t kill Jeremiah, but he suffers greatly, verses 17-19.

 

 

Pot = Jerusalem, the pot faced north where the armies of Babylon will come in the future to destroy Jerusalem.

 

Israel burned incense to other gods, in a form of prayer.  They ignored praying to Jehovah, the only one who could save them. 

 

The book is set up by topics.

 

Chapters 2-6 – written in the time of Josiah

Chapters 7-20 – written in the time of Jehoiakim

Chapters 21-26 – written in the time of Zedekiah

 

The temple sermon in chapter 7 may have been the same talk found in chapter 26.

 

The marriage theme of chapter 2 is popular with Jeremiah; change the word kindness to loyalty.

 

 

I AM WITH THEE, TO DELIVER THEE (JEREMIAH 1-20)

 

DAVID ROLPH SEELY

 

When Jeremiah received his call, the Lord delivered to him his word, both symbolically when he touched his young mouth, and also literally when he spoke with Jeremiah and revealed to him his will. From then on Jeremiah could deliver with authority the phrase "Thus saith the Lord" with the attendant message.

 

Along with the word, the Lord gave Jeremiah two symbolic visions when he called him. fn In the first vision (Jer. 1:11-12) the Lord asked Jeremiah to look at the rod of an almond tree—in Hebrew, saqed—and delivered his message to Jeremiah through a pun: "I will hasten—soqed—my word to perform it" (Jer. 1:11-12). This symbol would remind Jeremiah that the words he would be asked to deliver would indeed come to pass. The second vision contained the essence of the Lord's warning to Judah. Jeremiah looked at a "seething pot" tipping from the north southward, fn presumably about to spill out its contents. The Lord explained that it would be from the north that the promised destruction would come upon the cities of Judah on account of their forsaking the covenant. The Lord declared, "I will utter my judgments against them touching all their wickedness, who have forsaken me, and have burned incense unto other gods, and worshipped the works of their own hands" (Jer. 1:16). Although Babylon is located due east of Judah, the Babylonian armies would march up the Euphrates River Valley and around the fertile crescent through Syria and Lebanon, rather than taking the almost impossible route across the Arabian desert, and they would thus invade Judah from the north (see Map 10, LDS Bible).

 

Needless to say such a message would not be a popular one. The Lord informed Jeremiah that he would set him up to "root out, and to pull down, and to destroy, and to throw down" (Jer. 1:10). What the Lord demanded he tell the inhabitants of the land would be difficult; thus he exhorted, "Thou therefore gird up thy loins, and arise, and speak unto them all that I command thee: be not dismayed at their faces, lest I confound thee before them" (Jer. 1:17). He told Jeremiah he would find himself pitted "against the kings of Judah, against the princes thereof, against the priests thereof, and against the people" (Jer. 1:18)—in short, against everyone. "They shall fight against thee," the Lord said, "but they shall not prevail against thee; for I am with thee, saith the Lord, to deliver thee" (Jer. 1:19).

 

Throughout Jeremiah's forty-year ministry, his task would require of him almost more than he could bear. His ministry would require courage, humility, perseverance, patience, charity, and an uncompromising intolerance of sin, all of which would result in a spiritual maturity that he eloquently and poetically expressed in his writings. Jeremiah would suffer rejection, persecution, loneliness, isolation, and injustice. He would be arrested, threatened, beaten, and imprisoned. Yet in the face of all adversity, he maintained a dynamic and meaningful relationship with the Lord to whom he freely expressed the depths of his emotions—his grief, anger, and despair—as well as his spiritual triumphs. At times the Lord responded, sometimes sharply and sometimes gently; at other times he listened. But as he promised, he was always there.

 

In the collection of prophecies in Jeremiah 1 through 19 are only two chronological points of reference. The first is found in Jeremiah 3:6, "in the days of Josiah," and the other can be deduced for the Temple Sermon in chapter 7, assuming that this sermon is the same as that alluded to in chapter 26 in the biographical material. In chapter 26 the date of this sermon is given "in the beginning of the reign of Jehoiakim the son of Josiah" (Jer. 26:1), which would be 609 B.C. fn From these two notations, as well as thematic unity and other internal evidence pointing to known historical events, chapters 1 through 6 appear to contain prophecies largely from the early part of Jeremiah's ministry in the time of Josiah (627-609). Chapters 7-20 contain prophecies from the time of Jehoiakim (609-598). The assumption that these chapters can be treated as a unit is supported by an echo of the womb imagery from Jeremiah's call (Jer. 1:5) in his lament (Jer. 20:14-18), perhaps functioning as a rhetorical device indicating the unity of chapters 1 through 20. fn In contrast to the uncertainties of dating and organization, the themes and messages of these prophecies are for the most part clear and straightforward.

 

Prophecies from the Time of Josiah (Jer. 2-6)

 

In chapters 2 and 3 the Lord revealed to Jeremiah the covenantal lawsuit he was bringing against his people on account of their disobedience. The legal imagery of the Lord charging his people—a covenantal lawsuit—is a common feature in biblical prophecy, and good examples can be found in Deuteronomy 25, Hosea 4, Isaiah 1, Micah 6, and Psalm 50.

 

The stipulations of the Mosaic covenant—the Law—were from the beginning inseparably connected with specific promises of blessings and curses, depending on obedience to the commandments. These blessings and curses were specified in Deuteronomy 27 and 28. This connection between obedience and blessing is well known to Latter-day Saint readers, as it is repeated throughout the Book of Mormon in regard to the promised land: "Inasmuch as ye shall keep my commandments, ye shall prosper" (1 Ne. 2:20; 4:14). The corresponding curse is likewise expressed, "But inasmuch as ye will not keep my commandments ye shall be cut off from my presence" (2 Ne. 1:20). The eternal nature of this principle is reiterated in modern revelation: "There is a law, irrevocably decreed in heaven before the foundations of this world, upon which all blessings are predicated—And when we obtain any blessing from God, it is by obedience to that law upon which it is predicated" (D&C 130:20-21).

 

The specific punishments pronounced on Israel for disobedience to the Law are spelled out in detail in Deuteronomy 28. They include pestilence, drought, and ultimately destruction by the sword and scatering: fn "The Lord shall send upon thee cursing, vexation, and rebuke, in all that thou settest thine hand unto for to do, until thou be destroyed, and until thou perish quickly; because of the wickedness of thy doings, whereby thou hast forsaken me" (Deut. 28:20). "And the Lord shall scatter thee among all people, from the one end of the earth even unto the other; . . . And among these nations shalt thou find no ease, neither shall the sole of thy foot have rest: but the Lord shall give thee there a trembling heart, and failing of eyes, and sorrow of mind" (Deut. 28:64-65).

 

In Jeremiah 2 and 3 the covenant lawsuit, like much of the biblical imagery of covenant, is based on one of the most tender and moving of biblical images—the covenant between God and his people as a marriage. The Lord portrays Israel as a young bride who was espoused in the wilderness and married at Sinai. This imagery shows remarkable similarity both in general as well as in specific phrases with the language of Hosea 1 through 3 (which is followed by the imagery of a lawsuit in Hosea 4). The imagery of the covenant as a marriage was carried on in Ezekiel 16 and in the New Testament, where it is found in the parable of the ten virgins (Matt. 25:1-13; see also Luke 14:16-24; Rev. 19:7, 9).

 

The Lord led his young bride "out of the land of Egypt . . . through the wilderness, through a land of deserts and of pits, through a land of drought, and of the shadow of death, through a land that no man passed through, and where no man dwelt" (Jer. 2:6). He brought her to "a plentiful country, to eat the fruit thereof and the goodness thereof" (Jer. 2:7). But when Israel arrived she "defiled" the land and followed other gods. The charge against Israel is thus infidelity—in the imagery of the covenant as marriage, it is adultery. As demonstrated by the reign of Manasseh, seeking after foreign gods was also an integral part of foreign political alliances, which included accepting their gods and their images into the temple. The Lord placed the blame for such apostasy on the priests ("they that handle the law"), the shepherds ("pastors," perhaps a reference here to the kings and princes indicted in Jer. 1:18) fn, and the prophets (Jer. 2:8).

 

In addition to portraying the Lord as husband, Jeremiah portrayed him as father. He referred to Israel as the "firstfruits" (Jer. 2:3), perhaps an allusion to Exodus 4:22, in which the Lord called Israel his firstborn son. The imagery of the Lord as father calling his son Israel out of Egypt is also found in Hosea 11:1-4. This image of the fatherhood of God is continued in Jeremiah 2:27, in which the Lord accused his children of seeking for their paternity elsewhere—in a "stock," a reference to the wood used to make an idol or perhaps the wooden Asherah, and a "stone," probably referring to the stone images that played a part in Canaanite religion. In Jeremiah 3:9 the marriage and paternity images are combined as these idols become the partners of adultery. The Lord laments, "My people have committed two evils; they have forsaken me the fountain of living waters, and hewed them out cisterns, broken cisterns, that can hold no water" (Jer. 2:13). "Living water" is a phrase used to refer to running water, a spring, which would be pure. Jeremiah later explicitly used this image to describe the Lord: "They have forsaken the Lord, the fountain of living waters" (Jer. 17:13). The Savior in his ministry used this image in reference to the power of the Atonement as a "well of water springing up into everlasting life" (John 4:10-14).

 

Not only has Israel left her husband but in terms of worshiping other gods she has become an insatiable harlot. This theme is well developed in Hosea 1 through 3 as well as Ezekiel 16. Under the Law of Moses the punishment for adultery was death (Lev. 20:10), a sentence that hangs over Israel. The Lord reminded Israel: "If a man put away his wife, and she go from him, and become another man's, shall he return unto her again? . . . but thou hast played the harlot with many lovers" (Jer. 3:1). Under the law a divorce is in order. Yet this is no ordinary husband who instead pleads, "Return again to me, saith the Lord" (Jer. 3:1). As an illustration of the potential disaster of apostate behavior, the Lord reminds Judah of her sister Israel, the Northern Kingdom. Because of her adultery the Lord gave her a bill of divorce, and the result was destruction and deportation by the Assyrians in 721 B.C. "Yet for all this her treacherous sister Judah hath not turned unto me with her whole heart, but feignedly, saith the Lord" (Jer. 3:10).

 

Jeremiah's assignment was to plead for the Lord: "Return, thou backsliding Israel, saith the Lord; and I will not cause mine anger to fall upon you: for I am merciful, saith the Lord, and I will not keep anger forever" (Jer. 3:12). "Return, ye backsliding children, and I will heal your backslidings" (Jer. 3:22). What the Lord envisioned is expressed in terms of marriage and fatherhood—a reuniting of the spouses, the gathering and restoration of scattered Israel and Judah, and the return of the children of Israel who will call, "My father; and shalt not turn away from me" (Jer. 3:14-19).

 

In Jeremiah 4 through 6 the Lord continued the lawsuit, after offering Judah the chance to return to the marriage, pronouncing judgment on an unrepentant, adulterous Judah. The Lord decreed, just as in Jeremiah's call, "I will bring evil from the north, and a great destruction. . . . to make thy land desolate; and thy cities shall be laid waste, without an inhabitant" (Jer. 4:6-7). The destruction from the north is also referred to in Jeremiah 5:15-18 and 6:22-23). The vivid terror of destruction can be felt in Jeremiah's description of the feelings he felt as he witnessed the terrible vision: "My bowels, my bowels! I am pained at my very heart; my heart maketh a noise in me; I cannot hold my peace, because thou hast heard, O my soul, the sound of the trumpet, the alarm of war" (Jer. 4:19). "For my people is foolish, they have not known me; they are sottish children, and they have none understanding: they are wise to do evil, but to do good they have no knowledge" (Jer. 4:22). Destruction is described in cosmic terms as Jeremiah reported, "I beheld the earth, and, lo, it was without form, and void [a reversal of creation]; and the heavens, and they had no light" (Jer. 4:23). The Lord taunted his adulterous bride: "And when thou art spoiled, what wilt thou do? Though thou clothest thyself with crimson, though thou deckest thee with ornaments of gold, though thou rentest thy face with painting, in vain shalt thou make thyself fair; thy lovers will despise thee, they will seek thy life" (Jer. 4:30).

 

The threat of destruction was tempered by the promise that the destruction would not be total: "Nevertheless in those days, saith the Lord, I will not make a full end with you," but a remnant would be sent into exile where, just as they had forsaken the Lord and worshiped strange gods in their own land, they would "serve strangers in a land that is not yours" (Jer. 5:18-19).

 

Once again the blame was placed not just on the corrupt political and religious authorities but on everyone: "A wonderful and horrible thing is committed in the land; the prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests bear rule by their means; and my people love to have it so" (Jer. 5:30-31).

 

Prophecies from the Time of Jehoiakim (Jer. 4-20)

 

Because only a few of the diverse themes and images of the many prophecies recorded in Jeremiah 7 through 20 can be discussed here, I will concentrate on four of them: first, Jeremiah's Temple Sermon in chapter 7, which contains a comprehensive overview of what the Lord perceived to be the problems in Judah and the proposed solutions; second, three symbolic acts in which the word of the Lord was dramatized; third, a prophecy of the scattering and the gathering; and fourth, Jeremiah's laments, which are interspersed throughout these chapters and reveal the depths of Jeremiah's personal struggles and suffering as he went about the work of the Lord.

 

 

(Kent P. Jackson, ed., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 4: 1 Kings to Malachi [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1993], 214.)

 

 

The Lord – “I don’t understand the evil you find in me?”

 

 

God is the husband and Israel is the bride. Early in the marriage Israel was holy and faithful.

 

(Jeremiah 2:2-9.)

 

2 Go and cry in the ears of Jerusalem, saying, Thus saith the LORD; I remember thee, the kindness of thy youth, the love of thine espousals, when thou wentest after me in the wilderness, in a land that was not sown.

 

3 Israel was holiness unto the LORD, and the firstfruits of his increase: all that devour him shall offend; evil shall come upon them, saith the LORD.

 

4 Hear ye the word of the LORD, O house of Jacob, and all the families of the house of Israel:

 

5 ¶ Thus saith the LORD, What iniquity have your fathers found in me, that they are gone far from me, and have walked after vanity, and are become vain?

 

6 Neither said they, Where is the LORD that brought us up out of the land of Egypt, that led us through the wilderness, through a land of deserts and of pits, through a land of drought, and of the shadow of death, through a land that no man passed through, and where no man dwelt?

 

7 And I brought you into a plentiful country, to eat the fruit thereof and the goodness thereof; but when ye entered, ye defiled my land, and made mine heritage an abomination.

 

8 The priests said not, Where is the LORD? and they that handle the law knew me not: the pastors also transgressed against me, and the prophets prophesied by Baal, and walked after things that do not profit.

 

9 ¶ Wherefore I will yet plead with you, saith the LORD, and with your children's children will I plead.

 

 

Verse 5 - What was wicked in me as your husband that you went to others?

 

Verse 9 – plead = conflict, bring a charge between 2.people

 

(Jeremiah 2:10-13.)

 

10 For pass over the isles of Chittim, and see; and send unto Kedar, and consider diligently, and see if there be such a thing.

 

11 Hath a nation changed their gods, which are yet no gods? but my people have changed their glory for that which doth not profit.

 

12 Be astonished, O ye heavens, at this, and be horribly afraid, be ye very desolate, saith the LORD.

 

13 For my people have committed two evils; they have forsaken me the fountain of living waters, and hewed them out cisterns, broken cisterns, that can hold no water.

 

 

What other neighbor nation changes Gods like you do?  They are all faithful to those false gods even if those gods give them nothing!  I got you out of bondage, and gave you a plentiful land, I am your protector.

 

2 Evils:  1. Jehovah – Fountain of Living Water, Israel has forsaken these waters.

             2.  False gods – Broken cisterns that don’t hold water and stink.

 

 

You get a sense that the Lord is dumbfounded by their choices.

 

 Verse 14 - Servant = slaves.  The people in Israel have never been slaves, trust me, and don’t trust Egypt or Babylon.

 

Something that doesn’t profit, He brings this up several times.

 

I have been a very good husband to you, why do you switch.

 

 

You have an outward appearance of Jehovah worship, yet you still worship other gods.  There isn’t an inward change in your heart toward Jehovah.  Why are you behaving this way?  What evil do you find in me?

 

(Jeremiah 2:14-23.)

 

14 ¶ Is Israel a servant? is he a homeborn slave? why is he spoiled?

 

15 The young lions roared upon him, and yelled, and they made his land waste: his cities are burned without inhabitant.

 

16 Also the children of Noph and Tahapanes have broken the crown of thy head.

 

17 Hast thou not procured this unto thyself, in that thou hast forsaken the LORD thy God, when he led thee by the way?

 

18 And now what hast thou to do in the way of Egypt, to drink the waters of Sihor? or what hast thou to do in the way of Assyria, to drink the waters of the river?

 

19 Thine own wickedness shall correct thee, and thy backslidings shall reprove thee: know therefore and see that it is an evil thing and bitter, that thou hast forsaken the LORD thy God, and that my fear is not in thee, saith the Lord GOD of hosts.

 

20 ¶ For of old time I have broken thy yoke, and burst thy bands; and thou saidst, I will not transgress; when upon every high hill and under every green tree thou wanderest, playing the harlot.

 

21 Yet I had planted thee a noble vine, wholly a right seed: how then art thou turned into the degenerate plant of a strange vine unto me?

 

22 For though thou wash thee with nitre, and take thee much soap, yet thine iniquity is marked before me, saith the Lord GOD.

 

23 How canst thou say, I am not polluted, I have not gone after Baalim? see thy way in the valley, know what thou hast done: thou art a swift dromedary traversing her ways;

 

Verse 19-23 - Josiah’s reforms aren’t going to work; Israel continues to backslide.  Israel broke the covenant of Shechem.

 

Verse 22 - Israel is going through all of the rituals but isn’t becoming clean.  For ordinances to affect people there needs to be a broken heart and a contrite spirit, we must change on the inside.  Laman and Lemuel are perfect examples of this, like all of Jerusalem.

 

(1 Nephi 17:20-22.)

 

20 And thou art like unto our father, led away by the foolish imaginations of his heart; yea, he hath led us out of the land of Jerusalem, and we have wandered in the wilderness for these many years; and our women have toiled, being big with child; and they have borne children in the wilderness and suffered all things, save it were death; and it would have been better that they had died before they came out of Jerusalem than to have suffered these afflictions.

 

21 Behold, these many years we have suffered in the wilderness, which time we might have enjoyed our possessions and the land of our inheritance; yea, and we might have been happy.

 

22 And we know that the people who were in the land of Jerusalem were a righteous people; for they kept the statutes and judgments of the Lord, and all his commandments, according to the law of Moses; wherefore, we know that they are a righteous people; and our father hath judged them, and hath led us away because we would hearken unto his words; yea, and our brother is like unto him. And after this manner of language did my brethren murmur and complain against us.

 

Righteous = Right with the law.  Obedience to the law gets you to do actions which are right in the Lords eyes.  Laman thinks just by doing that it will be enough it’s an outward show of obedience (I am righteous).  The purpose of the law pointing to Jehovah doesn’t cross their mind.  If Jehovah is pacified towards us then that is enough, then we can go about our business as usual.  There isn’t an inner holiness or spirituality found in such a person.

 

 

(1 Nephi 17:45.)

 

45 Ye are swift to do iniquity but slow to remember the Lord your God. Ye have seen an angel, and he spake unto you; yea, ye have heard his voice from time to time; and he hath spoken unto you in a still small voice, but ye were past feeling, that ye could not feel his words; wherefore, he has spoken unto you like unto the voice of thunder, which did cause the earth to shake as if it were to divide asunder.

 

 

They are not a product of Josiah but of Jehoiakim who 10 years later turned back to the ways of Manasseh.  They think they are OK; Jeremiah tries to show they aren’t.

 

Today, we go to the temple, church, do our home teaching, read our scriptures etc, but our hearts aren’t turned to Christ.  We don’t like being reminded of our short comings during Conference.  It’s an outward show without an inward change of heart.

 

(Jeremiah 3:22-25.)

 

22 Return, ye backsliding children, and I will heal your backslidings. Behold, we come unto thee; for thou art the LORD our God.

 

23 Truly in vain is salvation hoped for from the hills, and from the multitude of mountains: truly in the LORD our God is the salvation of Israel.

 

24 For shame hath devoured the labour of our fathers from our youth; their flocks and their herds, their sons and their daughters.

 

25 We lie down in our shame, and our confusion covereth us: for we have sinned against the LORD our God, we and our fathers, from our youth even unto this day, and have not obeyed the voice of the LORD our God.

 

 

There isn’t any hope for them, they are so caught up in their sins that they can’t escape, and they won’t stop sinning, even when they know better.

 

(Jeremiah 2:24-30.)

 

24 A wild ass used to the wilderness, that snuffeth up the wind at her pleasure; in her occasion who can turn her away? all they that seek her will not weary themselves; in her month they shall find her.

 

25 Withhold thy foot from being unshod, and thy throat from thirst: but thou saidst, There is no hope: no; for I have loved strangers, and after them will I go.

 

26 As the thief is ashamed when he is found, so is the house of Israel ashamed; they, their kings, their princes, and their priests, and their prophets,

 

27 Saying to a stock, Thou art my father; and to a stone, Thou hast brought me forth: for they have turned their back unto me, and not their face: but in the time of their trouble they will say, Arise, and save us.

 

28 But where are thy gods that thou hast made thee? let them arise, if they can save thee in the time of thy trouble: for according to the number of thy cities are thy gods, O Judah.

 

29 Wherefore will ye plead with me? ye all have transgressed against me, saith the LORD.

 

30 In vain have I smitten your children; they received no correction: your own sword hath devoured your prophets, like a destroying lion.

 

 

Verse 25 - Hebrew = “We are free to roam and will come no more unto thee” Israel like an unfaithful wife who will do as she pleases with whomever she pleases, even after being provided for throughout her existence.  I have given you everything, what do you expect to get?

 

Going through the rituals is enough – I can’t change, there is no hope for me.

 

 

 

Why Josiah’s Reforms did not work

 

 

  1. They think they are righteous, performing outward rituals without an inward change (the Mormon game) No change in their heart.

 

  1. They lost hope they can change

 

  1. They have no desire to repent, past feeling, Josiah wants his people to change

 

  1. It’s not wrong what I’m doing

 

  1. They don’t fear the Lord, they don’t think of the consequences of their actions

 

What are the shows or movies you watch?  Are you culturally bound to the world?  See Elder Ballard’s talk on media.

 

The Effects of Television
M. Russell Ballard
Ensign, May 1989, 79

I am sure we all appreciate the inspired and timely messages we have heard. They have been translated simultaneously into twenty-nine languages, many of which have been broadcast via satellite and television to millions of people.

The wonder of television causes me to believe that Philo T. Farnsworth, back in 1927, must surely have been inspired of the Lord to develop this remarkable medium of communication. As you know, Brother Farnsworth was a member of the Church. Applying his scientific skills, he brought to the world this marvelous invention, which I believe is to be used for the primary purpose of furthering the work of the Lord.

In the past sixty years, television has become a major industry in the world. It is estimated that more than 750 million television sets are owned by people living in 160 countries. Approximately 2.5 billion people view television broadcasting every day.

Most of us recognize both the many benefits and the many challenges that come from television in our modern, fast-paced world. Some of the benefits, besides listening to the teaching of the gospel, we can receive by merely touching a button include receiving instant reports of local and world events and updates on weather; watching fantasy; exploring geography; living history; enjoying good theater, dance, and music; and experiencing culture from almost every country in the world.

For these kinds of programs we praise the industry. Unfortunately, however, far too much programming is not wholesome and uplifting but is violent, degrading, and destructive to moral values. This kind of television offends the Spirit of the Lord; therefore, I express a word of warning and caution about such programming.

Good families face very significant challenges in controlling the use of television and videotapes in their homes. I agree with Dr. Victor B. Cline when he said, "I am convinced by a vast amount of research that the images, fantasies, and models which we are repeatedly exposed to in advertisements, entertainment, novels, motion pictures, and other works of art can and do . . . affect the self-image and, later, the behavior of nearly all young people and adults too" (address at Tidewater Assembly on Family Life, Norfolk, Virginia).

On another occasion, Dr. Cline said that the mental diet is as important as the nutritional diet. "The amount of violence a child sees at 7 predicts how violent he will be at 17, 27 and 37. . . . Children's minds are like banks--whatever you put in, you get back 10 years later with interest." He said that violent television teaches children, step-by-step, "how to commit violent acts, and it desensitizes them to the horror of such behavior and to the feelings of victims." Dr. Cline said that America is suffering from "an explosion of interpersonal violence like we have never seen before. . . . The violence is because of violence in our entertainment" ("Therapist Says Children Who View TV Violence Tend to Become Violent," Deseret News, 24 Mar. 1989, sec. B, p. 2). 

Some may be surprised to know that in the average American home, the television set is on just under seven hours each day, and more than sixty-six million Americans who are under age nineteen live in these homes. A recent magazine article included this statement: "Once, television's 'window on the world' mirrored solid family ties, heroes drawn in bright primary colors, and a society of permanence and belonging. Now . . . it's clear that our TV shows are showing quite a different picture. In fact, it's arguable that television is no longer a mere window on our world but the value-setter itself" (Another View of the Window [Triangle Publications, n.d.], p. 3).

Allow me to share highlights of some alarming findings from research studies conducted over the past eight to ten years on the effects of television when watched more than two hours a day without the careful selection of programs.

1. Before television, children played together more often, played outdoors more, spent more time being creative and inventive, and read more. Parents and children spent more time together, talked together more, shared more joint projects and chores, and ate more meals together. (See Ellen B. De Franco, TV On-Off: Better Family Use of Television [Santa Monica, Calif., Goodyear Publishing Co., 1980], pp. 5-6.)

2. Television is psychologically addictive (see TV On-Off, p. 4).

3. Television is a physically passive activity and generally discourages creative play. It can encourage a certain kind of passivity which leads to a "show me or entertain me" orientation by children. (See Television and Behavior [Rockville, Md.: National Institute of Mental Health, 1987], pp. 45-46.)

4. Television tends to overpower and desensitize a child's sense of sympathy for suffering (see Kate Moody, Growing Up on Television: The TV Effect--A Report to Parents [New York: Times Books, 1980], pp. 91-92).

5. Some children lose the ability to learn from reality because life's experiences are more complicated than those seen on the screen. Teachers and parents, therefore, suffer by comparison when they cannot solve problems in thirty to sixty minutes. (See Ben Logan and Kate Moody, eds.,Television Awareness Training: The Viewer's Guide for Family and Community [Nashville: Abingdon, 1979], p. 43.)

Volumes of research data show the detrimental effects of television, but I just say that television and videocassette viewing by youngsters has a significant impact on their behavior. We must not take lightly the confession of a recently executed killer on the impact pornography and violence in media had on his life. The Apostle Paul warned that men can become "past feeling . . . [giving] themselves over unto lasciviousness, to work all uncleanness with greediness" (Ephesians 4:19). In Proverbs we read, "As [a man] thinketh . . . , so is he" (23:7). A mind exposed to violence and immorality cannot escape the negative impact of such exposure. 

President Gordon B. Hinckley said:

"'A survey of influential television writers and executives in Hollywood has shown that they are far less religious than the general public. . . . While nearly all of the 104 Hollywood professionals inter viewed had a religious background, 45 percent now say they have no religion, and of the other 55 percent only 7 percent say they attend a religious service as much as once a month. 

"'This group has had a major role in shaping the shows whose themes and stars have become staples in our popular culture' (Los Angeles Times, 19 Feb. 1983, part 2, page 5). 

"These are the people [TV script writers and executives] who, through the medium of entertainment, are educating us in the direction of their own standards, which in many cases are diametrically opposed to the standards of the gospel" [in Conference Report, Oct. 1983, p. 67; or Ensign, Nov. 1983, pp. 45-46].

A Time magazine article states:

"This upsurge in openness has been linked by some critics to cutbacks in the network departments of standards and practices--the censors who review shows and commercials for offensive . . . material. . . . The ranks of these watchdogs were drastically reduced: from a peak of 75 to 80 per network during the 1970s to 35 to 40 today at ABC and fewer than 30 each at CBS and NBC" ("Where Are the Censors?" 12 Dec. 1988, p. 95). Televised violence has become so pervasive that the average high school student by graduation has seen eighteen thousand murders and many other acts of violence and sin. This being the case today, more parental review and monitoring is needed to protect our families from the current flood of TV violence and the effect it has on us.

Randal A. Wright in his book Families in Danger wrote:

"It is possible to trace the decline in American television from its original programs. As an example, a prime-time (7:00 to 10:00 P.M.) schedule check going back thirty years found that in 1955, no violent, crime-oriented programs were offered. . . . By 1986, twenty-nine hours of violent programs were being offered" ([Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1988], pp. 45-46).

I believe that the number of violent programs has increased substantially since 1986.

Mr. Wright continued: "Not only is violence increasing on TV, but every form of immorality, vice, and corruption is also being paraded before our family's eyes in ever-increasing amounts. Ask yourself if the same kinds of sexually related scenes and messages of all too many programs of today were found in the programs of twenty years ago. We are being exposed to growing amounts of inappropriate material if we choose to watch TV without being selective" (Families in Danger, p. 46).

In the Church, we often state the couplet, "Be in the world but not of the world." As we observe television shows that make profanity, violence, and infidelity commonplace and even glamorous, we often wish we could lock out the world in some way and isolate our families from it all.

Perhaps the proper response to outrageous behavior is outrage, or, more to the point, the proper response to outrageous television is outrage. I express my own and this church's disappointment, disagreement, and even outrage with television that turns our attention and sometimes our inclinations toward violence, self-serving greed, profanity, disrespect for traditional values, sexual promiscuity, and deviance.

Nephi predicted that in our day Satan would "rage in the hearts of the children of men, and stir them up to anger against that which is good" (2 Nephi 28:20). Satan's evil use of television contributes to the increased wickedness in our society.

Perhaps we should state the couplet previously mentioned as two separate admonitions. First, "Be in the world." Be involved; be informed. Try to be understanding and tolerant and to appreciate diversity. Make meaningful contributions to society through service and involvement. Second, "Be not of the world." Do not follow wrong paths or bend to accommodate or accept what is not right.

We should strive to change the corrupt and immoral tendencies in television and in society by keeping things that offend and debase out of our homes. In spite of all of the wickedness in the world, and in spite of all the opposition to good that we find on every hand, we should not try to take ourselves or our children out of the world. Jesus said, "The kingdom of heaven is like unto leaven," or yeast (Matthew 13:33). We are to lift the world and help all to rise above the wickedness that surrounds us. The Savior prayed to the Father:

"I pray not that thou shouldest take them out of the world, but that thou shouldest keep them from the evil" (John 17:15).

Members of the Church need to influence more than we are influenced. We should work to stem the tide of sin and evil instead of passively being swept along by it. We each need to help solve the problem rather than avoid or ignore it. I like this simple little poem:
 

All the water in the world

No matter how it tried

Could never sink the smallest ship

Unless it got inside.

All the evil of the world

And every kind of sin

Could never damn a human soul

Unless we let it in.
 

We can live in the world, brothers and sisters, without letting the world into us. We have the gospel message that can carry men and women buoyantly through the "mist of darkness" (1 Nephi 8:23) to the source of all light. We can raise children who have been taught to discern and to make personal righteous decisions.

The Lord does not need a society that hides and isolates itself from the world. Rather, he needs stalwart individuals and families who live exemplary lives in the world and demonstrate that joy and fulfillment come not of the world but through the spirit and the doctrine of Jesus Christ.

Now, what can we as individuals and families do to reverse the negative trends of television? Let me review with you some suggestions.

Research data indicates that families that limit television viewing to a maximum of two hours a day of carefully selected programs may see the following significant changes in family relationships:

1. Value setting will be taught and reinforced by the family. Families will learn how to establish values and how to reason together.

2. Relationships between parents and youth will increase in families.

3. Homework will be completed with less pressure of time.

4. Personal conversations will increase substantially.

5. Children's imaginations will come back to life.

6. Each family member will become a discriminating selector and evaluator of programs.

7. Parents can become family leaders again.

8. Good reading habits may be substituted for television viewing.

Brothers and sisters, we can write to local radio and television stations and to cable and national networks to express our concerns. The sponsors and advertisers who pay for programs and advertising that are offensive would most likely appreciate hearing from us also.

In my opinion, we must make our influence felt by joining with other concerned people who oppose television programming that tears down and destroys the values that have made our families and our countries strong. Latter-day Saints are not alone in this concern. Many individuals, churches, and other organizations are raising their voices. Let us join with them, brothers and sisters, to persuade TV script writers, executives, and sponsors to use their talents and resources to help build a better and safer world.

President George Bush, in his inaugural address, called for a kinder face of the nation and a gentler face of the world (see Investor's Daily, 23 Jan. 1989, p. 11). Let it begin by a kinder and gentler television throughout the world.

The prophet Mormon said that each of us is given the Spirit of Christ to know good from evil; everything that invites us to do good is of God. On the other hand, anything that persuades us to do evil is of the devil, for he and those who follow him persuade no one to do good. (See Moroni 7:16-18.) This simple test will guide us in judging television and other media programs.

May the Lord bless us and help us protect ourselves, our families, and the spirit of our homes, and help us improve our world through working for improved television programming.

I leave you my testimony that we have only one sure way to secure our homes and our families, and that is through learning and living the principles of the gospel of Jesus Christ. May the Lord bless you and help you prevent anything of an evil nature from entering your homes, I pray humbly, in the name of Jesus Christ, amen.

 

(Jeremiah 3:1-2.)

 

1 They say, If a man put away his wife, and she go from him, and become another man's, shall he return unto her again? shall not that land be greatly polluted? but thou hast played the harlot with many lovers; yet return again to me, saith the LORD.

 

2 Lift up thine eyes unto the high places, and see where thou hast not been lien with. In the ways hast thou sat for them, as the Arabian in the wilderness; and thou hast polluted the land with thy whoredoms and with thy wickedness.

 

Where is the harshness of God in these verses?  He is kind, gentle and full of love.  Examples like these are found throughout the OT.  Even in all your sins come unto me, come home.

 

Jeremiah loves the Hebrew word turn, return, it is found throughout his writings, shube.

 

Israel has no desire to repent, like a whore who is married.

 

(Jeremiah 3:3-15.)

3 Therefore the showers have been withholden, and there hath been no latter rain; and thou hadst a whore's forehead, thou refusedst to be ashamed.

 

4 Wilt thou not from this time cry unto me, My father, thou art the guide of my youth?

 

5 Will he reserve his anger for ever? will he keep it to the end? Behold, thou hast spoken and done evil things as thou couldest.

 

6 ¶ The LORD said also unto me in the days of Josiah the king, Hast thou seen that which backsliding Israel hath done? she is gone up upon every high mountain and under every green tree, and there hath played the harlot.

 

7 And I said after she had done all these things, Turn thou unto me. But she returned not. And her treacherous sister Judah saw it.

 

8 And I saw, when for all the causes whereby backsliding Israel committed adultery I had put her away, and given her a bill of divorce; yet her treacherous sister Judah feared not, but went and played the harlot also.

 

9 And it came to pass through the lightness of her whoredom, that she defiled the land, and committed adultery with stones and with stocks.

 

10 And yet for all this her treacherous sister Judah hath not turned unto me with her whole heart, but feignedly, saith the LORD.

 

11 And the LORD said unto me, The backsliding Israel hath justified herself more than treacherous Judah.

 

12 ¶ Go and proclaim these words toward the north, and say, Return, thou backsliding Israel, saith the LORD; and I will not cause mine anger to fall upon you: for I am merciful, saith the LORD, and I will not keep anger for ever.

 

13 Only acknowledge thine iniquity, that thou hast transgressed against the LORD thy God, and hast scattered thy ways to the strangers under every green tree, and ye have not obeyed my voice, saith the LORD.

 

14 Turn, O backsliding children, saith the LORD; for I am married unto you: and I will take you one of a city, and two of a family, and I will bring you to Zion:

 

15 And I will give you pastors according to mine heart, which shall feed you with knowledge and understanding.

 

Verse 4 – This is an example of pure, perfect and divine love, but not unconditional love, if you don’t come back I can’t help you.  God cannot override justice.  Judah didn’t learn the lessons of Israel’s scattering.

 

2 symbols – Husband – Wife and Father – Child

 

(Joshua 24:14.)

 

14 ¶ Now therefore fear the LORD, and serve him in sincerity and in truth: and put away the gods which your fathers served on the other side of the flood, and in Egypt; and serve ye the LORD.

 

Fear = Fear, we soften fear today.

 

The story of Achan – he was circumcised, so he made the covenant at Shechem.  He broke that covenant, so he was destroyed and all that he possessed his wife and family, he lost everything because he broke the covenant they had to share in his fate.  Joshua 7.

 

He lost everything, but his family did not in the spirit world, it isn’t a curse for them in the eternities, only for him.

 

 

 We have commandments to love the Lord.  If we reject Him then his love cannot save us.  Look at the great and spacious building, the flood, Israel was destroyed etc.

 

Don’t be troubled by the concept of fearing the Lord, the consequences are painful.  Fear isn’t the same as honor or respect.  If I don’t fear I may not repent.

 

Who determines the consequences of sin, both sides!

 

(2 Nephi 2:7-10.)

 

7 Behold, he offereth himself a sacrifice for sin, to answer the ends of the law, unto all those who have a broken heart and a contrite spirit; and unto none else can the ends of the law be answered.

 

8 Wherefore, how great the importance to make these things known unto the inhabitants of the earth, that they may know that there is no flesh that can dwell in the presence of God, save it be through the merits, and mercy, and grace of the Holy Messiah, who layeth down his life according to the flesh, and taketh it again by the power of the Spirit, that he may bring to pass the resurrection of the dead, being the first that should rise.

 

9 Wherefore, he is the firstfruits unto God, inasmuch as he shall make intercession for all the children of men; and they that believe in him shall be saved.

 

10 And because of the intercession for all, all men come unto God; wherefore, they stand in the presence of him, to be judged of him according to the truth and holiness which is in him. Wherefore, the ends of the law which the Holy One hath given, unto the inflicting of the punishment which is affixed, which punishment that is affixed is in opposition to that of the happiness which is affixed, to answer the ends of the atonement—

 

 

 

 

 

 

Happiness

 

 

                  Mercy                                         Law                               Justice

                  Truth, Grace

                  Atonement

Punishment

 

 

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 19:15-20.)

 

15 Therefore I command you to repent—repent, lest I smite you by the rod of my mouth, and by my wrath, and by my anger, and your sufferings be sore—how sore you know not, how exquisite you know not, yea, how hard to bear you know not.

 

16 For behold, I, God, have suffered these things for all, that they might not suffer if they would repent;

 

17 But if they would not repent they must suffer even as I;

 

18 Which suffering caused myself, even God, the greatest of all, to tremble because of pain, and to bleed at every pore, and to suffer both body and spirit—and would that I might not drink the bitter cup, and shrink—

 

19 Nevertheless, glory be to the Father, and I partook and finished my preparations unto the children of men.

 

20 Wherefore, I command you again to repent, lest I humble you with my almighty power; and that you confess your sins, lest you suffer these punishments of which I have spoken, of which in the smallest, yea, even in the least degree you have tasted at the time I withdrew my Spirit.

 

 

We don’t suffer eternal consequences for our sins, but if we don’t repent we will feel that weight later on in the spirit world, the punishment here is merely postponed if we don’t repent. They lost the fear of punishment.

 

 

The Northern kingdom never had a righteous king, they are more justified then the Southern kingdom, Judah has no excuse for its backsliding.  Judah after watching the destruction of the Northern kingdom doesn’t think it will happen to them.

 

Judah went through many reforms and they never stuck!

 

 Jeremiah 3:12-17 – Jeremiah is looking to the future, he is talking to the 10 tribes, to repent and return home.  Acknowledge your sins and repent I will marry you again, and you will be brought to Zion.  The gathering will be a long drawn out process.  You will have pastors after my own heart, like the 1st Presidency and the Quorum of the 12 today!  Verse 16, the old temple ways won’t be remembered in the future; no ark to worship in the future, the remembering of God is not in outward things but is found in ones heart.

 

Verses 17-18 - He quotes Isaiah 2 – The House of Israel will again be one.  Ephraim will seek out both kingdoms; the North will find the Southern kingdom.  Here we are!  Ephraim (North) is searching for both today.  There is no hope for them in Jeremiah’s time; the hope was in the future, our day.

 

Read the chapter summaries for chapters 4-6.

 

(Jeremiah 4:19.)

 

19 ¶ My bowels, my bowels! I am pained at my very heart; my heart maketh a noise in me; I cannot hold my peace, because thou hast heard, O my soul, the sound of the trumpet, the alarm of war.

 

 

They don’t believe the destruction prophesied will happen, Jeremiah sees it and is pained throughout his body.

 

The Jerusalem of Lehi's time, for example, was seen differently by different eyes. Laman and Lemuel, reluctant to leave, resented their exodus, saying later, "we have suffered in the wilderness, which time. . . we might have been happy" back in the land of Jerusalem (1 Nephi 17:21). Yet not only did the Prophet Lehi see wickedness in the people of Jerusalem but so did Jeremiah. Jeremiah's writings describe the adultery and immorality in the Jerusalem of that time, using imagery about individuals going "by troops in the harlots' houses" (jer. 5:7Jeremiah 5:7-8). Laman and Lemuel looked beyond the mark:

 

And we know that the people who were in the land of Jerusalem were a righteous people; for they kept the statutes and judgments of the Lord, and all his commandments, according to the law of Moses; wherefore, we know that they are a righteous people; and our father hath judged them, and hath led us away because we would hearken unto his words; yea, and our brother is like unto him. And after this manner of language did my brethren murmur and complain against us. (1 Nephi 17:22.)

 

Thus can people come to have errant pride in the status quo; hence the importance of listening to the Lord's prophets without being offended.

 

Despite all their warnings and pleadings the prophets recognize and honor human agency as given by the God they serve. They are well aware of how dangerous the sensual human appetites are, but also are conscious that these celebrated appetites of the "here and now" will not survive after the resurrection, for "the world passeth away, and the lust thereof" (1 John 2:17). The worldly appetites are, in a sense, like secularism's manna, a day-to-day thing, seldom preserved overnight. Instead, prophets urge the long view of the individual's eternal self-interest.

 

(Neal A. Maxwell, Not My Will, But Thine [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1998], 60.)

 

 

The First Siege of Jerusalem (2 Kgs. 23-30-24:16; 2 Chron. 36:1-10)

 

In a little more than twenty years Jerusalem would fall. With Necho's victory over Josiah, Judah again became a tributary, this time to Egypt. Josiah's twenty-three-year-old son, Jehoahaz, was anointed king. Following in the evil footsteps of his great-grandfather, Manasseh, Jehoahaz ruled only three months (609 B.C.) before being removed by Necho and deported to Egypt (2 Kgs. 23:31-33). A puppet ruler named Eliakim, another son of Josiah, was then installed. Necho changed his name to Jehoiakim (609-598 B.C.) and forced him to exact massive tributes from the people of Judah (2 Kgs. 23:33, 35). Jehoiakim also followed in the footsteps of Manasseh, squandering funds and subjecting the people to forced labor (Jer. 22:13-19).

 

Egypt's dominance of Judah ended in 605 B.C., when Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon defeated Necho and his army at Carchemish, thus becoming the master of the Near East. Jehoiakim was now forced to submit to the Babylonian monarch and "became his servant three years: then he turned and rebelled against him" (2 Kgs. 24:1). The rebellion was a fatal error for Jehoiakim and Judah, even though retaliation was not immediate. Nebuchadnezzar had returned home to reorganize his armies after a battle with Egypt in 601 B.C. in which both sides sustained heavy losses. The Babylonian king did not march with his armies until December, 598 B.C., the same month in which Jehoiakim's eleven-year reign, declared "evil in the sight of the Lord" (2 Kgs. 23:37), ended with his death. fn Josiah's reforms had long since collapsed, and idolatrous worship returned along with the deterioration of public morality. Jeremiah, whose ministry overlapped with the reigns of Judah's last five kings, bore testimony of his country's degeneration (see Jer. 5:26-29; Jer. 7:147:1-18; 11:9-14).

 

Jehoiakim's eighteen-year-old son, Jehoiachin, also denounced as an evil ruler, was placed on the throne in 598 B.C. (2 Kgs. 24:9). The first Babylonian siege of Jerusalem occurred three months later, with the city surrendering to Nebuchadnezzar on 16 March 597 B.C. fn At this time, Jehoiachin, his mother, and the entire royal household were taken hostage and transported to Babylon (2 Kgs. 24:12). Along with the royal family, thousands of Judah's leaders, craftsmen, soldiers, and people of influence were carried away (2 Kgs. 24:14-16). This was the beginning of what is called "the Exile," the period in which the Jews were exiled from their homeland to Babylonia. It was the deportation which took Ezekiel, and probably also Daniel, to later begin prophetic ministries among the exiled Jews. The account states that "none remained, save the poorest sort of the people of the land" (2 Kgs. 24:14). We learn later, however, that a few people of status and leadership must have remained, for the weak character of Jehoiachin's successor would be no match for the stronger wills of some of the survivors. Nonetheless, Nebuchadnezzar's actions show that he did not want to leave anyone who might organize or carry out a rebellion.

 

 

(Kent P. Jackson, ed., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 4: 1 Kings to Malachi [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1993], 173.)

 

 

(Jeremiah 5:7-12, 14) – The wickedness of the people of Jerusalem in Lehi’s time

 

7 ¶ How shall I pardon thee for this? thy children have forsaken me, and sworn by them that are no gods: when I had fed them to the full, they then committed adultery, and assembled themselves by troops in the harlots' houses.

 

8 They were as fed horses in the morning: every one neighed after his neighbour's wife.

 

9 Shall I not visit for these things? saith the LORD: and shall not my soul be avenged on such a nation as this?

 

10 ¶ Go ye up upon her walls, and destroy; but make not a full end: take away her battlements; for they are not the LORD's.

 

11 For the house of Israel and the house of Judah have dealt very treacherously against me, saith the LORD.

 

12 They have belied the LORD, and said, It is not he; neither shall evil come upon us; neither shall we see sword nor famine:

 

14 Wherefore thus saith the LORD God of hosts, Because ye speak this word, behold, I will make my words in thy mouth fire, and this people wood, and it shall devour them.

 

 

By denying this you are blowing fire on the wood, Babylon is coming with no mercy.  You are going into slavery, and will worship foreign gods in their land not in the holy land of Israel.

 

It’s no sacrifice to live the gospel, it’s a sacrifice not living it, you withhold blessing from yourselves.

 

We will live in a time of great lust not unlike another when it was said to an evil people, "How shall I pardon thee for this? thy children have forsaken me, and sworn by them that are no gods: when I had fed them to the full, they then committed adultery, and assembled themselves by troops in the harlots' houses. They were as fed horses in the morning: every one neighed after his neighbour's wife." (Jeremiah 5:7-8.)

 

The very crassness of worldly ways, once the hardening has reached a certain point, is such that shame is no longer possible. Such a time had apparently been reached in the days of Jeremiah when, speaking of the evils among the people, he asked, "Were they ashamed when they had committed abomination? nay, they were not at all ashamed, neither could they blush: therefore they shall fall among them that fall: . . . Thus saith the Lord, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. . . ." (Jeremiah 6:15-16.) The phrasing of Jeremiah is significant in our time. He speaks of the people who had lost their capacity to walk in old paths and to blush. Sound familiar? Indeed this description sounds like a people who had not only departed from the ways of the Lord, but who also "loved to have it so."

 

If in these times there seem to be more warnings than in other ages, it is because this is not a time when there can be many words. When someone is about to step into the path of an oncoming truck, the individual giving the warning does not take time to explain the make, model, and color of the truck that is coming or indeed to mention the velocity. He simply shouts! There is often no time to do more regarding some of the trends in our society.

 

This is an age, too, when it may again be necessary for leaders to do what leaders did once before in Book of Mormon times, to bear down in "pure testimony" so people will know clearly what their choices are. In a time around eighty-four years before Christ, there were among the people of the Church "envyings, and strife, and malice, and persecutions, and pride, even to exceed the pride of those who did not belong to the church of God." (Alma 4:9.)

 

The Church did not progress. Indeed the wickedness in some of the members of the Church was "a great stumbling-block to those who did not belong to the church." (Alma 4:10.) In such a setting Alma retained the office of high priest in the Church and gave up "the judgment-seat unto Nephihah." (Alma 4:18.) Alma did this because he saw clearly what was necessary. He freed himself in terms of his time so that he might "preach the word of God unto them, to stir them up in remembrance of their duty, and that he might pull down, by the word of God, all the pride and craftiness and all the contentions which were among his people, seeing no way that he might reclaim them save it were in bearing down in pure testimony against them." (Alma 4:19. Italics added.)

 

That society was sufficiently far gone that it was too late to turn it around by debates in a Parliament and by this or that judicial decision. The people had to be told, and told plainly, of the peril they faced.

 

Of course, this does not mean that warnings cannot be given in love or that the testimonies cannot be born in genuine love and affection. Even the warnings that must be delivered abruptly can be given, indeed should be given, with the truth being spoken, as Paul counseled us, in love. People can often respond at first to our love and to our concern more than to the content of our message. The quality of our lives can make it so much easier for people to believe on our words. When they have heard the gospel from us, they may say as a queenly woman said, "I have had no witness save thy word . . . nevertheless I believe." (Alma 19:9.)

 

Given the kind of high adventure that we know is coming to us such as is contained in the prophecy of Heber C. Kimball, we must be prepared to speak plainly. President Kimball said that prior to the rebuilding of the Church in Missouri, "The Saints will be put to tests that will try the integrity of the best of them. The pressure will become so great that the more righteous among them will cry unto the Lord day and night until deliverance comes." (Deseret News, Church Section, May 23, 1931, p. 3. Italics added.)

 

Difficulties of this degree will be experienced before traumatic deliverance comes. In such circumstances, what we say must be said plainly though lovingly. There is no time for sophistry or games or cleverness. Somehow in such circumstances, the proper balance will be struck by the prophets who will see that the gospel is carried to all nations "for a witness" in which we focus on preaching "Christ and him crucified," so that other less important things do not get in the way of that grand message. At the same time there will apparently be, according to President Brigham Young, a very special effort made. President Young said, "I expect to see the day when the Elders of Israel will protect and sustain civil and religious liberty and every constitutional right bequeathed to us by our fathers, and spread those rights abroad in connection with the Gospel for the salvation of all nations." (Journal of Discourses 11:262-63.) But such an added emphasis would come only by prophetic direction.

 

These prophetic comments were made in an address in the Bowery in Salt Lake City August 12, 1866. President Young had just listened to an address by Elder George A. Smith, who had apparently recapitulated something of the history and suffering of the Church and its people and their coming to the Salt Lake Valley. President Young was able to be forgiving and ecumenical in the face of those memories and observed: "I am thankful that the rehearsal of those occurrences has ceased to irritate me as it did formerly." (JD 11:257.) He had risen above the harsh history that had brought the Saints to that valley and the afflictions that had accompanied their pioneer passage.

 

We should not be dismayed if our words are reacted to as the words of earlier leaders were reacted to in Old Testament times. We read this searing indictment with regard to the insensitivity of earlier inhabitants: "But they mocked the messengers of God, and despised his words, and misused his prophets, . . . till there was no remedy." (2 Chronicles 36:16. Italics added.)

 

But enduring, as already indicated, consists of much more than just coping with the passage of time or putting up with things we cannot change, though these are a part of enduring. We must, for instance, endure in doing good without becoming weary in well-doing—a special challenge in declining times when we may be tempted to think the good done is of no consequence.

 

 

(Neal A. Maxwell, Wherefore, Ye Must Press Forward [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1977], 112.)

 

 

(Jeremiah 6:14-15.)

 

14 They have healed also the hurt of the daughter of my people slightly, saying, Peace, peace; when there is no peace.

 

15 Were they ashamed when they had committed abomination? nay, they were not at all ashamed, neither could they blush: therefore they shall fall among them that fall: at the time that I visit them they shall be cast down, saith the LORD.

 

Like Laman, what’s wrong?  No guilt they lost the light of Christ.  The children will not be raised in a society with agency; they need to be destroyed so the children can have a chance.

 

 

2:1-37 Israel was holiness unto the Lord. . . . What iniquity have your fathers found in me, that they are gone far from me

 

 Israel had been quite well prepared in Joshua's time to enter the Promised Land and become a "kingdom of priests, and an holy nation" as the Lord and Moses had intended (Ex. 19:4-6; Josh. 1). But in the nine hundred years thereafter, their spiritual condition had been up and down many times. During Hezekiah's reign and Isaiah's ministry, northern Israel was conquered and exiled; Judah, however, hearkened to the king and the prophet and was saved by the Lord from Assyria's siege (2 Kgs. 17-20).

 

The "fathers" mentioned in this prophecy may have been those of the long, idolatrous reign of Hezekiah's son Manasseh and grandson Amon (ca. 697-640 B.C.; 2 Kgs. 21; cf. Jer. 15:4). Many of the evils Jeremiah condemned and fought against throughout his mission were the religious and social sins made common in that fifty-seven year period. The reforms of King Josiah no doubt had some good effects; but just as good character grows like a tree and evil multiplies like weeds, so did Judah slip back into evil ways after Josiah's death.

 

In his opening charge, the prophet Jeremiah reprimanded Judah for forgetting past blessings and for failing to turn to the Lord for future blessings needed. Negligent priests and false prophets were partly to blame, but so were the people.

 

Jeremiah ridiculed idolatry and chided Judah for having "changed their gods." In this matter they had been more fickle than the idol-worshipping people who clung to their "gods." His metaphor equated the true God and his blessings to a spring of living waters and idolatry to a cistern (a container for water storage)—indeed, a broken cistern. A spring ("fountain") produces water, but a cistern can only give out what has been put in, and a broken cistern would lose even that (Jer. 2:11-13).

 

He ridiculed Judah's turning to decadent Egypt or to Assyria for help. Had the Israelites forgotten the Lord's defense of them during all the centuries past? Had they forgotten his planting them in the Promised Land, expecting them to bear fruit? Could they ever wash sin away with harsh cleansers, turn from idolatry and from indulging their sensual urges, cease from enjoying carnal things? Evidently not, for they showed love of strangers' ways and said "after them will I go" (Jer. 2:14-25).

 

He ridiculed the Israelites' considering wood or stone as fathers or creators and challenged the people to turn to those wooden or stone "gods" for help. He pleaded with them to repent, turn to the Lord, and not contend with Him. Yet, though they suffered, they would not return.

 

With a metaphor likening idolatry to adultery, Jeremiah ended this discourse by calling attention to Israel's perfidy as the Lord's bride. He showed evidence of their infidelity and their denial of guilt. Their hope of aid from Egypt or Assyria against Babylon was fruitless; they would go out of their lands as exiles, with their hands bound over their heads (Jer. 2:31-37).

 

3:1-11 thou hast played the harlot with many lovers; yet return again to me, saith the Lord

 

Although a husband seldom returns to a divorced wife, yet if Judah repented and called upon God, He would take her back. The Lord would not retain his anger forever, even though she had "spoken and done evil things" (Jer. 3:1-5). In a sense, northern Israel was less blameworthy than "her treacherous sister Judah," for Judah had the example of Israel's apostasy and exile as a warning. Even in King Josiah's reforms, Judah had not turned to the Lord sincerely but only superficially.

 

3:12-25 Go and proclaim these words toward the north, and say, Return, thou backsliding Israel, saith the Lord; . . . and I will take you one of a city, and two of a family, and I will bring you to Zion

 

The Lord turned the prophet's attention from his failing nation to the future Israel, proclaiming in the direction of northern Israel's exile an invitation to return through repentance. Although but "one of a city, and two of a family" responded, "Zion" would commence to be built (Jer. 3:12-14). Family can mean the extended family, or clan, and thus be a very large unit; it is often used in that way (e.g., Jer. 1:15; 8:3; 25:9).

 

In the future Zion, the Lord's shepherds ("pastors") will do what Israel's leaders anciently should have done, but the ark of the covenant and worship procedures associated with it will not be revived. All nations will be gathered unto the Lord, and thus the mission of Abraham will be fulfilled. Judah and the ten tribes of Israel will again be united, and all will worship the Father forever. In anticipation and yearning for that day, Jeremiah again lamented the apostasy ("as a wife treacherously departeth from her husband"), heard her voice of weeping, and declared that salvation is only through the Lord. He even spoke for Israel a confession of error, disobedience, and shame (Jer. 3:20-25).

 

4:1-18 If thou wilt return, O Israel, saith the Lord, return unto me

 

The prophet's appeal for repentance and renewal of covenants continued. People must recultivate their minds and cease sowing "among thorns"; using another metaphor, Jeremiah urged them to circumcise their hearts, symbolizing a cleansing and recommitment. The alternative was to assemble defenses, for the destroyer was on his way and defenders would faint before him. Under that option the prophet spoke with irony about the Lord's promises of peace to earlier Israel, for surely the invader would be like a dry wind from the east, which destroys. Once again the prophet pleaded for repentance from the ways and doings that had procured such destruction for them.

 

4:19-31 I am pained at my very heart; . . . Destruction upon destruction is cried; . . . I beheld the earth, and, lo, it was without form, and void; and the heavens, and they had no light

 

Jeremiah saw the decline and fall of Judah as a vision of the end of the world, a return to chaos as it was before the earth was organized (Jer. 4:23a-b). But the Lord assured him this would not yet be "a full end." In the closing verses, the prophet related his vision of ultimate destruction to the immediate ills and their results. The people of Jerusalem would be fleeing before the Babylonian invader and crying out in agony like a woman in travail, because of violence and bloodshed; but death, not life, would come of it.

 

5:1-31 Run ye to and fro through the streets of Jerusalem, and see now, and know, . . . if there be any that executeth judgment, that seeketh the truth; and I will pardon it

 

The Lord's challenge to Jeremiah to find a righteous person in Jerusalem resembles the impossibility faced by Abraham over Sodom thirteen centuries before, when he hoped to save Lot's family, pleading with the Lord to save that city if even ten righteous people could be found in it (Jer. 5:1a). The Lord, in mercy, did save Lot and some of his family; and in Jerusalem of the time of Jeremiah and Lehi, He guided a few righteous souls to safety, but because too few could be found to preserve the city, Jerusalem would be destroyed (Jer. 5:1, Jer. 5:77, 10-11, 19-21, 25-27; cf. 1 Ne. 1:4-7, 18-20). In Jerusalem of Jeremiah's day, negligent judges ignored injustices, false prophets mollified the people, and priests took authority by their own hand—and the people liked it so.

 

6:1-30 this is the city to be visited; she is wholly oppression in the midst of her. As a fountain casteth out her waters, so she casteth out her wickedness: violence and spoil is heard in her

 

The theme of chapter 6, stated in verses 6 and 7, introduces a multifaceted condemnation of Jerusalem and Judah. First, the people of Benjamin were addressed; they lived in the suburbs of Jerusalem and in areas toward the northwest, west, and southwest.

 

In the face of the great destroyer coming from the north, Jerusalem would be as "a comely and delicate woman." A brief symbolic dialogue characterized the invasion, and decrees were issued against Jerusalem because of her evils. The thoroughness of the gleaning was depicted. Those most blameworthy in causing, or in failing to halt, the decay were again identified as the false prophets and priests who reassured the people of "peace, peace; when there [was] no peace." And these were "not at all ashamed" (Jer. 6:1-15).

 

The people were also blamed for refusing to stand in the old ways and to seek good ways; they rejected the watchmen who did arise to warn them. So unto all was the punishment of Jerusalem. Offerings would not stop it, and escape from the great invading nation coming out of the north country would be impossible.

 

Finally, the Lord urged His errant people to lament, for though the prophet had been set as a tower to warn and a fortress to defend them, the fire of the smelter of His chastisement had not purified them; they were as rejected silver, and so the Lord must reject them.

 

 

(Ellis T. Rasmussen, A Latter-day Saint Commentary on the Old Testament [Salt Lake City: Deseret, 1993], 542.)

 

 

 

 

 

Jeremiah 7-12, 26

The Temple Sermon

September 28, 2006

 

 

 

Jeremiah 7 and 26 seem to be the same sermon given at the temple gate by Jeremiah.  Chapter 26 is one of the biographical chapters about Jeremiah’s life written by his scribe Baruch.

 

7:1-16 Thus saith the Lord . . . Amend your ways and your doings, and I will cause you to dwell in this place

 

The variety of appeals and declamations following one upon another in Jeremiah's book make it evident that it is a collection of his speeches from time to time and place to place during the years of his ministry. There was no one time and place when he could once and for all present the charges against his decadent people, call them to repentance, and proffer them God's merciful desires to take them back. He had to warn them of the terrible alternatives, and he tried again and again.

 

This time, the prophet was asked to "stand in the gate of the Lord's house" and proclaim his message to temple worshippers to amend their ways and doings and become just. They could not assume that by going to the temple and making perfunctory sacrifices in it, they could be excused from repenting. They must learn to do good and cease to do evil. They must not make the temple "a den of robbers" and hope to hide in it, thinking it would not be destroyed. They should remember that the tabernacle at Shiloh had not saved Israel from the Philistines but was destroyed for Israel's wickedness. If the people would not change, Judah would be cast out, just as Ephraim (northern Israel) had been cast out (Jer. 7:1-15, 12a).

 

7:17-28 Seest thou not what they do in the cities of Judah and in the streets of Jerusalem?

 

The Lord called the prophet's attention to the people's worship of the "queen of heaven" and to their continuing failure to perform the proper sacrificial ordinances. Hence they must feel the outpouring of His anger.

 

7:29-34 O Jerusalem . . . take up a lamentation . . . for the children of Judah have done evil in my sight

 

Jeremiah urgently appealed for repentance from Judah's gross apostasy and idolatry in offering their sons and daughters in human sacrifice at Tophet, in the valley of Hinnom southeast of Jerusalem. The Lord had never required human sacrifice. For this evil Judah would be destroyed as if by predators. If the Lord withdrew from them, all joy and mirth would cease and the land would be desolate.

 

 

(Ellis T. Rasmussen, A Latter-day Saint Commentary on the Old Testament [Salt Lake City: Deseret, 1993], 547.)

 

 

26:1-24 In the beginning of the reign of Jehoiakim . . . came this word from the Lord, saying . . . Stand in the court of the Lord's house, and speak unto all the cities of Judah, which come to worship in the Lord's house, all the words that I command thee

 

The first of twenty historical chapters that relate many of the prophet's experiences and the persecution he suffered as he continued his mission, chapter 26 dates to five years before the previous chapter, being "in the beginning of the reign of Jehoiakim," or 609 B.C. Jeremiah delivered this message from the Lord on the temple grounds, so that the worshippers might repent and be saved. If they would not do so, they might know that they would be overcome and the temple itself destroyed, as was the tabernacle at Shiloh in Eli's time (Jer. 26:6a; BD, "Shiloh"). Again false "priests and the prophets" led the people in objecting to the true prophet, and they actually sought his life; the "princes" of Judah listened as Jeremiah stated his message and made his appeal. With astounding insight, they defended him (Jer. 26:10-19a).

 

The king had put one prophet to death for such prophesying (see Jer. 26:20a, on the similar danger to Lehi, another prophet of this same time); however, Ahikam, son of Shaphan the scribe of the days of good King Josiah, successfully defended and saved Jeremiah (Jer. 26:20-23a, 24a).

 

 

(Ellis T. Rasmussen, A Latter-day Saint Commentary on the Old Testament [Salt Lake City: Deseret, 1993], 560.)

 

 

(Jeremiah 26:1.)

 

1 In the beginning of the reign of Jehoiakim the son of Josiah king of Judah came this word from the LORD, saying,

 

 

Josiah was killed in 609 BC in a battle with Egypt, his son a vassal king of Egypt was put on the throne, Jehoiakim, who reversed the reforms of his father and went back to worshipping other gods.  Jehovah commanded Jeremiah to give this sermon, diminish not a word.

 

(Jeremiah 26:2.)

 

2 Thus saith the LORD; Stand in the court of the LORD's house, and speak unto all the cities of Judah, which come to worship in the LORD's house, all the words that I command thee to speak unto them; diminish not a word:

 

Host = Heavenly army, turn from your wicked ways and you can stay in this place.  There were other prophets in the king’s court who worshipped other gods and idols; they held sway in the court.  The Lord calls them liars; trust in Me and this building will stand.  They go back to what they were before Josiah.

 

The events at Shiloh were brought up, the Philistines destroyed the tabernacle because of Israel’s wickedness, and it can happen again (and will happen) at Solomon’s temple.

 

(Jeremiah 7:1-20.) – Jeremiah’s Temple Sermon given to him by the Lord.

 

1 The word that came to Jeremiah from the LORD, saying,

 

2 Stand in the gate of the LORD's house, and proclaim there this word, and say, Hear the word of the LORD, all ye of Judah, that enter in at these gates to worship the LORD.

 

3 Thus saith the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel, Amend your ways and your doings, and I will cause you to dwell in this place.

 

4 Trust ye not in lying words, saying, The temple of the LORD, The temple of the LORD, The temple of the LORD, are these.

 

5 For if ye throughly amend your ways and your doings; if ye throughly execute judgment between a man and his neighbour;

 

6 If ye oppress not the stranger, the fatherless, and the widow, and shed not innocent blood in this place, neither walk after other gods to your hurt:

 

7 Then will I cause you to dwell in this place, in the land that I gave to your fathers, for ever and ever.

 

8 ¶ Behold, ye trust in lying words, that cannot profit.

 

9 Will ye steal, murder, and commit adultery, and swear falsely, and burn incense unto Baal, and walk after other gods whom ye know not;

 

10 And come and stand before me in this house, which is called by my name, and say, We are delivered to do all these abominations?

 

11 Is this house, which is called by my name, become a den of robbers in your eyes? Behold, even I have seen it, saith the LORD.

 

12 But go ye now unto my place which was in Shiloh, where I set my name at the first, and see what I did to it for the wickedness of my people Israel.

 

13 And now, because ye have done all these works, saith the LORD, and I spake unto you, rising up early and speaking, but ye heard not; and I called you, but ye answered not;

 

14 Therefore will I do unto this house, which is called by my name, wherein ye trust, and unto the place which I gave to you and to your fathers, as I have done to Shiloh.

 

15 And I will cast you out of my sight, as I have cast out all your brethren, even the whole seed of Ephraim.

 

16 Therefore pray not thou for this people, neither lift up cry nor prayer for them, neither make intercession to me: for I will not hear thee.

 

17 ¶ Seest thou not what they do in the cities of Judah and in the streets of Jerusalem?

 

18 The children gather wood, and the fathers kindle the fire, and the women knead their dough, to make cakes to the queen of heaven, and to pour out drink offerings unto other gods, that they may provoke me to anger.

 

19 Do they provoke me to anger? saith the LORD: do they not provoke themselves to the confusion of their own faces?

 

20 Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, mine anger and my fury shall be poured out upon this place, upon man, and upon beast, and upon the trees of the field, and upon the fruit of the ground; and it shall burn, and shall not be quenched.

 

 

 

BIBLE DICTIONARY
Shiloh1

A sacred city of Palestine, 9 1/4 miles north from Bethel and 11 1/2 miles south from Shechem, in the tribe of Ephraim (Josh. 18: 1; Judg. 18: 31). The tabernacle was here during the greater part of the period of the Judges, and the place continued to be the religious center of the nation (1 Sam. 1: 3) until after the loss of the Ark in the disastrous battle of Ebenezer. See also Josh. 22: 9, 12; Judg. 21: 12-23; 1 Sam. 1: 24; 1 Sam. 3: 21; 1 Sam. 4: 3-4; 1 Sam. 14: 3; Ps. 78: 60; 1 Kgs. 2: 27; 1 Kgs. 14: 2, 4; Jer. 7: 12-14; Jer. 26: 6; Jer. 41: 5.

 

Bruce described a retaining wall that was the same dimensions of Moses tabernacle; they made it a more permanent structure.  1 Samuel 4-6, at the gate of the tabernacle Eli’s sons practiced the rites of Baal and Ashtoreth, Eli was warned to stop his sons, he did not and the sons were destroyed, the priesthood was taken away from that family.

 

 

Now, speaking of tools, God did not hesitate to use simple tools wherever he had to. We are the tools of God and God has had to use men wherever he found them and as he found them. But the question comes to one's mind Why didn't God, for instance, speak to Eli, for Eli was at that time the prophet and high priest in ancient Israel? But Eli could not or would not do as he was told. He had two sons, Hophni and Phinehas. They were heirs to the priesthood, but they were profligate and wicked, and Eli could not or did not control them.

 

Thus, the Lord had to choose someone else. He chose a small lad, and as God called, "Samuel," Samuel answered: "Speak, for thy servant heareth." (1 Sam. 3:10.) And soon, all Israel from Dan to Beersheba, knew that Samuel was a prophet of God.

 

 

(Elder Theodore M. Burton, Conference Report, April 1961, Afternoon Meeting 127.)

 

 

Moses was given the covenant for Israel around 1250 BC on Mt. Sinai.  Several reforms were attempted by many kings and prophets without lasting success.

 

Exodus 20-23 gives details from Moses of the covenant process.  A prophet never talked about the details of the law that was the priest’s job.  Jeremiah goes back to the covenant several times.

 

Exodus 20 – Giving of the Law, the Ten Commandments

Exodus 21 – Case studies, examples, how to act appropriately

Exodus 22 – Details of keeping the law

Exodus 23 – Integrity, Godly conduct, particulars from God verse 20.  The feasts, times of rest

                    What happens if the covenant is broken and if it is kept and obeyed?  Interesting

 

Prophet – Preach, declare and announce the truth (Hear), a Prophet is to get your attention.

 

Priest – Teach, the details of the Law of Moses (Learn)

 

In Matthew 11:1 - the Lord does both roles.

 

A missionary declares the truth at the door to get your attention, he teaches inside the home, a big difference.

 

(Alma 1:26.)

 

26 And when the priests left their labor to impart the word of God unto the people, the people also left their labors to hear the word of God. And when the priest had imparted unto them the word of God they all returned again diligently unto their labors; and the priest, not esteeming himself above his hearers, for the preacher was no better than the hearer, neither was the teacher any better than the learner; and thus they were all equal, and they did all labor, every man according to his strength.

 

 

The covenant teaches our relationship with God, our relationship with family and neighbors, and our relationship with our enemies.  Israel agreed to keep this covenant many times.

 

 The Lord is supposed to be everything to them.

 

Jeremiah 7:3 – Do your part (amend your ways) and I am bound to bless you (as you keep the terms of the covenant), D&C 82:10.  Israel is supposed to be a Zion community.

 

Jeremiah 7:6-8 – Other gods, a modern example would be the worlds view on finance, family relations, getting ahead in the world, etc. . . .  Lying words that cannot profit

 

College students using credit cards to pay for their education, Bruce told the story of a young man who had big debts and had to postpone his mission until the debts were paid.  The ways of the world

 

 

Jeremiah 7:9-12 – I pacified Jehovah then I can do these other things.  They thought they could get away with it.  He won’t destroy the temple, how could he?  You break all of the covenants then come back here and offer your offerings! 

 

You don’t think the Lord would allow the temple to be destroyed, look at Shiloh; He didn’t stop that because of the wickedness of the people.

 

Jeremiah 7:13 – Rise up early = He has had prophets warning the people for centuries!  Don’t fall into Canaanite ways, they didn’t listen as a whole, although many individuals were obedient.

 

Listen to Conference about our modern cultural norms that are against the gospel, debt, mothers working outside the home.  Things that inhibit us living the gospel fully, the cultures are against the gospel.  When were we taught about debt, mothers working etc?

 

Their calling and destruction were made sure.

 

Jeremiah 7:15 – The Northern kingdom has been scattered, and you are next.

 

Jeremiah 7:16-20 – Jehovah is speaking to Jeremiah alone.  Don’t pray for this people, I won’t hear your prayer for them.  It seems harsh until you think how long the Lord has tried to get their attention.  How long are you going to pay your kids debts?  What lesson do they learn if you keep bailing them out?  Amos and Hosea told the Northern kingdom the same thing.

 

The whole family is involved in their wickedness.  It’s like going to sacrament meeting on Sunday and do as I wish during the week.  Look how they are on the Sabbath then watch their behavior in their homes and in the streets, who does the family really worship?  The full heart is not toward Jehovah, their minds and hearts are serving something else.

 

The Queen of Heaven = Ashtoreth.  They made cakes to her. See footnote in the scripture

 

(Jeremiah 7:21-34.)

 

21 ¶ Thus saith the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel; Put your burnt offerings unto your sacrifices, and eat flesh.

 

22 For I spake not unto your fathers, nor commanded them in the day that I brought them out of the land of Egypt, concerning burnt offerings or sacrifices:

 

23 But this thing commanded I them, saying, Obey my voice, and I will be your God, and ye shall be my people: and walk ye in all the ways that I have commanded you, that it may be well unto you.

 

24 But they hearkened not, nor inclined their ear, but walked in the counsels and in the imagination of their evil heart, and went backward, and not forward.

 

25 Since the day that your fathers came forth out of the land of Egypt unto this day I have even sent unto you all my servants the prophets, daily rising up early and sending them:

 

26 Yet they hearkened not unto me, nor inclined their ear, but hardened their neck: they did worse than their fathers.

 

27 Therefore thou shalt speak all these words unto them; but they will not hearken to thee: thou shalt also call unto them; but they will not answer thee.

 

28 But thou shalt say unto them, This is a nation that obeyeth not the voice of the LORD their God, nor receiveth correction: truth is perished, and is cut off from their mouth.

 

29 ¶ Cut off thine hair, O Jerusalem, and cast it away, and take up a lamentation on high places; for the LORD hath rejected and forsaken the generation of his wrath.

 

30 For the children of Judah have done evil in my sight, saith the LORD: they have set their abominations in the house which is called by my name, to pollute it.

 

31 And they have built the high places of Tophet, which is in the valley of the son of Hinnom, to burn their sons and their daughters in the fire; which I commanded them not, neither came it into my heart.

 

32 ¶ Therefore, behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that it shall no more be called Tophet, nor the valley of the son of Hinnom, but the valley of slaughter: for they shall bury in Tophet, till there be no place.

 

33 And the carcases of this people shall be meat for the fowls of the heaven, and for the beasts of the earth; and none shall fray them away.

 

34 Then will I cause to cease from the cities of Judah, and from the streets of Jerusalem, the voice of mirth, and the voice of gladness, the voice of the bridegroom, and the voice of the bride: for the land shall be desolate.

 

Jeremiah 7:23-24 – A beautiful way to describe disobedience, walking backward and not forward.  Incline your ear = Incline your obedience, verse 26

 

Worship = to prostrate yourself onto the ground with your neck bent downward.  To be meek means to submit to a higher authority, verse 26

 

Jehovah in Exodus 20-23 He never describes burnt offerings, today we are told to be obedient, the purpose of the sacrament.

 

Prophets announce to Israel destruction because you are disobedient, look at Samuel the Lamanite, Judges 2.

 

 Jeremiah 7:29-34 – You aren’t my people so cut off your hair, cut off the vow you made to me.  If you obey my voice you would be my people, but you choose not to do that, so get out of here.  Your partying will soon end.  All of this could have been avoided.

 

How did the crowd take this sermon?

 

Jeremiah 26

 

(Jeremiah 26:2-19.)

 

2 Thus saith the LORD; Stand in the court of the LORD's house, and speak unto all the cities of Judah, which come to worship in the LORD's house, all the words that I command thee to speak unto them; diminish not a word:

 

3 If so be they will hearken, and turn every man from his evil way, that I may repent me of the evil, which I purpose to do unto them because of the evil of their doings.

 

4 And thou shalt say unto them, Thus saith the LORD; If ye will not hearken to me, to walk in my law, which I have set before you,

 

5 To hearken to the words of my servants the prophets, whom I sent unto you, both rising up early, and sending them, but ye have not hearkened;

 

6 Then will I make this house like Shiloh, and will make this city a curse to all the nations of the earth.

 

7 So the priests and the prophets and all the people heard Jeremiah speaking these words in the house of the LORD.

 

8 ¶ Now it came to pass, when Jeremiah had made an end of speaking all that the LORD had commanded him to speak unto all the people, that the priests and the prophets and all the people took him, saying, Thou shalt surely die.

 

9 Why hast thou prophesied in the name of the LORD, saying, This house shall be like Shiloh, and this city shall be desolate without an inhabitant? And all the people were gathered against Jeremiah in the house of the LORD.

 

10 ¶ When the princes of Judah heard these things, then they came up from the king's house unto the house of the LORD, and sat down in the entry of the new gate of the LORD's house.

 

11 Then spake the priests and the prophets unto the princes and to all the people, saying, This man is worthy to die; for he hath prophesied against this city, as ye have heard with your ears.

 

12 ¶ Then spake Jeremiah unto all the princes and to all the people, saying, The LORD sent me to prophesy against this house and against this city all the words that ye have heard.

 

13 Therefore now amend your ways and your doings, and obey the voice of the LORD your God; and the LORD will repent him of the evil that he hath pronounced against you.

 

14 As for me, behold, I am in your hand: do with me as seemeth good and meet unto you.

 

15 But know ye for certain, that if ye put me to death, ye shall surely bring innocent blood upon yourselves, and upon this city, and upon the inhabitants thereof: for of a truth the LORD hath sent me unto you to speak all these words in your ears.

 

16 ¶ Then said the princes and all the people unto the priests and to the prophets; This man is not worthy to die: for he hath spoken to us in the name of the LORD our God.

 

17 Then rose up certain of the elders of the land, and spake to all the assembly of the people, saying,

 

18 Micah the Morasthite prophesied in the days of Hezekiah king of Judah, and spake to all the people of Judah, saying, Thus saith the LORD of hosts; Zion shall be plowed like a field, and Jerusalem shall become heaps, and the mountain of the house as the high places of a forest.

 

19 Did Hezekiah king of Judah and all Judah put him at all to death? did he not fear the LORD, and besought the LORD, and the LORD repented him of the evil which he had pronounced against them? Thus might we procure great evil against our souls.

 

Remember these verses are just the highlights of the sermon, Jeremiah 7 and 26 are the same sermon recorded twice.

 

The people, priests and princes didn’t like what they heard.  They wanted to kill Jeremiah, but they would shed innocent blood, which they needed to be reminded of.  The prophet Micah said the same thing 100 years earlier, so you have two testimonies and two witnesses against the people.  They still had a portion of the light of Christ in them because they knew the truth of the words spoken against them.  Jeremiah was bold in his testimony, he wasn’t going to hide, the preaching must continue, he needed to get the attention of the people so they can have the opportunity to repent.

 

 

The Temple Sermon (Jer. 7) – David Rolph Seely

 

The description of the Temple Sermon in the biographical chapter 26 is so close to the account of the actual sermon in chapter 7 that it is almost certain that the event described is the same. The date is 609 B.C., the first year of King Jehoiakim. The circumstance is similar to Jesus' cleansing of the temple (Matt. 21:12-13; Mark 11:15-18; Luke 19:45-48), and in fact, Christ even quoted Jeremiah's charge of a "den of robbers" (Jer. 7:11; Matt. 21:13; Mark 11:17; Luke 19:46). Jeremiah faced a hard-hearted and self-righteous people who did not wish to hear his message of repentance. This people had developed a self-righteous assurance that the Lord would protect and preserve them. It was based on the existence of the temple—the house of the Lord—combined with the recent reforms of Josiah, which succeeded in reforming the external practices of religion to the Mosaic prescriptions. The people were certain that these would preserve them.

 

Jeremiah responded to the first of these false notions with the warning, "Trust ye not in the lying words, saying, The temple of the Lord, The temple of the Lord, The temple of the Lord" (Jer. 7:4). To the second false notion, perhaps revealing that he considered the net result of Josiah's reforms to be superficial at best, Jeremiah cited compliance with the moral injunctions of the Mosaic covenant as the only safety, not an outward adherence to the laws of sacrifice alone: "If ye throughly amend your ways and your doings; if ye throughly execute judgment between a man and his neighbour; If ye oppress not the stranger, the fatherless, and the widow, and shed not innocent blood in this place, neither walk after other gods to your hurt: then will I cause you to dwell in this place, in the land that I gave to your fathers, for ever and ever" (Jer. 7:5-7).

 

This language was certainly familiar to those at the temple that day, because this same injunction to the people to care for the defenseless among them — widows, orphans, and foreigners — is found in Exodus 22:21-22, where it is followed by the stern warning: "If thou afflict them in any wise, and they cry at all unto me, I will surely hear their cry; and my wrath shall wax hot, and I will kill you with the sword; and your wives shall be widows, and your children fatherless" (vv. 23-24).

 

Jeremiah's message reminds us of the message of the Savior in his ministry and the self-righteous hypocrisy of the outwardly religious, which should serve as a solemn reminder to all of the covenant children who are favored in having the temple in their midst. We are reminded of such statements as "Woe unto you . . . hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith" (Matt. 23:23) and of the comparison to "whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness" (Matt. 23:27). The Savior outlined the criterion for final judgment: "For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in: Naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited me: I was in prison, and ye came unto me" (Matt. 25:35-36).

 

In addition, Jeremiah cited the sins of the people as stealing, murder, adultery, false swearing, burning incense unto Baal, and walking after other gods — six of the Ten Commandments (Ex. 20:3-17). A similar list is found in the lawsuit in Hosea 4:2. Indeed, the temple had "become a den of robbers" (Jer. 7:11).

 

As an object lesson, Jeremiah reminded them of what happened to the house of the Lord at Shiloh (1 Sam. 1:7). If Jeremiah was indeed a descendant of Eli, custodian of the tabernacle at Shiloh (1 Sam. 1:9), this story would have been a vivid recollection in Jeremiah's family. The Lord asked Judah, "But go ye now unto my place which was in Shiloh, where I set my name at the first, and see what I did to it for the wickedness of my people Israel" (Jer. 7:12). In contrast to the well-documented capture of the ark of the covenant when unrighteous Israel was delivered into the hand of the Philistines in 1 Samuel 4 through 7, an account of the destruction of Shiloh where the ark had been kept is only preserved here (see also Ps. 78:60).

 

The Lord in his wrath ordered Jeremiah not even to attempt to intercede for such a people as they had become (Jer. 7:16; see also 14:11-12). Apparently idolatry was still rampant in the land, and while the children collected the wood, the fathers made the fire and the mothers baked the cakes to the queen of heaven (Jer. 7:18). fn The Lord, probably as hyperbole, stated that he had never ordered sacrifice in the first place but rather would have obedience. Such a sentiment, also found in Amos (5:21-25), Hosea (6:6), Isaiah (1:10-17), and Micah (6:1-8), is probably meant not as a polemic against all sacrifice but rather as a way of emphasizing the importance of obedience to the moral injunctions as opposed to only the strict adherence to ritual. fn The importance of obedience over sacrifice was dramatically taught by Samuel to Saul in the incident of Agag the Amalekite in 1 Samuel 15.

 

Throughout Israel's history the Lord reminded them of their commitment to obedience, "but they hearkened not, nor inclined their ear, but walked in the counsels and in the imagination of their evil heart [see D&C 1:16], and went backward, and not forward" (Jer. 7:24). He constantly sent his prophets, "yet they hearkened not unto me, nor inclined their ear, but hardened their neck: they did worse than their fathers" (Jer. 7:26), a phenomenon that Jeremiah would personally witness and experience throughout his life. The result would be as prophesied by the Lord to Moses, "My wrath shall wax hot, and I will kill you with the sword; and your wives shall be widows, and your children fatherless" (Ex. 22:24) — slaughter, destruction, and exile — "then will I cause to cease from the cities of Judah, and from the streets of Jerusalem, the voice of mirth, and the voice of gladness, the voice of the bridegroom, and the voice of the bride: for the land shall be desolate" (Jer. 7:34).

 

In chapter 26 we learn that after this sermon the people, in conjunction with the priests and prophets, took Jeremiah before the rulers of Judah, saying, "Thou shalt surely die" (Jer. 26:8-10). They charged him before the rulers as prophesying against the holy city. Jeremiah's defense was simple: "The Lord sent me to prophesy against this house and against this city all the words that ye have heard. Therefore now amend your ways and your doings, and obey the voice of the Lord your God, and repent, and the Lord will turn away the evil that he hath pronounced against you" (JST Jer. 26:12-13). In the ensuing debate "certain of the elders" argued that Jeremiah should be spared, citing the example of Micah, who also had prophesied against the city and had been spared by King Hezekiah. It was probably only the intervention of Ahikam, the son of Shaphan, fn a high court official, that saved Jeremiah's life. The danger of being killed for delivering such a message was real, as evidenced by a note at the end of chapter 26 about an otherwise unknown prophet Urijah of Kirjath-jearim, who, like Jeremiah, prophesied against Jerusalem during the reign of King Jehoiakim. The king sought to put him to death, but he fled to Egypt. The relentless king then had him hunted down, extradited, convicted, and finally killed (Jer. 26:20-23).

 

 

(Kent P. Jackson, ed., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 4: 1 Kings to Malachi [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1993], 220.)

 

(1 Nephi 7:13-14.)

 

13 And if it so be that we are faithful to him, we shall obtain the land of promise; and ye shall know at some future period that the word of the Lord shall be fulfilled concerning the destruction of Jerusalem; for all things which the Lord hath spoken concerning the destruction of Jerusalem must be fulfilled.

 

14 For behold, the Spirit of the Lord ceaseth soon to strive with them; for behold, they have rejected the prophets, and Jeremiah have they cast into prison. And they have sought to take away the life of my father, insomuch that they have driven him out of the land.

 

 

Nephi knew the people of Jerusalem well.

 

Jeremiah 26:20-21 – Uriah an unknown prophet was killed saying the same things as Micah and Jeremiah.  Jehoiakim sent servants to Egypt to bring Uriah back to kill him.

 

 

Remember the Hebrew word for repent is TURN.  The Lord will TURN from the evil He will do to this people if they TURN back to worship and obey HIM.

 

Lord of Hosts = Do you want me to be your war God; OK I will war against you!

 

 

Jeremiah 8 is a chapter of great lamentation, there is no hope for this people, and they are lost.

 

(Jeremiah 8:1-21.)

 

1 At that time, saith the LORD, they shall bring out the bones of the kings of Judah, and the bones of his princes, and the bones of the priests, and the bones of the prophets, and the bones of the inhabitants of Jerusalem, out of their graves:

 

2 And they shall spread them before the sun, and the moon, and all the host of heaven, whom they have loved, and whom they have served, and after whom they have walked, and whom they have sought, and whom they have worshipped: they shall not be gathered, nor be buried; they shall be for dung upon the face of the earth.

 

3 And death shall be chosen rather than life by all the residue of them that remain of this evil family, which remain in all the places whither I have driven them, saith the LORD of hosts.

 

4 ¶ Moreover thou shalt say unto them, Thus saith the LORD; Shall they fall, and not arise? shall he turn away, and not return?

 

5 Why then is this people of Jerusalem slidden back by a perpetual backsliding? they hold fast deceit, they refuse to return.

 

6 I hearkened and heard, but they spake not aright: no man repented him of his wickedness, saying, What have I done? every one turned to his course, as the horse rusheth into the battle.

 

7 Yea, the stork in the heaven knoweth her appointed times; and the turtle and the crane and the swallow observe the time of their coming; but my people know not the judgment of the LORD.

 

8 How do ye say, We are wise, and the law of the LORD is with us? Lo, certainly in vain made he it; the pen of the scribes is in vain.

 

9 The wise men are ashamed, they are dismayed and taken: lo, they have rejected the word of the LORD; and what wisdom is in them?

 

10 Therefore will I give their wives unto others, and their fields to them that shall inherit them: for every one from the least even unto the greatest is given to covetousness, from the prophet even unto the priest every one dealeth falsely.

 

11 For they have healed the hurt of the daughter of my people slightly, saying, Peace, peace; when there is no peace.

 

12 Were they ashamed when they had committed abomination? nay, they were not at all ashamed, neither could they blush: therefore shall they fall among them that fall: in the time of their visitation they shall be cast down, saith the LORD.

 

13 ¶ I will surely consume them, saith the LORD: there shall be no grapes on the vine, nor figs on the fig tree, and the leaf shall fade; and the things that I have given them shall pass away from them.

 

14 Why do we sit still? assemble yourselves, and let us enter into the defenced cities, and let us be silent there: for the LORD our God hath put us to silence, and given us water of gall to drink, because we have sinned against the LORD.

 

15 We looked for peace, but no good came; and for a time of health, and behold trouble!

 

16 The snorting of his horses was heard from Dan: the whole land trembled at the sound of the neighing of his strong ones; for they are come, and have devoured the land, and all that is in it; the city, and those that dwell therein.

 

17 For, behold, I will send serpents, cockatrices, among you, which will not be charmed, and they shall bite you, saith the LORD.

 

18 ¶ When I would comfort myself against sorrow, my heart is faint in me.

 

19 Behold the voice of the cry of the daughter of my people because of them that dwell in a far country: Is not the LORD in Zion? is not her king in her? Why have they provoked me to anger with their graven images, and with strange vanities?

 

20 The harvest is past, the summer is ended, and we are not saved.

 

21 For the hurt of the daughter of my people am I hurt; I am black; astonishment hath taken hold on me.

 

The gods you worship can’t save you; they can’t do anything for you.  You hear false words of comfort, but there will be no peace or comfort for you.  Verse 20, rituals alone produces nothing.  It’s the same today; simply going through the motions does not produce happiness.  Jeremiah gets after the priests who should be teaching truth but teach the ways of the world, they deceive the people and will be held accountable for their actions.  Going through the rituals (motions) without the true teachings behind them.

 

Who do we worship today?  CEO’s, Hollywood, sports athletes, do they bring happiness? 

 

 

 

The Dangers of
Superficial Church Membership

____________________________

 

 

President Ezra Taft Benson

Heed the Lord’s counsel to the Saints of this dispensation: “Prepare yourselves for the great day of the Lord” (D&C 133:10).  This preparation must consist of more than just casual membership in the Church. You must learn to be guided by personal revelation and the counsel of the living prophet so you will not be deceived.  (“Prepare Yourself for the Great Day of the Lord,” New Era, May 1982, p. 50)

 

Elder Joseph B. Wirthlin

Many years ago, large packs of wolves roamed the countryside in Ukraine, making travel in that part of the world very dangerous. These wolf packs were fearless. They were not intimidated by people nor by any of the weapons available at that time. The only thing that seemed to frighten them was fire. Consequently, travelers who found themselves away from cities developed the common practice of building a large bonfire and keeping it burning through the night. As long as the fire burned brightly, the wolves stayed away. But if it were allowed to burn out and die, the wolves would move in for an attack. Travelers understood that building and maintaining a roaring bonfire was not just a matter of convenience or comfort; it was a matter of survival. (See Mary Pratt Parrish, Ensign, May 1972, p. 25.)

We do not have to protect ourselves from wolf packs as we travel the road of life today, but, in a spiritual sense, we do face the devious wolves of Satan in the forms of temptation, evil, and sin. We live in dangerous times when these ravenous wolves roam the spiritual countryside in search of those who may be weak in faith or feeble in their conviction. In his first epistle, Peter described our "adversary the devil, as a roaring lion [that] walketh about, seeking whom he may devour." (1 Pet. 5:8.) The Lord told the Prophet Joseph Smith that "enemies prowl around thee like wolves for the blood of the lamb." (D&C 122:6.) We are all vulnerable to attack. However, we can fortify ourselves with the protection provided by a burning testimony that, like a bonfire, has been built adequately and maintained carefully.

Unfortunately, some in the Church may believe sincerely that their testimony is a raging bonfire when it really is little more than the faint flickering of a candle. Their faithfulness has more to do with habit than holiness, and their pursuit of personal righteousness almost always takes a back seat to their pursuit of personal interests and pleasure. With such a feeble light of testimony for protection, these travelers on life's highways are easy prey for the wolves of the adversary. ("Spiritual Bonfires of Testimony," Ensign, Nov. 1992, p. 34)

 

Elder Neal A. Maxwell

From Men and Women of Christ:

If we enlist and take the Savior's yoke upon us we "shall find rest unto [our] souls" (Matthew 11:29). If we are only part-time soldiers, though, partially yoked, we experience quite the opposite: frustration, irritation, and the absence of His full grace and spiritual rest. In that case weaknesses persist and satisfactions are intermittent. . . Actually the partially yoked experience little spiritual satisfaction, because they are burdened by carrying the awful weight of the natural man -- without any of the joys that come from progressing toward becoming "the man of Christ." They have scarcely "[begun] to be enlightened" (Alma 32:34). The meek and fully yoked, on the other hand, find God's reassuring grace and see their weakness yielding to strength (see Ether 12:27).

Strange as it seems, a few of the partially yoked, undeservedly wearing the colors of the kingdom, are just close enough to the prescribed path and process to be able to observe in others some of the visible costs of discipleship. Sobered by that observation, they want victory without battle and expect campaign ribbons merely for watching; but there is no witness until after the trial of their faith (see Ether 12:6).

These same Church members know just enough about the doctrines to converse superficially on them, but their scant knowledge about the deep doctrines is inadequate for deep discipleship (see 1 Corinthians 2:10). Thus uninformed about the deep doctrines, they make no deep change in their lives. They lack the faith to "give place" (Alma 32:27) consistently for real discipleship. Such members move out a few hundred yards from the entrance to the straight and narrow path and repose on the first little rise, thinking, "Well, this is all there is to it"; and they end up living far below their possibilities. While not as distant as those King Benjamin described "For how knoweth a man the master whom he has not served, and who is a stranger unto him, and is far from the thoughts and intents of his heart?" (Mosiah 5:13) -- these people are not drawing closer either. (Men and Women of Christ. Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1991, pp. 2-3)

 

From "Overcome ... Even As I Also Overcame":

Events and circumstances in the last days make it imperative for us as members of the Church to become more grounded, rooted, established, and settled (see Col. 1:23; Col. 2:7; 2 Pet. 1:12). Jesus said to His disciples, "settle this in your hearts, that ye will do the things which I shall teach, and command you" (JST Luke 14:28). If not so settled, the turbulence will be severe. If settled, we will not be "tossed to and fro," whether by rumors, false doctrines, or by the behavioral and intellectual fashions of the world. Nor will we get caught up in the "talk show" mentality, spending our time like ancient Athenians "in nothing else, but either to tell, or to hear some new thing" (Acts 17:21). Why be concerned with the passing preferences of the world anyway? "For the fashion of this world passeth away" (1 Cor. 7:31). . . .

Some Church members, alas, are neither reconciled to the will of God nor are they sufficiently settled as to their covenants. . . .

Some give of their time yet withhold themselves, being present without giving of their presence and going through the superficial motions of membership instead of the deep emotions of consecrated discipleship.

Some try to get by with knowing only the headlines of the gospel, not really talking much of Christ or rejoicing in Christ and esteeming lightly His books of scripture which contain and explain His covenants (see 2 Ne. 25:26).

Some are so proud they never learn of obedience and spiritual submissiveness. They will have very arthritic knees on the day when every knee shall bend. There will be no gallery then to play to; all will be participants!

Maintaining Church membership on our own terms, therefore, is not true discipleship.

Real disciples absorb the fiery darts of the adversary by holding aloft the quenching shield of faith with one hand, while holding to the iron rod with the other (see Eph. 6:16; 1 Ne. 15:24; D&C 27:17). There should be no mistaking; it will take both hands! ("Overcome ... Even As I Also Overcame," Ensign, May 1987, p. 70)

 

Joseph Smith

The things of God are of deep import; and time, and experience, and careful and ponderous and solemn thoughts can only find them out. Thy mind, O man! if thou wilt lead a soul unto salvation, must stretch as high as the utmost heavens, and search into and contemplate the darkest abyss, and the broad expanse of eternity--thou must commune with God. How much more dignified and noble are the thoughts of God, than the vain imaginations of the human heart! (History of the Church 3:295)

  Jeremiah 9 – Scattering is going to happen

Jeremiah's Laments

 

"When I would comfort myself against sorrow, my heart is faint in me. . . . The harvest is past, the summer is ended, and we are not saved. For the hurt of the daughter of my people am I hurt; I am black; astonishment hath taken hold on me. . . . Oh that my head were waters, and mine eyes a fountain of tears, that I might weep day and night for the slain of the daughter of my people" (Jer. 8:18-9:1). With these words Jeremiah revealed to us that he was a man with much emotion and compassion about the events that he witnessed in the past, present, and through his prophetic gift, the future. We are reminded of the prophet Mormon, who also spent his life's work crying repentance to his unrepentant people, only to witness their destruction: "My soul was rent with anguish, because of the slain of my people, and I cried: O ye fair ones, how could ye have departed from the ways of the Lord! O ye fair ones, how could ye have rejected that Jesus, who stood with open arms to receive you! Behold, if ye had not done this, ye would not have fallen. But behold, ye are fallen, and I mourn your loss" (Morm. 6:16-18).

 

Jeremiah the prophet saw life from the human perspective and at the same time was compelled to view it from God's perspective through the message that he bore. On the one hand, he viewed the coming disaster with compassion and sorrow; on the other hand, he felt righteous indignation as he considered the unfaithfulness of his people, which he longed to escape: "Oh that I had in the wilderness a lodging place of wayfaring men; that I might leave my people, and go from them! for they be all adulterers, an assembly of treacherous men. And they bend their tongues like their bow for lies: but they are not valiant for the truth upon the earth; for they proceed from evil to evil" (Jer. 9:2-3). In short, he understood that they deserved the impending judgment. Such laments reveal his mixed feelings about his people.

 

At the same time, we are presented throughout the book of Jeremiah with a series of personal laments — termed by many the "confessions," which are quite unlike anything else in the biblical prophecies — in which Jeremiah revealed the personal struggles and suffering that he as servant of the Lord was called to endure. Through these laments Jeremiah sought for an understanding of many of life's most difficult questions. They remind us of the probing of Job in his trials and of Joseph Smith in Liberty Jail. For some of the laments we are presented with a historical context; for others, we can only imagine. To some of these complaints the Lord responded; to others, he was silent. A look at these haunting poetic passages helps us to appreciate better the great human drama of prophets, the burden of the uncompromising call of the Lord, and most of all, the importance of a dynamic relationship with our Maker which can help us all to "endure to the end." There are at least six examples of personal laments, each of which we will examine, identifying the issues that Jeremiah discussed and the divine answers to such questions.

(Kent P. Jackson, ed., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 4: 1 Kings to Malachi [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1993], 228.)

(Jeremiah 10:1-5.)

 

1 Hear ye the word which the LORD speaketh unto you, O house of Israel:

 

2 Thus saith the LORD, Learn not the way of the heathen, and be not dismayed at the signs of heaven; for the heathen are dismayed at them.

 

3 For the customs of the people are vain: for one cutteth a tree out of the forest, the work of the hands of the workman, with the axe.

 

4 They deck it with silver and with gold; they fasten it with nails and with hammers, that it move not.

 

5 They are upright as the palm tree, but speak not: they must needs be borne, because they cannot go. Be not afraid of them; for they cannot do evil, neither also is it in them to do good.

 

 

These verses have nothing to do with Christmas.  This is about idol worship.  They chopped down a living tree and decorated it with gold and silver, this was about the worshipping of Ashtoreth, the female deity.  The Hebrew words for palm tree and scarecrow are separated by their vowels; this is a mistake in translation,

 

 (Jeremiah 10:6-13.)

 

6 Forasmuch as there is none like unto thee, O LORD; thou art great, and thy name is great in might.

 

7 Who would not fear thee, O King of nations? for to thee doth it appertain: forasmuch as among all the wise men of the nations, and in all their kingdoms, there is none like unto thee.

 

8 But they are altogether brutish and foolish: the stock is a doctrine of vanities.

 

9 Silver spread into plates is brought from Tarshish, and gold from Uphaz, the work of the workman, and of the hands of the founder: blue and purple is their clothing: they are all the work of cunning men.

 

10 But the LORD is the true God, he is the living God, and an everlasting king: at his wrath the earth shall tremble, and the nations shall not be able to abide his indignation.

 

11 Thus shall ye say unto them, The gods that have not made the heavens and the earth, even they shall perish from the earth, and from under these heavens.

 

12 He hath made the earth by his power, he hath established the world by his wisdom, and hath stretched out the heavens by his discretion.

 

13 When he uttereth his voice, there is a multitude of waters in the heavens, and he causeth the vapours to ascend from the ends of the earth; he maketh lightnings with rain, and bringeth forth the wind out of his treasures.

 

and it’s really a scarecrow.

 

 The difference between idol worship and Jehovah worship!

 

Verse 21 – How wicked the priests were.

 

(Jeremiah 11:1-15.)

 

1 The word that came to Jeremiah from the LORD, saying,

 

2 Hear ye the words of this covenant, and speak unto the men of Judah, and to the inhabitants of Jerusalem;

 

3 And say thou unto them, Thus saith the LORD God of Israel; Cursed be the man that obeyeth not the words of this covenant,

 

4 Which I commanded your fathers in the day that I brought them forth out of the land of Egypt, from the iron furnace, saying, Obey my voice, and do them, according to all which I command you: so shall ye be my people, and I will be your God:

 

5 That I may perform the oath which I have sworn unto your fathers, to give them a land flowing with milk and honey, as it is this day. Then answered I, and said, So be it, O LORD.

 

6 Then the LORD said unto me, Proclaim all these words in the cities of Judah, and in the streets of Jerusalem, saying, Hear ye the words of this covenant, and do them.

 

7 For I earnestly protested unto your fathers in the day that I brought them up out of the land of Egypt, even unto this day, rising early and protesting, saying, Obey my voice.

 

8 Yet they obeyed not, nor inclined their ear, but walked every one in the imagination of their evil heart: therefore I will bring upon them all the words of this covenant, which I commanded them to do; but they did them not.

 

9 And the LORD said unto me, A conspiracy is found among the men of Judah, and among the inhabitants of Jerusalem.

 

10 They are turned back to the iniquities of their forefathers, which refused to hear my words; and they went after other gods to serve them: the house of Israel and the house of Judah have broken my covenant which I made with their fathers.

 

11 ¶ Therefore thus saith the LORD, Behold, I will bring evil upon them, which they shall not be able to escape; and though they shall cry unto me, I will not hearken unto them.

 

12 Then shall the cities of Judah and inhabitants of Jerusalem go, and cry unto the gods unto whom they offer incense: but they shall not save them at all in the time of their trouble.

 

13 For according to the number of thy cities were thy gods, O Judah; and according to the number of the streets of Jerusalem have ye set up altars to that shameful thing, even altars to burn incense unto Baal.

 

14 Therefore pray not thou for this people, neither lift up a cry or prayer for them: for I will not hear them in the time that they cry unto me for their trouble.

 

15 What hath my beloved to do in mine house, seeing she hath wrought lewdness with many, and the holy flesh is passed from thee? when thou doest evil, then thou rejoicest.

 

The iron furnace is Egypt; it is the place where Israel is forged as a nation.  Jacob goes there to survive; he would have died with his family if they stayed in Canaan.

 

The people are cursed for breaking their covenants; there are consequences for our actions.

 

Jeremiah prophesied from about 627-580 B.C. (Jeremiah 1:1-3). fn One of the themes of Jeremiah, as he was commissioned in his prophetic call, was to "root out, and to pull down, and to destroy, and to throw down, to build, and to plant" (Jeremiah 1:10). Jeremiah was to prophesy destruction and restoration and the corresponding horticultural imagery of "rooting out" and "planting" pervade his book. fn While Hosea used only the positive images of the basic allegory and Isaiah featured both the positive and negative, Jeremiah utilized only the negative in his use of the olive tree. But he does prophesy of the restoration of the gospel and the gathering of Israel in the latter days in terms of "sowing" and "planting" (Jeremiah 31:5; 31:27-29; 32:41). Because Jeremiah was a prophet in times of lamentation and judgment, it is not surprising that he used the allegory of the olive tree to heighten his message of catastrophic suffering for breaking the covenant with the Lord. The main text in this regard from Jeremiah is as follows:

 

14 Therefore pray not thou for this people, neither lift up a cry or prayer for them: for I will not hear them in the time that they cry unto me for their trouble.

15 What hath my beloved to do in mine house, seeing she hath wrought lewdness with many, and the holy flesh is passed from thee? when thou doest evil, then thou rejoicest.

16 The Lord called thy name, A green olive tree, fair, and of goodly fruit: with the noise of a great tumult he hath kindled fire upon it, and the branches of it are broken.

17 For the Lord of hosts, that planted thee, hath pronounced evil against thee, for the evil of the house of Israel and of the house of Judah, which they have done against themselves to provoke me to anger in offering incense unto Baal.

(Jeremiah 11:14-17.)

 

The general image projected here is that of a tree struck by lightning. Although the Hebrew text is quite corrupt and therefore difficult to interpret, it begins with a reference to the fact that the Lord in the past had "called thy name a green olive tree, fair and of goodly fruit." Clearly Jeremiah reminds his audience of a known metaphor, which could have been known to them from Psalm 52 or a text such as that of Zenos.

 

Jeremiah then moves directly to the judgment motif: "With the noise of a great tumult he hath kindled fire upon it, and the branches of it are broken" (11:16). The Septuagint version reads, "The branches are become good for nothing [echreiothesan]," which is a reading close to Zenos, "And now all the trees of my vineyard are good for nothing" (Jacob 5:42). Behind the Hebrew and Greek versions of this text, there were evidently two traditions in ancient Israel about the fate of these branches: were they "broken off" or did they "become good for nothing"? Perhaps both of these traditions trace their origins to the allegory of Zenos, for Zenos also refers to the "natural branches [that] had been broken off" (Jacob 5:30), as well as becoming "good for nothing" (Jacob 5:42).

 

Next, Jeremiah reminds his audience that the Lord had planted his people (Jeremiah 11:17), clearly in the tradition of Exodus 15:17 (cf. Jacob 5:3). And Jeremiah is able to accuse the people of the "evil which they have done against themselves," an accusation that receives no further explanation and thus assumes everyone understands the responsibility for the corruption of the olive tree lies within the house of Israel itself, or as Zenos says, "Taking strength unto themselves, . . . is not this the cause that the trees of thy vineyard have become corrupted?" (Jacob 5:48).

 

In the end, the people plotted against Jeremiah by throwing his allegory back at him. They said, "Let us destroy the tree with the fruit thereof and let us cut him off from the land of the living" (Jeremiah 11:19). Obviously two can play the allegory game, and one way to eliminate the problems caused by Jeremiah was to eliminate Jeremiah himself. The spontaneous use of the tree and fruit imagery by the people themselves in response to Jeremiah shows once again the great extent to which this imagery had become common parlance in pre-exilic Israel.

 

 

(Stephen D. Ricks and John W. Welch, eds., The Allegory of the Olive Tree: The Olive, the Bible, and Jacob 5 [Salt Lake City and Provo: Deseret Book Co., Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies, 1994], .)

 

(Jeremiah 12:1.)

 

1 Righteous art thou, O LORD, when I plead with thee: yet let me talk with thee of thy judgments: Wherefore doth the way of the wicked prosper? wherefore are all they happy that deal very treacherously?

 

Like a Lamb to the Slaughter (Jer. 11:18-12:6)

 

The Lord revealed to Jeremiah the sins of his people as well as the judgment that was to come. Jeremiah recorded: "And the Lord hath given me knowledge of it, and I know it: then thou shewedst me their doings" (Jer. 11:18). Because Jeremiah had faithfully delivered this message, it was he who would suffer, and in fact, there were those who sought his life. He pleaded his innocence: "But I was like a lamb or an ox that is brought to the slaughter" (Jer. 8:19) — words that remind us of the image of Christ as the Suffering Servant (Isa. 53:7) and that were quoted by the Prophet Joseph Smith as he went to Carthage (D&C 135:4). fn It was Jeremiah's own community that was most indignant. He cried to the Lord for "vengeance on them: for unto thee have I revealed my cause" (Jer. 11:20). The Lord assured him that divine justice would prevail, and in this case it would be in the not-too-distant future: "The men of Anathoth, that seek thy life, saying, Prophesy not in the name of the Lord, that thou die not by our hand: . . . Behold, I will punish them: the young men shall die by the sword; their sons and their daughters shall die by famine: And there shall be no remnant of them: for I will bring evil upon the men of Anathoth, even the year of their visitation" (Jer. 11:21-23).

 

But Jeremiah's complaint did not end there, and he asked the Lord, just as did Job and the psalmist (Job 21; Ps. 73), the age-old question: "Wherefore doth the way of the wicked prosper? wherefore are all they happy that deal very treacherously?" (Jer. 12:1). The Lord responded, much as he did to Job, with questions, two enigmatic proverbs: "If thou hast run with the footmen, and they have wearied thee, then how canst thou contend with horses? And if in the land of peace, wherein thou trustedst, they wearied thee, then how wilt thou do in the swelling of Jordan?" (Jer. 12:5).

 

The answer is clear, though the implications not comforting: for Jeremiah the challenges and trials had just begun.

 

 

(Kent P. Jackson, ed., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 4: 1 Kings to Malachi [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1993], 230.)

 

 

Why do the wicked prosper?

 

Materialism

 

The Book of Mormon tells of a time when the church of God "began to fail in its progress" because "the people of the church began to . . . set their hearts upon riches and upon the vain things of the world" (Alma 4:8,10). Those who set their hearts upon the things of the world usually focus on some combination of that worldly quartet of property, pride, prominence, and power. When attitudes or priorities are fixed on the acquisition, use, or possession of property, we call that condition materialism. (Pride is discussed in the next chapter.)

 

In descending order of intensity, materialism may be an obsession, a preoccupation, or merely a strong interest. Whatever its degree, an interest becomes materialism when it is intense enough to override priorities that should be paramount.

 

From the emphasis given to this subject in the scriptures, it appears that materialism has been one of the greatest challenges to the children of God in all ages of time. Greed, the ugly face of materialism in action, has been one of Satan's most effective weapons in corrupting men and turning their hearts from God.

 

In the first of the Ten Commandments, accepted as fundamental religious law by Christians and Jews alike, God commands: "Thou shalt have no other gods before me" (Exodus 20:3). This is obviously much more than a prohibition against the overt worship of images like the god Baal. (Idol worship is the subject of the second commandment, "Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image" [Exodus 20:4].) The first commandment is a comprehensive prohibition against the pursuit of any goal or priority ahead of God. The first commandment prohibits materialism.

 

The Savior and his Apostles gave many warnings against setting our hearts upon the treasures of this world.

 

Jesus taught that we should not lay up for ourselves "treasures upon earth, where moth and rust doth corrupt, and where thieves break through and steal: . . . For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also." (Matthew 6:19,21.) In other words, the treasures of our hearts—our priorities—should not be the destructible and temporary things of this world.

 

In elaborating the parable of the sower, the Savior explained that the seed that fell "among the thorns" signified the circumstance of one who heard the message of the gospel, but "the care of this world, and the deceitfulness of riches, choke the word, and he becometh unfruitful" (Matthew 13:22). We have all seen examples of this pattern of stunted growth. After the precious seed (the message of the gospel) has begun to grow in the lives of some persons, they are diverted by their attention to the things of the world, and their spiritual fruits are choked out by "the deceitfulness of riches."

 

The deceitfulness of riches can choke out the fruits of the gospel in many ways. A person who covets the wealth of another will suffer spiritually. A person who has wealth and then loses it and becomes embittered and hateful is also a victim of the deceitfulness of riches.

 

Another victim is the person who becomes resentful of the wealth of the wicked. The prophet Jeremiah gave voice to the old question, "Wherefore doth the way of the wicked prosper? wherefore are all they happy that deal very treacherously?" (Jeremiah 12:1.) Those who brood over the prosperity or seeming happiness of the wicked put too much emphasis on material things. They can be deceived because their priorities are too concentrated on worldly wealth.

 

Another victim of the deceitfulness of riches is the person who consciously or unconsciously feels guilt at having failed to acquire the property or prominence the world credits as the indicia of success.

 

Those who preach the gospel of success and the theology of prosperity are suffering from "the deceitfulness of riches" and from supposing that "gain is godliness" (1 Timothy 6:5). The possession of wealth or the acquisition of significant income is not a mark of heavenly favor, and their absence is not evidence of heavenly disfavor. Riches can be among the blessings that follow right behavior—such as the payment of tithing (Malachi 3:9-12)—but riches can also be acquired through the luck of a prospector or as the fruits of dishonesty.

 

Elder Neal A. Maxwell reminds us that those who trust in riches fail to see the real purpose of life :

 

Jesus counseled us, too, concerning materialism and "the deceitfulness of riches" (Matthew 13:22), and of how hard it is for those who trust in riches and materialism to enter into the kingdom of God. (See Luke 18:24.) . . . Can those who are diverted by riches or the search for riches and thus fail to discern the real purposes of life be safely trusted with greater dominions which call for even greater discernment? "And he that overcometh, and keepeth my works unto the end, to him will I give power over the nations." (Revelation 2:26.) ("Thanks Be to God," Ensign, July 1982, p. 53.)

 

Another lesson on materialism is taught in the example of the follower who asked the Savior what he should do to "inherit eternal life." After this questioner represented that he had kept all the commandments from his youth, the Savior said: "One thing thou lackest: go thy way, sell whatsoever thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come, take up the cross, and follow me." When the follower heard this, "he was sad at that saying, and went away grieved: for he had great possessions." Seeing this, Jesus said, "How hard it is for them that trust in riches to enter into the kingdom of God!" (Mark 10:17, 21, 22, 24).

 

This man's failing was not his possession of riches but his attitude toward them. As was demonstrated by his apparent failure to follow the Savior's challenge, he still lacked the attitude toward the things of this world that is required to "inherit eternal life." As the Prophet Joseph Smith taught in our own day, "A religion that does not require the sacrifice of all things never has power sufficient to produce the faith necessary unto life and salvation" (Lectures on Faith 6:7).

 

In the midst of prophetic utterances about his Second Coming, the Savior warned that we should not be so pre-occupied with the cares of this life that we are unprepared for that great day: "And take heed to yourselves, lest at any time your hearts be overcharged with surfeiting, and drunkenness, and cares of this life, and so that day come upon you unawares" (Luke 21:34).

 

The Savior taught the multitude to seek treasures in heaven rather than treasures on earth and cautioned them that they "cannot serve God and Mammon" (3 Nephi 13:24; Matthew 6:24). After teaching this general principle, he applied it specifically to the leaders he had called as full-time ministers. Jesus "looked upon the twelve whom he had chosen" and told them how far they must go in putting aside the priorities of the world:

 

Remember the words which I have spoken. For behold, ye are they whom I have chosen to minister unto this people. Therefore I say unto you, take no thought for your life, what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink; nor yet for your body, what ye shall put on. Is not the life more than meat, and the body than raiment? (3 Nephi 13:25; see also Matthew 6:25).

 

 

(Dallin H. Oaks, Pure in Heart [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1988], 73.)

 

 

 

 

Jeremiah 13-20

 

October 5, 2006

 

 

 

Bruce told us his uncle and father-in-law died this week and he will be speaking at the funerals.  Class will be short tonight. The righteous are called to the spirit world by the Lord to do work there.  He reminded us of a story by Wilford Woodruff.

 

Now, having said so much on that subject, I want to say to my brethren and sisters, that we are placed upon the earth to build up Zion, to build up the kingdom of God. The greater proportion of the male members of Zion, who have arrived at the years of early manhood, bear some portion of the Holy Priesthood. Here is a kingdom of Priests raised up by the power of God to take hold and build up the kingdom of God. The same Priesthood exists on the other side of the vail. Every man who is faithful in his quorum here will join his quorum there. When a man dies and his body is laid in the tomb, he does not lose his position. The Prophet Joseph Smith held the keys of this dispensation on this side of the vail, and he will hold them throughout the countless ages of eternity. He went into the spirit world to unlock the prison doors and to preach the Gospel to the millions of spirits who are in darkness, and every Apostle, every Seventy, every Elder, etc., who has died in the faith as soon as he passes to the other side of the vail, enters into the work of the ministry, and there is a thousand times more to preach there than there is here. I have felt of late as if our brethren on the other side of the vail had held a council, and that they had said to this one, and that one, "Cease thy work on earth, come hence, we need help," and they have called this man and that man. It has appeared so to me in seeing the many men who have been called from our midst lately. Perhaps I may be permitted to relate a circumstance with which I am acquainted in relation to Bishop Roskelley, of Smithfield, Cache Valley. On one occasion he was suddenly taken very sick—near to death's door. While he lay in this condition, President Peter Maughan, who was dead, came to him and said: "Brother Roskelley, we held a council on the other side of the vail. I have had a great deal to do, and I have the privilege of coming here to appoint one man to come and help. I have had three names given to me in council, and you are one of them. I want to inquire into your circumstances." The Bishop told him what he had to do, and they conversed together as one man would converse with another. President Maughan then said to him: "I think I will not call you. I think you are wanted here more than perhaps one of the others." Bishop Roskelley got well from that hour. Very soon after, the second man was taken sick, but not being able to exercise sufficient faith, Brother Roskelley did not go to him. By and by this man recovered, and on meeting Brother Roskelley he said: "Brother Maughan came to me the other night and told me he was sent to call one man from the ward," and he named two men as had been done to Brother Roskelley. A few days afterwards the third man was taken sick and died. Now, I name this to show a principle. They have work on the other side of the vail; and they want men, and they call them. And that was my view in regard to Brother George A. Smith. When he was almost at death's door, Brother Cannon administered to him, and in thirty minutes he was up and ate breakfast with his family. We labored with him in this way, but ultimately, as you know, he died. But it taught me a lesson. I felt that man was wanted behind the vail. We labored also with Brother Pratt; he, too, was wanted behind the vail.

 

Now, my brethren and sisters, those of us who are left here have a great work to do. We have been raised up of the Lord to take this kingdom and bear it off. This is our duty; but if we neglect our duty and set our hearts upon the things of this world, we will be sorry for it. We ought to understand the responsibility that rests upon us. We should gird up our loins and put on the whole armor of God. We should rear temples to the name of the Most High God, that we may redeem the dead.. It is the work of God. Joseph Smith was appointed by the Lord before he was born as much as Jeremiah was. The Lord told Jeremiah—"Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee, and I ordained thee a Prophet unto the nations." He was commanded to warn the inhabitants of Jerusalem of their wickedness. He felt it a hard task, but ultimately he did as he was commanded. So I say with regard to Joseph Smith. He received his appointment from before the foundation of the world, and he came forth in the due time of the Lord to establish this work on the earth. And so it is the case with tens of thousands of the Elders of Israel. The Lord Almighty has conferred upon you the Holy Priesthood and made you the instrument in His hands to build up this kingdom. Do we contemplate these things as fully as we ought? Do we realize that the eyes of all the heavenly hosts are over us? Then let us do our duty. Let us keep the commandments of God, let us be faithful to the end, so that when we go into the spirit world and look back upon our history we may be satisfied.

 

 

(Journal of Discourses, 26 vols. [London: Latter-day Saints' Book Depot, 1854-1886], 22: 334.)

 

 

 

(Jeremiah 13:1-27.)

 

1 Thus saith the LORD unto me, Go and get thee a linen girdle, and put it upon thy loins, and put it not in water.

 

2 So I got a girdle according to the word of the LORD, and put it on my loins.

 

3 And the word of the LORD came unto me the second time, saying,

 

4 Take the girdle that thou hast got, which is upon thy loins, and arise, go to Euphrates, and hide it there in a hole of the rock.

 

5 So I went, and hid it by Euphrates, as the LORD commanded me.

 

6 And it came to pass after many days, that the LORD said unto me, Arise, go to Euphrates, and take the girdle from thence, which I commanded thee to hide there.

 

7 Then I went to Euphrates, and digged, and took the girdle from the place where I had hid it: and, behold, the girdle was marred, it was profitable for nothing.

 

8 Then the word of the LORD came unto me, saying,

 

9 Thus saith the LORD, After this manner will I mar the pride of Judah, and the great pride of Jerusalem.

 

10 This evil people, which refuse to hear my words, which walk in the imagination of their heart, and walk after other gods, to serve them, and to worship them, shall even be as this girdle, which is good for nothing.

 

11 For as the girdle cleaveth to the loins of a man, so have I caused to cleave unto me the whole house of Israel and the whole house of Judah, saith the LORD; that they might be unto me for a people, and for a name, and for a praise, and for a glory: but they would not hear.

 

12 ¶ Therefore thou shalt speak unto them this word; Thus saith the LORD God of Israel, Every bottle shall be filled with wine: and they shall say unto thee, Do we not certainly know that every bottle shall be filled with wine?

 

13 Then shalt thou say unto them, Thus saith the LORD, Behold, I will fill all the inhabitants of this land, even the kings that sit upon David's throne, and the priests, and the prophets, and all the inhabitants of Jerusalem, with drunkenness.

 

14 And I will dash them one against another, even the fathers and the sons together, saith the LORD: I will not pity, nor spare, nor have mercy, but destroy them.

 

15 ¶ Hear ye, and give ear; be not proud: for the LORD hath spoken.

 

16 Give glory to the LORD your God, before he cause darkness, and before your feet stumble upon the dark mountains, and, while ye look for light, he turn it into the shadow of death, and make it gross darkness.

 

17 But if ye will not hear it, my soul shall weep in secret places for your pride; and mine eye shall weep sore, and run down with tears, because the LORD's flock is carried away captive.

 

18 Say unto the king and to the queen, Humble yourselves, sit down: for your principalities shall come down, even the crown of your glory.

 

19 The cities of the south shall be shut up, and none shall open them: Judah shall be carried away captive all of it, it shall be wholly carried away captive.

 

20 Lift up your eyes, and behold them that come from the north: where is the flock that was given thee, thy beautiful flock?

 

21 What wilt thou say when he shall punish thee? for thou hast taught them to be captains, and as chief over thee: shall not sorrows take thee, as a woman in travail?

 

22 ¶ And if thou say in thine heart, Wherefore come these things upon me? For the greatness of thine iniquity are thy skirts discovered, and thy heels made bare.

 

23 Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good, that are accustomed to do evil.

 

24 Therefore will I scatter them as the stubble that passeth away by the wind of the wilderness.

 

25 This is thy lot, the portion of thy measures from me, saith the LORD; because thou hast forgotten me, and trusted in falsehood.

 

26 Therefore will I discover thy skirts upon thy face, that thy shame may appear.

 

27 I have seen thine adulteries, and thy neighings, the lewdness of thy whoredom, and thine abominations on the hills in the fields. Woe unto thee, O Jerusalem! wilt thou not be made clean? when shall it once be?

 

This chapter consists of 5 warnings to the people, and object lessons. 

 

Exactly where did Jeremiah go to perform the 1st act?  If it was all the way to the Euphrates River in present day Iraq, that was quite a hike, it must have taken months, it was a 1000 mile round trip, twice, it would have taken 2-3 months for this journey. What a vacation.

 

Verses 1-12 – 1st Warning

 

Source: Jeremiah 13:1-10 Prophet: Jeremiah

 

Messenger/Revelation Formula: "Thus saith the Lord unto me . . . And the word of the Lord came unto me the second time, saying" (Jeremiah 13:1, 3)

 

Object or Person Used as a Symbol: Linen girdle

 

Symbolic Action: Jeremiah clothes himself with a linen girdle, removes the girdle, and then hides it in the hole of a rock

 

Prophecy: Just as the people of Judah were once whole like the linen girdle, so will they become marred and rotten like the girdle that was placed in the rock

 

 

(Thy People Shall Be My People and Thy God My God: The 22d Annual Sidney B. Sperry Symposium [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1994], 93.)

 

 

The linen garment was like our present day underwear.  The girdle was useless after he retrieved it from the rock; Judah will be marred in the same fashion.

 

Isaiah 7:1 – Isaiah talked with Ahaz about his alliance with Assyria, telling him not to do it. He goes ahead with the alliance with Israel and Syria against Assyria.  Israel was clean and pure after making the covenant with Moses and Joshua 18, but with Assyrian influences on the people they will become corrupted, polluted and marred, good for nothing.  In the days of Joshua they were clean, they were close to the Lord, and they were His covenant people.

 

Jeremiah's Symbolic Acts

 

Many important oracles of judgment are recorded in memorable imagery throughout the book of Jeremiah. I will concentrate on three prophecies that were accompanied by symbolic acts or allegories. The symbolic act, a dramatization of a prophetic message, was already a well-known phenomenon associated with the prophets, as, for example, the prophet Zedekiah's donning a set of iron horns (1 Kgs. 22:11), Hosea's marriage with Gomer (Hosea 1-3), Isaiah's naming his sons (Isa. 7-8), and Isaiah's walking around Jerusalem naked and barefoot (Isa. 20). Likewise the ministry of Ezekiel was characterized by several significant symbolic acts: lying on his side for a prescribed period (Ezek. 4), digging a hole through a wall (Ezek. 12), and refraining from mourning for his wife (Ezek. 24:15-27). Jeremiah participated in three such symbolic acts, one involving a linen girdle (Jer. 13:2Jer. 13:1-11), another potter at his wheel (Jer. 18), and still another potter's earthen bottle (Jer. 19-20), which the Lord interpreted for him allegorically. fn A brief look at these incidents can give us a further taste of the nature of Jeremiah's prophecies.

 

The Linen Girdle (Jer. 13:1-11)

 

The Lord commanded Jeremiah to put a linen girdle on his loins and journey to the Euphrates, a distance of between three and four hundred miles, and hide the girdle in a hole in a rock. This Jeremiah did. fn After many days the Lord then told him to go and retrieve his girdle. Jeremiah discovered when he dug it up that "the girdle was marred, it was profitable for nothing" (Jer. 13:7). The Lord explained: "After this manner will I mar the pride of Judah and the great pride of Jerusalem" (Jer. 13:9). At one level the meaning is clear: if Judah were to be involved with the Euphrates it would be to her downfall. The Lord went on to explain that Israel and Judah were like the girdle in that they were wrapped around the Lord as the girdle had been wrapped around Jeremiah (Jer. 13:11). Perhaps this is a reference to the fact that when Israel or Judah were no longer faithful to the Lord—symbolized by being wrapped around the waist—then they really were worthless and would eventually be destroyed. A nation that refused to hearken to the Lord and worshiped other gods was to the Lord God of Israel just like the girdle—useless. Some have seen in the reference to the Euphrates an allusion to the eventual exile of the people there.

 

There is no record that anyone witnessed this event other than Jeremiah, and we can only speculate what kind of an impact this had on his prophetic understanding. Certainly it would have illustrated the close relationship between the Lord and his people and the need for them to remain pure in order to be of any use or value to the Lord.

 

 

(Kent P. Jackson, ed., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 4: 1 Kings to Malachi [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1993], 234.)

 

 

Verses 12-14 – 2nd Warning

 

Israel is like a jug or bag of wine.  There wasn’t much to drink, so drunkenness was a problem.  There weren’t many options to drink.  The water and milk were not always safe to drink; they could go bad on you.   Remember the Word of Wisdom, we aren’t to drink wine made by our enemies, and Joseph Smith drank wine.  In our modern era we are commanded not to drink it.  Yet at the sacrament meeting when the Lord returns it will be served.  You can’t stop the destruction of Jerusalem, it is drunk with wickedness. 

 

54:16 I have created the smith/I have created the waster. The Lord has created both the man who creates and the man who destroys. All are subject to God's power (for God as a destroyer, see Jer. 13:7-14; 18:4).

(Donald W. Parry, Jay A. Parry, and Tina M. Peterson, Understanding Isaiah [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1998], 487.)

 

 

John the Baptist didn’t drink because of his vow, but Jesus drank and the people didn’t listen to Him either.  Matthew 11.  Modern members have a hard time thinking of Jesus drinking wine.  The practice of using wine stopped with President Grant.

 

Verses 15-17 – 3rd Warning – Enmity and Pride

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 1:33.)

 

33 And he that repents not, from him shall be taken even the light which he has received; for my Spirit shall not always strive with man, saith the Lord of Hosts.

 

 

Better listen to God before there is total darkness.

 

Judah turned against God on purpose, Jehoiakim turned against the reforms of his father Josiah on purpose, its enmity and pride that drive this attitude.  Let’s pacify Jehovah, we worship other gods, and we will worship Jehovah along with the others, what’s wrong with that?!  Everything!

 

Verse 18 – 4th Warning

 

King and Queen were Jehoiakim and his wife who were taken captive to Babylon; he was later released but not allowed to go back to Jerusalem. A whole host was taken out, Ezekiel, Daniel etc you take the leaders away not the peasantry, and they stay around to work.

 

 

 Verses 20-22 – 5th Warning

 

Jerusalem asked why is this happening to me?  The brutal violation of the city, your gross wickedness is the reason.

 

The perfect question of verse 27

 

 

(Jeremiah 14:1-22.)

 

1 The word of the LORD that came to Jeremiah concerning the dearth.

 

2 Judah mourneth, and the gates thereof languish; they are black unto the ground; and the cry of Jerusalem is gone up.

 

3 And their nobles have sent their little ones to the waters: they came to the pits, and found no water; they returned with their vessels empty; they were ashamed and confounded, and covered their heads.

 

4 Because the ground is chapt, for there was no rain in the earth, the plowmen were ashamed, they covered their heads.

 

5 Yea, the hind also calved in the field, and forsook it, because there was no grass.

 

6 And the wild asses did stand in the high places, they snuffed up the wind like dragons; their eyes did fail, because there was no grass.

 

7 ¶ O LORD, though our iniquities testify against us, do thou it for thy name's sake: for our backslidings are many; we have sinned against thee.

 

8 O the hope of Israel, the saviour thereof in time of trouble, why shouldest thou be as a stranger in the land, and as a wayfaring man that turneth aside to tarry for a night?

 

9 Why shouldest thou be as a man astonied, as a mighty man that cannot save? yet thou, O LORD, art in the midst of us, and we are called by thy name; leave us not.

 

10 ¶ Thus saith the LORD unto this people, Thus have they loved to wander, they have not refrained their feet, therefore the LORD doth not accept them; he will now remember their iniquity, and visit their sins.

