Matthew 21-22                     

 

BYUI New Testament Symposium

Bro. Bruce Satterfield

January 25, 2003

 

 

Matthew – Mark – Luke are the 3 synoptic gospels, they cover the same material of Christ’s ministry, but are writing to different audiences, from Jews to Gentiles, think of them as their own personal testimonies.

 

The last chapters of each book are the climax portions.  Trial, crucifixion, resurrection

 

Matthew 21 – The 2 parables describe the corruptness of Jewish society.  Like a den of thieves.  The cleansing of the temple may have only occurred once. 

 

Matthew 21:1-11 – Christ’s triumphal entry into Jerusalem  He usually avoided the city and stayed in Bethany, which is located 1-2 miles east of Jerusalem, see verse 18.

 

Matthew 21:12 – Jeremiah 7:11

 

Matthew 21:13 – The Greek difference between thief and robber one broke into houses to steal, the other formed armed gangs which plundered the elite and wealthy.

 

Matthew 21:19-22 – The curse of the fig tree was symbolic of the society of the times.  Fig trees usually had the fruit come on first THEN the leaves came out.  There are 3 pickings of fruit during one year.  Mar-Apr, Aug, Sept-Oct.  The apostles have seen his power to heal; now they witness his power to destroy.  The act was likened to the destruction of Jerusalem.  It looked good from the outside, but bore no fruit, and was thus considered of no value.

 

 

Cursing the Fig Tree

 

Matt. 21:18-21; Mark 11:12-21

 

Background: Persons involved were Jesus and the disciples. The place was near Bethany.

 

 Occasion: While Jesus and the Twelve were travelling from Bethany to Jerusalem, Jesus was hungry. He saw in the distance a fig tree in leaf. He went to see it; it had no figs, but leaves only.

It was not the season for figs. He said to the tree, "Let no fruit grow on thee henceforward for ever" The disciples heard him say it. As they passed by the next morning, they saw that the fig tree had withered away.

 

Purpose: The miracle was given as an object lesson to the disciples. The overriding principle here seems to be that we should be fruitful in our lives, and serve a practical purpose. Foliage (appearance) is not enough. However, it is expressly stated that it was not the season for figs. This could mean that men and women are expected to be fruitful both in season and out of season (compare Paul's exhortation in 2 Tim. 4:2). That Jesus had more purpose in mind than mere fig-picking is suggested by the Joseph Smith Translation (see Special considerations).

 

Discussion: In March or April a fig tree generally had neither leaves nor fruit. This particular tree, having leaves, had put forth a pretension to be something more than other trees, hence was a type of hypocrite. In fig trees, fruit generally appears before the leaves.

 

Special considerations: The Joseph Smith Translation makes several minor changes, mostly clarifications. But one item of considerable importance is in Mark as follows:

 

King James Version 11:13: "And seeing a fig tree... having leaves, he came, if haply he might find any thing thereon: and when he came to it, he found nothing but leaves; for the time of figs was not yet." This is enlarged and altered thus:

 

JST 11:14: "... And seeing a fig tree afar off having leaves, he came to it with his disciples; and as they supposed, he came to it to see if he might find any thing thereon." Verse 15: "And when he came to it, there was nothing but leaves; for as yet the figs were not ripe."

 

 These changes imply a difference of purpose as to why Jesus really came to the fig tree and why the disciples thought he came to the tree. This is consistent with other changes occurring throughout the Joseph Smith Translation, which tend toward greater knowledge and power for Jesus. Since it is expressly stated that it was not the time for ripe figs, it is to be expected that Jesus would at least know that, and his real purpose would be something other than the mere gathering of figs. Hence the Joseph Smith Translation places the emphasis upon the teaching content of this miracle, it being about hypocrisy.

 

 

(Robert J. Matthews, Behold the Messiah [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1994], 163.)

 

Matthew 21:23-27 – The elite (Chief Priests, Elders, and Scribes) asked him by what authority do you do these things?  Healings, cleaning the temple, etc . . .  He openly challenged their authority.  They claimed Christ was not trained for the ministry, he was a peasant!  95% of the population was peasants.  The elite held tremendous power over the population.  They owned the city and the land in the countryside.  They had the authority to tax, they taxed everything.

 

Matthew 21:24-27 – He asked the question of the authority of John’s baptism, he catches them in their deceit.

 

The 3 Parables

 

1st Parable – Matthew 21:28-32 – The Parable of the Disobedient Son.  Publicans and harlots can repent, but you chose not too.

 

2nd Parable – Matthew 21:33-46 – The Parable of the Disobedient Tenant Farmers.  There were large estate land owners who held various parcels of land throughout Israel.  This was against the Law of Moses.  They charged taxes and rent on the poor, if they couldn’t pay, their property was confiscated.  So, the rich got richer and the poor got poorer!  A vicious circle of Greed and Power

 

The gospel will be taken from the Jews and given to the Gentiles.  Christ states he is the heir, the temple is “my house”, the elite couldn’t handle this; they had to get rid of Christ.  Within a week they would!

 

3rd Parable – Matthew 22:1-14 – The Parable of the Marriage Feast.  Heavenly Father and Christ A story of his death and judgment

 

All of these parables deal with Jerusalem’s destruction, and the gospel going to the Gentiles.

 

 

TRIUMPHAL ENTRY AND A DAY OF DEBATE (Matthew 21-23)

 

JOSEPH F. MCCONKIE

 

Though we treasure all the words and acts of Christ, none have made a deeper imprint upon the hearts and minds of his followers than those things he said and did immediately before his death. This chapter will consider the events of the first three days of the Passion Week.

 

Jesus Enters the Holy City as Its King

 

At the time of the Passover it had become the habit of Jesus to take refuge in the village of Bethany, which rested near the eastern crest of the Mount of Olives facing Jericho and the Dead Sea. In distance it was little more than a mile and one-half from Jerusalem and the temple. Here Christ was the honored guest of Lazarus, his sisters Mary and Martha, and Simon the leper, in whose home he would yet receive a holy anointing preparatory to his burial. That Sunday morning his disciples gathered so that they might walk together to the temple, where it was anticipated that Jesus would preach to the great throngs assembling from many nations for the commemoration of the Passover, setting in motion events by which he would be proclaimed the Messiah and fulfill ancient prophecy.

 

As the little band left Bethany for Jerusalem, they soon had a multitude following them. The raising of Lazarus from the dead after his body had begun to decay was a miracle of such magnitude that as word of it spread, people were drawn to the vicinity to see for themselves this man who once was dead and to hear the words of this miracle-working prophet from Galilee. At Bethphage, Jesus told two of his disciples, presumably Peter and John, to go to a nearby village, where they would find an ass with a colt that had never before been ridden. They were to untie the colt and bring it to him. If they were asked what they were doing, they were instructed to say, "The Lord hath need of him," and without further question they would be allowed to take it. fn

 

The disciples then went into the village as they had been instructed, found the colt as they had been told, were challenged as anticipated, responded according to their instructions, and were allowed to bring the young donkey to the Master. Then they set their coats on the colt, "and Jesus took the colt and sat thereon; and they followed him." (JST, Matt. 21:5.) The gathering multitude commenced to throw their own outer garments, along with palm branches, in the path of the colt with such cries as "Hosanna to the Son of David: Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord; Hosanna in the highest." (Matt. 21:9.)

 

Like much that was to take place in that last week, this procession was richly symbolic and deeply rooted in scriptural tradition. One writer has said: "To ride upon white asses or ass-colts was the privilege of persons of high rank, princes, judges, and prophets." fn Christ's doing so attested that he entered the Holy City as its rightful king, as did the shouts of Hosanna—meaning "save now," "save we pray," or "save we beseech thee." The matter could not be stated more plainly; the people were announcing Jesus of Nazareth as their king and deliverer. The declarations that he was David's son—the promise of kingship having been given David's heirs (2 Sam. 7:12-16)—announced him as their king, as did the palm leaves and garments that were strewn before him. Nor was this all, for this very event had been detailed by the prophet Zechariah. "Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Zion," he had written. "Shout, O daughter of Jerusalem: behold, thy King cometh unto thee: he is just, and having salvation; lowly, and riding upon an ass, and upon a colt the foal of an ass." fn (Zech. 9:9.)

 

The implication of this ritual entrance into Jerusalem was not lost on those who witnessed it, for some of the Pharisees among the multitude demanded that he rebuke his disciples and constrain their expressions. To this he responded, "I tell you that, if these should hold their peace, the stones would immediately cry out." (Luke 19:40.)

 

We must not suppose that the honor thus paid to Jesus in this moment of triumph was born of ignorance. The testimony of this multitude of believers would stand as a witness against the city of Jerusalem over which Christ now wept. Luke alone records the event: "When he was come near, he beheld the city, and wept over it, Saying, If thou hadst known, even thou, at least in this thy day, the things which belong unto thy peace! but now they are hid from thine eyes. For the days shall come upon thee, that thine enemies shall cast a trench about thee, and compass thee round, and keep thee in on every side, and shall lay thee even with the ground, and thy children within thee; and they shall not leave in thee one stone upon another; because thou knewest not the time of thy visitation." fn (Luke 19:41-44.)

 

The nation of Judah, with Jerusalem as its chief city, was doomed for rejecting its Messiah, yet as Jesus walked the temple grounds that day before he returned to Bethany, he blessed his disciples. (JST, Mark 11:13.) They, by watchful obedience to his words, would be spared the calamity that was to befall the wicked. (Mark 13:14-16.)

 

Jesus—One Having Authority

 

The holy party returned to Bethany for refuge and rest that Sunday evening. How the night was spent we do not know; perhaps Christ continued his instruction to the Twelve, or perhaps the time was spent in meditation and prayer, or maybe they just rested quietly at the home of Simon the leper. In the scriptural account we are invited to join them again Monday morning as they were en route to the temple. As they walked and talked, Christ saw "afar off" a fig tree "having leaves," to which he went in the obvious expectation of obtaining fruit, so that he and the disciples might take refreshment. The tree, however, was barren. Mark tells us that "the time of figs was not yet," meaning that it was too early in the season for figs to have ripened. Christ, finding the tree to be without fruit, cursed it and then proceeded to the temple. The following morning, when he and the apostles passed that way again, Peter observed that the cursed tree had already "withered away." (Mark 11:12-14, 20-24.)

 

We have no indication that the Savior explained his action to his disciples, nor does the scriptural account offer explanation. Apparently it was left to them, as it has been for us, to discern the purpose of the Master Teacher in so doing. May I suggest that the event combined an ingenious teaching moment with the spirit of prophecy. As I have written elsewhere:

 

All present knew that fig trees bring forth their fruit before their leaves. All were equally aware that it would be some weeks before fig trees normally gave fruit. Yet the profusion of leaves on this tree constituted an announcement that it was laden with fruit. Christ was thus attracted to it. The symbol was perfect—a tree professing fruits and having none standing in the very shadows of the temple where a corrupt priesthood professed righteousness and devotion to Israel's God as they plotted the death of his Son. How better could Christ have typified the rustling leaves of religious pretense that took refuge within the temple walls? And does not such hypocrisy, be it individual or national, merit the disdain and curse of that very authority it mocks?

 

The stage was set, the lesson was most timely, and in the false pretense of the fig tree was to be found perfect typecasting. The moment now belonged to the Master Teacher, who used it to dramatize his power over nature and evidence once again his claim to Messiahship, while making the fig tree a prophetic type of what befalls those who profess his authority and fail to bring forth good fruits. Of such he has said that he will curse them "with the heaviest of all cursings." (D&C 41:1.) fn

 

When Jesus entered the temple, his heart and soul filled with righteous indignation for the manner in which his Father's house, this sacred place of prayer and revelation, was being polluted with the hypocrisy of a corrupt priesthood and a nation that willingly partook of evil fruits offered them. Repeating an action that had introduced his ministry some three years previously (John 2:13-17), he cast out all those who made merchandise of his Father's house, overthrowing "the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves," and telling them they had made "the house of prayer" into "a den of thieves." (Matt. 21:12-13.) "Then, having with physical force driven the wicked from the holy sanctuary, he remained to heal, teach, and receive again from believing disciples a renewal of the same acclaim, hosannas, and vocal acceptance of his divine Sonship, as he previously accepted while entering Jerusalem in triumph." fn

 

That night as Jesus again sought refuge and rest in Bethany, the councils of Beelzebub met in Jerusalem, seeking his destruction. Tuesday morning, as he taught in the temple, the body of his listeners parted to admit a delegation consisting of the chief priests, elders of the Sanhedrin, and learned rabbis. They had devised a scheme to discredit him in the eyes of the people and to show him to be in violation of the Mosaic law. Their question was twofold: By what authority did he preach, and who had given him that authority?

 

This question is most interesting. First, when he had previously cleansed the temple, he was challenged to prove his authority by showing a sign. (John 2:18.) Signs were no longer sought; they had been given in all too great abundance. The previous day these same men had themselves witnessed "the wonderful things that he did." (Matt. 21:15.) The issue now was one of authority to teach the gospel. It was well understood that no one could take that honor unto himself. If Jesus could claim no authority, he would obviously be in conflict with the Mosaic law and would have no right to preach the gospel. On the other hand, should he claim such authority, but not having received it from his questioners or those they represented, he would be accused of blasphemy.

 

Christ responded to their question with a question, assuring them that if they would answer his question, he would most certainly answer theirs. He then asked them by what authority John the Baptist performed baptisms. Was it from heaven or of men? As they huddled together, they quickly realized that if they acknowledged that John's authority came from heaven, they would be condemned for not having recognized it and not having been baptized at his hands. On the other hand, if they said that the Baptist's authority was of men, they would offend the people, "for all [held] John as a prophet." (Matt. 21:26.) Thus they had ensnared themselves in the trap they had laid for the Master, and they were forced to admit that they could not answer. He responded, "Neither tell I you by what authority I do these things." (Matt. 21:27.) His answer was tantamount to saying: "You have your answer; John gave it to you at Bethabara, and my Father confirmed it by his own voice out of heaven when he said at my baptism: 'This is my Beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased. Hear ye him.'" fn

 

Three Parables to the Jews

 

Without explanation of any sort, the scriptural text appears to leave the matter of authority (growing out of the questions put to Christ by the chief priests, scribes, and elders), and has Christ relate the "Parable of the Two Sons." (Matt. 21:28-32.) In fact, the parable skillfully answers the question about authority. It is a simple story about a man with two sons whom he asked to labor in his vineyard. The first son said he would not go but repented and went, while the second son said he would go but did not. The question was, which of the two did the will of their father?

 

The simplicity of the story compelled those to whom it was directed to respond that it was the first son who did his father's will, whereupon Jesus made this application: "Verily I say unto you, That the publicans and the harlots shall go into the kingdom of God before you. For John came unto you in the way of righteousness, and bore record of me, and ye believed him not; but the publicans and the harlots believed him; and ye, afterward, when ye had seen me, repented not, that ye might believe him. For he that believed not John concerning me, cannot believe me, except he first repent. And except ye repent, the preaching of John shall condemn you in the day of judgment." (JST, Matt. 21:31-34.)

 

To those spiritually in tune, the message was plain. The father is God; the first son represents the publicans and harlots who repented of their sins and became faithful followers of Christ; the second son represents the Jewish leaders who professed to be about their Father's business but were in fact cankering in wickedness, refusing the most overwhelming array of evidence ever vouchsafed to mortal men to testify that Jesus was the Christ. John had come to bear witness of Christ; his message was one of righteousness and salvation. The publicans and harlots repented and thus were led by John to Christ. The lawyers and Jewish leaders rejected John and, having done so, could not accept Christ, for John and Christ were one. To accept John and his heaven-sent authority was to accept Christ and his authority; to reject John was to seal the heavens—to reject Christ, and to reject the message and authority of salvation.

 

In the hardness of their hearts and the bitterness of their souls, we witness the abomination that would precede the desolation of both the temple and the nation of the Jews. Here within the very walls of the temple, where every ritual movement had been designed in the councils of heaven to testify of Christ, and every officiator to personify his likeness, those so chosen stood in open rebellion to him. To them he spoke in parables, that their "unrighteousness might be rewarded" to them. (JST, Matt. 21:34.)

 

Christ then related the "Parable of the Wicked Husbandmen," by which those corrupt priests, scribes, Pharisees, and elders pronounced their own judgment. (Matt. 21:33-44.) The parable concerns a householder who planted a vineyard, hedged it, dug a winepress in it, built a tower to protect it, placed it in the trust of husbandmen, and then left for a distant country. At the time of harvest he sent servants to receive the fruits of his vineyard, only to have them beaten or killed in one manner or another. Finally he sent "his son, saying, They will reverence my son. But when the husbandmen saw the son, they said among themselves, This is the heir; come, let us kill him, and let us seize on his inheritance." (Matt. 21:37-38.) Thus they killed the son.

 

Christ asked of his antagonists, "When the lord therefore of the vineyard cometh, what will he do unto those husbandmen?" To that they responded, "He will miserably destroy those wicked men, and will let out his vineyard unto other husbandmen, which shall render him the fruits in their seasons." (Matt. 21:40-41.) By their own mouths, and that too while acting in their official capacity, those corrupt "husbandmen" of Israel had passed judgment upon themselves. According to their own word, they were "wicked men" who ought to be "miserably destroy[ed]" and their stewardship properly given to others. For the third time in a row this contingent of scribes, elders, Pharisees, and chief priests (who but represented their counterparts throughout the nation) had become entangled in their own web and found themselves admitting their own guilt. Let it not be lost upon the reader that in this parable the wicked husbandmen, who had now been identified as the leaders of the Jews, recognized the heir of the Father and knowingly killed him!

 

At this point Jesus asked them if they had not read in the scriptures how it was prophesied that the stone rejected by the builders of the temple would yet be discovered to be the chief cornerstone. fn (Matt. 21:42; Ps. 118:22.) Again the meaning was clear: Jesus of Nazareth was announcing himself to be the Chief Cornerstone in his Father's house and was identifying the spiritually blind and hostile Jewish leaders as the builders who would reject him, along with their nation, until the time of his second coming.

 

Humiliated and angered, these devils cloaked in piety sought to lay hands on Christ but were prevented by his followers. (Matt. 21:46.) Away from their presence, Christ spoke plainly to his disciples, saying, "I am the stone, and those wicked ones reject me. I am the head of the corner. These Jews shall fall upon me, and shall be broken. And the kingdom of God shall be taken from them, and shall be given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof." (JST, Matt. 21:51-53.) Those upon whom the stone fell, he said, would be ground to powder. He extended his prophecy to the last days, when, he said, the vineyard of the Lord would be given to other husbandmen who would render its fruits to the Lord. (JST, Matt. 21:54-56.)

 

Jesus then related a third parable, one commonly known to us as the "Parable of the Royal Marriage Feast." (Matt. 22:1-14.) Jewish tradition had long held that the Messianic era would be ushered in by a great feast, one symbolic of the covenant that would exist between Israel and her Redeemer. In this parable Jesus likened that covenant meal to a royal wedding feast and prophetically announced who the children of the covenant would be.

 

The kingdom of heaven, he said, would be like a king who, having prepared a feast for his son's wedding, sent his servants to summon the guests he had invited, but they would not come. Other servants were sent to tell of all the good and rich things that had been prepared for those invited. Still those whom the king desired to honor would not come, being involved in their own affairs. Some of their number even attacked the king's messengers and killed them. In anger, the king sent an army to destroy the murderers and burn their city. With the wedding feast ready and the guests both unwilling and unworthy to come, the king sent his servants to the highways to invite to the feast all that would come. Many were gathered, "both bad and good: and the wedding was furnished with guests." (Matt. 22:10.) When the king made his appearance, he saw among his guests a man who was not clothed in a wedding garment. Asked why he was not properly dressed, the man was speechless. The king then directed his servants to "bind him hand and foot, and take him away," casting him into "outer darkness," the place of "weeping and gnashing of teeth." Concluding the parable, Jesus said, "Many are called, but few are chosen." (Matt. 22:13-14.)

 

"The interpretation of much of the parable is obvious. The king is God; the son is Christ; the place of the wedding feast is the kingdom of heaven; those bidden to the feast are those to whom the message of the gospel is taken; the servants are obviously the prophets who had been rejected and killed by those of their own nation; the army, it appears, was that of Rome; and the city, Jerusalem. After their rejection by Israel, the servants went to the gentile nations, preaching to all, the righteous and unrighteous alike." fn

 

What is not evident to the modern reader is why a particular dress was required for the king's guests and why the penalty for improper dress was so severe. To those of the Savior's audience, it was well known that one had to be suitably dressed to appear before a king. The apparel of the guest was a reflection of respect for the host. It was also commonly understood that the appropriate dress for such an occasion would be white robes. fn Apparently the people invited from the highways of the earth would have neither time nor means to procure the appropriate wedding clothing, so the king supplied his guests from his own wardrobe, a common practice. Thus all had been invited to clothe themselves in the garments of royalty. The man cast out had chosen to trust in his own dress rather than that provided by the king. "By interpretation, he had chosen to join the true worshippers, that is, the church or kingdom of God, yet he had not chosen to dress as the others had dressed. He was not one with them. He desired the full blessings of the kingdom, but on his own terms, not those of the king. He had spurned the ritual garment and the righteousness associated with it. This is emphasized in the JST, which adds to the statement that 'many are called, but few chosen' the explanation, that 'all do not have on the wedding garment' (JST, Matt. 22:14.)" fn

 

Thus Jesus reminded his listeners of truths long known to them—that the children of the covenant must be found wearing the garments of purity and holiness, garments made white through "the blood of the Lamb." (Rev. 7:14.) John the Revelator would yet write to explain that this "fine linen, clean and white" represented "the righteousness of the saints," and thus the clothing of those "called unto the marriage supper of the Lamb." (Rev. 19:8-9.)

 

In telling this parable, Jesus corrected the tradition of the Jews that they alone would be numbered among the covenant people, and he emphasized that the covenant could be entered into only in purity and righteousness. The Book of Mormon, our most perfect witness of Christ, teaches this doctrine thus: "As many of the Gentiles as will repent are the covenant people of the Lord; and as many of the Jews as will not repent shall be cast off; for the Lord covenanteth with none save it be with them that repent and believe in his Son, who is the Holy One of Israel." (2 Ne. 30:2.)

 

Render to God and Caesar Their Own

 

Hatred makes strange bedfellows. Next we read of the Pharisees striking hands with the Herodians in an attempt to entrap the Savior. Of this event Elder McConkie wrote: "If ever a plot was conceived in hell, born in hate, and acted out with satanic cunning, it was the jointly concocted stratagem of the Pharisees and Herodians on the matter of paying tribute to Caesar." fn The Herodians were Jews who had sold their souls to Herod and, with him, were fawning sycophants of Rome. The Pharisees, on the other hand, were Jews fanatic in their profession of devotion to the law of Moses and the observance of traditions they extorted from it. Between Pharisee and Herodian there was no common ground, yet both were servants of the same master, at whose bidding they now united in the effort to betray the Son of God.

 

This delegation of devils came, as devils so often do, with pretended sincerity and words flowing like a river of praise. "Master," they said, "we know that thou art true, and teachest the way of God in truth, neither carest thou for any man: for thou regardest not the person of men. Tell us therefore, What thinkest thou? Is it lawful to give tribute unto Caesar, or not?" (Matt. 22:16-17.)

 

Their trap was most clever. Were Christ to say, "Yes, pay the hated tax to Rome, as the law requires," the Pharisees would inflame a beleaguered and oppressed people against him. Should he say, "No, God alone is our king, we ought to pay no tribute to a foreign power," the Herodians would have him arrested for sedition and rebellion against the government. "Why tempt me, ye hypocrites?" came the response, evidencing that he had not been beguiled by their flattery. "Shew me the tribute money," he said, and they produced a coin that bore the effigy and name of Tiberius Caesar, emperor of Rome. "Whose is this image and superscription?" Jesus asked. They answered, "Caesar's." Then he said to them, "Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's." (Matt. 22:18-21.)

 

With inspired insight Elder James E. Talmage observed:

 

One may draw a lesson if he will, from the association of our Lord's words with the occurrence of Caesar's image on the coin. It was that effigy with its accompanying superscription that gave special point to His memorable instruction, "Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's". This was followed by the further injunction: "and unto God the things that are God's". Every human soul is stamped with the image and superscription of God, however blurred and indistinct the lines may have become through the corrosion or attrition of sin; and as unto Caesar should be rendered the coins upon which his effigy appeared, so unto God should be given the souls that bear His image. Render unto the world the stamped pieces that are made legally current by the insignia of worldly powers, and give unto God and His service, yourselves—the divine mintage of His eternal realm. fn

 

Resurrection and Marriage in Heaven

 

Perhaps it was by the invitation of Providence that the contending sects of Judaism, whether religious or political, confronted Jesus in the temple this day to challenge his Messiahship. All in turn manifested their murderous hatred, were confounded and silenced, and affirmed their zealous devotion to the Prince of Darkness. The last of their number to do so were the Sadducees, who came baiting Jesus with a question about the resurrection. The scriptural text is at pains to point out that the Sadducees did not believe in a resurrection, so there could be no doubt about the hypocritical nature of their question. Their purpose was to discredit the doctrine of the resurrection through ludicrous, exaggerated circumstance. "Master," their spokesman said, "Moses said, If a man die, having no children, his brother shall marry his wife, and raise up seed unto his brother." (Matt. 22:24.) Now the dilemma: one after another each of his brothers married his wife and died without issue. The question was, to whom would she be married in the resurrection?

 

Christ made two telling points in response. First, he told the Sadducees that the question they asked was the result of their lack of scriptural understanding. Of their number there would be none that would marry or be given in marriage in the resurrection. This is not to say that others cannot marry or be given in marriage in the resurrected state. fn It is to say simply that those who have refused the proper authority by which such marriages are performed cannot lay claim to such blessings. (D&C 132:15-19.) Then Christ showed them the fallacy of their refusing to believe in a resurrection. The God of Moses, through whom they got the law they professed to believe, announced himself as "the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob." (Matt. 22:32.) Yet Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob were dead. How then could Deity be their God unless they continued to live and unless they would arise in the resurrection?

 

The First Great Commandment

 

The Savior's adversaries had been defeated in each of their encounters with him. Had they been wise, they would have acknowledged their defeat and troubled him no more. But the Pharisees, exulting in the immediate discomfiture of the Sadducees, sought to make yet another attempt to discredit him. Huddling in some corner of the temple ground, they continued to plot, this time choosing the most learned of their number, a lawyer (meaning scribe or doctor of the Mosaic law), to approach Christ and submit what appeared to them a most vexing question. It was reckoned by the rabbis that the law contained 613 precepts—248 statements of duty and 365 prohibitions. As to the relative importance of each, they could argue endlessly. Thus the question, "Master, which is the great commandment in the law?" (Matt. 22:36.) In response, Jesus brushed aside the cobwebs of their debate and turned the attention of his hearers to the foundation upon which the law rested, saying: "Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets." (Matt. 22:37-40.)

 

Again the Pharisees had erred, perhaps in this instance in the choice of a questioner, for he appears to have been a man of integrity. "Well, Master," he responded spontaneously, "thou hast said the truth: for there is one God; and there is none other but he: and to love him with all the heart, and with all the understanding, and with all the soul, and with all the strength, and to love his neighbour as himself, is more than all whole burnt offerings and sacrifices." To this Jesus responded, "Thou art not far from the kingdom of God." (Mark 12:32-34.)

 

Whose Son Is the Christ?

 

It was not enough that all quietly slip away impressed that Jesus of Nazareth was a prophet of great wisdom, for he was more than that: he was the Savior of all mankind, and such testimony needed now to be borne. To call attention to his Messiahship, he turned questioner and asked of the Pharisees, "What think ye of Christ? whose son is he?" (Matt. 22:42.) They responded that he would be the son of David and in so doing they illustrated that they sought a temporal deliverer who would wield David's sword, sit upon David's throne, and do the works of David. Jesus retorted by asking why David by the spirit of prophecy referred to the Messiah as Lord, saying, "The Lord said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, till I make thine enemies thy footstool? If David then call him Lord, how is he his son?" (Matt. 22:44-45; cf. Ps. 110:1.)

 

The issue was clearly set: The scribes said that the Messiah was to be David's son, but David by the power of the Holy Ghost called him Lord. Do we properly give such title to children of our own conception? Why did David do so if he were not testifying that the Son would be divine? Could they understand that through his mother Jesus would claim the throne of David, while through his Father he would claim a far greater throne and a far greater power? Such was his testimony of himself, and so great was the spirit of it and the power of his teachings that we read: "No man was able to answer him a word, neither durst any man from that day forth ask him any more questions." (Matt. 22:46.)

 

The Great Denunciation

 

Addressing himself to the multitude but more specifically to his disciples, Jesus then spoke with great plainness about the damning religious hypocrisy that had been so fully displayed that day. "The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat," he said, and "whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not." (Matt. 23:2-3.) Until the Paschal Lamb had been slain, until Jesus the Christ had offered himself as a sacrifice for all, they were to respect the authority that rested in those who controlled the temple and performed its sacred ordinances.

 

This is a lesson of the greatest magnitude, reminiscent of David's refusal to lift his hand against Saul who sought his life, for Saul was the Lord's anointed (1 Sam. 26:9); the Lord had called him and, notwithstanding his wickedness, it was for the Lord to release him. Yet, though the scribes and Pharisees respected the authority of those sitting in "Moses' seat," the people were not to follow their example, for, as Christ said, "they bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and lay them on men's shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers." (Matt. 23:4.) They were masters of religious pomp, making great display of their supposed righteousness and glorying in the honors of their fellow worshipers. As one cannot be saved in falsehood, so one cannot be edified in following bad examples. All are agents unto themselves, and all will be judged for what they have done or failed to do; none will be excused in works of wickedness on the guise that they mistakenly followed the example of false prophets or the unworthy example of hypocritical religious leaders. Christ further warned against those who exalt themselves, for such, he said, "shall be abased; and he that shall humble himself shall be exalted." (Matt. 23:12.) He then burst forth upon the scribes and Pharisees with eight denunciations, which aptly typify the world of religious hypocrisy. They are as follows:

 

First, he condemned those who "shut up the kingdom of heaven," not qualifying themselves and hindering any that would desire to do so. (Matt. 23:13.) Such are those who rejected Jesus as the Christ and the plan of salvation. Today they are found rejecting the testimony that Joseph Smith is a prophet and opposing the message of the restored gospel.

 

Second, he condemned those who hide their greed and meanness under the cloak of piety. Such, he said, "devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayer." (Matt. 23:14.)

 

Third, he denounced missionaries of false faiths who travel over "land and sea to make one proselyte, and when he is made, [they] make him twofold more the child of hell than [themselves.]" (Matt. 23:15.) There is no salvation in false religion, notwithstanding the enthusiasm of its converts.

 

Fourth, he directed condemnation at those who perfect the art of breaking their bond while appearing sanctimonious. (Matt. 23:16-22.) The word or oath of such is nothing more than bait in games of trickery. They are indeed morally blind.

 

Fifth, he denounced the "blind guides" who subverted eternal truths in their excessive zeal for trifles. Exactness in the performance of outward ordinances supplanted for them even an interest in the inward or spiritual meanings intended behind their ritual. They jealously tended to the rituals that testified and taught of Christ at the same time that they rejected and killed him. (Matt. 23:23-24.) Their modern counterparts can be found praising the Bible while rejecting the spirit of revelation from which it sprang, and using it as the justification to reject the testimony of living prophets.

 

The sixth and seventh woes are essentially the same. Here Christ denounced that which is ceremonially clean, while being filthy within. He aptly used the figure of a whited sepulchre filled with decaying bodies to make his point. Commenting on this imagery Elder Talmage wrote:

 

It was an awful figure, that of likening them to whitewashed tombs, full of dead bones and rotting flesh. As the dogmas of the rabbis made even the slightest contact with a corpse or its cerements, or with the bier upon which it was borne, or the grave in which it had been lain, a cause of personal defilement, which only ceremonial washing and the offering of sacrifices could remove, care was taken to make tombs conspicuously white, so that no person need be defiled through ignorance or proximity to such unclean places; and, moreover, the periodical whitening of sepulchers was regarded as a memorial act of honor to the dead. But even as no amount of care or degree of diligence in keeping bright the outside of a tomb could stay the putrescence going on within, so no externals of pretended righteousness could mitigate the revolting corruption of a heart reeking with iniquity. fn

 

The eighth or final woe, which is the crown to all the others, is that they reject the living prophets while they "garnish the sepulchres of the righteous." (Matt. 23:29.) Indeed, to reject the prophet of any age is to reject those of all ages, for all teach the same truths and bear the same witness.

 

Accountability for Their Ancestors' Sins

 

None can be saved alone and none come to this earth without responsibility to others. That responsibility spans generations; thus we are taught that "we without them [those of past dispensations] cannot be made perfect; neither can they without us be made perfect." (D&C 128:18.) Christ applied this principle to those of his day who would reject and kill the prophets. Upon them, he said, would come "all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias." (Matt. 23:35.) fn Thus they would become "accountable for the sins of their fathers who through ignorance rejected the message of salvation. . . . All these could have been freed from their spirit prison by the men of Jesus' day, if those to whom Jesus then preached had believed his words." fn

 

Jesus Laments over Doomed Jerusalem

 

Christ's teaching in the temple ended with his oft-quoted lament over Jerusalem, the city he loved: "O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not! Behold, your house is left unto you desolate." (Matt. 23:37-38.) "Truly Jerusalem's history is like that of no other place; and truly Jesus with cause, wept because of the rebellion of her children." fn

 

NOTES

 

Joseph F. McConkie is associate professor of ancient scripture at Brigham Young University.

 

Footnotes

 

1. All four Gospel writers give an account of this event. (Matt. 21:1-11; Mark 11:1-11; Luke 19:29-40; John 12:12-19.) Matthew's account has the disciples bringing Christ both a colt and its mother. This is not in harmony with the other accounts and is corrected in the Joseph Smith Translation, Matthew 21:5.

 

2. Adam Clarke, Clarke's Commentary, 3 vols. (Nashville: Abingdon, 1977), 1:268. "The mule was the proper riding beast for the king and his sons (2 Samuel 13:29; 18:9)." George Arthur Buttrick, ed., The Interpreter's Bible, 12 vols. (Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1954), 3:26. See also Judges 5:10; 10:4.

 

3. Even this did not constitute the complete fulfillment of Zechariah's prophecy. His prophecy was one of a kingdom of peace, a day when Ephraim and Judah would again be one, a day when that peace (that is, the gospel message) would cover the earth "from sea even to sea, and from the river even to the ends of the earth." (Zech. 9:10.) We look to a future day when that part of the prophecy not fulfilled in Christ's first coming finds completion in the era of millennial rest.

 

4. Literal fulfillment of this prophecy would come in A.D. 70, when Titus and his Roman legion would lay siege to the city, destroy the temple so that not one stone would be left standing upon another, and take into slavery that remnant of his people who did not suffer death in its siege and destruction. Those of his captives who did not die in bondage would eventually be scattered to the ends of the earth.

 

5. Joseph Fielding McConkie, Gospel Symbolism (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1985), pp. 10-11.

 

6. Bruce R. McConkie, Doctrinal New Testament Commentary, 3 vols. (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1965-73), 1:585. See also JST, Matt. 21:13.

 

7. Bruce R. McConkie, The Mortal Messiah, 4 vols. (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1979-81), 3:356.

 

8. These words were part of the Hallel, which all Jewry chanted in their ceremonies. As such, they were well known to those whom the Savior addressed. A tradition among the Jews held that in the building of the temple, one stone was originally rejected by the builders, who did not know for what purpose it had been quarried. Later it was discovered that it was indeed the chief cornerstone. See J. R. Dummelow, A Commentary on the Holy Bible (New York: Macmillan, 1973), p. 372.

 

9. Joseph Fielding McConkie, Gospel Symbolism, p. 132.

 

10. Clarke's Commentary 3:210.

 

11. Gospel Symbolism, pp. 132-33.

 

12. The Mortal Messiah 3:369-70.

 

13. Jesus the Christ (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1957), pp. 546-47.

 

14. This issue has been confused among Latter-day Saints. Critics of Mormonism have frequently used this passage to discount the principle of eternal marriage. A typical response to this criticism has been to agree that there will be no marriage after the resurrection, for all such matters will be attended to prior to that time. Whether that will be the case or not, we have no way of knowing. We should remember, however, that the first resurrection precedes the millennial era, when it is supposed that such matters will be attended to. This passage does not say that there cannot be marriage in the Millennium or at some subsequent time. It simply states that unbelievers, "Sadducees," be they ancient or modern, cannot be sealed for time and eternity. See Robert L. Millet and Joseph Fielding McConkie, The Life Beyond (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1986), pp. 98-100.

 

15. Jesus the Christ, p. 558.

 

16. Jesus here referred to "Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar." This has been thought to be John the Baptist's father, but this tradition of his death comes from a late Christian apocryphal book. (See Robert L. Millet, "The Birth and Childhood of the Messiah," chapter 8 of this volume, note 20.) The idea also finds expression in Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p. 261, which may not have been written by the Prophet. The Zechariah familiar to Jesus' audience was the son of Jehoiada who rebuked Israel and was stoned "in the court of the house of the Lord." (2 Chr. 24:20-22.) The Hebrew Bible arranged Genesis first and Chronicles last, so Jesus probably gave the first and last martyrs in his testimony to the Jews.

 

17. The Mortal Messiah 3:405.

 

18. Doctrinal New Testament Commentary 1:626.

 

 

(Kent P. Jackson and Robert L. Millet, eds., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 5: The Gospels [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1986], 373.)

 

John the Baptist’s mission didn’t take him into Jerusalem, yet all went out to see him in the countryside to watch his baptisms.

 

Matthew 22:9-10 – The gospel will be going to the Gentiles.

 

(Matthew 22:9-10.)

 

 9 Go ye therefore into the highways, and as many as ye shall find, bid to the marriage.

 

10 So those servants went out into the highways, and gathered together all as many as they found, both bad and good: and the wedding was furnished with guests.

 

 

2 Nephi 10:3-22 – Jacob discussed the scattering and gathering of Israel at the temple.

 

 

"We believe in the literal gathering of Israel and in the restoration of the Ten Tribes" (A of F 10). Probably no event of the last days has been prophesied more often than the gathering of Israel. Because of their wickedness, the Lord allowed the children of Israel to be scattered among the nations in the millennium before the birth of Christ as well as afterward, by the hand of Rome. But though they were lost to history, the Lord knows where he placed them, and he ever remembers his promises to restore them to their inheritance.

 

The scattering had two phases. First, the people of Israel turned from God and his gospel and the covenant he had made with them, and their hearts became lost from him. Next, the people of Israel were removed from their land of promise, a symbol of the covenant, and were dispersed among the nations. These phases were prophesied by Moses many centuries before they actually took place. "If thou wilt not hearken unto the voice of the Lord thy God," he said, "to observe to do all his commandments and his statutes which I command thee this day . . . [you will be] removed into all the kingdoms of the earth.½½½ . . . And the Lord shall scatter thee among all people, from the one end of the earth even unto the other; and there thou shalt serve other gods, which neither thou nor thy fathers have known" ( Deut. 28:15,  25,  64; see also Jer. 16:11-13). First came the apostasy of heart—"if thou wilt not hearken unto the voice of the Lord thy God"—the spiritual removal from God's presence. Then came the scattering, the physical removal from the promised land.1

 

The gathering will have the same two phases, restoring that which was lost. First, the people of Israel (and Gentiles who are adopted into the family of Abraham) will receive the opportunity to come unto Christ and his Church. Their hearts will be restored to their true Redeemer. This gathering is a gathering of souls to Zion in the broad sense, to the wards and branches and stakes of the Church in all places throughout the world. Then, in due time, a representative part of those who come unto Christ and his Church will have the opportunity to go to the place called Zion (centered in the New Jerusalem on the American continent, specifically in Missouri); 2 also, in time, those of blood Israel will be restored to their lands of promise. This might be termed a gathering by migration.

 

 Some might say that for Jews the gathering has the same two phases but in reverse: First, they return to the land of their inheritance, the place called Zion (also known as Jerusalem). Then, in time, many will accept the returning Jesus Christ as their Messiah.

 

In truth, though, the gathering of the Jews will follow the same pattern as that of everyone else who comes (or returns) to the covenant. Jacob taught that the Lord "has spoken unto the Jews, by the mouth of his holy prophets, even from the beginning down, from generation to generation, until the time comes that they [the Jews, and by extension, all the house of Israel; see 2 Ne. 9:1] shall be restored to the true church and fold of God; when they shall be gathered home to the lands of their inheritance, and shall be established in all their lands of promise" (2 Ne. 9:2). First, Israel (including the Jews) would be "restored to the true church," after which they would be "gathered home to the lands of their inheritance." The spiritual gathering precedes and leads to the temporal gathering.

 

 Jacob gave the entire pattern of scattering and gathering, in sequence: "Because of their iniquities, destructions, famines, pestilences, and bloodshed shall come upon them [the Jews]; and they who shall not be destroyed shall be scattered among all nations.

 

"But behold, thus saith the Lord God: When the day cometh that they shall believe in me, that I am Christ, then have I covenanted with their fathers that they shall be restored in the flesh, upon the earth, unto the lands of their inheritance. And it shall come to pass that they shall be gathered in from their long dispersion, from the isles of the sea, and from the four parts of the earth; and the nations of the Gentiles shall be great in the eyes of me, saith God, in carrying them forth to the lands of their inheritance" (2 Ne. 10:6-8).

 

First came the iniquity, and then the scattering, followed in some by a return to faith in Christ, which brings them to the true Church, culminating in a restoration to "the lands of their inheritance."

 

 These promises of gathering, both spiritual and temporal, all flow from covenants the Lord made with his people anciently. The people of Israel have always been a covenant people. The covenant stems from the promises made to Abraham that his descendants would be very great in number, that his name would be great on the earth, that "in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed" (Gen. 12:2-3;  13:16). These promises were granted as well to Abraham's son, Isaac (Gen. 26:4), and to Isaac's son Jacob after him (Gen. 28:14). Jacob is the man who became known as Israel (Gen. 32:28). The covenant could be fulfilled only as Abraham's descendants received the priesthood and the gospel.

 

But even though this covenant was a promise to Abraham and his descendants, it was conditioned on righteousness. When Jesus was teaching the unbelieving Jews, he said, "Bring forth . . . fruits meet for repentance: and think not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, that God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham" (Matt. 3:8-9). With the Lord, righteousness is of greater significance than lineage. It follows, then, that those who join Abraham in righteousness will be privileged to join in his covenant. Nephi taught this truth: "As many of the Gentiles as will repent are the covenant people of the Lord; and as many of the Jews as will not repent shall be cast off; for the Lord covenanteth with none save it be with them that repent and believe in his Son, who is the Holy One of Israel" (2 Ne. 30:2). (In this context, Gentiles seems to refer to all who are not Jews.)

 

The gathering is clearly a last days event, one of the signs of the times. Jesus declared that the coming forth of the Book of Mormon was a sign that the gathering was about to begin ( 3 Ne. 20-21). In 1836, seven years after the publication of the Book of Mormon, the keys for gathering all of Israel were restored to Joseph Smith; the gathering thus occurs under the direction of those who have succeeded the Prophet in his presidency. The Prophet recorded, "Moses appeared before us, and committed unto us the keys of the gathering of Israel from the four parts of the earth, and the leading of the ten tribes from the land of the north" (D&C 110:11). Once the keys were restored to the earth, the gathering could begin.

 

 Joseph Smith explained an overriding purpose of the gathering: to tap into the great blessings of combined righteousness. He said: "The greatest temporal and spiritual blessings which always come from faithfulness and concerted effort, never attended individual exertion or enterprise. The history of all past ages abundantly attests this fact. In addition to all temporal blessings, there is no other way for the Saints to be saved in these last days [than by the gathering] as the concurrent testimony of all the holy prophets clearly proves. . . .

 

"It is also the concurrent testimony of all the prophets, that this gathering together of all the Saints, must take place before the Lord comes to 'take vengeance upon the ungodly,' and 'to be glorified and admired by all those who obey the Gospel.'"3

 

In another sermon Joseph Smith connected the gathering to the blessing of temples: "What was the object of gathering the Jews, or the people of God in any age of the world? . . .

 

"The main object was to build unto the Lord a house whereby He could reveal unto His people the ordinances of His house and the glories of His kingdom, and teach the people the way of salvation; for there are certain ordinances and principles that, when they are taught and practiced, must be done in a place or house built for that purpose."4

 

Providing protection for the Saints is another purpose of the gathering. As the Lord said in the early days of the Church, "Verily I say unto you all: Arise and shine forth, that thy light may be a standard for the nations; and that the gathering together upon the land of Zion, and upon her stakes, may be for a defense, and for a refuge from the storm, and from wrath when it shall be poured out without mixture upon the whole earth" (D&C 115:5-6).

 

 

(Donald W. Parry and Jay A. Parry, Understanding the Signs of the Times [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1999], 48 - 49.)

 

The elite were guilty of priestcraft.  In 2 Nephi 26:29, the following definition was given:  priestcraft is the praise of the world but not the welfare of Zion.

 

 

(2 Nephi 26:29.)

 

29 He commandeth that there shall be no priestcrafts; for, behold, priestcrafts are that men preach and set themselves up for a light unto the world, that they may get gain and praise of the world; but they seek not the welfare of Zion.

 

 

Bro. Satterfield put up many pictures in a PowerPoint presentation, showing the size of Jerusalem, the temple courtyard, the walls of the city, where the elite live, where the poor lived.  Etc. . . . They are on his website.

 

Estimates of temple revenue for a month, year, Totaled $1,000,000.   The money went one way; from the peasants to the elite.  It wasn’t distributed to the needy.  The Jewish elite along with the Romans taxed everything, if there was no money than labor was done to pay the fees and taxes.  The temple was a tremendous revenue source.  That’s why the Lord cleansed it.  In the Court of the Women was where all the banking and merchandise were transacted.

 

The peasantry was powerless to stop this, so they formed robber groups who plundered and murdered the rich.  They never picked on the poor, it was like Robin Hood.  The story of the Good Samaritan was about these groups.

 

This wasn’t a democratic society; it was a society of Patron and Client.  The Emperor was the Patron and Herod was a client and down the line, until the poor.

 

The Chief Priests came from 6-7 elite Jewish families.

 

Leviticus 25 and Deuteronomy 15 speaks of caring for the poor, the law was ignored.

 

The reason such a large group went to the garden to arrest Christ was because they thought he was a leader of a robber group!  Yet Christ showed them their own wickedness.

 

Pilate questions Christ if he was a king, the Lord said yes, but not of this world.  Yet the Jews saw Christ as very dangerous to their priestcraft.  He would ruin their game, they wanted him dead.

 

Barabbas was a robber, the head of a group, a social bandit.  The elite fired up the peasants to ask for Barabbas freedom and to crucify Christ between two thieves.  Matthew 27:20-26

 

There were 5 robber groups around Jerusalem in 66 AD, these were the groups in control of Israel, these were the ones the Romans fought and beat.  They took over everything.

 

Dealing with Robbers

 

Good evidence establishes that most legal systems in the ancient Near East distinguished quite specifically between thieves and robbers. fn Under these laws, a thief was usually a local person who stole from his neighbor. The gannab (thief), if apprehended, was dealt with judicially. The local government tried and punished him civilly, most often by a court composed of his fellow townspeople. A robber, on the other hand, was typically an outsider, a brigand or highwayman. Since the gazlan (robber) was not considered a member of the community necessarily entitled to the protections of law, he could be dealt with by military force and martial law. In most instances, it was the army's task to free the countryside of robbers, and the military could execute outlaws summarily. fn

 

Thus, one of the main uses of military force in the ancient Near East was in combating and executing the bands of robbers and brigands who infested the lands. The same was also true in the New World. There is little question that robbers posed serious military threats to the peace and well-being of many ancient cities. Seeing these robbers as military opponents (whatever their political, economic, ideological, or religious motives may have been) is necessary to understand how they were dealt with in the Book of Mormon.

