Church History – Apostasy

 

January 30, 2004

 

 

 

Bruce said we will be studying Church History in the late evening class throughout the year.  There will be 3 parts, this class starts with the Great Apostasy and ends with the great debate of August 1844, between Brigham Young and Sidney Rigdon.

 

Read the green manual chapters 1-4, he will go into greater detail in class.

 

Someone in class asked Bruce how he remembered so much.  He answered with this method of teaching his brain.  First, he studies the STORYLINE, and then you have a CONTEXT of what is being discussed.  Always study the chapter headings, also, place each subject in a category in your long term memory.  I need to organize myself in this manner.

 

1st Great American Awakening – 1740-1760, a few Founding Fathers were Deists

 

About Deism

Deism denies the direct intervention in the natural order by God. It posits, to borrow an old illustration, the idea that God is like a clockmaker. God winds up the clock of the earth and it proceeds on its own without any further involvement from Him. This idea, found as early as Nicolaus of Oresmes (d. 1382), rose to prominence in Europe in the late 1600’s and remained fairly popular into the 1800’s. The deist believes in the reality of God, but sees no need to pray. God is an absentee landlord. He doesn’t interfere in natural law or mans’ ways. Laws of nature will prevail and guide men and women accordingly. Neither does God provide miracles. Reason and intellect, mediated by experience, guide the deist. Whereas natural laws that govern the universe are fixed, deist understandings of God can be quite relative- evolutionary; and I suppose to them, even extraordinary.

This belief system never really caught on amongst the colonists- the majority of which were Christian of the Calvinist order. Many states at the time of the Constitutional Convention did not allow confessed deists to hold public office (Bowen, 1966), as deism was generally held in low esteem. That is because roughly two-thirds of the colonists held beliefs that aligned with Calvinist thinking (Boettner, 1972). Calvinism is a theological system that is, in many ways, similar to our own. It asserts that God created man in an ideal state- but man fell into sin. Mankind, therefore, possesses a sinful nature and is unable to please God by his own efforts- though he certainly can choose to do good even though his nature is inclined toward sin. To encourage moral conduct, laws were necessary to set up checks and balances relating to both sin and power (Eidsmoe, 1987). The challenge before the Great Convention in 1787 was to find ways to, given the sinful nature of mankind, allocates power to government sufficient to serve and restrain the masses without becoming a tyrant.

These ideas were so accepted amongst the colonists that deism never was (or will be) a dominant force in American life; how then, could deists have truly and deeply influenced the American founding? Dr. M. E. Bradford (1982) of the University of Dallas has written a series of biographical sketches on the fifty-five delegates to the Constitutional Convention. I could list each delegate and their religious affiliation(s) here, but suffice it to say that Bradford’s list includes 28 Episcopalians, 8 Presbyterians, 7 Congregationalists, 2 Lutherans, 2 Dutch Reformed, 2 Methodists, 2 Roman Catholics, and 3 deists. One religious preference is unknown to historians. At most, 5.5 percent of America’s Founders were deists- 3 of 55, though many of these individuals may have embraced deist convictions at some point in their lives.

The three delegates Bradford identifies as deist- Hugh Williamson of North Carolina, James Wilson and Benjamin Franklin of Pennsylvania were raised in strict Calvinist homes, and all three originally studied for the ministry. Williamson preached in a Presbyterian Church, though he did not accept all the doctrines of the faith- which was true of many of the Founders. Following the death of his father, Wilson left the seminary and studied law in America. He attended the Episcopalian Church where his children were baptized, though he likely never joined. Nevertheless, Wilson’s speeches at the Convention highlighted his belief that law came from God and that man possessed moral obligation to choose right over wrong and to honor supreme law. Benjamin Franklin was a deist in his younger years, but it appeared that time and experience altered his beliefs. While he never joined any known Christian Church, Franklin declared at the Great Convention that “God governs in the affairs of men.” He also called for prayer among the delegates. If Franklin truly was a deist, his declaration affirming an interactive God and his call for prayer would have been hypocritical at best. For, according to deists, God does not intervene. Prayer is pointless.

In sum, while I am not certain of Mr. Clifford’s point in raising the issue, I am certain that deism was not the guiding light of the Constitutional Convention, at least where understanding and petitioning God were concerned.

From 1790 to 1830 the Second Great Awakening took place in New England and western New York.  This was Christian in nature.

 

(2 Thessalonians 2:2-3.)

 

 Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him,

 

2 That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand.

 

3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;

 

Apostasy in Greek:  APO (From)     STASIA (Rebellion) – a rebellion from or against a former allegiance.  It isn’t just dropping out, but fighting against!  It isn’t passive but active, leading!!

 

 

The failure to acknowledge God's omniscience is an enormous error that spreads through life and touches all our doings. For if we truly believe God to be what He says He is, and then we can follow His prophets, His proctors in this mortal school, without resentment or murmuring. True, we will not always understand, nor will we find counsel easy to take—but the challenges will be manageable, when we have been humbled by knowing how great God is. This then makes us more manageable! And even though it is true that there must be an "opposition in all things," none of us has the personal obligation to provide that opposition.

 

President Lee said on one occasion: "I want to bear you my testimony that the experience I have had has taught me that those who criticize the leaders of this Church are showing signs of a spiritual sickness which, unless curbed, will bring about eventually spiritual death." (Conference Report, October 1947, p. 67.)

 

The Prophet Joseph spoke of how apostates often bring severe persecutions upon their former friends and associates. "When once that light which was in them is taken from them they become as much darkened as they were previously enlightened, and then, no marvel, if all their power should be enlisted against the truth, and they, Judas like, seek the destruction of those who were their greatest benefactors." (HC 2:23.)

 

Strange, how often defectors leave the Church, but they cannot leave it alone!

 

 

(Neal A. Maxwell, All These Things Shall Give Thee Experience [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1979], 107.)

 

 

Early Church     Apostasy    {Darkness     Enlightenment     Restoration}

 

                                                                        Great Apostasy

 

 

1 Nephi 11-14 – verse 21 is the Lamb of God – the Atonement of Christ.

 

Verses 31-34 are about the last days of Christ, verse 35 the House of Israel rebelling against their own God, 2 Nephi 10, Jacob pointing out the people were the only ones to rebel against their own God.

 

1 Nephi 13:1 – Great=Large in the Book of Mormon.  Church=an assembly of people, not always a religious meeting.

 

1 Nephi 13:5-8 – Fight against God.

 

(1 Nephi 13:1-8.) – 1 Pride, 2 Wealth, 3 Immorality, the 3 desires of the abominable church.

 

1 And it came to pass that the angel spake unto me, saying: Look! And I looked and beheld many nations and kingdoms.

 

2 And the angel said unto me: What beholdest thou? And I said: I behold many nations and kingdoms.

 

3 And he said unto me: These are the nations and kingdoms of the Gentiles.

 

4 And it came to pass that I saw among the nations of the Gentiles the formation of a great church.

 

5 And the angel said unto me: Behold the formation of a church which is most abominable above all other churches, which slayeth the saints of God, yea, and tortureth them and bindeth them down, and yoketh them with a yoke of iron, and bringeth them down into captivity.

 

6 And it came to pass that I beheld this great and abominable church; and I saw the devil that he was the founder of it.

 

7 And I also saw gold, and silver, and silks, and scarlets, and fine-twined linen, and all manner of precious clothing; and I saw many harlots.

 

8 And the angel spake unto me, saying: Behold the gold, and the silver, and the silks, and the scarlets, and the fine-twined linen, and the precious clothing, and the harlots, are the desires of this great and abominable church.

 

 

 

 

EARLY CHRISTIANITY AND 1 NEPHI 13-14

 

Stephen E. Robinson

 

In chapters 13 and 14 of 1 Nephi, the prophet Nephi describes the vision in which he saw the future of the world and its kingdoms as it related to his posterity. Nephi's vision is the type of revelation known in biblical literature as apocalyptic, and it is represented in the New Testament most fully by the Revelation of John. The revelations of Nephi and of John have more in common, however, than merely the apocalyptic form, for Nephi's vision (1 Nephi 14:19-28) anticipates that of John. The two are complementary, centering in part on the same characters and themes: the Lamb and his Church, the Apostasy, the great and abominable church of the devil, and the restoration of the gospel in the latter days. The purpose of this inquiry is to see whether the descriptions given by Nephi, specifically those of the Apostasy and of the great and abominable church, when added to the information of John and other pertinent scriptures, help us draw some historical conclusions about the nature of the Apostasy and the identity of the great and abominable church.

 

Before proceeding, however, we must define our terms. The Greek word apostasia (apostasy) means "rebellion" or "revolution." It conveys the sense of an internal takeover within an organization or institution by factions hostile to the intentions of its previous leaders. I personally prefer the translation "mutiny" for apostasia, as it calls up the image of a ship being commandeered by those who are not authorized to do so and being taken in a direction the ship was not intended to go. Since early Christians often thought of the Church as a ship, I think "mutiny" conveys exactly the right sense of what Paul and others meant by the term apostasy.

 

We must also analyze and define the component parts of the phrase great and abominable church. The word great in this context is an adjective of size rather than of quality and (like the Hebrew gadol or the Greek megas) informs us of the great size of the abominable entity. Secondary meanings might refer to great wealth or power. fn The term abominable is used in the Old Testament to describe that which God hates, which cannot fail to arouse his wrath. In the book of Daniel the abomination of desolation is that thing which is so hateful to God that its presence in the temple causes the divine presence to depart, leaving the sanctuary desolate. (See Daniel 11:31; 12:11; Matthew 24:15; Joseph Smith—Matthew 1:12-20.) In the Old Testament the terms translated into English as abominable or abomination (Hebrew roots shiqqutz, ta'ab, piggul; Greek Septuagint and New Testament bdelugma) are usually associated with one of two practices: idolatrous worship or gross sexual immorality. fn

 

The term church (Hebrew qahal or edah; Greek ekklesia) had a slightly broader meaning anciently than it does now and referred to an assembly, congregation, or association of people which bonded them together and commanded their loyalties. Thus the term was not necessarily restricted to religious associations and, in fact, at Athens was used to denote the legislative assembly of government. fn When we put all this together it appears that the phrase great and abominable church means an immense assembly or association of people bound together by their loyalty to that which God hates. Most likely this will be a religious association involved specifically in sexual immorality and/or idolatry (that is, false worship—abandoning the God of Israel and worshipping anything else).

 

While the revelation of John does not use the exact term great and abominable church, the entity so described by Nephi is clearly the harlot described by John in Revelation 17-18, since the identical terms mother of abominations, mother of harlots, and the whore who sitteth upon many waters are used by both prophets (see 1 Nephi 14:10-12, 16 and Revelation 17:1, 5).

 

Major characteristics of the great and abominable church in 1 Nephi may be listed as follows:

 

1. It persecutes, tortures, and slays the Saints of God (13:5).

 

2. It seeks wealth and luxury (13:7).

 

3. It is characterized by sexual immorality (13:7).

 

4. It has excised plain and precious things from the scriptures (13:26-29).

 

5. It has dominion over all the earth, among all nations, kindreds, tongues, and people (14:11).

 

6. Its fate is to be consumed by a world war, in which the nations it incited against the Saints turn to war among themselves until they destroy the great and abominable church itself (22:13-14).

 

These same characteristics are also attributed to the whore (Babylon) in the Revelation of John:

 

1. She is drunk with the blood of the Saints and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus and of the prophets (17:6, 18:24).

 

2. She is characterized by the enjoyment of great wealth and luxury (17:4; 18:3, 11-16).

 

3. She (naturally) is characterized by sexual immorality (17:1, 2, 5).

 

4. She has dominion over all nations (17:15, 18; 18:3, 23-24).

 

5. Her fate is to be consumed by the very kings who have made war on the Lamb under the influence of her deceptions (17:14-16; 18:23).

 

It should be noted that one characteristic not common to both prophetic descriptions is Nephi's statement that the great and abominable church has held back important parts of the canon of scripture. But since John's record is one of the very scriptures Nephi refers to (14:20-23), this omission in John's account is not surprising.

 

It must also be noted that in John's Revelation the whore cannot be equated with the two beasts; they do not represent the same things. The whore and the beasts are motivated by the same evil genius, Satan. The one beast supports the whore (Revelation 17:3), but the beast and the whore are separate entities with separate functions in the evil empire. The whore of Revelation 17-18 is specifically the satanic counterpart of the woman in chapter 12 who symbolizes the Church of Jesus Christ which was forced into the wilderness (that is, became inaccessible to human beings). Symbolizing the great and abominable church (the counterfeit) as a whore underscores the nature of her evil: she is physically and spiritually unfaithful, that is, she represents both sexual immorality and idolatry, the twin abominations of the Old Testament. Thus she is the "mother of abominations." It seems that in John's Revelation the symbol of the whore is used narrowly to represent false religion, while the beasts, the image of the beast, and the horns of the beast serve to represent other aspects of the kingdom of the devil. Moreover, if the symbol of the virtuous woman of Revelation 12 is intended to represent specifically the true Church of Jesus Christ (and the crown of Twelve Apostles and her being driven into the wilderness so indicate) fn, it follows that the whore, her counterpart, represents specifically false and counterfeit religion. Satan has more than one institution at his disposal, but the whore is false religion. The whore cannot represent kingdoms or governments—the beast and its horns do that (Revelation 17:12). fn But she can represent the false beliefs and ideologies that often capture or motivate governments. The whore provides the theory; government provides the muscle. When the false religion represented by the whore is joined to the civil governments (the kings of the earth) represented by the horns of the beast with whom she fornicates, then the wine of their fornication (the results of the union of church and state, or of ideology and police power) plunders the resources of the earth and makes all the world drunk. That is, the power of the state church, or of the church state, seeks to dominate the economy of nations and destroys the spiritual equilibrium and discernment of human beings (Revelation 17:2; 18:3).

 

Moreover, since the great and abominable church from 1 Nephi is identified in every aspect with the whore, while the beast is never even mentioned in Nephi's vision, it follows that when we discuss the great and abominable church, we must not confuse the whore which Nephi saw and described with the beast which he didn't. There are no references to the beasts of Revelation in Nephi's vision of the great and abominable church. As both John and Nephi make clear, the nations outlast the whore, and they eventually destroy her. Both beast and whore are component parts of the kingdom of the devil, but they are separate parts even though they sometimes work together.

 

Perhaps the greatest difficulty in Nephi's description of the great and abominable church is an apparent contradiction between chapters 13 and 14. In 1 Nephi 13 the great and abominable church is one specific church among many. Indeed, Nephi's description of it as "most abominable above all other churches" (verses 5, 26) is nonsense otherwise. Moreover, it has a specific historical description: it is formed among the Gentiles after the Bible has been transmitted in its purity to the Gentiles by the Jews (verse 26), and it is the specific historical agent responsible for excising plain and precious truths from the scriptural record. It would appear that in chapter 13 Nephi is describing a specific historical institution as the great and abominable church. To this we must add the information given in Doctrine and Covenants 86:1-4, which states that the great and abominable church did its work after the Apostles had fallen asleep, that is, around the end of the first century A.D. Similarly, in the Revelation of John the role of the whore has a historical frame. She comes into the picture after the beasts, upon which she rides and which give her support, and she is eliminated from the picture while they yet continue. Again, the great and abominable church (Babylon) is not a term identical with "the kingdom of the devil," for the whore is only one of the component parts of a larger empire, together with the beasts, the image, the horns, and the false prophet—and also with other false churches. This last idea is clearly brought out in 1 Nephi 22:22-23:

 

But it is the kingdom of the devil, which shall be built up among the children of men, which kingdom is established among them which are in the flesh—

 

For the time speedily shall come that all churches which are built up to get gain, and all those who are built up to get power over the flesh, and those who are built up to become popular in the eyes of the world, and those who seek the lusts of the flesh and the things of the world, and to do all manner of iniquity; yea, in fine, all those who belong to the kingdom of the devil are they who need fear, and tremble. (Italics added.)

 

Indisputably, the full kingdom of the devil is made up of many churches (or denominations) and will be until the end of the world. Taking 1 Nephi 13 and 22 as our starting points, we might be justified in asking just which of all those false denominations is the actual great and abominable church of the devil. The apparent contradiction comes in 1 Nephi 14:10 where we are told that there are only two churches: "And he said unto me: Behold there are save two churches only; the one is the church of the Lamb of God, and the other is the church of the devil."

 

How can this be? How can the devil's church or churches be one and many at the same time? The apparent contradiction actually gives us the solution to the larger puzzle and ultimately our identification of the great and abominable church.

 

The answer is that the term is used in two different ways in these two chapters. In chapter 13 it is used historically and in chapter 14 it is used typologically, or apocalyptically. In apocalyptic literature (remember that both Revelation and Nephi 13-14 are apocalyptic in nature) the seer is caught up in vision and sees things from God's perspective. Time ceases to be an important element. This is why the chronology of John's Revelation at times seems to be scrambled; with God there is no time. Apocalyptic visions are highly symbolic, usually requiring an angelic interpreter for the seer to understand what he sees. But the symbols are inclusive; that is, they stand for archetypical categories into which all specific instances of something can be placed. This is why the whore can be called Nineveh (some of John's language comes from Nahum's description of Nineveh), fn or Babylon, Sodom, Egypt, Jerusalem, or Rome. It doesn't matter; the name change, but the character—”that great city”—remains the same in every dispensation. To illustrate, let us take the name of the whore, or great and abominable church: Babylon. A literal reading would lead us to believe that some particular city is being described, and we would want to know which city it was. But if we read carefully, we see that Babylon in John's Revelation is not one city but many cities, all of which fall into the larger category of "that great city" which is the antithesis of the city of God, the heavenly Jerusalem or Zion. Just as Zion is wherever the pure in heart dwell (Doctrine and Covenants 97:21), so Babylon is where the whore lives. Since Latter-day Saints understand that Zion is a spiritual category, which may in different contexts mean Salt Lake City, Far West, Jerusalem, or the city of Enoch, why do we have such a hard time understanding Zion's opposite, Babylon, in the same way? It is precisely this variable identity that Jacob teaches to us when he says: "Wherefore, he that fighteth against Zion, both Jew and Gentile, both bond and free, both male and female, shall perish; for they are they who are the whore of all the earth; for they who are not for me are against me, saith our God (2 Nephi 10:16; italics added).

 

In other words Babylon, "the whore of all the earth," is in this context anyone who fights against Zion. In apocalyptic literature the cast of characters is constant in every dispensation; they are these same archetypical categories into which all things can be placed. From the apocalyptic point of view there is only one script, one plot, from the foundation of the world until its end. The characters in the play and the lines they deliver are always the same from dispensation to dispensation, although the individual actors who play the roles and speak the lines may change with time. Therefore, there is always the role of "that great city," though the part might be played at different times in history by Sodom, Egypt, Nineveh, Babylon, Rome, Berlin, Moscow, or Washington, D.C. The important thing is to know what the archetypical patterns are and their identifying characteristics. Then we can orient ourselves in any time or place and know who functions now in the role of Babylon and where Zion is located.

 

Once we understand that the term great and abominable church has two extensions, the one open, inclusive, and archetypical, and the other limited and historical, the rest is easy. In chapter 14, Nephi describes the archetypical roles themselves: "There are save two churches only" (that is, Zion and Babylon). But in chapter 13 he is referring to the specific institution (the actor, if you will) who played the role of Babylon in the Roman Empire in the second century A.D. Nevertheless, it won't do us much good in the twentieth century to know who played Babylon in the second. We need to recognize Babylon now, in our time, although the actors have been changed.

 

Apocalyptic literature is also dualistic. Since it deals with archetypes, it boils everything down to opposing principles: love and hate, good and evil, light and dark. There are no gray areas in apocalyptic scripture. At the very least, everything can be reduced to the opposing categories of A and not-A ("They who are not for me are against me, saith our God" [2 Nephi 10:16]). In the realm of religion there are only two categories: religion that will save and religion that won't. The former is the church of the Lamb, and the latter—no matter how well intentioned—is a counterfeit. Thus, even a "good" church must still be part of the devil's kingdom in the sense used in 1 Nephi 14 ("there are save two churches only"), for it cannot do what it pretends to do. Nevertheless, such a church cannot be called the great and abominable church in the sense used in 1 Nephi 13, for its intentions are good and honorable, and quite often such churches teach people enough truth that they can then recognize the true church when they meet it. These churches do not slay the Saints of God, they do not seek to control civil governments, nor do they pursue wealth, luxury, and sexual immorality. Such churches may belong to the kindom of the devil in the apocalyptic sense, where there are only two categories, A and not-A, but they cannot be called the great and abominable church in the historical sense—the description is just not accurate. Furthermore, individual orientation to the Church of the Lamb or to the great and abominable church is not only by membership but by loyalty. Just as there are those on the records of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints who belong to the great and abominable church by virtue of their loyalty to Satan and his life-style (2 Nephi 10:16), so there are members of other churches who will eventually belong to the Lamb by virtue of their loyalty to him and to his life-style, which will lead to their accepting the saving ordinances. The distinction is based on who has your heart, not on who has your records.

 

It seems to me that many Latter-day Saints have made one of two errors in trying to identify the great and abominable church. The first is to believe that some specific denomination or other, to the exclusion of all others, has been the great and abominable church since the beginning of time. This is dangerous, for if we understand the great and abominable church to be one specific church, some will want to know which one it is, and an antagonistic relationship with that church or denomination will inevitably follow. It might, for example, be argued that Judaism was the great and abominable church. After all, the Jewish religious establishment of that day would seem to qualify on several points. They persecuted the Church and spilled the blood of the Saints. They crucified the Messiah, the Savior of the world. They joined religion together with civil government and used the police power to enforce their religious views. Both Pharisees and Sadducees were reproved by Jesus for their pursuit of wealth at the expense of justice. Jesus told the Pharisees that Satan was their father, and John referred to certain Jewish meetinghouses in Asia as "synagogues of Satan." (Revelation 2:9; 3:9). It was precisely this kind of religious argument—that the Jews were the infidels, the beast, the anti-Christ—that contributed to the Holocaust and that still fans the moral insanity of neo-Nazi religious groups. Has Satan's hand ever been more clearly discernible in any human undertaking? Latter-day Saints do not want to indulge in witch-hunting.

 

But while Jerusalem in A.D. 30 might have been one manifestation of Babylon, fn Judaism cannot be the great and abominable church described by Nephi and John. First, the Jews did not and clearly will not enjoy dominion over all the nations of the earth. Second, Nephi says that the scriptures were complete when they came forth from the mouth of a Jew, but were excised by the great and abominable church which had its formation among the Gentiles. And finally, according to the scriptures, it does not seem to be the fate of the Jews to be utterly consumed by the nations of the earth; it appears quite the opposite.

 

More often it has been suggested that the Roman Catholic Church might be the great and abominable church of 1 Nephi 13, but this is also untenable, primarily because Roman Catholicism as we know it did not yet exist when the crimes described by Nephi were being committed. In fact, the term Roman Catholic makes sense only after A.D. 1054, when it began to be used to distinguish the Western, Latin-speaking Orthodox church, which followed the bishop of Rome, from the Eastern, Greek-speaking Orthodox church, which followed the bishop of Constantinople (in association with others). Indeed, in the period between Peter and Constantine, there were other Christian churches besides the orthodox: Ebionites, Syrian and Egyptian Christians, Donatists, Gnostics, Marcionites, etc. We don't know very much about how they were related to each other. Even if we were to use the term "Roman" Catholic for the church which Constantine began making his state religion in A.D. 313 (and the other orthodox churches would object to this), still the New Testament as we know it (that is, without the excised plain and precious parts) had already been widely circulated by then. In other words, the work of the great and abominable church in slaying the Apostles and excising the scriptures had already been done. By the time Constantine joined church and state together in the fourth century, the Apostles had been dead for centuries, and the true church and its keys had already been lost. The commonly held notion of shifty-eyed medieval monks rewriting the scriptures as they copied is bigoted and unfair. In fact, we owe those monks a debt of gratitude that anything was saved at all. Besides, in comparison to some of the other Christian groups around, the orthodox Christians had quite a high standard of morality. By this time they had gone to the extremes of asceticism and can hardly be accused (in this period, anyway) of having many harlots and practicing gross immorality. In fact, in some areas of the ancient world, orthodoxy replaced an earlier more corrupt form of Christianity. Finally, during most of the period before 313, the orthodox were hardly in a position to persecute the Saints, as they were being thrown to the lions themselves.

 

The Catholic (that is, "universal") Church of the fourth century was the result of the Apostasy, its end product—not its cause. To find the real culprits in the case of the excised texts, we need to look at a much earlier period in Christian church history. None of the Presidents of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has ever identified Roman Catholicism as the great and abominable church. And, in speaking of Catholic and Protestant faiths, the Prophet Joseph Smith said:

 

The old Catholic church traditions are worth more than all you have said. Here is a principle of logic that most men have no more sense than to adopt. I will illustrate it by an old apple tree. Here jumps off a branch and says, I am the true tree, and you are corrupt. If the whole tree is corrupt, are not its branches corrupt? If the Catholic religion is a false religion, how can any true religion come out of it? If the Catholic Church is bad, how can any good thing come out of it? The character of the old churches has always been slandered by all apostates since the world began. fn

 

It was Martin Luther, not Joseph Smith, who identified the Roman Catholic Church as Babylon and the Pope as Antichrist. fn Besides, are we really to believe that Satan had no ministers in the world before there were Roman Catholics? Was there no Babylon to oppose Zion in the days of Cain, Nimrod, Pharaoh, or Herod?

 

Finally, I would like to submit that no single historical church or denomination known to us can be the great and abominable church in an exclusive sense. No single organization meets all the requirements:

 

1. It must have been formed among the Gentiles and must have controlled the distribution of the New Testament scriptures, which it edited and from which it deleted plain and precious things.

 

2. It must have slain the Saints of God and killed the Apostles and prophets.

 

3. It must be in league with civil governments and use their police power to enforce its religious views.

 

4. It must have dominion over all the earth.

 

5. It must pursue wealth, luxury, and sexual immorality, and must last until essentially the end of the world.

 

No one denomination fits the entire description. Neither does world Communism in our own day. The conclusion is inescapable—no single entity can be the great and abominable church from the beginning of the world to the end. Rather, the role has been played by many different actors in many different times, and the great and abominable church that Nephi described in 1 Nephi 13 is not the same one that crucified Christ or that martyred Joseph and Hyrum.

 

So the one error, as I see it, is to try to blame some modern denomination for the activities of an ancient great and abominable church described by both Nephi and John. The other error is to go too far the other way and remove the great and abominable church from history altogether. This latter approach does not acknowledge that there ever was or ever will be a historical manifestation of the great and abominable church. It allegorizes the term completely, so that it becomes merely a vague symbol for all the disassociated evil in the world. We cannot accept this in the face of clear and explicit scripture to the contrary, for if we do, we shall not be able to recognize the historical manifestations of the great and abominable church in our own time or in the times to come. On the one hand, we must avoid the temptation to identify the role of the great and abominable church so completely with one particular denomination that we do not recognize the part when it is played by some other organization, but on the other hand we must remember that the role will be played by some agency. Will we be able to recognize it?

 

To return to our original topic, can we identify the historical agency that acted as the great and abominable church in earliest Christianity and which Nephi and others describe? I would like to argue that the great and abominable church Nephi describes in chapter 13 had its origins in the second half of the first century and had essentially done its work by the middle of the second century. This period might be called the blind spot of ecclesiastical history, for it is here that the fewest primary historical sources have been preserved. Essentially, what happened is that we have good sources for New Testament Christianity (the New Testament documents themselves); then the lights go out (that is, we have very few historical sources), and in the dark we hear the muffled sounds of a great struggle. When the lights come on again a hundred years or so later, we find that someone has rearranged all the furniture and that Christianity is something very different from what it was in the beginning. That different entity can be accurately described by the term hellenized Christianity. The hellenization of Christianity is a phenomenon which has long been recognized by scholars of Christian history, but it is one which Latter-day Saints know better as the Great Apostasy. Hellenization means imposing Greek culture on the native cultures of the East. The result was a synthesis of East and West, with elements of the Greek West predominating, a melting-pot, popular culture which was virtually worldwide.

 

But in the realm of religion, synthesis means compromise, and when we speak in terms of the gospel, compromise with the popular culture of the world means apostasy from the truth. When Jewish Christianity and Greek culture met head-on in the gentile mission field in the middle of the first century, the Greeks eventually won, and Jewish Christianity was ultimately "revised" to make it more attractive and appealing to a Greek audience. Primary prejudices of the Hellenistic world were the "absolute" nature of God (that is, he cannot be bound or limited by anything) and the impossibility of anything material or physical being eternal. In order to accommodate these ideas and thus appeal to a broader gentile audience, Christianity had to discard the doctrines of an anthropomorphic God and the resurrection of the dead or else "reinterpret" them in a manner that had the same effect. fn This is precisely what some Greek Christians at Corinth had already done and against which Paul responds with such force in 1 Corinthians 15:12: "Now if Christ be preached that he rose from the dead, how say some among you that there is no resurrection of the dead?"

 

One assumption necessary to my line of reasoning is that the earliest apostates from the true primitive Church constituted the great and abominable church among the Gentiles. Therefore we need something to link the Apostasy with the great and abominable church, and I think we have such a link in many places, but two will suffice to make my point here. In 2 Thessalonians 2:3, Paul says: "that day shall not come, except there come a falling away [literally, an apostasy] first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition." This man of sin will sit in the temple of God showing himself that he is God (verse 4). The "mystery of iniquity" was already under way as Paul wrote (verse 7), and you will recall that one of the names of Babylon is "mystery" (Revelation 17:5). This son of perdition, or man of sin, Paul mentions is the counterfeit for the Man of Holiness—he is Satan. fn And the temple in which he sits is the church, now desolated of the divine presence by the abomination of apostasy and become the church of the devil. fn The church of the devil is any church that teaches the philosophies of men mingled with scripture, which dethrones God in the church and replaces him with man (2 Thessalonians 2:3f) by denying the principle of revelation and turning instead to human intellect. It is for this reason that creeds which are the product of human intellect are an abomination to the Lord FN—for they are idolatry: men worshipping the creations not of their own hands but of their own minds and knowing all along it is a creation of their intellect that is being worshipped.

 

Perhaps my point could be made more quickly by citing Doctrine and Covenants 86:3, where the Lord explicitly identifies the whore, Babylon, as the apostate church:

 

And after they have fallen asleep the great persecutor of the church, the apostate, the whore, even Babylon, that maketh all nations to drink of her cup, in whose hearts the enemy, even Satan, sitteth to reign—behold he soweth the tares; wherefore, the tares choke the wheat and drive the church into the wilderness.

 

Clearly, whatever denominational name we choose to give it, the great and abominable church described by Nephi and John and the earliest apostate church are identical. The fact is that we do not know really what name to give it. I have proposed hellenized Christianity, but that is a description rather than a name. Babylon in the first and second centuries may even have been a collection of different movements. The Jewish Christians could not let go of the law of Moses and so eventually gave up Christ instead. The "orthodox" adopted Greek philosophy. The Gnostics wallowed in the mysteries and in unspeakable practices on the one hand, or in mysteries and a neurotic asceticism on the other. Tatian and Marcion rewrote the scriptures, the latter boldly chopping out anything he did not like, and all of them together forced the virtuous woman, the true church of Jesus Christ, into the wilderness.

 

NOTES AND REFERENCES

 

Stephen E. Robinson is Associate Professor of Ancient Scripture at Brigham Young University.

 

Footnotes

 

1. See, for example, gadol and its cognates in W. L. Holladay, A Concise Hebrew and Aramaic Lexicon of the Old Testament (E. J. Brill: Leiden, 1971) pp. 55f.

 

2. Where the context is given, a large majority of occurrences of abomination and its forms refer to immorality or idolatry. Compare R. Young, Analytical Concordance to the Bible (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 1978), pp. 6f.

 

3. Originally, the term ekklesia, from two Greek words meaning "call" and "out," referred to those citizens who were called out or summoned to their public meetings by the heralds. Thus it was an ideal word to represent the body of individuals "called" by God "out" of the world through the Holy Ghost—the Church. The civil dimension of the word can be seen in Acts 19:32, where "assembly" in the Greek text is ekklesia, elsewhere translated as "church." However, we must remember that we don't know the original word behind "church" on the plates, but whatever it was; Joseph Smith chose to render it church and not assembly or something else.

 

4. This was also the view of the Prophet Joseph Smith. The Joseph Smith Translation of Revelation 12:7 reads: "nor the woman which was the church of God, who had been delivered of her pains, and brought forth the kingdom of our God and his Christ."

 

5. Compare also the Joseph Smith Translation of Revelation 13:1: "And I saw another sign, in the likeness of the kingdoms of the earth; a beast rise up out of the sea."

 

6. See Nahum 3.

 

7. See Revelation 11:8.

 

8. History of the Church 6:478.

 

9. One of the many instances which might be cited is found in Table Talk, No. 4487 (11 April 1539): "I believe the pope is the masked and incarnate devil because he is the Antichrist. As Christ is God incarnate, so the Antichrist is the devil incarnate." See T. Tappert and H. Lehmann (eds.) Luther's Works (Philadelphia: Fortress) 54:346.

 

10. An example might be cited in Acts 17:32-33 where the mere mention to the Greeks of the physical resurrection breaks up Paul's meeting with the Areopagus council.

 

11. The Joseph Smith Translation makes this identification even more apparent: "for there shall come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition. . . . For the mystery of iniquity doth already work, and he it is who now worketh, and Christ suffereth him to work, until the time is fulfilled that he shall be taken out of the way." (2 Thessalonians 2:3, 7.)

 

12. For Lucifer as the man of sin, see Bruce R. McConkie, Doctrinal New Testament Commentary, 3 vols. (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1973), 3:62-64.

 

13. Joseph Smith—History 1:19.

 

 

(Monte S. Nyman and Charles D. Tate, Jr., eds., First Nephi: The Doctrinal Foundation [Provo: BYU Religious Studies Center, 1988], 177.)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Church History – Apostasy – Reformation

 

February 6, 2004

 

 

There were several questions on terminology in the reading assignment.  The word township means an area of land with several villages therein, it’s an eastern US term.

 

BIBLE DICTIONARY
VULGATE

The name of the Latin (or “common”) version of the scriptures in use since the days of Jerome (4th century A.D.), which before his time was known as the Old Latin. The Vulgate was the Bible of the Middle Ages and the parent of all the translations into the modern languages of Western Europe.

The KJV is made of several Bibles and texts translated by the scholars who put it together.   They used the Hebrew, Vulgate, Septuagint, and an English version by John Wycliffe.  There was a great divide between Roman orthodox and Greek orthodox, they even use different Bibles.

 

 

 

BIBLE DICTIONARY
SEPTUAGINT

The Greek translation O.T. (so called because Jewish tradition said it was made in 70 days by 72 elders sent from Jerusalem) made in the first instance for the use of Greek-speaking Jews living in Alexandria in the reign of Ptolemy Philadelphus (284-246 B.C.), though parts were not finished till the middle of the second century B.C. Most of the from the O.T. in the N.T. are taken from this version; it was the Bible in common use at the beginning of the Christian era, and included the books we call the Apocrypha. This translation proved of immense service to the Christian Church, for it taught, in what was then the language of the civilized world, the religious truths that had been the special possession of the Hebrew race. In this way a church that was Jewish in origin was able to teach religion to the world. In commentary material the Septuagint is often referred to as the LXX.

Constantine was very much a Christian in his beliefs; however he waited just before his death to be baptized, a different kind of “death bed” repentance!   He believed that he would spend less time in purgatory if he waited to be baptized.  He established Christianity throughout the Roman Empire, thus stopping the intense persecution that the Christians suffered under his predecessors.

 

Sectarian View of the Godhead—The consistent, simple, and authentic doctrine respecting the character and attributes of God, such as was taught by Christ and the apostles, gave way as revelation ceased and as the darkness incident to the absence of divine authority fell upon the world, after the apostles and the Priesthood had been driven from the earth; and in its place appeared numerous theories and dogmas of men, many of which are utterly incomprehensible in their inconsistency and mysticism.

 

God, Sectarian Views of/In the year 325, the Council of Nice was convened by the emperor Constantine, who sought through this body to secure a declaration of Christian belief that would be received as authoritative, and be the means of arresting the increasing dissension incident to the prevalent disagreement regarding the nature of the Godhead and other theological subjects. The Council condemned some of the theories then current, including that of Arius, which asserted that the Son was created by the Father, and therefore could not be coeternal with the Father. The Council promulgated what is known as the Nicene Creed; and this was followed in time by the Athanasian Creed over which, however, controversy has arisen as to authorship. fn The creed follows: "We worship one God in Trinity, and Trinity in Unity, neither confounding the persons, nor dividing the substance. For there is one person of the Father, another of the Son, and another of the Holy Ghost. But the Godhead of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, is all one; the glory equal, the majesty coeternal. Such as the Father is, such is the Son, and such is the Holy Ghost. The Father uncreate, the Son uncreate, and the Holy Ghost uncreate. The Father incomprehensible, the Son incomprehensible, and the Holy Ghost incomprehensible. The Father eternal, the Son eternal, and the Holy Ghost eternal. And yet there are not three eternals, but one eternal. As also there are not three incomprehensibles, nor three uncreated; but one uncreated, and one incomprehensible. So likewise the Father is Almighty, the Son Almighty, and the Holy Ghost Almighty; and yet there are not three Almighties, but one Almighty. So the Father is God, the Son is God and the Holy Ghost is God, and yet there are not three Gods but one God." It would be difficult to conceive of a greater number of inconsistencies and contradictions expressed in words as few.

 

God, Sectarian Views of/The Church of England teaches the present orthodox view of God as follows: "There is but one living and true God, everlasting, without body, parts, or passions; of infinite power, wisdom, and goodness." The immateriality of God as asserted in these declarations of sectarian faith is entirely at variance with the scriptures, and absolutely contradicted by the revelations of God's person and attributes, as shown by the citations already made.

 

God, Sectarian Views of/We affirm that to deny the materiality of God's person is to deny God; for a thing without parts has no whole, and an immaterial body cannot exist. fn The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints proclaims against the incomprehensible God, devoid of "body, parts, or passions," as a thing impossible of existence, and asserts its belief in and allegiance to the true and living God of scripture and revelation.

 

 

(James E. Talmage, Articles of Faith [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1981], 42.)

 

 

Bruce discussed the Council of Nicea and its motive of revenge against Arius and his teachings.  He believed in mercy toward those who lapse in their faith, the hardliners felt otherwise and didn’t appreciate Arius’ change of heart.

 

 

 

 

The Nature of God

 

"It is the first principle of the gospel," said the Prophet Joseph Smith, "to know for a certainty the character of God." (TPJS, p. 345.) Knowledge of the nature and character of God was destroyed, we assert, during the long night of the Apostasy. It was restored by two Personages in a pillar of light and these words spoken to the boy Joseph Smith: "This is My Beloved Son. Hear Him!" (Joseph Smith-History 1:17.) More was learned about the character of God in the few minutes of the First Vision than in all the church councils ever called! The creeds of the world were finally canonized only in the fourth and fifth centuries, following long and sterile debates about the nature of the Godhead. The diverse views held today by much of Christendom have gradually evolved from those unenlightened speculations.

 

Doctrinal confusion about the mission of Christ and His relationship to the Father began within a few years of the Savior's death and resurrection. By the fourth century this confusion had resulted in deep doctrinal schisms within the church. The Emperor Constantine, fearing that the controversy threatened his secular power, particularly in the eastern parts of the Roman Empire, convened the Council of Nicaea in a.d. 325 to try to settle the issue. At its heart, the dispute centered on the nature of Christ. Was He, as some argued, "co-substantial and co-eternal" with the Father? Or was He, as Arius, a prominent churchman from Alexandria in North Africa, claimed, a creation of the Father who "once was not" and was hence intrinsically inferior to His celestial parent? Of the bishops present, many at first sought a vague pronouncement that would commit them to neither side. Eventually, however, the Council condemned Arius and, with reluctance on the part of some participants (who were removed from office and sent into exile by the Emperor Constantine), incorporated the word "homoousios" (one of substance) into the Nicene Creed to signify the equality of the Father and the Son.

 

 

(Alexander B. Morrison, Visions of Zion [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1993], 60.)

 

 

False Christ’s

 

JOSEPH FIELDING MCCONKIE

 

Joseph Fielding McConkie is professor of ancient scripture at Brigham Young University.

 

The scriptural warning against false Christs was the first of the signs of the times given by the Savior to his disciples. It, like the other signs, would signal that the time of the destruction of the kingdom of the Jews and their temple was upon them. This same sign, the coming of false Christs, was then repeated by the Lord as the first of the signs by which his disciples in our day are to know the time of his coming and the time of the destruction of the wicked are close at hand (Joseph Smith-Matthew 1:6, 21-22). Indeed, the signs of the times for the meridian dispensation were a foreshadowing of those of the last days. The events that lead to destruction in one era do so in another. This principle makes history marvelously prophetic.

 

REJECTING THE MESSIAH BROUGHT DESTRUCTION [Pagenum39-40]

 

The Book of Mormon makes it plain that the Jews were destroyed as a nation and scattered throughout the earth because they rejected Christ. That was the cause of their destruction and captivity in the days of Jeremiah and again after the crucifixion of Christ (1 Nephi 1:19-20; 2 Nephi 6:9-12). The Messiah sought by the Jews in the meridian of time was one who would redeem them not from the effects of sin but from the bondage of Rome. They sought a return to the glory of David's kingdom, not a return to the sanctity and purity of the cities of Enoch and Melchizedek, which were taken up into heaven (see JST Genesis 14:33-35). The truth of a Messiah who was God's Son had been lost to them. Diaspora had done nothing for their faith. They wanted a God as erudite as that of the Greek philosophers, one without body, parts, and passions, and they had been busy rewriting the Bible to accommodate those views. What they had not been able to accomplish with a revision of the text, they accomplished with allegory or symbolism. All references to an anthropomorphic God were to be considered metaphorically. A God who is not a personal being can hardly beget a son in anything but a symbolic sense. As their God became more and more impersonal and abstract, so did their feelings toward him. When God becomes a mystery and we cannot know him, then we cannot know what he expects of us. Thus a covenant people become a permissive people. They retain the forms of godliness—ceremony and ritual, along with the profession of loyalty to God—while rejecting, as did King Noah and his priests, the very idea that salvation requires more than outward observance.

 

The temple was the focal point of Jewish worship in Jesus' day. It was a magnificent edifice, one of the seven wonders of the ancient world. Herod's Temple, like Solomon's Temple before it, evoked awe and reverence. It symbolized the strength of their nation and of the protective hand of the Lord that rested on them. Yet, the Psalmist had prophesied that its builders would reject its chief cornerstone, and so they did (Psalm 118:22). Israel rejected the Christ, lost their birthright, and were dragged off into captivity. In time they returned to rebuild their temple. Yet, when their Savior came to them, they again rejected him (Matthew 21:41-42) and, having done so, were again ripe to lose their birthright and be scattered throughout the earth. Thus, the Savior prophesied, their temple, a type of their nation, would be destroyed and not one stone would be left standing on another, symbolizing their scattering throughout the nations of the earth (D&C 45:16-21).

 

The story is told with plainness in the Book of Mormon. In some future day when the scattered remnants (the stones) of Israel choose to accept Jesus as the Christ, the Redeemer, and Son of God, they will once again be gathered and their temple restored. Such events await their placing the Chief Cornerstone in its rightful place.

 

FALSE CHRISTS DESTROYED THE MERIDIAN CHURCH FROM WITHIN

 

"Take heed that no man deceive you," Christ told the meridian Twelve, "for many shall come in my name, saying—I am Christ—and shall deceive many; then shall they deliver you up to be afflicted, and shall kill you, and ye shall be hated of all nations, for my name's sake" (Joseph Smith-Matthew 1:5-7). Surely the message was sobering: You will be hated of all nations, and they will both afflict you and kill you. But who in those nations were the disciples being warned against? According to what we have just read, it was false Christs. There seem to be two important implications here: first, the Twelve would be betrayed from within the Church, not by those in the world who opposed their message; and second, the betraying of the faith would spread to all nations. It didn't matter where the Twelve went; they would be opposed and betrayed. That conclusion is sustained by the prophetic dream of Nephi: "Behold the world and the wisdom thereof; yea, behold the house of Israel hath gathered together to fight against the twelve apostles of the Lamb" (1 Nephi 11:35). Thus the Book of Mormon confirms that it was a reverence for the wisdom of the world that caused the house of Israel to betray the apostles.

 

We can reconstruct the story only in part, but that is sufficient to establish a pattern. The apostles took the message to the various nations. Many were converted but not in full. The Christian convert stood alone, overshadowed by the influence of the Jewish temple on the one hand and the Greek academy on the other. From the temple came the Judaizers, who wouldn't let go of their traditions; while from the academy came those indoctrinated in the monotheism of Plato. As if that were not enough, there were also the Gnostics, who were truer than true, straining everything through the veil of mysticism. And so the newly converted, wanting neither to give offense nor to appear as fools, sought common ground and a spirit of conciliation. In so doing, they modified the Christian message until it passed as it were into a new dialect, one that would have been very strange to the ear of those initially commissioned by Christ.

 

DECLARING HIS GENERATION

 

In the Old Testament's great messianic prophecy, Isaiah asked, "Who shall declare his generation?" (Isaiah 53:8), meaning, Who shall declare the genesis, or origin, of Christ? In early Christian history the answer became, Just about anyone, and all the ideas differed. The one idea that no one considered was that Christ was actually the Son of God. The idea that God could actually beget a son was too far-fetched to deserve consideration. Words simply didn't mean what they said where God and the gospel were concerned. The irony of this, if lost on virtually everyone else, was not lost on the editors of The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary on Historical Principles. In defining the meaning of generation in theology, they cite: "Strange G[eneration] this? Father and Son Co-eval [of the same age], two distinct and yet but one Ken [Kin]." fn

 

One of the first departures from the simple story of Christ's birth centers on the account of his baptism. To capture the argument of the Adoptionists, we must pass behind the synoptic Gospels and consult the "Gospel according to the Hebrews," an apocryphal work thought by some to be the original version of Matthew's Gospel. There, as in Justin Martyr and in the Acts of Peter and Paul, the heavenly voice addresses Jesus at the time of his baptism, using the Psalmist's words, "Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee" (Psalms 2:7). The Adoptionists reasoned that the investiture of sonship took place on the day of Christ's baptism, that being the occasion on which the divine element entered its human tabernacle and the heavenly adoption was announced by God. This doctrine apparently was first advocated by the Ebionites (Heb., "poor men"), a sect of Jewish Christians that flourished in the early centuries in areas east of Jordan. fn It seems to have been the "tendency of Jewish Christianity to shrink from the idea" of a God assuming a mortal body and "to be content to regard Jesus as the last and greatest of the prophets." Thus Ebionism became synonymous with the denial of Christ's divinity and the doctrine of a virgin birth. fn The Christian ascetics who held to the Mosaic law taught that the humanity of Jesus in no way distinguished him from other men until "the act of divine selection and consecration" that took place on the banks of the Jordan. Thus Christ was said to be of "an earthly lineage and a heavenly investiture." fn

 

It has also been held that the apostle Paul was an Adoptionist but that he differed with the Ebionites as to the time of adoption. Paul, that argument goes, believed Jesus to have been adopted at the time of his resurrection, and Romans 1:3-4 is cited as the proof text: "Jesus Christ was born of the seed of David according to the flesh; and declared to be the Son of God with power, according to the Spirit of holiness, by his resurrection from the dead." fn

 

Providing a complete contrast with the Adoptionist view of Christ's humanity is Docetism. Literally, the name means "to seem," which captures the essence of the idea that Christ's manhood and sufferings were apparent rather than real. Jesus, the Docetists held, came not in the flesh but rather as spirit that exhibited the appearance of the flesh. They believed his body was a "sort of a ghost that miraculously seemed to be a real body." The Docetists denied the birth of Jesus because a mortal birth would have made him subject to the power of the material world. fn

 

Christian historians tell us that after such notions developed, the idea of Christ's being divine from birth originated. They argue that the Infancy Gospels, the apocryphal New Testament writings that deal with Christ's childhood, appeared at this point, along with the accounts of the Nativity in Matthew and Luke. "They could not be prefixed, however, to the original baptismal scene without an obvious discordance: if the sonship dated from the nativity, it could not at the baptism be announced as beginning 'this day': and so the phrase from the Messianic Psalm was removed; and in its place the prophetic Spirit supplied the fitter words, 'This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.'" This concept raised a host of questions for the mind trained in the learning of the Greeks, for to such a mind the difference between that which is divine and that which is not divine is the same as the difference between that which "ever is" and that which "comes and goes." Thus was the notion introduced that the sonship of Christ could not have had a beginning in mortal conditions but must be traceable to the pre-earth estate. The writers of scripture were said to have introduced the idea of his "'glory before the world was'; [in] an eternity 'in the bosom of the Father' [John 1:14,” that is, the doctrine that Christ obtained his divine nature even before the world was and only later became flesh. fn

 

The Apologists (Christian writers who, under the guise of defending the faith to the outside world, irreparably compromised it with Greek philosophy, c. 120-220), were all "ardent monotheists" and determined "at all costs" not to betray that principle. "The solution they proposed, reduced to essentials, was that, as preexistent, Christ was the Father's thought or mind, and that, as manifested in creation and revelation, He was its extrapolation or expression. In expounding this doctrine they had recourse to the imagery of the divine Logos, or Word, which had been familiar to later Judaism as well as to Stoicism, and which had become a fashionable cliché through the influence of Philo." fn Devoid of the Spirit of revelation, that Spirit essential to even the most fundamental understanding of the gospel declared by Christ, the Apologists commenced their "speculations and developed a science about Christ" called Christology, their great labor being "Logos Christology, from the Greek term logos, meaning 'the Word.'" The Logos notion was "a prominent concept in the prevailing Neo-Platonic philosophy of the time and so provided the theologians with a means of correlating the Christian revelation not only with the Old Testament but also with the insights of the classical philosophers." fn That is a kind way of saying they sold out. To cover the treachery of their deed, the argument of traditional Christianity was that the pagan philosophers were "Christians before Christianity" and so their philosophical speculations were more important than the writings of the Old Testament prophets, which those speculations were then used to reinterpret. fn

 

Thus with the aid of pagan philosophers, the Christian Apologists were able to discover that Jesus Christ was really just some kind of manifestation of the mind of a Christ in a mortal body. He was Logos, meaning "the intelligence or rational thought" of God. What he was not, in anything other than a metaphorical sense, was God's Son. Such a notion would require God to be a personal being and necessitate our accepting the language of the scriptures to mean what it says. Among other things it would suggest that God actually appeared to the prophets of the Old Testament and conversed with them as one man converses with another. But the Apologists found it "inconceivable that 'the Master and Father of all things should have abandoned all supercelestial affairs and made Himself visible in a minute corner of the world'." "Old Testament theophanies," their argument runs, are "in fact appearances of the Logos. God Himself cannot be contained in space and time, but it was precisely the function of the Word Whom He generated to manifest His mind and will in the created order." fn Thus Christ, or Logos, meaning some kind of intermediary expression of the mind of Deity, appeared to the Old Testament prophets. Again, how have we come to such an understanding? From Plato and his fellow philosophers, including the Jewish apologist Philo.

 

These events provided the setting for the famous Arian controversy which divided the Christian world for hundreds of years. "Arius [c. 250-c. 336] was incited to action by the teaching of Alexander the bishop of Alexandria, who taught the eternal generation of the Son," meaning that "'there never was a time when He was not.'" Arius countered with the argument that "as a father must exist before his son, therefore the Son of God did not exist eternally with the Father"; rather, "He was created [by the Father], but before time began. . . . The Council of Nicaea (a.d. 325), convened by the Emperor [Constantine]" to settle the issue, "decided against Arianism, and defined the authoritative doctrine to be that the Son is 'of one substance' (ousia) with the Father; that He was 'begotten, not made,' that 'there never was a time when He was not,' that 'He was not created.' The Nicene Creed was established largely by the brilliant advocacy of Athanasius, subsequently bishop of Alexandria," fn who argued "that reason must bow to the mystery of the Trinity." fn Thus a founding principle of Christianity, borrowed from Neoplatonism, became the tendency to make God as transcendent as possible. fn That is to say, in all things God transcends our ability to understand. "If you can understand it," Augustine explained, "it's not God." fn Thus in responding to Isaiah's question as it is recorded in the Septuagint, "Who shall explain His generation?" (LXX, Isaiah 53:8), the Christian world has responded: No one, for it is a grand mystery. fn

 

Will Durant, in his classic work Caesar and Christ, summarizes the early Christian era thus: "Christianity did not destroy paganism; it adopted it. The Greek mind, dying, came to a transmigrated life in the theology and liturgy of the Church; the Greek language, having reigned for centuries over philosophy, became the vehicle of Christian literature and ritual; the Greek mysteries passed down into the impressive mystery of the Mass. Other pagan cultures contributed to the syncretist result. From Egypt came the idea of a divine trinity, the Last Judgment, and a personal immortality of reward and punishment; from Egypt the adoration of the Mother and Child, and the mystic theosophy that made Neoplatonism and Gnosticism, and obscured the Christian creed; there, too, Christian monasticism would find its exemplars and its source. From Phrygia came the worship of the Great Mother; from Syria the resurrection drama of Adonis; from Thrace, perhaps, the cult of Dionysus, the dying and saving god. From Persia came millenarianism, the 'ages of the world,' the 'final conflagration,' the dualism of Satan and God, of Darkness and Light; already in the Fourth Gospel Christ is the 'Light shining in the darkness, and the darkness has never put it out.' The Mithraic ritual so closely resembled the eucharistic sacrifice of the Mass that Christian fathers charged the Devil with inventing these similarities to mislead frail minds. Christianity was the last great creation of the ancient pagan world." fn

 

 

(Watch and Be Ready: Preparing for the Second Coming of the Lord [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1994], 39.)

 

 

 

There was a great uproar in the Empire; they were divided by language, customs, doctrine etc.

 

Many doctrines came into the church that was not scriptural, but the people didn’t know it!

 

Non-Biblical Doctrines and Practices Developed
Within the Catholic Church

  • Monasticism - The church encouraged many to withdraw from society believing that in so doing they would be alone with God; men who practiced monasticism were called monks and woman were called nuns.
  • Celibacy - Monks, nuns, and priests believed they should not be married.
  • Praying to Mary or saints (deceased persons who were officially recognized by the church as holy) - They believed that Mary or the saints could stand before God on behalf of sinners.
  • Penance - Punishments which a repentant sinner had to undergo to show their sorrow for their sins.
  • Purgatory - The place after death where repentant sinners completed the portion of punishment for sins not completed while living.
  • Indulgences - A waiver from the pope that excused the sinner from doing penance and shortened the time one had to stay in purgatory.
  • Transubstantiation - The belief that elements of the Sacrament actually became the body and blood of Christ.
  • Infant baptism - The belief that infants must be baptized to overcome original sin.
  • Pilgrimages - Those who visited the Holy Land or visited holy churches with select religious relics were able to shorten their time in purgatory.

 

THE REFORMERS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

John Wycliffe  (c. 1330-1384)

  • Though he lived two hundred years before the Reformation, his beliefs and teachings closely match those of Luther, Calvin and other Reformers
  • Disagreed with transubstantiation
  • Translated the Bible into English
  • The Church expelled Wycliffe from his teaching position at Oxford.  
  • 44 years after he died, the Pope ordered his bones exhumed and burned. 

 

 John Huss (c. 1369-1414)

·         Selling of indulgences

·         Burned at the stake in 1414

   

Martin Luther (c. 1483-1546)

·         95 Thesis: Selling of indulgences, celibacy, monasticism, etc

 

 

  

  

John Calvin (1509-1564)

·         Sovereignty of God

·         Double predestination

·         Denigration of man

·         Elect

·         Visible and invisible church

·         Two Sacraments - Baptism and the Lord's Supper 

 

  

 

Jacob Arminius (1560-1609)

  • All who believe in Christ can be saved.
  • Atonement is universal, making it possible for all to be saved.
  • Man cannot be saved without the grace of God.
  • God's grace is not irresistible.

  

Synod of Dordt  (1618- 1619)

  • Met in the city of Dordrecht from November 1618-May 1619
  • General assembly of representatives from the Reformed churches in eight different countries, together with representatives of the Dutch churches
  • The purpose of the meeting was to settle a controversy that had arisen in the Dutch churches following the spread of Arminianism
  • Produced the TULIP Doctrines:

    T   Total depravity of man
    U   Unconditional election of those predestined to be saved
    L    Limited atonement for only the elect
    I     Irresistible grace for the elect
    P   Perseverance of those saved (not possible to fall from grace)

 

 

  The TULIP doctrines of Election, Grace, Justification and Sanctification came from Paul’s writings in Romans, Ephesians and Galatians.

 

Agency vs. Predestination

By John A. Tvedtnes

An area of disagreement among Christians is whether we humans have agency--and thus some measure of control over our salvation--or whether God has predestined our fate. The argument is not a new one and was also known in early Judaism as well as in medieval Islam. The problem is complicated by the fact that some scriptures and other early texts seem to suggest that God has given us agency, while others have been read as evidence for predestination.1

Augustine (354-430 A.D.), bishop of Hippo in North Africa, was the foremost Roman Catholic theologian of his time. From his reading of the Bible and in responding to various heretical teachings, he developed some of the basic teachings of western Christianity. He concluded that, as a result of Adam's fall, man is totally depraved and cannot do anything to save himself. Because of this depravity, man is even incapable of having faith in God and, consequently, no free will. This means that only God can save a human, which he does by arbitrarily giving faith to one while denying it to another. This led Augustine to believe that God predestined, before the creation of the world, who would be saved and who would be damned. Because man's fate has been predetermined, nothing he does can change things. The elect, predestined for salvation, cannot fall from grace, while those predestined for damnation cannot be saved even if they perform righteous deeds. Consequently, salvation comes only by grace as a free gift from God.2

Though Luther and other reformers taught predestination, John Calvin was its foremost proponent during the time of the Protestant Reformation.3 Many adherents of today's Protestant Evangelical movement lean heavily on Calvin, though not all Evangelical Christians believe in predestination. Calvinistic belief is expressed by the acronym TULIP, where each letter stands for one principle: Total depravity, Unconditional election, Limited atonement, Irresistible grace, and Perseverance of the saints.

We begin by looking at the implications of these concepts.

Total Depravity

The term suggests that the "original sin" of Adam and Eve has so tainted mankind that we would be lost forever without the atonement of Jesus Christ. Latter-day Saints agree with this concept. The Book of Mormon prophet Abinadi declared,

For they are carnal and devilish, and the devil has power over them; yea, even that old serpent that did beguile our first parents, which was the cause of their fall; which was the cause of all mankind becoming carnal, sensual, devilish, knowing evil from good, subjecting themselves to the devil. Thus all mankind were lost; and behold, they would have been endlessly lost were it not that God redeemed his people from their lost and fallen state. But remember that he that persists in his own carnal nature, and goes on in the ways of sin and rebellion against God, remaineth in his fallen state and the devil hath all power over him. Therefore, he is as though there was no redemption made, being an enemy to God; and also is the devil an enemy to God. And now if Christ had not come into the world, speaking of things to come as though they had already come, there could have been no redemption. (Mosiah 16:3-6; see also D&C 20:20-21)

Amulek repeated the concept, adding that repentance is necessary in order to qualify for salvation through Christ:

Therefore, as the soul could never die, and the fall had brought upon all mankind a spiritual death as well as a temporal, that is, they were cut off from the presence of the Lord, it was expedient that mankind should be reclaimed from this spiritual death. Therefore, as they had become carnal, sensual, and devilish, by nature, this probationary state became a state for them to prepare; it became a preparatory state. And now remember, my son, if it were not for the plan of redemption, (laying it aside) as soon as they were dead their souls were miserable, being cut off from the presence of the Lord. And now, there was no means to reclaim men from this fallen state, which man had brought upon himself because of his own disobedience; Therefore, according to justice, the plan of redemption could not be brought about, only on conditions of repentance of men in this probationary state, yea, this preparatory state; for except it were for these conditions, mercy could not take effect except it should destroy the work of justice. Now the work of justice could not be destroyed; if so, God would cease to be God. And thus we see that all mankind were fallen, and they were in the grasp of justice; yea, the justice of God, which consigned them forever to be cut off from his presence. And now, the plan of mercy could not be brought about except an atonement should be made; therefore God himself atoneth for the sins of the world, to bring about the plan of mercy, to appease the demands of justice, that God might be a perfect, just God, and a merciful God also. (Alma 42:9; see also Moses 5:13-15)

The brother of Jared prayed, "for we know that thou art holy and dwellest in the heavens, and that we are unworthy before thee; because of the fall our natures have become evil continually" (Ether 3:2). Jacob taught that without the atonement of Christ, we would "become devils, angels to a devil, to be shut out from the presence of our God" (2 Nephi 9:9; see also vs. 16), but, like Amulek, he stressed the importance of repentance in the process of salvation: "O my brethren, hearken unto my words; arouse the faculties of your souls; shake yourselves that ye may awake from the slumber of death; and loose yourselves from the pains of hell that ye may not become angels to the devil" (Jacob 3:11).

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints teaches "that men will be punished for their own sins, and not for Adam's transgression" (Article of Faith 2), but only because "through the atonement of Christ, all mankind may be saved, by obedience to the laws and ordinances of the Gospel" (Article of Faith 3). These laws and ordinances are defined in Article of Faith 4: "We believe that the first principles and ordinances of the Gospel are: first, Faith in the Lord Jesus Christ; second, Repentance; third, Baptism by immersion for the remission of sins; fourth, Laying on of hands for the gift of the Holy Ghost."

The sole exception to this scenario is children who have not yet reached the age of accountability and those whose mental abilities make them childlike. King Benjamin said,

And even if it were possible that little children could sin they could not be saved; but I say unto you they are blessed; for behold, as in Adam, or by nature, they fall, even so the blood of Christ atoneth for their sins. And moreover, I say unto you, that there shall be no other name given nor any other way nor means whereby salvation can come unto the children of men, only in and through the name of Christ, the Lord Omnipotent. For behold he judgeth, and his judgment is just; and the infant perisheth not that dieth in his infancy; but men drink damnation to their own souls except they humble themselves and become as little children, and believe that salvation was, and is, and is to come, in and through the atoning blood of Christ, the Lord Omnipotent. For the natural man is an enemy to God, and has been from the fall of Adam, and will be, forever and ever, unless he yields to the enticings of the Holy Spirit, and putteth off the natural man and becometh a saint through the atonement of Christ the Lord, and becometh as a child, submissive, meek, humble, patient, full of love, willing to submit to all things which the Lord seeth fit to inflict upon him, even as a child doth submit to his father. (Mosiah 3:16-19; see also Moroni 8:8-13)

From this, we learn that all of us, by accepting the atonement of Christ and submitting ourselves to him, can become childlike and thus indemnified by the blood of Christ from guilt. The risen Savior told the Nephites assembled in the city Bountiful, "And again I say unto you, ye must repent, and be baptized in my name, and become as a little child, or ye can in nowise inherit the kingdom of God" (3 Nephi 11:38).4

Unconditional Election

Calvin believed that God elects some people for salvation and chooses others for damnation, not based on any innate qualities of the individual, but does so out of his own divine will. Taken to the extreme, it means that one whom God chooses to save will be saved regardless of whether he is a good or evil person, while one destined for damnation will be damned even if he is righteous. The concept is expressed in the saying, "If you will or if you won't, you'll be damned if you do, you'll be damned if you don't."

This is where Latter-day Saints--and, indeed, most Christians--part company with Calvin. The concept of predestination suggests that God is capricious, saving or damning people at will, without regard to their righteous or sinful state. It makes Peter a liar when he declared, "Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons: But in every nation he that feareth him, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with him" (Acts 10:34-35), a concept subsequently taught by Paul (Romans 2:11; Ephesians 6:9). Indeed, Paul wrote "that of the Lord ye shall receive the reward of the inheritance: for ye serve the Lord Christ. But he that doeth wrong shall receive for the wrong which he hath done: and there is no respect of persons" (Colossians 3:24-25). The concept of predestination also contradicts the biblical teaching that "he that endureth to the end shall be saved" (Matthew 10:22; 24:13; Mark 13:13).

That full salvation is available to everyone but is given only to those who believe is suggested by Jesus' final instruction to the apostles: "Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature. He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned" (Mark 16:15-16). Note, too, Paul's statement in 1 Corinthians 1:21-24: "For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe. For the Jews require a sign, and the Greeks seek after wisdom: But we preach Christ crucified, unto the Jews a stumblingblock, and unto the Greeks foolishness; But unto them which are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God, and the wisdom of God."

Limited Atonement

According to Calvin, Christ died only for the elect. This is not to say that he died for the righteous for, as the Bible (and the Book of Mormon) teaches, all are sinners. One of the "proof texts" used to support the concept of limited atonement is John 10:11, 15, where Jesus noted that he would die for "the sheep." Another is Matthew 26:28, where he said that his blood "is shed for many for the remission of sins," suggesting that the atonement did not apply to everyone, only to "many." Similarly, Isaiah prophesied that Christ would bear the sins of "many," but not all (Isaiah 53:12).

The Book of Mormon also uses this term, saying of the Lamanites that "many of them will be saved, for the Lord will be merciful unto all who call on his name" (Alma 9:17; cf. D&C 100:17). Mormon explained the conditions of salvation as follows:

Therefore, blessed are they who will repent and hearken unto the voice of the Lord their God; for these are they that shall be saved. And may God grant, in his great fulness, that men might be brought unto repentance and good works, that they might be restored unto grace for grace, according to their works. And I would that all men might be saved. But we read that in the great and last day there are some who shall be cast out, yea, who shall be cast off from the presence of the Lord; Yea, who shall be consigned to a state of endless misery, fulfilling the words which say: They that have done good shall have everlasting life; and they that have done evil shall have everlasting damnation. (Helaman 12:23-26)

Other passages cited in support of the concept of a limited atonement are John 17:9 (where Jesus prayed for those given to him, not for the entire world) and Acts 20:28 (Christ purchased the Church, not all people). The narrow interpretation given such passages is contradicted by other New Testament writings. Peter wrote that God is "not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance" (2 Peter 3:9). Paul wrote that "our Saviour...will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth" (1 Timothy 2:3-4). Like Alma 9:17 (cited above), this suggests that salvation is available to all, though not all take advantage of Christ's atonement. Paul also wrote that "the grace of God that bringeth salvation hath appeared to all men, Teaching us that, denying ungodliness and worldly lusts, we should live soberly, righteously, and godly, in this present world" (Titus 2:11-12).

John the Baptist called Christ "the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world" (John 1:29), while the apostle John wrote that "he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world" (1 John 2:2).5 John also wrote that "God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved" (John 3:16-17). The apostle Paul told the Corinthians, "For the love of Christ constraineth us; because we thus judge, that if one died for all, then were all dead: And that he died for all, that they which live should not henceforth live unto themselves, but unto him which died for them, and rose again" (2 Corinthians 5:14-15). In verse 18, he noted that Christians are reconciled to God through Christ, while in verse 20, he admonished, "be ye reconciled to God," clearly showing that we must do something to take advantage of this reconciliation. In an earlier epistle to the Corinthian saints, Paul noted that one aspect of the atonement of Christ provides a resurrection for all men:

For since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead. For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive. But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ's at his coming. Then cometh the end, when he shall have delivered up the kingdom to God, even the Father; when he shall have put down all rule and all authority and power. (1 Corinthians 15:21-24)

Latter-day Saints believe that Christ's atonement overcame temporal (physical) death for all men, thus providing a resurrection for everyone, but that he provided salvation from spiritual death only for young children and for adults who choose to follow him (D&C 29:41-50). This view accommodates New Testament teachings about salvation for all or for the few, and it corresponds to Jesus' teaching about a universal resurrection:

"Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice, And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation" (John 5:28-29). Looking at it from another perspective, we learn from D&C 76 that all except the sons of perdition will be assigned to one of the three degrees of glory (D&C 76:43-44), so they are all saved from the devil.

In the Book of Mormon, Amulek explained that Christ

shall come into the world to redeem his people; and he shall take upon him the transgressions of those who believe on his name; and these are they that shall have eternal life, and salvation cometh to none else. Therefore the wicked remain as though there had been no redemption made, except it be the loosing of the bands of death; for behold, the day cometh that all shall rise from the dead and stand before God, and be judged according to their works. Now, there is a death which is called a temporal death; and the death of Christ shall loose the bands of this temporal death, that all shall be raised from this temporal death. The spirit and the body shall be reunited again in its perfect form; both limb and joint shall be restored to its proper frame, even as we now are at this time; and we shall be brought to stand before God, knowing even as we know now, and have a bright recollection of all our guilt. (Alma 11:40-43)

Irresistible Grace

Calvin held that when God calls his elect to salvation, they are unable to resist his free gift. The "external call" goes to all mankind, but the "internal call" from the Holy Spirit is intended only for those chosen to be saved and cannot be resisted. Among the passages cited in support of this concept is John 6:28-29, "Then said they unto him, What shall we do, that we might work the works of God? Jesus answered and said unto them, This is the work of God, that ye believe on him whom he hath sent." Calvinists read Jesus' words as evidence that faith in Christ is a gift to the elect. But Christ's response to the question "What shall we do" really is that we should believe in God, and that this is what God wants of us. It does not suggest that the elect can just go on in their sinful ways and expect that God will make them believe in his Son.

Some cite Philippians 2:13 ("For it is God which worketh in you both to will and to do of his good pleasure") as evidence that men have no free will. This latter passage, however, must be read in context with the verses that precede it, which indicate that it is God's desire

That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth; And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father. Wherefore, my beloved, as ye have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling. (Philippians 2:10-12)

Perhaps the strongest passage used in support of the concept of irresistible grace is found in Romans 9:16-24:

So then it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that sheweth mercy. For the scripture saith unto Pharaoh, Even for this same purpose have I raised thee up, that I might shew my power in thee, and that my name might be declared throughout all the earth. Therefore hath he mercy on whom he will have mercy, and whom he will he hardeneth. Thou wilt say then unto me, Why doth he yet find fault? For who hath resisted his will? Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus? Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour? What if God, willing to shew his wrath, and to make his power known, endured with much longsuffering the vessels of wrath fitted to destruction: And that he might make known the riches of his glory on the vessels of mercy, which he had afore prepared unto glory, Even us, whom he hath called, not of the Jews only, but also of the Gentiles?

This concept is also reflected in Isaiah 7:20 and 10:15, where the king of Assyria is said to be an instrument in the hands of the Lord in punishing wicked Israel. Latter-day Saints see this as an indication that God takes advantage of the actions of even the wicked (as in the case of Samson) to punish wrongdoers, but not that they have no will of their own. If God lies behind all of our acts, why would he chastise us for sins we have committed?

Latter-day Saints do not believe that grace is irresistible. D&C 20:32-34 declares, "But there is a possibility that man may fall from grace and depart from the living God; Therefore let the church take heed and pray always, lest they fall into temptation; Yea, and even let those who are sanctified take heed also." This is supported by the apostle Paul, who admonished his fellow Christians "That they do good, that they be rich in good works, ready to distribute, willing to communicate; Laying up in store for themselves a good foundation against the time to come, that they may lay hold on eternal life" (1 Timothy 6:18-19).

Perseverance of the Saints

Calvin reasoned that Christ's elect cannot lose their salvation. Since the Father elected, the Son redeemed, and the Holy Spirit applied salvation, those thus saved are eternally secure in Christ. Some of the verses cited for this position are:

  • John 10:27-28, where Jesus said his sheep "shall never perish." However, he defined his sheep as those who "follow me," suggesting that those who do not follow him do not have the same promise. Thus, mankind has free will.
  • John 6:47, where Jesus declared "He that believeth on me hath everlasting life." The real question here is how to read the word "believeth." Does it refer to all who profess a belief in Christ, or to those who demonstrate that belief by their actions. The Savior told his disciples "If ye love me, keep my commandments" (John 14:15; see also vs. 23). He also reworded it "If ye keep my commandments, ye shall abide in my love" (John 15:10). The apostle John, who preserved these words of Christ, also wrote, "For this is the love of God, that we keep his commandments" (1 John 5:3). Similarly, James wrote that "faith without works is dead" (James 2:20; see also vs. 17). Paul wrote, "I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand; By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain. For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures (1 Corinthians 15:1-3). Jude agreed, writing, "But ye, beloved, building up yourselves on your most holy faith, praying in the Holy Ghost, Keep yourselves in the love of God, looking for the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ unto eternal life" (Jude 1:20-21).
  • Romans 8:1, which declares that "them which are in Christ Jesus" are not condemned, suggesting to Calvinists that they are already saved. This interpretation ignores the fact that the verse then adds, "who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit," suggesting that only those who follow the promptings of the Spirit will partake of full salvation, i.e., they will be saved from spiritual death, which is total separation from God.
  • 1 Corinthians 10:13, which teaches that God "will not suffer you to be tempted above that ye are able; but will with the temptation also make a way to escape." The truth of this is undisputed, but one must also note the context of the passage. Verse 12 reads "Wherefore let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall," suggesting that one can, indeed, fall from grace. In verse 14, Paul wrote, "Wherefore, my dearly beloved, flee from idolatry." This clearly suggests that action on our part is necessary. To the Galatians, Paul wrote that Christians who performed circumcision were "fallen from grace" (Galatians 5:4). The Latter-day Saint belief is summed up in D&C 20:32-34: "But there is a possibility that man may fall from grace and depart from the living God; Therefore let the church take heed and pray always, lest they fall into temptation; Yea, and even let those who are sanctified take heed also."6
  • Philippians 1:6, which declares that God "hath begun a good work in you [and] will perform it until the day [second coming] of Jesus Christ." This is not a doctrinal assertion; rather, Paul wrote that he was "confident of this very thing." He was expressing his opinion, based on how the people conducted their lives. In verses 10-11, he admonished, "That ye may approve things that are excellent; that ye may be sincere and without offence till the day of Christ; Being filled with the fruits of righteousness, which are by Jesus Christ, unto the glory and praise of God."

In several New Testament passages, Christ spoke of those the Father had given him (Matthew 11:27; John 6:37-39, 44-45, 65; 10:26-29; 17:2, 11-12, 24; see also 3 Nephi 15:24; D&C 27:14; 50:41-42; 84:63). These seem, on the surface, to suggest predestination, but do they? In John 10:29, Christ referred to the Father giving him his sheep, but two verses earlier, he said, "My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me" (John 10:27), which suggests free will.

Earlier, Jesus said, "he that cometh to me shall never hunger; and he that believeth on me shall never thirst. But I said unto you, That ye also have seen me, and believe not. All that the Father giveth me shall come to me; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out" (John 6:35-37). Coming and believing again suggest free will, despite the fact that he speaks of the Father giving them. I suggest that when Christ said "that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father" (John 6:65), he was referring to the fact that only those who receive testimony of Christ from God truly come unto him. I further believe that this is what Paul had in mind when he wrote that "no man can say that Jesus is the Lord, but by the Holy Ghost" (1 Corinthians 12:3).

The Father's giving of people to Christ does not suggest that they were predestined to salvation, only that the Father gave Christ charge of them. If it meant predestination, then we must note that Christ himself declared that one of those given him by the Father had been lost: "Holy Father, keep through thine own name those whom thou hast given me, that they may be one, as we are. While I was with them in the world, I kept them in thy name: those that thou gavest me I have kept, and none of them is lost, but the son of perdition" (John 17:11-12).7 Jesus declared that it was "the Father's will...that of all which he hath given me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up again at the last day" (John 6:39), and yet he lost Judas. This demonstrates that "the Father's will" does not imply predestination, but only what he wants of us.

Some might object that Judas Iscariot was predestined to his fate, which begs the question of why the Father had given him to Christ. The case of Judas demonstrates that being given to Christ does not suggest predestination to salvation. Some suggest that the words "that the scripture might be fulfilled" at the end of verse 12 refers to Judas being predestined to fall, but we must again read the passage in context and note what scripture predicts this event. I suggest that the scripture being fulfilled is that Christ would be brought to trial and put to death (e.g., Isaiah 53). It would have happened by another means had Judas not chosen to betray him.

Calling and Election

The apostle Peter wrote, "Wherefore the rather, brethren, give diligence to make your calling and election sure: for if ye do these things, ye shall never fall: For so an entrance shall be ministered unto you abundantly into the everlasting kingdom of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ" (2 Peter 1:10-11). His stress on the "diligence" required to make one's calling and election sure suggests that salvation, while possible only through Christ's atonement, also depends on our own actions. In the verses that precede this statement, Peter explains what he means by "diligence":

And beside this, giving all diligence, add to your faith virtue; and to virtue knowledge; And to knowledge temperance; and to temperance patience; and to patience godliness; And to godliness brotherly kindness; and to brotherly kindness charity. For if these things be in you, and abound, they make you that ye shall neither be barren nor unfruitful in the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ. (2 Peter 1:5-8)

Peter's concept of calling and election seems to rely on Christ's statement that "many are called, but few are chosen" (Matthew 22:14; cf. Matthew 20:16; D&C 95:5; 121:34).8 Indeed, the Greek word rendered "calling" in Peter's epistle derives from the same verb used by Christ in Matthew's account and means "invite." Thus, the declaration in Matthew 22 is preceded by a parable comparing "the kingdom of heaven" to a king's banquet to which people were invited. The wealthy found excuses not to come and slew the king's messengers, so the king sent his servants to seek out the poor and others to attend the feast. One man, improperly dressed, was expelled and sent "into outer darkness" (Matthew 22:2-13). The parable clearly notes that all were invited into the kingdom, but some rejected the invitation, while others accepted. But even among the latter group, one had to be expelled. The parable clearly suggests that salvation depends on our coming to Christ, the king, meaning that we must take action on the invitation. We must also come properly "dressed" to the spiritual banquet. That one can be expelled from the blessed state made possible through Christ's atonement is suggested in Hebrews 6:4-6:

For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost, And have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come, If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame.

Commenting on Peter's exhortation to make one's calling and election sure, the prophet Joseph Smith said

Now, there is some grand secret here, and keys to unlock the subject. Notwithstanding the apostle exhorts them to add to their faith, virtue, knowledge, temperance, &c., yet he exhorts them to make their calling and election sure. And though they had heard an audible voice from heaven bearing testimony that Jesus was the Son of God [2 Peter 1:17-18], yet he says we have a more sure word of prophecy, whereunto ye do well that ye take heed as unto a light shining in a dark place [2 Peter 1:19]. Now, wherein could they have a more sure word of prophecy than to hear the voice of God saying, This is my beloved Son, &c. Now for the secret and grand key, Though they might hear the voice of God and know that Jesus was the Son of God, this would be no evidence that their election and calling was made sure, that they had part with Christ, and were joint heirs with Him. They then would want that more sure word of prophecy, that they were sealed in the heavens and had the promise of eternal life in the kingdom of God. (History of the Church 5:388)

Joseph further explained that "The more sure word of prophecy means a man's knowing that he is sealed up into eternal life by revelation and the spirit of prophecy, through the power of the holy priesthood" (History of the Church 5:392). He also declared, "We have no claim in our eternal compact, in relation to eternal things, unless our actions and contracts and all things tend to this end. But after all this, you have got to make your calling and election sure...1st key: Knowledge is the power of salvation. 2nd key: Make your calling and election sure. 3rd key: It is one thing to be on the mount and hear the excellent voice. &c., &c., and another to hear the voice declare to you, you have a part and lot in that kingdom" (History of the Church 5:403).

Predestination or Foreordination?

While some Christians use the term "predestination" in reference to what God has appointed to mortals, Latter-day Saints prefer the term "foreordination." The latter presumes the premortal existence of our spirits in the presence of the Father, who selected or foreordained some of those spirits to be his leaders on the earth (Abraham 3:21-28), of whom the chief was his beloved and divine son, who came to be known as Jesus Christ.9 To discuss the evidence for this premortal existence would detract from the theme of this article, so I simply note that, while many early Christian writers believed that the souls of man came into being at the time of birth, others taught that our spirits lived with God in a premortal realm. This concept is also known from early Jewish texts.

It is instructive to look at the views of some of the post-New Testament Church Fathers. For example, Justin Martyr (died 164 A.D.) wrote that God "foreknows that some are to be saved by repentance, some even that are perhaps not yet born" (First Apology 28).10 Divine foreknowledge, like foreordination of premortal spirits, need not imply predestination. Indeed, Justin believed in the agency of man:

But lest some suppose, from what has been said by us, that we say that whatever happens, happens by a fatal necessity, because it is foretold as known beforehand, this too we explain. We have learned from the prophets, and we hold it to be true, that punishments, and chastisements, and good rewards are rendered according to each man's actions. Since if it be not so, but all things happen by fate, neither is anything at all in our power. For if it be fated that this man, e.g., be good, and this other evil, neither is the former meritorious nor the latter to be blamed. And again, unless the human race have the power of avoiding evil and choosing good by free choice, they are not accountable for their actions, of whatever kind they be. But that it is by free choice they both walk uprightly and stumble, we thus demonstrate. We see the same man making a transition to opposite things. Now, if it had been fated that he were to be either good or bad, he could never have been capable of both the opposites, nor of so many transitions. But not even would some be good and others bad, since we thus make fate the cause of evil, and exhibit her as acting in opposition to herself; or that which has been already stated would seem to be true, that neither virtue nor vice is anything, but that things are only reckoned good or evil by opinion; which, as the true word shows, is the greatest impiety and wickedness. But this we assert is inevitable fate, that they who choose the good have worthy rewards, and they who choose the opposite have their merited awards. For not like other things, as trees and quadrupeds, which cannot act by choice, did God make man: for neither would he be worthy of reward or praise did he not of himself choose the good, but were created for this end; nor, if he were evil, would he be worthy of punishment, not being evil of himself, but being able to be nothing else than what he was made. And the holy Spirit of prophecy taught us this, telling us by Moses that God spoke thus to the man first created: 'Behold, before thy face are good and evil: choose the good.'11 And again, by the other prophet Isaiah, that the following utterance was made as if from God the Father and Lord of all: 'Wash you, make you clean; put away evils from your souls; learn to do well; judge the orphan, and plead for the widow; and come and let us reason together, saith the Lord: And if your sins be as scarlet, I will make them white as wool; and if they be red like as crimson, I will make them white as snow. And if ye be willing and obey Me, ye shall eat the good of the land; but if ye do not obey Me, the sword shall devour you: for the mouth of the Lord hath spoken it.'12 ... So that what we say about future events being foretold, we do not say it as if they came about by a fatal necessity; but God foreknowing all that shall be done by all men, and it being His decree that the future actions of men shall all be recompensed according to their several value, He foretells by the Spirit of prophecy that He will bestow meet rewards according to the merit of the actions done." (First Apology 43-44)13

John Cassian (ca. 360-435 A.D.), expressed the same idea, saying that

though each man's end is known beforehand to Him before his birth, yet somehow He so orders all things by a plan and method for all, and with regard to man's disposition, that He decides on everything not by the mere exercise of His power, nor according to the ineffable knowledge which His Prescience possesses, but according to the present actions of men, and rejects or draws to Himself each one, and daily either grants or withholds His grace. And that this is so the election of Saul also shows us, of whose miserable end the foreknowledge of God certainly could not be ignorant, and yet He chose him out of so many thousands of Israel and anointed him king, rewarding the then existing merits of his life, and not considering the sin of his coming fall, so that after he became reprobate, God complains almost in human terms and, with man's feelings, as if He repented of his choice, saying: "It repenteth Me that I have appointed Saul king: for he hath forsaken Me, and hath not performed My words;" and again: "But Samuel was grieved for Saul because the Lord repented that He had made Saul king over Israel." (Second Conference of Abbot Joseph 25)14

Eusebius, bishop of Caesarea, in Preparation of the Gospel 6.10, included a lengthy discussion of unusual customs found among various peoples, in an effort to demonstrate that it is custom, not fate that determines these acts. Of particular importance is how people die in various cultures, especially the elderly, who are sometimes exposed to dogs or birds and, in some cases, sacrificed. In 6.11, he favorably cited Origen, who described astrology as practiced in various nations and noted that

the consequence for those who hold these doctrines is that they utterly destroy our free-will, and therefore also both praise and blame, and commendable, or on the other hand blame-able actions.

But if this is the case, there is an end of the proclaimed judgement of God, and of threatenings against sinners that they should be punished; also, on the other hand, of the privileges and beatitudes promised to those who have devoted themselves to the better life: for none of these things will any longer have a good reason for their occurrence.

Also if any one would look at the consequences to himself of the doctrines he holds, (he would see that) both his faith will be vain, and Christ's advent of no avail, and all the dispensation of law and prophets, and the labours of the Apostles to establish the churches of God through Christ.15

Calvin acknowledged that of the early Church Fathers, "Ambrose, Origen, and Jerome, were of opinion, that God dispenses his grace among men according to the use which he foresees that each will make of it. It may be added, that Augustine also was for some time of this opinion; but after he had made greater progress in the knowledge of Scripture, he not only retracted it as evidently false, but powerfully confuted it."16 From a Latter-day Saint perspective, Augustine introduced more false doctrine into Christianity than anyone before his time and the concept of predestination is as fallacious as other such notions that he penned. We maintain that the Bible is a more reliable source of sound doctrine, and shall return to the subject later in this paper.

Names Written in Heaven

The scriptures inform us that there is a "book of remembrance" or "book of life" in heaven in which the names of the righteous are written (Malachi 3:16-18; Revelation 13:8; 17:8).17 Christ declared that the names of the seventy disciples he had chosen were "written in heaven" (Luke 10:20). Some might take such passages as evidence for predestination, but this argument fails when one reads that the Lord blots out the names of the wicked from the heavenly book (Deuteronomy 9:14; 29:19-20; Psalm 69:28; 2 Kings 14:27; Revelation 3:5; Alma 5:57-58).18 The scriptures are clear that if one whose name is written in the book of life falls into sin, the Lord removes that person's name from the book. Consequently, there is no predetermination for eternal life; God ordains that gift for all of his children, but removes them from the list when they sin.

When the Israelites sinned with the golden calf, Moses pleaded with the Lord, "Yet now, if thou wilt forgive their sin--; and if not, blot me, I pray thee, out of thy book which thou hast written. And the Lord said unto Moses, Whosoever hath sinned against me, him will I blot out of my book" (Exodus 32:32-33).

Noting Moses' plea, John Cassian (ca. 360-435 A.D.) wrote that "Judas [Iscariot]...killed himself by hanging, that he might not after his name was blotted out be converted and repent19 and deserve to be once more written among the righteous in heaven. We must therefore not doubt that at the time when he was chosen by Christ and obtained a place in the Apostolate, the name of Judas was written in the book of the living, and that he heard as well as the rest the words: 'Rejoice not because the devils are subject unto you, but rejoice because your names are written in heaven' [Luke 10:20]. But...he was corrupted by the plague of covetousness and had his name struck out from that heavenly list."20

A Survey of New Testament Passages

A number of Bible passages are used as proof-texts to demonstrate the concept of predestination. Here, we examine each to see how they should be read in context and provide evidence that they can be used to support the concept of foreordination rather than predestination.

John 1:12-13

"But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God."

All Christians, including Latter-day Saints, acknowledge that salvation comes only through Christ, who declared that he came to do the will of his Father (John 5:30). Without Christ's atonement, none of our good works would be sufficient to save us. It is, therefore, the will of God that provides salvation but, as noted in verse 12, we must first believe on the name of Christ and accept this gift.21

John 15:16

"Ye have not chosen me, but I have chosen you, and ordained you, that ye should go and bring forth fruit, and that your fruit should remain: that whatsoever ye shall ask of the Father in my name, he may give it you."

Calvin cited this as one of his evidences for predestination, saying that Christ "not only excludes past merits, but declares that they had nothing in themselves for which they could be chosen except in so far as his mercy anticipated."22 Latter-day Saints, however, see this as a reference only to the twelve apostles, whom Christ chose as his leaders.23 Because the Savior added, "I have chosen you out of the world" (verse 19), the choice in question was made in mortality. The concept is akin to Hebrews 5:4, which describes callings to the priesthood, saying, "And no man taketh this honour unto himself, but he that is called of God, as was Aaron" (see also Article of Faith 5).

Acts 2:23

"Him, being delivered by the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God, ye have taken, and by wicked hands have crucified and slain"

It is interesting that this passage makes Christ the object of God's foreknowledge. From numerous passages, mostly in the gospel account of John, we learn that the Savior accepted the Father's will concerning him. (This is particularly true of his suffering and death, as we read in Luke 22:42.) We, too, can make the decision to obey God, though we can never in mortality be as perfect as Christ.

Acts 2:39

"For the promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, even as many as the Lord our God shall call."

Taken in isolation, this verse seems to be suggesting that God calls people to salvation. Indeed, this does happen when one makes his/her calling and election sure, as was discussed earlier in this paper. But one must read this verse in the context of the two preceding verses, Acts 2:37-38:

Now when they heard this, they were pricked in their heart, and said unto Peter and to the rest of the apostles, Men and brethren, what shall we do? Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.

Peter's audience asked him what they must "do," and Peter told them to "repent, and be baptized." If they were already consigned to salvation, why would they have to "do" anything?

Acts 2:47

"And the Lord added to the church daily such as should be saved."

The unfortunate use of the expression "should be saved" suggests to some readers predestination, but this is not reflected in the Greek text, which refers to "those being saved." So people were being saved by joining the Church. This verse must be read in conjunction with verse 41 of the same chapter, which declares that "Then they that gladly received his word were baptized: and the same day there were added unto them about three thousand souls." Does the fact that God "was adding" them in verse 47 suggest that he had predestined them to be saved? The text does not so state, but it is clear from verses 37-41 that Peter admonished the assembled listeners to "repent and be baptized," and that those who did so were added to the Church. They were saved because God forgave them when their sins were symbolically washed away in the waters of baptism.

Acts 13:48

"And when the Gentiles heard this, they were glad, and glorified the word of the Lord: and as many as were ordained to eternal life believed."

In his revision of the Bible, Joseph Smith reworded the last part to read, "as many as believed were ordained unto eternal life," which fits better with the concept of free will. The context of the passage also argues against the concept of predestination. Verses 46-47 describe how Paul and Barnabas gave the word of God to the Jews of Pisidian Antioch, who willingly rejected it and became thereby "unworthy of everlasting life," causing the apostles to "turn to the Gentiles" with their message of salvation. It is ironic that throughout the Bible, God's chosen people are Israelites, while here the Israelites are deemed unworthy and are replaced by Gentiles. If God predestines individuals for eternal life or damnation, why did he not cause these believing Gentiles to be born Israelites? If all is determined beforehand, why does God change his tactic at this juncture?24

Acts 17:26

"[God] hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation."

Paul's statement is based on Deuteronomy 32:8, where we read that "the most High divided to the nations their inheritance...[and] set the bounds of the people."25 Taken by itself, the passage suggests that God determined the boundaries of the nations. From many historical records, we know that this determination was not eternal in nature, for some nations fell while others arose both anciently and in modern times. Indeed, Deuteronomy 19:8-9 allows for the borders of Israel to be expanded.26

Romans 8:28-30

"And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose. For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren. Moreover whom he did predestinate, them he also called: and whom he called, them he also justified: and whom he justified, them he also glorified."

Latter-day Saints would see this as reference to the fact that we accepted Christ as our Savior in the premortal council. The Greek term rendered "predestinate" means to "appoint, determine, ordain beforehand." While most English Bibles rendered it "predestined," others use terms such as "foreordained," "fore-appointed," "before-ordained," or "chosen." That the passage does not refer to predestination is suggested by the verses that immediately precede it (26-27), where we read that "the Spirit itself maketh intercession for us," and by verse 34, which says that "Christ...also maketh intercession for us." If one is already chosen for either salvation or damnation, why would there be a need for intercession?

As for those "who are the called," we must note that Christ declared that "many be called, but few chosen" (Matthew 20:16). In Matthew 22:14, he used the same verbiage in connection with those who do not accept the king's call. This suggests that one must heed the call in order to be chosen. Paul admonished the Thessalonians to "walk worthy of God, who hath called you unto his kingdom and glory" (1 Thessalonians 2:12). Though they had already been called, they needed to do something to be "worthy of God."

Romans 9:10-12

"And not only this; but when Rebecca also had conceived by one, even by our father Isaac; (For the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth;) It was said unto her, The elder shall serve the younger. As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated."

The Greek word rendered "election" in verse 11 means "choice." What we have here is merely God's choice of Jacob over Esau to receive the birthright. Those who believe in predestination generalize from a specific case, while others would see this as one more example that human beings had a premortal existence in which some were foreordained to certain tasks on the earth. Moreover, verse 13 cites Malachi 1:2-3 ("yet I loved Jacob, and I hated Esau"), written many centuries after the time of Esau and therefore is not evidence for God "hating" Esau prior to his birth.

Romans 9:15-18

"For he saith to Moses, I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion. So then it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that sheweth mercy. For the scripture saith unto Pharaoh, Even for this same purpose have I raised thee up, that I might shew my power in thee, and that my name might be declared throughout all the earth. Therefore hath he mercy on whom he will have mercy, and whom he will he hardeneth."

Verse 15 cites Exodus 33:19, "I...will be gracious to whom I will be gracious, and will shew mercy on whom I will shew mercy." Ultimately, it is God who will judge each of us. Without the mercy available through the atonement of Christ, no amount of good deeds can bring us mercy. Only the Lord can know our hearts and judge according to his standards, not ours. This does not mean that he predestines salvation for some and damnation for others.

Though verse 17 speaks of the pharaoh of the exodus (citing Exodus 9:16), it could just as easily apply to the kings of Assyria and Babylon by which, according to Isaiah, the Lord would punish Israel. Regarding the Assyrian king, the Lord told Isaiah, "I will send him against an hypocritical nation, and against the people of my wrath will I give him a charge, to take the spoil, and to take the prey, and to tread them down like the mire of the streets. Howbeit he meaneth not so, neither doth his heart think so; but [it is] in his heart to destroy and cut off nations not a few" (Isaiah 10:6-7). Note the beginning of verse 7, in which the Lord states, "Howbeit he meaneth not so, neither doth his heart think so." From this and what follows, we see that the Assyrian king was doing his own will but that the Lord was taking advantage of his actions to punish Israel. Had the Lord not wanted Israel to be punished for their sins, he could have protected them against the Assyrians, and, indeed, he ultimately took action by sending an angel to attack the Assyrian camp while they were besieging Jerusalem (2 Kings 19:35-36; Isaiah 37:36-37).

Romans 9:20-23

"Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus? Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour? What if God, willing to shew his wrath, and to make his power known, endured with much longsuffering the vessels of wrath fitted to destruction: And that he might make known the riches of his glory on the vessels of mercy, which he had afore prepared unto glory."

Verse 22 seems on the surface to be evidence for predestination, but it doesn't say that it was God who made them "fit for destruction." We would say it was their own sins that called for their destruction. As for verse 23, the words "afore prepared" doesn't suggest a determination made in the very beginning; it could refer to any time before God takes action. In verse 24, Paul says that it is the Christians whom God called from among the Jews and others. Paul's point is not predestination, but acceptance of the call after the original chosen people (the Jews) rejected Christ.

The early Christian theologian Origen (185-253 A.D.), commenting on this passage, wrote:

Some one will perhaps say, that as the potter out of the same lump makes some vessels to honour, and others to dishonour [Romans 9:18-21], so God creates some men for perdition and others for salvation; and that it is not therefore in our own power either to be saved or to perish; by which reasoning we appear not to be possessed of free-will. We must answer those who are of this opinion with the question, Whether it is possible for the apostle to contradict himself? And if this cannot be imagined of an apostle, how shall he appear, according to them, to be just in blaming those who committed fornication in Corinth, or those who sinned, and did not repent of their unchastity, and fornication, and uncleanness, which they had committed? How, also, does he greatly praise those who acted rightly, like the house of Onesiphorus, saying, 'The Lord give mercy to the house of Onesiphorus; for he oft refreshed me, and was not ashamed of my chain: but, when he had come to Rome, he sought me out very diligently, and found me. The Lord grant unto him that he may find mercy of the Lord in that day.' [2 Timothy 1:16-18] Now it is not consistent with apostolic gravity to blame him who is worthy of blame, i.e., who has sinned, and greatly to praise him who is deserving of praise for his good works; and again, as if it were in no one's power to do any good or evil, to say that it was the Creator's doing that every one should act virtuously or wickedly, seeing He makes one vessel to honour, and another to dishonour. And how can he add that statement, 'We must all stand before the judgment-seat of Christ, that every one of us may receive in his body, according to what he hath done, whether it be good or bad?' [2 Corinthis 5:10] For what reward of good will be conferred on him who could not commit evil, being formed by the Creator to that very end? Or what punishment will deservedly be inflicted on him who was unable to do good in consequence of the creative act of [p. 324 end] his Maker? Then, again, how is not this opposed to that other declaration elsewhere, that 'in a great house there are not only vessels of gold and silver, but also of wood and of earth, and some to honour, and some to dishonour. If a man therefore purge himself from these, he shall be a vessel unto honour, sanctified, and meet for the Master's use, prepared unto every good work.' [2 Timothy 2:20-21] He, accordingly, who purges himself, is made a vessel unto honour, while he who has disdained to cleanse himself from his impurity is made a vessel unto dishonour. From such declarations, in my opinion, the cause of our actions can in no degree be referred to the Creator. For God the Creator makes a certain vessel unto honour, and other vessels to dishonour; but that vessel which has cleansed itself from all impurity He makes a vessel unto honour, while that which has stained itself with the filth of vice He makes a vessel unto dishonour. The conclusion from which, accordingly, is this, that the cause of each one's actions is a pre-existing one; and then every one, according to his deserts, is made by God either a vessel unto honour or dishonour. Therefore every individual vessel has furnished to its Creator out of itself the causes and cocasions of tis being formed by Him to be either a vessel unto honour or one unto dishonour. And if the assertion appear correct, as it certainly is, and in harmony with all piety, that it is due to previous causes that every vessel be prepared by God either to honour or to dishonour, it does not appear absurd that, in discussing remoter causes in the same order, and in the same method, we should come to the same conclusion respecting the nature of souls, and (believe) that this was the reason why Jacob was beloved before he was born into this world, and Esau hated, while he still was contained in the womb of his mother. (De Principiis 3.1.20)27

Romans 11:2-6

"God hath not cast away his people which he foreknew. Wot ye not what the scripture saith of Elias? how he maketh intercession to God against Israel, saying, Lord, they have killed thy prophets, and digged down thine altars; and I am left alone, and they seek my life. But what saith the answer of God unto him? I have reserved to myself seven thousand men, who have not bowed the knee to the image of Baal. Even so then at this present time also there is a remnant according to the election of grace. And if by grace, then is it no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace. But if it be of works, then is it no more grace: otherwise work is no more work."

God foreknew us in the premortal world. The grace by which we are saved comes from God and without that grace no amount of works could save us. Here, as in other passages, Paul contrasts the grace that comes through the atonement of Christ with the works of the law of Moses, as I discussed in my article " Salvation by Grace Alone?"

1 Corinthians 1:8-9

"Who shall confirm you unto the end, that ye may be blameless in the day of our Lord Jesus Christ. God is faithful, by whom ye were called unto the fellowship of his Son Jesus Christ our Lord."

While some may see this passage as suggesting that our eternal destiny has been determined in advance by God, Latter-day Saints consider this passage to be describing what is called "making your calling and election sure," described earlier. All who have heard the gospel message have been called to Christ and many have heeded that call, but not everyone has yet been selected to inherit the celestial kingdom. Note that the scripture uses the future tense ("shall confirm") rather than the past, suggesting that one's place in the eternal scheme has not yet been fixed.

1 Corinthians 1:21-29

"For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe. For the Jews require a sign, and the Greeks seek after wisdom: But we preach Christ crucified, unto the Jews a stumblingblock, and unto the Greeks foolishness. But unto them which are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God, and the wisdom of God. Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men; and the weakness of God is stronger than men. For ye see your calling, brethren, how that not many wise men after the flesh, not many noble, are called: But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty. And base things of the world, and things which are despised, hath God chosen, yea, and things which are not, to bring to nought things that are: That no flesh should glory in his presence."

Depending on one's perspective, this passage can be read in various ways. To those who acknowledge God's predestination, it would mean that God choses primarily the poor, the weak, and the unlearned to be saved. Others might suggest that God deliberately makes those destined for salvation poor, weak, or unlearned. Latter-day Saints, however, believe that those who are humble are more open to receiving the message of the gospel. Laboring among the Zoramites, Alma and his fellow missionaries found that the poor were more receptive to their message because they were despised by the rich and hence had been humbled by them. To them, Alma said,

I say unto you, it is well that ye are cast out of your synagogues, that ye may be humble, and that ye may learn wisdom; for it is necessary that ye should learn wisdom; for it is because that ye are cast out, that ye are despised of your brethren because of your exceeding poverty, that ye are brought to a lowliness of heart; for ye are necessarily brought to be humble. And now, because ye are compelled to be humble blessed are ye; for a man sometimes, if he is compelled to be humble, seeketh repentance; and now surely, whosoever repenteth shall find mercy; and he that findeth mercy and endureth to the end the same shall be saved. And now, as I said unto you, that because ye were compelled to be humble ye were blessed, do ye not suppose that they are more blessed who truly humble themselves because of the word? Yea, he that truly humbleth himself, and repenteth of his sins, and endureth to the end, the same shall be blessed--yea, much more blessed than they who are compelled to be humble because of their exceeding poverty. Therefore, blessed are they who humble themselves without being compelled to be humble; or rather, in other words, blessed is he that believeth in the word of God, and is baptized without stubbornness of heart, yea, without being brought to know the word, or even compelled to know, before they will believe. (Alma 32:12-16)

King Benjamin declared that "the natural man is an enemy to God, and has been from the fall of Adam, and will be, forever and ever, unless he yields to the enticings of the Holy Spirit, and putteth off the natural man and becometh a saint through the atonement of Christ the Lord, and becometh as a child, submissive, meek, humble, patient, full of love, willing to submit to all things which the Lord seeth fit to inflict upon him, even as a child doth submit to his father" (Mosiah 3:19). The Savior himself taught, "Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven. Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, the same is greatest in the kingdom of heaven" (Matthew 18:3-4). Though there is no salvation without Christ's atonement, only he who "shall humble himself" can "enter into the kingdom of heaven." There is no hint of predestination in 1 Corinthians 1.

1 Corinthians 2:6-9

"Howbeit we speak wisdom among them that are perfect: yet not the wisdom of this world, nor of the princes of this world, that come to nought. But we speak the wisdom of God in a mystery, even the hidden wisdom, which God ordained before the world unto our glory: Which none of the princes of this world knew: for had they known it, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory. But as it is written, Eye hath seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him."

The word "perfect" may suggest to some that God has thus made those destined for eternal life, but the passage does not say how they became "perfect." Elsewhere, the apostle Paul wrote that "all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God; Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus" (Romans 3:23-24). Clearly, perfection can only come through Christ's atonement, but we learn from other Bible passages that we need to exercise faith, repent of our sins, be baptized, and receive the Holy Ghost in order to receive all the blessings of that atonement. (See the discussion in another of my FAIR articles, " Salvation by Grace Alone?" The rich young man who had kept all the commandments asked the Savior "What lack I yet?" whereupon Christ replied, "If thou wilt be perfect, go and sell that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come and follow me" (Matthew 19:20-21). From this, we learn that the Lord expects us to do something in order to be perfected.

The real point of Paul's discussion in 1 Corinthians 2 is that God established before the world rewards for "them that love him," not that he arbitrarily decided beforehand which of us would receive those rewards. God wants all of us to be thus rewarded, but only grants this to those who are "transformed by the renewing of [their] mind" (Romans 12:2).

1 Corinthians 2:7 is not the only Pauline epistle to note that God ordained salvation "before the world." In 2 Timothy 1:9, he wrote that the Lord "hath saved us, and called us with an holy calling, not according to our works, but according to his own purpose and grace, which was given us in Christ Jesus before the world began," while in Titus 1:2 he wrote of the "hope of eternal life, which God, that cannot lie, promised before the world began." While some readers might consider such passages as evidence of predestination, Latter-day Saints see them in the context of the premortal council in which the plan of salvation was laid out for all of us before we came to the earth. Thus, in D&C 121:32, we read of "that which was ordained in the midst of the Council of the Eternal God of all other gods before this world was, that should be reserved unto the finishing and the end thereof, when every man shall enter into his eternal presence and into his immortal rest." Similarly, we read of "those things which were from the beginning before the world was, which were ordained of the Father, through his Only Begotten Son, who was in the bosom of the Father, even from the beginning" (D&C 76:13).

2 Corinthians 1:21-22

"Now he which establisheth us with you in Christ, and hath anointed us, is God; Who hath also sealed us, and given the earnest of the Spirit in our hearts."

Though some modern translations use the word "guarantees" in place of KJV "stablisheth," the passage does not imply that God's actions predate our coming to earth. Paul's audience consisted of people who had already accepted his message, had been baptized and, as he notes, had received the Spirit. The Greek word rendered "earnest" has the same meaning as English "earnest money," i.e., a down-payment with a promise of more to come.

2 Corinthians 5:5

"Now he that hath wrought us for the selfsame thing is God, who also hath given unto us the earnest of the Spirit."

This passage must be read in the same sense as the one cited before it, both of which speak of the "earnest of the Spirit," which one receives after baptism. There is no hint of predestination here.

Ephesians 1:3-5, 9, 11

"Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who hath blessed us with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ: According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love: Having predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himself, according to the good pleasure of his will... Having made known unto us the mystery of his will, according to his good pleasure which he hath purposed in himself... In whom also we have obtained an inheritance, being predestinated according to the purpose of him who worketh all things after the counsel of his own will."

Latter-day Saints see this as referring to the fact that we accepted the plan of salvation in our premortal existence "before the foundation of the world." This is what is meant by "heavenly places," where we first accepted Christ as our Redeemer. We who followed the Savior in our premortal state were selected by God to come to earth according to his plan, while those who rejected Christ and followed the devil were expelled and deprived of the privilege of obtaining a physical body.

Ephesians 1:13-14

"In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise, Which is the earnest of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession, unto the praise of his glory."

Here, again, we have the "earnest" (down-payment) that we saw in 2 Corinthians 1:22; 5:5, coupled with the Holy Spirit by which the promises are made sure. But this does not imply predestination.

1 Thessalonians 1:4

"Knowing, brethren beloved, your election of God."

The Greek term rendered "election" means "selection, choice." The passage does not imply that the choice was made before one's mortal birth. Indeed, Paul was writing to people who had, by his time, become Christians, noted for their "work of faith, and labour of love, and patience of hope in our Lord Jesus Christ" (verse 3) and who were "ensamples to all that believe in Macedonia and Achaia" (verse 7).

1 Thessalonians 4:7

"For God hath not called us unto uncleanness, but unto holiness."

As elsewhere, we learn that God calls people, but the passage does not suggest that this call is arbitrary. Indeed, in the verses preceding the one cited here, Paul reminds his readers of the "commandments we gave you by the Lord Jesus" and warns them of sexual promiscuity, saying, "For this is the will of God, even your sanctification, that ye should abstain from fornication" (verse 3). Thus, God wills that we be sanctified, but it cannot happen if we do not abandon sin.

1 Thessalonians 5:9

"For God hath not appointed us to wrath, but to obtain salvation by our Lord Jesus."

A superficial reading of this passage by those who maintain that God has already determined our fate is not justified when one reads the passage in context. Writing to those who had already taken the first steps toward salvation by believing in Christ and becoming members of his flock, Paul admonished, "but let us watch and be sober" (verse 6), "putting on the breastplate of faith and love; and for an helmet, the hope of salvation" (verse 8). Verse 9 merely suggests that God wants us to be saved through Christ and not suffer punishment. This view is also reflected in the Lord's words to the prophet Ezekiel: "Cast away from you all your transgressions, whereby ye have transgressed; and make you a new heart and a new spirit: for why will ye die, O house of Israel? For I have no pleasure in the death of him that dieth, saith the Lord God: wherefore turn yourselves, and live ye" (Ezekiel 18:31-32). Similarly, the apostle James wrote, "Brethren, if any of you do err from the truth, and one convert him; Let him know, that he which converteth the sinner from the error of his way shall save a soul from death, and shall hide a multitude of sins" (James 5:19-20).

1 Thessalonians 5:23-24

"And the very God of peace sanctify you wholly; and I pray God your whole spirit and soul and body be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. Faithful is he that calleth you, who also will do it."

Again, we note that the Lord calls humans and that eternal life of both body and spirit depends on Christ's atonement. A predestinationist would read the words "will do it" as suggestive that God will, in fact, preserve Christians blameless, but that is not what the text says. Paul wrote that this is what he was praying for, not that it was an absolute. If God has already chosen who will be saved and who will be damned, prayers could have no effect on the outcome.

2 Thessalonians 1:11-12

"Wherefore also we pray always for you, that our God would count you worthy of this calling, and fulfil all the good pleasure of his goodness, and the work of faith with power: That the name of our Lord Jesus Christ may be glorified in you, and ye in him, according to the grace of our God and the Lord Jesus Christ."

As with the previous passage from his first epistle to the Thessalonians, Paul again notes that the brethren prayed for Christians that God might consider them worthy of his "this calling." They had been called to Christ, but had not yet been chosen.

2 Thessalonians 2:11-15

"And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness. But we are bound to give thanks alway to God for you, brethren beloved of the Lord, because God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth: Whereunto he called you by our gospel, to the obtaining of the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ. Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle."

One who believes in predestination would read the words "from the beginning" as suggestive that all those who are destined to be saved were selected at the time denoted as "the beginning" in Genesis 1:1, i.e., the creation of the world. But Paul wrote that those "chosen...to salvation" were thus selected "through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth," i.e., they had come to believe and received the Spirit. To these, they had been "called...by our gospel." The term "gospel" means "good news," and "our gospel" must refer to the good news preached by Paul and his companions. Hence, "the beginning" alludes to when these converts to Christ received the message Paul brought to them.

Elsewhere, Paul wrote "For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved. How then shall they call on him in whom they have not believed? And how shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard? And how shall they hear without a preacher? And how shall they preach, except they be sent?" (Romans 10:13-15). His words suggest that salvation depends on hearing the gospel message and accepting it. Indeed, they reflect Jesus' words to the apostles just prior to his ascension: "Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature. He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned" (Mark 16:15-16). None of this suggests predestination of some to salvation and of others to damnation.

2 Timothy 1:9-10

"Who hath saved us, and called us with an holy calling, not according to our works, but according to his own purpose and grace, which was given us in Christ Jesus before the world began, But is now made manifest by the appearing of our Saviour Jesus Christ, who hath abolished death, and hath brought life and immortality to light through the gospel"

This passage informs us that God exercised his grace toward us in the premortal world, when Christ was assigned the responsibility of bringing about the atonement. Our Savior "abolished death" for all of humanity, thus providing a resurrection for all who were born into mortality. This is the salvation that requires no "works" on our part, for both the righteous and the wicked will be resurrected (John 5:29). "For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive" (1 Corinthians 15:22). Salvation by resurrection overcomes the physical death that came into the world through the fall of Adam and Eve. Our first parents also suffered a spiritual death, being cut off from the presence of God. Christ overcame this death, too, but only for those who willingly submit to his conditions for the spiritual salvation that brings us back into the presence of God (see D&C 29:40-49; 2 Nephi 9:10-13; Alma 12:16; 42:2-16).

2 Timothy 2:19

"Nevertheless the foundation of God standeth sure, having this seal, The Lord knoweth them that are his."

Though some believers in predestination may not see this as evidence for their view, Calvin cited this passage in support of the idea. It is more readily understood as God knowing which members of his Church are truly striving to do his will.

Titus 3:4-7

But after that the kindness and love of God our Saviour toward man appeared, Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost; Which he shed on us abundantly through Jesus Christ our Saviour; That being justified by his grace, we should be made heirs according to the hope of eternal life.

While Paul wrote that we are justified by divine grace, he also notes the necessity of baptism by water ("washing") and "the Holy Ghost." Throughout the scriptures, the Lord stresses that we will be judged by our works, but the atonement of Christ did not come "by works of righteousness which we have done, but [by] his mercy." Indeed, Christ suffered and died for us because we were sinners, not because we earned salvation by good works. God foreknew that we would fall into sin, so he provided the atonement to enable us to acknowledge the gift of mercy and turn from wickedness. Consequently, being saved by the grace of Christ does not imply that we are predestined to salvation or damnation, only that the gift of the atonement, as a means of rescue, was provided for all who would grasp it.

1 Peter 1:2

"Elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through sanctification of the Spirit, unto obedience and sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ: Grace unto you, and peace, be multiplied."

Latter-day Saints acknowledge God's foreknowledge but do not see this passage as evidence for predestination in the sense that it does away with free will. Alma wrote of ancient high priests who were "called and prepared from the foundation of the world according to the foreknowledge of God, on account of their exceeding faith and good works; in the first place being left to choose good or evil; therefore they having chosen good, and exercising exceedingly great faith, are called with a holy calling, yea, with that holy calling which was prepared with, and according to, a preparatory redemption for such" (Alma 13:3; see also verse 7). We therefore believe that, as spirits in a premortal world, we were allowed to choose between God's plan and that of Satan and that from those who accepted the plan that Christ save them and bring them back to the Father, God chose leaders who would implement his plan in mortality.

The apostle Peter wrote of Christ "Who verily was foreordained before the foundation of the world, but was manifest in these last times for you (1 Peter 1:20). The Greek term rendered "foreordained "means "foreknown," which is the way the New English Translation Bible translates it. Since all Christians would acknowledge that Christ had an actual premortal existence, should we not be able to suppose that God's foreknowledge of mortals also suggests that they existed before coming to the earth?

1 Peter 2:6-8

"Wherefore also it is contained in the scripture, Behold, I lay in Sion a chief corner stone, elect, precious: and he that believeth on him shall not be confounded. Unto you therefore which believe he is precious: but unto them which be disobedient, the stone which the builders disallowed, the same is made the head of the corner, And a stone of stumbling, and a rock of offence, even to them which stumble at the word, being disobedient: whereunto also they were appointed."

Predestinationists consider the words at the end of verse 8 ("whereunto also they were appointed") to be evidence for their case. JST leaves out this wording and reworks these verses. But the real question is whether the passage means that God placed people into a state of disobedience or whether they are put under the stone to be crushed because of their disobedience. I presume that no one would suggest that God is the cause of evil, so the second proposition would be correct.

Revelation 13:8

"And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world."

This passage refers to those "whose names are not written in the book of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world." The reference to the foundation of the world is to Christ as the chosen sacrifice, not to the time when the names were inscribed (or, in this case, not inscribed) in the book. Revelation 3:5 suggests that names can be blotted out of the book of life, which is clear evidence against the idea of predestination to salvation or damnation.

Revelation 17:8

"The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is."

On the surface, this seems to suggest that those predestined to salvation have their names inscribed "in the book of life from the foundation of the world." But in the same book of Revelation, Christ told John, "He that overcometh, the same shall be clothed in white raiment; and I will not blot out his name out of the book of life, but I will confess his name before my Father, and before his angels" (Revelation 3:5). Since one's name can be blotted out of the book of life, it is clear that we are not predestined to salvation or damnation. That names can be blotted out of the book of life because of sins is also affirmed by other Bible passages, as noted earlier in the section entitled "Names Written in Heaven."

Judged by Their Works

The Bible clearly teaches that God will judge us by our works. The apostle John wrote, "And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works. And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works" (Revelation 20:12-13; cf. Daniel 7:10).

Jesus explained the principle of salvation to Nicodemus, saying that "Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God... Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God" (John 3:3, 5). He then added:

And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up: That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life. For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God. (John 3:14-21)

From this, it is clear that, in addition to baptism by water and the Spirit, faith on Christ and good deeds are necessary for salvation. Moreover, the passage also notes that God "loved the world," not just some people in the world, and that he sent Christ "that the world through him might be saved." The fact that God contemplated the possibility that his Son could save the entire world, excludes the concept of predestination, since all would have a chance to hear the word and act in accordance therewith.

Repentance and Baptism

Since we are to be judged by our works, it is logical that we can be judged more harshly by committing more sins and blessed more as we repent of our sins. This is illustrated by Jesus' parable of the servants in Luke 12:42-48, where we learn that "unto whomsoever much is given, of him shall be much required: and to whom men have committed much, of him they will ask the more." The servant who is faithful to his absent master will be made "ruler over all that he hath," while the unfaithful servant "shall be beaten with many stripes." "But he that knew not, and did commit things worthy of stripes, shall be beaten with few stripes."

The principle of repentance is essential to salvation. This is clearly illustrated in the Lord's words to Ezekiel, in which he charged the prophet to warn the wicked to repent so he can be saved. The repentant sinner will be saved, while the righteous man who turns to sin will be punished. In addition, the prophet himself will be rewarded or punished according to his attempts to turn the sinner to God or his failure to do so (Ezekiel 3:18-21; 18:21-24; 33:11-16). Exodus 34:6-7 describes the Lord as "merciful and gracious, longsuffering, and abundant in goodness and truth, Keeping mercy for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, and that will by no means clear the guilty," suggesting that he does not save the unrepentant.

The principle underlying the responsibility to preach the word is explained in the Lord's word to Joseph Smith: "Behold, I sent you out to testify and warn the people, and it becometh every man who hath been warned to warn his neighbor" (D&C 88:81). The apostle Paul explained the principle thus: "For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved. How then shall they call on him in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard? and how shall they hear without a preacher? And how shall they preach, except they be sent?" (Romans 10:13-15). In 1 Thessalonians 2:16, he explained that the Judaizers were "Forbidding us to speak to the Gentiles that they might be saved." Clearly, salvation comes by hearing the gospel message and obeying its ordinances.

The Savior himself had this principle in mind during his final admonition to the apostles, when he said, "Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature. He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned" (Mark 16:15-16). Peter followed this commandment when, on the day of Pentecost, he responded to his audience's question about what they should do. He declared, "repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost" (Acts 2:38). This passage (along with Hebrews 6:1-2) lists the four things necessary for salvation, as explained in Articles of Faith 3-4:

We believe that through the atonement of Christ, all mankind may be saved, by obedience to the laws and ordinances of the Gospel. We believe that the first principles and ordinances of the Gospel are: first, Faith in the Lord Jesus Christ; second, Repentance; third, Baptism by immersion for the remission of sins; fourth, Laying on of hands for the gift of the Holy Ghost.

Note that article 3 does not say that "all mankind will be saved," only that they "may be saved." As in the Acts 2 passage, baptism is said to be "for the remission of sins." The term "faith" is not used in Acts 2:38, but the fact that one is "baptized in the name of Jesus Christ" suggests that baptism is of no effect without faith in Christ. Other New Testament passages that indicate that repentance and baptism are necessary for the remission of sins are Mark 1:4 and Luke 3:3; 24:47; Acts 2:38.

And behold, I say unto you that if ye do this ye shall always rejoice, and be filled with the love of God, and always retain a remission of your sins; and ye shall grow in the knowledge of the glory of him that created you, or in the knowledge of that which is just and true. (Mosiah 4:12)

Concluding Remarks

The basic premise of predestination is that God appointed some of us for salvation and others for damnation. This concept is refuted in Jesus' parable (Matthew 13:37-39) in which the "sower" (the Lord) sows wheat (the righteous), while his "enemy" (the devil) sows tares (the wicked). God did not place wickedness in the world; that was Satan's doing. The parable of the sower indicates that it was "the wicked one" who brought sin into the world (Matthew 13:19).

The implication of such passages for those who believe in predestination is that God would also have predestined the devil's evil works, making God the source of evil!28 For those who, like the Latter-day Saints, believe in the free will of mankind, the devil exercised his agency to reject God and become evil and continues trying to influence others to do likewise.

The Book of Mormon admonishes us to "retain a remission of your sins" (Mosiah 4:12; Alma 4:14). We do this by continually repenting of sins and renewing our baptismal covenant by partaking of the sacrament in remembrance of Christ's atonement. Nephi hinted at this concept in his discussion of the necessity of baptism as the gateway to the strait and narrow way that leads to God's presence (2 Nephi 31:17-18). He wrote:

And now, my beloved brethren, after ye have gotten into this strait and narrow path, I would ask if all is done? Behold, I say unto you, Nay; for ye have not come thus far save it were by the word of Christ with unshaken faith in him, relying wholly upon the merits of him who is mighty to save. Wherefore, ye must press forward with a steadfastness in Christ, having a perfect brightness of hope, and a love of God and of all men. Wherefore, if ye shall press forward, feasting upon the word of Christ, and endure to the end, behold, thus saith the Father: Ye shall have eternal life. (2 Nephi 31:19-20)

The Savior taught that we cannot enter into the kingdom of God without being baptized by water and by the Spirit (John 3:3-7). Peter wrote that those who "purified [their] souls in obeying the truth" they were "born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the word of God" (1 Peter 1:22-23). The Lord told Alma, "Marvel not that all mankind, yea, men and women, all nations, kindreds, tongues and people, must be born again; yea, born of God, changed from their carnal and fallen state, to a state of righteousness, being redeemed of God, becoming his sons and daughters; And thus they become new creatures; and unless they do this, they can in nowise inherit the kingdom of God" (Mosiah 27:25-26). Alma subsequently taught "that ye must repent, and be born again; for the Spirit saith if ye are not born again ye cannot inherit the kingdom of heaven; therefore come and be baptized unto repentance, that ye may be washed from your sins, that ye may have faith on the Lamb of God, who taketh away the sins of the world, who is mighty to save and to cleanse from all unrighteousness" (Alma 7:14; see also Alma 5:14).

Notes

1 Related to this discussion is the debate over grace/faith vs. works. See my "Salvation by Grace Alone?" posted at http://www.fairlds.org/Misc/Is_There_Salvation_by_Grace_Alone.html.

2 Not all Christians who believe in predestination accept all of Augustine's premises.

3 See Calvin's Institutes of the Christian Religion 3.21. For a comparison of the views of Martin Luther and Joseph Smith, see Dillenberger, John. "Grace and Works in Martin Luther and Joseph Smith," in Reflections on Mormonism: Judaeo-Christian Parallels, ed. Truman G. Madsen (Provo: BYU Religious Studies Center, 1978).

4 For a discussion, see chapter 41 ("Becoming as Little Children") in John A. Tvedtnes, The Most Correct Book: Insights from a Book of Mormon Scholar (Bountiful, UT: Cornerstone/Horizon, 1999), 278-281.

5 The Greek text actually reads "for the whole world (cosmos)," and the King James translators added the words "the sins of."

6 Christ's last admonition to his apostles, uttered in the garden of Gethsemane before his arrest, was to "Watch and pray, that ye enter not into temptation) (Matthew 26:41). This commandment is repeated in other passages of the Bible, the Book of Mormon, and the Doctrine and Covenants. See the discussion in chapter 28 ("Watch and Pray") in my The Most Correct Book.

7 Evidently alluding to Judas Iscariot.

8 Revelation 17:14 says that those who will participate with Christ in the final war against evil are "called, and chosen, and faithful." The term "faithful" indicates that something was expected of them and that they were not arbitrarily chosen for salvation. This reminds us that Nephi wrote that "the tender mercies of the Lord are over all those whom he hath chosen, because of their faith, to make them mighty even unto the power of deliverance" (1 Nephi 1:20). Other Book of Mormon passages indicate that Christ chose his disciples because of their faith in him (3 Nephi 19:20, 28).

9 Chief among the biblical passages used to support the idea of man's premortal existence in the presence of God is Jeremiah 1:4-5: "Then the word of the LORD came unto me, saying, Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee, and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations."

10 Alexander Roberts and James Donaldson, eds., Ante-Nicene Fathers 1:172.

11 Citing Deuteronomy 30:15, 19. A number of early pseudepigrapha indicate that God said the same thing to Adam.

12 Citing Isaiah 1:16, etc.

13 Alexander Roberts and James Donaldson, eds., Ante-Nicene Fathers 1:177.

14 Philip Schaff and Henry Wace, eds., Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series (reprint, Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1994), 11:471-472.

15 E. H. Gifford, translator, Eusebii Pamphili Evangelicae Praeparationis (Oxford, 1903), 3:281.

16 Institutes of the Christian Religion 3.22.8.

17 See also JST Isaiah 34:16; Alma 5:58; 3 Nephi 24:16-18; D&C 76:68. Similar statements are made about records kept on the earth: Mosiah 26:36; Alma 1:24; D&C 85:5, 11-12 (alluding to Ezra 2:61-63).

18 Cf. Psalm 109:13. For blotting out names from church records, see Alma 6:3; Moroni 6:7; D&C 20:83.

19 An allusion to Isaiah 6:10,which is cited in Matthew 13:15; John 12:40; Acts 28:27; 2 Nephi 16:10; 3 Nephi 9:13; D&C 112:13.

20 Philip Schaff and Henry Wace, eds., Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, 11:472.

21 The Latter-day Saint view is reflected in D&C 88:33: "For what doth it profit a man if a gift is bestowed upon him, and he receive not the gift? Behold, he rejoices not in that which is given unto him, neither rejoices in him who is the giver of the gift."

22 Institutes of the Christian Religion 3.22.3.

23 Some Latter-day Saints, citing Joseph Smith, believe that all priesthood holders were foreordained to the priesthood in the premortal world. The relevant passage, in History of the Church 6:364: "Every man who has a calling to minister to the inhabitants of the world was ordained to that very purpose in the Grand Council of heaven before this world was. I suppose that I was ordained to this very office in that Grand Council." I read the words "a calling to the inhabitants of the world" as those holding keys for the entire world, which would mean that only apostles were intended by the prophet Joseph, though it may apply only to presidents of the Church or dispensation leaders. See also Abraham 3:23. For Joseph Smith's foreordination, see also D&C 127:2 and History of the Church 5:143.

24 I am aware that God's thoughts and ways are infinitely greater than ours (Isaiah 55:8-9), but since it was theologians and not God who devised the false concept of predestination, their view must be subject to reason.

25 There is a translation problem in this passage, but it does not affect what is said here.

26 KJV uses the word coast to denote a border, though modern English uses it exclusively in the sense of the seashore.

27 Alexander Roberts and James Donaldson, eds., Ante-Nicene Fathers (reprint Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1994), 9:324-325.

28 I have no doubt that some might rationalize this in ways other than I have described here.

 

The great conflict was between Calvin and the teachings of J. Arminius.  The Puritans followed Calvin, while the Methodists followed Arminius.

 

Arminian Dependence?             

 

A popular theory among those who believe Joseph Smith wrote all or part of the Book of Mormon on his own is that the text reveals Arminian influences. The adjective "Arminian" has both a descriptive and a derivative sense. In the descriptive sense "Arminian" simply means any part of a "theological reaction against the deterministic logic of Calvinism" (Cross 90). In this sense of the term many things are called Arminian which are not dependent upon the writings of the Dutchman Jakob Harmenzoon, whose name is latinized as Jacobus Arminius. fn It is in this sense that Thomas F. O'Dea referred to the Book of Mormon as Arminian, since it (1) denies the doctrine of predestination and (2) teaches that Christ died for all men and not just for those predestined to be saved. However, other specialists reject the term "Arminianism" as being inappropriate to describe what was happening theologically in the northeastern United States in the early nineteenth century (Smith et al., 1:374ff). The Book of Mormon can be called Arminian only in the sense that its teachings on these two points agree with those of Arminius and his Remonstrant followers. The full Arminian doctrine as stated in the Remonstrance adds three more points: (3) man cannot exercise saving faith without the regeneration of the Holy Spirit, (4) man can fall from grace, (5) the grace of the Holy Spirit is sufficient for continued victory over sin. But any similarity or agreement between the teaching of Arminius and that of the Book of Mormon does not necessarily prove influence or dependence, since many parties and individuals had held similar beliefs even before the 17th century, from Pelagius and the semi-Pelagians down to Erasmus and Carlstadt, who lived a century before Arminius himself. In fact, the provincial Council of Carthage was convened in 418 AD for the sole purpose of dealing with these same issues. Thus any argument that the Book of Mormon is dependent upon Arminianism must also prove that the doctrine in question was exclusively Arminian. Similarity is not necessarily dependence. One certainly didn't need to be a student of Arminius to believe in free agency and a universal atonement. In fact, after the Roman Catholic Counter-Reformation, the hard-liners known as Jansenists even accused the Jesuits of teaching unrestrained free will and a universal salvation.

 

And yet, Arminius did not believe in either moral agency or in a universal atonement in the same way that the Book of Mormon teaches them. Arminius believed in original sin, and that only Christians would be delivered from original sin by the Atonement of Christ. All others would suffer for the sin of Adam. For Arminius the atonement was potentially universal, but actually limited to believers. "As for the universal removal of the guilt of original sin, Arminius says that there could be such but there is not. Participation in Christ's benefits is by faith alone, hence only believers are delivered from the guilt" (Bangs 339). This is a far cry from the LDS belief that all men benefit from the Atonement through which no one will suffer for Adam's sin. Arminius' view of free will can hardly be compared to the Book of Mormon view, since he says:

 

In this state the free will of man toward the true good is not only wounded, maimed, infirm, bent and weakened; but it is also imprisoned, destroyed, and lost. And its powers are not only debilitated and useless unless they be assisted by grace, but it has no powers whatsoever except such as are excited by divine grace (Bangs 341).

 

For Arminius human beings, though "free," have no power to choose the good in any degree whatsoever without first receiving divine grace. Without grace man is not free to choose the good, or indeed, to choose at all. This is hardly the Book of Mormon doctrine of free agency:

 

Wherefore, men are free according to the flesh; and all things are given them which are expedient unto man. And they are free to choose liberty and eternal life, through the great Mediator of all men, or to choose captivity and death, according to the captivity and power of the devil; for he seeketh that all men might be miserable like unto himself (2 Nephi 2:27).

 

In fact, Arminianism did not really constitute an identifiable theology separate from the Reformed Church at all. As Frederic Platt has observed: "Apart from these and kindred questions involved in the problem of predestination, Arminianism has no definite theological distinctness. It attempts no fresh statement of the doctrines of God and man" (1:808). Therefore, to say that the Book of Mormon is Arminian is nothing more than to say that it teaches moral agency and a universal atonement, although in a fashion and with a logic totally distinct from that of Arminius himself.

 

But the expansion theory does not claim mere similarities or parallel beliefs; it claims actual dependence of the Book of Mormon upon the writings of the Arminians (Ostler 81-82). Such a claim must be based on more than a few parallels, since "Arminian" parallels also exist for movements and individuals who preceded Arminius and who could not therefore be dependent. Mere similarities between documents or ideas do not prove that the latter are dependent upon the former.

 

If the expansion theory argues that the Book of Mormon is dependent on the writings of Jacob Arminius, then its advocates are obligated to prove (a) that Book of Mormon parallels involve exclusively Arminian doctrines, and (b) that specific verses in the Book of Mormon show literary dependence (not mere parallelism) upon specific passages in the writings of the Arminians. But the expansionists have not so far attempted to do either. If dependence is the claim, then a formal demonstration of that dependence is required. Certainly, it needs more than just a dogmatic assertion of such dependence. The Book of Mormon can rightly be described as Arminian only in the sense that, in common with many before Arminius, it rejects predestination and teaches that Christ died for all men.

 

Dr. Stephen Robinson

(Monte S. Nyman and Charles D. Tate, Jr., eds., Second Nephi: The Doctrinal Structure [Provo: BYU Religious Studies Center, 1989], 406.)

 

We discussed the Mayflower and who came over, John Howland and his descendants.

 

Joseph Smith's Ancestry
__________

It was decreed in the councils of eternity, long before the foundations of the earth were laid, that Joseph Smith should be the man in the last dispensation of this world to bring forth the word of God to this people and receive the fulness of the keys and power of the priesthood of the Son of God. The Lord has had his eyes upon him and upon his father, and upon his father's father, and upon their progenitor’s clear back to Abraham, and from Abraham to the flood, and from the flood to Enoch, and from Enoch to Adam. He has watched that family and that blood as it has circulated from the foundation to the birth of that man. Joseph Smith was foreordained in eternity to preside over this last dispensation.
 
 

Brigham Young
Journal of Discourses 7:289

 

 

 

 

Prominent Descendents of John Lathrop
____________________

Outside the Church:

Robert Bacon - Secretary of State
Rederick Augustus Porter Barnard - President of Columbia University
Kingman Brewster, Jr. -  President of Yale/Amabssador to Gt. Britain
Melville Fuller - Chief Justices of U.S. Supreme Court
Franklin D. Roosevelt - President of U.S.
Thomas Dewey - New York Governor
Adlai Stevenson - U.S. Senator
John Dulles - Secretary of State
Oliver Wendell Holmes - Supreme Courty Justice
Ulysses S. Grant - President of U.S.
George Romney - Governor of Michigan
Benidict Arnold - American Revolutionary Figure
George Bush - President of U.S.
George W. Bush - President of U.S.
Ebenezer Huntington - Revolutionary War Officer, Congressman
Isaac Huntington - Connecticut Convention, voted for Constitution
Henry Wadsworth Longfellow - American Novelist
 

Within the Church:

Joseph Smith                                           Frederick G. Williams                               Marion G. Romney
Hyrum Smith                                            Wilford Woodruff                                    N. Eldon Tanner
Parley P. Pratt                                          Joseph F. Smith
Orson Pratt                                              Joseph Fielding Smith
Brigham Young                                       Harold B. Lee
Heber C. Kimball                                     

 

Notable Descendents of Henry Howland
______________________

[Underlined names are sons of Henry Howland]

 

Arthur Howland

Sir Winston Churchill


John Howland  (Came over on the Mayflower)

Joseph Smith
Emma Hale
Franklin D. Roosevelt
George Bush
George W. Bush


Henry Howland

Richard Nixon
Gerald Ford

 
 
 
Reformation in England

Kings and Queens of England during early part of Reformation

Henry VIII (1491-1547)
    - Catherine
            Mother of Mary Tudor
    - Anne Boleyn
            Mother of Elizabeth
    - Jane Seymour
            Mother of Edward VI

Edward VI (ruled during 1547-1553)
        - Ruled six years (9 until 17 years old)
        - Reform ideas continued to grow

Mary Tudor (ruled during 1553-1558)
        - Catholic
        - Persecuted those who held to reformed views - "Bloody Mary"

Elizabeth (ruled during 1558-1603)
        - Elizabethan Settlement (1563) - a theological statement that formed the basis of the Church of England
 
Puritans
    - Did not feel that the Elizabethan Settlement did not go far enough in rejecting Catholic theology and practices. They wanted to reject the settlement and purify the church of all Catholic elements.
    - Persecuted by English kings and queens

Colonization of New England

 

Separatists (Plymouth Plantation)
    - Separating
    - Holland
    - Plymouth Plantation

The Great Migration (Puritan) (Massachusetts Bay Colony)
    - English Persecution
    - John Lathrop (common ancestor of Joseph Smith, Brigham Young, etc.)
    - Religious Intolerance
            Roger Williams (War of books between Williams and Cotton)
            - Williams - The Blood Tenet of Persecution. (The blood was from those killed because of their religious ideas.)
            - Cotton - The Bloody Tenet Washed and Made White.
            - Williams - The Bloody Tenet Made Yet More Bloody by Mr. Cotton's Endeavor to Wash it White in the Blood of the Lamb.
    - Salem Witch Trials

American Revolution (1775-1783)

Constitution and Bill of Rights
    - Constitution ratified in 1788
    - Bill of Rights ratified in 1791

 
 
 
The Puritan believed they were establishing Zion, and preparing for the 2nd coming.  They would persecute those who didn’t believe them.

John Adams – Calvinist ----------------------------------- Thomas Jefferson – Anti Calvinist - They wrote interesting letters to each other, Adams wrote more.

The question of the day; is salvation limited or universal?  Joseph Smith’s question

JS History 1:5-8, 11-21

Various versions of the 1st vision, different people want to hear the story; the 1838 version is the official Church record.  The day was a clear and bright early spring day (no leaves on the trees!).  He wanted his sins forgiven; he didn’t plan on the answers he received.  He didn’t plan on establishing a Church, or being the Prophet to usher in the last dispensation of the fulness of times.

Rev. Lane’s reaction to Joseph’s story, you can’t sit on the fence.

Some few days after I had this vision, I happened to be in company with one of the Methodist preachers, who was very active in the before mentioned religious excitement [probably the Rev. George Lane]; and, conversing with him on the subject of religion, I took occasion to give him an account of the vision which I had had. I was greatly surprised at his behavior; he treated my communication not only lightly, but with great contempt, saying it was all of the devil, that there were no such things as visions or revelations in these days; that all such things had ceased with the apostles, and that there would never be any more of them.

 

I soon found, however, that my telling the story had excited a great deal of prejudice against me among the professors of religion, and was the cause of great persecution, which continued to increase; and though I was an obscure boy, only between fourteen and fifteen years of age, and my circumstances in life such as to make a boy of no consequence in the world, yet men of high standing would take notice sufficient to excite the public mind against me, and create a bitter persecution; and this was common among all the sects—all united to persecute me. fn

 

 

(Hyrum L. Andrus, Doctrinal Commentary on the Pearl of Great Price [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1967], 429.)

 

Methodist Minutes (New York, 1819), 51. From July, 1820, to July, 1821, the Ontario Circuit was supplied by Thomas Wright and Elihu Nash. Methodist Minutes (New York, 1820), 44. Some LDS historians have identified Rev. George Lane as possibly one of the ministers who participated in the religious excitement of 1819-1820. Rev. George Lane was appointed presiding elder of the Susquehanna District in northern Pennsylvania at a canference held in Vienna (now Phelps) during the summer of 1819. The following summer, Elder Lane attended the annual conference held in Niagara. Therefore, before and after the First Vision, this minister could have been in the area where Joseph lived. However, the Prophet did not identify the Methodist preacher who initiated the religious excitement in the place where he lived nor the individual he contacted following this memorable experience. For additional information on this preacher and his possible connections with Mormonism, see Larry C. Porter, "Reverend George Lane," BYU Studies, IX (Spring, 1969), 321-340.

((Milton V. Backman, Jr., Joseph Smith's First Vision: Confirming Evidences and Contemporary Accounts, 2d ed. rev. [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1980],.)

 

 

 

 

Organization of the Church

 

February 12, 2004

 

 

The Whitmer and Knight families played a great role in the restoration of the gospel.  Bruce said we will discuss the Knight family in the near future.

 

 

D&C 20:61 – Church conferences are to be held every 3 months, the 1st one was in June of 1830.  Now with the growth of the church, conferences are split between general and stake.

 

 

Martin Harris had tremendous faith in the restoration.  He mortgaged his 120 acre farm for $3,000 to pay for the publishing of 5,000 copies of the Book of Mormon, much to the consternation of his wife Lucy!  The Smith’s paid $100.00 a year for the rent of the farm, and needed help to pay it!

 

 

D&C 24:7-9 – Joseph’s calling was spiritual in nature not material.  One of his weaknesses was finances and being a provider for his family, it kept him humble relying on others for the family’s welfare.  The church does not get out of debt until President Heber J. Grant.

(Doctrine and Covenants 24:7-9.)

 

7 For thou shalt devote all thy service in Zion; and in this thou shalt have strength.

 

8 Be patient in afflictions, for thou shalt have many; but endure them, for, lo, I am with thee, even unto the end of thy days.

 

9 And in temporal labors thou shalt not have strength, for this is not thy calling. Attend to thy calling and thou shalt have wherewith to magnify thine office, and to expound all scriptures, and continue in laying on of the hands and confirming the churches.

 

 

Prophets are called for a specific purpose by the Lord.  Joseph was called to restore the gospel again on the earth, Brigham was to lead the saints west and establish the kingdom in the mountains, John Taylor led the church during intense persecution, and President Hinckley is a temple builder throughout the entire world.

 

We had a long discussion about the makeup of the Doctrine and Covenants.  Joseph heavily edited sections; revelations were added to sections over time, as 20, and 107, section 132 was given in 1831 but wasn’t written until 1843!