 

11 Then said the LORD unto me, Pray not for this people for their good.

 

12 When they fast, I will not hear their cry; and when they offer burnt offering and an oblation, I will not accept them: but I will consume them by the sword, and by the famine, and by the pestilence.

 

13 ¶ Then said I, Ah, Lord GOD! behold, the prophets say unto them, Ye shall not see the sword, neither shall ye have famine; but I will give you assured peace in this place.

 

14 Then the LORD said unto me, The prophets prophesy lies in my name: I sent them not, neither have I commanded them, neither spake unto them: they prophesy unto you a false vision and divination, and a thing of nought, and the deceit of their heart.

 

15 Therefore thus saith the LORD concerning the prophets that prophesy in my name, and I sent them not, yet they say, Sword and famine shall not be in this land; By sword and famine shall those prophets be consumed.

 

16 And the people to whom they prophesy shall be cast out in the streets of Jerusalem because of the famine and the sword; and they shall have none to bury them, them, their wives, nor their sons, nor their daughters: for I will pour their wickedness upon them.

 

17 ¶ Therefore thou shalt say this word unto them; Let mine eyes run down with tears night and day, and let them not cease: for the virgin daughter of my people is broken with a great breach, with a very grievous blow.

 

18 If I go forth into the field, then behold the slain with the sword! and if I enter into the city, then behold them that are sick with famine! yea, both the prophet and the priest go about into a land that they know not.

 

19 Hast thou utterly rejected Judah? hath thy soul lothed Zion? why hast thou smitten us, and there is no healing for us? we looked for peace, and there is no good; and for the time of healing, and behold trouble!

 

20 We acknowledge, O LORD, our wickedness, and the iniquity of our fathers: for we have sinned against thee.

 

21 Do not abhor us, for thy name's sake, do not disgrace the throne of thy glory: remember, break not thy covenant with us.

 

22 Are there any among the vanities of the Gentiles that can cause rain? or can the heavens give showers? art not thou he, O LORD our God? therefore we will wait upon thee: for thou hast made all these things.

 

There was a famine in the land; and Jeremiah is suffering with the people the Lord intended to humble the people to come to Him.  The people were not sorry for their sins; they were disappointed and upset living with the drought.

 

The Prophet Jeremiah, who lived in Jerusalem at the same time as did the Prophet Lehi, the scholarly ancestor of both the Nephites and the Lamanites, exclaimed, "How long shall the land mourn . . . for the wickedness of them that dwell therein?" (Jer. 12:4) Also, he said, "Judah mourneth, and the gates thereof languish . . . and the cry of Jerusalem is gone up." (Jer. 14:2) In spite of the words of warning uttered ceaselessly by the prophets, the Jews spasmodically continued in wickedness. At length the anger of the Lord was inflamed against them, and again His voice came to them through His holy prophets, "Thou hast forsaken Me . . . thou art gone backward: therefore will I stretch out My hand against thee, and destroy thee; I am weary with repenting." ( Jer. 15:6 ) In another place the Lord said, "I will not pity, nor spare, nor have mercy." (Ibid. 13:14)

 

When the Lord said, "I am weary with repenting," He meant just this: Often He had stayed His hand in punishing His Chosen People because they promised to turn from their wicked ways and seek Him. Just as often their promises were vain. They continued in the wicked course they pursued. Now the Lord had proved their perfidy and now He refused longer to withhold His anger. His patience with them was exhausted.

 

 

(George Reynolds and Janne M. Sjodahl, Commentary on the Book of Mormon, edited and arranged by Philip C. Reynolds, 7 vols. [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1955-1961], 4: 214.)

 

 

Verse 6 – Snuffed up the wind = panting

 

From all of the foregoing it is apparent that whenever Jehovah says, "Thou art my people" (Isa. 51:16); or whenever the people say of Jehovah, "We are his people, and the sheep of his pasture" (Ps. 100:3); or when they say, "Thou, O Lord, art in the midst of us, and we are called by thy name; leave us not" (Jer. 14:9Jer. 14:9); or "Our adversaries have trodden down thy sanctuary. We are thine: thou never barest rule over them; they were not called by thy name" (Isa. 63:18-19); or when Jehovah promises (of gathered Israel), "They shall know that my name is The Lord" (Jer. 16:21)—whenever these or any equivalent utterances are made, they mean that the name of the Lord Jehovah (who is Christ) has been placed upon his people, and they, knowing the name by which they are called, are heirs of salvation.

 

(Bruce R. McConkie, The Promised Messiah: The First Coming of Christ [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1978], 369.)

 

 

Verses 10-12 – Judah as the wife loves to wander after other men while married to Jehovah.  After she has her flings she comes back to her husband, she asks, what’s the problem?

 

The Lord tells Jeremiah not to pray any more for the benefit of this people, nothing will stop His hand in destroying this people, He won’t budge from His stance against them, and they are not accepted by Him.

 

Jeremiah is suffering right along with the people during the drought, his human side shows in verses 19-22, I just want a drink!

 

In chapter 15 the Lord answers his plea. Even if Moses stood before me I won’t change my mind. Where is the Lord’s mercy?  Yet the people refuse to repent, what else can the Lord do?

 

(Jeremiah 15:1-21.)

 

1 Then said the LORD unto me, Though Moses and Samuel stood before me, yet my mind could not be toward this people: cast them out of my sight, and let them go forth.

 

2 And it shall come to pass, if they say unto thee, Whither shall we go forth? then thou shalt tell them, Thus saith the LORD; Such as are for death, to death; and such as are for the sword, to the sword; and such as are for the famine, to the famine; and such as are for the captivity, to the captivity.

 

3 And I will appoint over them four kinds, saith the LORD: the sword to slay, and the dogs to tear, and the fowls of the heaven, and the beasts of the earth, to devour and destroy.

 

4 And I will cause them to be removed into all kingdoms of the earth, because of Manasseh the son of Hezekiah king of Judah, for that which he did in Jerusalem.

 

5 For who shall have pity upon thee, O Jerusalem? or who shall bemoan thee? or who shall go aside to ask how thou doest?

 

6 Thou hast forsaken me, saith the LORD, thou art gone backward: therefore will I stretch out my hand against thee, and destroy thee; I am weary with repenting.

 

7 And I will fan them with a fan in the gates of the land; I will bereave them of children, I will destroy my people, since they return not from their ways.

 

8 Their widows are increased to me above the sand of the seas: I have brought upon them against the mother of the young men a spoiler at noonday: I have caused him to fall upon it suddenly, and terrors upon the city.

 

9 She that hath borne seven languisheth: she hath given up the ghost; her sun is gone down while it was yet day: she hath been ashamed and confounded: and the residue of them will I deliver to the sword before their enemies, saith the LORD.

 

10 ¶ Woe is me, my mother, that thou hast borne me a man of strife and a man of contention to the whole earth! I have neither lent on usury, nor men have lent to me on usury; yet every one of them doth curse me.

 

11 The LORD said, Verily it shall be well with thy remnant; verily I will cause the enemy to entreat thee well in the time of evil and in the time of affliction.

 

12 Shall iron break the northern iron and the steel?

 

13 Thy substance and thy treasures will I give to the spoil without price, and that for all thy sins, even in all thy borders.

 

14 And I will make thee to pass with thine enemies into a land which thou knowest not: for a fire is kindled in mine anger, which shall burn upon you.

 

15 ¶ O LORD, thou knowest: remember me, and visit me, and revenge me of my persecutors; take me not away in thy longsuffering: know that for thy sake I have suffered rebuke.

 

16 Thy words were found, and I did eat them; and thy word was unto me the joy and rejoicing of mine heart: for I am called by thy name, O LORD God of hosts.

 

17 I sat not in the assembly of the mockers, nor rejoiced; I sat alone because of thy hand: for thou hast filled me with indignation.

 

18 Why is my pain perpetual, and my wound incurable, which refuseth to be healed? wilt thou be altogether unto me as a liar, and as waters that fail?

 

19 ¶ Therefore thus saith the LORD, If thou return, then will I bring thee again, and thou shalt stand before me: and if thou take forth the precious from the vile, thou shalt be as my mouth: let them return unto thee; but return not thou unto them.

 

20 And I will make thee unto this people a fenced brasen wall: and they shall fight against thee, but they shall not prevail against thee: for I am with thee to save thee and to deliver thee, saith the LORD.

 

21 And I will deliver thee out of the hand of the wicked, and I will redeem thee out of the hand of the terrible

 

 

 

Called by Thy Name (Jer. 15:10-21)

 

Jeremiah recounted his reception of the words of the Lord in much the same image as did Ezekiel (Ezek. 3:1-3) and John the Revelator (Rev. 10:9-10): an act of eating. "Thy words were found, and I did eat them; and thy word was unto me the joy and rejoicing of mine heart: for I am called by thy name, O Lord God of hosts" (Jer. 15:16). And yet the results were persecution, rebuke (Jer. 15:15), isolation, and loneliness: "I sat not in the assembly of the mockers, nor rejoiced; I sat alone because of thy hand: for thou hast filled me with indignation. Why is my pain perpetual, and my wound incurable, which refuseth to be healed? wilt thou be altogether unto me as a liar, and as waters that fail?" (Jer. 15:17-18).

 

The Lord responded sharply to the accusation, reminding Jeremiah of the privilege of his station and of his need to repent and be converted to his calling: "Therefore thus saith the Lord, If thou return, then will I bring thee again, and thou shalt stand before me: and if thou take forth the precious from the vile, thou shalt be as my mouth" (Jer. 15:19). Repeating the promise he gave to Jeremiah from the beginning at his call, the Lord reminded him of whom he was serving: "I will make thee unto this people a fenced brasen wall: and they shall fight against thee, but they shall not prevail against thee: for I am with thee to save thee and to deliver thee, saith the Lord" (Jer. 15:20). Indeed, without the help of the Lord such a calling would be unthinkable.

 

 

(Kent P. Jackson, ed., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 4: 1 Kings to Malachi [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1993], 231.)

 

Think about Elder Holland giving an apostolic blessing to us in this valley last year for rain.  Have we changed in our behavior?

 

 

(Jeremiah 16:9-17.)

 

9 For thus saith the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel; Behold, I will cause to cease out of this place in your eyes, and in your days, the voice of mirth, and the voice of gladness, the voice of the bridegroom, and the voice of the bride.

 

10 ¶ And it shall come to pass, when thou shalt shew this people all these words, and they shall say unto thee, Wherefore hath the LORD pronounced all this great evil against us? or what is our iniquity? or what is our sin that we have committed against the LORD our God?

 

11 Then shalt thou say unto them, Because your fathers have forsaken me, saith the LORD, and have walked after other gods, and have served them, and have worshipped them, and have forsaken me, and have not kept my law;

 

12 And ye have done worse than your fathers; for, behold, ye walk every one after the imagination of his evil heart, that they may not hearken unto me:

 

13 Therefore will I cast you out of this land into a land that ye know not, neither ye nor your fathers; and there shall ye serve other gods day and night; where I will not shew you favour.

 

14 ¶ Therefore, behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that it shall no more be said, The LORD liveth, that brought up the children of Israel out of the land of Egypt;

 

15 But, The LORD liveth, that brought up the children of Israel from the land of the north, and from all the lands whither he had driven them: and I will bring them again into their land that I gave unto their fathers.

 

16 ¶ Behold, I will send for many fishers, saith the LORD, and they shall fish them; and after will I send for many hunters, and they shall hunt them from every mountain, and from every hill, and out of the holes of the rocks.

 

17 For mine eyes are upon all their ways: they are not hid from my face, neither is their iniquity hid from mine eyes.

 

 

Verses 10-13 – the word imagination actually means stubbornness or rebellion, the people are not ignorant of what they are doing, they are worshipping other gods on purpose.  The Lord tells them they will be removed from this choice land and taken to a strange land where they can worship whatever they want, but they will no longer worship here in this land.

Verse 16 – the gathering of Israel, hunters and gatherers. 

 

The Gathering of Scattered Israel

Elder Russell M. Nelson
Of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles

We help to gather the elect of the Lord on both sides of the veil.

My beloved brothers and sisters, thank you for your faith, your devotion, and your love. We share an enormous responsibility to be who the Lord wants us to be and to do what He wants us to do. We are part of a great movement—the gathering of scattered Israel. I speak of this doctrine today because of its unique importance in God's eternal plan.

Abrahamic Covenant

Anciently, the Lord blessed Father Abraham with a promise to make his posterity a chosen people.1 References to this covenant occur throughout the scriptures. Included were promises that the Son of God would come through Abraham's lineage, that certain lands would be inherited, that nations and kindreds of the earth would be blessed through his seed, and more.2 While some aspects of that covenant have already been fulfilled, the Book of Mormon teaches that this Abrahamic covenant will be fulfilled only in these latter days!3 It also emphasizes that we are among the covenant people of the Lord.4 Ours is the privilege to participate personally in the fulfillment of these promises. What an exciting time to live!

Israel Became Scattered

As descendants of Abraham, the tribes of ancient Israel had access to priesthood authority and blessings of the gospel, but eventually the people rebelled. They killed the prophets and were punished by the Lord. Ten tribes were carried captive into Assyria. From there they became lost to the records of mankind. (Obviously, the ten tribes are not lost to the Lord.) Two remaining tribes continued a short time and then, because of their rebellion, were taken captive into Babylon.5 When they returned, they were favored of the Lord, but again they honored Him not. They rejected and vilified Him. A loving but grieving Father vowed, "I will scatter you among the heathen,"6 and that He did—into all nations.

Israel to Be Gathered

God's promise for the gathering of scattered Israel was equally emphatic.7 Isaiah, for example, foresaw that in the latter days the Lord would send "swift messengers" to these people who were so "scattered and peeled."8

This promise of the gathering, woven all through the fabric of the scriptures, will be fulfilled just as surely as were the prophecies of the scattering of Israel.9

The Church of Jesus Christ in the Meridian of Time and the Apostasy

Prior to His Crucifixion, the Lord Jesus Christ had established His Church. It included apostles, prophets, seventies, teachers, and so forth.10 And the Master sent His disciples into the world to preach His gospel.11

After a time the Church as established by the Lord fell into spiritual decay. His teachings were altered; His ordinances were changed. The Great Apostasy came as had been foretold by Paul, who knew that the Lord would not come again "except there come a falling away first."12

This Great Apostasy followed the pattern that had ended each previous dispensation. The very first was in the time of Adam. Then came dispensations of Enoch, Noah, Abraham, Moses, and others. Each prophet had a divine commission to teach of the divinity and the doctrine of the Lord Jesus Christ. In each age these teachings were meant to help the people. But their disobedience resulted in apostasy. Thus, all previous dispensations were limited in time and location. They were limited in time because each ended in apostasy. They were limited in location to a relatively small segment of planet earth.

The Restoration of All Things

Thus a complete restoration was required. God the Father and Jesus Christ called upon the Prophet Joseph Smith to be the prophet of this dispensation. All divine powers of previous dispensations were to be restored through him.13 This dispensation of the fulness of times would not be limited in time or in location. It would not end in apostasy, and it would fill the world.14

The Gathering of Israel—an Integral Part of the Restoration of All Things

As prophesied by Peter and Paul, all things were to be restored in this dispensation. Therefore, there must come, as part of that restoration, the long-awaited gathering of scattered Israel.15 It is a necessary prelude to the Second Coming of the Lord.16

This doctrine of the gathering is one of the important teachings of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The Lord has declared: "I give unto you a sign . . . that I shall gather in, from their long dispersion, my people, O house of Israel, and shall establish again among them my Zion."17 The coming forth of the Book of Mormon is a sign to the entire world that the Lord has commenced to gather Israel and fulfill covenants He made to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.18 We not only teach this doctrine, but we participate in it. We do so as we help to gather the elect of the Lord on both sides of the veil.

The Book of Mormon is central to this work. It declares the doctrine of the gathering.19 It causes people to learn about Jesus Christ, to believe His gospel, and to join His Church. In fact, if there were no Book of Mormon, the promised gathering of Israel would not occur.20

To us the honored name of Abraham is important. It is mentioned in more verses of scriptures of the Restoration than in all verses of the Bible.21 Abraham is linked to all members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.22 The Lord reaffirmed the Abrahamic covenant in our day through the Prophet Joseph Smith.23 In the temple we receive our ultimate blessings, as the seed of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.24

The Dispensation of the Fulness of Times

This dispensation of the fulness of times was foreseen by God as the time to gather, both in heaven and on earth. Peter knew that after a period of apostasy, a restoration would come. He, who had been with the Lord on the Mount of Transfiguration, declared:

"Repent ye therefore, and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out, when the times of refreshing shall come from the presence of the Lord; . . . 

"Whom the heaven must receive until the times of restitution of all things, which God hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets since the world began."25

In modern times the Apostles Peter, James, and John were sent by the Lord with "the keys of [His] kingdom, and a dispensation of the gospel for the last times; and for the fulness of times," in which He would "gather together in one all things, both which are in heaven, and which are on earth."26

In the year 1830 the Prophet Joseph Smith learned of a heavenly messenger named Elias, who possessed keys to bring to pass "the restoration of all things."27

Six years later the Kirtland Temple was dedicated. After the Lord accepted that holy house, heavenly messengers came with priesthood keys. Moses appeared28 "and committed . . . the keys of the gathering of Israel from the four parts of the earth, and the leading of the ten tribes from the land of the north.

"After this, Elias appeared, and committed the dispensation of the gospel of Abraham, saying that in us and our seed all generations after us should be blessed."29

Then Elijah the prophet came and proclaimed, "Behold, the time has fully come, which was spoken of by the mouth of Malachi— testifying that he [Elijah] should be sent, before the great and dreadful day of the Lord come—to turn the hearts of the fathers to the children, and the children to the fathers, lest the whole earth be smitten with a curse."30

These events occurred on April 3, 1836,31 and thus fulfilled Malachi's prophecy.32 Sacred keys of this dispensation were restored.33

Gathering of Souls on the Other Side of the Veil

Mercifully, the invitation to "come unto Christ"34 can also be extended to those who died without a knowledge of the gospel.35 Part of their preparation requires earthly efforts of others. We gather pedigree charts, create family group sheets, and do temple work vicariously to gather individuals unto the Lord and into their families.36

To Participate in the Gathering: A Commitment by Covenant

Here on earth, missionary work is crucial to the gathering of Israel. The gospel was to be taken first to the "lost sheep of the house of Israel."37 Consequently, servants of the Lord have gone forth proclaiming the Restoration. In many nations our missionaries have searched for those of scattered Israel; they have hunted for them "out of the holes of the rocks"; and they have fished for them as in ancient days.38

The choice to come unto Christ is not a matter of physical location; it is a matter of individual commitment. People can be "brought to the knowledge of the Lord"39 without leaving their homelands. True, in the early days of the Church, conversion often meant emigration as well. But now the gathering takes place in each nation. The Lord has decreed the establishment of Zion40 in each realm where He has given His Saints their birth and nationality. Scripture foretells that the people "shall be gathered home to the lands of their inheritance, and shall be established in all their lands of promise."41 "Every nation is the gathering place for its own people."42 The place of gathering for Brazilian Saints is in Brazil; the place of gathering for Nigerian Saints is in Nigeria; the place of gathering for Korean Saints is in Korea; and so forth. Zion is "the pure in heart."43 Zion is wherever righteous Saints are. Publications, communications, and congregations are now such that nearly all members have access to the doctrines, keys, ordinances, and blessings of the gospel, regardless of their location.

Spiritual security will always depend upon how one lives, not where one lives. Saints in every land have equal claim upon the blessings of the Lord.

This work of Almighty God is true. He lives. Jesus is the Christ. This is His Church, restored to accomplish its divine destiny, including the promised gathering of Israel. President Gordon B. Hinckley is God's prophet today. I so testify in the name of Jesus Christ, amen.


NOTES

1. See Genesis 12:1–2; D&C 132:29–32; Abraham 2:6–11.
2. See Genesis 26:1–4, 24, 28; 35:9–13; 48:3–4; John 8:33, 39; Acts 3:25; 1 Nephi 17:40; 2 Nephi 29:14; Jacob 5; Ether 13:7–8; D&C 52:2.
3. See, for example, 1 Nephi 15:12–18.
4. See 1 Nephi 14:14; 15:14; 2 Nephi 30:2; Mosiah 24:13; 3 Nephi 29:3; Mormon 8:15; D&C 133:26–34.
5. The tribe of Levi provided priests among the people and was not to be numbered as a tribe or to receive tribal inheritance. Two sons of Joseph, Manasseh and Ephraim, were given land inheritances. They were numbered among the tribes, in the stead of their father, Joseph. The number of twelve tribes was thus maintained.
6. Leviticus 26:33; see also Jeremiah 9:16.
7. See Genesis 22:16–18; 3 Nephi 20–22; Abraham 2:10–11.
8. Isaiah 18:2, 7.
9. See Leviticus 26:44; Deuteronomy 4:27–31; 28; 29; 30:2–5; Nehemiah 1:9; Isaiah 11:11–12; Jeremiah 31:7–8, 10–12; Ezekiel 37:21–22; Amos 9:14–15; Matthew 24:31; Jacob 6:2; see also Russell M. Nelson, "The Exodus Repeated," Liahona, Apr. 2002, 30–39; Ensign, July 1999, 6–13.
10. See Luke 10:1, 17; Ephesians 4:11; Articles of Faith 1:6.
11. See Matthew 28:19–20; Mark 16:15.
12. 2 Thessalonians 2:3. "Falling away" is translated from the Greek apostasia, meaning "apostasy."
13. See D&C 128:18; 132:45.
14. See Isaiah 27:6.
15. See 1 Nephi 15:18; see also Book of Mormon title page, paragraph 2.
16. See D&C 133:17.
17. 3 Nephi 21:1.
18. See Genesis 12:2–3; 26:3–4; 35:11–12; and chapter headings for 3 Nephi 21; 29.
19. Doctrines relating to the scattering and gathering of the house of Israel are among the earliest lessons taught in the Book of Mormon: "After the house of Israel should be scattered they should be gathered together again; . . . the natural branches of the olive-tree, or the remnants of the house of Israel, should be grafted in, or come to the knowledge of the true Messiah, their Lord and their Redeemer" (1 Nephi 10:14).
20. See Bruce R. McConkie, A New Witness for the Articles of Faith (1985), 554.
21. Abraham is mentioned in 506 verses of scripture: 216 are in the Bible; 290 are in the scriptures of the Restoration.
22. The covenant may also be received by adoption (see Matthew 3:9; Luke 3:8; Galatians 3:26–29; 4:5–7; Abraham 2:9–10).
23. See D&C 124:58; 132:31–32.
24. See D&C 84:33–40; 132:19; Abraham 2:11.
25. Acts 3:19, 21.
26. D&C 27:13. Paul also prophesied of our day "that in the dispensation of the fulness of times [the Lord] might gather together in one all things in Christ, both which are in heaven, and which are on earth" (Ephesians 1:10).
27. D&C 27:6.
28. It is appropriate that Moses, who first led God's children to the land of their inheritance, would be the one to commit the keys of the gathering of Israel to the restored Church. Moses had come to Peter, James, and John on the Mount of Transfiguration and there had bestowed upon them the same priesthood keys in their day. At the conference of the Church in April 1840, the Prophet Joseph Smith appointed Orson Hyde to go to Jerusalem and there dedicate the land for the return of the Jews and scattered Israel.44 On Sunday, October 24, 1841, Elder Hyde knelt on the Mount of Olives and dedicated that land for the gathering of the Jews and of Israel to their ancient inheritance.
29. D&C 110:11–12.
30. D&C 110:14–15.
31. Significant is the fact that Moses, Elias, and Elijah came on Easter Sunday, at the beginning of Passover.
32. See Malachi 4:5–6.
33. See D&C 110:16.
34. Jacob 1:7; Omni 1:26; Moroni 10:30, 32; D&C 20:59.
35. See D&C 137:6–8.
36. See 1 Corinthians 15:29; 1 Peter 4:6.
37. Matthew 10:6; 15:24.
38. See Jeremiah 16:16.
39. 3 Nephi 20:13.
40. See D&C 6:6; 11:6; 12:6; 14:6.
41. 2 Nephi 9:2.
42. Bruce R. McConkie, in Conference Report, Mexico City Mexico Area Conference 1972, 45.
43. D&C 97:21.
44. See 2 Nephi 9:2; 10:7–9; 25:16–17, 20; 3 Nephi 21:22–28; D&C 29:7–8.

Heal Me (Jer. 17:14-18)

 

"Heal me, O Lord, and I shall be healed; save me, and I shall be saved: for thou art my praise" (Jer. 17:14). When it is read in sequence with the previous lament, this passage reveals a more humble Jeremiah praying in faith for the continued protection and inspiration promised by the Lord. At the same time he prayed for divine justice — a double does: "Let them be confounded that persecute me, but let not me be confounded: let them be dismayed, but let not me be dismayed: bring upon them the day of evil, and destroy them with double destruction" (Jer. 17:18). To this plea there was no divine response.

 

Forgive Not Their Iniquity (Jer. 18:18-23)

 

In Jeremiah 18 we learn more about those who were persecuting Jeremiah. Their statement that in spite of what they did to him, "the law shall not perish from the priest, nor counsel from the wise, nor the word from the prophet" (18:18), reveals that they considered the official religion of the land to be in good hands. Jeremiah again pleaded for judgment against his enemies. He reminded the Lord that at one time he had acted as mediator for his people: "Remember that I stood before thee to speak good for them, and to turn away thy wrath from them" (Jer. 18:20). No longer would he plead for those who sought his life: "Yet, Lord, thou knowest all their counsel against me to slay me: forgive not their iniquity, neither blot out their sin from thy sight, but let them be overthrown before thee; deal thus with them in the time of thine anger" (Jer. 18:23). To this plea also came no divine response.

 

As a Burning Fire (Jer. 20:7-13)

 

In a lament recorded in Jeremiah 20, we learn of the unwilling human nature of the prophet in submitting himself to the will of the Lord in delivering an unpopular message. At the same time we find a marvelous image of a man of God who could not contain the word of the Lord in his heart: "O Lord, thou hast deceived me, and I was deceived: thou art stronger than I, and hast prevailed: I am in derision daily, every one mocketh me. For since I spake, I cried out, I cried violence and spoil; because the word of the Lord was made a reproach unto me, and a derision, daily. Then I said, I will not make mention of him, nor speak any more in his name. But his word was in mine heart as a burning fire shut up in my bones, and I was weary with forbearing, and I could not stay" (Jer. 20:7-9).

 

Jeremiah, perhaps comforted by his own admission of weakness, went on to reaffirm his faith and to praise the Lord, who is "with me as a mighty terrible one . . . that triest the righteous . . . [and] delivered the soul of the poor from the hand of evildoers" (Jer. 20:11-13).

 

 

(Kent P. Jackson, ed., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 4: 1 Kings to Malachi [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1993], 231.)

 

 

(Jeremiah 18:2-10.)

 

2 Arise, and go down to the potter's house, and there I will cause thee to hear my words.

 

3 Then I went down to the potter's house, and, behold, he wrought a work on the wheels.

 

4 And the vessel that he made of clay was marred in the hand of the potter: so he made it again another vessel, as seemed good to the potter to make it.

 

5 Then the word of the LORD came to me, saying,

 

6 O house of Israel, cannot I do with you as this potter? saith the LORD. Behold, as the clay is in the potter's hand, so are ye in mine hand, O house of Israel.

 

7 At what instant I shall speak concerning a nation, and concerning a kingdom, to pluck up, and to pull down, and to destroy it;

 

8 If that nation, against whom I have pronounced, turn from their evil, I will repent of the evil that I thought to do unto them.

 

9 And at what instant I shall speak concerning a nation, and concerning a kingdom, to build and to plant it;

 

10 If it do evil in my sight, that it obey not my voice, then I will repent of the good, wherewith I said I would benefit them.

 

 

Another object lesson one of the most famous – the trip by Jeremiah to the potter’s wheel, God is the potter and will make Israel into something beautiful ever though it is marred and imperfect.  As long as it’s wet he can mold it, once it hardens it is set, no longer manageable.

 

The Potter's Wheel (Jer. 18)

 

In another of the most well-known images in Jeremiah, the Lord commanded him to go to the house of a potter and watch him work. The image of the work of the potter as an act of creation is well known throughout the Bible. In the statement in Genesis 2:7, "the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground," the verb used is ysr, the same verb used to mean forming a pot. This same image of the Lord "forming" individuals is used elsewhere, as in Jeremiah's call "before I formed thee in the belly" (Jer. 1:5), and "shall the clay say to him that fashioneth it, What makest thou?" (Isa. 45:9; see also 44:21, 24), and as a reference to the Lord's "forming" his people Israel (Isa. 27:11; 43:1, 21).

 

As Jeremiah watched the potter, who was probably molding a pot on a potter's wheel, the pot "was marred in the hand of the potter: so he made it again another vessel, as seemed good to the potter to make it" (Jer. 18:4). The Lord explained: "O house of Israel, cannot I do with you as this potter? saith the Lord. Behold, as the clay is in the potter's hand, so are ye in mine hand, O house of Israel" (Jer. 18:6). The Lord reaffirmed his power to intervene in history with the same verbs known from Jeremiah's call — that he has the power to "pluck up, and to pull down, and to destroy" (Jer. 18:7). At this time there was still hope for repentance, and the Lord promised those who would repent and return that he would "build" and "plant" them (Jer. 18:8-9).

 

Apart from being a memorable image of the omnipotence of God, this image of the potter reinforces the covenantal relationship of the Lord with his people. He has the power to form them as individuals and as a nation and to then destroy them and start over again. In history, when the pot has become marred, the Lord has destroyed it and started over again. He has done this on several occasions throughout scriptural history, such as the Flood, the destruction of the Nephites, and the Apostasy and the Restoration. Once again, we have no account that this revelation was witnessed or experienced by any other than Jeremiah, suggesting that it may have been for his own spiritual understanding.

 

 

(Kent P. Jackson, ed., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 4: 1 Kings to Malachi [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1993], 225.)

 

An element of interest in Jeremiah's prophetic work is the manner in which he taught object lessons (see Teacher; Teacher Development). For instance, Jeremiah called attention to the impending fall of Jerusalem and captivity of her inhabitants by wearing the yoke of an ox (Jer. 27:2). He showed his faith in the eventual restoration of Israel to her homeland by buying a piece of land (32:1-15). He conveyed some of his messages with parables. In jer. 18:3Jeremiah 18:1-10, the Lord inspired him to ask his listeners to observe a potter who had to rework some "marred" clay. He noted that the potter represented the Lord and the marred clay the inhabitants of Jerusalem. So poignantly disturbing was this parable that some of Jeremiah's listeners began to plot against his life (18:18-23). In Jeremiah 24:1-10 he declared that the Lord showed him two baskets of figs, one good and one inedible. The good figs represented those taken captive whom the Lord would "acknowledge." The inedible figs, which the Lord would discard, or have "removed," represented king Zedekiah, his princes, and those Judeans who had fled to Egypt.

 

(Encyclopedia of Mormonism, 1-4 vols., edited by Daniel H. Ludlow (New York: Macmillan, 1992), 722.)

 

 

(Jeremiah 19:2-15.)

 

 Thus saith the LORD, Go and get a potter's earthen bottle, and take of the ancients of the people, and of the ancients of the priests;

 

2 And go forth unto the valley of the son of Hinnom, which is by the entry of the east gate, and proclaim there the words that I shall tell thee,

 

3 And say, Hear ye the word of the LORD, O kings of Judah, and inhabitants of Jerusalem; Thus saith the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel; Behold, I will bring evil upon this place, the which whosoever heareth, his ears shall tingle.

 

4 Because they have forsaken me, and have estranged this place, and have burned incense in it unto other gods, whom neither they nor their fathers have known, nor the kings of Judah, and have filled this place with the blood of innocents;

 

5 They have built also the high places of Baal, to burn their sons with fire for burnt offerings unto Baal, which I commanded not, nor spake it, neither came it into my mind:

 

6 Therefore, behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that this place shall no more be called Tophet, nor The valley of the son of Hinnom, but The valley of slaughter.

 

7 And I will make void the counsel of Judah and Jerusalem in this place; and I will cause them to fall by the sword before their enemies, and by the hands of them that seek their lives: and their carcases will I give to be meat for the fowls of the heaven, and for the beasts of the earth.

 

8 And I will make this city desolate, and an hissing; every one that passeth thereby shall be astonished and hiss because of all the plagues thereof.

 

9 And I will cause them to eat the flesh of their sons and the flesh of their daughters, and they shall eat every one the flesh of his friend in the siege and straitness, wherewith their enemies, and they that seek their lives, shall straiten them.

 

10 Then shalt thou break the bottle in the sight of the men that go with thee,

 

11 And shalt say unto them, Thus saith the LORD of hosts; Even so will I break this people and this city, as one breaketh a potter's vessel, that cannot be made whole again: and they shall bury them in Tophet, till there be no place to bury.

 

12 Thus will I do unto this place, saith the LORD, and to the inhabitants thereof, and even make this city as Tophet:

 

13 And the houses of Jerusalem, and the houses of the kings of Judah, shall be defiled as the place of Tophet, because of all the houses upon whose roofs they have burned incense unto all the host of heaven, and have poured out drink offerings unto other gods.

 

14 Then came Jeremiah from Tophet, whither the LORD had sent him to prophesy; and he stood in the court of the LORD's house; and said to all the people,

 

15 Thus saith the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel; Behold, I will bring upon this city and upon all her towns all the evil that I have pronounced against it, because they have hardened their necks, that they might not hear my words.

 

 

The Potter's Earthen Bottle (Jer. 19-20)

 

The third symbolic act is related to the imagery of the potter at his wheel, but the vessel destroyed is the finished product. Of these three incidents, this is the only one that was apparently done for the public; their reaction is most interesting. Jeremiah was instructed to take an earthen bottle and go with some of the elders and priests to the Hinnom Valley, just south of Jerusalem. There he proclaimed: "Hear ye the word of the Lord, O kings of Judah, and inhabitants of Jerusalem; Thus saith the Lord of hosts, the God of Israel; Behold, I will bring evil upon this place, the which whosoever heareth, his ears shall tingle" (Jer. 19:3). Jeremiah enumerated their acts of idolatry, many of which had become localized in the Hinnom Valley and Tophet. fn He then uttered the threats of the Lord of a great "slaughter" (Jer. 19:6), destruction by the sword, their carcasses to be carrion (Jer. 19:7), the city to become desolate (Jer. 19:8), and the besieged in the city forced to eat the flesh of their sons and daughters (Jer. 19:9). All this is reminiscent of the graphic prophecies in Deuteronomy 28 that were directed against the covenant people if they broke the covenant. Symbolic of this destruction, Jeremiah broke the earthen bottle and declared: "Thus saith the Lord of hosts; Even so will I break this people and this city, as one breaketh a potter's vessel, that cannot be made whole again" (Jer. 19:11). Unlike the clay on the potter's wheel (Jer. 18:1-6), the individuals represented by the finished vessel that was broken would not have a second chance but would be buried in Tophet until there was no more room.

 

This symbolic act was a public event, and the implications were immediately understood by those present. Jeremiah 20 recounts the persecution that Jeremiah endured for delivering the word of the Lord to those who found the truth offensive. Pashur, the chief governor in the house of the Lord — a temple official who undoubtedly had heard about the Temple Sermon — had Jeremiah beaten and put into stocks (Jer. 20:1-2). Jeremiah prophetically pronounced upon this man a new name, Magor-missabib ("Terror all around"), and prophesied that Pashur himself would witness the death of his friends and the capture of Jerusalem by the Babylonians and that he would go into exile where he would die with all of his friends "to whom thou hast prophesied lies" (Jer. 20:3-6). This is the last we hear of this particular official in Jeremiah, perhaps because he was one of those sent in the deportation of 597 B.C.

 

 

(Kent P. Jackson, ed., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 4: 1 Kings to Malachi [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1993], 226.)

 

 

19:1-15 Thus saith the Lord, Go and get a potter's earthen bottle, and take of the ancients of the people, and of the ancients of the priests; And go forth unto the valley of the son of Hinnom

 

The pottery jug is breakable, for it is no longer pliable clay. The valley of Hinnom was the place where idolatrous altars and images had long been established, and the worst of Israel's apostate practices were enacted there. It was also a place for dumping refuse, sometimes called Tophet (BD, "Hinnom, valley of"; "Gehenna"; "Topheth").

 

Jeremiah took with him certain elders to hear his condemnation of human sacrifice, a horror never to be resorted to, much less used in worship of the Lord (Jer. 19:5Jer. 19:1-7, Jer. 19:55a). The prophet made dire predictions of parallel horrors to develop under siege and broke the pottery jug as a sign that neither it nor the idolater could be reshaped, hence they would be broken and cast away. Grim predictions of starvation, death, and conflagration followed; and history shows that all those horrors came with the Babylonian invasion. Why did the Lord not prevent it? He could not do so and preserve principles of agency and law in His world. With their agency, the people had "hardened their necks, that they might not hear [his] words" (Jer. 19:8-15).

 

20:1-18 Then Pashur smote Jeremiah the prophet, and put him in the stocks that were in the high gate of Benjamin, which was by the house of the Lord

 

A senior officer at the temple was brazen enough to "smite" the prophet, confine him in a device that holds the body in a distorted position, and keep him there overnight in a public place—all because of his prophecies. Undaunted, Jeremiah renamed him "terror all around"; the name Pashur appears to have meant something like "prosperity all around"—quite the opposite of his new name (Jer. 20:3a). He prophesied Pashur would suffer terror with the exiles and die in Babylon; the royal house would fare no better (Jer. 20:4-6).

 

Jeremiah's integrity held throughout the rejection and physical abuse he suffered, but he was not happy in his lonely and stressful calling. He had been reluctant to undertake it but had been persuaded by the Lord to do so (Jer. 20:7a; cf. 1:17-19). He felt that he had aroused only reproach and derision, yet his convictions were so strong that he could not forbear preaching repentance. In response he heard plotting and "fear on every side" (the same words in Hebrew as the new name he gave Pashur); and people watched for a reason to take revenge on him (Jer. 20:8-10). On the other hand, he was confident that the Lord would defend him and avenge his suffering; therefore, he praised and thanked the Lord, even though he lamented at times as Job had (Jer. 20:11-18; cf. Job 3:3-4).

 

This masterpiece in the biblical prophetic literature displays pressures and afflictions experienced by a prophet.

 

 

(Ellis T. Rasmussen, A Latter-day Saint Commentary on the Old Testament [Salt Lake City: Deseret, 1993], 577.)

 

 

 

M E R I D I A N     M A G A Z I N E

Lesson 41
"I Have Made Thee This Day… an Iron Pillar"
Jeremiah 16; 23; 39; 31

By Philip Allred

Calling of a Prophet

The prophet Jeremiah provides us with a remarkable study in steadfastness in the Lord. From his premortal performance to his mortal ministry we are given an often painful portrait of what a prophet goes through to serve God in correcting his own people.

Called in his youth (Jer. 1:6), and somewhat reminiscent of Enoch, Moses, and at least two Josephs (Jacob’s son, and Joseph Smith), the young man was concerned that he lacked the verbal skills and social respect required for Israel to listen to him. The Lord’s response was simple. “Be not afraid of their faces: for I am with thee to deliver thee” (Jer. 1:8).

Then Jehovah bestowed upon the boy a blessing (Jer. 1:9) with the prophetic charge to “root out, and to pull down, and to destroy, and to throw down” that which is evil in Israel on one hand, and on the other hand he was to also “build and to plant” (Jer. 1:10). These opposing metaphors are sequentially correct. Israel was laboring in idol worship — “playing the harlot” (Jer. 1:20) and changing themselves into “[plants] of a strange vine” (Jer. 1:21). This wickedness must be repented of first, and then the true construction of a Christ-like soul can take place only after the soil of their souls has been appropriately prepared.

Jeremiah’s Background

LDS Scholars David Rolph and Jo Ann Seely have cogently collected the following background materials on this Old Testament prophet in their analysis of Jeremiah and Lehi—his Book of Mormon counterpart and contemporary.

  •  “Jeremiah was from the tribe of Levi through Aaron (see Jeremiah 1:1) and was descended from the priestly family of Abiathar. Abiathar, one of the two high priests that served under David, had supported the rebellion of David’s son Adonijah; consequently, Solomon exiled Abiathar to the little town of Anathoth, two and a half miles to the northeast of Jerusalem (see 1 Kings 2:26-27). Centuries later Jeremiah was born and lived in Anathoth but spent much of his ministry in Jerusalem” (“Lehi and Jeremiah: Prophets, Priests & Patriarchs,” Journal of Book of Mormon Studies, vol. 8 [no. 2], 1999, 27).
  • “Jeremiah’s life was a symbol of the justice of God and the impending destruction of Jerusalem. He was commanded not to marry and not to have children, lest they die grievous deaths (see Jeremiah 16:1-4), and he was commanded not to mourn for the people because the Lord had taken away his “lovingkindness and mercies” (Jeremiah 16:5-7). Neither was he allowed to participate in the house of feasting and joy because the day was upon Judah when gladness would cease (see Jeremiah 16:8-9).” (Ibid., 27).
  • “We do not know exactly the dates of the births of Jeremiah or Lehi, but it is very likely that they were born either during or immediately after the reign of the wicked king Manasseh (687-642 B.C.) and that they were very close to the same age. Jeremiah was called to be a prophet as a young man in 627 B.C. (see Jeremiah 1:6)…. Some scholars believe this date represents the birth of Jeremiah, who was called from the womb [Jeremiah 1:5] — in which case he would be almost 30 when the Book of Mormon opens, younger than Lehi” (Ibid., 27-28, 85).
  • “Jeremiah … lived [his] early years in the reign of King Josiah, known as one of the most righteous of Judah’s kings. He came to the throne at a young age and was instrumental in cleansing the temple and reestablishing the covenant…. As the Assyrian Empire was beginning to weaken, there were great hopes of nationalism, but Josiah was tragically killed at Megiddo in 609 B.C., after which two decades of tumult began.” (Ibid., 28). This culminated with the reign of Zedekiah, who had been placed on the throne by the Babylonians.
  • “Lehi and Jeremiah may have known each other, and it may well have been through the priesthood that they shared association. We may assume that those commissioned by the Lord to prophesy in Jerusalem were acquainted with each other…. It is possible that a group of legitimate prophets also existed in Jerusalem shortly before the exile. Joseph Smith taught that all of the prophets, presumably including Jeremiah, had the Melchizedek Priesthood [Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, 180-81]. Lehi and his family certainly had the Melchizedek Priesthood, as evidenced by Alma 13, which describes the Nephite priesthood as Melchizedek. It is likely that Lehi and Jeremiah were part of a Melchizedek Priesthood community in Jerusalem, and it is not unlikely that one even received his priesthood from the other” (Ibid., 28-29).

This excellent analysis provides helpful insights into the world of the Jews during Jeremiah’s tumultuous ministry. I am personally humbled as I study this 40-year mission of Jeremiah — he labored with such a wicked people, in such precarious times, and without the hope that captivity and exile could be avoided. Yet, he persevered and stayed the course the Lord laid out for him.

No wonder Lehi rejoiced, while still in Jerusalem, when he learned that the city would be destroyed by the Babylonians. While this seems inappropriate or insensitive at first, Lehi correctly recognizes the Lord’s mercy in preserving the righteous. After reading the declaration of destruction and captivity in the prophetic book delivered to him he declared “thou art merciful, [for] thou wilt not suffer those who come unto thee that they shall perish!” (1 Nephi 1:12-15). Meaning, that he knew God would preserve the righteous, even through the punishment of the wicked.

We, too, in these latter-day times rife with wars and rumors of wars, take comfort and know of the mercy of God. Nephi taught, “For the time soon cometh that the fulness of the wrath of God shall be poured out upon all the children of men; for he will not suffer that the wicked shall destroy the righteous. Wherefore, he will preserve the righteous by this power, even if it so be that the fulness of his wrath must come, and the righteous be preserved, even unto the destruction of their enemies by fire. Wherefore the righteous need not fear; for thus saith the prophet, they shall be saved, even if it so be as by fire” (1 Nephi 22:16-17).

Indifference to the Savior or failure to keep the commandments of God brings about insecurity, inner turmoil, and contention. These are the opposite of peace. Peace can come to an individual only by an unconditional surrender — surrender to him who is the Prince of peace, who has the power to confer peace.

One may live in beautiful and peaceful surroundings but, because of inner dissension and discord, be in a state of constant turmoil. On the other hand, one may be in the midst of utter destruction and the bloodshed of war and yet have the serenity of unspeakable peace.

If we look to man and the ways of the world, we will find turmoil and confusion. If we will but turn to God, we will find peace for the restless soul. This was made clear by the words of the Savior: "In the world ye shall have tribulation" (John 16:33); and in his bequest to the Twelve and to all mankind, he said, "Peace I leave with you, my peace I give unto you: not as the world giveth..." (John 14:27; Elder Howard W. Hunter, Conference Report, October 1966, 16).

Taking It Well

Jeremiah’s lament in Jeremiah 20 is certainly understandable (see vv. 14-18). As all prophets of the Lord are, he was subjected to all manner of indignities and injustices simply for telling the truth. Yet, his inspiring words ring down through the ages, resonating with those in whom the Spirit of God is kindled: “But his word was in mine heart as a burning fire shut up in my bones, and I was weary with forbearing, and I could not stay” (Jer. 20:9).

What makes such a man? Is it not the receipt of and resolution to be true to the revelations of the Almighty?

In this way the words of Ammon, the great Book of Mormon missionary who went through much affliction during his multi-year ministry among the Lamanites, are instructive. “For this is my life and my light, my joy and my salvation, and my redemption from everlasting wo” (Alma 26:36). He has received the witness of the Spirit that has revealed to him his eternal identity — to know he is God’s son and as such has a divine destiny with mortal missions germane to the same. To know this, then, is such sustaining power through all that natural men and fallen mortality can heap upon us.

Peter, who knew somewhat of suffering himself, reasoned, “For what glory is it, if, when ye be buffeted for your faults, ye shall take it patiently? But if, when ye do well, and suffer for it, ye take it patiently, this is acceptable with God. For even hereunto were ye called: because Christ also suffered for us, leaving us an example, that ye should follow his steps: Who did no sin, neither was guile found in his mouth: Who, when he was reviled, reviled not again; when he suffered, he threatened not; but committed himself to him that judgeth righteously” (1 Peter 2:20-23).

Jeremiah exhibited that rare kind of resignation that people who are at peace with God and all that their covenants might require feel. Like Abinadi, Jeremiah resigned himself into the hands of the people, saying, “As for me, behold, I am in your hand: do with me as seemeth good and meet unto you. But know ye for certain, that if ye put me to death, ye shall surely bring innocent blood upon yourselves, and upon this city, and upon the inhabitants thereof: for of a truth the Lord hath sent me unto you to speak all these words in your ears” (Jer. 26:14-15; see also Mosiah 17:9-10).

Modern Idolatry

In the final analysis we must see that this life and all that the world has to offer is at best temporary. In this way, Jeremiah’s fairly shocking attitude toward his own birth, including his wish that he had been killed from the womb (Jer. 20:14-18) can be seen as a hyperbole on the value we should place on our lives in this world. This is not to say that we should think less of the probationary purpose of mortality, of course; rather it is to see just how simple the proposition is here for us — will we be for God and his gospel and all that “the Lord seeth fit to inflict upon” us (Mosiah 3:19), or will we instead forsake him, “the fountain of living waters, and [hew ourselves] out cisterns, broken cisterns, that can hold no water”? (Jer. 2:13).

The Israelites of Jeremiah’s day were trying to find life’s satisfaction without the Lord’s guidance for how that satiation comes. Nephi, making plain the words of Isaiah’s prophecies and preachings to an earlier generation of Israel that were also facing imminent destruction, poetically wrote:

And all the nations [and individuals] that fight against Zion, and that distress her, shall be as a dream of a night vision; yea, it shall be unto them, even as unto a hungry man which dreameth, and behold he eateth [in his dream] but he awaketh and his soul is empty; or like unto a thirsty man which dreameth, and behold he drinketh but he awaketh and behold he is faith, and his soul hath appetite (2 Nephi 27:3; compare Isaiah. 29:7-8).

Samuel the Lamanite demystified this phenomenon by simply stating: “Ye have sought all the days of your lives for that which ye could not obtain; and ye have sought for happiness in doing iniquity, which thing is contrary to the nature of that righteousness which is in our great and Eternal Head” (Helaman 13:38). Elder Costa of the Seventy taught:

Many people in this world do not understand the difference between fun and happiness. Many try to find happiness having fun, but the two words have different meanings. I looked them up in the dictionary to find out what each of them meant. Fun is play, pleasure, gaiety, merriment, source of enjoyment, amusement, to behave playfully, playful, often a noisy activity, and teasing. Happiness is contentedness, joy, delight, and satisfaction.

I was taught, after becoming a member of the Church, that there is indeed a big difference between fun and happiness. I learned, even before my baptism, that the Lord has a plan of salvation for all His children (see 2 Nephi 2:29). Through this plan, depending upon what we accomplish here on earth, we shall return to our Heavenly Father's presence and live with Him forever in a state of eternal happiness.

All who seek full happiness can find it in the gospel of Jesus Christ, taught in His Church. Through Christ's doctrine, we are taught that we can be part of the great plan of happiness that He has prepared for all of us, His sons and daughters. As we keep His commandments, we are blessed and come to know true happiness (Elder Claudio R. M. Costa, “Fun and Happiness,” Oct. 2002 General Conference, Sunday Afternoon Session).

It has been said that idolatry in its most rudimentary form is simply the placing of anyone (or anything) above God in our worship, affections, and devotion (see Jer. 2:27). As the Master himself taught, “Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon earth, where moth and rust doth corrupt, and where thieves break through and steal: But lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven… For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also… No man can serve two maters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon. Therefore I say unto you, take no thought for your life” (Matt. 6:24-26; and also Matt. 6:19-20, 24-25).

President Kimball renewed Jeremiah and other Old Testament prophet’s charge against idolatry in his unforgettable talk “The False Gods We Worship.” His words are ever more relevant a quarter of a century later:

Sadly, however, we find that to be shown the way is not necessarily to walk in it, and many have not been able to continue in faith. These have submitted themselves in one degree or another to the enticings of Satan and his servants and joined with those of ‘the world’ in lives of ever-deepening idolatry.

I use the word idolatry intentionally. As I study ancient scripture, I am more and more convinced that there is significance in the fact that the commandment “Thou shalt have no other gods before me” is the first of the Ten Commandments.

Few men have ever knowingly and deliberately chosen to reject God and his blessings. Rather, we learn from the scriptures that because the exercise of faith has always appeared to be more difficult than relying on things more immediately at hand, carnal man has tended to transfer his trust in God to material things. Therefore, in all ages when men have fallen under the power of Satan and lost the faith, they have put in its place a hope in the “arm of flesh” and in “gods of silver, and gold, of brass, iron, wood, and stone, which see not, nor hear, nor know” (Dan 5:23) — that is, in idols.

This I find to be a dominant theme in the Old Testament. Whatever thing a man sets his heart and his trust in most is his god; and if his god doesn’t also happen to be the true and living God of Israel, that man is laboring in idolatry.”

And so it often seems to be with people, having such a firm grasp on things of the world — that which is telestial — that no amount of urging and no degree of emergency can persuade them to let go in favor of that which is celestial. Satan gets them in his grip easily. If we insist on spending all our time and resources building up for ourselves a worldly kingdom, that is exactly what we will inherit.”

In spite of our delight in defining ourselves as modern, and our tendency to think we possess a sophistication that no people in the past ever had — in spite of these things, we are, on the whole, an idolatrous people — a condition most repugnant to the Lord” (Pres. Spencer W. Kimball, “The False Gods We Worship,” Ensign, June 1976, 4-5).

 

 

History and Jeremiah's Crisis of Faith

 

S. Kent Brown

 

Before we begin our review of the parts of Jeremiah's early ministry, let us first set out the usual and customary picture of it. fn The prophet received his call while still a young man, during the thirteenth year of King Josiah's reign, about 627 or 626 B.C. In his early prophecies, he spoke of an unidentified peril which was to come upon Jerusalem and Judah from the north (see Jeremiah 1:13-16; 4:6; 6:1). Until about seventy years ago, fn virtually all scholars believed that this was a reference to the Scythian hordes which swept through Syria and Palestine on their way to and from Egypt, and of which only the Greek historian Herodotus had something to say. fn If indeed the Scythians were the peril envisioned by Jeremiah, then his predictions about Jerusalem's destruction by that foe remained unfulfilled. I wish to note here, parenthetically, that I do not personally believe that this unidentified evil at the time of the prophet's early ministry was the Scythian army. But more on this later. When this prophecy was not shortly fulfilled, Jeremiah lapsed into a period of silence. That the prophet was deeply troubled by the apparent nonfulfillment of his prophecies we learn from the so-called Confessions of Jeremiah (usually considered to be six in number: see Jeremiah 11:18-12:6; 15:10-21; 17:9-10, 14-18; 18:18-23; 20:7-12; 20:14-18). It is worth recalling, additionally, that 621 B.C. saw the discovery of the Book of the Law in the temple, upon which King Josiah based an extensive religious reform (2 Kings 22:8) fn To all appearances, Jeremiah enthusiastically supported this revision, which both initially did away with all of the small shrines, whether dedicated to YHWH or to other non-Israelite deities, and attempted to centralize sacrificial worship at Jerusalem. fn This reformation must have had a debilitating impact on the livelihood of Jeremiah's priestly family, who not only lived in Anathoth but also probably officiated at one of the local discontinued shrines, thus explaining in part their strong opposition to his ministry. fn When the strength and purpose of the reform began to wane, Jeremiah withdrew his endorsement. fn Then, when Jehoiakim came to the throne after Josiah's untimely death, the prophet once again took up his predictions concerning the peril from the north, this time applying them to the Chaldeans, who had newly arisen as an international power.

 

Every detail of this brief traditional outline of Jeremiah's early ministry has been challenged. fn For instance, concerning the relationship between the Scythian incursion and the prophet's despair—the major items which will hold our attention here—no less a scholar than Professor John Bright wrote in 1959 that Herodotus's assertion that "the Scythians ... ran wild over western Asia, ranging as far as the Egyptian frontier, is to be received with greatest caution; though some scholars accept it and explain the oracles of Zephaniah and young Jeremiah in light of it, it is quite without objective support." fn Bright here dismisses Herodotus's account without discussion. Bearing in mind the need to consider later the validity of Herodotus's witness, let us first turn to the problem of the identification of the foe from the north, the solution to which will have to take into account the Greek historian.

 

At the time of his call, Jeremiah saw two visions (see Jeremiah 1:11, 13), fn the second of which included a view of "a seething pot" boiling in the north. Its contents were to be poured out on Jerusalem and the land of Judah, for, as the Lord said: "Out of the north an evil shall break forth upon all the inhabitants of the land. For, lo, I will call all the families of the kingdoms of the north, saith the Lord; and they shall come, and they shall set every one his throne at the entering of the gates of Jerusalem, and against all the walls thereof round about, and against all the cities of Judah. And I will utter my judgments against them touching all their wickedness." (Jeremiah 1:14-16a.) This picture of widespread destruction and punishment from the north became a feature of Jeremiah's message from the opening of his ministry. fn Notably, in each reference to this peril (see Jeremiah 1:14ff.; 4:6; 6:1), just who was coming from the north remained unknown, apparently even to the prophet, for it was not until a much later date in his ministry that he identified this punishing force as the Chaldeans from Babylonia (see Jeremiah 21:4, 9; 22:25). We can observe thus far, then, that the Lord had apparently revealed to the youthful Jeremiah only the northerly route by which the peril would travel to Palestine, fn but not the foe who would come.

 

We noted earlier that something had occurred during the early years of the prophet's career which drove him to complain bitterly about unfulfilled prophecies. Among other things, the situation had resulted in Jeremiah's being totally and publicly discredited. In fact, even his family had joined in a plot to take his life, apparently because whatever had happened had created an enormous public outcry against him. What had occurred that caused the prophet to complain so and motivated his family and friends to seek his life? It does not seem possible that Jeremiah's open support of Josiah's religious reforms would have generated such a furor—even if those revisions eventually lost popular support, as some scholars maintain. fn After all, Josiah was still living at the time. fn We must seek a better explanation. And the only other possible and feasible solution is the Scythian hypothesis.

 

Herodotus says that the Scythians, after becoming masters of Asia, marched south intending to invade Egypt. fn En route they passed along the coastline of Syria and Palestine, a movement which surely was known to the inhabitants of Judah and would have spread alarm. Arriving at the border of Egypt, between the Philistine kingdom and the Delta region, the Scythians were met by Pharaoh Psammeticus and were bribed with gifts and persuaded not to invade the Nile Valley. The Scythians then retraced their steps, plundering at least the Philistine city of Ashkelon. Incidentally, this second sweep past the outlying communities of Judah would also have been known in Jerusalem. After returning to Asia, the Scythians were said to have ruled for twenty-eight years before their power waned.

 

Scholars have raised major objections against this narration by Herodotus. The first concerns its historicity. The protests range from outright denials of the incidents mentioned to an insistence that Herodotus's information is questionable. fn But no real foundation exists for rejecting his narrative out of hand. To be sure, Herodotus's major interest centered on the possible relation of Aphrodite to the goddess of Ashkelon, whose city was attacked. But Herodotus's interest in Aphrodite does not call the historicity of the entire incident into question. Neither is there any reason to suppose that the priests at Ashkelon made up the story merely to entertain inquisitive visitors to their city. fn Moreover, the fact that the Bible makes no specific mention of this incident, and that it was narrated by Herodotus alone, does not destroy his credibility in the least. fn On the contrary, his trustworthiness as a reliable source is buttressed by two pieces of evidence. The first is the existence of Jeremiah's confessions, written in the wake of a crisis which caused the prophet deep personal disappointment, coupled with the resulting public outcry against him. Clearly, some major external event had happened to bring about this circumstance. Admittedly, I am here engaging a bit in circular reasoning by saying, on the one hand, that if the Scythians came Jeremiah's situation can be explained and, on the other, that if the prophet's circumstance is to be rightly understood then we shall likely see the Scythian incursion lying behind it. For good or bad, this is often how one has to deal with historical connections which on the surface are not readily apparent. But there is more. The second piece of evidence stems from the existence of the name Scythopolis, a toponym associated with an ancient city which lay in the Jordan Valley a few miles south of the Sea of Galilee. The origin of this name has puzzled investigators. The town was originally called Bethshan, mentioned as early as Joshua 17:11 as belonging to the tribe of Manasseh. fn At a date prior to the second century B.C., this city acquired the name Scythopolis fn and was reckoned within the Decapolis district, which was made up of ten non-Jewish cities in the regions of Galilee and Gilead. fn Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain the genesis of the toponym Scythopolis, including Jerome's which suggested that the proximity of the biblical town Sukkoth (Genesis 33:17), whose consonants are s-k-t, had given Bethshan its new name. But the most natural explanation is that some of the Scythian band who had gone to the border of Egypt did not return with the main body to Asia. Instead, they turned aside when they came to Galilee and settled in the area near Bethshan. Eventually, in this view, it was these people who gave the town its name in the Greek period as a result of waning Israelite influences during and after the exile in Babylon. fn

 

The second major problem facing the Scythian hypothesis consists in dating their incursion. If they came at a time removed from Jeremiah's early ministry, the hypothesis does not hold. Let us state what is securely known. First of all, the Scythians came during the reign of Pharaoh Psammeticus (who died 610 B.C.). Secondly, the invasion occurred before the destruction of Nineveh by Cyaxares the Mede in 612 B.C. fn Further, Egypt went to the aid of the crumbling Assyrian empire in 616 B.C., fn the earliest terminus ante quem we can firmly establish. Scholars such as H. H. Rowley have suggested that the incursion likely occurred even before this, perhaps prior to 621 B.C., the beginning of Josiah's reform. fn Whether or not this idea holds, we can safely say—based simply on what can be demonstrated historically—that the crisis which precipitated Jeremiah's troubles fell before 616 B.C., within a decade of his call. Such a conclusion supports the observations of others that the renewal of Jeremiah's call, which appears at the end of his second confession in chapter 15, verses 20 and 21, must have followed a major setback early in his ministry rather than late. fn

 

Having now established the high probability, not only that Herodotus's record of the Scythian invasion is historically reliable, but also that this invasion came within the first years of Jeremiah's ministry, we turn to the confessions themselves. Taken together, fn the confessions clearly demonstrate both that the prophet was deeply disappointed because of unfulfilled prophecies and that, consequently, he felt God had abandoned him. In these solemn dirges one plainly sees that Jeremiah passed through a crisis which shook his faith in the Lord. Let us first discuss the confessions in order (see Jeremiah 11:18-12:6; 15:10-21; 17:9f., 14-18; 18:18-23; 20:7-12, 14-18), fn and then suggest a reconstruction of events which led to his difficulties.

 

The first passage brings chapter 11 to a close and opens chapter 12 (see Jeremiah 11:18-12:6). Jeremiah recorded here that the Lord had revealed to him a plot against his life hatched by "the men of Anathoth" (Jeremiah 11:21), his hometown (see Jeremiah 1:1). In this connection, Jeremiah noted that the instigators of the plot went so far as to speak in riddles when discussing his planned murder in his presence (see Jeremiah 11:19). His narrow escape from death seemingly led him to ask, "Wherefore doth the way of the wicked prosper? Wherefore are all they happy that deal very treacherously? Thou hast planted them, yea, they have taken root: they grow, yea, they bring forth fruit; thou art near in their mouth and far from their reins." (Jeremiah 12:If.) fn What the prophet said next forms and important key to understanding his own tortured frustrations and disappointments. "Thou, O Lord, knowest me: thou hast seen me, and tried mine heart toward thee" (Jeremiah 12:3). Note the theme of trial, a concept which we shall stress again. The prophet has here claimed for the first time that the Lord had "tried" his loyalty. He continued by pleading that the Lord avenge him against his enemies. Then the Lord gently reprimanded him (see Jeremiah 12:5f.): "If thou hast run with the footmen, and they have wearied thee, then how canst thou contend with horses? And if in the land of peace, wherein thou trustedst, they wearied thee, then how wilt thou do in the swelling of Jordan?" God's message to the prophet was plain—matters were only to become worse. The Lord went on to say, "For even thy brethren, and the house of thy father, even they have dealt treacherously with thee; yea, they have called a multitude after thee: believe them not, though they speak fair words unto thee" (Jeremiah 12:6). Whatever had happened, it is clear that it had turned not only the people in Jeremiah's hometown but even members of his own family against him. In fact, the anger had run so deeply among family memebers that they too had participated in the plot against his life.

 

The second of the six confessions occurs in chapter 15. The prophet began it by saying, "Woe is me, my mother, that thou hast borne me a man of strife and a man of contention to the whole earth!" (Jeremiah 15:10.) He then sorrowed that, although he had neither lent nor borrowed, everyone hated him. After he next quoted the Lord's words concerning the fate of himself and of a remnant of Judah to be spared destruction, fn Jeremiah continued:

 

O Lord, thou knowest: remember me, and visit me, and revenge me of my persecutors; take me not away in thy long-suffering: know that for thy sake I have suffered rebuke. (Jeremiah 15:15.)

 

It is absolutely clear both from this and from earlier passages that he had suffered severe persecution. And we know that some of it came from his family and old associates in Anathoth. Listen now to his following words as he reflected on his call:

 

Thy words were found, and I did eat them, thy word was unto me the joy and rejoicing of mine heart: for I am called by thy name, O Lord, God of hosts. (Jeremiah 15:16.)

 

One can imagine Jeremiah remembering the joy and happiness which came to him when he was first called to be a spokesman to God's people. But after mentioning that this event effectively set him apart from others (see Jeremiah 15:17), he wrote a gloomy confession of his frustrations since his call:

 

Why is my pain perpetual, and my wound incurable, which refuseth to be healed? Wilt thou be altogether unto me as a liar, and as waters that fail? (Jeremiah 15:18.)

 

Here, mentioning his injury which seemingly could not be healed, Jeremiah dared to refer to God as "failing waters." fn In a word, the prophet was distressed. What had gone wrong? Significantly, this outburst led the Lord generously to reconfirm Jeremiah's prophetic calling, almost—as we noted earlier—in the very words of his original commission (see Jeremiah 15:20-21; cf. 1:17-19).

 

In his third confession, appearing in chapter 17, Jeremiah again stated that the Lord had been trying him severely. He quoted the Lord as saying, "I the Lord search the heart, I try the reins, even to give every man according to his ways, and according to the fruit of his doings" (Jeremiah 17:10). But even though he had been severely tested, the prophet acknowledged that only the Lord finally could help him (see Jeremiah 17:14).

 

Verse 15 may hold a clue as to what had happened. We read: "Behold, they say unto me, where is the word of the Lord? Let it come now." Plainly, Jeremiah was being teased and ridiculed because what he had prophesied had not come about. Something had obviously gone amiss—at least in the view of his hearers—and he was being baited to say more and thus compound his apparent errors. In this connection, we observe that in his fourth confession (see Jeremiah 18:18-23) he noted how his persecutors devised ways to trap him in his words so that they might refute him and not feel obliged to listen seriously to his message. Again, it is worth while to point out the prophet's reference here to constant harassment and persecution.

 

Jeremiah's fifth confession (Jeremiah 20:7-12) contains what is perhaps his most poignant statement:

 

O Lord, thou hast deceived me, and I was deceived: thou art stronger than I, and hast prevailed: I am in derision daily, everyone mocketh me. (Jeremiah 20:7.)

 

He went on to say that his trust in the word of the Lord had fallen so low that he had decided to quit, fn not to "speak any more in his name, But his word was in my heart as a burning fire shut up in my bones, and I was weary with forbearing, and I could not stay" from uttering the words of the Lord. (Jeremiah 20:9.) The feeling that he was deceived finds close links with the theme of trial when, almost immediately afterward, he mentioned the "Lord of hosts, that triest the righteous" (Jeremiah 20:12). So intense had persecution of him become that Jeremiah, who once had prayed for his people, now demanded that the Lord take vengeance on those who treated him despitefully.

 

The last confession (Jeremiah 20:14-18) was written in the depths of despair. I know of only one other mournful passage in all of scripture that can match its majestic blackness and sorrow. fn Indeed, the prophet had been brought to the end of his strength and wit. His faith had run out. What made him feel that he had been deceived by God himself, that somehow the Lord had made sport of him and finally had abandoned him?

 

The answer, as I have suggested, is to be connected with the sudden appearance and then abrupt disappearance of the Scythians—tiny events when viewed against the massive events of the fall of the Assyrian Empire. But before I offer my final solution to the problem, I must briefly return to an issue discussed earlier in another context. It concerns the series of statements about an "evil from the north" (see Jeremiah 4:6), the instrument of God's wrath against the unrepentant kingdom of Judah. As we already noted the identity of this peril was not known to Jeremiah during the early years of his ministry. We should now further observe that Zephaniah, whose ministry preceded that of Jeremiah by a few years, also knew of a peril that was to come out of the north. fn Since Zephaniah did not name this foe in his writings, it is clear that Jeremiah could not have learned its identity from this source.

 

From our vantage point, we know the identity of that peril who the Lord said would come to destroy Jerusalem and its temple. It was, of course, the Babylonian army. Indeed, as we have seen, Jeremiah came to know in the latter part of his ministry that it was the Chaldeans who were the "evil [that] shall break forth upon all the inhabitants of the land" (Jeremiah 1:14; see 21:4, 9; 22:25). Let us bear this in mind as we review a series of events associated with the Assyrian Empire before and during Jeremiah's ministry.

 

In 721 B.C. Samaria, then the capital of the kingdom of Israel, fell to the Assyrians after a three-year siege led by Shalmeneser V (727-722 B.C.) and Sargon II (722-705 B.C.) (see 2 Kings 17:5 ff.). We mark in passing Sargon's claim that he deported a total of 27,290 people. fn By 664 B.C., just fifty-seven years after the fall of Samaria, Assyrian power and territory had reached their zenith. But this did not last long. In October 626 B.C., about the time of Jeremiah's call, the Babylonian prince Nabopolassar defeated the Assyrians at Babylon, thus leading a successful revolt. Ten years later, the situation had become so desperate for Assyria that Egypt, an old nemesis and tribute-paying state, went to their assistance. Two years later, in 614 B.C., the capital city of Asshur was taken by Cyaxares, commander of the Medes. In 612 B.C., Nineveh itself fell to him while he was leading an allied force consisting of Medes, Babylonians, and possibly Scythian horsemen. fn It was the Scythians who had earlier swept down from the southern marches of the present-day Soviet Union who draw our attention.

 

We now must review the events that, although seemingly insignificant on the larger Near Eastern stage, affected the early ministry of Jeremiah so deeply. From all we can learn, the Lord did not reveal the identity of the foe from the north either to Jeremiah, the young prophet from Anathoth, or to Zephaniah, who had prophesied of a similar peril. Bearing this in mind, we note that before Jeremiah had prophesied for a decade, regularly warning that such a foe would appear bringing death and destruction to the people of Judah, the Scythians had passed along the coast of Palestine. They were on their way to Egypt, looting and burning as they went. fn The natural response of everyone in Judah, apparently including the prophet, would have been to consider the appearance of the Scythians as the fulfillment of his prophecies. At that moment, then, when the Scythians came sweeping down the Mediterranean plain, word would have been quickly communicated to Jerusalem that an attack was imminent.

 

But the expected attack never came, The Scythians passed southward, doing no appreciable damage to Jewish settlements. Even on their return they made the city and temple of Ashkelon their main target, doing consequential damage to nothing else. Thus the Scythian threat came and went, and Jerusalem and the land of Judah remained untouched. What had appeared to be the impending fulfillment of Jeremiah's words simply evaporated. It was then that his credibility fell to an all-time low. Had not the threat vanished? Had not Jeremiah been proven a false prophet? In the resulting furor and embarrassment, the prophet grew inwardly puzzled, frustrated, and disappointed. For a time it must have appeared that the Lord had deceived him, and he became the laughingstock of everyone. It was at this point, I believe, that his family and friends sought to take away his life because he had brought upon them intolerable shame and embarrassment. The youth from Anathoth, who had seemingly succeeded in the highest possible way, had suddenly—to all appearances—proved to be false, both to his people and to his religion. To compound the public pain and humiliation of his family, he eventually continued his message of Judah's doom, at the Lord's behest, now, however, identifying the peril as the Chaldeans from Babylon.

 

It is to Jeremiah's everlasting credit that he remained faithful as he passed through an extraordinarily severe test of his trust in the Lord. But pass it he did. The most tragic of prophets, he emerged from this crucible of trial more deeply committed than ever. And he had to be so committed, for it was at least another thirty years before he saw the fulfillment of his woeful prophecies of destruction, the message which he had borne since the first of his career. Prophesying for more than four decades, he remained to the last of his ministry a lonely man speaking with a lonely voice in a sea of distrust, lack of faith, and sin. But in the end, God vindicated his servant's prophecies and thus his servant. This observation alone constitutes a message for our own day: God honors and supports his servants who are faithful.

 

Notes

 

Footnotes

 

1. A good summary of the range of problems concerning Jeremiah's early ministry is that by H. H. Rowley, "The Early Prophecies of Jeremiah in Their Setting," Bulletin of the John Rylands Library 45 (1962-63): 198-234 (reprinted in Rowley's Men of God [1963], pp. 133-68). I am indebted to this insightful synopsis for much of my own understanding of this critical period in the prophet's career.

 

2. Rowley, pp. 206f. F. Wilke was among the first to reject the Scythian hypothesis: see Alttestament-liche Studien, Rudolf Kittel zum 60. geburtstag dargebracht, Beitrage zur Wissenschaft vom Alten Testament, vol. 13 (Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs, 1913), pp. 222ff.

 

3. The Histories, I.104-6.

 

4. Almost without exception, scholars identify this Book of the Law as an early version of Deuteronomy. See Rowley's summarizing observation about this on pp. 226ff. A very extensive literature exists on this subject. Latter-day Saints, incidentally, should not be surprised at the assertion that Deuteronomy may have been known in varying versions, since, for example, what we read about Moses' end in Deuteronomy chapter 34 differs substantially from what must have been written on the brass plates, a notion based on the very different account of Moses' late in Alma 45:19.

 

5. This is the usual reading of Jeremiah chapter 11, which, being full of Deuteronomic terminology and phraseology, apparently illustrates that Jeremiah was here advocating support of Josiah's reform. See Rowley, pp. 226f. for bibliography.

 

6. The notion that Jeremiah was an Aaronite priest descended from the high priest Abiathar, who was exiled by Solomon to Anathoth (1 Kings 2:26f.) has been challenged. To be sure, the phrase "of the priests" (Jeremiah 1:1) is omitted by the Septuagint. But there is no textual evidence against these words among Hebrew manuscripts (see Rowley, pp. 200, 203-6). One is always faced with the question of how to explain the opposition of the prophet's family. One logical answer, of course, is that the (Deuteronomic) reform somehow threatened their livelihood as priests of a local shrine. One notes that the name Anathoth derives from Anath, the name of a Canaanite goddess, possibly indicating that the town in pre-Israelite times housed a shrine dedicated to her. It would not be unusual for the Israelite priests to have taken over such a holy place and merely used it for their own worship. See the article on "Anathoth" in The Interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible, vol. 1 (Nashville: Abingdon, 1962), p. 125b.

 

7. This is the usual interpretation. But see the cautioning remarks of John Bright, Jeremiah, The Anchor Bible (Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1966), pp. xci-xcvi, 88f.

 

8. Rowley, pp. 199-201.

 

9. John Bright, A History of Israel (Philadelphia: Westminster, 1959), p. 293.

 

10. Questions have been raised whether the two visions accompanied Jeremiah's call (see Jeremiah 1:4-10). In Jeremiah, pp. 7f., Bright finally does admit that if they were not integral parts of Jeremiah's call they were given to him soon afterwards.

 

11. If one could demonstrate that Jeremiah's second vision (see Jeremiah 1:13ff.) came at a date significantly later than 627 or 626 B.C., the year of his call, then the vision could not have been (mistakenly) applied to the Scythians and would have referred from the first only to the Chaldeans. But nothing internal or external to the text supports a late date for this vision. See Bright, Jeremiah, pp. 7f.

 

12. Whether Jeremiah had the Scythians in mind, as some scholars maintain, or whether the Lord originally had reference to the Chaldeans, the route into Palestine for either would necessarily have been from the north. Rowley, pp. 214f.

 

13. Rowley, pp. 232-34.

 

14. The issue rests on the dating of the confessions. While it is rather certain that they were not all written at the same time (Rowley, pp. 220f.), their general date of composition is crucial if we are to place the prophet's crisis during Josiah's reign (640-609 B.C.), especially since the confessions relate the public and familial outcry against him (see Jeremiah 11:19-21; 12:6; 18:18, .; 20:7f.; 10). One key is the second confession (see Jeremiah 15:10-21), which included a renewal of Jeremiah's call (vv. 20f.) in almost the same terms used in his initial summons by the Lord (cf. Jeremiah 1:18f.). As Rowley points out, the renewal "can most naturally be placed after his initial experience of failure," early in his ministry rather than late (p. 222). See John Bright, "A Prophet's Lament and Its Answer: Jeremiah 15:10-21," Interpretation 28 (1974):59-74.

 

15. Herodotus, The Histories, I.103-6.

 

16. See references in Rowley, pp. 208f.

 

17. Ibid., p. 209.

 

18. Ibid., pp. 211-12. A recently published review of the archaeological evidence which generally supports Herodotus's account is Edwin Yamauchi's "The Scythians: Invading Hordes from the Russian Steppes," Biblical Archaeologist 46 (Spring 1983):90-99. No less a scholar than T.R. Glover thought that Jeremiah had made clear reference to the Scythians in 6:22-23; see his Herodotus, Sather Classical Lectures (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1924), p. 95.

 

19. See also Judges 1:27; 1 Chronicles 7:29; and 1 Samuel 31:10, 12, where it is recorded that the bodies of Saul and Jonathan were hung on the wall of Bethshan by the Philistines. Josephus, in Antiquities of the Jews VI.xiv.8 [374] and elsewhere, has noted that Scythopolis was the former Bethshan.

 

20. The Septuagint reading of Judges 1:27 makes the identification between Bethshan and Scythopolis. Hence, the latter would have been well established by the time of the translation of the book of Judges from Hebrew to Greek (third century or earlier?). That the new toponym was widely held by the second century B.C. can be seen by its appearance in 1 Maccabees 5:52; 7:36; and 2 Maccabees 12:39.

 

21. William Smith, ed., Dictionary of Greek and Roman Geography, vol. 1 (London: John Murray, 1873; reprint ed., AMS Press [1966]), pp. 398f., 757; Pauly-Wissowa, Real-Encyclopadie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft, Zweite Reihe [R-Z], Dritter Halbband, columns 947f.

 

22. Rowley, pp. 210f.

 

23. Herodotus, The Histories, I.103, 106.

 

24. See references in Rowley, pp. 202, 211.

 

25. Ibid., p. 211, makes the attractive suggestion that the prophetess Hulda was consulted about the Book of the Law (2 Kings 22:14ff.) because the young Jeremiah had already been discredited by this time, 621 B.C.

 

26. See note 14 above.

 

27. See Rowley's brief commentary, pp. 220-23. Bright has much more to say in his Jeremiah.

 

28. Recent studies include those by W. V. Chambers, "The Confessions of Jeremiah: A Study in Prophetic Ambivalence" (Ph.D. dissertation, Vanderbilt University, 1972); Cheng-Chang Wang, "A Theology of Frustration—An Interpretation of Jeremiah's Confessions," South East Asia Journal of Theology, 15 (1974):36-42; and P. Welten, "Leiden und Leidenserfahrung im Buch Jeremia," Zeitschrift fur Theologie und Kirche 74 (1977):123-50.

 

29. One hears echoes, of course, of a similar prayer uttered by the modern-day Prophet Joseph Smith in Liberty Jail (D&C 121:1-6). Compare Habakkuk 1:2-4, 13.

 

30. See the recent article on Jeremiah's citation of the words of the Lord here by G. V. Smith, "The Use of Quotations in Jeremiah XV 11-14," Vetus Testamentum 29 (1979):229-31.

 

31. Bright, Jeremiah, p. 110: "Literally 'a deceitful (brook),' a stream that goes dry in summer and cannot be depended upon for water. Remember that Jeremiah had once (see Jeremiah 2:13) called Yahweh 'the fountain of living waters'!"

 

32. The prophet's decision to remain silent has usually been associated with his disappointment in the reforms of Josiah (see Rowley, p. 200). But Jeremiah's words in chapter 20, verse 7, seem to point to a frustration growing out of something deeper. Consequently, I believe that his period of silence had to do with the seeming nonfulfillment of his prophecies, not with his disappointment in the reform movement. A treatment of all of chapter 20 appears in D. J. A. Clines, "Form, Occasion and Redaction in Jeremiah 20," Zeitschrift fur die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 88 (1976):390-409.

 

33. I refer to Job's lament (Job chapter 3).

 

34. Zephaniah 1:10 mentions a series of landmarks on the north side of Jerusalem past which the invaders were to come.

 

35. D. Winton Thomas, ed., Documents from Old Testament Times (reprinted; New York: Harper, 1961), pp. 58-63. A fuller range of texts appears in James B. Pritchard, ed., Ancient Near Eastern Texts, 3d ed. with Supplement (Princeton: University Press, 1969), pp. 284-87.

 

36. See, for instance, A. Leo Oppenheim, Ancient Mesopotamia: Portrait of a Dead Civilization (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964), pp. 161-63, 168-70; and Bright, A History of Israel, pp. 288-302.

 

37. It is Herodotus who mentioned the Scythian wont to plunder (The Histories, I.106).

 

 

(Monte S. Nyman, ed., Isaiah and the Prophets: Inspired Voices from the Old Testament [Provo: BYU Religious Studies Center, 1984], 105.)

 

 

Jeremiah 21-25

 

October 12, 2006

 

 

Josiah 640 -609 BC – A declining Assyria was the power in the area, but Babylon was again on the rise.  He wants to get rid of an alliance that Manasseh made with Assyria.  He was killed in the ensuing battle; Jeremiah laments greatly the loss of this righteous king.

Neo-Babylonian Empire (Chaldean Era) – Wikpedia Encyclopedia

Through the centuries of Assyrian domination, Babylonia enjoyed a prominent status, or revolting at the slightest indication that it did not. However, the Assyrians always managed to restore Babylonian loyalty, whether through granting of increased privileges, or militarily. That finally changed in 627 BC with the death of the last strong Assyrian ruler, Ashurbanipal, and Babylonia rebelled under Nabopolassar the Chaldean the following year. With help from the Medes, Nineveh was sacked in 612, and the seat of empire was again transferred to Babylonia.

Nabopolassar was followed by his son Nebuchadnezzar II, whose reign of 43 years made Babylon once more the mistress of the civilized world. Only a small fragment of his annals has been discovered, relating to his invasion of Egypt in 567 BC, and referring to "Phut of the Ionians".

Of the reign of the last Babylonian king, Nabonidus (Nabu-na'id), and the conquest of Babylonia by Cyrus, there is a fair amount of information available. This is chiefly derived from a chronological tablet containing the annals of Nabonidus, supplemented by another inscription of Nabonidus where he recounts his restoration of the temple of the Moon-god at Harran; as well as by a proclamation of Cyrus issued shortly after his formal recognition as king of Babylonia. It was in the sixth year of Nabonidus (549 BC) that Cyrus, the Achaemenid Persian "king of Anshan" in Elam, revolted against his suzerain Astyages, "king of the Manda" or Medes, at Ecbatana. Astyages' army betrayed him to his enemy, and Cyrus established himself at Ecbatana, thus putting an end to the empire of the Medes. Three years later Cyrus had become king of all Persia, and was engaged in a campaign in the north of Mesopotamia. Meanwhile, Nabonidus had established a camp in the desert, near the southern frontier of his kingdom, leaving his son Belshazzar (Belsharutsur) in command of the army.

In 539 BC Cyrus invaded Babylonia. A battle was fought at Opis in the month of June, where the Babylonians were defeated; and immediately afterwards Sippara surrendered to the invader. Nabonidus fled to Babylon, where he was pursued by Gobryas, the governor of Kurdistan, and on the 16th of Tammuz, two days after the capture of Sippara, "the soldiers of Cyrus entered Babylon without fighting." Nabonidus was dragged from his hiding-place, and Kurdish guards were placed at the gates of the great temple of Bel, where the services continued without interruption. Cyrus did not arrive until the 3rd of Marchesvan (October), Gobryas having acted for him in his absence. Gobryas was now made governor of the province of Babylon, and a few days afterwards the son of Nabonidus died. A public mourning followed, lasting six days, and Cambyses accompanied the corpse to the tomb.

Cyrus now claimed to be the legitimate successor of the ancient Babylonian kings and the avenger of Bel-Marduk, who was assumed to be wrathful at the impiety of Nabonidus in removing the images of the local gods from their ancestral shrines, to his capital Babylon. Nabonidus, in fact, had excited a strong feeling against himself by attempting to centralize the religion of Babylonia in the temple of Merodach (Marduk) at Babylon, and while he had thus alienated the local priesthoods, the military party despised him on account of his antiquarian tastes. He seems to have left the defense of his kingdom to others, occupying himself with the more congenial work of excavating the foundation records of the temples and determining the dates of their builders.

The invasion of Babylonia by Cyrus was doubtless facilitated by the existence of a disaffected party in the state, as well as by the presence of foreign exiles like the Jews, who had been planted in the midst of the country. One of the first acts of Cyrus accordingly was to allow these exiles to return to their own homes, carrying with them the images of their gods and their sacred vessels. The permission to do so was embodied in a proclamation, whereby the conqueror endeavored to justify his claim to the Babylonian throne. The feeling was still strong that none had a right to rule over western Asia until he had been consecrated to the office by Bel and his priests; and accordingly, Cyrus henceforth assumed the imperial title of "King of Babylon."

A year before Cyrus' death, in 529 BC, he elevated his son Cambyses II in the government, making him king of Babylon, while he reserved for himself the fuller title of "king of the (other) provinces" of the empire. It was only when Darius Hystaspis acquired the Persian throne and ruled it as a representative of the Zoroastrian religion, that the old tradition was broken and the claim of Babylon to confer legitimacy on the rulers of western Asia ceased to be acknowledged. Darius, in fact, entered Babylon as a conqueror.

After the murder of Darius, it briefly recovered its independence under Nidinta-Bel, who took the name of Nebuchadnezzar III, and reigned from October 521 BC to August 520 BC, when the Persians took it by storm. A few years later, probably 514 BC, Babylon again revolted under Arakha; on this occasion, after its capture by the Persians, the walls were partly destroyed. E-Saggila, the great temple of Bel, however, still continued to be kept in repair and to be a center of Babylonian patriotism, until at last the foundation of Seleucia diverted the population to the new capital of Babylonia and the ruins of the old city became a quarry for the builders of the new seat of government.

The death of King Josiah and the chronology of Kings after him up to the destruction of the Kingdom of Judah

 

Incidentally, I misinformed you last time when I said that it was Necho who installed Zedekiah. Necho installed Zedekiah's predecessor. Let me give you the lineup here. We will begin with Hezekiah because the Book of Mormon is full of Isaiah, and Isaiah is the great preacher. In the Dead Sea Scrolls Isaiah hopelessly swamps all the others as far as statistics are concerned. So we will begin with Isaiah and King Hezekiah because that's where the story of the Book of Mormon begins. That was way back in the eighth century (720 B.C.) when the Assyrians descended on Jerusalem. King Hezekiah was a contemporary of Isaiah, and Hezekiah's son was Manasseh (that's a good Book of Mormon name), and Manasseh's son was Amon (another good Book of Mormon name), and his son was Josiah (the great reformer). Josiah drove the Assyrians out of Israel, but at the famous Battle of Megiddo in 609 Josiah was beaten and killed by Necho II of Egypt. They wanted to get rid of Assyria. Once they had gotten rid of Assyria, Necho took over. Four years later Necho, being victorious in Palestine, tried to stop Nebuchadnezzar in 605 B.C. at the Battle of Carchemish (up in the North, not far away), and he was killed. Necho II had overcome Josiah, but he put Josiah's son Eliakim in as king of Judah and changed his name to Jehoiakim (2 Kgs. 23 -24). He also deposed his brother Jehoahaz. This is the trick: you put your own man in and give him a new name. As I said, Necho was beaten by Nebuchadnezzar. Then Nebuchadnezzar came in and deposed Jehoiakim, the one who had been put in by the king of Egypt. He put in his place Mathonihah who was Zedekiah. He was installed by Nebuchadnezzar, not Necho of Egypt (his brother was). Then the king changed his name to Zedekiah.

 

This is typical of the story: Zedekiah very soon rebelled against the Babylonians. He rebelled against Nebuchadnezzar who had installed him on the throne (who trusts whom in these days?). That brought the Babylonians in, and Nebuchadnezzar came and destroyed Jerusalem. That brought him into Jerusalem in Lehi's time because Zedekiah had turned against him. In the first year of Zedekiah is when Lehi had to leave Jerusalem. This is quite a while before because in 587 Jerusalem was destroyed. So this mix-up here is typical of what is going on.

 

 

(Hugh Nibley, Teachings of the Book of Mormon--Semester 1: Transcripts of Lectures Presented to an Honors Book of Mormon Class at Brigham Young University, 1988--1990 [Provo: Foundation for Ancient Re 46.)

 

 

Events in Judah Immediately Before 600 B.C.

 

For more than a century the southern kingdom continued a troubled and uncertain existence. Then in the year 608 B.C.—which marks the era immediately preceding the opening of the Book of Mormon—Judah faced its crucial hour. Necho, Pharaoh of Egypt, had dispatched an army against Assyria, and the path of the Egyptian advance lay through Palestine. Josiah, king of Judah, resolved to resist the approaching army and went out to meet it at the head of a plucky little Judean force. In the battle that followed, the Hebrews were beaten and King Josiah was slain. The Jews then chose one of Josiah's sons, Jehoahaz, for their king; but after a three-month term of office the Egyptians replaced him with another of Josiah's sons, whose name was Jehoiakim. For three years the Pharaoh of Egypt exercised political control of the kingdom of Judah through the puppet Jehoiakim. Then in the memorable year 605 B. C. the Babylonians marshalled a mighty army and crushed the Pharaoh's cohorts in the battle of Carchemish and, in so doing, took the Jewish nation out of Egypt's grasp. (The biblical account of this era is found in 2 Kings, chaps. 23-25; 2 Chronicles, chap. 36; Jeremiah, chaps, 26-39.)

 

But the Jewish people did not gain their freedom. Instead of Egyptian foreigners ruling their country, Babylonian foreigners took their place. Southern Palestine became a Babylonian vassal state. Unfortunately for all concerned, they allowed the quisling Jehoiakim, Jewish appointee of Egypt, to retain his throne. Before long the new monarch and his subjects were in revolt. In response, King Nebuchadnezzar moved an army to Jerusalem and laid siege against the rebellious city. About this time Jehoiakim either died or was taken captive by the enemy, for Jehoiachin, his son, is spoken of in the biblical account as surrendering to the Babylonians.

 

The Period at the Time of the Departure of Lehi from Jerusalem

 

These struggles between Assyria, Babylonia, and Egypt took place before the Book of Mormon record opens but during the lifetime of its early leading characters. When the account commences, twenty-one-year-old Zedekiah, the well-meaning but utterly weak uncle of the ill-fated King Jehoiachin, is spoken of as being in the first year of his reign. According to the book of 2 Kings, he was appointed to the throne by Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon. It was a time of great wickedness. Immorality and corruption were rampant. Dishonesty, false swearing, and idolatry were common vices of the day. As if the sins of the people were not already enough to invite God's judgments, Zedekiah chose to follow the disastrous course of Jehoiakim in seeking an alliance with Egypt and scheming a break from Babylonia. It was at this point that the prophet Jeremiah, whose gloomy prophecies had already brought him notoriety in Jehoiakim's day, thundered forth anew the ominous pronouncement that Jerusalem and its temple were doomed for destruction and the entire nation would be led into captivity if they did not repent and heed the admonitions of the Lord. But the declaration that God would turn against his chosen people and allow his sacred temple and his holy city to be destroyed was considered an outrage. To the incensed priests and princes the prophecy was traitorous and bordered on blasphemy. Jeremiah's arrest and imprisonment were ordered.

 

 

(Daniel H. Ludlow, A Companion to Your Study of the Book of Mormon [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1976], 61.)

 

Jeremiah 7-20 – the time of Jehoiakim, chapters 36-39 are the historical chapters of Jeremiah.

 

 

(Jeremiah 36:1-32.)

 

1 And it came to pass in the fourth year of Jehoiakim the son of Josiah king of Judah, that this word came unto Jeremiah from the LORD, saying,

 

2 Take thee a roll of a book, and write therein all the words that I have spoken unto thee against Israel, and against Judah, and against all the nations, from the day I spake unto thee, from the days of Josiah, even unto this day.

 

3 It may be that the house of Judah will hear all the evil which I purpose to do unto them; that they may return every man from his evil way; that I may forgive their iniquity and their sin.

 

4 Then Jeremiah called Baruch the son of Neriah: and Baruch wrote from the mouth of Jeremiah all the words of the LORD, which he had spoken unto him, upon a roll of a book.

 

5 And Jeremiah commanded Baruch, saying, I am shut up; I cannot go into the house of the LORD:

 

6 Therefore go thou, and read in the roll, which thou hast written from my mouth, the words of the LORD in the ears of the people in the LORD's house upon the fasting day: and also thou shalt read them in the ears of all Judah that come out of their cities.

 

7 It may be they will present their supplication before the LORD, and will return every one from his evil way: for great is the anger and the fury that the LORD hath pronounced against this people.

 

8 And Baruch the son of Neriah did according to all that Jeremiah the prophet commanded him, reading in the book the words of the LORD in the LORD's house.

 

9 And it came to pass in the fifth year of Jehoiakim the son of Josiah king of Judah, in the ninth month, that they proclaimed a fast before the LORD to all the people in Jerusalem, and to all the people that came from the cities of Judah unto Jerusalem.

 

10 Then read Baruch in the book the words of Jeremiah in the house of the LORD, in the chamber of Gemariah the son of Shaphan the scribe, in the higher court, at the entry of the new gate of the LORD's house, in the ears of all the people.

 

11 ¶ When Michaiah the son of Gemariah, the son of Shaphan, had heard out of the book all the words of the LORD,

 

12 Then he went down into the king's house, into the scribe's chamber: and, lo, all the princes sat there, even Elishama the scribe, and Delaiah the son of Shemaiah, and Elnathan the son of Achbor, and Gemariah the son of Shaphan, and Zedekiah the son of Hananiah, and all the princes.

 

13 Then Michaiah declared unto them all the words that he had heard, when Baruch read the book in the ears of the people.

 

14 Therefore all the princes sent Jehudi the son of Nethaniah, the son of Shelemiah, the son of Cushi, unto Baruch, saying, Take in thine hand the roll wherein thou hast read in the ears of the people, and come. So Baruch the son of Neriah took the roll in his hand, and came unto them.

 

15 And they said unto him, Sit down now, and read it in our ears. So Baruch read it in their ears.

 

16 Now it came to pass, when they had heard all the words, they were afraid both one and other, and said unto Baruch, We will surely tell the king of all these words.

 

17 And they asked Baruch, saying, Tell us now, How didst thou write all these words at his mouth?

 

18 Then Baruch answered them, He pronounced all these words unto me with his mouth, and I wrote them with ink in the book.

 

19 Then said the princes unto Baruch, Go, hide thee, thou and Jeremiah; and let no man know where ye be.

 

20 ¶ And they went in to the king into the court, but they laid up the roll in the chamber of Elishama the scribe, and told all the words in the ears of the king.

 

21 So the king sent Jehudi to fetch the roll: and he took it out of Elishama the scribe's chamber. And Jehudi read it in the ears of the king, and in the ears of all the princes which stood beside the king.

 

22 Now the king sat in the winterhouse in the ninth month: and there was a fire on the hearth burning before him.

 

23 And it came to pass, that when Jehudi had read three or four leaves, he cut it with the penknife, and cast it into the fire that was on the hearth, until all the roll was consumed in the fire that was on the hearth.

 

24 Yet they were not afraid, nor rent their garments, neither the king, nor any of his servants that heard all these words.

 

25 Nevertheless Elnathan and Delaiah and Gemariah had made intercession to the king that he would not burn the roll: but he would not hear them.

 

26 But the king commanded Jerahmeel the son of Hammelech, and Seraiah the son of Azriel, and Shelemiah the son of Abdeel, to take Baruch the scribe and Jeremiah the prophet: but the LORD hid them.

 

27 ¶ Then the word of the LORD came to Jeremiah, after that the king had burned the roll, and the words which Baruch wrote at the mouth of Jeremiah, saying,

 

28 Take thee again another roll, and write in it all the former words that were in the first roll, which Jehoiakim the king of Judah hath burned.

 

29 And thou shalt say to Jehoiakim king of Judah, Thus saith the LORD; Thou hast burned this roll, saying, Why hast thou written therein, saying, The king of Babylon shall certainly come and destroy this land, and shall cause to cease from thence man and beast?

 

30 Therefore thus saith the LORD of Jehoiakim king of Judah; He shall have none to sit upon the throne of David: and his dead body shall be cast out in the day to the heat, and in the night to the frost.

 

31 And I will punish him and his seed and his servants for their iniquity; and I will bring upon them, and upon the inhabitants of Jerusalem, and upon the men of Judah, all the evil that I have pronounced against them; but they hearkened not.

 

32 ¶ Then took Jeremiah another roll, and gave it to Baruch the scribe, the son of Neriah; who wrote therein from the mouth of Jeremiah all the words of the book which Jehoiakim king of Judah had burned in the fire: and there were added besides unto them many like words.

 

We are fasting but Jehovah isn’t seeing it.  Their approach to fasting was an outward show, the intent was missing, and fasting without the Spirit is just going hungry!

 

Verse 5 – He isn’t allowed to go to the temple even though he was a priest, the people didn’t like what Jehovah had to say.  Baruch got the assignment to read prophesies of Jeremiah to the people on this fast day at the temple.

 

Verse 6 – The day is Yom Kippur (Day of Atonement), the High Priest goes into the Holy of Holies to atone for the sins of the people.  The people are to afflict themselves; they are fasting but aren’t receiving what they want, so they complain!

 

The Day of Atonement

 

The concept of substitution or vicarious ordinances is perhaps best seen in Israel's annual commemoration of the Day of Atonement. In the fall of each year on the tenth day of the seventh month, Israel observed its Sabbath of Sabbaths, its most holy day, one which signified that the sins of Israel had been atoned for and that the nation and its people were restored to a state of fellowship with God. It was a day replete with types and shadows, a day of cleansing and a day of renewal. It was upon this day, and this day alone, that Israel's high priest entered the Holy of Holies, where he made atonement for the sins of the people.

 

Upon this day the high priest, he who held the office and position once given to Aaron, was to preside. He alone could stand as mediator for the people. Both a cleansing and a sacrificial ritual preceded his entrance into the Holy of Holies. He was first required to cleanse himself, then to clothe entirely in white linen garments (this in distinction to the golden garments which he otherwise wore). On this day he was to make a sin offering (a young bullock) and a burnt offering (a ram) for himself and his own family. These were to be purchased with his own money. From the public treasury he was to purchase two young goats for a sin offering, and a ram for a burnt offering. These he sacrificed in behalf of the people. By lot one of the goats was to be designated as the goat of the Lord, the name Jehovah being placed upon him. (McConkie, Bruce R. The Promised Messiah. Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1978., p. 436.) The other goat was to carry the name Azazel, the root of which means "wholly to put aside," or "wholly to go away" (Edersheim, Alfred. The Temple: Its Ministry and Services as They Were at the Time of Christ. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1982., p. 324). This was the scapegoat. The goat of the Lord was to be offered as the sin offering. When the high priest entered the Holy of Holies he would take the blood of this goat and sprinkle it on the lid of the Ark of the Covenant. Later he would lay his hands on the head of the live goat and confess all the sins and iniquities of his people. This goat was then led off into the wilderness. (See Leviticus 16.)

 

In his epistle to the Hebrews, Paul shows how the law of Moses and particularly the ritual associated with the Day of Atonement was an outward ordinance or type that was fulfilled in Christ. He described the tabernacle as "a worldly sanctuary" where the sacrificial ordinances performed on the Day of Atonement prefigured the atoning sacrifice of Christ. These ordinances were to remain "until the time of reformation," when Christ should come as a high priest of "a greater and more perfect tabernacle," to prepare himself and all men, by the shedding of his own blood, to obtain "eternal redemption for us." Paul described the Mosaic covenant as a "shadow of good things to come, for it is not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins But this man, after he had offered one sacrifice for sins for ever, sat down on the right hand of God." (Hebrews 9 and 10.)

 

"Knowing, as we do, that sins are remitted in the waters of baptism; that baptisms were the order of the day in Israel; and that provision must be made for repentant persons to free themselves from sins committed after baptism—we see in the annual performances of the Day of Atonement one of the Lord's provisions for renewing the covenant made in the waters of baptism and receiving anew the blessed purity that comes from full obedience to the law involved. In our day we gain a similar state of purity by partaking worthily of the sacrament of the Lord's supper." (McConkie, Bruce R. The Promised Messiah. Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1978, p. 436.)

 

In his epistle to the Hebrews, Paul shows how the Law of Moses and particularly the ritual associated with the Day of Atonement was an outward ordinance or a type which was fulfilled in Christ. Israel, Paul explained, had her tabernacle with its altar, ark, veil, and holy of holies, in which sacrifices and cleansing ordinances were performed. All of these the Holy Ghost manifested were in similitude of the coming ministry of the Son of God. Through those ordinances Israel anciently gained a forgiveness of sins because of their faith in the future coming of Christ, which the ordinances foreshadowed. That Christ, Paul testified, had now come, and in fulfillment of the ancient type had shed his own blood and entered into the eternal Holy of Holies, and thus those who embraced and served him in faith could also receive a remission of sins. (See Hebrews 9.)

 

 

(Joseph Fielding McConkie, Gospel Symbolism [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1999], 82.)

 

 

(Isaiah 58:1-7.)

 

1 Cry aloud, spare not, lift up thy voice like a trumpet, and shew my people their transgression, and the house of Jacob their sins.

 

2 Yet they seek me daily, and delight to know my ways, as a nation that did righteousness, and forsook not the ordinance of their God: they ask of me the ordinances of justice; they take delight in approaching to God.

 

3 ¶ Wherefore have we fasted, say they, and thou seest not? wherefore have we afflicted our soul, and thou takest no knowledge? Behold, in the day of your fast ye find pleasure, and exact all your labours.

 

4 Behold, ye fast for strife and debate, and to smite with the fist of wickedness: ye shall not fast as ye do this day, to make your voice to be heard on high.

 

5 Is it such a fast that I have chosen? a day for a man to afflict his soul? is it to bow down his head as a bulrush, and to spread sackcloth and ashes under him? wilt thou call this a fast, and an acceptable day to the LORD?

 

6 Is not this the fast that I have chosen? to loose the bands of wickedness, to undo the heavy burdens, and to let the oppressed go free, and that ye break every yoke?

 

7 Is it not to deal thy bread to the hungry, and that thou bring the poor that are cast out to thy house? when thou seest the naked, that thou cover him; and that thou hide not thyself from thine own flesh?

 

Likening Isa. 58 unto Ourselves

 

This chapter outlines the true law of the fast. In our fasting we are to do far more than simply abstain from two meals, nor are we to put on an appearance of one who is making a sacrifice. In a true fast we seek to help and bless others. We remove heavy burdens from the shoulders of others. We share our substance. If we do these things, we will be blessed spiritually and temporally. Our portion of light will increase. Our health will be strengthened. The Lord will be our guide in all things.

 

The Lord speaks again of the Sabbath. He promises that if we will turn away from our own pleasures on the Sabbath and turn to the things that will delight the Lord, he will lift us up to spiritual richness and bestow on us all the blessings of Jacob.

 

The True Law of the Fast (58:1-12)

 

As the headnote to Isa. 58 in the LDS edition of the Bible reads, 58:1-2 gives us the "true law of the fast, with its attendant blessings." That fasting is more than going without food and drink for a period of time is made unmistakably clear.

 

The passage opens with the Lord instructing Isaiah to proclaim the sins of the house of Israel (58:1), the people of the covenant both then and now, with boldness. They appear to be righteous, the Lord observes, being prayerful and obeying the ordinances of the gospel (58:2). Yet, as we soon learn, their righteousness is that of outward obedience only and not of the heart.

 

 Israel asks why the Lord has not blessed them for their sacrifice in fasting (58:3). The Lord answers that in their fasting they have not turned to him. They continue to seek pleasure and do business (58:3). They care more for the show of fasting—to afflict their soul, to bow the head, to sit on sackcloth and ashes (58:5)—than to attend to the true purposes of the fast: to help themselves and others to repent, to find respite from the emotional burdens they carry, and to help others with their problems and afflictions (58:6, 9-10). True fasting involves sharing with the hungry, the poor, and the naked, including needy members of one's own family (58:7, 10).

 

Those who obey this law are promised great blessings, including spiritual light (58:8); physical health (58:8); increased righteousness (58:8); answers to prayer (58:9); continual guidance from the Lord (58:11); a plenitude of spiritual food and water, representing the full blessings of the Atonement, even when others lack (58:11); and a restoration of their lands of inheritance (58:12). This passage parallels 1:10-20, in which the Lord rebukes the people for outward obedience without a true yielding of the heart.

 

 

Notes and Commentary

 

58:1 voice like a trumpet. Alma longed to speak with a voice like a trumpet, in loudness and clarity, when he cried out, "O that I were an angel . . . that I might go forth and speak with the trump of God, with a voice to shake the earth. . . . Yea, I would declare unto every soul, as with the voice of thunder, repentance and the plan of redemption, that they should repent and come unto our God, that there might not be more sorrow upon all the face of the earth" (Alma 29:1-2).

 

58:2 ordinance of their God. In this context, this expression refers to the laws of God.

 

ordinances of justice. This phrase may refer to righteous judgments, just laws, or ordinances that help to justify us before God.

 

58:3 Wherefore have we fasted. Here the people ask why the Lord doesn't recognize their efforts to fast.

 

 afflicted our soul. Some have viewed fasting as a time to seek suffering or self- abasement (Lev. 16:29, 31; 23:27, 32). In 58:5, the Lord rebukes such attitudes, saying he has not commanded a fast wherein a person would "afflict his soul."

 

ye find pleasure/exact all your labors. Here the prophet explains why the people's fasting and prayers for deliverance went unheard. They were not sincere in their devotion, they turned to their own pleasures "in the day of [their] fast" instead of losing themselves in the Lord and his work, and they required others to work instead of allowing them to participate in the spirit of the fast.

 

exact all your labours. This phrase may mean "inflict travail on others." Though the Israelites themselves may not have been working on their fast days, they were requiring others to work, most likely hired laborers.

 

58:4 fast for strife and debate/smite with the fist of wickedness. What should have been a religious observance that increased love and holiness led only to hunger and irritability, strife, debate, and physical fighting.

 

58:5 bow down his head as a bulrush. This expression means hanging the head to give the appearance of suffering.

 

sackcloth and ashes. These signs of self-abasement and mourning (22:12; 1 Kgs. 21:17-29; Job 42:6) were parts of a true fast in ancient Israel. For example, Daniel said, "I set my face unto the Lord God, to seek by prayer and supplications, with fasting, and sackcloth, and ashes: And I prayed unto the Lord my God, and made my confession" (Dan. 9:3-4). But outward signs of fasting, when they are performed to be seen by men, do not fulfill the requirement of the true fast.

 

58:6 the fast that I have chosen. To fast in the Lord's way, we must repent of our willful sins, our unkindnesses, and our selfishness (1:16-17).

 

loose the bands of wickedness. The bands of wickedness may be the chains or bonds of sin (2 Ne. 1:13, 23; 9:45). As President Spencer W. Kimball put it, "Sin [is] like handcuffs on the wrists, a ring in the nose, and slave bands around the neck."2 The bands of wickedness may also refer to the bonds of slavery and oppression discussed below.

 

undo the heavy burdens. These burdens might be those a master would place on a servant, or they could refer to the emotional burdens people carry.

 

 let the oppressed go free. People were oppressed under slavery or other forms of servitude. For instance, it was the practice in ancient times to take the property of the poor—even the clothes from their backs—as collateral for a debt. With no property, including clothing, the poor had no option but to stay in the servitude of their creditor (Job 22:6). The Lord urges mercy (Ezek. 18:7,  16), even to a removal of the debt (Deut. 24:12-13; Ex. 22:25-26).

 

break every yoke. Yokes are used to control beasts of burden to keep them in a straight path of servitude. The mentality and practice of using other human beings in this manner must be broken. Also, the bondage of sin is a yoke to the soul that fasting can help to break.

 

58:7 bread to the hungry/bring the poor/cover him. These actions are the essence of pure religion (Matt. 25:31-46; James 1:27). Those who have done these things will receive God's blessings (Ezek. 18:7-9,  16-17): their fasting will be recognized and their prayers heard.

 

hide not thyself. When someone is in distress we must not pretend that we do not see or["[pass] by on the other side" (Luke 10:31-32) and refuse to help (Deut. 22:1- 4). This injunction applies particularly to "thine own flesh," meaning members of our own families.

 

thine own flesh. Footnote c to 58:7 in the LDS edition of the Bible equates this phrase with "thy brother, or relative." In a broader sense, however, all men are children of the same God (Job 31:15) and should be treated as brothers.

 

 

(Donald W. Parry, Jay A. Parry, and Tina M. Peterson, Understanding Isaiah [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1998], 512.)

 

 

The purpose of fasting:  Spiritual in nature

 

  1. To lose the bands of wickedness (Repent of your sins)
  2. To undo the heavy burdens (No work on the Sabbath)
  3. Let the oppressed go free (Take care of the poor in society, search them out)
  4. Break every yoke (Who do you worship? What keeps you from serving Jehovah?)

 

 

 

Fasting in the Book of Mormon and the Bible

 

Stephen D. Ricks

 

For Latter-day Saints, a natural part of every month is fast Sunday, when they abstain from food and drink for two meals, contribute a fast offering from the money saved by fasting (if not contributing more than that), and join with others in worship and in bearing witness to the truth. On other occasions, special needs will also warrant fasting: an illness, preparation for giving or receiving a priesthood blessing, a vital decision, or a persistent dilemma. The practice of fasting, so significant and cherished a part of the Latter-day Saint religious life, is also abundantly attested in ancient Israel and in the Book of Mormon.

 

Fasts may be individual and private or communal and public; they may be periodic and institutionalized (e.g., in our own practice, fast Sunday) or spontaneous (i.e., fasts which are not explicitly prescribed). Among the ancient Israelites and the Nephites, all of these types of fasting are attested, and will be considered in this paper.

 

Periodic and Institutionalized Fasts

 

1. Day of Atonement Fasting. The only periodic fast prescribed for the Israelites in the Pentateuch (the five books of Moses) occurs on the Day of Atonement, "the tenth day of the seventh month" of the ancient Jewish calendar (the first month of the current Jewish calendar), when the Lord commanded the Israelites to meet together to "afflict [their] souls" (i.e., to fast) and to "offer an offering made by fire unto the Lord" (Leviticus 23:27ff.; see also 16:29, 31; Numbers 29:7-10). There are no references to this festival in the Old Testament outside of the books of Moses, although Isaiah 58:3-7 may refer to abuses of the fast associated with the Day of Atonement.

 

The observance of the Day of Atonement fast is never explicitly mentioned in the Book of Mormon. However, its observance may be implied in Alma 30:2, where fasting, mourning, and prayer are referred to, and in Alma 45:1, where fasting, rejoicing, and prayer are mentioned as taking place at the beginning of the year, at the time when the Day of Atonement rites were probably observed among the Nephites. This presumption that these two fasts reflect observances associated with the Pentateuch is, I think, strengthened by the observation in Alma 30:3 (following the mention of fasting and associated rites) that "the people did observe to keep the commandments of the Lord; and they were strict in observing the ordinances of God, according to the law of Moses; for they were taught to keep the law of Moses until it should be fulfilled." fn

 

2. Other Periodic Fasts. Four periodic fasts commemorating events surrounding or immediately following the destruction of the kingdom of Judah by the Babylonians are mentioned in Zechariah 7:5 and 8:19: (1) the fast that was held to observe the beginning of the siege of Jerusalem by Nebuchadnezzar on the tenth day of the tenth month (Tebet) in the ninth year of the reign of Zedekiah (cf. 2 Kings 25:1; Jeremiah 39:1); (2) the fast commemorating the breach of the wall of Jerusalem on the ninth day of the fourth month (Tammuz) in the eleventh year of Zedekiah's reign (Jeremiah 39:2, 52:6-7); (3) the fast memorializing the destruction of the temple on the tenth day of the fifth month (Ab) in the nineteenth year of Nebuchadnezzar's rule (cf. Jeremiah 52:12-13; 2 Kings 25:8-9); (4) the fast commemorating the murder of the Babylonian puppet Gedaliah on the third day of the seventh month (Tishri; cf. 2 Kings 25:24-25; Jeremiah 41:1). Since all of these fasts commemorate events during the Babylonian conquest, the destruction of Jerusalem and afterwards (i.e., in the period immediately following the departure of Lehi's family from Jerusalem), they are, understandably, without parallels in the Book of Mormon.

 

Spontaneous Fasts

 

1. Fasting Following a Death. Both the Bible and the Book of Mormon record instances of fasting as a sign of mourning following a death. After the defeat and death of Saul and his sons, the men of Jabesh Gilead fasted seven days (1 Samuel 31:13; 1 Chronicles 10:12 1 Chronicles 10:12), as did David and his companions (2 Samuel 1:12). Similarly, public fasting occurs in the Book of Mormon in conjunction with prayer and mourning after the murder of the chief judge Seezoram (Helaman 9:10). No specific reason is mentioned in the Book of Mormon for these prayers, but they may have been to obtain solace for the living rather than mercy for the dead. Individual fasting following a death is also attested in ancient Israel (2 Samuel 3:35).

 

The practice of fasting as a sign of mourning following a death appears to have been a customary feature of pre-exilic Israelite religion (cf. 1 Samuel 31:13; 2 Samuel 1:12; 3:35; 1 Chronicles 10:12 1 Chronicles 10:12). However, the practice is not recorded for the post-exilic period or in the New Testament. It is also of importance that fasting as a sign of mourning is recorded in the Book of Mormon only in pre-Easter passages (so Helaman 9:10), but never following the appearance of the risen Christ to the Nephites.

 

2. Petitionary Fasting. Spontaneous fasting, both in public and in private, for a specific purpose, is attested several times in the Book of Mormon and in the Old Testament. When Alma the Younger lay speechless and paralyzed, his father assembled the priests "to fast, and to pray to the Lord their God that he would open the mouth of Alma, that he might speak" (Mosiah 27:22-23; see also Alma 10:7). Similarly, David "fasted, and went in, and lay all night upon the earth" as he prayed to the Lord to spare the life of his first son by Bathsheba (2 Samuel 12:16ff.; for other examples of petitionary fasting see Nehemiah 1:4; Psalms 35:13; 69:10; 109:24; Daniel 6:18; 9:3). Esther 4:16 provides an instance of communal petitionary fasting, and accounts of public petitionary fasting are found in Judges 20:26; 2 Chronicles 20:3 2 Chronicles 20:3; Ezra 8:21, 23; Jeremiah 14:12; Jer. 36:636:6, 9.

 

3. Preparatory Fasting. Fasting as an act preparatory to seeking the gifts of the Spirit can be seen in the account of the sons of Mosiah, who had given themselves "to much prayer, and fasting; therefore they had the spirit of prophecy, and the spirit of revelation" (Alma 17:3, 9; see also Alma 5:46, 8:26). In a slightly different vein, Moses fasted on the mountain for forty days when receiving the Ten Commandments (see Exodus 34:28; Deuteronomy 9:9), Saul fasted before visiting the witch of Endor (1 Samuel 28:20), and Ahab and Jezebel proclaimed a public fast in anticipation of the trial of Naboth (1 Kings 21:9, 12).

 

4. Fasting As a Religious Exercise. Fasting for no explicit reason is not attested in the Old Testament before the Babylonian exile. However, this practice burst into full bloom during the early pre-Christian centuries, and is frequently mentioned in the intertestamental literature and in the New Testament (cf. Testament of Joseph 3:4; 9:2; Judith 6:8; Luke 2:36-38). It was probably against hypocritical fasting of this sort that Jesus inveighed: "Moreover when ye fast, be not, as the hypocrites, of a sad countenance: for they disfigure their faces, that they may appear unto men to fast. . . . When thou fastest, anoint thine head, and wash thy face, that thou appear not unto men to fast, but unto thy Father which is in secret" (Matthew 6:16-18). (This does not, I believe, represent a rejection of fasting as such, but rather a condemnation of its improper practice.) To an extent, this fasting had itself become somewhat institutionalized, and was observed on a regular basis by the Pharisees and possibly also by the disciples of John the Baptist. The Pharisee in Jesus' parable was probably referring to such a practice when he boasted, "I fast twice in the week" (Luke 18:12). Both later Jewish and Christian traditions agree in identifying these two days as Monday and Thursday. fn The New Testament makes no specific mention of fasts regularly observed by the primitive Christian community. However, the Didache, or TEACHING OF THE TWELVE APOSTLES, dating from about A.D. 100 and giving one of the earliest post-New Testament glimpses of the life of the Church, provides for two fasts each week, on Wednesday and Friday, and not on Monday and Thursday "with the hypocrites" (i.e., the Pharisees, or possibly the Jews in general). fn The pre-Easter portions of the Book of Mormon contain three references to such a practice among the Nephites (Omni 1:26; Alma 6:6; Helaman 3:35), the last two in conjunction with communal worship. After the appearance of the risen Christ to the Nephites, the only mention of fasting in the Book of Mormon is as a devotional exercise in the worship of the Christian community (3 Nephi 27:1; 4 Nephi 1:12; Moroni 6:5).

 

There are several types of fasting mentioned in the Bible which are not attested in the Book of Mormon, including penitential fasting (Deuteronomy 9:18; 1 Samuel 7:6; 1 Kings 21:27; Ezra 9:1; Joel 1:14, 2:12-17; Jonah 3:5-9), fasting following a misfortune besides death (Joshua 7:6; 1 Samuel 1:17, 20:34; 1 Kings 21:4; Esther 4:1, 3) and fasting in preparation for battle (1 Samuel 14:24).

 

There are several references in the Old Testament (but, again, none in the New Testament) to the practice of penitential fasting. After commanding the Israelites to "put away the strange gods and Ashtaroth from among [them]," Samuel ordered them to gather at Mizpeh. "And they gathered together to Mizpeh, and drew water; and poured it out before the Lord, and fasted on that day, and said there, We have sinned against the Lord" (1 Samuel 7:3-6). Even Ahab, when he heard the prophecy of doom pronounced against him by Elijah, "rent his clothes, and put sackcloth upon his flesh, and fasted, and lay in sackcloth, and went softly" (1 Kings 21:27). In response to these evidences of penitence, the Lord told Elijah: "I will not bring the evil in his [Ahab's] days: but in his son's days will I bring the evil upon his house" (1 Kings 21:28-29; cf. also Deuteronomy 9:18; Ezra 10:6; Nehemiah 9:1; Joel 1:14, 2:12-17; Jonah 3:5-9).

 

Fasting as a sign of mourning following a calamity besides death is attested in ancient Israel but is not found in the Book of Mormon. When Saul threw a javelin at his son Jonathan for having defended David, "Jonathan arose from the table in fierce anger and did eat no meat the second day of the month: for he was grieved for David, because his father had done him shame" (1 Samuel 20:34). Similarly, following the unexpected discomfiture of the Israelites by the people of Ai, Joshua and the elders of Israel fasted and lay prostrate before the ark of the Lord until evening (see Joshua 7:6).

 

In preparation for a battle against the Philistines, Saul forbade his soldiers to eat until evening "that I may be avenged on mine enemies" (1 Samuel 14:24). Jonathan disobeyed his father's directive at his peril.

 

In the Bible, other ritual acts are frequently associated with fasting: donning sackcloth (1 Kings 21:27; Nehemiah 9:1; Psalm 69:11; Isaiah 58:5; Daniel 9:3; Jonah 3:5), strewing ashes on oneself (Esther 4:1, 3; Isaiah 58:5; Daniel 9:3; Jonah 3:5), weeping (2 Samuel 1:12, 12:21-23; Nehemiah 1:4; Joel 2:12-17), prayer (Nehemiah 1:4; Daniel 9:3), mourning (2 Samuel 1:12; Nehemiah 1:4; Joel 2:12-17), making a libation of water (1 Samuel 7:6), anointing and washing oneself (2 Samuel 12:20), and offering peace and burnt offerings (Judges 20:26). In the Book of Mormon, the number of recorded acts connected with fasting is smaller: mourning is recorded twice (Alma 30:2; Helaman 9:10—though the exact manner of mourning is not more explicitly stated) and anointing and washing oneself is mentioned once (3 Nephi 13:17), while prayer is frequently mentioned (Omni 1:26; Mosiah 27:22, 23; Alma 5:46, 6:6, 17:3, 9, 28:6, 30:2, 45:1; Helaman 3:35; 3 Nephi 13:17, 27:1; 4 Nephi 1:12; Moroni 6:5).

 

In summary, recorded instances of fasting in the Old Testament and in the pre-Easter sections of the Book of Mormon show numerous sources of motivation, but communal fasting as a religious act plays a relatively minor role. By the time of Christ, however, religious devotion had become a major motive for fasting, and remained so both in the primitive Church in Palestine and in the Christian community in the New World.

 

 

(Paul R. Cheesman, ed., The Book of Mormon: The Keystone Scripture [Provo: BYU Religious Studies Center, 1988], 127.)

 

Verse 9 – The people weren’t afraid of Jeremiah’s prophesies, they lost the light of Christ.  The Day of Atonement was in the 7th month.  Having a fast in the 9th month was unusual, they were in a severe drought and were fasting for rain, and they were highly afflicted!

 

Verses 10-32 – The story of Jeremiah’s prophesies read to Jehoiakim and his court.  This is like the Book of Mormon’s story of Abinadi.  The king wants Jeremiah dead, they didn’t like the temple sermon in chapter 26 and the reading of his prophesies against the kingdom of Judah.  He has rejected the Lord’s prophet; he has lost the light of Christ.  Verse 30, the kingdom ends with your family, your son will not sit upon this throne.

 

(Jeremiah 22:18-19.)

 

18 Therefore thus saith the LORD concerning Jehoiakim the son of Josiah king of Judah; They shall not lament for him, saying, Ah my brother! or, Ah sister! they shall not lament for him, saying, Ah lord! or, Ah his glory!

 

19 He shall be buried with the burial of an ass, drawn and cast forth beyond the gates of Jerusalem.

 

The people may have been involved in his death; they didn’t like him very much.  His calling and destruction were made sure. 

 

 

Jeremiah 21 – This starts the section of Zedekiah being a vassal king of Babylon over Judah, Zedekiah has ruled for 10 years.  Lehi is in the promised land by this time.  The way of life was to leave the city and area, or face the destruction to come.  Between 1 Nephi 18 – 2 Nephi 1

 

The Lord tells the people He will fight against them; he is behind Babylon’s reign of terror against them, they are His servant.

 

 

(Jeremiah 21:1-8.)

 

1 The word which came unto Jeremiah from the LORD, when king Zedekiah sent unto him Pashur the son of Melchiah, and Zephaniah the son of Maaseiah the priest, saying,

 

2 Enquire, I pray thee, of the LORD for us; for Nebuchadrezzar king of Babylon maketh war against us; if so be that the LORD will deal with us according to all his wondrous works, that he may go up from us.

 

3 ¶ Then said Jeremiah unto them, Thus shall ye say to Zedekiah:

 

4 Thus saith the LORD God of Israel; Behold, I will turn back the weapons of war that are in your hands, wherewith ye fight against the king of Babylon, and against the Chaldeans, which besiege you without the walls, and I will assemble them into the midst of this city.

 

5 And I myself will fight against you with an outstretched hand and with a strong arm, even in anger, and in fury, and in great wrath.

 

6 And I will smite the inhabitants of this city, both man and beast: they shall die of a great pestilence.

 

7 And afterward, saith the LORD, I will deliver Zedekiah king of Judah, and his servants, and the people, and such as are left in this city from the pestilence, from the sword, and from the famine, into the hand of Nebuchadrezzar king of Babylon, and into the hand of their enemies, and into the hand of those that seek their life: and he shall smite them with the edge of the sword; he shall not spare them, neither have pity, nor have mercy.

 

8 ¶ And unto this people thou shalt say, Thus saith the LORD; Behold, I set before you the way of life, and the way of death.

 

Zedekiah didn’t learn from the past!  He rebelled like the others before him, No one learned from Josiah’s reforms.  The siege lasted almost 1 year, when the Babylonians broke into Jerusalem they saw a horrific sight, cannibalism.  The last thing Zedekiah saw was the killing of his sons before they burned out his eyes.  Those taken as slaves were the better part of the wicked people, perhaps they will make changes in their lives to improve and be taught the covenant.

 

Ezekiel has been in Babylon for 5 years teaching the Jews who were taken away.

 

A Prophecy against Zedekiah (Jer. 21:1-10)

 

During Nebuchadrezzar's fn siege of Jerusalem in 587 B.C., King Zedekiah sent two messengers, Pashur and Zephaniah, to Jeremiah with the request that he inquire of the Lord on behalf of the king and all of Judah "if so be that the Lord will deal with us according to all his wondrous works, that he may go up from us" (Jer. 21:2). The phrase "wondrous works" (Hebrew, niple'ot) is used throughout the Old Testament to refer to the "mighty acts" that the Lord performed in the deliverance of Israel from Egypt. fn Zedekiah hoped that the Lord God of Israel would deliver his people now through his miraculous power as he had at the time of Moses from the Egyptians and most recently from the Assyrians at the time of Hezekiah (2 Kgs. 18-19; Isa. 36-37). The Lord's reply was grim. Not only would he not aid Judah in her defense (Jer. 21:4) but, he said, "I myself will fight against you with an outstretched hand and with a strong arm, even in anger, and in fury, and in great wrath" (Jer. 21:5). The phrase "mighty hand and a stretched out arm" is another key formula used in reference to the Lord's strength in defeating Pharaoh's army, whose destruction is portrayed as a military encounter during the Exodus (Deut. 4:34; 5:15; 7:19; 11:2; 26:8). fn In Jeremiah, though, the adjectives of the formula are switched, "outstretched hand and strong arm" indicating the reversal that has come about through Judah's transgressions. Whereas before the Lord fought for Israel against her enemies, now the Lord will join the enemy and fight against his people. fn In addition to this grim tiding, the Lord said through Jeremiah: "He that abideth in this city shall die by the sword, and by the famine, and by the pestilence: but he that goeth out, and falleth to the Chaldeans that besiege you, he shall live, and his life shall be unto him for a prey" (Jer. 21:9). The only chance for survival is surrender, a message for which Jeremiah would be branded a traitor (Jer. 38:2-4).

 

 

Prophecies against the Kings of Judah (Jer. 21:11-22:30)

 

The passage in Jeremiah 21:11 through 22:9 is a call to the kings in the house of David to be faithful to the ethical imperatives of the covenant to ensure social justice: to execute judgment (Jer. 21:12) and righteousness and to "deliver the spoiled out of the hand of the oppressor: and do no wrong, do no violence to the stranger, the fatherless, nor the widow, neither shed innocent blood" (Jer. 22:3). If they failed to do this, as they had in the past, then destruction would come. After the destruction, many of the world would pass by Jerusalem, asking, "Wherefore hath the Lord done thus unto this great city? Then they shall answer, Because they have forsaken the covenant of the Lord their God, and worshipped other gods, and served them" (Jer. 22:8-9).

 

Chapter 22 contains several short prophecies directed against three successive kings of Judah: Jehoahaz, Jehoiakim, and Jehoiachin. Each of these kings is judged against the standard of the covenant and is found wanting.

 

Jeremiah 22:10-12 prophesies the captivity of Shallum, another name for Jehoahaz (1 Chron. 3:15) son of Josiah, which was fulfilled when he was removed from the throne and taken to Egypt by Pharaoh Necho in 609 B.C. (2 Kgs. 23:33-34).

 

Jeremiah 22:13-19 is directed against Jehoahaz's successor, Jehoiakim, who attempted to justify his unjust reign by the props of a new and magnificent palace instead of judging the cause of the poor and the needy (vv. 13-16). His reward will be an ignominious death and "the burial of an ass, drawn and cast forth beyond the gates of Jerusalem" (v. 19). This prophecy is expanded in another prophecy, in which Jeremiah declared, "His dead body shall be cast out in the day to the heat, and in the night to the frost" (Jer. 36:30). The account of his death in 2 Kings 24:6 simply says that he "slept with his fathers." But the situation surrounding his untimely death in the face of the punitive expedition that was shortly to be sent from Babylon because of his revolt against Nebuchadnezzar — a situation that resulted in the siege and capture of Jerusalem and the exile of his son — has led some to suspect that he may have been assassinated. fn

 

Jeremiah 22:20-30 contains an oracle against Coniah, another name for Jehoiachin, son of Jehoiakim. His punishment will be like that of a useless, broken pot, to be cast off by the Lord to join his countrymen in exile to Babylon. This prophecy is accompanied by the promise that his seed would not sit upon the throne of Judah. It was fulfilled when he was replaced by the conquering Babylonians with his uncle Mattaniah, whose name was changed to Zedekiah. Jehoiachin is mentioned as being still alive in Babylon — the king in exile — as late as 562 B.C., when Nebuchadnezzar died (2 Kgs. 25:27-30; Jer. 52:31-34).

 

A Prophecy of Restoration (Jer. 23)

 

Jeremiah 23 may be best categorized as a messianic oracle. Verses 1 through 4 pronounce doom on the "pastors" (shepherds) of Israel, a metaphor often referring to Israel's spiritual and political leaders — prophets, priests, and kings (Ezek. 34; John 10). Instead of caring for the sheep, these leaders had scattered them. It would take the Lord, the Good Shepherd, to gather his sheep and "set up shepherds over them which shall feed them" (Jer. 23:4). If applied to the first coming of the Messiah, this prophecy would refer to a spiritual gathering made possible through the Atonement. A completion of its fulfillment is to be found in the Second Coming, when God will "raise unto David a righteous Branch, and a King shall reign and prosper, and shall execute judgment and justice in the earth" (Jer. 23:5). When those days come, "they shall no more say, The Lord liveth, which brought up the children of Israel out of the land of Egypt; But, The Lord liveth, which brought up and which led the seed of the house of Israel out of the north country, and from all countries whither I had driven them; and they shall dwell in their own land" (Jer. 23:7-8).

 

Jeremiah 23:9-40 continues the denunciation of the wicked shepherds, specifying the wickedness of the false prophets and priests. This section provides a key for distinguishing and dealing with false, as opposed to true, prophets. Their sins are grievous: "They commit adultery, and walk in lies: they strengthen also the hands of evildoers, that none doth return from his wickedness" (Jer. 23:14). This description brings to mind Christ's injunction given in the Sermon on the Mount and repeated to the Nephites: "Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. Ye shall know them by their fruits" (Matt. 7:15-16; 3 Ne. 14:15-16). Because these false prophets have come on their own accord, the Lord said, "I have not sent these prophets, yet they ran: I have not spoken to them, yet they prophesied" (Jer. 23:21); "I have heard what the prophets said, that prophesy lies in my name, saying, I have dreamed, I have dreamed. How long shall this be in the heart of the prophets that prophesy lies? yea, they are prophets of the deceit of their own heart; Which think to cause my people to forget my name by their dreams which they tell every man to his neighbour, as their fathers have forgotten my name for Baal" (Jer. 23:25-27). Consequently they speak their own words and not the words of the Lord; "they speak a vision of their own heart, and not out of the mouth of the Lord" (Jer. 23:16). They were popular because their message was what the people wanted to hear: "The Lord hath said, Ye shall have peace; and they say unto every one that walketh after the imagination of his own heart, No evil shall come upon you" (Jer. 23:17). fn Following such prophets is nothing less than idolatry — attempting to find divine approval for selfish interests — and the Lord accused them of such, characterizing these false prophets as those "which think to cause my people to forget my name . . . as their fathers have forgotten my name for Baal" (Jer. 23:27).