 

How severely robbers were treated in the ancient world seems to have varied with the seriousness of the problem they caused at a particular time and with the ability of the central government to do something about them. fn In the ancient Near East, robbers' raids sometimes involved large-scale destruction. fn Other times they attacked just to restock their supplies or supplement their meager income off the land. fn The military strength of some of these robber groups cannot be doubted: one band nearly captured the city of Alexandria from the Romans. fn They were more threatening than foreign invaders. fn Robbers would often demand ransom or extort money from towns in lieu of ransacking. One text suggests that robber leagues were so common in Egypt that they became entitled by custom to demand ransom equal to one-fourth of the property seized or threatened. fn Josephus accused Albinus of taking kickbacks from brigands. fn

 

The task of clearing the countryside of the menace of robber bands was the responsibility of the local governmental authorities. Thus, for example, the Babylonian Code of Hammurabi distinguishes between saraqu (to steal) fn and habatu (to rob). fn The thief was a common criminal. He could usually be detected and made to pay. But in the case of a robber who was not caught, "the city and the mayor in whose territory or district the robbery has been committed" was obligated to replace whatever had been robbed; and if the victim had been killed, then the city or the mayor had to pay one maneh of silver to the descendant's heirs. fn The Egyptian Report of Wenamun may show this principle in action: Wenamun complained to the Ruler of Dor, "I was robbed in your harbor and since you are the chief of this land and since you are its [investigating] judge—retrieve my money!" Nevertheless, this crime committed on the seas seems to have been outside the jurisdiction of the territorial officer, and Wenamun was left to help himself. fn

 

Thus, a heavy responsibility fell upon the local authorities if a robber—but not a thief—were not caught. The difference seems to rest on the distinctions between "the individual offender and the organized group. . . . Such civic responsibility was an attempt to secure the central authority against attack, and existed in similar situations elsewhere in the ancient world." fn Many Babylonian, Ugaritic, and Phoenician kings left inscriptions boasting that they had successfully eradicated the robbers from their territory, and Ipuwer laments the unsafe conditions in Egypt due to these brigands. fn Related to this sense of civic responsibility for brigandage was the law that a shepherd or carrier was liable for loss from theft, but not for loss to robbers, against whom he was powerless. fn

 

Although the evidence varies regarding capital punishment of thieves in the ancient Near East, it is unequivocal concerning the death penalty for robbers. For example, thieves were executed under the Code of Hammurabi, Sections 6-13 and 21, for several types of theft, such as housebreaking, or stealing from a temple or a palace, or dealing without documentation with a legally disadvantaged person, or concealing stolen goods; but it is not clear that there was a general death penalty for theft under that legal system. The evidence for capital punishment for theft under biblical law is even less conclusive, and possibly nonexistent. For robbers, however, the Code of Hammurabi, Section 22, clearly imposed capital punishment. fn In Egypt, the death penalty applied even if a person could not prove that he had come by his wealth through an honest livelihood, presumably as opposed to having stolen it. fn In early Roman law, the penalty for robbery was "the interdict of fire and water"; under Tiberius, the penalty became deportation; and for ordinary grassatores (highwaymen), the punishment was sometimes death. fn The mode of punishment in at least one case was crucifixion. fn Decapitation by the sword also seems to have been a likely mode of execution. fn

 

Finally, the leaders of robber bands were treated especially notoriously. Josephus reports that Herod put to death a robber-chief named Ezekias, who headed a "large horde," fn and records the arrest of another brigand-chief Eleazar, who was sent to Rome for trial even though he was not a Roman citizen. fn We do not know why Eleazar was sent to Rome; perhaps it was for public humiliation, execution, or display as part of a triumph.

 

 

(Stephen D. Ricks and William J. Hamblin, eds., Warfare in the Book of Mormon [Salt Lake City and Provo: Deseret Book Co., Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies, 1990], 86.)

 

Isaiah 53 – The dry ground was this time period in Israel history.

 

The Savior showed great courage to openly declare who he was and what would happen if the people didn’t repent.

 

 

 

 

M E R I D I A N     M A G A Z I N E

Lesson 20
"Woe unto You...Hypocrites"
John 21-23, John 12:1-8

by Bruce Satterfield, Brigham Young University - Idaho

The Temple

In Matthew 21-23, we see the final confrontation between the Savior and the religious leaders of the Jewish people in Jerusalem. The confrontation takes place within the Temple precinct. The Temple of Herod was the spiritual center of Judaism during the time of Christ. Though the Synagogue grew in importance during this time, the Temple remained at the heart of Jewish worship for it was only in the Temple that the sacrifices required by the law of Moses could be performed. The Temple was also the focus of the activities of the three major feasts and pilgrimages of the law of Moses: the Passover, Pentecost, and Tabernacles. Indeed, the whole of the law of Moses had the Temple at its core.

The Temple was built upon a hill that was biblically known as Mt. Moriah. It was to here that Abraham brought Isaac to be offered as a sacrifice to the Lord (Gen. 22:2). Surrounding the Temple were several courts. The Temple with its several courts was enclosed by a large massive retaining wall. All together, the Temple, the courts, and the large outer wall were known as the Temple Mount-the Hebrew term for the Temple Mount is literally "the mountain of the house."

The following is a picture of the Temple Mount as reconstructed in the Holy Land Hotel in Jerusalem, Israel.
 

View of the Temple Mount as has been reconstructed in the Holy Land Hotel (Jerusalem, Israel) model of Jerusalem during the second temple period - time of Christ.

 

Description of Temple

Generally, Israelite worshipers entered the Temple Mount from stairs ascending through the southern wall into the Court of the Gentiles. Referencing the Palestinian Talmud, Safrai has noted: "Everyone, priest or layman, took a ritual bath, even if he were clean, before entering the Temple." This could be done in the ritual baths associated with the Temple, especially those located next to the southern entrance of the Temple. Safrai also states: "It was customary for visitors to the Temple to wear white rather than coloured clothing, for the former was held to indicate modesty and piety: pious people were careful always to wear white. Before entering the Temple courts they removed their shoes, and laid aside their staffs, their money belts, their cloaks and bundles." (1)

The stairs leading up from the triple gate opened into a large open court known as the Court of the Gentiles. As the Salt Lake Temple is surrounded by Temple Square, so this court surrounded the Temple proper (which included the inner courts and Sanctuary) and received its name from the fact that gentiles could proceed no closer to the Temple proper than this court.

Surrounding the Court of the Gentiles were porticoes two columns deep and each 25 cubits high upon which lay a flat roof. The rituals associated with the Mosaic Law were not performed in the Court of the Gentiles; "rather, its colonnades served as a gathering place for the people before and after worship, or for those who ascended the Temple Mount to hear the words of the Law. . . Business transactions relating to the Temple, as for example the purchase of sacrificial doves, oils, wines, and even the money changing, were not conducted in the inner courts but rather on the outer court of the Temple Mount . . ." (2)

The Temple proper was separated from the Court of the Gentiles by a balustrade that was chest-high. There were gates through which patrons passed in order to proceed to the inner courts and the sanctuary itself. By each gate there was a sign warning Gentiles not to pass any further. Archaeology has uncovered one of these warning notices which states: "No foreigner is to enter within the forecourt and the balustrade around the sanctuary. Whoever is caught will have himself to blame for his subsequent death."

Beyond the balustrade preventing gentiles from passing lay the Temple proper (or sanctuary) with its several courts. The following is a picture of the Temple and the immediate surrounding courts as reconstructed in the Temple model at the Holy Land Hotel.
 
 

Herod's Temple and its Immediate Courtyards (Holy Land Hotel, Jerusalem)

 

The square court in the foreground was known as the Treasury or the Court of Women so named because women could pass no further than this area. The main entrance into the Court of Women was through the eastern gate which was gold and silver plated. Secondary doors lay on the north and south. It was in this court that the woman found in adultery was brought before the Savior (John 8).

On the western end of the Court of Women was a flight of 15 stairs in a semicircle that led to the Gate of Nicanor (also known as the "Beautiful Gate" - Acts 3:2,10). Beyond this gate was the Court of the Israelites followed by the Court of the Priests, which immediately surrounded the Temple. Within the Court of the Priests was the Temple. In the forecourt of the Court of the Priests between the Court of Men and the Sanctuary was the massive Altar of Burnt Offerings upon which all animal sacrifices were offered. Between the altar and the sanctuary was the large laver where the priests washed their hands and feet. North of the altar was the slaughtering area for the animal sacrifices.

The most imposing feature of the Temple Mount was the sanctuary or Temple proper. It was no less than a hundred cubits high. The structure was divided into three rooms: the vestibule, the Holy Place, and the Holy of Holies.

On the northwest corner of the Temple Mount (seen on the left of the first picture) was the commanding four towered Antonia Fortress, the Roman garrison. This may have been the Praetorium mentioned in the gospels (Mark 15:16) where Jesus was taken before Pilate (the other location proposed by scholars was Herod's palace on the western side of the upper city). Luke referred to this structure as the castle (Acts 21:34, 37; 22:24; 23:10). It was set higher than any other structure in Jerusalem in order for the Romans to keep a watchful eye upon all Jerusalem
 

Chief Priests and Scribes

The New Testament phrase for those who directed the affairs of the Temple is "chief priests and scribes." The chief priests consisted of (1) the high priest, who was always from the Sadducean party, (2) the captain of the Temple, (3) the director of the weekly course, (4) the director of the daily course, (5) the temple overseer, and (6) the treasurer. These were all permanent appointments. Under their direction, the rest of the priests and levites were divided into various courses that served in the temple twice a year for a week at a time.

One of the chief duties of the Temple administration was the collection tithes and offerings necessary for Temple worship. This included the annual tithe, offerings of grain and wine, wood for the sacrifices, and often a second tithe. In actuality, the economic demands of the Temple were extraordinary.
 

"A Den of Thieves"

It appears that by the time of Christ, the Temple had been turned into a very lucrative priestcraft by the Jewish religious leaders. As we shall presently see, it was the Savior's intention to attack this priestcraft, knowing full well what the consequences would be. In the Book of Mormon, Jacob prophesied what effect the Savior's confrontation with the Jewish leaders would have: "But because of priestcrafts and iniquities, they at Jerusalem will stiffen their necks against him, that he be crucified" (2 Ne. 10:5). A brief discussion of some of what is known of this priestcraft is pertinent to the study of Matthew 21-23.

In the ancient world there was no separation between church and state. Both state and religion were controlled by the "elite," mainly the aristocracy and priests. In Judea and Galilee, the elite made up a very small minority of the population, only 5%. The non-elite, the peasants, did not elect their leaders, rather leadership was either inherited or appointed by the Romans. The economic funding of both the Roman empire as well as local administrations came primarily from the peasantry.

The tax obligation among the Jewish peasantry was both extreme and oppressive. Besides the Roman taxes, the peasants were taxed by the Temple hierarchy-"the chief priests and scribes." These taxes were many. There was the annual tithe that was collected by local priests for the use and upkeep of the temple. In addition to this, the peasants were to supply Temple with animals, wine, and grain for sacrifices. There were also land taxes, personal vows, the ½ shekel per year tax, and so forth. The amount of taxes the peasants paid to both Rome and Temple were at least 40% of their productivity-in many cases much more!

Often the peasants grumbled about this intolerable situation. To handle the unsatisfied majority, the minority, the Jewish elite, kept the peasantry in control through indebtedness. Hanson and Oakman have observed: "Control of peasant labor was effected in ancient agrarian societies by heavy demands for taxes, rents, and debt-repayments. Peasants did not voluntarily supply labor for elites, nor did they work willingly for wages. Most traditional peasants are as devoted to self-sufficient household economy as elites are to the welfare of their estates. Since elities need to control the labor of peasants without frequent recourse to military force, exorbitant taxation and debt contracts backed up by a judicial authority come into play." (3)

Consequently, associated with the Temple hierarchy was the Jerusalem Sanhedrin-the ruling Jewish authority and high court of the land. They enforced the debts contracted by the "chief priests and scribes" upon the peasantry. The Sanhedrin was made up of about 70-71 men consisting of Sadducees, Pharisees, Priests, and Elders. Always, the chief priests including the High Priest were part of the Sandhedrin. In fact, the High Priest was always the head of the Sandhedrin.

Through taxation backed up by the Sanhedrin, "the powerful kept peasants and villages under a constant barrage of demands and obligations-perennially in debt, if possible. When peasants eventually got too far behind, they lost direct access to their traditionally held land." (4)

Richard Horsely explained: "If a peasant family, after rendering up 40 percent or more of its harvest, then had too little left to survive until the next harvest, it would have to borrow grain for food, or for seed for the next sowing. Family members may already have tried to hire themselves out as wage labor to a larger landholder. . . Under such economic pressures, with too little produced to meet the demands both for subsistence and for surpluses, the peasants were forced to borrow. Continued borrowing would increase a family's debt significantly, with a great risk of complete loss of land. One would then sink into the ranks of the rural proletariat, the landless day laborers, or one could become a sharecropping tenant, perhaps on one' own former parcel of land." (5)

How did the peasants feel about this? "They depended upon the temple and priests for regulating their lives with God and for ensuring the fertility of the land. On the one hand, the temple held power for them. Only if the priests satisfied God's demands would things be well with weather, soil, and crops. . . When the priestly opera (rituals) are done, God supplies the goods of life. . . On the other hand, the temple held power over them as peasants chafed under God's (and God's representatives') demands." (6)

At least, this is how the chief priests presented the role of the Temple to the peasants. The law of Moses was used to justify this situation for the law demanded that ritual impurities or sins be rectified through sacrifices performed in religious sanctuaries. For the first several hundred years of Israelite history, legitimate sanctuaries were found throughout Israel. However, during the time of King Josiah (c. 640-608 B.C.), the place of sacrifice had been centralized to the Jerusalem temple alone. Josiah did this to control heathen worship which had spread among the Jews.

After Josiah's death, the Temple hierarchy began to misuse the religious practices of the law of Moses (as well as practices of heathen gods!) for their own gain. It was, in part, this priestcraft that Jeremiah had reference when he declared in his great temple sermon: "Is this house, which is called by my name, become a den of robbers in your eyes?" (Jeremiah 7:11). Indeed, Ezekiel prophesied against these "shepherds of Israel" in these words: "Thus saith the Lord GOD unto the shepherds; Woe be to the shepherds of Israel that do feed themselves! should not the shepherds feed the flocks?" (Ezek. 34:2). Because of this wickedness, the Lord allowed Jerusalem's destruction by the Babylonians.

At the time of Christ, the Jewish leaders forgot the folly of their forefathers. Once again, the "shepherds of Israel" began to "feed themselves" at the expense of the sheep. Through the guise of religion, the shepherds-"the chief priests and scribes"-"correlated sin and debt such that a constant flow of goods to the temple center remained under the control of the high priestly families." Further, "the elites" began "acquiring money through debt and mercantile involvements, gaining power over peasants through loans, controlling more land through debt defaults, and directing enormous agricultural products to their own advantage." (7)

A consequence of this nefarious situation the first century A. D. saw much social unrest among the peasants. The years preceding and following the Savior's ministry were plagued with many uprisings, particularly instigated by groups of bandits. Social banditry became an affliction in Jewish society. Because many of the peasants lost their land to the elite through indebtedness, they were forced to find other means to survive. Consequently, many turned to banditry. Similar to Robin Hood, they formed groups with leaders and lived in the desert, often in caves or dens, making raids upon both the Jewish and Roman wealthy. Most often, these were very wicked people, resembling more like Gadianton robbers than Robin Hood. They became so powerful and numerous that they were a major force behind the Jewish revolt against the Romans in 66 A.D. which ended in Jerusalem's destruction in 70 A.D.

Banditry was a constant source of trouble for both the Roman and Jewish elite. Often, the military was sent out to try to round up and extinguish these robbers. In fact, just prior to the Savior's last week of his life, the leader of one such robber group, with two of his henchmen, was captured by the Romans. The robber leader was named Barabbas. His two henchmen were crucified with the Savior.

But the system that perpetrated the social unrest of the first century was in itself banditry. "The temple system as it had developed in the Herodian period within agrarian social structures was oppressive and perceived by many (especially peasants, upon whom rested the primary burden of the tribute) as 'banditry.'" (8) It is in this setting that the Savior called the Temple a "den of thieves."
 

Cleansing of the Temple

The Savior began the last week of his life by confronting the religious leaders of the Jews choosing to attack to attack at the heart of their wicked priestcraft--the Temple.

Having arrived at Jerusalem, the Savior entered the city riding the colt of an ass. To the amazement of the reader, the multitude who had gathered for Passover greeted him with the exultant cry of "Hosanna to the Son of David." Those who for the first time looked upon the Savior, asked, "Who is this?" The multitude responded, "This is Jesus the prophet of Nazareth of Galilee" (Matt. 20:1-11).

Matthew sees in the triumphal entry, the fulfillment of two Old Testament prophecies (Isaiah 62:11 and Zechariah 9:9): "Tell ye the daughter of Sion, Behold, thy King cometh unto thee, meek, and sitting upon an ass, and a colt the foal of an ass." The ass was an animal of peace and not one of war. Though the multitudes may have saw in Jesus a king who would throw off the shackles of their Roman overlords, he had in fact not come as a warrior. He had come as the Prince of Peace.

The Savior proceeded to the Temple Mount. As he came into the Court of the Gentiles, he came into the heart of the priestcraft. He saw those who sold sacrificial animals to pilgrims who had come great distances to participate in temple worship. He saw those who exchanged foreign currency into the local currency, the only currency accepted to pay the obligatory temple tax.

On the surface, these may have been considered legitimate and necessary practices. It was not practical for those traveling great distances to bring their own sacrifices. Nor would they have carried with them the local currency for the temple tax. Yet, these practices need not be done on the Temple Mount! Further, it appears that those who sold sacrifices and changed money were doing it at an exorbitant rate. That this took place is evidenced in rabbinical writings. We are told: "It once happened in Jerusalem that a pair of pigeons cost a golden denar [equal to 25 silver denars]. Rabban Simon ben Gamaliel said, 'By this Temple! [a form of oath] I will not rest this night before a pair of pigeons are sold at a silver denar." (9)(Mishnah Kerithoth 1:7)

The Savior found these practices repulsive. He then "cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves" declaring, "It is written, My house shall be called the house of prayer; but ye have made it a den of thieves" (Matt. 21:12-13).

Certainly, the activities in the Court of the Gentiles did not represent the whole priestcraft. But by clearing out these obvious money-making activities, the Savior was making a stand against the priestcraft activities of the Temple as a whole.

After sanctifying the Temple, "the blind and the lame came to him in the temple; and he healed them" (Matt. 21:14). Upon seeing these things, the chief priests and scribes, "who were sore displeased," chided the Savior because the crowds had hailed him as the Son of David (Matt. 21:15-16). This scene reflects the hard heartedness of the Jewish rulers and sets the stage for climatic ending of Matthew's gospel!
 

The Cursing of the Fig Tree

After the Savior spent the night in the small neighboring village of Bethany (Matt. 21:17), he returned to Jerusalem. He passed along the way a fig tree that was full of leaves but was barren of fruit (Matt. 21:18-22). This is unusual. One of the unique characteristics of a fig tree is that when it puts forth leaves, it puts forth fruit at the same time. (10) Therefore, if one saw a fig tree with leaves, he would expect to see fruit as well. But the fig tree bore no fruit. In a horrific display of his power, the Savior cursed the fig tree and it immediately "withered away."

The tree was cursed because it did not produce fruit. Of this Spencer W. Kimball said, "The symbolism of the barren fig tree (Matt. 21:19) is eloquent. The unproductive tree was cursed for its barrenness." (11) John the Baptist had warned the Jews, "the axe is laid unto the root of the trees: therefore every tree which bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire" (Matt. 3:10). Likewise, the Savior said, "Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire" (Matt. 7:19). In other words, if the Jews did not produce works acceptable to God, they would be destroyed. To this point in his ministry, the Savior had only displayed the positive nature of his power: the power to heal, give life, and do good. In cursing the barren fig tree, the Savior demonstrated his power to curse, smite, and destroy. In so doing, it foreshadowed the fate of those of the Jewish nation who would reject the ministry of Jesus.
 

Confrontation Between Jesus and the Rulers

Matthew's inclusion of the cursing of the fig tree sets the stage for the confrontation between the Savior and the Jewish leaders (21:23-22:46). The Savior came to the temple where he began teaching the people. "The chief priests and the elders of the people"-i.e., the Sanhedrin-came to him and questioned him: "By what authority doest thou these things? and who gave thee this authority?" What "these things" had reference to is unstated. Certainly it must have included the clearing of the Temple but probably also included the triumphal entry, the healings, as well as teaching.

"The question, of course, is a challenge. They are not asking for information about him; they know that he has not authority (in their sense of the word) to act as he has been doing. The temple was under the jurisdiction of the Sanhedrin, which they represented; the merchants and the money-changers exercised their trades under concessions granted by the Sanhedrin. They knew without asking that no authority had been granted to Jesus to interfere with the existing arrangements." (12)

They placed the Savior in a difficult situation. "It follows that were Jesus to answer, 'I do these things by human authority', he would contradict his own bold behavior, but that were he to answer, 'I do these things by divine authority', he would be laying explicit public claim to messianic status . . ." (13)

In response to the challenge issued by the rulers, the Savior said that if they would tell him where John the Baptist received his authority to baptize, he would tell them where he had received his authority. But "they reasoned with themselves, saying, If we shall say, From heaven; he will say unto us, Why did ye not then believe him? But if we shall say, Of men; we fear the people; for all hold John as a prophet." So they replied, "We cannot tell." To which the Savior said, " Neither tell I you by what authority I do these things" (21:23-27). "These were men who had been asked a question to which they knew the answer, but who refused to give it because they were afraid of the consequences. Why should a teacher like Jesus answer the loaded questions of men like these?" (14)
 

Three Parables

Though the Savior did not answer the question the rulers asked, He did respond to their challenge by delivering three parables. The meaning of these parables is clear: the rejection of Jesus by the Jews would eventually lead to their destruction and the destruction of Jerusalem!
 

Parable of the Two Sons

In the first of the three parables (Matt. 21:28-32), the hard hearts of the rulers were contrasted to the open hearts of the "publicans and harlots" who had come to believe on him. The Savior began the parable by asking the rulers a question: "But what think ye?" Then followed the parable: A farmer asked his two sons to go work in the fields. The first said, "I will not: but afterward he repented, and went." Then the second said, "I go, sir: and went not."

The Savior then continued the question he had started the parable with, "Whether of them twain did the will of his father?" The answer was obvious, the first son! After the Jewish leaders gave the right answer, the Savior gave this stunning rebuke: "Verily I say unto you, That the publicans and the harlots go into the kingdom of God before you. For John came unto you in the way of righteousness, and ye believed him not: but the publicans and the harlots believed him: and ye, when ye had seen it, repented not afterward, that ye might believe him."

The interpretation of the parable is simple. The first son represented the publicans and harlots who had lead sinful lives. However, upon hearing the gospel taught by Christ, they repented of their past actions. The second son represented the Pharisees and scribes. They would not repent upon hearing the message of the gospel.
 

Parable of the Wicked Husbandman

Following upon the heel of the Savior's reprimand, the Savior told them the parable of the householder (21:33-44). "A certain householder" who owned a vineyard rented his land to "husbandmen." They would take care of the vineyard and reap the rewards. Often, in circumstances such as presented in the parable, rent payment was a certain percentage of the harvest. As harvest time drew near, the householder sent his servants to collect the percentage of the harvest that belonged to him. But "the husbandmen took his servants, and beat one, and killed another, and stoned another." The householder sent other servants but the same fate befell them. Finally, he sent his own son hoping that "They will reverence my son." However, when the son came, the husbandmen "said among themselves, This is the heir; come, let us kill him, and let us seize on his inheritance." They carried out their foul plan. The Savior then asked the rulers what the householder would do to the husbandmen. Properly, they responded, "He will miserably destroy those wicked men, and will let out his vineyard unto other husbandmen, which shall render him the fruits in their seasons."

The meaning of the parable is obvious. Throughout their history, Jewish rulers had rejected the prophets of the Lord. But God had now sent is own Son. Nonetheless, the rulers would reject him as well. The parable suggests the motive for their rejection. The husbandman said: "This is the heir; come, let us kill him, and let us seize on his inheritance." As explained previously, Jacob, in the Book of Mormon, explained that the rejection of Christ by the Jews was "because of priestcrafts and iniquities" (2 Ne. 10:5). The rulers were using the Lord's kingdom administered through the law of Moses, whom Christ was the legal heir, as a priestcraft. The coming of Christ was seen by these rulers as an interruption of their priestcraft.

Not only did the Savior prophesy his own demise in this parable, but warned that because of the Jewish rejection of Christ the Jewish nation including their capital, Jerusalem, would suffer destruction. Further, he prophesied that the gentiles would be given the opportunity to have the gospel.
 

The Stone Rejected

Before proceeding to the third parable, the Savior continued his warning of the impending destruction of the Jewish nation. "Did ye never read in the scriptures," he said, "The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner: this is the Lord's doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes?" (Matt. 21:42). This quotation from Psalms 118:22, speaks of the rejection of the Messiah, the stone of Irsael. He warned them that because they would reject him, the stone of Israel, "The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof" (Matt. 21:43). The "nation" spoken of was an illusion to the gentiles. He then said, perhaps pointing to himself, "And whosoever shall fall on this stone shall be broken: but on whomsoever it shall fall, it will grind him to powder" (Mat. 21:44).

The JST adds: "And they said among themselves, Shall this man think that he alone can spoil this great kingdom? And they were angry with him" (JST Matt. 21:48). Though they wanted to "lay hands on him" they thought better "because they learned that the multitude took him for a prophet" (JST Matt. 21:49).

The JST continues the story adding further insight. "And now his disciples came to him, and Jesus said unto them, Marvel ye at the words of the parable which I spake unto them? Verily, I say unto you, I am the stone, and those wicked ones reject me. I am the head of the corner. These Jews shall fall upon me, and shall be broken. And the kingdom of God shall be taken from them, and shall be given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof; (meaning the Gentiles.) Wherefore, on whomsoever this stone shall fall, it shall grind him to powder. And when the Lord therefore of the vineyard cometh, he will destroy those miserable, wicked men, and will let again his vineyard unto other husbandmen, even in the last days, who shall render him the fruits in their seasons. And then understood they the parable which he spake unto them, that the Gentiles should be destroyed also, when the Lord should descend out of heaven to reign in his vineyard, which is the earth and the inhabitants thereof" (JST Matt. 21:50-56
 

The Parable of the Wedding Garment

The Savior then delivered a third parable: the parable of the wedding garment (Matt. 22:1-14). In the parable, a king "made a marriage for his son." "When the marriage was ready" (JST 22:3), the king sent forth his servants to tell those who had been invited to the wedding to "come unto the marriage." "But they made light of the servants, and went their ways; one to his farm, another to his merchandise; And the remnant took his servants, and entreated them spitefully, and slew them" (JST Matt. 22:5-6). When the king heard how his servants were treated, "he was wroth: and he sent forth his armies, and destroyed those murderers, and burned up their city." The king said, "The wedding is ready, but they which were bidden were not worthy. Go ye therefore into the highways, and as many as ye shall find, bid to the marriage." The servants did as they were commanded: they "went out into the highways, and gathered together all as many as they found, both bad and good: and the wedding was furnished with guests."

The parable could have ended here with the point being made. However, there is second point the Savior wished to make. "When the king came in to see the guests, he saw there a man which had not on a wedding garment." We do not know enough about wedding ceremonies during the time of Christ to understand the cultural aspect of this portion of the parable. But either a wedding garment was given to those invited to the wedding or at least suitable clothing was made available. Whatever is the case, it is apparent that having the wedding garment was essential for the wedding feast. The king asked, "Friend, how camest thou in hither not having a wedding garment?" Perhaps in the rush of filling the wedding with guests, the man was not able to get a garment or none was given him. But the man "was speechless." That is, he had been given the opportunity to receive the garment but did not take it. "Then said the king to the servants, Bind him hand and foot, and take him away, and cast [him] into outer darkness; there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth." The Savior concluded the parable saying, "For many are called, but few chosen." The JST adds, "wherefore all do not have on the wedding garment" (JST Matt. 22:14).

The King represents God, the Father. The king's son is Christ. The wedding feast represents Christ's coming among the Jews. The marriage metaphor was common metaphor used in the Old Testament to represent the covenant relationship between God and Israel. (15)

The parable has two points. The first is more obvious than the second. The first point is a reiteration of the last parable: because the Jews rejected the Lord's servants, they would be destroyed and the gospel would be taken to the gentiles.

The second point focuses on preparation. Those who have been called to the wedding feast were given a special garment to wear at the feast. As the king looked over the hastily bidden guests, he spied a man not wearing the wedding garment. What was the garment? We are not told. But it is apparent that without the garment, one was not prepared to enjoy the wedding festivities.

Of this, Joseph Smith stated: " . . . the day of the Lord fast approaching when none except those who have won the wedding garment will be permitted to eat and drink in the presence of the Bridegroom, the Prince of Peace!" (16) The wedding garment represents personal preparedness for the Lord's coming. Elder Bruce R. McConkie stated: "Salvation is a personal matter; it comes to individuals, not congregations. Church membership alone does not save; obedience after baptism is required. Each person called to the marriage feast will be examined separately, and of the many called to partake of the bounties of the gospel few only will wear the robes of righteousness which must clothe every citizen in the celestial heaven. True it is that the Lord "hath bid his guests," as Zephaniah said, but "all such as are clothed with strange apparel" shall be cast out. (Zeph. 1:7-8.)" (17) Again, he wrote: "He had accepted the invitation (the gospel); joined with the true worshipers (come into the true Church); but had not put on the robes of righteousness (that is, had not worked out his salvation after baptism)."
 

Render Unto Caesar

The Jewish leaders were frustrated by the Savior's response to their question of authority. Matthew records that hearing the Savior's response to the Sanhedrin, "Then went the Pharisees, and took counsel how they might entangle him in his talk."

The devised another plan. They approached the Savior with another question in order to trap the Savior. They took with them the Herodians, those who desired to see the family line of Herod regain power in Jerusalem. They questioned the Savior in this manner: "Master, we know that thou art true, and teachest the way of God in truth, neither carest thou for any man: for thou regardest not the person of men. Tell us therefore, What thinkest thou? Is it lawful to give tribute unto Caesar, or not?" (Matt. 22:16-17).

The tribute under question was the poll tax which was an especially unpopular tax. The poll tax was not a tax dealing with merchandise in any way. "Customs duties were disliked, but at least on paying them on go something, the right to take goods to their destination. But with the poll tax there was no such benefit. It was a tax that simply removed money from the citizen and transferred it to the emperor's coffers with no benefit to the citizen." (18)

The question was framed in such a way as to be answered with "Yes" or "No." If he answered "Yes", he would please the Herodians but the Jewish populas would be upset. On the other hand, if he answered "No", he would not find disfavor with the Jews but he would with the Romans.

However, "Jesus perceived their wickedness, and said, Why tempt ye me, ye hypocrites? Shew [pronounced 'show' in old English] me the tribute money. And they brought unto him a penny. And he saith unto them, Whose is this image and superscription? They say unto him, Caesar's. Then saith he unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's" (Matt. 22:18-21).

The Savior's response has become a classic. That which belongs to the government should be rendered and that which belongs to God should be rendered. President N. Eldon Tanner has reminded us: "There is no reason or justification for men to disregard or break the law or try to take it into their own hands. Christ gave us the great example of a law-abiding citizen when the Pharisees, trying to entangle him, as the scriptures say, asked him if it were lawful to give tribute money unto Caesar. After asking whose inscription was on the tribute money, and their acknowledgment that it was Caesar's, he said: 'Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's.' (Matt. 22:21.) It is the duty of citizens of any country to remember that they have individual responsibilities, and that they must operate within the law of the country in which they have chosen to live." (19)
 
 
 

Marriage and the Resurrection

When the Pharisees and Herodians heard the Savior's response, "they marvelled, and left him, and went their way" (Matt. 22:22). But then the Sadducees decided to get into this confrontation with the Savior. They tried to trick the Savior by placing before him a situation regarding levirate marriage. Levirate marriage was "The custom of a widow marrying her deceased husband's brother or sometimes a near heir." (20) Levirate marriage was practiced in the Bible and discussed in Deuteronomy 25:5-10.

The Sadducees posed the situation of a woman who had been married and her husband died leaving her no children. According to levirate marriage, a brother could marry her to raise up children for his dead brother. In the situation posed by the Sadducees, the woman was married to her husband's brother. But he died and so she was married to the next brother. He likewise died and so she was married to the third brother "unto the seventh" or last brother. The question the Sadducees posed was, "in the resurrection whose wife shall she be of the seven?"

The Savior responded, "Ye do err, not knowing the scriptures, nor the power of God. For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven" (Matt. 22:23-30). Of this, Elder James E. Talmage wrote: "The Lord's meaning was clear, that in the resurrected state there can be no question among the seven brothers as to whose wife for eternity the woman shall be, since all except the first had married her for the duration of mortal life only. … In the resurrection there will be no marrying nor giving in marriage; for all questions of marital status must be settled before that time, under the authority of the Holy Priesthood, which holds the power to seal in marriage for both time and eternity." (21)
 

The Great Commandment

Perhaps one of the most important things to come out of the confrontation of this day occurred after the Pharisees saw that the Sadducees had been silenced. They gathered around the Savior to continue the "Pharisaic inquisition." In one last attempt to trap the Savior into making a public blunder in hopes to discredit Him, they asked him one last question: "Master, which is the great commandment in the law?" (Matt. 22:35-36)

The Rabbis had separated out 613 commandments in the law. Further, they had divided these commandments into light and weighty (cf. Matt. 23:23). "They did not mean that some commandments were so slight that they could be neglected. All the commandments were God's, and therefore all were to be treated with full seriousness. But obviously some commandments were more important than others . . ." (22) The question they posed was which did the Savior regard as the greatest of them all. "There is no objective yardstick for measuring one commandment against another, so that whatever commandment Jesus selected for the first place would certainly have been placed lower by others." (23) Thus a debate could ensue in which the Pharisees hoped they could discredit the Savior.

His answer is very instructive for all of God's children. He took two separate statements, one found Deuteronomy (6:5) and the other in Leviticus (19:18), and tied them together. "Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself." He then added, " On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets" (Matt. 22:37-40).

The Savior's response was brilliant and to the point. For the Pharisees, as well as for many of us today, the laws of God had been reduced to a series of "do's" and "don'ts" that ought to be followed. But as Elder Dallin H. Oaks has taught: "the Final Judgment is not just an evaluation of a sum total of good and evil acts-What we have done. It is an acknowledgment of the final effect of our acts and thoughts-What we have become. It is not enough for anyone just to go through the motions. The commandments, ordinances, and covenants of the gospel are not a list of deposits required to be made in some heavenly account. The gospel of Jesus Christ is a plan that shows us how to become what our Heavenly Father desires us to become." (24)
 

The commands to Love God and our fellow man are not part of the list of commandments we ought to follow. Rather, they provide the motivation, the intent, or the purpose behind every commandment found in scripture or from the words of the prophets.

When we honestly evaluate our actions associated with the Lord's Kingdom, we ought to ask ourselves, "Why am I doing what i am doing in the Church? Why did I go to Church last Sunday? Why did I hold family home evening? Why did I do my home teaching?" If the answer was not out of love of God or to build His kingdom, then the motivation was not correct. And if the motivation is not correct, then we are not becoming what we ought to be. We are just doing things.

Remember, the final judgment is not based solely on what we have done. Remember the words of the Savior: "For the day soon cometh, that men shall come before me to judgment, to be judged according to their works. And many will say unto me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name; and in thy name cast out devils; and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I say, Ye never knew me; depart from me ye that work iniquity" (JST Matt. 7:31-33). We can only come to know the Lord when we do the things He does with the same motivation that governs His actions.
 

The Savior Turns Questioner

The Savior's answer left no room for debate and the Pharisees were utterly silenced. Taking advantage of the quiet of the moment, the Savior posed a very important question. "What think ye of Christ? whose son is he?" They gave the response perhaps most any would have given at that time. "They say unto him, The Son of David."

It was well known among the Jews at the time of Christ that the Messiah was to come through the lineage of David. They pictured him in the role of David, as a king and conqueror of their enemies. Few, if any, associated the Messiah as divine. This was painfully obvious through the various confrontations with the Savior had with the Jews. But Jesus came into the world not to destroy men but to save them. It required Him to be divine to carry out his role as redeemer of the world.

In response to the Pharisees answer, the Savior quoted a Psalm written by David with this question: "How then doth David in spirit call him Lord, saying, The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, till I make thine enemies thy footstool? If David then call him Lord, how is he his son?" (Matt. 22:41-45). Through the use of this Psalm, the Savior made it clear that David did not consider the Messiah as a mere descendant but as his superior. "By drawing attention to a defect in the way the Pharisees understood the relationship of David to David's Son, Jesus was encouraging his hearers to think again about what Messiah meant." (25)

Matthew records the conclusion to this scene in these words: "And no man was able to answer him a word, neither durst any man from that day forth ask him any more questions" (22:46).
 

"Wo unto you . . . Hypocrites"

As has been shown, this last day of the Savior's ministry had been filled with confrontation with the religious leaders of the Jews-the very people who should have been preparing the people for the Savior's visit. How different they were from Nephi, son of Nephi, who labored diligently to prepare his people for the visit of the God of this world (see 3 Nephi). Seeing the hypocrisy of the Jewish leaders, the Savior ended his mortal public ministry by castigating their wicked behavior. This is recorded in Matthew 23.

In no uncertain terms, the Savior warned the multitude of the abhorrent behavior of their so-called religious leaders. "Whatsoever they bid you observe," the Savior declared, "that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not" (23:3). In other words, follow the teachings of the law they expound but avoid their practice of the law, for often their practice went beyond the law. "They studied the law of Moses closely and expounded it in great detail. There was nothing wrong with this part of what they were doing, and Jesus commends it. Of course, when they went beyond the law of Moses they could and did go wrong, and Jesus criticizes them for it." (26)

The Savior cataloged eight (27) grievances He had with the results of their interpretation and practice of the law. Each began with "woe."

(1) "Ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in." (23:13) Through their interpretation of the law, they misleading people and thus leading them from the true Kingdom of God.

(2) "Ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation" (23:14). Perhaps the widow's houses were being devoured by the Pharisees insistence upon a second tithe which already taxed and overtaxed people.

(3) "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves" (23:15).

(4) "Woe unto you, ye blind guides, which say, Whosoever shall swear by the temple, it is nothing; but whosoever shall swear by the gold of the temple, he is a debtor!" (23:16). The Pharisees were so concerned about nit-picky details that it caused them not to see the whole. In this case, they were concerned about the exact and proper way of making an oath. They believed if it was said wrong it was not binding. It was the wording of the oath, not what was in the heart of oath-maker that was important.

(5) "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone. Ye blind guides, which strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel" (23:23-24). It was not the paying of tithing that concerned the Savior but placing details and policies above the purposes and motives of the law. In the gospel all things are important but "lesser things, however useful or needful, must never eclipse the greater." (28) When the gospel is reduced to the minutia of "do's" and "don'ts" then the purpose and intent of the law is missed. For example, in the Church today, to often our young people are deluged with the do's and don'ts of chastity but are seldom taught the doctrine of the law of procreation and parenthood!!

(6) "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye make clean the outside of the cup and of the platter, but within they are full of extortion and excess. Thou blind Pharisee, cleanse first that which is within the cup and platter, that the outside of them may be clean also" (23:25-26). What robbery the Pharisees were guilty of is not stated but it may be that they supported the Temple hierarchy and their priestcraft or at the least saw nothing wrong in what they did. Indeed, many of the Pharisees may have been involved in the priestcraft itself! "Cups and platters though cleansed to perfection were filthy before the Lord if their contents had been bought by the gold of extortion, or were to be used in pandering to gluttony, drunkenness or other excess." (29)

(7) "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness. Even so ye also outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within ye are full of hypocrisy and iniquity" (23:27-28). The meaning here is obvious. Though sometimes their actions were correct, their motives were not. Elder Dallin H. Oaks, taught, "Jesus looked beyond the actions of the scribes and Pharisees and condemned them because of their motives. He likened them to 'whited sepulchres,' which appear beautiful outside but are unclean inside. Although their actions he referred to were appropriate, they were acting for the wrong reasons." (30)

(8) "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! because ye build the tombs of the prophets, and garnish the sepulchres of the righteous, And say, If we had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets. Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets. Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers. Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?" (23:29-33). The Pharisees had built and decorated tombs for the prophets who had been denounced by their fathers in order to bring honor to give them the honor they deserved. Their hypocrisy was shown that they were not honoring the present prophets, including the Son of God. But because they were rejecting the present prophets, their fate would be no different than their fathers.
 

The Final Prophecy

The Savior ended his denunciation of the Pharisees with this warning and promise: "O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not! Behold, your house is left unto you desolate" (23:37-38). The Savior was so moved by the horrors that would come upon the Jews because of their rejection of him, that the Joseph Smith translation adds that the Savior wept while giving this prophecy (JST Matt. 23:36).

The Savior then turned from the crowds and left the Temple. As he was leaving, " his disciples came to him, for to hear him, saying: Master, show us concerning the buildings of the temple, as thou hast said--They shall be thrown down, and left unto you desolate. And Jesus said unto them: See ye not all these things, and do ye not understand them? Verily I say unto you, there shall not be left here, upon this temple, one stone upon another that shall not be thrown down." (JS Matt. 1:2-3).

The Savior's public ministry had come to an end. No longer would he teach the people. It was left to them to either accept or reject the Man and His message. As we know, for the most part, they rejected His message. As a result, they felt the full brunt of the last prophecy the Savior gave to the people.
 
 
 
 Notes
 

1. S. Safrai, "The Temple," in The Jewish People in the First Century (2 Vols., Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1987), 2:877; Safrai gleans this information from the Mishna and Talmud which may suggest that this was the ideal but may not have always been practiced.

2. Safrai, "The Temple," pp. 865-866.

3. K. C. Hanson & Douglas E. Oakman, Palestinge in the Time of Jesus (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1998), p. 119.

4. Hanson & Oakman, Palestine in the Time of Jesus, p. 120.

5. Richard A. Horsely, Bandits, Prophets, and Messiahs (Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press International, 1999), pp. 58-59.

6. Hanson & Oakman, Palestine in the Time of Jesus, p. 153.

7. Hanson & Oakman, Palestine in the Time of Jesus, p. 152.

8. Hanson & Oakman, Palestine in the Time of Jesus, p. 155.

9. Mishnah Kerithoth 1:7.

10. I am in Israel often in spring time. Many times I have come across fig trees just putting forth leaves. Already, the fruit of the fig tree is coming out and in many cases is larger than the budding leaves. Fig trees produce several crops every year. The first crop is generally harvested in June and is especially sweet. The second crop is harvested in August. The final crop is harvested towards the end of November. Figs can be eaten fresh, dried, or made into cakes.

Often the question is raised as to why the Savior would attempt to eat figs before they were ripe (the cursing of the fig tree was a week before Passover which is in March or April). So I decided to find out what a fig tastes like at that time of year. So in 2001, while assigned at BYU's Jerusalem Center, I found a few different fig trees and ate the fruit. The taste was rather blah-not bitter or sweet. But it was eatable! So it would be possible for someone who was hungry to eat the unripe fruit of a fig tree.

11. Spencer W. Kimball, The Miracle of Forgiveness (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1969), p.92.

12. Francis W. Beare, The Gospel According to Matthew (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1981), p. 422.

13. W. D. Davies & Dale C. Allison, Jr., The Gospel According to Saint Matthew (Edinburgh, Scottland: T&T Clark, 1997), p. 159.

14. Leon Morris, The Gospel According to Matthew (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1992), p. 535

15. See Richard K. Hart, "The Marriage Metaphor," Ensign, Jan. 1995, pp. 22-25.

16. Joseph Smith, Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith (Compiled by Joseph Fielding Smith, Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1976), p.47.

17. Bruce R. McConkie, The Mortal Messiah, (The Messiah Series, vols. 2-5. Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1979-1982), 3:367-368.

18. Morris, The Gospel According to Matthew, p. 556.

19. N. Eldon Tanner, "The Laws of God," Ensign, Nov. 1975, p. 83.

20. "Levirate Marriage," in LDS Bible Dictionary, p. 724.

21. James E. Talmage, Jesus the Christ, Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1982, p. 509.

22. Morris, The Gospel According to Matthew, p. 563.

23. Morris, The Gospel According to Matthew, p. 556.

24. Dallin H. Oaks, "The Challenge to Become," Ensign, Nov. 2000, p. 32.

25. Morris, The Gospel According to Matthew, p. 567.

26. Morris, The Gospel According to Matthew, p. 573.

27. Most Greek manuscripts of Matthew only record seven woes whereas the King James Version records eight.

28. Davies & Allison, The Gospel According to Saint Matthew, p. 293.

29. Talmage, Jesus the Christ, p. 558.

30. Dallin H. Oaks, Pure in Heart. Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1988, p. 4.

 

 

Developing and Maintaining Spirituality

 

Know Your Religion

 

November 22, 2002

 

Bruce told a story of a trip he took with Jerusalem Center students to the traditional spot of Christ’s baptism.  There is a 1st century church on the site.  It is by the Dead Sea on the Jordan River, the lowest spot on the face of the earth.  Christ descended below all things.  Afterwards the group sang “Come Follow Me”.

 

 

Christ Descended Below All Things



D&C 88:6-7

He that ascended up on high, as also he descended below all things, in that he comprehended all things, that he might be in all and through all things, the light of truth; which truth shineth.

 

D&C 122

1 The ends of the earth shall inquire after thy name, and fools shall have thee in derision, and hell shall rage against thee;

2 While the pure in heart, and the wise, and the noble, and the virtuous, shall seek counsel, and authority, and blessings constantly from under thy hand.

3 And thy people shall never be turned against thee by the testimony of traitors.

4 And although their influence shall cast thee into trouble, and into bars and walls, thou shalt be had in honor; and but for a small moment and thy voice shall be more terrible in the midst of thine enemies than the fierce lion, because of thy righteousness; and thy God shall stand by thee forever and ever.

5 If thou art called to pass through tribulation; if thou art in perils among false brethren; if thou art in perils among robbers; if thou art in perils by land or by sea;

6 If thou art accused with all manner of false accusations; if thine enemies fall upon thee; if they tear thee from the society of thy father and mother and brethren and sisters; and if with a drawn sword thine enemies tear thee from the bosom of thy wife, and of thine offspring, and thine elder son, although but six years of age, shall cling to thy garments, and shall say, My father, my father, why can't you stay with us? O, my father, what are the men going to do with you? and if then he shall be thrust from thee by the sword, and thou be dragged to prison, and thine enemies prowl around thee like wolves for the blood of the lamb;

7 And if thou shouldst be cast into the pit, or into the hands of murderers, and the sentence of death passed upon thee; if thou be cast into the deep; if the billowing surge conspire against thee; if fierce winds become thine enemy; if the heavens gather blackness, and all the elements combine to hedge up the way; and above all, if the very jaws of hell shall gape open the mouth wide after thee, know thou, my son, that all these things shall give thee experience, and shall be for thy good.