 

The Organization Revelations

(D&C 20, 21, and 22)

 

RICHARD LLOYD ANDERSON

 

What is the "most distinguishing feature of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints"? President David O. McKay gave a succinct answer: "divine authority by direct revelation." fn The three revelations surrounding church organization give the same answer. The longest is section 20, prepared as a declaration of doctrine and practice. Its two important satellites are section 21, given on the founding day to clarify the position of the Prophet, and section 22, given soon afterward to explain the need for rebaptism by the power of the restored priesthood. All these revelations can be called the "constitution" of the Restored Church. But by length and intent, this title really belongs to section 20, with the following sections as valuable amendments. Section 20 is one of the few long revelations in the Doctrine and Covenants, a sure indication of its importance. Nothing longer had been given before the Church was formally established. fn

 

The first page of the first Latter-day Saint periodical printed section 20 with the title, "The Articles and Covenants of the Church of Christ." fn Because section 22 is appended there, some historians feel that this title applied to both sections. But evidence does not bear this out, since only one other primary manuscript includes section 22 with section 20. fn Otherwise "The Articles and Covenants" is applied solely to section 20. That is the case in its June, 1833 reprint in The Evening and Morning Star, in its heading in the 1833 Book of Commandments, and in the 1835-36 Kirtland reprints of the June, 1832 and June, 1833 issues of the Star. Was section 22 included at first in "The Articles and Covenants," dropping out later? More probably, the first printers in Missouri were away from the Prophet and included the short message on baptismal authority as a matter of logic. A year later the same editors printed "Articles and Covenants" above section 20 in the Book of Commandments, with section 22 printed separately. Thus when early journals, minutes, and priesthood licenses mention "The Articles and Covenants of the Church," they are likely referring only to section 20. fn In 1835 and 1844, the chronological arrangement of the Book of Commandments was altered by placing the main doctrinal and priesthood revelations directly after the revealed preface. Then section 20 appeared as the second document in the Doctrine and Covenants, consistent with its prominence from the beginning. fn The first general conference after organization was 9 June 1830, and the minutes read: "Articles and Covenants read by Joseph Smith, Jr. and received by unanimous voice of the whole congregation." This emphasis was repeated in the next conference of 26 September 1830: "Articles and Covenants read by Br. Oliver Cowdery." fn

 

There are more eloquent revelations in the Doctrine and Covenants. After all, America's Declaration of Independence is more vibrant than its Constitution. But few revelations will repay study with so many spiritual dividends as section 20. Its main parts are a review of the historical revelations of the restoration, followed by a statement of distinctive beliefs, and concluded by the longer section of sacred ordinances and priesthood government. These last two subjects need less discussion here because section 20 treats them with full detail. fn

 

The Restoration Revelations

 

The opening segment (D&C 20:1-16) stresses the visions that brought about the Book of Mormon. The angel's coming to Joseph Smith is seen in a brilliant verbal photograph (D&C 20:6-8), fully explained later in the motion pictures of the Prophet's historical narratives. fn Likewise, the vision of the Book of Mormon witnesses is glimpsed: "Confirmed to others by the ministering of angels, and is declared unto the world by them" (D&C 20:10). fn The First Vision is also identified in a most important historical reference. Joseph Smith fell into transgression "after it was truly manifested unto this first elder that he had receive a remission of his sins" (D&C 20:5). So the sequence is clearly a revelation of forgiveness, further transgression, and then "after repenting . . . God ministered unto him by an holy angel" (D&C 20:6). Joseph Smith's vision narratives detail his repentance before the 1823 coming of Moroni, but the "Articles and Covenants" tells that God's pardon was earlier "manifested," a term generally synonymous with "revealed" in the Doctrine and Covenants. There is no doubt about Joseph's thinking on the subject, for in his diary accounts of 1832 and 1835, he personally related the glorious First Vision as including divine assurance of forgiveness of sins, followed by lapsing into transgression, and then the 1823 coming of the angel revealing the Book of Mormon. fn Thus the First Vision was briefly noted from the beginning of the Church, but in terse language that those informed would understand.

 

The review of revelations closes with the testimony that "we, the elders of the Church, have heard and bear witness to the words of the glorious Majesty on high" (D&C 20:16). Literalism just seen in listing the other supernatural experiences goes against interpreting these words allegorically. The presiding elders are named in the opening language, and they stood together in the woods when "the voice of the Lord commanded us" to bear record of the revelation and translation of the Book of Mormon. fn In a similar setting they had prayed for priesthood authority, when "the voice of the Redeemer spake peace to us," followed by the angelic ordination by John the Baptist. fn And after the similar coming of ancient apostles, they were authorized to use the restored apostleship by "the voice of God in the chamber of old Father Whitmer," where Joseph and Oliver were translating the Book of Mormon (D&C 128:21). fn In summary, the 1830 Articles and Covenants surveyed the same events that the Prophet gave in his 1832 journal and also in his history, which he began in 1838 specifically to review his calling as a Prophet. All three accounts begin with some form of "the rise of the Church of Christ," followed by the story of how it was set up by God and not man. These three histories review the First Vision, the revelations resulting in the Book of Mormon, and the restoration of priesthood authority to establish the modern Church. Thus in phrases compressed with meaning, the founding document consciously paraphrases Paul's review of revelation that would bring "so great salvation" because it was based on divine "signs and wonders," and many "miracles" (Heb. 2:3-4). Just as the apostles' authority was validated by the miraculous events of the Gospels and Acts, modern apostles testified together of the revealed reality of "so great witnesses" (D&C 20:13) in calling a world to God's renewed work.

 

Articles of Faith and Doctrine

 

The next segment of section 20 presents articles of faith. Like the fuller Articles of Faith done in Nauvoo, they can be better understood by agreements and disagreements with the prevalent Protestant creeds. Joseph and his family were involved with the Methodist and Presbyterian churches. So their statements of belief are points of departure for the Latter-day Saint Articles and Covenants. The LDS format has marked similarities, though content deeply differs. Protestant creeds generally began with God and moved to the fall, Christ's redemption, the saving ordinances, and the believer's moral duties. That also summarizes D&C 20:17-26. But this simple LDS credo eliminates all language about the God "without body" and "parts" as well as the strong descriptions that the Father and Son are together "one substance." fn Indeed, these phrases come from the later Christian councils, not the scriptures. Joseph said that in 1820 the First Vision taught him the error of Christian creeds, and in 1830 he avoided their nonscriptural language in the first statement of Latter-day Saint beliefs.

 

Is "Mormonism" Christian? Fully half of its first articles of faith (D&C 20:17-26) concentrate on the reality of Christ's mission and how one gains the benefits of his atonement. The oldest continuous test of Christian belief is the Apostles Creed, a blending of convictions about Christ known to have circulated from the early second century. fn Since section 20 repeats most of these basics on Christ's mission (vv. 21-24), Latter-day Saints should clearly be classed as early Christian. Section 20 then sets out to wash away the later sediments that formed on the bedrock of Christ's saving work.

 

The doctrines of "justification" and "sanctification" through Christ's grace are affirmed, a necessity because they are prominent in the apostles' letters. They explain that all are considered forgiven or "just" through their acceptance of Christ's plan of salvation, and that by continued faithfulness they may become holy, the literal meaning of "sanctify." New Testament letters are not primarily letters of rejoicing but of exhorting—asking believers in Christ to retain their holiness of life and increase in it. fn Thus in the Articles and Covenants, "there is a possibility that man may fall from grace" (D&C 20:32). This negates the Presbyterian formula that those "effectually called and sanctified by his Spirit can neither totally nor finally fall away from the state of grace." fn But in Latter-day Saint doctrine, human agency chooses, and even God's decree cannot modify it. In the Articles and Covenants, man's choice links with God's grace but is not a mere result of it. Protestant theory generally defines the moral life as a desirable result of the Holy Spirit but does not insist that salvation hangs on tough decisions of self-control. Thus in section 20, salvation demands the grace of Christ, but also baptism, followed by individual performance to "endure in faith to the end" (D&C 20:25). fn

 

Section 20 also attacks traditional theology on the idea of complete statements of belief. The Westminster Confession freezes "the whole counsel of God"—meaning "all things necessary for . . . man's salvation, faith, and life"—into the cubicle of the listed 66 books of the Bible, "unto which nothing at any time is to be added, whether by new revelations of the Spirit, or traditions of men." fn Echoes of a completed canon and closed system also come in the Methodist articles, where existing scriptures "contain all things necessary to salvation." fn But the Prophet told an inquirer that "the first and fundamental principle of our holy religion is, that we believe that we have a right to embrace all, and every item of truth, without limitation or without being circumscribed or prohibited by the creeds or superstitious notions of men"—provided it comes "by any manifestation, whereof we know that it has come from God." fn This became a major theme of Joseph's striking Nauvoo discourses, but it was just as clear at the foundation, when the Articles and Covenants declared faith both in past "holy scriptures" and also in the call of new prophets "in this age and generation, as well as in generations of old" (D&C 20:11). John's warning not to add (Rev. 22:18-19) was seen as cautioning men and not shackling God, whose revelations would "come hereafter by the gift and power of the Holy Ghost, the voice of God, or the ministering of angels" (D&C 20:35).

 

The Expansion of Section 20

 

Critics ridicule later additions in section 20, but they have not faced the open-ended principle of continuing revelation. As a basic statement of doctrine and practice, section 20 has been rephrased far more than other revelations. And some additions, principally vv. 65-67, update the expanding priesthood offices of the Church. Thus the first high priests were ordained in 1831, so reference to this office was later inserted in the 1830 Articles. Yet there was no attempt to mislead, for the earliest printing of this revision was subtitled, "With a few items from other revelations," meaning the changes to section 20, for no parts of any other sections were printed then. fn Indeed, section 20 had grown with the Church, for Aaronic Priesthood restoration made baptism operative after 15 May 1829, fn as described by Joseph Smith, though he also said that the full use of the Melchizedek Priesthood was not authorized until some time later. fn A document giving 1829 Church practice was written by Oliver Cowdery and is the forerunner of Section 20. It remarkably fulfilled his blessing of section 8 to receive a "knowledge of the ancient records," for by the spirit of revelation he compiled and explained church ordinances from the Book of Mormon, opening with "A commandment from God unto Oliver how he should build up his Church." Instructions on baptism and the sacrament were given, and directions on ordaining teachers and priests. It closed: "Written in the year of our Lord and Savior 1829—a true copy of the Articles of the Church of Christ. O.C." fn In his aged years, David Whitmer expended much ink in arguing that "high priests" had been added to section 20, not remembering that "elders" had to be added to an earlier draft after that priesthood was authorized by the voice of God. fn

 

Thus the basic format of section 20 preceded the formal organization of the Church, as Joseph Smith wrote in indicating that the Lord gave a revelation that "pointed out to us the precise day" of incorporation. fn The 1833 Book of Commandments gave June, 1830 as the date of the revelation, though this could be the final form. Yet there is no proof of a late revision, so it is safer to follow Joseph Smith's chronology, for his history arranged the revelations in sequence, and he approved listing section 20 before the March, 1830 revelation (D&C 19). The Book of Commandments was published over 800 miles from Joseph Smith's residence and is not necessarily accurate in its headings, since several locations and dates were corrected in the Kirtland edition of the Doctrine and Covenants. One interesting dating problem within the revelation concerns the meaning of the Church organized "one thousand eight hundred and thirty years since the coming of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ in the flesh" (D&C 20:1). Does this give the exact year of Christ's birth? That calculation places too much weight on what may have been an elaborate phrase of dating or an incidental statement. The first edition of the Doctrine and Covenants Commentary cautioned against using this to prove that Christ was born at the exact beginning of the Christian Era; so have Bible scholars J. Reuben Clark and Bruce R. McConkie. fn Part of the problem is that Christ was alive at the death of Herod the Great, an event of 4 B.C. in careful chronologies.

 

D&C 21: The Prophet's Position

 

Joseph Smith's 1838-39 recollections of church organization seem clearly superior to David Whitmer's, made almost 50 years after that time. The latter rationalized his "congregational" position by minimizing the Prophet's authority, claiming that the main reason the young church organized was to obtain legal status for marriages and holding of church property. fn That is evidently part of the picture, since the Articles mention "being regularly organized . . . agreeable to the laws of our country" (D&C 20:1). But the same preface stresses the "will and commandments of God," similar phraseology to Joseph Smith's history of the founding day. Was there a divine purpose transcending the attempt to establish a legal corporation? Section 21 was given the day of organization and gives an organizational answer. Before 6 April 1830, there were believers, some baptized, in three major areas, Manchester-Palmyra, Fayette, and Colesville, just north of the Pennsylvania border. Whitmer argued that these branches functioned well with cooperative priesthood direction. Certainly Joseph had led by the prestige of his revelations, but where was his position specifically defined? By the revelation known as section 21, Joseph was designated to be ordained by Oliver Cowdery as "a seer" and "a prophet," the "first" elder in relationship to fellow-founder Oliver Cowdery (D&C 21:1, 11). fn Thus Joseph Smith was authorized to give "commandments" to the Church, which it was obligated to receive "as if from my own mouth" (D&C 21:4-5). So like the Constitutional Convention of the United States, the founding meeting of the Church established central executive government, a presiding prophet as head.

 

As Joseph's leadership was challenged in later situations, it was reinforced in further revelations. But the doctrinal constitution of section 20 has the important organizational supplement of section 21, showing that the church membership approves presiding priesthood, which is the proper agency for originating official doctrine. Section 21 was sealed with the power of the Spirit, for the recollections of that day report harmony and inspiration. The Prophet remembered the setting for the revelation: "The Holy Ghost was poured out upon us to a very great degree—some prophesied, whilst we all praised the Lord and rejoiced exceedingly." fn Joseph Knight, Sr., added in reference to the same revelation: "They all kneeled down and prayed, and Joseph gave them instructions how to build up the Church and exhorted them to be faithful in all things, for this is the work of God." fn

 

D&C 22: Rebaptism Required

 

The founding documents link the power of prophecy with the power of a presiding Prophet, the blending of divine revelation and divine authority. The new Church was unschooled in these principles, for section 22 soon came to explain what restored priesthood meant in relationship to baptism. Joseph's history gives the setting of applications for membership right after the organization meeting. His mention of his mother is intriguing. In her early marriage she was miraculously healed after a personal revelation assured her she would not die. Disagreeing with any church she knew, she nevertheless found "a minister who was willing to baptize me, and leave me free in regard to joining any religious denomination." fn Whether or not she was one who raised the question concerning rebaptism, her case illustrates the sincerity of baptisms performed by other churches. The heading of section 22 is not just the surmise of commentary but rephrases the heading printed in the Book of Commandments, Kirtland Doctrine and Covenants, and the Prophet's history: "Given . . . in consequence of some desiring to unite with the Church without rebaptism, who had previously been baptized." It is instructive to see the Prophet's history agree with earlier versions of the circumstances of section 22, but change the location from Fayette to Manchester. This conscious correction of data in Joseph's history shows a care which should lead historians to favor the sequence of revelations there also. This requirement of rebaptism is placed in his history in a five-day space after church organization, showing the immediate need to rule on the exclusive nature of priesthood ordinances of the restoration.

 

Section 22 ties to a passage in the book of Acts that puzzles commentators. On Paul's last eastern missionary journey, he rebaptized those who were already "disciples" (Acts 19:1-6). This last term in Acts indicates that they already believed in Jesus, so rebaptism "in the name" logically means not mere use, but proper employment of Christ's name, or its authorized use. fn Roger Williams was typical of American restorationists who considered Christian baptisms invalid until new authority should be sent from God. And the first harvest of converts to the restored Church in Northern Ohio was great because many seekers agreed with Latter-day Saint testimony that biblical ordinances were invalid without restored authority. fn After church organization, New York converts learned the same lesson as new revelation outdated old baptisms. From the beginning Joseph was consistent in claiming that no other church could validly perform gospel ordinances. Specifically, his history places section 22 between Tuesday, the church organization day, and the following Sunday, when a number of others were baptized. fn

 

Churches lax on the necessity of baptism would naturally not stress divine authority in administering it. However, baptism stands out in modern revelation as the foundation covenant for salvation. And to bring about this eternal result, the following conditions must be met: full repentance as measured by a worthy life before baptism (D&C 20:37), fn a condition that makes infant baptism unnecessary (D&C 20:71); the proper form of immersion (D&C 20:73-74); and performance by the true priesthood, a condition important enough to be stressed in words of the ceremony (D&C 20:73). Christian churches regularly use the trinitarian formula, since it is commanded by the Savior (Matt. 28:19-20), but Latter-day Saints are distinctive in adding words of authority to the baptismal prayer: "Having been commissioned of Jesus Christ" (D&C 20:73). fn

 

Theologians have resisted baptism as an essential element of salvation because a ceremony would thus be valued higher than inner faith or righteousness. But since Latter-day Saints view baptism as a covenant expressing faith and a means to virtue, ritual and reality are designed to blend. This covenant is a profound causal factor, a personal and social commitment, the specific obligations of which continue in the covenant of the Lord's Supper (D&C 20:37 and 20:77). Because the latter is the most visible and oft-repeated of all sacraments, it is for Latter-day Saints the Sacrament. But for them it is not the mystical sacrifice of the Roman Catholic Mass, or the focus on Communion that gives the Protestant hope for divine companionship. For the Latter-day Saint the Sacrament is an inspired personal promise for growth. Thus "the duty of the members after they are received by baptism" is overall "works and faith" (D&C 20:68-69). This "duty" of modern disciples matches the challenge in New Testament epistles to desert the old "conversation" (Gal. 1:13; Eph. 4:22), a Greek term (anastrophe) meaning a way of life and not merely communication. Thus baptism commits one to a lifetime of being inspired by Christ and living up to his standards "by a godly walk and conversation" (D&C 20:69). These last two nouns are synonymous, since "conversation" is there used in the older sense of the King James Bible.

 

Summary

 

In perspective, the three revelations associated with church organization proclaim neither revelation only nor authority only, but the bonding of the two. New revelation restored lost knowledge and the authority to reestablish the divine organization and ceremonies so fully described in the Book of Mormon (Moro. chapters 1-6). This first priesthood handbook, the Articles and Covenants, is supplemented by the next two sections clarifying the presiding keys of the Prophet, and the only valid priesthood of the Restored Church. The modern Church of Christ began with a commission from him that invalidated "all old covenants" of Christian churches, whether based on tradition or reformation (D&C 22:1). This astonishing message came with the credentials of a loving God interested in the salvation of all people of all generations (D&C 20:25-27), a foreshadowing of the later sweeping revelations on degrees of glory and salvation for the dead. And whether in the words of the organization statement of doctrine, of the revealed preface given a year later (D&C 1:30), or of a later presiding prophet, Spencer W. Kimball, "There is just one church which Jesus Christ, himself, organized by direct revelation; just one church that teaches all of his doctrines; just one church which has all of the keys and authorities which are necessary to carry on the work of Jesus Christ." fn

 

Notes The Organization Revelations

 

1. David O. McKay, Gospel Ideals (Salt Lake City: Improvement Era, 1953), P.98 (1937), P.533 (1952). Cf. Wilford Woodruff's report of an 1843 Joseph Smith discourse: "Whenever men can find out the will of God and find an administrator legally authorized from God, there is the kingdom of God." Andrew F. Ehat and Lyndon W. Cook, eds., The Words of Joseph Smith (Provo, Ut.: Brigham Young University Religious Studies Center, 1980), p. 158, also TPJS, p. 274.

 

2. No earlier revelation begins to approach the length of section 20 except section 10, given in the crisis of the loss of the 116 pages of Book of Mormon manuscript. Even that section is about twenty percent shorter than section 20.

 

3. The Evening and the Morning Star 1:1 (June 1832). But the earliest known copy appeared in the non-Latter-day Saint press just a year after church organization, antedating known Latter-day Saint printings and manuscripts by about a year: Painsville [Ohio] Telegraph, 19 April 1831, p. 4. The editor said that his document came "from the hand of Martin Harris," and it begins with the same heading quoted above from the 1832 Evening and Morning Star. The text is nearly exactly that later published in the Book of Commandments, but see n. 26, below. LDS archives holds a letter from Lucy Mack Smith to her brother Solomon Mack, written from Waterloo, New York, 6 January 1831, published by Ben E. Rich in his Scrapbook of Mormon Literature. Lucy quoted D&C 20:6-8 quite closely, so all evidence points to the identity of the 1830 text and that which was published from 1831 on.

 

4. For a table of early mss. and printings, see Robert J. Woodford, "The Historical Development of the Doctrine and Covenants" (Ph.D. dissertation, Brigham Young University, 1974), Table 20. Out of five copies dated 1832-34, only one manuscript includes section 22 with section 20. Since another includes most of the revelation giving the law of the Church (D&C 42), the tendency is evident for section 20 to attract other revelations that had different titles or circumstances. The earliest known copy of section 20 is printed in the Painesville Telegraph, 19 April 1831, and it appends section 22 and also section 27 in its early Book of Commandments form. However, the "Articles and Covenants" heading applies only to section 20, since the added sections have their own titles. Section 22 is headed: "A commandment unto the Church of Christ, which was established in these last days A.D. 1830, on the 4th month and the 6th day of the month which is called April." Section 27 is headed: "A commandment given unto Joseph, concerning the Sacrament. " Cf. n. 3.

 

5. Early priesthood licenses refer to the proper authorization outlined in section 20, and Joseph Smith referred to the opening part of section 20 in alluding to his youthful weaknesses. On the latter point see Messenger and Advocate, December, 1834, conveniently printed in Dean C. Jessee, The Personal Writings of Joseph Smith (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1984), p. 337. No known quotation from "The Articles and Covenants" refers to any other revelation than section 20.

 

6. Section 22 appeared as section 47 in the 1835 Kirtland edition and in the 1844 Nauvoo edition of the Doctrine and Covenants.

 

7. Both minute entries quoted appear under the dates given in the Far West Record. See Donald Q. Cannon and Lyndon W. Cook, Far West Record (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1983), pp. 1, 3.

 

8. For additional discussion of Book of Mormon references in section 20, see Monte S. Nyman, "The Witnesses of the Book of Mormon," found herein.

 

9. See the Prophet's principal vision narratives in Jessee, The Personal Writings, pp. 4 95.; 74 ff.; 196 ff.; 212 ff. Cf. Richard Lloyd Anderson, "Confirming Records of Moroni's Coming," Improvement Era 73 (October 1970): 82-89.

 

10. Doctrine and Covenants quotations in this chapter are from the current edition, but they have been checked carefully against the earliest copies. In the case of section 2O, there are verbal variations, none of which affect meaning in the quotations used. The quoted sentence from section 20 clearly reflects the language of the Three Witnesses, who "declare" that they saw the angel and the plates in their printed testimony in the Book of Mormon. See also Monte S. Nyman, "The Witnesses of the Book of Mormon," found herein.

 

11. See Jessee, The Personal Writings, p. 6: "I saw the Lord, and he spake unto me, saying Joseph, my son, thy sins are forgiven thee." And see ibid., p. 75: "Another personage soon appeared like unto the first—he said unto me, 'thy sins are forgiven thee."' My spelling and punctuation is used here.

 

12. Book of Mormon, The Testimony of Three Witnesses. Cf. D&C 128:20.

 

13. Oliver Cowdery to William W. Phelps, in Messenger and Advocate 1 (October 1834): 15-16, also JS-H 71, n. Cf. the summary phrase concerning "the certainty that we heard the voice of Jesus."

 

14. Cf. HC 1:60-61; see also Charles R. Harrell, "The Restoration of the Priesthood," found herein.

 

15. Quoted phrases appear in both the Westminster Confession of Faith (1647), chapter 2, and the Methodist Articles of Religion (1784), article 1, cited in the edition of Philip Schaff, The Creeds of Christendom (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Book House, 1983 reprint) 3:606-8, 807. Section 20 has language of the unity of the persons of the Trinity, but not their essential identity. Section 20 is verbally close to the individual statements of faith on the records of each congregational church of the time. These retained much Calvinism.

 

16. For known background and text of the Apostles Creed, see John H. Leith, Creeds of the Churches, rev. ed. (Atlanta: John Knox Press, 1973), pp. 22-25.

 

17. For a survey of the above issues, see Richard Lloyd Anderson, Understanding Paul (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1983), pp. 158-68; pp. 177-83.

 

18. Westminster Confession, chapter 17, cited in Schaff, The Creeds, 3:636.

 

19. Easy grace is not possible in the formula of D&C 20:31, where Christ's offer is only completed by the disciples' total and lifetime devotion. This high standard is evidently a criticism of simplistic regaining of grace, as in irresponsible practice of the Methodist view, "We may depart from grace given, and fall into sin, and by the grace of God, rise again and amend our lives." Methodist Articles, article 12, cited in Schaff, The Creeds, p. 809-10. Cf. Joseph Smith's later label of this as a half-truth: Ehat and Cook, The Words of Joseph Smith, pp. 333-34; also TPJS, pp. 338-39.

 

20. Westminster Confession, chapter 6, cited in Schaff, The Creeds, p. 603. Cf. chapter 2.

 

21. Methodist Articles, article 5, cited in Schaff, The Creeds, p. 808.

 

22. Joseph Smith to Isaac Galland, 22 March 1839, Liberty Jail, cited in Jessee, The Personal Writings, p. 420.

 

23. Evening and Morning Star, 1835 Kirtland reprint of June, 1832 issue, 1:2. Doctrine and Covenants editions from 1876 to 1920 carried a note that these verses had been added later, the same procedure in all printings of HC 1:68.

 

24. HC 1:39, 44, 51.

 

25. Ibid., pp. 60-1.

 

26. A full transcription of the Cowdery document is printed in Woodford, Historical Background to section 20. The continued interdependence of section 20 and the Book of Mormon is indicated in the major variant in the earliest present form of the revelation in the 1831 Painesville Telegraph, cited in n. 3, above. There the instructions on baptism and the Sacrament do not appear (D&C 20:72-79), but in their place is this sentence: "And the manner of baptism and the manner of administering the Sacrament are to be done as is written in the Book of Mormon."

 

27. HC 1:60-1. Cowdery's 1829 document indicates that he had the higher priesthood, since he speaks of himself as "an apostle of Jesus Christ by the will of God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ." Instructions were given on ordaining priests and teachers, the pattern of elders doing so in the Book of Mormon (Moro. 3:1) or apostles in D&C 18:31-32. But since the higher office of elder was evidently restricted at this time (after June, 1829, since D&C 18 is quoted liberally), David Whitmer overstated that elders were as operative before 6 April 1830 as afterward. This does not appear to be true in the Cowdery document, so David may also be inaccurate in his claim of preorganization confirmation. He remembered the 1829 circulation of a document that might be the same as the Cowdery revelation: "The Book of Mormon was still in the hands of the printer, but my brother, Christian Whitmer, had copied from the manuscript the teachings and doctrine of Christ, being the things which we were commanded to preach." See David Whitmer, An Address to All Believers in Christ (Richmond, Mo.: David Whitmer, 1887), pp. 32-33, and cf. pp. 59-60.

 

28. HC 1:64.

 

29. Hyrum M. Smith and Janne M. Sjodahl, The Doctrine and Covenants (Salt Lake City: Deseret News Press, 1923), p. 138. Cf. J. Reuben Clark, Jr., Our Lord of the Gospels (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1954), pp. vi-vii. See also Bruce R. McConkie, The Mortal Messiah, 4 books (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1979-81), 1:349-50.

 

30. Whitmer, An Address, pp. 32-33. Statutory requirements for church incorporation were met except filing—see Larry C. Porter, "Was the Church Legally Incorporated at the Time It Was Organized in the State of New York?" The Ensign, December 1978, pp. 26-27. This summarizes Porter's fuller treatment in his Brigham Young University doctoral dissertation, "A Study of the Origins of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in the States of New York and Pennsylvania, 1816-1831."

 

31. Though the 1835 Doctrine and Covenants originally designated "first" and "second" elders in D&C 20:2-3, Joseph Smith is called the "first elder" in the early versions of D&C 20:5, perhaps written before the explicit language on 6 April 1830 that Joseph Smith was "first" (D&C 21:11).

 

32. HC 1:78.

 

33. Joseph Knight, Manuscript of the Early History of Joseph Smith; also cited in Dean C. Jessee, "Joseph Knight's Recollection of Early Mormon History," BYU Studies 17 (Autumn 1976): 37. The context is also given in Lyndon W. Cook, The Revelations of the Prophet Joseph Smith (Provo, Ut.: Seventy's Mission Bookstore, 1981), pp. 32-33. Spelling and punctuation are edited in my quote. Whitmer later disagreed with the Prophet's presiding position, but he wrote of the harmony of members at the time of organization: "We had all confidence in Brother Joseph, thinking that as God had given him so great a gift as to translate the Book of Mormon, that everything he would do must be right" (Whitmer, p. 33).

 

34. Lucy Mack Smith, Biographical Sketches (Liverpool: Orson Pratt, 1853), p. 48, the same thought of the preliminary manuscript, though worded differently.

 

35. Cf. Anderson, Understanding Paul, pp. 593. Cf. the related incident (Acts 19:13-16), where Jesus' name was ineffectual in casting out evil spirits when used by an unauthorized individual.

 

36. See the recollections of restored authority as the key issue in the conversions of John Murdock and Edward Partridge: Milton V. Backman, Jr., The Heavens Resound: A History of the Latter-day Saints in Ohio, 1830-1838 (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1983), pp. 5-6, 16. Cf. Richard Lloyd Anderson, "The Impact of the First Preaching in Ohio," BYU Studies 11:480-83.

 

37. HC 1:79-81.

 

38. See also ibid., pp. 104-5.

 

39. The earliest manuscripts and printings followed the Book of Mormon language here: "Having authority given me of Jesus Christ" (cf. 3 Ne. 11:25). The shift of synonyms was made in the 1835 Kirtland printings. Cf. n. 26.

40. Edward L. Kimball, The Teachings of Spencer W. Kimball (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1982), p. 421.

 

 

(Robert L. Millet and Kent P. Jackson, eds., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 1: The Doctrine and Covenants [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1989], 109.)

 

Section 20 is a series of revelations (look at the Amen’s), others came from various sources.

Joseph had to verbalize visions (76) Joseph and Oliver disagreed on the language to be used.  Oliver had to learn his place, he wasn’t the Prophet.

 

The Story of the Doctrine and Covenants

By Robert J. Woodford
Ensign, Dec. 1984, pp. 32-38

[Two kinds of referencing were used in this article. Original footnotes are bracketed within the text.
References in parenthesis are original.]

We think of the "knowledge explosion" as a twentieth-century phenomenon--modern printing presses, humming computers, and chattering teletypes. But for Latter-day Saints, the explosion started even before the organization of the Church, with the Prophet Joseph receiving revelation upon revelation, sometimes several a day, for the guidance and instruction of the Saints.

We think of the Doctrine and Covenants as a tidily defined book, quietly resting with the other scriptures. But the story of how those revelations were written, prepared for publication, and moved through various stages until they reached our present edition is the story of trying to keep up with a flood of revealed knowledge--the story of how the prophets received revelation for the Church, how it was recorded, and how it was edited for publication. This article tells how we obtained our current edition of the Doctrine and Covenants.

Even before the Church was organized, the Prophet had received a number of revelations--for example, the First Vision and sections 2 through 19. Early Church members knew that continued revelation from God was one of the most important and distinctive aspects of the Church, and they were always eager to learn what the Lord communicated through the prophet in their behalf, At the first conference, in June 1830, members voted to receive from the Prophet "revelations and Commandments for this Church" [Far West Record (microfilm of the manuscript), Church Historical Department Archives, p. 2]. Members copied them for their own study. Missionaries recorded them for help in instructing converts. Orson Pratt remembers:

"We often had access to the manuscripts [of the revelations] when boarding with the Prophet; and it was our delight to read them over and over again, before they were printed. And so highly were they esteemed by us, that we committed some to memory; and a few we copied for the purpose of reference in our absence on missions, and also to read them to the saints for their edification. These copies are still in our possession." (The Seer [Mar. 1854]: 228.)

Many other people made copies of the revelations; but because care was not always taken in copying, many errors were made, repeated, and multiplied as the copies were copied. Realizing the importance of having correct copies, the leaders of the Church determined to publish them. Because the originals contained spelling and grammar errors, a Church conference moved that Joseph Smith should make the necessary corrections. (Far West Record, p. 16.) This was the beginning of controversies and charges made by persons who do not know or understand that the text of recorded revelation can be edited and "changed."

First, we must recognize that Joseph Smith's purposeful changes are in a different category from copying errors. Orson Pratt, who worked closely with him, described some of these changes:

"Joseph, the Prophet, in selecting the revelations from the Manuscripts, and arranging them for publication, did not arrange them according to the order of the date in which they were given, neither did he think it necessary to publish them all in the Book of Doctrine and Covenants, but left them to be published more fully in his History. Hence, paragraphs taken from the revelations of a later date are, in a few instances, incorporated with those of an earlier date. Indeed, at the time of compilation, the Prophet was inspired in several instances to write additional sentences and paragraphs to the earlier revelations. In this manner the Lord did truly give 'line upon line, here a little and there a little,' the same as He did to a revelation that Jeremiah received. And even though this revelation was burned by the wicked king of Israel, the Lord revealed the central message again with great numbers of additional content. (See Jeremiah xxxvi.32.)" (Millennial Star 17 [25 Apr. 1857]: 260.)

An example appears in section 20. When part of this revelation was originally given in 1830, the offices of bishop, high councilor, and high priest were not yet part of the Church, so Joseph Smith added them to the 1835 edition, as footnotes in the editions between 1876 and 1920 explain. Section 107 is another example. Close textual study shows at least five separate revelations received between November 1831 and 28 March 1835, the latter date being assigned to the compilation.
 

The Book of Commandments, 1833

At a momentous conference of the Church in Ohio, beginning 1 November 1831, a council of high priests of the Church in Ohio (Joseph Smith presiding) made the decision to publish the revelations under the title Book of Commandments and voted 10,000 copies for the first edition. (D&C 1; Far West Record, p. 15.) The Lord's will concerning the publication of the revelations was manifested when Joseph Smith received section 1, the Lord's "preface" to the book, during an interlude. Then began a lively discussion by Joseph Smith asking the elders what testimony they were willing to attach to the commandments. Some said they were willing to testify that the revelations came from God; others, however, expressed criticism of the language in which the revelations were expressed. (Far West Record, p. 16, History of the Church, 1:224.) Out of the discussion emerged a revelation, now section 67, in which a challenge was given by the Lord to anyone present to write a revelation equal to "the least" among those already given. (D&C 67; History of the Church, 1:225.) William E. McLellin, "having more learning than sense," tackled the project overnight and failed. (History of the Church, 1:226.)

That experience settled the controversy. Oliver Cowdery read section 67 the next morning and "the brethren then arose in turn and bore witness to the truth of the Book of Commandments." (Far West Record, p. 16.) During this same session, Joseph Smith received by inspiration a statement intended to be a verification of the truthfulness of the revelations that the elders were apparently going to sign and include in the Book of Commandments, somewhat as the testimony of the Three and Eight Witnesses included in the Book of Mormon. However, this declaration was not published at the time, probably because the press was destroyed in the middle of the project. (History of the Church, 1:226.) With a few minor changes in wording, the revelation now appears in the introductory pages of the Doctrine and Covenants as "Testimony of the Twelve Apostles to the Truth of the Book of Doctrine and Covenants."

It may be a surprise that the brethren at the conference would express any opposition to the wording of the revelations. Elder Parley P. Pratt, describing how the revelation which is now section 50 was given, wrote:

"After we had joined in prayer … he dictated in our presence the following revelation--(Each sentence was uttered slowly and very distinctly, and with a pause between each, sufficiently long for it to be recorded, by an ordinary writer, in long hand.)"

Elder Pratt continued:

"This was the manner in which all his written revelations were dictated and written. … As he dictated them so they stood." (Autobiography, 5th ed., Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1961, p. 62.)

Since all of the sections have been edited at some time or other, Elder Pratt's description, while it may be accurate in describing the dictation, is not complete in accounting for the final form of the revelations. President Wilford Woodruff defined revelation as "the inspiration of the Holy Ghost to man. Joseph Smith said to Brother John Taylor in his day: 'Brother Taylor, you watch the impression of the Spirit of God; you watch the whisperings of that Spirit to you; you carry them out in your life, and it will become a principle of revelation in you, and you will know and understand this Spirit and power. Joseph Smith was full of revelation. He could translate anything given to him of God. He could receive revelation without the Urim and Thummin. … [The revelations] were given to him by the inspiration of Almighty God.' “(Millennial Star, 12 Oct. 1891, p. 642.)

Elder Orson Pratt confirmed President Woodruff's statement and added: "Joseph … received the ideas from God, but clothed those ideas with such words as came to his mind" (italics added) [Minutes of the School of Prophets, Salt Lake Stake, 9 Dec. 1872, Church Historical Department Archives].

Joseph Smith, acting on the vote of the conference that he corrects the errors of language and clarity that he could discover, under the inspiration of the Holy Ghost, set to work at once. The conference did not end until November 12 and Oliver Cowdery and John Whitmer, the messengers who would take the revelations to be printed in Independence, Missouri, were planning to leave by November 15. Actually, they didn't set out until November 20, arriving in Independence on January 5.

A few months later, in the spring of 1832, Joseph Smith joined them for conferences and also to transact more business about the book. At an April 30 meeting, they decided to print only 3,000 instead of 10,000, to restrict availability of the manuscripts to those concerned with the printing, and to appoint Oliver Cowdery, W. W. Phelps, and John Whitmer to review the revelations again and "select for printing such as shall be deemed by them proper, as dictated by the Spirit and make all necessary verbal corrections." (Far West Record, p. 25.) This last motion gave these brethren the responsibility of selecting those revelations to appear in the LDS newspaper, The Evening and Morning Star.

They made their selections from revelations that Oliver Cowdery and John Whitmer had brought to Independence in January 1832 and from those Joseph Smith brought the following April. Starting in June 1832, each issue of the Evening and Morning Star for over a year contained one or more revelations. Unfortunately, these copies contained printing errors. When Oliver Cowdery began reprinting the Evening and Morning Star in Kirtland in 1834, after mob violence stopped publication in Independence, he explained: "In the first 14 numbers, in the Revelations, are many errors, typographical, and others, occasioned by transcribing manuscript; but as we shall have access to originals, we shall endeavor to make proper corrections." (Evening and Morning Star, 26 Sept. 1834, p. 192.)

While the revelations were appearing in the Evening and Morning Star, the same manuscripts were being used to print the Book of Commandments. This particular printing involved a long and arduous process. Not only were they using a hand press, but proofsheets had to go over a thousand miles to Kirtland to be checked by the Prophet. Some sheets must have reached him by 1 December 1832 since he spent that day correcting revelations in Kirtland while printing was continuing in Missouri [Evening and Morning Star, Dec. 1832, p. 56; Joseph Smith Journal, 1 Dec. 1832, Church Historical Department Archives].

The next major decision, written in a letter from Sidney Rigdon on 25 June 1833, on behalf of the First Presidency, was not to bind the books--Independence had no binderies and it would take too long to ship them elsewhere. The letter also listed some typographical errors found in the part they'd received. (History of the Church, 1:362-364.) A week later, Sidney Rigdon wrote further instructions about shipping the books to Kirtland, but a mob destroyed the press and burned most of the printed pages less than three weeks later on 20 July 1833. (History of the Church, 1:390.) Several courageous members saved some incomplete copies [see William E. Berrett, Teachings of the Doctrine and Covenants (Salt Lake City: Deseret Sunday School Union, 1968), p. 7; statement by John Taylor, 15 Apr. 1858, Church Historical Department Archives; The Utah Genealogical and Historical Magazine, vol. 12, July 1926, p. 196.)]--up to the middle of verse 36 in our present section 64.

These precious copies were bound and circulated--eagerly quoted by missionaries, and cited officially [see Journal History of the Church, 2 Jan. 1834, Church Historical Department Archives; History of the Church, 2:27; see also History of the Church, 2:129; The Orson Pratt Journals, Elden J. Watson, comp. and publ. (Salt Lake City, 1975), 2 Apr. 1834, p. 38].
 

The Doctrine and Covenants, 1835

Persecution in Missouri did not dampen the Saints' determination to print the Prophet's revelations. In April 1834, Sidney Rigdon was set apart to arrange the "Book of Covenants" for publication; Oliver Cowdery was assigned to aid him as well as to reprint all former issues of the Evening and Morning Star. In September, they were joined by Joseph Smith and Frederick G. Williams [Peter Crawley, "A Bibliography of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in New York, Ohio, and Missouri," BYU Studies 12 (Summer 1972): 487-89, 507-508]. Other elders began gathering funds, and Edmund Bosley even covenanted to consecrate his property to that end. (History of the Church, 2:161.)

While this committee was preparing this edition, Oliver Cowdery was issuing the Kirtland reprint of the Evening and Morning Star. The revelations contained in the reprint were corrected, and since they agree favorably with the same ones later published in the Doctrine and Covenants, he must have been using the same manuscripts that the committee was using.

Some of the revelations were reprinted on handbills or broadsheets in Kirtland, only a few of which have survived. Sections 59, 88, 89, and 101 were printed in December 1833 or January 1834 [History of the Church, 2:51; Kirtland Council Minute Book, Church Historical Department Archives, pp. 74, 76]. Since they seem similar to the texts used in the 1835 edition of the Doctrine and Covenants, they must have been printed because they were judged too important to wait for the publication of that edition. Broadsheets of section 109 were also printed in Kirtland at the time of the temple dedication.

Since the book was to be presented at the conference of 17 August 1835, several priesthood leaders were apparently given unbound copies to read ahead of time. They were then able to testify at the conference to the truthfulness of the revelations. After hearing the testimonies, the whole conference voted, first as quorums, then as a congregation, to accept the book as arranged. Our present section 134 was also unanimously voted into the publication, as was a section on marriage penned by Oliver Cowdery which was deleted from the book in 1876 and replaced by section 132 on the eternal marriage covenant. Members who could not attend the conference were informed by the publication of the high council minutes of 17 August 1834, in the Doctrine and Covenants itself, and in the Latter-day Saints Messenger and Advocate, their Kirtland newspaper [Messenger and Advocate 2(Aug. 1835): 161-64; D&C, 1835 ed., pp. 255-57].

The book was bound in Cleveland and was ready for distribution by the second week in September [W. W. Phelps to Sally Phelps, 16 Sept. 1835, Church Historical Department Archives; Orson Pratt Journals, Nov. 1835, p. 73].

The change of the name from Book of Commandments to Doctrine and Covenants reflected a change in the contents of the book. The Book of Commandments contained only revelations. The Doctrine and Covenants contained the "Lectures on Faith"--seven theological treatises--in the first part, which was titled "On the Doctrine of the Church of the Latter-day Saints"; and the revelations, or "PART SECOND, Covenants and Commandments" in the [page 36] second part. The title, "Doctrine and Covenants," probably came from the titles of the two parts of the book. In 1921 the "Lectures on Faith" were removed from the Doctrine and Covenants, "not because they were called in question, for they are excellent lectures of great value on the the principles of faith, but because they were not revelations." (Hyrum M. Smith and Janne M. Sjodahl, Doctrine and Covenants Commentary, Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1957, p. xvii.)

There were some additional changes made in the Doctrine and Covenants. Some revelations were combined; for example, chapters 17-19 in the Book of Commandments were combined into our section 23; chapters 30-33 became section 30; and chapters 44-47 became section 42. Chapter 28 was combined with another revelation to become our current section 27.

Additional revelations, some of which had been received after the destruction of the press in Missouri, were also included, along with the minutes of the 24 September 1834 high council meeting (which authorized the publication) and the minutes of the 17 August 1835 conference (in which the book was approved). The title page of this edition made it clear the book contained a "careful selection" of Joseph Smith's revelations. A brief preface was also included.

None of the Quorum of the Twelve was present at that August meeting--they were all on missions in the East but W. W. Phelps read into the minutes a testimony from the Quorum of the book's truthfulness [The handwritten minutes in the Kirtland Council Minute Book, pp. 98-106 contain no mention of the testimony, but the published accounts of the minutes record it as read by W. W. Phelps]. This testimony was almost identical to the statement the Prophet Joseph Smith had received by revelation four years earlier during the 1831 conference in which the Brethren approved the Book of Commandments. None of the Quorum objected to his name being attached to this four-year-old document. But William E. McLellin would claim thirty-five years later that the testimony was a forgery and that he could not have had faith in the Doctrine and Covenants, since most of the revelations had been edited from those in the Book of Commandments [The True Latter-day Saints Herald [Plano, Ill.] 19 (1 Aug. 1872): 472; History of the Church, 3:31]. Some dissidents have relied on his testimony without realizing that it totally contradicts his earlier support, recorded before his excommunication and apostasy. He had, as clerk of the Quorum of the Twelve, signed a document citing the Doctrine and Covenants as the basis for a decision. (History of the Church, 2:395.) He was also present at the 1831 conference where the elders put on record their willingness to bear witness to the Book of Commandments. (History of the Church, 2:245; Far West Record, pp. 15-16.)

There were some at the time the book was published who objected to the editing of the revelations [David Whitmer, An Address to All Believers in Christ by a Witness to the Divine Authenticity of the Book of Mormon (Richmond, Missouri: David Whitmer, 1887), pp. 48-52; History of the Church, 2:481], apparently misunderstanding the process of revelation and the principle of "precept upon precept" that the Lord applied as he continued to give new understanding to the Saints. The Church's viewpoint, however, is adequately explained by Elder B. H. Roberts:

"Some of the early revelations first published in the 'Book of Commandments,' in 1833, were revised by the Prophet himself in the way of correcting errors made by the scribes and publishers; and some additional clauses were inserted to throw increased light upon the subjects treated in the revelations, and paragraphs added, to make the principles or instructions apply to officers not in the Church at the time some of the earlier revelations were given." (History of the Church, 1:173.)
 

Editions in 1844, 1845, and 1846

Soon after all the Twelve arrived in England on their missions, they met on 6 April 1840 and voted to publish both the Book of Mormon and the Doctrine and Covenants [Manuscript History of the British Mission, 15, 16 Apr. 1840, Church Historical Department Archives]. The Book of Mormon appeared; the Doctrine and Covenants didn't--probably because the First Presidency announced that in October a new edition was to be published in Nauvoo. (Times and Seasons [Oct. 1840]: 186.) In fact, when the first British edition finally appeared in 1845, it followed the format of an 1844 Nauvoo edition.

That second edition came a little easier than the first. As early as July 1840 Samuel Bent and George W. Harris were assigned as fund raisers; Ebenezer Robinson began stereotyping (a type of printing) the Doctrine and Covenants and the hymnbook sometime between spring and August of 1841; Joseph Smith "read proof" on the new edition in February of 1843; the Quorum of the Twelve voted in November 1843 to raise money for the paper, and on December 5 the Prophet had them send the money to Orson Hyde in the East with an order to buy the paper [History of the Church, 4:164; The Return 2 (July 1890): 302; Wilford Woodruff Journal, 1-4 Feb. 1843, Church Historical Department Archives; History of the Church, 5:264, 273; History of the Church, 6:66, 100].

On 12 June 1844, the Nauvoo Neighbor ran a notice that the Doctrine and Covenants would be ready in about a month, but the assassination of Joseph Smith and the wounding of publisher John Taylor delayed the work. It probably appeared sometime in October 1844, since the Neighbor stopped running the notice after its October 30 issue.

Some changes had been made: eight sections were added, including one written after Joseph Smith's death--sections 103, 105, 112, 119, 124, 127, 128, and 135 in current editions. The minutes of the approving 1835 conference were dropped.

Since stereotyping is a process that produces metal plates, the 1845 and 1846 Nauvoo editions duplicated the 1844 edition. During the exodus from Nauvoo, Church leaders carefully instructed the three trustees left behind in Nauvoo to bring the stereotype plates with them to Winter Quarters, but the plates were never used again and must have been lost [Journal History of the Church, 28 Sept. 1846, pp. 2-3; 11 Nov. 1846, p. 2; 1 Apr. 1847, p. 3, Church Historical Department Archives]. Instead, the Utah Saints imported copies from England in 1854. In fact, until a greatly revised edition was printed in Salt Lake City in 1876, all of the Church's editions of the Doctrine and Covenants were printed in England.
 

British Editions, 1845-1869

As in America, the history of the Doctrine and Covenants was a lively one. When Wilford Woodruff was sent on his second mission to England in 1844, one of his purposes was to publish the Doctrine and Covenants. 16 His mission acquired sudden urgency when he learned that John Greenhow, a member of Sidney Rigdon's break-away Church of Christ, was planning to publish the Doctrine and Covenants in England and thus secure the copyright [Wilford Woodruff Journal, 1-3 Mar. 1845]. Elder Woodruff, in a little over three months, published first and thus kept the copyright in the Church.

This 1845 edition was useful for two reasons: it supplied books for members in Britain, who were hungry for the Prophet's revelations, and it helped deflate slanderous articles that the Church had printed a "secret book" in the United States full of "heresy, blasphemy, slavery and treason" [Manuscript History of the British Mission, 22 June 1841, p. 4].

This edition copied the Nauvoo editions, as did later editions published in 1849, 1852, 1854, 1866, and 1869. From 1852 to 1869, stereotype plates were used.

The 1854 edition was intended for the Saints in Utah and most of the copies were shipped to Saint Louis, then brought west by wagon.

The 1854 edition also established the need for a textual change. Orson Pratt, who was in charge of publishing that edition, discovered that a disaffected member named Charles B. Thomson was publishing a newspaper containing "revelations" he supposedly had received from "Baneemy." Since "Baneemy" was the code name for "the elders" that Joseph Smith had given in Section 105:27, Elder Pratt proposed that the real names be printed in the next edition, thus exposing Thomson [Orson Pratt to Brigham Young, 20 Nov. 1852, Church Historical Department Archives]. Because changes in the stereotype plates would have been so costly, the changes were actually made in the 1876 edition.
 

1876-1880 Editions

Orson Pratt was an important figure in the next stage of the history of the Doctrine and Covenants. In January 1875 he was deep into an extensive revision to divide the sections into verses, add other revelations the Prophet Joseph Smith had received, arrange the sections in chronological order, and add "in parentheses" the real names after the code names--the change he had recommended over twenty years earlier [Historian's Office Journal, 7 July 1874-14 Nov. 1875, p. 70]. He also wrote new introductions to many sections. In all this he was following the counsel given him by President Brigham Young. This edition was ready for distribution in 1876.

The major change, however, was the addition of twenty-six sections. Sections 2 and 13 contain significant historical events; sections 77 and 113 include interpretations of scripture by Joseph Smith; sections 85, 121, 122, and 123 are extracts of letters; section 109 was the dedication prayer for the Kirtland Temple; section 110 recorded the visit of the heavenly beings who appeared in the temple 3 April 1836; sections 116, 129, 130, and 131 were inspired statements by Joseph Smith; section 136 was a revelation Brigham Young received after the Prophet's death; and the greatest number--sections 87, 108, 111, 114, 115, 117, 118, 120, 125, 126, and 132--were revelations included in Joseph Smith's history but never before published in the Doctrine and Covenants.

Orson Pratt was also involved in a project to publish the Doctrine and Covenants in the Deseret alphabet and left Salt Lake on 18 July 1877 to go to England for that purpose. But he returned on 27 September 1877, after learning of Brigham Young's death, and that particular edition never was finished.

However, Orson Pratt returned yet again to England late in 1878 to print a new edition of the Book of Mormon using electrotype plates. The idea of doing an electrotype edition of the Doctrine and Covenants as well came up, and Elder Pratt, President John Taylor, and William Budge, president of the British Mission, corresponded extensively about it [see for example Orson Pratt to John Taylor, 1 Mar 1879, Church Historical Department Archives]. Basically, it would follow the 1876 format, with the addition of an index in place of the table of contents and footnotes. When President Taylor also requested that Elder Pratt include marginal references and footnotes, he called four reliable elders, John Nicholsen, Hugh Findley, John Rider, and Moroni Snow, to help.

Soon, one complete set of electrotype plates was shipped to Salt Lake City, and the first edition published from them in Utah appeared in 1880, a year after the first electrotype British edition.

In the October 1880 general conference, President George Q. Cannon held up copies of the Doctrine and Covenants and the Pearl of Great Price and said, "As there have been additions made … by the publishing of revelations which were not contained in the original edition, it has been deemed wise to submit these books with their contents to the Conference, to see whether the Conference will vote to accept the books and their contents as from God, and binding upon us as a people and as a Church." President Joseph F. Smith so moved, it was seconded, and the congregation voted affirmatively. (Deseret Evening News, 11 Oct. 1880, p. 2, col. 4.)
 

1882-1920 Editions

In the next thirty-eight years, no fewer than twenty-eight printings of the Doctrine and Covenants were made, most from the electrotype plates made in 1879, others in a similar format. Some were bound to make double or triple combinations; some were vest-pocket size; later Salt Lake editions added a concordance--but all of them had a constant text with unaltered footnotes, and the same material could be found on the same page.

When the 1908 edition came from the press, it contained the first addition since Orson Pratt's edition in 1876: President Wilford Woodruff's declaration, the Manifesto, concerning the practice of plural marriage. Most usually, the Manifesto was on a separate page that was glued in; some printings, especially vest-pocket editions, didn't contain the Manifesto as a regular part of the text until the 1921 edition.
 

The 1921 Edition

The next major changes appeared in the 1921 edition. On 18 March 1920, Elder George F. Richards was appointed chairman of a committee to prepare a new edition of the Book of Mormon [George F. Richards Journal (1918-1920), 18 Mar. 1920, Church Historical Department Archives]. That project went to press in December. In March 1921, the First Presidency assigned the same committee to prepare a new edition of the Doctrine and Covenants. The committee, including Elders Anthony W. Ivins, James E. Talmage, Melvin J. Ballard, and Joseph Fielding Smith, worked intensively for another nine months, and the new edition was published in December.

Their revisions reworked the footnotes, expanded the introductory statements at the beginning of the revelations, divided the text into double columns, and deleted the "Lectures on Faith."
 

The 1981 Edition

The edition in use today was published in 1981. It was expanded to include Joseph Smith's Vision of the Celestial Kingdom and Joseph F. Smith's Vision of the Redemption of the Dead--transferred from the Pearl of Great Price--becoming sections 137 and 138, respectively. The statement of the First Presidency regarding the revelation extending the priesthood to 'all worthy male members of the Church,' released 9 June 1978, was also added as Official Declaration--2. President Woodruff's 1890 manifesto remained as Official Declaration--l, and his explanation for issuing the manifesto has also been added.

The new edition of the Doctrine and Covenants, incorporating these additions, also included some alterations. The footnotes were revised according to the format of the footnotes in the LDS edition of the King James Version of the Bible, which had previously been published and distributed to members of the Church. These footnotes included cross-references to the Topical Guide in the Bible. In addition, the introductory statements at the beginning of each section were revised and a gazetteer was included. (For further information, see Bruce T. Harper, "The Church Publishes a new Triple Combination," Ensign, Oct. 1981, p. 8.)

With the publication of this new edition, study of the Doctrine and Covenants enters a new era. Members of the Church now have easier access to the historical and doctrinal setting in which this book of scripture was produced.

 

 

President Benson gave a masterful discourse on the roles of the Book of Mormon and the Doctrine and Covenants for our day.

 

Book of Mormon – Brings man to Christ

 

Doctrine and Covenants – Brings man to Christ’s kingdom (Church)

 

 

The Book of Mormon and the Doctrine and Covenants

President Ezra Taft Benson
Ensign, May 1987, pp. 83-85

[Underling is NOT original.]

My beloved brethren and sisters, I rejoice in this great conference. I am a better man because I was here. I thank the Lord for the great record that has been made. This has been another glorious conference of the Church. I commend to each of you the counsel of these, my brethren, who have spoken to us. I love them and sustain them, and I love the members of the Church everywhere.

I would like to speak about two sacred volumes of modern scripture--the Book of Mormon and the Doctrine and Covenants.

The Book of Mormon and the Doctrine and Covenants are bound together as revelations from Israel's God to gather and prepare His people for the second coming of the Lord.

The bringing forth of these sacred volumes of scripture "for the salvation of a ruined world" cost "the best blood of the nineteenth century"--that of Joseph Smith and his brother Hyrum (D&C 135:6).

Each divine witness contains a great proclamation to all the world--the title page of the Book of Mormon, and section 1, the Lord's preface to the Doctrine and Covenants.

"This generation," said the Lord to Joseph Smith, "shall have my word through you" (D&C 5:10). And so it has through the Book of Mormon, the Doctrine and Covenants, and other modern revelations.

The Book of Mormon and the Doctrine and Covenants testify of each other. You cannot believe one and not the other.

The Book of Mormon testifies of modern books of scripture. It refers to them as "other books" and "last records" which "establish the truth" of the Bible and make known the "plain and precious things which have been taken away" from the Bible (1 Ne. 13:39-40).

Excluding the witnesses to the Book of Mormon, the Doctrine and Covenants is by far the greatest external witness and evidence which we have from the Lord that the Book of Mormon is true. At least thirteen sections in the Doctrine and Covenants give us confirming knowledge and divine witness that the Book of Mormon is the word of God (see D&C 1; D&C 3; D&C 5; D&C 8; D&C 10-11; D&C 17-18; D&C 20; D&C 27; D&C 42; D&C 84; D&C 135).

The Doctrine and Covenants is the binding link between the Book of Mormon and the continuing work of the Restoration through the Prophet Joseph Smith and his successors.

In the Doctrine and Covenants we learn of temple work, eternal families, the degrees of glory, Church organization, and many other great truths of the Restoration.

"Search these commandments," said the Lord of the Doctrine and Covenants, "for they are true and faithful, and the prophecies and promises which are in them shall all be fulfilled.

"What I the Lord have spoken, I have spoken, and I excuse not myself; and though the heavens and the earth pass away, my word shall not pass away, but shall all be fulfilled, whether by mine own voice or by the voice of my servants, it is the same" (D&C 1:37-38).

The Book of Mormon brings men to ChristThe Doctrine and Covenants brings men to Christ's kingdom, even The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, "the only true and living church upon the face of the whole earth" (D&C 1:30). I know that.

The Book of Mormon is the "keystone" of our religion, and the Doctrine and Covenants is the capstone, with continuing latter-day revelation. The Lord has placed His stamp of approval on both the keystone and the capstone.

The ancient preparation of the Book of Mormon, its preservation, and its publication verify Nephi's words that "the Lord knoweth all things from the beginning; wherefore, he prepareth a way to accomplish all his works among the children of men; for behold, he hath all power unto the fulfilling of all his words" (1 Ne. 9:6).

We are not required to prove that the Book of Mormon is true or is an authentic record through external evidences--though there are many. It never has been the case, nor is it so now, that the studies of the learned will prove the Book of Mormon true or false. The origin, preparation, translation, and verification of the truth of the Book of Mormon have all been retained in the hands of the Lord, and the Lord makes no mistakes. You can be assured of that.

God has built in His own proof system of the Book of Mormon as found in Moroni, chapter 10, and in the testimonies of the Three and the Eight Witnesses and in various sections of the Doctrine and Covenants.

We each need to get our own testimony of the Book of Mormon through the Holy Ghost. Then our testimony, coupled with the Book of Mormon, should be shared with others so that they, too, can know through the Holy Ghost of its truthfulness.

Nephi testifies that the Book of Mormon contains the "words of Christ" and that if people "believe in Christ," they will believe in the Book of Mormon (2 Ne. 33:10).

It is important that in our teaching we make use of the language of holy writ. Alma said, "I … do command you in the language of him who hath commanded me" (Alma 5:61).

The words and the way they are used in the Book of Mormon by the Lord should become our source of understanding and should be used by us in teaching gospel principles.

God uses the power of the word of the Book of Mormon as an instrument to change people's lives: "As the preaching of the word had a great tendency to lead the people to do that which was just--yea, it had had more powerful effect upon the minds of the people than the sword, or anything else, which had happened unto them--therefore Alma thought it was expedient that they should try the virtue of the word of God" (Alma 31:5).

Alma reminded his brethren of the Church how God delivered their fathers' souls from hell: "Behold, he changed their hearts; yea, he awakened them out of a deep sleep, and they awoke unto God. Behold, they were in the midst of darkness; nevertheless, their souls were illuminated by the light of the everlasting word" (Alma 5:7).

We need to use the everlasting word to awaken those in deep sleep so they will awake "unto God."

I am deeply concerned about what we are doing to teach the Saints at all levels the gospel of Jesus Christ as completely and authoritatively as do the Book of Mormon and the Doctrine and CovenantsBy this I mean teaching the "great plan of the Eternal God," to use the words of Amulek (Alma 34:9).

Are we using the messages and the method of teaching found in the Book of Mormon and other scriptures of the Restoration to teach this great plan of the Eternal God?

There are many examples of teaching this great plan, but I will quote just one. It is Mormon's summary statement of Aaron's work as a missionary:

"And it came to pass that when Aaron saw that the king would believe his words, he began from the creation of Adam, reading the scriptures unto the king--how God created man after his own image, and that God gave him commandments, and that because of transgression, man had fallen.

"And Aaron did expound unto him the scriptures from the creation of Adam, laying the fall of man before him, and their carnal state and also the plan of redemption, which was prepared from the foundation of the world, through Christ, for all whosoever would believe on his name.

"And since man had fallen he could not merit anything of himself; but the sufferings and death of Christ atone for their sins, through faith and repentance" (Alma 22:12-14).

The Book of Mormon Saints knew that the plan of redemption must start with the account of the fall of Adam. In the words of Moroni, "By Adam came the fall of man. And because of the fall of man came Jesus Christ, … and because of Jesus Christ came the redemption of man" (Morm. 9:12).

Just as a man does not really desire food until he is hungry, so he does not desire the salvation of Christ until he knows why he needs Christ.

No one adequately and properly knows why he needs Christ until he understands and accepts the doctrine of the Fall and its effect upon all mankind. And no other book in the world explains this vital doctrine nearly as well as the Book of Mormon.

Brethren and sisters, we all need to take a careful inventory of our performance and also the performance of those over whom we preside to be sure that we are teaching the "great plan of the Eternal God" to the Saints.

Are we accepting and teaching what the revelations tell us about the Creation, Adam and the fall of man, and redemption from that fall through the atonement of Christ? Do we frequently review the crucial questions which Alma asks the members of the Church in the fifth chapter of Alma in the Book of Mormon?

Do we understand and are we effective in teaching and preaching the Atonement? What personal meaning does the Lord's suffering in Gethsemane and on Calvary have for each of us?

What does redemption from the Fall mean to us? In the words of Alma, do we "sing the song of redeeming love"? (Alma 5:26).

Now, what should be the source for teaching the great plan of the Eternal God? The scriptures, of course--particularly the Book of Mormon. This should also include the other modern-day revelationsThese should be coupled with the words of the Apostles and prophets and the promptings of the Spirit.

Alma "commanded them that they should teach nothing save it were the things which he had taught, and which had been spoken by the mouth of the holy prophets" (Mosiah 18:19).

The Doctrine and Covenants states, "Let them journey from thence preaching the word by the way, saying none other things than that which the prophets and apostles have written, and that which is taught them by the Comforter through the prayer of faith" (D&C 52:9).

Now, after we teach the great plan of the eternal God, we must personally bear our testimonies of its truthfulness.

Alma, after giving a great message to the Saints about being born again and the need for them to experience a "mighty change" in their hearts, sealed his teaching with his testimony in these words:

"And this is not all. Do ye not suppose that I know of these things myself? Behold, I testify unto you that I do know that these things whereof I have spoken are true. And how do ye suppose that I know of their surety?

"Behold, I say unto you they are made known unto me by the Holy Spirit of God. Behold, I have fasted and prayed many days that I might know these things of myself. And now I do know of myself that they are true; for the Lord God hath made them manifest unto me by his Holy Spirit; and this is the spirit of revelation which is in me" (Alma 5:45-46).

Later Amulek joined Alma as his missionary companion. After Alma had delivered to the Zoramites his message concerning faith in Christ, Amulek sealed with his testimony the message of his companion in these words:

"And now, behold, I will testify unto you of myself that these things are true. Behold, I say unto you, that I do know that Christ shall come among the children of men, to take upon him the transgressions of his people, and that he shall atone for the sins of the world; for the Lord God hath spoken it" (Alma 34:8).

In His preface to the Doctrine and Covenants, the Lord said that the "voice of warning shall be unto all people, by the mouths of my disciples, whom I have chosen in these last days" (D&C 1:4).

The responsibility of the seed of Abraham, which we are, is to be missionaries to "bear this ministry and Priesthood unto all nations" (Abr. 2:9). Moses bestowed upon Joseph Smith in the Kirtland Temple the keys to gather Israel (see D&C 110:11).

Now, what is the instrument that God has designed for this gathering? It is the same instrument that is designed to convince the world that Jesus is the Christ that Joseph Smith is His prophet, and that The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is true. It is that scripture which is the keystone of our religion.

It is that most correct book which, if men will abide by its precepts, will get them closer to God than any other book. It is the Book of Mormon (see Introduction to the Book of Mormon).

God bless us all to use all the scriptures, but in particular the instrument He designed to bring us to Christ--the Book of Mormon, the keystone of our religion--along with its companion volume, the capstone, the Doctrine and Covenants, the instrument to bring us to Christ's kingdom, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Now, by virtue of the sacred priesthood in me vested, I invoke the blessings of the Lord upon the Latter-day Saints and upon good people everywhere.

I bless you with added power to endure in righteousness amidst the growing onslaught of wickedness, about which we have heard a great deal during this conference.

I promise you that as you more diligently study modern revelation on gospel subjects, your power to teach and preach will be magnified and you will so move the cause of Zion that added numbers will enter into the house of the Lord as well as the mission field.

I bless you with increased desire to flood the earth with the Book of Mormon, to gather out from the world the elect of God who are yearning for the truth but knows not where to find it.

I promise you that, with increased attendance in the temples of our God, you shall receive increased personal revelation to bless your life as you bless those who have died.

I testify that the Book of Mormon is the word of God. Jesus is the Christ. Joseph Smith is His prophet. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is true, in the name of Jesus Christ, amen.

 

D&C 28:1-3 – The Hiram Page story of a stone which he claimed he could receive revelations.  Oliver believed it hook line and sinker.  The Lord teaches the saints that there is one person only that receives revelation for the church, Joseph.  Oliver was better educated, but was reminded of his place, later; this would drive him out of the church.  The thought of a prophet receiving revelation for the church wasn’t comprehended yet.

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 28:1-3.)

 

1 Behold, I say unto thee, Oliver, that it shall be given unto thee that thou shalt be heard by the church in all things whatsoever thou shalt teach them by the Comforter, concerning the revelations and commandments which I have given.

 

2 But, behold, verily, verily, I say unto thee, no one shall be appointed to receive commandments and revelations in this church excepting my servant Joseph Smith, Jun., for he receiveth them even as Moses.

 

3 And thou shalt be obedient unto the things which I shall give unto him, even as Aaron, to declare faithfully the commandments and the revelations, with power and authority unto the church.

 

 

The Prophet, Seer, and Revelator

(D&C 28 and 43)

 

A. GARY ANDERSON

 

In All Patience and Faith

 

The very foundation of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is the principle of present-day revelation. From the prophet Amos came the declaration that "surely the Lord God will do nothing, but he revealeth his secret unto his servants the prophets" (Amos 3:7). President Spencer W. Kimball declared: "Man never needs to stand alone. Every faithful person may have the inspiration for his own limited kingdom. But the Lord definitely calls prophets today and reveals his secrets unto them as he did yesterday, he does today, and will do tomorrow: that is the way it is." fn The idea of continuous revelation in our present day seemed consistent with the word of God to many early converts to the gospel. One early lesson that needed to be taught to the members of the restored Church was the relationship of the members to the appointed prophet. Thus, on the very day the Church was organized, 6 April 1830, the Lord gave instruction to the early Church members:

 

Wherefore, meaning the church, thou shalt give heed unto all his words and commandments which he shall give unto you as he receiveth them, walking in all holiness before me;

 

For his word ye shall receive, as if from mine own mouth, in all patience and faith.

 

For by doing these things the gates of hell shall not prevail against you; yea, and the Lord God will disperse the powers of darkness from before you, and cause the heavens to shake for your good, and his name's glory (D&C 21:4-6).

 

This revelation seems to point out very clearly the special role of the prophet and the responsibility of Church members to look to that prophet; this, however, was a difficult lesson for Church members to learn and a test of their faith. The Lord warned in a later revelation that enemies would prevail against the Church as long as they did not give heed unto his commandments through his prophet (D&C 103:4-8). Even in more modern times President Harold B. Lee brought this to the attention of the Church in these words:

 

We have some tight places to go before the Lord is through with this church and the world in this dispensation, which is the last dispensation, which shall usher in the coming of the Lord. . . .

 

Now the only safety we have as members of this church is to do exactly what the Lord said to the Church in that day when the Church was organized. We must learn to give heed to the words and commandments that the Lord shall give through his prophet, "as he receiveth them, walking in all holiness before me: . . . as if from my own mouth, in all patience and faith." There will be some things that take patience and faith. You may not like what comes from the authority of the Church. It may contradict your political views. It may contradict your social views. It may interfere with some of your social life. But if you listen to these things, as if from the mouth of the Lord himself, with patience and faith, the promise is that "the gates of hell shall not prevail against you; yea, and the Lord God will disperse the powers of darkness from before you, and cause the heavens to shake for your good, and his name's glory. . . .

 

Your safety and ours depends upon whether or not we follow the ones whom the Lord has placed to preside over his church. He knows whom he wants to preside over this church, and he will make no mistake. . . . Let's keep our eye on the President of the Church. fn

 

The Key Against Deception

 

One of the early members of the Church who was present at the organization of the Church and had shared many revelatory experiences with the Prophet Joseph Smith was Oliver Cowdery. He was one who struggled to understand the role of the prophet in giving revelation to the Church. Just months after the organization of the Church, Joseph Smith received a letter from Oliver Cowdery which gave him both "sorrow and uneasiness." The contents of the letter were as follows, as recorded in the History of the Church:

 

He wrote to inform me that he had discovered an error in one of the commandments—Book of Doctrine and Covenants: (D&C 20:37) "And truly manifest by their works that they have received of the Spirit of Christ unto a remission of their sins."

 

The above quotation, he said, was erroneous, and added: "I command you in the name of God to erase those words, that no priestcraft be amongst us!"

 

I immediately wrote to him in reply, in which I asked him by what authority he took upon him to command me to alter or erase, to add to or diminish from, a revelation or commandment from Almighty God.

 

A few days afterwards I visited him and Mr. Whitmer's family, when I found the family in general of his opinion concerning the words above quoted, and it was not without both labor and perseverance that I could prevail with any of them to reason calmly on the subject. However, Christian Whitmer at length became convinced that the sentence was reasonable, and according to Scripture; and finally, with his assistance, I succeeded in bringing, not only the Whitmer family, but also Oliver Cowdery to acknowledge that they had been in error, and that the sentence in dispute was in accordance with the rest of the commandment. fn

 

Joseph had returned to Harmony, Pennsylvania after this event, but persecution was beginning to develop there as it had in the Palmyra Manchester area earlier. Peter Whitmer, Sr., having heard of the persecutions against the Prophet, invited him and Emma to live with him in Fayette, New York. Newel Knight had taken his wagon from Colesville to Harmony to move the Family. They arrived at Fayette during the last week of August, 1830—as Joseph said, "amidst the congratulations of our brethren and friends." The Prophet then recorded:

 

To our great grief, however, we soon found that Satan had been lying in wait to deceive, and seeking whom he might devour. Brother Hiram Page had in his possession a certain stone, by which he had obtained certain "revelations" concerning the upbuilding of Zion, the order of the Church, etc., all of which were entirely at variance with the order of God's house, as laid down in the New Testament, as well as in our late revelations. As a conference meeting had been appointed for the 26th day of September, I thought it wisdom not to do much more than to converse with the brethren on the subject, until the conference should meet. Finding, however, that many especially the Whitmer family and Oliver Cowdery, were believing much in the things set forth by this stone, we thought best to inquire of the Lord concerning so important a matter; and before conference, we received the following." fn

 

Doctrine and Covenants 28 was then recorded. Joseph had been quick to recognize that this whole affair was contrary to the New Testament and previous revelations he had received. This revelation recognized the Prophet as the man like unto Moses, which is also affirmed in later revelations (D&C 103:15-16; 107:92). Newel Knight described the events connected with this matter in his personal journal:

 

[Page] had managed to get up some discussions of feeling among the brethren by giving revelations concerning the government of the Church and other matters, which he claimed to have received through the medium of a stone he possessed. . . . Even Oliver Cowdery and the Whitmer family had given heed to them. . . . Joseph was perplexed and scarcely knew how to meet this new exigency. That night I occupied the same room that he did and the greater part of the night was spent in prayer and supplication. After much labor with these brethren they were convinced of their error, and confessed the same, renouncing [Page's] revelations as not being of God. fn

 

The Lord then commanded Joseph in the revelation to "take thy brother, Hiram Page, between him and thee alone, and tell him that those things which he hath written from that stone are not of me and that Satan deceiveth him" (D&C 28:11). This then becomes a key against deception for the Church. Oliver was recognized by the Lord as the second Elder in the Church, but the Church must learn this important lesson as reiterated by Joseph Smith in these words: "I will inform you that it is contrary to the economy of God for any member of the Church, or anyone, to receive instructions for those in authority, higher than themselves; therefore, you will see the impropriety of giving heed to them; but if any person have a vision or a visitation from a heavenly messenger, it must be for his own benefit and instruction, for the fundamental principles, government, and doctrine of the church are vested in the keys of the kingdom." fn

 

The proposed conference of the Church was convened on 26 September 1830, in which Hiram Page's revelation was discussed: "The subject of the stone previously mentioned was discussed, and after considerable investigation, Brother Page, as well as the whole Church who were present, renounced the said stone, and all things connected therewith, much to our mutual satisfaction and happiness." fn The Spirit of the Lord was strongly felt at the conference and several revelations were given.

 

The Lord showed further concern in these revelations that members of the Church remember the lessons learned from these events in Fayette. He cautioned David Whitmer in these words: "You have not given heed unto my Spirit, and to those who were set over you, but have been persuaded by those whom I have not commanded" (D&C 30:2). And again to the missionaries who were sent out to preach the gospel to the Lamanites the Lord said: "And they shall give heed to that which is written, and pretend to no other revelation; and they shall pray always that I may unfold the same to their understanding" (D&C 32:4). These were all gentle reminders to look to the Lord and his prophet for guidance and direction in order to avoid confusion and deception. Later missionaries were cautioned to preach "none other things than that which the prophets and apostles have written" (D&C 52:9, 36).

 

The Church was slow to learn this lesson concerning revelation for the Church coming only to the Prophet. It was less than six months later in Kirtland, just after the Lord had revealed his law to the Church (D&C 42), that the following transpired, as recorded in the History of the Church

This woman's name, according to the history of the Church kept by John Whitmer, was Hubble. "She professed to be a prophetess of the Lord, and professed to have many revelations, and knew the Book of Mormon was true, and that she should become a teacher in the church of Christ. She appeared to be very sanctimonious and deceived some who were not able to detect her in her hypocrisy; others, however, had the spirit of discernment and her follies and abominations were manifest." fn

 

Ezra Booth, an early apostate to the Church, gave us added insight with respect to the purported Hubble revelation:

 

A female, professing to be a prophetess, made her appearance in Kirtland and so ingratiated herself into the esteem and favor of some of the Elders that they received her as a person commissioned to act a conspicuous part in Mormonizing the world. Rigdon, and some others, gave her the righthand of fellowship, and literally saluted her with what they called the 'kiss' of charity. But [Joseph] Smith . . . declared her an imposter, and she returned to the place whence she came. Her visit, however, made a deep impression on the minds of many, and the barbed arrow which she left in the hearts of some, is not as yet eradicated. fn

 

Continual reference has been made to these revelations to prevent members of the Church from being deceived. In 1972 President Harold B. Lee reminded the Saints of these early events as he warned the Church by quoting a statement of the First Presidency given in 1913:

From the days of Hiram Page at different periods there have been manifestations from delusive spirits to members of the Church. . . .

 

When visions, dreams, tongues, prophecy, impressions or an extraordinary gift or inspiration convey something out of harmony with the accepted revelations of the Church or contrary to the decisions of its constituted authorities, Latter-day Saints may know that it is not of God, no matter how plausible it may appear. Also, they should understand that direction for the guidance of the Church will come, by revelation, through the head. All faithful members are entitled to the inspiration of the Holy Spirit for themselves, their families, and for those over whom they are appointed and ordained to preside. But anything at discord with that which comes from God through the head of the Church is not to be received as authoritative or reliable. In secular as well as spiritual affairs, Saints may receive Divine guidance and revelation affecting themselves, but this does not convey authority to direct others, and is not to be accepted when contrary to Church covenants, doctrine or discipline, or to known facts, demonstrated truths, or good common sense. No person has the right to induce his fellow members of the Church to engage in speculations or take stock in ventures of any kind on the specious claim of Divine revelation or vision or dream, especially when it is in opposition to the voice of recognized authority, local or general. The Lord's Church "is a house of order." It is not governed by individual gifts or manifestations, but by the order and power of the Holy Priesthood as sustained by the voice and vote of the Church in its appointed conferences.

 

The history of the Church records many pretended revelations claimed by imposters or zealots who believed in the manifestations they sought to lead other persons to accept, and in every instance, disappointment, sorrow and disaster have resulted therefrom. Financial loss and sometimes utter ruin have followed. fn

 

The Lord in section 43 promises protection against deception as the Saints meet together and are instructed and edified by inspired leaders and are admonished to bind themselves to these things and thus be sanctified (D&C 43:8-11). They are to support the Lord's prophet both temporally and by the prayer of faith (D&C 43:12-14). The Lord concludes this revelation by admonishing the elders to teach the truth to the world and prepare for his Second Coming (D&C 43:15-28). He also reminds them that at the day of the Second Coming there will be none to deliver them if they have not believed the prophet (cf. D&C 133:71). The warning seems clear that proper preparations for the Second Coming consists in looking to and obeying his servants, the prophets.

 

The Power of God Unto Salvation

 

When the decision was made in the November conference of the Church in 1831 to compile the revelations given to the early Church, the Lord gave another revelation which was to be the Preface to the Book of Commandments. Again the Lord stressed the importance of listening to and obeying the words of his prophet and other leaders in these words:

 

And the arm of the Lord shall be revealed; and the day cometh that they who will not hear the voice of the Lord, neither the voice of his servants, neither give heed to the words of the prophets and apostles, shall be cut off from among the people . . . . What I the Lord have spoken, I have spoken, and I excuse not myself; and though the heavens and the earth pass away, my word shall not pass away, but shall all be fulfilled, whether by mine own voice or by the voice of my servants, it is the same (D&C 1:14, 38)

 

Perhaps this is why President Harold B. Lee said: "That person is not truly converted until he sees the power of God resting upon the leaders of this Church, and until it goes down into his heart like fire." fn

 

The Lord in another revelation given in November 1831 further emphasized the importance of the inspired words of his living servants: "And this is the ensample unto them, that they shall speak as they are moved upon by the Holy Ghost. And whatsoever they shall speak when moved upon by the Holy Ghost shall be scripture, shall be the mind of the Lord, shall be the word of the Lord, shall be the voice of the Lord, and the power of God unto salvation" (D&C 68:34). When the servants of the Lord, speaking within their assigned stewardship, are moved upon by the Holy Ghost, then we have received scripture. President Spencer W. Kimball made these remarks at the conclusion of a general conference: "Let us hearken to those we sustain as prophets, and seers, as well as the other brethren, as if our eternal life depended upon it, because it does!" fn Certainly our salvation is at stake if we fail to be in tune with the Holy Ghost which enables us to know when our leaders are moved upon by the Holy Ghost.

 

When Frederick G. Williams was called as a counselor in the First Presidency of the Church in 1833, the Lord again emphasized the importance of his word given to his prophet: "Verily I say unto you, the keys of this kingdom shall never be taken from you, while thou art in the world, neither in the world to come; Nevertheless, through you shall the oracles be given to another, yea, even unto the church. And all they who receive the oracles of God, let them beware how they hold them lest they are accounted as a light thing, and are brought under condemnation thereby, and stumble and fall when the storms descend, and winds blow, and the rains descend, and beat upon their house" (D&C 90:3-5). This revelation is certainly a key in interpreting what the Lord was trying to say when he concluded the Sermon of the Mount with the story of the man who built his house on sand (Matt. 7:24-27). His children are on shaky ground when they take lightly the words of his prophet.

 

In the midst of apostasy in the trying Kirtland years, the Lord reminded the Church of the importance of the First Presidency: "Whosoever receiveth me, receiveth the First Presidency" (D&C 112:20). President Marion G. Romney said, "What they say as a presidency is what the Lord would say if he were here in person." fn The Saints again in Nauvoo were told that they could not be blessed if they did not hearken unto the voice of his servants (D&C 124:45-46). And in the same revelation Alman W. Babbitt was rebuked for rejecting the counsel of the First Presidency (D&C 124:84). The warning of the Lord to those who were responsible for the martyrdom of the Lord's prophet, Joseph Smith, should not go unnoticed (D&C 136:34-36). President Ezra Taft Benson stated: "The prophet and the presidency— the living prophet and the First Presidency—follow them and be blessed—reject them and suffer." fn President Benson further stated that the prophet is the only man who speaks for the Lord in everything. He substantiated this thought with D&C 132:7: "There is never but one on the earth at a time on whom this power and the keys of this priesthood are conferred."

 

Conclusion

 

From the day of the organization of the Church in 1830 the Lord has taught and emphasized the importance of his servants; he has carefully defined the special role of the Prophet and President of the Church in receiving guidance and revelation for the entire Church. That theme has been echoed and re-echoed throughout the revelations in the Doctrine and Covenants. The Lord even said that all that his Father promised to him could be shared by the Saints if they were true to the covenant of the priesthood. Notice, however, that this is predicated upon these words: "And also all they who receive this priesthood receive me, saith the Lord; For he that receiveth my servants receiveth me; And he that receiveth me receiveth my Father" (D&C 84:35-39). Certainly our happiness and exaltation depend on following the Lord through his prophets.

 

Notes The Prophet, Seer, and Revelator

 

1. Conference Report, April 1977, p. 115; Ensign, May 1977, p. 78.

 

2. Ibid., October 1970, pp. 152-53; Improvement Era, December 1970, pp. 126-27.

 

3. HC 1:105.

 

4. Ibid., 1:108-10.

 

5. Lyndon W. Cook, The Revelations of the Prophet Joseph Smith (Provo: Seveney's Mission Bookstore, 1981), pp. 3940.

 

6. HC 1:338.

 

7. Ibid., p. 115.

 

8. Ibid., p. 154.

 

9. Ibid., footnote.

 

10. Cook, The Revelations, pp. 61-62.

 

11. Conference Report, October 1972, pp. 125-26; Ensign, December 1972.

 

12. Ensign, July 1972, p. 103.

 

13. Conference Report, April 1978, p. 117; Ensign, May 1978, p. 77.

 

14. Ibid., April 1945, p. 90.

 

15. "Fourteen Fundamentals in Following the Prophet," 1980 Devotional Speeches of the Year (Provo, Ut.: Brigham Young University Press, 1980), p. 29.

 

 

(Robert L. Millet and Kent P. Jackson, eds., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 1: The Doctrine and Covenants [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1989], 148.)

 

D&C 27:1-4 – August 1, 1830, 5-18 – September 4, 1830, preparing them for D&C 89

 

D&C 28:7 – Looking ahead to D&C 110

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 28:7.)

 

7 For I have given him the keys of the mysteries, and the revelations which are sealed, until I shall appoint unto them another in his stead.

 

 

We had a long discussion about the various corrections and editions of the Book of Mormon.  There wasn’t any punctuation or chapters and verses, these were done during publishing and later worked on by Joseph, Orson Pratt, who took the book to England for printing.  The reason being, there were 2 different editions floating around, one in America, another in England.   Another edition was completed by Elder Talmage, and the 1981 edition we have today, which is as close to the original intent as we can get at the present time.

 

 

"The Most Correct of Any Book on Earth"

 

The earliest edition of the Book of Mormon came from the press during the week of 18-25 March 1830, in Palmyra, New York. Readers familiar with this edition know that the punctuation is sparse and that paragraphs run to great length. The flow of thought is rather easy, but the sentences are often long and awkward.

 

The second edition came from the press in 1837 in Kirtland, Ohio. This edition, a revision of the first, contains thousands of punctuation changes as well as hundreds of word changes. Most of the corrections are grammatical and stylistic, although some involve changes in wording designed to clarify meaning. Many of the corrections, but not all, are based on a comparison with the handwritten Oliver Cowdery manuscript that was used as the source for the first printing. As with most first editions, the 1830 edition contained typographical errors that needed correcting, and the 1837 edition incorporates these corrections. The Prophet later used a printed copy of the 1837 edition as a basis for making some additional revisions and technical corrections. This edited copy partially formed the basis for the third edition of October 1840, printed in Cincinnati, Ohio. Thus when the Prophet said in November 1841 that the Book of Mormon was the most correct book on earth, we must keep in mind that he was speaking of the then current third edition. In any case, he no doubt had reference to the contents-the doctrines and teachings-of the Book of Mormon rather than to its grammatical construction, punctuation, and spelling.

 

Let us be quick to observe that these various editorial changes did not alter the central message of the book in any edition; they were minor, not major, revisions. However, from time to time critics have raised the question of the "perfection" of the Book of Mormon in light of the many editorial touches. In reply, it seems only reasonable that we at least point out that the Prophet was speaking from the context of 1841. The message of the Book of Mormon is the same no matter what edition one uses, but knowing the context of the Prophet's statement tends to blunt what might at first look like a sharp edge of the critics' attack.

 

 

(Robert J. Matthews, A Bible! A Bible! [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1990], 85 - 87.)

 

 

 

Some Conclusions

 

1. The Book of Mormon has been subject to problems in its printing, as have other books.

 

2. The English language in America was not standardized in 1829.

 

3. The original grammar was Joseph's; the spelling was Oliver's; the punctuation was John H. Gilbert's.

 

4. The Prophet-Translator initiated the majority of changes in the first few editions.

 

5. There is a difference between word changes and idea changes—the basic meaning of the text has not been changed.

 

Based on his letter to W. W. Phelps in 1833, his 1837 and 1840 editions, his statement in 1842, and his 1842 edition (all previously referred to), it is clear that had Joseph lived longer, he would likely have continued to correct the text of the Book of Mormon to produce a book without human errors. It has been in this same spirit that corrections have been made in succeeding editions.

 

Some of the sharpest detractors of the Book of Mormon translation have confessed that "as we stated earlier, most of the 3,913 changes which we found were related to the correction of grammatical and spelling errors and do not really change the basic meaning of the text." fn This reminds us of a statement the Prophet Joseph made when he was criticized in 1834 for "glaring errors" in a published revelation. He replied that shades of meaning or literary mechanics were not as important as the general message: "We did not think so much of orthography [spelling], or the manner, as we did the subject matter, as the word of God means what it says." fn

 

"The Most Correct Book"

 

Even before the 1981 edition was published, a careful student of the original manuscript and printer's copy said, "A great value of these early manuscripts is that for the most part they substantiate the correctness of the present Book of Mormon text—fully 99.9% of the text is published correctly." fn

 

Notwithstanding the fact that this sacred Nephite witness of Jesus Christ already towers far above many of the other scriptures in the integrity of its text, still the Church has endeavored to make it even more correct, as is shown by the following statement about the 1981 edition: "Some minor errors in the text have been perpetuated in past editions of the Book of Mormon. This edition contains corrections that seem appropriate to bring the material into conformity with prepublication manuscripts and early editions edited by the Prophet Joseph Smith." fn The changes and corrections are not only correct but appropriate. fn

 

When Joseph Smith said "the Book of Mormon was the most correct of any book on earth," it seems evident that he was not talking about grammar, fn punctuation, or spelling. He was referring to the clarity and depth of doctrine, to the mission and message of the book, to the spirit of inspiration that it fosters, to the divine desire that it sparks in the soul to make the "mighty change," and to the abiding love of the Lord that it brings into our hearts. All of these correct things help make the Book of Mormon just exactly what the Prophet said it was: "The most correct of any book on earth, and the keystone of our religion, and a man would get nearer to God by abiding by its precepts, than by any other book." fn

 

The Lord himself has similarly testified with a solemn oath—"And he [Joseph] has translated the book, even that part which I have commanded him, and as your Lord and your God liveth it is true" (D&C 17:6).

 

 

(Paul R. Cheesman, ed., The Book of Mormon: The Keystone Scripture [Provo: BYU Religious Studies Center, 1988], 252.)

 

Joseph lamented the lack of record keeping that was done in the early days of the church, D&C 128:20, describes 2 events without dates or a history recorded.

 

 

We had a discussion about priesthood, the offices, authority, keys, etc.  Without keys, nothing happens, no meetings, no ordinations, etc, see web site.

 

Joseph and the 3 witnesses were apostles but never served in the Quorum of the 12, however, they had to have the office to call others to the Quorum.

 

 

Priesthood – The power of God

Authority – Gods delegated power to man

Keys – Right to direct priesthood authority

Offices – Delegated responsibilities in the priesthood

Quorums – Brotherhood, Fraternity who share responsibilities of that office together

Callings – A Stewardship within the priesthood

Ordinances – 1 Essential for salvation, sacred ritual settings in which covenants are made that enact various aspects of the Atonement in our lives, officiated by priesthood authority, by those who hold the keys.  2 Ordinances not of salvation, blessings, dedications, given for instruction and comfort

 

Melchizedek Priesthood                                                               Aaronic Priesthood

 

Apostle              General                                                            Bishop

Seventy                                                                                     Priest

                                                                                                                                Teacher

Patriarch                                                                                   Deacon

High Priest         Local

Elder

 

 

What Every Elder Should Know--
and Every Sister as Well:
A Primer on Principles of Priesthood Government

Elder Boyd K. Packer
Of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles
Ensign, Feb. 1993, pp. 7-13

Because elders cannot receive the fulness of the blessings of the priesthood without the sisters, it was thought the sisters, too, could benefit from these excerpts from a talk given at a training session of the General Authorities at general conference, April 1992.
 

Less than a year after the Church was organized, the Prophet Joseph Smith received a revelation which said:

"Hearken, O ye elders of my church whom I have called, behold I give unto you a commandment, that ye shall assemble yourselves together to agree upon my word;

"And by the prayer of your faith ye shall receive my law, that ye may know how to govern my church and have all things right before me." (D&C 41:2-3.)

There are some things about the priesthood that every elder should know if he is to understand how the Church is governed to have things right before the Lord. There are principles and precepts and rules which are often overlooked and seldom taught.

Some of these principles are found in the scriptures, others in the handbooks. Some of them are not found in either. They are found in the Church. You might call them traditions, but they are more than that. They are revelations which came when the Brethren of the past assembled themselves, agreed upon His word, and offered their prayers of faith.

The Lord then showed them what to do. They received by revelation, "line upon line, precept upon precept," true principles which form the priesthood way of doing things. (See Isa. 28:13; 2 Ne. 28:30; D&C 98:12.) These are things we do to have things right before the Lord.

The Priesthood

Priesthood is the authority and the power which God has granted to men on earth to act for Him. (See JST, Gen. 14:28-31.) When we exercise priesthood authority properly, we do what He would do if He were present.


The Melchizedek or Higher Priesthood

There are in the Church two priesthoods, namely, the Melchizedek and Aaronic, including the Levitical Priesthood. The first is called the Melchizedek Priesthood because Melchizedek was such a great high priest: "Before his day it was called the Holy Priesthood, after the Order of the Son of God." (D&C 107:1-3.)

The Melchizedek Priesthood is also spoken of in the scriptures as the "greater priesthood" or the priesthood "which is after the holiest order of God" (D&C 84:18-19) and the priesthood "after the order of mine Only Begotten Son" (D&C 124:123; see also D&C 76:57).

"Out of respect or reverence to the name of the Supreme Being, to avoid the too frequent repetition of his name, they, the church, in ancient days, called that priesthood after Melchizedek, or the Melchizedek Priesthood." (D&C 107:4.) We can understand why that should be. The name of the priesthood is frequently talked about in meetings and lessons and is printed in handbooks and manuals. It would be irreverent to use informally the sacred title which includes the name of Deity.

Melchizedek, the great high priest, is identified in the scriptures as the "king of Salem" or, as we would say today, Jerusalem. (Gen. 14:18; Alma 13:17-18.) "And it was this same Melchizedek to whom Abraham paid tithes." (Alma 13:15; see also Gen. 14:20.)

There are references to a patriarchal priesthood. The patriarchal order is not a third, separate priesthood. (See D&C 84:6-17; D&C 107:40-57.) Whatever relates to the patriarchal order is embraced in the Melchizedek Priesthood. "All other authorities or offices in the church are appendages to [the Melchizedek] priesthood." (D&C 107:5.) The patriarchal order is a part of the Melchizedek Priesthood which enables endowed and worthy men to preside over their posterity in time and eternity.


The Aaronic or Lesser Priesthood

"The second priesthood is called the Priesthood of Aaron, because it was conferred upon Aaron and his [page 8] seed. … It is called the lesser priesthood … because it is an appendage to the greater, or the Melchizedek Priesthood, and has power in administering outward ordinances." (D&C 107:13-14.)

It is sometimes called the preparatory priesthood because it prepares one for the higher priesthood.

The Levitical Priesthood (see Heb. 7:11; D&C 107:6, 10) is an order in or a part of the Aaronic Priesthood. Moses and Aaron belonged to the tribe of Levi. (See Ex. 2:1-2, 10; Ex. 4:14.) During the exodus from Egypt, the Levites were given priestly responsibilities concerning the tabernacle and always camped nearest to it. (See Num. 3:5-39.) While the Levitical order does not function today, its privileges and authority are embraced within the Aaronic Priesthood for whatever future use the Lord may direct.


The Keys of the Priesthood

There are keys of the priesthood. While the word key has other meanings, like keys of wisdom or keys of knowledge, the keys of the priesthood are the right to preside and direct the affairs of the Church within a jurisdiction. All priesthood keys are within The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, and no keys exist outside the Church on earth.


Apostles

All men who are ordained Apostles and sustained as members of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles have all priesthood keys conferred upon them. (See D&C 27:13; D&C 110:11-16; D&C 112:30.)

The President of the Church is the only person on earth who has the right to exercise all the keys in their fulness. (See D&C 132:7.) He receives authority by setting apart by the Twelve Apostles.

"The power and authority of the higher, or Melchizedek Priesthood, is to hold the keys of all the spiritual blessings of the church. …

"The power and authority of the lesser, or Aaronic Priesthood, is to hold the keys of the ministering of angels, and to administer in outward ordinances, the letter of the gospel, the baptism of repentance for the remission of sins, agreeable to the covenants and commandments." (D&C 107:18, 20.)

Keys are conferred upon a man when he is set apart to be a president, such as a president of a stake, of a quorum, or as a bishop. Counselors do not receive keys.


The Priesthood Is Not Divisible

The priesthood is greater than any of its offices. When someone first receives the Aaronic or Melchizedek Priesthood, it is conferred upon them by the laying on of hands. After the priesthood has been conferred upon him, he is ordained to an office in the priesthood. All offices derive their authority from the priesthood.

The priesthood is not divisible. An elder holds as much priesthood as an Apostle. (See D&C 20:38.) When a man receives the priesthood, he receives all of it. However, there are offices within the priesthood--divisions of authority and responsibility. One may exercise his priesthood according to the rights of the office to which he is ordained or set apart.

"The Melchizedek Priesthood holds the right of presidency, and has power and authority over all the offices in the church in all ages of the world, to administer in spiritual things." (D&C 107:8.)

Whoever holds the Melchizedek Priesthood or higher priesthood holds all of the authority of the Aaronic or lesser priesthood as well.


The Ordained Offices in the Aaronic Priesthood

The ordained offices in the Aaronic Priesthood are:

Deacon
Teacher
Priest

The bishop is the president of the Aaronic Priesthood. He has the keys conferred upon him at the time of his ordination. He delegates responsibility to [page 9] his counselors. The three of them form the bishopric, which is a presidency. (See D&C 107:15-17.)

The Ordained Offices in the Melchizedek Priesthood

The ordained offices in the higher priesthood are:

Elder
High Priest
Patriarch
Seventy
Apostle

Besides identifying a specific ordained office in the Melchizedek Priesthood, the title "elder" is used to identify anyone holding the higher priesthood. Therefore Seventies and Apostles may be referred to as "elder." (See D&C 20:38.)

While all who have had the Melchizedek Priesthood conferred upon them receive the full priesthood, sometimes one office is spoken of as being "higher than" or "lower than" another office. Rather than "higher" or "lower," offices in the Melchizedek Priesthood represent different areas of service.

There are different rights, privileges, and authorities which expand with each succeeding office. For instance, the offices of teacher or priest are spoken of as being higher than the office of deacon. A priest in the Aaronic Priesthood can perform any duty assigned to the teachers or deacons. For example, a priest may pass the sacrament, a duty usually assigned to deacons. A deacon, on the other hand, cannot bless the sacrament nor perform baptisms, duties which are assigned to priests.

An elder can perform any duty assigned to any office in the Aaronic Priesthood, but he cannot do some things which belong to the office of high priest. These principles of priesthood government are established by revelation and do not change.


Quorums

In the dispensation of the fulness of times, the Lord instructed that the priesthood should be organized into quorums, meaning selected assemblies of brethren given authority that His business might be transacted and His work proceed.

A quorum is a brotherhood. Except for the offices of bishop and patriarch, those ordained to offices in the priesthood are organized into quorums.

Though one may be called to and released from ecclesiastical assignments for which one is set apart, membership in a quorum is a steady, sustaining citizenship. It becomes a right of one ordained to an office in the priesthood. And the holding of the priesthood, including the attendant membership in the quorum, is to be regarded as a sacred privilege.

Melchizedek Priesthood quorums are:

• The First Presidency
• The Quorum of the Twelve
• Seventies quorums
• High priests quorums
• Elders quorums

 

Aaronic Priesthood quorums are:

 

• Priests quorums
• Teachers quorums
• Deacons quorums

Each quorum is presided over by a president or a presidency. The Quorum of the Twelve is presided over by one president, the President of the Twelve (see D&C 124:127), as is the priests quorum presided over by the bishop (see D&C 107:87-88).

The seventies quorums are presided over by seven presidents. (See D&C 107:93.) All other quorums are presided over by a presidency consisting of a president, a first counselor, and a second counselor.


The Oath and Covenant of the Priesthood

There is an oath and covenant of the priesthood. The covenant rests with man; the oath with God. The Melchizedek Priesthood is received by covenant. A man's covenant with God is to: be faithful and [page 10] magnify his callings in the priesthood; give heed to the words of eternal life; and to live by every word that proceedeth forth from the mouth of God. (See D&C 84:33, 43, 44.)

God, for his part, declares with an everlasting oath that all who receive the priesthood and obey the covenants that pertain to that priesthood shall receive "all that [the] Father hath." (See D&C 84:38.)

"And this is according to the oath and covenant which belongeth to the priesthood.

"Therefore, all those who receive the priesthood, receive this oath and covenant of my Father, which he cannot break, neither can it be moved." (D&C 84:39-40.)


Ordination and Setting Apart

There are two ways authority is conferred in the Church: by ordination and by setting apart. Offices in the priesthood--deacon, teacher, priest, elder, high priest, patriarch, seventy, and Apostle--always come by ordination. The keys of presidency and the authority to act in callings in the priesthood are received by setting apart.

For instance, the office of elder in the Melchizedek Priesthood is an ordained office, but the office of president of an elders quorum is an office to which one is set apart rather than ordained. In either case, he is given a blessing to accompany his service in an office to which he is ordained or set apart.

There are many "set apart" offices in the Church in both the priesthood and the auxiliary organizations. Some duties are inherent in the priesthood, and one need not be set apart to do them. Visiting the homes of members (home teaching) is an example.

Because women are not ordained to the priesthood, when sisters are set apart to offices, including the office of president in an auxiliary, they receive authority, responsibility, and blessings connected with the office, but they do not receive keys.


Limits to Authority

Ordinarily, the privileges connected with an ordination to the priesthood may be exercised anywhere in the Church. Priesthood holders need no prior authorization to perform ordinances or blessings that are not recorded on the records of the Church, such as consecrating oil, administering to the sick, and giving fathers' blessings.

The priesthood is always regulated by those who have the keys, and an ordinance must be authorized by the presiding authority who holds the proper keys and priesthood if the ordinance is to be recorded on the records of the Church.

Authority connected to an office to which one is set apart has limits, including geographic ones. The authority of a man set apart as president of a stake is limited to the boundaries of that stake. He is not a stake president to members in a neighboring stake, nor is a bishop the bishop over members outside his ward. When a man is ordained a bishop, he is also set apart to preside in a specific ward and has no authority outside its boundaries. When he is released as bishop of that ward, he may still hold the ordained office of bishop, but he cannot function unless he is set apart again to preside over a ward.

When a patriarch is ordained, he is set apart to give blessings to members of his own stake or to those who come into the boundaries of his stake with a recommend from proper authority from a stake where there is no patriarch. These principles of priesthood government are established by revelations.


Usual Age at the Time of Call to Priesthood Offices

So that there may be order in advancement in the priesthood, a minimum age is set for receiving the priesthood and for ordination to [page 11] each succeeding office within the priesthood.

The Aaronic Priesthood is conferred upon a young man when he is ordained a deacon at age twelve or older. He then joins a quorum of up to twelve deacons. (See D&C 107:85.) When he is fourteen, he may be ordained to the office of teacher. He then joins a quorum of up to twenty-four teachers. (See D&C 107:86.) When he is sixteen, he may be ordained a priest. He then joins a quorum of up to forty-eight priests. (See D&C 107:87.) When he is eighteen or older, he may have the Melchizedek Priesthood conferred upon him and be ordained an elder. He then joins a quorum of up to ninety-six elders.

The revelations state that "duty of the president over the office of elders is to preside over ninety-six elders, and to sit in council with them, and to teach them according to the covenants." (D&C 107:89.) The high priests have no specific age and there is no specific number in a high priests quorum. High priests are organized into groups with group leaders. The stake presidency is the presidency of the high priests quorum in the stake.

Calls to Office

In the Church we do not assume authority belonging to either an ordained or a set apart office or calling. We must be called to a position and sustained, be ordained or set apart and given authority. The fifth Article of Faith says, "We believe that a man must be called of God, by prophecy, and by the laying on of hands by those who are in authority, to preach the Gospel and administer in the ordinances thereof." (A of F 1:5.)

Every elder should know that a call is more than an invitation or a request, even more than an assignment. Too frequently we hear such expressions as, "I have been asked to serve as a counselor in the elders quorum presidency." It would be more proper to say, "I have been called to serve as a counselor."

We do not call ourselves to offices in the Church. Rather we respond to the call of those who preside over us. It is the responsibility of those who preside to prayerfully consult the Lord as to His will concerning a position in the Church. Then the principle of revelation is at work. The call is then delivered by the presiding officer who is acting for the Lord.

We do not, under ordinary circumstances, refuse a call. Neither do we ask for a release beyond calling to the attention of the presiding officer circumstances which may make a release advisable.

When we refer to those who have been called to a presiding position by the title of their office such as bishop or president, it lends dignity to the office and reminds the one holding it of his sacred responsibility and it reminds us of our obligation to follow their counsel and respond to their calls.

Sustaining in an Office

The Aaronic or Melchizedek priesthoods are not conferred, nor is one ordained or set apart to an office in either priesthood, unless he is willing to live the standards of worthiness. Those standards include moral purity, the payment of tithes, keeping the Word of Wisdom, and general standards of Christian conduct.

He must be called by those who have the proper authority, and sustained, or voted on, in an appropriate meeting, and ordained or set apart by one who has the authority. This is called "common consent," or the voice of the people. (See D&C 41:9.) This follows the instructions given in revelation:

"Again I say unto you, that it shall not be given to any one to go forth to preach my gospel, or to build up my church, except he be ordained by some one who has authority, and it is known to the church that he has authority and has been regularly ordained by the heads of the church." (D&C 42:11.)

Notice that there are two requirements: First, we must receive authority from someone who has it and has been ordained by the heads of the Church. Next, [page 12] it must be known in the Church that he has the authority.

The sustaining in the priesthood and the setting apart to office is done openly where it can be known to the Church who has authority, as the scriptures require.

There is great safety to the Church in having the names of those called to offices in the Church presented in the proper meeting. (See D&C 20:65.) Anyone who is a pretender or a deceiver will be recognized. If someone claims to have been secretly ordained to a special calling or higher order of the priesthood, you may know immediately that the claim is false!

The names of those to be ordained to the Melchizedek Priesthood or to another office in the Melchizedek Priesthood are presented in stake or district conferences. (A district in a mission is like a stake. A branch in a stake or district is like a ward.) The congregation is asked to approve the ordination by raising the right hand, or, if opposed to the ordination, they may signify by the same sign. This occurs in a stake meeting because the stake presidency presides over the Melchizedek Priesthood.

In an emergency, for instance if a young man is leaving for a mission and has not been ordained an elder, the stake presidency should have his name presented for sustaining in his own ward sacrament meeting. The ordination is then presented for ratification at the first appropriate stake meeting. Only in an emergency would this process be followed; otherwise it is not in order.

Advancements in the Aaronic Priesthood are sustained in ward meetings because the bishopric presides over the Aaronic Priesthood. Members called to positions in the auxiliary organizations are also sustained before being set apart in the appropriate stake or ward meeting.

The bishop, as the common judge, presides over all members of his ward, including holders of the Melchizedek Priesthood. (See D&C 107:74.) All members pay tithing to the bishop and should seek counsel from him.

The bishop must be a high priest (see D&C 68:19; D&C 84:29; D&C 107:17, 69-73) and is designated as the presiding high priest in the ward. In this capacity he may preside over the ward council and ward priesthood executive council meetings, where elders quorum and high priests group officers are in attendance.

While the bishop may recommend that a man be ordained an elder or high priest, and verify his worthiness, the approval and ordination are under the direction of the stake presidency. A bishop does not call, nor can he release the presidency of an elders quorum; they come under the direction of the stake presidency.

A bishop might convene a disciplinary council to consider the transgression of an elder in his ward. He may disfellowship the elder if that is merited, but he cannot deprive him of his priesthood by excommunication. That would require a disciplinary council presided over by the stake presidency, who govern the Melchizedek Priesthood.

Temple Recommends

The bishop has authority to judge the worthiness of a member to receive a temple recommend, and his counselors have the authority to assist in interviewing ward members for subsequent temple recommends. The stake president or his counselors also interview those going to the temple, because there members will participate in ordinances of the Melchizedek Priesthood.


More Than One Ordained Office

Sometimes a man may hold more than one ordained office at a time. For instance, both bishops and patriarchs are also high priests. Also, a man may hold an ordained office and be set apart to other offices. For instance, an ordained elder may be set [page 13] apart to offices such as president of his quorum, a ward mission leader, or Sunday School president.


Let Every Man Act in the Office to Which He Is Called

The Lord counseled us to "let every man learn his duty, and to act in the office in which he is appointed, in all diligence." (D&C 107:99.) An elder who has been called to an office of presidency should respect the callings of those over whom he presides. He should let, indeed help, them do that which they are called to do without usurping their responsibilities.

In turn, holders of the priesthood should avoid going around their file leader to a higher authority supposing that they will receive better counsel, more wisdom, spirituality, or authority. It is better to respect the callings of those over whom we preside and of those who preside over us.


The Name of the Lord

Rather than using "Mormon Church," we should call the Church by its name--The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, "for thus," the Lord told us in a revelation, "shall my church be called in the last days." (D&C 115:3-4.)

When we officiate in the priesthood, we always do it in the name of the Lord. (See 3 Ne. 27:1-10.) When we act according to the proper order of things, we act for the Lord and it is as though He were there insofar as the validity of the ordinance is concerned. The Lord said to one man who was being set apart to preach the gospel:

"I will lay my hand upon you by the hand of my servant Sidney Rigdon, and you shall receive my Spirit, the Holy Ghost, even the Comforter, which shall teach you the peaceable things of the kingdom." (D&C 36:2; emphasis added.)


Exceptions

Sometimes there must be exceptions to the rules and principles by which the priesthood is governed. Care must be taken to see that everything having to do with ordinations and settings apart are done in proper order. Generally, exceptions are approved by the First Presidency of the Church.


Recording Ordinations and Settings Apart

Proper records are always made of ordinations and settings apart in the Church. (See D&C 20:63-64; D&C 85:1-2; D&C 127:9.) For "behold, mine house is a house of order, saith the Lord God, and not a house of confusion." (D&C 132:8; see also D&C 88:119; D&C 109:8.)


Ordinances

The Melchizedek Priesthood "administereth the gospel and holdeth the key of the mysteries of the kingdom, even the key of the knowledge of God.

"Therefore, in the ordinances thereof, the power of godliness is manifest.

"And without the ordinances thereof, and the authority of the priesthood, the power of godliness is not manifest unto men in the flesh;

"For without this no man can see the face of God … and live." (D&C 84:19-22.)

The priesthood, which is always associated with God's work, "continueth in the church of God in all generations, and is without beginning of days or end of years." (D&C 84:17.)

"For whoso is faithful unto the obtaining these two priesthoods of which I have spoken, and the magnifying their callings, are sanctified by the Spirit unto the renewing of their bodies.

"They become the sons of Moses and of Aaron and the seed of Abraham, and the church and kingdom, and the elect of God.

"And also all they who receive this priesthood receive me, saith the Lord;

"For he that receiveth my servants receiveth me;

"And he that receiveth me receiveth my Father;

"And he that receiveth my Father receiveth my Father's kingdom; therefore all that my Father hath shall be given unto him." (D&C 84:33-38.)

 

 

The critical component of priesthood is keys, not understood as much as it should be in the Church!

 

Teachings Concerning
Priesthood Keys


What is the Purpose of Priesthood?

Wilford Woodruff

What is the priesthood for? It is to administer the ordinances of the gospel, even the gospel of our Father in heaven, the eternal God, the Eloheim of the Jews and the God of the Gentiles, and all he has ever done from the beginning has been performed by and through the power of that priesthood, which is "without father, without mother, without descent, having neither beginning of days, nor end of life," and the administration of his servants holding this priesthood is binding, being the savior of life unto life or death unto death. (The Discourses of Wilford Woodruff, p.67)
 

 

What Are Priesthood Keys?

Church Handbook of Instructions

The exercise of priesthood authority is governed by those who hold its keys (see D&C 65:2; 124:123). These keys are the right to preside over and direct the Church within a jurisdiction. (Book Two, p. 161 [Published by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Salt Lake City, Utah, 1998])


Joseph F. Smith

The Priesthood in general is the authority given to man to act for God. Every man ordained to any degree of the Priesthood, has this authority delegated to him. But it is necessary that every act performed under this authority shall be done at the proper time and place, in the proper way, and after the proper order. The power of directing these labors constitutes the keys of the Priesthood. (Gospel Doctrine, p.136)


Joseph Fielding Smith

These keys are the right of presidency; they are the power and authority to govern and direct all of the Lord's affairs on earth. Those who hold them have power to govern and control the manner in which all others may serve in the priesthood. All of us may hold the priesthood, but we can only use it as authorized and directed so to do by those who hold the keys. ("Eternal Keys and the Right to Preside," Ensign, July 1972, p. 87)


James E. Faust

To be efficacious and valid, every act in the Church must be performed under the authority of the keys at the appropriate time and place, and in the proper manner and order. The authority and power to direct all of the labors of the kingdom of God on earth constitute the keys of the priesthood. Those who possess them have the right to preside over and direct the affairs of the Church in their jurisdiction. ("The Keys That Never Rust," Ensign, Nov. 1994, p. 73)


Russell M. Nelson

Preparation, priesthood service, and keys are all related, but different. Service of any type requires preparation. But proper authorization to give that service requires keys. May I illustrate?

Prior to my call to the Twelve, I served as a medical doctor and surgeon. I had earned two doctor's degrees. I had been certified by two specialty boards. That long preparation had consumed many years, yet it carried no legal permission. Keys were required. They were held by authorities of the state government and the hospitals in which I desired to work. Once those holding proper authority exercised those keys by granting me a license and permission, then I could perform operations. In return, I was obligated to obey the law, to be loyal, and to understand and not abuse the power of a surgeon's knife. The important steps of preparation, permission, and obligation likewise pertain to other occupations. ( "Keys of the Priesthood," Ensign, Nov. 1987, p. 36)
 

 

Only President of Church Holds Priesthood Keys in Fulness


Church Handbook of Instructions

The Lord Jesus Christ holds all the keys of the priesthood. He has given His Apostles the keys that are necessary for governing His Church. Only the senior Apostle, the President or the Church, may use (or authorize another person to use) these keys for governing the entire Church (see D&C 43:1-4; 81:2; 132:7). (Book Two, p. 161 [Published by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Salt Lake City, Utah, 1998])


Joseph F. Smith

In their fulness, the keys are held by only one person at a time, the prophet and president of the Church. He may delegate any portion of this power to another, in which case that person holds the keys of that particular labor. Thus, the president of a temple, the president of a stake, the bishop of a ward, the president of a mission, the president of a quorum, each holds the keys of the labors performed in that particular body or locality. His Priesthood is not increased by this special appointment, for a seventy who presides over a mission has no more Priesthood than a seventy who labors under his direction; and the president of an elders' quorum, for example, has no more Priesthood than any member of that quorum. But he holds the power of directing the official labors performed in the mission or the quorum, or in other words, the keys of that division of that work. So it is throughout all the ramifications of the Priesthood -- a distinction must be carefully made between the general authority, and the directing of the labors performed by that authority. (Gospel Doctrine, p.136)


Joseph Fielding Smith

  • This priesthood and these keys were conferred upon Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery by Peter, James, and John, and by Moses and Elijah and others of the ancient prophets. They have been given to each man who has been set apart as a member of the Council of the Twelve. But since they are the right of presidency, they can only be exercised in full by the senior apostle of God on earth, who is the president of the Church. ("Eternal Keys and the Right to Preside," Ensign, July 1972, p. 87)
  • I wish we could get it firmly fixed in our minds that only one man upon the face of the earth at a time holds, in their fulness, the powers, the keys, the authorities, of this glorious priesthood. The man who holds these keys by virtue of his right, that right which God himself has vested in him, has the right to delegate authority and to withdraw authority as he sees fit and receives inspiration so to do.  No man, I do not care who he is or how much priesthood he holds, has any right to officiate in any ordinance of this gospel for any soul contrary to the sanction and the approval of the man who holds the keys of authority in this Church. Now the Lord has told us that. (Doctrines of Salvation, 3:135)


Bruce R. McConkie

The keys of the kingdom of God--the right and power of eternal presidency by which the earthly kingdom is governed--these keys, having first been revealed from heaven, are given by the spirit of revelation to each man who is both ordained an Apostle and set apart as a member of the Council of the Twelve.

But since keys are the right of presidency, they can only be exercised in their fulness by one man on earth at a time. He is always the senior Apostle, the presiding Apostle, the presiding high priest, the presiding elder. He alone can give direction to all others, direction from which none is exempt.

Thus, the keys, though vested in all of the Twelve, are used by any one of them to a limited degree only, unless and until one of them attains that seniority which makes him the Lord's anointed on earth. ("The Keys of the Kingdom," Ensign, May 1983, 22-23)
 

 

Who Receives Delegated Priesthood Keys?


Church Handbook of Instructions

The President of the Church authorizes presidents of temples, missions, stakes, and districts; bishops and branch presidents; and quorum presidents to hold the priesthood keys they need to preside. A person who serves in one of these positions holds the keys only until he is released. Counselors do not receive keys, but they do receive delegated authority by calling and assignment. No priesthood keys exist on earth except with the officers of the Church. (Book Two, p. 161 [Published by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Salt Lake City, Utah, 1998])
 

What Are the Keys of the Kingdom?


Joseph Fielding Smith

We also hold the keys of the kingdom of God on earth, which kingdom is The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. These keys are the right of presidency; they are the power and authority to govern and direct all of the Lord's affairs on earth. Those who hold them have power to govern and control the manner in which all others may serve in the priesthood. All of us may hold priesthood, but we can only use it as authorized and directed so to do by those who hold the keys. This priesthood and these keys were conferred upon Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery by Peter, James, and John, and by Moses and Elijah and others of the ancient prophets. They have been given to each man who has been set apart as a member of the Council of the Twelve. But since they are the right of presidency, they can only be exercised in full by the senior apostle of God on earth, who is the president of the Church. (Joseph Fielding Smith, Conference Report, April 1972, 98-99)
 

 

Joseph Smith Received All Priesthood Keys


Wilford Woodruff

Every key relating to this dispensation was given to the Prophet Joseph, and they remain with the priesthood today. (The Discourses of Wilford Woodruff, p.71)
 

 

Joseph Smith Gave Keys to the Twelve Apostles


Wilford Woodruff

All that President Young or myself, or any member of the quorum need have done in the matter was to have referred to the last instructions at the last meeting we had with the Prophet Joseph before starting on our mission [to the eastern states]. I have alluded to that meeting many times in my life.

The Prophet Joseph, I am now satisfied, had a thorough presentiment that that was the last meeting we would hold together here in the flesh. We had had our endowments; we had had all the blessings sealed upon our heads that were ever given to the apostles or prophets on the face of the earth. On that occasion the Prophet Joseph rose up and said to us: "Brethren, I have desired to live to see this temple built. I shall never live to see it, but you will. I have sealed upon your heads all the keys of the kingdom of God. I have sealed upon you every key, power, principle that the God of heaven has revealed to me. Now, no matter where I may go or what I may do, the kingdom rests upon you."

Now, don't you wonder why we, as apostles, could not have understood that the prophet of God was going to be taken away from us? But we did not understand it. The apostles in the days of Jesus Christ could not understand what the Savior meant when he told them " I am going away; if I do not go away the Comforter will not come." Neither did we understand what Joseph meant. "But," he said, after having done this, "ye apostles of the Lamb of God, my brethren, upon your shoulders this kingdom rests; now you have got to round up your shoulders and bear off the kingdom." And he also made this very strange remark, "If you do not do it you will be damned." (The Discourses of Wilford Woodruff, pp .71-72)
 
 

How Have the Keys Been Passed On to the Present?


See Bruce R. McConkie, "The Keys of the Kingdom," Ensign, May 1983, 21-23


James E. Faust

Prior to the martyrdom, no doubt with a sense of foreboding, the Prophet Joseph prepared for his death. President Joseph Fielding Smith states:

"The Prophet declared that he knew not why, but the Lord commanded him to endow the Twelve with these keys and priesthood, and after it was done, he rejoiced very much, saying in substance, 'Now, if they kill me, you have all the keys and all the ordinances and you can confer them upon others, and the powers of Satan will not be able to tear down the kingdom as fast as you will be able to build it up, and upon your shoulders will the responsibility of leading this people rest' " (Joseph Fielding Smith, Doctrines of Salvation, comp. Bruce R. McConkie, 3 vols. [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1954-56], 1:259).

After learning of the deaths of the Prophet Joseph and the Patriarch Hyrum, Wilford Woodruff reports his meeting with Brigham Young, who was then the President of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles, as follows: "I met Brigham Young in the streets of Boston, he having just returned, opposite to Sister Voce's house. We reached out our hands, but neither of us was able to speak a word. … After we had done weeping we began to converse. … In the course of the conversation, he [Brigham Young] smote his hand upon his thigh and said, 'Thank God, the keys of the kingdom are here' " ("The Keys of the Kingdom," Millennial Star, 2 Sept. 1889, p. 546).

When Brigham Young returned to Nauvoo, Sidney Rigdon, who had been a Counselor to Joseph Smith, challenged the leadership of Brigham Young and the Apostles. Said Brigham Young to the Saints in meeting assembled, "If the people want President Rigdon to lead them they may have him; but I say unto you that the Quorum of the Twelve have the keys of the kingdom of God in all the world." He continued: "I know where the keys of the kingdom are, and where they will eternally be. You cannot call a man to be a prophet; you cannot take Elder Rigdon and place him above the Twelve; if so, he must be ordained by them" (History of the Church, 7:233).

Brigham Young, as the President of the Quorum of the Twelve, subsequently became the President of the Church, following the Prophet Joseph Smith. So it was with President Howard W. Hunter following the death of President Ezra Taft Benson. As President Joseph Fielding Smith wrote:

"There is no mystery about the choosing of the successor to the President of the Church. The Lord [page 73] settled this a long time ago, and the senior apostle automatically becomes the presiding officer of the Church, and he is so sustained by the Council of the Twelve which becomes the presiding body of the Church when there is no First Presidency. The president is not elected, but he has to be sustained both by his brethren of the Council and by the members of the Church" (Doctrines of Salvation, 3:156).

On the fifth of June 1994, the Quorum of the Twelve, of which President Hunter was then President, collectively holding all of the keys of the kingdom, convened in the Salt Lake Temple. President Howard W. Hunter was then ordained and set apart by the Twelve, with President Gordon B. Hinckley as voice for the Twelve. President Hunter thus became the President and legal administrator of the Church, and the only man authorized to dispense, oversee, and exercise all of the keys of the kingdom of God on earth. He also became the successor to the keys held by Joseph Smith, Brigham Young, John Taylor, Wilford Woodruff, Lorenzo Snow, Joseph F. Smith, Heber J. Grant, George Albert Smith, David O. McKay, Joseph Fielding Smith, Harold B. Lee, Spencer W. Kimball, and Ezra Taft Benson. ["The Keys That Never Rust," Ensign, Nov. 1994, p. 73]
 

A List of Some of the Priesthood Keys Restored to Joseph Smith


[For an excellent article concerning this see, Bruce R. McConkie, "This Final Glorious Gospel Dispensation," Ensign, Apr. 1980, pp. 21-25.]


Moroni

"Behold, this is wisdom in me; wherefore, marvel not, for the hour cometh that I will drink of the fruit of the vine with you on the earth, and with Moroni, whom I have sent unto you to reveal the Book of Mormon, containing the fulness of my everlasting gospel, to whom I have committed the keys of the record of the stick of Ephraim" (D&C 27:5)
 

John the Baptist

"Upon you my fellow servants, in the name of Messiah I confer the Priesthood of Aaron, which holds the keys of the ministering of angels, and of the gospel of repentance, and of baptism by immersion for the remission of sins; and this shall never be taken again from the earth, until the sons of Levi do offer again an offering unto the Lord in righteousness." (D&C 13)
 

Peter, James, and John

"And also with Peter, and James, and John, whom I have sent unto you, by whom I have ordained you and confirmed you to be apostles, and especial witnesses of my name, and bear the keys of your ministry and of the same things which I revealed unto them; Unto whom I have committed the keys of my kingdom, and a dispensation of the gospel for the last times; and for the fulness of times, in the which I will gather together in one all things, both which are in heaven, and which are on earth" (D&C 27:12-13).

"Peter, James, and John, who were the First Presidency in their day, brought back the Melchizedek Priesthood including the holy apostleship; they restored the keys of the kingdom; and they conferred the keys of the dispensation of the fulness of times." (Bruce R. McConkie, Ensign, April 1980, p. 22)

"The keys or power to go forth and proclaim the gospel was restored to Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery when Peter, James, and John conferred upon them the Melchizedek Priesthood before the organization of the Church. It is true that John the Baptist had conferred upon them the keys of the Aaronic Priesthood before the Melchizedek Priesthood was restored. This was necessary because the time had come for them to be baptized and hold this priesthood preparatory to the coming of the higher priesthood. We read in the Doctrine and Covenants that the Aaronic Priesthood holds the keys of the preparatory gospel; that is to say, the teaching of faith, repentance, and baptism for the remission of sins. This authority was given on the fifteenth day of May, 1829, but there was no commandment given for Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery to go forth to teach and baptize until the Church was organized, although a few earnest souls who were acquainted with the restoration had sought baptism and had been baptized. It remained for Peter, James, and John to come with the keys of the Melchizedek Priesthood to complete the authority to proclaim the gospel to the world." (Joseph Fielding Smith, Jr., Answers to Gospel Questions, 1:132)
 

Moses

"After this vision closed, the heavens were again opened unto us; and Moses appeared before us, and committed unto us the keys of the gathering of Israel from the four parts of the earth, and the leading of the ten tribes from the land of the north." (D&C 110:11)

"Question: "What is the difference between the keys of the missionary work given the Prophet Joseph Smith by Peter, James, and John and the keys restored by Moses for the gathering of Israel?"

"Answer: The answer to this question is a simple one. When Moses was called to gather Israel and lead them back to the land that the Lord had given to Abraham for an everlasting possession, they were members of the Church. Moses was not sent to restore to them the priesthood, nor to convert them, for they were all versed in the knowledge that they were the descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and without doubt had ministers among them. They had been trained in the teachings of Jacob and Joseph. So the work of Moses was to gather Israel who were in a compact body. His mission was to lead them to the land of their fathers and see that they were established there according to the commandment of the Lord. It is verily true that through him the Lord gave many laws and commandments for their government and spiritual development as well as the "carnal law."

In these latter days when Israel has been scattered, Moses was sent to restore the keys of the gathering, not the preaching of the gospel. It was after people were converted that the spirit of gathering entered their souls, and it was due to the influence of the Spirit of the Lord, based upon the restoration of the keys given to Moses, that the members of the Church, when they were brought into the Church, obtained the desire to gather to the body of the Church. So these two things went hand in hand.

You will recall the fact that it was immediately after the organization of the Church that the spirit entered into the brethren to go forth and preach the gospel. The coming of Moses was not until April 1836, six years following the sending forth of missionaries to convert the world. So if it were dependent on the restoration of the keys held by Moses for the preaching of the gospel, then it would seem that Moses should have come April 6, 1830, at the beginning, but the work of proselyting commenced immediately following the organization of the Church. (Answers to Gospel Questions, 3:153-154)
 

"What was the object of gathering the Jews, or the people of God in any age of the world? . . . The main object was to build unto the Lord a house whereby He could reveal unto His people the ordinances of His house and the glories of His kingdom, and teach the people the way of salvation; for there are certain ordinances and principles that, when they are taught and practiced, must be done in a place or house built for that purpose." (Joseph Smith, Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p.307-308)
 

Elias

"After this, Elias appeared, and committed the dispensation of the gospel of Abraham, saying that in us and our seed all generations after us should be blessed." (D&C 110:12)

"And so, the Lord be praised, the marriage discipline of Abraham was restored; it is the system that enables a family unit to continue in eternity; it is the system out of which eternal life grows." (Bruce R. McConkie, Ensign, April 1980, p. 23)

Elijah

"After this vision had closed, another great and glorious vision burst upon us; for Elijah the prophet, who was taken to heaven without tasting death, stood before us, and said: Behold, the time has fully come, which was spoken of by the mouth of Malachi--testifying that he [Elijah] should be sent, before the great and dreadful day of the Lord come-- To turn the hearts of the fathers to the children, and the children to the fathers, lest the whole earth be smitten with a curse-- Therefore, the keys of this dispensation are committed into your hands; and by this ye may know that the great and dreadful day of the Lord is near, even at the doors." (D&C 110:13-16)

"Elijah restored the keys of the sealing power, by which the ordinances in the temple are bound in heaven as well as on earth, for both the living and the dead." (Joseph Fielding Smith Jr., Doctrines of Salvation, 2:234)

Elijah restored to this Church and, if they would receive it, to the world, the keys of the sealing power; and that sealing power puts the stamp of approval upon every ordinance that is done in this Church and more particularly those that are performed in the temples of the Lord. Through that restoration, each of you, my brethren, has the privilege of going into this house or one of the other temples (I believe most of you have done so) to have your wife sealed to you for time and for all eternity, and your children sealed to you also, or better, have them born under that covenant." (Joseph Fielding Smith Jr., Doctrines of Salvation, 3:129)

"The keys of Elijah's work and ministry are extremely interesting. His coming was the fulfilling of the promise made through Malachi. It is the planting in the hearts of the children the promises made to their fathers, that in these last days, the children should do the work which was denied the fathers upon which their salvation depends. Many members of the Church have thought that the keys restored by Elijah were keys pertaining to the dead, and therefore Elijah practiced in his day ordinances in behalf of the dead. This is an error. There was no work performed for the dead by Elijah or any other prophet before the crucifixion of Jesus Christ. The keys held by Elijah were the keys of the sealing power by which all ordinances are sanctioned and approved and upon which the eternal seal of authority is placed." (Joseph Fielding Smith, The Signs of the Times, p.188)

"Now for Elijah. The spirit, power, and calling of Elijah is, that ye have power to hold the key of the revelations, ordinances, oracles, powers and endowments of the fulness of the Melchizedek Priesthood and of the kingdom of God on the earth; and to receive, obtain, and perform all the ordinances belonging to the kingdom of God, even unto the turning of the hearts of the fathers unto the children, and the hearts of the children unto the fathers, even those who are in heaven. . . Then what you seal on earth, by the keys of Elijah, is sealed in heaven; and this is the power of Elijah, and this is the difference between the spirit and power of Elias and Elijah; for while the spirit of Elias is a forerunner, the power of Elijah is sufficient to make our calling and election sure; and the same doctrine, where we are exhorted to go on to perfection, not laying again the foundation of repentance from dead works, and of laying on of hands, resurrection of the dead, &c." (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, pp.337-338)

 

 

 

 

Restoration – Ohio

 

February 19. 2004

 

 

 

Restoration of Priesthood

 

Restoration of Ordinances

 

Restoration of Doctrine

 

 

The Lamanite mission by Oliver Cowdery and Parley P. Pratt among others was one of the most important events in Church history; it was an answer to a prayer by Enos long ago, verses 11-17 of his book.

 

(Enos 1:11-17.)

 

11 And after I, Enos, had heard these words, my faith began to be unshaken in the Lord; and I prayed unto him with many long strugglings for my brethren, the Lamanites.

 

12 And it came to pass that after I had prayed and labored with all diligence, the Lord said unto me: I will grant unto thee according to thy desires, because of thy faith.

 

13 And now behold, this was the desire which I desired of him—that if it should so be, that my people, the Nephites, should fall into transgression, and by any means be destroyed, and the Lamanites should not be destroyed, that the Lord God would preserve a record of my people, the Nephites; even if it so be by the power of his holy arm, that it might be brought forth at some future day unto the Lamanites, that, perhaps, they might be brought unto salvation—

 

14 For at the present our strugglings were vain in restoring them to the true faith. And they swore in their wrath that, if it were possible, they would destroy our records and us, and also all the traditions of our fathers.

 

15 Wherefore, I knowing that the Lord God was able to preserve our records, I cried unto him continually, for he had said unto me: Whatsoever thing ye shall ask in faith, believing that ye shall receive in the name of Christ, ye shall receive it.

 

16 And I had faith, and I did cry unto God that he would preserve the records; and he covenanted with me that he would bring them forth unto the Lamanites in his own due time.

 

17 And I, Enos, knew it would be according to the covenant which he had made; wherefore my soul did rest.

 

 

THE ZION OF THE WESTERN WORLD

 

BY early spring of 1831 the church in Kirtland and vicinity had increased to more than one thousand in membership. The New York saints also began to arrive in the spring, and by May all had reached Kirtland, or its vicinity.

 

GATHERING AT KIRTLAND

 

A conference of the church had been appointed for June. It convened on Friday the third and continued until Sunday; the congregation is said to have numbered two thousand. fn During the conference a revelation was received appointing by name twenty-eight elders to travel through the western country in pairs, preaching the gospel by the way, baptizing and confirming by the water's side those who would receive the truth. These elders were to meet in conference in western Missouri, "upon the land," said the Lord, "which I will consecrate unto my people, which are a remnant of Jacob, and those who are heirs according to the covenant." fn

 

Joseph Smith, Jun., and Sidney Rigdon were to be among those who were to go upon this mission, and if faithful the Lord promised to reveal to them the place of the saints' inheritance in Missouri. "I will hasten the city in its time," said the Lord, "and will crown the faithful with joy." fn And so the elders went forth upon this mission.

 

Meantime the Colesville saints, about sixty in number, led from Colesville, New York, by Newel Knight, and who had settled at Thompson, sixteen miles northeast of Kirtland, met with some disappointment growing out of the bad faith of one Lemon Copley, a "Shaking Quaker," fn residing at Thompson. He had under his control an extensive tract of land which he agreed to allow the Colesville saints to occupy, and a contract was agreed upon; but the terms of this agreement Copley soon afterwards broke, and threw all concerned into confusion. FN Copley had joined the church and had been ordained to the priesthood. There was a large settlement of the "Shakers" located near the city of Cleveland, and Elders Rigdon, Parley P. Pratt and Copley were sent on a mission to them, but they would not hear much less receive the gospel. FN Copley himself also turned away from the faith, which doubtless led to the breaking of his engagements with the Colesville saints at Thompson. Under these circumstances the Colesville branch resolved to remove in a body under the leadership of Newel Knight to the land of promise, western Missouri. They settled about twelve miles west of Independence, Jackson County, on the edge of an extensive prairie in Kaw Township, now part of Kansas City, arriving there the latter part of June.

 

Joseph Smith arrived in Missouri about the middle of July. Here he met with the Lamanite mission sent from New York less than a year before. The Prophet, however, had already heard the report of their labors through Elder Parley P. Pratt, who had been sent back to Ohio, early in the spring, to report the mission's progress.

 

THE LAMANITE MISSION IN WESTERN MISSOURI

 

It appears that after leaving Kirtland in November, 1830, the Lamanite mission visited the Wyandot tribe of Indians near Sandusky, Ohio, with whom they spent several days. "We were well received," writes Elder Parley P. Pratt, "and had an opportunity of laying before them the record of their forefathers, which we did. They rejoiced in the tidings, bid us Godspeed and desired us to write to them in relation to our success among the tribes further west, who had already removed to the Indian territory, where these expected soon to go." fn

 

On arriving at Independence two of the company secured employment, while the other three crossed the frontier line and began their labors among the Indians. They visited the Shawnees, spending one night with them, and the next day crossed the Kansas River and began their labors among the Delaware’s. They sought an interview with the chief of the Delaware’s, known among the whites as "Chief Anderson." He was the grand sachem of ten nations or tribes, and consequently possessed of large influence. He had always opposed the introduction of missionaries among his people, and therefore did not at first extend a very hearty welcome to the brethren. However, through an interpreter, the brethren made known their errand and explained to him the Book of Mormon and the information it contained for his people. They asked to be heard before a full council of his nation, a proposition which the chief took under consideration until the next day. Next morning the conversation with the Delaware chief was renewed, but he was not inclined at first to call the council. However as he began to understand better the nature of the Book of Mormon, he changed his mind and asked the brethren to suspend their conversation until the council could be assembled. A runner was dispatched to the tribes and in about an hour forty leading men were assembled and seated in grave silence to hear the message concerning the book of their forefathers.

 

MISSION AMONG THE LAMANITES

 

Oliver Cowdery addressed them at some length, during which he detailed the history of their forefathers to them, their ancient glory and power, and the cause of their decline and present fallen state. He announced the discovery of the record containing an account of these ancient events, and recited the prophecies the book contained of future deliverance of the red man from his thralldom of savage life with its attendant physical hardships and moral and spiritual limitations. In reply the venerable chief of the Delaware’s said:

 

"We feel truly thankful to our white friends who have come so far and been at such pains to tell us good news, and especially this new news concerning the book of our forefathers it makes us glad in here"—placing his hand on his heart. "It is now winter; we are new settlers in this place; the snow is deep; our cattle and horses are dying; our wigwams are poor; we have much to do in the spring; to build houses and fence and make farms; but we will build a council house and meet together, and you shall read to us and teach us more concerning the book of our fathers, and the will of the Great Spirit."

 

Elder Parley P. Pratt in his report of the mission says:

 

"We continued for several days to instruct the old chief and many of his tribe. The interest became more and more intense on their part, from day to day, until at length nearly the whole tribe began to feel a spirit of inquiry and excitement on the subject. We found several among them who could read, and to them we gave copies of the book, explaining to them that it was the book of their forefathers. Some began to rejoice exceedingly and took great pains to tell the news to others in their own language. The excitement now reached the frontier settlements in Missouri, and stirred up the jealousy and envy of the Indian agents and sectarian missionaries to that degree that we were soon ordered out of the Indian country as disturbers of the peace, and even threatened with the military in case of non-compliance. We accordingly departed from the Indian country and came over the line, and commenced laboring in Jackson County, Missouri, among the whites. * * * Thus ended our first Indian mission, in which we had preached the gospel in its fulness and distributed the record of their forefathers among three tribes, viz.: The Cattaraugus Indians, near Buffalo, N. Y.; the Wyandot, of Ohio; and the Delaware’s, west of Missouri." FN

 

 

(B. H. Roberts, A Comprehensive History of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 6 vols. [Salt Lake City: Deseret News Press, 1930], 1: 250.)

 

 

 

The western reserve of Ohio was like a mini New England.

 

The Book of Mormon is a way to separate the wheat from the tares.  It’s here to gather the House of Israel and testify of Jesus Christ, see the title page.

 

Bruce mentioned an article about the Knight family in the January 1989, Ensign, there is also a great book about the family in the BYU Studies website.

 

Doctrine and Covenants

The Knight Family:
Ever Faithful to the Prophet

By William G. Hartley

William G. Hartley, “The Knight Family: Ever Faithful to the Prophet,” Ensign, Jan. 1989, 43
Joseph Smith spied aged Joseph Knight hobbling down a Nauvoo street. He quickly overtook his longtime friend from New York and handed the elderly man his cane, insisting that Brother Knight keep it and pass it on to a descendant named Joseph. 1 Their friendship had lasted nearly twenty years, dating to before the time Joseph Smith had received the Book of Mormon plates.

After the Smiths, the Joseph and Polly Knight family may be the second family of the Restoration. The Knights knew Joseph Smith and accepted his claims before Oliver Cowdery, Martin Harris, or David Whitmer knew him. The Knights also stood by Joseph Smith more steadfastly than did the Three and the Eight Witnesses and even some of the Smiths. They became a special type of witness, a family witness of Joseph Smith’s prophetic work.

Joseph Smith’s friendship with the Knights began when he was twenty years old. In late 1826, Joseph Smith became a hired hand for Joseph Knight, Sr., and others in the Colesville, New York, area—115 miles southeast of Palmyra by dirt road. Young Joseph did farm work and probably helped at the Knights’ sawmill. He had experienced the First Vision six years before and had been meeting with Moroni for three years.

While helping the Knights, he bunked with Joseph Knight, Jr., who wrote that in November 1826 Joseph Smith “made known to us that he had seen a vision, that a personage had appeared to him, and told him where there was a gold book of ancient date buried, and that if he would follow the direction of the Angel, he could get it. We were told this in secret.” 2

Another son, Newel Knight, wrote that Joseph Smith visited them often and that they “were very deeply impressed with the truthfulness of his statements concerning the Plates of the Book of Mormon which had been shown him by an Angel of the Lord.” 3

Joseph Smith was then courting Emma Hale, a romance Father Knight assisted: “I paid him the money and I furnished him with a horse and cutter [sled] to go and see his girl.” 4 Joseph and Emma married shortly after that, on 18 January 1827, and moved to the Smith home near Palmyra.

When the time came for Joseph Smith to obtain the plates, Father Knight traveled to the Smith home, where the Prophet used his wagon to retrieve the plates. Late that night, after Joseph Smith had returned from his mission, he said to Brother Knight, “It is ten times better than I expected.” According to Father Knight, the Prophet described the plates, though he “seemed to think more of the glasses or Urim and Thummim than he did of the plates. ‘For’ says he, ‘I can see any thing. They are marvelous.’ ”

By early 1828, Joseph and Emma had moved to Emma’s father’s property, about thirty miles from the Knights. Joseph Smith found it impossible to both earn a living and translate the plates. The Smiths asked Father Knight for help. Although the Knights were “not in easy circumstances,” Joseph Knight, Sr., gave the young man some goods: “some few things out of the store, a pair of shoes, and three dollars.” A few days later, Father Knight visited the couple and gave them some money to buy paper for the translation. Joseph Knight, Jr., recalled that, prior to Oliver Cowdery’s arrival, “Father and I often went to see him and carry him something to live upon.”

Mrs. Knight was not yet a believer, so in March 1828 her husband took her by sled to visit the Smiths. He wrote, “Joseph talked with us about his translating and some revelations he had received. And from that time my wife began to believe.”

In early 1828, when Oliver Cowdery became Joseph Smith’s scribe, the two visited Father Knight, seeking provisions. Father Knight paid for and delivered a barrel of mackerel, about ten bushels of grain and six of potatoes, a pound of tea, and some lined paper for writing. The two rejoiced at the food and paper, and “then they went to work, and had provisions enough to last till the translation was done.”

Years later, Joseph Smith praised Father Knight for these items: they “enabled us to continue the work when otherwise we must have relinquished it for a season.” 5 Joseph Knight, Sr., helped the world receive the Book of Mormon sooner. If the Prophet had had to work full-time to support his family, the translation might have taken years to complete.

In May 1829, Joseph Knight, Sr., desired to know what he should do regarding the divine work then unfolding. The Prophet inquired of the Lord and received a revelation instructing Father Knight to “seek to bring forth and establish the cause of Zion” (D&C 12:6) and to give heed with all his might to God’s word. This was the first of many revelations in the Doctrine and Covenants directed to the Knights. 6

In early June 1829, Joseph and Oliver finished the work of translation on the Book of Mormon, and the Three Witnesses and then the Eight Witnesses were allowed to see the plates. Sadly, none were Knights, who lived quite a distance away. But on the day the Church was organized, one-third of the sixty people there were Knight Relatives from Colesville.

Shortly thereafter, Joseph Smith went to Colesville to preach and hold meetings, probably because he knew that the Knights were ready to receive the gospel. While there, he challenged Newel Knight to pray vocally. In the attempt, Newel was attacked by an evil spirit that lifted him from the floor “and tossed him about most fearfully.” Neighbors gathered and then saw the Prophet command the devil in the name of Jesus Christ to depart. Newel felt great relief and gladly accepted baptism. (This exorcism was the first miracle performed in the restored church.) 7 He became the first of more than sixty of the Knight clan to join the Church.

At the Church’s first conference on 9 June 1830 at the Whitmer’s, those attending experienced spiritual outpourings similar to those on the Day of Pentecost. Newel was one. He beheld a vision much like the one Stephen the Martyr saw: “I saw the heavens opened, I beheld the Lord Jesus Christ seated at the right hand of the Majesty on High, and it was made plain to my understanding that the time would come when I would be admitted into His presence, to enjoy His society for ever and ever.”

Despite local harassment, many Knight relatives were baptized on 28 June 1830. They included Father and Mother Knight, son Joseph, Newel’s wife Sally, daughter Esther and her husband William Stringham, and daughter Polly (named after her mother). Mother Knight was a Peck, and among the Peck relatives baptized were her brother Hezekiah and his wife Martha and her sister Esther and her husband Aaron Culver. 8

Angry neighbors prevented the converts from being confirmed, and a constable arrested Joseph Smith. Father Knight, indignant, hired James Davidson and John Reid, neighboring farmers well versed in the law, to defend his friend. They did, and Joseph Smith was acquitted the following midnight. 9

Joseph Knight, Jr., said that feelings in the neighborhood became heated: “That night our wagons were turned over and wood piled on them, and some sunk in the water, rails were piled against our doors, and chains sunk in the stream and a great deal of mischief done.”