 

The same image of "one that walketh after the imagination of his own heart" (Jer. 23:17) occurs in the Doctrine and Covenants and is applied to our day. The people of this generation are likewise accused of idolatry: "They seek not the Lord to establish his righteousness, but every man walketh in his own way, and after the image of his own god, whose image is in the likeness of the world, and whose substance is that of an idol, which waxeth old and shall perish in Babylon, even Babylon the great, which shall fall" (D&C 1:16; emphasis added).

 

Two Baskets of Figs (Jer. 24)

 

After Nebuchadnezzar captured Jerusalem in 597 (2 Kgs. 24:10-16), he took the young king Jehoiachin and many leading citizens into exile in Babylon. Among these were Ezekiel and Daniel. Nebuchadnezzar then replaced Jehoiachin with his father's brother, Mattaniah, changing his name to Zedekiah. In response to those in Jerusalem who continued to believe they had been preserved from total destruction because of their righteousness, the Lord showed Jeremiah the vision of the two baskets of figs. The Lord revealed that the good figs represented the fate of those who had been taken to Babylon, and the bad represented the fate of those who had been left behind. To the good figs in Babylon the Lord spoke of hope: "I will bring them again to this land: and I will build them, and not pull them down; and I will plant them, and not pluck them up. And I will give them an heart to know me, that I am the Lord: and they shall be my people, and I will be their God: for they shall return unto me with their whole heart" (Jer. 24:6-7). The restoration and return to the Promised Land is phrased in the same language as the original covenant: "They shall be my people, and I will be their God" (Jer. 24:7). The evil figs would be delivered to the kingdoms of the earth and would be consumed by the sword, famine, and pestilence (Jer. 24:8-10). That prophecy was fulfilled in 587 B.C. with the destruction of Jerusalem and the temple and the capture of King Zedekiah (2 Kgs. 25). Lehi, a good fig, was delivered by the Lord from this fate and taken to a new promised land, a land given by covenant.

 

 

(Kent P. Jackson, ed., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 4: 1 Kings to Malachi [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1993], 252.)

 

 

Evil doesn’t mean sin, just an opposite of good.  Indifference could be evil.

 

Elder Neal A. Maxwell

From Men and Women of Christ:

If we enlist and take the Savior's yoke upon us we "shall find rest unto [our] souls" (Matthew 11:29). If we are only part-time soldiers, though, partially yoked, we experience quite the opposite: frustration, irritation, and the absence of His full grace and spiritual rest. In that case weaknesses persist and satisfactions are intermittent. . . Actually the partially yoked experience little spiritual satisfaction, because they are burdened by carrying the awful weight of the natural man -- without any of the joys that come from progressing toward becoming "the man of Christ." They have scarcely "[begun] to be enlightened" (Alma 32:34). The meek and fully yoked, on the other hand, find God's reassuring grace and see their weakness yielding to strength (see Ether 12:27).

Strange as it seems, a few of the partially yoked, undeservedly wearing the colors of the kingdom, are just close enough to the prescribed path and process to be able to observe in others some of the visible costs of discipleship. Sobered by that observation, they want victory without battle and expect campaign ribbons merely for watching; but there is no witness until after the trial of their faith (see Ether 12:6).

These same Church members know just enough about the doctrines to converse superficially on them, but their scant knowledge about the deep doctrines is inadequate for deep discipleship (see 1 Corinthians 2:10). Thus uninformed about the deep doctrines, they make no deep change in their lives. They lack the faith to "give place" (Alma 32:27) consistently for real discipleship. Such members move out a few hundred yards from the entrance to the straight and narrow path and repose on the first little rise, thinking, "Well, this is all there is to it"; and they end up living far below their possibilities. While not as distant as those King Benjamin described "For how knoweth a man the master whom he has not served, and who is a stranger unto him, and is far from the thoughts and intents of his heart?" (Mosiah 5:13) -- these people are not drawing closer either. (Men and Women of Christ. Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1991, pp. 2-3)

  (Jeremiah 24:1-10.)

1 The LORD shewed me, and, behold, two baskets of figs were set before the temple of the LORD, after that Nebuchadrezzar king of Babylon had carried away captive Jeconiah the son of Jehoiakim king of Judah, and the princes of Judah, with the carpenters and smiths, from Jerusalem, and had brought them to Babylon.

 

2 One basket had very good figs, even like the figs that are first ripe: and the other basket had very naughty figs, which could not be eaten, they were so bad.

 

3 Then said the LORD unto me, What seest thou, Jeremiah? And I said, Figs; the good figs, very good; and the evil, very evil, that cannot be eaten, they are so evil.

 

4 ¶ Again the word of the LORD came unto me, saying,

 

5 Thus saith the LORD, the God of Israel; Like these good figs, so will I acknowledge them that are carried away captive of Judah, whom I have sent out of this place into the land of the Chaldeans for their good.

 

6 For I will set mine eyes upon them for good, and I will bring them again to this land: and I will build them, and not pull them down; and I will plant them, and not pluck them up.

 

7 And I will give them an heart to know me, that I am the LORD: and they shall be my people, and I will be their God: for they shall return unto me with their whole heart.

 

8 ¶ And as the evil figs, which cannot be eaten, they are so evil; surely thus saith the LORD, So will I give Zedekiah the king of Judah, and his princes, and the residue of Jerusalem, that remain in this land, and them that dwell in the land of Egypt:

 

9 And I will deliver them to be removed into all the kingdoms of the earth for their hurt, to be a reproach and a proverb, a taunt and a curse, in all places whither I shall drive them.

 

10 And I will send the sword, the famine, and the pestilence, among them, till they be consumed from off the land that I gave unto them and to their fathers

 

The good figs still had the light of Christ, while the bad figs were like the king, totally dark, no light left.

 

An element of interest in Jeremiah's prophetic work is the manner in which he taught object lessons (see Teacher; Teacher Development). For instance, Jeremiah called attention to the impending fall of Jerusalem and captivity of her inhabitants by wearing the yoke of an ox (Jer. 27:2). He showed his faith in the eventual restoration of Israel to her homeland by buying a piece of land (32:1-15). He conveyed some of his messages with parables. In Jeremiah 18:1-10, the Lord inspired him to ask his listeners to observe a potter who had to rework some "marred" clay. He noted that the potter represented the Lord and the marred clay the inhabitants of Jerusalem. So poignantly disturbing was this parable that some of Jeremiah's listeners began to plot against his life (18:18-23). In jer. 24:2Jeremiah 24:1-10 he declared that the Lord showed him two baskets of figs, one good and one inedible. The good figs represented those taken captive whom the Lord would "acknowledge." The inedible figs, which the Lord would discard, or have "removed," represented king Zedekiah, his princes, and those Judeans who had fled to Egypt.

 

Jeremiah and his writings were well respected by his contemporary, Lehi, and later Book of Mormon prophets who possessed a copy of some of Jeremiah's prophecies on the plates of brass (cf. 1 Ne. 5:13; 7:14). A later Book of Mormon prophet, Nephi 2, indicates that Jeremiah had prophesied of the messiah's first coming (Hel. 8:13-20). However, current texts of Jeremiah do not have clear references to this event, underscoring the observation that in the transmission of the biblical text parts may have been lost, or that Lehi may have possessed a fuller version. This is not surprising since ancient evidence both from Dead Sea fragments and from the Septuagint version of Jeremiah suggests that the text of his book has not been well preserved.

 

The book of Jeremiah presents rich insights into the attributes of God, the nature of prophets and prophecy, and varied teaching techniques. The available text of Jeremiah, however, suggests that scribes or others have allowed some parts that were "plain and precious" (cf. 1 Ne. 13:20-42) to be omitted.

 

 

(Encyclopedia of Mormonism, 1-4 vols., edited by Daniel H. Ludlow (New York: Macmillan, 1992), 722.)

 

Babylon won’t be around very long.  A prophet named Ezra will lead the remnant back to Jerusalem. He gets them to stop worshipping other gods (polytheism) not all who were exiled want to return to Jerusalem, they like the ways of the world too much in Babylon.  They forgot who they were and who they were supposed to worship!

 

The Lord cleanses the entire environment, all the wicked will be destroyed.  I and II Samuel I and II Kings are written to the people in the good figs basket.  These are the reasons you’re in this predicament, you broke the covenant made with Moses and Joshua.  They didn’t know what covenant the Lord is talking about, this opens the door for prophets like Ezra.

 

Ezekiel is the prophet of the captivity.  Ezra the scribe helps the remnant understand what the law is.  The captivity lasts 60-70 years.  The Lord is planning for the rebirth of Jerusalem, he tries teaching this to Jeremiah. 

 

The returning remnant brought back parts of the temple, but not all.  They had to be clean to do this.  Only a small group returned.  There was a small Jewish community in Iraq up to the last century.  The Babylonian Talmud is the most popular Talmud available.

 

 

God looks at every individual and knows which basket we fit in.  He knows what is going on in each individual.  He will do all He can to work with you.  He alone knows what it takes to bring us home.

 

Jeremiah 21:10 – The city is gone; the land will be cleansed by fire.

 

Jeremiah 21:11-14 – This is what the kings of Judah were supposed to do, like King Benjamin, looking out for the welfare of the people.  They acted like King Noah.

 

Verse 13 – “I am against thee O inhabitants above the valley on the rock of the plateau” this was Bruce’s translation of this verse.

 

(Jeremiah 22:1-17.)

 

1 Thus saith the LORD; Go down to the house of the king of Judah, and speak there this word,

 

2 And say, Hear the word of the LORD, O king of Judah, that sittest upon the throne of David, thou, and thy servants, and thy people that enter in by these gates:

 

3 Thus saith the LORD; Execute ye judgment and righteousness, and deliver the spoiled out of the hand of the oppressor: and do no wrong, do no violence to the stranger, the fatherless, nor the widow, neither shed innocent blood in this place.

 

4 For if ye do this thing indeed, then shall there enter in by the gates of this house kings sitting upon the throne of David, riding in chariots and on horses, he, and his servants, and his people.

 

5 But if ye will not hear these words, I swear by myself, saith the LORD, that this house shall become a desolation.

 

6 For thus saith the LORD unto the king's house of Judah; Thou art Gilead unto me, and the head of Lebanon: yet surely I will make thee a wilderness, and cities which are not inhabited.

 

7 And I will prepare destroyers against thee, every one with his weapons: and they shall cut down thy choice cedars, and cast them into the fire.

 

8 And many nations shall pass by this city, and they shall say every man to his neighbour, Wherefore hath the LORD done thus unto this great city?

 

9 Then they shall answer, Because they have forsaken the covenant of the LORD their God, and worshipped other gods, and served them.

 

10 ¶ Weep ye not for the dead, neither bemoan him: but weep sore for him that goeth away: for he shall return no more, nor see his native country.

 

11 For thus saith the LORD touching Shallum the son of Josiah king of Judah, which reigned instead of Josiah his father, which went forth out of this place; He shall not return thither any more:

 

12 But he shall die in the place whither they have led him captive, and shall see this land no more.

 

13 ¶ Woe unto him that buildeth his house by unrighteousness, and his chambers by wrong; that useth his neighbour's service without wages, and giveth him not for his work;

 

14 That saith, I will build me a wide house and large chambers, and cutteth him out windows; and it is cieled with cedar, and painted with vermilion.

 

15 Shalt thou reign, because thou closest thyself in cedar? did not thy father eat and drink, and do judgment and justice, and then it was well with him?

 

16 He judged the cause of the poor and needy; then it was well with him: was not this to know me? saith the LORD.

 

17 But thine eyes and thine heart are not but for thy covetousness, and for to shed innocent blood, and for oppression, and for violence, to do it.

 

 

 

Jeremiah in the Time of Jehoiakim, 609-598 B.C.

 

Jehoiakim submitted to Egypt and eventually, in 604 B.C., to the Babylonians under their new king Nebuchadnezzar (2 Kgs. 24:1). As noted by the author of Kings, "he did that which was evil in the sight of the Lord, according to all that his fathers had done" (2 Kgs. 23:37). In 601, sensing Babylonian vulnerability in their war against Egypt, he rebelled. Nebuchadnezzar was not able to address the rebellion in Judah until 597, when he besieged Jerusalem to punish the rebels. Just before Jerusalem fell Jehoiakim died; some speculate that the timing of his death suggests either that he was killed in battle or that he was assassinated by pro-Babylonian factions. He was replaced by his son Jehoiachin (in Jeremiah called Jeconiah or Coniah), who reigned in Judah only three months. Nebuchadnezzar subdued Judah with restraint and exiled their king along with many others, including Ezekiel and possibly Daniel. Nebuchadnezzar then put Zedekiah—Jehoiachin's uncle and Josiah's son—on the throne (2 Kgs. 24:17).

 

Jeremiah had nothing good to say about Jehoiakim and vigorously denounced him, comparing him unfavorably with his father Josiah (e.g., Jer. 22:13-19). It was Jehoiakim who banned Jeremiah from the temple and upon hearing the prophetic words recorded on his scroll cut them up and burned them—as recorded in Jeremiah 36. Jeremiah prophesied that the king's death would not be lamented and that he would be "buried with the burial of an ass" (Jer. 22:18-19).

 

Jeremiah suffered much rejection and persecution during those years, resulting in the threat on his life by officials after the temple sermon (Jer. 7; 26). Even his fellow citizens of Anathoth and his family turned against him (Jer. 11:21; 12:6). In this period he recorded: "The word of the Lord came also unto me, saying, Thou shalt not take thee a wife, neither shalt thou have sons or daughters in this place" (Jer. 16:1-2), apparently indicating that he would not be allowed to have a normal family life. It was probably in this period that he wrote many of his personal laments found interspersed in chapters 7 through 20

 

 

(Kent P. Jackson, ed., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 4: 1 Kings to Malachi [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1993], 200.)

 

 

Verse 17 describes Jehoiakim to a T. 

 

Some Warnings (Jer. 25-26)

 

Jeremiah 25 is dated to the fourth year of the reign of Jehoiakim, 605 B.C. Jeremiah reminded the people that he had spent twenty-three years warning them about the consequences of their apostasy. Drawing heavily on phrases and images found in his temple sermon in 609 (chaps. 7, 26), fn Jeremiah identified the enemy from the north—of whom he had been warning Judah from the beginning—as Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon. He announced that because the people had not repented they would be destroyed and taken into captivity.

 

In the first part of chapter 25 Jeremiah predicted, "And this whole land shall be a desolation, and an astonishment; and these nations shall serve the king of Babylon seventy years" (Jer. 25:11). Because the return from exile began in 539, the precise time-frame indicated by this number is debated. A passage in Zechariah 1:12 seems to apply the number to the years between the destruction of the temple in 587 and its rebuilding in 520-15, but in any case, it was an indication that the Exile would be a long one.

 

The second part of Jeremiah 25 involves the image of the Lord giving to Jeremiah the divine cup of wrath, which the prophet was to deliver to all nations, spreading destruction over the whole world—a fulfillment of his calling to be a prophet to the nations (Jer. 25:15-38). This passage will be examined in conjunction with Jeremiah 46 through 51. fn

 

Jeremiah 26 is an account of Jeremiah's temple sermon, in which he warned the inhabitants of Judah that they would find no divine protection on account of the temple unless they would repent. In response to these words, the enraged audience demanded that he be executed for what they considered blasphemy and treason. This attempt on his life was thwarted by a plea to remember that King Hezekiah had allowed Micah to speak such words and live and by the intervention of Ahikam, a high government official. This sermon was recorded in full in Jeremiah 7. fn

 

 

(Kent P. Jackson, ed., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 4: 1 Kings to Malachi [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1993], 201.)

 

 

 

 

 

 

-Original Draft-
The Divine Justification for the
Babylonian Destruction of Jerusalem

Bruce Satterfield
Department of Religious Education
Brigham Young University - Idaho

From Glimpses of Lehi's Jerusalem (John W. Welch, David Rolph Seely, Jo Ann H. Seely, ed.s. 
Foundation of Ancient Research and Mormon Studies, Brigham Young Universtity, Provo, Utah, 2004), pp.  561-594.

In January of 588 B.C., Nebuchadnezzar, King of Babylon, laid siege against Jerusalem (see 2 Kings 25; 2 Chron. 36; Jer. 52). For over a year, the Jews suffered the effects of the siege. As famine set in, morale among the Jews sank. Due to their weakened condition, plagues of one kind or another began to afflict the people (Jer. 14:12; 27:8,13). Eventually the food supply was depleted and misery soared high as many were reduced to cannibalism (Jer. 19:9; La. 2:20; 4:10; Ezek. 5:10). Finally, in July of 587 B.C., the Babylonians broke through the walls and began pillaging and looting the city. Many Jews were slaughtered. The city, temple, and walls, were razed to the ground. Those not killed were taken captive to Babylon, except for some of the peasantry. All that was left of Jerusalem was ash and rubble. Sadly, the prophet Jeremiah, who had witnessed the destruction, wrote, "How doth the city sit solitary, that was full of people! how is she become as a widow! she that was great among the nations, and princess among the provinces, how is she become tributary!" (Lamentations 1:1)

Why did God allow such horrible misery and destruction to come upon his chosen people? What purpose did it serve? The answer to these queries is important to understand because many cities as well as civilizations have and will undergo the same fate that Jerusalem experienced in 588-587 B.C. The focus of the present study is to investigate the reason why the Lord allowed Jerusalem's destruction by the Babylonians. To accomplish this, it will be necessary to first review the teachings of past and present prophets regarding the doctrinal basis underlying divine extermination of mortals. Then in the light of doctrine, an examination of the writings of Jeremiah and Ezekiel will give evidence justifying God's destruction of Jerusalem.
 
 

PART ONE:  Agency is Essential to God's Plan

The central principle undergirding the Lord's justification for allowing civilizations like Jerusalem to be destroyed is agency. The principle of agency is an eternal principle essential to all the activities of God regarding His children. Elder Bruce R. McConkie stated, "Agency underlies all things -- all advancement, all progression, even existence itself." (1) Agency is basic to God's plan of salvation, including the creation of the earth, the fall of Adam, the mortal probation of man, and the atonement of Jesus Christ, all designed to make possible the exaltation of God's children. President David O. McKay taught, "Free agency is the impelling source of the soul's progress. It is the purpose of the cord that man become like him. In order for man to achieve this it was necessary for the Creator first to make him free." (2) Likewise, Elder McConkie taught, "Inherent in the whole system of salvation that grows out of the fall of man; inherent in the great and eternal plan that makes of this life a preparatory and a probationary state; inherent in the very atoning sacrifice of God himself -- inherent in the whole eternal plan of salvation is the eternal law of agency. All of the terms and conditions of the Lord's eternal plan operate because man has his agency, and none of it would have efficacy, virtue, or force if there were no agency." (3)

Light of Christ Essential to Agency of Man

Lehi taught that certain conditions must exist before agency can be exercised. First, there must be opposing choices (2 Nephi 2:15). Second, the choices must be enticing. Said he, "Wherefore, the Lord God gave unto man that he should act for himself. Wherefore, man could not act for himself save it should be that he was enticed by the one or the other" (2 Nephi 2:16). Commenting on this, President Harold B. Lee taught, "Father Lehi explained to his son that in order to accomplish that eternal purpose there must be opposition in all things, and that to every individual upon the earth there had to be given the right of free agency and also that there must be in the world the power to entice to do evil and the power to entice to do good." (4)

The Book of Mormon teaches that "the Spirit of Christ,"also known as the light of Christ, the Spirit of God, and the Spirit of the Lord (5), is the agent that entices men and women to do good (Moroni 7:16-17). On the other hand, it is the "the will of the flesh and the evil which is therein, which giveth the spirit of the devil power to captivate" that entices men and women to do evil (2 Nephi 2:29).

"The Spirit giveth light to every man that cometh into the world" (D&C 84:46). This light manifests itself as man's conscience, though this is not the full extent to which the light of Christ may be experienced. (6) According to President Joseph F. Smith, it is by means of this Spirit that "every man is enlightened, the wicked as well as the good, the intelligent and the ignorant, the high and the low, each in accordance with his capacity to receive the light; and this Spirit or influence which emanates from God may be said to constitute man's consciousness." (7) In line with this, Elder McConkie wrote, "By virtue of this endowment all men automatically and intuitively know right from wrong and are encouraged and enticed to do what is right (Moro. 7:16.)." (8) Without the light of Christ there would be no agency. With no enticement for good, man would naturally give way to the enticement for evil. Therefore, the scriptures teach that the light of Christ "strives" to be with man (D&C 1:33; Genesis 6:3; Moses 8:17; 2 Nephi 26:11; Ether 2:15).

The Loss of the Spirit Brings Destruction

However, the scriptures also teach that it is possible to lose the light of Christ. The Lord has repeatedly said, "my Spirit shall not always strive with man" (D&C 1:33; Genesis 6:3; Moses 8:17; 2 Nephi 26:11; Ether 2:15). It follows that when the Spirit is lost there is a loss of agency. In such a condition, man is unable to act for himself, a condition that is unacceptable in the violates the plans of God. When a society as a whole reaches the point that the light of Christ no longer strives with them, then those people are "ripe for destruction." Nephi stated: "For the Spirit of the Lord will not always strive with man. And when the Spirit ceaseth to strive with man then cometh speedy destruction, and this grieveth my soul" (2 Nephi 26:11; emphasis added).

Such was the condition of the people in the days of Noah as well as the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah. Elder Neal A. Maxwell explained God's justification for destroying these peoples: "Being a loving Father, though deeply devoted to our free agency, there are times in human history when He simply could not continue to send spirits to this earth who would have had virtually no chance. This was the case with Sodom and Gomorrah and the cities of the plains." (9) "The children born into these cities had no choice at all left to them. Such was the conformity in wickedness that babes could be born free, but not remain agents unto themselves." (10) Likewise, President John Taylor taught: "Because in forsaking God, they lose sight of their eternal misery on many. And hence the inhabitants of the old world, and of the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed, because it was better for them to die, and thus be deprived of their agency, which they abused, than entail so much misery on their posterity, and bring ruin upon millions of unborn persons." (11)

How the Light of Christ is Lost

Understanding how one loses the light of Christ is pertinent to this study. Men lose the light of Christ when they continually sin against the light. Speaking to the brother of Jared, the Lord said: "I will forgive thee and thy brethren of their sins; but thou shalt not sin any more, for ye shall remember that my Spirit will not always strive with man; wherefore, if ye will sin until ye are fully ripe ye shall be cut off from the presence of the Lord" (Ether 2:15). In addition to continuing in sin, the attitude of the sinner towards sin plays a major role in the loss of the Spirit. President George Albert Smith said: "The spirit of God continues to strive with men everywhere, as long as they make the effort to keep his commandments. When men abandon the truth, refuse to do the right, the Lord of necessity withdraws his spirit and men are left to the buffetings of the adversary." (12)

Those who continually defy the light of Christ and commit sin sear "their conscience as with a hot iron" (JST 1 Timothy 4:2). "All men receive this Spirit," wrote Elder McConkie, "but not all hearken to its voice. Many choose to walk in carnal paths and go contrary to the enticings of the Spirit. It is possible to sear one's conscience to the point that the Spirit will withdraw its influence and men will no longer know or care about anything that is decent and edifying." (13)

Spencer W. Kimball spoke frequently about how people get into a position of rebelliousness that would cause the light of Christ to leave them. "Conscience warns but does not govern. Conscience tells the individual when he is entering forbidden worlds, and it continues to prick until silenced by the will or by sin's repetition." (14) "The will" of the sinner is often manifested in rationalizing or excusing sin. "When people know right from wrong and find themselves in the broad way to destruction, they have two ways to go. They may repent and cleanse themselves and obtain eventual peace and joy, or they may rationalize and excuse themselves and try the "escape" road. Those who follow the latter road sometimes so completely rationalize that they become calloused and lose the desire to repent, until the Spirit of God ceases to strive with them." (15) Such rationalization is due to an individual's unresponsiveness to the things of God. "When the Lord said, 'My spirit shall not always strive with man . . .' this was not because the Spirit is unwilling to strive but because he is made so unwelcome. He is willing to come to the rescue of anyone who really wants to be helped, who will yield to assistance. But when a person pushes the Spirit away and ignores and puts out the 'unwelcome sign,' eventually the Spirit of the Lord ceases to strive. He does not move away from the individual; it is the person who moves away from the Lord." (16)

As one continues to rationalize sin, it becomes nearly impossible to repent. President Kimball wrote, "A man may rationalize and excuse himself till the groove is so deep he cannot get out without great difficulty. . . And if the yielding person continues to give way he may finally reach the point of 'no return.' The Spirit will 'not always strive with man.'(D&C 1:33.)" (17) This is the most damnable aspect of continuing in sin. "Free agency," declared President Marion G. Romney, "possessed by any one person is increased or diminished by the use to which he puts it. Every wrong decision one makes restricts the area in which he can thereafter exercise his agency. The further one goes in the making of wrong decisions in the exercise of free agency, the more difficult it is for him to recover the lost ground. One can, by persisting long enough, reach the point of no return. He then becomes an abject slave. By the exercise of his free agency, he has decreased the area in which he can act, almost to the vanishing point." (18)

The scriptures refer to those who, through seared consciences, have reached this point as "past feeling" (Ephesians 4:19; 1 Nephi 17:45; Moroni 9:20). President Kimball said: "If one has lost that spirit of peace and acceptance, then every effort should be made to recapture it and retain it before he reaches the situation of the brothers of Nephi, to whom Nephi said: 'Ye . . . have heard his voice from time to time . . . but ye were past feeling, that ye could not feel his words.' (1 Nephi 17:45.) When we move away from the Lord there seems to grow upon us a film of worldliness, which insulates us from his influence." (19) This is a dangerous position to be in for the sinner is no longer aware that he is a sinning. Elder Maxwell noted, "The more coarse and crude people become, the less they are aware of it. . . A predator does not know he is a predator, for he is 'past feeling.'" (20)

Like Laman and Lemuel, those who will not feel the warning voice of their own conscience will likewise not listen to the warning voice of God's prophets who are sent to stall their downward fall. Being "past feeling" that they cannot "'feel' the words of God or his prophets." (21) Indeed, rejecting the Lord's prophets is an indicator that the light of Christ is nearly gone out or has ceased altogether within a person or society. Nephi observed of the Jews in his day, "For behold, the Spirit of the Lord ceaseth soon to strive with them; for behold, they have rejected the prophets" (1 Nephi 7:14). Destruction follows those who fail to listen to their own conscience or the Lord's prophets. The Lord has said, "the day cometh that they who will not hear the voice of the Lord [i.e., light of Christ], neither the voice of his servants, neither give heed to the words of the prophets and apostles, shall be cut off from among the people" (D&C 1:14).
 

From the foregoing, the following list characterizes those who are in jeopardy of losing or who have lost the light of Christ:

  • In a state of rebellion, refusing to do what is right
  • Sin is continually repeated
  • Sin is rationalized or excused
  • Repetition of sin cuts a deep grove making it difficult for the sinner to "get out" of sin, i.e., repent
  • Conscience is seared; the sinner is "past feeling" or calloused; no longer aware of sinning
  • No desire to repent of sin
  • Will not follow the Lord's prophets


PART TWO:  The Witness of Jeremiah and Ezekiel

The writings of Jeremiah and Ezekiel witness that the inhabitants of Jerusalem were "ripe for destruction." Examining their writings will reveal that the Jews exhibited all the characteristics of those who have lost the light of Christ. With the spirit lost, their was no enticement for good. Children born to them were without agency; they had no choice but to do evil. Therefore, for the sake of the people of Jerusalem and their children, born and unborn, the Lord had no option but to bring about their destruction.

The Witness of Jeremiah

The century before the prophet Jeremiah began his ministry saw two major religious reforms instituted by the kings of Judah involving the removal of "high places"of worship (whether to Jehovah or pagan deities), the eradication of both foreign and domestic idol worship, a refurbishing of the temple built by Solomon, and a reemphasis of the observance of the Mosaic code. The first was initiated by Hezekiah (ca.715-687 B.C.) as recorded in 2 Kings 18 and 2 Chronicles 29-31. However, Hezekiah's son, Manasseh (ca. 687-642 B.C) reversed his fathers reform policies (see 2 Kings 31; 2 Chronicles 33). This had the effect of causing "Judah and the inhabitants of Jerusalem to err, and to do worse than the heathen, whom the LORD had destroyed before the children of Israel" (2 Chronicles 33:9). Some years after Manasseh's death, his grandson, Josiah (ca. 642-609 B.C.), initiated a second reform (see 2 Kings 22-23; 2 Chronicles 34-35).

Despite Josiah's reforms, the reversal of Hezekiah's reforms by Manasseh proved disastrous for Judah. As evidenced by the Lord's intervention against the Assyrians (2 Chron. 32), Hezekiah's people found themselves in the Lord's good graces after they had eradicated idolatry and refocused their attention towards the law of Moses. But with Manasseh's reversal of his father's religious reforms, Judah's former sins returned. This placed the Jews in a spiritually dangerous position. The Lord has said, "go your ways and sin no more; but unto that soul who sinneth shall the former sins return" (D&C 82:7). With the return of sins comes a return of punishments. Even worse, a greater darkness envelopes the sinner than experienced before his repentance. Mormon observed, "after a people have been once enlightened by the Spirit of God, and have had great knowledge of things pertaining to righteousness, and then have fallen away into sin and transgression, they become more hardened, and thus their state becomes worse than though they had never known these things" (Alma 24:30). Consequently, Josiah's reforms were not able to dislodge the sinful nature of the people of Judah. (22) The reformation made by Josiah's people was outward only, no inward transformation had taken place.

The Light of Christ Diminishes Among the Jews

Living in the aftermath of Josiah's reform, Jeremiah witnessed the sinful nature and rebellious heart of Judah. He could see that unless true reform was made, Judah would fall prey to the wrath of Jehovah and would be destroyed. The Lord called Jeremiah to warn the Jews of their eventual destruction if they did not repent. His call came about a year after King Josiah began his reform (compare 2 Chron. 34:3 and Jer.1:2). (23) In an early prophecy uttered "in the ears of Jerusalem" (Jer. 2:1 - 4:4), Jeremiah levied several charges against the people. This prophecy reveals that the Jews were exhibiting many of the characteristics of those losing the light of Christ. In 2:20-22, Jeremiah stated that early in Israel's history, all Israel broke the yoke (covenant) they made with Jehovah and said they would not serve God. (24) Israel, including the Jews of Jerusalem, was compared to a harlot "upon every high hill and under every green tree"; a "noble vine . . . turned into the degenerate plant of a strange vine"; and a person who had washed themselves with "much soap" to remove a deep rooted stain but unable to do so. William McKane has noted that these verses "agree in their estimate of the deep-seated character of Israel's sinfulness and express a scepticism about the possibility of reformation. . . Deeply ingrained habits have brought about an inner perversion so fundamental that repentance, a change of heart and new patterns of behaviour, would seem to be ruled out." (25) An apt description of perhaps one of the most damnable characteristics of a people losing the light of Christ.

The metaphor of washing with soap but remaining spiritually unclean was an accurate portrayal of the Jew's response to Josiah's reforms. Through Jeremiah, the Lord said, "Judah hath not turned unto me with her whole heart, but feignedly, saith the LORD" (Jeremiah 3:10). Though outward changes had been made, the inner struggle to return to former practices was too great. Some justified their actions feeling it was impossible to get out of the rut they had made. They exclaimed, "There is no hope: no; for I have loved strangers [i.e., foreign religious practices], and after them will I go" (Jeremiah 2:25). Others did not believe that what they were doing was wrong: "Because I am innocent, surely his anger shall turn from me" (Jeremiah 2:35). Generally, the Jews had lost their desire to follow God. "We are lords [Heb. rawd, to wander or roam restlessly]," they said, "we will come no more unto thee?" (Jeremiah 2:31) These statements of justification reflect a lack of conscience showing that the Spirit of the Lord was being ignored. Therefore, Jeremiah ended his prophecy with a call for repentance: "Break up your fallow ground, and sow not among thorns. Circumcise yourselves to the LORD, and take away the foreskins of your heart" (Jeremiah 4:3-4).

More evidence that the people were losing the light of Christ is found in another prophecy pronounced probably towards the end of Josiah's reign. Jeremiah berated the wickedness that had saturated Jerusalem saying, "Run ye to and fro through the streets of Jerusalem, and see now, and know, and seek in the broad places thereof, if ye can find a man, if there be any that executeth judgment, that seeketh the truth; and I will pardon it [i.e., forgive Jerusalem]" (Jeremiah 5:1). Any real attempt to do this would have been futile for "this people hath a revolting [ Heb. sarar, stubborn] and a rebellious heart; they are revolted and gone." (Jer. 5:23). Neither were they conscience-stricken. "Were they ashamed when they had committed abomination?" the Lord asked. "Nay, they were not at all ashamed, neither could they blush" (Jer. 6:15).

Since Josiah's religious reforms had had little effect upon his people, Jeremiah warned that the Lord would "bring a nation upon [them] from far" that would "impoverish [their] fenced cities, wherein [they] trustedst, with the sword." (Jer. 5:15-17). This was a prophecy of the Babylonian siege of 598-597 B.C. (600 B.C. in Book of Mormon chronology), the year before Lehi was called to be a prophet. The siege, however, would not render Jerusalem completely destroyed: "Nevertheless in those days, saith the LORD, I will not make a full end with you" (Jer. 5:18). This would prove two things. First, Jeremiah's prophecies were true. Second, the Lord still loved his people for he would allow them one more opportunity to repent. This chance for repentance reveals that though entrenched in sin, there was still hope for the people of Jerusalem.

The Light of Christ is Almost Extinguished

As Josiah's reign came to an end, the light of Christ was flickering in the winds of sin Yet, the Spirit was still striving with the Jews. But during the reign of Josiah's son, Jehoiakim, who reigned from 609-598 B.C., the light was all but blown out. Under Jehoiakim, Josiah's reform policies came to an end. Immediately, things went from bad to worse.

In the first year of Jehoiakim's reign, Jeremiah stood in the gate of the Temple and speaking in the name of the Lord, he delivered a sermon denouncing the wickedness of the Jews and offering them a chance to repent (Jer. 7; 26). (26) The Jews had come to believe that their pretended reforms were enough to turn away Jehovah's wrath. Therefore, they believed they could continue in sin without consequence. Through Jeremiah, the Lord said: "Will ye steal, murder, and commit adultery, and swear falsely, and burn incense unto Baal, and walk after other gods whom ye know not; And come and stand before me in this house, which is called by my name, and say, We are delivered to do all these abominations?" (Jer. 7:8-10) He then reminded them what happened to the tabernacle at Shiloh in the days of Eli, who's son's, as well as all Israel, continually committed sin. Though sinning against Jehovah, they believed that by carrying the Ark of the Covenant into battle, the Lord would fight in their behalf anyway. Instead, they lost the battle. Additionally, the Ark was captured and the tabernacle was destroyed (see 1 Sam. 3-4). Thus the Lord said, "But go ye now unto my place which was in Shiloh, where I set my name at the first, and see what I did to it for the wickedness of my people Israel" (Jer. 7:12). Yet, for all this, the Jews had not passed the point of no return! The Lord offered hope: "Amend your ways and your doings, and I will cause you to dwell in this place" (Jer. 7:3).

The initial response of the leaders to Jeremiah's denunciation was to have Jeremiah put to death, "for he hath prophesied against this city" (Jer. 26:11). Immediately Jeremiah rebuked them, saying, "amend your ways and your doings, and obey the voice of the Lord your God; and repent, and the Lord will turn away the evil that he hath pronounced against you" (JST Jer. 26:13). This unnerved some of the leaders. "This man is not worthy to die," they said, "for he hath spoken to us in the name of the LORD our God" (Jer. 26:16). This incident demonstrates that early in the reign of Jehoiakim, there still was some respect for God's prophets among the people. There was still hope!

But hope was diminishing. The chronicler tells us that Jehoiakim "did that which was evil in the sight of the LORD his God" (2 Chron. 36:5; also 2 Kings 23:37). The Lord sent prophets, including Jeremiah, warning him to repent. But he refused to hear them. Therefore, Jeremiah said to him: "I have spoken unto you, rising early and speaking; but ye have not hearkened. And the LORD hath sent unto you all his servants the prophets, rising early and sending them; but ye have not hearkened, nor inclined your ear to hear" (Jer. 25:3-4). Refusal to heed the Lord's prophets is a sign that the light of Christ was nearly extinguished in the life of the king.

As the king went, so went the people. They became more stubborn, refusing to follow any of the commands of Jehovah through the prophets. Further, they disregarded the law of Moses, the basis of the covenant made between God and Israel. In response, the Lord told Jeremiah to publically proclaim to the people: "Hear ye the words of this covenant, and do them" (Jer. 11:6). Continuing: "For I earnestly protested unto your fathers in the day that I brought them up out of the land of Egypt, even unto this day, rising early and protesting, saying, Obey my voice. Yet they obeyed not, nor inclined their ear, but walked every one in the imagination of their evil heart" (Jer. 11:7-8). Therefore, the Lord said, the curses specified in the covenant (Deut. 28) would be levied against them. Scriptural history records that these curses often caused Israel to return to the Lord, albeit briefly. In the days of Josiah, the return to the Lord was emphasized through covenant renewal where the people swore they would obey Jehovah (see 2 Kings 23:3). But in the days of Jehoiakim, the covenant was purposefully rejected. Therefore, the Lord said, "A conspiracy is found among the men of Judah, and among the inhabitants of Jerusalem. They are turned back to the iniquities of their forefathers, which refused to hear my words; and they went after other gods to serve them" (Jer. 11:9-10). This apostasy was not limited to the rulers, or the aristocracy, or the priesthood. Rather, it was widespread among all the people of Judah. "For according to the number of thy cities were thy gods, O Judah; and according to the number of the streets of Jerusalem have ye set up altars to that shameful thing, even altars to burn incense unto Baal" (Jer. 11:13).

Jerusalem's Destruction Made Sure

Finally, an incident happened in Jehoiakim's reign that sealed the fate of he and his people. (27) The Lord had Jeremiah write all the prophecies and warnings that had been given him on a scroll. He then wanted the scroll read to all the people. "It may be," the Lord said to Jeremiah, "that the house of Judah will hear all the evil which I purpose to do unto them; that they may return every man from his evil way; that I may forgive their iniquity and their sin" (Jer. 36:1-3). Jeremiah had his scribe, Baruch, go to the temple, where the people had gathered to fast, and read the scroll. (For some reason, Jeremiah had been banned from entering the temple.) But there is no evidence that this had any effect upon the people whatsoever. In fact, the Jewish officials who were present reported the incident to Jehoiakim who demanded to hear what was written on the scroll. As the scroll was being read, Jehoiakim took a penknife and cut each column that had been read and threw it in the fire. This he did "until all the roll was consumed in the fire." "Yet they were not afraid, nor rent their garments, neither the king, nor any of his servants that heard all these words" (Jer. 26:20-24). Jehoiakim then sent a guard to arrest Jeremiah and Baruch "but the LORD hid them." (Jer. 26:26).

This was a telling point! The light of Christ had ceased to exist with Jehoiakim and the other rulers of the Jews. They had become past feeling and calloused. They had no regard for the Lord nor his prophet. As a consequence, the Lord told Jeremiah to say to the king, "He shall have none to sit upon the throne of David: and his dead body shall be cast out in the day to the heat, and in the night to the frost. And I will punish him and his seed and his servants for their iniquity; and I will bring upon them, and upon the inhabitants of Jerusalem, and upon the men of Judah, all the evil that I have pronounced against them; but they hearkened not" (Jer. 36:30-31). Jerusalem's destruction was now sure! Jehovah's "words of judgments against the people were no longer simply scenarios for warning, but rather plans to be carried out: repentance was no longer to be expected, and the people stood under irrevocable judgment." (28)

Jerusalem being doomed by her wickedness, the Lord commanded Jeremiah, "Thou shalt not take thee a wife, neither shalt thou have sons or daughters in this place. For thus saith the LORD concerning the sons and concerning the daughters that are born in this place, and concerning their mothers that bare them, and concerning their fathers that begat them in this land; They shall die of grievous deaths; they shall not be lamented; neither shall they be buried; but they shall be as dung upon the face of the earth: and they shall be consumed by the sword, and by famine; and their carcases shall be meat for the fowls of heaven, and for the beasts of the earth" (Jer. 16:2-4).

Last Chance?

As prophesied, the Babylonians sieged Jerusalem in December, 597 B.C. That same month, Jehoiakim died. His son, Jehoiachin, reigned in his place. However, after three months of siege, Jerusalem surrendered. Many Jews, including Jehoiachin, were taken to Babylon. Jehoiachin's brother, Zedekiah was placed on the throne by Nebuchadnezzar.

During the reign of Zedekiah, the Jews were given one more chance for repentance. Like Mormon, who, knowing that "the day of grace was passed" for his people (Mormon 2:15), continued to preach repentance (Mormon 3:2-3), prophets were sent throughout Jerusalem "prophesying unto the people that they must repent, or the great city Jerusalem must be destroyed" (1 Ne. 1:4). It may seem strange that the Lord offered the Jews another chance for repentance when their fate was already sealed. However, the fate of the whole is not necessarily the destiny of each individual. (29) Though Jerusalem would be destroyed, repentance among individuals was still possible. This was so because the light of Christ was not all together extinguished. Evidence of this is found in the Book of Mormon. Many who had survived the Babylonian siege, such as Lehi, had not rebelled against God but had remained faithful. Even after Lehi and his family fled Jerusalem, the light of Christ still was striving with the people. Speaking of those living in Jerusalem at this time, Nephi said, "the Spirit of the Lord ceaseth soon to strive with them" (1 Nephi 7:14), suggesting that the light of Christ was still there to some degree. And where the light of Christ exists, there is hope.

The offer of repentance was aimed at the spark of divinity within each person. President Joseph F. Smith believed that it was hard to extinguish all that is good in a soul. Said he, "I do not know whether it is possible for any soul to become so debased as to lose all regard for that which is pure and chaste, good and true and godlike. I believe that there still lingers in the heart of the most vicious and wicked, at times at least, a spark of that divinity that has been planted in the souls of all the sons of God." However, he continued, "Men may become so corrupt that they do not have more than mere glimpses of that divine inspiration that strives to lead them toward and to love good." "But," he said, "I do not believe there is a soul in the world that has absolutely lost all conception and admiration of that which is good and pure, when he sees it. It is hard to believe that a human being may become so depraved that he has lost all desire that he might also be good and pure, if it were possible." Yet, he conceded that "many people have abandoned themselves to evil and have come to the conclusion that there is no chance for them." President Smith concluded, "While there is life there is hope, and while there is repentance there is a chance for forgiveness." (30)

But the chance for repentance was refused and hope was vanquished. The people rejected the warnings of the prophets and continued in their wickedness. Therefore, in a letter written during the reign of Zedekiah to the Jews who had been exiled in Babylon after the siege of 597 B.C., Jeremiah wrote the word of the Lord concerning the those who remained in Jerusalem: "Behold, I will send upon them the sword, the famine, and the pestilence, and will make them like vile figs, that cannot be eaten, they are so evil. And I will persecute them with the sword, with the famine, and with the pestilence, and will deliver them to be removed to all the kingdoms of the earth, to be a curse, and an astonishment, and an hissing, and a reproach, among all the nations whither I have driven them: Because they have not hearkened to my words, saith the LORD, which I sent unto them by my servants the prophets" (Jer 29:17-19).

Ezekiel's Witness

About this same time, Jeremiah was shown a vision of two baskets of figs, one full of good figs and the other full of poor figs (Jer. 24). He was told that the basket of poor figs represented Zedekiah and all the Jews who remained in Jerusalem. Again, the Lord promised that because they continued in wickedness, "they [would] be consumed from off the land" (vs. 10). On the other hand, the basket of good figs represented those who had been exiled to Babylon in 597 B.C. It seems that the Lord allowed these Jews to be exiled to protect them from the further wickedness that would bring about Jerusalem's destruction. This he did so that he could prepare a people to return to Jerusalem. Therefore, the Lord promised that he would give the exiled "an heart to know me, that I am the LORD: and they shall be my people, and I will be their God: for they shall return unto me with their whole heart" (vs. 7).

Ezekiel, a priest who had been among those exiled, was called of God to help the Jews undergo the change of heart that would prepare them for their eventual return. He was made "a watchman unto the house of Israel" (31) to warn them of their wicked ways (Ezek. 3:17). A watchman was a guard or sentry who was to call out the safety of the city from the wall or gate (1 Sam. 14:16; 2 Sam. 18:24; 2 Kings 9:17; Jer. 51:12). (32) It was hoped that if Ezekiel warned "the wicked" of the impending consequences of their wickedness, they would "turn from [their] sin, and do that which is lawful and right" (Ezek. 33:14). Ezekiel's writings add a second witness to Jeremiah's testimony of the wickedness of those living in Jerusalem.

Ezekiel began to receive revelations and visions mid-way between the 597 B. C. exile (see Ezek. 1:2) and the final siege and destruction of Jerusalem in 588-587 B.C. His first revelations warned of Jerusalem's impending destruction. In 593 B.C., he dramatized the siege and destruction of Jerusalem through a series of symbolic acts (Ezek. 4-5). Then in word, he made clear that Jerusalem's destruction was sure: "Thus saith the Lord GOD . . . Behold, I, even I, will bring a sword upon you, and I will destroy your high places. And your altars shall be desolate, and your images shall be broken: and I will cast down your slain men before your idols." (Ezek. 6:3-4). The hearts of the people of Jerusalem had turned from serving Jehovah to serving the images of the nations around them. Only through their destruction, would they know that Jehovah was their god. In language similar to that used of the people living in the days of Noah before the flood (see Gen. 6:13) the Lord said of Judah and Jerusalem: "the end is come upon the four corners of the land [of Judah]. . . for the land is full of bloody crimes, and the city [of Jerusalem] is full of violence" (Ezek. 7: 2, 23). The people of Jerusalem had become like the people in the days of Noah and would therefore experience a similar fate.

Ezekiel Witnesses the Apostasy of Jerusalem

In 592 B.C., Ezekiel was taken in vision to Jerusalem where he witnessed the extent to which wickedness had consumed the hearts of the Jews. He also witnessed that their corruption caused the "glory of the Lord," or the light of Christ, to withdraw from the city (Ezek. 8-11 (33)). The vision was given to Ezekiel in the presence of the elders of Judah, whom, after the vision was over, were told all that he Ezekiel seen.

The vision commended with Ezekiel seeing through successive stages "increasingly greater acts of apostasy." (34) At first he was taken to a gate on the northern wall of the city (35), where he saw an altar with "the image of jealousy" (36) (Ezek. 8:3,5). (37) Just as the northern kingdom saw an increase in the number of altars throughout the land before its destruction (Hosea 8:11; 10:1), Ezekiel witnessed the same proliferation among the Jews in Jerusalem. (38) Next, Ezekiel was shown a secret chamber in the wall near a gate leading into the inner court directly surround the temple. (39) Within the chamber he saw men practicing secret rites associated with images of "every form of creeping things, and abominable beasts, and all the idols of the house of Israel, pourtrayed upon the wall round about." In an attempt to justify their actions, the men said: "The Lord seeth us not; the LORD hath forsaken the earth" (Ezek. 8:7-12). Instead of repenting of their actions and pleading that the Lord would return, Jehovah's absence was used as a justification for their worship of pagan deities.

Ezekiel was brought within the northern gate of the inner court immediately surrounding the temple. The inner court and the temple were designed to be the central place of Jehovah worship. But Ezekiel witnessed that Jehovah was no longer honored nor worshiped. Immediately upon his entrance into the inner court, his attention was drawn to the sound of several women sitting near where he stood, who were "weeping for Tammuz" (Ezek. 8:13-14), a Mesopotamian fertility deity, whose annual death and resurrection rites were accompanied by mourners weeping upon his death. (40) After gazing upon this scene, the Lord told Ezekiel to focus his attention on the area between the altar and the porch of the temple, an area of great sanctity. Only the temple itself was more sacred. (41) In this place of holiness, Ezekiel saw twenty-five men "with their backs toward the temple of the LORD, and their faces toward the east; and they worshipped [Heb. shachah, to bow down] (42) the sun toward the east" (Ezek. 8:16). Whether these men were involved in pagan solar worship, such as was found in Egypt or Mesopotamia, or a form a solarized Jehovah worship as some have suggested, (43) what it is clear is that their actions were seen by the Lord as abominable (Ezek. 8:17). It was a deliberate affront to true Jehovah worship. In the area where priests would pray to Jehovah in behalf of Israel (see Joel 2:17), these men were bowing to the sun rising in the east with their backsides directed towards the temple of Jehovah.

Ezekiel was told that these contemptible cultic actions were superceded only by the general social corruption of the people. The Lord said: "Is it a light thing to the house of Judah that they commit the abominations which they commit here [in the temple]? for they have filled the land with violence [Heb. chamas, violence, wrong, injustice] (44), and have returned to provoke me to anger" (Ezek. 8:17). As in Ezekiel 7:23, the language of their social corruptions is reminiscent of the people in the days of Noah. Having literally turned their backs upon the light of Christ, the people had given themselves over to the "will of the flesh and the evil which is therein" (2 Nephi 2:29). Following the desires of the natural man, like those in the days of Noah, "every imagination of the thoughts of [their] heart[s] was only evil continually" (Gen. 6:5; cf. Moses 8:22). Ignoring the light of Christ, the Jews lost their agency. The Lord, therefore, was forced to destroy them for their own good and the good of their children. "Therefore," the Lord told Ezekiel, "will I also deal in fury: mine eye shall not spare, neither will I have pity: and though they cry in mine ears with a loud voice, yet will I not hear them" (Ezek. 8:18).

The Withdrawal of the Light of Christ

As he had seen the wickedness of the Jews in successive degrees, Ezekiel witnessed the withdrawal of the light of Christ is successive stages. While in the inner court, Ezekiel heard the Lord call for the servants whose assignment was to destroy Jerusalem. Six men came from the north (the direction the Babylonian army would come) and stood by the altar, each one holding "a slaughter weapon in his hand" (Ezek. 9:2-3). Added to them was a seventh man "clothed with linen, with a writer's inkhorn by his side" (Ezek. 9:3). Then "the glory of the God of Israel," which had filled the house of the Lord at the time of Solomon's dedication of the temple (1 Kings 8:10-11), and presumably had remained there, moved from the holy of holies to the threshold of the temple. Remember that those who were worshiping in the hidden chamber justified their actions claiming that the Lord had abandoned them (see Ezek. 8:12). But the truth was, the Lord had not abandon them. His glory or light was still there. This is starling in light of the wickedness of the people. But recall what President Kimball taught: "when a person pushes the Spirit away and ignores and puts out the 'unwelcome sign,' eventually the Spirit of the Lord ceases to strive. He does not move away from the individual; it is the person who moves away from the Lord." (45) Ezekiel saw that the spirit of the Lord remained in Jerusalem until after it was destroyed.

The moving of the glory of the Lord to the threshold of the temple was the first stage of the Lord's abandonment of his people. But he would not abandon them to their destruction until all the righteous had been removed. He commanded the man with the writer's inkwell attached to his side to go throughout Jerusalem and place a mark (Heb., taw, the last letter of the Hebrew alphabet written in the old Hebrew script as an X) on the foreheads of everyone who found the abominations of the people shameful (Ezek. 9:4). We are not told whether he found any or not. The other six men were told to follow him and destroy all whom had no mark. When the man with the inkhorn returned from his assignment, he was told to get coals from between the cherubim, which acted as the throne where the glory of the Lord rested, and "scatter them over the city" (Ezek. 10:2). The city would now be destroyed by fire.

As the man did so, the glory of the Lord moved from the threshold to the east gate of the temple (Ezek. 10:18-19). Ezekiel was taken by the Spirit to the same place (Ezek. 11:1) where he witnessed further apostasy of the people of Jerusalem further justifying the Lord's destruction of the city. They had come to believe that because they had not been exiled to Babylon in 597 B.C., no further calamities would come upon them (Ezek. 11:2-3). Their being left behind however was not intended to justify their wicked actions. But rather their wickedness would justify their destruction. Ezekiel was commanded to prophesy against them, saying, "And I will bring you out of the midst thereof, and deliver you into the hands of strangers, and will execute judgments among you. Ye shall fall by the sword . . . And ye shall know that I am the LORD: for ye have not walked in my statutes, neither executed my judgments, but have done after the manners of the heathen that are round about you" (Ezek. 11:9-10, 12).

Ezekiel asked the Lord, "wilt thou make a full end of the remnant of Israel?" (Ezek. 11:13). The answer of the Lord was, No! "Although I have cast them far off among the heathen, and although I have scattered them among the countries, yet will I be to them as a little sanctuary in the countries where they shall come" (Ezek. 8:16). This is a key verse. Though Jerusalem and the temple would be destroyed, the Lord would still be a little sanctuary or temple to Israel. The temple was a symbol of the fulness of the divine presence of God. (46) But though the fulness of God's presence would be lost for a time, the Lord would still be a small sanctuary to Israel in their scattered condition through the ever present light of Christ that fills "the immensity of space-the light which is in all things, which giveth life to all things, which is the law by which all things are governed, even the power of God who sitteth upon his throne" (D&C 88:12-13). If Israel would respond to the light of Christ and come unto the Lord, the Lord would "give them one heart, and I will put a new spirit within you; and I will take the stony heart out of their flesh, and will give them an heart of flesh: That they may walk in my statutes, and keep mine ordinances, and do them: and they shall be my people, and I will be their God" (Ezek. 11:19-20). Ezekiel was later shown that the remnant of Israel who hearken to the light of Christ, would eventually be able to return to Jerusalem with a holy temple wherein the fulness of the glory of the Lord would be found (Ezek. 40-48). Perhaps to symbolize this, the vision ended with the glory of the Lord making a third movement eastward, to the Mt. of Olives (Ezek. 11:22-23). The Mt. of Olives formed Jerusalem's eastern horizon. Babylon, where the exiled Jews were taken, lay to the east of Jerusalem. It may be that the Mt. of Olives represented the location of the exiled Jews. There the Lord rested until the return of Israel.

Conclusion

Somewhere between a year to two years before Jerusalem was destroyed by the Babylonians, in the land called Bountiful by Lehi and his family, a heated debate took place between Nephi and his rebellious brothers dealing, in part, with the righteousness of the people of Jerusalem whom they had left behind. The brothers claimed: "we know that the people who were in the land of Jerusalem were a righteous people; for they kept the statutes and judgments of the Lord, and all his commandments, according to the law of Moses; wherefore, we know that they are a righteous people" (1 Ne. 17:22). Nephi countered by reviewing Israel's history showing that "they did harden their hearts from time to time." "And now," he declared, "after all these things, the time has come that they have become wicked, yea, nearly unto ripeness; and I know not but they are at this day about to be destroyed; for I know that the day must surely come that they must be destroyed, save a few only, who shall be led away into captivity" (1 Ne. 17:43).

The writings of Jeremiah and Ezekiel bear out Nephi's assertion. We have seen that the light of Christ strove with the people of Jerusalem enticing them to repent of their wicked actions and make reformations in their religious practices in the days of Hezekiah and Josiah. But we also have seen that the changes made by the people were outward only. Inwardly, the draw to sin and idolatry was stronger than their will to follow the Lord. In this condition, the people became rebellious, delighting in that which was evil. Their apostasy included a rejection of the Lord's warnings through his prophets. They justified their sinful actions by claiming that what they were doing was not wrong. Some suggested that Jehovah had abandoned them and therefore did not know what they were doing. In the end, they completely rejected Jehovah worship for the pagan deities.

Their utter rejection of Jehovah left them without the influence of the light of Christ. Though, as Ezekiel saw, the light of Christ remained until Jerusalem was destroyed, it no longer strove with the people. Their was no enticement for good. Sin prevailed in the hearts of all the people. In this condition, the Jews became ripe for destruction.
 
 

Notes



1. Bruce R. McConkie, A New Witness for the Articles of Faith (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1985), p.90.

2. David O. McKay, Gospel Ideals, Compiled by G. Homer Durham (Salt Lake City: The Improvement Era, 1953), p.299; also Conference Report, April 1950, pp. 32-33.

3. McConkie, A New Witness for the Articles of Faith, p.89; emphasis added.

4. Harold B. Lee, Conference Report, October 1945, p.46; emphasis added.

5. See Joseph F. Smith, Gospel Doctrine, Compiled by John A. Widstoe (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1919.), p.60-61; Harold B. Lee, Stand Ye In Holy Places: Selected Sermons and Writings of President Harold B. Lee (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1975), p.115; Joseph Fielding Smith Jr., Doctrines of Salvation: Sermons and Writings of Joseph Fielding Smith. 3 vols. Edited by Bruce R. McConkie (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1954-1956), 1:50-51; McConkie, A New Witness for the Articles of Faith, p.257.

6. See Marion G. Romney, "The Light of Christ," Ensign (May 1977), pp. 43-45. For other descriptions on the light of Christ, see Smith, Doctrines of Salvation, 1:49-54; McConkie, A New Witness for the Articles of Faith, p.257-258; Parley P. Pratt, Key to the Science of Theology 10th ed. (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1948), pp.38-42; and B.H. Roberts, The Seventy's Course in Theology, Fifth Year. Divine Immanence and the Holy Ghost (Salt Lake City: Deseret News, 1912), pp.1-10.

7. Smith, Gospel Doctrine, p.61.

8. Bruce R. McConkie, Mormon Doctrine 2nd ed., rev. (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1966), p.156; emphasis added.

9. Neal A. Maxwell, Sermons Not Spoken (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1985), p.91.

10. Neal A. Maxwell, Look Back at Sodom: A Timely Account from Imaginary Sodom Scrolls (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1975), p.13.

11. John Taylor, The Government of God (Orem, Utah: Grandin Book, 1992), pp.52-53. 

12. George Albert Smith, Sharing the Gospel With Others (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1948), p.29; also, Conference Report, Oct. 1916, p.48; emphasis added

13. McConkie, A New Witness for the Articles of Faith, p.260.

14. Spencer W. Kimball, The Teachings of Spencer W. Kimball. Compiled by Edward L. Kimball (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1982), p.162; emphasis added.

15. Kimball, The Teachings of Spencer W. Kimball, p.82; emphasis added. President Kimball often mentioned this point. For example, he stated,"the Spirit of God ceases to strive with the man who excuses himself in wrong-doing" (The Teachings of Spencer W. Kimball, p.86; emphasis added.). Again, "Self-justification is the enemy of repentance. God's Spirit continues with the honest in heart to strengthen, to help, and to save, but invariably the Spirit of God ceases to strive with the man who excuses himself in his wrong doing." (Faith Precedes the Miracle [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1972], p.234; emphasis added).

16. Kimball, The Teachings of Spencer W. Kimball, p.162; emphasis added.

17. Spencer W. Kimball, The Miracle of Forgiveness (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1969), p.86.

18. Marion G. Romney, "The Perfect Law of Liberty," Ensign (Nov 1981), p. 45.

19. Kimball, Faith Precedes the Miracle, p.209.

20. Neal A. Maxwell, Wherefore Ye Must Press Forward (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1977), p.15.

21. Neal A. Maxwell, For the Power is in Them: Mormon Musings (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1970), p.43.

22. This is why the writer of 2 Kings informs the reader that in spite of Josiah's religious reforms, "the LORD turned not from the fierceness of his great wrath, wherewith his anger was kindled against Judah, because of all the provocations that Manasseh had provoked him withal. And the LORD said, I will remove Judah also out of my sight, as I have removed Israel, and will cast off this city Jerusalem which I have chosen, and the house of which I said, My name shall be there" (2 Kings 23:26-27).

23. I am following the generally accepted chronology of the life of Jeremiah. It should be noted that William Holladay has made a compelling argument for a different chronology. See his work in the Hermeneia Series, Jeremiah 2: A Commentary on the Book of the Prophet Jeremiah (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1989), pp. 24-35.

24. The phrase translated in the KJV, "I will not transgress," should be rendered, "I will not serve." The Hebrew word avad, translated "transgress", means "to work or serve".

25. William McKane, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on Jeremiah (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1986), p. 43.

26. It is assumed by most scholars that Jeremiah chapters 7 and 26 are about the same event.

27. There is some debate as to the exact date of this incident. Jer. 36:1 places this in the fourth year of Jehoiakim's reign (604 B.C.). However, the Septuagint (43:9) places it in the eighth year (601 B.C.). William Holladay argues convincingly for the later date. See Jeremiah 1: A Commentary on the Book of the Prophet Jeremiah (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1986), pp. 4-5).

28. Holladay, Jeremiah 1: A Commentary on the Book of the Prophet Jeremiah, p. 5.

29. The concept that the whole does not necessarily reflect each individual is seen in the D&C where the Lord speaks of being pleased with the Church, "speaking unto the church collectively and not individually." (1:30)

30. Smith, Gospel Doctrine, pp.27-28.

31. Though Ezekiel's message was generally to the house of Israel, his immediate assignment was specifically to warn "them of the captivity, unto the children of thy people, and speak unto them" (Ezek. 3:11).

32. C.U. Wolf, "Watchman," in The Interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible, 4 Vols. (Nashville, Tenn.: Abingdon, 1962), 4:806.

33. Scholarship is divided as to whether Ezekiel 11 is a continuation of the vision found in Ezekiel 8-10 or a separate vision. For example, Zimmerli sees no reason for this being "an originally independent vision" (Ezekiel 1, p 257) while Keith W. Carley views this a "separate vision" (The Book of the Prophet Ezekiel [Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974], p. 66). It is admitted that there are problems with the present placement of the scene portrayed in Ezekiel 11 (it would logically fit better before Jerusalem's destruction). However, Daniel Block has noted: "The editor of Ezekiel's prophecies evidently intended 8:1-11:25 to be treated as a single composition. The boundaries of this literary unit are set by a formal introduction (8:1-4) and a corresponding conclusion (11:22-25)" (The Book of Ezekiel; Chapters 1-24 [Eerdmans: Grand Rapids, Mich, 1997], p. 272). In this paper, Ezekiel 11 will be considered as a continuation of the vision since the content continues thematically with Ezekiel 8-10.

34. Carely, The Book of the Prophet Ezekiel, p. 51.

35. The Hebrew text of Ezekiel 8:3,5 is difficult lending itself to various possible translations. The text however seems to suggest that the altar and image of jealousy were located next to the norther city gate which would have been north of the northern gate of the inner court where Ezekiel was first set down. Among those who hold this view, see S. Fish, Ezekiel (London: Soncino, 1985), p. 42; Carely, The Book of the Prophet Ezekiel, p. 52; Walther Zimmerli, Ezekiel 1 (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1979), p. 238. But others (such as Daniel I. Block, The Book of Ezekiel Chapters 1-24 [Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1997], p. 280) see this gate as the northern gate of the inner court.

36. Many have suggested that the image was the Canaanite fertility goddess, Asherah (see Carley, The Book of the Prophet Ezekiel, p. 53; Moshe Greenberg, Ezekiel 1-20 [Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1983], p. 168; Fisch, Ezekiel, p. 42). But Zimmerlie does not think so (Ezekiel 1, pp. 238-239).

37. High places with images of pagan deities were often placed near the gates of cities (see 2 Kings 23:8) as can be seen for example, at the Iron Age gates of Tel Dan (see Abraham Biran, "Dan," in The New Encyclopedia of Archaeological Excavations in the Holy Land, 4 Vols. Ephraim Stern, ed [New York: Simon & Schuster, 1993], 1:323-332; also Avraham Biran, "Sacred Spaces of Standing Stones, High Places and Cult Objects at Tel Dan," Biblical Archaeology Review, Sep/Oct 1998 [Vol. 24 No. 5], pp. 38-45, 70) and Bethsaida (et-Tel) (see Rami Arav, et al., "Bethsaida Rediscovered," Biblical Archaeology Review, Jan/Feb 2000 [Vol. 26 No. 1], pp. 45-56).

38. This corroborates Jeremiah's testimony wherein he said, "according to the number of the streets of Jerusalem have ye set up altars to that shameful thing" (Jer. 11:13).

39. For an excellent discussion of the layout of Solomon's temple including surrounding courts, see Victor V. Hurowitz, "Inside Solomon's Temple," Bible Review (April 1994), pp. 24-37, 50. For other discussions, see Roland de Vaux, Ancient Israel: Vol. 2 Religious Institutions (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1961), pp. 312-322; Menahem Haran, Temples and Temple Service in Ancient Israel (Winona Lake, Indiana: Eisenbrauns, 1985) pp. 189-194. Also helpful is Leslie C. Allen's discussion of Ezekiel's movements within the temple complex, including diagram, in Word Biblical Commentary: Ezekiel 1-19 (Dallas, TX: Word Books, 1994), pp. 139-141.

40. There is scholarly debate the as to the exact nature of Tammuz (Dumuzi) worship. See, O.R. Gurney, "Tammuz Reconsidered: Some Recent Developments," Journal of Semitic Studies 7 (1962), pp. 142-160; Thorkild Jacbosen, "Toward the Image of Tammuz," in Toward the Image of Tammuz and Other Essays on Mesopotamian History and Culture, ed. W. L. Moran (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard, 1970), pp. 73-103); Samuel Noah Kramer, The Sacred Marriage Rite (Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press, 1969), pp. 107-133; Edwin M. Yamauchi, "Tammuz and the Bible," Journal of Biblical Literature 84 (1965), pp. 283-290.

41. Later Rabbi's considered the area between the altar and the porch of the temple one of the most sacred areas in the land. The Mishnah describes "ten degrees of holiness" beginning with the land of Israel and ending with the Holy of Holies, with each degree more holy than the next (see Kelim 1:6-9). In this list, only the holy place and the holy of holies within the temple itself were more holy than the space between the altar and the temple. According to the Mishnah, it was in this area that the priests blessed the people after performing the daily offering (see Tamid 7:2). This also was the place where the priests in the days of the Maccabees petitioned the Lord (1 Maccabees 7:36-38).

42. The form shachah is found this verse is mishtachawithem, which is unusual. It appears to be a participle with a second masculine singlular perfect sufformative. Some scholars (such as Zimmerli, Ezekiel 1, pp. 221 and Block, The Book of Ezekiel: Chapters 1-24, p. 296, n. 70) assign this to scribal error feeling the word should be written mishtachawim, the normal rendering of worship. However, the Rabbis traditionally explained this unusual form as a compound of mashchithim (they destroy) and mishtachawim (they worship). They see in the word as it is presently rendered the dual nature of the abomination being acted out before the Lord: the worship of the sun god would bring about the destruction of the temple (see Fisch, Ezekiel, p. 45).

43. Zimmerli, Ezekiel 1, pp. 243-244

44. The primary use of chamas in the Old Testament is in societal contexts: oppression, injustice, and false accusation based upon greed. But chamas can be taken to the point of physical violence and destruction. For a greater understanding of this word, see H. Haag, "Chamas," in Theological Dictionary of the Old Testmanet. Presently 10 vols. Edited By G. Johannes Botterweck and Helmer Ringgren (Grand Rapids, Mich: Eerdmans, 1980), 4: 478-487.

45. Kimball, The Teachings of Spencer W. Kimball, p.162.

46. President Marion G. Romney taught that the light of Christ may be experienced in three phases: first, the light which enlighteneth every man that cometh into the world; second, the gift of the Holy Ghost; and third, is the second comforter obtained through the more sure word of prophecy when one's calling and election is made sure (see "The Light of Christ," Ensign [May 1977], pp. 43-45). In order to obtain the fulness of the light of Christ one must experience all three phases. These three phases are central to temple worship and are represented in modern temples through various stages of the endowment. These three phases can also be seen in the layout of Solomon's temple. The first phase may be represented by the area outside of the temple including both outer and inner courts. The second phase may be represented by the holy place that housed, among other things, the seven branched candelabra. The third phase may be represented by the holy of holies with its ark of the covenant.

 

 

 

Jeremiah 26-30

 

October 19, 2006

 

 

 

26:1-24 In the beginning of the reign of Jehoiakim . . . came this word from the Lord, saying . . . Stand in the court of the Lord's house, and speak unto all the cities of Judah, which come to worship in the Lord's house, all the words that I command thee

 

The first of twenty historical chapters that relate many of the prophet's experiences and the persecution he suffered as he continued his mission, chapter 26 dates to five years before the previous chapter, being "in the beginning of the reign of Jehoiakim," or 609 B.C. Jeremiah delivered this message from the Lord on the temple grounds, so that the worshippers might repent and be saved. If they would not do so, they might know that they would be overcome and the temple itself destroyed, as was the tabernacle at Shiloh in Eli's time (Jer. 26:6a; BD, "Shiloh"). Again false "priests and the prophets" led the people in objecting to the true prophet, and they actually sought his life; the "princes" of Judah listened as Jeremiah stated his message and made his appeal. With astounding insight, they defended him (Jer. 26:10-19a).

 

The king had put one prophet to death for such prophesying (see Jer. 26:20a, on the similar danger to Lehi, another prophet of this same time); however, Ahikam, son of Shaphan the scribe of the days of good King Josiah, successfully defended and saved Jeremiah (Jer. 26:20-23a, 24a).

 

 

(Ellis T. Rasmussen, A Latter-day Saint Commentary on the Old Testament [Salt Lake City: Deseret, 1993], 560.)

 

 

(Jeremiah 26:2-9.)

 

2 Thus saith the LORD; Stand in the court of the LORD's house, and speak unto all the cities of Judah, which come to worship in the LORD's house, all the words that I command thee to speak unto them; diminish not a word:

 

3 If so be they will hearken, and turn every man from his evil way, that I may repent me of the evil, which I purpose to do unto them because of the evil of their doings.

 

4 And thou shalt say unto them, Thus saith the LORD; If ye will not hearken to me, to walk in my law, which I have set before you,

 

5 To hearken to the words of my servants the prophets, whom I sent unto you, both rising up early, and sending them, but ye have not hearkened;

 

6 Then will I make this house like Shiloh, and will make this city a curse to all the nations of the earth.

 

7 So the priests and the prophets and all the people heard Jeremiah speaking these words in the house of the LORD.

 

8 ¶ Now it came to pass, when Jeremiah had made an end of speaking all that the LORD had commanded him to speak unto all the people, that the priests and the prophets and all the people took him, saying, Thou shalt surely die.

 

9 Why hast thou prophesied in the name of the LORD, saying, This house shall be like Shiloh, and this city shall be desolate without an inhabitant? And all the people were gathered against Jeremiah in the house of the LORD.

 

 

This chapter is given in the reign of Jehoiakim.  We have discussed this before along with chapter 7.  He is in the court between the brazen sea and the huge altar of sacrifice.  He was a priest so he was allowed inside. 

 

Verse 3 – The word repent in this verse actually means remorse or relent (scripture footnote).

 

The false prophets wanted to kill Jeremiah for his speech, they say they worship Jehovah without the inner change of heart; they simply go through the motions of observing the law.

 

 

The Yoke of Babylon (Jer. 27-29)

 

Although the heading in Jeremiah 27:1 gives a date in the reign of Jehoiakim (apparently in error), I will discuss the related events in chapters 27 through 29 in the context of the reign of Zedekiah. fn Chapters 27 and 28 record the symbolic act performed by Jeremiah when he wore a yoke around his neck representing the word of the Lord, urging the people to submit to Babylon. The Lord revealed his will on the matter, "And now I have given all these lands into the hand of Nebuchadnezzar the king of Babylon, . . . and it shall come to pass, that the nation and kingdom which will not serve the same Nebuchadnezzar . . . will I punish" (Jer. 27:6-8). But at the same time there were prophets who said, "Ye shall not serve the king of Babylon" (Jer. 27:14). Others said, "Behold, the vessels of the Lord's house shall now shortly be brought again from Babylon" (Jer. 27:16). Hananiah, one of the prophets bearing the latter message, came to Jeremiah and dramatically broke the yoke off his neck, proudly proclaiming that in this same way the yoke of Babylon would soon be removed (Jer. 28:10-11). Of both these kinds of prophets the Lord proclaimed, "They prophesy a lie unto you" (Jer. 27:14, 16; see also 14:13-15).

 

This was truly a test for Judah to see if they could determine the word of God and his will and then have the courage to obey. Whereas the word of the Lord to Isaiah had warned of the danger of an alliance with Syria and Israel or with the Assyrians (Isa. 7-8), the word of the Lord to Jeremiah was to submit. The most reliable way to discern the words of the Lord from the words of men is through the power of the Spirit (D&C 18:34-35; 68:3-4), but another reliable key to prophecy was to be found already in the Law of Moses: "When a prophet speaketh in the name of the Lord, if the thing follow not, nor come to pass, that is the thing which the Lord hath not spoken, but the prophet hath spoken it presumptuously" (Deut. 18:22; see also Jer. 28:9). Jeremiah rebuked Hananiah: "The Lord hath not sent thee; but thou makest this people to trust in a lie. Therefore thus saith the Lord; Behold, I will cast thee from off the face of the earth: this year thou shalt die, because thou hast taught rebellion against the Lord" (Jer. 28:15-16). The following terse note should have demanded the attention of any who had witnessed this dramatic confrontation, even without the power of the Spirit: "So Hananiah the prophet died the same year in the seventh month" (Jer. 28:17).

 

 

(Kent P. Jackson, ed., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 4: 1 Kings to Malachi [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1993], 204.)

 

 

Verses 6-9 – The people had a difficult time distinguishing between the true prophets and the false ones.  Was there a priest craft going on here?

 

In chapter 26 we learn that after this sermon the people, in conjunction with the priests and prophets, took Jeremiah before the rulers of Judah, saying, "Thou shalt surely die" (Jer. 26:8Jer. 26:8-10). They charged him before the rulers as prophesying against the holy city. Jeremiah's defense was simple: "The Lord sent me to prophesy against this house and against this city all the words that ye have heard. Therefore now amend your ways and your doings, and obey the voice of the Lord your God, and repent, and the Lord will turn away the evil that he hath pronounced against you" (JST Jer. 26:12-13). In the ensuing debate "certain of the elders" argued that Jeremiah should be spared, citing the example of Micah, who also had prophesied against the city and had been spared by King Hezekiah. It was probably only the intervention of Ahikam, the son of Shaphan, fn a high court official, that saved Jeremiah's life. The danger of being killed for delivering such a message was real, as evidenced by a note at the end of chapter 26 about an otherwise unknown prophet Urijah of Kirjath-jearim, who, like Jeremiah, prophesied against Jerusalem during the reign of King Jehoiakim. The king sought to put him to death, but he fled to Egypt. The relentless king then had him hunted down, extradited, convicted, and finally killed (Jer. 26:20-23).

(Kent P. Jackson, ed., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 4: 1 Kings to Malachi [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1993], 223 - 224.)

 

 

Jeremiah is pessimistic, he is commanded to teach doom and gloom, the false prophets are optimistic, they seem to believe their own words.

 

The Voice of Warning: Jeremiah, Lehi, and Others

 

Jeremiah had begun his ministry in Jerusalem more than twenty years before the conquests of Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon. fn He was unpopular and was considered treasonous by some factions in the capital because he advocated acquiescence fn—surrender to the Babylonians, submit to exile, and make the most of a new but temporary home: build houses, plant gardens, marry, rear families, even pray for the peace of Babylon! (see Jer. 29:4-7)—all to preserve a remnant that would return to Jerusalem just a few decades later, as prophesied. fn

 

On one occasion Jeremiah stood in the court of the Temple warning that the Lord was going to make his House like Shiloh, and the city of Jerusalem desolate without an inhabitant (see Jer. 26:9Jer. 26:9). fn "All the people were gathered against Jeremiah in the house of the Lord," intending to kill him (just as when Jesus later prophesied the destruction of the next Temple at the same place; the people tried to kill Jesus; see Matt. 24:1-2; John 8:20, 37-59). Certain elders of the people reminded the crowd to be careful what they did with Jeremiah—other prophets had also spoken in the name of the Lord and prophesied the destruction of Jerusalem; for example, Micah of Moresheth-gath in the days of Hezekiah, and a contemporary of Jeremiah, one Urijah of Kiriath-jearim (see Jer. 26:17-20).

 

Yet another prophet was in the city at the time, teaching the same things. Lehi warned of the impending destruction of Jerusalem, and he testified of the people's wickedness and of the coming of a Messiah. "When the Jews heard these things they were angry . . . and they also sought his life" (1 Ne. 1:20). fn

 

The Book of Mormon says, "There came many prophets, prophesying unto the people that they must repent, or the great city Jerusalem must be destroyed" (1 Ne. 1:4). Amos taught that God would do nothing without first revealing it to his prophets (see Amos 3:7). The Lord always gives plenty of warning. The Book of Mormon's "many prophets" is true: Jeremiah, Lehi, Huldah, Zephaniah, Habakkuk, Daniel, Ezekiel, and Urijah were all contemporaries.

 

Lehi's sons Laman and Lemuel did not believe that Jerusalem could be destroyed (see 1 Ne. 2:13). There was no historical precedent for such a bold prophecy: Jerusalem had never been destroyed in all of Israelite history, and in fact, Jerusalem may have been regarded by some as inviolable; for example, at the time of Sennacherib's siege it had been miraculously preserved. fn The prophets, on the other hand, knew that the City's inviolability was based on her spirituality. Judah's God had been patient and long-suffering and had given ample warning and sufficient time to repent. Even

 

 

(David B. Galbraith, D. Kelly Ogden, and Andrew C. Skinner, Jerusalem: The Eternal City [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1996], 104.)

 

 

The story of Nebuchadnezzar

 

Nebuchadnezzar, King of Babylon

 

Emerging as victor at the Battle of Carchemish on the Euphrates, Nebuchadnezzar II (Nabu-kudurri-usur; 605-562 B.C.) solidified his dominions in the Levant. Josiah's son, Jehoahaz, had been made king in Jerusalem after his father's death in 609 B.C., but Pharaoh Nechoh had taken him away to Egypt and put his brother Eliakim on the throne. Eliakim's name was changed to Jehoiakim.

 

Nebuchadnezzar pursued the Assyrian policy of population deportation. There were three major deportations: in 605, 597, and 586 B.C. One might suppose that by the third invasion of Babylon's armies, somebody would have been believing the prophets.

 

In 605-604 B.C. the Babylonian warrior-king exiled some Jews from Jerusalem, including Daniel and his three friends. Jehoiakim reigned for eleven years, until 598-597 B.C., after which Nebuchadnezzar carried him away to Babylon or had him killed. Jehoiakim's son Jehoiachin was allowed to rule as a vassal or puppet king of the Babylonians. His reign lasted only three months, as Nebuchadnezzar summoned him to Babylon along with "ten thousand captives, and all the craftsmen and smiths" (2 Kgs. 24:14), including Ezekiel. fn He also carried away the Temple treasures (2 Kgs. 24:13). Jehoiachin's uncle Mattaniah began to reign, and Mattaniah's name was changed to Zedekiah. The first page of the Book of Mormon dates to the commencement of Zedekiah's reign. fn Lehi and his family fled Jerusalem by way of the wilderness, possibly taking the old desert road southeast to En Gedi and then turning south for another 150 miles to the Red Sea and beyond. fn

 

Zedekiah reigned for eleven years in Jerusalem; in his ninth year the Babylonian armies returned to conduct the two-year siege that culminated in the utter destruction of the city. fn Zedekiah was the last of the royal Davidic dynasty to reign in ancient Jerusalem.

 

And it came to pass in the ninth year of his reign, in the tenth month, in the tenth day of the month, that Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came, he, and all his host, against Jerusalem, and pitched against it; and they built forts against it round about.

 

And the city was besieged unto the eleventh year of king Zedekiah.

 

And on the ninth day of the fourth month the famine prevailed in the city, and there was no bread for the people of the land.

 

And the city was broken up, and all the men of war fled by night by the way of the gate between two walls, which is by the king's garden: (now the Chaldees were against the city round about:) and the king went the way toward the plain.

 

And the army of the Chaldees pursued after the king, and overtook him in the plains of Jericho: and all his army were scattered from him.

 

So they took the king, and brought him up to the king of Babylon to Riblah; and they gave judgment upon him.

 

And they slew the sons of Zedekiah before his eyes, and put out the eyes of Zedekiah, and bound him with fetters of brass, and carried him to Babylon. (2 Kgs. 25:1-7) fn

 

We know from Jeremiah 34:7 that two fortified positions were the last to hold out against the armies of Babylon: "When the king of Babylon's army fought against Jerusalem, and against all the cities of Judah that were left, against Lachish, and against Azekah: for these defenced cities remained of the cities of Judah."

 

Archaeological discoveries corroborate the biblical record of the Babylonian sieges and the destruction of Jerusalem. Three specific discoveries will be mentioned here.

 

The Chronicle of Nebuchadnezzar II is a cuneiform inscription that mentions the siege of "the city of Judah" (Jerusalem) in 598-597 B.C., the displacement of Jehoiachin as king of Judah, and the appointment of Zedekiah to the throne (see 2 Kgs. 24:10-18). fn

 

The Lachish Ostraca were found by J. L. Starkey in the gateway guardroom at Tel ed-Duweir (biblical Lachish) in 1935. They are letters or drafts of letters communicating information between military commanders in Lachish and Jerusalem during the Judeo-Babylonian war before the fall of Jerusalem—written, therefore, about 588 B.C. fn Lachish Letter 4 paints the same woeful picture as Jeremiah. One sentence from the letter reads: "And let [my lord] know that we are watching [over] the signals of Lachish, according to all the indications which my lord hath given, for we cannot see [the signals of] Azekah" fn—meaning that Azekah had fallen to the enemy. Only Lachish was left; then the Babylonians marched on Jerusalem. fn

 

The Babylonian armies camped on the hills overlooking Jerusalem. One principal camp was on the northern end of the Mount of Olives, also called Mount Scopus (which now includes the site of Brigham Young University's Jerusalem Center for Near Eastern Studies). By surrounding the city, the Babylonians blocked efforts to resupply its citizens. The situation became extremely desperate when food storage was used up and starvation set in (see Jer. 37:21; 52:6; 2 Kgs. 25:3). The besieging armies systematically broke down the walls of Jerusalem, and Nebuchadnezzar's captain eventually "burnt the house of the Lord, and the king's house, and all the houses of Jerusalem, and every great man's house burnt he with fire" (2 Kgs. 25:9; see also Jer. 52:13). Babylon thus earned undying opprobrium for having razed the nearly four-centuries-old Temple of God and leaving it in ruins. fn

 

Excavations in the City of David and in today's Jewish Quarter attest to the destruction in the 587-586 B.C. siege of Jerusalem: many arrowheads, a destroyed four-room house, a burnt room, and clay bullae (letter seals or stamps) fn baked hard by a great conflagration that swept over the whole city. The bullae were found in what has come to be known as "the bullae house," which the excavator Yigal Shiloh speculated may have been an official administrative archive. fn Inscribed on the bullae were fifty-one different names of scribes, court officials, and ministers, a high percentage of them with the theophoric suffix -yahu (Jehovah). Most of the names are known from the Bible and other inscriptions. One such name is Gemariah, son of Shaphan, likely the same man mentioned in Jeremiah 36, a sort of secretary of state in the court of Jehoiakim, king of Judah from 609 to 598 B.C. fn Another seal mentions the scribe and friend of the prophet Jeremiah, Berechiah, son of Neriah. Berechiah is the long form of Baruch. This same Baruch ben Neriah served as scribe for Jeremiah and recorded his teachings, including predictions of the downfall of Judah and Jerusalem (see Jer. 36:10-25). fn

 

As late as 1962 the most widely used textbook on biblical archaeology lamented that "from Jerusalem no archaeological evidence of the Babylonian destruction has been recovered." fn The excavations of Kathleen Kenyon and Yigal Shiloh make such a statement no longer true. There is now considerable physical evidence fnof the fulfillment of Lehi's and Jeremiah's prophecies of the destruction of Jerusalem. fn Numerous houses were destroyed in the Babylonian siege of the city. In or near one such four-room house, two Aramaic ostraca were found with the inscribed name Ahiel, possibly the owner of the house. fn Other inscriptions found in excavations in the City of David are of interest in light of the Book of Mormon. Professor Shiloh reported finding three different sherds of local pottery inscribed with South Arabian names in the South Arabian script of ca. 600 B.C. According to Shiloh, "The discovery of such objects, in the Jerusalem of the eve of its destruction, is of particular importance in connection with the cultural ties between Judah and the Red Sea and South Arabia in this period." fn Such finds support the authenticity of the story of Lehi's trek, for he, too, seems to have been acquainted with travel routes between Judah and the Red Sea, and South Arabia is the area to which he led his family, probably following the "Frankincense Trail" along the western edge of the Arabian peninsula. fn

 

Though Babylonians did carry out mass deportations, they did not follow the Assyrians' policy of transpopulation. Jews were forced away from their land, but nobody was brought in to settle it. The few remaining Jews, mostly poor, eked out a bare existence and paid tribute to their conquerors. The administrative center of the Babylonians was about seven miles north of Jerusalem, at Mizpah. Details of the political intrigue that ensued at Mizpah, the murder of the Babylonian governor, the release of Jeremiah from prison, the flight of many Jews to Egypt, and their forcing Jeremiah to accompany them are all recorded in Jeremiah 39 to 44.

 

 

(David B. Galbraith, D. Kelly Ogden, and Andrew C. Skinner, Jerusalem: The Eternal City [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1996], 106.)

 

 

(Jeremiah 27:2-22.)

 

2 Thus saith the LORD to me; Make thee bonds and yokes, and put them upon thy neck,

 

3 And send them to the king of Edom, and to the king of Moab, and to the king of the Ammonites, and to the king of Tyrus, and to the king of Zidon, by the hand of the messengers which come to Jerusalem unto Zedekiah king of Judah;

 

4 And command them to say unto their masters, Thus saith the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel; Thus shall ye say unto your masters;

 

5 I have made the earth, the man and the beast that are upon the ground, by my great power and by my outstretched arm, and have given it unto whom it seemed meet unto me.

 

6 And now have I given all these lands into the hand of Nebuchadnezzar the king of Babylon, my servant; and the beasts of the field have I given him also to serve him.

 

7 And all nations shall serve him, and his son, and his son's son, until the very time of his land come: and then many nations and great kings shall serve themselves of him.

 

8 And it shall come to pass, that the nation and kingdom which will not serve the same Nebuchadnezzar the king of Babylon, and that will not put their neck under the yoke of the king of Babylon, that nation will I punish, saith the LORD, with the sword, and with the famine, and with the pestilence, until I have consumed them by his hand.

 

9 Therefore hearken not ye to your prophets, nor to your diviners, nor to your dreamers, nor to your enchanters, nor to your sorcerers, which speak unto you, saying, Ye shall not serve the king of Babylon:

 

10 For they prophesy a lie unto you, to remove you far from your land; and that I should drive you out, and ye should perish.

 

11 But the nations that bring their neck under the yoke of the king of Babylon, and serve him, those will I let remain still in their own land, saith the LORD; and they shall till it, and dwell therein.

 

12 ¶ I spake also to Zedekiah king of Judah according to all these words, saying, Bring your necks under the yoke of the king of Babylon, and serve him and his people, and live.

 

13 Why will ye die, thou and thy people, by the sword, by the famine, and by the pestilence, as the LORD hath spoken against the nation that will not serve the king of Babylon?

 

14 Therefore hearken not unto the words of the prophets that speak unto you, saying, Ye shall not serve the king of Babylon: for they prophesy a lie unto you.

 

15 For I have not sent them, saith the LORD, yet they prophesy a lie in my name; that I might drive you out, and that ye might perish, ye, and the prophets that prophesy unto you.

 

16 Also I spake to the priests and to all this people, saying, Thus saith the LORD; Hearken not to the words of your prophets that prophesy unto you, saying, Behold, the vessels of the LORD's house shall now shortly be brought again from Babylon: for they prophesy a lie unto you.

 

17 Hearken not unto them; serve the king of Babylon, and live: wherefore should this city be laid waste?

 

18 But if they be prophets, and if the word of the LORD be with them, let them now make intercession to the LORD of hosts, that the vessels which are left in the house of the LORD, and in the house of the king of Judah, and at Jerusalem, go not to Babylon.

 

19 ¶ For thus saith the LORD of hosts concerning the pillars, and concerning the sea, and concerning the bases, and concerning the residue of the vessels that remain in this city,

 

20 Which Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon took not, when he carried away captive Jeconiah the son of Jehoiakim king of Judah from Jerusalem to Babylon, and all the nobles of Judah and Jerusalem;

 

21 Yea, thus saith the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel, concerning the vessels that remain in the house of the LORD, and in the house of the king of Judah and of Jerusalem;

 

22 They shall be carried to Babylon, and there shall they be until the day that I visit them, saith the LORD; then will I bring them up, and restore them to this place.

 

 

This message isn’t new, Lehi was saying the same thing, (1 Nephi 1), that’s why the priests and elders wanted them dead.

 

 

Lehi & Jeremiah: Prophets Priests & Patriarchs

David Rolph, JoAnn H. Seely
Provo, Utah: Maxwell Institute, 1999. Pp. 24–35

Lehi and Jeremiah: Prophets, Priests, and Patriarchs

David Rolph and Jo Ann H. Seely

 

"For it came to pass in the commencement of the first year of the reign of Zedekiah, king of Judah, . . . there came many prophets, prophesying unto the people that they must repent, or the great city Jerusalem must be destroyed" (1 Nephi 1:4). Thus Nephi begins his record with the call of his father Lehi to become a prophet and to join the other prophets in Jerusalem prophesying the imminent destruction of Jerusalem.1 Jeremiah was one of these prophets. Lehi in his brief ministry in Jerusalem2 would deliver the same message that Jeremiah had delivered for almost thirty years before Lehi's call, and he would suffer the same rejection and persecution. Their respective lives and records, preserved in the Book of Mormon and the Bible, richly complement each other. Lehi and Jeremiah are first and foremost prophets. They lived and ministered to their people in a pivotal time in the history of Israel. Their records are timely in that they illustrate the perils of the period that led to the disaster of Babylonian conquest and exile for Israel and the departure of Lehi's family for the promised land. At the same time their messages are timeless. Lehi and Jeremiah testified of Christ through their deeds and through their words, and both looked forward to the restoration.

Lehi and Jeremiah are an interesting study in contrast. Both were prophets, but Lehi was called to leave Jerusalem and deliver his family from destruction, while Jeremiah was called to stay and witness the destruction and exile of his people. Both were priests—Lehi after the order of Melchizedek and Jeremiah a member of a distinguished Aaronid family. Both were patriarchs—Lehi of a family that would become a people divided among themselves for centuries and Jeremiah of a people who were already divided, taken into exile where they would face the challenge of maintaining their identity.

A brief review of their background and mission may foster a greater appreciation for these prophets and help illuminate the message they proclaimed. We can learn from the book of Jeremiah what it was like to live in Jerusalem at the time of Lehi, and we get a sober view of what would have happened to Lehi and his family had they not been warned by the Lord to flee.

Lehi was a wealthy family man who was well educated, as evidenced by the instruction he gave his children (see 1 Nephi 1:1–2). Because Lehi was familiar with the language of the Egyptians and with desert life, many have suggested he was a merchant.3 He was married to Sariah, and they had four sons and an unspecified number of daughters. Two more sons were born in the wilderness as they traveled. Jeremiah, on the other hand, was a priest and was commanded not to marry or have children because the deplorable situation in Jerusalem would only result in the deaths of those children. Although Lehi found many challenges in his own family, Jeremiah would face a terrible loneliness in his prophetic calling (see Jeremiah 16:1–4).

Both men came to their people prophesying the destruction of Jerusalem because the people had broken the covenant, and both would contribute to an understanding of the covenant tradition in the future. Lehi and his family would inherit a new promised land in the Americas, given by covenant (see 2 Nephi 1:9); Jeremiah would look to the future when the Lord would give to his children "a new covenant" (Jeremiah 31:31–33).

The lives of these two men are symbolic of different aspects of Israel's relationship with the Lord. Jeremiah's life was a symbol of the justice of God and the impending destruction of Jerusalem. He was commanded not to marry and not to have children, lest they die grievous deaths (see Jeremiah 16:1–4), and he was commanded not to mourn for the people because the Lord had taken away his "lovingkindness and mercies" (Jeremiah 16:5–7). Neither was he allowed to participate in the house of feasting and joy because the day was upon Judah when gladness would cease (see Jeremiah 16:8–9). And yet Jeremiah experienced the mercies of the Lord as his life and that of his scribe Baruch were spared. Jeremiah sought solace and comfort in his relationship with the Lord and prophesied the return and restoration of his people (see Jeremiah 30–31).

Lehi's life illustrated the "tender mercies of the Lord" (1 Nephi 1:20; 2 Nephi 1:2). He was commanded to deliver his family from destruction, to leave Jerusalem, and to inherit another promised land. His family was chosen to be a remnant of the house of Israel that would be preserved from destruction (see 2 Nephi 3:5). And yet Lehi underwent severe trials in the wilderness and experienced the justice of God as he witnessed the apostasy of his sons and looked into the future and saw the terrible destructions of his people. Both prophets rejoiced in their visions of the coming of the Messiah. Jeremiah saw him in terms of justice: he "shall execute judgment and justice in the earth" (Jeremiah 23:5). Lehi saw him coming in mercy and justice (see 2 Nephi 2:8, 12).

Jeremiah, in his ministry, longed to flee into the wilderness: "Oh that I had in the wilderness a lodging place of wayfaring men; that I might leave my people, and go from them! for they be all adulterers, an assembly of treacherous men" (Jeremiah 9:2). On one occasion in his tent in the wilderness, Lehi began to murmur against the Lord because of his afflictions (see 1 Nephi 16:20), and his family forever remembered Jerusalem with nostalgia.4

Historical Setting

Jeremiah and Lehi were both descendants of Israel. Jeremiah was from the tribe of Levi through Aaron (see Jeremiah 1:1) and was descended from the priestly family of Abiathar. Abiathar, one of the two high priests that served under David, had supported the rebellion of David's son Adonijah; consequently, Solomon exiled Abiathar to the little town of Anathoth, two and a half miles to the northeast of Jerusalem (see 1 Kings 2:26–27). Centuries later Jeremiah was born and lived in Anathoth but spent much of his ministry in Jerusalem.

Lehi descended from the tribe of Joseph through Manasseh (see Alma 10:3), which had been assigned territory in the north when Israel entered the promised land. Nephi tells us that Lehi had lived his entire life at Jerusalem until he was called by the Lord to flee into the wilderness (see 1 Nephi 1:4). We do not know when or under what circumstances Lehi's ancestors left the land of their inheritance in Manasseh and moved to Jerusalem, but several times in the Old Testament mention is made of members of different tribes residing in Jerusalem. At the time of Asa (898 BC; see 2 Chronicles 15:9) and later during the days of Hezekiah (715–687 BC; see 2 Chronicles 30:25), there is mention of descendants of Manasseh in Jerusalem. Perhaps they had moved there to participate in the religious reforms of these two kings, or perhaps the latter group had fled from the destruction of the Northern Kingdom in 722 BC Archaeological evidence suggests that Jerusalem grew dramatically during the reign of Hezekiah, probably because of the influx of refugees from the north. This growth in population was accommodated with the construction of two new residential and commercial quarters in Jerusalem called the Mishneh (where Huldah resided; see 2 Kings 22:14) and Makhtesh (see Zephaniah 1:10).5

David established the capital of the united kingdom in Jerusalem around 1000 BC, and his son Solomon built the temple there. In 922 BC, at the beginning of the reign of Solomon's son Rehoboam, the kingdoms divided between the ten northern tribes and the two southern tribes. In 722 BC the Northern Kingdom of Israel was destroyed and the ten tribes were taken into captivity by Assyria. Although many cities in the Southern Kingdom were destroyed by the Assyrians in 701 BC (see 2 Kings 18:13), Jerusalem was miraculously preserved because the people repented under the direction of the prophet Isaiah and the righteous king Hezekiah (715–687 BC; see 2 Kings 18–19; Isaiah 36–37). Hezekiah was followed by Manasseh, known in 2 Kings as the most wicked of all the kings of Judah. He established idolatrous worship throughout the land, even in the temple, and shed much innocent blood (see 2 Kings 21). We do not know exactly the dates of the births of Jeremiah or Lehi, but it is very likely that they were born either during or immediately after the reign of the wicked king Manasseh (687–642 BC) and that they were very close to the same age. Jeremiah was called to be a prophet as a young man in 627 BC (see Jeremiah 1:6).6 Lehi was called to be a prophet in 597 BC, already a man with grown sons and daughters.

Jeremiah and Lehi lived their early years in the reign of King Josiah, known as one of the most righteous of Judah's kings. He came to the throne at a young age and was instrumental in cleansing the temple and reestablishing the covenant. Both Lehi and Jeremiah must have been encouraged by the repentance of the people. As the Assyrian Empire was beginning to weaken, there were great hopes of nationalism, but Josiah was tragically killed at Megiddo in 609 BC, after which two decades of tumult began. Josiah was replaced by Jehoahaz, who was shortly taken into exile to Egypt and replaced by his brother Jehoiakim (609–587 BC). At the Battle of Carchemish in 605 BC, Babylon decisively defeated Assyria. Jehoiakim rebelled against Babylon, leading in 598 BC to an exile of selected Jews to Babylon. He was replaced by his son Jehoiachin, who was promptly exiled to Babylon after ruling only three months. The Babylonians next put Zedekiah, a son of Josiah, on the throne. All of these events combined to shape the world of Jeremiah and Lehi in which the beginning of the Book of Mormon takes place.

The Jerusalem of their time was a city of about 125 acres and a population of between 25,000–30,000 people.7 It had expanded beyond the original Jebusite city that David conquered to include the temple and its surroundings built by Solomon, the citadel with the palaces, as well as the quarters called the Mishneh and Makhtesh. The city walls had been expanded and repaired by Uzziah, Hezekiah, and Manasseh to encompass much of the hill to the west of the city. Jeremiah, who lived in a village outside of Jerusalem, spent much of his time in and around the temple precincts because of his duties as prophet and priest. Lehi may have lived in one of the new quarters of Jerusalem or even outside the city.8

Lehi and his family certainly knew of the prophet Jeremiah. Some of his prophecies up to the time of Zedekiah had already been copied onto the brass plates (see 1 Nephi 5:13). Furthermore Nephi made note of Jeremiah's incarceration (see 1 Nephi 7:14). These observations raise an important question of whether Lehi and his family departed early in the reign of King Zedekiah, perhaps within the first year of his reign (597–596 BC), or whether the party left Jerusalem just before the final Babylonian siege some ten years later. Randall Spackman has brought forward reasons for the later dating that are based largely on Nephi's reference to the imprisonment of Jeremiah (see 1 Nephi 7:14) and the fact that, according to Jeremiah's book, he went to prison in the tenth year of Zedekiah's rule, only months before the Babylonians captured the city (see Jeremiah 32:1–2; 37:15–16, 21; 38:6–13, 28).9 The book of Jeremiah is silent about Jeremiah's activities during the first year of Zedekiah's reign. If Jeremiah was imprisoned at that time, as suggested by the Book of Mormon (see 1 Nephi 7:14), we would not expect to find a reference to this imprisonment in the Bible. But two passages in Jeremiah's book may refer to earlier imprisonments. In 605 BC, Jeremiah declared "I am shut up," referring to the fact that he was restricted from going into the temple area (Jeremiah 36:5). The Hebrew word he used (‘atsur) is ambiguous. It can mean "imprisoned" or "in custody." In fact, it is the word in Jeremiah 33:1 that refers to his imprisonment. Later, in 601 BC, Jeremiah was punished by being put in "the stocks" (Jeremiah 20:1–6). The Hebrew word used here is also not clear; some translations take it as meaning "imprisoned." Hence, Jeremiah's celebrated imprisonment just before the city fell to the Babylonians in 587 BC was not the only instance in which the prophet had been officially restrained.10

Lehi and Jeremiah may have known each other, and it may well have been through the priesthood that they shared association. We may assume that those commissioned by the Lord to prophesy in Jerusalem were acquainted with each other. Orders of the prophets known as the "sons of the prophets" were known in ancient Israel from the time of Saul and Samuel (see 1 Samuel 10:5; 19:20) and at the time of Elijah (see 1 Kings 18:4) and Elisha (see 2 Kings 2:3; 3:11; 4:1, 38; 6:1–2). (False prophets were also apparently organized [see 1 Kings 22:6; 2 Kings 23:2; Jeremiah 26: 7–8].) It is possible that a group of legitimate prophets also existed in Jerusalem shortly before the exile. Joseph Smith taught that all of the prophets, presumably including Jeremiah, had the Melchizedek Priesthood.11 Lehi and his family certainly had the Melchizedek Priesthood, as evidenced by Alma 13, which describes the Nephite priesthood as Melchizedek. It is likely that Lehi and Jeremiah were part of a Melchizedek Priesthood community in Jerusalem, and it is not unlikely that one even received his priesthood authority from the other.

The Records
Lehi kept a record, although we only know it through the writings of his sons. Nephi used his father's record in his own account on the large plates and the small plates.12 In the small plates, Nephi and Jacob give us portions from the record of Lehi interspersed in their own writings (see 1 Nephi 1– 2 Nephi 4; Jacob 2:23–24; 3:5). Nephi tells us he did not make a "full account of the things which [his] father hath written, for he hath written many things which he saw in visions and in dreams; and he also hath written many things which he prophesied and spake unto his children" but that he made an "abridgment of the record of [his] father" (1 Nephi 1:16–17).

A collection of the writings of Jeremiah was preserved on the brass plates and another passed down—now found in the Old Testament. The Book of Mormon records that the brass plates contained "the prophecies of the holy prophets, from the beginning, even down to the commencement of the reign of Zedekiah; and also many prophecies which have been spoken by the mouth of Jeremiah" (1 Nephi 5:13).13 Although we do not know the process by which the keeper of the brass plates acquired and wrote the prophecies on the plates, the book of Jeremiah is the only book in the entire Bible that tells us how it originated.

In 605 BC the Lord commanded Jeremiah to recite to his scribe Baruch all of the word of the Lord from the time of Josiah down to that moment (see Jeremiah 36:1–4). Jeremiah then commanded Baruch to take this scroll and read it to the people in the precincts of the temple (see Jeremiah 36:8). This Baruch did, but, when King Jehoiakim heard about it, he ordered Baruch to deliver the scroll to the king. Jehoiakim had a servant read the scroll to him, and as he heard the words of the Lord read to him he took his knife and cut the scroll in pieces and burned it (see Jeremiah 36:20–26). The Lord then commanded Jeremiah to take a fresh scroll and give it to Baruch and to dictate again the prophecies. Baruch wrote down all of the prophecies that had been lost, together with many similar words (see Jeremiah 36:32).

From this account we learn many significant things about the book of Jeremiah, and several possibilities emerge as to how Jeremiah's writings were preserved on the brass plates. First, it seems clear that Jeremiah maintained the prophecies in his memory for a long time. Jehoiakim's destruction of the scroll of Jeremiah may have provided the impetus for the keeper of the record on the brass plates to acquire a copy of the prophecies of Jeremiah. The keeper of the brass plates could have had Jeremiah dictate the prophecies directly to him to be recorded on the plates; possibly Baruch loaned him the scroll; or perhaps the keeper of the brass plates copied the record from the second scroll as a backup in case the scroll was again destroyed. It is interesting that the Book of Mormon does not specify that the prophecies of Jeremiah up to the time of Zedekiah were preserved. Perhaps this is an indication that the sayings of Jeremiah were copied onto the brass plates in conjunction with the attempt to destroy the prophecies of Jeremiah during the reign of King Jehoiakim (see Jeremiah 36).

Prophetic Calling
Both prophets began their records with an account of their call. Jeremiah was called in his youth. In 627 BC the word of the Lord came to Jeremiah as a youth and called him to be a prophet to the nations, delivering messages of destruction—"to destroy, and to throw down"—and of restoration—"to build, and to plant" (Jeremiah 1:10). The Lord revealed to him, "Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee, and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations" (Jeremiah 1:5). Jeremiah was overwhelmed and replied in language rather like that of Enoch and Moses, "Ah, Lord God! behold, I cannot speak: for I am a child" (Jeremiah 1:6). The Lord commanded him to "be not afraid" (Jeremiah 1:7) to go where he was sent and to deliver the message, which was given symbolically to Jeremiah by the touch of the Lord's hand to his mouth (see Jeremiah 1:7–10). The Lord reassured him that "I have made thee this day a defenced city, and an iron pillar" against the kings, princes, priests, and people, and "they shall not prevail against thee; for I am with thee" (Jeremiah 1:19; see also 1:11–19). His entire life's mission consisted of delivering the word of the Lord and witnessing the calamities that befell those who would not respond.

Lehi, on the other hand, received his visionary call as a mature man, while praying "with all his heart, in behalf of his people" (1 Nephi 1:5)—behavior already suggesting prophetic stature. Because we do not have his complete record, we cannot be certain that this is the first time he received divine instruction, but it is the first vision that we have record of, and it is reminiscent of the vision in Isaiah chapter six, where that prophet saw the Lord upon his throne at the time he received his prophetic call (see Isaiah 6:1–13). Lehi recorded that "he thought he saw God sitting upon his throne" with the angels singing and praising God. He then saw one whose "luster was above that of the sun at noon-day" and "twelve others following him" (1 Nephi 1:8–10). Lehi was also given a book to read, from which he learned of the abominations and destruction of Jerusalem and that many would perish and many would be taken to Babylon in captivity. He did not respond with fear but with rejoicing, because the Lord is "merciful, thou wilt not suffer those who come unto thee that they shall perish!" In fact, "his whole heart was filled, because of the things which he had seen, yea, which the Lord had shown unto him" (1 Nephi 1:14–15). Lehi then "went forth among the people, and began to prophesy and to declare unto them concerning the things which he had both seen and heard" (1 Nephi 1:18).

Types of Moses and Types of Christ
Although Jeremiah and Lehi were both prophets and both delivered similar messages, their lives were quite different. Each of their ministries manifested the will of the Lord and testified of the Savior, but in very different ways.

Lehi and his family would relive the Exodus.14 Lehi received his call when he went before the Lord in the tradition of Moses as mediator for his people (see Exodus 32:30–32), praying "in behalf of his people" (1 Nephi 1:5). The Lord appeared to him just as he appeared to the children of Israel in the wilderness—as a "pillar of fire" (1 Nephi 1:6). Lehi became like Moses as he gathered his children, delivered them from the apostate and idolatrous world of Jerusalem, and led them into the wilderness. There they were tested and tried, as were the children of Israel. At the same time they were guided and protected by the Lord. Nevertheless, his family, like the children of Israel, responded by murmuring. Just as Moses suffered from the hardheartedness, stiffneckedness, and rebellion of the children of Israel, at one point including members of his own family, Aaron and Miriam, so did Lehi suffer from the rebellion of his own children. Furthermore, the children of Israel rebelled against Moses and sought to kill him; Laman and Lemuel, along with the children of Ishmael, rebelled against Lehi and attempted to kill him (see 1 Nephi 16:13; 17:44).

Whereas Moses led his people to Sinai, where they received the law on tablets of stone and built the ark and the tabernacle, Lehi led his people into the desert with the law safely preserved on plates of brass. After many trials the children of Israel entered Canaan, a land of milk and honey, under the direction of Joshua. Lehi led his family to the promised land—a land of great abundance given to them by covenant (see 1 Nephi 18:24–25)—with the same conditions given to the children of Israel as they entered Canaan: if they were righteous they would prosper; if they were wicked they would be destroyed (see 2 Nephi 1:20).

Moses, before he was taken away from his people,15 gathered the children of Israel and pronounced a series of blessings and curses upon their heads and prophesied that in the future the children of Israel would be scattered by their enemies and then gathered (see Deuteronomy 27–30). Likewise, Lehi, on his deathbed, gathered his posterity around him and pronounced upon them conditional blessings and curses. Lehi saw his seed both blessed and cursed, depending on their acceptance of the Holy One of Israel, and their eventual destruction, scattering, and gathering (see 2 Nephi 1:1–4:12).

Lehi would be remembered by his descendants as the deliverer and the founder of their community (see Mosiah 7:19–20), and the divine deliverance of Lehi and his family was understood as a type and a shadow of the divine deliverance from sin and death that would be provided in the future by the atonement (see Alma 36:28–29). Lehi was a patriarch over a family that would build, plant, and establish a covenant community that would last for more than a thousand years. They would write a book that would contain the fulness of the gospel and would be one of the keystones of the restoration. This book would be restored in the latter days to bring Lehi's descendants back to a knowledge of the covenants and to Christ.

The course of Jeremiah's life tragically turned out to be a reversal of the exodus. Whereas Moses led his people away from idolatrous Egypt and presided over a people that wandered in the wilderness for forty years until they had purified themselves to enter the promised land, Jeremiah ministered for forty years (627–587 BC) to a people who became increasingly wicked until they were expelled from the promised land. Jeremiah was a prophet whose mission can be seen as opposite to that of Moses.16 Moses openly contested the gods of Pharaoh and demonstrated the power of God to deliver his people at the Red Sea. Jeremiah called the people to repent of their worship of idols but openly urged them to surrender and taught them that it was the Lord's will for them to submit to wicked and idolatrous Babylon. Although Moses heroically interceded for his people at Sinai, Jeremiah was commanded not to intercede for his people (see Jeremiah 7:16–20; 15:1–4). Moses was the intermediary who established the covenant with Israel at Sinai and brought to his people the law inscribed on stone. Jeremiah looked forward to the establishment of the new covenant when the law would be written on the fleshy tablets of the heart (see Jeremiah 31:31–34). Moses left his people at Nebo on the threshold of the promised land; Jeremiah was forced by his friends to leave the promised land and, crossing the wilderness, to enter Egypt. His final words were prophecies foretelling the destruction of those from Judah who would return to Egypt and resume the practice of idolatry (see Jeremiah 44).

Both Moses and Jeremiah were types of Christ, but they each manifested different aspects of his mission. Moses was a prophet who demonstrated the power of God over the elements and over Israel's enemies. He had the power to prophesy the future. He was a deliverer, redeemer, and lawgiver. Moses, in one of his final sermons, pronounced one of the most prominent of the messianic prophecies: "The Lord thy God will raise up unto thee a Prophet from the midst of thee, of thy brethren, like unto me, unto him ye shall hearken" (Deuteronomy 18:15). Jeremiah, throughout his ministry, eloquently demonstrated to his people the type of a suffering servant. Because he had delivered his message, Jeremiah was persecuted, isolated, falsely accused, imprisoned, and tried for his life. He protested his innocence: "But I was like a lamb or an ox that is brought to the slaughter" (Jeremiah 11:19; cf. Isaiah 53:7). Just as Moses suffered the murmuring of his brother and sister, Aaron and Miriam, and Lehi the rebellion of his sons, Laman and Lemuel, so too Jeremiah was rejected by his village (see Jeremiah 11:18–23) and by his own immediate family (see Jeremiah 12:6).

An overlooked role of Jeremiah's life was that he presided over the exile from afar. Many of the righteous among Israel were exiled to Babylon, and Jeremiah, although he had no direct descendants that we know of, was a patriarch over Israel in exile. He wrote a letter to the exiles urging them to build and to plant (see Jeremiah 29:5) and to raise their families where they were. Jeremiah advised his contemporaries to submit to Babylon, for the Lord was in charge. He told them that Israel would only be restored and gathered in the time of the Lord. The children of Israel emerged from the exile strengthened against idolatry. Jeremiah was remembered by his people as providing the model of living in the exile, of patiently submitting to the political rule of other powerful nations until the Lord again would gather and restore them to their homeland. In a sense, Jeremiah was the father of the Jews in exile. The model authored by Jeremiah has been followed by the Jews until the twentieth century, when they again established a homeland in Israel and began to exercise political independence.

"The Manner of Prophesying"
There was a sophisticated tradition or style of prophecy among the ancient Israelites called by Nephi "the manner of prophesying among the Jews" (2 Nephi 25:1). The word of the Lord was communicated to the prophets through dreams, visions, or sometimes through the spoken word. It was often presented in poetry, replete with dramatic and vivid imagery and symbols. Sometimes the prophets communicated the word of the Lord orally, sometimes in writing, and sometimes through symbolic acts. Jeremiah and Lehi are both prime examples of prophets within this tradition. They were both visionary men whose lives and prophecies were full of graphic symbols and images.

Many of Lehi's divine communications came through dreams and visions. At the outset of his ministry he saw God on his throne and the coming of the Savior, and he read a book containing the abominations of his people. He then saw the marvelous vision of the tree of life that represented the quest for eternal life (see 1 Nephi 8). In this vision Lehi saw his family following a path, holding to a rod of iron, and moving through the mist of darkness toward the tree of life to partake of the fruit. Laman and Lemuel would not partake of the fruit, and Lehi used his account of this vision to exhort his sons to hearken to his words and seek the mercy of the Lord. Nephi, desiring to "see, and hear, and know of these things," prayed to the Lord for help in understanding. In response, he was told that "the mysteries of God shall be unfolded . . . by the power of the Holy Ghost" (1 Nephi 10:17, 19). Laman and Lemuel were not able to understand the symbolism of Lehi's vision and complained, "We cannot understand the words which our father hath spoken," and Nephi asked them, "Have ye inquired of the Lord?" (1 Nephi 15:7, 8). On another occasion in the wilderness, Lehi named the river Laman and the valley Lemuel in a dramatic attempt to teach his sons through symbolic acts.

Jeremiah too had visions—frequently occasions when the Lord used ordinary objects to teach divine truths such as an almond rod (see Jeremiah 1:11–12), a seething pot (see Jeremiah 1:13–14), a basket of figs (see Jeremiah 24), and a cup of wrath (see Jeremiah 25:15–38). Throughout his ministry Jeremiah was called upon to perform a series of dramatic symbolic acts to teach his people: burying a linen girdle as a symbol of the exile (see Jeremiah 13), watching a potter at work as a symbol of the destruction and restoration of Israel (see Jeremiah 18), breaking an earthen flask as a symbol of destruction (see Jeremiah 19), wearing a yoke as a symbol of captivity (see Jeremiah 27:2–28:17), purchasing land in Anathoth as a symbol of return and restoration (see Jeremiah 32:6–44), and bringing the Rechabites before the king as an example of a people faithful to their covenants.

Message: Repent or Be Destroyed
The prophecies of Jeremiah and Lehi have four common and central themes: repentance and the impending destruction and exile by the Babylonians; the coming of the Messiah; the future scattering and gathering of Israel; and the eventual restoration of the gospel in the latter days.

Lehi and Jeremiah Compared

S. Kent Brown

 

Jeremiah

Lehi

His home1

Born at Anathoth, two miles NE of Jerusalem (see Jeremiah 1:6)

Near but outside Jerusalem (see 1 Nephi 3:22)

Year of birth2

Around 640 BC

Around 640 BC

Age at call2

A "child" or youth (Jeremiah 1:6)

An adult with a family

Main message to citizens3

Repent or be destroyed

Repent or be destroyed

Response to citizenry3

Persecution

Fled Jerusalem before its destruction;

Fate4

Survived destruction; kidnapped to Egypt (see Jeremiah 43:1–7) and presumably died there

died in New World.

1. Jeremiah was born in the village of Anathoth, two miles northeast of Jerusalem, although he spent most of his adult life in the city. Despite Nephi's note that his father Lehi "dwelt at Jerusalem" (1 Nephi 1:4), his estate lay outside the city itself, though likely not far for his sons were thoroughly familiar with the city, as 1 Nephi 3:22–23; 4:5–7, 20 indicate.
2. Jack R. Lundborn, "Jeremiah (Prophet)," Anchor Bible Dictionary 3:686, considers him to have been between 11 and 15 at the time of his call, but he was commanded not to marry (see Jeremiah 16:2–4). When Lehi received his call (see 1 Nephi 1:5–15, 18), he was already a father, probably of six children; see John L. Sorenson, "The Composition of Lehi's Family," in By Study and Also by Faith, Essays in Honor of Hugh W. Nibley, ed. John M. Lundquist and Stephen D. Ricks (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book and FARMS, 1990), 2:176.
3. The major thrust of each prophet's message was repentance because of the imminent destruction of the city (see, for example, Jeremiah 4:4, 14; 1 Nephi 1:13,18). For their words both of them reaped persecution (see, for example, Jeremiah 11:18–23; 12:6; 1 Nephi 1:19–20; 7:14).
4. Jeremiah survived the fall of the city, only to be forced to go to Egypt with people who feared reprisals after the assassination of the governor appointed by the Babylonian king (see Jeremiah 43:4–7). Lehi fled from Jerusalem before its final siege, then journeyed through Arabia with his family to a place where they built the ship that carried them to the New World.

In the years preceding Lehi's departure from Jerusalem, King Josiah had cleansed the temple and renewed the covenant between the Lord and his people. What should have been the best of times, however, had become the worst of times. Lehi testified to Jerusalem of her "wickedness and . . . abominations" (1 Nephi 1:19), and Jeremiah spelled out what they were. At the beginning of the reign of Jehoiakim (609 BC), Jeremiah delivered a powerful sermon at the temple (see Jeremiah 7; 26). He warned his people that the temple would not save them from destruction if they did not repent. Although the sacrificial system of the law of Moses was faithfully being carried out at the temple, it masked the hypocrisy of the people who broke the Ten Commandments and worshipped idols. Jeremiah accused his people of stealing, murder, swearing falsely, all manner of idolatry (see Jeremiah 7:9), and of oppressing the stranger, the fatherless, and the widows (see Jeremiah 7:6). The people, on the other hand, trusted that the temple made them invincible. They probably looked back to the reign of Hezekiah when they were delivered from the Assyrian destruction in 701 BC by the miraculous destruction of the Assyrian army (see 2 Kings 19). The people thought that the Lord would deliver them from the Babylonians. This attitude is reflected in the Book of Mormon by Laman and Lemuel, who never did "believe that Jerusalem, that great city, could be destroyed" (1 Nephi 2:13; see also Helaman 8:21).

Both men were persecuted for their prophecies, and the Jews sought their lives. Jeremiah was repeatedly arrested, tried, and eventually put into a pit. Lehi's life was threatened in Jerusalem, and in the wilderness he had to face the murmuring and the persecution of his own sons (see 1 Nephi 2:13). That the threat to their lives was real is illustrated by the story in the book of Jeremiah of the prophet Uriah, the son of Shemaiah, who prophesied against Jerusalem during the reign of King Jehoiakim according to all the words of Jeremiah. When the king heard his words, he sought his life; Uriah fled to Egypt but was forcefully extradited and taken back to Jerusalem, where the king had him executed with a sword and thrown into a common grave (see Jeremiah 26:20–23).

Lehi was able to escape the destruction of Jerusalem that he witnessed in vision (see 2 Nephi 1:4). Jeremiah witnessed with his own eyes the disaster that he had attempted for forty years to avoid—the destruction of his people and the exile of the remainder. Jeremiah's record contains a sobering description of what would have happened to Lehi's family had they remained in Jerusalem. Jeremiah describes the Babylonian siege that lasted two and a half years and tells us that famine ravaged the city; when the city fell, many were slain, the temple was sacked and burned, and most of the survivors were taken into exile (see Jeremiah 39; 52). In the book of Lamentations Jeremiah describes young and old, virgins and young men, lying dead in the streets (see Lamentations 2:21); the famine became so intense that "pitiful women" cooked and ate "their own children" (Lamentations 4:10).

Message: Christ
Both prophets saw and prophesied the coming of the Messiah. Lehi saw a vision in which he read from a book things that "manifested plainly of the coming of a Messiah, and also the redemption of the world" (1 Nephi 1:19). Lehi further described a detailed dream in which he saw the coming of John the Baptist, John's baptism of the Messiah, and the ministry of the Savior, his rejection and crucifixion on earth, and his resurrection (see 1 Nephi 10:4–11). Most important, Lehi, in a masterful sermon directed to his son Jacob, taught the doctrine of the fall and the atonement and how the plan makes eternal life possible (see 2 Nephi 2).

The prophet Nephi (son of Helaman) taught his people that many Old Testament prophets including Jeremiah had seen the day of the coming of the Messiah and the redemption that he would bring (see Helaman 8:20, 22–23). The writings of Jeremiah in the Bible indeed contain two such prophecies about the coming of the Messiah (see Jeremiah 23:1–8; 33:15–18)—perhaps there were more on the brass plates that are no longer preserved in the Bible. Both prophecies foresaw the day when God will "raise unto David a righteous Branch, and a King" who will "reign and prosper, and shall execute judgment and justice in the earth" (Jeremiah 23:5; see also 33:15). Interpreters have variously seen these prophecies as pointing to either the first or the second comings of Christ or both.

Message: Scattering and Restoration
Jeremiah and Lehi are central to the restoration. Not only did they see and prophesy the events of the restoration, but their records played a significant role in the reestablishment of the covenant in the fulness of times. In 1823 Moroni appeared to Joseph Smith and read to him a series of Old Testament prophecies to be fulfilled in the restoration. Among these prophecies were Malachi 3–4; Isaiah 11; Acts 3:22–23; Joel 2:28–32 (see JS—H 1:36–41). Oliver Cowdery recorded that Moroni also had read a series of passages from Jeremiah including 16:16; 30:18–21; 31:1, 6, 8, 27–28, 32–33; 50:4–5.17 In these passages Jeremiah saw the day when the "hunters" and "fishers" would be sent forth to gather Israel (Jeremiah 16:16); when God would gather Israel to be his people (see Jeremiah 31:1); when "the watchmen upon the mount Ephraim shall cry, Arise ye, and let us go up to Zion unto the Lord our God" (Jeremiah 31:6); when the Lord would "sow" again the land with the seed of the house of Israel and Judah, who would then build and plant (Jeremiah 31:27–28); and when the Lord would "make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah" (Jeremiah 31:31)—in the words of the Lord, "Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers" in Egypt, which was written in stone, but a "law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts" (Jeremiah 31:32, 33).18

Lehi delivered to his family a prophecy given by the Lord to Joseph of Egypt that a "righteous branch" of the house of Israel, not the Messiah (2 Nephi 3:5), would be broken off, and in the future a choice seer would be raised out of this lineage (see 2 Nephi 3:6) who would bring many to the knowledge of the covenants made with the fathers (see 2 Nephi 3:7). He continued that the descendants of Judah and the descendants of Joseph would both write records that would "grow together, unto the confounding of false doctrines and laying down of contentions, and establishing peace among the fruit of thy loins, and bringing them to the knowledge of their fathers in the latter days, and also to the knowledge of my covenants, saith the Lord" (2 Nephi 3:12).

Lehi and Jeremiah both participated in the fulfillment of these prophecies. Lehi, a descendant of Joseph, founded the people that would author the Book of Mormon. In 1827 Moroni delivered the gold plates, containing a record of Lehi's descendants, to Joseph Smith, fulfilling the prophecy of Joseph of Egypt. For Joseph Smith was "a choice seer" from the loins of Joseph (2 Nephi 3:7) with the power to bring forth the word of the Lord to Lehi's seed (see 2 Nephi 3:11). He was named after Joseph of old and after his father Joseph (see 2 Nephi 3:15). The Book of Mormon would be an instrument in the hand of the Lord to bring his children to Christ through the restoration and to bring about the gathering of Israel and Judah in the latter days.

Jeremiah died in obscurity in Egypt, but his words were passed down through the ages in the Bible, the writings of the Jews. In 1830 the Book of Mormon was published, and with the publication of the Book of Mormon the records of these two peoples were joined, fulfilling the prophecy of Joseph of Egypt that these records "shall grow together" to bring many to the knowledge of the covenants (see 2 Nephi 3:12). Although the will of the Lord was manifested very differently in their lives and writings, Lehi and Jeremiah in their prophetic callings proclaimed to all their witness of Christ.

 

Notes

1. Besides Jeremiah and Lehi, from this period we know of the prophetess Huldah and the prophets Zephaniah, Habakkuk, and Uriah of Kirjath-jearim (see Jeremiah 26) in Judah, and Ezekiel and Daniel in exile.

2. Some interpret the Book of Mormon evidence that Lehi left Jerusalem within a very short period after his call. Others have argued that he may have prophesied for ten years in Jerusalem before he left. See Randall P. Spackman, "The Jewish/Nephite Lunar Calendar," JBMS 7/1 (1998): 57.

3. See Hugh W. Nibley, Lehi in the Desert, The World of the Jaredites, There Were Jaredites (Salt Lake City: Deseret Books and FARMS, 1988), 34–42. See also John A. Tvedtnes, "Was Lehi a Caravaneer?" (FARMS, 1984).

4. S. Kent Brown, "What Is Isaiah Doing in First Nephi? Or, How Did Lehi's Family Fare so Far from Home," in From Jerusalem to Zarahemla (Provo, Utah: BYU Religious Studies Center, 1998), 12–17.

5. Nahman Avigad, Discovering Jerusalem (Nashville, Tenn.: Nelson, 1983), 54.

6. Some scholars believe this date represents the birth of Jeremiah, who was called from the womb—in which case he would be almost 30 when the Book of Mormon opens, younger than Lehi.

7. Magen Broshi, "Estimating the Population of Ancient Jerusalem," Biblical Archaeology Review 4/2 (1978): 12.

8. When Nephi and his brothers were sent back to Jerusalem to obtain the brass plates, they found it necessary to "go down to the land of our father's inheritance" (1 Nephi 3:16) in order to retrieve their property and "up again unto the house of Laban" (1 Nephi 3:23) to bargain with Laban for the plates (see 1 Nephi 3:22–24) . Some Latter-day Saint scholars believe this language indicates Lehi and his family lived "outside" of Jerusalem. Nibley, Lehi in the Desert, 7 n.12. See also Lynn M. and Hope Hilton, In Search of Lehi's Trail (Salt Lake City, Deseret Book, 1996), 34–35.

9. Randall P. Spackman, "Introduction to Book of Mormon Chronology: The Principal Prophecies, Calendars, and Dates." (FARMS, 1993), 6–14; and "The Jewish/Nephite Lunar Calendar," 57–59.

10. See W. L. Holladay, Jeremiah (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1986), 1:1–10, for a chronology of events in Jeremiah's prophetic career.

11. See TPJS, 180–81.

12. The translation of Mormon's abridgment of the large plates for the period from Lehi to Mosiah was part of the 116 pages lost by Martin Harris (HC, 1:20–28; D&C 3, 10). For a discussion of Lehi's record, see S. Kent Brown, "Recovering the Missing Record of Lehi," in From Jerusalem to Zarahemla, 28–54.

13. The writings of several prophets that are preserved on the brass plates are not found in the Old Testament: Zenos, Zenock, Neum, and Ezias (see 1 Nephi 19:10; Helaman 8:19–20).

14. Important articles discussing the exodus typology in the Book of Mormon include George S. Tate, "The Typology of the Exodus Pattern in the Book of Mormon," in Literature of Belief: Sacred Scripture and Religious Experience, ed. Neal E. Lambert (Provo, Utah: BYU Religious Studies Center, 1981), 245–62; S. Kent Brown, "The Exodus Pattern in the Book of Mormon," in From Jerusalem to Zarahemla, 75–98.

15. Although the biblical text implies that Moses died, the Book of Mormon makes it clear that he was actually translated (see Alma 45:19).

16. Some scholars have even called him an "anti-Moses." See, for example, Luis A. Schokel, "Jeremías como anti-Moisés," in De la Torah au Messie, Mélanges Henri Cazelles, ed. M. Carrez, J. Doré, and P. Grelot (Paris: Desclée, 1981), 245–54.

17. Oliver Cowdery's report is found in the Messenger and Advocate 1/5 (1835): 78–80; 1/7 (1935): 108–12; and 1/10 (1835): 156–59. A convenient list and important discussion of these passages can be found in Kent P. Jackson, "The Appearance of Moroni to Joseph Smith (JS—H 27–49)," in Studies in Scripture: Volume Two: The Pearl of Great Price, ed. Robert L. Millet and Kent P. Jackson (Salt Lake City: Randall Book, 1985), 339–66.

18. See TPJS, 14–15.

There was trouble in Babylon and the countries around Judah tried to break away from Babylon, when Babylon came back they came with a vengeance, there wasn’t any help from Egypt.

 

Verses 2-11 – The Lord brought this yoke upon you, serve Babylon, if you try to break this yoke you will be humbled, this trouble comes from my hand (Jehovah).

 

If this is what it takes to bring you back to me, so be it. 

 

Verses 12-18 – Jehovah is behind this

 

The temple vessels were not taken in the 1st siege but were taken back to Babylon on the 2nd visit!  When Ezra returned with the remnant the vessels were brought back to Jerusalem.

 

27:1-22 In the beginning of the reign of Jehoiakim . . . came this word unto Jeremiah from the Lord, saying . . . Make thee bonds and yokes, and put them upon thy neck

 

Symbolic "bonds and yokes" were to be prepared by the prophet about eleven years before Zedekiah's time and sent to the neighboring nations with the warning that the Lord was permitting Babylon as His "servant" to dominate them for a time (Jer. 27:6-8). The false "prophets" who promised them safety, or said the vessels taken earlier from the temple would soon be returned, were not to be trusted. The way for Zedekiah of Judah to survive was to submit to Babylon. Otherwise, the temple would be destroyed and its vessels, font, and pillars taken away (Jer. 27:19Jer. 27:9-22; cf. 39; 2 Kgs. 25).

 

 

(Ellis T. Rasmussen, A Latter-day Saint Commentary on the Old Testament [Salt Lake City: Deseret, 1993], 561.)

 

Jeremiah 28 – The contest between a prophet of God and a false prophet, a death sentence comes upon Hannaniah.

 

(Jeremiah 28:1-17.)

 

1 And it came to pass the same year, in the beginning of the reign of Zedekiah king of Judah, in the fourth year, and in the fifth month, that Hananiah the son of Azur the prophet, which was of Gibeon, spake unto me in the house of the LORD, in the presence of the priests and of all the people, saying,

 

2 Thus speaketh the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel, saying, I have broken the yoke of the king of Babylon.