8 The Son of Man hath descended below them all. Art thou greater than he?

 

Brigham Young,

It is written of the Saviour that he descended below all things. If he did he descended in capacity. I will merely tell you what I believe on this point. I believe that there never was a child born on this earth with any less capacity than dwelt in the child that was born in a manger of his mother Mary. I believe, according to the natural ability which he received from his mother and from his supposed father Joseph, that there never was a child that descended lower in capacity, or that knew less. Yet, according to the history given of him, his power of mind developed with such wonderful rapidity that when he was but a few years old he propounded questions to the learned doctors of his day which they could not answer, and answered questions propounded to him which the querists could not answer. He increased in wisdom and knowledge, and came into communication with his Father. The Being whom we call Father was the Father of the spirit of the Lord Jesus Christ, and he was also his Father pertaining to the flesh. Infidels and Christians, make all you can of this statement. The Bible, which all Christians profess to believe, reveals that fact, and it reveals the truth upon that point, and I am a witness of its truth. The Apostles who were personally acquainted with Jesus Christ did know and understand what they wrote, and they wrote the truth. (Journal of Discourses, 7:286)

 

John Taylor

The object of man's taking a body is, that through the redemption of Jesus Christ, both soul and body may be exalted in the eternal world, when the earth shall be celestial, and to obtain a higher exaltation than he would be capable of doing without a body. For when man was first made, he was made "a little lower than the angels," Heb. 2:7; but through the atonement and resurrection of Jesus Christ, he is placed in a position to obtain an exaltation higher than that of angels. Says the Apostle, "Know ye not that we shall judge angels?" 1 Cor. 6:3. "Jesus descended below all things, that he might be raised above all things." He took upon him a body, that he might die as a man, and "that through death, he might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the Devil." Heb. 2:14. Having conquered Death, then, in his own dominions, burst the barriers of the tomb, and ascended with his body triumphant to the right hand of God, he has accomplished a purpose which God had decreed from before the foundation of the world, "and opened the kingdom of heaven to all believers." Hence man, through obedience to the Gospel, is placed in a position to be an adopted son of God, and have a legitimate right to his Father's blessings, and to possess the gift of the Holy Ghost. And the Apostle says, that "If the spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead, dwell in you, he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortal bodies by his Spirit that dwelleth in you." Rom. 8:11. Thus, as Jesus vanquished death, so may we; as he overcame, so may we; and, if faithful, sit with him upon his throne, as he has overcome, and sat down upon his Father's throne. Rev. 3:21. Thus, an will not only be raised from degradation, but will also be exalted to a seat among the intelligence which surround the throne of God. This is one great object of our coming here and taking bodies. (The Government of God, Ch.5)


Groaning beneath this concentrated load, this intense, incomprehensible pressure, this terrible exaction of Divine justice, from which feeble humanity shrank, and through the agony thus experienced sweating great drops of blood, He was led to exclaim, "Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me." He had wrestled with the superincumbent load in the wilderness, He had struggled against the powers of darkness that had been let loose upon him there; placed below all things, His mind surcharged with agony and pain, lonely and apparently helpless and forsaken, in his agony and the blood oozed from His pores. Thus rejected by His own, attacked by the powers of darkness, and seemingly forsaken by His God, on the cross He bowed beneath the accumulated load, and cried out in anguish, "My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me!" When death approached to relieve Him from His horrible position, a ray of hope appeared through the abyss of darkness with which He had been surrounded, and in a spasm of relief, seeing the bright future beyond, He said, "It is finished! Father, into thy hands I commend my spirit." As a God, He descended below all things, and made Himself subject to man in man's fallen condition; as a man, He grappled with all the circumstances incident to His sufferings in the world. Anointed, indeed, with the oil of gladness above His fellows, He struggled with and overcame the powers of men and devils, of earth and hell combined; and aided by this superior power of the Godhead, He vanquished death, hell and the grave, and arose triumphant as the Son of God, the very eternal Father, the Messiah, the Prince of peace, the Redeemer, the Savior of the world; having finished and completed the work pertaining to the atonement, which His Father had given Him to do as the Son of God and the Son of man. As the Son of Man, He endured all that it was possible for flesh and blood to endure, as the Son of God He triumphed over all, and forever ascended to the right hand of God, to further carry out the designs of Jehovah pertaining to the world and to the human family. ( Mediation and Atonement, Ch.21)

 

Wilford Woodruff

The Lord has said concerning Jesus, that he descended below all things that he might rise above all things, and comprehend all things. No man descended lower than the Savior of the world. Born in a stable, cradled in a manger, he traveled from there to the cross through suffering, mingled with blood, to a throne of grace; and in all his life there was nothing of an earthly nature that seemed to be worth possessing. His whole life was passed in poverty, suffering, pain, affliction, labor, prayer, mourning and sorrow, until he gave up the ghost on the cross. Still he was God's firstborn son and the Redeemer of the world. The question might be asked why the Lord suffered his Son to come here and to live and die as he did. When we get into the spirit world, and the vail is withdrawn, we shall then perhaps understand the whys and wherefore of all these things. In the dispensations and providences of God to man it seems that we are born to suffer pain, affliction, sorrows and trials; this is what God has decreed that the human family shall pass through; and if we make a right use of this probation, the experience it brings will eventually prove a great blessing to us, and when we receive immortality and eternal life, exaltation, kingdoms, thrones, principalities and powers with all the blessings of the fulness of the Gospel of Christ, we shall understand and comprehend why we are called to pass through a continual warfare during the few years we spent in the flesh. (Journal of Discourses, Vol.18, p.33)

 

Then let us be careful. Let us realize our condition. Let us realize we are here upon a mission. Let us realize that we will be held responsible for the manner in which we will it. We should be willing to sacrifice everything for the upbuilding of the Kingdom of God. Any man who will seek to save his life and desert the principles of the Gospel, is not worthy of eternal life. How many have laid down their lives since the creation of the world for the sake of the truth? Jesus Himself descended below all things. He descended, I believe, lower than any other man will be called to descend. Are we greater than Jesus? If we are called upon to-day to lay down our lives, what of it? Is it not as well to die for the Gospel's sake as to die for anything else? A million of men, a few years ago, sacrificed their lives for the honor of this nation. No matter what we may be called to pass through, let us maintain our integrity to God. Where is the man whose mind has been lit up by the inspiration of God to comprehend the celestial kingdom, or the celestial law, or the Gospel of Jesus Christ, who can bear the idea of pursuing a course whereby he will be cut off from inheriting the blessings for which he has hoped in the future? No, I would rather die a thousand deaths than be deprived of these blessings. We have a long time to live when we get through here. There is all eternity before us. It will pay you, it will pay me--no matter what comes, no matter what this nation may do to oppress us--to be true and faithful to our covenants, to our wives and children, to our God and to our country; it will pay us to be faithful to the end. (Journal of Discourses, Vol.25, p.12)

 

Joseph F. Smith (First Presidency Statement - Dec. 1904)

We celebrate an anniversary of the birth of the world's Redeemer and Who, we believe, will be its Lord and King. His entrance into the world was the signal for the songs of angels and the rejoicings of the heavenly host. He descended below all things that He might rise above all things, and in that experience comprehend and obtain power over all things. (Messages of the First Presidency, Vol.4, pp.92-93)

 

Ezra Taft Benson

It was in Gethsemane that Jesus took on Himself the sins of the world, in Gethsemane that His pain was equivalent to the cumulative burden of all men, in Gethsemane that He descended below all things so that all could repent and come to Him. The mortal mind fails to fathom, the tongue cannot express, the pen of man cannot describe the breadth, the depth, the height of the suffering of our Lord - nor His infinite love for us. (Teachings of Ezra Taft Benson, p.14)

 

Now let me describe to you what faith in Jesus Christ means. Faith in Him is more than mere acknowledgment that He lives. It is more than professing belief. Faith in Jesus Christ consists of complete reliance on Him. As God, He has infinite power, intelligence, and love. There is no human problem beyond His capacity to solve. Because He descended below all things, He knows how to help us rise above our daily difficulties. (Teachings of Ezra Taft Benson, p.66)



Bruce R. McConkie

Crucifixion was the form of death chosen from the beginning for Christ, that in his death, having descended below all things, he might in his resurrection ascend above all things. (Mormon Doctrine, p.174)

 

Neal A. Maxwell

President Brigham Young spoke of what evoked the "why" from Jesus, saying that during the axis of agony which was Gethsemane and Calvary, the Father at some point withdrew both His presence and His Spirit from Jesus (see Journal of Discourses 3:205-6). Thereby Jesus' personal triumph was complete and His empathy perfected. Having "descended below all things," He comprehends, perfectly and personally, the full range of human suffering! (D&C 88:6; see D&C 122:8). A spiritual sung in yesteryear has an especially moving and insightful line: "Nobody knows the troubles I've seen, nobody knows but Jesus" (see also Alma 7:11-12). Truly, Jesus was exquisitely "acquainted with grief," as no one else (Isa. 53:3). ["Apply the Atoning Blood of Christ," Ensign, Nov. 1997, p. 23]

 

Elder Wirthlin gave a talk in October 1992 on Spiritual Bonfires of a Testimony, get a copy and read it. 

 

Spiritual Bonfires of Testimony

Elder Joseph B. Wirthlin
Of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles
Ensign, Nov. 1992, 34-36

Many years ago, large packs of wolves roamed the countryside in Ukraine, making travel in that part of the world very dangerous. These wolf packs were fearless. They were not intimidated by people nor by any of the weapons available at that time. The only thing that seemed to frighten them was fire. Consequently, travelers who found themselves away from cities developed the common practice of building a large bonfire and keeping it burning through the night. As long as the fire burned brightly, the wolves stayed away. But if it were allowed to burn out and die, the wolves would move in for an attack. Travelers understood that building and maintaining a roaring bonfire was not just a matter of convenience or comfort; it was a matter of survival. (See Mary Pratt Parrish, Ensign, May 1972, p. 25.)

We do not have to protect ourselves from wolf packs as we travel the road of life today, but, in a spiritual sense, we do face the devious wolves of Satan in the forms of temptation, evil, and sin. We live in dangerous times when these ravenous wolves roam the spiritual countryside in search of those who may be weak in faith or feeble in their conviction. In his first epistle, Peter described our "adversary the devil, as a roaring lion [that] walketh about, seeking whom he may devour." (1 Pet. 5:8.) The Lord told the Prophet Joseph Smith that "enemies prowl around thee like wolves for the blood of the lamb." (D&C 122:6.) We are all vulnerable to attack. However, we can fortify ourselves with the protection provided by a burning testimony that, like a bonfire, has been built adequately and maintained carefully.

Unfortunately, some in the Church may believe sincerely that their testimony is a raging bonfire when it really is little more than the faint flickering of a candle. Their faithfulness has more to do with habit than holiness, and their pursuit of personal righteousness almost always takes a back seat to their pursuit of personal interests and pleasure. With such a feeble light of testimony for protection, these travelers on life's highways are easy prey for the wolves of the adversary.

The Savior understood that many of His followers would struggle under the rigors of true discipleship; consequently, He taught them how to build burning testimonies. The night before His crucifixion, Jesus shared the feast of the Passover with His twelve beloved Apostles, most of whom had been with Him throughout His ministry. At one point during this sacred evening, the Lord looked upon Peter, His senior Apostle and loyal friend. Knowing what would be required of Peter after the Ascension, the Lord said: "Simon, Simon, behold, Satan hath desired to have you, that he may sift you as wheat:

"But I have prayed for thee, that thy faith fail not: and when thou art converted, strengthen thy brethren." (Luke 22:31-32; emphasis added.)

Imagine for a moment that you are Peter. Three years ago a holy stranger invited you to set aside your fishing boat and nets, your means of support for yourself and your family, and then asked you to follow Him. You did so without hesitation, and for three years you have continued to follow and to love and support and sustain Him. You have seen Him confound the wise, comfort the weary and the afflicted, heal the sick, and raise the dead to life. You have seen Him conquer evil spirits, calm the troubled seas, and for a few minutes, at least, you even walked on the water toward Him. You were at His side when Moses and Elias appeared to Him; you saw Him transfigured before your very eyes. You have committed your entire life to Him. And now He questions you by instructing you to strengthen your brethren "when thou art converted."

Peter was surprised. He assured the Lord, "I am ready to go with thee, both into prison, and to death." (Luke 22:33.) But Jesus knew and understood. He was not condemning Peter for a lack of conviction; Peter demonstrated his conviction during the Lord's arrest. Rather, the Savior was telling Peter what he needed to do when his testimony became more secure.

As He knew Peter, the Lord understands you and me when our testimonies may not be the brightly burning bonfire you may think they are or want them to be. Perhaps in some cases, that testimony is constructed unwisely, built on a social [page 35] foundation of programs and personalities instead of the sure rock of personal revelation. Or perhaps you have allowed your testimony to flicker gradually through the years of disuse and spiritual complacency.

Regardless of the reason your testimony may be growing dim, the Savior lovingly urges you to come unto Him and become strengthened in Him. Said He to Moroni: "If men come unto me I will show unto them their weakness. I give unto men weakness that they may be humble; … for if they humble themselves before me, and have faith in me, then will I make weak things become strong unto them." (Ether 12:27.)

Some people are weak in their faith and testimonies but are not even aware of how precarious their situation is. Many of them likely would be offended at the suggestion. They raise their right hand to sustain Church leaders and then murmur and complain when a decision does not square with their way of thinking. They claim to be obedient to God's commandments but do not feel at all uncomfortable about purchasing food at the store on Sunday and then asking the Lord to bless it. Some say they would give their lives for the Lord, yet they refuse to serve in the nursery.

The Savior spoke very explicitly about people who "draw near me with their mouth, and with their lips do honour me, but have removed their heart far from me." (Isa. 29:13.) His words were: "Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.

"Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?

"And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity." (Matt. 7:21-23.)

None would want to hear the Lord speak such disappointing words of you. That is why you need to do everything in your power to be absolutely certain that your spiritual bonfire of testimony is burning brightly enough to keep the wolves of darkness away. You can always use more dry kindling. As the Apostle Paul taught, each of us has "come short of the glory of God." (Rom. 3:23.) None of us has progressed so far in this life that we do not need to continually fortify our testimonies.

I offer three suggestions that will fan the flame of personal testimony as a protection against the wolves of evil that are prowling all around us to threaten our spiritual security.

First, make sure your testimony is built upon a solid foundation of faith in the Lord, Jesus Christ. Even though we enjoy the fellowship of the Saints and have strong feelings about the inspired programs of the Church, we must remember that we have only one sure anchor for our souls. It is stated in the words of the prophet Helaman, when he taught his sons:

"And now, my sons, remember, remember that it is upon the rock of our Redeemer, who is Christ, the Son of God, that ye must build your foundation; that when the devil shall send forth his mighty winds, yea, his shafts in the whirlwind, yea, when all his hail and his mighty storm shall beat upon you, it shall have no power over you to drag you down to the gulf of misery and endless wo, because of the rock upon which ye are built, which is a sure foundation, a foundation whereon if men build they cannot fall." (Hel. 5:12.)

Perhaps you are one of the members of the Church whose first contact with the gospel came through the [page 36] beautiful music of the Tabernacle Choir. Maybe your life was blessed by the Church welfare program when you followed prophetic counsel to store food and other necessities. These are marvelous, inspired aspects of the Church that God has provided to help bring his children to Christ. However, they are implements and not ends in themselves. The ultimate focus of our devotion must properly be our Heavenly Father and His Beloved Son, Jesus Christ.

We often hear of members who have separated themselves from the Church because some leader, teacher, or member has said or done something to offend them. Others have had their faith shaken when the Brethren have taken a stand with which they disagree. In such cases, I wonder about the faith of those people and whether it was grounded securely in a testimony of the Lord, Jesus Christ, or merely based on their own ideas and social perceptions of what the Church and its members should be.

Scripture teaches us: "Trust in the Lord with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding." (Prov. 3:5.) In His moving prayer recorded in the seventeenth chapter of John, the Savior taught this profound truth: "And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent." (John 17:3.) Building a testimony on the foundation of a sincere, personal relationship with our Heavenly Father and His Beloved Son, Jesus Christ, and on our faith in them, should be our highest priority.

Anchored with that faith, we are ready for my second suggestion -- another layer of kindling on the bonfire of testimony - it is humble, sincere repentance. Few things extinguish the fervor of the Holy Spirit in the heart of any individual more quickly than does sin. It dulls the spiritual senses, diminishes confidence and personal security, and separates the sinner from the Savior. One who carries the burden of unrepented sin is more likely to rationalize additional disobedience. The more sin is rationalized, the greater the possibility of destruction by Satan's wolves.

Few would argue the potential spiritual risk of major sins like murder or marital infidelity. But what about the person who uses employer's time to complete personal projects, the person who sneaks into a pornographic movie, the student who cheats at school, the person who criticizes others unfairly, or the parent who thinks family home evening is a good idea--for someone else?

The simple fact is this: anything that does not draw us closer to God takes us away from Him. We have no middle ground, no foggy gray area where we can sin a little without suffering spiritual decline. That is why we must repent and come to Christ daily on submissive knees so that we can prevent our bonfires of testimony from being snuffed out by sin.

My third suggestion is that we follow the example of the Savior. He set the pattern.

In any pursuit and under any condition, we can ask ourselves what would Jesus do and then determine our own course accordingly. For example, what sort of home teacher would the Savior be? Would He occasionally miss visiting families? Would He visit them without a message? Or would He minister to His families like the Good Shepherd that He is, with constant watch care and loving kindness? Deep in our hearts we know what kind of home teacher Jesus would be, just as we know what kind of bishop, teacher, Primary leader, clerk, or youth adviser He would be. Even though we could never in this life measure up completely to His standard of excellence, our attempt to do so will lead us to do far better than otherwise.

We can apply the same principle to other pursuits the same way. What sort of parent would Jesus be? What sort of neighbor, employer, employee, student, or friend? If we live our lives to conform as nearly as possible to the pattern the Savior has set, our testimonies will be fortified continually and our spiritual bonfires will never be reduced to embers.

We live in perilous times. The influence of Satan often appears to be unchecked and overwhelming. Remember the promise that God has given to those who build and maintain brightly burning bonfires of testimony to counter the wolves that threaten us. This is His promise: "Fear thou not; for I am with thee: be not dismayed; for I am thy God: I will strengthen thee; yea, I will … uphold thee with the right hand of my righteousness." (Isa. 41:10.)

The strength of the Church lies in the depth and vitality of the personal testimonies of its members. Firm, secure testimonies will be the difference between faithfulness and disaffection.

I bear testimony that in order for us to enjoy a happy, rewarding, and spiritual life, we must make sure that our testimonies are built upon the foundation of faith in the Lord, Jesus Christ, humble and sincere repentance, and following the example of the Savior.

I know that our Heavenly Father lives and loves each of His children. His Son, Jesus Christ, is our Savior and Redeemer. Christ's atonement provides for all of us immortality and the possibility of eternal life, the kind of life that God lives, if we will repent of our sins and will be true and faithful in keeping the commandments. Joseph Smith is a prophet of God. Through him, the Lord restored the gospel of Jesus Christ in these the latter days. President Ezra Taft Benson is our prophet today. I testify of these divine truths in the name of Jesus Christ, amen.

1 Peter 5:8 – D & C 122:6, we live in a dangerous world and are vulnerable to attack.

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 122:6.)

 

6 If thou art accused with all manner of false accusations; if thine enemies fall upon thee; if they tear thee from the society of thy father and mother and brethren and sisters; and if with a drawn sword thine enemies tear thee from the bosom of thy wife, and of thine offspring, and thine elder son, although but six years of age, shall cling to thy garments, and shall say, My father, my father, why can't you stay with us? O, my father, what are the men going to do with you? and if then he shall be thrust from thee by the sword, and thou be dragged to prison, and thine enemies prowl around thee like wolves for the blood of the lamb;

 

Alma 5:26 – Do we do things out of habit or from our testimonies?

 

(Alma 5:26.)

 

26 And now behold, I say unto you, my brethren, if ye have experienced a change of heart, and if ye have felt to sing the song of redeeming love, I would ask, can ye feel so now?

 

 

The Dangers of
Superficial Church Membership
____________________________

President Ezra Taft Benson

Heed the Lord’s counsel to the Saints of this dispensation: “Prepare yourselves for the great day of the Lord” (D&C 133:10).  This preparation must consist of more than just casual membership in the Church. You must learn to be guided by personal revelation and the counsel of the living prophet so you will not be deceived.  (“Prepare Yourself for the Great Day of the Lord,” New Era, May 1982, p. 50)

Elder Neal A. Maxwell

From Men and Women of Christ:

If we enlist and take the Savior's yoke upon us we "shall find rest unto [our] souls" (Matthew 11:29). If we are only part-time soldiers, though, partially yoked, we experience quite the opposite: frustration, irritation, and the absence of His full grace and spiritual rest. In that case weaknesses persist and satisfactions are intermittent. . . Actually the partially yoked experience little spiritual satisfaction, because they are burdened by carrying the awful weight of the natural man -- without any of the joys that come from progressing toward becoming "the man of Christ." They have scarcely "[begun] to be enlightened" (Alma 32:34). The meek and fully yoked, on the other hand, find God's reassuring grace and see their weakness yielding to strength (see Ether 12:27).

Strange as it seems, a few of the partially yoked, undeservedly wearing the colors of the kingdom, are just close enough to the prescribed path and process to be able to observe in others some of the visible costs of discipleship. Sobered by that observation, they want victory without battle and expect campaign ribbons merely for watching; but there is no witness until after the trial of their faith (see Ether 12:6).

These same Church members know just enough about the doctrines to converse superficially on them, but their scant knowledge about the deep doctrines is inadequate for deep discipleship (see 1 Corinthians 2:10). Thus uninformed about the deep doctrines, they make no deep change in their lives. They lack the faith to "give place" (Alma 32:27) consistently for real discipleship. Such members move out a few hundred yards from the entrance to the straight and narrow path and repose on the first little rise, thinking, "Well, this is all there is to it"; and they end up living far below their possibilities. While not as distant as those King Benjamin described "For how knoweth a man the master whom he has not served, and who is a stranger unto him, and is far from the thoughts and intents of his heart?" (Mosiah 5:13) -- these people are not drawing closer either. (Men and Women of Christ. Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1991, pp. 2-3)
 

From "Overcome ... Even As I Also Overcame":

Events and circumstances in the last days make it imperative for us as members of the Church to become more grounded, rooted, established, and settled (see Col. 1:23; Col. 2:7; 2 Pet. 1:12). Jesus said to His disciples, "settle this in your hearts, that ye will do the things which I shall teach, and command you" (JST Luke 14:28). If not so settled, the turbulence will be severe. If settled, we will not be "tossed to and fro," whether by rumors, false doctrines, or by the behavioral and intellectual fashions of the world. Nor will we get caught up in the "talk show" mentality, spending our time like ancient Athenians "in nothing else, but either to tell, or to hear some new thing" (Acts 17:21). Why be concerned with the passing preferences of the world anyway? "For the fashion of this world passeth away" (1 Cor. 7:31). . . .

Some Church members, alas, are neither reconciled to the will of God nor are they sufficiently settled as to their covenants. . . .

Some give of their time yet withhold themselves, being present without giving of their presence and going through the superficial motions of membership instead of the deep emotions of consecrated discipleship.

Some try to get by with knowing only the headlines of the gospel, not really talking much of Christ or rejoicing in Christ and esteeming lightly His books of scripture which contain and explain His covenants (see 2 Ne. 25:26).

Some are so proud they never learn of obedience and spiritual submissiveness. They will have very arthritic knees on the day when every knee shall bend. There will be no gallery then to play to; all will be participants!

Maintaining Church membership on our own terms, therefore, is not true discipleship.

Real disciples absorb the fiery darts of the adversary by holding aloft the quenching shield of faith with one hand, while holding to the iron rod with the other (see Eph. 6:16; 1 Ne. 15:24; D&C 27:17). There should be no mistaking; it will take both hands! ("Overcome ... Even As I Also Overcame," Ensign, May 1987, p. 70)
 

Joseph Smith

The things of God are of deep import; and time, and experience, and careful and ponderous and solemn thoughts can only find them out. Thy mind, O man! if thou wilt lead a soul unto salvation, must stretch as high as the utmost heavens, and search into and contemplate the darkest abyss, and the broad expanse of eternity--thou must commune with God. How much more dignified and noble are the thoughts of God, than the vain imaginations of the human heart! (History of the Church 3:295)
 

W. H. Auden

O God, put away justice and truth for we cannot understand them and do not want them. Eternity would bore us dreadfully. Leave Thy heavens and come down to our earth of waterclocks and hedges. Become our uncle. Look after Baby, amuse Grandfather, escort Madam to the Opera, help Willy with his home-work, introduce Muriel to a handsome naval officer. Be interesting and weak like us, and we will love you as we love ourselves. (For the Time Being )
 

Thomas Pain

What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly: Tis dearness only that gives everything its value. Heaven knows how to put a proper price upon its goods. (The American Crises, p. 1)

 

 

The key to mortality is to teach the Gift of the Holy Ghost, it is critical for spiritual rebirth.  It is also important to gain a testimony to change behavior, as President Hinckley has said: The world will get worse not better.

 

President George Q. Cannon spoke of the failure of the Latter-day Saints to seek after the fruits and the gifts of the Spirit: "We find, even among those who have embraced the Gospel, hearts of unbelief. How many of you, my brethren and sisters, are seeking for these gifts that God has promised to bestow? How many of you, when you bow before your Heavenly Father in your family circle or in your secret places, contend for these gifts to be bestowed upon you? How many of you ask the Father, in the name of Jesus, to manifest Himself to you through these powers and these gifts? Or do you go along day by day like a door turning on its hinges, without having any feeling upon the subject, without exercising any faith whatever; content to be baptized and be members of the Church, and to rest there, thinking that your salvation is secure because you have done this? I say to you, in the name of the Lord, as one of His servants, that you have need to repent of this. You have need to repent of your hardness of heart, of your indifference, and of your carelessness. There is not that diligence, there is not that faith, there is not that seeking for the power of God that there should be among a people who have received the precious promises we have. . . . I say to you that it is our duty to avail ourselves of the privileges which God has placed within our reach. . . .

 

"I feel to bear testimony to you, my brethren and sisters . . . that God is the same to-day as He was yesterday; that God is willing to bestow these gifts upon His children. . . . If any of us are imperfect, it is our duty to pray for the gift that will make us perfect. Have I imperfections? I am full of them. What is my duty? To pray to God to give me the gifts that will correct these imperfections. If I am an angry man, it is my duty to pray for charity, which suffereth long and is kind. Am I an envious man? It is my duty to seek for charity, which envieth not. So with all the gifts of the Gospel. They are intended for this purpose. No man ought to say, 'Oh, I cannot help this; it is my nature.' He is not justified in it, for the reason that God has promised to give strength to correct these things, and to give gifts that will eradicate them. If a man lack wisdom, it is his duty to ask God for wisdom. The same with everything else. That is the design of God concerning His Church. He wants His Saints to be perfected in the truth. For this purpose He gives these gifts, and bestows them upon those who seek after them, in order that they may be a perfect people upon the face of the earth, notwithstanding their many weaknesses, because God has promised to give the gifts that are necessary for their perfection." (Millennial Star, 23 Apr. 1894, pp. 259-61; italics added.)

 

The Spirit of God sanctifies—it cleanses and purges the human heart. The Spirit does far more, however, than remove uncleanness. It also fills. It fills one with a holy element, with a sacred presence that motivates to a godly walk and goodly works. Such persons filled with the Holy Ghost (and with charity) do not necessarily plan out how they will perform the works of righteousness; they do not always plot and design which deeds and what actions are to be done in every situation. Rather, they embody righteousness. They are goodness. Good works flow from a regenerate heart and evidence their commitment to their Lord and Master. Yes, these persons do have agency. Indeed, they are free, because they have given themselves up to the Lord and his purposes. They choose to do good, but their choices are motivated by the Spirit of the Lord. They live in a world of turmoil but are at peace. They may exist in a society that is steeped in anxiety and uncertainty, but they are at rest. They may live among persons on all sides who are frightened, but they are secure, for charity, or perfect love, casts out all fear. (Moroni 8:16; 1 John 4:18.)

 

 

(Robert L. Millet, Steadfast and Immovable: Striving for Spiritual Maturity [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1992], 98.)

 

We overcome spiritual death by baptism, and then we must work on maintaining spirituality, see JS verse 30.

 

Part of mortality is to be tested, we need to be tried and have our integrity challenged.

 

John 3:2-5 – Baptism by water and the Gift of the Holy Ghost, Teachings pg. 163, Pres. Romney’s talk on the Light of Christ April, 1977.

 

The Light of Christ

President Marion G. Romney
Conference Report, Apr. 1977, p. 59-63;
or Ensign, May 1977, p. 43-45

My brethren, I pray, and ask you to join in that prayer, that while I speak we will enjoy the Spirit of Christ. If we don't enjoy it, we won't enjoy these remarks, because my topic is "The Light of Christ." There are three phases of the light of Christ that I want to mention.

The first one is the light which enlighteneth every man that cometh into the world;
The second phase is the gift of the Holy Ghost;
And the third is the more sure word of prophecy.

The Light of Christ

In the eighty-eighth section of the Doctrine and Covenants, the Lord says, "The light of Christ . . . proceedeth forth from the presence of God to fill the immensity of space." (Vv. 7, 12 [D&C 88:7, 12].)

In another revelation, it is written that this light, which is "the Spirit of Jesus Christ . . . giveth light to every man that cometh into the world; and the Spirit enlighteneth every man through the world, that hearkeneth to the voice of the Spirit." (D&C 84:45­46.)

This Spirit is, no doubt, the source of one's conscience, which Webster defines as "a knowledge or feeling of right and wrong with a compulsion to do right."

Mormon was alluding to this Spirit when he wrote to his son Moroni that "every thing which inviteth and enticeth [CR, p. 60] to do good, and to love God, and to serve him, is inspired of God.

"Wherefore, take heed, my beloved brethren, that ye do not judge that which is evil to be of God, or that which is good and of God to be of the devil.

"For behold, my brethren, it is given unto you to judge, [and that gift is because the light of Christ enlighteneth every man that cometh into the world], that ye may know good from evil; and the way to judge is as plain, that ye may know with a perfect knowledge, as the daylight is from the dark night.

"For behold, the Spirit of Christ is given to every man, that he may know good from evil." ([Moroni 7:13­-16] .)

President Joseph F. Smith says that this Spirit of Christ "strives with . . . men, and will continue to strive with them [if they will resist the enticings of Satan], until it brings them to a knowledge of the truth and the possession of the greater light and testimony of the Holy Ghost." (Gospel Doctrine, Deseret Book Co., 1973, pp. 67­68.)
 

Gift of the Holy Ghost

Now, this statement of President Smith's brings us to a consideration of the second phase of our subject: the gift of the Holy Ghost.

The Holy Ghost is a person, a [Ensign, p. 44] spirit, the third member of the Godhead. He is a messenger and a witness of the Father and the Son. He brings to men testimony, witness, and knowledge of God the Father, Jesus Christ His Son, and the truths of the gospel. He vitalizes truth in the hearts and souls of men.

"There is a difference," said the Prophet Joseph Smith, "between the Holy Ghost and the gift of the Holy Ghost. Cornelius received the Holy Ghost before he was baptized, which was the convincing power of God unto him of the truth of the Gospel, but he could not receive the gift of the Holy Ghost until after he was baptized. Had he not [been baptized], the Holy Ghost which convinced him of the truth of God, would have left him." (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p. 199.) That's not my statement; that's the statement of the Prophet Joseph Smith. But I know it's true.

The gift of the Holy Ghost confers upon one, as long as he is worthy, the right to receive light and truth.

Obtaining the gift of the Holy Ghost is preceded by faith, repentance, and baptism. Retaining the spirit, power, and guidance of the Holy Ghost requires a righteous life--a dedicated effort to constantly comply with the laws and ordinances of the gospel.
 

Member of the Godhead

The Holy Ghost is, as we have said, the third member of the Godhead. Of Him the Prophet Joseph said:

"The Holy Ghost has not a body of flesh and bones [as we know that God and Jesus Christ have], but is a personage of Spirit." (D&C 130:22.)

The Holy Ghost is the great witness of, the messenger for, and testifier of the Father and the Son. The Savior, speaking of Him as the "Spirit of truth," said:

"When he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come.

"He shall glorify me: for he shall receive of mine, and shall shew it unto you." (John 16:13­14.)

By the witness and power of the Holy Ghost we receive personal testimonies of the truths of the gospel, including knowledge of God the Father and His beloved Son, Jesus Christ, our Savior and Redeemer.

Notwithstanding the availability of the gifts of the Holy Ghost, there are many people who live within reach of them who fail to see them. Concerning such tragedy, the Lord said:

"Behold, I am Jesus Christ, the Son [CR, p. 61] of God. I am the same that came unto mine own, and mine own received me not. I am the light which shineth in darkness, and the darkness comprehendeth it not." (D&C 6:21.)
 

Comprehending the light

All three of the synoptic Gospel writers record the following classic illustration of the difficulty one in darkness has in comprehending the light. Matthew's version reads:

"When Jesus came into the coasts of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, saying, Whom do men say that I the Son of man am?

"And they said, Some say that thou art John the Baptist: some, Elias; and others, Jeremias, or one of the prophets." (Matt. 16: 13­14.)

Now, the people who expressed these opinions were Christ's contemporaries. Their conclusions evidenced the fact that they knew something about His mighty works. No doubt they were aware of His claim that He was the Son of God. Their minds, however, were opaque to the light of His true identity. Although the light was shining brightly about them, they "comprehended it not."

Having heard their answer as to who men said He was, Jesus directed to His disciples the question, "But whom say ye that I am?" (Matt. 16:15 [Matthew 16:15] .)

Then Peter, speaking for himself and presumptively for the others, answered, "Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God." (Matt. 16:16 [Matthew 16:16] .) In this declaration, Peter evidenced the fact that he and his fellow disciples did comprehend the light shining in the world of spiritual darkness around them.

In His response to Peter's answer, Jesus declared a truth understood only by those who comprehend the light by and through the gift and power of the Holy Ghost, for Jesus' answer was:

"Flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee," He said, "but my Father which is in heaven, . . . and upon this rock"--meaning, upon the rock of revelation, which comes by means of the Holy Ghost--"I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it." (Matt. 16:17­18 [Matthew 16:17­18].)

How difficult it is to get one in darkness to comprehend the light or to believe that there is such light is illustrated by John's account of the interview between Jesus and Nicodemus.

"There was," says John, "a man of the Pharisees, named Nicodemus, a ruler of the Jews:

"[Who] came to Jesus by night, and said unto him, Rabbi, we know that thou art a teacher come from God: for no man can do these miracles that thou doest, except God be with him.

"Jesus answered and said . . . Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.

"Nicodemus saith unto him, How can a man be born when he is old? can he enter the second time into his mother's womb, and be born?

"Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God." (John 3:1­5; see also 3:6­10.)

One is born again by actually receiving and experiencing the light and power inherent in the gift of the Holy Ghost.
 

"More sure word of prophecy"

Now, concerning the third phase of our theme, "the more sure word of prophecy" (D&C 131:5), which is obtained by making one's "calling and election sure" (2 Pet. 1:10 [2 Peter 1:10] ), the Prophet Joseph said:

"After a person has faith in Christ, repents of his sins, and is baptized for the remission of his sins and receives the Holy Ghost, (by the laying on of hands) . . . then let him continue to humble himself before God, hungering and thirsting after righteousness, and [CR, p. 62] living by every word of God, and the Lord will soon say unto him, Son, thou shalt be exalted. When the Lord has thoroughly proved him, and finds that the man is determined to serve Him at all hazards, then the man will find his calling and his election made sure, then it will be his privilege to receive the other Comforter, which the Lord hath promised the Saints, as is recorded in the testimony of St. John." (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p. 150.)

In the eighty-eighth section of the Doctrine and Covenants is recorded a revelation in which the Lord, addressing some of the early Saints in Ohio, said:

"I now send upon you another Comforter, even upon you my friends, that it may abide in your hearts, even the Holy Spirit of promise; which other Comforter is the same that I promised unto my disciples, as is recorded in the testimony of John.

"This Comforter is the promise which I give unto you of eternal life, even the glory of the celestial kingdom." (D&C 88:3­4.)

I should think that all faithful Latter-day Saints "would want that more sure word of prophecy, that they were sealed in the heavens and had the promise of eternal life in the kingdom of God." (History of the Church of Jesus [Ensign, p. 45] Christ of Latter-day Saints, 5:388.)
 

Anchor to men's souls

As I read the sacred records, I find recorded experiences of men in all dispensations who have had this more sure anchor to their souls, this peace in their hearts.

Lehi's grandson Enos so hungered after righteousness that he cried unto the Lord until "there came a voice unto [him], saying: Enos, thy sins are forgiven thee, and thou shalt be blessed." (Enos 5 [Enos 1:5] .) Years later Enos revealed the nature of this promised blessing when he wrote:

"I soon go to the place of my rest, which is with my Redeemer; for I know that in him I shall rest. And I rejoice in the day when my mortal shall put on immortality, and shall stand before him; then shall I see his face with pleasure, and he will say unto me: Come unto me, ye blessed, there is a place prepared for you in the mansions of my Father." ([Enos 1:27].)

To Alma the Lord said, "Thou art my servant; and I covenant with thee that thou shalt have eternal life." (Mosiah 26:20.)

To His twelve Nephite disciples, the Master said:

"What is it that ye desire of me, after that I am gone to the Father?

"And they all spake, save it were three, saying: We desire that after we have lived unto the age of man, that our ministry, wherein thou hast called us, may have an end, that we may speedily come unto thee in thy kingdom.

"And he said unto them: Blessed are ye because ye desired this thing of me; therefore, after that ye are seventy and two years old ye shall come unto me in my kingdom; and with me ye shall find rest." (3 Ne. 28:1­3 [3 Nephi 28:1­3] .)

As Moroni labored in solitude abridging the Jaredite record, he received from the Lord this comforting assurance:

"Thou hast been faithful; wherefore, thy garments shall be made clean. And because thou hast seen thy weakness thou shalt be made strong, even unto the sitting down in the place which I have prepared in the mansions of my Father." (Eth. 12:37 [Ether 12:37] .)

Paul, in his second epistle to Timothy, wrote:

"I am now ready to be offered, and the time of my departure is at hand.

"I have fought a good fight, I have finished my course, I have kept the faith:

"Henceforth there is laid up for me a crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous judge, shall give me at that day." (2 Tim. 4:6­8 [2 Timothy 4:6­8].)
 

Assurances in our day

In this dispensation many have received like assurances. In the spring of 1839, while the Prophet Joseph and his associates were languishing in Liberty Jail, Heber C. Kimball, our president's grandfather, labored against great odds caring for the Saints and striving to free the brethren who were in jail. On the sixth of April he wrote:

"My family having been gone about two months, during which time I heard nothing from them; our brethren being in prison; death and destruction following us everywhere we went; I felt very sorrowful and lonely. The following words came to mind, and the Spirit said unto me, 'write,' which I did by taking a piece of paper and writing on my knee as follows: . . .

"Verily I say unto my servant Heber, thou art my son, in whom I am well pleased; for thou art careful to hearken to my words, and not transgress my law, nor rebel against my servant Joseph Smith, for thou hast a respect to the words of mine anointed, even from the least to the greatest of them; therefore"--listen to this--"thy name is written in heaven, no more to be blotted out for ever." (Orson F. Whitney, Life of Heber C. Kimball, Bookcraft, 1975, p. 241; italics added.)

To the Prophet Joseph Smith the Lord said:

"I am the Lord thy God, and will be with thee even unto the end of the world, and through all eternity; for verily I seal upon you your exaltation, and prepare a throne for you in the kingdom of my Father, with Abraham your father." (D&C 132:49; italics added.)
 

Witness of truths

Now my beloved brethren, by way of summary and conclusion, I bear witness to the verity of these great truths. I know that the Spirit of Christ enlighteneth "every man that cometh into the world; and [that] the Spirit enlighteneth every man through the world, that hearkeneth to the voice of the Spirit." (D&C 84:46.)

I know that everyone who, following the whisperings of the Spirit, develops faith, is baptized, and receives the Holy Ghost through the laying on of hands by those having authority, may, by compliance with the teachings of the gospel, receive the gifts and the power of the Holy Ghost.

And I bear further witness that every such person who, having come this far, will follow the Prophet's admonition to "continue to humble himself before God, hungering and thirsting after righteousness, and living by every word of God" (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p. 150), may obtain the more sure word of prophecy.

That the Lord will bless all of us priesthood bearers that we will so understand these great truths, that in the end we shall, by making our calling and election sure, enjoy the full light of Christ, I humbly pray, in the name of Jesus Christ, our Redeemer. Amen.

(Moses 6:58-65.) - Quickened means to be made alive, 2 types of birth, physical and spiritual, notice the similarities.  The process precedes the event.

 

58 Therefore I give unto you a commandment, to teach these things freely unto your children, saying:

 

59 That by reason of transgression cometh the fall, which fall bringeth death, and inasmuch as ye were born into the world by water, and blood, and the spirit, which I have made, and so became of dust a living soul, even so ye must be born again into the kingdom of heaven, of water, and of the Spirit, and be cleansed by blood, even the blood of mine Only Begotten; that ye might be sanctified from all sin, and enjoy the words of eternal life in this world, and eternal life in the world to come, even immortal glory;

 

60 For by the water ye keep the commandment; by the Spirit ye are justified, and by the blood ye are sanctified;

 

61 Therefore it is given to abide in you; the record of heaven; the Comforter; the peaceable things of immortal glory; the truth of all things; that which quickeneth all things, which maketh alive all things; that which knoweth all things, and hath all power according to wisdom, mercy, truth, justice, and judgment.

 

62 And now, behold, I say unto you: This is the plan of salvation unto all men, through the blood of mine Only Begotten, who shall come in the meridian of time.

 

63 And behold, all things have their likeness, and all things are created and made to bear record of me, both things which are temporal, and things which are spiritual; things which are in the heavens above, and things which are on the earth, and things which are in the earth, and things which are under the earth, both above and beneath: all things bear record of me.

 

64 And it came to pass, when the Lord had spoken with Adam, our father, that Adam cried unto the Lord, and he was caught away by the Spirit of the Lord, and was carried down into the water, and was laid under the water, and was brought forth out of the water.

 

65 And thus he was baptized, and the Spirit of God descended upon him, and thus he was born of the Spirit, and became quickened in the inner man.

 

 

 

 

Process of Spiritual Rebirth

 

 

  1. The AwakeningAlma 5:7, there are several stories in the Book of Mormon about individuals having an awakening experience.  See Teachings of Harold B. Lee, page 163.

 

 

2.  Childlike Belief – John 3:3-6, Alma 22, Mosiah 2-5, these people wanted to know the

            truth they were ready to be taught.

 

 

      3.  Taught Correct Doctrine – D & C 88:118, there is a balance between smarts and           

           revelation.  In Alma 22:5-7, Aaron teaches the king about the true nature of God.  Faith

           in the Lord Jesus Christ, helps teach and understand all other doctrine.

 

           Spiritual Rebirth brings a change of heart, it brings conversion.  Alma 22:12-14, shows us  

            how to teach and what to teach.  Testimonies are created by the manifestation of the

            Spirit.  Moroni 10:4-5, this process leads us to repentance.

 

 

  1. Develop Faith in Jesus Christ – LF 3:1-5, Faith consists of 4 parts  Elder Wirthlin Oct, 2002, CR

 

1.       Confidence and Trust in Jesus Christ    

2.       Being active – Serving others, motivated for Good

3.       Actions must be in accord with the will of God                           

4.       Timing – our faith is rewarded on His timetable not ours

 

 

These 4 points give an Individual Power to Enable Action

 

 

5.       Repentance – Ezekiel 33:11 – to turn in Hebrew means to repent, Elder T. Burton,

Notices the word turn in the scriptures (OT and Book of Mormon) how it is associated with repentance.

 

John Taylor

God is interested in the whole of the human family. He cannot take them all into the celestial kingdom, for they are not all prepared to go there, and you cannot prepare them and He cannot, because they have to be governed by certain laws and certain principles and certain feelings, and if they are not governed by these and will not be governed by a celestial law, they are not prepared for a celestial glory. There are some that may be governed by a terrestrial law, and may be prepared for a terrestrial glory, but not for a celestial glory. Still, they are God's children, and He is doing the best by them He can.   (Journal of Discourses, 24:195)

The Meaning of Metanoeo:

The Greek Word for Repentance

From: Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, 4:976-977

Noeo

  • Literally, "to direct one's mind to a subject"
  • In classical Greek it meant "to perceive" or "to notice"

Meta

  • In compounds means "after," "with," "around," etc.

Metanoeo literally means "after directing one's mind to a subject." But what did it mean to the Greeks?

Metanoeo . . .

  • can first mean "to note after, later";
  • it can then mean "to change one's mind" or "adopt another view" or "to change one's feelings"; 
  • if the change of mind derives from recognition that the earlier view was foolish, improper or evil, there arises the sense "to regret," "to feel remorse," "to rue."

From: Theological Lexicon of the New Testament, 2:472

Metanoeo is literally "know after." To repent is first of all . . .

  • a change of mind
  • a change of feelings
  • a change intentions
  • a change plans
  • to reflect (which implies a time later than the first knowledge)
  • to reconsider a first opinion
  • is a new form of thought or feeling after coming under the influence of Deception (apate), whence derive ignorance and error
     

What characterizes this evolution is that it is accompanied by regret, sorrow, or shame at the former opinion or attitude.

Adam and Eve had to turn back to the Garden to speak to God, Matthew 3:2, 4:17.

The Challenge to Become

Dallin H. Oaks
     From such teachings we conclude that the Final Judgment is not just an evaluation of a sum total of good and evil acts--what we have done. It is an acknowledgment of the final effect of our acts and thoughts--what we have become. It is not enough for anyone just to go through the motions. The commandments, ordinances, and covenants of the gospel are not a list of deposits required to be made in some heavenly account. The gospel of Jesus Christ is a plan that shows us how to become what our Heavenly Father desires us to become. . . .
      Now is the time for each of us to work toward our personal conversion, toward becoming what our Heavenly Father desires us to become. As we do so, we should remember that our family relationships--even more than our Church callings--are the setting in which the most important part of that development can occur. The conversion we must achieve requires us to be a good husband and father or a good wife and mother. Being a successful Church leader is not enough. Exaltation is an eternal family experience, and it is our mortal family experiences that are best suited to prepare us for it. (Ensign, Nov. 2000, pp. 32-34)

6. BaptismQualifies us for the gift of the Holy Ghost, now we are spiritually reborn.  We are to teach this doctrine to bring about repentance; it’s a complete change of heart.

Helaman 15:7 – the last part of verse, D of S 2:323-326.  Baptism (both) brings us back to spiritual life.

Baptism is not only a figure of the resurrection, but also is literally a transplanting or resurrection from one life to another -- from the life of sin to the life of spiritual life. For proof of that, I am going to read first something the Lord said to Joseph Smith.
    "Wherefore, I, the Lord God, caused that he [Adam] should be cast out from the Garden of Eden, from my presence, because of his transgression, wherein he became spiritually dead, which is the first death, even that same death which is the last death, which is spiritual, which shall be pronounced upon the wicked when I shall say: Depart, ye cursed."
    Here we have two conditions, spiritual life and spiritual death. The condition of Adam in the Garden of Eden was spiritual life. He was in the presence of God. Through his transgression, he was banished into spiritual death -- a new life entirely. He was no longer in the presence of God. He was shut out, separated, a veil drawn between him, and the Lord.
    Adam, after the fall, was in spiritual death, and not only Adam but every man and woman upon the face of the earth who is accountable before God, We will not consider the last death more than to say it is also banishment from the presence of God.
    "But, behold, I say unto you that I, the Lord God, gave unto Adam and unto his seed, that they should not die as to the temporal death, until I, the Lord God, should send forth angels to declare unto them repentance and redemption, through faith on the name of mine Only Begotten Son. And thus did I, the Lord God, appoint unto man the days of his probation -- that by his natural death he might be raised in immortality unto eternal life, even as many as would believe; And they that believe not unto eternal damnation; for they cannot be redeemed from their spiritual fall, because they repent not."
    We find Adam, then, in spiritual death, and all his posterity, excepting little children. All men and women need repentance. Death is banishment. They are in spiritual death. How are they going to get back? By being buried in the water. They are dead and are buried in the water and come forth in the resurrection of the Spirit back into spiritual life. That is what baptism is.  (Doctrines of Salvation, 2:323-328)

Physical growth and development will be the same as spiritual growth and development, what gives us this growth and development?  Correct nourishment!

7. Receive the Gift of the Holy Ghost – The 2nd step in baptism, without which nothing else really matters!

3 Nephi 27:19-20

    Now this is the commandment; Repent, all ye ends of the earth, and come unto me and be baptized in my name, that ye may be sanctified by the reception of the Holy Ghost, that ye may stand spotless before me at the last day.

Marion G. Romney
    One is born again by actually receiving and experiencing the light and power inherent in the gift of the Holy Ghost. (Conference Report, Apr. 1977, 61; or Ensign, May 1977, 44)

Keys to Maintain Spirituality

1.       Proper Sabbath observance

2.       The Sacrament

3.       Obedience

4.       Prayer and Revelation

5.       Feasting upon the words of Christ

6.       Fasting

7.       Meditation – Pondering

8.       Service

9.       Love your fellow man

10.    Forgive one another – without this we can kill the Spirit within with bitterness

11.    Control our environment – What are you reading and watching in your home

12.    Temple Worship

2 Nephi 1:13, 2:28-29, constant strengthening and encouragement, the spirit must overcome the natural man.  Read the Strength of Youth Pamphlet.

Spiritual Health

We know that our physical bodies require certain nutrients to sustain life and to maintain physical and mental health. If we are deprived of those nutrients, our physical and mental vitality are impaired and we have a condition called malnutrition. Malnutrition produces such symptoms as reduced mental functions, digestive disorders, loss of physical strength, and impairment of vision. Good nutrition is especially important for children, whose growing bodies are easily impaired if they lack the nutrients necessary for normal growth.

Our spirits also require nourishment. Just as there is food for the body, there is food for the spirit. The consequences of spiritual malnutrition are just as hurtful to our spiritual lives as physical malnutrition is to our physical bodies. Symptoms of spiritual malnutrition include reduced ability to digest spiritual food, reduced spiritual strength, and impairment of spiritual vision.  (Dallin H. Oaks, Spiritual Nourishment, Ensign, Dec. 1998, pp. 7-13)


How is Spirituality Obtained?

  • Spirituality comes by faith, repentance, baptism, and reception of the Holy Ghost. One who has the companionship of the Holy Ghost is in harmony with God. He is, therefore, spiritual. Spirituality is sustained by so living as to keep that companionship.  (Marion G. Romney, Ensign, Nov. 1979, pp. 15-17)

How is one spiritually reborn?