Within hours after his acquittal, Joseph Smith was arrested again and tried in Colesville. Father Knight’s lawyer friends felt too fatigued to help, but his pleadings won them over. Mr. Reid said that Father Knight was “like the old patriarchs that followed the ark of God to the city of David.” Newel, called upon to testify, told the court that no, Joseph Smith had not cast a devil out of him, but that Joseph by God’s power had cast it out. Mr. Davidson and Mr. Reid picked apart the prosecution’s case and Joseph Smith was freed. 10

In September 1830, Newel Knight and his sister Anna’s husband, Freeborn DeMille, attended the Church’s second conference, held at Fayette, New York. 11 Newel was ordained a priest, and Freeborn was baptized.

At Fayette, Newel Knight became the young prophet’s confidant during a crisis caused by Hyrum Page’s claim of receiving revelations for the Church through a peepstone. Newel wrote that Hyrum Page carried “quite a roll of papers full of these revelations,” which led many astray. Joseph Smith “was perplexed and scarcely knew how to meet this new exigency.” Sharing the same room, the two friends spent the greater part of the night in prayer. In response, Joseph received a revelation (see D&C 28) that spelled out the proper channels for revelation to reach the Church. Newel reported, “Brother Page and all … present renounced the stone … much to our joy and satisfaction.”

After the meetings, Hyrum Smith was appointed to preside over the Colesville Branch. He and Jerusha lived with and became good friends with Newel and Sally Knight. Later, Newel replaced Hyrum as branch president.

In December 1830, the Church was commanded to “assemble together at the Ohio.” (D&C 37:3.) Newel Knight said that this entailed the sacrifice of their property. Newel sold 60 acres, Freeborn DeMille 61 acres, Aaron Culver 100 acres, and Father Knight 140 acres, with “two Dwelling Houses, a good barn, and a fine orchard.” Led by Newel, sixty-two Knight kin moved to Ohio as part of the first gathering. Unlike other Church units, the Colesville Branch remained intact.

The family settled on Leman Copley’s land near Painesville, Ohio, and became the first people in the Church in this dispensation to try to live an economic cooperative order. (See D&C 48; D&C 51.) But Leman Copley soon withdrew his land and ordered the Saints off. Father Knight wrote, “We sold out what we Could But Copley took the advantage of us and we Could not git any thing for what we had done.” Newel Knight asked the Prophet for counsel, and in response Joseph Smith received a revelation directing the Knight clan to move once again, this time to Missouri. (See D&C 54.)

On 25 July 1832, Joseph Smith welcomed his Colesville friends to Missouri and directed them to settle twelve miles west of Independence. “We found the country to be Butiful rich and plesent and we made our selves as Comfortable as we Could,” Father Knight wrote.

The Knights eagerly pitched in to establish the area as a center place for Zion and for a great temple. When twelve men laid the first log as a foundation of Zion, five were Knight relatives. Newel Knight was one of seven who dedicated the Jackson County temple site. For the Knight clan, such ceremonies stirred hope of a great future, despite the tragedies among them. Mother Knight had been so sick on the trip from Ohio that Newel brought along lumber for her coffin. Her “greatest desire,” he wrote, was “to set her feet upon the land of Zion and to have her body interred” there. She became the first Saint buried in Missouri. That year, death claimed two more Knights—one of them Newel’s sister Esther, the other his uncle, Aaron Culver.

This outpost colony of the Church saw a busy year of building, fencing, and establishing homes while consecrating its properties to live cooperatively. When the Church formed a council of high priests to govern the stake in Missouri, Newel Knight became one of the council. He continued to be president of what was still called the Colesville Branch. Six Knight men also made labor pledges as part of plans to build the Independence Temple.

Father Knight remarried, to Phoebe Crosby Peck, his first wife’s widowed sister-in-law. Phoebe had four children of her own, and the couple had two more. Counting Phoebe’s four, they were the parents and stepparents of thirteen children.

In the last half of 1833, Missourians drove the Saints, including the Knight clan, from Jackson County. Mobbers shot Philo Dibble, whom Newel Knight saved from death through a remarkable priesthood blessing. 12 Fearing for their lives, the Knights braved the cold weather and rushed to the Missouri River ferries. Joseph Knight, Jr., told of women and children walking with bare feet on frozen ground. The Knights lost all their property, including a gristmill. Of that awful winter, Sally Knight’s sister, Emily Colburn Slade, recalled, “We lived in tents until winter set in, and did our cooking out in the wind and storms.” 13

Suffering from poor food and shelter, many Saints became victims of fever and what was called ague (probably malaria). Sally was one of them. She gave birth to a son, who died, and then she died herself. “Truly she has fallen a martyr to the gospel,” her husband, Newel, eulogized.

In 1835, Newel traveled to Ohio to help build the temple and to receive temple blessings. At Kirtland, he boarded with his good friends Hyrum and Jerusha Smith. There he met and fell in love with Lydia Goldthwaite Bailey, whose belief in Joseph Smith was equal to his.

A few years previous, Lydia’s husband had deserted her, and both of her children had died, so her family sent her to Canada for a change of scenery. In late 1833, while staying with the Nickerson family, she heard Joseph Smith preach and saw his face “become white and a shining glow seemed to beam from every feature.” 14 This witness of the Spirit converted her. She then moved to Kirtland. On 24 November 1835, Joseph Smith performed Newel and Lydia’s wedding at Hyrum Smith’s home. The ceremony was the first marriage performed by the Prophet. 15

Newel took Lydia to Missouri—just in time to join the Mormon exodus from Clay County to Far West. When Joseph Smith also moved to Far West in 1838, Newel rejoiced to again hear the Prophet preach: “His words were meat and drink for us.”

Unfortunately, the strife that had beset the Church did not abate. The Knights in Far West were saddened to see several leading elders forsake the Church. The high council Newel Knight served on had to cut off the entire Missouri stake presidency, including David and John Witmer, two Book of Mormon witnesses. Oliver Cowdery also veered away. 16 Missourians were also clashing again with the Saints, and once more in winter 1838–39, Church members surrendered homes and lands and became refugees. The Knight clan struggled across Missouri to Illinois.

Within a few months, the Knight and Peck families had moved to where Nauvoo would rise. They now included at least eleven family units—four headed by members of Father Knight’s generation, seven by Newel’s generation. They had passed the tests of loyalty the troubles at Kirtland and Missouri had thrown at them. Since converting nine years before, they had moved to five settlements, including the present one. (Notably, between 1831 and 1846, the Knights helped to pioneer no less than ten LDS settlements in Ohio, Missouri, Illinois, Iowa, and Nebraska. 18) Unlike the Three Witnesses and other prominent leaders of the Church, their knees had not buckled. Despite suffering great losses of property, they did not turn against their religion. The family’s bill of damages for losses in Missouri alone reached $16,000, or more than $500,000 today. 17

In Illinois, Newel Knight eagerly greeted the Prophet shortly after he arrived from his long incarceration in Missouri prisons. Newel described that meeting thus: “As soon as I could I went to see him, but I can never describe my feelings on meeting with him, and shaking hands with one whom I had so long and so dearly loved, his worth and his sufferings filled my heart with mingled emotions, while I beheld him and reflected upon the past, and yet saw him standing before me, in the full dignity of his holy calling, I could but raise my heart in silent but ardent prayer that he and his family and his aged parents may never be torn apart in like manner again.”

Once more, the Knights went to work building up the Church and a new city—Nauvoo, the “City of Joseph.” Newel served on the high council. He and Joseph Knight, Jr., built several gristmills. About the time the Prophet gave Father Knight the cane, the city council voted to give him a lot and built him a house. Still in use today, Knight Street memorializes Joseph Smith’s esteem for the Knights.

One day in January 1842, the Prophet listed in the Book of the Law of the Lord the names of those “faithful few” who had stood by him since the beginning of his ministry—“pure and holy friends, who are faithful, just, and true, and whose hearts fail not.” He included Father Knight: “My aged and beloved brother, Joseph Knight, Sen., who was among the number of the first to administer to my necessities, while I was laboring in the commencement of the bringing forth of the work of the Lord. … For fifteen years he has been faithful and true, and even-handed and exemplary, and virtuous and kind, never deviating to the right hand or to the left. Behold he is a righteous man, may God Almighty lengthen out the old man’s days. … And it shall be said of him, by the sons of Zion, while there is one of them remaining, that this man was a faithful man in Israel; therefore his name shall never be forgotten.”

The Prophet also recalled Father Knight’s sons, “Newel Knight and Joseph Knight, Jun., whose names I record … with unspeakable delight, for they are my friends.” 19

In Nauvoo, the Knight group faced and passed another great test of faith. The Prophet introduced several doctrines relating to the temple including the temple ceremonies and plural marriage, which some could not accept. 20 But the Knights received the teachings. They helped to finish the temple and then performed baptisms for the dead. By early 1846, more than twenty adults in the Knight families had received their temple endowments and sealings. Four of Father and Polly Knight’s children entered into plural marriage.

When Joseph and Hyrum Smith died, few mourned their passing more than the Knights. Newel’s heart broke, and he vented his sorrow in his journal: “O how I loved those men, and rejoiced under their teachings! it seems as if all is gone, and as if my very heart strings will break, and were it not for my beloved wife and dear children I feel as if I have nothing to live for. … I pray God my Father that I may be reconciled to my lot, and live and die a faithful follower of the teachings of our Murdered Prophet and Patriarch.

Following the martyrdom, the Knights passed still another severe test of loyalty. Unlike a number of others, they did not forsake the faith and follow false successors. They chose to follow the Quorum of the Twelve. All the relatives in Nauvoo (except perhaps Nahum, for whom we lack records) left the city to go westward. When ready to depart, Newel Knight “once more had the satisfaction of walking through the streets of the City of Joseph, and beholding the great works, he had so nobly reared before his martyrdom.” Once across the Mississippi River, Newel looked back a last time at the city: “My heart swelled, for I beheld at a glance, from the eminences where I stood, the noble works of Joseph the Prophet and Seer, and Hyrum his patriarch, with whom I had been acquainted, even from their boyhood, I knew their worth, and mourned their loss.”

While moving west with the exiled Saints, Newel died of exposure in northern Nebraska in January 1847. Father Knight died at Mount Pisgah, Iowa, a month later. The family, from the Church’s second year to its fourteenth, sacrificed some of its best blood for the gospel’s sake. Of Father Knight’s thirteen children and their spouses, six individuals died, one couple remains unaccounted for, and the remaining seventeen reached Utah.

The Knights are not silent witnesses of Joseph Smith and the restored gospel. Lydia wrote her life story. Newel kept an invaluable journal. Father Knight and Joseph, Jr., both penned their recollections. All four authors revered Joseph Smith.

The Knight families knew Joseph Smith in the earliest days, when he was accused of gold-digging and using peep stones. If Joseph Smith were a charlatan or disreputable money grubber as detractors charged, the large Knight clan would not have felt such deep trust in him. Their loyalty to him was based on firsthand, intimate knowledge, which stands today as a solid witness that the Prophet’s character, from when he was twenty to his death at thirty-eight, was righteous and good.

Critics of Joseph Smith have questioned his motives, truthfulness, and divine claims. Defenders have argued that God used him to restore the true church to the earth. The debate and discussion should not ignore the faithful and solid Knight family, who remained loyal to the prophet longer than any other family. The Knights bear a powerful, persistent testimony that Joseph Smith was what he claimed to be.

The cane that Joseph Smith gave to Father Knight in Nauvoo continues to pass down the generations of Knights from one Joseph to another. It is just one memorial of the friendship and mutual faith Joseph Smith and the Joseph Knight family shared.

Family Chart

Children of Joseph Knight, Sr., and first wife, Polly Peck:

     Nahum Knight (md. Thankfull)

     Esther Knight (md. William Stringham)

     Newel Knight (md. Sally Colburn and Lydia Goldthwaite)

     Anna Knight (md. Freeborn Demille)

     Joseph Knight, Jr. (md. Betsey Covert, Adeline Johnson, Abba Welden, and Mary Woolerton)

     Polly Knight (md. William Stringham)

     Elizabeth Knight (md. Joseph W. Johnson)

Children of Joseph Knight, Sr., and second wife, Phoebe Crosby Peck:

     Hezekiah Peck (md. Jemima Smoot)

     Samantha Peck (md. Hosea Stout)

     Henrietta Peck (md. Thomas R. Rich)

     Sarah Jane Peck (md. Charles C. Rich)

     Ether Knight (md. Jane Terry)

     Charles C. Knight (died as a child)

Gospel topics: Church history, Joseph Smith

Notes

  1. This article is adapted from the author’s “They Are My Friends”: A History of the Joseph Knight Family, 1825–1850 (Provo, Utah: Grandin Book Company, 1986). The cane story is on page three.

  2. In this article, all quotations from Joseph Knight, Jr., are from his “Incidents of History,” LDS Church Archives. The original spelling and punctuation from this and other sources cited have been retained.

  3. In this article, all quotations from Newel Knight are from his unpublished journal, LDS Church Archives.

  4. In this article, all quotations from Joseph Knight, Sr., are from his history as published in Dean C. Jessee, ed., “Joseph Knight’s Recollections of Early Mormon History,” Brigham Young University Studies 17 (Autumn 1976):26–39.

  5. History of the Church, 1:47.

  6. See D&C 12, D&C 23, D&C 37, D&C 52, D&C 54, D&C 56, D&C 58, D&C 124.

  7. History of the Church, 1:82–83.

  8. Ibid., 1:87–88.

  9. Ibid., 1:88–91, 95.

10. Ibid., 1:91–96.

11. Another account of the conference is in History of the Church, 1:109–20.

12. See Clare B. Christensen, Before and After Mt. Pisgah (Salt Lake City: privately published, 1979), p. 79.

13. Emily M. Austin, Mormonism; or, Life among the Mormons (Madison, Wis: M. J. Cantwell, 1882), p. 72.

14. “Homespun” (pseudonym for Lydia Knight and Susan Young Gates), Lydia Knight’s History (Salt Lake City: Juvenile Instructor Office, 1883), p. 18.

15. See Lydia Knight’s History, pp. 29–31; History of the Church, 2:320.

16. For high council proceedings, see 1837 and 1838 entries in Donald Q. Cannon and Lyndon W. Cook, eds., Far West Record: Minutes of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 1830–1844 (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1983).

17. “Missouri Petitions for Redress,” LDS Church Archives.

18. The settlements are the settlement near Painesville, Ohio; Kaw Township, Clay County, and Far West, Missouri; Nauvoo, Illinois; Mt. Pisgah, Garden Grove, and Council Bluffs, Iowa; and Winter Quarters and Ponca, Nebraska Territory.

19. History of the Church, 5:107, 124–25.

20. For doctrines introduced at Nauvoo, see T. Edgar Lyon, “Historical Highlights of the Saints in Illinois,” The First Annual Church Educational System Religious Educators Symposium, 19–20 August 1977, transcript of addresses and abstracts of presentations, pp. 69–71.

 

They were ambitious FOR the kingdom, not ambitious IN the kingdom.

 

 

 

D&C 50:14, 21-22 – Troubles of discerning the Spirit were evident in the Ohio branches.  Joseph went to the Lord in prayer and received Section 50.  An emotional experience IS NOT a spiritual experience.

 

 

 

Reasoning Together—Discerning the Spirit

 

When Joseph arrived in Kirtland on the last day of January, 1831, he was immediately aware that the Ohio branches were in trouble. The leadership vacuum created when Cowdery and his companions departed was quickly filled by the Prophet, whose pleas to the Lord received answers that had a profound impact.

 

Within days of his arrival, directives were received "embracing the Law of the Church" (D&C 42). FN Among the several subjects dealt with was the question posed by "the Family." Those of that group who were baptized wished to continue the common stock experiment while others wondered if the whole Church should accept their communitarian life-style. In his response, the Lord made clear that "the Family" was a confusing deception and was to be replaced by his own program, the Law of Consecration and Stewardship (D&C 42:29-36). In section 51 of the Doctrine and Covenants specifics of the program were revealed which, if followed, were designed to prepare a world community wherein justice, equality, peace, and mutual love and respect would predominate. FN

 

A more pressing challenge for the Prophet was the seemingly unrestrained spiritual exercises manifest in all the Ohio branches and the manner in which they were viewed by an already hostile press and public. Most of the revelations received during Joseph's first five months in Ohio were in part a result of or dealt in some way with this problem. As reported by John Whitmer, the situation was one where

 

Some had visions and knew not what they saw, some would fancy to themselves that they had the sword of Laban, and would wield it as expert as a light dragon, some would act like an Indian in the act of scalping, some would slide or scoop on the floor, with the rapidity of a serpent, which they termed sailing in the boat to the Lamanites, preaching the gospel. And many other vain and foolish manoevers that are unseeming and unprofitable to mention. . . . These things grieved the servants of the Lord, and some conversed together on this subject, and others came in and we were at Joseph Smith, Jr. the Seer, and made it a matter of consultation, for many would not turn from their folly, unless God would give a revelation. FN

 

Parley P. Pratt, who returned to Kirtland in the early summer of 1831, wrote that "some very strange spiritual operations were manifested, which were disgusting, rather than edifying. Some persons would seem to swoon away, and make unseemly gestures, and be drawn or disfigured in their countenances. Others would fall into ecstasies, and be drawn into contortions, cramps, fits, etc. Others would seem to have visions and revelations, which were not edifying, and which were not congenial to the doctrine and spirit of the gospel. In short, a false and lying spirit seemed to be creeping into the Church." FN

 

Obvious though it was to Whitmer and Pratt that the excesses they observed were not of God, there were others who were not easily convinced. Jared Carter, himself a New York convert, related how following his arrival in Kirtland he

began to be tried with certain transactions that took place in the Church, and especially certain exercises which they called visions. The first instance of this kind, that I witnessed, was at the house of a Mr. Barna, in Amherst. On seeing these manifestations, I was doubtful concerning them, and did not know what to do. I felt that I could not depend upon my own views as well as upon those of some of the others, who were present who were more experienced than myself. But I proposed that we engage in prayer. In this, however, I could not obtain a union with the spirit that prevailed in the meeting. At last I concluded to kneel down and pray openly, and it seemed to me that I could pray in faith that any false spirit present should depart from the meeting. After I arose from my prayer, I found that quite a change in the meeting had taken place for when I began my prayer, two of the members laid prostrate in what some of them called a vision, but after I had prayed a few minutes, they suddenly came out of them and were clothed in their right mind. On seeing this, I felt pretty well convinced in my own mind that these exercises were not good; but after meeting, I conversed with some of the Elders, whom, I found to be fully of the belief that these visions were from a good source, in fact so united were the members of the church in their belief that these manifestations were from God, that I almost concluded that I had been mistaken. . . . I was led to conclude that these exercises were of the spirit of the Lord, though at other times I was very much concerned about them.

 

On a certain occasion I attended a meeting together with Sylvester Smith, at Amherst, where, just as we were about to administer the sacrament, a young woman was taken with an exercise that brought her to the floor. I doubted the propriety of such an experience in a public meeting and suggested to Bro. Sylvester that we should try that Spirit according to the revelation that God had given. Complying with my suggestion, we kneeled down and asked our Heavenly Father in the name of Christ, that if that spirit which the sister possessed was of him, he would give it to us. We prayed in faith, but we did not receive the Spirit. After Bro. Sylvester had made some communication which was not proclaiming against the spirit, I arose and proclaimed against it with a loud voice, but this was very trying to the brethren present, as nearly all of them believed that the manifestations were of God and now after this I had some sore conflicts with Satan, for he told me I had lost all my influence in the Church, and sure enough that seemed to be the case for a while, but after contemplating for a time, I received assurance that I had the approbation of my Heavenly Father, which was better than the good will of many deceived brethren. FN

 

Section 42 had, in effect, set the Church in order. In section 45 the faith of the Saints was reinforced in the face of the debilitating criticism and sarcasm expressed by some non-Latter-day Saint neighbors. The matter of spiritual excesses and Satanic influences which had such a mesmeric effect on some members was approached directly in D&C 46, given 8 March 1831. Admonished to petition God in all things and respond to the resultant influence of the Spirit with holiness of heart, upright conduct, prayer, and thanksgiving, the Saints were informed that in this way they could overcome the seductions of evil spirits and the deceptions of men who were agents of the adversary. To further avoid such calamities they were counseled to seek the best gifts and to know why they were doing so.

 

The revelation further detailed the sacred nature of gifts of the Spirit and the manner in which they are dispensed. Emphasis was placed on the importance of understanding, of properly discerning, and of profiting from that which was given. To further guard against the abuse of sacred experiences and in order to detect Satanic counterfeits, the bishop and other ecclesiastical leaders were named as having the power of discernment (D&C 46:7-9, 27).

 

Throughout the spring of 1831, the strange behavior of some members continued. Though all were awed and some were repulsed by such actions, there was a hesitancy to resist them openly. Finally, as Parley P. Pratt, who felt compelled to act, noted: "Feeling our weakness and inexperience, and lest we should err in judgment concerning these spiritual phenomena, myself, John Murdock, and several other Elders, went to Joseph Smith, and asked him to inquire of the Lord concerning these spirits or manifestations." fn The response to the Prophet's query was section 50 of the Doctrine and Covenants. As was so often the case when Joseph took a matter to the Lord, the answer became a means of teaching that went far beyond the question asked.

 

After making plain the Satanic nature of that which was plaguing the Church and acknowledging that the actions of some had given the adversary power among them, the Lord in patient and fatherly fashion bid Joseph and his fellow petitioners to "come, . . . let us reason together, that ye may understand; let us reason even as a man reasoneth one with another face to face" (D&C 50:10-11). The verses that follow suggested to the brethren a simple procedure for knowing if a thing be of God or of some other source. The basis for judging was their own growing certitude as they had been taught the gospel and had gained testimonies and, as teachers, had born witness of its truthfulness. On those occasions they were first given and then themselves gave of the Spirit of Truth. Whereas, that which is of God gives light and continues to enlighten until one knows with perfect assuredness, they were told, that which is of the evil one is a devourer of light and neither edifies nor magnifies the mind of the individual (D&C 50:13-25).

 

Thus, sound reasoning based on personal spiritual awareness was their key to discernment. If, however, they faced a unique situation wherein the true nature of an event was so camouflaged as to be undetectable, they should ask in the name of Christ that such be revealed to them; if they still perceived not its truthfulness it could be taken with certainty that such was of the adversary. With these directions they were to go forward with confidence and a voice of authority in proclaiming "against that spirit . . . that is not of God" (D&C 50:31-32).

 

Joseph Smith's concern for the power and influence Lucifer might exercise among the Saints continued throughout his lifetime. A warning to this effect that appears in section 52 was repeated on numerous other occasions. FN An extensive treatment of the subject by the Prophet appeared in the 1 April 1842 edition of the Church publication Times and Seasons, entitled "Try the Spirits." The following paragraphs of that address summarize both the subject and its Kirtland episode as he viewed them.

 

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has also had its false spirits; and as it is made up of all those different sects professing every variety of opinion, and having been under the influence of so many kinds of spirits, it is not to be wondered at if there should be found among us false spirits.

 

Soon after the Gospel was established in Kirtland, and during the absence of the authorities of the Church, many false spirits were introduced, many strange visions were seen, and wild, enthusiastic notions were entertained; men ran out of doors under the influence of this spirit, and some of them got upon the stumps of trees and shouted, and all kinds of extravagances were entered into by them; one man pursued a ball that he said he saw flying in the air, until he came to a precipice, when he jumped into the top of a tree, which saved his life; and many ridiculous things were entered into, calculated to bring disgrace upon the Church of God, to cause the Spirit of God to be withdrawn, and to uproot and destroy those glorious principles which had been developed for the salvation of the human family. But when the authorities returned, the spirit was made manifest, those members that were exercised with it were tried for their fellowship, and those that would not repent and forsake it were cut off.

 

At a subsequent period a Shaker spirit was on the point of being introduced, and at another time the Methodist and Presbyterian falling down power, but the spirit was rebuked and put down, and those who would not submit to rule and good order were disfellowshipped. We have also had brethren and sisters who have had the gift of tongues falsely; they would speak in a muttering unnatural voice, and their bodies be distorted like the Irvingites before alluded to; whereas there is nothing unnatural in the Spirit of God." FN

 

 

(Robert L. Millet and Kent P. Jackson, eds., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 1: The Doctrine and Covenants [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1989], 209.)

 

 

 

Emotional experiences do not change people, spiritual experiences change people.

 

Boyd K. Packer, "Candle of the Lord" (to new mission presidents) 6/25/82.
We do not have the words (even the scriptures do not have words) which perfectly describe the spirit. The scriptures generally use the word voice, which does not exactly fit. These delicate, refined spiritual communications are not seen with our eyes, nor heard with our ears. And even though it is described as a voice, it is a voice that one feels, more than one hears.

Once I came to understand this, one verse in the Book of Mormon took on a profound meaning, and my testimony of the book increased immeasurably. It had to do with Laman and Lemuel, who rebelled against Nephi. Nephi rebuked them and said, "Ye have seen an angel, and he spake unto you; yea, ye have heard his voice from time to time; and he hath spoken unto you in a still small voice, but ye were past feeling, that ye could not feel his words." (1 Ne 17:45; italics added [by BKP].) ...

Should an angel appear and converse with you, neither you nor he would be confined to corporeal sight or sound in order to communicate. For there is that spiritual process, described by the Prophet Joseph, by which pure intelligence can flow into our minds and we can know what we need to know without either the drudgery of study or the passage of time, for it is revelation....

The Spirit does not get our attention by shouting or shaking us with a heavy hand. Rather it whispers. It caresses so gently that if we are preoccupied we may not feel it at all. (No wonder that the Word of Wisdom was revealed to us, for how could the drunkard or the addict feel such a voice?) ...

I have learned that strong, impressive spiritual experiences do not come to us very frequently. And when they do, they are generally for our own edification, instruction, or correction. Unless we are called by proper authority to do so, they do not position us to counsel or correct others.

I have come to believe also that it is not wise to continually talk of unusual spiritual experiences....

There is something else to learn. A testimony is not thrust upon you; a testimony grows. We become taller in testimony like we grow taller in physical stature; we hardly know it happens because it comes by growth.

It is not wise to wrestle with the revelations with such insistence as to demand immediate answers or blessings to your liking. You cannot force spiritual things. Such words as compel, coerce, constrain, pressure, demand, do not describe our privileges with the Spirit....

Do no be impatient to gain great spiritual knowledge. Let it grow, help it grow, but do not force it or you will open the way to be misled.
We are expected to use the light and knowledge we already possess to work out our lives. We should not need a revelation to instruct us to be up and about our duty, for we have been told to do that already in the scriptures; nor should we expect revelation to replace the spiritual or temporal intelligence which we have already received--only to extend it. We must go about our life in an ordinary, workaday way, following the routines and rules and regulations that govern life....

Be ever on guard lest you be deceived by inspiration from an unworthy source. You can be given false spiritual messages. There are counterfeit spirits just as there are counterfeit angels. (See Moro 7:17.) Be careful lest you be deceived, for the devil may come disguised as an angel of light.

The spiritual part of us and the emotional part of us are so closely linked that it is possible to mistake an emotional impulse for something spiritual. We occasionally find people who receive what they assume to be spiritual promptings from God, when those promptings are either centered in the emotions or are from the adversary.

Boyd K. Packer, General Conference, Ensign, Nov 1991, pp.21 ff.
... While we may invite this [divine] communication, it can never be forced! If we try to force it, we may be deceived....
For the past several years we have watched patterns of reverence and irreverence in the Church. While many are to be highly commended, we are drifting. We have reason to be deeply concerned. The world grows increasingly noisy. Clothing and grooming and conduct are looser and sloppier and more disheveled. Raucous music, with obscene lyrics blasted through amplifiers while lights flash psychedelic colors, characterizes the drug culture. Variations of these things are gaining wide acceptance and influence over our youth. Doctors even say that our physical sense of hearing can be permanently damaged by all of this noise.

This trend to more noise, more excitement, more contention, less restraint, less dignity, less formality is not coincidental nor innocent nor harmless....

Our sacrament and other meetings need renewed attention to assure that they are truly worship services in which members may be spiritually nourished and have their testimonies replenished and in which investigators may feel the inspiration essential to spiritual conversion. Our meeting houses are designed so that we may enjoy socials, dancing, drama, even sports. All of these are important. But these auxiliary activities should be subdued when compared with what the world is doing. Music, dress, and conduct associated with them are quite different from what is appropriate in the chapel or classroom on the Sabbath day.

When we return for Sunday meetings, the music, dress, and conduct should be appropriate for worship. Foyers are built into our chapels to allow for the greeting and chatter that are typical of people who love one another. However, when we step into the chapel we must-- each of us must--watch ourselves lest we be guilty of intruding when someone is struggling to feel delicate spiritual communications.
Leaders sometimes wonder why so many active members get themselves into such predicaments in life. Could it be that they do not feel what they need to feel because our meetings are less than they might be spiritually? Irreverent conduct in our chapels is worthy of a reminder, if not reproof. Leaders should teach that reverence invites revelation....

There is something else: We are drifting from the use of reverential words in our prayers. Familiar terms such as you and yours are replacing thee and thine in prayer. Teach the children and gently inform new members that we use reverential terms when addressing our Heavenly Father in prayer.

Boyd K. Packer, Tasting Salt - Describing the Spirit Conference Report, October 1964, p.126-129
Some time ago a representative of the Church on a plane bound for a large west coast city was drawn into conversation with a young attorney. Their conversation centered on the front page of a newspaper, a large city tabloid with the sordid, the ugly, the tragic openly displayed.

The attorney said the newspaper was typical of humanity and typical of life - miserable, meaningless, and in all ways useless and futile. The elder protested, holding that life was purposeful, and that there lives a God who loves his children, and that life is good indeed.

When the attorney learned that he was speaking to a minister of the gospel, he said with some emphasis, "All right! We have one hour and twenty-eight minutes left on this flight, and I want you to tell me what business you or anyone else has traipsing about the earth saying that there is a God or that life has any substantial meaning."

Boyd K. Packer, Ensign, Aug 1975, pp. 85 ff.
I think I should alert you to the fact that the talk I have prepared is not really very interesting. That, I must claim, is not because I have not spent time in preparing it, for I have -- a good deal more than usual. I want very much to be informative, and if you find that the talk is not interesting -- and you may -- be patient with the thought that in this case I would rather teach a few of you than entertain all of you....

I have become very anxious over the amount of counseling that we seem to need in the Church, and the network of counseling services that we keep building up -- without once emphasizing the principle of self-reliance as it is understood in the welfare program. There are too many in the Church who seem to be totally dependent, emotionally and spiritually, upon others. They subsist on some kind of emotional welfare. They are unwilling to sustain themselves. They become so dependent that they endlessly need to be shored up, lifted up, endlessly need encouragement, and they contribute little of their own....

Has it occurred to you that many problems can be solved by reading the scriptures? We should all personally be familiar with the revelations. As part of your emotional self-reliance, read the scriptures. I fear that leaders, both in the stakes and in the University, may be doling out counsel and advice without first requiring you to call on every personal resource and every family resource before seeking a solution of your problems from the Church....

I think that an emotional dole system can be as dangerous as a material dole system, and we can become so dependent that we stand around waiting for the Church to do everything for us. A few years ago I received a telephone call from a bishop whose son had been inducted into the military service and was at an army basic training center. The father said, "He's been there for three weeks and he hasn't been to church yet." Then he described his son as being an active Latter-day Saint, faithful in his duties. He had received his Duty to God award and was typical of the fine young men in the Church. "He's never missed a church meeting before," his father said. "Isn't there something you can do to help?" The boy had telephoned and said that no one had come yet to invite him to go to church.

I made an investigation of the circumstances. Can you picture the following: In the barracks a few feet from his bunk was a bulletin board. On it was an 8-1/2 x 11 bulletin with a picture of the Salt Lake Temple on it, and a listing of the meeting times at the base chapel. He had been to an orientation for all new inductees, conducted by one of the base chaplains. While in this case it was not a Latter-day Saint chaplain, there was a Latter-day Saint chaplain at that installation. This fact had been noted in the lecture, incidentally. He had been told that if he wanted to know about church services to talk to the sergeant on duty, or he could contact any chaplain's office and that information would readily be given him.
He, however, had been told before he left home that the Church had a wonderful program to help young men in the military service. He was assured that the Church was doing everything to take care of our men and that we would find them and look after them and bring the full Church program to them. He had, therefore, laid back on his bunk, propped up his feet, put his head on the pillow, and waited for the Church to do everything for him. He waited three weeks and was disappointed enough that he called his father, the bishop, to say that the Church had failed him.

Now this was not malicious. It was just that he had been brought up with the idea that the whole effort and duty of the Church was to look after him. (He had missed the very point that the whole effort of the Church is to give him the opportunity to serve someone else.) Surely, since he was away from home and in a strange place and needing attention more than he had every needed it in his life, all of that help, he was sure, would be forthcoming immediately without any effort on his part. He had been weakened by a dole system and was now in mortal spiritual jeopardy because he would not act for himself. That experience had a great effect on me, and when we reorganized the military relations program, it was entirely changed in its emphasis from what it had been before over the years. This change can be illustrated by one thing: The old program urged the ward or the quorum to subscribe to the Church magazine for every man entering the military service. It was the duty of the bishop to see that the subscription was renewed during the time of his enlistment. Now we have changed all of that. Now we counsel the young man to subscribe to the magazine himself and to pay for it out of his own money. He ordinarily has money to spend on less useful things, and he should learn to take care of himself at the very beginning. If he cannot, for one reason or another, then his family should supply it. If they cannot, or if in some cases they will not, then and only then would it be the responsibility of the ward or the quorum to step in and see that this important Church publication is sent to him.

We found that our men would not bother to file change-of-address cards for the magazines if the subscriptions had been doled out to them. They had done nothing to earn them, and they didn't appreciate them. On one occasion we had a communication from the commanding general at Fort Ord asking us to please cease and desist from sending subscriptions of Church magazines to men in basic training. They were there for only a few weeks and then they moved on. He advise, "We literally have a roomful of what now must be termed "junk mail." Under military regulations we cannot forward it and therefore must destroy it." It is interesting to see what has happened in that military relations program. It used to be that every week there would be many letters, "My boy is somewhere. Please, won't you get all of the Church working to find him?" We have put the shoe on the other foot. He's finding himself now. He is more self-reliant.

In virtually every ward or branch there are chronic cases of individuals who endlessly seek counsel but never follow the counsel that is given. That, some may assume, is not serious. I think it is very serious! Like the common cold, it drains more strength out of humanity than any other disease. We seem to be developing an epidemic of "counselitis" which drains spiritual strength from the Church. Spiritual self-reliance is the sustaining power in the Church. If we rob you of that, how can you get the revelation that there is a prophet of God? How can you get answer to prayer? How can you know? If we move so quickly to answer all your questions and provide so many ways to solve all of your problems, we may end up weakening you, not strengthening you.

Now I say here that I know quite well that some counselors are apt to say, "My counseling does not rob one of his self-reliance because I use the nondirective counseling approach. I am scrupulously careful not to take a position. I merely reflect back comments and feelings of the individual so that he will make the decision totally himself. I do my counseling by nondirection and never make a value judgment."

While I have respect for that procedure of counseling as a method, I think that if that's all they do, nondirection, very often that's precisely what we get from the counseling -- no direction. When counselors schedule interminable sessions to say as little as possible while the student is struggling to try to decide if something's right or wrong, and the counselor already knows, that's a waste of time. So is the fussing around trying to determine whether it is right for you under the circumstances or wrong for you under the circumstances, when anyone with any moral sense would know that if a course is wrong, it's wrong for anybody and it's wrong for everybody.

In the Church, the directive pattern of counseling is at least as respectable and decent and desirable and needed as the nondirective approach to counseling. Unfortunately, we see very little of it anymore. How sweet and refreshing for a branch president or a bishop or a counselor to say clearly to a student, "This course is right and this course is wrong. Now, you go and make the decision." The student ought to know what is right and what is wrong by the quickest method possible, and that may be very directive. There is a crying need for counselors who will say pointedly and plainly, "This is wrong. It's evil. It's bad. It will bring you unhappiness. This course is right. It is good. It is desirable. It will bring you happiness." Then the agency comes when the individual determines for himself whether or not he will follow the right course.

In the world, this preoccupation with counseling has led to a number of experiments from which we are not entirely free in the Church. There are those counselors who want to delve deeper into the lives of subjects than is emotionally or spiritually healthy. I think I should explain here that when I use the word counselor I'm not just talking about professional counselors. I'm talking about all of us who are responsible for counseling. There are those who want to draw out and analyze and take apart and dissect. While a certain amount of catharsis is healthy and essential, overmuch of it can be degenerating. It is seldom as easy to put something back together as it is to take it apart.

There have been developed several procedures for group therapy. They are promoted under a number of titles: sensitivity training, self-actualization, training groups or T-groups, simulation, transactional analysis, encounter groups, marathon counseling sessions. Some even function under such titles as value clarification, one or two under the title of character education, and so on. Although they differ in some respects (none of them is exactly alike), one or more of the following elements is apparent in all of them: They recognize no ultimate source for truth. All values are those established by the individuals or by the group. There is no reference to God. They encourage a free and full expression, something of a confession, before the group of every intimate and personal feeling and experience. They encourage an openness, a touching, and a closeness among the members of the group, and they attempt to resolve problems simply by finding a comfortable ["spiritual"?] interaction. Above all, they avoid any feeling of guilt.

There are major emotional and spiritual dangers involved in such procedures, and members of the Church would do well to be very cautious -- perhaps best to leave them alone. [Some scriptural references: 2 Ne 28:31; 2 Ne 9:28-29; 2 Ne 2:4-5; D&C 1:19.] ...

I think I should mention one other thing, and I hope this won't be misunderstood. We often find young people who will pray with great exertion over matters that they are free to decide for themselves. Suppose, if you will, that a couple had money available to build a house. Suppose they had prayed endlessly over whether they should build an Early American style, a ranch style, modern style architecture, or perhaps a Mediterranean style. Has it ever occurred to you that perhaps the Lord just plain doesn't care? Let them build what they want to build. It's their choice....

Now, if you start receiving revelation for anyone else's jurisdiction, you know immediately that you're out of order, that they come from the wrong source. You will not receive revelation to counsel your bishop or to correct the leaders of the Church....

Roy W. Doxey, Ensign, 2/73, p. 57
[Brigham Young said] he knew he had the Spirit of God with him because he thought about the gospel continually.

Dallin H. Oaks, BYU 1981-82 Fireside & Devotional Speeches, pp. 20 ff.
President Lorenzo Snow declared that it is "the grand privilege of every Latter-day Saint ... to have the manifestations of the spirit every day of our lives" (CR, 4/1899, p. 52) [Study the scriptures daily.] ...

"There are counterfeit signals" (Boyd K. Packer, "Prayers and Answers," Ensign, 11/79, p. 20). Satan is a great deceiver, and he is the source of some of these spurious revelations. Others are simply imagined....

I have heard of cases where a young man told a young woman she should marry him because he had received a revelation that she was to be his eternal companion. If this is a true revelation, it will be confirmed directly to the woman if she seeks to know. In the meantime, she is under no obligation to heed it. She should seek her own guidance and make up her own mind. The man can receive revelations to guide his own actions, but he cannot properly receive revelation to direct hers. She is outside his stewardship.

What about those times when we seek revelation and do not receive it? We do not always receive inspiration or revelation when we request it. Sometimes we are delayed in the receipt of revelation, and sometimes we are left to our own judgment. We cannot force spiritual things.

Joseph Fielding McConkie, Seeking the Spirit, p. 45
Nothing is imitated more often or counterfeited more frequently than spirituality.

Joseph Fielding McConkie, Seeking the Spirit, p. 7.
Considerable effort is necessary to become fluent in the language of the Spirit. Some who are unwilling to expend the effort to learn that language justify their spiritual lethargy by denying the reality of such things. To all such, gospel treasures or wisdom remain hidden.

Joseph Fielding McConkie, Seeking the Spirit, p. 10.
We choose to associate with those among us with whom we feel most comfortable; the Spirit of the Lord does likewise.

Joseph Fielding McConkie, Seeking the Spirit, pp. 46-49.
The efforts of such people to assess true spirituality usually fall short of the mark as do their efforts to imitate it. To some, spirituality is a sanctimonious list of do's and don'ts; to others it is a religious rally and a bumper sticker. Many are satisfied with a new set of terms to say that what they were doing before is all right. To still others, it is regularity in attending certain religious services or in obeying some other kind of commandment. Some measure spirituality by the zeal with which they vocalize certain tenets and the unrelenting attacks they make on the beliefs of others. For others it takes the form of masochism or personal denial, while there are those who use it as means to hide from the realities of life. Setting all such aside, let us see if by carefully searching the scriptures we can paint a word picture that at least leaves the proper impression in our minds as to what true spirituality is and how it is obtained.

Isaiah declared that "the work of righteousness shall be peace; and the effect of righteousness quietness and assurance forever." (Isa 32:17.) Just as it was intended that good works be accomplished quietly, so it is that the attendant spiritual rewards be unobtrusive. God is not a showman, and ostentatious displays quickly alienate his Spirit. Loud and indecorous behaviors provide a sharp contrast with the quiet assurance Isaiah suggested would be characteristic of those whose lives have truly been touched by the Spirit.

One of the most expressive passages dealing with the process of gaining spiritual understanding is found in Doctrine and Covenants 98:12. It reads: "For he will give unto the faithful line upon line, precept upon precept." Then the Lord adds, "and I will try you and prove you herewith." This passage limits the knowledge of spiritual things to the faithful, notes that a process is involved -- undoubtedly spanning a significant period of time -- and suggests that this slow schooling process of the Lord's will in itself prove to be the test of faith. Faith, like any other spiritual talent, grows gradually and is strengthened as it is used. We will consider the manner in which revelation is granted at greater depth in a subsequent chapter; yet, appropriately it could be noted at this point that the Lord has announced his system for manifesting his will as one in which understanding is granted "line upon line, precept upon precept, here a little and there a little." (2 Ne 28:30.) Those who are obedient and responsive to this process are rewarded with greater spiritual endowments, while those who announce themselves satisfied with their present state -- not desiring to move forward -- lose the understanding and light that they once possessed. In both instances, the process is quiet and gradual.

In this same context the Lord has said that those who live gospel principles will "learn wisdom," and then he added, "for unto him that receiveth I will give more; and from them that shall say, We have enough, from them shall be taken away even that which they have." (2 Ne 28:30.) Two basic concepts are involved here: First, that they key to knowledge is knowledge. That is, obtaining knowledge increases our capacity to obtain still more knowledge. In large measure, we learn by relating things to each other -- by identifying how things are similar; thus, the obtaining of knowledge becomes an ever-widening circle.

Conversely, and this is the second concept, when we arrive at the point at which we say "we have enough," we start to lose knowledge. For instance, President Harold B. Lee said of George Washington that he was an educated man because he never went to school -- thus he never quit learning. In the realm of spiritual things any religion that says the heavens are sealed and the Lord no longer speaks begins, like a schoolboy who has closed his books for summer vacation, to forget or lose even that which it had. Even in the realm of spiritual things the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.

Faith comes by righteousness. The Holy Ghost will associate with none but the clean. To the extent to which we are able to sanctify ourselves, we are welcomed into the association of those powers and influences reserved for the pure in heart. "No man is possessor of all things except he be purified and cleansed from all sin. And if ye are purified and cleansed from all sin, ye shall ask whatsoever you will in the name of Jesus and it shall be done." (D&C 50:28-29.) The Lord has said that his eyes are upon us and that he is in our midst though we see him not, "but the day soon cometh that ye shall see me, and know that I am; for the veil of darkness shall soon be rent, and he that is not purified shall not abide the day." (D&C 38:8.)

Nothing in our spiritual growth exceeds in importance the need for good spiritual hygiene. "Let virtue garnish thy thoughts exceedingly," wrote the Prophet; "then shall thy confidence wax strong in the presence of God," and the Holy Ghost become our "constant companion." (D&C 121:45-46.)

If our faith differs from the world, our works will differ also. Since the works are produced by faith, if our works are good, our faith is good. The claim to having the same faith as the ancients is evidenced only by producing the same results. If they dreamed dreams, we can dream dreams; if they saw visions, we can see visions; if they entertained angles, we can entertain angels; if they had living prophets and revelation, we too can having living prophets and revelation. If their faith made of them a peculiar people, in like manner we can become a peculiar people.
Works are the roots of faith. A system of beliefs that is not rooted in works of righteousness, like a tree whose branches have outgrown its roots, is vulnerable to uprooting by every wind of doctrine or ideological storm that comes its way. This is why the scriptures teach us that we can know the gospel only to the extent that we live it. Salvation consists in our becoming like God: we do that by learning to think as he thinks, believe as he believes, and do as he would do. (Bruce R. McConkie, Conference Report, Apr 1972, p. 134.)

Having already considered the manner in which Christ advanced from grace to grace, let us now consider the implications of this doctrine as far as men are concerned. Three times within a single sentence we are told that Christ did not receive "a fulness at first," but rather acquired that fulness advancing "from grace to grace." (D&C 93:12-14.) The revelation then proceeds to explain that we have had the process by which Christ obtained perfection taught us in order that we might gain an understanding of how and what to worship, that in due time we too might obtain a fulness of the Father. Salvation, then, consists in our advancing after the manner in which Christ advanced. His salvation did not consist of some divine manifestation of power, nor did it center in some particular event. He worked out his salvation with "fear and trembling" over the course of time by making his works the works of the Father, just as we have been commanded to do.

Christ showed the way; the path that we must walk. Our lot, like his, is to learn the will of the Father and do it, advancing from one grace to another, from good works to greater works, from challenges to greater challenges, from service to greater service, from hope to faith, from faith to power, in all things becoming like unto him. True worship takes the form of works. Thus, in Peter's language we become "partakers of the divine nature" (2 Pet 1:4), or in Joseph Smith's words, we are "assimilated into {his} likeness." (Lectures on Faith, p. 66.) Testimony, spiritual strength, salvation itself, become the product of the things we do -- not as the world would falsely tell us of some spiritual experience that assures that we will be saved.

God, in his wisdom, grants only that which we are prepared to receive. No purpose would be served by legions of angels coming from the courts on high to preach and teach in our meetings if they spoke a celestial language or taught principles beyond our comprehension. If an angel is going to communicate effectively with a man, he must condescend to speak in the language and according to the understanding of that man. Any other form of communication would be fruitless. Revelation, if it is to be meaningful, cannot exceed that which we are prepared to receive. If our preparation and understanding are puny, then the revelations we receive will be puny. We would not expect God to add to that which we did not improve upon. "Whom shall he teach knowledge, and whom shall he make to understand doctrine?" the scriptures inquire. Answering, we are told, "them that are weaned from the milk, and drawn from the breasts. For precept must be upon precept, precept upon precept; line upon line, line upon line; here a little and there a little." (Isa 28:9-10.)

Spiritual growth cannot be programmed. It is not for man to schedule or establish deadlines for the Spirit. The Lord has made it abundantly clear that spiritual blessings are granted according to "his own time, and in his own way, and according to his own will." (D&C 88:68.) The Lord has assured us that if we ask we shall receive, but that the promised blessings will be granted according to his timetable, not ours; confirmation, assurance, understanding, all will come line upon line, precept upon precept, here a little and there a little, as he wills it....

We cannot program spiritual growth any more than we can program physical growth. Imagine how silly it would be for a father to call all of his children in and establish goals for each of them as to how much they should grow in the next six months or year, and then to reward or punish them according to their success in meeting the goals he had established. No one questions that proper nourishment, exercise, and rest will facilitate proper growth, but we cannot demand it -- we cannot schedule it. As Christ "waited upon the Lord for the time of his ministry to come," so we too must learn patience, doing all e can to facilitate the receipt of such blessings, but not supposing it to be our right to dictate them.

Spiritual growth takes effort. The development of spiritual senses takes time. As we struggle in that process, what we learn today will be so much to our advantage tomorrow. The more we know, the greater our capacity to learn. Gospel principles are not mastered in a few days, weeks, or even months. For us to suppose otherwise is to be like the naive child who assumes his education is complete after a similarly short stint in school. The veil between man and the heavens is not drawn in a day; rather, it is pulled back gradually.

The refining of any of our senses takes time and effort. In that relationship we note with interest that people will commonly compensate for the loss of physical senses by developing others to a more marked degree. The ability to utilize these other senses was always theirs but remained dormant simply because no need required them. Similarly, within the soul of man rests a great host of spiritual senses -- these latent spiritual abilities anxiously await a time when we choose to develop them.

Joseph Fielding McConkie, Seeking the Spirit, p. 78.
Still the question persists as to why we were unable to get an answer and save ourselves such anguish and difficulties. To this we can only respond that life is a schoolmaster with some hard lessons to teach, and it is not in the providence of the Lord that people of faith be excused from life's difficult courses. It is almost axiomatic that life's greatest lessons come out of its greatest struggles. In the twilight years of his life, Elder Hugh B. Brown observed that he had "learned more from brick bats than bouquets." Faith, wisdom, judgment, all have their roots in such experiences. As the child must learn to stand on his own and then to walk without assistance, so we too must learn to stand alone and walk alone as we meet some of life's difficult challenges.

The Lord told Joseph Smith, "A man may receive the Holy Ghost, and it may descend upon him and not tarry with him." (D&C 130:23.) The implication of this passage is not that unworthiness has forced the Holy Ghost to flee, but rather that there are those occasions in which the Lord leaves us to our own devices and understanding. Elder Bruce R. McConkie has explained that "even a righteous person is often left to himself so that he does not at all times enjoy the promptings of revelation and light from the Holy Ghost." (Mormon Doctrine, p. 313.) ...

Joseph Fielding McConkie, Teach and Reach, pp. 5, 6.
Students who have been dined on a seven-course meal of fried fluff may have enjoyed the sweetness of its taste [the emotion, the "spirit"], but they soon find that such a meal does not produce sufficient spiritual energy to sustain them when strength is needed....
We live in a world in which synthetics are commonplace: logic and reason, argument and debate, science and archaeology, charisma and humor have all at one time or another been used as substitutes for the Spirit in teaching the gospel.

Joseph Fielding McConkie, The Spirit of Revelation, pp. 124 ff.
Revelation and spiritual experience, like true religion, always have their counterfeits. This is as true within the Church as it is in the world. In greater or lesser degree all of us, as we grow to spiritual maturity, have been tempted with these spiritual shams. Perhaps it would be helpful for us to briefly identify some of their more common forms.

The Spiritual-Bargain Hunters. These are the people who are constantly on the alert for a spiritual sale. They desire salvation without effort or inconvenience. They are often found shopping for counsel, running from Church leader to Church leader seeking answers that justify the course they have already determined to follow. They have mastered the art of selective hearing and selective believing. They continue to shop until they find what they want. These seekers of a bargain-basement theology are offended at the price tag affixed to genuine spiritual experiences and real gospel understanding.

The Saved Mormons. Having had some special spiritual experience or some special relationship with the heavens, these people become resentful when someone disturbs their pleasant spiritual slumber. They have some kinship to those of whom Nephi spoke when he said, "A Bible! A Bible! We have got a Bible, and there cannot be any more Bible." Their motto seems to be "Knowledge! Understanding! We have knowledge and understanding, and there cannot be any more knowledge or understanding." Their attitude is often very condescending toward the rest of the congregation who have not yet had the same spiritual experiences they claim.

The Spiritual Con Artists. In one of its most insidious forms, the con game in played by someone using Church membership or priesthood position as collateral for a business deal. This sham also includes the many young men and young women who have had dreams or visions in which they have been given specific directions as to whom they are to marry. A frustration to these manipulators of romance is that so many of them receive instructions that they are to marry the same person. One of the identifying characteristics of the spiritual con artists is the seeming ease with which they get answers to their prayers and the freedom with which they communicate with the heavens.

The Crusaders. Always articulate, these self-ordained spokesmen have a mission to straighten the church out on something or other. Often they can trace their authority to some private conversation with one of the Brethren (usually one who is now dead). Not infrequently their pitch will need as part of its introduction an affirmation of their testimony, loyalty to the Church, and positions that they have held. Of such, beware! There is a world of difference between the person who says, "I believe the Church is true and sustain the Prophet, but ..." and the person who says, "I believe the Church is true and sustain the Prophet, therefore ..."

The Goose-Pimple Gang. These are those who ride on an emotional wave. If it brings a tear to your eye or raises the hair on your arms, it must be revelation. They love the sensational and the dramatic but quickly lose interest in the scriptures and the basic principles of the gospel. They cherish "hand-me-down" stories that they hold to tenaciously even when confronted by eyewitnesses who tell them their stories are embellished and inaccurate.

The Destroying Angels. These are those who use gospel principles or leadership positions as a club to beat everyone else into line. These angels of destruction are often found impugning the loyalty and commitment of any whose experience, point of view, or spiritual maturity differs from their own. What they see is all there is to be seen. Like the spiritual mole, instead of building on the rock of revelation, they have burrowed beneath it. These souls have made their Sunday clothes from 100 percent pure woolen zeal. They have yet to find out how much more comfortable it is to wear a garment blended with patience, long-suffering, and love unfeigned.

Spirituality is something to be worked at, not something to be played with. Satan can and does use such expressions as "I feel impressed to say," "It was made known to me," "After much prayer," and "It is the will of the Lord that ..." Satan, who can speak all languages, also speaks very fluent Mormonese.

Truth can stand on its own. It does not need an office or a position to lean on. It need not be dressed up to appear respectable. It is not enhanced by shows of force, nor is it made more recognizable by emotional displays. Everything that comes from God carries with it its own evidence of its divine origin and needs no artificial coloring to make it more palatable.

Hugh Nibley, "Historicity of the Bible," Old Testament & Related Studies, pg 7-8.
... in the ways of disbelief the clergy have led the field. This can be seen in Marneck's final definition of a "religion without faith," for in the end he recommends "to the non-believing person access to religious feelings through the substitution (Auslösung) of religious feelings by like feelings of a non-religious nature." These "non-religious" feelings which are accessible to the complete "non-believer" are found in

o social good works,
o aesthetic experience,
o brotherly love,
o the psychological search for the deeper self, and
o the Ethical Gospel.

But these are the very things that for many years have made up the substance of religion as taught in liberal [Catholic and Protestant] theological seminaries everywhere: truly a "religion without faith." "Never before," says a leading Egyptologist, view our times against a sweeping background of world history, "was the human race farther from the divine than it is today. It has in this respect sunk to the lowest abyss."

Hugh Nibley, "A House of Glory."
[Re: D&C 109:35.] To carry us over we receive "anointing ... sealed ... with power from on high." Without that power we have nothing, as we clearly see when we try to put on our own show, such as church films of various kinds, including much sentimental kitsch with professional, non-LDS actors waxing emotional about situations which they have never experienced. Illustrations in study manuals, tear-jerking stories, photographs of sacred ordinances suffused with frosted light to make them spiritual -- do we need all this rhetorical and theatrical Hollywood and Disneyland if we have the real thing? The most impressive temple sessions I have attended have been at Manti where elderly farm people put on a far more intelligent display than the slick professionals. Do we take the real thing seriously enough?

Hugh Nibley, "Zeal without Knowledge." Approaching Zion, pg. 63ff.
... How many a Latter-day Saint has told me that he can understand the scriptures by pure revelation and does not need to toil at Greek or Hebrew [or English?] as the Prophet and the Brethren did in the School of the Prophets at Kirtland and Nauvoo? Even Oliver Cowdery fell into that trap and was rebuked for it. (D&C 9.)

The principle of knowledge is the principle of salvation. This principle can be comprehended by the faithful and the diligent ["and everyone that does not obtain knowledge sufficient to be saved will be condemned. The principle of knowledge is given us through the knowledge of Jesus Christ."]," says the Prophet Joseph. (Teachings, p. 297.) New converts often get the idea that having accepted the gospel, they have arrived at adequate knowledge. Others say that to have a testimony is to have everything -- they have sought and found the Kingdom of Heaven; but their minds go right on working just the same, and if they don't keep on getting new and testable knowledge, they will assuredly embrace those "wild, enthusiastic [emotional] notions" of the new converts in Kirtland. Note what a different procedure Joseph Smith prescribes: "The first comforter, or Holy Ghost, has no other effect than pure intelligence." It is not a hot, emotional surge. "It is more powerful in expanding the mind, enlightening the understanding, and storing intellect with present knowledge, of a literal seed of Abraham than one who is a gentile." (Teachings, p. 149.) "For as the Holy Ghost falls upon one of the literal seed of Abraham, it is calm and serene [emotional?] and his whole soul and body are only exercised by the pure spirit of intelligence. The spirit of revelation is in connection with these blessings. A person may profit by noticing the first intimation of the spirit of revelation: for instance, when you feel pure intelligence flowing into you, it may give you sudden strokes of ideas ... thus by learning the spirit of God and understanding it, you may grow in the principle of revelation." (Teachings, p. 151.) This is remarkable like the new therapeutic discipline called "biofeedback." ...

Yet Joseph Smith commends their intellectual efforts as a corrective to the Latter-day Saints, who lean too far in the other direction, giving their young people and old awards for zeal alone, zeal without knowledge -- for sitting in endless meetings, for dedicated conformity, and unlimited capacity for suffering boredom. We think it more commendable to get up at 5 a.m. to write a bad book than to get up at 9 o'clock to write a good one -- that is pure zeal that tends to breed a race of insufferable, self-righteous prigs and barren minds. One has only to consider the present outpouring of "inspirational" books [and tapes and videos] in the Church which bring little new in the way of knowledge: truisms, and platitudes, kitsch, and cliches have become our everyday diet. The Prophet would never settle for that. "I advise you to go on to perfection and search deeper and deeper into the mysteries of Godliness.... It has always been my province to dig up hidden mysteries -- new things -- for my hearers." (Teachings, p. 364.) It actually happens at the BYU, and that not rarely, that students come to a teacher, usually at the beginning of a term, with the sincere request that he refrain from teaching them anything new. They have no desire, they explain, to hear what they do not know already! I cannot imagine that happening at any other school, but maybe it does. Unless we go on to other new things, we are stifling our powers....

Are we here to seek knowledge or to seek the credits that will get us ahead in the world? One of the glorious benefits and promises of the gospel given the Saints in these latter days is that "inasmuch as they sought wisdom, they might receive wisdom ... and inasmuch as they were humble they might be made strong, and blessed from on high and receive knowledge from time to time." (D&C 1:26-28.) But they had to want it and seek for it. What is the state of things? The late President Joseph Fielding Smith wrote in the Melchizedek Priesthood Manual, Answers to Gospel Questions, 1972-73, p. 229, "We are informed that many important things are withheld from us because of the hardness of our hearts and the unwillingness as members of the Church to abide in the covenants and seek divine knowledge." Our faculties are enlarged," says Joseph Smith, "in proportion to the heed and diligence given to the light communicated from heaven to the intellect." (Teachings, p. 51.) If a man "does not get knowledge, he will be brought into captivity by some evil power in the other world, as those spirits will have more knowledge and consequently more power than many men who are on the earth. Hence it needs revelation to assist us, and give us knowledge of the things of God. (Teachings, p. 217.)

Noel B. Reynolds, Academic Vice-President, BYU, Summer 1981.
... too much of the literature used, seen, and quoted in the Church today is just sentimental trash which is designed to pull our heart strings or to moisten our eyes -- but it is not born of true spiritual experience. The tendency of our youth to use sentimental stories in Church talks creates a culture of spiritual misunderstanding in which thinking and learning are discouraged.

Because our youth often respond positively to sentimentalism, there is a danger that we might cater to that in the Church instruction more generally.... It [emotional sentimentalism] should never be leaned upon as a substitute for spirituality. Reliance on sentimentality will stunt our own spiritual growth by misleading us and filling our understanding with false experiences.

Two publishing houses which cater to an LDS audience are primarily interested in books either authored by well-known Mormons or so simply written that they give people a warm comfortable feeling without any challenging ideas. Such material fosters flabby reasoning which can easily make us vulnerable to false gospels, moralistic movements, and the irresponsible claims of some scholars and scientists.

 

 

SPIRITUAL EXPERIENCE

 

 

    1. Have been taught by the Holy Ghost.  Being enlightened, educated, edified, and taught by God.  There were no tears shed at the 1st vision, nor were there any tears shed while D&C 76 was given.

 

Gospel Preached in Power by the Spirit

 

There was of old, there is now, and to all eternity there shall be only one approved and proper way to preach the gospel—Preach by the power of the Spirit. Anything short of this is not of God and has neither converting nor saving power. All the religious learning, of all the professors of religion, of all the ages is as nothing compared to the Spirit-born testimony of one legal administrator.

 

Either ministers of religion receive revelation or they do not, and if they do not their words do not carry the final converting seal. Granted they may say things that are true, but truth alone is not enough. Pure religion is a thing of the Spirit and not of the intellect alone, and its truths must be carried into the hearts of hearers by the power of the Spirit, otherwise the human soul is not changed, the old man of sin is not crucified, and the seeker after salvation does not become alive in Christ.

 

If there is any truth of salvation that Deity has made imperishably clear, it is that first and last, in all ages, now and forever, among the learned and the ignorant for all races and peoples, and for that matter on all the endless worlds of the great Creator, there is one formula and one formula only for conveying saving truth to men—Preach by the power of the Spirit.

 

In a revelation to Joseph Smith, God commanded his ministers: "If ye receive not the Spirit ye shall not teach." Then he gave them this promise: "As ye shall lift up your voices by the Comforter, ye shall speak and prophesy as seemeth me good; For, behold, the Comforter knoweth all things, and beareth record of the Father and of the Son." (D. & C. 42:14-17.)

 

Reasoning with his ministers on this subject, the Lord said: "I the Lord ask you this question—unto what were ye ordained?" The answer, in Deity's language: "To preach my gospel by the Spirit, even the Comforter which was sent forth to teach the truth."

 

Then the Lord asked: "He that is ordained of me and sent forth to preach the word of truth by the Comforter, in the Spirit of truth, doth he preach it by the Spirit of truth or some other way?" And as though his voice thundered from Sinai, the Almighty answered: "If it be by some other way it is not of God."

 

This revealed reasoning then continues: "And again, he that receiveth the word of truth doth he receive it by the Spirit of truth or some other way? If it be some other way it is not of God. Therefore, why is it that ye cannot understand and know that he that receiveth the word by the Spirit of truth receiveth it as it is preached by the Spirit of truth? Wherefore, he that preacheth and he that receiveth, understand one another, and both are edified and rejoice together." ( D. & C. 50:13-22.)

 

From Nephi's inspired writings we learn that one of the signs of the great apostasy is that ministers of religion "shall teach with their learning, and deny the Holy Ghost, which giveth utterance." (2 Ne. 28:4.)

 

Is it any wonder, then, that Paul, who himself taught and wrote and preached by the power of the Spirit, should divide preachers into two classes: 1. Those who preach with enticing words of man's wisdom; and 2. Those who do so in demonstration of the Spirit and of power.

 

In this connection, however, it should be pointed out that there is much reasoning and intellectuality in the world which prepares men for that preaching which carries conviction and brings conversion. The Light of Christ is shed forth upon every person born into the world, teaching all men to do good, to love truth, and to come unto the gospel covenant. Those who heed the promptings and follow the pleadings of this Spirit accept and conform to many true principles and are thus ready to accept the fulness of revealed truth when it is taught to them by the power of the Holy Ghost. (D. & C. 88:45-53.)

 

Wisdom is of two kinds: 1. The wisdom of men or the wisdom of the world; and 2. The wisdom of God. One is of the intellect alone; the other is in the mind of God and is given to man by revelation. One is "foolishness" and "profiteth" nothing; the other leads to "that happiness which is prepared for the saints." (2 Ne. 9:28, 43.)

 

 

(Bruce R. McConkie, Doctrinal New Testament Commentary, 3 vols. [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1965-1973], 2: 318.)

 

 

 

 

 

    1. Trials – Abraham and Isaac, the Atonement at Gethsemane and Golgotha.  When I submit my will to His, I am taken to a place I do not want to go to, but must for my own salvation.

 

 

Priesthood Restoration

 

God the Father – (Prayer)

(Omnipotent)

 

Jesus Christ                                                                                         Holy Ghost

 

Creation                                                                                                Spiritual Rebirth

Atonement                                                                                            Remission of Sins

Church                                                                                                  Revelation

Priesthood Keys (Father)                                                                        Sanctification

 

God the Father delegated these to the Son and the Holy Ghost.  Man (Apostles) receives keys that govern this world, not all of the keys are here, (Resurrection).

 

Joseph Fielding Smith

These keys are the right of presidency; they are the power and authority to govern and direct all of the Lord's affairs on earth. Those who hold them have power to govern and control the manner in which all others may serve in the priesthood. All of us may hold the priesthood, but we can only use it as authorized and directed so to do by those who hold the keys. ("Eternal Keys and the Right to Preside," Ensign, July 1972, p. 87)

James E. Faust

To be efficacious and valid, every act in the Church must be performed under the authority of the keys at the appropriate time and place, and in the proper manner and order. The authority and power to direct all of the labors of the kingdom of God on earth constitute the keys of the priesthood. Those who possess them have the right to preside over and direct the affairs of the Church in their jurisdiction. ("The Keys That Never Rust," Ensign, Nov. 1994, p. 73)

We discussed various uses of keys in the Church, keys are not dormant once someone is released, and they are bestowed to the next individual.  So, once a Bishop or Stake President is released we should not call them Bishop or President any longer.

 

Bishops are called by the 12, not by Stake Presidents.

 

Offices are ordained, there isn’t an end to them, callings on the other hand have a beginning and an end, and they are set apart, not ordained.  Offices in the Priesthood are a prime example of this.

 

Priesthood Organization and Keys

 

As mentioned earlier, to help accomplish the mission of the Church in an orderly manner, priesthood bearers in their various offices are organized into ecclesiastical groups called quorums. There are the five types of local quorums—deacons, teachers, priests, elders, and high priests—and three quorums that preside over the whole Church—Quorums of the Seventy, the Twelve Apostles, and the First Presidency, FN (See D&C 107:21-37; 124:125-45.) Bishops and patriarchs are not organized into quorums; they belong to the local quorum of high priests.

 

Other administrative units such as stake presidencies, stake high councils, bishoprics, and other regional or area groupings of priesthood bearers organized for particular purposes are more correctly identified as councils and not quorums. One simple way to distinguish these two terms is to remember that while all priesthood holders are organized into quorums, the Church members, whether priesthood holders or not, are governed by councils. FN

 

Sometimes confusion also arises from misunderstanding about two other terms associated with the priesthood: setting apart and keys of the priesthood. In establishing new leadership in any priesthood quorum, the person performing the ordinance sets apart the new leader and gives the president of the quorum any special keys, or authority, to function in his calling. These keys constitute the distinctive directive powers of presidency. fn Stake presidents are therefore called and set apart by a General Authority of the Church, who also gives him the keys of presidency over his stake. The stake president may then call and set apart elders quorum presidents and give them the keys of their office because that office comes under the jurisdiction of the stake president and the keys that he holds.

 

The quorums are not only organized to provide a group for joint instruction and united service, but they also provide a source of rich fellowship and a brotherhood far more valuable and lasting than found in any secular service or fraternal organization. Quorum members who have the vision of their brotherhood willingly care for each other and assist both temporally and spiritually in uplifting and edifying each other.

 

Indeed, we say that the PRIESTHOOD is the power and authority to act for God, and with it and through various priesthood councils, Christ's church administers to all members. Worthy men have the Aaronic or Melchizedek Priesthood conferred upon them, are ordained to offices in that priesthood, are organized into quorums, and are set apart and given keys to administer in certain callings. We recognize that, along with having God's power on earth, righteous use of this priesthood entails many responsibilities. We cannot take for granted the marvelous power given us and expect the priesthood to remain in power in our lives. Like the uniform and badge of a policeman, certain standards of righteousness and displays of service are recognizable emblems of a proper priesthood that remains in full force. As the priesthood is wisely used, both the priesthood bearer and those he serves are richly blessed and strengthened as they journey together on their way toward God's celestial realms.

 

(Victor L. Ludlow, Principles and Practices of the Restored Gospel [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1992], 537.)

 

President David O. McKay:

 

You have just heard a retirement speech from Bishop Carl W. Buehner. I believe it was Brother Critchlow who was released as president of the stake, who was called as one of the Assistants to the Twelve, who said, "When I was released as president of the stake, I looked upon it as a retirement. Now I find it is a retreading."

 

I would like to say to Bishop Buehner and Sister Buehner and those children who have looked forward to a time when Brother Buehner can sit with them in the evening chair and spend a happy retirement experience, "That the best laid schemes of mice and men gae aft agley."

 

 

(President David O. Mckay:, Conference Report, October 1961, Third Day—Morning Meeting 100.)

 

 

 

 

Gathering of Israel

 

February 26, 2004

 

 

 

The strength of the church was in Ohio, yet Ohio was a stop over for the establishment of Zion.

Salt Lake City is the same way today; the ultimate destination is the City of Zion.

 

D&C 29:1-2 – Hen gathereth her chicks under her wings, this means danger is coming and the Lord gives protection to those who obey His voice and keep their covenants.

 

Recently, to the faculty of the Church Educational System, President Boyd K. Packer of the Quorum of the Twelve declared that time is already upon us.  “The world is spiraling downward at an ever-quickening pace,” said President Packer, “I am sorry to tell you that it will not get better.”  He then declared: “I know of nothing in the history of the Church or in the history of the world to compare with our present circumstances.  Nothing happened in Sodom and Gomorrah which exceeds in wickedness and depravity that surrounds us now . . . . At Sodom and Gomorrah these things were localized.  Now they are spread across the world, and they are among us.” [xi]

To understand how the Spirit of the Lord is lost, the importance of the Spirit of the Lord must first be understood.  The Spirit of the Lord, also known as the light of Christ [xii] , is essential to man’s agency.  In order for agency to exist, there must be opposing choices, knowledge of the consequences of the choices, and enticement by the choices.  Speaking of this, President Harold B. Lee, said: “Father Lehi explained to his son that in order to accomplish that eternal purpose there must be opposition in all things, and that to every individual upon the earth there had to be given the right of free agency and also that there must be in the world the power to entice to do evil and the power to entice to do good.” [xiii]

Mormon taught that the light of Christ is the agent that entices men and women to do good (see Moroni 7:16-17).  On the other hand, Lehi explained that it is the “the will of the flesh and the evil which is therein, which giveth the spirit of the devil power to captivate” that entices men and women to do evil (2 Nephi 2:29).  Without the light of Christ there would be no agency.  With no enticement for good, man would naturally give way to the enticement for evil.  Therefore, the scriptures teach that the light of Christ “strives” to be with man (D&C 1:33; Genesis 6:3; Moses 8:17; 2 Nephi 26:11; Ether 2:15).

But the light of Christ may be lost.  Men lose the light of Christ when their pride leads them to continually sin against the light.  Speaking to the brother of Jared, the Lord said: “ye shall remember that my Spirit will not always strive with man; wherefore, if ye will sin until ye are fully ripe ye shall be cut off from the presence of the Lord” (Ether 2:15).  In addition, the attitude of the sinner towards sin plays a major role in the loss of the Spirit.  President George Albert Smith said: “The spirit of God continues to strive with men everywhere, as long as they make the effort to keep his commandments.  When men abandon the truth, refuse to do the right, the Lord of necessity withdraws his spirit and men are left to the buffetings of the adversary.” [xiv]   Likewise, President Spencer W. Kimball cautioned:  “Conscience warns but does not govern.  Conscience tells the individual when he is entering forbidden worlds, and it continues to prick until silenced by the will or by sin’s repetition.” [xv]

As one continues in sin, it becomes nearly impossible to repent.  President Kimball wrote, “A man may rationalize and excuse himself till the groove is so deep he cannot get out without great difficulty. . . And if the yielding person continues to give way he may finally reach the point of ‘no return.’  The Spirit will ‘not always strive with man.’(D&C 1:33.)” [xvi]   This is the most damnable aspect of continuing in sin.  “Free agency,” declared President Marion G. Romney, “possessed by any one person is increased or diminished by the use to which he puts it.  Every wrong decision one makes restricts the area in which he can thereafter exercise his agency.  The further one goes in the making of wrong decisions in the exercise of free agency, the more difficult it is for him to recover the lost ground.  One can, by persisting long enough, reach the point of no return.  He then becomes an abject slave.  By the exercise of his free agency, he has decreased the area in which he can act, almost to the vanishing point [

When a society as a whole reaches the point that the light of Christ no longer strives with them, then they are “ripe for destruction” (Alma 10:19; 37:28, 31; 45:16; Helaman 13:14).  Such was the condition of the people in the days of Noah as well as the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah.  Elder Neal A. Maxwell explained: “Being a loving Father, though deeply devoted to our free agency, there are times in human history when He simply could not continue to send spirits to this earth who would have had virtually no chance. This was the case with Sodom and Gomorrah and the cities of the plains.” [xviii]   “The children born into these cities had no choice at all left to them.  Such was the conformity in wickedness that babes could be born free, but not remain agents unto themselves.” [xix]   Likewise, President John Taylor taught: “Because in forsaking God, they lose sight of their eternal misery on many.  And hence the inhabitants of the old world, and of the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed, because it was better for them to die, and thus be deprived of their agency, which they abused, than entail so much misery on their posterity, and bring ruin upon millions of unborn persons.

 

D&C 1:1, Isaiah 48, and 1 Nephi 20 – They all deal with the gathering of the righteous from the wicked.  Bruce related the JST Genesis 19 scripture of Sodom and Gomorrah, how the 3 holy men got Lot and his family out of there before it was destroyed.  The same thing will happen in the last days, according to D&C 1:8, this is something the Quorum of the 12 will do.

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 1:8-9.)

 

8 And verily I say unto you, that they who go forth, bearing these tidings unto the inhabitants of the earth, to them is power given to seal both on earth and in heaven, the unbelieving and rebellious;

 

9 Yea, verily, to seal them up unto the day when the wrath of God shall be poured out upon the wicked without measure—

 

Bruce went through each verse of Section 1, a warning and a promise; he described the section as a chiasm.

 

"Knowing the Calamity"

(D&C 1)

 

GEORGE A. HORTON, JR.

 

A Modern Parable

 

They were singing, shouting, laughing, and talking about their personal victories and adventures as the boat carried them peacefully down the slow-moving river. In their merriment they did not notice a quiet quickening of the current. Their preoccupation with each other kept them from paying much attention to one who appeared on the nearby shore waving excitedly for them to make their way to safety. A few waved back with curious smiles but continued on with their immediate interests.

                                                                                                                  

"Rapids! Rapids! Falls! Change your direction! Come to shore quickly!" was the man's urgent call repeated over and over; but they were unconcerned until they happened to observe the faster current and looked ahead to see a short stretch of white-capped waves dashing around and over jagged rocks. An increasing roar indicated that suddenly the river would drop from sight, spilling into a roaring chasm of churning, foamy water.

 

With screams of horror they lunged for the oars and began to row frantically for shore. But it was too late—they had waited too long. The power of the current was too strong, and into the rapids they plunged—tossing, turning, shrieking, and cursing; finally over the falls they went to a watery grave.

 

Knowing that the world is largely preoccupied with material and physical pleasures as it drifts faster and faster toward the coming calamities, a loving Lord has called special servants to raise a resounding voice of warning—"Repent! Repent! Change your patterns of living before it is too late. 'Row' diligently toward the shore of the loving grace of Jesus Christ, follow the counsel of his prophets, and avoid the rocks and shoals of calamity and judgment that are just ahead."

 

The Lord's Preface

 

When the revelation that became known as section 1 of the Doctrine and Covenants was given in November 1831, the Lord designated it as "my preface unto the book of my commandments" (D&C 1:6. In this way he placed a sacred stamp of approval on these divinely authored revelations which would be published to the world to help mankind avoid impending judgments and gain eternal salvation. Section 1, an important outpouring of the Spirit, came during a conference at Hiram, Ohio at a time when there were probably less than one thousand members in the fledgling Restored Church. The young, newly-called disciples were charged with the responsibility not only to be true to their own covenants, but to share the new and everlasting covenants—the fulness of the gospel of Jesus Christ-with all the "inhabitants of the earth" (D&C 1:6). At the least, it was a superhuman task. After all, it was a time of no television, telephones, radios, or other means of modern mass communication except newspapers with limited circulation. There were no automobiles, airplanes, or even railroads available. Transportation was basically limited to horseback, carriages, riverboats, or ships, and often great distances had to be covered on foot.

 

Could such a monumental challenge—taking the message of the Restored kingdom of God to every nation, kindred, tongue, and people—be accomplished by such a small band of disciples? The Lord knew that it could, for his servants would "go forth and none shall stay them, for I the Lord have commanded them" (D&C 1:5). It was his work, and he would sustain it. As Joseph Smith, Jr., his chosen prophet to head this last dispensation, boldly declared: "No unhallowed hand can stop the work from progressing; persecutions may rage, mobs may combine, armies may assemble, calumny may defame, but the truth of God will go forth boldly, nobly, and independent till it has penetrated every continent, visited every clime, swept every country, and sounded in every ear, till the purpose of God has been accomplished, and the great Jehovah shall say the work is done." fn

 

The reception of section 1 on 1 November 1831 places it chronologically between sections 66 and 67. It was received when publication of the Book of Commandments was being proposed, and it was designated by the Lord to be the "preface" to the revelations (v. 6). The Book of Commandments, printed in 1833, contained 65 sections—similar in content and arrangement to the first 64 sections of our present Doctrine and Covenants. Only a few copies were preserved after a mob ransacked the W. W. Phelps Printing Co. at Independence, Missouri. Section 1 has retained its position in the front of the collection of revelations in all successive editions of the Doctrine and Covenants. fn

 

Most of the revelations to Joseph Smith (representing over ninety percent of the sections) were received during the light of day, generally in the presence of other people. Many persons saw and heard him pray, and the answers received were spoken aloud or dictated by him to his clerk as they listened. fn

 

Notes and Quotes

 

 Hearken (v. 1). To "hearken" is not only to hear, but to obey as well. The injunction to do so is directed "unto all men" (v. 2).

 

The voice of the Lord (v. 2). Jesus Christ is the Author and source of all true revelations given to the inhabitants of this earth. "All revelation since the Fall," taught President Joseph Fielding Smith, "has come through Jesus Christ, who is the Jehovah of the Old Testament. In all of the scriptures, where God is mentioned and where he has appeared, it was Jehovah who talked with Abraham, with Noah, Enoch, Moses and all the prophets. He is the God of Israel. . . . The Father has never dealt with man directly and personally since the Fall, and he has never appeared except to introduce and bear record of the Son. . . . In giving revelations our Savior speaks at times for himself; at other times for the Father, and yet it is Jesus Christ, our Redeemer who gives the message." fn All the revelations given in the Doctrine and Covenants were given by Jesus Christ (e.g., D&C 10:57; 27:1; 29:1; 62:1) or under his immediate direction.

 

There is none to escape (v. 2). Joseph Smith stated, "You cannot go anywhere but where God can find you out." fn

 

The rebellious (v. 3). This refers to "every soul who rejects the everlasting Gospel." fn

 

The voice of warning (v. 4). To the righteous it is a voice of hope, but to the wicked it is a notice of judgment and woe unless they repent.

 

Unto all people (v. 4). In the words of Joseph Fielding Smith, this book "belongs to all the world, to the Catholics, to the Presbyterians, to the Methodists, to the infidel, to the non-believer. It is his book if he will accept it, if he will receive it. . . . It belongs to all the world, not only to the Latter-day Saints. . . . They will be judged by it, and you will be judged by it." fn

 

Mine authority (v. 6). Section 1 contains "the credentials given by our Lord to the Prophet Joseph and his associates in the ministry, and by them transmitted to others, regularly called and ordained, giving them divine authority to preach the gospel and warn the world." fn

 

My preface (v. 6). A preface summarizes in advance the message of the author and prepares the reader to receive the content of the book in a proper perspective. This is "the only book in existence which bears the honor of a preface given by the Lord himself. . . . It was not written by Joseph Smith, but was dictated by Jesus Christ, and contains his and his Father's word to the Church and to all the world." fn

 

Power given them to seal (vv. 8-9). By the Holy Priesthood, power is given to perform those ordinances or other acts that have binding force unto salvation. Likewise, under the direction of the Holy Spirit, when covenants are broken or sacred truths have been flaunted, power is given to loose the binding ties and place "a seal" of disapprobation upon those who persist in unbelief and rebellion. The unrepentant transgressor will suffer the wrath of God.

 

Recompense unto every man according to his word (v. 10). For the full elaboration of the meaning of this verse, consider the whole of section 76. fn

 

Prepare ye (v. 12). This is a major theme of the Doctrine and Covenants with the injunction appearing about ninety times. It reflects the Lord's great desire to encourage his people to so live that they will be able to escape many of the impending judgments and be ready for his Second Coming. "Even today," wrote President Smith, "the cleansing process is going on, but eventually it will come with dreadful suddenness, and none who work iniquity shall escape." fn The Lord has said, "If ye are prepared ye shall not fear" (D&C 38:30).

 

The anger of the Lord (v. 13). God is infinitely patient and long-suffering, but the world has now exceeded the limits of justice, and even in love God can no longer forbear.

 

His sword (v. 13). The sword is a metaphor that symbolizes powerful judgments and destruction upon the wicked (see Isa. 34:5-6).

 

The arm of the Lord (v. 14). This represents the power of the Lord used either to protect or punish as the case requires (see Ex. 6:6; Ps. 136:12; Jer. 27:5).

 

Cut off (v. 14). This includes being severed from the community of believers, or excommunicated.

 

"For" (vv. 15-16). This is one of the most helpful key words used throughout the scriptures. What follows it usually reveals the specific reasons for an attitude or action. In this case the Lord's anger is expressed because his children have (a) strayed from his ordinances, (b) broken the everlasting covenant, and (c) succumbed to the worship of idols.

 

After the image of his own god (v. 16). President Spencer W. Kimball has taught: "Idolatry is among the most serious of sins. There are unfortunately millions today who prostrate themselves before images of gold and silver and wood and stone and clay. But the idolatry we are most concerned with here is the conscious worshipping of still other gods. Some are of metal and plush and chrome, and of wood and stone and of fabrics. They are not in the image of God or of man, but are developed to give man comfort and enjoyment, to satisfy his wants, ambitions, passions and desires. Some are in no physical form at all, but are intangible." President Kimball continued:

 

Many seem to "worship" on an elemental basis—they live to eat and drink. They are like the children of Israel who, though offered great freedoms associated with national development under God's personal guidance, could not lift their minds above the "flesh pots of Egypt." . . . They cannot seem to rise above satisfying their bodily appetites. . . .

 

Modern idols or false gods can take such forms as clothes, homes, businesses, machines, automobiles, pleasure boats, and numerous other material deflectors from the path of godhood. What difference does it make that the item concerned is not shaped like an idol? Brigham Young said: "I would as soon see a man worshipping a little god made of brass or of wood as to see him worshipping his property" (JD 6:196).

 

Intangible things make just as ready gods. Degrees and letters and titles can become idols. Many young men decide to attend college when they should be on missions first. The degree, and the wealth and the security which come through it, appear so desirable that the mission takes second place. Some neglect Church service through their college years, feeling to give preference to the secular training and ignoring the spiritual covenants they have made.

 

Many people build and furnish a home and buy the automobile first—and then find they "cannot afford" to pay tithing. Whom do they worship? Certainly not the Lord of heaven and earth, for we serve whom we love and give first consideration to the object of our affection and desires. Young married couples who postpone parenthood until their degrees are attained might be shocked if their expressed preference were labeled idolatry. fn

 

Babylon (v. 16). Throughout the scriptures, this ancient capital of the Babylonian Empire is used as the symbol for wickedness and depravity among men and nations. Thus the Lord has admonished his Saints in modern times: "Go ye out of Babylon" (D&C 133:7). This Babylon shall fall, as did the ancient city from which it derives its name.

 

Knowing the calamity which should come (v. 17). Because the Lord loves all men he has raised his voice and has sent his servants to encourage them to prepare, so that their chances of escaping the impending judgments will be greatly increased. The warning voice is one of hope and reassurance—a reminder that the Lord has never allowed a major calamity of judgment to come without forewarning. There is sufficient time to prepare, organize, and change our lives if we do not procrastinate. We must actively bring our lives into harmony with the great principles of eternal salvation in order to be ready for the judgments that will come upon an erring world. Can the Saints of the latter days learn any lessons from the experiences of Enoch's city, Noah's family, Jared and his brother, Lot and his daughters, Moses and Israel on Passover night, Nineveh at Jonah's time, Lehi and his family, Christians fleeing Jerusalem before the Roman destruction, and perhaps others who have heeded prophetic calls? Now the call is to this generation, to each one of us—to every living soul. How is today's world drifting toward troubled waters with catastrophies almost sure to follow? Who will hearken to the warning voice soon enough to be saved by making their way to the shore of salvation—through faith in the Lord Jesus Christ, repentance, keeping the commandments, and through a life of love and service?

 

Many judgments are mentioned by the prophets that will occur before the Second Coming. fn They are horrible to contemplate. Jesus wept over Jerusalem as he thought of the destruction that awaited it (Luke 19:41-44), and the Prophet Joseph also wept fn as he instructed the early Church leaders about the corruption and destruction that would come upon the wicked world. fn Surely it is not the Lord's desire that his children would have to suffer these judgments. fn

 

Most prophecy is conditional. Many scriptural cases could be cited to illustrate this point. The language of the text is usually something like this: IF you keep the commandments, THEN you will be blessed; BUT IF you do not keep the commandments, THEN the judgments will come upon you (cf. Lev. 26:3-4, 14, 24; Deut. 4:25-40; 28:1-2, 15; 2 Ne. 1:9-10; D&C 5:16-24). Thus we see that in the case of prophesied judgments they are usually contingent on whether a person or a people repent and change their iniquitous ways. A case in point is the wicked city of Ninevah which heeded Jonah's call to repent and was spared destruction (Jonah 3:10).

 

Recently an American President raised the question as to whether all the difficulties and wars in the Middle East were an inevitable prelude to the last great battle of Armageddon. To this query a Jewish newspaper correspondent made the following observation: "When the future is foreseen and foretold, it's not an unconditional, inevitable future. The outcome, whether redemptive or destructive, is always conditional—for it is dependent on human behavior in response to God's word." fn Indeed, most prophecies recorded in holy writ appear to be contingent on how people and nations live the covenants and commandments of the Lord. Is it possible, then, that the calamities that have been prophesied for the last days prior to the Second Coming of the Lord could be avoided? President Ezra Taft Benson, who shares in the call to provide the warning voice, spoke of these calamities: "These particular prophecies seem not to be conditional." fn He clarified the assertion by adding: "The Lord, with his foreknowledge, knows that they will happen. Some will come about through man's manipulations; others through the forces of nature and nature's God, but that they will come seems certain." fn This inevitability seems to be an outgrowth of man's failure to keep the commandments and his calculated willingness to persist in spiritual rebellion against his Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ. Therefore the Lord is able to declare that these calamities will come because he knows that the disposition of men—caught up in the priorities of the world—leaves no room for repentance in their hearts. Joseph Fielding Smith taught: "Men are rebellious. . . . They are not willing to receive the good things of the earth as the Lord would give them in abundance; but in their narrow-mindedness, shortsightedness, and in their greed and selfishness, they think they know better than the Lord does. And so, they pursue another course, and the result is that the blessings of the Lord are withdrawn, and in the place thereof come calamity, destruction, plagues, and violence. Men have themselves to blame." fn

 

President Smith explained: "We have been taught how we might avoid them. . . . Hear the counsels that come to us, heed the testimony of truth. . . . We may escape these things through faithfulness." fn The Lord has offered hope: "Zion shall escape if she observe to do all things whatsoever I have commanded her. But if she observe not to do whatsoever I have commanded her, I will visit her according to all her works" (D&C 97:25-26). During the impending wars, as the wicked slay the wicked, the situation will be so severe that "the saints also shall hardly escape" (D&C 63:34). They are admonished to "gather together, and stand in holy places," e.g., stakes of Zion (D&C 101:22).

 

Another aspect of this question is reflected in the Prophet Joseph's statement that "it is a false idea that the saints will escape all the judgments, whilst the wicked suffer; for all flesh is subject to suffer. . . . Many of the righteous shall fall prey to disease, to pestilence, etc., by reason of the weakness of the flesh, and yet be saved in the Kingdom of God." fn As another writer has explained, "It would be wrong to assume that the more righteous one is . . . the less he will suffer. . . . He will be blessed even though his blessings may be strength to endure suffering. . . . The difference is that the wicked must suffer the consequences of their sins in addition to the suffering that is part of life. . . . Those who live faithful to their covenants can be assured that they will not have to suffer in vain." fn Elder Bruce R. McConkie has further declared: "We do not say that all the Saints will be spared and saved from the coming day of desolation. But we do say there is no promise of safety . . . except for those who love the Lord and who are seeking to do all that he commands. It may be, for instance, that nothing except the power of faith and the authority of the priesthood can save individuals and congregations from the atomic holocausts that surely shall be." fn

 

President Joseph F. Smith gave additional perspective: "Severe natural calamities are visited upon men by the Lord for the good of his children, to quicken their devotion to others, and to bring out their better natures. . . . They are the heralds and tokens of his final judgment, and the schoolmasters to teach the people to prepare themselves by righteous living for the coming of the Savior." fn On another occasion he taught that "judgment is not an end in itself. Calamities are only permitted by a merciful Father, in order to bring about redemption. Behind the fearful storms of judgment, which often strike the just and the unjust alike . . . there arises bright and clear the dawn of the day of salvation." fn In summary: "All through the ages some of the righteous have had to suffer because of the acts of the unrighteous, but they will get their reward," fn for "the Lord receiveth them up unto himself, in glory" (Alma 14:11).

 

The Lord knows what is coming. Through his servants and these revelations he has forewarned all men in order that they might gain strength, exercise faith, enter into covenants, and be prepared for whatever comes. Thus, "knowing the calamity which should come upon the inhabitants of the earth," the Lord has called upon his servant Joseph Smith and others and has opened the heavens to them, revealing to the Saints and to the world the things of eternity. Thereby the people of God can prepare for the day of judgment and blessing. The Doctrine and Covenants contains many of those revelations.

 

My servant Joseph (v. 17). The Lord chose him! Of the millions out of every nation who could have been called to head this last and greatest of all gospel dispensations—the fulness of times and the period of the restitution of all things—the Lord chose a New York farm boy. But Joseph was more than that. Was he not one of the "noble and great ones" in the premortal councils? (Abr. 3:22; D&C 138:53). Was not his ministry foreseen by ancient prophets? (JST, Gen. 50:27, 33; Isa. 11:1; 29:12; 2 Ne. 3:11, 15). Was he not foreordained? "Every man who has a calling to minister to the inhabitants of the world was ordained to that very purpose in the Grand Council of heaven before the world was," Joseph said. "I suppose I was ordained to this very office in the Grand Council." fn Joseph magnificently fulfilled his calling as First Elder, Apostle, Prophet, Seer, Revelator, and Translator in an unsurpassed mortal ministry climaxed by martyrdom. The statement that he had "done more, save Jesus only, for the salvation of men in this world, than any other man that ever lived" was merited (D&C 135:3). Elder Stephen L Richards said, "My grandfather [Willard Richards] was a close friend and companion of this man. He knew him as intimately as one man may know another. He had abundant opportunity to detect any flaws in his character and discover any deceit in his work. He found none, and he has left his testimony to his family and to all the world that this man was true, that he was divinely commissioned for the work he had to do, and that he gave his life to the fulfillment of his mission." fn

 

"That" (v. 18). This is another important word in scriptural interpretation because it alerts us to the desired consequences of an action. The Lord called Joseph and others in order that (a) they could proclaim this message, (b) the message would be fulfilled, (c) men would know the Lord and could speak in his name, (d) faith would increase, and (e) the fulness of the gospel would be proclaimed before the great and the humble. All of these purposes are now in the process of fulfillment.

 

Trust in the arm of flesh (v. 19). Refers to the weakness and imperfections of man when trusting in his own power.

 

The weak and the simple (v. 23). As Joseph Fielding Smith taught, "The Lord's ways are not man's ways, and he cannot choose those who in their own judgment are too wise to be taught. Therefore he chooses those who are willing to be taught and he makes them mighty even to the breaking down of the great and the mighty." fn

 

After the manner of their language (v. 24). One Latter-day Saint writer has observed:

 

The word of the Lord can be only in the language of the prophet when the ideas received are clothed in the prophet's own words. If the prophet's language is faulty and he is subject in his speech to the grammatical errors common to most of us, we may expect grammatical mistakes in the written revelation until they are discovered and eradicated. The mistakes are not the mistakes of God. In all the revelations received by men from God, as portrayed in the Bible, this human element is present The poet clothes the message of God in beautiful phraseology and sets in to meter; the psalmist sets it to music, while the writer of prose stamps it indelibly with his own style. Thus the writings of Moses, Isaiah, Micah, Amos, and Habbakuk are different in style and perfection of expression, but all are the word of God spoken through prophets in their language that mankind might come to understanding. fn

 

What was the status of Joseph Smith's English during the period of the late 1820s and 1830s when the majority of these revelations were given? During this time Noah Webster was proposing many spelling changes in order to have a somewhat unique "American" English. In 1828, when he introduced his big "American Dictionary of the English Language," there were already five other dictionaries being used in the United States with variant spellings. Phonetic spelling (i.e., words spelled as they are pronounced) was very common, and some of Webster's 'new' spellings with a phonetic emphasis were accepted. This reflects a continually changing language. Therefore, the grammar also was not as standardized as it now is. Despite all of this, people were able to communicate effectively with each other, contributing to the Lord's objective—"that they might come to understanding" of his revelations given through the Holy Spirit to his chosen prophet.

 

In what language do the revelations of God come? Do they come in the pure Adamic language? Ancient Hebrew? Aramaic? Greek? Reformed Egyptian? No! They come to the prophet like they do any other humble disciple—in his own language: "These commandments are of me, and were given unto my servants in their weakness, after the manner of their language, that they might come to understanding" (D&C 1:24). Elder George A. Smith suggested that "when the Lord reveals anything to men, he reveals it in language that accords with their own. If any of you were to converse with an angel, and you used strictly grammatical language, he would do the same, but if you used two negatives in a sentence, the heavenly messenger would use language to correspond with your understanding." fn

 

When Joseph was criticized in 1834 for "glaring errors" in a published revelation, he replied that shades of meaning or literary mechanics were not as important as the general message: "We did not think so much of the orthography [spelling], or the manner, as we did the subject matter; as the word of God means what it says." fn

 

The words are abundantly clear! The message given through his chosen prophet to a drifting world needs little explanation. The voice of warning, coming, as it were, from the nearby shore is clear: Hearken! Repent before it is too late! "Prepare ye, prepare ye for that which is to come. . ." (D&C 1:12). "Search these commandments, for they are true and faithful, and the prophecies and promises which are in them shall all be fulfilled. What I the Lord have spoken, I have spoken . . . and though the heavens and the earth pass away, my word . . . shall all be fulfilled, whether by my own voice or by the voice of my servants, it is the same" (D&C 1:37-38).

 

Inasmuch as (vv. 25-28). Several conditions are mentioned which would keep a person consciously or unconsciously alienated from the Lord and what must be done to overcome such problems—instruction, repentance, and humility would allow one to receive knowledge, be made strong, and receive the Lord's blessings.

 

Having received the record (vv. 29-30). It would be difficult to overestimate the key role played by the Book of Mormon in the restoration of the true Church of Jesus Christ. Its self-professed objectives include being another witness of Jesus Christ and the confounding of false doctrines. Elder Bruce R. McConkie has said:

 

The Prophet's expression that "the Book of Mormon is the keystone of our religion" means precisely what it says. The keystone is the central stone in the top of the arch. If that stone is removed, then the arch crumbles, which, in effect, means that Mormonism so-called—which actually is the gospel of Christ, restored anew in this day—stands or falls with the truth or the falsity of the Book of Mormon. . . .

 

The Book of Mormon—which has come forth to prove that God inspires men and calls them to his holy work in this age and generation—establishes the verity of these great truths which comprise the message of the restoration. If the Book of Mormon is true, our message to the world is truth; the truth of this message is established in and through this book. . .

 

This book is a witness of the divine mission of the Prophet Joseph Smith and of the divinity of the Church set up under his instrumentality. It establishes and proves to the world that Joseph Smith is a prophet for he received the book from a resurrected personage and translated it by the gift and power of God. And since the Book of Mormon came by revelation, which included the ministering of angels, then obviously Joseph Smith also received other revelations and was ministered to by other heavenly beings. Among those revelations was the command to organize the Church. The Church is thus the one true Church because it was set up by a prophet acting under command of god. Thus the truth of the message of the restoration is established in and through and by means of the Book of Mormon." fn

 

Brigham Young taught, "There is not a man or a woman who on hearing the report of the Book of Mormon, but the Spirit of the Almighty has testified to them of its truth; neither have they heard the name of Joseph Smith but the Spirit has whispered to them, 'He is a true prophet."' fn Similarly, President Ezra Taft Benson said, "The Book of Mormon was written for us today. God is the author of the Book. It is a record of a fallen people, compiled by inspired men for our blessing today. Those people never had the book—it was meant for us. Mormon, the ancient prophet after whom the book is named, abridged centuries of records. God, who knows the end from the beginning, told him what to include in his abridgment that we would need for our day." fn

 

Speaking unto the Church (v. 30). Elder James E. Talmage observed: "I have no concern for the Church as a whole; its destiny is foretold, it is going on to a glorious victory [sec. 65]. But that does not say that each of us who are members of the Church will go on to glorious victory. . . . What are we doing individually?" fn

 

With the least degree of allowance (vv. 31-32). This verse is a solemn reminder to the sinner that he cannot be justified in sin (cf. 2 Ne. 28:8-9) but through sincere repentance can receive loving forgiveness. President Harold B. Lee taught:

 

If the time comes when you have done all that you can to repent of your sins, whoever you are, wherever you are, and have made amends and restitution to the best of your ability; if it be something that will affect your standing in the Church and you have gone to the proper authorities, then you will want that confirming answer as to whether or not the Lord has accepted of you. In your soul-searching, if you seek for and you find that peace of conscience, by that token you may know that the Lord has accepted of your repentance. Satan would have you think otherwise and sometimes persuade you that now having made one mistake, you might go on and on with no turning back. That is one of the great falsehoods. The miracle of forgiveness is available to all of those who turn from their evil doings and return no more." fn

 

As the Prophet Joseph Smith said, "Our Heavenly Father is more liberal in his views, and boundless in his mercies and blessings, than we are ready to believe or receive; and, at the same time, is more terrible to the workers of iniquity, more awful in the execution of his punishments, and more ready to detect every false way, than we are apt to suppose him to be." fn

 

My Spirit shall not always strive (v. 33). "The Spirit He has withdrawn from the world is not the Holy Ghost (for they never had that!)," explained Joseph Fielding Smith, "but it is the light of truth, spoken of in our scriptures as the Spirit of Christ, which is given to every man that cometh into the world. . . . Not because the Lord desires to withdraw that Spirit, but because of the wickedness of mankind, it becomes necessary that this Spirit of the Lord be withdrawn." fn

 

No respecter of persons (v. 35). The Lord is not partial and "grants to each man, if he will repent, the same privileges and opportunities of salvation and exaltation." fn

 

Peace shall be taken from the earth (v. 35). The First Presidency in the days of Brigham Young stated: "We know that the revelations of Jesus Christ are true, and that peace is taken from the earth, and that those who will not receive and obey the Gospel of Jesus Christ, when they hear it, will grow worse and worse, in evil passions, strife, war, and blood, until the wicked shall have overthrown the wicked and destroyed themselves from the face of the earth." fn "The beginning of the fulfillment of this day when peace was taken from the earth appears to be at the commencement of the Civil War." fn President Wilford Woodruff wrote:

 

When I have the vision of the night opened continually before my eyes, and can see the mighty judgments that are about to be poured out upon this world, when I know these things are true . . . and while I am holding this position before God and this world, can I withhold my voice from lifting up a warning to this people, and to the nations of the earth? . . . God has held the angels of destruction for many years, lest they should reap down the wheat with the tares. But I want to tell you now, that those angels have left the portals of heaven, and they stand over this people and this nation now, and are hovering over the earth waiting to pour out the judgments. And from this very day they shall be poured out. Calamities and troubles are increasing in the earth, and there is a meaning to these things. . . . If you do your duty, and I do my duty, we'll have protection." fn

 

The Lord shall come down (v. 36). From President Harold B. Lee: "One of the ways by which 'he comes down among his people' is clearly explained in the revelation in which he defines certain gifts of the Spirit . . . which men might enjoy," i.e., D&C 46. fn

 

Idumea, or the world (v. 36). "Idumea or Edom," noted Bruce R. McConkie, "was a nation to the south of the Salt Sea, through which the trade route (called the King's Highway) ran between Egypt and Arabia. The Idumeans . . . were a wicked non-Israelitish people; hence, traveling through their country symbolized to the prophetic mind the pilgrimage of men through a wicked world; and so, Idumea meant the world." fn

 

Search these commandments (v. 37). Read? Study? Indeed even more—search! "Search the scriptures—search the revelations which we publish," Joseph Smith pleaded, "and ask your Heavenly Father, in the name of his Son Jesus Christ, to manifest the truth unto you, and if you do it with an eye single to his glory nothing doubting, he will answer you by the power of His Holy Spirit. You will then know for yourselves and not for another. You will not then be dependent on man for the knowledge of God; nor will there be any room for speculation." fn "All members of the Church are commanded to search and obey these commandments. . . . If we fail to do so and remain ignorant of the doctrines, covenants, and commandments, we shall stand condemned." fn

 

Conclusion

 

Dear Reader: This voice of warning is also a voice of love and reassurance. It is like the voice of one calling from the shore to "row" to safety before it is too late. Let those who love the Lord rejoice and let them sing: "In faith we'll rely on the arm of Jehovah to guide through these last days of trouble and gloom; and after the scourges and harvest are over, we'll rise with the just when the Savior doth come." fn

 

Notes on "Knowing the Calamity"

 

1. HC 4:540.

 

2. For the history of the Doctrine and Covenants, see Robert J. Woodford, "The Doctrine and Covenants: A Historical Overview," found herein. For more information on the seven "Lectures on Faith" which appeared in all printings of the Doctrine and Covenants between 1835 and 1921, refer to HC 2:175-76 (and note), 180; Joseph Fielding Smith, Doctrines of Salvation, comp. Bruce R. McConkie, 3 vols. (Salt Lake City, Bookcraft, 1954-56), 2:3034; Bruce R. McConkie, Mormon Doctrine, 2nd ed. (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1966), p. 439.

 

3. For additional information on the process of revelation, see sections 8, 9, 18, and 68; see also Joseph F. McConkie, "The Principle of Revelation," found herein.

 

4. Smith, Doctrines of Salvation, 1:27; cf. Ex. 6:3 and D&C 110:1-4.

 

5. HC 6:366.

 

6. Hyrum M. Smith and Janne M. Sjodahl, Doctrine and Covenants Commentary, revised ed. (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1965), p. 5.

 

7. Joseph Fielding Smith, Conference Report, October 1919, p. 146.

 

8. Smith and Sjodahl, Commentary, p. 5.

 

9. Joseph Fielding Smith, Church History and Modern Revelation, 2 vols. (Salt Lake City: The Council of the Twelve Apostles of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 1953), 1:252.

 

10. See Larry E. Dahl, "The Vision of the Glories," found herein.

 

11. Smith, Church History and Modern Revelation, 1:254.

 

12. The Miracle of Forgiveness (Sale Lake City: Bookcraft, 1969), pp. 40-1; see also "The False Gods We Worship," Ensign, June 1976, pp. 3-6.

 

13. The judgments most prominently mentioned by the prophets that will occur before the Second Coming include the following: pestilence, overflowing rain, great hailstones, fire and brimstone (Ezek. 38:22); the abomination that maketh desolate (Dan. 11:31); wonders in the heavens, and in the earth, blood, and fire, and pillars of smoke (Joel 2:30); the fire of the Lord's jealousy (Zeph. 3:8); a plague that will consume eyes, tongue, mouth, feet, and flesh (Zech. 14:12); famines, pestilences, and earthquakes (Matt. 24:7); a desolating scourge or sickness (D&C 5:19; 45:31); desolations (D&C 29:8; 35:11; 45:19, 1, 1, 3; 84:114, 17; 88:85; 112:24); the destruction of the great and abominable church (D&C 29:21; 88:94); the darkening of the sun, the moon turning to blood, and stars falling from heaven (D&C 29:14; 34:9; 45:42; 88:87; 133:49); flies and maggots eating the flesh, a great hailstorm to destroy the crops, flesh falling from the bones, eyes from their sockets; beasts of the forest devouring people (D&C 29:16-20); lightnings, thunderings, and earthquakes wreaking havoc (D&C 43:25; 45:33; 87:6; 88:89-90); wars upon the face of the earth (D&C 45:26; 63; 63:33; 87); the sea heaving itself beyond its bounds (D&C 88:90); a sore affliction, pestilence, the sword, vengeance, and a devouring fire (D&C 97:25-28); and a very destructive whirlwind (D&C 112:24). To the foregoing, modern prophets have added floods, withdrawal of the Spirit from the earth, bands of Gadianton robbers infesting every nation, immorality, murder, and crime increasing, and the assurance that every man's hand is against his brother. See Smith, Doctrines of Salvation, 3:29, 34; Bruce R. McConkie, Conference Report, April 1979, pp. 131-32.

 

14. Smith, Doctrines of Salvation, 3:29.

 

15. TPJS, pp. 47-49, 87, 161-63, 252-53.

 

16. Smith, Doctrines of Salvation, 3:28.

 

17. Yehezkiel Landau, "Presidents and Prophets," Jerusalem Post, 4 November 1983.

 

18. Ensign, January 1974, p. 68.

 

19. Ibid., p. 69.

 

20. Smith, Doctrines of Salvation, 3:28.

 

21. Ibid., pp. 32, 34.

 

22. HC 4:11.

 

23. Book of Mormon 121-122 Student Manual, 2nd ed. (Sale Lake City: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 1981), p. 185.

 

24. Conference Report April 1979, pp. 132-33.

 

25. Gospel Doctrine, 13th ed. (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1963), p. 55.

 

26. Improvement Era 9 (June 1906):651.

 

27. Smith, Doctrines of Salvation, 3:37.

 

28. TPJS, p. 365.

 

29. Conference Report, October 1951, p. 117.

 

30. Church History and Modern Revelation, 1:255.

 

31. William E. Berrett, Teachings of the Doctrine and Covenants (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1968), pp. 4-5.

 

32. JD 12:335.

 

33. Letter to Edward Partridge, William W. Phelps, et al., 30 March 1834, from Oliver Cowdery's Letter Book, pp. 30-36. Quoted in Dean C. Jessee, ea., The Personal Writings of Joseph Smith (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1984), p.315.

 

34. Conference Report, April 1961, pp. 39-40.

 

35. Brigham Young, quoted by B. H. Roberts, Ibid., April 1905, p. 45.

 

36. Ezra Taft Benson, Ibid., April 1975, p.94.

 

37. James E. Talmage, Ibid., October 1928, p.118.

 

38. Harold B. Lee, Ibid., April 1973, pp. 177-78; cf. Mosiah 4:2-3.

 

39. TPJS, p. 257.

 

40. "The Predicted Judgments," Speeches of the Year (Provo, Ut.: Brigham Young University Extension Publications, 1967), pp. 5-6; an address delivered at Brigham Young University, 21 March 1967.

 

41. Smith, Church History and Modern Revelation, 1:255.

 

42. The First Presidency, Brigham Young, Heber C. Kimball, and Willard Richards, Millennial Star 15 (9 July 1853): 437.

 

43. Smith and Sjodahl, Commentary, p. 10.

 

44. Young Woman's Journal 5 (24 June 1894): 512-13.

 

45. Conference Report, October 1960, p. 16.

 

46. Mormon Doctrine, p 374.

 

47. TPJS, pp. 11-12.

 

48. Smith, Church History and Modern Revelation, 1:256.

 

49. Hymns of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter day Saints (Salt Lake City: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 1948), Hymn no. 118, v. 3.

 

 

(Robert L. Millet and Kent P. Jackson, eds., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 1: The Doctrine and Covenants [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1989], 39.)

 

D&C 63:52-54 – The earth must be cleansed before the King can come; the fate of the wicked will be sealed.

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 63:52-54.)

 

52 Wherefore, for this cause preached the apostles unto the world the resurrection of the dead.

 

53 These things are the things that ye must look for; and, speaking after the manner of the Lord, they are now nigh at hand, and in a time to come, even in the day of the coming of the Son of Man.

 

54 And until that hour there will be foolish virgins among the wise; and at that hour cometh an entire separation of the righteous and the wicked; and in that day will I send mine angels to pluck out the wicked and cast them into unquenchable fire.

 

 

 

D&C 115:4-6 – The church is the ark of safety for our day, it must be worldwide so the ones who are gathered have a place of refuge.

 

D&C 1:14 – The arm of the Lord = the power of the Lord

 

 

D&C 1:17 – Bruce shared his testimony that Joseph was and is the prophet for this dispensation.   The integrity of our prophets are intact, we will not be left alone, nor lead astray.  President Hinckley continues to push the work, temples throughout the world.

Bruce told the story of Sidney Rigdon challenging the Missouri saints to keep their covenants that were made during Moses time, how Joshua made the same challenge in Joshua 24.

 

John Whitmer wrote the following concerning the dedication of the new Zion and the temple site:

 

And by the special protection of the Lord, Bro. Joseph Smith, Junior, and Sidney Rigdon, in company with eight other elders, with the church from Colesville, New York, consisting of about sixty souls, arrived in the month of July and by revelation the place was made known where the temple shall stand and the city should commence. . . . On the second day of August, 1831, Brother Sidney Rigdon stood up and asked, saying.  Do you receive this land for the land of your inheritance with thankful hearts from the Lord? Answer from all, we do. Do you pledge yourselves to keep the laws of God on this land which you have never kept in your own land? We do.

 

Do you pledge yourselves to see that others of your brethren who shall come hither do keep the laws of God? We do. After prayer he arose and said, I now pronounce this land consecrated and dedicated to the Lord for a possession and inheritance for the Saints, (in the name of Jesus Christ, having authority from him.) And for all the faithful servants of the Lord to the remotest ages of time. Amen.

 

The day following eight elders, viz., Joseph Smith, Junior, Oliver Cowdery, Sidney Rigdon, Peter Whitmer, Junior, Frederick G. Williams, William W. Phelps, Martin Harris, and Joseph Coe, assembled together where the temple is to be erected. Sidney Rigdon dedicated the ground where the city is to stand, and Joseph Smith, Junior, laid a stone at the northeast corner of the contemplated temple in the name of the Lord Jesus of Nazareth. After all present had rendered thanks to the Great Ruler of the universe, Sidney Rigdon pronounced this spot of ground wholly dedicated unto the Lord for ever. Amen (Book of John Whitmer, chap. 9).

 

Whitmer claimed that the foregoing account was first written by Oliver Cowdery (see Ibid.). Although the History of the Church, 1:199, notes that Joseph Smith dedicated the temple spot, John Whitmer's account (above), credits Rigdon with that action, and the Times and Seasons 5 (1 March 1844):450, does not identify the individual that dedicated the site.

 

 

(Lyndon W. Cook, The Revelations of the Prophet Joseph Smith: A Historical and Biographical Commentary of the Doctrine and Covenants [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1985],.)

 

 

Enoch had 365 years to establish Zion; we don’t have that kind of time!  According to Elder Maxwell, the youth of today have a greater capacity for obedience and are reserved for our time.

 

President Bednar told this story in a devotional address in January 2004 at BYUI.

 

Happiness and Obedience and the Youth of the Church

In October of 1997 Elder Neal A. Maxwell visited our campus to speak in a devotional. Sister Bednar and I provided transportation to and from the Idaho Falls airport for Elder and Sister Maxwell, and we hosted them for lunch in our home. The time we spent with this mighty Apostle and his lovely wife before and after the devotional was invaluable, and the lessons we learned were priceless. As we talked together about a variety of gospel topics in general and the youth of the Church in particular, Elder Maxwell made a statement that greatly impressed me. He said, The youth of this generation have a greater capacity for obedience than any previous generation.He then indicated that his statement was based upon a principle taught by Elder George Q. Cannon in the early days of the Restoration. Please listen carefully to the following statement by Elder Cannon:

 

God has reserved spirits for this dispensation who have the courage and determination to face the world, and all the powers of the evil one, visible and invisible, to proclaim the Gospel, and maintain the truth, and establish and build up the Zion of our God, fearless of all consequences. He has sent these spirits in this generation to lay the foundation of Zion never more to be overthrown, and to raise up a seed that will be righteous, and that will honor God, and honor him supremely, and be obedient to him under all circumstances (Journal of Discourses, 11:230 [May 6, 1866], emphasis added).

 

We frequently are reminded by our church leaders that the young men and women of this generation have been reserved for this day and are some of the most valiant of Heavenly Father’s children. But these additional insights by Elders Cannon and Maxwell help us further to understand that today’s young people have a greater capacity for obedience and are to be valiant and . . . obedient to him under all circumstances. And an additional and important implication of these teachings is clear: those blessed with the greatest capacity to obey also have the greatest opportunity for true and lasting happiness.

 

D&C 1:24-27 – There is a difference between sins and mistakes, Elder Oaks gave a talk on the subject.

 

Sins and Mistakes

By Elder Dallin H. Oaks
Of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles
Ensign, Oct. 1996, pp. 62-67

I wish to reason about a basic principle given in modern revelation but not as well understood or applied as it should be. This principle was given to guide us in our relationships with one another. It is especially important for parents with teenage children.

Three verses of the Doctrine and Covenants identify an important contrast between sins and mistakes. I had never pondered these verses until about one year ago when I was reading the Doctrine and Covenants for the 15th or 20th time. Their direction came to my mind with such freshness and impact that I thought they might have been newly inserted in my book. That is the way with prayerful study of the scriptures. The scriptures do not change, but we do, and so the same scriptures can give us new insights every time we read them.

The 20th section of the Doctrine and Covenants, given the same month the Church was organized, is the basic revelation on Church government. It contains one verse giving this important direction: "Any member of the church of Christ transgressing, or being overtaken in a fault, shall be dealt with as the scriptures direct" (D&C 20:80). The clear implication of this verse is that "transgressing" is different from being "overtaken in a fault," but that either type of action is to be dealt with as the scriptures direct.

The scriptures contain various directions for dealing with members, but the key direction is contained in two verses in the November 1831 revelation given as the preface to the book that is now the Doctrine and Covenants. These verses follow the Lord's explanation that he has given his servants the commandments in that book "after the manner of their language, that they might come to understanding" (D&C 1:24). Succeeding verses clarify the difference between error and sin and give distinctly different directions for the correction of each:

"Inasmuch as they erred it might be made known … 

"And inasmuch as they sinned they might be chastened, that they might repent" (D&C 1:25, 27).

In these verses, "transgressing" is different from "being at fault," and "to err" is different than "to sin." I believe that in these scriptures sin and transgression mean the same thing. Similarly, "to err" and "to be at fault" are also equivalent. In referring to this second category, I will use the more familiar description: "to make a mistake."

Both sins and mistakes can hurt us and both require attention, but the scriptures direct a different treatment. Chewing on a live electrical cord or diving headfirst into water of uncertain depth are mistakes that should be made known so that they can be avoided. Violations of the commandments of God are sins that require chastening and repentance. In the treatment process we should not require repentance for mistakes, but we are [page 63] commanded to preach the necessity of repentance for sins.
 

Mistakes Are Not Sins

My first illustration uses words I learned as a young boy reading a mail-order catalog. In those days, each item of merchandise in the catalog was offered in three different qualities: good, better, and best. The catalog didn't use the word bad, but if I could add that word I would have four words that permit me to illustrate my first point with clarity. For most of us, most of the time, the choice between good and bad is easy. What usually causes us difficulty is determining which uses of our time and influence are merely good, or better, or best. Applying that fact to the question of sins and mistakes, I would say that a deliberately wrong choice in the contest between what is clearly good and what is clearly bad is a sin, but a poor choice among things that are good, better, and best is merely a mistake.

Mortals make those kinds of mistakes all the time. We can read some of them in Church history. I believe some of the persecutions our forefathers endured were a result of their sins. The Lord told them so by revelation (see D&C 101:2). I believe some of their persecutions were also the result of mistakes. Thus, Sidney Rigdon's defiant "salt sermon," which contributed to conditions that brought about the Saints' expulsion from Missouri, was probably a mistake. Similarly, some mistaken decisions on Kirtland banking policies plagued the Saints for more than a decade. These financial difficulties were perhaps portended in the Lord's warning to the Prophet Joseph Smith that "in temporal labors thou shalt not have strength, for this is not thy calling" (D&C 24:9).

On a more personal level, consider the mistake described by Truman G. Madsen: "In a relaxed moment one day the Prophet [Joseph Smith] turned to his secretary, Howard Coray, and said, 'Brother Coray I wish you were a little larger. I would like to have some fun with you,' meaning wrestling. Brother Coray said, 'Perhaps you can as it is.' The Prophet reached and grappled him and twisted him over--and broke his leg. All compassion, he carried him home, put him in bed, and splinted and bandaged his leg" (Joseph Smith the Prophet [1989], 31).

In teaching the Saints not to accuse one another, the Prophet said, "What many people call sin is not sin" ( , sel. Joseph Fielding Smith, [1976], 193). I believe that the large category of actions that are mistakes rather than sins illustrates the truth of that statement. If we would be more understanding of one another's mistakes, being satisfied merely to correct and not to chasten or call to repentance, we would surely promote loving and living together in greater peace and harmony.

The appropriateness of that approach as applied to mistakes is surely illustrated by the Prophet Joseph Smith's well-known teachings to the first Relief Society. There he taught the sisters to be kind and loving toward those who made mistakes, and also toward sinners. He said:

"Suppose that Jesus Christ and holy angels should object to us on frivolous things, what would become of us? We must be merciful to one another, and overlook small things. … 

"Nothing is so much calculated to lead people to forsake sin as to take them by the hand, and watch over them with tenderness. When persons manifest the least kindness and love to me, O what power it has over my mind, while the opposite course has a tendency to harrow up all the harsh feelings and depress the human mind. … 

"… There should be no license for sin, but mercy should go hand in hand with reproof" (Teachings, 240-41).

The book of Proverbs is filled with advice on mistakes or errors, and the word most frequently applied to the person who fails to behave appropriately in these areas is the word fool. Our dictionary defines a fool as a person lacking in judgment or prudence. A fool is a fool, not a sinner. Our English writers understood that difference and used it in their frequent contrast of fools and knaves.

Proverbs says that "a fool uttereth all his mind: but a wise man keepeth it in till afterwards" (Prov. 29:11). The Old Testament's usage of the word fool is evident in Saul's confession "I have played the fool, and have erred exceedingly" (1 Sam. 26:21). Stimulated by that expression, an English playwright penned these lines, which remind us of mortality's abundant field for foolish conduct.
 

When we play the fool, how wide

The theatre expands! beside,

How long the audience sits before us!

How many prompters! what a chorus!

(Walter Savage Landor, quoted in John Bartlett, Familiar Quotations, 16th ed., [1992], 388)
 

The Savior used the term fool to characterize the lesson in his parable about the rich man who built greater barns to store his abundant fruits and goods and then said to his soul, "Thou hast much goods laid up for many years; take thine ease, eat, drink, and be merry" (Luke 12:19). [page 64] Then the Savior taught:

"God said unto him, Thou fool, this night thy soul shall be required of thee: then whose shall those things be, which thou hast provided?

"So is he that layeth up treasure for himself, and is not rich toward God" (Luke 12:20-21).

The distinction between sins and mistakes is important to our actions in the realm of politics and public policy debates. We have seen some very bitter finger-pointing among Latter-day Saints who disagree with one another on the policies a government should follow, the political parties they should support, or the persons they should elect as public servants. Such disagreements are inevitable in representative government. But it is not inevitable that they would result in the personal denunciations and bitter feelings described in the press or encountered in personal conversations.

We put political disagreements in the appropriate context when we remember that even if our political adversaries are making the wrong choice (as we suppose), that is generally a matter of error (mistake) rather than transgression (sin). (Of course, there are some public policies so intertwined with moral issues that there may be only one morally right position, but that is rare.)

The inspired direction we have received regarding differences of opinion on decisions or policies in the realm of error rather than transgression is to attempt correction by civil discourse, but not to denounce or attempt to chasten the perpetrators as sinners.

In an interview with the press, President Howard W. Hunter said that one of our objectives as a church is "to change the world and its thinking." Identifying how we need to go about that task, President Hunter said, "We have an obligation, as Christians--as members of the Church--and we call upon all people to be more kind and more considerate--whether it be in our homes, in our businesses, in our relations in society." Concluding this plea, he said that we have a responsibility to teach "a Christ-like response to all the problems of the world" (Gerry Avant, "Prophet Focuses on Christ's Message," Church News, 9 July 1994, 3). Understanding and applying the distinction between sins and mistakes will help us fulfill that divinely imposed responsibility.

The scriptures and our leaders have also taught us principles that require a loving approach to those with whom we have any kind of disagreement on matters of religious belief. In one of the great prophecies that concluded his ministry, the prophet Nephi described the false churches of the last days that would teach "false and vain and foolish doctrines" (2 Ne. 28:9). He denounced many of their followers for obvious wickedness, including robbing the poor and committing whoredoms. Then he referred to another group, an exceptional few who were the humble followers of Christ. Note the words he used to describe these two groups: "They have all gone astray save it be a few, who are the humble followers of Christ; nevertheless, they are led, that in many instances they do err because they are taught by the precepts of men" (2 Ne. 28:14). Here we see that in many instances when humble followers of Christ are led astray by the precepts of men, their offense is error, not transgression.

Elder George A. Smith applied that principle in an [page 65] address delivered in the Tabernacle in Salt Lake City in 1870. Referring to honest persons in the Christian world at the time of the Restoration who had been led astray as to doctrine, he used the word error and indicated that the Lord would be very merciful to them.

"There were, however, honest persons in all of the denominations, and God has respect to every man who is honest of heart and purpose, though he may be deceived, and in error as to principle and doctrine; yet so far as that error is the result of their being deceived by the cunning craftiness of men, or of circumstances over which such have no control, the Lord in His abundant mercy looks with allowance thereon, and in His great economy He has provided different glories and ordained that all persons shall be judged according to the knowledge they possess and the use they make of that knowledge, and according to the deeds done in the body, whether good or evil" (in Journal of Discourses, 13:346).

Elder Smith's explanation obviously relied on the doctrine that defines the degree of responsibility of persons who have not received the law. The Apostle Paul taught that we commit sin only if, knowing the law, we disobey it (see Rom. 7:7). In a clear elaboration of that principle, the prophet Jacob affirms that "where there is no law given … there is no condemnation" (2 Ne. 9:25). As a result, he taught that "the atonement satisfieth the demands of his justice upon all those who have not the law given to them" (2 Ne. 9:26; see also Alma 42:17). Similarly, the prophet Mormon declared that "all little children are alive in Christ, and also all they that are without the law. For the power of redemption cometh on all them that have no law" (Moro. 8:22). This is the principle another Book of Mormon prophet applied in teaching the wicked Nephites that unless they would repent, it would be better for the Lamanites than for them. "For behold, they are more righteous than you, for they have not sinned against that great knowledge which ye have received; therefore the Lord will be merciful unto them; … even when thou shalt be utterly destroyed except thou shalt repent" (Hel. 7:24).

Under this doctrine, persons who break a law that has not been given to them are not accountable for sins. Of course, all men have been given the Spirit of Christ (conscience) that they may "know good from evil" (2 Ne. 2:5; Moro. 7:16). This makes us all aware of the wrongfulness of certain conduct, such as taking a life or stealing, but it does not make men accountable for laws that need to be specifically taught, like the knowledge that had been received by the Nephites but not by the Lamanites (see Hel. 7:24). Persons who break those kinds of laws when they have not received them are guilty of mistakes that should be corrected, but they are not accountable for sins. They may suffer for their mistakes, like a smoker suffers for breaking a law of health even if he has never heard of the Word of Wisdom. There are inherent penalties in errors or mistakes, but their perpetrators should not be branded as sinners.
 

The Need to Teach Children Correct Principles

We understand from our doctrine that before the age of accountability a child is "not capable of committing sin" (Moro. 8:8). During that time, children can commit mistakes, even very serious and damaging ones that must be corrected, but their acts are not accounted as sins.
 

Even after children reach the age of accountability, before we parents chasten them as sinners for committing a wrongful action, we should ask ourselves whether we have taught them the wrongfulness of that conduct. Have we taught them the commandments of God on that matter? This is a profound challenge and lesson for us. Perhaps this is the underlying principle for the Lord's solemn declaration that "inasmuch as parents have children in Zion, or in any of her stakes which are organized, that teach them not to understand the doctrine of repentance, faith in Christ the Son of the living God, and of baptism and the gift of the Holy Ghost by the laying on of the hands, when eight years old, the sin be upon the heads of the parents" (D&C 68:25).

The application of the commandments is sometimes difficult for children to understand. As parents, we know that we must be constantly teaching our children how to apply the commandments to the varying circumstances of our lives. For example, without explicit teaching they may not understand that stealing services from a long-distance telephone company is just as much a violation of the eighth commandment as stealing inventory from a retail merchant. In some of these teaching efforts, on matters that are genuinely in doubt, parents may need to treat an uninformed or untaught act as the equivalent of a mistake rather than a sin. We should correct the youthful offenders and promptly teach them correct principles to guide their future actions. Any repetition would then be a transgression.

This redemptive procedure also applies in the definition of the adult transgression of apostasy for teaching false doctrine. Knowing that there may be genuine questions about what is false doctrine, the servants of the Lord have specified a procedure for protecting a member who strays over the line innocently. This kind of apostasy is defined as "persist[ing] in teaching as Church doctrine information that is not Church doctrine after being corrected by their bishops or higher authority" (General Handbook of Instructions, [1989], sec. 10, p. 3). In other words, the teaching of false doctrine may be classified as a mistake the first time it happens, but it becomes a sin and a subject for Church discipline after those in authority clarify the application of the law to what the member is teaching.

Even though they have taught their children all of the commandments and principles they need for righteous and provident living, parents are still susceptible to the serious error of failing to distinguish between mistakes and sins. If well-meaning parents call teenagers to repentance for teenagers' numerous mistakes, they may dilute the effect of chastisement and reduce the impact of repentance for the category of teenage sins that really require it.
 

Relationship of Sins and Mistakes

Sometimes it is not easy to tell the difference between a mistake and a sin. The boundary can be uncertain. Take the matter of the beautiful flowering crab tree in our front yard. One spring when the limbs of this tree were getting too long, I pruned them, quite severely. June, my wife, evaluated my pruning and told me she thought it was a sin. I thought the extent of my pruning was a mistake at worst. I was willing to be corrected, but I did not feel I was needful of chastening and repentance.

My experience with overpruning our flowering tree leads to the observation that there is a large category of undesirable conduct that is surely an error or mistake and at an extreme level can cross over the border into transgression. When we willfully pass up an opportunity to progress toward eternal life, this is surely a mistake that should be corrected. In one way of looking at things, it is also a sin. This would apply to such things as failing to get schooling to prepare us for life, wasting our time, or failing to maintain the good grooming or to acquire the social or communication skills that would help us obtain employment or favorable consideration for marriage.

Mistakes can also lead to sins. The Prophet Joseph Smith observed that "there are so many fools in the world for the devil to operate upon, it gives him the advantage oftentimes" (Teachings, 331).

The violation of special limits like curfews or missionary rules can make one vulnerable to sin. Or, a mistake committed by one person can lead another person into sin in attempting to correct it. The pruning of the flowering crab tree, and countless other mistakes that are the subject of communications between husbands and wives and among parents and children, can be mishandled to the point of producing the wrathful, angry behavior the scriptures call contention. Contention is always a transgression. This was the subject of the Apostle Paul's warning to the parents in Ephesus: "Provoke not your children to wrath: but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord" (Eph. 6:4). The Apostle James reminds us that "the wrath of man worketh not the righteousness of God" (James 1:20). We must be careful how we point out and correct mistakes in others, lest efforts to correct a small-sized mistake become an overreaction that produces a large transgression in us or in those we are attempting to help.

We should not conclude that a sin is always more serious than a mistake. Almost all sins, large and small, can be corrected through repentance, but some serious mistakes (like stepping in front of a speeding automobile) can be irreversible. This shows that a big mistake may have more serious, permanent effects than a small transgression. To cite an example more benign than a pedestrian fatality, it is a sin to be insulting or unkind to anyone, but to be insulting or unkind to your boss is also a big mistake. In this case, repentance for unkindness may be easier than finding a new job because of insubordination.

The Prophet Joseph Smith identified another kind of error whose consequences may be more serious than some sins. He said that ignorance of the nature of evil spirits had caused many, including some members of the restored Church, to err in following false prophets and prophetesses. In an editorial in the Times and Seasons, the Prophet observed that "nothing is a greater injury to the children of men than to be under the influence of a false spirit when they think they have the Spirit of God" (History of the Church, 4:573). By this account, persons innocently misled by false spirits are guilty of error and can be [page 67] readily welcomed back into the fold when their error has been made known and acknowledged. That very redemptive teaching rests on the scriptural distinction between errors and transgressions.

Another thing about the relationship of sins and mistakes is that they often go together. Sometimes the same act can be an error or a sin according to what is in the mind of the actor. Something like an automobile collision that does great harm to another can be an error if it was unintended or a transgression if it was intended. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. highlighted the distinction between an unintended act and an intended one in his famous observation that "even a dog distinguishes between being stumbled over and being kicked" (The Common Law [1963], 7).
 

Avoiding and Correcting Sins and Mistakes

We should always seek to distinguish between sins and mistakes in our own behavior and in the conduct of others. When we do so, the scriptures direct us to the proper corrective.

Sins result from willful disobedience of laws we have received by explicit teaching or by the Spirit of Christ, which teaches every man the general principles of right and wrong. For sins, the remedy is to chasten and encourage repentance.

Mistakes result from ignorance of the laws of God or the workings of the universe or people he has created. For mistakes, the remedy is to correct the mistake, not to condemn the individual.

We must make every effort to avoid sin and to repent when we fall short. Through the Atonement of Jesus Christ we can be forgiven of our sins through repentance and baptism and by earnestly striving to keep the commandments of God. Being cleansed from sin, receiving forgiveness, and being reconciled with God through the Atonement of Christ is the means by which we can achieve our divine destiny as children of God.

We should seek to avoid mistakes, since some mistakes have very painful consequences. But we do not seek to avoid mistakes at all costs. Mistakes are inevitable in the process of growth in mortality. To avoid all possibility of error is to avoid all possibility of growth. In the parable of the talents, the Savior told of a servant who was so anxious to minimize the risk of loss through a mistaken investment that he hid up his talent and did nothing with it. That servant was condemned by his master (see Matt. 25:24-30).

If we are willing to be corrected for our mistakes--and that is a big if, since many who are mistake-prone are also correction-resistant--innocent mistakes can be a source of growth and progress.

We may suffer adversities and afflictions from our own mistakes or from the mistakes of others, but in this we have a comforting promise. The Lord, who suffered for the pains and afflictions of his people (see Alma 7:11; D&C 18:11; D&C 33:53), has assured us through his prophets that he will consecrate our afflictions for our gain (see 2 Ne. 2:2; D&C 98:3). We can learn by experience, even from our innocent and inevitable mistakes, and our Savior will help us carry the burden of the afflictions that are inevitable in mortality. What he asks of us is to keep his commandments, to repent when we fall short, and to help and love one another as he has loved us (see John 13:34).

 

Bruce will discuss in detail the Law of Consecration, the PEF fund is part of us living the law.  Be generous with the blessings we receive.  Our personal ministry, how are you doing?

 

 

D&C 1:30-35 – The Lord is pleased with the Church, but individuals need to continue to improve.  The Lord of Host = Lord of an army (Sabaoth, D&C 87), President Benson said verse 35 has happened.

 

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 1:30-35.)

 

30 And also those to whom these commandments were given, might have power to lay the foundation of this church, and to bring it forth out of obscurity and out of darkness, the only true and living church upon the face of the whole earth, with which I, the Lord, am well pleased, speaking unto the church collectively and not individually—

 

31 For I the Lord cannot look upon sin with the least degree of allowance;

 

32 Nevertheless, he that repents and does the commandments of the Lord shall be forgiven;

 

33 And he that repents not, from him shall be taken even the light which he has received; for my Spirit shall not always strive with man, saith the Lord of Hosts.

 

34 And again, verily I say unto you, O inhabitants of the earth: I the Lord am willing to make these things known unto all flesh;

 

35 For I am no respecter of persons, and will that all men shall know that the day speedily cometh; the hour is not yet, but is nigh at hand, when peace shall be taken from the earth, and the devil shall have power over his own dominion.

 

There was a question on the 144,000, Bruce read D&C 77:11 and said it was a symbolic number representing a very large number of priesthood holders, who had their temple covenants, High Priests. 

 

Must Every Person Living on Earth Hear the Gospel Before the Lord Can Come?

 

In November 1831 the early elders of the Church were authorized to preach the gospel: "Go ye into all the world, preach the gospel to every creature, acting in the authority which I have given you, baptizing in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost" (D&C 68:8). "For, verily, the sound must go forth from this place into all the world, and unto the uttermost parts of the earth—the gospel must be preached unto every creature, with signs following them that believe" (D&C 58:64). It is true that every person must have the opportunity to hear the gospel, either here or hereafter. Eventually "the truth of God will go forth boldly, nobly, and independent, till it has penetrated every continent, visited every clime, swept every country, and sounded in every ear, till the purposes of God shall be accomplished, and the Great Jehovah shall say the work is done." fn

 

Not all, however, will have that privilege as mortals, and not all will have that privilege before the Second Coming. Jesus had spoken to the Twelve about the last days as follows: "And again, this Gospel of the Kingdom shall be preached in all the world, for a witness unto all nations, and then shall the end come, or the destruction of the wicked" (Joseph Smith-Matthew 1:31). As we have seen, the great day of gathering—the day when millions upon millions will come into the true fold of God—is millennial. But there is more. Elder Bruce R. McConkie explained that before the Lord Jesus can return in glory, two things must take place: "The first . . . is that the restored gospel is to be preached in every nation and among every people and to those speaking every tongue. Now there is one immediate reaction to this: Can't we go on the radio and preach the gospel to . . . the nations of the earth? We certainly can, but that would have very little bearing on the real meaning of the revelation that says we must preach it to every nation, kindred, and people. The reason is the second thing that must occur before the Second Coming: The revelations expressly, specifically, and pointedly say that when the Lord comes the second time to usher in the millennial era, he is going to find, in every nation, kindred, and tongue, and among every people, those who are kings and queens, who will live and reign a thousand years on earth (Revelation 5:9-10).

 

"That is a significant statement that puts in perspective the preaching of the gospel to the world. Yes, we can go on the radio; we can proclaim the gospel to all nations by television or other modern invention. And to the extent that we can do it, so be it, it's all to the good. But that's not what is involved. What is involved is that the elders of Israel, holding the priesthood, in person have to trod the soil, eat in the homes of the people, figuratively put their arms around the honest in heart, feed them the gospel, and baptize them and confer the Holy Ghost upon them. Then these people have to progress and advance, and grow in the things of the Spirit, until they can go to the house of the Lord, until they can enter a temple of God and receive the blessings of the priesthood, out of which come the rewards of being kings and priests.

 

"The way we become kings and priests is through the ordinances of the house of the Lord. It is through celestial marriage; it is through the guarantees of eternal life and eternal increase that are reserved for the Saints in the temples. The promise is that when the Lord comes he is going to find in every nation and kindred, among every people speaking every tongue, those who will, at that hour of his coming, have already become kings and priests. . . . All this is to precede the Second Coming of the Son of Man." fn

 

The revelations declare: "Prepare ye the way of the Lord, and make his paths straight, for the hour of his coming is nigh—when the Lamb shall stand upon Mount Zion, and with him a hundred and forty-four thousand, having his father's name written on their foreheads" (D&C 133:17-18). This group of 144,000 are high priests after the holy order of God, men who have themselves received the promise of exaltation and godhood and whose mission it is to bring as many as will come into the Church of the Firstborn, into that inner circle of men and women who have passed the tests of mortality and have become the elect of God. fn I have often thought that the 144,000 high priests called in the last days to bring men and women into the Church of the Firstborn (see D&C 77:11) is a symbolic reference: in that day of division, of unspeakable wickedness and consummate righteousness, temples will dot the earth, be accessible to the Lord's covenant people everywhere, and thus the fulness of those temple blessings will be sealed upon millions of the faithful Saints worldwide by those holding those transcendent powers.

 

 

(Leon R. Hartshorn, Dennis A. Wright, and Craig J. Ostler, eds., The Doctrine and Covenants, a Book of Answers: The 25th Annual Sidney B. Sperry Symposium [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1996], 224.)

 

We also had a good discussion on the Church of the Firstborn, D&C 76:53, “overcome by faith = temple ordinances.

 

Strait = Church on earth >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Narrow = Church of the Firstborn in Heaven.

 

Elder Delbert L. Stapley gave the definition of Strait and Narrow in a Conference talk, April, 1955

The Church of the Firstborn

Bruce Satterfield
Department of Religious Education,
Brigham Young University - Idaho

    Becoming part of the Church of the Firstborn should be the goal of every Latter-day Saint. Though the phrase "church of the Firstborn" is used in the scriptures (see Hebrews 12:23; D&C 76:54, 67, 71, 94, 102; 77:11; 78:21; 88:5; 93:22; 107:19), many in the Church are unfamiliar with its meaning. The following is an examination of the scriptures and the words of the brethren concerning the doctrine of the church of the Firstborn.

Three Kingdoms of Glory
    Just hours before the Savior performed the atoning sacrifice that ended in his death and resurrection, he told the Apostles, "In my Father's house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you" (John 14:2). The atonement made possible salvation for God's children in a one of several kingdoms prepared by the Savior. Brigham Young taught, "The kingdoms that God has prepared are innumerable. . . How may kingdoms there are has not been told to us" (Journal of Discourses 8:154).
    On February 16, 1832, the Lord gave to the Prophet Joseph Smith a series of visions revealing that the "many mansions" the Savior prepared for God's children are divided into three general categories: the celestial, terrestrial, and telestial kingdoms (see D&C 76).

Celestial Kingdom: The Place of the Church of the Firstborn
    In the same revelation, Joseph Smith was told what one must do to qualify for entrance into the celestial kingdom:

    They are they who received the testimony of Jesus, and believed on his name and were baptized after the manner of his burial, being buried in the water in his name, and this according to the commandment which he has given--
    That by keeping the commandments they might be washed and cleansed from all their sins, and receive the Holy Spirit by the laying on of the hands of him who is ordained and sealed unto this power;
    And who overcome by faith, and are sealed by the Holy Spirit of promise, which the Father sheds forth upon all those who are just and true. (D&C 76:51-53).

Of those who qualify to enter the celestial kingdom, the Lord declared: "They are they who are the church of the Firstborn" (D&C 76:54).

Highest Level of Celestial Kingdom is the Church of the Firstborn
    But the phrase "church of the Firstborn" does not have reference to the celestial kingdom in general. In May, 1843, twelve years after the vision of the celestial kingdom found in D&C 76, the Prophet taught, "In the celestial glory there are three heavens or degrees" (D&C 131:1). Joseph Fielding Smith taught that only those who achieve the highest level of the celestial kingdom or exaltation are of the Church of the Firstborn: "Those who gain exaltation in the celestial kingdom are those who are members of the Church of the Firstborn; in other words, those who keep all the commandments of the Lord. There will be many who are members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints who shall never become members of the Church of the Firstborn. (Doctrines of Salvation, 2:41; emphasis added). Again, he said: "Eternal life is life in the presence of the Father and the Son. Those who receive it become members of the 'Church of the Firstborn' and are heirs as sons and daughters of God. They receive the fulness of blessings. They become like the Father and the Son and are joint-heirs with Jesus Christ" (Doctrines of Salvation, 2:9).
    Therefore, only those have been exalted are members of the Church of the Firstborn. Bruce R. McConkie taught: "as The Church of Jesus Christ is [God's] earthly church, so The Church of the Firstborn is [God's] heavenly church, albeit its members are limited to exalted beings, for whom the family unit continues and who gain an inheritance in the highest heaven of the celestial world" (The Promised Messiah, p.47).

Temple Ordinances Necessary to Enter Church of Firstborn
    The sacred ordinances performed in the temple are essential in becoming a member of the Church of the Firstborn. This was made clear by Joseph Smith. On May 4, 1842, the day the Prophet introduced the temple ordinances of the washing and anointing and the endowment in this dispensation, he wrote:

I spent the day in the upper part of the store . . . in council with General James Adams, of Springfield, Patriarch Hyrum Smith, Bishops Newel K. Whitney and George Miller, and President Brigham Young and Elders Heber C. Kimball and Willard Richards, instructing them in the principles and order of the Priesthood, attending to washings, anointings, endowments and the communication of keys pertaining to the Aaronic Priesthood, and so on to the highest order of the Melchizedek Priesthood, setting forth the order pertaining to the Ancient of Days, and all those plans and principles by which any one is enabled to secure the fullness of those blessing which have been prepared for the Church of the Firstborn, and come up and abide in the presence of the Eloheim in the eternal worlds. (History of the Church 5:1-2; Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p.237; emphasis added)

In line with this, Brigham Young who was in attendance on this occasion later stated: "The ordinances of the house of God are expressly for the Church of the Firstborn" (Discourses of Brigham Young, p.397; and Journal of Discourse, 8:154).
    Though D&C 76:51-53 (quoted earlier) does not specifically state that temple ordinances are necessary for entrance into the Church of the Firstborn, it is, however, implied in verse 53 which states that one of the prerequisites for those who qualify for the celestial kingdom are those "who overcome by faith." In 1835, Joseph Smith taught the Quorum of the Twelve that temple ordinances were a necessary part of overcoming all things: "You need an endowment, brethren, in order that you may be prepared and able to overcome all things" (History of the Church, 2:309; Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p.91).