 

3 Within two full years will I bring again into this place all the vessels of the LORD's house, that Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon took away from this place, and carried them to Babylon:

 

4 And I will bring again to this place Jeconiah the son of Jehoiakim king of Judah, with all the captives of Judah, that went into Babylon, saith the LORD: for I will break the yoke of the king of Babylon.

 

5 ¶ Then the prophet Jeremiah said unto the prophet Hananiah in the presence of the priests, and in the presence of all the people that stood in the house of the LORD,

 

6 Even the prophet Jeremiah said, Amen: the LORD do so: the LORD perform thy words which thou hast prophesied, to bring again the vessels of the LORD's house, and all that is carried away captive, from Babylon into this place.

 

7 Nevertheless hear thou now this word that I speak in thine ears, and in the ears of all the people;

 

8 The prophets that have been before me and before thee of old prophesied both against many countries, and against great kingdoms, of war, and of evil, and of pestilence.

 

9 The prophet which prophesieth of peace, when the word of the prophet shall come to pass, then shall the prophet be known, that the LORD hath truly sent him.

 

10 ¶ Then Hananiah the prophet took the yoke from off the prophet Jeremiah's neck, and brake it.

 

11 And Hananiah spake in the presence of all the people, saying, Thus saith the LORD; Even so will I break the yoke of Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon from the neck of all nations within the space of two full years. And the prophet Jeremiah went his way.

 

12 ¶ Then the word of the LORD came unto Jeremiah the prophet, after that Hananiah the prophet had broken the yoke from off the neck of the prophet Jeremiah, saying,

 

13 Go and tell Hananiah, saying, Thus saith the LORD; Thou hast broken the yokes of wood; but thou shalt make for them yokes of iron.

 

14 For thus saith the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel; I have put a yoke of iron upon the neck of all these nations, that they may serve Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon; and they shall serve him: and I have given him the beasts of the field also.

 

15 ¶ Then said the prophet Jeremiah unto Hananiah the prophet, Hear now, Hananiah; The LORD hath not sent thee; but thou makest this people to trust in a lie.

 

16 Therefore thus saith the LORD; Behold, I will cast thee from off the face of the earth: this year thou shalt die, because thou hast taught rebellion against the LORD.

 

17 So Hananiah the prophet died the same year in the seventh month.

 

 

 

The First Siege of Jerusalem (2 Kgs. 23-30-24:16; 2 Chron. 36:1-10)

 

In a little more than twenty years Jerusalem would fall. With Necho's victory over Josiah, Judah again became a tributary, this time to Egypt. Josiah's twenty-three-year-old son, Jehoahaz, was anointed king. Following in the evil footsteps of his great-grandfather, Manasseh, Jehoahaz ruled only three months (609 B.C.) before being removed by Necho and deported to Egypt (2 Kgs. 23:31-33). A puppet ruler named Eliakim, another son of Josiah, was then installed. Necho changed his name to Jehoiakim (609-598 B.C.) and forced him to exact massive tributes from the people of Judah (2 Kgs. 23:33, 35). Jehoiakim also followed in the footsteps of Manasseh, squandering funds and subjecting the people to forced labor (Jer. 22:13-19).

 

Egypt's dominance of Judah ended in 605 B.C., when Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon defeated Necho and his army at Carchemish, thus becoming the master of the Near East. Jehoiakim was now forced to submit to the Babylonian monarch and "became his servant three years: then he turned and rebelled against him" (2 Kgs. 24:1). The rebellion was a fatal error for Jehoiakim and Judah, even though retaliation was not immediate. Nebuchadnezzar had returned home to reorganize his armies after a battle with Egypt in 601 B.C. in which both sides sustained heavy losses. The Babylonian king did not march with his armies until December, 598 B.C., the same month in which Jehoiakim's eleven-year reign, declared "evil in the sight of the Lord" (2 Kgs. 23:37), ended with his death. fn Josiah's reforms had long since collapsed, and idolatrous worship returned along with the deterioration of public morality. Jeremiah, whose ministry overlapped with the reigns of Judah's last five kings, bore testimony of his country's degeneration (see Jer. 5:26-29; 7:1-18; 11:9-14).

 

Jehoiakim's eighteen-year-old son, Jehoiachin, also denounced as an evil ruler, was placed on the throne in 598 B.C. (2 Kgs. 24:9). The first Babylonian siege of Jerusalem occurred three months later, with the city surrendering to Nebuchadnezzar on 16 March 597 B.C. fn At this time, Jehoiachin, his mother, and the entire royal household were taken hostage and transported to Babylon (2 Kgs. 24:12). Along with the royal family, thousands of Judah's leaders, craftsmen, soldiers, and people of influence were carried away (2 Kgs. 24:14-16). This was the beginning of what is called "the Exile," the period in which the Jews were exiled from their homeland to Babylonia. It was the deportation which took Ezekiel, and probably also Daniel, to later begin prophetic ministries among the exiled Jews. The account states that "none remained, save the poorest sort of the people of the land" (2 Kgs. 24:14). We learn later, however, that a few people of status and leadership must have remained, for the weak character of Jehoiachin's successor would be no match for the stronger wills of some of the survivors. Nonetheless, Nebuchadnezzar's actions show that he did not want to leave anyone who might organize or carry out a rebellion.

 

The Final Days of Jerusalem (2 Kgs. 24:17-25:30; 2 Chron. 36:11-23)

 

The Babylonian ruler appointed Mattaniah, Josiah's son and Jehoiachin's uncle, to be king of Judah in 597 B.C. and changed his name to Zedekiah (2 Kgs. 24:17). Though Zedekiah was declared an evil king (2 Kgs. 24:19), there is evidence in the book of Jeremiah that he may have had some good intentions (Jer. 37:17-21; 38:7-28). He was a weak monarch, however, fearful of the people and unable to stand up to the nobles and his underlings (Jer. 38:5, 19). It was during the first year of his reign that Lehi and his family left Jerusalem (see 1 Ne. 1:4).

 

The ten years of Zedekiah's reign (597-587 B.C.), before the final siege and destruction of Jerusalem, were filled with strife, sedition, and continual agitation. Unrest was probably inflamed by the exhortations of self-appointed prophets who gave false hope to the leaders and people of Judah (Jer. 28:3Jer. 28:1-17; 29:8-9). Some of these were later executed by Nebuchadnezzar (Jer. 29:21-23). Jeremiah's denunciation of these uninspired prophets apparently fell on deaf ears (Jer. 27; 28; 29). So also did his warnings to Zedekiah to submit to the yoke of bondage under Nebuchadnezzar, for the unrighteous king openly rebelled (2 Chron. 36:12-13). Along with his condemnation of the false prophets, Jeremiah also wrote a letter to the exiled people, counseling them to prepare for a seventy-year stay in captivity (Jer. 29).

 

In January of 588 B.C., Jerusalem was placed under a blockade. fn Surrounding areas were taken over one by one until the city was encircled by the armies of Nebuchadnezzar (Jer. 34:7). The people of Jerusalem held out until July of 587 B.C., when the conquering armies prevailed "and the city was broken up" (2 Kgs. 25:1-2, 4). By this time the people of Jerusalem were in a desperate state because of famine (2 Kgs. 25:3). Zedekiah and his army fled under the cover of darkness toward the plain of Jordan but were overtaken by the army of the Chaldeans and brought before Nebuchadnezzar (2 Kgs. 25:4-6).

 

The sacking, spoiling, looting, burning, and physical cruelty to political prisoners by ancient Near Eastern conquerors is aptly illustrated in 2 Kings 25:7-21, as well as in the book of Jeremiah and other scriptures touching upon the final scenes in Jerusalem. No mercy was shown to the rebellious Zedekiah: he first was forced to witness the execution of his sons, fn then his eyes were put out, and finally he was bound in chains and transported to Babylon, where he remained until his death (2 Kgs. 25:7). A month later, Nebuzar-adan, commander of Nebuchadnezzar's guard, arrived in Jerusalem, torched the city, and leveled its walls (2 Kgs. 25:8-10), putting to an end not only Jerusalem but also the kingdom of Judah.

 

Much of the remaining population was deported to Babylon (2 Kgs. 25:11-12, 18-21). Nebuzar-adan only "left of the poor of the land to be vinedressers and husbandmen" (2 Kgs. 25:12). The final blow to the defeated people, a witness that God had forsaken them in their wickedness, was the sacking and destruction of the temple, built by Solomon three and one-half centuries earlier (2 Kgs. 25:13-17; Jer. 52). The once sacred and glorious temple and city of Jerusalem were reduced to rubble.

 

Gedaliah, a nobleman, fn was appointed governor over the remaining poor peasants. Even a puppet ruler was not safe in those turbulent times, for he was soon assassinated by Ishmael, a distant member of the royal family, with the assistance of other conspirators (2 Kgs. 25:25-26; Jer. 40:7-41:15). The murderers subsequently fled to Egypt, forcing the prophet Jeremiah to go with them (Jer. 41:16-43:7).

 

Second Kings concludes by telling of an event some thirty-seven years later. Nebuchadnezzar's son, Amel-marduk (562-560 B.C.), the Evil-merodach of the King James Version, ascended the throne of Babylon. For reasons that are unclear, he released the former king of Judah, Jehoiachin, from his long captivity in prison. He was subsequently treated very kindly, recognized as a legitimate ruler, though still a captive, and given a pension, "a daily rate for every day, all the days of his life" (2 Kgs. 25:30; see 25:27-30). It was through him that the royal lineage was preserved until the time of Jesus (Matt. 1:11-16).

 

 

(Kent P. Jackson, ed., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 4: 1 Kings to Malachi [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1993], 173.)

 

 

 

These are dangerous times; the Spirit is needed as a guide in their life (like ours today)

 

Many people who fight against Jehovah had their calling and destruction made sure.

 

We don’t know Isaiah as well as we know Jeremiah, that’s too bad.  There aren’t stories about Isaiah like there are about Jeremiah.

 

This chapter is like the conflict in Lehi’s own family, interesting parallel.

 

Jeremiah 29 – Jeremiah sends letters to those in Babylon.  You have a purpose in Babylon; it will be awhile until you can come home.  Learn your lessons so you will be ready to return.  Increase your numbers; you will need them when you return.

 

(Jeremiah 29:4-23.) – Jeremiah’s life was an object lesson for all of Judah.

 

4 Thus saith the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel, unto all that are carried away captives, whom I have caused to be carried away from Jerusalem unto Babylon;

 

5 Build ye houses, and dwell in them; and plant gardens, and eat the fruit of them;

 

6 Take ye wives, and beget sons and daughters; and take wives for your sons, and give your daughters to husbands, that they may bear sons and daughters; that ye may be increased there, and not diminished.

 

7 And seek the peace of the city whither I have caused you to be carried away captives, and pray unto the LORD for it: for in the peace thereof shall ye have peace.

 

8 ¶ For thus saith the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel; Let not your prophets and your diviners, that be in the midst of you, deceive you, neither hearken to your dreams which ye cause to be dreamed.

 

9 For they prophesy falsely unto you in my name: I have not sent them, saith the LORD.

 

10 ¶ For thus saith the LORD, That after seventy years be accomplished at Babylon I will visit you, and perform my good word toward you, in causing you to return to this place.

 

11 For I know the thoughts that I think toward you, saith the LORD, thoughts of peace, and not of evil, to give you an expected end.

 

12 Then shall ye call upon me, and ye shall go and pray unto me, and I will hearken unto you.

 

13 And ye shall seek me, and find me, when ye shall search for me with all your heart.

 

14 And I will be found of you, saith the LORD: and I will turn away your captivity, and I will gather you from all the nations, and from all the places whither I have driven you, saith the LORD; and I will bring you again into the place whence I caused you to be carried away captive.

 

15 ¶ Because ye have said, The LORD hath raised us up prophets in Babylon;

 

16 Know that thus saith the LORD of the king that sitteth upon the throne of David, and of all the people that dwelleth in this city, and of your brethren that are not gone forth with you into captivity;

 

17 Thus saith the LORD of hosts; Behold, I will send upon them the sword, the famine, and the pestilence, and will make them like vile figs, that cannot be eaten, they are so evil.

 

18 And I will persecute them with the sword, with the famine, and with the pestilence, and will deliver them to be removed to all the kingdoms of the earth, to be a curse, and an astonishment, and an hissing, and a reproach, among all the nations whither I have driven them:

 

19 Because they have not hearkened to my words, saith the LORD, which I sent unto them by my servants the prophets, rising up early and sending them; but ye would not hear, saith the LORD.

 

20 ¶ Hear ye therefore the word of the LORD, all ye of the captivity, whom I have sent from Jerusalem to Babylon:

 

21 Thus saith the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel, of Ahab the son of Kolaiah, and of Zedekiah the son of Maaseiah, which prophesy a lie unto you in my name; Behold, I will deliver them into the hand of Nebuchadrezzar king of Babylon; and he shall slay them before your eyes;

 

22 And of them shall be taken up a curse by all the captivity of Judah which are in Babylon, saying, The LORD make thee like Zedekiah and like Ahab, whom the king of Babylon roasted in the fire;

 

23 Because they have committed villany in Israel, and have committed adultery with their neighbours' wives, and have spoken lying words in my name, which I have not commanded them; even I know, and am a witness, saith the LORD.

 

 

In Jeremiah 29 we find a letter in which Jeremiah delivered the word of the Lord to those already in exile in Babylon. To the exiles the Lord said, "Build ye houses, and dwell in them; and plant gardens, and eat the fruit of them" (Jer. 29:5), all language reminiscent of Jeremiah's call "to build, and to plant" (Jer. 1:10). The point is that the Exile would be long, and therefore the people should live their lives, taking husbands and wives and begetting sons and daughters, with an understanding that Babylon would be home for them. In part this letter was a response to those false prophets in Babylon who apparently were raising the hopes of the people for a quick return (Jer. 29:7-9). The Lord even noted that two of those false prophets of the Exile would be turned over to Nebuchadnezzar and killed (Jer. 29:21). In a real sense, the scattering of Israel that had begun on a large scale with the deportation of the Northern Kingdom in the eighth century was being continued. Jeremiah's letter served to remind exiled Judah that though they should not become part of the world, they should learn to live in the world.

 (Kent P. Jackson, ed., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 4: 1 Kings to Malachi [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1993], 205 - 206.)

 

Jeremiah 30 – This is a chapter of hope and renewal great poetry, but it is quite away in the future, post Second Coming.  This has nothing to do with coming back from captivity in Babylon.

 

(Jeremiah 30:2-24.)

 

2 Thus speaketh the LORD God of Israel, saying, Write thee all the words that I have spoken unto thee in a book.

 

3 For, lo, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will bring again the captivity of my people Israel and Judah, saith the LORD: and I will cause them to return to the land that I gave to their fathers, and they shall possess it.

 

4 ¶ And these are the words that the LORD spake concerning Israel and concerning Judah.

 

5 For thus saith the LORD; We have heard a voice of trembling, of fear, and not of peace.

 

6 Ask ye now, and see whether a man doth travail with child? wherefore do I see every man with his hands on his loins, as a woman in travail, and all faces are turned into paleness?

 

7 Alas! for that day is great, so that none is like it: it is even the time of Jacob's trouble; but he shall be saved out of it.

 

8 For it shall come to pass in that day, saith the LORD of hosts, that I will break his yoke from off thy neck, and will burst thy bonds, and strangers shall no more serve themselves of him:

 

9 But they shall serve the LORD their God, and David their king, whom I will raise up unto them.

 

10 ¶ Therefore fear thou not, O my servant Jacob, saith the LORD; neither be dismayed, O Israel: for, lo, I will save thee from afar, and thy seed from the land of their captivity; and Jacob shall return, and shall be in rest, and be quiet, and none shall make him afraid.

 

11 For I am with thee, saith the LORD, to save thee: though I make a full end of all nations whither I have scattered thee, yet will I not make a full end of thee: but I will correct thee in measure, and will not leave thee altogether unpunished.

 

12 For thus saith the LORD, Thy bruise is incurable, and thy wound is grievous.

 

13 There is none to plead thy cause, that thou mayest be bound up: thou hast no healing medicines.

 

14 All thy lovers have forgotten thee; they seek thee not; for I have wounded thee with the wound of an enemy, with the chastisement of a cruel one, for the multitude of thine iniquity; because thy sins were increased.

 

15 Why criest thou for thine affliction? thy sorrow is incurable for the multitude of thine iniquity: because thy sins were increased, I have done these things unto thee.

 

16 Therefore all they that devour thee shall be devoured; and all thine adversaries, every one of them, shall go into captivity; and they that spoil thee shall be a spoil, and all that prey upon thee will I give for a prey.

 

17 For I will restore health unto thee, and I will heal thee of thy wounds, saith the LORD; because they called thee an Outcast, saying, This is Zion, whom no man seeketh after.

 

18 ¶ Thus saith the LORD; Behold, I will bring again the captivity of Jacob's tents, and have mercy on his dwellingplaces; and the city shall be builded upon her own heap, and the palace shall remain after the manner thereof.

 

19 And out of them shall proceed thanksgiving and the voice of them that make merry: and I will multiply them, and they shall not be few; I will also glorify them, and they shall not be small.

 

20 Their children also shall be as aforetime, and their congregation shall be established before me, and I will punish all that oppress them.

 

21 And their nobles shall be of themselves, and their governor shall proceed from the midst of them; and I will cause him to draw near, and he shall approach unto me: for who is this that engaged his heart to approach unto me? saith the LORD.

 

22 And ye shall be my people, and I will be your God.

 

23 Behold, the whirlwind of the LORD goeth forth with fury, a continuing whirlwind: it shall fall with pain upon the head of the wicked.

 

24 The fierce anger of the LORD shall not return, until he have done it, and until he have performed the intents of his heart: in the latter days ye shall consider it.

 

 

The Book of Consolation (Jer. 30:3Jer. 30-31)

 

Jeremiah's heavy burden of destruction and sorrow is balanced by equally weighty prophecies of restoration and consolation, collected in chapters 30 and 31. Hope is found in the promise of a restoration and renewal of the covenant — a new covenant — and a gathering and return to the Promised Land. These two chapters can be divided into three sections: chapter 30, prophecy of hope directed to Judah and Israel; 31:1-21, prophecy to Ephraim; 31:22-40, prophecy to Judah and Ephraim.

 

Chapter 30 looks to a day when Israel and Judah, referred to together with the name of their father Jacob, will be released from the yoke and bonds of their captivity (Jer. 30:3Jer. 30:3, 8), return to the land of their inheritance (Jer. 30:3Jer. 30:3), and "serve the Lord their God, and David their king" (Jer. 30:9). The imagery of return and restoration in this chapter is that of healing. The wounds had been caused by the Lord, "For I have wounded thee with the wound of an enemy, with the chastisement of a cruel one, for the multitude of thine iniquity; because thy sins were increased" (Jer. 30:14). Just as the wounds will be healed, so will the relationship be resumed: "Their children also shall be as aforetime, and their congregation shall be established before me" (Jer. 30:20). As in past days, the wrath of the Lord will be reserved for those who oppress his people (Jer. 30:20), and "it shall fall with pain upon the head of the wicked" (Jer. 30:23), who are the enemies of Israel, rather than fall on Israel herself.

 

The first part of chapter 31 contains a prophecy about the gathering of Israel. Parts of this prophecy are directed specifically to Ephraim, one of the ten tribes that were lost and scattered after the destruction of the kingdom of Israel by the Assyrians in 721 B.C. Clearly this vision is intended for the latter days. Once again, the key words from Jeremiah's call occur (Jer. 1:10): "build," in regard to the "virgin of Israel," an appellation often used for a city, and "plant," referring to the vines of Samaria (Jer. 31:4-5). Oliver Cowdery, in his summary of the things the angel Moroni taught Joseph Smith, quoted Jeremiah 31:6: fn "For there shall be a day, that the watchmen upon the mount Ephraim shall cry, Arise ye, and let us go up to Zion unto the Lord our God." The central event of this prophecy is the gathering: "Behold, I will bring them from the north country, and gather them from the coasts of the earth" (Jer. 31:8); and "Hear the word of the Lord, O ye nations, and declare it in the isles afar off, and say, He that scattered Israel will gather him, and keep him, as a shepherd doth his flock" (Jer. 31:10).

 

 

(Kent P. Jackson, ed., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 4: 1 Kings to Malachi [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1993], 252.)

 

 

The Northern kingdom is scattered and in agony, this will happen to Judah.  Eventually they will find peace and rest; they will be gathered back to their original lands. 

 

 

Verse 9 – David = Christ = Look at the chapter heading for Jeremiah 30.

 

 

 

Ezek. 37:25 my servant David shall be their prince for ever. The scriptures indicate that when the tribes of Israel are reunited as Ezekiel saw, their king will be like David of old, who reigned over a united Israel. Jeremiah prophesied that Israel would "serve the Lord their God, and David their king, whom I will raise up unto them"½ (Jer. 30:9Jer. 30:9; see also Ezek. 34:23-24; Hosea 3:5). This king is almost certainly Jesus Christ himself, of whom it was prophesied that God would give him "the throne of his father David: and he shall reign over the house of Jacob for ever; and of his kingdom there shall be no end" (Luke 1:32-33; see also Acts 2:30). 66

 

66. Most Latter-day Saint scholars agree that the millennial David is none other than Jesus Christ. See, for example, McConkie, Millennial Messiah, 602-11; New Witness, 518; Millet, "Life in the Millennium," 182; Jackson, "The Lord Is There," 306-7.

 

 (Donald W. Parry and Jay A. Parry, Understanding the Signs of the Times [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1999], 114 - 115.)

 

 

Verses 11-14 – I am the only one who can save thee, all others have left thee, they were sent to punish you for your sins which increased.  No hope if you don’t change your ways!  Turn back to me!

 

Some words from Jeremiah while in prison, and some from an earlier prophecy, seem to have inspired part of the third verse of the latter-day hymn "How Firm a Foundation" (Hymns [Salt Lake City: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 1985], no. 85; Jer. 30:11Jer. 30:10-11; 33:7).

 

The theme of restoration continues, promising the gathering of Judah and Israel and their establishment as a unified, righteous kingdom at last, with a divine "Branch" descended from David as King to "execute judgment and righteousness" (Jer. 33:7-18). The promise of these actions is as sure as the sequences of day and night and the order of the heavens and earth.

 

 

(Ellis T. Rasmussen, A Latter-day Saint Commentary on the Old Testament [Salt Lake City: Deseret, 1993], 565.)

 

All Nations Will Come to an End

 

 D&C 87:6

 

6 And thus, with the sword and by bloodshed the inhabitants of the earth shall mourn; and with famine, and plague, and earthquake, and the thunder of heaven, and the fierce and vivid lightning also, shall the inhabitants of the earth be made to feel the wrath, and indignation, and chastening hand of an Almighty God, until the consumption decreed hath made a full end of all nations.

 

The Lord has decreed that when he reigns on the earth in the Millennium, the world will no longer have any nations that were created by man. "It shall come to pass in that day," the Lord announced, "that I will seek to destroy all the nations that come against Jerusalem" (Zech. 12:9). "The consumption decreed [shall make] a full end of all nations," he said (D&C 87:6).

 

 If "all nations" have been destroyed, what remains is that which the Lord has established and created. As he said through Jeremiah, speaking to Israel: "I am with thee, saith the Lord, to save thee: though I make a full end of all nations whither I have scattered thee, yet will I not make a full end of thee: but I will correct thee in measure, and will not leave thee altogether unpunished" (Jer. 30:11; see also Jer. 47). Thus, all the nations of man will come to a full and complete end through the judgments of the last days, including the wars that precede the Lord's coming. But the nation that is bound to the Lord by covenant will continue. This nation is repentant Israel and, perhaps, a constitutional America.54 Thus, in the Millennium, the Lord will rule mankind from his two capital cities of Jerusalem and New Jerusalem: "Out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem" (Isa. 2:3).

 

 

(Donald W. Parry and Jay A. Parry, Understanding the Signs of the Times [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1999], 281.)

 

Verse 17 – I am the one who can restore thy health, 1 Nephi 11, come unto me so I can heal you.

 

Verses 18 -24 – They come back and are now into a state of happiness, the only way this happens is coming unto Christ.  Verse 22 is a classic, also Jeremiah 31:1

 

 

 

Jeremiah 31-35

 

October 26, 2006

 

 

When Moroni appeared to Joseph he quoted several scriptures, among those were portions of Jeremiah 31.

 

The Bible and the Angel Moroni

 

About three years after the First Vision, the Prophet received several visits from the angel Moroni. Although the central theme of Moroni's message to Joseph Smith appears to be the coming forth of the Book of Mormon, Moroni also quoted and explained numerous passages from the Bible. This appears to have been primarily for the purpose of orienting the young prophet in the Lord's plan for the last days.

 

Some of the passages Moroni quoted, as identified by the Prophet, were from the third and fourth chapters of Malachi, the eleventh chapter of Isaiah, the third chapter of Acts, and the second chapter of Joel. However, Joseph Smith also said that Moroni quoted and explained many other passages. (See JS-H 1:36-41.) Although these "other passages" are not identified in the Prophet's account, they are the subject of a series of letters written by Oliver Cowdery and published in the Latter Day Saints' Messenger and Advocate during the months of February and April 1835. In these letters Brother Cowdery stated that a major purpose of the angel Moroni's instruction was to inform the young prophet of the work of God on the earth in the last days and to give him a perspective of the magnitude of his calling so as to prepare him for the work. Old Testament scriptures played an important part in Moroni's instruction. Oliver Cowdery cited Ps. 100,  107, and 144, Isa. 1 and 2, and Jer. 31 as being among the passages Moroni quoted and explained to Joseph Smith.fn In his own account Joseph Smith stated that Moroni quoted some passages differently than they appear in the King James Version (see JS-H 1:36-39).

 

The First Vision and the instruction of Moroni thus greatly enlarged Joseph Smith's understanding of the Bible-he knew it was divinely inspired, but he also knew that certain passages should be rendered differently in order to convey the original meaning.

 

(Robert J. Matthews, A Bible! A Bible! [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1990], 14.)

 

 

The first part of chapter 31 contains a prophecy about the gathering of Israel. Parts of this prophecy are directed specifically to Ephraim, one of the ten tribes that were lost and scattered after the destruction of the kingdom of Israel by the Assyrians in 721 B.C. Clearly this vision is intended for the latter days. Once again, the key words from Jeremiah's call occur (Jer. 1:10): "build," in regard to the "virgin of Israel," an appellation often used for a city, and "plant," referring to the vines of Samaria (Jer. 31:4-5). Oliver Cowdery, in his summary of the things the angel Moroni taught Joseph Smith, quoted Jeremiah 31:6: fn "For there shall be a day, that the watchmen upon the mount Ephraim shall cry, Arise ye, and let us go up to Zion unto the Lord our God." The central event of this prophecy is the gathering: "Behold, I will bring them from the north country, and gather them from the coasts of the earth" (Jer. 31:8); and "Hear the word of the Lord, O ye nations, and declare it in the isles afar off, and say, He that scattered Israel will gather him, and keep him, as a shepherd doth his flock" (Jer. 31:10).

 

A New Covenant

 

The second half of Jeremiah 31 contains a prophecy directed to Judah and Israel — one of the most significant of all of the prophecies in Jeremiah (see a similar prophecy in Ezek. 11:19; 36:26-27). Several passages from this prophecy, according to Oliver Cowdery, were quoted or paraphrased to Joseph Smith by Moroni. fn In Jeremiah 31:28, the Lord recounted the call of Jeremiah and noted that as the destruction had and would occur, so also would the rebuilding: "And it shall come to pass, that like as I have watched over them, to pluck up, and to break down, and to throw down, and to destroy, and to afflict; so will I watch over them, to build, and to plant, saith the Lord" (Jer. 31:28). The final answer to the destruction that comes upon Israel through the breaking of the covenant is the making of a new covenant: "Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah: Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the Lord" (Jer. 31:31-32).

 

The fulfillment of this prophecy occurred in stages. First, in the universal sense, this prophecy was fulfilled by Christ. On the eve of his arrest, at the Last Supper, Jesus and his disciples celebrated, through the symbolism of the Passover meal, the miraculous deliverance from the bondage of Egypt and the destruction of Pharaoh's army at the Red Sea — events that are types of the Atonement, which delivers us from the bondage of sin and death. At the end of that Passover meal, when the events leading up to the covenant at Sinai were symbolized and the Passover lamb was eaten, Matthew records: "And as they were eating, Jesus took bread, and blessed it, and brake it, and gave it to the disciples, and said, Take, eat; this is my body. And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, Drink ye all of it; For this is my blood of the new testament ['covenant' fn, which is shed for many for the remission of sins" (Matt. 26:26-28). In the meridian of time, Christ literally fulfilled what had been symbolically celebrated through the law of sacrifice for millennia and meticulously observed through the Mosaic law for centuries. Jesus instructed his disciples that from that day forth the symbols of bread and wine would replace those of blood sacrifice as contained in the Passover. Whereas the blood sacrifice looked forward with faith and hope to the time when Christ would come and accomplish the Atonement, so the sacramental meal would look back. The symbolism of the historical event of the deliverance from Egypt and the miracle at the Red Sea was replaced by the symbolism of the historical event against which the Exodus pales in comparison: the Atonement and the conquest of sin and death. Christ, through his sacrifice, laid the foundation for the new covenant, by which men could implement the gospel in their lives, return again to God, and gain immortality and eternal life. It is from Christ's reference to "the new covenant" of Jeremiah 31:31 in Matthew 26:28 ("the new testament") that we have derived our designation of the "new covenant" as the New Testament, and thus "the old covenant" as the Old Testament.

 

Joseph Smith, in a letter in 1833, fn taught that in a more specific sense the "new covenant" was not completely fulfilled in the meridian of time: "Christ, in the days of His flesh, proposed to make a covenant with them, but they rejected Him and His proposals, and in consequence thereof, they were broken off, and no covenant was made with them at that time. But their unbelief has not rendered the promise of God of none effect: no, for there was another day limited in David, which was the day of His power; and then His people, Israel, should be a willing people;—and He would write His law in their hearts, and print it in their thoughts; their sins and their iniquities He would remember no more." fn

 

Jeremiah described the nature of this new covenant in the language of the Exodus known throughout Jeremiah: "But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the Lord, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people" (Jer. 31:33). The "heart" and "inward parts" represent an internalization of the covenant in the souls of those who accept it. Paul discussed the nature of this covenant, written "not in tables of stone, but in fleshy tables of the heart" (2 Cor. 3:3) and explained that this process of internalization can only occur through the power of the Spirit. The fulfillment of this prophecy is in process with the establishment of the new and everlasting covenant. It is "new" because, as the Lord said, "all old covenants have I caused to be done away in this thing"; and it is "everlasting" because it is "that which was from the beginning" (D&C 22:1).

 

(Kent P. Jackson, ed., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 4: 1 Kings to Malachi [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1993], 242 - 243.)

 

(Jeremiah 31:1-14.)

 

1 At the same time, saith the LORD, will I be the God of all the families of Israel, and they shall be my people.

 

2 Thus saith the LORD, The people which were left of the sword found grace in the wilderness; even Israel, when I went to cause him to rest.

 

3 The LORD hath appeared of old unto me, saying, Yea, I have loved thee with an everlasting love: therefore with lovingkindness have I drawn thee.

 

4 Again I will build thee, and thou shalt be built, O virgin of Israel: thou shalt again be adorned with thy tabrets, and shalt go forth in the dances of them that make merry.

 

5 Thou shalt yet plant vines upon the mountains of Samaria: the planters shall plant, and shall eat them as common things.

 

6 For there shall be a day, that the watchmen upon the mount Ephraim shall cry, Arise ye, and let us go up to Zion unto the LORD our God.

 

7 For thus saith the LORD; Sing with gladness for Jacob, and shout among the chief of the nations: publish ye, praise ye, and say, O LORD, save thy people, the remnant of Israel.

 

8 Behold, I will bring them from the north country, and gather them from the coasts of the earth, and with them the blind and the lame, the woman with child and her that travaileth with child together: a great company shall return thither.

 

9 They shall come with weeping, and with supplications will I lead them: I will cause them to walk by the rivers of waters in a straight way, wherein they shall not stumble: for I am a father to Israel, and Ephraim is my firstborn.

 

10 ¶ Hear the word of the LORD, O ye nations, and declare it in the isles afar off, and say, He that scattered Israel will gather him, and keep him, as a shepherd doth his flock.

 

11 For the LORD hath redeemed Jacob, and ransomed him from the hand of him that was stronger than he.

 

12 Therefore they shall come and sing in the height of Zion, and shall flow together to the goodness of the LORD, for wheat, and for wine, and for oil, and for the young of the flock and of the herd: and their soul shall be as a watered garden; and they shall not sorrow any more at all.

 

13 Then shall the virgin rejoice in the dance, both young men and old together: for I will turn their mourning into joy, and will comfort them, and make them rejoice from their sorrow.

 

14 And I will satiate the soul of the priests with fatness, and my people shall be satisfied with my goodness, saith the LORD.

 

 

Verses 2-3 – To those who stayed behind in Jerusalem they were not forgotten, grace was extended to them, they were alive and fed.  Eventually all were scattered among the Gentiles, they were looked after, cared for, and later they were taught the gospel of Jesus Christ.  Our Heavenly Father will do all in His power to bring the House of Israel home.  Even though the kingdom of Judah brought great trouble upon them, they were loved with an everlasting love.  Yet they were punished for their gross disobedience against Jehovah and the covenant they made with Him.

 

Verses 4-5 – We are happy and joyful today, a greater joy awaits us in the Millennium.  The planting of vineyards signified permanence; they will stay in the land for a long period of time.

 

 

Today in Israel, the Jews look at the land in historical terms, not spiritual.  They are of the House of Judah; the House of Israel will claim their portion after the 2nd coming.

 

Verse 6 – Zion is a millennial state, the Northern and Southern kingdoms will be reunited then.

 

The church exists today to prepare a people for the Millennium.  It will be a time of oneness between God and His people.  There will be no poor, Zion will be established.

 

New Jerusalem

 

For Latter-day Saints, the gathering of Israel in the last days, and the building of the city of Zion and of the New Jerusalem, are closely related concepts.

 

The tenth article of faith, written by the Prophet Joseph Smith in 1842, declares that the New Jerusalem will be built upon the American continent. He learned this as he translated the Book of Mormon (3 Ne. 20:22; Ether 13:2-6). Additional revelation on this subject came in September 1830 and was further clarified in the subsequent months (D&C 28:9; 42:33-36, 62, 67; 57:3). In July 1831, Joseph Smith traveled to Jackson County, Missouri, at the command of the Lord, where it was announced that the long-awaited gathering of Israel would commence. The city of Zion (also called the New Jerusalem) and its temple would be built in Independence, Missouri (D&C 57:1-3).

 

Even as the ancient tribes of Israel were scattered north of the Holy Land and their identity was lost, their prophets foretold a gathering of Israel in the last days in a consecrated land (Jer. 31:1-12). Zion would be reestablished. This prophecy includes the promise that the "pure in heart" will receive the higher principles and truths of the full gospel of Jesus Christ (D&C 97:21; 100:16; 101:18). Both where and how they live will come about under divine influence. Since favorable spiritual conditions may exist anywhere in the world, cities of Zion and of Zion people, the "pure in heart," could be located anywhere in the world (D&C 97:21). However, there is to be a "center place," or capital city, of Zion. It is referred to both as "the city of Zion" and as "the city of New Jerusalem" (D&C 57:2; 84:2; cf. 45:66-67).

 

The writings of Ether, written prior to 125 B.C., abridged by Moroni 2 in the Book of Mormon, prophesy of the preparations for the coming of the messiah and of a New Jerusalem in the Western Hemisphere. It is to be built by the remnant of the seed of Joseph of Egypt (Ether 13:3-10). Ether also speaks of the destruction of Jerusalem of old, adding that it will be rebuilt with a temple and become a holy city (Ether 13:11).

 

Also, the book of Revelation speaks of "the holy city, New Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven" (Rev. 21:2, 10). This may relate to the return of the city of Enoch, the Zion that in Enoch's day was caught up into heaven (Moses 7:12-21, 59-64).

 

The future rebuilding of the Holy Land for the house of Judah and the building of the New Jerusalem in the Western Hemisphere for the house of Joseph are associated with the return of the Messiah to the earth. Of this era, the 1845 Proclamation of the Twelve (MFP 1:252-66) says:

He will assemble the Natives, the remnants of Joseph in America; and make them a great, and strong, and powerful nation: and he will civilize and enlighten them, and will establish a holy city, and temple and seat of government among them, which shall be called Zion.

 

And there shall be his tabernacle, his sanctuary, his throne, and seat of government for the whole continent of North and South America for ever. In short, it will be to the western hemisphere what Jerusalem will be to the eastern….

 

The city of Zion, with its sanctuary and priesthood, and the glorious fulness of the gospel, will constitute a standard which will put an end to jarring creeds and political wranglings, by uniting the republics, states, provinces, territories, nations, tribes, kindred, tongues, people and sects of North and South America in one great and common bond of brotherhood. Truth and knowledge shall make them free, and love cement their union. The Lord also shall be their king and their lawgiver; while wars shall cease and peace prevail for a thousand years [pp. 259-60].

 

The prophet Isaiah declared that in a future time "out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem" (Isa. 2:2-3; cf. Micah 4:1-2). Latter-day Saints believe this refers to the two Zion headquarters in the two hemispheres from which the Messiah, the returned Son of God, will reign triumphantly over the whole earth.

GRAHAM W. DOXEY

 

(Encyclopedia of Mormonism, 1-4 vols., edited by Daniel H. Ludlow (New York: Macmillan, 1992), 1009.)

 

 

End of verse 7 – save thy people = Hosanna = “Jehovah save us please”, the please must be included, as a petition not as an order, who are we to direct Him?

 

Verse 8 – coast of the earth = not coasts as we think, but as regions on the earth.

 

Verse 9 – Father to Israel – Ephraim is the 1st born because of obedience, he receives a double portion of land and blessings.  His charge is missionary work, to gather in the House of Israel before the Millennium.  The other tribes will have assignments then, which we don’t know what they may be, the other tribes follow Ephraim.  Ephraim has the responsibility of the priesthood and keys right now.

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 133:26-40.)

 

26 And they who are in the north countries shall come in remembrance before the Lord; and their prophets shall hear his voice, and shall no longer stay themselves; and they shall smite the rocks, and the ice shall flow down at their presence.

 

27 And an highway shall be cast up in the midst of the great deep.

 

28 Their enemies shall become a prey unto them,

 

29 And in the barren deserts there shall come forth pools of living water; and the parched ground shall no longer be a thirsty land.

 

30 And they shall bring forth their rich treasures unto the children of Ephraim, my servants.

 

31 And the boundaries of the everlasting hills shall tremble at their presence.

 

32 And there shall they fall down and be crowned with glory, even in Zion, by the hands of the servants of the Lord, even the children of Ephraim.

 

33 And they shall be filled with songs of everlasting joy.

 

34 Behold, this is the blessing of the everlasting God upon the tribes of Israel, and the richer blessing upon the head of Ephraim and his fellows.

 

35 And they also of the tribe of Judah, after their pain, shall be sanctified in holiness before the Lord, to dwell in his presence day and night, forever and ever.

 

36 And now, verily saith the Lord, that these things might be known among you, O inhabitants of the earth, I have sent forth mine angel flying through the midst of heaven, having the everlasting gospel, who hath appeared unto some and hath committed it unto man, who shall appear unto many that dwell on the earth.

 

37 And this gospel shall be preached unto every nation, and kindred, and tongue, and people.

 

38 And the servants of God shall go forth, saying with a loud voice: Fear God and give glory to him, for the hour of his judgment is come;

 

39 And worship him that made heaven, and earth, and the sea, and the fountains of waters—

 

40 Calling upon the name of the Lord day and night, saying: O that thou wouldst rend the heavens, that thou wouldst come down, that the mountains might flow down at thy presence.

 

133:26

 

"they who are in the north countries"

 

This has reference to the return of the lost ten tribes of Israel. They will come out of the north countries, but some have questioned whether or not this means they are now living in the north countries.

 

"[Concerning the] bringing forth of the Lost Tribes from their hiding place, which is known to God, but unknown to man. Nevertheless, I have found elders in Israel who would tell me that the predictions relating to the Lost Tribes are to be explained in this figurative manner—that the gathering of those tribes is already well advanced and that there is no hiding place whereto God has led them, from which they shall come forth, led by their prophets to receive their blessings here at the hands of gathered Ephraim, the gathered portions that have been scattered among the nations. Yea, let God be true, and doubt we not his word, though it makes the opinions of men appear to be lies. The tribes shall come; they are not lost unto the Lord; they shall be brought forth as hath been predicted." (James E. Talmage, CR, October 1916, p. 76.)

 

"It is understood that the ten tribes of Israel, after their liberation from the captivity of the Assyrians, departed into the land northward and eventually were lost to the knowledge of other nations. Just where they went and where they are we do not know more than what the Lord has revealed. We learn from the Book of Mormon (3 Nephi, 15th and 16th chapters) that the Savior visited them and taught them the gospel. They have their records, and prophets have been among them to teach them in part, at least, the gospel. . . .

 

At a conference of the Church held in June 1831, the Prophet said that John the Revelator was then among the ten tribes of Israel who had been led away by Shalmaneser, king of Assyria, to prepare them for their return from their long dispersion." (Smith and Sjodahl, DCC, pp. 843-44.)

 

"But hear it all Israel, after your sorrow and pain and distress and after the days of your tribulation, your great Eloheim will stretch out his hand and gather you from every nation wherever you are driven, and he will bring you home to your own land, and you shall rebuild, your temple and city, and you shall be delivered by Shiloh when he comes. That will be fulfilled; and all that God has said with regard to the ten tribes of Israel, strange as it may appear, will come to pass. They will, as has been said concerning them, smite the rock, and the mountains of ice will flow before them, and a great highway will be cast up, and their enemies will become a prey to them; and their records, and their choice treasures they will bring with them to Zion. These things are as true as God lives." (Wilford Woodruff, JD 21:301.)

 

133:32

 

"and they shall . . . be crowned . . . by the hands of . . . the children of Ephraim"

 

"Joseph, son of Jacob, was blessed by the Lord with the birthright in Israel, and stood first among the sons of Jacob. This blessing was also the inheritance of Ephraim, the second son of Joseph. We read in the fifth chapter of Chronicles the following: 'The sons of Reuben, the firstborn of Israel, (for he was the firstborn; but forasmuch as he defiled his father's bed, his birthright was given unto the sons of Joseph, the son of Israel: and the genealogy is not to be reckoned after the birthright. For Judah prevailed above his brethren, and of him came the chief ruler, but the birthright was Joseph's.)' The Lord confirmed this through Jeremiah when he said: 'I am the father of Israel, and Ephraim is my firstborn' (Jer. 31:9). Thus, holding the first place in Israel, it is the right of Ephraim among the tribes to take the place of honor and stand at the head to minister unto the others. The Lord has called him to this mission in this dispensation. As the Tribes departed on their northern journey, many of the people fell by the way and mingled with the inhabitants of the land through which they passed. It is quite evident that those of Ephraim mingled with the nations in this way more than the people of any other tribe, for we have learned through revelation to Joseph Smith, that most of those now being gathered from the nations where the gospel has been preached, are of the lineage of Ephraim. This information has been imparted to thousands by our Patriarchs as they have been inspired to make the prediction on the heads of those who have received blessings at their hands. The Lord scattered the children of Ephraim that he might gather them in the latter days, to prepare the way for the coming of the other tribes to Zion. As the firstborn among the tribes, the Ephraimites receive the richer blessings and will be prepared through the fulness of the Priesthood to crown the people from the north with greater power pertaining to the gospel and their salvation when they come." (Smith and Sjodahl, DCC, p. 845)

 

133:34

 

"the richer blessing upon the head of Ephraim"

 

"It is my testimony that 'today' is the day of Ephraim. It is the day which the Lord has set to fulfil his promises made in the times of the Ancient Patriarchs, when he said that he would scatter Israel to the four corners of the world, and that Ephraim should be scattered in all the nations, and then in the 'last days' be gathered out again. [Jer. 30:3; 1 Nephi 19:15-16; 3 Nephi 5:24.] Many are being gathered out by our missionaries, as 'one of a family and two of a city' [Jer. 3:14] and they are found here, gathered into a gathering place appointed of the Lord, and they are receiving his blessings. This is why so many of us are declared to be of Ephraim." (Hyrum G. Smith, CR, April 1929, pp. 122-23.)

 

 

(Daniel H. Ludlow, A Companion to Your Study of the Doctrine and Covenants, 2 vols. [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1978], 1: 674.)

 

 

The king of Judah will rule during the Millennium, Christ is that ruler. 

 

Redemption means “to buy back”, it is associated with the Lord, not sin.  Jeremiah 32 tells a story of Jeremiah while in prison buying a parcel of land from a relative.  Leviticus 25 gives the rules and order of the family involved to be a Go’el (Redeemer). 

 

Israel as a slave to Assyria lost their land (their inheritance).  1 Nephi 19 laments the loss of the land; it will be redeemed someday by the Lord.

 

Israel—Gathered by Stages

 

"Hear the word of the Lord, O ye nations, and declare it in the isles afar off, and say, He that scattered Israel will gather him, and keep him, as a shepherd doth his flock. For the Lord hath redeemed Jacob, and ransomed him from the hand of him, that was stronger than he. Therefore they shall come and sing in the height of Zion, and shall flow together to the goodness of the Lord. . . . And my people shall be satisfied with my goodness, saith the Lord." (Jeremiah 31:6-14.)

 

"Behold, I will gather them out of all countries whither I have driven them in mine anger, and in my fury, and in great wrath; and I will bring them again unto this place, and I will cause them to dwell safely." Not only will Israel assemble in the tops of the mountains in western America; they will also flow together, one by one, and company by company to the very land and soil where the feet of their ancestors once trod. The gathering of Israel is to many places, under divers circumstances and in differing periods. "And they shall be my people, and I will be their God: and I will give them one heart, and one way, that they may fear me for ever, for the good of them, and of their children after them: and I will make an everlasting covenant with them, that I will not turn away from them, to do them good; but I will put my fear in their hearts, that they shall not depart from me." (Jeremiah 32:37-40.) In the full sense, the fulfillment of these words is Millennial. But, be it noted, always and under all circumstances, whenever Israel gathers, the Lord makes an everlasting covenant with them—the gospel covenant, the new and everlasting covenant, the same covenant he made with Abraham their father.

 

Nearly all of the prophecies about the gathering of Israel are fulfilled a little at a time, line upon line and precept upon precept, as it were. Most of them have a partial pre-Millennial fulfillment in our day, but in all their grandeur and beauty and fulness they will not come to pass until the wicked are destroyed and the God of Israel has come to reign over his own who are Israel. Thus, in a Millennial setting, in a day when "the Lord cometh" (Isaiah 26:21), "he shall cause them that come of Jacob to take root: Israel shall blossom and bud, and fill the face of the world with fruit." Then, in that day, "ye shall be gathered [gleaned] one by one, O ye children of Israel." (Isaiah 27:6, 12.) In that day the whole earth, having become Zion in all its parts, will be a gathering place; those of Israel in all nations will gather in their own areas. Indeed, in that day the nations of the earth as separate political divisions will cease. "I will make a full end of all the nations whither I have driven thee," saith the Lord, "and Jacob shall return, and be in rest and at ease, and none shall make him afraid." (Jeremiah 46:27-28.)

 

One of the greatest prophecies for which there has been a partial fulfillment up to this time, and which awaits a far grander and greater fulfillment in the days ahead, is given in these words: "Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah: not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the Lord." The Mosaic covenant, the law of carnal commandments, the lesser law, the preparatory gospel—all these shall have an end. They will be replaced with the gospel, the higher law, the eternal fulness that includes the covenant God made with Abraham.

 

"But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the Lord, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people." This is the gospel covenant. With whom shall it be made? Those who receive it will be the lost sheep of Israel, those who are a scattered remnant of the ancient Israelite people. The Lord's sheep shall hear his voice and be gathered into his fold. To a small extent and for a limited period, this covenant was made in the meridian of time; then came the day of universal apostasy. To a like extent it has been made again with us through the restoration of eternal truth in our day.

 

Why do we say it has been made so far only to a limited degree? Because, as the holy word affirms, it involves more than the mere receipt of the gospel. A covenant, to have full force and validity, must be accepted in full both by God in heaven and by man on earth. The grand part of the covenant is this: "They shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the Lord: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more." (Jeremiah 31:31-34.) As Joseph Smith taught in his great sermon on the Second Comforter, this promise has reference to the receipt of that added Comforter, which means that they have the personage of Jesus Christ to attend them and to appear unto them from time to time. Those so blessed are the ones who remain after the destruction of the wicked at the ushering in of the Millennium. (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p. 149.) That is to say, the complete fulfillment is Millennial.

 

The prophetic word speaks of Israel, of the remnants of that once-favored people who are now scattered in all the nations of the earth, of the literal seed of the bodies of the prophets of old; it says that these—the descendants of the ancients—shall be gathered. Of this there is no question. But what of the Gentiles in the last days? Is not the gospel for them also? In answer we ask: What of the Gentiles in the days of ancient Israel? Were they not the children of the Father of us all? And did not the Lord offer salvation to them as he did to his chosen seed? The answer is that the eternal blessings were offered preferentially to the seed of Jacob, but that the strangers within Israel's gates were invited to come also and partake of the blessings promised the faithful. In dedicating the temple in his day, Solomon prayed that the blessings of Israel might also rest upon the strangers among them, provided those who were alien to Israel sought the Lord and kept his commandments. And so it is today, and so it is with reference to the gathering of Israel. There is to be also a gathering of the Gentiles, and all the Gentiles who gather with Israel by accepting and living the gospel shall be adopted into the house of Israel and shall rise up and bless Abraham as their father.

 

In most pointed and precise language, Isaiah says, concerning the gathering of the Gentiles in the last days, that it shall be with them as it was with the righteous Gentiles in ancient days. "Neither let the son of the stranger, that hath joined himself to the Lord, speak, saying, The Lord hath utterly separated me from his people: neither let the eunuch say, Behold, I am a dry tree." Are the Gentiles denied gospel blessings? Shall the eunuchs have no hope of eternal families in the realms ahead?

 

"For thus saith the Lord unto the eunuchs that keep my sabbaths, and choose the things that please me, and take hold of my covenant; even unto them will I give in mine house and within my walls a place and a name better than of sons and of daughters: I will give them an everlasting name, that shall not be cut off." Gentiles and eunuchs and strangers may all be saved if they will join with Israel and keep the commandments. Indeed, rich blessings are reserved for them because they rise above their environment.

 

And as to the day of gathering, the holy word continues: "Also the sons of the stranger, that join themselves to the Lord, to serve him, and to love the name of the Lord, to be his servants, every one that keepeth the sabbath from polluting it, and taketh hold of my covenant; even them will I bring to my holy mountain, and make them joyful in my house of prayer: . . . for mine house shall be called an house of prayer for all people." The God of Israel is also the God of the whole earth; he seeks to save Israel and he seeks to save all men. The gospel goes first to Israel and then to all others.

 

Hence: "The Lord God which gathereth the outcasts of Israel saith, Yet will I gather others to him, beside those that are gathered unto him." (Isaiah 56:3-8.) All mankind may be saved by obedience to the laws and ordinances of the gospel. The gospel goes first to the chosen seed and from them to all others. In our day it is expanding out to include the seed of Cain from whom the curse has now been lifted. Even they, long denied these blessings, may now join with Israel in receiving the gospel, the priesthood, celestial marriage, and the fulness of the blessings and glories that come by faith and righteousness.

 

Jeremiah has a like prophecy about the gathering of the Gentiles. "Behold, I will pluck them out of their land," out of their ancient lands. That is, the Gentile nations shall be scattered. "And it shall come to pass, after that I have plucked them out I will return, and have compassion on them, and will bring them again, every man to his heritage, and every man to his land." They are promised not an inheritance in the lands of Israel, but in their own lands. "And it shall come to pass, if they will diligently learn the ways of my people, to swear by my name . . . then shall they be built in the midst of my people. But if they will not obey, I will utterly pluck up and destroy that nation, saith the Lord." (Jeremiah 12:14-17.)

 

 

(Bruce R. McConkie, A New Witness for the Articles of Faith [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1985], 547.)

 

Bruce talked about the cities set aside for the tribe of Levi; Jeremiah’s hometown was one of these cities.

 

Jeremiah was a Levite from Anathoth (see Josh. 21:18), one of the Levitical cities, which lay about one hour's walk over the Mount of Olives northeast of Jerusalem (still called in Arabic Anata). He is mentioned in the Book of Mormon, and Laban, an elder of the Jews, must have been acquainted with him (see 1 Ne. 5:13; 7:14; Helaman 8:20). The first year of Nebuchadnezzar was 605 B.C. Jeremiah began his ministry about 627 B.C., and he continued prophesying right to the day Nebuchadnezzar entered Jerusalem in 587 B.C.—a total of forty years (see Jer. 25:3). People may have begun to wonder about Jeremiah's prophecies when five years passed, then ten, then twenty. They could have become a little complacent, especially with false prophets predicting opposite and more comfortable prophecies. ("The prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests bear rule by their means; and my people love to have it so"; Jer. 5: 31.) Lamentations of Jeremiah are the prophet's eyewitness feelings over the destruction of Jerusalem. They are worth reading—aloud—for the depth of feeling in the loss of the City and Temple. The title of the book in the Greek Septuagint is Threnoi, and in the Latin Vulgate is called Threni, both meaning "tears." The Septuagint prefaces Lamentations with these lines: "And it came to pass after Israel had been taken away into captivity and Jerusalem had been laid waste that Jeremiah sat weeping and lamented this lamentation over Jerusalem and said . . ."

 

 Some people think prophets have no business involving themselves in politics. If so, they've never read the Old Testament. Elijah and Elisha were very involved in the politics of their day. Isaiah, Amos, Jeremiah, Daniel, and others, too, were also very involved in the politics of their day. The Lord is not limited in his sphere of influence.

 

 Jeremiah, like Isaiah and other prophets, followed the pattern of doom-hope. He foresaw doom-desolation-destruction, but he also foresaw a glorious time of reinstatement-restoration-redemption. Biblical scholars and archaeologists have also recognized this pattern in the prophets' writings. See, for example, Levine, Jerusalem Cathedra, 2:23. Specific references in Jeremiah to the Jews' return to Jerusalem ("the Jews" is used here in a national sense, meaning Israelites then living in the southern kingdom of Judah), and their prosperity in it are found in 3:17-18; 16:14-15; 23:3; 24:6-7; 30:3; 31:17; 32:37-38, 42; 33:15-16. Lehi similarly prophesied of hope in the future; see, for example, 1 Ne. 10:3.

 

 Read and compare Jeremiah 7, another scathing speech by the prophet in the court of the Temple. He condemned the people's false sense of security because of the Temple, and he cataloged the abominations for which they would be punished. The Lord's House would be destroyed, just as the holy sanctuary at Shiloh had been destroyed (see v. 12).

 

 

(David B. Galbraith, D. Kelly Ogden, and Andrew C. Skinner, Jerusalem: The Eternal City [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1996], 111.)

 

 

 (Jeremiah 32:6-15.)

 

6 ¶ And Jeremiah said, The word of the LORD came unto me, saying,

 

7 Behold, Hanameel the son of Shallum thine uncle shall come unto thee, saying, Buy thee my field that is in Anathoth: for the right of redemption is thine to buy it.

 

8 So Hanameel mine uncle's son came to me in the court of the prison according to the word of the LORD, and said unto me, Buy my field, I pray thee, that is in Anathoth, which is in the country of Benjamin: for the right of inheritance is thine, and the redemption is thine; buy it for thyself. Then I knew that this was the word of the LORD.

 

9 And I bought the field of Hanameel my uncle's son, that was in Anathoth, and weighed him the money, even seventeen shekels of silver.

 

10 And I subscribed the evidence, and sealed it, and took witnesses, and weighed him the money in the balances.

 

11 So I took the evidence of the purchase, both that which was sealed according to the law and custom, and that which was open:

 

12 And I gave the evidence of the purchase unto Baruch the son of Neriah, the son of Maaseiah, in the sight of Hanameel mine uncle's son, and in the presence of the witnesses that subscribed the book of the purchase, before all the Jews that sat in the court of the prison.

 

13 ¶ And I charged Baruch before them, saying,

 

14 Thus saith the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel; Take these evidences, this evidence of the purchase, both which is sealed, and this evidence which is open; and put them in an earthen vessel, that they may continue many days.

 

15 For thus saith the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel; Houses and fields and vineyards shall be possessed again in this land.

 

 

The land was bought during a lull in the siege.  The Lord commands and Jeremiah obeys, this is another object lesson about the eventual return of Israel.  Jeremiah receives an interesting answer to his prayer.  Zedekiah asks Jeremiah if the siege is over, ha, not quite!  He wouldn’t believe and do the right thing.  Details are in Jeremiah 37:12-18.

 

Verse 14 – The end product of the scattering is redemption, a cleansing.  Placing the deed in an earthen jar gives permanence to the act.  Like the Dead Sea scrolls.  The scattering has taken centuries, the gathering will also take time, both are processes not events.

 

32:1-44 The word that came to Jeremiah from the Lord in the tenth year of Zedekiah king of Judah, which was the eighteenth year of Nebuchadnezzar. For then the king of Babylon's army besieged Jerusalem

 

Significant incidents occurred in the life of the prophet at the beginning of Babylon's last siege of Jerusalem (ca. 587-586 B.C.; Jer. 37). Jeremiah had been remanded to "the court of the prison" for continually predicting Judah's inevitable overthrow by Babylon unless the king and people repented. A cousin of Jeremiah asked him to redeem some property of his family in Anathoth. After asking the Lord about it, Jeremiah did so as a symbolic act, signifying that though the Lord had said Judah would be captured, yet "houses and fields and vineyards shall be possessed again in this land" (Jer. 32:8Jer. 32:1-15).

 

With many avowals of faith that the Lord could do anything, the prophet asked for reassurance, and the word of the Lord came again, reaffirming that indeed nothing is "too hard" for the Lord. Though He would give Judah into the hands of the Chaldeans (Babylonians), He would bring them back to be His people again, and He would be their God. Then fields shall indeed be bought again, as symbolized by Jeremiah's act. The whole land shall be inhabited and productive at last.

 

 

(Ellis T. Rasmussen, A Latter-day Saint Commentary on the Old Testament [Salt Lake City: Deseret, 1993], 565.)

 

A prophet acts as a mediator between God and man.  

 

 

A Promise of Restoration (Jer. 32-33)

 

Jeremiah 32 and 33 can be read together with chapters 30 and 31 as parts of the Book of Consolation, because they contain prophecies of the restoration of Israel. In fact, the chronological notation in Jeremiah 32:1 (the tenth year of the reign of Zedekiah, 588 B.C.) would place this event between chapters 37 and 38. During Nebuchadnezzar's siege of Jerusalem, Jeremiah was imprisoned on account of his prophecies of destruction against the city (see Jer. 37:21) and his prophecies of the capture and exile of King Zedekiah. While Jeremiah was in prison, the Lord told him that his cousin Hanameel would come to him with an offer to allow him to purchase a piece of land in Anathoth that belonged in the family. According to the Law of Moses, land should always be kept in the family (Lev. 25:25), and any land that was in danger of being sold outside the family should be offered to another member of the family first. Hanameel came and the king allowed Jeremiah to leave prison long enough to go to Anathoth and complete the transaction. This purchase, by the prophet who had for years prophesied the destruction of Jerusalem and the exile of her people, became a symbolic act of the Lord's intention to one day restore the people to their land. In this act Jeremiah was symbolically fulfilling his call to build and to plant with the outward show of confidence that the return would occur. At the end of the chapter the Lord said, "Like as I have brought all this great evil upon this people, so will I bring upon them all the good that I have promised them. And fields shall be bought in this land . . . for I will cause their captivity to return" (Jer. 32:42-44).

 

(Kent P. Jackson, ed., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 4: 1 Kings to Malachi [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1993], 206.)

 

The church today buys land all over the earth, someday we will know why.  Interesting thought from Bruce.

 

Matthew 2 – Herod killing innocent children is another scriptural example like the destruction of Jerusalem where Mothers weep without comfort for their dead children. 

 

Jacob and Rachel have a son Benjamin, Rachel dies while Benjamin lives, this took place in Bethlehem,  great sorrow are found in all of these events.  How are they redeemed?

 

(Jeremiah 31:15-17.)

 

15 ¶ Thus saith the LORD; A voice was heard in Ramah, lamentation, and bitter weeping; Rahel weeping for her children refused to be comforted for her children, because they were not.

 

16 Thus saith the LORD; Refrain thy voice from weeping, and thine eyes from tears: for thy work shall be rewarded, saith the LORD; and they shall come again from the land of the enemy.

 

17 And there is hope in thine end, saith the LORD, that thy children shall come again to their own border.

 

31:1-40 At the same time, saith the Lord, will I be the God of all the families of Israel, and they shall be my people

 

This statement, which ends the previous chapter in the Hebrew scriptures (to avoid its ending with negative predictions), expresses the theme of chapter 31. It anticipates divine loving kindness, the gathering of Israel and Judah, the establishment of Zion, the restoration of spiritual fruitfulness, and the establishment of a new covenant. Pure joy in the restoration of Zion is symbolized by the virgins, the young men, and the old—all singing and dancing. Abundant sacrifices in thanksgiving respond to goodness from the Lord.

 

The next section harks back to the tragic times of the apostasy and loss of the northern ten tribes. "Ramah" is a point south of Jerusalem, looking toward Bethlehem; it is still called Ramat Rachel ("height of Rachel"), in memory of the death of Rachel, wife of Jacob, because she bore her last baby near that point and died. The original concept of her mourning for her children arose from the captivity of the ten tribes (whose leader was the birthright tribe of Ephraim, son of Joseph, son of Rachel and Jacob). This prophecy ends with anticipation of their return. Matthew adapted the words to characterize the lamentation in nearby Bethlehem after the slaughter of the innocents by Herod (Jer. 31:15Jer. 31:15-17; Matt. 2:1-2, 16-18).

 

Following Ephraim's "bemoaning himself," the prophet indicated that the Lord is aware of both their sorrow and their repentance and will speed the return of Ephraim and the others. The righteousness of those latter-day generations of Israel shall exceed that of the former who departed.

 

Judah too appeared in the prophet's vision of the return. With an anticipation of the new place of the true government and temple of God, the prophet "awoke" from the vision that must indeed have been sweet to him.

 

Then Jeremiah recorded the Lord's promises to "sow" Judah and Israel again with people and animals. At last the prophet could enjoy the other part of his mission—"to build, and to plant." The adage that the children suffer for the parents' deeds will no longer be heard; all will know that they are accountable only for their own sins.

 

The new covenant of the latter days will not be a set of standards imposed externally but an internal set, with individuals' minds and hearts committed to right and justice.

 

In conclusion, the prophet foresaw the establishment of the kingdom of God on earth for a time of peace forever, and ordinances of the new covenant will remain like the ordained motions of sun, moon, and stars.

 

 

(Ellis T. Rasmussen, A Latter-day Saint Commentary on the Old Testament [Salt Lake City: Deseret, 1993], 563.)

 

Parents today feel great sorrow when a child wanders from the gospel family.  Remember that they are Christ’s before you had them and they are still His afterwards, through the Atonement He has spiritually begotten all who enter into the covenant with Him. 

 

What binds us to Him is the Abrahamic covenant.  Because Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob were so faithful in keeping their part of the covenant the Lord is relentless in returning us to the fold, He is required to keep His end of the covenant.  He will do all He can within the law of agency, like Jonah, you can go to Nineveh or stay in the whale, your choice!

 

Today the House of Israel is quite different then our ancient ancestors, we find it repulsive to worship more then one God, we work at loving Jehovah with all our heart, the new covenant we enter with him more fully points our course of direction to Him.  There has been a cultural change over these many centuries.

(Jeremiah 31:31-34.) – Millennial fulfillment

 

31 ¶ Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:

 

32 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the LORD:

 

33 But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people.

 

34 And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD; for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.

 

 

"Things Too Wonderful for Me"

VAUGHN J. FEATHERSTONE


Vaughn J. Featherstone was a member of the Quorum of the Seventy of
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints when this devotional
address was given at Brigham Young University on 13 February 2001.

There is a scripture to which President Howard W. Hunter referred during the training of General Authorities at October conference 1992. I have written that statement in my scriptures in the margin. This is the scripture from Jeremiah 31:31–34:

Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:

Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; . . .

But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the Lord, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people.

And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the Lord: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.

 

It is my conviction that most of you will live to see that day. How can the great Jehovah put His law in our inward parts and write it in our hearts? Why will there no longer be a need to teach our neighbors? Why will He forgive our iniquity?

A year ago this coming April, President Packer, who, along with the Twelve Apostles, is responsible for the training of all of the General and Area Authorities, gave us counsel and direction that will lead to the fulfillment of the quote from Jeremiah. The training was the deepest and most meaningful of any I have experienced in my 29 years as a General Authority. It changed my life and, I would assume, the lives of all the Brethren. President Packer is a divine seer. He took the necessary preparation time and made the total effort required by the Lord to receive the direction necessary from the Lord. He read the books on Christ by Frederic William Farrar, possibly the most accurate biblical scholar outside of the Church. It is he and his writings that Elder James E. Talmage quotes in Jesus the Christ. Elder Bruce R. McConkie referred to his works often. President Packer read The New Foxe's Book of Martyrs, which I also picked up and read. The humiliation, suffering, and horror of the early Christians and the cruelty of the protesters is beyond our ability to comprehend. Most of the Christians were burned at the stake, had their flesh torn from them, were buried alive, or were put in dens with half-starved lions or tigers. These early Christians suffered the deepest, most penetrating pain possible, and almost to their dying breath called out to Jesus. It was as though they could already see Him. As I read stories of hundreds who suffered those horrific experiences, I wondered, and I hoped that if I were ever to be put in similar circumstances that I would suffer in the wonderful dignified way they did. I hope I would be strong enough to do that.

President Packer read Jesus the Christ again. He read every scripture about the Holy Ghost and the Spirit of God in the standard works. He pondered and prayed, and the revelation came. I am convinced it was not just to be lodged in the hearts of the Brethren but is revelation for the whole Church. I believe as General Authorities we are under the sacred and holy obligation to take the message to the Church. I believe you will hear more on this inspired subject in the days, months, and years ahead that will help and bless this Church more than anything else.

President Packer's message was that we must live worthy to have the Holy Ghost with us 24 hours a day, seven days a week, for the rest of our lives. This was not a message for us only; it is a message for every member of the Church. Can you imagine what would happen if every man, woman, youth, and child lived in such a way as to qualify? We would startle the world. Imagine 11 million members of the Church now, and then 20, 50, 80, and 100 million in the future having the constant companionship of the Holy Ghost.

It is my belief that President Howard W. Hunter, quoting that wonderful scripture in Jeremiah, knew that in a future day not many years off President Packer would help us qualify for the fulfillment of this wonderful blessing.

The second revelation of absolute and profound importance came as he and the Twelve encouraged us to testify of the Living Christ. You have read the declaration of the Living Christ by President Hinckley, his counselors, and the Quorum of the Twelve. How often do we testify of the things we hold most precious and dear in this life? For some it may be occasionally--i.e., once a year or once in a while when we are called upon to speak or in a testimony meeting. We are true disciples of Christ; we ought to testify every day in every Latter-day Saint home to our wives/husbands, siblings, and children. These are the people we should love most on this earth. These are those we want to know the truth of this mighty work. Opportunities will come at school, in our work, and in the community to testify to our friends and neighbors not of our faith in a humble and sweet way, as well as to testify to each other and build greater faith.

For example, a son may say to us, "I sure think President Hinckley is a good man."

We could say, "Indeed, he is wonderful."

What if instead we said, "Son, I know he is a prophet of God, a seer, and a revelator. He may be one of the greatest prophets that ever lived."

Can you see the difference? Can you feel the difference?

A daughter might say, "We have a nice bishop."

We could respond, "Yes, sweetheart, he is."

What if we took this opportunity to say, "Sweetheart, he was called by God by revelation. He has the mantle upon him, and he is guided by inspiration in his calling."

Children need to hear their parents testify. Siblings can strengthen each other, and their friends can be lifted spiritually.

Can you think of anything in this generation that would affect members of the Church more than living to be worthy of the Holy Ghost constantly and testifying as guided and directed by the Holy Ghost of the truth of this great, majestic, divine work and more especially of Him whose work this is?

This is how we will put His law in our inward parts, and it will be written in our hearts. It is how our iniquity will be forgiven. Of course, when we live worthy of the Holy Ghost, it will have required repentance, submission, and meekness. Then we will have qualified, and then the Holy Ghost will inspire us to testify and forgiveness will come.

Section 93 of the Doctrine and Covenants teaches us the reality of the possibility for every worthy member of this Church:

 

Verily, thus saith the Lord: It shall come to pass that every soul who forsaketh his sins and cometh unto me, and calleth on my name, and obeyeth my voice, and keepeth my commandments, shall see my face and know that I am. [D&C 93:1]

 

The Savior said "every soul," not just the Brethren or specially privileged souls--every soul. Can you comprehend the power that would surge through the Church if every soul sought to seek the face of Christ and know that He is? Remember, the Lord's promises are sure.

In the first section of the Doctrine and Covenants the Lord counsels us in this powerful declaration:

 

What I the Lord have spoken, I have spoken, and I excuse not myself; and though the heavens and the earth pass away, my word shall not pass away, but shall all be fulfilled, whether by mine own voice or by the voice of my servants, it is the same. [D&C 1:38]

 

In D&C 18:36 the Lord teaches, "Wherefore, you can testify that you have heard my voice." If ever I have heard the Lord's voice, it is in the declaration from D&C 1. There is a witness that penetrates my heart and soul that what the Lord states is truth. Like Jeremiah, I thrill that "his word [is] in mine heart as a burning fire shut up in my bones" (Jeremiah 20:9).

This is the time to make a sacred resolution to follow the apostles and the prophets, to seek the Holy Ghost, and to testify and qualify to see the Master's face.

It has been my experience that fasting, prayer, study, and pondering are essential. Equally important is service. We must follow the pattern Christ modeled for us. King Benjamin said:

 

And behold, I tell you these things that ye may learn wisdom; that ye may learn that when ye are in the service of your fellow beings ye are only in the service of your God. [Mosiah 2:17]

 This is a great talk in its entirety.

 

In the Old Testament the Lord told Israel that there would someday be a new covenant—a new relationship between God and his chosen people—superior to that offered through the law of Moses. (See Jer. 31:31-33.) That promise was fulfilled when the covenant of the gospel superseded the covenant of Sinai at the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. Like the old covenant, this new and everlasting covenant also has a sacrificial victim—Jesus Christ himself, "the Lamb of God" (John 1:29) and "the Lamb that was slain" (Rev. 5:6, 9, 12). The blood of Jesus Christ, shed in Gethsemane and upon the cross, is the blood of the new covenant that, as it was shed, rendered the agreement valid and binding. (See Luke 22:20; 1 Cor. 11:25.) fn

 

(Stephen E. Robinson, Believing Christ: The Parable of the Bicycle and Other Good News [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1992],.)

 

 

Why do we say it has been made so far only to a limited degree? Because, as the holy word affirms, it involves more than the mere receipt of the gospel. A covenant, to have full force and validity, must be accepted in full both by God in heaven and by man on earth. The grand part of the covenant is this: "They shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the Lord: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more." (Jeremiah 31:31-34.) As Joseph Smith taught in his great sermon on the Second Comforter, this promise has reference to the receipt of that added Comforter, which means that they have the personage of Jesus Christ to attend them and to appear unto them from time to time. Those so blessed are the ones who remain after the destruction of the wicked at the ushering in of the Millennium. (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p. 149.) That is to say, the complete fulfillment is Millennial.

 

The prophetic word speaks of Israel, of the remnants of that once-favored people who are now scattered in all the nations of the earth, of the literal seed of the bodies of the prophets of old; it says that these—the descendants of the ancients—shall be gathered. Of this there is no question. But what of the Gentiles in the last days? Is not the gospel for them also? In answer we ask: What of the Gentiles in the days of ancient Israel? Were they not the children of the Father of us all? And did not the Lord offer salvation to them as he did to his chosen seed? The answer is that the eternal blessings were offered preferentially to the seed of Jacob, but that the strangers within Israel's gates were invited to come also and partake of the blessings promised the faithful. In dedicating the temple in his day, Solomon prayed that the blessings of Israel might also rest upon the strangers among them, provided those who were alien to Israel sought the Lord and kept his commandments. And so it is today, and so it is with reference to the gathering of Israel. There is to be also a gathering of the Gentiles, and all the Gentiles who gather with Israel by accepting and living the gospel shall be adopted into the house of Israel and shall rise up and bless Abraham as their father.

 

 

(Bruce R. McConkie, A New Witness for the Articles of Faith [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1985], 549.)

 

 

 

 

Last of Jeremiah

 

November 2, 2006

 

 

Bruce spent the opening of the class reviewing Elder Bednar’s devotional talk on the gathering.  It was a powerful talk.  It is a miracle to live in the time period we now enjoy.  The world is clueless to what is happening to prepare for the Millennium.

 

 

The Spirit and Purposes of Gathering

Elder David A. Bednar

Brigham Young University–Idaho Devotional

October 31, 2006

 

Sister Bednar and I are grateful to be back on campus with you this afternoon. We love you.

My general authority colleagues who are assigned to speak at BYU–Idaho devotionals often ask me if I have any advice for them as they prepare their messages. My answer is always the same.

Do not underestimate the students at Brigham Young University–Idaho. Those young people will come to the devotional eager to worship and to learn the basic doctrines of the restored gospel. Those young men and women will come to the devotional with their scriptures in hand and ready to use them. They will come to the devotional prepared to seek learning by study and also by faith. Treat and teach those young men and women as who they really are.


This afternoon I will take my own advice. During the time Sister Bednar and I served here in Rexburg, I often said from this pulpit that the greatest compliment I could give you as students is to treat you and to teach you as who you are pirit sons and daughters of our Heavenly Father with a particular and important purpose to fulfill in these latter days. I now plead and pray for the Holy Ghost to assist me and you as together we discuss the spirit and purposes of gathering.

We are met together today to participate in the groundbreaking for two buildings on this campus—the addition to the Manwaring Center and the new auditorium. I recall with fondness July 1, 1997, my first official day on the job as the new president of Ricks College. On that day we conducted a groundbreaking for the Spencer W. Kimball Building. Elder Richard G. Scott of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles presided at that event. Now remember, it was July 1, and it was my first day as the new president of the college. July 1—it was windy; it was very cold; and because of the inclement weather, we had to move indoors into the west ballroom of the Manwaring Center. Later that same day when I returned to the president’s home, I had to turn on the furnace because it was so cold. It was the first of July in Rexburg, and I had to turn on the heating system in our house.

I called Sister Bednar, who was in Arkansas at the time preparing for the move to Idaho, and described the historic events of the day. I also told her about how cold it was, and that I had turned on the furnace. There was silence on the other end of the phone. She simply said, “David, it is the first of July.” I responded, “Susan, I am in Rexburg.” Such are my memories of my first groundbreaking at BYU–Idaho.

Our gathering today is an important episode in the ongoing development of this Church sponsored institution of higher education. During the last decade, one of the most important educational events of the restoration has occurred in Rexburg, Idaho. And the physical evidence of that marvelous miracle is found in the new and renovated buildings across the BYU–Idaho campus. In just the last ten years the John Taylor, the Construction Management Lab, the Spencer W. Kimball, the Jacob Spori, the Radio and Graphic Services, the Gordon B. Hinckley, the university electrical sub-station, the Student Health and Counseling Center, the University Village, and the Thomas E. Ricks Buildings, were newly constructed. And the David O. McKay Library, the Joseph Fielding Smith, Dorm 5, the heating plant, the John W. Hart, the Mark Austin, the Ezra Taft Benson, the Thomas E. Ricks Gardens, the George S. Romney, the John L. Clarke, the Eliza R. Snow, the BYU–Idaho Stadium, and other facilities which I will not take the time to mention, have been renovated and remodeled.

Can you begin to sense the magnitude of the miracle—and how the hand of the Lord has enabled so much to be accomplished in such a short period of time? And the most important addition to the campus continues to rise majestically to the south of the Gordon B. Hinckley Building. We all look forward to the completion and dedication of the Rexburg Temple of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

The pace at and effectiveness with which these projects have moved forward defies rational explanation. I am personally grateful for the lessons I learned as these projects were conceived, critiqued, modified, and executed. The planning for and constructing of these new buildings and the remodeling of existing facilities on this campus has required faith, inspiration, persistence, and patience. I pay tribute to the good people on this campus who have labored so diligently and valiantly to make this construction miracle at BYU–Idaho a reality

The two buildings for which we break ground today represent the final phase of a comprehensive campus upgrade—the last major elements in the physical infrastructure of Brigham Young University–Idaho. These two projects are the largest and most complex of all the projects that have been undertaken thus far—in terms of both size and cost. And because of their sheer scope, it would be easy for us to “miss the mark” and think only in terms of the temporal purposes and uses of these two buildings.

We would be wise to remember that all things unto the Lord are spiritual, “and not at any time have I given unto you a law which was temporal; neither any man, nor the children of men (D&C 29:34). Interestingly, the renovated Manwaring Center and the auditorium will share a common spiritual purpose; they will both be primary places of gathering. The Manwaring Center truly will become a center for student association and activity. And the new auditorium will make it possible for the entire student body to attend together weekly devotionals, will enable more family and friends to participate in commencement and other significant events, and will meet a wide range of additional needs.


The Principle of Gathering

The gathering of scattered Israel is one of the fundamental principles of the restored gospel of Jesus Christ. The Lord gathers his people when they accept him and keep His commandments.

The Tenth Article of Faith states: “We believe in the literal gathering of Israel and in the restoration of the Ten Tribes; that Zion (the New Jerusalem) will be built upon the American continent; that Christ will reign personally upon the earth; and, that the earth will be renewed and receive its paradisiacal glory” (Articles of Faith 1:10)

Thus on a grand and global scale, the house of Israel is being gathered together in these latter days before the second coming of the Lord Jesus Christ. This supernal spiritual process variously is described in the scriptures as gathering out the wheat from the tares (see D&C 86:7), separating the righteous from the wicked (see Alma 5:57), dividing the sheep from the goats (see Matthew 25:32-33), and assembling the outcasts of Israel and gathering together the dispersed of Judah (see Isaiah 11:12). The spirit of gathering is an integral part of the restoration of all things in this the dispensation of the fullness of times. And as Elder Russell M. Nelson taught us in our recent general conference, the elect of the Lord are being gathered on both sides of the veil (see “The Gathering of Scattered Israel,” Ensign, November 2006, 79).

Using the scriptures, we will now briefly review several basic purposes of gathering, places of gathering, and blessings of gathering. The order in which these items are presented is not intended to reflect relative importance or priority.


Purposes of Gathering

First, what are the fundamental purposes of gathering? The Lord gathers His people to worship, to build up the Church, for a defense, and to receive counsel and instruction.

Purpose #1. To worship
“And there was one day in every week that was set apart that they should gather themselves together to teach the people, and to worship the Lord their God, and also, as often as it was in their power, to assemble themselves together” (Mosiah 18:25)

Purpose #2. To build up the Church
“Again, verily I say unto you, I will show unto you wisdom in me concerning all the churches, inasmuch as they are willing to be guided in a right and proper way for their salvation—

“That the work of the gathering together of my saints may continue, that I may build them up unto my name upon holy places; for the time of the harvest is come, and my word must needs be fulfilled” (D&C 101:63-64).

Purpose #3. For a defense
“And that the gathering together upon the land of Zion, and upon her stakes, may be for a defense, and for a refuge from the storm, and from wrath when it shall be poured out without mixture upon the whole earth” (D&C 115: 6).

Purpose #4. To receive counsel and instruction
“And it came to pass after many days there were a goodly number gathered together at the place of Mormon, to hear the words of Alma. Yea, all were gathered together that believed on his word, to hear him. And he did teach them, and did preach unto them repentance, and redemption, and faith on the Lord” (Mosiah 18:7).


Places of Gathering

What are the primary places of gathering? The Lord’s people are gathered into His restored Church, into holy temples, into stakes of Zion, and into families.

Place #1. Into the Lord’s restored Church
“That the work of the gathering together of my saints may continue, that I may build them up unto my name upon holy places; for the time of harvest is come, and my word must needs be fulfilled.

“Therefore, I must gather together my people, according to the parable of the wheat and the tares, that the wheat may be secured in the garners to possess eternal life, and be crowned with celestial glory, when I shall come in the kingdom of my Father to reward every man according as his work shall be” (D&C 101:64-65).

Place #2. Into holy temples
“Behold, the field was ripe, and blessed are ye, for ye did thrust in the sickle, and did reap with your might, yea, all the day long did ye labor; and behold the number of your sheaves! And they shall be gathered into the garners, that they are not wasted.

Please note that President Howard W. Hunter taught that the garners are the holy temples (see Church News, 17 September 1994). This interpretation by President Hunter adds additional clarity about the importance of sacred temple covenants and ordinances, that the sheaves are not wasted.

“Yea, they shall not be beaten down by the storm at the last day; yea, neither shall they be harrowed up by the whirlwinds; but when the storm cometh they shall be gathered together in their place, that the storm cannot penetrate to them; yea, neither shall they be driven with fierce winds whithersoever the enemy listeth to carry them” (Alma 26:5-6).

The Prophet Joseph Smith declared that in all ages the divine purpose of gathering is to build temples so that the Lord’s children can receive the highest ordinances and thereby gain eternal life (see TPJS, pp. 307-308, 314).

Place #3. Into stakes of Zion
“We ask thee to appoint unto Zion other stakes besides this one which thou hast appointed, that the gathering of thy people may roll on in great power and majesty, that thy work may be cut short in righteousness” (D&C 109:59).

Place #4. Into families
And most significantly, by the power of the Melchizedek priesthood and through the ordinances of the Holy Temple, we are gathered into families that can endure beyond the grave.

“And it came to pass that when they came up to the temple, they pitched their tents round about, every man according to his family, consisting of his wife, and his sons, and his daughters, and their sons, and their daughters, from the eldest down to the youngest, every family being separate one from another” (Mosiah 2:5).


Blessings of Gathering

Finally, what are the blessings of gathering? The gathering of the Lord’s people brings blessings of edification, preservation, and strength.

Blessing #1. Edification
“For the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ:

“Till we all come in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ” (Ephesians 4:12-13).

Blessing #2. Preservation
“And the day shall come that the earth shall rest, but before that day the heavens shall be darkened, and a veil of darkness shall cover the earth; and the heavens shall shake, and also the earth; and great tribulations shall be among the children of men, but my people will I preserve” (Moses 7:61).

Blessing #3. Strength
“For Zion must increase in beauty, and in holiness; her borders must be enlarged; her stakes must be strengthened; yea, verily I say unto you, Zion must arise and put on her beautiful garments” (D&C 82:14).

These blessings associated with the spirit and purposes of gathering will be increasingly evident throughout your life.


The Principle of Gathering at Brigham Young University–Idaho

The spirit, purposes, and blessings of gathering also occur in smaller but equally important ways on this set apart and special campus. The power of righteous unity can pervade your classrooms, your home evening groups, the weekly devotionals, among students studying in the library, and in student wards and stakes. This spirit of gathering brings assurance, encouragement, and a sense of purpose greater than self. At BYU–Idaho you gather to worship the Father in the name of the Son, to build up the Church and the university, to find defense and protection, and to receive counsel and instruction.

You gather together to learn and to prepare for your mortal and eternal opportunities and responsibilities. You gather together to strengthen each other. You gather together to develop appropriate relationships and to create eternal families. You gather together to increase in understanding about the purpose and measure of your creation.

You are richly blessed to be students gathered together on the campus of BYU–Idaho. In September of 1997, President James E. Faust, second counselor in the First Presidency, came to this campus to dedicate the John Taylor Building. Elder Henry B. Eyring of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles and the Commissioner of Church Education was President Faust’s companion for that assignment.

Elder Eyring arrived in Rexburg one day early to review several university issues with me and to ensure that everything was in order for President Faust. When I picked up Elder Eyring at the airport, I learned that he had just returned from a two-week assignment in South America. He obviously was tired from his travels, and I was anxious to get him to our home so he could rest.

As we drove to our home, I asked Elder Eyring if he was interested in quickly walking through the completed Taylor Building. He answered that he was interested, and we spent approximately 15 minutes inspecting the classrooms and other facilities.

Our last stop was the Taylor Chapel where Elder Eyring stood near the pulpit on the stand and gazed into the audience area for quite a long time. After a few minutes, I asked him: “Elder Eyring, what are you thinking about?” He answered with this profound and penetrating observation: “I am thinking about how much we do for so few and how little we do for so many.” He then continued, “The tithing of the people I just visited in South America and from good people all over the world paid for this facility. And most of the people who have made this beautiful facility possible will never see or step foot in a building like this. That is what I am thinking about.” That experience influenced me in an important way during the time I served here at BYU–Idaho. And now as a colleague of Elder Eyring in the Quorum of the Twelve, I understand more completely what he meant.

Sister Bednar and I returned last week from an assignment in Slovakia and Hungary. The people with whom we met in those countries will likely never see or step foot in the remodeled Manwaring Center or the new auditorium. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has invested millions of tithing dollars to upgrade the BYU–Idaho campus. These expenditures have been made to provide associations and places wherein you can learn about, gain experience with, and be blessed by the spirit of gathering. Please do not take these sacred resources, your choice associations, and this beautiful campus for granted. Please do not think that you are somehow more deserving or worthy. Please do not allow yourself to get fussy and grumpy because you do not have everything you believe you should have—such as a parking space within 200 feet of the building where you work or where your next class is held. Please be grateful for the singular opportunity you have to learn and work here—and for the responsibility that rests upon you as one who has been the recipient of great blessings.


A Warning and A Promise

In the authority of the holy Apostleship, I now raise a voice of warning and make a solemn promise. If the day ever were to come that intellectual arrogance, a lack of appreciation, and a spirit of demanding entitlement take root on this campus—among the students, faculty, employees or the administration, or within the community—then in that day the Spirit of Ricks will be well on the way to being extinguished—and the heavenly influence and blessings that have prospered this institution and the people associated with it will be withdrawn. Conversely, as long as intellectual modesty, humility, gratitude, obedience, and frugality continue to characterize those who learn and serve at BYU–Idaho, then this university will shine forth ever brighter as a beacon of righteousness and of inspired educational innovation.


My Witness

I declare my special witness that Jesus is the Christ and that the fullness of His gospel has been restored to the earth in these latter days through the Prophet Joseph Smith. I know and witness that the Savior lives. He stands at the head of His Church, and He directs its affairs through revelation to a living prophet. I so witness in the sacred name of Jesus Christ, amen.

© 2000 Intellectual Reserve, Inc.  All rights reserved.

Elder Bednar also closed the meeting by giving the closing prayer.

 

 

Bruce said we will close out the book of Jeremiah tonight and next week we will begin the book of Ezekiel.  These two prophets stood as witnesses to the destruction of the kingdom of Judah.

 

The book of Jeremiah is not in chronological order, whoever put the book together jumped around with the events and stories.  But that’s OK, can you imagine Jeremiah’s life as a mini series!?

 

34:1-22 The word which came unto Jeremiah from the Lord, when Nebuchadnezzar . . . and all his army, and all the kingdoms of the earth of his dominion, and all the people, fought against Jerusalem, and against all the cities thereof

 

These are prophetic words and political actions from the last days of Jerusalem, 588 to 586 B.C. Jeremiah gave the king one more warning and promise as the siege was being prepared against his fortress cities—Jerusalem, Lachish, and Azekah. The king and people were by that time fearful enough that they made a token repentance, freeing their fellow Hebrews who were in bondage to them, as the law of Moses required. Society had become polarized into the rich and the poor. If a poor family could not pay their rent and taxes, part or all of the family could be taken into servitude for the debt.

 

Then Jerusalem had a little respite from the siege when Babylon heard that Egypt was sending an army to oppose their further advance. It may have been this respite that permitted the rich and powerful in Jerusalem to void their repentant acts and take their servants back (Jer. 34:1-16; 37:5; Ex. 21:1-6; Deut. 15:7-15). Consequently, a more stringent prophecy was issued by the Lord through the prophet, who declared, ironically, "Behold, I proclaim a liberty for you": they would have liberty from serving the Lord and would go "to the sword, to the pestilence, and to the famine." Alluding to the covenant of Abraham under which they should have been living, the Lord declared that His protection of them was voided; Judah would be "a desolation without an inhabitant" (Jer. 34:16-22, 18a-b).

 

35:1-19 The word which came unto Jeremiah from the Lord in the days of Jehoiakim . . . saying, Go unto the house of the Rechabites, and speak unto them (This is a story of a righteous, obedient people versus the disobedient folks of Judah, quite a contrast!)

 

This revelation came much earlier than those preceding (see Jer. 27, which records a revelation from Jehoiakim's time).

 

The Rechabites, here presented as an example for Judah, were descendants of Hobab, the brother-in-law of Moses. He served as a guide to Israel in the wilderness, and his people were given an inheritance in the promised land with Israel. The Druze people of Lebanon, Syria, and Israel have traditions connecting them back to those ancient people (Jer. 35:2Jer. 35:2a; BD, "Kenites").

 

The Rechabites' exemplary behavior was their obedience to the teachings of the law and of their forefathers. They would not drink wine, even wine offered them in the temple. They had abandoned their traditional tents and come to Jerusalem because of the Babylonian threat; but on account of their integrity, they were given a prophetic promise of preservation.

 

In contrast, neither northern Israel nor Judah had kept the law, nor had they hearkened to the prophetic messages from the Lord. They had therefore forfeited divine protection and were doomed to exile in Babylon.

 

36:1-32 in the fourth year of Jehoiakim . . . this word came unto Jeremiah from the Lord, saying, Take thee a roll of a book, and write therein all the words that I have spoken unto thee against Israel, and against Judah, and against all the nations, . . . from the days of Josiah, even unto this day

 

This event is also from an earlier time. The fourth year of Jehoiakim would have been about 605 B.C. This chapter provides an example of the way Jeremiah's revelations and historical sketches were written and preserved (TG, "Scriptures, Writing of"; "Scriptures, Preservation of"; BD, "Canon). It tells that the prophet used the services of a scribe and indicates the materials used; it also shows the period covered by his writings to this point—about twenty-three years (Jer. 1:1-2; 36:1-2, 18). It tells the purposes of the prophetic writing and shows Jeremiah's situation as he dictated the revelations. It records the response of the servants and princes and the response of the king. Finally, it shows how the copies of revelations destroyed by the king were restored through the prophet.

 

37:1-21 And Zedekiah the king sent Jehucal . . . and Zephaniah . . . to the prophet Jeremiah, saying, Pray now unto the Lord our God for us

 

This incident and prophetic warning came in the days of King Zedekiah, at a time of a break in the Babylonian siege (ca. 588 B.C.; Jer. 35:2Jer. 35:1-5; 34:10-11). It seems surprising that the king would finally ask the prophet to pray in behalf of Judah; it is possible that he hoped the Babylonians would be beaten by the Egyptians and the temporary lifting of the siege would become permanent. Neither Judah nor the king was worthy of such a blessing, however, and the answer from the Lord was another condemnation and message of doom.

 

When the prophet sought a little respite out of the city, he was apprehended, accused of deserting to the enemy, flogged, and imprisoned. Oddly enough, when the king heard of the incident "many days" later, he sent for the prophet and secretly asked again for the word of the Lord. Even though the word was still that he would be overthrown by Babylon, he granted the prophet's request that he not be returned to the dungeon. Jeremiah remained in protective custody (with food provided) in "the court of the prison," where he was involved in events discussed in earlier chapters (Jer. 37:11-21; 32:1-2; 33:1).

 

38:1-28 Therefore the princes said unto the king, We beseech thee, let this man be put to death: for thus he weakeneth the hands of the men of war that remain in this city

 

Because Jeremiah continued to assert that the Lord would not save Jerusalem and Judah from Babylon and that anyone who wanted to survive must surrender, the leaders insisted that he be put to death. This time King Zedekiah yielded to his evil counselors, and Jeremiah was put in a pit, possibly a cistern, with no water but only some residual sludge in the bottom.

 

The faith and courage of the Ethiopian Ebed-melech (which means "the king's servant"), is noteworthy, and his practical way of rescuing the prophet admirable. Miraculously, the king allowed the rescue, which must be attributed to divine intervention.

 

The pitiable king's last consultation with the prophet drew from him the same divine edict: unworthy of protection, he could only surrender. The promise was merciful, for he could thereby live and the city would not be burnt, but the king had no faith in that promise. He feared Jewish defectors among the Babylonians, despite the prophet's reassurances. The interview did end with a plan being made that would keep the prophet out of the hands of his adversaries until the city fell.

 

39:1-18; 40:1-6 In the ninth year of Zedekiah . . . came Nebuchadrezzar . . . against Jerusalem, . . . And in the eleventh year . . . the city was broken up

 

The commentary on another account of this event (2 Kgs. 25) gives some details of the tragic devastation of Judah and Jerusalem and demolition of the great temple there—the temple of Solomon, which had been there some four hundred fifty years.

 

Note again the fate of the leaders and of the king's family. In contrast to their fate, note that the poor, who had often been taken into servitude by the leaders and rich land owners, were given "the vineyards and the fields" by the Babylonian captain of the guard (Jer. 34:8-11; 39:1-10, 6b; 41:10; 43:6). The Babylonians treated the prophet well, as had been promised (Jer. 15:11); further details are given in Jeremiah 41.

 

Gedaliah, who was appointed by the Babylonians to rule over the Jews remaining in the land, was the son of the same Ahikam who had defended the prophet earlier (Jer. 39:11-14; 26:24; 40:2-5).

 

An earlier prophecy to Ebed-melech, promising him deliverance, is mentioned (Jer. 39:15-18).

 

The "testimony" of Nebuzaradan is noteworthy, as is his consideration for the prophet (Jer. 40:1-6).

 

40:7-16; 41:1-18 Then they came to Gedaliah

 

Gedaliah was accepted as the leader of the remnant of Judah, and he was fair and conciliatory; the Lord must have brought about his appointment by Nebuzaradan. Even Jews who had taken refuge in neighboring nations to avoid captivity gathered to him. Indeed, when told that an enemy had arisen to destroy him, Gedaliah was such a good and trusting man that he would not believe it (Jer. 40:14-16).

 

The wicked prevailed, however; with a false show of friendship, Elishama "of the seed royal," with some princes, ate with Gedaliah and then rose up to slay him. All who were with him, and even some who were coming to worship at the ruins of the house of the Lord, were ruthlessly slain.

 

Nothing is known of the pit "which Asa the king had made," though it may have been part of that good king's defenses of Jerusalem (1 Kgs. 15:21-23). Whatever it was, it gave the assassins time to escape detection for a while. The royalist Ishmael even seized the surviving daughters of King Zedekiah but did not harm them (Jer. 41:10a). The true friends of Gedaliah were unable to catch the killers, but they did rescue those who had been taken captive. It is understandable but unfortunate that the survivors chose to go to Egypt for refuge (Jer. 41:11-18; Jer. 42).

 

42:1-22 pray for us unto the Lord thy God, even for all this remnant . . . That the Lord thy God may shew us the way wherein we may walk, and the thing that we must do

 

Johanan and Jezaniah, who had been faithful friends to Gedaliah, appeared to be humble, faithful, and receptive to divine guidance when they asked counsel of the Lord through the prophet; but Jeremiah knew their minds and asked for their promise that they would do what the Lord directed. They said, perhaps intentionally, "pray to the Lord thy God," but he countered, "I will pray unto the Lord your God" (Jer. 42:1-6).

 

The counsel came that they should not take refuge in Egypt but trust the Lord's promises of safety and mercy in Judah and strongly warned against their plan to flee. The Lord and the prophet knew that Johanan and Jezaniah had not sincerely asked for advice but merely desired consent or confirmation in doing what they had decided to do (Jer. 42:20). The prophet told them that they would die if they pursued their willful way.

 

43:1-13 Then spake Azariah . . . and Johanan . . . and all the proud men, saying unto Jeremiah, Thou speakest falsely: the Lord our God hath not sent thee to say, Go not into Egypt

 

Refusing to heed the revelation, the leaders and people chose to go to Egypt. They blamed the prophet's scribe, Baruch, for instigating Jeremiah's opposition to the move. Surprisingly, the prophet and his scribe were taken along by the refugees, as were "the king's daughters." They stopped at Tahpanhes, a fortified border town on an eastern branch of the Nile in the delta (Jer. 43:1-7, 6a). Though the translation is not certain about the meaning of the stones to be hidden outside the entry to the royal house there, Jeremiah's prophecy was essentially about Babylon's coming conquest. Egypt's armies, idols, and people would all suffer the invasion of Nebuchadnezzar (Jer. 43:8-13).

 

44:1-30 The word that came to Jeremiah concerning all the Jews which dwell in the land of Egypt

 

There were four places in which Jews already dwelt in Egypt; evidently many refugees had fled there before the little group that included Jeremiah. The revelation to them about their faults and sins is similar to a review of evils in Israel written a century and a quarter earlier, at the time of the fall of the northern ten tribes. It is evident that these exiles had not been faithful, were not humbled by their circumstances, and still refused to observe the divine laws (Jer. 44:2-14; cf. 2 Kgs. 17:6-23).

 

Far from being repentant, the spokesmen among them in Egypt were quite defiant and justified their wives in worshipping "the queen of heaven." They claimed that even in Jerusalem they had had more food when they sacrificed to her.

 

The prophet responded with a stinging reprimand of them and their forefathers for their idolatry and their perfidious justification of it. He essentially affirmed their excommunication from God and his goodness. Only a small remnant would return to testify of their fate. The prophet gave them, as a certification of his word, a prophecy that Pharaoh Hophra would be conquered by Nebuchadnezzar as Zedekiah had been (Jer. 44:20-30).

 

 

(Ellis T. Rasmussen, A Latter-day Saint Commentary on the Old Testament [Salt Lake City: Deseret, 1993], 566.)

 

 

The Siege of Jerusalem (Jer. 34-38) – Is this 2 different accounts of the same story, or a similar story told twice?  Zedekiah was a weak wimp without a backbone, he knew what was right but didn’t do it, it wasn’t politically correct!

 

The chief priests and Elders wanted Jeremiah dead, they thought he was a traitor, he always teaches doom and gloom against us.  But they didn’t kill him, Why?

 

In the course of the siege of Jerusalem (588-587 B.C.), Zedekiah had by a covenant with the people (Jer. 34:8) implemented the release of Hebrew slaves, who were to be freed at the end of seven years according to the Mosaic law (Ex. 21:2; Deut. 15:12). This covenant had been confirmed with a solemn oath ceremony in the temple (Jer. 34:15). fn But the people had broken their oath and forced the slaves back into submission (Jer. 34:11). fn

 

The Lord pointed out to the people that they had taken a step toward repentance with the declaration of liberty to their slaves—a repentance that could have led to their own deliverance. In response to their unwillingness to keep their recent covenant, the Lord responded with sarcasm: "Behold, I proclaim a liberty for you, saith the Lord, to the sword, to the pestilence, and to the famine" (Jer. 34:17). Jeremiah warned the people that the Babylonians would return (Jer. 34:22; 37:5-10) after defeating the Egyptians and would punish them for their unfaithfulness. The penalty of death was pronounced upon those who had broken this covenant: "Their dead bodies shall be for meat unto the fowls of the heaven, and to the beasts of the earth" (Jer. 34:20).

 

Following the incident of the Rechabites (Jer. 35), the burning of the scroll (chap. 36), and Jeremiah's promise of the Babylonian return (chap. 37), Jeremiah was delivered to the king and charged with treason and weakening the morale of the people under siege with his prophecies of doom (Jer. 38:1-5). The vacillating Zedekiah first turned him over to the princes who wished to kill him, saying, "He is in your hand" (Jer. 38:5). They cast him into a dungeon full of mire until his noble friend Ebed-melech, an Ethiopian eunuch, saved him and delivered him to better conditions in the court of the prison. There Zedekiah once again secretly consulted him, promising him his life if he would but tell him the word of the Lord. Wearily Jeremiah, perhaps for the last time, delivered the same message to Zedekiah: "Thus saith the Lord . . . If thou wilt assuredly go forth unto the king of Babylon's princes, then thy soul shall live, and this city shall not be burned with fire" (Jer. 38:17). Zedekiah refused the word of the Lord, excusing himself, "I am afraid of the Jews that are fallen to the Chaldeans, lest they deliver me into their hand, and they mock me" (Jer. 38:19)—a king who feared men more than the Lord.

 

The Fall of Jerusalem and Its Aftermath (Jer. 39-41) – The Ethiopian eunuch showed compassion on Jeremiah and was blessed for his heroic action in saving Jeremiah.  The Babylonians take better care of Jeremiah then the Jews did.  

 

In Jeremiah 39 and 52 we find recorded one of the major events of the history of Israel (see also 2 Kgs. 25). The destruction of the covenant people warned about by Moses (Deut. 27-28) and by each of the succeeding prophets finally came to pass. The cup of the wrath of the Lord (Jer. 25:15-38) was poured out upon his own people through the instrument of the enemy from the north (Jer. 1:13-16)—Nebuchadnezzar and the Babylonians.

 

A month after Jerusalem fell, Nebuchadnezzar ordered Nebuzar-adan, captain of the guard, to burn the temple, the royal place, and the rest of the city, and to prepare all but the poorest of the land for exile to Babylon. Nebuchadnezzar appointed one Gedaliah as governor over Judah. From a prominent family of Jerusalem, his father Ahikam and grandfather Shaphan had both served in King Josiah's court (2 Kgs. 22:3, 14). Gedaliah moved the capital north of Jerusalem to Mizpah (see Map 9, LDS Bible). Gedaliah promised his people that he would represent them well before the Babylonians if they would submit, and he urged them to begin immediately to harvest what they could of their crops (Jer. 40:9-10). In the seventh month fn a malcontent from the royal family, Ishmael (2 Kgs. 25:25), conspired against Gedaliah and killed him, along with the Jews and the Babylonians present at the court in Mizpah (Jer. 41:1-4). Ishmael then proceeded to slaughter ruthlessly another seventy men before fleeing with hostages from Mizpah to the Ammonites (Jer. 41:10).

 

Because Jeremiah had been an advocate of submission to Babylon, the Babylonians released him from the court of the prison, according to one account (Jer. 39:14), or from Ramah, according to another, where he was chained with the rest of the captives awaiting removal to Babylon (Jer. 40:1). fn The Babylonians invited Jeremiah to move to Babylon or to remain in his land as he wished. He decided to remain in Judah and immediately went to Mizpah to his friend Gedaliah, whose father Ahikam had once saved Jeremiah from death (Jer. 26:24). How Jeremiah escaped the slaughter by Ishmael is unknown. A short time after the death of Gedaliah, Jeremiah was forced against his will to accompany a group of Judahites to Egypt. Sometime in this period, if the tradition of authorship is correct, he would have written one of his final laments found in the book of Lamentations.

 

Jeremiah in Egypt (Jer. 42-44) – These are the 2nd chance people; those who were left behind, they started to act like those taken to Babylon. 

 

(Jeremiah 42:3-4.) – “Thy God turns to Your God” by Jeremiah, he is a teacher to the end.

 

3 That the LORD thy God may shew us the way wherein we may walk, and the thing that we may do.

 

4 Then Jeremiah the prophet said unto them, I have heard you; behold, I will pray unto the LORD your God according to your words; and it shall come to pass, that whatsoever thing the LORD shall answer you, I will declare it unto you; I will keep nothing back from you.

 

 

A group of Judahites, apparently worried about Babylonian retaliation for the assassination of the governor, besought Jeremiah to pray and obtain the word of the Lord for them and promised to obey this word "whether it be good, or whether it be evil" (Jer. 42:6). After ten days the Lord responded, "If ye will still abide in this land, then will I build you, and not pull you down, and I will plant you, and not pluck you up" (Jer. 42:10). The Lord went on to warn them that if in fact they did proceed to Egypt, as they had evidently been planning to do, "the sword, which ye feared, shall overtake you there in the land of Egypt, and the famine, whereof ye were afraid, shall follow close after you there in Egypt; and there ye shall die" (Jer. 42:16). The people, after consulting with "all the proud men," responded to Jeremiah, the prophet of the Lord, "Thou speakest falsely: the Lord our God hath not sent thee to say, Go not into Egypt to sojourn there" (Jer. 43:2). After all of Jeremiah's forty years of prophesying had been vindicated by actual events, these men still could not recognize the word of the Lord.

 

For some reason this group forced Jeremiah and his scribe Baruch to accompany them to Egypt, where they settled in Tahpanhes, a frontier city in the northeastern delta. There Jeremiah prophesied that Nebuchadnezzar would come and "smite the land of Egypt" (Jer. 43:11), a prophecy that was fulfilled in 568, when, according to a fragmentary historical text "in the 37th year, Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon marched against Egypt to deliver a battle." fn

 

In chapter 44 of his book we find Jeremiah, the prophet to the nations, delivering the word of the Lord for the last time, addressing all the Jews in Egypt. The message was a familiar one: "Ye provoke me unto wrath with the works of your hands, burning incense unto other gods in the land of Egypt, whither ye be gone to dwell" (Jer. 44:8). In a sense the children of Israel had returned home to the Egypt from whence Moses brought them, and they had taken their idolatry back with them. The Lord pleaded, "Have ye forgotten the wickedness of your fathers?" (Jer. 44:9). Apparently they had. Jeremiah faced a new generation, in another place, who because they would not listen to the same word would learn from the cup of the Lord's wrath, "For I will punish them that dwell in the land of Egypt, as I have punished Jerusalem, by the sword, by the famine, and by the pestilence" (Jer. 44:13).

 

(Jeremiah 44:28.) – A small remnant will return from Egypt

 

28 Yet a small number that escape the sword shall return out of the land of Egypt into the land of Judah, and all the remnant of Judah, that are gone into the land of Egypt to sojourn there, shall know whose words shall stand, mine, or theirs.

 

 

A Message to Baruch (Jer. 45)

 

Jeremiah 45, out of chronological sequence, identifies itself as the words of the Lord delivered by Jeremiah to Baruch his scribe in the fourth year of Jehoiakim, after Baruch had completed writing, or rather rewriting, the words of Jeremiah (see Jer. 36). Baruch is often in the background of the book, and in this short prophecy we get our only poignant, personal glimpse of Baruch's own sacrifice and suffering as he realized that Jeremiah's words of doom to Israel would affect his own life. The Lord said that he could offer no immediate comfort or relief from the terrible things that were then happening and that were soon to come about (Jer. 45:4). Those "great things" that Baruch would like to pursue for himself in his personal life would not be attainable. The only consolation the Lord could offer was that his life would be spared (Jer. 45:5). fn

 

Baruch remained faithful to Jeremiah to the end. The last we hear of him he was in Egypt, still recording the word of the Lord through Jeremiah. Perhaps the placement of this oracle at the end of the biographical material is the work of Baruch, who copied and edited those words, attaching his own personal oracle at the end as proof that the Lord had indeed spared his life and as evidence of his hand in the biographical section.

 

Historical Appendix (Jer. 52) – The poor in the city were taken, while the poor in the land were left to harvest.  This is the story of the destruction of Jerusalem and the surrounding cities in Judah.

 

It is fitting that the chapter describing the siege, capture, and destruction of Jerusalem and her temple and the ensuing exile is found at the end of the book of Jeremiah. Indeed, the Lord had "hastened his word to perform it" (Jer. 1:12). The destruction that Jeremiah had prophesied finally came about. Jeremiah 52 is almost a duplicate of 2 Kings 25 but adds some significant details to the historical events. Of particular interest is the account of a deportation in the twenty-third year of Nebuchadnezzar's reign (582 B.C.), presumably following the rebellion that resulted in the murder of the Babylonian-appointed governor Gedaliah (Jer. 52:30).

 

Throughout his ministry Jeremiah pronounced prophecies of comfort and hope for restoration. Although he told those in Babylon to prepare for a long stay, he promised that in seventy years there would be a return. The final note in Jeremiah 52:31-34 is dated "in the seven and thirtieth year of the captivity of Jehoiachin" and the first year of the reign of the Babylonian king Evil-merodach—a tactful reference to the death of Nebuchadnezzar in 562 (Jer. 52:31). It is recorded that Nebuchadnezzar's successor Evil-merodach, in the first year of his reign, released Jehoiachin, the exiled king of Judah, out of prison and restored him to a respectable lifestyle. This foreshadowing of the restoration of Judah in 539 would serve as a type of the establishment of the "new covenant" (Matt. 26:28) and finally the new and everlasting covenant (D&C 1:22).

 

A Lifetime of Commitment

 

Jeremiah exemplifies for us many important aspects of a prophet. He was a servant of the Lord called to deliver his word. Therefore, he had to remain throughout his life worthy to receive the word and be willing to deliver it. From the time of his call when the Lord first delivered his word to him until we last hear of him in Egypt, he faithfully represented his Master before his people. Throughout his life he delivered the word of the Lord to kings, princes, priests, prophets, his neighbors, the exiles in Babylon and Egypt, and to all nations. The message was two-fold: destruction and restoration—"to pull down, and destroy" and "to build, and to plant" (Jer. 1:10). To those children of the covenant who were unfaithful to the Lord, hope and mercy were extended on the condition of repentance. Unfortunately they rejected that message, and for the unrepentant there remained only judgment.

 

Forty years is a short time in the history of the world, but for Jeremiah it was a commitment of his whole life. Because of his faithfulness he suffered many trials and much affliction, and his entire life stands as an example of faith, obedience, and sacrifice.

 

The Lord promised Jeremiah from the beginning that he would "hasten" to perform his word (Jer. 1:12), and Jeremiah witnessed the fulfillment of many of his prophecies in his own lifetime—including the destruction of Jerusalem and the exile of his people. The fulfillment of these prophecies stands as a solemn witness to the certain fulfillment of the word of the Lord regarding building and planting in the days to come (Jer. 31:27-28), including the restoration of the "new covenant" (Jer. 31:31) and the gathering and reuniting of Israel and Judah (Jer. 30:3).

 

At one point in his life Jeremiah recalled the joy he once had found in his calling: "Thy words were found, and I did eat them; and thy word was unto me the joy and rejoicing of mine heart; for I am called by thy name, O Lord God of hosts" (Jer. 15:16). He then lamented the persecution and loneliness that resulted from delivering the words: "I sat not in the assembly of the mockers, nor rejoiced; I sat alone because of thy hand" (Jer. 15:17). The Lord responded with the promise he had made at the beginning: "I will make thee unto this people a fenced brasen wall: and they shall fight against thee, but they shall not prevail against thee: for I am with thee to save thee and to deliver thee, saith the Lord" (Jer. 15:20-21). The Lord protected and preserved Jeremiah until his mission was completed. As we study the life of Jeremiah, we begin to understand a man who trusted in the Lord rather than in the arm of flesh (Jer. 17:5-8) and one whose call was to sacrifice the approval of men in order to gain the presence of God.

 

 

(Kent P. Jackson, ed., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 4: 1 Kings to Malachi [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1993], 206.)

 

 

 

Greed and Fear rule these people, it takes over.  The Spirit has left these people, they are without hope.

 

 

 

Ezekiel 1-5

 

November 9, 2006

 

 

 

Elder Oak’s devotional this week – Sisters, don’t fall for the worldly urging that women should emulate men in various masculine characteristics.  That is not what the Lord created you to do.  Please don’t misunderstand me.  I am not saying that women should not be doctors or lawyers or any particular occupation that fits their circumstances.  To use lawyering as an example, what I am saying is that women should not attempt to be manly lawyers.  Nor should women emulate the worldly ways of womanhood.  Your destiny is to be a wife and a mother in Zion, not a model and a streetwalker in BabylonYou should dress and act accordingly.

 

Bruce read the BD concerning Lamentations and Ezekiel.  Ezekiel (God will strengthen) is the 2nd witness to Jeremiah to the destruction of Jerusalem; one could also call Lehi as a 3rd witness based on 2nd Nephi 1.

 

He is taken to Babylon 10 years before Jerusalem was destroyed. 

 

BIBLE DICTIONARY
Lamentations, Book of

 

Or, Dirges over the fall of Jerusalem and the nation. Written by Jeremiah. The poems are acrostic, chs. 1, 2, 4 having each 22 verses beginning with the successive letters of the alphabet; ch. 3 has 66 verses, every three beginning each with one letter; ch. 5 is not alphabetical. This beautiful little book is very instructive, e.g., in regard to the scenes in the city, and the feelings of the people, ch. 4; the deep impression made by the destruction of the holy city and temple by Jehovah’s own hand (Lam. 1: 21; Lam. 2: 1-11; Lam. 3: 42-44); the feeling of sin awakened by it and the deep sense of national humiliation. The date of the book must be some years after the fall of the city, of which the writer was an eye-witness.

Written as songs after the fall of Jerusalem, they are dirges, funeral songs.  Jeremiah was quite a poet, like Isaiah.

 

 

BiBLE DICTIONARY
Ezekiel

God will strengthen.

A priest of the family of Zadok, and one of the captives carried away by Nebuchadnezzar along with Jehoiachin. He settled at Tel Abib on the Chebar, and prophesied during a period of 22 years, 592-470 B.C. The book of Ezekiel has three main divisions: 1 1 - 24, prophecies of judgment against Jerusalem and the nation; 2 25 - 39, prophecies of restoration; 3 40 - 48, visions of the reconstruction of the temple and its worship. Chs. 1 - 39 are similar in manner and contents to other prophetic writings; chs. 40 - 48 are unique in prophecy.

Among the notable teachings of Ezekiel are chs. 3 and 18, which show the significance of a prophet’s warning and the individual responsibility of every person for the consequences of his own behavior; ch. 37, which depicts the valley of dry bones, each bone coming together, bone to his bone, in the resurrection, the restoration of Israel, and the uniting of the stick (record) or Ephraim with the stick of Judah; and chs. 47 - 48, the description of the latter-day temple in Jerusalem, the river running from the temple into the Dead Sea to heal it, and the building of a city “foursquare.” Ezekiel was a man of many visions and spoke much about the future restoration of Israel and the glory of the millennial reign of the Lord. The authenticity of his writings are specifically confirmed by latter-day revelation, as in D&C 29: 21.

 

 

THE PROPHETS OF THE EXILE: SAVIORS OF A PEOPLE

 

RICHARD D. DRAPER

 

 

Like Jeremiah, Ezekiel was a priest (Ezek. 1:3). That explains in part why he became one of Nebuchadnezzar's many hostages, the Babylonians concentrating on children of the gentry, clergy, and aristocracy. His captors would have taken him into Babylon about 597 B.C., with a group of Jewish exiles deported about a decade before Jerusalem was destroyed.<#>39 Because Jeremiah had been prophesying for more than ten years by that time, it is very likely that Ezekiel would have heard his testimony and caught the same fire. God called him to carry the message into the streets of the Babylonian captives as Jeremiah did in the streets of Jerusalem.

 

He used the prophetic `ot, rather exaggerated symbolic acts, as the means of drawing attention to his message. Among other things, he symbolized the coming fate of Jerusalem by drawing a picture of the city on a brick and then, while eating rationed foods, simulating a siege against it (See Ezek. 4:1-15).

 

A little later, he shaved off his hair and beard. That act alone, especially shaving his beard, would have brought him a great deal of attention. Men in both the Babylonian and the Jewish cultures wore beards, and the Jews viewed them as a sign of adult male vitality and glory.<#>40 The prophet's clean-shaven face would have startled those who viewed it. But they would have sensed his message, for the shaved beard symbolized a radical change in the state of affairs.<#>41 He did not leave his audience guessing as to which way affairs were going to change. One-third of his hair he burned with fire, another he hacked with the sword, and the last he scattered to the wind. He did retain a few strands, which he tied to the hem of his robe (see Ezek. 5:1-5).

 

This ritual act he followed with a stern warning. "This is Jerusalem," he explained, and because "she hath changed my [that is, God's] judgments into wickedness more than the nations," God "will execute judgments in the midst of thee in the sight of the nations." The judgment would be horrible, for "fathers shall eat the sons in the midst of thee and the sons shall eat their fathers; and I [God] will execute judgments in thee, and the whole remnant of thee will I scatter into all the winds." Underscoring the reason for such severe judgment, the Lord chastised, "Surely, because thou hast defiled my sanctuary with all thy detestable things, and with all thine abominations, therefore will I also diminish thee; neither shall mine eye spare, neither will I have any pity" (Ezek. 5:5-7,  9-11).

 

 Ezekiel clearly preached against the idea that the temple alone would save the people. He recounted a vision in which he saw the Lord's Spirit lift from the sanctuary, hover over the temple for a moment, and then depart to the east (see Ezek. 9:8;  10:18;  11:23). His message was both clear and simple: It was not the temple but righteousness that would be Judah's only shield. Where there was no righteousness, there was no hope.

 

 

(Sperry Symposium Voices of Old Testament Prophets: The 26th Annual Sidney B. Sperry Symposium [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1997], 100.)

 

 

 

A WATCHMAN TO THE HOUSE OF ISRAEL (EZEKIEL 1-24)

 

STEPHEN D. RICKS

 

No themes so thoroughly pervade the writings of the prophets as judgment and hope. Of the sixteen canonical "writing prophets," ten—Amos, Hosea, Micah, Isaiah, Zephaniah, Jeremiah, Obadiah, Ezekiel, Zechariah, and Joel—wrote about Israel's punishment and exile as well as future hopes of return. Without exception, each of these prophets who wrote in the pre-Exilic period reflected on Israel's exile. Among the Exilic and post-Exilic prophets—Jeremiah, Obadiah, Ezekiel, Zechariah, and Joel—the "scattering of Israel" was already an accomplished fact. Thus, if their works contain no explicit mention of Israel's exile, that is doubtless because it was presupposed by them. Unlike the Exilic and post-Exilic prophets Obadiah, Zechariah, and Joel, none of whom explicitly commented on the fact of the Exile, Ezekiel frequently reflected on the causes of the Exile and on Israel's future hope (Ezek. 1-24, e.g., 6:8-10; 11:16-21; 12:15-16). Indeed, the entire book of Ezekiel hinges on these two themes, and the book as a whole is divided, roughly speaking, between prophecies of judgment (1-24) and prophecies of Israel's future hope (25-48).

 

Unlike the two other major "writing prophets," Isaiah and Jeremiah, nothing is recorded about Ezekiel in the historical writings that have been preserved in the Old Testament (Kings and Chronicles), but few prophets have been more highly personal in their writings than Ezekiel. According to Ezekiel's own record, he was descended from priestly lines and was the son of Buzi, who is otherwise unknown (Ezek. 1:3), was born in the kingdom of Judah in the seventh century B.C., was taken by Nebuchadnezzar into exile with King Jehoiachin in 597 B.C., and was active in his prophetic calling in captivity in Babylon. If he was already functioning as a priest before being taken into Babylon as a captive, he must have been at least thirty years old at the time. Ezekiel's prophecies in chapters 1 through 24 reflect deeply on the theological implications of the Exile as well as on the religious situation of those who remained in Judah and Jerusalem. Following is an outline of the book of Ezekiel:

 

I. 1-3 Ezekiel's Prophetic Call

 

II. 4-24 Prophecies against Disobedient Judah and Jerusalem

 

III. 25-32 Prophecies against Foreign Nations

 

IV. 33-37 Restoration

 

V. 38-39 Gog and Israel

 

VI. 40-48 A New Jerusalem and a New Temple

 

Ezekiel's Vision, Prophetic Call, and Commission (Ezek. 1-3)

 

Ezekiel 1 through 3 contains an account of Ezekiel's call to be a prophet. Like the commissions of many of the prophets in scripture and in noncanonical writings (e.g., the Pseudepigrapha, Jewish writings dating primarily from the period between the two testaments), Ezekiel 1 through 3 contains a record of a remarkable "throne-theophany" vision of the heavenly realms, as well as several other regularly recurring features: a historical introduction, a divine confrontation, the reaction, the throne-theophany, the prophetic commission, divine reassurance, and the conclusion of the call. The prophetic call of Ezekiel in chapters 1 through 3 shows particularly close parallels to the calls of Lehi in 1 Nephi 1 and 2 and of Isaiah in Isaiah 6 and will be considered in conjunction with them. This call pattern may be schematized as follows (in the interest of space, only the examples from Ezekiel will be cited in the discussion):

 

Ezek. 1-3 Isa. 6 1 Ne. 1-2

 

1. Historical Introduction 1:1-3 6:1a 1:4

 

2. Divine Confrontation 1:4-28a 6:1b-4 1:6a – Face to face meeting with Jehovah, not a negative meeting

 

3. Reaction 1:28b 6:5 1:6b-7

 

4. Throne-Theophany 1:20-26a 6:1b-4 1:8

 

5. Commission 2:3-8 6:9-10 2:1 – Tell Israel what they don’t want to hear

 

6. Reassurance 2:9-3:2 6:6-7

 

7. Conclusion 3:22-27 6:11b-13b 1:18-20 – I included the 1st footnote as a reference for the above chart.

 

This chart, and some of the subsequent discussion, is based on the perceptive study by Blake T. Ostler, "The Throne-Theophany and Prophetic Commission in 1 Nephi: A Form-Critical Analysis," BYU Studies, Fall 1986, p. 72, though it diverges from that of Ostler at several points. I have eliminated one of the features given by Ostler in his chart, the "objection," which follows the "commission" in Isa. 6 but is absent from both the calls of Lehi and Ezekiel. Similarly, I have not included Jeremiah on this chart, because it represents an "auditory" rather than a "thronetheophany" type of prophetic commission; cf. Stephen D. Ricks, "The Narrative Call Pattern in the Prophetic Commission of Enoch (Moses 6)," BYU Studies, Fall 1986, pp. 97-105.

 

(Kent P. Jackson, ed., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 4: 1 Kings to Malachi [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1993],.)

 

1. The "historical introduction" usually contains short introductory remarks providing such background details as the time, place, and historical setting of the prophetic call. The "historical introduction" to Ezekiel's call provides not merely the year, but also the day and month of the vision: "Now it came to pass in the thirtieth year, in the fourth month, in the fifth day of the month, as I was among the captives by the river Chebar, that the heavens were opened, and I saw visions of God. In the fifth day of the month, which was the fifth year of king Jehoiachin's captivity, the word of the Lord came expressly unto Ezekiel the priest, the son of Buzi, in the land of the Chaldeans by the river Chebar; and the hand of the Lord was there upon him" (Ezek. 1:1-3). Similar dating is to be found in Ezekiel 3:16; 8:1; 20:1; 24:1; 26:1; 29:1, 17; 30:20; 31:1; 32:1; 32:17; 33:21; 40:1 (cf. Hag. 1:1; 2:1, 20). fn

 

2. In the "divine confrontation" either God, an angel, or some other manifestation of the divine appears to the individual. The "divine confrontation" (Ezek. 1:4-28a) unfolds in a manner unique in scripture, through a symbolic vision of the chariot with four wheels and of "the likeness of the glory of the Lord." This highly ornate, difficult, and puzzling passage has probably engendered more commentary than any other chapter in the Old Testament and has spawned a whole genre of mystical literature in later Judaism known as merkavah (chariot) mysticism. fn

 

3. In the "reaction" section the prophet reacts to his confrontation with the divine through words or actions reflecting awe, fear, or unworthiness. Thus, following his vision, Ezekiel reports that "when I saw it, I fell upon my face, and I heard a voice of one that spake" (Ezek. 1:28b).

 

4. In the course of the "divine confrontation," the prophet has a "throne-theophany" vision in which he sees God seated on his throne. In Ezekiel, the image of God seated on his throne is less direct than it is in the visions of Lehi and Isaiah: "above the firmament" is "the likeness of a throne, as the appearance of a sapphire stone: and upon the likeness of the throne was the likeness as the appearance of a man" (Ezek. 1:26). fn

 

5. In the "commission," the individual recipient is commanded to perform a given task and assume the role of prophet to the people. Ezekiel's commission is accompanied by a description of the people to whom he was being sent: "And he said unto me, Son of man, I send thee to the children of Israel, to a rebellious nation that hath rebelled against me: they and their fathers have transgressed against me, even unto this very day. For they are impudent children and stiffhearted. I do send thee unto them; and thou shalt say unto them, Thus saith the Lord God. And they, whether they will hear, or whether they will forbear, (for they are a rebellious house), yet shall know that there hath been a prophet among them" (Ezek. 2:3-5).

 

6. In the "reassurance" section of the prophetic call passages, God or his representative promises the prophet that he will be protected so that he can fulfill his call. Sometimes combined with the "reassurance" is some act that symbolizes God's protecting power. The prophetic "reassurance" in Ezekiel contains such a supernatural, symbolic act. Ezekiel was handed a book containing "lamentations, and mourning, and woe" (Ezek. 2:10), which he was commanded to eat. Amazingly, despite the book's content, it was like honey in taste, perhaps symbolizing that God's gifts, of whatever sort they may be, are sweet.

 

7. The prophetic call generally concludes with a statement indicating that the prophet begins to execute his commission. As we shall see below, although Ezekiel was disposed to preach to the people, he was constrained from doing so because of their wickedness.

 

The Watchman on the Tower (Ezek. 3:16-21)

 

After his initial call, Ezekiel sat overwhelmed for seven days (Ezek. 3:15). Ezekiel was called to be a watchman in the service of God, whose chief task it was to warn his people in accordance with the words God had given him (Ezek. 3:16-21; cf. 33:1-9). The image of the watchman derives from the role of the watchman on the wall of the city and refers to his role in warning against the approach of an enemy. Besides his role in guarding against the incursions of enemies, he was obliged to watch constantly for signs of fire or civil disturbance within the city (cf. 2 Sam. 18:24-27; 2 Kgs. 9:17-20). In Doctrine and Covenants 124 the image of the watchman is also used. There, the Nauvoo House is commanded to be built as "a resting place for the weary traveler, that he may contemplate the glory of Zion, . . . that he may receive also the counsel from those whom I have set to be as plants of renown, and as watchmen upon her walls" (D&C 124:60-61).

 

Ezekiel's main task as a watchman was to announce the imminent judgment of God upon Judah and Jerusalem, which then loomed on the horizon. Just as the watchman of a city is liable when he fails to warn its inhabitants, so Ezekiel would be responsible if he failed to warn Israel. If he warned the wicked of the house of Israel that they would die, or the righteous who turned from their righteousness that they would die, and they did not turn from their ways and died, Ezekiel had fulfilled his duty and was innocent of their death. On the contrary, if he failed to warn the righteous or the wicked so that they died without having been duly warned, then Ezekiel would be responsible for the spilling of their blood, and he would die ("their blood required at his hand," cf. 2 Sam. 4:5-12; Ezek. 18:20-32; 33:1-20; Judg. 9:24). Accountability for properly fulfilling one's stewardship was clear. The false prophets (about whom Ezekiel had much to say later) who failed in their responsibility to warn Israel, proclaiming "Peace" when there was no peace, would suffer the consequences of God's judgment of death (Ezek. 13:1-23; 14:9-11). Similarly, Jacob, in the Book of Mormon, wished to preach to his people in order that their blood "might not come upon [his] garments" (Jacob 1:19). Personal deliverance from punishment depends in part on whether others have been aided in being delivered as well: "Nevertheless if thou warn the righteous man, that the righteous sin not, and he doth not sin, he shall surely live, because he is warned; also thou hast delivered thy soul" (Ezek. 3:21).

 

From the time of his call until the fall of Jerusalem, Ezekiel was a virtual recluse in his house for what appears to have been seven and one-half years (Ezek. 3:24-27; 24:25-27; cf. 33:22). His dumbness seems to refer to a silence enforced by circumstances: "But thou, O son of man, behold, they shall put bands upon thee, and shall bind thee with them, and thou shalt not go out among them" (Ezek. 3:25). "They" and "them" in this verse seem to refer to other Jews in exile with him. Having been forced to silence, he was not responsible for their wrongdoing. The elders and people came to him to inquire from the Lord (cf. Ezek. 8:1; 14:1; 20:1; 33:30-33), and then he spoke only when the Lord opened his mouth to proclaim, "Thus saith the Lord God" (Ezek. 3:27).

 

Symbolic Acts (Ezek. 4-5)

 

Ezekiel 4 and 5 contain a series of acts symbolic of God's judgment on the city of Jerusalem. These symbolic acts follow a pattern: a command to carry out the symbolic act; a report of carrying out the symbolic act; and the interpretation of the symbolic act. Ezekiel 4:1-3 contains the first and third elements, the command and the interpretation:

 

Command

 

Thou also, son of man, take thee a tile, and lay it before thee, and pourtray upon it the city, even Jerusalem: And lay siege against it, and build a fort against it, and cast a mount against it; set the camp also against it, and set battering rams against it round about. Moreover take thou unto thee an iron pan, and set it for a wall of iron between thee and the city: and set thy face against it

 

Interpretation

 

and it shall be besieged, and thou shalt lay siege against it. This shall be a sign to the house of Israel.