  • Being born again comes by the Spirit of God through ordinances. (Joseph Smith, Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p.162)
  • One is born again by actually receiving and experiencing the light and power inherent in the gift of the Holy Ghost. (Marion G. Romney, Conference Report, Apr. 1977, 61; or Ensign, May 1977, 44)


What is the process of spiritual rebirth?

  • The Awakening
  • Development of child like belief
  • Must be taught correct doctrine
  • Develop faith
  • Repent
  • Baptism
  • Receive the Gift of the Holy Ghost

How is spirituality maintained?

There are some important principles that we should understand to help assure that we and our children will not suffer spiritual malnutrition.
We know the principal sources of spiritual food: prayer, studying the scriptures, attending inspirational meetings, singing the hymns of Zion, serving in our callings, fasting, partaking of the sacrament, and making other covenants, such as in the temple [emphasis added]. We also know that some experiences can interfere with the assimilation of spiritual food, just as certain poisons can interfere with obtaining needed physical nourishment from physical food. For example, anything that drives away the Spirit of the Lord, such as pornography, profanity, or anger, will prevent us from obtaining the spiritual nourishment we need from experiences that would normally be effective as spiritual food. Some physical substances, like those forbidden by the Word of Wisdom, are harmful to both body and spirit. We must make sure that our children have sufficient spiritual food and that they are protected from those influences that will prevent this food from being assimilated into spiritual nourishment.  (Dallin H. Oaks, Spiritual Nourishment, Ensign, Dec. 1998, pp. 7-13)
 
 
Priesthood is the authority delegated to man to act in God’s name, relative to the salvation of man.  Covenants entered into by ordinances are the avenue back to His presence.

 

We are commanded to understand God’s will for us then act upon it for our benefit.

 

We need to access this power to:  1. Save us from spiritual death.  2.  To exalt ourselves.

 

Adam held the priesthood and its keys in the garden.

 

All of the saving ordinances of the gospel are celestial in nature.  To make them effective in our lives, in order to be saved, we need these keys and ordinances.

Alma 12:15 – the last portion of the verse points out the need to change, fruit meet for repentance.  The full effect of the Atonement is given in the temple, the power which enables us to be exalted.

 

 

THE SPIRITUAL REBIRTH PROCESS

 

 

Part One – Overcome (Spiritual Rebirth) Justification

 

There are many examples of this in the Book of Mormon, Enos, Mosiah 2-5, and Alma 22.

 

 

SPIRITUAL                     

DEATH             Out of the presence of God, how can we get back home? – D&C 29:41

                                

 

Awakening to your spiritual state – Alma 5:6-9 see verse 7

 

Childlike Belief – Mosiah 3-5, Alma 22

 

Learn Correct Doctrine – D&C 88:118

 

Faith in Jesus Christ – Lectures on Faith 3:1-5

 

Sincere Repentance – Ezekiel 18:30-32, 33:8-11

 

Baptism in water by immersion for the remission of sins, Moses 6:64-65 Justified (Not Guilty)

 

Gift of the Holy Ghost, A Baptism by Fire which cleanses the soul, Sanctified (Clean, Pure, Dedicated to Building up the Kingdom)

 

SPIRITUAL LIFE – D&C 20:31

 

 

Part Two – To process of Sanctification is reaching the highest degree in the Celestial Kingdom.

 

EXALTATION

 

 

John 3:1-5 – Nicodemus had a need to find out about Christ, he came to him by night and learned about the rebirth process.  In verse 3 we need to look at the footnote and see the Greek translation of born again, born from above.  Bruce said not to be afraid of teaching the born again concept, don’t let others steal the true meaning of scripture.  Of course we believe in being born again!  Notice in verse 5 the little “s” for our spirit and the big “S” for the Holy Ghost, it’s the same in Moses 6:58-59.   In these verses, it shows the similar manners of physical and spiritual births.   Always teach being born again at baptisms.

 

The Hebrew and Greek words for wind and spirit are the same in both languages.

 

Hebrew – Ruwach         Greek – Penauma

 

John 10:1-14 – Bruce went into detail of how Christ is both the gate and the Shepherd guarding the flock of sheep.  See the web site for pictures of a Shepherd’s enclosure

Where the sheep are protected at night, also, where the Shepherd sleeps at night, in the doorway, the only way in or out!

 

Joseph Smith
    Being born again, comes by the Spirit of God through ordinances. (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p.162)

Joseph F. Smith
    To all believers, and to the Latter-day Saints especially, there is sweet comfort in this knowledge, and in the thought that through obedience to the ordinances and principles of the gospel, which Christ, our Savior, taught and enjoined upon the people and his disciples, men shall be born again, redeemed from sin, arise from the grave, and like Jesus return into the presence of the Father. (Gospel Doctrine, p.447)

Orson Pratt
    A person cannot be born again legitimately without a legal administrator. If you are born of the Spirit, there must needs be a man authorized to administer that Spirit. Paul says, "Who hath also made us able ministers of the New Testament; not of the letter, but of the spirit, for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life." Why? Because he was authorized to lay his hands on baptized believers, and confirm upon them the gift of the Holy Ghost, that they might be born of the Spirit and become new creatures. (Journal of Discourses, 7:265)

The scriptures tell us how to live a Christlike life. What must I do to be saved? As I pondered these words, I thought of three essentials that are necessary to inspire one to live a Christlike life—or, speaking more accurately in the language of the scriptures, to live more perfectly as the Master lived. The first essential I would name in order to qualify is: There must be awakened in the individual who would be taught or who would live perfectly an awareness of his needs.

 

The rich young ruler [see Matthew 19:16-24] did not need to be taught repentance from murder nor from murderous thoughts. He did not have to be schooled in how to repent from adultery, nor from stealing, lying, defrauding, or failing to honor his mother. All these he said he had observed from his youth; but his question was, "What lack I yet?"

 

The Master, with His keen discernment and the power of a great teacher, diagnosed the young man's case perfectly: his need and his lack were to overcome his love for worldly things, his tendency to trust in riches. And then Jesus prescribed the effective remedy: "If thou wilt be perfect, go and sell that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come and follow me" (Matthew 19:21).

 

Enos, the grandson of Lehi, tells of the wrestle he had before God, before he received a remission of his sins. We are not told what his sins were, but he apparently confessed them very freely. And then he said, "And my soul hungered" (Enos 1:4). You see, that awareness and feeling of great need, and that soul-searching, brought him face to face with his lack and his need.

 

This quality of sensing one's need was expressed in the great Sermon on the Mount when the Master said, "Blessed are the poor in spirit: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven" (Matthew 5:3). The poor in spirit, of course, means those who are spiritually needy, who feel so impoverished spiritually that they reach out with great yearning for help.

 

Every one of us, if we would reach perfection, must one time ask ourselves this question, "What lack I yet?" if we would commence our climb upward on the highway to perfection. The effective leader is one who helps the learner to discover that lack, to diagnose his basic difficulties, and then to prescribe his spiritual remedies.

 

The second essential for perfection that I would name is found in the conversation the Master had with Nicodemus. He discerned as Nicodemus came to Him that he was seeking to have the answer to what many others had asked Him: "What must I do to be saved?" And the Master answered, "Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God" (John 3:3).

 

A man must be "born again" if he would reach perfection, in order to see or enter into the kingdom of God.

 

You cannot have a Christlike life without being born again. One would never be happy in the presence of the Holy One of Israel without this cleansing and purifying. Moroni said, "I say unto you that ye would be more miserable to dwell with a holy and just God, under a consciousness of your filthiness before him, than ye would to dwell with the damned souls in hell" (Mormon 9:4).

 

And then finally the third essential: to help the learner to know the gospel by living the gospel. Spiritual certainty that is necessary to salvation must be preceded by a maximum of individual effort. Grace, or the free gift of the Lord's atoning power, must be preceded by personal striving. Repeating again what Nephi said, "By grace we are saved, after all we can do" (2 Nephi 25:23).

 

The Master answered a question of the Jews as to how they could be certain as to whether His mission was of God or whether He was just another man. He said: "If any man will do his will, he shall know of the doctrine, whether it be of God, or whether I speak of myself" (John 7:17). (63-05, pp. 208, 209-10, 213, 214)

 

 

(Harold B. Lee, The Teachings of Harold B. Lee, edited by Clyde J. Williams [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1996], 163.)

 

3 Nephi 27:19-22 – In His 3rd discourse to the Nephites, the Lord explains the process of becoming clean to enter the kingdom of heaven.

 

The awakening process can leave an individual troubled, bothered and uncomfortable.  However, moving to the next step of childlike belief may not happen, the completion of all the steps may not be successful.

 

Indications of being Spiritually Reborn

 

 

  1. Change of Heart – Alma 5:12
  2. Sing the song of redeeming love, joyful and happy – Alma 5:26
  3. No more disposition to do evil – Mosiah 5:2
  4. To do good continually, looking outward instead of inward.  Focus on Building up the Kingdom of God

 

 

2 Nephi 1:13-14, 23 – Lehi is frustrated with his 2 wayward sons.  How are you going to like living in hell for eternity?

 

Alma 22 – Aaron teaches the king who has a childlike belief, who has awakened and now wants to truly learn correct doctrine, see 5-18.   Children before age 8 already have the childlike belief, temptation starts at age 8.  The Lord gives parents an 8 year head start to teach them true doctrine.

 

Many awakenings fall flat because they are not taught correct doctrine, taught at the correct time!  The Church supplements the teaching in the home, not the other way around!

 

Mosiah 4:1-3 – King Benjamin awakens the people to their plight, see 5-6.

 

Study Matthew 5 and 3 Nephi 12 to understand the Beatitudes, Bruce stressed these as a way to live our lives in mortality.  They are an overview to the whole plan.  In 3 Nephi, he is talking to the 12; see verse 1, a lesson on them is on the web site.

 

 

Helaman 15:7 – Repentance is a state of being, not an event, see the Hebrew and Greek definition of repentance.  It’s a change of view, a turning away from, Elder Burton’s talk.

 

Shube – Hebrew for turning

 

Metanoeo – Greek for adopting a different point of view

 

What characterizes this evolution is that it is accompanied by regret, sorrow, or shame at the former opinion or attitude.

 

If the view you had was carnal and the view you now have is spiritual, you have adopted a new point of view you have repented.

 

The baptism covenant is showing God you have accepted the new view, and then you receive a remission of sins, you are forgiven, justified; you can enter into the presence of Deity.

 

To be spiritually reborn is a continual process, you realize you need to learn, have faith, repent daily etc. . . .  My concern is no longer for myself, my concern is for others, and I am becoming sanctified.  The remaining Beatitudes cover sanctification, that is next week’s lesson.

 

 

Yes, eternal life. These are eschatological blessings, aren't they? "Blessed are the poor in spirit." What will the poor in spirit inherit? "Theirs is the kingdom of heaven." When will the meek inherit the earth? Only when the earth is sanctified and presented in its immortal state and becomes the celestial kingdom upon which the meek will dwell. Blessed are those who suffer persecution and ridicule for my name's sake, for great is their reward. Where? In heaven. Jesus is promising the eternal blessings, and at the outset of the ceremony tells what those things are in store for those who are worthy to obtain them. You get a foretaste of what this will be in the Beatitudes. Certainly the Beatitudes present us with a benchmark of righteousness-not just a routine, moral sense of righteousness. This list of virtues that you see presented in the Beatitudes is very similar to the list that you encounter in scriptures that talk about the process of sanctification. Look at 2 Pet. 1; look at 1 Cor. 13.  Look at the list of virtues that King Benjamin in Mosiah 3:18-19 says a person must put on in order for the atoning blood to purify that person. That's the sanctifying power. Those are the virtues that you encounter in the Beatitudes-preparing the way for holiness and sanctification

 

(Hugh Nibley, Teachings of the Book of Mormon--Semester 1: Transcripts of Lectures Presented to an Honors Book of Mormon Class at Brigham Young University, 1988--1990 [Provo: Foundation for Ancient Re, p.136)

 

 

BYUI Symposium Joseph Smith

Ether 3:15

January 29, 2005

 

(Ether 2:4.)

 

4 And it came to pass that when they had come down into the valley of Nimrod the Lord came down and talked with the brother of Jared; and he was in a cloud, and the brother of Jared saw him not.

The brother of Jared had visited the Lord before their journey.  He was told to pray and not to forget it in Ether 3:2.

He had 2 problems with the Lord’s instructions, light for the barges and air to breath.  How do you approach the Lord after he got after you? J.

He sees the finger of the Lord and is shocked He has a body.

(Ether 3:6-16.)

 

6 And it came to pass that when the brother of Jared had said these words, behold, the Lord stretched forth his hand and touched the stones one by one with his finger. And the veil was taken from off the eyes of the brother of Jared, and he saw the finger of the Lord; and it was as the finger of a man, like unto flesh and blood; and the brother of Jared fell down before the Lord, for he was struck with fear.

 

7 And the Lord saw that the brother of Jared had fallen to the earth; and the Lord said unto him: Arise, why hast thou fallen?

 

8 And he saith unto the Lord: I saw the finger of the Lord, and I feared lest he should smite me; for I knew not that the Lord had flesh and blood.

 

9 And the Lord said unto him: Because of thy faith thou hast seen that I shall take upon me flesh and blood; and never has man come before me with such exceeding faith as thou hast; for were it not so ye could not have seen my finger. Sawest thou more than this?

 

10 And he answered: Nay; Lord, show thyself unto me.

 

11 And the Lord said unto him: Believest thou the words which I shall speak?

 

12 And he answered: Yea, Lord, I know that thou speakest the truth, for thou art a God of truth, and canst not lie.

 

13 And when he had said these words, behold, the Lord showed himself unto him, and said: Because thou knowest these things ye are redeemed from the fall; therefore ye are brought back into my presence; therefore I show myself unto you.

 

14 Behold, I am he who was prepared from the foundation of the world to redeem my people. Behold, I am Jesus Christ. I am the Father and the Son. In me shall all mankind have life, and that eternally, even they who shall believe on my name; and they shall become my sons and my daughters.

 

15 And never have I showed myself unto man whom I have created, for never has man believed in me as thou hast. Seest thou that ye are created after mine own image? Yea, even all men were created in the beginning after mine own image.

 

16 Behold, this body, which ye now behold, is the body of my spirit; and man have I created after the body of my spirit; and even as I appear unto thee to be in the spirit will I appear unto my people in the flesh.

 

11 – The Lord talks to him in the present and future tense.

 

14-15 – How can that be when you think of Enoch and the events at Adam-Ondi-Ahman 3 years before Adam died?

 

Joseph Fielding Smith: "All revelation since the fall has come through Jesus Christ. . . . The Father [Elohim] has never dealt with man directly and personally since the fall, and he has never appeared except to introduce and bear record of the Son." fn Assuming that such is the case, this appearance to the brother of Jared is the first recorded manifestation of Jehovah in which he appeared and identified himself as the Son. Elsewhere the scriptures record him appearing or speaking as God the Father (for example, Moses 6:50-52, 58-59; 7:4, 32-33, 39; see also 1:1-6). But to the brother of Jared he said, "Behold, I am Jesus Christ. I am the Father and the Son. In me shall all mankind have life, and that eternally, even they who shall believe on my name; and they shall become my sons and my daughters. And never have I showed myself unto man whom I have created, for never has man believed in me as thou hast" (Ether 3:14-15).

 

The uniqueness of this situation lies in the fact that Jehovah appeared to Mahonri Moriancumer in his role as Jesus Christ--rather than as the Father. Never before, as far as we can tell from the scriptures, had Jesus Christ shown himself unto man. (And, interestingly, nowhere else in the scriptures do we have a clear example of Jehovah appearing as Jesus until his coming in the flesh.) fn As Moroni reported, "Having this perfect knowledge of God, he could not be kept from within the veil; therefore he saw Jesus" (Ether 3:20). To the brother of Jared, Christ revealed his complete nature: God who would become Man--Jehovah, the Father, who would become Jesus, the Son.

 

Perhaps the unprecedented nature of this appearance is a reason why the Lord commanded that the account not be made known in the world until after his mortal ministry (Ether 3:21).

 

Kent P. Jackson is an associate professor of ancient scripture at Brigham Young University.

 

 

 

BROTHER OF JARED SAW THE LORD IN HIS FULNESS

 

It is true that the Savior appeared to the prophets before the flood, but it is evident that he did not reveal himself in the fulness as he did to the Brother of Jared. Talking "face to face," as stated in this revelation, does not mean that the Lord did not appear in a cloud; or, that his body was partially hidden from the view of the prophet. All of this could occur and yet the Lord still be partially, if not completely, hidden from the prophet's view. The great difference rests in this, which the conversation of the Lord with the Brother of Jared clearly indicates: The Savior was conversing with the Brother of Jared in person, yes, evidently face to face, yet the Lord was hidden by a veil. The Brother of Jared knew that the Lord was there, but evidently he did not understand that the Lord had a body apparently of flesh and bones. Through his great faith he was able to see the finger of the Lord when the Lord touched the stones. So astonished did the prophet become that he fell to the earth in fright, fearing that the Lord might strike him.

 

(Joseph Fielding Smith, Answers to Gospel Questions, 5 vols. [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1957-1966], 2: 125.)

These words have disturbed many students of scripture because they know that the Lord did appear to many of his servants long before his appearance to the brother of Jared. He appeared to Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden (Moses 4:14-27; cf. Moses 5:4), to Enoch (Moses 7:4, 28-30; Genesis 5:24), to Noah (Moses 8:27; Genesis 6:9), and again to Adam and many of his righteous posterity before the great patriarch's death (D&C 107:53-54). What, therefore, did the Lord mean when he told the brother of Jared that he had never before showed himself unto man whom he had created? I now believe there is a simple explanation based on well-recognized scriptural idioms and usages. In order to present it clearly, it will be necessary to consider carefully the Lord's words to the brother of Jared just preceding those in Ether 3:15:

 

Behold, I am he who was prepared from the foundation of the world to redeem my people. Behold, I am Jesus Christ. I am the Father and the Son. In me shall all mankind have light, and that eternally, even they who shall believe on my name; and they shall become my sons and my daughters. (Ether 3:14)

 

Observe that the Lord is talking about those who believe in him. Believers shall have light, eternally, and become his spiritual sons and daughters. Believers are elsewhere called "the sons of God."

 

And Noah and his sons hearkened unto the Lord, and gave heed, and they were called the sons of God. (Moses 8:13)

 

The unbelievers are known as "the sons of men."

 

Mine anger is kindled against the sons of men, for they will not hearken to my voice. (Moses 8:15; cf. Moses 8:14)

 

Now, having explained to the brother of Jared that believers shall become sons and daughters of God (Ether 3:14), the Lord implies in 3:15 a contrast between his course of action with the brother of Jared (a believer) and that with the "sons of men" (unbelievers, carnal men). He appears in person to his servant, a believer, but never in times past has he ever done so to the unbeliever, natural man. Let me present the Lord's words with explanations in brackets to make my meaning clear.

 

And never have I showed myself unto man ["sons of men," unbelievers] whom I have created, for never has man [the unbeliever] believed in me as thou hast. (Ether 3:15)

 

This explanation is simple and fits nicely into the context.

 

The Lord proceeded to call the brother of Jared's attention to the fact that he and all men were created in his own image; that the body which he saw was his spirit body, and as he appeared in the spirit, so would he appear unto his people in the flesh (3:15-16). The explanation which the Lord gave of his own personality to the brother of Jared is one of the great contributions the Book of Mormon makes to this generation.

 

 

(Sidney B. Sperry, Book of Mormon Compendium [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1968], 467.)

 

 

Here are the thoughts from Elder Jeffrey Holland on these chapters in Ether 2-4, given at a Sperry Symposium on the Book of Mormon.

 

 

 

Rending the Veil of Unbelief

 

Jeffrey R. Holland

 

Elder Jeffrey R. Holland, formerly dean of Religious Education and president of Brigham Young University, is a member of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

 

If one were to ask a casual reader of the Book of Mormon to name the principal character in that book, the responses would undoubtedly vary. For one thing, any record covering more than a thousand years of history—with all the persons such a history would include—is unlikely to have any single, central figure emerge over such an extended period as the principal character. Nonetheless, after acknowledging that limitation, perhaps some might list any one of several favorite, or at least memorable, persons. Such names as Mormon, the abridger for whom the book is named, or Nephi, the book's early and very recognizable young prophet, or Alma, to whom so many pages are devoted, or Moroni, the fearless captain who flew the Title of Liberty, or his namesake who concluded the book and delivered it some fourteen hundred years later to the young Joseph Smith—these would undoubtedly be among some of those figures mentioned.

 

All of these responses would be provocative, but they would also be decidedly incorrect. The principal and commanding figure in the Book of Mormon, from first chapter to last, is the Lord Jesus Christ, of whom the book is truly "another testament." From the first page—indeed, from the book's title page—to the last declaration in the text, this testament reveals, demonstrates, examines, and underscores the divine mission of Jesus Christ as recorded in the sacred accounts of two New World dispensations, accounts written for the benefit of a third dispensation, the last and greatest of all dispensations, the dispensation of the fulness of times. This sacred record, written by prophets and preserved by angels, was written for one crucial, fundamental, eternally essential reason: "to the convincing of the Jew and Gentile that Jesus is the Christ, the Eternal God, manifesting himself unto all nations" (Book of Mormon, title page).

 

In a remarkable vision recorded early in the Book of Mormon, the young prophet Nephi sees the eventual preparation and circulation of the Holy Bible, "a record of the Jews, which contains the covenants of the Lord, which he hath made unto the house of Israel" (1 Nephi 13:23). But, alarmingly, he also sees the abuse and doctrinal decimation of that book as it moves down through the ages and passes through many hands.

 

It was foretold in this vision that the Bible record would be clear and untarnished in the meridian of time, that in its beginning "it contained the fulness of the gospel of the Lord," with both Old and New Testaments going "from the Jews in purity unto the Gentiles" (1 Nephi 13:24-25). But over time, both through innocent error and malicious design, many doctrines and principles, especially those emphasizing covenantal elements of "the gospel of the Lamb" were lost—and sometimes were simply willfully expunged—from "the book of the Lamb of God" (1 Nephi 13:26, 28). Unfortunately, these missing elements were both "plain and precious"—plain, we presume, in their clarity and power and ability to be understood; precious surely in their profound worth, gospel significance, and eternal importance (1 Nephi 13:28). Whatever the reason for or source of the loss of these truths from the biblical record, that loss has resulted in "pervert[ing] the right ways of the Lord, . . . blind[ing] the eyes and harden[ing] the hearts of the children of men" (1 Nephi 13:27). In painful understatement, "an exceedingly great many do stumble" (1 Nephi 13:29). Honest women and men are less informed of gospel truths and less secure in the salvation of Christ than they deserve to be because of the loss of vital truths from the biblical canon as we have it in modernity (see 1 Nephi 13:21-29).

 

But in his love and foreknowledge, the great Jehovah, the premortal Christ, promised Nephi, and all who have received Nephi's record, that "after the Gentiles do stumble exceedingly, because of the most plain and precious parts of the gospel of the Lamb which have been kept back . . . I will be merciful unto the Gentiles in that day, insomuch that I will bring forth unto them, in mine own power, much of my gospel, which shall be plain and precious, saith the Lamb.

 

"For, behold, saith the Lamb: I will manifest myself unto thy seed, that they shall write many things which I shall minister unto them, which shall be plain and precious. . . .

 

"And in them shall be written my gospel, saith the Lamb, and my rock and my salvation" (1 Nephi 13:34-36).

 

This promised record, now known to the world as the Book of Mormon, along with "other books" that have now come forth by the revelatory power of the Lamb "shall make known the plain and precious things which have been taken away from [the Bible]; and shall make known to all kindreds, tongues, and people, that the Lamb of God is the Son of the Eternal Father, and the Savior of the world; and that all men must come unto him, or they cannot be saved. And they must come according to the words which shall be established by the mouth of the Lamb; and the words of the Lamb shall be made known in the records of thy seed, as well as in [the Bible]; wherefore they both shall be established in one; for there is one God and one Shepherd over all the earth" (1 Nephi 13:39-41; emphasis added).

 

Surely the most plain and precious of all truths lost from the Bible, particularly the Old Testament, are the clear, unequivocal, and extensive declarations regarding the coming of Christ and the eternal, essential covenantal elements of his gospel which have been taught beginning with Adam and continuing on down in each dispensation of time. Thus the highest and most revered purpose of the Book of Mormon is to restore to Abraham's seed that crucial message declaring Christ's divinity, convincing all who read its pages with "a sincere heart and real intent" that Jesus is the Christ (see Moroni 10:4).

 

The fact that four-fifths of this record comes out of a period before Christ's birth, the fact that it is a record of an otherwise unknown people, the fact that inspiring insights and deep doctrines regarding Jesus are revealed here and found nowhere else in the biblical canon—or all of Christendom, for that matter—and the fact that the Book of Mormon reaffirms the truthfulness and divinity of that Bible insofar as the latter has been translated correctly are just a few of the reasons that the book should rightly be considered the most remarkable and important religious text produced since the New Testament gospels were compiled nearly two millennia ago. Indeed, in light of the plain and precious portions which have been lost from the New Testament as well as the Old Testament, it could be said that in restoring ancient biblical truths and adding scores of new ones about the Only Begotten Son of the Living God of us all, the Book of Mormon links with the Holy Bible to form in that union the most remarkable and important religious texts ever given to the world in any age of time.

 

The Book of Mormon has many purposes and it contains many true and stimulating principles, but one purpose transcends all others in both kind and degree. That purpose is "the convincing of the Jew and Gentile that Jesus is the Christ" (Book of Mormon, title page).

 

A very special contribution the Book of Mormon makes in this matter is to our knowledge of the premortal Christ. Christ as Jehovah, Christ as the God of Lehi and Nephi and the brother of Jared before His birth as well as the Redeemer of Mormon and Moroni after it, is one of the prominent messages of this record.

 

In modern times many students of religion have great difficulty in linking Old Testament theology and divinity with that which is presented in the New Testament. The Book of Mormon does so very much to bridge that gap, not only in terms of actual history, beginning six hundred years before Christ and ending four hundred years afterward, but also in the continuity of doctrine and consistent image of divinity that is taught through that period. We talk about the two sticks of Judah and Joseph coming together, as prophesied by Ezekiel, as one of the great latter-day contributions of the Book of Mormon (see Ezekiel 37:15-28); however, I think it is nearly as important to note, in bringing "sticks" together, what the Book of Mormon does to unite the Old Testament with the New Testament in a way that is not recognized or sometimes even seen as a possibility in other religious traditions.

 

Nephi, Jacob, and Isaiah—all living and prophesying before Christ—are positioned where they are at the beginning of the book to serve as the three ancient witnesses of the Book of Mormon or, more specifically, three special Book of Mormon witnesses of Christ, which surely they are. But that role of witness is shared by many, many others in the Book of Mormon, most of them prior to Christ's birth and ministry in mortality.

 

Amulek says to his fellow citizens of Ammonihah (about 74 B.C.): "My brethren, I think that it is impossible that ye should be ignorant of the things which have been spoken concerning the coming of Christ, who is taught by us to be the Son of God; yea, I know that these things were taught unto you bountifully before your dissension from among us" (Alma 34:2; emphasis added).

 

The coming of Christ and the particulars of his mission and message were taught bountifully throughout the entire course of the Book of Mormon. It should not be surprising that the book as we now have it begins with a vision of "One descending out of the midst of heaven, and he beheld that his luster was above that of the sun at noon-day" (1 Nephi 1:9). This vision of the premortal Christ, accompanied in spirit by "twelve others," brought forth a book in which Lehi was bidden to read. The book spoke of "many great and marvelous things," including the plain declaration "of the coming of a Messiah, and also the redemption of the world" (1 Nephi 1:14, 19).

 

From these opening passages onward, the Book of Mormon speaks continually of Christ before his mortal birth, during his sojourn both among the Jews and the Nephites, and in his postmortal rule and reign in the eternities that follow. Even though his contemporaries in Jerusalem rejected that message given by Lehi, that great prophet nevertheless continued his prophecies of "a Messiah, or, in other words, a Savior of the world" (1 Nephi 10:4). Included in Lehi's very specific knowledge of the coming of Christ to mortality were such revelatory details as a vision that the Messiah would be slain and "should rise from the dead, and should make himself manifest, by the Holy Ghost, unto the Gentiles" (1 Nephi 10:11).

 

Whether it was this kind of revelation or something even more definitive (a personal appearance of Christ?) we do not know, but Lehi obviously had some very special manifestations regarding the Son of God. Shortly before his death, he testified to his sons: "Behold, the Lord hath redeemed my soul from hell; I have beheld his glory, and I am encircled about eternally in the arms of his love" (2 Nephi 1:15; emphasis added).

 

As early as Nephi's writings we learn the name which the Messiah shall carry, but that same Nephi is quick to acknowledge that other ancient prophets knew the name as well. "For according to the words of the prophets," he writes, "the Messiah cometh in six hundred years from the time that my father left Jerusalem; and according to the words of the prophets, and also the word of the angel of God, his name shall be Jesus Christ, the Son of God" (2 Nephi 25:19).

 

Nephi's brother Jacob follows that acknowledgment with a powerful testimony of the breadth of revelation and widespread knowledge of Christ that had been given to those ancient prophets. He wrote: "For this intent have we written these things, that they may know that we knew of Christ, and we had a hope of his glory many hundred years before his coming; and not only we ourselves had a hope of his glory, but also all the holy prophets which were before us.

 

"Behold, they believed in Christ and worshiped the Father in his name, and also we worship the Father in his name. And for this intent we keep the law of Moses, it pointing our souls to him. . . .

 

"Wherefore, we search the prophets, and we have many revelations and the spirit of prophecy; and having all these witnesses we obtain a hope, and our faith becometh unshaken, insomuch that we truly can command in the name of Jesus and the very trees obey us, or the mountains, or the waves of the sea" (Jacob 4:4-6).

 

In that bold and persuasive spirit he pleads with his brethren: "Behold, will ye reject these words? Will ye reject the words of the prophets; and will ye reject all the words which have been spoken concerning Christ, after so many have spoken concerning him; and deny the good word of Christ, and the power of God, and the gift of the Holy Ghost, and quench the Holy Spirit, and make a mock of the great plan of redemption, which hath been laid for you?" (Jacob 6:8-9).

 

But soon enough one came doing exactly those things, Sherem, the first of the anti-Christs in the Book of Mormon. Sherem came declaring "that there should be no Christ" and in every way attempted to "overthrow the doctrine of Christ" (Jacob 7:2). Knowing that Jacob "had faith in Christ who should come," Sherem sardoni-cally made particular effort to confront and challenge him on the practice of what Sherem called "preaching that which ye call the gospel, or the doctrine of Christ" (Jacob 7:3, 6). His argument was based on the feeble and tediously predictable reasoning of all anti-Christs—that "no man knoweth of such things; for he cannot tell of things to come" (Jacob 7:7).

 

Of Sherem, Jacob asks: "Believest thou the scriptures? And he said, Yea. And I said unto him: Then ye do not understand them; for they truly testify of Christ. Behold, I say unto you that none of the prophets have written, nor prophesied, save they have spoken concerning this Christ" (Jacob 7:10-11).

 

One of the greatest of those prophets in the Book of Mormon—indeed, a very strong case could be made for calling him the greatest of the prophets in the Book of Mormon—goes unnamed in the record that documents Christ's remarkable life. That prophet is identified to the modern reader only as "the brother of Jared." Yet even in such near anonymity, the revelation that unfolded before this man's eyes was so extraordinary that his life and legacy to us have become synonymous with bold, consummate, perfect faith.

 

In the dispersion required of them at the time of the Tower of Babel, the people of Jared arrived at "the great sea which divideth the lands" (Ether 2:13) where they pitched their tents, awaiting further revelation regarding the crossing of a mighty ocean. For four years they awaited divine direction, but apparently they waited too casually—without supplication and exertion. Then this rather remarkable moment presented itself:

 

"And it came to pass at the end of four years that the Lord came again unto the brother of Jared, and stood in a cloud and talked with him. And for the space of three hours did the Lord talk with the brother of Jared, and chastened him because he remembered not to call upon the name of the Lord" (Ether 2:14).

 

It is difficult to imagine what a three-hour rebuke from the Lord might be like, but the brother of Jared endured it. With immediate repentance and immediate prayer, this prophet once again sought guidance for the journey they had been assigned and for those who were to pursue it. God accepted his repentance and lovingly gave further direction for this crucial mission.

 

For such an oceanic crossing these families and their flocks needed seaworthy crafts similar to the barges they had constructed for earlier water travel—small, light, dish-shaped vessels identical in design above and beneath so that they were capable of staying afloat even when facing overwhelming waves or, worse yet, when they might be overturned by them. These "exceedingly tight" crafts (Ether 2:17) were obviously boats of unprecedented design and undiminished capability, made under the direction of him who ruled the seas and the winds that rend them to the end that the vessels might travel with the "lightness of a fowl upon the water" (Ether 2:16).

 

These were miraculously designed and meticulously constructed ships. But they had one major, seemingly insoluble limitation. In such a tight, seaworthy design, there was no means of allowing light for the seafarers who would travel in them. "The brother of Jared . . . cried again unto the Lord saying: O Lord, behold I have done even as thou hast commanded me; and I have prepared the vessels for my people, and behold there is no light in them. Behold, O Lord, wilt thou suffer that we shall cross this great water in darkness?" (Ether 2:21-22).

 

Then comes an extraordinary and unexpected response from the Creator of heaven and earth and all things that in them are, he who boldly declared to Abraham, "Is anything too great for the Lord?" (Genesis 18:14).

 

"And the Lord said unto the brother of Jared: What will ye that I should do that ye may have light in your vessels?" (Ether 2:23; emphasis added). Then, as if such a disarming inquiry from omnipotent Deity is not enough, the Lord proceeds to verbalize the very problems that the brother of Jared already knows only too well.

 

"For behold, ye cannot have windows, for they will be dashed in pieces; neither shall ye take fire with you, for ye shall not go by the light of fire.

 

"For behold, ye shall be as a whale in the midst of the sea; for the mountain waves shall dash upon you. . . . Therefore what will ye that I should prepare for you that ye may have light when ye are swallowed up in the depths of the sea?" (Ether 2:23-25; emphasis added).

 

Clearly the brother of Jared was being tested. The Lord had done his part—miraculously, profoundly, ingeniously. Unique, resolutely seaworthy ships for crossing the ocean had been provided. The brilliant engineering had been done. The hard part of this construction project was over. Now he wanted to know what the brother of Jared would do about incidentals.

 

After what was undoubtedly a great deal of soul-searching and head-scratching, the brother of Jared came before the Lord—perhaps red-faced but not empty-handed. In a clearly apologetic tone, he says: "Now behold, O Lord, and do not be angry with thy servant because of his weakness before thee; for we know that thou art holy and dwellest in the heavens, and that we are unworthy before thee; because of the fall our natures have become evil continually; nevertheless, O Lord, thou hast given us a commandment that we must call upon thee, that from thee we may receive according to our desires.

 

"Behold, O Lord, thou hast smitten us because of our iniquity, and hast driven us forth, and for these many years we have been in the wilderness; nevertheless, thou hast been merciful unto us. O Lord, look upon me in pity, and turn away thine anger from this thy people, and suffer not that they shall go forth across this raging deep in darkness; but behold these things which I have molten out of the rock" (Ether 3:2-3).

 

Things. The brother of Jared hardly knows what to call them. Rocks probably doesn't sound any more inspiring. Here, standing next to the Lord's magnificent handiwork, these ne plus ultra, impeccably designed, and marvelously unique seagoing barges, the brother of Jared offers for his contribution rocks. As he eyes the sleek ships the Lord has provided, it is a moment of genuine humility.

 

He hurries on. "And I know, O Lord, that thou hast all power, and can do whatsoever thou wilt for the benefit of man; therefore touch these stones, O Lord, with thy finger, and prepare them that they may shine forth in darkness; and they shall shine forth unto us in the vessels which we have prepared, that we may have light while we shall cross the sea.

 

"Behold, O Lord, thou canst do this. We know that thou art able to show forth great power, which looks small unto the understanding of men" (Ether 3:4-5).

 

For all of his self-abasement, the faith of the brother of Jared is apparent. In fact, we might better say transparent in light of the purpose for which these stones will be used. Surely God, as well as the reader, feels something very striking in the childlike innocence and fervor of this man's faith. "Behold, O Lord, thou canst do this." Perhaps there is no more powerful, single line of faith spoken by man in scripture. It is almost as if he is encouraging God, emboldening him, reassuring him. Not "Behold, O Lord, I am sure that thou canst do this." Not "Behold, O Lord, thou hast done many greater things than this." However uncertain the prophet is about his own ability, he has no uncertainty about God's power. There is nothing here but a single, clear, bold, and assertive declaration with no hint or element of vacillation. It is encouragement to Him who needs no encouragement but who surely must have been touched by it. "Behold, O Lord, thou canst do this."

 

What happened next ranks among the greatest moments in recorded history, surely among the greatest moments in recorded faith. It establishes the brother of Jared among the greatest of God's prophets forever. As the Lord reaches forth to touch the stones one by one with his finger—a response, it would seem, coming in undeniable response to the commanding faith of the brother of Jared—"the veil was taken from off the eyes of the brother of Jared, and he saw the finger of the Lord; and it was as the finger of a man, like unto flesh and blood; and the brother of Jared fell down before the Lord, for he was struck with fear" (Ether 3:6).

 

The Lord, seeing the brother of Jared fall to the earth, commands him to rise and asks, "Why hast thou fallen?" (Ether 3:7).

 

The reply: "I saw the finger of the Lord, and I feared lest he should smite me; for I knew not that the Lord had flesh and blood" (Ether 3:8).

 

Then this marvelous declaration from the Lord: "Because of thy faith thou hast seen that I shall take upon me flesh and blood; and never has man come before me with such exceeding faith as thou hast; for were it not so ye could not have seen my finger. Sawest thou more than this?" (Ether 3:9).

 

The brother of Jared answers, "Nay; Lord, show thyself unto me" (Ether 3:6-10). The Lord removed the veil completely from the eyes of the brother of Jared and came into full view of this resolutely faithful man.

 

Then this most remarkable revelation of the premortal Jehovah: "Behold, I am he who was prepared from the foundation of the world to redeem my people," he said. "Behold, I am Jesus Christ. I am the Father and the Son. In me shall all mankind have life, and that eternally, even they who shall believe on my name; and they shall become my sons and my daughters.

 

"And never have I showed myself unto man whom I have created, for never has man believed in me as thou hast. Seest thou that ye are created after mine own image? Yea, even all men were created in the beginning after my own image.

 

"Behold, this body, which ye now behold, is the body of my spirit; and man have I created after the body of my spirit; and even as I appear unto thee to be in the spirit will I appear unto my people in the flesh" (Ether 3:14-16).

 

Before examining the doctrinal truths taught in this divine encounter, it will be useful to note two seemingly problematic issues here, issues that would seem to have reasonable and acceptable resolutions.

 

The first issue is suggested in two questions the Lord asks the brother of Jared during the vision as it unfolds: "Why hast thou fallen?" and "Sawest thou more than this?" It is a basic premise of Latter-day Saint theology that God "knoweth all things, and there is not anything save he knows it" (2 Nephi 9:20). The scriptures, both ancient and modern, are replete with this assertion of omniscience. Nevertheless, God has frequently asked questions of men, usually as a way to test their faith, measure their honesty, or allow their knowledge greater development. For example, he called unto Adam in the Garden of Eden, "Where art thou?" and later asks Eve, "What is this that thou hast done?" (Genesis 3:9, 13), yet an omniscient parent clearly knew the answer to both questions, for he could see where Adam was and he watched what Eve had done. It is obvious that the questions are for the children's sake, giving Adam and Eve the responsibility of replying honestly. Later, in trying Abraham's faith, God repeatedly called out regarding Abraham's whereabouts, to which the faithful patriarch would answer: "Here am I" (Genesis 22:11). The purpose in this scriptural moment was not to provide God with information he already knew but to reaffirm Abraham's fixed faith and unwavering position in the most difficult of all parental tests. These kinds of rhetorical questions are frequently used by God, particularly in assessing faith, honesty, and the full measure of agency, allowing the "students" the freedom and opportunity to express themselves as revealingly as they wish, even though God knows the answer to his own and all other questions.

 

The second issue that requires preliminary comment stems from the Lord's exclamation, "Never has man come before me with such exceeding faith as thou hast; for were it not so ye could not have seen my finger" (Ether 3:9). And later, "Never have I showed myself unto man whom I have created, for never has man believed in me as thou hast" (Ether 3:15). The potential for confusion here comes with the realization that many—indeed, we would assume all—of the Major Prophets living prior to the brother of Jared had seen God. How then does one account for the Lord's declaration? Adam's face-to-face conversations with God in the Garden of Eden can be exempted because of the paradisiacal, prefallen state of that setting and relationship. Furthermore, other prophets' visions of God, such as Moses and Isaiah in the Bible, or Nephi and Jacob in the Book of Mormon, came after this "never before" experience of the brother of Jared. But before the era of the Tower of Babel, the Lord did appear unto Adam and "the residue of his posterity who were righteous" in the valley of Adam-ondi-Ahman three years before Adam's death (see D&C 107:53-55). And we are left with Enoch, who said very explicitly, "I saw the Lord; and he stood before my face, and he talked with me, even as a man talketh one with another, face to face" (Moses 7:4). We assume there would have been other prophets living in the period between Adam's leaving the Garden of Eden and the building of the Tower of Babel who also saw God in a similar manner, including Noah who "found grace in the eyes of the Lord" and "walked with God" (Genesis 6:8-9), the same scriptural phrase used to describe Enoch's relationship with the Lord (see Genesis 5:24).

 

This issue has been much discussed by Latter-day Saint writers, and there are several possible explanations, any one—or all—of which may cast some light upon the larger truth of this passage. Nevertheless, without additional scriptural revelation or commentary on the matter, any conjecture is only that—conjecture—and as such is inadequate and incomplete.

 

One possibility is that this is simply a comment made in the context of one dispensation and as such applies only to the Jaredites and Jaredite prophets—that Jehovah has never before revealed himself to one of their seers and revelators. Obviously this theory has severe limitations when measured against such phrases as "never before" and "never has man" and combined with the realization that Jared and his brother are the fathers of this dispensation, the first to whom God could have revealed himself in their era.

 

Another suggestion is that the lowercase reference to "man" is the key to this passage, suggesting that the Lord has never revealed himself to the unsanctified, to the nonbeliever, to temporal, earthy, natural man. The implication here is that only those who have put off the natural man, only those who are untainted by the world—in short, the sanctified (such as Adam, Enoch, and now the brother of Jared)—are entitled to this privilege.

 

Some have believed that the Lord here means he had never before revealed himself to this degree or to this extent. This theory would suggest that divine appearances to earlier prophets had not been with this same "fulness," that never before had the veil been lifted to give such a complete revelation of Christ's nature and being.

 

A further possibility is that this is the first time Jehovah has appeared and identified himself as Jesus Christ, the Son of God, thus the interpretation of the passage being "never have I showed myself [as Jesus Christ] unto man whom I have created" (Ether 3:15). This possibility is reinforced by one way of reading Moroni's later editorial comment: "Having this perfect knowledge of God, he could not be kept from within the veil; therefore he saw Jesus" (Ether 3:20; emphasis added).

 

Yet another interpretation of this passage is that the faith of the brother of Jared was so great he saw not only the spirit finger and body of the premortal Jesus (which presumably many other prophets had also seen) but also had some distinctly more revealing aspect of Christ's body of flesh, blood, and bone. Exactly what insight into the flesh-and-blood nature of Christ's future body the brother of Jared might have had is not clear, but Jehovah does say to him, "Because of thy faith thou hast seen that I shall take upon me flesh and blood" (Ether 3:9), and Moroni does say that Christ revealed himself in this instance "in the likeness of the same body even as he showed himself unto the Nephites" (Ether 3:17). Some have taken that to mean literally "the same body" the Nephites would see—a body of flesh and blood. A safer position would be that it was at least the exact spiritual likeness of that future body. Jehovah says, "Behold, this body, which ye now behold, is the body of my spirit . . . and even as I appear unto thee to be in the spirit will I appear unto my people in the flesh" (Ether 3:16), and Moroni says, "Jesus showed himself unto this man in the spirit" (Ether 3:17).

 

A final—and in terms of the faith of the brother of Jared (which is the issue at hand) surely the most persuasive—explanation for me is that Christ is saying to the brother of Jared, 'Never have I showed myself unto man in this manner, without my volition, driven solely by the faith of the beholder.' As a rule, prophets are invited into the presence of the Lord, are bidden to enter his presence by him and only with his sanction. The brother of Jared, on the other hand, stands alone then (and we assume now) in having thrust himself through the veil, not as an unwelcome guest but perhaps technically an uninvited one. Says Jehovah, "Never has man come before me with such exceeding faith as thou hast; for were it not so ye could not have seen my finger. . . . Never has man believed in me as thou hast" (Ether 3:9, 15; emphasis added). Obviously the Lord himself is linking unprecedented faith with this unprecedented vision. If the vision is not unique, then it has to be the faith—and how the vision is obtained—that is so remarkable. The only way this faith could be so remarkable would be in its ability to take this prophet, uninvited, where others had only been able to go by invitation.

 

Indeed it would appear that this is Moroni's own understanding of the circumstance, for he later writes, "Because of the knowledge [which has come as a result of faith] of this man he could not be kept from beholding within the veil. . . . Wherefore, having this perfect knowledge of God, he could not be kept from within the veil; therefore he saw Jesus" (Ether 3:19-20; emphasis added).

 

This may be one of those very provocative examples (except that it is real life and not hypothetical) about God's power. Schoolboy philosophers sometimes ask, "Can God make a rock so heavy that he cannot lift it?" or "Can God hide an item so skillfully that he cannot find it?" Far more movingly and importantly we may ask here, "Could God have stopped the brother of Jared from seeing through the veil?" At first blush one is inclined to say, "Surely God could block such an experience if he wished to." But think again. Or, more precisely, read again. "This man . . . could not be kept from beholding within the veil . . . he could not be kept from within the veil" (Ether 3:19-20; emphasis added).

 

No, this may be an absolutely unprecedented case of a prophet's will and faith and purity so closely approaching that of heaven's that the man moves from understanding God to being actually like him, with his same thrust of will and faith, at least in this one instance. What a remarkable doctrinal statement about the power of a mortal man's faith! And not an ethereal, unreachable, select category of a man, either. This is one who once forgot to call upon the Lord, one whose best ideas focused on rocks, and one who doesn't even have a traditional name in the book that has immortalized his remarkable feat of faith. Given such a man with such faith, it should not be surprising that the Lord would show this prophet much, show him visions that would be relevant to the mission of all the Book of Mormon prophets and to the events of the latter-day dispensation in which the book would be received.

 

After the prophet stepped through the veil to behold the Savior of the world, he was not limited in seeing the rest of what the eternal world revealed. Indeed, the Lord showed him "all the inhabitants of the earth which had been, and also all that would be; and he withheld them not from his sight, even unto the ends of the earth" (Ether 3:25). The staying power for such an experience was once again the faith of the brother of Jared, for "the Lord could not withhold anything from him, for he knew that the Lord could show him all things" (Ether 3:26).

 

This vision of "all the inhabitants of the earth which had been, and also all that would be . . . even unto the ends of the earth" (Ether 3:25) was similar to that given to Moses and other of the prophets (see Moses 1:27-29). In this case, however, it was written down in great detail and then sealed up. Moroni, who had access to this recorded vision, wrote on his plates "the very things which the brother of Jared saw" (Ether 4:4). Then he, too, sealed them up and hid them again in the earth before his death and the final destruction of the Nephite civilization. Of this vision given to the brother of Jared, Moroni wrote, "There never were greater things made manifest than those which were made manifest unto the brother of Jared" (Ether 4:4).

 

Those sealed plates constitute the sealed portion of the Book of Mormon which Joseph Smith did not translate. Furthermore they will remain sealed, literally as well as figuratively, until "they shall exercise faith in me, saith the Lord, even as the brother of Jared did, that they may become sanctified in me, then will I manifest unto them the things which the brother of Jared saw, even to the unfolding unto them all my revelations, saith Jesus Christ, the Son of God, the Father of the heavens and of the earth, and all things that in them are" (Ether 4:7).

 

The full measure of this unprecedented and unexcelled vision—"there never were greater things made manifest"—are yet to be made known to the children of men. But consider what was made known in one man's experience in receiving it, consider that the time was approximately two thousand years before Christ's birth, and consider what is not presently contained in the Old Testament canon of that period regarding Jehovah and his true characteristics. These twenty-five items are all drawn from Ether 3 and 4:

 

1. Jehovah, the God of the pre-Christian era, was the premortal Jesus Christ, identified here by that name (see Ether 3:14).