    Joseph Fielding Smith taught necessity of temple ordinances to become a member of the Church of the Firstborn in these terms:

The higher ordinances in the temple of God pertain to exaltation in the celestial kingdom. . . . In order to receive this blessing, one must keep the full law, must abide the law by which that kingdom is governed; for, "He who is not able to abide the law of a celestial kingdom cannot abide a celestial glory." So being ordained an elder, or a high priest, or an apostle, or even President of the Church, is not the thing that brings the exaltation, but obedience to the laws and the ordinances and the covenants required of those who desire to become members of the Church of the Firstborn, as these are administered in the house of the Lord.

He then stated:

To become a member of the Church of the Firstborn, as I understand it, is to become one of the inner circle. We are all members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints by being baptized and confirmed, and there are many who seem to be content to remain such without obtaining the privileges of exaltation, (Doctrines of Salvation, 2:42).

Again, on another occasion, he wrote:

Each person baptized into the Church is under obligation to keep the commandments of the Lord. He is under covenant, for baptism is a "new and an everlasting covenant." (D.C. 22:1.) When he has proved himself by a worthy life, having been faithful in all things required of him, then it is his privilege to receive other covenants and to take upon himself other obligations which will make of him an heir, and he will become a member of the "Church of the Firstborn." (The Way to Perfection, p.208)

Finally, he taught:

The Lord has made it possible for us to become members of the Church of the Firstborn, by receiving the blessings of the house of the Lord and overcoming all things. Thus we become heirs, "priests and kings, who have received of his fulness, and of his glory," who shall "dwell in the presence of God and his Christ forever and ever," with full exaltation. Are such blessings worth having? (Doctrines of Salvation, 2:42-43)

Likewise, Bruce R. McConkie testified: "The temple ordinances open the door to gaining all power and all wisdom and all knowledge. Temple ordinances open up the way to membership in the Church of the Firstborn" (Conference Report, October 1955, p.13).

Temple Marriage Gate into Church of the Firstborn
    The temple ordinances of washing and anointing, endowment, and sealings are not isolated ordinances but are interrelated. The marriage ordinance is the culmination of all ordinances of the priesthood. Elder Boyd K. Packer has noted that all other ordinances of salvation "were preliminary and preparatory to your coming to the altar to be sealed as husband and wife for time and for all eternity (The Holy Temple, p. 69). As the culminating ordinance, temple marriage is gate into the highest level of the celestial kingdom and thus the gate into the Church of the Firstborn. Bruce R. McConkie has written:

The Church of the Firstborn is the church among exalted beings in the highest heaven of the celestial world. It is the church among those for whom the family unit continues in eternity. In a sense it is the inner circle within the Lord's church on earth. It is composed of those who have entered into that patriarchal order which is called the new and everlasting covenant of marriage. As baptism admits repentant souls to membership in the earthly church, so celestial marriage opens the door to membership in the heavenly church. (A New Witness for the Articles of Faith, p.337)

On an earlier occasion, he stated:

We believe something more, as several of these brethren have said during this conference: that neither is the man without the woman nor the woman without the man in the Lord, but that the gate to exaltation and the fullness of eternal life in the kingdom of the Father is the new and everlasting covenant of marriage; and just as men may enter in at the gate of repentance and baptism, and work out for themselves a salvation hereafter by faith and diligence, so they may enter in at the gate of celestial marriage, and, conditioned upon keeping that covenant, come up in the resurrection as husband and wife, the family unit continuing through all eternity, and thus, eventually -- as members of the family of God, members of the Church of the Firstborn -- become joint heirs with Jesus Christ, and receive, inherit, and possess all things. (Conference Report, October 1954, p.125)

The Earthly Church Prepares People for Church of Firstborn
    The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints exists to prepare God's children to enter the Church of the Firstborn. Elder McConkie wrote: "The purpose of the church on earth is to prepare us for an inheritance in the church in heaven" (A New Witness for the Articles of Faith, p.337).
    Hence the Lord stated that those who are ordained to the priesthood in the last days are "ordained unto the holy order of God, to administer the everlasting gospel; for they are they who are ordained out of every nation, kindred, tongue, and people, by the angels to whom is given power over the nations of the earth, to bring as many as will come to the church of the Firstborn" (D&C 77:11; emphasis added).

Blessings of the Church of the Firstborn
    Joseph Smith declared the blessings of those who enter the Church of the Firstborn in these words: "They who dwell in his presence are the church of the Firstborn; and they see as they are seen, and know as they are known, having received of his fulness and of his grace; And he makes them equal in power, and in might, and in dominion" (D&C 76:94-95). In other words, those who receive the highest level of the celestial kingdom become as God, exalted beings who are equal in power, might, and dominion with the Father. To them "the Father has given all things" even of "his fulness, and of his glory" (D&C 76:55-56). They "inherit thrones, kingdoms, principalities, and powers, dominions, all heights and depths" (D&C 132:19).
    Thus they become gods themselves. Having been made equal with God's power, dominion, and authority, they do the work of gods: "to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life" of their own offspring.

Communication With Church of the Firstborn
    It is the privilege of those who have received temple ordinances and have been faithful in the covenants made therein to be able to communicate with the Church of the Firstborn. Concerning this, the Lord has said: "The power and authority of the higher, or Melchizedek Priesthood, is to hold the keys of all the spiritual blessings of the church--To have the privilege of receiving the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, to have the heavens opened unto them, to commune with the general assembly and church of the Firstborn, and to enjoy the communion and presence of God the Father, and Jesus the mediator of the new covenant" (D&C 107:18-19; emphasis added).
    How and when does this communication take place? This is one of the privileges of those who make their calling and election sure (though it is possible that certain circumstances may require that this communication take place prior to one's calling and election is made sure- see Parley P. Pratt's talk given at the laying of the cornerstones of the Salt Lake Temple on April 6, 1853 in Journal of Discourses, 2:43-47). In June of 1839, Joseph Smith taught the Church:

    After a person has faith in Christ, repents of his sins, and is baptized for the remission of his sins and receives the Holy Ghost, (by the laying on of hands), which is the first Comforter, then let him continue to humble himself before God, hungering and thirsting after righteousness, and living by every word of God, and the Lord will soon say unto him, Son, thou shalt be exalted.
    When the Lord has thoroughly proved him, and finds that the man is determined to serve Him at all hazards, then the man will find his calling and his election made sure, then it will be his privilege to receive the other Comforter . . .

He then stated:

    Now what is this other Comforter? It is no more nor less than the Lord Jesus Christ Himself; and this is the sum and substance of the whole matter; that when any man obtains this last Comforter, he will have the personage of Jesus Christ to attend him, or appear unto him from time to time, and even He will manifest the Father unto him, and they will take up their abode with him, and the visions of the heavens will be opened unto him, and the Lord will teach him face to face, and he may have a perfect knowledge of the mysteries of the Kingdom of God; and this is the state and place the ancient Saints arrived at when they had such glorious visions -- Isaiah, Ezekiel, John upon the Isle of Patmos, St. Paul in the three heavens, and all the Saints who held communion with the general assembly and Church of the Firstborn. (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p.150).

    Such communication with the Church of the Firstborn is for personal edification and is not shared publically. Joseph Smith spoke of certain Biblical saints who had communicated with the "general assembly and church of the firstborn" (see Hebrews 12:22-23). He asked: "What did they learn by coming to the spirits of just men made perfect? Is it written? No. What they learned has not been and could not have been written" (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p.325)

 

After the King Follett discourse, the Prophet gave a sermon on the gathering and the critical importance of building a temple and receiving the temple ordinances.  A temple was built in Kirtland, but not begun in Missouri.

 

Joseph never lived in Missouri, except for a few months; most of his time there was spent in Liberty Jail!  His mission was to gather, missionary work.  Because of opposition in Kirtland, he moved to Hiram and worked diligently on the Inspired Version of the Bible.  The point is this:  Joseph asked questions and the Lord responded, like D&C 76.  Joseph had to write down what he saw, maybe someone else would have written it differently, but they didn’t have the vision, he did!!

 

MISSOURI EXPERIENCE

 

    1. 1831-1833 – Jackson County
    2. 1834-1836 – Exile to the Northern Counties
    3. 1837-1838 – Far West

 

D&C 101 – Joseph didn’t know of the difficulties in Missouri, he heard only one side of the story; the saints caused some of the problems themselves.  The Lord let Joseph know what was going on.

 

Maturing toward the Millennium

(D&C 101, 103-106)

 

RICHARD D. DRAPER

 

The Young and the Mature Church

 

The sections of the Doctrine and Covenants considered in this essay reveal two views of the latter-day Church. There is the 19th-century Church: small, weak, vulnerable, and immature. Then there is the future Church: very great, a sanctified body "fair as the sun, and clear as the moon, and . . . terrible unto all nations; [such] that the kingdoms of this world [are] constrained to acknowledge that the kingdom of Zion is in very deed the kingdom of our God and his Christ" (D&C 105:31-32).

 

At present, we are living in a Church of transition. It is no longer weak and vulnerable and yet it is not the glorious Church of the future. The task of the present is to bring into reality that future Church. Though this will be accomplished through missionary work, temple work, and service in wards and stakes, these are only means to an end. The most important factor and that to which all others move is the true conversion of the individual member of the Church. Only when enough hearts have given themselves to the Savior can the Church of the future become a reality. Until then we will remain a Church in transition.

 

The Glory of Zion

 

One of the most important tasks of the present Church is to prepare the hearts of its people to dwell in the Millennium. The Church will do this by first preparing them "to receive the glory that [the Lord has] for them, even the glory of Zion" (D&C 136:31). Zion is a forerunner to the Millennium. Once the Church members can live the law of Zion they will be able to enjoy her glory and dwell on the sanctified earth, the world-wide expansion of Zion, during the thousand years of its Sabbath. This is because Zion will be built upon the principles of the law of the celestial kingdom. Therefore, the Lord can say of her: "There shall be mine abode, and it shall be Zion, which shall come forth out of all the creations which I have made" (Moses 7:64).

 

The reason Zion is the abode of God is because she is governed by the laws of the celestial kingdom (D&C 88:28, 29; 105:5. For this reason she endures forever: "And thou hast taken Zion to thine own bosom, from all thy creations, from all eternity to all eternity" (Moses 7:31). Joseph Smith stated:

 

The building up of Zion is a cause that has interested the people of God in every age; it is a theme upon which prophets, priests and kings have dwelt with peculiar delight; they have looked forward with joyful anticipation to the day in which we live; and fired with heavenly and joyful anticipations they have sung and written and prophesied of this our day, . . . [which] God and angels have contemplated with delight for generations past; that fired the souls of the ancient patriarchs and prophets; a work that is destined to bring about the destruction of the powers of darkness, the renovation of the earth, the glory of God, and the salvation of the human family. fn

 

Zion Is Lost

 

Joseph was one of those prophets whose souls were fired by the vision of Zion. Of this the Lord said in 1830: "Him have I inspired to move the cause of Zion in mighty power for good, and his diligence I know, and his prayers I have heard. Yea, his weeping for Zion I have seen, and I will cause that he shall mourn for her no longer" (D&C 21:7-8). Shortly after this Joseph received authority to bring Zion into reality, and the process began. fn

 

This grand end, however, was never realized during the Prophet's lifetime. Joseph Smith and the Lord were willing, but the Saints were unprepared: "There were jarrings, and contentions, and envyings, and strifes, and lustful and covetous desires among them; therefore, by these things they polluted their inheritances," the Lord said (D&C 101:6). The consequence was that the land of Zion became lost for a time as a possession for the people of God. This loss was due primarily to mob action taken against those Saints living in Missouri; within four years the Saints had lost all their holdings in that State.

 

Though the Lord had something to say about those who abused and drove out the Saints, he did not allow the Saints to forget that the greater responsibility for failure was theirs. He said, "They were found transgressors, therefore they must needs be chastened" (D&C 101:41). This would be "a sore and grievous chastisement, because they did not hearken altogether unto the precepts and commandments which I gave unto them" (D&C 103:4). The result was made clear by the Lord: they would be "chastened until they learn obedience, if it must needs be, by the things which they suffer" (D&C 105:6).

 

Initially the suffering the Saints were to endure was not to include the giving up of their Missouri lands. When Oliver Cowdery, who was sent from Missouri in August 1833, reported the outrages which had been committed against the Saints there, the members at Kirtland "concluded with one accord to die with you or redeem you." fn This was no empty promise. Meetings were held to determine what the best course of action would be. In December a revelation was received (now section 101) in which a parable explained what the Saints were to do about the situation: "Go and gather together the residue of my servants, and take all the strength of mine house, which are my warriors, my young men, and they that are of middle age also among all my servants, . . . and go ye straightway unto the land of my vineyard and redeem my vineyard" (D&C 101:55-56).

 

In February 1834 the Prophet received another revelation directing that he organize the body of men referred to in the parable (D&C 103:22-26). The group of men who responded to Joseph Smith's call became known as Zion's Camp. The plan was for this body of armed men to work in concert with the state authorities and under state protection in restoring the Saints to their homes. To this end many men left families and farms and traveled over 1,000 miles. Their efforts, however, proved fruitless. The governor of Missouri, Daniel Dunklin, though he had given his promise, decided that he would not help the Saints. This meant that any action of the Saints was futile. In consequence of the concern created by these events, section 105 was given explaining why Zion would not be redeemed at that time, and specifying what the Saints would need to do to redeem it. fn

 

Though the expressed purpose of Zion's Camp was not realized, a greater purpose was. The Lord in his economy had more in mind than restoring people to real estate. Joseph Smith, not long after the return to Kirtland of Zion's Camp, explained the purpose of the Lord. He said:

 

Brethern, some of you are angry with me, because you did not fight in Missouri; but let me tell you, God did not want you to fight. He could not organize his kingdom with twelve men to open the gospel door to the nations of the earth, and with seventy men under their direction to follow in their tracks, unless he took them from a body of men who had offered their lives, and who had made as great a sacrifice as did Abraham.

 

Now, the Lord had got his Twelve and his Seventy, and there will be other quorums of Seventies called, who will make the sacrifice, and those who have not made their sacrifices and their offerings now, will make them hereafter. fn

 

Out of the attempt to redeem Zion came that power and organization which would redeem the world. The Lord's purposes were indeed met.

 

The Church Yet Loved

 

Though the land of Zion was lost temporarily and the Saints stood rightly condemned, it is important to note that the Saints were not cast off. Indeed the Lord told Joseph Smith: "They have been afflicted, in consequence of their transgressions; yet I will own them, and they shall be mine in the day when I shall come to make up my jewels" (D&C 101:2-3). Through disobedience they had brought troubles upon themselves, yet not the wrath of God. In his eyes they were yet to become his "jewels." This verse is a close parallel of the King James translation of Mall 3:17. A more literal translation of the Malachi passage would read: "And they will be mine, said Jehovah of hosts, in the day that I make up (my) treasured possession." The Hebrew word translated here as "treasured possession" designates valued property which is deliberately chosen and taken to oneself. fn The idea is one of a prized possession. Thus the Lord is here stating that his real treasure is not the riches of the earth, but rather the hearts and souls of his children.

 

How is it, then, that the early Saints could have committed transgressions and yet still be favored by the Lord? In D&C 29:47 the Lord spoke of a time when children begin to become accountable before him. The word "begin" used in that verse may suggest that children do not become accountable all at once but rather grow in accountability. This idea seems to apply to the Church as well. The Lord is more tolerant with the mistakes of youth than the rebellion of the mature. Though the Church had to suffer the consequences of transgression, still it was not cut off from the influence of the Lord. Time was given for maturation and experience before perfection was demanded.

 

The early Church, even with its mistakes, was still the infant from which the spiritual giant would eventually grow. For all its weakness, though it lost the land of Zion, it did not lose the capacity to realize its prophetic future and that which it would bring: the Millennium.

 

The Millennial Day

 

In section 101 the Lord speaks of the millennial day being ushered in by the revelation of his glory. This is to be sudden and, for the most part, unexpected. It is a complete break in history such that its flow is totally interrupted and a new course of history is introduced. The new history begins on the basis of the world-shattering revelation given by the Savior as he introduces the new era.

 

The consequences of that revelation are noted briefly in section 101: all corruption will be consumed and the earth transformed so that the glory of the Lord can dwell upon it; enmity will cease between man and animal; Satan will not be able to tempt mankind; death as we know it will be done away, and revelations will abound (vv. 24-34).

 

All of the programs of the Church exist to assist men and women to be ready for and enjoy a future day of glory. But before that day can come there is much work to be done. Righteousness must increase. The Church must grow so that it "may become a great mountain and fill the whole earth; that thy church may come forth out of the wilderness of darkness, and shine forth fair as the moon, clear as the sun, and terrible as an army with banners; and be adorned as a bride for that day when thou shalt unveil the heavens, and cause the mountains to flow down at thy presence, and the valleys to be exalted, and the rough places made smooth; that thy glory may fill the earth" (D&C 109:72-74).

 

Though the earth will rest during the Millennium, there will be a flurry of activity by its inhabitants. Missionary work must continue among those inhabitants of the earth who, though righteous enough to dwell on the sanctified earth, have not accepted the fulness of the Gospel. fn Work for the righteous dead must be completed, including celestial marriages for those who died before they had this opportunity. fn However, this is not all. Men must in that marvelous day use the outpouring of revelation to sanctify themselves and their families, as well as to continue to subdue the earth. It must be remembered that the millennial state is not the final state of the earth, but rather a period of preparation for a yet greater state. For this reason it will be necessary to spend time raising families and preparing both the living and the dead for the fulness of glory which will be revealed from heaven when the millennial period has achieved its purpose.

 

But all this—missionary work, temple work, raising of families, putting to use the superior knowledge which will be available—is but a part of the work of the Millennium. The real work is that of Christ. It is during this period that he will perfect personally his assigned work so that he can present it to the Father pure, holy, and totally sanctified. Only than can that reconstitution take place so that there can be a new heaven and a new earth where celestial men and women can enjoy the fruits of the tree of life and eat the heavenly manna forever.

 

If the Church in its immaturity lost the land of Zion, it did not lose the more important keys of preparing the hearts of a people so that they could establish Zion wherever they might be. Surely the heart is more important than real estate, since it is the heart that sanctifies the land and not the land that sanctifies the heart. Therefore, the attempt to claim Zion, including the march of Zion's Camp, was not really futile. Out of it came those leaders who were tried and tested. Through that trial they preserved that faith in God through which purity of heart has come and out of which will come the peace and beauty of the millennial day.

 

Notes Maturing Toward the Millennium

 

1. TPJS, pp. 231-32.

 

2. See Richard D. Draper, "To Do the Will of the Lord," found herein.

 

3. Letter from Joseph Smith, 10 August 1833, as cited in Lyndon W. Cook, The Revelations of the Prophet Joseph Smith (Provo, Ut.: Seventy's Mission Bookstore, 1981), p. 205.

 

4. See Monte S. Nyman, "The Redemption of Zion," found herein.

 

5. As recalled in Joseph Young, Sen., History of the Organization of the Seventies (Salt Lake City: Deseret News Steam Printing Establishment, 1878), p. 14; see also HC 2:182, note.

 

6. Francis Brown, S. R. Driver, and Charles A. Briggs, eds., A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1953), s. v. segullah.

 

7. Joseph Fielding Smith, Doctrines of Salvation, comp. Bruce R. McConkie, 3 vols. (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1954-56), 1:86-87. Bruce R. McConkie, The Millennial Messiah (Sale Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1982), chapters 53, 54.

 

8. Smith, Doctrines of Salvation, 1:65.

 

 

(Robert L. Millet and Kent P. Jackson, eds., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 1: The Doctrine and Covenants [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1989], 388.)

 

D&C 57 – The Lord describes where Zion will be located.  Read the heading, Joseph wanted to know WHEN events were to happen.  Isaiah 2, establish Zion, build temples!

 

Isaiah 54 – The church will get much bigger, her STAKES will expand; they will cover the earth before the Lord comes.

 

Moroni 10:31 – The last of his 8 exhortations, Moroni is talking to us, who else could he talk to!

 

 

 

Moroni 9-10: Remember How
Merciful the Lord Hath Been

Bruce Satterfield
Department of Religious Education
Brigham Young University - Idaho

 

 

Come unto Christ and Be Perfected In Him

From the time that the Book of Mormon came forth, marking the restoration of the gospel of Jesus Christ including spiritual gifts, Satan has opposed the growth of the kingdom of God through the great and abominable church with its array of evil gifts (see 1 Nephi 14:10-17). Knowing this would happen, Moroni entreats his readers in these words: "I would exhort you that ye would come unto Christ, and lay hold upon every good gift, and touch not the evil gift, nor the unclean thing" (Moroni 10:30). Further, Moroni, paraphrasing the prophet Isaiah (see Isaiah 52), admonishes the saints of God in the latter days to "awake, and arise from the dust, O Jerusalem; yea, and put on thy beautiful garments, O daughter of Zion; and strengthen thy stakes and enlarge thy borders forever, that thou mayest no more be confounded, that the covenants of the Eternal Father which he hath made unto thee, O house of Israel, may be fulfilled (Moroni 10:31).

The phrase "awake, and arise from the dust" was first used by Lehi in the context of awaking from a spiritual sleep (see 2 Nephi 1:13-14, 21-23). Moroni uses the same phrase to exhort scattered Israel in the last days to awake from their spiritual sleep and hear the message of the restoration. Once awakened, Moroni urges Israel to "put on thy beautiful garments . . . and strengthen thy stakes and enlarge thy borders forever". The Lord uses similar language in a latter day revelation: "For Zion must increase in beauty, and in holiness; her borders must be enlarged; her stakes must be strengthened; yea, verily I say unto you, Zion must arise and put on her beautiful garments" (D&C 82:14).

Commenting on this verse, President Harold B. Lee said:

Zion, as used here, undoubtedly had reference to the Church. . . . To be worthy of such a sacred designation as Zion, the Church must think of itself as a bride adorned for her husband, as John the Revelator recorded when he saw in vision the Holy City where the righteous dwelled, adorned as a bride for the Lamb of God as her husband. Here is portrayed the relationship the Lord desires in his people in order to be acceptable to our Lord and Master even as a wife would adorn herself in beautiful garments for her husband.

The rule by which the people of God must live order to be worthy of acceptance in the sight of God is indicated by the text to which I have made reference. This people must increase in beauty before the world; have an inward loveliness which may be observed by mankind as a reflection in holiness and in those inherent qualities of sanctity. The borders of Zion, where the righteous and pure in heart may dwell, must now begin to be enlarged. The stakes of Zion must be strengthened. All this so that Zion may arise and shine by becoming increasingly diligent in carrying out the plan of salvation throughout the world. ["Strengthen the Stakes of Zion," Ensign (Jul 1973), 3.]

How can Zion "put on [her] beautiful garments" and "increase in beauty"? The answer can be found in the conclusion of Moroni's final exhortation:

Yea, come unto Christ, and be perfected in him, and deny yourselves of all ungodliness; and if ye shall deny yourselves of all ungodliness and love God with all your might, mind and strength, then is his grace sufficient for you, that by his grace ye may be perfect in Christ; and if by the grace of God ye are perfect in Christ, ye can in nowise deny the power of God. And again, if ye by the grace of God are perfect in Christ, and deny not his power, then are ye sanctified in Christ by the grace of God, through the shedding of the blood of Christ, which is in the covenant of the Father unto the remission of your sins, that ye become holy, without spot. (Moroni 10:32-33)

Zion will become beautiful in the sight of the Lord when she comes unto Christ and is perfected in him. The word perfect is defined in Webster's New World Dictionary as complete in all respects, having been brought to completion, flawless, and faultless. Only through Christ can men can become spiritually and physically complete, fully developed, flawless, and faultless. In other words, men must come unto Christ to put on their "beautiful garments."

Moroni encouraged his readers to "deny yourselves of all ungodliness." President Benson taught: "To deny oneself of all ungodliness is to come to Christ by ordinances and covenants to repent of any sins which prevent the Spirit of the Lord from taking precedence in our lives" [ "This is a Day of Sacrifice," Ensign (May 1979), 32]. Those who come unto Christ obtain his saving grace and "are perfect in Christ." In other words, because of their complete devotion to God's work and glory, they have become at-one with Christ. Through his atonement, their sins have been remitted and their weaknesses have been made strengths. Of these, the Lord has said: "These are they who are just men made perfect through Jesus the mediator of the new covenant, who wrought out this perfect atonement through the shedding of his own blood" (D&C 76:69). Those who have become "perfect in Christ" are "sanctified in Christ by the grace of God". To be sanctified is to be made free from the stain and effects of sin. Those in this condition are "holy, without spot" (Moroni 10:33). It is as if they never had committed sin. These are they who have put on their "beautiful garments" (Moroni 10:31; see also Isaiah 52:1).

Church Government begins in Kirtland and Missouri, The First Presidency, Bishopric, High Council; the Quorum of the 12 was not organized at this time.

 

 

 

 

Troubles in Missouri, Zion’s Camp

 

March 4, 2004

 

 

 

Bruce began with the temple complex in Independence, who owns the land, the future plans, etc

The Temple Lot (Hedrakite) church now owns the plot; see his web site for pictures of it, also HC 1:357-359. Their building is beautiful architecturally, the museum is worth seeing, and they have many artifacts from the time period of the Saints.

 

Some asked about the Mormon stories about Zelph, the destroyer on the waters, Bruce had very little to say about them, check their historical truth before teaching about it.

 

D&C 52 and 57 – See the heading for 57, the saints thought of Zion as a city, like the City of Enoch, the Lord had a far broader picture in mind, like the entire world!

 

D&C 57:4 – Jew=Lamanite    Gentile=American, verse 7, Edward Partridge was called as the Bishop and moved from Kirtland to Jackson Co.  He was over the temporal affairs of the Church.  The Prophet stayed in Kirtland.  Verses 15-16 tell the saints instruction is coming.

 

 Causes and Consequences: Conflict in Jackson County

 

Bruce A. Van Orden

 

Zion! The New Jerusalem! Both the Book of Mormon (Ether 13:2-3; 3 Ne. 20:22) and Joseph Smith's revelations (D&C 28:9; 29:7-9; 35:24; 42:9, 35-36, 62; 45:65-71; 52:2-3, 42) fired the Latter-day Saints with a zeal to know the time and place for the establishment of Zion. Hardly anything excited early Mormons more than the prospect of building the New Jerusalem in Jackson County, Missouri, in preparation for the second advent of the Lord Jesus Christ. The original inhabitants of Jackson County, however, violently derailed Latter-day Saint expectations a mere two years after they first arrived in the county. What were the causes and consequences of this irreconcilable conflict between the Mormons and Gentiles in Jackson County?

 

The Latter-day Saints' contact with Jackson County began with the call of the "Lamanite missionaries." In September 1830 Joseph Smith called Oliver Cowdery to head a mission to the displaced Indian tribes (or "Lamanites," the Book of Mormon term) west of the Missouri state border. In the revelation announcing the call, Oliver was told, "No man knoweth where the city Zion shall be built, but it shall be given hereafter. Behold, I say unto you that it shall be on the borders by the Lamanites" (D&C 28:9). Additional revelations called Peter Whitmer, Jr., Parley P. Pratt, and Ziba Peterson to accompany Elder Cowdery on that mission (D&C 30:5-6;  32:1). En route the missionaries converted over 100 exuberant millenarian Christians in northeastern Ohio. One convert, Frederick G. Williams, accompanied the missionaries to western Missouri in early 1831. Hampered by United States Indian agents and local clergy, these elders did not bring any Lamanites into the Church, but they baptized a few Caucasians in Independence, the rough-hewn and sometimes disorderly seat of Jackson County at the westernmost outpost of civilization in Missouri and the head of the Santa Fe Trail. Independence was only 12 miles from the demarcation separating state and Indian lands.

 

Ever since the establishment of the Church in April 1830, the Prophet Joseph Smith had looked forward both to identifying and building Zion in America. In June 1831, the Lord revealed to him that the time had come to embark on a journey to western Missouri (D&C 52:3-5). Additionally, 13 pairs of missionary elders were commanded to go two by two to Missouri and to preach and build up branches along the way (D&C 52:7-10, 22-36; 56:5). When an entire congregation, the Colesville Branch, was evicted from farm lands in Thompson, Ohio, they, too, were commanded to relocate in Missouri (D&C 54:7-8).

 

Joseph Smith took with him a company of Church leaders to Missouri: Sidney Rigdon, his chief assistant and scribe; Edward Partridge, Church bishop; A. Sidney Gilbert, shopkeeper and Church agent; William W. Phelps, newly converted prominent printer and journalist from New York State; and wealthy members Martin Harris and Joseph Coe. In late July they arrived in Independence and were greeted by Oliver Cowdery and the other missionaries to the Lamanites, who had long awaited them. Their reunion was "a glorious [one] and moistened with many tears."fn

 

W. W. Phelps, who later composed Joseph Smith's official history for this time period, wrote these observations:

 

Our reflections were great: coming as we had from a highly cultivated state of society in the east, and[sta[n]ding now upon the confines or western limits of the United States, and looking into the vast wilderness of those that sat in darkness, how natural it was to observe the degradation, leanness of intellect, ferocity and jealousy of a people that were nearly a century behind the times…and exclaim in the language of the prophets:-when will the wilderness blossom as the rose; when will Zion be built up in her glory, and where will thy Temple stand unto which all nations shall come in the last days?fn

 

Their heavenward petitions resulted in a revelation informing them, "Wherefore, this is the land of promise, and the place for the city of Zion…. The place which is now called Independence is the center place; and the spot for the temple is lying [a half mile] westward, upon a lot which is not far from the court-house" (D&C 57:2-3). Throughout late July and early August, these brethren dedicated the land for a gathering spot, explored Jackson County, made a description of it for Saints who would soon gather there, established the first settlement for the Colesville Branch in Kaw Township (now in Kansas City), dedicated the temple lot, and conducted a conference for all Saints who had already arrived in the county. Assigned to Church leadership in Missouri were Edward Partridge, bishop; A. Sidney Gilbert, financial agent; W. W. Phelps, printer and editor; and Oliver Cowdery, assistant printer and editor (D&C 57:7D&C 57:6-13). After Joseph Smith and Sidney Rigdon returned to Ohio, Bishop Partridge began buying land for the Saints' new inheritances.

 

Publication of the Book of CommandmentsHCThe Mormons who spent the winter of 1831-32 in Jackson County struggled to cut timber; to build ferries, bridges, mills, dams, homes, outbuildings, and fences; and to prepare some land for cultivation. Even though as many as ten families lived in each log cabin, Parley P. Pratt wrote, "There was a spirit of peace and union, and love and good will manifested in this little Church in the wilderness, the memory of which will be ever dear to my heart."fn To these early pioneers, it was not what Zion was, but what it could become, that buoyed them up and lifted sagging spirits.

 

Publication of the Book of CommandmentsHCEarly in 1832, using Church funds, Sidney Gilbert established a Church storehouse and W. W. Phelps a printing office. Proceeds from the store were applied to buying and developing more land. Phelps and Cowdery began publishing the religious monthly, The Evening and The Morning Star; the secular weekly, the Upper Missouri Advertiser; a compilation of Joseph Smith's revelations called the "Book of Commandments"; and a compilation of hymns. Joseph Smith and Sidney Rigdon visited the new Zion in April and May 1832. During that spring and summer, 300 to 400 more Saints arrived, received their inheritances from Bishop Partridge, and began developing the land. One of their number, Emily M. [Coburn], observed,

 

It was a strange sight indeed, to see four or five yoke of oxen turning up the rich soil. Fencing and other improvements went on in rapid succession. Cabins were built and prepared for families as fast as time, money and labor could accomplish the work; and our homes in this new country presented a prosperous appearance-almost equal to Paradise itself-and our peace and happiness, as we flattered ourselves, were not in a great degree deficient to that of our first parents in the garden of Eden, as no labor or painstaking was spared in the cultivation of flowers and shrubbery of a choice selection.fn An "Eden" it was indeed, for about this time Joseph Smith identified the land of Zion as the same place where the Garden of Eden once stood.fn

 

The Church leaders in Jackson County gave schools a high priority. In the fall of 1832, they set up schools in Kaw Township (called the Colesville School) in Independence near the temple lot, and on the Blue River. They also urged the Saints to observe the Lord's Day. Mostly they emphasized gathering to Zion. In The Evening and The Morning Star, W. W. Phelps reminded immigrating Saints that they were to bring membership recommends from the bishop in Ohio or from three elders. He also advised them not to gather without adequate preparation.

 

By November 1832 there were 810 Saints in Missouri. Up to this point Zion could easily absorb its immigrants into its five settlements: the village of Independence near the temple lot; a branch on the Blue River three miles to the west; the Whitmer Branch three miles farther west; the Colesville Branch in Kaw Township two miles south of the Whitmer Branch; and the Prairie Branch on the Missouri state border.fn Editorials in the Star reflected the Saints' optimism as they created these new settlements.

 

If the Mormons had been by themselves in western Missouri, perhaps they could have fulfilled their sacred objectives. But they were not the first Caucasian settlers in the region. Jackson County was created from the Osage Indian Reservation after the signing of the 1825 Indian treaty that opened this part of Missouri for settlement. In 1826 the state legislature named the new county in honor of General Andrew Jackson, who was elected United States president in 1828, one year after the county was opened to settlers. The original inhabitants gave the new county seat the name of Independence, and it immediately became the new starting point for the Santa Fe Trail. In another two decades this bustling village also became the head for the Oregon and California Trails.fn

 

Nearly all early settlers before the Mormons in Jackson County were transplanted southerners, most of them from Kentucky and Tennessee, since Missouri had been designated a "slave state" in the Compromise of 1820. Some settlers brought slaves with them, although there were no cotton or sugar crops in western Missouri to make slavery profitable. One historian has observed,

 

At the western gateway, the [Mormons] found men who were brave and adventuresome, though often the thriftless, illiterate, and antisocial mingled with more than a town's share of drunkards and other reprobates. This was the last place a man could get a sack of flour, a yoke of oxen, or repair a wagon wheel before entering on the adventurous trails. The floating population were mostly the Rocky Mountain fur traders, trappers, overland merchants, and teamsters; aristocratic bison hunters from Europe and the East; invalids seeking health in the dry atmosphere of New Mexico and the plains; and government agents. A small quota of professional men were found who wore ruffled shirts and swallowtail coats at this extreme frontier. The town became a marvel of push, thrift, and enterprise.fn

 

Tension existed between the Mormons and their transplanted southern neighbors almost from the moment they met each other. These were two different societies with widely diverse reasons for being in Jackson County.fn As it turned out, neither was willing to compromise in order to live peacefully side by side. What were the underlying causes of this conflict that gradually grew to violent proportions?

 

First, the marked cultural differences between the two groups set them apart. Most Saints hailed from New England and valued congregational Sabbath worship, education of their children, and refined personal decorum. These values clashed with the "rough and ready" Missourians, many of whom had come west precisely to avoid any community interference in their lives. There were no schools for their children. A missionary from the American Home Missionary Society sent to Jackson County before the arrival of the Mormons described Independence as "a godless place, filled with so many profane swearers…. The majority of the people make a mild profession of Christian religion, but it is mere words, not manifested in Christian living." He wrote of saloons, prostitutes, horse racing, cock fighting, "gouging," and other forms of violence. "Christian Sabbath observance here appears to be unknown. It is a day for merchandising, jollity, drinking, gambling, and general anti-Christian conduct."fn While this description may be partially slanted against the original settlers, obviously the conflict between them and the Mormons was intensified by rugged American individualism and lawless frontier ways characteristic of the times. Practically no social interaction took place between the two groups; hence no leveling of their respective peculiarities through intermarriage or longer association together could take place.

 

Second, the Missourians considered the Latter-day Saint religion to be both bizarre and threatening. The Saints had aggressively articulated their belief in revelation; in a living Prophet, Joseph Smith; in a new body of scripture, the Book of Mormon; in spiritual gifts, especially the gift of tongues; in the imminent advent of the millennium; in the importance of gathering and unity among the Saints; and in a robust claim that Jackson County was Zion, the land of their sacred inheritance granted them by God. Naturally, the local clergy felt threatened by the missionary activity of the Mormons.

 

On the other hand, Mormons didn't appreciate the Jackson County religious climate. Even in the beginning, the Lamanite missionaries considered the protestant clerics "scorpions."fn In The Evening and The Morning Star, W. W. Phelps referred to the Missourians as "Gentiles." Phelps' articles on prophecy and doctrine created further hard feelings between the two groups.

 

Third, some original settlers viewed the Latter-day Saints as economically exclusive, if not un-American, by their living on Church lands and trading entirely with the Church store or mechanical shops in conjunction with their living the law of consecration and stewardship. Others accused Mormon immigrants of pauperism when they were unable to receive a land inheritance because of diminished Church resources. Neither of these economic conditions augured well for harmonious relationships. LDS merchants and tradesmen successfully took over a portion of the lucrative Santa Fe Trail trade. Many old settlers feared that Mormons would soon possess their lands and businesses; some even sold out to them. This meant even fewer customers and potential financial ruin for the remaining Missourians.

 

To complicate matters, in the spring of 1833 a Missouri River flood destroyed the landing at Independence. The river's channel also shifted away from the community, so a new town with a better landing, Westport, had to be established farther upstream. Businessmen in Independence blamed the Mormons for this threatening situation. In exasperation, numerous old settlers sold their businesses, farms, and possessions to the Mormons and moved away, leaving local businessmen with fewer customers.fn

 

Fourth, the Missouri frontiersmen and the Latter-day Saints had completely different attitudes toward the Indians. The original settlers like most Americans, feared and hated Indians. This antipathy increased in the 1830s as the government began to resettle eastern tribes on lands just west of Independence. After the 1832 Black Hawk War, citizens of western Missouri petitioned Congress to establish a line of military posts for their protection. The first LDS missionaries and other Mormons came to this fragile atmosphere declaring the prophetic destiny of the Native Americans. The old settlers were afraid the Saints would band with Indians to help them conquer the area for their New Jerusalem. Protestant ministers also resented Latter-day Saint efforts to convert the Indians.

 

Fifth, the Mormons represented a political threat to the residents of Jackson County. By early summer 1833, some 1,200 Mormons had arrived in the county, which total represented over half as many as the "gentile" residents. Mormons had been streaming in by the scores each week, and it was boasted that thousands more were coming. Simple arithmetic attests that by 1834 or 1835, Latter-day Saints could have wrested political control from those who had established Jackson County and Independence.

 

A sixth dividing issue that triggered the eventual confrontation between Mormons and Missourians was Black slavery. The transplanted southerners in Jackson County held few slaves, but they prized their right to do so and abhorred abolitionism, a sentiment held by some New England Mormons. The Missourians believed the false rumor that the Saints were interfering with the settlers' slaves and were working for their freedom. The possibility of a Black rebellion was feared throughout the South at the time because of the 1831 Nat Turner slave uprising in Virginia that had resulted in the death of over 70 whites and 100 slaves.

 

It should also be acknowledged that disobedience and dissension among the Saints contributed to the problems in Jackson County. Latter-day revelations declare that if the Saints had been sufficiently righteous and humble, the Lord would have protected them against their enemies and that they would have remained to build Zion in the county despite their differences with the original settlers. The first months of 1833 saw numerous internal challenges to the Church in Missouri. Some members tried to circumvent the authority of the council of high priests who had been appointed to lead the Church in Missouri-Edward Partridge, A. Sidney Gilbert, W. W. Phelps, Oliver Cowdery, John Whitmer, David Whitmer, Isaac Morley, and John Corrill. Some tried to obtain inheritances through other means than the revealed laws. Many members, including some of the leaders, contentiously complained that the Prophet Joseph Smith had not moved to Zion. Additionally there were petty jealousies, covetousness, and general neglect in keeping the commandments. After all, this was still an infant church with few historical precedents to ponder upon and learn from. Despite these failings, the Missouri Saints genuinely sought to repent after the Lord chastised them through Joseph Smith. Let me note here that there never was gross wickedness among them.

 

Latter-day scripture in the Doctrine and Covenants affirms that righteous behavior is a requisite to establishing Zion in the Lord's way. Immediately following their expulsion from Jackson County, the Saints were described in a revelation: "Behold, I say unto you, there were jarrings, and contentions, and envyings, and strifes, and lustful and covetous desires among them: therefore by these things they polluted their inheritances" (D&C 101:6). Then a few months later in 1834 when Zions' Camp arrived in Missouri, the Lord revealed,

 

And Zion cannot be built up unless it is by the principles of the law of the celestial kingdom; otherwise I cannot receive her unto myself.

 

And my people must needs be chastened until they learn obedience, if it must needs be, by the things which they suffer….

 

Therefore, in consequence of the transgressions of my people, it is expedient in me that mine elders should wait for a little season for the redemption of Zion-

 

That they themselves may be prepared, and that my people may be taught more perfectly, and have experience, and know more perfectly concerning their duty, and the things which I require at their hands. (D&C 105:5-6, 9-10)

 

The fragile peace between Mormons and the gentile settlers came to an end in July 1833. Vandalism against the Saints first began in the spring of 1832, but open hostilities surfaced after an article entitled "Free People of Color" appeared in the July 1833 issue of The Evening and the Morning Star. The article actually cautioned Mormon missionaries about proselyting among slaves and among former slaves. Unfortunately, the local Missourians misinterpreted this advice to mean that W. W. Phelps was inviting free blacks to join the Mormons in Jackson County. Phelps responded with an "Extra" explaining that the Church had no intention to invite free blacks to Missouri, but his denials were to no avail.fn

 

On 20 July 400 or 500 disgruntled citizens met at the Independence courthouse, chose officers, and selected a committee to draft a document outlining their demands of the Mormons. The officers and committee members were some of the leading elected Jackson County citizens; even the state lieutenant governor, Independence resident Lilburn W. Boggs, attended meetings and encouraged the anti-Mormon activity.

 

The same day the committee approached Mormon leaders and demanded that the Saints leave Jackson County. However, the Mormons were resolved not to leave their consecrated lands. When negotiations proved fruitless, the committee returned to the courthouse, and those in meeting quickly turned into a mob and decided to destroy the nearby Mormon printing office and storehouse. They surrounded the "W. W. Phelps & Co." building, which also served as Phelps' family residence, threw the furniture into the street and garden, broke the press and hauled it away, scattered the type, and destroyed nearly all the unbound sheets of the Book of Commandments. Phelps and his family miraculously escaped into the country unharmed.

 

The mob then turned its attention to the Gilbert and Whitney Store. Only when Gilbert promised he would pack the goods in three days did the mob disperse. With loud cursings, the mob sought other leading elders of the Church. They took Bishop Edward Partridge from his home and dragged him, together with 27-year-old Charles Allen, to the public square, and demanded that they renounce the Book of Mormon or leave the county. The two refused to do either, so they endured the cruel indignity of tarring and feathering.fn

 

Three days later the mob reappeared with rifles, pistols, whips, and clubs in search of Church leaders, cursing and profaning as they went. They set fire to haystacks and grain fields and destroyed several homes, barns, and businesses. Six Church leaders-Edward Partridge, Isaac Morley, John Corrill, W. W. Phelps, John Whitmer, and Sidney Gilbert-seeing that all Mormon lives were in jeopardy, offered their own lives as a ransom.

 

Rejecting this offer, community leaders threatened every man, woman, and child with a whipping unless they consented to leave the county. Under duress, the brethren signed an agreement to leave Jackson County early in 1834.

 

Meanwhile, Oliver Cowdery dashed to Ohio as the Saints' representative to seek counsel from Joseph Smith.fn Missouri Church leaders immediately sought assistance from Governor Daniel Dunklin at Jefferson City. Joseph Smith told the Saints by letter to hold their ground, and the governor advised them to seek redress through the courts. They did both. They employed attorneys from Clay County, including the later distinguished Alexander Doniphan and David R. Atchison. Upon learning that the Mormons were seeking legal protection, Jackson County leaders mobilized a militia to drive them out.fn

 

The mobs were relentless. On 31 October 1833, they attacked the Whitmer Branch just west of the Big Blue River, demolishing houses, whipping the men, and terrorizing the women and children. This was followed throughout the first week in November by a web of attacks, beatings, and intrigues. Two Missourians and one Mormon were killed. The militia forced all Mormons to surrender their weapons and to leave the county; most chose to cross the Missouri River into Clay County. A number of marauders rode through the countryside harassing Mormon settlers as they struggled toward the river. At least two Mormon women lost their lives. The shores near the ferry were lined with refugees on both sides. Some were fortunate enough to escape with their household goods, but many lost everything.fn

 

The Jackson County mob continued to torment the few remaining Mormons until they all left the county. Early the next year, when the Missourians learned of the approach of the Mormon army, Zion's Camp, they burned the remaining houses belonging to the Saints in an attempt to discourage the exiles' return.

 

The Saints held out hope for a quick return to Jackson County, but all attempts to obtain government redress and protection, as well as justice through the courts, proved fruitless. In the meantime, they resided uneasily in large groups in Clay County from 1833-36, in Caldwell County from 1836-38, and in Carroll and Daviess Counties in 1838. Finally, the 1838 "Mormon War" caused the Saints to abandon Missouri as the Church headquarters. An 1841 revelation absolved the Saints of that generation from further responsibility to build the Zionic temple and establish the New Jerusalem (D&C 124:49).

 

Gradually, through missionary labors, the Church has returned to Jackson County, although not in any form as Church headquarters. Two stakes of Zion-the Independence Missouri Stake and the Kansas City Missouri Stake-are in the county, and the Church has a beautiful visitor’s center and sponsors a community-healing annual pageant in the summer. The once-tragic relationship between Mormons and Gentiles in Jackson County, Missouri, is now only a memory.

 

 1. Dean C. Jessee, ed., The Papers of Joseph Smith (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1989), 1:357; hereafter Papers. For verification that Phelps is the writer of this portion of the official history, see Dean C. Jessee, "The Writing of Joseph Smith's History," BYU Studies 11 (1971): 441.

 

2. Papers, 1:357.

 

3. Autobiography of Parley P. Pratt (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1966), 72.

 

4. Emily M. Austin, Mormonism; or, Life among the Mormons (Madison: 1882), 67.

 

6. Max H. Parkin, "A History of the Latter-day Saints in Clay County, Missouri, from 1833 to 1837," (PhD diss., Brigham Young University, 1976), 28-32.

 

7. Pearl Wilcox, The Latter Day Saints on the Missouri Frontier (Independence, MO: n.p., 1972), 18-19.

 

8. Ibid., 19.

 

9. Richard L. Bushman conducted the first thorough discussion of this subject in "Mormon Persecutions in Missouri, 1833," BYU Studies 1 (1960): 11-20. See also Warren L. Jennings, "Zion is Fled: The Expulsion of the Mormons from Jackson County, Missouri," (PhD diss., Univ of Florida, 1962); T. Edgar Lyon, "Independence, Missouri, and the Mormons, 1827-1833," BYU Studies 13 (1972): 10-19; Kenneth H. Winn, Exiles in a Land of Liberty (Chapel Hill, NC: Univ of North Carolina, 1989), 85-105.

 

10. As cited in Lyon, 15-16.

 

11. Papers, 1:355.

 

12. Lyon, 17-18.

 

13. History of The Church. ed. B. H. Roberts 7 vols. (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1957), 1:373-79; hereafter HC.

 

14. Ibid., 1:390-93.

 

15. Ibid.

 

17. Ibid., 426-38.

 

5. Church editor W. W. Phelps consistently wrote in the Star and in his early hymns about Adam, Enoch, the Garden of Eden, and Adam-ondi-Ahman. He likely would have picked up these subjects from conversations with Joseph Smith and the Prophet's revelations, which he printed in the Star. For example, "For in Adam-ondi-Ahman Zion rose where Eden was," appears in the hymn "Glorious Things Are Sung of Zion," presently found in Hymns (Salt Lake City: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 1985), #48. Brigham Young also reported that Joseph Smith told him "the garden of Eden was in Jackson Co Missouri." See Scott G. Kenney, ed. Wilford Woodruff's Journal. 9 vols. (Midvale, UT: Signature Books, 1983-85), 7:129.

 

16. Ibid., 1:423-25.

 

 

 (Arnold K. Garr and Clark V. Johnson, eds., Regional Studies in Latter-day Saint History: Missouri [Provo: Department of Church History and Doctrine, 1994], 337.)

 

 

D&C 107:20 – Printing was very important to the church then as it is now, “letter of the gospel” is under the Aaronic Priesthood, the temporal work of the church.

 

 

The Redemption of Zion

(D&C 57-62)

 

MONTE S. NYMAN

 

On 20 July 1831 the Prophet Joseph Smith asked three poignant questions of the Lord as he observed the degenerate conditions which existed in Missouri, in which he and other elders had recently arrived. These three questions were: "When will the wilderness blossom as a rose? When will Zion be built up in her glory, and where will thy Temple stand unto which all nations shall come in these last days?" fn All three of these questions are associated with the writings of Isaiah, the Old Testament prophet. He had prophesied that the desert would blossom as a rose (Isa. 35:1), he had foreseen the glory of the Lord upon Zion (Isa. 60:1-2), and he had foretold concerning the temple in the last days unto which all nations would flow (Isa. 2:2). It is reasonable to assume that Joseph had been reading the prophet Isaiah and was contemplating the fulfillment of these prophecies in these latter days.

 

The Lord revealed what is now section 57 as an answer to his apparently disappointed prophet. Although he did not directly answer all three questions, he did answer the last question directly and indirectly gave instructions which, as we will see, led to the answers to the first two questions. The Lord concluded with a promise to reveal further directions later.

 

Where Will Thy Temple Stand?

 

The place for the temple was designated in Independence, Missouri (D&C 57:3). On 2 August 1831, Sidney Rigdon, acting under the Prophet's direction, dedicated the area "for an inheritance for the Saints." The next day, Joseph Smith dedicated the site for the temple. fn These events reaffirmed an earlier revelation that Missouri was indeed a land consecrated to the Lord's chosen people (D&C 52:1-2). The Lord's instructions were to buy land and divide it among the incoming Saints, and to print materials to further the preaching of the gospel for the gathering of the people. This would lead to the eventual building of Zion.

 

On 1 August 1831, the Lord kept his promise to give further directions by revealing what is now designated as section 58. In this revelation, the first two questions asked by the Prophet were answered. The second question, "When will Zion be built up in her glory?" was answered first.

 

When Will Zion Be Built?

 

The wording of the revelation (section 58) seems to have been chosen very carefully, as, undoubtedly, is that of all revelations. It is emphasized here to illustrate that the Saints did not read the revelation as carefully as the Lord gave it. The Saints were first told that Zion was not to be built up at this time but would be built after they had experienced much tribulation. They were assured, however, that their eternal reward would be just as great as though they had built Zion. The Lord then referred to the future glory which was to come after much tribulation, which glory was beyond their comprehension. He then reaffirmed that tribulation was to come before the glory of Zion and cautioned them to consider carefully ("lay it to heart") what he had told them (D&C 58:2-5). Whether or not they comprehended this part of the revelation cannot be determined for sure, but it seems that the Saints anticipated that they would build Zion immediately.

 

Purposes for Going to Missouri

 

In the next part of the revelation, the Lord outlined the cause, or the purposes, for which he had at that time sent the Saints to Missouri. These purposes were introduced with the admonition for them to receive this stewardship (D&C 58:5), again implying that they would not build Zion. There are four basic purposes outlined by the Lord. The first was a test of obedience for those Saints. They had already been obedient to revelation in coming to Missouri. In a later revelation, the Lord revealed that all his people must be "tried even as Abraham" (D&C 101:14). The trial of Abraham was to receive with obedience all things by the revelation of the Lord (D&C 132:29). The trial of these Saints would come through their obedience to the other purposes which the Lord was now revealing to them concerning the land of Zion. They were to prepare their hearts so that they could bear testimony of what was to come—the building of Zion. One can bear testimony more assuredly when one has personal knowledge and experience upon which to base that testimony. These people would be so prepared, having been residents of the area. This was the second purpose for which the Lord had brought them to Missouri. The third purpose for their coming to Missouri was to lay the foundation for the city of the Zion of God. This was an honor that the Lord gave them, but it also enhanced their ability to bear testimony of the land. Their last purpose for being in Missouri was one which probably was not understood by the Saints then nor by many today. It was to prepare a feast for the poor.

 

As stated earlier, the Prophet Joseph may have been studying Isaiah's prophecies when he asked the questions leading to these revelations. After referring to the wording found in another prophecy of Isaiah which was linked with the establishment of Zion (Isa. 25:6), the Lord affirmed that the revelations of the prophets shall not fail (D&C 58:8).

 

It is my opinion that the "feast of fat things" for the poor was the law of consecration. The Lord had revealed this law as a part of the law of the Church (D&C 42:30-34). This revelation and subsequent revelations show that the purpose for the law of consecration was to benefit and even eliminate the poor (D&C 42:30; 78:3; 82:12). Although all nations were to be invited (D&C 58:9), there was a sequence to be followed. The first ones to be invited were "the rich and the learned, the wise and the noble" (D&C 58:10). The poor, the lame, the blind, and the deaf would then be invited. That the first group may represent the Gentiles and that the poor may represent the house of Israel was verified in the revelation outlining the law of consecration: "I will consecrate of the riches of those who embrace my gospel among the Gentiles unto the poor of my people who are of the house of Israel" (D&C 42:39). From the Savior's words given to the Nephites, the Gentiles—represented as "mighty above all"—had scattered the house of Israel and had been "a scourge unto the people of this land [the Americas]" (3 Ne. 20:27-28). The Gentiles had been the last to receive the gospel in the Meridian of Time but were to be the first to receive it in this dispensation. It is consistent with past and present prophecies that they were also to be given the first opportunity to participate in the establishment of Zion (Matt. 19:30; 20:16; 1 Ne. 13:42; D&C 29:30). This opportunity for the Gentiles is the "day of calling," which the Lord referred to in a later revelation (D&C 105:35), the day when the Gentiles are offered the opportunity to use their might, power, and intellect to build Zion. However, the prophecies also foretell that instead of accepting this opportunity, they would not only reject it but would be the ones who would bring the tribulation upon the Saints who were laying the foundation of Zion (3 Ne. 16:8-10). Following this rejection, and the failure of the Gentiles to use their power, the Lord said that he will bring about the day of his power. Through the Lord's power, the poor, the lame, the blind, and the deaf would participate in the marriage of the Lamb—the covenant between Israel and Christ— and partake of the supper of the Lord—the law of consecration— prepared for the great day to come, the Second Coming (D&C 58:11).

 

The house of Israel's opportunity to establish Zion is the "day of choosing" which follows the "day of calling" (the opportunity of the Gentiles referred to above; D&C 105:35). The law of consecration is the law which will be lived in the day of the choosing of the house of Israel to go and build Zion (D&C 105:3-5, 34). The Colesville, New York, Saints were among the first members of the Church to settle in Missouri. They previously had been designated to practice the law of consecration at Thompson, Ohio, on a tract of land donated by Leman Copley. fn Copley broke his agreement and left the Colesville Saints in distress. The Prophet Joseph sent them on to Missouri, where they would be given another opportunity to enter into the law of consecration. Those who will live there in the "day of chosing" will live in accordance with that law.

 

The Accomplishment of God's Purposes

 

After stating the purposes for the gathering to Missouri, the Lord gave further instructions regarding how to accomplish these purposes. As a further clarification of their second purpose, to bear testimony of the land from "the city of the heritage of God" (D&C 58:13), the Lord outlined the stewardship of the bishop in Zion, Edward Partridge, or his successor if he did not repent (D&C 58:14-16). His stewardship was to be a judge in Israel, as in ancient days. His responsibilities were twofold: to divide the lands of the heritage of God (the city of Zion), and to "judge his people by the testimony of the just, and by the assistance of his counselors, according to the laws of the kingdom which are given by the prophets of God" (D&C 58:17-18). The Lord cautioned that the leaders in Zion were not to consider themselves as rulers but reminded them that God should rule the judges. The Lord also gave instructions concerning the Saints keeping the laws of the land. These instructions correspond to the 12th Article of Faith, which declares that the Church and its members are to be subject to the leaders and the laws of the land. The Lord then gave instruction concerning Edward Partridge and other leaders in Zion. Zion was to be the land of their residence; therefore, they were to "bring their families to this land as they shall counsel between themselves and me" (D&C 58:24-25). This seems to be an affirmation of the same principle revealed in section 9 of the Doctrine and Covenants regarding the process of the translation of the Book of Mormon. Oliver Cowdery was told to study it out in his mind and then go to the Lord for confirmation of the correctness of the translation (D&C 9:8-9). Similarly, the families were to discuss and determine the best time and way to come to Zion and then seek the Lord's approval on their decision.

 

Following these instructions, the Lord explained further why he expected the families first to use their own resources and thinking before consulting him. Throughout the years, these verses often have been taken out of context and greatly misunderstood by some members of the Church. Some have justified their failure to consult the Lord when making major decisions with the excuse that the Lord does not want them to bother him in matters which they have the ability to think through themselves. They base this justification upon verses 26 and 27. Those who so reason have failed to read carefully all that the Lord says on the matter. Verse 28 declares that men have the power in them to be their own agents. This power is the power of the Spirit, as is shown in v. 38 of the same revelation. All people are born with the light of Christ, which enables them to choose or discern good from evil (Moro. 7:12-16). This principle is implied at the end of verse 28, where it is stated that men who "do good [use the Spirit to discern their actions] shall in nowise lose their reward." The Lord is not pleased with those who do nothing but expect him to tell them what to do. On the other hand, he expects his children to confirm their well-pondered decisions with him—so as not to make mistakes—rather than proceeding without consulting him. The Lord had told Joseph Smith earlier, "you cannot always judge the righteous, or . . . you cannot always tell the wicked from the righteous" (D&C 10:37). If the Prophet Joseph Smith was unable to so tell, then certainly we today must rely on the Lord for confirmation of our decisions. The Lord also reminded the Saints, in this same context, that if men do not obey, the blessings connected with the commandments are revoked. The Lord further cited Martin Harris as an example for the Church in laying his moneys before the bishop. He gave further instruction concerning William W. Phelps' calling as the printer for the Church. Both Harris and Phelps were called to repent, and the Lord took that opportunity to enlarge on the principle of repentance (D&C 58:42-43).

 

When Will the Wilderness Blossom?

 

Having sufficiently answered the second question for the time being (concerning the time of the building of Zion), the Lord turned to the first question asked by the Prophet, "When will the wilderness blossom as a rose?" In answering the question, the Lord addressed the next part of the revelation to the rest of the elders of the Church, telling what they must do in the many years before the time of the redemption of Zion (D&C 58:44). In a previous revelation the Lord apparently had paraphrased Isa. 35:1-2 in declaring that "before the great day of the Lord shall come, Jacob shall flourish in the wilderness and the Lamanites shall blossom as the rose" (D&C 49:24). Perhaps this revelation was also on the Prophet's mind prior to the revealing of sections 57 and 58, as he contemplated "the state of the Lamanites and the lack of civilization, refinement, and religion among the people generally" in the wilderness where Jacob was to flourish.

 

The Gathering to America

 

Again using Old Testament prophecies, the Lord declared that the assignment of the Saints was to "push the people together from the ends of the earth" (D&C 58:45). Students of the Old Testament will recognize this phrase as a blessing of Moses on the descendants of Joseph (Deut. 33:13-17). The land given to Joseph's descendants was America (3 Ne. 15:12-13). In order for the wilderness to blossom, the children of Ephraim and Manasseh must be gathered together on the entire land of the Americas, not only in Missouri. This was to be accomplished through the preaching of the gospel in the regions round about. Since the house of Israel had been scattered among the Gentiles (Host 8:8-10; Amos 9:8-9), the preaching of the gospel among the Gentiles in the surrounding regions would be the process of gathering together "the ten thousands of Ephraim and . . . the thousands of Manasseh" (Deut. 33:17). Ephraim, being the birthright holder of all of Israel, would of necessity be gathered first. But included also would be thousands of the children of Manasseh, Joseph's other son, because America was given to all of Joseph's children.

 

As these people were assembled, they were to "build up churches" (D&C 58:48), as the people repented and made covenants with the Lord. The elders were to preach for a limited time and then return to their homes. They were to preach and bear record as they came and went, so that the gospel would be preached to everyone. Again drawing from the words of Isaiah, the Lord reminded the Saints that the gathering of the latter days was not to be done "in haste, nor by flight" (D&C 58:56; cf. Isa. 52:12), as the exodus from Egypt under Moses had been accomplished. The extent of the gathering was to be governed through direction given by the elders of the Church, as given at the conferences of the Church (D&C 58:56). A look at church history will certainly verify that this has been followed. Earlier in the history, people who accepted the gospel were advised to gather to the established stakes of Zion, while later they were admonished to remain in their own areas and there build up the stakes of Zion. The commandment to look to the conferences is still in effect, and if there are to be different or further instructions given, it will be given through this procedure. For instance, when the day of calling to redeem Zion comes, as outlined in D&C 105, the Church will be advised collectively, though the calling will be on an individual basis as declared in that revelation.

 

The next four revelations (sections 59-62) also concern Zion and the surrounding regions. Space does not allow a full treatise of these, but they are an extension of what was revealed in sections 57 and 58. Section 59 gives instructions regarding the laws which must be lived by those coming to Zion and particularly how the Sabbath was to be observed. Sections 60-62 are instructions to the elders who were traveling to and from Zion regarding how they should best travel to preach the gospel more effectively.

 

Conclusion

 

Three years after sections 57-62 were received, the Lord told the Saints that they would have to wait "for a little season" for the redemption of Zion. He then outlined several things which had to happen before Zion would be redeemed (D&C 105). When that will take place is another subject, but by this time the Saints' obedience had been tested, they had been prepared to bear testimony of Zion, they had laid the foundation of Zion by designating and dedicating the site for the temple, and the Lord had revealed to them the law of consecration, which they had lived temporarily. Their cause was met, the regions have been and are still being built up, and the wilderness has begun to blossom. Today we wait for the decree to return to build Zion, as the further requirements outlined in section 105 are met.

 

Notes The Redemption of Zion

 

1. HC 1:189-90; see also the preface to D&C 57, 1981 edition.

 

2. HC 1:196.

 

3. See the preface to D&C 49 (1981 edition) for background on Leman Copley, and D&C 51 for the commandment to establish the law of consecration.

 

 

(Robert L. Millet and Kent P. Jackson, eds., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 1: The Doctrine and Covenants [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1989], 234.)

 

D&C 58:3-4 – The Lord warns the saints things won’t go along as fast as they expect, the work is on His timetable not ours, Elder Oaks, “Timing”.  Verses 6-7, they are to build the foundation, not put the roof on!

 

D&C 58:8-12 – The millennium is discussed, the marriage refers to the 10 virgins.  Rich means receiving the blessings of the House of Israel, the poor are those without the gospel.

 

D&C 58:24-29 – We have the Holy Ghost to receive personal revelation, specific counsel can come to you directly from the Lord, “the power is in them”.  It isn’t through your priesthood leader!  You can find out the Lord’s will for yourself.

 

 

GOD

 

 

                                  General                                       Specific

                                  Priesthood                                               YOU                                                                                     Leaders

 

MAN      

 

 

D&C 58:45 & Deuteronomy 33:13-17 – The tribal mission of Joseph, the Horns of the Ox is the priesthood power, the gathering in stakes all over the world will take some time, it’s happening, but at the Lord’s timetable.

 

The Redemption of Zion

(D&C 57-62)

 

MONTE S. NYMAN

 

On 20 July 1831 the Prophet Joseph Smith asked three poignant questions of the Lord as he observed the degenerate conditions which existed in Missouri, in which he and other elders had recently arrived. These three questions were: "When will the wilderness blossom as a rose? When will Zion be built up in her glory, and where will thy Temple stand unto which all nations shall come in these last days?" fn All three of these questions are associated with the writings of Isaiah, the Old Testament prophet. He had prophesied that the desert would blossom as a rose (Isa. 35:1), he had foreseen the glory of the Lord upon Zion (Isa. 60:1-2), and he had foretold concerning the temple in the last days unto which all nations would flow (Isa. 2:2). It is reasonable to assume that Joseph had been reading the prophet Isaiah and was contemplating the fulfillment of these prophecies in these latter days.

 

The Lord revealed what is now section 57 as an answer to his apparently disappointed prophet. Although he did not directly answer all three questions, he did answer the last question directly and indirectly gave instructions which, as we will see, led to the answers to the first two questions. The Lord concluded with a promise to reveal further directions later.

 

Where Will Thy Temple Stand?

 

The place for the temple was designated in Independence, Missouri (D&C 57:3). On 2 August 1831, Sidney Rigdon, acting under the Prophet's direction, dedicated the area "for an inheritance for the Saints." The next day, Joseph Smith dedicated the site for the temple. fn These events reaffirmed an earlier revelation that Missouri was indeed a land consecrated to the Lord's chosen people (D&C 52:1-2). The Lord's instructions were to buy land and divide it among the incoming Saints, and to print materials to further the preaching of the gospel for the gathering of the people. This would lead to the eventual building of Zion.

 

On 1 August 1831, the Lord kept his promise to give further directions by revealing what is now designated as section 58. In this revelation, the first two questions asked by the Prophet were answered. The second question, "When will Zion be built up in her glory?" was answered first.

 

When Will Zion Be Built?

 

The wording of the revelation (section 58) seems to have been chosen very carefully, as, undoubtedly, is that of all revelations. It is emphasized here to illustrate that the Saints did not read the revelation as carefully as the Lord gave it. The Saints were first told that Zion was not to be built up at this time but would be built after they had experienced much tribulation. They were assured, however, that their eternal reward would be just as great as though they had built Zion. The Lord then referred to the future glory which was to come after much tribulation, which glory was beyond their comprehension. He then reaffirmed that tribulation was to come before the glory of Zion and cautioned them to consider carefully ("lay it to heart") what he had told them (D&C 58:2-5). Whether or not they comprehended this part of the revelation cannot be determined for sure, but it seems that the Saints anticipated that they would build Zion immediately.

 

Purposes for Going to Missouri

 

In the next part of the revelation, the Lord outlined the cause, or the purposes, for which he had at that time sent the Saints to Missouri. These purposes were introduced with the admonition for them to receive this stewardship (D&C 58:5), again implying that they would not build Zion. There are four basic purposes outlined by the Lord. The first was a test of obedience for those Saints. They had already been obedient to revelation in coming to Missouri. In a later revelation, the Lord revealed that all his people must be "tried even as Abraham" (D&C 101:14). The trial of Abraham was to receive with obedience all things by the revelation of the Lord (D&C 132:29). The trial of these Saints would come through their obedience to the other purposes which the Lord was now revealing to them concerning the land of Zion. They were to prepare their hearts so that they could bear testimony of what was to come—the building of Zion. One can bear testimony more assuredly when one has personal knowledge and experience upon which to base that testimony. These people would be so prepared, having been residents of the area. This was the second purpose for which the Lord had brought them to Missouri. The third purpose for their coming to Missouri was to lay the foundation for the city of the Zion of God. This was an honor that the Lord gave them, but it also enhanced their ability to bear testimony of the land. Their last purpose for being in Missouri was one which probably was not understood by the Saints then nor by many today. It was to prepare a feast for the poor.

 

As stated earlier, the Prophet Joseph may have been studying Isaiah's prophecies when he asked the questions leading to these revelations. After referring to the wording found in another prophecy of Isaiah which was linked with the establishment of Zion (Isa. 25:6), the Lord affirmed that the revelations of the prophets shall not fail (D&C 58:8).

 

It is my opinion that the "feast of fat things" for the poor was the law of consecration. The Lord had revealed this law as a part of the law of the Church (D&C 42:30-34). This revelation and subsequent revelations show that the purpose for the law of consecration was to benefit and even eliminate the poor (D&C 42:30; 78:3; 82:12). Although all nations were to be invited (D&C 58:9), there was a sequence to be followed. The first ones to be invited were "the rich and the learned, the wise and the noble" (D&C 58:10). The poor, the lame, the blind, and the deaf would then be invited. That the first group may represent the Gentiles and that the poor may represent the house of Israel was verified in the revelation outlining the law of consecration: "I will consecrate of the riches of those who embrace my gospel among the Gentiles unto the poor of my people who are of the house of Israel" (D&C 42:39). From the Savior's words given to the Nephites, the Gentiles—represented as "mighty above all"—had scattered the house of Israel and had been "a scourge unto the people of this land [the Americas]" (3 Ne. 20:27-28). The Gentiles had been the last to receive the gospel in the Meridian of Time but were to be the first to receive it in this dispensation. It is consistent with past and present prophecies that they were also to be given the first opportunity to participate in the establishment of Zion (Matt. 19:30; 20:16; 1 Ne. 13:42; D&C 29:30). This opportunity for the Gentiles is the "day of calling," which the Lord referred to in a later revelation (D&C 105:35), the day when the Gentiles are offered the opportunity to use their might, power, and intellect to build Zion. However, the prophecies also foretell that instead of accepting this opportunity, they would not only reject it but would be the ones who would bring the tribulation upon the Saints who were laying the foundation of Zion (3 Ne. 16:8-10). Following this rejection, and the failure of the Gentiles to use their power, the Lord said that he will bring about the day of his power. Through the Lord's power, the poor, the lame, the blind, and the deaf would participate in the marriage of the Lamb—the covenant between Israel and Christ— and partake of the supper of the Lord—the law of consecration— prepared for the great day to come, the Second Coming (D&C 58:11).

 

The house of Israel's opportunity to establish Zion is the "day of choosing" which follows the "day of calling" (the opportunity of the Gentiles referred to above; D&C 105:35). The law of consecration is the law which will be lived in the day of the choosing of the house of Israel to go and build Zion (D&C 105:3-5, 34). The Colesville, New York, Saints were among the first members of the Church to settle in Missouri. They previously had been designated to practice the law of consecration at Thompson, Ohio, on a tract of land donated by Leman Copley. fn Copley broke his agreement and left the Colesville Saints in distress. The Prophet Joseph sent them on to Missouri, where they would be given another opportunity to enter into the law of consecration. Those who will live there in the "day of chosing" will live in accordance with that law.

 

The Accomplishment of God's Purposes

 

After stating the purposes for the gathering to Missouri, the Lord gave further instructions regarding how to accomplish these purposes. As a further clarification of their second purpose, to bear testimony of the land from "the city of the heritage of God" (D&C 58:13), the Lord outlined the stewardship of the bishop in Zion, Edward Partridge, or his successor if he did not repent (D&C 58:14-16). His stewardship was to be a judge in Israel, as in ancient days. His responsibilities were twofold: to divide the lands of the heritage of God (the city of Zion), and to "judge his people by the testimony of the just, and by the assistance of his counselors, according to the laws of the kingdom which are given by the prophets of God" (D&C 58:17-18). The Lord cautioned that the leaders in Zion were not to consider themselves as rulers but reminded them that God should rule the judges. The Lord also gave instructions concerning the Saints keeping the laws of the land. These instructions correspond to the 12th Article of Faith, which declares that the Church and its members are to be subject to the leaders and the laws of the land. The Lord then gave instruction concerning Edward Partridge and other leaders in Zion. Zion was to be the land of their residence; therefore, they were to "bring their families to this land as they shall counsel between themselves and me" (D&C 58:24-25). This seems to be an affirmation of the same principle revealed in section 9 of the Doctrine and Covenants regarding the process of the translation of the Book of Mormon. Oliver Cowdery was told to study it out in his mind and then go to the Lord for confirmation of the correctness of the translation (D&C 9:8-9). Similarly, the families were to discuss and determine the best time and way to come to Zion and then seek the Lord's approval on their decision.

 

Following these instructions, the Lord explained further why he expected the families first to use their own resources and thinking before consulting him. Throughout the years, these verses often have been taken out of context and greatly misunderstood by some members of the Church. Some have justified their failure to consult the Lord when making major decisions with the excuse that the Lord does not want them to bother him in matters which they have the ability to think through themselves. They base this justification upon verses 26 and 27. Those who so reason have failed to read carefully all that the Lord says on the matter. Verse 28 declares that men have the power in them to be their own agents. This power is the power of the Spirit, as is shown in v. 38 of the same revelation. All people are born with the light of Christ, which enables them to choose or discern good from evil (Moro. 7:12-16). This principle is implied at the end of verse 28, where it is stated that men who "do good [use the Spirit to discern their actions] shall in nowise lose their reward." The Lord is not pleased with those who do nothing but expect him to tell them what to do. On the other hand, he expects his children to confirm their well-pondered decisions with him—so as not to make mistakes—rather than proceeding without consulting him. The Lord had told Joseph Smith earlier, "you cannot always judge the righteous, or . . . you cannot always tell the wicked from the righteous" (D&C 10:37). If the Prophet Joseph Smith was unable to so tell, then certainly we today must rely on the Lord for confirmation of our decisions. The Lord also reminded the Saints, in this same context, that if men do not obey, the blessings connected with the commandments are revoked. The Lord further cited Martin Harris as an example for the Church in laying his moneys before the bishop. He gave further instruction concerning William W. Phelps' calling as the printer for the Church. Both Harris and Phelps were called to repent, and the Lord took that opportunity to enlarge on the principle of repentance (D&C 58:42-43).

 

When Will the Wilderness Blossom?

 

Having sufficiently answered the second question for the time being (concerning the time of the building of Zion), the Lord turned to the first question asked by the Prophet, "When will the wilderness blossom as a rose?" In answering the question, the Lord addressed the next part of the revelation to the rest of the elders of the Church, telling what they must do in the many years before the time of the redemption of Zion (D&C 58:44). In a previous revelation the Lord apparently had paraphrased Isa. 35:1-2 in declaring that "before the great day of the Lord shall come, Jacob shall flourish in the wilderness and the Lamanites shall blossom as the rose" (D&C 49:24). Perhaps this revelation was also on the Prophet's mind prior to the revealing of sections 57 and 58, as he contemplated "the state of the Lamanites and the lack of civilization, refinement, and religion among the people generally" in the wilderness where Jacob was to flourish.

 

The Gathering to America

 

Again using Old Testament prophecies, the Lord declared that the assignment of the Saints was to "push the people together from the ends of the earth" (D&C 58:45). Students of the Old Testament will recognize this phrase as a blessing of Moses on the descendants of Joseph (Deut. 33:13-17). The land given to Joseph's descendants was America (3 Ne. 15:12-13). In order for the wilderness to blossom, the children of Ephraim and Manasseh must be gathered together on the entire land of the Americas, not only in Missouri. This was to be accomplished through the preaching of the gospel in the regions round about. Since the house of Israel had been scattered among the Gentiles (Host 8:8-10; Amos 9:8-9), the preaching of the gospel among the Gentiles in the surrounding regions would be the process of gathering together "the ten thousands of Ephraim and . . . the thousands of Manasseh" (Deut. 33:17). Ephraim, being the birthright holder of all of Israel, would of necessity be gathered first. But included also would be thousands of the children of Manasseh, Joseph's other son, because America was given to all of Joseph's children.

 

As these people were assembled, they were to "build up churches" (D&C 58:48), as the people repented and made covenants with the Lord. The elders were to preach for a limited time and then return to their homes. They were to preach and bear record as they came and went, so that the gospel would be preached to everyone. Again drawing from the words of Isaiah, the Lord reminded the Saints that the gathering of the latter days was not to be done "in haste, nor by flight" (D&C 58:56; cf. Isa. 52:12), as the exodus from Egypt under Moses had been accomplished. The extent of the gathering was to be governed through direction given by the elders of the Church, as given at the conferences of the Church (D&C 58:56). A look at church history will certainly verify that this has been followed. Earlier in the history, people who accepted the gospel were advised to gather to the established stakes of Zion, while later they were admonished to remain in their own areas and there build up the stakes of Zion. The commandment to look to the conferences is still in effect, and if there are to be different or further instructions given, it will be given through this procedure. For instance, when the day of calling to redeem Zion comes, as outlined in D&C 105, the Church will be advised collectively, though the calling will be on an individual basis as declared in that revelation.

 

The next four revelations (sections 59-62) also concern Zion and the surrounding regions. Space does not allow a full treatise of these, but they are an extension of what was revealed in sections 57 and 58. Section 59 gives instructions regarding the laws which must be lived by those coming to Zion and particularly how the Sabbath was to be observed. Sections 60-62 are instructions to the elders who were traveling to and from Zion regarding how they should best travel to preach the gospel more effectively.

 

Conclusion

 

Three years after sections 57-62 were received, the Lord told the Saints that they would have to wait "for a little season" for the redemption of Zion. He then outlined several things which had to happen before Zion would be redeemed (D&C 105). When that will take place is another subject, but by this time the Saints' obedience had been tested, they had been prepared to bear testimony of Zion, they had laid the foundation of Zion by designating and dedicating the site for the temple, and the Lord had revealed to them the law of consecration, which they had lived temporarily. Their cause was met, the regions have been and are still being built up, and the wilderness has begun to blossom. Today we wait for the decree to return to build Zion, as the further requirements outlined in section 105 are met.

 

Notes The Redemption of Zion

 

1. HC 1:189-90; see also the preface to D&C 57, 1981 edition.

 

2. HC 1:196.

 

3. See the preface to D&C 49 (1981 edition) for background on Leman Copley, and D&C 51 for the commandment to establish the law of consecration.

 

 

(Robert L. Millet and Kent P. Jackson, eds., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 1: The Doctrine and Covenants [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1989], 234.)

 

D&C 59:1-2 – If the Saints had an eye single to the glory of God; there would have been no trouble in Missouri.  It will be a long time before Zion will be established; you’ll be dead along with your children.

 

D&C 59:5-12 – The New Ten Commandments.

 

 

5 Wherefore, I give unto them a commandment, saying thus: Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, with all thy might, mind, and strength; and in the name of Jesus Christ thou shalt serve him.

 

6 Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself. Thou shalt not steal; neither commit adultery, nor kill, nor do anything like unto it.

 

7 Thou shalt thank the Lord thy God in all things.

 

8 Thou shalt offer a sacrifice unto the Lord thy God in righteousness, even that of a broken heart and a contrite spirit.

 

9 And that thou mayest more fully keep thyself unspotted from the world, thou shalt go to the house of prayer and offer up thy sacraments upon my holy day;

 

10 For verily this is a day appointed unto you to rest from your labors, and to pay thy devotions unto the Most High;

 

11 Nevertheless thy vows shall be offered up in righteousness on all days and at all times;

 

12 But remember that on this, the Lord's day, thou shalt offer thine oblations and thy sacraments unto the Most High, confessing thy sins unto thy brethren, and before the Lord.

 

 

D&C 97:1-6 – The Lord was telling Joseph that some were faithful, but not all; a picture is being given to Joseph.

 

D&C 97:8-21 – Building the temple is very important to the Lord, it wasn’t done.

 

Counsel to the Exiles

(D&C 97-101)

 

ROBERT A. CLOWARD

 

In the revelations of the latter months of 1833 we find a most poignant portrayal of the relationship of the Lord to his people. In those times of their extreme need, the veils of formality and habit that too often separate God's people from him were parted. They cried out to him as humbled children. In the urgency of their need, they sought his hiding place. They searched their souls to purge out what might have offended him. They yearned for his response.

 

He heard their cries, and as an Exalted Father, he answered. This was a teaching moment, and if we are attuned to the Spirit that attends these revelations, we too can learn the lessons of Zion's redemption. As God counseled the exiles, he counsels us as well, for we share their quest. We too must establish Zion.

 

Historical Background

 

The joy of the Saints at learning the revealed location of the land of Zion was all too soon tempered by their dismay at the difficulties which encumbered them. The Lord had designated Jackson County as the place for the city of Zion in July 1831 (D&C 57:1-2), but within two years, vicious mobs were organized to expel the Saints from the county. In addition to the threats from without, a spirit of variance and dissension pervaded much of the Church in Missouri. Writing in January 1833 on behalf of a council of high priests in Kirtland, Hyrum Smith and Orson Hyde said, "we feel more like weeping over Zion than we do like rejoicing over her." fn

 

On 20 July 1833 a mob destroyed the printing establishment of William W. Phelps, and three days later Church leaders were forced to sign a pledge that they and the other members of the Church would leave Jackson County. Despite attempts at legal redress, severe persecution continued, and the majority of the Saints had been driven from their homes to take refuge in Clay, Ray, Van Buren, Lafayette, and other counties by November of that year. In sections 97, 98, 100, and 101., the Lord answered their questions and shared with them divine counsel.

 

The Saints' Questions

 

It is not difficult to imagine the kinds of questions that filled the hearts of the Saints as they faced the reality of their exile. This was an Abrahamic test—a test of incongruence, designed to try the foundations of their conviction. Undoubtedly they asked even the most basic questions: "Art thou there?" "Hast thou heard our prayers?" "Hast thou rejected us?" And if they were still found acceptable to the Lord, the flood of questions would continue: "Why have we been forced out of the designated gathering place?" "Is this persecution necessary?" "Will Zion be redeemed?" "Is there to be a new gathering place?" "How can we recover our lands and homes?" "Can we depend upon the law?" "Should we seek revenge upon our persecutors?" "What about thy temple?" fn

 

The Lord's Answers

 

Be Still

 

The Lord gave merciful answers. In one forceful phrase, he assured them of his concern for their plight: "Be still and know that I am God" (D&C 101:16). This command, the first person climax of Psalm 46, invoked the entire psalm, applicable in every way to their situation: "God is our refuge and strength, a very present help in trouble" (Ps. 46:1). fn

 

My People Must Be Tried in All Things

 

The opening verses of sections 97, 98, and 101 further defined the Saints' standing before the Lord. In section 101, for example, he assured them that they were not rejected, but he clarified his personal role in their affliction: "I, the Lord, have suffered the affliction to come upon them, wherewith they have been afflicted, in consequence of their transgressions; Yet I will own them, and they shall be mine in that day when I shall come to make up my jewels" (vv. 2-3, italics added). In an earlier revelation, the blessing of being among the chosen jewels of God was specified as belonging to those who did not incur his anger by failing to be faithful (D&C 60:2-4). It must have been reassuring to the exiles that despite their failings they were not rejected as his chosen people. The Lord made abundantly clear, however, why he had allowed them to be persecuted. They had polluted their inheritances with "jarrings, and contentions, and envyings, and strifes, and lustful and covetous desires among them. . . . They were slow to hearken unto the voice of the Lord their God. . . ." And, he added, "In the day of their peace they esteemed lightly my counsel" (D&C 101:6-8).

 

The Lord was careful to emphasize his approval of righteous individuals. He was pleased with the humble truth seekers and with the meek (D&C 97:1-2). He was "well pleased" with Parley P. Pratt, who with diligence and personal sacrifice had been directing a school of elders. fn Those who were honest and contrite and willing to observe their covenants by sacrifice were accepted of the Lord (D&C 97:8). Nevertheless, the Missouri Saints as a whole were not a people worthy of Zion: "Behold, here is wisdom concerning the children of Zion, even many, but not all; they were found transgressors, therefore they must needs be chastened" (D&C 101:41).

 

Zion Shall Be Redeemed

 

While Joseph Smith and Sidney Rigdon were on a mission in New York in October, 1833, their hearts were understandably turned to the troubles of the Saints in Zion. Was the center place to be lost to the mobs of the adversary? The Lord responded, "Zion shall be redeemed, although she is chastened for a little season" (D&C 100:13). It was perhaps to this comforting revelation that the Prophet referred in a letter addressed to the exiled Saints on 10 December 1833:

 

I cannot learn from any communication by the Spirit to me, that Zion has forfeited her claim to a celestial crown, notwithstanding the Lord has caused her to be thus afflicted, except it may be some individuals, who have walked in disobedience, and forsaken the new covenant; all such will be made manifest by their works in due time. I have always expected that Zion would suffer some affliction, from what I could learn from the commandments which have been given. But I would remind you of a certain clause in one which says, that after much tribulation cometh the blessing. By this, and also others, and also one received of late, I know that Zion, in the due time of the Lord, will be redeemed. fn

 

Section 101, dated six days after this letter, answered another significant question. "Zion shall not be moved out of her place, notwithstanding her children are scattered. They that remain, and are pure in heart, shall return, and come to their inheritances, they and their children, with songs of everlasting joy, to build up the waste places of Zion. . . . And, behold, there is none other place appointed than that which I have appointed . . . for the work of the gathering of my saints—Until the day cometh when there is found no more room for them; and then I have other places which I will appoint unto them, and they shall be called stakes, for the curtains of the strength of Zion" (D&C 101:17-18, 20-21).

 

Jackson County, therefore, was the gathering place. Its redemption was assured. However, it was not the Lord's intention to make clear yet when and how this was to be accomplished. His instructions on the matter in section 101 were all preliminary. First, the Saints were to continue to "gather together, and stand in holy places" (v. 22; cf. v. 64, note the plural in both cases). Second, the gathering was to be "according to the parable of the wheat and the tares" (v. 65). That is, the time of the final separation of the righteous from the wicked had not yet come. Third, the gathering was not to be done with haste, but the Saints were to let all things be prepared before [them]" (v. 68). Fourth, all available land in Jackson County and the surrounding counties was to be purchased by the Saints, including those in the churches of the east, and honorable and wise men were to be appointed to make these purchases (vv. 70-75). Fifth, the Saints were to continue to importune for redress according to the laws and constitution of the people (vv. 76-77).

 

A sixth recourse was foreshadowed in the Lord's parable concerning Zion (vv. 43-62), i.e., that Zion could be redeemed by an army of warriors from among the Lord's servants. fn For the time being, however, the Saints were to "renounce war and proclaim peace" (D&C 98:16). The Lord at this point retained for himself the responsibility for Zion's redemption, and he had sworn and decreed and given his promise with an immutable covenant that the Saints' prayers would be answered (D&C 98:2-3). Their responsibility, bitterly underscored by their trials, was to "forsake all evil and cleave unto all good" and to "live by every word which proceedeth forth out of the mouth of God" (D&C 98:11).

 

Forgive Others, That Your Father May Forgive You

 

The Missouri exiles needed answers for their normal and human questions about whether or not to retaliate against their enemies. The Lord's answers included principles that could refine them into a celestial people. At one point, he bluntly taught them that if they and their families did not bear their smitings patiently, their impatience itself would render their smitings just (D&C 98:24)! The Lord's laws of retaliation, war, and revenge in section 98 were ultimately laws of mercy, peace, and reconciliation. While allowing for justice, they encouraged forebearance, kindness, and love.

 

In several revelations the exiles were taught that concern for their physical well-being was secondary and that death for the Lord's cause brought the promise of life eternal: "Be not afraid of your enemies, for I have decreed in my heart, saith the Lord, that I will prove you in all things, whether you will abide in my covenant, even unto death, that you may be found worthy. For if ye will not abide in my covenant ye are not worthy of me" (D&C 98:14-15; cf. 98:18 and 101:15, 35-38).

 

The House of the Lord in Zion

 

The question of the building of the temple in Zion remained open at this point. fn The Lord intended his people to be chastened, and leaving them to grieve the loss of the privilege of building a house in which all the pure in heart could see God (D&C 97:16) was chastening indeed. Parley P. Pratt wrote that the revelation given in section 97, which included the command to build the Lord's house "speedily," "was not complied with by the leaders and Church in Missouri, as a whole; notwithstanding many were humble and faithful. Therefore, the threatened judgment was poured out to the uttermost, as the history of the five following years will show." fn

 

Conditions of the Heart

 

During the Missouri persecutions the Lord made the conditions of the heart a major focus of his counsel to his children. He commanded them to be pure, humble, hopeful, and obedient. They had gone to Jackson County to establish Zion, but "this is Zion—THE PURE IN HEART" (D&C 97:21). The Saints were law-abiding citizens, contrary to the rumors circulated by the mobs, fn but the Lord required more. In his words, "all among them who know their hearts are honest, and are broken, and their spirits contrite, and are willing to observe their covenants by sacrifice—yea, every sacrifice which I, the Lord, shall command—they are accepted of me" (D&C 97:8).

 

The Lord expressed his approval for those in Zion who were "truly humble and . . . seeking diligently to learn wisdom and to find truth" (D&C 97:1). Humility is a basic requirement for a proper relationship with the Lord. It is listed first among the requirements for baptism (D&C 20:37). It must accompany confession and repentance (D&C 20:6; 61:2). It is a key to receiving the blessings of prayer (D&C 112:10; 136:32), even to the rending of the veil (D&C 67:10). And humility is essential for those who would be gathered in the last days (D&C 29:1-2).

 

In the stark face of persecution, loss of property, and even the threat of death, the Lord counseled the Saints to have hope: "Fear not even unto death; for in this world your joy is not full, but in me your joy is full" (D&C 101:36). What godly perspective, compared to the reactions of the natural man! Neither anger nor self-pity were acceptable responses to the Lord's chastening. He was teaching his people to center their focus on him, not on their difficulties.

 

Zion can only be established among the obedient. So often has the Lord enjoined the principle of obedience in this dispensation that it may justifiably be called the central theme of his revelations and the first law of heaven: "And in nothing doth man offend God, or against none is his wrath kindled, save those who confess not his hand in all things, and obey not his commandments" (D&C 59:21). Obedience is the definition of a godly man. To be acceptable it must not be blind obedience, reluctant obedience, or forced obedience. Proper obedience is more than obeying. It is a condition of the heart. The Lord illustrated this in a commandment to Joseph Smith: "Prepare thy heart to receive and obey the instructions which I am about to give unto you" (D&C 132:3, italics added). Hearts unprepared to obey are not worthy before the Lord, and the lesson of proper obedience was crucial for this dispensation, in which Zion cannot fail. It was better that a few should suffer and perish than that a generation should defile the land of Zion by presuming to establish God's holy place in unworthiness.

 

Learning About God

 

The universal worth of the Doctrine and Covenants flows from the breadth of the Lord's perspective. Nineteenth-century events brought revelations of principle that retain significance far beyond their time. In his revelations, the Lord seemed to urge his people to look past the concern of the moment and learn the bigger lesson. For example, when the concern of the moment was a confrontation with lawlessness and mobocracy, the Lord taught in section 98 the value of electing honest and wise men to public office (vv. 9-10), the need for upholding and befriending the constitutional law of the land (vv. 4-7), and the need not just to proclaim peace in Missouri, but to "seek diligently to turn the hearts of the children to their fathers, and the hearts of the fathers to the children; And again, the hearts of the Jews unto the prophets, and the prophets unto the Jews; lest I come and smite the whole earth with a curse, and all flesh be consumed before me" (vv. 16-17). The Second Coming was repeatedly stressed by the Lord as the time of ultimate vengeance on the lawless and of reward for those who had suffered persecution and endured in faith (D&C 97:13-17; 101:23-35).

 

When the concern of the moment was the building of a temple that would not appear during the lifetime of any of the nineteenth-century Saints, the Lord taught the importance of all such holy places. Temples, he said, are places of thanksgiving, of instruction for those called to the ministry, and places suited for perfecting the Saints in their understanding of theory, principle, and doctrine pertaining to the kingdom of God on the earth (D&C 97:13-14). Furthermore, temples are places where his glory rests, where his presence dwells, and where the pure in heart that come may see him (D&C 97:15-16). The principle of guarding temples against being defiled by unclean things, lest the Lord's presence withdraw (D&C 97:15-17), is so significant that in our day it is to be discussed in every temple recommend interview.

 

After detailing the reasons for which he had suffered affliction to come upon the Saints in Jackson County, the Lord added, "Verily I say unto you, notwithstanding their sins, my bowels are filled with compassion towards them. I will not utterly cast them off; and in the day of wrath I will remember mercy" (D&C 101:9). To learn this balance of justice and mercy, wrath and love, is to learn about God. He would later teach about "reproving betimes with sharpness, when moved upon by the Holy Ghost; and then showing forth afterwards an increase of love toward him whom thou hast reproved, lest he esteem thee to be his enemy" (D&C 121:43). God is love, but he did not condone partial commitment or intermittent covenant-keeping. He did not mitigate deserved punishment. He spewed the lukewarm Saints out of the center place of Zion. Then, he taught them the depths of his compassion.

 

We do well to reassess constantly our standing before the Lord. If we are presumptuously arrogant about our chosenness or our righteousness, we may find his reminder of our real status surprisingly stern. Should we not be grateful that, as Alma taught his wayward son Corianton, "there was a time granted unto man to repent, yea, a probationary time, a time to repent and serve God" (Alma 42:4)?

 

To Those Who Return

 

In a much earlier dispensation, a people was rejected by the Lord as unworthy and unprepared to inherit a promised land. They were left to spend forty years in the wilderness. During that time they felt his wrath; they also experienced his love. They were exiles, yet the day came when he judged their children to be an acceptable generation, and through their prophet he gave them instructions to inherit the promised land.

 

In the due time of the Lord, a latter-day generation will be judged acceptable to establish the center place of Zion and build the temple there. They may well hear words from their prophet like those of Moses—counsel to those who return:

 

All the commandments which I command thee this day shall ye observe to do, that ye may live, and multiply, and go in and possess the land which the Lord sware unto your fathers.

 

And thou shalt remember all the way which the Lord thy God led thee these forty years in the wilderness, to humble thee, and to prove thee, to know what was in thine heart, whether thou wouldest keep his commandments, or no.

 

And he humbled thee, and suffered thee to hunger, and fed thee with manna, which thou knewest not, neither did thy fathers know; that he might make thee know that man doth not live by bread only, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of the Lord doth man live.

 

Thy raiment waxed not old upon thee, neither did thy foot swell, these forty years.

 

Thou shalt also consider in thine heart, that, as a man chasteneth his son, so the Lord thy God chasteneth thee.

 

Therefore thou shalt keep the commandments of the Lord thy God, to walk in his ways, and to fear him.

 

For the Lord thy God bringeth thee into a good land (Deut. 8:1-7).

 

Notes Counsel to the Exiles

 

1. HC 1:319.

 

2. See Monte S. Nyman, "The Redemption of Zion," found herein.

 

3. A reading of the whole psalm is instructive. The Savior similarly invoked an entire psalm with a phrase when he exclaimed on the cross, "My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?" See Matt. 27:46 and Ps. 22.

 

4. See Parley P. Pratt, Autobiography of Parley Parker Pratt (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1938), pp. 93-94.

 

5. HC 1:453-54.

 

6. See Richard D. Draper, "Maturing Toward the Millennium," found herein.

 

7. The Lord did not resolve this issue for his Saints until five years later in connection with a revelation on the Nauvoo Temple. See D&C 124:45-55, and Robert A. Cloward, "Revelations in Nauvoo," found herein.

 

8. Autobiography, p. 96.

 

9. Alexander Majors, son of a Missouri mobster reported: "There is nothing in the county records to show that a Mormon was ever charged with any misdemeanor in the way of violation of the laws," Alexander Majors, Seventy Years on the Frontier (Chicago and New York: Rand, McNally, and Co., 1893), pp. 49-50, cited in Ivan J. Barrett, Joseph Smith and the Restoration (Provo, Ut.: Brigham Young University Press, 1973), p. 240.

 

 

(Robert L. Millet and Kent P. Jackson, eds., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 1: The Doctrine and Covenants [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1989], 379.)

 

 D&C 101 explains why.  Money for two temples was not the problem, (Kirtland and Independence), the saints were covetous toward physical things.  The parable of Redemption of Zion was given, the tower = temple.

 

They had an Abrahamic test and failed.  The Missourians weren’t the main problem; the strife in the Church was the real problem.

 

D&C 103:1-16 – Both parties were at fault, both were accountable.

 

While Zion's Camp was near the banks of Fishing River, the Lord gave them an important revelation concerning Zion and his purposes in relation to her redemption. The Lord introduces his commandment by the first statement that Zion could have been redeemed. "Behold, I say unto you, were it not for the transgressions of my people, speaking concerning the church and not individuals, they might have been redeemed even now"; but because the members of the Church had not learned to be obedient to the things the Lord had required at their hands, but were full of evil and refused to impart of their substance to the poor and the afflicted and were not united according to the union which the Lord had required of them, they would have to suffer, and wait for the redemption of Zion. The Lord said that Zion could not be built up unless it be by the principles of the law of the celestial kingdom. On no other terms could Zion be received by him. Because of the selfishness and disobedience, it became necessary for the Church to be chastened until the members learn obedience, even by the things which they would be called upon to suffer. If we who are living today were wise, we would profit by the example of our fathers and show a willingness to obey all of the Lord's commandments. Human nature is so constituted that men will learn in no other school except that of experience and punishment for disobedience. We, today, are following in the same path of insecurity, refusing to be obedient even to the extent of keeping a lesser law than that given to our fathers.

 

In that day when branches of the Church were called upon to assist their brethren they said, "Where is their God? Behold, he will deliver them in time of trouble, otherwise we will not go up unto Zion, and will keep our moneys." There were many who refused to go with the Prophet in Zion's Camp or send money to help their afflicted brethren. Because of this lack of faith and obedience, instead of redeeming Zion at that time, the Lord declared that Zion should have to "wait for a little season." This waiting was for the purpose of preparing the members of the Church, through faith, obedience, experience in suffering if they would not repent, so that they would eventually be willing to be obedient. To this day we have failed and Zion is not redeemed. We can hasten its redemption if we will be united in purpose and keep all of the commandments the Lord has required of us. This redemption could not come until there was an endowment from on high.

 

 

(Joseph Fielding Smith, Church History and Modern Revelation, 4 vols. [Salt Lake City: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 1946-1949], 3: 37.)

 

 

What was the response to this call?

 

The Missouri Saints' difficulties culminated with their being driven out of Jackson County during the late fall of 1833. In February of the following year this revelation called for up to five hundred volunteers to help restore the refugees to their homes, and recruiting efforts were launched for what became known as "Zion's Camp." That group began its long march from New Portage, Ohio, on 8 May 1834. After it crossed the Mississippi River its numerical strength peaked at "207 men, 11 women, 11 children, and 25 baggage wagons" (Church History in the Fulness of Times, 143). By the time Zion's Camp reached Missouri, both Church leaders and the state's governor concluded that conditions were not favorable for calling out the militia to assist the Saints in returning to their lands in Jackson County.

 

Though the avowed purpose of the camp was not realized, "it was definitely not an exercise in futility, but rather served as the forge in which the Lord tempered the steel of many of his early leaders" (Doctrine and Covenants Student Manual, 258). Many future Church leaders demonstrated their faith and devotion to the cause of Zion during this difficult march. For several weeks, the Prophet personally instructed these men as they camped and marched together. Nine of the original Twelve Apostles and all of the original Quorum of Seventy were chosen from among those who had responded to the call to join Zion's Camp. Furthermore, this lengthy cross-country trek provided valuable experience to Church leaders who a dozen years later would have to direct the forced evacuation of men, women, and children from Nauvoo under much more difficult circumstances.

 

 

(Richard O. Cowan, Answers to Your Questions About the Doctrine and Covenants [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1996], 122.)

 

 

D&C 105:1-12 – Zion’s Camp fulfilled its mission, God is thinking of the whole earth, not a spot of land in Missouri.  Future leaders were tried, tested, and trained along the way, for some it was their 1st time being close to Joseph.

 

 

The Church has improved greatly in public relations since the early days of this dispensation.

 

 

 

The Kirtland Temple

 

March 11, 2004

 

 

Church government was still forming in Kirtland, for example, the Quorum of the 12 was held in equal standing with the stake High Council.  The 12 received their preeminence in Nauvoo after their missions to England.

 

Missionary work in Canada by Parley P. Pratt brought notable members such as John Taylor and Artemus Millet, the architect of the Kirtland temple.

 

The scriptures were printed in Kirtland, like the Book of Commandments in 1835.

 

Someone asked what happened to the original documents and manuscripts the church had in Kirtland and Nauvoo.  Bruce said many of these things were left while the saints went west.  The Smith family kept some of them as personal property, Emma and Lucy showed these documents to people for a small fee, no one knows what happened to them.

 

The best years in Joseph’s life were 1835 to 1836, no major persecution.  He was preparing the saints for the great spiritual endowment, the building of the Kirtland temple. 

 

During this time the mission to England was beginning, 4 were called to go.

 

Something New

From The Life of Heber C. Kimball
pp. 103-105

At this crisis in the affairs of the Church, the Lord revealed to Joseph that "something new" must be done for its salvation. The good ship Zion, storm-tossed and tempest-driven, her sails rent, her timbers sprung, a portion of her officers and crew in open mutiny, was drifting with fearful rapidity toward the rocks and breakers of destruction.

Joseph was denounced as a "fallen prophet" by men who had been his immediate friends and confidential advisers, and the divinity of his mission was being doubted by many who had received through him a testimony of the truth, the gift of the Holy Ghost, a knowledge of God and Christ, whom to know is life eternal.

"No quorum in the Church," says he, "was entirely exempt from the influence of those false spirits who were striving against me for the mastery. Even some of the Twelve were so far lost to their high and responsible calling, as to begin to take sides, secretly, with the enemy."

What "new thing," under these circumstances, was destined to "save the Church"? In what way was Joseph's mission, as a prophet of the living God, to be revindicated in the eyes of the Saints and of the world?

"On Sunday, the 4th day of June, 1837," says Heber C. Kimball, "the Prophet Joseph came to me, while I was [p.104] seated in front of the stand, above the sacrament table, on the Melchizedek side of the Temple, in Kirtland, and whispering to me, said, 'Brother Heber, the Spirit of the Lord has whispered to me: "Let my servant Heber go to England and proclaim my Gospel, and open the door of salvation to that nation."'"

The thought was overpowering. He had been surprised at his call to the apostleship. Now he was overwhelmed. Like Jeremiah he staggered under the weight of his own weakness, exclaiming in self-humiliation: "O, Lord, I am a man of stammering tongue, and altogether unfit for such a work; how can I go to preach in that land, which is so famed throughout Christendom for learning, knowledge and piety; the nursery of religion; and to a people whose intelligence is proverbial!"

"Feeling my weakness to go upon such an errand, I asked the Prophet if Brother Brigham might go with me. He replied that he wanted Brother Brigham to stay with him, for he had something else for him to do. The idea of such a mission was almost more than I could bear up under. I was almost ready to sink under the burden which was placed upon me.

"However, all these considerations did not deter me from the path of duty; the moment I understood the will of my Heavenly Father, I felt a determination to go at all hazards, believing that He would support me by His almighty power, and endow me with every qualification that I needed; and although my family was dear to me, and I should have to leave them almost destitute, I felt that the cause of truth, the Gospel of Christ, outweighed every other consideration.

"At this time many faltered in their faith; even some of the Twelve were in rebellion against the Prophet of [p.105] God. John F. Boynton said to me, 'If you are such a fool as to go at the call of the fallen prophet, Joseph Smith, I will not help you a dime, and if you are east on Van Dieman's land, I will not make an effort to help you.' Lyman E. Johnson said he did not want me to go on my mission, but if I was determined to go, he would help me all he could; he took his cloak from off his back and put it on mine; which was the first cloak I ever had.

"Brothers Sidney Rigdon, Joseph Smith, Sen., Brigham Young, Newel K. Whitney and others said, 'Go and do as the Prophet has told you, and you shall prosper and be blessed with power to do a glorious work.' Hyrum, seeing the condition of the Church, when he talked about my mission, wept like a little child; he was continually blessing and encouraging me, and pouring out his soul in prophecies upon my head; he said: 'Go, and you shall prosper as not many have prospered.'"
 
 
   
The 1st convert in England was George Watts, a professional stenographer who was a major aid to the church in taking minutes and notes of meetings and talks; he was the main recorder for the Journal of Discourses.

The Apostasy of Kirtland

From The Life of Heber C. Kimball
pp. 98-102

During the absence of Apostle Kimball in the east, a grievous change had come over the Church in Kirtland. The greed of gain, the spirit of speculation was abroad in the land. Mammon had reared his altars on consecrated ground. The money-changer was within the temple. The love of the things of earth had usurped, in many hearts, the love of the things of heaven, and comparatively few were free from the soul-destroying influence of idolatry. Idolatry? Yes; the bowing down to the modern Baal, the worship of wealth—the god of gold—the lust after the ways and pleasures of the world.

The order of Christ's kingdom is the order of creation; firstly spiritual, secondly temporal. When this order is subverted, "chaos is come again." Sorrow is the inevitable consequence of apostasy from the spiritual to the temporal. "To be carnally-minded is death; but to be spiritually-minded is life and peace." Does not the fall of man illustrate this principle? Can he descend from heaven to earth without causing and enduring pain?

The spiritual must sway the temporal, the earthly be ruled by the heavenly. How else shall it be sanctified?  It is the spirit in man that moves the body, not the body the spirit. In the Church, Christ's body, the spiritual must reign supreme. The temporal on the heart's throne is ever the usurper; the spiritual crowned and sceptered, ruler by right divine. . . .

"We were very much grieved," says Heber, "on our arrival in Kirtland, to see the spirit of speculation that was prevailing in the Church. Trade and traffic seemed to engross the time and attention of the Saints. When we left Kirtland a city lot was worth about $150; but on our return, to our astonishment, the same lot was said to be worth from $500 to $1000, according to location; and some men, who, when I left, could hardly get food to eat, I found on my return to be men of supposed great wealth; in fact everything in the place seemed to be moving in great prosperity, and all seemed determined to become rich; in my feelings they were artificial or imaginary riches. This appearance of prosperity led many of the Saints to believe that the time had arrived for the Lord to enrich them with the treasures of the earth, and believing so, it stimulated them to great exertions, so much so that two of the Twelve, Lyman E. Johnson and John F. Boynton, went to New York and purchased the amount of $20,000 worth of goods, and entered into the mercantile business, borrowing considerable money from Polly Voce and other Saints in Boston and the regions round about, and which they have never repaid."

The Prophet Joseph says of those times: "The spirit of speculation in lands and property of all kinds, which [p.100]was so prevalent throughout the whole nation, was taking deep root in the Church. As the fruits of this spirit, evil surmising, fault-finding, disunion, dissension and apostasy followed in quick succession, and it seemed as though all the powers of earth and hell were combining their influence in an especial manner to overthrow the Church at once and make a final end. The enemy abroad and apostates in our midst united in their schemes, flour and provisions were turned towards other markets, and many became disaffected towards me, as though I were the sole cause of those very evils I was strenuously striving against, and which were actually brought upon us by the brethren not giving heed to my counsel."

During this period, the Kirtland Safety Society was organized, with a view to controlling the prevailing sentiment and directing it in legitimate channels. The ablest and staunchest men in Israel, including the Prophet and most of the Apostles, were made officers and members of the association.

Then came the financial crash of 1837, by which so many of the banking and business houses of the country were prostrated. Nearly all the banks, one after another, suspended specie payment, "and gold and silver rose in value in direct ratio with the depreciation of paper currency." The Kirtland Bank shared a similar fate to many others, and went down in the whirlpool of financial ruin. One of the causes alleged for its failure was the misfeasance of some of those who were entrusted with the funds of the Bank. Heber says that Warren Parfish, one of the clerks, "afterwards acknowledged that he took $20,000, and there was strong evidence that he took more. Those of integrity in the Church replaced the stolen money at the expense of all they had." A counterfeit, falsely  reputed to have been issued by the Bank, was also used by its enemies as a means to effect its overthrow.

As usual the onus of responsibility was placed upon the shoulders of the Prophet, although he had withdrawn from the institution some time before. He was falsely accused of dishonesty and fraud, and condemned beyond measure, by men in and out of the Church, as though he were the sole and intentional cause of the catastrophe.

"This order of things," continues Heber, "increased during the winter to such an extent that a man's life was in danger the moment he spoke in defense of the Prophet of God. During this time I had many days of sorrow and mourning, for my heart sickened to see the awful extent that things were getting to. The only source of consolation I had, was in bending my knees continually before my Father in Heaven, and asking Him to sustain me and preserve me from falling into snares, and from betraying my brethren as others had done; for those who apostatized sought every means and opportunity to draw others after them. They also entered into combinations to obtain wealth by fraud and every means that was evil.

"At this time, I had many dreams from the Lord; one of them I will relate. I dreamed that I entered the house of John F. Boynton, in which there was a panther; he was jet black and very beautiful to look upon, but he inspired me with fear; when I rose to leave the house he stood at the door with the intention to seize on me, and seeing my fear, he displayed his beauty to me, telling me how sleek his coat was, and what beautiful ears he had, and also his claws, which appeared to be of silver, and then he showed me his teeth, which also appeared to be silver. John F. Boynton told me that if I made myself familiar with him he would not hurt me, but if I did not [p.102] he would. I did not feel disposed to do so, and while the panther was displaying to me his beauty, I slipped through the door and escaped, although he tried to keep me back by laying hold of my coat; but I rent myself from him. The interpretation of this dream was literally fulfilled. The panther represented an apostate whom I had been very familiar with. I felt to thank the Lord for this dream, and other intimations that I had, which, by His assistance, kept me from falling into snares."

The hour was approaching when Heber C. Kimball was destined to make his great mark as an Apostle of the Lord Jesus Christ, to perform a work that would perpetuate his memory, and make his name "a household word" upon the lips of tens of thousands in both hemispheres.
 
 
 
 Kirtland Economy

 

[This article reports the main facts and points of interest regarding the economic events in Kirtland in the 1830s and the significance of this historical development in the overall growth of the Church.]

 

In early 1830, Kirtland, Ohio, was a small rural trading center of approximately 1,000 people, none of whom was LDS (see History of the Church: c. 1831-1844). Six years later, it was a bustling community of 3,000, with commercial, mercantile, and small manufacturing firms, and a temple serving the 2,000 Latter-day Saints in the town. Despite its rapid growth and apparent prosperity, within another two years Joseph Smith departed Kirtland, leaving behind disgruntled creditors, warrants for his arrest, a failed banking experiment, and a divided Mormon population preparing to leave the temple and their homes. By 1840, only 200 Latter-day Saints remained in Kirtland.

 

The study of the Kirtland economy between 1830 and 1840 continues to generate controversy among historians. One question has to do with the precipitous increases in the land prices between 1832 and 1837. Were they the result of "reckless land speculation" by Joseph Smith and other Church leaders? The average price per acre of land sold in Kirtland rose from approximately $7 in 1832 to $44 in 1837, only to fall back to $17.50 in 1839. These dramatic changes, however, were related to movements in the general price level, trends in the value of land in neighboring communities, and the impact of population growth. Probably between 25 and 40 percent of the change in the nominal price of land was associated with generalized inflation during this period. As much as 84 percent of the remaining change in the real price of land was correlated with the rise and fall in population. Joseph Smith was primarily responsible for the call to gather to Kirtland; naturally, the newcomers needed land. An examination of land transactions reveals nothing in the buying, selling, or subdividing of land that was unusual for a frontier community.

 

Another question has to do with Joseph Smith's debts. Was his use of credit "irresponsible"? Early studies of the economic difficulties in Kirtland emphasized debts and ignored assets. Actually, Joseph Smith's potential cumulative indebtedness during this period, including all purchases of land and merchandise, totaled a little over $100,000, considerably below earlier estimates by some historians. At least $60,000 of this debt was eventually settled, and probably much more, since the remainder produced no lawsuits and primarily represented debt for land, which would likely have been paid for or the land reclaimed. At the same time, because of the increase in prices, President Smith and his associates held almost $60,000 equity in land. In the environment of rapid population growth from 1830 to 1837, many New York, Buffalo, and Cleveland merchants willingly extended Joseph Smith credit. His position of leadership in an expanding community, the value of his current assets, and the expectation of continued growth made these transactions reasonable at the time.

 

The financial problems of Church leaders arose from two circumstances. First, their debts were largely in the form of 90-to-180-day notes, while their assets were primarily in nonliquid land. Second, Joseph Smith found it very difficult to demand cash from the sale of land or goods to his followers, many of whom were impoverished by the costly migration to Kirtland. The resulting cash-flow problem, common in frontier communities, could have been alleviated by a bank with the capacity to transfer long-term assets into short-term liquidity.

 

In the fall of 1836, Joseph Smith and his associates drew up a charter for such a bank, the Kirtland Safety Society. The question of fraud has long hovered over the Society. Its timing was unfortunate. During 1836 and 1837, the Ohio legislature, dominated by the hard-money wing of the Democratic Party, refused all applications for bank charters. Within a week of realizing the hopelessness of their request for a charter, Church leaders, probably with legal counsel judging from the language of the document, formed a joint stock company and began issuing notes sometimes stamped "anti-banking" notes.

 

Because an 1816 Ohio law forbade the issuance of unauthorized money, some have thought that the Kirtland Safety Society notes were illegal. But the definition of what constituted "unauthorized" money remained controversial as late as 1873. Several other commercial institutions in Ohio issued notes or scrip, including the Ohio Railroad Company, which issued almost $100,000 of scrip during the same year as the Kirtland Safety Society. Whigs, soft-money Democrats, and several newspapers encouraged such action in opposition to what they considered the unlawful and unconstitutional behavior of the hard-money majority in the legislature.

 

Heavy demand for redemption of the Kirtland Safety Society's notes led to the suspension of specie payments within its first month of operation. Thereafter, the notes were backed by land values, rather than specie, and almost immediately its notes circulated at a heavy discount. It was further buffeted by the nationwide banking panic of May 1837, when all Ohio banks suspended specie payment. The tenacious Kirtland bank, or anti-bank, continued its faltering operations until November, when it closed its doors for the last time.

 

The Kirtland Safety Society's first note issue during January 1837 was probably not for more than $15,000. Subsequent note issues may have totaled as much as $85,000 in face value, but the increasing discounts against these issues probably kept the real value of outstanding notes at about the January level or lower. At the time of the initial issue, paid-in subscriptions were also approximately $15,000. That amount, plus the unusual loyalty of the LDS community and a $3,000 loan from the Bank of Geauga, might have provided resources sufficient for a legally chartered bank in Kirtland to experience modest success.

 

Whatever might have been, the institution did not have a bank charter and did not survive, thereby adding substantially to Joseph Smith's financial woes. He bought more stock, paid more per share than 85 percent of the other investors, and continued to add his own money to the assets of the bank as late as April 1837, well after it had suspended specie payments. After the banking panic of May, Joseph Smith transferred his interests in the bank and other financial assets to Oliver Granger and Jared Carter, who continued to attempt to settle Joseph's financial obligations as late as 1843.

 

Bibliography

 

Adams, Dale W. "Chartering the Kirtland Bank." BYU Studies 23 (Fall 1983):467-82.

Fielding, R. Kent. "The Mormon Economy in Kirtland, Ohio." Utah Historical Quarterly 27 (Oct. 1959):331-56.

Hill, Marvin S.; C. Keith Rooker; and Larry T. Wimmer. "The Kirtland Economy Revisited: A Market Critique of Sectarian Economics." BYU Studies 17 (Summer 1977):391-475.

Parkin, Max H. "Conflict at Kirtland: A Study of the Nature and Causes of External and Internal Conflict of the Mormons in Ohio Between 1830 and 1838." M.A. thesis, Brigham Young University, 1966.

Sampson, D. Paul, and Larry T. Wimmer. "The Kirtland Safety Society: The Stock Ledger Book and the Bank Failure." BYU Studies 12 (Summer 1972):427-36.

 

LARRY T. WIMMER

 

(Encyclopedia of Mormonism, 1-4 vols., edited by Daniel H. Ludlow (New York: Macmillan, 1992), 792.)
 
 
 
 
In 1837 Joseph had to flee Kirtland because of the persecution in the area.  People blamed him for the tremendous debt and greediness of others, many people left the church at this time.

The Kirtland temple served a dual role for the saints.  It was a temple and a school house.  Many rooms were used for classroom instruction.  The School of the Prophets originated here, the purpose was to teach missionaries doctrine and grammar.  Each room was dedicated at its completion, D&C 94:1-9.  Verses 10-12, discuss the importance of the printing office.  Get the word out to the world, a critical function that we still do today, get the gospel out to the world.

The temple was set up like the tabernacle of Moses, an outer courtyard, inner courtyard, and a Holy of Holies, pictures and drawings are on the website.

Bruce told us the story of Artemus Millet.

The Millet Family

 

Artemus Millet was a wealthy builder in Canada at the time he and his wife learned of the restored gospel in late 1832. A family history tells the story:

 

Brigham Young was given a special mission [by the Prophet Joseph Smith] to go to Canada and baptize Bro. Artemus Millet, . . . which call resulted from a consultation held at Kirtland respecting the building of the Temple there, and as to who they could get that was capable of taking charge of the work. When Elder Lorenzo Young exclaimed to the Prophet "I know the very man who is capable of doing this work," "Who is he?" asked the Prophet. Lorenzo replied ["It] is Artemus Millet." The Prophet turned to Brigham and said "I give you a mission to go to Canada and baptise Brother Artemus Millet, and bring him here. Tell him to bring a thousand dollars with him." Artemus was much surprised when Brigham announced his mission to him and [he] asked "What kind of a church is that?" Then Brigham explained the principles of the Gospel to him and he accepted and was baptized. fn

 

Artemus, obedient to the Prophet's call, left his family and went immediately to Kirtland, where he selected stone for the temple foundation. He later returned to Canada, disposed of his property on credit (which became difficult to collect), and took his family to Kirtland to supervise the masonry work on the temple. He deposited money in the Kirtland Safety Society Bank and loaned money to the Church that he never collected. Despite his financial sacrifices, however, Artemus Millet maintained his testimony. He later immigrated with his family to Utah, where his large posterity now enjoys the blessings of the gospel.

 

 

(Karl Ricks Anderson, Joseph Smith's Kirtland [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1989], 19.)
 
   
D&C 78 – The church financed itself after the Law of Consecration failed, private business following the law’s principles aided the church’s finances.

The apostasy of Oliver Cowdery was caused by finance, legal, and business dealings, not on doctrine or denying the Book of Mormon.

The spiritual fire goes out of people when they question their faith, Elder Wirthlin, Oct, 1992.

Faith is built by DESIRE not by HABIT; testimony built adequately and maintained properly will endure to the end when coupled with the gift of the Holy Ghost.

Keeps the FIRE of CONVERSION going; it isn’t based on habit of works, (HT, church meetings, scripture study by themselves).  What is needed is INTENSITY!  Is the gospel infringing on my life?  If so, take a step back and evaluate where you are going.

D&C 118 – the Quorum of the 12 was reorganized, verse 4 states that the missionaries leave from Far West, verse 6 says that the new apostles replace those who apostatized

The apostles today are seasoned members who have been tried and tested (still being tested) while in the early days up into the 20th century there were several who apostatized and fell away, the reasons were plural marriage and doctrinal issues.  Will you go with me wherever I go?

D&C 38:32, 88:70-75,117-120, 134-141 – The temple was built for teaching, spiritual and secular, everyone teaches (120).

January 17, 1836 – the 2nd floor west room (134-141), Jan 21st, the great endowment began (D&C 137).

D&C 137 – Notice what was revealed and not revealed about the salvation for the dead.  The Lord said there is salvation for the dead, but doesn’t explain how, that comes in Section 138, line upon line.

Salvation beyond the Grave

(D&C 137 and 138)

 

ROBERT L. MILLET

 

Elder Boyd K. Packer, in speaking to a group of Church educators, remarked: "We live in a day of great events relating to the scriptures. It has been only a short time since two revelations were added to the standard works." Then, after making brief reference to what are now sections 137 and 138 of the Doctrine and Covenants, he continued: "I was surprised, and I think all of the Brethren were surprised, at how casually that announcement of two additions to the standard works was received by the Church. But we will live to sense the significance of it; we will tell our grandchildren and our great-grandchildren, and we will record in our diaries, that we were on the earth and remember when that took place." fn

 

The Vision of the Celestial Kingdom

 

The historical setting of Joseph Smith's Vision of the Celestial Kingdom (D&C 137) is both inspiring and informative. The headquarters of the Saints had moved from New York and Pennsylvania to Ohio. By 1831 two Church centers were organized, one in Kirtland and the other in Missouri (Zion). Joseph Smith and his people received a commandment as early as 1833 to build a temple in Kirtland and were given profound promises. The Lord instructed that they "should build a house, in the which house I design to endow those whom I have chosen with power from on high" (D&C 95:8). Truly the sacrifices of the Saints brought forth the blessings of heaven as God rewarded the works of his chosen people with a marvelous outpouring of light and truth. fn

 

Joseph and the early leaders of the Church had begun to meet in the temple before its completion, and had participated in washings, anointings, and blessings, all in preparation for what came to be known as the Kirtland Endowment. On Thursday evening, 21 January 1836, the Prophet and a number of Church leaders from Kirtland and Missouri had gathered in the third or attic floor of the Kirtland Temple (in the translating or "President's Room"). After anointings and after all the presidency had laid their hands upon the Prophet's head and pronounced many glorious blessings and prophecies, a mighty vision burst upon the assembled leadership. fn

 

The heavens were opened upon us, and I beheld the celestial kingdom of God, and the glory thereof, whether in the body or out I cannot tell.

 

I saw the transcendent beauty of the gate through which the heirs of that kingdom will enter, which was like unto circling flames of fire;

 

Also the blazing throne of God, whereon was seated the Father and the Son.

 

I saw the beautiful streets of that kingdom, which had the appearance of being paved with gold (vv. 1-4).

 

Joseph had learned by vision in February of 1832 the nature of those who would inherit the highest heaven, the celestial. These persons are they who "overcome by faith, and are sealed by the Holy Spirit of Promise," they "into whose hands the Father has given all things" (D&C 76:53, 55). The Prophet's Vision of the Celestial Kingdom was not unlike John the Revelator's vision of the holy city, the earth in its sanctified and celestial state. "The foundations of the wall of the city," writes John, "were garnished with all manner of precious stones." Further, "the street of the city was pure gold, as it were transparent glass" (Rev. 21:19, 21).

 

Joseph's account of the Vision continues: "I saw Father Adam and Abraham; and my father and my mother; my brother Alvin, that has long since slept; And marveled how it was that he had obtained an inheritance in that kingdom, seeing that he had departed this life before the Lord had set his hand to gather Israel the second time, and had not been baptized for the remission of sins" (D&C 137:5-6). Joseph Smith's brief view of the celestial kingdom permitted him to witness specific personalities who had proven true and faithful in all things, and thus had qualified for exaltation. Adam, the first man and father of the race, had sought the Lord and found him. "Abraham received all things," a revelation stated, "whatsoever he received, by revelation and commandment . . . and hath entered into his exaltation and sitteth upon his throne" (D&C 132:29). That Joseph's vision was a glimpse into the future celestial realm is evident from the fact that he saw his parents—Joseph Sr. and Lucy Mack—in the kingdom of the just, when in fact both were still living in 1836. Father Smith was, interestingly, in the same room with his son at the time the vision was received.

 

Alvin Smith was born on 11 February 1798 in Tunbridge, Vermont, the first-born of Joseph Sr. and Lucy Mack Smith. His was a pleasant and loving disposition, and he always sought out opportunities to aid the family in their continual financial struggles. Joseph Jr. later described his oldest brother as one in whom there was no guile. fn "He was a very handsome man, surpassed by none but Adam and Seth." fn Lucy Mack writes that on the morning of 15 November in 1823, "Alvin was taken very sick with the bilious colic." One physician hurried to the Smith home and administered calomel to Alvin. The dose of calomel "lodged in his stomach," and on the third day of sickness, Alvin became aware of the fact that death was near. He asked that each of the Smith children come to his bedside for his parting counsel and final expression of love. As his mother later recalled, "When he came to Joseph, he said, 'I am going to die, the distress which I suffer, and the feelings that I have, tell me my time is very short. I want you to be a good boy, and do everything that lies in your power to obtain the Record [Joseph had been visited by Moroni less than three months before this time]. Be faithful in receiving instruction, and in keeping every commandment that is given you."' fn Alvin died on 19 November. Lucy Mack Smith wrote of the pall of grief surrounding his passing: "Alvin was a youth of singular goodness of disposition— kind and amiable, so that lamentation and mourning filled the whole neighborhood in which he resided." fn Alvin's brother Joseph wrote many years later: "I remember well the pangs of sorrow that swelled my youthful bosom and almost burst my tender heart when he died. He was the oldest and noblest of my father's family. . . . He lived without spot from the time he was a child. . . . He was one of the soberest of men, and when he died, the angel of the Lord visited him in his last moments." fn

 

Inasmuch as Alvin had died some seven years before the formal organization of the Church (and thus had not been baptized by proper authority), Joseph wondered how it was possible for Alvin to have attained the highest heaven. Alvin's family had been shocked and saddened at his funeral when they heard the Presbyterian minister announce that Alvin would be consigned to hell, having never officially been baptized or involved in the church. William Smith, Alvin's younger brother, recalls: "Hyrum, Samuel, Katherine, and mother were members of the Presbyterian Church. My father would not join. He did not like it because of Rev. Stockton had preached my brother's funeral sermon and intimated very strongly that he had gone to hell, for Alvin was not a church member, but he was a good boy and my father did not like it." fn What joy and excitement must have filled the souls of both Joseph Jr. and Joseph Sr. as they heard the voice of an omniscient and omni-loving God: "Thus came the voice of the Lord unto me, saying: All who have died without a knowledge of this gospel, who would have received it if they had been permitted to tarry, shall be heirs of the Celestial kingdom of God; Also all that shall die henceforth without a knowledge of it, who would have received it with all their hearts, shall be heirs of that kingdom; For I, the Lord, will judge all men according to their works, according to the desire of their hearts" (D&C 137:7-9).

 

God does not and will not hold anyone accountable for a gospel law of which he was ignorant. Every person will have opportunity— here or hereafter—to accept and apply the principles of the gospel of Jesus Christ. Only the Lord, the Holy One of Israel, is capable of "keeping the gate" and thus discerning completely the hearts and minds of mortal men; he alone knows when a person has received sufficient knowledge or impressions to constitute a valid opportunity to receive the Plan of Salvation. Joseph had reaffirmed that the Lord will judge men not only by their actions, but also by their attitudes—the desires of their hearts (cf. Alma 41:3).

 

One of the most profoundly beautiful of doctrines is that enunciated in the Vision of the Celestial Kingdom regarding the status of children who die before the time of accountability: "And I also beheld that all children who die before they arrive at the years of accountability are saved in the Celestial Kingdom of heaven" (D&C 137:10). King Benjamin had learned from an angel that "the infant perisheth not that dieth in his infancy" (Mosiah 3:18). After having described the nature of those who will come forth in the first resurrection, Abinadi said simply: "And little children also have eternal life" (Mosiah 15:25). A revelation given to Joseph Smith in September of 1830 specified that "little children are redeemed from the foundation of the world through mine Only Begotten" (D&C 29:46; cf. JST, Matt. 19:13-15). Joseph Smith taught in 1842 that "the Lord takes many away even in infancy, that they may escape the envy of man, and the sorrows and evils of this present world; they were too pure, too lovely, to live on earth; therefore, if rightly considered, instead of mourning we have reason to rejoice as they are delivered from evil, and we shall soon have them again." fn By virtue of his infinite understanding of the human family, "we may assume that the Lord knows and arranges beforehand who shall be taken in infancy and who shall remain on earth to undergo whatever tests are needed in their cases." fn These children will come forth from the grave as they lie down—as children— fn and will grow to maturity in the Millennium. They will not be expected to face tests or temptations in their resurrected state, but will go on to enjoy the highest and grandest blessings of exaltation associated with the everlasting continuation of the family unit. fn

 

Four and one-half years after Joseph Smith's Vision of the Celestial Kingdom the Prophet delivered his first public discourse on the subject of baptism for the dead at the funeral of Seymour Brunson, a member of the Nauvoo High Council. One man who was in attendance at the funeral has left us the following account:

 

I was present at a discourse that the Prophet Joseph delivered on baptism for the dead 15 August 1840. He read the greater part of the 15th chapter of Corinthians and remarked that the Gospel of Jesus Christ brought glad tidings of great joy . . . . He also said the apostle [Paul] was talking to a people who understood baptism for the dead, for it was practiced among them. He went on to say that people could now act for their friends who had departed this life, and that the plan of salvation was calculated to save all who were willing to obey the requirements of the law of God. He went on and made a very beautiful discourse. fn

 

One month later, on 14 September 1840, Joseph Smith, Sr. passed away. Just before his death, Father Smith requested that someone be baptized for and in behalf of his oldest son, Alvin. Hyrum Smith complied with his father's last wishes, and was baptized by proxy for Alvin in 1840 and again in 1841. fn Alvin received the endowment by proxy on 11 April 1877, and was sealed to his parents on 25 August 1897. fn

 

The Vision of the Redemption of the Dead (D&C 138)

 

The knowledge of a universal salvation revealed initially through the Prophet Joseph continued to be expanded and elaborated as the ongoing Restoration made further truths available "line upon line." It is to the Prophet's nephew—Joseph F. Smith—that we now turn for precious insights into the manner in which the gospel is preached in the world of spirits.

 

During the last six months of his life, President Joseph F. Smith suffered from the effects of advancing years (he was in his 80th year) and spent much of his time in his personal study in the Beehive House. President Smith did manage to garner enough strength to attend the 89th semi-annual conference of the Church (October 1918). At the opening session of the conference (Friday, October 4th) he arose to welcome and address the Saints, and with a voice filled with emotion, spoke the following:

 

As most of you, I suppose, are aware, I have been undergoing a siege of very serious illness for the last five months. It would be impossible for me, on this occasion, to occupy sufficient time to express the desires of my heart and my feelings, as I would desire to express them to you. . . .

 

I will not, I dare not, attempt to enter upon many things that are resting upon my mind this morning, and I shall postpone until some future time, the Lord being willing, my attempt to tell you some of the things that are in my mind, and that dwell in my heart. I have not lived alone these last five months. I have dwelt in the spirit of prayer, of supplication, of faith and of determination; and I have had my communication with the Spirit of the Lord continuously. fn

 

According to the President's son, Joseph Fielding Smith, the Prophet was here expressing (albeit in broadest terms) the fact that during the past half-year he had been the recipient of numerous manifestations, some of which he had shared with his son, both before and following the conference. One of these manifestations, the Vision of Redemption of the Dead, had been received just the day before, on 3 October, and was recorded immediately following the close of the conference. fn

 

The aged Prophet's attention was drawn to the world beyond mortality by his frequent confrontation with death. His parents, Hyrum and Mary Fielding Smith, both died while he was a young man. Among the great trials of his life none was more devastating than the passing of many of his children into death. President Smith was possessed of an almost infinite capacity to love, and thus the sudden departure of dear ones brought extreme anguish and sorrow. Joseph Fielding Smith later wrote: "When death invaded his home, as frequently it did, and his little ones were taken from him, he grieved with a broken heart and mourned, not as those who mourn who live without hope, but for the loss of his 'precious jewels' dearer to him than life itself." fn

 

On 20 January 1918 Hyrum Mack Smith, oldest son of Joseph F. and then a member of the Council of the Twelve Apostles, was taken to the hospital for a serious illness, where the physicians diagnosed a ruptured appendix. Despite constant medical attention and repeated prayers, Hyrum M.—then only 45 years of age and at the time with a pregnant wife—died on the night of 23 January. This was a particularly traumatic affliction for the President. Hyrum had been called as an apostle at the same conference wherein his father had been sustained as the Church's sixth president (October 1901). Hyrum Mack was a man of depth and wisdom beyond his years, and his powerful sermons evidenced his unusual insight into gospel principles. "His mind was quick and bright and correct," remarked President Smith. "His judgment was not excelled, and he saw and comprehended things in their true light and meaning. When he spoke, men listened and felt the weight of his thoughts and words." Finally, the Prophet observed: "He has thrilled my soul by his power of speech, as no other man ever did. Perhaps this was because he was my son, and he was filled with the fire of the Holy Ghost." fn Already in a weakened physical condition due to age, the Prophet's sudden sense of loss caused him "one of the most severe blows that he was ever called upon to endure." fn

 

Even though President Smith indicated in October of 1918 that the preceding six months had been a season of special enrichment, in fact it may be shown that the last thirty months of his life (specifically, from April 1916 to October 1918) represent a brief era of unusual spiritual enlightenment, in which he delivered to the Church some of the most important and inspiring insights of this dispensation.

 

At the April 1916 general conference President Smith delivered a remarkable address, the thrust of which established a theme for the next thirty months of his life, and most important for this discussion, laid the foundation for his final doctrinal contribution—the Vision of the Redemption of the Dead. In his opening sermon entitled "In the Presence of the Divine," Joseph F. spoke of the nearness of the world of spirits, and of the interest and concern for us and our labors exercised by those who have passed beyond the veil. He stressed that those who labored so diligently in their mortal estate to establish the cause of Zion would not be denied the privilege of "looking down upon the results of their own labors" from their post-mortal estate. In fact, the President insisted, "they are as deeply interested in our welfare today, if not with greater capacity, with far more interest, behind the veil, than they were in the flesh." Perhaps the keynote statement of the Prophet in this sermon was the following: "Sometimes the Lord expands our vision from this point of view and this side of the veil, so that we feel and seem to realize that we can look beyond the thin veil which separates us from that other sphere." fn This remark, both penetrating and prophetic, set the stage for the next two and one-half years.

 

In June of 1916 the First Presidency and the Twelve released a doctrinal exposition in pamphlet form entitled "The Father and the Son." This document was delivered to alleviate doctrinal misunderstandings concerning the nature of the Godhead, and specifically the role and scriptural designation of Jesus Christ as "Father." fn

 

One of the most significant fruits of this segment of time was a talk delivered by President Joseph F. Smith at a Temple Fast Meeting in February of 1918, entitled "The Status of Children in the Resurrection." In this address we gain not only an insight into the power and prophetic stature of one schooled and prepared in doctrine; in addition, we are allowed a brief glimpse into the heart of a noble father who—having lost little ones to death and having mourned their absence—rejoices in the sure knowledge that: (1) mortal children are immortal beings, spirits who continue to live and progress beyond the veil; and (2) as taught by the Prophet Joseph Smith, children will come forth from the grave as they lie down—as children—and such persons will thereafter be nurtured and reared to physical maturity by worthy parents. "O how I have been blessed with these children," exulted President Smith, "and how happy I shall be to meet them on the other side!" fn

 

Further evidence that the veil had become thin for Joseph F. is to be found in his recording (on 7 April 1918) of a dream/vision he had received many years earlier, while on his first mission to Hawaii. The dream had served initially to strengthen the faith and build the confidence of a lonely and weary fifteen-year-old on the slopes of Haleakala on the island of Maui; it had, through the years that followed, served to chart a course for Joseph F. and give to him the assurance that his labors were acceptable to the Lord, and that he also had the approbation of his predecessors in the presidency of the restored Church. In the dream young Joseph F. encountered his uncle, the Prophet Joseph, and was fortified in his desire to remain free from the taints of the world. In addition, he learned at an early age that the separation between mortality and immortality is subtle, and that the Lord frequently permits an intermingling of the inhabitants of the two spheres. fn

 

As finite man stands in the twilight of life, he is occasionally able to view existence with divine perspective and is thus capable of opening himself to the things of infinity. "If we live our holy religion," President Brigham Young taught in 1862, "and let the Spirit reign," the mind of man "will not become dull and stupid, but as the body approaches dissolution the spirit takes a firmer hold on the enduring substance behind the veil, drawing from the depths of that eternal Fountain of Light sparkling gems of intelligence which surround the frail and sinking tabernacle with a halo of immortal wisdom." fn This poignant principle was demonstrated beautifully in the life of President Joseph F. Smith. Here was a man who met death and sorrow and persecution with a quiet dignity, and thus through participating in the fellowship of Christ's sufferings was made acquainted with the things of God. On Thursday, 3 October 1918, President Smith, largely confined to his room because of illness, sat meditating over matters of substance. On this day the Prophet specifically began to read and ponder upon the universal nature of the Atonement, and the Apostle Peter's allusions to Christ's post-mortal ministry. The stage was set: preparation of a lifetime and preparation of the moment were recompensed with a heavenly endowment—the Vision of the Redemption of the Dead. In the words of the President: "As I pondered over these things which are written, the eyes of my understanding were opened, and the Spirit of the Lord rested upon me, and I saw the hosts of the dead, both small and great" (D&C 138:11).

 

Joseph F. Smith saw in vision "an innumerable company of the spirits of the just," the righteous dead from the days of Adam to the meridian of time. These all were anxiously awaiting the advent of the Christ into their dimension of life, and were exuberant in their anticipation of an imminent resurrection (vv. 12-17). Having consummated the atoning sacrifice on Golgotha, the Lord of the living and the dead passed in the twinkling of an eye into the world of the departed. The dead, having "looked upon the long absence of their spirits from their bodies as a bondage" (v. 50; cf. D&C 45:17), were, in a sense, in prison. Yes, even the righteous sought "deliverance" (vv. 15, 18); the Master came to declare "liberty to the captives who had been faithful" (v. 18). As Peter had said, Christ went beyond the veil to preach "unto the spirits in prison" (1 Pet. 3:19). Joseph Smith had taught: "Hades, Sheol, paradise, spirits in prison, are all one; it is a world of spirits." fn And as Elder Bruce R. McConkie has explained, in this vision "it is clearly set forth that the whole spirit world, and not only that portion designated as hell, is considered to be a spirit prison." fn

 

To the congregation of the righteous the Lord appeared, and "their countenances shone, and the radiance from the presence of the Lord rested upon them" (v. 24). President Smith observed as the Lord taught "the everlasting gospel, the doctrine of the resurrection and the redemption of mankind from the fall, and from individual sins on conditions of repentance" (v. 19). In addition, Christ extended to the righteous spirits "power to come forth, after his resurrection from the dead, to enter into his Father's kingdom, there to be crowned with immortality and eternal life" (v. 51).

 

It is while pondering the question of how the Savior could have taught the gospel to so many in the spirit world in so short a time (the time intervening between his death on Friday and his rise from the tomb on Sunday morning) that President Smith received what may well be the most significant doctrinal insight of the entire vision. The President came to understand "that the Lord went not in person among the wicked and disobedient"—those in hell—but rather "organized his forces and appointed messengers, clothed with power and authority," that such representatives might carry the message of the gospel "unto whom he [the Lord] could not go personally, because of their rebellion and transgression" (vv. 20-22, 25-30, 37). The chosen messengers "declare the acceptable day of the Lord." They carry the gospel message to those who had no opportunity in mortality to accept or reject the truth, and also to those who rejected the message on earth. These (who are visited by messengers) are taught the first principles and ordinances of the gospel (including the vicarious nature of the ordinances), in order that the inhabitants of the world of spirits might be judged and rewarded by the same divine standards as those who inhabit the world of mortals (vv. 31-34). The insight that Christ did not personally visit the disobedient is a doctrinal matter introduced to the Church for the first time in October of 1918 and does much to broaden our scope and answer questions with regard to the work within that sphere.

 

By the power of the Holy Ghost President Smith perceived the identity of many of the noble and great from the beginning of time, including Adam, Seth, Noah, Abraham, Isaiah, the Nephite prophets before Christ, and many more. In addition, the President recognized Mother Eve and many of her faithful daughters. Joseph F. had taught a number of years earlier that women minister to women in the spirit world, even as they do in holy places on earth. fn

 

It would appear at this point that President Smith's vision shifted in time—from a first century A.D. gathering to a scene of workers in the spirit world during the final gospel dispensation. A change in time-frame is common in visions, as can be seen from the experiences of Nephi (1 Ne. 13-14), John the Apostle (Rev. 11-12), and Joseph Smith (D&C 76). President Smith saw in the spirit world his predecessors in the presidency of the restored Church, and other noble leaders who played such a critical role "in laying the foundations of the great latter-day work" (vv. 53-54).

 

It may be that the vision shifted again in time, allowing President Smith a glimpse into the pre-mortal world. He observed that the great leaders of the latter-day Church were "among the noble and great ones who were chosen in the beginning to be rulers in the Church of God," and he became aware of their pre-mortal lessons, preparation, and foreordination (w. 55-56).

 

President Joseph F. Smith's vision confirms another doctrine that had been taught by Joseph Smith: the faithful in this life continue to teach and labor in the world of spirits in behalf of those who know not God (v. 57). As recorded in George Laub's Journal under date of 12 May 1844, the Prophet Joseph declared: "Now all those die in the faith goe to the prison of Spirits to preach to the deaf in body, but they are alive in the Spirit & those Spirits preach to the Spirits that they may live according to god in the Spirit and men do minister for them in the flesh" (sic). fn Joseph F. had taught this doctrine on a number of occasions; fn here he became an eyewitness of the same.

 

Having laid before us his remarkable vision—"a complete and comprehensive confirmation of the established doctrine of the Church where salvation for the dead is concerned" fn—President Smith climaxed his doctrinal contribution with testimony: "Thus was the vision of the redemption of the dead revealed to me, and I bear record, and I know that this record is true, through the blessing of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, even so. Amen" (v. 60).