 

Other symbolic act passages in Ezekiel that contain a command and the interpretation of the command include 4:8-9, 9-17; 5:1-17; 12:17-20; 21:11-12, 23-29; 24:1-14; 37:15-28. The passages in Ezekiel that contain a command, the report of the carrying out of the command, and the interpretation of the command are 12:1-11 and 24:15-24. fn

 

In the first symbolic act (Ezek. 4:1-3), Ezekiel took a tile, drew on it Jerusalem, and then sketched in forts, mounds, and battering rams—much as a Babylonian military commander might do. Thereafter, Ezekiel took an iron plate and placed it between himself and the tile with Jerusalem sketched on it, apparently as a symbol of the separation between God and the people in the city. The command for Ezekiel to "lay siege against it" (Ezek. 4:3) probably symbolizes the siege against Jerusalem. In the following verses (Ezek. 4:4-8), Ezekiel was told to lie on his left side for 390 days, corresponding to the number of years that the house of Israel would be punished. Thereafter, he was to lie on his right side for forty days, possibly to represent the forty years of captivity and exile of Judah. Others suggest combining the two numbers to make the sum of 430 years, which, if calculated from the time of Jehoiachin's exile in 597 B.C., would end at 167 B.C., approximately the year that the Maccabean revolt began and the Jews again exercised rule over the land of Canaan for the first time since 597 B.C. fn Details of the conditions that would prevail during the siege of Jerusalem are given in the next section (Ezek. 4:9-17), where bread is made with a mixture of grains, since there was no single grain in sufficient supply to make bread. Ezekiel was then commanded to take a sharp sword and use it as a barber's razor to shave his beard (Ezek. 5:1-13). A third of the beard was to be burned in the middle of the city that was portrayed on the brick (Ezek. 4:1-2), a third he was to strike with the sword all around the city, and a third was to be scattered to the wind. From the latter number he was to save a few hairs in his garment, presumably to symbolize members of exiled communities such as the one in which Ezekiel himself lived. Its interpretation is given later: "A third part of thee shall die with the pestilence, and with famine shall they be consumed in the midst of thee: and a third part shall fall by the sword round about thee; and I will scatter a third part into all the winds and I will draw out a sword after them" (Ezek. 5:12). Cutting off the hair itself represents the loss of personal identity associated with exile (cf. Isa. 7:20). fn

 

 

(Kent P. Jackson, ed., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 4: 1 Kings to Malachi [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1993], 267.)

 

 

Divine confrontation = a face to face meeting, it isn’t a negative connotation.

Rock and Fire are constant in these visions.  In describing the 1st vision, Joseph described the Father and the Son as enveloped in a “pillar of fire”, later he would cross out the phrase and replace it with “a pillar of light”.

 

Ezekiel 1-3 – The meaning of the vision revolves around the concept of God power and knowledge; He is everywhere and knows everything.  Even a slave in faraway Babylon, Ezekiel is known and loved by his Lord and God.

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 38:1.)

 

1 Thus saith the Lord your God, even Jesus Christ, the Great I AM, Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the same which looked upon the wide expanse of eternity, and all the seraphic hosts of heaven, before the world was made;

 

 

The Omniscience of an Omnipotent and Omniloving God

 

Few doctrines, save those pertaining to the reality of the existence of God, are more basic than the truth that God is omniscient. "O how great the holiness of our God! For he knoweth all things, and there is not anything save he knows it." (2 Nephi. 9:20.) Unfortunately, this truth is sometimes only passively assented to by individuals who avoid exploring it and coming to understand its implications. Later on, such believers sometimes have difficulty with the implications of this core doctrine—which connects with other powerful doctrines such as the foreknowledge of God, foreordination, and foreassignment. The all-loving God who shapes our individual growing and sanctifying experiences—and then sees us through them—could not do so if He were not omniscient.

 

The word omniscient has, at times, been used carelessly, unnecessarily blurring our understanding of this very fundamental attribute of God. We read in the Prophet Joseph Smith's Lectures on Faith that God is perfect in the attributes of divinity, and one of these is knowledge: ". . . seeing that without the knowledge of all things, God would not be able to save any portion of his creatures; for it is by reason of the knowledge which he has of all things, from the beginning to the end, that enables him to give that understanding to his creatures by which they are made partakers of eternal life; and if it were not for the idea existing in the minds of men that God had all knowledge it would be impossible for them to exercise faith in him." (Lecture 4, paragraph 11.)

 

Joseph Smith also declared, "God is the only supreme governor and independent being in whom all fullness and perfection dwell; who is omnipotent, omnipresent and omniscient." (Lecture 2, paragraph 2.)

 

God, who knows the beginning from the end, knows, therefore, all that is in between. He could not safely see us through our individual allotments of "all these things" that shall give us experience if He did not first know "all things."

 

Below the scripture that declares that God knows "all things" there is no footnote reading "except that God is a little weak in geophysics"! We do not worship a God who simply forecasts a generally greater frequency of earthquakes in the last days before the second coming of His Son; He knows precisely when and where all these will occur. God has even prophesied that the Mount of Olives will cleave in twain at a precise latter-day time as Israel is besieged. (Zechariah 14:4.)

 

There are no qualifiers, only flat and absolute assertions of the omniscience of God such as these: "The Lord searcheth all hearts, and understandeth all." (1 Chronicles 28:9.) The psalmist said that the Lord's "understanding is infinite." (Psalm 147:5.) "Now we are sure that thou knowest all things." (John 16:30.) "The Lord knoweth all things which are to come." (Words of Mormon 1:7.)

 

Mortals should not aspire to teach God that He is not omniscient by adding qualifiers that He has never used in the scriptures. Job rightly asked, "Shall any teach God knowledge?" (Job 21:22.)

 

The Lord could not know all things that are to come if He did not know all things that are past as well as all things that are present. Alma described God's "foreknowledge" of all things and said also that God "comprehendeth all things." (Alma 13:3; 26:35.) Indicating that omniscience is a hallmark of divinity, Helaman wrote, "Except he was a God he could not know of all things." (Helaman 9:41.)

 

The Lord Himself said that He "knoweth all things, for all things are present" before Him. (D&C 38:2.) We read, too, that "all things are present with me, for I know them all." (Moses 1:6.)

 

Therefore, God's omniscience is not solely a function of prolonged and discerning familiarity with us—but of the stunning reality that the past and present and future are part of an "eternal now" with God! (Joseph Smith, History of the Church 4:597.)

 

Most, if not all of us, have been momentarily wrenched by the sound of a train whistle spilling into the night air—and we have been inexplicably subdued by the mix of memories and feelings it evokes. Perhaps, too, we have been beckoned by a lighted cottage across a snow-covered meadow at dusk. Or we have heard the distant but drawing soft laughter of children at play. Or we have been tugged at by the strains of singing from a nearby church. In such moments we have felt a deep yearning, as if we were outside something to which we belonged and of which we so much wanted again to be a part. The impact has been brief, to be sure—but real!

 

There are spiritual equivalents of these moments. They seem to occur most often when time touches eternity. In these moments, we feel a longing closeness—but we are still separate. And the partition that produces this paradox is something we call the veil.

 

We define the veil as the border between mortality and eternity; it is also a film of forgetting that covers the memories of earlier experiences. This forgetfulness will be lifted one day, and on that day we will see forever, rather than "through a glass, darkly." (1 Corinthians 13:12.)

 

However, there are poignant reminders of the veil even now, adding to our sense of being close but still outside. In our deepest prayers, when the agency of man encounters the omniscience of God, we sometimes sense how provincial our petitions really are. We perceive that there are more good answers than we have good questions, and that we have been taught more than we can tell, for the language used is not that which tongue can transmit.

 

We experience this same close separateness when a baby is born, and also as we wait with those who are dying—for then we brush against the veil, as goodbyes and greetings are said almost within earshot of each other. In such moments, this resonance with realities on the other side of the veil is so real that it can be explained in only one way.

 

No wonder the Savior said that His doctrines would be recognized by His sheep, that we would know His voice, that we would follow Him. (John 10:14.) We do not, therefore, follow strangers. Deep within us, His doctrines do strike the promised chord of familiarity and underscore our true identity. Our sense of belonging grows in spite of our sense of separateness, for His teachings stir our souls, awakening feelings within us that have somehow survived underneath the encrusting experiences of mortality.

 

This inner serenity that the believer knows as he brushes against the veil is cousin to certitude. The peace it brings surpasses our understanding and certainly our capacity to explain. It is a serenity that stands in stark contrast to the restlessness of the world in which, said Isaiah, the wicked are like the pounding and troubled sea, which cannot rest. (Isaiah 57:20.)

 

But mercifully the veil is there! It is fixed by the wisdom of God for our good. It is no use our being irritated with the Lord over that reality, for it is clearly a condition to which we agreed so long ago. Even when the veil is parted briefly, it will be on His terms, not ours. Such partings of the veil happen, of course, but in private settings and often with instructions or needed reassurances to expedite God's work and always to reward faith—not to moot faith.

 

Without the veil, for instance, we would lose that precious insulation which keeps us from a profound and disabling homesickness that would interfere with our mortal probation and maturation. Without the veil, our brief, mortal walk in a darkening world would lose its meaning, for one would scarcely carry the flashlight of faith at noonday and in the presence of the Light of the world!

 

Without the veil, we could not experience the gospel of work and the sweat of our brow. If we had the security of having already entered into God's rest, certain things would be unneeded; Adam and Eve did not carry social security cards in the Garden of Eden!

 

And how could we learn about obedience if we were shielded from the consequences of our disobedience?

 

Nor could we choose for ourselves in His holy presence among alternatives that do not there exist, for God's court is filled with those who have both chosen and overcome—whose company we do not yet deserve.

 

Fortunately, the veil keeps the first, second, and third estates separate, hence our sense of separateness. The veil insures the avoidance of having things "compound in one"—to our everlasting detriment. (2 Nephi 2:11.) We are cocooned, as it were, in order that we might truly choose. Once, long ago, we chose to come to this very setting where we could choose. It was an irrevocable choice! And the veil is the guarantor that that choice will be honored.

 

Eventually, the veil that now encloses us will be no more. Neither will time. (D&C 84:100.) Time is clearly not our natural dimension. Thus it is that we are never really at home in time. Alternately, we find ourselves wishing to hasten the passage of time or to hold back the dawn. We can do neither, of course, but whereas the fish is at home in water, we are clearly not at home in time—because we belong to eternity. Time, as much as any one thing, whispers to us that we are strangers here.

 

Thus the veil stands—not forever to shut us out, but as a mark of God's tutoring love for us. Any brush against it produces a feeling of "not yet," but also faint whispers of anticipation when these words will be heard by the faithful: "Well done, thou good and faithful servant."

 

The veil (which is both the film of forgetting and the border between mortality and eternity) will, one day, be shown to have been a succoring screen for us earthlings. Were it possible to breach it on the wrong terms, we would see and experience, before we are ready, things that would moot much of the value in this mortal experience. Remember, we are being proven as to our faith and fitted for strenuous chores to be done elsewhere. To change the nature of this necessary experience by premature commingling would mean that we would not be suitable company for those we yearn to be with, nor would we be ready to go where they are ready to go, nor to do the things that they have painstakingly learned to do. There is no other way!

 

Since—unlike for us enclosed by the veil—things are, for God, one "eternal now," it is to be remembered that for God to foresee is not to cause or even to desire a particular occurrence—but it is to take that occurrence into account beforehand, so that divine reckoning folds it into the unfolding purposes of God. Thus, for those with faith it can be said as by Paul, "And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose." (Romans 8:28.)

 

The actual determinations, however, are made by us mortals using our agency as to this or that course of action. For these determinations and decisions we are accountable. The essence of agency will have been present (and later at the judgment will be shown to have been provably present); otherwise the justice of our omniscient Father in heaven (another perfected attribute) would not have obtained. (Alma 12:15.)

 

Our agency is preserved, however, by the fact that as we approach a given moment we do not know what our response will be. Meanwhile, God has foreseen what we will do and has taken our decision into account (in composite with all others), so that His purposes are not frustrated.

 

It is unfortunate that our concerns do not center more upon the correctness of what we do in a given moment—and less upon whether or not God's having foreseen what we would do then somehow compromises our agency. It is equally regrettable that our souls should be troubled at all because we cannot figure out "how" God does it, when it has been made so abundantly clear and on so many occasions that He does do it. In any event, this great reality of omniscience will happily operate even if it is for us an unexplained reality!

 

In so many ways, we rely upon rather than resent the predictability of other things in this second estate. Each spring planting, each sunrise, each beat of the heart, each contraction and expansion of the lungs—to these we scarcely give a thought. These are assumed by us to be "built in" features of our lives. Think of the chaos if it were not so!

 

Likewise, the life spans of planets, as well as prophets, are known to God; the former pass away by his word. (Moses 1:35.) To a suffering Joseph Smith, God said, "Thy days are known, and thy years shall not be numbered less." (D&C 122:9.) Such a promise could not have been made if all other things that bore upon the life span of Joseph Smith were not also known beforehand to God—in perfectness. God can see into the hearts of the malcontent even before they form a mob, just as He saw where civil rebellion in America was to begin. (D&C 87:1; 130:12.)

 

Rather than questioning God's foreseeing of "all these things" in each of our lives, this perfected quality in God should fill us with wonderment and send us to our knees. Worshipful acknowledgment of an omniscient God will cause us to cooperate in the stretching of our souls.

 

On a much lower level of significance, it is good that Mozart's contemporaries did not restrain him from performing and composing as a lad until they could understand why he was such a prodigy. We are blessed by unexplained mortal genius as it flowers; why not accept also that humankind is blessed in far, far greater ways by the genius of God!

 

There is simply no way to reconcile the doctrine of the omniscience of God with the notion of a god who is something less than that.

 

Unfortunately, the omniscience of God in the minds of some well-meaning Latter-day Saints has been qualified by the concept of "eternal progression." Some have wrongly assumed God's progress is related to His acquisition of additional knowledge. In fact, God's "eternal progression" (if one is nevertheless determined to apply these two words to God) is related to the successful execution, again and again, of His plan of salvation to redeem billions of His children throughout His many creations. President Brigham Young said there are "millions of earths" like this one. (JD 11:41.) Of this marvelous recurring and redemptive process that rolls forth on such a vast scale, God has said that "his course is one eternal round." (D&C 3:2.)

 

President Joseph Fielding Smith observed that God's progression "is in building worlds and bringing to pass the immortality and eternal life of man . . . not his intelligence or knowledge, or virtue, or wisdom, or love, for these things are, as the scriptures teach, in a state of perfection." (Church History and Modern Revelation, 1947, 1:169.)

 

Since we cannot fully comprehend any one of God's perfected attributes, we surely cannot comprehend them in the aggregate. But we can have faith in Him and in His attributes as He has described these to us. This is what He asks of us. We may say that this is a lot to ask, but anything less will not do.

 

Those who try to qualify God's omniscience fail to understand that He has no need to avoid ennui by learning new things. Because God's love is also perfect, there is, in fact, divine delight in that "one eternal round" which, to us, seems to be all routine and repetition. God derives His great and continuing joy and glory by increasing and advancing His creations, and not from new intellectual experiences.

 

There is a vast difference, therefore, between an omniscient God and the false notion that God is on some sort of post-doctoral fellowship, still searching for additional key truths and vital data. Were the latter so, God might, at any moment, discover some new truth not previously known to Him that would restructure, diminish, or undercut certain truths previously known by Him. Prophecy would be mere prediction. Planning assumptions pertaining to our redemption would need to be revised. Fortunately for us, however, His plan of salvation is constantly underway—not constantly under revision.

 

An omniscient God foresaw the modern establishment of Israel as a separate nation-state. Historians have since acclaimed the remarkableness of how the United Nations voted to establish the state of Israel with the support of both the United States and the Soviet Union. It was a narrow political space window through which necessary events quickly passed, leading to the official establishment of Judah once again in the Holy Land. But it was a space window that was soon closed.

 

The Lord foresaw the establishment two centuries ago of precious but imperative constitutional freedoms in the land of America, the host nation for His kingdom in the last days—the place where many of the events connected with the restoration could occur, and where He could establish His church without its light being snuffed out by a state religion or paganism. But a god who was not omniscient might have attempted to establish his restored church in beleaguered Lithuania.

 

The Lord's determination of timing is also tied to His omniscience. But even mortals can see through the glass of history "darkly." The readers, for instance, of Barbara Tuchman's highly researched book about the fourteenth century (A Distant Mirror) will note how that century included several plagues of the black death (in just one of these visitations death took one in three of all mortals living between Iceland and India); the interminable "hundred years" war; and peasant revolts that racked much of Europe. Hardly the century or the setting that the Restoration would require! It would also have been a century without printing presses—no time to bring forth the Book of Mormon!

 

A god who did not perfectly know his prophets—and indeed all his spirit children—might have selected a prominent nineteenth-century clergyman to receive the first vision, only to find later that the clergyman was bent on taming the truths he thus learned. In order to make these truths more acceptable to his fellow clergymen, such an individual might have excised such words as "none" and "all" from the message of that theophany in the grove in which the Lord described churches at the time of the restoration. (Joseph Smith—History 1:19.) The carefully and divinely selected receiver of that marvelous manifestation, Joseph Smith, had to suffer and die for repeating those divinely declared words. God's martyrs are not permitted great concern over public relations, for truth is a relentless taskmaster.

 

A god who is not omniscient would have had difficulty predicting two millennia beforehand the troubled conditions (including the ominous, multinational military convergence) that will occur in the Middle East in connection with the second coming of the Savior. (Zechariah 14:2; Revelation 11.) If He did not know all the factors and variables beforehand, those prophecies and all prophecies would come to naught. These final scenes of some of the difficulties in the last days, for all someone less than omniscient might know, could well end up being centered not in the Middle East, but on the island of Luzon.

 

If God did not know our predilections and our choices even before we made them, and had not planned accordingly, we might well have ended up having Joseph Smith born in Manchuria and the Book of Mormon plates buried in Belgium! A less than omniscient god would be more like the earnest but fumbling Caesars who dot the landscape of history than a living, all-knowing God.

 

Though His plans are known to Him, there is no premature exposure of the Lord's plans. This could bring unnecessary persecution upon an unready Lord's people. Further, a premature showing of His power and strength in support of His Saints could cut short the trial of our faith.

 

Where God has immersed His people for His purposes in larger events, we do not, therefore, always see secular history that confirms spiritual happenings. (See D&C 121:12.) For instance, there appears to be no conclusive secular record of Moses and the Exodus in Egyptian history. There is even some disagreement among scholars about which pharaoh was the pharaoh of the Exodus.

 

Human history has its limitations, but obscurity its usefulness.

 

Traditional discussions of omniscience ignore the fact that this attribute is much more than God's simply noticing and observing everything as it happens. It is a remarkable thing for God to notice every sparrow that falls. But God could be fully noticing and aware—and yet still be surprised, along with the rest of us. Yet the living God is aware of all things before they unfold. This supernal dimension of knowledge is a part of omniscience!

 

Because of His omniscience and foreknowledge, God is, therefore, able to see His plan unfold safely. If He were less than omniscient and did not, in fact, operate out of perfect foreknowledge, His plan of salvation would by now be in shambles.

 

The Father needed to know, for instance (and know long before assignments were given in the premortal world), that Jesus Christ would not break in Gethsemane or upon Calvary, refusing to yield up His special life. He needed to know that Joseph Smith could sustain all of the pressures that would be brought to bear upon him without coming apart. He needed to know that certain of the translations of the Book of Mormon would be lost and that substitute plates needed to be ready to fill in the gap. (Words of Mormon 1:6-7; D&C 3:10.) God even knew centuries before that the great restoring latter-day prophet would, like his father, bear the name of Joseph and not Walter. (2 Nephi 3:15.)

 

One might multiply examples of this foreknowledge which grows out of God's omniscience, end upon end. Suffice it to say, we are safe in knowing that one of the perfected attributes of our Father in heaven is knowledge. No wonder the Prophet Joseph taught that if men do not comprehend the character of God, they do not comprehend themselves.

 

God is never surprised (fantasy stories to the contrary) by unexpected arrivals in the spirit world because of unforeseen deaths. But we must always distinguish between God's being able to foresee and His causing or desiring something to happen, a very important distinction! God foresaw the fall of His beloved David but did not cause it. (See D&C 132:39.) Sending for Bathsheba was David's decision, and even her battle-weary husband Uriah's sleeping loyally by David's door was not enough to bring a by then devious and determined David to his senses. (2 Samuel 11:9.)

 

By foreseeing, God can plan and His purposes can be fulfilled, but He does this in a way that does not in the least compromise our individual free agency, any more than an able meteorologist causes the weather rather than forecasts it. Part of the reason for this is our forgetfulness of our earlier experiences and the present inaccessibility of the knowledge and understanding we achieved there. The basic reason, of course, is that, as we decide and act, we do not know what God knows. Our decisions are made in our context, not His.

 

This mortal probation (of which the Gods said before we came here, "Let us prove them herewith") is, therefore, a perfectly arranged test. We will all end up kneeling and saying to God that He has been perfect in His justice and His mercy. In fact, we will acknowledge that we deserve the reward, or lack of it, which we one day will receive!

 

Perhaps it helps to emphasize—more than we sometimes do—that our first estate featured learning of a cognitive type, and it was surely a much longer span than that of our second estate, and the tutoring so much better and more direct.

 

The second estate, however, is one that emphasizes experiential learning through applying, proving, and testing. We learn cognitively here too, just as a good university examination also teaches even as it tests us. In any event, the books of the first estate are now closed to us, and the present test is, therefore, very real. We have moved, as it were, from first-estate theory to second-estate laboratory. It is here that our Christlike characteristics are further shaped and our spiritual skills are thus strengthened.

 

Such a transition in emphasis understandably produces genuine anxiety, for to be "proved herewith" suggests a stern test, a test that must roll forward to completion or else all that has been invested up to that point would be at risk.

 

Some find the doctrines of the omniscience and foreknowledge of God troubling because these seem, in some way, to constrict their individual agency. This concern springs out of a failure to distinguish between how it is that God knows with perfection what is to come but that we do not know, thus letting a very clear and simple doctrine get obscured by our own finite view of things.

 

Personality patterns, habits, strengths, and weaknesses observed by God over a long period in the premortal world would give God a perfect understanding of what we would do under a given set of circumstances—especially when He knows the circumstances to come. Just because we cannot compute all the variables, just because we cannot extrapolate does not mean that He cannot do so. Omniscience is, of course, one of the essences of Godhood; it sets Him apart in such an awesome way from all of us even though, on a smaller scale, we manage to do a little foreseeing ourselves at times with our own children even with our rather finite and imperfect minds.

 

Ever to be emphasized, however, is the reality that God's "seeing" is not the same thing as His "causing" something to happen.

 

We must not approach God as if He were somehow constrained by finite knowledge and by time. A useful and illustrative episode is the one involving the prophet Elisha and his young manservant. The prophet could see that a surrounded Israel need not fear. (2 Kings 6:15-17.) The alarmed younger man had to have his eyes opened, however, so he too could see that while the mountain was hostilely compassed about with horses and chariots of the enemy, it was also filled with horses and chariots of fire. Thus, even though the prophet said to the young man, "Fear not: for they that be with us are more than they that be with them," he was still puzzled and doubting. Only when his eyes were opened could he see the reassuring reality. Often, so it is with us. We see dimly, or, as Paul said, "through a glass, darkly." (1 Corinthians 13:12.) Such is the relevance of seers. Such is the role of faith.

 

In a very real sense, all we need to know is that God knows all!

 

If one searches for still other reasons as to why the doctrine of the omniscience of God is a stumbling block for some, some of these are attributable to the democratic age in which we live with its inordinate efforts at equalizing everything, rather than achieving justice. The deification of man and the subsequent deep disappointment with man have both happened within decades of each other. It has been a time of terrible wrenching for the humanist and the optimist.

 

The dashed plans of mankind have led many people to a despair and disappointment with life and with themselves. Mortals then impute their deficiencies, somehow, to Divinity.

 

Yet was it not God who, from the beginning, reminded earthlings that the wisdom of men is foolishness? We are only discovering, afresh, what He has long told us about all man's puny efforts that do not rely upon Him. Mortals are fretting over the weakened arm of flesh, but God has told us for centuries to beware of those biceps!

 

This mortal shortfall not only results from the tiny databank men have accumulated—compared to God's—but it also occurs because of the quality and nature of such information as men have collected in that tiny databank. Mortals are, in fact, "ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth." (2 Timothy 3:7.) So much of the secular data men have accumulated is accurate, but ultimately unimportant. Even learning useful things has often diverted mankind from learning crucial things.

 

Furthermore, let us not forget that great insight given us about the premortal world. The ascendancy of Jesus Christ (among all of our spirit brothers and sisters) is clearly set forth. Of Him it was said that He is "more intelligent than they all." (Abraham 3:19.) This means that Jesus knows more about astrophysics than all the humans who have ever lived, who live now, and who will yet live. Likewise, the same may be said about any other topic or subject. Moreover, what the Lord knows is, fortunately, vastly more—not just barely more—than the combination of what all mortals know.

 

Even with the "brightest and the best," for instance, the current scientific competency in predicting earthquakes is a very inexact science. Scientists recently predicted a major quake along Alaska's coastline. When? Sometime in the next several decades. Rather indefinite as to when.

 

Prophecy, happily, springs from very exact knowledge in the mind of the Lord Jesus Christ and God the Eternal Father, and it is surely very exacting in our lives as we experience its fulfillment.

 

God's omniscience is not stressed herein merely to put man down. We are His sons and daughters, and it is good that we seek to be like Him, including becoming perfect in knowledge. But it is the mark of an apt pupil to recognize what he does not know and from whom he can learn more. We must not let our foolish pride insulate us from the reality of God's omniscience and the implications that flow from it, touching so many facets of our daily lives.

 

There is little doubt, for instance, but that a goodly portion of our pride proceeds from some assumptions we make about ourselves and our lives—assumptions that are at first soothing but very wrong. We think, for instance, that we "own" ourselves. It is perfectly true that our individual identity is guaranteed, that we are agents for ourselves, and so forth—but this truth, when it is torn away from other realities, gives us a very lopsided view of things. Without the ransoming atonement of the Savior, we would be stranded souls, doomed to die with no hope of the resurrection or of individual immortality. We were literally purchased by Jesus. (Acts 20:28.) Quite true, we do not yet have to acknowledge that reality, though someday we will. Nor are we now even forced to follow the conditions that the Purchaser laid down. So, in a sense, we are quite free to do as we please, just as if we were our "own."

 

But it is a terrible illusion, an illusion that will be shattered by His second coming and the judgment. Meanwhile, the illusion is kept alive because some want to believe it. The resistance to feeling owned spreads to our not wanting to be reminded of how very dependent we are upon God. If we do not come to know God and to love Him, this resentment of reality can become very real.

 

This illusion underwrites the false assumptions that we make about our time, our talents, and our possessions that each of us sees as "mine." We may even feel noble when we give of our time and means, and we are apt to be somewhat grumpy if anyone, especially a prophet, reminds us that all that we have belongs to God anyway.

 

It never quite strikes home to most of us that to give two hours in church or neighborly service would not even be possible if God did not give us breath itself from moment to moment and did not keep that tiny but marvelous pump, the heart, working from second to second.

 

King Benjamin's sermon about how God supports us from moment to moment as well as immediately blesses us (when we keep His commandments) was not designed to be a popular sermon in self-sufficient times like ours. For us to be called "unprofitable servants" and to be reminded that even our bodies are made of the dust of the earth that also "belongeth to him"—these are hard sayings that bruise our pride. (Mosiah 2:21-25.) Unless—unless, through humility and obedience, we can transform feeling owned into a grand sense of belonging, and being purchased into gratitude for being rescued, and dependency into appreciation for being tutored by an omniscient God, which He does in order that we might become more dependable and have more independence and scope for service in the future.

 

It is very fortunate that an omniscient God is likewise perfect in His love; otherwise He might not say to us, "This is my work and my glory—to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of man." (Moses 1:39.) Indeed, if God were omniscient and omnipotent and not also omniloving, where would we be?

 

Therefore, our childish concerns over being owned and over being too dependent upon Him would merely be amusing if such attitudes did not carry within them the possibility of tragedy. The myopic pride that fails to acknowledge these overarching realities and says, "I am the Captain of my soul," fails to see that "corporal of my soul" would be at least somewhat closer to the truth.

 

In sum, what we know of God and His attributes we learn from Him—directly and through His prophets. It is significant that in none of His direct pronouncements has the Father declared anything that suggests He is less than omniscient. Qualifying words simply do not appear! It is mortal speculation (which wrongly emphasizes that He is like us, rather than that we are to become like Him) that is the source of erroneous expressions that God is somehow less than omniscient.

 

Moreover, even the speculation that God would tell us that He is less than omniscient if we could but understand is in error; it quickly dissolves in the presence of another absolute trait of God—that He cannot lie. (Titus 1:2.)

 

When we assert mortal qualifiers about God's omniscience, even with seemingly good motives, it is but our attempt to democratize Deity, to pull God down; fortunately, His work and glory is to lift us up, and His is the work that will finally prevail.

 

Therefore, in order for us to develop trust in God to see us through all these things, we must have a measure of understanding about His nature, including His omniscience. The Prophet Joseph Smith said it was the first principle of real religion to know the true nature of God. (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p. 345.)

 

Jesus Christ said in His great high priestly prayer, "And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent." (John 17:3.)

 

The myopic and despairing soul-cry and question, "If there is a God, why does He permit suffering?" reflects a basic failure to understand the very nature of life with its components of chastening and suffering. And as for that question, it is not difficult to imagine who originated it, however understandably sincere some are who now raise it. The question strikes at the heart of Father's plan, because it comes from him who rejected that plan!

The future duties to be given to some of us in the worlds to come by an omniscient God will require of us an earned sense of esteem as well as proof of our competency. Thus the tests given to us here are given not because God is in doubt as to the outcome, but because we need to grow in order to be able to serve with full effectiveness in the eternity to come.

 

Further, to be untested and unproven is also to be unaware of all that we are. If we are unknowing of our possibilities, with what could we safely be entrusted? Could we in ignorance of our capacities trust ourselves? Could others then be entrusted to us?

 

Thus the relentless love of our Father in heaven is such that in His omniscience, He will not allow the cutting short some of the brief experiences we are having here. To do so would be to deprive us of everlasting experiences and great joy there. What else would an omniscient and loving Father do, even if we plead otherwise? He must at times say no.

 

Furthermore, since there was no exemption from suffering for Christ, how can there be one for us? Do we really want immunity from adversity? Especially when certain kinds of suffering can aid our growth in this life? To deprive ourselves of those experiences, much as we might momentarily like to, would be to deprive ourselves of the outcomes over which we shouted with anticipated joy when this life's experiences were explained to us so long ago, in the world before we came here.

 

Life is a school in which we enrolled not only voluntarily but rejoicingly; and if the school's Headmaster employs a curriculum—proven, again and again on other planets, to bring happiness to participants—and if we agreed that once we were enrolled there would be no withdrawals, and also to undergo examinations that would truly test our ability and perceptivity, what would an experienced Headmaster do if, later on, there were complaints? Especially if, in His seeming absence, many of the school children tore up their guiding notebooks and demanded that He stop the examinations since these produced some pain? There is, to use jargon from American higher education, no way to "CLEP" the examinations of the second estate; one learns by taking the full course!

 

Even in the context of acknowledging His omniscience, the chastening experiences of life are difficult enough for us to bear. We could not trust in the perfectness of God's judgment if we did not first know that He foresaw and carefully calibrated our chastening and learning experiences accordingly.

 

In order for "all these things" to make sense, we must come to understand that God has "all sense." Only then can we repose with confidence in His perfect love!

 

 

(Neal A. Maxwell, All These Things Shall Give Thee Experience [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1979], 6.)

 

 

(Ezekiel 1:26-28.) – Ezekiel’s Throne Theophany

 

26 ¶ And above the firmament that was over their heads was the likeness of a throne, as the appearance of a sapphire stone: and upon the likeness of the throne was the likeness as the appearance of a man above upon it.

 

27 And I saw as the colour of amber, as the appearance of fire round about within it, from the appearance of his loins even upward, and from the appearance of his loins even downward, I saw as it were the appearance of fire, and it had brightness round about.

 

28 As the appearance of the bow that is in the cloud in the day of rain, so was the appearance of the brightness round about. This was the appearance of the likeness of the glory of the LORD. And when I saw it, I fell upon my face, and I heard a voice of one that spake.

 

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 76:92-93.) – Joseph Smith’s Throne Theophany

 

92 And thus we saw the glory of the celestial, which excels in all things—where God, even the Father, reigns upon his throne forever and ever;

 

93 Before whose throne all things bow in humble reverence, and give him glory forever and ever.

 

Acts 7 – Stephen teaches about God appearing to man outside of the temple, verse 47.  Heaven is my throne; God is not confined to a building.

 

God knows what needs to happen to bring about His purposes.

 

The phrase Son of man is used more in Ezekiel then in any other book of scripture, the footnote in chapter 2:1 gives the explanation that the phrase is a Hebrew idiom meaning human and is not to be confused to the same title which refers to Christ.  In the New Testament (Greek) it is in upper case, there isn’t upper or lower case in Hebrew.

The Son of Man

 

In ancient literature, there are two senses in which the title Son of Man is employed: in a generic sense with the meaning "human being" and in a more formal sense, employed largely in later Jewish literature, referring to the one who is to come on the clouds of heaven to deliver the righteous from their oppressors, and to judge the inhabitants of the earth (Higgins 15-17; Fitzmyer 8, 20; Daniel 7:13-14; I Enoch chapters 37-71). In the Old Testament, it is almost without exception that the phrase represents the less formal of the two. One thinks immediately of the phrase used by the Lord to address the prophet Ezekiel (Ezek. 2:4Ezekiel 2:1-8; 3:1-10). In the case of his work, the prophet was addressed consistently by the Hebrew phrase ben-'adham, son of man. While there are those who have argued that it was this Ezekielic use of the phrase that stood behind its application to Jesus in the New Testament (Higgins 15-16), it is far more likely that the more formal sense conveyed in Daniel 7:13 lies closer to the meaning of Jesus' sayings about the Son of Man fn

 

I saw in the night visions, and, behold, one like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before him. And there was given him dominion, and glory, and a kingdom, that all people, nations, and languages, should serve him: his dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away, and his kingdom that which shall not be destroyed. Although most non-LDS scholars now accept the point of view that the critical phrase is to be translated with the indefinite article "like a Son of man" and not the definite one "like the Son of man" (Higgins 16, emphasis added; Bruce 130; the Revised Standard Version), the force is hardly diminished. For it is clear that this Son of Man was to be given "an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away," plainly underscoring the formal, divinely royal sense of the appellation. And it is this notion which stands closer to what we see noted about the Son of Man in both the Similitudes of Enoch and the New Testament gospels. Let us now take up the issue of the conception of the Son of Man as it appears in the Enochian literature and then turn to the New Testament.

 

 

(H. Donl Peterson and Charles D. Tate, Jr., eds., The Pearl of Great Price: Revelations from God [Provo: BYU Religious Studies Center, 1989], 58.)

 

 

(Ezekiel 2:1-10.)

 

1 And he said unto me, Son of man, stand upon thy feet, and I will speak unto thee.

 

2 And the spirit entered into me when he spake unto me, and set me upon my feet, that I heard him that spake unto me.

 

3 And he said unto me, Son of man, I send thee to the children of Israel, to a rebellious nation that hath rebelled against me: they and their fathers have transgressed against me, even unto this very day.

 

4 For they are impudent children and stiffhearted. I do send thee unto them; and thou shalt say unto them, Thus saith the Lord GOD.

 

5 And they, whether they will hear, or whether they will forbear, (for they are a rebellious house,) yet shall know that there hath been a prophet among them.

 

6 ¶ And thou, son of man, be not afraid of them, neither be afraid of their words, though briers and thorns be with thee, and thou dost dwell among scorpions: be not afraid of their words, nor be dismayed at their looks, though they be a rebellious house.

 

7 And thou shalt speak my words unto them, whether they will hear, or whether they will forbear: for they are most rebellious.

 

8 But thou, son of man, hear what I say unto thee; Be not thou rebellious like that rebellious house: open thy mouth, and eat that I give thee.

 

9 ¶ And when I looked, behold, an hand was sent unto me; and, lo, a roll of a book was therein;

 

10 And he spread it before me; and it was written within and without: and there was written therein lamentations, and mourning, and woe.

 

 

 

Reserving Judgment on Gospel Issues
Not Fully Understood


Bruce R. McConkie

All gospel mysteries become plain and simple and easy to understand once the light of heaven sheds its darkness-dispelling rays into the hearts and souls of sincere seekers of truth.

It is almost superfluous to suggest that those who seek the truth and desire understanding will, by instinct, reserve judgment on issues they may not understand (as, for instance, that Christ is both the Father and the Son; or that the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost are one God in a sense far greater than merely being one in purpose) until the mystery of godliness, on whatever point is involved, has been set forth in full.   (The Promised Messiah, pp.5-6)


LORD God = Jehovah Elohim “He is Gods” this name has a far deeper meaning which Elder McConkie alludes to. 

LORD GOD = Jehovah, as in the Old Testament, Jesus Christ, one with the Father, this isn’t as simple as we make it out to be. 

Ezekiel is using a different name for Jehovah.  We demean Heavenly Father when we say that Jesus Christ is the God of the Old Testament.  He is the Father of all, we don’t understand the role of Heavenly Father and we need to study this mystery.

Ezekiel 3:2-21.)

 

 Moreover he said unto me, Son of man, eat that thou findest; eat this roll, and go speak unto the house of Israel.

 

2 So I opened my mouth, and he caused me to eat that roll.

 

3 And he said unto me, Son of man, cause thy belly to eat, and fill thy bowels with this roll that I give thee. Then did I eat it; and it was in my mouth as honey for sweetness.

 

4 ¶ And he said unto me, Son of man, go, get thee unto the house of Israel, and speak with my words unto them.

 

5 For thou art not sent to a people of a strange speech and of an hard language, but to the house of Israel;

 

6 Not to many people of a strange speech and of an hard language, whose words thou canst not understand. Surely, had I sent thee to them, they would have hearkened unto thee.

 

7 But the house of Israel will not hearken unto thee; for they will not hearken unto me: for all the house of Israel are impudent and hardhearted.

 

8 Behold, I have made thy face strong against their faces, and thy forehead strong against their foreheads.

 

9 As an adamant harder than flint have I made thy forehead: fear them not, neither be dismayed at their looks, though they be a rebellious house.

 

10 Moreover he said unto me, Son of man, all my words that I shall speak unto thee receive in thine heart, and hear with thine ears.

 

11 And go, get thee to them of the captivity, unto the children of thy people, and speak unto them, and tell them, Thus saith the Lord GOD; whether they will hear, or whether they will forbear.

 

12 Then the spirit took me up, and I heard behind me a voice of a great rushing, saying, Blessed be the glory of the LORD from his place.

 

13 I heard also the noise of the wings of the living creatures that touched one another, and the noise of the wheels over against them, and a noise of a great rushing.

 

14 So the spirit lifted me up, and took me away, and I went in bitterness, in the heat of my spirit; but the hand of the LORD was strong upon me.

 

15 ¶ Then I came to them of the captivity at Tel-abib, that dwelt by the river of Chebar, and I sat where they sat, and remained there astonished among them seven days.

 

16 And it came to pass at the end of seven days, that the word of the LORD came unto me, saying,

 

17 Son of man, I have made thee a watchman unto the house of Israel: therefore hear the word at my mouth, and give them warning from me.

 

18 When I say unto the wicked, Thou shalt surely die; and thou givest him not warning, nor speakest to warn the wicked from his wicked way, to save his life; the same wicked man shall die in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at thine hand.

 

19 Yet if thou warn the wicked, and he turn not from his wickedness, nor from his wicked way, he shall die in his iniquity; but thou hast delivered thy soul.

 

20 Again, When a righteous man doth turn from his righteousness, and commit iniquity, and I lay a stumblingblock before him, he shall die: because thou hast not given him warning, he shall die in his sin, and his righteousness which he hath done shall not be remembered; but his blood will I require at thine hand.

 

21 Nevertheless if thou warn the righteous man, that the righteous sin not, and he doth not sin, he shall surely live, because he is warned; also thou hast delivered thy soul.

 

D&C 77:14. Ezekiel also was asked to open his mouth and eat the book that was given to him. The writing on both sides contained "lamentations, and mourning, and woe. Moreover he said unto me, Son of man, eat that thou findest; eat this roll, and go speak unto the house of Israel. So I opened my mouth, and he caused me to eat that roll. And he said unto me, Son of man, cause thy belly to eat, and fill thy bowels with this roll that I give thee. Then did I eat it. . . . And he said unto me, Son of man, go, get thee unto the house of Israel, and speak with my words unto them" (Ezek. 2:8-10; Ezek. 3:33:1-4, italics added). Eating the roll seems to have symbolized the Lord's way of causing Ezekiel to absorb the message written on the roll which he was then to give to the people. Thus, the initial charge: "Eat this roll, and go speak unto the house of Israel" (Ezek. 3:1). Similarly, John's book seems to contain the mission that he would undertake. As Elder McConkie stated, "That John labors in fulfilment of this commission is evident from the statement of the Prophet Joseph Smith, made by the spirit of inspiration in June, 1831, 'that John the Revelator was then among the Ten Tribes of Israel who had been led away by Shalmaneser, king of Assyria, to prepare them for their return from their long dispersion, to again possess the land of their fathers' (HC 1:176)." Fn

 

(Robert L. Millet and Kent P. Jackson, eds., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 1: The Doctrine and Covenants [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1989], 276.)


Ezekiel was called as a Watchman over the people; his was a voice of warning.  Don’t hold back, remember who called you to the work.  Like Stake Presidents and Bishops today, they are to help the saints come unto Christ, turn (repent) of our sins.  If they don’t warn us they will be held accountable before God.  They can save themselves and I can save myself by warning them.

Verse 19 – The Hebrew (shuv) means to turn, for us it means to repent, Elder Burton’s talk.

The reminder that Ezekiel is a watchman whose responsibility is to warn is repeated later in the book of Ezekiel (33:1-9) in greater detail.

 

Even if a prophet knows the people will not repent as a result of his preaching, he must still warn in order that his garments might be clean from the blood of that generation. (See Jacob 1:18-19.)The prophet Mormon cautions that even though the people reject the message of missionaries, prophets, or other representatives of God because of their own "hardness, let us labor diligently; for if we should be brought under condemnation; for we have a labor to perform whilst in this tabernacle of clay, that we may conquer the enemy of all righteousness, and rest our souls in the kingdom of God." (Moro. 9:6.)

 

In modern times, Spencer W. Kimball has taught the importance of this principle:

 

I am sure that Peter and James and Paul found it unpleasant business to constantly be calling people to repentance and warning them of dangers, but they continued unflinchingly. So we, your leaders, must be everlastingly at it; if young people do not understand them the fault may be partly ours. But, if we make the true way clear to you, then we are blameless. (BYUSY, Jan. 5, 1965, p. 6.)

 

 

(Daniel H. Ludlow, A Companion to Your Study of the Old Testament [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1981], 332 - 333.)

The Watchman (Ezek. 33)

 

Chapter 33 repeats themes that were first introduced in Ezekiel 3:17-21 and 18:20-32. Ezekiel was called to be a "watchman" for his people, a metaphor that is explained clearly in 33:2-9. A watchman's responsibility was to warn his people of the coming of invading armies. If he fulfilled his responsibility and warned them, he would be guiltless if they fell to the sword. But if he failed to warn them, God would require their blood "at the watchman's hand" (Ezek. 33:6). The Lord told Ezekiel that his prophetic call carried the same weight of responsibility. If he warned the people with God's message and they refused to listen, he would be innocent of the consequences that they would bear. If, however, he failed to warn them as commanded, God would require their blood at Ezekiel's hand (Ezek. 33:7-8). Because of this responsibility that comes to those who are called to serve, Lehi's sons Jacob and Joseph magnified their callings, lest they "would not be found spotless at the last day" (Jacob 1:18-19). fn

 

The Lord cares much less about whom he should blame for our wrongdoings than that we overcome them and be blessed. "I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked," he said, "but that the wicked turn from his way and live: turn ye, turn ye from your evil ways; for why will ye die, O house of Israel?" (Ezek. 33:11). Powerful lessons in repentance and enduring to the end follow. One who abandons a life of evil and turns to good will be rewarded in accordance with his repentance and his final disposition to do right: "None of his sins that he hath committed shall be mentioned unto him" (Ezek. 33:16; see also vv. 14-15, 19). On the other hand, one who forsakes a life of faithfulness and becomes unrighteous cannot count on prior good acts to save him when he dies in his sins: "All his righteousnesses shall not be remembered" (Ezek. 33:13; see also vv. 12, 18).

 

The last section of chapter 33 (vv. 21-33) begins with the announcement that Jerusalem had fallen, an event that was accompanied by a huge slaughter and the deportation of most of the city's remaining population. Yet these catastrophes would not be the end of Judah's sorrows, Ezekiel announced. Those who remained in the ruins would "fall by the sword," those who had escaped to the countryside would be devoured by animals, and those still hiding would die of plague (Ezek. 33:27). Like the other nations chastened by God's hand, Judah too would "know that I am the Lord" (Ezek. 33:29). fn

 

Had the people not been warned? Had Ezekiel and other prophets not been watchmen to let them know that these disasters would come? Indeed they had been warned, but their rejection of God's prophets was one of the causes of their sorrows. As the Lord told Ezekiel, "they hear thy words, but they will not do them" (Ezek. 33:31). Because the watchman had raised his voice and the people had not obeyed, they would carry the full burden of their sins. Ezekiel had foretold the consequences of their behavior, and when they would be forced to the realization that his prophecies had come true—as they surely would—then they would know "that a prophet hath been among them" (Ezek. 33:33).

 

 

(Kent P. Jackson, ed., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 4: 1 Kings to Malachi [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1993], 292.)

(Ezekiel 4:1-8.)

 

1 Thou also, son of man, take thee a tile, and lay it before thee, and pourtray upon it the city, even Jerusalem:

 

2 And lay siege against it, and build a fort against it, and cast a mount against it; set the camp also against it, and set battering rams against it round about.

 

3 Moreover take thou unto thee an iron pan, and set it for a wall of iron between thee and the city: and set thy face against it, and it shall be besieged, and thou shalt lay siege against it. This shall be a sign to the house of Israel.

 

4 Lie thou also upon thy left side, and lay the iniquity of the house of Israel upon it: according to the number of the days that thou shalt lie upon it thou shalt bear their iniquity.

 

5 For I have laid upon thee the years of their iniquity, according to the number of the days, three hundred and ninety days: so shalt thou bear the iniquity of the house of Israel.

 

6 And when thou hast accomplished them, lie again on thy right side, and thou shalt bear the iniquity of the house of Judah forty days: I have appointed thee each day for a year.

 

7 Therefore thou shalt set thy face toward the siege of Jerusalem, and thine arm shall be uncovered, and thou shalt prophesy against it.

 

8 And, behold, I will lay bands upon thee, and thou shalt not turn thee from one side to another, till thou hast ended the days of thy siege.

 

5 years before Babylon comes to destroy Judah once and for all.  These are strange object lessons.  He isn’t on his side the whole time!  Nature calls.

 

The people need to know he is the Lord’s mouthpiece.  They start to listen and follow him; of course the majority rejects his message.

 

Judah goes back to the land, but Israel hasn’t yet returned!

 

4:1-17 son of man, take thee a tile, and lay it before thee, and pourtray upon it the city, even Jerusalem

 

As a mode of communicating with his people, Ezekiel was to use symbolic objects, illustrations, and acts. Some of them are described in this and the next chapter. It was fitting that Ezekiel, who was called and instructed by spectacular visual revelations, was also to use visual aids to instruct the people Ezek. 4:1-8).

 

A portrayal on a clay tablet and a small model demonstration were used to show the Babylonian siege of Jerusalem, which was to occur nearly ten years after Ezekiel's call. How these drawings were shown to the people is not told.

 

Next, the prophet was shown symbolically that he had to counter the rebelliousness Israel had shown for three hundred ninety years (from the division of the kingdom under Jeroboam until the Babylonian captivity); he was also to combat the rebelliousness the Jews had shown for forty years. Just how the prophet could symbolically lie on his left side for three hundred ninety days and on his right side for forty days is not clear.

 

Ezekiel's third demonstration was to prepare and eat a small amount of mixed-grain bread (about one-half pound) and a small amount of water (about one quart) each day for a period of time to symbolize the defiled and limited food they would eat in captivity. The polluted fuel for baking the bread was so repulsive that he objected and was given a less objectionable option. The message was that lack of proper food and drink was part of the price the people paid for infidelity.

 

 

(Ellis T. Rasmussen, A Latter-day Saint Commentary on the Old Testament [Salt Lake City: Deseret, 1993], 586.)

 

 

The Lord is reasonable to Ezekiel’s complaint. He was a priest and wanted to obey the Law, the Lord was not harsh to him.

 

Ezekiel: Prophet of Judgment, Prophet of Promise

 

Gerald N. Lund

 

As I looked over the assignment to cover the entire book of Ezekiel in a fifty-minute lecture, it occurred to me that the job is somewhat analogous to trying to guide a tour of Disneyland in one hour. If I were a guide and had to do that for you, I'd really come down to one of two options. One way to do it would be to go inside the park and in that hour's time, running as fast as we could, try to see as many things as possible, by necessity choosing only the highlights—maybe Pirates of the Caribbean, or the Matterhorn, or the Haunted House. Then our time would be gone. We would just have to say, "When you come back be sure and see this or that." But there is another option for the guide who really desires to be helpful. At Disneyland there is a monorail which goes all the way around the outside of the park. A guide could spend the hour with you on the monorail, going around and orienting you to the design and layout of the park, pointing out what to look for and how to enjoy it when you get more time to go back.

 

The same problems are encountered in trying to cover Ezekiel in an hour's time. We can choose three or four special areas, focus on them in some detail, and tell you that the rest are also interesting. Or we can give an overview, orienting you to the layout of the book, so that when you return to it with more time you can find your own way about.

 

Obviously, if that is really what we are limited to, both options have their frustrations and their drawbacks. But I choose the second option. We are going to discuss the book of Ezekiel using the "monorail" approach. I accept the inherent frustrations in that approach with the hope that, when you come back to Ezekiel on your own, you will be better oriented, will know what to look for, and will therefore have a more meaningful experience.

 

As I look at the book of Ezekiel, I find four points of orientation that help us chart our course. They are all interdependent and interwoven, but still can be seen as four ways to view Ezekiel. They are: (1) Ezekiel the man, (2) Ezekiel the captive, (3) Ezekiel the answerer, and (4) Ezekiel the writer.

 

Ezekiel the man

 

Considering the length of his book, we know surprisingly little about Ezekiel the man. His name means "God strengthens," fn or, as one scholar translated it, "God will prevail" or "whom God has strengthened." fn This name is significant and appropriate.

 

We know from his own record that he was the son of Buzi (unfortunately we don't know who Buzi was), and that he was a priest (Ezekiel 1:3). Almost certainly he was carried away captive into Babylon in the second group of captives taken by Nebuchadnezzar (see 2 Kings 24:10-16). Some scholars have speculated that he may have served in the temple in Jerusalem before he was taken captive into Babylon, because in the later chapters it is obvious that he is intimately familiar with the temple rituals and other things that took place there. But he himself makes no mention of it, so that is merely speculation.

 

Josephus says that Ezekiel was carried away when he was young, implying that he may have been a young man or even a boy. fn That he was a boy doesn't seem likely, however, for several reasons. First, it was in the fifth year of his exile that he was called to be a prophet (Ezekiel 1:2). Second, in chapter 4, verse 14, Ezekiel spoke of his youth as though it was long past. Third, in the ninth year of his captivity, Ezekiel's wife died (Ezekiel 24:16-18), which again would seem to imply that he was a little older man. Finally, Ezekiel 1:1 contains an interesting phrase to consider: "Now it came to pass in the thirtieth year, in the fourth month, in the fifth day of the month" (emphasis added). Though Ezekiel doesn't say the thirtieth year of what, some scholars have assumed that maybe it was the thirtieth year of his own life. If that were the case, he would have been about twenty-five when he was taken into captivity. However, if it refers to the thirtieth year of his captivity, we cannot say for sure how old he was. (See similar dating references in Ezekiel 29:17; 31:1; etc.)

 

In two or three places in Ezekiel, we learn that while he was in exile the elders of the Jews came to his home to counsel with him (for example, see Ezekiel 8:1; 14:1; 20:1). Most often they rejected his counsel, but it is interesting that he functioned as a prophet in a very personal, face-to-face setting. It was for this reason that one scholar referred to him as a "pastor as well as prophet." fn

 

We know from Ezekiel's own record that he lived among the exiles in Tel Abib (Ezekiel 1:1, 3; 3:15), which seems to have been a colony of the Jewish exiles on the river Chebar, probably a small tributary of the Euphrates a little east of the city of Babylon itself. He spent his life among the captives, and the record indicates that he ministered for at least twenty-two years after his call as a prophet. Some questionable traditions indicate that he died a martyr at the hands of one of the Jewish leaders offended by his prophecies. fn Beyond that we know virtually nothing more about Ezekiel the man.

 

However, the Book of Mormon provides one additional interesting insight. In 1 Nephi 1:4, Nephi writes, "For it came to pass in the commencement of the first year of the reign of Zedekiah, king of Judah, (my father Lehi, having dwelt at Jerusalem in all his days); and in that same year there came many prophets, prophesying unto the people that they must repent, or the great city Jerusalem must be destroyed" (emphasis added). Ezekiel was contemporary with Lehi and could easily have been one of those prophets. We know the names of four of the prophets of that day—Lehi, Ezekiel, Jeremiah, and Daniel. Lehi's call was to lead a colony out of Jerusalem to a promised land. Jeremiah's call was to stay and bear witness of the destruction of Jerusalem. Daniel was called into exile, but he went into the royal courts and there was allowed to get a picture of the grand world view of history. Ezekiel was called to go among the captives and explain to them why this terrible tragedy had happened.

 

Ezekiel the Captive

 

When I talk about Ezekiel the captive, I refer to the historical setting in which he lived and wrote. And to do that I first need to talk about some historical and prophetic antecedents which are relevant to his time. Then we also need to explain the historical setting in which Ezekiel was found.

 

Probably the most important historical and prophetic antecedent dates back to Moses and his warnings to the people of Israel as they entered the promised land. Leviticus 26 and Deuteronomy 28 are whole chapters warning the people that once they entered the land of promise they would incur a solemn obligation. As long as they were faithful, righteous, and committed to the covenant, Moses promised them blessings. The land would be blessed, their enemies would be set aside, and so on (see Leviticus 26:1-13; Deuteronomy 28:1-14). But if they broke that covenant, then Moses began a series of grim warnings (see Leviticus 26:14-39; Deuteronomy 28:15-68). In both chapters Moses warned that the conditions would be such that cannibalism would result (see Leviticus 26:29; Deuteronomy 28:53, 57). That prophecy was fulfilled not once but several times (see 2 Kings 6:29; Lamentations 4:9-10). fn

 

The second historical precedent was the echoing of Moses' warning by virtually every prophet after Moses. Joshua, Elijah, Elisha, Isaiah, Amos, Hosea, Micah—everywhere we look, the prophets are found reminding Israel of the basic choice: either be faithful and reap blessings or be unfaithful and reap curses and punishments. The third historical prophetic antecedent occurred approximately one hundred years before Ezekiel's time when the Northern Kingdom was taken captive by Assyria. It was destroyed, annihilated—it ceased to exist. The people were taken north into Assyria, scattered and assimilated, and lost to history. At the time when the Northern Kingdom fell, the southern border of the kingdom of Assyria was five miles north of Jerusalem. Judah escaped the fate of the Northern Kingdom only by divine intervention because King Hezekiah heeded the counsel of the prophet Isaiah. (See 2 Kings 18-19; Isaiah 36-37.) Sennacherib laid siege to Jerusalem. Isaiah told Hezekiah not to worry, that not a single arrow would be fired against the city. And that night, in the quaint translation of the King James Version, 185,000 people woke up dead (see 2 Kings 19:35) and so Judah was delivered.

 

That event should have been such a graphic demonstration of the principle of spiritual survival—turn to God and live or face destruction—that Judah would have repented. But less than a century later, we find Judah back in the same state of wickedness facing a similar threat of destruction at the hands of Babylon. That is what we mean by the historical/prophetic antecedents of Ezekiel's time. He knew the warnings, he knew the doctrine, he knew the inevitable certainties if Judah did not repent.

 

Now let us look at the historical setting of Ezekiel's own day. In 612 B.C., Babylon began to seriously challenge the might of Assyria. Assyria was in a state of serious decay, so Babylonia moved north, and in 612 B.C. Nineveh fell. Basically that signaled the end of the Assyrian Empire. In 609 B.C. Egypt, preferring a weak Assyria to a strong Babylonia, made an alliance with Assyria. When the final battle between those two empires began, Egypt moved north to side with Assyria. It was at that time, though the scriptural record doesn't say why, that the righteous King Josiah of Judah tried to stop Pharaoh Necho at Megiddo. As nearly as we can tell it was like a fly trying to stop a bull. Necho swatted the fly and moved on, leaving Josiah dead and Judah mourning (see 2 Kings 23:29-30; 2 Chronicles 35:20-24). Though Assyria was destroyed, the battle between Egypt and Babylon ended more or less in a draw. Pharaoh Necho made Judah a vassal state, appointed King Jehoiakim as his puppet king, and made Judah pay tribute (see 2 Kings 23:31-35).

 

But Babylon was not through with Egypt. In 605 B.C., in what is called one of the significant battles of history, Egypt challenged Babylon in the battle of Carchemish. This time Babylon crushed Egypt and drove her all the way down into the plains of Philistia, which bordered Judah on the west. While he was there King Nebuchadnezzar, having decided that he would teach this state of Judah who their new master was, besieged Jerusalem. Jerusalem was no match for his power and therefore capitulated easily. Nebuchadnezzar withdrew, taking a small group of captives back with him to Babylon. This was the first of three times captives were taken. Daniel was almost certainly taken to Babylon in this first group.

 

Even though Jehoiakim was now a vassal king to Babylon, for some reason not fully explained in the scriptures he still gave his allegiance to Egypt. Both Jeremiah and Ezekiel warned that Egypt was weak and not to be trusted (see Jeremiah 44:29-30; 46:1-2; Ezekiel 17:15; 29:3, 19). Surprisingly, Egypt and Babylon clashed again in 601 B.C., but fought to a standstill this time. So Nebuchadnezzar withdrew back to Babylon. Ignoring the prophetic warnings, Jehoiakim decided that Babylon wasn't nearly as strong as Nebuchadnezzar had claimed, and he openly switched his allegiance to Egypt and stopped paying tribute to Babylon.

 

About 598 B.C. (traditional dating) Nebuchadnezzar decided to teach Judah a lesson. He laid siege to Jerusalem, killed King Jehoiakim, threw his body off the walls, fn and took three thousand captives. Jehoiachin was appointed as the successor king.

 

In 2 Kings 24 we read the final outcome of this event. The passage beginning in verse 14 is particularly noteworthy in our study of Ezekiel: "And he carried away all Jerusalem, and all the princes, and all the mighty men of valour, even ten thousand captives, and all the craftsmen and smiths: none remained, save the poorest sort of the people of the land.

 

"And he carried away Jehoiachin to Babylon, and the king's mother, and the king's wives, and his officers, and the mighty of the land, those carried he into captivity from Jerusalem to Babylon.

 

"And all the men of might, even seven thousand, and craftsmen and smiths a thousand," and so on, and so on.

 

So Nebuchadnezzar virtually took the entire upper and middle classes of Jerusalem captive. Ezekiel, being a priest, was certainly included. Even though Ezekiel was now in Babylon, the events in Jerusalem still affected him and his work and are therefore of interest to us.

 

During the next ten years, Zedekiah, who was appointed to replace Jehoiachin as the ruler in Jerusalem, did not learn a thing from the previous tragedy, nor did Judah. In Jerusalem, false prophets began to abound, predicting that Babylon would be overthrown and the captives returned. While both Jeremiah and Ezekiel strongly denounced these men (see Jeremiah 28, 29; Ezekiel 13), their presence added to the general confusion abounding in Jerusalem.

 

Then a second interesting event happened. Two prophets, Jeremiah and Ezekiel, reportedly uttered "contradictory" prophecies. Because these two prophecies seemed to directly contradict each other, Zedekiah rationalized that the two true prophets couldn't be trusted and went on listening to the false prophets. Let's examine the "contradictory" prophecies.

 

Jeremiah 34:2-3 says: "Thus saith the Lord, the God of Israel; Go and speak to Zedekiah king of Judah, and tell him, Thus saith the Lord; Behold, I will give this city into the hand of the king of Babylon, and he shall burn it with fire:

 

"And thou [Zedekiah] shalt not escape out of his hand, but shalt surely be taken, and delivered into his hand; [and then notice this phrase] and thine eyes shall behold the eyes of the king of Babylon, and he shall speak with thee mouth to mouth, and thou shalt go to Babylon" (emphasis added). That is Jeremiah's prophecy.

 

But in Ezekiel 12:13,Ezekiel said of Zedekiah, "My net also will I spread upon him, and he shall be taken in my snare: and I will bring him to Babylon to the land of the Chaldeans; yet shall he not see it, though he shall die there" (emphasis added).

 

It is obvious why the king thought the two prophets contradicted each other. Jeremiah said Zedekiah would look into the eyes of the king of Babylon, while Ezekiel said he would be taken into the land of the Chaldeans but would not see it, even though he would die there.

 

But of course they did not contradict each other. The fulfillment is an interesting one. When Nebuchadnezzar came a third time and conquered Jerusalem in 587 B.C., his generals captured all of the nobles, including Zedekiah and his sons (except Mulek, who escaped), and brought them north to the encampment of their king. Nebuchadnezzar came face to face with his prisoners (so they looked into his eyes) and killed the sons of Zedekiah as Zedekiah watched. Then he put out Zedekiah's eyes, blinding him, and carried him away captive into Babylon. Thus both predictions were fulfilled: Zedekiah looked into the eyes of the Babylonian king, yet he never saw the land of Babylon, where he was carried captive and later died.

 

But whatever the cause, Zedekiah and Judah did not repent. Again they revolted against Babylon, and so in 589 B.C. Nebuchadnezzar returned. This time he said, in effect, "We'll provide a lesson that everyone will listen to. Let us show the world what happens to those who rebel against Babylon." He left Jerusalem leveled and in ruins, and Judah was no more.

 

That is the historical setting in which Ezekiel lived and prophesied. Without an understanding of those circumstances, the meaning of Ezekiel's writings will largely remain obscure. fn

 

Ezekiel the Answerer

 

In the face of Nebuchadnezzar's successes in Palestine and the eventual fall of Judah, four important questions naturally arose in the minds of the people.

 

1. Is Jerusalem really going to be destroyed? In those last ten years of the reign of Zedekiah, that question was asked again and again. This was partly because the false prophets were confusing the people and partly because the Jews couldn't believe "God's people" would ever fall.

 

2. If God is really God, and we are really his chosen people, why is he allowing this to happen?

 

3. If we are being destroyed for being like the other nations (which Ezekiel and other prophets had said many times), then why aren't those nations destroyed?

 

4. What will this tragedy mean for the covenant? What will happen to all of the promises God has made about Israel's eventual triumph and salvation?

 

Now, those are some profound questions, and Ezekiel answered each one of them. And in fact, it is in understanding those questions and seeing how Ezekiel sought to answer them that we gain the greatest insights into his book. As much of his work is aimed at answering those questions, let's take them one at a time.

 

1. Is Jerusalem really going to be destroyed? Ezekiel gives an unqualified, resounding, thundering, yes! It is the major theme of chapters 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 15, 19, 21, 22, and 24. They all say Jerusalem has had it. That is a pretty hard answer to miss. Ezekiel himself went through several typological or symbolic actions to dramatize the coming disaster. For example, in chapter 4 he took a tile and drew a picture of Jerusalem on it. Then he put an iron pan against it. In that same chapter, by command of the Lord, he had to lie on his side for so many days, symbolizing the captivity, and then he was told to cook his bread with cow dung to symbolize that the people in Judah would eat defiled bread in coming times. In chapter 5 Ezekiel cut his hair and divided it into thirds, burning some and scattering some, again symbolizing what the people would suffer. In chapter 12 he moved his whole household, showing that the house of Judah was going to be moved out of their dwelling place in Jerusalem.

 

In chapter 24 we read that Ezekiel's wife died on the very day Nebuchadnezzar besieged Jerusalem (see vss. 1-2). Here was given the ultimate symbol or type of Jerusalem's coming destruction. Beginning in verse 15, note what the Lord told him: "Also the word of the Lord came unto me, saying,

 

"Son of man, behold, I take away from thee the desire of thine eyes [that is a hebrew euphemism for wife] with a stroke: yet neither shalt thou mourn nor weep, neither shall thy tears run down.

 

"Forbear to cry, make no mourning for the dead, bind the tire of thine head upon thee, and put on thy shoes upon thy feet, and cover not thy lips, and eat not the bread of men.

 

"So I spake unto the people in the morning: and at even my wife died; and I did in the morning [within twelve hours of his wife's death!] as I was commanded." (Emphasis added.)

 

Isn't that something? The Lord said in essence that the death of Ezekiel's wife would serve as a type and symbol of Jerusalem's destruction. When the people saw his wife die and saw that Ezekiel did not mourn, they asked why. In verse 22 the answer was given: "Ye shall do as I have done: ye shall not cover your lips, nor eat the bread of men." And then in verse 24 the Lord explained: "Thus Ezekiel is unto you a sign: according to all that he hath done shall ye do." Jerusalem was the bride of Jehovah, but there could be no mourning, for her tragedy was just and fully deserved.

 

So in answer to the people's first question, "Will Jerusalem really be destroyed?" Ezekiel gives a clear and unmistakable answer—yes.

 

2. If God is really God, and we are really his chosen people, why is he allowing this to happen? To this second question, once again Ezekiel answers that God is God and Israel is the covenant people. But they have rejected the covenant through wickedness; therefore, the Lord allows these things to happen. Note how clearly Ezekiel responds to this second question:

 

 Ezekiel 5:8: It is the Lord specifically who executes these judgments.

 

Ezekiel 7:4: The Lord not only refuses to have pity but specifically states, "I will recompense thy ways upon thee."

 

Ezekiel 7:19: Riches and wealth were "the stumblingblock of their iniquity."

 

Ezekiel 8: This entire chapter is devoted to a vision of the wickedness of Judah, including rampant idolatry which had even found its way into the temple (see esp. vss. 3-10). The Lord concludes by saying, "Therefore [because of this wickedness] will I also deal in fury" (vs. 18).

 

Ezekiel 16: This chapter contains a scathing denunciation of Israel. The chosen people are described as an illegitimate child; the Lord not only took her in (vss. 3-9) but adorned her like a bride (vss. 10-14) and married her himself. Instead of being faithful to her marriage to Jehovah, Israel played the part of the harlot (vs. 15), whoring after false gods. Indeed, the Lord said, she was worse than a harlot, for such a woman is unfaithful because her lovers give her money and gifts. In her spiritual adultery, Israel actually gave gifts to her lovers—the false gods (vss. 26-34). Then in that same chapter, in equally vivid imagery (see vss. 44-59), the Lord compared Judah to her spiritual sisters, Samaria (i.e., the northern kingdom of Israel, now lost and destroyed) and Sodom (the epitome of spiritual corruption).

And so Ezekiel's answer to the second question thunders out again and again. Judah and Jerusalem will reap the whirlwind they have sown in wickedness for generations. In chapter 33. Ezekiel gives one of the most profound and clear expositions of why judgments come upon a people. Clearly, Ezekiel explains, God takes no pleasure in sending these judgments, but the people leave him no choice. Note especially the language of verses 10-11

 

3. The third question raised by the tragedy of Judah has to do with the surrounding nations. The Lord often noted that the Jews were no different than their neighbors. Because they had committed whoredoms with Egypt, Assyria, and the Chaldeans, they were facing destruction. That is understandable, but the spinott question is, why doesn't God destroy the other nations too? Ezekiel answers this question in two ways. The first answer is based on the principle taught in Doctrine and Covenants 82:3, that "unto whom much is given much is required; and he who sins against the greater light receives the greater condemnation." Note how Ezekiel repeatedly reminded the people that they were the Lord's chosen, that they had the law and the covenant. They were not like the Gentiles in light and knowledge, but they had lowered themselves to maintain the same standards of behavior. (The following references are only a brief sampling of many where Ezekiel teaches this principle: Ezekiel 3:4-7; 5:5-7; 8:17-18; 9:9; 13:2-10; 16:6-9, 15; 20:5.) So his first answer to the third question is simply: You have greater light than they; therefore, more is required of you.

 

His second answer is also clear and simple: Whoever said that the other nations are exempt from the wrath of the Lord? Chapters 25 to 32 and chapter 35 describe the judgments that would come or had already come upon Ammon, Moab, Edom, Philistia, Tyre, Sidon, Egypt, Assyria, and Babylon. While these nations were sometimes used by the Lord as the rods for punishing Israel, Ezekiel's prophecies show that they were not exempt from his judgments either.

 

4. The fourth question which arises out of the tragedy of these times asks: If Jerusalem is destroyed, if the temple is lost, if we are scattered among the Gentiles, what does this mean for the covenant? Are we totally rejected by God? Are the promises and prophecies now set aside?

 

In his answer to the first three questions Ezekiel is a "prophet of judgment," but his answers to this final question make him a prophet of promise." A careful study of his writings shows that even the most harsh and caustic predictions and judgments were counterbalanced by an immediate addendum of hope. For example, after making dire and specific predictions of Jerusalem's destruction through famine, pestilence, war, and cannibalism (see Ezekiel 5:5-17), after predicting that Israel will be smitten with such devastation that the bones of the people will lie unburied at the altars of their false gods (see Ezekiel 6:4-5), the Lord tells Ezekiel: "Yet will I leave a remnant. ...And they that escape of you shall remember me among the nations. ...And they shall know that I am the Lord." (Ezekiel 6:8-10.)

 

Chapters 7 through 11 give an unremitting, uncompromising picture of Judah's wickedness and the consequent fury of the Lord —desolation, war, pestilence, destruction, widespread slaughter, and the carrying away of the survivors into captivity. But then again, once the Lord has poured out a picture of grim and stark despair he immediately, with two simple words, changes the tone. "Although I have cast them far off ... yet will I be to them as a ... sanctuary" (Ezekiel 11:16). Then follows a specific prophecy of Israel's restoration—a prophecy of great hope and tremendous promise:

 

Therefore say, Thus saith the Lord God; I will even gather you from the people, and assemble you out of the countries where ye have been scattered, and I will give you the land of Israel.

 

And they shall come thither, and they shall take away all the detestable things thereof and all the abominations thereof from thence.

 

And I will give them one heart, and I will put a new spirit within you; and I will take the stony heart out of their flesh, and will give them an heart of flesh:

 

That they may walk in my statutes, and keep mine ordinances, and do them: and they shall be my people, and I will be their God. (Ezekiel 11:17-20.)

 

This pattern of judgment and hope is repeated over and over. Earlier in this article, mention was made of the scathing denunciation of Judah in chapter 16, where the covenant people are compared to a harlot and to the cities of Sodom and Samaria. The words almost smoke even after twenty-six centuries. And yet when the denunciation was finished, there followed a promise of the restoration of the everlasting covenant, beginning with the hopeladen word "nevertheless" (Ezekiel 16:60-63).

 

Additionally, we find in Ezekiel's writings some of the grandest and most promising prophecies of Israel's future restoration and acceptance by the Lord:

 

1. Israel will return to the covenant and experience an eventual conversion to the gospel (Ezekiel 6:8-10; 11:17-20; 16:60-63; 17:22-24; 20:33-44; 33:11-16; 36:25-28; 37:1-14).

 

2. Israel will again have true prophets, loving pastors, and even the Messiah, the new David, to rule over them and teach them (Ezekiel 34:16-25; 37:24-28).

 

3. The land of Israel will be blessed and become fruitful, productive, and inhabited again (Ezekiel 33:26-28; 36:33-35; 47:1-11).

 

4. Latter-day scripture will be joined with the writings of Judah (Ezekiel 37:15-20).

 

5. Joseph and Judah will become one nation again, united under the gospel covenant (Ezekiel 37:21-25).

 

6. The temple will be rebuilt in jerusalem again (Ezekiel 37:26-28; chapters 40-47).

 

7. The nations of the world will gather against Israel, but will be defeated through the help of the Lord, bringing in an era of peace and triumph for them (Ezekiel 38-39).

 

8. Israel will receive the land of promise as their permanent inheritance (Ezekiel 47-48).

 

What a message of hope and inspiration, and note how directly each of those prophecies serves to answer these questions. Has the Lord forgotten Israel? Is the covenant no longer valid? Are the chosen people to be destroyed? Is the promised land lost forever? Thus we can truly call Ezekiel the prophet of judgment and promise.

 

Ezekiel the Writer

 

Our final area of examination is to look at the organization of Ezekiel's book. The text gives no clue to who collected and organized his writings into the book we now find in the Old Testament. It may have been Ezekiel himself, but whoever did it seems to have understood the four basic questions and Ezekiel's answers to them. Note the following structure:

 

Chapters 1-3 God is God, he is real and has all power. He

 

 has called me, Ezekiel, as his prophet.

 

Chapters 4-24 Because of idolatry, wickedness, and rejection

 

 of the covenant, Jerusalem is going to

 

 be destroyed and Israel scattered.

 

Chapters 25-32 The surrounding nations are likewise going

 

 to reap the judgments of God because of

 

 their wickedness.

 

Chapters 33-48 But God will still fulfill the covenants he

 

 made with the ancient patriarchs. Israel

 

 will not be totally destroyed. In the future

 

 they will be restored to their lands, converted

 

 to the true covenant, have righteous

 

 prophets, rebuild their temple, and accept

 

 the Messiah as their ruler.

 

Summary and Conclusion

 

There you have it—a quick "monorail ride" around Ezekiel. I admit that we have had to ignore much that is of great interest, much that is of great worth. And while this approach has been somewhat frustrating and incomplete, at least I hope you will return at your own leisure to read the book of Ezekiel and to study him in depth, using this introduction to help you find greater satisfaction and fruitfulness.

 

Notes

 

Footnotes

 

1. J.D. Douglas, ed., The New Bible Dictionary (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1962), p. 406.

 

2. Samuel Fallows, The Popular and Critical Bible Encyclopedia, 3 vols. (Chicago: Howard-Severance Co., 1911), 1:639.

 

3. Flavius Josephus, Josephus: Complete Works, trans. William Whiston (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Kregel Publications, 1960), Antiquities of the Jews 10.6.3.

 

4. James Hastings, ed., Dictionary of the Bible (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1909), p. 251.

 

5. Ibid.; Fallows, 1:639.

 

6. See also Josephus, Wars of the Jews, 6.4.4.

 

7. Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews, 10.6.3.

 

8. For excellent summaries of this period of history see Harry Thomas Frank, Discovering the Biblical World (New York: Harper and Row, 1975), pp. 124-30; Michael Avi-Yonah, ed., A History of the Holy Land (Jerusalem: Jerusalem Publishing House, 1969), pp. 90-97; Great People of the Bible and How They Lived (Pleasantville, N.Y.: Reader's Digest, 1974), pp. 230-45.

 

 

(Monte S. Nyman, ed., Isaiah and the Prophets: Inspired Voices from the Old Testament [Provo: BYU Religious Studies Center, 1984], 75.)

 

 

 

 

Ezekiel 6-10

 

November 16, 2006

 

 

 

Bruce gave a review of chapters 4 and 5, and the respective object lessons.

 

 

(Ezekiel 4:14-15.)

 

14 Then said I, Ah Lord GOD! behold, my soul hath not been polluted: for from my youth up even till now have I not eaten of that which dieth of itself, or is torn in pieces; neither came there abominable flesh into my mouth.

 

15 Then he said unto me, Lo, I have given thee cow's dung for man's dung, and thou shalt prepare thy bread therewith.

 

It is interesting how Ezekiel asked for clarification of the use of dung.  Use cow dung, you don’t need to use man’s dung.  Frankly during a siege how many cows would be alive?

 

Although Ezekiel was a prophet to the Israelitish exiles in Babylonia, he was permitted to see in vision what would happen to the Israelites who were still around Jerusalem: one-third would die by "pestilence, and with famine," one-third would "fall by the sword," and one-third would be scattered into different parts of the earth ("into all the winds"). This last statement would indicate that the scattering of the people of the kingdom of Judah during this period would not be limited to Babylonia.

 

The Book of Mormon indicates that some residents of Jerusalem during this period (Lehi, Ishmael, Mulek, and their families and groups) were led across the ocean to the continents now known as the Americas. (See 1 Ne. 2:1-5; 18:1-25; Hel. 6:10; 8:21.)

 

Similar prophecies concerning cannibalism among Israelites in Jerusalem at the time of the Babylonian siege were recorded in Deuteronomy (28:52-53) and by Jeremiah (19:9).

 

 

(Daniel H. Ludlow, A Companion to Your Study of the Old Testament [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1981], 334.)

 

 

(Ezekiel 5:2-4.)

 

 And thou, son of man, take thee a sharp knife, take thee a barber's razor, and cause it to pass upon thine head and upon thy beard: then take thee balances to weigh, and divide the hair.

 

2 Thou shalt burn with fire a third part in the midst of the city, when the days of the siege are fulfilled: and thou shalt take a third part, and smite about it with a knife: and a third part thou shalt scatter in the wind; and I will draw out a sword after them.

 

3 Thou shalt also take thereof a few in number, and bind them in thy skirts.

 

4 Then take of them again, and cast them into the midst of the fire, and burn them in the fire; for thereof shall a fire come forth into all the house of Israel.

1/3 – Burnt >>> 1/3 – Slain by sword >>> 1/3 – Scattered to the wind

 

Judgment upon the Mountains of Israel (Ezek. 6-7)

 

Whereas Ezekiel's words in chapters 4 and 5 were directed primarily to the community in exile in Babylon, now in chapters 6 and 7 Ezekiel's attention is focused on those who still remained in the land of Judah. Significantly, it is the mountains, hills, valleys, and stream beds that are addressed, the primary sites of the high places, incense altars, and idols of Canaanite worship to which errant Israelites were devoting themselves. In an act of divine poetic justice, God would slay before those very altars, high places, and idols the Israelites who had broken faith with him by worshiping there (cf. Deut. 29:16-28; 30:15-20). But though God promised death and destruction to the many, escape would be vouchsafed a few: "Yet will I leave a remnant, that ye may have some that shall escape the sword among the nations, when ye shall be scattered through the countries" (Ezek. 6:8).

 

In chapter 7, it is no longer the single community but the whole of the people who are addressed. "Over and over the prophet repeats his devastating message until his words pound the reader like a hammer. Disaster approaches. An end has come upon the land. Doom is near. God will not spare any of the people and will not pity them. The people are helpless against the approaching enemy. Prophets, priests, elders, and king are terrified and can do nothing. God will be known to Israel only in the irreversible judgment that will repay the people for their sins." fn This section is redolent of the terror of the "Day of the Lord" prophecies found in other prophets, perhaps most notably Amos (5:18-20; 8:1-14) and Isaiah (chap. 13), in which God would approach Israel, for good or ill, in judgment.

 

(Ezekiel 6:2-10., 13

 

 And the word of the LORD came unto me, saying,

 

2 Son of man, set thy face toward the mountains of Israel, and prophesy against them,

 

3 And say, Ye mountains of Israel, hear the word of the Lord GOD; Thus saith the Lord GOD to the mountains, and to the hills, to the rivers, and to the valleys; Behold, I, even I, will bring a sword upon you, and I will destroy your high places.

 

4 And your altars shall be desolate, and your images shall be broken: and I will cast down your slain men before your idols.

 

5 And I will lay the dead carcases of the children of Israel before their idols; and I will scatter your bones round about your altars.

 

6 In all your dwellingplaces the cities shall be laid waste, and the high places shall be desolate; that your altars may be laid waste and made desolate, and your idols may be broken and cease, and your images may be cut down, and your works may be abolished.

 

7 And the slain shall fall in the midst of you, and ye shall know that I am the LORD.

 

8 ¶ Yet will I leave a remnant, that ye may have some that shall escape the sword among the nations, when ye shall be scattered through the countries.

 

9 And they that escape of you shall remember me among the nations whither they shall be carried captives, because I am broken with their whorish heart, which hath departed from me, and with their eyes, which go a whoring after their idols: and they shall lothe themselves for the evils which they have committed in all their abominations.

 

10 And they shall know that I am the LORD, and that I have not said in vain that I would do this evil unto them.

 

13 Then shall ye know that I am the LORD, when their slain men shall be among their idols round about their altars, upon every high hill, in all the tops of the mountains, and under every green tree, and under every thick oak, the place where they did offer sweet savour to all their idols.

 

 

What are the high places?  1 Samuel 9: 9-22 & 1 Kings 3:1-5.  There were altars of sacrifice (animal) and altars of incense (prayer). Many people could be there they could spend several days there and they ate and slept there. They also worshipped various gods besides Jehovah.

 

They are not temples!  Yet a priesthood class ran them before there was a temple.  They were hard to destroy because of the people’s idolatry.

 

There was an importance emphasis on trees, Genesis 12:6-7, Joshua 24:23-26:

 

 

 

 

 

 

HIGH PLACE 

 

By : Emil G. Hirsch  

Etymology of "Bamah."
A raised space primitively on a natural, later also on an artificial, elevation devoted to and equipped for the sacrificial cult of a deity. The term occurs also in the Assyrian ("bamati"; see Friedrich Delitzsch, "Assyrisches Handwörterb." p. 177); and in the Mesha inscription it is found (line 3) as , which leaves the grammatical number doubtful. Etymologically the long ā () indicates derivation from a non-extant root, . The meaning is assured. The only point in doubt is whether the bamah originally received its name from the circumstance that it was located on a towering elevation or from the possible fact that, independently of its location, it was itself a raised construction. The latter view seems the more reasonable.The use in Assyrian of "bamati" in the sense of "mountains" or "hill country," as opposed to the plains, as well as similar implications in Hebrew (II Sam. i. 19, "high places" parallel to the "mountains" in II Sam. i. 21; comp. Micah iii. 12; Josh. xxvi. 18; Ezek. xxxvi. 2; Num. xxi. 28), is secondary. Because the bamah was often located on a hilltop; it gave its name to the mountain. The reverse is difficult to assume in view of the fact that the bamah is often differentiated from the supporting elevation (Ezek. vi. 3; I Kings xi. 7, xiv. 23), and that bamot were found in valleys (Jer. vii. 31, xix. 5, xxxii. 35; Ezek. l.c.) and in cities (I Kings xiii. 32; II Kings xvii. 9, xxiii. 5) at their gates (II Kings xxiii. 8).

Formation and Location.
Though in many passages the term may rightly be taken to connote any shrine or sanctuary without reference to elevation or particular construction (see Amos vii. 9, where "high places" = "sanctuaries"), yet there must have been peculiarities in the bamah not necessarily found in any ordinary shrine. At all events, altar and bamot are distinct in II Kings xxiii. 13; Isa. xxxvi. 7; II Chron. xiv. 3. The distinguishing characteristic of the bamah must have been that it was a raised platform, as verbs expressing ascent (I Kings ix. 3, 19; Isa. xv. 2) and descent (I Kings x. 5) are used in connection therewith. It was, perhaps, a series of ascending terraces like the Assyro-Babylonian "zigurat" (the "tower" of Babel; Jacob's "ladder"), and this feature was probably not absent even when the high place was situated on a mountain peak. The law concerning the building of the Altar (Ex. xx. 24) indicates that the base was of earth—a mound upon which the altar rested—primitively a huge rough, unhewn stone or dolmen, though Ewald's theory ("Gesch." iii. 390), that the understructure at times consisted of stones piled up so as to form a cone, is not without likelihood. These high places were generally near a city (comp. I Sam. ix. 25, x. 5). Near the bamah were often placed "ma
ẓẓebot" and the Asherah (see also Groves). The image of the god was to be seen at some of the high places (II Kings xvii. 29). Ephod and Teraphim were also among their appointments (Judges xvii. 5; I Sam. xxi. 9; comp. Hosea iii. 4). Buildings are mentioned, the so-called "houses of high places" (I Sam. ix. 22 et seq.; I Kings xii. 31, xiii. 32); and Ezek. xvi. 16 suggests the probability that temporary tents made of "garments" were to be found there.Further proof that the bamah was not the hill or mountain elevation, but a peculiar structure placed on the peak or erected elsewhere, is furnished by the verbs employed in connection with the destruction of the bamot: (Ezek. vi. 3; II Kings xxxi. 3), (Lev. xxvi. 30), (II Kings xxiii. 8, 15; II Chron. xxxi. 1), and (II Kings xxiii. 15). If "ramah" (Ezek. xvi. 24, 31) is an equivalent for "bamah," as it seems to be, the verbs denoting its erection ( and ) offer additional evidence. Moreover, the figurative value of the term in the idioms "tread upon high places" (e.g., in Deut. xxxiii. 29), "ride on high places" (e.g., Deut. xxxii. 13), where "fortress" is held to be its meaning, supports the foregoing view. The conquest of any city, the defeat of any tribe, included in ancient days the discomfiture of the deities, and hence the destruction or the disuse of their sanctuaries. Even in Ps. xviii. 34 (Hebr.) the word has this implication. "To place one on one's bamot" signifies to give one success (comp. Hab. iii. 19; Amos iv. 13; Micah i. 3; Job ix. 8; Isa. xiv. 14, lviii. 14), or to recognize orassert one's superiority. Attached to these high places were priests ("kohanim": I Kings xii. 32; xiii. 2, 23; II Kings xvii. 32, xxiii. 20; called also "kemarim"; II Kings xxiii. 5), as well as "edeshot" and "edeshim" = "diviners" (Hosea iv. 13, xi.) and "prophets" (I Sam. x. 5, 10; xi. 22). There is strong probability that the term "Levite" originally denoted a person "attached" in one capacity or another to these high places ( from in nif'al, "to join oneself to"). At these bamot joyous festivals were celebrated (Hosea ii. 13 [A. V. 15], 15[17]; ix. 4) with libations and sacrifices (ib. ii. 5 [7], iii. 1); tithes were brought to them (Gen. xxviii. 20-22; Amos iv. 4); and clan, family, or individual sacrifices were offered at them (I Sam. ix. 11; Deut. xii. 5-8, 11; the prohibition proving the prevalence of the practise). It was there that solemn covenants were ratified (Ex. xxi. 6, xxii. 8 [7]) and councils held (I Sam. xxii. 6, LXX.).

Origin of the Bamah.
That the high places were primitively sepulchral sanctuaries and thus connected with ancestral worship—this connection accounting for their peculiar form and their favorite location on mountains, where the dead were by preference put away (e.g., Aaron's grave on Hor, Num. xx. 20; Miriam's in Kadesh-barnea, Num. xx. 1; Joseph's in Shechem, Josh. xxiv. 32; Moses' on Nebo, Deut. xxxiv.)—has been advanced as one theory (see Nowack, "Hebräische Archäologie," ii. 14 et seq.; Benzinger, "Arch." Index, s.v. "Bamah"). In greater favor is another theory ascribing the origin of the bamot to the prevalent notion that the gods have their abodes "on the heights" (see Baudissin, "Studien zur Semitischen Religionsgesch." ii. 232 et seq.).

Home of the Gods.
The Old Testament documents abound in evidence that this notion was held by the Canaanites and was prevalent among the Hebrews (Deut. xii. 2; Num. xxxiii. 52). The Moabites worshiped Peor (Baal-peor) on the mountain of that name (Num. xxiii. 28; xxv. 3, 5, 18; xxxi. 16; Deut. iii. 29 ["Beth-peor"], iv. 3; Hosea ix. 10; Ps. cvi. 28), and had bamot (Isa. xv. 2, xvi. 12; Jer. xlviii. 35; comp. "Bamoth-baal," Josh. xiii. 17). "Baal-hermon" (I Chron. v. 23) points in the same direction. Carmel was certainly regarded as the dwelling-place of Baal (or Yhwh; I Kings xviii.). The Arameans are reported to have believed the God of Israel to be a mountain god (I Kings xx. 23, 28). The Assyrian deities held assemblies on the mountains of the north (Isa. xiv. 13). Non-Hebrew sources complete and confirm the Biblical data on this point (see Baudissin, l.c. p. 239). Patriarchal biography (the mention of Moriah in Gen. xxii. 2; of Gilead ["the mount"] in Gen. xxxi. 54 [comp. Judges xi. 29]; of Ramath-mizpeh in Josh. xiii. 26; of Ramath-gilead in I Kings iv. 13), the story of Moses (see Sinai, "the mount of God," in Ex. iii. 1. iv. 27, xxiv. 13; I Kings xix. 8; the hill in connection with the victory over Amalek in Ex. xvii. 9; Mount Hor in Num. xx. 25; Mount Ebal in Deut. xxvii.; Josh. viii. 30), and the accounts of the Earlier Prophets (see Carmel in I Kings xviii.; Micah vii. 14; Tabor in Judges iv. 6, xii. 14; Hosea v. 1; Mount Olive in II Sam. xv. 32; I Kings xi. 7) illustrate most amply the currency of the same conception among the Hebrews, who must have believed that mountain peaks were especially suitable places for sacrifices and ceremonies, or—what amounts to the same thing (Schwally, "Semitische Kriegsaltertümer," i., Leipsic, 1901)—for the gathering of the armed hosts. This conception, therefore, is at the bottom of both the plan of construction—in the shape of a sloping, terraced elevation—and the selection of natural heights for the locating of the bamot. W. R. Smith ("Rel. of Sem." Index), however, contends that the selection of a hill near the city was due to practical considerations, and came into vogue at the time when the burning of the sacrifice and the smoke had become the essential features of the cult. Even so, the fact that a hill above all other places was chosen points back to an anterior idea that elevations are nearer the seat of the deity.How far the connotation of "holiness" as "unapproachableness," "aloofness" influenced the plan and location of the bamah can not be determined, though the presumption is strong that this was the factor which determined the location of graves and sanctuaries on high peaks and the erection of shrines in imitation of such towering slopes.Of bamot the following are especially mentioned:The bamah of Gibeon (I Kings iii. 4; I Chron. xvi. 39, xxi. 29; II Chron. i. 3, 13); the bamah at Ramah, where Saul and Samuel met (I Sam. ix. 12, 13, 14, 19, 25); that at Gibeah, where Saul fell in with the howling dervishes or prophets (I Sam. x. 5, 13); that founded by Jeroboam at Beth-el (II Kings xxiii. 15); that built by Solomon in honor of Chemosh (I Kings xi. 7); one at a place not named (Ezek. xx. 29; comp. Jer. xlviii. 35; Isa. xvi. 12). The following places must have been bamot, though not always explicitly so denominated in the text: Bochim (Judges ii. 5); Ophrah (ib. vi. 24, viii. 27); Zorah (ib. xiii. 16-19); Shiloh (ib. xviii. 31); Dan (ib. xviii. 30); Beth-el (see above and Judges xx. 18 [R. V.], 23, 26 [R. V.], xxi. 2, 4); Mizpah (ib. xx. 1; I Sam. vii. 9); Ramah (see above and I Sam. vii. 17, ix. 12); Gibeah (see above and I Sam. xiv. 35); Gilgal (ib. x. 8, xi. 15, xiii. 9, xv. 21); Beth-lehem (ib. xvi. 2; xx. 6, 29); Nob (ib. xxi. 2); Hebron (II Sam. xv. 7); Giloh (ib. xv. 12); the thrashing-floor of Araunah (ib. xxiv. 25).

Originally Legitimate.
Some of these were of ancient origin, being associated with events in patriarchal days (e.g., Hebron [Shechem and Beer-sheba] and Beth-el, Gen. xii. 8, xiii. 4, xxviii. 22). This list, which might easily be enlarged, shows that the theory which regards the introduction of the high places as due to the pernicious example of the Canaanites and which would regard all bamot as originally illegitimate in the cult of Yhwh is inadmissible. Yhwh had His legitimate bamot as the "Chemosh" and "ba'alim" had theirs. Only in the latter days of the Judean kingdom, and then in consequence of the prophetic preachment, were the high places put under the ban. The redactor of the books of Kings even concedes the legitimacy of the high places before the building of the Solomonic Temple (I Kings iii. 2), and the books of Samuel make no effort to conceal the fact that Samuel offered sacrifices (I Sam. vii. 9) at places that the later Deuteronomic theory would not countenance. That the kings, both the good and the evil ones (Solomon, I Kings iii. 3, 4; Rehoboam, ib. xiv. 23; Jeroboam, ib. xii. 31, xiii.; Asa, ib. xv. 14; Jehoshaphat, ib. xxii. 43; Jehoash, II Kings xii. 3; Amaziah, ib. xiv. 4; Azariah, ib. xv. 4; Jotham, ib. xv. 25; Ahaz, ib. xvi. 4), tolerated andpatronized high places is admitted. Elijah is represented as bitterly deploring the destruction of these local shrines of Yhwh (I Kings xix. 10, 14), though Manasseh (II Kings xxi. 3) and even good kings are censured for having patronized them; and the catastrophe of the Northern Kingdom is attributed, in part at least, to the existence of these sanctuaries (ib.).The cause for this change of attitude toward the bamot, of which the Deuteronomic and Levitical law was, according to the critics, the result, not the reason, was the corruption that grew out of the coexistence of Canaanitish and of Yhwh's high places, the former contaminating the latter. The foreign wives of the kings certainly had a share in augmenting both the number and the priesthood of these shrines to non-Hebrew deities. The lascivious and immoral practises connected with the Phenician cults—the worship of the baalim and their consorts, of Molech, and of similar deities—must have reacted on the forms and atmosphere of the Yhwh high places. An idea of the horrors in vogue at these shrines may be formed from the denunciations of the Earlier Prophets (e.g., Amos and Hosea) as well as from Ezekiel (xvi. 24, xxv. 31). To destroy these plague-spots had thus become the ambition of the Prophets, not because the primitive worship of Yhwh had been hostile to local sanctuaries where Yhwh could be worshiped, but because while nominally devoted to Yhwh, these high places had introduced rites repugnant to the holiness of Israel's God. This may have been more especially the case in the Northern Kingdom, where there were bamot at Dan and Beth-el—with probably a bull or a phallic idol for Yhwh (I Kings xiv. 9; II Kings xvii. 16) and with bamot priests (I Kings xii. 32; xiii. 2, 33; Hosea x. 5; see also Amos iii. 14; Micah i. 5, 13)—and in all cities, hamlets, and even the least populous villages (II Kings xvii. 9 et seq.). Some of these bamot continued to exist after the destruction of Samaria (ib. xvii. 29).Josiah is credited with demolishing all the bamot-houses in Samaria (ib. xxiii. 19), killing the priests, and burning their bones on the altar (comp. ib. xxiii. 15), thus fulfilling the prediction put into the mouth of the Judean prophet under Jeroboam (I Kings xiii. 32) and of Amos (vii. 5).

Destruction of the High Places.
In Judea the high places flourished under Rehoboam (I Kings xiv. 23). His grandson Asa, though abolishing the foreign cults (ib. xv. 12; II Chron. xv. 8), did not totally exterminate the high places (I Kings xv. 14; II Chron. xv. 17); for his successor, Jehoshaphat, still found many of them (II Chron. xvii. 6; I Kings xxii. 47; see also I Kings xxii. 44; II Chron. xx. 33). Under Ahaz non-Hebrew bamot again increased (II Chron. xxviii. 24; comp. Tophet in Jer. vii. 31, xix. 5). Jerusalem especially abounded in them (Micah i. 5) Hezekiah is credited with having taken the first step toward remedying the evil (see Hezekiah, Critical View). Still under his successors, Manasseh and Amon, these high places were again in active operation. Josiah made an effort to put an end to the evil, but not with complete success (II Kings xxii. 3; II Chron. xxxiv. 3). There was opposition to his undertaking (see Jer. xi.), and after his death the Prophets had again to contend with the popularity of those old sanctuaries. Even after the Exile traces are found of a revival of their cult (Isa. lvii. 3, lxv. 1-7, lxvi. 17). After Josiah their priests, not all of whom were killed or transported to Jerusalem (II Kings xxiii. 5, 8), probably contrived to keep up these old local rites even at a late day, a supposition by no means irrational in view of the attachment manifested by Mohammedans to just such "ma
am" (= "meomot," Deut. xii. 2; Clermont-Ganneau, "The Survey of Western Palestine," p. 325, London, 1881; Conder, "Tent Work in Palestine," 1880, pp. 304-310).The critical analysis of the Law gives the same result as the foregoing historical survey. The Book of the Covenant (Ex. xx. 34) legitimates local altars: Deuteronomy (xii. 2, 3, 12; comp. xiv. 23-25; xv. 20; xvi. 2, 6, 15, 16; xvii. 8; xviii. 6) orders their destruction and the centralization of the cult at Jerusalem. In the Priestly Code (P) the centralization is tacitly assumed.

Rabbinic Attitude.
The later rabbis recognize the discrepancies between the Deuteronomic law and the actions reported of such saintly men as Samuel and Elijah, as well as of the Patriarchs. They solve the difficulties by assuming that up to the erection of the Tabernacle bamot were legitimate, and were forbidden only after its construction. But at Gilgal they were again permitted; at Shiloh, again prohibited. At Nob and Gibeon they were once more allowed; but after the opening of the Temple at Jerusalem they were forbidden forever (Zeb. xiv. 4 et seq.). The rabbinical explanations have been collected by Ugolino in his "Thesaurus" (x. 559 et seq.). A distinction is made between a great ("gedolah") bamah for public use and a small one for private sacrifices (Meg. i. 10; comp. Zeb. xiv. 6). The bamah was called "menu
ah" (= "temporary residence of the Shekinah"); the Temple at Jerusalem, "naalah" (= "permanent heritage") (Meg. 10a). A description of a small bamah is found in Tosef., Zeb., at end.E. G. H.



 

          

 

 

Copyright 2002 JewishEncyclopedia.com. All rights reserved. Privacy Terms of Use Contact

 

 

 

 

 

 

Again and again the Lord has warned the Church about following other voices, as, for example, at D&C 43:5: "This shall be a law unto you, that ye receive not the teachings of any that shall come before you as revelations or commandments; and this I give unto you that you may not be deceived, that you may know they are not of me" (emphasis added).

 

This verse of scripture deserves much more attention than it gets. This is a law, a commandment from God every bit as binding on the members as "Thou shalt not kill" and "Thou shalt not steal," maybe even more so since it was given specifically to the Church in these latter days. If we are to avoid deception, we are commanded by God not to listen to anyone who purports to reveal his doctrine or his will other than the properly called, sustained, and ordained priesthood leadership. Period. No ifs, ands, or buts—no exceptions. This includes religion teachers, fn authors, neighbors, rumors, newspapers, television, so-called "intellectuals," prevailing scientific opinion, returned missionaries, brothers-in-law, business partners, housewives, boyfriends, girlfriends, political candidates, a "friend of a friend," a "guy in my ward," mystics, gurus, and "real spiritual people." (Have I left anyone out?) Do we get the message here? Nobody talks for God but God and those properly called by God and properly sustained by the Church to represent him and conduct his business here on earth. I find the blind, ignorant compulsion of so many of the Saints to break this commandment and follow this guru or that self-appointed teacher as scandalous and inexplicable as the compulsion of ancient Israel to worship idols in the groves and high places of the Canaanites. Certainly the stupidity required and the results obtained are the same in both cases.

 

 

(Stephen E. Robinson, Following Christ: The Parable of the Divers and More Good News [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1995], 99 - 100.)

 

 

(Ezekiel 8:1-18.)

 

1 And it came to pass in the sixth year, in the sixth month, in the fifth day of the month, as I sat in mine house, and the elders of Judah sat before me, that the hand of the Lord GOD fell there upon me.

 

2 Then I beheld, and lo a likeness as the appearance of fire: from the appearance of his loins even downward, fire; and from his loins even upward, as the appearance of brightness, as the colour of amber.

3 And he put forth the form of an hand, and took me by a lock of mine head; and the spirit lifted me up between the earth and the heaven, and brought me in the visions of God to Jerusalem, to the door of the inner gate that looketh toward the north; where was the seat of the image of jealousy, which provoketh to jealousy.

 

4 And, behold, the glory of the God of Israel was there, according to the vision that I saw in the plain.

 

5 ¶ Then said he unto me, Son of man, lift up thine eyes now the way toward the north. So I lifted up mine eyes the way toward the north, and behold northward at the gate of the altar this image of jealousy in the entry.

 

6 He said furthermore unto me, Son of man, seest thou what they do? even the great abominations that the house of Israel committeth here, that I should go far off from my sanctuary? but turn thee yet again, and thou shalt see greater abominations.

 

7 ¶ And he brought me to the door of the court; and when I looked, behold a hole in the wall.

 

8 Then said he unto me, Son of man, dig now in the wall: and when I had digged in the wall, behold a door.

 

9 And he said unto me, Go in, and behold the wicked abominations that they do here.

 

10 So I went in and saw; and behold every form of creeping things, and abominable beasts, and all the idols of the house of Israel, pourtrayed upon the wall round about.

 

11 And there stood before them seventy men of the ancients of the house of Israel, and in the midst of them stood Jaazaniah the son of Shaphan, with every man his censer in his hand; and a thick cloud of incense went up.

 

12 Then said he unto me, Son of man, hast thou seen what the ancients of the house of Israel do in the dark, every man in the chambers of his imagery? for they say, The LORD seeth us not; the LORD hath forsaken the earth.

 

13 ¶ He said also unto me, Turn thee yet again, and thou shalt see greater abominations that they do.

 

14 Then he brought me to the door of the gate of the LORD's house which was toward the north; and, behold, there sat women weeping for Tammuz.

 

15 ¶ Then said he unto me, Hast thou seen this, O son of man? turn thee yet again, and thou shalt see greater abominations than these.

 

16 And he brought me into the inner court of the LORD's house, and, behold, at the door of the temple of the LORD, between the porch and the altar, were about five and twenty men, with their backs toward the temple of the LORD, and their faces toward the east; and they worshipped the sun toward the east.

 

17 ¶ Then he said unto me, Hast thou seen this, O son of man? Is it a light thing to the house of Judah that they commit the abominations which they commit here? for they have filled the land with violence, and have returned to provoke me to anger: and, lo, they put the branch to their nose.

 

18 Therefore will I also deal in fury: mine eye shall not spare, neither will I have pity: and though they cry in mine ears with a loud voice, yet will I not hear them.

 

Ezerkiel is now the 2nd witness to the wickedness of the people.

 

8:1-18 the spirit lifted me up between the earth and the heaven, and brought me in the visions of God to Jerusalem

 

This vision came a year and two months after Ezekiel's first vision and allowed him to perceive the flagrant idol worship right in the temple at Jerusalem. He saw again the Being he had seen in his first vision, felt again the divine hand, and beheld again the glory he had beheld during his call by being transported in the spirit to Jerusalem (Ezek. 8:1-4 and fn.).

 

He was shown idols and idolatrous worship at the north gate and in secret chambers (with elders participating); he saw also at the door of the north gate that women supplicated a nature god and eastward in front of the temple men worshipped the sun god while turning their backs on the temple. With a now unknown obscene gesture involving a branch and the nose, they spurned the Lord. It is evident that virtually everyone had turned to other gods for help, knowing that the living God was against them (Ezek. 8:5-18).

 

 

(Ellis T. Rasmussen, A Latter-day Saint Commentary on the Old Testament [Salt Lake City: Deseret, 1993], 589.)

 

The 4 Abominations

 

  1. Image of Jealousy – vs 3
  2. Praying to images on the wall – a secret men’s anmal cult worship, hidden from the outside world vs 7
  3. Women worship false gods Dumuzi and Inanna, the Babylonian gods of fertility this is a women’s cult Bruce wrote an article about them, it isn’t on the website, it’s an historical article not a religious one. vs 13-14
  4. A prayer ritual facing the sun (eastern direction) with their backs to the Lord’s temple, they prostrate themselves before the sun with their backsides facing the Lord’s house! vs 16-18 Yikes!

 

A final kind of idolatry, one that caused the Lord's presence to depart from his people as invading armies advanced on them (Ezekiel 8:6; 9:1-11), concerns the pollution of the temple by idols. Several kinds of idolatry polluted the house of God anciently, including the symbol of envy, fn a man-made idol situated at the inner entrance and exit (Ezekiel 8:3, 5). Men also viewed all manner of images portrayed against a wall (Ezekiel 8:10-12); elders of Israel made clouds of perfume or sweet odors (Ezekiel 8:11); fn women at the temple bewailed the death of a popular cult figure (Ezekiel 8:14); and men worshiped the great luminary in the temple's precincts (Ezekiel 8:16).

 

Because the Lord's people polluted the house of God by setting up their abominations in it (Jeremiah 7:30; 23:11), the temple proved no place of protection for them in the time of judgment (Jeremiah 7:4-10). When Israel's enemies entered the land, they went in and destroyed the temple (Jeremiah 52:13), or polluted it yet further by setting up their abominations in it (1 Maccabees 1:54). Beginning at the temple, they slew all except a certain few whom the Lord protected (Ezekiel 9:6-7). The latter sighed and cried continually because of the abominations in their midst (Ezekiel 9:4).

 

 

(John M. Lundquist and Stephen D. Ricks, eds., By Study and Also by Faith: Essays in Honor of Hugh W. Nibley on the Occasion of His Eightieth Birthday, 27 March 1990, 2 vols. [Salt Lake City and Provo: Deseret Book Co., Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies, 1990], 2: 398.)

 

 

(Ezekiel 9:2-11.)

 

He cried also in mine ears with a loud voice, saying, Cause them that have charge over the city to draw near, even every man with his destroying weapon in his hand.

 

2 And, behold, six men came from the way of the higher gate, which lieth toward the north, and every man a slaughter weapon in his hand; and one man among them was clothed with linen, with a writer's inkhorn by his side: and they went in, and stood beside the brasen altar.

 

3 And the glory of the God of Israel was gone up from the cherub, whereupon he was, to the threshold of the house. And he called to the man clothed with linen, which had the writer's inkhorn by his side;

 

4 And the LORD said unto him, Go through the midst of the city, through the midst of Jerusalem, and set a mark upon the foreheads of the men that sigh and that cry for all the abominations that be done in the midst thereof.

 

5 ¶ And to the others he said in mine hearing, Go ye after him through the city, and smite: let not your eye spare, neither have ye pity:

 

6 Slay utterly old and young, both maids, and little children, and women: but come not near any man upon whom is the mark; and begin at my sanctuary. Then they began at the ancient men which were before the house.

 

7 And he said unto them, Defile the house, and fill the courts with the slain: go ye forth. And they went forth, and slew in the city.

 

8 ¶ And it came to pass, while they were slaying them, and I was left, that I fell upon my face, and cried, and said, Ah Lord GOD! wilt thou destroy all the residue of Israel in thy pouring out of thy fury upon Jerusalem?

 

9 Then said he unto me, The iniquity of the house of Israel and Judah is exceeding great, and the land is full of blood, and the city full of perverseness: for they say, The LORD hath forsaken the earth, and the LORD seeth not.

 

10 And as for me also, mine eye shall not spare, neither will I have pity, but I will recompense their way upon their head.

 

11 And, behold, the man clothed with linen, which had the inkhorn by his side, reported the matter, saying, I have done as thou hast commanded me.

 

 

 

The Apostle John used portions of Ezekiel in his book of Revelation.  Remember the early saints had the Old Testament as their scriptures, they understood Ezekiel’s visions.   The destroying angels are described in chapter 9. 

 

Linen = white robes

 

The glory of God is leaving the temple and Ezekiel watches His glory leaving the temple and Jerusalem.  His glory = the Light of Christ.

 

Verse 4 – the mark is X, those who still have the Light of Christ and feel badly for what is happening receive the mark on their forehead.

 

D&C 1:8-10. The servants of the Lord have been given "power to seal." Ancient seals were used either to stamp the name of the owner, or some other mark of identification, on a document, or other object. Some seals were signet rings, worn on the hand; others were quite large affairs. In Ezek. 9:4-6, the man in linen garment was commanded to place a "mark"—the letter Tav, our T—on the foreheads of those who did not partake in the abominations practiced in Jerusalem. As Tav is the last letter in the Hebrew alphabet, it might properly be used as an abbreviation of the name of Him who is the First and the Last. In Rev. 7:4-8, an angel has the commission to seal the servants of God in their foreheads, and from Rev 14:1, it appears that the "mark" used at the time there referred to was the name of God, the Father of our Lord, in full. That sealing, or marking, was done, as the sprinkling of the blood upon the door-posts of the houses on the night of the exodus from Egypt, in order to save those who were so marked, from destruction. The power to seal conferred upon the servants of the Lord in this, the last dispensation, extends to the "unbelieving" and "rebellious." They have power to discern between truth and error, right and wrong, and to declare, authoritatively, that such and such doctrine is true, and the opposite false; that such and such conduct is in accordance with the mind and will of God, and that the contrary conduct is sinful. They have power to put the seal of disapprobation upon the children of men who persist in unbelief and rebellion, and those who are thus "sealed" and remain in that condition, will suffer the wrath of God. This sealing concerns the "unbelievers," those who refuse to accept the gospel message; and the "rebellious," i.e., those who turn against the servants of the Lord, especially those who do so after having enjoyed the privileges and blessings of membership in the Church.

(Hyrum M. Smith and Janne M. Sjodahl, Doctrine and Covenants Commentary [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1978], 6.)

 

 

 

A similar pattern is found in the book of Ezekiel. Ezekiel sees in vision six men come to Jerusalem. Five of them come with "a slaughter weapon in his hand; and one man among them [the sixth] was clothed with linen, with a writer's inkhorn by his side." The man clothed with linen is a priesthood bearer. In this story the priesthood places the mark, sign, or seal upon the foreheads of the righteous. The Lord calls to the "man clothed with linen, which had the writer's inkhorn by his side; and the Lord said unto him, Go through the midst of the city . . . and set a mark upon the foreheads of the men that sigh and that cry for all the abominations that be done in the midst thereof. And to the others he said in mine hearing, Go ye after him through the city, and smite . . . and begin at my sanctuary." (Ezekiel 9:2-6.) The city is then destroyed, all but those who have the mark upon their foreheads.

 

It is interesting that in the last days, the final cleansing of the earth also begins at the Lord's house: "Upon my house shall it begin, and from my house shall it go forth, saith the Lord; first among those among you, saith the Lord, who have professed to know my name and have not known me, and have blasphemed against me in the midst of my house, saith the Lord." (D&C 112:25-26.)

 

In all three examples, Revelation, Exodus, and Ezekiel, a mark or seal of some sort was placed upon those who were to be protected from the forces of destruction. We learn from the book of Revelation that in our day that mark or seal will be the "name of the Father." We learn from the dedicatory prayer of the Kirtland Temple that the name of the Father is placed upon those who "worship, and honorably hold a name and standing in" the Lord's house. In the dedicatory prayer Joseph Smith also prays that the Lord's "servants may go forth from this house armed with thy power, and that thy name may be upon them, and thy glory be round about them, and thine angels have charge over them." (D&C 109:22; emphasis added.) The threatened entry of the enemy will be opposed for those who have received the Father's name. "Unseen angels" will "have charge over them." Worshiping in the temple will be as important in our day as it was for the children of Israel to mark their doorways with lamb's blood when the destroying angel passed through Egypt.

 

I do not wish to suggest there is some mystical manner in which we receive the name of the Father in the temple. We must be wise as we interpret and apply symbolic language. The early Israelites were told by Moses to "bind" the commandment to "love the Lord thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy might . . . for a sign upon thine hand, and . . . as frontlets between thine eyes." (Deuteronomy 6:5-8.) In other words, the love and worship of God was to be constantly before their eyes, and their whole lives were to be guided by that love. They would have, in essence, an "eye single to the glory of God." (D&C 4:5.)

 

When we love and serve God with all our heart, soul, and might, we are truly his children. His name is upon us, just as the name of my own earthly father is upon me. We belong to his family and carry his name. Where, if not in the temple, do we as members of the Church promise that we will love and serve God with all our heart, soul, and might? Where are our eyes directed so completely to the glory of the Lord? When we make and strive to keep our covenants, his name is upon us. Then we need not fear the powers of the destroyer. The destroyer will pass us over. He cannot prevail, even though his forces are combined. His threatened entry into our homes and lives will be opposed.

 

In Revelation, John promised the Saints from Philadelphia that, if they overcame the temptations of their day, the Lord would make them "a pillar in the temple . . . [to] go no more out." Once they were in the temple, the Savior said, he would "write upon [them] the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, which is New Jerusalem . . . and I will write upon [them] my new name." (Revelation 3:12.) Here again we see the relationship of temple worship to the name of God. But in order to receive this great blessing, we must overcome temptation enough to enter the temple. Once worthy to enter, we seek to become a "pillar" in the Lord's house, someone he can place weight upon, someone who is steady, strong, and constant.

 

 

(S. Michael Wilcox, House of Glory: Finding Personal Meaning in the Temple [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1995], 52.)

 

This is symbolic, yet we know from the object lesson of chapter 5 what would really happen.  Little children died because their parents did not have the light of Christ, remember where little children go at death.  It is far better for them there then on earth in a wicked condition.  They had no chance in mortality.

 

Jerusalem is like Sodom, there is nothing redeemable left.  Did he find anyone to save?

 

Chapter 10 is like chapter 1.  The Lord is ready to leave; the fire is a symbol of cleansing.  This is a picture of His omnipresence, wings, faces, etc. . . .  Those who were destroyed are those who turned their back on His light and glory, they rejected Jehovah.  God’s Spirit will not always strive with man, He has been there to help, but they rejected Him.

 

Verse 19 – Cherubs face east, they are leaving in that direction. Why?

 

 

The Departure of the Lord's Glory from the Temple (Ezek. 8-11)

 

In Ezekiel 8 through 11, the picture of aberrant worship was reinforced when the prophet was shown an idol being worshiped in the temple, fn men praying toward the sun (forbidden in Deut. 4:19) with their backs to the temple (Ezek. 8:14-16), fn and women participating in mourning rites for Tammuz (Dumuzi), the ancient dying and rising fertility god of Mesopotamia, whose annual journey to the underworld was the occasion for wailing among his worshipers. When Tammuz died in the fourth month of the year (at the summer solstice), he descended into the netherworld, taking all his rain clouds with him. He needed to be resurrected in the autumn, in time for the beginning of the rainy season. Meanwhile, his consort descended after him to call him back from death. fn

 

The visionary judgment against the temple began when God called six armed executioners of the city, who approached the temple from the north, the traditional invasion route of enemy armies and the direction from which divine judgment was usually thought to come. They were accompanied by a scribe clothed in linen, the traditional garb of priests (Ex. 28:29-42) and angels (Dan. 10:5; 12:6). The Lord commanded the scribe to put a mark (the Hebrew letter taw, which originally had the appearance of our X) on all of the people in Jerusalem who mourned over the abominations being committed there. To the six executioners, the Lord gave the order to kill all of the men, women, and children in the city except those who had the mark on their forehead, beginning at the temple. Ezekiel, in distress at the carnage, asked the Lord if he would not relent. In reply, the Lord said that the sin of the people was very great, since they had said, "The Lord hath forsaken the earth, and the Lord seeth not" (Ezek. 9:9). Thereafter, Ezekiel had another vision of God in the temple at Jerusalem (chap. 10) that is reminiscent of the "throne-theophany" in chapter 1. Here, as the prophet looked on, the cherubim of the temple became the divine throne borne by the heavenly cherubim. As they departed from the temple, so also did the glory of the Lord (Ezek. 10:18-19; 11:22-23; cf. 43:1-5). God commanded the scribe to take coals from between the cherubim to spread over Jerusalem in order to destroy it. Before the scribe could do so, however, one of the cherubim handed the coals to him (Ezek. 10:6-8). The section ends with a series of prophecies of judgment and hope directed to Judah and Jerusalem (Ezek. 11:16-20).

 

The theological significance of this section is considerable. Many at Jerusalem at this time (some six years before its final destruction by Nebuchadnezzar) still believed that God would not allow the city and the temple to fall to any enemy. Ezekiel's message was unmistakable, however: God's presence had departed from Jerusalem, the temple was no longer inviolate, and the city itself was doomed because of the people's wickedness. Nevertheless God had not altogether forgotten his people: although he "cast them far off among the heathen," still the Lord would "be to them as a little sanctuary in the countries where they shall come" (Ezek. 11:16). Eventually, too, they would be gathered again in the land of Israel itself.

 

 

(Kent P. Jackson, ed., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 4: 1 Kings to Malachi [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1993], 274.)

 

 

This is a portion of a Meridian gospel doctrine lesson from Bruce.

 

The Early Oracles of Ezekiel

In 598-597 B.C. (600 B.C. Book of Mormon time), Jerusalem, which had been a vassal of Babylon, was besieged by the Babylonians.  They did this because Jehoiakim, son of Josiah, rebelled against Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon. During the siege, Jehoiakim died. His son, Jehoiachin reigned in his place. Three months later, the Babylonians conquered Jerusalem. Jehoiachin, along with many Jews, was exiled to Babylon. Zedekiah, son of Josiah and Jehoiachin’s uncle, was placed on the throne by Nebuchadnezzar.

Shortly after this, the prophet Jeremiah was shown a vision of two baskets of figs, one full of good figs and the other full of poor figs (Jer. 24). He was told that the basket of poor figs represented Zedekiah and all the Jews who remained in Jerusalem. Again, the Lord promised that because they continued in wickedness, “they [would] be consumed from off the land” (vs. 10).

On the other hand, the basket of good figs represented those who had been exiled to Babylon. It seems that the Lord allowed these Jews to be exiled to protect them from the further wickedness that would bring about Jerusalem’s destruction. This he did in order to prepare a people to return to Jerusalem. Therefore, the Lord promised that he would give the exiled Jews “an heart to know me, that I am the LORD: and they shall be my people, and I will be their God: for they shall return unto me with their whole heart” (vs. 7).

Ezekiel, a priest who had been among those exiled, was called of God to help the Jews undergo the change of heart that would prepare them for their eventual return. He was made “a watchman unto the house of Israel” to warn them of their wicked ways (Ezek. 3:17)[1]. A watchman was a guard or sentry who was to call out the safety of the city from the wall or gate (1 Sam. 14:16; 2 Sam. 18:24; 2 Kings 9:17; Jer. 51:12)[2]. It was hoped that if Ezekiel warned “the wicked” of the impending consequences of their wickedness, they would “turn from [their] sin, and do that which is lawful and right” (Ezek. 33:14).

Ezekiel began to receive revelations and visions mid-way between the 597 B. C. exile (see Ezek. 1:2) and the final siege and destruction of Jerusalem in 588-587 B.C. His first revelations warned of Jerusalem’s impending destruction. In 593 B.C., he dramatized the siege and destruction of Jerusalem through a series of symbolic acts (Ezek. 4-5).

Then he made clear that Jerusalem’s destruction was sure: “Thus saith the Lord GOD... Behold, I, even I, will bring a sword upon you, and I will destroy your high places. And your altars shall be desolate, and your images shall be broken: and I will cast down your slain men before your idols.” (Ezek. 6:3-4).

The hearts of the people of Jerusalem had turned from serving Jehovah to serving the images of the gods of the nations around them. Only through their destruction would they know that Jehovah was their God.

In language similar to that used of the people living in the days of Noah before the flood (see Gen. 6:13) the Lord said of Judah and Jerusalem: “the end is come upon the four corners of the land [of Judah]... for the land is full of bloody crimes, and the city [of Jerusalem] is full of violence” (Ezek. 7: 2, 23). The people of Jerusalem had become like the people in the days of Noah and would therefore experience a similar fate.

The Vision of the Corrupted Temple (Ezek. 8-11)

In 592 B.C., Ezekiel was taken in vision to Jerusalem where he witnessed the extent to which wickedness had consumed the hearts of the Jews. He also witnessed that their corruption caused the “glory of the Lord,” or the light of Christ, to withdraw from the city (Ezek. 8-11). The vision commenced with Ezekiel seeing through successive stages “increasingly greater acts of apostasy.” [3]

At first he was taken to a gate on the northern wall of the city[4] , where he saw an altar with “the image of jealousy”[5] (Ezek. 8:3,5) [6] . Just as the northern kingdom saw an increase in the number of altars throughout the land before its destruction (Hosea 8:11; 10:1), Ezekiel witnessed the same proliferation among the Jews in Jerusalem.[7]

Next, Ezekiel was shown a secret chamber in the wall near a gate leading into the inner court directly surrounding the temple.[8] Within the chamber he saw men practicing secret rites associated with images of “every form of creeping things, and abominable beasts, and all the idols of the house of Israel, portrayed upon the wall round about.”

In an attempt to justify their actions, the men said, “The LORD seeth us not; the LORD hath forsaken the earth” (Ezek. 8:7-12). Instead of repenting of their actions and pleading that the Lord would return, Jehovah’s absence was used as a justification for their worship of pagan deities.

Ezekiel was brought within the northern gate of the inner court immediately surrounding the temple. The inner court and the temple were designed to be the central place of Jehovah worship. But Ezekiel witnessed that Jehovah was no longer honored nor worshiped. Immediately upon his entrance into the inner court, his attention was drawn to the sound of several women sitting near where he stood, who were “weeping for Tammuz” (Ezek. 8:13-14), a Mesopotamian fertility deity, whose annual death and resurrection rites were accompanied by mourners weeping upon his death [9].

After gazing upon this scene, the Lord told Ezekiel to focus his attention on the area between the altar and the porch of the temple, an area of great sanctity. Only the temple itself was more sacred. [10] In this place of holiness, Ezekiel saw twenty-five men “with their backs toward the temple of the LORD, and their faces toward the east; and they worshiped [Heb. shachah, to bow down][11] the sun toward the east” (Ezek. 8:16).

Whether these men were involved in pagan solar worship, such as was found in Egypt or Mesopotamia, or a form a solarized Jehovah worship as some have suggested [12], what it is clear is that their actions were seen by the Lord as abominable (Ezek. 8:17). It was a deliberate affront to true Jehovah worship. In the area where priests would pray to Jehovah in behalf of Israel (see Joel 2:17), these men were bowing to the sun rising in the east with their backsides directed towards the temple of Jehovah.

Ezekiel was told that these contemptible cultic actions were superseded only by the general social corruption of the people. The Lord said: “Is it a light thing to the house of Judah that they commit the abominations which they commit here [in the temple]? for they have filled the land with violence [Heb. chamas, violence, wrong, injustice] [13] , and have returned to provoke me to anger” (Ezek. 8:17).

As in Ezekiel 7:23, the language of their social corruptions is reminiscent of the people in the days of Noah. Having literally turned their backs upon the light of Christ, the people had given themselves over to the “will of the flesh and the evil which is therein” (2 Nephi 2:29).

Following the desires of the natural man, like those in the days of Noah, “every imagination of the thoughts of [their] heart[s] was only evil continually” (Gen. 6:5; cf. Moses 8:22). Ignoring the light of Christ, the Jews lost their agency. The Lord was forced to destroy them for their own good and the good of their children. “Therefore,” the Lord told Ezekiel, “will I also deal in fury: mine eye shall not spare, neither will I have pity: and though they cry in mine ears with a loud voice, yet will I not hear them” (Ezek. 8:18).

The Withdrawal of the Glory of the Lord

As he had seen the wickedness of the Jews in successive degrees, Ezekiel witnessed the withdrawal of the light of Christ in successive stages. While in the inner court, Ezekiel heard the Lord call for the servants whose assignment was to destroy Jerusalem. Six men came from the north (the direction the Babylonian army would come) and stood by the altar, each one holding “a slaughter weapon in his hand” (Ezek. 9:2-3). Added to them was a seventh man “clothed with linen, with a writer’s inkhorn by his side” (Ezek. 9:3).

Then “the glory of the God of Israel,” which had filled the house of the Lord at the time of Solomon’s dedication of the temple (1 Kings 8:10-11), and presumably had remained there, moved from the holy of holies to the threshold of the temple. Remember that those who were worshiping in the hidden chamber justified their actions claiming that the Lord had abandoned them (see Ezek. 8:12). But the truth was, the Lord had not abandoned them. His glory or light was still there.

The moving of the glory of the Lord to the threshold of the temple was the first stage of the Lord’s abandonment of his people. But he would not abandon them to their destruction until all the righteous had been removed. He commanded the man with the writer’s inkwell attached to his side to go throughout Jerusalem and place a mark (Heb., I, the last letter of the Hebrew alphabet written in the old Hebrew script as an X) on the foreheads of everyone who found the abominations of the people shameful (Ezek. 9:4). We are not told whether he found any or not.

The other six men were told to follow him and destroy all whom had no mark. When the man with the inkhorn returned from his assignment, he was told to get coals from between the cherubim, which acted as the throne where the glory of the Lord rested, and “scatter them over the city” (Ezek. 10:2). This signified that Jerusalem was now ready for destruction.

As the man did so, the glory of the Lord moved from the threshold to the east gate of the temple (Ezek. 10:18-19). Ezekiel was taken by the Spirit to the same place (Ezek. 11:1) where he witnessed further apostasy of the people of Jerusalem and thus further justifying the Lord’s destruction of the city. They had come to believe that because they had not been exiled with those who were taken to Babylon in 597 B.C., no further calamities would come upon them (Ezek. 11:2-3).

Their being left behind, however, was not intended to justify their wicked actions. Rather their wickedness would justify their destruction. Ezekiel was commanded to prophesy against them, saying, “And I will bring you out of the midst thereof, and deliver you into the hands of strangers, and will execute judgments among you. Ye shall fall by the sword... And ye shall know that I am the LORD: for ye have not walked in my statutes, neither executed my judgments, but have done after the manners of the heathen that are round about you” (Ezek. 11:9-10, 12).

Ezekiel asked the Lord, “wilt thou make a full end of the remnant of Israel?” (Ezek. 11:13). The answer of the Lord was, No! “Although I have cast them far off among the heathen, and although I have scattered them among the countries, yet will I be to them as a little sanctuary in the countries where they shall come” (Ezek. 8:16).

This is a key verse. Though Jerusalem and the temple would be destroyed, the Lord would still be a little sanctuary or temple to Israel. The temple was a symbol of the fulness of the divine presence of God [14]. But though the fulness of God’s presence would be lost for a time, the Lord would still be a small sanctuary to Israel in their scattered condition through the ever present light of Christ that fills “the immensity of space — the light which is in all things, which giveth life to all things, which is the law by which all things are governed, even the power of God who sitteth upon his throne” (D&C 88:12-13).

If Israel would respond to the light of Christ and come unto the Lord, the Lord would “give them one heart, and I will put a new spirit within you; and I will take the stony heart out of their flesh, and will give them an heart of flesh: That they may walk in my statutes, and keep mine ordinances, and do them: and they shall be my people, and I will be their God” (Ezek. 11:19-20).

Ezekiel was later shown that the remnant of Israel who hearken to the light of Christ would eventually be able to return to Jerusalem with a holy temple wherein the fulness of the glory of the Lord would be found (Ezek. 40-48). Perhaps to symbolize this, the vision ended with the glory of the Lord, making a third movement eastward, to the Mt. of Olives (Ezek. 11:22-23). The Mt. of Olives formed Jerusalem’s eastern horizon. Babylon, where the exiled Jews were taken, lay to the east of Jerusalem. It may be that the Mt. of Olives represented the location of the exiled Jews. There the Lord rested until the return of Israel.

References:

1.        See Gospel Doctrine Lesson 43 in Meridian Magazine.

2.        C.U. Wolf, “Watchman,” in The Interpreter’s Dictionary of the Bible, 4 Vols. (Nashville, Tenn.: Abingdon, 1962), 4:806.

3.        Carely, The Book of the Prophet Ezekiel, p. 51.

4.        The Hebrew text of Ezekiel 8:3, 5 is difficult lending itself to various possible translations. The text however seems to suggest that the altar and image of jealousy were located next to the northern city gate which would have been north of the northern gate of the inner court where Ezekiel was first set down. Among those who hold this view, see: S. Fish, Ezekiel (London: Soncino, 1985), p. 42; Carley, The Book of the Prophet Ezekiel, p. 52; Walther Zimmerli, Ezekiel 1 (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1979), p. 238. But others (such as Daniel I. Block, The Book of Ezekiel Chapters 1-24 [Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 1997], p. 280) see this gate as the northern gate of the inner court.

5.        Many have suggested that the image was the Canaanite fertility goddess, Asherah [see Carley, The Book of the Prophet Ezekiel, p. 53; Moshe Greenberg, Ezekiel 1-20 (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1983), p. 168; Fisch, Ezekiel, p. 42]. But Zimmerli does not think so (Ezekiel 1, pp. 238-239).

6.        High places with the images of pagan deities were often placed near the gates of cities (see 2 Kings 23:8) as can be seen, for example, at the Iron Age gates of Tel Dan [see Avraham Biran, “Dan,” in The New Encyclopedia of Archaeological Excavations in the Holy Land, 4 Vols. Ephraim Stern, ed. (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1993),1:323-332; also Avraham Biran, “Sacred Spaces of Standing Stones, High Places and Cult Objects at Tel Dan,” Biblical Archaeology Review, Sep/Oct 1998 (Vol. 24 No. 5), pp. 38-45, 70] and Bethsaida (et-Tel) [see Rami Arav, et al., “Bethsaida Rediscovered,” Biblical Archaeology Review, Jan/Feb 2000 (Vol. 26 No.1), pp. 45-56].

7.        This corroborates Jeremiah’s testimony wherein he said, “according to the number of the streets of Jerusalem have ye set up altars to that shameful thing” (Jer. 11:13).

8.        For an excellent discussion of the layout of Solomon’s temple including surrounding courts, see Victor V. Hurowitz, “Inside Solomon’s Temple,” Bible Review (April 1994), pp. 24-37, 50. For other discussions, see Roland de Vaux, Ancient Israel: Vol. 2 Religious Institutions (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1961), pp. 312-322; Menahem Haran, Temples and Temple Service in Ancient Israel (Winona Lake, Indiana: Eisenbrauns, 1985) pp. 189-194. Also helpful is Leslie C. Allen’s discussion of Ezekiel’s movements within the temple complex, including diagram, in Word Biblical Commentary: Ezekiel 1-19 (Dallas, TX: Word Books, 1994), pp. 139-141.