 

2. Christ is both a Father and a Son in his divine relationship with the children of men (see Ether 3:14).

 

3. Christ was "prepared from the foundation of the world to redeem [his] people" (Ether 3:14), knowledge which had been shared before with Enoch and later would be shared with John the Revelator (see Moses 7:47; Revelation 13:8).

 

4. Christ had a spirit body, which looked like and was in the premortal form of his physical body, like "unto flesh and blood," including fingers, voice, face, and all other physical features (Ether 3:6).

 

5. Christ assisted in the creation of man, fashioning the human family "after the body of my spirit" (Ether 3:16).

 

6. With a spirit body and the divinity of his calling, the premortal Christ spoke audibly, in words and language understood by mortals (see Ether 3:16).

 

7. Christ is a God, acting for and with his Father, who is also a God (see Ether 3:14; 4:7).

 

8. Christ reveals some truths to some that are to be kept until an appointed time (his "own due time") from others (see Ether 3:24).

 

9. Christ uses a variety of tools and techniques in revelation, including the interpreting power of "two stones" such as those used in the Urim and Thummim (see Ether 3:23; D&C 17:1).

 

10. Christ's later atoning, redeeming role is clearly stated even before it has been realized in his mortal life. Furthermore, in a most blessed way for the brother of Jared, it is immediately efficacious. "I am he who was prepared from the foundation of the world to redeem my people," Christ says. "In me shall all mankind have life, and that eternally, even they who shall believe on my name; and they shall become my sons and my daughters" (Ether 3:14).

 

Then the brother of Jared has his redemption pronounced, as though the Atonement had already been carried out. "Because thou knowest these things ye are redeemed from the fall," Christ promises him, "therefore ye are brought back into my presence; therefore I show myself unto you" (Ether 3:13).

 

This statement underscores the eternal nature of the Atonement, its effects reaching out to all those who lived before the Savior's birth as well as all those living after it. All who in Old Testament times were baptized in Christ's name had the same claim upon eternal life that the brother of Jared had, even though Christ had not yet even been born. In matters of the Atonement, as in all other eternal promises, "time only is measured unto men" (Alma 40:8).

 

11. Christ had past knowledge of all the inhabitants of the earth which had been and foreknowledge of all that would be, showing all of these to the brother of Jared (see Ether 3:25).

 

Moroni, in recording the experience of the brother of Jared, adds these insights and revelations which come from the same encounter:

 

12. Future Saints will need to be sanctified in Christ to receive all of his revelations (see Ether 4:6).

 

13. Those who reject the vision of the brother of Jared will be shown "no greater things" by Christ (Ether 4:8).

 

14. At Christ's command "the heavens are opened and are shut," "the earth shall shake," and "the inhabitants thereof shall pass away, even so as by fire" (Ether 4:9).

 

15. Believers in the vision of the brother of Jared will be given manifestations of Christ's spirit. Because of such spiritual experience, belief shall turn to knowledge and those "shall know that these things are true" (Ether 4:11).

 

16. "Whatsoever thing persuadeth men to do good" is of Christ. Good comes of none except Christ (Ether 4:12).

 

17. Those who do not believe Christ's words would not believe him personally (see Ether 4:12).

 

18. Those who do not believe Christ would not believe God the Father who sent him (see Ether 4:12).

 

19. Christ is the light and the life and the truth of the world (see Ether 4:12).

 

20. Christ will reveal "greater things" (Ether 4:13), "great and marvelous things" (Ether 4:15), knowledge hidden "from the foundation of the world" (Ether 4:14) to those who rend the veil of unbelief and come unto him.

 

21. Believers are to call upon the Father in the name of Christ "with a broken heart and a contrite spirit" if they are to "know that the Father hath remembered the covenant which he made" unto the house of Israel (Ether 4:15).

 

22. Christ's revelations to John the Revelator will be "unfolded in the eyes of all the people" in the last days, even as they are about to be fulfilled (Ether 4:16).

 

23. Christ commands all the ends of the earth to come unto him, believe in his gospel, and be baptized in his name (see Ether 4:18).

 

24. Signs shall follow those that believe in Christ's name (see Ether 4:18).

 

25. Those faithful to Christ's name at the last day shall be "lifted up to dwell in the kingdom prepared for [them] from the foundation of the world" (Ether 4:19).

 

Indeed, an appeal like that of the brother of Jared is given by the Father to both Gentile and Israelite, to whom this record is sent. Asking the latter-day reader to pierce the limits of shallow faith, Christ cries:

 

"Come unto me, O ye Gentiles, and I will show unto you the greater things, the knowledge which is hid up because of unbelief.

 

"Come unto me, O ye house of Israel, and it shall be made manifest unto you how great things the Father hath laid up for you, from the foundation of the world; and it hath not come unto you, because of unbelief.

 

"Behold, when ye shall rend that veil of unbelief which doth cause you to remain in your awful state of wickedness, and hardness of heart, and blindness of mind, then shall the great and marvelous things which have been hid up from the foundation of the world from you—yea when ye shall call upon the Father in my name, with a broken heart and a contrite spirit, then shall ye know that the Father hath remembered the covenant which he made unto your fathers, O house of Israel" (Ether 4:13-15).

 

The Book of Mormon is predicated on the willingness of men and women to "rend the veil of unbelief" in order to behold the revelations—and the Revelation—of God (Ether 4:15). It would seem that the humbling experience of the brother of Jared in his failure to pray and his consternation over the sixteen stones were included in this account to show just how mortal and just how normal he was—so very much like the men and women we know and at least in some ways so much like ourselves. His belief in himself and his view of himself may have been limited—much like our view of ourselves. But his belief in God was unprecedented. It was without doubt or limit: "I know, O Lord, that thou hast all power, and can do whatsoever thou wilt for the benefit of man; therefore touch these stones, O Lord, with thy finger" (Ether 3:4).

 

And from that command given to the Lord, for it does seem to be something of a command, the brother of Jared and the reader of the Book of Mormon would never be the same again. Ordinary individuals with ordinary challenges could rend the veil of unbelief and enter the realms of eternity. And Christ, who was prepared from the foundation of the world to redeem his people, would be standing at the edge of that veil to usher the believer through.

 

 

(Nurturing Faith through the Book of Mormon: The 24th Annual Sidney B. Sperry Symposium [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1995], 1.)

How do we receive the power to become sons and daughters of God?  What does that mean versus sons and daughters of man? 

(Doctrine and Covenants 25:1.)

 

1 Hearken unto the voice of the Lord your God, while I speak unto you, Emma Smith, my daughter; for verily I say unto you, all those who receive my gospel are sons and daughters in my kingdom.

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 84:34.)

 

34 They become the sons of Moses and of Aaron and the seed of Abraham, and the church and kingdom, and the elect of God.

 

(Ephesians 1:4-6.)

 

4 According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love:

 

5 Having predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himself, according to the good pleasure of his will,

 

6 To the praise of the glory of his grace, wherein he hath made us accepted in the beloved.

 

(John 1:12.)

 

12 But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name:

 

Jesus Christ is the King of kings. He not only presides over the leaders of nations and earthly monarchs but, more particularly, over those who have matured spiritually in the powers and ordinances of the gospel. We come unto Christ, first of all, through an authorized baptism, and then we receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. If we live worthy of the Comforter, we are born again as to the things of righteousness; we die as to the ways of the world and are quickened as to the matters of the Spirit. We become the sons and daughters of Jesus Christ by adoption. As we qualify for entrance into the holy temple, we take upon ourselves greater obligations and open ourselves to new vistas of understanding, perspective, and priesthood power. Through obedience to the ordinances of the temple, we become sons and daughters of God, meaning the Father. Brigham Young explained: “When the Holy Priesthood, which is after the order of the Son of God, is upon the earth, and its organizations, ordinances, gospel, powers, authorities and blessings, are enjoyed by the children of men; then by means of sealing powers and keys, and an everlasting covenant, the sons of men become the sons of God by regeneration, and are entitled, every man in his order, to the privileges, exaltations, principalities and powers, kingdoms and thrones, which are held and enjoyed, by the Great Father of our race.” (In Journal of Discourses 10:355.)

 

 

(Joseph Fielding McConkie, Joseph Smith: The Choice Seer [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1996],.)

Adam and Jesus Christ are the only 2 individuals called “the Son of God”, Moses 6:22, this was the case with Adam until he fell, when he suffered spiritual death being cast out of Gods presence.

 

 

(2 Nephi 9:6-10.)

 

6 For as death hath passed upon all men, to fulfil the merciful plan of the great Creator, there must needs be a power of resurrection, and the resurrection must needs come unto man by reason of the fall; and the fall came by reason of transgression; and because man became fallen they were cut off from the presence of the Lord.

 

7 Wherefore, it must needs be an infinite atonement—save it should be an infinite atonement this corruption could not put on incorruption. Wherefore, the first judgment which came upon man must needs have remained to an endless duration. And if so, this flesh must have laid down to rot and to crumble to its mother earth, to rise no more.

 

8 O the wisdom of God, his mercy and grace! For behold, if the flesh should rise no more our spirits must become subject to that angel who fell from before the presence of the Eternal God, and became the devil, to rise no more.

 

9 And our spirits must have become like unto him, and we become devils, angels to a devil, to be shut out from the presence of our God, and to remain with the father of lies, in misery, like unto himself; yea, to that being who beguiled our first parents, who transformeth himself nigh unto an angel of light, and stirreth up the children of men unto secret combinations of murder and all manner of secret works of darkness.

 

10 O how great the goodness of our God, who prepareth a way for our escape from the grasp of this awful monster; yea, that monster, death and hell, which I call the death of the body, and also the death of the spirit.

 

We need a Redeemer to get back; it is through all of the ordinances of the gospel that helps us on this journey, “there is no other way”, Teachings 162, Articles of Faith #3.  Some choose to obey others do not, just like pre mortality

 

(Moses 7:1.)

 

1 And it came to pass that Enoch continued his speech, saying: Behold, our father Adam taught these things, and many have believed and become the sons of God, and many have believed not, and have perished in their sins, and are looking forth with fear, in torment, for the fiery indignation of the wrath of God to be poured out upon them.

 

(Moses 8:13-15.)

 

13 And Noah and his sons hearkened unto the Lord, and gave heed, and they were called the sons of God.

 

14 And when these men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them, the sons of men saw that those daughters were fair, and they took them wives, even as they chose.

 

15 And the Lord said unto Noah: The daughters of thy sons have sold themselves; for behold mine anger is kindled against the sons of men, for they will not hearken to my voice.

 

Noah’s granddaughters rejected the gospel message and married outside of the eternal marriage covenant by uniting with the sons of men, thus they forfeited the power to become sons and daughter of God!   They apostatized from the truth.  Think of Abraham finding a wife for Isaac, teach our children the critical importance of who to marry and where!!

 

Now we have the story of the beginning of the Book of Ether, the Tower of Babel Believers versus Non-Believers

 

The story of Adam and Eve being spiritually reborn and becoming a son and daughter of God, they are redeemed from their fallen condition.  Also, according to President Benson, verse 67 the fulness of the Melchizedek priesthood (after the order of Christ) is to receive all of the temple ordinances and make the necessary covenants to receive through faithfulness exaltation in the Celestial kingdom

 

 

(Moses 6:64-68.) – The process of spiritual rebirth, only through the ordinances.

 

64 And it came to pass, when the Lord had spoken with Adam, our father, that Adam cried unto the Lord, and he was caught away by the Spirit of the Lord, and was carried down into the water, and was laid under the water, and was brought forth out of the water.

 

65 And thus he was baptized, and the Spirit of God descended upon him, and thus he was born of the Spirit, and became quickened in the inner man.

 

66 And he heard a voice out of heaven, saying: Thou art baptized with fire, and with the Holy Ghost. This is the record of the Father, and the Son, from henceforth and forever;

 

67 And thou art after the order of him who was without beginning of days or end of years, from all eternity to all eternity.

 

68 Behold, thou art one in me, a son of God; and thus may all become my sons. Amen.

 

 

President Benson, Ensign, August 1985, What I hope You Will Teach Your Children about the Temple

I believe a proper understanding or background will immeasurably help prepare our youth for the temple. This understanding, I believe, will foster within them a desire to seek their priesthood blessings just as Abraham sought his.

When our Heavenly Father placed Adam and Eve on this earth, He did so with the purpose in mind of teaching them how to regain His presence. Our Father promised a Savior to redeem them from their fallen condition. He gave to them the plan of salvation and told them to teach their children faith in Jesus Christ and repentance. Further, Adam and his posterity were commanded by God to be baptized, to receive the Holy Ghost, and to enter into the order of the Son of God.

To enter into the order of the Son of God is the equivalent today of entering into the fullness of the Melchizedek Priesthood, which is only received in the house of the Lord.

Because Adam and Eve had complied with these requirements, God said to them, "Thou art after the order of him who was without beginning of days or end of years, from all eternity to all eternity." (Moses 6:67.)

Three years before Adam's death, a great event occurred. He took his son Seth, his grandson Enos, and other high priests who were his direct-line descendants, with others of his righteous posterity, into a valley called Adam-ondi-Ahman. There Adam gave to these righteous descendants his last blessing.

The Lord then appeared to them.

The vast congregation rose up and blessed Adam and called him Michael, the prince and archangel. The Lord himself declared Adam to be a prince forever over his own posterity.

Then Adam in his aged condition rose up and, being filled with the spirit of prophecy, predicted "whatsoever should befall his posterity unto the latest generation." All this is recorded in section 107 of the Doctrine and Covenants (verses 53-56) [D&C 107:53-56].

The Prophet Joseph Smith said that Adam blessed his posterity because "he wanted to bring them into the presence of God." (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, sel. Joseph Fielding Smith, Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1938, p. 159.)

Here is an illuminating passage from Section 107 of the Doctrine and Covenants which tells us how Adam was able to bring himself and his righteous posterity into God's presence:

"The order of this priesthood was confirmed to be handed down from father to son, and tightly belongs to the literal descendants of the chosen seed, to whom the promises were made.

"This order was instituted in the days of Adam, and came down by lineage in [order] … that his posterity should be the chosen of the Lord, and that they should be preserved unto the end of the earth." (D&C 107:40-42; italics added.)

 

How did Adam bring his descendants into the presence of the Lord?

The answer: Adam and his descendants entered into the priesthood order of God. Today we would say they went to the House of the Lord and received their blessings.

The order of priesthood spoken of in the scriptures is sometimes referred to as the patriarchal order because it came down from father to son.

But this order is otherwise described in modern revelation as an order of family government where a man and woman enter into a covenant with God--just as did Adam and Eve--to be sealed for eternity, to have posterity, and to do the will and work of God throughout their mortality.

If a couple are true to their covenants, they are entitled to the blessing of the highest degree of the celestial kingdom. These covenants today can only be entered into by going to the House of the Lord.

Adam followed this order and brought his posterity into the presence of God. He is the great example for us to follow.

Enoch followed this pattern and brought the Saints of his day into the presence of God.

Noah and his son Shem likewise followed the same pattern after the flood.

Abraham, a righteous servant of God, desiring as he said, "to be a greater follower of righteousness," sought for these same blessings. Speaking of the order of the priesthood, he said: "It was conferred upon me from the fathers; it came down from the fathers, from the beginning of time … even the right of the firstborn, or the first man, who is Adam, our first father, through the fathers unto me." (Abr. 1:2-3.)

So Abraham declared: "I sought for mine appointment unto the Priesthood according to the appointment of God unto the fathers." (Abr. 1:4.)

Moses taught this order of priesthood to his people and "sought diligently to sanctify his people that they might behold the face of God;

"But they hardened their hearts and could not endure his presence; therefore, the Lord in his wrath, for his anger was kindled against them, swore that they should not enter into his rest while in the wilderness, which rest is the fulness of his glory.

"Therefore, he took Moses out of their midst, and the Holy Priesthood also." (D&C 84:23-25.)

We learn through the Joseph Smith Translation that the Lord further instructed Moses: "I will take away the priesthood out of their midst; therefore my holy order, and the ordinances thereof." (JST Ex. 34:1; italics added.)

This higher priesthood, with its attendant ordinances, was taken from Israel till the time of Jesus Christ.

My purpose in citing this background is to illustrate that this order of priesthood has been on the earth since the beginning, and it is the only means by which we can one day see the face of God and live. (See D&C 84:22.)

Between Moses and Christ only certain prophets possessed the right to the higher priesthood and the blessings that could bring men into the presence of God. One of these prophets was Elijah.

Elijah held the keys of the sealing power and did many mighty miracles in his day. He had power to seal the heavens, raise the dead, relieve the drought-stricken land, and call down fire from heaven.

He was the last prophet to hold the keys of the priesthood, according to the Prophet Joseph Smith. He was subsequently translated and taken up into heaven without tasting death.

He, as a translated being, restored the keys of this priesthood to the Savior's chief Apostles--Peter, James, and John--on the Mount of Transfiguration. But within a generation, the Church was destroyed by a major apostasy, and the blessings of the priesthood were removed from the earth.

It took a new dispensation from heaven to restore this blessing to our day.

It is significant that the first revelation given in 1823, recorded as section 2 of the Doctrine and Covenants, gave this promise about the priesthood:

"Behold, I will reveal unto you the Priesthood, by the hand of Elijah the prophet, before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the Lord.

"And he shall plant in the hearts of the children the promises made to the fathers, and the hearts of the children shall turn to their fathers.

"If it were not so, the whole earth would be utterly wasted at his coming." (D&C 2:1-3.)

What priesthood was Elijah to reveal? John the Baptist restored the keys to the Aaronic Priesthood. Peter, James, and John restored the keys of the kingdom of God. Why send Elijah?

"Because he holds the keys of the authority to administer in all the ordinances of the priesthood," or the sealing power. (Teachings, p. 172; italics added.) So said the Prophet Joseph Smith!

The Prophet Joseph said further that these keys were "the revelations, ordinances, oracles, powers and endowments of the fulness of the Melchizedek Priesthood and of the kingdom of God on the earth." (Teachings, p. 337; italics added.)

Even though the Aaronic Priesthood and Melchizedek Priesthood had been restored to the earth, the Lord urged the Saints to build a temple to receive the keys by which this order of priesthood could be administered on the earth again, "for there [was] not a place found on earth that he may come to and restore again that which was lost … even the fulness of the priesthood." (D&C 124:28; italics added.)

Again the Prophet Joseph said: "If a man gets a fullness of the priesthood of God he has to get it in the same way that Jesus Christ obtained it, and that was by keeping all the commandments and obeying all the ordinances of the house of the Lord." (Teachings, p. 308.)

So the Kirtland Temple was completed at great sacrifice to the Saints.

Then, on 3 April 1836, the Lord Jesus Christ and three other heavenly beings appeared in this holy edifice. One of these heavenly messengers was Elijah, to whom the Lord said he had "committed the keys of the power of turning the hearts of the fathers to the children, and the hearts of the children to the fathers, that the whole earth may not be smitten with a curse." (D&C 27:9.)

Elijah brought the keys of sealing powers--that power which seals a man to a woman and seals their posterity to them endlessly, that which seals their forefathers to them all the way back to Adam. This is the power and order that Elijah revealed--that same order of priesthood which God gave to Adam and to all the ancient patriarchs which followed after him.

And this is why the Lord said to the Prophet Joseph Smith, "For verily I say unto you, the keys of the dispensation, which ye have received, have come down from the fathers, and last of all, being sent down from heaven unto you." (D&C 112:32.)

In a later revelation the Lord explained:

"In the celestial glory there are three heavens or degrees;

"And in order to obtain the highest, a man must enter into this order of the priesthood [meaning the new and everlasting covenant of marriage];

"And if he does not, he cannot obtain it.

"He may enter into the other, but that is the end of his kingdom; he cannot have an increase." (D&C 131:1-4; italics added.)

When our children obey the Lord and go to the temple to receive their blessings and enter into the marriage covenant, they enter into the same order of the priesthood that God instituted in the very beginning with father Adam.

This order entitles them to the same blessings of Abraham, of whom the Lord said that he "hath entered into his exaltation and sitteth upon his throne." (D&C 132:29.)

Then He significantly added: "This promise is yours also, because ye are of Abraham." (D&C 132:31.)

So again I emphasize: This order of priesthood can only be entered into when we comply with all the commandments of God and seek the blessings of the fathers as did Abraham by going to our Father's house. They are received in no other place on this earth!

I hope you would teach this truth about the temple to your children and your grandchildren. Go to the temple--our Father's house--to receive the blessings of your fathers that you may be entitled to the highest blessings of the priesthood. "For without this no man can see the face of God, even the Father, and live." (D&C 84:22.)

Our Father's house is a house of order. We go to His house to enter into that order of priesthood which will entitle us to all that the Father hath, if we are faithful. For as the Lord has revealed in modern times, Abraham's seed are "lawful heirs" to the priesthood. (See D&C 86:8-11.)

Now let me say something else to all who can worthily go to the House of the Lord. When you attend the temple and perform the ordinances that pertain to the House of the Lord, certain blessings will come to you:

•You will receive the spirit of Elijah, which will turn your hearts to your spouse, to your children, and to your forebears.

•You will love your family with a deeper love than you have loved before.

•Your hearts will be turned to your fathers and theirs to you.

•You will be endowed with power from on high as the Lord has promised.

•You will receive the key of the knowledge of God. (See D&C 84:19.) You will learn how you can be like Him. Even the power of godliness will be manifest to you. (See D&C 84:20.)

•You will be doing a great service to those who have passed to the other side of the veil in order that they might be "judged according to men in the flesh, but live according to God in the spirit." (D&C 138:34.)

Such are the blessings of the temple and the blessings of frequently attending the temple.

So I say at this centennial commemoration of the Logan Temple: God bless Israel! God bless those of our forebears who constructed this holy edifice. God bless us to teach our children and our grandchildren what great blessings await them by going to the temple. God bless us to receive all the blessings revealed by Elijah the prophet so that our callings and election will be made sure.

I testify with all my soul to the truth of this message and pray that the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob will bless modern Israel with the compelling desire to seek all the blessings of the fathers in the House of our Heavenly Father.

 

Elder Dallin H. Oaks – Taking Upon Us the Name of Jesus Christ April, 1985 CR

 

It is significant that when we partake of the sacrament we do not witness that we take upon us the name of Jesus Christ. We witness that we are willing to do so. (See D&C 20:77.) The fact that we only witness to our willingness suggests that something else must happen before we actually take that sacred name upon us in the most important sense.

What future event or events could this covenant contemplate? The scriptures suggest two sacred possibilities, one concerning the authority of God, especially as exercised in the temples, and the other--closely related--concerning exaltation in the celestial kingdom.

The name of God is sacred. The Lord's Prayer begins with the words, "Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed by thy name." (Matt. 6:9.) From Sinai came the commandment, "Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain." (Ex. 20:7, Deut. 5:11.) Latter-day revelation equates this with using the name of God without authority. "Let all men beware how they take my name in their lips," the Lord declares in a modern revelation, for "many there be who … use the name of the Lord, and use it in vain, having not authority." (D&C 63:61-62.)

Consistent with these references, many scriptures that refer to "the name of Jesus Christ" are obviously references to the authority of the Savior. This was surely the meaning conveyed when the seventy reported to Jesus that "even the devils are subject unto us through thy name." (Luke 10:17.) The Doctrine and Covenants employs this same meaning when it describes the Twelve Apostles of this dispensation as "they who shall desire to take upon them my name with full purpose of heart." (D&C 18:27.) The Twelve are later designated as "special witnesses of the name of Christ in all the world," and as those who "officiate in the name of the Lord, under the direction of the Presidency of the Church." (D&C 107:23, 33.)

By way of further illustration, the Old Testament contains scores of references to the name of the Lord in a context where it clearly means the authority of the Lord. Most of these references have to do with the temple.

When the children of Israel were still on the other side of the Jordan, the Lord told them that when they entered the promised land there should be a place where the Lord their God would "cause his name to dwell." (Deut. 12:11; see also Deut. 14:23-24; Deut. 16:6.) Time after time in succeeding revelations, the Lord and his servants referred to the future temple as a house for "the name" of the Lord God of Israel. (See 1 Kgs. 3:2; 1 Kgs. 5:5; 1 Kgs. 8:16-20, 29, 44, 48; 1 Chr. 22:8-10, 19; 1 Chr. 29:16; 2 Chr. 2:4; 2 Chr. 6:5-10, 20, 34, 38.) After the temple was dedicated, the Lord appeared to Solomon and told him that He had hallowed the temple "to put my name there for ever." (1 Kgs. 9:3; 2 Chr. 7:16.)

Similarly, in modern revelations the Lord refers to temples as houses built "unto my holy name." (D&C 124:39; D&C 105:33; D&C 109:2-5.) In the inspired dedicatory prayer of the Kirtland Temple, the Prophet Joseph Smith asked the Lord for a blessing upon "thy people upon whom thy name shall be put in this house." (D&C 109:26.)

All of these references to ancient and modern temples as houses for "the name" of the Lord obviously involve something far more significant than a mere inscription of his sacred name on the structure. The scriptures speak of the Lord's putting his name in a temple because he gives authority for his name to be used in the sacred ordinances of that house. That is the meaning of the Prophet's reference to the Lord's putting his name upon his people in that holy house. (See D&C 109:26.)

Willingness to take upon us the name of Jesus Christ can therefore be understood as willingness to take upon us the authority of Jesus Christ. According to this meaning, by partaking of the sacrament we witness our willingness to participate in the sacred ordinances of the temple and to receive the highest blessings available through the name and by the authority of the Savior when he chooses to confer them upon us.

Another future event we may anticipate when we witness our willingness to take that sacred name upon us concerns our relationship to our Savior and the incomprehensible blessings available to those who will be called by his name at the last day.

King Benjamin told his people, "There shall be no other name given nor any other way nor means whereby salvation can come unto the children of men, only in and through the name of Christ, the Lord Omnipotent." (Mosiah 3:17; see also 2 Ne. 31:21.) Peter proclaimed "the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth" to the leaders of the Jews, declaring that "there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved." (Acts 4:10, 12; see also D&C 18:21.)

The scriptures proclaim that the Savior's atoning sacrifice was for those who "believe on his name." Alma taught that Jesus Christ, the Son, the Only Begotten of the Father, would come "to take away the sins of the world, yea, the sins of every man who steadfastly believeth on his name." (Alma 5:48; Alma 9:27; Alma 11:40; Hel. 14:2.) In the words of King Benjamin, "Whosoever doeth this shall be found at the right hand of God, for he shall know the name by which he is called; for he shall be called by the name of Christ." (Mosiah 5:9.)

Thus, those who exercise faith in the sacred name of Jesus Christ and repent of their sins and enter into his covenant and keep his commandments (see Mosiah 5:8) can lay claim on the atoning sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Those who do so will be called by his name at the last day.

When the Savior taught the Nephites following his resurrection, he referred to the scriptural statement that "ye must take upon you the name of Christ." He explained, "For by this name shall ye be called at the last day; And whoso taketh upon him my name, and endureth to the end, the same shall be saved at the last day." (3 Ne. 27:5-6.) That same teaching is repeated in a modern revelation, which adds the caution that "if they know not the name by which they are called, they cannot have place in the kingdom of my Father." (D&C 18:25; see also Alma 5:38.)

The Book of Mormon explains the significance of being called by the name of Jesus Christ. When the Savior showed his spirit body to the brother of Jared, he introduced himself as the Father and the Son, declaring that through his redeeming sacrifice all mankind who believed on his name should have life eternal through him, "and they shall become my sons and my daughters." (Ether 3:14.) Abinadi said of those who believed in the Lord and looked to him for a remission of their sins "that these are his seed, or they are heirs of the kingdom of God." (Mosiah 15:11.) He continued this explanation as follows:

"For these are they whose sins he has borne; these are they for whom he has died, to redeem them from their transgressions. And now, are they not his seed?" (Mosiah 15:12.)

Speaking through the prophet Alma, the Lord explained the significance of this relationship: "For behold, in my name are they called; and if they know me they shall come forth, and shall have a place eternally at my right hand." (Mosiah 26:24.)

In these great scriptures from the Book of Mormon, we learn that those who are qualified by faith and repentance and compliance with the laws and ordinances of the gospel will have their sins borne by the Lord Jesus Christ. In spiritual and figurative terms they will become the sons and daughters of Christ, heirs to his kingdom. These are they who will be called by his name in the last day.

According to this meaning, when we witness our willingness to take upon us the name of Jesus Christ, we are signifying our commitment to do all that we can to achieve eternal life in the kingdom of our Father. We are expressing our candidacy--our determination to strive for--exaltation in the celestial kingdom.

Those who are found worthy to take upon them the name of Jesus Christ at the last day are described in the great revelations recorded in the ninety-third and seventy-sixth sections of the Doctrine and Covenants. Here the Savior revealed to Joseph Smith that in due time, if we keep the commandments of God, we can receive the "fulness" of the Father. (D&C 93:19-20.) Here the Savior bears record that "all those who are begotten through me are partakers of the glory of the [Father], and are the church of the Firstborn." (D&C 93:22.) "They are they into whose hands the Father has given all things. … Wherefore, as it is written, they are gods" who "shall dwell in the presence of God and his Christ forever and ever." (D&C 76:55, 58, 62.) "And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent." (John 17:3; see also D&C 88:4-5.) This is the ultimate significance of taking upon us the name of Jesus Christ.

When the priest offers the scriptural prayer on the bread at the sacrament table, he prays that all who partake may "witness" unto God, the Eternal Father, "that they are willing to take upon them the name of thy Son." (D&C 20:77; Moro. 4:3.) This witness has several different meanings.

It causes us to renew the covenant we made in the waters of baptism to take upon us the name of Jesus Christ and serve him to the end. We also take upon us his name as we publicly profess our belief in him, as we fulfill our obligations as members of his Church, and as we do the work of his kingdom.

But there is something beyond these familiar meanings, because what we witness is not that we take upon us his name but that we are willing to do so. In this sense, our witness relates to some future event or status whose attainment is not self-assumed, but depends on the authority or initiative of the Savior himself.

Scriptural references to the name of Jesus Christ often signify the authority of Jesus Christ. In that sense, our willingness to take upon us his name signifies our willingness to take upon us the authority of Jesus Christ in the sacred ordinances of the temple, and to receive the highest blessings available through his authority when he chooses to confer them upon us.

Finally, our willingness to take upon us the name of Jesus Christ affirms our commitment to do all that we can to be counted among those whom he will choose to stand at his right hand and be called by his name at the last day. In this sacred sense, our witness that we are willing to take upon us the name of Jesus Christ constitutes our declaration of candidacy for exaltation in the celestial kingdom. Exaltation is eternal life, "the greatest of all the gifts of God." (D&C 14:7.)

That is what we should ponder as we partake of the sacred emblems of the sacrament. As we do so, we glory in the mission of the risen Lord, who lived and taught and suffered and died and rose again that all mankind might have immortality and eternal life. Of this I testify in the sacred name of the Lord Jesus Christ, whose witness I am, amen.

Accept the ordinances and covenants of the gospel and live up to them, as did the people of King Benjamin.

 

 

(Mosiah 5:5-9.)

 

5 And we are willing to enter into a covenant with our God to do his will, and to be obedient to his commandments in all things that he shall command us, all the remainder of our days, that we may not bring upon ourselves a never-ending torment, as has been spoken by the angel, that we may not drink out of the cup of the wrath of God.

 

6 And now, these are the words which king Benjamin desired of them; and therefore he said unto them: Ye have spoken the words that I desired; and the covenant which ye have made is a righteous covenant.

 

7 And now, because of the covenant which ye have made ye shall be called the children of Christ, his sons, and his daughters; for behold, this day he hath spiritually begotten you; for ye say that your hearts are changed through faith on his name; therefore, ye are born of him and have become his sons and his daughters.

 

8 And under this head ye are made free, and there is no other head whereby ye can be made free. There is no other name given whereby salvation cometh; therefore, I would that ye should take upon you the name of Christ, all you that have entered into the covenant with God that ye should be obedient unto the end of your lives.

 

9 And it shall come to pass that whosoever doeth this shall be found at the right hand of God, for he shall know the name by which he is called; for he shall be called by the name of Christ.

 

Adam-Ondi-Ahman is where the ordinances began, Adam brought the people to this point, it is a very sacred and important place, and its role has yet to be completed!!

 

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 107:53.)

 

53 Three years previous to the death of Adam, he called Seth, Enos, Cainan, Mahalaleel, Jared, Enoch, and Methuselah, who were all high priests, with the residue of his posterity who were righteous, into the valley of Adam-ondi-Ahman, and there bestowed upon them his last blessing.

 

The whole purpose is to bring the righteous (sons and daughter of God) into the presence of God.

President Benson’s talk in these notes discussed the events of Adam-Ondi-Ahman.

 

 

(Moses 5:10-11.)

 

10 And in that day Adam blessed God and was filled, and began to prophesy concerning all the families of the earth, saying: Blessed be the name of God, for because of my transgression my eyes are opened, and in this life I shall have joy, and again in the flesh I shall see God.

 

11 And Eve, his wife, heard all these things and was glad, saying: Were it not for our transgression we never should have had seed, and never should have known good and evil, and the joy of our redemption, and the eternal life which God giveth unto all the obedient.

 

The Law of Adoption as stated by Wilford Woodruff in a Conference address on April 8, 1894.

 

Men are in danger sometimes in being adopted to others, until they know who they are and what they will be. Now, what are the feelings of Israel? They have felt that they wanted to be adopted to somebody. President Young was not satisfied in his mind with regard to the extent of this matter; President Taylor was not. When I went before the Lord to know who I should be adopted to (we were then being adopted to prophets and apostles), the Spirit of God said to me, "Have you not a father, who begot you?" "Yes, I have." "Then why not honor him? Why not be adopted to him?" "Yes," says I, "that is right." I was adopted to my father, and should have had my father sealed to his father, and so on back; and the duty that I want every man who presides over a temple to see performed from this day henceforth and forever, unless the Lord Almighty commands otherwise, is, let every man be adopted to his father. When a man receives the endowments, adopt him to his father; not to Wilford Woodruff, nor to any other man outside the lineage of his fathers. That is the will of God to this people. I want ll men who preside over these temples in these mountains of Israel to bear this in mind. What business have I to take away the rights of the lineage of any man? What right has any man to do this? No; I say let every man be adopted to his father; and then you will do exactly what God said when he declared He would send Elijah the prophet in the last days. Elijah the prophet appeared unto Joseph Smith and told him that the day had come when this principle must be carried out.

(Brian H. Stuy, ed., Collected Discourses, 5 vols. [Burbank, Calif., and Woodland Hills, Ut.: B.H.S. Publishing, 1987-1992],

4 :.)

 

 

The Doctrine of
Adoption into the Family of God

 

Power to Become the Sons of God

The following scriptures show the necessity of becoming sons of God:
 

  • But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name. (John 1:12)
  • And as many as have received me, to them have I given to become the sons of God; and even so will I to as many as shall believe on my name, for behold, by me redemption cometh, and in me is the law of Moses fulfilled. (3 Nephi 9:17)
  • And after that he came men also were saved by faith in his name; and by faith, they become the sons of God. . . .  Wherefore, my beloved brethren, pray unto the Father with all the energy of heart, that ye may be filled with this love, which he hath bestowed upon all who are true followers of his Son, Jesus Christ; that ye may become the sons of God; that when he shall appear we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is; that we may have this hope; that we may be purified even as he is pure. (Moroni 7:26,48)
  • But verily, verily, I say unto you, that as many as receive me, to them will I give power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on my name. (D&C 11:30)
  • Who so loved the world that he gave his own life, that as many as would believe might become the sons of God. Wherefore you are my son; (D&C 34:3)
  • I am Jesus Christ, the Son of God, who was crucified for the sins of the world, even as many as will believe on my name, that they may become the sons of God, even one in me as I am one in the Father, as the Father is one in me, that we may be one. (D&C 35:2)
  • I came unto mine own, and mine own received me not; but unto as many as received me gave I power to do many miracles, and to become the sons of God; and even unto them that believed on my name gave I power to obtain eternal life. (D&C 45:8)
  • AND it came to pass that Enoch continued his speech, saying: Behold, our father Adam taught these things, and many have believed and become the sons of God, and many have believed not, and have perished in their sins, and are looking forth with fear, in torment, for the fiery indignation of the wrath of God to be poured out upon them. (Moses 7:1)
     

Adam Became a Son of God

Moses 6:64-68

And it came to pass, when the Lord had spoken with Adam, our father, that Adam cried unto the Lord, and he was caught away by the Spirit of the Lord, and was carried down into the water, and was laid under the water, and was brought forth out of the water.

And thus he was baptized, and the Spirit of God descended upon him, and thus he was born of the Spirit, and became quickened in the inner man.

And he heard a voice out of heaven, saying: Thou art baptized with fire, and with the Holy Ghost. This is the record of the Father, and the Son, from henceforth and forever;

And thou art after the order of him who was without beginning of days or end of years, from all eternity to all eternity.

Behold, thou art one in me, a son of Godand thus may all become my sons.
 
 

Adoption Comes Through Ordinances

Ezra Taft Benson

When our Heavenly Father placed Adam and Eve on this earth, He did so with the purpose in mind of teaching them how to regain His presence. Our Father promised a Savior to redeem them from their fallen condition. He gave to them the plan of salvation and told them to teach their children faith in Jesus Christ, and repentance. Further, Adam and his posterity were commanded by God to be baptized, to receive the Holy Ghost, and to enter into the order of the Son of God. To enter into the order of the Son of God is the equivalent today of entering into the fulness of the Melchizedek Priesthood, which is only received in the house of the Lord. ("What I Hope You Will Teach Your Children About the Temple," Temples of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, pp. 42-43; also, Ensign, Aug. 1985, p. 8; emphasis added.)
 
 

Adopted into the Family of God Necessary to Become As God

John Taylor

A man, as a man, could arrive at all the dignity that a man was capable of obtaining or receiving; but it needed a God to raise him to the dignity of a God. For this cause it is written, "Now are we the sons of God; and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that when he shall appear we shall be like him." And how and why like Him? Because, through the instrumentality of the atonement and the adoption, it is made possible for us to become of the family of God, and joint heirs with Jesus Christ; and that as He, the potential instrument, through the oneness that existed between Him and His Father, by reason of obedience to divine law, overcame death, hell and the grave, and sat down upon His Father's throne, so shall we be able to sit down with Him, even upon His throne. (Mediation and Atonement, pp. 145-146)
 

Bruce R. McConkie

As the literal Son of God -- the Firstborn in the spirit, the Only Begotten in the flesh -- Christ is the natural heir of his Father. It thus became his right to inherit, receive, and possess all that his Father had. (John 16:15.) And his Father is possessor of all things: the universe; all power, wisdom, and goodness; the fulness of truth and knowledge; and an infinity of all good attributes. By heirship and by obedience, going from grace to grace, the Son attained these same things. (D. & C. 93:5-17.)

By obedience to the fulness of gospel law, righteous men are adopted into the family of God so that they also become heirs, Joint-heirs with Christ (Rom. 8:14-18; Gal. 3:26-29; 4:1-7), inheritors of all that the Father hath. (D. & C. 134:33-41.) In his famous King Follett Sermon, speaking of those who "shall be heirs of God and joint-heirs with Jesus Christ," the Prophet asked what their glory should be. Answering his own query, he described joint-heirship as inheriting "the same power, the same glory and the same exaltation, until you arrive at the station of a God, and ascend the throne of eternal power, the same as those who have gone before." (Teachings, p. 347.)

A joint-heir is one who inherits equally with all other heirs including the Chief Heir who is the Son. Each joint-heir has an equal and an undivided portion of the whole of everything. If one knows all things, so do all others. If one has all power, so do all those who inherit jointly with him. If the universe belongs to one, so it does equally to the total of all upon whom the joint inheritances are bestowed.

Joint-heirs are possessors of all things. (D. & C. 50:26-28.) All things are theirs for they have exaltation. (D. & C. 76:50-60.) They are made "equal" with their Lord. (D. & C. 88:107.) They gain all power both in heaven and on earth and receive the fulness of the Father, and all knowledge and truth are theirs. (D. & C. 93:15-30.) They are gods. (D. & C. 132:20.) Celestial marriage is the gate to this high state of exaltation. (Doctrines of Salvation, vol. 2, pp. 24, 35-39; D. & C. 131:1-4; 132.) [Mormon Doctrine, pp. 394-395]

 

Power of Elijah-Link the Family of God Together

 

Brigham Young

I will here refer to a principle that has not been named by me for years. With the introduction of the Priesthood upon the earth was also introduced the sealing ordinance, that the chain of the Priesthood from Adam to the latest generation might be united in one unbroken continuance. It is the same power and the same keys that Elijah held, and was to exercise in the last days. "Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the Lord: and he shall turn the hearts of the fathers to the children, and the hearts of the children to their fathers, lest I come and smite the earth with a curse." By this power men will be sealed to men back to Adam, completing and making perfect the chain of the Priesthood from his day to the winding up scene. . . . I have had visions and revelations instructing me how to organize this people so that they can live like the family of heaven, but I cannot do it while so much selfishness and wickedness reign in the Elders of Israel. (Journal of Discourses, 9:269)
 
 

There is Only One Family of God

 

Joseph Fielding Smith

  • Eventually, when this work is perfected, and Christ delivers up to his Father the keys and makes his report, and death is destroyed, then that great family from the days of Adam down, of all the righteous, those who have kept the commandments of God, will find that they are one family, the family of God, entitled to all the blessings that pertain to the exaltation." (Doctrines of Salvation, 2:68)
  • When everything gets finished, we will all be one family--every member of the Church a member of one family, the family of God. And we will all be subject to our first progenitor, Adam, Michael, the archangel, who has been appointed and given authority under Jesus Christ to stand at the head and preside over all his posterity. We are one family. (Doctrines of Salvation, 2:173-174)
     

Brigham Young

  • We now want to organize the Latter-day Saints, every man, woman and child among them, who has a desire to be organized, into this holy order. You may call it the Order of Enoch, you may call it co-partnership, or just what you please. It is the United Order of the Kingdom of God on the earth; but we say the Order of Enoch on the same principle you find in the revelation concerning the Priesthood, which, to avoid the too frequent repetition of the name of the Deity, is called the Priesthood after the order of Melchizedek. This order is the order of heaven, the family of heaven on the earth; it is the children of our Father here upon the earth organized into one body or one family, to operate together. (Journal of Discourses, 17:44)
  • It is lamentable to any person who understands by the visions of eternity the plan of salvation, the providences of God to His creatures, to see one who has his mind opened to see, understand, and embrace the principles of life and salvation in his faith, and who has the privilege of being adopted into the family of heaven, of becoming an heir with the Saints that have formerly lived upon the earth, an heir with the Prophets and with Jesus Christ, and of being numbered with the children of the Most High, with a legal administrator to officiate for the attainment of all these privileges, and to open the door of salvation and admittance into the kingdom, neglect so great a salvation. (Journal of Discourses, 4:58-59)
     

We Cannot Be Saved Without Our Kindred Dead

Joseph F. Smith

The same principles that apply to the living apply also to the dead. … And so we are baptized for those that are dead. The living cannot be made perfect without the dead, nor the dead be made perfect without the living. There has got to be a welding together and a joining together of parents and children and children and parents until the whole chain of God's family shall be welded together into one chain, and they shall all become the family of God and His Christ. (Teachings of Presidents of the Church: Joseph F. Smtih, p. 411).
 

Wilford Woodruff

When I went before the Lord to know who I should be adopted to (we were then being adopted to prophets and apostles), the Spirit of God said to me, "Have you not a father, who begot you?" "Yes, I have." "Then why not honor him? Why not be adopted to him?" "Yes," says I, "that is right." I was adopted to my father, and should have had my father sealed to his father, and so on back; and the duty that I want every man who presides over a temple to see performed from this day henceforth and forever, unless the Lord Almighty commands otherwise, is, let every man be adopted to his father. When a man receives the endowments, adopt him to his father; not to Wilford Woodruff, nor to any other man outside the lineage of his fathers. That is the will of God to this people. I want all men who preside over these temples in these mountains of Israel to bear this in mind. What business have I to take away the rights of the lineage of any man? What right has any man to do this?. No; I say let every man be adopted to his father; and then you will do exactly what God said when he declared he would send Elijah the prophet in the last days. Elijah the prophet appeared unto Joseph Smith and told him that the day had come when this principle must be carried out. Joseph Smith did not live long enough to enter any further upon these things. His soul was wound up with this work before he was martyred for the word of God and testimony of Jesus Christ. He told us that there must be a welding link of all dispensations and of the work of God from one generation to another. This was upon his mind more than most any other subject that was given to him. (The Discourses of Wilford Woodruff, p.155)
 

Joseph Fielding Smith

MEMBERSHIP IN FAMILY OF GOD. When everything gets finished, we will all be one family -- every member of the Church a member of one family, the family of God. And we will all be subject to our first progenitor, Adam, Michael, the archangel, who has been appointed and given authority under Jesus Christ to stand at the head and preside over all his posterity. We are one family. And we all have to be joined to that family. So it is not merely enough that we be baptized for our dead or for ourselves, but also we have to be sealed to our parents. We must have the parents sealed to their parents and so on, as far back as we can go, and eventually back to Adam.

There will be cases where some of our ancestors will not be worthy and will drop out, but the links will have to be joined without them. So when the Prophet says we cannot be saved or exalted without our dead, he had this in mind. Suppose we do not do any work for our ancestors? Then where are we? We are out on a limb. We leave ourselves on the side lines. We are not joined into this great family. We may be born under the covenant and thus belong to our parents, but where there are breaks in that lineage we are not united.

SEALINGS ESSENTIAL TO MEMBERSHIP IN GOD'S FAMILY. And, therefore, when the Prophet says we cannot be exalted without them, he is thinking of the family connections -- generation to generation. And if we are going to sit down and do nothing and let our ancestors whose history we can obtain go without having their work done, we are just setting ourselves off on the side. We are not members; we do not have the credentials which permit us into that family. You see how important it is that we labor for our dead?

Why do we go into the temples to be sealed, husbands and wives, and children to parents, and why are we commanded to have this work done, not only for ourselves, but also to be sealed to our fathers and mothers, and their fathers and mothers before them, back as far as we can go? Because we want to belong to that great family of God which is in heaven, and, so far as the Church is concerned, on earth. That is why.

NO PERFECTION WITHOUT OUR DEAD. Now, some members of the Church have wondered just what was meant by the words of the Prophet, that we without our dead could not be made perfect. Will not a man who keeps the commandments of the Lord, who is faithful and true so far as he himself is concerned, receive perfection? Yes, provided his worthy dead also receive the same privileges, because there must be a family organization, a family unit, and each generation must be linked to the chain that goes before in order to bring perfection in family organization. Thus eventually we will be one large family with Adam at the head, Michael, the archangel, presiding over his posterity. . . .

PERFECTION COMES THROUGH CELESTIAL FAMILY ORGANIZATION. We are taught in the gospel of Jesus Christ that the family organization will be, so far as celestial exaltation is concerned, one that is complete -- an organization linked from father and mother and children of one generation, to the father and mother and children of the next generation, thus expanding and spreading out down to the end of time. If we fail to do the work, therefore, in the temples for our dead, you see our links in this chain -- genealogical chain -- will be broken; we will have to stand aside at least until that is remedied.

We could not be made perfect in this organization unless we are brought in by this selective or sealing power, and if we have failed to do the work for those of our line, who have gone before, we will stand aside until somebody comes along who will do it for us. And if we have had the opportunity and have failed to do it, then naturally we would be under condemnation, and I think all through eternity we would regret the fact that we had failed to do the thing that was placed before us to do and which was our duty to accomplish in the salvation of the children of men.

NO SALVATION WITHOUT OUR WORTHY DEAD. The expression about not being saved without our dead is greatly misunderstood. We will all be saved without some of our dead, without any question. The Lord cannot save the wilfully wicked, and they will not be saved, nor will those be who refused to accept the work. This expression means that we cannot be saved without our dead who prove themselves worthy of salvation. The Lord will not save all of his family. One third of them rebelled in pre-existence. We are doing the genealogical work for those who died before the gospel was restored and who did not have the chance, not for those who had all the chance in the world and would not receive it. (Doctrines of Salvation, 2:173-176)

 

Sealing of Children

James E. Talmage

Children born to parents thus married under the celestial law are heirs to the Priesthood; 'children of the covenant' they are called; no ordinance of adoption or sealing is required to give them place in the blessed posterity of promise. (The House of the Lord, p.88.)
 