 

The Vision of the Redemption of the Dead was dictated by President Smith to his son—Joseph Fielding Smith—at the close of the October 1918 conference. The vision was presented to the First Presidency, Twelve, and Patriarch in a Council Meeting on Thursday, 31 October 1918. Because of his weakened condition, the President was not able to be in attendance but asked Joseph Fielding to read the revelation to the gathered general authorities. Note the following from the journal of Anthon H. Lund, first counselor to President Smith: "In our Council Joseph F. Smith, Jr. read a revelation which his father had had in which he saw the spirits in Paradise and he also saw that Jesus organized a number of brethren to go and preach to the spirits in prison, but did not go himself. It was an interesting document and the apostles accepted it as true and from God." fn Elder James E. Talmage of the Council of the Twelve Apostles recorded the following in his personal journal:

 

Attended meeting of the First Presidency and the Twelve. Today President Smith who is still confined to his home by illness, sent to the Brethren the account of a vision through which, as he states, were revealed to him important facts relating to the work of the disembodied Savior in the realm of departed spirits, and of the missionary work in progress on the other side of the veil. By united action the Council of the Twelve, with the Counselors in the First Presidency, and the Presiding Patriarch accepted and endorsed the revelation as the word of the Lord. President Smith's signed statement will be published in the next issue (December) of the Improvement Era, which is the organ of the Priesthood quorums of the church. fn

 

The text of the vision first appeared in the 30 November edition of the Deseret News. It was printed in the December Improvement Era, and in the January 1919 editions of the Relief Society Magazine, the Utah Genealogical and Historical Magazine, the Young Women's Journal, and the Millennial Star.

 

President Smith's physical condition worsened during the first weeks of November, 1918. On Sunday, 17 November he was taken with an attack of pleurisy, which finally developed into pleuropneumonia. Tuesday morning, 19 November 1918 his work in mortality was completed. It was fitting that at the April 1919 general conference Elder James E. Talmage should deliver the following touching and appropriate tribute to the President. Elder Talmage asked: "Well, where is he now?" The apostle answered: "He was permitted shortly before his passing to have a glimpse into the hereafter, and to learn where he would soon be at work. He was a preacher of righteousness on earth, he is a preacher of righteousness today. He was a missionary from his boyhood up, and he is a missionary today amongst those who have not yet heard the gospel, though they have passed from mortality into the spirit world. I cannot conceive of him as otherwise than busily engaged in the work of the Master." fn

 

Conclusion

 

The Lord loves all of his children and desires that every soul have the privilege of participating in the principles and ordinances of the gospel of Jesus Christ. The doctrine of salvation for the dead, given by revelation through Joseph Smith, and expanded through a remarkable vision of Joseph F. Smith, broadens our own perspective and points us toward the eternities. Joseph Smith's Vision of the Celestial Kingdom opens us to the reality of an omniscient and omni-loving God. Joseph F. Smith's Vision of the Redemption of the Dead sets forth with remarkable clarity the manner in which the Savior "declared liberty to the captives" in the meridian of time, and also unfolds the pattern by which the doctrines of salvation continue to be made known in the world beyond the grave. And so it is that the work of redemption goes forward on both sides of the veil. "Because of this," Peter taught the Saints, "is the gospel preached to them who are dead, that they might be judged according to men in the flesh, but live in the spirit according to the will of God" (JST, 1 Pet. 4:6.)

 

Notes Salvation Beyond the Grave

 

1. "Teach the Scriptures," in Charge to Religious Educators, 2nd ed. (Salt Lake City: Church Educational System, 1982), p. 21; this is the text of a talk delivered to CES personnel 14 October 1977, Salt Lake City.

 

2. See Milton V. Backman, Jr. and Robert L. Millet, "Heavenly Manifestations in the Kirtland Temple," found herein.

 

3. Ibid.; see also HC 2:378-80.

 

4. HC 5: 126.

 

5. Ibid., p. 247

 

6. Lucy Mack Smith, History of Joseph Smith, Preston Nibley, ed. (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1958), pp. 86-89.

 

7. Ibid., p. 88.

 

8. HC 5: 126-27.

 

9. See an interview with William Smith by E. C. Briggs and J. W. Peterson, published in the Deseret News (Salt Lake City), 20 January 1894.

 

10. HC 4:553.

 

11. Bruce R. McConkie, expressing the sentiments of President Joseph Fielding Smith, in "The Salvation of Little Children," Ensign, April 1977, p. 6.

 

12. HC 4:555-56.

 

13. McConkie, "The Salvation of Little Children," pp. 5-6; see also Joseph Fielding Smith, Doctrines of Salvation, 3 vols. (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1954-56), 2:54-57.

 

14. A report by Simon Baker in Journal History, under date of 15 August 1840, LDS Church Archives; also in Andrew F. Ehat and Lyndon W. Cook, The Words of Joseph Smith (Provo, Ut.: Religious Studies Center, Brigham Young University, 1980), p. 49; see also HC 4:231.

 

15. "Nauvoo Baptisms for the Dead," Book A, Church Genealogical Society Archives, pp. 145, 149.

 

16. From Joseph Smith, Sr. Family Group Sheet, Church Genealogical Society Archives.

 

17. "Joseph F. Smith, Conference Report, October 1918, p. 2.

 

18. Joseph Fielding Smith, The Life of Joseph F. Smith (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Company, 1969), p. 466.

 

19. Ibid., p. 455.

 

20. Ibid., p. 474.

 

21. Ibid.

 

22. Conference Report April 1916, pp. 1-8.

 

23. See Improvement Era, August 1916, pp. 93442; James R. Clark, comp., Messages of the First Presidency, 6 vols. (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1971), 5:23-34.

 

24. Improvement Era, May 1918, pp. 567-74; Clark, Messages of the First Presidency, 5:90-98.

 

25. Improvement Era, November 1919, pp. 16-17; Clark, Messages of the First Presidency, 5:99-101; Smith, Life of Joseph F. Smith, pp. 44547.

 

26. JD 9:288.

 

27. HC 5:425.

 

28. Bruce R. McConkie, "A New Commandment: Save Thyself and Thy Kindred," Ensign, August 1976, p. 11.

 

29. See Joseph F. Smith, Young Women's Journal 23 (1911): pp. 128-32; Gospel Doctrine (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1971), p. 461.

 

30. Ehat and Cook, The Words of Joseph Smith, p. 370.

 

31. See Gospel Doctrine, pp. 134-35, 460-61.

 

32. Bruce R. McConkie, "A New Commandment: Save Thyself and Thy Kindred," Ensign, August 1976, p. 11.

 

33. Anthon H. Lund Journal, LDS Church Archives, Salt Lake City; under date of 31 October 1918.

 

34. James E. Talmage Journal, LDS Church Archives, Salt Lake City; under date of 31 October 1918.

 

35. Conference Report, April 1919, p. 60.

 

 

(Robert L. Millet and Kent P. Jackson, eds., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 1: The Doctrine and Covenants [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1989], 549.)

The sacrament is a renewal of our cleansing.  D&C 110 (Wednesday) happened after the sacrament was administered.

D&C 2 – Everything done before April 3, 1836 was in preparation of verse 1, priesthood keys were restored for the last time on the earth.

Right now we have a conditional sealing then after being tried and tested as couples and individuals we can receive the permanent sealing of Elijah, the Holy Spirit of Promise.

When couples receive the promises made to the fathers by entering into the new and everlasting covenant of marriage, and then eventually prove worthy of the ratifying seal of the Holy Spirit of Promise (D&C 132:26), they will be preserved so that certain inhabitants of the earth will not be utterly wasted at the Lord's coming. It is this sealing power, which is also a manifestation of the spirit of Elijah, fn that Joseph apparently had in mind in referring to John's vision (Rev. 7:1-3) of "four destroying angels holding power over the four quarters of the earth until the servants of God are sealed in their foreheads, which signifies sealing the blessings upon their heads, meaning the everlasting covenant, thereby making their calling and election sure." fn

(Robert L. Millet and Kent P. Jackson, eds., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 1: The Doctrine and Covenants [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1989], 61.)

Joseph's recorded discourses indicate that his understanding of the meaning of Elijah's mission apparently moved from "turning hearts" to "planting promises" to "binding or sealing." This progression seems symbolic of the order of the transmission of priesthood keys. Remember that Moses first restored the keys of gathering, symbolically turning us toward one another. Elias then brought all the promises and blessings incident to the Abrahamic covenant. Once the people were gathered, they could be taught and blessed, having the promises planted in their hearts. Elias's power was to draw us to the new and everlasting covenant of eternal marriage and to organize us in family units. However, his power and promises were conditional, as they needed the sealing power brought by Elijah to give formal approval to those marriages and those families, removing their conditional status and making them eternal. Hence, Joseph declared: "This power of Elijah is to that of Elias what in the architecture of the temple of God those who seal or cement the stone to their places are to those who cut or hew the stones, the one preparing the way for the other to accomplish the work. By this we are sealed with the Holy Spirit of Promise, i.e., Elijah." Words of Joseph Smith, p. 344.

 

 

(Byron R. Merrill, Elijah: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1997], .)

 

Missouri Expulsion – Gathering of Israel

March 25, 2004

 

Bruce hurt his back a couple of weeks ago, we didn’t have class last week and this week lasted a little over an hour.

We discussed very briefly the 3 phases of Missouri church history.

The church published constantly so the saints would be united in doctrine and teachings, just like today.

Sidney Rigdon’s “Salt Sermon” had the effect of throwing gas on a fire as far as persecution goes.

The Missouri trials had more to do with politics then religion, though religion played a significant part.

The 2 missions to England had a huge impact on the church.  The new converts infused new blood into the church.

Wilford Woodruff Concerning the Mission to England

The Discourses of Wilford Woodruff, p.309

The whole of that mission to England, from the beginning to the end, placed the in such a position that they had to walk by faith from first to last. The Lord gave a revelation, with date, day, month, and year, when they were to go up to lay the cornerstone in Caldwell county, Far West, Missouri. When that revelation was given, all was peace and quietude, comparatively, in that land. But when the time came for the twelve apostles to fulfil that revelation, the Saints had all been driven out by the exterminating order of Governor Boggs, and it was as much as a man's life was worth, especially one of the twelve, to be found in that state; and when the day came on which we were commanded by the Lord in that revelation to go up and lay the cornerstone of that temple, and there take the parting hand with the Saints, to cross the waters to preach the gospel in England, the inhabitants of Missouri had sworn that if all the revelations of "old Joe Smith" were fulfilled, that one should not be, because it had a day and date to it.

President Young asked the twelve who were with him—"What shall we do with regard to the fulfilment of this revelation?" He wanted to know their feelings. Father Smith, the patriarch, said the Lord would take the will for the deed; others said the Lord could not expect the twelve apostles to go up and sacrifice their lives to fulfil that revelation; but the Spirit of the Lord rested upon the twelve, and they said—"The Lord God has spoken, and we will fulfil that revelation and commandment"; and that was the feeling of President Young and of those who were with him. We went through that state, and we laid that cornerstone. George A. Smith and I were ordained to the apostleship on that cornerstone upon that day. We returned in safety, and not a dog shed our blood.

As soon as we got home we prepared ourselves to go on our mission to England, and, as President Young has said, the devil undertook to kill us. I have myself been in Tennessee and Kentucky for two or three years, where, in the fall, there was not enough well persons to take care of the sick during the ague months, and yet I never had the ague in my life until called to go upon that mission to England. There was not one solitary soul in the quorum of the twelve but what the devil undertook to destroy; and, as was said yesterday, when Brother Taylor and myself, the two first of the quorum ready for the trip, were on hand to start, I was shaking with the ague, and I had it every other day, and on my well day, when I did not have it, my wife had it. I got up and laid my hands upon her and blessed her, and blessed my child, having only one at the time, and I started across the river, and that man who sits behind me today, the President of the Church and kingdom of God upon the earth, paddled me across the Missouri river in a canoe, and that is the way I landed in Nauvoo. I lay down on a side of sole leather by the old post office, and I did not know where to go, and I was not able to stand on my feet, and I lay down there. By and by the Prophet came along and said he—"Brother Woodruff, you are going on your mission?"

"Yes," I said, "but I feel more like a subject for the dissecting room than for a mission."

He reproved me for what I said and told me to get up and go. Brother Taylor, the only member of the quorum of the twelve who was well, and I traveled together, and on the way he fell to the ground as though he had been knocked on the head with an axe. Old Father Coulton was carrying us, and Brother Taylor fell twice in that way, taken with the bilious fever, and no man in that quorum could boast that he went on that mission without feeling the hand of the destroyer, for it was laid upon us all. I had the shaking ague, and lay on my back in a wagon, and was rolled over stumps and stones, until it seemed as if my life would be shaken out of me. I left Brother Taylor behind, by his advice, for said he, "We are both sick, and if you stay you can't do anything here"; so old Father Coulton carried me along in his wagon until I got to Buffalo, New York.
 
   
 
A question came up about Orson Hyde’s mission to Israel, to dedicate the land for the gathering of the Jews.

Elder Hyde’s Mission to Palestine

 

Sometime after Orson Hyde’s baptism, the Prophet Joseph Smith gave Elder Hyde an extraordinary blessing:

 

In due time thou shalt go to Jerusalem, the land of thy fathers, and be a watchman unto the house of Israel; and by thy hands shall the Most High do a great work, which shall prepare the way and greatly facilitate the gathering together of that people. fn

 

As a literal realization of that blessing, Elder Hyde set out nearly a decade later on what may be one of the most arduous missions ever undertaken by a member of the Quorum of the Twelve. His harrowing voyage to Palestine via London, Rotterdam, Constantinople, and Beirut is a matter of record. On arriving in Jerusalem on October 21, 1841—after nearly nineteen months of travel—Elder Hyde recorded his first impressions of the Holy City: "My natural eyes for the first time beheld Jerusalem; and as I gazed upon it and its environs,... a storm of commingled emotions suddenly arose in my breast, the force of which was only spent in a profuse shower of tears." fn

 

Early on Sunday morning, October 24, 1841, Elder Hyde crossed the Kidron Valley and ascended the Mount of Olives; there he built an altar and "in solemn silence, with pen, ink, and paper" offered a dedicatory prayer. fn His prayer contained the following petition:

 

Thou, O Lord, did once move upon the heart of Cyrus to show favor unto Jerusalem and her children. Do Thou now also be pleased to inspire the hearts of kings and the powers of the earth to look with a friendly eye towards this place, and with a desire to see Thy righteous purposes executed in relation thereto. Let them know that it is Thy good pleasure to restore the kingdom unto Israel—raise up Jerusalem as its capital, and constitute her people a distinct nation and government, with David Thy servant, even a descendant from the loins of ancient David to be their king. fn

 

Orson Hyde thereby enunciated a vision of the return of the Jews to their ancestral homeland fifty-six years before Theodor Herzl, the founder of modern Zionism, convened the first Zionist Congress in Basel, Switzerland.

 

I should mention that I do not intend to discuss the policies of the modern state of Israel. Members of the Church have been counseled repeatedly to avoid taking sides in the apparently intractable Middle Eastern conflict. For example, President Howard W. Hunter observed: "We do not need to apologize nor mitigate any of the prophecies concerning the Holy Land. We believe them and declare them to be true. But this does not give us justification to dogmatically pronounce that others of our Father’s children are not children of promise." fn Church leaders have continued to "plead for peace and for coexistence with all the peoples who lay claim to old Jerusalem and the Holy Land: Jewish, Christian, Islamic, and others." fn

 

Nonetheless, given the eventual unfolding of the Lord’s purposes in the Near East, the Jewish return to Palestine is an astonishing phenomenon which cannot be divorced from the events that prophecy has foretold will transpire there. Professor Daniel Peterson concludes, "We need only think for a moment about the sheer improbability of the whole thing to begin to see its miraculous character." fn

 

Some, however, are quick to note that a Jewish return to Palestine "should not necessarily be seen as a ‘fulfillment’ of the spiritual promises made through the ancient and modern prophets." fn "I have occasionally heard Western Christians, including Latter-day Saints," records Peterson, "talk as if we must support every action and every policy of the government of Israel, because that government is the leadership of God’s chosen people. This is false. Worse, I believe it is idolatrous." fn Elder Bruce R. McConkie has been even more explicit:

 

Let there be no misunderstanding in any discerning mind on this point. This gathering of the Jews to their homeland, and their organization into a nation and a kingdom, is not the gathering promised by the prophets. It does not fulfill the ancient promises.... This gathering of the unconverted to Palestine—shall we not call it a political gathering based on such understanding of the ancient word as those without the guidance of the Holy Spirit can attain, or shall we not call it a preliminary gathering brought to pass in the wisdom of him who once was their God?—this gathering, of those whose eyes are yet dimmed by scales of darkness and who have not yet become the delightsome people it is their destiny to be, is nonetheless part of the divine plan. It is Elias going before Messias; it is a preparatory work; it is the setting of the stage for the grand drama soon to be played on Olivet.  Millennial Messiah pg. 229

 

(Harry S. Truman as a Modern Cyrus, BYU Studies, vol. 34 (1994),.)

The Meeting of the Twelve at Far West, April 26, 1839

History of the Church, Vol.3, pp.336-340

 

Friday, April 26.--Early this morning, soon after midnight, the brethren arrived at Far West, and proceeded to transact the business of their mission according to the following minutes:

Minutes of the Meeting of the Twelve Apostles at Far West, April 26, 1839.

At a conference held at Far West by the Twelve, High Priests, Elders, and Priests, on the 26th day of April, 1839, the following resolution was adopted.

Resolved: That the following persons be no more fellowshiped in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, but excommunicated from the same, viz.; Isaac Russell, Mary Russell, John Goodson and wife, Jacob Scott, Sen., and wife, Isaac Scott, Jacob Scott, Jun., Ann Scott, Sister Walton, Robert Walton, Sister Cavanaugh, Ann Wanlass, William Dawson, Jun., and wife, William Dawson, Sen., and wife, George Nelson, Joseph Nelson and wife and mother, William Warnock and wife, Jonathan Maynard, Nelson Maynard, George Miller, John Grigg and wife, Luman Gibbs, Simeon Gardner, and Freeborn Gardner.

The council then proceeded to the building spot of the Lord's House; when the following business was transacted: Part of a hymn was sung, on the mission of the Twelve.

Elder Alpheus Cutler, the master workman of the house, then recommenced laying the foundation of the Lord's House, agreeably to revelation, by rolling up a large stone near the southeast corner.

The following of the Twelve were present; Brigham Young, Heber C. Kimball, Orson Pratt, John E. Page, and John Taylor, who proceeded to ordain Wilford Woodruff, and George A. Smith, (who had been previously nominated by the First Presidency, accepted by the Twelve, and acknowledged by the Church), to the office of Apostles and members of the quorum of the Twelve, to fill the places of those who are fallen. Darwin Chase and Norman Shearer (who had just been liberated from the Richmond prison, where they had been confined for the cause of Jesus Christ) were then ordained to the office of the Seventies.

The Twelve then offered up vocal prayer in the following order; Brigham Young, Heber C. Kimball, Orson Pratt, John E. Page, John Taylor, Wilford Woodruff, and George A. Smith. After which we sung Adam-ondi-Ahman, and then the Twelve took their leave of the following Saints, agreeable to the revelation, viz.: Alpheus Cutler, Elias Smith, Norman Shearer, William Burton, Stephen Markham, Shadrach Roundy, William O. Clark, John W. Clark, Hezekiah Peck, Darwin Chase, Richard Howard, Mary Ann Peck, Artimesa Grainger, Martha Peck, Sarah Grainger, Theodore Turley, Hyrum Clark, and Daniel Shearer.

Elder Alpheus Cutler then placed the stone before alluded to in its regular position, after which, in consequence of the peculiar situation of the Saints, he thought it wisdom to adjourn until some future time, when the Lord shall open the way; expressing his determination then to proceed with the building; whereupon the conference adjourned. BRIGHAM YOUNG, President. JOHN TAYLOR, Clerk.

Thus was fulfilled a revelation of July 8, 1838, which our enemies had said could not be fulfilled, as no "Mormon" would be permitted to be in the state.

As the Saints were passing away from the meeting, Brother Turley said to Elders Page and Woodruff, "Stop a bit, while I bid Isaac Russell good bye;" and knocking at the door, called Brother Russell. His wife answered, "Come in, it is Brother Turley." Russell replied, "It is not; he left here two weeks ago;" and appeared quite alarmed; but on finding it was Brother Turley, asked him to sit down; but the latter replied, "I cannot, I shall lose my company." " Who is your company?" enquired Russell. "The Twelve." “The Twelve!"

"Yes, don't you know that this is the twenty-sixth, and the day the Twelve were to take leave of their friends on the foundation of the Lord's House, to go to the islands of the sea? The revelation is now fulfilled, and I am going with them." Russell was speechless, and Turley bid him farewell.

The brethren immediately returned to Quincy, taking with them the families from Tenney's Grove.
 
 
Ether 13:3-6 – 3 different Jerusalem’s

1.     Verse 3 – New Jerusalem – City of Enoch

2.     Verse 4 – New Jerusalem – Jackson County, 10 Tribes

3.     Verse 5 – Old JerusalemIsrael, Jews

D&C 57:2, 110, 133:1-13 (12-13), Abraham 2:6 – Obedience to the voice of God, (all of the ordinances).

Both new and old Jerusalem lands are dedicated for gatherings.


 The Gathering of Israel Accomplished in Phases

Bruce R. McConkie:
    The gathering of Israel and establishment of Zion in the latter days is divided into three periods or phases. The first phase is past; we are now living in the second phase; and the third lies ahead. Prophecies speak of them all. If we do not rightly divide the word of God, as Paul's expression is, we will face confusion and uncertainty. If on the other hand we correctly envision our proper role and know what should be done today, we shall then be able to use our time, talents, and means to the best advantage in building up the kingdom and preparing a people for the second coming of the Son of Man.
    The three phases of this great latter-day work are as follows:

    Phase I - From the First Vision, the setting up of the kingdom on April 6, 1830, and the coming of Moses on April 3, 1836, to the secure establishment of the Church in the United States and Canada, a period of about 125 years.
    Phase II - From the creation of stakes of Zion in overseas areas, beginning in the 1950's, to the second coming of the Son of Man, a period of unknown duration.
    Phase III - From the Lord's second coming until the kingdom is perfected and the knowledge of God covers the earth as the waters cover the sea, and from then until the end of the Millennium, a period of 1,000 years. ("Come: Let Israel Build Zion," Ensign, May 1977, pp. 115-118)


 Two Gathering Places

There will be two gathering places: one for the Israel (the ten tribes) and one for the Jews. The following are statements relative to this:

    Let them, therefore, who are among the Gentiles flee unto Zion. And let them who be of Judah flee unto Jerusalem, unto the mountains of the Lord's house. (D&C 133:12-13)

The following is from the Proclamation of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles given on 6 April 1845:

    And we further testify that the Lord has appointed a holy city and temple to be built on this continent, for the endowment and ordinances pertaining to the priesthood; and for the Gentiles, and the remnant of Israel to resort unto, in order to worship the Lord, and to be taught in his ways and walk in his paths; in short, to finish their preparations for the coming of the Lord.
    And we further testify, that the Jews among all nations are hereby commanded, in the name of the Messiah, to prepare, to return to Jerusalem in Palestine, and to rebuild that city and temple unto the Lord.
    And also to organize and establish their own political government, under their own rulers, judges, and governors, in that country.
    For be it known unto them that we now hold the keys of the priesthood and kingdom which is soon to be restored unto them.
    Therefore let them also repent, and prepare to obey the ordinances of God. (Messages of the First Presidency, 1:254)
 

In the Times and Seasons, the church newspaper in Nauvoo, Wilford Woodruff wrote the following in relation to the Proclamation of the Quorum of the Twelve of 6 April 1845:

    It is set forward that the Lord has appointed a temple and holy city to be built on the continent of America, for the endowment and ordinances pertaining to the priesthood and for the Gentiles and remnants of Israel to resort unto, in order to worship the Lord, to be taught in his ways and walk in his paths, and finish their preparations for the coming of the Lord. A command is also given to the Jews among all nations, to prepare to return to Jerusalem in Palestine, and to re build that city and temple unto the Lord. Thus, America and Jerusalem are set forth as two places of gathering for the nations, and they may escape the judgments about to overtake the world, as the prophets have testified, that in Mount Zion and in Jerusalem shall be deliverance. (Times and Seasons, Vol.6, p.1067)

John Taylor:
    It may be proper here to remark, that there will be two places of gathering, or Zion; the one in Jerusalem, the other in another place; the one is a place where the Jews will gather to, and the other a mixed multitude of all nations. (The Government of God, Ch.11)

Lorenzo Snow:
    There will be a universal gathering to America and Palestine. Mormonism teaches that prior to the Millennial reign of peace, there is to be a universal gathering of scattered Israel, the lineal descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob; meaning not only the Jews, but also the "lost tribes" and such of the chosen seed as have for generations been mixed with other peoples. This gathering, which includes the converted Gentiles, is preliminary to the glorious advent of the King of kings, and the resurrection of those who are Christ's at His coming. The places of assembly are America and Palestine; the former taking chronological precedence as the gathering places of “Ephraim and his fellows,” while the "dispersed of Judah" will migrate to and rebuild Jerusalem. Here, upon the American continent, will be reared Zion, a New Jerusalem, where the Saints will eventually assemble and prepare for the coming of the Messiah. (Teachings of Lorenzo Snow, p.153)

Joseph Fielding Smith:
    In the former dispensation, the gospel was first preached to the Jews and then, after they had rejected it, it was taken to the Gentiles. In the dispensation in which we live, the gospel was first taken to the Gentile nations, and scattered Israel other than the Jews were gathered out; and after being preached among the Gentile nations, it shall go to the Jews, the first being last and the last being first, as the Savior promised.
    In section 45 of the Doctrine and Covenants, the Lord calls attention to the fact that when the fulness of the Gentiles should come in, a light should break forth among those that sat in darkness, and it should be the fulness of the everlasting gospel, but they would reject it. And in that generation shall the time of the Gentiles be fulfilled. In the 133rd section of the Doctrine and Covenants, he warns all the tribes of Israel to flee to the mountains of Ephraim for safety, and for the Jews to flee to Jerusalem. (Doctrines of Salvation, 3:259)


D&C 109:51-67 – Bruce reviewed these verses with us.

(Doctrine and Covenants 109:51-67.)

 

51 But if they will not, make bare thine arm, O Lord, and redeem that which thou didst appoint a Zion unto thy people.

 

52 And if it cannot be otherwise, that the cause of thy people may not fail before thee may thine anger be kindled, and thine indignation fall upon them, that they may be wasted away, both root and branch, from under heaven;

 

53 But inasmuch as they will repent, thou art gracious and merciful, and wilt turn away thy wrath when thou lookest upon the face of thine Anointed.

 

54 Have mercy, O Lord, upon all the nations of the earth; have mercy upon the rulers of our land; may those principles, which were so honorably and nobly defended, namely, the Constitution of our land, by our fathers, be established forever.

 

55 Remember the kings, the princes, the nobles, and the great ones of the earth, and all people, and the churches, all the poor, the needy, and afflicted ones of the earth;

 

56 That their hearts may be softened when thy servants shall go out from thy house, O Jehovah, to bear testimony of thy name; that their prejudices may give way before the truth, and thy people may obtain favor in the sight of all;

 

57 That all the ends of the earth may know that we, thy servants, have heard thy voice, and that thou hast sent us;

 

58 That from among all these, thy servants, the sons of Jacob, may gather out the righteous to build a holy city to thy name, as thou hast commanded them.

 

59 We ask thee to appoint unto Zion other stakes besides this one which thou hast appointed, that the gathering of thy people may roll on in great power and majesty, that thy work may be cut short in righteousness.

 

60 Now these words, O Lord, we have spoken before thee, concerning the revelations and commandments which thou hast given unto us, who are identified with the Gentiles.

 

61 But thou knowest that thou hast a great love for the children of Jacob, who have been scattered upon the mountains for a long time, in a cloudy and dark day.

 

62 We therefore ask thee to have mercy upon the children of Jacob, that Jerusalem, from this hour, may begin to be redeemed;

 

63 And the yoke of bondage may begin to be broken off from the house of David;

 

64 And the children of Judah may begin to return to the lands which thou didst give to Abraham, their father.

 

65 And cause that the remnants of Jacob, who have been cursed and smitten because of their transgression, be converted from their wild and savage condition to the fulness of the everlasting gospel;

 

66 That they may lay down their weapons of bloodshed, and cease their rebellions.

 

67 And may all the scattered remnants of Israel, who have been driven to the ends of the earth, come to a knowledge of the truth, believe in the Messiah, and be redeemed from oppression, and rejoice before thee.

 

“Keys of the Kingdom” – President Wilford Woodruff, April, 2004 Ensign

“Finding Safety in Counsel” – Elder Eyring May, 1997 Ensign

 

Finding Safety in Counsel

Elder Henry B. Eyring
Of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles
Ensign, May 1997, pp. 24-26

[Underlining is NOT original]

The Savior has always been the protector of those who would accept His protection. He has said more than once, "How oft would I have gathered you as a hen gathereth her chickens, and ye would not" (3 Ne. 10:5).

The Lord expressed the same lament in our own dispensation after describing the many ways in which He calls us to safety:

"How oft have I called upon you by the mouth of my servants, and by the ministering of angels, and by mine own voice, and by the voice of thunderings, and by the voice of lightnings, and by the voice of tempests, and by the voice of earthquakes, and great hailstorms, and by the voice of famines and pestilences of every kind, and by the great sound of a trump, and by the voice of judgment, and by the voice of mercy all the day long, and by the voice of glory and honor and the riches of eternal life, and would have saved you with an everlasting salvation, but ye would not!" (D&C 43:25).

There seems to be no end to the Savior's desire to lead us to safety. And there is constancy in the way He shows us the path. He calls by more than one means so that it will reach those willing to accept it. And those means always include sending the message by the mouths of His prophets whenever people have qualified to have the prophets of God among them. Those authorized servants are always charged with warning the people, telling them the way to safety.

When tensions ran high in northern Missouri in the fall of 1838, the Prophet Joseph Smith called for all the Saints to gather to Far West for protection. Many were on isolated farms or in scattered settlements. He specifically counseled Jacob Haun, founder of a small settlement called Haun's Mill. A record of that time includes this: "Brother Joseph had sent word by Haun, who owned the mill, to inform the brethren who were living there to leave and come to Far West, but Mr. Haun did not deliver the message" (Philo Dibble, in "Early Scenes in Church History," in Four Faith Promoting Classics [1968], 90). Later, the Prophet Joseph recorded in his history: "Up to this day God had given me wisdom to save the people who took counsel. None had ever been killed who [had abided] by my counsel" (History of the Church, 5:137). Then the Prophet recorded the sad truth that innocent lives could have been saved at Haun's Mill had his counsel been received and followed.

In our own time, we have been warned with counsel of where to find safety from sin and from sorrow. One of the keys to recognizing those warnings is that they are repeatedFor instance, more than once in these general conferences, you have heard our prophet say that he would quote a preceding prophet and would therefore be a second witness and sometimes even a third. Each of us who has listened has heard President Kimball give counsel on the importance of a mother in the home and then heard President Benson quote him, and we have heard President Hinckley quote them both. The Apostle Paul wrote that "in the mouth of two or three witnesses shall every word be established" (2 Cor. 13:1). One of the ways we may know that the warning is from the Lord is that the law of witnesses, authorized witnesses, has been invokedWhen the words of prophets seem repetitive, that should rivet our attention and fill our hearts with gratitude to live in such a blessed time.

Looking for the path to safety in the counsel of prophets makes sense to those with strong faithWhen a prophet speaks, those with little faith may think that they hear only a wise man giving good adviceThen if his counsel seems comfortable and reasonable, squaring with what they want to do, they take itIf it does not, they consider it either faulty advice or they see their circumstances as justifying their being an exception to the counselThose without faith may think that they hear only men seeking to exert influence for some selfish motive. They may mock and deride, as did a man named Korihor, with these words recorded in the Book of Mormon:

"And thus ye lead away this people after the foolish traditions of your fathers, and according to your own desires; and ye keep them down, even as it were in bondage, that ye may glut yourselves with the labors of their hands, that they durst not look up with boldness, and that they durst not enjoy their rights and privileges" (Alma 30:27).

Korihor was arguing, as men and women have falsely argued from the beginning of time, that to take counsel from the servants of God is to surrender God-given rights of independence. But the argument is false because it misrepresents reality. When we reject the counsel which comes from God, we do not choose to be independent of outside influence. We choose another influence. We reject the protection of a perfectly loving, all-powerful, all-knowing Father in Heaven, whose whole purpose, as that of His Beloved Son, is to give us eternal life, to give us all that He has, and to bring us home again in families to the arms of His love. In rejecting His counsel, we choose the influence of another power, whose purpose is to make us miserable and whose motive is hatred. We have moral agency as a gift of God. Rather than the right to choose to be free of influence, it is the inalienable right to submit ourselves to whichever of those powers we choose.

Another fallacy is to believe that the choice to accept or not accept the counsel of prophets is no more than deciding whether to accept good advice and gain its benefits or to stay where we are. But the choice not to take prophetic counsel changes the very ground upon which we stand. It becomes more dangerous. The failure to take prophetic counsel lessens our power to take inspired counsel in the future. The best time to have decided to help Noah build the ark was the first time he asked. Each time he asked after that, each failure to respond would have lessened sensitivity to the Spirit. And so each time his request would have seemed more foolish, until the rain came. And then it was too late.

Every time in my life when I have chosen to delay following inspired counsel or decided that I was an exception, I came to know that I had put myself in harm's wayEvery time that I have listened to the counsel of prophets, felt it confirmed in prayer, and then followed it, I have found that I moved toward safety. Along the path, I have found that the way had been prepared for me and the rough places made smooth. God led me to safety along a path which was prepared with loving care, sometimes prepared long before.

The account at the beginning of the Book of Mormon is of a prophet of God, Lehi. He was also the leader of a family. He was warned by God to take those he loved to safety. Lehi's experience is a type of what happens as God gives counsel through His servants. Of Lehi's family, only those who had faith and who themselves received confirming revelation saw both the danger and the way to safety. For those without faith, the move into the wilderness seemed not only foolish but dangerous. Like all prophets, Lehi, to his dying day, tried to show his family where safety would lie for them.

He knew that the Savior holds responsible those to whom He delegates priesthood keysWith those keys comes the power to give counsel that will show us the way to safetyThose with keys are responsible to warn even when their counsel might not be followed.Keys are delegated down a line which passes from the prophet through those responsible for ever smaller groups of members, closer and closer to families and to individuals. That is one of the ways by which the Lord makes a stake a place of safety. For instance, I have sat with my wife in a meeting of parents called by our bishop, our neighbor, so that he could warn us of spiritual dangers faced by our children.

I heard more than the voice of my wise friend. I heard a servant of Jesus Christ, with keys, meeting his responsibility to warn and passing to us, the parents, the responsibility to act. When we honor the keys of that priesthood channel by listening and giving heed, we tie ourselves to a lifeline which will not fail us in any storm.

Our Heavenly Father loves us. He sent His Only Begotten Son to be our Savior. He knew that in mortality we would be in grave danger, the worst of it from the temptations of a terrible adversary. That is one of the reasons why the Savior has provided priesthood keys so that those with ears to hear and faith to obey could go to places of safety.

Having listening ears requires humility. You remember the Lord's warning to Thomas B. Marsh. He was then the President of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles. The Lord knew that President Marsh and his brethren of the Twelve would be tested. He gave counsel about taking counsel. The Lord said, "Be thou humble; and the Lord thy God shall lead thee by the hand, and give thee answer to thy prayers" (D&C 112:10).

The Lord added a warning that is applicable to any who follow a living prophet: "Exalt not yourselves; rebel not against my servant Joseph; for verily I say unto you, I am with him, and my hand shall be over him; and the keys which I have given unto him, and also to youward, shall not be taken from him till I come" (D&C 112:15).

God offers us counsel not just for our own safety, but for the safety of His other children, whom we should love. There are few comforts so sweet as to know that we have been an instrument in the hands of God in leading someone else to safety. That blessing generally requires the faith to follow counsel when it is hard to do. An example from Church history is that of Reddick Newton Allred. He was one of the rescue party sent out by Brigham Young to bring in the Willie and Martin Handcart Companies. When a terrible storm hit, Captain Grant, captain of the rescue party, decided to leave some of the wagons by the Sweetwater River as he pressed ahead to find the handcart companies. With the blizzards howling and the weather becoming life-threatening, two of the men left behind at the Sweetwater decided that it was foolish to stay. They thought that either the handcart companies had wintered over somewhere or had perished. They decided to return to the Salt Lake Valley and tried to persuade everyone else to do the same.

Reddick Allred refused to budge. Brigham had sent them out and his priesthood leader had told him to wait there. The others took several wagons, all filled with needed supplies, and started back. Even more tragic, each wagon they met coming out from Salt Lake they turned back as well. They turned back 77 wagons, returning all the way to Little Mountain, where President Young learned what was happening and turned them around again. When the Willie Company was finally found, and had made that heartrending pull up and over Rocky Ridge, it was Reddick Allred and his wagons that waited for them. (See Rebecca Bartholomew and Leonard J. Arrington, Rescue of the 1856 Handcart Companies [1992], 29, 33-34.)

In this conference you will hear inspired counsel, for instance, to reach out to the new members of the Church. Those with the faith of Reddick Newton Allred will keep offering friendship even when it seems not to be needed or to have no effect. They will persist. When some new member reaches the point of spiritual exhaustion, they will be there offering kind words and fellowship. They will then feel the same divine approval Brother Allred felt when he saw those handcart pioneers struggling toward him, knowing he could offer them safety because he had followed counsel when it was hard to do.

While the record does not prove it, I am confident that Brother Allred prayed while he waited. I am confident that his prayers were answered. He then knew that the counsel to stand fast was from God. We must pray to know that. I promise you answers to such prayers of faith.

Sometimes we will receive counsel that we cannot understand or that seems not to apply to us, even after careful prayer and thoughtDon't discard the counsel, but hold it close. If someone you trusted handed you what appeared to be nothing more than sand with the promise that it contained gold, you might wisely hold it in your hand awhile, shaking it gently. Every time I have done that with counsel from a prophet, after a time the gold flakes have begun to appear and I have been grateful.

We are blessed to live in a time when the priesthood keys are on the earth. We are blessed to know where to look and how to listen for the voice that will fulfill the promise of the Lord that He will gather us to safety. I pray for you and for me that we will have humble hearts, that we will listen, that we will pray, that we will wait for the deliverance of the Lord which is sure to come as we are faithful. I testify that God, our Heavenly Father, lives and loves us. This is the Church of Jesus Christ. He lives and loves us. He is the head of the Church, and He is our Savior. I testify that Gordon B. Hinckley holds all the keys of the priesthood of God. In the name of Jesus Christ, amen.

President George Q. Cannon:

There seems to be no end to the Savior's desire to lead us to safety. And there is constancy in the way He shows us the path. He calls by more than one means so that it will reach those willing to accept it. And those means always include sending the message by the mouths of His prophets whenever people have qualified to have the prophets of God among them. Those authorized servants are always charged with warning the people, telling them the way to safety.

When tensions ran high in northern Missouri in the fall of 1838, the Prophet Joseph Smith called for all the Saints to gather to Far West for protection. Many were on isolated farms or in scattered settlements. He specifically counseled Jacob Haun, founder of a small settlement called Haun's Mill. A record of that time includes this: "Brother Joseph had sent word by Haun, who owned the mill, to inform the brethren who were living there to leave and come to Far West, but Mr. Haun did not deliver the message" (Philo Dibble, in "Early Scenes in Church History," in Four Faith Promoting Classics [1968], 90). Later, the Prophet Joseph recorded in his history: "Up to this day God had given me wisdom to save the people who took counsel. None had ever been killed who [had abided] by my counsel" (History of the Church, 5:137). Then the Prophet recorded the sad truth that innocent lives could have been saved at Haun's Mill had his counsel been received and followed.

In our own time, we have been warned with counsel of where to find safety from sin and from sorrow. One of the keys to recognizing those warnings is that they are repeatedFor instance, more than once in these general conferences, you have heard our prophet say that he would quote a preceding prophet and would therefore be a second witness and sometimes even a third. Each of us who has listened has heard President Kimball give counsel on the importance of a mother in the home and then heard President Benson quote him, and we have heard President Hinckley quote them both. The Apostle Paul wrote that "in the mouth of two or three witnesses shall every word be established" (2 Cor. 13:1). One of the ways we may know that the warning is from the Lord is that the law of witnesses, authorized witnesses, has been invokedWhen the words of prophets seem repetitive, that should rivet our attention and fill our hearts with gratitude to live in such a blessed time.

 Binding Satan in homes, By the Saints refusing to be led by the influences of Satan and not yielding to his seductive temptations, he is virtually bound so far as they are concerned; and, when the head of the family can attain unto this power and persuade his wife and family to do likewise, the power of Satan will be bound in that habitation, and the Millennium will have commenced in that household; and, if all should take this course, man and the earth would soon be prepared for the coming of Jesus and the ushering in of the full millennial glory and the complete binding of Satan, all of which glory they would already have a foretaste. (July 17, 1863, MS 26:514)

(George Q. Cannon, Gospel Truth: Discourses and Writings of President George Q. Cannon, selected, arranged, and edited by Jerreld L. Newquist [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1987], 69.)
 
 
 
 

Doctrinal Teachings in Nauvoo

 

April 15, 2004

 

 

 

Doctrinal Development of the Church During the Nauvoo Sojourn, 1839-1846

by T. Edgar Lyon , BYU Studies, vol. 15 (1974-1975), Number 4 - Summer 1975

 

Those familiar with the history of the rise and expansion of the latter-day restoration movement are aware that Joseph Smith's life from the early 1820s until the settlement at Nauvoo was characterized by frequent movings, economic disasters, mob violence, and in 1838-1839, the expulsion of most of the members of the Church from Missouri. The five year period during which Joseph Smith resided at Nauvoo was different. It is true that on three different occasions attempts were made either to kidnap and transport him to Missouri, or to have him legally extradited to stand trial on one or more charges of violating Missouri laws. However, these attempts were disposed of through legal channels, proving more troublesome than dangerous. In addition, at Nauvoo threats of vexatious lawsuits or conspiracies had forced him to remain aloof from the Saints and curtail his public appearances for short periods of time until the threats had passed, but for the most part of a year or two at Nauvoo Joseph Smith experienced a greater freedom than he had known for the previous ten years. He was nearly always able to walk the streets of the city, night or day, to drive into the country, or to visit distant cities or branches of the Church, confident that his safety was assured. One reason for this was his awareness that Nauvoo, the largest city in Illinois, was filled with thousands of loyal Latter-day Saints who would have risked their lives if need be to protect him. Among these were hundreds of courageous men who would leave their work at a moment's notice to defend him or to travel with him as body guards.

 

Another reason for his assurance of safety was the fact that the Nauvoo Charter had set up an independent body of militia, with compulsory enrollment provided for all able-bodied men within the commonly accepted ages of military service. This body, with detachments located in outlying communities and across the river in Iowa, numbered approximately 2,000, and Joseph Smith was the commanding lieutenant general. There was no other body of militia of this size in the state, and it outnumbered all the other militia groups in Hancock County combined. Knowing the Legion and the loyalty of the individual members to him were deterrents against anyone or any group of men entering Nauvoo to harass him or the Saints gave Joseph the confidence of being among friends who could provide more than enough support to guarantee his protection in any situation.

 

It must be remembered that although Nauvoo had been divided into wards, and the number increased as the city grew, there were no plans to construct what we presently know as ward meetinghouses or chapels. The "regular" meetings were outdoor, city-wide affairs. The Nauvoo wards were essentially ecclesiastical units of the city for organizing Church economics, settling local disputes, and caring for the needy. During inclement weather some of the bishops arranged to hold sacrament and testimony meetings in school rooms, public buildings, or large houses where the ward members could meet, but these were substitutes for the large city-wide public services which convened out of doors much of the year. Though these large meetings were usually designated as having been held in "The Grove," a number of open-air gathering places were used in Nauvoo, and the site shifted as the city grew, or the vicissitudes of the weather demanded.

 

By 1840 these meetings had become quite regular occurrences and were continued until the fall of 1845 when the lower floor of the temple had been sufficiently finished to allow meetings indoors, although on temporary seating. The Saints in the city, those on the Iowa side of the Mississippi, and those residing a few miles outside of Nauvoo, knew that unless the weather was very threatening, or it was extremely cold, a preaching meeting would convene about 10:00 A.M. each Sunday morning somewhere in Nauvoo, usually in the vicinity of the Nauvoo Temple. And from what soon became an established custom, the probability was high that Joseph Smith would be one of the speakers, if not the only one. What more capable or better preacher could they find in the Church than the Prophet who had been responsible for the restoration of the gospel? This situation of a large body of people, eager to be fed spiritual teachings, must have stimulated Joseph Smith to satisfy their longings.

 

A survey of the sermons preached by Joseph Smith at Nauvoo and some neighboring communities, as well as articles and epistles he sent to the Saints, indicates he made great use of the body of new scriptures he had made available to the Church. If we review his sermons and writings, we might figuratively say that he took a huge canvas and on it, as would a master artist, painted a panorama of the pre-mortal life of man and his progress to a mortal existence, in which his preexisting spirit was clothed in a mortal body. Then he presented glimpses of the disembodied state following death, the re-embodiment of the spirit and body through the resurrection, and the various estates attained in the degrees of exaltation or damnation. Up to the Nauvoo period, these gradations or phases of life in the totality of eternal existence had never been clearly defined. As the Prophet undertook to delineate relationships between these on-going phases of life into a coherent pattern, he refined LDS theology in several key areas: (1) Concepts of God and Man, (2) Man in the World, (3) Salvation for the Dead, (4) Eternal Nature of Priesthood Covenants, (5) Temple Ordinances for the Living, (6) Celestial and Plural Marriage, and (7) Eternal Progression. He also prepared the Wentworth Letter from which we have the Articles of Faith. All these doctrines were not presented at once, but came as the Saints proved they could accept and try to live them.

 

The Concepts of God and Man

 

The Lectures on Faith, published in the forepart of the 1835 edition of the Doctrine and Convenants, stated that there were two members of the Godhead, the Father and the Son.  The Father was defined as a personage of Spirit, and the Son as a personage of Tabernacle. The Lectures also stated the Father and Son possessed the same mind, and this mind was the Holy Ghost.

 

During the years between its publication in 1835 and the settlement of the Saints at Nauvoo, there had been some speculation concerning this statement among the Saints, especially after the publication of Joseph Smith's dictated account of the First Vision. At a conference held at Ramus, Illinois, on 2 April 1842, Joseph Smith vitiated the erroneous doctrine in the Lectures by declaring:

 

The Father has a body of flesh and bones as tangible as man's; the Son also; but the Holy Ghost has not a body of flesh and bones, but is a personage of Spirit. Were it not so, the Holy Ghost could not dwell in us.  (D&C 130:22)

 

After Joseph Smith's death, this later teaching was incorporated in the Doctrine and Convenants and became a foundation of  Mormon  theology. It marks a permanent theological landmark in the development of the doctrine of the Godhead among Latter-day Saints and in time contributed to the deletion of the Lectures on Faith from the Doctrine and Convenants. This doctrine has done much to clarify the understanding of the Saints and their relationships to their Eternal Father.

 

This relationship needed to be clearly understood because the great majority of the converts to the Church during the lifetime of Joseph Smith had been reared as Episcopalians, Methodists, Roman Catholics, Congregationalists, Baptists, members of the Reformed churches, "Campbellites" (reformed Baptists or Disciples of Christ), members of the Society of Friends (Quakers), as Unitarians, or Universalists. With the exception of the latter three, and the Methodists, all of them predicated their doctrines of salvation on one or more variations of predestination by God. The Episcopalians and Roman Catholics taught a less stringent version of predestination which upheld God's power to save or damn, but conceded that it was not an unchanging absolute. They believed God could change his earlier decision if something in the way a person lived had shown the first decree would have been unjust. The Calvinistic bodies of the day (Presbyterians, Congregationalists, Baptists, and the Reformed churches) accepted a doctrine of absolute predestination. Regardless of which of these absolute predestinarian doctrines one believed there was little a mortal could do to change the decree which God had already made for the elect. The Methodists alone maintained that man enjoyed a freedom of the will which would base salvation on personal righteousness.

 

In revelations to Joseph Smith, the Lord had stressed the importance of man's free will in accepting the salvation offered by the Savior. However, it was inevitable that converts would bring with them into the Church some of their former doctrines and that these would survive in their minds and color their thinking about salvation. At Nauvoo Joseph Smith preached sermons in which he gave a new dimension to the concept of man which apostate Christianity had lost . These sermons had their roots in the doctrine of preexistence. Very little had been written or printed on this subject in the first decade of the existence of the Church.  While the Bible and Book of Mormon have accounts which are now used to support the doctrine of a pre-earthly existence, little use was made of these verses by the Saints prior to the Nauvoo period.

 

The Book of Moses, which was further augmented by the teachings of the Book of Abraham, provided Joseph Smith with material by which he interpreted the relationship of mortals to God as one of true kinship. He taught that God the Father had created an eternal spirit which inhabited the body of every mortal on earth. Thus, we are actually children of God in a literal sense, being offspring of Deity. Hence, we have inherited from our creator-parent some of his capacities, just as we inherited certain characteristics from our earthly parents. Joseph Smith would not believe that a loving, just, and fair God would place his children on earth in a mortal body that was depraved and often damned before birth. Nor would he believe that God would have created spirit children and then damned them for eternity. No mortal parent would be so unjust. He rejected completely the timeworn errors of Christianity concerning mortal beings and their destiny.

 

Instead of teaching that man's nature was inclined toward anti-godly behavior, Joseph Smith taught that mortals could identify themselves as spirit children of a God who loved them and that they had the potential to become like their eternal parent. If they failed in this, it would be because of their own evil choices, whether by their willful disobedience of God's law, ignorance, or rebelliousness toward law and order.

 

Man in the World

 

Joseph Smith also clarified man's relationship to "worldly" activities during this period. Orthodox Protestantism in the 1830s and 40s condemned and forbade what were described as "worldly entertainments": dancing, operas, the theatre, girls playing with dolls, playing certain musical instruments, celebrating Christmas, and participating in similar recreational activities. The Prophet succeeded in changing the views of many of his followers who had been reared on such teachings. At Nauvoo we read of the Saints attending dinner-dances, participating in stage plays, singing Christmas carols, and playing in bands and orchestras. The Prophet taught that such things were not inherently evil. They were evil when an evil use was made of them. This released the Saints from old mores and gave them a new sense of freedom. It opened new avenues for finding refreshing diversion in activities many had been taught were the works of Satan. This made them identify themselves as children of God in reality, and feel a close kinship with their Eternal Father.

 

Salvation for the Dead

 

In the fall of 1840, Joseph Smith taught the doctrine of salvation for the dead.  D&C 124  of the Doctrine and Convenants, dated 19 January 1841, introduced the first scripture concerning this outreach of mortals to assist in making exaltation a possibility for their departed ancestors (see verses 27-33). The first step in this process consisted of a proxy baptism for their departed forebears. Such baptisms for the dead were at first performed in the Mississippi River at Nauvoo. As soon as the basement walls of the temple were laid, that portion was roofed over with a temporary covering and a wooden font, resting on twelve wooden oxen, was installed. River baptisms for the dead were then discontinued, according to instructions in  D&C 124.  At this early period there were few guidelines to follow. As a result people were baptized for both sexes of their ancestors. Toward the close of the Nauvoo period this was changed, and ordinance work for the dead could only be done for those of the same sex as the proxy worker.

 

Later a second step in the salvation for the dead consisted of the endowment ceremony being done through a living proxy. Due to the short period of time the Saints remained at Nauvoo after the endowment ceremonies were available in the temple, few if any complete ordinances for the dead were performed at that time, there being too many living people who desired these blessings. Some marriages of the dead for eternity were performed and other sealings accomplished, but this phase of temple work was little more than introduced to the Saints at Nauvoo.

 

The Eternity of Priesthood Covenants

 

The enduring power of the Melchizedek Priesthood ordinances was not realized by many in the early days of the Church. Joseph Smith interpreted this power to be much stronger and more enduring than a setting apart to office or an assignment in the Church. In D&C 84:38-40 it is stated that there is an oath and a covenant of the priesthood which God the Father cannot break. This was interpreted to mean that apostasy and even excommunication could not destroy the validity of such covenants. The blessings thereof can be lost and the priesthood authority made inoperative through Church discipline, but the priesthood itself is never obliterated. As a result, one who has received the Melchizedek Priesthood and is excommunicated, upon returning to the Church is not reordained to that priesthood, nor are endowments redone, neither is the marriage sealing repeated. These, then, by authority of the President of the Church, or through a member of the Council of the Twelve, are restored to the repentant member.

 

Temple Ordinances for the Living

 

During the early period of use of the Kirtland Temple for sacred ordinances, many of the Saints received what were often referred to as their "endowments." These consisted of preparatory ordinances commonly referred to as "washings and anointings."   D&C 124, received in Nauvoo in 1841, contained a commandment to the Church to erect a temple and provide facilities for ordinances for both living and dead, designed to save and exalt the recipients. It contained a promise of great blessings, but also a threat that if the Saints failed to complete the structure,    ". . . ye shall be rejected as a church, with your dead” (D&C 124:32).  Verses 40-42 contained the promise of great blessings if the Saints completed the temple:

 

And verily I say unto you, Let this house be built unto my name, that I may reveal mine ordinances therein unto my people;

 

For I deign to reveal unto my church, things which have been kept hid from before the foundations of the world, things that pertain to the dispensation of the fullness of times;

 

And I will show unto my servant Joseph all things pertaining to this house, and the Priesthood thereof, and the place where it shall be built.

 

According to these verses the Lord would give the Saints priesthood ordinances and blessings which had not been given in any prior dispensations because they ". . . pertain to the dispensation of the fullness of times." This promise must have served as the motivating force which encouraged the Saints to sacrifice their scanty means to further the construction of the Nauvoo Temple in the midst of adversity. The zeal with which the men worked, months after many of the Church leaders had commenced their westward journey, to complete and dedicate the Nauvoo Temple is evidence of their determination to be worthy of the blessings they had received therein, and to assure all the Saints that they and their Church had not been rejected by the Lord.

 

Before the temple was completed, Joseph Smith introduced the endowment ceremony to a select group on the second floor of his brick store in Nauvoo in May 1842. From then until near the close of his life, small groups of men and women were given their endowments at various places in Nauvoo. By late November 1845, the upper floor of the temple was nearing completion. Church records indicate as soon as the plasterers and painters had completed the attic story, the leading brethren and their wives provided drapes for the windows and installed canvas curtains which divided the main hall of the top floor into four rooms. The front part of the floor provided space for the dressing and washing and anointing rooms. The floors were covered with borrowed carpets which townspeople gladly supplied. The walls were decorated with borrowed painted portraits, landscapes, and mirrors. Potted plants and shrubs were hauled in the freezing weather from homes of the Saints to beautify the House of the Lord, thus creating a setting of tranquility and beauty for the rites of the temple. The Saints had been raising them in their houses after the cold weather set in.

 

On 11 December 1845, the first group of Saints participated in the endowment ceremonies in the temple. As soon as a sufficient number had been trained to conduct this work, sessions were held around the clock. The smallness of the quarters and the arrangement of the exits and entrances made it impossible for a second group to use the facilities until those of the first group had completed their rites. the endowment ceremonies taught the participants the meaning of the telestial, terrestrial, and celestial glories, as well as the blessings and obligations required of those who aspire to the highest degree of glory.

 

Following the endowment ceremonies many husbands and wives were sealed for eternity. Some whose spouses had died were sealed to their deceased companions. Many plural wives were sealed to their husbands. The plural wives of Joseph Smith were given a temple sealing which had been impossible at the time he had married them.  But a great number of sealings were not done at that time because of space limitations and the demand for the officiators to give endowments to the living. Likewise most of the sealing of children to parents was postponed to a later date, much of it being done in the Endowment House in Salt Lake City, commencing in 1855. The Nauvoo endowment and sealing books indicate that upwards of 5,000 Saints received the blessings the revelation had promised if they were obedient to the commandment of the Lord to complete his temple.

 

Celestial and Plural Marriage

 

As far back as 1832, according to Orson Pratt, Joseph Smith had told some of the brethren at Kirtland that in time plural marriage would become part of the doctrine and practice of the Church, because it was part of the restoration of the fullness of the gospel which had been promised, embracing the covenants God had made with Abraham.  Official Church records indicate the first plural marriage by the Latter-day Saints was performed at Nauvoo in 1841 when Joseph Bates Noble sealed Louisa Beaman to the Prophet Joseph.  As the members of the Council of the Twelve returned from their missions to Great Britain in 1841, Joseph Smith took them one by one and taught them the doctrine. Some had more difficulty than others in accepting it. Brigham Young and Heber C. Kimball mentioned the struggles they had.  At this time Orson Pratt became disillusioned with Joseph Smith and his rejection of the doctrine apparently was one of the reasons he and his wife were excommunicated from the Church at Nauvoo.  Through further study Elder Pratt became converted to the doctrine, and he and his wife were rebaptized and at the April Conference of 1843 Elder Pratt was reinstated in the Council of Twelve. In time he came to be the foremost expounder of the doctrine, delivering the first public address on the subject and publishing most of the early literature to explain why it was instituted as a practice of the Church. Although the doctrine was publically disavowed at Nauvoo and for six years after the Saints went West, many of the prominent men and women in the Church had entered into plural marriage in Nauvoo and started the long trek to the west with their families.

 

Eternal Progression

 

A corollary of the doctrines of free will and preexistence is found in the teachings of Joseph Smith which extended these doctrines into the realm of mortals having a potential to become gods. The Book of Abraham--the small new volume of scripture published by Joseph Smith at Nauvoo--showed how Abraham in the pre-mortal state had used his free will and intelligence to make him a great figure in the eyes of God. He had been chosen to become a great figure in mortality. This choosing was not a predestination, but a foreordination based on the right choices he made before coming to earth, and his wisely making the same choice of good during mortality.

 

The sealings and blessings of the endowment ceremony, coupled with the doctrine of marriage for time and eternity, including plural marriage, augmented by examples of great prophets such as Abraham, who had used their free agency wisely in the preexistence, formed the basis upon which Joseph Smith taught the doctrine of eternal progression. Through their God-given potential which the people on earth inherit from the Divine Father, it can become possible for some resurrected and exalted mortals to achieve the full potential of their divine inheritance and progress toward godhood. This would, of course, be a long and slow process whereby the married partners acquire the intelligence necessary to undertake and fulfill the responsibilities to become creators as the Eternal Father and the Son. It was in the"King Follett Discourse" given at the April Conference of the Church in 1844, at Nauvoo that the Prophet first described this ultimate potential of human beings.

 

The Articles of Faith

 

In the spring of 1842, Joseph Smith presented the first printed Articles of Faith. At the request of  John  Wentworth, a Chicago editor, the Prophet summarized some of the more salient points of the religion the Saints had embraced. The summary, intended for a non-Mormon audience, was never meant as a creed or a complete delineation of the gospel as believed by the Latter-day Saints. No doubt Joseph Smith sensed that if he listed all the ramifications of the gospel as it was being revealed, the array would become confusing and those who read it would not understand so many unfamiliar doctrines. For example, he did not mention such items as prayer, resurrection, and the sacrament of the Lord's Supper. It is possible that he thought all Christians would understand that such beliefs were common practices of all professing Christians. Neither did he mention salvation for the dead, endowments for the living and dead, the eternity of the marriage covenant, the three degrees of glory, sealings, eternal progression, or many others. Such new and strange doctrines could not possibly be understood by sectarian Christians in a few words. What he really did was list points of doctrine which were directed to the burning issues of the day, such as Unitarianism, Trinitarianism, Universalism, predestination, election by grace, necessity for Christian baptism, and other doctrines which were dividing Christianity into many small antagonistic factions.

 

Summary

 

When the Saints settled at Nauvoo in the spring of 1839, the organization and doctrines of the Church had made little progress beyond what had been taught at Kirtland, Ohio. Seven years later as Brigham Young and the Saints commenced their journey toward the West, the Church had developed the concept of wards and bishoprics, both of which were unknown earlier. The Prophet's new interpretation of the Godhead made at Nauvoo, the concept of the eternity of the Melchizedek Priesthood and its covenants, the new volume of old scripture (Book of Abraham) were theirs; baptism for the dead and endowments and sealings for the living and the dead were all new foundation stones for their common faith. A new concept of personal identity with their God and Savior through the doctrine of preexistence and the sealing of children to parents in eternal family relationships were all part of the new teachings and practices of this last dispensation of the gospel. Eternal progression opened new vistas of mortals' greatest challenges.

 

It was the same Church organization which had been effected on 6 April 1830, but its outlook and visions of eternal worlds had given new and exciting meaning to the understanding of those who believed in their inspired Church leadership. This was the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints which President Brigham Young was to lead to the West, where the teachings of Joseph Smith could be perpetuated.

 

Dr. Lyon is associate director of the LDS Institute of Religion at the University of Utah, research historian of Nauvoo Restoration, Inc., and a member of the BYU Studies editorial board.

 

Discourses on the Holy Ghost and Lectures on Faith, Lecture 5, ed. N. B. Lundwall (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1959), pp. 134-41.

 

See Jonathan Edwards' "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God," as an example of apostate Christianity's view of man in the eyes of God.

 

Parley P. Pratt's Voice of Warning, the earliest and most widely circulated booklet of the early years of the Church's existence, which explains the teachings of the Restored Church, is practically silent on the subject. The index to the six volumes of the Times and Seasons has only one citation to the doctrine and that is in 1845.

 

Bruce R. McConkie, s.v. "Restoration of Former Blessings,” Mormon Doctrine (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1958), p. 570.

 

Dean C. Jessee, "The Kirtland Diary of Wilford Woodruff," BYU Studie 12 (Summer 1972) :365-99.

 

See record in "Nauvoo Temple Sealings, Book A," Church Historical Department .

 

Orson Pratt, "Discourse on Celestial Marriage," in The Bible and Polygamy (Salt Lake City: Deseret News Steam Printing Establishment, 1877), p. 81.

 

Affidavits of Joseph Bates Noble, Church Historical Department. See also B. H. Roberts, A Comprehensive History of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University Press, 1965 ), 2:101-02.

 

See an account of Heber C. Kimball's first contacts with polygamy in Stanley B. Kimball, "Heber C. Kimball and Family, The Nauvoo Years," in this issue of BYU Studies.

 

T. Edgar Lyon, "Orson Pratt--Early  Mormon  Leader," (Master's diss., University of Chicago, 1932), pp. 34-42. See also Brigham Young's Journal, 8 and 20 August 1842.

 

See Roberts, Comprehensive History 2:103-05 and 6:55-58.

 

Joseph Smith, Jr., History of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints ed. B. H. Roberts (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1971), 6:302-17. This sermon was deleted from the original printing of 1912, after the book had been printed. It was reinserted when these volumes were reproduced in the l950s by photo-offset printing.

 

BYU Studies, Volume 15--1974-1975

 

New York – Faith, Repentance, Baptism, Keys of Aaronic Priesthood (Baptism, Sacrament), Melchizedek Priesthood – Gift of the Holy Ghost, Missionary Work, Printing Scripture (B of M), Church Administration.

 

Ohio – Receiving further revelations. Temple keys but not temple ordinances (D&C 110), Washing and Anointing were taught but it was NOT an ordinance, Joseph knew he had the RIGHT to receive further revelation in order to receive further authority (ordinances).

 

Nauvoo – June 27, 1839 was the 1st discourse given by Joseph when he taught the doctrine of having your calling and election.  After receiving the 1st ordinances of the gospel let him continue to: Humble himself

 

Hunger and Thirst after righteousness

 

(3 Nephi 12:6.)

 

6 And blessed are all they who do hunger and thirst after righteousness, for they shall be filled with the Holy Ghost.

 

Living by EVERY word of God

 

The Lord will say you are exalted.  After the Lord has proven him thoroughly, that they are determined to serve God at all HAZARDS, and then he will have his calling and election made sure.

 

Joseph Smith on the Doctrine of
Calling and Election Made Sure

The Following are extracted from Sermons given by the Prophet Joseph Smith
Concerning the Doctrine of Calling and Election Made Sure

The Prophet's Instruction on Various Doctrines
June 27, 1839
History of the Church, 3:379-381

THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. St. Paul exhorts us to make our calling and election sure. This is the sealing power spoken of by Paul in other places.

"13. In whom ye also trusted, that after ye heard the word of truth, the Gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that Holy Spirit of promise,

"14. Which is the earnest of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession, unto the praise of His glory, that we may be sealed up unto the day of redemption."--Ephesians, 1st chapter.

This principle ought (in its proper place) to be taught, for God hath not revealed anything to Joseph, but what He will make known unto the Twelve, and even the least Saint may know all things as fast as he is able to bear them, for the day must come when no man need say to his neighbor, Know ye the Lord; for all shall know Him (who remain) from the least to the greatest. How is this to be done? It is to be done by this sealing power, and the other Comforter spoken of, which will be manifest by revelation.

There are two Comforters spoken of. One is the Holy Ghost, the same as given on the day of Pentecost, and that all Saints receive after faith, repentance, and baptism. This first Comforter or Holy Ghost has no other effect than pure intelligence. It is more powerful in expanding the mind, enlightening the understanding, and storing the intellect with present knowledge, of a man who is of the literal seed of Abraham, than one that is a Gentile, though it may not have half as much visible effect upon the body; for as the Holy Ghost falls upon one of the literal seed of Abraham, it is calm and serene; and his whole soul and body are only exercised by the pure spirit of intelligence; while the effect of the Holy Ghost upon a Gentile, is to purge out the old blood, and make him actually of the seed of Abraham. That man that has none of the blood of Abraham (naturally) must have a new creation by the Holy Ghost. In such a case, there may be more of a powerful effect upon the body, and visible to the eye, than upon an Israelite, while the Israelite at first might be far before the Gentile in pure intelligence.

The other Comforter spoken of is a subject of great interest, and perhaps understood by few of this generation. After a person has faith in Christ, repents of his sins, and is baptized for the remission of his sins and receives the Holy Ghost, (by the laying on of hands), which is the first Comforter, then let him continue to humble himself before God, hungering and thirsting after righteousness, and living by every word of God, and the Lord will soon say unto him, Son, thou shalt be exalted. When the Lord has thoroughly proved him, and finds that the man is determined to serve Him at all hazards, then the man will find his calling and his election made sure, then it will be his privilege to receive the other Comforter, which the Lord hath promised the Saints, as is recorded in the testimony of St. John, in the 14th chapter, from the 12th to the 27th verses. . . .

Now what is this other Comforter? It is no more nor less that the Lord Jesus Christ Himself; and this is the sum and substance of the whole matter; that when any man obtains this last Comforter, he will have the personage of Jesus Christ to attend him, or appear unto him from time to time, and even He will manifest the Father unto him, and they will take up their abode with him, and the visions of the heavens will be opened unto him, and the Lord will teach him face to face, and he may have a perfect knowledge of the mysteries of the Kingdom of God; and this is the state and place the ancient Saints arrived at when they had such glorious visions--Isaiah, Ezekiel, John upon the Isle of Patmos, St. Paul in the three heavens, and all the Saints who held communion with the general assembly and Church of the First Born.

 

Salvation Through Knowledge
May 14, 1843
History of the Church, 5:387

It is not wisdom that we should have all knowledge at once presented before us; but that we should have a little at a time; then we can comprehend it. President Smith then read the 2nd Epistle of Peter, 1st chapter, 16th to last verses, and dwelt upon the 19th verse with some remarks.

Add to your faith knowledge, &c. The principle of knowledge is the principle of salvation. This principle can be comprehended by the faithful and diligent; and every one that does not obtain knowledge sufficient to be saved will be condemned. The principle of salvation is given us through the knowledge of Jesus Christ.

Salvation is nothing more nor less than to triumph over all our enemies and put them under our feet. And when we have power to put all enemies under our feet in this world, and a knowledge to triumph over all evil spirits in the world to come, then we are saved, as in the case of Jesus, who was to reign until He had put all enemies under His feet, and the last enemy was death.

Perhaps there are principles here that few men have thought of. No person can have this salvation except through a tabernacle.

Now, in this world, mankind are naturally selfish, ambitious and striving to excel one above another; yet some are willing to build up others as well as themselves. So in the other world there are a variety of spirits. Some seek to excel. And this was the case with Lucifer when he fell. He sought for things which were unlawful. Hence he was sent down, and it is said he drew many away with him; and the greatness of his punishment is that he shall not have a tabernacle. This is his punishment. So the devil, thinking to thwart the decree of God, by going up and down in the earth, seeking whom he may destroy --any person that he can find that will yield to him, he will bind him, and take possession of the body and reign there, glorying in it mightily, not caring that he had got merely a stolen body; and by-and-by some one having authority will come along and cast him out and restore the tabernacle to its rightful owner. The devil steals a tabernacle because he has not one of his own: but if he steals one, he is always liable to be turned out of doors.

Now, there is some grand secret here, and keys to unlock the subject. Notwithstanding the apostle exhorts them to add to their faith, virtue, knowledge, temperance, &c., yet he exhorts them to make their calling and election sure. And though they had heard an audible voice from heaven bearing testimony that Jesus was the Son of God, yet he says we have a more sure word of prophecy, whereunto ye do well that ye take heed as unto a light shining in a dark place. Now, wherein could they have a more sure word of prophecy than to hear the voice of God saying, This is my beloved Son, &c.

Now for the secret and grand key, Though they might hear the voice of God and know that Jesus was the Son of God, this would be no evidence that their election and calling was made sure, that they had part with Christ, and were joint heirs with Him. They then would want that more sure word of prophecy, that they were sealed in the heavens and had the promise of eternal life in the kingdom of God. Then, having this promise sealed unto them, it was an anchor to the soul, sure and steadfast. Though the thunders might roll and lightnings flash, and earthquakes bellow, and war gather thick around, yet this hope and knowledge would support the soul in every hour of trial, trouble and tribulation. Then knowledge through our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ is the grand key that unlocks the glories and mysteries of the kingdom of heaven.

Compare this principle once with Christendom at the present day, and where are they, with all their boasted religion, piety and sacredness while at the same time they are crying out against prophets, apostles, angels, revelations, prophesying and visions, &c. Why, they are just ripening for the damnation of hell. They will be damned, for they reject the most glorious principle of the Gospel of Jesus Christ and treat with disdain and trample under foot the key that unlocks the heavens and puts in our possession the glories of the celestial world. Yes, I say, such will be damned, with all their professed godliness. Then I would exhort you to go on and continue to call upon God until you make your calling and election sure for yourselves, by obtaining this more sure word of prophecy, and wait patiently for the promise until you obtain it, &c.
 

Remarks of the Prophet at Ramus--
Lives that are Hid with God in Christ--Importance of the Eternity of the Marriage Covenant
May 16, 1843
History of the Church, 5:391-392; cf. D&C 131

Your life is hid with Christ in God, and so are many others. Nothing but the unpardonable sin can prevent you from inheriting eternal life for you are sealed up by the power of the Priesthood unto eternal life, having taken the step necessary for that purpose

Except a man and his wife enter into an everlasting covenant and be married for eternity, while in this probation, by the power and authority of the Holy Priesthood, they will cease to increase when they die; that is, they will not have any children after the resurrection. But those who are married by the power and authority of the priesthood in this life, and continue without committing the sin against the Holy Ghost, will continue to increase and have children in the celestial glory. The unpardonable sin is to shed innocent blood, or be accessory thereto. All other sins will be visited with judgment in the flesh, and the spirit being delivered to the buffetings of Satan until the day of the Lord Jesus. The way I know in whom to confide--God tells me in whom I may place confidence.

In the celestial glory there are three heavens or degrees; and in order to obtain the highest, a man must enter into this order of the priesthood, [meaning the new and everlasting covenant of marriage;] and if he does not, he cannot obtain it. He may enter into the other, but that is the end of his kingdom: he cannot have an increase."
 

Items of Doctrine by the Prophet
May 17, 1843
History of the Church, Vol.5, Ch.20, p.392

 

At ten a. m. preached from 2nd Peter, 1st chapter and showed that knowledge is power; and the man who has the most knowledge has the greatest power.

Salvation means a man's being placed beyond the power of all his enemies.

The more sure word of prophecy means a man's knowing that he is sealed up into eternal life by revelation and the spirit of prophecy, through the power of the holy priesthood. It is impossible for a man to be saved in ignorance.

Paul saw the third heavens, and I more. Peter penned the most sublime language of any of the apostles.
 

We are tested to prove our LOYALTY to God.  Are we willing to SUBMIT to His will?  This shows an absence of pride.

 

N. Eldon Tanner, former member of the Quorum of the Twelve and First Presidency, once said: "It has ever been so; the chosen of the Lord must serve an apprenticeship in suffering even as Job, Paul, and Christ himself. (The Improvement Era, Aug. 1961, p.572).

 

To a gathering of priesthood brethren, President Cannon declared: "We have got to be watchful, for I tell you God has sent us here to test us and to prove us. We were true in keeping our first estate. The people that are here today stood loyally by God and by Jesus, and they did not flinch. If you had flinched then, you would not be here with the Priesthood upon you. The evidence that you were loyal, that you were true and that you did not waver is to be found in the fact that you have received the Gospel and the everlasting Priesthood.

"Now you are in your second estate, and you are going to be tested again. Will you be true and loyal to God with the curtain drawn between you and Him, shut out from His presence, and in the midst of darkness and temptation, with Satan and his invisible hosts all around you, bringing all manner of evil influences to bear upon you? The men and the women that will be loyal under these circumstances God will exalt, because it will be the highest test to which they can be subjected" (Gospel Truth, 1:7).

Bruce gave these quotes in a Gospel Doctrine lesson about the Book of Job:

The Book of Job
The story of Job is a test of loyalty. The book of Job "narrates the afflictions that befell a righteous man, and discusses the moral problem such sufferings present" (LDS Bible Dictionary, p. 713). The main moral question raised in the Book of Job is what is the cause of suffering. "The book of Job does not entirely answer the question as to why Job (or any human) might suffer pain and the loss of his goods. It does make it clear that affliction is not necessarily evidence that one has sinned. The book suggests that affliction, if not for punishment, may be for experience, discipline, and instruction" (LDS Bible Dictionary, p. 714).

Elder Jeffery R. Holland explained further: "In short, without opposites and alternatives, 'there would have been no purpose in the . . . creation [o human life].' (2 Nephi 2:12) All experiences in time and eternity would have been common, lifeless, indistinguishable-- 'a compound in one.' (2 Nephi 2:11) At the end of this sequence would be the worst realization of all. There could be no happiness because there was no sorrow, and there could be no righteousness because there was no sin. But fortunately, there are happiness, righteousness, eternal life, and God, even as Lehi stresses that those blessings come only at the risk of confronting misery, wickedness, death, and the devil. . . . So Adam and Eve willingly made a choice, choosing the path toward growth and godhood inherent in the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil over the potentially meaningless (at least at that point in their development) tree of life."

Elder Holland continued: "In doing so, Adam and Eve answered forever the plaintive question that is so often heard: 'If there is a God, why is there so much suffering in the world?' The answer to that is we now live in a fallen world filled with opposites, a world in which God is the most powerful but decidedly not the only spiritual influence. As part of the doctrine of opposition, Satan is also at work in the world, and we knew before we came here that he would bring grief and anguish with him. Nevertheless, we (through Adam and Eve) made the conscious choice to live in and endure this mortal sphere of opposition in all things, for only through such an experience was godly progress possible."

And now note this: "Adam and Eve--and we-- knowingly and lovingly absolved God of the responsibility for the 'thorns and thistles' of a fallen world that was personally chosen by us, not capriciously imposed by him. We wanted the chance to become like our heavenly parents, to face suffering and overcome it, to endure sorrow and still live rejoicingly, to confront good and evil and be strong enough to choose the good. In this telestial, mortal world filled with competing voices, enticements, and experiences, we get a lifetime of opportunity to refine and strengthen these virtues" (Christ and the New Covenant, Salt Lake City: Deseret, 1997, pp. 202-204; emphasis added).

Harold B. Lee once observed: "As I have labored among the brethren here and have studied the history of past dispensations, I have become aware that the Lord has given tests all down through time as to this matter of loyalty to the leadership of the Church. I go back into the scriptures and follow along in such stories as David's loyalty when the king was trying to take his life. He wouldn't defile the anointed of the Lord even when he could have taken his life. I have listened to the classic stories in this dispensation about how Brigham Young was tested, how Heber C. Kimball was tested, John Taylor and Willard Richards in Carthage Jail, Zion's Camp that received a great test, and from that number were chosen the first General Authorities in this dispensation. There were others who didn't pass the test of loyalty, and they fell from their places" (Conference Report, April 1950, p.101).

Tithing is one of these tests. Speaking of this, President Stephen L. Richards, former member of the Quorum of the Twelve and First Presidency, stated: "I feel certain that it is not only the test, the acid test, of true loyalty and devotion, but that it is likewise the greatest of the developers of true spiritual allegiance. It has been said that you can tell what a man thinks of a cause by the way he puts his money into it. Talk is cheap. It has never caused any particular wear and tear upon the jaw and they say that the tongue is the only organ of the body that never gives out, so that all our protestations by word of mouth are easily given, but when a man puts his hand down in his pocket and takes out the hard-earned money that comes from his labor, and devotes that to the establishment of a cause, you know without further evidence that he is sincere" (quoted in Marion G. Romney, Look to God and Live. Salt Lake City: Deseret, 1971, p. 154.)

D&C 112:23-26 – Thomas B. Marsh was given a warning, the earth will be cleansed before the coming of the Son of Man, and it will start with the righteous saints.

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 112:23-26.)

 

23 Verily, verily, I say unto you, darkness covereth the earth, and gross darkness the minds of the people, and all flesh has become corrupt before my face.

 

24 Behold, vengeance cometh speedily upon the inhabitants of the earth, a day of wrath, a day of burning, a day of desolation, of weeping, of mourning, and of lamentation; and as a whirlwind it shall come upon all the face of the earth, saith the Lord.

 

25 And upon my house shall it begin, and from my house shall it go forth, saith the Lord;

 

26 First among those among you, saith the Lord, who have professed to know my name and have not known me, and have blasphemed against me in the midst of my house, saith the Lord.

 

Section 112

 

Section 112 is another revelation to a priesthood president. It might be well to consider it in two lights: as counsel to a quorum president, and as instruction about the Quorum of the Twelve and First Presidency.

 

Verses 1-13 Counsel to a quorum president

 

 15-19, 30-34 The Twelve in relation to the First Presidency

 

 20 Universal counsel about the teachings of the First Presidency

 

 21-26 Conditions in the world and where the judgments will begin

 

In order to appreciate and fully understand this revelation it is necessary to understand the background. Members of the Church had established "a bank in real estate," the Kirtland Safety Society. Elder George A. Smith stated concerning it: "If they had followed the counsel of Joseph, there is not a doubt it would have been the leading bank in Ohio, probably of the nation. It was founded upon safe principles, and would have been a safe and lasting institution." fn But a spirit of apostasy gripped some of the leading elders of the Church, including some of the Kirtland Safety Society Officers. One hundred thousand dollars was stolen from the bank, unknown to the president or the cashier. Joseph Smith reported:

 

At this time the spirit of speculation in lands and property of all kinds, which was so prevalent throughout the nation, was taking root in the Church. As the fruits of this spirit, evil surmising, fault-finding, disunion, dissension, and apostasy followed in quick succession, and it seemed as though all the powers of earth and hell were combining their influence in an especial manner to over throw the Church at once, and make a final end. . . .

 

No quorum in the Church was entirely exempt from the influence of those false spirits who were striving against me for the mastery; even some of the Twelve were so far lost to their high and responsible calling as to begin to take sides, secretly, with the enemy. In this state of things, and but a few weeks before the Twelve were expecting to meet in full quorum, (some of them having been absent for some time), God revealed to me that something must be done for the salvation of His Church. And on or about the first of June, 1837, Heber C. Kimball, one of the Twelve, was set apart by the spirit of prophecy and revelation, prayer and laying on of hands, of the First Presidency, to Preside over a mission to England, to be the first foreign mission of the Church of Christ in the last days. fn

 

Elder Boyd K. Packer, in pointing out how at times the inspiration of the Lord "may either ignore or contravene the so-called facts concerning an issue," gave as an illustration this statement.

 

You remember at the time of Kirtland when the Prophet Joseph Smith was beleaguered on every side. He was harassed by those who should have supported him. In an incredible move he called around him those who were secure to him and whom he trusted and those who might have given him some protection and sent them away on missions to foreign lands. It was a move that certainly was not reasonable, and yet as the pages of history unfolded and the apostates had their day and left the Church, hundreds and thousands and tens of thousands of converts came forth to fill the ranks that had been abandoned by those who would not listen to the voice of the Prophet." fn

 

President Harold B. Lee spoke of the fruits of that same inspiration as follows:

 

In one year, 1840 to 1841—one year and fourteen days, to be exact—nine members of the Quorum of the Twelve were called to labor in the British Mission. If you remember the history here at home, those years marked the period of some of the severest persecution that the Church was to undergo in this dispensation. In that one year and fourteen days the nine members of the twelve, with their associates, established churches in every noted town and city in the kingdom of Great Britain. They baptized between 7000 and 8000 converts. They printed 5000 copies of the Book of Mormon, 3000 hymnbooks, 50,000 tracts, and they published 2500 volumes of the Millennial Star and emigrated 1000 souls to America. fn

 

While Elder Heber C. Kimball was on his mission in England, the Lord spoke to his quorum president, Thomas B. Marsh, in Kirtland, Ohio. Section 112 was received on the day that the gospel was first preached in England. fn President Joseph Fielding Smith noted that through the words of section 112 President Marsh "was instructed to teach the brethren of his council and point out to them their duties and responsibilities in proclaiming the Gospel. Some of the apostles had forsaken their responsibility and had turned their attention to schemes of speculation. . . . This revelation to Thomas Marsh was a warning and a call to him to bring his brethren back into the line of their duty as apostles of Jesus Christ. " fn

 

 

(Robert L. Millet and Kent P. Jackson, eds., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 1: The Doctrine and Covenants [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1989], 413.)

 

 

D&C 101:4-5 & President John Taylor’s quote:

 

 I speak of these things to show how men are to be tried. I heard Joseph Smith say—and I presume Brother Snow heard him also—in preaching to the Twelve in Nauvoo, that the Lord would get hold of their heart strings and wrench them, and that they would have to be tried as Abraham was tried. Well, some of the Twelve could not stand it. They faltered and fell by the way. It was not everybody that could stand what Abraham stood. And Joseph said that if God had known any other way whereby he could have touched Abraham's feelings more acutely and more keenly he would have done so. It was not only his parental feelings that were touched. There was something else besides. He had the promise that in him and in his seed all the nations of the earth should be blessed; that his seed should be multiplied as the stars of the heaven and as the sand upon the sea shore. He had looked forward through the vista of future ages and seen, by the spirit of revelation, myriads of his people rise up through whom God would convey intelligence, light and salvation to a world. But in being called upon to sacrifice his son it seemed as though all his prospects pertaining to posterity were to come to naught. But he had faith in God, and he fulfilled the thing that was required of him. Yet we cannot conceive of anything that could be more trying and more perplexing than the position in which he was placed.

 

(Journal of Discourses, 26 vols. [London: Latter-day Saints' Book Depot, 1854-1886], 24: 264 - 265.)

 

 

Genesis 22:1-2 – Abraham and the sacrifice of Isaac, the Lord commanded Abraham to perform a burnt offering, read Leviticus 1:5-13 of what that entailed.  It wasn’t a simple death of Isaac to fulfill the Lord’s command.  This was a wrenching of Abraham’s heart.

 

If I am not ready for the tests before me, then I am not ready for the millennium or the highest degree of the celestial kingdom.

 

Joseph warns the 12 of their individual tests, that the Lord is doing it for their own good.

 

The tests become more severe the higher the doctrine and ordinances are.

 

D&C 76:50-70 – These verses are describing the highest degree in the celestial kingdom; perhaps Joseph didn’t know this until D&C 131.  Heaven is graded, where do you want to go?

 

D&C 124:25-28, 37-39 – The fulness of the priesthood are temple ordinances.  You need further ordinances to move up the ladder in the celestial kingdom.  Baptism and the Gift of the Holy Ghost only get you into the front door.

 

The Red Brick store was used for the washing and anointing and the endowment (upper floor) the 2nd most sacred site next to the temple in Nauvoo.

 

Inauguration of Endowment Ceremonies.

 

 Wednesday, 4.—I spent the day in the upper part of the store, that is in my private office (so called because in that room I keep my sacred writings, translate ancient records, and receive revelations) and in my general business office, or lodge room (that is where the Masonic fraternity meet occasionally, for want of a better place) in council with General James Adams, of Springfield, Patriarch Hyrum Smith, Bishops Newel K. Whitney and George Miller, and President Brigham Young and Elders Heber C. Kimball and Willard Richards, instructing them in the principles and order of the Priesthood, attending to washings, anointings, endowments and the communication of keys pertaining to the Aaronic Priesthood, and so on to the highest order of the Melchisedek Priesthood, setting forth the order pertaining to the Ancient of Days, and all those plans and principles by which any one is enabled to secure the fullness of those blessings which have been prepared for the Church of the First Born, and come up and abide in the presence of the Eloheim in the eternal worlds. In this council was instituted the ancient order of things for the first time in these last days. And the communications I made to this council were of things spiritual, and to be received only by the I spiritual minded: and there was nothing made known to these men but what will be made known to all the Saints of the last days, so soon as they are prepared to receive, and a proper place is prepared to communicate them, even to the weakest of the Saints; therefore let the Saints be diligent in building the Temple, and all houses which they have been, or shall hereafter be, commanded of God to build; and wait their time with patience in all meekness, faith, perseverance unto the end, knowing assuredly that all these things referred to in this council are always governed by the principle of revelation.fn

 

Thursday, 5.—General Adams started for Springfield and the remainder of the council of yesterday continued their meeting at the same place, and myself and Brother Hyrum received in turn from the others, the same that I had communicated to them the day previous.

 

 

(Joseph Smith, History of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 7 vols., introduction and notes by B. H. Roberts [Salt Lake City: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 1932-1951], 5: 1 - 2.)

 

What was given to Adam in Adam ondi Ahman was restored in the Red Brick store on May 4, 1842?  This was the 1st time the ordinances were given in this generation.  The Kirtland Temple was prepatory for Nauvoo.

 

 

9 receive their endowment but 2 apostatized and were involved in the martyrdom in 1844.  The wives of these brethren received their endowments soon after.

 

 

Elden Jay Watson, ed., Manuscript History of Brigham Young, 1801-1844 (Salt Lake City: Smith Secretarial Service, 1968), p. 116. HC 5:1-2 omits William Law and Willima Marks from the list of men, which is in error as shown in the following sources: Heber C. Kimball 1840-1845 Journal, before the 1845 entries in a passage in a section titled "Strange Events": "June [sic] 1842 I was aniciated into the ancient order was washed and annointed and Sealled and ordained a Preast, and Soforth in company with nine others. Vis Josept Smith Hiram Smith Wm Law Wm Law Marks Judge Adams, Brigham Young, Willard Richards, George Miller-N K Whitney," and in Heber C. Kimball 1845-1846 Journal (21 December 1845), p. 159: "About 4 years ago next May [i.e., May 1842] nine persons were admitted into the Holy order 5 are now living--B. Young--W. Richards George Miller N. K. Whitney & H. C. Kimball two are dead [James Adams and Hyrum Smith], and two are worse than dead [the apostatized William Law and William Marks]." HC 5"1-2 also errs in stating that in May 1842 these men obtained "the hightest order of the Melchisedek Priesthood." This particular entry was not a quote from Joseph Smith's journal, which was not begun in the 1842 period until December 1842; the published HC entry appears instead to have been a reconstruction of the May 1842 event by the Church Historian several years later. It is clear from the organization of the Quorum of the Anointed on 28 September 1843 that the "highest order of the Melchisedek Preiesthood" cannot be obtained by men alone but must be obtained by men in connection with their wives through the ordinance of second anointing. See discussion below, fn 31, and D&C 131:1-4; 132:19

 

 

(Latter-Day Saint Prayer Circles Fn by D. Michael Quinn Fn, BYU Studies, vol. 19 (1978-1979), Number 1 - Fall 1978 105.)

 

 

 

Concerning Brother James Adams, it should appear strange that so good and so great a man was hated. The deceased ought never to have had an enemy. But so it was. Wherever light shone, it stirred up darkness. Truth and error, good and evil cannot be reconciled. Judge Adams had some enemies, but such a man ought not to have had one. I saw him first at Springfield, when on my way from Missouri to Washington. He sought me out when a stranger, took me to his home, encouraged and cheered me, and gave me money. He has been a most intimate friend. I anointed him to the patriarchal power—to receive the keys of knowledge and power, by revelation to himself. He has had revelations concerning his departure, and has gone to a more important work. When men are prepared, they are better off to go hence. Brother Adams has gone to open up a more effectual door for the dead. The spirits of the just are exalted to a greater and more glorious work; hence they are blessed in their departure to the world of spirits. Enveloped in flaming fire, they are not far from us, and know and understand our thoughts, feelings, and motions, and are often pained therewith.

 

 Flesh and blood cannot go there; but flesh and bones, quickened by the Spirit of God, can.

 

 If we would be sober and watch in fasting and prayer, God would turn away sickness from our midst.

 

 Hasten the work in the Temple, renew your exertions to forward all the work of the last days, and walk before the Lord in soberness and righteousness. Let the Elders and Saints do away with lightmindedness, and be sober. (Oct. 9, 1843.)

 

—DHC 6:50-52.

 

 

(Joseph Smith, Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, selected and arranged by Joseph Fielding Smith [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1976], 325.)

 

Joseph said that James Adams had his calling and election made sure.

 

The test we are in is a test of our feelings.

 

The revelation on Plural marriage was given in 1829 while Joseph and Oliver were translating the Book of Mormon, according to Brigham Young.  It wasn’t practiced until Nauvoo.  Oliver entered into the practice against Joseph’s wishes, pride before the fall.

 

The doctrine of plural marriage was probably revealed while Joseph Smith was working on his Inspired Revision of the Bible. The opening verses of the official revelation which set forth that doctrine indicated that he had some question on how God justified Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, David, and Solomon in having plural wives. See D&C 132:1-2. Joseph B. Noble, who performed the marriage ceremony when his wife's sister was given to Joseph Smith as a plural wife in 1841, stated "that the Prophet told him that the doctrine of celestial marriage was revealed to him while he was engaged on the work of translation of the scriptures."—MS, VL (July 16, 1883), p. 454. Joseph Smith spoke of his labor on his Inspired Revision of the Bible as a "work of translation."—D&C 45:60; 76:15.

 

Brigham Young is said to have stated that the doctrine of plural marriage was revealed when Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery "were translating the Book of Mormon."—Report of an address by President Young given in the Fourteenth Ward Meeting House, Salt Lake City, Utah, July 16, 1872, in the diary of Charles L. Walker, 1855-1905, under date. This report, however, is questionable. In another statement, Brigham Young said that Joseph Smith received the revelation on plural marriage "as early as in the year 1831."—Journal History, August 26, 1857. The Prophet translated the Book of Mormon in 1829, and he was working on his Inspired Revision of the Bible in 1831.

 

 

(Hyrum L. Andrus, Doctrines of the Kingdom [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1973], 489.)

 

 

The transgression of Oliver Cowdery was a case in point. Brigham Young explained that soon after the Prophet received the initial revelation on plural marriage he made known the principle to Oliver Cowdery "under a solemn pledge that he would not reveal it, nor act upon it, until the Lord otherwise commanded." But Oliver "did not keep his pledge, but acted upon it in a secret manner, and that was the cause of his overthrow." fn President Young reportedly quoted Oliver as saying: "Br. Joseph, why don't we go into the order of polygamy, and practice it as the ancients did. We know it is true, then why delay?" The Prophet replied: "I know that we know it is true and from God, but the time has not yet come." When this did not satisfy Cowdery, Joseph Smith said: "Oliver, if you go into this thing it is not with my faith or consent." But disregarding the warning, Cowdery "took to wife Miss Anne Lyman, cousin to Geo. A. Smith [and] from that time he went into [spiritual] darkness and lost the Spirit." fn

 

George Q. Cannon and George A. Smith, as counselors in the First Presidency, expressed the view that Oliver Cowdery's adulterous relationship was the root cause of his excommunication from the Church. President Cannon said: "He transgressed the law of God; he committed adultery; the Spirit of God withdrew from him, and he . . . was excommunicated from the Church." fn In referring to this case as "a grievous sin" by which Oliver Cowdery was under "condemnation," President Smith concluded: "The Lord will be honored by His people, and if they desire his blessings, they must not run before they are sent." fn

 

 

(Hyrum L. Andrus, Doctrines of the Kingdom [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1973], 468.)

 

 

William Law and Hyrum Smith taught there is no such teaching or practice as plural marriage in the church; Joseph had to pull them aside and explain the doctrine to them.  Hyrum accepted it but William Law did not and apostatized.

 

It took Joseph a year to overcome this.

 

We talked about John C. Bennett and Orson Pratt’s wife, Orson when he came home from his mission had a VERY difficult time with this.  He was excommunicated for a year and was mentally unstable for a time.

 

15 July 1842

 

1. See History of the Church, 5:60-61. Not in Teachings. The following account is most probably taken from the "Book of the Law of the Lord."

 

2. "I remember well the excitement which existed at the time," Ebenezer Robinson later reflected, "as a large number of the citizens turned out to go in search for [Orson Pratt]." Elder Pratt had been told that Joseph Smith wanted Orson's wife as his own plural wife and John C. Bennett was accused of having committed adultery with his wife. Both men denied these charges. "Under these circumstances his mind temporarily gave way and he wandered away, no one knew where… [The searchers] fearing lest he had committed suicide. He was found some 5 miles below Nauvoo, sitting on a rock, on the bank of the Mississippi river, without a hat" (Ebenezer Robinson, "Items of Personal History of the Editor," The Return, Vol. 2, No. 11 [November 1890]). Orson Pratt became more embittered towards the Prophet and a month later was excommunicated from the Church. In January 1843, however, he learned that he had made his judgment from information gained from a "wicked source." After a reconciliation with the Prophet and after the Church's move westward, Orson Pratt became the Church's expert spokesman for the doctrine of plural marriage, giving the first published discourse on the subject. Subsequently he was sent to Washington, D.C. to publish the reasons the Church advocated this principle. The title of his periodical, The Seer, demonstrated whom he ultimately believed regarding his earlier dilemma—Joseph the Seer.

 

 

(Joseph Smith, The Words of Joseph Smith: The Contemporary Accounts of the Nauvoo Discourses of the Prophet Joseph, compiled and edited by Andrew F. Ehat and Lyndon W. Cook [Provo: BYU Religious Studies Center, 1980], 146.)

 

 

Journal of Joseph Lee Robinson, pp. 13-14. When the Prophet still hesitated, the heavenly messenger finally appeared with a drawn sword and threatened his destruction if he did not institute the practice. Lightner, op. cit. Several testimonies support the fact that Joseph Smith said he received these ministrations. Hyrum Smith told Benjamin F. Johnson: "I know that Joseph was commanded to take more wives, and he waited until an angel with drawn sword stood before him and declared that if he longer delayed fulfilling that command that he would slay him."—Johnson to Gibbs, p. 13. Elder Johnson also signed an affidavit stating that Joseph Smith taught his (Johnson's) mother in his hearing "the doctrine of celestial marriage, declaring that an angel appeared unto him with a drawn sword, threatening to slay him if he did not proceed to fulfill the law that had been given to him."—Jenson, op. cit., p. 222. Helen Mar Whitney stated: "Joseph's own testimony was, that an angel was sent to command him to teach and to enter into this order. This angel, he states, stood over him with a drawn sword prepared to inflict the penalty of death if he should be disobedient."—Whitney, Plural Marriage As Taught By The Prophet Joseph, p. 13. See also, Whitney, Why We Practice Plural Marriage, p. 63.

(Hyrum L. Andrus, Doctrines of the Kingdom [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1973], 489.)

 

God’s culture is unlike anything we have on earth.

 

Joseph abhorred plural marriage but he had to live it and teach the principle, he was the Lords prophet and could not shirk his duty.

 

Emma knew it was true but had a very difficult time accepting the principle (understatement!!!).

 

She burned the original manuscript after Hyrum wrote it down, Joseph had other copies made.

 

 

Joseph had D&C 132 memorized.  The introduction was private; it didn’t become public until Salt Lake.  Orson Pratt was the one who first taught it in public.

 

Sometime after William's official introduction to plural marriage (July-August 1843) he found a sympathetic ear in Emma Smith. The deep sentiment of opposition to polygamy that each possessed singly was effectively multiplied as they mutually vented their feelings in private. Law's negative influence on Emma must have been significant because Joseph later stated that "all the sorrow he ever had in his family had arisen through the influence of Wm. Law" (Nauvoo Neighbor, Extra, 17 June 1844). Their conniving was vividly remembered by Newel K. Whitney in July 1844 when he reminded William Clayton that "Law & Emma [had been] in opposition to Joseph & the quorum" (Diary of William Clayton, 12 July 1844). Law's subsequent derogation of Emma Smith derived not from her general opposition to and sporadic denunciation of plural marriage, but her irrational ambivalence regarding the practice.

 

 

(William Law, Nauvoo Dissenter by Lyndon W. Cook Fn, BYU Studies, vol. 22 (1982), Number 1 - Fall 1982 .)

 

Technically, the revelation on eternal and plural marriage which was later published was not the one Joseph Smith dictated, but an exact copy of it. Towards evening on July 12, 1843, "Bishop Newel K. Whitney asked Joseph if he had any objections to his taking a copy of the revelation." When the Prophet consented, it "was carefully copied the following day by Joseph C. Kingsbury," who later testified that he made an exact copy which was carefully checked against the original. Shortly thereafter Emma Smith destroyed the original copy of the revelation. But the authenticated copy was carefully preserved by Bishop Whitney, who later gave it to President Brigham Young. This copy became the source of the published revelation on eternal and plural marriage. fn

 

The written copy was but "a portion of the revelation" which Joseph Smith had received. fn Having dictated it, he "remarked that there was much more that he could write, on the subject, but what was written was sufficient for the present." fn In stating that the Prophet gave him "lengthy instructions and information concerning the doctrine of celestial or plural marriage" when he first disclosed that doctrine, William Clayton added:

 

After the revelation on celestial marriage was written Joseph continued his instructions, privately, on the doctrine, to myself and others, and during the last year of his life we were scarcely ever together, alone, but he was talking on the subject, and explaining that doctrine and principles connected with it. He appeared to enjoy great liberty and freedom in his teachings, and also to find great relief in having a few to whom he could unbosom his feelings on that great and glorious subject. fn

 

 

(Hyrum L. Andrus, Doctrines of the Kingdom [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1973], 455 - 456.)

 

 

Bruce told the story of Heber and Vilate Kimball.

 

The Prophet's associates initially looked upon the doctrine of plural wives with a similar reaction. John Taylor recalled that "it was one of the greatest crosses that ever was taken up by any set of men since the world stood." fn "It was the first time in my life that I had desired the grave, and I could hardly get over it for a long time," Brigham Young declared. "When I saw a funeral, I felt to envy the corpse its situation, and to regret that I was not in the coffin." fn Likewise, when Heber C. Kimball heard the Prophet teach the doctrine of plural marriage, "he said the shock was similar to that of an earthquake." And when the latter-day Seer commanded Elder Kimball "to take another wife, if it had been his death sentence he could not have felt worse." fn

 

It was only after Elder Kimball was directed three times to practice plural marriage, and then commanded in the name of the Lord, that he obeyed. fn Having married Sarah Noon, an English convert, he wrote to his wife, Vilate, October 23, 1842, while on a mission in the southern part of Illinois: "My heart aches for you, and sometimes I can hardly speak without weeping and that before my brethren; for I have a broken heart and my head is a fountain of tears." fn Two days later he again wrote:

 

My feelings are of that kind that it makes me sick at heart, so that I have no appetite to eat. My temptations are so severe it seems sometimes as though I should have to lay down and die, I feel as if I must sink beneath it. I go into the woods every chance I have, and pour out my soul before God that he would deliver me and bless you my dear wife, and the first I would know I would be in tears weeping like a child about you and the situation that I am in; but what can I do but go ahead? My dear Vilate do not let it cast you down for the Lord is on our side; this I know from what I see and realize and I marvel at it many times. You are tried and tempted and I am sorry for you, for I know how to pity you. I can say that I never suffered more in all my life than since these things came to pass; and as I have said, so say I again, I have felt as if I should sink and die. Oh my God! I ask thee in the name of Jesus to bless my dear Vilate and comfort her heart and deliver her from temptation, and from all sorrow and open her eyes and let her see things as they are. fn

 

 

(Hyrum L. Andrus, Doctrines of the Kingdom [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1973], 472.)

 

 

 

When the Nauvoo Temple was completed, thousands of Saints received the blessing of being sealed at the holy altars of the temple.

 

The first to be tested in preparation for receiving these ordinances were Vilate and Heber C. Kimball.31 Heber and Vilate Kimball had already sacrificed their family, friends, homes, possessions, and, more important, a peaceful life, for the gospel. Nothing else was seemingly left to place on the altar, except their children and each other.

 

Then came to Heber and Vilate an Abrahamic test-something that was to them unthinkable. Joseph asked Heber to give Vilate to him as a wife. Heber, emotionally overwhelmed by the request, came home to wrestle with the request. He touched neither food nor water for three days and three nights and continually sought confirmation and comfort from God. On the evening of the third day, some kind of divine assurance came, and Heber and Vilate walked from their home to Joseph's store. Having placed her hand into the Prophet's, Heber and Vilate submitted their will to his.

 

Joseph wept at this act of faith, devotion, and obedience. The Prophet never intended to take Vilate from Heber-his request was only a test. Passing the test, Vilate and Heber were rewarded by being sealed for time and eternity by Joseph before they returned home.

 

 

(Richard Neitzel Holzapfel and Jeni Broberg Holzapfel, Women of Nauvoo [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1992],.)

 

Brigham Young, following his return from England, was informed of the revelation and commanded to take an additional wife. He recalled:

 

Some of these my brethren know what my feelings were at the time Joseph revealed the doctrine; I was not desirous of shrinking from any duty, nor of failing in the least to do as I was commanded, but it was the first time in my life that I had desired the grave, and I could hardly get over it for a long time. And when I saw a funeral, I felt to envy the corpse its situation, and to regret that I was not in the coffin.34

 

Heber C. Kimball was warned that he would lose his apostleship and was rebuked on three separate occasions before he accepted the revelation. Another Apostle, John Taylor, said the whole Quorum of the Twelve "seemed to put off as far as we could, what might be termed the evil day" when they would take plural wives. Despite these reactions, Joseph "clapped his hands and danced like a child," so relieved he was of not carrying the burden alone anymore.35

 

The practice was both difficult and against the Saints' Puritan traditions. Following the death of their father, sixteen-year-old Emily and twenty-year-old Eliza Partridge moved into the Smith home to assist Emma with the many duties surrounding her public and private life. During this time Joseph was sealed to the two sisters.

 

Emily recalled, "[We] were married to Brother Joseph about the same time, but neither of us knew about the other at the time; everything was so secret."36 Her sister remembered:

 

A woman living in polygamy dare not let it be known, and nothing but a firm desire to keep the commandments of the Lord could have induced a girl to marry in that way. I thought my trials were very severe in the line, and I am often led to wonder how it was that a person of my temperament could get along with it and not rebel; but I know it was the Lord who kept me from opposing his plans, although in my heart I felt that I could not submit to them. But I did and I am thankful to my Heavenly Father for the care he had over me in those troublous times.37

 

A few sources also indicate that some of the marriages were "for eternity only."38 Another obscure aspect of the plural marriages in Nauvoo was the practice of "sealing" a woman who was already civilly married to another man. For example, twenty-year-old Zina Diantha Huntington married Henry Jacobs 7 March 1841; later, on 27 October 1841, when Zina was sealed to Joseph Smith, Henry stood as a witness. Though married for eternity to Joseph, Zina continued to live with Henry in Nauvoo and bore him two children.39

 

In spite of the difficulties, some sister Saints became close to their sister wives. In many cases, living the principle often brought the first wife and her spouse closer together, as was demonstrated in Vilate and Heber Kimball's letters during this period.

 

Vilate sent her husband off on a mission in October 1842. She remained home in Nauvoo with Heber's first plural wife, Sarah Peak. Both women were pregnant at the time. In the letters between Heber and Vilate, and, in one case, Sarah added as postscript to one of Vilate's letters, an added dimension of concern and tenderness is shown.

 

To Vilate, Heber wrote, "I dream about you most every night, but always feel disappointed when I awake; behold, it is a dream, and I could cry if it would have done any good. I am quite a child some of the time." In closing the letter, Heber noted, "You [spoke] about if I had sent a kiss to you. I will send you several on the top of this page where those round marks are, no less than one dozen. I had the pleasure of receiving those that you sent. I can tell you it is a pleasure in some degree, but when I come home I will try the lump itself."40

 

Vilate noted a few days later, "Our good friend Sarah Peak, Heber's first wife, is as ever," and "we are one." Though harmony existed between the two sister-wives, Vilate admitted that the marital arrangement was stressful and difficult:

 

I sometimes felt tempted and tried and feel as though my burden was greater than I could bear; it would only be a source of sorrow to you, and the Lord knows that I do not wish to add one sorrow to your heart, for, be assured, my dear Heber, that I do not love you any the less for what has transpired, neither do I believe that you do me.41

 

Not all to whom Joseph Smith confided the doctrine accepted it and passed this test of obedience. Some apostatized and became bitter enemies of Joseph and the Church as a result, including Jane Law, the wife of Joseph's counselor in the First Presidency.

 

For the women involved in this test, many relied on their faith and personal dedication to the gospel to sustain themselves. Some asked not to be considered but remained faithful to the Church and its other principles. When Joseph revealed the doctrine to Sarah G. Kimball, she told Joseph "to go and teach it [to] someone else."42

 

As difficult as this may have been to the sister Saints who were invited to become a second wife, the first wife also struggled tremendously. Many women in Nauvoo who began to live the law with their husbands indicated that their decisions to move forward were based on personal revelation. Vilate Kimball, having watched her husband suffer from some unknown cause, received a vision that confirmed to her the rightness in accepting this test. How unique an experience this was for the sisters involved in Nauvoo is unknown, but Vilate was not the only one to receive special divine sanction.

 

 

(Richard Neitzel Holzapfel and Jeni Broberg Holzapfel, Women of Nauvoo [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1992],.)

 

 

 

 

 

Testing and Trials

 

April 22, 2004

 

 

 

Read President Wilford Woodruff “Keys to the Kingdom”

 

Gospel Classics:
The Keys of the Kingdom

By President Wilford Woodruff (1807–98)
Fourth President of the Church

 

Published in Millennial Star, 2 Sept. 1889, 545–49; subheads added; paragraphing altered; punctuation, capitalization, and spelling modernized.

Wilford Woodruff, “The Keys of the Kingdom,” Liahona, Apr. 2004, 41
Wilford Woodruff was born on 1 March 1807 in Connecticut to Aphek and Beulah Woodruff. Zera Pulsipher, an early Church missionary, baptized him on 31 December 1833 in an icy stream near Richland, New York. He was ordained an Apostle by Brigham Young on 26 April 1839 and became Church President on 7 April 1889. He died on 2 September 1898 in San Francisco, California. This is a portion of the remarks given by President Woodruff on 2 June 1889 at a YMMIA conference.

Before the close of this conference there is a subject upon which I wish to bear my testimony. … I am … the only one living in the flesh who was with … Joseph Smith, the Prophet of God, when he gave to the Twelve Apostles their charge concerning the priesthood and the keys of the kingdom of God; and as I myself shall soon pass away like other men, I want to leave my testimony to these Latter-day Saint[s].

News of the Martyrdom

I was sitting with Brigham Young in the depot in the city of Boston at the time when the two prophets [Joseph Smith and his brother Hyrum] were martyred. Of course we had no telegraphs and no fast reports as we have today to give communication over the land. During that period Brother Young was waiting there for a train of cars to go to Peterborough. Whilst sitting there we were overshadowed by a cloud of darkness and gloom as great as I ever witnessed in my life. … Neither of us knew or understood the cause until after the report of the death of the prophets was manifested to us. Brother Brigham left; I remained in Boston, and the next day took passage for Fox Islands, a place I had visited some years before, and baptized numbers of people and organized branches upon both those islands. My father-in-law, Ezra Carter, carried me on a wagon from Scarborough to Portland. I there engaged passage on board of a steamer. I had put my trunk on board and was just bidding my father-in-law farewell, when a man came out from a shop—a shoemaker—holding a newspaper in his hand. He said, “Father Carter, Joseph and Hyrum Smith have been martyred—they have been murdered in Carthage Jail!”

As soon as I looked at the paper, the Spirit said to me that it was true. I had no time for consultation, the steamer’s bell was ringing, so I stepped on board and took my trunk back to land. As I drew it off, the plank was drawn in. I told Father Carter to drive me back to Scarborough. I there took the car for Boston. …

Next day I met Brigham Young in the streets of Boston, he having just returned, opposite to Sister Voce’s house. We reached out our hands, but neither of us was able to speak a word. We walked into Sister Voce’s house. We each took a seat and [covered] our faces. We were overwhelmed with grief and our faces were soon bathed in a flood of tears. … After we had done weeping we began to converse together concerning the death of the prophets. In the course of the conversation, he smote his hand upon his thigh and said, “Thank God, the keys of the kingdom are here.” …

The Last Meeting

All that President Young or myself or any member of the Quorum need have done in the matter was to have referred to the last instructions at the last meeting we had with the Prophet Joseph before starting on our mission. I have alluded to that meeting many times in my life.

The Prophet Joseph, I am now satisfied, had a thorough presentiment that that was the last meeting we would hold together here in the flesh. We had had our endowments; we had had all the blessings sealed upon our heads that were ever given to the apostles or prophets on the face of the earth. On that occasion the Prophet Joseph rose up and said to us: “Brethren, I have desired to live to see this temple built. I shall never live to see it, but you will. I have sealed upon your heads all the keys of the kingdom of God. I have sealed upon you every key, power, principle that the God of heaven has revealed to me. Now, no matter where I may go or what I may do, the kingdom rests upon you.”

Now, don’t you wonder why we, as Apostles, could not have understood that the prophet of God was going to be taken away from us? But we did not understand it. The Apostles in the days of Jesus Christ could not understand what the Savior meant when He told them, “I am going away; if I do not go away the Comforter will not come!” [see John 16:7]. Neither did we understand what Joseph meant. “But,” he said, after having done this, “ye Apostles of the Lamb of God, my brethren, upon your shoulders this kingdom rests; now you have got to round up your shoulders and bear off the kingdom.” And he also made this very strange remark: “If you do not do it you will be damned.”

I am the last man living who heard that declaration. He told the truth, too; for would not any of the men who have held the keys of the kingdom of God or an apostleship in this Church have been under condemnation and would not the wrath of God have rested upon them if they had deserted these principles or denied and turned from them and undertaken to serve themselves instead of the work of the Lord which was committed to their hands?

The Keys Are Here

When the Lord gave the keys of the kingdom of God, the keys of the Melchizedek Priesthood, of the apostleship, and sealed them upon the head of Joseph Smith, He sealed them upon his head to stay here upon the earth until the coming of the Son of Man. Well might Brigham Young say, “The keys of the kingdom of God are here.” They were with him to the day of his death. They then rested upon the head of another man—President John Taylor. He held those keys to the hour of his death. They then fell by turn, or in the providence of God, upon Wilford Woodruff.

I say to the Latter-day Saints the keys of the kingdom of God are here, and they are going to stay here, too, until the coming of the Son of Man. Let all Israel understand that. They may not rest upon my head but a short time, but they will then rest on the head of another Apostle, and another after him, and so continue until the coming of the Lord Jesus Christ in the clouds of heaven to “reward every man according to the deeds done in the body” [see History of the Church, 1:245]. …

We Are in the Hands of the Lord

… I say to all Israel at this day, I say to the whole world, that the God of Israel, who organized this Church and kingdom, never ordained any President or Presidency to lead it astray. Hear it, ye Israel, no man who has ever breathed the breath of life can hold these keys of the kingdom of God and lead the people astray. …

Let us make up our minds to serve and honor God. Do not have any fears concerning the kingdom; the Lord will lead that aright; and if Brother Woodruff or any of the Presidency of this Church should take any course to lead you astray, the Lord will remove us out of the way. We are in the hands of the Lord, and those keys will be held and taken care of by the God of Israel until He comes whose right it is to reign.

 

D&C 124 – January 1841 a command was given to build the Nauvoo temple, the majority of the 12 are in England on their missions.

 

Illinois and US politics and the Church – Stephen A. Douglas was a friend to the Church until 1857.  He got caught up in the slavery and Utah (Mormon) issues.  He liked Joseph but not Brigham.

 

One of the most notable instances of this kind was Stephen A. Douglas, who was at one time a good friend of Joseph Smith. In order to gratify his ambition and gain political distinction, he refused to listen to the dictates of conscience, and made a bitter attack upon the Saints, although the Prophet of the Lord had warned him of what the result would be, if he took such a course. He rejected true honor, and was in turn rejected by the spirit of manly uprightness that had formerly characterized his life; and all this because he thought he could see Fortune ahead of him holding out alluring promises. Almost every Latter-day Saint knows what the result was. When he denounced this people, and said that they were "outlaws, unfit to be citizens of a territory, much less ever to become citizens of one of the free and independent states of this confederacy," he gave the destroyer, who unseen was riding alongside, a fatal hold on him. Stephen A. Douglas was not the only candidate for the Presidential chair who was acquainted with the doctrines of the Church, and who had every reason to believe they were true; nor was he the only one who found, when it was too late, how elusive Fortune may be.

Improvement Era 1903

 

John C. Bennett.

 

16. John C. Bennett] was born in Massachusetts in 1804. He was well educated and possessed many gifts and accomplishments. He was a physician, a university professor, and a brigadier-general. On the 27th of July, 1840, he offered his services to the Church. The Prophet Joseph replied, inviting him to come to Commerce, if he felt so disposed, but warned him at the same time not to expect exaltation "in this generation," from devotion to the cause of truth and a suffering people; nor worldly riches; only the approval of God. The outcome of the correspondence was that he joined the Church and rose to prominent positions among the Saints. His fellowship with the people of God did not last long, however. On the 25th of May, 1842, he was notified that the leaders of the Church did no longer recognize him as a member, because of his impure life, and shortly afterwards the Church took action against him. Then he became one of the most bitter enemies of the Church. His slanders, his falsehoods and unscrupulous attacks, which included perjury and attempted assassination, were the means of inflaming public opinion to such an extent that the tragedy at Carthage became possible.

 

Why, then, did his name appear, in this Revelation, as that of a trusted assistant of Joseph? John Taylor furnishes the answer to that question. He says, "Respecting John C. Bennett: I was well acquainted with him. At one time he was a good man, but fell into adultery, and was cut off from the Church for his iniquity" (Hist. of the Church, Vol. V., p. 81). At this time he was a good man. But he was overcome by the adversary and made the slave of his carnal desires. The Lord knew him and warned him. "His reward shall not fail if he receive counsel." "He shall be great * * * if he do this," etc. Bennett did not heed these warning "ifs" from Him who knew what was in his heart.

 

"Bennett lived to be despised by all who knew him.”For some years before his death he suffered from violent fits; he also partly lost the use of his limbs and of his tongue, and it was difficult for him to make himself understood. He dragged out a miserable existence, without a person scarcely to take the least interest in his fate, and died without a soul to mourn his departure" (Andrew Jenson, Hist. Rec., p. 496).

 

 

(Hyrum M. Smith and Janne M. Sjodahl, Doctrine and Covenants Commentary [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1978

770.)

 

 

The Church needed good PR, the Jackson County experience still stung.  Bennett was well liked and helped the Church establish good relations in Illinois; he fell and became a bitter enemy to the Church.

 

They were both tested and failed the test of devotion to what they knew to be true!

 

D&C 3, 10 – Both were about the 116 pages of the Book of Lehi, 10:37 is a very important verse about a prophet or bishop not always knowing another’s righteous motives or vice versa, but the Lord knows a man’s heart perfectly.  We in the church have misconceptions about men in authority; they do not have to know everything.

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 10:37.)

 

37 But as you cannot always judge the righteous, or as you cannot always tell the wicked from the righteous, therefore I say unto you, hold your peace until I shall see fit to make all things known unto the world concerning the matter.

 

We discussed the purpose of the Mason’s in Nauvoo.  Members joined because it was a service organization, which gave the Church good PR; also, it taught the saints to keep a secret!  Soon the temple ceremony will be taught to the saints and they will have to keep that quiet, Masons taught them how to keep quiet about sacred teachings.

 

Revelation 1:14-16, Hebrews 4:11-12 – The Lord can discern the hearts of men, it is a sifting process to see who will be faithful and endure the testing and trials.

 

Church being cleansed. Now, if we want our generations to live in the earth and to have them go down through the thousand years, if we want to have representatives among the children of men during that happy period, we have to lay the foundation for that now. . . . The day of the Lord cometh; it is near at hand; and if we and our children live, it will be because we try to be pure. No generation from this time forth can live for any length of time unless they are pure; God has said it, and His word does not return unfulfilled.

 

Even now you can see how this Church is being cleansed as we go along. Look at the families that we have known in the Church, and see how they are being thinned out, just as though we were passing through a sifting machine. And when we see how few of those whom we have known have clung to the iron rod and maintained their faith, we are led to ask, "who then can be saved?" Then, how many families there are who, after the death of the father and mother, are not numbered among the Saints of God! This is a cleansing process which is going on, and it will continue to go on more and more, because we are advancing. The Lord will hold us to a stricter accountability than He ever has done because we have more light and because of the near approach of the end. (Oct. 6, 1897, CR 52-54)

 

 

(George Q. Cannon, Gospel Truth: Discourses and Writings of President George Q. Cannon, selected, arranged, and edited by Jerreld L. Newquist [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1987], 49.)

 

 

President Ezra Taft Benson expanded on the nature of the tests we will face and confirmed that the process has already begun: "There is a real sifting going on in the Church, and it is going to become more pronounced with the passing of time. It will sift the wheat from the tares, because we face some difficult days, the like of which we have never experienced in our lives. And those days are going to require faith and testimony and family unity, the like of which we have never had." fn

(Watch and Be Ready: Preparing for the Second Coming of the Lord [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1994], 18 - 19.)

 

Joseph was very forgiving of others.

 

He was also a loyal friend and cared deeply about others. He repeatedly extended a forgiving hand to prodigals, some of whom had caused him pain and misery. "I feel myself bound to be a friend to all…wether they are just or unjust; they have a degree of my compassion & sympathy" (PWJS, p. 548). One observer noted that the Prophet would never go to bed if he knew there was a sick person who needed assistance. He taught that "love is one of the leading characteristics of Deity, and ought to be manifested by those who aspire to be the sons of God. A man filled with the love of God, is not content with blessing his family alone but ranges through the world, anxious to bless the whole of the human family" (PWJS, p. 481). One Church member who stayed at the Smith home and witnessed the Prophet's "earnest and humble devotions…nourishing, soothing, and comforting his family, neighbours, and friends," found observation of his private life a greater witness of Joseph Smith's divine calling than observing his public actions (JD 7:176-77).

(Encyclopedia of Mormonism, 1-4 vols., edited by Daniel H. Ludlow (New York: Macmillan, 1992), 1339.)

 

 

The Testing Nature of Mortality

 

 

Individual Testing                                                                     Collective Testing

 

1. Continual testing in mortality                                      1.  New York to Ohio D&C 1:30, D&C 38

 

2.  Members of the 12 who were excommunicated       2.  Kirtland to Missouri D&C 97:1-8, Law

     John W. Taylor                                                               of Consecration D&C 101:3-8

     Matthias Cowley

     Richard Lyman                                                          3.  Nauvoo

 

3.  Every prophet and apostle is tested to his fullest     

 

4.  There are more Nauvoo’s for us, A of F 9

     The Lord will find out where are hearts are.

 

In the Church General Conference in April, 1906, Joseph was advanced from a clerk in the Historian's Office to the position of an assistant historian, succeeding Orson F. Whitney, who was sustained as a member of the Council of Twelve. Other assistant historians were: B. H. Roberts, Andrew Jenson and Amos Musser. George F. Richards and David O. McKay were appointed to the Council of Twelve at this same conference, along with Whitney. The three vacancies had been created by the death of Apostle Marriner W. Merrill of Richmond, Utah, and the requested resignations of Apostles John W. Taylor, son of President John Taylor, and Matthias F. Cowley. Elders Taylor and Cowley were casualties of the anti-Mormon crusade being waged by ex-Senators Thomas Kearns, Frank J. Cannon, Senators Julius C. Burrows and Fred Dubois and others in connection with the Reed Smoot hearings in Congress. Taylor and Cowley were two of the general authorities who felt strongly that plural marriage should be continued and they had personally married additional wives as well as performing plural marriages for others after the Manifesto. When they declined to appear before the Senate committee investigating Smoot, and as the anti-Mormon pressure over the issue continued to mount, President Smith reluctantly asked for their resignations. Their exercise of the priesthood was suspended. Years later in his old age Elder Cowley was again allowed the use of the priesthood. Elder Taylor was later excommunicated for taking still more wives, then in 1965, nearly half a century after his death, he was vicariously reinstated to Church membership and priesthood, with President Joseph Fielding Smith of the Council of Twelve officiating in the ceremony. Elder Merrill's resignation would also have been requested had he not died just when he did, for he too had continued performing plural marriages, according to his grandson, Dr. Milton R. Merrill, a biographer of Senator Reed Smoot.

 

(Joseph Fielding Smith, Jr., and John J. Stewart, The Life of Joseph Fielding Smith [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1972], 145 - 146.)

 

 

There are periods of prosperity and periods of testing, we will have more testing.

 

Wilford Woodruff “Keys to the Kingdom”, April 2004, Ensign

 

 

Gospel Classics:
The Keys of the Kingdom

Published in Millennial Star, 2 Sept. 1889, 545–49; subheads added; paragraphing altered; punctuation, capitalization, and spelling modernized.

Wilford Woodruff, “The Keys of the Kingdom,” Ensign, Apr. 2004, 29
Wilford Woodruff was born on 1 March 1807 in Connecticut to Aphek and Beulah Woodruff. Zera Pulsipher, an early Church missionary, baptized him on 31 December 1833 in an icy stream near Richland, New York. He was ordained an Apostle by Brigham Young on 26 April 1839 and became Church President on 7 April 1889. He died on 2 September 1898 in San Francisco, California. This is a portion of the remarks given by President Woodruff on 2 June 1889 at a YMMIA conference.

Before the close of this conference there is a subject upon which I wish to bear my testimony. … I am … the only one living in the flesh who was with … Joseph Smith, the Prophet of God, when he gave to the Twelve Apostles their charge concerning the priesthood and the keys of the kingdom of God; and as I myself shall soon pass away like other men, I want to leave my testimony to these Latter-day Saint[s].

News of the Martyrdom

I was sitting with Brigham Young in the depot in the city of Boston at the time when the two prophets [Joseph Smith and his brother Hyrum] were martyred. Of course we had no telegraphs and no fast reports as we have today to give communication over the land. During that period Brother Young was waiting there for a train of cars to go to Peterborough. Whilst sitting there we were overshadowed by a cloud of darkness and gloom as great as I ever witnessed in my life. … Neither of us knew or understood the cause until after the report of the death of the prophets was manifested to us. Brother Brigham left; I remained in Boston, and the next day took passage for Fox Islands, a place I had visited some years before, and baptized numbers of people and organized branches upon both those islands. My father-in-law, Ezra Carter, carried me on a wagon from Scarborough to Portland. I there engaged passage on board of a steamer. I had put my trunk on board and was just bidding my father-in-law farewell, when a man came out from a shop—a shoemaker—holding a newspaper in his hand. He said, “Father Carter, Joseph and Hyrum Smith have been martyred—they have been murdered in Carthage Jail!”

As soon as I looked at the paper, the Spirit said to me that it was true. I had no time for consultation, the steamer’s bell was ringing, so I stepped on board and took my trunk back to land. As I drew it off, the plank was drawn in. I told Father Carter to drive me back to Scarborough. I there took the car for Boston. …

Next day I met Brigham Young in the streets of Boston, he having just returned, opposite to Sister Voce’s house. We reached out our hands, but neither of us was able to speak a word. We walked into Sister Voce’s house. We each took a seat and [covered] our faces. We were overwhelmed with grief and our faces were soon bathed in a flood of tears. … After we had done weeping we began to converse together concerning the death of the prophets. In the course of the conversation, he smote his hand upon his thigh and said, “Thank God, the keys of the kingdom are here.” …

The Last Meeting

All that President Young or myself or any member of the Quorum need have done in the matter was to have referred to the last instructions at the last meeting we had with the Prophet Joseph before starting on our mission. I have alluded to that meeting many times in my life.

The Prophet Joseph, I am now satisfied, had a thorough presentiment that that was the last meeting we would hold together here in the flesh. We had had our endowments; we had had all the blessings sealed upon our heads that were ever given to the apostles or prophets on the face of the earth. On that occasion the Prophet Joseph rose up and said to us: “Brethren, I have desired to live to see this temple built. I shall never live to see it, but you will. I have sealed upon your heads all the keys of the kingdom of God. I have sealed upon you every key, power, principle that the God of heaven has revealed to me. Now, no matter where I may go or what I may do, the kingdom rests upon you.”

Now, don’t you wonder why we, as Apostles, could not have understood that the prophet of God was going to be taken away from us? But we did not understand it. The Apostles in the days of Jesus Christ could not understand what the Savior meant when He told them, “I am going away; if I do not go away the Comforter will not come!” [see John 16:7]. Neither did we understand what Joseph meant. “But,” he said, after having done this, “ye Apostles of the Lamb of God, my brethren, upon your shoulders this kingdom rests; now you have got to round up your shoulders and bear off the kingdom.” And he also made this very strange remark: “If you do not do it you will be damned.”

I am the last man living who heard that declaration. He told the truth, too; for would not any of the men who have held the keys of the kingdom of God or an apostleship in this Church have been under condemnation and would not the wrath of God have rested upon them if they had deserted these principles or denied and turned from them and undertaken to serve themselves instead of the work of the Lord which was committed to their hands?

The Keys Are Here

When the Lord gave the keys of the kingdom of God, the keys of the Melchizedek Priesthood, of the apostleship, and sealed them upon the head of Joseph Smith, He sealed them upon his head to stay here upon the earth until the coming of the Son of Man. Well might Brigham Young say, “The keys of the kingdom of God are here.” They were with him to the day of his death. They then rested upon the head of another man—President John Taylor. He held those keys to the hour of his death. They then fell by turn, or in the providence of God, upon Wilford Woodruff.

I say to the Latter-day Saints the keys of the kingdom of God are here, and they are going to stay here, too, until the coming of the Son of Man. Let all Israel understand that. They may not rest upon my head but a short time, but they will then rest on the head of another Apostle, and another after him, and so continue until the coming of the Lord Jesus Christ in the clouds of heaven to “reward every man according to the deeds done in the body” [see History of the Church, 1:245]. …

We Are in the Hands of the Lord

… I say to all Israel at this day, I say to the whole world, that the God of Israel, who organized this Church and kingdom, never ordained any President or Presidency to lead it astray. Hear it, ye Israel, no man who has ever breathed the breath of life can hold these keys of the kingdom of God and lead the people astray. …

Let us make up our minds to serve and honor God. Do not have any fears concerning the kingdom; the Lord will lead that aright; and if Brother Woodruff or any of the Presidency of this Church should take any course to lead you astray, the Lord will remove us out of the way. We are in the hands of the Lord, and those keys will be held and taken care of by the God of Israel until He comes whose right it is to reign.

 

 

 

Brigham Young 8/4/1844

 

May 6, 2004

 

 

 

70,000 Saints came to the Salt Lake valley, 67,000 came by wagons and only 3,000 came by Handcarts, between 1856 and 1860.  The greatest test for those traveling was boredom!

 

We discussed miracles in the Church; Bruce mentioned the building of temples, missionaries to the world, genealogy, the spiritual rebirth process in individuals etc.  We as members sometimes sensationalize experiences that should be kept to ourselves.  Can the Lord trust you with a sacred experience?

 

The modern miracles in the Church far outpace the parting of the Red Sea, this is world wide.

 

John 20:30-31 – John included 7 miracles in his gospel, 5 of which no other writer included.  There was a reason why he included them.

 

Elder Dallin Oaks talk on miracles is a classic.  There are many sacred experiences in the modern church, examples are the stories of Elder Haight, 1985 heart attack and Elder Hales in October 2002 Conference.

 

The Sacrament--and the Sacrifice

Elder David B. Haight
Of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles
Ensign, Nov. 1989, pp. 59-61

I pray for your faith and prayers that my utterances will be received and understood "by the Spirit of truth" and that my expressions will be given "by the Spirit of truth" so that we might all be "edified and rejoice together." (See D&C 50:21-22.)

As I stand here today--a well man--words of gratitude and acknowledgment of divine intervention are so very inadequate in expressing the feelings in my soul.

Six months ago at the April general conference, I was excused from speaking as I was convalescing from a serious operation. My life has been spared, and I now have the pleasant opportunity of acknowledging the blessings, comfort, and ready aid of my Brethren in the First Presidency and Quorum of the Twelve, and other wonderful associates and friends to whom I owe so much and who surrounded my dear wife, Ruby, and my family with their time, attention, and prayers. For the inspired doctors and thoughtful nurses I express my deepest gratitude, and for the thoughtful letters and messages of faith and hope received from many places in the world, many expressing, "You have been in our prayers" or "We have been asking our Heavenly Father to spare your life." Your prayers and mine, thankfully, have been answered.

One unusual card caused me to ponder upon the majesty of it all. It is an original painting by Arta Romney Ballif of the heavens at night with its myriad golden stars. Her caption, taken from Psalms, reads:

"Praise ye the Lord: …
"He healeth the broken in heart, and bindeth up their wounds.
"He telleth the number of the stars; he calleth them all by their names.
"… His understanding is infinite." (Ps. 147:1, 3-5.)

As I lay in the hospital bed, I meditated on all that had happened to me and studied the contemplative painting by President Marion G. Romney's sister and the lines from Psalms: "He telleth the number of the stars; he calleth them all by their names." I was then--and continue to be--awed by the goodness and majesty of the Creator, who knows not only the names of the stars but knows your name and my name--each of us as His sons and daughters.

The psalmist, David, wrote:

"When I consider thy heavens, the work of thy fingers, the moon and the stars, which thou hast ordained;
"What is man, that thou art mindful of him? …
"For thou hast made him a little lower than the angels, and hast crowned him with glory and honour." (Ps. 8:3-5.)

To be remembered is a wonderful thing.

The evening of my health crisis, I knew something very serious had happened to me. Events happened so swiftly--the pain striking with such intensity, my dear Ruby phoning the doctor and our family, and I on my knees leaning over the bathtub for support and some comfort and hoped relief from the pain. I was pleading to my Heavenly Father to spare my life a while longer to give me a little more time to do His work, if it was His will.

While still praying, I began to lose consciousness. The siren of the paramedic truck was the last that I remembered before unconsciousness overtook me, which would last for the next several days.

The terrible pain and commotion of people ceased. I was now in a calm, peaceful setting; all was serene and quiet. I was conscious of two persons in the distance on a hillside, one standing on a higher level than the other. Detailed features were not discernible. The person on the higher level was pointing to something I could not see.

I heard no voices but was conscious of being in a holy presence and atmosphere. During the hours and days that followed, there was impressed again and again upon my mind the eternal mission and exalted position of the Son of Man. I witness to you that He is Jesus the Christ, the Son of God, Savior to all, Redeemer of all mankind, Bestower of infinite love, mercy, and forgiveness, the Light and Life of the world. I knew this truth before--I had never doubted nor wondered. But now I knew, because [page 60] of the impressions of the Spirit upon my heart and soul, these divine truths in a most unusual way.

I was shown a panoramic view of His earthly ministry: His baptism, His teaching, His healing the sick and lame, the mock trial, His crucifixion, His resurrection and ascension. There followed scenes of His earthly ministry to my mind in impressive detail, confirming scriptural eyewitness accounts. I was being taught, and the eyes of my understanding were opened by the Holy Spirit of God so as to behold many things.

The first scene was of the Savior and His Apostles in the upper chamber on the eve of His betrayal. Following the Passover supper, He instructed and prepared the sacrament of the Lord's Supper for His dearest friends as a remembrance of His coming sacrifice. It was so impressively portrayed to me--the overwhelming love of the Savior for each. I witnessed His thoughtful concern for significant details--the washing of the dusty feet of each Apostle, His breaking and blessing of the loaf of dark bread and blessing of the wine, then His dreadful disclosure that one would betray Him.

He explained Judas's departure and told the others of the events soon to take place.

Then followed the Savior's solemn discourse when He said to the Eleven: "These things I have spoken unto you, that in me ye might have peace. In the world ye shall have tribulation: but be of good cheer; I have overcome the world." (John 16:33.)

Our Savior prayed to His Father and acknowledged the Father as the source of His authority and power--even to the extending of eternal life to all who are worthy.

He prayed, "And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent."

Jesus then reverently added:

"I have glorified thee on the earth: I have finished the work which thou gavest me to do.
"And now, O Father, glorify thou me with thine own self with the glory which I had with thee before the world was." (John 17:3-5.)

He pled not only for the disciples called out from the world who had been true to their testimony of Him, "but for them also which shall believe on me through their word." (John 17:20.)

When they had sung a hymn, Jesus and the Eleven went out to the Mount of Olives. There, in the garden, in some manner beyond our comprehension, the Savior took upon Himself the burden of the sins of mankind from Adam to the end of the world. His agony in the garden, Luke tells us, was so intense "his sweat was as … great drops of blood falling … to the ground." (Luke 22:44.) He suffered an agony and a burden the like of which no human person would be able to bear. In that hour of anguish our Savior overcame all the power of Satan.

The glorified Lord revealed to Joseph Smith this admonition to all mankind:

"Therefore I command you to repent …

"For … I, God, … suffered … for all, that they might not suffer if they would repent; …
"Which suffering caused myself, even God, the greatest of all, to tremble because of pain, and to bleed at every pore, …
"Wherefore, I command you again to repent, lest I humble you with my almighty power; and that you confess your sins, lest you suffer these punishments." (D&C 19:15-16, 18, 20.)

During those days of unconsciousness I was given, by the gift and power of the Holy Ghost, a more perfect knowledge of His mission. I was also given a more complete understanding of what it means to exercise, in His name, the authority to unlock the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven for the salvation of all who are faithful. My soul was taught over and over again the events of the betrayal, the mock trial, the scourging of the flesh of even one of the Godhead. I witnessed His struggling up the hill in His weakened condition carrying the cross and His being stretched upon it as it lay on the ground, that the crude spikes could be driven with a mallet into His hands and wrists and feet to secure His body as it hung on the cross for public display.

Crucifixion--the horrible and painful death which He suffered--was chosen from the beginning. By that excruciating death, He descended below all things, as is recorded, that through His resurrection He would ascend above all things. (See D&C 88:6.)

Jesus Christ died in the literal sense in which we will all die. His body lay in the tomb. The immortal spirit of Jesus, chosen as the Savior of mankind, went to those myriads of spirits who had departed mortal life with varying degrees of righteousness to God's laws. He taught them the "glorious tidings of redemption from the bondage of death, and of possible salvation, … [which was] part of [our] Savior's foreappointed and unique service to the human family." (James E. Talmage, Jesus the Christ, Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1977, p. 671.)

I cannot begin to convey to you the deep impact that these scenes have confirmed upon my soul. I sense their eternal meaning and realize that "nothing in the entire plan of salvation compares in any way in importance with that most transcendent of all events, the atoning sacrifice of our Lord. It is the most important single thing that has ever occurred in the entire history of created things; it is the rock foundation upon which the gospel and all other things rest," as has been declared. (Bruce R. McConkie, Mormon Doctrine, Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1966, p. 60.)

Father Lehi taught his son Jacob and us today:

"Wherefore, redemption cometh in and through the Holy Messiah; for he is full of grace and truth.
"Behold, he offereth himself a sacrifice for sin, to answer the ends of the law, unto all those who have a broken heart and a contrite spirit; and unto none else can the ends of the law be answered.
"Wherefore, how great the importance to make these things known unto the inhabitants of the earth, that they may know that there is no flesh that can dwell in the presence of God, save it be through the merits, and mercy, and grace of the Holy Messiah, who layeth down his life according to the flesh, and taketh it again by the power of the Spirit, that he may bring to pass the [page 61] resurrection of the dead, being the first that should rise.
"Wherefore, he is the firstfruits unto God, inasmuch as he shall make intercession for all the children of men; and they that believe in him shall be saved." (2 Ne. 2:6-9.)

Our most valuable worship experience in the sacrament meeting is the sacred ordinance of the sacrament, for it provides the opportunity to focus our minds and hearts upon the Savior and His sacrifice.

The Apostle Paul warned the early Saints against eating this bread and drinking this cup of the Lord unworthily. (See 1 Cor. 11:27-30.)

Our Savior Himself instructed the Nephites, "Whoso eateth and drinketh my flesh and blood unworthily [brings] damnation to his soul." (3 Ne. 18:29.)

Worthy partakers of the sacrament are in harmony with the Lord and put themselves under covenant with Him to always remember His sacrifice for the sins of the world, to take upon them the name of Christ and to always remember Him, and to keep His commandments. The Savior covenants that we who do so shall have His spirit to be with us and that, if faithful to the end, we may inherit eternal life.

Our Lord revealed to Joseph Smith that "there is no gift greater than the gift of salvation," which plan includes the ordinance of the sacrament as a continuous reminder of the Savior's atoning sacrifice. He gave instructions that "it is expedient that the church meet together often to partake of bread and wine in the remembrance of the Lord Jesus." (D&C 6:13; D&C 20:75.)

Immortality comes to us all as a free gift by the grace of God alone, without works of righteousness. Eternal life, however, is the reward for obedience to the laws and ordinances of His gospel.

I testify to all of you that our Heavenly Father does answer our righteous pleadings. The added knowledge which has come to me has made a great impact upon my life. The gift of the Holy Ghost is a priceless possession and opens the door to our ongoing knowledge of God and eternal joy. Of this I bear witness, in the holy name of Jesus Christ, amen.

Bruce discussed the troubled life of Sidney Rigdon, on August 7, 1844 in the Seventies Hall he gives his reasons to be the Guardian of the church; he speaks truth and non truth.  Brigham Young talks of authority and keys held by the 12. 

 

D&C 107:21-26 – authority and power (keys), 1st Quorum = 1st Presidency, 2nd Quorum = Quorum of the 12, 3rd Quorum=the 70’s.

 

 

Brigham only wanted to find out the will of the Lord, he wasn’t out to lead the church

 

Majority of the Twelve in Council—Nauvoo.

 

Wednesday, 7.—Elders Brigham Young, Heber C. Kimball, Parley P. Pratt, Orson Pratt, Willard Richards, Wilford Woodruff, George A. Smith and Lyman Wight met in council with Elder Taylor at his house. They found him recovering from his wounds received at the massacre of the Prophets.

 

The Twelve felt to rejoice at having the privilege of again meeting in council together, after having passed through such trying scenes, and to be welcomed by the saints who considered it very providential for the Twelve to arrive at this particular juncture, when their minds were agitated, their hearts sorrowful, and darkness seemed to cloud their path, feeling like sheep without a shepherd, their beloved Prophet having been taken away.

 

Meetin of Church Authorities at Nauvoo.

 

4 p.m.Meeting of the Twelve Apostles, high council and high priests at the Seventies' Hall.

 

President William Marks prayed.

 

President Brigham Young called upon President Rigdon to make a statement to the church concerning his message to the saints, and the vision and revelation he had received.

 

President Rigdon said:—

 

'The object of my mission is to visit the saints and offer myself to them as a guardian. I had a vision at Pittsburgh, June 27th. This was presented to my mind not as an open vision, but rather a continuation of the vision mentioned in the Book of Doctrine and Covenants.fn

 

The Proposition of Elder Rigdon to Become "Guardian" to the Church.

 

It was shown to me that this church must be built up to Joseph, and that all the blessings we receive must come through him. I have been ordained a spokesman to Joseph, and I must come to Nauvoo and see that the church is governed in a proper manner. Joseph sustains the same relationship to this church as he has always done. No man can be the successor of Joseph.

 

The kingdom is to be built up to Jesus Christ through Joseph; there must be revelation still. The martyred Prophet is still the head of this church; every quorum should stand as you stood in your washings and consecrations. I have been consecrated a spokesman to Joseph, and I was commanded to speak for him. The church is not disorganized though our head is gone.

 

We may have a diversity of feelings on this matter. I have been called to be a spokesman unto Joseph, and I want to build up the church unto him; and if the people want me to sustain this place, I want it upon the principle that every individual shall acknowledge it for himself.

 

I propose to be a guardian to the people; in this I have discharged my duty and done what God has commanded me, and the people can please themselves whether they accept me or not.'

 

President Brigham Young said;—

 

Attitude of Brigham Young—The Twelve Hold the "Keys".

 

'I do not care who leads the church, even though it were Ann Lee; but one thing I must know, and that is what God says about it. I have the keys and the means of obtaining the mind of God on the subject.

 

I know there are those in our midst who will seek the lives of the Twelve as they did the lives of Joseph and Hyrum. We shall ordain others and give the fullness of the priesthood, so that if we are killed the fullness of the priesthood may remain.

 

Joseph conferred upon our heads all the keys and powers belonging to the Apostleship which he himself held before he was taken away, and no man or set of men can get between Joseph and the Twelve in this world or in the world to come.

 

How often has Joseph said to the Twelve, 'I have laid the foundation and you must build thereon, for upon your shoulders the kingdom rests.'