9.        There is scholarly debate the as to the exact nature of Tammuz (Dumuzi) worship. See, O.R. Gurney, “Tammuz Reconsidered: Some Recent Developments,” Journal of Semitic Studies 7 (1962), pp. 142-160; Thorkild Jacbosen, “Toward the Image of Tammuz,” in Toward the Image of Tammuz and Other Essays on Mesopotamian History and Culture, ed. W. L. Moran (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard, 1970), pp. 73-103); Samuel Noah Kramer, The Sacred Marriage Rite (Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press, 1969), pp. 107-133; Edwin M. Yamauchi, “Tammuz and the Bible,” Journal of Biblical Literature 84 (1965), pp. 283-290.

10.     Later rabbis considered the area between the altar and the porch of the temple one of the most sacred areas in the land. The Mishnah describes “ten degrees of holiness” beginning with the land of Israel and ending with the Holy of Holies, with each degree more holy than the next (see Kelim 1:6-9). In this list, only the holy place and the holy of holies within the temple itself were more holy than the space between the altar and the temple. According to the Mishnah, it was in this area that the priests blessed the people after performing the daily offering (see Tamid 7:2). This also was the place where the priests in the days of the Maccabees petitioned the Lord (1 Maccabees 7:36-38).

11.     The form shachah is found this verse is mishtachawithem, which is unusual. It appears to be a participle with a second masculine singlular perfect sufformative. Some scholars (such as Zimmerli, Ezekiel 1, pp. 221 and Block, The Book of Ezekiel: Chapters 1-24, p. 296, n. 70) assign this to scribal error feeling the word should be written mishtachawim, the normal rendering of worship. However, the Rabbis traditionally explained this unusual form as a compound of mashchithim (they destroy) and mishtachawim (they worship). They see in the word as it is presently rendered the dual nature of the abomination being acted out before the Lord: the worship of the sun god would bring about the destruction of the temple (see Fisch, Ezekiel, p. 45).

12.     Zimmerli, Ezekiel 1, pp. 243-244.

13.     The primary use of chamas in the Old Testament is in societal contexts: oppression, injustice, and false accusation based upon greed. But chamas can be taken to the point of physical violence and destruction. For a greater understanding of this word, see H. Haag, “Chamas,” in Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament. Presently 10 vols. Edited By G. Johannes Botterweck and Helmer Ringgren (Grand Rapids, Mich: Eerdmans, 1980), 4: 478-487.

14.     President Marion G. Romney taught that the light of Christ may be experienced in three phases: first, the light which enlighteneth every man that cometh into the world; second, the gift of the Holy Ghost; and third, is the second comforter obtained through the more sure word of prophecy when one’s calling and election is made sure (see “The Light of Christ,” Ensign [May 1977], pp. 43-45). In order to obtain the fulness of the light of Christ one must experience all three phases. These three phases are central to temple worship and are represented in modern temples through various stages of the endowment. These three phases can also be seen in the layout of Solomon’s temple. The first phase may be represented by the area outside of the temple including both outer and inner courts. The second phase may be represented by the holy place that housed, among other things, the seven branched candelabra. The third phase may be represented by the holy of holies with its ark of the covenant.

 

 

 

 

Ezekiel 11-20

 

November 30, 2006

 

 

 

Bruce had a lot of ground to cover so he hit and missed a few chapters tonight.

 

The loss of light in Jerusalem by stages, a gradual event.

 

(Ezekiel 11:1-15.)

 

1 Moreover the spirit lifted me up, and brought me unto the east gate of the LORD's house, which looketh eastward: and behold at the door of the gate five and twenty men; among whom I saw Jaazaniah the son of Azur, and Pelatiah the son of Benaiah, princes of the people.

 

2 Then said he unto me, Son of man, these are the men that devise mischief, and give wicked counsel in this city:

 

3 Which say, It is not near; let us build houses: this city is the caldron, and we be the flesh.

 

4 ¶ Therefore prophesy against them, prophesy, O son of man.

 

5 And the Spirit of the LORD fell upon me, and said unto me, Speak; Thus saith the LORD; Thus have ye said, O house of Israel: for I know the things that come into your mind, every one of them.

 

6 Ye have multiplied your slain in this city, and ye have filled the streets thereof with the slain.

 

7 Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD; Your slain whom ye have laid in the midst of it, they are the flesh, and this city is the caldron: but I will bring you forth out of the midst of it.

 

8 Ye have feared the sword; and I will bring a sword upon you, saith the Lord GOD.

 

9 And I will bring you out of the midst thereof, and deliver you into the hands of strangers, and will execute judgments among you.

 

10 Ye shall fall by the sword; I will judge you in the border of Israel; and ye shall know that I am the LORD.

 

11 This city shall not be your caldron, neither shall ye be the flesh in the midst thereof; but I will judge you in the border of Israel:

 

12 And ye shall know that I am the LORD: for ye have not walked in my statutes, neither executed my judgments, but have done after the manners of the heathen that are round about you.

 

13 ¶ And it came to pass, when I prophesied, that Pelatiah the son of Benaiah died. Then fell I down upon my face, and cried with a loud voice, and said, Ah Lord GOD! wilt thou make a full end of the remnant of Israel?

 

14 Again the word of the LORD came unto me, saying,

 

15 Son of man, thy brethren, even thy brethren, the men of thy kindred, and all the house of Israel wholly, are they unto whom the inhabitants of Jerusalem have said, Get you far from the LORD: unto us is this land given in possession.

 

 

 

11:1-16 Son of man, these are the men that devise mischief, and give wicked counsel in this city

 

Yet, before his vision of Jerusalem closed, the prophet was shown twenty-five of the chief leaders responsible for the rebellious attitude in that city; they were denying that any crisis was near and advising business as usual. The Lord's message about them was that their counsel would increase the number who would fall in the siege. Instead of the leaders being as the sacred flesh protected in a caldron, they would be taken out and subjected to just punishment (Ezek. 11:3, Ezek. 11:9-11).

 

Even as Ezekiel had prophesied, one of the leaders, Pelatiah, died. The prophet wondered whether that instant punishment signaled the beginning of the end of the "remnant of Israel." The Lord replied that though they were cast off among the heathen and scattered "among the countries," yet he would remain "to them as a little sanctuary in the countries where they shall come" (Ezek. 11:13-16). That promise that some people would have a little sanctuary of faith in God in all lands was an important statement of an aspect of the mission of Abraham through the scattering of Israel.

 

 

(Ellis T. Rasmussen, A Latter-day Saint Commentary on the Old Testament [Salt Lake City: Deseret, 1993], 590.)

 

 

(Ezekiel 11:16-25.) – Sanctuary = Temples around the world, the Latter Day restoration.

 

16 Therefore say, Thus saith the Lord GOD: Although I have cast them far off among the heathen, and although I have scattered them among the countries, yet will I be to them as a little sanctuary in the countries where they shall come.

 

17 Therefore say, Thus saith the Lord GOD; I will even gather you from the people, and assemble you out of the countries where ye have been scattered, and I will give you the land of Israel.

 

18 And they shall come thither, and they shall take away all the detestable things thereof and all the abominations thereof from thence.

 

19 And I will give them one heart, and I will put a new spirit within you; and I will take the stony heart out of their flesh, and will give them an heart of flesh:

 

20 That they may walk in my statutes, and keep mine ordinances, and do them: and they shall be my people, and I will be their God.

 

21 But as for them whose heart walketh after the heart of their detestable things and their abominations, I will recompense their way upon their own heads, saith the Lord GOD.

 

22 ¶ Then did the cherubims lift up their wings, and the wheels beside them; and the glory of the God of Israel was over them above.

 

23 And the glory of the LORD went up from the midst of the city, and stood upon the mountain which is on the east side of the city.

 

24 ¶ Afterwards the spirit took me up, and brought me in a vision by the Spirit of God into Chaldea, to them of the captivity. So the vision that I had seen went up from me.

 

25 Then I spake unto them of the captivity all the things that the LORD had shewed me.

 

Northern kingdom is being gathered in the Sanctuaries of the Lord while the Southern kingdom has yet to be spiritually gathered.

 

Vs 19 = Jeremiah 34:31-34

 

The light of Christ is now removed from the city; it isn’t too far away on the Mt. of Olives.  Yet Jerusalem is ripe for destruction because of their wickedness. 

 

11:17-25 Thus saith the Lord God; I will even gather you from the people, and assemble you out of the countries where ye have been scattered, and I will give you the land of Israel

 

As is usual in connection with prophecies of the scattering and exile of Israel, the Lord renewed his promise of the latter-day gathering. It must have given some comfort to the faithful to know that the plans of the Lord would not be thwarted and in time would be fulfilled. For faithful people who know the prophecies in the last days, it is reassuring still.

 

Some important corollary promises were added: the former abominations in idolatrous worship will exist no more, for the people will be of "one heart"; a "new spirit within" will be given. The unreceptive attitude called "the stony heart" will be replaced by a receptive and sensitive "heart of flesh." True worship of the true God will then resume.

 

This marvelous vision of Ezekiel concluded when the cherubim and the wheeled throne-chariot bearing the Glory of the Lord moved up and away from the midst of the city, to hover for a time over the mount (of Olives) east of the city and then depart. Then the Spirit returned the prophet to Chaldea to those in captivity, and he related to them the marvelous vision.

 

 

(Ellis T. Rasmussen, A Latter-day Saint Commentary on the Old Testament [Salt Lake City: Deseret, 1993], 590.)

 

Symbols and Prophecies of Exile (Ezek. 12-14)

 

In sight of the exiles in Babylon, Ezekiel was commanded to pack up his knapsack by day and to depart by evening while they still watched. This pantomime was to symbolize the fate of those who were yet in Jerusalem and other parts of the land, who would be taken captive and forced to become vagabonds in order to sustain themselves (Ezek. 12:1-10). This pantomime reflects, in fact, what happened to some of those at the time of the destruction of Jerusalem by the Babylonians. Even King Zedekiah attempted to escape from Jerusalem by night but was captured by the Babylonians and blinded (2 Kgs. 25:3-7; Jer. 39:4-7; 52:6-11).

 

Then the interpretation of the pantomime is given, and the entire act is interpreted as a type of what would happen to the people: "Like as I have done, so shall it be done unto them: they shall remove and go into captivity" (Ezek. 12:11). The symbolic acts of the prophets are similar to the simile curses found in the ancient Near East, fn in which a curse is dramatized by some kind of symbolic action. fn

 

Such "simile curses," explicit or implied, are to be found in the Book of Mormon as well as elsewhere in the Old Testament. In Alma 46, Moroni called upon the people to take up arms against Amalickiah, in response to which they rent "their garments in token, or as a covenant, that they would not forsake the Lord their God; or, in other words, if they should transgress the commandments of God . . . the Lord should rend them even as they had rent their garments" (Alma 46:21). Similarly, one of Moroni's soldiers "smote off the scalp of Zerahemnah" and then "took up the scalp from off the ground by the hair, and laid it upon the point of his sword, and stretched it forth unto them, saying unto them with a loud voice: Even as this scalp has fallen to the earth, which is the scalp of your chief, so shall ye fall to the earth except ye will deliver up your weapons of war and depart with a covenant of peace" (Alma 44:13-14).

 

Ezekiel attacked all false human hopes (Ezek. 12:21-28; cf. 33:23-29), thereby preparing the ground for a hope based on God's own purposes (Ezek. 36:16-38). The people would no longer be able to repeat the proverb, as they had in the past, "The days are prolonged, and every vision faileth" (Ezek. 12:22). Ezekiel affirmed that God's words would be fulfilled and that there would not be a long delay in their fulfillment. Ezekiel also attacked the false prophets and diviners—men and women— who, through their lying oracles (which one commentator referred to as "whistling in the dark" fn), had given Judah hope that had ultimately failed. False prophets are mentioned several times in the Old Testament. Ahab had his own prophets, some four hundred of them, who "prophesied" according to their own wishful thinking (1 Kgs. 22:6). Zedekiah also had such court prophets, who opposed Jeremiah violently but were ultimately discomfited by him (see Jer. 27:12-18; 28:1-17).

 

Ezekiel's writing is suffused with a strong sense of the sovereignty of God and his direction of human history. God's activity in history includes judgment as well as salvation and is intended to bring the house of Israel and the nations to know that Jehovah is God. Because of Judah's repeated failure and sin, God had now resolved to destroy the nation. That decision was irrevocable (Ezek. 14:12-20; 21:1-7), and even Noah, Job, and Daniel (or Danel) would not be able to protect them from famine, dangerous animals, fn sword, and pestilence. Noah and Job were chosen as examples here because of their righteousness in their own generations. Noah, at least, was, through his righteousness, able to save his sons, his wife, and his daughters-in-law. Job, according to one tradition, brought his children back to life at the end of the story. fn The Daniel referred to here most likely is not the same individual who is mentioned in the book of Daniel, because he was roughly a contemporary of Ezekiel; however, this could be the Danel mentioned in the Ugaritic materials that have been discovered and translated during this century. According to the Aqhat legend from Ugarit, Danel was a wise and good king who pleaded with the gods, coupled with sacrifice and prayer, for a son. Finally, Baal was moved to relay his request to the supreme god El, and Danel's request was granted. When his son, Aqhat, attained manhood, he was given a bow by Kothar, the Canaanite blacksmith deity. Anat, the Canaanite goddess, desired the bow and asked Aqhat for it. He demurred, and Anat, in her rage, indirectly brought about his death. Although the Ugaritic tale is sketchy at this point, it appears likely that Danel, by his prayers, was able to restore his son to life. fn The point of these three figures that Ezekiel cited as examples would be that even if there were righteous men who had been able to preserve other generations, they would not be able to do so here.

 

Three Prophetic Allegories (Ezek. 15-17)

 

To strengthen in the minds of his readers the certainty of God's judgment against Judah, Ezekiel summarized the judgment and its reasons in three allegories. The first of these (chap. 15) concerns a wild vine. When compared with other trees of the forest, the wild vine has little use except as fuel for fire (Ezek. 15:1-5). Just as the wild vine was suitable only for the fire, so also was Israel suited only for the consuming flame of God's fire. God's determination and his faithfulness to his judgments would be shown in the destruction of Jerusalem and the desolation of the land, "because they have committed a trespass" (Ezek. 15:6-8).

 

With striking, graphic, sometimes shocking language, Ezekiel described Jerusalem and Judah as a harlot (chap. 16). Although carelessly treated at her birth in Canaan, she was treated kindly by God, who "spread his skirt" over her—a symbol of intention to marry (Ezek. 16:8). In preparation for that marriage, God said: "Then washed I thee with water; yea, I thoroughly washed away thy blood from thee, and I anointed thee with oil. I clothed thee also with broidered work, and shod thee with badger's skin, and I girded thee about with fine linen, and I covered thee with silk" (Ezek. 16:9-10). Washing, anointing, and clothing in preparation for marriage are mentioned elsewhere in the Old Testament (Ruth 3:3) and in other parts of the ancient Near East as well. fn Despite the marriage of the Lord and Judah, Judah proved herself constant only in her profligacy and unfaithfulness. For her adulteries, she would be punished.

 

By means of a third allegory (chap. 17), an explanation is given for God's judgment on Judah and Jerusalem. The allegory is presented in Ezekiel 17:1-10 and explained in 17:11-21. The historical background for the allusions in this chapter may be found in 2 Kings 24:6-20; 2 Chronicles 36:8-16; and Jeremiah 37; 52:1-17. An eagle (Nebuchadnezzar) broke off the top of the cedar (Jehoiachin of Judah) and brought it to the land and city of merchants (Babylon). The eagle (Nebuchadnezzar) took some of the seed of Judah and planted it, causing a vine to sprout (Zedekiah and those remaining in Judah). Soon, however, the vine began to incline toward a second eagle (Egypt) for nourishment. In the second part of the chapter a detailed explanation is given: the king of Babylon went to Jerusalem, bringing back the rightful king and nobles with him. In the absence of King Jehoiachin, the king of Babylon made a treaty with Zedekiah, one of the members of the royal family. Zedekiah soon rebelled against Nebuchadnezzar by sending his envoys to Egypt for an army. In response, the Lord declared that the Pharaoh will be of no value to Zedekiah, who will die in captivity in Babylon.

 

 

(Kent P. Jackson, ed., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 4: 1 Kings to Malachi [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1993], 285.)

 

 

We had a long discussion on agency, the natural man and the light of Christ.  Good and evil always have existed and always will exist, Satan did not create evil he fell to it, and he uses it to entice man toward evil, while the light of Christ entices man to do well.

 

The light of Christ strives with us for our good.  If there was only evil agency would not exist, it would be a wicked society and the children born into such a place would have no chance.

 

Agency is the power to act.  The Millennium will have both choices, good and evil, but the people will choose good thus bound Satan, at the end however some will choose evil and that ushers the end of the Millennium.

 

 

Free Choice


Free to Choose Good or Evil

2 Nephi 2

26 And the Messiah cometh in the fulness of time, that he may redeem the children of men from the fall. And because that they are redeemed from the fall they have become free forever, knowing good from evil; to act for themselves and not to be acted upon, save it be by the punishment of the law at the great and last day, according to the commandments which God hath given.

27 Wherefore, men are free according to the flesh; and all things are given them which are expedient unto man. And they are free to choose liberty and eternal life, through the great Mediator of all men, or to choose captivity and death, according to the captivity and power of the devil; for he seeketh that all men might be miserable like unto himself.

28 And now, my sons, I would that ye should look to the great Mediator, and hearken unto his great commandments; and be faithful unto his words, and choose eternal life, according to the will of his Holy Spirit;

29 And not choose eternal death, according to the will of the flesh and the evil which is therein, which giveth the spirit of the devil power to captivate, to bring you down to hell, that he may reign over you in his own kingdom. (Emphasis added)

Brigham Young

Many are disposed through their own wickedness "to do as I damned please," and they are damned. (Discourses of Brigham Young, p.65)

 

Purpose of Life is to Learn to Choose

Boyd K. Packer

We come into mortal life to receive a body and to be tested, to learn to choose. ("The Choice," Ensign, Nov. 1980, p. 21)

 

We Can Never Make A Choice Independent of Good or Evil Influences

Henry B. Eyring

They may mock and deride, as did a man named Korihor, with these words recorded in the Book of Mormon: "And thus ye lead away this people after the foolish traditions of your fathers, and according to your own desires; and ye keep them down, even as it were in bondage, that ye may glut yourselves with the labors of their hands, that they durst not look up with boldness, and that they durst not enjoy their rights and privileges" (Alma 30:27).

Korihor was arguing, as men and women have falsely argued from the beginning of time, that to take counsel from the servants of God is to surrender God-given rights of independence. But the argument is false because it misrepresents reality. When we reject the counsel which comes from God, we do not choose to be independent of outside influence. We choose another influence. We reject the protection of a perfectly loving, all-powerful, all-knowing Father in Heaven, whose whole purpose, as that of His Beloved Son, is to give us eternal life, to give us all that He has, and to bring us home again in families to the arms of His love. In rejecting His counsel, we choose the influence of another power, whose purpose is to make us miserable and whose motive is hatred. We have moral agency as a gift of God. Rather than the right to choose to be free of influence, it is the inalienable right to submit ourselves to whichever of those powers we choose. ("Finding Safety in Counsel," Ensign, May 1997, p. 25)

 

The Choice Between Good and Evil is the Most Important We Will Ever Make

Marion G. Romney

Let us never forget ... That we are here subject to opposing influences--the influence of Satan and his followers on the one hand, and the influence of Christ and his followers on the other hand;

That as we are being acted upon by these two influences, we are free "to choose liberty and eternal life, through the great Mediator of all men, or to choose captivity and death, according to the captivity and power of the devil." (2 Ne. 2:27.)

It is important that we keep in mind that the choices we make as we decide what is good and what is evil are the most important decisions we will ever make. Upon them depends our happiness or misery throughout time and eternity. ("The Voice of the Spirit," Ensign, Aug. 1978, p. 4)


Blessings If We Choose Right Punishments If We Choose Wrong

Neal A. Maxwell

Moral agency in the face of difficult choices was not for Adam and Eve alone (Moses 7:32; D&C 101:78). There are blessings if we choose aright and penalties if we choose wrongly. Therefore, attempting to stand between friends and the consequences of their wrong choices is not realistic; it is not nearly as useful as being lovingly at their sides before and when choices are being made. Men and women really are "free to choose" (2 Nephi 2:27), and we cannot and should not try to have it otherwise. (But for a Small Moment, p.130)



We Are Free To Choose Our Responses

Neal A. Maxwell

While we are not always free to choose just when and how all of life's interactions will occur, we are nevertheless free to choose our responses to these moments. ("The Pathway of Discipleship," Ensign, Sept. 1998, p. 10)

Marvin J. Ashton

In God's plan we are usually free to choose the changes we make in our lives and we are always free to choose how we will respond to the changes that come. ("Progress through Change," Ensign, Nov. 1979, p.61)


Our Choices May Effect the Next Generation

Neal A. Maxwell

All are free to choose, of course, and we would not have it otherwise. Unfortunately, however, when some choose slackness, they are choosing not only for themselves, but for the next generation and the next. Small equivocations in parents can produce large deviations in their children! Earlier generations in a family may have reflected dedication, while some in the current generation evidence equivocation. Sadly, in the next, some may choose dissension as erosion takes its toll. ("Settle This in Your Hearts," Ensign, Nov. 1992, pp. 65-66)


Our Choices Show What We Value

Boyd K. Packer

Our lives are made up of thousands of everyday choices. Over the years these little choices will be bundled together and show clearly what we value. ("The Choice," Ensign, Nov. 1980, p. 21)



Agency and Choice


Agency-A Gift From God


Moses 4

3 Wherefore, because that Satan rebelled against me, and sought to destroy the agency of man, which I, the Lord God, had given him . . .

Moses 7

32 The Lord said unto Enoch: Behold these thy brethren; they are the workmanship of mine own hands, and I gave unto them their knowledge, in the day I created them; and in the Garden of Eden, gave I unto man his agency;

D&C 101

78 That every man may act in doctrine and principle pertaining to futurity, according to the moral agency which I have given unto him, that every man may be accountable for his own sins in the day of judgment.



Agency, The Foundation Principle

 

Marion G. Romney

I purpose to make a few remarks about the foundation principle upon which the gospel of Jesus Christ is built, the principle of agency. (Conference Report, October 1968, p.64)


Agency Is an Eternal Principle

Brigham Young

The volition of the creature is free; this is a law of their existence and the Lord cannot violate his own law; were he to do that, he would cease to be God. He has placed life and death before his children, and it is for them to choose. If they choose life, they receive the blessing of life; if they choose death, they must abide the penalty. This is a law which has always existed from all eternity, and will continue to exist throughout all the eternities to come. Every intelligent being must have the power of choice, and God brings forth the results of the acts of his creatures to promote his Kingdom and subserve his purposes in the salvation and exaltation of his children. (Discourses of Brigham Young, p.62)

 

Agency - The Power to Act

2 Nephi 2

14 And now, my sons, I speak unto you these things for your profit and learning; for there is a God, and he hath created all things, both the heavens and the earth, and all things that in them are, both things to act and things to be acted upon. (emphasis added)

Dictionary Definitions of Agency

Oxford English Dictionary - The faculty of an agent or of acting; active working or operation; action, activity.

Webster's Collegiate Dictionary-Faculty or state of acting or of exercising power; action.

Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, 11 ed.-The capacity, condition, or state of action or of exerting power.

Dictionary of Sociology - The term agency is usually juxtaposed to structure and is often no more than a synonym for action, emphasizing implicitly the undetermined nature of human action, as opposed to the alleged determinism of structural theories.

Agency - the Power to Do According to Our Own Will

Mosiah 2

God "has created you from the beginning, and is preserving you from day to day, by lending you breath, that ye may live and move and do according to your own will" (verse 21; emphasis added)

Alma 12

31 Wherefore, he gave commandments unto men, they having first transgressed the first commandments as to things which were temporal, and becoming as Gods, knowing good from evil, placing themselves in a state to act, or being placed in a state to act according to their wills and pleasures, whether to do evil or to do good- (emphasis added)

Joseph Fielding Smith

This great gift of agency, that is the privilege given to man to make his own choice, has never been revoked, and it never will be. It is an eternal principle giving freedom of thought and action to every soul. No person, by any decree of the Father, has ever been compelled to do good; no person has ever been forced to do evil. Each may act for himself. It was Satan's plan to destroy this agency and force men to do his will. There could be no satisfactory existence without this great gift. Men must have the privilege to choose even to the extent that they may rebel against the divine decrees. Of course salvation and exaltation must come through the free will without coercion and by individual merit in order that righteous rewards may be given and proper punishment be meted out to the transgressor. Therefore, when the great day of the Lord shall come, the wicked who have merited banishment from a righteous government will be consumed, or the privilege of continuance on the earth will be denied. (Answers to Gospel Questions, 2:20; emphasis added)

Agency - The Power to Choose and Act

Marion G. Romney

Free agency means the freedom and power to choose and act. Next to life itself, it is man's most precious inheritance. ("Church Welfare Services' Basic Principles," Ensign, May 1976, p. 120)


Agency Given to Choose and Act On Good or Evil Choices

Gordon B. Hinckley

Mankind has been given agency to choose between right and wrong. ("Reverence and Morality," Ensign, May 1987, 47)

Boyd K. Packer

We want our children and their children to know that the choice of life is not between fame and obscurity, nor is the choice between wealth and poverty. The choice is between good and evil, and that is a very different matter indeed. ("The Choice," Ensign, Nov. 1980, p. 21)

Joseph B. Wirthlin

The Father's plan gave us our agency to choose right or wrong, good or evil so we can learn, develop, and progress. ("Deep Roots," Ensign, Nov. 1994, p. 75)

David B. Haight

We have our agency to choose right from wrong, good from evil. But just because evil exists does not mean that we must partake of it. You cannot do wrong and feel right. ("A Time for Preparation," Ensign, Nov. 1991, p. 37)

Dallin H. Oaks

When I say free agency I refer to what the scripture calls agency, which means an exercise of the will, the power to choose. ("Free Agency and Freedom," in The Book of Mormon: Second Nephi, The Doctrinal Structure [Eds. Monte S. Nyman and Charles D. Tate, Jr. Religious Studies Center, BYU, Provo Utah, 1989] p. 1)

Howard W. Hunter

Today, I would like to address both groups, members of our church as well as others, about one of the most important tenets of our faith and one of the most precious of God's gifts to mankind. It is our freedom, our agency, our inalienable and divine right to choose what we will believe and what we will not believe, and to choose what we want to be and what we want to do. I wish to speak of our responsibility and our opportunity to choose God, and the good, and eternal life; or to select evil, the destructive, and that which leads to painful misery and despair. ("The Golden Thread of Choice," Ensign, Nov. 1989, p. 17)

Neal A. Maxwell

The vital revelations about the agency of man-our freedom to choose-inevitably disclose the perfect generosity and justice of God. ("Free to Choose," in Moving in His Majesty& Power [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 2004], pp. 1-2)

Dallin H. Oaks

God has given us agency--the power to choose between good (the path of life) and evil (the path of spiritual death and destruction.("Same-Gender Attraction," Ensign, Oct. 1995, p. 8)


Good and Evil Is Determined By God Not Man

Spencer W. Kimball

You probably think you have found a new freedom: to think wholly for yourself, to make wholly your own determinations, to criticize and decide for yourself what is right and wrong. That was decided eternities ago. Right and wrong are not to be determined by you or me. Those elements were decided for us before our birth. We have the free agency to do the right or do the wrong, but who are we to alter those changeless things? We can scoff at sacred things, express our own little opinions, but remember that millions of men and women with keener minds than ours, with more erudite training than yours and mine, have said things and done things more startling, more ugly, more skeptical than you or I could think of. Millions have gone down the path you are entering. They have all come to grief or will ultimately. Shall the violin say to Tony Stradivarius, "You did not make me"? Shall the created thing question the creator? ... (The Teachings of Spencer W. Kimball, p.160)

Richard G. Scott

Please understand, no one has the privilege to choose what is right. God reserved that prerogative to Himself. ("Healing Your Damaged Life," Ensign, Nov. 1992, p. 61)

 

Our Choices Can Never Be Independent of Good or Evil Influences

Henry B. Eyring

Korihor was arguing, as men and women have falsely argued from the beginning of time, that to take counsel from the servants of God is to surrender God-given rights of independence. But the argument is false because it misrepresents reality. When we reject the counsel which comes from God, we do not choose to be independent of outside influence. We choose another influence. We reject the protection of a perfectly loving, all-powerful, all-knowing Father in Heaven, whose whole purpose, as that of His Beloved Son, is to give us eternal life, to give us all that He has, and to bring us home again in families to the arms of His love. In rejecting His counsel, we choose the influence of another power, whose purpose is to make us miserable and whose motive is hatred. We have moral agency as a gift of God. Rather than the right to choose to be free of influence, it is the inalienable right to submit ourselves to whichever of those powers we choose. ("Finding Safety in Counsel," Ensign, May 1997, p. 25)

Choice Brings Consequences

Gordon B. Hinckley

I repeat, each of us has a choice between right and wrong. But with that choice there inevitably will follow consequences. ("Reverence and Morality," Ensign, May 1987, p. 47)

Boyd K. Packer

In mortality men are free to choose, and each choice begets a consequence. ("Atonement, Agency, Accountability," Ensign, May 1988, p.71)



God-Not Man-Determines Consequences of Actions

Brigham Young

Our Father controls the results of our acts at his own pleasure, and we cannot prevent it. Man can produce and control his own acts, but he has no control over their results. God causes even the wrath of man to praise him, to redound to his glory and the salvation of his children. (Discourses of Brigham Young, p.63)

He has given them the privilege of choosing for themselves, whether it be good or evil; but the results of our choice is still in his hand. All his children have the right of making a path for themselves of walking to the right or to the left, or telling the truth or that which is not true. This right God has given to all people who dwell on the earth, and they can legislate and act as they please; but God holds them in his hands, and he will bring forth the results of his glory, and for the benefit of those who love and serve him, and he will make the wrath of men to praise him. All of us are in the hands of that God. (Discourses of Brigham Young, p.62)

 

Joseph B. Wirthlin

The Lord has given you the gift of agency (see Moses 7:32) and instructed you sufficiently to know good from evil (see 2 Ne. 2:5). You are free to choose (see 2 Ne. 2:27) and are permitted to act (see 2 Ne. 10:23; Hel. 14:30), but you are not free to choose the consequences. With absolute certainty, choices of good and right lead to happiness and peace, while choices of sin and evil eventually lead to unhappiness, sorrow, and misery. ("Running Your Marathon," Ensign, Nov. 1989, p. 75)

Richard G. Scott

Yes, moral agency allows you to choose what you will, but you cannot control the outcome of those choices. Unlike the false creations of man, our Father in Heaven determines the consequences of your choices. Obedience will yhield happiness, while ciolation of His commandments will not. ("How To Live Well Amid Increasing Evil," Ensign, May 2004, pp. 100-103)

The secret to solve problems in your life will be found in understanding and using the eternally beneficial interaction of your agency and [God's] truth.

The Master said: "He that keepeth [the] commandments receiveth truth and light. …

"Light and truth forsake that evil one

"And that wicked one cometh and taketh away light and truth, through disobedience, from the children of men." (D&C 93:28, 37, 39; emphasis added.)

He also declared, "Every man may act in doctrine and principle, … according to the moral agency which I have given unto him, that every man may be accountable … in the day of judgment" (D&C 101:78; italics added).

These scriptures teach how to overcome the effects of wrong choices, whether they be lying, stealing, gambling, addiction to alcohol or drugs, immorality, inflicting abuse, or anything like it. Simply stated, one must use his agency to obey truth.

When others give you advice, have you ever said, "I just don't believe the way you do. Those are your standards and your principles. I have my own"? Please understand that no one can change truth. Rationalization, overpowering self-interest, all of the arguments of men, anger, or self-will cannot change truth. Satan knows that, so he tries to create an atmosphere where one unwittingly begins to feel that he can not only choose what to do, but can determine what is right to do. Satan strives to persuade us to live outside truth by rationalizing our actions as the right of choice.

But our Eternal Father defined truth and established what is right and wrong before the creation of this earth. He also fixed the consequences of obedience and disobedience to those truths. He defended our right to choose our path in life so that we would grow, develop, and be happy, but we do not have the right to choose the consequences of our acts. Those who willfully, consistently disobey His commandments will inevitably learn that truth. Joseph Smith was inspired to record, "When we obtain any blessing from God, it is by obedience to that law upon which it is predicated." (D&C 130:21.)

Please understand, no one has the privilege to choose what is right. God reserved that prerogative to Himself. Our agency does allow us to choose among alternate paths, but then we are bound to the consequence God has decreed. Later, if we don't like where the path takes us, the only out is through repentance. ("Healing Your Damaged Life," Ensign, Nov. 1992, p. 61)

 

Not Free To Alter Consequences

Ezra Taft Benson

We are free to choose, but we are not free to alter the consequences of those choices. (Teachings of Ezra Taft Benson, p.382)



Not Free to Escape Consequences of Exercised Agency

Spencer W. Kimball

Of course we can choose; the free agency is ours, but we cannot escape the consequences of our choice. (The Teachings of Spencer W. Kimball, p.195)

Men have free agency, as the Lord has made clear. They may do right or wrong but they cannot escape the responsibility of answering for their errors if they are normal individuals. (The Teachings of Spencer W. Kimball, p.159)

Russell M. Nelson

Often, however, agency is misunderstood. While we are free to choose, once we have made those choices, we are tied to the consequences of those choices. ("Addiction or Freedom," Ensign, Nov. 1988, p. 7)

We are free to think. We are free to plan. And then we are free to do. But once an action has been taken, we are never free from its consequences. ... To clarify this concept, we can learn from the astronaut. Any time during the selection process, planning, and preparation, he is free to withdraw. But once the powerful rocket fuel is ignited, he is no longer free to choose. Now he is bound by the consequences of his choice. Even if difficulties develop and he might wish otherwise, the choice made was sealed by action. ("Reverence for Life," Ensign, May 1985, 13)

Boyd K. Packer

Life is meant to be a test to see if we will keep the commandments of God. (See 2 Ne. 2:5.) We are free to obey or to ignore the spirit and the letter of the law. But the agency granted to man is a moral agency. (See D&C 101:78.) We are not free to break our covenants and escape the consequences. ("Covenants," Ensign, Nov. 1990, p. 84)

Neal A. Maxwell

There is always at least one victim of iniquity. Yes, I am free to choose, but I can neither be immune from the consequences of my wrong choices nor avoid accountability. ("Free to Choose," in Moving in His Majesty& Power [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 2004], pp. 1-2)


Consequences to Agency Reach Even to Our Desires

Dallin H. Oaks

God's law can assign consequences solely on the basis of our innermost thoughts and desires. There is no uncertainty in the administration of this law. As Ammon taught King Lamoni, God "looketh down upon all the children of men; and he knows all the thoughts and intents of the heart; for by his hand were they all created from the beginning." (Alma 18:32.)

Similarly, Paul warned the Hebrews that God "is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart," and "all things are naked and opened unto the eyes of him." (Heb. 4:12-13.)

In other words, God judges us not only for our acts, but also for the desires of our hearts. He has said so again and again. This is a challenging reality, but it is not surprising. Agency and accountability are eternal principles. We exercise our free agency not only by what we do, but also by what we decide, or will, or desire. Restrictions on freedom can deprive us of the power to do, but no one can deprive us of the power to will or desire. Accountability must therefore reach and attach consequences to the desires of our hearts. (“The Desires of Our Hearts," Ensign, June 1986, pp. 64-65)

 

Agency in Pre-mortality

Howard W. Hunter

There are, of course, those who, in bitterness and disbelief, have rejected the idea of an independent spirit in man that is capable of free will and choice and true liberty.

We declare a bright and glorious view of God and man to all who will hear, a view revealed in and illuminated by the restored light of the gospel of Jesus Christ. We testify of God's loving goodness and of his eternal respect for each of us, for us as individual children of God and for what each of us may become.

As our prophet leader, President Ezra Taft Benson has declared, "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints proclaims that life is eternal, that it has purpose. … [God has a] plan … for the benefit and blessing of us, His children. …

"Basic to [that] all-important plan is our free agency. …

"The right of choice … runs like a golden thread throughout the gospel … for the blessing of His children." (The Teachings of Ezra Taft Benson, Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1988, pp. 80-81.)

Part of our reassurance about the free, noble, and progressing spirit of man comes from the glorious realization that we all existed and had our identities, and our agency, long before we came to this world. To some that will be a new thought, but the Bible teaches clearly just such an eternal view of life, a life stretching back before this world was and stretching forward into the eternities ahead.

God said to Jeremiah, "Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee, and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations." (Jer. 1:5.) At another time God reminded Job that "all the sons of God shouted for joy" (Job 38:7) before there was yet any man or woman on the earth God was creating. The Apostle Paul taught that God the Father chose us "before the foundation of the world." (Eph. 1:4.)

Where and when did all of this happen? Well, it happened long before man's mortal birth. It happened in a great premortal existence where we developed our identities and increased our spiritual capabilities by exercising our agency and making important choices. We developed our intelligence and learned to love the truth, and we prepared to come to earth to continue our progress.

Our Father in Heaven wanted our growth to continue in mortality and to be enhanced by our freedom to choose and learn. He also wanted us to exercise our faith and our will, especially with a new physical body to master and control. But we know from both ancient and modern revelation that Satan wished to deny us our independence and agency in that now-forgotten moment long ago, even as he wishes to deny them this very hour. Indeed, Satan violently opposed the freedom of choice offered by the Father, so violently that John in the Revelation described "war in heaven" (Rev. 12:7) over the matter. Satan would have coerced us, and he would have robbed us of that most precious of gifts if he could: our freedom to choose a divine future and the exaltation we all hope to obtain.

Through Christ and his valiant defense of our Father's plan, the course of agency and eternal aspirations prevailed. In that crucial, premortal setting, a major milestone was passed, a monumental victory was won. As a result, we would be allowed to continue to pursue what President David O. McKay once described as the "eternal principle of progress." Later Christ himself would come to earth, President McKay noted, "to perfect society by perfecting the individual and only by the exercising of Free Agency can the individual even approach perfection." (In Conference Report, Apr. 1940, p. 118). [Howard W. Hunter, "The Golden Thread of Choice," Ensign, Nov. 1989, p. 18]

 

 

We can’t blame all our sins on Satan, the natural man within us can also choose good or evil (2 Nephi 2:27-29).

 

Our spirit versus the natural man, the spirit is our real self.  Satan tries to create an evil environment to entice us, he is trying to strengthen the natural man, and he manipulates the environment to get us to fall.

 

A person who has been spiritually reborn still has evil tendencies, yet they seek a righteous environment which strengthens the spirit over the natural man, it can become a celestial environment.

 

(Mosiah 3:19.)

 

19 For the natural man is an enemy to God, and has been from the fall of Adam, and will be, forever and ever, unless he yields to the enticings of the Holy Spirit, and putteth off the natural man and becometh a saint through the atonement of Christ the Lord, and becometh as a child, submissive, meek, humble, patient, full of love, willing to submit to all things which the Lord seeth fit to inflict upon him, even as a child doth submit to his father.

 

 

The Persistence of the Natural Man



___________________________________________

Though it is true that that natural man can be "put off" and men become "a saint" -- or a spiritual man (Mosiah 3:19) -- this does not mean that the natural man or the flesh is "dead".  We must be careful to recognize the persistence of the natural man.  Note the following statements:


Neal A. Mawell

  • Christ’s Atonement, of course, is for super sinners and the midrange sinners and then good people who make a lot of mistakes but are not wicked! Each of these acts of drawing upon the Atonement requires us to put off the natural man.  I am persuaded that so much of taking up the cross daily –- daily, not quarterly or semiannually –- consists of putting off the natural man (see Mosiah 3:19). Doing this involves some arduous isometrics -– the old man working against the new spiritual man. That natural man, as you know, will not go quietly or easily. And even when he is put off, he has a way of hanging around, hoping to throw his saddle on us once again. (The Holy Ghost: Glorifying Christ, Ensign, July 2002, p. 56)
  • As you pursue your discipleship and observe the human scene, do not be surprised or unnerved by the natural man’s relentless push for preeminence and power. (“The Pathway of Discipleship,” Ensign, Sept. 1998, p. 13) 
  • Nor does the natural man or the natural woman go away quietly or easily. Hence the most grinding form of calisthenics we will ever know involves the individual isometrics required to put off the natural man. Time and again, the new self is pitted against the stubborn old self. Sometimes, just when at last we think the job is done, the old self reminds us that he or she has not fully departed yet. (“Becoming a Disciple,” Ensign, June 1996, p. 15)

 

Brigham Young

  • As I have told you, your spirit is continually warring with the flesh; your spirit dictates one way, your flesh suggests another, and this brings on the combat. (Journal of Discourses, 3:212)
  • When we receive the Gospel, a warfare commences immediately; Paul says, "for I delight in the law of God, after the inward man," but I see another law in my members warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members." We have to fight continually, as it were, sword in hand to make the spirit master of the tabernacle, or the flesh subject to the law of the spirit. If this warfare is not diligently prosecuted, then the law of sin prevails, and in consequence of this some apostatize from the truth when crossing the plains, learn to swear instead of to pray, become high-minded and high tempered instead of learning to be patient and humble, and when they arrive in these vallies they feel so self-sufficient that they consider themselves the only ones that are really right; they are filled with darkness, the authority of the Spirit is not listened to, and the law of sin and death is the ruling power in their tabernacles. (Journal of Discourses, 9:287-288)


If you take away the light of Christ you have an evil environment, you will do evil.  Agency is lost in that society, it’s like Sodom and Jerusalem during Jeremiah’s time.

 

(Moses 8:17.)

 

17 And the Lord said unto Noah: My Spirit shall not always strive with man, for he shall know that all flesh shall die; yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years; and if men do not repent, I will send in the floods upon them.

 

 

(Mormon 2:13-15.)

 

13 But behold this my joy was vain, for their sorrowing was not unto repentance, because of the goodness of God; but it was rather the sorrowing of the damned, because the Lord would not always suffer them to take happiness in sin.

 

14 And they did not come unto Jesus with broken hearts and contrite spirits, but they did curse God, and wish to die. Nevertheless they would struggle with the sword for their lives.

 

15 And it came to pass that my sorrow did return unto me again, and I saw that the day of grace was passed with them, both temporally and spiritually; for I saw thousands of them hewn down in open rebellion against their God, and heaped up as dung upon the face of the land. And thus three hundred and forty and four years had passed away.

 

 

Keep yourself in a righteous environment, it strengthens the spirit and weakens the natural man, surround yourself and your family with a righteous atmosphere.

 

The hope was with those who had been scattered, the Lord will work with them to bring them back.

 

Look how the older children of Lehi and Ishmael acted by losing the light of Christ versus the younger children.  Lehi had to get his family out of Jerusalem if he hoped to save them.

 

 

(1 Nephi 7:14-15.)

 

14 For behold, the Spirit of the Lord ceaseth soon to strive with them; for behold, they have rejected the prophets, and Jeremiah have they cast into prison. And they have sought to take away the life of my father, insomuch that they have driven him out of the land.

 

15 Now behold, I say unto you that if ye will return unto Jerusalem ye shall also perish with them. And now, if ye have choice, go up to the land, and remember the words which I speak unto you, that if ye go ye will also perish; for thus the Spirit of the Lord constraineth me that I should speak.

 

 

Look at Ether the only one with the light of Christ during the end of the Jaredites.  Satan seeks all men to be miserable like himself.  He seeks the total destruction of all.

 

Bruce went into great detail on the Light of Christ to a question by a student, it took the majority of class.

 

 

Teachings Concerning
The Light of Christ


Bruce R. McConkie

There is a spirit - the Spirit of the Lord, the Spirit of Christ, the light of truth, the light of Christ - that defies description and is beyond mortal comprehension. It is in us and in all things; it is around us and around all things; it fills the earth and the heavens and the universe. It is everywhere, in all immensity, without exception; it is an indwelling, immanent, ever-present, never-absent spirit. It has neither shape nor form nor personality. It is not an entity nor a person nor a personage. It has no agency, does not act independently, and exists not to act but to be acted upon. As far as we know, it has no substance and is not material, at least as we measure these things. It is variously described as light and life and law and truth and power. It is the light of Christ; it is the life that is in all things; it is the law by which all things are governed; it is truth shining forth in darkness; it is the power of God who sitteth upon his throne. It may be that it is also priesthood and faith and omnipotence, for these too are the power of God.

This light of truth or light of Christ is seen in the light of the luminaries of heaven; it is the power by which the sun, moon, and stars, and the earth itself are made. It is the light that proceedeth forth from the presence of God to fill the immensity of space." It is "the light which is in all things, which giveth life to all things, which is the law by which all things are governed, even the power of God who sitteth upon his throne, who is in the bosom of eternity, who is in the midst of all things." It is the agency of God's power; it is the means and way whereby "he comprehendeth all things," so that "all things are before him, and all (A New Witness for the Articles of Faith, pp. 257-258)

 

First Presidency Statement (Joseph F. Smith, Anthon H. Lund, Charles W. Penrose)

There is a universally diffused essence which is the light and life of the world, which proceedeth forth from the presence of God throughout the immensity of space, the light and power of which God bestows in different degrees to "them that ask him," according to their faith and obedience, but the Holy Ghost, which Christ said He would send to His apostles from the Father (John 14:26) was and is a "personage of spirit," and was not to come until Christ went away (John 16:7). Also the endowment from that divine being, the third person in the Holy Trinity, called "the gift of the Holy Ghost," is a special blessing sealed upon baptized repentant believers in Jesus Christ, and is "an abiding witness." The spirit of God may be enjoyed as a temporary influence by which divine light and power come to mankind for special purposes and occasions. But the gift of the Holy Ghost, which was received by the apostles on the day of Pentecost, and is bestowed in confirmation, is a permanent witness and higher endowment than the ordinary manifestation of the Holy Spirit. (Messages of the First Presidency, Vol.5, p.4)

 

From True to the Faith: A Gospel Reference (Published by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 2004)

The Light of Christ "proceedeth forth from the presence of God to fill the immensity of space." It is "the light which is in all things, which giveth life to all things, which is the law by which all things are governed" (D&C 88:12-13; see also D&C 88:6-11). This power is an influence for good in the lives of all people (see John 1:9; D&C 93:2). In the scriptures, the Light of Christ is sometimes called the Spirit of the Lord, the Spirit of God, the Spirit of Christ, or the Light of Life.

The Light of Christ should not be confused with the Holy Ghost. It is not a personage, as the Holy Ghost is. Its influence leads people to find the true gospel, be baptized, and receive the gift of the Holy Ghost (see John 12:46; Alma 26:14-15).

Conscience is a manifestation of the Light of Christ, enabling us to judge good from evil. The prophet Mormon taught: "The Spirit of Christ is given to every man, that he may know good from evil; wherefore, I show unto you the way to judge; for every thing which inviteth to do good, and to persuade to believe in Christ, is sent forth by the power and gift of Christ; wherefore ye may know with a perfect knowledge it is of God. … And now, my brethren, seeing that ye know the light by which ye may judge, which light is the light of Christ, see that ye do not judge wrongfully; for with that same judgment which ye judge ye shall also be judged" Moroni 7:16, Moroni 7:18). [p. 96]

 

Joseph F. Smith

The Holy Ghost as a personage of Spirit can no more be omnipresent in person than can the Father or the Son, but by his intelligence, his knowledge, his power and influence, over and through the laws of nature, he is and can be omnipresent throughout all the works of God. It is not the Holy Ghost who in person lighteth every man who is born into the world, but it is the light of Christ, the Spirit of Truth, which proceeds from the source of intelligence, which permeates all nature, which lighteth every man and fills the immensity of space. You may call it the Spirit of God, you may call it the influence of God's intelligence, you may call it the substance of his power, no matter what it is called, it is the spirit of intelligence that permeates the universe and gives to the spirits of men understanding, just as Job has said. (Job 32:8; Doc. and Cov. 88:3-13.) [Gospel Doctrine, p.61]

 

Joseph Fielding Smith

  • President Joseph F. Smith has expressed it thus: "The Holy Ghost as a personage of Spirit can no more be omnipresent in person than can the Father or the Son, but by his intelligence, his knowledge, his power and influence, over and through the laws of nature, he is and can be omnipresent throughout all the works of God." Thus when it becomes necessary to speak to us, he is able to do so by acting through the other Spirit, that is, through the Light of Christ. (Doctrines of Salvation, 1:40)
  • LIGHT OF CHRIST IS THE POWER OF GOD. This Light of Christ is not a personage. It has no body. I do not know what it is as far as substance is concerned; but it fills the immensity of space and emanates from God. It is the light by which the worlds are controlled, by which they are made. It is the light of the sun and all other bodies. It is the light which gives life to vegetation. It quickens the understanding of men, and has these various functions as set forth in these verses.  It is: "The light which is in all things, which giveth life to all things, which is the law by which all things are governed, even the power of God who sitteth upon his throne, who is in the bosom of eternity, who is in the midst of all things." This is our explanation in regard to the Spirit of Christ, or Light of Truth, which every man receives and is guided by. Unless a man had the blessings that come from this Spirit, his mind would not be quickened; there would be no vegetation grow; the worlds would not stay in their orbits; because it is through this Spirit of Truth, this Light of Truth, according to this revelation, that all these things are done. (Doctrines of Salvation, 1:52)
  • THE HOLY GHOST WORKS THROUGH THE LIGHT OF CHRIST. The person of the Holy Ghost can work through the Spirit of Christ that permeates everything, or he can work by personal contacts. The Holy Ghost can act through some other influence or force. This may be a crude illustration, and yet I think it answers our purpose. We have in this building a young lady sitting down at the switchboard. Someone on this floor wants to get in touch with someone on the second floor; somebody else in another part of the building wants to talk with someone in another building; and so on. They are all connected with the parties they want to talk to. In a similar way the Holy Ghost could speak to someone here, someone over there, and someone way off in some other part of the country, even in a foreign land, and each receive the message intended for him. That is not hard to understand when we think of telegraphy. They send several messages over a wire at the same time. Radio stations send messages of different wave lengths all over the earth. (Doctrines of Salvation, 1:54)
  • INVENTIONS COME BY SPIRIT OF LORD. There has never been a step taken from that day to this, in discovery or invention, where the Spirit of the Lord (that is, the spirit of which Joel spoke, the Light of Christ, not the Holy Ghost!) was not the prevailing force, resting upon the individual, which caused him to make the discovery or the invention. The world does not understand that but it is perfectly clear to me; nor did the Lord always use those who have faith, nor does he always do so today. He uses such minds as are pliable and can be turned in certain directions to accomplish his work, whether they believe in him or not. (Doctrines of Salvation, 1:178)
  • INVENTORS USED BY THE LORD. Now, do you think that these discoveries and inventions by Marconi, by Edison, by Bell, by Stephenson and by the other inventors and discoverers without naming them, have come just because these men have been sitting down and concentrating their minds upon these matters and have discovered them through their thought or accidentally? Not in the least, but the Spirit of the Lord, the Light of Christ, has been back of it, and has been impelling them to do these very things; and why? Because the time is here; it is ripe. We are ready for these discoveries, these inventions, and they all have a bearing upon the restoration of the gospel and preparation for the time which is yet future, but which is shortly to come, when Christ shall reign on the earth, and for a thousand years peace shall be established. That is what it is all for. Now, a man like Edison may say, "I do not believe in a supreme being." I do not know whether he does or not; some of these men do not. However, the Lord in his great mercy, overlooks that and uses the man because he is adapted to a certain work, and he, through his Spirit, can inspire this man to do this great work, and so he goes ahead and does it, all for the establishment of the kingdom of God. (Doctrines of Salvation, 1:180-181)
     

Richard G. Scott

The ability to have an unsettled conscience is a gift of God to help you succeed in this mortal life. It results principally from the influence of the Light of Christ on your mind and heart. The Light of Christ is that divine power or influence that emanates from God through Jesus Christ [see Topical Guide, "Light of Christ," p. 290]. It gives light and life to all things. It prompts all rational individuals throughout the earth to distinguish truth from error, right from wrong. It activates your conscience [see Moroni 7:16]. Its influence can be weakened through transgression and addiction and restored through proper repentance. The Light of Christ is not a person. It is a power and influence that comes from God and when followed can lead a person to qualify for the guidance and inspiration of the Holy Ghost [see John 1:9; D&C 84:46-47]. ("Peace of Conscience and Peace of Mind," Ensign, Nov. 2004, p. 15)

 

Joseph B. Wirthlin

As the sun gives life and light to the earth, a spiritual light gives nourishment to our spirits. We call this the Light of Christ. The scriptures teach us that it "lighteth every man that cometh into the world" (John 1:9; see also Moro. 7:16; D&C 84:46). Thus, all mankind can enjoy its blessings. The Light of Christ is the divine influence that allows every man, woman, and child to distinguish between good and evil. It encourages all to choose the right, to seek eternal truth, and to learn again the truths that we knew in our premortal existence but have forgotten in mortality.

The Light of Christ should not be confused with the personage of the Holy Ghost, for the Light of Christ is not a personage at all. Its influence is preliminary to and preparatory to one's receiving the Holy Ghost. The Light of Christ will lead the honest soul to "hearkeneth to the voice" (D&C 84:46) to find the true gospel and the true Church and thereby receive the Holy Ghost. ("The Unspeakable Gift," Ensign, May 2003, p. 26)

 In the endowmwnt we learn how to control the light. We learned how to control it in pre mortality and we learn more and more in phases of how to control the light.  We will learn a lot more about this in the Millennium.  To be God and Goddesses we must learn how to control this light perfectly.  God is God because He controls this power perfectly.

D&C 88 and 93 Light = Truth, Intelligence, life, law, power.  The various kingdoms control the light according to their obedience and knowledge.  Fulness and perfection are only found in the highest degree of the Celectial kingdom, you must keep that law of each kingdom to receive the light of each kingdom, various levels according to our obedience to that kingdoms laws. 

Sons of Perdition have no light no glory, nothing, a sad state of affairs.

Ezekiel sees the glory leave the temple and Jerusalem this = the light of Christ leaving the temple and the city.

 

Bruce discussed briefly the relationship between the symbolism of Ezekiel and the book of Revelation.  Early Christians only had the Old Testament so they knew this relationship well.  We as a church need to study the OT much more then we do, it helps explain all of the other scriptures we have.

The Light of Christ

President Marion G. Romney
Conference Report, Apr. 1977, p. 59-63;
or Ensign, May 1977, p. 43-45

My brethren, I pray, and ask you to join in that prayer, that while I speak we will enjoy the Spirit of Christ. If we don't enjoy it, we won't enjoy these remarks, because my topic is "The Light of Christ." There are three phases of the light of Christ that I want to mention.

The first one is the light which enlighteneth every man that cometh into the world;
The second phase is the gift of the Holy Ghost;
And the third is the more sure word of prophecy.

The Light of Christ

In the eighty-eighth section of the Doctrine and Covenants, the Lord says, "The light of Christ . . . proceedeth forth from the presence of God to fill the immensity of space." (Vv. 7, 12 [D&C 88:7, 12].)

In another revelation, it is written that this light, which is "the Spirit of Jesus Christ . . . giveth light to every man that cometh into the world; and the Spirit enlighteneth every man through the world, that hearkeneth to the voice of the Spirit." (D&C 84:45­46.)

This Spirit is, no doubt, the source of one's conscience, which Webster defines as "a knowledge or feeling of right and wrong with a compulsion to do right."

Mormon was alluding to this Spirit when he wrote to his son Moroni that "every thing which inviteth and enticeth [CR, p. 60] to do good, and to love God, and to serve him, is inspired of God.

"Wherefore, take heed, my beloved brethren, that ye do not judge that which is evil to be of God, or that which is good and of God to be of the devil.

"For behold, my brethren, it is given unto you to judge, [and that gift is because the light of Christ enlighteneth every man that cometh into the world], that ye may know good from evil; and the way to judge is as plain, that ye may know with a perfect knowledge, as the daylight is from the dark night.

"For behold, the Spirit of Christ is given to every man that he may know good from evil." (Moro. 7:13­16 [Moroni 7:13­16] .)

President Joseph F. Smith says that this Spirit of Christ "strives with . . . men, and will continue to strive with them [if they will resist the enticings of Satan], until it brings them to a knowledge of the truth and the possession of the greater light and testimony of the Holy Ghost." (Gospel Doctrine, Deseret Book Co., 1973, pp. 67­68.)
 

Gift of the Holy Ghost

Now, this statement of President Smith's brings us to a consideration of the second phase of our subject: the gift of the Holy Ghost.

The Holy Ghost is a person, a [Ensign, p. 44] spirit, the third member of the Godhead. He is a messenger and a witness of the Father and the Son. He brings to men testimony, witness, and knowledge of God the Father, Jesus Christ His Son, and the truths of the gospel. He vitalizes truth in the hearts and souls of men.

"There is a difference," said the Prophet Joseph Smith, "between the Holy Ghost and the gift of the Holy Ghost. Cornelius received the Holy Ghost before he was baptized, which was the convincing power of God unto him of the truth of the Gospel, but he could not receive the gift of the Holy Ghost until after he was baptized. Had he not [been baptized], the Holy Ghost which convinced him of the truth of God, would have left him." (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p. 199.) That's not my statement; that's the statement of the Prophet Joseph Smith. But I know it's true.

The gift of the Holy Ghost confers upon one, as long as he is worthy, the right to receive light and truth.

Obtaining the gift of the Holy Ghost is preceded by faith, repentance, and baptism. Retaining the spirit, power, and guidance of the Holy Ghost requires a righteous life--a dedicated effort to constantly comply with the laws and ordinances of the gospel.
 

Member of the Godhead

The Holy Ghost is, as we have said, the third member of the Godhead. Of Him the Prophet Joseph said:

"The Holy Ghost has not a body of flesh and bones [as we know that God and Jesus Christ have], but is a personage of Spirit." (D&C 130:22.)

The Holy Ghost is the great witness of, the messenger for, and testifier of the Father and the Son. The Savior, speaking of Him as the "Spirit of truth," said:

"When he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come.

"He shall glorify me: for he shall receive of mine, and shall shew it unto you." (John 16:13­14.)

By the witness and power of the Holy Ghost we receive personal testimonies of the truths of the gospel, including knowledge of God the Father and His beloved Son, Jesus Christ, our Savior and Redeemer.

Notwithstanding the availability of the gifts of the Holy Ghost, there are many people who live within reach of them who fail to see them. Concerning such tragedy, the Lord said:

"Behold, I am Jesus Christ, the Son [CR, p. 61] of God. I am the same that came unto mine own, and mine own received me not. I am the light which shineth in darkness, and the darkness comprehendeth it not." (D&C 6:21.)
 

Comprehending the light

All three of the synoptic Gospel writers record the following classic illustration of the difficulty one in darkness has in comprehending the light. Matthew's version reads:

"When Jesus came into the coasts of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, saying, Whom do men say that I the Son of man am?

"And they said, Some say that thou art John the Baptist: some, Elias; and others, Jeremias, or one of the prophets." (Matt. 16: 13­14.)

Now, the people who expressed these opinions were Christ's contemporaries. Their conclusions evidenced the fact that they knew something about His mighty works. No doubt they were aware of His claim that He was the Son of God. Their minds, however, were opaque to the light of His true identity. Although the light was shining brightly about them, they "comprehended it not."

Having heard their answer as to who men said He was, Jesus directed to His disciples the question, "But whom say ye that I am?" (Matt. 16:15 [Matthew 16:15] .)

Then Peter, speaking for himself and presumptively for the others, answered, "Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God." (Matt. 16:16 [Matthew 16:16] .) In this declaration, Peter evidenced the fact that he and his fellow disciples did comprehend the light shining in the world of spiritual darkness around them.

In His response to Peter's answer, Jesus declared a truth understood only by those who comprehend the light by and through the gift and power of the Holy Ghost, for Jesus' answer was:

"Flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee," He said, "but my Father which is in heaven, . . . and upon this rock"--meaning, upon the rock of revelation, which comes by means of the Holy Ghost--"I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it." (Matt. 16:17­18 [Matthew 16:17­18] .)

How difficult it is to get one in darkness to comprehend the light or to believe that there is such light is illustrated by John's account of the interview between Jesus and Nicodemus.

"There was," says John, "a man of the Pharisees, named Nicodemus, a ruler of the Jews:

"[Who] came to Jesus by night, and said unto him, Rabbi, we know that thou art a teacher come from God: for no man can do these miracles that thou doest, except God be with him.

"Jesus answered and said . . . Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.

"Nicodemus saith unto him, How can a man be born when he is old? can he enter the second time into his mother's womb, and be born?

"Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God." (John 3:1­5; see also 3:6­10.)

One is born again by actually receiving and experiencing the light and power inherent in the gift of the Holy Ghost.
 

"More sure word of prophecy"

Now, concerning the third phase of our theme, "the more sure word of prophecy" (D&C 131:5), which is obtained by making one's "calling and election sure" (2 Pet. 1:10 [2 Peter 1:10]), the Prophet Joseph said:

"After a person has faith in Christ, repents of his sins, and is baptized for the remission of his sins and receives the Holy Ghost, (by the laying on of hands) . . . then let him continue to humble himself before God, hungering and thirsting after righteousness, and [CR, p. 62] living by every word of God, and the Lord will soon say unto him, Son, thou shalt be exalted. When the Lord has thoroughly proved him, and finds that the man is determined to serve Him at all hazards, then the man will find his calling and his election made sure, then it will be his privilege to receive the other Comforter, which the Lord hath promised the Saints, as is recorded in the testimony of St. John." (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p. 150.)

In the eighty-eighth section of the Doctrine and Covenants is recorded a revelation in which the Lord, addressing some of the early Saints in Ohio, said:

"I now send upon you another Comforter, even upon you my friends that it may abide in your hearts, even the Holy Spirit of promise; which other Comforter is the same that I promised unto my disciples, as is recorded in the testimony of John.

"This Comforter is the promise which I give unto you of eternal life, even the glory of the celestial kingdom." (D&C 88:3­4.)

I should think that all faithful Latter-day Saints "would want that more sure word of prophecy, that they were sealed in the heavens and had the promise of eternal life in the kingdom of God." (History of the Church of Jesus [Ensign, p. 45] Christ of Latter-day Saints, 5:388.)
 

Anchor to men's souls

As I read the sacred records, I find recorded experiences of men in all dispensations who have had this more sure anchor to their souls, this peace in their hearts.

Lehi's grandson Enos so hungered after righteousness that he cried unto the Lord until "there came a voice unto [him], saying: Enos, thy sins are forgiven thee, and thou shalt be blessed." (Enos 5 [Enos 1:5] .) Years later Enos revealed the nature of this promised blessing when he wrote:

"I soon go to the place of my rest, which is with my Redeemer; for I know that in him I shall rest. And I rejoice in the day when my mortal shall put on immortality, and shall stand before him; then shall I see his face with pleasure, and he will say unto me: Come unto me, ye blessed, there is a place prepared for you in the mansions of my Father." (Enos 27 .)

To Alma the Lord said, "Thou art my servant; and I covenant with thee that thou shalt have eternal life." (Mosiah 26:20.)

To His twelve Nephite disciples, the Master said:

"What is it that ye desire of me, after that I am gone to the Father?

"And they all spake, save it were three, saying: We desire that after we have lived unto the age of man, that our ministry, wherein thou hast called us, may have an end, that we may speedily come unto thee in thy kingdom.

"And he said unto them: Blessed are ye because ye desired this thing of me; therefore, after that ye are seventy and two years old ye shall come unto me in my kingdom; and with me ye shall find rest." (3 Ne. 28:1­3 [3 Nephi 28:1­3] .)

As Moroni labored in solitude abridging the Jaredite record, he received from the Lord this comforting assurance:

"Thou hast been faithful; wherefore, thy garments shall be made clean. And because thou hast seen thy weakness thou shalt be made strong, even unto the sitting down in the place which I have prepared in the mansions of my Father." (Eth. 12:37 [Ether 12:37] .)

Paul, in his second epistle to Timothy, wrote:

"I am now ready to be offered, and the time of my departure is at hand.

"I have fought a good fight, I have finished my course, I have kept the faith:

"Henceforth there is laid up for me a crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous judge, shall give me at that day." (2 Tim. 4:6­8 [2 Timothy 4:6­8] .)
 

Assurances in our day

In this dispensation many have received like assurances. In the spring of 1839, while the Prophet Joseph and his associates were languishing in Liberty Jail, Heber C. Kimball, our president's grandfather, labored against great odds caring for the Saints and striving to free the brethren who were in jail. On the sixth of April he wrote:

"My family having been gone about two months, during which time I heard nothing from them; our brethren being in prison; death and destruction following us everywhere we went; I felt very sorrowful and lonely. The following words came to mind, and the Spirit said unto me, 'write,' which I did by taking a piece of paper and writing on my knee as follows: . . .

"Verily I say unto my servant Heber, thou art my son, in whom I am well pleased; for thou art careful to hearken to my words, and not transgress my law, nor rebel against my servant Joseph Smith, for thou hast a respect to the words of mine anointed, even from the least to the greatest of them; therefore"--listen to this--"thy name is written in heaven, no more to be blotted out for ever." (Orson F. Whitney, Life of Heber C. Kimball, Bookcraft, 1975, p. 241; italics added.)

To the Prophet Joseph Smith the Lord said:

"I am the Lord thy God, and will be with thee even unto the end of the world, and through all eternity; for verily I seal upon you your exaltation, and prepare a throne for you in the kingdom of my Father, with Abraham your father." (D&C 132:49; italics added.)
 

Witness of truths

Now my beloved brethren, by way of summary and conclusion, I bear witness to the verity of these great truths. I know that the Spirit of Christ enlighteneth "every man that cometh into the world; and [that] the Spirit enlighteneth every man through the world, that hearkeneth to the voice of the Spirit." (D&C 84:46.)

I know that everyone who, following the whisperings of the Spirit, develops faith, is baptized, and receives the Holy Ghost through the laying on of hands by those having authority, may, by compliance with the teachings of the gospel, receive the gifts and the power of the Holy Ghost.

And I bear further witness that every such person who, having come this far, will follow the Prophet's admonition to "continue to humble himself before God, hungering and thirsting after righteousness, and living by every word of God" (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p. 150), may obtain the more sure word of prophecy.

That the Lord will bless all of us priesthood bearers that we will so understand these great truths, that in the end we shall, by making our calling and election sure, enjoy the full light of Christ, I humbly pray, in the name of Jesus Christ, our Redeemer. Amen.

Bruce mentioned a great talk by President Packer on the Light of Christ.

The Light of Christ: What Everyone Called to Preach the Gospel, 

Teach the Gospel, or Live the Gospel Should Know

President Boyd K. Packer
Acting President of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles
Ensign
, April 2005, pp. 8-14

From an address given on June 22, 2004, at a seminar for new mission presidents, 
Missionary Training Center, Provo, Utah. 

 

Most members of the Church have a basic understanding of the Holy Ghost. Most have experienced its promptings and understand why the Holy Ghost is called the Comforter. 

They know "the Holy Ghost . . . is a personage of Spirit" (D&C 130:22) and a member of the Godhead (see Articles of Faith 1:1). 

But many do not know that there is another Spirit - "the light of Christ" (D&C 88:7) - another source of inspiration, which each of us possesses in common with all other members of the human family. If we know about the Light of Christ, we will understand that there is something inside all of us, and we can appeal to that in our desire to share truth. 

The Holy Ghost and the Light of Christ are different from each other. While they are sometimes described in the scriptures with the same words, they are two different and distinct entities. It is important for you to know about both of them. 

The more we know about the Light of Christ, the more we will understand about life and the more we will have a deep love for all mankind. We will be better teachers and missionaries and parents, and better men and women and children. We will have deeper regard for our brothers and sisters in the Church and for those who do not believe and have not yet had conferred upon them the gift of the Holy Ghost. 

The Light of Christ is defined in the scriptures as "the Spirit [which] giveth light to every man that cometh into the world" (D&C 84:46; emphasis added); "the light which is in all things, which giveth life to all things, which is the law by which all things are governed" (D&C 88:13; see also John 1:4-9; D&C 84:45-47; 88:6; 93:9). 

And the Light of Christ is also described in the scriptures as "the Spirit of Jesus Christ" (D&C 84:45), "the Spirit of the Lord" (2 Corinthians 3:18; see also Mosiah 25:24), "the Spirit of truth" (D&C 93:26), "the light of truth" (D&C 88:6), "the Spirit of God" (D&C 46:17), and "the Holy Spirit" (D&C 45:57). Some of these terms are also used to refer to the Holy Ghost. 

The First Presidency has written, "There is a universally diffused essence which is the light and the life of the world, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world, which proceedeth forth from the presence of God throughout the immensity of space, the light and power of which God bestows in different degrees to 'them that ask him,' according to their faith and obedience."["Receiving the Holy Ghost," Improvement Era, Mar. 1916, 460. ]

Regardless of whether this inner light, this knowledge of right and wrong, is called the Light of Christ, moral sense, or conscience, it can direct us to moderate our actions - unless, that is, we subdue it or silence it. 

Every spirit child of our Heavenly Father enters into mortality to receive a physical body and to be tested. 

"The Lord said . . . they are the workmanship of mine own hands, and I gave unto them their knowledge, in the day I created them; and in the Garden of Eden, gave I unto man his agency" (Moses 7:32). 

"Wherefore, men are free according to the flesh; and all things are given them which are expedient unto man. And they are free to choose liberty and eternal life, through the great Mediator of all men, or to choose captivity and death, according to the captivity and power of the devil" (2 Nephi 2:27). 

Therefore, we know that "every man may act in doctrine and principle pertaining to futurity, according to the moral agency [the words free agency do not appear in the revelations] which I have given unto him, that every man may be accountable for his own sins in the day of judgment" (D&C 101:78; emphasis added). 

We are admonished to "quench not the Spirit" (1 Thessalonians 5:19). Thus we can see that "[all] are instructed sufficiently that they know good from evil" (2 Nephi 2:5; see also 2 Nephi 2:27). They have their agency, and they are accountable. 

This Spirit of Christ fosters everything that is good, every virtue (see Moroni 7:16). It stands in brilliant, indestructible opposition to anything that is coarse or ugly or profane or evil or wicked (see Moroni 7:17). 

Conscience affirms the reality of the Spirit of Christ in man. It affirms, as well, the reality of good and evil, of justice, mercy, honor, courage, faith, love, and virtue, as well as the necessary opposites - hatred, greed, brutality, jealousy (see 2 Nephi 2:11, 16). Such values, though physically intangible, respond to laws with cause-and-effect relationships as certain as any resulting from physical laws (see Galatians 6:7-9). The Spirit of Christ can be likened unto a "guardian angel" for every person.[See Joseph Fielding Smith, Doctrines of Salvation , comp. Bruce R. McConkie, 3 vols. (1954-56), 1:54. ] 

The Spirit of Christ can enlighten the inventor, the scientist, the painter, the sculptor, the composer, the performer, the architect, the author to produce great, even inspired things for the blessing and good of all mankind. 

This Spirit can prompt the farmer in his field and the fisherman on his boat. It can inspire the teacher in the classroom, the missionary in presenting his discussion. It can inspire the student who listens. And of enormous importance, it can inspire husband and wife, and father and mother.

This inner Light can warn and guard and guide. But it can be repulsed by anything that is ugly or unworthy or wicked or immoral or selfish.

The Light of Christ existed in you before you were born (see D&C 93:23, 29-30), and it will be with you every moment that you live and will not perish when the mortal part of you has turned to dust. It is ever there. 

Every man, woman, and child of every nation, creed, or color - everyone, no matter where they live or what they believe or what they do - has within them the imperishable Light of Christ. In this respect, all men are created equally. The Light of Christ in everyone is a testimony that God is no respecter of persons (see D&C 1:35). He treats everyone equally in that endowment with the Light of Christ. 

It is important for a teacher or a missionary or a parent to know that the Holy Ghost can work through the Light of Christ. A teacher of gospel truths is not planting something foreign or even new into an adult or a child. Rather, the missionary or teacher is making contact with the Spirit of Christ already there. The gospel will have a familiar "ring" to them. Then the teaching will come "to the convincing of [those who will listen] that Jesus is the Christ, the Eternal God, manifesting himself unto all nations" (Book of Mormon title page). 

During His mortal ministry, Jesus taught His gospel and put in place the foundation upon which His Church would be built. The foundation was built of stones of doctrine which can neither be seen with mortal eyes nor felt by touch; they are invisible and intangible. They will not weather away or crumble. They cannot be broken or dissolved or destroyed. These stones of doctrine are imperishable and indestructible. 

These stones of doctrine existed "before the world was" (D&C 124:38), "from before the foundation of the world" (D&C 124:41). Christ built His Church upon them. 

Jesus spoke of "the stone which the builders rejected" (Matthew 21:42). Then the shadow of apostasy settled over the earth. The line of priesthood authority was broken. But mankind was not left in total darkness or completely without revelation or inspiration. The idea that with the Crucifixion of Christ the heavens were closed and that they opened in the First Vision is not true. The Light of Christ would be everywhere present to attend the children of God; the Holy Ghost would visit seeking souls. The prayers of the righteous would not go unanswered. 

The conferring of the gift of the Holy Ghost must await the restoration of the priesthood and the dispensation of the fulness of times, when all things would be revealed. Temple work - ordinance work - would then be revealed. Then those who lived during the many generations when essential ordinances were unavailable, when baptism was not available, would be redeemed. God never abandons His children. He never has abandoned this earth. 

When the fulness of His gospel was restored, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints was built upon the same foundation stones of doctrine. 

Because we learn most everything through physical senses, teaching intangible doctrines which cannot be seen or felt becomes very difficult. Jesus, the Master Teacher, taught these doctrines, and they can be taught in the same way today. It is my purpose to show you how He, the Master Teacher, taught them. 

You can come to understand spiritual truths as clearly as if these stones of doctrine were as tangible as granite or flint or marble. Marble will yield to the hands of the sculptor so that others can see what he sees hidden within the shapeless stone. In like manner, you can teach others to see - that is, to understand - these intangible, invisible stones of doctrine. 

The way the Savior taught, and the way you can teach, is both simple and very profound. If you choose a tangible object as a symbol for a doctrine, you can teach just as He did. A teacher can associate the doctrine with an object already known, which can be seen with physical eyes. 

Jesus compared faith to a seed, the tiny mustard seed, which can be seen and touched. He told how if the seed is nurtured, it can grow and flourish and become a tree. (See Luke 13:19.) 

He compared the kingdom of heaven to an everyday object that can be seen. "The kingdom of heaven," He said, "is like unto a net, that was cast into the sea, and gathered of every kind" (Matthew 13:47); and He said, "The kingdom of heaven is like unto treasure hid in a field; the which when a man hath found, he hideth, and for joy thereof goeth and selleth all that he hath, and buyeth that field" (Matthew 13:44). 

Christ used as examples, as symbols, such ordinary things as salt (see Matthew 5:13; Mark 9:49-50; Luke 14:34) and candles (see Matthew 5:15; Mark 4:21; Luke 8:16; 11:33-36; Revelation 18:23), as rain (see Matthew 7:25-27) and rainbows (see Revelation 4:3; 10:1). The four Gospels are full of such examples. Likewise the Book of Mormon, the Doctrine and Covenants, and the Pearl of Great Price have dozens of similar references. They are everywhere. That is what a story or a parable is - a true-to-life example used to teach a principle or a doctrine that is invisible or intangible. 

One time in Matthew, one time in Luke, three times in the Book of Mormon, and three times in the Doctrine and Covenants, the Savior spoke of a hen with her chickens (see Matthew 23:37; Luke 13:34;3 Nephi 10:4-6; D&C 10:65; 29:2; 43:24). Everyone knows about hens and chickens, even little children. 

Now faith is not really exactly like a seed, nor is the kingdom of heaven exactly like a net or a treasure or leaven (see Luke 13:21) or "a merchant man, seeking goodly pearls" (Matthew 13:45). But with these illustrations, Jesus was able to open the eyes of His disciples - not their natural eyes but the eyes of their understanding (see Matthew 13:15; John 12:40; Acts 28:27; Ephesians 1:18; 2 Nephi 16:10; D&C 76:12, 19; 88:11; 110:1). 

With the eyes of our understanding, we see things that are spiritual. With our spirits reaching out, we can touch things that are spiritual and feel them. Then we can see and we can feel things that are invisible to the physical senses. Remember, Nephi told his rebellious brothers, who had rejected a message from an angel, "Ye were past feeling, that ye could not feel his words" (1 Nephi 17:45; emphasis added). 

Paul wrote to the Corinthians that "God hath revealed them unto us by his Spirit: for the Spirit searcheth all things, yea, the deep things of God. . . . 

"Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual. 

"But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned" (1 Corinthians 2:10, 13-14). 

In modern revelation, Christ spoke of "the light which shineth, which giveth you light [and] enlighteneth your eyes, which is the same light that quickeneth your understandings" (D&C 88:11). 

I do not know how to teach about the Spirit of Christ except to follow what the Lord did when He taught invisible, intangible truths to His disciples. 

To describe the Light of Christ, I will compare or liken it to the light of the sun. Sunlight is familiar to everyone; it is everywhere present and can be seen and can be felt. Life itself depends upon sunlight. 

The Light of Christ is like sunlight. It, too, is everywhere present and given to everyone equally. 

Just as darkness must vanish when the light of the sun appears, so is evil sent fleeing by the Light of Christ. 

There is no darkness in sunlight. Darkness is subject unto it. The sun can be hidden by clouds or by the rotation of the earth, but the clouds will disappear, and the earth will complete its turning. 

According to the plan, we are told that "it must needs be, that there is an opposition in all things" (2 Nephi 2:11). 

Mormon warned that "the devil . . . persuadeth no man to do good, no, not one; neither do his angels; neither do they who subject themselves unto him. 

"[Now] seeing that ye know the light by which ye may judge, which light is the light of Christ, see that ye do not judge wrongfully" (Moroni 7:17-18). 

This Light of Christ, which gives life, is within you. The evil one will attempt to obscure it. It can be so clouded with confusion so far as to convince you that it does not even exist.

Just as sunlight is a natural disinfectant, the Spirit of Christ can cleanse the spirit. 

Every soul, no matter who or where or when, is a child of God. Our responsibility is to teach that "there is a spirit in man: and the inspiration of the Almighty giveth them understanding" (Job 32:8). 

President Joseph Fielding Smith spoke of the teachings of the Holy Ghost and of the Spirit of Christ: "Every man can receive a manifestation of the Holy Ghost, even when he is out of the Church, if he is earnestly seeking for the light and for the truth. The Holy Ghost will come and give the man the testimony he is seeking, and then withdraw; and the man does not have a claim upon another visit or constant visits and manifestations from him. He may have the constant guidance of that other Spirit, the Spirit of Christ." [Doctrines of Salvation, 1:42; see also Joseph Smith, Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, sel. Joseph Fielding Smith (1976), 149. ] 

The Spirit of Christ is always there. It never leaves. It cannot leave. 

Everyone everywhere already has the Spirit of Christ, and while the Spirit of the Holy Ghost can visit anyone, the gift of the Holy Ghost is obtained "by obedience to the laws and ordinances of the Gospel" (Articles of Faith 1:3), by submitting to "baptism by immersion for the remission of sins; [and the] laying on of hands for the gift of the Holy Ghost" (Articles of Faith 1:4). It is not automatically present like the Spirit of Christ is present. This gift must be conferred by one holding authority (see Articles of Faith 1:5). 

That is what we are commissioned to do, to foster the Light of Christ, which is within every soul we meet, and bring souls to the point where the Holy Ghost may visit them. And then, in due time, they can receive, through the ordinance, the gift of the Holy Ghost, which is conferred upon every member of the Church. 

Once a person has received that gift of the Holy Ghost and can cultivate it together with the Light of Christ, which they already have, then the fulness of the gospel is open to their understanding. The Holy Ghost can even work through the Light of Christ. [See Doctrines of Salvation, 1:54. ] 

The Light of Christ is as universal as sunlight itself. Wherever there is human life, there is the Spirit of Christ. Every living soul is possessed of it. It is the sponsor of everything that is good. It is the inspirer of everything that will bless and benefit mankind. It nourishes goodness itself. 

Mormon taught: "Search diligently in the light of Christ that ye may know good from evil; and if ye will lay hold upon every good thing, and condemn it not, ye certainly will be a child of Christ" (Moroni 7:19). 

Everyone knows about sunlight. When you liken the Spirit of Christ to sunlight, ordinary examples from your own experiences may come to your mind. These examples are almost endless. These examples can be understood by little children or by adults, as the parables of Christ can be understood. It should not be difficult to teach how revelation can come through Light, even though we do not know exactly how inspiration works. 

Man himself, with all his limitations, can convey messages through fiber-optic cables. A single tiny fiber of glass, smaller than a human hair, can carry 40,000 messages at the same time. These can then be decoded and turned into sight and sound and color, even motion. Man can do that. 

A laser beam, where there is no wire or fiber at all, can carry 100 billion bits of information in a second. 

If man can do that, why should we marvel at the promise that the Light of Christ is in all of us and that the Holy Ghost can visit any of us? 

It should not be difficult, therefore, to understand how revelation from God to His children on earth can come to all mankind through both the Spirit of Christ and the Holy Ghost. 

This Light of Christ is everywhere in the scriptures. The Doctrine and Covenants is a very rich source of teaching on the Light of Christ. For example, it speaks of "the light of truth; which truth shineth. This is the light of Christ. . . . He is in the sun, and the light of the sun, and the power thereof by which it was made" (D&C 88:6-7). 

Ordinary teachers responsible to teach the doctrines and to testify of spiritual things have within their own personal experience everyday things which can be likened unto things which are spiritual. 

Then the Light of Christ can be ignited by the Spirit of the Holy Ghost, the Comforter. We are told that then "the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you" (John 14:26). 

President Harold B. Lee explained: "That light never entirely goes out . . . [speaking of the Light of Christ] unless we commit the unpardonable sin. Its glow may be so dim that we can hardly perceive it, but it is there for us to fan into a flame that shall burn brighter with understanding and with knowledge. Except for that, we wouldn't be able to achieve. Our missionary work would come to naught."[The Teachings of Harold B. Lee, ed. Clyde J. Williams (1996), 101.] If we understand the reality of the Light of Christ in everyone we see and in every meeting we attend and within ourselves, and understand the great challenge that we have - the surroundings in which we live, the danger which sometimes besets us - we will have courage and inspiration beyond that which we have known heretofore. And it must be so! And it will be so! All of this is a dimension of gospel truth that too few understand.

May you prayerfully and diligently endeavor to comprehend the meaning of these principles, and then begin to apply them. As you do, then follows the testimony that the gospel of Jesus Christ is true, that the Restoration of the gospel is a reality, and that The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is "the only true and living church upon the face of the whole earth" (D&C 1:30). Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, the Only Begotten of the Father. And from Him emanates the Light of Christ to all mankind.

May you who are called as missionaries or teachers and you who are parents "feast upon the words of Christ; for behold, the words of Christ will tell you all things what ye should do" (2 Nephi 32:3). In the name of Jesus Christ, amen.

(Moroni 10:17.)

17 And all these gifts come by the Spirit of Christ; and they come unto every man severally, according as he will.

The Light of Christ is power like faith is a power; it leads to spiritual life and away from spiritual death if it is used properly. (Agency)

The plan of salvation is given to us to teach us how to be a God.  And to be a God one must learn how to control this power perfectly.

(Ezekiel 12:14-16.)

 

14 And I will scatter toward every wind all that are about him to help him, and all his bands; and I will draw out the sword after them.

 

15 And they shall know that I am the LORD, when I shall scatter them among the nations, and disperse them in the countries.

 

16 But I will leave a few men of them from the sword, from the famine, and from the pestilence; that they may declare all their abominations among the heathen whither they come; and they shall know that I am the LORD.

 

Many did not come back to Jerusalem, just a few.  Complete scattering.

Symbolic Action as Prophecy in the Old Testament

 

Donald W. Parry

 

Donald W. Parry is visiting assistant professor of Hebrew at Brigham Young University.

 

Ancient Israelite religion featured groups and individuals who expressed themselves with symbolic actions. For example, Moses and Joshua removed their shoes while standing upon holy ground (Exodus 3:5; Joshua 5:15); Saul cut up two oxen and sent the pieces throughout Israel as a warning that individuals who failed to rally around the king would be similarly destroyed (1 Samuel 11:7); Solomon spread his hands toward heaven during the dedicatory prayer of the temple (1 Kings 8:22); Elijah divided the waters of the Jordan River by smiting them with his mantle (2 Kings 2:8); Elisha cast salt into a spring to heal its bitter waters (2 Kings 2:19-21); and Abraham took a heifer, a she-goat, and a ram and "divided them in the midst, and laid each piece one against another" (Gen. 15:10), after which he may have passed through the two parts (see Jeremiah 34:18). Several Old Testament prophets, including Abraham, Moses, Ahijah, Elijah, Isaiah, Jeremiah, and Ezekiel used such symbolic actions fn to prophesy, without words, of future events. Their unconventional action, gesture, movement, or posture of itself may not have had an immediate practical purpose but had symbolic meaning or metaphoric application. The future action was the typological fulfillment of the first, original action.

 

Although the symbolic actions of prophetic characters of the Old Testament occurred during various gospel dispensations, within different geographic locations, and under varying circumstances and contexts, there are commonalities among them. First, a prophet played a major role in the symbolic actions as prophecy. On one hand, it was common for the prophet himself to dramatize the prophecy, as was the case with Melchizedek breaking the bread and blessing the wine (JST Genesis 14:17), Moses casting the tree into the bitter waters (Exodus 15:22-25), or Jeremiah breaking the clay vessel (Jeremiah 19). On the other hand, the prophet gave directions to or witnessed a second party who enacted the prophecy, as was the case with Jeremiah, who watched a potter create two vessels (Jeremiah 18:1-12) and who caused several nations to drink from the wine cup of fury (Jeremiah 25:15-29).

 

Second, the prophetic symbolic action originated from God. In most cases, the scriptural record sets forth in a straightforward manner that the prophets received direct revelation from God. Such a revelation was formulated in the texts with one of two common formulaic expressions or revelatory speech forms—the messenger formula and the revelation formula. fn "Thus saith the Lord," "For thus saith the Lord God of Israel unto me," and "Thus saith the Lord God of Hosts" are variations of the messenger formula. The revelation formula features various expressions that indicate the prophet's reception of God's word, for example, "the word of the Lord came also unto me saying," "the Lord said unto the prophet . . . ," "God . . . said unto him," and so on. Generally recorded at the beginning of a new revelation, the formula introduces prophetic language; its primary purpose is to manifest the authority and origin of the revelation. Because the revelation originates with God and thus carries the authority of God through his prophet, the message (whether verbal or nonverbal) should therefore be accepted. Both the messenger and the revelation formulas "are indicative of prophetic authority and prerogative." fn The formulas demonstrate that the symbolic actions conducted by the prophets originate from Deity and did not stem from the imaginations of the prophets.

 

Third, prophetic symbolic actions include either a ritualistic gesture, a movement, a posture, or a dramatized act. For example, Joshua stretched a spear toward the city of Ai (Joshua 8:18-19); Ahijah tore a new garment into twelve pieces (1 Kings 11:29-31); Isaiah wrote the name Mahershalalhashbaz upon a scroll and then united with his wife (Isaiah 8:1-4); Jeremiah placed stones in a brick kiln (Jeremiah 43:8-13); and Ezekiel ate a scroll (Ezekiel 2:8-3:6).

 

Fourth, the dramatized action represents something other than what is visible to onlookers or participants. For example, the Lord instructed Ezekiel to perform a certain action, which in turn became a nonverbal prophecy. On one occasion God told Ezekiel to shave his beard and to cut the hair of his head with a razor and a knife and divide the cut hair into three parts. Next God commanded, "Thou shalt burn with fire a third part [of the hair] in . . . the city . . . and thou shalt take a third part, and smite about it with a knife: and a third part thou shalt scatter in the wind" (Ezekiel 5:2). The Lord interpreted these strange acts by drawing direct parallels between the three portions of Ezekiel's cut hair and the inhabitants of Jerusalem: "a third part of [the inhabitants of Jerusalem] shall die with the pestilence, and with famine shall they be consumed in the midst of thee; and a third part shall fall by the sword round about thee; and I will scatter a third part into all the winds" (Ezekiel 5:12). Ezekiel's symbolic prophetic actions were fulfilled when the Jews were scattered or destroyed—some were consumed by famine, others by the sword, and still others were scattered upon the face of the earth.

 

Other scriptural objects serve as symbols and representations: Jeremiah's yoke signified bondage (Jeremiah 27-28); Ezekiel's journey from home symbolized an exile of Israel (Ezekiel 12:1-16); Hosea and his wife represented Jehovah and unfaithful Israel respectively (Hosea 1; 3:1-5); Ezekiel's two sticks referred to the Bible and the Book of Mormon (Ezekiel 37:15-28); Jeremiah's book of evil represented the destruction that would come upon Babylon (Jeremiah 51:58-64); and the serpent of brass pointed to Jesus Christ and his atonement (Numbers 21:6-9). On occasion, the prophet himself served as the symbol. Such was the case with Ezekiel, of whom the Lord explained, "for I have set thee for a sign unto the house of Israel" (Ezekiel 12:6). Similarly, Isaiah stated that "I and the children whom the Lord hath given me are for signs and for wonders in Israel from the Lord of hosts" (Isaiah 8:18). Many times the prophet's explanation of the symbolic action is included alongside prophecy (see

1 Kings 11:29-31; Isaiah 20:1-6; Jeremiah 18:1-12; Ezekiel 4:9-17).

 

(Thy People Shall Be My People and Thy God My God: The 22d Annual Sidney B. Sperry Symposium [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1994], 84.) 
 
 
 
We had a very brief outline of chapters 13-15.  Bruce wanted to go deeper into 16 and 20.

The downfall of Judah is very similar to the downfall of Israel

Israel = Sodom, Judah = Gommorah

(Ezekiel 16:44-51.) – This is a graphic chapter of the wickedness of both kingdoms, not a pretty picture

 

44 ¶ Behold, every one that useth proverbs shall use this proverb against thee, saying, As is the mother, so is her daughter.

 

45 Thou art thy mother's daughter, that lotheth her husband and her children; and thou art the sister of thy sisters, which lothed their husbands and their children: your mother was an Hittite, and your father an Amorite.

 

46 And thine elder sister is Samaria, she and her daughters that dwell at thy left hand: and thy younger sister, that dwelleth at thy right hand, is Sodom and her daughters.

 

47 Yet hast thou not walked after their ways, nor done after their abominations: but, as if that were a very little thing, thou wast corrupted more than they in all thy ways.

 

48 As I live, saith the Lord GOD, Sodom thy sister hath not done, she nor her daughters, as thou hast done, thou and thy daughters.

 

49 Behold, this was the iniquity of thy sister Sodom, pride, fulness of bread, and abundance of idleness was in her and in her daughters, neither did she strengthen the hand of the poor and needy.

 

50 And they were haughty, and committed abomination before me: therefore I took them away as I saw good.

 

51 Neither hath Samaria committed half of thy sins; but thou hast multiplied thine abominations more than they, and hast justified thy sisters in all thine abominations which thou hast done.

 

If Israel was born of God she would worship God, yet these two kingdoms follow like harlots other gods (other men besides their husband), she must be born of heathen kingdoms since that is who they follow. 

Verse 46 – map direction oriented toward the rising sun, east and the setting sun, west.  They didn’t know about magnetic north.

East = Forward >>>> West = Behind >>>> North = Left hand >>>> South = Right hand

Verse 49 - Pride = Enmity against God, Fulness of bread, idleness, did not help the poor and the needy

Where much is given, much is required.

(Ezekiel 16:59-62.) – Breaking the covenant, yet there is always hope

 

59 For thus saith the Lord GOD; I will even deal with thee as thou hast done, which hast despised the oath in breaking the covenant.

 

60 ¶ Nevertheless I will remember my covenant with thee in the days of thy youth, and I will establish unto thee an everlasting covenant.

 

61 Then thou shalt remember thy ways, and be ashamed, when thou shalt receive thy sisters, thine elder and thy younger: and I will give them unto thee for daughters, but not by thy covenant.

 

62 And I will establish my covenant with thee; and thou shalt know that I am the LORD:

 

Ezekiel's Understanding of Dead Sea Symbolism

 

Ezekiel, a priest (Ezek. 1:3), would have been familiar with passages from the Pentateuch concerning the consequences of sin against Jehovah that befall lands and peoples. One such passage explained the curses that would fall upon the Israelites as a consequence for breaching their covenants with the Lord: "And the Lord will not spare him, but then the anger of the Lord and his jealousy shall smoke against that man, and all the curses that are written in this book shall lie upon him, and the Lord shall blot out his name from under heaven." (Deut. 29:20.) It is likely that Ezekiel perceived the fate of Sodom and Gomorrah as a type for rebellious Israel. Another passage that reflects the geographic cursing of Israel as a result of broken covenants is found in Deuteronomy: "And that the whole land thereof is [sulphur], and salt, and burning, that it is not sown, nor beareth, nor any grass groweth therein, like the [destruction] of Sodom, and Gomorrah." (Deut. 29:23.)

 

Ezekiel was familiar with the figurative usage of Sodom and Gomorrah as symbols of both wickedness and desolation. The Lord compares the wickedness of Jerusalem to that of Sodom: "As I live, saith the Lord God, [your sister Sodom] hath not done, she nor her daughters, as thou hast done, thou and thy daughters." (Ezek. 16:48.) The Lord consequently declares to Jerusalem that "I will even deal with thee as thou hast done, which hast despised the oath in breaking the covenant." (Ezek. 16:59.) Yet he promises, "I will remember my covenant with thee in the days of thy youth, and I will establish unto thee an everlasting covenant." (Ezek. 16:60.) Among these covenants was the promise that the land that lay desolate would once again become like the Garden of Eden. (Ezek. 36:34-35.)

 

Ezekiel's priestly background and his writings speak of his knowledge of the literal and figurative nature of this desolate region. He understood that when his people kept the Lord's commandments the land would become fertile and the people would prosper. Ezekiel's prophecy using the water motif signals the commencement of the Edenic day of restoration.

 

(Richard D. Draper, ed., A Witness of Jesus Christ: The 1989 Sperry Symposium on the Old Testament [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1990], 283.)

(Ezekiel 18:31-32.) – It’s all about Repentance, turn yourselves and live.

 

31 ¶ Cast away from you all your transgressions, whereby ye have transgressed; and make you a new heart and a new spirit: for why will ye die, O house of Israel?

 

32 For I have no pleasure in the death of him that dieth, saith the Lord GOD: wherefore turn yourselves, and live ye.

 

 

The tribes of Israel also have the promise that they shall again see their God in the days of redemption and gathering. "I will plead with you face to face. Like as I pleaded with your fathers in the wilderness of the land of Egypt, so will I plead with you, saith the Lord God. And I will cause you to pass under the rod, and I will bring you into the bond of the covenant. . . . And ye shall know that I am the Lord." (Ezek. 20:33-38.) To some extent this has already been fulfilled through the restoration of the gospel covenant and the appearance of the Lord to certain of his prophets. A yet more glorious fulfillment lies ahead and will be found when Israel's God appears personally to each worthy member of that chosen race.

 

 

(Bruce R. McConkie, The Promised Messiah: The First Coming of Christ [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1978], 610.)

 

 (Ezekiel 20:33-38.) – The sheep know the Shepards voice.

 

33 ¶ As I live, saith the Lord GOD, surely with a mighty hand, and with a stretched out arm, and with fury poured out, will I rule over you:

 

34 And I will bring you out from the people, and will gather you out of the countries wherein ye are scattered, with a mighty hand, and with a stretched out arm, and with fury poured out.

 

35 And I will bring you into the wilderness of the people, and there will I plead with you face to face.

 

36 Like as I pleaded with your fathers in the wilderness of the land of Egypt, so will I plead with you, saith the Lord GOD.

 

37 And I will cause you to pass under the rod, and I will bring you into the bond of the covenant:

 

38 And I will purge out from among you the rebels, and them that transgress against me: I will bring them forth out of the country where they sojourn, and they shall not enter into the land of Israel: and ye shall know that I am the LORD.

 

 

Ezekiel 33-37

December 7, 2006

We quickly skipped through the chapters about the destruction of Judah’s enemies. 

Chapter 24 – Ezekiel’s wife dies suddenly but he cannot mourn for her, it is a symbol of the destruction of Jerusalem.

God's Judgments on His Unfaithful People (Ezek. 22-24)

 

Ezekiel 22 contains three unrelated pronouncements against Jerusalem. The first pronouncement (vv. 1-16) accuses Jerusalem of bloodshed "in the midst" of it (cf. Ezek. 24:7) and of idolatry, besides a list of violations of Mosaic injunctions: dishonoring father and mother (cf. Ex. 21:17; Lev. 20:9); oppressing strangers, widows, and orphans (cf. Ex. 22:21-22; Deut. 14:29); desecration of Sabbaths (cf. Lev. 19:30); and a whole range of prohibited sexual practices (cf. Lev. 18:20). Because of these practices, Jerusalem and Judah would be disinherited and dispersed (Ezek. 22:15).

 

In the next pronouncement (Ezek. 22:17-22), the inhabitants of Jerusalem are likened to dross that will be heated until it is completely dissipated. Unlike other passages that also speak of a smelting process that purifies and purges the dross (Isa. 1:22, 25; Mal. 3:2-3), here Ezekiel speaks of the people as being nothing but dross. As a result, the heating process will leave nothing.

 

The final pronouncement is against those individuals and leaders in Jerusalem who should have acted to forfend judgment but failed to do so. The princes, who should have protected the rights of the citizens, have shed blood instead. The priests, whose responsibility was to preserve purity and promote the observance of the law, "have violated my law, and have profaned mine holy things: they have put no difference between the holy and profane, neither have they shewed difference between the unclean and the clean, and have hid their eyes from my sabbaths" (Ezek. 22:26). False prophets among the people "have devoured souls" (Ezek. 22:25) and "have daubed them with untempered mortar, seeing vanity, and divining lies unto them, saying, Thus saith the Lord God, when the Lord hath not spoken" (Ezek. 22:28). As a result, the Lord has executed judgment against them (see also Zeph. 3:3-4; Micah 3:11).

 

Again, in chapter 23, Ezekiel returned to the harlotry metaphor, already developed in such explicit detail in chapter 16. Here he presented the allegory of the two sisters, Aholah and Aholibah, who represent Samaria and Jerusalem (i.e., Israel and Judah), respectively (Ezek. 23:4). According to the allegory, although the two sisters had already "committed whoredoms in Egypt" (Ezek. 23:2), the Lord still took them in "marriage." Exactly what these "whoredoms" consisted of is not made clear, although it is likely that it refers to Israel's rebellion in the desert even before the covenant ("marriage") at Sinai—or Israel's state of apostasy in Egypt before the Exodus (cf. Ex. 14:10-18; 15:19-26; 16:1-26; 17:1-6). Thereafter, Aholah played the prostitute with Assyria, probably referring to the many treaties made between Samaria and Assyria before the fall of the Northern Kingdom (2 Kgs. 15:19-22; 17:1-6). As a result, said Ezekiel, God gave Samaria into the hand of her lovers. Aholibah, who should have learned from the sorry example of her sister, actually redoubled her crime: not only did she commit adultery with Assyria (a likely reference to Judah's alliances with Assyria; cf. 2 Kgs. 16:7-9; 18:1-36) but with Babylon as well (cf. 2 Kgs. 20:12-21). For these wrongdoings, Judah would suffer the same punishment as had Samaria: defeat, death, and exile.

 

Ezekiel began chapter 24 with the allegory of the pot. Here, God commanded Ezekiel to record the date—the ninth year, the tenth month, and the tenth day of the month (i.e, 10 January 588 B.C.)—whose significance becomes apparent in the following verse, for "the king of Babylon set himself against Jerusalem this same day" (Ezek. 24:2). In the allegory, someone was told to fill a pot with choice pieces of meat and bones and to place a fire under it to cook the contents of the pot. Two interpretations are then given. In the first, the pot, "whose scum is therein, and whose scum is not gone out of it" (Ezek. 24:6), is likened to Jerusalem "the bloody city . . . for her blood is in the midst of her" (Ezek. 24:6, 7), apparently referring to innocent blood that has been shed within her walls. In the second interpretation, Jerusalem is likened to the pot, which will be placed over a fire so violent that it will completely consume the impurities that are in the pot. This time, the Lord said, he will complete the process: "I will not go back, neither will I spare, neither will I repent; according to thy ways, and according to thy doings, shall they judge thee" (Ezek. 24:14). As the exiles in Babylon would soon learn from direct reports from Jerusalem, God had, through the Babylonians, begun the process of burning and purifying Jerusalem on the very day that Ezekiel had received this word.

 

In the second part of chapter 24, Ezekiel was told that his wife would die suddenly but that he was not to mourn her. When asked concerning this peculiar—and, in the light of the importance of mourning rites, highly inappropriate (cf. Jer. 16:1-7) fn—behavior, Ezekiel was to explain that it was a symbol for Jerusalem, whose inhabitants and temple would be so suddenly destroyed that there would be no time for mourning. The sudden death of his wife and his inability to mourn for her according to custom became a symbol of the sudden destruction of God's sanctuary in Jerusalem (Ezek. 24:15-18). The temple and the city would soon fall.

 

 

(Kent P. Jackson, ed., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 4: 1 Kings to Malachi [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1993], 283.)

Many armies tried to defeat the city of Tyre without success.  Alexander figured out a way to do it.

 The Destruction Of Tyre

by David Padfield

Tyre, the famous Phoenician seaport, is located 20 miles south of Sidon on the Mediterranean coast. During the conquest of the promised land by Joshua the Canaanites were not driven out of Tyre and other Phoenician cities as God commanded. "This city was justly entitled the 'Queen of the Sea,' that element bringing to it the tribute of all nations. She boasted of having first invented navigation and taught mankind the art of braving the winds and waves by the assistance of a frail bark. The happy situation of Tyre, at the upper end of the Mediterranean; the conveniency of its ports, which were both safe and capacious; and the character of its inhabitants, who were industrious, laborious, patient, and extremely courteous to strangers, invited thither merchants from all parts of the globe; so that it might be considered, not so much a city belonging to any particular nation, as the common city of all nations and the centre of their commerce." (Oliver Goldsmith, Alexander Reduces Tyre).

Hiram, king of Tyre, was instrumental in the building of the Temple in Jerusalem during the time of Solomon (1 Kings 5:1-18). The friendship between the Jews and Phoenicians ended when King Ahab married a daughter of King Ethbaal of Sidon. During the time of Joel, the Phoenicians sold Jewish children as slaves to the Greeks. The Lord promised retribution. "Indeed, what have you to do with Me, O Tyre and Sidon, and all the coasts of Philistia? Will you retaliate against Me? But if you retaliate against Me, swiftly and speedily I will return your retaliation upon your own head; because you have taken My silver and My gold, and have carried into your temples My prized possessions. Also the people of Judah and the people of Jerusalem you have sold to the Greeks, that you may remove them far from their borders." (Joel 3:4-6).

In Ezekiel 26, God makes a proclamation concerning Tyre, summed up in the following:

·                     Many nations would come against Tyre (Ezek. 26:3)

·                     The walls of Tyre would be broken down (Ezek. 26:4)

·                     Dust would be scraped from her, and she would be left like a bare rock (Ezek. 26:4)

·                     Tyre would be a place for the spreading of nets (Ezek. 26:5)

·                     Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, would build a siege wall around Tyre (Ezek. 26:8)

·                     Nebuchadnezzar would plunder the city (Ezek. 26:9-12)

·                     The stones, timber and soil of Tyre would be cast into the sea (Ezek. 26:12)

·                     The city would never be rebuilt (Ezek. 26:14)

After the destruction of Jerusalem and the carrying away of her king Zedekiah into captivity, "Nebuchadnezzar took all Palestine and Syria and the cities on the seacoast, including Tyre, which fell after a siege of 13 years (573 B.C.)" (E. A. Wallis Budge, Babylonian Life And History, p. 50). The inhabitants of Tyre fled to a rocky island half a mile offshore. The walls on the landward side of the island were 150 feet high. "The channel between Tyre and the mainland was over twenty feet deep, and frequently lashed by violent south-west winds. Their fortifications, they believed, would resist the strongest battering-ram yet devised. The city-walls stood sheer above the sea: how could any army without ships scale them? Shore based artillery was useless at such a range." (Peter Green, Alexander of Macedon, p. 248).

On his way towards Egypt, Alexander the Great (356-323 BC) led his Macedonian troops to victory at Sidon and then continued south towards Tyre. Tyrian envoys met with Alexander and assured him that their city was at his disposal. "However, he put their goodwill to the test by expressing his wish to sacrifice at the shrine of Heracles inside the city; for the Tyrians recognized a Phoenician god who was identified by the Greeks as Heracles, and from this deity Alexander claimed descent. Tyrian goodwill unfortunately did not extend so far as to grant him the permission he sought In short, they would not admit him into the city." (David Chandler, Alexander 334-323 B.C., p. 41).

Alexander was tempted to bypass the island fortress and continue his march towards Egypt. He sent messengers to Tyre, urging them to accept a peace treaty. Believing themselves to be safe on their island, the Tyrians killed Alexander's ambassadors and threw their bodies from the top of the walls into the sea. This act served only to anger Alexander and embitter his troops.

Alexander determined to build a mole to get his troops from the mainland to the island. The mole is said to have been at least 200 feet wide. It was constructed from stones and timber from the old city of Tyre on the mainland. In fulfillment of Ezekiel's prophecy, the very foundation stones, timbers and dust of the city was cast "in the midst of the water" (Ezek. 26:12).

For a while the Tyrians laughed at Alexander's project. At first they would row boats across the channel and harangue the Macedonians. Their laughter turned to concern when they saw the mole was going to be completed. The Tyrians ignited a barge and drove it into the first mole. The towers on the mole caught fire and several of Alexander's men lost their lives. Alexander gave orders for the work to continue, and that the mole itself should be widened and more protective towers be built.

Alexander was able to obtain ships from Sidon, Greek allies and Cyprus to form a blockade around Tyre. When the mole was within artillery range of Tyre, Alexander brought up stone throwers and light catapults, reinforced by archers and slingers, for a saturation barrage. Battle engineers constructed several naval battering rams which smashed through the walls of Tyre. Though courageous, the Tyrians were no match for Alexander's troops. Over 7,000 Tyrians died in the defense of their island. In contrast, only 400 Macedonians were killed.

The seven month siege, from January to July 332 B.C., was over. "The great city over which Hiram had once held sway was now utterly destroyed. Her king, Azimilik, and various other notables, including envoys from Carthage, had taken refuge in the temple of Melkart, and Alexander spared their lives. The remaining survivors, some 30,000 in number, he sold into slavery. Two thousand men of military age were crucified. Then Alexander went up into the temple, ripped the golden cords from the image of the god (now to be renamed, by decree, Apollo Philalexander), and made his long-delayed sacrifice: the most costly blood-offering even Melkart had ever received." (Green, p. 262).

One historian wrote, "Alexander did far more against Tyre than Shalmaneser or Nebuchadnezzar had done. Not content with crushing her, he took care that she never should revive; for he founded Alexandria as her substitute, and changed forever the track of the commerce of the world." (Edward Creasy, Fifteen Decisive Battles of the World, ch. 4).

The small southern Lebanese town of Tyre (Sur) now has a population of about 135,000. "Today, deep under asphalt streets and apartment blocks, the stone core of that fantastic causeway still stands: one of Alexander's most tangible and permanent legacies to posterity." (Green, p. 263). True to Ezekiel's prophecy, the mainland city of Tyre has never been rebuilt (Ezek. 26:14).

The inhabitants of Tyre did not believe the prophets of God as they spoke of the cities doom. Historian Charles Rollin observed: "To prove, in a sensible manner, to Tyre, that the prophecy concerning her ruin was not incredible, and that all the strength and wisdom of man could not ward off or suspend the punishment which God has prepared for the pride and the abuse of riches, Isaiah set before her the example of Babylon, whose destruction ought to have been an example to her. This city, in which Nimrod laid the foundation of his empire, was the most ancient, the most populous, and was embellished with more edifices, both public and private, than any other city. She was the capital of the first empire that ever existed, and was founded in order to command over the whole earth, which seemed to be inhabited only by families, which she had brought forth, and sent out as so many colonies, whose common parent she was. Nevertheless, says the prophet, she is no more, neither Babylon, nor her empire. The citizens of Babylon had multiplied their ramparts and citadels, to render even the besieging it impracticable. The inhabitants had raised pompous palaces, to make their names immortal; yet all these fortifications were but as so many dens, in the eyes of Providence, for wild beasts to dwell in; and these edifices were doomed to fall to dust, or to sink to humble cottages."

 
I WILL BE YOUR GOD (EZEKIEL 25-36)

 

KENT P. JACKSON

 

The second half of the book of Ezekiel begins with a collection of prophecies against foreign nations. Almost all of Judah's immediate neighbors are mentioned. fn As we have seen in other books, the prophets of Israel and Judah recorded scores of warnings and prophecies directed against other countries. Although Jehovah had selected the house of Israel as his people with whom he had a unique covenant relationship, still he was sovereign over all the earth, and all nations were subject to his will. Because all people are endowed at birth with the light of Christ that teaches them the difference between right and wrong, all will be held accountable to some degree and will receive the justice of Israel's God, even those who never knew him. fn

 

Prophecies against Ammon, Moab, Edom, Philistia, and Tyre (Ezek. 25-28)

 

As is frequently the case, God's complaint against the nations includes references to how they treated his covenant people (see Ezek. 28:24-26). Ammon (Ezek. 25:1-7) and Moab (Ezek. 25:8-11) were denounced for rejoicing over Judah's fall. fn Because of this, Ammon would be given over to the "men of the east." No longer would it be "remembered among the nations" (Ezek. 25:10), and its capital city, Rabbah (modern-day Amman, Jordan), would be destroyed and become "a stable for camels" (Ezek. 25:5). Moab would suffer a similar fate, and both nations "shall know that I am the Lord" (Ezek. 25:7, 11). fn

 

Edom (Ezek. 25:12-14) and Philistia (Ezek. 25:15-17) were condemned for taking revenge on Judah. "They shall know that I am the Lord," he said, "when I shall lay my vengeance upon them" (Ezek. 25:17; see Map 9, LDS Bible, for the locations of all these places).

 

Ezekiel 26 through 28 is dedicated to the condemnation of one of the chief cities of the ancient Near East. Tyre, whose name may mean something like "rock," or "fortress," was built on a small island one-half mile off the Phoenician coast (see Map 9, top). Its maritime location made it almost impregnable and guaranteed its role as the premier trading city in the eastern Mediterranean. In chapter 26, received in the eleventh year of Ezekiel's exile, or about 587 B.C., the prophet foretold that Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, would conquer Tyre: "With the hoofs of his horses shall he tread down all thy streets: he shall slay thy people by the sword, and thy strong garrisons shall go down to the ground. And they shall make a spoil of thy riches, and make a prey of thy merchandise: and they shall break down thy walls, and destroy thy pleasant houses: and they shall lay thy stones and thy timber and thy dust in the midst of the water" (Ezek. 26:11-12). So terrible would be the slaughter in Tyre that the other kings of the coast would sit on the ground and lament, "Now shall the isles tremble in the day of thy fall; yea, the isles that are in the sea shall be troubled at thy departure" (Ezek. 26:18).

 

Chapter 27 continues the prophecy. Verses 1 through 24 recounts her great prosperity as an economic power of the ancient world, who’s trading partners came from all over the Mediterranean and the Near East. From her profits she had become fabulously wealthy and, in her own estimation, "of perfect beauty" (Ezek. 27:3). But all this would end: "In the time when thou shalt be broken by the seas in the depths of the waters thy merchandise and all thy company in the midst of thee shall fall" (Ezek. 27:34). Her fall would be so dramatic that the merchants would ask, "What city is like Tyrus, like the destroyed in the midst of the sea? . . . The merchants among the people shall hiss at thee; thou shalt be a terror, and never shalt be any more" (Ezek. 27:32, 36).

 

In chapter 28 the king of Tyre is singled out for specific condemnation, though he probably represents here all that is presumptuous about his city. In the pride of his heart he proclaims, "I am a God, I sit in the seat of God, in the midst of the seas" (Ezek. 28:2). The Lord foretold that his fall would be commensurate with the loftiness of his self-image: "I will cast thee to the ground, I will lay thee before kings, that they may behold thee. . . . All they that know thee among the people shall be astonished at thee." And again, "Never shalt thou be any more" (Ezek. 28:17, 19).

 

Sidon, another Phoenician city, is also doomed (Ezek. 28:20-23). And, like the other nations condemned to destruction, her inhabitants "shall know that I am the Lord" (Ezek. 28:23).

 

Prophecies against Tyre and Egypt (Ezek. 29)

 

Ezekiel 29 through 32 contains a collection of prophecies of conquest and doom for Egypt, Judah's most prominent neighbor. Apparently because they share the same subject matter, these four chapters were placed together in one section of Ezekiel, though they were received over the course of several years.

 

Chapter 29 consists of two prophecies that announce Egypt's destruction at the hands of Nebuchadnezzar (vv. 1-16 and vv. 17-21). Like Tyre, Egypt is condemned for its arrogance; its king said, "My river [the Nile] is mine own, and I have made it for myself" (Ezek. 29:3, 9). But God would bring down Egypt's pride: "I will make the land of Egypt utterly waste and desolate," he declared (Ezek. 29:10). A recurring theme in the prophetic books is the Lord's insistence that his covenant people rely only on him for protection and not seek alliances with pagan nations. During the years of the Assyrian and Babylonian threats, Judah was often tempted to seek aid from Egypt, a temptation which the Lord consistently challenged his people to resist (e.g., Isa. 20:1-6; 30:1-3, 7; 31:1-3). They learned the hard way that Egypt could offer them no support: "They have been a staff of reed to the house of Israel. When they took hold of thee by thy hand, thou didst break, and rend all their shoulder: and when they leaned upon thee, thou brakest" (Ezek. 29:6-7; see also Isa. 36:6). Egypt "shall be no more the confidence of the house of Israel," the Lord foretold, but will be a reminder of Israel's sin in turning to her for help (Ezek. 29:16). The fall of Egypt would remove it from the ranks of the ancient superpowers, making it instead a "lowly" kingdom; "neither shall it exalt itself any more above the nations: for I will diminish them, that they shall no more rule over the nations" (Ezek. 29:15).

 

In some ways, the short prophecy in Ezekiel 29:17-21 is among the most interesting of the prophecies in the Bible. Although it foretells the fall of Egypt, its greatest revelation has to do with the prophecies in Ezekiel 26 through 28 that Tyre would be destroyed and plundered by Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon. Those prophecies were not fulfilled as announced.

 

Nebuchadnezzar apparently attempted for thirteen years fn (ca. 586-573 B.C.) to conquer Tyre but with less than satisfactory results. The offshore fortress city was extraordinarily difficult to take with the conventional means by which the Babylonians had prevailed elsewhere—siege warfare involving massive deployment of land troops and siege machinery. Historical sources are silent about how the long siege came to closure, but it must have ended in some kind of negotiated settlement. It appears that afterward a Babylonian governor was stationed in Tyre and presided alongside a new Tyrian king. fn In any case, Ezekiel 29:18-20 makes it clear that the plunder promised to the Babylonians by Ezekiel's prophecy was not forthcoming. Their efforts in that regard were in vain.

 

The prophecy in Ezekiel 29:17-21 is the last-dated passage in the entire book of Ezekiel and appears to be the last revelation Ezekiel recorded, coming in about 571 B.C. fn It concedes that Nebuchadnezzar failed to destroy and plunder Tyre as prophesied, but it points out that he and his warriors would not go away unrewarded. For their efforts the Lord would give them Egypt instead:

 

Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon drove his army in a hard campaign against Tyre; every head was rubbed bare and every shoulder made raw. Yet he and his army got no reward from the campaign he led against Tyre. Therefore this is what the Sovereign Lord says: I am going to give Egypt to Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon, and he will carry off its wealth. He will loot and plunder the land as pay for his army. I have given him Egypt as a reward for his efforts because he and his army did it for me, declares the Sovereign Lord" (Ezek. 29:18-20, NIV). fn

 

The graphic figure of heads "rubbed bare" and shoulders "made raw" is "derived from the burden-bearing laborer who works in bondage," fn and it represents the efforts expended by the Babylonians in their unsuccessful attempt to sack Tyre. Where Nebuchadnezzar failed at the task, a later conqueror succeeded. Alexander the Great, recognizing that extraordinary measures were needed to bring down Tyre, constructed a causeway two hundred feet wide from the mainland one-half mile to the island. This causeway enabled him to combine a sea attack with a land siege. Tyre fell after a seven-month effort in 333 B.C. (not a very long campaign by ancient standards). Alexander sold thirty thousand of its people into slavery, hanged two thousand of its leading citizens, and destroyed the city. Never again would Tyre proclaim, "I am a God, I sit in the seat of God, in the midst of the seas" (Ezek. 28:2). fn

 

Prophecies against Egypt (Ezek. 30-32)

 

Ezekiel 30 contains two prophecies of Egypt's doom (vv. 1-19 and 20-26). According to Ezekiel, Egypt's fate would be certain: "The sword shall come upon Egypt, and great pain shall be in Ethiopia, when the slain shall fall in Egypt, and they shall take away her multitude, and her foundations shall be broken down" (Ezek. 30:4). In this period the terms Egypt and Ethiopia (also called Cush) were frequently used synonymously in poetic parallelism (e.g., Isa. 20:3, 5; 43:3; Nahum 3:9). Once again, Nebuchadnezzar would be God's agent to bring about his justice against the wicked nation: "I will also make the multitude of Egypt to cease by the hand of Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon" (Ezek. 30:10).

 

In chapter 31 the prophet foretold the destruction of lofty Egypt by means of an allegory concerning the fall of the Assyrian empire. This revelation came in about 587 B.C., two decades after Assyria's demise. In the allegory Assyria is described as a tall tree, a cedar of Lebanon without parallel—"envied by all the trees of the Garden of Eden" (Ezek. 31:9). So imposing was it that all the great nations lived in its shade. Yet because of the great cedar's loftiness, "his heart is lifted up in his height" (Ezek. 31:10). Thus the Lord decreed that it would be chopped down.

 

In the allegory the tree is brought down by foreign powers: "strangers, the terrible of the nations" (Ezek. 31:12), who are not identified by name but clearly represent the forces of Persia and Babylonia, who combined to end Assyria's control of the Near East. They "cut him off, and have left him: upon the mountains and in all the valleys his branches are fallen, and his boughs are broken by all the rivers of the land; and all the people of the earth are gone down from his shadow, and have left him" (Ezek. 31:12).

 

But the message of this chapter is to Pharaoh and his country, not to the Assyrians, who had already met their fate. Just as Assyria had arrogated itself above God's creations, so now did Egypt. The outcome would be the same: "To whom art thou thus like in glory and in greatness among the trees of Eden?" the Lord asked Egypt. "Yet shalt thou be brought down. . . . This is Pharaoh and all his multitude, saith the Lord God" (Ezek. 31:18).

 

In about 585 B.C., Ezekiel received from the Lord instructions to take up a lament against the king of Egypt (Ezek. 32:1-16). The mocking poem that follows describes him as a sea monster pulled out of the water in a net and thrown onto the land. "The beasts of the whole earth" will gorge themselves on him (Ezek. 32:4), following which the Lord will scatter the remains of his carcass and blood all over the landscape. The interpretation of this metaphor is presented as follows: "The sword of the king of Babylon shall come upon thee. By the swords of the mighty will I cause thy multitude to fall, the terrible of the nations, all of them: and they shall spoil the pomp of Egypt, and all the multitude thereof shall be destroyed" (Ezek. 32:11-12).

 

In a revelation that apparently followed the previous one by two weeks (Ezek. 32:17-32), the Lord informed Ezekiel what would become of Pharaoh and his forces. He instructed the prophet to wail for Egypt and to cast its hosts down "unto the nether parts of the earth, with them that go down into the pit" (Ezek. 32:18). "Out of the midst of hell," the rulers of other fallen nations will mark Egypt's coming (Ezek. 32:21). Assyria is there, as are Elam, Meshech and Tubal, Edom, and Sidon and the "princes of the north"—all with their armies and their slain in graves (Ezek. 32:22-30). Perhaps because misery enjoys company, Pharaoh "shall see them, and shall be comforted," consoling himself in the idea that others shared his ignominious fate (Ezek. 32:31). fn

 

 

(Kent P. Jackson, ed., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 4: 1 Kings to Malachi [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1993], 286.) 

 

 

(Ezekiel 33:8-11.) – The wonderful definition of Repentance

 

8 When I say unto the wicked, O wicked man, thou shalt surely die; if thou dost not speak to warn the wicked from his way, that wicked man shall die in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at thine hand.

 

9 Nevertheless, if thou warn the wicked of his way to turn from it; if he do not turn from his way, he shall die in his iniquity; but thou hast delivered thy soul.

 

10 Therefore, O thou son of man, speak unto the house of Israel; Thus ye speak, saying, If our transgressions and our sins be upon us, and we pine away in them, how should we then live?

 

11 Say unto them, As I live, saith the Lord GOD, I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked; but that the wicked turn from his way and live: turn ye, turn ye from your evil ways; for why will ye die, O house of Israel?

 

 

 

The Meaning of Repentance

Elder Theodore M. Burton
Of the First Quorum of Seventy
Ensign, Aug. 1988, pp. 5-9

The most basic principles of the gospel are sometimes those least understood. And one of the most fundamental gospel principles is repentance.

Repentance is a mechanism for personal growth and development. So fundamental is the principle that the Lord stressed its importance seventy-one times in the Doctrine and Covenants. Two of those revelations, one following the other in the Doctrine and Covenants, are identical and conclude with these words:

"And now, behold, I say unto you, that the thing which will be of the most worth unto you will be to declare repentance unto this people, that you may bring souls unto me, that you may rest with them in the kingdom of my Father." (D&C 15:6; D&C 16:6; italics added.)

Why would the Lord give two identical revelations and have them published in the Doctrine and Covenants, one following the other? The Lord is a Master Teacher; he knows the value of repetition in learning. It may be that these revelations were intended not only for those to whom they were given, but also for all of us. If these revelations do indeed apply to you and to me, they help us understand that what is of greatest worth to each of us is to declare repentance to others and to practice it ourselves.

Just what is repentance? Actually, in some ways it is easier to understand what repentance is not than to understand what it is.

As a General Authority, I have prepared information for the First Presidency to use in considering applications to readmit repentant transgressors into the Church and to restore priesthood and temple blessings. Many times a bishop will write, "I feel he has suffered enough!" But suffering is not repentance. Suffering comes from lack of complete repentance. A stake president will write, "I feel he has been punished enough!" But punishment is not repentance. Punishment follows disobedience and precedes repentance. A husband will write, "My wife has confessed everything!" But confession is not repentance. Confession is an admission of guilt that occurs as repentance begins. A wife will write, "My husband is filled with remorse!" But remorse is not repentance. Remorse and sorrow continue because a person has not yet fully repented. Suffering, punishment, confession, remorse, and sorrow may sometimes accompany repentance, but they are not repentance. What, then, is repentance?

To find the answer to this question, we must go to the Old Testament. The Old Testament was originally written in Hebrew, and the word used in it to refer to the concept of repentance is shube. We can better understand what shube means by reading a passage from Ezekiel and inserting the word shube, along with its English translation. To the "watchmen" appointed to warn Israel, the Lord says:

"When I say unto the wicked, O wicked man, thou shalt surely die; if thou dost not speak to warn the wicked from his way, that wicked man shall die in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at thine hand.

"Nevertheless, if thou warn the wicked of his way to turn from [shube] it; if he do not turn from [shube] his way, he shall die in his iniquity; but thou hast delivered thy soul. …

"Say unto them, As I live, saith the Lord God, I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked; but that the wicked turn from [shube] his way and live." (Ezek. 33:8-11.)

I know of no kinder, sweeter passage in the Old Testament than those beautiful lines. In reading them, can you think of a kind, wise, gentle, loving Father in Heaven pleading with you to shube, or turn back to him--to leave unhappiness, sorrow, regret, and despair behind and turn back to your Father's family, where you can find happiness, joy, and acceptance among his other children?

That is the message of the Old Testament. Prophet after prophet writes of shube--that turning back to the Lord, where we can be received with joy and rejoicing. The Old Testament teaches time and again that we must turn from evil and do instead that which is noble and good. This means that we must not only change our ways, we must change our very thoughts, which control our actions.

The concept of shube is also found in the New Testament, which was written in Greek. The Greek writers used the [page 8] Greek word metaneoeo to refer to repentance. metaneoeo is a compound word. The first part, meta-, is used as a prefix in our English vocabulary. It refers to change. The second part of the word metaneoeo can be spelled various ways. The letter n, for instance, is sometimes transliterated as pn, and can mean air, the mind, thought, thinking, or spirit--depending on how it is used.

In the context in which meta- and -neoeo are used in the New Testament, the word metaneoeo means a change of mind, thought, or thinking so powerful that it changes one's very way of life. I think the Greek word metaneoeo is an excellent synonym for the Hebrew word shube. Both words mean thoroughly changing or turning from evil to God and righteousness.

Confusion came, however, when the New Testament was translated from Greek into Latin. Here an unfortunate choice was made in translation; the Greek word metaneoeo was translated into the Latin word poenitere. The Latin root poen in that word is the same root found in our English words punish, penance, penitent, and repentance. The beautiful meaning of the Hebrew and Greek words was thus changed in Latin to a meaning that involved hurting, punishing, whipping, cutting, mutilating, disfiguring, starving, or even torturing! It is no small wonder, then, that people have come to fear and dread the word repentance, which they understand to mean repeated or unending punishment.

The meaning of repentance is not that people be punished, but rather that they change their lives so that God can help them escape eternal punishment and enter into his rest with joy and rejoicing. If we have this understanding, our anxiety and fears will be relieved. Repentance will become a welcome and treasured word in our religious vocabulary.

We can learn more about the meaning of repentance from the thirty-third chapter of Ezekiel, where we read, "If the wicked restore the pledge, give again that he had robbed, walk in the statutes of life, without committing iniquity; he shall surely live, he shall not die." (Ezek. 33:15.)

Let us analyze these three steps of repentance. The first is commitment--to "restore the pledge." This is the most difficult step in the repentance process. What does "restoring the pledge" mean?

To restore or renew a pledge means to renew one's covenant with the Lord. We must forget all excuses and recognize fully, exactly, what we have done. We must not say, "If I hadn't been so angry," "If my parents had only been more strict," "If my bishop had only been more understanding," "If my teachers had only taught me better," "If it hadn't been so dark!" There are hundreds of such excuses--none of which matters much in the final analysis.

To truly repent, we must forget all such rationalizations. We must kneel down before God and openly and honestly admit that what we did was wrong. As we do so, we open our hearts to our Heavenly Father and commit ourselves completely to him.

To really commit oneself to God and to changing one's life--and to mean it--is the beginning of repentance. Our Savior's great commitment to his Father is exemplified best by his terrible trial in the Garden of Gethsemane, where he suffered in agony of spirit and shed great drops of blood.

Before this experience, he had always had ready communication with his Father. But now he was left alone to carry the burden of the world's sins. It was as if the heavens over his head were made of brass and he couldn't get through!

As he struggled in prayer and suffered horribly under the strain, he asked that the cup might pass and that some other path might be found. It is true that he added the words, "Thy will be done," but there was no answer to his request, and his soul continued to be filled with anguish.

Three times he pleaded for release, and all three times the answer was the same. (See Matt. 26:36-44.)

Yet Christ had fully committed himself to do what he had been appointed to do. He was willing, and he went forward! Though it cost him tremendous suffering, he had made up his mind and committed himself to be obedient in every particular, regardless of the cost.

Our struggles to repent may cost us agony of mind and body also, but our commitment to our Heavenly Father to do his will will make repentance possible and bearable for us. In our repentance, we should remember that the Lord does not punish us for our sins; he simply withholds his blessings. We punish ourselves. The scriptures tell us again and again that the wicked are punished by the wicked. A simple illustration can show how we do this.

Suppose my mother told me not to touch a hot stove because it would burn me. She would only be stating the law. Suppose I should forget or deliberately touch that hot stove. I would be burned. I could cry and complain of my hurt, but who would be responsible for the hurt I received? Not my mother. Certainly not the hot stove! I would be responsible. I would have punished myself.

This illustration, however, disregards the important element of mercy, which I will try to make clear in discussing a second step in the process of repentance--restitution, or to "give again that [which we have] robbed." (Ezek. 33:15.) If you have stolen money or goods, you can repay them--even sizable amounts, in time. But what if you have robbed yourself of virtue? Is there anything you can do, of yourself, to restore your virtue? Even if you gave your very life, you could not restore your virtue. But--perish the thought--does that then mean that it is useless to attempt restitution by performing significant good works or that your sin is unforgivable? No!

Jesus Christ has paid for your sin and has thus satisfied justice. Therefore, he will extend mercy to you--if you repent. True repentance on your part, [page 9] including a change in your life-style, enables Christ, in mercy, to forgive your sin.

The more serious the sin, the greater the effort it takes to repent. But if we work daily at turning completely to the Lord, we can stand blameless before the Savior. The key is to allow the Lord to complete the healing process without reopening the wound. Just as it takes time for a wound of the body to heal, so it takes time for a wound of the soul to heal.

If I cut myself, for example, the wound will gradually heal. But as it heals, it may begin to itch, and if I scratch it, it may open up again and take longer to heal. But there is a greater danger. If I scratch the wound, it may become infected from the bacteria on my fingers. I may poison the wound and lose that part of my body or even my life!

We must allow injuries to follow their prescribed healing course. If they are serious, we must see a doctor for skilled help. So it is with injuries to the soul. Allow the injury to follow its prescribed healing course without "scratching" it through vain regrets. If the transgression requires ecclesiastical confession, go to your bishop and get spiritual help. It may hurt as he disinfects the wound and sews it back together, but it will heal properly that way.

As you undergo the process of repentance, be patient. Be active with positive, righteous thoughts and deeds so that you can become happy and productive again.