George Q. Cannon

It is not necessary, where parents are thus sealed together by the authority of the Holy Priesthood for time and for eternity that their children should be adopted or be sealed to them. They are legitimate heirs of the Priesthood and of the blessings of the new and everlasting covenant. But not so with those who have been born outside of this covenant. There has to be some ordinance performed in order to make them legitimate; and that ordinance, the Prophet Joseph revealed, was the ordinance of adoption; that is, that which covers the ordinance or law, although we do not use the word adoption when we seal children to parents; we call that sealing. (Collected Discourses, Vol.4)

 

11:30 Hyrum's position was much like that of the meridian twelve of whom the Savior said that they would "receive power" after that the Holy Ghost had come upon them (Acts 1:8). He is promised that he will be given power to become a son of God. That is, he will be spiritually adopted by covenant into the family of God, thus he becomes an heir of God and joint- heir with Christ (Romans 8:17), having rightful claim upon all that the Father has (D&C 76:95; 84:38; 93:19).                         

 

Revelations of the Restoration, Joseph Fielding McConkie

 

 

From Adam to Joseph Smith:

The Initiation and Restoration of Temple Ordinances

 

Bruce Satterfield

BYUI – Religious Lecture Series

January 28, 2006

 

 

 

The Garden of Eden is a type for the Celestial Room (God’s Presence).  Adam and Eve were praying to learn how to get back to the Father’s presence.

 

(Moses 5:4.)

 

4 And Adam and Eve, his wife, called upon the name of the Lord, and they heard the voice of the Lord from the way toward the Garden of Eden, speaking unto them, and they saw him not; for they were shut out from his presence.

 

In Moses 5:5, the Lord gave Adam and Eve two commandments, verses 6-8 show how they were obedient in keeping these commandments.

 

(Moses 5:5-8.)

 

5 And he gave unto them commandments, that they should worship the Lord their God, and should offer the firstlings of their flocks, for an offering unto the Lord. And Adam was obedient unto the commandments of the Lord.

 

6 And after many days an angel of the Lord appeared unto Adam, saying: Why dost thou offer sacrifices unto the Lord? And Adam said unto him: I know not, save the Lord commanded me.

 

7 And then the angel spake, saying: This thing is a similitude of the sacrifice of the Only Begotten of the Father, which is full of grace and truth.

 

8 Wherefore, thou shalt do all that thou doest in the name of the Son, and thou shalt repent and call upon God in the name of the Son forevermore.

 

 In the first chapter of the book Leviticus, we learn the exact way an animal was prepared for sacrifice on the altar.

 

(Leviticus 1:1-9.)

 

1 And the LORD called unto Moses, and spake unto him out of the tabernacle of the congregation, saying,

 

2 Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them, If any man of you bring an offering unto the LORD, ye shall bring your offering of the cattle, even of the herd, and of the flock.

 

3 If his offering be a burnt sacrifice of the herd, let him offer a male without blemish: he shall offer it of his own voluntary will at the door of the tabernacle of the congregation before the LORD.

 

4 And he shall put his hand upon the head of the burnt offering; and it shall be accepted for him to make atonement for him.

 

5 And he shall kill the bullock before the LORD: and the priests, Aaron's sons, shall bring the blood, and sprinkle the blood round about upon the altar that is by the door of the tabernacle of the congregation.

 

6 And he shall flay the burnt offering, and cut it into his pieces.

 

7 And the sons of Aaron the priest shall put fire upon the altar, and lay the wood in order upon the fire:

 

8 And the priests, Aaron's sons, shall lay the parts, the head, and the fat, in order upon the wood that is on the fire which is upon the altar:

 

9 But his inwards and his legs shall he wash in water: and the priest shall burn all on the altar, to be a burnt sacrifice, an offering made by fire, of a sweet savour unto the LORD.

 

 

The fire consuming the dismembered parts of the animal’s body is a type of the sacrifice that we are required to make personally before the Lord.  Our baptism by fire consists of giving our heart, might, mind and strength to the Lord.

 

                                                Inwards >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Heart

 

                                                Legs >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Might

 

                                                Head >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mind

 

                                                Fat >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Strength

 

By offering this sacrifice, Adam and Eve were showing their faith in Christ and repentance for their sins.

 

 

The Law of Worship and the Law of Sacrifice

Bruce Satterfield
Department of Religious Education
Brigham Young University - Idaho

[Found in New Perspectives, Fall Semester Vol. 14, No. 2, November 1997, pp. 14-16.]

In holy temples, we enter into covenants with God that are essential for our progress towards exaltation. One such covenant centers on the law of sacrifice.(1) It is important to understand the intent of the law of sacrifice in order to honor the covenant associated with it. A study of the scriptures will greatly aid our coming to understand the spirit of the law of sacrifice while at the same time increasing our motivation and determination to live the law.

According to the scriptural account, after Adam and Eve were cast out of the garden of Eden, they "called upon the name of the Lord." What they prayed for is not stated. But it must be certain that at least one of the things they wanted to know was how to do to regain God's presence for as the account reads, "they were shut out from his presence" (Moses 5:4). In response to their prayers, the Lord said "that they should worship the Lord their God, and should offer the firstlings of their flocks, for an offering unto the Lord" (Moses 5:5).

The law of worship has been given to man in every age. In our dispensation, the Lord told the Church, "all men must repent and believe on the name of Jesus Christ, and worship the Father in his name. . . . or they cannot be saved in the Kingdom of God" (D&C 20:29). Dallin H. Oaks described true worship in these terms: "Worship often includes actions, but true worship always involves a particular attitude of mind. The attitude of worship evokes the deepest feelings of allegiance, adoration, and awe. Worship combines love and reverence in a state of devotion that draws our spirits closer to God."(2) The attitude of true worship of God means to emulate God by placing him at the very center of our lives. When God is placed at the center of our lives then his work and glory, which is to "bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of man" (Moses 1:39), becomes our work and glory. In this condition all our actions are ultimately aimed at bringing to pass the immortality and eternal life of God's children.

The law of worship and the law of sacrifice are inherently connected. The ritual associated with the law of sacrifice is a visual representation of the law of worship. We are not told specifically how Adam performed the ritual of the law of sacrifice. We do know, however, that the law of sacrifice was passed on to Adam's posterity. It continued to the time of Moses and was incorporated in the law of Moses. In Leviticus chapter one, a detailed description of the ritual associated with the law of sacrifice is given. This description is very revealing. Since the "law of sacrifice is required of all disciples,"(3) the description of the sacrificial procedure will help in understanding what is meant by the law of sacrifice and the law of worship.

According to Leviticus 1, the offering was first killed (vs. 5). After it was killed, the animal was flayed, or skinned (vs. 6). The skin was not to be burnt for that would produce an offensive smell; the sacrifice was to be a "sweet savour unto the Lord" (vs. 9), meaning that this sacrifice was acceptable to God. The animal was then cut into pieces and laid in a specified order on the altar (vss. 6-9). First, the head was removed and placed on the altar. Second, the fat was cut off and laid next to the head. Then the inwards were taken out and laid next to the fat. After that, the legs were cut off the carcass and laid next to the inwards. Finally, the carcass was placed on the altar. After all this was done, the entire animal was consumed in flames. It seems that the sacrificial offerings performed at the time of Adam were similar to the procedure described in Leviticus 1 for we are told that Abel "brought of the firstlings of his flock, and the fat thereof" (Genesis 4:4;Moses 5:20; emphasis added).

The Hebrew name of the burnt offering is olah ("that which goes up"), meaning the offering that goes up or is given up to God. The translation of olah in the King James Version is the "burnt offering" because the entire animal was consumed in the flames of the fire, and, unlike other sacrifices, no part was eaten by the offerer or priest. The symbolism of this is clear: the burnt offering was a consecration offering. In other words, the entire offering was consecrated to God. It can be seen from this that the law of sacrifice is not only inherently connected with the law of worship but also with another covenant made in the temple, the law of consecration. Of this, Elder Bruce R. McConkie taught: "Sacrifice and consecration are inseparably intertwined"(4)

But what was being sacrificed or consecrated to God? The answer was given to Adam and Eve. After "many days" of performing the ritual associated with the law of sacrifice, "an angel of the Lord appeared unto Adam, saying: Why dost thou offer sacrifices unto the Lord?" Adam responded by saying, "I know not, save the Lord commanded me." Then the angel explained the meaning of the sacrifice in these words: "This thing is a similitude of the sacrifice of the Only Begotten of the Father" (Moses 5:6-7). That is, the lamb symbolized the sacrifice of Jesus Christ in behalf of Adam and Eve and their posterity.

The cutting of the lamb into pieces and placing the pieces on the altar to be entirely consumed by the flames was a representation of the worship, sacrifice, and consecration of Jesus Christ to God's work and glory. His worship and sacrifice was evidenced by his consecrating all he had to the building of the Kingdom of God. Each piece of the sacrificial lamb symbolized specific aspects of Christ's consecration to the salvation of man through the atonement. The severed head symbolized that the Savior would devote all his thoughts, intellect, and study to the salvation of man. Likewise, the fat represented that all the Savior's energy would be consecrated to the atoning work. The inwards, typifying the Savior's emotions, best exemplified by his love, mercy, and compassion, would be aimed at saving mankind from a world of darkness and doom while leading them into the path that leads to exaltation. The legs symbolized that the direction and course of the Savior's life would be dedicated to one end alone: to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of God's children. In other words, the sacrifice, flaying, and burning of the sacrificial lamb symbolized that Christ would sacrifice and devote all his heart, might, mind, and strength to God's work and glory. This is the ultimate form of worship!

Just as Jesus Christ would sacrifice and consecrate all he had to God's work and glory so must Adam and Eve (and their posterity) sacrifice all they have for the same purpose.(5) Therefore, the angel told Adam and Eve that from that day forward, everything they did was to be done "in the name of the Son" (Moses 5:7-8). Paul stated it this way: "present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service" (Romans 12:1). It is in this way that many in the past "who had been faithful in the testimony of Jesus while they lived in mortality" had "offered sacrifice in the similitude of the great sacrifice of the Son of God" (D&C 138:12-13).

The scriptures also reveal many other insights relative to the law of sacrifice that are helpful. For instance, as already noted, the ritual associated with the law of sacrifice became an important part of the law of Moses. In fact, the burnt offering was to be offered "day by day" in both the morning and the evening (Numbers 28:3-4). This was to continually remind Israel that not only were they dependent upon the future sacrifice of the Messiah for their salvation but that all their activities, every day, all day, should be devoted to God.

The Old Testament is clear that performing the ritual of sacrifice was not as important as the intent of the rite. When Saul was commanded by the prophet Samuel to lead the Israelites in battle against their age old enemy, the Amalekites, he was told to "utterly destroy all that they [the Amalekites] have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass" (1 Samuel 15:3). However, Saul was disobedient to the command of the Lord through Samuel. After defeating the Amalekites, and killing all the people, he spared "the best of the sheep, and of the oxen, and of the fatlings, and the lambs" that he might offer "sacrifice unto the Lord" (1 Samuel 15:9-21). Saul's disobedience violated the very intent of the law of sacrifice. Therefore, Samuel rebuked Saul saying, "Hath the LORD as great delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices, as in obeying the voice of the LORD? Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken than the fat of rams" (1 Samuel 15:22). Likewise, a later prophet chided Israel for ritualistic living of the law of sacrifice without considering its intent: "For I desired mercy, and not sacrifice; and the knowledge of God more than burnt offerings" (Hosea 6:6).

The relationship between the intent of the law of sacrifice and the ritual is well illustrated in the story of Lehi. When Lehi was commanded to leave Jerusalem "and depart into the wilderness," we are told that he "he left his house, and the land of his inheritance, and his gold, and his silver, and his precious things, and took nothing with him, save it were his family, and provisions, and tents, and departed into the wilderness" (1 Nephi 2:4). Some days later, when he and his family stopped their journey and pitched their tents near a river, Lehi "built an altar of stones, and made an offering unto the Lord, and gave thanks unto the Lord our God" (1 Nephi 2:7). The relationship is clear. After sacrificing all his worldly possessions, Lehi offered a sacrifice to demonstrate his willingness to worship God with all his heart, might, mind, and strength by placing him at the center of his life and actions.

Note the similarity in the life of Abraham. After the Lord had told him to "Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father's house, unto a land that I will shew thee," Abraham obediently left his land and people and came into the land of Canaan, the promised land. Upon his arrival, he built an altar and offered sacrifice (Gen. 12:7).

In fact, the whole life of Abraham is a paradigm of how the law of sacrifice should be lived. At various times, he was asked to give up mortal things for higher ideals. In all cases, Abraham was obedient to the law of sacrifice (see Genesis 12-22) and therefore, he achieved his exaltation (see D&C 132:29-37). Abraham epitomizes what Joseph Smith said about the law of sacrifice. He explained that the law of sacrifice requires a "man to lay down his all, his character and reputation, his honor, and applause, his good name among men, his houses, his lands, his brothers and sisters, his wife and children, and even his own life -- counting all things but filth and dross for the excellency of the knowledge of Jesus Christ."(6)

The example of Abraham and Lehi is found in other places in the scriptures. For instance, the law of sacrifice permeates the entire gospel of Matthew. Note the following examples. Upon seeing the star that signaled the birth of the Messiah, the wise men demonstrated their willingness to make a sacrifice for a higher cause by leaving their homeland and making an extended journey to find the Christ child and pay homage to him. The giving of their treasure, which included the expensive gifts of "gold, and frankincense, and myrrh," was a further demonstration of their willingness to sacrifice what they had to the child who would bring salvation to all men (see Matt. 2:1-12). In stark contrast, Herod, the king of the Savior's own people, was not willing to sacrifice anything to worship the Savior but instead attempted to assassinate his would be rival (Matt. 2:1-18). Matthew also records the sacrifice made by some of the Savior's disciples. When Peter, Andrew, James, and John were asked to follow the Savior, "they straightway left their nets [occupation], and followed him." Interestingly enough, the account reveals that James and John not only left their nets, but their father also (Matt. 4:18-22). Speaking of this kind of sacrifice, Matthew records the Savior saying, "He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me" (Matthew 10:37). Again, on another occasion, the Savior said: "And every one that hath forsaken houses, or brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, or wife, or children, or lands, for my name's sake, shall receive an hundredfold, and shall inherit everlasting life" (Matt. 19:29). Matthew also records that the ultimate sacrifice made by any man was made by the Savior himself when he retired to Gethsemane to begin the atoning sacrifice. That this was truly a sacrifice is revealed in the Savior's own words, "O my Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me: nevertheless not as I will, but as thou wilt" (Matt. 26:39). Submitting our will to the will of the Father is the essence of the law of sacrifice.

The scriptures inform us that with the sacrifice of Jesus Christ the ritual associated with the law of sacrifice, the killing of an animal was done away with. After the great destruction had come upon the land associated with the death of Christ, the Lord said to the people: "ye shall offer up unto me no more the shedding of blood; yea, your sacrifices and your burnt offerings shall be done away, for I will accept none of your sacrifices and your burnt offerings." Instead of offering blood sacrifices, the Lord required a new sacrifice: "And ye shall offer for a sacrifice unto me a broken heart and a contrite spirit" (3 Nephi 9:19-20). In the Doctrine and Covenants, the latter-day Church was given the same commandment: "Thou shalt offer a sacrifice unto the Lord thy God in righteousness, even that of a broken heart and a contrite spirit" (D&C 59:8).

For one to offer a sacrifice of a broken heart and a contrite spirit, he must recognize his spiritual poorness, mourn his sins, and come unto Christ for forgiveness. When that happens, the sacrifice of Christ will come into his heart and comfort him through the miracle of forgiveness (see 3 Nephi 12:3-4). Elder Neal A. Maxwell spoke of this in these terms:

"So it is that real, personal sacrifice never was placing an animal on the altar. Instead, it is a willingness to put the animal in us upon the altar and letting it be consumed! Such is the "sacrifice unto the Lord . . . of a broken heart and a contrite spirit," (D&C 59:8), a prerequisite to taking up the cross, while giving "away all [our] sins" in order to know God (Alma 22:18); for the denial of self precedes the full acceptance of Him."(7)

But this is only the beginning of honoring the intent of the law of sacrifice. President Spencer W. Kimball taught :

“. . . we must lay on the altar and sacrifice whatever is required by the Lord. We begin by offering a "broken heart and a contrite spirit." We follow this by giving our best effort in our assigned fields of labor and callings. We learn our duty and execute it fully. Finally we consecrate our time, talents and means as called upon by our file leaders and as prompted by the whisperings of the Spirit. In the Church, as in the Welfare system also, we can give expression to every ability, every righteous desire, every thoughtful impulse. Whether a volunteer, father, home teacher, bishop, or neighbor, whether a visiting teacher, mother, homemaker, or friend--there is ample opportunity to give our all."(8)

In conclusion, the law of worship and the law of sacrifice are interrelated laws that are designed to put God at the center of our lives. Those who enter into these laws by covenant, place all they have on the altar. Their minds, energy, heart, and course of life will be devoted to God's work and glory which is to bring to pass "the immortality and eternal life of man." In other words, they will "love and serve God with all their mights, minds, and strength" (D&C 20:31). In so doing, they will lose their life in the service of others. By losing their life in the building of the kingdom of God, they shall find it saved in the celestial kingdom (see Matt. 10:39). President Harold B. Lee taught:

"If in this day the Church rises to the call of the First Presidency, and if Church members sacrifice of their means, their time, their talents for the upbuilding of the kingdom of God, not withholding their own lives, if that were necessary, then there will come to this people, and to that individual who thus is willing to consecrate himself, the greatest joy that can come to the human soul."(9)
 

References

1. President Harold B. Lee taught, "We have in sacred places what we call the law of sacrifice" (The Teachings of Harold B. Lee, Ed. Clyde J. Williams, [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1996] p.318). Likewise, President Ezra Taft Benson stated, "In the course of our visits to the temple, we are given insights into the meaning of the eternal journey of man. We see beautiful and impressive symbolisms of the most important events -- past, present, and future -- symbolizing man's mission in relationship to God. We are reminded of our obligations as we make solemn covenants pertaining to obedience, consecration, sacrifice, and dedicated service to our Heavenly Father" (Ezra Taft Benson, Teachings of Ezra Taft Benson, [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1988] p. 251).

2. Dallin H. Oaks, Pure in Heart, Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1988. p.125.

3. Bruce R. McConkie, The Mortal Messiah. The Messiah Series, vols. 2-5. Salt Lake City: Deseret, 1979-1982. 3:240.

4. Conference Report, Apr. 1975, p. 74; or Ensign, May 1975, p. 50.

5. Elder McConkie taught,

"The law of consecration is that we consecrate our time, our talents, and our money and property to the cause of the Church: such are to be available to the extent they are needed to further the Lord's interests on earth.

"The law of sacrifice is that we are willing to sacrifice all that we have for the truth's sake--our character and reputation; our honor and applause; our good name among men; our houses, lands, and families: all things, even our very lives if need be" (Conference Report, Apr. 1975, p. 74; or Ensign, May 1975, p. 50).

6. Lectures on Faith, 6:5.

7. Conference Report, Apr. 1995, p. 91; or Ensign, May 1995, p. 68.

8. Conference Report, Apr. 1978, pp.123­24; or Ensign, May 1978, p.81.

9. The Teachings of Harold B. Lee, Ed. Clyde J. Williams, [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1996] p.318.

 

 

Reference #1

 

1.  Moses 5:1-9 - Adam offers sacrifice

Question:  Where did this take place?

Answer
Heber C. Kimball
    The Prophet Joseph called upon Brother Brigham, myself and others, saying, "Brethren, come, go along with me, and I will show you something," He led us a short distance to a place where were the ruins of three altars built of stone, one above the other, and one standing a little back of the other, like unto the pulpits in the Kirtland Temple, representing the order of three grades of Priesthood; "There," said Joseph, "is the place where Adam offered up sacrifice after he was cast out of the garden." The altar stood at the highest point of the bluff. I went and examined the place several times while I remained there. (Life of Heber C. Kimball, pp. 209-210)

Wilford Woodruff
    The very first principle was faith in the Messiah; this was the first principle ever taught to man. When Adam, after being driven from the Garden of Eden, went to Adam-ondi-Ahman to offer sacrifice, the angel of the Lord asked him why he did so. Adam replied that he did not know, but the Lord had commanded him to do it. He was then told that the blood of bulls and goats, of rams and lambs should be spilt upon the altar as a type of the great and last sacrifice, which should be offered up for the sins of the world. The first principle, then, ever taught to Father Adam was faith in the Messiah, who was to come in the meridian of time to lay down his life for the redemption of man. The second principle was repentance. (The Discourses of Wilford Woodruff, p.18)

In the 6th chapter of Moses, we read the story of Enoch, beginning with the 51st verse we learn more about Adam’s experience when the Holy Ghost came upon him.

 

 (Moses 6:51-54.)

 

51 And he called upon our father Adam by his own voice, saying: I am God; I made the world, and men before they were in the flesh.

 

52 And he also said unto him: If thou wilt turn unto me, and hearken unto my voice, and believe, and repent of all thy transgressions, and be baptized, even in water, in the name of mine Only Begotten Son, who is full of grace and truth, which is Jesus Christ, the only name which shall be given under heaven, whereby salvation shall come unto the children of men, ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost, asking all things in his name, and whatsoever ye shall ask, it shall be given you.

 

53 And our father Adam spake unto the Lord, and said: Why is it that men must repent and be baptized in water? And the Lord said unto Adam: Behold I have forgiven thee thy transgression in the Garden of Eden.

 

54 Hence came the saying abroad among the people, that the Son of God hath atoned for original guilt, wherein the sins of the parents cannot be answered upon the heads of the children, for they are whole from the foundation of the world.

 

 

We learn from verses 53-54 that through Christ’s atonement original sin (our first spiritual death) was paid for everyone on this earth.

 

However, in verse 55 we learn at the time of our birth, everyone experiences a second spiritual death because of our spirits entering into our tabernacles of clay, becoming natural men.  Christ’s atonement covers our sins during our early years, but once we reach the age of accountability, then it is our responsibility to repent to overcome this spiritual death.

 

Verses 56-62 – The plan we must follow to overcome the natural man, to be spiritually born again so we may return to the presence of Heavenly Father.

 

(Moses 6:55-62.)

 

55 And the Lord spake unto Adam, saying: Inasmuch as thy children are conceived in sin, even so when they begin to grow up, sin conceiveth in their hearts, and they taste the bitter, that they may know to prize the good.

 

56 And it is given unto them to know good from evil; wherefore they are agents unto themselves, and I have given unto you another law and commandment.

 

57 Wherefore teach it unto your children, that all men, everywhere, must repent, or they can in nowise inherit the kingdom of God, for no unclean thing can dwell there, or dwell in his presence; for, in the language of Adam, Man of Holiness is his name, and the name of his Only Begotten is the Son of Man, even Jesus Christ, a righteous Judge, who shall come in the meridian of time.

 

58 Therefore I give unto you a commandment, to teach these things freely unto your children, saying:

 

59 That by reason of transgression cometh the fall, which fall bringeth death, and inasmuch as ye were born into the world by water, and blood, and the spirit, which I have made, and so became of dust a living soul, even so ye must be born again into the kingdom of heaven, of water, and of the Spirit, and be cleansed by blood, even the blood of mine Only Begotten; that ye might be sanctified from all sin, and enjoy the words of eternal life in this world, and eternal life in the world to come, even immortal glory;

 

60 For by the water ye keep the commandment; by the Spirit ye are justified, and by the blood ye are sanctified;

 

61 Therefore it is given to abide in you; the record of heaven; the Comforter; the peaceable things of immortal glory; the truth of all things; that which quickeneth all things, which maketh alive all things; that which knoweth all things, and hath all power according to wisdom, mercy, truth, justice, and judgment.

 

62 And now, behold, I say unto you: This is the plan of salvation unto all men, through the blood of mine Only Begotten, who shall come in the meridian of time.

 

 

Verses 64-68 – Adam shows us the way for all men to receive the necessary ordinances to be born again and become the sons and daughters of God.

 

(Moses 6:64-68.)

 

64 And it came to pass, when the Lord had spoken with Adam, our father, that Adam cried unto the Lord, and he was caught away by the Spirit of the Lord, and was carried down into the water, and was laid under the water, and was brought forth out of the water.  (Baptism)

 

65 And thus he was baptized, and the Spirit of God descended upon him, and thus he was born of the Spirit, and became quickened in the inner man.  (Gift of the Holy Ghost)

 

66 And he heard a voice out of heaven, saying: Thou art baptized with fire, and with the Holy Ghost. This is the record of the Father, and the Son, from henceforth and forever; (Baptism by Fire and the Holy Ghost)

 

67 And thou art after the order of him who was without beginning of days or end of years, from all eternity to all eternity.  (Temple Ordinances)

 

68 Behold, thou art one in me, a son of God; and thus may all become my sons. Amen.

 

 

Reference #2

 

2.  Moses 6:51-68 - Adam receives the ordinances of salvation

 

 

Question:  What is the "order of him who was without beginning of days or end of years"?

 

Answer:

Ezra Taft Benson

    When our Heavenly Father placed Adam and Eve on this earth, He did so with the purpose in mind of teaching them how to regain His presence. Our Father promised a Savior to redeem them from their fallen condition. He gave to them the plan of salvation and told them to teach their children faith in Jesus Christ and repentance. Further, Adam and his posterity were commanded by God to be baptized, to receive the Holy Ghost, and to enter into the order of the Son of God.
    To enter into the order of the Son of God is the equivalent today of entering into the fullness of the Melchizedek Priesthood, which is only received in the house of the Lord.
    Because Adam and Eve had complied with these requirements, God said to them, “Thou art after the order of him who was without beginning of days or end of years, from all eternity to all eternity.” (Moses 6:67.)  [From “What I Hope You Will Teach Your Children about the Temple,” Ensign, Aug. 1985, p. 8; emphasis added]


In Moses 6:68, we learn a very important doctrine – how to become a “Son of God”.  After we have completed all of the necessary ordinances, then we can fully partake of the at-one-ment that Christ has offered us as we:

 

    1. Are “one” with God
    2. Become a Son of God
    3. Help all to become sons and daughter of God

 

 

This is the purpose of the gospel of Jesus Christ, to receive all of the ordinances necessary in order to become joint-heirs with Christ of all the Father has.

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 11:30.)

 

30 But verily, verily, I say unto you, that as many as receive me, to them will I give power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on my name. Amen.

 

Adam and Eve were also married for time and all eternity in the Garden of Eden, before they were commanded to multiply and replenish the earth.  If this was not done, they would have committed sin once the Fall took place.

 

The transgression of Adam did not involve sex sin as some falsely believe and teach. Adam and Eve were married by the Lord while they were yet immortal beings in the Garden of Eden and before death entered the world.

 

(Joseph Fielding Smith, Doctrines of Salvation, 3 vols., edited by Bruce R. McConkie [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1954-1956], 1: 114.)

 

The events associated with the Garden of Eden make it the archetype of our temples. Here Adam received the priesthood, here Adam and Eve walked and talked with God; here our first parents were eternally married by God himself; here they learned of the tree of good and evil and of the tree of life; here they were taught the law of sacrifice and clothed in garments of skin; and from here they ventured into the lone and dreary world that they and their posterity might prove themselves worthy to return again to that divine presence.

(Joseph Fielding McConkie, Gospel Symbolism [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1999], 258.)

 

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 107:40-53.)

 

40 The order of this priesthood was confirmed to be handed down from father to son, and rightly belongs to the literal descendants of the chosen seed, to whom the promises were made.

 

41 This order was instituted in the days of Adam, and came down by lineage in the following manner:

 

42 From Adam to Seth, who was ordained by Adam at the age of sixty-nine years, and was blessed by him three years previous to his (Adam's) death, and received the promise of God by his father, that his posterity should be the chosen of the Lord, and that they should be preserved unto the end of the earth;

 

43 Because he (Seth) was a perfect man, and his likeness was the express likeness of his father, insomuch that he seemed to be like unto his father in all things, and could be distinguished from him only by his age.

 

44 Enos was ordained at the age of one hundred and thirty-four years and four months, by the hand of Adam.

 

45 God called upon Cainan in the wilderness in the fortieth year of his age; and he met Adam in journeying to the place Shedolamak. He was eighty-seven years old when he received his ordination.

 

46 Mahalaleel was four hundred and ninety-six years and seven days old when he was ordained by the hand of Adam, who also blessed him.

 

47 Jared was two hundred years old when he was ordained under the hand of Adam, who also blessed him.

 

48 Enoch was twenty-five years old when he was ordained under the hand of Adam; and he was sixty-five and Adam blessed him.

 

49 And he saw the Lord, and he walked with him, and was before his face continually; and he walked with God three hundred and sixty-five years, making him four hundred and thirty years old when he was translated.

 

50 Methuselah was one hundred years old when he was ordained under the hand of Adam.

 

51 Lamech was thirty-two years old when he was ordained under the hand of Seth.

 

52 Noah was ten years old when he was ordained under the hand of Methuselah.

 

53 Three years previous to the death of Adam, he called Seth, Enos, Cainan, Mahalaleel, Jared, Enoch, and Methuselah, who were all high priests, with the residue of his posterity who were righteous, into the valley of Adam-ondi-Ahman, and there bestowed upon them his last blessing.

 

 

Reference #3

 

3.  D&C 107:40-53 - Adam meets with his posterity at Adam-ondi-Ahman three years before his death
 

Question:  What was the purpose of this meeting?

Answer:

 

Ezra Taft Benson
   Three years before Adam’s death, a great event occurred. He took his son Seth, his grandson Enos, and other high priests who were his direct-line descendants, with others of his righteous posterity, into a valley called Adam-ondi-Ahman. There Adam gave to these righteous descendants his last blessing.
    The Lord then appeared to them.   ...
    The Prophet Joseph Smith said that Adam blessed his posterity because “he wanted to bring them into the presence of God.” (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, sel. Joseph Fielding Smith, Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1938, p. 159.) ...
    How did Adam bring his descendants into the presence of the Lord?
    The answer: Adam and his descendants entered into the priesthood order of God. Today we would say they went to the House of the Lord and received their blessings.(From “What I Hope You Will Teach Your Children about the Temple,” Ensign, Aug. 1985, p. 9)

 

Adam, in the valley of Adam-ondi-Ahman gave his posterity the temple ordinances necessary for them to return to the presence of our Heavenly Father.

 

Enoch used the same “blessings” and the order he entered into to teach his posterity, eventually leading them back to the presence of God.  These priesthood keys and ordinances were passed from generation to generation.

 

 

Reference #4

 

4.  Adam held the Keys of the Kingdom, which includes the right to perform the ordinances of salvation. 

Joseph Smith
    The Priesthood was first given to Adam; he obtained the First Presidency, and held the keys of it from generation to generation.  He obtained it in the Creation, before the world was formed, as in Genesis 1:26, 27, and 28.  He had dominion given him over every living creature. (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p.157)

 

Following the death of the Apostles, these keys were taken from the earth and the Apostasy took place.  Apostasy = loss of ordinances, “order”

 

 

Reference #5

 

5.  Restoration of the Temple Ordinances in the latter-days
 

A.  Joseph Smith History 1:38-39

 

Joseph Fielding Smith
    When Moroni came to Joseph Smith in September 1823, he quoted to him these words which the Lord had given to Malachi: "Behold, I will reveal unto you the Priesthood, by the hand of Elijah the prophet, before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the Lord." (D&C 2:1)
    To prepare the way for the coming of Elijah and the restoration of the sealing power, because of which men may receive the fullness of the priesthood, John the Baptist came in May of 1829 and conferred upon Joseph and Oliver the Aaronic Priesthood. A short time later Peter, James, and John came and gave them the Melchizedek Priesthood.
    Then on April 3, 1836, in the Kirtland Temple, Elijah the prophet returned and bestowed upon them the sealing power, the power to use the priesthood to bind on earth and seal in heaven. (Improvement Era, June 1970, p.65; emphasis added)

 

The priesthood was restored as follows:

 

    1. Aaronic Priesthood – John the Baptist

 

    1. Melchizedek Priesthood – Peter, James and John

 

    1. The Fulness of the Priesthood – Moses, Elias and Elijah (D&C 110:11-15)

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 110:11-16.)

 

11 After this vision closed, the heavens were again opened unto us; and Moses appeared before us, and committed unto us the keys of the gathering of Israel from the four parts of the earth, and the leading of the ten tribes from the land of the north.

 

12 After this, Elias appeared, and committed the dispensation of the gospel of Abraham, saying that in us and our seed all generations after us should be blessed.

 

13 After this vision had closed, another great and glorious vision burst upon us; for Elijah the prophet, who was taken to heaven without tasting death, stood before us, and said:

 

14 Behold, the time has fully come, which was spoken of by the mouth of Malachi—testifying that he [Elijah] should be sent, before the great and dreadful day of the Lord come—

 

15 To turn the hearts of the fathers to the children, and the children to the fathers, lest the whole earth be smitten with a curse—

 

16 Therefore, the keys of this dispensation are committed into your hands; and by this ye may know that the great and dreadful day of the Lord is near, even at the doors.

 

 

Moses restored the gathering = the gathering to the temple of the Lord to obtain the necessary ordinances to return to the presence of our Heavenly Father.

 

Elias restored the marriage ordinance (Abrahamic Covenant)

 

    1. Posterity

 

    1. Land

 

    1. Descendants would have the priesthood

 

 

Elijah restored the sealing powers, so that which was bound on earth would be bound in heaven.  The spirit of Elijah is the same as the Holy Spirit of Promise and is sufficient to make one’s calling and election sure.  This is only possible when we have sacrificed our heart, might, mind and strength unto the Lord.

 

When we are married in the temple and sealed for time and all eternity, it is only a temporary sealing.  In order for the sealing to be eternal it must be ratified by the Holy Spirit of Promise.

 

Elder Bruce R. McConkie

 

Of the First Council of the Seventy

 

We believe in the law of justification. By virtue of this law, if a man walks, acts, and lives in this life in such a manner that his conduct is justified by the Spirit, he eventually will attain an inheritance in the celestial world.

 

On the day the Church was organized, April 6, 1830, the Prophet, writing by way of prophecy and revelation, summarized the basic doctrines of the Church. Among other things he wrote this:

 

And we know that justification through the grace of our lord and Savior Jesus Christ is just and true. (D & C 20:30.)

 

In the summary of the gospel law given in the days of Father Adam, we find this sentence:

 

For by the water ye keep the commandment; by the Spirit ye are justified, and by the blood ye are sanctified. (Moses 6:60.)

 

In the early 1830's, when the Lord was talking to the Prophet about what is called the new and everlasting covenant—that is, about the fulness of the gospel—he revealed this further truth relative to this great law of justification, and I think these following words are a perfect one sentence summary of the whole law of the whole gospel. The Lord said:

 

. . . All covenants, contracts, bonds, obligations, oaths, vows, performances, connections, associations, or expectations, that are not made and entered into and sealed by the Holy Spirit of promise, of him who is anointed, both as well for time and for all eternity, and that too most holy, by revelation and commandment through the medium of mine anointed, whom I have appointed on the earth to hold this power . . . are of no efficacy, virtue, or force in and after the resurrection from the dead. (D & C 132:7.)

 

One more expression in the revelations has bearing on this. The Lord said:

 

. . . the Holy Spirit of promise, which the Father sheds forth upon all those who are just and true. (D & C 76:53.)

 

Now, to justify is to seal, or to ratify, or to approve; and it is very evident from these revelations that every act that we do, if it is to have binding and sealing virtue in eternity, must be justified by the Spirit. In other words, it must be ratified by the Holy Ghost; or in other words, it must be sealed by the Holy Spirit of Promise.

 

All of us know that we can deceive men. We can deceive our bishops or the other Church agents, unless at the moment their minds are lighted by the spirit of revelation; but we cannot deceive the Lord. We cannot get from him an unearned blessing. There will be an eventual day when all men will get exactly and precisely what they have merited and earned, neither adding to nor subtracting from. You cannot with success lie to the Holy Ghost.

 

Now let us take a simple illustration. If an individual is to gain an inheritance in the celestial world, he has to enter in at the gate of baptism, that ordinance being performed under the hands of a legal administrator. If he comes forward prepared by worthiness, that is, if he is just and true, and gains baptism under the hands of a legal administrator, he is justified by the Spirit in the act which has been performed; that is, it is ratified by the Holy Ghost, or it is sealed by the Holy Spirit of Promise. As a result it is of full force and validity in this life and in the life to come.

 

If an individual thereafter turns from righteousness and goes off and wallows in the mire of iniquity, then the seal is removed, and so we have this principle which keeps the unworthy from gaining unearned blessings. The Lord has placed a bar which stops the progress of the unrighteous; he has placed a requirement which we must meet. We must gain the approval and receive the sanctifying power of the Holy Ghost if eventually and in eternity we are to reap the blessings that we hope to reap.

 

The same thing that is true of baptism is true of marriage. If a couple comes forward worthily, a couple who is just and true, and they enter into that ordinance under the hands of a legal administrator, a seal of approval is recorded in heaven. Then assuming they do not thereafter break that seal, assuming they keep the covenant and press forward in steadfastness and in righteousness, they go on in the next world as husband and wife; and in and after the resurrection, that ordinance performed in such a binding manner here has full force, efficacy, and validity.

 

I think perhaps this doctrine, as almost all other doctrines that we teach in the Church, leads us back to the same central conclusion, which is that it is obligatory upon us to keep the commandments of God if we ever expect to inherit the blessings that he has promised the Saints. We should remind ourselves again and again of these words which he has spoken:

 

. . . he who doeth the works of righteousness shall receive his reward, even peace in this world, and eternal life in the world to come. (D & C 59:23.)

 

In the name of Jesus Christ. Amen.

 

 

(Elder Bruce R. McConkie, Conference Report, April 1956, Afternoon Meeting 64.)

 

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 124:25-28.)

 

25 And again, verily I say unto you, let all my saints come from afar.

 

26 And send ye swift messengers, yea, chosen messengers, and say unto them: Come ye, with all your gold, and your silver, and your precious stones, and with all your antiquities; and with all who have knowledge of antiquities, that will come, may come, and bring the box-tree, and the fir-tree, and the pine-tree, together with all the precious trees of the earth;

 

27 And with iron, with copper, and with brass, and with zinc, and with all your precious things of the earth; and build a house to my name, for the Most High to dwell therein.

 

28 For there is not a place found on earth that he may come to and restore again that which was lost unto you, or which he hath taken away, even the fulness of the priesthood.

 

In Nauvoo the member of the church were once again commanded to build a temple so that the sealing powers (fulness of the priesthood) could once again be found on the earth.

 

The Nauvoo Temple was not being built fast enough and the Prophet Joseph knew his time on earth was drawing to a close.  So he was commanded by the Lord to perform these ordinances in the upper room of the Red Brick store.

 

Reference #6

 

 

B. The restoration of the temple ordinances

Joseph Smith
    Wednesday, 4.--I spent the day in the upper part of the store, that is in my private office (so called because in that room I keep my sacred writings, translate ancient records, and receive revelations) and in my general business office, or lodge room (that is where the Masonic fraternity meet occasionally, for want of a better place) in council with General James Adams, of Springfield, Patriarch Hyrum Smith, Bishops Newel K. Whitney and George Miller, and President Brigham Young and Elders Heber C. Kimball and Willard Richards, instructing them in the principles and order of the Priesthood, attending to washings, anointings, endowments and the communication of keys pertaining to the Aaronic Priesthood, and so on to the highest order of the Melchisedek Priesthood, setting forth the order pertaining to the Ancient of Days, and all those plans and principles by which any one is enabled to secure the fullness of those blessings which have been prepared for the Church of the First Born, and come up and abide in the presence of the Eloheim in the eternal worlds. In this council was instituted the ancient order of things for the first time in these last days. And the communications I made to this council were of things spiritual, and to be received only by the I spiritual minded: and there was nothing made known to these men but what will be made known to all the Saints of the last days, so soon as they are prepared to receive, and a proper place is prepared to communicate them, even to the weakest of the Saints; therefore let the Saints be diligent in building the Temple, and all houses which they have been, or shall hereafter be, commanded of God to build; and wait their time with patience in all meekness, faith, perseverance unto the end, knowing assuredly that all these things referred to in this council are always governed by the principle of revelation.

    Thursday, 5.--General Adams started for Springfield, and the remainder of the council of yesterday continued their meeting at the same place, and myself and Brother Hyrum received in turn from the others, the same that I had communicated to them the day previous.    (History of the Church, 5:1-2; emphasis added)

 

 

Just as Father Adam had blessed his posterity with his “last blessing”, the Prophet Joseph Smith restored the ordinances necessary for us to return to our Heavenly Father, in this, the dispensation of the fulness of times.  With these ordinances, we can fully partake of the Lord’s atonement and become sons and daughters of God, joint heirs with Christ and receive all that our Father hath.

 

The Endowment of Jacob

(Genesis 28)

Of this event, Joseph Smith stated: 

"Wherefore, we again say, search the revelations of God; study the prophecies, and rejoice that God grants unto the world Seers and Prophets. They are they who saw the mysteries of godliness; they saw the flood before it came; they saw angels ascending and descending upon a ladder that reached from earth to heaven ..." (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith,  p.12)

"Paul ascended into the third heavens, and he could understand the three principal rounds of Jacob's ladder—the telestial, the terrestrial, and the celestial glories or kingdoms, where Paul saw and heard things which were not lawful for him to utter. I could explain a hundred fold more than I ever have of the glories of the kingdoms manifested to me in the vision, were I permitted, and were the people prepared to receive them." (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith,  p.304)

 

That Jacob was experiencing a temple endowment is made clear by Elder Marion G. Romney of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles:

Pondering upon the subject of temples and the means therein provided to enable us to ascend into heaven brings to mind the lesson of Jacob’s dream. You will recall that in the twenty-eighth chapter of Genesis there is an account of his return to the land of his father to seek a wife from among his own people. When Jacob traveled from Beersheba toward Haran, he had a dream in which he saw himself on the earth at the foot of a ladder that reached to heaven where the Lord stood above it. He beheld angels ascending and descending thereon, and Jacob realized that the covenants he made with the Lord there were the rungs on the ladder that he himself would have to climb in order to obtain the promised blessings—blessings that would entitle him to enter heaven and associate with the Lord.

Because he had met the Lord and entered into covenants with him there, Jacob considered the site so sacred that he named the place Bethel, a contraction of Beth-Elohim, which means literally “the House of the Lord.” He said of it: “… this is none other but the house of God, and this is the gate of heaven.” (Gen. 28:17.)
Jacob not only passed through the gate of heaven, but by living up to every covenant he also went all the way in. Of him and his forebears Abraham and Isaac, the Lord has said: “… because they did none other things than that which they were commanded, they have entered into their exaltation, according to the promises, and sit upon thrones, and are not angels but are gods.” (D&C 132:37.)

Temples are to us all what Bethel was to Jacob. Even more, they are also the gates to heaven for all of our unendowed kindred dead. We should all do our duty in bringing our loved ones through them.  (“Temples—The Gates to Heaven,” Ensign, March 1971, p. 16)

 

Religious Lecture Series

1st Corinthians

February 24, 2007

 

(Acts 1:6-10.) – The end of Christ’s mortal and immortal ministry with His apostles.

 

6 When they therefore were come together, they asked of him, saying, Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel?

 

7 And he said unto them, It is not for you to know the times or the seasons, which the Father hath put in his own power.

 

8 But ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem, and in all Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth.

 

9 And when he had spoken these things, while they beheld, he was taken up; and a cloud received him out of their sight.

 

10 And while they looked stedfastly toward heaven as he went up, behold, two men stood by them in white apparel;

 

First take the gospel to the Jews, then to the Samaritans, then to the entire world.

 

(Acts 6:1.) – 2 types of Jews

 

1 And in those days, when the number of the disciples was multiplied, there arose a murmuring of the Grecians against the Hebrews, because their widows were neglected in the daily ministration.

 

There were 3 groups within the Early Christian church during the time of the Apostles, Acts 6.

1.       Hellenized Jews – Accepted the Greek and Roman ways of life while still being Jews

2.       Orthodox Jews – They wanted to go back to living the Law of Moses, tied to tradition, they thought every one else should live the law before becoming a Christian.  The Council of Jerusalem in Acts 15 addressed the issue

3.       Gentile converts – Came into the church after the revelation to Peter in Acts 10

 

We have traditions in the Church today, missionary farewells and banquets after church on Sunday’s when the missionary talks!  President McKay told the Church decades ago to stop the practice.

Paul was a persecutor of the Church in his early years.  He was doing missionary work in spreading the gospel during these times.  Christians left for other areas when he showed up in a city!  Thus the gospel spread to other areas!  ;-)

Paul leaves no doubt about his orthodox training: "Circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching the law, a Pharisee" (Philip. 3:5). His parents obviously had pride in their heritage, as shown by their naming him "Saul" after the first king of Israel, the most brilliant star of Benjamin. In Acts this is Paul's proper name before he gave his life to the Gentile missions. fn The Mishnah outlines the education of the orthodox boy, who began studying scripture at five and advanced Rabbinical interpretation at fifteen. fn Paul went from Tarsus to Jerusalem; when arrested there, he reviewed his training: "Born in Tarsus . . . yet brought up in this city at the feet of Gamaliel, and taught according to the perfect manner of the law of the fathers" (Acts 22:3). Tarsus itself broadened Paul, for Jews of the dispersion knew many sincere people outside their faith. And in Jerusalem Paul studied with a rabbi whose character shows a combination of devotedness and breadth. Grandson of Hillel, whose teaching also combined these elements, he towers in the early Mishnah tradition: "When Rabban Gamaliel the Elder died, the glory of the Law ceased, and purity and abstinence died." fn And when the Sanhedrin was close to sentencing the apostles to death, "a Pharisee named Gamaliel" arose, "a doctor of the law, had in reputation among all people" (Acts 5:34). His advice was blunt—impostors will fall of their own weight, but religious leaders cannot risk fighting "against God" (Acts 5:39).

 

This event poses searching but unanswerable questions. Gamaliel's tolerance for Christian leaders was not long after the crucifixion. Was he also a member of the Sanhedrin that condemned Jesus? Since he surely heard Jesus sometime, had he been so shaken by Jesus' manhood that he entertained the possibility of godhood? An inner-circle Pharisee, he knew many resurrection stories behind the public testimony of Peter and John. And where was Paul during these events? And did he ask Gamaliel about his cautious tolerance of Christian leaders? Paul was born about the beginning of the Christian era, since Acts calls him a "young man" when Stephen was stoned about A.D. 33 (Acts 7:58). fn His formal study under Gamaliel would fall before A.D. 20, long before Jesus' public ministry began. Paul nowhere hints that he saw or heard the earthly Jesus. Perhaps he was pursuing family and business interests at Tarsus during the ministry of the Lord. Perhaps he was called to Jerusalem afterward for his religious commitment and skill in practical affairs. Was he nominated by a troubled Gamaliel?

 

Paul's credentials illuminate the debated question of his marriage. He is mislabeled a bachelor or chauvinist, for careful study of 1 Corinthians strongly suggests his marriage. There are three elements of this problem in Paul's early life: the Jewish ideal of marriage as a religious duty; Paul's obedience to every possible Jewish duty; Paul's acceptance into high Jewish councils. The last point is often stated as though Paul was a member of the highest Jewish council, the Sanhedrin, whose members supposedly were married. Yet the evidence for marriage of Sanhedrin members is the same as for any other successful Israelite—religious and cultural conformity. Wisdom and trustworthiness came only through marriage; in the time of the Mishnah "an unmarried man may not be a teacher of children." The Mishnah includes marriage in the life pattern of the male, who was fit "at eighteen for the bride chamber." No one could fault Paul for disobedience to any commandment, he insisted, "touching the righteousness which is in the law, blameless" (Philip. 3:6). In Paul's view, no one exceeded him in keeping every requirement, none of his "peers" or "equals of age," the key term in his autobiographical survey—"I advanced in Judaism beyond many of my own age among my people, so extremely zealous was I for the traditions of my fathers" (Gal. 1:14, RSV). Since he had done everything right in his religion up to that point, he must have been married.