 

The Twelve, as a quorum, will not be permitted to tarry here long; they will go abroad and bear off the kingdom to the nations of the earth, and baptize the people faster than mobs can kill them off. I would like, were it my privilege, to take my valise and travel and preach till we had a people gathered who would be true.

 

My private feelings would be to let the affairs of men and women alone, only go and preach and baptize them into the kingdom of God; yet, whatever duty God places upon me, in his strength I intend to fulfill it.

 

I want to see this people, with the various quorums of the priesthood, assembled together in special conference on Thursdayfn next at 10 a.m.'

 

Which was carried unanimously by vote."

 

 

Chapter 18

 

1. Sometimes spelled "Minor".

 

2. Undoubtedly Elder Rigdon referred to the continuation of the "Vision" of The Three Glories, now published in section 76 of the current edition of the Doctrine and Covenants, though what the connection could be is difficult to see.

 

3. In the previous publication of this historical item (Millennial Star, vol. 25, p. 216) the language is "I want to see this people with their various quorums of the priesthood assembled together in special conference on Tuesday next." This would have brought the meeting on Tuesday the 13th of August. Evidently the word "Tuesday" was a misprint and should have been, as changed above in the text, "Thursday", which was the day following the council meeting and as a matter of fact it was the next day following, August 8th, that the general public meeting of the church with the quorums assembled in their order to settle this matter of the presiding council in the church that the meeting was held. B. H. R.

 

 

(Joseph Smith, History of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 7 vols., introduction and notes by B. H. Roberts [Salt Lake City: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 1932-1951], 7: 228.)

 

 

The Settlement of Church Leadership—The Twelve Apostles Accepted as the Presidency of the Church, Brigham Young at Their Head

 

 Special Public Meeting of the Church.

 

"Thursday, August 8th, 1844.—At a special meeting of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints held in Nauvoo, at 10 a. m. on Thursday, August 8, 1844, by the request of President William Marks, (who was then presiding over that stake of Zion) to choose a guardian, or President and Trustee, Sidney Rigdon took his position in a wagon, about two rods in front of the stand, and harangued the saints for about one and a half hours, upon choosing a guardian for the church. The meeting was then dismissed, when President Brigham Young gave out an appointment for the brethren to assemble at 2 p.m.

 

At the appointed time the brethren came together. Present, of the Twelve, Brigham Young, Heber C. Kimball, Parley P. Pratt, Orson Pratt, Willard Richards, Wilford Woodruff, George A. Smith.fn The several quorums were organized on and around the stand according to order.

 

The Remarks of President Young in Behalf of the Claim of the Twelve to Lead the Church in the Absence of the First Presidency

 

The meeting being opened, President Brigham Young arose and said:——

 

'Attention all! This congregation makes me think of the days of King Benjamin, the multitude being so great that all could not hear. I request the brethren not to have any feelings for being convened this afternoon, for it is necessary; we want you all to be still and give attention, that all may hear. Let none complain because of the situation of the congregation, we will do the best we can.

 

For the first time in my life, for the first time in your lives, for the first time in the kingdom of God in the 19th century, without a Prophet at our head, do I step forth to act in my calling in connection with the Quorum of the Twelve, as Apostles of Jesus Christ unto this generation—Apostles whom God has called by revelation through the Prophet Joseph, who are ordained and anointed to bear off the keys of the kingdom of God in all the world.

 

This people have hitherto walked by sight and not by faith. You have had the Prophet in your midst. Do you all understand? You have walked by sight and without much pleading to the Lord to know whether things were right or not.

 

Heretofore you have had a Prophet as the mouth of the Lord to speak to you, but he has sealed his testimony with his blood, and now, for the first time, are you called to walk by faith, not by sight.

 

The first position I take in behalf of the Twelve and the people is, to ask a few questions. I ask the Latter-day Saints: do you, as individuals, at this time, want to choose a Prophet or a guardian? Inasmuch as our Prophet and Patriarch are taken from our midst, do you want some one to guard, to guide and lead you through this world into the kingdom of God, or not? All that want some person to be a guardian or a Prophet, a spokesman or something else, signify it by raising the right hand. (No votes).

 

When I came to this stand I had peculiar feelings and impressions. The faces of this people seem to say, we want a shepherd to guide and lead us through this world. All that want to draw away a party from the church after them, let them do it if they can, but they will not prosper.

 

If any man thinks he has influence among this people to lead away a party, let him try it, and he will find out that there is power with the Apostles which will carry them off victorious through all the world, and build up and defend the church and kingdom of God.

 

What do the people want? I feel as though I wanted the privilege to weep and mourn for thirty days at least, then rise up, shake myself, and tell the people what the Lord wants of them; although my heart is too full of mourning to launch forth into business transactions and the organization of the church, I feel compelled this day to step forth in the discharge of those duties God has placed upon me.

 

I now wish to speak of the organization of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. If the church is organized, and you want to know how it is organized, I will tell you. I know your feelings—do you want me to tell your feelings?

 

Here is President Rigdon, who was counselor to Joseph. I ask, where are Joseph and Hyrum? They are gone beyond the veil; and if Elder Rigdon wants to act as his counselor, he must go beyond the veil where he is.

 

There has been much said about President Rigdon being President of the Church, and leading the people, being the head, etc. Brother Rigdon has come 1,600 miles to tell you what he wants to do for you. If the people want President Rigdon to lead them they may have him; but I say unto you that the Quorum of the Twelve have the keys of the kingdom of God in all the world.

 

The Twelve are appointed by the finger of God. Here is Brigham, have his knees ever faltered? Have his lips ever quivered? Here is Heber and the rest of the Twelve, an independent body who have the keys of the priesthood—the keys of the kingdom of God to deliver to all the world: this is true, so help me God. They stand next to Joseph, and are as the First Presidency of the Church.

 

I do not know whether my enemies will take my life or not, and I do not care, for I want to be with the man I love.

 

You cannot fill the office of a prophet, seer and revelator: God must do this. You are like children without a father and sheep without a shepherd. You must not appoint any man at our head; if you should, the Twelve must ordain him. You cannot appoint a man at our head; but if you do want any other man or men to lead you, take them and we will go our way to build up the kingdom in all the world.

 

I know who are Joseph's friends, and who are his enemies. I know where the keys of the kingdom are, and where they will eternally be. You cannot call a man to be a prophet; you cannot take Elder Rigdon and place him above the Twelve; if so, he must be ordained by them.

 

I tell you there is an overanxiety to hurry matters here. You cannot take any man and put him at the head; you would scatter the saints to the four winds, you would sever the priesthood. So long as we remain as we are, the heavenly Head is in constant cooperation with us; and if you go out of that course, God will have nothing to do with you.

 

Again, perhaps some think that our beloved Brother Rigdon would not be honored, would not be looked to as a friend; but if he does right and remains faithful he will not act against our counsel nor we against his, but act together, and we shall be as one.

 

I again repeat, no man can stand at our head, except God reveals it from the heavens.

 

I have spared no pains to learn my lesson of the kingdom in this world and in the eternal worlds; and if it were not so, I could go and live in peace; but for the gospel and your sakes I shall stand in my place. We are liable to be killed all the day long. You have never lived by faith.

 

Brother Joseph, the Prophet, has laid the foundation for a great work, and we will build upon it; you have never seen the quorums built one upon another. There is an almighty foundation laid, and we can build a kingdom such as there never was in the world: we can build a kingdom faster than satan can kill the saints off.

 

What do you want? Do you want a patriarch for the whole church? To this we are perfectly willing. If Brother Samuel H. Smith had been living, it would have been his right and privilege; but he is dead, he is gone to Joseph and Hyrum, he is out of the reach of bullets and spears, and he can waft himself with his brothers, his friends and the saints.

 

Do you want a patriarch? Here is brother William [Smith] left; here is Uncle John Smith, uncle to the Prophet Joseph left; it is their right. The right of patriarchal blessings belongs to Joseph's family.

 

Do you want a Trustee-in-Trust? Has there been a bishop who has stood in his lot yet? What is his business? To take charge of the temporal affairs, so that the Twelve and the elders may go on their business. Joseph condescended to do their business for them. Joseph condescended to offer himself for president of the United States, and it was a great condescension.

 

Do you want a spokesman? Here are Elder Rigdon, Brother Amasa Lyman [whom Joseph expected to take as a counselor] and myself. Do you want the church properly organized, or do you want a spokesman to be chief cook and bottle-washer? Elder Rigdon claims to be spokesman to the Prophet. Very well, he was; but can he now act in that office? If he wants now to be a spokesman to the Prophet, he must go to the other side of the veil, for the Prophet is there, but Elder Rigdon is here. Why will Elder Rigdon be a fool? Who knows anything of the priesthood, or of the organization of the kingdom of God.fn I am plain.

 

Does this church want it as God organized it? Or do you want to clip the power of the priesthood, and let those who have the keys of the priesthood go and build up the kingdom in all the world, wherever the people will hear them?

 

If there is a spokesman, if he is a king and priest, let him go and build up a kingdom unto himself; that is his right and it is the right of many here, but the Twelve are at the head of it.

 

I want to live on the earth and spread truth through all the world. You saints of latter-days want things right. If 10,000 men rise up and say they have the Prophet Joseph Smith's shoes, I know they are impostors. In the priesthood you have a right to build up a kingdom, if you know how the church is organized.

 

Now, if you want Sidney Rigdon or William Law to lead you, or anybody else, you are welcome to them; but I tell you, in the name of the Lord that no man can put another between the Twelve and the Prophet Joseph. Why? Because Joseph was their file leader, and he has committed into their hands the keys of the kingdom in this last dispensation, for all the world; don't put a thread between the priesthood and God.

 

I will ask, who has stood next to Joseph and Hyrum? I have, and I will stand next to him. We have a head, and that head is the Apostleship, the spirit and power of Joseph, and we can now begin to see the necessity of that Apostleship.

 

Brother Rigdon was at his side—not above. No man has a right to counsel the Twelve but Joseph Smith. Think of these things. You cannot appoint a prophet; but if you let the Twelve remain and act in their place, the keys of the kingdom are with them and they can manage the affairs of the church and direct all things aright.

 

Now, all this does not lessen the character of President Rigdon: let him magnify his calling, and Joseph will want him beyond the veil—let him be careful what he does, lest that thread which binds us together is cut asunder. May God bless you all.’FN

 

(Much more was said by President Young, but not written).

 

Speech of Amasa M. Lyman

 

Amasa Lyman said:—

 

'I do not rise to electioneer. I am gratified with the open, frank and plain exposition of President Young. He has seen the relation I bear to my deceased brother [i. e. Joseph Smith]. I never did conceive it gave me a precedence to go before the Twelve.

 

I do not make exceptions to anything he has said. I believe there is no power, or officer, or means wanted to carry on the work, but what is in the Twelve. I am satisfied that no man can carry on the work, but the power that is in the Twelve, as has been stated.

 

There is one thing to secure the salvation of this people, and that is not in union alone, it is for you to know the right and be united—it has been presented to you by President Young, and I will back him up. All I design to do is to redeem my pledge.

 

President Young has stood next to the Prophet Joseph, with the Twelve, and I have stood next to them, and I will stand next to them. I have been at the back of Joseph Smith, and will be at the back of the Twelve forever, and then we will be saved.

 

There is no need of a President, we have a head here. What is that head? The Quorum of the Twelve Apostles are the head. We now see the necessity of the Apostleship.

 

I might rise up as well as any other man to ask for the Presidency, but I could not do it without endangering my salvation. This is the power that turns the key to bestow salvation through all the land, in the way that Joseph commenced it, the first one called to do the same in all the world. If Joseph Smith had any power to bear off the kingdom of God, the Twelve have the same.

 

I could not advocate a choosing of a President, and myself a candidate; so then you know the place I occupy is, to stand to the Twelve the same as the Twelve did to Joseph, either on one side or the other. I do not want to go before them or to fall asleep. I want to see the kingdom roll forth by our united faith and efforts.'

 

President Rigdon called upon W. W. Phelps to speak in his behalf, as he could not speak.

 

Speech of Elder W. W. Phelps—No Support to Sidney Rigdon

 

W. W. Phelps arose and said:—

 

'With the knowledge that I have I cannot suppose but that this congregation will act aright this day. I believe enough has been said to prepare the minds of the people to act.

 

I have known many of them for 14 years, and I have always known them to submit with deference to the authorities of the church. I have seen the elders of Israel and the people—take their lives in their hands and go without purse or scrip in winter and in summer. I have seen them prepare for war, and ready to pour out their hearts' blood, and that is an evidence that they will walk by counsel.

 

I am happy to see this little lake of faces, and to see the same spirit and disposition manifested here today, as it was the day after the bloody tragedy, when Joseph and Hyrum Smith were brought home dead to this city. Then you submitted to the law's slow delay, and handed the matter over to God; and I see the same thing today—you are now determined as one man to sustain the authorities of the church, and I am happy that the men who were on Joseph's right and left hand submit themselves to the authority of the priesthood.

 

I have feelings about this, especially for President Rigdon, and I want to say that there is a quorum that the Twelve belong to, and that the people will receive an endowment. I brought President Rigdon into that quorum, and he received in part the blessings. I could not bear the thought of President Rigdon going into the world without his endowment. He did obtain part, and I hope he will submit.

 

I want Brother Amasa to stand on the side of the Twelve, and they are wanted there still—let them go on and sustain them in that high office. You cannot put in a guardian of the church.

 

We have hitherto walked by sight, and if a man wanted to know anything he had only to go to Brother Joseph. Joseph has gone, but he has not left us comfortless.

 

I want to say that Brother Joseph came and enlightened me two days after he was buried. He came the same as when he was alive, and in a moment appeared to me in his own house. He said, 'Tell the drivers to drive on.' I asked if the building was on wheels? He said, 'certainly'. I spoke, and away it went. We drove all round the hills and valleys. He then told the drivers to drive on over the river into Iowa. I told him Devil Creek was before us. He said, 'Drive over Devil Creek; I don't care for Devil Creek or any other creek;' and we did so. Then I awoke.

 

There is a combination of persons in this city who are in continual intercourse with William and Wilson Law, who are at the bottom of the matter to destroy all that stand for Joseph, and there are persons now in this city who are only wanting power to murder all the persons that still hold on to Joseph; but let us go ahead and build up the Temple, and then you will be endowed. When the Temple is completed all the honorable mothers in Israel will be endowed, as well as the elders.

 

If you want to do right, uphold the Twelve. If they die, I am willing to die with them; but do your duty and you will be endowed. I will sustain the Twelve as long as I have breath.

 

When Joseph was going away he said he was going to die, and I said I was willing to die with him; but as I am now alive, as a lawyer in Israel, I am determined to live.

 

I want you all to recollect that Joseph and Hyrum have only been removed from the earth, and they now counsel and converse with the Gods beyond the reach of powder and ball.'

 

Remarks of Elder Parley P. Pratt

 

Parley P. Pratt said:—

 

'What has been said has been well said. If there are men here who are our enemies, I'll tell you when they will cease to be here: they will be here while you will deal with them. If I exchange property or deal with men, I do it with those whom I know to be faithful.

 

If there are wicked men here, it is because we support them. Stop dealing with them, and they will go away. Will I support them? No, I would deal with all honest men whom I know to be such.

 

I am willing to do good to all men, especially to the household of faith. Our enemies will cease to dwell here when you cease to deal with them. Mobs and wicked men will cease when you cease to support them.

 

I know we can all live and be happy too, when we deal with honest men. If a man wants a doctor or a lawyer, he will send directly for the worst man he can find.

 

I would die a natural death sooner than I would have a wicked doctor to help me off. I would go without sueing all the days of my life before I would go to a lawyer to sue. I will not say anything about the merchants, because you all know them.'

 

President Brigham Young's Second Speech

 

President Brigham Young again arose and said;—

 

'There is more business than can be done this afternoon, but we can accomplish all we want to have done without calling this convention of the whole church. I am going to present to you the leading items.

 

I do not ask you to take my counsel or advice alone, but every one of you act for yourselves; but if Brother Rigdon is the person you want to lead you, vote for him, but not unless you intend to follow him and support him as you did Joseph. Do not say so without you mean to take his counsel hereafter.

 

And I would say the same for the Twelve, don't make a covenant to support them unless you intend to abide by their counsel; and if they do not counsel you as you please, don't turn round and oppose them.

 

I want every man, before he enters into a covenant, to know what he is going to do; but we want to know if this people will support the priesthood in the name of Israel's God. If you say you will, do so.

 

We want men appointed to take charge of the business that did lay on the shoulders of Joseph. Let me say to you that this kingdom will spread more than ever.

 

The Twelve have the power now—the seventies, the elders and all of you can have power to go and build up the kingdom in the name of Israel's God. Nauvoo will not hold all the people that will come into the kingdom.

 

We want to build the Temple, so as to get our endowment; and if we do our best, and satan will not let us build it, we will go into the wilderness and we will receive the endowment, for we will receive an endowment anyhow.

 

Will you abide our counsel? I again say, my soul for any man's, if they will abide our counsel, that they will go right into heaven. We have all the signs and tokens to give to the porter at the door, and he will let us in.

 

I will ask you as quorums, Do you want Brother Rigdon to stand forward as your leader, your guide, your spokesman. President Rigdon wants me to bring up the other question first, and that is, Does the church want, and is it their only desire to sustain the Twelve as the First Presidency of this people?

 

Here are the Apostles, the Bible, the Book of Mormon, the Doctrine and Covenants—they are written on the tablet of my heart. If the church want the Twelve to stand as the head, the First Presidency of the Church, and at the head of this kingdom in all the world, stand next to Joseph, walk up into their calling, and hold the keys of this kingdom, every man, every women, every quorum is now put in order, and you are now the sole controllers of it.

 

All that are in favor of this, in all the congregation of the saints, manifest it by holding up the right hand. (There was a universal vote). If there are any of the contrary mind, every man and every woman who does not want the Twelve to preside, lift up your hands in like manner. (No hands up). This supersedes the other question, and trying it by quorums.

 

We feel as though we could take Brother Rigdon in our bosom along with us; we want such men as Brother Rigdon. He has been sent away by Brother Joseph to build up a kingdom; let him keep the instructions and calling; let him raise up a mighty kingdom in Pittsburgh, and we will lift up his hands to Almighty God. I think we may have a printing office and a gathering there. If the devil still tries to kill us he will have enough to do.

 

The next is President Marks. Our feelings are to let him stand as president of the stake, as heretofore. We can build the Temple, etc.

 

You did not know who you had amongst you. Joseph so loved this people that he gave his life for them; Hyrum loved his brother and this people unto death. Joseph and Hyrum have given their lives for the church. But very few knew Joseph's character; he loved you unto death—you did not know it until after his death: he has now sealed his testimony with his blood.

 

If the Twelve had been here we would not have seen him given up—he should not have been given up. He was in your midst, but you did not know him; he has been taken away, for the people are not worthy of him.

 

The world is wide. I can preach in England, Ireland, Scotland, France, Germany, etc. I can preach in all the world, and the devils cannot find us. I'll swear to you I will not be given up.

 

There is much to be done. You have men among you who sleep with one eye open. The foundation is laid by our Prophet, and we will build thereon; no other foundation can be laid but that which is laid, and we will have our endowment, if the Lord will.

 

As the authorities do not want us to do military duty, don't do it. If it is necessary, my neck is ready for the knife; as for myself, I am determined to build up the kingdom of God: and by and by there will be a gleaning of grapes, and it may be said, 'To your tents, O Israel'.

 

We can build on the foundation that was laid by the Prophet. Joseph has finished his work, and all the devils in hell and all the mobbers on earth could not take his life until he had accomplished his work. God said, I will put a veil over his eyes and lead him up to the slaughter like a sheep to be killed, for the people are not worthy of him, though God loves this people.

 

Let no man suppose that the kingdom is rent from you; that it is not organized. If all the quorums of the church were slain, except the high priests, they would rise up with the keys of the kingdom, and have the powers of the priesthood upon them, and build up the kingdom, and the devil cannot help himself.

 

You can go to a healthy country, buy the land, and don't let a cursed scoundrel get in your midst. Let there be good men, good women, and whenever a man comes with a wheelbarrow-full of goods don't sell him land, don't let him a house, nor buy of him.

 

Suppose we had ten thousand such places, and increasing in greatness, perfectly free from these poor devils, we should feel better than we do now. Let us all be humble and get our endowments—all be humble, industrious and prudent, what sort of a kingdom would it be? The foundation is laid for more than we can think or talk about today.

 

Is it the will of this congregation that they will be tithed until the Temple is finished, as they have hitherto been? If so, signify it by the uplifted hand. (The vote was unanimous).

 

The men will act that have never acted before, and they will have the power and authority to do it. Is it the mind of this congregation to loose the hands of the Twelve, and enable us to go and preach to all the world? We want to know the feelings of the people. Is it your will to support the Twelve in all the world in their missions? (The congregation sustained this question by a unanimous vote). Will you leave it to the Twelve to dictate about the finances of the church? and will it be the mind of this people that the Twelve teach what will be the duties of the bishops in handling the affairs of the church? I want this, because twelve men can do it just as well as calling this immense congregation together at any other time. (A unanimous vote).

 

We shall have a patriarch, and the right is in the family of Joseph Smith, his brothers, his sons, or some one of his relations. Here is Uncle John, he has been ordained a patriarch. Brother Samuel would have taken the office if he had been alive; it would have been his right; the right is in Uncle John, or one of his brothers (read sec. 3, par. 17, Doctrine and Covenants.)fn I know that it would have belonged to Samuel. But as it is, if you leave it to the Twelve, they will wait until they know who is the man. Will you leave it to the Twelve, and they dictate the matter. (A unanimous vote). I know it will be let alone for the present.

 

I feel to bring up Brother Rigdon; we are of one mind with him and he with us. Will this congregation uphold him in the place he occupies by the prayer of faith and let him be one with us and we with him. (Unanimous). The Twelve will dictate and see to other matters. There will be a committee for the Temple; and now let men stand to their posts and be faithful.'

 

Adjourned to Oct. 6, Conference.

 

Benediction by Elder Parley P. Pratt.

 

Comment of the Church Historians Who Compiled This Data of the Church History

 

Thus closes the History of Joseph Smith, the great Prophet, Seer and Revelator, whom God has chosen to lay the foundation for the establishment of his church and kingdom upon the earth in the last dispensation and fullness of times.

 

He performed as great and mighty a work as any man that ever tabernacled in the flesh, save Jesus only. His mission lasted nearly seventeen years; from the time he received the plates from the angel Moroni on the 22nd day of Sept., 1827, to the 27th of June, 1844, when he was martyred in Carthage Jail, under the pledged protection of the governor of Illinois, Thomas Ford.

 

The History of Joseph Smith is now before the world, and we are satisfied that a history more correct in its details than this was never published. To have it strictly correct, the greatest possible pains have been taken by the historians and clerks engaged in the work. They were eye and ear witnesses of nearly all the transactions recorded in this history, most of which were reported as they transpired, and, where they were not personally present, they have had access to those who were.

 

Moreover, since the death of the Prophet Joseph, the history has been carefully revised under the strict inspection of President Brigham Young, and approved of by him.

 

Testimony of the Church Historians

 

We, therefore, hereby bear our testimony to all the world, unto whom these words shall come, that the History of Joseph Smith is true, and is one of the most authentic histories ever written.

 

We were, much of the time, associated with him in his travels and ministry since he organized the Church of Christ upon the earth. He labored diligently for the salvation and benefit of the human family. He ever taught and practiced, in public and in private, virtue, holiness and truth.

 

His brother Hyrum was martyred at the same time with him. He, also, was a great and good man, a wise counselor to his brother Joseph and a Prophet and Patriarch in the church, and the spirit of his office was with him up to the time of his death.

 

They were slain for the word of God and the testimony of Jesus Christ, and the people and nation who have persecuted them unto death and shed their blood will assuredly find their words fulfilled upon their heads, even in speedy and certain destruction, as were the words of the Savior fulfilled upon the Jewish nation for stoning and killing the Prophets and shedding the blood of the Lord's Anointed.

 

George A. Smith,

W. W. Woodruff, Historians."

 

 

(Joseph Smith, History of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 7 vols., introduction and notes by B. H. Roberts [Salt Lake City: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 1932-1951], 7: 231.)

 

August 1996, Ensign article by Brent Top and Charles Flake “Revelation on Succession”.

 

A vision by Emma Smith:

 

Shortly before her death Emma reported a vision to her nurse in which she saw the Savior and her husband, the Prophet Joseph Smith. She told the nurse that Joseph came to her and said, “Emma, come with me, it is time for you to come with me.” Emma explained, “I put on my bonnet and my shawl and went with him; I did not think that it was anything unusual. I went with him into a mansion, and he showed me through the different apartments of that beautiful mansion.” One room was a nursery in which she found a baby in a cradle. “I knew my babe,” Emma said, “my Don Carlos that was taken from me.” She swept the child up into her arms and cried for joy, but when recovered, stopped to ask, “Joseph, where are the rest of my [children [?]” He assured her, “Emma, be patient and you shall have all of your children.” Emma then related that she saw a personage of light standing by the side of her beloved husband-“even the Lord Jesus Christ.” 21

 

I consider myself more than just an apologist for Emma Hale Smith. She has become almost as much my sister and my friend as if she were my contemporary. Her personal tragedy is haunting and painful to me. Yet the possibility of her reward is joyous to me. Her saga is one of heroic proportions-her great deeds as well as her signal failings are legendary in the Church. I believe the profound lesson of the life of Emma Smith, however, is the manifestation of the triumph of God’s far-reaching mercy and love over human failings. Unlike many heroines of the Restoration, she stumbled and was spiritually and physically left behind. Like Emma, I also grapple with sins and shortcomings that threaten to overcome me at times, and I am grateful to be able to hope that the Lord will do everything he can to find mercy for me and for Emma as well. I have pleaded with members of the Church to refrain from judging her unfairly and condemning her, just as they should any other fellow Saint or human being.

 

 

(Barbara B. Smith and Blythe Darlyn Thatcher, eds., Heroines of the Restoration [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1997], 31.)

 

 

 

 

 

Nauvoo to Winter Quarters 1846

 

May 13, 2004

 

 

I was not in class that night, but Bruce emailed me the lesson notes.

 

Joseph Smith and the West

by Hyrum L. Andrus fn

 

"I did not devise the great scheme of the Lord's opening the way to send this people to these mountains. Joseph Smith contemplated the move for years before it took place, but he could not get here." fn So spoke Brigham Young of the Prophet Joseph Smith's vision of the West, a vision that occupied the Mormon leader's mind as early as 1830. Before Joseph Smith moved Church headquarters from New York to Ohio, he declared that the Saints would colonize the West as part of the work of building up the New Jerusalem.

 

The Mormon view of colonizing the West was directly correlated with the effort the Saints made to build their New Jerusalem. While the Book of Mormon revealed that the city of Zion was to be established upon the western hemisphere, fn the precise location of the New Jerusalem was not immediately made known. In September, 1830, a Revelation declared that it would "be on the border by the Lamanites"--the western border of the United States, near Indian Territory. fn That same Revelation spoke of certain brethren going on a mission among the Indians, or Lamanites. When this mission--consisting of Oliver Cowdery, Parley P. Pratt, Peter Whitmer, Jr., and Richard Ziba Peterson--started westward from Fayette, New York, the following month, they went to preach the Gospel and to "rear up a pillar as a witness where the temple of God shall be built, in the glorious New Jerusalem." fn

 

The Lamanite Mission had more success among certain sympathetic sectarians in Ohio than among the Indians, and several people in the vicinity of Kirtland were converted. Among them was Sidney Rigdon, who, after his conversion, went to see Joseph Smith, in New York. Upon Rigdon's arrival with the details of the conversion that had occurred, the Prophet sent John Whitmer to preside over the new churches in Ohio. In a letter of introduction, Sidney Rigdon also wrote to his fellow converts of the extensive area the Saints would occupy when the New Jerusalem was established; and at the same time, he turned their thoughts toward the West when he said, "The Lord has made known unto us some of the great things which he has laid up for those that love him, among which the fact, a glory of wonders it is, that you are living on the land of promise and that there (at Kirtland) is the place of gathering and from that place to the Pacific Ocean he has given it to us and our children." fn

 

The Painesville Telegraph, Painesville, Ohio, January 18, 1831, gave an early commentary on the Prophet's vision of the West, as it reported John Whitmer's arrival in that area, stating, "The more important part of the mission was to inform the brethren that the boundaries of the promised land, or the New Jerusalem, had just been made known to Smith from God--the township of Kirtland, a few miles west of this is the eastern line and the Pacific Ocean is the western line; if the north and south lines have been described, we have not learned them." fn A Revelation in March, 1831, also expressed Mormonism's westward view when it declared:

 

 Before the great day of the Lord shall come, Jacob [i.e. latter-day Israel, including the Latter-day Saints] shall flourish in the wilderness [i.e. in barren places] and the Lamanites shall blossom as the rose. Zion shall flourish upon the hills and rejoice upon the mountain, and shall be assembled together unto the place which I have appointed. fn

 

In January, 1831, another Revelation likewise declared that Zion was to "rejoice upon the hills and flourish"; fn and yet another stated: "I, the Lord, have made my church in these last days like a judge sitting on a hill, or in a high place, to judge the nations. fn According to Wilford Woodruff, the Prophet made his own commentary on the eventual colonization of the Rocky Mountain area by the Saints, April 26, 1834, when he declared to a group in Kirtland, Ohio:

 

I want to say to you before the Lord, that you know no more concerning the destinies of this Church and Kingdom than a babe upon its mother's lap. You don't comprehend it. It is only a little handful of Priesthood you see here tonight, but this Church will fill North and South America--it will fill the world. It will fill the Rocky Mountains. There will be tens of thousands of Latter-day Saints who will be gathered in the Rocky Mountains and there they will open the door for the establishing of the Gospel among the Lamanites. . .This people will go into the Rocky Mountains; they will there build temples to the Most High. They will raise up a posterity there, and the Latter-day Saints who dwell in these mountains will stand in the flesh until the coming of the Son of Man. The Son of Man will come to them while in the Rocky Mountains. fn

 

The vision of the West continued to fill the mind of the Prophet and his associates. In April, 1836, Erastus Snow was given a blessing "predicting that he should yet be employed in the ministry west of the Rocky Mountains, and should there perform a good work in teaching and leading the Lamanites west of the Rocky Mountains." fn Lorenzo Dow Young also received a blessing that same year under the hands of Hyrum Smith and others, of which he said:

 

Brother Hyrum Smith led, The Spirit rested mightily upon, him and he was full of blessing and prophecy. He said that I should regain my health, live to go with the Saints into the bosom of the Rocky Mountains to build up a place there. fn

 

From the time the Saints were driven from Missouri, Joseph Smith began laying plans for a great Exodus to the Rocky Mountains. This fact is evident from a statement made by Luman Shurtliff, as he entered the Great Basin in 1851:

 

We got into the Salt Lake Valley, September 23, 1851, thankful to the God of Heaven that I and my family were in the valley of the Rocky Mountains--here where the Prophet Joseph Smith had said thirteen years before [in 1838] that the Saints would go if the government did not put a stop to the mobbing and the persecuting of them. fn

 

In a public meeting, April 26, 1846, as the Exodus got underway, Orson Pratt referred to the Prophet's early plans to organize a pioneer company to explore the West and find a location for the Saints:

 

. . . it is years today since we all came out of Missouri. Before that time Joseph the Prophet had this move in contemplation and always said that we would send a company of young men to explore the country and return before the families can go over the mountains; and it is decidedly my mind to do so. fn

 

In a very real way the pioneer company that spearheaded the Exodus, in 1847, had its origin in the inspiration given to Joseph Smith several years before. Lyman Wight corroborated Pratt's testimony, in a letter to Wilford Woodruff, stating that "such a mission was even talked of while in [Liberty] Jail." fn

 

From the evidence at hand it is apparent that Joseph Smith and others were aware that their stay at Nauvoo. Illinois would be brief. As Heber C. Kimball and others were crossing the Mississippi River to Nauvoo, in 1839, Kimball looked upon the site of the new city and said, "It is a very pretty place, but not a long abiding place for the Saints." fn In October, 1840, Wilford Woodruff reflected upon the situation of the Saints, while in England, and reported, "My mind was troubled, for the Spirit manifested unto me much discomfort and persecution among the Saints throughout Europe and America, and that many will fall away; also that the powers that be in America will rise up against the Church and it will be driven." fn During that same year the Prophet's father, Patriarch Joseph Smith, Sr., informed the family of William Huntington, Sr., that the Saints would be in Nauvoo but seven years. "The Lord has told Joseph so," he declared; and after the Saints left Nauvoo they would "go into the Rocky Mountains, right into the midst of the Lamanites." fn

 

The attitude of the Saints at this time was expressed very well by Wilford Woodruff when he wrote in his Journal, "Notwithstanding the Saints are driven from city to city and from place to place, they are determined to build a city wherever their lot is cast, .showing themselves to be industrious and insistent in maintaining the Kingdom of God." fn The following day he reported meeting many old friends from Missouri, and of them said: "They generally felt well and were not discouraged, but felt to trust in God. The Saints felt determined to build up a city wherever they went." fn Oliver B. Huntington registered similar sentiments when he reported:

 

 Joseph finally led us to Nauvoo.

 

Well, and how can we build a Zion here? This is not Missouri.

 

Under Joseph's all-inspiring wonder we quickly resolved that "We would stay here as long as Joseph wants us to--he knows what is best," so we then set to with all our mights to do just what the Prophet Joseph directed and in a few months there was quite a town built up out of as near nothing as God ever made anything. fn

 

It was out of this background that Joseph Smith gave utterance to his most detailed prophecy on the Exodus west. Under date of August 6, 1842, he reported in his Journal that he had crossed the Mississippi to Montrose, Iowa, with others, to witness the installation of certain officers of the Rising Sun Lodge, of the Masonic Order. Said he:

 

While the Deputy Grand-Master was engaged in giving the requisite instructions to the Master-Elect, I had a conversation with a number of brethren in the shade of the building on the subject of our persecutions in Missouri and the constant annoyance which has followed us since we were driven from that state. I prophesied that the Saints would continue to suffer much affliction and would be driven to the Rocky Mountains, many would apostatize, others would be put to death by our persecutors or lose their lives in consequence of exposure or disease, and some of you will live to go and assist in making settlements, and build cities, and see the Saints become a mighty people, in the midst of the Rocky Mountains. fn

 

Anson Call was present and added further details pertaining to this prophecy in the following statement:

 

I had before seen him in a vision and now saw while he was talking his countenance change to white; not the deadly white of a bloodless face, but a living brilliant white. He seemed absorbed in gazing at something at a great distance, and said: "I am gazing upon the valleys of those mountains." This was followed by a vivid description of the scenery of these mountains, as I have since become acquainted with it. Pointing to Shadrach Roundy and others, he said: "There are some men here who shall do a great work in that land." Pointing to me, he said: "There is Anson, he shall go and shall assist in building up cities from one end of the country to the other, and you (rather extending the idea to all those he had spoken of) shall perform as great a work as has been done by man, so that the nations of the earth shall be astonished, and many of them will be gathered in that land and assist in building cities and temples, and Israel shall be made to rejoice."

 

It is impossible to represent in words this scene which is still vivid in my mind of the grandeur of Joseph's appearance, his beautiful descriptions of this land and his wonderful prophetic utterances as they emanated from that glorious inspiration that overshadowed him. There was a force and power in his exclamations of which the following is but a faint echo: "Oh the beauty of those snow-capped mountains! The cool refreshing streams that are running down through those mountain gorges!" Then, gazing in another direction, as if there was a change in locality: "Oh the scenes that this people will pass through! The dead that will lay between here and there!" Then, turning in another direction as if the scene had again changed; "Oh the apostasy that will take place before my brethren reach that land!"But," he continued, "the priesthood shall prevail over all its enemies, triumph over the evil and be established upon the earth never more to be thrown down!" He then charged us with great force and power, to be faithful in those things that had been and should be committed to our charge, with the promise of all the blessings that the priesthood could bestow. "Remember these things and treasure them up. Amen." fn

 

In the closing months of his life, Joseph Smith spent "many hours" conversing about the West. Said he: "If I were only in the Rocky Mountains with a hundred faithful men, I would then be happy, and ask no odds of mobocrats." fn In a letter to Brigham Young, April 8, 1845, Governor Thomas Ford reported having had a conversation with the Prophet on the subject. Said Ford, "I was informed by General Joseph Smith, last summer, that he contemplated a removal west; and from what I learned from him and others at the time, I think if he had lived, he would have begun to move in the matter before this time." fn

 

During the second quarter of the nineteenth century, the great arid regions of the West were but little understood by men east of the Mississippi. In referring to this vast region, they usually spoke in generalities. Information on specific areas was not readily available, so that the Great Salt Lake Basin might be referred to as part of Upper California or as part of the Oregon Territory. According to Joseph Smith, the Saints were to build up cities "from one end of the country to the other." fn But he did not say immediately where their headquarters would be located. This point was not made clear until he and his associates had studied the problem for some time and had considered various alternatives.

 

An anti-Mormon convention of rabid and radical elements, held at Carthage, Illinois, February 17, 1844, stimulated the Prophet to set the machinery in operation for actually. planning and carrying out the Exodus. Three days later he "instructed the Twelve Apostles to send out a delegation and investigate the locations of California and Oregon, and hunt out a good location, where we can remove to after the temple is completed." fn The following day the matter was again discussed; fn and of a meeting held February 23rd, the Prophet wrote:

 

Met with the Twelve in the assembly room concerning the Oregon and California Exploring Exploration; Hyrum and Sidney present. I told them I wanted an exploration of all that mountain country. Perhaps it would be best to go directly to Sante Fe. fn

 

The expedition was to consist of twenty-five humble and prayerful men who could "raise $500, a good horse and mule, a double-barrel gun, one-barrel rifle, and another smooth bore, a saddle and bridle, a pair of revolving pistols, bowie knife, and a good sabre." fn So certain was the Prophet that the Saints would be in the West in a short time that he "prophesied that within five years" the Saints would be out of the power of their enemies, "whether they were apostates or of the world." fn

 

For a time Joseph Smith was persuaded to look toward Texas for a possible location for at least some of the Saints. As a newly founded republic, Texas was anxious to have strong groups of colonists settle the vast uninhabited regions over which she claimed jurisdiction, including the territory between the Nueces and the Rio Grande Rivers. Meanwhile, a group the Prophet had sent to Wisconsin territory to get out lumber for the Temple and the Nauvoo House wrote, proposing that upon completion of their task they remove to "the tablelands of Texas." There they would establish "a place of gathering for all the South and maintain a missionary terminal whence the Gospel might be spread throughout Texas, Brazil, the West Indies, and adjacent areas. fn

 

When George Miller arrived in Nauvoo with the suggestion from the men in the "Pineries," Joseph Smith commented, "I perceive that the Spirit of God is in the pineries as well as here, and we will call together some of our wise men, and proceed to set up the Kingdom of God by organizing some of its officers." fn

 

The organization the Prophet then formulated, March 11, 1844, he referred to as a Special Council, fn and later as the General Council. fn Because of the number who initially held membership therein, it was also known as the Council of Fifty. The General Council was essentially a political body, purporting to be the nucleus council of the municipal department of the Kingdom of God. Its immediate responsibilities included the task of planning for and carrying out the Exodus of the Saints, and of establishing them in the West under a government subject to the United States Constitution. In his Journal, Brigham Young explained:

 

Joseph commenced the organization of a Council for the purpose of taking into consideration the necessary steps to obtain redress for the wrongs which had been inflicted upon us by our persecutors, and also the best manner to settle our people in some distant and unoccupied territory; where we could enjoy our civil and religious rights, without being subject to constant oppression and mobocracy, under the protection of our laws, subject to the Constitution.

 

The Council was composed of about fifty members, several of whom were not members of the Church.

 

We prepared several memorials to Congress for redress of grievances, and used every available means to inform ourselves of the unoccupied territory open to settlers.

 

We held a number of sessions, and investigated the principles upon which our national government is founded; and the true foundation and principles of all governments.

 

Joseph Smith was appointed chairman, William Clayton, clerk, and Willard Richards, historian of the Council. fn

 

The desire expressed by the brethren in Wisconsin apparently was not inconsistent with the Prophets view of colonizing the West at that time, as he immediately commenced negotiations with Texas for an extensive strip of land between the Nueces and the Rio Grande Rivers. And under date of May 3, 1844, Brigham Young and Willard Richards wrote from Nauvoo to Reuben Hedlock, in England, stating, "If any of the brethren wish to go to Texas, we have no particular objection. You may send a hundred thousand there if you can." fn

 

Negotiations with Texas were exploratory. It was first proposed that a stake of Zion be established there, but evidently there was also some talk of moving the Church to that area. fn However, such proposals did not prevent the Prophet from considering other alternatives. At the time negotiations with Texas were going on, he memorialized the Federal Government of the United States for authority to raise a police force of 100,000 men to establish the jurisdiction of the United States throughout the West and to give protection and order to the work of colonization. fn Here was an intelligent proposal of great magnitude. Had it been adopted, the lawlessness of the early West could largely have been minimized; and the Saints would immediately have ceased considering settling in the area of Texas.

 

Meanwhile, the Prophet sent representatives to Washington, D.C. to study the westward move from that point of vantage and to work in behalf of the Saints. Heber C. Kimball wrote to his wife, June 12, 1844, that he and Lyman Wight had presented a petition requesting the Federal Government "to give us some land somewhere in the world, either in Texas, Arizona, or Iowa." fn

 

Orson Pratt, Orson Hyde, and John E. Page were also in the nation's capital in the spring of 1844. About the middle of May, 1844, the Prophet received two letters from Hyde. In one he reported an interview with Senator Stephen A. Douglas and said, "He is ripe for Oregon and the California." Hyde also quoted the Little Giant as declaring that "he would resign his seat in Congress if he could command the force that Mr. Smith could, and would be on the march to the country in a month." fn In the second letter Hyde wrote:

 

Most of the settlers in Oregon and Texas are our old enemies, the mobocrats of Missouri. If, however, the settlement of Oregon or Texas be determined upon, the sooner the move is made the better, and I would not advise any delay for the action of government for there is such a jealousy of our rising power already, that government will do nothing to favor us. . . . .

 

Your superior wisdom must determine whether to go to Oregon, to Texas, or to remain within these United States. fn

 

A few days later Hyde again wrote, discussing in some detail the proposed removal to Texas, and cautioned against it. fn Whether this letter was a determining factor in the Prophet's decision to abandon the Texas proposal is not clear, but the fact remains that after the middle of May until the time of his martyrdom, June 27, 1844, nothing further was said on the matter. fn Instead, existing evidence indicates conclusively that he settled upon the Great Salt Lake Basin as the future headquarters of the Saints. Brigham Young later explained, "When the pioneers left the confines of civilization, we were not seeking a country on the Pacific, neither a country to the north or south; we were seeking a country which had been pointed out by the Prophet Joseph Smith in the midst of the Rocky Mountains, in the interior of the great North American continent." fn

 

With such clarity was the westward move of the Saints to the Rocky Mountains set forth by Joseph Smith that he pointed out in detail the course of their future travels. "One of the pioneers, George H. Goddard,. . . . left on record the statement that he was present in the Masonic Hall in Nauvoo when Joseph Smith mapped out on the floor with a piece of chalk the Great Basin of western America, indicating the course they would follow across the continent." fn Hopkins C. Pendar also reported that "Joseph Smith just before he was killed, made a that "Joseph Smith just before he was killed, made a sketch of the future home of the Saints in the Rocky Mountains and their route or road to that country as he had seen [it] in vision; a map or drawing of it." Levi W. Hancock either made this map as Joseph Smith pointed out the way or drew a copy of one made by the Prophet, from which other copies were made. Brigham Young kept one copy, and "one was carried by the Mormon Battalion by which they knew where to find the Church, or, Salt Lake Valley." fn Mosiah Hancock, son of Levi, threw further light on this matter when he reported a visit by Joseph Smith to his father's home, immediately before his departure for Carthage:

 

. . . the Prophet came to our home and stopped in our carpenter shop and stood by the turning lathe I went and got my map for him. "Now," said he, "I will show you the travels of this people." He then showed our travels thru Iowa, and said, "Here you will make a place for the winter; and here you will travel west until you come to the valley of the Great Salt Lake! You will build cities to the North and to the South, and to the East and to the West; and you will become a great and wealthy people in that land." fn

 

In light of these reports, the testimony of William Henry Kimball, son of Heber C. Kimball, is significant. Kimball wrote that he was present in the home of Stephen Winchester, in Nauvoo, with twenty-five others, when Joseph Smith spoke of his coming martyrdom; and "then and there he mapped [out] the life and Acts of Brigham Young until [his] death." Said Kimball, "I can assure you it never failed in one instance; I have witnessed the fulfillment of all of the prophecy to a letter and act." fn

 

The westward move predominated in the Prophet's thinking during the closing days of his life. To the Nauvoo Legion he said, June 22, 1844, "Your mission will be to the nations of the earth. You will gather many people into the fastness of the Rocky Mountains." fn That evening as he considered the growing possibility that they would be martyred if they fell into the hands of their enemies, Joseph's countenance brightened and he exclaimed:

 

The way is open. It is clear to my mind what to do. All they want is Hyrum and myself; then tell everyone to go about their business, and not to collect in groups, but to scatter about. . . We will cross the river tonight, and go away to the West. fn

 

The History of the Church makes this further report: "About 9 p.m. Hyrum came out of the Mansion and gave his hand to Reynolds Cahoon, at the same time saying, 'A company of men are seeking to kill brother Joseph, and the Lord has warned him to flee to the Rocky Mountains to save his life.'" fn After the Prophet and others had crossed the river, Orrin P. Rockwell was sent back to Nauvoo to obtain horses for the journey, with instructions to be "ready to start for the Great Basin in the Rocky Mountains." fn But when certain brethren accused the Prophet of cowardice for leaving the Saints, he returned to Nauvoo. Before giving himself up, he assembled the Legion and instructed and cautioned them again:

 

I will therefore say to you Saints and Elders of Israel, be not troubled nor give yourselves uneasiness so as to make rash moves by which you may be cut short in preaching the gospel to this generation, for you will be called upon to go forth and call upon. . . free men. . . to gather themselves in the strongholds of the Rocky Mountains. fn

 

With the vision of the westward move of the Saints in his mind, Joseph Smith went to Carthage, to a martyr's death. And as the pioneer company arrived in the Great Basin three years later, to fulfill that vision, Brigham Young explained, "We have come here according to the direction and counsel of Brother Joseph; before his death." fn

 

After the death of Joseph Smith, the General Council, under the leadership of Brigham Young, continued to make plans for the Exodus. Several entries in Brigham Young's Journal indicate the nature and extent of the Council's activities at that time. On March 18, 1845, Brigham Young met with that body all day; fn and again on the 22nd. fn In the latter meeting, "the subject of the western mission was considered and occupied the most of the day." fn Several other meetings were also held that spring. fn

 

On September 9, 1845, the General Council Resolved that a company of 1500 men be selected to go to Great Salt Lake Valley and that a committee of five be appointed to gather information relative to migration, and report the same to the council." fn Here is further evidence that before the Saints left Nauvoo they knew where they were to settle in the West. And here they sought again to send out a pioneer body that could prepare the way for the Saints to follow, as outlined by Joseph Smith several years before.

 

In preparing for the Exodus, the General Council selected twenty-five men as Captains of Hundreds, "whose business it was severally to select one hundred families and see that they were prepared for a journey across the Rocky Mountains." The Captains of Hundreds then selected their own Captains of Fifties, Captains of Tens, Clerks, etc. fn As the Exodus commenced, this initial organization was revised, first, at Sugar Creek, about seven miles west of Nauvoo; second, at Richardson's Point, some fifty-five miles from Nauvoo; and, then, at the Chariton River. fn

 

"As a legislature of the people," Benjamin F. Johnson noted that the General Council directed "all general movements relating to our Exodus as a people from Nauvoo." fn Because the Council functioned in the Exodus as a political organ among the Saints, Ezra T. Benson, a prominent member therein, looked upon the Saints as they moved west as "a distinct nation." fn It was this body that determined the route the Saints were to travel, and cared for the needs of the people as they traveled, as the minutes of a meeting held by the Council, February 22, 1846, illustrate:

 

In the forenoon, Chas. C. Rich, who had the day previous been appointed to look after the grains and provider, reported. . . to the council. . . .

 

Second, the subject of policy and economy was up before the council and decided that the camp should be called together and they be instructed to stop using such articles as will be most suitable to take on the road. . . .

 

Third, J. D. Lee, by request of Willard Richards, presented a bill of tin brought into the camp by Wm. F. Cahoon (before the council), amounting to $53 and some cents, which he proposed to sell by wholesale at a discount of 15 per cent. . . .

 

Fourth, the council [decided] that all reports of corn, grain, provisions, wagons, teams, etc., be handed to J. D. Lee. fn

 

Several members of the General Council were assigned to key positions in the various companies. But while this arrangement gave central direction to the Exodus, it made it difficult at times for all members of the council to get together. At times, then, only those readily available would meet. The minutes of such meetings very often specify those of the Quorum of the Twelve and others of the General Council who were present, as in the meeting of April 2, 1846:

 

At 11 a.m. a convention of the council met some 200 yards south of the encampment.[Pres[ent] of the Twelve: B. Young, H. C. Kimball, O. Pratt, P. P. Pratt, G. A. Smith. Father John Smith, Bishop [George] Miller, A. P. Rockwood, Shadrach Roundy, B. F. Johnson [and] J. D. Lee [were also present] of the council of the YTFIF [i.e. Fifty], Capt. Stuart, Winter, Benson and others. Several letters were laid before the council and one letter was answered to Elder O. Hyde. . . . Council also decided that the camp roll on 5 miles this evening. fn

 

At a meeting of the Council, May 20, 1846, another effort was made to send a pioneer company ahead; but again circumstances prevented. The following month the Federal Government called upon the Saints for 500 men to fight in the war with Mexico. The General Council made the decision to recruit the Mormon Battalion. fn

 

The final arrangements for moving the Saints to the Great Basin were made at Winter Quarters. To this end a series of meetings was held by the General Council, beginning December 25, 1846, and continuing through the 27th. Brigham Young wrote, in a letter to Charles C. Rich, January 4, 1847, that the Council decided to "send on a pioneer company as early as possible with plows, seed, grain, etc." Other companies were to follow. fn

 

The departure of the pioneer company for the Great Basin terminated the meetings of the General Council for a time; and as clerk of the Council, William Clayton delivered "the records of the K. of G. [Kingdom of God]" to Brigham young. fn As the pioneer company moved toward its destination, President Young spoke of their ideal of universal peace under the Kingdom of God, the foundations of which they were going west to establish:

 

I would say to you brethren, and to the Elders of Israel, if you are faithful, you will yet be sent to preach this Gospel to the nations of the earth and to bid all welcome whether they believe the Gospel or not, and this kingdom will reign over many who do not belong to the Church, over thousands who do not believe in the Gospel. Bye and bye every knee. . . . shall bow and every tongue confess and acknowledge and reverence and honor the name of God and His priesthood and observe the laws of the kingdom whether they belong to the Church and obey the Gospel or not, and I mean that every man in this company shall do it. That is what the scripture means by every knee shall bow, etc., and you cannot make anything else of it. fn

 

Orson Pratt later referred to the feelings he experienced when the pioneer company arrived in the Great Basin, when he commented, "I felt as though it was the place for which we had so long sought." fn

 

When the company reached Salt Lake Valley, a High Council was organized to hold jurisdiction in the Valley after Brigham Young and others returned to Winter Quarters. John Smith, Charles C. Rich, and John Young were appointed to preside as the new Stake Presidency. As members of the General Council, John Smith and Charles C. Rich could act in both a civil and an ecclesiastical capacity. fn This, however, was but a temporary arrangement, and those who remained in the valley looked forward to the time when the General Council would assume the responsibility of dispensing law and order in the area. In a meeting held October 10, 1847, they discussed the High Council's authority in the light of the greater powers reposed in the General Council:

 

P. P. Pratt told of the government of the Stake: the Prest., his Counselors and the High Council. Here the High Council has to attend to temporal as well as spiritual matters, for we have no county and state officers, etc.. . . [We] need a law to prevent men from settling in a scattered manner and to prevent cutting green timber; and all such laws will .be for the people of this stake for the time being. No one quorum has power to give eternal laws for this people but a greater council which[contains[includes] the Twelve may do this. . . The council above named will regulate this matter as soon as they come up and sit. . . .

 

 John Taylor stated that P. P. Pratt had told the truth with regard to organization and law, etc., and there were as many as 20 or thereabouts present who knew it. . . fn

 

After Brigham Young and other members of the General Council were permanently settled in the Great Basin, the Council commenced again to direct the civic affairs of the people. On December 9, 1848, they met and discussed the propriety of petitioning the federal government for a territorial government, with officers of their "own nomination." Territorial boundaries were discussed and the name Deseret proposed. Brigham Young was nominated governor; Willard Richards, secretary; Heber C. Kimball, chief judge; Newel K. Whitney and Parley P. Pratt, associate judges; and John M. Bernhisel, marshal. fn With certain alterations, these proposed officers were later established in office within the provincial State of Deseret. The General Council also organized itself into the provincial legislature of that government about the time the above nominations were made; and, thus, Joseph Smith's plan for establishing the Saints in the Great Basin came to fruition. fn Indeed, with reference to the State of Deseret, Brigham Young could say, "Joseph Smith organized this government before, in Nauvoo." fn

 

So well did the General Council do its work, during the winter of 1848-49, that when the State of Deseret was officially organized, in July, 1849, there was no immediate business for the new government to consider. The first session of the legislature was primarily concerned with other matters. As for the State's proposed constitution, it was an ideal. John M. Bernhisel wrote to Brigham Young from Washington, October 2, 1850, stating, "The Constitution of Deseret was much admired by statesmen here, not only as being very ably written, but was regarded as the best Constitution of the Country." fn There have been few, if any, organs of government that can boast of so orderly and intelligent a beginning. It is a credit to Joseph Smith that the guiding principles he set forth and the organization developed therefrom should result in so orderly a formation of government in the West, and that the end-product should receive such acclaim.

 

[Graphic omitted: See source document.]

 

Dr. Andrus is associate professor of religion and social science at Brigham Young University.

 

Journal of Discourses, IV, 41. Hereafter abbreviated J. D.

 

See III Nephi 21; Ether 13.

 

Doctrine and Covenants 28:9. Hereafter abbreviated D. & C.

 

Journal History, October, 1830. Hereafter abbreviated J.H. Said the Painesville Telegraph, November 16, 1830, "Some persons came along here last week with a Golden Bible. One of them, Cowdery, declared he had seen and conversed with angels. He was bound on a divine mission to regions beyond the Mississippi where he contemplated founding a City of Refuge."

 

Daniel P. Kidder, Mormonism and Mormons, pp. 77-79. (Italics by the writer.)

 

Italics by the writer.

 

D&C 49:24-25.

 

Ibid., 39-13.

 

Ibid., 64:37 ff. In commenting upon these statements in 1853, Orson Pratt said:

Thus we see that twenty-two years ago, it was foretold in great plainness that Zion should flourish and rejoice upon the hills and mountains: when these prophecies were given, we did not know, for many years, how nor when the Lord intended to fulfill them; but fifteen years after the predictions, the Lord suffered our enemies to rise against us and we were driven by the force of arms from those States, and were obliged to flee to the mountains for refuge; thus, in an unexpected manner, Zion is placed in her appropriate position, and is truly beginning to flourish and rejoice upon the hills and mountains, according to the predictions of Joseph the Prophet, and according to many predictions of the ancient prophets.--The Seer, I (January, 1853), 6-7.

Joseph F. Smith also made reference to the same subject and inquired:

Who, let me ask, unless he was inspired of the Lord, speaking by the gift and power of God, at that remote period of the Church's history, when our numbers were few, when we had no influence, name or standing in the world--who, I would ask, under the circumstances in which we were placed when this prediction was made, could have uttered such words unless God inspired him? Zion is, indeed, flourishing on the hills, and is rejoicing on the mountains, and we who compose it are gathering and assembling together unto the place appointed . . . If there were no other prophecy uttered by Joseph Smith, fulfillment of which could be pointed to, this alone would be sufficient to entitle him to the claim of being a true prophet. -- J.D., XXV, 97-98.

 

Conference Report, April 8, 1898, p. 57.

 

"Autobiography of Erastus Snow," dictated to his son, Franklin R. Snow. Quoted in Joseph William Olsen, "Biography of Erastus Snow," unpublished master's thesis, Brigham Young University, 1935, p. 19.

 

James Amasa Little, "Biography of Lorenzo Dow Young," Utah Historical Quarterly, XIV (1946), 46.

 

"Biographical Sketch of the Life of Luman Andros Shurtliff, 1807-1864," under date. Taken from his personal journal, a copy of which is on file in the Church Historian's Office, Salt Lake City, Utah.

 

"Diary of John D. Lee, 1844, 1846, 1850-1851," under the above date, Typewritten copy in Brigham Young University Library. (Italics by the writer.)

 

Letter written by Lyman Wight to Wilford Woodruff, dated August 24,1857, at Mountain Valley, Texas. Letter on file in Church Historian's Office, Salt Lake City, Utah. Wight was with Joseph Smith in Liberty Jail.

 

Helen Mar Whitney, Woman's Exponent, Salt Lake City, IX (July 1, 1880), 18.

 

Matthias F. Cowley, Wilford Woodruff, (Salt Lake City, 1909), p. 153.

 

"Diary of Oliver B. Huntington, 1847-1900," Typewritten copy in Brigham Young University Library, Part II, 210; Young Woman's Journal, II, 314-315.

 

J. H., May 18, 1839.

 

Ibid., May 19, 1839.

 

Young Woman's Journal. 11, 314-315. Brigham Young expressed a common attitude among the saints when he said:

If I knew that I was going to burn all my buildings next season, it would not hinder me for one hour from making improvements. The more I do, the more I shall be prepared to do. And I am determined to prepare to lay up the walls of Zion and to learn all I can, so that, if I should happen to be one of the men to engage in that work, I shall know how to commence and dictate the foundation of the walls of Zion and those of the Temple.--L.D., V, 170.

 

History of the Church, V, 85-86.

 

Edward W. Tullidge, History of Northern Utah and Southern Idaho: Biographical Supplement, pp. 271-272.

 

J.D., XI, 16.

 

J.H., under date.

 

Tullidge, op. cit.

 

History of the Church, VI, 222.

 

Ibid., p. 223. Under date of February 21, 1844, Wilford Woodruff wrote:

I met with the Quorum of the Twelve at Joseph's store, and according to Joseph's counsel a company was selected to go on an exploring expedition to California, and to select a place for the building of a city. Jonathan Dunham, Daniel Fullmer, Phineas Young, Samuel W. Richards and several others were named for the expedition--Cowley, op. cit., p. 199.

 

Ibid., p. 224.

 

Ibid.

 

Ibid., p. 225.

 

Ibid. pp. 256-258.

 

George Miller, Sr., and George Miller, Jr., A Mormon Bishop and His Son, Fragments of a Diary kept by George Miller, St., Bishop in the Mormon Church, and some records of incidents in the life of the G. Miller, Jr., Hunter and Pathfinder, ed. H. M. Mills (London, England, nd.), p. 48.

 

See History of the Church, VI, 260-61,263, 264.

 

See ibid., pp. 274, 343, 356, etc.

 

"History of Brigham Young," Millennial Star, XXVI, 328-329. For evidence that the General Council and The Council of Fifty were the same body, see Willard Richard's Journal, March 22, 25, 1845; April 15, 22, 29, 1845, etc., and compare with meeting dates of the General Council, as reported in the History of the Church. Original Journal of Willard Richards is on file in the Church Historian's Office, Salt Lake City, Utah.

 

Ibid., p. 345.

 

For further information on this subject, see Hyrum L. Andrus, Joseph Smith and World Government (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Company, 1958), Chapter II.

 

History of the Church, VI, 274, 275-277, 281-282, 369.

 

Whitney, op. cit., XI (January 1, 1883), 114. The issue of redress for the loss of lands purchased from the federal government in Missouri was involved in this petition, which explains their request for land.

 

History of the Church, VI, 373-374. Douglas also supplied Hyde with a copy of John C. Fremont's map of Oregon, with his report of the West. Ibid., p. 375.

 

J. H., April 25, 1844.

 

See J. H., April 30, 1844.

 

Had the Saints gone to Texas, to the area proposed, they would undoubtedly have formed their own political government, separate from the republic of Texas or the government of Mexico; territorial status under the United States in that area would also have been virtually impossible under existing circumstances. Knowing this, the Prophet and his associates voted, May 6, 1844, to send Almon W. Babbitt to France. Undoubtedly, his mission was to feel out the French government to determine the course it would follow toward such a new government. But Babbitt never left Nauvoo. The indication is that shortly after his appointment the whole idea was abandoned. See Andrus, op. cit., pp. 62-63.

 

The points at issue and the proposed resolutions were not precisely the same each year with each of the four questions, as the occasional unanimous agreement indicates. These four were selected, however, because they were perennials in which the issues did to a large extent remain homogeneous from year to year.

 

E. Cecil McGavin, Nauvoo the Beautiful (Salt Lake City, 1946), p. 127.

 

"Diary of Oliver B. Huntington," II, 425

 

"The Life Story of Mosiah Lyman Hancock," typewritten copy in Brigham Young University Library, pp. 27-29.

 

Letter of William Henry Kimball to Emmeline B. Wells, written at Coalville City, Summit County, Utah, January 20, 1907. Original on file in Church Historian's Office, Salt Lake City, Utah. The writer has corrected certain errors in spelling and punctuation.

 

The writer has located two independent sources that give almost verbatim accounts of this address. Samuel Holister Rogers, who was present, gave one report. See "Journal of Samuel Holister Rogers," typewritten copy, Brigham Young University Library, pp. 198-201. William Pace, who was present as a lad in his early teens, also reported the address and then adds, "I am indebted to Alfred Bell of Lehi, Utah, for the above . . . taken on the spot by him, and supposed to be very correct" See "Diary of William Byran Pace and Biography of his father James Pace," typewritten copy, Brigham Young University Library, pp. 3-6. Wandle Mace also gave a partial report of this address in which the above quoted portion is found. See "Journal of Wandle Mace, 1809, 1890," typewritten copy, Brigham Young University Library, p. 131. The Journal History for this date merely reports, "Legion met as usual; and after receiving instructions, were dismissed until 6 p.m., when they met again."

 

History of the Church, VI, 545-546.

 

Ibid., p. 547.

 

Ibid., p. 548. (Italics by the writer.)

 

"Journal of Samuel Holister Rogers," op. cit. and "Diary of William Byran Pace," op. cit. The writer's comment on the Prophet's previous address to the Legion is also applicable here. The History of the Church reports that the Prophet spoke to the Legion on this date, but does not report his comments. See History of the Church, VI, 557.

 

J. H., July 28, 1847.

 

History of the Church, VII, 387.

 

Ibid., pp. 387-388.

 

Ibid., In his Journal, under date, Willard Richards specifically reports this meeting as being held by the Council of Fifty.

 

In his Journal, Willard Richards reports meetings of the Council of Fifty on the following dates: March 25, April 15, April 22, April 29, May 6, and May 10,1845.

 

History of the Church, VII, 439. See also pp. 454-455.

 

J.H. March 27, 1846.

 

See John D. Lee, "Diaries and Official Records of John D. Lee, 1844-1846, 1850-1851, 1861-1878." Unpublished diaries, minutes, etc., kept by Lee (not complete), Brigham Young University Library, under February 17, 1846, March 9, 1846; J. H., March 27, 1848.

 

Benjamin F. Johnson, "An Interesting Letter," unpublished letter from Johnson to George S. Gibbs, April to July, 1903, Brigham Young University Library pp. 9, 23. Johnson was a member of the Council.

 

Journals of John D. Lee, ed. Charles Kelley (Salt Lake City, 1938), p. 25.

 

"Diary of John D. Lee, 1844, 1846, 1850-1851," February 22, 1846.

 

Ibid., under date. See also the meetings held April 18 and May 20, 1846.

 

Miller, op. cit., p. 24; Johnson to Gibbs, pp. 22-23. See also William Clayton's Journal, pp. 50-54; J. H., July 13, 1846.

 

J. H., December 25, 26, 27, 1846; Miller, op. Titus, pp. 28-29.

 

William Clayton's Journal, p. 74. Clayton reported that in the pioneer company there were the following men who were members of the General Council: Brigham Young, Heber C. Kimball, Willard Richards, Orson Pratt, George A. Smith, Wilford Woodruff, Amasa Lyman, Ezra T. Benson, Phineas H. Young, John Pack, Charles Shumway, Shadrach Roundy, Albert P. Rockwood, Erastus Snow, William Clayton, Thomas Bullock, Albert Cartington, and Orrin Porter Rockwell. See Ibid., pp. 202-203.

 

Ibid., pp. 195-196.

 

J. D., XII, 88.

 

John Young was made a member of the General Council, January 20, 1849. See J. H., under date.

 

Charles C. Rich's Journal, under date. Original on file in Church Historian's Office. (Italics by the writer. )

 

J. H., December 9, 1848; John D. Lee, A Mormon Chronicle: The Diaries of John D. Lee, 1848-1876, ed. Robert Class Cleland and Juanita Brooks (San Marino, California, 1955), I, 80-82.

 

See Andrus, op. cit., pp. 91 ff.

 

J.H., January 19, 1863.

 

Cited in Andrew Love Neff, History of Utah (Salt Lake City, 1940), pp. 118-119.

 

 

(Joseph Smith and the West by Hyrum L. Andrus Fn, BYU Studies, vols. 1-2 (1959-1960), Volume 2, Number 2-Spring and Summer 1960 129.)

 

The Pioneer Trek:
Nauvoo to Winter Quarters

By William G. Hartley

Latter-day Saints did not leave Nauvoo, Illinois, in 1846 in one mass exodus led by President Brigham Young but primarily in three separate groups—in winter, spring, and fall.

William G. Hartley, “The Pioneer Trek: Nauvoo to Winter Quarters,” Ensign, June 1997, 31
The Latter-day Saints’ epic evacuation from Nauvoo, Illinois, in 1846 may be better understood by comparing it to a three-act play. Act 1, the winter exodus, was President Brigham Young’s well-known Camp of Israel trek across Iowa from 1 March to 13 June 1846, involving perhaps 3,000 Saints. Their journey has been researched thoroughly and often stands as the story of the Latter-day Saints’ exodus from Nauvoo. 1 Act 2, the spring exodus, which history seems to have overlooked, showed three huge waves departing Nauvoo, involving some 10,000 Saints, more than triple the number in the winter departure. Act 3, the fall exodus, has been studied only in part. It involved about 700 Saints, mostly poor, forced from Nauvoo at gunpoint. What follows is an overview of what we now know about these three phases of the 1846 exodus.

Original Plan Was for Spring Departure

On 11 October 1845, Brigham Young, President and senior member of the Church’s governing Quorum of Twelve Apostles, responded in behalf of the Brethren to anti-Mormon rhetoric, arson, and assaults in September. He appointed captains for 25 companies of 100 wagons each and requested each company to build its own wagons to roll west in one massive 2,500-wagon caravan the next spring. 2 Church leaders instructed members outside of Illinois to come to Nauvoo in time to move west in the spring.

At its peak, Nauvoo had close to 12,000 people. 3 Another 2,000 to 3,000 lived nearby in Illinois and Iowa. A few hundred new arrivals came by the time of the exoduses, so a reasonable estimate is that 15,000 to 16,000 Saints in Iowa and Illinois were eligible to join the migration. Instructions for the trek asked people to bring enough food per wagon for five adults or the equivalent, which means that, adding children, each wagon on average probably had six people assigned to it. With six per wagon, 2,500 wagons would assist about 15,000 people. Some doubling up of friends, relatives, or single adults was expected. By 23 November 1845, reports indicated that 3,285 families were organized for the trek—800 more families than wagons. 4 By then the Saints were doing their all to prepare to leave in the spring. 5

During January 1846, the Brethren proposed that a smaller group go in early spring, ahead of the main body. 6 Thus by 24 January, President Young planned to start with a company of young men and a few families and travel until they could find a good location to put in crops. “Any who want to go are welcome to go,” he said. 7

Act 1: The Winter Exodus

By January’s end, LDS leaders heard of disturbing threats about attacks on Nauvoo, arrests of the Twelve, destruction of the Nauvoo Temple, stealing of wagons “to prevent us from moving west,” Illinois governor Thomas Ford’s sending troops into Nauvoo to enforce arrest warrants, and other designs to prosecute and persecute the Mormons. 8 Taking all of these threats seriously, the Twelve decided to leave quickly—partly for their own well-being and partly to remove themselves as a target that might bring attacks and result in harm to other Latter-day Saints. So departures started early, in February 1846 instead of springtime. This broke up the previous plan of organization, and what was expected to be a small, orderly group soon swelled to an unwieldy size. Winter departures caused family separations. “We bade our children and friends goodbye and started for the West,” wrote midwife Patty Sessions. 9

The winter exodus of the Camp of Israel involved about 3,000 Saints and nearly 500 wagons, although 100 wagons returned to Nauvoo during March to help move other Saints. 10 They journeyed 300 miles across southern Iowa, a three-and-a-half month trek. Their route is now designated as Iowa’s segment of the 1,300-mile-long Mormon Pioneer National Historic Trail and is well mapped and marked. 11 Histories of this group draw from many records, including diaries kept by William Clayton, William Huntington, John D. Lee, Eliza Lyman, Elder Orson Pratt, Elder Willard Richards, Patty Sessions, John Smith, Eliza R. Snow, Horace K. Whitney, President Brigham Young, and Lorenzo Dow Young. 12

On 4 February Nauvoo resident Charles Shumway ferried across the Mississippi River, starting the winter exodus. For three weeks, while temperatures plummeted, wagons ferried across, often dodging ice chunks, and then scores crossed on solid ice after Charles C. Rich walked across the Mississippi on 25 February. These travelers camped at the ever-expanding campground along Sugar Creek, seven miles inland. They braved cold temperatures and snow. Campfires burned constantly. “The wind blows, one can hardly get to the fire for the smoke,” Patty Sessions noted on the 19th. While organizing the people into subcompanies and developing camp and travel rules, President Brigham Young sent ahead a vanguard of strong “pioneers,” led by Bishop George Miller, to improve roads and bridges, locate campsites, and collect firewood.

On 1 March the Camp of Israel started moving west through Iowa Territory. Were it springtime, with grasses for cattle feed, they would have moved up existing roads partway toward present-day Des Moines before crossing the Des Moines River. But, it being winter, they chose to hug the Missouri border so they could obtain needed food for themselves and feed for their animals from Missouri settlers. On day five, at the village of Bonaparte, they forded the Des Moines River on a submerged rock ledge. While crossing, Eliza R. Snow “slung a tin cup on a string and drew some water which was a very refreshing draught.” Many Saints took grain to the Bonaparte Mills to obtain flour for the trek.

The companies made an extended stop (7-18 March) at Richardson’s Point, 22 miles west of Bonaparte. While stopped, men found work “such as building houses, chopping timber, splitting rails, husking corn,” wrote William Huntington. Meanwhile, Captain William Pitt’s Nauvoo Brass Band had been presenting concerts for pay at Farmington and in Keosauqua inside the Van Buren County courthouse.

Moving northwesterly along the Fox River, the companies passed just north of Bloomfield. “The cold more intense insomuch that we were obliged to close the front of the wagon,” Sister Snow complained. They turned southward (at present-day Drakesville), crossed the Fox, and veered southwesterly toward the Missouri border. Briefly they followed the Old Mormon Trace, blazed in 1838 by Latter-day Saints fleeing Missouri. By then their plan was to move through the north edge of Missouri and cross the Missouri River at Banks Ferry, above St. Joseph, Missouri, and join the Oregon Trail west of there.

March snow, cold, rain, and awful mud made the trek miserable and exhausting. To cross the steep-banked Chariton River, they double-teamed the wagons to descend and ascend the muddy banks. “I spent the day helping the teams till I was so sore and tired I could scarcely walk,” William Clayton wrote. They established Chariton Camp (south of present-day Centerville) for an extended stop, 22-31 March. “The mud of our street and about our fires, in our tents etc. is indescribable,” Sister Snow said on 25 March. President Young recorded that late March storms and cold caused “severe colds” among the campers. While encamped, President Young regrouped the 400 or fewer wagons into six better-structured units of 50 or more wagons each.

When they left Chariton Camp on 1 April, they exited Iowa’s last organized county and moved into what could be called wilderness but still followed rudimentary roads. They made slow progress, being hampered by rain and mud. “Brother Brigham came up with his company driving his team in mud to his knees as happy as a king,” Patty Sessions said. By 9 April, roads were impassable. “Doubling and thribling teams but to no effect,” Huntington wrote. “Many wagons were left stalled in the mud in every direction. Many families remained on the prairie over the night without fire [and] with their clothing wet.”

On 6-15 April the companies camped by Locust Creek, three miles above the Missouri border. 13 On 15 April, Englishman William Clayton, excited by news from Nauvoo of the birth of his son, wrote celebratory words to the English song “All Is Well.” His song became the Latter-day Saint pioneer anthem “Come, Come, Ye Saints.” 14 Ever since the Richardson’s Point camp, Latter-day Saint traders were constantly going into Missouri to trade at farms and hamlets. Changing the route, leaders decided to turn northwesterly and to cross the Missouri River at Kanesville (present-day Council Bluffs, Iowa).

On the move again, by mid-April the travelers saw prairie grasses sprouting, trees leafing out, rattlesnakes slithering around, and in their companies “many cases of measles and mumps.” 15 At the headwaters of the Weldon Fork River, they made an extended stop, from 24 April to 12 May, and created Garden Grove, the first temporary settlement along the way, on recently opened free federal lands. Starting on 27 April, leaders created work parties to split rails, cut logs for cabins, build a bridge, dig wells, make plow handles, and herd flocks. After a day’s work, Saints ate supper and, weather permitting, enjoyed dancing and singing. Log cabins soon lined both ends of a common farm. 16

Leaving people there to farm and develop the settlement, the Camp of Israel pushed on to the Grand River. There they stayed from 18 May to 1 June and established a second temporary settlement, Mount Pisgah, with cabins, farms, and fences. On 30 May, President Young and other leaders rode out three miles, set up two tents, and prayed, seeking divine help for the journey and for Saints still in Nauvoo. 17

On 1 June the Camp of Israel moved on, leaving hundreds who lacked teams and supplies needed to push on for the Rocky Mountains that summer. By then President Young’s company was being enlarged constantly by spring exodus arrivals. After passing a Pottawattamie village (west of present-day Lewis, Iowa) on 8 June, they encountered several rugged streams they had to bridge before moving on. Finally, on 13 June, the lead wagons halted in view of the Missouri River at present-day Council Bluffs. “Camped, plenty of strawberries,” Patty Sessions wrote that day.

During subsequent weeks, successive wagon companies arrived from Nauvoo and camped next to previous arrivals, creating a long “Grand Encampment” 18 stretching about nine miles eastward from President Young’s camp. Saints waited while workmen built a ferryboat to move wagons across the Missouri. By early July, stymied by slow ferrying, leaders realized that the constant delays had slowed them down too much, and they canceled plans to send an advance company to the mountains that year. Then, when U.S. Army recruiters from Fort Leavenworth enlisted 500 men in a Mormon Battalion for Mexican War service, leaders knew that the manpower loss meant they must winter the Latter-day Saint refugees there along the river. By September, they set up a main encampment, Winter Quarters, in present-day Florence, Nebraska (on Omaha’s north edge). Some 4,000 to 5,000 Saints stayed there. Many more, however, wintered in small clusters all across southwest Iowa. 19

The Camp of Israel trek was as heroic as it was historic. It was punctuated by sacrifice, sorrows, deaths, stressful travel situations, devout prayers and hymns, band music, good humor, and optimism. Histories about the Nauvoo exodus concentrate on the Camp of Israel rather than on the later departures for several good reasons: (1) it was the first wave of people who left Nauvoo en masse; (2) it pioneered several stretches of the route and various travel methods; (3) it contained the Church’s leaders, including most of the Twelve, and was the decision-making group for the entire exodus; (4) it was an organized caravan that shared a collective, common history; and (5) its experiences are well described in diary entries and later recollections.

Act 2: The Spring Exodus

During April, May, and June 1846, three times as many Saints left Nauvoo as went with President Brigham Young’s advance group. Among the 10,000 spring evacuees were Apostles Wilford Woodruff and Orson Hyde, many of the 300 men who had been guards and pioneers in the Camp of Israel who now had returned to Nauvoo for their families, workmen who had finished the Nauvoo Temple, and new LDS arrivals from out of state. Because of grass and springtime weather, their treks across Iowa took only 4 to 5 weeks, compared to the Camp of Israel’s 14 weeks.

Economic, health, and family difficulties prevented these people from leaving sooner. Thousands had trouble obtaining adequate outfits and provisions. They counted on selling, bartering, buying, and luck. When they tried to market their farms, houses, livestock, furniture, utensils, dishes, clocks, books, and other nonessentials, they found many sellers but few buyers. Most Saints sold or traded for pittances, suffering major financial losses. Ethan Barrows, for example, wrote, “[I] could not sell my house and lot, nor any of my furniture.” 20 The Leavitt family received only “a yoke of wild steers” for their “beautiful farm.” 21 Some had to pay off debts; others had to collect debts.

Ill health, too, slowed departures. Isaac Haight said that in February his company headed west “before my health was so that I could go with them,” so he did not leave until June. 22 Amasa Lyman left in February, but his expectant wife, Maria, stayed behind, gave birth to a son, and left with her four children in June. 23 People delayed, too, while waiting for relatives not ready, not willing to go, or not yet in Nauvoo. Reddick Allred, one of the advance pioneers, returned from Garden Grove and “found my folks on the Iowa side of the river opposite Nauvoo being unable to move till I returned.” 24 A Pennsylvanian and a Canadian company were among Saints who reached Nauvoo in May and joined the spring departures. 25

March. President Young placed leadership in Nauvoo upon his brother, Elder Joseph W. Young, senior president of the Seventy, and Elder Orson Hyde. He instructed three trustees—Bishop Joseph L. Heywood, John S. Fullmer, and Almon W. Babbitt—to sell Church properties, handle Church finances, help complete the temple, and move needy Saints west. He sent word back for Elders Young and Hyde to dedicate the temple if the Twelve were unable to return to do it. 26 He sent word, also, that the Twelve were petitioning God to “open the way” for “the upright” to leave Nauvoo and join them. “Seek diligently,” he said, to “follow after us.”

April. During the April conference at Nauvoo, Elder Hyde instructed that all should leave as soon as possible, and the congregation voted to do so. He counseled the needy to find work along the Iowa route west, for, said he, “there is plenty of work all along [the] road.” 27 When Elder Wilford Woodruff arrived in Nauvoo from his European mission in mid-April, he “found all the Saints struggling for life, as it were, to gather with the Saints in the wilderness.” News that Governor Ford would pull guard troops from Nauvoo on 1 May, leaving the Saints unprotected, caused “considerable excitement.” 28 That report triggered a mass departure, the first of three large-scale evacuations that spring. Dangers caused Elders Hyde, Woodruff, Joseph Young, and others to privately dedicate the temple on 30 April. 29 Meanwhile, President Young sent word to sell the temple and use sale proceeds to move the poor and pay the temple construction crew. 30

May. On 1 May the temple was dedicated publicly by Elder Hyde. In all, nearly 6,000 Latter-day Saints had received their temple ordinances in Nauvoo the previous winter. President Brigham Young in later months would draw upon these temple experiences to help motivate the Saints during trying times. “Let the fire of the covenant which you made in the House of the Lord burn in your hearts,” he counseled. 31

After the dedication, a second wave of Saints departed. On 14 May Governor Ford reported that 50 teams and 1,350 souls had left Nauvoo that week. 32 Among them were Elders Woodruff and Hyde.

A week later, the Bloomington Herald noted that ferries crossed 35 times in 24 hours at Nauvoo, 35 times upriver at Fort Madison, Iowa, and several times downriver at Nashville, Iowa. From the town of Montrose to the Des Moines River, teams numbered about 1,400, with perhaps 7,000 to 8,000 persons, and the Herald reported, “The slopes of the hills and the prairie opposite Nauvoo, are still dotted with clusters of tents and wagons.”

June. Early in June, an anti-Mormon delegation marched into Nauvoo, producing such “great excitement,” Thomas Bullock said, that “many of the brethren packed up and crossed the river.” On 9 June Saints were “rushing to the ferry in order to cross the river” because, Lucius Scovil said, “the mob began to rage and threaten the Saints,” whipping some, shooting at others, and swearing at LDS herd boys. For the “panic struck” people, Bullock wrote on the 11th, the regular and extra ferries were not “half enough” for the job. The mob gave the Saints a week to vacate Nauvoo, time enough for them and non-LDS newcomers to organize a 700-man army that scared off the would-be attackers while Nauvoo continued to empty. “Hundreds, I might say thousands, of houses [are] empty where once happy Saints dwelt, sung, and prayed,” Bullock said on 27 June. “Fences nearly all down, gardens laid waste, fruit trees destroyed by cattle.” 33

Companies and Outfits. No superior captains directed the three waves of spring departures; each wagon cluster was on its own. John Woolley put it this way: “As soon as a few families got ready, they would start.” 34 Few companies had more than 30 wagons. Most contained a dozen or less, belonging to relatives or friends. Among identified companies are those of Isaac Haight (13 families), Solomon Hancock (18 teams), the Tracy group (10 families), Saints from the town of Macedonia (32 wagons), Levi Hancock (2 wagons), Elder Woodruff (3 wagons and a carriage), the Woolley family (4 wagons, 1 carriage), the Knights and DeMilles (14 people, 3 wagons), the Scovil group (19 people, 3 wagons), the Phineas Richards group (20 people, 5 wagons), and a Canadian group (10 wagons).

A typical outfit was a fully loaded covered wagon pulled by two yoke of oxen; Saints replaced their horses with oxen as soon as they could. James S. Brown, while observing Latter-day Saint covered wagons “as far as the eye could reach” about 10 May, noted that “the teams were made up of oxen, milch cows, two-year-old steers and heifers, and very few horses and mules.” Drivers of the teams, he said, “were of both sexes, and comprised young and old.” Wagons had few passengers, and he said, “The people who could walk did so, and many were engaged in driving loose stock.” 35 Livestock control was a daily challenge. Elder Woodruff’s first day on the road was a disaster, his diary states, because he had no one to help him manage 25 head of livestock. “As soon as we started,” he said, “the calves and cows all [ran] various ways.” Elsewhere, spirited young woman Louisa Barnes Pratt “found great pleasure in riding horseback” and rendered “some assistance in driving the stock.” 36

Spring Routes and Trail Life. Spring grasses (cattle feed) let spring exodus Saints take routes more directly west than the Camp of Israel’s track that hugged Missouri. More Saints followed the alternate routes than the so-called main Mormon Trail. Spring travelers crossed the Des Moines River at Bonaparte but also upriver at Iowaville, Eddyville, and near present-day Des Moines. They traveled on existing roads, which were in poor shape and muddy when it rained. Spring trail traffic was heavy, and sometimes, Newel Knight noted, the prairies were “spotted with wagons, cattle, horses and sheep, men, women and children.”

Some travelers, like Reddick Allred, enjoyed “good roads and plenty of grass.” 37 Most, however, faced problems relating to poor road conditions, rain, mud, heat, wagon breakdowns, accidents, livestock, illnesses, or deaths. “The weather was extremely warm,” John Mills Woolley recalled; “therefore, we were obliged to travel very slow.” 38 Accidents injured oxen and people and damaged wagons. On 27 May, Elder Woodruff’s father fell while getting into a moving wagon, and the heavily loaded wagon ran over his arms and legs, bruising him but not breaking any bones.

To keep up their spirits through the trek, members sang and met in social gatherings. “There was much singing, mostly of sacred hymns or sentimental songs,” James S. Brown recalled, “and from no quarter could coarse songs be heard.” Sometimes the camp “would meet in a sociable dance in the evenings, to drive dull care away,” he explained. 39 Early in June the women in Louisa Barnes Pratt’s company decided to organize themselves. They voted that when men call for prayers and then get sidetracked in conversation, “that the sisters retire to some convenient place, pray by themselves and go about their business.” Louisa said that “in the midst of our amusements we did not forget our prayers. We have large campfires around which we gather, sing songs, both spiritual and comic, then all unite in prayer.” 40

Apparently the small companies did not hold formal Sunday church meetings during their trek. Saints enjoyed visiting with those they passed or who passed them, going either direction. Teenager George W. Bean, sent on foot from Mount Pisgah back to Nauvoo, “met about nine hundred wagons moving west and had a good time on the trip, answered hundreds of questions and ate five or six times a day, always meeting friends in every company.” 41

Separations. While trying to move their families west, several LDS men (Lucius Scovil, Franklin D. Richards, Samuel W. Richards, and others) were called on missions, most to England, to proselyte and provide leadership. 42 To leave and let their families head west without them was a severe trial of faith—“a painful duty,” Scovil called it. “I was determined to fill my mission if it cost me all that I had on the earth, relying on words of Jesus for he says that he that is not willing to forsake all for my sake is not worthy of me, your houses, lands, fathers, mothers, wife, and children.” When Scovil left them on the trail, he said he “could not keep from bursting into a flood of tears.” 43

Births, Deaths, and Health. Spring refugees recorded births along the way. For example, babies were born to Jane Snyder Richards, Mrs. John H. Tippets, Jane Roberts (during a downpour that “brought water around the wagons up to our boot-tops”), Elizabeth Breeding Hendrickson, Mrs. Ethan Barrows, and undoubtedly many others. 44

Spring and summer sicknesses, especially malaria, made widespread by puddled water and mosquitoes, caused sickness and some deaths. Measles struck the Canadian Company. 45 All of Clarissa Wilhelm’s children had whooping cough and “not one of them could sit up in the wagon.” 46 The Driggs family cluster left Nauvoo late in May, and aging father Urial Driggs died soon after. 47

Anson Call buried a six-month-old son on 15 June. 48 George Bryant Gardner told how his company camped near the Fox River, “the whole of us sick and unable to help ourselves.” A local man named Miller cared for them, lodging them in his smokehouse, but Brother Hill and one child died, and Gardner “was so sick that I couldn’t get out of bed but layed there with the dead men.” 49 Forty-five-year-old Nathaniel Ashby, unused to the “rough work” of handling three wagons and six yoke of oxen, became ill and died at Bonaparte. 50 During the Iowa crossing, the John Lowry Jr. family lost a four-year-old daughter, Elizabeth, and five-month-old son William. 51 Big Hyrum Spencer wore himself out while herding 100 head of cattle on the trail, died, and was buried at Mount Pisgah. 52

Scores of Saints stopped temporarily along the way in order to work. They left Mormon imprints across a wide north-south span of southeastern Iowa that local residents today are aware of—place-names, grave sites, cabin sites, trail ruts, and buildings built by Latter-day Saint workmen.

Overtaking the Camp of Israel. Several Camp of Israel diarists noted when the spring exodus Saints caught up with them. Perhaps a bit enviously, Patty Sessions wrote the following on 15 May, when a few miles beyond Garden Grove: “Some from Nauvoo overtook us. They have been on the road but three weeks. We three months.” Early in July President Young counted 1,805 wagons between his Missouri River camp and Mount Pisgah—1,300 more wagons than his Camp of Israel started with—and hundreds more were still east of Mount Pisgah. 53 By the end of July most of the spring exodus groups had caught up with President Young’s company and merged with it beside the Missouri River.

In July the Saints’ activities along the bluffs, as seen from the Missouri River, presented quite a sight to non-LDS visitor Thomas L. Kane: “[The bottomlands] were crowded with covered carts and wagons; and each one of the Council Bluff hills opposite was crowned with its own great camp, gay with bright white canvas, and alive with the busy stir of swarming occupants. In the clear blue morning air, the smoke streamed up from more than a thousand cooking fires. Countless roads and bypaths checkered all manner of geometric figures on the hillsides. Herd boys were dozing upon the slopes; sheep and horses, cows and oxen, were feeding around them, and other herds in the luxuriant meadow of the then swollen river. From a single point I counted four thousand head of cattle in view at one time. As I approached the camps, it seemed to me the children there were to prove still more numerous.” 54

Act 3: The Fall Exodus

During the summer months of 1846, small numbers of Saints continued to leave Nauvoo sporadically. By September only 700 to 1,000 Saints who wanted to go west were still in the city, some being new arrivals. Many lacked wagons and teams. Some were too ill to travel. In the fall exodus crowds were Mary Fielding Smith, clerk Thomas Bullock, temple architect Truman O. Angell, and Joseph Knight.

On 13 September armed anti-Mormons attacked these Nauvoo defenders and won what is called the Battle of Nauvoo. The Saints signed a formal surrender of the city three days later, whereupon victors drove them out at gunpoint. LDS refugees swarmed across the river to Montrose, and many camped a mile north at Potter’s Slough, on the river’s shore. Most were destitute and sickly.

During the next weeks, this mass of beleaguered refugees gradually dissipated—they moved into nearby Iowa settlements, downriver to St. Louis, into nearby states, westward by their own means, or in time westward in two rescue wagon trains sent from the main camps.

Scores found temporary work and lodging in eastern Iowa. Jonathan Crosby borrowed oxen for his teamless wagon, moved to Bonaparte, worked to earn two yoke of oxen, and headed west the next spring. 55 Wendle Mace, a temple workman, moved his sick wife into a house in Keosauqua, worked as a mechanic for the flour mill, built several sawmills and gristmills in the area, and headed west in 1848. 56 Albert and Tamma Durfee Miner left the poor camps and lived in Iowaville for two seasons; after Albert died there in 1848, Tamma took her children west. The Prophet Joseph Smith’s uncle Asael Smith and family also stayed in Iowaville. Both he and his wife, Elizabeth, died and are buried there. 57

Some Saints found refuge downriver from Nauvoo. John Ellison, ill with fever, took his wife, Alice, and two small children nine miles east of Nauvoo to John’s father’s home. In November, John and Alice went to St. Louis and stayed until 1851, when they headed west. 58 Edwin Rushton, his wife, and ill mother went to St. Louis, where the mother died on 20 September. 59

Many, like the Stillman Pond family, crossed Iowa on their own. Along the way the Ponds suffered from malaria, buried four children, including a baby born during the trek. Stillman was so sick he had to drive the wagon by lying on his stomach, peering through a knothole in the front board, and holding reins with one hand over the board. The Pond survivors reached Winter Quarters, Nebraska, on 16 October. 60 The Martin Bushman family crossed Iowa in company with several other families. Nearly all the Bushmans became ill en route. Their daughter Elizabeth, 9, died on 12 October. A week later their baby, not yet a year old, died. Near the Missouri River, they settled in the Latter-day Saint hamlet called Highland Grove. 61 In another wagon group, Scotsman Richard Ballantyne, 29, handsome and single, met Huldah Meriah Clark, 21. They fell in love and, soon after reaching the Missouri River, married at Winter Quarters, Nebraska, in February. 62

Hyrum Smith’s widow, Mary Fielding Smith, left about the time of the Battle of Nauvoo. Her daughter Martha Ann, age 5, recalled, “We bid goodbye to our dear old feeble grandmother [Lucy Mack Smith]. I can never forget the bitter tears she shed when she bid us goodbye.” Mary bought supplies and teams downriver in Keokuk, flour at Bonaparte, and then headed west. Her company had 9 wagons, 18 people, 21 loose cattle, and 43 sheep. They arrived at Winter Quarters on 21 October. 63

One mid-September count found between 600 and 700 Saints camped by Potter’s Slough. Many of these had moved out by the time Thomas Bullock counted only 17 tents and 8 wagons in camp on 4 October. “Most of those are the poorest of the Saints,” he said. “Not a tent or wagon but sickness in it.”

Meanwhile, in mid-September at Winter Quarters, Nebraska, the high council and Presiding Bishop Newel K. Whitney organized an 11-man rescue party under Captain Orville M. Allen. It left for Montrose on 14 September (one day after the Battle of Nauvoo, about which they knew nothing). 64 Then, on 25 September, news reached Winter Quarters about the attack (12 days after it was fought). “Rise up with [teams] and go straightway and bring a load of the poor from Nauvoo,” President Young urged the Saints. 65 In response, the high council across the river in present-day Council Bluffs, Iowa, sent back a rescue team early in October, led by James Murdock and Allen Taylor. 66

Captain Allen’s company of 20 rescue wagons reached the poor camps on 6 October. Bishop Whitney, in the area buying flour at Bonaparte for Winter Quarters, Nebraska, and for the poor camps, estimated 50 wagons could haul everybody in the poor camps, which means they numbered 400 or less. 67

On 9 October 1846, Saints camped by Potter’s Slough participated in the “Miracle of the Quail,” when large flocks of exhausted quail flopped into the camp, landing on and under wagons and in tents. “Every man, woman and child had quails to eat for their dinner,” Thomas Bullock wrote. 68

That same day, Nauvoo trustees Fullmer, Heywood, and Babbitt brought shoes, clothing, molasses, pork, and salt to the Saints, after which Captain Allen’s wagon train started their journey, comprising 151 men, women, and children—44 of whom were ill. Captain Allen had a list of specific people he was instructed to bring back, but he accepted a few who were not sent for. Scores were left behind to await the next rescue train, including the poorest of the poor. When the Allen train camped opposite Bonaparte, Bullock recorded, “the sisters had a regular washing day, and the men were ordered to fetch water for them.” More Saints joined the train, he said, so by the 22nd it had 28 wagons and 157 people.

Notable experiences of the Allen Company’s trek include Sarah Gubbett’s death caused by falling under a rolling wagon, men fighting a prairie fire that threatened a farm and fence and receiving pumpkins as rewards from the grateful farmer, Joan Campbell’s delivering a stillborn baby and then dying, and constant delays caused by cattle wandering off by morning. The group reached Mount Pisgah on 4 November, left some Saints there, including Joseph Knight (he died soon after), and halted by the Missouri River on 27 November. Captain Allen’s drawn-out trip from the poor camps took 50 days, 17 being no-travel days.

The Completed Evacuation

The fall exodus essentially emptied Nauvoo of Latter-day Saints who desired to go west. As noted earlier, Nauvoo and nearby areas held perhaps 15,000 Saints who could have joined the exodus, augmented by hundreds of newcomers. Where were they at year’s end? Based on incomplete data, the estimate is that by the winter of 1846-47 perhaps 5,000 exiled Saints were at Winter Quarters, Nebraska; 7,500 were in LDS camps across the river from Nebraska and elsewhere in Iowa and at Ponca Camp north of Winter Quarters; 69 and 1,500 were in St. Louis or other Mississippi River towns. At least 1,000 and possibly 2,000 or even more defected from the Twelve’s leadership and scattered from the Nauvoo area. A few members, including Emma, the Prophet Joseph Smith’s widow, and Lucy Mack Smith, his mother, later returned to and stayed in Nauvoo. 70

When the winter of 1846-47 enveloped Illinois, it found Nauvoo mostly a vast, tragic ghost city. Its former inhabitants and other Saints from nearby had become homeless and exposed refugees, most of whom were now encamped in precarious circumstances. Yet they, full of faith, like modern children of Israel sojourning in the wilderness, had tried to reach a new promised land in the American West during 1846 but only made it one-fourth the way. When spring came again, in 1847, they would try again.

 

History of 1847-1850

May 20, 2004

 

Ensign articles August, 1992, Emma Hale

Ensign July 1997, Gathering the Dispersed Nauvoo Saints, William Hartley

Gathering the Dispersed Nauvoo Saints, 1847–1852

By William G. Hartley

The widely scattered Nauvoo Saints made their way progressively toward the Salt Lake Valley, following President Brigham Young, who on 24 July 1847 identified the valley as the long-foreseen “right place.”

William G. Hartley, “Gathering the Dispersed Nauvoo Saints, 1847–1852,” Ensign, July 1997, 12
Theirs was a Nauvoo exodus wedding. Emily Abbott and Edward Bunker became bride and groom on 19 February 1846, with Elder John Taylor of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles officiating. A few weeks after the wedding, Elder Taylor crossed the Mississippi River to join the winter exodus of about 3,000 Latter-day Saints from Nauvoo, Illinois. Emily and Edward left in May during the larger spring exodus of about 10,000 Latter-day Saints, stopping midway across Iowa at Garden Grove. There, they and another newlywed couple bought a log cabin “minus doors, floor or window.” 1 In June, Edward hiked west 140 miles, where he was one of the last 16 recruits to enlist in the Mormon Battalion.

During the winter of 1846–47, Emily was expecting a baby in Garden Grove while husband Edward was marching across Arizona with the Mormon Battalion. (For ease of reading, the names of present-day U.S. states are included.) The Church, like the Bunkers, was widely dispersed. The Saints had been forced from Nauvoo and scattered like the pieces of a broken china plate.

Scattered Saints

By the time spring 1847 arrived, the 14,000 members who had fled the Nauvoo area were located in numerous groups across the western United States. The main group was encamped along the Missouri River at Winter Quarters, Nebraska. (In addition, two groups of Saints were waiting to “gather to Zion” as soon as the Church identified its new home: more than 10,000 converts in the British Isles and some 238 Saints in northern California who had traveled from New England on the ship Brooklyn.)

As the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles observed, “At no period since the organization of the Church on the 6th of April, 1830, have the Saints been so extensively scattered.” 2 The goal of the Twelve was to locate the isolated, large, productive place where the Church was to be reassembled. They faced four urgent tasks: (1) send an advance, exploratory pioneer group west to find a route and the settlement site; (2) subsequently send large pioneer companies to establish a settlement at the site; (3) have the Saints who were waiting to go west develop good temporary farms and homes; and (4) gather the widespread groups of Saints.

Two Groups Arrive in California

Surprisingly, during 1846 and early 1847 two Latter-day Saint groups arrived in California months before President Young left Winter Quarters for the Rockies: the Brooklyn Saints and the Mormon Battalion.

Saints on the Brooklyn. Wind-puffed white sails instead of dusty white wagon covers helped one group of Saints go west by sailing around South America’s Cape Horn and up to California. On 4 February 1846—the same day Charles Shumway ferried across the Mississippi River from Nauvoo, starting the Church’s exodus west—the ship Brooklyn sailed from New York harbor. On 31 July 1846, these Saints, led by Sam Brannon, reached Yerba Buena (present-day San Francisco), a village of about 150 residents. Though many stayed in California, in time about one-third migrated to the intermountain area and rejoined the main body of the Church. 3 (See “Voyage of the Brooklyn,Ensign, July 1997, p. 16.)

The Mormon Battalion. Having nearly 500 men enlist in the Mormon Battalion in July 1846 for one year of Mexican War duty was both a blessing and a hardship for the Church. Much of the battalion’s early pay and uniform allowances went to the Church’s general funds and helped the Saints in and near Winter Quarters. But the loss of 500 strong men left many families in precarious circumstances, hindering the trek westward. President Young gave the departing battalion a prophetic promise, however. He said that “on condition of faithfulness” they would be spared from battle, their expedition would result in great good, and their names would “be handed down in honorable remembrance to all generations.” 4 About 80 women, children, and youths accompanied the battalion, working as laundresses and military aides. 5

The battalion’s trek across the western United States would be one of history’s longest infantry marches. The Mormon Battalion first marched from Council Bluffs, Iowa, to Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. They then followed the traders’ well-worn trail to Santa Fe, New Mexico. There, Colonel Philip St. George Cooke assumed command. Cooke’s orders from General Stephen W. Kearny, commander of the Army of the West, were to march the battalion to the Pacific Ocean, making a wagon road in the process. In places they had “pioneered a new route through previously unexplored deserts between mountainous Apache strongholds on the north and the Mexican frontier settlements on the south. This route would become a key link in a proposal for a southern transcontinental railroad. This in turn would make the 1853 Gadsden Purchase necessary, bringing what is now southern Arizona and New Mexico into the United States.” 6

Of the 496 men who left Fort Leavenworth, 335 reached California. Most of those who did not make it to California had become physically unable to continue marching and had been sent in sick detachments, along with most of the women, children, and youths, to winter at Pueblo, Colorado. When the battalion reached southern California in January 1847, they learned that the war was over and that California belonged to the United States.

Assigned to garrison duties in San Diego, San Luis Rey Mission, and Los Angeles, most of the battalion men counted the days until their enlistment expired in July 1847. In San Diego, Company B men spent off-duty hours working at their trades, including brickmaking. Within two months, they built two brickyards, a kiln, courthouse, and chimneys; dug several wells; and performed carpenter, blacksmith, and leather work, “which won the friendship of many residents of San Diego.” 7

When release day came in July 1847, 79 soldiers accepted army pleas to reenlist, but 239 went north to San Francisco, determined to cross the Sierra Nevada and head eastward to find their families. 8 When word came from President Young suggesting they consider staying to earn money in California, 56 took jobs near Sutter’s Fort; some of them were among the first to discover the gold that launched the California Gold Rush; others worked elsewhere. About 70 battalion veterans went eastward in 1847. Private Edward Bunker and 31 others, for example, reached and then left the Salt Lake Valley in mid-October 1847 and, despite deep snows, arrived at Winter Quarters, Nebraska, in mid-December “penniless and destitute” after being gone for 18 months.

“I found my wife [Emily] in quite poor circumstances,” Edward Bunker recalled, and he met his 11-month-old son. 9 By the early 1850s, most of the Mormon Battalion men had joined the Saints in the mountains of Utah.

As promised by President Young, the Mormon Battalion was spared from battle. However, 23 men, 2 women, and 3 children—all Latter-day Saints—and 1 non-LDS soldier died as a result of exposure, exhaustion, or illness.

The following chart shows the locations of the widely scattered Nauvoo Saints in early spring 1847.*

Approximate Numbers

Location

• 5,000 (main group)

Winter Quarters, Nebraska

• 5,000 (cluster groups)

Pottawattamie lands in Iowa, across the river from Winter Quarters

• 450 (three wagon companies)

Ponca Camp, Nebraska, 120 miles north of Winter Quarters

• 600 (temporary settlers)

Garden Grove, Iowa (a temporary LDS settlement and resting place)

• 700 (temporary settlers)

Mount Pisgah, Iowa (a temporary LDS settlement and resting place)

• 500 (individual families)

Scattered locations in eastern Iowa

• 200 (individual families)

Northern Missouri

• 1,500 (Nauvoo area exiles and new converts from the U.S. and Europe)

St. Louis, Missouri

• 335 (Mormon Battalion)

Southern California

• 300 (Mormon Battalion sick detachments, about 80 women and children with the battalion, and the Mississippi company of Saints)

Pueblo, Colorado


Trails of the Scattered Saints, 1846–47. (1) Main Body of Saints (Mormon Pioneer Trail), left Nauvoo on 4 February 1846. (2) Mississippi Company, left Marion County, Alabama, in March 1846 and Monroe County, Mississippi, in April. Spent winter of 1846–47 in Pueblo. (3) Mormon Battalion, left Winter quarters in July 1846. (4) Mormon Battalion Sick Detachments, spent winter of 1846–47 in Pueblo. (5) Saints on the Ship Brooklyn, left New York on 4 February 1846 and arrived at Yerba Buena on 31 July 1846.

Two Groups Arrive in Pueblo

Far southwest of Winter Quarters, Nebraska, two other Latter-day Saint groups ended up wintering in 1846–47 at today’s Pueblo, Colorado: the Mississippi company of Saints and the sick detachments of the Mormon Battalion.

While Nauvoo was being evacuated, leaders instructed members in the South to come northwesterly and to join them somewhere on the Platte River. 10 In late March 1846, Alabamans under John Holladay and Mississippians under William Crosby formed a company of some 60 persons. Guided by 25-year-old John Brown, a Tennessean and former missionary to the South, they headed to Missouri, where they were joined by 16 other members, some connected to the southerners. The group, which came to be known as the Mississippi company of Saints, then set out on the Oregon Trail and arrived at Grand Island, Nebraska, unaware they were already 170 miles west of President Brigham Young and the growing settlement at Winter Quarters. Thinking President Young was west of them, they trekked onward to today’s Laramie, Wyoming, where they learned that the Saints had stopped to create Winter Quarters. 11

Needing a place to winter themselves, they accepted a mountain man’s invitation to accompany him 300 miles south to Pueblo, Colorado, arriving in early August. There as many as 15 mountain men and their Spanish or Native American wives and families headquartered. The southerners fixed up their own lodgings and prepared food for the winter. One traveler observed these Saints on 20 August and said: “After half an hour’s riding, we saw the white wagons of the Mormons drawn up among the trees. Axes were sounding, trees falling, and log-huts rising along the edge of the woods and upon the adjoining meadow. As we came up, the Mormons left their work, seated themselves on the timber around us, and began earnestly to discuss points of theology, complain of the ill-usage which they had received from the ‘Gentiles,’ and sound a lamentation over the loss of their great temple of Nauvoo.” 12

In September, John Brown and 6 others headed back to the South to get additional family members. On the way home they met the nearly 500-man Mormon Battalion, whose leaders had come to feel encumbered by the over 80 women and children accompanying the battalion and hampered by some seemingly unrecovering sick battalion soldiers. When battalion leaders learned that 275 miles west at Pueblo was headquartered the Mississippi company, the news was received joyfully. Within four days many of the women and children were sent to Pueblo with the first of three sick detachments of soldiers. Ultimately about 154 soldiers and nearly all of the women and children with the battalion joined the more than 70 wintering southerners to form a community of over 300 Latter-day Saints.

Surprisingly, this group in Pueblo was some 520 miles southwest of President Young and the Saints back at Winter Quarters. No one knows what would have been the sad outcomes for those with the Mormon Battalion had not the Mississippi company of Saints been so fortuitously located in Pueblo to receive, care for, and nurse their incoming brothers and sisters. During their fall-to-spring stay there, they built a church for worship and socials, and at least 9 deaths, at least 7 births, and 3 marriages occurred in this Colorado branch of the Church.

Next spring, an advance party of 17 from the Mississippi company went north in April and waited for two weeks at Fort Laramie before greeting President Young’s advance, exploratory company on 1 June 1847. The rest of the Mississippi company and those associated with the Mormon Battalion who had wintered at Pueblo soon moved north to Fort Laramie and reached the Great Salt Lake Valley five days after President Young. 13 These pieces of the scattered Church became part of the whole again.

The 1847 Advance, Exploratory Company

Fervent prayer started President Young’s 1847 advance, exploratory trek from Winter Quarters to the Salt Lake Valley. Norton Jacob wrote of the events of 16 April: “After being numbered and formed into two lines in a circle … all kneeled down, when Brother Brigham addressed the Lord by prayer and dedicated the mission and all we have to the Lord God of Israel.” 14 Their fundamental mission was to precisely locate the site that had been revealed to President Young in a vision—a site in the Great Basin “in the top of the mountains” (see Isa. 2:2).

This advance, exploratory group led by President Young was not a typical Latter-day Saint train with tight food supplies and families planning to be settlers. 15 Rather, this was a handpicked scouting group of 143 men, 3 women, and 2 children. Eight of the Twelve Apostles were in the group. To speed their journey, the company would use more horses and mules than oxen, differing from later companies heading west.

In accord with a 14 January 1847 revelation (see D&C 136), President Young organized the Saints carefully into companies of 100, 50, and 10 (meaning people in this case, not wagons). He served as company president and main captain, aided by 2 captains of 100, 5 captains of 50, and 14 captains of 10. Their story is one of “organization, foresight, and discipline,” wrote one historian, saying that they stopped more days for Sabbath worship than for delays caused by travel hazards. 16

For half their journey, this advance, exploratory company followed the north side of the Platte River. 17 Later travelers joked that the lazy Platte was “a mile wide and an inch deep, too thin to plow, too thick to drink.” As much as possible, they followed somewhat established trails, smoothing and improving the way for following pioneer companies and only occasionally blazing new trail segments.

During this trek, men were assigned as hunters and fishermen. Blacksmiths were essential, constantly fixing wagons and wheels and shoeing horses. It was later written: “As soon as camp was formed, Brother [Alfred] Lambson’s forge would be prepared and the ringing of the anvil was heard until night fall.” 18

On 18 April, a clerks’ inventory tallied 72 wagons, 66 oxen, 89 horses, 52 mules, 19 cows, and 17 dogs. The wagons carried stockpiles of flour, sea biscuits, dried beans, bacon, dried beef, salted codfish, and salt. Cows provided milk. Wagons contained tents, saddles, iron for horseshoes, nails, leather for harness repairs and for boots and shoes, tools, cooking and eating utensils, sacks of garden seeds and buckwheat, and bags of corn, oats, and bran to feed the livestock.

By late April, the wagons left behind Nebraska prairie lands and entered the high, dry Great Plains, where short, curled “buffalo grass” grew and where, in the coming month’s heat, travelers’ lips chapped and wood wagons and boxes shrank and cracked. Streams and firewood became scarce. Being in buffalo country, “we picked up some dry buffalo dung, which made a very good fire,” wrote Howard Egan. 19 Another group member wrote that he “could stand on [his] wagon and see more than ten thousand buffalo.” 20 During May, hunters brought in badly needed buffalo meat, which William Clayton described as “very sweet and as tender as veal.” 21 What meat they didn’t eat, they dried around campfires and tucked into their wagons. Fearing Indian attacks, on 4 May the captains ordered that wagons roll four abreast that day. During travels on 6 May, scouts rode back and stopped them “in consequence of the prairie being on fire ahead.” 22 The next day, Howard Egan wrote, “Last night the Lord sent a light shower, which put the fire out and made it perfectly safe to travel.” 23

In western Nebraska, each group of 10 took turns leading the company “so as to divide the chore of breaking the road.” 24 President Young and Elder Heber C. Kimball of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles often rode ahead “to look out the route.” In mid-May, William Clayton, trying to tally the miles traveled by counting rotations of a wagon wheel, wanted an odometer—a gear device with graduated cogs. Other wagon trains had used them. He promoted the idea, science-oriented Elder Orson Pratt helped design it, and mechanic Appleton Harmon constructed it from a feed box and scraps of iron. Clayton attached the odometer to a wagon axle. 25 Using odometer readings, explorer John Fremont’s maps, and his own daily observations, Clayton published a trail guide a year later that proved useful to subsequent Latter-day Saints and others heading west. 26

In late May, the pioneers pushed past impressive rock formations in western Nebraska. Carved by wind and rain, the formations looked like buildings, earning them names like Courthouse Rock, Jail Rock, Chimney Rock, and Scotts Bluff. On 29 May, while they were camped at the Nebraska-Wyoming border, President Young called a meeting and chastised some of the men for too much evening dancing and card playing, quarreling, crudeness, levity, loud laughter, yelling, put-downs, profanity, and unholy attitudes. There was not enough prayer and good reading. His repentance call produced markedly improved camp behavior. In fact, taken as a whole, these men were decent, orderly, unselfish, and loyal to each other.

On 31 May, a “good hard road” brought the advance, exploratory company, now in mountain country, to their first timber and firewood in three weeks. By then they were averaging 12 miles per travel day. On 1 June, President Young’s 46th birthday, the travelers camped near Fort Laramie. There, four events broke their normal routines. First, at the fort they gained information about the trail ahead and acquired some supplies. Second, they met 17 members from the Mississippi company of Saints who had wintered at Pueblo and then had come to Fort Laramie two weeks before President Young, where they then joined President Young’s company. 27 Third, word came that 600 to 700 wagons of non-Latter-day Saints were westbound from St. Joseph, Missouri, headed for coastal Oregon and California, and would soon catch up with the Latter-day Saints, who preferred to travel alone. 28 Fourth, starting on 3 June, the advance, exploratory company crossed over the Platte River to join the Oregon Trail.

Near Casper, Wyoming, the advance company spent four laborious days recrossing the Platte River, which was unusually swift at this time. Carpenters built a ferry boat by connecting two canoes with planks. It was capable of carrying one wagon. President Young assigned 10 men to stay behind to operate the ferry and earn money for the Church from the oncoming Oregon Trail travelers.

Leaving the Platte, the company marched overland to reach their next lifeline of water, the Sweetwater River. During June’s final week, the company followed the Oregon Trail along the Sweetwater. Often the road was sandy, the landscape barren. Hunters found antelope but no buffalo. Pioneers interacted with Oregon-bound companies, each group sometimes helping the other with repairs or blacksmithing. One day the advance company covered 18 miles; another, 25. On 27 June they rumbled over the Continental Divide at South Pass, a gentle saddle 7,550 feet above sea level. They camped at Pacific Springs on the west side of the pass.

On 28 June, the advance company reached the important fork in the road where the California Trail and the Oregon Trail divide near Green River in Wyoming. The Saints veered left toward California. That evening, by the Little Sandy River, they met legendary mountain man Jim Bridger, the first known white man to see the Great Salt Lake. He expressed doubt that corn could grow in the Great Salt Lake Valley because of the early frosts. Two days later, on 30 June, Sam Brannan, leader of the Brooklyn Saints at San Francisco, arrived. Among other things, he tried to convince President Young to bring the Saints to coastal California.

Over the next few weeks, many of the advance company became sick from an unknown illness, suffering pain in the head, back, joints, and bones; hot flashes; chills; and sometimes delirium. 29 For them, riding in jolting wagons was torture. 30

On Sunday, 4 July, a dozen Mormon Battalion soldiers from Pueblo caught up with the advance, exploratory company. 31 Another 140 battalion members, they said, were eight days behind them with the rest of the Mississippi Saints. On 7 July, the pioneers crossed a brook-ribboned, grassy valley floor, and stopped at Fort Bridger—then only two long log houses and a horse pen, with several Native American lodges nearby. Howard Egan traded two rifles for 19 buckskins and 3 elk skins “for making moccasins,” indicating that the company’s boots were wearing out. 32

Leaving the California Trail, President Young directed the group southwest along a crude, hardly used trail that headed more directly toward the Great Salt Lake Valley, the site President Young wanted to reach. On 10 July they crossed the Bear River Divide, 7,700 feet high, the highest point on the Mormon Trail. At the present Utah-Wyoming border, the advance company camped by an impressive formation of jutting, tapioca-textured rocks called by some the Needles.

Advance Company Splits into Three Groups

On 12 July, because so many were ill, President Young asked Elder Orson Pratt to take a vanguard party of 25 wagons and 42 healthy men to “hunt out the road.” Their job was to clear the trail of thick willows, rocks, and brush for the coming wagons.

On 14 July, Elders Heber C. Kimball and Ezra T. Benson of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles, together with Lorenzo Dow Young and Howard Egan, hiked up “on the top of a high mountain” and “offered … prayers to the Almighty God in behalf of the sick and for our dear families.” 33 But by 19 July, President Young, pale and emaciated with fever, could not go on, so 8 to 10 wagons stayed behind with him. The rest moved ahead. Thus the advance company was divided into three groups: Elder Pratt’s vanguard group, the main group, and the rear guard with President Young and other ill Saints.

On 19 July, Elder Pratt and John Brown of the vanguard group climbed a mountain near East Canyon and became the first Latter-day Saints to get a glimpse of a portion of the Great Salt Lake Valley. The next day, the group cleared the way over Big Mountain and Little Mountain. On 21 July, they found the year-old Donner Party trail, which “passed over an exceedingly steep and dangerous hill.” Elder Pratt wrote of the sight, “Mr. [Erastus] Snow and myself ascended this hill, from the top of which [we saw] a broad open valley. … At the north end of which the broad waters of the Great Salt Lake glistened in the sunbeams. … We could not refrain from a shout of joy which almost involuntarily escaped from our lips.” 34

Continuing on, Elder Pratt and Erastus Snow entered the Great Salt Lake Valley and explored it for the day. By the evening of the next day, Thursday, 22 July, both the vanguard group and the main company were camped on Parley’s Creek at present-day 1700 South and 500 East in Salt Lake City. 35 On the morning of Friday, 23 July, they traveled to a site between present-day Main and State Streets and 300 and 400 South, where they dedicated and consecrated the land to the Lord and began plowing at noon.

That same day, the rear guard was still in the mountains. Elder Woodruff, with President Young lying on a makeshift bed in Elder Woodruff’s carriage, reached the summit of Big Mountain. There they could see, for the first time, a small part of the Salt Lake Valley, the southwestern portion. Of that occasion, 15 years later, President Young said, “I directed Brother Woodruff to turn the carriage half way round so that I could have a look at a portion of the Salt Lake Valley. The Spirit of light rested upon me, and hovered over the valley, and I felt that there the Saints would find protection and safety; and that darkness which had rested over every place where we had been in the States vanished altogether.” 36 The rear guard of sick Saints camped that night at Little Mountain.

President Young Enters the Valley

The next day, Saturday, 24 July, the rear guard traveled the remaining six miles through Emigration Canyon. Elder Woodruff and President Young came into an extensive view of the valley. In his diary of that day Elder Woodruff wrote:

“This is an important day in the history of my life and the history of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. On this important day after trav[eling] from our encampment … we came in full view of the great valley or basin [of] the Salt Lake and land of promise held in reserve by the hand of God for a resting place for the Saints upon which a portion of the Zion of God will be built.

“We gazed with wonder and admiration upon the vast rich fertile valley. … Our hearts were surely made glad after a hard journey from Winter Quarters of 1,200 miles. …

“Thoughts of pleasing meditations ran in rapid succession through our minds while we contemplated that not many years that the house of God would stand upon the top of the mountains while the valleys would be converted into orchard, vineyard, gard[ens] and fields by the inhabitants of Zion and the standard would be unfurled for the nations to gather there to.

“President Young expressed his full satisfaction in the appearance of the valley as a resting place for the Saints and was amply repayed for his journey.” 37

Elder Woodruff later said of that moment on the 24th, President Young “was enwrapped in vision for several minutes. He had seen the valley before in vision, and upon this occasion he saw the future glory of Zion and of Israel, as they would be, planted in the valleys of these mountains. When the vision had passed, he said: ‘It is enough. This is the right place. Drive on.’ ” 38 President Young had reached the appointed gathering place for the scattered Saints.

At about noon on Saturday, 24 July 1847, President Young and the rear guard joined the pioneer encampment near Main Street and 300 South. This location marked the end of the 1,300-mile Mormon Trail. For the next 22 years this general trail served as a major highway on which some 70,000 Latter-day Saints came to Utah, until the transcontinental railroad replaced it in 1869.

Encamped on the open valley floor, these travel-weary Latter-day Saints enjoyed a Sabbath day’s rest. Then, Monday morning, they continued plowing large fields and garden plots, again diverting creek water onto the hard soil to soften it, just as the men the previous Friday and Saturday had done. They planted buckwheat, corn, oats, turnips, peach trees, apple trees, cabbage, and potatoes. On Wednesday, 28 July, President Young and other members of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles appointed the site for a temple—in the fork where the creek (City Creek) branched. This action of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles was the crowning step of their journey, putting in motion all that was needed to build again a house of the Lord as they had in Nauvoo.

The bulk of the battalion soldiers and Mississippi company from Pueblo arrived in the valley on 29 July. Counting them, President Young reported, “We number about 450 souls.” 39 Regarding these battalion men, Private John Steele made this observation: “Our men … now looked like mountaineers, sunburned and weather beaten, mostly dressed in buckskin with fringes and porcupine quills, moccasins, Spanish saddles and spurs, Spanish bridles and jinglers on them; and long beards. … Receiving a hearty welcome and a ‘God bless you,’ from the Lord’s ministers, was worth all we suffered.” 40

Surveyors soon laid out the city, divided it into 135 ten-acre blocks containing eight house lots, and designed a grid of wide streets and three public squares. In August the Salt Lake pioneers cut logs and poles in the canyons, constructed brush-roofed boweries for shade, and built small houses of logs or adobe. To covenant anew to build the kingdom, all were rebaptized in a pond behind a small dam in a creek. On 9 August, baby Young Elizabeth Steele (named after President Young) was the first birth in the settlement, and on 11 August, little Milton Therlkill from the Mississippi company drowned in a creek, the first death.

The Quorum of the Twelve Apostles had identified a route for the Saints to come west and located the place held in reserve for them. Now they would seek to anchor the settlement in the Great Salt Lake Valley with large pioneer companies coming from Winter Quarters. In fact, the big company of 1,500 Saints led by Elders Parley P. Pratt and John Taylor had already left in June 1847 and were on the trail. They would enter the Salt Lake Valley during September and October 1847.

Return Trek to Winter Quarters

In mid-August, nearly half of the pioneers in the Salt Lake Valley commenced their return to Winter Quarters, Nebraska, “nearly destitute of provision.” 41 The returnees left in groups, anxious to get their families and bring them back to the Salt Lake Valley. On 22 August, leaders held a conference to ratify some decisions. Those in attendance approved that workmen build a common fence around the farm area and that the settlement be named Great Salt Lake City of the Great Basin, North America, and named the valley river the Western Jordan. “Raise all you can” and “live in the stockade” were parting instructions. Elder Kimball urged settlers to “throw away selfishness for it is of hell.” On 25 August, Elder Wilford Woodruff recorded with some pride: “We have laid out a city two miles square, and built a fort of hewn timber drawn seven miles from the mountains, and of sun-dried bricks or adobes, surrounding ten acres of ground, forty rods of which are covered with block-houses, besides planting about ten acres of corn and vegetables. All this we have done in a single month.” 42

By 26 August 1847, all eight Apostles who were with the advance company, including President Young, left in a company bound for Winter Quarters, Nebraska. They were eager to report to the Saints that the long-prophesied site for latter-day Israel “in the top of the mountains” had been located and their new headquarters was already being built up.

By early September, the eastbound returning pioneers met and passed the westbound big company of 560 wagons.

Upon reaching Winter Quarters on 31 October 1847 the returnees found that the thousands of Saints camped on both sides of the Missouri River were meeting the task of establishing temporary homes and farms. “They have raised a crop equal to any we used to raise in Illinois,” President Young noted, mostly corn and garden produce. “The brethren in this region … have been much more healthy this summer and fall than ever in Nauvoo.” And he said of the Saints there that “all their exertions tend to their removal westward.” 43

Late in 1847, the Twelve Apostles felt to reconstitute the First Presidency, which quorum had been vacant since the death of the Prophet Joseph Smith. So the Twelve called a special conference, for which workmen soon rushed to complete a large log tabernacle on the east side of the Missouri River in Miller’s Hollow. The tabernacle was described as “commodious” and “the biggest log cabin in the world!” 44

In that tabernacle, on 27 December 1847, President Brigham Young and Elders Heber C. Kimball and Willard Richards were sustained as the Church’s First Presidency. This action again concentrated major administrative leadership in the hands of three Apostles instead of all of the Twelve, and it freed members of the Twelve Apostles for assignments away from headquarters.

The next spring, each member of the First Presidency led a large pioneer company from the Winter Quarters–Kanesville area to the Salt Lake Valley.

Meanwhile, the remaining Saints—who made up the majority of those living in Winter Quarters—moved east across the Missouri River to Kanesville, Iowa, leaving Winter Quarters, Nebraska, all but destitute of inhabitants.

High-Risk First Year

Knowing whether or not the Great Salt Lake Valley settlers could produce a reasonable first harvest in untested land was essential to the Church’s future. Until the summer of 1848, the pioneers would have to rely on food and equipment brought in their own wagons. “The ingenuity of every man was taxed to the utmost,” said John Steele. By September 1847, the great Salt Lake Valley settlers had built a block-square fort with adobe walls seven feet high, and everyone had built cabins within the walls and moved in. 45 Surprisingly, by then some of the July-planted corn was in tassel. 46

While President Young was gone, John Smith, the Prophet Joseph Smith’s uncle, served as the valley’s stake president, assisted by counselors and a high council. These men were the valley’s spiritual and civic leaders. Under their direction, workmen expanded further the size of the original fort a block north and south (the original fort became known as the “Old Fort”), built hundreds of log cabins, fenced their city to control livestock, and constructed roads and bridges. They plowed some 5,000 acres and planted 872 acres with winter wheat.

Mormon Battalion captain James Brown, who had ridden to California with Sam Brannan, returned, bringing government pay for battalion men who had wintered at Pueblo. Valley leaders then sent Captain Brown back again to California with some of these funds, where he purchased and brought back cows, mules, wheat, and seeds. “The population of our city is 1671,” valley leaders reported on 6 March; “the number of houses 423.” 47 That winter was surprisingly mild. But by mid-winter, hunger became a serious problem. “Many … are literally starving,” John Steele said as 1848 opened. 48 Leaders rationed provisions. “We had about half a pound of flour per day for each person,” Jesse N. Smith recalled, who was age 13 then. “I was exceedingly hungry, for months my desire for food was not satisfied.” 49 Residents ate crows, thistle tops, bark, and sego lily bulbs. 50 They gathered “wild onion and thistle roots,” which, A. J. Allen wrote, “were not pleasant, but hunger made them taste good.” 51

Cabin life in the fort was primitive. Mary Isabella Horne said the first log houses were small and lacked doors, windows, and floors. “The ground was full of snakes which used to crawl around our houses, but these were soon killed or frightened away,” Sister Horne recalled. “The timber was so full of bugs that it was years before they were entirely subdued. The mice also were very numerous, running over us by day and by night, and destroying considerable clothing.” 52

By next May 1848, the long-awaited farm and garden plants sprouted. “Barley, oats, rye, buckwheat, and other grains look [good],” Elder John Taylor reported to President Brigham Young on 22 May; “flax and especially peas, look very promising.” But by month’s end the desperately needed crops were suffering from frost, lack of water, trampling by cattle, and crickets that came “by the thousands of tons.” 53

Many of the settlers became discouraged. “The great cry is to California, and great fear that we shall not be able to support ourselves,” Steele noted. 54 When crickets began destroying their crops in early June, the Saints prayed vigorously for help. For two weeks the crickets voraciously ate garden crops and corn plants before seagulls arrived. 55 Gulls are native to the area but winter in California. John Steele recorded that gulls feasted on crickets during June for about three weeks. By July, gulls and summer heat had diminished the cricket menace, and new plants grew. 56

On 10 August, the Saints celebrated their first harvest with a thanksgiving feast. Leonard Harrington wrote on 24 October: “Our wheat turned off tolerably well, though the crickets injured it considerable as also our corn, beans, vines, etc. We have enough to subsist on till another harvest, and some corn to spare.” 57 The First Presidency, a year later, in 1849, assessed that “the experiment of last year is sufficient to prove that valuable crops may be raised in this valley.” 58

Kanesville, Iowa: Gathering and Outfitting Center

History often overlooks the majority of Saints who had wintered in Iowa Territory across the Missouri River from Winter Quarters, Nebraska, living on lands recently vacated by Pottawattamie Indians. “A great number of our people made encampments on the east side of the river,” Bathsheba Smith recalled; “the camp thus scattered spread over a large tract.” 59

In 1848, government officials ordered the Church to vacate the Native American lands west of the Missouri River where Winter Quarters stood. The Saints who could do so headed west, and the rest moved east across the river. Miller’s Hollow was renamed Kanesville, in honor of Thomas L. Kane, an army colonel who helped the Latter-day Saints. The Kanesville Stake serviced thousands of Church members living in about 90 Latter-day Saint settlements and hamlets.

Winter Quarters and its hundreds of log homes fell vacant. In the next years the cabins slowly disappeared, the logs becoming firewood or parts of distant buildings. In the Iowa settlements, the Saints found the soil productive. “On the Iowa side we raised wheat, Indian corn, buckwheat, potatoes, and other vegetables,” Bathsheba Smith recalled, stating that they also gathered nuts, plums, and berries. “By these supplies we were better furnished than we had been since leaving our homes.” 60

In April 1849 the First Presidency sent word from the Salt Lake Valley that Kanesville, Iowa, and the nearby Latter-day Saint enclaves were to have a linked, double role—a gathering area as well as an outfitting center: “The brethren in Pottawattamie [County], who cannot fit themselves out this season as we have suggested, will do well to continue where they are, striving for the same object the next year; and the Saints in the United States, Canada, Europe, Asia, and Africa will continue to gather on the Pottawattamie lands, and prepare for their future journey.” 61

Among those living on Pottawattamie lands and preparing to go west were Allen Russell and Jude Allen, who belonged to the North Pigeon Branch. In 1849 their situation was fairly typical of hundreds of Saints. They “took up a farm,” built a house, planted corn, potatoes, and garden seeds. They decided to stay put until they got enough to emigrate to Salt Lake because, as they said, “we had traveled nearly all the time since 1844, and had not much to make our families comfortable.” 62

However, Saints continually left the Kanesville area to head west as they could. Bathsheba Smith and her family moved on in 1849 among some 400 wagons. 63 When the 1849 emigrating season ended, “nearly 8,000 exiles remained on the ‘Pottawattamie lands.’ ” 64 Each spring, more Latter-day Saint wagon trains left Kanesville, Iowa. Approximate total LDS emigration figures, which also include converts from Europe and the United States who were not part of the Nauvoo exodus, show the trend: 1847, 1,700; 1848, 3,500; 1849, 2,500; 1850, 5,000; 1851, 5,000; and 1852, 10,000. 65

Kanesville developed into a rustic, sizable Latter-day Saint town, boasting the log tabernacle, stores and shops, a concert hall, and the Frontier Guardian newspaper, which Elder Orson Hyde, who was assigned to preside over the Saints there, published for the benefit of the Church. At the river’s edge were three ferries. During the California Gold Rush, the Saints there prospered from selling farm products and livestock and providing skilled labor to the hordes of forty-niners. “This is quite a town,” Amelia Hadley said on 5 May 1851. “The houses are mostly hewed log, 2 story and on the main street they have sided them up and they present quite a fine appearance.” 66

The Command to Gather

The great overarching tasks of Church leadership were to finish pulling in the Church’s scattered Saints and to establish a new western Zion. On 21 September 1851, the First Presidency issued a forceful statement to the Saints in western Iowa to gather immediately. They sent Elder Ezra T. Benson of the Twelve and Elder Jedediah M. Grant of the Seventy to oversee the migration. “We wish you to evacuate Pottawattamie [County] … and next fall be with us,” the First Presidency urged the Saints. “There is no more time for the Saints to hesitate,” they cautioned. “We have been calling to the Saints in Pottawattamie [County] ever since we left them to come away,” they reminded. “What are you waiting for? Have you any good excuses for not coming? No!” 67

In response, in 1852 most of the Saints pulled out of Kanesville, Iowa, and surrounding settlements. Kanesville was renamed Council Bluffs. Deeper in Iowa, most Saints vacated the LDS settlements of Garden Grove and Mount Pisgah, both established in 1846. Some 10,000 Latter-day Saints were on the trail west in 1852, twice as many as in any other year. However, record numbers of other American pioneers, about 60,000, thronged to California and Oregon that year also. Stretches of the trails were jammed with wagons, and many good campsites were clogged. 68

Some LDS branches moved as a group. Branch president Benjamin Gardner, for example, led 241 North Pigeon Branch members and 45 wagons west. In that group, Sister Eunice Allen had to choose between staying with her husband, who had become disaffected from the Church in 1841, and going west with her married children, including son Jude Allen. When she asked her husband one last time to come to Utah, he declined. Poignantly, “she turned and went into the house where she rolled up the few clothes she had, put her shawl around her shoulders and walked out to the wagons. She climbed into Jude’s wagon, never looking back.” 69

Inflows of former Nauvoo Saints to Utah from Iowa during 1852 essentially closed the major chapter of the Nauvoo exodus story and ended the wide-scale and long-term scattering. Most former Nauvoo area residents who felt loyalty to President Brigham Young and the Church in Utah had moved west by then. Within a six-year period, Church leadership had done a remarkable job of reassembling the vast majority of the fragmented and dispersed Church membership. They had met well the challenges that they had faced when forced to leave Nauvoo in early 1846.

Edward and Emily Bunker, like other members separated in 1846, were now among the reassembled Saints living in one of more than 100 settlements in Utah. The Great Salt Lake Valley location “in the top of the mountains” was the “right place” for the Church to survive, build another temple, gain strength, prosper, establish procedures to gather modern Israel, and bring up new generations who would truly take the restored gospel out into all the world, preparing a people who will in time ready themselves for yet other important fulfillments of prophecy.

Saints were spread all over the world when Brigham left Winter Quarters in 1847.

The main point of gathering was to the Salt Lake valley.  Some wanted to gather to California, Brigham was determined to gather to the valley.

Isaiah 52:7-8 – Orson Pratt interprets this scripture to mean the Saints in Salt Lake, this is the same scripture that King Noah’s priests challenged Abinadi about in the Book of Mormon.

(Isaiah 52:7-8.)

 

7 ¶ How beautiful upon the mountains are the feet of him that bringeth good tidings, that publisheth peace; that bringeth good tidings of good, that publisheth salvation; that saith unto Zion, Thy God reigneth!

 

8 Thy watchmen shall lift up the voice; with the voice together shall they sing: for they shall see eye to eye, when the LORD shall bring again Zion.

 

"How Beautiful upon the Mountains" (Isa. 52

 

Isaiah 52:1-2 contains a call to Zion:

 

Awake, awake; put on thy strength, O Zion;

 

put on thy beautiful garments, O Jerusalem, the holy city:

 

for henceforth there shall no more come into thee

 

the uncircumcised and the unclean.

 

Shake thyself from the dust;

 

arise, and sit down, O Jerusalem:

 

loose thyself from the bands of thy neck,

 

O captive daughter of Zion.

 

These verses are interpreted by modern revelation, which provides a solid foundation for a discussion of the rest of the chapter. In Doctrine and Covenants 113 some questions are posed to the Lord about these verses, which he answers:

 

Q: What is meant by the command in Isaiah, 52d chapter, 1st verse, which saith: Put on thy strength, O Zion— and what people had Isaiah reference to?

 

A: He had reference to those whom God should call in the last days, who should hold the power of priesthood to bring again Zion, and the redemption of Israel; and to put on her strength is to put on the authority of the priesthood, which she, Zion, has a right to by lineage; also to return to that power which she had lost (D&C 113:7-8).

 

Q: What are we to understand by Zion loosing herself from the bands of her neck; 2d verse?

 

A: We are to understand that the scattered remnants are exhorted to return to the Lord from whence they have fallen; which if they do, the promise of the Lord is that he will speak to them, or give them revelation. See the 6th, 7th, and 8th verses. The bands of her neck are the curses of God upon her, or the remnants of Israel in their scattered condition among the Gentiles (D&C 113:9-10).

 

"How beautiful upon the mountains are the feet of him that bringeth good tidings, that publisheth peace; that bringeth good tidings of good, that publisheth salvation" (Isa. 52:7). In Hebrew, "how beautiful" is mah na'wu. From this phrase the Prophet Joseph Smith derived the name Nauvoo, which he interpreted as "place of rest" or "beauty." fn The phrase "him that bringeth good tidings" (Hebrew, mebasser), is based on the Hebrew root bsr, meaning "announce" or "proclaim." This phrase occurs in Isaiah seven times (40:9, twice; 41:27; 52:7, twice; 60:6; 61:1) in key passages in which it means "proclaiming the tidings of salvation." Isaiah 40:9; 52:7; and 61:1 particularly refer to messengers proclaiming the coming of the Messiah and the message of salvation through the atonement that he brings. The Greek Septuagint translated this word with the verb euangelizomai, literally "to bring a good message" (root of the English word evangelize). The writers of the New Testament, presumably on account of the occurrence of this word in the Septuagint passages in Isaiah, used the same term throughout, referring to the "good tidings" of the coming of the Savior (Luke 1:19; 2:10). The noun form euangelion (Matt. 4:23; 24:14; 26:13; Mark 1:1, 14; 8:35; 13:10; etc.) was rendered in Latin as evangelium and was then translated into Anglo-Saxon as god-spell, meaning "good-news." This led to the modern English gospel. Hence the occurrence and meaning of the term gospel in the New Testament is based on these very important passages in Isaiah, which refer to the coming of the Messiah and the Atonement.

 

One of the priests of Noah asked Abinadi the meaning of Isaiah 52:7-10 Mosiah12:20-24). Abinadi did not answer the question immediately, but after his scathing rebuke of the priests for their wickedness, he taught them about the coming of the Savior as the Suffering Servant, reading them Isaiah 53 in its entirety. He interpreted chapter 53 that "God himself should come down among the children of men" (Mosiah 17:8)—the teaching for which Abinadi would be put to death. Finally he returned to the original question and gave a prophetic interpretation of Isaiah 52:7-10. He explained that those who follow Christ and the prophets are the seed of Christ, who as servants "are they [changing the singular "him" of Isa. 52:7 to a plural] who have published peace, who have brought good tidings of good, who have published salvation; and said unto Zion: Thy God reigneth" (Mosiah 15:14). Abinadi further explained that these servants are only doing what they have seen the Servant do: "And behold, I say unto you, this is not all. For O how beautiful upon the mountains are the feet of him that bringeth good tidings, that is the founder of peace, yea, even the Lord, who has redeemed his people; yea, him who has granted salvation unto his people" (Mosiah 15:18). Thus those who accept the gospel become the seed of Abraham and the seed of Christ, and their responsibility is to look to the "rock from whence they are hewn" and to do as Abraham and Christ have done—to proclaim the good tidings, to preach the gospel. fn

 

Jesus quoted several of the verses from Isaiah 52 in his address to the Nephites in 3 Nephi 20:36-46, but he quoted the verses in a significantly different order: 1-3, 7, 11-15, interpreting the events as relating to the latter days, the restoration and preaching of the gospel, and the Second Coming.

 

Some scholars read the passage in Isaiah 52:13-15 about the servant whose "visage" was to be "marred" together with Isaiah 53, referring to the same suffering servant. The Book of Mormon never places it in this context; rather, the resurrected Jesus appears to have read this passage as referring to a servant who was yet to come (3 Ne. 20:43-45). He explained the passage in the context of the latter days, referring to a future servant who will be marred but healed (3 Ne. 21:9-10). Some have seen this as a prophecy referring to the coming of the Savior himself, who has been marred but preserved through the resurrection. Others see it as a reference to Joseph Smith or some other latter-day servant. fn

 

 

(Kent P. Jackson, ed., Studies in Scripture, Vol. 4: 1 Kings to Malachi [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1993], 164.)

On the 1st Sunday Brigham teaches about keeping the Sabbath holy, don’t plant anything yet!  They gave the Hosanna Shout, “Save us, save us, save us, Amen, Amen, Amen.  They were entreating the Lord, not commanding him.

President Hinckley Ensign Nov, 1989, Ensign to the Nations

Ensign 1998, Walker “Brigham Young student of the Prophet”

Brigham Young:
Student of the Prophet

By Ronald W. Walker

Brigham Young rejoiced in his close association with the Prophet Joseph Smith. Through it, he knew the Lord had prepared him for challenges and responsibilities yet to come.

Ronald W. Walker, “Brigham Young: Student of the Prophet,” Ensign, Feb. 1998, 51
When he recalled the days he spent with the Prophet of the Restoration, Brigham Young could hardly restrain his enthusiasm. “I feel like shouting, hallelujah, all the time, when I think that I ever knew Joseph Smith, the Prophet,” he declared. 1 Indeed, President Young often spoke and wrote admiringly of his friend and teacher. His statements—recorded in sermons, letters, diaries, and in conversations transcribed by clerks—illuminate an important facet of his personal growth. They also tell the story of friendship and discipleship and how one Church leader prepared another for future responsibilities. For the Prophet Joseph Smith was undoubtedly an instrument of the Lord in helping to mold Brigham Young into a strong leader, a pillar of the Church.