As long as we dwell on sin or evil and refuse to forgive ourselves, we will be subject to return again to our sins. But if we turn from our problems and sins and put them behind us in both thought and action, we can concentrate on good and positive things. As we become fully engaged in good causes, sin will no longer be such a great temptation for us.

Now we come to a third step of repentance--forsaking sin, or striving to "walk in the statutes of life, without committing iniquity." (Ezek. 33:15.) We must forsake our sins, one by one. If we do this, the Lord has promised: "None [not even one] of his sins that he hath committed shall be mentioned unto him: he hath done that which is lawful and right; he shall surely live." (Ezek. 33:16.)

In our day, the Lord told the Prophet Joseph Smith, "Behold, he who has repented of his sins, the same is forgiven, and I, the Lord, remember them no more."

How do we know if a man or a woman has repented of his or her sins? The Lord answers that question in the next verse: "By this ye may know if a man repenteth of his sins--behold, he will confess them and forsake them." (D&C 58:42-43.)

Naturally, the confession that precedes repentance for serious sins should be made to a bishop or stake president who has the authority to hear such confession. Confessions to others--particularly confessions repeated in open meetings, unless the sin has been a public sin requiring public forgiveness--only demean both the confessor and the hearer. Repenting of serious sins takes time and effort. But whether the sin is small or great, the final step of repentance--forsaking sin--means that we do not repeat that transgression.

How grateful we should be for a kind, wise, loving Savior who will help us overcome our faults, our mistakes, and our sins. He loves and understands us and is sympathetic to the fact that we face temptations.

In the Book of Mormon, King Benjamin explains one way we can show our gratitude to the Lord for his great mercy and his sacrifice for our sins: "Behold, I tell you these things that ye may learn wisdom: that ye may learn that when ye are in the service of your fellow beings ye are only in the service of your God." (Mosiah 2:17.) God's work and glory is to redeem his children. If we participate in redemptive service to others, we can, in some small measure, repay him for his blessings.

God is merciful; he has provided a way for us to apply the principle of repentance in our lives and thus escape the bondage of pain, sorrow, suffering, and despair that comes from disobedience. After all is said and done, we are God's sons and daughters. And for those who understand its true meaning, repentance is a beautiful word and a marvelous refuge.

 
 
Zedekiah was places on the throne 597 BC, 12 years later, he was gone and Jerusalem was destroyed.

 

 (Ezekiel 33:21.)

 

21 ¶ And it came to pass in the twelfth year of our captivity, in the tenth month, in the fifth day of the month, that one that had escaped out of Jerusalem came unto me, saying, The city is smitten.

 

 

Ezekiel was right concerning his prophesies and the people now realized it.  From here on the prophesies are about the future and a restoration of the gospel, a return back to the Holy Land
 
The Watchman (Ezek. 33)

 

Chapter 33 repeats themes that were first introduced in Ezekiel 3:17-21 and 18:20-32. Ezekiel was called to be a "watchman" for his people, a metaphor that is explained clearly in 33:2-9. A watchman's responsibility was to warn his people of the coming of invading armies. If he fulfilled his responsibility and warned them, he would be guiltless if they fell to the sword. But if he failed to warn them, God would require their blood "at the watchman's hand" (Ezek. 33:6). The Lord told Ezekiel that his prophetic call carried the same weight of responsibility. If he warned the people with God's message and they refused to listen, he would be innocent of the consequences that they would bear. If, however, he failed to warn them as commanded, God would require their blood at Ezekiel's hand (Ezek. 33:7-8). Because of this responsibility that comes to those who are called to serve, Lehi's sons Jacob and Joseph magnified their callings, lest they "would not be found spotless at the last day" (Jacob 1:18-19). fn

 

The Lord cares much less about whom he should blame for our wrongdoings than that we overcome them and be blessed. "I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked," he said, "but that the wicked turn from his way and live: turn ye, turn ye from your evil ways; for why will ye die, O house of Israel?" (Ezek. 33:11). Powerful lessons in repentance and enduring to the end follow. One who abandons a life of evil and turns to good will be rewarded in accordance with his repentance and his final disposition to do right: "None of his sins that he hath committed shall be mentioned unto him" (Ezek. 33:16; see also vv. 14-15, 19). On the other hand, one who forsakes a life of faithfulness and becomes unrighteous cannot count on prior good acts to save him when he dies in his sins: "All his righteousnesses shall not be remembered" (Ezek. 33:13; see also vv. 12, 18).

 

The last section of chapter 33 (vv. 21-33) begins with the announcement that Jerusalem had fallen, an event that was accompanied by a huge slaughter and the deportation of most of the city's remaining population. Yet these catastrophes would not be the end of Judah's sorrows, Ezekiel announced. Those who remained in the ruins would "fall by the sword," those who had escaped to the countryside would be devoured by animals, and those still hiding would die of plague (Ezek. 33:27). Like the other nations chastened by God's hand, Judah too would "know that I am the Lord" (Ezek. 33:29). fn

 

Had the people not been warned? Had Ezekiel and other prophets not been watchmen to let them know that these disasters would come? Indeed they had been warned, but their rejection of God's prophets was one of the causes of their sorrows. As the Lord told Ezekiel, "they hear thy words, but they will not do them" (Ezek. 33:31). Because the watchman had raised his voice and the people had not obeyed, they would carry the full burden of their sins. Ezekiel had foretold the consequences of their behavior, and when they would be forced to the realization that his prophecies had come true—as they surely would—then they would know "that a prophet hath been among them" (Ezek. 33:33).

 

(Kent P. Jackson, ed., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 4: 1 Kings to Malachi [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1993], 292.)

Bruce said he isn’t as interested in the battle chapters as he is in the restoration chapters.

 

Read Ezekiel 34 before reading John 10, they are related.  Jesus had Ezekiel 34 in mind when he gave this declaration of the sheep and he as the Shepherd.  He tells those in John, Here I am, I am literally here, and I need to find my sheep! (3 Nephi 15)

 

 

(John 10:1-18.)

 

1 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that entereth not by the door into the sheepfold, but climbeth up some other way, the same is a thief and a robber.

 

2 But he that entereth in by the door is the shepherd of the sheep.

 

3 To him the porter openeth; and the sheep hear his voice: and he calleth his own sheep by name, and leadeth them out.

 

4 And when he putteth forth his own sheep, he goeth before them, and the sheep follow him: for they know his voice.

 

5 And a stranger will they not follow, but will flee from him: for they know not the voice of strangers.

 

6 This parable spake Jesus unto them: but they understood not what things they were which he spake unto them.

 

7 Then said Jesus unto them again, Verily, verily, I say unto you, I am the door of the sheep. – 1st I AM statement

 

8 All that ever came before me are thieves and robbers: but the sheep did not hear them.

 

9 I am the door: by me if any man enter in, he shall be saved, and shall go in and out, and find pasture.

 

10 The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly.

 

11 I am the good shepherd: the good shepherd giveth his life for the sheep. – 2nd I AM statement

 

12 But he that is an hireling, and not the shepherd, whose own the sheep are not, seeth the wolf coming, and leaveth the sheep, and fleeth: and the wolf catcheth them, and scattereth the sheep.

 

13 The hireling fleeth, because he is an hireling, and careth not for the sheep.

 

14 I am the good shepherd, and know my sheep, and am known of mine.

 

15 As the Father knoweth me, even so know I the Father: and I lay down my life for the sheep.

 

16 And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd.

 

17 Therefore doth my Father love me, because I lay down my life, that I might take it again.

 

18 No man taketh it from me, but I lay it down of myself. I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again. This commandment have I received of my Father.

 

The Good Shepherd

 

The scriptures indicate that the tendency to accept or reject Christ's voice in premortality carries over into this mortal life, for Christ has said that "whoso cometh not unto me is under the bondage of sin. And whoso receiveth not my voice is not acquainted with my voice, and is not of me." (D&C 84:51-52.) The only place we could have become acquainted with the voice of Christ, before we heard it in this mortal state, was in our premortal life. Referring to himself as the Good Shepherd, he said:

 

He that entereth in by the door is the shepherd of the sheep. To him the porter openeth; and the sheep hear his voice: and he calleth his own sheep by name, and leadeth them out. And when he putteth forth his own sheep, he goeth before them, and the sheep follow him: for they know his voice. And a stranger will they not follow, but will flee from him: for they know not the voice of strangers. . . .

 

I am the good shepherd, and know my sheep, and am known of mine. . . .

 

But ye believed not, because ye are not of my sheep, as I said unto you. My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me: And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand. My Father, which gave them me, is greater than all; and no man is able to pluck them out of my Father's hand. (John 10:2-5, 14, 26-29.)

 

This metaphor carries an even greater impression to the mind if one is acquainted with the relationship that existed between the shepherd and his sheep in ancient biblical times. One observer has noted:

 

By day and by night the shepherd is always with his sheep. . . . This was necessary on account of the exposed nature of the land, and the presence of danger from wild animals and robbers. One of the most familiar and beautiful sights of the East is that of the shepherd leading his sheep to the pasture. . . . He depends upon the sheep to follow, and they in turn expect him never to leave them. They run after him if he appears to be escaping from them, and are terrified when he is out of sight, or any stranger appears instead of him. He calls to them from time to time to let them know that he is at hand. The sheep listen and continue grazing, but if any one else tries to produce the same peculiar cries and gutteral sounds, they look around with a startled air and begin to scatter. . . .

 

As he is always with them, and so deeply interested in them, the shepherd comes to know his sheep very intimately. Many of them have pet names suggested either by the appearance or character of the particular sheep, or by some incident connected with it. . . . One day a missionary, meeting a shepherd on one of the wildest parts of the Lebanon, asked him various questions about his sheep, and among others if he counted them every night. On answering that he did not, he was asked how he knew if they were all there or not. His reply was, "Master, if you were to put a cloth over my eyes, and bring me any sheep and only let me put my hands on its face, I could tell in a moment if it was mine or not." Such is the fulness of meaning in the words of the good Shepherd, "I know mine own, and mine own know Me" (John 10:14). fn

 

 

(Kent P. Jackson and Robert L. Millet, eds., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 5: The Gospels [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1986], 329.)

 

 

(Ezekiel 34:1-19.) – The shepeards are not taking care of the sheep and they will be removed.

 

1 And the word of the LORD came unto me, saying,

 

2 Son of man, prophesy against the shepherds of Israel, prophesy, and say unto them, Thus saith the Lord GOD unto the shepherds; Woe be to the shepherds of Israel that do feed themselves! should not the shepherds feed the flocks?

 

3 Ye eat the fat, and ye clothe you with the wool, ye kill them that are fed: but ye feed not the flock.

 

4 The diseased have ye not strengthened, neither have ye healed that which was sick, neither have ye bound up that which was broken, neither have ye brought again that which was driven away, neither have ye sought that which was lost; but with force and with cruelty have ye ruled them.

 

5 And they were scattered, because there is no shepherd: and they became meat to all the beasts of the field, when they were scattered.

 

6 My sheep wandered through all the mountains, and upon every high hill: yea, my flock was scattered upon all the face of the earth, and none did search or seek after them.

 

7 ¶ Therefore, ye shepherds, hear the word of the LORD;

 

8 As I live, saith the Lord GOD, surely because my flock became a prey, and my flock became meat to every beast of the field, because there was no shepherd, neither did my shepherds search for my flock, but the shepherds fed themselves, and fed not my flock;

 

9 Therefore, O ye shepherds, hear the word of the LORD;

 

10 Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I am against the shepherds; and I will require my flock at their hand, and cause them to cease from feeding the flock; neither shall the shepherds feed themselves any more; for I will deliver my flock from their mouth, that they may not be meat for them.

 

11 ¶ For thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I, even I, will both search my sheep, and seek them out.

 

12 As a shepherd seeketh out his flock in the day that he is among his sheep that are scattered; so will I seek out my sheep, and will deliver them out of all places where they have been scattered in the cloudy and dark day.

 

13 And I will bring them out from the people, and gather them from the countries, and will bring them to their own land, and feed them upon the mountains of Israel by the rivers, and in all the inhabited places of the country.

 

14 I will feed them in a good pasture, and upon the high mountains of Israel shall their fold be: there shall they lie in a good fold, and in a fat pasture shall they feed upon the mountains of Israel.

 

15 I will feed my flock, and I will cause them to lie down, saith the Lord GOD.

 

16 I will seek that which was lost, and bring again that which was driven away, and will bind up that which was broken, and will strengthen that which was sick: but I will destroy the fat and the strong; I will feed them with judgment.

 

17 And as for you, O my flock, thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I judge between cattle and cattle, between the rams and the he goats.

 

18 Seemeth it a small thing unto you to have eaten up the good pasture, but ye must tread down with your feet the residue of your pastures? and to have drunk of the deep waters, but ye must foul the residue with your feet?

 

19 And as for my flock, they eat that which ye have trodden with your feet; and they drink that which ye have fouled with your feet.

 

 

 

The Good Shepherd and His Flock (Ezek. 34)

 

In Ezekiel the powerful metaphor of sheep and shepherds is developed only in chapter 34 (cf. Jer. 23:1; 31:10; 50:6, 17). The Lord condemns the shepherds of Israel for their gross neglect of the flock: "Should not the shepherds feed the flocks?" (Ezek. 34:2); "they were scattered, because there is no shepherd" (Ezek. 34:5); "yea, my flock was scattered upon all the face of the earth, and none did search or seek after them" (Ezek. 34:6).

 

Nowhere are the shepherds of Israel defined, but the meaning seems quite clear. Shepherds are leaders, those to whose care God's children have been entrusted. In ancient Israel the leaders included the prophets, the priests, and the kings. With callings of prophecy, priesthood, and royalty, these individuals had been charged with the responsibility of presiding in the house of Israel and providing leadership within their respective spheres. Unfortunately, the Bible shows evidence for all-too-frequent corruption in each of these areas: most of the kings were wicked, fn many priests defiled themselves, and false prophets were popular. A few passages, in fact, list these three as a triad of wickedness: "Her priests have violated my law. . . . Her princes in the midst thereof are like wolves. . . . And her prophets have daubed them with untempered morter, seeing vanity, and divining lies unto them" (Ezek. 22:26-28). "Her princes within her are roaring lions. . . . Her prophets are light and treacherous persons: her priests have polluted the sanctuary" (Zeph. 3:3-4). "The heads thereof judge for reward, and the priests thereof teach for hire, and the prophets thereof divine for money" (Micah 3:11).

 

These shepherds were not worthy of their callings, the Lord told Ezekiel, so God himself would become Israel's shepherd and gather his flock:

 

Behold, I, even I, will both search my sheep, and seek them out. As a shepherd seeketh out his flock in the day that he is among his sheep that are scattered; so will I seek out my sheep, and will deliver them out of all places where they have been scattered in the cloudy and dark day. And I will bring them out from the people, and gather them from the countries, and will bring them to their own land, and feed them upon the mountains of Israel by the rivers, and in all the inhabited places of the country. I will feed them in a good pasture, and upon the high mountains of Israel shall their fold be (Ezek. 34:11-14).

 

The message of the gathering of Israel is clear in this passage. The lost sheep of Israel will be brought back to the fold, gathered "out from the people" and "from the countries." They will be restored to the covenants of the gospel with Jehovah as their shepherd. He is their true prophet, priest, and king.

 

When Jesus proclaimed himself to be the "good shepherd" (John 10:11, 14), he was drawing upon the divine shepherd imagery familiar to the Jews from the Old Testament. Thus he was saying much more than "Follow me." Israel's Good Shepherd was Jehovah himself, as the Jews knew, and Jesus' pronouncement was a statement of that fact. In saying it, he was proclaiming that he is God: "I Am Jehovah." As he punctuated the announcement with the phrase, "I and my Father are one," the Jews "took up stones again to stone him" (John 10:30-31).

 

In Ezekiel 34:17, the prophet's metaphor takes a sudden and surprising turn. Though the shepherds will be condemned for their abuse or neglect of the flock, the sheep themselves are also accountable. They too will be judged, and the judgment against them will not be easy. Some of them ate the good pasture and trampled what was left. They drank the water and dirtied the rest with their feet, leaving those identified as the Lord's own flock to drink foul water. They pushed away the weaker among them and "scattered them abroad" (vv. 18-21). The Lord will intervene: "Therefore will I save my flock, and they shall no more be a prey" (v. 22).

 

The next passage is a powerful revelation about the Lord's millennial rule among his people: "I will set up one shepherd over them, and he shall feed them, even my servant David; he shall feed them, and he shall be their shepherd. And I the Lord will be their God, and my servant David a prince among them" (Ezek. 34:23-24). In another revelation the Lord said, "David my servant shall be king over them; and they all shall have one shepherd. . . . And my servant David shall be their prince for ever" (Ezek. 37:24, 25).

 

There is no mystery about the identity of the "David" mentioned here. These passages refer to Jesus Christ, who was a descendant of David in the flesh and who is and ever will be the true Shepherd and King of Israel. To the ancient Israelites, David embodied the very essence of kingship for several reasons: he was appointed by revelation from God, during his reign Israel and Judah were united as one nation under one king, he ruled as a powerful and popular monarch, he defeated all enemies and introduced a period of peace and prosperity, and the Lord's sanctuary was among the people in his day. fn These things came to mind whenever David's name was mentioned, and they provided for later Israelites not only the reminiscence of a past golden age but also the longing for a future age that would be even more glorious. Thus the name David took on symbolic significance and was applied to Israel's millennial King. He would be, as it were, a second King David, who would restore the glories of the past to which later generations of oppressed Israel looked with longing.

 

Who will be the second David, the millennial King of Israel? The scriptures are quite clear on this point: the Lord Jehovah, Jesus Christ, will be Israel's millennial king. "The Holy One of Israel," wrote Nephi, will "reign in dominion, and might, and power, and great glory" (1 Ne. 22:24). His name, Jeremiah foretold, would be "Jehovah, our Righteousness" (Jer. 23:5-6). "The king of Israel, even the Lord," reported Zephaniah concerning the Millennium, "is in the midst of thee" (Zeph. 3:15), and to Zechariah God said, "The Lord shall be king over all the earth: in that day shall there be one Lord, and his name one" (Zech. 14:9; see also vv. 16-17). The New Testament also identifies Israel's millennial king as Christ, who will rule at his Second Coming as "King of kings, and Lord of Lords" (Rev. 19:16). "For the Lord shall be in their midst," the Prophet Joseph Smith learned, "and his glory shall be upon them, and he will be their king and their lawgiver" (D&C 45:59). As the Prophet summarized, "Christ will reign personally upon the earth" when it is renewed in "paradisiacal glory" (A of F 10). fn

 

Who then is the "one shepherd," "even my servant David" in Ezekiel 34:23? Once again, it is the Lord Jesus Christ. "I am the good shepherd," the Lord proclaimed—a doctrine that is repeated in many passages (John 10:14; see also Heb. 13:20; 1 Pet. 5:4; Alma 5:38, 39, 41, 57, 60; D&C 50:44). Nephi learned from an angel that there is but "one Shepherd over all the earth" (1 Ne. 13:41), and many have testified that there will be "one fold and one shepherd" (1 Ne. 22:25; Hel. 15:13; 3 Ne. 15:17, 21; 16:3).

 

With Christ as Shepherd and King, the day of Israel's redemption will be a day of peace, safety, and well-being for the Lord's people. If the time of David's rule was a golden age, then the time of Christ's millennial rule will be one of transcendent happiness and order. The rain will fall in its season, the vegetation of the earth will yield its fruit, and hunger and shame will be things of the past (Ezek. 34:25-29). "I will make with them a covenant of peace," the Lord said (Ezek. 34:25); "thus shall they know that I the Lord their God am with them, and that they, even the house of Israel, are my people" (Ezek. 34:30).

 

 

(Kent P. Jackson, ed., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 4: 1 Kings to Malachi [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1993], 294.)

 

Jehovah is always following the instruction of Heavenly Father He speaks for Him 

 

David = Jesus Christ this is Millennial.  There isn’t a special person named David in verse 23.

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 109:55-67.)

 

55 Remember the kings, the princes, the nobles, and the great ones of the earth, and all people, and the churches, all the poor, the needy, and afflicted ones of the earth;

 

56 That their hearts may be softened when thy servants shall go out from thy house, O Jehovah, to bear testimony of thy name; that their prejudices may give way before the truth, and thy people may obtain favor in the sight of all;

 

57 That all the ends of the earth may know that we, thy servants, have heard thy voice, and that thou hast sent us;

 

58 That from among all these, thy servants, the sons of Jacob, may gather out the righteous to build a holy city to thy name, as thou hast commanded them.

 

59 We ask thee to appoint unto Zion other stakes besides this one which thou hast appointed, that the gathering of thy people may roll on in great power and majesty, that thy work may be cut short in righteousness.

 

60 Now these words, O Lord, we have spoken before thee, concerning the revelations and commandments which thou hast given unto us, who are identified with the Gentiles.

 

61 But thou knowest that thou hast a great love for the children of Jacob, who have been scattered upon the mountains for a long time, in a cloudy and dark day. – A day without light

 

62 We therefore ask thee to have mercy upon the children of Jacob, that Jerusalem, from this hour, may begin to be redeemed;

 

63 And the yoke of bondage may begin to be broken off from the house of David;

 

64 And the children of Judah may begin to return to the lands which thou didst give to Abraham, their father.

 

65 And cause that the remnants of Jacob, who have been cursed and smitten because of their transgression, be converted from their wild and savage condition to the fulness of the everlasting gospel; The 10 Tribes

 

66 That they may lay down their weapons of bloodshed, and cease their rebellions.

 

67 And may all the scattered remnants of Israel, who have been driven to the ends of the earth, come to a knowledge of the truth, believe in the Messiah, and be redeemed from oppression, and rejoice before thee.

 

One week later the keys Joseph prayed for came! (D&C 110)

 

Joseph is proclaimed the new Moses.  The old Moses comes to the new Moses and gives him the keys for the gathering.  Where do they gather?  At the temple where Elias gives the keys of eternal marriage, then Elijah comes to make the family of God complete, ready to return to the presence of Heavenly Father.

 

 

Babylon destroys Jerusalem; later Rome will do the same.  The leaders in Christ’s day know they are killing the Good Shepherd.

 

(Matthew 21:33-46.)

 

33 ¶ Hear another parable: There was a certain householder, which planted a vineyard, and hedged it round about, and digged a winepress in it, and built a tower, and let it out to husbandmen, and went into a far country:

 

34 And when the time of the fruit drew near, he sent his servants to the husbandmen, that they might receive the fruits of it.

 

35 And the husbandmen took his servants, and beat one, and killed another, and stoned another.

 

36 Again, he sent other servants more than the first: and they did unto them likewise.

 

37 But last of all he sent unto them his son, saying, They will reverence my son.

 

38 But when the husbandmen saw the son, they said among themselves, This is the heir; come, let us kill him, and let us seize on his inheritance.

 

39 And they caught him, and cast him out of the vineyard, and slew him.

 

40 When the lord therefore of the vineyard cometh, what will he do unto those husbandmen?

 

41 They say unto him, He will miserably destroy those wicked men, and will let out his vineyard unto other husbandmen, which shall render him the fruits in their seasons.

 

42 Jesus saith unto them, Did ye never read in the scriptures, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner: this is the Lord's doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes?

 

43 Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.

 

44 And whosoever shall fall on this stone shall be broken: but on whomsoever it shall fall, it will grind him to powder.

 

45 And when the chief priests and Pharisees had heard his parables, they perceived that he spake of them.

 

46 But when they sought to lay hands on him, they feared the multitude, because they took him for a prophet.

 

 

In the hardness of their hearts and the bitterness of their souls, we witness the abomination that would precede the desolation of both the temple and the nation of the Jews. Here within the very walls of the temple, where every ritual movement had been designed in the councils of heaven to testify of Christ, and every officiator to personify his likeness, those so chosen stood in open rebellion to him. To them he spoke in parables, that their "unrighteousness might be rewarded" to them. (JST, Matt. 21:34.)

 

Christ then related the "Parable of the Wicked Husbandmen," by which those corrupt priests, scribes, Pharisees, and elders pronounced their own judgment. (Matt. 21:33-44.) The parable concerns a householder who planted a vineyard, hedged it, dug a winepress in it, built a tower to protect it, placed it in the trust of husbandmen, and then left for a distant country. At the time of harvest he sent servants to receive the fruits of his vineyard, only to have them beaten or killed in one manner or another. Finally he sent "his son, saying, They will reverence my son. But when the husbandmen saw the son, they said among themselves, This is the heir; come, let us kill him, and let us seize on his inheritance." (Matt. 21:37-38.) Thus they killed the son.

 

Christ asked of his antagonists, "When the lord therefore of the vineyard cometh, what will he do unto those husbandmen?" To that they responded, "He will miserably destroy those wicked men, and will let out his vineyard unto other husbandmen, which shall render him the fruits in their seasons." (Matt. 21:40-41.) By their own mouths, and that too while acting in their official capacity, those corrupt "husbandmen" of Israel had passed judgment upon themselves. According to their own word, they were "wicked men" who ought to be "miserably destroy[ed]" and their stewardship properly given to others. For the third time in a row this contingent of scribes, elders, Pharisees, and chief priests (who but represented their counterparts throughout the nation) had become entangled in their own web and found themselves admitting their own guilt. Let it not be lost upon the reader that in this parable the wicked husbandmen, who had now been identified as the leaders of the Jews, recognized the heir of the Father and knowingly killed him!

 

At this point Jesus asked them if they had not read in the scriptures how it was prophesied that the stone rejected by the builders of the temple would yet be discovered to be the chief cornerstone. fn (Matt. 21:42; Ps. 118:22.) Again the meaning was clear: Jesus of Nazareth was announcing himself to be the Chief Cornerstone in his Father's house and was identifying the spiritually blind and hostile Jewish leaders as the builders who would reject him, along with their nation, until the time of his second coming.

 

Humiliated and angered, these devils cloaked in piety sought to lay hands on Christ but were prevented by his followers. (Matt. 21:46.) Away from their presence, Christ spoke plainly to his disciples, saying, "I am the stone, and those wicked ones reject me. I am the head of the corner. These Jews shall fall upon me, and shall be broken. And the kingdom of God shall be taken from them, and shall be given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof." (JST, Matt. 21:51-53.) Those upon whom the stone fell, he said, would be ground to powder. He extended his prophecy to the last days, when, he said, the vineyard of the Lord would be given to other husbandmen who would render its fruits to the Lord. (JST, Matt. 21:54-56.)

 

(Kent P. Jackson and Robert L. Millet, eds., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 5: The Gospels [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1986], 373.)

 

 

(Ezekiel 34:20-31.)

 

20 ¶ Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD unto them; Behold, I, even I, will judge between the fat cattle and between the lean cattle.

 

21 Because ye have thrust with side and with shoulder, and pushed all the diseased with your horns, till ye have scattered them abroad;

 

22 Therefore will I save my flock, and they shall no more be a prey; and I will judge between cattle and cattle.

 

23 And I will set up one shepherd over them, and he shall feed them, even my servant David; he shall feed them, and he shall be their shepherd.

 

24 And I the LORD will be their God, and my servant David a prince among them; I the LORD have spoken it.

 

25 And I will make with them a covenant of peace, and will cause the evil beasts to cease out of the land: and they shall dwell safely in the wilderness, and sleep in the woods.

 

26 And I will make them and the places round about my hill a blessing; and I will cause the shower to come down in his season; there shall be showers of blessing.

 

27 And the tree of the field shall yield her fruit, and the earth shall yield her increase, and they shall be safe in their land, and shall know that I am the LORD, when I have broken the bands of their yoke, and delivered them out of the hand of those that served themselves of them.

 

28 And they shall no more be a prey to the heathen, neither shall the beast of the land devour them; but they shall dwell safely, and none shall make them afraid.

 

29 And I will raise up for them a plant of renown, and they shall be no more consumed with hunger in the land, neither bear the shame of the heathen any more.

 

30 Thus shall they know that I the LORD their God am with them, and that they, even the house of Israel, are my people, saith the Lord GOD.

 

31 And ye my flock, the flock of my pasture, are men, and I am your God, saith the Lord GOD.

 

 

Chapter 35 – Esua and Jacob, the Edomites are Israels long-term enemies.  This chapter is really about the war against Satan and his hosts.  When Babylon destroyed Judah, the Edomites came in and took advantage of the situation.

 

A Prophecy against Edom (Ezek. 35)

 

Chapter 35 would seem to be more at home among the other oracles against foreign nations in chapters 25 through 32. No explanation regarding its placement here is given, nor is there a reference to the date of the revelation. It is a prophecy against Edom (KJV, "Idumea"), called in this chapter "Mount Seir." Like the other nations, God proclaimed, Edom would "know that I am the Lord" (Ezek. 35:4, 15) when his judgments would come upon it. Edom's offense was hostility against the kingdom of Judah—"a perpetual hatred"—which was manifest at the time of Judah's destruction. In response, the Lord would make Mount Seir "most desolate," a "perpetual desolation" (Ezek. 35:7,9). As in other places where individual nations represent the evils of all human-kind, Edom, especially, is used by the prophets to represent the world and its ways (D&C 1:36). Perhaps the placement of this revelation here, in the midst of two great prophecies of restoration (Ezek. 34-36) is meant to remind readers that the day of the Lord's redemption of his people will also be the day of his cleansing the world of all that is evil in it.

 

 

(Kent P. Jackson, ed., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 4: 1 Kings to Malachi [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1993], 297.)

 

 

The destruction by the Lord will be complete; it will be a rampage, a time of terror for the widked.  That time will be a time of great slaughter that is why the Lord will be dressed in red at the second coming.  It has nothing to do with Gethsamene.  Who fought Christ in the pre existence, that will finally be destroyed in the end?

 

(Isaiah 63:1-6.) – Isaiah sees what Ezekiel will see later

 

1 Who is this that cometh from Edom, with dyed garments from Bozrah? this that is glorious in his apparel, travelling in the greatness of his strength? I that speak in righteousness, mighty to save.

 

2 Wherefore art thou red in thine apparel, and thy garments like him that treadeth in the winefat?

 

3 I have trodden the winepress alone; and of the people there was none with me: for I will tread them in mine anger, and trample them in my fury; and their blood shall be sprinkled upon my garments, and I will stain all my raiment.

 

4 For the day of vengeance is in mine heart, and the year of my redeemed is come.

 

5 And I looked, and there was none to help; and I wondered that there was none to uphold: therefore mine own arm brought salvation unto me; and my fury, it upheld me.

 

6 And I will tread down the people in mine anger, and make them drunk in my fury, and I will bring down their strength to the earth.

 

Notes and Commentary

 

63:1 Edom/Bozrah. In Hebrew, the consonants of Edom are the same as those in the word translated as red; the consonants of Bozrah may be interpreted as one who takes part in processing grapes into wine. (As a rule, Hebrew is written without vowels.) This parallel of red apparel and wine making is made even plainer in 63:2, in which we have the repetition of red and winevat.

 

Edom is called Idumea, which the Lord equates with "the world" (D&C 1:36). In this sense, the Lord is coming from the world, referring, perhaps, to his atonement, in which he took upon himself the sins of the world, though he himself was without sin. Edom was also a land in the ancient Near East, of which Bozrah was the capital; both may symbolize worldliness. The Lord "descended below all things" (D&C 88:6) in performing the Atonement—we might say he went to the center and chief part of the world's wickedness. Having done so, he will return in fury to punish the unrepentant in the last days.

 

dyed garments. The Lord's garments are dyed red or stained a crimson color.

 

 63:2 red in thine apparel. When Christ returns, his garments will be red, as John saw: "And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood" (Rev. 19:13; D&C 133:48). The red clothing symbolizes at least three things: the blood Christ shed in performing the Atonement (Luke 22:44; D&C 19:18) the blood (or sins) of the wicked that he took upon himself (blood and sins are equated in Jacob 1:19; see also 1 Pet. 3:18; Alma 33:22; 3 Ne. 11:11) and the blood of the unrepentant wicked he has slain in his wrath (63:3; Lam. 1:15; D&C 133:48,  50-51). The blood symbolism is repeated here in the use of the words Edom, dyed garments, garments like him . . . in the winevat, winepress, blood . . . upon my garments, and stain all my raiment.

 

treadeth . . . winevat. The Jerusalem Bible reads, "Yahweh is represented as one who treads the grapes, his garments stained red. But what he has been treading are the nations, whose blood has spattered him, and who are represented by Edom. Some emend 'Edom' and 'Bozrah' and translate 'Who is this that comes all in red, in crimson garments like a wine-harvester?'"

 

63:3 have trodden the winepress alone. When Christ offered the Atonement in the Garden of Gethsemane, his agony was so great that "his sweat was as it were great drops of blood" (Luke 22:44), which presumably stained his garments. In addition, the blood of our sins—the signs of our wickedness—will stain his garments. This blood of atonement is symbolized by the image of a man who treads red grapes in a winepress, staining his clothing with the juice. But, with Christ, not only his hem but his whole garment will be stained. His whole being was engaged in the work of atonement. He trod the winepress alone because he alone could and did perform the Atonement, kneeling alone in the Garden of Gethsemane, hanging alone on the cross. "I . . . have trodden the winepress alone, even the winepress of the fierceness of the wrath of Almighty God" (D&C 76:107;  88:106).

 

will tread them in mine anger/trample them in my fury. Christ has trodden the winepress in offering the Atonement in the Garden of Gethsemane; but he will yet tread the nations in vengeance, even as in the winepress one treads on the grapes to force out the juice. Both acts stain his garments with blood (34:6; Joel 3:13; Lam. 1:15).

 

63:4 day of vengeance/year of my redeemed. The Lord is a God of both justice and mercy. Yet it appears that his blessings will continue far longer (year) than his punishments (day), at least in relation to this temporal earth (see commentary on 61:2). The "year of my redeemed" may refer to the jubilee year, when Israelite slaves were freed (Lev. 25:39-40; Ex. 21:2; Deut. 15:12). When the Lord comes, we will be freed from all the bonds of our enemies and oppressors.

 

63:5 there was none to help/mine own arm. Jehovah is the only one who can bring about the redemption of Israel. His arm brings vengeance to the wicked, salvation to the righteous. This verse closely parallels 59:16.

 

 63:6 make them drunk in my fury. He will cause them to drink the cup of his wrath (51:17), just as he himself earlier had to drink the bitter cup of atonement (3 Ne. 11:11; D&C 19:18).

 

bring down their strength. Other translations read, "poured their lifeblood on the ground." The day of vengeance is finished.

 

 

(Donald W. Parry, Jay A. Parry, and Tina M. Peterson, Understanding Isaiah [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1998], 559.)

 

The Old Testament holds the key to the other scriptures.  Once the wicked are destroyed then the restoration can take place.  This is why Ezekiel spends time to write about the wickedness of the neighborhood, especially chapter 35, this symbolizes Satan and his future destruction.

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 133:46-53.)

 

46 And it shall be said: Who is this that cometh down from God in heaven with dyed garments; yea, from the regions which are not known, clothed in his glorious apparel, traveling in the greatness of his strength?

 

47 And he shall say: I am he who spake in righteousness, mighty to save.

 

48 And the Lord shall be red in his apparel, and his garments like him that treadeth in the wine-vat.

 

49 And so great shall be the glory of his presence that the sun shall hide his face in shame, and the moon shall withhold its light, and the stars shall be hurled from their places.

 

50 And his voice shall be heard: I have trodden the wine-press alone, and have brought judgment upon all people; and none were with me;

 

51 And I have trampled them in my fury, and I did tread upon them in mine anger, and their blood have I sprinkled upon my garments, and stained all my raiment; for this was the day of vengeance which was in my heart.

 

52 And now the year of my redeemed is come; and they shall mention the loving kindness of their Lord, and all that he has bestowed upon them according to his goodness, and according to his loving kindness, forever and ever.

 

53 In all their afflictions he was afflicted. And the angel of his presence saved them; and in his love, and in his pity, he redeemed them, and bore them, and carried them all the days of old;

 

 

A New Heart and a New Spirit (Ezek. 36)

 

The first fifteen verses of Ezekiel 36 contain a prophecy addressed to the mountains, hills, ravines, valleys, and ruined cities of Israel, which had long suffered the scorn of the nations around them. This passage shows the fulfillment of the prophecy of destruction in Ezekiel 6:1-14, but it also announces that the Lord would restore what was lost: a new day would come in which the land's productivity and population would return. This would include the gathering of the house of Israel—"even all of it" (Ezek. 36:8-10). "Yea, I will cause men to walk upon you, even my people Israel; and they shall possess thee, and thou shalt be their inheritance" (Ezek. 36:12).

 

In the second revelation in chapter 36 (vv. 16-38), the Lord explained to Ezekiel why he had expelled the house of Israel from its promised land: "When the house of Israel dwelt in their own land, they defiled it by their own way and by their doings. . . . Wherefore I poured my fury upon them for the blood that they had shed upon the land, and for their idols wherewith they had polluted it: And I scattered them among the heathen [i.e., the nations fn, and they were dispersed through the countries" (Ezek. 36:17-19). Unfortunately, their scattering did not induce them to repent, and they continued to profane the Lord's holy name wherever they went in their dispersion (Ezek. 36:20-23). Despite that, however, the Lord would yet be glorified through the mighty work that he would bring to pass in the latter days. He would gather the dispersed of Israel back to him: "I will take you from among the heathen, and gather you out of all countries, and will bring you into your own land" (Ezek. 36:24). There they would be purified and come into harmony with the Lord's will, a process that is described in a series of metaphors that are clearly reminiscent of spiritual rebirth: "sprinkled clean," "new heart," "new spirit," "cleansed" (Ezek. 36:25-27, 33; cf. Alma 5:14, 19, 26).

 

To these promises the Lord added the crowning pronouncement: "Ye shall be my people, and I will be your God" (Ezek. 36:28). This phrase, in my view, is one of the most significant statements in the entire Old Testament. It is found frequently, and it always signifies that the covenant relationship between Jehovah and his people is intact. fn It shows the fulfillment of the Lord's intention as he established his covenant with the house of Israel: "I will take you to me for a people, and I will be to you a God" (Ex. 6:7). In times of apostasy the covenant relationship was nullified—"Ye are not my people, and I will not be your God" (Hosea 1:9)—but the prophetic promise foretold a day in which it would be established again, this time forever: "I will say to them which were not my people, Thou art my people; and they shall say, Thou art my God" (Hosea 2:23). fn

 

When the Lord takes back his repentant people and renews the covenant that bound them to him, he will also endow them richly with the blessings of the earth. The land will produce as never before, cities will be built, and desolate areas will be tilled (Ezek. 36:29-38). In that millennial setting, countryside that once lay waste and desolate will "become like the garden of Eden" (Ezek. 36:35), and, as Joseph Smith promised, "the earth will be renewed and receive its paradisiacal glory" (A of F 10).

 

Notes

 

Kent P. Jackson is professor of ancient scripture at Brigham Young University.

 

 

(Kent P. Jackson, ed., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 4: 1 Kings to Malachi [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1993], 298.)

 

 

(Ezekiel 36:23-28.) – Sanctified = Rededicated like the Sacrament, Israel needs to be spiritually reborn to be gathered

 

23 And I will sanctify my great name, which was profaned among the heathen, which ye have profaned in the midst of them; and the heathen shall know that I am the LORD, saith the Lord GOD, when I shall be sanctified in you before their eyes.

 

24 For I will take you from among the heathen, and gather you out of all countries, and will bring you into your own land.

 

25 ¶ Then will I sprinkle clean water upon you, and ye shall be clean: from all your filthiness, and from all your idols, will I cleanse you.

 

26 A new heart also will I give you, and a new spirit will I put within you: and I will take away the stony heart out of your flesh, and I will give you an heart of flesh.

 

27 And I will put my spirit within you, and cause you to walk in my statutes, and ye shall keep my judgments, and do them.

 

28 And ye shall dwell in the land that I gave to your fathers; and ye shall be my people, and I will be your God.

 

Spiritual rebirth is done by God; the key ordinance to spiritual rebirth is the gift of the Holy Ghost.  You have overcome spiritual death.  Moses 6:64-65!  Spiritually alive, you must maintain your rebirth because you can still spiritually die

 

There are two spiritual deaths according to the Book of Mormon.  The first spiritual death (Fall of Adam) will not be overcome in mortality; it is overcome at the resurrection.  We can overcome the second death here; the second spiritual death begins at the age of accountability. (Helaman 14)  It requires an active process (Moses 6:57-68) Spirtual birth is likened to the process of physical birth, a new life.

 

 

The Persistence of the Natural Man



___________________________________________

Though it is true that that natural man can be "put off" and men become "a saint" -- or a spiritual man (Mosiah 3:19) -- this does not mean that the natural man or the flesh is "dead".  We must be careful to recognize the persistence of the natural man.  Note the following statements:


Neal A. Mawell

  • Christ’s Atonement, of course, is for super sinners and the midrange sinners and then good people who make a lot of mistakes but are not wicked! Each of these acts of drawing upon the Atonement requires us to put off the natural man.  I am persuaded that so much of taking up the cross daily –- daily, not quarterly or semiannually –-  consists of putting off the natural man (see Mosiah 3:19). Doing this involves some arduous isometrics -–  the old man working against the new spiritual man. That natural man, as you know, will not go quietly or easily. And even when he is put off, he has a way of hanging around, hoping to throw his saddle on us once again. (The Holy Ghost: Glorifying Christ, Ensign, July 2002, p. 56)
  • As you pursue your discipleship and observe the human scene, do not be surprised or unnerved by the natural man’s relentless push for preeminence and power. (“The Pathway of Discipleship,” Ensign, Sept. 1998, p. 13) 
  • Nor does the natural man or the natural woman go away quietly or easily. Hence the most grinding form of calisthenics we will ever know involves the individual isometrics required to put off the natural man. Time and again, the new self is pitted against the stubborn old self. Sometimes, just when at last we think the job is done, the old self reminds us that he or she has not fully departed yet. (“Becoming a Disciple,” Ensign, June 1996, p. 15)

 

Brigham Young

  • As I have told you, your spirit is continually warring with the flesh; your spirit dictates one way, your flesh suggests another, and this brings on the combat. (Journal of Discourses, 3:212)
  • When we receive the Gospel, a warfare commences immediately; Paul says, "for I delight in the law of God, after the inward man," but I see another law in my members warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members." We have to fight continually, as it were, sword in hand to make the spirit master of the tabernacle, or the flesh subject to the law of the spirit. If this warfare is not diligently prosecuted, then the law of sin prevails, and in consequence of this some apostatize from the truth when crossing the plains, learn to swear instead of to pray, become high-minded and high tempered instead of learning to be patient and humble, and when they arrive in these vallies they feel so self-sufficient that they consider themselves the only ones that are really right; they are filled with darkness, the authority of the Spirit is not listened to, and the law of sin and death is the ruling power in their tabernacles. (Journal of Discourses, 9:287-288)


Spirits Contaminated Upon Birth

Elder Orson Pratt
Of the Quorum of the Twelve

“Spirits, though pure and innocent, before they entered the body, would become contaminated by entering a fallen tabernacle; not contaminated by their own sins, but by their connection with a body brought into the world by the fall, earthly, fallen, imperfect, and corrupt in its nature.  A spirit, having entered such a tabernacle, though it may commit no personal sin, is unfit to return again into the presence of a holy Being. . .”


(“The Pre-existence of Man,” The Seer, Vol. 1, No. 7, (July, 1853). Republished by Eugene Wagner, Salt Lake City, p. 98)

 
 
Awakening – A realization that we are in trouble

Childlike belief – In the Lord Jesus Christ

 

Correct doctrine – Knowing the way

 

Faith – Come to understand the will of God

 

Repentance – Adopting the will of God

 

Baptism – Covenant to keep the will of God

 

We have now covenanted to live the will of God.

 

Receive the challenge to receive the gift of the Holy Ghost, spiritual rebirth happens, (Moses 6:64-65) God gave him the new heart Adam is now spiritually alive.

 

 

 

Teachings Concerning
Spiritual Rebirth

The Necessity of Spiritual Rebirth

John 3:1-8

1 THERE was a man of the Pharisees, named Nicodemus, a ruler of the Jews:

2 The same came to Jesus by night, and said unto him, Rabbi, we know that thou art a teacher come from God: for no man can do these miracles that thou doest, except God be with him.

3 Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.

4 Nicodemus saith unto him, How can a man be born when he is old? can he enter the second time into his mother's womb, and be born?

5 Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.

6 That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.

7 Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again.

8 The wind bloweth where it listeth, and thou hearest the sound thereof, but canst not tell whence it cometh, and whither it goeth: so is every one that is born of the Spirit.

Moses 6:58-61

58 Therefore I give unto you a commandment, to teach these things freely unto your children, saying:

59 That by reason of transgression cometh the fall, which fall bringeth death, and inasmuch as ye were born into the world by water, and blood, and the spirit, which I have made, and so became of dust a living soul, even so ye must be born again into the kingdom of heaven, of water, and of the Spirit, and be cleansed by blood, even the blood of mine Only Begotten; that ye might be sanctified from all sin, and enjoy the words of eternal life in this world, and eternal life in the world to come, even immortal glory;

60 For by the water ye keep the commandment; by the Spirit ye are justified, and by the blood ye are sanctified;

61 Therefore it is given to abide in you; the record of heaven; the Comforter; the peaceable things of immortal glory; the truth of all things; that which quickeneth all things, which maketh alive all things; that which knoweth all things, and hath all power according to wisdom, mercy, truth, justice, and judgment.

Mosiah 27:25-26

25 And the Lord said unto me: Marvel not that all mankind, yea, men and women, all nations, kindreds, tongues and people, must be born again; yea, born of God, changed from their carnal and fallen state, to a state of righteousness, being redeemed of God, becoming his sons and daughters;

26 And thus they become new creatures; and unless they do this, they can in nowise inherit the kingdom of God.

Alma 7:14

14 Now I say unto you that ye must repent, and be born again; for the Spirit saith if ye are not born again ye cannot inherit the kingdom of heaven; therefore come and be baptized unto repentance, that ye may be washed from your sins, that ye may have faith on the Lamb of God, who taketh away the sins of the world, who is mighty to save and to cleanse from all unrighteousness.

Joseph Smith

But except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God. This eternal truth settles the question of all men's religion. A man may be saved, after the judgment, in the terrestrial kingdom, or in the telestial kingdom, but he can never see the celestial kingdom of God, without being born of water and the Spirit. He may receive a glory like unto the moon, [i.e., of which the light of the moon is typical], or a star, [i.e., of which the light of the stars is typical], but he can never come unto Mount Zion, and unto the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to an innumerable company of angels; to the general assembly and church of the Firstborn, which are written in heaven, and to God the judge of all, and to the spirits of just men made perfect, and to Jesus the Mediator of the new covenant, unless he becomes as a little child, and is taught by the Spirit of God. (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith     , p.12)
 

Bruce R. McConkie

Such is the plan of salvation for all men in all ages. Adam fell and brought death--both temporal death and spiritual death--into the world. The effects of his fall passed upon all men; all die temporally, and all are subject to spiritual death. Spiritual death is to die as pertaining to the things of the Spirit, as pertaining to things of righteousness. If men are to live again as pertaining to the things of righteousness, they must receive a spiritual rebirth. (The Mortal Messiah, 1:473)

 
 

What Is Spiritual Rebirth?

Moses 6:64-65

64 And it came to pass, when the Lord had spoken with Adam, our father, that Adam cried unto the Lord, and he was caught away by the Spirit of the Lord, and was carried down into the water, and was laid under the water, and was brought forth out of the water.

65 And thus he was baptized, and the Spirit of God descended upon him, and thus he was born of the Spirit, and became quickened in the inner man. [The word  quicken is defined in the Noah Webster's 1828 An American Dictionary of the English Language as "To become alive."]

Harold B. Lee

[Quotes Moses 6:65] Now there is a definition of what it means to be born again. It means to be quickened in the inner man. That's another way of saying it. (Stand Ye In Holy Places, p.54)

Mosiah 5:7

And now because of the covenant which ye have made ye shall be called the children of Christ, his sons, and his daughters; for behold, this day he hath spiritually begotten you; for ye say that your hearts are changed through faith on his name; therefore, ye are born of him and have become his sons and his daughters.

Harold B. Lee

[Quotes Mosiah 5:7] There's another explanation: when our hearts are changed through faith on his name, we are born again. (Stand Ye In Holy Places   , p.55)

Mosiah 27:25-29

25 And the Lord said unto me: Marvel not that all mankind, yea, men and women, all nations, kindreds, tongues and people, must be born again; yea, born of God, changed from their carnal and fallen state, to a state of righteousness, being redeemed of God, becoming his sons and daughters;

26 And thus they become new creatures; and unless they do this, they can in nowise inherit the kingdom of God

27 I say unto you, unless this be the case, they must be cast off; and this I know, because I was like to be cast off.

28 Nevertheless, after wandering through much tribulation, repenting nigh unto death, the Lord in mercy hath seen fit to snatch me out of an everlasting burning, and I am born of God.

29 My soul hath been redeemed from the gall of bitterness and bonds of iniquityI was in the darkest abyss; but now I behold the marvelous light of GodMy soul was racked with eternal torment; but I am snatched, and my soul is pained no more.

Alma 5:14

14 And now behold, I ask of you, my brethren of the church, have ye spiritually been born of God? Have ye received his image in your countenances? Have ye experienced this mighty change in your hearts?
 

Bruce R. McConkie

There is a natural birth, and there is a spiritual birth. The natural birth is to die as pertaining to premortal life, to leave the heavenly realms where all spirits dwell in the Divine Presence, and to begin a new life, a mortal life, a life here on earth. The natural birth creates a natural man, and the natural man is an enemy to God. In his fallen state he is carnal, sensual, and devilish by nature. Appetites and passions govern his life and he is alive -- acutely so -- to all that is evil and wicked in the world.

The spiritual birth comes after the natural birth. It is to die as pertaining to worldliness and carnality and to become a new creature by the power of the Spirit. It is to begin a new life, a life in which we bridle our passions and control our appetites, a life of righteousness, a spiritual life. Whereas we were in a deep abyss of darkness, now we are alive in Christ and bask in the shining rays of his everlasting light. Such is the new birth the second birth, the birth into the household of Christ. (A New Witness for the Articles of Faith, p.282)

 
 

Spiritual Rebirth Comes Through Ordinances

 

Joseph Smith

Being born again, comes by the Spirit of God through ordinances. (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p.162)
 

Marion G. Romney

One is born again by actually receiving and experiencing the light and power inherent in the gift of the Holy Ghost. ("The Light of Christ," Ensign, May 1977, p. 44.)
 

John 3:5

5 Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.
 

Harold B. Lee

The Master's admonition to Nicodemus, who came confessing Jesus as a teacher come of God, and undoubtedly seeking to know, like so many others who are true seekers after truth, just what he must do to be saved. He was told that he must be born again if he would see the kingdom of God. This statement, the Master clarified, when he explained, "Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God." (John 3:5.)

This new birth, then, was to be accomplished through the medium of baptism by immersion and by the laying on of hands for the conferring of the Holy Ghost, as the disciples, thereafter as they went out among the people, administered these sacred ordinances.   (Conference Report, April 1961, p.32)
 

Moses 6:64-65

64 And it came to pass, when the Lord had spoken with Adam, our father, that Adam cried unto the Lord, and he was caught away by the Spirit of the Lord, and was carried down into the water, and was laid under the water, and was brought forth out of the water.

65 And thus he was baptized, and the Spirit of God descended upon him, and thus he was born of the Spirit, and became quickened in the inner man.
 

Joseph Fielding Smith

  • We must receive the gift of the Holy Ghost; we must be born again; we must have sin and iniquity burned out of our souls as though by fire; we must gain a new creation by the power of the Holy Ghost. ("The Plan of Salvation," Ensign, Nov. 1971, p. 5)
  • This second death is not, then, the dissolution or annihilation of both spirit and body, but banishment from the presence of God and from partaking of the things of righteousness.In speaking of the transgression of Adam, the Lord has said: "Wherefore, I, the Lord God, caused that he should be cast out from the Garden of Eden, from my presence, because of his transgression, wherein he became spiritually dead, which is the first death, even that same death which is the last death, which is spiritual, which shall be pronounced upon the wicked when I shall say: Depart, ye cursed."  The second death is spiritual; it is banishment from the presence of the Lord. It is similar to the first spiritual death, which has passed upon all men who have remained unrepentant and who have not received the gospel. Those who have suffered the first spiritual death or departure, which is a shutting out from the presence of God, have the privilege of being redeemed from this death through obedience to the principles of the gospel. Through baptism and confirmation they are born again and thus come back into spiritual life, and through their continued obedience to the end, they shall be made partakers of the blessings of eternal life in the celestial kingdom of God. (Doctrines of Salvation, 2:222)


Mark E. Petersen

We receive confirmation by the laying on of hands and are given the gift of the Holy Ghost. But we must remember that in that ordinance we also receive a newness of life. If we are sincere, we are literally born again. In a very real sense we become different and better persons. We receive a new heart. We put away the man of sin, as Paul describes it, and take upon ourselves the name and the image of Christ (see Col. 3:9-10). ["The Image of a Church Leader," Ensign, Aug. 1980, p. 5]

  <>
Bruce R. McConkie

  • The first death, in point of time, was spiritual. Spiritual death is to die as pertaining to the things of the Spirit; it is to die as pertaining to the things of righteousness; it is to be cast out of the presence of the Lord, in which presence spirituality and righteousness abound. Adam died this death when he left Eden, and he remained dead until he was born again by the power of the Spirit following his baptism. (The Promised Messiah, p.224)
  • If a man "yields to the enticings of the Holy Spirit, and putteth off the natural man and becometh a saint through the atonement of Christ the Lord" (Mosiah 3:19), then he is born again. His spiritual death ceases. He becomes alive to the things of the Spirit; he returns to the presence of God because he receives the gift of the Holy Ghost; and he is alive to the things of righteousness. He crucifies the old man of sin, becomes a new creature of the Holy Ghost, and walks in a newness of life. This is what is meant by being born again. (The Promised Messiah, p.350)


 

Spiritual Rebirth Is Most Often Gradual Process

Bruce R. McConkie

  • Sometimes men are born again miraculously and suddenly, as was Alma. They become alive to the things of the Spirit and completely reverse the whole course of their life almost in an instant. But for most members of the Church the spiritual rebirth is a process that goes on gradually. (The Promised Messiah, p.351)
  • Except in miraculous and unusual circumstances, as with Alma (Mosiah 27), spiritual rebirth is a process. It does not occur instantaneously. It comes to pass by degrees. Repentant persons become alive to one spiritual reality after another, until they are wholly alive in Christ and are qualified to dwell in his presence forever. Similarly, conversion is a process and sanctification is a process. They increase in the hearts of the obedient in process of time as they more fully keep the commandments and seek the Lord.  Spiritual rebirth begins and ends with belief in Christ. When repentant souls turn to Christ and seek a new life with him, the processes of rebirth commence. When their belief in the Lord increases until they are able to do the works that he does, "and greater works than these" (John 14:12), their rebirth is perfect, and they are prepared for salvation with him. (Doctrinal New Testament Commentary, 3:402)


Merrill J. Bateman

For most of us, trying to be Christlike is a lifelong process and comes "line upon line, precept upon precept" (2 Ne. 28:30). Most of us, if faithful, are baptized "with fire and with the Holy Ghost, even as the Lamanites … were baptized … and they knew it not" (3 Ne. 9:20). In other words, spiritual rebirth is a gradual process for most individuals. At any point in time the changes are almost imperceptible; indeed, many of us worry that we are not becoming more Christlike even though we are. ("Living a Christ-Centered Life," Ensign, Jan. 1999, p. 7)

 
 

What Are the Signs of Spiritual Rebirth?

 

See "What Is Spiritual Rebirth?" Above

George Q. Cannon

We need to be born again, and have new hearts put in us. There is too much of the old leaven about us. We are not born again as we should be. Do you not believe that we ought to be born again? Do you not believe that we should become new creatures in Christ Jesus, under the influence of the Gospel? All will say, yes, who understand the Gospel. You must be born again. You must have new desires, new hearts, so to speak, in you. But what do we see? We see men following the ways of the world just as much as though they made no pretensions to being Latter-day Saints. Hundreds of people who are called Latter-day Saints you could not distinguish from the world. They have the same desires, the same feelings, the same aspirations, the same passions as the rest of the world. Is this how God wants us to be? No; He wants us to have new hearts, new desires. He wants us to be a changed people when we embrace His Gospel, and to be animated by entirely new motives, and have a faith that will lay hold of the promises of God. (Conference Report, October 1899, p.50)

Harold B. Lee

To become converted, according to the scriptures, meant having a change of heart and the moral character of a person turned from the controlled power of sin into a righteous life. It meant to "wait patiently on the Lord" until one's prayers can be answered. . . .

Conversion must mean more than just being a "card carrying" member of the Church with a tithing receipt, a membership card, a temple recommend, etc. It means to overcome the tendencies to criticize and to strive continually to improve inward weaknesses and not merely the outward appearances. (Conference Report, 1971April, p. 92)

Marion G. Romney

  • While conversion may be accomplished in stages, one is not really converted in the full sense of the term unless and until he is at heart a new person. Born again is the scriptural term. In one who is wholly converted, desire for things inimical to the gospel of Jesus Christ has actually died, and substituted therefore is a love of God with a fixed and controlling determination to keep his commandments. (Look to God and Live, p. 109)
  • The experience of each individual who is really born again is similar to this experience of Alma and the sons of Mosiah, although it may not be so dramatic. The effect upon each person's life is likewise similar. No person whose soul is illuminated by the burning Spirit of God can in this world of sin and dense darkness remain passive. He is driven by an irresistible urge to fit himself to be an active agent of God in furthering righteousness and in freeing the lives and minds of men from the bondage of sin. (Conference Report, October 1941, p.89)
  • Now since eternal life is the greatest of all the gifts of God, and obtaining it is conditioned upon being converted and healed, it is vital that we who are seeking eternal life understand what it means to be converted and healed. Converted means to turn from one belief or course of action to another. Conversion is a spiritual and moral change. Converted implies not merely mental acceptance of Jesus and his teachings but also a motivating faith in him and his gospel. A faith which works a transformation, an actual change in one's understanding of life's meaning and in his allegiance to God in interest, in thought, and in conduct. In one who is really wholly converted, desire for things contrary to the gospel of Jesus Christ has actually died. And substituted therefore is a love of God, with a fixed and controlling determination to keep his commandments.

Paul said that such an one would walk in newness of life. (See Romans 6:4.) Peter taught that by walking in this newness of life and developing within himself faith, virtue, knowledge, temperance, patience, godliness, brotherly kindness, and charity, one becomes a partaker of the divine nature. (See 2 Pet.1:4-7.) That is to say, he becomes like God. [Area Conference Report (Munich)1977:8]
 

Dallin H. Oaks

How can we measure our progress? The scriptures suggest various ways. I will mention only two.

After King Benjamin's great sermon, many of his hearers cried out that the Spirit of the Lord "has wrought a mighty change in us, or in our hearts, that we have no more disposition to do evil, but to do good continually" (Mosiah 5:2). If we are losing our desire to do evil, we are progressing toward our heavenly goal.

The Apostle Paul said that persons who have received the Spirit of God "have the mind of Christ" (1 Cor. 2:16). I understand this to mean that persons who are proceeding toward the needed conversion are beginning to see things as our Heavenly Father and His Son, Jesus Christ, see them. They are hearing His voice instead of the voice of the world, and they are doing things in His way instead of by the ways of the world. ("The Challenge to Become," Ensign, Nov. 2000, pp. 32-34)

 

J. Richard Clarke

From the pages of our missionary journal comes an event repeated often throughout the missions of the Church. John and Shirley Withers were successful advertising executives. They were on the fast track, indulging themselves in worldly pleasures. When contacted by our missionaries, they were impressed by their clean, sparkling countenances so unlike other young men they had known.

Previous behavior became incompatible with gospel principles. A [page 10] new set of priorities and values replaced worldly interests. Alcohol and tobacco habits became expendable, although with great effort. Modesty became the dress standard. Prayer, scripture study, Relief Society and priesthood service became the focus. They were baptized and received the Holy Ghost.

As Sister Clarke and I, with some of our missionaries, assembled in the Salt Lake Temple, John and Shirley Withers, with their children, were sealed together as an eternal family. Their countenances reflected the resplendent beauty of the emancipation of the soul. We witnessed a spiritual rebirth as if from the grave. ( "The Lord of Life," Ensign, May 1993, 9)

 
 

Dramatic Spiritual Manifestations
Not Necessary in Spiritual Rebirth

Harold B. Lee

The question, then, that sometimes we wrestle with is: Must there always be a visible, spiritual manifestation before one might be said to be born of the Spirit? We have some very dramatic incidents in which this is illustrated including the Apostle Paul's theophany, when he heard and he saw, in his conversion. And perhaps that experience is only matched by the great conversion of younger Alma. Alma, in reciting his experience, says:

"For, said he, I have repented of my sins, and have been redeemed of the Lord; behold I am born of the Spirit.

"And the Lord said unto me: Marvel not that all mankind, yea, men and women, all nations, kindreds, tongues and people, must be born again; yea, born of God, changed from their carnal and fallen state, to a state of righteousness, being redeemed of God, becoming his sons and daughters;"

Then he describes a little more intimately his experience:

". . . I ask you, my brethren of the church, have ye spiritually been born of God? Have ye received his image in your countenances? Have ye experienced this mighty change in your hearts?

"I say unto you, ye will know at that day that ye cannot be saved, for there can no man be saved except his garments are washed white; yea, his garments must be purified until they are cleansed from all stain, through the blood of him of whom it has been spoken by our fathers, who should come to redeem his people from their sins." (Alma 5:14, 21.)

And then, again, he summarizes and ecstatically tells us about how he felt:

"And oh, what joy, and what marvelous light I did behold; yea, my soul was filed with joy as exceeding as was my pain!

"Yea, I say unto you, my son, that there could be nothing so exquisite and so bitter as were my pains. Yea, and again I say unto you, my son, that on the other hand, there can be nothing so exquisite and sweet as was my Joy.

"Yea, methought I saw, even as our father Lehi saw, God sitting upon his throne, surrounded with numberless concourses of angels, in the attitude of singing and praising their God; yea, and my soul did long to be there.

"But behold, my limbs did receive their strength again, and I stood upon my feet, and did manifest unto the people that I had been born of God.

"Yea, and now from that time even until now I have labored without ceasing, that I might bring souls unto repentance; that I might bring them to taste of the exceeding joy of which I did taste; that they might also be born of God and be filled with the Holy Ghost." (Alma 36:20-24.)

 

There are some of us who think that that same kind of experience has to be experienced by everybody, or he can't be saved. I once ran into a very serious situation where one of our teachers had inflamed some women, in a class he was teaching, until they almost had the kind of feeling that they had to have some kind of demonstration or else they hadn't been born of the Spirit.

Another story that some people who support that idea recite is the conversion of Lorenzo Snow. President Snow had been a young college student; when he finally had an intellectual conviction of the truth, he sought for a deep-seated testimony, which he had not had at his baptism. And so, he reported, he went out one night to pray. This is how he describes the experience:

"It was a complete baptism, a tangible immersion in the heavenly principle or element, the Holy Ghost, and even more real and physical in its effect upon my system, than the immersion of water. Dispelling forever, as long as reason and memory last, all possibility of doubt and fear in relation to the fact handed down to us historically, that the babe of Bethlehem is truly the Son of God; also communicating knowledge, the same as in apostolic times."

Now, I repeat, because of some of these dramatic experiences, some of our teachers jump to the conclusion that one isn't born of the Spirit until he has had some such dramatic experience. (Stand Ye In Holy Places, p.59-60)

 

Bruce R. McConkie

Though there may be miraculous manifestations attending specific instances of spiritual rebirth, such are in addition to the actual fact of being "born of the Spirit." When the Holy Ghost falls upon a worthy recipient, it has the effect of pouring out pure intelligence upon him; all is calm and serene; the still small voice speaks peace to the spirit within man; and the sanctifying, cleansing power of the Spirit begins to manifest itself. (Teachings, pp. 149-150.) [Doctrinal New Testament Commentary, 1:142]

 

  The Spiritually Reborn Have Overcome the World

 

Bruce R. McConkie

Those who are born of the Spirit thereby -- that is, by virtue of their spiritual rebirth -- overcome the world. They die as to carnality and evil; they live as to spirituality and godliness. And it all comes to pass because they have faith in Christ. "Whosoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ is born of God," John says. Those who are born anew love the Lord and keep his commandments. "For this is the love of God, that we keep his commandments. ... For whatsoever is born of God overcometh the world: and this is the victory that overcometh the world, even our faith." There is no way to overcome the world except by turning to Christ and his gospel. It is by living the gospel that men forsake the world and are born again. "Who is he that overcometh the world, but he that believeth that Jesus is the Son of God?" (A New Witness for the Articles of Faith, p.289)



The Spiritual Born Again Become
the Sons and Daughters of Christ

 



Mosiah 5:7

7 And now, because of the covenant which ye have made ye shall be called the children of Christ, his sons, and his daughters; for behold, this day he hath spiritually begotten you; for ye say that your hearts are changed through faith on his name; therefore, ye are born of him and have become his sons and his daughters.

 

Bruce R. McConkie

Those who are born again not only live a new life, but they also have a new father. Their new life is one of righteousness, and their new father is God. They become the sons of God; or, more particularly, they become the sons and daughters of Jesus Christ. They bear, ever thereafter, the name of their new parent; that is, they take upon themselves the name of Christ and become Christians, not only in word but in very deed. They become by adoption the seed or offspring of Christ, the children in his family, the members of his household which is the perfect household of perfect faith. And further: Having become the sons of God (Christ), they also become joint-heirs with him of the fulness of the glory of the Father, thus becoming by adoption the sons of God the Father.

John tells us that the Lord Jesus, who came in time's meridian unto his own, was rejected by them. "But as many as received him as their Messiah and Savior, "to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name. (John 1:12.) Speaking of that same meridian day, the same Lord said in our day: "To as many as received me, gave I power to become my sons." Be it noted that true believers are not automatically born to a newness of life by the mere fact of belief alone. That belief and that acceptance of the Savior gives them power to become the sons of God. And in our day the divine word continues: "Even so will I give unto as many as will receive me, power to become my sons." And how are those who receive the Lord identified? By way of answer, he tells us: "Verily, verily, I say unto you, he that receiveth my gospel receiveth me; and he that receiveth not my gospel receiveth not me." (D&C 39:4-5.) Those who have accepted the fulness of the everlasting gospel as it has come again in our day through the instrumentality of Joseph Smith have power to become the sons of God; those who reject this heaven-sent message of salvation reject that Lord whose message it is and remain outside the Lord's family.

In addressing a congregation of contrite and penitent Nephites, King Benjamin, using that simplicity of speech and clarity of expression in which Book of Mormon prophets so excel, said to his fellow saints: "Because of the covenant which ye have made ye shall be called the children of Christ, his sons, and his daughters." They thus gain a new father, and he gains new children. "For behold, this day he hath spiritually begotten you." Their new birth is not a natural but a spiritual birth. "For ye say that your hearts are changed through faith on his name; therefore, ye are born of him and have become his sons and his daughters."

Thus it is that the saints are born of Christ because they have been born of the Spirit; they are alive in Christ because they enjoy the companionship of the Spirit, and they are members of his family because they are clean as he is clean. "And under this head ye are made free" -- being in Christ, they are free from the bondage of sin -- "and there is no other head [other than Christ our Head] whereby ye can be made free." Only those who accept Christ and receive the Spirit can free themselves from the sins of the world. "There is no other name given whereby salvation cometh; therefore, I would that ye should take upon you the name of Christ, all you that have entered into the covenant with God that ye should be obedient unto the end of your lives." (Mosiah 5:7-8.)

Those who receive the Lord Jesus and believe in their hearts that he is the Son of God by whom salvation comes; those who then covenant in the waters of baptism to serve him and keep his commandments; those who believe the gospel and are members of the earthly kingdom -- these are the ones who have power to become his sons and daughters. Thus they are the ones who take upon themselves his name.

In our day the divine word from the Lord Jesus commands: "Take upon you the name of Christ, and speak the truth in soberness. Behold, Jesus Christ is the name which is given of the Father, and there is none other name given whereby man can be saved; wherefore, all men must take upon them the name which is given of the Father, for in that name shall they be called at the last day; wherefore, if they know not the name by which they are called, they cannot have place in the kingdom of my Father." (D&C 18:21-25.)

It was ever thus. Isaiah prophesied of the "seed" of Christ. (Isaiah 53:10.) Abinadi says "his seed" consists of the prophets and saints who hearken to his word, who believe he will "redeem his people," who gain "a remission of their sins," and who are thus "heirs of the kingdom of God." (Mosiah 15:11.)

Our theologically gifted friend Paul teaches the doctrine of spiritual rebirth and of becoming sons and daughters of both the Father and the Son, explaining that true believers, converted souls, righteous saints, those who are born again, "walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit." To walk after the manner of the flesh is to live after the manner of the world; to walk after the manner of the Spirit is to overcome the world and live by the standards of the gospel. "For they that are after the flesh do mind the things of the flesh" -- they live carnal and evil lives -- but they that are after the Spirit the things of the Spirit. Theirs is a godly course of conduct. "For to be carnally minded is death; but to be spiritually minded is life and peace. Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: so then they that are in the flesh cannot please God." The Lord cannot look upon sin with the least degree of allowance. Those who live after the manner of the flesh are damned; those who bridle their passions and overcome the world are saved.

As to the saints of God, Paul says: "But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his." In the full and eternal sense even in the true church, only those saints who enjoy the companionship of the Spirit belong to the Lord; they are the only ones who are the Lord's people in the sense of gaining salvation. "And if Christ be in you, the body is dead because of sin; but the Spirit is life because of righteousness. But if the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you -- if you have the companionship of the Holy Ghost -- he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortal bodies by his Spirit that dwelleth in you." Ye shall be born again; ye shall become new creatures of the Holy Ghost; your bodies shall be quickened, shall be made new shall become fit tabernacles in which the Spirit may dwell. "Therefore, brethren, we are debtors, not to the flesh, to live after the flesh." The saints must not live in sin. "For if ye live after the flesh, ye shall die: but if ye through the Spirit do mortify the deeds of the body, ye shall live." Those who live after the manner of the world are spiritually dead; those who control the appetites of the flesh and pursue a godly course are alive spiritually. "For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God. For ye have not received the spirit of bondage again to fear." Ye are made free from the bondage of sin through Christ. "But ye have received the Spirit of adoption [of sonship], whereby we cry, Abba, Father." Abba is an Aramaic word that means father; the meaning here is that we sense and feel our newly found relationship with God the Father and hence feel free to address him in a friendly and familiar way.

"The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God: And if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ; if so be that we suffer with him, that we may be also glorified together." That is, because we have been adopted into the family of Christ, because we have taken his name upon us, and because he has accepted us in full, we are also accepted by his Father. We become joint-heirs with the Son. We are adopted into a state of sonship by the Father. Christ is his natural heir, and as adopted sons, we become joint-heirs, receiving, inheriting, and possessing as does the Natural Heir. Because we conform "to the image of his Son," we are also "glorified" with him. (Romans 8:4-30.) And thus in like manner, the inhabitants of all worlds "are begotten sons and daughters unto God" the Father through the atonement of Christ the Son. (D&C 76:24.) [A New Witness for the Articles of Faith, pp. 284-287]



  Spiritual Rebith is the Beginning of Righteousness

Bruce R. McConkie

"How can these things be?" Nicodemus asked. 'How can the water of baptism, and the Spirit of the Lord, and the blood of the Only Begotten, constitute a birth into the kingdom of heaven? How can the serene and calm influence of the Spirit--the still small voice, as it were--descend, as from nowhere, upon a human soul?'

"Art thou a master of Israel, and knowest not these things?" comes the reply. 'Art thou an appointed teacher, a guide and a light to the people, a member of the Great Sanhedrin itself, and thou knowest not that spiritual rebirth is the very beginning of righteousness, and that until men are born again they are not so much as on the path leading to eternal life?' Was there just a touch of irony in our Lord's response? (The Mortal Messiah, 1:475)
 

D&C 109:14-15

14 And do thou grant, Holy Father, that all those who shall worship in this house may be taught words of wisdom out of the best books, and that they may seek learning even by study, and also by faith, as thou hast said;

15 And that they may grow up in thee, and receive a fulness of the Holy Ghost . . .

 

For Israel to get this new heart, they must accept the gospel of Jesus Christ.

At the age of accountability, I am responsible for the second spiritual death.  The Atonement and the ordinances help me overcome this death.  Judgement happens after resurrection and if I am worthy, I inherit a kingdom of glory, if not I go to perdition.  Helaman 14

 

Teachings Concerning
Spiritual Death

What is Spiritual Death

Joseph Fielding Smith

Spiritual death is defined as a state of spiritual alienation from God--the eternal separation from the Supreme Being; condemnation to everlasting punishment is also called the second death. In other words, the second or spiritual death, which is the final judgment passed upon the wicked, is the same as the first death, banishment from the presence of the Lord. (Doctrines of Salvation, 2:217)
 

Bruce R. McConkie

Spiritual death is to be cast out of the presence of the Lord, to die as to the things of righteousness, to die as to the things of the Spirit. Spirit beings as such never die in the sense of annihilation or in the sense that their spirit bodies are disorganized; rather, they continue to live to all eternity either as spirits or as resurrected personages. (Mormon Doctrine, p. 756)
 

Dallin H. Oaks

Jesus Christ is also the life of the world because he has atoned for the sins of the world. By yielding to temptation, Adam and Eve were [page 65] "cut off from the presence of the Lord" (Hel. 14:16). In the scriptures this separation is called spiritual death (see Hel. 14:16; D&C 29:41). ["The Light and Life of the World," Ensign, Nov. 1987, pp. 64-65]
 

Russell M. Nelson

But there is another type of separation known in scripture as spiritual death. (See 2 Ne. 9:12; Alma 12:16; Alma 42:9; Hel. 14:16, 18.) It "is defined as a state of spiritual alienation from God." (Joseph Fielding Smith, Doctrines of Salvation, comp. Bruce R. McConkie, 3 vols., Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1954-56, 2:217.) Thus, one can be very much alive physically but dead spiritually.

Spiritual death is more likely when goals are unbalanced toward things physical. Paul explained this concept to the Romans: "If ye live after the flesh, ye shall die: but if ye through the Spirit do mortify the deeds of the body, ye shall live." (Rom. 8:13.)

If physical death should strike before moral wrongs have been made right, opportunity for repentance will have been forfeited. Thus, "the [real] sting of death is sin." (1 Cor. 15:56.)

Even the Savior cannot save us in our sins. He will redeem us from our sins, but only upon condition of our repentance. We are responsible for our own spiritual survival or death. (See Rom. 8:13-14; Hel. 14:18; D&C 29:41-45.) ["Doors of Death," Ensign, May 1992, p. 73]
 

Joseph F. Smith

  • We are called mortal beings because in us are seeds of death, but in reality we are immortal beings, because there is also within us the germ of eternal life. Man is a dual being, composed of the spirit which gives life, force, intelligence and capacity to man, and the body which is the tenement of the spirit and is suited to its form, adapted to its necessities, and acts in harmony with it, and to its utmost capacity yields obedience to the will of the spirit. The two combined constitute the soul. The body is dependent upon the spirit, and the spirit during its natural occupancy of the body is subject to the laws which apply to and govern it in the mortal state. In this natural body are the seeds of weakness and decay, which, when fully ripened or untimely plucked up, in the language of scripture, is called "the temporal death." The spirit is also subject to what is termed in the scriptures and revelations from God, "spiritual death." The same as that which befell our first parents, when, through disobedience and transgression, they became subject to the will of Satan, and were thrust out from the presence of the Lord and became spiritually dead, which the Lord says, "is the first death, even that same death which is the last death, which is spiritual, which shall be pronounced upon the wicked when I shall say, Depart, ye cursed!" And the Lord further says, "But behold, I say unto you, that I the Lord God gave unto Adam and unto his seed that they should not die as to the temporal death, until I the Lord God should send forth angels to declare unto them repentance and redemption (from the first death), through faith on the name of mine Only Begotten Son. And thus did I, the Lord God, appoint unto man the days of his probation; that by his natural death he might be raised in immortality unto eternal life, even as many as would believe; and they that believe not, unto eternal damnation, for they cannot be redeemed from their spiritual fall, because they repent not." From the natural death, that is the death of the body, and also from the first death, "which is spiritual," there is redemption through belief on the name of the Only Begotten Son, in connection with repentance and obedience to the ordinances of the gospel, declared by holy angels, for if one "believe," he must also obey; but from the "second death," even that same death which is the first death, "which is spiritual," and from which man may be redeemed through faith and obedience, and which will again be pronounced upon the wicked when God shall say, "depart, ye cursed," there is no redemption, so far as light on this matter has been revealed. (See Doc. and Cov. 29:41-44.)

It is written that "all manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men" who receive me and repent; "but the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven unto men." If men will not repent and come unto Christ, through the ordinances of his gospel, they cannot be redeemed from their spiritual fall, but must remain forever subject to the will of Satan and the consequent spiritual darkness or death unto which our first parents fell, subjecting all their posterity thereto, and from which none can be redeemed but by belief or faith on the name of the Only Begotten Son and obedience to the laws of God. But, thanks be to the eternal Father, through the merciful provisions of the gospel, all mankind will have the opportunity of escape, or deliverance, from this spiritual death, either in time or in eternity, for not until they are freed from the first can they become subject unto the second death, still if they repent not "they cannot be redeemed from their spiritual fall," and will continue subject to the will of Satan, the first spiritual death, so long as "they repent not, and thereby reject Christ and his gospel;" but what of those who do believe, repent of their sins, obey the gospel, enter into its covenants, receive the keys of the Priesthood and the knowledge of the truth by revelation and the gift of the Holy Ghost, and afterwards turn away wholly from that light and knowledge? They "become a law unto themselves," and "will to abide in sin;" of such it is written, "whoso breaketh this covenant, after he hath received it, and altogether turneth therefrom, shall not have forgiveness in this world nor in the world to come." And again, "Thus saith the Lord, concerning all those who know my power, and have been made partakers thereof, and suffered themselves, through the power of the devil, to be overcome, and to deny the truth and defy my power--they are they who are the sons of perdition, of whom I say that it had been better for them never to have been born, for they are vessels of wrath, doomed to suffer the wrath of God, with the devil and his angels in eternity; concerning whom I have said there is no forgiveness in this world nor in the world to come, having denied the Holy Spirit after having received it, and having denied the Only Begotten Son of the Father--having crucified him unto themselves, and put him to an open shame."--Doc. and Cov. 76:31-35.

Now, there is a difference between this class and those who simply repent not and reject the gospel in the flesh. Of these latter it is written, "they shall be brought forth by the resurrection of the dead, through the triumph and the glory of the Lamb," and "shall be redeemed in the due time of the Lord after the sufferings of his wrath." But of the others it is said, "they shall not be redeemed," for "they are the only ones on whom the second death shall have any power." The others, never having been redeemed from the first, cannot be doomed to the second death, or in other words cannot be made to suffer eternally the wrath of God, without hope of redemption through repentance, but must continue to suffer the first death until they repent, and are redeemed therefrom through the power of the atonement and the gospel of salvation, thereby being brought to the possession of all the keys and blessings to which they will be capable of attaining or to which they may be entitled, through the mercy, justice and power of the everlasting God; or, on the other hand, forever remain bound in the chains of spiritual darkness, bondage and banishment from his presence, kingdom and glory. The "temporal death" is one thing, and the "spiritual death" is another thing. The body may be dissolved and become extinct as an organism, although the elements of which it is composed are indestructible or eternal, but I hold it as self-evident that the spiritual organism is an eternal, immortal being, destined to enjoy eternal happiness and a fulness of joy, or suffer the wrath of God, and misery--a just condemnation, eternally. Adam became spiritually dead, yet he lived to endure it until freed therefrom by the power of the atonement, through repentance, etc. Those upon whom the second death shall fall will live to suffer and endure it, but without hope of redemption. The death of the body, or natural death, is but a temporary circumstance to which all were subjected through the fall, and from which all will be restored or resurrected by the power of God, through the atonement of Christ. (Gospel Doctrine, pp.14-16)

  • But I want to speak a word or two in relation to another death, which is a more terrible death than that of the body. When Adam, our first parent, partook of the forbidden fruit, transgressed the law of God, and became subject unto Satan, he was banished from the presence of God, and was thrust out into outer spiritual darkness. This was the first death. Yet living, he was dead--dead to God, dead to light and truth, dead spiritually; cast out from the presence of God; communication between the Father and the Son was cut off. He was as absolutely thrust out from the presence of God as was Satan and the hosts that followed him. That was spiritual death. But the Lord said that he would not suffer Adam nor his posterity to come to the temporal death until they should have the means by which they might be redeemed from the first death, which is spiritual. Therefore angels were sent unto Adam, who taught him the gospel, and revealed to him the principle by which he could be redeemed from the first death, and be brought back from banishment and outer darkness into the marvelous light of the gospel. He was taught faith, repentance, and baptism for the remission of sins, in the name of Jesus Christ, who should come in the meridian of time and take away the sin of the world, and was thus given a chance to be redeemed from the spiritual death before he should die the temporal death.

Now, all the world today, I am sorry to say, with the exception of a handful of people who have obeyed the new and everlasting covenant, are suffering this spiritual death. They are cast out from the presence of God. They are without God, without gospel truth, and without the power of redemption; for they know not God nor his gospel. In order that they may be redeemed and saved from the spiritual death which has spread over the world like a pall, they must repent of their sins, and be baptized by one having authority, for the remission of their sins, that they may be born of God. That is why we want these young men to go out into the world to preach the gospel. While they themselves understand but little, perhaps, the germ of life is in them. They have been born again, they have received the gift of the Holy Ghost, and they have the authority of the holy Priesthood, by which they can administer in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Though they may know but little in the beginning, they can learn, and as they learn they can preach, and as they have opportunity they can baptize for the remission of sins. Therefore, we want them to do their duty at home. We want them above all things to be pure in heart. (Gospel Doctrine, pp.432-433)
 
 

Atonement Overcomes Spiritual Death

 

Bruce R. McConkie

To atone is to ransom, reconcile, expiate, redeem, reclaim, absolve, propitiate, make amends, pay the penalty. Thus the atonement of Christ is designed to ransom men from the effects of the fall of Adam in that both spiritual and temporal death are conquered; their lasting effect is nullified. The spiritual death of the fall is replaced by the spiritual life of the atonement, in that all who believe and obey the gospel law gain spiritual or eternal life -- life in the presence of God where those who enjoy it are alive to things of righteousness or things of the Spirit. (Mormon Doctrine, p.62)

Children do sin before the age of eight, they know what is happening, and that is why there is a baptism for the remission of sins. Great things are required at the hands of their parents to teach them doctrine.  Little children can learn doctrine!

The more remarkable the spiritual birth was the greater the spiritual death was, like Alma.  Children and we do not have such a change as he had.

Bruce remembers his rebrith at 17.

(Doctrine and Covenants 29:46-48.) – Being accountable is a process. Yet they are redeemed at death

 

46 But behold, I say unto you, that little children are redeemed from the foundation of the world through mine Only Begotten;

 

47 Wherefore, they cannot sin, for power is not given unto Satan to tempt little children, until they begin to become accountable before me;

48 For it is given unto them even as I will, according to mine own pleasure, that great things may be required at the hand of their fathers.

It does not say babysitters, or daycare providers, it is up to the parents to teach.  Protection by the Atonement up to that age

Teachings of Harold B. Lee cover this in great detai

Baptism by sprinkling combines baptism with washing and anointing, there was confusion in doctrine as two ordinances were mixed up.

Ezekiel 37 in its context, what is the Lord saying.  It is about Israel’s restoration back to the land.

The reunification of the North and South kingdoms and the restoration

Valley = scattered Israel >>> Wind = Spirit, breath >>> Four winds = Israel’s scattering

Unite all of scattered Israel, both the living and the dead, and then we go back to the land of promise.

(Ezekiel 37:1-14.)

 

1 The hand of the LORD was upon me, and carried me out in the spirit of the LORD, and set me down in the midst of the valley which was full of bones,

 

2 And caused me to pass by them round about: and, behold, there were very many in the open valley; and, lo, they were very dry.

 

3 And he said unto me, Son of man, can these bones live? And I answered, O Lord GOD, thou knowest.

 

4 Again he said unto me, Prophesy upon these bones, and say unto them, O ye dry bones, hear the word of the LORD.

 

5 Thus saith the Lord GOD unto these bones; Behold, I will cause breath to enter into you, and ye shall live:

 

6 And I will lay sinews upon you, and will bring up flesh upon you, and cover you with skin, and put breath in you, and ye shall live; and ye shall know that I am the LORD.

 

7 So I prophesied as I was commanded: and as I prophesied, there was a noise, and behold a shaking, and the bones came together, bone to his bone.

 

8 And when I beheld, lo, the sinews and the flesh came up upon them, and the skin covered them above: but there was no breath in them.

 

9 Then said he unto me, Prophesy unto the wind, prophesy, son of man, and say to the wind, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Come from the four winds, O breath, and breathe upon these slain, that they may live.

 

10 So I prophesied as he commanded me, and the breath came into them, and they lived, and stood up upon their feet, an exceeding great army.

 

11 ¶ Then he said unto me, Son of man, these bones are the whole house of Israel: behold, they say, Our bones are dried, and our hope is lost: we are cut off for our parts.

 

12 Therefore prophesy and say unto them, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, O my people, I will open your graves, and cause you to come up out of your graves, and bring you into the land of Israel.

 

13 And ye shall know that I am the LORD, when I have opened your graves, O my people, and brought you up out of your graves,

 

14 And shall put my spirit in you, and ye shall live, and I shall place you in your own land: then shall ye know that I the LORD have spoken it, and performed it, saith the LORD.

 

Elder Nelson’s recent conference address teaches the gathering on both sides of the veil

The Millennuim will give us 1000 years to be with Christ to become perfected.  What a great day that will be

The 2nd type is uniting the 2 kingdoms, as latter day saints we take this out of context, it’s about the restoration, granted we know it’s the Book of Mormon and the Bible.

(2 Nephi 3:12.)

12 Wherefore, the fruit of thy loins shall write; and the fruit of the loins of Judah shall write; and that which shall be written by the fruit of thy loins, and also that which shall be written by the fruit of the loins of Judah, shall grow together, unto the confounding of false doctrines and laying down of contentions, and establishing peace among the fruit of thy loins, and bringing them to the knowledge of their fathers in the latter days, and also to the knowledge of my covenants, saith the Lord.

We study all of the standard works because they grow together and teach correct doctrine.

(Ezekiel 37:15-28.) – Millennial restoration

 

15 ¶ The word of the LORD came again unto me, saying,

 

16 Moreover, thou son of man, take thee one stick, and write upon it, For Judah, and for the children of Israel his companions: then take another stick, and write upon it, For Joseph, the stick of Ephraim, and for all the house of Israel his companions:

 

17 And join them one to another into one stick; and they shall become one in thine hand.

 

18 ¶ And when the children of thy people shall speak unto thee, saying, Wilt thou not shew us what thou meanest by these?

 

19 Say unto them, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I will take the stick of Joseph, which is in the hand of Ephraim, and the tribes of Israel his fellows, and will put them with him, even with the stick of Judah, and make them one stick, and they shall be one in mine hand.

 

20 ¶ And the sticks whereon thou writest shall be in thine hand before their eyes.

 

21 And say unto them, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I will take the children of Israel from among the heathen, whither they be gone, and will gather them on every side, and bring them into their own land:

 

22 And I will make them one nation in the land upon the mountains of Israel; and one king shall be king to them all: and they shall be no more two nations, neither shall they be divided into two kingdoms any more at all:

 

23 Neither shall they defile themselves any more with their idols, nor with their detestable things, nor with any of their transgressions: but I will save them out of all their dwellingplaces, wherein they have sinned, and will cleanse them: so shall they be my people, and I will be their God.

 

24 And David my servant shall be king over them; and they all shall have one shepherd: they shall also walk in my judgments, and observe my statutes, and do them.

 

25 And they shall dwell in the land that I have given unto Jacob my servant, wherein your fathers have dwelt; and they shall dwell therein, even they, and their children, and their children's children for ever: and my servant David shall be their prince for ever.

 

26 Moreover I will make a covenant of peace with them; it shall be an everlasting covenant with them: and I will place them, and multiply them, and will set my sanctuary in the midst of them for evermore.

 

27 My tabernacle also shall be with them: yea, I will be their God, and they shall be my people.

 

28 And the heathen shall know that I the LORD do sanctify Israel, when my sanctuary shall be in the midst of them for evermore.

The Northern kingdom has a book, where is it?  The Book of Mormon

THE LORD IS THERE (EZEKIEL 37-48)

 

KENT P. JACKSON

 

When news came to Ezekiel in Mesopotamia that Jerusalem had fallen (Ezek. 33:21), the Jews who were with him in exile should finally have realized "that a prophet hath been among them" (Ezek. 33:33). For years he had foreseen Jerusalem's destruction, and now that it had taken place, the focus of his revelations naturally turned to other things. Thus, from chapter 34 to the end of his book, Ezekiel's message shifted to a focus on the latter days, emphasizing things that were far into the future from his own time. These include the restoration of the house of Israel, the reunion of the kingdoms of Israel and Judah, the efforts of the ungodly in their opposition to the Lord's people and the Lord's work, the destruction of the wicked prior to Christ's coming, and his glorious reign as Israel's millennial king. fn

 

The last chapters of Ezekiel are among the most symbolic, dramatic, and intriguing in all of scripture. As a result, unfortunately, they have often been misused to create doctrinal and historical mischief. All Latter-day Saints should realize that no prophecy in the Old Testament can be fully understood independently of modern revelation. A careful application of this principle is good insurance against misinterpretation. Modern revelation provides the perspective and the context that are necessary for understanding the revelations of the past, making it an indispensable tool for which we will always be thankful. fn We should have this ever in mind as we explore Ezekiel's prophecies of things yet to come.

 

Bones and Sticks (Ezek. 37)

 

Ezekiel 37 records two highly symbolic revelations, each of which describes in powerful images the restoration of the house of Israel. Although that is their central focus, they also teach other things that are of significant value to latter-day readers.

 

At the beginning of chapter 37, Ezekiel was shown a vision of a valley full of dry bones. In response to the Lord's command, he prophesied to the bones that they would come back to life. With a rattling sound "the bones came together, bone to his bone" (Ezek. 37:7). Tendons, flesh, and skin covered the reassembled bodies in due course, and "breath came into them, and they lived, and stood up upon their feet, an exceeding great army" (Ezek. 37:10).

 

As is common in Ezekiel's revelations, the symbolic activity or vision is followed by a clear interpretation. "These bones are the whole house of Israel," the Lord said. The metaphor of scattered bones well describes Israel's pitiful condition: they had been destroyed as a nation, their temple and holy city lay in ruins, thousands of their number had been killed in the Babylonian invasion (and earlier invasions as well), and their Davidic monarch and thousands of their countrymen had been taken into exile. They lamented, "our bones are dried, and our hope is lost: we are cut off for our parts" (Ezek. 37:11).

 

Ezekiel's vision of the dry bones announced to ancient and modern Israel that their scattering would not be forever. The Lord would bring them out of their graves, assemble their scattered parts, give them life, and reestablish them in their own land (Ezek. 37:12-14). The image of resurrection in this passage shows that though the house of Israel were dead, it would be restored again—to life and to a renewed covenant with God.

 

The following section of the chapter, Ezekiel's vision of the uniting of the two sticks (Ezek. 37:15-28), is one of the Bible's best-known prophecies for Latter-day Saints. But most are aware only of its secondary message, the joining of scriptural records, and not of the primary focus of the revelation: the restoration of the house of Israel with Christ as king.

 

As the revelation began, the Lord commanded Ezekiel to take in hand two "sticks." The Hebrew word translated "stick," 'es,Notes

 

 has as its primary meanings "tree" and "wood." fn The most likely meaning in this context is a piece of wood, a board. One well-known interpretation in the Church proposes that Ezekiel envisioned a writing board called a "diptych," which consisted of two pieces of wood hinged together to fold like the covers of a book. The inside surfaces of the boards were coated with wax, providing a convenient and reusable writing medium. fn Although this explanation is not certain, it is reasonable and could well approximate what Ezekiel saw. fn In any case, the boards in the revelation were symbols meant to represent greater things, and thus their exact nature is not as significant as the message conveyed through them.

 

Ezekiel was commanded to write on the first board, "Belonging to Judah and the children of Israel his companions." On the second he was commanded to write, "Belonging to Joseph—the stick of Ephraim—and all the house of Israel his companions" (Ezek. 37:16, my translations). These are phrases of identification that were very commonly used in ancient Israel to designate ownership. The message is clear: one board belonged to Judah and the other to Joseph.

 

As the revelation continued, Ezekiel was instructed to place the two boards together in one: "and they shall become one in thine hand" (Ezek. 37:17). This revelation is one of several in which the Lord commanded Ezekiel to engage in highly symbolic actions. fn As "visual aids," they were meant to convey messages of importance to the house of Israel, and they were almost always followed by explanations of their purpose and meaning. In this case the explanation follows, in verses 18 through 28. When we add to the material provided in those verses some significant things that we learn through modern revelation, we gain a clear understanding of the truths Ezekiel taught by means of the two "sticks."

 

As is apparent in Ezekiel 37:21-27, the central message of Ezekiel's revelation is the restoration of the house of Israel. For Latter-day Saints the word restoration usually evokes thoughts of Joseph Smith and the restoration of lost truth and authority in the latter days. But the restoration, in its greatest sense, involves much more than that. As Ezekiel reported, it includes the gathering of the dispersed of Israel (Ezek. 37:21), their reestablishment in promised lands (Ezek. 37:21-22, 25), the restoration of Judah and Israel into one nation (Ezek. 37:22), the restoration of their status as a worthy covenant people before the Lord (Ezek. 37:23-24, 26-28), and the restoration of the Lord himself to his rightful position as Israel's divine king (Ezek. 37:22, 24-25). These constitute the central focus of Ezekiel 37 and of many other important prophecies as well. For all of these the Lord provided a sign: the bringing together of the two inscribed pieces of wood—the "stick of Judah," and the "stick of Joseph, which is in the hand of Ephraim" (Ezek. 37:19).

 

Our distinctive Latter-day Saint point of view regarding Ezekiel's sticks came in a revelation to the Prophet Joseph Smith in August 1830, in which the Lord spoke of Moroni, "whom I have sent unto you to reveal the Book of Mormon, containing the fulness of my everlasting gospel, to whom I have committed the keys of the record of the stick of Ephraim" (D&C 27:5). Ezekiel's visionary stick of Joseph in Ephraim's hand thus represents Joseph's scriptural record, the Book of Mormon. It follows therefore that Judah's stick represents the scriptural record of Judah, the Bible.

 

Ezekiel was not the only prophet who knew of the coming together of the two scriptural records. Almost a thousand years earlier, ancient Joseph received a revelation in which he learned of the joining of the record of his descendants with that of the tribe of Judah. That would be done under the ministry of the great latter-day seer, Joseph Smith, who would be an instrument in the Lord's hand to bring to pass the restoration of Israel. Lehi, who found this revelation on the plates of brass, considered it to be significant enough to give it special emphasis for his family, and Nephi recorded it on his small plates (2 Ne. 3:4-24). The Lord told ancient Joseph: "Wherefore the fruit of thy loins shall write, and the fruit of the loins of Judah shall write; and that which shall be written by the fruit of thy loins, and also that which shall be written by the fruit of the loins of Judah, shall grow together unto the confounding of false doctrines, and laying down of contentions, and establishing peace among the fruit of thy loins, and bringing them to a knowledge of their fathers in the latter days; and also to the knowledge of my covenants, saith the Lord" (JST Gen. 50:31; 2 Ne. 3:12; emphasis added; see also 1 Ne. 13:41).

 

The coming together of the two records is thus a central event in the restoration of the house of Israel. Indeed, it is an essential ingredient in the Lord's latter-day work, for the gospel message thus produced will confound false doctrine, lay down contentions, establish peace between the two estranged halves of the house of Israel, and bring them to a knowledge of God's covenants (cf. Ezek. 37:22-23, 26-27). fn It is no wonder, then, that Ezekiel would view the bringing together of the two records, the sticks of Joseph and Judah, as being the very symbol of the restoration of Israel.

 

Other prophets also foretold this event as the sign of Israel's restoration. The Savior himself did when he ministered to the children of Lehi following his resurrection. While teaching them of the restoration of Israel, he spoke of the coming forth of their record, the Book of Mormon. He called it a sign: "I give unto you a sign, that ye may know the time when these things shall be about to take place—that I shall gather in, from their long dispersion, my people, O house of Israel, and shall establish again among them my Zion" (3 Ne. 21:1). The sign would be the coming forth of their record, by which both they and the Gentiles would know that they are "a remnant of the house of Jacob" (3 Ne. 21:2; see also vv. 3-6). "And when these things come to pass that thy seed shall begin to know these thing—it shall be a sign unto them, that they may know that the work of the Father hath already commenced unto the fulfilling of the covenant which he hath made unto the people who are of the house of Israel" (3 Ne. 21:7).

 

Mormon, who compiled the record of Joseph, also saw its publication as a sign of Israel's restoration: "When the Lord shall see fit, in his wisdom, that these sayings shall come unto the Gentiles according to his word, then ye may know that the covenant which the Father hath made with the children of Israel, concerning their restoration to the lands of their inheritance, is already beginning to be fulfilled" (3 Ne. 29:1; see also vv. 2-9). Because the Bible was already known when the Book of Mormon was first published in 1830, the appearance of the Book of Mormon was, in effect, the coming together of the two records—the sign that the reunion of the branches of the house of Israel and their reestablishment in the covenants would soon take place. fn

 

The latter-day restoration of the house of Israel, according to Ezekiel, would involve not only the gathering of the dispersed to their promised land (Ezek. 37:21, 25), but it would also entail the reunification of the two rival nations, Israel and Judah (Ezek. 37:22). The united monarchy of David and Solomon split into two separate countries shortly after Solomon's death (1 Kgs. 12), with the northern ten tribes as the kingdom of Israel and the tribes of Judah and Benjamin as the kingdom of Judah. Since that time they had been rival kingdoms with separate histories, separate ruling families, and separate destinies. Israel—which was frequently called "Joseph" or "Ephraim" fn—was destroyed by the Assyrians a century and a half before Ezekiel received this revelation. Most of its people who survived the warfare were deported to other parts of the Assyrian empire (2 Kgs. 17:1-24), from which their descendants now have lost their identity and have become assimilated into the nations of the world. By the time of this revelation, Judah had been beaten by the Babylonians. Its capital city, Jerusalem, lay in ruins, and much of its population (including Ezekiel) had been deported to Mesopotamia or had been scattered or directed elsewhere (including Lehi).

 

Under these circumstances, Ezekiel's revelation of the reunification of Israel and Judah was remarkable. Like the two inscribed boards, they would be brought together again and would become "one nation . . . , and they shall be no more two nations, neither shall they be divided into two kingdoms any more at all" (Ezek. 37:22).

 

This is a prophecy of greatest importance that still has not been fulfilled. But we know who the two nations are today, and we know what must be done before they will be brought together. Judah consists of the Jews, who are scattered in most of the nations of the earth. Aside from the very few who have accepted the gospel, they are still outside the covenants which the Lord established with their fathers in biblical times. Israel is The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, the vast majority of whose members belong, either by birth or by adoption, to the chief northern tribes of Ephraim and Manasseh. fn The prophesied reunification of the two groups will come when the descendants of Judah accept the covenants of the gospel of Jesus Christ and join with their brothers and sisters of Israel in the Lord's Church. It appears that the complete fulfillment of this prophecy will not be seen until after Christ's second coming.

 

Ezekiel's prophecy of the restoration of Israel's kingship is also remarkable. As in chapter 34, he used the name David for the messianic ruler: "And David my servant shall be king over them; and they all shall have one shepherd. . . . And my servant David shall be their prince for ever" (Ezek. 37:24-25). Jesus Christ is the latter-day "David," the "King," the "Shepherd," and the "Prince" of Israel. In the Millennium, the time in which all of Ezekiel's promises will find their ultimate realization, he "will reign personally upon the earth," as Joseph Smith prophesied (A of F 10). As I have explained elsewhere (see the discussion at Ezek. 34:23-24 in Chap. 27 of this volume), we need not look to anyone else but Christ as Israel's millennial king, because the scriptures clearly identify him in that role.

 

The restored Israelite nation, in its several millennial locations, will be Zion, a community of faithful individuals who have overcome sin and have joined the Lord in covenants. They will be those, as Moroni wrote, "whose garments are white through the blood of the Lamb . . . ,for they have been washed in the blood of the Lamb; and they are they who were scattered and gathered in from the four quarters of the earth, and from the north countries, fn and are partakers of the fulfilling of the covenant which God made with their father, Abraham" (Ether 13:10-11). When the covenant is renewed and the relationship restored between Jehovah and his people, it will be "a covenant of peace . . . an everlasting covenant" (Ezek. 37:26). And again the Lord will affirm, "I will be their God, and they shall be my people" (Ezek. 37:27; see also v. 23).

 

(Kent P. Jackson, ed., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 4: 1 Kings to Malachi [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1993], 300.)

Bruce didn’t want to discuss chapters 38-39 very much.  He said it is better to concern ourselves with the restoration then with what war begins when.  Here are some notes from Kent P. Jackson.

Apocalyptic Revelation

 

 

There are several sections of the scriptures in which visions are presented in a highly symbolic revelatory style called "apocalyptic." fn An understanding of this kind of writing will enhance our study of the remainder of the book of Ezekiel. Apocalyptic vision is the mode of revelation in which the observer is withdrawn from the earthly sphere with its normal circumstances of time and space and is moved, as it were, into the realm of the divine. In this realm he sees things no longer from an earthly perspective but from the perspective of the visionary sphere. Most often what he sees there cannot be described in earthly terms and can only be characterized with the use of vivid, dramatic symbols, most of which transcend our understanding of "normal" space, logic, time, and the rules of science as we understand them. Ezekiel's visions in chapters 1 and 10 are excellent examples of this, as are Daniel's revelations in chapters 7 through 12. fn

 

Apocalyptic vision is characterized by what is called "dualism"—the idea of the universal struggle between the forces of evil and good. In the here-and-now the forces of evil usually prevail. But there will be an end-of-the-world time in which the forces of good, God and his chosen Saints, will triumph over the forces of evil, Satan and his hosts. The victory of right over wrong will not take place as a result of the natural flow of history. Instead, there will be a dramatic break with the past, as God and his forces will stop the course of history to defeat the powers of darkness and bring the world into the final age of peace and glory. God's ultimate victory is sure; it is predetermined.

 

This kind of revelation is highly typological—it abounds in vivid symbols, or "types." The types frequently are patterns that represent more than one specific thing; often they represent whole categories. fn Apocalyptic prophecies are "fulfilled" whenever the categories that are depicted exist. In other words, they can be "fulfilled" more than once and with different individuals or nations involved. At the same time, however, they point to a grand and ultimate fulfillment, on a universal scale, in a last-days setting.

 

The symbolism in apocalyptic vision is thus much different from metaphor, the literary imagery that is used so abundantly throughout the Old Testament. Metaphor is meant to be understood. For the most part it is easily comprehended by those who are familiar with the culture, history, language, geography, and social circumstances in which the scripture arose. fn Apocalyptic vision, in striking contrast, is meant to be understood fully only with the help of other revelation. The vision usually requires an angelic interpreter or a companion revelation to unlock its meaning. fn Joseph Smith taught this principle:

 

When the prophets speak of seeing beasts in their visions, they saw the images—types to represent certain things. And at the same time they received the interpretation as to what those images or types were designed to represent. I make this broad declaration, that where God ever gives a vision of an image, or beast, or figure of any kind, he always holds himself responsible to give a revelation or interpretation of the meaning thereof, otherwise we are not responsible or accountable for our belief in it. Don't be afraid of being damned for not knowing the meaning of a vision or figure where God had not given a revelation or interpretation on the subject. fn

 

Nephi was accompanied through the symbolic world of the vision of the tree of life by a heavenly messenger, who translated its symbols for him (1 Ne. 8-14). Modern readers can understand its meaning because of the interpretation the messenger provided. In several other apocalyptic visions, however, the Lord has not yet seen fit to provide an interpretation in the scriptures. Thus we must read them with caution and recognize that we will not fully understand them until the Lord makes their meaning known.

 

Gog's Invasion of Israel (Ezek. 38-39)

 

Ezekiel 38 and 39 contain a vision that exhibits some important traits of apocalyptic revelation. fn The vision depicts an invasion of "Israel" by a foreign power called "Gog" of the land of "Magog," the "chief prince of Meshech and Tubal" (Ezek. 38:1). Gog and his forces will attack the "mountains of Israel," whose people will have been "brought forth out of the nations" and will be dwelling safely (Ezek. 38:7-8). Like "a cloud to cover the land," he and his allies—"a great company, and a mighty army"—will advance on the Lord's people (Ezek. 38:15-16). But the Lord will not allow them to succeed. With earthquake, sword, pestilence, blood, rain, hailstones, fire, and brimstone the Lord will intervene to stop Gog's attack; he and his armies will be slaughtered (Ezek. 38:19-39:8). So massive will be Gog's armies and so thorough their defeat that for seven years the people of Israel will gather the weapons of their defeated enemies and use them for fuel. Their corpses will be so abundant that it will take seven months to bury them. Even after that, individuals will be employed to go through the land to find the bodies not yet buried (Ezek. 39:9-16). Next is depicted a huge feast, in which the birds and the animals will gorge themselves on the blood and flesh of the slain (Ezek. 39:17-20; see also D&C 29:20) fn

 

Apocalyptic elements are readily apparent in this vision, suggesting that it is an apocalyptic scene and not necessarily a literal transcript of one specific future event. The latter-day setting of the prophecy seems clear. The Lord's people are called "Israel," and they have been "gathered out of many people" and "brought forth out of the nations" (Ezek. 38:8). It seems likely that Israel here does not represent a latter-day political entity, country, or geographical location, but the Lord's people, wherever they may be found. As President Spencer W. Kimball taught, "the gathering of Israel consists of joining the true church and their coming to a knowledge of the true God." fn Israel thus represents the Lord's Saints, the members of his Church who have gathered to the covenants of his gospel throughout the nations of the world.

 

In the symbolic vision, Gog, coming with vast armies from distant unknown lands, sets as his goal the devastation and plunder of the Lord's people. In apocalyptic fashion, the figure "Gog" here probably does not represent a real person or nation who will attack the Saints with military force. Instead, he and his hosts seem to represent the powers of evil that are arrayed against the Saints, manifested in a variety of ways, places, and times. Satan is the very embodiment of this evil and the archenemy of the Lord and his followers. As the vision depicts, the forces of evil will not be allowed to prevail. With a mighty act so characteristic of apocalyptic scenes, the Lord himself will intervene to put an end to evil and its consequences.

 

When will this prophecy he "fulfilled"? As stated above, this kind of apocalyptic typology often represents entire categories rather than specific individuals or events. But there are enough close parallels between this prophecy and others (both apocalyptic and predictive), that the time-frame for its fulfillment seems apparent.

 

In the period in which we now live, the gathering of the house of Israel and the establishment of Zion have commenced. Satan's forces, in a variety of manifestations, are engaged in relentless battle against Israel, that is, against individual Saints and the Church collectively. As other scriptures teach us, their efforts will increase in intensity as the coming of Christ draws near (see 1 Ne. 14:11-14). Like the hosts of Gog, however, they will not succeed in their efforts to destroy the Lord's Church. Instead, all forms of wickedness will be wiped from the earth in preparation for the Savior's coming in glory, which will usher in a thousand-year era of millennial peace.

 

The Book of Mormon prophet Nephi recorded a revelation similar to that of Ezekiel, in which he described this same effort of Satan and his followers to destroy the Saints (1 Ne. 14:11-17). Whereas Ezekiel used the image of a mysterious "Gog" from the land of "Magog," Nephi chose the image of a "great whore"—"the mother of abominations," "the mother of harlots"—to represent the same things that Ezekiel foretold. As Nephi described it, the Church will be found "upon all the face of the earth" (1 Ne. 14:12). The forces of evil will muster their resources "among all the nations of the Gentiles" in order to "fight against the Lamb of God" (1 Ne. 14:13). But "the power of the Lamb of God" will descend on the Saints throughout the world, and they will be "armed with righteousness and with the power of God in great glory" (1 Ne. 14:14). In his wrath, the Lord will punish the enemies of his people by subjecting them to "wars and rumors of wars among all the nations and kindreds of the earth" (1 Ne. 14:15; see also v. 16). Nephi's vision in 1 Nephi 14 is thus an additional witness for what Ezekiel foretold, but more importantly, it enables us to understand Ezekiel's message. Additional insight from modern revelation is provided in a passage in the Doctrine and Covenants describing the destruction of the wicked: "And the great and abominable church, which is the whore of all the earth, shall be cast down by devouring fire, according as it is spoken by the mouth of Ezekiel the prophet, who spoke of these things, which have not come to pass but surely must, as I live, for abominations shall not reign" (D&C 29:21). fn

 

Almost all Old Testament prophecy focuses on these latter-day events: the restoration of the house of Israel, the destruction of wickedness, the coming of the Lord, and the Millennium. It should not surprise us, then, if these are the very themes alluded to by Ezekiel in the important apocalyptic scene recorded in Ezekiel 38 and 39. The emphasis is on the efforts of the adversary to overcome the Saints, followed by his destruction and the end of his evil works when the Lord intervenes to save his people. Ezekiel's conclusion bears testimony to these truths: "Now will I bring again the captivity fn of Jacob, and have mercy on the whole house of Israel. . . . I have gathered them unto their own land, and have left none of them any more [in captivity]. Neither will I hide my face any more from them: for I have poured out my spirit upon the house of Israel, saith the Lord God" (Ezek. 39:25-29). fn

 

The Envisioned Temple and Its Surroundings (Ezek. 40-48)

 

The last nine chapters of the book of Ezekiel record another great apocalyptic vision. In it are depicted, among other things, a temple with its priesthood and sacrifices, the division of the land among the tribes, and the dimensions of the land and the city.

 

This vision, received in the twenty-fifth year of Ezekiel's exile, or 573 B.C., is like nothing else in the Old Testament. Its apocalyptic nature is evident. As we learn from the introductory verses, Ezekiel was transported "in the visions of God" from Babylonia to a "very high mountain" which overlooked Jerusalem and its temple to the south (Ezek. 40:2). There he was met by a man whose appearance was like bronze, fn who accompanied him and guided him through the vision. These elements of the revelation—transported in vision, placed on a very high mountain, nonexistent mountain north of the temple, strange angelic guide—are recognizable characteristics of apocalyptic literature. As discussed earlier, apocalyptic vision is characterized by the use of vivid symbolic scenes that can only be understood fully with the help of additional revealed information. It seems that much more needs to be made known concerning this vision before all of its symbols can be understood. Still, its general message of a renewed house of Israel in a renewed promised land is clear.

 

In the vision, Ezekiel's guide gave the prophet a detailed tour of a temple in Jerusalem, including all its surrounding structures. The guide carried with him a measuring stick with which precise measurements were provided throughout the vision (cf. Rev. 21:9-10, 15-17). fn The first part of the temple complex observed and measured was the area from the east gate to the outer court. After that, Ezekiel and his guide saw the outer court, the north and south gates, the gates to the inner court, rooms for the preparation of sacrifices, rooms for the priests, and the temple itself (Ezek. 40:5-42:20).

 

Ezekiel was next brought to the gate facing east, from which he saw the glory of God approaching the temple. With radiant light and the roar of rushing waters, the glory of the Lord entered through the gate where the prophet stood and filled the Lord's house with its splendor (Ezek. 43:1-5; 44:4). Almost two decades earlier Ezekiel had experienced a similar apocalyptic vision in which he saw God's glory depart (Ezek. 9:3; 10:18-19; 11:22-23). In that earlier vision an angelic guide showed him the temple in its time of wickedness (Ezek. 8-11). In graphic detail he saw symbolic figures and actions that represented its apostasy and the evil works that were done in it. Now, years later and after the destruction of the temple and the exile of the Jews, he saw in striking symbols a vision of the temple in a purified state. Whereas Ezekiel's first temple vision represented all that was corrupt and degenerate about Israel's relationship with God, his later visionary temple represents all that will be holy and glorious about that relationship when the house of Israel is purified.

 

The next stop in Ezekiel's visionary tour was at the altar, where he was given instructions for the direction of the priests in their sacrifices (Ezek. 43:13-27). In chapter 44 he learned of the roles of the priests and the Levites in the temple. Of these, only the "sons of Zadok" would be allowed to enter the sanctuary (Ezek. 44:15-16). fn Through their actions and their appearance, they would teach the Lord's people the difference between the "holy" and the "profane" and "the unclean and the clean" (Ezek. 44:23). Ezekiel was shown the division of the land and the sacred precinct that would result from it. The priests and the Levites would each receive an inheritance 25,000 cubits long and 10,000 cubits wide. The sanctuary would be located in the priests' portion. The property of the city, which would belong to the whole house of Israel, would be 25,000 cubits by, 5,000 cubits. Adjacent to these portions would be the property of the prince (Ezek. 45:1-12). fn Ezekiel found out more about these special allotments at a later stage in his vision (Ezek. 48:8-22).

 

Ezekiel next learned, in some detail, of the offerings and holy days that would be observed in the temple. Everything was to be administered according to a prescribed plan (Ezek. 45:13-46:23).

 

A new scene of the vision opened as Ezekiel's guide took him to the entrance of the temple, from which he saw water flowing from under the threshold toward the east. He and his guide followed the flow of water and measured its depth along the way. A thousand cubits from the source it was ankle deep. A thousand cubits farther it was knee deep. After another thousand it was up to his waist, and after another it was a river, deep enough to swim in (Ezek. 47:1-5). The water continued its flow to the Dead Sea, which became a freshwater lake on contact with the river from the temple. Ezekiel saw that swarms of living things would live wherever the river flowed, and varieties of fish would inhabit the lake which had once been hostile to life (Ezek. 47:6-10). Fruit trees of all kinds would adorn the banks of the river. "Their leaves will not wither, nor will their fruit fail. Every month they will bear, because the water from the sanctuary flows to them. Their fruit will serve for food and their leaves for healing" (Ezek. 47:12, NIV fn).

 

The next part of Ezekiel's vision focuses on the division of the land among the tribes (Ezek. 47:13-48:29). All thirteen of the tribes are mentioned, and each would receive an inheritance. fn The list includes Levi, which in Old Testament times did not receive a tribal allotment but was settled in special cities throughout the territories of the other tribes. Even non-Israelites would receive an inheritance. Those who would dwell among the children of Israel would be considered as native-born Israelites and would receive an inheritance among them (Ezek. 47:21-23).

 

In the last segment of the vision, Ezekiel learned the names of the gates of the holy city. On each of the four sides of the city—which would be 4,500 cubits square—there would be three gates, each one named for one of the tribes (Ezek. 48:30-34). In this case Ephraim and Manasseh are not mentioned, but one gate is named Joseph and one is named Levi.

 

A Millennial Temple in Jerusalem

 

It appears that Ezekiel's vision represents the millennial condition of the house of Israel, in which they will enjoy the blessings of their promised land, their holy city, and their temple. The centerpiece of the vision is a house of God that will be built at some future time. Some have suggested that Ezekiel foresaw Jews in Palestine building a temple independently of the Church and without a knowledge of the gospel of Jesus Christ. If they did, it would not be in fulfillment of divine prophecy (Ezekiel's or anyone else's), for the Lord's house is a house of order, and the keys of temple building are found only in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (D&C 110:13-16). fn If there is to be a true temple built by members of the house of Judah someday, it will not be a temple of Judaism but of Mormonism, built by Jewish Latter-day Saints to the glory of their Savior, Jesus Christ. fn

 

As in other apocalyptic visions, the symbols often are not meant to portray literally the events, people, or things, but to characterize or idealize them. It seems that such is the case with this vision. It depicts the future glories of Israel's restoration in the most idealized images. Everything about the millennial day—including the land, the city, and the temple—would exceed by far the best of what had existed in earlier times. But the vision was limited by the level of doctrinal understanding of its readers, who were still under the Law of Moses without a comprehension of the gospel of Christ and still rejected the words of living prophets, as is so evident in the book of Ezekiel. Thus the vision showed a temple of the Law of Moses, patterned after the temples of ancient Israel. Officiating in it was the Aaronic priesthood, as in biblical times (Ezek. 43:13-27; 44:10-31), and burnt offerings, sin offerings, and fellowship ("peace") offerings are depicted (Ezek. 43:18-27). fn

 

But the scriptures make it clear that the Law of Moses and its sacrifices by the shedding of blood were ended with the atonement of Christ (Alma 34:13-14; Heb. 10:18). Given this fact, it seems unlikely that a temple for the performance of Mosaic animal offerings will ever again be built, especially during the Millennium, when there will be no death. Future temples, both before and after the Second Coming, will presumably be similar to those with which we are familiar in the Church now, in which ordinances of the Melchizedek Priesthood will be performed for the living and the dead. Joseph Smith taught that to make the Restoration complete, "all things had under the Authority of the Priesthood at any former period shall be had again." He included the restoration of sacrifice in his discussion, though not of those sacrifices that were revealed with the Law of Moses. fn Given the clear message from the scriptures that animal sacrifice ended with Christ (Alma 34:13-14), perhaps we can view the sacrifice of which the Prophet spoke as a short-term or one-time event in fulfillment of Malachi 3:3 and 4, to signal that the Levites are again in the covenant and have assumed their rightful priesthood function in the house of Israel. fn

 

Ezekiel's vision portrayed the future temple by means of familiar Old Testament temple images because his readers would not have recognized or comprehended a temple like ours today. The Lord communicates with people in their own language and according to their level of understanding (D&C 1:24). In this vision he taught ancient Jews transcendent millennial things by using images drawn from their own time and experience. The design, purpose, and ordinances of modern temples would have made no sense to them (just as they make no sense to Jews and other Christians today). The real millennial temple will be much different from its visionary symbol—more glorious and with a more profound purpose. In it, worthy Saints will enter into covenants and participate in sacred ordinances—all designed to help them prepare to enter the presence of God in the highest degree of glory.

 

Who will build this temple? When? And where will it stand? Because Ezekiel's immediate ministry was to Jews recently exiled from their homeland, who had experienced the destruction of their kingdom, their city, and their temple, it is likely that the scene he witnessed has its focus in the restoration of Judah and Jerusalem. As other passages of scripture teach, a temple will yet be built in that city. Whether or not it will stand on the same spot as the ancient temples is not important. What is important, however, is that one day the inhabitants of Jerusalem will again be worthy to have a house of God in their midst. Ezekiel's images suggest that it will be built in a day when Israel is gathered and its people sanctified—conditions which can only follow the time when they will lay aside the false religions and traditions of their ancestors and join the Church of Jesus Christ through baptismal covenants. It appears that for the people there in general, it will be only after the Second Coming that those conditions will exist. Those who will participate in its construction will be the Saints of God who will reside in that area—Jews who will have gathered again to the covenants, Arabs who will have likewise joined the Lord's Church, and others who will dwell among them.

 

"The Lord Is There"

 

Other symbols in Ezekiel's vision convey additional insights. The scene of the division of the land depicts the restoration of all the tribes of Israel to allotted territory in Palestine (Ezek. 47:13-48:29). Modern revelation explains, however, that whereas Judah will one day be restored in righteousness to the Holy Land, the descendants of Manasseh and Ephraim will receive their inheritance in the New World (see 3 Ne. 15:13; 16:16; 21:22; Ether 13:8). And it is not unlikely that diverse parts of the world will be provided as gathering places for others of the covenant people. Perhaps Ezekiel's symbolic division of the land represents a future presence for members of all the tribes in their ancestral homeland. Or perhaps it represents all the millennial gathering places worldwide in which faithful covenant people will dwell. In that millennial day when all the world is Zion, the location and extent of one's real estate is likely to be of minor interest. And perhaps prophecies of gathering to promised lands have more to do with gathering to covenants than with geographical matters.

 

The vision depicts a river of water flowing from beneath the temple and bringing life to everything it touches (Ezek. 47:1-12). Similar scenes are found in Joel 3:18, Zechariah 14:8, and Revelation 22:1. In the apocalyptic contexts of all three of three of these passages, the symbolic waters seem to convey the idea of truth, life, and healing emanating from the Lord's house to fill the world. "Whosoever drinketh of the water that I shall give him shall never thirst," Jesus said, "but the water that I shall give him shall be in him a well springing up into everlasting life" (John 4:14). In the Millennium, Isaiah wrote, "the earth shall be full of the knowledge of the Lord, as the waters cover the sea" (Isa. 11:9). Truth and eternal life will flow freely in that day, and a literal transformation of the planet will take place as well: the parched places will become green, the deserts will blossom as a rose (Isa. 35:1-7), and "the earth will be renewed and receive its paradisiacal glory" (A of F 10).

 

In Ezekiel's earlier vision he witnessed the glory of the Lord leaving the temple, which had become unworthy of the divine presence (Ezek. 10:18-19; 11:22-23). In this vision of millennial things he saw it return, this time to usher in a thousand years of Christ's reign (Ezek. 43:1-5; 44:4). Holiness and glory will be the watchwords in that day, for they will fill the earth and characterize all that is done in it. As Zechariah foretold, even the pots and pans and the bells on the horses will be inscribed with "Holiness unto the Lord" (Zech. 14:20-21), just as our temples are today. "For the Lord shall be in their midst, and his glory shall be upon them, and he will be their king and their lawgiver" (D&C 45:59). We look forward with anticipation to the glorious Millennium and hope to be worthy to be citizens of Zion then, when Christ's presence will sanctify the earth and those who will be privileged to dwell on it. That will be the day in which Jerusalem will at last become a Holy City—so appropriately renamed in Ezekiel's vision: "The Lord is there" (Ezek. 48:35).

 

Notes

 

Kent P. Jackson is professor of ancient scripture at Brigham Young University.

 

Footnotes

 

1. Interestingly, these are the very topics that Moroni taught to Joseph Smith when he appeared to him on 21-22 September 1823 to introduce him to his mission and that of the Church in the dispensation of the fulness of times. See Kent P. Jackson, "Moroni's Message to Joseph Smith," Ensign, Aug. 1990, pp. 13-16.

 

2. In practical terms, this means that if something seems to be foretold in an Old Testament prophecy that is nowhere to be found in modern revelation, one should withhold judgment on it, at the very least. More likely, the passage probably means something other than one supposes—something that is clearly revealed in modern revelation.

 

3. Current English-language translations render the word here in a variety of ways: "stick" (Jewish Publication Society Bible; Revised Standard Version), "stick of wood" (New International Version), "leaf of a wooden tablet" (New English Bible; Revised English Bible).

 

4. See Keith A. Meservy, "Ezekiel's Sticks and the Gathering of Israel," Ensign, Feb. 1987, pp. 4-13. Excellent photographs of a diptych can be seen in National Geographic, Dec. 1987, pp. 730-31.

 

5. Meservy's writing board interpretation, which he proposed originally in the 1970s (Ensign, Sept. 1977, pp. 22-27), is adopted in the footnote to Ezek. 37:16 in the LDS Bible.

 

6. Some others include Ezek. 2:9-3:4; 4:1-8, 9-17; 5:1-5, 12; 12:3-12, 17-19; 24:16-26.

 

7. The Lord told ancient Joseph that the great latter-day seer's ministry would include "convincing them of my word, which shall have already gone forth among them" (JST Gen. 50:30;2 Ne. 3:11). As the Lord revealed in 1820 when the Church was organized, one important purpose for the coming forth of the Book of Mormon was to bear testimony to the truth of the Bible (D&C 20:11; see also 1 Ne. 13:39-40). The coming together of the records of Joseph and Judah enables each to bear testimony to the message of the other and both together to bear testimony to the Lord and his work. In Nephi's words, "they both shall be established in one" (1 Ne. 13:41).

 

8. The mere availability of the two companion records does not necessarily mean that their union is complete. Elder Boyd K. Packer pointed out in 1982 that the newest editions of the scriptures are a part of the bringing together of the "sticks" foreseen by Ezekiel: "The stick or record of Judah—the Old Testament and the New Testament—and the stick or record of Ephraim—the Book of Mormon, which is another testament of Jesus Christ—are now woven together in such a way that as you pore over one you are drawn to the other; as you learn from one you are enlightened by the other. They are indeed one in our hands" (in Conference Report, Oct. 1982, p. 75; see also pp. 73-76).

 

9. For Joseph, see Ezek. 37:16, 19; Obad. 1:18; Zech. 10:6. For Ephraim, see Isa. 7:2, 5, 8, 9, 17; 11:13; 17:3; Jer. 7:15; 31:6, 9, 18, 20; Ezek. 37:16, 19; Hosea 4:17; 5:3, 11-14; 6:4, 10; 8:9, 11; 9:3; 10:6, 11; 11:3, 8, 9, 12; Zech. 9:10, 13. It is likely that several other more ambiguous references to Joseph and Ephraim also refer to the entire kingdom of Israel. See Zimmerli, p. 274.

 

10. See Kent P. Jackson, "The Abrahamic Covenant: A Blessing for All People," Ensign, Feb. 1990, pp. 50-53.

 

11. The terms "four quarters of the earth" and "north countries" both represent the various locations throughout the earth where the house of Israel was scattered. Since north was the direction to which the deportees of Israel and Judah were taken, their return is often described as being from the north.

 

12. Because definitions of apocalyptic literature vary, no universally accepted list exists. D. S. Russell includes only the book of Daniel from the Old Testament in his list of fully developed apocalyptic literature; see The Method and Message of Jewish Apocalyptic (Philadelphia: Westminster, 1976), pp. 36-39. He includes Ezek. 38-39, Zech., Joel 3, and Isa. 24-27 in a transitional category that later developed into full apocalyptic

 

13. Although they lack the bizarre imagery of the visions of Ezekiel and Daniel, Lehi's and Nephi's visions of the tree of life exhibit apocalyptic characteristics. In their visions, Lehi and later Nephi were transported into a world of symbols. It seems safe to suggest that the tree, the rod of iron, the great building, and other things they saw never actually existed except as symbols in the vision (see 1 Ne. 8-14). The apocalyptic nature of the latter part of the vision is even more apparent. See Stephen E. Robinson, "Early Christianity and 1 Nephi 13-14," in First Nephi, The Doctrinal Foundation, ed. M. S. Nyman and C. D. Tate (Provo, Utah: Religious Studies Center, Brigham Young University, 1988), pp. 177-91.

 

14. For example, the scenes depicted in the tree of life vision did not represent a specific event in the experience of Lehi's family but a lifelong process by which they chose to follow either God or the ways of the world.

 

15. As Nephi wrote, the Jews could understand the writings of their prophets because they were intimately familiar with these things (2 Ne. 25:5-6). See Kent P. Jackson, "Nephi and Isaiah," in Studies in Scripture, Volume Seven: 1 Nephi to Alma 29, ed. Kent P. Jackson (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1987), pp. 134-39.

 

16. An example of the latter is D&C 77, which interprets passages from John's revelation.

 

17. Discourse of 8 April 1843, recorded by William Clayton; Andrew F. Ehat and Lyndon W. Cook, eds., The Words of Joseph Smith (Provo, Utah: Religious Studies Center, Brigham Young University, 1980), p. 185; punctuation and spelling modernized. Also in Joseph Smith, Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, sel. Joseph Fielding Smith (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1938), p. 291.

 

18. Scholars generally see Ezek. 38-48 as not fully developed apocalyptic literature, which they feel is best manifested in documents from the second century B.C. Instead, Ezek. 38-48 is called "proto-Apocalyptic," or "the 'stuff' from which apocalyptic is made." See Russell, pp. 88-91.

 

19. The destruction of the wicked is depicted as a sacrificial feast also in Isa. 34:5-8 and Zeph. 1:7.

 

20. Spencer W. Kimball, The Teachings of Spencer W. Kimball, ed. Edward L. Kimball (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1984), pp. 439-40.

 

21. Footnotes at D&C 29:20-21 identify Ezek. 38-39 as the Ezekiel prophecy referred to in the D&C passage. Though the wording is not identical, the identification is most likely correct, as it is the closest thing in Ezekiel to the content of D&C 29:21. If this is the case, then Gog's battle against Israel is the same thing as the great whore's battle against the Saints in 1 Ne. 14.

 

22. The Hebrew that underlies the KJV phrase "bring again the captivity" means either "bring back from captivity" or "restore the fortunes."

 

23. John used the names "Gog" and "Magog" in his apocalyptic prophecy of the great battle at the end of the Millennium. In Rev. 20:7-10, "Gog and Magog" are used to personify those whom Satan will induce to rebel against God in his final effort to derail God's work. They attack Zion, but God intervenes with fire from heaven that devours them. Satan is then "cast into the lake of fire and brimstone" (cf.Jacob 5:76-77). These are typical apocalyptic images that reflect the vocabulary of Ezekiel's vision.

 

24. KJV "brass"; more accurately, bronze.

 

25. See Ezek. 40:5 and fn. 5c in the LDS Bible for an explanation of the "long cubits" used in this vision.

 

26. Zadok was the high priest during the reign of King David. The lineage of Israel's legitimate high priests descended from his line, through which John the Baptist came into the world.

 

27. For a drawing of these divisions, see Zimmerli, p. 535.

 

28. New International Version.

 

29. For a map, see Zimmerli, p. 537.

 

30. Elder Bruce R. McConkie taught: "There is only one place under the whole heavens where the keys of temple building are found. There is only one people who know how to build temples and what to do in them when they are completed. That people is the Latter-day Saints" Millennial Messiah (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1982), p. 279.

 

31. See ibid., pp. 279-80.

 

32. Of these, it appears that only burnt offerings predate the Law of Moses. Sin offerings and fellowship were part of the Mosaic system.