 

Against accused Christians Paul gave his "voice," a Greek word meaning "vote," as modern translations recognize (Acts 26:10). But the full Sanhedrin would not supervise details of Christian persecutions, so Paul's vote is probably that of a trusted assistant in small executive sessions. As mentioned, he was then a "young man" (Acts 7:58), which must be put in the Jewish context of thirty for temple service and mature status in the Dead Sea community. The Mishnah lists the age of "twenty for pursuing [a calling]," an age when Paul might have terminated his Jerusalem studies and returned to Tarsus for business. The Mishnah continues with "thirty for authority," a point after which Paul might be called to Jerusalem to meet the Christian threat as thousands of Jews converted to Christianity after the Crucifixion (Acts 2:41; 4:4). But the "young man" reference contradicts the idea of Paul as an elder statesman; the Sanhedrin member would be middle aged on the Mishnah's maturity scale. There, a man is ready "at forty for discernment, at fifty for counsel, at sixty for to be an elder." fn

 

Paul represented the Sanhedrin's inner circle, as he said of his power as persecutor "in Jerusalem"—"and many of the saints did I shut up in prison, having received authority from the chief priests . . . and I punished them oft in every synagogue" (Acts 26:10-11). Years before, the Savior warned his first apostles of the misplaced zeal of oppressors: "The hour is coming when whoever kills you will think he is offering service to God" (John 16:2, RSV). That is just how Paul explains himself—he carefully concluded that duty required persecution of Jesus' disciples (Acts 26:9); out of "zeal" for God, he persecuted Christians (Philip. 3:6). He later obtained forgiveness, he said, because he had persecuted "ignorantly in unbelief" (1 Tim. 1:13). He was a formidable foe, using every tool except moderation (Gal. 1:13). He forced some to renounce their faith (Acts 26:11), but many firmly faced pain and punishment because of their inner certainty. Short of the death penalty, the Romans freely allowed Jewish councils the right to discipline as a sort of common law. This meant that Paul supervised investigation, interrogation, and sentencing. Of this last role, he says, "I imprisoned and beat" the believers "in every synagogue" (Acts 22:19). Moses had allowed a maximum of forty stripes (Deut. 25:1-3), and the Mishnah shows that such punishment was widely used for a variety of legal transgressions, including breaking vows. The Gospels also portray Jesus as close to stoning for blasphemy on more than one occasion, and Paul was an official observer at the unauthorized execution of Stephen, for the crowd took Stephen from the council "out of the city, and stoned him, and the witnesses laid down their clothes at a young man's feet, whose name was Saul" (Acts 7:58). Luke thus introduces Paul into the Christian story, significantly not with a vision, but with the persecution before the vision.

 

 

(Richard Lloyd Anderson, Understanding Paul [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1983], 23.)

Paul’s missions were very successful, but problems developed when Gentiles came in among Jewish Christians, they weren’t treated the same.  Paul was a very zealous missionary; he rubbed people the wrong way, he was forceful in declaring Christ, Acts 17 at Mars Hill.

(Acts 17:21-32.)

 

21 (For all the Athenians and strangers which were there spent their time in nothing else, but either to tell, or to hear some new thing.)

 

22 ¶ Then Paul stood in the midst of Mars' hill, and said, Ye men of Athens, I perceive that in all things ye are too superstitious.

 

23 For as I passed by, and beheld your devotions, I found an altar with this inscription, TO THE UNKNOWN GOD. Whom therefore ye ignorantly worship, him declare I unto you.

 

24 God that made the world and all things therein, seeing that he is Lord of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands;

 

25 Neither is worshipped with men's hands, as though he needed any thing, seeing he giveth to all life, and breath, and all things;

 

26 And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation;

 

27 That they should seek the Lord, if haply they might feel after him, and find him, though he be not far from every one of us:

 

28 For in him we live, and move, and have our being; as certain also of your own poets have said, For we are also his offspring.

 

29 Forasmuch then as we are the offspring of God, we ought not to think that the Godhead is like unto gold, or silver, or stone, graven by art and man's device.

 

30 And the times of this ignorance God winked at; but now commandeth all men every where to repent:

 

31 Because he hath appointed a day, in the which he will judge the world in righteousness by that man whom he hath ordained; whereof he hath given assurance unto all men, in that he hath raised him from the dead.

 

32 ¶ And when they heard of the resurrection of the dead, some mocked: and others said, We will hear thee again of this matter.

 

The Greek and Roman culture did not see sin in the same way those in the church did.  Doctrine dictates behavior not our culture.

BIBLE DICTIONARY
Pauline Epistles

 

Epistles to the Corinthians

 

 Corinth was the meeting point of many nationalities because the main current of the trade between Asia and western Europe passed through its harbors. Paul's first visit lasted nearly two years; his converts were mainly Greeks, men gifted by race with a keen sense of the joys of physical existence, with a passion for freedom and a genius for rhetoric and logic, but reared in the midst of the grossest moral corruption, undisciplined and self-conceited. Some time before 1 Cor. 2 was written he paid them a second visit (2 Cor. 12: 14; 2 Cor. 13: 1) to check some rising disorder (2 Cor. 2: 1; 2 Cor. 13: 2), and wrote them a letter, now lost (1 Cor. 5: 9). They had also been visited by Apollos (Acts 18: 27), perhaps by Peter (1 Cor. 1: 12), and by some Jewish Christians who brought with them letters of commendation from Jerusalem (1 Cor. 1: 12; 2 Cor. 3: 1; 2 Cor. 5: 16; 2 Cor. 11: 23).

 

Analysis of 1 Corinthians

 

1. Salutation and Thanksgiving (1 Cor. 1: 1-9).

2. Rebuke of the Corinthian Church for lack of unity (1 Cor. 1: 10 - 6: 20).

a. The spirit of partisanship and insubordination (1 Cor. 1: 10 - 4: 21).

b. The case of impurity (1 Cor. 5: 1-13; 1 Cor. 6: 9-20).

c. The lawsuits (1 Cor. 6: 1-9).

3. Paul's reply to inquiries made by them as to

a. Marriage (1 Cor. 7: 1-40).

b. Meat offered to idols (1 Cor. 8: 1 - 11: 1).

c. The order of worship, with special reference to the Lord's Supper and the use of spiritual gifts (1 Cor. 11: 2 - 14: 40). This section contains 1 Cor. 12: 31 - 13: 13) a magnificent description of love, the greatest in the trio of things that abide forever.

4. Doctrine of the resurrection -

a. Of Christ (1 Cor. 15: 1-19).

b. Of the dead (1 Cor. 15: 20-34).

c. Degrees of glory (1 Cor. 15: 35-58).

5. Directions about a collection for the Christian poor at Jerusalem; information about Paul's, Timothy's, and Apollos's plans; final exhortations and salutation (1 Cor. 16: 1-24).

Soon after writing the first epistle Paul was driven from Ephesus by a riot (Acts 19). In Macedonia he met Titus (2 Cor. 7: 6), who brought him news from Corinth that his letter had been well received and had produced the desired effect; the Church had cleared itself of all complicity in a sexual offense and had excommunicated the offender (2 Cor. 2: 5-11). But Paul found that a personal coolness had sprung up between himself and his converts (2 Cor. 7: 2; 2 Cor. 12: 15), which unscrupulous opponents were turning to their own account.

The culture in Corinth was opposite the way of a gospel life, the city was immoral, full of idol worship; temples to idols were all over the city,  it was known throughout the Roman world as an immoral culture.  It was a great distraction to saints trying to live the gospel.

Zion in the Midst of Babylon – This was one of my favorite Conference talks of all time.

Elder David R. Stone – He was born and raised in Argentina
Of the Seventy

We do not need to adopt the standards, the mores, and the morals of Babylon. We can create Zion in the midst of Babylon.

Last summer, my wife and I had the opportunity to travel to San Diego, California, and there see Shakespeare's Macbeth at the Old Globe Theatre. We saw two performances, because our daughter Carolyn was playing the part of one of the three witches in that play. Of course, we were delighted to see her in the play and even more delighted when, at a dramatic moment, she said those famous lines: "By the pricking of my thumbs, / Something wicked this way comes" (act 4, scene 1, lines 40–41).

When I heard that, I thought how useful it would be to have an early-warning system which would tell us about the approach of evil and allow us to be prepared for it. Evil is coming toward us, whether or not we have an early-warning system.

On a later occasion, my wife and I were driving cross-country one night and were approaching a great city. As we came over the hills and saw the bright lights on the horizon, I nudged my wife awake and said, "Behold the city of Babylon!"

Of course, there is no particular city today which personifies Babylon. Babylon was, in the time of ancient Israel, a city which had become sensual, decadent, and corrupt. The principal building in the city was a temple to a false god, which we often refer to as Bel or Baal.

However, that sensuality, corruption, and decadence, and the worshipping of false gods are to be seen in many cities, great and small, scattered across the globe. As the Lord has said: "They seek not the Lord to establish his righteousness, but every man walketh in his own way, and after the image of his own god, whose image is in the likeness of the world" (D&C 1:16).

Too many of the people of the world have come to resemble the Babylon of old by walking in their own ways, and following a god "whose image is in the likeness of the world."

One of the greatest challenges we will face is to be able to live in that world but somehow not be of that world. We have to create Zion in the midst of Babylon.

"Zion in the midst of Babylon." What a luminous and incandescent phrase, as a light shining in the midst of spiritual darkness. What a concept to hold close to our hearts, as we see Babylon becoming more widespread. We see Babylon in our cities; we see Babylon in our communities; we see Babylon everywhere.

And with the encroachment of Babylon, we have to create Zion in the midst of it. We should not allow ourselves to be engulfed by the culture which surrounds us. We seldom realize the extent to which we are a product of the culture of our place and time.

During the days of ancient Israel, the people of the Lord were an island of the one true God, surrounded by an ocean of idolatry. The waves of that ocean crashed incessantly upon the shores of Israel. Despite the commandment to make no graven image and bow down before it, Israel seemingly could not help itself, influenced by the culture of the place and time. Over and over again—despite the prohibition of the Lord, despite what prophet and priest had said—Israel went seeking after strange gods and bowed down before them.

How could Israel have forgotten the Lord, who brought them out of Egypt? They were constantly pressured by what was popular in the ambience in which they lived.

What an insidious thing is this culture amidst which we live. It permeates our environment, and we think we are being reasonable and logical when, all too often, we have been molded by the ethos, what the Germans call the zeitgeist, or the culture of our place and time.

Because my wife and I have had the opportunity to live in 10 different countries, we have seen the effect of the ethos on behavior. Customs which are perfectly acceptable in one culture are viewed as unacceptable in another; language which is polite in some places is viewed as abhorrent in others. People in every culture move within a cocoon of self-satisfied self-deception, fully convinced that the way they see things is the way things really are.

Our culture tends to determine what foods we like, how we dress, what constitutes polite behavior, what sports we should follow, what our taste in music should be, the importance of education, and our attitudes toward honesty. It also influences men as to the importance of recreation or religion, influences women about the priority of career or childbearing, and has a powerful effect on how we approach procreation and moral issues. All too often, we are like puppets on a string, as our culture determines what is "cool."

There is, of course, a zeitgeist to which we should pay attention, and that is the ethos of the Lord, the culture of the people of God. As Peter states it, "But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light" (1 Peter 2:9).

It is the ethos of those who keep the Lord's commandments, walk in His ways, and "live by every word that proceedeth forth from the mouth of God" (D&C 84:44). If that makes us peculiar, so be it.

My involvement with the building of the Manhattan temple gave me the opportunity to be in the temple quite often prior to the dedication. It was wonderful to sit in the celestial room and be there in perfect silence, without a single sound to be heard coming from the busy New York streets outside. How was it possible that the temple could be so reverently silent when the hustle and bustle of the metropolis was just a few yards away?

The answer was in the construction of the temple. The temple was built within the walls of an existing building, and the inner walls of the temple were connected to the outer walls at only a very few junction points. That is how the temple (Zion) limited the effects of Babylon, or the world outside.

There may be a lesson here for us. We can create the real Zion among us by limiting the extent to which Babylon will influence our lives.

When, about 600 years B.C., Nebuchadnezzar came from Babylon and conquered Judah, he carried away the people of the Lord. Nebuchadnezzar selected some of the young men for special education and training.

Among them were Daniel, Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah. They were to be the favored ones among the young people brought to Babylon. The king's servant instructed them that they were to eat of the king's meat and drink of the king's wine.

Let us clearly understand the pressures that the four young men were under. They had been carried away as captives by a conquering power and were in the household of a king who held the power of life or death over them. And yet Daniel and his brothers refused to do that which they believed to be wrong, however much the Babylonian culture believed it to be right. And for that fidelity and courage, the Lord blessed them and "gave them knowledge and skill in all learning and wisdom" (Daniel 1:17).

Seduced by our culture, we often hardly recognize our idolatry, as our strings are pulled by that which is popular in the Babylonian world. Indeed, as the poet Wordsworth said: "The world is too much with us" ("The World Is Too Much with Us; Late and Soon," in The Complete Poetical Works of William Wordsworth [1924], 353).

In his first epistle, John writes:

"I have written unto you . . . because ye are strong, and the word of God abideth in you, and ye have overcome the wicked one.

"Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world" (1 John 2:14–15).

We do not need to adopt the standards, the mores, and the morals of Babylon. We can create Zion in the midst of Babylon. We can have our own standards for music and literature and dance and film and language. We can have our own standards for dress and deportment, for politeness and respect. We can live in accordance with the Lord's moral laws. We can limit how much of Babylon we allow into our homes by the media of communication.

We can live as a Zion people, if we wish to. Will it be hard? Of course it will, for the waves of Babylonian culture crash incessantly against our shores. Will it take courage? Of course it will.

We have always been entranced by tales of courage of those who faced fearsome odds and overcame. Courage is the basis and foundation for all of our other virtues; the lack of courage diminishes every other virtue that we have. If we are to have Zion in the midst of Babylon, we will need courage.

Have you ever imagined that, when it came to the test, you would perform some act of bravery? I know I did, as a boy. I imagined that someone was in peril and that, at the risk of my own life, I saved him. Or in some dangerous confrontation with a fearsome opponent, I had the courage to overcome. Such are our youthful imaginations!

Almost 70 years of life have taught me that those heroic opportunities are few and far between, if they come at all.

But the opportunities to stand for that which is right—when the pressures are subtle and when even our friends are encouraging us to give in to the idolatry of the times—those come along far more frequently. No photographer is there to record the heroism, no journalist will splash it across the newspaper's front page. Just in the quiet contemplation of our conscience, we will know that we faced the test of courage: Zion or Babylon?

Make no mistake about it: much of Babylon, if not most of it, is evil. And we will not have the pricking of our thumbs to warn us. But wave after wave is coming, crashing against our shores. Will it be Zion, or will it be Babylon?

If Babylon is the city of the world, Zion is the city of God. The Lord has said of Zion: "Zion cannot be built up unless it is by the principles of the law of the celestial kingdom" (D&C 105:5) and, "For this is Zion—the pure in heart" (D&C 97:21).

Wherever we are, whatever city we may live in, we can build our own Zion by the principles of the celestial kingdom and ever seek to become the pure in heart. Zion is the beautiful, and the Lord holds it in His own hands. Our homes can be places which are a refuge and protection, as Zion is.

We do not need to become as puppets in the hands of the culture of the place and time. We can be courageous and can walk in the Lord's paths and follow His footsteps. And if we do, we will be called Zion, and we will be the people of the Lord.

I pray that we will be strengthened to resist the onslaught of Babylon and that we can create Zion in our homes and our communities—indeed, that we may have "Zion in the midst of Babylon."

We seek Zion because it is the habitation of our Lord, who is Jesus Christ, our Savior and Redeemer. In Zion and from Zion, His luminous and incandescent light will shine forth, and He will rule forever. I bear witness that He lives and loves us and will watch over us.

In the name of Jesus Christ, amen.

It is hard to be a Mormon in the American culture, Hollywood is pro dysfunctional family, it is opposed to gospel living and its teachings. 

Purpose of the Honor Code – To help create a more righteous culture to help promote the Holy Ghost in the lives of the students

THE HOLY GHOST BRINGS TESTIMONY, UNITY, AND SPIRITUAL GIFTS

 

Rex C. Reeve Jr.

 

Rex C. Reeve Jr. is associate professor of ancient scripture at Brigham Young University.

 

The Greek world in Paul's day had very little concern for moral law. There was an emphasis on the joys of physical existence, and typical of many societies, outward appearance, rhetoric, discussion, and physical possessions were more important than personal righteousness. Corinth, with its sailors, freighters, and diverse population, had its share of wickedness and moral corruption. And yet in Corinth Paul found many good people prepared and willing to receive and learn to live the gospel of Jesus Christ.

 

Corinth was a very active business and commercial center and the meeting point of many nationalities. The chief town of the Roman province of Achaia, it was destroyed in 146 B.C. during the Roman conquest, but because of its important location, it was rebuilt by Julius Caesar about 50 B.C. It was situated on the isthmus connecting the Peloponnese peninsula with the mainland of Greece and had harbors on both the eastern and western sides. Much of the ancient trade between Asia and Western Europe passed through its harbors. To avoid the long and dangerous voyage around the Peloponnese, merchants unloaded their goods at one harbor, transported them overland across the isthmus, and reloaded them on ships to continue their journey to all parts of the world.

 

"This trade center was also a center of wickedness. . . . The big cities of the Roman empire were like today's big cities in offering the best and the worst. . . . Yet the existence of bad society does not make all society bad. The Lord stood before Paul in vision and commanded him to stay and gather his people out of this worldly center." fn

 

Paul first visited Corinth about A.D. 50 during his second missionary journey. He began teaching in the Jewish synagogue as was his custom. When persecution arose, the Lord instructed Paul to remain in Corinth and continue teaching among the Gentiles, because the Lord had many people in that city. Paul labored about eighteen months in Corinth, during which time many believed and were baptized (Acts 18:1-11).

 

Paul wrote 1 Corinthians about A.D. 57 while he was in Ephesus on his third missionary journey. He had received several reports of problems that had developed among the Church members in Corinth. From the household of a woman named Chloe he learned of contentions and factions in the branch (1 Corinthians 1:11). He learned of serious moral sins among the members (1 Corinthians 5:1-3) and that there was misunderstanding about the use and purpose of spiritual gifts (1 Corinthians 12:1-2). In addition to those problems, the Corinthians had written to Paul asking important questions that needed answers (1 Corinthians 7:1). The challenge for Paul was to help these early Church members understand "that your faith should not stand in the wisdom of men, but in the power of God" (1 Corinthians 2:5). The solutions to their problems and the answers to their questions could only be found as they better understood the doctrines and conformed their lives to the teachings of the gospel of Jesus Christ. Paul therefore taught the Saints to seek the companionship of the Holy Ghost, which brings testimony, unity, and all the benefits of spiritual gifts.

 

Seek the Companionship of the Holy Ghost

 

Having the companionship of the Holy Ghost is the key gift that all should seek and develop. With that companionship individuals can know and testify that Jesus is the Lord and can have access to a diversity of other spiritual gifts. "Wherefore I give you to understand, that no man speaking by the Spirit of God calleth Jesus accursed: and that no man can say that Jesus is the Lord, but by the Holy Ghost. Now there are diversities of gifts, but the same Spirit" (1 Corinthians 12:3-4). Individuals may say things without the aid of the Holy Ghost, but they may not be assured of eternal truths without the influence of that member of the Godhead. The Prophet Joseph Smith said that 1 Corinthians 12:3 should be translated "no man can know that Jesus is the Lord, but by the Holy Ghost." fn As members have more companionship with the Holy Ghost, in addition to a stronger personal testimony of Christ, they will experience the spiritual gift of unity, which is essential in the church of Christ.

 

Unity in Christ

 

By building on the foundation of a personal testimony of Jesus Christ, members of the Church in Corinth were reminded to understand the doctrine of unity in Christ, which overrides all divisions. Paul's discussion at this point is part of the answer to a larger question faced by the early Church: How does the gospel of Jesus Christ really work when applied to every nation, kindred, tongue, and people? How can one mix the great cultural extremes of Jew and Gentile or the economic and social extremes of bond and free and have the unity required by Christ?

 

Paul's answer is simple yet profound. He said: "For as the body is one, and hath many members, and all the members of that one body, being many, are one body: so also is Christ. For by one spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit. For the body is not one member, but many" (1 Corinthians 12:12-14). The body of Christ represents the Church, which is made up of many different people who have different backgrounds and different gifts but who are united with Christ through baptism and the reception of the Holy Ghost. Each member of the Church is part of the body of Christ (or part of the church of Christ) and individually represents Christ in the world.

 

Paul continues teaching by comparing members of the Church, the body of Christ, to a human physical body, with such different parts as eyes, ears, and so forth. Just as all parts of the body are necessary, so are all the members necessary and important in the church of Christ. "But now hath God set the members every one of them in the body, as it hath pleased him. . . . But now are they many members, yet but one body. And the eye cannot say unto the hand, I have no need of thee: nor again the head to the feet, I have no need of you" (1 Corinthians 12:18-21).

 

To achieve the unity in the Church that Christ requires, each member must view himself first and foremost as a true follower of Jesus Christ. Members must also recognize that every other member, regardless of background and circumstance in life, is a true follower of Christ. Whether they be Jew, Gentile, bond, free, male, female, black, or white, all are united in Christ. If members see themselves or others primarily as Jew or Gentile, or bond or free, or male or female, the Spirit is offended and unity is destroyed.

 

Paul builds on his theme of unity by teaching: "God hath tempered the body together . . . that there should be no schism in the body [church]; but that the members should have the same care one for another. And whether one member suffer, all members suffer with it; or one member be honoured, all the members rejoice with it" (1 Corinthians 12:24-26). Unity requires that members care for others, serve one another, and share the sorrows and joys of this life. The key is to achieve unity while at the same time remembering that each member is unique and has the potential to make a special contribution. Paul said it this way, "Now ye are the body of Christ, and members in particular" (1 Corinthians 12:27).

 

Spiritual Gifts: The Lord's System of Service

 

Adding to the uniqueness of each individual is the doctrine that through the administration of the Holy Ghost each member of the Church has access to differing spiritual gifts. Paul said: "Now there are diversities of gifts, but the same Spirit. And there are differences of administrations, but the same Lord. And there are diversities of operations, but it is the same God which worketh all in all. But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to every man to profit withal" (1 Corinthians 12:4-7).

 

Paul listed some of the spiritual gifts Church members may experience. "For to one is given by the Spirit the word of wisdom; to another the word of knowledge by the same Spirit; to another faith by the same Spirit; to another the gifts of healing by the same Spirit; to another the working of miracles; to another prophecy; to another discerning of spirits; to another divers kinds of tongues; to another the interpretation of tongues; but all these worketh that one and the selfsame Spirit, dividing to every man severally as he will" (1 Corinthians 12:8-11). fn

 

At first glance one might think that every person's experiencing a different spiritual gift would emphasize differences and further divide the Saints. Nevertheless, the opposite is true: spiritual gifts are given by the Lord to perfect and unite the Saints in true service one to another. Paul's words combined with the other scriptures clearly teach the uniting power of spiritual gifts.

 

According to the wisdom and pleasure of the Lord, every Church member has at least one spiritual gift, as Paul said, "dividing to every man severally as he will" (1 Corinthians 12:11). Moroni taught, "And all these gifts come by the Spirit of Christ; and they come unto every man severally, according as he will" (Moroni 10:17). No member would have all the spiritual gifts; some may have one gift, and some another; a few members may have several gifts; but among the group, all of the spiritual gifts would be present in the Church. The Lord revealed to Joseph Smith, "For all have not every gift given unto them; for there are many gifts, and to every man is given a gift by the Spirit of God" (D&C 46:11).

 

Individual Church members are given spiritual gifts for their own benefit and for the benefit of all other Church members. Paul taught, "But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to every man to profit withal . . . forasmuch as ye are zealous of spiritual gifts, seek that ye may excel to the edifying of the church" (1 Corinthians 12:7; 14:12). Moroni said that the gifts of God "are given by the manifestations of the Spirit of God unto men, to profit them" (Moroni 10:8). The Lord said, "To some is given one, and to some is given another, that all may be profited thereby" (D&C 46:12). These gifts are available to those "who love me and keep all my commandments, and him that seeketh so to do" (D&C 46:9).

 

How is it possible to benefit from the spiritual gift of another person? It could work this way. Let's say I was not given the gift of faith. My faith may be weak, and I may be struggling with things in the Church or in my life. I have the opportunity to associate with Jim, who has the special gift of strong faith. As the Lord's system works, if my faith is weak, I can associate with Jim and benefit from his gift of faith. As we continue to associate, my faith can actually increase; he can render real service to me in sharing his spiritual gift. Now think of other members with different spiritual gifts. As we associate with them, we can grow in testimony, wisdom, knowledge, and so on. In turn we share our individual spiritual gifts with others, and we are edified together. There are no unimportant gifts in the Lord's system. Just as every part of a physical body is important, so every individual Church member, with his or her special gift, is important to other members and to the welfare of the Church as a whole.

 

Each member of the Church is responsible to identify his or her spiritual gifts, develop them, and share them with others. Through this process the individual and the whole Church are united in Christ and are blessed.

 

To safeguard the purity and purpose of spiritual gifts and to ensure that gifts come from God and are used for his purposes, some Church leaders are given the gift of discernment. "And unto the bishop of the church, and unto such as God shall appoint . . . are to have it given unto them to discern all those gifts lest there shall be any among you professing and yet be not of God" (D&C 46:27). Paul is an example of how this gift works. As a Church leader responsible for the Corinthian Saints, he was able to discern and correct the false gifts and the misuse of true gifts that existed among them.

 

The prophet of God is given all of the spiritual gifts, so he can stand as an example and as a light to the Saints who will follow him. "That unto some it may be given to have all those gifts, that there may be a head, in order that every member may be profited thereby" (D&C 46:29). By looking to the prophet, individual members can see the functioning of every spiritual gift. Just as members benefit from sharing spiritual gifts with other members, they benefit from sharing the spiritual gifts of the prophet.

 

The Gifts of Tongues, Prophecy, and Charity

 

The spiritual gifts most visible to other people are the gift of speaking in tongues and the gift of prophecy. Paul discussed those two gifts, compared their importance, and outlined their proper use. Their external visibility made the proper use of these gifts very important to the functioning of the true Church. Joseph Smith said: "There are several gifts mentioned here, yet which of them all could be known by an observer . . . ? There are only two gifts that could be made visible—the gift of tongues and the gift of prophecy. . . . The greatest, the best, and the most useful gifts would be known nothing about by an observer." fn

 

In the use of these two gifts, especially speaking in tongues, the Corinthian Saints had been deceived. They seemed to think the confusion of many people speaking in some unknown tongue at the same time was the highest gift and indicated a superior level of spirituality for those involved. They were judging the worth of individuals according to their use of these more visible spiritual gifts.

 

To help the Corinthian Saints gain a proper perspective, Paul stated very strongly that the less-visible gifts of faith, hope, and charity, especially charity—which is the pure love of Christ—exceed all others. He said, "Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal. And though I have the gift of prophecy, . . . and have not charity, I am nothing" (1 Corinthians 13:1-2). Elder Bruce R. McConkie taught: "Above all the attributes of godliness and perfection, charity is the one most devoutly to be desired. Charity is more than love, far more; it is everlasting love, perfect love, the pure love of Christ which endureth forever. It is love so centered in righteousness that the possessor has no aim or desire except for the eternal welfare of his own soul and for the souls of those around him." fn

 

To further emphasize the importance of charity over that of other spiritual gifts, Paul taught that the need for the gifts of tongues and prophecy, as we know them, will end when Christ returns to the earth, but charity, the pure love of Christ, will never end. It will abide forever. He said: "Charity never faileth: but whether there be prophecies, they shall fail; whether there be tongues, they shall cease; . . . But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away. . . . And now abideth faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity" (1 Corinthians 13:8-13).

 

Elder McConkie taught, "Shall the gifts of the Spirit cease? Is there to be a day when the saints shall no longer possess the gifts of prophecy and tongues? . . . Yes, in the sense that these shall be swallowed up in something greater, and shall no longer be needed in the perfect day." fn Keeping in mind their relative importance and their temporary nature, we can see that the spiritual gifts of speaking and interpreting tongues are important when used in the right way and for the right reasons. Both gifts should be used to edify and uplift the Church.

 

The gift of tongues works in two ways. The first, to "speak with the tongues of men," is to speak to people in their own language even when the speaker does not know that language. One proper use of this gift of tongues was on the day of Pentecost. The apostles spoke and were clearly understood by many people who spoke different languages (Acts 2:1-18). The result was that those hearing the gospel understood and were edified. The second, to "speak with the tongue of angels," is for an individual to speak in a language unknown to both the speaker and the hearer. Elder McConkie suggested, "Sometimes it is the pure Adamic language which is involved." fn For this gift to be beneficial it must be communicated in an orderly way and there must be someone with the gift to interpret the unknown language. Paul said, "If any man speak in an unknown tongue, let it be by two, or at the most by three, and that by course; and let one interpret. But if there be no interpreter, let him keep silence in the church; and let him speak to himself, and to God" (1 Corinthians 14:27-28). The purpose of this gift is for the individuals possessing it to receive revelation, knowledge, prophesying, or doctrine, that all may be edified.

 

Joseph Smith warned the Saints about the gift of tongues: "Speak not in the gift of tongues without understanding it, or without interpretation. The devil can speak in tongues; the adversary will come with his work; he can tempt all classes; can speak in English or Dutch. Let no one speak in tongues unless he interpret, except by the consent of the one who is placed to preside; then he may discern or interpret, or another may." fn The Prophet also said: "Be not so curious about tongues, do not speak in tongues except there be an interpreter present; the ultimate design of tongues is to speak to foreigners. . . . The gifts of God are all useful in their place, but when they are applied to that which God does not intend, they prove an injury, a snare and a curse instead of a blessing." fn

 

Paul taught the Corinthians that their false understanding and application of the gift of tongues would not help the Church or those investigating the Church: "For he that speaketh in an unknown tongue speaketh not unto men, but unto God: for no man understandeth him; . . . If therefore the whole church be come together into one place, and all speak with tongues, and there come in those that are unlearned, or unbelievers, will they not say that ye are mad?" (1 Corinthians 14:2, 23). In the Lord's church, all speaking and teaching should be understandable and done in proper order to edify the individual and the Church. To emphasize this point Paul said, "I thank my God, I speak with tongues more than ye all: yet in the church I had rather speak five words with my understanding, that by my voice I might teach others also, than ten thousand words in an unknown tongue" (1 Corinthians 14:18-19).

 

In a hierarchy of spiritual gifts, the gift of prophecy is greater than the gift of tongues. Elder Bruce R. McConkie said: "Prophecy is revelation; it is testimony; it is Spirit speaking to spirit; it is knowing by revelation that Jesus is the Lord, that salvation is in Christ, that he has redeemed us by his blood. Prophecy is walking in paths of truth and righteousness; it is living and doing the will of Him whose we are. . . . Prophecy is for all: men, women, and children, every member of the true Church; and those who have the testimony of Jesus have the spirit of prophecy." fn Paul said, "Desire spiritual gifts, but rather that ye may prophesy. . . . He that prophesieth speaketh unto men to edification, and exhortation, and comfort. . . . He that prophesieth edifieth the church. . . . Wherefore, brethren, covet [be eager, zealous] to prophesy, and forbid not to speak with tongues" (1 Corinthians 14:1, 4, 39).

 

Even with the special gift of prophecy it is important to avoid confusion and disorder in the Church. Paul instructs the Corinthian Saints that when the prophets (those who have the testimony of Jesus) speak, others should listen and give their full attention, so that by partaking of the same Spirit as the speaker all may be edified together: "Let the prophets speak two or three, and let the other judge . . . For ye may all prophesy one by one, that all may learn, and all may be comforted. . . . For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints. . . . Let all things be done decently and in order" (1 Corinthians 14:29, 31, 33, 40). When things are done according to the will of the Lord and when the spirit is right, "he that preacheth and he that receiveth, understand one another, and both are edified and rejoice together" (D&C 50:22).

 

Summary

 

The companionship of the Holy Ghost brings a true testimony of Jesus Christ, unity in Christ, and access to spiritual gifts. Spiritual gifts come from God, through the Holy Ghost, and are one sign of the true Church in every age. Christ taught the Nephites, "And if it so be that the church is built upon my gospel then will the Father show forth his own works in it" (3 Nephi 27:10). Spiritual gifts are one of the manifestations of the works of the Father. Elder Bruce R. McConkie taught: "Whence come spiritual gifts? Paul says they come from the Spirit, meaning the Holy Ghost. The latter-day revelation on spiritual gifts says they come from God, meaning the Father. Moroni calls them the gifts of God, but says they come from Christ and also that they come by the Spirit of Christ, meaning the light of Christ which proceedeth forth from the presence of God to fill the immensity of space.

 

"And all of these inspired declarations are true; each is in perfect harmony with all of the others. Certainly they are the gifts of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost . . . which exemplifies the perfect unity and oneness of the members of the Godhead." fn

 

Members of the Church must seek spiritual gifts. The Lord will not force them upon an individual, but they are available to all who make the effort to obtain them. One way a person demonstrates love for the Lord is by seeking and sharing spiritual gifts. President David O. McKay said: "The only thing which places man above the beasts of the field is his possession of spiritual gifts. Man's earthly existence is but a test as to whether he will concentrate his efforts, his mind, his soul upon things which contribute to the comfort and gratification of his physical instincts and passions, or whether he will make as his life's end and purpose the acquisition of spiritual qualities." fn Elder McConkie taught, "By the grace of God—following devotion, faith, and obedience on man's part—certain special spiritual blessings called gifts of the Spirit are bestowed upon men. Their receipt is always predicated upon obedience to law, but because they are freely available to all the obedient, they are called gifts. They are signs and miracles reserved for the faithful and for none else. . . . Their purpose is to enlighten, encourage, and edify the faithful so that they will inherit peace in this life and be guided toward eternal life in the world to come." fn Whenever the gospel and the priesthood are on the earth these gifts will be available, through the Holy Ghost, to members of the Church who seek them. One sign of apostasy for individuals and for the Church is the absence of spiritual gifts.

 

There are many different gifts, including healing, tongues, faith, prophecy, and so forth. The purpose of each gift is to encourage, edify, unite, and help perfect the individual and, in turn, to bless other members of the Church. Every member has at least one gift; some may have several; but only the prophet has them all. Individuals have the responsibility to identify, develop, and share their gifts with others. In sharing their gifts, members render real service to others, and each member with his or her special gift is an important part of the Church.

 

Spiritual gifts can be misused, their purpose can be misunderstood, and there are even false gifts that do not come from the Lord. To protect Church members from these deceptions, the Lord gives Church leaders the gift of discernment. Another sure protection for Church members is a personal relationship with Heavenly Father, a firm testimony of Christ, and the companionship of the Holy Ghost.

 

There should be order and peace in the use of spiritual gifts, especially such gifts as prophecy and speaking in tongues, which are outwardly visible. To Paul the gift of charity, the pure love of Christ, is the ultimate, lasting gift. After the coming of Christ, most gifts will become part of the outpouring of the Lord's Spirit, but the gift of charity, which never faileth, will endure forever.

 

When the gifts of the Spirit are used properly and in unity with the will of the Lord, all will understand, rejoice, and be edified together.

 

Notes

 

1. Richard Lloyd Anderson, Understanding Paul (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1983), 93-94.

 

2. Joseph Smith, Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, sel. Joseph Fielding Smith (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1938), 223.

 

3. In other places and at other times Moroni and Joseph Smith listed the same spiritual gifts, with some variations.

 

4. Smith, Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, 246.

 

5. Bruce R. McConkie, Doctrinal New Testament Commentary, 3 vols. (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1965-73), 2:378.

 

6. Ibid., 2:380.

 

7. Ibid., 2:383.

 

8. Smith, Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, 162.

 

9. Ibid., 247-48.

 

10. McConkie, Doctrinal New Testament Commentary, 2:386-87.

 

11. Ibid., 2:371.

 

12. David O. McKay, in Conference Report, Oct. 1951, 9.

 

13. Bruce R. McConkie, Mormon Doctrine, 2d ed. (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1966), 314.

 

 

(The Apostle Paul, His Life and His Testimony: The 23d Annual Sidney B. Sperry Symposium [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1994], 161.)

They loved the physical life and hated the spiritual life.  It was an anything goes environment.

There were 2 other letters written before this letter.  This is actually 2nd Corinthians.

(1 Corinthians 1:10-12.) – Divisions in the ward, class distinctions

 

10 Now I beseech you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye all speak the same thing, and that there be no divisions among you; but that ye be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment.

 

11 For it hath been declared unto me of you, my brethren, by them which are of the house of Chloe, that there are contentions among you.

 

12 Now this I say, that every one of you saith, I am of Paul; and I of Apollos; and I of Cephas; and I of Christ.

 

(1 Corinthians 2:1-7.) – Taught by the Spirit (testimony and witness) not by intellect.  Not wanting to get too deep with them, he would lose them.

 

1 And I, brethren, when I came to you, came not with excellency of speech or of wisdom, declaring unto you the testimony of God.

 

2 For I determined not to know any thing among you, save Jesus Christ, and him crucified.

 

3 And I was with you in weakness, and in fear, and in much trembling.

 

4 And my speech and my preaching was not with enticing words of man's wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power:

 

5 That your faith should not stand in the wisdom of men, but in the power of God.

 

6 Howbeit we speak wisdom among them that are perfect: yet not the wisdom of this world, nor of the princes of this world, that come to nought:

 

7 But we speak the wisdom of God in a mystery, even the hidden wisdom, which God ordained before the world unto our glory:

 

The ward was divided by members following different teachers and not uniting, of course this wasn’t the intention of those who visited Corinth

 

(1 Corinthians 9:5.)

 

5 Have we not power to lead about a sister, a wife, as well as other apostles, and as the brethren of the Lord, and Cephas?

 

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 76:99-101) – Whatever was going on in Corinth was telestial in nature and not good for the church.

99 For these are they who are of Paul, and of Apollos, and of Cephas.

100 These are they who say they are some of one and some of another—some of Christ and some of John, and some of Moses, and some of Elias, and some of Esaias, and some of Isaiah, and some of Enoch;

 

101 But received not the gospel, neither the testimony of Jesus, neither the prophets, neither the everlasting covenant.

 

The culture was the main problem in the ward; they went out on the limb with doctrinal issues.

(JST 1 Corinthians 6:12.) – We are in Christ’s family and now we do His will not our own.

 

12 All these things are not lawful unto me, and all these things are not expedient. All things are not lawful for me, therefore I will not be brought under the power of any.

 

13 Meats for the belly, and the belly for meats; but God shall destroy both it and them. Now the body is not for fornication, but for the Lord; and the Lord for the body.

 

14 And God hath both raised up the Lord, and will also raise up us by his own power.

 

15 Know ye not that your bodies are the members of Christ? shall I then take the members of Christ, and make them the members of a harlot? God forbid

 

Prostitution was a great evil in Corinth, eating idol sacrifices was also wrong; it set a poor example to other members, not understanding your intentions.  What god are you worshipping?  Your knowledge may be destructive to the weak.

(1 Corinthians 8:4-13.)

 

4 As concerning therefore the eating of those things that are offered in sacrifice unto idols, we know that an idol is nothing in the world, and that there is none other God but one.

 

5 For though there be that are called gods, whether in heaven or in earth, (as there be gods many, and lords many,)

 

6 But to us there is but one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we in him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we by him.

 

7 Howbeit there is not in every man that knowledge: for some with conscience of the idol unto this hour eat it as a thing offered unto an idol; and their conscience being weak is defiled.

 

8 But meat commendeth us not to God: for neither, if we eat, are we the better; neither, if we eat not, are we the worse.

 

9 But take heed lest by any means this liberty of yours become a stumblingblock to them that are weak.

 

10 For if any man see thee which hast knowledge sit at meat in the idol's temple, shall not the conscience of him which is weak be emboldened to eat those things which are offered to idols;

 

11 And through thy knowledge shall the weak brother perish, for whom Christ died?

 

12 But when ye sin so against the brethren, and wound their weak conscience, ye sin against Christ.

 

13 Wherefore, if meat make my brother to offend, I will eat no flesh while the world standeth, lest I make my brother to offend.

 

Sacrament meetings were held in rich member’s homes, but the house was divided where the rich ate in one room and the poor in another.  The rich had a huge meal and lots of wine etc, while the poor didn’t enjoy such amenities.  It defeated the whole purpose of the Sacrament. 

(1 Corinthians 11:18-22.) – The problem of culture in the Sacrament

 

18 For first of all, when ye come together in the church, I hear that there be divisions among you; and I partly believe it.

 

19 For there must be also heresies among you, that they which are approved may be made manifest among you.

 

20 When ye come together therefore into one place, this is not to eat the Lord's supper.

 

21 For in eating every one taketh before other his own supper: and one is hungry, and another is drunken.

 

22 What? have ye not houses to eat and to drink in? or despise ye the church of God, and shame them that have not? What shall I say to you? shall I praise you in this? I praise you not.

 

 

"IS CHRIST DIVIDED?"

 

UNITY OF THE SAINTS THROUGH CHARITY

 

(1, 2 Corinthians)

 

DAVID R. SEELY

 

Paul wrote his epistles to the Corinthians (1 and 2 Corinthians) from Ephesus and Macedonia in the spring and fall of the year A.D. 57, during his third mission to the Gentiles. fn He addressed them to the members of the church at Corinth, which Paul had helped to found during his first mission in A.D. 50, and they represent two of the earliest (preceded only perhaps by the epistles to the Thessalonians), longest, and most doctrinally replete of the Pauline epistles. Paul wrote the letter found in 1 Corinthians to address the serious dissensions and immorality that had arisen in his absence among the saints there, and to answer some of their questions about church doctrine and practice. Shortly thereafter he wrote the letter found in 2 Corinthians, expressing his joy in hearing that many of the saints had repented and continuing his plea for repentance directed to those who had not.

 

Historical Background

 

The ancient Greek city-state of Corinth was strategically located in the center of the isthmus joining northern Greece to the Peloponnesus on the south, and controlled the port to the west on the Corinthian Gulf and the port to the east on the Saronic Gulf. Because of its location, it was inseparably connected with the sea and derived its wealth primarily from shipping and trade. The isthmus was so narrow that small ships or cargoes headed west were often unloaded and dragged across the isthmus to continue their journey, thus avoiding the long journey around the Peloponnesus. Corinth heroically stood alongside her sister states of Athens and Sparta against the invasion from the east in the Persian Wars (490-478 B.C.); opposed the ensuing Athenian imperialism that resulted in the Peloponnesian War (431-404 B.C.); and, once again allied with her Greek sister city-states against the Spartan hegemony in the Corinthian War (395-387 B.C.). It is not surprising that eventually Corinth became the leader of the Achaian Confederacy, which came into conflict in the second century B.C. with the expanding military might of Rome. As a result of Roman supremacy and of Corinth's leading role in opposition, the Greek city was captured and burned by Rome in 146 B.C. and its citizens either killed or sold into slavery.

 

Therefore the Corinth of Paul's time was not the ancient Greek city but rather a Roman colony founded by decree of Julius Caesar in 44 B.C. on the ancient site, which had lain virtually desolate for more than a century. Its new population initially consisted of freedmen from Italy who were soon joined by Greeks and other foreigners, including many Jews, from the East. As in the past, Corinth quickly became an important center of industry and commerce, a center that in A.D. 27 became the capital of the Roman province of Achaia. Like any port city in ancient or modern times, Corinth at the time of Paul had the reputation of being cosmopolitan, worldly, and promiscuous—full of both philosophies and practices from every corner of the world. In fact, in Koine Greek "the verb korinthiazein, 'to live like a Corinthian' came to mean 'to live a dissolute life.'" fn

 

Chapter 18 of the book of Acts narrates Paul's founding of the first Christian community in Corinth. In the year A.D. 50, Paul left Athens, near the end of his missionary journey, and traveled to Corinth, where he stayed for a year and a half. (Acts 18:11.) fn At Corinth he met two Jewish converts, Aquila and his wife, Priscilla, who had recently been forced to leave Rome. fn Because they were tentmakers like himself, Paul moved in with them and presumably worked with them in their business while he pursued his missionary efforts there. While Acts 18:4 records that as he taught in the synagogue he "persuaded the Jews and the Greeks," it also implies that his message was more readily accepted by the Gentiles. (Acts 18:5-8.) fn Nevertheless, the mixture of Jews and Gentiles may have been a factor in the contentions that soon arose within the church at Corinth. After Silas and Timothy came from Macedonia, Paul moved in with a Gentile named Justus, and many Corinthians believed in his words and were baptized, including Crispus, the "chief ruler of the synagogue." (18:8.)

 

The social conditions at Corinth were volatile even during Paul's ministry there, and we can only imagine some of the circumstances faced by the early saints in the fledgling church after he left. When Gallio was made "deputy of Achaia" (A.D. 51-52), many of the Corinthian Jews, enraged at Paul for "persuad[ing] men to worship God contrary to the law" (18:13), took him before Gallio for judgment. Gallio refused to get involved and sent the people away, implying that it was not his duty to get involved in a religious squabble. (18:14-16.) Shortly thereafter Paul left with Priscilla and Aquila and went to Ephesus, then continued alone to Antioch and eventually Jerusalem. (18:21.) While he was in Jerusalem, "a certain Jew named Apollos, born at Alexandria, an eloquent man, and mighty in the scriptures, came to Ephesus." (18:24.) After Aquila and Priscilla had "expounded unto him the way of God more perfectly" (18:26), Apollos was sent to Corinth with recommendations from "the brethren . . . exhorting the disciples there to receive him, . . . for he mightily convinced the Jews, and that publickly, shewing by the scriptures that Jesus was Christ" (18:27-28).

 

Within a relatively short time, news came to Paul of moral laxity among the Corinthian saints. He refers in 1 Corinthians 5:9 to a letter, no longer extant, that he had written previously advising them "not to company with fornicators." Further disturbing news of dissension among the saints came by way of messengers from the house of Chloe (1 Cor. 1:11) and a later delegation (1 Cor. 16:17), as well as by way of a letter from the church at Corinth asking his counsel on several of the divisive issues involved (1 Cor. 7:1). These reports provided the impetus for the writing of 1 Corinthians in which Paul addressed the issue of dissension as well as answered the doctrinal questions. He wrote 1 Corinthians in the early summer of A.D. 57, shortly before Pentecost (1 Cor. 16:8); and as a follow-up to this letter, he sent Timothy to see that his counsel was heeded and that the situation in Corinth improved (1 Cor. 16:10-11). The evidence in 2 Corinthians suggests, however, that things got worse before they got better. There are allusions in 2 Corinthians (2:1; 12:14; and 13:1-2) to a "second visit" by Paul, calling the members of the church to repentance, and to a harsh letter (possibly a reference to 1 Corinthians) that finally brought some results. Probably in the fall of A.D. 57, Paul got word that many at Corinth, humbled by his concern through his letters, had repented. He responded by writing the letter preserved in 2 Corinthians to further express his love for the Corinthian saints, his joy that many had responded to his rebuke, and his continued concern for those who still remained rebellious.

 

We have only a portion of one side of the correspondence between Paul and the saints at Corinth. But from these two letters we can learn much about the challenges faced by the small community of early saints as they sought to learn their identity as Christians in the most worldly of worlds at Corinth. It is not surprising that these letters contain much of value for saints in the latter days as well: faced with many of the same challenges, learning to accept and to love one another and seeking to come out from Babylon to build up Zion.

 

1 Corinthians: Structure and Contents

 

An outline of the contents of 1 Corinthians demonstrates that what at first glance may appear to be a random collection of Paul's teachings is really a carefully constructed letter of four parts:

 

I. 1:1-9: Introduction

 

A. Salutation (1:1-3)

 

B. Thanksgiving/blessing (1:4-9)

 

II. Chapters 1 to 6: Paul's response to reports from the house of Chloe

 

A. Divisions in the church and a plea for unity

 

(1:10-4:21)

 

1. Dissensions at Corinth (1:10-17)

 

2. The wisdom of the world and of the spirit

 

(1:18-2:16)

 

3. Teachers (3:1-4:21)

 

B. Immorality (chs. 5-6)

 

1. Fellowship of sinners (ch. 5)

 

2. Lawsuits and courts (6:1-8)

 

3. Sexual laxity (6:9-20)

 

III. Chapters 7 to 15: Paul's response to questions posed by the church at Corinth

 

A. Marriage (ch. 7)

 

B. Idol sacrifices (8:1-11:1)

 

C. Divine worship and the new covenant (11:2-15:58)

 

1. Women and worship (11:2-16)

 

2. The Lord's Supper (11:17-34)

 

3. Spiritual gifts (ch. 12-14)

 

a. Charity (ch. 13)

 

b. Speaking in tongues (ch. 14)

 

4. Resurrection (ch. 15)

 

IV. Chapter 16: Conclusion

 

A. Exhortations (16:1-18)

 

B. Salutation (16:19-24)

 

The first part of the letter is a short formal introduction (1:1-9), followed by the body of the letter. The body of the letter is evenly divided between Paul's addressing the reports he had received from people in the house of Chloe of dissension and immorality that had crept into the church at Corinth (1:10-6:20), and his careful response to a series of questions written to him by the church (7:1) on subjects that had contributed to the contention in the church, such as marriage, idol sacrifices, the proper place of spiritual gifts, and the resurrection (chs. 7-15). The letter then ends with a formal conclusion. This study will systematically discuss each major section of the epistle, focusing on one of the major themes found throughout—unity among the saints.