In the 1820s, Joseph Smith and Brigham Young actually lived not far from each other in upstate New York; the Smith home in Manchester township was fewer than 15 miles from the Young home in Mendon. This general proximity meant that Brigham Young heard about the beginning of the Church and about Joseph Smith from neighbors. President Young later recalled that “I knew his course of life, and that of the people who believed his testimony.” 2 In fact, he remembered reading a short notice in a local newspaper that reported the young Prophet’s first encounter with the angel Moroni. 3 People spoke of “old Jo Smith,” though he was but a young man, and questioned his integrity. 4 Perhaps these unfounded criticisms explain Brigham Young’s lengthy study of Latter-day Saint teachings. “I weighed the matter for a year and a half. I looked at it on all sides,” he said. “I reasoned on month after month.” 5 He was finally baptized in April 1832. His decision to join the Church was not determined by “mathematical proof” or learned “scientific deductions.” Rather, he had been convinced “by the spirit of truth which entered into [his] heart,” he said. 6

Learning by Observation

A year after his baptism, Brigham Young traveled with Joseph Young, his brother, and Heber C. Kimball to Kirtland, Ohio, for his first meeting with the Prophet Joseph Smith. Brigham remembered his excitement. He wanted to learn. “When I first saw Joseph,” he later said, “I had but one prayer”; he hoped to “hear Joseph speak on doctrine, and see his mind reach out untramelled to grasp the deep things of God.” 7

“[I] received the sure testimony, by the Spirit of prophecy, that he was all that any man could believe him to be, as a true Prophet,” Brigham Young remembered. The Prophet greeted his visitors warmly and had them come to his home, where in the evening they worshiped. Brigham Young was asked to pray. As he did, his words were transformed, and he spoke in tongues under the influence of the Holy Ghost. It was the “pure Adamic language,” Joseph Smith told those who were present. 8

A second visit to Kirtland nine months later allowed the two men to become better acquainted, and Brigham recalled once more “enjoying the society of the Prophet.” 9

When Brigham Young moved his family to Kirtland in the fall of 1833, his relationship with Joseph Smith began to deepen. At first he was so timid in the Prophet’s presence that he was tongue-tied. “I was with him several years before I pretended to open my mouth to speak at all,” President Young later confessed. Clearly uncertain about himself and full of awe for his teacher, he silently observed and listened, trying to digest even the Prophet’s smallest acts. “An angel never watched him closer than I did,” he said. 10 He would later recall that in Kirtland “in the days of Joseph I always took the opportunity, whenever possible, to attend High Council meetings [though he was not a member] that I might learn principle and wisdom from the mouth of the Prophet.” 11

For the first time in his life, he had found someone who could provide answers for his religious questions. He said that the Prophet Joseph Smith’s teachings brought heaven to earth and earth to heaven in “plainness and simplicity” so that “everybody could understand.” 12 Later, while serving as President of the Church, he looked back on the attention he had given to the Prophet Joseph Smith’s teaching as the key to his life’s success. 13

Schooled by Adversity

There were events that tested the new disciple, however. Although the Prophet Joseph Smith advised the Saints to build up Kirtland rather than using their labor to build up non-Latter-day Saint communities, many men left Kirtland in search of winter work. Brigham Young remained behind. “I made up my mind that I would stay in Kirtland, and work [for Church members] if I never got a farthing for it,” he said. It must have been a difficult decision; he had arrived in Kirtland with borrowed boots and pantaloons and a three- or four-year-old homemade coat, inadequate for winter. “If any man that ever did gather with the Saints was any poorer than I was,” he said, “it was because he had nothing.” 14

Yet despite Kirtland’s apparent lack of opportunity, he could get by. “The sun seldom if ever shone on my work before I had my tools in my hands and [was] busily engaged; and I rarely laid down my tools so long as I could see to use them. … I would gather a little here and a little there, and a day would not pass without its having sufficient food.” 15 In Brigham Young’s mind, “the Lord opened the way most astonishingly” because he obeyed the Prophet’s counsel. 16

At first the Young family lived on life’s margins. On one occasion in Kirtland Brigham Young was invited by the Prophet to attend certain sessions of instruction. The daytime sessions would prevent him from working and getting food for his family. Without a “mouthful of anything” in his home and fearing empty stomachs for his children, he nevertheless did what he was asked. When he left the school that evening, so great was the anxiety for his family that he remembered “drops of sweat stood on me” despite a stiff north wind and blowing snow. How was he to feed his family? His question was answered when a friend unexpectedly offered to loan him $25. Believing the money was a reward for obeying, Brigham flew home “like a dove” to provide for his children. 17

Lessons of Zion’s Camp

In May of 1834, Brigham Young responded to another of the Prophet Joseph Smith’s requests by enrolling in Zion’s Camp—a band of several hundred men that marched from Ohio to Missouri in hopes of protecting the Saints and peacefully regaining their lands in Jackson County. The camp’s procedures were hard. A horn roused the men at 3:00 A.M., and they ended some of their days after 11:00 P.M., or even midnight, having marched 40 miles. If these conditions were not difficult enough, the men at times pushed and pulled the camp’s baggage wagons through spring mud. And just as they were about to complete their 900-mile journey, disease struck and several members of the camp died. 18 Further, the Jackson County lands were not recovered.

Almost from the beginning of the march, “we had grumblers in that camp,” Brigham Young recalled. The camp’s casualties increased the despair some felt. Was the three-month ordeal and the tragedy of lost lives for nothing? That was not the view of the future President of the Church. He found spiritual value in the experience. “I told those brethren [who criticized] that I was well paid—paid with heavy interest—yea that my measure was filled to overflowing with the knowledge that I had received by traveling with the Prophet.” 19 Just as he had done during his first months in Kirtland, Brigham Young had closely observed his camp leader, taking mental notes on how an expedition might be led. This knowledge proved valuable when he later organized the Saints to travel to the Salt Lake Valley.

The Prophet Joseph Smith learned from the Zion’s Camp episode that Brigham Young was a man who could be depended upon, could be given important Church assignments. Also, when work began on the Kirtland Temple, it was Brigham Young who supervised the painting and finishing, often working side by side with Joseph Smith under the most trying of conditions.

Defender of the Prophet

In February 1835, Brigham Young received a call to the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles. He remembered the event well. He and his brother Joseph Young had preached and sung at a meeting, and afterwards, the Prophet had invited the two brothers to his home for further devotions. As they continued their singing, Joseph Smith was inspired to organize the Quorum and call Brigham Young as one of its members. “He had a revelation when we were singing to him,” Brigham Young recounted. “Those who were acquainted with him knew when the Spirit of revelation was upon him, for his countenance wore an expression peculiar to himself while under that influence.” 20

The call changed Brigham Young’s relationship with the Prophet Joseph Smith. No longer the retiring and silent newcomer to Kirtland, Elder Young now became the Prophet’s open defender. Sometimes this new role produced humorous situations, such as when a New York farmer by the name of Hawley went through Kirtland’s streets at night loudly and enthusiastically proclaiming Joseph Smith a fallen prophet. Brigham hastily dressed and confronted the man. I “assured him that if he did not stop his noise and let the people enjoy their sleep without interruption, I would cow-hide him on the spot, for we had the Lord’s Prophet right here, and we did not want the Devil’s prophet yelling round the streets.” 21

Some threats against Joseph Smith were more serious. “It seemed as though all creation was upon him, to hamper him in every way,” President Young remembered late in life. 22 During the construction of the Kirtland Temple, threats against the Prophet’s life were so constant that Elder Young slept “upon the floor scores and scores of nights ready to receive the mob that sought his life.” 23 On one occasion, hearing rumors of a possible assassination plot, he obtained a horse and buggy and met the stagecoach in which the Prophet was traveling. Elder Young safely escorted his friend through the final miles into Kirtland. 24

The new Apostle also defended his leader from opponents in the Church. When a few members argued that Joseph Smith should receive no revelations dealing with “temporal” topics, Elder Young entered the Kirtland Temple and challenged these men to provide an example of a prophet who had not given practical, everyday advice. 25 Emotions ran so high against Joseph Smith that the dissidents attempted to replace him with a new leader. Responding to this threat, Elder Young told them “in a plain and forcible manner … that Joseph was a Prophet, and I knew it, and that they might rail and slander him as much as they pleased, they could not destroy the appointment of the Prophet of God.” 26

Because of the rising clamor, during the winter of 1837-38 the Prophet Joseph Smith and Elder Young were forced to leave Kirtland and move to Missouri. Traveling in separate parties, they met at Dublin in eastern Indiana. The Prophet had a surprising request. “Brother Brigham,” he said, “I am destitute of means to pursue my journey. … I believe I shall throw myself upon you, and look to you for counsel in this case.” Elder Young could hardly believe his ears, so strange was this reversal of their roles. The Prophet was asking for his help. Recovering from his surprise, he arranged for a local Saint to loan the Prophet enough money to continue his journey. 27

The event indicated Brigham Young’s changing status. When called into the Twelve several years earlier, he was astonished because he felt inadequate for the position. Did not every elder in the Church know more than he? he wondered. 28 On one occasion he commented that when he was first called, some Church members felt he needed a “stool in order to reach high enough to tie the shoes” of the seemingly more accomplished elders. 29 It was a view that the Prophet clearly did not share: he saw talent behind Elder Young’s sometimes rough exterior and had experienced his loyalty and service firsthand.

Growing into his Role

Brigham Young continued to show his leadership traits in Missouri. After enemies imprisoned the Prophet and demanded that the Saints leave the state, Elder Young, as senior Apostle, directed the Church’s evacuation from Missouri. At a special conference, he insisted on an orderly removal, with special attention given to the poor. 30

He took the lead in another important matter. The Prophet had received a revelation instructing the Quorum of the Twelve to meet at Far West, Missouri, on 26 April 1839 to begin their mission to Great Britain. 31 Despite the prevailing persecution, Elder Young and his associates secretly traveled to western Missouri and very early in the morning followed the Lord’s direction. Elder Young later commented: “Thus was this revelation fulfilled, concerning which our enemies said, if all other revelations of Joseph Smith were fulfilled that one should not, as it had day and date to it [and they believed they could prevent it].” 32

Elder Young’s one-year mission to Great Britain, 1840-41, was another milestone in his personal growth. The Prophet had told him that he would have the power to receive revelation for those under his direction, and during his mission he felt this influence. “I had a fountain of knowledge with me,” he said, pleased and marveling. 33 While in Great Britain, he was formally sustained as President of the Quorum of the Twelve.

Several weeks after President Young returned to Nauvoo, the Prophet Joseph Smith received a revelation in his behalf. It declared that President Young’s past work in preaching the gospel was “acceptable” and promised him that he would no longer be required to leave his family for lengthy missionary tours. 34 The revelation also marked a change in the Quorum of the Twelve. Since its organization a half dozen years earlier, some of its members had worked at cross-purposes with the Prophet, who had as a result been hesitant to give them important assignments. 35 However, with Brigham Young now leading the Quorum, the group had the Prophet’s confidence. President Young remembered that the Prophet Joseph Smith met with them often and gave them the authority to handle “the business of the church in Nauvoo.” This authority included helping emigrants to settle in Nauvoo and selling them Church-owned land. 36

During these Nauvoo years, the relationship between the two men was further strengthened. For President Young, the Prophet was “the greatest man on earth” 37 and deserved his complete support. “It was my duty to throw … [my] influence around Joseph,” he later said. “Yes, I tied the people to Joseph Smith the Prophet. Every cord I could get hold of I hooked it to Joseph.” 38

On one occasion, the Church leader asked President Young to help him respond to members who were critical. For some time, prominent members had been conducting meetings at the home of the Prophet Joseph Smith which seemed calculated to undermine the Prophet’s influence. When President Smith and President Young entered the house, the speaker was extolling the virtues of scripture as a test of truth but said nothing of the need for a prophet and seer. When the speaker sat down, the Prophet asked his friend to speak. “I felt like a thousand lions,” President Young later recalled. Placing each book of scripture on the stand, he declared to the audience that he would not “give the ashes of a rye straw” for the books without the accompanying teachings of “the living oracles of God.” He emphasized strongly that without living prophets The Church of Jesus Christ was “no better than” other churches of the world. 39

The Prophet Joseph Smith appreciated President Young’s support and spoke warmly about his disciple. Later, the second Church President would recall the Prophet telling him that he—Brigham Young—was no longer susceptible to apostasy, for there were “certain bounds set to men, and if a man [is] faithful and pure to these bounds, God will take him out of the world if he sees him falter—he’ll take him to himself.” 40 Three months before the Martyrdom, as the two men walked together through Nauvoo, the Prophet again expressed confidence in his friend and awareness of President Young’s role in the Church organization. “If I am moved out of the way,” the Prophet said, “you are the only man living on this earth who can counsel and direct the affairs of the kingdom of God on the earth.” 41

“The Keys … Are Right Here”

In fact, during the last years of his life, the Prophet Joseph Smith increasingly spoke of his approaching death. President Young and the other Apostles did not understand. The possibility of the Prophet’s soon dying “was taken from us,” President Young recalled. 42 However, while preaching in the East, President Young had a spiritual experience which he later understood was meant to prepare him for the Prophet’s death. As President Young sat in a train depot in Boston, a heavy depression swept over him that made conversation difficult. The experience came at the very time when Joseph and Hyrum were killed, 43 he said later.

Two and one-half weeks after the Prophet’s death, President Young, while visiting a member in Peterboro, Massachusetts, heard the awful news. Normally a master of his emotions, he recalled that after learning of Joseph Smith’s death, he experienced such a severe headache that tears came to his eyes. With Joseph and Hyrum Smith gone, he remembered asking himself, “Is the priesthood taken from the Earth?” In the next few moments, the organization of the Church passed through President Young’s mind, and then the forceful thought came to him “like a clap”: “The keys of the kingdom are right here with the Church.” 44

When he returned to Nauvoo, a congregation, formally organized into various priesthood offices, sustained the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles as the Church’s presiding authority—an act that sustained Brigham Young, President of the Quorum, as the Church’s leader. “I have spared no pains to learn my lesson of the Kingdom in the Eternal worlds,” he told the assembled Saints. 45 He referred, in part, to his more than 10-year role as a careful observer of Joseph Smith’s teaching and leadership.

The Prophet’s Continuing Influence

Joseph Smith’s presence lingered in President Brigham Young’s life in several ways. When President Young sought a place to establish the Saints in the American West, he studied maps, government reports, and other sources of information. He also sought spiritual direction. In an 1869 sermon, President George A. Smith, First Counselor in the First Presidency, recalled that when “every trouble and calamity” seemed to beset the Saints in Nauvoo, President Young fasted and prayed frequently for guidance. Thereafter he experienced “a vision of Joseph Smith, who showed him the mountain that we now call Ensign Peak, immediately north of Salt Lake City, and there was an ensign fell upon that peak, and Joseph said ‘Build under the point where the colors fall and you will prosper and have peace.’ ” President Young knew he was to settle in the Salt Lake Valley. 46

While the Saints were camped at Winter Quarters, President Young was again inspired by the Prophet Joseph Smith. President Young later recounted a vivid dream in which he talked with his friend. “Why is it that we cannot be together as we used to be?” he asked the Prophet plaintively. President Young also asked for instruction on how he should lead the Saints. The Prophet told him that Church members must maintain the Spirit in their lives, for the Spirit will “take malice, hatred, strife and all evil from their hearts; and their whole desire will be to do good, bring forth righteousness and build up the kingdom of God.” Finally, the Prophet taught his successor about the pattern of organization of God’s family under the priesthood’s sealing ordinances. “This I cannot describe,” President Young said later, but he “saw where the Priesthood had been taken from the earth and how it must be joined together, so that there would be a perfect chain from Father Adam to his latest posterity.” 47

Later President Young had still another significant dream involving the Prophet Joseph Smith, during the 1849 California gold rush. Like other Americans, some Saints seemed willing to abandon their homes for the prospect of striking it rich in California. The mania worried President Young. Would the Utah settlements be decimated? Had all the work and resources expended to bring the Saints to the Great Basin been for nothing? After a “good deal of praying,” President Young dreamed of the Prophet, who seemed to be driving a large herd of sheep and goats a few miles north of Salt Lake City. Some of these animals were large and beautiful; others were small and dirty. President Young remembered looking into his friend’s eyes and laughing, just as he had often done when Joseph Smith was alive. “Joseph,” he said, “you have got the darndest flock … I ever saw in my life; what are you going to do with them?” The Prophet, who seemed unconcerned about his mixed flock, said simply: “They are all good in their places.”

When President Young awoke, he realized that while the Church’s missionaries might gather a variety of “sheep and goats” as converts, it was not necessary for him to worry unduly if some moved away from the Church’s gathering place. As converts sorted themselves out, his responsibility was to accept them all—goats as well as sheep—and help them realize their potential in the Kingdom. The message relieved President Young’s anxiety and became an important guide in his conduct of Church affairs. 48

His dreams involving the Prophet Joseph Smith became less frequent as the years passed after the Prophet’s death, perhaps because of the growing confidence Brigham Young had in his own experience as a leader. However, he continued to speak often of the Prophet, testifying of him repeatedly, until his own death in 1877. He often expressed his personal debt to Joseph Smith, who had helped to make him what he had become. President Young testified that he had followed the Prophet because Joseph Smith was a “man of God” who had received and taught “the revelations of Jesus Christ.” 49 Brigham Young said he did not “serve” Joseph Smith the man, but the doctrine of Christ “the Lord has revealed through him.” 50

“What made me love Joseph so?” he once asked. It was because he “never spared any pains to do me good. I knew when my hand met his that he would lay down his life for me.” 51 President Young admired so many of Joseph Smith’s qualities, especially his abject humility when approaching Deity in prayer. “I never saw Joseph but [when he] was always so before the Lord.” 52

President Young believed that few of the Prophet’s mortal contemporaries, including members of the Church, fully realized Joseph Smith’s great worth. But Brigham Young cherished and loved him for the Prophet’s ocean of spiritual knowledge and for the greatness of his character. 53 Because he had known the Prophet so intimately, Brigham Young could testify that Joseph Smith “lived as good as any man on the earth.” Indeed, “no man ever honored his mission more,” except the Savior. 54 When President Young died, one of his children at his bedside reported that the Prophet was once more on Brigham Young’s mind. “Joseph! Joseph! Joseph!” were the last words Brigham Young spoke before passing on. 55

 

Joseph was very tolerant of others, Brigham was not, and he needed to be taught.  He was thankful for Joseph’s teachings but was a disciple of Jesus Christ.

The winter of 1849-1850 was brutal, many wanted to leave.  D&C 136:11, the Lord will have a tried people, test their faith.

Elder Wirthlin:

Faith is . . . Absolute confidence in things we cannot see but are true

Faith is . . . Correct action

Faith is . . . In absolute conformity to the Lord’s will and His timetable

Brigham heard the complaints and the murmurings and immediately took his stand opposing any who wanted to withdraw from the valley. Under date of December 7th, he writes:

 

"Some few have caught the gold fever. I counseled such, and all the Saints to remain in these valleys of the mountains and make improvements, build comfortable houses and raise grain against the days of famine and pestilence with which the earth would be visited."

 

I shall here again quote from James Brown's autobiography. It tells the thrilling story of that winter, better than I have found it recorded elsewhere:

 

"The winter of 1848-49 was quite cold. Many people had their feet badly frozen. For one, the writer suffered so severely from this cause that he lost every nail from the toes of both feet. In February and March there began to be some uneasiness over the prospects, and as the days grew warmer the gold fever attacked many so that they prepared to go to California. Some said they would go only to have a place for the rest of us; for they thought Brigham Young too smart a man to try to establish a civilized colony in such a 'God-forsaken country,' as they called the valley. They further said that California was the natural country for the Saints; some had brought choice fruit pips and seed, but said they would not waste them by planting in a country like the Great Salt Lake Valley; others stated that they would not build a house in the valley, but would remain in their wagons, and in the spring would be going on to California, Oregon or Vancouver's Island; still others said they would wait awhile before planting choice fruits, as it would not be long before they would return to Jackson County, Missouri. . . . .

 

"It was at this time of gloom that President Young stood before the whole people, and said, in substance, that some people had misgivings, and some were murmuring, and had not faith to go to work and make their families comfortable; they had got the gold fever and were going to California. Said he: 'Some have asked me about going. I have told them that God has appointed this place for the gathering of his Saints, and you will do better right here than you will by going to the gold mines. Some have thought they would go there and get fitted out and come back, but I told them to stop here and get fitted out. Those who stop here and are faithful to God and his people will make more money and get richer than you that run after the god of this world; and I promise you in the name of the Lord that many of you that go thinking you will get rich and come back, will wish you had never gone away from here, and will long to come back, but will not be able to do so. Some of you will come back, but your friends who remain here will have to help you; and the rest of you who are spared to return will not make as much money as your brethren do who stay here and help build up the Church and Kingdom of God; they will prosper and be able to buy you twice over. Here is the place God has appointed for his people.

 

"'We have been kicked out of the frying pan into the fire, out of the fire into the middle of the floor, and here we are and here we will stay. God has shown me that this is the spot to locate his people, and here is where they will prosper; he will temper the elements for the good of his Saints; he will rebuke the frost and the sterility of the soil, and the land shall become fruitful. Brethren, go to, now, and plant out your fruit seeds.'

 

"Stretching his arms to the east and to the west, with his hands spread out, he said:

 

"For in these elements are not only all the cereals common to this latitude, but the apple, peach and plum; yea, and the more delicate fruits, the strawberry and raspberry; and we will raise the grapes here and manufacture wine; and as the Saints gather here and get strong enough to possess the land, God will temper the climate, and we shall build a city and a temple to the Most High God in this place. We will extend our settlements to the east and west, to the north and to the south, and we will build towns and cities by the hundreds, and thousands of the Saints will gather in from the nations of the earth. This will become the great highway of the nations. Kings and emperors and the noble and wise of the earth will visit us here, while the wicked and ungodly will envy us our comfortable homes and possessions. Take courage, brethren. I can stand in my door and can see where there is untold millions of the rich treasures of the earth—gold and silver. But the time has not come for the Saints to dig gold. It is our duty first to develop the agricultural resources of the country, for there is no country on the earth that is more productive than this. We have the finest climate, the best water, and the purest air that can be found on earth; there is no healthier climate anywhere. As for gold and silver, and the rich minerals of the earth, there is no other country that equals this; but let them alone; let others seek them, and we will cultivate the soil; for if the mines are opened first, we are a thousand miles from any base of supplies and the people would rush in here in such great numbers that they would breed a famine; and gold would not do us or them any good if there were no provisions in the land. People would starve to death with barrels of gold; they would be willing to give a barrel of gold for a barrel of flour rather than starve to death. Then, brethren, plow your land and sow wheat, plant your potatoes; let the mines alone until the time comes for you to hunt gold, though I do not think this people ever will become a mining people. It is our duty to preach the gospel, gather Israel, pay our tithing, and build temples. The worst fear that I have about this people is that they will get rich in this country, forget God and his people, wax fat, and kick themselves out of the Church and go to hell. This people will stand mobbing, robbing, poverty, and all manner of persecution, and be true. But my greater fear for them is that they cannot stand wealth; and yet they have to be tried with riches, for they will become the richest people on this earth.'"—Autobiography of James Brown, pp. 119-123.

(Preston Nibley, Brigham Young: The Man and His Work, 4th ed.[Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1960], 126.)

The gathering is not simply here but also into the eternities, families linking to their ancestors through the sealing power of the Temples.  We will ALL be gathered back to Adam, every last one of us.

Bruce discussed the Pacific missions of Addison Pratt.

ADDISON PRATT'S MISSION TO THE SOCIETY ISLANDSSOUTH PACIFIC OCEAN

 

"It was moved and seconded that Elder Addison Pratt, James Brown, and Hiram H. Blackwell, go to the Society Islands to preach the gospel. Carried." Such the action of the conference of October 6th, 1849; and shortly afterwards these men left the valley on their way to the islands. Sometime previous to starting upon this mission, Addison Pratt, who had been a faithful elder for many years, but on account of his absence on previous missions in the South Pacific Islands had not had an opportunity to receive the endowment ceremonies of the temple, was taken to the summit of Ensign Peak and there received those sacred ordinances, the mountain being dedicated especially for that purpose. fn This action was in harmony with the instructions of the Prophet in Nauvoo when he said that these ordinances of the temple under certain circumstances might be obtained on the mountain top, as Moses did them. fn

 

This mission of Addison Pratt's was but a renewal of his labors in the Pacific Islands, previously mentioned in these pages; but his second advent among the natives of those islands, with his new companions was not only a renewal but an enlargement of the work which has continued without abatement until the present, resulting in the conversion of thousands of those people to a true faith in God, and an acceptance of the Christ as the Redeemer of the world.

 

(B. H. Roberts, A Comprehensive History of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 6 vols. [Salt Lake City: Deseret News Press, 1930], 3: 413.)

Joshua 3:9-17 – Test of faith, water on the feet.  Plant the fruit trees, establish His work and He will temper the climate for our good, don’t look for gold and silver!  Prophets can keep their focus.

Bruce read a prophesy of Heber C. Kimball of the goods being cheaper in SLC then in St. Louis, it was borne out later to be true.

To prophesy] That is, to speak in the name of the Lord, whether of things present, past, or future. This is a special gift. The Prophet Joseph had it in the highest degree. Heber C. Kimball also had the gift highly developed. At times he could see into the future as if it were an open book. During the time of famine in Salt Lake valley in 1847, when many subsisted on roots and hides of animals, and knew not where to obtain bread or clothing necessary, owing to the devastation by crickets, President Kimball declared in a public meeting that, within a short time, "state goods" would be sold in the streets of Salt Lake City cheaper than in New York, and that the people should be abundantly supplied with food and clothing. Many who heard him refused to believe. He himself said he was afraid he had missed it. But the prophecy came true. Very soon the California gold-hunters came through the Valley. Salt Lake City became their resting-place, and they were glad to exchange their goods for whatever they could get. Many of them threw goods away, or sold them for a song, in order to lighten their wagons and be able to make better progress (Whitney's Life of Heber C. Kimball, p. 401-2).

(Hyrum M. Smith and Janne M. Sjodahl, Doctrine and Covenants Commentary [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1978], 275.)

Elder Charles C. Rich said he didn’t believe a word of it!  Elder J. Golden Kimball CR 1930

 

Utah War – Thought of Brigham Young

June 3, 2004

 

July 24, 1857 – Brigham Young wanted 10 years of peace from the outside world and he got it. 

There was tremendous miscommunication and distrust on both sides, the US Government and the Church.  The experiences the church had with governments was understandable.  The government did not think Mormons were loyal to the country, after all, how can you have Brigham Young the leader of both religion and government at the same time?

Importance of the railroad:

1.     Emigration to the west

2.     Moving materials from the canyons to complete the SLC temple

3.     Economy

Thomas Kane warned Church leaders about becoming a territory instead of a state.  A territory would be controlled by the Federal government; a state would be controlled by the populous.

Mountain Meadows Massacre – Think of this great tragedy in the context of the US Army coming to wipe out the Saints once and for all.  Charles C. Rich and George A. Smith befriended the group in their journey through Utah.  However, the Missouri part of the group talked openly of their hatred of Mormons and their actions in driving the Saints out of their state.

MOTIVES PROMPTING THE MASSACRE

 

Mountain Meadows Massacre This gives fear a large place among the motives that led to the crime of the Mountain Meadows. It has already been stated that the course of the emigrants in passing through the southern settlements had awakened the resentment of the people. Though much of their boasting about participation in the Missouri and Illinois "Mormon" troubles may have been the mere bravado of the "Missouri Wildcats;" and their threats against the then presiding "Mormon" leaders, and their expressed intention to return in force and destroy the Latter-day Saint settlements, may have been but the vain ranting of the reckless spirits of the camp, yet it was suicidal to indulge in that bravado and such ranting. It would have been so in any community who had suffered such injustice as the Latter-day Saints had suffered; with which suffering they were now taunted, and of which there was now—as the settlers viewed it—a threatened repetition, and in which repetition the reckless part of this company of emigrants expressed determination to participate. Such procedure even under normal conditions would have aroused resentments and led to trouble, and most likely to some acts of violence. But to make these boasts, and to indulge in these threats at a time when great excitement prevailed in the "Mormon" settlements, and the war spirit of the people was aroused by reports of the approach of an invading army whose purpose the saints were left to suspect by their cruel experiences with state troops in both Missouri and Illinois—for the Arkansas emigrants to indulge in boastings of past achievements with armed movements against the saints, to swagger and threaten a repetition of these things was, under all the circumstances, to invite calamity. And now that one of their number had been shot down by white men, and they had evidence that white settlers of Utah were leagued with the Indians, it doubtless made it easy for some of the leaders to persuade the white settlers gathered at Mountain Meadows to conclude that the emigrants if allowed to escape would be able to carry out their threat of returning from California with the necessary force to destroy the "Mormon" settlements. And so I say this fear became a weighty argument in determining the fate of the emigrant company. fn

 

Mountain Meadows Massacre The fate of the emigrants was debated among the leaders of the white settlers at the Meadows; we need not attempt to trace the discussion in detail where there is so much that is unreliable on account of the character of the witnesses, and so much that is contradictory. Nor is it possible to know the distress and suffering of the besieged emigrants. It is known, however, that their suffering was very great. Their corral of wagons was some distance from the spring on the north side of which they had camped, and they could get no water without exposing themselves to the attacks of the Indians who watched the spring; and the same is true as to wood, though at intervals, and usually at night, both were obtained, but at great risk. Great and sickening must have been their consternation when they learned from their man who had escaped from the Pinto assault that white men as well as the Indians were arrayed against them.

 

 

(B. H. Roberts, A Comprehensive History of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 6 vols. [Salt Lake City: Deseret News Press, 1930], 4: 158 - 159.)

Brigham Young was tired of being pushed around

As I said this morning, ten years ago on this ground I stated that we would not ask any odds of our enemies in ten years from that date; and the next time that I thought of it was ten years afterwards to a day. "They are now sending their troops" was the news; and it directly occurred to me, "Will you ask any odds of them?" No; in the name of Israel's God we will not; for as soon as we ask odds, we get ends—of bayonets. When we have asked them for bread, they have given us stones; and when we have asked them for meat, they have given us scorpions; and what is the use in asking any more? I do not ask any odds of those who are striving to deprive us of every vestige of freedom and to destroy us from the earth.

 

Suppose that we should now bow down, and they should order their troops back, and then send a Governor and other officers here, how long would it be before some miserable scamp would get into a fuss with the Indians in Utah County, or in some other county, and get killed? Then the Governor would order out the Militia—probably two or three hundred men—to kill off those Indians. Well, the brethren, knowing that the aggressor is a white man, do not want to turn out and, like Gen. Harney, kill the squaws; and they say, "We shall not go." Then the Governor would say, "They have committed treason;" and it would be, "Send an army here, and shoot and hang them." Our enemies are determined to bring us into collision with the Government, so that they can kill us; but they shall not come here.

 

If the troops are now this side of Laramie, remember that the Sweetwater is this side of that place. They must have some place to winter, for they cannot come through here this season. We could go out and use them up, and it would not require fifty men to do it. But probably we shall not have occasion to take that course, for we do not want to kill men. They may winter in peace at some place east of us; but when spring comes, they must go back to the States, or, at any rate, they must leave the mountains.

 

We have no desire to kill men, but we wish to keep the devils from killing us. If you hear that they are near the upper crossing of the Platte, they will probably stay there till they can collect 50,000 troops. We will say that 9 and 3 equal 17; and if that is so, how long will it take to get those troops here? Let an arithmetician figure out how long it will be before 9 and 3 will make 17; for that will just be as soon as our enemies will get 50,000 troops here.

 

We have got to be called treasoners by our enemies. Joseph was taken up six times, if I remember rightly, on the charge of treason. Once he was brought into court by some enemies who thought they could prove that he had committed adultery, and that they termed treason. At another time our brethren wanted to vote in Davies County, Missouri, and said they would cast their votes and have their rights with other citizens; whereupon Joseph was taken up for treason. Another time, he was taken up on a charge of high treason; and when he came before the grand jury, his enemies wanted to prove that he had more than one wife, asserting that that was high treason.

 

Our enemies are constantly yelling "Rebellion! Treason!" no matter how peaceful, orderly, and loyal we may be. And now to come out in open opposition to their cursed, corrupt practices, will of course be counted treason. But let me tell you that the real, actual treason is committed in Washington, by the administrators of our Government sending an army to take the lives of innocent citizens. Every man is allowed by the Constitution to have what religion he pleases and to profess what religion he pleases. That liberty is guaranteed by the Constitution; "but you, 'Mormons,' an army must be sent against you, because you are Latter-day Saints." Yes, an army must be sent to drive us from the earth.

 

There is high treason in Washington; and if the law was carried out, it would hang up many of them. And the very act of James K. Polk in taking five hundred of our men, while we were making our way out of the country under an agreement forced upon us, would have hung him between the heavens and the earth, if the laws had been faithfully executed. And now, if they can send a force against this people, we have every constitutional and legal right to send them to hell, and we calculate to send them there.

 

When I get over being angry, I may preach something else; but the past travels and sufferings of this people through mobocracy are before me.

 

I am not speaking of the Government, but of the corrupt administrators of the Government. They make me think of a sign in New York, upon which was lettered, "All manner of twisting and turning done here." It is just so in Washington city; they can twist and turn in any and every way, to suit their hellish appetites.

(Journal of Discourses, 26 vols. [London: Latter-day Saints' Book Depot, 1854-1886], 5: 234.)

Emotions are God given, so they are Celestial.  Do you control your emotions or do they control you?  We should hate iniquity and sin etc.  BY was very angry!

We have known all the time that the kingdoms of darkness were opposed to the kingdom of God—that the powers of earth and hell were combined against it. Christ and Baal cannot make friends with each other: you cannot mix oil and water, righteousness and wickedness. This is the kingdom of God; all others are of Devil. They never can be united in this world, nor in any other: there is no possibility of the two kingdoms becoming one. Those who believe and obey the Gospel of the Son of God, and forsake all for its interests, belong to the kingdom of God, and all the rest belong to the other kingdom. There is a distinction, and the line must be drawn; and you and I have to stand up to it, even though it may take from us our right eyes and right hands. We must stand up to the line and maintain the kingdom of God, or we will all go to destruction together.

(Journal of Discourses, 26 vols. [London: Latter-day Saints' Book Depot, 1854-1886], 5: 233.)

It’s the wicked men in government and the lust for power that brings the Army out west.

The murder of Parley P. Pratt and the return of Thomas B. Marsh happened at this time period.

Thomas B. Marsh, at a later day (1857), returned to the Church. September 4, 1857, he arrived in Salt Lake City. He had crossed the plains from Harrison County, Missouri. Two days after his arrival he addressed a congregation in the tabernacle and in his remarks said: "I can say, in reference to the quorum of the twelve, to which I belonged, that I did not consider myself a whit behind any of them, and I suppose that others had the same opinion; but let no one feel too secure; for before you think of it, your steps will slide. You will not then think nor feel for a moment as you did before you lost the Spirit of Christ; for when men apostatize, they are left to grovel in the dark. ** But let me tell you, my brethren and friends, if you do not want to suffer in body and mind, as I have done; if there are any of you that have the seeds of apostasy in you, do not let them make their appearance, but nip that spirit in the bud; for it is misery and affliction in this world, and destruction in the world to come." (Deseret News, Sept. 16, 1857.) He was a broken man in health and spirit, and showed that the hand of affliction had been over him. "If you want to see the fruits of apostasy," he would say, "Look at me!"

(Joseph Fielding Smith, Church History and Modern Revelation, 4 vols. [Salt Lake City: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 1946-1949], 3: 149 - 150.)

 

 

Civil War – Self Reliance

July 1, 2004

 

The church during the Civil War time period was one of growth and peace for the church.  The heat from the government was elsewhere!  Expansion of settlements continues during this time period.

JS Matthew – Jerusalem will be destroyed a 2nd time by the gentiles before the 2nd coming.

The coming of the railroad was seen as both a blessing and a curse.  It will cut into the isolation of the church by bring in the world, it will be easier for immigration of the saints, it will help the economy, yet worldly influences will creep in and Brigham Young warned the saints repeatedly about that.  Some wanted to travel to Utah to “civilize” the saints.  JD 12, October 8, 1868.

Moses 7:18 – No poor among them (temporal) + Dwelt in righteousness (spiritual)

Self reliance is critical to attain the Celestial kingdom, freedom to act gives self reliance, of course we need the Atonement of Christ, but we must learn to act for ourselves as in D&C 78:13-14.

In describing the reason for the concentrated effort launched in 1936, the First Presidency explained that "the real purpose of the Church [Welfare] Plan is to assist each individual to secure independence, to help make him self-supporting, to replace idleness with thrift and productivity." fn Similarly, almost a century ago, President Joseph F. Smith said: "It is the purpose of God in restoring the gospel and the holy Priesthood not only to benefit mankind spiritually, but also to benefit them temporally." fn

 

As used in this setting, the words temporal and spiritual require clarification. Temporal signifies what pertains to mortal life, including food, shelter, employment, and property. Spiritual signifies what pertains to eternity, including faith, repentance, sanctification, covenants, and ordinances. Since temporal choices have spiritual consequences, and vice versa, temporal and spiritual are inseparable in the long run. To God, all things are spiritual, and none of his commands are temporal. (D&C 29:34-35.) Still, in the short run of mortality, it is sometimes useful to identify temporary and worldly things as temporal and less worldly and more heavenly things (the things of eternity) as spiritual. That is the sense in which President Joseph F. Smith used those words, and that is the sense in which they are used in the remainder of this chapter.

 

Temporal and spiritual objectives always go hand in hand in the Lord's plan, but the spiritual should always be primary in church-administered programs. Individual charitable acts and various charitable organizations can administer to the temporal needs of the poor, but only priesthood-directed and church-sponsored welfare activities can administer to the spiritual needs of those who are assisted and of those who assist them. President Marion G. Romney taught this principle succinctly when he said, "The prime duty of help to the poor by the Church is not to bring temporal relief to their needs, but salvation to their souls." fn

 

The Savior taught the preeminence of the spiritual over the temporal. When Mary anointed Jesus' feet with costly ointment, Judas asked, "Why was not this ointment sold for three hundred pence, and given to the poor?" Jesus' reply taught a great principle to his followers: "Let her alone: against the day of my burying hath she kept this. For the poor always ye have with you; but me ye have not always." (John 12:5, 7-8.) Thus, while the care of the poor was important, its importance should be seen in a spiritual context. In this instance, there was something more important to do with this ointment than to give its value to the poor. The things of eternity, including what Jesus could teach his followers concerning the salvation of their souls and what he could do for them by his death and resurrection, were more important than the temporal care of the poor. Indeed, one reason we have the poor "always . . . with [us]" is to give the rest of us the spiritual testing and growth that come when we minister to their needs.

 

The preeminence of the spiritual over the temporal, which Jesus taught, has many applications in our own day. For example, it explains why our church spends great sums preaching the restored gospel and building temples to perform the ordinances of eternity rather than (as some advocate) devoting these same resources to temporal concerns already being pursued by others, such as preserving the environment, researching cures for diseases, or administering to other physical needs that can be accomplished without priesthood power or direction.

 

All of the modern prophets who have carried the major responsibility of explaining the Lord's way in the relief of the poor have stressed the predominance of spiritual over temporal goals. This includes Presidents David O. McKay, Spencer W. Kimball, Ezra Taft Benson, J. Reuben Clark, Henry D. Moyle, Marion G. Romney, Gordon B. Hinckley, and Thomas S. Monson. All have stressed the importance of methods that build the spirit as well as nourish the body.

 

In a notable message on welfare, delivered while he was president of the Church, Spencer W. Kimball listed the six "specific principles that undergird this work." He declared: "Only as we apply these truths can we approach the ideal of Zion. . . . This highest order of priesthood society is founded on the doctrines of [1] love, [2] service, [3] work, [4] self-reliance, and [5] stewardship, all of which are circumscribed by [6] the covenant of consecration." fn Note that most of these are spiritual principles whose temporal or material significance is only indirect.

 

Other teachings stress that the Lord's way of caring for the poor and needy hallows those who give, because they act voluntarily, and exalts those who receive by teaching them the privilege of participating in a heavenly venture by contributing whatever their abilities permit. (D&C 104:16.) "The Lord's way builds individual self-esteem and develops and heals the dignity of the individual, whereas the world's way depresses the individual's view of himself and causes deep resentment," President Kimball explained. fn "When viewed in this light, we can see that Welfare Services is not a program, but the essence of the gospel. It is the gospel in action. It is the crowning principle of a Christian life." fn

 

(Dallin H. Oaks, The Lord's Way [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1991], 109.)

Self-Reliance. "No amount of philosophizing, excuses, or rationalizing will ever change the fundamental need for self-reliance," said President Spencer W. Kimball (Ensign, May 1978, p. 79). Indeed, from the beginning of time, mortals have been counseled by God and His prophets to be self-reliant, to earn their own way, to be independent, and to avoid temporal or spiritual bondage. Such bondage may range from an attitude that "the world owes me a living" to drug or alcohol dependency, unwise debt, or the spiritual bondage of sin. Bondage may arise from excessive dependency on others, including ecclesiastical leaders. Those who are so bound expect others to make moral and spiritual decisions for them. Sometimes, as Elder Boyd K. Packer has wisely pointed out, bishops and other leaders become unwitting accomplices in establishing and maintaining that dependency. He said:

 

Bishops, keep constantly in mind that fathers are responsible to preside over their families.

 

Sometimes, with all good intentions, we require so much of both the children and the father that he is not able to do so.

 

If my boy needs counseling, bishop, it should be my responsibility first, and yours second.

 

If my boy needs recreation, bishop, I should provide it first, and you second.

 

If my boy needs correction, that should be my responsibility first, and yours second.

 

If I am failing as a father, help me first and my children second.

 

Do not be too quick to take over from me the job of raising my children.

 

Do not be too quick to counsel them and solve all of the problems. Get me involved. It is my ministry. (Ensign, May 1978, p. 93.)

 

Why is it that God places such emphasis on the principle of self-reliance? The answer becomes clear when we understand that self-reliance is closely tied to freedom.

 

The scriptures are clear in telling us that freedom is a God-given principle of life. Samuel the Lamanite proclaimed: "Behold, ye are free; ye are permitted to act for yourselves; for behold, God hath given unto you knowledge and he hath made you free." (Helaman 14:30.) We cannot be free if we are not self-reliant. Put another way, self-reliance is a prerequisite for freedom, and dependence is the enemy of freedom. The scriptures (D&C 29:24-35) tell us that man is intended by God to be "an agent unto himself." He cannot do so unless he is self-reliant. Independence and self-reliance thus are critical keys to spiritual growth. Whenever we are in a situation that threatens self-reliance, we will find that freedom is threatened too.

 

Although self-reliance and freedom are tied together, there is nothing spiritual, in and of itself, in being self-reliant. In our laudable strivings to attain self-reliance, we must be careful not to rely too much on the arm of flesh and to remember that we are wholly reliant upon God for all of life's blessings, including life itself. One could be self-reliant—completely independent—and lack every other desirable attribute of character. I think of a man who was one of the most wealthy men in the world, an American oil baron. He is dead now, but while he lived, a more miserable soul would have been hard to find. Grasping, conniving, greedy, incapable of giving, concerned only with getting, his wealth had cankered his soul. His self-reliance did him no good. Self-reliant does not mean self-centered!

 

Self-reliance, then, is not an end but a means to an end. Self-reliance becomes a factor in spiritual growth only as we use the freedom it brings to make the right choices. In particular, those who are self-reliant are free to serve others. The Nephite Prophet Jacob said, "Think of your brethren like unto yourselves, and be familiar with all and free with your substance, that they may be rich like unto you. But before ye seek for riches, seek ye for the kingdom of God. And after ye have obtained a hope in Christ ye shall obtain riches, if ye seek them; and ye will seek them for the intent to do good—to clothe the naked, and to feed the hungry, and to liberate the captive, and administer relief to the sick and the afflicted." (Jacob 2:17-19.) In other words, we are to use earthly resources to serve others.

 

Service is linked to sacrifice. It is through sacrifice that we become sanctified and purified. I think of a family in the Liverpool England Stake, in whose home I visited a few years ago. A child in the home had been born with a rare metabolic disease that prevented her from growing and developing normally. Though she was eight years old when I saw her, the poor little thing weighed only about twenty pounds. Bedridden, still an infant, she cried in pain every few minutes. Her devoted mother tenderly cared for the youngster day and night and had not enjoyed an uninterrupted night's sleep since the child's birth. The mother was always there, easing her child's pain, whatever the hour. In the process of sharing and enduring suffering, that good woman had become sanctified. Her face was that of an angel of mercy. The purity of her soul was apparent to all. She had become a handmaiden of the Lord, united with Him in her work of mercy and love.

 

(Alexander B. Morrison, Visions of Zion [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1993], 110.)

Also President Marion G. Romney’s Welfare address in October 1982, “Celestial Nature of Self Reliance”

The Celestial Nature of Self-reliance

President Marion G. Romney
Second Counselor in the First Presidency
Conference Report, Oct. 1982, 132-136; or Ensign, Nov. 1982, 91-93

Brothers and sisters, I have been asked to speak in so many of these welfare meetings that I'm beginning to feel that I ought to respond in a manner similar to a grandfather I once knew who was getting along in years and some people thought he didn't know when to quit talking. At a ward gathering they thought they shouldn't call on him because he would speak too long. Their final decision was, however, that they couldn't pass him by, so they called on him and asked him to stand and tell them in just a word how they could live to be as old as he was and still be of service. So he got up and said, "Keep breathing." I won't be that brief, but I will attempt to be to the point.
 

Self-reliance and freedom
I love the simple truths contained in the welfare principles as taught by all the holy prophets since the world began, and I never tire of speaking about them. Today I shall speak to you about the principle of self-reliance and its impact upon our spiritual development.

Since the beginning of time man has been counseled to earn his own way, thereby becoming self-reliant. It is easy to understand the reason why the Lord places so much emphasis on this principle when we come to understand that it is tied very closely to freedom itself.

On this subject, Elder Albert E. Bowen said, "The Lord must want and intend that His people shall be free of constraint whether enforceable or only arising out of the bindings of conscience. . . . That is why the Church is not satisfied with any system which leaves able people permanently dependent, and insists, on the contrary, that the true function and office of giving, is to help people [get] into a position where they can help themselves and thus be free." (The Church Welfare Plan, Gospel Doctrine manual, 1946, p. 77.)

Many programs have been set up by well-meaning individuals to aid those who are in need. However, many of these programs are designed with the shortsighted objective of "helping people," as opposed to "helping people help themselves." Our efforts must always be directed toward making able-bodied people self-reliant.
 

Gullible gulls
I clipped the following article from the Reader's Digest some time ago and have told it before, but it bears repeating. It reads:

"In our friendly neighbor city of St. Augustine great flocks of sea gulls are starving amid plenty. Fishing is still good, but the gulls don't know how to fish. For generations they have depended on the shrimp fleet to toss them scraps from the nets. Now the fleet has moved. . . .

"The shrimpers had created a Welfare State for the . . . sea gulls. The big birds never bothered to learn how to fish for themselves and they never taught their children to fish. Instead they led their little ones to the shrimp nets.

"Now the sea gulls, the fine free birds that almost symbolize liberty itself, are starving to death because they gave in to the 'something for nothing' lure! They sacrificed their independence for a handout.

"A lot of people are like that, too. They see nothing wrong in picking delectable scraps from the tax nets of the U.S. Government's 'shrimp fleet.' But what will happen when the Government runs out of goods? What about our children of generations to come?

"Let's not be gullible gulls. We . . . must preserve our talents of self-sufficiency, our genius for creating things for ourselves, our sense of thrift and our true love of independence." ("Fable of the Gullible Gull," Reader's Digest, Oct. 1950, p. 32.)
 

Don't sacrifice self-respect and independence
The practice of coveting and receiving unearned benefits has now become so fixed in our society that even men of wealth, possessing the means to produce more wealth, are expecting the government to guarantee them a profit. Elections often turn on what the candidates promise to do for voters from government funds. This practice, if universally accepted and implemented in any society, will make slaves of its citizens.

We cannot afford to become wards of the government, even if we have a legal right to do so. It requires too great a sacrifice of self-respect and in political, temporal, and spiritual independence.

In some countries it is extremely difficult to separate earned from unearned benefits. However, the principle is the same in all countries: We should strive to become self-reliant and not depend on others for our existence.
 

Caution to parents and priesthood leaders
Governments are not the only guilty parties. We fear many parents in the Church are making "gullible gulls" out of their children with their permissiveness and their doling out of family resources. Parents who place their children on the dole are just as guilty as a government which places its citizens on the dole. In fact, the actions of parents in this area can be more devastating than any government program.

Bishops and other priesthood leaders can be guilty of making "gullible gulls" out of their ward members. Some members become financially or emotionally dependent on their bishops. A dole is a dole whatever its source. All of our Church and family actions should be directed toward making our children and members self-reliant. We can't always control government programs, but we can control our own homes and congregations. If we will teach these principles and live them, we can do much to counter the negative effects which may exist in government programs in any country.

We know there are some who for no reason of their own cannot become self-reliant. President Henry D. Moyle had these people in mind when he said:

"This great principle does not deny to the needy nor to the poor the assistance they should have. The wholly incapacitated, the aged, the sickly are cared for with all tenderness, but every able-bodied person is enjoined to do his utmost for himself to avoid dependence, if his own efforts can make such a course possible; to look upon adversity as temporary; to combine his faith in his own ability with honest toil; to rehabilitate himself and his family to a position of independence; in every case to minimize the need for help and to supplement any help given with his own best efforts.

"We believe [that] seldom [do circumstances arise in which] men of rigorous faith, genuine courage, and unfaltering determination, with the love of independence burning in their hearts, and pride in their own accomplishments, cannot surmount the obstacles that lie in their paths.

"We know that through humble, prayerful, industrious, God-fearing lives, a faith can be developed within us by the strength of which we can [CR, 134] call down the blessings of a kind and merciful Heavenly Father and literally see our handicaps vanish and our independence and freedom established and maintained." (In Conference Report, Apr. 1948, p. 5.)
 

Welfare program is spiritual
Self-reliance is not the end, but a means to an end. It is very possible for a person to be completely independent and lack every other desirable attribute. One may become wealthy and never have to ask anyone for anything, but unless there is some spiritual goal attached to this independence, it can canker his soul.

The welfare program is spiritual. In 1936, when the program was introduced, President David O. McKay made this astute observation:

"The development of our spiritual nature should concern us most. Spirituality is the highest acquisition of the soul, the divine in man; 'the supreme, crowning gift that makes him king of all created things.' It is the consciousness of victory over self and of communion with the infinite. It is spirituality alone which really gives one the best in life.

"It is something to supply clothing to the scantily clad, to furnish [Ensign, 93] ample food to those whose table is thinly spread, to give activity to those who are fighting desperately the despair that comes from enforced idleness, but after all is said and done, the greatest blessings that will accrue from the Church [welfare program] are spiritual. Outwardly, every act seems to be directed toward the physical: re-making of dresses and suits of clothes, canning fruits and vegetables, storing foodstuffs, choosing of fertile fields for settlement--all seem strictly temporal, but permeating all these acts, inspiring and sanctifying them, is the element of spirituality." (In Conference Report, Oct. 1936, p. 103.)
 

Seek the kingdom of God
In the Doctrine and Covenants we read:

"Wherefore, verily I say unto you that all things unto me are spiritual, and not at any time have I given unto you a law which was temporal; neither any man, nor the children of men; neither Adam, your father, whom I created. (Marion G. Romney, in Conference Report, Oct. 1982, 134; or Ensign, Nov. 1982, 93)

"Behold, I gave unto him that he should be an agent unto himself; and I gave unto him commandment, but no temporal commandment gave I unto him, for my commandments are spiritual." (D&C 29:34­35.)

This scripture tells us there is no such thing as a temporal commandment. It also tells us that man is to be "an agent unto himself." Man cannot be an agent unto himself if he is not self-reliant. Herein we see that independence and self-reliance are critical keys to our spiritual growth. Whenever we get into a situation which threatens our self-reliance, we will find our freedom threatened as well. If we increase our dependence, we will find an immediate decrease in our freedom to act.

Thus far, we should have learned that self-reliance is a prerequisite to the complete freedom to act. We have also learned, however, that there is nothing spiritual in self-reliance unless we make the right choices with that freedom. What then should we do once we have become self-reliant in order to grow spiritually?

The key to making self-reliance spiritual is in using the freedom to comply with God's commandments. The scriptures are very clear in their command that it is the duty of those who have to give to those who are in need.

Jacob, speaking to the people of Nephi, said:

"Think of your brethren like unto yourselves, and be familiar with all and free with your substance, that [CR, 135] they may be rich like unto you.

"But before ye seek for riches, seek ye for the kingdom of God.

"And after ye have obtained a hope in Christ ye shall obtain riches, if ye seek them; and ye will seek them for the intent to do good--to clothe the naked, and to feed the hungry, and to liberate the captive, and administer relief to the sick and the afflicted." (Jacob 2:17­19.)
 

Service is exalted life
In our own dispensation, when the Church was only nine months old, the Lord said:

"And for your salvation I give unto you a commandment, for I have heard your prayers, and the poor have complained before me, and the rich have I made, and all flesh is mine, and I am no respecter of persons" (D&C 38:16).

This revelation was given on the second day of January 1831. The next month, in another revelation, the Lord said:

"If thou lovest me thou shalt serve me and keep all my commandments.

"And behold, thou wilt remember the poor, and consecrate of thy properties for their support." (D&C 42:29­30.)

The same month, the Lord referred to this subject again. Evidently the Brethren had been a little remiss. They had not moved fast enough.

"Behold, I say unto you, that ye must visit the poor and the needy and administer to their relief" (D&C 44:6).

The scriptures are full of commandments regarding our obligation to care for the poor; therefore, I will not elaborate further. It has always seemed somewhat paradoxical to me that we must constantly have the Lord command us to do those things which are for our own good. The Lord has said,

"He that findeth his life shall lose it: and he that loseth his life for my sake shall find it" (Matthew 10:39).

We lose our life by serving and lifting others. By so doing we experience the only true and lasting happiness. Service is not something we endure on this earth so we can earn the right to live in the celestial kingdom. Service is the very fiber of which an exalted life in the celestial kingdom is made.

Knowing that service is what gives our Father in Heaven fulfillment, and knowing that we want to be where He is and as He is, why must we be commanded to serve one another? Oh, for the glorious day when these things all come naturally because of the purity of our hearts. In that day there will be no need for a commandment because we will have experienced for ourselves that we are truly happy only when we are engaged in unselfish service. Let us use the freedom which comes from self-reliance in giving and serving.
 

Giving sanctifies
Can we see how critical self-reliance becomes when looked upon as the prerequisite to service, when we also know service is what Godhood is all about? Without self-reliance one cannot exercise these innate desires to serve. How can we give if there is nothing there? Food for the hungry cannot come from empty shelves. Money to assist the needy cannot come from an empty purse. Support and understanding cannot come from the emotionally starved. Teaching cannot come from the unlearned. And most important of all, spiritual guidance cannot come from the spiritually weak.

There is an interdependence between those who have and those who have not. The process of giving exalts the poor and humbles the rich. In the process, both are sanctified. [CR, 136] The poor, released from the bondage and limitations of poverty, are enabled as free men to rise to their full potential, both temporally and spiritually. The rich, by imparting of their surplus, participate in the eternal principle of giving. Once a person has been made whole or self-reliant, he reaches out to aid others, and the cycle repeats itself.

We are all self-reliant in some areas and dependent in others. Therefore, each of us should strive to help others in areas where we have strengths. At the same time, pride should not prevent us from graciously accepting the helping hand of another when we have a real need. To do so denies another person the opportunity to participate in a sanctifying experience.

Again, I say the principle of self-reliance is spiritual, as are all the principles of the welfare program. This is not a doomsday program, but a program for today. One of the three areas of emphasis recently outlined in the statement on the mission of the Church is to perfect the Saints, and this is the purpose of the welfare program. Today is the time for us to perfect our lives. May we continue to hold fast to these truths, I pray, in the name of Jesus Christ, amen.

Our spirit has an innate desire to serve, service comes from being self-reliant

PEF is spiritually motivated, the poor come out of poverty with an education to become strength in the kingdom of God, and they can now help the work move forward.

It does little good to speak of spiritual things to one whose children are dying from hunger. While counseling those who would welcome the survivors of the Willie and Martin handcart companies to the Salt Lake Valley, Brigham Young said: "You know that I would give more for a dish of pudding and milk, or a baked potato and salt, were I in the situation of those persons who have just come in, than I would for all your prayers, though you were to stay here all the afternoon and pray. Prayer is good, but when baked potatoes and pudding and milk are needed, prayer will not supply their place." (Deseret News Weekly, 6 [December 10, 1856]: 320.)

 

"I want to say to you," said President Harold B. Lee, "that we might just as well throw our hats in the air and scream as to hope to convert spiritually an individual family or an individual man or an individual nation whose existence has been reduced to the instincts of animal survival. . . . We must take care of their material needs and give them a taste of the kind of salvation that they do not have to die to get before we can lift their thinking to a higher plane." (General Welfare Meeting, April 4, 1959.)

 

In other words, needy people may require material assistance as a prerequisite to teaching them the higher spiritual truths. The spiritual and temporal parts of our existence cannot be separated.

 

(Alexander B. Morrison, Visions of Zion [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1993], 100 - 101.)

The Lord uses temporal wealth to help build up His kingdom.  We need to be self sufficient in both areas.  Brigham Young wanted to be self sufficient FROM the world (Babylon).

                               

The Last Decade of Brigham Young

July 29, 2004

 

The Salt Lake Endowment House was built in 1855 and was torn down in 1889.  It was used ONLY for LIVING ordinances, there was not a baptismal font or any work for the dead.

Endowment Houses

 

An Endowment house is a building or place where certain temple ordinances may be administered, outside of the temple itself. Moses erected a tabernacle in the wilderness as a "temporary temple"; by analogy, so did the Prophet Joseph Smith. Before the Nauvoo Temple was completed, the large upper room of Joseph Smith's red-brick store building in Nauvoo, Illinois, was used to confer the first temple ordinances on a few leaders of the Church on May 4, 1842, and then on their wives. These ordinances, called endowments, consisted of a course of instruction and rites that included prayers, washings, anointings, and the making of covenants with the Lord Jesus Christ.

 

The Latter-day Saints occasionally used a mountaintop as their temporary temple, and President Brigham Young dedicated Ensign Peak, a hill just north of Salt Lake City, Utah, as a "natural temple." Though Brigham Young designated a temple site in Salt Lake Valley on July 28, 1847, just four days after his arrival, the temple took forty years to build. In the meantime, the upper floor of the Council House, Salt Lake City's first public building, served 2,222 members of the Church as their Endowment house between February 21, 1851, and May 5, 1855.

 

A more permanent Endowment house, designed by Truman O. Angell, Church architect, was soon built on the northwest corner of Temple Square. Brigham Young named it "The House of the Lord." It was dedicated on May 5, 1855, by Heber C. Kimball. The main structure was a two-story building 34 feet by 44 feet, with small one-story extensions on both ends. The first floor had a room for washing and anointing, and also "garden," "world," and "terrestrial" rooms. The upper floor was the "celestial room," with an adjacent sealing room.

 

On the average, 25 to 30 endowments were given daily, for a total of 54,170 in the thirty-four years it was used. And an average of 2,500 marriages were also performed annually. In addition, the Endowment house served as a place for special prayer circles and the setting apart and instruction of newly called missionaries.

 

As the Salt Lake Temple neared completion, the Endowment house was torn down in November 1889. The Salt Lake Temple was dedicated April 6, 1893. A long-anticipated holy place for temple ordinances was then permanently established in Salt Lake City.

 

 

(Encyclopedia of Mormonism, 1-4 vols., edited by Daniel H. Ludlow (New York: Macmillan, 1992), 4564.)

A temple is a link between the 2 worlds, here on earth and the spirit world.  Temple work is done on both sides of the veil.

It was a great event when the St. George temple was completed and dedicated.  The story of Wilford Woodruff and the Founding Fathers:

When I became President of the Twelve and Spencer W. Kimball became President of the Church, we met, just the two of us, every week after our Thursday meetings in the temple, just to be sure that things were properly coordinated between the Twelve and the First Presidency. After one of those first meetings, we talked about the many sacred documents in some of the older temples. St. George was mentioned in particular because St. George is our oldest temple in Utah. I had a stake conference down there about that time, and it was agreed that I would go into the archives-the walk-in vault-of that great temple and review the sacred documents that were there. We were planning for the remodeling and renovating of the St. George Temple and thought that the records might possibly be moved to Salt Lake for safekeeping. And there in the St. George Temple I saw what I had always hoped and prayed that someday I would see. Ever since I returned as a humble missionary and first learned that the Founding Fathers had appeared in that temple, I wanted to see the record. And I saw the record. They did appear to Wilford Woodruff twice and asked why the work hadn't been done for them. They had founded this country and the Constitution of this land, and they had been true to those principles. Later the work was done for them.

 

  In the archives of the temple, I saw in a book, in bold handwriting, the names of the Founding Fathers and others, including Columbus and other great Americans, for whom the work had been done in the house of the Lord. This is all one great program on both sides of the veil. We are fortunate to be engaged in it on this side of the veil. I think the Lord expects us to take an active part in preserving the Constitution and our freedom. (Sandy, Utah, 30 December 1978.)

 

 The Founding Fathers of this nation, those great men, appeared within those sacred walls of the St. George Temple and had their vicarious work done for them. President Wilford Woodruff spoke of it in these words: "Before I left St. George, the spirits of the dead gathered around me, wanting to know why we did not redeem them. Said they, 'You have had the use of the Endowment House for a number of years, and yet nothing has ever been done for us. We laid the foundation of the government you now enjoy, and we never apostatized from it, but we remained true to it and were faithful to God.'"

 

 After he became President of the Church, President Wilford Woodruff declared that "those men who laid the foundation of this American government were the best spirits the God of heaven could find on the face of the earth. They were choice spirits [and] were inspired of the Lord." (CR April 1898, p. 89.) (CR October 1987, Ensign 17 [November 1987]: 6.)

 

 The temple work for the fifty-six signers of the Declaration of Independence and other Founding Fathers has been done. All these appeared to Wilford Woodruff when he was president of the St. George Temple. President George Washington was ordained a high priest at that time. You will also be interested to know that, according to Wilford Woodruff's journal, John Wesley, Benjamin Franklin, and Christopher Columbus were also ordained high priests at that time. When one casts doubt about the character of these noble sons of God, I believe he or she will have to answer to the God of heaven for it. Yes, with Lincoln I say: "To add brightness to the sun or glory to the name of Washington is . . . impossible. Let none attempt it. In solemn awe pronounce the name and in its deathless splendor, leave it shining on." (This Nation Shall Endure, p. 18.)

 

The restoration of the gospel and the establishment of the Lord's Church could not come to pass until the Founding Fathers were raised up and completed their foreordained missions. Those great souls who were responsible for the freedoms we enjoy acknowledged the guiding hand of Providence. For their efforts we are indebted, but we are even more indebted to our Father in Heaven and to His Son, Jesus Christ. How fortunate we are to live when the blessings of liberty and the gospel of Jesus Christ are both available to us. (Bicentennial Ball, Salt Lake City, Utah, 18 September 1987.)

 

 

(Ezra Taft Benson, The Teachings of Ezra Taft Benson [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1988], 603.)

Ministry of Joseph was to restore the gospel, priesthood, keys, and ordinances.

Ministry of Brigham was to organize, the Church today comes from Brigham, and it isn’t the same structure as in Nauvoo.  He established auxiliaries, reorganized the priesthood, and spread the work in new settlements and sending missionaries worldwide.

James B. Allen “Story of the Latter Day Saints”, chapter Close of a Career

Panic of 1873 – D&C 78:14 – Brigham Young wanted the saints to be independent from the U.S. and the world, the saints were too dependant on goods from the eastern U.S.

The United Orders of Zion

 

During the last five years of his life, President Brigham Young continued to fight the influences of outside competition that seemed to threaten the economic independence and solidarity of the Saints. The railroad had made possible a mining boom, and inevitably the territory was becoming dependent upon the prosperity of the mining industry. In addition, the railroad brought to Utah consumer goods that could often be sold less expensively than those produced in the territory. This was the situation when the United States was suddenly hit by the famous Panic of 1873. The financial failure of Jay Cooke and Company caused many depositors to lose confidence in the nation's banks and begin to withdraw their funds. Bank failures quickly multiplied, the circulation of money slowed, movements of some agricultural products were halted, credit declined, people hoarded cash, consumer spending dropped, unemployment rose, and the panic was on. In Utah, bank deposits dropped by more than 30 percent in a year; the mines closed, causing a decline in retail business; shops, factories, the agricultural market, and two major banks failed. Despite their efforts at independence, the Saints in Zion were clearly affected by the economic rhythm of the nation.

 

This was proof enough to many Latter-day Saints that they were still too entangled in economic alliances with the world. Church leaders tried to soften the effects of the panic by reemphasizing home industry and reaffirming their teachings on unity and brotherly love. They also began to instruct the Saints in the United Order of Enoch.

 

The move into the United Order was not sudden, for it had found expression in the cooperative movement of the late 1860s. "This cooperative movement," President Young declared in 1869, "is only a stepping stone to what is called the Order of Enoch, but which is in reality the order of Heaven." fn The next step, the actual establishment of United Orders throughout the territory, was inspired in part by the impressive success of the Brigham City Cooperative, which had weathered the disastrous Panic of 1873. Lorenzo Snow had founded a cooperative mercantile establishment in 1864, and it soon branched out into some forty cooperative departments. Brooms, hats, molasses, furniture, a general store, a tannery, a woolen mill, sheep, milk cows, hogs, flax, all phases of the building trades, and specialized farms were all part of the Brigham City Cooperative. It was owned by approximately four hundred shareholders who represented nearly every family in this village of two thousand, and the profits from its activity were paid to shareholders in kind (goods and services) rather than cash. The panic left the cooperative almost untouched, and the reputation of Brigham City spread as far as England and impressed social reformers everywhere. It was reported later that Brigham Young had said that "Brother Snow has led the people along, and got them into the United Order without their knowing it." fn

 

(James B. Allen and Glen M. Leonard, The Story of the Latter-day Saints, 2nd ed., rev. and enl. [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1992], 365 - 366.)

We need to be independent ourselves, jobs, debt, education, food storage, setting up a Zion society.

When Brigham Young took his annual winter trip to southern Utah in the winter of 1873-74, he began to preach the need for improving community economic efforts. He envisioned a society in which the people would make and raise all they needed to eat, drink, or wear, and still realize a surplus for sale to outsiders. Such a dream was, of course, idealistic, and no one knew better than Brigham Young that a true Zion never would be created in this world until the people overcame every vestige of selfishness and were prepared for the millennial reign of Christ. But the ideal was worth striving for, and the economic problems of the territory provided the impetus for bold new efforts.

 

The new program had both spiritual and economic ramifications, and it is significant that it should emerge at the same time that various economic reform measures were attracting attention throughout the nation. The newly industrialized American society had recorded some incredible achievements, but it had also created economic inequality, poverty, and lack of opportunity for many rural and urban workers alike. As a result, political reformers were beginning to advocate stricter government controls to ensure a more even distribution of America's new wealth. The Latter-day Saints clearly opposed the idea, advocated by some reformers, of a socialist state in which all means of production and distribution would be owned outright by the government. The same problems that concerned the reformers, however, made the Saints willing to try to establish communities based on cooperation and equality, grounded in the religious belief that the earth's abundance belonged to God and that in building their ideal communities they were furthering the cause of the kingdom of God on earth. Consisting of cooperative enterprise based on individual, voluntary association, their communities would exist side-by-side with the larger society and would engage in trade with it, but they would also be economically self-sufficient and not dependent upon the outside in times of emergency.

 

The settlement at St. George was particularly in need of an economic boost in the winter of 1873-74, and it was there that Brigham Young organized the first United Order. Nearly three hundred people, most of the adults in the city, pledged their time, energy, ability, and economic (i.e., income-producing) property to the order and became subject to the direction of an elected board of management. In return for property, each person received a commensurate amount of stock. Stockholders pledged themselves to boost local manufacturing, stop importing goods, and trade only with members of the order. The whole community constituted a single economic enterprise that operated various agricultural and business activities, including the nearby Washington cotton factory. Members received wages and dividends depending upon the amount of labor and property contributed. The order was also to be a spiritual union, and a long list of rules for Christian living was drawn up. Each person entered the order by being rebaptized and pledging to obey all the rules.

 

That winter Brigham Young established the order in about twenty communities in southern Utah, and as he traveled back to Salt Lake City the following spring he organized each settlement along his way. In all, about 150 United Orders were established, and most of them adopted constitutions similar to the pioneer model at St. George.

 

In addition to promoting the self-sufficiency of the kingdom, an equally fundamental reason given for establishing the new system was to protect the Church from the internal schism that could be caused by the development of separate wealthy and poor classes among the Saints. In a pamphlet published in 1875 the First Presidency decried class distinctions and labeled them as a primary reason behind the original cooperative movement:

 

Years ago it was perceived that . . . a wealthy class was being rapidly formed in our midst whose interests, in the course of time, were likely to be diverse from those of the rest of the community. The growth of such a class was dangerous to our union; and most of all people, we stand in need of union and to have our interests identical. Then it was that the Saints were counseled to enter into co-operation. fn

 

Brigham Young realized that the United Order must be flexible enough to accommodate a variety of community needs as well as a variety of Saints. Some people, for example, simply were less willing than others to enter into the most "advanced" cooperative activity. As a result, the term United Order was defined loosely enough that it could apply to various kinds of associations throughout the LDS commonwealth.

 

St. George represented one of four general types of United Orders, and most orders of this type lasted little more than a year, however. As might be expected, problems arose regarding fair distribution of benefits. As a result, many decided that they were not ready to live the plan. The St. George order itself was dissolved in 1878.

 

 

(James B. Allen and Glen M. Leonard, The Story of the Latter-day Saints, 2nd ed., rev. and enl. [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1992], 367.)

The Order of Enoch is a millennial life, one that prepares us to live with Christ in the presence of our Heavenly parents.  There is an absence of the natural man, no selfishness will exist.

The highest degree of the Celestial kingdom will be the only place where unselfishness will exist, devotion to the family of God, church of the 1st born; our concern is only for the family. All other kingdoms will have a degree of selfishness in them.

Class distinction would destroy the movement after Brigham’s death.

 

Presidency of John Taylor

Call to the 12 of Heber J. Grant

August 5, 2004

 

Brigham Young realigned the 12 before he died.  Basis of seniority, John Taylor, Wilford Woodruff were placed ahead of Orson Hyde and Orson Pratt.

At a meeting of the Twelve Apostles held in 1875, Brigham Young made a decision affecting Hyde's standing as the senior member of the Quorum. It was ruled that since he and Orson Pratt had briefly separated themselves from the Quorum in 1838 and 1842, respectively, they should lose their seniority to Elders John Taylor, Wilford Woodruff, and George A. Smith, who had been ordained during their time away (Durham, Succession in the Church [Salt Lake City, 1970], pp. 73-76). Because of that decision, John Taylor rather than Orson Hyde succeeded Brigham Young as President of the Church.

(Encyclopedia of Mormonism, 1-4 vols., edited by Daniel H. Ludlow (New York: Macmillan, 1992), 666.)

A major restructuring of Church organization was begun in 1877 by Brigham Young. He declared that all stakes were equal and autonomous and that the Salt Lake Stake held no authority over other stakes. Members of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles were released as stake presidents and several of the largest stakes were divided. Quarterly stake conferences were instituted, to be presided over by a visiting General Authority. Stake presidencies were to be involved in overseeing the wards in their stake and to call local priesthood leaders to be home missionaries. The stake thus became the major governing unit between the wards and Church headquarters. Between 1847 and 1880, twenty-three stakes were organized.

(S. Kent Brown, Donald Q. Cannon, and Richard H. Jackson, eds., Historical Atlas of Mormonism [New York: Simon and Schuster, 1994], 124.)

Intense persecution that the government inflicted upon the church because of living plural marriage, Satan was behind it of course. 

The political pressure helps cleanse the church and help it expand to Mexico, Canada, and into Idaho, the church grew.  Bruce said the revelation of small temples came about because of the colonies in Mexico.  There was confiscation of property of individuals and the church.

John Taylor edited “The Mormon” in NYC; he looked at the double standard of living plural marriage and others living in immorality. 

The outcome brought about a tried and tested people.  Families suffered greatly, yet nothing was done for them when fathers and husbands were put in jail.

 

Plural marriage was the nineteenth-century LDS practice of a man marrying more than one wife. Popularly known as polygamy, it was actually polygany. Although polygamy had been practiced for much of history in many parts of the world, to do so in "enlightened" America in the nineteenth century was viewed by most as incomprehensible and unacceptable, making it the Church's most controversial and least understood practice. Though the principle was lived for a relatively brief period, it had profound impact on LDS self-definition, helping to establish the Latter-day Saints as a "people apart." The practice also caused many nonmembers to distance themselves from the Church and see Latter-day Saints more negatively than would otherwise have been the case.

 

Rumors of plural marriage among the members of the Church in the 1830s and 1840s led to persecution, and the public announcement of the practice after August 29, 1852, in Utah gave enemies a potent weapon to fan public hostility against the Church. Although Latter-day Saints believed that their religiously-based practice of plural marriage was protected by the U.S. Constitution, opponents used it to delay Utah statehood until 1896. Ever harsher antipolygamy legislation stripped Latter-day Saints of their rights as citizens, disincorporated the Church, and permitted the seizure of Church property before the manifesto of 1890 announced the discontinuance of the practice.

 

Plural marriage challenged those within the Church, too. Spiritual descendants of the Puritans and sexually conservative, early participants in plural marriage first wrestled with the prospect and then embraced the principle only after receiving personal spiritual confirmation that they should do so.

 

In 1843, one year before his death, the Prophet Joseph Smith dictated a lengthy revelation on the doctrine of marriage for eternity (D&C 132; see Marriage: Eternal Marriage). This revelation also taught that under certain conditions a man might be authorized to have more than one wife. Though the revelation was first committed to writing on July 12, 1843, considerable evidence suggests that the principle of plural marriage was revealed to Joseph Smith more than a decade before in connection with his study of the Bible (see Joseph Smith Translation of the Bible), probably in early 1831. Passages indicating that revered Patriarchs and prophets of old were polygamists raised questions that prompted the Prophet to inquire of the Lord about marriage in general and about plurality of wives in particular. He then learned that when the Lord commanded it, as he had with the Patriarchs anciently, a man could have more than one living wife at a time and not be condemned for adultery. He also understood that the Church would one day be required to live the law (D&C 132:1-4, 28-40).

 

 

Evidence for the practice of plural marriage during the 1830s is scant. Only a few knew about the still unwritten revelation, and perhaps the only known plural marriage was that between Joseph Smith and Fanny Alger. Nonetheless there were rumors, harbingers of challenges to come.

 

In April 1839, Joseph Smith emerged from six months' imprisonment in Liberty Jail with a sense of urgency about completing his mission (see History of the Church: c. 1831-1844). Since receiving the sealing key from Elijah in the Kirtland Temple (D&C 110:13-16) in April 1836, the Prophet had labored to prepare the Saints for additional teachings and ordinances, including plural marriage.

 

Joseph Smith realized that the introduction of plural marriage would inevitably invite severe criticism. After the Kirtland experience, he knew the tension it would create in his own family; even though Emma, with faith in his prophetic calling, accepted the revelation as being from God and not of his own doing, she could not reconcile herself to the practice. Beyond that, it had the potential to divide the Church and increase hostilities from outside. Still, he felt obligated to move ahead. "The object with me is to obey & teach others to obey God in just what he tells us to do," he taught several months before his death. "It mattereth not whether the principle is popular or unpopular. I will always maintain a true principle even if I Stand alone in it" (TPJS, p. 332).

 

Although certain that God would require it of him and of the Church, Joseph Smith would not have introduced it when he did except for the conviction that God required it then. Several close confidants later said that he proceeded with plural marriage in Nauvoo only after both internal struggle and divine warning. Lorenzo Snow later remembered vividly a conversation in 1843 in which the Prophet described the battle he waged "in overcoming the repugnance of his feelings" regarding plural marriage.

He knew the voice of God-he knew the commandment of the Almighty to him was to go forward-to set the example, and establish Celestial plural marriage. He knew that he had not only his own prejudices and pre-possessions to combat and to overcome, but those of the whole Christian world…; but God…had given the commandment [The Biography and Family Record of Lorenzo Snow, pp. 69-70 (Salt Lake City, 1884)].

 

Even so, Snow and other confidants agreed that Joseph Smith proceeded in Nauvoo only after an angel declared that he must or his calling would be given to another (Bachman, pp. 74-75). After this, Joseph Smith told Brigham Young that he was determined to press ahead though it would cost him his life, for "it is the work of God, and He has revealed this principle, and it is not my business to control or dictate it" (Brigham Young Discourse, Oct. 8, 1866, Church Archives).

 

Nor did others enter into plural marriage blindly or simply because Joseph Smith had spoken, despite biblical precedents. Personal accounts document that most who entered plural marriage in Nauvoo faced a crisis of faith that was resolved only by personal spiritual witness. Those who participated generally did so only after they had obtained reassurance and saw it as religious duty.

 

Even those closest to Joseph Smith were challenged by the revelation. After first learning of plural marriage, Brigham Young said he felt to envy the corpse in a funeral cortege and "could hardly get over it for a long time" (JD 3:266). The Prophet's brother Hyrum Smith stubbornly resisted the very possibility until circumstances forced him to go to the Lord for understanding. Both later taught the principle to others. Emma Smith vacillated, one day railing in opposition against it and the next giving her consent for Joseph to be sealed to another wife (see comments by Orson Pratt, JD 13:194).

 

Teaching new marriage and family arrangements where the principles could not be openly discussed compounded the problems. Those authorized to teach the doctrine stressed the strict covenants, obligations and responsibilities associated with it-the antithesis of license. But those who heard only rumors, or who chose to distort and abuse the teaching, often envisioned and sometimes practiced something quite different. One such was John C. Bennett, mayor of Nauvoo and adviser to Joseph Smith, who twisted the teaching to his own advantage. Capitalizing on rumors and lack of understanding among general Church membership, he taught a doctrine of "spiritual wifery." He and associates sought to have illicit sexual relationships with women by telling them that they were married "spiritually," even if they had never been married formally, and that the Prophet approved the arrangement. The Bennett scandal resulted in his excommunication and the disaffection of several others. Bennett then toured the country speaking against the Latter-day Saints and published a bitter anti-Mormon exposé charging the Saints with licentiousness.

 

The Bennett scandal elicited several public statements aimed at arming the Saints against the abuses. Two years later enemies and dissenters, some of whom had been associated with Bennett, published the Nauvoo Expositor, to expose, among other things, plural marriage, thus setting in motion events leading to Joseph Smith's death (see Martyrdom of Joseph and Hyrum Smith).

 

Far from involving license, however, plural marriage was a carefully regulated and ordered system. Order, mutual agreements, regulation, and covenants were central to the practice. As Elder Parley P. Pratt wrote in 1845,

These holy and sacred ordinances have nothing to do with whoredoms, unlawful connections, confusion or crime; but the very reverse. They have laws, limits, and bounds of the strictest kind, and none but the pure in heart, the strictly virtuous, or those who repent and become such, are worthy to partake of them. And…[a] dreadful weight of condemnation await those who pervert, or abuse them [The Prophet, May 24, 1845; cf. D&C 132:7].

 

The Book of Mormon makes clear that, though the Lord will command men through his prophets to live the law of plural marriage at special times for his purposes, monogamy is the general standard (Jacob 2:28-30); unauthorized polygamy was and is viewed as adultery. Another safeguard was that authorized plural marriages could be performed only through the sealing power controlled by the presiding authority of the Church (D&C 132:19).

 

Once the Saints left Nauvoo, plural marriage was openly practiced. In winter quarters, for example, discussion of the principle was an "open secret" and plural families were acknowledged. As early as 1847, visitors to Utah commented on the practice. Still, few new plural marriages were authorized in Utah before the completion of the Endowment house in Salt Lake City in 1855.

 

With the Saints firmly established in the Great Basin, Brigham Young announced the practice publicly and published the revelation on eternal marriage. Under his direction, on Sunday, August 29, 1852, Elder Orson Pratt publicly discussed and defended the practice of plural marriage in the Church. After examining the biblical precedents (Abraham, Jacob, David, and others), Elder Pratt argued that the Church, as heir of the keys required anciently for plural marriages to be sanctioned by God, was required to perform such marriages as part of the restoration. He offered reasons for the practice and discussed several possible benefits (see JD 1:53-66), a precedent followed later by others. But such discussions were after the fact and not the justification. Latter-day Saints practiced plural marriage because they believed God commanded them to do so.

 

Generally plural marriage involved only two wives and seldom more than three; larger families like those of Brigham Young or Heber C. Kimball were exceptions. Sometimes the wives simply shared homes, each with her own bedroom, or lived in a "duplex" arrangement, each with a mirror-image half of the house. In other cases, husbands established separate homes for their wives, sometimes in separate towns. Although circumstances and the mechanics of family life varied, in general the living style was simply an adaptation of the nineteenth century American family. Polygamous marriages were similar to national norms in fertility and divorce rates as well. Wives of one husband often developed strong bonds of sisterly love; however, strong antipathies could also arise between wives.

 

Faced with a national antipolygamy campaign, LDS women startled their eastern sisters, who equated polygamy with oppression of women, by publicly demonstrating in favor of their right to live plural marriage as a religious principle. Judging from the preaching, women were at least as willing to enter plural marriage as men. Instead of public admonitions urging women to enter plural marriage, one finds many urging worthy men to "do their duty" and undertake to care for a plural wife and additional children. Though some were reluctant to accept such responsibility, many responded and sought another wife. It was not unheard of for a wife to take the lead and insist that her husband take another wife; yet, in other cases, a first marriage dissolved over the husband's insistence on marrying again.

 

As with families generally, some plural families worked better than others. Anecdotal evidence and the healthy children that emerged from many plural households witness that some worked very well. But some plural wives disliked the arrangement. The most common complaint of second and third wives resulted from a husband displaying too little sensitivity to the needs of plural families or not treating them equally. Not infrequently, wives complained that husbands spent too little time with them. But where husbands provided conscientiously even time and wives developed deep love and respect for each other, children grew up as members of large, well-adjusted extended families.

 

Plural marriage helped mold the Church's attitude toward divorce in pioneer Utah. Though Brigham Young disliked divorce and discouraged it, when women sought divorce he generally granted it. He felt that a woman trapped in an unworkable relationship with no alternatives deserved a chance to improve her life. But when a husband sought relief from his familial responsibilities, President Young consistently counseled him to do his duty and not seek divorce from any wife willing to put up with him.

 

Contrary to the caricatures of a hostile world press, plural marriage did not result in offspring of diminished capacity. Normal men and women came from plural households, and their descendants are prominent throughout the Intermountain West. Some observers feel that the added responsibility that fell early upon some children in such households contributed to their exceptional record of achievement. Plural marriage also aided many wives. The flexibility of plural households contributed to the large number of accomplished LDS women who were pioneers in medicine, politics and other public careers. In fact, plural marriage made it possible for wives to have professional careers that would not otherwise have been available to them.

 

The exact percentage of Latter-day Saints who participated in the practice is not known, but studies suggest a maximum of from 20 to 25 of LDS adults were members of polygamous households. At its height, plural marriage probably involved only a third of the women reaching marriageable age-though among Church leadership plural marriage was the norm for a time. Public opposition to polygamy led to the first law against the practice in 1862, and, by the 1880s, laws were increasingly punitive. The Church contested the constitutionality of those laws, but the Supreme Court sustained the legislation (see Reynolds v. United States), leading to a harsh and effective federal antipolygamy campaign known by the Latter-day Saints as "the Raid." Wives and husbands went on the "underground" and hundreds were arrested and sentenced to jail terms in Utah and several federal prisons. This campaign severely affected the families involved, and the related attack on Church organization and properties greatly inhibited its ability to function (see History of the Church: c. 1877-1898). Following a vision showing him that continuing plural marriage endangered the temples and the mission of the Church, not just statehood, President Wilford Woodruff issued the Manifesto in October 1890, announcing an official end to new plural marriages and facilitating an eventual peaceful resolution of the conflict.

 

Earlier polygamous families continued to exist well into the twentieth century, causing further political problems for the Church, and new plural marriages did not entirely cease in 1890. After having lived the principle at some sacrifice for half a century, many devout Latter-day Saints found ending plural marriage a challenge almost as complex as was its beginning in the 1840s. Some new plural marriages were contracted in the 1890s in LDS settlements in Canada and northern Mexico, and a few elsewhere. With national attention again focused on the practice in the early 1900s during the House hearings on Representative-elect B. H. Roberts and Senate hearings on Senator-elect Reed Smoot (see Smoot Hearings), President Joseph F. Smith issued his "Second Manifesto" in 1904. Since that time, it has been uniform Church policy to excommunicate any member either practicing or openly advocating the practice of polygamy. Those who do so today, principally members of fundamentalist groups, do so outside the Church.

 

(Encyclopedia of Mormonism, 1-4 vols., edited by Daniel H. Ludlow (New York: Macmillan, 1992), 1091.)

Manifesto of 1890

 

The Manifesto of 1890 was a proclamation by President Wilford Woodruff that the Church had discontinued plural marriage. It ended a decade of persecution and hardship in which Latter-day Saints tenaciously resisted what they saw as unconstitutional federal attempts to curb polygamy. While the Manifesto is often referred to as a revelation, the declaration was actually a press release that followed President Woodruff's revelatory experiences. In this respect, the Manifesto is similar to Doctrine and Covenants official declaration-2.

 

Following the passage of the Edmunds-Tucker Act in 1887, the Church found it difficult to operate as a viable institution (see Antipolygamy Legislation). Among other things, this legislation disincorporated the Church, confiscated its properties, and even threatened seizure of its temples. After visiting with priesthood leaders in many settlements, President Woodruff left for San Francisco on September 3, 1890, to meet with prominent businessmen and politicians. He returned to Salt Lake City on September 21, determined to obtain divine confirmation to pursue a course that seemed to be agonizingly more and more clear. As he explained to Church members a year later, the choice was between, on the one hand, continuing to practice plural marriage and thereby losing the temples, "stopping all the ordinances therein," and, on the other, ceasing plural marriage in order to continue performing the essential ordinances for the living and the dead. President Woodruff hastened to add that he had acted only as the Lord directed: "I should have let all the temples go out of our hands; I should have gone to prison myself, and let every other man go there, had not the God of heaven commanded me to do what I do; and when the hour came that I was commanded to do that, it was all clear to me" (see Appendix; "Excerpts" accompanying Official Declaration-1).

 

The final element in President Woodruff's revelatory experience came on the evening of September 23, 1890. The following morning, he reported to some of the General Authorities that he had struggled throughout the night with the Lord regarding the path that should be pursued. "Here is the result," he said, placing a 510-word handwritten manuscript on the table. The document was later edited by George Q. Cannon of the First Presidency and others to its present 356 words. On October 6, 1890, it was presented to the Latter-day Saints at the General Conference and approved.

 

While nearly all Church leaders in 1890 regarded the Manifesto as inspired, there were differences among them about its scope and permanence. Some leaders were understandably reluctant to terminate a long-standing practice that was regarded as divinely mandated. As a result, a limited number of plural marriages were performed over the next several years. Not surprisingly, rumors of such marriages soon surfaced, and beginning in January 1904, testimony given in the Smoot hearings made it clear that plural marriage had not been completely extinguished. The ambiguity was ended in the General Conference of April 1904, when the First Presidency issued the "second manifesto," an emphatic declaration that prohibited plural marriage and proclaimed that offenders would be subject to Church discipline, including excommunication.

 

The Manifesto of 1890 should be regarded as a pivotal event in the history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and of the state of Utah. Not only did it mark the beginning of the end of the official practice of plural marriage, but it also heralded a new age as Latter-day Saints relinquished the isolationist practices of the past and commenced a period of greater accommodation and integration into the fabric of American society (see Utah Statehood).

 

Bibliography

 

Alexander, Thomas G. Mormonism in Transition, pp. 3-15. Urbana, Ill., 1986.

Gibbons, Francis M. Wilford Woodruff, pp. 353-61. Salt Lake City, 1988.

PAUL H. PETERSON

 

(Encyclopedia of Mormonism, 1-4 vols., edited by Daniel H. Ludlow (New York: Macmillan, 1992), 852.)

 

The visit in Iona by Wilford Woodruff and Heber J. Grant and the “Wagon box Prophesy

Vision, Faith and Work: From Wagonbox to University”

 

Brigham Young University-Idaho Devotional

January 20, 2004

Michael R. Orme

 

In 1884 a small group of courageous Latter-day Saints had ventured forth from the comparatively mild, hospitable, and civilized climate of the Territory of Utah to settle the bleak sagebrush plains of the Upper Snake River Valley in the territory of Idaho. It was a daunting and formidable task. Throughout the course of the nineteenth century, a variety of adventurous explorers, rough-hewn mountain men and thousands of intrepid pioneers traveling to the Oregon Country had traversed the Snake River plain, but very few had elected to stay. The reasons for their disdain for this country were abundantly clear to any observer: the land was treeless, characterized mostly by sagebrush and lava rock and suffered from unrelenting wind, persistent cold, and little rainfall. In sum, it was your basic barren, high mountain desert. Early explorers, like Captain Bonneville, described it as a “vast uninhabited solitude that must forever defy cultivation.”

 

These hardy Mormon pioneers had created homesteads in the Iona area, a small village located just north of Idaho Falls. However, the pioneers quickly became discouraged as their crops were wiped out by numerous killing frosts during the all too short growing season.

 

I have to digress at this point in the story to tell you a little about how really cold it can get in Southeast Idaho. I know a little about these frequent frosts and chilling winds because, when I was growing up in Idaho Falls, I saw it snow every month of the year but July. Moreover, I am descended of Mormon Pioneers who, after surviving the early winter snows of Wyoming with the ill-fated Martin Handcart Company in 1856, ultimately settled east of Ashton, Idaho near the slopes of the Tetons in an area known as Squirrel Meadows. They had a saying about Squirrel that can be appreciated by those of you who have survived a hard Rexburg winter, which went something like this: “Squirrel only has two seasons: ten months of winter and eight weeks of tough sledding.”

 

It was into the midst of these discouraged members that Wilford Woodruff and Heber J. Grant came to address the first formal Church meeting held in the Iona area on 17 June 1884. This meeting was only attended by some nine to ten adults and a few children. Significantly, one of the adults in attendance was Thomas Ricks, whose name would figure prominently not only in the history of the area, but also in the establishment of a small, Church academy at “Mosquito Bend,” now known as Rexburg. This institution, while bearing his name, would become the largest private junior college in the United States and is now a four year university—Brigham Young University-Idaho. As these Saints had no chapel, the meeting was held outside and the tailgate of a wagonbox served as the pulpit. Pulling himself onto the wagon and looking down on this small fellowship of Saints struggling to survive in a harsh and unforgiving environment, Apostle Woodruff was blessed with a remarkable vision of the future of the valley and announced the following marvelous prophecy:

 

 

 

 

 

The Spirit of the Lord rests mightily upon me and I feel to bless you in the name of Jesus Christ. I promise you that the climate will be moderated for your good. I can see these great sagebrush prairies, as far as the eye can reach, turned into fertile fields. I bless the land that it shall yield forth in its strength. Flowers and trees and fine homes shall grace this great valley from one end to the other. Schools and colleges of higher learning shall be built to serve you that you may learn the mysteries of God’s great universe. I see churches and meetinghouses dotting the landscape, where the God of Israel may be worshiped in spirit and in truth. Yes, and as I look into the future of this great valley I can see temples—I can see beautiful temples erected to the name of the living God where holy labors may be carried on in his name through generations to come.

 

BIBLE DICTIONARY
LEVIRATE MARRIAGE

The custom of a widow marrying her deceased husband’s brother or sometimes a near heir. The word has nothing to do with the name Levi or the biblical Levites, but is so called because of the Latin levir, meaning husband’s brother, connected with the English suffix ate, thus constituting levirate. This system of marriage is designated in Deut. 25: 5-10 (cf. Gen. 38: 8), is spoken of in Matt. 22: 23 ff.; it also forms a major aspect of the story of Ruth (Ruth 4: 1-12).

President Grant’s October 1942 Conference address:

President Heber J. Grant

 

I am grateful beyond my power of expression for the faith and prayers of the people and for the blessings of the Lord in my behalf. For two and one-half years I have been gaining a little since I became ill. I have been home since that illness overtook me a little longer than two years, and when people have asked me how I am, I have said, "Better than I was yesterday," and this is really true—I have been gaining a little all the time. To begin with I could not move my left leg or my left arm. The doctors said it was not a paralytic stroke, but it must have been at least a second cousin to it. I could walk upstairs only one step at a time and drag my left leg up. Now, I can walk up and down stairs. I can walk across the floor without scraping my foot on the carpet; I can throw my left leg over my right one with perfect ease, and back again; my improvement is very remarkable considering the condition I was in, and I attribute it to the prayers of the Saints in my behalf. I am grateful to them beyond expression and I am grateful to the doctors who have so very kindly taken care of me in California and here at home. I am truly appreciative of the interest they have taken in my behalf. I feel almost normal.

 

I have decided to tell in detail one or two very remarkable things that have happened in my life.

 

I was made one of the apostles in October, 1882. On the 6th of October, 1882, I met Brother George Teasdale at the south gate of the temple. His face lit up, and he said: "Brother Grant, you and I"—very enthusiastically—and then he commenced

coughing and choking, and went on into meeting and did not finish his sentence. It came to me as plainly as though he had said the words: "Are going to be chosen this afternoon to fill the vacancies in the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles."

 

I went to the meeting and my head swelled, and I thought to myself, "Well, I am going to be one of the apostles," and I was willing to vote for myself, but the conference adjourned without anyone being chosen.

 

Ten days later I received a telegram saying, "You must be in Salt Lake tomorrow without fail." I was then president of Tooele Stake. The telegram came from my partner, Nephi W. Clayton. When I got to the depot, I said: "Nephi, why on earth are you calling me back here? I had an appointment out in Tooele Stake."

 

"Never mind," he said; "it was not I who sent for you; it was Brother Lyman. He told me to send the telegram and sign my name to it. He told me to come and meet you and take you to the President's office. That is all I know."

 

 I went to the President's office, and there sat Brother Teasdale, and all of the ten Apostles, and the Presidency of the Church, and also Seymour B. Young and the members of the Seven Presidents of the Seventies. And the revelation was read calling Brother Teasdale and myself to the apostleship and Brother Seymour B. Young to be one of the Seven Presidents of the Seventies.

 

Brother Teasdale was blessed by President John Taylor, and George Q. Cannon blessed me.

 

After the meeting I said to Brother Teasdale, "I know what you were going to say to me on the sixth of October when you happened to choke half to death and then went into the meeting."

 

He said, "Oh, no, you don't."

 

"Yes, I do," and I repeated it: "You and I are going to be called to the apostleship."

He said, "Well, that is what I was going to say, and then it occurred to me that I had no right to tell it, that I had received a manifestation from the Lord." He said, "Heber, I have suffered the tortures of the damned for ten days, thinking I could not tell the difference between a manifestation from the Lord and one from the devil, that the devil had deceived me."

 

I said, "I have not suffered like that, but I never prayed so hard in my life for anything as I did that the Lord would forgive me for the egotism of thinking that I was fit to be an apostle, and that I was ready to go into that meeting ten days ago and vote for myself to be an apostle."

 

I was a very unhappy man from October until February. For the next four months whenever I would bear my testimony of the divinity of the Savior, there seemed to be a voice that would say: "You lie, because you have never seen Him." One of the brethren had made the remark that unless a man had seen the Lamb of God—that was his expression—he was not fit to be an apostle. This feeling that I have mentioned would follow me. I would wake up in the night with the impression: "You do not know that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, because you have never seen Him," and the same feeling would come to me when I would preach and bear testimony. It worried me from October until the following February.

 

I was in Arizona in February, traveling with Brigham Young, Jr., and a number of other brethren, visiting the Navajo Indians and the Moki Indians. Several of our party were riding in "White Tops" and several on horseback. I was in the rear of the party with Brother Lot Smith. He was on a big fine iron-grey horse, and I was on a small mule that I had discovered was the easiest and best riding animal I had ever straddled.

 

We were going due east when the road changed and went almost north, but there was a trail ahead of us, and I said, "Hold on, Lot; stop."

 

I said, "Brother Smith, where does this trail lead?"

 

He said, "It leads to a great gully just a short distance away, and no team can possibly travel over it. We have to make a regular mule shoe of a ride to get to the other side of the gully'"

 

I said, "Is there any danger from Indians if a man were alone over there?" "None at all."

 

I said: "I visited the spot yesterday where George A. Smith, Jr., was killed by a Navajo Indian, who asked him for his pistol and then shot him with it, and I feel a little nervous, but if there is no danger I want to be all alone, so you go on with the party and I will take that trail."

 

I had this feeling that I ought not to testify any more about the Savior and that, really, I was not fit to be an apostle. It seemed overwhelming to me that I should be one. There was a spirit that said: "If you have not seen the Savior, why don't you resign your position?"

 

As I rode along alone, I seemed to see a council in heaven. The Savior was there; the Prophet Joseph was there; my father and others that I knew were there. In this council it seemed that they decided that a mistake had been made in not filling the vacancies in the Quorum of the Twelve, and conference had adjourned. The chances were the Brethren would wait another six months, and the way to remedy the situation was to send a revelation naming the men who should fill the vacancies. In this council the Prophet said, "I want to be represented by one of my own in that Council."

 

A little while before this I had attended the funeral of Brother Snedeker, a counselor in the bishopric of Mill Creek Ward, and Brother Joseph E. Taylor spoke at the services. In his remarks he became very pathetic to think that the Prophet had given his life for the Cause and that he had no representative in the quorums of the Priesthood of the Church. He was followed by Brother Joseph F. Smith, and Brother Smith said: "'We believe the Bible to be the word of God as far as it is translated correctly,' and I believe it is translated correctly when it says that if a man die his brother shall marry his widow and raise up seed to the dead man, and I need to take only two steps from where I am standing now to place my hand on the shoulder of a man who is one of the Twelve Apostles of the Church, who is a son of the Prophet Joseph," and he pointed directly at me.

 

It made a very profound impression upon me, and I wondered if I should tell the people about it. I had always understood and known that my mother was sealed to the Prophet, and that Brigham Young had told my father that he would not marry my mother to him for eternity, because he had instructions from the Prophet that if anything happened to him before he was married to Rachel Ivins she must be sealed to him for eternity, that she belonged to him.

 

That is the reason that Father spoke up in this council to which I have referred, and said: "Why not choose the boy who bears my name, who belongs to you, to be one of the apostles?" That inspiration was given to me.

 

I can truthfully say that from February, 1883, until today I have never had any of that trouble, and I Can bear my testimony that I know that God lives, that Jesus is the Christ, the Savior of the world and that Joseph Smith is a l prophet of the living God; and the evil one does not try to persuade me that I do not know what I am talking about. I have never had one slight impression to the contrary. I have just had real, genuine joy and satisfaction in proclaiming the gospel and bearing my testimony of the divinity of Jesus Christ, and the divine calling of Joseph Smith, the prophet.

 

Now, brethren, I could go on dictating by the hour, there are so many things that have happened in my life that I would like to tell you.

 

I once more thank the Saints for their faith and for their prayers, and for the strength that I have today in comparison with two and one-half years ago.

 

May God's blessings be and abide with you, one and all, and all the Saints and all the honest people the world over, is the prayer of my heart, even so. Amen.

 

 

(President Heber J. Grant, Conference Report, October 1942, Afternoon Meeting.)

 

 

Gods’ culture is totally unselfish, it is the highest degree in the celestial kingdom, and all there have the pure love of Christ

 

The OT culture didn’t have romantic love until after the marriage took place; it was by arrangement, Isaac, etc.

 

 

 

 

 

President Lorenzo Snow

 

September 16, 2004

 

 

 

Eliza R. Snow introduced her brother to the Church by getting him to come to Kirtland and take Hebrew classes taught at the School of the Prophets.

 

He had a revelation about the nature of God that he didn’t share with others until he heard the Prophet teach the same doctrine in the King Follett discourse.

 

Joseph Smith also wrote, "Every man who reigns in celestial glory is a God to his dominions" (TPJS, p. 374). This does not mean that any person ever would or could supplant God as the Supreme Being in the universe; but it does mean that through God's plan and with his help, all men and women have the capacity to participate in God's eternal work. People participate in this work by righteous living, by giving birth to children in mortality and helping them live righteous lives, and by bringing others to Christ. Moreover, Latter-day Saints believe that those who become gods will have the opportunity to participate even more fully in God's work of bringing eternal life to other beings. God is referred to as "Father in Heaven" because he is the father of all human spirits (Heb. 12:9; cf. Acts 17:29), imbuing them with divine potentials. Those who become like him will likewise contribute to this eternal process by adding further spirit offspring to the eternal family.

 

Latter-day Saints believe that God achieved his exalted rank by progressing much as man must progress and that God is a perfected and exalted man: "God himself was once as we are now, and is an exalted man, and sits enthroned in yonder heavens! That is the great secret. If the veil were rent today, and the great God who holds this world in its orbit, and who upholds all worlds and all things by his power, was to make himself visible,-I say, if you were to see him today, you would see him like a man in form-like yourselves in all the person, image, and very form as a man; for Adam was created in the very fashion, image and likeness of God, and received instruction from, and walked, talked and conversed with him, as one man talks and communes with another" (TPJS, p. 345).

 

Much of the LDS concept of godhood is expressed in a frequently cited aphorism written in 1840 by Lorenzo Snow, fifth President of the Church. At the time, Snow was twenty-six years old, having been baptized four years earlier. He recorded in his journal that he attended a meeting in which Elder H. G. Sherwood explained the parable of the Savior regarding the husbandman who hired servants and sent them forth at different hours of the day to labor for him in his vineyard. Snow continued, as recorded in his sister's biography of him: "The Spirit of the Lord rested mightily upon me-the eyes of my understanding were opened, and I saw as clear as the sun at noonday, with wonder and astonishment, the pathway of God and man. I formed the following couplet which expresses the revelation, as it was shown me…. As man now is, God once was: As God now is, man may be" (Eliza R. Snow, p. 46).

 

 

(Encyclopedia of Mormonism, 1-4 vols., edited by Daniel H. Ludlow (New York: Macmillan, 1992), 554.)

 

 

He was made an apostle after Joseph’s death; he served missions all over the world.

 

Wilford Woodruff told him to reorganize the 1st Presidency immediately after his death, this came from the Lord.

 

The 12 were doing many other duties that were temporal not spiritual.  In his last address he spoke of changes that needed to happen to realign the Church to the Lord’s will.

 

President Lorenzo Snow

 

Evidence of advancement— Responsibilities of stake and ward officers—they must lay their duties upon the Twelve Apostles to look after interests of the world—Selection of Second Counselor.

 

My dear brethren and sisters, it is rather a marvel to me that I venture to, talk to you this afternoon; not but that I have something to say and would really like to have the time and the voice to say it, and perhaps by the exercise of your faith and prayers I may have the voice to address you for a few minutes. I have been delighted to hear-of the spirit that has attended the speakers since this conference opened. It shows to me one glorious fact—that during the last six months the Latter-day Saints have not been idle. When the Elders address this conference and the Spirit is upon them more than it was at the preceding conference, it shows most clearly that there has been an advance on the part of the Latter-day Saints in the performance of their duties. The next conference we have, if the Saints will continue to improve as they have done during the last six months, our Elders will have more of the Spirit, and their addresses will be even more intelligent and more serviceable to you than they have been during this conference.

 

Brethren and sisters, God bless you. This is what I wanted to say to you. I have had a distressing cold the last eight or ten days, which has made me very hoarse, and I feared that I would not be able to appear at all during this conference.

 

I want to say a few words in reference to one particular subject. And I do not want what I shall say to be forgotten. It is a matter that concerns all the Saints; you are all interested in it, and especially the Presidents of Stakes, their counselors, the High Councilors, the Bishops and their counselors, and all those who have been appointed to hold certain portions of the Holy Priesthood and to be actively engaged in the various Stakes of Zion. There are now fifty Stakes of Zion and these Stakes are composed of several wards. On an average there are probably seven or eight wards to each Stake. Over each Stake there are a president and two counselors and twelve High Councilors. Then there are Bishops and counselors over the respective wards. And now, what responsibilities rest upon the officials of these fifty Stakes; the dominion of the Latter-day Saints, to a large extent, and the highest and most sacred responsibilities are depending upon these fifty presidents; and there is something to do for each of these authorities that I have mentioned. The most extensive and important responsibilities devolve upon these officials. And although, I doubt not, they have been pretty faithful in the past, they have not been so faithful in some respects, as they ought to have been; they have not realized their sacred responsibilities so much as they might have done.

 

This Church is now nearly seventy two years of age, and we are not expected to do the work of the days of our youth, but to do greater, larger and more extensive work. The Lord is coming one of these days, and He is interested in the work that you ought to be doing, and anxious to be doing. You ought to do all that you possibly, can, and leave everything in your business affairs that you wisely can do and attend to these matters. The presidents of these fifty Stakes should consider the people in their respective Stakes, in their various dominions. They should regard them as their own family, as their sons and daughters; and take as deep an interest in them as they ought to take in their own wives and children. It should be their thought by day and by night, how and in what way they can be most serviceable to their respective charges. Oh! Brethren, do remember these things that I am now talking about; do not forget them. You presidents, when you retire to your rest, you probably can spend half an hour before you go to sleep, and let your thoughts run over your several jurisdictions. See wherein, either physically, financially or spiritually, you can help, and what can be done best in advancing the interests of your official family. These Bishops, however wise and energetic they may think themselves—and the most of them certainly are very wise and energetic—need to be looked after. It is not the duty of the Apostles to look after them.

 

The Apostles have a work that is in another direction altogether. I want the Presidents of Stakes hereafter to realize that it is their business, not the business of the Apostles; it is the business of the High Priests, the Elders, the Bishops, Priests, Teachers and Deacons to look after these things. Do not lay this duty upon the shoulders of the Apostles. It is not in their line, at least only occasionally. There is a certain channel by and through which the Lord intends to exalt His sons and daughters, to remove wickedness from the earth and to establish righteousness, and that channel is the Priesthood, which God has established and shown clearly the nature and character of the various officers and duties thereof. The Apostles and the Seventies, it is their business by the appointment of the Almighty, to look after the interests of the world. The Seventies and the Twelve Apostles are special witnesses unto the nations of the earth. The business of the High Priests, the Elders and the Bishops is to look after the interests of these various organizations that I have mentioned. You presiding officers of the various Stakes of Zion, the time is coming when you will not have to call and depend so much upon the Twelve Apostles. They will be directed in other channels, and I want you to distinctly understand it; and do not seek to throw responsibilities that belong to you upon these Twelve Apostles and upon the Seventies.

 

I wanted to say this, and to speak it with energy and in a way that you will not forget it, that you cannot forget it, it is a wonderful responsibility, and the Lord expects it of you. You ought to know how the laws of God are observed in your respective localities-how the Sabbath is kept; whether the young people are swearing, and off at midnight when they ought to be at home; how the parents govern and control them; how far the people are paying their tithing correctly; what they are doing in regard to their meeting houses, their school houses, and their houses of amusement; whether they are expending their time and means too much in these directions, or not enough; and what you can do in helping them along. Look at these things, and everything that pertains to the happiness of your children, the members of this family of yours, see what you can do about it. And the Lord God of Israel will help you in this, because it is just what He wants you to do. It is the duty that He has placed upon you to discharge, and He certainly will help you. But when you take any other course—when you depend upon the Apostles to reform your respective Stakes—you are doing that which you have no business to do. Do it yourselves, you Presidents of Stakes and counselors, you High Councilors, and you Bishops. The High Council should visit all through the Stake which they have charge of in connection with the President and his counselors. It is not the business altogether of the High Council to just wait till some persons come before them and want some little trifle settled. They have got to do something else, more noble and grand than such little matters. Go where you can do good, and be lively in it.

 

Now, God bless you Latter-day Saints. I am glad to see such a vast Multitude as there is here, and that I understand has been throughout this conference. I repeat, I am so delighted to hear that the Spirit of God has been on the Elders so bountifully as it has, and that they have spoken so well and so wisely to you as they have. I thank you for the faith you have exercised, because when I arose here I did not know that I could speak five words; but now I have said what I wanted to say. A great deal could be enlarged upon this, and the brethren will do so as opportunity serves.

 

There is still one matter that I might speak of. I am going on pretty fast toward my eighty-eighth year; I will soon be eighty-eight years old; and I have been laboring now for some months with but one counselor—President Joseph F. Smith. I feel as though I wanted a little more help—another counselor; and I have selected one, (through, I believe, the manifestations of the Lord), who, I think, will be energetic and strong, will serve the people, and help me and President Joseph F. Smith along in a proper way; and I hope you will sustain and support him. God bless you. Amen.

 

 

(President Lorenzo Snow, Conference Report, October 1901, Overflow Meeting 60.)

 

 

 

 

 

President Joseph F. Smith

 

September 23, 2004

 

 

 

He endured tremendous persecution throughout his Presidency, especially from the local press.  It was because of plural marriage.

 

Reed Smoot did not enter into plural marriage and was accepted into the U.S. Senate, B H Roberts who did enter into plural marriage was not accepted to sit in the House of Representatives.

 

Financial circumstances improve for the church and historical sites start to be purchased, the church is out of debt by 1906, self sustaining.

 

Liberal minded individuals defend the church, T. Roosevelt and W. Churchill are in that group, several are less favorable, Twain, Conan Doyle, and R. Stevenson. 

 

The women’s movement is encouraged by the church; Sister E. Wells was given as an example.

 

A letter went out asking members outside of Utah to stay home and build up the kingdom where they live, in 1955 David O. McKay sent out the 12 with the same message.

 

The Hotel Utah was built with the same purpose as the Nauvoo House in Section 124.  The church buildings are built to last.

 

 

President Smith was a true gospel scholar; doctrine was clarified greatly during his administration.  Church histories were written by the church and by B H Roberts.  Several doctrinal treatises were written stating true doctrine for the members of the church and the world.  Two examples were “The Origin of Man” and “The Father and the Son”, also his talks were compiled in a book published by the church called “Gospel Doctrine”.  President Lee said if he needed clarification of doctrine he turned to this book.

 

Elder James E. Talmage also wrote classic books full of doctrine.  Bruce told the story of “Jesus the Christ” which was written in a room inside the Salt Lake temple.  Also how his lectures in the Assembly Hall on the Articles of Faith became a book, (what a Know your Religion those must have been!!).

 

Finally his book “House of the Lord” was in response to a black mail attempt to publish pictures of the inside of the Salt Lake temple.  The book was published with pictures of the rooms inside the temple!!

 

Books written by General Authorities and members do not replace the scriptures; it is their viewpoints of the gospel.  It is just like the NT writers, it is their viewpoint of what they saw or heard or felt by the Spirit, and why they wanted to tell their particular story.

 

We had a great discussion on this topic.  Study the gospels separately not harmonized.  Study why Matthew or Luke wrote what they wrote, what was the message they tried to get across.  This is the same with the gospel of Talmage or the gospel of McConkie, or the gospel of Maxwell.

 

We simply read and relate the STORIES of scripture not understanding the underlining message the author wants us to see.  There are reasons why not all of the gospel writers include the same stories in their writings!!!

 

The Holy Ghost brings us to Christ, Christ brings us to the Father, and we worship the Father.  Christ directs all of us to the Father, Matthew 19, and John 7:17, Moses 1:6 etc.

 

In the OT, Eloheim and Jehovah are the same.

 

FHE started in 1915 in the Granite stake, the church adopted the program.

 

Revelation comes from God >>> Priesthood Leaders >>> Man

Man asks how to apply it by asking God.

 

President Smith became intimately acquainted with the other side of the veil in the last 3 years of his ministry.

 

One of his greatest talks was the opening address of Conference in April, 1916.

 

There is power in righteousness, power that activates God's covenant with his people, power that binds and seals here and hereafter, power that links the children of Abraham, the children of the covenant, together in love and unity. Righteous parents thereby have great positive impact on generations to come. "Ye are the children of the prophets," the risen Lord declared to the Nephites; "and ye are of the house of Israel; and ye are of the covenant which the Father made with your fathers, saying unto Abraham: And in thy seed shall all the kindreds of the earth be blessed. The Father having raised me up unto you first, and sent me to bless you in turning away every one of you from his iniquities; and this because ye are the children of the covenant" (3 Nephi 20:25-26; emphasis added).

 

The pull of the covenant toward righteousness may come from both sides of the veil. The counsel of Elisha the prophet is still timely: "Fear not: for they that be with us are more than they that be with them" (2 Kings 6:16). My friend and colleague Joseph McConkie told me that his grandfather, Oscar McConkie Sr., said to the family just before his death: "I am going to die. When I die, I shall not cease to love you. I shall not cease to pray for you. I shall not cease to labor in your behalf." President Joseph F. Smith, in a general conference address in April 1916 entitled "In the Presence of the Divine," made the following impressive and instructive remarks:

 

 "Sometimes the Lord expands our vision from this point of view and this side of the veil, so that we feel and seem to realize that we can look beyond the thin veil which separates us from that other sphere. If we can see, by the enlightening influence of the Spirit of God and through the words that have been spoken by the holy prophets of God, beyond the veil that separates us from the spirit world, surely those who have passed beyond, can see more clearly through the veil back here to us than it is possible for us to see to them from our sphere of action. I believe we move and have our being in the presence of heavenly messengers and of heavenly beings. We are not separate from them. We begin to realize, more and more fully, as we become acquainted with the principles of the gospel, as they have been revealed anew in this dispensation, that we are closely related to our kindred, to our ancestors, to our friends and associates and co-laborers who have preceded us into the spirit world. We can not forget them; we do not cease to love them; we always hold them in our hearts, in memory. . . . How much more certain it is and reasonable and consistent to believe that those who have been faithful, who have gone beyond and are still engaged in the work for the salvation of the souls of men, . . . can see us better than we can see them; that they know us better than we know them. They have advanced; we are advancing; we are growing as they have grown; we are reaching the goal that they have attained unto; and therefore, I claim that we live in their presence, they see us, they are solicitous for our welfare, they love us now more than ever. For now they see the dangers that beset us; they can comprehend, better than ever before, the weaknesses that are liable to mislead us into dark and forbidden paths. They see the temptations and the evils that beset us in life and the proneness of mortal beings to yield to temptation and to wrong doing; hence their solicitude for us, and their love for us, and their desire for our well being, must be greater than that which we feel for ourselves."24

 

"Rewards for obedience to the commandments," Elder Russell M. Nelson explained, "are almost beyond mortal comprehension. Here, children of the covenant become a strain of sin-resistant souls. And hereafter . . . children of the covenant, and 'each generation [will] be linked to the one which went on before . . . [in] the divine family of God.' Great comfort comes from the knowledge that our loved ones are secured to us through the covenants."25

 

In summary, the Holy One of Israel, who is the Mediator of the Covenant, has extended the promise that when a seal is placed upon a father and mother—a seal that comes through faithfulness to their eternal covenants—their children will be bound to them forever. Even if the children stray for a season, the tentacles of the everlasting covenant will feel after them and they shall, either here or hereafter, return to the fold. We do not fully understand all of the implications of this marvelous promise, but we feel to trust in the ransoming and redeeming power of our Lord who is also our Savior.

 

 "God has fulfilled his promises to us," President Lorenzo Snow explained, "and our prospects are grand and glorious. Yes, in the next life we will have our wives, and our sons and daughters. If we do not get them all at once, we will have them some time, for every knee shall bow and every tongue shall confess that Jesus is the Christ. You that are mourning about your children straying away will have your sons and your daughters. If you succeed in passing through these trials and afflictions and receive a resurrection, you will, by the power of the Priesthood, work and labor, as the Son of God has, until you get all your sons and daughters in the path of exaltation and glory. This is just as sure as that the sun rose this morning over yonder mountains. Therefore, mourn not because all your sons and daughters do not follow in the path that you have marked out to them, or give heed to your counsels. Inasmuch as we succeed in securing eternal glory, and stand as saviors and as kings and priests to our God, we will save our posterity. . . . God will have His own way in His own time, and He will accomplish His purposes in the salvation of His sons and daughters. . . . God bless you, brethren and sisters. Do not be discouraged is the word I wish to pass to you; but remember that righteousness and joy in the Holy Ghost is what you and I have the privilege of possessing at all times."26

 

 

(Robert L. Millet, Selected Writings of Robert L. Millet: Gospel Scholars Series [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 2000], 539.)

 

 

Elder Maxwell talked a lot about the other side of the veil before he died also!

 

 

 

 

President Heber J. Grant – Welfare

 

 

September 30, 2004

 

 

 

 

Love thy neighbor as thyself means to take care of others, as you take care of yourself.  President Benson stated that when we put God first in our lives everything else either falls out of our lives or we take time to help others, Elder Maxwell on the 1st and 2nd commandment.

 

Richard Cowan “Latter Day Saint Century” 20th century history of the Church

 

Revelation comes from either directions top down or bottom up.  President Harold B. Lee applied the scriptures on welfare and consecration in the D&C for his stake, the Church adopted the welfare program he was using in his stake.

 

President J. Reuben Clark in April 1937 told the saints to get out of debt, it’s still the counsel today but often ignored.

 

We renounce war as a Church but the Lord will use the situation to his advantage.  President Grant had a very difficult mission in Japan, but after the war missionary work opened up in that country.  Could the same thing happen in Afghanistan and Iraq today? Duh!!

 

President Hinckley April, 2004 “Hungered and ye gave me Meat”

 

The Book of Mormon brings men to Christ. The Doctrine and Covenants brings men to Christ's kingdom, even The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 'the only true and living church upon the face of the whole earth' (D&C 1:30). I know that.

The Book of Mormon is the "keystone" of our religion, and the Doctrine and Covenants is the capstone, with continuing latter-day revelation. The Lord has placed His stamp of approval on both the keystone and the capstone.

 

President Ezra Taft Benson

CR, April 1987, p. 105

 

 

Book of Mormon teaches about mortality and probation, it also teaches about the Atonement and repentance, also the concept of heaven and hell.

 

The D&C teaches the same concepts in greater detail and also includes the spirit world and the millennium with degrees of glory in the next life.

 

The Church is the kingdom of God on earth, this continues forever in the highest degree in the Celestial kingdom.  We need to do more than repent; we must live the law of the Kingdom of God.  We will be a people completely united in all things.  The Law of Consecration is lived in the Kingdom of God.

 

Bruce reviewed a couple of talks on welfare.

 

 

The Purpose of Church Welfare Services

President Marion G. Romney
Second Counselor in the First Presidency
Ensign, May 1977, pp. 92-95

[Underlining is NOT original]

My beloved brothers and sisters, I ask you to join with me in a prayer that the Lord will he with us and inspire the talks given here this morning, and I hope my remarks will be in harmony with them. I hope that every one of you bishops and branch presidents has a clear understanding of the many resources available to assist you in administering Church welfare services. I urge you to actively use these many resources. I hope we all understand how our consecrations to the Lord--whether in time, work, or money--unite to relieve suffering while sanctifying both the giver and the receiver. I have been pleased with the explanation of the role of the Lord's storehouse and how production projects serve to fill it with both "meat and money."

Since we have so far in this meeting concentrated on how we should minister in the Lord's own way, I shall center my remarks on why we are engaged in this great program. Almost from the beginning of my services in Church welfare I have had the conviction that what we are doing in this welfare work is preliminary to the reestablishment of the law of consecration and stewardship as required under the united order. If we could always remember the goal toward which we are working, we would never lose our bearings in this great work. What we are about is not newIt is as old as the gospel itself. Whenever the Lord has had a people who would accept and live the gospel, He has established the united order. He established it among the people of Enoch, of whom the record says:

"The Lord blessed the land, and they were blessed upon the mountains, and upon the high places, and did flourish.

"And the Lord called his people Zion, because they were of one heart and one mind, and dwelt in righteousness; and there was no poor among them." (Moses 7:17-18.)

If we will do the things the Lord has asked us to do, we too will continue to be blessed and will grow in righteousness. In the revelation that the Prophet specified as "embracing the law of the Church" (D&C 42, chapter heading), the Lord said:

"Behold, thou wilt remember the poor, and consecrate of thy properties for their support that which thou hast to impart unto them. …

"And inasmuch as ye impart of your substance unto the poor, ye will do it unto me; and they shall be laid before the bishop of my church and his counselors. …

"And it shall come to pass, that after they are laid before the bishop of my church, … it shall be kept to administer to those who have not, from time to time, that every man who has need may be amply supplied and receive according to his wants.

"Therefore, the residue shall be kept in my storehouse, to administer to the poor and the needy." (D&C 42:30-34.)

"And this I do," said the Lord, "for the salvation of my people." (D&C 42:36; italics added.)

In this revelation, which the Prophet designated the "law of the Church," the Lord revealed the essentials of the united order, which was His program for eliminating the inequalities among men. It is based upon the underlying concept that the earth and all things therein belong to the Lord, and that men hold earthly possessions as stewards accountable to Him.

"I, the Lord," He said, "stretched out the heavens, and built the earth, … and all things therein are mine.

"And it is my purpose to provide for my saints, for all things are mine.

"But it must needs be done in mine own way." (D&C 104:14-16.)
 

In His way, there are two cardinal principles: (1) consecration, and (2) stewardship.

To enter the united order, one consecrated all his possessions to the Church by a "covenant and a deed which [could not] be broken." That is, he completely divested himself of all his property by conveying it to the Church.

Having done so, the consecrator received from the Church a stewardship by a like conveyance. This stewardship could be more or less than the original consecration, the object being to make "every man equal according to his family, according to his circumstances and his wants and needs." (D&C 51:3.)

This procedure preserved in every man the right of private ownership and management of his property. Indeed, the fundamental principle of the system was the private ownership of property. Each man owned his portion, or inheritance, or stewardship, with an absolute title, which, at his option, he could alienate, keep and operate, or otherwise treat as his own. The Church did not own all of the property, and life under the united order was not, and never will be, a communal life, as the Prophet Joseph himself said.

The intent was, however, for him to so operate his property as to produce a living for himself and his dependents. So long as he remained in the order, he consecrated to the Church the surplus he produced above the needs and wants of his own family. This surplus went into a storehouse, from which stewardships were given to others, and from which the needs of the poor were supplied.
 

These divine principles are very simple and easily understood. However, there are a number of concepts which must prevail in order for this ideal to be realized. Chief among these concepts are the following:
 

1. A belief in God and acceptance of Him as Lord of the earth and the author of the united order. Through it we seek righteousness and spiritual development. "For," declared the Lord, "if ye are not equal in earthly things ye cannot be equal in obtaining heavenly things;

"For if you will," he continued, "that I give unto you a place in the celestial world, you must prepare yourselves by doing the things which I have commanded you and required of you. …

"That you may come up unto the crown prepared for you, and be made rulers over many kingdoms, saith the Lord God, the Holy One of Zion." (D&C 78:6-7, 15; italics added.)

2. The united order is implemented by the voluntary freewill actions of men, evidenced by a consecration of all their property to the Church of God. No force of any kind is ever involved.

3. As to property, in harmony with Church belief as set forth in the Doctrine and Covenants, "no government can exist in peace, except such laws are framed and held inviolate as will secure to each individual the free exercise of conscience, [and] the right and control of property." (D&C 134:2.) The united order is operated upon the principle of private ownership and individual management. Thus, in both ownership and management of property, the united order preserved to men their God-given agency. In this way, He holds each steward accountable for his own work and productivity. Indeed, He said:

"For it is expedient that I, the Lord, should make every man accountable, as a steward over earthly blessings, which I have made and prepared for my creatures." (D&C 104:13.)

You can see from this the truth of President Clark's statement when he said:

"The Church never was, and under existing commandments never will be, a communal society, under the directions thus far given by the Lord. The United Order was not communal nor communistic. It was completely and intensely individualistic, with a consecration of unneeded surpluses for the support of the Church and the poor." (J. Reuben Clark, Jr., "The United Order and Law of Consecration As Set Out in the Revelations of the Lord," from a pamphlet of articles reprinted from the Church Section of the Deseret News, 1942, pp. 26-27.)

4. The united order is nonpolitical. It is therefore totally unlike the various forms of socialism, which are political, both in theory and in practice. They are thus exposed to, and riddled by, the corruption which plagues and finally destroys all political governments which undertake to abridge man's agency.

5. A righteous people is a prerequisite to the united order.

6. The united order exalts the poor and humbles the rich. In the process both are sanctified. The poor, released from the bondage and humiliating limitations of poverty, are enabled as free men to rise to their full potential, both temporally and spiritually. The rich, by consecration and by imparting of their surplus for the benefit of the poor, not by constraint, but willingly as an act of free will, evidence that charity for their fellowmen characterized by Mormon as "the pure love of Christ." (Moro. 7:47.) In this way they qualify to "become the sons of God." (Moro. 7:48.)
 

With these concepts in mind, we are better prepared to understand how our present Welfare Services efforts relate to the united order and the full ideal of Zion which the Lord has in mind to bring about. Because the people were not then fully ready to live the united order, the Lord suspended it, because, as He said:

"They have not learned to be obedient to the things which I required at their hands, but are full of all manner of evil, and do not impart of their substance, as becometh saints, to the poor and afflicted among them;

"And are not united according to the union required by the law of the celestial kingdom;

"And Zion cannot be built up unless it is by the principles of the law of the celestial kingdom; otherwise I cannot receive her unto myself." (D&C 105:3-5.)

He further indicated that:

"It is expedient in me that mine elders should wait for a little season for the redemption of Zion--

"That they themselves may be prepared, and that my people may be taught more perfectly, and have experience, and know more perfectly concerning their duty, and the things which I require at their hands." (D&C 105:9-10.)

Full implementation of the united order must, according to the revelation, await the redemption of Zion. (See D&C 105:34.) In the meantime-while we are being more perfectly taught and are gaining experience-we should be strictly living the principles of the united order insofar as they are embodied in present Church requirements, such as tithing, fast offerings, welfare projects, storehouses, and other principles and practices. Through these programs we should, as individuals, implement in our own lives the bases of the united order.

The law of tithing, for example, gives us a great opportunity to implement the principle of consecration and stewardship. When it was instituted, four years after the united order experiment was suspended, the Lord required the people to put "all their surplus property … into the hands of the bishop"; thereafter they were to "pay one-tenth of all their interest annually." (D&C 119:1, 4.) This law, still in force, implements to a degree at least the united order principle of stewardship. It leaves in the hands of each person the ownership and management of the property from which he produces the needs of himself and family. To use again the words of President Clark:

"In lieu of residues and surpluses which were accumulated and built up under the United Order, we, today, have our fast offerings, our Welfare donations, and our tithing, all of which may be devoted to the care of the poor, as well as the carrying on of the activities and business of the Church. …

"Furthermore, we had under the United Order a bishop's storehouse in which were collected the materials from which to supply the needs and the wants of the poor. We have a bishop's storehouse under the Welfare Plan, used for the same purpose. …

"We have now under the Welfare Plan all over the church, … projects … farmed [or managed] for the benefit of the poor. …

"Thus … in many of its great essentials, we have, [in] the Welfare Plan … the broad essentials of the United Order." (Conference Report, Oct. 1942, pp. 57-58.)

It is thus apparent that when the principles of tithing and the fast are properly observed and the welfare plan gets fully developed and wholly into operation, "we shall not be so very far from carrying out the great fundamentals of the United Order." (Ibid., p. 57.) The only limitation on you and me is within ourselves.
 

And now in line with these remarks, for three things I pray:
 

1. That the Lord will quicken our understanding of the covenant of consecration which we who are endowed have all made. President Kimball, in a landmark article published in the June 1976 Ensign, has encouraged us to review what our righteous needs and desires are as compared to what our surplus or residue might be:

"Many people spend most of their time working in the service of a self-image that includes sufficient money, stocks, bonds, investment portfolios, property, credit cards, furnishings, automobiles, and the like to guarantee carnal security throughout, it is hoped, a long and happy life. Forgotten is the fact that our assignment is to use these many resources in our families and quorums to build up the kingdom of God--to further the missionary effort and the genealogical and temple work; to raise our children up as fruitful servants unto the Lord; to bless others in every way, that they may also be fruitful. Instead, we expend these blessings on our own desires, and as Moroni said, 'Ye adorn yourselves with that which hath no life, and yet suffer the hungry, and the needy, and the naked, and the sick and the afflicted to pass by you, and notice them not.' (Morm. 8:39.)

"As the Lord himself said in our day, 'They seek not the Lord to establish his righteousness, but every man walketh in his own way, and after the image of his own God, whose image is in the likeness of the world, and whose substance is that of an idol, which waxeth old and shall perish in Babylon, even Babylon the great, which shall fall.' (D&C 1:16; italics added.)" (Ensign, June 1976, pp. 4-5.)
 

2. That we will study the talks of this session carefully and implement according to the dictates of the Spirit each facet of the welfare effort, particularly the establishment of the Lord's storehouses.
 

3. That through faithful observance of the principles of tithing, the fast, and the welfare program, we will prepare ourselves to redeem Zion and ultimately live the united order is my prayer, in the name of Jesus Christ, our Lord. Amen.

The other talks were by President Kimball “Welfare is the Gospel in Action” and Elder Packer “Solving Emotional Problems in the Lords own Way”

Solving Emotional Problems In The Lord's Own Way

Elder Boyd K. Packer

April 1978

Our bishops face increasing calls to counsel members with problems that have more to do with emotional needs than with the need for food or clothing or shelter.

My message, therefore, is to the subject: solving emotional problems in the Lord's own way.

Fortunately, the principles of temporal welfare apply to emotional problems as well.

The Church was two years old when the Lord revealed that "the idler shall not have place in the church, except he repent and mend his ways. (D&C 75:29.)

The Welfare handbook instructs: "[We must] earnestly teach and urge Church members to be self-sustaining to the full extent of their powers. No true Latter-day Saint will... voluntarily shift from himself the burden of his own support. So long as he can, under the inspiration of the Almighty and with his own labors, he will supply himself with the necessities of life." (1952, p. 2.)

We have succeeded fairly well in teaching Latter-day Saints that they should take care of their own material needs and then contribute to the welfare of those who cannot provide for themselves.

If a member is unable to sustain himself, then he is to call upon his own family, and then upon the Church, in that order, and not upon the government at all.

We have counseled bishops and stake presidents to be very careful to avoid abuses in the welfare program.

When people are able but unwilling to take care of themselves, we are responsible to employ the dictum of the Lord that the idler shall not eat the bread of the laborer. (See D&C 42:42.)

The simple rule has been to take care of one's self. This couplet of truth has been something of a model: "Eat it up, wear it out, make it do, or do without."

When the Church welfare program was first announced in 1936, the First Presidency said:

"Our primary purpose was to set up, in so far as it might be possible, a system under which the curse of idleness would be done away with, the evils of a dole abolished, and independence, industry, thrift and self respect be once more established amongst our people. The aim of the Church is lo help people help themselves." (Conference Report, Oct. 1936, p. 3; italics added.)

Occasionally someone is attracted to the Church because of our welfare program. They see material security.

Our answer to them is: "Yes, join the Church for that reason. We can use all of the help we can get. You will be called upon continually to bless and assist others."

Interesting how enthusiasm for baptism often fades away.

It is a self-help system, not a quick handout system. It requires a careful inventory of all personal and family resources, all of which must be committed before anything is added from the outside.

It is not an unkind or an unfeeling bishop who requires a member to work to the fullest extent he can for what he receives from Church welfare.

There should not be the slightest embarrassment for any member to be assisted by the Church. Provided, that is that he has contributed all that he can.

President Romney has emphasized, "To care for people on any other basis is to do them more harm than good.

"The purpose of Church welfare is not to relieve [a Church member] from taking care of himself." (Conference Report, Oct. 1974, p. 166; italics added.)

The principle of self-reliance or personal independence is fundamental to the happy life. In too many places, in too many ways, we are getting away from it.

The substance of what I want to say is this: The same principle self-reliance--has application to the spiritual and to the emotional.

We have been taught to store a year's supply of food, clothing, and, if possible, fuel--at home. There has been no attempt to set up storerooms in every chapel. We know that in the crunch our members may not be able to get to the chapel for supplies.

Can we not see that the same principle applies to inspiration and revelation, the solving of problems, to counsel, and to guidance?

We need to have a source of it stored in every home, not just in the bishop's office.

If we do not do that, we are quite as threatened spiritually as we should be were we to assume that the Church should supply all material needs.

Unless we use care, we are on the verge of doing to ourselves emotionally (and, therefore, spiritually) what we have been working so hard for generations to avoid materially.

We seem to be developing an epidemic of "counselitis" which drains spiritual strength from the Church much like the common cold drains more strength out of humanity than any other disease.

That, some may assume, is not serious. It is very serious!

On one hand, we counsel bishops to avoid abuses in welfare help. On the other hand, some bishops dole out counsel and advice without considering that the member should solve the problem himself.

There are many chronic cases--individuals who endlessly seek counsel but do not follow the counsel that is given.

I have, on occasions, included in an interview this question:

"You have come to me for advice. After we have carefully considered your problem, is it your intention to follow the counsel that I will give you?"

This comes as a considerable surprise to them. They had never thought of that. Usually they then commit themselves to follow counsel.

It is easier then to show them how to help themselves, and more than that, how to help others. That is the greatest therapy.

Speaking figuratively, many a bishop keeps on the corner of his desk a large stack of order forms for emotional relief.

When someone comes with a problem, the bishop, unfortunately, without a question, passes them out, without stopping to think what he is doing to his people.

We have become very anxious over the amount of counseling that we seem to need in the Church. Our members are becoming dependent.

We must not set up a network of counseling services without at the same time emphasizing the principle of emotional self-reliance and individual independence.

If we lose our emotional and spiritual independence, our self-reliance, we can be weakened quite as much, perhaps even more, than when we become dependent materially.

If we are not careful, we can lose the power of individual revelation. What the Lord said to Oliver Cowdery has meaning for all of us.

"Behold, you have not understood; you have supposed that I would give it unto you, when you took no thought save it was to ask me.

"But, behold, I say unto you, that you must study it out in your mind; then you must ask me if it be right, and if it is right I will cause that your bosom shall burn within you; therefore, you shall feel that it is right.

"But if it be not right you shall have no such feelings, but you shall have a stupor of thought that shall cause you to forget the thing which is wrong." (D&C 9:7-9.)

Spiritual independence and self-reliance is a sustaining power in the Church. If we rob the members of that how can they get revelation for themselves? How will they know there is a prophet of God? How can they get answers to prayers? How can they know for sure for themselves?

It is not an unfeeling bishop who requires those coming to him for counsel to exhaust every personal and family resource before helping them.

Bishops, be careful with your "emotional order forms." Do not pass them out without having analyzed carefully the individual resources.

Teach our members to follow proper channels in solving problems.

It is not unusual for some to "shop around" to get advice from friends and neighbors, from every direction, and then choose what they think is the best of it. That is a mistake.

Some want to start with psychologists, with professional counselors, or to go directly to the General Authorities to begin with.

The problems may need that kind of attention but only after every personal, and family, and every local resource has been exhausted.

We mentioned that when a member has used all of his own resources there should be no embarrassment in receiving welfare assistance.

That principle holds true with emotional assistance as well.

There may be a time when deep-seated emotional problems need more than can be given by the family, the bishop, or the stake president.

In order to help with the very difficult problems, the Church has established some counseling services in areas where our membership is large. (Only for those that come through proper channels.)

The first category includes those services that ordinarily require a license from the local, state, or national government. The licensed services include:

• adoptions,

• the care of unwed mothers,

• the foster care of children,

• and, the Indian Placement Program.

In July of 1977 the First Presidency issued a letter giving some instruction and caution to priesthood leaders, with reference to licensed services.

Our purpose here will be to review principles that apply to the services offered under the heading clinical.

Clinical services are offered (again, through proper channels only) in three successive steps:

First: consultation, where a priesthood leader consults with an LDS Social Services representative about a member with serious problems. Only the priesthood leader meets with the member.

The next step is evaluation, wherein a priesthood leader and the member meet together with an LDS Social Services practitioner to evaluate the problem. Ordinarily this is one meeting only. Thereafter, the priesthood leader continues to help the member.

In difficult and persistent cases, there is therapy. The member (and, when possible, the bishop) meets with an LDS Social Services practitioner for counseling. The bishop gives continuing help after termination of these sessions.

Bishops and stake presidents can exemplify self-reliance by resolving these problems locally. Ultimately it is the member who must solve them.

Bishops, you must not abdicate your responsibility to anyone--not to professionals, even to those employed by Church Social Services. They would be the first to tell you so.

You have a power to soothe and to sanctify and to heal that others are not given.

Sometimes what a member needs is forgiveness--you have a key to that.

If you find a case where professional help is justified, be very careful.

There are some spiritually destructive techniques used in the field of counseling. When you entrust your members to others, do not let them be subject to these things. Solve problems in the Lord's way.

Some counselors want to delve deeper than is emotionally or spiritually healthy. They sometimes want to draw out and analyze and take apart and dissect.

While a certain amount of catharsis may be healthy, overmuch of it can be degenerating. It is seldom as easy to put something back together as it is to take it apart.

By probing too deeply, or talking endlessly about some problems, we can foolishly cause the very thing we are trying to prevent.

You probably know about the parents who said, "Now, children, while we are gone, whatever you do, don't take the stool and go into the pantry and climb up to the second shelf and move the cracker box and get that sack of beans and put one up your nose, will you?"

There is a lesson there.

Now, a bishop may ask, justifiably, "How in the world can I ever accomplish my job as bishop and still counsel those who really need it?"

One stake president said to me: "Bishops don't have enough time to counsel. With the load we're putting on them, we're killing our bishops off."

While there's some truth in that I sometimes think it's a case of suicide.

Our study of the role of the bishop indicates that most bishops spend time ineffectively as program administrators.

The influence of a bishop on a ward is more positive when he functions as a presiding officer, rather than getting so heavily involved in all of the program details.

It is usually in program administration, with all of the meetings, training activities, etc., that the bishop spends too much time.

Bishops, leave that to your counselors and the priesthood leaders and auxiliary leaders. Problems, for instance, that involve need for employment can be solved by the home teacher and the quorum leaders.

Trust them. Let go of it. And you will then be free to do the things that will make the most difference, counseling those who really need it--in the Lord's own way.

Recently two letters have gone to the field. The one was a two-thirds reduction in the number of personal priesthood interviews required on all levels.

The other was a shifting of major administrative meetings from weekly and monthly to monthly and quarterly.

We have every hope that other relief will be filtering down through channels.

In the meantime, bishop, you are in charge. Get the administrative and training part of your work in such efficient operation that you will have time to counsel your people.

Bishops, keep constantly in mind that fathers are responsible to preside over their families.

Sometimes, with all good intentions, we require so much of both the children and the father that he is not able to do so.

If my boy needs counseling, bishop, it should be my responsibility first, and yours second.

If my boy needs recreation, bishop, I should provide it first, and you second.

If my boy needs correction, that should be my responsibility first, and yours second,

If I am failing as a father, help me first, and my children second.

Do not be too quick to take over from me the job of raising my children.

Do not be too quick to counsel them and solve all of the problems. Get me involved. It is my ministry.

We live in a day when the adversary stresses on every hand the philosophy of instant gratification, We seem to demand instant everything, including instant solutions to our problems.

We are indoctrinated that somehow we should always be instantly emotionally comfortable. When that is not so, some become anxious and all too frequently seek relief from counseling, from analysis, and even from medication.

It was meant to be that life would be a challenge. To suffer some anxiety, some depression, some disappointment, even some failure is normal.

Teach our members that if they have a good, miserable day once in a while, or several in a row, to stand steady and face them. Things will straighten out.

There is great purpose in our struggle in life,

There is great meaning in these words entitled "The Lesson."

 

Yes, my fretting,

Frowning child,

I could cross

The room to you

More easily,

But I've already

Learned to walk

So I make you

Come to me,

Let go now--

There! You see?

Oh, remember

This simple lesson,

Child,

And when

In later years

You cry out

With tight fists

And tears--

"Oh, help me,

God-- please,

Just listen

And you'll hear

A silent voice:

"I would, child,

I would,

But it's you,

Not I,

Who needs to try

Godhood."

(Carol Lynn Pearson, "The Lesson Beginnings," New York: Doubleday and Co., 1975, p. 18.)

Bishop, those who come to you are children of God. Counsel them in the Lord's own way. Teach them to ponder it in their minds, then to pray over their problems.

Remember that soothing, calming effect of reading the scriptures. Next time you are where they are read, notice how things settle down. Sense the feeling of peace and security that comes.

Now, from the Book of Mormon, this closing thought: The prophet Alma faced a weightier problem than you, bishop, will likely see in your ministry, Like you, he felt uncertain; and he went to Mosiah.

Mosiah wisely turned the problem back to him, saying:

"... Behold, I judge them not; therefore I deliver them into thy hands to be judged.

"And now the spirit of Alma was again troubled; and he went and inquired of the Lord what he should do concerning this matter, for he feared that he should do wrong in the sight of God.

"And it came to pass that after he had poured out his whole soul to God, the voice of the Lord came to him. (Mosiah 26: 12-14.)

That voice will speak to you, bishop. That is your privilege. I bear witness of that, for I know that He lives.

May God bless you, bishop, the inspired judge in Israel , and those who come to you, as you counsel them in the Lord's own way.

In the name of Jesus Christ, amen.

 

Various times in the Book of Mormon when the saints lived the United Order, Alma the Elder at the waters of Mormon and in Zarahemla, 4th Nephi

 

Church during World War II

October 14, 2004

 

Position of the Church on current issues such as war, military service, false political isms, church and state, etc., April 6, 1942

 

1942-April 6-Improvement Era 45:272-274, 343-346, 348-350,

May, 1942; also in abridged form in Liahona, the Elders' Journal 41:517.

 

Two messages of the First Presidency were read at the Annual General Conference by the two counselors in the First Presidency, J. Reuben Clark, Jr., and David O. McKay. They constitute an official statement of the position of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints on the subjects treated. They dealt with current issues, including war, military service, false political isms, etc.

 

 MESSAGE OF THE FIRST PRESIDENCY TO THE CHURCH

 

Read by President J. Reuben Clark, Jr., at the final session of the 112th Annual Conference, Monday, April 6, 1942, in the Assembly Hall, Temple Square, Salt Lake City.

 

In these days of trial and sorrow, when Satan is "seeking to destroy the souls of men" (D&C 10:27) we send to the righteous everywhere our greetings with prayers for their blessing; to the Saints in all lands and on the islands of the seas, we renew our testimonies and pledge our unselfish service, exhorting them to lives obedient to the gospel and the commandments of the Lord; we extend to them the hand of true and faithful fellowship, with deep and abiding love and blessing.

 

Our Testimonies

 

We bear witness to all the world that God lives, and still rules, that His righteous ways and His truth will finally prevail.

 

We bear testimony that Jesus is the Christ, the Only Begotten of the Father, the First Fruits of the Resurrection, the Redeemer of the World, and that "there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved." (Acts 4:12.)

 

We solemnly declare that in these the latter-days, God has again spoken from the heavens through His chosen Prophet, Joseph Smith; that the Lord has, through that same Prophet, again revealed in its fulness His gospel,-the plan of life and salvation; that through that Prophet and his associates He has restored His holy Priesthood to the earth, from which it had been taken because of the wickedness of men; and that all the rights, powers, keys, and functions appertaining to that Priesthood as so restored are now vested in and exercised by the chosen and inspired leadership of His Church,-The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, even as that Priesthood has been exercised on the earth from the Beginning until this day, whenever His Church was here or His work had place among the children of men.