 

33. Ehat and Cook, p. 42; see also pp. 43-44.

 

34. See also Joseph Fielding Smith, Doctrines of Salvation, 3 vols., sel. Bruce R. McConkie (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1954-56), 3:93-94; Bruce R. McConkie, Mormon Doctrine, 2d ed. (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1966), p. 666; The Mortal Messiah, 4 vols. (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1979-81), 1:128.

 

 

(Kent P. Jackson, ed., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 4: 1 Kings to Malachi [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1993], 307.)

Here are some of Bruce’s writings on the temple Ezekiel saw in chapters 40-48.

Vision of the Restored Temple

Ezekiel’s vision of the corrupted temple was given in 592 B.C. The final Babylonian siege of Jerusalem began in January 588 B.C. In July of 587 B.C., the Babylonians broke through the walls and Jerusalem was destroyed. Those not killed were exiled to Babylon to share the fate of those banished earlier. To give hope to the beleaguered exiled, in April of 573 B.C., the Lord gave Ezekiel a vision of the future (chs. 33-48) including the restored temple (chs. 40-48).

“In the visions of God,” Ezekiel was brought “into the land of Israel”and was set “upon a very high mountain, by which was as the frame of a city on the south” (40:2). The city on the southern end of the mount was Jerusalem. Ancient Jerusalem was always located on the southern part of Mt. Moriah because that was where the water source was located. The Temple was built on top of the mount.

As Ezekiel was brought to the mount, he saw a man who glowed like brass with measuring instruments in his hand (40:3). The man was standing next to a large gate that led into a massive courtyard complex surrounding another gated wall. This wall enclosed a wonderfully constructed temple. It was the temple of the Lord restored. What followed was a vision of the restored temple.

Ezekiel was shown the temple in a unique way (chs. 40-42) [15]. His angelic ministrant guided him through the temple while measuring and detailing everything he showed him. The tour of the Temple revealed a perfectly symmetrical building complex. Surrounding the whole Temple complex was a perfectly square wall with three gates facing north, east, and south. Eight steps led up to each gate.

Ezekiel was taken through the east gate into a courtyard called “the outward court.” Within the outer court yard was another wall surrounding a second courtyard — called “the inner court” — with three gates facing directly towards the three gates of the outer courtyard. Like the outer gates, eight steps led up to each of the inner gates. The inner gates were perfectly aligned with the outer gates so that someone standing at the entrance of any outer gate could look directly into the center of the inner courtyard.

The ministrant took Ezekiel into the inner court, which was perfectly square. In its center — and visible from any gate — lay the altar of sacrifice (given a full description in ch. 43). Positioned on the edge of the west end of the inner court was the entrance of the sanctuary or temple proper. Entrance into the sanctuary was up a flight of ten steps.[16] The sanctuary consisted of three rooms: a porch or vestibule (Heb., ulam); the great hall (Heb., hekal), holy place, or temple in KJV; and the most holy place (Heb., debir). The entrance of each room was narrower than the room before, suggesting that each room became increasingly more holy.

After viewing the decorations and furnishings of the sanctuary, the ministrant brought Ezekiel again into the outer courtyard and measured the rooms of the priests. Once finished, Ezekiel and the ministrant left through the east gate and measured the outer wall of the temple complex. The ministrant “measured it by the four sides: it had a wall round about, five hundred reeds long, and five hundred broad, to make a separation between the sanctuary and the profane place” (42:20).

It is hard to interpret the meaning of the meticulous measuring of every aspect of the temple and its complex.[17] But what is sure is that the temple represented to Ezekiel the future restored temple of the restored kingdom of Israel. The picture produced by the painstaking measuring suggests that God’s plan for restoring Israel from her scattered condition has been carefully planned — nothing left to chance.

Ezekiel 43

Having viewed the temple, Ezekiel was brought to the east gate of the temple complex.  There he became a witness of a very important event. He saw “the glory of the God of Israel [come] from the way of the east” (vs. 2). As he had seen the glory of God depart from the temple because of the wickedness of the people (Ezek. 11), he now saw the glory of God return to the future temple.

Ezekiel was brought to the inner court of the temple complex, where he saw the glory of God return into the sanctuary and fill the whole temple (vss. 5-6). The symbolism is clear. With the temple restored in exactness, the glory of the Lord, which had been driven out because of wickedness, now returned because of gathered Israel’s exactness in keeping the commandments of God.

Ezekiel heard a voice commanding him to declare to the exiled Jews that the Lord would restore the Kingdom of Israel and his glory would return only when Israel put away the things of the world:

Son of man, the place of my throne, and the place of the soles of my feet, where I will dwell in the midst of the children of Israel for ever, and my holy name, shall the house of Israel no more defile, neither they, nor their kings, by their whoredom, nor by the carcases of their kings in their high places. In their setting of their threshold by my thresholds, and their post by my posts, and the wall between me and them, they have even defiled my holy name by their abominations that they have committed: wherefore I have consumed them in mine anger. Now let them put away their whoredom, and the carcases of their kings, far from me, and I will dwell in the midst of them for ever” (vss. 7-9).

Then Ezekiel was told to “shew the house [temple] to the house of Israel, that they may be ashamed of their iniquities: and let them measure the pattern” (vs 10). By measuring the pattern, the exiled Israelites would come to understand that the God of Israel should be worshiped in exactness. God is a god of order and must be worshiped in proper order (D&C 20:68; 28:13; 58:55; 107:84).

When the Lord would set his hand to restore the kingdom to Israel, they must perform every word of God with exactness. This is stated clearly in the next statement made to Ezekiel: “And if they be ashamed of all that they have done, shew them the form of the house, and the fashion thereof, and the goings out thereof, and the comings in thereof, and all the forms thereof, and all the ordinances thereof, and all the forms thereof, and all the laws thereof: and write it in their sight, that they may keep the whole form thereof, and all the ordinances thereof, and do them” (vs. 11).

After this, Ezekiel was given a detailed description of the altar of sacrifice, including the sacrifices to be performed thereon (vss. 13-25). Altars played a central role in ancient worship. After Adam and Eve were driven from the Garden of Eden, they built an altar and prayed to God. It was at an altar that they were taught faith in the Lord Jesus Christ (Moses 5:5-8).

Upon leaving the ark, Noah and his family built an altar and worshiped God (Gen. 8:20). When Abraham first entered the promised land, he built an altar and worshiped God (Gen. 12:7). Wherever he lived in the promised land, he built and altar in order to worship God (Gen. 12:8; 13:18; 22:9).

When the children of Israel were brought out of the land of Egypt, Moses built an altar at the base of Mt. Sinai, and there the children of Israel entered into a covenant with God to be “an holy nation” (Ex. 19:3-6; 24:4-8). When the children of Israel came into the promised land, they went to the first place where Abraham built an altar to the Lord and built their own altar and then entered into a covenant to serve the Lord (Deut. 27:1-8; Joshua 8:30-35). One of the first things Lehi did after leaving Jerusalem was to build an altar that he might worship God (1 Ne. 2:7).

In the Church today, altars also play an important role of our worship of God. The sacrament table is an altar in which all the sacrifices of the Mosaic law are symbolized in the ordinance of the sacrament. In the temples, altars are significant in covenant making and communication with God. [18]

Ezekiel was shown that exact process by which the altar of sacrifice was to be made ritually pure (vss. 18-26). If the procedure was followed, then the Lord would accept Israel (vs. 27). Symbolically this meant that if Israel worships the Lord with pure intent, then God would accept them as his people again.

Ezekiel 44

Ezekiel was then brought to “the gate of the outward sanctuary which looketh toward the east; and it was shut.” The Lord explained: “This gate shall be shut, it shall not be opened, and no man shall enter in by it; because the LORD, the God of Israel, hath entered in by it, therefore it shall be shut” (vss. 1-2). The closed gate symbolized “the sanctity of the precinct, particularly the central spine.” But it “also declares the permanence of [Jehovah’s] residence within the temple.”

Further, “the closed gate presents a veiled polemic against pagan notions. Among the many activities involved in the Babylonian New Year festival was the ritual ‘opening of the gate.’ The sacred gate apparently remained closed to all human traffic except on the great day of the festival when Marduk [a deity worshiped by the Babylonians] would exit and later return in procession through it. The closing of this gate declares on the on hand that [Jehovah] is not dependent on human arms for residence in the temple. No one, neither well-intentioned worshipers nor foreign conquerors like Nebuchadrezzar, may enter here. As the sovereign over Israel, and by extension over the earth, [Jehovah] opens gates that no one may close, and closes gates that no on may open. No enemy, either human or divine, will ever crash his sacred residence, remove him from his throne, and drag him off, according to the common treatment of the images of patron deities on conquered lands. [Jehovah] reigns supreme.” [19]

The rest of Ezekiel 44 deals with the regulations regarding proper worship. A few things should be noted in these regulations. First, Ezekiel was told, “Son of man, mark well, and behold with thine eyes, and hear with thine ears all that I say unto thee concerning all the ordinances of the house of the LORD, and all the laws thereof; and mark well the entering in of the house, with every going forth of the sanctuary” (vs. 5).

In other words, only those who are worthy may enter the Temple precinct. Unlike the past when foreign worship permeated the House of the Lord, the restored Temple would be free from the ways of the world. Therefore, “No stranger (Heb. foreigner], uncircumcised in heart [i.e., unconverted to the God of Israel], nor uncircumcised in flesh, shall enter into my sanctuary, of any stranger that is among the children of Israel” (vs. 9).

Second, Ezekiel was shown that one of the main duties of the priesthood was “to teach my people the difference between the holy and profane, and cause them to discern between the unclean and the clean” (vs. 23). The duty to teach between the ways of the world and the ways of God is illustrated in the modern Church through the “For the Strength of the Youth” pamphlet that should be followed by every member of the Church, not just the youth. In this wonderful pamphlet, the First Presidency, have made clear the difference between the sacred and the profane. Following the principles in this pamphlet will qualify one for entrance into the temples.

Ezekiel 47

This chapter is divided into two main sections: living waters flowing from the Temple (vss. 1-12) and the boundaries of the Land of Israel established (vss. 13-23). In first section, Ezekiel sees water flowing from underneath the temple down to the Dead Sea, east of Jerusalem. The Dead Sea is healed.

“The waters that flow from the temple have both literal and figurative meaning. The meaning is literal in the physical sense of the waters’ renewing and fructifying effects on the land. In the figurative sense they symbolize first the restoration of Israel as a land and a people, eventually including the entire earth. At the same time, they are figurative for the voice, presence, power, and pedagogy of Jehovah, which flows down from heaven as revelation to renew and sanctify man.” [20]

With the restoration of Israel to the land promised Abraham, comes the question of land division. According to this chapter, the land is divided fairly between the twelve tribes of Israel. In evaluating these verses (13-23), it is interesting to note that gentiles are also given an inheritance in the land. “So shall ye divide this land unto you according to the tribes of Israel. And it shall come to pass, that ye shall divide it by lot for an inheritance unto you, and to the strangers [Heb. foreigners] that sojourn among you, which shall beget children among you: and they shall be unto you as born in the country among the children of Israel; they shall have inheritance with you among the tribes of Israel” (vss. 21-22).

Recall that one of the promises of the Abrahamic covenant is that all nations of the world would be blessed with gospel opportunities. One of the purposes of the Lord scattering Israel among the nations of the world was so that the gentiles would be given opportunity to be gathered with Israel in the great gathering of the last days. This prophecy of Ezekiel suggests that there will be a number of gentiles who will gather with Israel.

Of this, President James E. Faust has said:

The Church is expanding at a tremendous rate. We now have stakes of Zion in a great many countries of the world, and most stakes have at least one patriarch. This growth permits many people across the earth the privilege of receiving patriarchal blessings. As President Joseph Fielding Smith stated, ‘The great majority of those who become members of the Church are literal descendants of Abraham through Ephraim, son of Joseph’ (Doctrines of Salvation, 3:246).

However, Manasseh, the other son of Joseph, as well as the other sons of Jacob, have many descendants in the Church. There may be some come into the Church in our day who are not of Jacob’s blood lineage. No one need assume that he or she will be denied any blessing by reason of not being of the blood lineage of Israel. The Lord told Abraham, “And I will bless them through thy name; for as many as receive this Gospel shall be called after thy name, and shall be accounted thy seed, and shall rise up and bless thee, as their father” (Abr. 2:10). Nephi tells us that “as many of the Gentiles as will repent are the covenant people of the Lord” (2 Ne. 30:2). Therefore it makes no difference if the blessings of the house of Israel come by lineage or by adoption. [21]

Conclusion

The purpose of Ezekiel’s ministry was to help the exiled Jews to receive a new heart, and thus qualify for the blessing of returning to the Land of Israel. Through the prophecies recorded in his book, it can be seen that the Lord both reprimanded Israel for their iniquities and promised them hope upon their repentance. Ezekiel 43-44, and 47 reveal that God has not forgotten scattered Israel but indeed has an exact plan for their recovery. They breathe into the soul of beleaguered Israel new life.

References:

1.        See Gospel Doctrine Lesson 43 in Meridian Magazine.

2.        C.U. Wolf, “Watchman,” in The Interpreter’s Dictionary of the Bible, 4 Vols. (Nashville, Tenn.: Abingdon, 1962), 4:806.

3.        Carely, The Book of the Prophet Ezekiel, p. 51.

4.        The Hebrew text of Ezekiel 8:3,5 is difficult lending itself to various possible translations. The text however seems to suggest that the altar and image of jealousy were located next to the northern city gate which would have been north of the northern gate of the inner court where Ezekiel was first set down. Among those who hold this view, see: S. Fish, Ezekiel (London: Soncino, 1985), p. 42; Carley, The Book of the Prophet Ezekiel, p. 52; Walther Zimmerli, Ezekiel 1 (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1979), p. 238. But others (such as Daniel I. Block, The Book of Ezekiel Chapters 1-24 [Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 1997], p. 280) see this gate as the northern gate of the inner court.

5.        Many have suggested that the image was the Canaanite fertility goddess, Asherah [see Carley, The Book of the Prophet Ezekiel, p. 53; Moshe Greenberg, Ezekiel 1-20 (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1983), p. 168; Fisch, Ezekiel, p. 42]. But Zimmerli does not think so (Ezekiel 1, pp. 238-239).

6.        High places with the images of pagan deities were often placed near the gates of cities (see 2 Kings 23:8) as can be seen, for example, at the Iron Age gates of Tel Dan [see Avraham Biran, “Dan,” in The New Encyclopedia of Archaeological Excavations in the Holy Land, 4 Vols. Ephraim Stern, ed. (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1993),1:323-332; also Avraham Biran, “Sacred Spaces of Standing Stones, High Places and Cult Objects at Tel Dan,” Biblical Archaeology Review, Sep/Oct 1998 (Vol. 24 No. 5), pp. 38-45, 70] and Bethsaida (et-Tel) [see Rami Arav, et al., “Bethsaida Rediscovered,” Biblical Archaeology Review, Jan/Feb 2000 (Vol. 26 No.1), pp. 45-56].

7.        This corroborates Jeremiah’s testimony wherein he said, “according to the number of the streets of Jerusalem have ye set up altars to that shameful thing” (Jer. 11:13).

8.        For an excellent discussion of the layout of Solomon’s temple including surrounding courts, see Victor V. Hurowitz, “Inside Solomon’s Temple,” Bible Review (April 1994), pp. 24-37, 50. For other discussions, see Roland de Vaux, Ancient Israel: Vol. 2 Religious Institutions (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1961), pp. 312-322; Menahem Haran, Temples and Temple Service in Ancient Israel (Winona Lake, Indiana: Eisenbrauns, 1985) pp. 189-194. Also helpful is Leslie C. Allen’s discussion of Ezekiel’s movements within the temple complex, including diagram, in Word Biblical Commentary: Ezekiel 1-19 (Dallas, TX: Word Books, 1994), pp. 139-141.

9.        There is scholarly debate the as to the exact nature of Tammuz (Dumuzi) worship. See, O.R. Gurney, “Tammuz Reconsidered: Some Recent Developments,” Journal of Semitic Studies 7 (1962), pp. 142-160; Thorkild Jacbosen, “Toward the Image of Tammuz,” in Toward the Image of Tammuz and Other Essays on Mesopotamian History and Culture, ed. W. L. Moran (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard, 1970), pp. 73-103); Samuel Noah Kramer, The Sacred Marriage Rite (Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press, 1969), pp. 107-133; Edwin M. Yamauchi, “Tammuz and the Bible,” Journal of Biblical Literature 84 (1965), pp. 283-290.

10.     Later rabbis considered the area between the altar and the porch of the temple one of the most sacred areas in the land. The Mishnah describes “ten degrees of holiness” beginning with the land of Israel and ending with the Holy of Holies, with each degree more holy than the next (see Kelim 1:6-9). In this list, only the holy place and the holy of holies within the temple itself were more holy than the space between the altar and the temple. According to the Mishnah, it was in this area that the priests blessed the people after performing the daily offering (see Tamid 7:2). This also was the place where the priests in the days of the Maccabees petitioned the Lord (1 Maccabees 7:36-38).

11.     The form shachah is found this verse is mishtachawithem, which is unusual. It appears to be a participle with a second masculine singlular perfect sufformative. Some scholars (such as Zimmerli, Ezekiel 1, pp. 221 and Block, The Book of Ezekiel: Chapters 1-24, p. 296, n. 70) assign this to scribal error feeling the word should be written mishtachawim, the normal rendering of worship. However, the Rabbis traditionally explained this unusual form as a compound of mashchithim (they destroy) and mishtachawim (they worship). They see in the word as it is presently rendered the dual nature of the abomination being acted out before the Lord: the worship of the sun god would bring about the destruction of the temple (see Fisch, Ezekiel, p. 45).

12.     Zimmerli, Ezekiel 1, pp. 243-244.

13.     The primary use of chamas in the Old Testament is in societal contexts: oppression, injustice, and false accusation based upon greed. But chamas can be taken to the point of physical violence and destruction. For a greater understanding of this word, see H. Haag, “Chamas,” in Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament. Presently 10 vols. Edited By G. Johannes Botterweck and Helmer Ringgren (Grand Rapids, Mich: Eerdmans, 1980), 4: 478-487.

14.     President Marion G. Romney taught that the light of Christ may be experienced in three phases: first, the light which enlighteneth every man that cometh into the world; second, the gift of the Holy Ghost; and third, is the second comforter obtained through the more sure word of prophecy when one’s calling and election is made sure (see “The Light of Christ,” Ensign [May 1977], pp. 43-45). In order to obtain the fulness of the light of Christ one must experience all three phases. These three phases are central to temple worship and are represented in modern temples through various stages of the endowment. These three phases can also be seen in the layout of Solomon’s temple. The first phase may be represented by the area outside of the temple including both outer and inner courts. The second phase may be represented by the holy place that housed, among other things, the seven branched candelabra. The third phase may be represented by the holy of holies with its ark of the covenant.

15.     For excellent discussion including excellent maps tracing Ezekiel and the ministrants movements through the Temple, see Daniel I. Block, The Book of Ezekiel: Chapters 25-48 (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1998), pp. 506ff.

16.     This is the reading of Septuagint.

17.     For summary of various interpretations, see John B. Taylor, Ezekiel: An Introduction and Commentary (Leicester, England: Inter-Varsity Press, 1969), pp. 251-254.

18.     For the sacrament table as an altar and the altars of the temples, see article on altars in Encyclopedia of Mormonism, vol. 1.

19.     Block, The Book of Ezekiel: Chapters 25-48, p. 614.

20.     Fred. E. Woods, “The Waters Which Make Glad the City of God: The Water Motif of Ezekiel 47:1-12,” in A Witness of Jesus Christ: The 1989 Sperry Symposium on the Old Testament (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1990), p. 282.

21.     James E. Faust, “Priesthood Blessings,” Ensign, Nov. 1995, p. 64.

 

 

Ezekiel 40-48

December 14, 2006

 

 

D&C 29 – Tells about the great and abominable church, this is the 1st apocalyptic revelation in our time.

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 29:8, 21)

 

8 Wherefore the decree hath gone forth from the Father that they shall be gathered in unto one place upon the face of this land, to prepare their hearts and be prepared in all things against the day when tribulation and desolation are sent forth upon the wicked.

 

21 And the great and abominable church, which is the whore of all the earth, shall be cast down by devouring fire, according as it is spoken by the mouth of Ezekiel the prophet, who spoke of these things, which have not come to pass but surely must, as I live, for abominations shall not reign.

 

 

Gather the people and prepare them against the tribulation which will come to the wicked.  Ezekiel saw the destruction of this wicked church by fire, ( 1 Nephi 14 & Ezekiel 38-39)

 

Ezekiel 38-39 set up chapters 40-48. 

 

Visions of Nephi

 

1 Nephi 13 – Restoration of the Gospel

 

1 Nephi 14 – Our day to the 2nd coming

 

(1 Nephi 14:9-13.)

 

9 And it came to pass that he said unto me: Look, and behold that great and abominable church, which is the mother of abominations, whose founder is the devil.

 

10 And he said unto me: Behold there are save two churches only; the one is the church of the Lamb of God, and the other is the church of the devil; wherefore, whoso belongeth not to the church of the Lamb of God belongeth to that great church, which is the mother of abominations; and she is the whore of all the earth.

 

11 And it came to pass that I looked and beheld the whore of all the earth, and she sat upon many waters; and she had dominion over all the earth, among all nations, kindreds, tongues, and people.

 

12 And it came to pass that I beheld the church of the Lamb of God, and its numbers were few, because of the wickedness and abominations of the whore who sat upon many waters; nevertheless, I beheld that the church of the Lamb, who were the saints of God, were also upon all the face of the earth; and their dominions upon the face of the earth were small, because of the wickedness of the great whore whom I saw.

 

13 And it came to pass that I beheld that the great mother of abominations did gather together multitudes upon the face of all the earth, among all the nations of the Gentiles, to fight against the Lamb of God.

 

 

2 Churches in the world – 1.  Love God and His work, symbolic of all people who love God

                                       2.  Love Satan, collection of evil in the world

Church of the devil is larger then the church of the Lamb.  Good is fighting against evil.

 

  (1 Nephi 14:14-22.)

 

14 And it came to pass that I, Nephi, beheld the power of the Lamb of God, that it descended upon the saints of the church of the Lamb, and upon the covenant people of the Lord, who were scattered upon all the face of the earth; and they were armed with righteousness and with the power of God in great glory.

 

15 And it came to pass that I beheld that the wrath of God was poured out upon that great and abominable church, insomuch that there were wars and rumors of wars among all the nations and kindreds of the earth.

 

16 And as there began to be wars and rumors of wars among all the nations which belonged to the mother of abominations, the angel spake unto me, saying: Behold, the wrath of God is upon the mother of harlots; and behold, thou seest all these things—

 

17 And when the day cometh that the wrath of God is poured out upon the mother of harlots, which is the great and abominable church of all the earth, whose founder is the devil, then, at that day, the work of the Father shall commence, in preparing the way for the fulfilling of his covenants, which he hath made to his people who are of the house of Israel.

 

18 And it came to pass that the angel spake unto me, saying: Look!

 

19 And I looked and beheld a man, and he was dressed in a white robe.

 

20 And the angel said unto me: Behold one of the twelve apostles of the Lamb.

 

21 Behold, he shall see and write the remainder of these things; yea, and also many things which have been.

 

22 And he shall also write concerning the end of the world.

 

 

The power of the Lamb of God is upon the saints of the church and upon the covenant people.  John writes what Nephi sees in the Book of Revelation.

 

(1 Nephi 22:11.) – Nephi talks about the last days and what will happen to the great and abominable church

 

11 Wherefore, the Lord God will proceed to make bare his arm in the eyes of all the nations, in bringing about his covenants and his gospel unto those who are of the house of Israel.

 

D&C 86:1 – Tares = Babylon, Gog and Magog and the Great and Abominable Church

 

Revelations Concerning Isaiah

(D&C 86 and 113)

 

KENT P. JACKSON

 

Many sections in the Doctrine and Covenants touch on Bible themes and expand both our understanding of the gospel as well as our understanding of important Bible passages. The words of the Lord, as spoken to Isaiah, the eighth-century B.C. prophet of Jerusalem, are reflected in several places in the Doctrine and Covenants. fn Some of the revelations to the Prophet Joseph Smith deal specifically with Isaianic prophecies. This study will deal with two such passages, D&C 86:8-11 and D&C 113, both of which shed considerable light on Isaiah and teach valuable gospel truths.

 

A Latter-day Mission

 

Section 86 of the Doctrine and Covenants is usually studied for its value in shedding light on Jesus' parable of the wheat and the tares (Matt. 13:24-30). fn A contribution of equal worth is the insight that it gives into Isaiah 49, one of the most significant revelations of the ancient prophet. Isaiah 49 is a prophecy which deals, among other things, with the role of Ephraim—and perhaps specifically Joseph Smith—in the latter days. Doctrine and Covenants 86 brings Isaiah's words into their Latter-day focus. Isaiah wrote: "Listen, O isles, unto me; and hearken, ye people, from far; The Lord hath called me from the womb; from the bowels of my mother hath he made mention of my name. And he hath made my mouth like a sharp sword; in the shadow of his hand hath he hid me, and made me a polished shaft; in his quiver hath he hid me; And said unto me, Thou art my servant, O Israel, in whom I will be glorified" (Isa. 49:1-3).

 

The speaker in this passage is called Israel, as is evident in v. 3, who explains his calling (v. 1) and certain manifestations of the divine favor that he has received (v. 2). The Lord called Israel "my servant . . . in whom I will be glorified." That this act of glorification would take place later than Isaiah's day is clear from his use of future tenses throughout the passage. The way in which Israel would glorify the Lord is specified in vv. 5-6.

 

Israel pointed out that his labors in the past had been in vain (v. 4). To this the Lord responded with a powerful prophecy of more significant labors that lay ahead: "And now, saith the Lord that formed me from the womb to be his servant, to bring Jacob again to him, Though Israel be not gathered, yet shall I be glorious in the eyes of the Lord, and my God shall be my strength. And he said, It is a light thing that thou shouldest be my servant to raise up the tribes of Jacob, and to restore the preserved of Israel: I will also give thee for a light to the Gentiles, that thou mayest be my salvation unto the end of the earth" (Isa. 49:5-6).

 

Israel's assigned task, as specified in the passage, can be divided into two parts, each one constituting a major mission to a group of God's children: (1) reestablish Israel and gather it again to the Lord, and (2) serve as "a light to the Gentiles," to make salvation available to them.

 

Joseph Smith and Ephraim

 

Section 86 of the Doctrine and Covenants was revealed to Joseph Smith in December of 1832, only two and one-half years after the organization of the Church. It is one of many revelations that grew out of the Prophet's study of the Bible. In the era in which these revelations were given, heaven-sent communications were unfolding the role that the young prophet and the young Church were to play in accomplishing the Lord's purposes. Perhaps Joseph had never considered the fact that he might have been mentioned in scripture by biblical prophets. Nonetheless he certainly knew by this time that the infant latter-day Church was the kingdom of God and that its continued success was sure. Doctrine and Covenants 86:8-11 made known yet other truths that brought greater emphasis to the mission of the Prophet and his work. Among other things, it brought to light the fact that Joseph Smith and his fellow workers of the lineage of ancient Joseph were the fulfillment of the great revelation recorded in Isaiah 49. It seems, in fact, reasonable to conclude that the "Israel" mentioned in Isaiah's prophecy refers to the specific tribe that was to preside in the last days—the tribe of Ephraim. At the head of that tribe—and presiding under the Lord's direction over latter-day Israel—stands the Prophet Joseph Smith. Isaiah 49 speaks of him and of the church that was restored through his service.

 

A few brief comments regarding some key phrases in Isaiah's words will enable us to understand the prophecy and its fulfillment.

 

"Called me from the womb" (v. 1): From the days of the Patriarchs, ancient Joseph and his descendants had been singled out to stand at the head of the house of Israel (see Gen. 37:5-11; 48:13-20; 49:26; Deut. 33:16-17). This was their foreordained calling. An important part of that calling included the challenge to be saviors of their brethren of Israel, just as their forefather Joseph had been a temporal savior in ancient times. Jeremiah prophesied concerning Ephraim's role in the latter-day gathering. As presiding tribe, it would be he who would announce to all that the time of the gathering and return had come (Jer. 31:6).

 

"In the shadow of his hand hath he hid me" (v. 2): At the same time that Joseph's father, Jacob, pronounced the blessing of presidency on Joseph and his posterity, he prophesied that the government would be in the hands of the tribe of Judah (Gen. 49:8-10). This was fulfilled in the kingship of David and his descendants, and it will be fulfilled to its fullest measure in the millennial kingship of the Lord Jesus Christ. The descendants of Joseph never ruled over the house of Israel, in spite of the fact that they inherited from their ancestor the keys of presidency. Moreover, we have no record that Ephraim ever had the blessings of the gospel from the time of its ancient apostasy to the time of the Restoration. Ephraim's presidency over Israel was to be realized in the last days. With the calling of Joseph Smith, a descendant of Ephraim, the tribe to which he belonged took its rightful position at the head of the family of Israel. Foreordained to a great latter-day service, Joseph's children—both of Ephraim and of Manasseh—have accepted their calling to bring the blessings of the gospel to their brethren.

 

"A polished shaft . . . in his quiver" (v. 2): Joseph Smith himself provided an interpretation that may show the fulfillment of this scripture: "I am like a huge, rough stone rolling down from a high mountain; and the only polishing I get is when some corner gets rubbed off by coming in contact with something else . . . all hell knocking off a corner here and a corner there. Thus I will become a smooth and polished shaft in the quiver of the Almighty." fn Thus Joseph Smith viewed himself as a polished shaft in the Lord's quiver, perhaps in direct fulfillment of Isaiah's words.

 

"To bring Jacob again to him" (v. 5), "to raise up the tribes of Jacob, and to restore the preserved of Israel" (v. 6): As has been discussed already, it was the commission of the birthright children of Joseph to bring about the gathering of Israel in the last days. Ephraim's leader, Joseph Smith, was the one to whom the keys of the gathering were restored (D&C 110:11), fn and it will be under the authority of those keys that the gathering will continue. Jeremiah explained that it would be "the watchmen upon the mount Ephraim" that would cry, "Arise ye, and let us go up to Zion unto the Lord our God" (Jer. 31:6). In modern revelation the Lord has affirmed that "they who are in the north countries" will return and receive their blessings under the hand of "the children of Ephraim" (D&C 133:26-34). Today it is, with extremely few exceptions, the children of Ephraim and his brother Manasseh—who constitute the Lord's Church—who are taking the gospel message to the scattered remnants of Israel and who thus are gathering their brethren.

 

"A light to the Gentiles" (v. 6): Nephi and others taught how the great blessings of the last days would be made available not only to the house of Israel, but to the Gentiles as well (see 1 Ne. 22:8-11). Indeed, the gospel is to be taken by Ephraim and his brethren in the dispensation of the fulness of times to all people (see JS-M 31; D&C 42:58). Once again, the tribe of Ephraim and Joseph Smith stand out as the main participants in this work. In the fullest sense, Jesus Christ is the "light"—not only to the Gentiles, but to all nations. The Church today has a commission to bear his message; thus it reflects his light.

 

"A Savior Unto My People"

 

Section 86 (vv. 8-11) clarifies Isaiah's prophecy and identifies Joseph Smith and his co-workers of the tribes of Joseph—the members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints—as the fulfillment of these words from Isaiah. These are they "with whom the priesthood hath continued through the lineage of [their] fathers—For [they] are lawful heirs, according to the flesh, and have been hid from the world with Christ in God" (D&C 86:8-9). Having been foreordained long ago to this calling, and having inherited it through lineal descent, Ephraim's children now are no longer "hid from the world" (D&C 86:9) "in the shadow of [the Lord's] hand" but are at the forefront of the Lord's work in the last days: to restore scattered Israel to the covenant blessings, and to bring the message of the gospel to the Gentiles. The Lord concluded his revelation to Joseph and the Church: "Therefore, blessed are ye if ye continue in my goodness, a light unto the Gentiles, and through this priesthood, a savior unto my people Israel" (D&C 86:11).

 

 

(Robert L. Millet and Kent P. Jackson, eds., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 1: The Doctrine and Covenants [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1989], 326.)

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 88:87.) – Natural disasters happen, the gospel will go to all the world

 

87 For not many days hence and the earth shall tremble and reel to and fro as a drunken man; and the sun shall hide his face, and shall refuse to give light; and the moon shall be bathed in blood; and the stars shall become exceedingly angry, and shall cast themselves down as a fig that falleth from off a fig-tree.

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 88:92-94.) – 2nd Coming and the destruction of the wicked

 

92 And angels shall fly through the midst of heaven, crying with a loud voice, sounding the trump of God, saying: Prepare ye, prepare ye, O inhabitants of the earth; for the judgment of our God is come. Behold, and lo, the Bridegroom cometh; go ye out to meet him.

 

93 And immediately there shall appear a great sign in heaven, and all people shall see it together.

 

94 And another angel shall sound his trump, saying: That great church, the mother of abominations, that made all nations drink of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, that persecuteth the saints of God, that shed their blood—she who sitteth upon many waters, and upon the islands of the sea—behold, she is the tares of the earth; she is bound in bundles; her bands are made strong, no man can loose them; therefore, she is ready to be burned. And he shall sound his trump both long and loud, and all nations shall hear it.

 

D&C 38-39 – More wickedness in the nations of the earth.

 

Ezekiel 38-39-40– These are figurative writings, yet wickedness will be completely destroyed at the 2nd Coming.

 

A New Temple

 

See Ezekiel 40 through 44 for partial blueprints and description of services in the temple.

 

"I am returned to Jerusalem with mercies: my house shall be built in it, saith the Lord of hosts" (Zech. 1:16).

 

"Thus speaketh the Lord of hosts, saying, Behold the man whose name is The BRANCH; and he shall grow up out of his place, and he shall build the temple of the Lord" (Zech. 6:12-15).

 

"For it is ordained that in Zion, and in her stakes, and in Jerusalem, those places which I have appointed for refuge, shall be the places for your baptisms for your dead. And again, verily I say unto you, how shall your washings be acceptable unto me, except ye perform them in a house which you have built to my name?" (D&C 124:36-37).

 

"What was the object of gathering the Jews, or the people of God in any age of the world? The main object was to build unto the Lord a house whereby He could reveal unto His people the ordinances of His house and the glories of His kingdom, and teach the people the way of salvation; for there are certain ordinances and principles that, when they are taught and practiced, must be done in a place or house built for that purpose" (Smith, History of the Church, 5:423).

 

"I remember, some time ago, having a conversation with Baron Rothschild, a Jew. I was showing him the temple here [Salt Lake City], and said he,—'Elder Taylor, what do you mean by this temple? What is the object of it? Why are you building it?' Said I 'Your fathers had among them prophets, who revealed to them the mind and will of God; we have among us prophets who reveal to us the mind and will of God, as they did. One of your prophets said—'The Lord whom ye seek shall suddenly come to his temple; but who may abide the day of his coming? . . . ' 'Now . . . will you point me out a place on the face of the earth where God has a Temple?' Said he, 'I do not know of any. . . . Do you consider that this is that temple?' 'No, sir, it is not.' 'Well, what is this temple for?' Said I, 'The Lord has told us to build this temple so that we may administer therein baptisms for our dead . . . 8and also to perform some of the sacred matrimonial alliances and covenants that we believe in, that are rejected by the world generally, but which are among the purest, most exalting and ennobling principles that God ever revealed to man.' 'Well, then this is not our temple?' 'No, but . . . you will build a Temple, for the Lord has shown us, among other things, that you Jews have quite a role to perform in the latter days, and that all the things spoken by your old prophets will be fulfilled, that you will be gathered to old Jerusalem, and that you will build a temple there; and when you build that temple, and the time has arrived, "the Lord whom you seek will suddenly come to his temple"'" (John Taylor, in Journal of Discourses, 18:199-200).

 

Nations Battle against the Jews

 

See Ezekiel 38-39. Though called by Ezekiel the battle of Gog and Magog, the usual title for this conflict is the battle of Armageddon. This name originated with the site of Har Megiddo, the mount or tel of Megiddo, a fortress city at the western end of the Jezreel Valley where many famous battles were fought in antiquity and which gives its name to the future battle to end this world's history.

 

"I will also gather all nations, and will bring them down into the valley of Jehoshaphat, and will plead with them there for my people and for my heritage Israel, whom they have scattered among the nations, and parted my land. . . . Multitudes, multitudes in the valley of decision: for the day of the Lord is near in the valley of decision" (Joel 3:2, 14).

 

"In that day shall there be a great mourning in Jerusalem, as the mourning of Hadadrimmon in the valley of Megiddon" (Zech. 12:11).

 

"For I will gather all nations against Jerusalem to battle; and the city shall be taken, and the houses rifled, and the women ravished; and half of the city shall go forth into captivity, and the residue of the people shall not be cut off from the city.

 

"Then shall the Lord go forth, and fight against those nations, as when he fought in the day of battle.

 

"And his feet shall stand in that day upon the mount of Olives, which is before Jerusalem on the east, and the mount of Olives shall cleave in the midst thereof toward the east and toward the west, and there shall be a very great valley; and half of the mountain shall remove toward the north, and half of it toward the south.

 

"And ye shall flee to the valley of the mountains; for the valley of the mountains shall reach unto Azal: yea, ye shall flee, like as ye fled from before the earthquake in the days of Uzziah king of Judah: and the Lord my God shall come, and all the saints with thee. . . .

 

"And this shall be the plague wherewith the Lord will smite all the people that have fought against Jerusalem; Their flesh shall consume away while they stand upon their feet, and their eyes shall consume away in their holes, and their tongue shall consume away in their mouth. . . .

 

"And Judah also shall fight at Jerusalem; and the wealth of all the heathen round about shall be gathered together, gold, and silver, and apparel, in great abundance" (Zech. 14:2-14).

 

"And he gathered them together into a place called in the Hebrew tongue Armageddon" (Rev. 16:16).

 

"For then, in those days, shall be great tribulation on the Jews, and upon the inhabitants of Jerusalem, such as was not before sent upon Israel, of God, since the beginning of their kingdom until this time; no, nor ever shall be sent again upon Israel. All things which have befallen them are only the beginning of the sorrows which shall come upon them. And except those days should be shortened, there should none of their flesh be saved; but for the elect's sake, according to the covenant, those days shall be shortened. Behold, these things I have spoken unto you concerning the Jews" (JS-M 1:18-21).

 

"He will gather up millions upon millions of people into the valleys around about Jerusalem in order to destroy the Jews after they have gathered. How will the Devil do this? He will perform miracles to do it. The Bible says the kings of the earth and the great ones will be deceived by these false miracles. . . . What will they do? Gather them up to battle unto the great day of God Almighty. Where? Into the valley of Armageddon" (Orson Pratt, in Journal of Discourses, 7:188-89).

 

The Causes and Description of Armageddon

 

"Armageddon is a holy war. In it men will blaspheme God. They will be in rebellion against Jehovah. The armies that face each other will have opposing philosophies of life. It will be religious instincts that cause them to assemble to the battle." (McConkie, Millennial Messiah, 398).

 

"There will be political overtones, of course. Wars are fought by nations, which are political entities. But the underlying causes and the moving power in the hearts of men will be their views of religious issues" (McConkie, Millennial Messiah, 478).

 

"Armageddon is the hill of the valley of Megiddo west of Jordan on the plain Jezreel. And Armageddon is the place where the final war will be fought, meaning, as we suppose, that it will be the focal point of a worldwide conflict, and also that as a place of ancient warfare, it will be a symbol of the conflict that will be raging in many nations and on many battlefronts. . . .

 

" . . . All nations are at war; some are attacking Jerusalem and others are defending the once holy city. She is the political prize. Three world religions claim her—Christianity, Islam, and Judaism. Emotion and fanaticism run high. . . .

 

"'And it shall come to pass, that in all the land, saith the Lord, two parts therein shall be cut off and die; but the third shall be left therein.' This is Israel of whom he speaks. These are the armies who are defending Jerusalem and whose cause, in the eternal sense, is just. Two-thirds of them shall die.

 

"'And I will bring the third part through the fire, and will refine them as silver is refined, and will try them as gold is tried: they shall call on my name, and I will hear them: I will say, it is my people: and they shall say, the Lord is my God.' (Zech. 13:8-9.) We repeat: It is a religious war. The forces of antichrist are seeking to destroy freedom and liberty and right; they seek to deny men the right to worship the Lord; they are the enemies of God. The one-third who remain in the land of Israel are the Lord's people" (McConkie, Millennial Messiah, 464-66).

 

"'And again shall the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet be fulfilled.' That which once happened to Jerusalem and its inhabitants shall happen again. . . .

 

"'And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh . . .'

 

"'Then let them which are in Judah flee to the mountains; and let them that are in the midst of it depart out; and let not them that are in the countries enter thereinto.' Is this the way the saints shall be saved in the last days when two-thirds of the inhabitants shall be cut off and die and only one-third be left: If more than a million were put to the sword in A.D. 70, how great shall be the slaughter when atomic bombs are used?" (McConkie, Millennial Messiah, 473).

 

"The kings of the earth and of the whole world will gather to fight the battle of that great day of God Almighty. Their command center will be at Armageddon, overlooking the valley of Megiddo. All nations will be gathered against Jerusalem. Two hundred thousand thousand warriors and more—two hundred million men of arms and more—shall come forth to conquer or die on the plains of Esdraelon and in all the nations of the earth.

 

" . . . This war will be a religious war. . . .

 

" . . . We do not speculate as to what nations are involved in these wars. It is well known that the United States and Great Britain and the Anglo-Saxon peoples have traditionally been linked together in causes designed to promote freedom and guarantee the rights of man. It is also well known that there are other nations, ruled by a godless communistic power, that have traditionally fought to enslave rather than to free men. It is fruitless to try and name nations and set forth alliances that are to be" (McConkie, Millennial Messiah, 476-77).

 

 

(David B. Galbraith, D. Kelly Ogden, and Andrew C. Skinner, Jerusalem: The Eternal City [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1996], 527.)

 

Visions of Ezekiel:

 

    1. Jerusalem destroyed
    2. Israel’s restoration
    3. Wickedness is gone from the earth
    4. What Jerusalem will be like in a world without sin

 

Ezekiel is a priest in the temple, he is familiar with the workings of the temple in Jerusalem but is not familiar with God’s own temple, it is clean, pure and right.

 

He is taken away in a vision to a high mountain and sees everything pointing to the center of the temple, the Holy of Holies, he sees God and His ways.  Temples were not set up this way in the ancient world.  Symbolism is all over this.  God is at the center of His people.

 

Ezekiel 41-42 – Shows how everything is set up.  Chapter 42 shows perfect measurements for a square, that seperates the holy from evil (sacred from the profane of the world).  There is a clear distinction between holy and unholy.  The temple is clearly holy so God can return, remember earlier He left and went to the Mt. of Olives because of the unholiness inside the temple.

 

(Ezekiel 43:1-5.)

 

1 Afterward he brought me to the gate, even the gate that looketh toward the east:

 

2 And, behold, the glory of the God of Israel came from the way of the east: and his voice was like a noise of many waters: and the earth shined with his glory.

 

3 And it was according to the appearance of the vision which I saw, even according to the vision that I saw when I came to destroy the city: and the visions were like the vision that I saw by the river Chebar; and I fell upon my face.

 

4 And the glory of the LORD came into the house by the way of the gate whose prospect is toward the east.

 

5 So the spirit took me up, and brought me into the inner court; and, behold, the glory of the LORD filled the house.

 

 

God came into the house by the east gate, the glory of the Lord filled the house because the wickedness had been destroyed (Ezekiel 38-39).

 

(Ezekiel 43:7.) – Millennial time period, the temple is not to be defiled anymore.  Wicked have been consumed

 

7 ¶ And he said unto me, Son of man, the place of my throne, and the place of the soles of my feet, where I will dwell in the midst of the children of Israel for ever, and my holy name, shall the house of Israel no more defile, neither they, nor their kings, by their whoredom, nor by the carcases of their kings in their high places.

 

Ezekiel knows what is to come in the future but we must be undefiled in order to prepare for this.  The people who returned were disillusioned because they thought Ezekiel’s revelations were for them rather then the 2nd coming.  But they were not clean themselves when they returned.

 

Ezekiel 43 – The people need to start becoming more holy.  For us, Jackson Co. temple has not been built, so this applies to us also.  We must become undefiled ourselves.

 

Ezekiel 44-46 – Everything is being done correctly, priesthood is also done correctly.

 

 

(Ezekiel 47:1-12.)

 

1 Afterward he brought me again unto the door of the house; and, behold, waters issued out from under the threshold of the house eastward: for the forefront of the house stood toward the east, and the waters came down from under from the right side of the house, at the south side of the altar.

 

2 Then brought he me out of the way of the gate northward, and led me about the way without unto the utter gate by the way that looketh eastward; and, behold, there ran out waters on the right side.

 

3 And when the man that had the line in his hand went forth eastward, he measured a thousand cubits, and he brought me through the waters; the waters were to the ancles.

 

4 Again he measured a thousand, and brought me through the waters; the waters were to the knees. Again he measured a thousand, and brought me through; the waters were to the loins.

 

5 Afterward he measured a thousand; and it was a river that I could not pass over: for the waters were risen, waters to swim in, a river that could not be passed over.

 

6 ¶ And he said unto me, Son of man, hast thou seen this? Then he brought me, and caused me to return to the brink of the river.

 

7 Now when I had returned, behold, at the bank of the river were very many trees on the one side and on the other.

 

8 Then said he unto me, These waters issue out toward the east country, and go down into the desert, and go into the sea: which being brought forth into the sea, the waters shall be healed.

 

9 And it shall come to pass, that every thing that liveth, which moveth, whithersoever the rivers shall come, shall live: and there shall be a very great multitude of fish, because these waters shall come thither: for they shall be healed; and every thing shall live whither the river cometh.

 

10 And it shall come to pass, that the fishers shall stand upon it from En-gedi even unto En-eglaim; they shall be a place to spread forth nets; their fish shall be according to their kinds, as the fish of the great sea, exceeding many.

 

11 But the miry places thereof and the marishes thereof shall not be healed; they shall be given to salt.

 

12 And by the river upon the bank thereof, on this side and on that side, shall grow all trees for meat, whose leaf shall not fade, neither shall the fruit thereof be consumed: it shall bring forth new fruit according to his months, because their waters they issued out of the sanctuary: and the fruit thereof shall be for meat, and the leaf thereof for medicine.

 

 

The Waters Which Make Glad the City of God: The Water Motif of Ezekiel 47:1-12

 

Fred E. Woods, Brigham Young University

 

This paper focuses on the meaning of the water motif of Ezek. 47:1Ezekiel 47:1-12. I will begin by giving you my own translation of this passage. fn

 

"1. And he brought me to the entrance of the temple, and behold water went out from under the threshold of the temple eastward, for the front of the temple was facing eastward. And water descended underneath on the right side of the temple, south of the altar.

 

"2. And he brought me out through the north gate round the outside to the outside gate which faces east and the water trickled from the right side.

 

"3. And the man came out to the east with the measuring line in his hand and he measured a thousand cubits more and allowed me to pass through the water up to the ankles.

 

"4. And he measured a thousand cubits more and allowed me to pass through the water up to the knees. And he measured a thousand cubits more and he let me pass through water up to the loins.

 

"5. And he measured a thousand cubits more a river which I could no longer pass through, for the water had raised, water to swim in, and a river which could no longer be passed through.

 

"6. And he said to me: Have you seen, Son of man? fn And he brought me back to the bank of the river.

 

"7. When I came back, there were on the bank of the river many trees on each side.

 

"8. And he said to me: These waters go out to the eastern region and flow down into the Arabah and come to the sea, into the bitter, salty waters and the waters will become fresh.

 

"9. And it will be that all living creatures which swarm there where the streams reach will live. And the fish will be very numerous because these waters reach there, and they will be healed and where the river reaches, everything will live.

 

"10. And fishermen will stand by it; from En-gedi until En-eglaim nets will be spread out to dry. Of many kinds will its fish be, like the fish of the great sea, very numerous.

 

"11. But its swamps and its marshes will not be healed; they will be used for salt. fn

 

"12. And by the river upon its banks grow every kind of tree for food. And their leaves do not wither, nor does their fruit cease and it will bear new fruit according to its months because their water flows out of the temple and their fruit is used for food and their leaves for healing."

 

The waters that flow from the temple have both literal and figurative meaning. The meaning is literal in the physical sense of the waters' renewing and fructifying effects on the land. In the figurative sense they symbolize first the restoration of Israel as a land and a people, eventually including the entire earth. At the same time, they are figurative for the voice, presence, power, and pedagogy of Jehovah, which flows down from heaven as revelation to renew and sanctify man. Ezekiel uses the imagery of trees as a symbol of mankind. Just as the waters cause the trees to grow, so hearkening to the voice of Jehovah causes mankind to grow. Thus the relationship between God and man is symbolized by the water-tree motif.

 

Perhaps the Garden of Eden was the genesis of this motif. Just as those Edenic waters flowed through the Garden, so shall water flow from the temple to renew the earth to its paradisiacal state. At that millennial day Jehovah's voice will also flow to all mankind who will then say, "There is a river, the streams thereof shall make glad the city of God." (Ps. 46:4.)

 

Historical Geography of Dead Sea Region

 

It is important to describe the desolate region around the Dead Sea accurately to allow full appreciation of the miraculous fructifying and healing effects of the temple waters. The Dead Sea is located in an area known as the Arabah or the sea of Arabah. (Deut. 3:17; 4:49.) In Hebrew the word carabhah is used to describe a remote desert region. fn Certainly that word is an understatement when applied to the forbidding wasteland of the Arabah. The biblical geographer George Adam Smith writes: "Perhaps there is no region of our earth where Nature and History have more cruelly conspired, where so tragic a drama has obtained so awful a theatre." fn

 

This desolate area encompasses the deep depression of the Jordan Rift from the Sea of Galilee to the Gulf of Akabah. The Dead Sea lies not only at the lowest elevation of this great depression but also, in fact, at the lowest land area on the surface of the earth, dropping to 1,275 feet below sea level. fn About the Dead Sea itself, George Adam Smith commented, "The history of the Dead Sea opens with Sodom and Gomorrah, and may be said to close with the Massacre of Masada." fn

 

It is surprising to learn in Genesis 13:10 that this desolate land known as the Arabah was once a very fertile area. The verbal root of Arabah, c-r-b, can mean "to be sweet" or "pleasing." fn Genesis 13:10 indicates that it was pleasing to the eyes of Lot: "And Lot lifted up his eyes, and beheld all the plain of Jordan, that it was well watered every where, before the Lord destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah, even as the garden of the Lord." fn Yet the Lord sent fire and sulphur to utterly destroy Sodom and Gomorrah and its inhabitants (Gen. 19:24-25, 28.) as a punishment for their grievous sins. (Gen. 18:20; 19:13.) This desolate condition is not to remain. Ezekiel states, "And the desolate land will be tilled, whereas it lay desolate in the sight of all that passed by. And they shall say, This land that was desolate is become like the garden of Eden; and the waste and desolate and ruined cities are become fenced, and are inhabited." (Ezek. 36:34-35.) fn Hence, in the geographic history of the Dead Sea region it begins as a well-watered garden, is then destroyed by fire and sulphur as a consequence of sin, and will be restored to its Edenic state. The extent of Ezekiel's awareness of these things is revealed in that portion of his writing under investigation here.

 

Ezekiel's Understanding of Dead Sea Symbolism

 

Ezekiel, a priest (Ezek. 1:3), would have been familiar with passages from the Pentateuch concerning the consequences of sin against Jehovah that befall lands and peoples. One such passage explained the curses that would fall upon the Israelites as a consequence for breaching their covenants with the Lord: "And the Lord will not spare him, but then the anger of the Lord and his jealousy shall smoke against that man, and all the curses that are written in this book shall lie upon him, and the Lord shall blot out his name from under heaven." (Deut. 29:20.) It is likely that Ezekiel perceived the fate of Sodom and Gomorrah as a type for rebellious Israel. Another passage that reflects the geographic cursing of Israel as a result of broken covenants is found in Deuteronomy: "And that the whole land thereof is [sulphur], and salt, and burning, that it is not sown, nor beareth, nor any grass groweth therein, like the [destruction] of Sodom, and Gomorrah." (Deut. 29:23.)

 

Ezekiel was familiar with the figurative usage of Sodom and Gomorrah as symbols of both wickedness and desolation. The Lord compares the wickedness of Jerusalem to that of Sodom: "As I live, saith the Lord God, [your sister Sodom] hath not done, she nor her daughters, as thou hast done, thou and thy daughters." (Ezek. 16:48.) The Lord consequently declares to Jerusalem that "I will even deal with thee as thou hast done, which hast despised the oath in breaking the covenant." (Ezek. 16:59.) Yet he promises, "I will remember my covenant with thee in the days of thy youth, and I will establish unto thee an everlasting covenant." (Ezek. 16:60.) Among these covenants was the promise that the land that lay desolate would once again become like the Garden of Eden. (Ezek. 36:34-35.)

 

Ezekiel's priestly background and his writings speak of his knowledge of the literal and figurative nature of this desolate region. He understood that when his people kept the Lord's commandments the land would become fertile and the people would prosper. Ezekiel's prophecy using the water motif signals the commencement of the Edenic day of restoration.

 

The Garden of Eden

 

The etymology of the Hebrew word Eden is uncertain. It may be related to the Sumerian word edinu, which denotes either "wilderness" or "flatland." fn The Septuagint interpreted the word from the root of the Hebrew verb cdn, "to delight," and thus translated the "garden of Eden" as "the garden of delight." This interpretation was the basis for the traditional view of the Garden of Eden as paradise. fn

 

Eden is cited as a location or a condition fourteen times in the Old Testament. It is used six times both in Genesis and in Ezekiel and once each in Joel and Isaiah. fn Nicholas Wyatt notes that the references after the book of Genesis are given after the scattering of Israel, indicating that these prophets use Eden to suggest the notion of a return to a restored condition or an Edenic land. fn

 

Ezekiel uses the word Eden as many times as the book of Genesis does. This usage gives preliminary support to the proposal that the water motif of Ezekiel is based upon the Garden of Eden theme. That prototype reference in Genesis 2:8-10 states:

 

"And the Lord God planted a garden eastward in Eden; and there he put the man whom he had formed.

 

"And out of the ground made the Lord God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil.

 

"And a river went out of Eden to water the garden; and from thence it was parted, and became into four heads."

 

The source of this river may have been the underground waters known in biblical Hebrew as tehom, which is translated as the "deep." These waters symbolize both life-giving power and the chaotic waters of destruction that existed before the Creation. These waters are first mentioned in Genesis 1:2: "And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the [tehom]. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters." In his Near Eastern studies of temple typology, John Lundquist states that "the temple is often associated with the waters of life which flow from a spring within the building itself. . . . The reason such springs exist in temples is that they were perceived as the primeval waters of creation." fn

 

The waters that issue forth from the threshold of Ezekiel's temple appear to represent the waters of creation. Herbert May states, "Since it was not fed by tributaries, it must have been the deep [tehom] which was the source of the river of life which flowed from beneath the threshold of Ezekiel's temple." fn I suggest the tehom is not only the source for the river in the Garden of Eden but may also be the source of the waters that flow from Ezekiel's temple.

 

Figurative Meaning of Water in Ezekiel's Motif

 

Ezekiel 47:1 provides the basis for the figurative meaning of the temple waters: "Afterward he brought me again unto the door of the house; and behold, waters issued out from under the threshold of the house eastward." The Hebrew word translated "threshold" is miptan. It is mentioned eight times in the Old Testament. Five of the eight instances are in the book of Ezekiel. (See Ezek. 9:3; 10:4, 18; 46:2; Ezek. 47:147:1.) From Ezekiel 9:3 and 10:4 we learn that the glory of the Lord appeared first where the cherubim protected the ark of the covenant and then extended to the threshold of the temple. The miptan (threshold) is thus the place where the presence of Jehovah is first experienced by the person entering the temple. When Joseph Smith dedicated the first latter-day temple in Kirtland, he prayed to God that "all people who shall enter upon the threshold of the Lord's house may feel thy power." (D&C 109:13.)

 

The water that issues forth from Jehovah's presence thus represents the podium of his power, glory, and divine attributes, suggesting figurative implications for Ezekiel's water motif. Ezekiel 47:12 emphasizes that these waters have fructifying and special healing power because the "waters . . . issued out of the sanctuary." This water embodies Jehovah's power and his divine attributes because it flows from the podium of his power.

 

Several passages from the Old Testament support this concept. Among these is Jeremiah 2:13, wherein the Lord declares: "For my people have committed two evils; they have forsaken me the fountain of living waters, and hewed them out cisterns, broken cisterns, that can hold no water." A similar passage from Isaiah states, "Therefore with joy shall ye draw water out of the wells of salvation." (Isa. 12:3.) The psalmist adds in reference to the Lord, "with thee is the fountain of life." (Ps. 36:9.) These references illustrate a clear understanding and use of water by Old Testament prophets as a figurative symbol of Jehovah's power and presence.

 

Ezekiel also symbolically describes Jehovah's voice in terms of water. In his first vision he describes the voice of the Almighty as the sound of great waters. (Ezek. 1:24.) In his last vision he states that "his voice was like a noise of many waters." (Ezek. 43:2.) That is the same extended vision in which Ezekiel saw the waters flowing from the temple. Clearly the waters that flow from Jehovah's presence symbolize his voice and might. The psalmist writes this beautiful passage: "The voice of the Lord is upon the waters: the God of glory thundereth: the Lord is upon many waters. The voice of the Lord is powerful; the voice of the Lord is full of majesty." (Ps. 29:3-4.) As a whole these passages indicate that the waters that flow from Ezekiel's temple figuratively represent Jehovah and his various divine attributes.

 

Ezekiel's Use of the Edenic Garden and Trees

 

Ezekiel referred to Eden far more often than any other prophet. That in itself suggests that the Edenic theme influences much of his writing. In her dissertation entitled "Garden As a Symbol of Sacred Space," Susan Carol Walter Lau helps us understand Ezekiel's use of the garden and of the trees in Eden.

 

Ezekiel first uses the imagery of Eden in his prophecy of doom against Tyre and its king. (See Ezek. 28.) Lau proposes that Ezekiel uses the king of Tyre as a type of Adam. fn The king, like Adam, had been blessed to be living in a place that is likened to Eden. Ezekiel 28:13 states: "Thou hast been in Eden the garden of God." But like Adam, the king of Tyre was forced to withdraw from the garden as a consequence of sin: "Thou hast sinned: therefore I will cast thee as profane out of the mountain of God." (Ezek. 28:16; compare Gen. 3:17, 23.)

 

Interestingly, the sanctuary of Eden appears to be located in the holy mountain of God. Ezekiel 28:14 and 16 are the only verses in the entire Old Testament that allude to the Garden of Eden being on a holy mountain. Lau suggests that "this probably reflects some 'Zion theology' on Ezekiel's part, which seeks in some way to identify the original Garden with Mt. Zion in Jerusalem." fn In fact, Mircea Eliade views the Garden of Eden as the prototype of later temples in Israel as well as of other Near Eastern cultures. fn If we view the temple of Ezekiel with that concept in mind, we can see there is a correlation with water. Just as there was water flowing to the east to provide life for the Garden of Eden, so also waters flow to the east to re-create a garden of God. fn

 

The Water-Tree Motif

 

The second series of references to Eden in the book of Ezekiel appears four times in chapter 31. (See vv. 8-9, 16, 18.) Each time the trees of Eden are the salient feature, and in every case they symbolize kings and kingdoms. Ezekiel uses a great cedar in Lebanon as a symbol for Pharaoh and the kingdoms of Assyria and Egypt. It is revealing to compare Ezekiel's characterization of Pharaoh as a great tree with Daniel's figurative use of King Nebuchadnezzar as a mighty tree. (Dan. 4:10-26.) Each of these trees was the largest in its location, and both were brought down low. (Ezek. 31:10-13; Dan. 4:10-12, 23-25.) Ezekiel uses this same motif in describing the king of Tyre. (Ezek. 28.) In all three of these cases, the rulers were brought down because they were lifted up in the pride of their hearts. (Compare Ezek. 28:17; 31:10-11 with Dan. 4:22, 27.)

 

Ezekiel 31:4 notes that it was water that made these trees mighty. In specific reference to the kingdoms of Assyria and Egypt as well as to Pharaoh this verse states, "The waters made him great, the deep set him up on high with her rivers running round about his plants, and sent out her little rivers unto all the trees of the field." The trees that were lifted up did not understand the source of their greatness and so, eventually, they fell. Ezekiel's lesson is clear. The water represents the power of Jehovah. These foreign people would not acknowledge Jehovah as their creator and their sustainer of life. Therefore, once they accomplished his divine purpose, they were left to themselves and died.

 

Ezekiel also uses the water-tree motif to refer to Israel. In Ezekiel 15 Jerusalem and her inhabitants are referred to as a useless vine tree that will be burned. In Ezekiel 19:10 Israel is likened unto a vine that is "planted by the waters: she was fruitful and full of branches by reason of many waters." Ezekiel 19:11-12 instructs us that Israel too was lifted up in pride and is therefore cast down to the ground, where her fruit dried up. Ezekiel 19:13 states concerning Israel: "And now she is planted in the wilderness, in a dry and thirsty ground." The result is that there is "no strong rod to be a scepter to rule." (Ezek. 19:14.) Walter Zimmerli views this vine as the Davidic house, which has had its royal roots transplanted into a desolate garden through the exile. fn They, like the foreign kings and kingdoms, also forgot that it was the water (Jehovah) that made them fruitful.

 

In Ezekiel 17:22-24 we read of a high tree that is made low and also of a low tree that will be exalted. As in the case of Ezekiel 31:1-9, this tree seems to represent the kingdom of Israel.

 

Ezekiel continues his water-tree motif as a symbol of the relationship between God and man in Ezek. 47:1Ezekiel 47:1-12. There are numerous trees on both sides of the river of water: "And by the river upon its banks grow every kind of tree for food. And their leaves do not wither, nor does their fruit cease and it will bear new fruit according to its months because their water flows out of the temple and their fruit is used for food and their leaves for healing." (Ezek. 47:12.) The water spoken of here is both literal and figurative. The fruit trees, I suggest, are not only fruit trees but are a figure of righteous men who produce good works that will heal the nations. Speaking messianically, Isaiah uses this symbolism when he refers to men as potential "trees of righteousness." (Isa. 61:3.) fn

 

In the book of Revelation we see the same water-tree motif used by John the Revelator. John appears to have been highly influenced by Ezekiel's writings. fn The water motif of Ezekiel serves as a bridge between the waters of Eden and the pure river in the book of Revelation that restores again paradise. fn The influence of Ezekiel on John culminates in Revelation 22:1-3: "And he shewed me a pure river of water of life, clear as crystal, proceeding out of the throne of God and of the Lamb. In the midst of the street of it, and on either side of the river, was there the tree of life, which bare twelve manner of fruits, and yielded her fruit every month: and the leaves of the tree were for the healing of the nations. And there shall be no more curse: but the throne of God and of the Lamb shall be in it; and his servants shall serve him."

 

The similarity between John and Ezekiel is clear. In both Revelation and Ezekiel waters flow from the throne of God to create a river that causes trees to flourish. From these trees comes the healing of nations. I suggest that this healing of nations is accomplished by righteous men (represented by the trees) who share the knowledge of the gospel (in the Millennium) and thus plant anew the seedlings of potentially righteous men, bearers of good works. (See Jacob 5:74.) fn Joseph Fielding Smith stated, "The gospel will be taught far more intensely and with greater power during the millennium, until all the inhabitants of the earth shall embrace it." fn

 

The water-tree relationship may indeed have its origin in the Garden of Eden. George Widengren suggests there is a "connection between water and tree, between temple basin and sacred grove, which clearly reflects the Water of Life and Tree of Life in paradise [or Garden of Eden]." fn In Genesis 2:9 we learn that from the ground of the Garden of Eden "made the Lord God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil." fn It is imperative that we remember that the gardener who planted and watered these trees was, in fact, the Lord. He is the same gardener who, in a figurative sense, plants trees (men) besides Ezekiel's waters. These waters symbolize Jehovah and produce fruit (works) and leaves (power) to heal (save a nation), both physically and spiritually. The figurative message, then, is that Jehovah places man in a position to drink from his divine knowledge and thereby men can strengthen themselves and others.

 

The symbolic description of the relationship between God and man replete in Ezekiel's motif appears in various passages in the Old Testament. Jeremiah 17:7-8 reads, "Blessed is the man that trusteth in the Lord, and whose hope the Lord is. For he shall be as a tree planted by the waters, and that spreadeth out her roots by the river, and shall not see when heat cometh, but her leaf shall be green; and shall not be careful in the year of drought, neither shall cease from yielding fruit." The psalmist remarks concerning the man who does not walk in the ways of the ungodly, "And he shall be like a tree planted by the rivers of water, that bringeth forth his fruit in his season; his leaf also shall not wither; and whatever he doeth will prosper." (Ps. 1:3.) fn Psalms 92:12-13 states: "The righteous shall flourish like the palm tree: he shall grow like a cedar in Lebanon. Those that be planted in the house of the Lord shall flourish in the courts of our God." The psalmist also informs us that the house of the Lord had its beams laid in the waters of creation; so too, Ezekiel's temple. (Ps. 104:3; Ezek. 47:1Ezek. 47:1.) Perhaps Ezekiel, like Isaiah, looked forward to the day when men would turn again to the living water of Jehovah and become "trees of righteousness" (Isa. 61:3) and when "the trees of the field [would] clap their hands." (Isa. 55:12.)

 

Further Attestation of Israel's Restoration in Ezekiel

 

The consistent theme concerning the restoration of Israel as a land and as a people is richly demonstrated in the book of Ezekiel. The following selected passages serve to support this point. In relation to this restored condition the Lord declares the following:

 

"And I will make them and the places round about my hill a blessing; and I will cause the shower to come down in his season; there shall be showers of blessing. fn And the tree of the field shall yield her fruit, and the earth shall yield her increase, and they shall be safe in their land, and shall know that I am the Lord." (Ezek. 34:26-27.)

 

Note, too, Ezekiel 36:25, where the Lord states, "Then will I sprinkle clean water upon you, and ye shall be clean." The Lord then tells Israel that he will give her a new heart and spirit. (Ezek. 36:26-27.) Israel is told her trees will be multiplied and her cities will be rebuilt. (Ezek. 36:30, 33.) The people in her borders will say, "This land that was desolate is become like the garden of Eden." (Ezek. 36:35.)

 

In Ezekiel 37, Ezekiel is shown in vision a valley of dry bones. This vision implies a dual symbolism of the restoration of Israel and her inhabitants in both a temporal and spiritual way. In verse 12 the Lord says, "I will open your graves, and cause you to come up out of your graves, and bring you into the land of Israel." fn The last nine chapters of Ezekiel, 40-48, contain a vision focusing on the construction of a latter-day temple and the theme of restoration. fn

 

Comparative Passages to Ezekiel 47:1-12

 

Two other Old Testament authors refer to precisely the same event that Ezekiel describes in Ezekiel 47:1-12. Joel and Zechariah verify Ezekiel's theme and at the same time shed additional light on the motif. Joel 3:18 states, "And it shall come to pass in that day, that the mountains shall drop fn down new wine, and the hills shall flow with milk, and all the rivers of Judah shall flow with waters, and a fountain shall come forth of the house of the Lord, and shall water the valley of Shittim." fn Contrasting Ezekiel's motif with this verse, we learn that whereas Ezekiel speaks of but one large river, Joel notes that all the river beds in Judah will be full of water. The word for fountain here is cyan. The word denotes a fresh underground source, which may be related to the tehom, or deep. The book of Joel reflects the same theme as the book of Ezekiel concerning the restoration of Israel as a people and the renewing of the land. Joel 2:3 informs us that the land will become again like the "garden of Eden," but not before a traumatic desolation takes place. This desolation is described in Joel 1:9-12, 20, where the people are cut off from the temple, the land laid waste, and the rivers dried up. Yet we find in Joel 2:21-22 that the Lord tells Israel: "Fear not, O Land; be glad and rejoice: for the Lord will do great things. Be not afraid . . . for the pastures of the wilderness do spring, for the tree beareth her fruit, the fig tree and the vine do yield their strength." Joel 2:23 states, "Rejoice in the Lord your God: for he hath given you the former rain." fn This passage is equally convincing evidence that the land will be renewed and the people will be restored and come to a knowledge of the source of their fruitful condition.

 

The other passages that refer directly to Ezekiel's water motif are Zechariah 13:1 and 14:8. Zechariah 13:1 states: "In that day there shall be a fountain opened to the house of David and to the inhabitants of Jerusalem for sin and for uncleanness." The word here translated as "fountain" is maqor, which is a fountain or underwater spring; this word means the same thing as yan in Joel 3:18.

 

Zechariah 14:8 sheds additional light on the reference to fountain in Zechariah 13:1. The passage states, "And it shall be in that day, that living waters shall go out from Jerusalem; half of them toward the former sea, and half of them toward the hinder sea: in summer and in winter shall it be." fn The fountain seems to be caused by a great earthquake that takes place when the Lord stands upon the mount of Olives. (Zech. 14:4-5.) That this water is literal can be supported by the Prophet Joseph Smith's prophecy: "Judah must return, Jerusalem must be rebuilt, and the temple, and water come out from under the temple, and the waters of the Dead Sea be healed . . . before the Son of Man will make His appearance." fn This fountain beneath the temple will turn into a river flowing to the east and the west. (Zech. 14:1.) This reference illuminates Ezekiel 47:1-12. It seems that the river in Ezekiel's vision flows not only to the Dead Sea but also to the Mediterranean Sea. The extension of the waters of this river, which go beyond Israel's boundaries, and the additional directional flow may be interpreted here in a figurative sense to symbolize not only the restoration of all the land of Israel but the entire earth as well.

 

It is important to recognize that the word for "river" used in Ezekiel 47:4-12 is nahal. The word nahal is a key word in this chapter. In Ezekiel 47:13-14, 2-23 we learn that when the waters issued forth, the tribes of Israel as well as non-Israelite people receive an inheritance on the earth. The word for "inheritance" is nahalah. Both nahal and nahalah come from the Hebrew root n-h-l, meaning to "possess" or to "inherit." fn The author appears to be using a deliberate play on words. By this means he indicates that when the river comes forth, so will the fruitful inheritance. One scholar suggested, "The return of paradise, apparently at present limited to Palestine, is of its very nature a universal event embracing the whole world. So we may take it for granted without further demonstration that Palestine is a part that stands for the whole." fn The tenth article of faith states, "the earth will be renewed and receive its paradisiacal glory." Elder Bruce R. McConkie interpreted this phrase to mean that the earth "will return to the edenic terrestrial state which existed when the Lord God finished the creative enterprise." fn The earth will be transfigured to its Edenic state. (D&C 63:21.) Speaking of that edenic day, Isaiah 35:6-7 states, "In the wilderness shall waters break out, and streams in the desert. And the parched ground shall become a pool, and the thirsty land springs of water: in the habitation of dragons, where each lay, shall be grass with reeds and rushes."

 

Elder McConkie then adds: "We do not doubt that this is temporal, for the deserts of this old earth, in its fallen and barren state, shall become the gardens and flowering fields of the new earth in the millennial day. But it is also spiritual, for the latter-day revelations says: 'And in the barren deserts there shall come forth pools of living water; and the parched ground shall no longer be a thirsty land.' In that day all Israel shall drink from streams of living water, streams that flow direct from the great Fountain Head, streams filled with the words of eternal life of which men may drink and never thirst more." fn

 

In that day of transfiguration, the righteous will receive their inheritance upon the paradisiacal earth. (D&C 63:20.)

 

A universal renewal of the earth appears to have its origin in the waters of the Garden of Eden. In Genesis 2:10-14 we read of the river of Eden, which divided into four different rivers and flowed in four different directions. Lau explains that there have been many attempts to try to specify the literal historical and geographical designations of these four rivers with little success. fn She prefers to consider these rivers in a symbolic way. Lau states, "If we pursue this line of thinking, the rivers might be seen as representing the four directions of geographical space." fn With respect to these four rivers Gerhard von Rad suggests that "the number 'four' circumscribes the entire world." fn

 

Additional contextual evidence from Zechariah suggests that this universal application is plausible. Zechariah 14:8-9 informs us that "in that day, [when] living waters shall go out from Jerusalem. . . . the Lord shall be king over all the earth: in that day shall there be one Lord, and his name one." This passage lends credence to the idea of a universal renewal of the earth because the Lord is said to be reigning not just over the land of Israel but over the entire globe. Modern-day revelation also informs us that when Christ appears to usher in the Millennium, "he shall stand upon the mount of Olivet. . . . And he shall utter his voice . . . and his voice shall be heard among all people. And it shall be a voice as the voice of many waters." (D&C 133:20-22.) These references shed additional light on Ezekiel's water motif in helping us to understand that the restoration can be applied to the land and people of all the earth. In its renewed condition all the earth and its inhabitants are flooded with the knowledge of the Lord. In Jeremiah 31:34 the Lord declares that in the millennial day, "They shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest." Isaiah 11:9 states, "The earth shall be full of the knowledge of the Lord, as the waters cover the sea." Habakkuk 2:14 states, "For the earth shall be filled with the knowledge of the glory of the Lord, as the waters cover the sea." Joseph Smith commented on the kind of knowledge in the Millennium when he stated that the Lord would "turn to them a pure language, and the earth will be filled with sacred knowledge, as the waters cover the great deep." fn Joseph Fielding Smith stated, "If the knowledge of the Lord covers the earth as the waters do the sea, then it must be universally received." fn

 

Conclusion

 

The Garden of Eden served as the foundation for Ezekiel's water motif. The term "waters" has both a literal and a figurative use. The prophecies used here will find literal fulfillment as life-giving water, indeed, flows from Jehovah's temple in the last days. But there will also be a fulfillment of the symbolic aspect as Israel and then eventually all the earth and its inhabitants are renewed through the life-giving powers of their millennial King.

 

Specific examples of the relationship between God and man verified the proposal that the water motif of Ezekiel was both figurative and literal for the restoration of Israel. It further symbolized the renewal of the land. Thus, water represents the commencement of the millennial day when the earth will be full of the knowledge of the Lord. For the present, these living waters bear witness of their Creator, who is Jehovah, even the Lord Jesus Christ. As he told the woman of Samaria, "Whosoever drinketh of the water that I shall give him shall never thirst." (John 4:14.) At the Feast of Tabernacles the Lord also declared, "If any man thirst, let him come unto me and drink. He that believeth on me . . . out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water." (John 7:37-38.)

 

Jehovah promises yesterday, today, and forever that "I will pour water upon him that is thirsty, and floods upon the dry ground: I will pour my spirit upon thy seed, and my blessing upon thine offspring." (Isa. 44:3.) The invitation is clear: "Every one that thirsteth, come ye to the waters." (Isa. 55:1.) fn As we draw water from the Source of salvation, who is Christ, we will concur with the psalmist, who declared, "There is a river, the streams whereof . . . make glad the city of God." (Ps. 46:4.)

 

Footnotes

 

1. Except for Ezekiel 47:1-12, all other biblical references in this paper cite the King James Version unless otherwise indicated.

 

2. The Hebrew words translated "Son of man" are ben adam. This phrase is used to indicate one man or, collectively, all mankind. The phrase as used in Ezekiel 47:6 may indicate that the Lord is not talking only to Ezekiel but through Ezekiel to all the descendants of Father Adam. (See Even-Shoshan 1981:14.)

 

3. Eichrodt (1970:581) suggests that verse 11 is a gloss. He contends that this passage is used to justify the important industry of salt. May (1956:328) agrees that the scriptural passage is being used to justify exploiting the mineral salts of the Dead Sea. Zimmerli (1979: vol. 2:514) states, "The thoroughness of this transformation frightened a later writer who was aware of the possibility of the extraction of salt from the Dead Sea. So he added the observation that the swamps and pools of the sea . . . 'keep their salt water for the extraction of salt.' " Thus we have a unanimous agreement from these authors, and I also concede that verse 11 was an addition to the text.

 

4. William Reed, in Interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible, 5 vols. (Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1982), 1:828-29.

 

5. George Adam Smith, Historical Geography of the Holy Land (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1897), p. 499.

 

6. Yohanan Aharoni, The Land of the Bible: A Historical Geography, trans. A. F. Rainey (Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1979), p. 21.

 

7. Smith, Historical Geography, p. 499.

 

8. Brown, Driver, and Briggs, A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1951), p. 787, for discussion concerning this root.

 

9. The phrase "the garden of the Lord" implies that it is like the Garden of Eden. See Genesis 2:8, which states that the Lord planted a garden in Eden.

 

10. Isaiah 51:3 further clarifies this understanding: "For the Lord shall comfort Zion: he will comfort all her waste places; and he will make her wilderness like Eden, and her desert like the garden of the Lord; joy and gladness shall be found therein, thanksgiving, and the voice of melody."

 

11. Brevard S. Childs, "Eden, Garden of," in The Interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible, 2:22-23.

 

12. Ibid., 2:22.

 

13. Even-Shoshan, A New Concordance, p. 835.

 

14. Nicolas Wyatt, "Interpreting the Creation and Fall Story in Genesis 2-3," Zeitscrift fur die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 93 (1981): 13.

 

15. John M. Lundquist, The Temple in Antiquity, ed. Truman G. Madsen (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1984), p. 66.

 

16. Hebert G. May, "Some Cosmic Connotations of Mayim Rabbim, Many Waters," The Journal of Biblical Literature 74 (1955): 21. The Mishna (Parah III: 3) explains that the temple was built upon the tehom.

 

17. Susan C. W. Lau, "Garden As a Symbol of Sacred Space" (PhD. diss., University of Pittsburgh, 1981), pp. 200-201.

 

18. Ibid., p. 202.

 

19. Mircea Eliade, Patterns in Comparative Religion (New York: American Library, 1958), p. 282.

 

20. The association of these waters with the east may reflect messianic overtones.

 

21. Walter Zimmerli, Ezekiel: A Commentary on the Book of the Prophet Ezekiel, 2 vols. (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1979), 1:397-98.

 

22. Isaiah also used the image of the tree in a figurative sense when he spoke of the age of people in the Millennium. He prophesied that "the child shall die an hundred years old . . . for as the days of a tree are the days of my people." (Isa. 65:20, 2; see also D&C 101:30, which reiterates this same idea.

 

23. Out of sixty-five New Testament references from Ezekiel, forty-eight are mentioned in the book of Revelation. LaSor, Hubbard, and Bush, Old Testament Survey: The Message, Form, and Background of the Old Testament (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1985), p. 478.

 

24. Lau, "Garden," p. 207.

 

25. Righteous men are represented by the image of a tree in the following passages: in Zechariah 3 and 4 Joshua and Zerubbabel are likened unto two olive trees; in Revelation 11:3-4 two latter-day witnesses are likened unto olive trees; in D&C 77:15 these witnesses are identified as prophets sent to the Jewish nation in the day of restoration. Elder Bruce R. McConkie stated, "No doubt they will be members of the Council of the Twelve or of the First Presidency of the Church." (Doctrinal New Testament Commentary [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1973], 3:510.)

 

26. Joseph Fielding Smith, Doctrines of Salvation, comp. Bruce R. McConkie, 3 vols. (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1976), 3:64.

 

27. George Widengren, "Early Hebrew Myths and Their Interpretation," in Myth, Ritual and Kingship, ed. S. H. Hooke (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1953), p. 168.

 

28. For further understanding of the tree of knowledge and the tree of life, see Child's article, "Tree of Knowledge, Tree of Life" in Interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible, 4:695-97.

 

29. See also D&C 97:9, where this same motif is beautifully attested in modern-day revelation.

 

30. The Hebrew word translated "blessing" is berakah. The Hebrew word for a pool of water is berekah. Both of these nouns are derived from the same Hebrew verbal root b-r-k, meaning "to bless" or "to kneel." This usage implies a connection between water and blessing. See Brown, Driver, and Briggs, Hebrew and English Lexicon, pp. 138-40, for complete references to these words.

 

31. The word "grave" here may also denote exile. Some view this in connection with the resurrection from the grave. Other scholars reject this notion and consider it a later addition. (May 1956:269.) I interpret this passage as both a literal and a spiritual restoration of the land and people of Israel.

 

32. The restoration theme of the land of Israel and her people is frequently attested in the book of Isaiah. (See, for example, Isa. 27:3; 30:25, 28; 35:6-7; 41:18.)

 

33. The Hebrew verbal root meaning to drop or drip is n-t-p. It is often used in a figurative sense to denote prophetic discourse or divine tutelage. See, for example, Amos 7:16 and especially Ezekiel 21:2. I suggest that Joel 3:18 implies this symbolic concept of divine instruction.

 

34. The milk that flows from the hills is not meant to be taken literally. It is probably a figurative reflection of Exodus 3:8, which refers to Israel as a land flowing with milk and honey. The wine dropping on the hills is probably also figurative. Both the elements of milk and wine are used as hyperbole to reflect the fertility of the land of Israel.

 

35. The Hebrew word for "former rain" is moreh, which is also the same word for "teacher." The verbal root of this noun is y-r-h, meaning to throw or shoot. In the 3.m.s. hiphil form yoreh, it means to give instruction or to give drink. (See, for example, Hosea 6:3; 10:12.) The noun torah is also constructed from this same root. (See Brown, Driver, and Briggs, Hebrew and English Lexicon, for a further discussion of the root y-r-h. The word "moderately" in the KJV may be a mistranslation. This word was translated from the Hebrew word tsedaqah, and means righteousness (Brown, Driver, and Briggs, Hebrew and English Lexicon, p. 842.) With the Hebrew preposition li attached to it, as in Joel 2:23 of the Hebrew Bible, the word could be translated "in regards to righteousness." This phrase combined with the Hebrew word moreh is hamoreh litsedaqah, which can be interpreted as the "teacher/early rain in regard to righteousness." This combination again suggests that water is used as an image of instruction or blessing.

 

36. The "former sea" can also be translated as the Eastern Sea and the Dead Sea (Brown, Driver, and Briggs, Hebrew and English Lexicon, p. 870.) The "hinder sea" can also be translated Western Sea and refers to the Mediterranean Sea. (Brown, Driver, and Briggs, Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament, p. 30.)

 

37. Joseph Smith, Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, sel. Joseph Fielding Smith (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1976), p. 286.

 

38. See Brown, Driver, and Briggs, Hebrew and English Lexicon, p. 635-36.

 

39. Walter Eichrodt, Ezekiel: A Commentary (London: SCM Press Ltd., 1966), p. 585.

 

40. Bruce R. McConkie, Mormon Doctrine, 2d ed. (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1976), p. 494.

 

41. Bruce R. McConkie, The Millennial Messiah (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1982), p. 328.

 

42. Lau, "Garden," p. 161; however, Latter-day Saints should be aware that Joseph Smith did reveal that the location of the Garden of Eden was in Jackson County, Missouri. See Doctrines of Salvation, 3:74; and Journal of Discourses, 10:235; 11:336-37.

 

43. Lau, "Garden," p. 161.

 

44. Gerhard von Rad, Genesis: A Commentary (Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1972), p. 79.

 

45. Joseph Smith, Teachings, p. 93.

 

46. Joseph Fielding Smith, Doctrines, 3:65.

 

47. James Kugel in his book, The Idea of Biblical Poetry, provides some illuminating information to this passage in Isaiah. He informs us that many times, as in Isaiah 55:1, the midrashist says that "the word water is used where it obviously means not water but something like Torah or Divine Learning. . . . We must therefore be careful to consider this other meaning of water whenever it appears in scripture; even here where actual water seems to fit the text, perhaps we ought to understand Torah." Latter-day Saints can find more credible evidence for this passage from Isaiah in the Book of Mormon. In 2 Nephi 9:50-51,Jacob interprets this verse as an invitation to "come unto the Holy One of Israel." In this way people are invited not only to come unto the Law but, more importantly, to come unto the Lawgiver, who is Christ.

 

 

(Richard D. Draper, ed., A Witness of Jesus Christ: The 1989 Sperry Symposium on the Old Testament [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1990], 281.)

 

 

Zechariah 14 – His concluding prophesy, the 2nd coming

 

(Zechariah 14:1-11.)

 

1 Behold, the day of the LORD cometh, and thy spoil shall be divided in the midst of thee.

 

2 For I will gather all nations against Jerusalem to battle; and the city shall be taken, and the houses rifled, and the women ravished; and half of the city shall go forth into captivity, and the residue of the people shall not be cut off from the city.

 

3 Then shall the LORD go forth, and fight against those nations, as when he fought in the day of battle.

 

4 ¶ And his feet shall stand in that day upon the mount of Olives, which is before Jerusalem on the east, and the mount of Olives shall cleave in the midst thereof toward the east and toward the west, and there shall be a very great valley; and half of the mountain shall remove toward the north, and half of it toward the south.

 

5 And ye shall flee to the valley of the mountains; for the valley of the mountains shall reach unto Azal: yea, ye shall flee, like as ye fled from before the earthquake in the days of Uzziah king of Judah: and the LORD my God shall come, and all the saints with thee.

 

6 And it shall come to pass in that day, that the light shall not be clear, nor dark:

 

7 But it shall be one day which shall be known to the LORD, not day, nor night: but it shall come to pass, that at evening time it shall be light.

 

8 And it shall be in that day, that living waters shall go out from Jerusalem; half of them toward the former sea, and half of them toward the hinder sea: in summer and in winter shall it be.

 

9 And the LORD shall be king over all the earth: in that day shall there be one LORD, and his name one.

 

10 All the land shall be turned as a plain from Geba to Rimmon south of Jerusalem: and it shall be lifted up, and inhabited in her place, from Benjamin's gate unto the place of the first gate, unto the corner gate, and from the tower of Hananeel unto the king's winepresses.

 

11 And men shall dwell in it, and there shall be no more utter destruction; but Jerusalem shall be safely inhabited.

 

The Worldwide Rule of Zion's King (Zech. 9-14)

 

The visions discussed above were not the last of those seen by Zechariah. The second portion of his book records further details concerning the coming of the Messiah. Looking to a future day, the prophet saw judgment poured out against those who would fight against the Lord's chosen people (Zech. 9:1-8), and the witnessed the coming of Zion's king (Zech. 9:9-17). Before that day, however, he saw that Israel must be gathered. Using the symbols of shepherding, he envisioned the summons of scattered Israel (Zech. 10:1-12) and the wail of the shepherds, Israel's leaders, as they realize that they were greatly responsible for her loss (Zech. 11:1-3). Finally would come the purification of Jerusalem (Zech. 12:1-14), the cleansing of her lands of false prophecy (Zech. 13:1-6), and the separation of the wicked from the righteous (Zech. 13:7-9). Zechariah concluded his prophecy with the glorious vision of the coming of the Lord, who will rout his foes and dwell in glory within the holy city (Zech. 14:1-21). "In that day," he wrote, even the bells on the horses and the mundane pots and pans of Jerusalem would be consecrated to the Lord's service (Zech. 14:20-21). And all of God's children will be invited to the millennial feast (Zech. 14:16, 21).

 

Some Specific Prophecies of the Coming Messiah

 

In the breadth of his vision, the prophet alluded to events associated with both the first and the second comings of the Messiah. It seems well to conclude this discussion with specific mention of two of the former and one of the latter.

 

In chapter 9 Zechariah taught of the coming of the great king, not in glory with armies, but meek and humble, riding on a donkey colt, a symbol of royalty but expressing the Lord's essential peaceableness. fn This prophecy clearly describes the first coming of the Lord as a man of peace and blessing and foreshadows his triumphal entry into Jerusalem, which many of his followers saw as a fulfillment of this prophecy (see Matt. 21:4-5; John 12:14-16). fn But the fulfillment was not complete with that event alone, because the larger context of the passage is millennial (see Zech. 9:10). Like many messianic prophecies in the Old Testament, this one foresees both Christ's first and second comings.

 

In chapter 11 Zechariah presented the allegory of the good shepherd who tries to save the sheep but because of opposition cannot do it. Finally, he quits in anger, breaks his two staves, and demands his wages. He is paid the sum of thirty pieces of silver. These he throws down before the potter inside the Lord's house, in testimony before Jehovah of his wrongs and rejection. This allegory reflects the rejection of the true shepherd who was sold for thirty pieces of silver and delivered over to false brethren. This betrayer's ransom later bought a potter's field (Matt. 27:7-10).

 

Looking to the Second Coming, the prophet described the participation of the great King in a battle for the holy city (Zech. 12:1-4; 14:1-5). As nations mount against the covenant people, the Lord himself will intervene. He shall stand upon the Mount of Olives, which shall be split in two. His people shall rush to him in the newly formed valley and there learn his true identity. Amid tears of sorrow and rejoicing, they will acknowledge him as their Lord and King (cf. D&C 45:48-53; 133:20, 35). At that time he will subdue all enemies, and the earth shall rest under his divine power. Little wonder Zechariah rejoiced in the testimony of his King and worked so diligently to bring his people to him.

 

 

Richard D. Draper is assistant professor of ancient scripture at Brigham Young University.

 

 

(Kent P. Jackson, ed., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 4: 1 Kings to Malachi [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1993], 357.)

 

 

 

All nations are against Jerusalem to battle.  The Book of Mormon speaks of the final war as a battle between good and evil. 

 

Christ stands on the Mt. of Olives, it is symbolic of cutting the covenant, east and west.  When Christ comes it will be a time period of light and truth. 

 

Feast of Tabernacles was like our Christmas season, light and water were critical to the ceremonies.  The candelabras were placed on the 4 corners of the temple, the light was very bright, like a reenactment of Christ coming in light and glory.

 

This assembly was represented as the first proper observance of the festival since Joshua (Nehemiah 8:17). Actually, the first company of Jews returning from Babylon had celebrated Sukkot by building an altar and making burnt offerings (Ezra 3:1-6). But enemies hindered the rebuilding of the Temple. About 520 b.c., encouraged by the prophecies of Haggai and Zechariah, the Jews resumed work on the Temple (Ezra 4:24-5:1). One of Haggai's prophecies was given on the first day of Sukkot (Haggai 2:1-9), evidently in memory of Solomon's Temple. Much of the prophecy of Zechariah deals with the future restoration of the monarchy at the time of Sukkot. These are, in effect, messianic prophecies, some of which were fulfilled by Jesus at his first coming, while others will be fulfilled when he returns to Jerusalem. For example, coming seated on an ass (9:9), the blood of the covenant (9:11), the blowing of the trumpet (9:14), and the new wine (9:15-16). In Zechariah 9:16, we read that "in that day" the Lord shall save. There is mention of clouds and of rains (10:1) and a threat to smite horses (9:10; 12:4; 14:15), reminiscent of the Paragraph of the King. There is also mention of the tents of Judah (12:7; 14:15). Each family is apart (12:12-14). A new fountain, to accompany the rains, is to come forth from the Temple (13:1; 14:8). A covenant will be made with the Lord's people (13:9), and Jerusalem will then be cut in half by the enemy (14:2; the two bodies of people at Sukkot?—cf. Mosiah 25:1-4). But the Lord will defeat Israel's enemies (14:3). At the critical moment, he will appear to reign on earth as King (14:9, 16-17; cf. the crown in 9:16). The Feast of Tabernacles will be celebrated (14:16, 18-19), along with sacrifices (14:20-21). Those who do not come to celebrate the feast and make covenant with God will not receive the promised rains (14:17). Jesus' hesitation to attend the Sukkot festival in Jerusalem (John 7:1-13) was perhaps because the time for his coming in glory was not yet (John 7:6). His first coming in triumph was just before Passover (on what has come to be known as "Palm Sunday"), and his second will be at Sukkot. When, at length, he did attend the Sukkot festival, Jesus spoke of the "living water" (John 7:37-38), probably an allusion to the water poured on the altar during the festival (cf. Zechariah 13:1; Zech.14:8; Ezekiel 47:1-12). There are other allusions to Sukkot in statements made by Jesus at that time.

 

(John M. Lundquist and Stephen D. Ricks, eds., By Study and Also by Faith: Essays in Honor of Hugh W. Nibley on the Occasion of His Eightieth Birthday, 27 March 1990, 2 vols. [Salt Lake City and Provo: Deseret Book Co., Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies, 1990], 2: .)

 

 

John 7-9 – The Feast of Tabernacles.  Christ controls the living water which is the gift of the Holy Ghost which no one has received yet (Acts 2).  We receive the living water by coming to Christ.

 

(John 7:38-39.)

 

38 He that believeth on me, as the scripture hath said, out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water.

 

39 (But this spake he of the Spirit, which they that believe on him should receive: for the Holy Ghost was not yet given; because that Jesus was not yet glorified.)

 

Christ said he is the light of the world, they don’t have to wait for the Millennium for this gift, they can have it now by the gift of the Holy Ghost.

 

(John 8:12.)

 

12 ¶ Then spake Jesus again unto them, saying, I am the light of the world: he that followeth me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life.

 

 

 

John 7-9 in Light
of the Feast of Tabernacles

Bruce Satterfield
Department of Religious Education,
Brigham Young University - Idaho

[Publised in The Testimony of John the Beloved: the 1998 Sperry Symposium on the New Testament.  Salt Lake City, UT:  Deseret Book, 1998, pp. 249-265)

One of several themes woven through the gospel of John is that Christ is the fulfilment of ancient Israel's sacred times (e.g., the Sabbath, the feasts of Passover and Tabernacles, etc). For John, these sacred times, which were an important part of New Testament Judaism, were types and shadows of Christ and his role as savior and redeemer of the world. This theme is a central aspect of John 7-9. In these chapters, John apprizes his reader of the Savior's activities during the Feast of Tabernacles, or Sukkoth, as it is known in Hebrew.

The Feast of Tabernacles was one of the three feasts commanded by the Lord that all males should annually attend (Ex. 23:17; 34:23) and what Josephus calls the "most holy and most eminent" of the three feasts of the Hebrews.(1) Understanding how Christ was the fulfilment of this most important feast is intimately connected with the feast itself. However, as is often the case in scripture, John assumes the reader is already aware of the activities associated with the Feast of Tabernacles and therefore no details of the feast are given. John only tells of the movements and sayings of Christ in connection with the feast. But as Raymond Brown has said, in order to understand what the Savior said during John 7-9 "one must have an intimate knowledge of the celebration of the Tabernacles."(2)

The focus of the following pages will be to provide that "intimate knowledge" of the Feast of Tabernacles that Brown spoke of in order to reveal how that sacred time was meant to be a type and shadow of the Savior. To arrive at this, the feast will be examined through both Biblical and Rabbinical sources. It will then be possible to examine John 7-9 in light of the Feast of Tabernacles background noting the impact of Jesus' sayings upon his listeners.

The Feast of Tabernacles background has already been the subject of scholarly discussion (mainly non-LDS). However, it is felt that many in the LDS community are not familiar with or do not have access to this essential background. Therefore, it seems appropriate that this information be made available to them.

Sources

There are two major sources available that aid our understanding of how the Feast of Tabernacles was practiced during the second temple period: (1) Biblical, (2) Rabbinical or Jewish writings. Biblical legislation regarding the feast are found in the five books of Moses (Ex. 23:14-17; 34:22,23; Leviticus 23:33-44; Numbers 29:12-40; Deuteronomy 16:13-17), and Nehemiah (8:13-18). Added to the Biblical legislation are various descriptions of the Feast of Tabernacles found in Rabbinical writings. These are important to consider because by the time of Christ there were several additional developments that had become part of the activities associated with the feast. Familiarity with these developments is essential in understanding John 7-9. Our only source for these additional activities are found in the Rabbinical writings. Chief among these writings is the legislation found in the Mishnah and Talmud.(3) Though these regulations were codified years after the destruction of the second temple and present an idealized picture of the customs associated with the Feast of Tabernacles, much of what the Rabbis have said still seems to be applicable.

Feast of Tabernacles, One of Three Temple Feasts

After the children of Israel were freed from Egyptian bondage and led by Moses to Mt. Sinai, the Lord had Moses prepare Israel to enter into a covenant with him in order to make of them "a peculiar treasure unto [the Lord] above all people" (see Exodus 19). The initial covenant Israel entered into included this command: "Three times thou shalt keep a feast unto me in the year . . . Three times in the year all thy males shall appear before the Lord GOD" (Exodus 23:14,17). The three feasts became known as the Feast of Passover, the Feast of Weeks (often called the feast of Pentecost), and the Feast of Tabernacles.

The central activities of the feasts were located in the Temple with priests in charge. This is apparent from the injunction that all "males shall appear before the Lord GOD." Though no word for temple or sanctuary is used in this command, the phrase "before the Lord" has reference to a temple or sanctuary. Regarding this, Menahem Haran states: "In general, any cultic activity to which the biblical text applies the formula 'before the Lord' can be considered an indication of the existence of a temple at the site, since this expression stems from the basic conception of the temple as a divine dwelling place and actually belongs to the temple's technical terminology."(4) That these feasts were to be held at a temple can be seen in the name given to the first sanctuary of the Israelites. What is called in the King James Version, "the Tabernacle," is in Hebrew named ohel mo'ed, meaning "tent of meeting" or "tent of feasts." Of this, Roland de Vaux wrote:

Against [the] background of daily, weekly and monthly worship, the great annual feasts stood out in relief. The general word for a 'feast' is mo'ed: the term means a fixed place or a fixed time--a rendezvous--and the desert Tent was called 'ohel mo'ed or 'The Tent of Meeting'. Thus the word came to mean a meeting or an assembly, and finally an assembly or meeting to celebrate a feast.(5)

Though the Lord commanded that all males should come to the temple during these three feasts, it appears that at least during the second temple period, often the whole family participated in the worship associated with the feasts (see Luke 2:41-50).

In light of how modern temples are used, it seems clear that these feasts were intended to be teaching experiences in which Israel would be reminded of past events and taught of future events. Further, this would be a time to renew covenants made with God. The Feast of Passover reminded Israel of their exodus from Egyptian bondage and the triumph of God over idolatry (see Exodus 12:12). It also was to remind them of the future coming of the Messiah who would free them from spiritual bondage. The Feast of Weeks or Pentecost reminded Israel of the law God gave to Israel at Mt. Sinai in the third month following their exodus from Egypt.(6) It also foreshadowed the giving of the higher law at a future time.(7) The Feast of Tabernacles recalled Israel's wandering in the wilderness for forty years and their eventual arrival into the promised land, Israel's permanent home. It also anticipated the future coming of the Messiah.
 

Feast of Tabernacle Customs

Length of the Feast

From Leviticus (23:33-44), we learn that the feast was to be held for seven days. The first day was to be a "holy convocation"; the Hebrew is mikra kodesh which means a holy summons. "It stresses the summons to an assembly where Israel, in a state of special holiness, is called to fulfil its sacred functions. Holy convocations were central aspects of each of the three great Feasts and the Day of Atonement. They were days of rest, like the sabbath, and in later times were known as sabbaths."(8) An additional "holy convocation" was to be called after the seven days were complete making the feast a total of eight days.(9) The eighth day was referred to as the "great day of the feast" (John 7:37).

Dwelling in Booths

We are also told in Leviticus that the Israelites were to build booths or small huts outside of their houses. During the seven days of the feast they were to live in the booths so that their "generations may know that I made the children of Israel to dwell in booths, when I brought them out of the land of Egypt" (Lev. 23:43). It is from these booths (the Hebrew is Sukkoth) that the Feast of Tabernacles receives its name. These booths were to remind Israel that their forefathers lived in tents during the wilderness journey and did so until they came into the promised land where they dwelt in permanent houses. Living in booths may have also reminded Israel that mortality is not the final and permanent resting place for mankind. Just as Israel was brought to a promised land for a permanent home, God's children will be brought into their final resting place only during the millennial reign of the Messiah.

The booths were generally of modest size, at least three walls and roof, and had to be outside. They could be placed in a courtyard or on the roof of a house.(10) In Nehemiah 8:16, we are told that when the Feast of Tabernacles was reinstituted after the return of the Jews from Babylonian exile, the Jews set up their booths in a number of different places: "every one upon the roof of his house, and in their courts, and in the courts of the house of God, and in the street of the water gate, and in the street of the gate of Ephraim." Rabbinical writings tell us that those traveling some distances were exempt from living in booths if they so desired (see Talmud Sukkah 26a).

Water Drawing Ceremony

A statement made by Rabbi Joshua ben Hanania in the Talmud regarding the Feast of Tabernacles states:

"The first hour was occupied with the daily morning sacrifice; from there we proceeded to prayers; from there we proceeded to the additional sacrifice, then the prayers to the additional sacrifice, then to the House of Study, then the eating and drinking, then the afternoon prayer, then the daily evening sacrifice, and after that the Rejoicing at the place of the Water-Drawing all night." (Talmud Sukkah 53a.)

In this description, the order of events of an average day during the Feast of Tabernacles is revealed, albeit incomplete, as will now be shown.

The day began with the normal daily morning burnt offering. However, during the Feast of Tabernacles a rite was added to the daily burnt offering called the water-drawing ceremony. During the preparation of the burnt offering,(11) a procession of priests with the accompaniment of flute playing and singing wended their way from the temple down to the Pool of Siloam where a priest filled a golden flask with water while a choir repeated Isa. 12:3: "with joy shall ye draw water out of the wells of salvation" (see Mishnah Sukkah 4:9; 5:1; Talmud Sukkah 48b). The Pool of Siloam was a collecting pool for the spring Gihon, the major water supply for Jerusalem. The Jews referred to water from springs or streams fit for drinking as "living water." Living water was considered the most superior form of water for ritual purification.(12)

The priests returned to the temple via the Water Gate, a gate on the south side of the wall immediately surrounding the temple within the court of Gentiles.(13) Arriving at the Water Gate a blast was made on a shofar, the Hebrew word for ram's horn. The shofar was a signaling instrument used to announce major events such as the beginning of the Sabbath, new moons, the death of a notable, or warned of approaching danger. In this case, the shofar announced the beginning of the Feast of Tabernacles which began with the water-drawing ceremony.

When the procession of priests and Levites returned from the pool of Siloam, they were met by pilgrims who had come to the Temple Mount. Each pilgrim brought with them a lulab, which consisted of a tree branch in one hand and a citron in the other (Mishnah 3:1-7). The lulab was to be waved while the morning sacrifice was being offered with the special water libation. The waving of the lulab was a Biblical injunction: "And ye shall take you on the first day the boughs of goodly trees, branches of palm trees, and the boughs of thick trees, and willows of the brook; and ye shall rejoice before the LORD your God seven days" (Leviticus 23:40).

Upon the blasting of the shofar, the group moved towards the altar of sacrifice located in the Court of the Priests which surrounded the temple. The priest with the golden flask filled with water ascended the altar and prepared to pour the libation on the morning burnt offering. While doing this, the procession that had followed the priest would circle the altar.

It appears that pilgrims joined in with the priests who were circling the altar.(14) However, this is a matter of debate. George MacRae seems to suggest that this procession was of priests alone.(16) But an incident mentioned in the Mishnah may suggest otherwise. Mishnah Sukkah 4:9 tells us that after the water was poured into the Silver Bowl, it was said to the officiating priest: "Raise thy hand!" The reason for saying this was that "on one occasion [a Sadducean priest] poured over his feet" the water (for the Sadducees did not hold to this tradition). This so outraged the pilgrims that "all the people pelted him with their citrons." This suggests that if the pilgrims were not in the procession itself they were at least close enough for them to be able to pelt the priest. The only logical places would be the court of the priests itself or perhaps in the court of the Israelites though the latter seems less likely due to its size.(17)

Whether walking around the altar or observing the procession, the following was said by the pilgrims while waving(18) their lulabs: "We beseech Thee, O Eternal, save us, we pray" (Mishnah Sukkah 3:9; see also 4:5). The priest who had charge of pouring the water then offered the water libation with a wine libation into two silver bowls on the south-west corner of the altar.

The water-drawing ceremony proceeded in this manner every day of the feast except on the seventh day when the priests (and pilgrims?) circled the altar seven times instead of just once (Mishnah Sukkah 4:5). The circumambulation of the altar seven times ended the water-drawing ritual. It was not performed on the eighth day (Mishnah Sukkah 4:1, 5),(19) though it appears that a prayer for rain was given on the eighth day (Talmud Taanith 2a-3a).

The Lighting Ceremony

According to the chronicle outlined by Rabbi Joshua ben Hanania quoted earlier, following the water-drawing ceremony there was an "additional sacrifice." According to Numbers 29:12-40, in addition to the daily morning and evening burnt offering required by the law of Moses,(20) there were additional sacrifices to be made during the Feast of Tabernacles. On the first day of the feast there was to be offered 13 young bullocks, 2 rams, 14 lambs of the first year, and one kid for a sin offering. On the second day of the feast, there was to be offered the same offerings except instead of 13 young bullocks there was only to be offered 12. On the third day the offerings were again the same with the exception of the bullocks. Only 11 were offered. This declination of bullocks continued until the seventh day when 7 bullocks were offered (the other sacrifices remaining the same). Then a change occurred on the eighth day. One bullock was offered with one ram, seven lambs and one kid for a sin offering. The account concludes with this injunction: "These things ye shall do unto the Lord in your set feast, beside your vows, and your freewill offerings, for your burnt offerings, and for your meat offerings, and for your drink offerings and for your peace offerings."

Upon the conclusion of the "additional sacrifice," the pilgrims would have opportunity to present their individual offerings, such as expressing personal devotion to God (through the burnt offering) or those associated with the cleansing of severe impurities (through the sin offering). This was a time of great rejoicing and singing including the singing of the complete Hallel or Psalms 113-118 (Mishnah Sukkah 4:8).(21) When the personal offerings were completed, the afternoon burnt offering was performed.(22)

Normally, upon the conclusion of the afternoon burnt offering, probably around sunset, the gates of the temple would be closed.(23) However on the first day of the Feast of Tabernacles the gates were left opened so that all might participate in the final rite of the day, the lighting ceremony. This occasion proved to be a most joyous and festive observance. From the Mishnah (Sukkah 5:2-3) we are told that "At the close of the first Holyday" the priests would descend from the Court of the Israelites to the Court of Women.(24) In the court four huge candelabra were placed, each "with four golden bowls at their tops and four ladders to each one." Each candelabra were fifty cubits in height. Wicks made "from the worn-out drawers and girdles of the priests" were placed in each bowl and lit. It is said that "there was no courtyard in Jerusalem that was not lit up with the light" which came from these candelabras.

The rest of the night was spent in joyous activities in the Court of Women. Mishnah Sukkah 5:4 says:

Pious men and men of good deeds used to dance before them (the candelabra) with burning torches in their hands and sang before them songs and praises. And the Levites on harps, and on lyres, and with cymbals, and with trumpets and with other instruments of music without number upon the fifteen steps leading down from the court of the Israelites to the Women's Court, corresponding to the Fifteen Songs of Ascent in the Psalms [Psalms 120-134]; upon them the Levites used to stand with musical instruments and sing hymns.

The festivities surrounding the illumination rite concluded the festival day. However, it is not clear whether or not the illumination rite was done every night, or whether the lights simply remained lit during the whole feast.

The Messianic Nature of the Feast

Both the water drawing ceremony and the lighting of the candelabra were additional aspects of the feast not found in Biblical legislation.(25) Nevertheless, they had apparently become part of the ceremonies of the feast to portray the future messianic age. We learn this from the fact that as part of the ceremonies associated with the Feast of Tabernacles, Zechariah 14, a messianic chapter, was read to all the people. Talmud Megillah 31a says: "On the first day of Tabernacles we read the section of the festivals in Leviticus, and for haftarah [a section from the prophetic books recited after the reading from the Pentateuch on Sabbaths and Holy-days], Behold a day cometh for the Lord (Zech.14)."

What is the connection between Zechariah 14 and the Feast of Tabernacles? Chapter fourteen describes the time when "the day of the Lord cometh." At a time when "all nations" have gathered against Jerusalem, the Lord will return and save his people by standing upon the Mount of Olives which shall "cleave in the midst thereof toward the east and the toward the west" providing a way to escape through the valley created. Having saved his people, the Lord insists that "every one that is left of all the nations which came against Jerusalem shall even go up from year to year to worship the King, the LORD of hosts, and to keep the feast of tabernacles" (vs. 16). Failure to keep this command would result in the rains failing (see vs.s 17-19). This is the first Biblical association of rain with the festival. But as George MacRae has said, "the fact that it was celebrated at the end of the harvest and immediately before the autumnal rainy season, we can well imagine that the petition for rain is as old as the feast itself."(26)

With the coming of the Lord, the messianic age is inaugurated. Zechariah points out two important aspects associated with the messianic age. The first is perpetual light. In Zechariah 14:6-7, describing the day when the Lord comes, it says: "And it shall come to pass in that day, that the light shall not be clear, nor dark: but it shall be one day which shall be known to the LORD, not day, nor night: but it shall come to pass, that at evening time it shall be light." The second characteristic of the messianic age is akin to rain, that of water. Zechariah says: "And it shall be in that day, that living waters shall go out from Jerusalem" (Zech. 14:8).(27) It seems safe to assume that by the reading of Zechariah 14 during the feast the application of these messianic features to the Feast of Tabernacles was commonplace among the people.

From the foregoing, it is possible to see that the two features of the messianic age described by Zechariah in chapter 14 were made an important part of the Feast of Tabernacles ceremonies. The water-drawing ceremony is the compliment of the living water flowing from Jerusalem in 14:8. The lighting of the huge candelabra is the symbolic counterpart of the continuous day found in 14:6-7.

Zechariah 14 gives us further insight into the meaning of the lighting ceremony. When the Messiah comes, inaugurating the messianic age, he will be the light of all the world, not just the Jews. This is perhaps why four candelabra were used in the lighting ceremony. Four is often a symbolic number representing geographical completeness. This is because their are four corners of the world. Thus, the lighting of the four candelabra would have symbolized that light would be given to all the world through the coming Messiah. This would have been emphasized further by the fact that each candelabra had four bowls.(28)
 

 

JESUS AND THE FEAST OF TABERNACLES

Jesus and the Living Waters

It is in this setting that we find Jesus in John 7-9. We are told in John 7:14 that Jesus arrived midway through the feast.(29) His first few days at the temple were filled with confrontations concerning the authority of his teachings (John 7: 15-36). Then on "the last day, that great day of the feast," Jesus "stood" and issued this challenge: "If any man thirst, let him come unto me, and drink. He that believeth on me, as the scripture hath said, out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water" (John 7:37-38). Then John added, "But this spake he of the Spirit, which they that believe on him should receive" (John 7:39). That is, the Holy Ghost which is given to those who come unto Christ brings life to their souls.

The impact of this challenge is lost unless one understands the water-drawing ceremony of the Feast of Tabernacles as described in these pages. Having daily drawn water from the Pool of Siloam, then pouring it on the morning offering while shouting, "Save us Lord," the absence of the water-drawing ceremony on the eighth day would have been profound. Hence, on the day when living water was not drawn from the spring, and only a prayer for rain was offered--a day that perhaps symbolized Israel's dependence upon God for water that sustains life--the Savior declared that if any thirst, they should come to him for living waters. However, the water he offered was not for physical but spiritual survival. His water was the cleansing and sustaining influence of the Holy Ghost necessary for the salvation of the souls of mankind. Interestingly enough, the Jerusalem Talmud(30) states that the Jews understood the water drawing ceremony to be symbolic of the Holy Ghost: "Why is the name of it called, The drawing out of water? Because of the pouring out of the Holy Spirit, according to what is said: 'With joy shall ye draw water out of the wells of salvation.'"(31) Thus the prayers of the priests and pilgrims attending the Feast of Tabernacles had been answered . . .but not in the way they had expected!(32)

Jesus is the Light of the World

On the day following the Savior's challenge to come to him for living water, the Savior was once again at the temple teaching. While in the Court of Women,(33) the Savior declared to the multitude, "I am the light of the world: he that followeth me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life" (John 8:12). Could there be any doubt in the minds of his listeners as to what he was claiming? In the very place where the huge candelabras were lit giving light to "every courtyard in Jerusalem," symbolizing the continuous light given to all the world during the messianic age, Jesus proclaimed that he was that light.(34) Not only the light of Jerusalem, but of all the world. Even Jewish tradition held that God gives man light.(35) It is obvious that he was claiming to be the Messiah in their own hearing.

To give credence to His claim, the Savior demonstrated his power to give light to the world through a miracle that is recorded only by John. In John 9:1-7, the story of a man born blind follows on the heals of the Feast of the Tabernacles. The story begins when Jesus "saw a man which was blind from his birth." When asked why, the Savior responded "that the works of God should be made manifest in him." Then he said, "I must work the works of him that sent me, while it is day: the night cometh, when no man can work. As long as I am in the world, I am the light of the world." Upon that "he spat on the ground, and made clay of the spittle, and he anointed the eyes of the blind man with the clay, and said unto him, Go, wash in the pool of Siloam." The man did exactly what he was told. After he had washed his eyes in the same pool that the priest had drawn water as part of the water drawing ceremony of the Feast of Tabernacles, he came out seeing.

Two major symbols of the Feast of Tabernacles, water and light, were present in the miracle. By spiting onto the ground, Jesus demonstrated that indeed the living waters or the Spirit of the Holy Ghost which can give man light does indeed come from Him, for "out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water" (John 7:38). This is further emphasized by the washing of the waters in the pool of Siloam which symbolized the Holy Ghost.
 

Conclusion

It is undeniable that Jesus' statements during the Feast of Tabernacles are highlighted by the feast itself. The Savior chose a sacred time of the year when the Jews looked forward with great rejoicing through ritual action to the coming of the Messiah. Through the instrumentality of the feast, Jesus declared that he was the promised Messiah; that he was the literal fulfillment of everything promised in the Feast of Tabernacles. It is clear from the hostile reactions of the Jews that they saw it this way, supposing that by so doing he was speaking blasphemy (John 7:30,32,44-53; 8:59).
 

References

1. The Antiquities of the Jews, 8.4.1. See also George W. MacRae, "The Meaning and Evolution of the Feast of Tabernacles," The Catholic Biblical Quarterly 22, no.3 (1960): 251.

2. Raymond E. Brown, The Gospel According to John. Anchor Bible Series Vol. 29 (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1983), 326.

3. During the second temple period, many Jews (including the Pharisees) followed an oral interpretation of the written law of Moses found in Exodus through Deuteronomy. This is often referred to as the "oral law." In the New Testament, the oral law is called the tradition of the elders" (Matthew 15:2; Mark 7:3,5). In the second century A. D., the oral tradition was reduced to writing and systematically organized by Rabbi Judah the Prince. It is called the Mishnah. The Mishnah is grouped into six orders, which in turn are divided into sixty-three treatises called tractates.

Over time, the Rabbis held many debates concerning the Mishnah. The records and minutes of these debates were added to the Mishnah. This compilation has become known as the Talmud. There were two different groups of Rabbis that produced a Talmud: a group in Babylon and a group in Jerusalem. The Babylonian Talmud is the most commonly used of the two Talmuds. It has been translated in several languages. The Jerusalem Talmud is not often used and is only found in Hebrew. (For a complete discussion of the history of the Mishnah and Talmud, see Isaac Unterman, The Talmud: An Analytical Guide to its History and Teachings, [New York: Bloch, 1952].)

In this paper, all references to the Talmud refer to the Babylonian Talmud unless otherwise stated. Further, in this paper, I will follow MacRae's thinking who states: "We shall not be concerned with the dating of the Mishnah; there is no doubt that at least some of the precepts in it go back long before the final crystallization of the written form. It would be idle also to be deterred by the fact that many of the legal prescriptions are meaningless in view of the destruction of the Temple. As far as the feast is concerned, the Mishnah presents an idealized picture of the Temple ritual but also the necessary information for the proper observance of them elsewhere" ("The Meaning and Evolution of the Feast of Tabernacles," 270-271).

4. Menahem Haran, Temples and Temple Service in Ancient Israel (Winona Lake, Indiana: Eisenbrauns. 1985; Originally published: Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978), 26.

5. Roland de Vaux, Ancient Israel: Vol. 2 Religious Institutions (New York: McGraw-Hill,1965), 470.

6. Talmud Pesahim 68b states that the Feast of Weeks commemorated "the day on which the Torah was given." See also Talmud Meglillah 31a and The Book of Jubilees 1:1; 6:17-19. This is not only the view of ancient Judaism, but modern Jewry as well. Writing of this feast, Rabbi Hayim Halevy Donin states: "Shavuot [Heb. for feast of Weeks] commemorates the awesome event experienced by the children of Israel seven weeks after their exodus from Egypt when they camped at the foot of Mt. Sinai somewhere in the Sinai Peninsula. This event was the Revelation, when God's will was revealed to Israel. It marked the declaration of the Ten Commandments" (Hayim Halvey Donin, To be a Jew [New York: Basic Books, 1972], 239).

7. It should be remembered that as a result of rebellion, the law Israel ultimately received at Mt. Sinai was the law of Moses, which was only preparatory for the higher law that would be given later. The law of Moses functioned through the authority of the lesser or Aaronic Priesthood. The higher law promised would function under the authority of the higher or Melchizedek Priesthood. It would include the ordinances associated with that priesthood, the first of which is the laying on of hands for the gift of the Holy Ghost. The reception of the gift of the Holy Ghost was given on the Day of Pentecost (Acts 1-2), an appropriate time to demonstrate that the higher law had been given by God to Israel.

8. J. C. Rylaarsdam, "Convocation, Holy," in Interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible, 4 Vols. (Nashville, Tenn.: Abingdon, 1962), 1:678-679.

9. In the Talmud the eighth day is actually considered a separate festival (see Sukkah 48a).

10. See Talmud Shabbath 154b and Louis Ginzberg, The Legends of the Jews 7 Vols. (Philadephia: The Jewish Publication Society of America, 1913), 4:405. Roofs were generally flat with a staircase ascending from the outside and were used for a variety of reasons.

11. The Mishnah describes the rite of the burnt offering as being performed in four parts with each part being determined by lot. The first lot was the clearing of the ashes from the Altar (Yoma 2:2; Tamid 1:4). The ashes were cleared from the Altar "at cockcrow or close to it, either before or after it" but during "the Festivals at the first watch" for "before cockcrow time drew near the Forecourt was already filled with Israelites" (Yoma 1:8). Josephus tells us that the temple gates which were normally kept closed until morning were opened at midnight during festivals (The Antiquities of the Jews, 18.2.2). The second lot determined "who should slaughter, who should toss blood, (and) who should remove the ashes from the Inner Altar, (and) who should clear away the ashes from the Candlestick, (and) who should take up the limbs [of the burnt offering] to the Altar-slope" (Yoma 2:3; see also Tamid 3:1). The animal could not be slaughtered before dawn, therefore, the Captain of the Temple (sagan ha kohanim) said to one, "Go forth and see if the time has arrived for slaughtering." The priest went to a high point of the temple to see if the light of morning lit up the east "as far as Hebron." If so the animal could be slaughtered (Yoma 3:1; see also Tamid 3:2-7). The third lot determined who would offer the incense upon the Inner-Altar (Yoma 2:4; Tamid 5:2-6:3). The fourth lot determined which priests would offer the burnt offering on the Altar (Yoma 2:5; Tamid 4:3). For detailed descriptions concerning the offering of the morning and evening burnt offering (the Tamid) see Shmuel Safrai, Ritual in "Temple," Encyclopedia Judaica (Jerusalem: Keter, 1971): Vol 15:974-977; Shmuel Safrai, Daily whole-offerings in "The Temple," in The Jewish People in the First Century, 2 Vols. (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1987), 2:887-890; Aaron Rothkoff, Second Temple Period in "Sacrifice," Encyclopedia Judaica (Jerusalem: Keter, 1971): Vol 14: 607-609; and Emil Schurer, A History of the Jewish People in the Age of Jesus Christ. A new version, revised and edited by Geza Vermes, Ferges Millar, and Matthew Black. 2 Vols. (Edinburg: T&T Clark, 1973), 2: 299-308.

12. According to Mishnah Mikvaoth 1:1: "There are six grades among ritual baths, in ascending order of superiority." These are (1) water in cisterns, (2) water of rain drippings, (3) mikvehs, (4) wells, (5) salty water or hot water from a spring, and (6) living water (Mikvaoth 1:1-8). Only "living water" could be used in the purification of lepers (Lev. 14:5) and the defilement caused by dead corpses (Num. 19:17).

13. The main sources for a description of the temple come from the Mishnah and Josephus. But there is discrepancy in the different accounts. According to Middoth 1:4-5 and Josephus Antiquities of the Jews 15.11.5, there are seven gates into the Court of the Priests including the Nicanor gate (which does not actually open into the Court of Priests but into the Court of the Israelites). In Middoth 2:6, Shekalim 6:3 and Josephus' The Wars of the Jews 5.5.2, eight gates are mentioned not including the Nicanor gate. Most scholars accept the smaller number placing the Water Gate as the third gate from the west on the southern side of the Court of the Priests. This would place it close to the laver (see Shmuel Safrai and Michael Avi-Yona, "Temple," Encyclopaedia Judaica, 15:962-967).

14. It is Safrai's belief that the people were involved in the procession itself. Says he:

"The people participated in all the rites of the Feast of Tabernacles and, with the exception of the water-libation which was performed by a priest or the high priest, their role in Temple rites and customs was equal to that of the priests. They surrounded the altar with palm-branches and with willow, which is, of course, the essence of the water-libation ceremonies . . . All the people participated in the procession around the altar, (from which they were barred during the rest of the year) with the palm-branch.(15)

15. Safrai, "Temple," in The Jewish People of the First Century, 2:894-895." "" -

16. George W. McCrae, "The Meaning and Evolution of the Feast of Tabernacles," 272.

17. This is the view of J. C. Rylaarsdam who describes this scene in this manner: "The water was brought up in solemn fashion with the blowing of the shofar at the city gate. The pilgrims, singing the Hallel and carrying their lulabs, witnessed the circumambulation of the altar by the priestly procession and waving their lulabs, joined in the great cry: 'Save us, we beseech thee, O LORD'" ("Booths, Feast of," in Interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible, 4 Vols. [Nashville, Tenn.: Abingdon, 1962], 1:456).

18. Mishnah Sukkah 3:9 says: "And where do they wave?--At the beginning and end of Give thanks unto the Eternal and at We beseech Thee, O Eternal, save us, we pray; this is the view of the School of Hillel. The School of Shammai says, Also at We beseech Thee, O Eternal, send us prosperity, we pray."

19. In the Talmud, there is a debate about how often the water-drawing rite was done as well as when it was performed last in the feast (see Taanith 2a-3a). However, the Mishnah, which consists of earlier Rabbinical writings, suggests that the last day the water-drawing ritual was performed was the seventh day (Sukkah 4:1; but see Rabbi Judah's comments in Sukkah 4:9). This agrees with Biblical legislation that requires the waving of the lulab, a ritual performed during the pouring of the water on the altar, for seven days (see Leviticus 23:40).

20. See Exodus 29:38-42 and Numbers 28:2-4.

21. See Safrai, Ritual in "Temple," Encylopedia Judaica, 982.

22. Mishnah Pesachim 5:1 says: "The daily burnt-offering was slaughtered at the eighth hour and a half and offered up at the ninth hour and a half." However, it is not clear whether the time on this was strictly held during the Feast of Tabernacles.

23. See Safrai, Ritual in "Temple," in Encylopedia Judaica, 15:976.

24. From Talmudic sources it appears that "the place of the Water-Drawing" is in the Court of the Women. Talmud Sukkah 53a tells of the rejoicing that took place after the lighting of the huge candelabra's which Mishnah Sukkah 5:2 says took place in the Court of Women. Yet Talmud Sukkah 53a speaks of this place as "the place of Water-Drawing." In a note on Mishnah Sukkah 5:1, Philip Backman suggests the reason for this name was because there was a "well, in the Women's Forecourt, from which the water was drawn for libation on Sukkoth" (Backman, Mishnayoth, 2:341). However, Raymond Brown says of this place: "In connection with the water ceremonies at the feast of Tabernacles, the Jerusalem Talmud (Sukkah 55a) says that the part of the temple precincts traversed during the procession with the water was called the 'Place of Drawing,' because from there 'they drew the holy spirit' (also Midrash Rabbah lxx 8 on Gen xxix 1)" (Brown, The Gospel According to John. The Anchor Bible, v. 29, 329).

25. The Rabbi's believed that these traditions were given at Mt. Sinai but only passed down orally. See Lightfoot, A Commentary on the New Testament from the Talmud and Hebraica, 3:322.

26. MacRae, "The Meaning and Evolution of the Feast of Tabernacles," 269. The association of the Feast of Tabernacles with rain is well known from Mishnaic times. The tractate Ta'anith, which deals with special fasts that are called for due to continued drought, begins with the statement: "From what time should they begin to mention the Power of Rain? R. Eliezer says, From the first Holyday day of the Festival of Tabernacles; R. Joshua says, From the last Holyday day of the Festival of Tabernacles" (1:1).

27. cf. Ps. 46:4; 65:9; Isa. 8:6; Jer. 2:13; Ezek. 47:1-12; Joel 3:18; Rev. 22:1-2. On this, Brown comments thus: "The fountain of waters that overflows from Jerusalem . . . can be interpreted against the background of abundant rain sent by God during Tabernacles" (Brown, The Gospel According to John. The Anchor Bible, v. 29, 327). Joyce Baldwin interprets this verse in this way: "The dream of an abundant water supply in Jerusalem will become fact. Instead of the spring Gihon, which supplied water that 'flowed gently' to become the Siloam brook (Isa. 8:6), and was never really adequate for the city's needs, rivers independent of seasonal rainfall would rise in Jerusalem, to flow constantly to east and west until they reached the Dead Sea and the Mediterranean" (Joyce Baldwin, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi. Vol. 24, Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries [London: Tyndale, 1972], 203).

28. Numerology is an important aspect of Jewish thought. Numbers like 3, 4, and 7 represented wholeness or completeness. Three because the number three has a beginning, a middle, and an end. Four because there are four corners of the world. Seven because the world was created in seven days. To emphasize the completeness of something, often the number was multiplied by itself: 3 x 3, 4 x 4, or 7 x 7.

29. The reason for his late arrival seems to be due to the pressure of his non-believing brothers who wished him to go to the feast simply to perform miracles. Brown sees this as a temptation faced by the Savior similar to the account in Matthew (4:1-11) and Luke (4:1-13) where the Savior is tempted to display his power by jumping from the pinnacle of the temple (see Brown, The Gospel According to John. The Anchor Bible, v. 29, 308 for complete discussion). Therefore, the Savior delays his departure to the feast so that it is clear that his reasons for being there are not to display his power.

30. See note 3.

31. Jerusalem Talmud Sukkah 55a, quoted from Morris, The Gospel According to John, 421; see also F.F. Bruce, The Gospel of John (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 1983), 182, 187 n.13; John Lightfoot, A Commentary on the New Testament from the Talmud and Hebraica 4 Vols. (Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson, 1979), 3:322-323.

32. The theme of Christ as the living waters permeates the gospel of John wherein is recorded several incidences that occurred during the ministry of Christ that revolve around water. For example, John records the story of the Savior offering living water to the woman of Samaria who was drawing water from a well. To her, he said: "Whosoever drinketh of this water shall thirst again: But whosoever drinketh of the water that I shall give him shall never thirst; but the water that I shall give him shall be in him a well of water springing up into everlasting life" (John 4:13-14). That Christ has the power to give this living water is demonstrated through two stories that evidence Christ's power over water: the marriage at Cana where Christ turned water turn to wine (John 2:1-11) and the Savior's walking on water (John 615-21). To dramatize the point further, John, alone, records the piercing of the Savior's side while upon the cross. In that account it is said the when the soldiers were breaking the legs of the three who were crucified, they saw that the Savior was already dead "and they brake not his legs: but one of the soldiers with a spear pierced his side, and forthwith came there out blood and water" (John 19:33-34; emphasis added). John's point is clear. The living waters do come from the Savior.

In view of this, the reader of John's gospel is stunned to discover that while on the cross the Savior cried out, "I thirst" (John 19:28), a statement only recorded by John. He to whom all must go to receive "living waters" so they may "never thirst" again (John 4:14), now thirsted! This pathetic statement reveals that while on the cross, the Savior, in bearing our sins, infirmities, fears, guilt, and remorse, had "descended below all things" that he might comprehend "all things" (D&C 88:6). Thus, he became like "the poor and needy" who "seek water, and there is none" (Isaiah 41:17). He had become like us, lost, alone, and thirsty. In this condition, the Savior gained the compassion and mercy needed to bring the living waters to those who seek it.

33. John 8:20 tells us that he was in the treasury, which is the Court of the Women.

34. J. H. Bernard sees the lighting of the candelabras as a possible background behind Jesus' saying, but offers another possible reason: "But Philo's account of the Feast of Tabernacles would furnish an equally plausible explanation. He says that this feast is held at the autumnal equinox, in order that the world (kosmos) may be full, not only by day but also by night, of the all-beautiful light (tou pagkalou photos), as at this season there is no twilight (de septen. 24) . . . The passage of Philo shows, however, that the Feast of Tabernacles suggested the idea of light to some minds" (J. H. Bernard, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to St. John, 2 Vols. The New International Critical Commentary [Edinburgh: T&T Clark,1985], 2:291).

35. See for example, Psalms 27:1, Isa. 60:19. "The later Rabbis applied the thought to the Messiah: 'Light is the Name of Messiah,' they said" (Bernard, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to St. John, 2:292).

The Millennium is proceeded by people who are righteous who usher in the 2nd coming.  We must destroy Babylon in our own lives, rid our homes and lives of worldliness NOW.  That’s what it means to come unto Christ.

 

John tells of Christ being the one who fulfilled sacred places and sacred times, He is the Messianic one who has been foretold for centuries.  We must have Christ’s life and light.

 

Jeremiah did his calling well.  Both Jeremiah and Ezekiel saw the restoration and the 2nd coming.

 

The Old Testament is the 1st witness of Christ and also shows the destruction of the wicked.

 

Study and understand the character and mercy and patience of God at its best throughout the Old Testament.  The Old Testament is the foundation for all of the other standard works.

 

God really is kind and loving