 

I. Introduction: Salutation and Thanksgiving

 

Paul begins the first epistle to the Corinthians, just as he begins his other letters, with an introduction consisting of a salutation and a blessing (1:1-3) and a formal statement of thanksgiving (1:4-9). The salutation identifies Paul as the sender of the letter, writing in the official capacity of "an apostle of Jesus Christ through the will of God," along with Sosthenes, a fellow saint whom he identifies as "our brother." The letter is addressed to the members of the church at Corinth "that are sanctified in Christ Jesus." (1:2) The salutation also contains the blessing or benediction "Grace [charis] be unto you, and peace, from God our Father, and from the Lord Jesus Christ." (1:3.) This formulaic blessing is a unique Christian innovation in which Paul appears to have combined a modified form of the common Greek greeting chairein with the common Hebrew greeting shalom. Combining a Greek and a Hebrew greeting may have been a deliberate attempt to reflect the new order of Christian society, which was also a combination of Gentiles and Jews, and the words grace and peace that come from "God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ" adequately summarize the gospel—the "good news"—of the atonement of the Lord Jesus Christ. fn

 

Paul begins his thanksgiving by expressing gratitude for the grace of God that is given to the saints in Corinth by Jesus Christ. While gratefully acknowledging grace, a silent reference to the lack of harmony in Corinth and a foreshadowing of the rebuke that is to follow directly, is the conspicuous absence of any mention of its counterpart—peace. Paul then concentrates on the positive fruits of this grace that have been realized among the saints in Corinth—that they have been enriched in "all utterance, and in all knowledge" as well as spiritual gifts. (1:5, 7.) But once again the deafening silence regarding the fruits of faith, love, and righteousness lays the foundation for the body of the letter, which will deal with all of these expected fruits of the gospel. Ending on an optimistic note, he expresses his wish that in the end the saints may be able to stand "blameless in the day of our Lord Jesus Christ" (1:8), silently implying that repentance will be necessary. The final verse of thanksgiving (1:9) forms a transition from the introduction to Paul's first concern—the lack of unity among the saints in Corinth. He carefully sets the stage for his appeal for love and unity, noting that it is God who has called them "into fellowship of his Son Jesus Christ our Lord."

 

II. Paul's Response to Reports from the House of Chloe

 

Divisions in the Church and a Plea for Unity

 

Paul immediately addresses one of the disturbing developments at Corinth he has been advised of and makes his plea: "Now I beseech you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ . . . that there be no divisions among you." (1:10.) He has carefully prepared the rhetoric of his message. In verse 1 he indicates the official nature of this letter by referring to his apostolic calling and stewardship over the church in Corinth. At the same time he tempers the harsh nature of his rebuke throughout the letter with the constant use of the term brethren, emphasizing the intimate relationship enjoyed as members of the church and the common fellowship and commitment they enjoy through Jesus Christ.

 

Apparently the contentions and divisions among the members of the church had been manifested by the division into groups, each proclaiming their allegiance to Paul, Apollos, or Cephas. Paul's response to this situation is a series of rhetorical questions: "Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?" (1:13.) Once again Paul has prepared the rhetoric for his argument to follow, mentioning the name of Jesus Christ—who should be the sole focal point of allegiance—nine times in verses 1 through 9 before he explicitly reveals the subject of the letter in verse 10. At the same time he has carefully pointed out, as a model of oneness, the united efforts of God the Father and his Son Jesus Christ in administrating the gospel. (1:1, 3, 4, 9.)

 

It has been suggested that the factionalism in the church at Corinth may have been due in part to a division between the Greek (Gentile) and the Jewish members—the Greeks aligning themselves with Apollos, the charismatic and eloquent orator from Alexandria, and the Jews, originally from Syro-Palestine, identifying themselves with Cephas, the Apostle Peter. (John 1:42.) fn At the same time, those who had been greatly influenced by Paul during his ministry at Corinth cited him as their champion. Ironically, members of one group seem to have distinguished themselves by identifying their faction as "of Christ." Paul responds to the division between the Jews and the Greeks, making the point that "the preaching of the cross" which is the "wisdom of God" is foolishness to all of the wise men of the world—both Jew and Greek. (1:18-21.)

 

Paul describes the doctrine of "Christ crucified" as a "stumblingblock" to the Jews, who "require a sign" (1:22-23), perhaps a reference to the widespread Jewish expectation of a powerful Messiah who, rather than dying the death of a criminal, was to have brought them mighty acts of political deliverance. To the Greeks who seek wisdom, the crucified Christ is "foolishness." (1:22-23.) But to those who are "called" (become members of the church), "both Jews and Greeks," Christ is the "power of God, and the wisdom of God." (1:24.) Just as there are not many "wise men after the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble" found in the congregation at Corinth (1:26), so God has chosen everywhere "the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and . . . the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty" (1:27).

 

Paul's discussion about the wisdom of the world and the wisdom of the Spirit (1:18-2:16) is directed at the problem of dissension in the church. For members of the church to claim their allegiance to the wisdom of the Jews or Greeks, or to Apollos, Cephas, or even Paul, is to demonstrate a basic misunderstanding of the gospel message of Christ crucified, which transcends all worldly wisdom. Perhaps directing his remarks to those who claimed to be "of Paul," he points out that when he came, he purposely avoided preaching with "enticing words of man's wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power: that [one's] faith should not stand in the wisdom of men, but in the power of God." (2:4-5.) True conversion, he explains, comes when the natural man—who "receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him" (2:14)—is changed by the power of the Holy Ghost into a spiritual man, who is able to receive "the spirit which is of God," that he "might know the things that are freely given" to him by God (2:12).

 

The contention manifested at Corinth is a sure sign that the conversion process is not complete or is in a state of disintegration. In chapter 3 Paul describes the members of the church at Corinth as being in the infant stages of conversion—as "babes in Christ" who are "yet carnal: for . . . there is among [them] envying, and strife, and divisions." (3:1-3.) For this reason they must be fed with milk and not meat. (3:2.) Referring to the factionalism in the church, Paul proceeds to teach the proper place of teachers and other of the Lord's representatives on earth. Using a metaphor of agriculture, he explains: "I have planted, Apollos watered; but God gave the increase. So then neither is he that planteth any thing, neither he that watereth; but God that giveth the increase. Now he that planteth and he that watereth are one: and every man shall receive his own reward according to his own labour. For we are labourers together with God: ye are God's husbandry." (3:6-9.) He further compares the church to a building, the laborers as the builders, and the foundation as Jesus Christ. (3:9-15.) While each person's contribution to the building will be judged whether it be good or bad, the foundation—Christ—always remains secure, once again reminding the saints that true unity is achieved not by loyalty to each other but through the common bond of allegiance to God.

 

Paul concludes his teaching about the role of teachers with a summary of the whole principle: "Therefore let no man glory in men. For all things are yours; whether Paul, or Apollos, or Cephas, or the world, or life, or death, or things present, or things to come; all are yours; and ye are Christ's; and Christ is God's." (3:21-23.)

 

Immorality among the Saints

 

In chapters 5 and 6, Paul deals with the report of immorality among the saints in Corinth. He first turns to the specific charge of one who married his father's wife (stepmother). While in and of itself this constituted, according to the Mosaic law (Lev. 18:8; 20:11) and Roman law, the serious transgression of incest, Paul is first concerned with the fact that the members of the church have accepted such a transgressor. He notes that they are "puffed up" with pride in their sympathetic acceptance of this relationship when they should have "rather mourned" and cast such a transgressor out of their midst. (5:1-5.) Brotherhood and fellowship, so important to the unity of the saints, does not, however, extend to the casual acceptance of serious sin. He tells the Corinthian saints, "your glorying is not good." (5:6.)

 

Reversing the imagery of the well-known saying of Jesus (Matt. 13:33) comparing the kingdom of God, although small, to leaven that could influence the whole world for good, Paul compares the leaven to the one guilty of serious transgression who can also have a great influence on the whole: "Know ye not that a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump? Purge out therefore the old leaven, that ye may be a new lump, as ye are unleavened." (5:6-7.) In cases of serious sin, judgment is necessary and some may need to be cast out in order not to compromise the whole church.

 

At the same time that some saints are overly tolerant of those who deserve ecclesiastical discipline, others are taking their brothers to court to be judged by the unbelievers. (6:1-8.) Paul tells them that most of these disputes are over issues so trivial that they should be overlooked, and in the more serious cases they should be solved within the jurisdiction of the church. Finally he exhorts the Corinthians to refrain from any sexual immorality (6:9-20), because such sin defiles the body, which is the "temple of the Holy Ghost" (6:19).

 

III. Paul's Response to Questions Posed by the Corinthians

 

The introductory verses in chapters 7, 8, and 12 indicate that Paul's teachings in chapters 7 through 15 are responses to questions posed by the Corinthians in a previous letter concerning marriage (7); idol sacrifices (8-11:1); proper worship—including questions about the place of women, the administration of the sacrament and spiritual gifts (11:2-14:40); and the resurrection (15). Apparently many of these issues had contributed to the contention among the saints.

 

Questions on Marriage

 

The Joseph Smith Translation is an invaluable aid in helping us to understand the perplexing passage contained in chapter 7. On the surface it appears that Paul is telling the Corinthians that celibacy is preferable to marriage. The Joseph Smith Translation changes the first verse—"It is good for a man not to touch a woman"—into a statement made in the letter from the Corinthians rather than a statement of Paul, so that verses 2 through 5 are Paul's response to this statement. This simple clarification radically changes the tone of Paul's response, from the implication that the institution of marriage is a concession made to mortals in order to avoid immorality, to a defense of marriage as an essential part of the gospel, one in which sexual relations are essential.

 

Because Paul claims to have fulfilled all of the religious requirements of Jewish law (Philip. 3:6; Gal. 1:14), which included marriage, many scholars accept the fact that Paul must have been married at some point in his life. fn In light of this fact, Paul's apparently positive attitude toward celibacy and his disparagement of marriage in this passage seem odd. Paul himself says that these instructions are given not as doctrine ("commandment of the Lord") but as his own personal opinion (1 Cor. 7:25), and that his approval of the unmarried state is a temporary injunction "good for the present distress" (7:26). Many interpret this "distress" (Gr. anagke) to be reference to Paul's belief that the end of the world and the Second Coming were imminent and therefore the commandment of marriage was suspended for a time. This assumption, however, contradicts other statements made by Paul himself (i.e., 2 Thes. 2) where it is clear that he understood that the apostasy and restoration (and therefore a considerable period of time) must precede the return of the Savior. fn

 

The Joseph Smith Translation confirms that indeed this counsel is a temporary injunction and explains that it is given specifically to those who are involved in missionary work, rendering 1 Corinthians 7:29: "But I speak unto you who are called unto the ministry. For this I say, brethren, the time that remaineth is but short, that ye shall be sent forth unto the ministry. Even they who have wives, shall be as though they had none; for ye are called and chosen to do the Lord's work."

 

Sacrifice to Idols

 

The second question that Paul addresses is whether it is permissible for the saints to eat meat that had been sacrificed to idols. This was a problem commonly faced by Christians in many Hellenistic and Roman cities. Much of the meat sold in the markets had originally been sacrificial offerings in the local temples. Partially burned as offerings to the idols of the pagan deities, the remainder of the meat belonged to the priests, who sold and distributed it to the butchers in the area. Furthermore, festive meals held in the homes of pagans, often social events to which they would invite their Christian neighbors, consisted of sacrificial animals that were dedicated to the gods on those occasions.

 

In chapters 8 through 11:1, Paul discusses the complexities of this difficult issue and gives counsel. In chapter 8 he begins his argument, identifying the relevant principles. First he recognizes that many of the saints have the knowledge that there is only one God and that "an idol is nothing in the world" (8:4-6), and because of this knowledge they are not bothered by eating idol sacrifices. This knowledge, however, "puffeth up" and makes those who are not bothered proud. (8:1.) On the other hand, some saints do not enjoy this knowledge, and when they eat meat offered to idols, "their conscience being weak is defiled." (8:7.) Under the circumstances Paul reminds them that "charity edifieth." (8:1.) It is true that many have the knowledge that eating such meat neither commends nor condemns (8:8), but charity dictates that all members of the church be sensitive to those with less understanding, lest eating meat sacrificed to idols becomes "a stumblingblock to them that are weak" (8:9). The first priority is unity, and while the eating of idol sacrifice may be in and of itself of no import, if it affects the fellowship of the saints it is an important issue. Paul reminds the Corinthians, who would eat such meat in the pride of their knowledge, "When ye sin so against the brethren, and wound their weak conscience, ye sin against Christ." (8:12.)

 

Divine Worship and the New Covenant

 

Paul's teachings throughout the New Testament are enriched by frequent references to the Old Testament. In his letters he introduces direct quotations from scripture by the phrase "for it is written" (see, for example, the citation of Isa. 29:14 in 1 Cor. 1:19 and Isa. 64:4 in 2:9). At other times he makes general reference to Old Testament history and imagery to illustrate and more effectively communicate a point. When he makes his plea to the Corinthians to remain pure from the impure "leaven" of fornicators, he compares it to the fastidious purging of leaven necessary for the feast of Unleavened Bread associated with Passover. From a concrete example well understood from the law of Moses, he teaches the spiritual principle that the saints should "keep the feast, not with old leaven, neither with the leaven of malice and wickedness; but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth." (1 Cor. 5:7-8.)

 

In his appeal for chastity Paul declares, "Your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own." (6:19.) Giving the reason that the body belongs in part to deity, he cites the Old Testament imagery of God redeeming Israel from slavery by means of the miraculous deliverance at the Red Sea and quotes Exodus 15:16: "For ye are bought with a price." (1 Cor. 6:20.) The image, well known in Israel, is that they were slaves ransomed ("redeemed") from their owners in Egypt by a mighty act of divine intervention and thus became the property of their new master—the Lord God of Israel. fn

 

In chapter 10 Paul builds on this image of Israel's miraculous preservation in the wilderness and compares the present saints with their physical, if not spiritual (in the case of the Gentiles), forefathers. They, just as their forefathers, had been baptized, had "passed through the sea," and had eaten the spiritual meat and drink from the Rock that guided them in the wilderness. (10:1-4.) The author of the old covenant as well as the new is the same—Jesus Christ. Through this comparison, Paul shows the miracles in the desert to be a type of the new covenant instituted by Jesus, made efficacious through baptism and the partaking of the spiritual meat and drink of the sacrament. At the same time, the sacred history of the Old Testament is a foreshadowing of the mighty act of redemption, also a mighty act of divine intervention, accomplished by the Atonement. The point of Paul's masterful sermon is to remind the Corinthians of the darker side of the story of the children of Israel in the wilderness—that they, just as the covenant people of old, were capable of murmuring, idolatry, fornication, and blasphemy. (10:5-12.)

 

In chapters 12 through 14, Paul turns to the problem of spiritual gifts that had also apparently become a source of contention in the congregation at Corinth. He explains that while unity in the church depends on oneness of purpose, it does not dictate a uniformity of the different manifestations of the Spirit among the individual members. There is a diversity of gifts—wisdom, knowledge, faith, healing, working of miracles, prophecy, discerning of spirits, gift of tongues—all manifestations of the same Spirit. (12:4-10.) Paul illustrates his point with the apt metaphor of the body. Just as there are different offices and callings in the church (12:28-30), so the various spiritual gifts are given to different individuals and must function together like the different members of the human body. Every part of the body is necessary for its proper function, and no part can claim independence from any other part. While this metaphor delineates the proper function of spiritual gifts and offices in the church, at the same time it speaks to the larger issue of unity in the church. This oneness is characterized by a recognition of the importance of each individual as well as a spirit of mutual empathy that makes the saints as one—suffering and rejoicing with the fortunes of each member of the "body of Christ." (1 Cor. 12:27.) In short, unity is achieved only through love. Joseph Smith recognized this and quoted, in part, Paul's metaphor of the body in an editorial appearing in the April 2, 1842, issue of the Times and Seasons encouraging the Saints in their efforts to build the Nauvoo Temple:

 

The advancement of the cause of God and the building up of Zion is as much one man's business as another's. The only difference is, that one is called to fulfill one duty, and another another duty; "but if one member suffers, all the members suffer with it, and if one member is honored all the rest rejoice with it, and the eye cannot say to the ear, I have no need of thee, nor the head to the foot, I have no need of thee;" [1 Cor. 12:25-26] party feelings, separate interests, exclusive designs should be lost sight of in the one common cause, in the interest of the whole. fn

 

The crowning gift of the Spirit is charity—"the pure love of Christ" (Moro. 7:47)—which every Saint should seek (1 Cor. 14:1), for without love one is "as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal" (13:1). fn Paul's discourse on love has been immortalized in the traditional language of the King James Version and incorporated in part into the thirteenth Article of Faith. Echoing the themes found throughout the letter, Paul identifies charity as that which "rejoiceth not in iniquity, but rejoiceth in the truth; beareth all things, believeth all things, hopeth all things, endureth all things." (13:6-7.) Of all of the enduring gifts of God—faith, hope, and charity—"the greatest of these is charity." (13:13.) Charity is the answer to many of the problems among the saints in Corinth and is ultimately the most important ingredient in the unity of the church.

 

Resurrection in 1 Corinthians

 

The final problem that Paul addresses in 1 Corinthians is resurrection. In response to those who apparently doubt the resurrection of the dead (15:12), he presents to the Corinthians in chapter 15 one of the most explicit and complete doctrinal expositions of resurrection found anywhere in the New Testament. He reaffirms the historical reality of Christ's crucifixion and resurrection and cites the witnesses of the scriptures: Peter, the Twelve, and the five hundred. (15:3-7.) Last of all he adds his own personal witness, as the "least of the apostles" (15:8-9), that He who once was dead lives. The victory over death is universal, "for as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive." (15:22.) But while resurrection will be enjoyed by all, Paul reminds the Corinthians that in the hereafter there are three glories to be gained (15:40-41), according to one's performance in mortality. The doctrine of resurrection and judgment reminds the saints that the relevance of Paul's letter transcends the cause of local tranquillity and extends to the eternities.

 

IV. Conclusion: Exhortations and Salutation

 

In conclusion, Paul mentions the collection for the poor saints in Palestine according to the request of the Jerusalem council. (Acts 11:29.) He then outlines his travel plans to pass through Macedonia and come to Corinth in the near future and adds a touching request in behalf of Timothy that "he may be with you without fear: for he worketh the work of the Lord, as I also do." (16:10.) His final exhortation sums up the whole letter: "Let all your things be done with charity." (16:14.)

 

Paul sends greetings from the churches of Asia, from Aquila and Priscilla, and from all of the brethren (16:19-20), and then adds his greeting "with [his] own hand," perhaps a reference to his own signature as in Colossians 4:18 and 2 Thessalonians 3:17. Just as he began his letter, Paul closes with the repetition of the name of the focal point of the gospel—the Lord Jesus Christ (three times in verses 22-24). He looks forward to the return of the resurrected Lord with the Aramaic exclamation Maran-atha (KJV) divided maran 'atha: "The Lord comes" (or "has come"), or marana'tha' "Come, O Lord!" (16:22), and seals the letter with the blessing of "the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ." Last but not least, he adds his personal prayer: "My love be with you all in Christ Jesus. Amen." (16:24.)

 

2 Corinthians: Historical Background

 

The events leading up to the writing of 2 Corinthians must be reconstructed from scattered references in the epistles to the Corinthians. After writing 1 Corinthians in Ephesus in the early summer of A.D. 57 (shortly before Pentecost, 1 Cor. 16:8), Paul had sent Timothy to Corinth to see how his letter was received and if the situation there had improved (1 Cor. 16:10-11). Evidence in 2 Corinthians suggests that initially the situation in Corinth got worse rather than better. There are allusions to a second visit by Paul to Corinth (2 Cor. 2:1; 12:14; and 13:1-2) to help rectify the situation; this visit was made "in heaviness" (2 Cor. 2:1). There are also references to a stern letter (2 Cor. 2:4; 7:8-12) sent by Paul. These references may be to 1 Corinthians or perhaps to another letter, now lost, sent in the interim between 1 and 2 Corinthians. Eventually, after his visit the letter, whether 1 Corinthians or another letter, got positive results that Paul later acknowledged: "For though I made you sorry with a letter . . . I perceive that the same epistle hath made you sorry." (2 Cor. 7:8.)

 

Meanwhile, still concerned about the Corinthians, Paul sent Titus and another unnamed brother to Corinth (2 Cor. 12:17-18), probably in connection with the collection for the Saints in Palestine. He had evidently prearranged to meet Titus returning from Corinth in Troas, and when Titus did not appear at Troas, he went to Macedonia to meet him there. (2 Cor. 2:12-13.) Paul's anxiety about the affairs at Corinth were finally relieved when Titus arrived and informed him that the Corinthians had mourned and repented of their past behavior. (2 Cor. 7:6-7.) Probably sometime in the fall of A.D. 57, the same year in which he had previously written 1 Corinthians, Paul wrote the epistle preserved in 2 Corinthians (actually his third or fourth letter to the Corinthians) to express his love and concern for the saints at Corinth and his relief and joy that they had responded to his rebuke, and to further encourage those who had remained rebellious to repent.

 

2 Corinthians: Structure and Contents

 

The epistle in 2 Corinthians is a personal and emotional letter and gives us much insight into the person of Paul. Most of the material in the letter is relevant to his relief at the repentance of many Corinthians and an explanation and defense of his ministry, directed toward those who have not yet repented. Thus there are passages reflecting many emotions, ranging from love and joy to impatience and anger. Perhaps due to its emotional nature, the letter does not contain a clear-cut structure as does 1 Corinthians, and much of the material can be divided many different ways. The following should be considered only as a general guide to the major themes and not as a comprehensive outline:

 

I. Introduction (1:1-14)

 

A. Salutation (1:1-2)

 

B. Thanksgiving/blessing (1:3-11)

 

II. Paul's apostolic ministry (1:15-9:15)

 

A. Paul's recent relations with the Church (1:15-2:13)

 

B. Paul's apostolic ministry (2:14-5:9)

 

C. Appeal for reconciliation (5:10-7:16)

 

D. The collection for Jerusalem (8:1-9:15)

 

III. Paul's defense of his ministry and call to repentance (10:1-13:10)

 

A. Initial appeal for obedience (10:1-18)

 

B. Paul replies to charges (11:1-12:13)

 

C. Concerns and warnings (12:14-13:10)

 

IV. Conclusion (13:11-14)

 

Following the formal introduction (1:1-14), the body of the letter is a loosely organized collection of material. In the first half of the letter Paul expresses his concern for the church at Corinth; explains his apostolic ministry; makes a plea for reconciliation of the saints with him, with each other, and with God; and makes an extended appeal for generous contributions to the relief fund to be sent to the saints in Palestine. (1:15-9:15.) In chapters 10 through 13 he makes a detailed defense of his apostolic calling and ministry, which had apparently been called into question by some in Corinth; replies to specific charges leveled at him; and ends with warnings directed at those who have not yet repented of their dissension. (10:1-13:10.) The letter ends, as do all of Paul's letters, with a formal conclusion and benediction. (13:11-14.)

 

I. Introduction: Salutation and Thanksgiving

 

It is apparent that Timothy had returned to Paul from Corinth, as he is included in Paul's salutation. (1:1-2.) As always in his letters, Paul addresses his thanksgiving to God, here referred to as "Father of our Lord Jesus Christ." (1:3.) The object of his gratitude is the comfort that proceeds from "the Father of mercies, and the God of all comfort; who comforteth us in all our tribulation." (1:3-4.) Paul sees fit to remind the saints at Corinth of the great afflictions and sufferings he has been called to bear in his missionary labors in Asia. Even though his trials were so great that at one point he says he "despaired even of life" (1:8), he has trust in the "God which raiseth the dead" (1:9)—probably a reference to the detailed exposition he had already sent them on resurrection in 1 Corinthians 15. Paul has experienced God's deliverance from death as a mortal and furthermore has the assurance that God will ultimately deliver him when he finally does succumb to death in the future. Trust in God's eventual deliverance from suffering provides comfort to all persons faced with affliction. Referring to the trials endured by many of the saints at Corinth, Paul assures them that just as the victory over death was wrought by Christ through suffering, so too it is through suffering that mortals can receive consolation and salvation: "For as the sufferings of Christ abound in us, so our consolation also aboundeth by Christ." (1:5-7.)

 

II. Paul's Apostolic Ministry

 

The epistle in 2 Corinthians demonstrates that Paul understood well, as a priesthood leader, the eternal principle outlined by the Prophet Joseph Smith in the Liberty Jail that "no power or influence can or ought to be maintained by virtue of the priesthood, only by persuasion, by long-suffering, by gentleness and meekness, and by love unfeigned; . . . reproving betimes with sharpness, when moved upon by the Holy Ghost; and then showing forth afterwards an increase of love toward him whom thou hast reproved." (D&C 121:41-43.) In a previous letter, and by his visit, Paul had sharply rebuked the saints at Corinth. In this letter he assures them that the letter was written "out of much affliction and anguish of heart" and was motivated solely by the love he had for them. (2:4.) Throughout 2 Corinthians he expresses an increasing love and concern for them.

 

Increased love should be exercised by the saints toward each other as well. In 2:5-11 Paul refers to a specific individual who had apparently been involved in a serious act of rebellion and who had subsequently repented. He advises the saints that they ought to "forgive him [the individual] and comfort him, lest perhaps such a one should be swallowed up with overmuch sorrow." (2:7.) Paul is teaching the principle that after he, representing the church, has forgiven someone, the members of the congregation must also find the capacity to forgive as well, "lest Satan should get an advantage." (2:11.)

 

Paul rejoices in his missionary labors and describes them as a "triumph in Christ." (2:14.) In chapter 3 he eloquently teaches how the new covenant instituted by Christ replaces the old covenant embodied in the law of Moses. The ancient prophets Jeremiah and Ezekiel had witnessed the destruction of Jerusalem and the scattering of her people, which were the disastrous results of centuries of Israel's disobedience (systematically recorded in the Old Testament) to the old covenant inscribed on tables of stone. They must have wondered if mortals could ever be obedient to the conditions of the covenant. To both of these prophets the Lord gave a vision of hope for the future. The Lord promised Jeremiah that he would establish a "new covenant," which he described thus: "I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts." He then echoed the same promise attached to the Mosaic covenant: "And [I] will be their God, and they shall be my people." (Jer. 31:31-33.) To Ezekiel came the word of the Lord couched in similar language: "I will give them one heart, and I will put a new spirit within you; and I will take the stony heart out of their flesh, and will give them an heart of flesh: that they may walk in my statutes, and keep mine ordinances, and do them: and they shall be my people, and I will be their God." (Ezek. 11:19; 36:26-27.)

 

Paul declares that Christ has now established this new covenant, and, building on the prophetic metaphor of stone and flesh, he describes it as a covenant "written . . . not in tables of stone, but in fleshy tables of the heart." (2 Cor. 3:3.) He adds that ultimately we look through Christ to God the Father, and it is he who has "made us able ministers of the new testament [covenant]." (3:4, 6.) fn Continuing with the imagery of stone and flesh, he teaches that the power of the new covenant—which makes it possible to fulfill its conditions—is found "not of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life." (3:6.)

 

Paul explains that the manifestation of God to Moses in the revelation of the old covenant was so glorious that Moses had to "put a vail over his face, that the children of Israel could not steadfastly look." (3:13.) He then expands on the Old Testament passage with an allegory, noting ironically that there remain some "even unto this day, when Moses is read, the vail is upon their heart." (3:15.) In other words, they are not able to see that the old covenant was transitory ("the end of that which is abolished," 3:13), and the "vail is [now] done away in Christ." (3:14.) Whereas once the law was written with letters on stone, now it is the Spirit that giveth life, and "the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty"—freedom from the death of the old law. (3:17.)

 

Paul reveals that it is through the Spirit that the covenant becomes internalized (written on the "fleshy tables of the heart"), and this internalization is a process by which a mortal, gradually becoming more like God, can acquire the power to comprehend and obey the conditions of the new covenant: "But we all, with open face beholding as in a glass the glory of the Lord, are changed into the same image from glory to glory, even as by the Spirit of the Lord." (3:18.)

 

In the next section Paul explains the reconciliation of fallen man to God made possible through the gospel. (5:11-7:16.) It is God who has initiated this process, "who hath reconciled us to himself by Jesus Christ." (5:18.) An individual who enters into the new covenant in Christ becomes a "new creature" (5:17), and the Atonement makes it possible for that person to repent of "trespasses" and achieve reconciliation with God the Father (5:19). Paul links this concept to his defense of the divine authority of his apostleship that follows, noting to the Corinthians: "Now then we are ambassadors for Christ, as though God did beseech you by us." (5:20.) His role as their priesthood leader has been a painful one, and he has had the unpleasant task of calling them to repentance. (7:4-9.) He is relieved that finally they have humbled themselves and that they "sorrowed to repentance." (7:9.) While God has initiated the possibility of reconciliation, it is the duty of the individual saints to finally make it effective in each of their lives by repentance and righteous living.

 

Years earlier, probably around A.D. 44, the council in Jerusalem had decided that a collection would be made from the church to send to the impoverished saints in Palestine, and Paul and Barnabas were put in charge of the project. (Acts 11:29-30.) Now, thirteen years later, Paul is still carrying out his assignment. Elsewhere in his epistles he briefly mentions this undertaking (1 Cor. 16:1-4; Rom. 15:24-29), but in chapters 8 and 9 in 2 Corinthians, he gives an extended exposition on the subject. He begins his long and tactful appeal for contributions from the Corinthians, giving as an example the generosity of the Macedonians, who, in spite of their "deep poverty," had given abundantly. (8:1-5.) He does not exert his authority to command compliance or prescribe an amount, but wishes it to be a voluntary contribution "to prove the sincerity" of their love. (8:8.) He gently attempts to persuade the Corinthians, comparing the gift to "the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, that, though he was rich, yet for your sakes he became poor, that ye through his poverty might be rich." (8:9.) Paul goes to great lengths to attest the honesty and trustworthiness of the two unnamed messengers that have been sent to collect the funds (8:16-9:5) and then enumerates the blessings promised for generosity (9:6-15). He compares charitable contributions to the law of the harvest, writing that "he which soweth sparingly shall reap also sparingly; and he which soweth bountifully shall reap also bountifully." (9:6.)

 

III. Paul's Defense of His Ministry and Call to Repentance

 

At the heart of the contention in the church at Corinth are those who have ridiculed Paul and denied his authority. His necessary response is a bold and vigorous defense of his apostolic authority and his work in the ministry. (10:1-13:10.) Some had accused him of "walk[ing] according to the flesh" (10:2), and others had ridiculed his physical appearance and his inelegant speech (10:10). Elsewhere in the same letter he addressed the charges that he was vacillating and indecisive. (2 Cor. 1:17-18; 4:1-2.)

 

Paul acknowledges that such charges against him, or any of the authorities of the church, are a sure sign of apostasy and therefore a very serious matter. He fears that the saints in Corinth will be beguiled by false apostles, "transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ" (11:13) and preaching another Christ, another spirit, and another gospel. The kingdom of God is a house of order, and to work in the ministry "a man must be called of God" (Article of Faith 5) for "not he that commendeth himself is approved, but whom the Lord commendeth" (10:18).

 

In his defense, Paul gives a detailed account of his ministry. (11:1-12:13.) Employing the Old Testament imagery of Israel as the bride of the Lord, he portrays himself as the father (founder) of the church at Corinth who has betrothed his daughter (the church) as a chaste virgin to her husband, Christ. (11:2.) In spite of his weaknesses of body and speech—he sarcastically refers to himself as a fool—Paul has given all of his time and energy to building up the church. He recounts at length some of the great persecutions, dangers, and afflictions he has endured (11:24-33) as a witness to his dedication, and he also refers to the great visions and revelations he has enjoyed. (12:1-7.) He declares, "I take pleasure in infirmities, in reproaches, in necessities, in persecutions, in distresses for Christ's sake: for when I am weak, then am I strong." (12:10.)

 

Paul then solemnly warns the Saints, "Truly the signs of an apostle were wrought among you in all patience, in signs, and wonders, and mighty deeds." (12:12.) He informs them of his plans for another visit (12:14-13:10), reminding them once again, "We do all things, dearly beloved, for your edifying (12:19). He also includes a warning against continued dissension, contention, and immorality, expressing the fear that when he returns, he will find "debates, envyings, wraths, strifes, backbitings, whisperings, swellings, tumults," and those who "have sinned already, and have not repented of the uncleanness and fornication and lasciviousness which they have committed." (12:20-21.)

 

IV. Conclusion

 

Paul's conclusion to 2 Corinthians is short and to the point. Echoing the theme of love and unity well-known from his letter in 1 Corinthians, and with great emotion, he sums up the totality of his ministry to the Corinthians in the final four verses. He bids the Saints farewell and exhorts them, "Be perfect, be of good comfort, be of one mind, live in peace; and the God of love and peace shall be with you." (13:11.) Whereas Paul included salutations from numerous individuals in his conclusion to 1 Corinthians (16:19-20), here he sends the greetings of "all the saints," presumably the members of the church in Macedonia to whom he has "boasted" of the Corinthians. (See 2 Cor. 9:2.)

 

His final succinct benediction includes a special blessing from each member of the Godhead: "The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ, and the love of God, and the communion of the Holy Ghost, be with you all. Amen." (13:14.) He may have been describing a process here whereby through the atonement of Christ and the gift of love from God, the Saints may enjoy fellowship with each other and "communion with the Holy Ghost." fn In light of the emphasis on love, brotherhood, and unity prevalent in Paul's two surviving letters to the Corinthians, it is a fitting blessing for the saints there—and for that matter for the saints everywhere.

 

Joseph Smith, in a letter dated October 19, 1840, to the Twelve laboring in the mission field in England, repeated to the saints in the last dispensation the challenge of brotherhood and love that Paul gave to the infant church at Corinth. The Prophet reminded the Latter-day Saints of the importance of love and unity in the church. Like Paul, he looked back to the past, referring to the "oneness of heart" realized as Zion by the City of Enoch and prophesied by Ezekiel (11:19) as a sign of the new covenant. Then, quoting Paul from the opening verses of 1 Corinthians, the Prophet looked forward to the future return of the Savior:

 

Let the Saints remember that great things depend on their individual exertion, and that they are called to be co-workers with us and the Holy Spirit in accomplishing the great work of the last days; and in consideration of the extent, the blessings and glories of the same, let every selfish feeling be not only buried, but annihilated; and let love to God and man predominate, and reign triumphant in every mind, that their hearts may become like unto Enoch's of old, and comprehend all things, present, past and future, and "come behind in no gift, waiting for the coming of the Lord Jesus Christ." [1 Cor. 1:7.] fn

 

In the introductory section of the Doctrine and Covenants, the Lord has revealed, just as Paul wrote to the Corinthians (1 Cor. 1:27), that "the weak things of the world shall come forth and break down the mighty and strong ones." (D&C 1:19.) The source of the power of the weak is unity, and great is the power of love, brotherhood, and friendship through which the saints become one. Jesus taught that love among mortals is patterned after the divine and is an expected fruit of the gospel: "A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another; as I have loved you. . . . By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one to another." (John 13:34-35.) The Lord has strongly reemphasized this injunction in our dispensation: "I say unto you, be one; and if ye are not one ye are not mine." (D&C 38:27.)

 

But the greater power of the weak is found in a higher oneness to which mortal unity is but a prerequisite. Jesus prayed to his Father for his disciples "that they all may be one; as thou, Father, art in me, and I in three, that they also may be one in us." (John 17:21.) As Latter-day Saints, we—just as the Corinthians—can begin to comprehend (though as mortals "we see through a glass, darkly"—1 Cor. 13:12) and receive that power which derives from this divine unity, by first loving each other.

 

Notes

 

David R. Seely is assistant professor of ancient scripture at Brigham Young University.

 

Footnotes

 

1. The exact chronology of Paul's life and the order of his epistles present many problems for the historian. For the most part this study follows the reconstruction found in Richard Lloyd Anderson, Understanding Paul (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1983). See especially his discussion in pages 390-98.

 

2. Richard Kugelman, "The First Letter to the Corinthians," in The Jerome Biblical Commentary: Volume II The New Testament, ed. Raymond E. Brown, Joseph A. Fitzmyer, and Roland E. Murphy (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc., 1968), p. 254. The meaning of korinthiazomai "to practice fornication" was known in Classical Greek as well; see Aristophanes Fr. 354, Liddell, Scott, and Jones Greek-English Lexicon, p. 981.

 

3. Paul's arrival at Corinth can be dated with some confidence to A.D. 50 because of an inscription found at Delphi that dates the beginning of Gallio's term as governor of Achaia in A.D. 51. Assuming that Paul was brought before Gallio in the first year of his rule, we can count back a year and a half and date his arrival in A.D. 50. For a complete discussion, see Anderson, Understanding Paul, pp. 390-92.

 

4. Aquila and Priscilla may have been among those Jews expelled from Rome by edict of Claudius. Dated by some scholars to A.D. 49, this edict is attested by Suetonius, Claudius 25: "Since the Jews constantly made disturbances at the instigation of Chrestus (Christ?), he [Claudius] expelled them from Rome." See Hans Conzelmann, 1 Corinthians (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1975), p. 13.

 

5. 1 Corinthians 12:2 suggests that the majority of the members were Gentiles.

 

6. See discussion in David R. Seely, "From Unprofitable Servant to Beloved Brother in Christ," chapter 11 in this volume. See also William F. Orr and James A. Walther, 1 Corinthians, Anchor Bible Series 32 (Garden City, New York: Doubleday & Co., 1976), p. 143.

 

7. Kugelman, "The First Letter to the Corinthians," p. 256.

 

8. For further discussion of Paul and marriage see Anderson, Understanding Paul, pp. 24-25, 104-6.

 

9. Ibid., p. 106.

 

10. Peter, like Paul, portrays the imagery of Israel being redeemed from slavery as a type of the atonement by which mankind is redeemed "with the precious blood of Christ." (1 Pet. 1:17-21.)

 

11. Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, comp. Joseph Fielding Smith (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1976), p. 231.

 

12. For a more complete discussion of 1 Corinthians 13, see Richard Lloyd Anderson's excellent treatment in Understanding Paul, pp. 117-25.

 

13. The Greek translators of the Old Testament translated the Hebrew term for covenant (berit) as diatbeke, a term in a broad sense referring to an arrangement made between two parties, but specifically referring to a legal will. This is the term used in the New Testament for covenant. From the legal connotation of diatbeke derived the Vulgate testamentum and the English testament. Therefore "the new testament" in 2 Corinthians 3:6 refers to "the new covenant," as opposed to the "old" Mosaic covenant.

 

14. "Communion with the Holy Ghost" — be koinonia tou hagiou pneumatos. Koinonia is the word often translated as fellowship that denotes a close relationship between human beings, often used in Greek in referring to the intimate relationship of marriage. The genitive "the Holy Ghost," tou hagiou pneumatos, can be taken with koinonia to mean "communion (or fellowship) with the Holy Ghost" or it may be understood as a subjective genitive or a genitive of quality meaning "fellowship brought about by the Holy Spirit." See Walter Bauer, A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament, rev. and ed. by F. Wilbur Gingrich and Frederick W. Danker, 2nd ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979), pp. 438-39. Often such grammatical ambiguity purposely suggests both interpretations. The context linking it with grace and love indicates that in either case, unity of the saints is directly related to "communion of the Holy Ghost." Joseph Smith taught that "through the love of the Father, the mediation of Jesus Christ, and the gift of the Holy Spirit, [the Saints] are to be heirs of God, and joint heirs with Jesus Christ." (Lectures on Faith [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1985], 5:3.)

 

15. Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, pp. 178-79.

 

 

(Robert L. Millet, ed., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 6: Acts to Revelation [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1987], 57.)

 

The saints in Corinth believed in baptism for the mortal body, so why don’t you believe in the resurrection of the same body?

 

The Resurrection

 

Human hopes never exploded with more power than in Paul's doctrinal climax of 1 Corinthians 15. Can the Resurrection be doubted? This chapter's brilliant beginning, middle sequences, and final completeness become vivid realities as one perceives its blending of prophecy and clear knowledge of the apostles. These truths can be ignored or ridiculed but not refuted, for here they come from an eyewitness who soberly reports personal knowledge and that of the Twelve. The fiery dawn of immortality glows in the triumphant words of the apostle. Who can be indifferent to the future that all will meet? What intelligent choice remains but to learn and prepare? Paul's rich explanations reveal how weakly modern Christian theologians understand the rich knowledge possessed by Paul.

 

"How do some among you say that there is no resurrection of the dead?" (1 Cor. 15:12, NKJB.) Paul's whole discussion centers around this clear question and one other. Reminding the Saints of the certainty of Christ's resurrection, he asks how one could believe in that without believing in the resurrection of mankind. Before the Gospels were written, Paul lists resurrection appearances to leading apostles, to all the apostles, and to "above five hundred brethren at once," most of whom were still alive (1 Cor. 15:6). These were not vague rumors, but virtual challenges to ask available people about their personal experiences. The Early Church knew firsthand from living witnesses. And one was Paul, who added last but not least that he had seen the Lord (1 Cor. 15:5-8). We are not "false witnesses," he insists (1 Cor. 15:15). He is not accusing the Corinthians of doubting Christ's resurrection, but jolting them with its reality for consistency's sake. That is the key to the chapter, for doctrines of salvation turn to jarring contradictions if they do not include the resurrection of mankind. If "there is no resurrection" (1 Cor. 15:12)—if "the dead rise not" (1 Cor. 15:15), then the central realities fail. And Paul lists them in order: (1) Christ's own resurrection (1 Cor. 15:13); (2) the apostles' integrity (1 Cor. 15:15); (3) forgiveness through Christ (1 Cor. 15:17); (4) the value of baptisms for the dead (1 Cor. 15:29); (5) the value of Paul's sacrifices and risks (1 Cor. 15:30-32). This perspective is critical in understanding baptism for the dead, for many commentators toss it aside as a local practice that Paul did not accept. Such an argument is simply nearsighted—the other four points on the above list are not only true but interlocked in Christ's plan of salvation. Baptism for the dead cannot be moved from its rightful relationship by skeptics' shrugs.

 

Paul started 1 Corinthians 15 with the testimony that "Christ died for our sins" (1 Cor. 15:3, also 17), but his real subject was the resurrection of mankind that must follow Christ's own resurrection: "For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive" (1 Cor. 15:22). Thus there will be a general or universal resurrection, and death itself will disappear (1 Cor. 15:26). Thus Paul refutes the terrible thought that those who have "fallen asleep in Christ" might have perished (1 Cor. 15:18). But what of those who have "fallen asleep" without Christ? The universal resurrection must include them. Is this apparently missing group really missing? The powerful section on the general resurrection is prefaced by the category of those "fallen asleep in Christ" (1 Cor. 15:18) and concluded by concern over those dead for whom baptisms are being done (1 Cor. 15:29). Paul's thinking is strictly logical if he is saying that the universal resurrection will bring forth both believers and those dying as unbelievers, whose work was being done for them. The Resurrection is not universal unless that majority without Christ are resurrected. And the Resurrection is unjust unless the dead without Christ have the opportunity to accept him. Thus, baptism for the dead is not incidental to Paul's argument. Nor is it casually thrown into the chapter; everything else in 1 Corinthians 15 is strict and relevant truth. Peter's first letter shows that the Early Church knew a good deal about the gospel in the spirit world. (Appendix C discusses early Christian convictions about preaching to and baptizing for the dead.) Most of the recent translations change "baptized for the dead" to "baptized on behalf of the dead," supporting Joseph Smith's revelations on this subject.

 

"How are the dead raised up—and with what body do they come?" (1 Cor. 15:35.) This second question raises issues of the timing and kinds of resurrection. The plural here is scripturally necessary, for no one responsibly interprets Paul's three glories in 1 Corinthians 15 without correlating them with Paul's three heavens in 2 Corinthians 12. Also, Paul unites with John in teaching a resurrection of those that are "Christ's at his coming" and a final resurrection later (1 Cor. 15:23 and Rev. 20:6-13). Are not these two distinct "glories"? Joseph Smith and Sidney Rigdon puzzled over this problem in John 5:29, reasoning that various degrees of faithfulness should bring various rewards. And their resulting vision (D&C 76) became the basis of the detailed knowledge of the life to come held by Latter-day Saints. That revelation does not depend on Bible interpretations, though Paul's words contradict the traditional idea of a heaven and hell and support Joseph Smith's revelation of the three degrees of glory. So does a remarkable early Christian source. Irenaeus, bishop of Lyon, wrote about A.D. 170, often quoting his teacher Polycarp, who had seen John the Apostle. Apparently referring to this transmission of information, Irenaeus quotes "the elders, the disciples of the apostles," about distinct heavens in the hereafter. Such traditional information would not necessarily be accurate in detail, but that the Early Church believed in three heavens is striking:

 

As the elders say, then also shall they which have been deemed worthy of the abode in heaven go there, while others shall enjoy the delight of paradise, and others again shall possess the brightness of the city; for in every place the Savior shall be seen, according as they shall be worthy who see him. They say moreover that this is the distinction between the habitation of them that bring forth a hundred-fold, and them that bring forth sixty-fold, and them that bring forth thirty-fold; of whom the first shall be taken up into the heavens, and the second shall dwell in paradise, and the third shall inhabit the city; and that therefore our Lord has said, "in my Father's house are many mansions." fn

 

Paul pictured multiple glories in answering what kind of body could come forth in the Resurrection. Some scoffed, claiming that physical imperfections were inconsistent with a physical resurrection (1 Cor. 15:35). Paul's sharp answer was that the insignificant seed was left behind as the new crops flourished, a symbol of human change from mortality to "incorruptible" immortality. But there must be more than that simple metaphor, for Paul took time to develop the varieties of the harvest. The mortal planting stage is singular in his language ("body"), but the Resurrection yields "celestial bodies" and "bodies terrestrial." Since these adjectives usually mean "heavenly" and "earthly," some translations write that alone, suggesting that Paul is simply contrasting the sowed earthly bodies with the resurrected, heavenly bodies. But that causes a severe problem of definition. Generally in Paul, and in this chapter, "glory" is the stage of resurrection: "It is sown in dishonour; it is raised in glory" (1 Cor. 15:43). Thus "celestial" and "terrestrial," would be states of resurrected "glory" (1 Cor. 15:40), followed by comparisons of eternal brilliance: "There is one glory of the sun, another glory of the moon, and another glory of the stars; for one star differs from another star in glory" (1 Cor. 15:41, NKJB). And the concluding sentence summarizes all these as future: "So also is the resurrection of the dead" (1 Cor. 15:42). Sun, moon, or stars are not images of "corruption" but of "glory." fn

 

Is the resurrection physical? Modern revelation plainly says so: "Every limb and joint shall be restored to its body" (Alma 40:23). But modern ministers have their doubts. One spokesman generalizes for his church but really speaks for liberal Christian ministers everywhere:

 

With a few exceptions, Presbyterians do not interpret the phrase in the Apostles' Creed, "the resurrection of the body," as meaning the physical body. Saint Paul writes: "Flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God . . ." They understand "the resurrection of the body" as a reference to the spiritual body of the resurrection. Paul writes: "It is sown a natural body; it is raised a spiritual body." . . . Our Lord's sinless body . . . was transformed into a spiritual body. Saint John in his Gospel suggests that the resurrected body of Jesus for evidential purposes retained certain physical properties. fn

 

Thus "physical properties" are left behind as educated ministers now define resurrection. But their position is dangerously close to the Corinthian heresy that Paul was correcting. Jesus told Peter that "flesh and blood" had not revealed his knowledge of Christ (Matt. 16:17), and Paul told the Galatians that he did not confer "with flesh and blood" right after his conversion (Gal. 1:16). In both cases, the phrase is simply a metaphor for mortality. Thus Paul answered Corinthian scoffers by saying that the mortal, flesh-and-blood body would not come up in the Resurrection (1 Cor. 15:50). But as a "body" it retains its physical properties. Jesus contrasted his resurrected body to a spirit: "A spirit hath not flesh and bones as ye see me have" (Luke 24:39). And instead of Christ being an "evidential" exception, Paul told the Corinthians and others that Christ was the example of the resurrection of mankind: "The second man is the Lord from heaven. . . . We shall also bear the image of the heavenly" (1 Cor. 15:47, 49).

 

Modern revelation gives many insights into the Resurrection. A "spiritual body" (1 Cor. 15:44; D&C 88:27) would better be called a "glorified body," for it is the mortal body perfected. "They who are of a celestial spirit shall receive the same body which was a natural body . . . and your glory shall be that glory by which your bodies are quickened" (D&C 88:28). The glorified frame will be flesh and bone, though not "flesh and blood" (mortal) for Joseph Smith repeatedly spoke "as one having authority," saying, "When our flesh is quickened by the spirit, there will be no blood in the tabernacles." fn All will "raise by the power of God, having the spirit of God in their bodies and not blood." fn

 

 

(Richard Lloyd Anderson, Understanding Paul [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1983], 125.)

 

The culture destroyed the Church from within and without; the members didn’t have strong enough testimonies to withstand the onslaught from their environment.