 

These testimonies we bear in all soberness, before God and men, aware that we are answerable to God for the truthfulness thereof. We admonish all men to give ear to these testimonies and to bring their lives into harmony with the gospel of Christ, that on the day "When the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him," they may stand with those on His right hand, to whom He will say, "Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world." (Matt. 25:31, 34.)

 

We shall now speak first of some vital practical matters which should be uppermost in the minds of all Latter-day Saints.

 

Message to Parents

 

It is becoming increasingly clear that very many of our physicians and surgeons will be taken by the government for service with the armed forces. This is well, for we want our soldiers and sailors to have every care which it is possible to give them. But this will leave the civilians with curtailed and probably inadequate medical help. In some areas we shall be left with little more trained assistance than was available to our pioneer fathers. Yet it is our patriotic duty to be as fully effective in production at home as our boys are effective in combat in the field. Those in the front lines cannot be strong unless those behind the lines are strong also. To meet this patriotic duty and to prepare for this threatening condition, we urge all parents to guard with zealous care the health of their children. Feed them simple, good, wholesome food that will nourish and make them strong. See that they are warmly clad. Keep them from exposure. Have them avoid unnecessary crowds in close, poorly ventilated, overheated rooms and halls. See that they have plenty of rest and sleep. Avoid late hours. Keep them home in the evenings and remain home to enjoy them. Teach them strictly to observe the Word of Wisdom which is God's law of health. You parents observe these rules yourselves, and keep the other commandments of the Lord. You bishops and presidents of stakes, first lead your people by example and then they will follow your precepts. Parents, prepare yourselves and your children for the times to come. So live, day by day, that you may with confidence, ask the blessings of health with which the Lord clothes those whom, living righteously, He delights to succor.

 

Message to the Youth

 

To the youth of the Church we repeat all the foregoing advice, but above all we plead with you to live clean, for the unclean life leads only to suffering, misery, and woe physically,-and spiritually it is the path to destruction. How glorious and near to the angels is youth that is clean; this youth has joy unspeakable here and eternal happiness hereafter. Sexual purity is youth's most precious possession; it is the foundation of all righteousness. Better dead, clean, than alive, unclean.

 

Times approach when we shall need all the health, strength, and spiritual power we can get to bear the afflictions that will come upon us.

 

Welfare Work

 

We renew the counsel given to the Saints from the days of Brigham Young until now,-be honest, truthful, industrious, frugal, thrifty. In the day of plenty, prepare for the day of scarcity. The principle of the fat and lean kine, is as applicable today as it was in the days when, on the banks of the Nile, Joseph interpreted Pharaoh's dream. Officials now warn us, and warn again, that scant days are coming.

 

We renew our counsel, and repeat our instructions. Let every Latter-day Saint that has land, produce some valuable, essential foodstuff thereon and then preserve it; or if he cannot produce an essential foodstuff, let him produce some other kind and exchange it for an essential foodstuff; let them who have no land of their own, and who have knowledge of farming and gardening, try to rent some, either by themselves or with others, and produce foodstuff thereon, and preserve it. Let those who have land produce enough extra to help their less fortunate brethren.

 

The Welfare plan should be carried out with redoubled energy that we may care for the worthy, needy poor and unfortunate, and many of us may hereafter enter that class who now feel we are secure from want.

 

As the Church has always urged since we came to the Valleys, so now we urge every Church householder to have a year's supply of essential foodstuffs ahead. This should, so far as possible, be produced by each householder and preserved by him. This course will not only relieve from any impending distress those households who so provide themselves, but will release just that much food to the general national stores of foodstuffs from which the public at large must be fed.

 

The utmost care should be taken to see that foodstuffs so produced and preserved by the householder, do not spoil, for that would be waste, and the Lord looks with disfavor upon waste. He has blessed His people with abundant crops; the promise for this year is most hopeful. The Lord is doing His part; He expects us to do ours.

 

False Political Isms

 

We again warn our people in America of the constantly increasing threat against our inspired Constitution and our free institutions set up under it. The same political tenets and philosophies that have brought war and terror in other parts of the world are at work amongst us in America. The proponents thereof are seeking to undermine our own form of government and to set up instead one of the forms of dictatorship now flourishing in other lands. These revolutionists are using a technique that is as old as the human race,-a fervid but false solicitude for the unfortunate over whom they thus gain mastery, and then enslave them.

 

They suit their approaches to the particular group they seek to deceive. Among the Latter-day Saints they speak of their philosophy and their plans under it, as an ushering in of the United Order. Communism and all other similar isms bear no relationship whatever to the United Order. They are merely the clumsy counterfeits which Satan always devises of the gospel plan. Communism debases the individual and makes him the enslaved tool of the state to whom he must look for sustenance and religion; the United Order exalts the individual, leaves him his property, according to his family, according to his circumstances and his wants and needs," (D&C 51:3) and provides a system by which he helps care for his less fortunate brethren; the United Order leaves every man free to choose his own religion as his conscience directs. Communism destroys man's God-given free agency; the United Order glorifies it. Latter-day Saints cannot be true to their faith and lend aid, encouragement, or sympathy to any of these false philosophies. They will prove snares to their feet.

 

Gospel of Love

 

The gospel of Christ is a gospel of love and peace, of patience and long suffering, of forbearance and forgiveness, of kindness and good deeds, of charity and brotherly love. Greed, avarice, base ambition, thirst for power, and unrighteous dominion over our fellow men, can have no place in the hearts of Latter-day Saints nor of God-fearing men everywhere. We of the Church must lead the life prescribed in the saying of the ancient prophet-warrior:

 

"I seek not for power, but to pull it down. I seek not for honor of the world, but for the glory of my God, and the freedom and welfare of my country." (Alma 60:36.)

 

Hate Must Be Abolished

 

Hate can have no place in the souls of the righteous. We must follow the commands of Christ Himself which declare the true life:

 

"Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;

 

"That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven." (Matt. 5:44-45.)

 

These principles must be instilled into the hearts of our children, taught to our youth, given by way of instruction to our vigorous manhood and womanhood, lived in very fact and deed by the aged, ripened in experience and wisdom. These are the principles which God enjoins upon all who teach, in whatever capacity or in whatever place. The Lord has declared that those who teach not their "children light and truth according to the commandments" shall be afflicted, the wicked one shall have power over them (D&C 93:42), and the sin shall be upon their heads (D&C 68:25). Woe will be the part of those who plant hate in the hearts of the youth, and of the people, for God will not hold them guiltless; they are sowing the wind, their victims will reap the whirlwinds. Hate is born of Satan; love is the offspring of God. We must drive out hate from our hearts, every one of us, and permit it not again to enter.

 

Mission of the Church

 

The Lord has established His Church in these latter-days that men might be called to repentance, to the salvation and exaltation of their souls. Time and time again He told the Prophet Joseph and those with him that "the field is white already to harvest." (D&C 4:4; 6:3; 11:3; 12:3; 14:3; 33:3, 7.) Over and over again He commanded them to preach nothing but repentance to this generation (D&C 6:9; 11:9, 14:8) finally declaring:

 

"And thou shalt declare glad tidings, yea, publish it upon the mountains, and upon every high place, and among every people that thou shalt be permitted to see.

 

"And thou shalt do it with all humility, trusting in me, reviling not against revilers.

 

"And of tenets thou shalt not talk, but thou shalt declare repentance and faith on the Savior, and remission of sins by baptism and by fire, yea, even the Holy Ghost.

 

"Behold, this is a great and the last commandment which I shall give unto you concerning this matter; for this shall suffice for thy daily walk, even unto the end of thy life.

 

"And misery thou shalt receive if thou wilt slight these counsels, yea, even the destruction of thyself and property." (D&C 19:29-33.)

 

These commands we must obey that men shall come to know God and Jesus Christ whom He sent, for "this is life eternal." (John 17:3.)

 

For this cause was the Church organized, the gospel again revealed in its fulness, the Priesthood of God again restored, with all its rights, powers, keys and functions. This is the mission of the Church. The divine commission given to the apostles of old (Matt. 28:18 ff.; Mark 16:15 ff.) has been repeated in this day, that the gospel shall be carried to all nations (D&C 38:33), unto the Jew and the gentile (D&C 18:26); it shall be declared with rejoicing (D&C 28:16); it shall roll to the ends of the earth (D&C 65:2); and it must be preached by us to whom the kingdom has been given. (D&C 84:76.) No act of ours or of the Church must interfere with this God-given mandate. The Lord will hold us to this high commission and exalted duty imposed by His commandment to us, when He said:

 

"And in nothing doth man offend God or against none is his wrath kindled, save those who confess not his hand in all things, and obey not his commandments. (D&C 59:21.)

 

We shall be excused from this divine commission, individually and as a Church, only if some power beyond our control shall prevent our obedience to God's commands, then they who hinder must bear the penalty. (D&C 124:49.) But to that point of hindrance, it is our bounden duty to carry on.

 

Sending of Missionaries

 

It is our duty, divinely imposed, to continue urgently and militantly to carry forward our missionary work. We must continue to call missionaries and send them out to preach the gospel, which was never more needed than now, which is the only remedy for the tragic ills that now afflict the world, and which alone can bring peace and brotherly love back amongst the peoples of the earth. We must continue to call to missionary work those who seem best able to perform it in these troublous and difficult days. Our duty under divine command imperatively demands this. We shall not knowingly call anyone for the purpose of having him evade military service, nor for the purpose of interfering with or hampering that service in any way, nor of putting any impediment in the way of government. Those would be unworthy motives for a missionary life. Our people have furnished and we expect them to continue to furnish their full quota for those purposes, but we see no alternative, until new rules are made by the government, but to continue to call the best and most effective men into missionary work, if they are available therefor.

 

Having in mind that the worldwide disaster in material and spiritual matters has brought vital and difficult problems to the nation and to the Church,-the nation because of need of manpower for the armed forces and defense works, and to the Church because of the imperative need it brings to us to employ in our missionary work the experience, testimony and faith possessed by our more mature brethren, we have instructed our bishops, presidents of branches, and presidents of missions, to confine until further notice, their recommendations of brethren for missionary service in the field, to those who on March 23, 1942, were seventies or high priests. Furthermore, in recommending these brethren, none but those who are and have been living worthily, should be chosen; and as to these, they should choose those only who have not received their notice of induction, who are not likely to receive it within a short time, and who have a real desire to do missionary work.

 

To preach the gospel, under ordination from the Priesthood of God, is a great privilege, to be enjoyed by those only who are thoroughly qualified and who are and have been strictly living the commandments and attending to their Church duties. Every bishop will carefully examine everyone whom he considers for a mission, to be sure he meets these requirements. No lukewarm or unworthy person should be recommended. The bishop must not in any way play favorites, thus avoiding giving just ground among the people of his ward for that unworthy, unrighteous thought, sometimes voiced by those whose sons have gone into the service, that because their sons have gone into the army, every other parent's son should go into the army, and that none should be sent on missions. This feeling has behind it thoughts that do not comport with the teachings of our Heavenly Father. Moreover, those going on missions are amenable to selection for army service so soon as they return. A mission exempts from army service only for the term of the mission.

 

Church and State

 

The Church stands for the separation of church and state. The church has no civil political functions. As the church may not assume the functions of the state, so the state may not assume the functions of the church. The church is responsible for and must carry on the work of the Lord, directing the conduct of its members, one towards the other, as followers of the lowly Christ, not forgetting the humble, the poor and needy, and those in distress, leading them all to righteous living and a spiritual life that shall bring them to salvation, exaltation, and eternal progression in wisdom, knowledge, understanding, and power.

 

Today, more than ever before in the history of the Church, we must bring the full force of righteous living of our people and the full influence of the spiritual power and responsibility of the holy Priesthood, to combat the evil forces which Satan has let loose among the peoples of the earth. We are in the midst of a desperate struggle between Truth and Error, and Truth will finally prevail.

 

The state is responsible for the civil control of its citizens or subjects, for their political welfare, and for the carrying forward of political policies, domestic and foreign, of the body politic. For these policies, their success or failure, the state is alone responsible, and it must carry its burdens. All these matters involve and directly affect Church members because they are part of the body politic, and members must give allegiance to their sovereign and render it loyal service when called thereto. But the Church itself, as such, has no responsibility for these policies, as to which it has no means of doing more than urging its members fully to render that loyalty to their country and to free institutions which the loftiest patriotism calls for.

 

Nevertheless, as a correlative of the principle of separation of the church and the state, themselves, there is an obligation running from every citizen or subject to the state. This obligation is voiced in that Article of Faith which declares:

 

"We believe in being subject to kings, presidents, rulers, and magistrates, in obeying, honoring, and sustaining the law."

 

For one hundred years, the Church has been guided by the following principles:

 

"We believe that governments were instituted of God for the benefit of man; and that he holds men accountable for their acts in relation to them, both in making laws and administering them, for the good and safety of society.

 

"We believe that no government can exist in peace, except such laws are framed and held inviolate as will secure to each individual the free exercise of conscience, the right and control of property, and the protection of life.

 

"We believe that all governments necessarily require civil officers and magistrates to enforce the laws of the same; and that such as will administer the law in equity and justice should be sought for and upheld by the voice of the people if a republic, or the will of the sovereign.

 

"We believe that religion is instituted of God; and that men are amenable to him, and to him only, for the exercise of it, unless their religious opinions prompt them to infringe upon the rights and liberties of others; but we do not believe that human law has a right to interfere in prescribing rules of worship to bind the consciences of men, nor dictate forms for public or private devotion; that the civil magistrate should restrain crime, but never control conscience; should punish guilt, but never suppress the freedom of the soul.

 

"We believe that all men are bound to sustain and uphold the respective governments in which they reside, while protected in their inherent and inalienable rights by the laws of such governments; and that sedition and rebellion are unbecoming every citizen thus protected, and should be punished accordingly; and that all governments have a right to enact such laws as in their own judgments are best calculated to secure the public interest; at the same time, however, holding sacred the freedom of conscience.

 

"We believe that every man should be honored in his station, rulers and magistrates as such, being placed for the protection of the innocent and the punishment of the guilty; and that to the laws all men owe respect and deference, as without them peace and harmony would be supplanted by anarchy and terror; human laws being instituted for the express purpose of regulating our interests as individuals and nations, between man and man; and divine laws given of heaven, prescribing rules on spiritual concerns, for faith and worship, both to be answered by man to his Maker….

 

"We believe that murder, treason, robbery, theft, and the breach of the general peace, in all respects, should be punished according to their criminality and their tendency to evil among men, by the laws of that government in which the offense is committed…. “(D&C 134:1-6, 8.)

 

Church Membership and Army Service

 

Obedient to these principles, the members of the Church have always felt under obligation to come to the defense of their country when a call to arms was made; on occasion the Church has prepared to defend its own members.

 

In the days of Nauvoo, the Nauvoo Legion was formed, having in view possible armed defense of the Saints against mob violence. Following our expulsion from Nauvoo, the Mormon Battalion was recruited by the national government for service in the war with Mexico. When Johnston's army was sent to Utah in 1857 as the result of malicious misrepresentations as to the actions and attitude of the territorial officers and the people, we prepared and used measures of force to prevent the entry of the army into the valleys. During the early years in Utah, forces were raised and used to fight the Indians. In the war with Spain, members of the Church served with the armed forces of the United States, with distinction and honor. In the World War, the Saints of America and of European countries served loyally their respective governments, on both sides of the conflict. Likewise in the present war, righteous men of the Church in both camps have died, some with great heroism, for their own country's sake. In all this our people have but served loyally the country of which they were citizens or subjects under the principles we have already stated. We have felt honored that our brethren have died nobly for their country; the Church has been benefited by their service and sacrifice.

 

Nevertheless, we have not forgotten that on Sinai, God commanded "Thou shalt not kill;" nor that in this dispensation the Lord has repeatedly reiterated that command. He has said:

 

"And now, behold, I speak unto the church. Thou shalt not kill; and he that kills shall not have forgiveness in this world, nor in the world to come.

 

"And again, I say, thou shalt not kill; but he that killeth shall die." (D&C 42:18-19; and see 59:6.)

 

At another time the Lord commanded that murderers should "be delivered up and dealt with according to the laws of the land; for remember that he hath no forgiveness." (Ibid 79.) So also when land was to be obtained in Zion, the Lord said:

 

"Wherefore, the land of Zion shall not be obtained but by purchase or by blood, otherwise there is none inheritance for you.

 

"And if by purchase, behold you are blessed;

 

"And if by blood, as you are forbidden to shed blood, lo, your enemies are upon you, and ye shall be scourged from city to city, and from synagogue to synagogue, and but few shall stand to receive an inheritance." (D&C 63:29-31.)

 

But all these commands, from Sinai down, run in very terms against individuals as members of society, as well as members of the Church, for one man must not kill another as Cain killed Abel; they also run against the Church as in the case of securing land in Zion, because Christ's Church should not make war, for the Lord is a Lord of peace. He has said to us in this dispensation:

 

"Therefore, renounce war and proclaim peace…. " (D&C 98:16.)

 

Thus the Church is and must be against war. The Church itself cannot wage war, unless and until the Lord shall issue new commands. It cannot regard war as a righteous means of settling international disputes; these should and could be settled-the nations agreeing-by peaceful negotiation and adjustment.

 

But the Church membership are citizens or subjects of sovereignties over which the Church has no control. The Lord Himself has told us to "befriend that law which is the constitutional law of the land":

 

"And now, verily I say unto you concerning the laws of the land, it is my will that my people should observe to do all things whatsoever I command them.

 

"And that law of the land which is constitutional, supporting that principle of freedom in maintaining rights and privileges, belongs to all mankind, and is justifiable before me.

 

"Therefore, I, the Lord, justify you, and your brethren of my church, in befriending that law which is the constitutional law of the land;

 

"And as pertaining to law of man, whatsoever is more or less than this cometh of evil." (D&C 98:4-7.)

 

While by its terms this revealed word related more especially to this land of America, nevertheless the principles announced are worldwide in their application, and they are specifically addressed to "you" (Joseph Smith), "and your brethren of my church." When, therefore, constitutional law, obedient to these principles, calls the manhood of the Church into the armed service of any country to which they owe allegiance, their highest civic duty requires that they meet that call. If, hearkening to that call and obeying those in command over them, they shall take the lives of those who fight against them, that will not make of them murderers, nor subject them to the penalty that God has prescribed for those who kill, beyond the principle to be mentioned shortly. For it would be a cruel God that would punish His children as moral sinners for acts done by them as the innocent instrumentalities of a sovereign whom He had told them to obey and whose will they were powerless to resist.

 

God Is at the Helm

 

The whole world is in the midst of a war that seems the worst of all time. This Church is a worldwide Church. Its devoted members are in both camps. They are the innocent war instrumentalities of their warring sovereignties. On each side they believe they are fighting for home, and country, and freedom. On each side, our brethren pray to the same God, in the same name, for victory. Both sides cannot be wholly right; perhaps neither is without wrong. God will work out in His own due time and in His own sovereign way the justice and right of the conflict, but He will not hold the innocent instrumentalities of the war, our brethren in arms, responsible for the conflict. This is a major crisis in the world-life of man. God is at the helm.

 

Righteous Suffer with Wicked

 

But there is an eternal law that rules war and those who engage in it. It was given when, Peter having struck off the ear of Malchus, the servant of the High Priest, Jesus reproved him, saying:

 

"Put up again thy sword into his place: for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword." (Matt. 26:52.)

 

The Savior thus laid down a general principle upon which He placed no limitations as to time, place, cause, or people involved. He repeated it in this dispensation when he told the people if they tried to secure the land of Zion by blood, then "Lo, your enemies are upon you." This is a universal law, for force always begets force; it is the law of "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth" (Exod. 21:24; Lev. 24:20); it is the law of the unrighteous and wicked but it operates against the righteous who may be involved.

 

Mormon, recording the war of revenge by the Nephites, against the Lamanites, pronounced another great law:

 

"But, behold, the judgments of God will overtake the wicked; and it is by the wicked that the wicked are punished; for it is the wicked that stir up the hearts of the children of men unto bloodshed." (Morm. 4:5.)

 

But, we repeat, in this war of the wicked, the righteous suffer also. Moroni, mistakenly reproving Pahoran "for sitting upon his throne in a state of thoughtless stupor, while his enemies were spreading the work of death around him, yea, while they were murdering thousands of his brethren," said to Pahoran:

 

"Do ye suppose that, because so many of your brethren have been killed it is because of their wickedness? I say unto you, if ye have supposed this ye have supposed in vain; for I say unto you, there are many who have fallen by the sword; and behold it is to your condemnation;

 

"For the Lord suffereth the righteous to be slain that his justice and judgment may come upon the wicked; therefore ye need not suppose that the righteous are lost because they are slain; but behold, they do enter into the rest of the Lord their God." (Al. 60:7, 12-13.)

 

In this terrible war now waging, thousands of our righteous young men in all parts of the world and in many countries are subject to a call into the military service of their own countries. Some of these, so serving, have already been called back to their heavenly home; others will almost surely be called to follow. But "behold," as Moroni said, the righteous of them who serve and are slain "do enter into the rest of the Lord their God," and of them the Lord has said "those that die in me shall not taste of death, for it shall be sweet unto them." (D&C 42:46.) Their salvation and exaltation in the world to come will be secure. That in their work of destruction they will be striking at their brethren will not be held against them. That sin, as Moroni of old said, is to the condemnation of those who "sit in their places of power in a state of thoughtless stupor," those rulers in the world who in a frenzy of hate and lust for unrighteous power and dominion over their fellow men, have put into motion eternal forces they do not comprehend and cannot control. God, in His own due time, will pass sentence upon them.

 

"Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord. (Rom. 12:19.)

 

Message to Men in Service

 

To our young men who go into the service, no matter whom they serve or where, we say live clean, keep the commandments of the Lord, pray to Him constantly to preserve you in truth and righteousness, live as you pray, and then whatever betides you the Lord will be with you and nothing will happen to you that will not be to the honor and glory of God and to your salvation and exaltation. There will come into your hearts from the living of the pure life you pray for, a joy that will pass your powers of expression or understanding. The Lord will be always near you; He will comfort you; you will feel His presence in the hour of your greatest tribulation; He will guard and protect you to the full extent that accords with His all-wise purpose. Then, when the conflict is over and you return to your homes, having lived the righteous life, how great will be your happiness-whether you be of the victors or of the vanquished-that you have lived as the Lord commanded. You will return so disciplined in righteousness that thereafter all Satan's wiles and stratagems will leave you untouched. Your faith and testimony will be strong beyond breaking. You will be looked up to and revered as having passed through the fiery furnace of trial and temptation and come forth unharmed. Your brethren will look to you for counsel, support, and guidance. You will be the anchors to which thereafter the youth of Zion will moor their faith in man.

 

To you brethren and sisters who make up the body of the Church we send again our greetings and our blessings. We are grateful to our Heavenly Father for your loyalty, your devotion, and your righteousness. We love and bless you. We are grateful for your faithfulness in your tithes and offerings, the greatest in the last year in the whole history of the Church.

 

We remind you that as the Lord said to ancient Israel, so He says to us, in an eternal principle:

 

"Bring ye all the tithes into the storehouse, that there may be meat in mine house, and prove me now herewith, saith the Lord of hosts, if I will not open you the windows of heaven, and pour you out a blessing, that there shall not be room enough to receive it.

 

"And I will rebuke the devourer for your sakes, and he shall not destroy the fruits of your ground; neither shall your vine cast her fruit before the time in the field, saith the Lord of hosts.

 

"And all nations shall call you blessed: for ye shall be a delightsome land, saith the Lord of hosts." (Mal. 3:10-12.)

 

We give thanks and praise to our Heavenly Father for the unselfish and righteous service of the officers of the stakes, of the wards, of the auxiliaries, of the Priesthood, of the missionaries, and of every man and woman who is helping to advance the cause of Truth. We give our blessing and love to all of you. We claim all of you as fellow servants of the Lord. To our brethren of the General Authorities,-the Twelve and their Assistants, the Acting Presiding Patriarch, the First Council of the Seventy, and the Presiding Bishopric-we give our love and trust. We thank them and our Heavenly Father for their loyal support, their faith, their righteous works, which they carry on with an eye single to the glory of God and to the progress of His work, so magnifying in righteousness their callings.

 

We exhort all the Saints to remember the great commandment which Jesus gave:

 

"Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.

 

"This is the first and great commandment.

 

"And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself.

 

"On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets." (Matt. 22:37-40.)

 

And as King Benjamin, the Nephite prophet-king, said to his people:

 

Learn that when ye are in the service of your fellow beings ye are only in the service of your God." (Mos. 2:17.)

 

May the Lord preserve the officers and the body of the Church in health and strength, increase our faith and our testimonies, endow us all with wisdom and understanding beyond measure, that we may all so live that when we are called home we may be saved and exalted in the celestial kingdom.

 

Our Heavenly Father: Hear us in our petitions before Thee: Let nothing stand betwixt us and Thee and Thy blessings; work out Thy purposes speedily; drive hate from the souls of men, that peace and brotherly love may again come to the earth and rule the hearts of Thy children, that nations may again live together in amity. Watch tenderly over The children in all lands; bless therein the sick and afflicted, care for those in distress; help us, their brethren bearing The Priesthood, to feed the hungry, clothe the naked, give shelter to those who have no homes; comfort, our Heavenly Father, with the full sweetness of Thy Holy Spirit, those who mourn, we humbly pray in the name of Jesus Christ, Amen.

 

 

Elder Ezra Taft Benson’s reported his mission to Europe along with Pres. West and Pres. Max Zimmer in the April 1947 General Conference.  The saints lived on faith when everything else was destroyed.

 

 

The Church was prepared to help while the world was not prepared, Dan 2:44.

 

Elder Max Zimmer

 

Former Acting President of the West German Mission and Also of the Swiss Mission

 

My brethren and sisters, this makes me very humble to stand before such a large audience, realizing my poor English and feeling how difficult it is to express my thoughts and feelings in the language which I have at my command.

 

I want to take this opportunity, first of all, to bring you the greetings and love of the eight thousand saints of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in the West German Mission, and more especially to bring their thankfulness and to express my own appreciation of the wonderful help you have rendered to these poor saints over there through the Church Welfare plan.

 

As you all know, these saints have been faithful during the war. There may have been a few exceptions, but they only confirm the rule. A vast majority have been very faithful and true to the Church. They have suffered much. When I think of the change within a week or so to me, it is like being in another world. After having traveled about eighteen months through about a hundred destroyed cities, and then coming to this beautiful city of Salt Lake, entirely untouched by the war, with happy people all over, people who are abundantly blessed by our Heavenly Father, it is truly like being in another world.

 

The Latter-day Saints in the West German Mission, over which it was my privilege to preside about a year, even though in many cases they have been stripped almost of every earthly possession and in many cases they have lost loved ones, they were happy because they had one thing in their possession which means more to them than anything else,—their testimony of the divinity of this great work, their positive knowledge that the heavens have been opened to the Prophet Joseph Smith, that he was a chosen servant of the Lord to restore the true gospel of Jesus Christ and that this work is to prepare for the second coming of Christ. This testimony was more to our saints in Germany than anything else, and those who lost almost everything held that they still were not poor for they have the knowledge of the gospel. They realize that.

 

So far as temporal conditions are concerned, they have suffered a great deal but now since shipments of Church Welfare have arrived there, the Church has contributed very liberally, and I may say in regard to the food situation, our saints in Germany are well taken care of. So far as clothing and shoes, underwear and other things are concerned, as Brother Stover has mentioned in his letter, they are still suffering, but I am happy to know that even such things are on the way and in a short time they can be distributed among our saints.

 

I only wish, brethren and sisters, you had had opportunity to be in our fast meetings, for instance, after these shipments arrived and were distributed, and to see the happy faces, to feel the spirit of thankfulness and appreciation of those who have been benefitted by your liberal contributions through the Church Welfare plan. I never realized so much that we had one great brotherhood as I did when these shipments came in. We always knew that we are all brethren and sisters, all children of our Heavenly Father, but now we have experienced that we have been blessed with the manifestation of this spirit of brotherhood and even among our friends who are non-members of the Church, I think this has been the most impressive thought during the last year, that the Mormons are really one great family, that when they say Brother and Sister to one another, they mean what they say. It is not a common thing with them; it is practical Christianity. Many times in the mission field we have discussed this question as to whether or not Christianity has failed, especially during the past ten years. How happy we are to be in a position to give our testimony from our own experience that the true Church really practices Christianity as this Church has done. I am very thankful, more than I can express, for this manifestation of brotherhood in this great Church.

 

I am grateful also for the blessing of association with men like the General Authorities of the Church. I was in London a week ago and had the privilege of meeting President Alma Sonne. I have known President Benson, I have traveled with him, I have been with him in high places, in his interviews with General McNarney in Frankfurt, and with General Clay in Berlin. I listened to the conversations he had with these men and I never had the impression that he was inferior to them, but he had some influence with him which was above the spirit and influence of these men. I know that the Lord has been with him; otherwise he could not have done what he has done in the re-opening of the European Mission, overcoming so many obstacles and handicaps and putting us on our feet again in these missions in Europe.

 

I know without doubt that this is the Church of Jesus Christ, that the men at the head of this Church are really what we believe they are, brothers and apostles of the Lord Jesus Christ, in a real sense of the word, which we know from the New Testament and from the revelations of God. I know that this gospel of Jesus Christ makes men and women happy if they obey the commandments of the Lord. I know that one of the best things we can do in this Church is to cultivate the spirit and the attitude of brotherhood, that we may continue to be a great Church of brothers and sisters, realizing that we are all children of our Heavenly Father, trying to help each other and in this way trying to come nearer to our Heavenly Father.

 

That this may be the case more in the future even than in the past is my humble prayer in the name of Jesus Christ. Amen.

 

President George Albert Smith:

 

You have just listened to Brother Max Zimmer, Acting Mission President of the Swiss Mission during the war, and during the past year Acting Mission President of the West German Mission, who left London about a week ago on his way here. Hearing these humble men who have come from other lands and feeling of their spirit and realizing what a change has come to them, how grateful we ought to be for our homes in the valleys of these great mountains, far from the sorrows and distresses of those destroyed buildings, wrecked families and sorrowful people, many of whom may never again know what it is to be happy while they live in mortality.

 

 

(Elder Max Zimmer, Conference Report, April 1947, First Day—Morning Meeting 30.)

 

 

 

 

David O. McKay

 

October 21, 2004

 

 

 

President Smith died just before Conference; President McKay was sustained after the funeral.

 

 

As the 1951 April Conference approached, Church President George Albert Smith, who had been ill for months, was taken home from the hospital. He preferred to die in his own house. His counselors, J. Reuben Clark, Jr., and David O. McKay, visited his bedside on April 2. The dying man, who was surrounded by weeping daughters and others, did not remember them. Two days later, on his eighty-first birthday, he died. His daughter, remembering how much her father had wanted to attend April Conference, said that now he could be there, unencumbered by a decrepit body.

 

The fourteen apostles, including the two counselors from the dissolved First Presidency, met next morning in the Temple to talk about the funeral arrangements. David O. McKay, the senior apostle, occupied the first oak chair in the semicircle arranged about the blue altar. J. Reuben Clark, Jr., assumed his place in the sixth chair. The chairs for the Presidency stood empty. As the senior apostle spoke, a strange feeling came over Elder Kimball. He saw David O. McKay in his majesty and power. "I saw him as the President of the Church.... There was no doubt in my mind. It was a soul-satisfying feeling. It was hardly a light-it was more like a sudden flood of warmth and into my mind came the thought: 'A PROPHET'S MANTLE.' "The experience stood for him as a testimony that David O. McKay was the Lord's choice. But beyond that, it seemed a special mark of favor to himself. "It gave me the feeling that perhaps the Lord might be pleased to a small extent with my work, attitudes and myself to be so kind to me."

 

On Sunday afternoon the apostles met again in the Temple. Joseph Fielding Smith, second in seniority, proposed that David O. McKay be President of the Church. Stephen L Richards, third in seniority, seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. President McKay then chose Stephen L Richards as first counselor and J. Reuben Clark, Jr., as second counselor. There was stunned silence for a moment. Elder Clark had been first counselor to two presidents, for seventeen long years. Then Joseph Fielding Smith moved approval and the apostles voted unanimously to sustain the President in his choice.

 

Not until we started down the steps of the temple did I come to realize that I was not alone in my bewilderment and devastation. All the others of the Twelve seemed to be alike stunned. We had been wholly unprepared for this shock. President Clark had stood and accepted this call and in this order like a god. What a man! What fortitude! What courage and self control! What self mastery! How could any mortal take a blow like that and stand? But he did.

 

I had slipped into the room where he was changing his clothes and whispered to him with my warmest feelings and a tight hand-clasp: "President Clark, my love and admiration for you knows no bounds." This was all I could say. I think he knew my heart was breaking for him. We had all re-dressed in silence. We walked back to the office building numb. The other brethren from Brother Lee down came together at the corner of the building and commiserated together. We realized that the President had a right to choose his counselors in or out of the Twelve, but we had not expected this arrangement. We knew that nothing incorrect had been done, but our hearts were breaking for that stalwart who for two regimes had carried the major load.

 

The next morning at the Tabernacle, in a specially convened solemn assembly as President Clark presented for sustaining vote each General Authority, Elder Kimball could detect no trace of self-pity or complaint. In his remarks President Clark gave ringing testimony that David O. McKay was the chosen prophet of God and said: "In the service of the Lord, it is not where you serve but how. In The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, one takes the place to which one is duly called, which place one neither seeks nor declines." Elder Kimball said in evaluation: "He did more in his perfect reactions perhaps to establish in the minds of this people the true spirit of subjection of the individual to the good of the work, more than could be done in thousands of sermons. How I honor and appreciate and admire him. Surely he is one of God's greatest noblemen!"

 

President McKay spoke feelingly to the assembled members and explained there was no rift, as some might suppose, but the greatest of harmony. He had prayed and prayed about the matter and, having the privilege of choosing, had felt the arrangement of his two counselors to be right and hoped the people and the Twelve would sustain him. He spoke and bore testimony with emotion unusual for him, and an additional testimony came to Elder Kimball that he was the Lord's prophet on earth.

 

 

(Edward L. Kimball and Andrew E. Kimball, Jr., Spencer W. Kimball: Twelfth President of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1977], 267.)

 

 

President David O. McKay:

 

Before proceeding further with the exercises of this session, I am prompted to say a word in answer to a question which undoubtedly is in every one of your minds. Particularly to those not members of the Church, and to members of the Church as well, may I call attention to the policy of the Church with regard to choosing of counselors.

 

A PRESIDENT NAMES HIS COUNSELORS

 

When a President is chosen and sustained (that includes the president of the Aaronic Priesthood who is the Bishop of a Ward, also Presidents of quorums or superintendents or presidents of auxiliaries) it is the practice of the Church to let the president name his counselors.

 

Anticipating that the Council of the Twelve would grant to me that same privilege, I thoughtfully and prayerfully considered what two men would be most helpful and most contributive to the advancement of the Church. The impression came, I am sure, directly from Him whose Church this is, and who presides over it, that the two counselors whom you have this day approved should be the other members of the quorum of the First Presidency. Both are members of the Council of the Twelve, though counselors might have been chosen from High Priests outside that presiding body.

 

I chose these two members from the Council of the Twelve—two men with whom I have labored closely for many years, whose worth, whose ability I know. I have been associated with Elder Richards directly in Church affairs and in presiding positions for over thirty years. I have been associated with President Clark in two quorums of the First Presidency for over sixteen years. With these and other facts in mind, the question arose as to the order they should occupy in this new quorum.

 

Each man I love. Each man is capable in his particular lines, and particularly with respect to the welfare and advancement of the Kingdom of God.

 

SENIORITY IN THE COUNCIL OF TWELVE

 

I realized that there would be a question in the minds of some as to which one of the two should be chosen as first counselor. That question resolved itself in my mind first as to the order of precedence, seniority in the Council of the Twelve Apostles. That should make no difference according to the practice of the Church, because members of the Council had heretofore been chosen irrespective of the position a member occupied in the Council of the Twelve. And, as I have already said, high Priests have been chosen even as first counselors who were not members of the Council.

 

I felt that one guiding principle in this choice would be to follow the seniority in the Council. These two men were sitting in their places in that presiding body in the Church, and I felt impressed that it would be advisable to continue that same seniority in the new quorum of the First Presidency. I repeat, not as an established policy, but because it seemed advisable in view of my close relationship to these two choice leaders.

 

TWO COUNSELORS COORDINATE

 

Now I mention this because we do not want any member in this Church, nor any man or woman listening in to harbor the thought for a moment that there has been any rift between the two counselors who sustained President Smith in the Quorum of the First Presidency, and President Grant for the years that we were together with that inspired leader. Neither should you feel that there is any demotion. President Clark is a wonderful servant. You have had demonstrated here this morning his ability in carrying out details, and he is just that efficient in everything pertaining to the work.

 

You should understand further, that in the counselorship of the Quorum of the First Presidency these two men are coordinate in authority, in love, and confidence, in freedom to make suggestions, and recommendations, and in their responsibility not only to the Quorum but also to the Lord Jesus Christ and to the people generally.

 

They are two great men. I love them both, and say God bless them, and give you the assurance that there will be harmony and love and confidence in the Quorum of the First Presidency as you have sustained them today.

 

 

(President David O. Mckay:, Conference Report, April 1951, Third Day—Solemn Assembly 150.)

 

There was tremendous growth in the Church.  The 12 were sent out to tell the saints to build up Zion where they lived; they don’t need to come to the US, stay where you are.

 

Bruce discussed sin of commission (curse attached to it) and sin of omission (no blessing attached to it), marry outside the temple will receive no blessing, didn’t fulfill the law to receive a blessing.

 

How does apostasy come about? By neglect of duty, failing to keep in our souls the spirit of prayer, of obedience to the principles of the Gospel; by failure to pay an honest tithing, or to observe the word of wisdom, and to absent one's self from sacrament meetings where we have been commanded to go and renew our covenants. Apostasy comes through the sins of omission as well as through the sins of commission. Immorality is a deadly sin and those who are guilty, if they do not repent, will lose the spirit and deny the faith. Apostasy does not come upon an individual suddenly, but it is a gradual growth in which darkness through sin crowds out the spirit of light from the soul. When a man who was once enlightened loses the Spirit of truth, the darkness which takes its place is overwhelming. Alma gives us a good example of this in teaching Zeezrom. (Alma 12:9-11.)

 

"Strange as it may appear at first thought, yet it is no less strange than true, that notwithstanding all the professed determination to live godly, apostates after turning from the faith of Christ, unless they have speedily repented, have sooner or later fallen into the snares of the wicked one, and have been left destitute of the Spirit of God, to manifest their wickedness in the eyes of multitudes. From apostates the faithful have received the severest persecutions. Judas was rebuked and immediately betrayed his Lord into the hands of his enemies, because Satan entered into him. There is a superior intelligence bestowed upon such as obey the Gospel with full purpose of heart, which, if sinned against, the apostate is left naked and destitute of the Spirit of God, and he is, in truth, nigh unto cursing, and his end is to be burned. When once that light which was in them is taken from them, they become as much darkened as they were previously enlightened, and then, no marvel, if all their power should be enlisted against the truth, and they, Judas like, seek the destruction of those who were their greatest benefactors." ("Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith," p. 67.)

 

 

(Joseph Fielding Smith, Church History and Modern Revelation, 4 vols. [Salt Lake City: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 1946-1949], 3: 150.)

 

 

Apostates and Apostatize

 

The word apostasy does not appear in the Doctrine and Covenants; however, apostate (86:3), apostates (85:2), and apostatize (85:2, 11) are mentioned. Webster defines apostasy as "a renunciation or abandonment of a former loyalty." An apostate is one who follows such a course. "How does apostasy come about?" asked President Joseph Fielding Smith. "By neglect of duty, failing to keep in our souls the spirit of prayer, [dis]obedience to the principles of the Gospel; by failure to pay an honest tithing, or to observe the word of wisdom, and to absent one's self from sacrament meetings where we have been commanded to go and renew our covenants. Apostasy comes through the sins of omission as well as through sins of commission. Immorality is a deadly sin, and those who are guilty, if they do not repent, will lose the spirit and deny the faith. Apostasy does not come upon an individual suddenly, but it is a gradual growth in which darkness through sin crowds out the spirit of light from the soul. When a man who was once enlightened loses the Spirit of truth, the darkness which takes its place is overwhelming." (CHMR 2:125.)

 

Elder Thomas E. McKay quipped, "We do not lose our faith from a blowout-just by slow leaks" (En., Feb. 1971, p. 80). Criticism of Church leaders, according to Joseph Smith, was a sure sign one was "in the high road to apostasy" (TPJS, 156-57). "The basic cause of apostasy is sin," said Elder Bruce R. McConkie. "Men leave the Church because they are sensual and carnal.... The basic reason for rebellion against the truth is a desire to enjoy the lusts of the flesh. The choice is not between doctrinal concepts but between differing ways of life." (DNTC 3:426-27.)

 

 

(Hoyt W. Brewster, Jr., Doctrine and Covenants Encyclopedia [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1988], 21.)

 

October 1942 1st Presidency message on Parenthood, it’s on the website.  Test of Godhood is parenthood, it is a serious responsibility. 

 

President McKay April 1969 Conference address, we reviewed it in class.

 

President David O. McKay

 

 (Read by his son Robert R. McKay)

 

My beloved brethren and sisters: My soul is deeply stirred this morning, due, I am sure, to a combination of circumstances and experiences. Never have I been so thankful for the blessings of the Lord, and for the faith and prayers of the membership of the Church. I am thankful for the restoration of the gospel and for the glorious message to all the world that accompanied that restoration: that God lives and that his Beloved Son Jesus Christ is the Redeemer and Savior of the world, that we are his children, and that he has given us a plan by which we may return to his presence as resurrected, immortal beings.

 

Progress of the Church

 

11509I am grateful for the outstanding progress the Church has made during the past year; for the united and unstinted support given by the General Authorities and general officers of the Church; for the loyalty, faith, and devotion of the general auxiliary boards, of the officers in stakes, quorums, wards, missions, and of the Church membership in general. Most of all, I am grateful for the assurance we have of the Lord's guidance and overruling power.

 

I extend to all present in this historic Tabernacle—our special visitors, governmental and educational leaders, Regional Representatives, our stake, ward, and auxiliary officers and teachers from far and near—and to friends and members tuned in by radio and television my heartfelt greetings and welcome to this one hundred thirty-ninth conference of the Church.

 

Mankind's welfare

 

During the past months I have been most apprehensive of mankind's welfare in a world of tribulation and of false ideals. With the increase in crime, the disrespect for law and order the ever-increasing divorce rate, resulting in broken homes; the immorality, with all its attendant evils; the precious principles associated with man's freedom threatened with repudiation, if not abandonment, it is time that men and women the world over should become more thoughtful, more prayerful, more earnest than ever before in seeking the causes of this world's disaster, and bravely and heroically choose a better course of life.

 

This is a time when mankind should turn their thoughts to the teachings of Christ, our Lord and Savior, and in larger numbers than the world has heretofore witnessed conform thereto their attitudes and actions. Unless multitudes of men and women so change their hearts and lives, the world will continue to be in turmoil, and our present civilization be threatened with disintegration.

 

Need for more godliness

 

It is a deplorable but recognizable fact that men's hearts all too generally are turned from and not toward God. Self-promotion, not God's glorification, is the motivating factor in most people's lives. Irreverence is all too manifest.

 

The world needs more godliness and less godlessness; more self-discipline, less self-indulgence; more power to say with Christ, "Father . . . not my will, but thine, be done." (Luke 22:42.) Christ came to bring peace. Rejection of his way of life has made strife and contention rampant. Man, not the Lord, has brought deadly conflicts and subsequent misery. Wars spring from wickedness of unrighteous leaders. Not until freedom triumphs and a just peace comes may we hope for the end of wars and for goodwill among men.

 

Today, when these facts are so strikingly manifest, let all sincere men recognize the evil conditions that have caused wars, and resolve with God's help to banish them forever. There must come a victory of right and freedom over iniquity and oppression; I repeat, war will never be vanquished until men change their hearts and establish new ideals.

 

Home, the strength of a nation

 

An essential, fundamental element in the building and in the perpetuity of a great people is the home. The strength of a nation, especially of a republican nation, is in the intelligent and well- ordered homes of the people. In the well-ordered home we may experience on earth a taste of heaven. It is there that the babe in a mother's caress first experiences a sense of security, finds in the mother's kiss the first realization of affection, discovers in mother's sympathy and tenderness the first assurance that there is love in the world.

 

I remember that during World War II conditions made it necessary that I share a Pullman car with 40 soldier boys. They were gentlemen, and a credit to any nation. In the course of conversation, one of them remarked to me: "My dad's hair is white too." Then he added in a tone that expressed the depth of his feeling, "How I should like to see that old gray head this morning]" He and his companions were en route for an encampment to complete their training before embarking for duty overseas. They had enlisted to defend not only the free agency of man, but the rights and sanctity of home and loved ones. Such an affection for home and loved ones as felt by that soldier boy will make death preferable to surrender to an enemy who would destroy home and all that American soldiers hold dear.

 

Seeking the pleasure of conjugality without a willingness to assume the responsibilities of rearing a family is one of the onslaughts that now batter at the structure of the American home. Intelligence and mutual consideration should be ever-present factors in determining the coming of children to the home.

 

Intelligent home building

 

It is important for young people to realize that intelligent home building begins with a young man and a young girl in their teens. Often the health of children, if a couple be blessed with such, depends upon the actions of parents before marriage. In the press, from the pulpit, and particularly in the home, there should ring more frequently the message that in their youth boys and girls are laying the foundation for their future happiness or misery. Every young man, particularly, should prepare for the responsibility of fatherhood by keeping himself physically clean, that he might enter into that responsibility not as a coward or deceiver, but as one honorable and fit to found a home. The young man who, in unfitness, takes upon himself the responsibility of fatherhood is worse than a deceiver. The future happiness of his wife and children depends upon his life in youth.

 

Let us also teach girls that motherhood is divine, for when we touch the creative part of life, we enter into the realm of divinity. It is important, therefore, that young womanhood realize the necessity of keeping their bodies clean and pure, that their children might enter the world unhampered by sin and disease. An unshackled birth and an inheritance of noble character are the greatest blessings of childhood. No mother has the right to shackle a child through life for what seems in youth to be a pleasant pastime or her night to indulge in harmful drugs and other sinful practices. Those who are to be the mothers of the race should at least so live as to bear children who are not burdened from birth by sickness, weakness, or deformity, because the parents, in fiery youth, as Shakespeare said, "with unbashful forehead woo the means of weakness and debility."

 

Unchastity a dominant evil

 

A dominant evil of the world today is unchastity. I repeat what appeared over the signature of President Joseph F. Smith while he was living: "No more loathsome cancer disfigures the body and soul of society today than the frightful affliction of sexual sin. It vitiates the very fountains of life, and bequeaths its foul effects to the yet unborn as a legacy of death." (The Improvement Era, Vol. 20, p. 739.) He who is unchaste in young manhood is untrue to a trust given him by the parents of the girl; and she who is unchaste in maidenhood is untrue to her future husband and lays the foundation of unhappiness, suspicion, and discord in the home. Do not worry about those teachers who talk about inhibitions. Just keep in mind this eternal truth that chastity is a virtue to be prized as one of life's noblest achievements. It contributes to the virility of manhood. It is the crowning virtue of womanhood, and every red-blooded man knows that is true. It is a chief factor to a happy home. There is no loss of prestigein maintaining in a dignified way the standards of the Church. You can be in this world and not "of the world." Keep your chastity above everything else! God has commanded that we be chaste: "Thou shalt not commit adultery!" said the Lord at Sinai. (See Exod. 20:14.)

 

Degenerating forces in the world are rampant, but they can be resisted if youth will cherish right thoughts and aspire to high ideals. The age-old conflict between truth and error is being waged with accelerating fury, and at the present hour error seems to be gaining the upper hand. Increasing moral turpitude and widespread disregard for the principles of honor and integrity are undermining influences in social, political, and business life.

 

Marriage ordained of God

 

The exalted view of marriage as held by the Church is given expressively in five words found in the forty-ninth section of the Doctrine and Covenants: "marriage is ordained of God." (D&C 49:15.)

 

That revelation was given in 1831 when Joseph Smith was only 25 years of age. Considering the circumstances under which it was given, we find in it another example among hundreds of others corroborative of the fact that he was inspired of the Lord. Before us are assembled thousands of presiding officers in stakes, wards, quorums, and auxiliaries, to whom we say, it is your duty and mine to uphold the lofty conception of marriage as given in this revelation, and to guard against encroaching dangers that threaten to lower the standard of the ideal home.

 

It is said that the best and noblest lives are those which are set toward high ideals. Truly no higher ideal regarding marriage can be cherished by young people than to look upon it as a divine institution. In the minds of the young, such a standard is a protection to them in courtship, an ever-present influence inducing them to refrain from doing anything that may prevent their going to the temple to have their love made perfect in an enduring and eternal union. It will lead them to seek divine guidance in the selection of their companions, upon the wise choice of whom their life's happiness here and hereafter is largely dependent. It makes their hearts pure and good; it lifts them up to their Father in heaven. Such joys are within the reach of most men and women if high ideals of marriage and home be properly fostered and cherished.

 

Sacredness of marriage covenant threatened

 

The signs of the times definitely indicate that the sacredness of the marriage covenant is dangerously threatened. There are places where the marriage ceremony may be performed at any hour of the day or night without any previous arrangement. The license is issued and the ceremony performed while the couple waits. Many couples who have been entrapped by such enticements have had their marriages end in disappointment and sorrow. In some instances these places are nothing more than opportunities for legalized immorality. Oh, how far they fall below the true ideal! As far as lies within our power, we must warn young couples against secret and hasty marriages.

 

It is vital also to counteract the insidious influences of printed literature that speaks of the "bankruptcy of marriage," that advocates trial marriages, and that places extramarital relations on a par with extramarital friendships.

 

Responsibility of parenthood

 

Parenthood, and particularly motherhood, should be held as a sacred obligation. There is something in the depths of the human soul which revolts against neglectful parenthood. God has implanted deep in the souls of parents the truth that they cannot with impunity shirk the responsibility to protect childhood and youth.

 

There seems to be a growing tendency to shift this responsibility from the home to outside influences, such as the school and the church. Important as these outward influences are, they never can take the place of the influence of the mother and the father. Constant training, constant vigilance, companionship, being watchmen of our own children are necessary in order to keep our homes intact.

 

The character of the child is formed largely during the first 12 years of his life. During that period he spends 16 times as many waking hours in the home as in school, and 126 times as many hours in the home as in the church. Children go out with the stamp of these homes upon them, and only as these homes are what they should be will children be what they should be. Luther Burbank, the great plant wizard and scientist, most impressively emphasizes the need for constant attention in the training of a child. He says:

 

"Teach the child self-respect. Train it in self-respect just as you train a plant in better ways. No self-respecting man was ever a grafter. Above all, bear in mind repetition—the use of an influence over and over again, keeping everlastingly at it. This is what fixes traits in plants, the constant repetition of an influence until at last it is irrevocably fixed and will not change. You cannot afford to get discouraged. You are dealing with something far more precious than any plant—the precious soul of a child!"

 

Needs of children

 

There are three fundamental things to which every child is entitled: (1) a respected name, (2) a sense of security, (3) opportunities for development. The family gives to the child his name and standing in the community. A child wants his family to be as good as those families of his friends. He wants to be able to point with pride to his father, and to feel an inspiration always as he thinks of his mother. It is a mother's duty to so live that her children will associate with her everything that is beautiful, sweet, and pure. And the father should so live that the child, emulating his example, will be a good citizen and, in the Church, a true follower of the teachings of the gospel of Jesus Christ.

 

A child has the right to feel that in his home he has a place of refuge, a place of protection from the dangers and evils of the outside world. Family unity and integrity are necessary to supply this need.

 

He needs parents who are happy in their adjustment to each other, who are working hopefully toward the fulfillment of an ideal of living, who love their children with a sincere and unselfish love—in short, parents who are well-balanced individuals, gifted with a certain amount of insight, who are able to provide the child with a wholesome emotional background that will contribute more to his development than material advantages.

 

Evils of divorce

 

Divorce almost invariably deprives children of these advantages. Just recently I received a heartbreaking letter from a boy nearly eight years of age whose parents are divorced, from which I quote: Dear David O. McKay: I am having a problem and it is about Mom and Dad. They are divorced and we [meaning his brother and sister] want to be back together. Can you solve my problem? I love you." What a tragedy for that child, and what unhappiness this separation has caused the children.

 

The increasing divorce rate in the United States today is a threatening menace to this nation's greatness. The increase throughout the United States, and in our own state, in the percentage of divorces is alarming.

 

In the light of scripture, ancient and modern, we are justified in concluding that Christ's ideal pertaining to marriage is the unbroken home, and conditions that cause divorce are violations of his divine teachings. Except in cases of infidelity or other extreme conditions, the Church frowns upon divorce, and authorities look with apprehension upon the increasing number of divorces among members of the Church.

 

A man who has entered into sacred covenants in the house of the Lord to remain true to the marriage vow is a traitor to that covenant if he separates himself from his wife and family just because he has permitted himself to become infatuated with a pretty face and comely form of some young girl who flattered him with a smile. Even though a loose interpretation of the law of the land would grant such a man a bill of divorcement, I think he is unworthy of a recommend to have his second marriage solemnized in the temple. And any woman who will break up her home because of some selfish desire, or who has been untrue to her husband, is also untrue to the covenants she has made in the house of the Lord. When we refer to the breaking of the marriage tie, we touch upon one of the saddest experiences of life. For a couple who have basked in the sunshine of each other's love to stand by and see the clouds of misunderstanding and discord obscure the love-light of their lives is tragedy indeed. In the darkness that follos, the love sparkle in each other's eyes is obscured, and to try to restore it is fruitless.

 

Marriage a sacred obligation

 

To look upon marriage as a mere contract that may be entered into at pleasure in response to a romantic whim, or for selfish purposes, and severed at the first difficulty or misunderstanding that may arise, is an evil meriting severe condemnation, especially in cases wherein children are made to suffer because of such separation. Marriage is a sacred relationship entered into for purposes that are well recognized—primarily for the rearing of a family. A flippant attitude toward marriage, the ill-advised suggestion of "companionate marriage," the base, diabolical theory of "free sex experiment," and the ready-made divorce courts are dangerous reefs upon which many a family bark is wrecked.

 

In order to lessen the breaking up of homes, the present tendency toward a low view of marriage should be substituted by the lofty view of marriage that Jesus the Christ gives it. Let us look upon marriage as a sacred obligation and a covenant that is eternal, or that may be made eternal.

 

Teach the young of both sexes in the responsibilities and ideals of marriage so that they may realize that marriage involves obligation and is not an arrangement to be terminated at pleasure. Teach them that pure love between the sexes is one of the noblest things on earth, and the bearing and rearing of children the highest of all human duties. In this regard it is the duty of parents to set an example in the home that children may see and absorb, as it were, the sacredness of family life and the responsibilities associated therewith.

 

The number of broken marriages can be reduced if couples realize even before they approach the altar that marriage is a state of mutual service, a state of giving as well as of receiving, and that each must give of himself or herself to the utmost. Harriet Beecher Stowe wisely writes: "No man or woman can create a true home who is not willing in the outset to embrace life heroically, to encounter labor and sacrifice. Only to such can this divinest power be given to create on earth that which is the nearest image of heaven."

 

Temple marriage

 

Another condition that contributes to the permanence of the marriage covenant is marriage in the temple. Before such a marriage is performed, it is necessary for the young man and young woman first to obtain a recommend from the bishop. They should go to him in person, and the bishop who does his duty will instruct the couple regarding the sacredness of the obligation that they as young people are going to assume, emphasizing all the safeguards that have been named before. There, in the presence of the priesthood, before taking upon themselves the obligation of marriage, the young people receive instructions upon the sacredness of the duty that is before them; and, furthermore, they determine whether or not they are prepared to go in holiness and purity to the altar of God and there seal their vows and love.

 

Standard of purity

 

Finally, there is one principle that seems to me to strike right at the base of the happiness of the marriage relation, and that is the standard of purity taught and practiced among true members of the Church. In The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints there is but one standard of morality. No young man has any more right to be unchaste than has a young girl. That young man who asks for a recommend to take a pure girl to the altar is expected to give the same purity that he expects to receive.

 

For the proper solution of this great problem of the mounting divorce rate, we may turn with safety to Jesus as our guide. He declared that the marriage relation is of divine origin, that marriage is ordained of God" (D&C 49:15), that only under the most exceptional conditions should it be set aside. In the teaching of the Church of Christ, the family assumes supreme importance in the development of the individual and of the society. "Happy and thrice happy are they who enjoy an uninterrupted union, and whose love, unbroken by any complaint, shall not dissolve." The marriage ceremony when sealed by the authority of the Holy Priesthood endures, as do family relationships, throughout time and all eternity. "What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder." (Mark 10:9.)

 

God bless us to look more earnestly, prayerfully, and sincerely upon the sacredness of the home and the marriage covenant, I pray in the name of Jesus Christ. Amen.

 

 

(President David O. Mckay, Conference Report, April 1969, First Day—Morning Meeting 4.)

 

 

Handle problems the gospel way, what would the Savior do if he were in my shoes?

 

 

 

 

 

Harold B. Lee

 

October 28, 2004

 

 

Emphasis on education, missionary work, welfare, and priesthood coordination, PEC and Ward Councils were used more effectively.

 

Magazines were consolidated for the entire church.  Home>>>Priesthood>>>Auxiliaries, Activities don’t save!

 

All of these came together under the 3 part mission of the church, Perfect the Saints>>>Redeem the Dead>>>Proclaim the Gospel.

 

October, 1967 Conference talk & April, 1973 talk on strengthening the stakes of the Church.

 

You strengthen the stake by strengthening the family!

 

 

Harold B. Lee, “Strengthen the Stakes of Zion,” Ensign, July 1973, 2
It is a great delight to meet here today, and to those who may be listening from far and near, we assure you that we welcome you likewise.

This is the annual conference of the Church. April 6, 1973, is a particularly significant date because it commemorates not only the anniversary of the organization of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in this dispensation, but also the anniversary of the birth of the Savior, our Lord and Master, Jesus Christ. Joseph Smith wrote this, preceding a revelation given at that same date:

“The rise of the Church of Christ in these last days, being one thousand eight hundred and thirty years since the coming of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ in the flesh, it being regularly organized and established agreeable to the laws of our country, by the will and commandments of God, in the fourth month, and on the sixth day of the month which is called April.” (D&C 20:1.)

Traditionally since that time, the spring conferences of the Church are held on the days of each year which include April 6.

Two years later another revelation followed, which had great significance then, and today has even greater meaning as viewed in the light of the demands of the increasing membership in the Church. This is a quotation which may be something of a text for my next few remarks today:

“For Zion must increase in beauty, and in holiness; her borders must be enlarged; her stakes must be strengthened; yea, verily I say unto you, Zion must arise and put on her beautiful garments.” (D&C 82:14.)

Zion, as used here, undoubtedly had reference to the Church. At that time there was but a small body of Church members just beginning to emerge as an organization, after having experienced harsh treatment from enemies outside the Church, who had then been directed to gather together in Jackson County, Missouri, which the Lord had designated as the “land of Zion.”

As though to impress upon these early struggling members their destiny in the world, the Lord in another revelation told them this:

“Therefore, verily, thus saith the Lord, let Zion rejoice, for this is ZionTHE PURE IN HEART; therefore, let Zion rejoice, while all the wicked shall mourn.” (D&C 97:21.)

To be worthy of such a sacred designation as Zion, the Church must think of itself as a bride adorned for her husband, as John the Revelator recorded when he saw in vision the Holy City where the righteous dwelled, adorned as a bride for the Lamb of God as her husband. Here is portrayed the relationship the Lord desires in his people in order to be acceptable to our Lord and Master even as a wife would adorn herself in beautiful garments for her husband.

The rule by which the people of God must live in order to be worthy of acceptance in the sight of God is indicated by the text to which I have made reference. This people must increase in beauty before the world; have an inward loveliness which may be observed by mankind as a reflection in holiness and in those inherent qualities of sanctity. The borders of Zion, where the righteous and pure in heart may dwell, must now begin to be enlarged. The stakes of Zion must be strengthened. All this so that Zion may arise and shine by becoming increasingly diligent in carrying out the plan of salvation throughout the world.

While the Church was in its infancy, the Lord pointed to a time when those earlier gathering places would not have room for all who would be gathered for reasons for which he declared that his church should be united. Here are his words:

“For thus shall my church be called in the last days, even The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.” And then this command: “Arise and shine forth, that thy light may be a standard for the nations.” (D&C 115:4-5.)

Here is clearly inferred that the coming forth of his church in these days was the beginning of the fulfillment of the ancient prophecy when “the mountain of the Lord’s house shall be established in the top of the mountains, and shall be exalted above the hills; and all nations shall flow unto it. And many people shall go and say, Come ye, and let us go up to the mountain of the Lord, to the house of the God of Jacob; and he will teach us of his ways, and we will walk in his paths. …” (Isa. 2:2-3.)

In these revelations the Lord speaks of organized units of the Church which are designated as stakes, each of which those not of our faith may think of as a diocese. These units so organized are gathered together for these fundamental purposes: first, for a defense against the enemies of the Lord’s work, both the seen and the unseen.

The apostle Paul said with reference to these enemies about which we should be concerned:

“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.” (Eph. 6:12.)

These organizations were to be as stated in the revelation noted earlier, as a “refuge from the storm, and from wrath when it shall be poured out without mixture upon the whole earth.” (D&C 115:6.)

In the preface to all the Lord’s revelations that he gave from the beginning of this dispensation, he issued this fateful warning, which must never be absent from our minds. This prophetic warning of 1831 was given, as the Lord declared, so that “all men shall know that the day speedily cometh; the hour is not yet, but is nigh at hand, when peace shall be taken from the earth, and the devil shall have power over his own dominion.” (D&C 1:35.)

Now 142 years later we are witnessing the fury of this time, when Satan has power over his own dominion, with such might that even the Master in his day referred to him as the “prince of this world,” the “enemy of all righteousness.”

Despite these dire predictions and the evidences of their fulfillment truly before us today, there is promised in this same revelation even a greater power to thwart Satan’s plans to destroy the work of the Lord. Here the Lord makes this promise to the Saints of the Most High God, to the righteous in heart to whom he has referred as “the people of Zion.” This is what he said:

“And also the Lord shall have power over his saints, and shall reign in their midst, and shall come down in judgment upon Idumea, or the world.” (D&C 1:36.)

This has reference to the world in the same sense as when the Master spoke of the worldliness from which he warned his disciples, that while they would be engulfed in the world, they must keep themselves from the sins to be found therein.

I believe there has never been a time since the creation that the Lord has left the dominion of the devil to destroy his work without his power being manifest in the midst of the righteous to save the works of righteousness from being completely overthrown.

Today we are witnessing the promise of the Lord that “if your eye be single to my glory,” which he declared to the prophet Moses was “to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of man” (Moses 2:39), “your whole bodies shall be filled with light, and there shall be no darkness in you; and that body which is filled with light comprehendeth all things.” (D&C 88:67.)

We have also been promised by the Lord: “Behold, and lo, I will take care of your flocks, and will raise up elders and send unto them. Behold, I will hasten my work in its time.” (D&C 88:72-73.)

Today we are witnessing the demonstration of the Lord’s hand even in the midst of his saints, the members of the Church. Never in this dispensation, and perhaps never before in any single period, has there been such a feeling of urgency among the members of this church as today. Her boundaries are being enlarged, her stakes are being strengthened. In the early years of the Church specific places to which the Saints were to be gathered together were given, and the Lord directed that these gathering places should not be changed, but then he gave one qualification: “Until the day cometh when there is found no more room for them; and then I have other places which I will appoint unto them, and they shall be called stakes, for the curtains or the strength of Zion.” (D&C 101:21.)

At the Mexico City Area Conference last August, Elder Bruce R. McConkie of the Council of the Twelve, in a thought-provoking address, made some comments pertinent to this subject, and I quote a few sentences from his address:

“Of this glorious day of restoration and gathering, another Nephite prophet said: ‘The Lord … has covenanted with all the house of Israel,’ that ‘the time comes that they shall be restored to the true church and fold of God’; and that ‘they shall be gathered home to the lands of their inheritance, and shall be established in all their lands of promise.’ (2 Ne. 9:1-2.)

“Now I call your attention to the facts, set forth in these scriptures, that the gathering of Israel consists of joining the true church; of coming to a knowledge of the true God and of his saving truths; and of worshiping him in the congregations of the Saints in all nations and among all peoples. Please note that these revealed words speak of the folds of the Lord; of Israel being gathered to the lands of their inheritance; of Israel being established in all their lands of promise; and of there being congregations of the covenant people of the Lord in every nation, speaking every tongue, and among every people when the Lord comes again.”

Elder McConkie then concluded with this statement, which certainly emphasizes the great need for the teaching and training of local leadership in order to build up the church within their own native countries:

“The place of gathering for the Mexican Saints is in Mexico; the place of gathering for the Guatemalan Saints is in Guatemala; the place of gathering for the Brazilian Saints is in Brazil; and so it goes throughout the length and breadth of the whole earth. Japan is for the Japanese; Korea is for the Koreans; Australia is for the Australians; every nation is the gathering place for its own people.”

The most frequently asked question from inquirers is, “How do you account for the phenomenal growth of this church when so many others are on the decline?”

Among the primary and many factors which account for the continued growth of the Church, I will mention only a few, for those who would ask this question to ponder.

No longer might this church be thought of as the “Utah church,” or as an “American church,” but the membership of the Church is now distributed over the earth in 78 countries, teaching the gospel in 17 different languages at the present time.

This greatly expanded church population is today our most challenging problem, and while we have cause for much rejoicing in such a widespread expansion, it does pose some great challenges to the leadership of the Church to keep pace with the many problems.

Two basic principles have always guided the leaders of the Church in their planning to meet these circumstances. The first that might be called to the attention of those who would be interested is the basic principle of the plan of salvation from before the foundation of the world, for the redemption of mankind and which has been revealed to the prophets of this dispensation and has not been changed, for as the apostle Paul declared in his day, so do we declare today:

“But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. …

“But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man.

“For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ.” (Gal. 1:8, 11-12.)

If we were to answer those who ask us why the steady growth, we would answer that the first fundamental reason would be that we have held our course in teaching the fundamental doctrines of the Church. We declare in one of our Articles of Faith:

“We believe [and, we might add, teach] all that God has revealed, all that He does now reveal, and we believe that He will yet reveal many great and important things pertaining to the Kingdom of God.” (A of F 1:9.)

In one of the latest of the Lord’s revelations in this dispensation, he gave the reason for the confusion among the many churches then in existence: because they have, as he said, “strayed from mine ordinances, and have broken mine everlasting covenant; They seek not the Lord to establish his righteousness, but every man walketh in his own way, and after the image of his own God, whose image is in the likeness of the world. …” (D&C 1:15-16.)

Therefore a new restoration was necessary, as he plainly declared:

“Wherefore, I the Lord, knowing the calamity which should come upon the inhabitants of the earth, called upon my servant Joseph Smith, Jun., and spake unto him from heaven, and gave him commandments;

“And also gave commandments to others, that they should proclaim these things unto the world; and all this that it might be fulfilled, which was written by the prophets. …

“But that every man might speak in the name of God the Lord, even the Savior of the world; …

“That the fulness of my gospel might be proclaimed by the weak and the simple unto the ends of the world, and before kings and rulers.

“… after the manner of their language, that they might come to understanding.” (D&C 1:17-18, 20, 23-24.)

There are those who speak of an ecumenical movement, where theoretically, it is supposed, all churches would be brought together into a universal organization. In essence it probably would contemplate that they would give up their basic principles and be united in a nebulous organization which would not necessarily be founded on the principles as have traditionally been the doctrines of the church of Jesus Christ from the beginning.

When the revelations of the Lord are clearly understood, there is set forth the only basis of a united and universal church. It could not be accomplished as set forth by a man-made formula; it could only be accomplished when the fullness of the principles of the gospel of Jesus Christ are taught and practiced, as declared by the apostle Paul to the Ephesians, who said that the church is “built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone.” (Eph. 2:20.)

The mission of the Church has also been defined:

“And the voice of warning shall be unto all people, by the mouths of my disciples, whom I have chosen in these last days.

“Wherefore the voice of the Lord is unto the ends of the earth, that all that will hear may hear.” (D&C 1:4, 11.)

Obedient to that instruction, and from the beginning of the Church, there have been missionaries sent to all parts of the world. Today we have increasing numbers of missionaries, mostly younger men, who have been schooled from their childhood to prepare themselves for a call to serve as missionaries.

From a handful of missionaries in the early days of the Church, this number has been increased to over 17,000 serving today, each at his own expense, or at the expense of his immediate family, for a period of two or more years, each with a conviction in his heart that one so called has the divinity of his calling in his mind as he may go forth into any part of the world to which he may be called.

Another reason that might be given for the increase in the Lord’s work: perhaps as never before have there been so many people of the world searching for answers to the many perplexing problems.

While the principles of the gospel of Jesus Christ have not changed, the methods in meeting these challenges of the needs of today’s world must respond to the demands of our time. Fortunately the Lord has given, in the revelations to this church, the guidelines by which we should respond to the demands of the times. The plan of salvation has defined the way by which he would have us deal with the temporal needs of the people. The welfare plan of the Church seeks out those in distress. Where the newly found members are located, the plan of temporal salvation is, primarily, to teach the individuals how to take care of themselves. The Lord has provided a hedge against the terrifying impact upon the sanctity of the home and marriage, by strengthening the home and by providing guidelines to parents to teach their children the basic principles of honesty, virtue, integrity, thrift, and industry.

There is a concern of the Church for the individual members, from childhood to youth, and from among the youth into adulthood, to respond to the needs of members of the Church of every age.

In answer to the questions as to whether or not there may have been any dropouts or members who have fallen away, our answer has always been to recall the Master’s parable of the sower, where the sower went out to sow. Some of the seeds fell on fertile ground, but among the seeds which fell on fertile ground, some produced thirtyfold, some sixtyfold, and some ninetyfold. So today, in about that same ratio, we have some who are partially active, some are more so, and some who are thoroughly active in the Church, but we are always reaching out to the ones who have strayed away, and we are constantly trying to bring them back into full activity.

But perhaps the most important reason of all for the growth of the Church is the individual testimonies of the divinity of this work, as would be multiplied in the hearts of the individual members of the Church. For the strength of the Church is not in the numbers, nor in the amount of tithes and offerings paid by faithful members, nor in the magnitude of chapels and temple buildings, but because in the hearts of faithful members of the Church is the conviction that this is indeed the church and kingdom of God on the earth. Without that conviction, as one of my eminent business associates remarked, “The welfare plan of the Church would be but a shambles”; also missionary work would not flourish; and members would not be faithful in making generous contributions to the Church to finance its many operations. The secret of the strength of this church may be found in the statement of a president of a student body at one of our state-operated universities, whose identity, of course, is confidential. This is a quotation from his personal letter addressed to me:

“With the rule of the radical ideas which are sweeping the country, there has come a breakdown of family ties which is despised in many intellectual circles. The country is seemingly plied with sex education, abortion, planned parenthood, pornography, women’s liberation, communal living, premarital sex, and postmarital permissiveness. …”

And then this young college student leader concludes with this heartwarming declaration, which I know came from the depths of his soul. This is what he wrote:

“President Lee, I want you to know that the Latter-day Saint students on campus who keep the commandments are 100 percent behind you. Thank God we have leaders who stand firm against the subtle battle of the adversary who is striking at the home, the most vital unit of the world. Thank you for being the kind of a person that we, as young people growing up in this mixed-up world, can understand and can follow.”

By that same token, and in the language of that brilliant college student, I am convinced that the greatest of all the underlying reasons for the strength of this church is that those who keep the commandments of God are 100 percent behind the leadership of this church. Without that united support it would be readily understood that this church could not go forward to meet the challenges of the day. Our call is for the total membership of the Church to keep the commandments of God, for therein lies the safety of the world. As one keeps the commandments of God, he is not only persuaded as to the righteousness of the course that is being followed under the leadership of the Church, but also will have the Spirit of the Lord to guide him in his individual activities, for each baptized member has been given a sacred endowment when he was baptized and which has been committed to every baptized member of the Church by the authority of the priesthood: the gift of the Holy Ghost, which, as the Master declared, would teach all things, would bring all things to their remembrance, and even show them things to come. (See John 14:26.)

It will be clearly understood, then, that the great responsibility that the leaders and teachers in the Church have is to persuade, to teach, to direct aright, that the commandments of Almighty God will be so lived as to prevent the individual from falling into the trap of the evil one who would persuade him not to believe in God and not to follow the leadership of the Church.

I want to bear my sacred witness that because I know of the divinity of this work, I know that it will prevail; and that though there may be enemies within and without the Church who would seek to undermine and would seek to find fault and try to undermine the influence of the Church in the world, this church will be borne off triumphantly and will stand through the test of time when all the man-made efforts and weapons forged against the Lord’s word will fall by the wayside. I know that our Lord and Master Jesus Christ is the head of this church; that he has daily communion through agencies known to him, not only to the leaders of the Church in high positions, but also to individual members as they keep the commandments of God. To that I bear my sacred witness and leave my blessing upon all the faithful of the Church, and indeed in the world everywhere, in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ. Amen.

 

 

 

Spencer W. Kimball

 

November 4, 2004

 

 

 

Many in the Church wondered what kind of prophet he would be, President Lee was supposed to live a long time, but lasted only 19 months.

 

His address on When the World will be Converted in October 1974 set the course of the Church to this day.  His admonition to the 12 of taking the gospel to the world was emphasized. 

 

D&C 112

 

He was a Prophet of warning, marriage, divorce, killing needlessly, worshiping false gods etc.

 

 

 

A Small and Piercing Voice: The Sermons of Spencer W. Kimball                                                                           

by Eugene England

 

Notwithstanding it being a small voice it did pierce them that did hear to the center. 3 Nephi 11:3

 

Spencer W. Kimball was one of the most valuable Mormon orators of the twentieth century. In fact it is quite likely that, because of his unique opportunities as President of the Church during a dramatic period of world-wide growth and change, he was the Mormon speaker we have most to learn from about living and speaking. Though President Kimball was not as obviously gifted as other great speakers he admired and learned from, such as J. Reuben Clark, David O. McKay, and Stephen L Richards, when Latter-day Saints in the future think of individual sermons that have affected their lives, they will, I believe, recognize him as standing foremost in our time as a prophetic spokesman.

 

The first sermon by Spencer W. Kimball that I remember hearing remains for me the most surprising, challenging, and influential speech in my experience. In April 1954 Charlotte and I had been married three months and had recently received letters calling us both to serve as missionaries in Samoa. We had begun to feel something of what might be called "the spirit of Lehi," a powerful desire to help fulfill the remarkable promises made in the Book of Mormon about the "blossoming" of modern "Lamanites" and the prophecies of their crucial role in preparing for Christ's second coming. As we sat together in the Tabernacle in Tuesday, 6 April, we heard the most powerful evocation of that spirit--and perhaps the most forthright denunciation of prejudice--that we have ever heard, before or since, and it changed our lives. First, Elder Kimball shocked us out of our complacency about race consciousness (including our own) by quoting from an anonymous letter to him: "I never dreamed I would live to see the day when . . . an Indian buck [would be] appointed a bishop--an Indian squaw to talk in the Ogden Tabernacle--Indians to go through the Salt Lake Temple." fn Addressing himself to "Mrs. Anonymous," he proceeded to demonstrate God's absolute scriptural condemnation of all forms of racism and intolerance: "If it be so wrong for fraternization and brotherhood with minority groups and their filling Church positions and pews and pulpits of the Lord's Church, why did the Apostle Peter maintain so positively:['[God] . . . put no difference between us and them' (Acts 15:8-9)." fn Then he reviewed with impassioned rhetorical power the achievements of the ancestors of Jews and Indians and Polynesians and the promises made to their modern descendants:

 

O ye, who hiss and spurn, despise and scoff, who condemn and reject, and who in your haughty pride place yourselves above and superior to these Nephite-Lamanites: I pray you to not despise them until you . . . have that the prophet's children may be among us. Some of them could be now called Lagunas or Shoshones.

 

I beg of you, do not disparage the Lamanite-Nephites unless you, too, have the devoutness and strength to abandon public office to do missionary work among a despised people . . . as did the four sons of Mosiah. Their seed could be called Samoans or Maoris.

 

I ask you: Do not scoff and ignore these Nephite-Lamanites unless you can equal their forebears in greatness and until you can kneel with those thousands of Ammonite Saints in the sand on the field of battle while they sang songs of praise as their very lives were being snuffed out by their enemies. . . . Perhaps the children of the Ammonites are with us. They could be called Zunis or Hopis.

 

This remarkable refrain, unusual in style and unique in content, continued through eight separate examples. It built to a climax with a reference to Christ's personal appearance to the forefathers of these "Lamanite-Nephites"--and it left us moved and changed. We were made ashamed of the liberal condescension of our earlier desire to go "save" the Samoans. We were open for the first time to go and learn and to be permanently affected in our feelings by Polynesian peoples with a magnificent past, remarkable present qualities, and a marvelous prophetic future. Elder Kimball had helped prepare us to see all these things behind the labels and skin color and cultural trappings. He had changed our missions into a painful, exhilarating struggle toward new perceptions and emotional maturity and had so inoculated us with the spirit of Lehi that all our lives since have been significantly involved in learning from and trying to exercise intelligent responsibility toward "Lamanites."

 

How could a twenty-minute conference sermon, not sophisticated in language nor elegant in style, have such a profound effect? It is my thesis that Spencer W. Kimball sermons are so powerful because they are modern examples of what Erich Auerbach has praised as the epitome of Christian expression, the sermo humilis, the "lowly" or humble style which is characteristic of the New Testament and of the best writing and speaking through the Middle Ages, but which has increasingly given way to rhetorical and moral posturing since then. fn The sermo humilis was developed by the classical orators of Greece and Rome and codified by Cicero as part of a hierarchy of levels of literary ornament and sophistication parallel to three levels of subject matter: "low," where financial dealings and ordinary people are concerned; "lofty," where life and well-being, especially of the elite, is at stake; and "middling," largely for artistic entertainment. But Paul and the early Church Fathers understood (Augustine effectively demonstrated) that since God has created and Christ has redeemed everything, no such distinctions of the value of subject matter could be acceptable to Christians. Thus the whole range of rhetorical devices and levels that had been developed in classical oratory and literature could be used and mixed entirely as appropriate to each sermon's purpose, which includes consideration of the needs, but not the social class, of he audience. The result was the sermo humilis, a humble style understandable to all.

 

In the best oratory, as in the best literature (measured not by popularity or critical acclaim but by influence for good on actual lives), style is a purposeful but natural expression of the author's being and intentions. It is intelligent but not calculating, persuasive to ward transparently unselfish and morally sensible ends, aimed at moving the hearers but courageous to the point of being willing to offend them--and all with the intent of bringing about eventual repentance and redemption.

 

A good example of such style, from early in President Kimball's career, is a speech given at BYU in 1951 that, repeated in various versions, became famous as "A Style of Our Own." fn That is an interesting title since the speech itself seems not at all designed to be "stylish." It is not elegantly phrased or formally structured and certainly does not seem calculated to please--or even to be effective. It starts out, some what awkwardly and uncertainly, with a series of stories and examples centered around the general theme that the purpose of BYU is to build character in its students and that the students have a responsibility to take that purpose seriously, heavily subsidized as they are by the tithes of humble Latter-day Saints all over the world. The sermon then digresses into simple accounts of trips Elder Kimball had taken with his wife, recently to Mayan ruins in Central America years before to Pompeii. Reflections on the human corruption suggested by those ruined cities are followed by scriptural accounts of licentiousness and divine judgment and destruction--until a theme begins to appear: "Unchastity is the great demon of the 1950s. Avoid it as you would leprosy." fn And finally this rather common speech takes on uncommon force through the unique potential of Spencer W. Kimball's sermo humilis--his ability to speak, with the power of personal witness and specific detail, on an everyday human action that has eternal consequences:

 

I am not talking about something, my young brothers and sisters, of which I do not know. We interview thousands of missionaries, Church officers and other people. . . . I know I'm not going to be popular when I say this, but I am sure that the immodest dresses that are worn by our young women and their mothers, contribute in some degree to the immorality of this age." fn

 

The young Apostle gets increasingly specific and direct with his Mormon audience, many of whom were guilty--and still are:

 

I see the [Deseret News and other] papers constantly, things that hurt me. These queen contests! It seems that every class, every group, every club, must have a queen. The flattery resulting is destructive. If I had a hundred daughters I would resist any one ever becoming a queen, the object of a beauty parade or contest. . . . Evening gowns can be most beautiful and modest if they clothe the body. But the Lord never did intend that they should be backless or topless. Now I want to tell you, it's a sin. I tell you that the Prophet of the Lord abhors it. (I can see it isn't going very well with some of you.) But--it is still true! . . . Women who [come to a dance] in strapless gowns, or with strap gowns, and there is very little difference . . . are an abomination in the sight of the Lord. fn

 

In this sermon there is full acceptance of any subject matter, however "common" or even embarrassing, as relevant to salvation, and there is also that ingenuous mixture of styles, not according to prescribed classical categories but by inspired sense of effectiveness, that Augustine recommended in the Christian version of sermo humilis. As used by Roman theoreticians, the word humilis connoted inferior rank, but that adjective was taken over by Augustine and later Christian writers as the best word, in Auerbach's phrase, "to express the atmosphere and level of Christ's life and suffering":

 

The Incarnation as such was a voluntary humiliation illustrated by a life on earth in the lowest social class, among the materially and culturally poor, and by the whole character of Christ's acts and teachings. It was crowned by the cruelty and humiliation of the Passion.

 

Christ's life and death were "lowly" in that sense. And the gospel of Christ was addressed to the "lowly," the dispossessed and uncouth whom the worldly wise disdained, the "weak things" who would confound the mighty and strong (1 Cor. 1:27). And the gospel itself, as contained in the scriptures, was "lowly," even absurd, both in content and style--it was to "the Greeks foolishness" (1 Cor. 1:23). The paradox of the sermo humilis, as of the gospel itself, was, and is, that the humblest subjects and examples, addressed in the humblest and most direct manner by humble servants of God to humble children of God, could produce the most sublime literature and profoundest effects, could indeed move people to identify with the humble Christ, "the least of these my brethren," and thus to became like him.

 

Knowing about President Kimball's own physical and spiritual humiliations helps us understand some of the fundamental sources of his sermon style. His biography quotes journal accounts of such emotionally devastation times as when he had difficulty accepting, or sobbing. My wife was sitting by me on the floor, stroking my hair, trying to quiet me." fn There are reflections about the terrible inadequacy he felt because of continuing physical ailments:

 

Thousands of people in the Church . . . look at me with my smallness, my ineptitudes, my weaknesses, my narrow limitations and say, 'What a weak Church to have such weak leadership.' It is one of the things that has brought me to my back now. I have tried by double expenditure of energy to measure up.

 

Those physical troubles--boils, heart disease, throat cancer--did not end because of miraculous blessing, though there were blessing and miracles. They continued, even after the miracles, to be painful and dangerous trials that had to be endured--and that made their contributions to President Kimball's unique speaking style, to the form and content of his sermons, and even to the voice with which they were delivered. In 1957 he had an operation to try to stem the cancer in his throat. He pleaded with the New York specialist to remove as little tissue as possible because of the unique importance of his voice to his responsibility in the Church. Though this involved some risk of not getting all the cancer, the doctor left the larynx and part of one vocal cord. Through enormous, often painful and humiliating effort and the aid of a miraculous regrowth of some tissue, fn Spencer W. Kimball learned to speak again: "I realize I cannot quit for anything, though the temptation is terrific when I stumble and stammer and halt." fn The voice was forever changed, becoming small and raspy, full of the effort of breach required to sustain it--but emotionally piercing in a new way because it now constantly symbolized to his hearers what he had paid in courage and humility for that voice.

 

The voice changed in another way in 1974 when Elder Kimball was sustained as President of the Church after the unexpected death of Harold B. Lee. The sermon in the 1960s and early 1970s had been plain, straightforward, mostly single-subject, and usually directed to a basic moral commandment or repentance--always focused on helping the Saints live better day by day. The new responsibility to speak as the Prophet, to and for the whole Church, made President Kimball's sermons often much more miscellaneous and general than before, shaped by the need to give counsel to the whole Church--and the world--on a number of matters, from cleaning up yards and planting gardens to missiles and abortion. But the directness, the challenging emotional and moral plainness fundamental to the sermo humilis, remained the same, and the combination of style and vision often reached up to the sublime that is paradoxically linked to the lowly.

 

Even before he spoke for the first time as President to the general Church in the solemn assembly at April conference 1974, the new prophet delivered a remarkable address to the Regional Representatives seminar that outlined in detail how the Savior's command to take the gospel to all the world could be literally obeyed--and soon. The speech was not flamboyant in style nor did it announce any dramatic new program. It merely reviewed the clear commands of Christ to his former- and latter-day disciples, reminded us of our supposed belief that the Lord would provide a way to fulfill his commands, and asked us to proceed in that faith, providing us with a clear vision of future possibilities, complete with maps and numbers:

 

I felt absolutely certain that I would die, when my time came, as president of the Twelve. I had no idea that this could ever happen. But since it has happened there is only one thing for us to do and that is to move forward. . . .

 

When I read Church history, I am amazed at the boldness of the early brethren. . . . Even in persecution and hardship, they went and opened doors which evidently have been allowed to sag on their hinges and many of them to close. . . .

 

I believe the Lord can do anything he sets his mind to do.

 

But I can see no good reason why the Lord would open doors that we are not prepared to enter. Why should he break down the Iron Curtain or the Bamboo Curtain . . . if we are still unprepared to enter? . . .

 

Suppose that South Korea with its 37,000,000 people and its 7,500 members were to take care of its own proselyting needs and thus release to go into North Korea and possibly to Russia the hundreds who now go form the States to Korea.

 

If Japan could furnish its own 1,000 missionaries and then eventually 10,000 more for Mongolia and China, if Taiwan could furnish its own needed missionaries plus 500 for China and Vietnam and Cambodia, then we would begin to fulfill the vision. fn

 

That sermon helped transform the Church, releasing energies that almost doubled the missionary force in the next eight years, with similar increases in converts, new stakes organized, and total members. But the new energies were felt in a variety of other ways consistent with the humility and directness as well as sublimity of Spencer W. Kimball's sermo humilis. I remember how great a sense of shock and loss we all felt at the sudden death of Harold B. Lee, whom we had expected to preside for many years, how little some expected of the little man with the small voice whom we knew had health problems and might not live long--a caretaker President. But then all barriers melted away when President Kimball began that solemn assembly in April 1974 by exclaiming, "Oh, Harold, we miss you," and his voice pierced us with a sense of his open vulnerability as well as new visions and energy. Our expectations were changed especially when, after he matter-of-factly laid out his plan for converting the world, he sounded the call to "lengthen our stride" fn and then set the pace himself with personal action and expression and also with decisive leadership. He expanded the number of area conferences around the world and then spoke four or five times at each. He announced dramatic increases each year in planned temple-building throughout the "free world" (and the first temple behind the Iron Curtain) and then participated in increasing numbers of temple dedications, where he both spoke and gave many of the prayers. He directed major changes in the organization of the General Authorities and made the first modern additions to the LDS scriptures, culminating in the 1978 revelation that gave blacks the priesthood.

 

The announcement of that revelation itself (though it was a First Presidency statement, not written solely by President Kimball) is an excellent example of the style I am describing--simple, weighty but unflamboyant, personal but chaste:

 

Aware of the promises made by the prophets and presidents of the Church who have preceded us that at some time, in God's eternal plan, all of our brethren who are worthy may receive the priesthood, and witnessing the faithfulness of those from whom the priesthood has been withheld, we have pleaded long and earnestly in behalf of these, our faithful brethren, spending many hours in the Upper Room of the Temple supplicating the Lord for divine guidance.

 

He has heard our prayers, and by revelation has now confirmed that the long-promised day has come. . . .

 

We declare with soberness that the Lord has now made known his will for the blessing all his children. fn

 

That first long sentence--reflecting the long wait of the Church, of faithful blacks and whites who prayed for the day to come, of President Kimball's own long struggle against our prejudices, culminating in those many hours at prayer in the Temple throughout the spring of 1978--is one example of how a natural style reveals itself. Another example is the brief clarity that follows, suppressing the emotion like a spring in sentences that witness that God has spoken, until it is released by the arresting biblical phrase, "We declare with soberness."

 

President Kimball's most biblical sermon, in language, content, and general approach, was written for the June 1976 Ensign, apparently designed to be read by Church members at the very time they would be celebrating the American bicentennial in a somewhat self-congratulatory mood. The title, "The False Gods We Worship," provides fair warning of how severe the prophet will be, but the sermon opens with a gentle personal reminiscence of recent walks in his garden that brought back childhood memories. He injects a slightly ominous note with a reference to "dark and massive clouds of an early thunderstorm," then returns to what seems an innocuous patriotic theme, reflecting on the "mellow light" of his childhood valley, certain that if he were to create a world it would be "just like this one" and affirming that "there is much that is good in this land, and much to love." But with a sudden "nevertheless" he turns to his real theme, reinforcing the change with his imagery again: "The dark and threatening clouds that hung so low over the valley seemed to force my mind back to a theme the Brethren have concerned themselves with for many years now-- . . . the general state of wickedness in which we seem to find the world." Using a device of the Old Testament prophets, particularly Amos, he allows his audience for a time to think he is denouncing the wicked world outside Israel, Babylon's "pollution" and "idolatry." Then, just as we have reached full agreement with that denunciation of the world at large and are even feeling a bit smug and superior, he makes it clear that Americans are also guilty and then that Mormons come under the judgment, in fact are in greatest danger because "where much is given much is expected." fn

 

In one of the very few theoretical passages in all his work, President Kimball proceeds to explain his literal use of the word idolatry: "Carnal man had tended to transfer his trust in God to material things. . . . Whatever thing a man sets his heart and his trust in most is his god: and if his god doesn't also happen to be the true and living God of Israel, than man is laboring in idolatry." fn He identifies in unforgettable imagery and anecdotes the two chief idols of many of us Americans and Mormons--material goods and armaments--and then preaches as the only saving alternatives the individual living of the law of consecration and an active, affirmative loving of our enemies.

 

I am afraid that many of us have been surfeited with flocks and herds and acres and barns and wealth and have begun to worship them as false gods. . . . Forgotten is the fact that our assignment is to use these many resources in our families and quorums to build up the kingdom of God--to further the missionary effort . . . to bless others in every way, that they may also be fruitful. . . . We are, on the whole, an idolatrous people--a condition most repugnant to the Lord. . . .

 

We are a warlike people, easily distracted from our assignment of preparing for the coming of the Lord. When enemies rise up, we commit vast resources to the fabrication of gods of stone and steel--ships, planes, missiles, fortifications--and depend on them for protection and deliverance. When threatened, we become antienemy instead of pro-kingdom of God; we train a man in the art of war and call him a patriot, thus, in the manner of Satan's counterfeit of true patriotism, perverting the Savior's teaching [that we love our enemies]. . . .

 

We forget that if we are righteous the Lord will either not suffer our enemies to come upon us--and this is the special promise to the inhabitants of the land of the Americas (see 2 Nephi. 1:7)--or he will fight our battles for us. fn

 

President Kimball ends this sermon, which seems to me one of the most unusual and challenging given to twentieth-century Mormons, with an irrefutable explanation of why revenge and confrontation, name-calling and sanctions, indeed any form of fighting our enemies, even winning, will never resolve conflicts--and thus why all who call themselves Christians must do something with enemies other that fight them. We must rely primarily on love, on praying and giving and teaching, rather than on armaments, if we are ever to do away with those enemies in the only effective and permanent way, by changing them into friends:

 

What are we to fear when the Lord is with us? Can we not take the Lord at his word and exercise a particle of faith in him? Our assignment is affirmative: to forsake the things of the world as ends in themselves; to leave off idolatry and press forward in faith; to carry the gospel to our enemies, that they might to longer be our enemies. fn

 

It is probably true that some of us American Mormons still think we can hunt for sport, can promote our daughters' participation in skimpy-costumed drill teams or beauty contests, can engage in conspicuous consumption, can be vaguely suspicious of other races, and can put more faith in missiles than in missionaries. But Spencer W. Kimball's denunciations of all of these actions and attitudes stand in the record, in powerful sermons that will touch and help change all who rad carefully and humbly. And they stand in judgment on those of us who will not.

 

Even into the late 1970s, when physical problems began to slow him down, President Kimball continued to challenge all varieties of Mormons. First Presidency messages condemned abortion, the Equal Rights Amendment, the MX missile and by clear implication all primary reliance on nuclear deterrence and asserted that international conflicts as well as personal ones can best be resolved by obeying Christ's command to "love our enemies." fn Earlier, President Kimball had reviewed the great prophecies and expectations past leaders had voiced concerning the development of a great Mormon art and literature and then added his own hopes. But he did so with unusual but characteristic advice, consistent with his own sermo humilis, about what would make such literature possible, that is, a willingness to deal with both the problematic and the exalting in Mormon experience rather than merely with the safe middle ground:

 

For years I have been waiting for someone to do justice in recording in song and story and painting and sculpture the story of the Restoration, the reestablishment of the kingdom of God on earth, the struggles and frustrations; the apostasies and inner revolutions and counter-revolutions of those first decades; of the exodus; of the counter-reactions; of the transitions; of the persecution days; of the miracle man, Joseph Smith, of whom we sing "Oh, what rapture filled his bosom, For he saw the living God" (Hymns, no. 136); and of the giant colonizer and builder, Brigham Young. fn

 

But the sermon of President Kimball's that perhaps best combines the qualities of both the lowly and the sublime, both the hard moral challenge and the comforting, exalting divine witness, came quite late in his career. At the priesthood session of the April 1978 general conference, he began with some very exhortations about the family and the need for priesthood holders to guard it from evil influences through their selection of magazines and newspapers. But then he moved into a purely pastoral passage of reminiscences from his Arizona youth, much like that at the beginning of "The False Gods We Worship." This was extended with wonderfully personal, vaguely self-deprecating details and anecdotes, climaxing in a review of songs he sang in church, spiced with some witty interjections and repetitions:

 

I can remember how lustily we sang:

 

Hark! Hark! Hark! 'tis children's music,

Children's voices, O, how sweet. . . .

That the Children may live long,

And be beautiful and strong.

 

I wanted to live a long time and I wanted to be beautiful and strong--but never reached it. . . .

 

Drink no liquor, and they eat

But a very little meat

 

[I still don't eat very much meat.]

 

They are seeking to be great and good and wise.

 

And then we'd "Hark! Hark! Hark!" again. fn

 

This apparently merely entertaining interlude united us powerfully with the "lowly" humanity in President Kimball, so that we were well prepared to accept, as coming from one like ourselves, the remarkable conclusion, in which he challenged (for the first time in a modern general conference) our complacent participation in a major Utah industry, hunting for mere sport:

 

I remember many times singing with a loud voice:

 

Don't kill the little birds,

That sing on bush and tree. . . .

 

I had a sling and I had a flipper. I made them myself, and they worked very well. . . . But I think perhaps because I sang nearly every Sunday, "Don't Kill the Little Birds," I was restrained. fn

 

The seriousness with which President Kimball took his subject is indicated by his repeating and expanding on this topic in the following October general conference, just before the Utah deer hunting season. The difficulty of taking this stand in the Mormon community was reflected in a statement issued by the Church Public Communications Office the next week that the Church had not officially condemned all hunting--and perhaps in the rather indirect title the earlier sermon was given in the Ensign: "Strengthening the Family--The Basic Unit of the Church." fn

 

The sermon ends with a different, though equally difficult, challenge, one that is spiritual rather than moral, but one that has also received little attention, perhaps because it was not really noticed. In the way characteristic of sermo humilis, the President moved without any transition or any dramatic explanation to a short, small, unique, typically humble and indirect, but piercing testimony of his prophetic calling and consequent experience with the divine:

 

"I know the God lives. I know that Jesus Christ lives," said John Taylor my predecessor, "for I have seen him." I bear his testimony to you brethren in the name of Jesus Christ, Amen. fn

 

 

(A Small and Piercing Voice: the Sermons of Spencer W. Kimball by Eugene England Fn, BYU Studies, vol. 25 (1985), Number 4 - Fall 1985 87.)

 

 

 

 

 

President Benson & the Seventy

 

November 18, 2004

 

 

 

 

A History of the Latter-day Seventy

By Elder L. Aldin Porter
Of the Presidency of the Seventy

L. Aldin Porter, “A History of the Latter-day Seventy,” Ensign, Aug. 2000, 15
As President Spencer W. Kimball stood at the pulpit in the Salt Lake Tabernacle on 3 October 1975, few of those watching realized the significance of the statement he was about to make. Though it did not appear to involve major action at the time, his announcement would eventually affect the way the Church was administered throughout the world. He said:

“Today we announce to you the appointment of four new General Authorities [Seventies] to assist in the carrying forth of the work of the Lord. … The First Quorum of the Seventy will be gradually organized, eventually with seventy members, the presidency of which will be made up of the seven members [of the present First Council of the Seventy].” 1

The day had arrived when the growth of the Church required the reconstitution of the First Quorum of the Seventy. It had been nearly 150 years since the Church had its beginnings in Fayette, New York, in a humble log cabin. Church membership had now grown from six men into millions, with hundreds of thousands of converts being added each year.

Over the years, the organization of the Seventy has changed to meet the needs of the worldwide Church, but the Seventy’s mission has stayed the same: to preach the gospel, to be especial witnesses of Jesus Christ, and to help the Apostles build up and administer the Church (see D&C 107:25, 34).

The Seventy Called

The history of the Seventy in this dispensation began in the early years of the Restoration. On 8 February 1835, the Prophet Joseph Smith called Elders Brigham and Joseph Young to his home in Kirtland, Ohio, and related a vision he had received about those who had died in Zion’s Camp. He then said: “ ‘I wish to notify all the brethren living in the branches, within a reasonable distance from this place, to meet at a general conference on Saturday next. I shall then and there appoint twelve Special Witnesses, to open the door of the Gospel to foreign nations, and you,’ said he (speaking to Brother Brigham), ‘will be one of them.’ ” After explaining their duties, “he then turned to Elder Joseph Young with quite an earnestness, as though the vision of his mind was extended still further, and addressing him, said, ‘Brother Joseph, the Lord has made you President of the Seventies.’ They had heard of Moses and seventy Elders of Israel, and of Jesus appointing ‘other Seventies,’ but had never heard of Twelve Apostles and of Seventies being called in this Church before. It was a strange saying, ‘The Lord has made you President of the Seventies,’ as though it had already taken place, and it caused these brethren to marvel.” 2

Forty-eight days later, the revelation known as section 107 was given, which included the following instructions:

“The Seventy are also called to preach the gospel, and to be especial witnesses unto the Gentiles and in all the world—thus differing from other officers in the church in the duties of their calling.

“And they form a quorum, equal in authority to that of the Twelve special witnesses or Apostles just named. …

“The Seventy are to act in the name of the Lord, under the direction of the Twelve or the traveling high council, in building up the church and regulating all the affairs of the same in all nations, first unto the Gentiles and then to the Jews;

“The Twelve being sent out, holding the keys, to open the door by the proclamation of the gospel of Jesus Christ, and first unto the Gentiles and then unto the Jews” (D&C 107:25-26, 34-35).

A few months after the death of the Prophet Joseph Smith and his brother Hyrum, a general conference of the Church was held in Nauvoo on 6-8 October 1844. Much of the conference was devoted to putting the organization of the priesthood in place, in accordance with a motion Elder Heber C. Kimball of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles presented early in the conference, “that we as a church endeavor to carry out the principles and measures heretofore adopted and laid down by Joseph Smith as far as in us lies, praying Almighty God to help us to do it.” 3 This motion carried unanimously. As part of this conference, President Brigham Young said to the Seventy, “You are all apostles to the nations to carry the gospel; and when we send you to build up the kingdom, we will give you the keys and power and authority.” 4 This statement of President Young can be better understood by referring to a statement made by President Joseph F. Smith: “The seventies are called to be assistants to the twelve apostles; indeed they are apostles of the Lord Jesus Christ, subject to the direction of the Twelve, and it is their duty to respond to the call of the Twelve, under the direction of the First Presidency of the Church, to preach the gospel to every creature, to every tongue and people under the heavens, to whom they may be sent.” 5 Members of the Seventy receive delegated authority from the First Presidency or Quorum of the Twelve Apostles to function in their appointed roles.

An Unfolding Organization

When the Saints left Nauvoo, there were 35 quorums of the Seventy. This number had increased to 146 by 1904. It was clear that these were general Church quorums and not stake quorums. Their major responsibility was to serve as emissaries of the Lord across the earth. Then, during the mid-1930s the First Presidency and the Quorum of the Twelve placed the Seventies under stake supervision.

In the October 1976 general conference, one year after President Kimball had indicated that the First Quorum of the Seventy would be gradually organized, he said:

“In 1941, five high priests were called to assist the Twelve Apostles in their heavy work, and to fill a role similar to that envisioned by the revelations for the First Quorum of the Seventy. The scope and demands of the work at that time did not justify the reconstitution of the First Quorum of the Seventy. In the intervening years, additional Assistants to the Twelve have been added, and today we have twenty-one.

“Commencing a year ago, brethren other than the First Council of the Seventy were called into the First Quorum of the Seventy, and at present there are fourteen in that quorum, including the First Council.

“Since the functions and responsibilities of the Assistants to the Twelve and the Seventy are similar, and since the accelerated, worldwide growth of the Church requires a consolidation of its administrative functions at the general level, the First Presidency and the Quorum of the Twelve, with the concurrence of the Assistants to the Twelve and the First Quorum of the Seventy, have felt inspired to call all of the Assistants to the Twelve into the First Quorum of the Seventy, to call four new members into that quorum, and to restructure the First Council of the Seventy. …

With this move, the three governing quorums of the Church defined by the revelations—the First Presidency, the Quorum of the Twelve, and the First Quorum of the Seventy—have been set in their places as revealed by the Lord. This will make it possible to handle efficiently the present heavy workload and to prepare for the increasing expansion and acceleration of the work, anticipating the day when the Lord will return to take direct charge of His church and kingdom.” 6

This action more clearly established the relationship of the Seventy to the Twelve as described by the Lord in D&C 107:38: “It is the duty of the traveling high council to call upon the Seventy, when they need assistance, to fill the several calls for preaching and administering the gospel, instead of any others.”

On one occasion Elder Bruce R. McConkie (1915-85) of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles listed three things which had happened in his lifetime which he said would do more than anything else for the spreading of the gospel, for the perfecting of the Saints, and for the salvation of men. The first of these three things was “the receipt of the revelation which makes the priesthood … available … without reference to race or ancestry.” The second was “the organization of the First Quorum of the Seventy as the third great council of the Church,” and the third was “the publication of the standard works … with the new teaching aids that accompany them.” 7

The unfolding of the present-day organization of the Seventy continued with an announcement in the October 1978 general conference by President N. Eldon Tanner (1898-1982), a counselor in the First Presidency:

“The very rapid growth of the Church across the world, with the attendant increase in travel and responsibility, has made it necessary to consider a change in the status for some of the Brethren of the General Authorities. Some of our associates have served for many years with complete and unselfish dedication, and they deserve every honor and recognition for such devoted service. It is felt advisable at this time to reduce somewhat the load of responsibility that they carry.

“After a long period of prayerful consideration and counsel, extending, indeed, over several years, we announce a new and specific status to be given from time to time to Brethren of our associates in the General Authorities. We announce that some Brethren have been designated as emeritus members of the First Quorum of the Seventy. These Brethren are not being released but will be excused from active service. It is out of consideration for the personal well-being of the individuals, and with deep appreciation for their devoted service, that this designation will be given from time to time to designated members of the General Authorities.” 8

The call to serve as a member of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles is, of necessity, a call for life. This is so because of the Lord’s system of seniority whereby the President of the Church is chosen. 9 This same system of seniority does not exist among the Seventy, and there is no need for them to give a lifetime of service as Seventies even though that was the practice for many years.

On the other hand, the Presidency of the Seventy is unique. Most presidencies in the Church have a presidency of three: a president and two counselors. But the revelations indicate a different organization for the Seventy. Note that in the Presidency of the Seventy all are Presidents—none are counselors: “And it is according to the vision showing the order of the Seventy, that they should have seven presidents to preside over them, chosen out of the number of the seventy; and the seventh president of these presidents is to preside over the six” (D&C 107:93-94).

The seventh, or presiding, President is the one with the most longevity or more uninterrupted years of service in the Presidency of the Seventy than the other six Presidents.

“A Constant Infusion of New Talent”

In the 1980s, several additional inspired decisions accelerated the opportunity of the Seventy to serve while they remained of an age and in a status of health that the heavy rigors of the work could be accomplished. In the April 1984 general conference, President Gordon B. Hinckley, then a counselor in the First Presidency, explained:

“In the case of the Seventy, we are putting into effect the practice long generally followed and accepted in the Church with reference to other offices. Members of the First Quorum of the Seventy are General Authorities in every sense: in calling, in responsibility, in power and authority. Theirs have been permanent appointments, and those presently serving will continue so to serve. However, tenure of appointment is not important insofar as the work is concerned. Calls to serve as bishop, stake president, Regional Representative, mission president, temple president, and president of the auxiliary organizations are for a period of years. The individual is then honorably released and others are afforded the opportunity of service. After much prayerful consideration, we have called six men, mature and tested through long years of service, to become members of the First Quorum of the Seventy, to serve for periods of three to five years, just as a mission president or temple president would do, and then to be released with honor and appreciation. While they so serve, they will be General Authorities with every right, power, and authority necessary to function. They will be expected to give their full time to this work while they are in office. This procedure, we feel, will provide a constant infusion of new talent and a much widened opportunity for men of ability and faith to serve in these offices.” 10

Then, in October 1986, President Ezra Taft Benson made the following announcement:

“In harmony with the needs of the growth of the Church across the world, the First Presidency and Council of the Twelve Apostles have given prayerful consideration to the role of the stake seventies quorums in the Church and have determined to take the following action relative thereto:

“… The seventies quorums in the stakes of the Church are to be discontinued, and the brethren now serving as seventies in these quorums will be asked to return to membership in the elders quorums of their wards. Stake presidents, in an orderly fashion, may then determine who among such brethren should be ordained to the office of high priest.

“This change does not affect the First Quorum of the Seventy, members of which are all General Authorities of the Church. …

“At this time, we commend all who have served both past and present as members of stake seventies quorums of the Church and who have so ably given of their time, talents, and resources in spreading forth the gospel of Jesus Christ.” 11

This announcement was in keeping with President Brigham Young’s statement more than 138 years earlier: “The Seventies are not called to be a local body, but are ordained … to travel, ordain local officers, and build up and set in order the whole Kingdom of God upon the earth, wherever it is necessary.” 12

New Quorums Formed

In the early days of the Restoration, the Lord made provision for the future growth of the Church when He said:

“And these seven presidents are to choose other seventy. …

“And also other seventy, until seven times seventy, if the labor in the vineyard of necessity requires it.

“And these seventy are to be traveling ministers, unto the Gentiles first and also unto the Jews” (D&C 107:95-97).

The day came as prophesied in the scriptures when the work required that an additional Quorum of the Seventy be organized. This was done in April 1989, when President Benson said in the general priesthood session:

“With the continued rapid growth of the Church, the First Presidency and the Quorum of the Twelve have determined that the time has come to take additional steps to provide for the expansion and regulation of the Church. We announce, therefore, the organization of the Second Quorum of the Seventy to become effective immediately.

“The initial membership of the Second Quorum of the Seventy will be those General Authorities currently serving under a five-year call. Additional Brethren will be added to the Second Quorum of the Seventy from time to time and will serve as Seventies and as General Authorities also under a five-year call.” 13

The work continued to expand, and six years later, in preparation for further fulfillment of the role of the Seventies, President Gordon B. Hinckley said in the April 1995 general conference:

“Now in the ongoing of this work, administrative changes sometimes occur. The doctrine remains constant. But from time to time there are organizational and administrative changes made under provisions set forth in the revelations.

“For instance, twenty-eight years ago the First Presidency was inspired to call men to serve as regional representatives of the Twelve … to train our stake and ward leaders in the programs of the Church that they in turn might train the membership in their responsibilities before the Lord.

“At that time there were 69 regional representatives. Today there are 284. The organization has become somewhat unwieldy.

“More recently the Presidency were inspired to call men from the Seventy to serve in Area Presidencies. As the work grows across the world, it has become necessary to decentralize administrative authority to keep General Authorities closer to the people. We now have such Area Presidencies well established and effectively functioning.

“It is now felt desirable to tighten up the organization administered by the Area Presidencies. Accordingly, we announce the release—the honorable release—of all regional representatives effective August 15 of this year. …

“Now we announce the call of a new local officer to be known as an area authority. These will be high priests chosen from among past and present experienced Church leaders. They will continue with their current employment, reside in their own homes, and serve on a Church-service basis. The term of their call will be flexible, generally for a period of approximately six years. They will be closely tied to the Area Presidencies. They will be fewer in number than have been the regional representatives. We are guided in setting up this new corps of area officers, as were our Brethren before us in the calling of regional representatives, by the provision contained in the revelation on priesthood, section 107 of the Doctrine and Covenants. After directions to the Twelve and the Seventy, the revelation states:

“ ‘Whereas other officers of the church, who belong not unto the Twelve, neither to the Seventy, are not under the responsibility to travel among all nations, but are to travel as their circumstances shall allow, notwithstanding they may hold as high and responsible offices in the church.’ ” 14

The call of Area Authorities was a preparatory step for what occurred just 24 months later. In the April 1997 general conference, President Hinckley announced that the Area Authorities would now be known as Area Authority Seventies. He said:

“They will continue with their present employment, reside in their own homes, and serve on a Church-service basis. Those residing in Europe, Africa, Asia, Australia, and the Pacific will become members of the Third Quorum of Seventy. Those in Mexico, Central America, and South America will become members of the Fourth Quorum. Those residing in the United States and Canada will become members of the Fifth Quorum.

“They may be assigned to (a) preside at stake conferences and train stake presidencies, (b) create or reorganize stakes and set apart stake presidencies, (c) serve as counselors in Area Presidencies, (d) chair regional conference planning committees, (e) serve on area councils presided over by the Area Presidency, (f) tour missions and train mission presidents, and (g) complete other duties as assigned.

“Consistent with their ordination as Seventies, they become officers of the Church with a specific and definite tie to a quorum. While there will be only limited opportunities for them to come together in quorum meetings, the Presidents of the Seventy will communicate with them, will instruct them, receive reports, and do other things of that kind. They will now have a sense of belonging that they have not experienced up to this time. As Seventies they are called to preach the gospel and to be especial witnesses of the Lord Jesus Christ as set forth in the revelations. Though all Seventies have equal scriptural authority, members of the First and Second Quorums are designated General Authorities, while members of the Third, Fourth, and Fifth are designated Area Authorities.

“Although the ordination to the office of Seventy is without term, a Seventy is called to serve in a quorum for a designated period of years. At the conclusion of this service, he will return to activity in his respective ward and stake and will meet with his high priests group. …

“With these respective quorums in place, we have established a pattern under which the Church may grow to any size with an organization of Area Presidencies and Area Authority Seventies, chosen and working across the world according to need.” 15

Today there are 276 members of the Seventy called, as the Lord has said, to “bear record of my name in all the world, wherever … mine apostles, shall send them to prepare a way before my face” (D&C 124:139). These Seventies supervise the work of the Church under the direction of the Quorum of the Twelve in 28 areas scattered across the earth. The number of areas and quorums will certainly increase as the years pass and the work intensifies, but the organization is now in place to keep the administration of the Church close to the prophets, seers, and revelators whom the Lord has called to direct the work. Yet this work has hardly begun, and the future is bright with the promise that the ordinances and covenants of salvation and exaltation will be made available to “every nation, kindred, tongue and people” (1 Ne. 19:17). The revelations have made clear that this kingdom will roll forth as the stone “cut out without hands” and become a “great mountain, and [fill] the whole earth” (see Dan. 2:34-35).

(Doctrine and Covenants 64:29-33.)

 

29 Wherefore, as ye are agents, ye are on the Lord's errand; and whatever ye do according to the will of the Lord is the Lord's business.

 

30 And he hath set you to provide for his saints in these last days, that they may obtain an inheritance in the land of Zion.

 

31 And behold, I, the Lord, declare unto you, and my words are sure and shall not fail, that they shall obtain it.

 

32 But all things must come to pass in their time.

 

33 Wherefore, be not weary in well-doing, for ye are laying the foundation of a great work. And out of small things proceedeth that which is great.

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 107:10.)

10 High priests after the order of the Melchizedek Priesthood have a right to officiate in their own standing, under the direction of the presidency, in administering spiritual things, and also in the office of an elder, priest (of the Levitical order), teacher, deacon, and member.

History of the 70’s – Evolution of the Seventy up to today

President Benson emphasized many things during his Presidency like the B of M, Fulfillment in callings, Pride, etc.  The gospel spread to Eastern Europe.

Study>>>>>>>>Retain>>>>>>>>Teach Others

 

Catch the message of what it means to follow the Prophet.  President Hinckley had to respond to critics who thought President Benson was suppressed in his duties as the Prophet; these folks didn’t understand how keys of the priesthood operate.  There aren’t palace coups in the Church!!

You get some idea, by brethren and sisters, from this, holy very important, how extremely sacred is the Holy Priesthood, which is nothing more nor less than divine authority committed unto man, and in the foregoing declaration is shown the absolute impartiality of our Father in heaven, for he says: "Whoso," (meaning any man and every man), "is faithful unto the obtaining these two priesthoods of which I have spoken, and the magnifying their calling," will enter into the possession of all things, for he will become a joint heir with Jesus Christ, the Lord, in such possession. Now, I ask you, what more could a faithful high priest receive than the promise of this blessing? Could he receive any more if he were an apostle? Could he receive any more if he were a counselor in the Presidency of the Church? Could he receive anything more if he were the President of the Church, than a promise which gives to him a joint heirship in all things? No, he could not. And so it is with the faithful seventy, and so with the faithful elder in the Church.

 

There is no need for envy. There is no need for overweening ambition. There is no need to reach out and try to grasp that to which we are not entitled. The essential thing is that every man should see to it, that he obtains the High Priesthood. If he advances no further than the office of an elder but is faithful in the magnifying of his calling, he will enter into his glory and exaltation and will receive the fulness of which the record speaks.

 

 

(Elder Rudger Clawson., Conference Report, October 1917, Afternoon Session. 28 - 29.)

President Benson Conference talks October 1986, and April 1987

The Lord won’t give us more unless we are living what He has already given.

The Book of Mormon is the keystone of our religion, it leads us to Christ.

Witness of Christ>>>>>Doctrine>>>>>Testimony,

It contains the pattern for preparing for the 2nd Coming.  From 1st Nephi to Moroni, Mormon edited the plates for us, who else would have them but us?

 

It contains the fulness of the gospel, the spiritual rebirth process, from the creation, fall, atonement, faith, repentance, baptism and receiving the gift of the Holy Ghost.

 

It also exposes the enemies of Christ (their attitudes to the message).

 

Bruce went into great detail on how he studies the gospel, by doctrines and using all 4 scriptures plus the words of the Prophets and Apostles.  Write down what you learn it will help your mind organize the material, read the scriptures looking for specific doctrines and the storyline, use the topical guide.

 

(Doctrine and Covenants 84:54-57.)

 

54 And your minds in times past have been darkened because of unbelief, and because you have treated lightly the things you have received—

 

55 Which vanity and unbelief have brought the whole church under condemnation.

 

56 And this condemnation resteth upon the children of Zion, even all.

 

57 And they shall remain under this condemnation until they repent and remember the new covenant, even the Book of Mormon and the former commandments which I have given them, not only to say, but to do according to that which I have written—

 

 

The former commandments are the revelations previously given in the D&C.

 

 

Doctrine and Covenants – Capstone

 

Book of Mormon – Keystone

 

 

            Old Testament                                                                           New Testament

 

 

 

You can’t understand any of the scriptures without studying the other scriptures; they are to be studied as one.  Build up a great library to study from.

 

(Alma 22:14.)

 

14 And since man had fallen he could not merit anything of himself; but the sufferings and death of Christ atone for their sins, through faith and repentance, and so forth; and that he breaketh the bands of death, that the grave shall have no victory, and that the sting of death should be swallowed up in the hopes of glory; and Aaron did expound all these things unto the king.

 

 

Without Jesus Christ I cannot be saved, no matter what, I fall short like Paul said.

 

(Romans 3:23.)

 

23 For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;

 

 

 

 

 

 

Teach Them Correct Principles

 

December 2, 2004

 

 

 

We talked about the Jerusalem Center and how it benefits the community, the growth of the

Church in West Africa and around the world during President Hunter’s administration.

 

 

(Jacob 5:72-73.)

 

72 And it came to pass that the servants did go and labor with their mights; and the Lord of the vineyard labored also with them; and they did obey the commandments of the Lord of the vineyard in all things.

 

73 And there began to be the natural fruit again in the vineyard; and the natural branches began to grow and thrive exceedingly; and the wild branches began to be plucked off and to be cast away; and they did keep the root and the top thereof equal, according to the strength thereof.

 

Root = Gospel >>>>>>> Branch = Members

 

 

We discussed the budget allowance and moving toward the Law of Consecration and the change in funding missions.

 

 

Activities should be planned to aid the family and the individual, not the other way around.

 

Individual>>>>>>>>Family>>>>>>>>Priesthood>>>>>>>>Auxiliary>>>>>>>Activity

 

 

We seemed to be scared to let member govern themselves because we haven’t taught them correct doctrines.

 

 

The church is not a social club; we are here to build up the kingdom of God, President Hinckley.

 

BUDGET PROGRAM IS A 'TREMENDOUS ACT OF FAITH'

 

Date: 02/24/90

 

President Gordon B. Hinckley called the implementation of the new budget program a "tremendous act of faith," initiated by inspiration from the Almighty.

 

"I am thankful that the day has come, at last, when for the Latter-day Saints in the United States and Canada, the payment of honest tithes and generous offerings will provide the means for facilities and activities whereby we may worship together learn together and socialize together for group and individual benefit."

 

But he counseled that principles of thrift and wisdom must continue to be exercised under the new program. "We know that we are accountable to the Lord for the stewardship given us. We must be prudent. We must be conservative. We must be careful. . . . Great is the trust, tremendous is the responsibility.

 

"The Church is not so wealthy that it can indiscriminately scatter its resources," he admonished. "We must be extremely careful and wise, and I believe inspired, if this program, which involves many millions of dollars of added expense, is to function."

 

President Hinckley expressed his gratitude for the law of tithing, which he called "divine" and enables the funding of local units from general Church funds.

 

"I am confident that the Lord loves His people for the goodness of their lives and the generosity of their hearts as they consecrate of their means in the payment of tithes and offerings. I am grateful for the faith of the wealthy who give generously of their abundance. I am equally grateful for the faith of the poor, who likewise contribute with a great spirit of consecration.

 

"The Lord has made [tithing universal in its application among His people. It is miraculous in its simplicity. I see the complexity, almost beyond comprehension, of government systems of taxation, and I thank the Lord for the magnitude of His wisdom in making things simple concerning the financing of His kingdom."

 

President Hinckley recalled a stake over which he presided years ago. When the first ward was formed in that area, members bought land and constructed a meetinghouse without any help from the general funds of the Church. When that building was outgrown, they built a larger one entirely from their own resources.

 

"By the time I came into the presidency of that stake, the Church policy provided for matching funds, the Church to put up one dollar for each dollar provided by the local members. Under that formula, we in that fast-growing area built six new chapels, in addition to providing funds for their maintenance and all of the activity programs carried on in the various wards.

 

"There may have been a few murmurings, but the faith of the people overrode all of these. They gave generously, notwithstanding the stresses of their own circumstances, and the Lord blessed them. . . ."

 

People in those days would have thought the "millennium had come if we had received word that the Church would bear all of the costs of providing land, all of the cost incident to building construction, operation and maintenance, let alone an activity and administrative budget allowance of $40 per year per individual based on the number who attend sacrament meeting," President Hinckley said. "It is not the millennium, but this longed-for, hoped-for and prayed-for day has come."

 

The development and implementation of the new program was an "unfolding miracle," he testified.

 

With the change, he encouraged stake presidents that "expenses for the stake should be minimal, with all costs of physical facilities . . . being covered from the general funds of the Church. Let the budget funds which come from headquarters flow down to the wards on a basis measured by sacrament meeting attendance in each ward."

 

He emphasized that members should continue to give generous fast offerings, contributions to the general missionary fund and other donations to the Church beyond the payment of tithing.

 

President Hinckley also touched on the importance of activities, especially among the youth of the Church, and encouraged members to "look beyond the narrow boundaries of your own wards, and rise to the larger vision of this the work of God" in helping Him save His sons and daughters.

 

"I remind you that we should recognize that this Church is not a social club. This is the kingdom of God on earth. . . .

 

"Let us not worry and get all worked up about exotic excursions that now may not be possible. These might provide fun, wonderful fun, and young people, we all agree, need to have some fun under the direction of Church officers and teachers. But these officers and teachers, and these young men and women, are people of ingenuity who with faith and prayer can work out programs costing little in dollars that will yield tremendous dividends in wholesome recreation and faith-building activities. Perhaps we should be less concerned with fun and more with faith.

 

"This is a new and wonderful program. As with any new program, there will be a few items that will need to be corrected as we go along. There are still unanswered questions. . . . Time and experience will provide the answers. Meanwhile, be grateful, and prayerfully go to work to make it function. I promise you that you will be happy if you do so. Family life will be strengthened, and faith will increase."

 

 

(Budget Program Is a 'tremendous Act of Faith’, LDS Church News, 1990, 02/24/90 3.)

 

 

As a parent I have the right to choose what is most important for my family.  There are required meetings and optional meetings, don’t miss the required ones!

 

Study what happened to the church of Alma and Helaman, how they fell away after a short period of time.

 

“The hardest element to treat is a virtue carried to an extreme.”  The best activities occur in the home.

 

Elder Packer’s talk to Regional Representatives “Let Them Govern Themselves” 3/30/1990.

 

Let Them Govern Themselves

Elder Boyd K. Packer

March 30, 1990

  The Lord said, "Behold, I will hasten my work in its time. And I give unto you, who are the first laborers in this last kingdom, a commandment that you. . . organize yourselves, and prepare yourselves, and sanctify yourselves; yea, purify your hearts, and cleanse your hands and your feet before me, that I may make you clean." (D&C 88:73-74)

In the last period of time, since the October conference, the Quorum of the Twelve has been following that admonition against the obvious hastening that is taking place; the unprecedented, miraculous changing of the circumstances across the world. Nations, in a sense are being born in a day and the invitation now is for our missionaries to move into countries where we have no members and to move into countries where we have had members who have lived under almost impossible circumstances. This hastening has been the source of sobering reflection and we of the Twelve, under the direction of President Hunter, have held many meetings, over viewing and calling into attention things of the past; looking at our circumstances at the present, and looking into the future as is not only our calling, but our responsibility as prophets, seers, and revelators.

We have held meetings with the First Presidency and I think the theme that you have felt in this meeting and will feel from the conference and will see as the conference concludes with momentous events having occurred, that we need now to prepare ourselves and to put on the new man and the new woman, to change a mind-set and to move into the future that the Lord is preparing for us.

Recent letters announced the decision to fund the Church henceforth from tithes and offerings. As has been mentioned here two or three times today, other collections, assessments, and fund-raising, with a few and perhaps temporary exceptions, are to be discontinued.

In a recent satellite broadcast that was viewed here in the United States and Canada , the principles and doctrines which should govern the change were presented. While three men spoke, it was a single message. Since those talks were distributed or will reach you where translation is necessary, I will present but a brief quote, one from each of the counselors in the First Presidency which embody the spirit of the instruction.

President Monson:

•"The budget allowance program was created to reduce financial burdens on members.

•Members should not pay fees or be assessed to participate in Church programs.

•Priesthood leaders should reduce and simplify activities wherever possible.

•Let me repeat: Priesthood leaders should reduce and simplify activities wherever possible.

•Activities should be planned at little or no cost, should build testimonies and provide meaningful service to others."

And then he added: "It is the desire that restraint be used in programming youth activities and that consistency between young women and young men programs be achieved." (Thomas S. Monson, satellite broadcast, 18 Feb. 1990)

President Hinckley

"Perhaps we have gone to far" this is the roller coaster President Monson referred to earlier "in providing for some beyond what is needed or what is best in terms of the individuals and their families.

"It should be recognized the this Church is not a social club. This is the Kingdom of God in the earth. It is The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Its purpose is to bring salvation and exaltation to both the living and the dead.

"These officers and teachers, and these young men and women, are people of ingenuity who with faith and prayer can work out programs costing little in dollars that will yield tremendous dividends in wholesome recreation and faith-building activities. Perhaps we should be less concerned with fun and more with faith." (Gordon B. Hinckley, satellite broadcast 18 Feb. 1990)

This change, announced for the United States and Canada , will, by successive steps, be implemented worldwide. I repeat, just as soon as the procedures can be worked out and some experience gained, it will be implemented across the world.

To many, it is just a welcome relief, a change in procedure a relatively small thing.

It was the prophet Alma who told us "that by small and simple things are great things brought to pass. . . And the Lord God doth work by (small) means to bring about his great and eternal purposes" ( Alma 37:6-7).

To me this "small thing" is among the major decisions that I shall have witnessed in my lifetime. I will attempt to explain to you why my conviction of its importance is so fixed.

Like a Team of Doctors

In recent years we might be compared to a team of doctors issuing prescriptions to cure or to immunize our members against spiritual diseases. Each time some moral or spiritual ailment was diagnosed, we have rushed to the pharmacy to concoct another remedy, encapsulate it as a program and send it out with pages of directions for use.

While we all seem to agree that over medication, over-programming, is a critically serious problem, we have failed to reduce the treatments. It has been virtually impossible to affect any reduction in programs.

Each time we try, advocates cry to high heaven that we are putting the spiritual lives of our youth at risk. If symptoms reappear, we program even heavier doses of interviews, activities, meetings, and assessments.

The best answer perhaps is to withdraw all prescriptions and start over. The whole correlation effort, which took about twenty years, followed that course and much was accomplished. The habits for moral and spiritual health were defined. The scriptures were prescribed as the basic nourishment. The curriculum, loaded with spiritual nutrients, was developed but we did not allow time for it to work and we failed to close the pharmacy or even effectively control it.

We now have ourselves in a corner. For instance, we have reason to be seriously concerned about the lack of reverence in the Church. Perhaps this one thing, general across the world, is as much an interference with and a short-circuiting of inspiration as anything that could be pointed to. However, I dare not press for the corrections of that issue because we do not seem to be able to solve a problem without designing a program with pages of instruction and sending it out again.

It is time now for you who head the auxiliaries and the departments and those of us who advise them, after all the repetitive cautions from the First Presidency, to change our mind-set and realize that a reduction of and a secession from that constant programming must be accomplished.

The hardest ailment to treat is a virtue carried to the extreme. We cannot seem to learn that too much, even of a good thing, or too many good things, like vitamins taken in overdose, can be harmful.

In recent years I have felt, and I think I am not alone, that we were losing the ability to correct the course of the Church. You can not appreciate how deeply I feel about the importance of this present opportunity unless you know the regard, the reverence, I have for the Book of Mormon and how seriously I have taken the warnings of the prophets, particularly Alma and Helaman.

Both Alma and Helaman told of the church in their day. They warned about fast growth, the desire to be accepted by the world, to be popular, and particularly they warned about prosperity. Each time those conditions existed in combination, the Church drifted off course. All of those conditions are present in the Church today.

Helaman repeatedly warned, I think four times he used these words, that the fatal drift of the church could occur "in the space of not many years." In one instance it took only six years. (See Helaman 6:32, 7:6, 11:26)

The announcement of tithes and offerings, which has been sent now, is of such enormous importance because, perhaps for one time only, we have an opportunity in one sweeping stroke, to correct much of what heretofore we have been unable to correct.

The revelations tell us that there are limits to what mankind will be allowed to do. When those limits are reached, then comes destruction. And, the patience of the Lord with all of us who are in leadership positions, is not without limits.

Regimentation

The most dangerous side effect of all we have prescribed in the way of programming and instructions and all is the over regimentation of the Church. This over regimentation is a direct result of too many programmed instructions. If we would compare the handbooks of today with those of a generation ago you would quickly see what I mean. And Brother Hanks mentioned that the Melchizedek Priesthood Handbook is an amalgamation of several handbooks and a reduction of them all with, I think, nothing lost; much gained.

"Teach them correct principles," the prophet said, "and then let," let--a big word, "them govern themselves." (See messages of the Firsts Presidency, p. 54.) Our members should not, according to the scriptures, need to be commanded in all things. (See D&C 58:26)

Local leaders have been effectively conditioned to hold back until programmed as to what to do, how, to whom, when, and for how long. Can you see that when we overemphasize programs at the expense of principles, we are in danger of losing the inspiration, the resourcefulness, that which should characterize Latter-day Saints. Then the very principle of individual revelation is in jeopardy and we drift from a fundamental gospel principle!

"Adam fell that men might be: and men are, that they might have joy." That much-quoted verse in the book of Mormon is followed by this one:

"And the Messiah cometh in the fullness of time, that he may redeem the children of men from the fall. And because that they are redeemed from the fall they have become free forever, knowing good from evil; to act for themselves and not to be acted upon." (2 Nephi 2:25:26)

My feeling about our present opportunity with this change in funding is based on doctrine. For generations we have taught that the temporal salivation of the Saints depends upon independence, industry, thrift, and self-reliance. We would never stray from that in teaching about temporal things.

On the other hand, it is possible that we are doing the very thing spiritually that we have been resolutely resisting temporally; fostering dependence rather than independence, extravagance rather than thrift, indulgence rather than self-reliance.

We send two diverging signals and the Lord has told us: "if a house be divided against itself, that house cannot stand" (Mark 3:25).

It is not that any one thing we have been doing is wrong, for we have acted with the best of intentions. Some of us remember when President Kimball saw the outlay of curriculum and the vast display of printed material. He said he was frightened, "We have done it all with the best intentions." It is just that we can do far too much of good things. One or two reports of inactivity or extreme behavior and we rush to make corrections across the whole Church with more programs, more interviews, more assessments.

Risks Involved

This change will cause a reduction in programs and activities; that we intended. I quickly admit that there are risks involved when we simplify instructions or loosen up on regimentation. It is no different than what we face when our own children begin to mature and venture out into the world. Wise parents loosen the apron strings and help children to leave the nest to start anew the cycle of mortal life.

If we teach them correct principles rather than overburdening them with too many instructions and programmed activities, they can be both free and spiritually safe in any nation, among any people, in any age. If we indulge them too much, or make them too dependent, we weaken them morally, then they will be compelled by nature itself to find the wrong way.

The only safe course is to make sure that they know the gospel, that they are acquainted with the scriptures, with revelation, with repentance, with how the Holy Ghost functions, with the voice of the Spirit.

A knowledge of right and wrong does not automatically result from programmed activities. It must be taught.

We Need to be Temperate

We need a sensible balancing of and a careful withdrawal of this medication of over programming. It can begin simply by restraining ourselves from writing more prescriptions, and by counseling local leaders not to replace the ones we phase out. So, the problem Regional Representatives! There will be the tendency, we have seen it already when we began to phase out and withdraw, for the local leaders, conditioned as they are, to want to use that time and build up more detailed programs on their own.

We must use great care and be temperate. There are always those who will go to the extreme and want to cancel all activities. That is not what I am talking about, not at all. I am talking about a careful course correction.

There are always those who cry for a lifting of all the rules and regulations and laws and restraints. Always they claim that the doctrine of free agency demands that.

Moral Agency

The agency the Lord has given us is not a "free" agency. The term "free" agency is not found in the revelations. It is a moral agency. The Lord has given us freedom of choice:

"That every man may act in doctrine and principle pertaining to futurity, according to the moral agency which I have given unto him, that every man may be accountable for his own sins in the day of judgement." (D&C 101:78)

There is no agency without choice; there is no choice without freedom; there is no freedom without risk; nor true freedom without responsibility.

This change in budgeting will have the effect of returning much of the responsibility for teaching and counseling and activities to the family where it belongs. There will be fewer intrusions into the family schedules and into the family purses.

It will set a better balance between families being assessed time and money to support Church activities, and Church activities complementing what families should do for themselves and backing away to an extent so they can do it. That is, if all of us will understand and will do it.

I repeat, perhaps for one time only we have the opportunity to adjust that balance so that Church activities sustain parents and families rather than the other way around.

Now, there will be smaller budgets and fewer activities, fewer programs. That will leave a vacuum. Nothing likes a vacuum.

We must resist, absolutely resist, the temptation to program that vacuum. That space belongs to families. When we cut down on Sundays to the block plan that consolidated our meetings and left some time open, you know what happened. Now brethren, it is their time. Let them use it as they feel to do -- for better or for worse. That is the risk. If we fail to teach them correct principles, teach them the doctrine, they will not know how to govern themselves.

If we do, then that vacuum will be filled with prayer and work and study, study for school, for instance, study the gospel. It will be filled with faith and reverence. It will be filled with the intimate love between husband and wife, with the tender love of parents to children. There will come a safe and virtuous dependency. Latter-day Saints will come to depend upon the Lord instead of upon the headquarters of the Church.

We are in mortality to receive a mortal body, to be tested, to prepare for Godhood. There is no testing without choice. Please, for this one time, honor the agency of the members, the families.

Reorientation of Thinking

This change has given me renewed hope. It will require some considerable adjustment in our thinking and a change in deeply ingrained habits.

What we do we must do wisely, temperately. We can effect a course correction and we will see the Church delivered safely to the next generation. And then we can move into these developing nations with the gospel of Jesus Christ.

It is my personal conviction, I think it is obvious, that this change in budgeting will have enormous reactivation influence on those who have held back because they could not afford the cost of Church activities.

Stake leaders now must sponsor fewer activities, leaving most of the time and money to ward leaders. We have had reports, for instance, of stake presidents that, in one case, want to keep 65% of the allotments so that they can continue with their stake activities and leave the wards to themselves. Now, will you Regional Representatives watch that, to see that budgets are shifted down to the wards. It will need your attention. Ward leaders in turn, by this action, will be leaving more of both time and money to the families.

Another point. Some of us have missed the point that this is a reduction in both time and money. In fact, the letters that came out from the First Presidency over the last years, one of them issued five times, for instance, emphasizes the reduction in the time required of Church members first, not just the money.

Commercial Substitutes

Something else we must watch: already there grows up commercially oriented activities. Resourceful members of the Church saying, "Well, if the Church is going to back off on this, we can provide that" and you can see the obvious. Be careful of those. Be alert to them; beware of them.

Tithes and Offerings

When President Benson was a stake president, he wrote the First Presidency proposing that the Church be operated on tithes alone. It took him a little while to get it done. He said: "We will depend on tithing more than ever to finance the programs of the Church. That will be possible only as all our leaders and more of our membership are full-tithe payers." (President Ezra Taft Benson, Regional Representative Seminar, 2 April 1982)

There should not be the slightest hesitancy to teach and preach and emphasize the principle of tithing. Tithing is a principle with a promise. Read Malachi. That statement "prove me now herewith, saith the Lord of Hosts, if I will not open you the windows of heaven, and pour you out a blessing that there shall not be room enough to receive it," those blessings come simply from bringing your tithes and offerings. And He said "neither shall your vine cast her fruit before the time in the field, saith the Lord of hosts." (See Malachi 3:10-11) This is a principle with a promise, and it is the door to the temple.

The scriptures speak of tithes and of offering they do not speak of assessments or fund raising. To be an offereing it has to be freely given, not assessed or requested.

Spiritual vs. Temporal

Tithing is not so much a matter of money as a matter of faith. While the change in budgeting may seem at first to be a temporal matter, the effect of it will be spiritual.

The Lord said that not at any time has he given either a law or a commandment which is temporal. (See D&C 29:34-35) Of course he has not! Temporal means temporary and, whether his laws govern the physical or the spiritual, his laws are eternal!

Bishop's Interviews

Another "small thing" has happened, something unprecedented. You know that the guides and handbooks prescribe so many bishops’ interviews and regulated the frequency of them that it would be literally impossible for a bishop to conduct them all without him having to neglect other things. Because of that, bishops often end up feeling inadequate or guilty.

I will read a statement from the new Melchizedek Priesthood Handbook that Brother Hanks introduced to us. Listen carefully:

"In large wards, the interviews of Aaronic Priesthood young men and young women may become burdensome. Bishops, acting with inspiration and wisdom, may wish to adjust their scheduling and frequency of interviews." Can you see the loosening up? "For example, some young members may need added attention while others may need less frequent interviews than are suggested. The bishop should interview priests and young women of corrresponding age and may assign other youth interviews to his counselors. When a counselor encounters serious matters, such as transgressions that require confession, he should refer the member to the bishop without delay. Parents should be encouraged to stay close to their chidlren allowing local Church leaders to act in a supporting role."

Yesterday in our temple meeting we were talking about this and talking a little about the other meetings that the other meetings that the bishop is scheduled to be to. Every time there is a graduation or a change in something, they prerscribe the bishop to be at the meeting. President Monson mentioned that when he was a bishop, he followed the practice that if the counselor had something to do with the organization, he said, "Well even though the handbook said the bishop should be there, you will be the bishop for that meeting!" There can be a delegation.

The Family

Now, in conclusion, I once thought the family was unfairly neglected in the Church, particularly in the organization. We have Melchizedek priesthood quorums to foster the interest of men; the Relief Society for Sister. We have Aaronic Priesthood quorums for boys, young women for girls, primary for the children and so on. Each organization has general and local presidencies and quorums and boards.

But for the family there is no such thing, not so much as a committee. The family has been everybody's business. Everybody's business, as we know, is nobody's business. I used to worry as we designed programs to fit the weak, unstable family, scheduling for men, women, children, youth, young adults, singles, everything, with too little attention paid to the effect it was having on stable families.

I remember when some pressed for a written form so families could report their compliance with the family home evening program. We did not permit it. And to this day we have some who want to program formal interviews between parents and their children.

I once wondered if we should create an agency to represent the family. But on more serious reflection, I changed my view. There are some things which cannot be counted and should not be programmed. Matters with deepest doctrinal significance must be left to married couples and to parents to decide for themselves. We have referred them to gospel principles and left them to exercise their moral agency. Serious problems often come voluntarily to their bishop. That is the best way.

We cannot program individual and family prayer, indeed all of the basic human relationships, the emotional and the feelings, the bonds that bind man to woman and parents to children, all of the quiet influences, the sacred things that are centered in family life. The family is apart from and above the other organizations and under the sealing authority, more enduring than them all.

While the family may suffer both neglect and intrusion because of our penchant to program everything, nevertheless, at the same time, the famiy has been protected. Therein lies a testimony of the genius of Church organization.

I have but to ask one "what if" question to convince you of that. What if, in the correlation process, we had organized a general board of the family? The very thought of it sends chills of horror through my being.

Now, you know why I feel as I do about this change.

The world opened to us. We move now into developing nations and into nations liberated from slavery, not unlike the Israelites as they came from Egypt. Their wilderness will be one of poverty in both temporal and spiritual knowledge. We must not indulge them as we have indulged ourselves. If we do as we should, wherever there is a Latter-day Saint family, there the Church stands organized.

Alma spoke also of miracles worked by small means, and he included a warning; "Nevertheless, because those miracles were worked by small means it did show unto them marvelous works." But, "they were slothful, and forgot to exercise their faith and diligence and then those marvelous works ceased and they did not progress in their journey." (Alma 37:41)

Brothers and sisters, have you not heard that voice from the dust, the prophets of ancient times warning us, teaching us? Can we not now move into the future to meet the tremendous opportunities that are before us and taketh the gospel to every nation, kindred, tongue, and people, leaving much behind, not neglecting those fundamental doctrines, those fundamental gospel principles and ordinances. Then we will have acted in the offices to which we have been called with all diligence and the Lord will bless us.

I bear witness that He lives, that this is his church, that it is led by inspiration and that his spirit is guiding us, in the name of Jesus Christ, amen.

Let Them Govern Themselves

Boyd K. Packer

1. Reduce and simplify -- course correction. Pres. Monson

2. Less concerned with fun and more with faith. Pres. Hinckley

3. Don't create additional programs.

4. Warning: Fast growth, accepted by the world, prosperous and popular.

5. Teach them correct principles "let" them govern themselves only safe course is to make sure they:

a. know the gospel

b. are acquainted with the scriptures

c. are acquainted with revelation

d. are acquainted with repentance

e. are acquainted with how the Holy Ghost functions

f. are acquainted with the voice of the Spirit

--"a knowledge of right and wrong does not automatically result from programmed activities. It must be taught!"

--Promise

"If we teach them correct principles rather than overburden them with too many instructions and programmed activities, they can be both free and spiritually safe in any nation, among any people, in any age."

6. Return the responsibility of teaching and counseling to the family -- resist the temptation to program the vacuum.

7. Shift budget emphasis from stake to wards.

8. Reduction of both time and money.

9. Teach tithing.

10. "Family is apart from and above the other organizations and under the sealing authority, more enduring than them all."